Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWorkingGroup_Agenda8_SummaryCCWG – Meeting Summary 1 01/09/08 CITY OF CHULA VISTA Climate Change Working Group Public Works Corp Yard (Lunchroom) January 9, 2008 3:00pm – 5:00pm MEETING SUMMARY IN ATTENDANCE Paige Newman Risa Baron Derek Turbide Carla Blackmar Leo Miras Erin Pitts Dawn Beintema Chris Schodowski Andrea Cook Michael Meacham MEASURES SELECTION/ REFINEMENT MEETING  UPDATE ON TEXT COMPLETION (5 min) Only Leo Miras and Derek Turbide had text to submit. The group is waiting on text from Cesar Rios and Richard Chavez.  COMMENTS/ REVISIONS ON FINAL REPORT FORMATTING AND ORGANIZATION (30 min) The group decided that the final report should include both a summary table showing selected measures as well as longer text explanations for each measure. The group decided that the text format outlined in the Final Recommendation Worksheet was adequate with some minor revisions. * The group discussed whether it was necessary for the chart and text to include more detailed assessments of the degree of each measure’s impact [on reducing climate change] and on the length of time it would take for that impact to be felt. The group determined that because the final measures had been selected on account of their expected significant impact and short implementation time frame, that it would not be necessary to put a finer point on the length of time or the degree of impact.  COMMENTS/ REVISIONS TO MEASURES 6 AND 12 BY DEREK TURBIDE (1 hour) * The group recommended that the format be amended to include a brief 2 -3 sentence introduction to each measure, and that the “Recommended Performance Metrics” be moved to a later point in the document. CCWG – Meeting Summary 2 01/09/08 The discussion of measures 6 and 12 focused on whether numeric targets for fleet MPG/percentage AFV (Alternative Fuel Vehicle) needed to be specified in the measures’ text. It was generally agreed that a percentage goal reflecting a relative improvement, such as “average MPG for the municipal fleet should become 15% more efficient by 2010” would be better than a hard and fast goal such as “the municipal fleet should average 38 MPG by 2010.” In the case of measure 12, discussion focused on how far the measure would need to go towards resolving logistical issues such as the legality of requiring a reduction in average MPG amongst fleets licensed by the city. It was generally determined that the text of the measures is intended to provide general guidance, and that it would be the responsibility of City Staff to work through the logistics of each measure after the general concept was approved.  COMMENTS/ REVISIONS TO MEASURES 15 AND 16 BY LEO MIRAS (8 minutes) The CCWG generally approved the text of measures 15 and 16. Limited time curtailed further discussion, and refinements to this text will be made over email.  NEXT STEPS (5 minutes) The Group decided that discussion and refinement of the measures absent from that day’s meeting would have to take place via email and internet, though most group members stated a preference for face-to-face dialogue. In the next week, City Staff will work on a rough draft of the report describing the CCWG process. Members will read and provide comments on the measure text written by Mr. Rios and Mr. Chavez during the next week. A rough format for the presentation of CCWG recommendations to Council Member Castaneda on 1/23 (or perhaps 1/30) was suggested. The group generally decided that they wanted to provide Council Member Castaneda an opportunity to give feedback and revisions to the recommendations, rather than presenting a completely refined and finished product. Michael Meacham suggested that it would be important for each CCWG member to take the time and explain their stake in the CCWG to Council Member Castaneda at the outset of the next meeting.  NEXT MEETING (5 minutes) It is possible that the date for the next meeting will be pushed back to 1/30/08 to give the group more time to complete the text for their report and recommendations. The next meeting was originally scheduled for 1/23/08. CCWG – Meeting Summary 3 01/09/08