Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutcc min 1980/01/24 MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA Held Thursday - 4:00 p.m. January 24, 1980 An adjourned regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, California, was held on the above date beginning at 4:00 p.m. in the Council Conference Room, City Hall, 276 Fourth Avenue. ROLL CALL Councilmen present: Mayor Hyde, Councilmen Gillow, Cox, McCandliss Councilman Scott (arrived late) Councilmen absent: None Staff present: City Manager Cole, Development Services Administrator Robens, Director of Community Development Desrocher5, City Engineer Lippitt, Director o~ Parks & Recreation Hall, Traffic Engineer Hansen 1. PUBLIC HEARING - This being the time and place as advertised, Mayor Hyde BLOCK GRANT BUDGET FOR opened the public hearing. 1980-81 AND THREE YEAR PLAN Director of Community Development Desrochers explained that this is the sixth year of the Block Grant Program. The application for the 1980-81 Block Grant must be submitted to the State and CPO for review by February 20. This is the first of the two public hearings required. The proposed budget being presented today is based on community input and Council's reaction and approval is needed. Year 1 Joe Sanseverino, Development Specialist, referring to charts, (1979-80) detailed the three-year budget plan noting the programs approved by HUD and the City Council last year and underway at the present time for 1979-80 (Year Section 108 Payback - $250,000 Housing Rehab: Feaster - Mueller $50,000 Vista Square $50,000 Mobile Home Rehabilitation $50,000 Local Development Corporation $25,000 Administration $40,000 Code Enforcement $20,000 Citizen Participation $5,000 Pavement Overlay $60,000 Public Improvement Study $3,000 Storm Drain $196,000 Vista Square Park $110,000 Memorial Park Landscaping $50,000 Park Gym $20,000 Senior Center Rehabilitation $10,000 Senior Center Supplies & Services $11,000 Madrona Sewer $12,000 Garrett/Landis Alley $21,000 Wheelchair Ramps $8,000 Neighborhood Center Study $5,000 Local Option $63.000 TOTAL $1,059.000 Held Thursday - 4:00 p.m. -2- January 24, 1980 Year 2 1980-81) Mr. Sanseverino reported that the federal government has advised the City that the first payment of the loan under Section 108 (one million dollars) does not have to be paid until August 1980 (the sum of $250,000); therefore, the money has been re-allocated. Specifically, the Block Grant requires 75% of the monies to go to low and moderate income neighborhoods. Staff is proposing that this money be allocated to the Feaster, Mueller, and Vista Square areas. The budget for Year 2 (1980-81) is proposed as follows Section 108 Payback - $250,000 Housing Rehab: Feaster Mueller $50,000 Vista Square $50,000 Mobile Home Rehabilitation $50,000 Local Development Corporation $25,000 Administration $60,000 Code Enforcement $35,000 Citizen Participation $5,000 pavement Overlay $100,000 Street Improvements $90,000 Wheelchair Ramps $10,000 Neighborhood Center A & E $20,000 Third Avenue Improvements $250,000 Local Option $73,000 TOTAL $1,068,000 Council discussion Council discussion followed with Mr. Sanseverino and ~@. Desrochers answering questions pertaining to certain aspects of the proposed budget; repayment of the one million dollar loan; housing rehabilitation program; inflationary costs of programs; remodeling of the Senior Center (former Taco building at Memorial Park). James Matherly Mr. Matherly read a prepared speech in which he said that the 402 Oaklawn Avenue public hearing publication for this meeting should have stated Chula Vista what things were to be discussed and the "sorry record of government overspending." Andrew Partch Mr. Partch stated that at the meeting held on Thursday, Chairman January 17, the Commission voted unanimously to recommend Parks & Recreation approval of the three-year Block Grant budget. Committee Richard Welsh Mr. Welsh commented that the Board of Appeals has recommended Chairman approval of the Block Grant proposal; however, five years Board of Appeals ago, they were instrumental in trying to establish in the State of California and the federal government the use of smoke detector systems. They are requesting that the amount of $2,500 be appropriated for buying smoke detector systems for senior citizens in the Block Grant program. Mr. Sanseverino noted that as part of the housing rehabilita- tion program, ail persons who take out a loan are required to install a smoke detector. K. Nick Slijk Mr. Slijk, speaking on behalf of the Town Centre Business Chamber of Commerce and Professional Association, asked that strong emphasis be given to continual improvement of the sidewalks. Mr. Slijk noted the sum of $250,000 has been proposed and asked that this program be implemented. Clarence Knight Mr. Knight referred to the "substandard" sidewalk on 117 Jefferson Street Jefferson Street between Flower and "E" Street, stating it Chula Vista 5s 4 feet in width and should be widened up to present City standards. Held Thursday - 4:00 p.m. -3- January 24, 1980 Mr. Jackson Mr. Jackson asked for street lights at the darkened inter- Chula Vista sections. Ne noted the areas where church services are held in the evening indicating that the flood lights used to illuminate the areas are far better than the City street lights. He asked that a timer and drop line be installed (with approval of the churches) to give these streets better lighting~ Motion for staff It was moved by Mayor Hyde, seconded by Councilman Gillow investigation and unanimously carried by those present that the staff look into the proposal of Mr. Jackson which is essentially that they investigate the possibility of working out arrangements in certain areas with private ~arties (in this case, a church) For them to keen their lights (that they have installed) to help improve lighting in a very dark area, particularly "G" Street. Public hearing closed There being no further comments, either for against, the hearing was declared closed. Next public hearing Mr. Sanseverino announced that the next Block Grant public hearing will be held on February 19, 1980 at 7:00 p~m. The Mayor advised the staff to look into the public hearing notice (as referred to by Mr. Matherly) to see if it could be more informative. (Councilman Scott arrived at this time - 4:45 p.m.) Motion for Executive It was moved by ~ayor Hyde, seconded by Councilman Gillow Session and unanimously carried that upon completion of the agenda, an Executive Session be called for pending litigation matters (at the request of Warren Company). 2. REPORT ON THIRD AVENUE City Engineer Lippitt explained that at the Conference held on PROJECT "H" TO "I" December 13, 1979, discussion was held on the method of STREETS - CITY ENGINEER traffic control (median island) on Third Avenue between "H" and "I" Streets. The Council voted to construct a raised median island between "H" Street and Shasta Street and request- ed staff to work with the County to develop solutions to the portion between Shasta and "I" Street and further, to look into the bus stop location proposed for this area. Mr. Lippitt submitted a graph and discussed the two alterna- tives: Alternative 1: Installing a "pork chop" type island to discourage left turns in and out of the County Court Complex; a left turn pocket at Whitney and a continuous left turn lane for all of the driveways on the east side of Third Avenue. This alternative prohibits parking along the east side of Third Avenue. Alternative 2: Construction of a raised median between "H" Stree~ and a aistance approximately 100 feet south of Whitney; a left turn pocket at "I" Street; bctweon this pocket and Shasta, parking would be provided for the businesses on the east side of the street. Staff is recommending this alterna- tive. Dan McGinty, Manager Mr. McGinty spoke against the raised island along Third Avenue First Federal Saving noting the difficulties the motorists would have in getting Loan into the bank area. He said he s~ok¢ to Supervisor Hamilton Third and "H" Street about this and received his commitment that the County would not "contribute one dime" toward this street improvement if the islands were put in. Held Thursday - 4:00 p.m. -4- January 24, 1980 K. Niek Slijk Mr. Slijk stated that the Chamber has been against raised ChamBer of Commerce islands for about 19 years. He cited the expense of install- ing the concrete medians and recommended strongly that the Council go to a painted traffic control measure and then look at it again once a clearly defined pattern is established. At that time, if it is deemed necessary, then the determina- tion to install the raised medians can be made. Myron Dalseth Mr. Dalseth said he is developing the property on the east side of Third Avenue adjacent to the bank building (in partnership with Jeanne Campbell). He objected to the raised medians stating it would be detrimental since it would block access into the properties. Council discussion Discussion followed regarding having double yellow lines versus the median islands; the traffic pattern projected for this area compared to what currently exists on Fourth and "H" Street; the proposed bus stop location; sending the proposed traffic plan to the Police department for comments; the recommendation of the Safety Commission not to put in the concrete islands; the savings in cost of installing the islands now; accident situations at this type of intersection~ Traffic islands along City Manager Cole commented on the reasons the raised islands Broadway were taken out on Broadway (disruption of traffic when house- movers used this route and inebriates driving into the islands). Mr. Cole said he still feels the islands were an appropriate control along Broadway and wished they were still in. Motion for Alternate 2 It was moved by Mayor Hyde and seconded by Councilman Gillow with modifications for approval of Alternate 2 with this exception: That the divider strip south of Shasta and Beyond Whitney be modified to simply be double painted lines and that a "pork-chop" be installed in the entrance to the Court Complex. Discussion of motion Councilwoman McCandliss asked if any consideration was given to cutting down on the length of the concrete island - installing it just to the turn pocket. Councilman Soctt agreed suggesting a painted island be put in at that point. Traffic Engineer Hansen said that although it is illegal to cross a yellow painted line, it will be done here. City Engineer Lippitt indicated that the concrete island can be shortened; however, there must be adequate control over the driveways on the east side of Third Avenue. Amendment to motion It was moved by Councilman Scott, seconded by Councilman Cox and unanimously carried to have the median (up to that point it starts breaking and it is a little more than a turning lane), that portion to be changed to a double, double turning lane (painted divider instead of a raised median). Clarification of motion Mayor Hyde stated that the motion as amended calls for the northern segment of the proposed median to be shortened, plus the installation of a "pork-chop" at the entrance to the court complex and that the proposed median divider above it would be also a double painted line. Motion carried as The motion, as amended, carried unanimously. amended Bus Stop location It was moved by Councilman Scott, seconded by Mayor Hyde and unanimously carried that the staff's explanation regard- ing the bus stop location be accepted (located near the entrance to the court building - in the third lane of travel), Held Thursday - 4:00 p.m. -5- January 24, 1980 3. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT City Manager Cole stated that the Warren people have decided instead of the Executive Session, that they will send the Council a confidential memo regarding the matter they wished to discuss this afternoon. Yhere will be no need for an Executive Session. 4. ~AYOR'S REPORT Dick Brown Inquiry Mayor Hyde said he received a telephone call from Mr. Dick Brown (representing the Gersten Company) regarding the development of "H" Street. The Mayor was not in at the time the call was made and subsequent calls to Mr. Brown's office have not been successful in reaching him. The Mayor added that he will continue to try to contact Mr. Brown regarding this matter and will report to Council. Sweetwater Flood Control Mayor Hyde referred to a copy of the letter from Colonel Channel/I-S4 Project Teague to Congressman Van Deerlin regarding the lack of funds to construct the Flood Control Project and 1-54. Council discussion ensued regarding the advisability of making personal contact with representatives of the Army Corps of Engineers and the Federal Legislators. Motion for staff to set It was moved by Mayor Hyde, seconded by Councilman Scott and up meeting unanimously carried that the staff contact the Army Corps of Engineers and Congressman Van Deerlin's office to explore the possibility of a meeting and to see what is necessary to get some funds out of the current year budgeting shifted into this program. City Manager Cole commented that the Mayor and Chamber of Commerce of National City are putting together a reception on January 29 for the CalTrans Commission at which time Route 54 w/Ii be discussed. Watts Property Mayor Hyde reported that the Watts property development is under way - the tentative map for the development of "H" Street and 1-805 is in-house and being processed and will eventually go before the Planning Commission for a public hearing prior to being considered by the City Council. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Hyde adjourned the meeting at 5:40 p.m. to the meeting scheduled for Tuesday, February 5, 1980 at 7:00 p.m. ~~~ ~ity~lerk ~