HomeMy WebLinkAboutcc min 1980/05/06 MINUTES OF A REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF THE
CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
Held Tuesday - 7:00 p.m. May 6, 1980
A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, California, was held on
the above date beginning at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Public Services Building,
276 Fourth Avenue.
ROLL CALL
Councilmen present: Mayor Hyde, Comncilmen Gillow, Cox, McCandliss, Scott
Councilmen absent: None
Staff present: City Manager Cole, City Attorney Lindberg, Development Services
Administrator Robens, City Engineer Lippitt, Director of Planning
Peterson, Director of Building and Housing Grady, Director of Parks
and Recreation Hall, Current Planning Supervisor Lee
The pledge of allegiance to the Flag was led by Mayor Hyde followed by a moment of silena
prayer.
1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Councilwoman McCandliss, seconded by
Councilman Scott and unanimously carried that the minutes
of the meetings of April 24, 28 and 29, 1980 be approved,
copies having been sent to each Councilman.
2. SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY
a. Introduction of Council Mayor Hyde introduced Mr. Joe Cocozzo, member of the Chamber
Guest of Commerce and publisher of the STAR-NEWS.
b. PROCLAMATION - Mayor Hyde read the Proclamation and presented it to Mr. Bus
Proclaiming the month of Johnson, President of the Chula Vista Senior Citizens Club.
May 1980 as "Senior
Citizen Month"
3. ORAL CO~UNICATIONS
Clarence Knight Mr. Knight referred to the Council action taken on his
117 Jefferson complaint regarding the substandard sidewalk on Flower
Chula Vista Street. He asked if staff has made any referrals on such
substandard sidewalks to the Council in accordance with
Council direction.
City Engineer Lippitt said no referrals have been made and
the condition on Flower Street was resolved with the action
taken by the Council.
Gloria Fountain Ms. Fountain reported that Mr. Moore, owner of Diamond Cab,
6025 Edgewater passed away last week and Mrs. Moore was here this evening
San Diego against doctor's orders. She asked if the Council would
(Manager - Diamond Cab) move Item 18 on the agenda to be considered prior to Item
5 (Public hearings) in order for Mrs. Moore to get home as
soon as possible.
Motion to move Item 18 It was moved by Councilman Scott, seconded by Mayor Hyde and
on the agenda unanimously carried that Item 18 be considered following
Item 4 - Written Communications.
Nick Slijk Mr. Slijk referred to Item S on the agenda (public hearing
(Representing Chamber and ordinance) regarding the maintenance of landscaping by
of Commerce) property owners. He said the Chamber of Commerce Beautifi-
cation Committee had a recommendation which will be
finalized at the goard meeting of the Chamber on May 15.
He asked that Item 5 be postponed for two weeks in order
to have this recommendation considered.
Motion to continue It was moved by Councilman Scott, seconded by Councilman
Item 5 for two weeks Gillow and unanimously carried that Item 5 he continued
for two weeks (until May
Held Tuesday - 7:00 p.m. -2- May 6, 1980
ORAL CO~UNICATIONS (Cont.)
Haniseli Alagata Mr. Alagata discussed a problem he has due to dirt being
81 Quintard piled behind a retaining wall by Mr. Don Russell, Developer,
Chula Vista in making improvements to Quintard Street in connection
with the Shepherdville Subdivision. Mr. Alagata said
when it rains, mud is washed onto his property and he has
been unable to resolve this problem with Mr. Russell. He
asked the Council for City assistance in this matter.
Motion to refer to It was moved by Councilman Cox, seconded by Councilman
staff Scott and unanimously carried that this matter be referred
to staff and asked for a report back to Council and to
Mr. Alagata.
Mayor Hyde suggested that Mr. Alagata contact the City
Engineer's office tomorrow (Wednesday) and describe the
situation.
The Council concurred that staff make an oral report.
Joseph L. Henderson Mr. Henderson said he would like to make an appeal from
312 Hilltop Drive a requirement that he install public improvements in
Chula Vista front of his home at 312 Hilltop Drive. Due to modifica-
tions made to his home, he is required to install curb,
sidewalk, and driveway approach, and he was unaware of
the 10-day limitation on filing an appeal.
Motion to waive 10 It was moved by Councilman Scott and seconded by Councilman
day limit and schedule Gillow that the 10-day limit be waived and have this docket-
on Council agenda ed on the City Council agenda.
Council discussion In response to questions from the Council, Mr. Lippitt said
there would be no problem if the limit is waived and a
report can be prepared in two to three weeks.
Motion restated and Councilman Scott restated his motion and moved that the
carried 10-day appeal rule be waived and the 10-day limit start
this evening and have the item docketed in two weeks after
that. Councilman Gillow agreed as the second and the
motion carried unanimously.
Maurice R. McMahon Mr. McMahon said he was representing the Chula Vista Miss
1573 Loma Court Softball America League and they are asking that the
Chula Vista current softball facilities, located at Orange Avenue south
of the South Bay Little League Complex, be provided to the
League as permanent facilities. He outlined their propo-
sal and asked that a similar agreement be approved as
provided to other organizations.
Motion to refer to It was moved by Mayor Hyde, seconded by Councilwoman
staff and Parks and McCandliss and unanimously carried that this matter be
Recreation Commission referred to staff and the Parks and Recreation Commission
for investigation and recommendation.
4. WRITTEN COMFFONICATIONS
a. REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF The Chula Vista Town Centre Association is sponsoring a
SIDEWALK ORDINANCE FOR special event honoring Flag day on June 13 and 14. They
JUNE 15 and 14, 1980 asked that Code requirements regarding sidewalk sales be
waived for this event on Third Avenue from "E" to "G"
Street.
Motion to approve It was moved by Councilman Cox, seconded by Councilman
request Scott and unanimously carried that the Council waive Code
requirements relating to sales in the public right of way,
subject to staff conditions.
Held Tuesday - 7:00 p.m. -3- May 6, 1980
WRITTEN CO~[MUNICATIONS (Cont.)
a. CLAIM AGAINST THE CITY - A claim was filed on behalf of Dale Nelson on February 26,
DALE NELSON, 4417 ALLEN 1~80 for alleged damages in the amount of $50,000 as the
SCHOOL LANE, BONITA result of the City issuing a permit for a development
which caused excessive water runoff through the claimant's
property. It was the recommendation of the insurance
adjuster, Carl Warren & Company, that the claim be denied.
Motion to reject It was moved by Councilwoman McCandliss, seconded by
claim Councilman Scott and unanimously carried that the claim
he rejected.
PUBLIC HEARINGS AND RELATED RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
18. PUBLIC HEARING - This being the time and place as advertised, Mayor Hyde
CONSIDERATION OF reopened the public hearing.
INCREASE OF TAXICAB
RATES IN THE CITY OF Both Yellow and Diamond Cab Companies requested rate
CHULA VISTA (Continued increases to $1.20 for the first 1/5 mile and 20¢ for each
from 4/29/80) additional 1/5 mile which amounts to a rate of $2.80 for
the first mile and $1.00 for each succeeding mile (11%
and 25% respectively).
Staff recommendation The Director of Public Safety submitted information in a
written statement indicating that he was advised by the
City of San Diego that their Council Transit Committee
will be recommending all government controls on taxi rates
be lifted; therefore, it was his recommendation that
Chula Vista discontinue the practice of holding public
hearings on taxi rates and that the Council simply accept
the maximum rate of $1.50 as it now exists in San Diego.
Councilman Scott said the public hearing was left open to
get information on exactly what analysis San Diego had
done, and since this was not available, he suggested
Council proceed.
Public hearing closed There being no comments, either for or against, the public
hearing was declared closed.
a. RESOLUTION NO. 10078 - Offered by Councilman Scott, the reading of the text was
~J~ENDING RESOLUTION waived by unanimous consent, passed and adopted by the
NO. 9733 FIXING TAXI- following vote, to-wit:
CAB RATES IN THE CITY
OF CHULA VISTA (Con- AYES: Councilmen Scott, Gillow, Cox, Hyde, McCandliss
tinued from 4/29/80) Noes: None
Absent: None
Motion to accept It was moved by Councilman Scott seconded by Councilman
staff recommendation Cox and unanimously carried that the staff recommendation
he accepted (discontinue the practice of holding public
hearings on taxicab rates and accept the rate set in
San Diego.)
S. PUBLIC HEARING - This being the time and place as advertised, Mayor Hyde
CONSIDERATION OF AN opened the public hearing.
~qENDMENT TO THE b~UNI-
CIPLE CODE RELATING TO The amendment to the City Code would require property owners
MAINTENANCE OF LAND- or occupants in multiple family, commercial and industrial
SCAPING BY PROPERTY zones to maintain the public area between thc private
OWNERS property line and the curb line to minimize dirt and debris
which can be hazardous and injurious to health.
Item 5 continued [This item was continued for two weeks - to May 20, 1980 -
see motion on page g of the minutes.)
Held Tuesday - 7:00 p.m. -4- May 6, 1980
PUBLIC HEARINGS AND RELATED RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES (Cont.)
5. a. ORDINANCEi- (Continued for two weeks)
AMENDING CHAPTER 12.32
OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE
RELATING TO MAINTENANCE
OF LANDSCAPING BY
PROPERTY OWNERS OR
TENANTS - FIRST READING
6. PUBLIC HEARING - This being the time and place as advertised, Mayor Hyde
CONSIDERATION OF ASSESS- reopened the public hearing.
MENT FOR WALNUT AVENUE
1911 ACT ASSESSMENT Because of two written protests presented on April 1, 1980,
DISTRICT 79-1 (Continued the public hearing was continued and staff directed to
from 4/1/80) investigate and reevaluate the manner in which the assess-
ments were determined. The City Engineer said that based
on suggestions and advice of consulting assessment engineers
(experts in their field) staff revised the original assess-
ment figures for each parcel to account for odd-shaped
lots and to create a more equitable frontage charge. He
added that the two people who objected to the assessment
are willing to abide by the revised assessment spread.
Public hearing closed There being no further comments, either for or against, the
hearing was declared closed.
a. RESOLUTION NO. 10079 - Offered by Councilman Scott, the reading of the text was
CONFIRMING PROCEEDINGS waived by unanimous consent, passed and adopted by the
AND ASSESSMENT AND following vote, to-wit:
ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE AYES: Councilmen Scott, Gillow, Cox, Hyde, McCandliss
WALNUT AVENUE 1911 Noes: None
~CT ASSESSMENT Absent: None
DISTRICT 79-1
7. RESOLUTION NO. 10080 - In a written report, Director of Planning Peterson said
CERTIFYING ENVIRON~N- it is the policy o£ the State of California that a public
TAL IMPACT REPORT, agency should not approve a project if it would result
EIR-79-8, AND ADOPTING in a significant environmental impact, except when there
CEQA FINDINGS FOR are specific economic, social or technical reasons which
DEVELOPMENT OF RICE make it infeasible to mitigate the impact.
CANYON SECTIONAL PLAN-
NING AREA Mr. Peterson said that the EIR concluded there would be
significant environmental impact in three areas which
cannot be totally mitigated: (1) Land Form Alterations;
(2) Biology; and (3) Aesthetics. He stated the law
requires in this case that the Council adopt a statement
of overriding considerations before the project can be
considered. The resolution includes such a statement.
Mr. Peterson said the Planning Commission recommended
adoption o£ the statement of overriding considerations
and that the Council certify the EIR and make the additional
findings as outlined in the staff report.
Resolution offered Offered by Councilman Scott, the reading of the text was
waived by unanimous consent, passed and adopted by the
following vote, to-wit:
AYES: Councilmen Scott, GJllow, Cox, Hyde, McCandliss
Noes: None
Absent: None
Held Tuesday - 7:00 p.m. -5- May 6, 1980
PUBLIC HEARINGS AND RELATED RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES (Cont.)
8. PUBLIC HEARING - This being the time and place as advertised, Mayor Hyde
CONSIDERATION OF ZONING opened the public hearing.
3 ACRES OF UNZONED FREE-
WAY RIGHT OF WAY AT THE Director of Planning Peterson said this is a request to
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF 1-805 zone approximately 3 acres of excess freeway area located
AND EAST "H" STREET TO at the southeast quadrant of 1-805 and East "H" Street to
P-C Planned Community (P-C) zone. The property is presently
unzoned and has a width of 200 feet and an average depth
of 640 feet. The developers of Rice Canyon have been
negotiating with the State for acquisition of the property
and the State Department of Transportation has filed a
letter with the City confirming the proposed sale and
concurrence with the P-C zoning. Mr. Peterson said the
developer has incorporated the property into his plan as
part of the auto park with one acre reserved for a park-
and-ride facility.
Mr. Peterson noted that the Planning Commission recommended
the property be zoned P-C and that staff concurs.
Public hearing closed There being no further comments, either for or against,
the public hearing was declared closed.
a. ORDINANCE NO. 1908 - It was moved by Councilman Scott that the ordinance be
ZONING 3 ACRES AT THE placed on first reading, and that the reading of the text
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF be waived by unanimous consent. The motion carried by
1-805 AND EAST "H" STREET the following vote, to-wit:
TO P-C - FIRST READING
AYES: Councilmen Scott, Gillow, Cox, Hyde, McCandliss
Noes: None
Absent: None
9. PROPOSED EAST "H" In a written statement, the City Engineer noted that the
STREET DEVELOPMENT E1 Rancho del Rey Specific Plan requires that no lands
PROGRAM in certain Sectional Planning Areas (SPA) "...shall be
developed prior to the developers' submittal of a program
for the full construction of East "H" Street, between the
easterly limits of the Rice Canyon SPA and 0tay Lakes Road
and the Council's approval of such program.') He said the
Gersten Company bas submitted such a program which has
been reviewed hy the Engineering staff with the recommenda-
tion that: (1) the Council set a date for a Council
Conference in four weeks for a presentation by the Gersten
Company on their proposal; and (2) that no action be taken
tonight on the tentative map for Hidden Vista Village in
the Rice Canyon Sectional Planning Area.
Mayor Hyde stated that Items 9 and 10 on the agenda are so
closely related, it is staff's recommendation that they
be considered together.
Motion to consider It was moved by Councilman Scott, seconded by Conncilman
Items 9 and 10 together Cox and unanimously carried that the Council combine Items
9 and 10 for consideration since they are interrelated.
10. PUBLIC HEARING - This being the time and place as advertised, Mayor Hyde
CONSIDERATION OF DEVELOP- opened the public hearing.
MENT PLANS FOR RICE
CANYON SECTIONAL PLANNING Director of Planning Peterson outlined the proposed plan
AREA AND TENTATIVE SUB- for the development of the 419 acre Rice Canyon area of
DIVISION MAP FOR HIDDEN E1 Rancho del Rey Specific Plan located on the east side
VISTA VILLAGE of 1-805 in vicinity of East "H" Street. He noted that
this is the first step required under the Planned Community
zoning and in this ease also includes the submission of a
tentative map.
Held Tuesday - 7:00 p.m. -6- May 6, 1980
PUBLIC ki~ARINGSAND RELATED RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES (Cont.)
Director of Planning Mr. Peterson discussed major issues including (1) extension
comments of "H" Street offsite to Paseo del Rey intersection;
(2) the number of dwelling units proposed (1200); (3) the
size of the commercial development - approximately 31 acres
(20 for retail shopping center, 8 acres for the auto park,
and 3 acres for recreation); and (4) the land form altera-
tion - nearly one million cubic feet of earth must be moved.
Other issues are schools, undergrounding of utilities, and
low and moderate income housing.
City Engineer comments City Engineer Lippitt referred to the requirement that
development not occur until a plan for "H" Street has been
submitted and approved. He briefly discussed the concerns
of how this was to be accomplished with a "fair share" paid
by all developments. He said that in setting up a reimburse-
ment district, the Watt Industries would be reimbursed if
their costs for offsite improvements to "H" Street exceeded
their "fair share." However, more work needs to be done
on the proposed program and staff is recommending that the
entire matter be continued until May 22.
Comments of Current Current Planning Director Lee, using visual aids, discussed
Planning Director the proposed development in detail including the following:
Density; commercial development; parking; low and moderate
income area; condominium and single family units; develop-
ment phasing; circulation patterns; access from Lynwood
Drive and Bonita Road; bike lanes; schools; alteration of
land form; undergrounding requirements; architectural treat-
ment; and landscaping.
Council discussion Discussion ensued between the Council and staff concerning
the City Manager's concern over the small commercial area
in connection with sales tax revenues; landlocked property
of Helen Bishop and her request for an access road to the
west of the water tower; school facilities; emergency access
to the development; and drainage facilities (they should
improve the flooding situation at Bonita Road).
Mayor Hyde called for a five minute recess at this time.
Request for Executive City Attorney Lindberg asked that the recess be extended to
Session include a brief Executive Session to discuss litigation
matters.
Motion for joint It was moved by Mayor Hyde, seconded by Councilman Cox and
Executive Session unanimously carried that an Executive Session be held
jointly by the Redevelopment Agency and the City Council
for matters concerning litigation.
EXECUTIVE SESSION The Council recessed to Executive Session at 9:00 p.m. and
the meeting reconvened at 9:15 p.m.
Dick Brown Mr. Brown said a comprehensive and complex proposal has
1050 Pioneer Way been developed on how "H" Street can be constructed from
E1Cajon 1-805 to Rutgers without using an assessment district or
(Representing the reimbursement district. He suggested the Council view the
Gersten Company) plan, evaluate it and make a decision before a major part
of the area is developed, lie stated they support the
recommendation of the staff for a continuance and in the
meantime, they will be ready to meet with Mr. Watt and
City staff at any time to discuss the plan.
Held Tuesday - 7:00 p.m. -7- May 6, 1980
PUBLIC HEARINGS AND RELATED RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES (Cont.)
Ray Watt Mr. Watt said he has reviewed the plan and they are "open
Watt Industries minded" about it, but would like to have time to under-
stand it. He explained that they have had several exten-
sions on financing from their New York lending institution
and are being pressed for commitments on development; there-
fore, they are requesting that the tentative map be approved
subject to working out the problems of "H" Street construc-
tion. He said he is meeting with representatives from
New York tomorrow, and will be glad to meet with staff and
Gersten representatives as soon as meetings can be scheduled.
Niek Slijk Mr. Slijk said he was speaking as a private citizen and
4450 Vista Nacion property owner in Lynwood area. He said residents in
Chula Vista this area are opposed to the access to Lynwood Drive as
it is not needed and they are asking that it not be part
of the plan even for emergency vehicles. He also asked,
as his personal request, that the housing development
immediately to the west of Vista Nacion [facing Lynwood
~ive) be limited to one story homes.
Jim Hutchison Mr. Hutchison stated he was representing Mr. Gil Dreyfuss
610 "A" Street and Mr. Larry Herman, owners of approximately 15 acres
San Diego at the southeast corner of Hidden Vista Village project.
(Civil Engineer) He said they would like to make sure the condition proposed
by the Planning Commission to provide access from "H"
Street to this ~roDerty is not deleted - the 15 acres are
landlocked. He also expressed concern that the access is
20 to 25 feet lower than shown on the pre-tentative map,
and it will create a problem if it is lowered any more.
Helen Bishop Ms. Bishop (owner of landlocked property adjacent to the
3604 Bonita Road development) said that the access as it is shown is on
Chula Vista property which the owner is not interested in developing.
She asked that the Watt Industries consider moving the
access to the west side of the water tower.
Mr. gcCabe said there will be time to discuss this before
grading is completed.
Peter Watry Mr. Watry discussed the drainage problem which may occur
81 Second Avenue since grading will take place all at once and development
Chula Vista will be slower. He said heavy rains could cause flooding
problems and the developer's responsibility ends at his
property line.
Control for flood Mayor Hyde noted that staff has indicated engineering for
problem the drainage can be designed to handle this problem.
Mr. Lippitt confirmed that the grading does provide for
siltation control and also the landscaping and phasing
plan should minimize the problem.
Jerry Valk Mr. Valk suggested that the "senior citizen" and "low
291Camino Vista Real income" housing not be mixed as this may create problems.
Chula Vista He questioned where the housing would be moved if the
commercial area is expanded; time limits for temporary
school facilities; area available for school is only 22
acres and may not be sufficient; and the need For additional
fire facility. He recommended that these matters be
checked into.
Gary McCabe Mr. McCabe discussed agreements with the Elementary and
McCabe Engineering ftigh School Districts; fire protection (in final stage of
(Representing Watt development, a three bedroom house with oversized garage
Industries) will be constructed for a fire station); the proposal for
connecting Lynwood Drive with the provision for street
reservation, including cash deposit; construction of steps
and ramps at the end of Vista Coronado; low and moderate
income housing phasing expedited; bond issue sold and
Water District hag funds available for water; conm~ercial
development and drainage.
Held Tuesday - 7:00 p.m. -8- May 6, 1980
PUBLIC HEARINGS AND RELATED RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES (Cont.)
Condition 22 - 5~r. McCabe referred to Condition 22 of Planning Commission
Planning Commission Resolution PCS-80-15 (page 8) and asked that the wording
Resolution PCS-80-15 "reimbursement or assessment" district be used with the
sentence to read: "...if a reimbursement district or
assessment district has been established prior to approval
of the final map..."
Objection to offsite Mr. McCabe offered objections to the "minimum requirements"
construction of "H" for construction of improvements and discussed in detail
Street their proposal for the construction of "H" Street. The
developer is ulanning full construction through his entire
ownership (Rice Canyon SPA), but is asking that the require-
ment to go 1/2 mile easterly offsite be deleted.
Undergrounding
requirements Mr. McCabe discussed the undergrounding requirements and
requested that this not be required for the 69KV lines as
there is no "cost benefit."
Condition lO-c Referring to Condition 10-c (page 5), Mr. McCabe asked that
(PCS-80-15) the second line be modified to read: "...Phase IV
shall require the construction of the south side of "H"
Street from street "K" to the easterly boundary of the
Rice Canyon SPA..." - deleting "Pasco del Rey." Also,
starting with the words "Outside the project boundaries..."
all reference to offsite construction of East "H" Street be
deleted and replaced with the words "to the easterly boundary
of the Rice Canyon SPA."
Condition 10-e In addition Mr. McCabe requested that Condition 10-e be
(PCS-80-1$) modified to delete reference to "...less credit for offsite
portions of street "H" - and place a period after "tentative
map" on line 3. As a final modification, Mr. McCabe wanted
all reference to offsite construction removed from Condition
23 (page 8) with this condition to read: "The developer
shall be responsible for the construction of East "H" Street
within the project boundaries as shown on the tentative map
and the phasing schedule referenced in condition 10."
Dick Brown Mr. Brown said if the Council may be considering approval
(Gersten Company) of the project, he would like an opportunity to go into
detail as to why they feel the Watt project has a responsi-
bility beyond their property lines for East "}1" Street. He
expressed concern that approval may be premature with
regard to the financing of the future construction of
"H" Street.
Councilman Scott noted the staff recoramendation that this
matter be continued. He said he would like to hear the
Gersten proposal prior to making a determination.
Motion to continue It was moved by Councilman Scott and seconded by Councilman
Items 9 and 10 Gillow that this item be held over for two weeks as recom-
mended by the staff.
Council discussion Council discussion ensued with staff concerning any problems
in continuing this matter, noting the developers financial
situation. City Attorney Lindberg advised that the motion
indicate the reason is for the purpose of resolving the
specific issues of "H" Street, otherwise approval could be
given tonight. Various dates were discussed and it was
the consensus that this be considered by the Council on
May 27.
Craig Beam, Attroney For clarification, Mr. Beam asked if it is the intention
225 Broadway of the Council to hold the mlblic hearing over for new
San Diego information. He noted that the Gersten proposal has not
been seen by other property owners.
-9- May 6, 1980
Held Tuesday - 7:00 p.m.
PUBLIC HEARINGS AND RELATED RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES (Cont.)
Ray Watt Mr. Watt said there will be many opportunities to work
Watt Industries out the problem of East "H" Street and they do have a
serious problem with financing the project. He urged the
Council to take action tonight with a conditional approval
as this is needed to go forward with the lender.
Motion withdrawn Councilman Scott withdrew his motion. Councilman Gillow
withdrew his second.
Mayor Hyde requested a ten minute recess to allow staff
time to recommend an appropriate course of action. The
Council concurred.
RECESS The Council recessed at 10:45 p.m. and reconvened at 10:55
p.m.
Council discussion Council discussion followed concerning other modifications
to the tentative map as discussed this evening. Mayor Hyde
referred to the City Manager's concerns regarding commercial
development, and said he concurred with regard to the re-
servation of the opportunity to reconsider the residential
development south of "H" Street and suggested that at the
time it is presented, the Council consider whether it is
more appropriate to have commercial zoning.
Motion to consider It was moved by Councilman Scott, seconded by Councilwoman
commercial development McCandliss and unanimously carried that at the time that
when appropriate - proposal comes before the Council, that a study be made
Condition 68 whether or not commercial is indeed needed at that phase.
Mayor Hyde noted that this condition would be number 68.
Motion to add It was moved by Councilman Cox, seconded by Councilman
Condition 69 Scott and unanimously carried that in the condition that
deals with the pedestrian access to Vista Coronado Drive,
that some verbage be put in about incorporating the use of
steps and ramps. (Condition 69.)
Watt Industries to In response to a query from Councilwoman McCandliss, Mr.
' consider request of McCabe said they will work on the request of Ms. Helen
Ms. Bishop Bishop for access to her property.
Request for waiver of On undergrounding the 69KV l~ne, in answer to a question
undergrounding so from Mayor Hyde, Mr. McCabe stated they will be asking for
be made a waiver.
Councilman Gillow said he uses Lynwood Drive frequently
and he believes it is a dangerous road and should not
lead to a high density area.
Motion to eliminate It was moved by Councilman Gillow and seconded by Council-
connection to Lynwood woman McCandliss that a connection not be provided there
Drive (from the development).
Council discussion Council discussion ensued concerning this connection being
set up as a reservation - not that it would be done; poor
intersection at Bonita Road and Lynwood Drive for
additional traffic which may create traffic hazard; it is
more important to provide flexibility for this connection
in case it is ever needed in the future.
Motion failed The motion failed by the following vote, to-wit:
Ayes: Councilman Gil low
NOES: Councilmen Cox, Hyde, McCandliss, Scott
Absent: None
Hold Tuesday - 7:00 p.m. -10- May 6, 1980
PUBLIC HEARINGS AND RELATED RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES (Cont.)
Motion to continuo It was moved by Mayor Hyde, socondod by Councilman Scott
public hoaring and and unanimously carriod that the public hoaring be continuod
approve tontativo map to Thursday, May 22, 1980, and that the tontativo map be
subjoct to conditions approved subject to the rovisions just adoptod and subjoct
to the appropriato modifications as to "H" Stroot offsite
improvomont conditions within 60 days.
10a. RESOLUTION NO. 10081 - Offorod by Mayor Hyde, the reading of the text was waivod
APPROVING PLANS FOR by unanimous consont, passod and adoptod by the following
RICE CANYON SECTIONAL vote, to-wit:
PLANNING AREA
AYES: Mayor Hyde, Councilmon McCandliss, Gillow, Cox,
Scott
Noes: Nono
Absont: None
b. RESOLUTION NO. 10081-A - Of£ered by Mayor ttyd¢, as amended, tho reading of the text
APPROVING TENTATIVE SUB- was waived by unanimous consent, passed and adopted by the
DIVISION MAP FOR HIDDEN following vote, to-wit:
VISTA VILLAGE (as amended)
AYES: Mayor Hyde, Councilmen McCandliss, Gillow, Cox,
Scott
Noes: None
Absent: None
Motion to continue It was moved by Mayor Hyde, seconded by Councilman Scott
tonight's meeting to and unanimously carried that in view of the late hour, this
Wednesday, May 7 meeting be continued to tomorrow evening (May 7) at 7:00 p.m.
in tho Council Chambers for consideration of the balance of
the agenda items.
REPORT OF THE CITY MANAGER
Budget schedule Mr. Cole said the proposed budget for I980-81 together with
distributed the budget message and schedule has been distributed and
suggested any modifications be made at the meeting on
Thursday.
Questions regarding A list of questions concerning growth management developed
growth management by Director of Planning Peterson was distributed to the
Council by the City Manager for the Council Conference on
Thursday, May 8.
ADJOURNMENT Mayor }~de adjourned the meeting at 11:20 p.m. to the
meeting tomorrow at 7:00 p.m. (May 7) and to the meeting
scheduled for Hay 8 at 4:00 p.m.
JENNIE M. FULASZ, CMC
CITY CLERK
Deputy City Clerk
MINUTES OF ~kN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
Held Tuesday, May 6, 1980
The City Council met in the Council Chan~ber at the Public Services
Building, 276 Fourth Avenue on the above date at 7:00 p.m. with
the following
Councilmen present: Hyde, Gillow, Cox, McCandliss, Scott
Councilmen absent: None
ADJOURNMENT
The Mayor adjourned the meeting at 11:20 p.m. until Wednesday,
Chamber,
May 7 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council X~f~e~m
Public Services Building,
xm~x~x~dn~, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, California.
I, Jennie M. Fulasz, City Clerk of the City of Chula Vista, DO
HEtLEBY CERTIFY that this is a full, true and correct copy of an order
by the City Council at tile meeting of May 6, 1980
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING ORDER
COUNTY OF S~ DIEGO ) ss OF ADJOU~N~.~NT OF ~ET!~G
CITY OF CHULA VISTA )
I, Jennie M. Fulasz, being first duly sworn depose and say :
That I am the duly chosen, qualified and acting City Clerk of the
City Council of the City of Chula Vista;
That the regular meeting of the Council of the City of
Chula Vista was held M~y 5. 1980
and said meeting was adjou, rned to the time and place specified in
the order of adjournment ATTACHED HERETO:
That on M~¥ 7, ]980 at the hour of 10:15 a.m
I posted a copy of said order at a conspicuous place on or near
the door of the place at which said me~ting of May 6~ 1980
was held.
../ Clerk
Subscribed and sworn to before me this
~~x??r!s N~O~,.V 18, 1983
Notary Public in and for said County
and State of California