Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2018-09-12 PC Agenda 41 CITY OF CHULA VISTA M,WE Planning Commission REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA PLANNING COMMISSION September 12, 2018 Council Chambers 6:00 p.m. Public Services Bldg A 276 Fourth Avenue CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL: Commissioners Anaya, Burroughs, Calvo, Milburn, Nava, Zaker and Chair Gutierrez MOTIONS TO EXCUSE: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND MOMENT OF SILENCE OPENING STATEMENT: 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: August 22, 2018 PUBLIC COMMENTS: An opportunity for members of the public to speak to the Planning Commission on any subject matter within the Commission's jurisdiction, but not an item on today's agenda. Each speaker's presentation may not exceed three minutes. CONSENT ITEMS: The Chair may entertain requests by staff to continue an agenda item. The Chair may also entertain a recommendation by a Commissioner to approve certain non-controversial agenda items as Consent items. Notwithstanding the foregoing, an agenda item listed as a Public Hearing may not be acted upon by the Commission as a Consent Item. Public Hearing items shall be heard by the Commission as a Public Hearing. Planning Commission Agenda September 12, 2018 Page 2 PUBLIC HEARINGS The following item(s) have been advertised as public hearing(s) as required by low. If you wish to speak on any item, please fill out a "Request to Speak"form (available in the lobby) and submit it to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting. 2. PUBLIC HEARING: DR17-0025; Design Review consideration of a 297-unit multi- family attached apartment complex with one-car garages, carports, open parking clubhouse/fitness center, and recreational areas with associated open space on an 8.7-acre site located in the Otay Ranch Village Two, Neighborhood R-12B, Planned Community District (RM2) Residential Multi-Family 2 zone (Project Applicant: Baldwin &Sons Project Manager: Caroline Young,Associate Planner Staff Recommendation: That the Planning Commission adopt the Resolution approving the proposed project, based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. OTHER BUSINESS 3. DIRECTOR'S REPORT: 4. COMMISSION COMMENTS: ADJOURNMENT to the next Regular Planning Commission Meeting on September 26, 2018, at 6:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers. Materials provided to the Planning Commission related to any open-session item on this agenda are available for public review at the City Housing Office, located in City Hall at 276 Fourth Avenue, Building 300, during normal business hours. In compliance with the AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT The City of Chula Vista requests individuals who require special accommodations to access, attend, and/or participate in a City meeting, activity, or service, contact Patricia Laughlin at (619)409-3575 (California Relay Service is available for the hearing impaired by dialing 711) at least forty-eight hours in advance of the meeting. ITEM 1 APPROVAL OF MINUTES AUGUST 22, 2018 CITY OF CHULA VISTA 11"It 11111 r ",111 Planning Commission Mina fes REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA PLANNING COMMISSION August 22, 2018 Council Chambers 6:00 p.m. Public Services Bldg A 276 Fourth Avenue CALL TO ORDER MEMBERS PRESENT: Commissioners Anaya (in at 6:07), Burroughs, Milburn, Nava, Zaker and Chair Gutierrez MEMBERS ABSENT: Commissioner Calvo MOTIONS TO EXCUSE: Burroughs/Milburn Vote: 5-0-2 (Anaya in at 6:07 p.m.) PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND MOMENT OF SILENCE OPENING STATEMENT: 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: July 11, 2018 MSC: Zaker/Nava Vote: 4-0-1-2 (Calvo absent, Anaya and Burroughs abstain) PUBLIC COMMENTS: An opportunity for members of the public to speak to the Planning Commission on any subject matter within the Commission's jurisdiction, but not an item on today's agenda. Each speaker's presentation may not exceed three minutes. Colin Parent, representing Circulate San Diego, gave a brief presentation on the Circulate Mobility Certification program for sustainable, transit-oriented communities. Project applications are reviewed by an independent team of volunteer land use and urban design experts. Projects are graded on an objective set of criteria including proximity to transit and accessibility for walking and bicycling, among other sustainable growth techniques. He also provided a flyer for the Commission's review Planning Commission Minutes August 32, ZO18 Page PUBLIC HEARINGS The following item(s) have been advertised ospublic heoring( ) as required bylaw. //you wish tospeak nn any item, please fill out o "Request toSpeak"form (available in the lobby) and submit/ttothe Board Secretary prior tothe meeting. 2. PUBLIC HEARING DR17-0807; Design Review consideration of three-story building totaling 37,780 square-feet, consisting of 50 senior apartment units with associated parking and open space on approximately O.91acres located at177Landis Avenue/178Third Avenue. Resolution DR17-0007 of the Planning Commission of the City of Chula Vista approving Design Review Permit tOconstruct a three- story building totaling 87,780 square-feet consisting Of 58 senior apartment units with associated parking and open space On approximately 0.91 acres located at 177 LandisAvenu2/I78 Third Avenue. Resolution CL]P17-0004 of the Planning Commission of the City of Chula Vista approving 8 Conditional Use Permit to construct 8 three-story building totaling 37,780 square-feet consisting of 58 senior apartment units with associated parking and Open space on approximately 0.91 acres located at 177 Landis AvenUe/l78Third Avenue. Applicant: Front Runner Investments U, LLC. Project Manager: Stan Donn, Senior Planner Staff Recommendation: That the Planning Commission adopt Resolutions DRl7'0OU7and CUP17-0004 approving the project, based on the findings and subject tothe conditions contained therein. Sr. Planner Stan Donn gave G slide presentation that included the project location map, views from north, south, east and west, in addition to the site plan, design/elevations and floor plans. This project is 8 37,780 sq.-ft building consisting Of5O units or senior housing with associated parking onO.91acres located 8t278Third Avenue. Staff Recommendation: That the Planning Commission adopt Resolutions DRl7-OOO7and CUP17-0004 approving the project, based On the findings and subject tOthe conditions contained therein. Planning Commission Minutes August 22, 2018 Page 3 COMMISSIONER QUESTIONS TO STAFF • The footprint of the building looks rectangular; the lot looks L-shaped • What material is the dark siding made of? • What kind of fencing is proposed as a separation on the north side? • What is happening to the rest of the property facing E Street? • Is there any requirement for walls or separation between multi-family units and another multi-family unit or senior housing? OPENED PUBLIC HEARING Chip Crandall of Front Runner Investments 1, LLC spoke about what a good experience he had in working with staff, especially Sr. P1amler Donn. Everyone from front counter staff to Councilperson Aguilar was helpful and kind. CLOSED PUBLIC HEARING COMMISSIONER DELIBERATIONS Milburn: Has there been any accommodations made for bicycle storage? Crandall: Has another senior building and no one has a bike or asked for bike storage Anaya: Is pleased that we are providing housing for the age population. For the record, there were several residents voicing concerns regarding parking. He is confident that staff is working on a larger project that will address parking within this corridor. Looking at the population and the fact that cars will or will not be used in the future, he is ok with the parking. Supports the project. Gutierrez: We have a population in San Diego that is aging and we have to address the accommodation of all populations. Appreciates that the developer is thinking of a cohesive design of the surrounding project. Noticed that staff and developer has had workshops with the public and, because there are no residents in attendance, believes that the outreach has addressed the concerns. Zaker: The Commission is here to provide a platform for the public to voice their concerns. Is surprised that with the number of e-mails received, there is no one from the public in attendance. He lives close and there is always a little inconvenience and trade-off with density and likes to see this type of project moving forward. He asked the attorney about the deed restriction on the 62+ age limit and wanted to know if the deed restriction would continue if the property was sold. Shirey: His office is working on that and it will be recorded and will run with the property so that if it is sold, it will still be a restricted to senior complex. Planning Commission Minutes August 22,2018 Page 4 Zaker: Is this a market-rate property or subsidized? Crandall: It is a market-rate property—mostly due to the fact of the amount of time and effort to become a subsidized property. The vision is simple the way it's formed. Seniors (age restricted) can only afford a certain amount. He expounded on the benefits of having seniors and not having to raise the rents out of sight for them. Milburn: Addressed the parking situation and is aware of the problems because he lives in the area. However, he doesn't think the issue is with this particular issue or developer. Feels it is more with the state requirements which the city has met. Spoke about the entrances on Third and also Landis Streets and the parking on Landis. Noted that the lack of attendance from the public speaks to the good job that staff has done in addressing the situations. Anaya: Drives by this site often and noticed when the building was torn down that the graffiti started immediately and was taken care of immediately. He thanked the developer and/or property owner for being and staying on top of that. ACTION: Motion to approve by Anaya; Second by Milburn VOTE: 6-0-1 (Calvo absent) OTHER BUSINESS 3. ELECTION OF OFFICERS Chairman: Burroughs nominated Gabe Gutierrez; Seconded by Milburn Vote: 5-0-1-1 Vice-Chair: Zaker nominated Anaya; Seconded by Gutierrez Vote: 5-0-1-1 4. DIRECTOR'S REPORT: There was none 5. COMMISSION COMMENTS: Gutierrez: Saw the number of e-mails and responses and expected a large, heated crowd. Thanked staff for the amount of work they put in to avoid that situation. There was some conversation about the aversion of the problem. Zaker: Wanted to know time-line of parking study. Power: It's going to take a year with all the studies, etc. Zaker: Asked about the Third & K project and an update. Attorney: There has been litigation for well over a year and there has been an appeal to the decision—which should be heard soon. Planning Commission Minutes August 22,2018 Page 5 Zaker: Is there something that can be done with the corner until things are settled? Perhaps a Community Garden, Power: We could look into the rules and the owner would have to be amenable. If there's trash, could see that Code Enforcement looks in to it. There was some Commission discussion about this and other areas that are unsightly. They would like to see something done to improve the looks of the areas. ADJOURNMENT at 6:55 p.m. to the next Regular Planning Commission Meeting on September 12, 2018, at 6:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers. CHULA VISTA PLANNING COMMISSION ' ? AGENDA STATEMENT Item: 2 Meeting Date: 9/12/18 ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing: DR17-0025; Design Review consideration of a 297-unit multi-family attached apartment complex with one-car garages, carports, open parking clubhouse/fitness center, and recreational areas with associated open space on an 8.7-acre site located in the Otay Ranch Village Two, Neighborhood R-12B, Planned Community District (RM2) Residential Multi-Family 2 zone (Project). Applicant: Baldwin & Sons Resolution of the City of Chula Vista Planning Commission approving a Design Review Permit, DRC17-0025 to construct a 297-unit multi- family attached apartment complex with one-car garages, carports, open parking, clubhouse/fitness center, and recreational areas with associated open space on an 8.7-acre site located in the Otay Ranch Village Two, Neighborhood R-12B. SUBMITTED BY: Caroline Young, Associate Planner REVIEWED BY: Kelly Broughton, Director of Development Services INTRODUCTION The Applicant has submitted a Design Review application for approval of the Project. The site is vacant and located within the Otay Ranch Village Two, Neighborhood R-12B (see Locator Map, Attachment 1). ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Director of Development Services has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the project was adequately covered in previously adopted Final Second Tier EIR (EIR-02-02), for the Otay Ranch Villages Two, Three and a Portion of Four Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan. No fiirther environmental review or documentation is required. RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission adopt the Resolution approving the proposed project, based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. Planning Commission September 12, 2018 DR 17-0025 Page No. 2 DISCUSSION: Project Site Characteristics: The 8.7-acre project site is located in the northwestern portion of the Otay Ranch Village 2 Neighborhood R-12B, on a vacant parcel south of Olympic Parkway and located at the intersection of La Media Road and Santa Venetia Street. Neighborhood R-12B is bordered on the north, south, and east by multi-family and single-family homes, and Fire Station No. 7 (Attachment 1, Locator Map). Summary of Surrounding Land Uses General Plan Zoning Current Land Use Site: Multi-Use Residential Planned Community Vacant South: Multi-Use Residential Planned Community Condos/Fire Station No. 7 North: Multi-Use Residential Planned Community Apartments East: Res. Low Medium Planned Community Single-Family Homes West: Multi-Use Residential Planned Community Apartments Project Description The proposal includes four (4) buildings consisting of six (6) different plan types ranging from 54-unit to 87-unit buildings. The buildings will be four-stories with a maximum height of 50-ft. consisting of 119 one-bedroom units, 120 two-bedroom units, and 58-three-bedroom units which are sized at approximately 764 square-feet to 1,430 square-feet for each unit. The proposed floor plans for all units include a living room, kitchen, bedroom, and patio/deck. Eighty-five units will have a one-car garage that is adjacent to the first-floor units. The recreation building is on the first and second floor of Building No. 3, consisting of amenities for the residents such as a yoga and fitness room, cabanas adjacent to the pool and spa, club/game lounge, kitchen, and an outdoor lounge area. There is also a leasing lounge, staff offices, and mail room. Spanish style architecture incorporates one color scheme with materials such as light colored stucco with dark colored decorative shutters and awnings, tiled roofs, decorative metal grill over stucco recess, decorative metal railing, tile insets, decorative shutters, covered patios, and arched openings. Required parking is provided onsite with 85 one-car garages, 196 carports, 189 standard parking spaces, 70 compact parking spaces, and 10 parking spaces for persons with disabilities. Onsite amenities include several open space areas throughout the project site consisting of a passive open space area in-between buildings with an amenity courtyard, internal courtyards, tot lot area, dog park, plaza area, and a recreation building with a pool and spa. There are several points of vehicle and pedestrian access on and off the site. Vehicles can access the site through two driveways, one along Santa Venetia Street and an internal driveway from the adjacent Montecito Village Apartment complex. Planning Commission September 12,2018 DR17-0025 Page No. 3 Compliance with Development Standards The following Project Data Table shows the development regulations along with the Applicant's proposal to meet said requirements: Assessor's Parcel Number: 644-310-53-00 Current Zoning: Planned Community, RM2 General Plan Designation: Mixed-Use Residential Lot Area: 8.7 acres PARKING REQUIRED: PARKING PROPOSED: Parking spaces,broken down as follows: One-bedroom unit: 1.50 space per unit Garage parking= 85 spaces 119 units x 1.50=179 spaces Carport parking--196 Standard parking--I 89 Two-bedroom unit: 2.0 space per unit Compact parking-70 120 units x 2.0=240 spaces Handicapped parking= 10 spaces Three-bedroom unit: 2.25 space per unit 58 units x 2.25=131 spaces Total: 550 parking spaces Total: 550 parking spaces SETBACKS/HEIGHT REQUIRED: SETBACKS/HEIGHT PROPOSED: Front: Subject to Design Review 15 feet Side: Subject to Design Review 22 & 34 feet Rear: Subject to Design Review 118 feet Height: 60 feet (4 story max) 50 feet (4 story) ANALYSIS: Compliance with Otay Ranch Village 2 Design Guidelines Architectural Theme The Village Two SPA Design Plan identifies Santa Barbara, California as the design inspiration for the Village of Montecito (Village Two). As a fitndamental component of the village, the architecture of the proposed multi-family development is focused primarily on the Santa Barbara/Montecito design theme. Although not mandated, preferred architectural styles for multi-family development include Spanish Eclectic and Spanish Mission to complement the design theme of the remainder of the village. Neighborhood R-12 is within the Village of Montecito and its architecture is consistent with the policies of the Village Design Plan. The proposed `Montecito Style' architecture includes light colored smooth finish stucco with dark colored decorative shutters and awnings, tiled roofs, decorative metal grill over stucco recess, decorative metal railing, tile insets, decorative shutters, covered patios, and arched openings. Planning Commission September 12,2018 DR 17-0025 Page No. 4 Throughout Otay Ranch, enhanced elevations are required where developments are visible from public rights-of-way as well as pedestrian areas. This regulation is stipulated in the Village Two Planned Community (PC) District regulations. Typically, shutters, pop-outs, covered decks, and window surrounds were used to meet these standards in previous villages, but these features have become standard in Village Two. Enhanced elevations should include varying building elements, roof pitches, and setbacks to avoid monotony. In addition, distinctive building elements shall be oriented toward the comers of prominent village core and entry street intersections. Street facing facades shall incorporate a range of scale-defining elements that relate larger building masses to the scale of the pedestrian. Elements may include trellises, columns, archways, doorways, porches or patios and upper floor balconies and windows. Site Planning and Building Placement/Orientation The Village Design Plan includes guidelines and policies that ensure that multi-family residential buildings will contribute to the pedestrian-oriented "Village Concept" established in the General Development Plan (GDP). Policies relating to pedestrian connections, building orientation, landscaping buffers, enhanced elevations and vehicular access are listed in each document to implement the visions of these documents. Specific design guidelines for multifamily homes include: • Site planning which focuses on the pedestrian and orients entries towards Village streets and minimizes views to garages and parking areas. • Architecture focused primarily on the Santa Barbara design theme. • Optimize architecture on the street frontage. • Building elevations that are visible from public view areas (all Village streets, surrounding arterial streets and public open spaces) shall be articulated with elements such as wall offsets, balconies, and windows, appropriate to the architectural style. • Street facing facades shall incorporate a range of scale-defining elements that relate larger building masses to the scale of the pedestrian. Elements may include trellises, columns, archways, doorways,porches or patios and upper floor balconies and windows. • The interiors of multi family residential projects shall provide for common and private outdoor spaces that are,functional and aesthetically pleasing. The pedestrian features throughout the site meet the intent of the Village Design Plan. The proposal includes pedestrian walkways throughout and connection to surrounding streets. The plan also includes pedestrian linkage from the enhanced courtyard areas to the central pool area. Within the active open space area, several pedestrian features are provided such as a tot lot, dog Planning Commission September 12,2018 DR 17-0025 Page No. 5 park, and internal courtyard areas with a seat wall, BBQ and a fire table for pedestrians to enjoy. The project also uses extensive landscape and landscape buffering to create a more enjoyable pedestrian environment. In order to comply with the building siting polices and guidelines included in the Village Two Design Plan, buildings have been oriented to address public streets. Buildings at high profile intersections — such as La Media Road and Santa Venetia Road are designed to include special, landmark features such as tower elements and other attractive architectural detailing, consistent with the Montecito palette. While pedestrian access is the most significant feature in the villages of Otay Ranch, vehicular access is also important in order to offer a variety of ways to access different areas of Village 2. Dispersion of automobile traffic also has the effect of making areas more pedestrian friendly as cars and pedestrians have less direct interaction. The proposed project is an extension of the existing R12B development to the west and an internal driveway is already provided in between the two sites as well as a separate driveway off of Santa Venetia Street. Landscape All new landscaping will be in accordance with City of Chula Vista guidelines including the Otay Ranch Village 2 Landscape Master Plan, City of Chula Vista Landscape Water Conservation Ordinance and City of Chula Vista Grading Ordinance. The design theme of `Santa Barbara' or `Montecito' is enhanced with landscaping through 1) selection of trees that are appropriate to the climate; 2) providing filtered shade for pedestrians; 3) creation of horizontal planes from canopy trees and shrub forms; and 4) use of vertical elements such as narrow trees, decorative fencing, and light features which provide contrast to long architectural planes. Attractive, appropriate landscape will be provided in a series of pedestrian-oriented features such as courtyards, seating areas, barbeque areas, a toddler tot-lot, a pool and recreation area, and an enhanced entry. Additionally, landscaping will be used to provide a buffer from surrounding roadways. Parking Village 2 SPA regulations require 1.5 spaces for one-bedroom units, 2.0 spaces for two bedroom units and 2.25 for three bedroom units. Therefore, the required parking is 550 spaces. A variety of parking is provided, such as a total of 85 one-car garages, 196 carports, 189 standard parking spaces, 70 compact parking spaces, and 10 parking spaces for the disabled. The project meets the required parking requirement and provides all of the parking spaces on-site. CONCLUSION The proposed 297-unit multi-family attached apartment complex project is a permitted land use in the Otay Ranch GDP and is permitted in the Residential Multi-Family Two (RM2) district of the Village Two SPA Plan. The proposal complies with the policies, guidelines and design standards for the Village Two Design Plan. Therefore, staff recommends the Planning Commission approve Design Review Permit, DR17-0025. Planning Commission September 12,2018 D R 17-0025 Page No. 6 DECISION-MAKER CONFLICTS Staff has reviewed the property holdings of the Planning Commission members and has found no property holdings within 500 feet of the boundaries of the property which is the subject of this action. Consequently, this item does not present a disqualifying real property-related financial conflict of interest under California Code of Regulations Title 2, section 18705.2(a)(11), for purposes of the Political Reform Act (Cal. Gov't Code §87100, et seq.). Staff is not independently aware, and has not been informed by any PlaJming Commission member, of any other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter. FISCAL IMPACT All processing costs are borne by the Applicant, resulting in no net fiscal impact to the General Fund or Development Services Fund. Attachments 1. Locator Map 2. Planning Commission Resolution DR17-0025 3. Disclosure Statement 4. Project Plans J:APlanning\CarolineADiscretionary Permits\OR VLG 2 R-12B\DR17-0025PC Staff report PROTECT LOOZION MONTEDI:TO VILLAGE 7 APA41RTMENTS I , ''E W`: FIFE OLYMPIC + �'�s STATKW 7 HIGH.SCHOOL .t AMLA 8C3 Cep ROSINA VIS A APARTtiAMS CHULA VISTA DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTME-NT LOCATOR FR"cT Saidwirt&Sons cxi ibEsctt>Pironc Montecho MI*lage DItSIGN REVIEW PROACT INWC La Media&Sante Venetla St ADDRESS', d PtSummary.,wpow ix U Unit a rnent Campy, I N OU,�ibtess cerMr W th dss ed Tar&Open spam. sem: FU Wul aEK. NORTH No Scale DR17.0025 cases:None ref' 9 tftlNcxak#Wrt?OG15kdrir000s Ek10,4I 071917 Attachment 1 RESOLUTION NO. DR17-0025 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING A DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT, DR17-0025 TO CONSTRUCT A 297-UNIT MULTI-FAMILY ATTACHED APARTMENT COMPLEX WITH ONE-CAR GARAGES, CARPORTS, OPEN PARKING, CLUBHOUSEIFITNESS CENTER, AND RECREATIONAL AREAS WITH ASSOCIATED OPEN SPACE ON AN 8.7 ACRE SITE LOCATED IN OTAY RANCH VILLAGE TWO,NEIGHBORHOOD R-12B. WHEREAS, on June 29, 2017, a duly verified application for a Design Review Permit was filed with the City of Chula Vista Development Services Department by Baldwin & Sons (Applicant); and WHEREAS, the application requests approval of a Design Review Permit to allow construction of a 297-unit multi-family attached apartment complex with one-car garages, carports, open parking, clubhouse/fitness center, and recreational areas with associated open space on an 8.7 acre site located in Otay Ranch Village Two, Neighborhood R-12B (Project); and WHEREAS, the area of land that is the subject of this Resolution is an existing parcel located in Otay Ranch Village Two,Neighborhood R-12B (Project Site); and WHEREAS, The Director of Development Services has reviewed the Project for compliance with the California Envirolnnental Quality Act (CEQA) and deterinined that the Project was covered by previously adopted Final Second Tier EIR (EIR-02-02) for the Otay Ranch Villages Two, Three and a Portion of Four Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan. Therefore, no further enviromnental review or documentation is required; and WHEREAS, the Director of Development Services set the time and place for a hearing on the Design Review Permit application, and notice of the hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City and its mailing to property owners and residents within 500 feet of the exterior boundaries of the property at least 10 days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the Planning Commission and the hearing was thereafter closed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Chula Vista that it hereby makes the following findings: 1. That the proposed Project is consistent with the development regulations of the Village Two Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan and Planned Community (PC) District Regulations. Attachment 2 PC Resolution DR 17-0025 September 12, 2013 Page 2 Neighborhood R-12B is designated Residential Multi-Family (RM2) in the PC District regulations of the Otay Ranch Village Two SPA Plan. The proposed multi-family use is permitted and meets all of the development regulations as stipulated in the Otay Ranch Village Two PC District Regulations as conditioned. The allowable density on the site is a total of 300 units and the Applicant's proposal includes 297 units. Some units will have a one-car garage that is adjacent to the first floor units. The project requires 550 parking spaces, which are provided by 85 one-car garages, 196 carports, 189 standard parking spaces, 70 compact parking spaces, and 10 parking spaces for the disabled located onsite. The total building height of the four-story residential buildings is 50- ft., whereas the maximum building height in accordance with the Residential Guidelines is 60-ft. The lot area, floor area ratio, and setback requirements are subject to Design Review (DR). 2. The proposed Project is consistent with the design and development standards of the Otay Ranch Village Two SPA Design Plan. The Project is in compliance with the Multi-Family Design Guidelines of the Otay Ranch Village Two SPA Design Plan and is consistent with the SPA density requirements. Enhanced architectural details are proposed along the street elevations and the layout of the site provides for a pedestrian oriented design in accordance with the Otay Ranch Village 2 SPA Plan. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission, based on the findings above, hereby approves the Design Review Permit subject to the following conditions: 1. The following shall be accomplished to the satisfaction of the Development Services Director, or designee, prior to issuance of Building Pennits,unless otherwise specified: Planning Division 1. Prior to, or in conjunction with the issuance of the first Building Pennit, the Applicant shall pay all applicable fees, including any unpaid balances of permit processing fees for deposit account DQ-1652. 2. The colors and materials specified on the building plans shall be consistent with the colors and materials shown on the site plan and materials board approved by the Planning Commission. 3. A graffiti resistant treatment shall be specified for all wall and building surfaces. This shall be noted for any building and wall plans and shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Development Services prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Additionally, the Project shall conform to Chapter 9.20 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code (CVMC) regarding graffiti control. PC Resolution DR]7-0025 September 12,2018 Page 3 4. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Development Services Director. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Development Services Director. 5. All ground mounted utility appurtenances such as transfonners, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Development Services Director. 6. All exterior lighting shall include shielding to remove any glare from adjacent residents. Details for said lighting shall be included in the architectural plans and shall be reviewed and approved to the satisfaction of the Development Services Director, prior to the issuance of the first Building Permit. 7. The Applicant shall obtain approval of a sign permit for each sign by the Development Services Department. Signs shall comply with all applicable requirements of the CVMC. Land Development Division/Landscape Architecture Division 8. The following fees may be adjusted based on the final Building Plans submitted: a. Sewer Connection and Capacity Fees b. Traffic Signal Fees c. Park Acquisition and Development (PAD) Fees d. Public Facilities Development Impact Fees (PFDIF) e. Eastern Transportation Development Impact Fees (WTDIF) f. Other Engineering Fees as applicable per the City's Master Fee Schedule. 9. Additional deposits or fees in accordance with the City Subdivision Manual, and Master Fee Schedule will be required for the submittal of the following items: a) Grading Plans b) Street Improvement Plans c) Construction Permit d) Tentative Map, and Final Map 10. The Applicant shall enter into a Storm Water Management Facilities Maintenance Agreement to perpetually maintain private BMP's located within the project prior to issuance of any Grading or Building Permits, whichever occurs first. 11. Payment of the Park Acquisition and Development (PAD) fee per dwelling unit is required prior to the issuance of the first Building Permit in accordance with CVMC 17.10. 100. The PAD fee is adjusted on an annual basis on October 1 based on the Engineer Construction Cost Index. The payment of PAD fee amount in place at the time of the recording of the Final Map is required. Credit will be awarded for existing buildings on the site. PC Resolution DR 17-0025 September 12, 2018 Page 4 12. The Applicant shall submit duplicate copies of all commercial, industrial or multifamily Projects in digital format, such as (DXF) graphic file, on a CD or through e-mail based on California State Plane Coordinate System (NAD 83, Zone 6) in accordance with the City's Guidelines for Digital Submittal. DXF file shall include a utility plan showing any and all proposed sewer or stone drain on site. 13. All driveways shall conform to the City of Chula Vista's sight distance requirements in accordance with Section's 12.12.120 and 12.12.130 of the CVMC. Also, landscaping, street furniture, or signs shall not obstruct the visibility of motorist's at street intersections or driveways. 14. Streets or driveways within the complex shall be designated as private. 15. The Applicant must obtain a Land Development Permit prior to beginning any earthwork activities at the site and before issuance of Building Permits in accordance with CVMC Title 15.04. The Applicant shall submit Grading Plans in confomlance with the City's Subdivision Manual and the City's Development Storm Water Manual requirements, including, but not limited to the following: a. Grading Plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer. b. Drainage Study and Geotechnical/Soils Investigations are required with the first submittal of Grading Plans. The Drainage Study shall calculate the Pre- Development and Post-Development flows and show how downstream properties and storm drain facilities are impacted. Design shall incorporate detention of storm water runoff if Post-Development flows exceed Pre-Development flows; analysis shall include flows from 2 yr, 10 yr, and 50 yr return frequency storms. c. Drainage study shall also demonstrate that no property damage will occur during the 100-year storm event. d. All onsite drainage facilities shall be private. e. Any offsite work will require Letters of Pennission from the property owner(s). 16. The Applicant shall provide 2 copies of the following technical reports with the 1st submittal of Grading Plans: a. Drainage Study b. Storm Water Quality Management Plan (SWQMP) c. Geotechnical Report 17. Improvement Plans in conformance with the City's Subdivision Manual and a Construction Permit will be required prior to issuance of any Building Permits. The Improvement Plans shall include but not be limited to: a. Sewer lateral and storm drain connections to existing public utilities. Utilities Trenching and Restoration shall be installed in accordance with CVCS-3 & 4. The Public Works Operations Section will need to inspect any existing sewer laterals PC Resolution DR 17-0025 September 12,2018 Page 5 and connections that are to be used by the new development. Laterals and connections may need replacement as a result of this inspection. 18. The onsite sewer and storm drain system shall be private. All sewer laterals and storm drains shall be privately maintained from each building unit to the City-maintained public facilities. 19. Separate permits for other public utilities (gas, electric, water, cable, telephone) shall be required, as necessary. 20. Any private facilities (if applicable) within Public right-of-way or City easements will require an Encroachment Pen-nit prior to Improvement Plan or Building Permit approval. 21. All proposed sidewalks, walkways, pedestrian ramps, and disabled parking shall be designed to meet the City of Chula Vista Design Standards, ADA Standards, and Title 24 standards, as applicable. 22. The proposed driveway on Santa Venetia Street shall have right-in/right-out turning movements only to alleviate traffic concerns along Santa Venetia Street. 23. Prior to the approval of the first Building Permit, the Applicant shall submit full Landscaped and Irrigations Plans for review and approval by the City's Landscape Architect. Fire Department 24. For 134,588 square feet of Type V-A construction, the Project will require a fire flow of 4,875 gallons per minute for a 4-hour duration measured at 20 p.s.i. Chula Vista Fire Department (CVFD) staff will produce and send a water letter to the respective water authority to detennine if the fire flow demand is available. 25. Based upon the required fire flow for Type V-A construction type, a minimum of 7 fire hydrant(s)is required to serve the Project. 26. Where the site requires more than (2) fire hydrants a second point of connection is required. 27. Fire Hydrants shall be located and spaced in accordance with California Fire Code, Appendix C. Based upon the required fire flow for this project, fire hydrants shall be located with an average spacing of 250 feet. The maximum distance from any point along a fire apparatus access road to a fire hydrant shall not exceed 150 feet. Existing fire hydrants can be considered to meet spacing requirements. 28. Where a portion of the building is more than 400 feet from a fire hydrant on a fire apparatus access road, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building, on site fire hydrants and mains shall be provided. All exteriors walls of a building shall be within 400 feet of a fire hydrant. PC Resolution DRI 7-0025 September 12,2018 Page 6 29. The Civil Engineer who designed the water system shall certify that this water system is in accordance with the requirements as prescribed by the Chula Vista Fire Prevention Division, the CFC and NFPA 24. This certificate shall be accomplished with a wet stamp and signature on the submitted plans. 30. Underground fire service shall be provided with thrust blocks and/or restraint to prevent movement of piping. Plans shall indicate locations of thrust blocks and compliance with CVFD standard detail for thrust blocks. If restraint is used, all supporting documentation shall be included on plans. 31. The Applicant shall provide class 235 piping for all underground fire service utilities for systems with pressures that does not exceed 150 p.s.i. Systems that exceed 150 p.s.i shall be provided with class 305 pipe. 32. A fire service study shall be performed for the new fire water distribution system, which includes a hydraulic water flow analysis. This analysis shall show the actual flow and pressure for all hydrants and riser stubs. The Hazen Williams formula shall be used in the determination of these flows and pressures. The analysis shall show that the required fire flow is available at the hydrants and that, independently, the sprinkler demand is available at the most demanding sprinkler riser. 33. The Applicant shall provide a deferred submittals section/note that indicates the following: Plans for the design and installation of the fire protection system(s) are a deferred submittal and shall be submitted and approved, prior to any installation work, to CVFD Fire Prevention Division located at 276 Fourth Ave, Bldg. C. (619) 691-5029" List the systems to be submitted. Il. The following on-going conditions shall apply to the Project Site as long as it relies on this approval: 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans, which include site plans, floor plan, and elevation plan on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, and Title 19. 2. The Applicant shall install and maintain all landscaping and hardscape improvements in accordance with the approved Landscape Plan. 3. Approval of the Design Review Permit shall not waive compliance with any sections of Title 19 of the CVMC, nor any other applicable laws and regulations in effect at the time of Building Pen-nit issuance. 4. The Property Owner and Applicant shall and do agree to indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless City, its City Council members, Planning Commission members, officers, employees and representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands, claims and costs, including court costs and attorney's fees (collectively, liabilities) PC Resolution DR 17-0025 September 12,2018 Page 7 incurred by the City arising, directly or indirectly, from (a) City's approval and issuance of this Design Review Permit and (b) City's approval or issuance of any other permit or action, whether discretionary or non-discretionary, in connection with the use contemplated on the Project Site. The Property Owner and Applicant shall acknowledge their agreement to this provision by executing a copy of this Design Review Permit where indicated below. The Property Owner's and Applicant's compliance with this provision shall be binding on any and all of the Property Owner's and Applicant's successors and assigns. 5. This Design Review Permit shall become void and ineffective if not utilized within three years from the effective date thereof, in accordance with Section 19.14.600 of the Municipal Code. III. GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 66020 NOTICE Pursuant to Govermnent Code Section 66020(d) (1), NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the 90 day period to protest the imposition of any impact fee, dedication, reservation, or other exaction described u1 this Resolution begins on the effective date of this Resolution and any such protest must be in a manner that complies with Government Code Section 66020(a) and failure to timely follow this procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void or annul imposition. The right to protest the fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions does not apply to planning, zoning, grading, or other similar application processing fees or service fees in connection with this project; and it does not apply to any fees, dedication, reservations, or other exactions which have been given notice similar to this, nor does it revive challenges to any fees for which the Statute of Limitations has previously expired. IV. EXECUTION OF RESOLUTION OF APPROVAL The Property Owner and Applicant shall execute this document signing on the lines provided below, indicating that the Property Owner and Applicant have each read, understood and agreed to the conditions contained herein, and will implement same. Upon execution, this document shall be signed and returned to the City's Development Services Department. Signature of Property Owner Date Printed Name of Property Owner Signature of Applicant Date Printed Name of Applicant PC Resolution DR 17-0025 September 12,2018 Page 8 V. CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE OF CONDITIONS If any of the foregoing conditions fail to occur, or if they are, by their terns, to be implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so implemented and maintained according to their tends, the City shall have the right to revoke or modify all approvals herein granted, deny, or further condition issuance of all fiiture building permits, deny, revoke, or further condition all certificates of occupancy issued under the authority of approvals herein granted, institute and prosecute litigation to compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. Failure to satisfy the conditions of this permit may also result in the imposition of civil or criminal penalties. VI. INVALIDITY; AUTOMATIC REVOCATION It is the intention of the Planning Commission that its adoption of this Resolution is dependent upon the enforceability of each and every teen, provision and condition herein stated; and that in the event that any one or more terms, provisions or conditions are detennined by a Court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, this resolution and the permit shall be deemed to be automatically revoked and of no further force and effect. Presented by: Approved as to form by: Kelly G. Broughton, FASLA Glen R. Googins Director of Development Services City Attorney PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, this 12th day of September 2018, by the following vote, to-wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Gabe Gutierrez, Chair ATTEST: Pat Laughlin, Board Secretary D e v e l o P m e n t S e r v 1 c e s D e p a r t m e n t Planning Division I Development Processing CITY OF CHUIA'VISIA APPLICATION APPENDIX B Disclosure Statement Pursuant to City Council Policy 101-01,prior to any action on a matter that requires discretionary action bythe City Council, Planning Commission or other official legislative body of the City,a statement of disclosure of certain ownerships,financial interest, payments,and campaign contributions must be filed. The following information must be disclosed: 1. List the names of all persons having a financial interest in the project that is the subject of the application,project or contract(e,g,,owner,applicant,contractor,subcontractor,material supplier), 2. If any person* identified in section 1.above is a corporation or partnership,list the names of all individuals with an investment of$2000 or more in the business(corporation/partnership) entity. Steve Baldwin Al Baldwin 3. If any person* identified in section 1.above isa non-profit organization or trust,list the names of any person who is the director of the non-profit organization or the names of the trustee, beneficiary and trustor of the trust, N/A 4. Please identify every person, including any agents,employees,consultants,or independent contractors,whom you have authorized to represent you before the City in this matter. Nick Lee Tori Massie Maria Miller S. Has any person*identified in 1.,2.,3.,or 4,,above, or otherwise associated with this contract, project or application, had any financial dealings with an Official"of the City of Chula Vista as it relates to this contract,project or application within the past 12 months? Yes No X If yes,briefly describe the nature of the financial interest the official"may have in this contract. N/A Portn 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista California 91910 (619) 691,5101 Pg 112 > Attachment 3 ` . ' Deve | opment Servicer Oepartment trl_�� Planning Division | Development Processing CITY Or ,CHQL4\/ISTA APPLICATION APPENDIX B Disclosure Statement - Page 6. Has any person*identified in l.,2,3,or4,above,orotherwise associated with this contractprojecto,opp|icahon, madeacompaigncontr/buUuno[morethan $Z50withinthepmst(13) munth~contract,project current member ofthe City v[Chula Vista Cound|7 Yes No ifyeg which council member? ____________________________ -----.____ ---- 7. Has any person*Identified |n1.'2,3.'or4,above,orotherwise associated with this contmct project oropp|ica�on,provided more than $42O(or mn Item ofequivalent value)toan ofMdo|°°ofthe City of Chula Vista |nthe past(12) months? (This includes any payment that confers apersonal benefit onthe recipient,arebate ordiscount|nthe price ofanything ofvalue, money mretire alegal debt, ft |na» etc.) Yes_'--_ No_____ »' ' If yes,which of cbp° and what was the nature ofthe item provided? / S. Has any person*Identified in 2.,3.,or 4.,above,or otherwise associated with this contract,project ornppUcotion,heenuxourceof|ncnmeuf$50OmrmuretoanoKcia|°°oftheCityo[[hu|aV1stainthe < past(12) munths7 Yes No 1 If yes,which officiap° and the nature ofthe item provided? � __�_-------____-------_—___-____-'_---_-__----___'—_'----__ ___------- Date 06/21/2017 _ Signature of ----------- zori Massie Print ortype name vfContractor/Applicant ° Person isidentified as:any individual,firm,cu-partnernhip,joint venture,aosudot|on social club, �aternn|o/gan|zaUu/�corpomtimn,eotate,trus� e � ceivcsynJ|cate,anyothe/coun``'�icity, munidpaUty, d|atrictorotherpoUdca| subdivbinn'oranynrhergrouporcom6inadmnacting asait. ' ** official includes, but isnot limited to: Mayor,Council member, Planning Commissioner,k4emberofa board,commission or committee of the City,and City employee or staff members. **� This disclosure Statement must be completed atthe time the project application,or contract,bsubmitted to. City staff for processing,and updated within one week prior to consideration by legislative body. Last Updated: March 16.2010 2/6 Fourth Avenue | Chula Vista California| | 97e10 ! (619) 691,5101 '