Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 2018_08_14City of Chula Vista Agenda Mary Casillas Salas, Mayor Patricia Aguilar, Councilmember Mike Diaz, Councilmember John McCann, Councilmember Stephen C. Padilla, Councilmember Gary Halbert, City Manager Glen R. Googins, City Attorney Kerry K. Bigelow, City Clerk Council Chambers 276 4th Avenue, Building A Chula Vista, CA 91910 5:00 PMTuesday, August 14, 2018 REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL: Councilmembers Aguilar, Diaz, McCann, Padilla and Mayor Casillas Salas PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG AND MOMENT OF SILENCE SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY PRESENTATION BY SWEETWATER AUTHORITY GENERAL MANAGER TISH BERGE ON SECURING OUR WATER FUTURE 18-0296A.18-0296 SPECIAL RECOGNITION OF THE CHULA VISTA U17 REBELS ELITE SOCCER TEAM UPON WINNING THE U.S. YOUTH SOCCER NATIONAL TITLE 18-0377B.18-0377 Page 1 City of Chula Vista Printed on 8/9/2018 1 August 14, 2018City Council Agenda CONSENT CALENDAR (Items 1 - 13) The Council will enact the Consent Calendar staff recommendations by one motion, without discussion, unless a Councilmember, a member of the public, or staff requests that an item be removed for discussion. If you wish to speak on one of these items, please fill out a “Request to Speak” form (available in the lobby) and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. Items pulled from the Consent Calendar will be discussed immediately following the Consent Calendar. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 2.57 (DESIGN-BUILD CONTRACTS) TO AMEND THE AUTHORIZED PROCUREMENT AND SELECTION METHODS FOR DESIGN-BUILD PROJECTS (SECOND READING AND ADOPTION) 18-03821.18-0382 Engineering Department Department: The activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the activity qualifies for an Exemption pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines. Environmental Notice: Council adopt the ordinance. Recommended Action: ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 2.05.010 TO DELETE THE UNCLASSIFIED POSITION OF CONSTITUENT SERVICES REPRESENTATIVE (SECOND READING AND ADOPTION) (4/5 VOTE REQUIRED) 18-03832.18-0383 Human Resources Department Department: The activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required. Environmental Notice: Council adopt the ordinance. Recommended Action: Page 2 City of Chula Vista Printed on 8/9/2018 2 August 14, 2018City Council Agenda ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ADDING CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 2.63 - “MEASURE A” CITIZENS’ OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE (SECOND READING AND ADOPTION) 18-03843.18-0384 City Manager Department: The activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required. Environmental Notice: Council adopt the ordinance. Recommended Action: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING AN AGREEMENT FOR THE PREPARATION OF A MULTI-MODAL PEDESTRIAN/ BIKEWAY MASTER PLAN (CIP# STL0404) BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND CHEN RYAN ASSOCIATES 18-00434.18-0043 Engineering Department Department: The activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required. Environmental Notice: Council adopt the resolution. Recommended Action: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE SUBMITTAL OF GRANT APPLICATIONS FOR THE HIGHWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - CYCLE 9 THROUGH CALTRANS, AND STATING THE CITY'S ASSURANCE TO COMPLETE THE PROJECTS 18-01895.18-0189 Engineering Department Department: The Project qualifies for a Categorical Exemption pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines Section 15301 Class 1 (Existing Facilities) and/or Section 15303 class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures). Environmental Notice: Council adopt the resolution. Recommended Action: Page 3 City of Chula Vista Printed on 8/9/2018 3 August 14, 2018City Council Agenda A.RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE PARK MASTER PLAN AND THE NAME FOR THE 7.5-ACRE NEIGHBORHOOD PARK P-1 LOCATED IN OTAY RANCH VILLAGE 3 B.RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING AN ADDENDUM TO THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND HOMEFED VILLAGE III MASTER, LLC. FOR CONSTRUCTION OF NEIGHBORHOOD PARK P-1 IN OTAY RANCH VILLAGE 3 AND A PORTION OF COMMUNITY PARK P-2 IN OTAY RANCH VILLAGE 4 AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS THEREFOR (4/5 VOTE REQUIRED) C.RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING A REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND HOMEFED VILLAGE III MASTER, LLC., FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF NEIGHBORHOOD PARK P-1 IN OTAY RANCH VILLAGE 3 18-02576.18-0257 Development Services Department Department: The Director of Development Services has determined the project was adequately covered in the previously adopted Final Environmental Impact Report, EIR-13-01. Therefore, no additional environmental review is required. Environmental Notice: Council adopt the resolutions. Recommended Action: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING A GOLF COURSE FACILITY MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT WITH TOUCHSTONE GOLF, LLC. FOR PROFESSIONAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR THE CHULA VISTA GOLF COURSE 18-02897.18-0289 Economic Development Department Department: The Director of Development Services has determined the project was adequately covered in the previously adopted Final Environmental Impact Report, EIR-13-01. Therefore, no additional environmental review is required. Environmental Notice: Council adopt the resolution. Recommended Action: Page 4 City of Chula Vista Printed on 8/9/2018 4 August 14, 2018City Council Agenda RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA TRANSFERRING $550,000 IN TRANSNET APPROPRIATIONS FROM STM0397 (MAJOR PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FY2018/19) TO STM0392 (CLASS TWO BIKE LANES ON BROADWAY) PROJECT (4/5 VOTE REQUIRED) 18-02948.18-0294 Engineering Department Department: The Project qualifies for a Categorical Exemption pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines Section 15301 Class 1 (Existing Facilities) and/or Section 15304 Class 4 (Minor Alterations to Land). Environmental Notice: Council adopt the resolution. Recommended Action: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING BIDS, AWARDING THE CONTRACT FOR THE COMBINED ADVERTISEMENT OF THE “MAJOR PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FY 2017/2018 (STM393)” AND “BONITA ROAD AND ALLEN SCHOOL LANE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS (STL418)” PROJECTS TO FRANK AND SON PAVING, INC., IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,346,443.66, APPROPRIATING $86,647 FROM THE AVAILABLE BALANCE OF THE SEWER FACILITY REPLACEMENT FUND TO STM393, AND TRANSFERRING $14,638 IN CALRECYCLE GRANT FUND APPROPRIATIONS FROM STM390 TO STM393 (4/5 VOTE REQUIRED) 18-03189.18-0318 Engineering Department Department: The project qualifies for a Class 1 Categorical Exemption pursuant to Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines. Environmental Notice: Council adopt the resolution. Recommended Action: Page 5 City of Chula Vista Printed on 8/9/2018 5 August 14, 2018City Council Agenda RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2018-19 CIP BUDGET TO ESTABLISH A NEW CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, CVEATC BRIDGE REPAIR FY2018-19 (GGV0241), AND APPROPRIATING $250,000 TO THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND BASED ON UNANTICIPATED REVENUE FROM LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY (4/5 VOTE REQUIRED) 18-032310.18-0323 Engineering Department Department: The Project qualifies for a Class 1 Categorical Exemption pursuant to Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines. Environmental Notice: Council adopt the resolution. Recommended Action: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES TO PREPARE A DOWNTOWN PARKING MANAGEMENT STUDY TO CHEN RYAN ASSOCIATES IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $151,449.00 18-033911.18-0339 Development Services Department Department: The activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines because it will not result in a physical change in the environment; therefore, pursuant to Section 15060(c)(3), no environmental review is required. Environmental Notice: Council adopt the resolution. Recommended Action: Page 6 City of Chula Vista Printed on 8/9/2018 6 August 14, 2018City Council Agenda RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA TRANSFERRING $450,000 IN MEASURE P APPROPRIATIONS FROM THE DRN0211, STORM DRAIN (CMP) REHABILITATION OUTSIDE THE RIGHT OF WAY (PHASE II) PROJECT TO DRN0209, STORM DRAIN (CMP) REHABILITATION OUTSIDE THE RIGHT OF WAY (PHASE I) PROJECT FOR CONTRACT CHANGE ORDERS AND ADDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT COSTS (4/5 VOTE REQUIRED) 18-034512.18-0345 Engineering Department Department: The Director of Development Services has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the project qualifies for Class 1 Categorical Exemptions pursuant to Section 15301, Class 1 (b) (Existing Facilities) of the CEQA State Guidelines. Consistent with Section 15301(b), the proposed action would not result in a significant effect on the environment, create a cumulative impact, damage a scenic highway, be located on a site pursuant to Section 65962.5, or cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. The project involves no expansion of an existing use. Thus, no further environmental review is necessary. Environmental Notice: Council adopt the resolution. Recommended Action: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH MADAFFER ENTERPRISES, INC. A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, FOR PHASE II IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SMART CITY STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN 18-036213.18-0362 Economic Development Department Department: The activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required. In addition, notwithstanding the foregoing, the “Project” also qualifies for an Exemption pursuant to Section 15061(b) (3) of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines. Environmental Notice: Council adopt the resolution. Recommended Action: ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR Page 7 City of Chula Vista Printed on 8/9/2018 7 August 14, 2018City Council Agenda PUBLIC COMMENTS Persons speaking during Public Comments may address the Council on any subject matter within the Council’s jurisdiction that is not listed as an item on the agenda. State law generally prohibits the Council from discussing or taking action on any issue not included on the agenda, but, if appropriate, the Council may schedule the topic for future discussion or refer the matter to staff. Comments are limited to three minutes. ACTION ITEMS The Item(s) listed in this section of the agenda will be considered individually by the Council and are expected to elicit discussion and deliberation. If you wish to speak on any item, please fill out a “Request to Speak” form (available in the lobby) and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ADOPTING AN ADDENDUM TO THE CHULA VISTA FIRE FACILITY, EQUIPMENT, AND DEPLOYMENT MASTER PLAN 18-036114.18-0361 Fire Department Department: The Project qualifies for a Statutory Exemption pursuant to Section 15262 (Feasibility and Planning Studies) pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines. Environmental Notice: Council adopt the resolution. Recommended Action: CITY MANAGER’S REPORTS CONSIDERATION OF THE FORMATION OF AN AD-HOC SUBCOMMITTEE FOR THE 2018 STARLIGHT PARADE 18-038515.18-0385 MAYOR’S REPORTS COUNCILMEMBERS’ COMMENTS CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS CLOSED SESSION Announcements of actions taken in Closed Session shall be made available by noon on Wednesday following the Council Meeting at the City Attorney’s office in accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act (Government Code 54957.7). Page 8 City of Chula Vista Printed on 8/9/2018 8 August 14, 2018City Council Agenda CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9 (d)(1) Name of case: Alexandra Investments, Inc ., et al. v. City of Chula Vista, et al., San Diego Superior Court, Case No. 37-2018-00010121-CU-NP-CTL 18-037816.18-0378 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6 Agency designated representatives: Gary Halbert, Glen Googins, Kelley Bacon, David Bilby, Courtney Chase, Ed Prendell and Simon Silva. Employee organization(s): Mid-Managers/Professional Association/Service Employees International Union, Local 221 (MM/PROF/SEIU) 18-038017.18-0380 ADJOURNMENT to the Special City Council Meeting on September 11, 2018, at 4:00 p.m., in the Executive Conference Room; and thence to the Regular City Council Meeting on September 11, 2018, at 5:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers. Materials provided to the City Council related to any open-session item on this agenda are available for public review at the City Clerk’s Office, located in City Hall at 276 Fourth Avenue, Building A, during normal business hours. In compliance with the AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT The City of Chula Vista requests individuals who require special accommodations to access, attend, and/or participate in a City meeting, activity, or service, contact the City Clerk’s Office at (619) 691-5041(California Relay Service is available for the hearing impaired by dialing 711) at least forty-eight hours in advance of the meeting. Most Chula Vista City Council meetings, including public comments, are video recorded and aired live on AT&T U-verse channel 99 (throughout the County), on Cox Cable channel 24 (only in Chula Vista), and online at www.chulavistaca.gov. Recorded meetings are also aired on Wednesdays at 7 p.m. (both channels) and are archived on the City's website. Sign up at www.chulavistaca.gov to receive email notifications when City Council agendas are published online. Page 9 City of Chula Vista Printed on 8/9/2018 9 P a g e | 1 August 14, 2018 File ID: 18-0343 18-0382 TITLE ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 2.57 (DESIGN-BUILD CONTRACTS) TO AMEND THE AUTHORIZED PROCUREMENT AND SELECTION METHODS FOR DESIGN-BUILD PROJECTS RECOMMENDED ACTION Council adopt the ordinance. SUMMARY The proposed amendments to the City’s Design-Build ordinance would add Collaborative Design- Build/Progressive Design-Build (CDB/PDB) and cooperative purchasing as authorized procurement methods for design-build services. CDB/PDB is becoming a preferred project delivery method for owners due to a number of potential advantages including expedited delivery of projects, increased owner control over project design, tailored project scopes to a given budget, and reduced risk of budget overruns. Cooperative purchasing is also is a preferred project delivery method as it can reduce time to solicit and process bids and provide cost savings bystreamlining the procurement process. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Environmental Determination The Director of Development Services has reviewed the proposed activity for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines because it will not result in a physical change in the environment; therefore, pursuant to Section 15060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the activity is not subject to CEQA. In addition, notwithstanding the foregoing, the Director of Development Services has also determined that the “Project” qualifies for an Exemption pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines. Thus, no environmental review is required. BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION Not applicable. DISCUSSION Collaborative Design-Build/Progressive Design-Build 10 P a g e | 2 The purpose of the proposed changes to Municipal Code Section 2.57 (Design-Build Contracts) is to update the code to allow for procurement of design-build services through a Collaborative Design-Build or Progressive Design-Build (CDB/PDB) process. CDB/PDB is a method of design-build procurement where delivery is via a phased or progressive process. CDB/PDB uses a qualifications-based or best value selection, followed by a process whereby the owner then “progresses” towards a design and contract price with the project team. In CDB/PDB, the project is delivered in two contract phases. Phase one includes design development, preconstruction services, and the negotiation of a firm contract price (either lump sum or guaranteed maximum price). Phase two includes final design, construction, and commissioning. During phase one the owner and the design-builder work together to develop the design and tailor the design to the project budget. Once the design is developed to the point where the owner is satisfied with the design and cost, and the design-builder can establish a high level of cost certainty in phase one, the project moves into phase two after the parties negotiate and agree to a lump sum or guaranteed maximum price contract. CDB/PDB is becoming a preferred project delivery method in the building industry because of several advantages including expedited delivery of projects, increased owner control over design in design-build projects, ability to tailor the scope of a project to a given budget as the development progresses, and minimized risk of budget overruns. Project delivery can be expedited by eliminating the need for a preliminary design phase where performance specifications and/or preliminary drawings have to be incorporated into the Request for Proposal. Due to the collaborative approach, the design of the project and costing is developed at the same time which allows for adjustments during the design to tailor the scope of a project to a given budget. The design-builder is the single point of responsibility for the design and construction, thus the owner is not liable for design errors, which significantly reduces the risk of cost overruns. This proposed amendment would add an option to procure design build services using a project-specific request for proposal setting forth the basic scope of the project and the project budget. The amendment would also allow for a two phase contracting strategy, as outlined above, that would include a design and pre-construction phase, and a final design and construction phase. This proposed amendment would allow for the selection of CDP/PDB Design-Build Services based on the best value provided by the proposal rather than low bid. Best value selection is typically used in the CDB/PDB delivery method. In a best value selection method, the design builder is evaluated based on factors including demonstrated competence, experience, and cost to determine which proposal provides the best value in meeting the interests of the owner and meeting the objectives of the project. Best value selection is appropriate for the CDB/PDB delivery method because at the time of design-builder selection, the design has not yet been developed to the point where an accurate cost can be determined so the primary factor for selection is the qualifications of the design-builder. Cooperative PurchasingDesign-Build Chula Vista Municipal Code section 2.56.140 authorizes the City to procure supplies, equipment, and services under its purchasing system through a cooperative purchasing program provided that such items 11 P a g e | 3 are purchased through a competitive process that the Purchasing Agent determines to be consistent with good purchasing practices. This proposed amendment would add cooperative purchasing as an authorized method for procuring design-build services. The cooperative purchasing process typically utilizes national or state-wide competitive solicitations that meet or exceed local requirements for a variety of products and services awarded to vendor contracts in a wide variety of industries. The competitively bid contracts provide best price by allowing for purchase directly from manufacturers to lower overall project costs. It further allows flexibility to staff in procuring design-build services to suit specific project needs. Cooperative purchasing reduces procurement time and eliminates the time and expense of completing the normal procurement cycle for each project. This streamlined process can result in an estimated 4-6 month savings in time by eliminating the need to solicit and process bids/proposals. This process speeds up the time that a contractor can begin work by minimizing engineering, design, and contract procurement time. There is also potential cost savings from streamlining the procurement process. This proposed amendment would allow selection of design-build services through a cooperative purchasing arrangement based on the best value provided by the proposal rather than low bid. DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT Staff has reviewed the decision contemplated by this action and has determined that it is not site-specific and consequently, the 500-foot rule found in California Code of Regulations Title 2, section 18702.2(a)(11), is not applicable to this decision for purposes of determining a disqualifying real property-related financial conflict of interest under the Political Reform Act (Cal. Gov't Code § 87100, et seq.). Staff is not independently aware, and has not been informed by any member, of any other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter. LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS The City’s Strategic Plan has five major goals: Operational Excellence, Economic Vitality, Healthy Community, Strong and Secure Neighborhoods and a Connected Community. Amending the City’s design- build code supports the City’s Strategic Plan of Operational Excellence by expediting delivery of projects, increasing owner control over design in design-build projects, enabling an owner to tailor the scope of a project to a given budget, and minimize the risk of budget overruns. CURRENT-YEAR FISCAL IMPACT There are no projected fiscal impacts related to this item. ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT There are no projected fiscal impacts related to this item. ATTACHMENTS Draft Ordinance Staff Contact: Jonathan Salsman, Senior Civil Engineer 12 ORDINANCE NO. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 2.57 (DESIGN-BUILD CONTRACTS) TO AMEND THE AUTHORIZED PROCUREMENT AND SELECTION METHODS FOR DESIGN-BUILD PROJECTS WHEREAS, on October 24, 2000, the City adopted Ordinance 2827, codified at Section 2.57 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, establishing specific procedures to solicit, qualify, evaluate, select, and award design-build contracts. WHEREAS, the proposed amendments would add a Collaborative Design Build/Progressive Design-Build project delivery method that is intended to, among other things, expedite delivery of projects, increase owner control over design, enable an owner to tailor the scope of a project to a given budget, and minimize the risk of budget overruns; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendments add a cooperative purchasing process for design-build projects to enhance the efficiency and flexibility of the City’s design-build procurement practices and procedures; and WHEREAS, it is desirable to amend the City’s design-build ordinance to allow for additional design-build project delivery methods to improve the efficiency and flexibility of the design and construction of public works in the City of Chula Vista while providing appropriate safe guards to protect the public interest. NOW THEREFORE the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does ordain as follows: Section I. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION 13 A. Chapter 2, Section 2.57 (Design-Build Contracts) is amended to read as follows: 2.57.010 Purpose and intent. The purpose of this chapter is to establish specific procedures to be used to solicit, qualify, evaluate, select and award design-build contracts. 2.57.020 Definitions. For purposes of this chapter, the following definitions apply: “Best interest of the City” means a design-build process that is projected to meet the interests of the City and objectives of the project which may include reducing the project delivery schedule and total cost of the project while maintaining a high level of quality workmanship and materials. “Best value” means value determined by objective criteria, and may include, but is not limited to, price, features, functions, life cycle costs, and other criteria deemed appropriate. “Design-build” means a public works contract procurement method in which both the design and construction of a project are procured from a single entity. “Design-build entity” means a partnership, corporation, or other legal entity that is able to provide appropriately licensed contracting, architectural, and engineering services as needed. “Design-build entity member” includes any person or entity that provides licensed contracting, architectural, or engineering services. “Design professional” means a professional, either City staff or an outside consultant, who develops the criteria package which may include, but is not limited to, facility program, design criteria, performance specifications and other project- specific technical material. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION 14 “Qualified list of design-build entities” means those design-build entities selected based on a competitive selection process and who are determined to be qualified to act as a design-build entity for the City of Chula Vista on any project. “Sole source” means a commodity or service available from only one known source as the result of unique performance capabilities, manufacturing processes, compatibility requirements or market conditions. 2.57.030 Design-build procurement. Prior to procuring a design-build public works contract, the City shall complete one of the following processes: A. Project-Specific RFP/RFQ. Prepare a project-specific request for proposal or qualification setting forth the basic scope of the project that may include, but is not limited to the size, type, and desired design character of the project and site, and performance specifications. The performance specifications shall describe the quality of construction materials, assemblies, and other information deemed necessary to adequately describe the City’s needs. The performance specifications shall be prepared by a design professional designated by the City; or B. Project-Specific RFP to a Qualified List of Proposers. Prepare a project- specific request for proposal setting forth the basic scope of the project that may include, but is not limited to the size, type and desired design character of the project and site, and performance specifications to be distributed exclusively to those teams selected from the qualified list of design-build entities. The performance specifications shall describe the quality of construction materials, assemblies, and other information deemed necessary to adequately describe the City’s needs. The performance specifications shall be prepared by a design professional designated by the City; or C. Project-Specific RFP (Collaborative Design-Build/Progressive Design-Build) to a Qualified List of Proposers. Prepare a project-specific request for proposal SECOND READING AND ADOPTION 15 setting forth the basic scope of the project and the project budget to be distributed exclusively to teams selected from a qualified list of design-build entities. The request for proposals shall indicate that the project is to be completed in two contract phases: (i) a design and pre-construction phase and (ii) a final design and construction phase. The request for proposals shall require proposers to submit a technical proposal describing the proposer’s experience, project personnel, organizational structure, project approach, and project schedule and plan. The request for proposal shall require proposers to submit a fee proposal for both phases of the project. DC. Selection from Qualified List of Proposers. Select a design-build entity from those teams identified on the qualified list of design-build entities without preparing a formal request for proposals. Prior to an award to a design-build entity pursuant to the qualified list of design-build entities, the City Manager shall certify to the City Council in writing that the most qualified firms have been invited to interview and the selected firm is capable of providing the services and it is in the best interest of the City to proceed in this manner; or ED. Sole Source. Select a design-build entity or team as a sole source, if, in advance of the award of the contract, the City Manager certifies in writing that the proposed provider and services meet the requirements for award as a sole source (as defined in Section 2.57.020) status of the provider; or F. Cooperative Purchasing. Select a design-build entity or team through a competitive cooperative purchasing solicitation in accordance with 2.56.140 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code (Cooperative Purchasing) and other City rules, regulations, and procedures governing design-build procurement. The City is authorized to cancel any design-build procurement process at any time if the City determines doing so would be in the best interest of the City. The City is not responsible or liable for any costs incurred by a proposer pursuant to any design-build procurement process. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION 16 2.57.040 Qualification and selection process. The City may establish a qualification and selection process for design-build entities that specifies the qualification criteria, as well as recommends the manner in which the winning entity will be selected. Nothing in this chapter precludes a design-build contract from being awarded to a sole source if, in advance of the contract, the City Manager certifies in writing the sole source status of the provider. 2.57.050 Qualification criteria. Prior to the award of a design-build contract, the design-build entity may be required to provide any or all of the following qualification criteria: A. Possession of all required licenses, registrations, and credentials in good standing that are required to design and construct the project. B. Submission of documentation establishing that the design-build entity members have completed, or demonstrated the capability to complete, projects of similar size, scope, building type, or complexity, and that proposed key personnel have sufficient experience and training to competently manage and complete the design and construction of the project. C. Submission of a proposed project management plan establishing that the design- build entity has the experience, competence and capacity needed to effectively complete the project. D. Submission of evidence establishing the design-build entity has the capacity to obtain all required payment and performance bonding, liability insurance, and errors and omissions insurance, as well as a financial statement demonstrating to the City’s satisfaction that the design-build entity has the capacity to complete the project. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION 17 E. Provision of a declaration that the applying members of the design-build entity have not had a surety company finish work on any project within the past five years. F. Provision of a declaration providing detail for the past five years concerning all of the following: 1. Civil or criminal violations of the Occupational Safety and Health Act against any member of the design-build entity; 2. Civil or criminal violations of the Contractors’ State License Law against any member of the design-build entity; 3. Any conviction of any member of the design-build entity of submitting a false or fraudulent claim to a public agency; 4. Civil or criminal violations of federal or state law governing the payment of wages, benefits, or personal income tax withholding, or of Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA) withholding requirements, state disability insurance withholding, or unemployment insurance payment requirements against any member of the design-build entity. For purposes of this section, only violations by a design-build entity member as an employer shall be deemed applicable, unless it is shown that the design-build entity member, in his or her capacity as an employer, had knowledge of a subcontractor’s or employee’s violations or failed to comply with the conditions set forth in Section 1775(b) of the State Labor Code; 5. Civil or criminal violations of federal or state law against any design-build entity member governing equal opportunity employment, contracting or subcontracting; 6. Any construction or design claim or litigation totaling more than $50,000 pending or settled against any member of the design-build entity over the last five years; 7. Any debarment, disqualification or removal from a federal, state, or local government public works project. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION 18 G. Provision of a declaration that the design-build entity will comply with all other provisions of law applicable to the project. The declaration shall state that reasonable diligence has been used in its preparation and that it is true and complete to the best of the signer’s knowledge. H. In the case of a partnership or other association that is not a legal entity, a copy of the agreement creating the partnership or association and specifying that all partners or association members agree to be fully liable for the performance under the design-build contract. 2.57.060 Selection method. The City shall select one of the following methods as the process to be used for the selection, if any, of the winning entity: A. A design-build competition based on performance specifications and criteria set forth by the City in the request for proposals. 1. Criteria used in this form of evaluation of proposals may include, but not be limited to, items such as proposed design approach, life-cycle costs, project features, financing, quality, total cost, past performance, business standing, schedule, and operational and functional performance of the facility. However, any criteria and methods used to evaluate proposals shall be limited to those contained in the request for design-build proposals or qualifications. 2. Any architectural firms, engineering firms, specialty consultants, or individuals retained by the City to assist in the preparation of the request for proposals shall not be eligible to participate in the competition with any design-build entity. 3. The City shall make an aAward, if any, shall be made to the design-build entity whose proposal is judged as providing best value meeting the interests of the City and meeting the objectives of the project. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION 19 B. A design-build competition based on program requirements, performance specifications, and a preliminary design or combination thereof set forth by the City in the request for proposals. Limited or preliminary drawings and specifications detailing the requirements of the project may accompany the request for proposals. 1. The City shall establish technical criteria and methodology, including price, to evaluate proposals and shall describe the criteria and methodology of evaluation and selection in the request for proposal or qualification design-build entity. 2. Any architectural firms, engineering firms, specialty consultants, or individuals retained by the City to assist in the preparation of request for proposals shall not be eligible to participate in the competition with any design-build entity. 3. The City shall make an aAward, if any, shall be made to the design-build entity on the basis of the technical criteria and methodology, including price, whose proposal is judged as providing best value in meeting the interests of the City and meeting the objectives of the project. C. A design-build competition based on a Collaborative Design-Build or Progressive Design-Build solicitation as set forth by the City in a request for proposals. 1.The City shall establish criteria and methodology, including demonstrated competence, experience, and cost, to evaluate proposals and select a design-build entity. The City shall include the established criteria and methodology in the request for proposals. 2.Any architectural firm, engineering firm, consultant, or individual retained by City to assist in the preparation of a request for proposals will not be eligible to participate in the competition with any design-build entity or team. 3. The City shall make an award, if any, based on a determination of which proposal provides the best value to meet the interests of the City and objectives of the project. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION 20 4.If the City makes an award to a design-build entity for the design and pre- construction phase, the City is not obligated to make an award to the same design- build entity for the final design and construction phase. The City is authorized to utilize any information obtained or documentation prepared during the design and pre-construction phase in any manner desired by the City, including use in separate and subsequent design-build or public works solicitation processes. DC. A design-build competition based on program requirements and a detailed scope of work, including any preliminary design drawings and specifications set forth by the City in the request for proposals. 1. Any architectural firms, engineering firms, specialty consultants, or individuals retained by the City to assist in the preparation of request for proposals shall not be eligible to participate in the competition with any design-build entity. 2. The City shall make an aAward, if any, shall be made on the basis of the lowest responsive bid. ED. The City shall make aA “sole source” award, if any, as otherwise allowed by law and in strict accordance with the City’s rules, regulations, and procedures governing sole source awards. F. A design-build competition based on a cooperative purchasing solicitation. 1.The Purchasing Agent shall review the criteria and methodology used to evaluate proposals and select the winning entity pursuant to the cooperative purchasing solicitation. The Purchasing Agent shall make a written determination whether such criteria and methodology substantially conforms to the City’s rules, regulations, and procedures governing design-build procurement. 2. If the Purchasing Agent determines that the criteria and methodology used to evaluate proposals and select the winning entity substantially conforms to City’s rules, regulations, and procedures governing design-build procurement, the City SECOND READING AND ADOPTION 21 shall make an award, if any, to the winning entity which has been awarded a contract pursuant to the cooperative purchasing solicitation. The City has no obligation to select a winning entity or award a contract pursuant to any design-build procurement process. The City is authorized to reject any and all proposals at any time if the City determines doing so would be the best interest of the City. The City is not responsible or liable for any costs incurred by any proposer in the preparation or submission of a proposal, or any other costs incurred by any proposer during the selection process. 2.57.070 Work listing. A. The City recognizes that the design-build entity is charged with performing both design and construction. Because a design-build contract may be awarded prior to the completion of the design, it is often impractical for the design-build entity to list all subcontractors at the time of the award. B. All of the following requirements shall apply to subcontractors, licensed by the State, that are employed on design-build projects undertaken pursuant to this chapter. 1. The design-build entity in each design-build proposal shall specify the construction trades or types of subcontractors that may be named as members of the design-build entity at the time of award. In selecting the trades that may be identified as members of the design-build entity, the design-build entity shall identify the trades deemed essential in the design considerations of the project. All subcontractors that are listed at the time of award shall be afforded the protection of all applicable laws. 2. All subcontracts that were not listed by the design-build entity at the time of award in accordance with subsection (B)(1) of this section shall be performed and awarded by the design-build entity in accordance with a bidding process set forth in the design-build agreement. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION 22 3. In a contract between the design-build entity and a subcontractor, and in a contract and any subcontractor thereunder, the percentage of the retention proceeds withheld may not exceed the percentage specified in the contract between the City and the design-build entity. If the design-build entity provides written notice to any subcontractor who is not a member of the design-build entity, prior to or at the time that the bid is requested, that a bond may be required and the subcontractor subsequently is unable or refuses to furnish a bond to the design- build entity, then the design-build entity may withhold retention proceeds in excess of the percentage specified in the contract between the City and the design- build entity from any payment made by the design-build entity to the subcontractor. Section II. Severability If any portion of this Ordinance, or its application to any person or circumstance, is for any reason held to be invalid, unenforceable or unconstitutional, by a court of competent jurisdiction, that portion shall be deemed severable, and such invalidity, unenforceability or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining portions of the Ordinance, or its application to any other person or circumstance. The City Council of the City of Chula Vista hereby declares that it would have adopted each section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance, irrespective of the fact that any one or more other sections, sentences, clauses or phrases of the Ordinance be declared invalid, unenforceable or unconstitutional. Section III. Construction The City Council of the City of Chula Vista intends this Ordinance to supplement, not to duplicate or contradict, applicable state and federal law and this Ordinance shall be construed in light of that intent. Section IV. Effective Date This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force on the thirtieth day after its final passage. Section V. Publication SECOND READING AND ADOPTION 23 The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published or posted according to law. Presented by Approved as to form by William S. Valle Glen R. Googins Director of Engineering and City Attorney Capital Projects SECOND READING AND ADOPTION 24 P a g e | 1 August 14, 2018 File ID: 18-0303 18-0383 TITLE A. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING THE COMPENSATION SCHEDULE AND CLASSIFICATION PLAN TO REFLECT (1) THE ADDITION AND DELETION OF VARIOUS POSITION TITLES AND (2) THE SALARY ADJUSTMENTS FOR POLICY AIDE AND DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS AND AMENDING THE AUTHORIZED POSITION COUNT WITH NO NET CHANGE IN AUTHORIZED STAFFING B. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING THE COMPENSATION SUMMARY FOR UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEES C. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE REVISED FISCAL YEAR 2018-2019 COMPENSATION SCHEDULE EFFECTIVE AUGUST 17, 2018, AS REQUIRED BY CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, TITLE 2, SECTION 570.5 D. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 2.05.010 TO DELETE THE UNCLASSIFIED POSITION OF CONSTITUENT SERVICES REPRESENTATIVE (FIRST READING) (4/5 VOTE REQUIRED) RECOMMENDED ACTION Council adopt the resolution and place the ordinance on first reading. SUMMARY In an effort to address the needs of various departments and the City's workforce, the Human Resources Department, in conjunction with the affected departments, is proposing the reclassification of certain positions, the addition and deletion of certain classifications, a title change for the Environmental Health Specialist classification and a salary adjustment for the Policy Aide and Director of Public Works classifications. Additionally, staff is recommending the amendment of the Compensation Summary for Unrepresented Employees to reflect the addition of the Post Employment Health Plan for Executive and Senior Managers approved by the City Council at their June 19, 2018 meeting. 25 P a g e | 2 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Environmental Notice The activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required. Environmental Determination The Director of Development Services has reviewed the proposed activity for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to Section 15060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Thus, no environmental review is required. BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION The Civil Service Commission adopted the amendment to the classification plan, subject to the approval of the City Council, at their August 2, 2018 meeting. DISCUSSION 1.Classification Plan Changes Civil Service Rule 1.02(A), which applies to the City’s classified positions, provides for necessary reviews and changes so that the City’s classification plan is kept current, and that changes in existing classes, the establishment of new classes, or the abolition of classes are properly reflected in the classification plan. In an effort to address the needs of various departments and the City's workforce, the Human Resources Department is proposing various new classifications and the reclassification of certain positions. The following identifies the departments, affected positions and proposed changes. Department Position Title FTE Community Services Library Digital Services Manager -1.00 Principal Librarian 1.00 Economic Development Senior Conservation Specialist -1.00 Environmental Sustainability Manager 1.00 Engineering Environmental Health Specialist -2.00 Storm Environmental Specialist II 2.00 Mayor and Council Constituent Services Representative -1.00 Senior Council Assistant 1.00 Police Senior Office Specialist -1.00 Senior Police Records Specialist 1.00 26 P a g e | 3 Department Position Title FTE Public Works Management Analyst -1.00 Senior Management Analyst 1.00 Total City-Wide Position Changes (Net Increase/Decrease)0.00 Summary of New and Updated Classifications Position Title Bargaining Group Bi-Weekly E Step Policy Aide Professional, Unclassified $2,716.39 Director of Public Works Executive Management $7,222.27 Storm Water Environmental Specialist I ACE $3,036.15 Storm Water Environmental Specialist II ACE $3,339.76 2.Amendment to the Compensation Summary for Unrepresented Employees In response to requests from staff to address the cost of health care post retirement, the Human Resources Department proposed to enter into a Post Employment Health Plan (“PEHP”) with Nationwide for Executive and Senior Managers at no cost to the City. The PEHP, which was approved by the City Council at their meeting of June 19, 2018, will be funded with mandatory eligible employee contributions, specifically any unused vacation balances due to the employee at the time of retirement, and rolled over into the PEHP. Staff is proposing an amendment of the Compensation Summary for Unrepresented Employees to include the PEHP for Executive and Senior Managers. 3.Compensation Schedule Requirement California Code of Regulations, Title 2, Section 570.5 requires that, for purposes of determining a retiring employee's pension allowance, the pay rate be limited to the amount listed on a pay schedule that meets certain requirements and be approved by the governing body in accordance with the requirements of the applicable public meeting laws. The revised Fiscal Year 2018-2019 Compensation Schedule ("Compensation Schedule") was last approved by the City Council at their meeting of June 12, 2018. This item ensures continued compliance with California Code of Regulations, Title 2, Section 570.5, by ensuring the City has an up-to-date publicly approved Compensation Schedule. 4.Unclassified Ordinance Chula Vista Municipal Code Section 2.05.010 is updated on an ongoing basis to reflect the position changes impacting the unclassified positions. Chula Vista City Charter Section 500 requires that all unclassified positions not mentioned specifically in Charter Section 500 be adopted by ordinance. 27 P a g e | 4 5.Resolutions and Ordinance Approval of Resolution A will approve the new and updated classifications and salary adjustments discussed above, in “Classification Plan Changes”. Approval of Resolution B will approve the amendment to the Compensation Summary for Unrepresented Employees to include the Post Employment Health Plan for Executive and Senior Managers. Approval of Resolution C will approve the revised Compensation Schedule effective August 17, 2018, to reflect the addition and deletion of various position titles, and the salary adjustments for Policy Aide and Director of Public Works. Adoption of the ordinance will delete the position title of Constituent Services Representative. DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT Staff has determined that the action contemplated by this item is ministerial, secretarial, manual, or clerical in nature and, as such, does not require the City Council members to make or participate in making a governmental decision, pursuant to California Code of Regulations Title 2, section 18702.4(a). Consequently, this item does not present a conflict under the Political Reform Act (Cal. Gov't Code § 87100, et seq.). Staff is not independently aware, and has not been informed by any City Council member, of any other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter. LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS The City’s Strategic Plan has five major goals: Operational Excellence, Economic Vitality, Healthy Community, Strong and Secure Neighborhoods and a Connected Community. The position changes support the City-wide strategic goal of Operational Excellence by providing more accurate position titles that better reflect the needs of the City’s workforce and salaries that attract and retain quality employees. Furthermore, approval of the revised Fiscal Year 2018-2019 Compensation Schedule and its posting on the City's internet website supports the goal of Operational Excellence as it enhances disclosure and transparency of employee compensation and, as a result, fosters public trust through an open and ethical government. CURRENT-YEAR FISCAL IMPACT The position and salary adjustments within the Mayor and Council Department are estimated to total a net cost of $9,332. There is anticipated savings projected within the Office of the Mayor’s Supplies and Services budget in the department to absorb the additional cost, resulting in no net impact to the General Fund. The budget transfer will be considered as part of the Finance Department’s First Quarter Update. The position change within the Economic Development Department is estimated to be $28,797. This cost will be offset with grant funds. The budget transfer will be considered as part of the Finance Department’s First Quarter Update. The remaining proposed position/classification changes in the Community Services, Engineering, Police and Public Works Departments do not have a net impact on the General Fund in the current fiscal year. 28 P a g e | 5 ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT The ongoing costs associated with these proposed changes are estimated at approximately $40,000 annually. The overall cost will increase along with future cost of living adjustments and benefit changes. The costs will be incorporated into the baseline salary budgets of the respective departments in future fiscal years. ATTACHMENTS 1.Amended Compensation Summary for Unrepresented Employees 2.Revised Fiscal Year 2018-2019 Compensation Schedule August 17, 2018 Staff Contact: Courtney Chase 29 Page 1 of 37 COMPENSATION SUMMARY FOR EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT,SENIOR MANAGEMENT,UNCLASSIFIED MIDDLE MANAGEMENT/PROFESSIONAL, CONFIDENTIAL MIDDLE MANAGEMENT/PROFESSIONAL, UNCLASSIFIED CONFIDENTIAL, CONFIDENTIAL CLASSIFIED, MAYOR, COUNCIL, CITY ATTORNEY AND UNCLASSIFIED HOURLY EMPLOYEES FISCAL YEARS 2017-2018, 2018-2019 and 2019-2020 I.EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT GROUP (ALL EMPLOYEES PROVIDED FOR IN THIS GROUP ARE FLSA-EXEMPT) A. SALARY & WAGES 1. Salary Increases a. For Fiscal Year 2017-2018 all Executive positions shall receive a 2% salary adjustment the first full pay period of July 2017. b. For Fiscal Year 2018-2019 all Executive positions shall receive a 2% salary adjustment the first full pay period of July 2018. c. For Fiscal Year 2019-2020 all Executive positions shall receive a 2% salary adjustment the first full pay period of July 2019. B. BENEFITS 1. Deferred Compensation Plan 457 plan - Employees in the Executive Group may participate in the City's approved deferred compensation plans. 2. Cafeteria Plan a. In calendar year 2017, Executive Managers will receive $16,536 annually to be used for the purchase of approved employee benefits through the City’s cafeteria plan or to be placed in a taxable cash option. a) For calendar year 2017 the maximum taxable option shall be $15,162 b) For calendar year 2018 the maximum taxable option shall be $12,000 c) For calendar year 2019 the maximum taxable option shall be $10,000 d) For calendar year 2020 the maximum taxable option shall be $8,000 b. In the event of increases in health care plan premiums, the City will split the cost of the increase 50/50 with the employees. The annual cafeteria plan benefit allotment will be increased by one-half of the average cost increase for full family non-indemnity health plan premiums. The City's share of the increased cost will be added to the beginning cafeteria plan balance of the next available cafeteria plan year. 30 Page 2 of 37 c. From the annual Cafeteria Plan allotment, each employee must elect medical coverage under one of the City sponsored plans, unless the employee has group medical insurance from another source including coverage under their City employee spouse’s plan in which case they may waive coverage so long as the alternative plan is deemed to be an acceptable plan by the City. When waiving coverage the full value of the Cafeteria Plan allotment will be available to purchase any of the other options available under the Cafeteria Plan. Waiver of coverage is irrevocable during a plan year unless the City is notified within 30 days that the employee has involuntarily lost the alternative coverage. d. The Flex Benefit Amount for Employee Only, those with coverage outside of the City, and those employees covered by another City Employee is fixed at the amount provided in the calendar year 2013 ($15,162). The flex amount for Employee+1 and Employee+Family will be adjusted under the current 50/50 cost sharing formula. 3. Short/Long Term Disability Insurance The City will pay the full cost of the short/long-term disability insurance premium for Executive Managers. 4. Retiree Healthcare The City will no longer provide for subsidized retiree health care rates by offering a blended healthcare rate for employees hired after January 1, 2011. 5. Post Employment Health Plan Employees in the Executive Group may participate in a Post Employment Health Plan (PEHP), funded with mandatory eligible employee contributions, specifically any unused vacation balances due to the employee at the time of retirement will be rolled over into the PEHP. Those employees not wishing to participate may sell back up to 100% of vacation (annual) balances the last full pay period of employment prior to retirement. 6. Life Insurance City pays for a Group Term Life and AD&D insurance policy with coverage in the amount of $50,000 per employee. 7. Retirement The City will provide to unrepresented members retirement benefits via contract with the California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) as set forth in the California Government Code. The City will provide the following defined benefit formulas: Tier 1 Local Miscellaneous 3% @ 60 Local Safety 3% @ 50 Tier 2*Local Miscellaneous 2% @ 60 Local Safety 3% @ 55 31 Page 3 of 37 Tier 3**Local Miscellaneous 2% @ 62 Local Safety 2.7% @ 57 * Effective 04/22/2011 ** Effective 01/01/2013 Tier 1: Local Miscellaneous 3% @ 60 and Local Safety 3% @ 50 Pension Contributions: PEPRA provides that equal sharing of normal costs shall be the standard. To reach that standard, Tier 1 Employees will continue to make the required employee contribution (with no EPMC) of 8% for Local Miscellaneous and 9% for local Safety, but will also contribute the below amounts (in a phased in manner) to the employer’s side (pursuant to Government Code (GC) section 20516) to reach the CalPERS standard of equal sharing of normal costs. Accordingly, Tier 1 Employees shall make the following pension contributions. Local Miscellaneous unrepresented employees in Tier 1 shall contribute 8%, which will be applied to the employee’s contribution to CalPERS. There shall be no EPMC. In addition, Local Miscellaneous unrepresented employees in Tier 1 shall also contribute the amounts stated below on the employer’s side (GC 20516) until equal sharing of normal costs is reached: Up to 1% in the first full pay period of July 2017 on the employer’s (for a total contribution of 9% (8% employee side and 1% employer side)), not to exceed 50% of normal cost as determined by City’s Actuary Up to an additional 1% on the employer’s side in the first full pay period of July 2018 (for a total of 10% (8% employee side and up to 2% employer side)), not to exceed 50% of normal cost as determined by City’s Actuary First full pay period of July 2019, 50% of normal cost as determined by City’s Actuary (including 8% on employee side plus additional amount paid to employer’s side) Local Safety unrepresented employees in Tier 1 shall contribute 9%, which will be applied to the employee’s contribution to CalPERS. There shall be no EPMC. In addition, Local Safety unrepresented employees in Tier 1 shall also contribute the amounts stated below on the employer’s side (GC 20516) until equal sharing of normal costs is reached: Up to 1% in the first full pay period of July 2017 on the employer’s (for a total contribution of 10% (9% employee side and 1% employer side)), not to exceed 50% of normal cost as determined by City’s Actuary Up to an additional 1% on the employer’s side in the first full pay period of July 2018 (for a total of 11% (9% employee side and up to 2% employer side)), not to exceed 50% of normal cost as determined by City’s Actuary Up to an additional 1% on the employer’s side in the first full pay period of July 2018 (for a total of 12% (% employee side and up to 3% employer side)), not to exceed 50% of normal cost as determined by City’s Actuary 32 Page 4 of 37 The following is a summary of Tier 1 CalPERS contract provisions: A. One-Year Final Compensation B. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance C. Credit for Unused Sick Leave D. 4th Level 1959 Survivor Benefit. E. Military Service Credit as Prior Service F. Cost of Living Allowance (2%) G. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance Continuance H. Pre-Retirement Death Benefit for Spouse I. Retired Death Benefit $5,000 J. Prior Service Credit The contributions on the employer’s side (GC 20516) described above are “up to” amounts per fiscal year meaning the employee may be required to contribute up the full amount listed, but the amounts may be less. For example, in FY 2017- 18, the amount for Tier 1 is expected to be the full 1% of GC 20516 contribution, but for Tier 2 (miscellaneous) the amount is expected to be a 0.2% GC 20516 contribution. In addition, the contribution amounts will be based on the City Actuary’s review of most recent CalPERS Annual Valuation Report. For FY 17/18 the most recent Annual Valuation Report was as of June 30, 2015. Tier 2: Local Miscellaneous 2% @ 60 and Local Safety 3% @ 55 Pension Contributions: PEPRA provides that equal sharing of normal costs shall be the standard. To meet that standard, Employees will continue to make the required employee contribution (with no EPMC) of 7% for Local Miscellaneous and 9% for local Safety, but will also contribute (in a phased in manner) to the employer’s side (Government Code (GC) section 20516) to reach the CalPERS standard of equal sharing of normal costs. Accordingly, Tier 2 employees shall make the following pension contributions. Local Miscellaneous unrepresented employees in Tier 2 shall contribute 7%, which will be applied to the employee contribution to CalPERS. There shall be no EPMC. In addition, Local Miscellaneous unrepresented employees in Tier 2 shall also contribute the amounts stated below on the employer’s side (GC 20516) until equal sharing of normal costs is reached: Up to 1% in the first full pay period of July 2017 on the employer’s (for a total contribution of 8% (7% employee side and 1% employer side)), not to exceed 50% of normal cost as determined by City’s Actuary Up to an additional 1% on the employer’s side in the first full pay period of July 2018 (for a total of 9% (7% employee side and up to 2% employer side)), not to exceed 50% of normal cost as determined by City’s Actuary First full pay period of July 2019, 50% of normal cost as determined by City’s Actuary (including 7% on employee side plus additional amount paid to employer’s side) 33 Page 5 of 37 Local Safety unrepresented employees in Tier 2 shall contribute 9%, which will be applied to the employee’s contribution to CalPERS. There shall be no EPMC. In addition, Local Safety unrepresented employees in Tier 2 shall also contribute the amounts stated below on the employer’s side (GC 20516) until equal sharing of normal costs is reached: Up to 1% in the first full pay period of July 2017 on the employer’s (for a total contribution of 10% (9% employee side and 1% employer side)), not to exceed 50% of normal cost as determined by City’s Actuary Up to an additional 1% on the employer’s side in the first full pay period of July 2018 (for a total of 11% (9% employee side and up to 2% employer side)), not to exceed 50% of normal cost as determined by City’s Actuary Up to an additional 1% on the employer’s side in the first full pay period of July 2018 (for a total of 12% (9% employee side and up to 3% employer side)), not to exceed 50% of normal cost as determined by City’s Actuary The following is a summary of Tier 2 CalPERS contract provisions: A. Three-Year Final Compensation B. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance C. Credit for Unused Sick Leave D. 4th Level 1959 Survivor Benefit. E. Military Service Credit as Prior Service F. Cost of Living Allowance (2%) G. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance Continuance H. Pre-Retirement Death Benefit for Spouse I. Retired Death Benefit $5,000 J. Prior Service Credit The contributions on the employer’s side (GC 20516) described above are “up to” amounts per fiscal year meaning the employee may be required to contribute up the full amount listed, but the amounts may be less. For example, in FY 2017- 18, the amount for Tier 1 is expected to be the full 1% of GC 20516 contribution, but for Tier 2 (local miscellaneous) the amount is expected to be a 0.2% GC 20516 contribution. In addition, the contribution amounts will be based on the City Actuary’s review of most recent CalPERS Annual Valuation Report. For FY 17/18 the most recent Annual Valuation Report was as of June 30, 2015. Tier 3: Local Miscellaneous 2% @ 62 and Local Safety 2.7% @ 57 Local Miscellaneous and Local Safety unrepresented employees in Tier 3 shall be responsible for the full employee contribution which will be applied to the CalPERS employee contribution. There shall be no EPMC. PEPRA provides that equal sharing of the normal costs shall be the standard. To meet this standard, Tier 3 employees shall also make additional contributions on the employer’s side (GC 20516) (in up to 1% percent increments per fiscal year, as determined by the City’s actuary) to attain the equal cost sharing of normal costs standard. As of the approval of this Compensation Summary by City Council, no such contributions are expected the 2017-2018 Fiscal Year. 34 Page 6 of 37 To the extent permitted by Assembly Bill 340, known as the California Public Employees’ Pension Reform Act of 2013, the following is a summary of Tier 3 benefits: A. Three-Year Final Compensation B. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance C. Credit for Unused Sick Leave D. 4th Level 1959 Survivor Benefit. The monthly member cost for this benefit will be paid by the City. E. Military Service Credit as Prior Service F. Cost of Living Allowance (2%) G. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance Continuance H. Pre-Retirement Death Benefit for Spouse I. Retired Death Benefit $5,000 J. Prior Service Credit 8. Termination of Sick Leave Balances Upon either acceptance of an application by a Safety employee for disability retirement, or upon the independent determination of CalPERS that a non-safety employee is disabled, the employee shall not be entitled to use any remaining sick leave to cover absences beyond their FMLA entitlement. Sick leave balances may be applied to applicable CalPERS service credit. An application for industrial disability retirement, either employee or employer initiated, shall not affect the employee's rights’ under Workers Compensation laws, such as any otherwise existing right to Temporary Disability benefits for safety officers. 9. Sick Leave Sick leave shall accrue and be reimbursed as designated in the Civil Service Rules. 10.Annual Leave a. Executive Managers shall earn five weeks (25 days) annual leave per fiscal year accrued at 7.69 hours per pay period. An employee may not accumulate more than three times the number of annual leave days accrued annually. b. Executive Managers will have the option of selling back three (3) weeks accrued annual leave each fiscal year. Additional sell back may be allowed at the discretion of the City Manager. 11.Holidays a. Executive Managers will be credited 24 hours each fiscal year for floating holidays (Lincoln's and Washington's Birthdays, and Admission Day). b. The City will be closed on the following hard holidays: Independence Day, Labor Day, Veterans Day, Thanksgiving, the day after Thanksgiving, Christmas, New Year's Day, Martin Luther King Jr.'s Birthday, Cesar Chavez Day, Memorial Day. 35 Page 7 of 37 12.Administrative Leave Executive Managers will receive ninety-six (96) hours of Administrative Leave each fiscal year. 13.Mileage Reimbursement Employees in this unit shall be subject to a mileage reimbursement program when required to use their private automobile for authorized City business. Reimbursement rate will be tied to the IRS rate, in effect at the time reimbursement is requested, as permitted by law. 14.Severance Pay In the event an Executive Manager is terminated without cause, he or she shall receive compensation in a lump sum cash payment equal to nine (9) months of his or her annual salary and health insurance payments. The aforementioned severance pay shall not be reduced during the term of their employment. Notwithstanding the aforementioned severance terms, if an Executive Manager has an employment contract their severance payment shall be as set forth in their employment contract/offer letter. 15.Special Assignment Pay Executive Managers may receive up to 10% additional compensation when assigned by the City Manager to a special project. 16.Educational and Uniform Allowances The Chief of Police and Fire Chief will be provided with the uniform allowance and educational differentials as specified in the POA and IAFF MOUs respectively. (Remainder of page intentionally left blank.) 36 Page 8 of 37 II.SENIOR MANAGEMENT GROUP (ALL EMPLOYEES PROVIDED FOR IN THIS GROUP ARE FLSA-EXEMPT) A. SALARY & WAGES 1. Salary Increases a. For Fiscal Year 2017-2018 all Senior Management positions shall receive a 2% salary adjustment the first full pay period of July 2017. b. For Fiscal Year 2018-2019 all Senior Management positions shall receive a 2% salary adjustment the first full pay period of July 2018. c. For Fiscal Year 2019-2020 all Senior Management positions shall receive a 2% salary adjustment the first full pay period of July 2019. B. BENEFITS 1. Deferred Compensation Plan 457 Plan - Employees in the Senior Management Group may participate in the City's approved deferred compensation plans. 2. Cafeteria Plan a. In calendar year 2017, Senior Managers will receive $15,136 annually to be used for the purchase of approved employee benefits or to be placed in a taxable cash option. 1. For calendar year 2017 the maximum taxable option shall be $13,726 2. For calendar year 2018 the maximum taxable option shall be $11,000 3. For calendar year 2019 the maximum taxable option shall be $9,000 4. For calendar year 2020 the maximum taxable option shall be $7,000 b. In the event of increases in health care plan premiums, the City will split the cost of the increase 50/50 with the employees. The annual cafeteria plan allotment will be increased by one-half of the average cost increase for full family non-indemnity health plan premiums. The City's share of the increased cost will be added to the beginning cafeteria plan balance of the next available cafeteria plan year. c. From the annual Cafeteria Plan allotment, each employee must elect medical coverage under one of the City sponsored plans, unless the employee has group medical insurance from another source including coverage under their City employee spouse’s plan in which case they may waive coverage so long as the alternative plan is deemed to be an acceptable plan by the City. When waiving coverage the full value of the Cafeteria Plan allotment will be available to purchase any of the other options available under the Cafeteria Plan. Waiver of coverage is irrevocable during a plan year unless the City is notified within 30 days that the employee has involuntarily lost the alternative coverage.37 Page 9 of 37 d. The Flex Benefit Amount for Employee Only, those with coverage outside of the City, and those employees covered by another City Employee is fixed at the amount provided in the calendar year 2013 ($13,762). The flex amount for Employee+1 and Employee+Family will be adjusted under the current 50/50 cost sharing formula. 3. Short/Long Term Disability Insurance The City will pay the full cost of the short/long-term disability insurance premium for Senior Managers. 4. Retiree Healthcare The City will no longer provide for subsidized retiree health care rates by offering a blended healthcare rate for employees hired after January 1, 2011. 5. Post Employment Health Plan Employees in the Senior Management Group may participate in a Post Employment Health Plan (PEHP), funded with mandatory eligible employee contributions, specifically any unused vacation balances due to the employee at the time of retirement will be rolled over into the PEHP. Those employees not wishing to participate may sell back up to 100% of vacation (annual) balances the last full pay period of employment prior to retirement. 6. Life Insurance City pays for a Group Term Life and AD&A insurance policy with coverage in the amount of $50,000 per employee. 7. Retirement The City will provide to unrepresented members retirement benefits via contract with the California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) as set forth in the California Government Code. The City will provide the following defined benefit formulas: Tier 1 Local Miscellaneous 3% @ 60 Local Safety 3% @ 50 Tier 2*Local Miscellaneous 2% @ 60 Local Safety 3% @ 55 Tier 3**Local Miscellaneous 2% @ 62 Local Safety 2.7% @ 57 * Effective 04/22/2011 **Effective 01/01/2013 38 Page 10 of 37 Tier 1: Local Miscellaneous 3% @ 60 and Local Safety 3% @ 50 Pension Contributions: PEPRA provides that equal sharing of normal costs shall be the standard. To reach that standard, Tier 1 Employees will continue to make the required employee contribution (with no EPMC) of 8% for Local Miscellaneous and 9% for local Safety, but will also contribute the below amounts (in a phased in manner) to the employer’s side (pursuant to Government Code (GC) section 20516) to reach the CalPERS standard of equal sharing of normal costs. Accordingly, Tier 1 Employees shall make the following pension contributions. Local Miscellaneous unrepresented employees in Tier 1 shall contribute 8%, which will be applied to the employee’s contribution to CalPERS. There shall be no EPMC. In addition, Local Miscellaneous unrepresented employees in Tier 1 shall also contribute the amounts stated below on the employer’s side (GC 20516) until equal sharing of normal costs is reached: Up to 1% in the first full pay period of July 2017 on the employer’s (for a total contribution of 9% (8% employee side and 1% employer side)), not to exceed 50% of normal cost as determined by City’s Actuary Up to an additional 1% on the employer’s side in the first full pay period of July 2018 (for a total of 10% (8% employee side and up to 2% employer side)), not to exceed 50% of normal cost as determined by City’s Actuary First full pay period of July 2019, 50% of normal cost as determined by City’s Actuary (including 8% on employee side plus additional amount paid to employer’s side) Local Safety unrepresented employees in Tier 1 shall contribute 9%, which will be applied to the employee’s contribution to CalPERS. There shall be no EPMC. In addition, Local Safety unrepresented employees in Tier 1 shall also contribute the amounts stated below on the employer’s side (GC 20516) until equal sharing of normal costs is reached: Up to 1% in the first full pay period of July 2017 on the employer’s (for a total contribution of 10% (9% employee side and 1% employer side)), not to exceed 50% of normal cost as determined by City’s Actuary Up to an additional 1% on the employer’s side in the first full pay period of July 2018 (for a total of 11% (9% employee side and up to 2% employer side)), not to exceed 50% of normal cost as determined by City’s Actuary Up to an additional 1% on the employer’s side in the first full pay period of July 2018 (for a total of 12% (% employee side and up to 3% employer side)), not to exceed 50% of normal cost as determined by City’s Actuary The following is a summary of Tier 1 CalPERS contract provisions: A. One-Year Final Compensation B. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance C. Credit for Unused Sick Leave D. 4th Level 1959 Survivor Benefit. E. Military Service Credit as Prior Service 39 Page 11 of 37 F. Cost of Living Allowance (2%) G. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance Continuance H. Pre-Retirement Death Benefit for Spouse I. Retired Death Benefit $5,000 J. Prior Service Credit The contributions on the employer’s side (GC 20516) described above are “up to” amounts per fiscal year meaning the employee may be required to contribute up the full amount listed, but the amounts may be less. For example, in FY 2017- 18, the amount for Tier 1 is expected to be the full 1% of GC 20516 contribution, but for Tier 2 (miscellaneous) the amount is expected to be a 0.2% GC 20516 contribution. In addition, the contribution amounts will be based on the City Actuary’s review of most recent CalPERS Annual Valuation Report. For FY 17/18 the most recent Annual Valuation Report was as of June 30, 2015. Tier 2: Local Miscellaneous 2% @ 60 and Local Safety 3% @ 55 Pension Contributions: PEPRA provides that equal sharing of normal costs shall be the standard. To meet that standard, Employees will continue to make the required employee contribution (with no EPMC) of 7% for Local Miscellaneous and 9% for local Safety, but will also contribute (in a phased in manner) to the employer’s side (Government Code (GC) section 20516) to reach the CalPERS standard of equal sharing of normal costs. Accordingly, Tier 2 employees shall make the following pension contributions. Local Miscellaneous unrepresented employees in Tier 2 shall contribute 7%, which will be applied to the employee contribution to CalPERS. There shall be no EPMC. In addition, Local Miscellaneous unrepresented employees in Tier 2 shall also contribute the amounts stated below on the employer’s side (GC 20516) until equal sharing of normal costs is reached: Up to 1% in the first full pay period of July 2017 on the employer’s (for a total contribution of 8% (7% employee side and 1% employer side)), not to exceed 50% of normal cost as determined by City’s Actuary Up to an additional 1% on the employer’s side in the first full pay period of July 2018 (for a total of 9% (7% employee side and up to 2% employer side)), not to exceed 50% of normal cost as determined by City’s Actuary First full pay period of July 2019, 50% of normal cost as determined by City’s Actuary (including 7% on employee side plus additional amount paid to employer’s side) Local Safety unrepresented employees in Tier 2 shall contribute 9%, which will be applied to the employee’s contribution to CalPERS. There shall be no EPMC. In addition, Local Safety unrepresented employees in Tier 2 shall also contribute the amounts stated below on the employer’s side (GC 20516) until equal sharing of normal costs is reached: Up to 1% in the first full pay period of July 2017 on the employer’s (for a total contribution of 10% (9% employee side and 1% employer side)), not to exceed 50% of normal cost as determined by City’s Actuary 40 Page 12 of 37 Up to an additional 1% on the employer’s side in the first full pay period of July 2018 (for a total of 11% (9% employee side and up to 2% employer side)), not to exceed 50% of normal cost as determined by City’s Actuary Up to an additional 1% on the employer’s side in the first full pay period of July 2018 (for a total of 12% (9% employee side and up to 3% employer side)), not to exceed 50% of normal cost as determined by City’s Actuary The following is a summary of Tier 2 CalPERS contract provisions: A. Three-Year Final Compensation B. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance C. Credit for Unused Sick Leave D. 4th Level 1959 Survivor Benefit. E. Military Service Credit as Prior Service F. Cost of Living Allowance (2%) G. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance Continuance H. Pre-Retirement Death Benefit for Spouse I. Retired Death Benefit $5,000 J. Prior Service Credit The contributions on the employer’s side (GC 20516) described above are “up to” amounts per fiscal year meaning the employee may be required to contribute up the full amount listed, but the amounts may be less. For example, in FY 2017- 18, the amount for Tier 1 is expected to be the full 1% of GC 20516 contribution, but for Tier 2 (local miscellaneous) the amount is expected to be a 0.2% GC 20516 contribution. In addition, the contribution amounts will be based on the City Actuary’s review of most recent CalPERS Annual Valuation Report. For FY 17/18 the most recent Annual Valuation Report was as of June 30, 2015. Tier 3: Local Miscellaneous 2% @ 62 and Local Safety 2.7% @ 57 Local Miscellaneous and Local Safety unrepresented employees in Tier 3 shall be responsible for the full employee contribution which will be applied to the CalPERS employee contribution. There shall be no EPMC. PEPRA provides that equal sharing of the normal costs shall be the standard. To meet this standard, Tier 3 employees shall also make additional contributions on the employer’s side (GC 20516) (in up to 1% percent increments per fiscal year, as determined by the City’s actuary) to attain the equal cost sharing of normal costs standard. As of the approval of this Compensation Summary by City Council, no such contributions are expected the 2017-2018 Fiscal Year. To the extent permitted by Assembly Bill 340, known as the California Public Employees’ Pension Reform Act of 2013, the following is a summary of Tier 3 benefits: A. Three-Year Final Compensation B. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance C. Credit for Unused Sick Leave 41 Page 13 of 37 D. 4th Level 1959 Survivor Benefit. The monthly member cost for this benefit will be paid by the City. E. Military Service Credit as Prior Service F. Cost of Living Allowance (2%) G. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance Continuance H. Pre-Retirement Death Benefit for Spouse I. Retired Death Benefit $5,000 J. Prior Service Credit 8. Termination of Sick Leave Balances Upon either acceptance of an application by a Safety employee for disability retirement, or upon the independent determination of PERS that a non-safety employee is disabled, the employee shall not be entitled to use any remaining sick leave to cover absences beyond their FMLA entitlement. Sick leave balance may be applied to applicable PERS service credit. An application for industrial disability retirement, either employee or employer initiated, shall not affect the employee's rights under Workers Compensation laws, such as any otherwise existing right to Temporary Disability benefits for safety officers. 9. Sick Leave Sick leave shall accrue and be reimbursed as designated in the Civil Service Rules 10.Annual Leave a. Senior Managers shall earn a minimum of three weeks (15 days) annual leave per year during the first through ninth year of continuous service, four weeks (20 days) annual leave after completion of tenth through fourteenth year of continuous service, and five weeks (25 days) annual leave for fifteen or more years of continuous service. An employee may not accumulate more than three times the number of annual leave days accrued annually. b. Senior Managers have the option of selling back three (3) weeks of accrued annual leave each fiscal year. 11.Holidays a. Senior Managers will be credited 24 hours each fiscal year for floating holidays (Lincoln's and Washington's Birthdays, and Admission Day). b. The City will be closed on the following hard holidays: Independence Day, Labor Day, Veterans Day, Thanksgiving, day after Thanksgiving, Christmas, New Year's Day, Martin Luther King Jr.'s Birthday, Cesar Chavez Day, Memorial Day. 12.Mileage Reimbursement Employees in this unit shall be subject to a mileage reimbursement program when required to use their private automobile for authorized City business. Reimbursement rate will be tied to the IRS rate, in effect at the time reimbursement is requested, as permitted by law.42 Page 14 of 37 13.Administrative Leave Senior Managers will receive (ninety-six) (96) hours of Administrative Leave each fiscal year. 14.Special Assignment Pay Senior Managers may receive up to 10% additional compensation when assigned by the City Manager to a special project. 15.Uniform Allowances and Educational Differentials Sworn public safety Senior Managers will be provided with the uniform allowance and educational differentials as specified in the applicable public safety MOU. 16.Professional Enrichment Senior Managers are eligible to participate in the City’s Professional Enrichment Program. The annual Professional Enrichment allocation for Senior Managers of $25,000 is for exclusive use by members of the Senior Management group for conferences and training. An employee is eligible to receive up to $2,000 per fiscal year for professional enrichment. Funds may be used at any time during the fiscal year. Fiscal year reimbursements under the City’s “Professional Enrichment” will be closed the second Thursday in June. Employees may request reimbursement for professional enrichment expenses in accordance with Internal Revenue Code Section 132, or any other applicable state and federal law. Employees must receive approval from their Appointing Authority and the City Manager’s designee before funds may be claimed for reimbursement. Reimbursements are on a first come, first serve basis until the funds have been exhausted. 17.Severance Pay In the event a Senior Manager is terminated without cause, he or she shall receive compensation in a lump sum cash payment equal to three (3) months of his or her annual salary. The aforementioned severance pay shall not be reduced during the term of their employment. 43 Page 15 of 37 III.UNCLASSIFIED AND CONFIDENTIAL MIDDLE MANAGEMENT/ PROFESSIONAL GROUP – ALL EMPLOYEES PROVIDED FOR IN THIS GROUP ARE FLSA-EXEMPT; CONFIDENTIAL MIDDLE MANAGERS/PROFESSIONALS ARE CLASSIFIED UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED IN ATTACHMENT 1 – GROUP MEMBERSHIP LISTING. A. SALARY & WAGES 1. For Fiscal Year 2017-2018 - effective July7, 2017, 2%. B. BENEFITS 1. Acting Pay Unclassified and Confidential Middle Managers/Professionals shall receive Acting Pay when: a. They are temporarily assigned to a vacant position for a period of ten (10) or more consecutive work days; b. Perform the duties of a higher paid classification; and c. Receive prior approval by the City Manager or his or her designee prior to the assignment. Acting pay shall be: a. Compensated with a minimum of five percent (5%) above current salary rate, up to a maximum of 20%. b. Effective the first day of the assignment. 2. Out of Class Assignment a. Unclassified and Confidential Middle Managers/Professionals shall receive Out of Class Assignment (OCA) pay when: They are assigned to perform the duties of a higher paid classification for a period of ten (10) or more consecutive workdays; and b. Receive prior approval by the City Manager or his or her designee prior to the assignment. Out-of-Class Assignment pay shall: a. Be compensated with a minimum of five percent (5%) above current salary rate, up to a maximum of 20%. b. Be effective the first day of the assignment. c. Not exceed twelve months. Note: For clarification, OCA is differentiated from Acting Pay in that OCA is granted to an employee remaining in their current classification, but performing higher level duties even though no vacancy may exist at the higher level. Acting Pay is granted to employees assuming the duties of a vacant, higher level position for a period of time. 3. Retirement The City will provide to unrepresented members retirement benefits via contract with the California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) as set forth in the California Government Code.44 Page 16 of 37 The City will provide the following defined benefit formulas: Tier 1 Local Miscellaneous 3% @ 60 Local Safety 3% @ 50 Tier 2*Local Miscellaneous 2% @ 60 Local Safety 3% @ 55 Tier 3**Local Miscellaneous 2% @ 62 Local Safety 2.7% @ 57 * Effective 04/22/2011 **Effective 01/01/2013 Tier 1: Local Miscellaneous 3% @ 60 and Local Safety 3% @ 50 Local Miscellaneous unrepresented employees in Tier 1 shall contribute 8%, which will be applied to the employee contribution to CalPERS. Local Safety unrepresented employees in Tier 1 shall contribute 9%, which will be applied to the employee contribution to CalPERS. There shall be no EPMC (effective October 2, 2015) for classifications without a represented counterpart. The following is a summary of Tier 1 CalPERS contract provisions: A. One-Year Final Compensation B. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance C. Credit for Unused Sick Leave D. 4th Level 1959 Survivor Benefit. E. Military Service Credit as Prior Service F. Cost of Living Allowance (2%) G. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance Continuance H. Pre-Retirement Death Benefit for Spouse I. Retired Death Benefit $5,000 J. Prior Service Credit Tier 2: Local Miscellaneous 2% @ 60 and Local Safety 3% @ 55 Local Miscellaneous unrepresented employees in Tier 2 shall contribute 7%, which will be applied to the employee contribution to CalPERS. Local Safety unrepresented employees in Tier 2 shall contribute 9%, which will be applied to the employee contribution to CalPERS. There shall be no EPMC. 45 Page 17 of 37 The following is a summary of Tier 2 CalPERS contract provisions: A. Three-Year Final Compensation B. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance C. Credit for Unused Sick Leave D. 4th Level 1959 Survivor Benefit. E. Military Service Credit as Prior Service F. Cost of Living Allowance (2%) G. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance Continuance H. Pre-Retirement Death Benefit for Spouse I. Retired Death Benefit $5,000 J. Prior Service Credit Tier 3: Local Miscellaneous 2% @ 62 and Local Safety 2.7% @ 57 Local Miscellaneous and Local Safety unrepresented employees in Tier 3 shall be responsible for the full employee contribution, which will be applied to the CalPERS employee contribution. There shall be no EPMC. To the extent permitted by Assembly Bill 340, known as the California Public Employees’ Pension Reform Act of 2013, the following is a summary of Tier 3 benefits: A. Three-Year Final Compensation B. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance C. Credit for Unused Sick Leave D. 4th Level 1959 Survivor Benefit. The monthly member cost for this benefit will be paid by the City. E. Military Service Credit as Prior Service F. Cost of Living Allowance (2%) G. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance Continuance H. Pre-Retirement Death Benefit for Spouse I. Retired Death Benefit $5,000 J. Prior Service Credit 4. Termination of Sick Leave Balances Upon either acceptance of an application by a Safety employee for disability retirement, or upon the independent determination of PERS that a non-safety employee is disabled, the employee shall not be entitled to use any remaining sick leave to cover absences beyond their FMLA entitlement. Sick leave balance may be applied to applicable PERS service credit. An application for industrial disability retirement, either employee or employer initiated, shall not affect the employee's rights under Workers Compensation laws, such as any otherwise existing right to Temporary Disability benefits for safety officers. 5. 457 Plan – Deferred Compensation Plans Employees in the Unclassified and Confidential Middle Management/Professional Group may participate in the City's approved deferred compensation plans.46 Page 18 of 37 6. Cafeteria Plan a. In calendar year 2017, each Unclassified and Confidential Middle Manager/Professional will receive $14,136 to be used solely for approved employee benefits or to be placed in a taxable cash option. b. In the event of increases in health care plan premiums, the City will split the cost of the increase 50/50 with the employees. The annual cafeteria plan allotment will be increased by one-half of the average cost increase for full family non- non-indemnity health plan premiums. The City's share of the increased cost will be added to the beginning cafeteria plan balance of the next available cafeteria plan year. c. From the Cafeteria Plan allotment, each represented employee must select coverage for him or herself under one of the City sponsored medical plans. However, if the employee has group medical insurance from another reliable source that is acceptable to the City of Chula Vista Department of Human Resources, the employee may elect to decline medical insurance from a City provider and apply the value, of the City’s “Flexible Benefit Plan” contribution to other available City Flex options. Any employee married to another benefited City employee who is covered under his or her spouse’s plan may waive coverage under the Cafeteria Plan and will receive full credit. Any employee who declines medical insurance coverage may enroll in the City medical plan prior to the next open enrollment only if the employee involuntarily loses the coverage. Enrollment application must be received in Human Resources within 30 days from loss of coverage. The employee, through payroll deductions, will pay any premium cost in excess of the Cafeteria Plan Allotment. d. The Flex Benefit Amount for Employee Only, those with coverage outside of the City, and those employees covered by another City Employee is fixed at the amount provided in the calendar year 2013 ($12,762). The flex amount for Employee+1 and Employee+Family will be adjusted under the current 50/50 cost sharing formula. 7. Life Insurance City pays for a group term life insurance policy with coverage in the amount of $50,000 per employee. 8. Retiree Healthcare The City will no longer provide for subsidized retiree health care rates by offering a blended healthcare rate for employees hired after January 1, 2011. 9. Short/Long Term Disability Insurance The City will pay the full cost of the short/long-term disability insurance premium for middle management positions. 47 Page 19 of 37 10.Professional Enrichment The Unclassified and Confidential Middle Managers/Professionals are eligible to participate in the City’s Professional Enrichment Program. The annual Professional Enrichment Fund allocation for Unclassified and Confidential Professional Enrichment Fund of $15,600 is for exclusive use by members of the Unclassified and Confidential Middle Management/Professional group for conferences and training. An employee is eligible to receive up to $1,500 per fiscal year for professional enrichment. Funds may be used at any time during the fiscal year. Fiscal year reimbursements under the City’s “Professional Enrichment” will be closed the second Thursday in June. Employees may request reimbursement for professional enrichment expenses in accordance with Internal Revenue Code Section 132, or any other applicable state and federal law. Employees must receive approval from their Appointing Authority and the City Manager’s designee before funds may be claimed for reimbursement. Reimbursements are on a first come, first serve basis until the funds have been exhausted. 11.Sick Leave Reimbursement Sick leave shall accrue and be reimbursed as designated in the Civil Service Rules. 12.Annual Leave a. Unclassified and Confidential Middle Managers/Professionals will earn two weeks (10 days) annual leave per year in the first through fourth year of continuous employment, three weeks (15 days) annual leave per year in the fifth through ninth year of continuous service, four weeks annual leave (20 days) per year in the tenth through fourteenth year of continuous service, and five weeks annual leave (25 days) for fifteen or more years of continuous service. An employee may not accumulate more than three times the number of annual leave days accrued annually. b. Unclassified and Confidential Middle Managers/Professionals who have completed at least five (5) years of service shall have the option of selling back a total of 80 hours of accrued annual leave two times per fiscal year in 40 hour increments. 13.Administrative Leave Unclassified and Confidential Middle Managers/Professionals, will receive eighty- eighty (88) hours of Administrative Leave each fiscal year. 14.Holidays a. Unclassified and Confidential Middle Managers/Professionals will receive 24 hours each fiscal year for floating holidays (Lincoln's and Washington's Birthdays, and Admission Day). b. The City will be closed on the following hard holidays: Independence Day, Labor Day, Veterans Day, Thanksgiving, Day After Thanksgiving, Christmas, New Year's Day, Martin Luther King Jr.'s Birthday, Cesar Chavez Day, Memorial Day.48 Page 20 of 37 15.Mileage Reimbursement Unclassified and Confidential Middle Managers/Professionals shall be subject to a mileage reimbursement program when required to use their private automobile for authorized City business. Reimbursement rate will be tied to the IRS rate, in effect at the time reimbursement is requested, as permitted by law. 16.Uniform Allowances & Educational Differentials Sworn public safety Unclassified and Confidential Middle Managers/Professionals will be provided with the uniform allowances and educational differentials as specified in the applicable public safety MOU. 17.Bilingual Pay Those Unclassified and Confidential Middle Managers/Professionals who, upon recommendation of their Department Head, approval of the Director of Human Resources, and successful completion of a bilingual performance evaluation will receive $100 per month in addition to their regular pay on the condition that they continuously utilize their bilingual skills in the performance of their duties effective the first full pay period after adoption. 18.Special Assignment Pay Unclassified and Confidential Middle Managers/Professionals may receive up to 10% additional compensation when assigned by the City Manager to a special project. 49 Page 21 of 37 IV.CONFIDENTIAL GROUP – ARE CLASSIFIED UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED IN ATTACHMENT 1 – GROUP MEMBERSHIP LISTING. A. SALARY & WAGES 1. Salary Increases a. For Fiscal Year 2017-2018 all Confidential positions shall receive a 2% salary adjustment and a one-time $750 non PERSable stipend effective pay period beginning December 22, 2017. b. For Fiscal Year 2018-2019 all Confidential positions shall receive a 2% salary adjustment the first full pay period of July 2018. c. For Fiscal Year 2019-2020 all Confidential positions shall receive a 2% salary adjustment the first full pay period of July 2019. B. BENEFITS 1. Retirement The City will provide to unrepresented members retirement benefits via contract with the California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) as set forth in the California Government Code. The City will provide the following defined benefit formulas: Tier 1 Local Miscellaneous 3% @ 60 Local Safety 3% @ 50 Tier 2*Local Miscellaneous 2% @ 60 Local Safety 3% @ 55 Tier 3**Local Miscellaneous 2% @ 62 Local Safety 2.7% @ 57 * Effective 04/22/2011 **Effective 01/01/2013 Tier 1: Local Miscellaneous 3% @ 60 and Local Safety 3% @ 50 Pension Contributions: PEPRA provides that equal sharing of normal costs shall be the standard. To reach that standard, Tier 1 Employees will continue to make the required employee contribution (with no EPMC) of 8% for Local Miscellaneous and 9% for local Safety, but will also contribute the below amounts (in a phased in manner) to the employer’s side (pursuant to Government Code (GC) section 20516) to reach the CalPERS standard of equal sharing of normal costs. Accordingly, Tier 1 Employees shall make the following pension contributions. 50 Page 22 of 37 Local Miscellaneous unrepresented employees in Tier 1 shall contribute 8%, which will be applied to the employee’s contribution to CalPERS. There shall be no EPMC. In addition, Local Miscellaneous unrepresented employees in Tier 1 shall also contribute the amounts stated below on the employer’s side (GC 20516) until equal sharing of normal costs is reached: Up to 1% effective pay period beginning December 22, 2017 on the employer’s (for a total contribution of 9% (8% employee side and 1% employer side)), not to exceed 50% of normal cost as determined by City’s Actuary Up to an additional 1% on the employer’s side in the first full pay period of July 2018 (for a total of 10% (8% employee side and up to 2% employer side)), not to exceed 50% of normal cost as determined by City’s Actuary First full pay period of July 2019, 50% of normal cost as determined by City’s Actuary (including 8% on employee side plus additional amount paid to employer’s side) Local Safety unrepresented employees in Tier 1 shall contribute 9%, which will be applied to the employee’s contribution to CalPERS. There shall be no EPMC. In addition, Local Safety unrepresented employees in Tier 1 shall also contribute the amounts stated below on the employer’s side (GC 20516) until equal sharing of normal costs is reached: Up to 1 effective pay period beginning December 22, 2017 on the employer’s (for a total contribution of 10% (9% employee side and 1% employer side)), not to exceed 50% of normal cost as determined by City’s Actuary Up to an additional 1% on the employer’s side in the first full pay period of July 2018 (for a total of 11% (9% employee side and up to 2% employer side)), not to exceed 50% of normal cost as determined by City’s Actuary Up to an additional 1% on the employer’s side in the first full pay period of July 2018 (for a total of 12% (% employee side and up to 3% employer side)), not to exceed 50% of normal cost as determined by City’s Actuary The following is a summary of Tier 1 CalPERS contract provisions: K. One-Year Final Compensation L. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance M. Credit for Unused Sick Leave N. 4th Level 1959 Survivor Benefit. O. Military Service Credit as Prior Service P. Cost of Living Allowance (2%) Q. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance Continuance R. Pre-Retirement Death Benefit for Spouse 51 Page 23 of 37 S. Retired Death Benefit $5,000 T. Prior Service Credit The contributions on the employer’s side (GC 20516) described above are “up to” amounts per fiscal year meaning the employee may be required to contribute up the full amount listed, but the amounts may be less. For example, in FY 2017- 18, the amount for Tier 1 is expected to be the full 1% of GC 20516 contribution, but for Tier 2 (miscellaneous) the amount is expected to be a 0.2% GC 20516 contribution. In addition, the contribution amounts will be based on the City Actuary’s review of most recent CalPERS Annual Valuation Report. For FY 17/18 the most recent Annual Valuation Report was as of June 30, 2015. Tier 2: Local Miscellaneous 2% @ 60 and Local Safety 3% @ 55 Pension Contributions: PEPRA provides that equal sharing of normal costs shall be the standard. To meet that standard, Employees will continue to make the required employee contribution (with no EPMC) of 7% for Local Miscellaneous and 9% for local Safety, but will also contribute (in a phased in manner) to the employer’s side (Government Code (GC) section 20516) to reach the CalPERS standard of equal sharing of normal costs. Accordingly, Tier 2 employees shall make the following pension contributions. Local Miscellaneous unrepresented employees in Tier 2 shall contribute 7%, which will be applied to the employee contribution to CalPERS. There shall be no EPMC. In addition, Local Miscellaneous unrepresented employees in Tier 2 shall also contribute the amounts stated below on the employer’s side (GC 20516) until equal sharing of normal costs is reached: Up to 1% effective pay period beginning December 22, 2017 on the employer’s (for a total contribution of 8% (7% employee side and 1% employer side)), not to exceed 50% of normal cost as determined by City’s Actuary Up to an additional 1% on the employer’s side in the first full pay period of July 2018 (for a total of 9% (7% employee side and up to 2% employer side)), not to exceed 50% of normal cost as determined by City’s Actuary First full pay period of July 2019, 50% of normal cost as determined by City’s Actuary (including 7% on employee side plus additional amount paid to employer’s side) Local Safety unrepresented employees in Tier 2 shall contribute 9%, which will be applied to the employee’s contribution to CalPERS. There shall be no EPMC. In addition, Local Safety unrepresented employees in Tier 2 shall also contribute the amounts stated below on the employer’s side (GC 20516) until equal sharing of normal costs is reached: Up to 1% effective pay period beginning December 22, 2017 on the employer’s (for a total contribution of 10% (9% employee side and 1% employer side)), not to exceed 50% of normal cost as determined by 52 Page 24 of 37 City’s Actuary Up to an additional 1% on the employer’s side in the first full pay period of July 2018 (for a total of 11% (9% employee side and up to 2% employer side)), not to exceed 50% of normal cost as determined by City’s Actuary Up to an additional 1% on the employer’s side in the first full pay period of July 2018 (for a total of 12% (9% employee side and up to 3% employer side)), not to exceed 50% of normal cost as determined by City’s Actuary The following is a summary of Tier 2 CalPERS contract provisions: K. Three-Year Final Compensation L. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance M. Credit for Unused Sick Leave N. 4th Level 1959 Survivor Benefit. O. Military Service Credit as Prior Service P. Cost of Living Allowance (2%) Q. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance Continuance R. Pre-Retirement Death Benefit for Spouse S. Retired Death Benefit $5,000 T. Prior Service Credit Tier 3: Local Miscellaneous 2% @ 62 and Local Safety 2.7% @ 57 Local Miscellaneous and Local Safety unrepresented employees in Tier 3 shall be responsible for the full employee contribution which will be applied to the CalPERS employee contribution. There shall be no EPMC. PEPRA provides that equal sharing of the normal costs shall be the standard. To meet this standard, Tier 3 employees shall also make additional contributions on the employer’s side (GC 20516) (in up to 1% percent increments per fiscal year, as determined by the City’s actuary) to attain the equal cost sharing of normal costs standard. As of the approval of this Compensation Summary by City Council, no such contributions are expected the 2017-2018 Fiscal Year. To the extent permitted by Assembly Bill 340, known as the California Public Employees’ Pension Reform Act of 2013, the following is a summary of Tier 3 benefits: K. Three-Year Final Compensation L. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance M. Credit for Unused Sick Leave N. 4th Level 1959 Survivor Benefit. The monthly member cost for this benefit will be paid by the City. O. Military Service Credit as Prior Service P. Cost of Living Allowance (2%) Q. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance Continuance R. Pre-Retirement Death Benefit for Spouse 53 Page 25 of 37 S. Retired Death Benefit $5,000 T. Prior Service Credit 2. Termination of Sick Leave Balances Upon either acceptance of an application by a Safety employee for disability retirement, or upon the independent determination of CalPERS that a non-safety employee is disabled, the employee shall not be entitled to use any remaining sick leave to cover absences beyond their FMLA entitlement. Sick leave balances may be applied to applicable CalPERS service credit. An application for industrial disability retirement, either employee or employer initiated, shall not affect the employee's rights under Workers’ Compensation laws, such as any otherwise existing right to Temporary Disability benefits for safety officers. 3. Deferred Compensation Plans 457 Plan - Employees in the Confidential Group may participate in the City's approved deferred compensation plans. 4. Cafeteria Plan a. In calendar year 2017, each Confidential Employee will receive $13,760 to be used solely for approved employee benefits. b. In the event of increases in health care plan premiums, the City will split the cost of the increase 50/50 with the employees. The annual cafeteria plan allotment will be increased by one-half of the average cost increase for full family non-indemnity health plan premiums. The City's share of the increased cost will be added to the beginning cafeteria plan balance of the next available cafeteria plan year. c. From the annual Cafeteria Plan allotment, each employee must elect medical coverage under one of the City sponsored plans, unless the employee has group medical insurance from another source including coverage under their City employee spouse’s plan in which case they may waive coverage so long as the alternative plan is deemed to be an acceptable plan by the City. When waiving coverage the full value of the Cafeteria Plan allotment will be available to purchase any of the other options available under the Cafeteria Plan. Waiver of coverage is irrevocable during a plan year unless the City is notified within 30 days that the employee has involuntarily lost the alternative coverage. d. The Flex Benefit Amount for Employee Only, those with coverage outside of the City, and those employees covered by another City Employee is fixed at the amount provided in the calendar year 2013 ($12,386). The flex amount for Employee+1 and Employee+Family will be adjusted under the current 50/50 cost sharing formula. e. Employees hired into a Confidential position on or before December 31, 2017 may elect to receive up to $9,100 of unused funds as a taxable cash option. 54 Page 26 of 37 The maximum an employee can cash out each year cannot exceed the cash option that they received in the previous calendar year. f. Employees hired into a Confidential position on or after January 1, 2018 shall not cash out unused cafeteria plan funds. 5. Short/Long Term Disability Insurance The City will pay the full cost of the short/long-term disability insurance premium for the Confidential employees. 6. Retiree Healthcare The City will no longer provide for subsidized retiree health care rates by offering a blended healthcare rate for employees hired after January 1, 2011. 7. Professional Enrichment The Confidential Employees Professional Enrichment Fund of $6,250 is for exclusive use by members of the Confidential Employees for conferences and training. Employees may receive up to a maximum of $2,000 per fiscal year. Funds may be used at any time during the fiscal year. Fiscal year reimbursements under the City’s “Professional Enrichment” will be closed the second Thursday in June. Employees may request reimbursement for professional enrichment expenses in accordance with Internal Revenue Code Section 132, or any other applicable state and federal law. Employees must receive approval from their Appointing Authority and the City Manager’s designee before funds may be claimed for reimbursement. Reimbursements are on a first come, first serve basis until the funds have been exhausted. 8. Life Insurance City pays for a Group Term Life and AD&D insurance policy with coverage in the amount of $50,000 per employee. 9. Sick Leave Sick leave shall accrue and be reimbursed as designated in the Civil Service Rules. 10.Annual Leave a. Employees will accrue 80-hours during the first through fourth years of service (cumulative to a total leave balance of 240-hours). This benefit will be accumulated at the rate of 3.07 working hours for each full biweekly pay period of service performed. b. Employees will accrue and be eligible to receive 120-hours (cumulative to a total leave balance of 360-hours) during the fifth through ninth year of service. The benefits will be accumulated at the rate of 4.60 working hours for each full biweekly pay period of service performed. c. Employees will accrue and be eligible to receive 160-hours (cumulative to a total leave balance of 480-hours) during the tenth through fourteenth years of 55 Page 27 of 37 service. This benefit will be accumulated at the rate of 6.14 working hours for each full biweekly pay period of service performed. d. Employees will accrue and be eligible to receive 200-hours (cumulative to a total leave balance of 600-hours) during the fifteenth and succeeding years of service. This benefit will be accumulated at the rate of 7.70 working hours for each full biweekly pay period of service performed. e. Vacation accrual rate changes will become effective at the beginning of the pay period closest to the actual date which includes the employee anniversary date of benefited status. f. Vacation sell back – All confidential unrepresented classifications who have completed at least five (5) years of service shall have the option of selling up to 60-hours of said vacation back to the City one time per fiscal year. The accumulated vacation balance will be reduced accordingly. g. Each part time confidential unrepresented employee paid at a biweekly rate shall be entitled to vacation with pay. The number of working days of such vacation shall be computed on the basis set forth in subsection (a), (b), (c), or (d) and shall be in the proportion that such part time employment bears to full time employment. h. Employees separated from City service, whether voluntarily or involuntarily, shall be granted all of the unused vacation to which they are entitled based upon continuous service computed on the basis set forth in subsection (a), (b), (c), or (d). Payment shall be made hour-for-hour with any portion of an hour being considered a full hour. i.Vacation Use: Vacation leave balances shall be reduced for actual time not worked to the nearest quarter hour. Absences may not be charged to vacation not already accumulated. 11.Holidays a. Confidential employees will receive 32 hours each fiscal year for floating holidays (Lincoln's and Washington Birthday's, and Admissions Day). b. The City will be closed on the following paid hard holidays: Independence Day, Labor Day, Veterans Day, Thanksgiving, Day after Thanksgiving, Christmas, New Year's Day, Martin Luther King Jr.'s Birthday, Cesar Chavez Day, Memorial Day. 12.Administration Leave Confidential employees will receive forty (40) hours of Administrative Leave each fiscal year. 56 Page 28 of 37 13.Mileage Reimbursement Employees in this unit shall be subject to a mileage reimbursement program when required to use their private automobile for authorized City business. Reimbursement rate will be tied to the IRS rate in effect at the time reimbursement is requested, as permitted by law. 14.Bilingual Pay Those employees who, upon recommendation of the Department Head, approval of the Director of Human Resources Department, and successful completion of a Bilingual Performance Evaluation, and who are required to continuously use their bilingual skills in the performance of their duties, will receive $100 per month in addition to their regular pay effective the first full pay period after adoption. 15.Special Assignment Pay Confidential employees may be eligible to receive a maximum of 15% above their base pay when assigned by the Appointing Authority or designee and approved by the City Manager and the Director of Human Resources to a “Special Project.” 16.Out-of-Class Assignment When an employee is assigned to perform duties of a higher paid classification, immediately upon assignment, the employee shall be compensated with a minimum of 7.5% above the employee’s current salary rate up to a maximum of 15% effective the first day of the out-of-class assignment. If the out of class assignment lasts for duration of 6 months the employee will receive an additional 5% compensation. Increases greater than 5% must be approved by the Director of Human Resources. Requests for out-of-class compensation shall be submitted by the Appointing Authority on a “Payroll Change Notice” form as percentage amounts only. 17.Notice of Change in Work Schedule The City will strive to give at least fourteen calendar day (14 calendar days) notice to employees when management initiates a change in an employee’s work schedule except in cases of emergencies. 57 Page 29 of 37 V.MAYOR, COUNCIL AND CITY ATTORNEY A. SALARY & WAGES 1. Salary Increases As mandated by City of Chula Vista City Charter Section 302 the Mayor shall receive an annual salary equivalent to 66% of the salary of a Judge of the Superior Court of the State of California. As mandated in City of Chula Vista City Charter Section 304(C), the four Council members shall receive 40% of the salary of the Mayor. Salary adjustments will occur at the same time and be effective on the same date as the Superior Court Judges. As mandated by City of Chula Vista City Charter Section 503(C) the City Attorney shall receive an annual salary equivalent to the salary of a Judge of the Superior Court of the State of California. Salary adjustments will occur at the same time and be effective on the same date as the Superior Court Judges. B. BENEFITS 1. Cafeteria Plan Cafeteria plans will be set at the level specified for Executive Managers. The cafeteria plan is to be used solely for approved employee benefits or to be placed in a taxable cash option. From the annual Cafeteria Plan allotment, each employee must elect medical coverage under one of the City sponsored plans, unless the employee has group medical insurance from another source including coverage under their City employee spouse’s plan in which case they may waive coverage so long as the alternative plan is deemed to be an acceptable plan by the City. When waiving coverage the full value of the Cafeteria Plan allotment will be available to purchase any of the other options available under the Cafeteria Plan. Waiver of coverage is irrevocable during a plan year unless the City is notified within 30 days that the employee has involuntarily lost the alternative coverage. The Flex Benefit Amount for Employee Only, those with coverage outside of the City, and those employees covered by another City Employee is fixed at the amount provided in the calendar year 2017 ($16,536). The flex amount for Employee+1 and Employee+Family will be adjusted under the current 50/50 cost sharing formula. a) For calendar year 2017 the maximum taxable option shall be $15,162 b) For calendar year 2018 the maximum taxable option shall be $12,000 c) For calendar year 2019 the maximum taxable option shall be $10,000 d) For calendar year 2020 the maximum taxable option shall be $8,000 2. Retiree Healthcare The City will no longer provide for subsidized retiree health care rates by offering a blended healthcare rate for employees hired after January 1, 2011.58 Page 30 of 37 3. Auto Allowance The Mayor may elect to receive a monthly auto allowance up to $1,000. Council members and City Attorney may elect to receive a monthly auto allowance of up to $550. The allowance is contingent upon evidence of adequate auto insurance. 4. Travel Reimbursements The Mayor and Council members shall receive reimbursement on order of the City Council for Council-authorized travel and other expenses when on official duty outside of the City. 5. Stipends The Mayor and Council members will receive $50 stipend for attending Housing Authority meetings. No member shall receive compensation for attending more than four meetings of the Housing Authority during any calendar month. 6. Retirement The City will provide to unrepresented members retirement benefits via contract with the California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) as set forth in the California Government Code. The City will provide the following defined benefit formulas: Tier 1 Local Miscellaneous 3% @ 60 Local Safety 3% @ 50 Tier 2*Local Miscellaneous 2% @ 60 Local Safety 3% @ 55 Tier 3**Local Miscellaneous 2% @ 62 Local Safety 2.7% @ 57 * Effective 04/22/2011 ** Effective 01/01/2013 Tier 1: Local Miscellaneous 3% @ 60 Pension Contributions: PEPRA provides that equal sharing of normal costs shall be the standard. To reach that standard, Tier 1 Employees will continue to make the required employee contribution (with no EPMC) of 8% for Local Miscellaneous and will contribute the below amounts (in a phased in manner) to the employer’s side (pursuant to Government Code (GC) section 20516) to reach the CalPERS standard of equal sharing of normal costs. Accordingly, Tier 1 Employees shall make the following pension contributions. Local Miscellaneous unrepresented employees in Tier 1 shall contribute 8%, which will be applied to the employee’s contribution to CalPERS. There shall be 59 Page 31 of 37 no EPMC. In addition, Local Miscellaneous unrepresented employees in Tier 1 shall also contribute the amounts stated below on the employer’s side (GC 20516) until equal sharing of normal costs is reached: Up to 1% in the first full pay period of July 2017 on the employer’s (for a total contribution of 9% (8% employee side and 1% employer side)), not to exceed 50% of normal cost as determined by City’s Actuary Up to an additional 1% on the employer’s side in the first full pay period of July 2018 (for a total of 10% (8% employee side and up to 2% employer side)), not to exceed 50% of normal cost as determined by City’s Actuary First full pay period of July 2019, 50% of normal cost as determined by City’s Actuary (including 8% on employee side plus additional amount paid to employer’s side) The following is a summary of Tier 1 CalPERS contract provisions: K. One-Year Final Compensation L. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance M. Credit for Unused Sick Leave N. 4th Level 1959 Survivor Benefit. O. Military Service Credit as Prior Service P. Cost of Living Allowance (2%) Q. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance Continuance R. Pre-Retirement Death Benefit for Spouse S. Retired Death Benefit $5,000 T. Prior Service Credit The contributions on the employer’s side (GC 20516) described above are “up to” amounts per fiscal year meaning the employee may be required to contribute up the full amount listed, but the amounts may be less. For example, in FY 2017- 18, the amount for Tier 1 is expected to be the full 1% of GC 20516 contribution, but for Tier 2 (miscellaneous) the amount is expected to be a 0.2% GC 20516 contribution. In addition, the contribution amounts will be based on the City Actuary’s review of most recent CalPERS Annual Valuation Report. For FY 17/18 the most recent Annual Valuation Report was as of June 30, 2015. Tier 2: Local Miscellaneous 2% @ Pension Contributions: PEPRA provides that equal sharing of normal costs shall be the standard. To meet that standard, Employees will continue to make the required employee contribution (with no EPMC) of 7% for Local Miscellaneous and will also contribute (in a phased in manner) to the employer’s side (Government Code (GC) section 20516) to reach the CalPERS standard of equal sharing of normal costs. Accordingly, Tier 2 employees shall make the following pension contributions. Local Miscellaneous unrepresented employees in Tier 2 shall contribute 7%, which will be applied to the employee contribution to CalPERS. There shall be no EPMC. In addition, Local Miscellaneous unrepresented employees in Tier 2 60 Page 32 of 37 shall also contribute the amounts stated below on the employer’s side (GC 20516) until equal sharing of normal costs is reached: Up to 1% in the first full pay period of July 2017 on the employer’s (for a total contribution of 8% (7% employee side and 1% employer side)), not to exceed 50% of normal cost as determined by City’s Actuary Up to an additional 1% on the employer’s side in the first full pay period of July 2018 (for a total of 9% (7% employee side and up to 2% employer side)), not to exceed 50% of normal cost as determined by City’s Actuary First full pay period of July 2019, 50% of normal cost as determined by City’s Actuary (including 7% on employee side plus additional amount paid to employer’s side) The following is a summary of Tier 2 CalPERS contract provisions: A. Three-Year Final Compensation B. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance C. Credit for Unused Sick Leave D. 4th Level 1959 Survivor Benefit. E. Military Service Credit as Prior Service F. Cost of Living Allowance (2%) G. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance Continuance H. Pre-Retirement Death Benefit for Spouse I. Retired Death Benefit $5,000 J. Prior Service Credit The contributions on the employer’s side (GC 20516) described above are “up to” amounts per fiscal year meaning the employee may be required to contribute up the full amount listed, but the amounts may be less. For example, in FY 2017- 18, the amount for Tier 1 is expected to be the full 1% of GC 20516 contribution, but for Tier 2 (local miscellaneous) the amount is expected to be a 0.2% GC 20516 contribution. In addition, the contribution amounts will be based on the City Actuary’s review of most recent CalPERS Annual Valuation Report. For FY 17/18 the most recent Annual Valuation Report was as of June 30, 2015. Tier 3: Local Miscellaneous 2% @ 62 Local Miscellaneous unrepresented employees in Tier 3 shall be responsible for the full employee contribution which will be applied to the CalPERS employee contribution. There shall be no EPMC. PEPRA provides that equal sharing of the normal costs shall be the standard. To meet this standard, Tier 3 employees shall also make additional contributions on the employer’s side (GC 20516) (in up to 1% percent increments per fiscal year, as determined by the City’s actuary) to attain the equal cost sharing of normal costs standard. As of the approval of this Compensation Summary by City Council, no such contributions are expected the 2017-2018 Fiscal Year. 61 Page 33 of 37 To the extent permitted by Assembly Bill 340, known as the California Public Employees’ Pension Reform Act of 2013, the following is a summary of Tier 3 benefits: A. Three-Year Final Compensation B. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance C. Credit for Unused Sick Leave D. 4th Level 1959 Survivor Benefit. The monthly member cost for this benefit will be paid by the City. E. Military Service Credit as Prior Service F. Cost of Living Allowance (2%) G. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance Continuance H. Pre-Retirement Death Benefit for Spouse I. Retired Death Benefit $5,000 J. Prior Service Credit (Remainder of page intentionally left blank.) 62 Page 34 of 37 VI.UNCLASSIFIED HOURLY EMPLOYEES A. SALARY & WAGES 1. Salary Increase The minimum wage for all unclassified hourly employees will be set by the State of California or Federal Government, whichever is higher: Pay period including January 1, 2017: $10.50/hr Pay Period including January 1, 2018: $11.00/hr Pay Period including January 1, 2019: $12.00/hr Pay Period including January 1, 2020: $13.00/hr B. BENEFITS 1. Retirement a. UCHR employees are enrolled in the Public Agency Retirement System Alternate Retirement Systems (PARS-ARS) b. The City pays 3.75% of the employee’s salary into the employee’s PARS- ARS account. c. Each pay period 3.75% will be deducted from the employee’s salary and deposited to the employee’s PARS-ARS account. 2. Sick Leave Sick Leave shall accrue pursuant to the Health Workplace, Health Family Act of 2014 (AB 1522). (Remainder of page intentionally left blank.) 63 Page 35 of 37 ATTACHMENT 1 – GROUP MEMBERSHIP LISTING The following shows the classifications assigned to each group as of October 2015. A. EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT GROUP 1 City Manager (Contract) City Clerk (Contract) Assistant City Manager Chief of Police FA Executive Director Deputy City Manager Development Services Department Director Director of Economic Development Director of Engineering /City Engineer Director of Finance Director of Human Resources Director of Information Technology Services Director of Library Director of Public Works Director of Recreation Fire Chief Senior Assistant City Attorney (Contract) B. SENIOR MANAGEMENT GROUP 1 Administrative Services Manager Animal Care Facility Administrator Assistant City Attorney Assistant City Clerk Assistant Chief of Police Assistant Director of Development Services Assistant Director of Engineering Assistant Director of Finance Assistant Director of Human Resources Assistant Director of Public Works Assistant Director of Recreation Budget and Analysis Manager Building Official/Code Enforcement Manager FA Deputy Director-SD LECC FA Deputy Executive Director FA Director-SD LECC Deputy City Attorney III Deputy Fire Chief FA Director of SD LECC FA IVDC-LECC Executive Director FA Program Manager Finance and Purchasing Manager 64 Page 36 of 37 Housing Manager Human Resources Operations Manager Information Technology Manager Marketing and Communications Manager Performance and Organizational Development Manager Planning Manager Police Administrative Services Administrator Police Captain Purchasing Agent Risk Manager C. UNCLASSIFIED AND CONFIDENTIAL MIDDLE MANAGEMENT/PROFESSIONAL GROUP1 Benefits Manager MM-Confidential Chief of Staff MM-Unclassified Deputy City Attorney I Professional-Unclassified Deputy City Attorney II Professional-Unclassified Deputy City Clerk I Professional-Unclassified Deputy City Clerk II Professional-Unclassified FA Geospatial Intel Analyst Professional-Unclassified FA Financial Manager MM-Unclassified FA Microcomputer Specialist Professional-Unclassified FA Network Administrator I Professional-Unclassified FA Network Administrator II Professional-Unclassified FA Program Analyst Professional-Unclassified FA Program Assistant Supervisor Professional-Unclassified FA Public Private Partnership and Exercise Program Manager MM-Unclassified FA Information Security Program Manager MM-Unclassified FA LECC IT Manager MM-Unclassified FA Senior Financial Analyst Professional-Unclassified FA Senior Intelligence Analyst Professional-Unclassified FA Supervisory Intelligence Analyst Professional-Unclassified Fire Division Chief MM-Unclassified Fiscal and Management Analyst Professional-Confidential Fiscal Debt Management Analyst MM-Confidential Human Resources Analyst Professional-Confidential Law Office Manager MM-Unclassified Policy Aide Professional-Unclassified Principal Human Resources Analyst Professional-Confidential Principal Management Analyst Professional-Confidential Real Property Manager MM-Unclassified Risk Management Specialist Professional-Confidential Senior Accountant MM-Confidential Senior Deputy City Clerk Professional-Unclassified Senior Human Resources Analyst Professional-Confidential Senior Risk Management Specialist Professional-Confidential 65 Page 37 of 37 Special Events Coordinator Professional-Unclassified D. CONFIDENTIAL GROUP 1 Accountant Accounting Technician (Finance/Payroll) Administrative Secretary Administrative Secretary (Mayor’s Office/At-Will)Confidential-Unclassified Associate Accountant Constituent Services Representative Confidential-Unclassified Executive Secretary Confidential-Unclassified FA Accounting Technician Confidential-Unclassified FA Administrative Analyst I Confidential-Unclassified FA Administrative Analyst II Confidential-Unclassified FA Analyst Confidential-Unclassified FA Executive Assistant Confidential-Unclassified FA Graphic Designer/Webmaster Confidential-Unclassified FA Intelligence Analyst Confidential-Unclassified FA Management Assistant Confidential-Unclassified FA Program Assistant Confidential-Unclassified FA RCFL Network Engineer Confidential-Unclassified FA Senior Program Assistant FA Senior Secretary Confidential-Unclassified Human Resources Technician Legal Assistant Public Information Specialist Senior Council Assistant Confidential-Unclassified Senior Legal Assistant Senior Human Resources Technician Senior Legal Assistant 1 The City of Chula Vista serves as a pass through agency for the San Diego and Imperial Counties High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area (HIDTA); HIDTA positions (with the "CBAG" or "FA" designation) shall receive the benefit package detailed for the Executive, Senior, Middle Management/Professional Unclassified, and Confidential group in which the CBAG or FA classification is designated. All HIDTA positions are unclassified. 66 Fiscal  Year 2018‐2019 Compensation Schedule Effective August 17, 2018 POSITION TITLE PCN BARG STEP BI‐WEEKLY RATE* ACCOUNTANT 3633 CONF A $2,167.17 ACCOUNTANT 3633 CONF B $2,275.53 ACCOUNTANT 3633 CONF C $2,389.31 ACCOUNTANT 3633 CONF D $2,508.77 ACCOUNTANT 3633 CONF E $2,634.21 ACCOUNTING ASST 3641 ACE A $1,674.32 ACCOUNTING ASST 3641 ACE B $1,758.03 ACCOUNTING ASST 3641 ACE C $1,845.95 ACCOUNTING ASST 3641 ACE D $1,938.23 ACCOUNTING ASST 3641 ACE E $2,035.14 ACCOUNTING TECH 3643 CONF A $1,843.24 ACCOUNTING TECH 3643 CONF B $1,935.40 ACCOUNTING TECH 3643 CONF C $2,032.18 ACCOUNTING TECH 3643 CONF D $2,133.78 ACCOUNTING TECH 3643 CONF E $2,240.47 ACCOUNTING TECH 3675 ACE A $1,843.24 ACCOUNTING TECH 3675 ACE B $1,935.40 ACCOUNTING TECH 3675 ACE C $2,032.18 ACCOUNTING TECH 3675 ACE D $2,133.78 ACCOUNTING TECH 3675 ACE E $2,240.47 ACCTG TECH II (T) 3647 CONF A $2,118.02 ACCTG TECH II (T) 3647 CONF B $2,223.91 ACCTG TECH II (T) 3647 CONF C $2,335.11 ACCTG TECH II (T) 3647 CONF D $2,451.86 ACCTG TECH II (T) 3647 CONF E $2,574.46 ACCTG TECH II (T) 3677 ACE A $2,118.02 ACCTG TECH II (T) 3677 ACE B $2,223.91 ACCTG TECH II (T) 3677 ACE C $2,335.11 ACCTG TECH II (T) 3677 ACE D $2,451.86 ACCTG TECH II (T) 3677 ACE E $2,574.46 ACCTS PYBL SUPV 3645 ACE A $2,435.71 ACCTS PYBL SUPV 3645 ACE B $2,557.50 ACCTS PYBL SUPV 3645 ACE C $2,685.37 ACCTS PYBL SUPV 3645 ACE D $2,819.64 ACCTS PYBL SUPV 3645 ACE E $2,960.61 ADMIN SEC 0149 CONF A $2,069.08 ADMIN SEC 0149 CONF B $2,172.54 ADMIN SEC 0149 CONF C $2,281.16 ADMIN SEC 0149 CONF D $2,395.22 ADMIN SEC 0149 CONF E $2,514.98 All position titles designated as Executive (“EXEC”) or Senior Management (“SM”) have salary bands with a minimum (“Step A”) and  maximum (“Step E”) salary; salary appointments and subsequent adjustments within the approved salary range may be made by the  position’s appointing authority. Approved and Adopted:  Resolution No.:  * Bi‐weekly rate shown is based on an 80‐hour per pay period. 67 Fiscal  Year 2018‐2019 Compensation Schedule Effective August 17, 2018 POSITION TITLE PCN BARG STEP BI‐WEEKLY RATE* ADMIN SEC 0179 ACE A $2,069.08 ADMIN SEC 0179 ACE B $2,172.54 ADMIN SEC 0179 ACE C $2,281.16 ADMIN SEC 0179 ACE D $2,395.22 ADMIN SEC 0179 ACE E $2,514.98 ADMIN SEC‐MYR 0154 CONF A $2,069.08 ADMIN SEC‐MYR 0154 CONF B $2,172.54 ADMIN SEC‐MYR 0154 CONF C $2,281.16 ADMIN SEC‐MYR 0154 CONF D $2,395.22 ADMIN SEC‐MYR 0154 CONF E $2,514.98 ADMIN SVCS MGR 0215 SM A $3,711.61 ADMIN SVCS MGR 0215 SM B $0.00 ADMIN SVCS MGR 0215 SM C $0.00 ADMIN SVCS MGR 0215 SM D $0.00 ADMIN SVCS MGR 0215 SM E $4,511.49 ADMIN TECH 0147 CONF A $2,069.08 ADMIN TECH 0147 CONF B $2,172.54 ADMIN TECH 0147 CONF C $2,281.16 ADMIN TECH 0147 CONF D $2,395.22 ADMIN TECH 0147 CONF E $2,514.98 ADMIN TECH 0181 ACE A $2,069.08 ADMIN TECH 0181 ACE B $2,172.54 ADMIN TECH 0181 ACE C $2,281.16 ADMIN TECH 0181 ACE D $2,395.22 ADMIN TECH 0181 ACE E $2,514.98 ANIML ADPDTN CN 5310 ACE A $1,790.43 ANIML ADPDTN CN 5310 ACE B $1,879.94 ANIML ADPDTN CN 5310 ACE C $1,973.94 ANIML ADPDTN CN 5310 ACE D $2,072.63 ANIML ADPDTN CN 5310 ACE E $2,176.27 ANIML CR AIDE 5316 UCHR A $905.56 ANIML CR AIDE 5316 UCHR B $953.01 ANIML CR AIDE 5316 UCHR C $1,003.78 ANIML CR AIDE 5316 UCHR D $1,056.21 ANIML CR AIDE 5316 UCHR E $1,111.98 ANIML CR FC ADM 5327 SM A $4,324.58 ANIML CR FC ADM 5327 SM B $4,540.81 ANIML CR FC ADM 5327 SM C $4,767.84 ANIML CR FC ADM 5327 SM D $5,006.24 ANIML CR FC ADM 5327 SM E $5,256.55 ANIML CR SPEC 5343 ACE A $1,501.30 ANIML CR SPEC 5343 ACE B $1,576.36 ANIML CR SPEC 5343 ACE C $1,655.18 ANIML CR SPEC 5343 ACE D $1,737.95 ANIML CR SPEC 5343 ACE E $1,824.84 Approved and Adopted:  Resolution No.:  * Bi‐weekly rate shown is based on an 80‐hour per pay period. 68 Fiscal  Year 2018‐2019 Compensation Schedule Effective August 17, 2018 POSITION TITLE PCN BARG STEP BI‐WEEKLY RATE* ANIML CR SPEC 5344 UCHR A $1,501.30 ANIML CR SPEC 5344 UCHR B $1,576.37 ANIML CR SPEC 5344 UCHR C $1,655.18 ANIML CR SPEC 5344 UCHR D $1,737.95 ANIML CR SPEC 5344 UCHR E $1,824.85 ANIML CR SUPV 5319 ACE A $2,084.73 ANIML CR SUPV 5319 ACE B $2,188.96 ANIML CR SUPV 5319 ACE C $2,298.41 ANIML CR SUPV 5319 ACE D $2,413.33 ANIML CR SUPV 5319 ACE E $2,533.99 ANIML CT  OFF 5303 ACE A $1,801.55 ANIML CT  OFF 5303 ACE B $1,891.63 ANIML CT  OFF 5303 ACE C $1,986.22 ANIML CT  OFF 5303 ACE D $2,085.53 ANIML CT  OFF 5303 ACE E $2,189.81 ANIML CT  OFF 5305 UCHR A $1,801.56 ANIML CT  OFF 5305 UCHR B $1,891.63 ANIML CT  OFF 5305 UCHR C $1,986.22 ANIML CT  OFF 5305 UCHR D $2,085.54 ANIML CT  OFF 5305 UCHR E $2,189.80 ANIML CTL OF SP 5304 ACE A $2,071.79 ANIML CTL OF SP 5304 ACE B $2,175.37 ANIML CTL OF SP 5304 ACE C $2,284.15 ANIML CTL OF SP 5304 ACE D $2,398.35 ANIML CTL OF SP 5304 ACE E $2,518.28 ANIML SVCS SPEC 5309 ACE A $1,637.78 ANIML SVCS SPEC 5309 ACE B $1,719.68 ANIML SVCS SPEC 5309 ACE C $1,805.66 ANIML SVCS SPEC 5309 ACE D $1,895.94 ANIML SVCS SPEC 5309 ACE E $1,990.73 APPL SUPP MGR 3083 MM A $3,375.57 APPL SUPP MGR 3083 MM B $3,544.35 APPL SUPP MGR 3083 MM C $3,721.56 APPL SUPP MGR 3083 MM D $3,907.64 APPL SUPP MGR 3083 MM E $4,103.02 APPL SUPP SPEC 3088 PROF A $2,707.68 APPL SUPP SPEC 3088 PROF B $2,843.07 APPL SUPP SPEC 3088 PROF C $2,985.21 APPL SUPP SPEC 3088 PROF D $3,134.48 APPL SUPP SPEC 3088 PROF E $3,291.20 AQUARIST 7741 ACE A $1,864.88 AQUARIST 7741 ACE B $1,958.10 AQUARIST 7741 ACE C $2,056.01 AQUARIST 7741 ACE D $2,158.82 AQUARIST 7741 ACE E $2,266.76 Approved and Adopted:  Resolution No.:  * Bi‐weekly rate shown is based on an 80‐hour per pay period. 69 Fiscal  Year 2018‐2019 Compensation Schedule Effective August 17, 2018 POSITION TITLE PCN BARG STEP BI‐WEEKLY RATE* AQUATIC SUP I 7579 ACE A $1,912.58 AQUATIC SUP I 7579 ACE B $2,008.20 AQUATIC SUP I 7579 ACE C $2,108.62 AQUATIC SUP I 7579 ACE D $2,214.04 AQUATIC SUP I 7579 ACE E $2,324.74 AQUATIC SUP II 7577 ACE A $2,103.82 AQUATIC SUP II 7577 ACE B $2,209.01 AQUATIC SUP II 7577 ACE C $2,319.47 AQUATIC SUP II 7577 ACE D $2,435.44 AQUATIC SUP II 7577 ACE E $2,557.22 AQUATIC SUP III 7575 ACE A $2,419.41 AQUATIC SUP III 7575 ACE B $2,540.38 AQUATIC SUP III 7575 ACE C $2,667.40 AQUATIC SUP III 7575 ACE D $2,800.77 AQUATIC SUP III 7575 ACE E $2,940.81 ASSOC ACCT 3635 CONF A $2,383.89 ASSOC ACCT 3635 CONF B $2,503.09 ASSOC ACCT 3635 CONF C $2,628.24 ASSOC ACCT 3635 CONF D $2,759.65 ASSOC ACCT 3635 CONF E $2,897.64 ASSOC ACCT II (T) 3637 CONF A $2,737.26 ASSOC ACCT II (T) 3637 CONF B $2,874.12 ASSOC ACCT II (T) 3637 CONF C $3,017.82 ASSOC ACCT II (T) 3637 CONF D $3,168.72 ASSOC ACCT II (T) 3637 CONF E $3,327.15 ASSOC ENGINEER 6017 WCE A $3,296.66 ASSOC ENGINEER 6017 WCE B $3,461.49 ASSOC ENGINEER 6017 WCE C $3,634.58 ASSOC ENGINEER 6017 WCE D $3,816.30 ASSOC ENGINEER 6017 WCE E $4,007.11 ASSOC LND SRVYR 6287 WCE A $3,296.66 ASSOC LND SRVYR 6287 WCE B $3,461.49 ASSOC LND SRVYR 6287 WCE C $3,634.58 ASSOC LND SRVYR 6287 WCE D $3,816.30 ASSOC LND SRVYR 6287 WCE E $4,007.11 ASSOC PLANNER 4437 ACE A $2,714.05 ASSOC PLANNER 4437 ACE B $2,849.75 ASSOC PLANNER 4437 ACE C $2,992.24 ASSOC PLANNER 4437 ACE D $3,141.86 ASSOC PLANNER 4437 ACE E $3,298.95 ASSOC PLN CK EN 4747 WCE A $3,296.66 ASSOC PLN CK EN 4747 WCE B $3,461.49 ASSOC PLN CK EN 4747 WCE C $3,634.58 ASSOC PLN CK EN 4747 WCE D $3,816.30 ASSOC PLN CK EN 4747 WCE E $4,007.11 Approved and Adopted:  Resolution No.:  * Bi‐weekly rate shown is based on an 80‐hour per pay period. 70 Fiscal  Year 2018‐2019 Compensation Schedule Effective August 17, 2018 POSITION TITLE PCN BARG STEP BI‐WEEKLY RATE* ASST CHF OF POL 5011 SM A $5,364.74 ASST CHF OF POL 5011 SM B $0.00 ASST CHF OF POL 5011 SM C $0.00 ASST CHF OF POL 5011 SM D $0.00 ASST CHF OF POL 5011 SM E $6,520.87 ASST CITY ATTY 2405 SM A $5,727.96 ASST CITY ATTY 2405 SM B $6,014.38 ASST CITY ATTY 2405 SM C $6,315.09 ASST CITY ATTY 2405 SM D $6,627.32 ASST CITY ATTY 2405 SM E $6,962.38 ASST CITY CLERK 2210 SM A $3,260.66 ASST CITY CLERK 2210 SM B $3,423.70 ASST CITY CLERK 2210 SM C $3,594.88 ASST CITY CLERK 2210 SM D $3,774.61 ASST CITY CLERK 2210 SM E $3,963.44 ASST CITY MGR 2707 EXEC A $7,410.98 ASST CITY MGR 2707 EXEC B $0.00 ASST CITY MGR 2707 EXEC C $0.00 ASST CITY MGR 2707 EXEC D $0.00 ASST CITY MGR 2707 EXEC E $8,952.09 ASST DIR OF DS 4040 SM A $5,468.87 ASST DIR OF DS 4040 SM B $0.00 ASST DIR OF DS 4040 SM C $6,319.61 ASST DIR OF DS 4040 SM D $0.00 ASST DIR OF DS 4040 SM E $6,647.45 ASST DIR OF ENG 6008 SM A $5,250.14 ASST DIR OF ENG 6008 SM B $0.00 ASST DIR OF ENG 6008 SM C $0.00 ASST DIR OF ENG 6008 SM D $0.00 ASST DIR OF ENG 6008 SM E $6,338.44 ASST DIR OF FIN 3604 SM A $4,959.38 ASST DIR OF FIN 3604 SM B $0.00 ASST DIR OF FIN 3604 SM C $0.00 ASST DIR OF FIN 3604 SM D $0.00 ASST DIR OF FIN 3604 SM E $5,987.43 ASST DIR OF HR 3304 SM A $4,989.53 ASST DIR OF HR 3304 SM B $0.00 ASST DIR OF HR 3304 SM C $0.00 ASST DIR OF HR 3304 SM D $0.00 ASST DIR OF HR 3304 SM E $5,987.43 ASST DIR OF PW 6322 SM A $5,250.14 ASST DIR OF PW 6322 SM B $0.00 ASST DIR OF PW 6322 SM C $0.00 ASST DIR OF PW 6322 SM D $6,198.12 ASST DIR OF PW 6322 SM E $6,338.44 Approved and Adopted:  Resolution No.:  * Bi‐weekly rate shown is based on an 80‐hour per pay period. 71 Fiscal  Year 2018‐2019 Compensation Schedule Effective August 17, 2018 POSITION TITLE PCN BARG STEP BI‐WEEKLY RATE* ASST DIR OF REC 7401 SM A $4,096.76 ASST DIR OF REC 7401 SM B $0.00 ASST DIR OF REC 7401 SM C $0.00 ASST DIR OF REC 7401 SM D $0.00 ASST DIR OF REC 7401 SM E $4,979.64 ASST ENGINEER 6015 WCE A $2,866.67 ASST ENGINEER 6015 WCE B $3,010.00 ASST ENGINEER 6015 WCE C $3,160.51 ASST ENGINEER 6015 WCE D $3,318.53 ASST ENGINEER 6015 WCE E $3,484.45 ASST LND SRVYR 6289 WCE A $2,866.67 ASST LND SRVYR 6289 WCE B $3,010.00 ASST LND SRVYR 6289 WCE C $3,160.51 ASST LND SRVYR 6289 WCE D $3,318.53 ASST LND SRVYR 6289 WCE E $3,484.45 ASST PLANNER 4439 ACE A $2,467.33 ASST PLANNER 4439 ACE B $2,590.69 ASST PLANNER 4439 ACE C $2,720.23 ASST PLANNER 4439 ACE D $2,856.23 ASST PLANNER 4439 ACE E $2,999.04 ASST PLN CK ENG 4749 WCE A $2,866.67 ASST PLN CK ENG 4749 WCE B $3,010.00 ASST PLN CK ENG 4749 WCE C $3,160.51 ASST PLN CK ENG 4749 WCE D $3,318.53 ASST PLN CK ENG 4749 WCE E $3,484.45 AUTO FGRPT TECH 5123 ACE A $1,637.78 AUTO FGRPT TECH 5123 ACE B $1,719.68 AUTO FGRPT TECH 5123 ACE C $1,805.66 AUTO FGRPT TECH 5123 ACE D $1,895.94 AUTO FGRPT TECH 5123 ACE E $1,990.73 BENEFITS MGR 3404 MMCF A $3,586.13 BENEFITS MGR 3404 MMCF B $3,765.43 BENEFITS MGR 3404 MMCF C $3,953.71 BENEFITS MGR 3404 MMCF D $4,151.39 BENEFITS MGR 3404 MMCF E $4,358.96 BGT & ANLYS MGR 2222 SM A $4,223.08 BGT & ANLYS MGR 2222 SM B $4,434.23 BGT & ANLYS MGR 2222 SM C $4,687.62 BGT & ANLYS MGR 2222 SM D $0.00 BGT & ANLYS MGR 2222 SM E $5,133.18 BLDG INSP I 4771 ACE A $2,389.23 BLDG INSP I 4771 ACE B $2,508.69 BLDG INSP I 4771 ACE C $2,634.13 BLDG INSP I 4771 ACE D $2,765.83 BLDG INSP I 4771 ACE E $2,904.12 Approved and Adopted:  Resolution No.:  * Bi‐weekly rate shown is based on an 80‐hour per pay period. 72 Fiscal  Year 2018‐2019 Compensation Schedule Effective August 17, 2018 POSITION TITLE PCN BARG STEP BI‐WEEKLY RATE* BLDG INSP II 4773 ACE A $2,628.16 BLDG INSP II 4773 ACE B $2,759.57 BLDG INSP II 4773 ACE C $2,897.54 BLDG INSP II 4773 ACE D $3,042.43 BLDG INSP II 4773 ACE E $3,194.55 BLDG INSP III 4775 ACE A $2,890.97 BLDG INSP III 4775 ACE B $3,035.52 BLDG INSP III 4775 ACE C $3,187.30 BLDG INSP III 4775 ACE D $3,346.66 BLDG INSP III 4775 ACE E $3,513.99 BLDG INSP MGR 4769 MM A $3,373.84 BLDG INSP MGR 4769 MM B $3,542.54 BLDG INSP MGR 4769 MM C $3,719.66 BLDG INSP MGR 4769 MM D $3,905.65 BLDG INSP MGR 4769 MM E $4,100.93 BLDG OFF/CE MGR 4780 SM A $5,208.44 BLDG OFF/CE MGR 4780 SM B $0.00 BLDG OFF/CE MGR 4780 SM C $0.00 BLDG OFF/CE MGR 4780 SM D $0.00 BLDG OFF/CE MGR 4780 SM E $6,330.91 BLDG PROJ MGR 6412 PROF A $3,203.77 BLDG PROJ MGR 6412 PROF B $3,363.96 BLDG PROJ MGR 6412 PROF C $3,532.16 BLDG PROJ MGR 6412 PROF D $3,708.77 BLDG PROJ MGR 6412 PROF E $3,894.21 BLDG SVCS SUPV 6669 ACE A $2,310.02 BLDG SVCS SUPV 6669 ACE B $2,425.52 BLDG SVCS SUPV 6669 ACE C $2,546.80 BLDG SVCS SUPV 6669 ACE D $2,674.14 BLDG SVCS SUPV 6669 ACE E $2,807.85 BUSINSS LIC REP 4505 ACE A $1,674.32 BUSINSS LIC REP 4505 ACE B $1,758.03 BUSINSS LIC REP 4505 ACE C $1,845.95 BUSINSS LIC REP 4505 ACE D $1,938.23 BUSINSS LIC REP 4505 ACE E $2,035.14 C & R SUPVR 6427 ACE A $2,895.14 C & R SUPVR 6427 ACE B $3,039.91 C & R SUPVR 6427 ACE C $3,191.90 C & R SUPVR 6427 ACE D $3,351.49 C & R SUPVR 6427 ACE E $3,519.07 CARPENTER 6444 ACE A $2,084.89 CARPENTER 6444 ACE B $2,189.13 CARPENTER 6444 ACE C $2,298.59 CARPENTER 6444 ACE D $2,413.53 CARPENTER 6444 ACE E $2,534.21 Approved and Adopted:  Resolution No.:  * Bi‐weekly rate shown is based on an 80‐hour per pay period. 73 Fiscal  Year 2018‐2019 Compensation Schedule Effective August 17, 2018 POSITION TITLE PCN BARG STEP BI‐WEEKLY RATE* CASHIER 3669 ACE A $1,390.48 CASHIER 3669 ACE B $1,460.01 CASHIER 3669 ACE C $1,533.01 CASHIER 3669 ACE D $1,609.66 CASHIER 3669 ACE E $1,690.14 CHIEF OF POLICE 5001 EXEC A $7,009.65 CHIEF OF POLICE 5001 EXEC B $0.00 CHIEF OF POLICE 5001 EXEC C $8,103.12 CHIEF OF POLICE 5001 EXEC D $0.00 CHIEF OF POLICE 5001 EXEC E $8,520.29 CHIEF OF STAFF 2011 MMUC A $2,798.27 CHIEF OF STAFF 2011 MMUC B $2,938.18 CHIEF OF STAFF 2011 MMUC C $3,085.08 CHIEF OF STAFF 2011 MMUC D $3,239.34 CHIEF OF STAFF 2011 MMUC E $3,401.30 CHIEF SUST OFF 2729 SM A $4,959.39 CHIEF SUST OFF 2729 SM B $0.00 CHIEF SUST OFF 2729 SM C $0.00 CHIEF SUST OFF 2729 SM D $5,854.86 CHIEF SUST OFF 2729 SM E $5,987.43 CITY ATTY (EL) 2400 CATY A $0.00 CITY ATTY (EL) 2400 CATY B $0.00 CITY ATTY (EL) 2400 CATY C $0.00 CITY ATTY (EL) 2400 CATY D $0.00 CITY ATTY (EL) 2400 CATY E $7,369.70 CITY ATTY INV 2435 CONF A $2,461.89 CITY ATTY INV 2435 CONF B $2,584.98 CITY ATTY INV 2435 CONF C $2,714.23 CITY ATTY INV 2435 CONF D $2,849.94 CITY ATTY INV 2435 CONF E $2,992.44 CITY CLERK 2201 CCLK A $4,893.08 CITY CLERK 2201 CCLK B $0.00 CITY CLERK 2201 CCLK C $0.00 CITY CLERK 2201 CCLK D $5,100.00 CITY CLERK 2201 CCLK E $5,947.57 CITY ENGINEER 6010 SM A $4,994.79 CITY ENGINEER 6010 SM B $0.00 CITY ENGINEER 6010 SM C $0.00 CITY ENGINEER 6010 SM D $0.00 CITY ENGINEER 6010 SM E $6,071.19 CITY LIBRARIAN 7007 SM A $4,513.76 CITY LIBRARIAN 7007 SM B $4,739.44 CITY LIBRARIAN 7007 SM C $4,976.42 CITY LIBRARIAN 7007 SM D $5,225.24 CITY LIBRARIAN 7007 SM E $5,486.50 Approved and Adopted:  Resolution No.:  * Bi‐weekly rate shown is based on an 80‐hour per pay period. 74 Fiscal  Year 2018‐2019 Compensation Schedule Effective August 17, 2018 POSITION TITLE PCN BARG STEP BI‐WEEKLY RATE* CITY MANAGER 2710 CMGR A $0.00 CITY MANAGER 2710 CMGR B $0.00 CITY MANAGER 2710 CMGR C $0.00 CITY MANAGER 2710 CMGR D $0.00 CITY MANAGER 2710 CMGR E $11,180.77 CIVIL BKGRD INV 5429 ACE A $1,981.72 CIVIL BKGRD INV 5429 ACE B $2,080.79 CIVIL BKGRD INV 5429 ACE C $2,184.83 CIVIL BKGRD INV 5429 ACE D $2,294.07 CIVIL BKGRD INV 5429 ACE E $2,408.77 CIVIL BKGRD INV 5430 UCHR A $1,981.71 CIVIL BKGRD INV 5430 UCHR B $2,080.79 CIVIL BKGRD INV 5430 UCHR C $2,184.83 CIVIL BKGRD INV 5430 UCHR D $2,294.07 CIVIL BKGRD INV 5430 UCHR E $2,408.78 CIVIL POL INV 5431 UCHR A $2,063.15 CIVIL POL INV 5431 UCHR B $2,166.32 CIVIL POL INV 5431 UCHR C $2,274.63 CIVIL POL INV 5431 UCHR D $2,388.36 CIVIL POL INV 5431 UCHR E $2,507.78 CLERICAL AIDE 0241 UCHR A $880.00 CLERICAL AIDE 0241 UCHR B $885.84 CLERICAL AIDE 0241 UCHR C $930.14 CLERICAL AIDE 0241 UCHR D $976.64 CLERICAL AIDE 0241 UCHR E $1,025.47 CLT ARTS PM MGR 4435 PROF A $3,039.79 CLT ARTS PM MGR 4435 PROF B $3,191.78 CLT ARTS PM MGR 4435 PROF C $3,351.37 CLT ARTS PM MGR 4435 PROF D $3,518.91 CLT ARTS PM MGR 4435 PROF E $3,694.89 CODE ENF OFF I 4777 ACE A $2,075.30 CODE ENF OFF I 4777 ACE B $2,179.08 CODE ENF OFF I 4777 ACE C $2,288.02 CODE ENF OFF I 4777 ACE D $2,402.43 CODE ENF OFF I 4777 ACE E $2,522.55 CODE ENF OFF II 4778 UCHR A $2,282.83 CODE ENF OFF II 4778 UCHR B $2,396.98 CODE ENF OFF II 4778 UCHR C $2,516.84 CODE ENF OFF II 4778 UCHR D $2,642.66 CODE ENF OFF II 4778 UCHR E $2,774.82 CODE ENF OFF II 4779 ACE A $2,282.83 CODE ENF OFF II 4779 ACE B $2,396.98 CODE ENF OFF II 4779 ACE C $2,516.83 CODE ENF OFF II 4779 ACE D $2,642.67 CODE ENF OFF II 4779 ACE E $2,774.81 Approved and Adopted:  Resolution No.:  * Bi‐weekly rate shown is based on an 80‐hour per pay period. 75 Fiscal  Year 2018‐2019 Compensation Schedule Effective August 17, 2018 POSITION TITLE PCN BARG STEP BI‐WEEKLY RATE* CODE ENF TECH 4789 ACE A $1,804.61 CODE ENF TECH 4789 ACE B $1,894.85 CODE ENF TECH 4789 ACE C $1,989.59 CODE ENF TECH 4789 ACE D $2,089.07 CODE ENF TECH 4789 ACE E $2,193.52 COLLECTIONS SUP 3683 MM A $2,800.98 COLLECTIONS SUP 3683 MM B $2,941.04 COLLECTIONS SUP 3683 MM C $3,088.09 COLLECTIONS SUP 3683 MM D $3,242.49 COLLECTIONS SUP 3683 MM E $3,404.62 COMMTY SERV OFF 5141 ACE A $1,637.78 COMMTY SERV OFF 5141 ACE B $1,719.68 COMMTY SERV OFF 5141 ACE C $1,805.66 COMMTY SERV OFF 5141 ACE D $1,895.94 COMMTY SERV OFF 5141 ACE E $1,990.73 CONSTIT SRV REP 2039 CONF A $0.00 CONSTIT SRV REP 2039 CONF B $0.00 CONSTIT SRV REP 2039 CONF C $0.00 CONSTIT SRV REP 2039 CONF D $0.00 CONSTIT SRV REP 2039 CONF E $1,920.74 CONSVTN SPEC I 6200 ACE A $1,886.64 CONSVTN SPEC I 6200 ACE B $1,980.98 CONSVTN SPEC I 6200 ACE C $2,080.04 CONSVTN SPEC I 6200 ACE D $2,184.02 CONSVTN SPEC I 6200 ACE E $2,293.23 CONSVTN SPEC II 6202 ACE A $2,075.30 CONSVTN SPEC II 6202 ACE B $2,179.08 CONSVTN SPEC II 6202 ACE C $2,288.02 CONSVTN SPEC II 6202 ACE D $2,402.43 CONSVTN SPEC II 6202 ACE E $2,522.55 COUNCIL ASST 2023 UCHR A $1,832.86 COUNCIL ASST 2023 UCHR B $1,924.50 COUNCIL ASST 2023 UCHR C $2,020.73 COUNCIL ASST 2023 UCHR D $2,121.76 COUNCIL ASST 2023 UCHR E $2,227.85 COUNCILPERSON 2003 CL A $0.00 COUNCILPERSON 2003 CL B $0.00 COUNCILPERSON 2003 CL C $0.00 COUNCILPERSON 2003 CL D $0.00 COUNCILPERSON 2003 CL E $1,945.60 CRIME LAB MGR 5101 MM A $3,627.09 CRIME LAB MGR 5101 MM B $3,808.45 CRIME LAB MGR 5101 MM C $3,998.86 CRIME LAB MGR 5101 MM D $4,198.81 CRIME LAB MGR 5101 MM E $4,408.75 Approved and Adopted:  Resolution No.:  * Bi‐weekly rate shown is based on an 80‐hour per pay period. 76 Fiscal  Year 2018‐2019 Compensation Schedule Effective August 17, 2018 POSITION TITLE PCN BARG STEP BI‐WEEKLY RATE* CUSTODIAL SPVR 6667 ACE A $1,915.48 CUSTODIAL SPVR 6667 ACE B $2,011.26 CUSTODIAL SPVR 6667 ACE C $2,111.83 CUSTODIAL SPVR 6667 ACE D $2,217.42 CUSTODIAL SPVR 6667 ACE E $2,328.29 CUSTODIAN 6661 ACE A $1,514.21 CUSTODIAN 6661 ACE B $1,589.91 CUSTODIAN 6661 ACE C $1,669.41 CUSTODIAN 6661 ACE D $1,752.89 CUSTODIAN 6661 ACE E $1,840.53 CUSTODIAN 6662 UCHR A $1,514.21 CUSTODIAN 6662 UCHR B $1,589.92 CUSTODIAN 6662 UCHR C $1,669.42 CUSTODIAN 6662 UCHR D $1,752.89 CUSTODIAN 6662 UCHR E $1,840.54 DELIVERY DRIVER 7191 ACE A $1,388.03 DELIVERY DRIVER 7191 ACE B $1,457.44 DELIVERY DRIVER 7191 ACE C $1,530.31 DELIVERY DRIVER 7191 ACE D $1,606.83 DELIVERY DRIVER 7191 ACE E $1,687.16 DEP CTY ATY I 2410 PRUC A $3,356.44 DEP CTY ATY I 2410 PRUC B $3,524.27 DEP CTY ATY I 2410 PRUC C $3,700.48 DEP CTY ATY I 2410 PRUC D $3,885.51 DEP CTY ATY I 2410 PRUC E $4,079.79 DEP CTY ATY II 2408 PRUC A $4,027.74 DEP CTY ATY II 2408 PRUC B $4,229.12 DEP CTY ATY II 2408 PRUC C $4,440.58 DEP CTY ATY II 2408 PRUC D $4,662.60 DEP CTY ATY II 2408 PRUC E $4,895.73 DEP CTY ATY III 2411 SM A $5,156.22 DEP CTY ATY III 2411 SM B $5,414.04 DEP CTY ATY III 2411 SM C $5,684.74 DEP CTY ATY III 2411 SM D $5,968.97 DEP CTY ATY III 2411 SM E $6,267.39 DEP CTY CLK I 2245 PRUC A $2,075.54 DEP CTY CLK I 2245 PRUC B $2,179.31 DEP CTY CLK I 2245 PRUC C $2,288.28 DEP CTY CLK I 2245 PRUC D $2,402.69 DEP CTY CLK I 2245 PRUC E $2,522.83 DEP CTY CLK II 2243 PRUC A $2,283.10 DEP CTY CLK II 2243 PRUC B $2,397.26 DEP CTY CLK II 2243 PRUC C $2,517.12 DEP CTY CLK II 2243 PRUC D $2,642.97 DEP CTY CLK II 2243 PRUC E $2,775.12 Approved and Adopted:  Resolution No.:  * Bi‐weekly rate shown is based on an 80‐hour per pay period. 77 Fiscal  Year 2018‐2019 Compensation Schedule Effective August 17, 2018 POSITION TITLE PCN BARG STEP BI‐WEEKLY RATE* DEP CTY MGR 2705 EXEC A $7,727.96 DEP CTY MGR 2705 EXEC B $0.00 DEP CTY MGR 2705 EXEC C $0.00 DEP CTY MGR 2705 EXEC D $0.00 DEP CTY MGR 2705 EXEC E $8,559.53 DEP FIRE CHIEF 5505 SM A $5,333.58 DEP FIRE CHIEF 5505 SM B $0.00 DEP FIRE CHIEF 5505 SM C $0.00 DEP FIRE CHIEF 5505 SM D $0.00 DEP FIRE CHIEF 5505 SM E $6,483.02 DET FACILTY MGR 5130 MM A $3,627.09 DET FACILTY MGR 5130 MM B $3,808.45 DET FACILTY MGR 5130 MM C $3,998.86 DET FACILTY MGR 5130 MM D $4,198.81 DET FACILTY MGR 5130 MM E $4,408.75 DEV SRV CTR MGR 4547 MM A $3,498.91 DEV SRV CTR MGR 4547 MM B $3,673.85 DEV SRV CTR MGR 4547 MM C $3,857.54 DEV SRV CTR MGR 4547 MM D $4,050.42 DEV SRV CTR MGR 4547 MM E $4,252.94 DEV SRV TCH I 4542 ACE A $1,707.05 DEV SRV TCH I 4542 ACE B $1,792.41 DEV SRV TCH I 4542 ACE C $1,882.02 DEV SRV TCH I 4542 ACE D $1,976.13 DEV SRV TCH I 4542 ACE E $2,074.94 DEV SRV TCH I 4540 UCHR A $1,707.05 DEV SRV TCH I 4540 UCHR B $1,792.41 DEV SRV TCH I 4540 UCHR C $1,882.02 DEV SRV TCH I 4540 UCHR D $1,976.13 DEV SRV TCH I 4540 UCHR E $2,074.94 DEV SRV TCH II 4541 ACE A $1,877.76 DEV SRV TCH II 4541 ACE B $1,971.64 DEV SRV TCH II 4541 ACE C $2,070.22 DEV SRV TCH II 4541 ACE D $2,173.74 DEV SRV TCH II 4541 ACE E $2,282.42 DEV SRV TCH II 4544 UCHR A $1,877.75 DEV SRV TCH II 4544 UCHR B $1,971.64 DEV SRV TCH II 4544 UCHR C $2,070.22 DEV SRV TCH II 4544 UCHR D $2,173.74 DEV SRV TCH II 4544 UCHR E $2,282.42 DEV SRV TCH III 4543 ACE A $2,159.41 DEV SRV TCH III 4543 ACE B $2,267.39 DEV SRV TCH III 4543 ACE C $2,380.76 DEV SRV TCH III 4543 ACE D $2,499.79 DEV SRV TCH III 4543 ACE E $2,624.79 Approved and Adopted:  Resolution No.:  * Bi‐weekly rate shown is based on an 80‐hour per pay period. 78 Fiscal  Year 2018‐2019 Compensation Schedule Effective August 17, 2018 POSITION TITLE PCN BARG STEP BI‐WEEKLY RATE* DIR OF COM SVCS 7004 EXEC A $5,941.57 DIR OF COM SVCS 7004 EXEC B $0.00 DIR OF COM SVCS 7004 EXEC C $0.00 DIR OF COM SVCS 7004 EXEC D $0.00 DIR OF COM SVCS 7004 EXEC E $7,222.27 DIR OF DEV SVCS 4039 EXEC A $6,400.01 DIR OF DEV SVCS 4039 EXEC B $0.00 DIR OF DEV SVCS 4039 EXEC C $0.00 DIR OF DEV SVCS 4039 EXEC D $7,656.49 DIR OF DEV SVCS 4039 EXEC E $7,780.28 DIR OF ECON DEV 2734 EXEC A $6,400.01 DIR OF ECON DEV 2734 EXEC B $0.00 DIR OF ECON DEV 2734 EXEC C $0.00 DIR OF ECON DEV 2734 EXEC D $0.00 DIR OF ECON DEV 2734 EXEC E $7,780.28 DIR OF ENG/CE 6006 EXEC A $5,941.78 DIR OF ENG/CE 6006 EXEC B $0.00 DIR OF ENG/CE 6006 EXEC C $0.00 DIR OF ENG/CE 6006 EXEC D $0.00 DIR OF ENG/CE 6006 EXEC E $7,222.27 DIR OF FINANCE 3601 EXEC A $6,446.09 DIR OF FINANCE 3601 EXEC B $0.00 DIR OF FINANCE 3601 EXEC C $7,222.29 DIR OF FINANCE 3601 EXEC D $0.00 DIR OF FINANCE 3601 EXEC E $7,779.24 DIR OF HR 3303 EXEC A $5,941.57 DIR OF HR 3303 EXEC B $0.00 DIR OF HR 3303 EXEC C $0.00 DIR OF HR 3303 EXEC D $0.00 DIR OF HR 3303 EXEC E $7,222.26 DIR OF ITS 3001 EXEC A $5,941.58 DIR OF ITS 3001 EXEC B $0.00 DIR OF ITS 3001 EXEC C $6,550.58 DIR OF ITS 3001 EXEC D $0.00 DIR OF ITS 3001 EXEC E $7,222.26 DIR OF PW 6320 EXEC A $5,941.78 DIR OF PW 6320 EXEC B $0.00 DIR OF PW 6320 EXEC C $0.00 DIR OF PW 6320 EXEC D $0.00 DIR OF PW 6320 EXEC E $7,222.27 ECON DEV SPC I 2747 ACE A $2,261.71 ECON DEV SPC I 2747 ACE B $2,374.79 ECON DEV SPC I 2747 ACE C $2,493.53 ECON DEV SPC I 2747 ACE D $2,618.21 ECON DEV SPC I 2747 ACE E $2,749.12 Approved and Adopted:  Resolution No.:  * Bi‐weekly rate shown is based on an 80‐hour per pay period. 79 Fiscal  Year 2018‐2019 Compensation Schedule Effective August 17, 2018 POSITION TITLE PCN BARG STEP BI‐WEEKLY RATE* ECON DEV SPC II 2749 ACE A $2,714.05 ECON DEV SPC II 2749 ACE B $2,849.75 ECON DEV SPC II 2749 ACE C $2,992.24 ECON DEV SPC II 2749 ACE D $3,141.86 ECON DEV SPC II 2749 ACE E $3,298.95 ELEC TECH 6475 ACE A $2,408.12 ELEC TECH 6475 ACE B $2,528.52 ELEC TECH 6475 ACE C $2,654.95 ELEC TECH 6475 ACE D $2,787.69 ELEC TECH 6475 ACE E $2,927.08 ELEC TECH SUPV 6472 ACE A $2,769.33 ELEC TECH SUPV 6472 ACE B $2,907.80 ELEC TECH SUPV 6472 ACE C $3,053.19 ELEC TECH SUPV 6472 ACE D $3,205.85 ELEC TECH SUPV 6472 ACE E $3,366.13 ELEC/EQUIP INST 6492 ACE A $1,990.14 ELEC/EQUIP INST 6492 ACE B $2,089.64 ELEC/EQUIP INST 6492 ACE C $2,194.12 ELEC/EQUIP INST 6492 ACE D $2,303.83 ELEC/EQUIP INST 6492 ACE E $2,419.02 ELECTRICIAN 6438 ACE A $2,189.14 ELECTRICIAN 6438 ACE B $2,298.60 ELECTRICIAN 6438 ACE C $2,413.54 ELECTRICIAN 6438 ACE D $2,534.22 ELECTRICIAN 6438 ACE E $2,660.91 EMRG SVCS COORD 5564 PROF A $3,022.47 EMRG SVCS COORD 5564 PROF B $3,173.60 EMRG SVCS COORD 5564 PROF C $3,332.28 EMRG SVCS COORD 5564 PROF D $3,498.90 EMRG SVCS COORD 5564 PROF E $3,673.84 EMS NURSE COORD 5567 PROF A $3,823.07 EMS NURSE COORD 5567 PROF B $4,014.22 EMS NURSE COORD 5567 PROF C $4,214.94 EMS NURSE COORD 5567 PROF D $4,425.69 EMS NURSE COORD 5567 PROF E $4,646.97 ENG TECH I 6081 ACE A $2,077.60 ENG TECH I 6081 ACE B $2,181.47 ENG TECH I 6081 ACE C $2,290.54 ENG TECH I 6081 ACE D $2,405.07 ENG TECH I 6081 ACE E $2,525.33 Approved and Adopted:  Resolution No.:  * Bi‐weekly rate shown is based on an 80‐hour per pay period. 80 Fiscal  Year 2018‐2019 Compensation Schedule Effective August 17, 2018 POSITION TITLE PCN BARG STEP BI‐WEEKLY RATE* ENG TECH II 6071 ACE A $2,285.35 ENG TECH II 6071 ACE B $2,399.62 ENG TECH II 6071 ACE C $2,519.60 ENG TECH II 6071 ACE D $2,645.58 ENG TECH II 6071 ACE E $2,777.86 ENV SUST MGR 6207 MM A $3,800.10 ENV SUST MGR 6207 MM B $3,990.11 ENV SUST MGR 6207 MM C $4,189.61 ENV SUST MGR 6207 MM D $4,399.09 ENV SUST MGR 6207 MM E $4,619.04 ENV SVCS MGR 6205 MM A $3,800.10 ENV SVCS MGR 6205 MM B $3,990.11 ENV SVCS MGR 6205 MM C $4,189.61 ENV SVCS MGR 6205 MM D $4,399.09 ENV SVCS MGR 6205 MM E $4,619.04 EQUIP MAINT MGR 6505 MM A $2,993.63 EQUIP MAINT MGR 6505 MM B $3,143.31 EQUIP MAINT MGR 6505 MM C $3,300.48 EQUIP MAINT MGR 6505 MM D $3,465.50 EQUIP MAINT MGR 6505 MM E $3,638.78 EQUIP MECH 6542 ACE A $2,065.79 EQUIP MECH 6542 ACE B $2,169.07 EQUIP MECH 6542 ACE C $2,277.52 EQUIP MECH 6542 ACE D $2,391.41 EQUIP MECH 6542 ACE E $2,510.97 EQUIP OPERATOR 6361 ACE A $2,198.64 EQUIP OPERATOR 6361 ACE B $2,308.57 EQUIP OPERATOR 6361 ACE C $2,424.00 EQUIP OPERATOR 6361 ACE D $2,545.20 EQUIP OPERATOR 6361 ACE E $2,672.45 EXEC SECRETARY 0187 CONF A $2,503.60 EXEC SECRETARY 0187 CONF B $2,628.77 EXEC SECRETARY 0187 CONF C $2,760.21 EXEC SECRETARY 0187 CONF D $2,898.22 EXEC SECRETARY 0187 CONF E $3,043.13 FA ACCTG TECH 5270 CONF A $2,118.02 FA ACCTG TECH 5270 CONF B $2,223.91 FA ACCTG TECH 5270 CONF C $2,335.11 FA ACCTG TECH 5270 CONF D $2,451.86 FA ACCTG TECH 5270 CONF E $2,574.46 FA ADM ANLYT I 5297 CONF A $2,326.33 FA ADM ANLYT I 5297 CONF B $2,442.67 FA ADM ANLYT I 5297 CONF C $2,564.78 FA ADM ANLYT I 5297 CONF D $2,693.02 FA ADM ANLYT I 5297 CONF E $2,827.67 Approved and Adopted:  Resolution No.:  * Bi‐weekly rate shown is based on an 80‐hour per pay period. 81 Fiscal  Year 2018‐2019 Compensation Schedule Effective August 17, 2018 POSITION TITLE PCN BARG STEP BI‐WEEKLY RATE* FA ADM ANLYT II 5296 CONF A $2,558.97 FA ADM ANLYT II 5296 CONF B $2,686.91 FA ADM ANLYT II 5296 CONF C $2,821.26 FA ADM ANLYT II 5296 CONF D $2,962.34 FA ADM ANLYT II 5296 CONF E $3,110.44 FA ANALYST 5277 CONF A $1,777.71 FA ANALYST 5277 CONF B $1,866.59 FA ANALYST 5277 CONF C $1,959.93 FA ANALYST 5277 CONF D $2,057.92 FA ANALYST 5277 CONF E $2,160.82 FA DEP DIR LECC 5465 SM A $3,827.71 FA DEP DIR LECC 5465 SM B $4,019.10 FA DEP DIR LECC 5465 SM C $4,220.05 FA DEP DIR LECC 5465 SM D $4,431.05 FA DEP DIR LECC 5465 SM E $4,652.62 FA DEP EXEC DIR 5463 SM A $4,098.48 FA DEP EXEC DIR 5463 SM B $0.00 FA DEP EXEC DIR 5463 SM C $0.00 FA DEP EXEC DIR 5463 SM D $0.00 FA DEP EXEC DIR 5463 SM E $4,981.73 FA DIR OF LECC 5274 SM A $4,820.88 FA DIR OF LECC 5274 SM B $0.00 FA DIR OF LECC 5274 SM C $0.00 FA DIR OF LECC 5274 SM D $0.00 FA DIR OF LECC 5274 SM E $5,859.81 FA EXEC ASST 5286 CONF A $2,277.57 FA EXEC ASST 5286 CONF B $2,391.45 FA EXEC ASST 5286 CONF C $2,511.03 FA EXEC ASST 5286 CONF D $2,636.57 FA EXEC ASST 5286 CONF E $2,768.41 FA EXEC DIR 5461 EXEC A $4,815.34 FA EXEC DIR 5461 EXEC B $0.00 FA EXEC DIR 5461 EXEC C $0.00 FA EXEC DIR 5461 EXEC D $0.00 FA EXEC DIR 5461 EXEC E $5,853.08 FA FIN MGR 5493 MMUC A $3,706.21 FA FIN MGR 5493 MMUC B $3,891.52 FA FIN MGR 5493 MMUC C $4,086.10 FA FIN MGR 5493 MMUC D $4,290.41 FA FIN MGR 5493 MMUC E $4,504.92 FA GD/WEBMASTER 5289 CONF A $2,406.41 FA GD/WEBMASTER 5289 CONF B $2,526.74 FA GD/WEBMASTER 5289 CONF C $2,653.08 FA GD/WEBMASTER 5289 CONF D $2,785.73 FA GD/WEBMASTER 5289 CONF E $2,925.02 Approved and Adopted:  Resolution No.:  * Bi‐weekly rate shown is based on an 80‐hour per pay period. 82 Fiscal  Year 2018‐2019 Compensation Schedule Effective August 17, 2018 POSITION TITLE PCN BARG STEP BI‐WEEKLY RATE* FA GS INTL ANYT 5439 PRUC A $3,216.70 FA GS INTL ANYT 5439 PRUC B $3,377.54 FA GS INTL ANYT 5439 PRUC C $3,546.41 FA GS INTL ANYT 5439 PRUC D $3,723.73 FA GS INTL ANYT 5439 PRUC E $3,909.92 FA INTEL ANLYT 5485 CONF A $2,406.41 FA INTEL ANLYT 5485 CONF B $2,526.74 FA INTEL ANLYT 5485 CONF C $2,653.08 FA INTEL ANLYT 5485 CONF D $2,785.73 FA INTEL ANLYT 5485 CONF E $2,925.02 FA IS PGM MGR 5453 MMUC A $3,752.29 FA IS PGM MGR 5453 MMUC B $3,939.91 FA IS PGM MGR 5453 MMUC C $4,136.91 FA IS PGM MGR 5453 MMUC D $4,343.75 FA IS PGM MGR 5453 MMUC E $4,560.94 FA IVLECC EXDIR 5491 SM A $4,162.91 FA IVLECC EXDIR 5491 SM B $4,371.04 FA IVLECC EXDIR 5491 SM C $4,589.59 FA IVLECC EXDIR 5491 SM D $4,819.06 FA IVLECC EXDIR 5491 SM E $5,060.02 FA LECC IT MGR 5440 MMUC A $3,431.15 FA LECC IT MGR 5440 MMUC B $3,602.70 FA LECC IT MGR 5440 MMUC C $3,782.83 FA LECC IT MGR 5440 MMUC D $3,971.98 FA LECC IT MGR 5440 MMUC E $4,170.58 FA MCROCMP SPEC 5443 PRUC A $2,789.73 FA MCROCMP SPEC 5443 PRUC B $2,929.22 FA MCROCMP SPEC 5443 PRUC C $3,075.68 FA MCROCMP SPEC 5443 PRUC D $3,229.46 FA MCROCMP SPEC 5443 PRUC E $3,390.94 FA MGMT ASST 5278 CONF A $2,169.12 FA MGMT ASST 5278 CONF B $2,277.57 FA MGMT ASST 5278 CONF C $2,391.46 FA MGMT ASST 5278 CONF D $2,511.04 FA MGMT ASST 5278 CONF E $2,636.58 FA NTWK ADMN I 5292 PRUC A $2,807.55 FA NTWK ADMN I 5292 PRUC B $2,947.93 FA NTWK ADMN I 5292 PRUC C $3,095.32 FA NTWK ADMN I 5292 PRUC D $3,250.09 FA NTWK ADMN I 5292 PRUC E $3,412.59 FA NTWK ADMN II 5294 PRUC A $3,088.31 FA NTWK ADMN II 5294 PRUC B $3,242.72 FA NTWK ADMN II 5294 PRUC C $3,404.86 FA NTWK ADMN II 5294 PRUC D $3,575.10 FA NTWK ADMN II 5294 PRUC E $3,753.86 Approved and Adopted:  Resolution No.:  * Bi‐weekly rate shown is based on an 80‐hour per pay period. 83 Fiscal  Year 2018‐2019 Compensation Schedule Effective August 17, 2018 POSITION TITLE PCN BARG STEP BI‐WEEKLY RATE* FA PGM ANALYST 5444 PRUC A $3,328.24 FA PGM ANALYST 5444 PRUC B $3,494.65 FA PGM ANALYST 5444 PRUC C $3,669.39 FA PGM ANALYST 5444 PRUC D $3,852.86 FA PGM ANALYST 5444 PRUC E $4,045.50 FA PGM ASST 5451 CONF A $1,732.73 FA PGM ASST 5451 CONF B $1,819.35 FA PGM ASST 5451 CONF C $1,910.33 FA PGM ASST 5451 CONF D $2,005.85 FA PGM ASST 5451 CONF E $2,106.14 FA PGM ASST SUP 5452 PRUC A $2,420.64 FA PGM ASST SUP 5452 PRUC B $2,541.68 FA PGM ASST SUP 5452 PRUC C $2,668.77 FA PGM ASST SUP 5452 PRUC D $2,802.21 FA PGM ASST SUP 5452 PRUC E $2,942.31 FA PGM MGR 5445 SM A $3,827.71 FA PGM MGR 5445 SM B $4,024.31 FA PGM MGR 5445 SM C $4,220.05 FA PGM MGR 5445 SM D $4,431.05 FA PGM MGR 5445 SM E $4,652.62 FA PPPE PGM MGR 5497 MMUC A $3,489.59 FA PPPE PGM MGR 5497 MMUC B $3,664.07 FA PPPE PGM MGR 5497 MMUC C $3,847.28 FA PPPE PGM MGR 5497 MMUC D $4,039.65 FA PPPE PGM MGR 5497 MMUC E $4,241.63 FA RCFL NWK ENG 5284 CONF A $2,792.58 FA RCFL NWK ENG 5284 CONF B $2,932.20 FA RCFL NWK ENG 5284 CONF C $3,078.82 FA RCFL NWK ENG 5284 CONF D $3,232.75 FA RCFL NWK ENG 5284 CONF E $3,394.39 FA SPV INT ANLT 5481 PRUC A $3,021.32 FA SPV INT ANLT 5481 PRUC B $3,172.38 FA SPV INT ANLT 5481 PRUC C $3,331.00 FA SPV INT ANLT 5481 PRUC D $3,497.56 FA SPV INT ANLT 5481 PRUC E $3,672.44 FA SR FIN ANLYT 5495 PRUC A $2,608.16 FA SR FIN ANLYT 5495 PRUC B $2,738.57 FA SR FIN ANLYT 5495 PRUC C $2,875.49 FA SR FIN ANLYT 5495 PRUC D $3,019.27 FA SR FIN ANLYT 5495 PRUC E $3,170.23 FA SR INTL ANLT 5483 PRUC A $2,746.66 FA SR INTL ANLT 5483 PRUC B $2,883.99 FA SR INTL ANLT 5483 PRUC C $3,028.20 FA SR INTL ANLT 5483 PRUC D $3,179.61 FA SR INTL ANLT 5483 PRUC E $3,338.58 Approved and Adopted:  Resolution No.:  * Bi‐weekly rate shown is based on an 80‐hour per pay period. 84 Fiscal  Year 2018‐2019 Compensation Schedule Effective August 17, 2018 POSITION TITLE PCN BARG STEP BI‐WEEKLY RATE* FA SR PGM ASST 5454 CONF A $2,061.50 FA SR PGM ASST 5454 CONF B $2,164.57 FA SR PGM ASST 5454 CONF C $2,272.80 FA SR PGM ASST 5454 CONF D $2,386.45 FA SR PGM ASST 5454 CONF E $2,505.77 FA SR SECRETARY 5477 CONF A $1,782.48 FA SR SECRETARY 5477 CONF B $1,871.60 FA SR SECRETARY 5477 CONF C $1,965.18 FA SR SECRETARY 5477 CONF D $2,063.44 FA SR SECRETARY 5477 CONF E $2,166.61 FAC & SUPP SPEC 5646 UCHR A $1,780.04 FAC & SUPP SPEC 5646 UCHR B $1,869.05 FAC & SUPP SPEC 5646 UCHR C $1,962.50 FAC & SUPP SPEC 5646 UCHR D $2,060.62 FAC & SUPP SPEC 5646 UCHR E $2,163.65 FAC & SUPP SPEC 5648 ACE A $1,780.04 FAC & SUPP SPEC 5648 ACE B $1,869.05 FAC & SUPP SPEC 5648 ACE C $1,962.50 FAC & SUPP SPEC 5648 ACE D $2,060.61 FAC & SUPP SPEC 5648 ACE E $2,163.64 FACILITIES MGR 6425 MM A $3,409.71 FACILITIES MGR 6425 MM B $3,580.19 FACILITIES MGR 6425 MM C $3,759.20 FACILITIES MGR 6425 MM D $3,947.16 FACILITIES MGR 6425 MM E $4,144.52 FIELD MAIN SPEC 7471 ACE A $1,618.23 FIELD MAIN SPEC 7471 ACE B $1,699.14 FIELD MAIN SPEC 7471 ACE C $1,784.10 FIELD MAIN SPEC 7471 ACE D $1,873.30 FIELD MAIN SPEC 7471 ACE E $1,966.96 FIN & PURCH MGR 3625 SM A $4,609.77 FIN & PURCH MGR 3625 SM B $0.00 FIN & PURCH MGR 3625 SM C $0.00 FIN & PURCH MGR 3625 SM D $0.00 FIN & PURCH MGR 3625 SM E $5,603.20 FIRE APP MECH 6521 ACE A $2,477.65 FIRE APP MECH 6521 ACE B $2,601.54 FIRE APP MECH 6521 ACE C $2,731.61 FIRE APP MECH 6521 ACE D $2,868.20 FIRE APP MECH 6521 ACE E $3,011.60 FIRE BC‐112HR 5511 IAFF A $4,146.44 FIRE BC‐112HR 5511 IAFF B $4,353.74 FIRE BC‐112HR 5511 IAFF C $4,571.44 FIRE BC‐112HR 5511 IAFF D $4,800.02 FIRE BC‐112HR 5511 IAFF E $5,040.01 Approved and Adopted:  Resolution No.:  * Bi‐weekly rate shown is based on an 80‐hour per pay period. 85 Fiscal  Year 2018‐2019 Compensation Schedule Effective August 17, 2018 POSITION TITLE PCN BARG STEP BI‐WEEKLY RATE* FIRE BC‐80HR 5513 IAFF A $4,146.43 FIRE BC‐80HR 5513 IAFF B $4,353.75 FIRE BC‐80HR 5513 IAFF C $4,571.44 FIRE BC‐80HR 5513 IAFF D $4,800.01 FIRE BC‐80HR 5513 IAFF E $5,040.01 FIRE CAPT‐112HR 5583 IAFF A $3,328.40 FIRE CAPT‐112HR 5583 IAFF B $3,494.84 FIRE CAPT‐112HR 5583 IAFF C $3,669.57 FIRE CAPT‐112HR 5583 IAFF D $3,853.05 FIRE CAPT‐112HR 5583 IAFF E $4,045.70 FIRE CAPT‐80HR 5581 IAFF A $3,328.41 FIRE CAPT‐80HR 5581 IAFF B $3,494.83 FIRE CAPT‐80HR 5581 IAFF C $3,669.57 FIRE CAPT‐80HR 5581 IAFF D $3,853.05 FIRE CAPT‐80HR 5581 IAFF E $4,045.71 FIRE CAPT‐INT 5580 IAFF A $3,328.40 FIRE CAPT‐INT 5580 IAFF B $3,494.84 FIRE CAPT‐INT 5580 IAFF C $3,669.57 FIRE CAPT‐INT 5580 IAFF D $3,853.05 FIRE CAPT‐INT 5580 IAFF E $4,045.70 FIRE CHIEF 5501 EXEC A $6,400.30 FIRE CHIEF 5501 EXEC B $0.00 FIRE CHIEF 5501 EXEC C $7,586.51 FIRE CHIEF 5501 EXEC D $0.00 FIRE CHIEF 5501 EXEC E $7,779.26 FIRE DIV CHIEF 5507 MMUC A $4,607.73 FIRE DIV CHIEF 5507 MMUC B $4,838.12 FIRE DIV CHIEF 5507 MMUC C $5,080.02 FIRE DIV CHIEF 5507 MMUC D $5,334.02 FIRE DIV CHIEF 5507 MMUC E $5,600.72 FIRE ENG‐112HR 5603 IAFF A $2,837.88 FIRE ENG‐112HR 5603 IAFF B $2,979.76 FIRE ENG‐112HR 5603 IAFF C $3,128.74 FIRE ENG‐112HR 5603 IAFF D $3,285.18 FIRE ENG‐112HR 5603 IAFF E $3,449.45 FIRE ENG‐80HR 5601 IAFF A $2,837.88 FIRE ENG‐80HR 5601 IAFF B $2,979.76 FIRE ENG‐80HR 5601 IAFF C $3,128.75 FIRE ENG‐80HR 5601 IAFF D $3,285.19 FIRE ENG‐80HR 5601 IAFF E $3,449.45 FIRE ENG‐INT 5602 IAFF A $2,837.88 FIRE ENG‐INT 5602 IAFF B $2,979.76 FIRE ENG‐INT 5602 IAFF C $3,128.74 FIRE ENG‐INT 5602 IAFF D $3,285.18 FIRE ENG‐INT 5602 IAFF E $3,449.45 Approved and Adopted:  Resolution No.:  * Bi‐weekly rate shown is based on an 80‐hour per pay period. 86 Fiscal  Year 2018‐2019 Compensation Schedule Effective August 17, 2018 POSITION TITLE PCN BARG STEP BI‐WEEKLY RATE* FIRE INS/INV I 5530 IAFF A $2,400.07 FIRE INS/INV I 5530 IAFF B $2,520.08 FIRE INS/INV I 5530 IAFF C $2,646.07 FIRE INS/INV I 5530 IAFF D $2,778.38 FIRE INS/INV I 5530 IAFF E $2,917.30 FIRE INS/INV I 5534 UCHR A $2,400.06 FIRE INS/INV I 5534 UCHR B $2,520.07 FIRE INS/INV I 5534 UCHR C $2,646.06 FIRE INS/INV I 5534 UCHR D $2,778.38 FIRE INS/INV I 5534 UCHR E $2,917.30 FIRE INS/INV II 5531 IAFF A $2,640.06 FIRE INS/INV II 5531 IAFF B $2,772.07 FIRE INS/INV II 5531 IAFF C $2,910.67 FIRE INS/INV II 5531 IAFF D $3,056.20 FIRE INS/INV II 5531 IAFF E $3,209.02 FIRE INS/INV II 5532 UCHR A $2,640.06 FIRE INS/INV II 5532 UCHR B $2,772.07 FIRE INS/INV II 5532 UCHR C $2,910.67 FIRE INS/INV II 5532 UCHR D $3,056.21 FIRE INS/INV II 5532 UCHR E $3,209.02 FIRE PRV AIDE 5533 UCHR A $1,162.66 FIRE PRV AIDE 5533 UCHR B $1,220.79 FIRE PRV AIDE 5533 UCHR C $1,281.84 FIRE PRV AIDE 5533 UCHR D $1,345.93 FIRE PRV AIDE 5533 UCHR E $1,413.22 FIRE PRV AIDE 5535 ACE A $1,174.29 FIRE PRV AIDE 5535 ACE B $1,233.00 FIRE PRV AIDE 5535 ACE C $1,294.66 FIRE PRV AIDE 5535 ACE D $1,359.38 FIRE PRV AIDE 5535 ACE E $1,427.35 FIRE PRV ENG/IN 5528 IAFF A $3,184.24 FIRE PRV ENG/IN 5528 IAFF B $3,343.46 FIRE PRV ENG/IN 5528 IAFF C $3,510.63 FIRE PRV ENG/IN 5528 IAFF D $3,686.16 FIRE PRV ENG/IN 5528 IAFF E $3,870.46 FIRE RECRUIT 5625 ACE A $1,865.24 FIRE RECRUIT 5625 ACE B $1,958.50 FIREFGHTR‐112HR 5623 IAFF A $2,411.89 FIREFGHTR‐112HR 5623 IAFF B $2,532.49 FIREFGHTR‐112HR 5623 IAFF C $2,659.10 FIREFGHTR‐112HR 5623 IAFF D $2,792.07 FIREFGHTR‐112HR 5623 IAFF E $2,931.66 Approved and Adopted:  Resolution No.:  * Bi‐weekly rate shown is based on an 80‐hour per pay period. 87 Fiscal  Year 2018‐2019 Compensation Schedule Effective August 17, 2018 POSITION TITLE PCN BARG STEP BI‐WEEKLY RATE* FIREFGHTR‐80HR 5621 IAFF A $2,411.89 FIREFGHTR‐80HR 5621 IAFF B $2,532.49 FIREFGHTR‐80HR 5621 IAFF C $2,659.11 FIREFGHTR‐80HR 5621 IAFF D $2,792.07 FIREFGHTR‐80HR 5621 IAFF E $2,931.66 FIREFGHTRPM‐112 5613 IAFF A $2,773.67 FIREFGHTRPM‐112 5613 IAFF B $2,912.35 FIREFGHTRPM‐112 5613 IAFF C $3,057.97 FIREFGHTRPM‐112 5613 IAFF D $3,210.86 FIREFGHTRPM‐112 5613 IAFF E $3,371.41 FIREFGHTRPM‐80 5611 IAFF A $2,773.67 FIREFGHTRPM‐80 5611 IAFF B $2,912.35 FIREFGHTRPM‐80 5611 IAFF C $3,057.97 FIREFGHTRPM‐80 5611 IAFF D $3,210.86 FIREFGHTRPM‐80 5611 IAFF E $3,371.41 FISC DBT MGT AN 3627 MMCF A $3,437.19 FISC DBT MGT AN 3627 MMCF B $3,609.05 FISC DBT MGT AN 3627 MMCF C $3,789.50 FISC DBT MGT AN 3627 MMCF D $3,978.98 FISC DBT MGT AN 3627 MMCF E $4,177.92 FISC OFF SPEC 0169 ACE A $1,546.78 FISC OFF SPEC 0169 ACE B $1,624.13 FISC OFF SPEC 0169 ACE C $1,705.33 FISC OFF SPEC 0169 ACE D $1,790.59 FISC OFF SPEC 0169 ACE E $1,880.12 FISC OFF SPEC 0170 UCHR A $1,546.78 FISC OFF SPEC 0170 UCHR B $1,624.14 FISC OFF SPEC 0170 UCHR C $1,705.34 FISC OFF SPEC 0170 UCHR D $1,790.60 FISC OFF SPEC 0170 UCHR E $1,880.12 FISC&MGT ANLYT 0216 PRCF A $3,437.19 FISC&MGT ANLYT 0216 PRCF B $3,609.05 FISC&MGT ANLYT 0216 PRCF C $3,789.50 FISC&MGT ANLYT 0216 PRCF D $3,978.98 FISC&MGT ANLYT 0216 PRCF E $4,177.92 FLT INV CTRL SP 6513 ACE A $2,047.05 FLT INV CTRL SP 6513 ACE B $2,149.40 FLT INV CTRL SP 6513 ACE C $2,256.86 FLT INV CTRL SP 6513 ACE D $2,369.70 FLT INV CTRL SP 6513 ACE E $2,488.20 FLT MANAGER 6501 MM A $3,325.60 FLT MANAGER 6501 MM B $3,491.88 FLT MANAGER 6501 MM C $3,666.47 FLT MANAGER 6501 MM D $3,849.80 FLT MANAGER 6501 MM E $4,042.29 Approved and Adopted:  Resolution No.:  * Bi‐weekly rate shown is based on an 80‐hour per pay period. 88 Fiscal  Year 2018‐2019 Compensation Schedule Effective August 17, 2018 POSITION TITLE PCN BARG STEP BI‐WEEKLY RATE* FORENSICS SPEC 5114 ACE A $2,452.96 FORENSICS SPEC 5114 ACE B $2,575.61 FORENSICS SPEC 5114 ACE C $2,704.41 FORENSICS SPEC 5114 ACE D $2,839.62 FORENSICS SPEC 5114 ACE E $2,981.60 GARDENER (SEAS) 6629 UCHR A $1,455.41 GARDENER (SEAS) 6629 UCHR B $1,528.18 GARDENER (SEAS) 6629 UCHR C $1,604.59 GARDENER (SEAS) 6629 UCHR D $1,684.82 GARDENER (SEAS) 6629 UCHR E $1,769.06 GARDENER I 6627 ACE A $1,514.21 GARDENER I 6627 ACE B $1,589.91 GARDENER I 6627 ACE C $1,669.41 GARDENER I 6627 ACE D $1,752.89 GARDENER I 6627 ACE E $1,840.53 GARDENER II 6623 ACE A $1,665.64 GARDENER II 6623 ACE B $1,748.91 GARDENER II 6623 ACE C $1,836.37 GARDENER II 6623 ACE D $1,928.19 GARDENER II 6623 ACE E $2,024.60 GIS MANAGER 3079 MM A $3,409.00 GIS MANAGER 3079 MM B $3,579.46 GIS MANAGER 3079 MM C $3,758.42 GIS MANAGER 3079 MM D $3,946.35 GIS MANAGER 3079 MM E $4,143.67 GIS SPECIALIST 3081 ACE A $2,470.21 GIS SPECIALIST 3081 ACE B $2,593.71 GIS SPECIALIST 3081 ACE C $2,723.40 GIS SPECIALIST 3081 ACE D $2,859.56 GIS SPECIALIST 3081 ACE E $3,002.54 GRAF ABAT COORD 6339 ACE A $2,513.89 GRAF ABAT COORD 6339 ACE B $2,639.59 GRAF ABAT COORD 6339 ACE C $2,771.57 GRAF ABAT COORD 6339 ACE D $2,910.14 GRAF ABAT COORD 6339 ACE E $3,055.65 GRAPHIC DESGNR 2775 ACE A $2,188.27 GRAPHIC DESGNR 2775 ACE B $2,297.68 GRAPHIC DESGNR 2775 ACE C $2,412.57 GRAPHIC DESGNR 2775 ACE D $2,533.20 GRAPHIC DESGNR 2775 ACE E $2,659.84 GYMNASTIC SPEC 7543 UCHR A $1,208.09 GYMNASTIC SPEC 7543 UCHR B $1,268.50 GYMNASTIC SPEC 7543 UCHR C $1,331.92 GYMNASTIC SPEC 7543 UCHR D $1,398.52 GYMNASTIC SPEC 7543 UCHR E $1,468.44 Approved and Adopted:  Resolution No.:  * Bi‐weekly rate shown is based on an 80‐hour per pay period. 89 Fiscal  Year 2018‐2019 Compensation Schedule Effective August 17, 2018 POSITION TITLE PCN BARG STEP BI‐WEEKLY RATE* HOUSING MANAGER 4093 SM A $4,280.92 HOUSING MANAGER 4093 SM B $0.00 HOUSING MANAGER 4093 SM C $0.00 HOUSING MANAGER 4093 SM D $0.00 HOUSING MANAGER 4093 SM E $5,162.76 HR ANALYST 3310 PRCF A $2,653.13 HR ANALYST 3310 PRCF B $2,785.78 HR ANALYST 3310 PRCF C $2,925.07 HR ANALYST 3310 PRCF D $3,071.33 HR ANALYST 3310 PRCF E $3,224.89 HR OPS MGR 3317 SM A $4,408.81 HR OPS MGR 3317 SM B $0.00 HR OPS MGR 3317 SM C $0.00 HR OPS MGR 3317 SM D $0.00 HR OPS MGR 3317 SM E $5,358.73 HR TECHNICIAN 3314 UCHR A $1,965.64 HR TECHNICIAN 3314 UCHR B $2,063.91 HR TECHNICIAN 3314 UCHR C $2,167.10 HR TECHNICIAN 3314 UCHR D $2,275.46 HR TECHNICIAN 3314 UCHR E $2,389.24 HR TECHNICIAN 3315 CONF A $1,965.64 HR TECHNICIAN 3315 CONF B $2,063.92 HR TECHNICIAN 3315 CONF C $2,167.10 HR TECHNICIAN 3315 CONF D $2,275.46 HR TECHNICIAN 3315 CONF E $2,389.24 HVAC TECHNICIAN 6430 ACE A $2,189.14 HVAC TECHNICIAN 6430 ACE B $2,298.60 HVAC TECHNICIAN 6430 ACE C $2,413.54 HVAC TECHNICIAN 6430 ACE D $2,534.22 HVAC TECHNICIAN 6430 ACE E $2,660.91 INTERN, GRAD 0269 UCHR A $1,066.42 INTERN, GRAD 0269 UCHR B $1,119.74 INTERN, GRAD 0269 UCHR C $1,175.73 INTERN, GRAD 0269 UCHR D $1,234.51 INTERN, GRAD 0269 UCHR E $1,296.24 INTERN, UNDRGRD 0267 UCHR A $969.47 INTERN, UNDRGRD 0267 UCHR B $1,017.95 INTERN, UNDRGRD 0267 UCHR C $1,068.84 INTERN, UNDRGRD 0267 UCHR D $1,122.29 INTERN, UNDRGRD 0267 UCHR E $1,178.40 IT MGR 5104 SM A $4,237.53 IT MGR 5104 SM B $0.00 IT MGR 5104 SM C $0.00 IT MGR 5104 SM D $0.00 IT MGR 5104 SM E $5,085.24 Approved and Adopted:  Resolution No.:  * Bi‐weekly rate shown is based on an 80‐hour per pay period. 90 Fiscal  Year 2018‐2019 Compensation Schedule Effective August 17, 2018 POSITION TITLE PCN BARG STEP BI‐WEEKLY RATE* IT SUPP SPEC (T) 3014 PROF A $2,789.73 IT SUPP SPEC (T) 3014 PROF B $2,929.22 IT SUPP SPEC (T) 3014 PROF C $3,075.68 IT SUPP SPEC (T) 3014 PROF D $3,229.46 IT SUPP SPEC (T) 3014 PROF E $3,390.94 IT TECHNICIAN 3017 ACE A $2,036.49 IT TECHNICIAN 3017 ACE B $2,138.32 IT TECHNICIAN 3017 ACE C $2,245.23 IT TECHNICIAN 3017 ACE D $2,357.50 IT TECHNICIAN 3017 ACE E $2,475.38 LATENT PRT EXAM 5111 ACE A $2,820.92 LATENT PRT EXAM 5111 ACE B $2,961.97 LATENT PRT EXAM 5111 ACE C $3,110.06 LATENT PRT EXAM 5111 ACE D $3,265.57 LATENT PRT EXAM 5111 ACE E $3,428.83 LATENT PRT EXAM 5112 UCHR A $2,820.92 LATENT PRT EXAM 5112 UCHR B $2,961.97 LATENT PRT EXAM 5112 UCHR C $3,110.06 LATENT PRT EXAM 5112 UCHR D $3,265.57 LATENT PRT EXAM 5112 UCHR E $3,428.83 LAW OFFICE MGR 2465 MMUC A $2,795.14 LAW OFFICE MGR 2465 MMUC B $2,934.90 LAW OFFICE MGR 2465 MMUC C $3,081.64 LAW OFFICE MGR 2465 MMUC D $3,235.73 LAW OFFICE MGR 2465 MMUC E $3,397.51 LEAD CUSTODIAN 6663 ACE A $1,665.64 LEAD CUSTODIAN 6663 ACE B $1,748.91 LEAD CUSTODIAN 6663 ACE C $1,836.37 LEAD CUSTODIAN 6663 ACE D $1,928.19 LEAD CUSTODIAN 6663 ACE E $2,024.60 LEGAL ASSISTANT 0183 CONF A $2,089.58 LEGAL ASSISTANT 0183 CONF B $2,194.06 LEGAL ASSISTANT 0183 CONF C $2,303.76 LEGAL ASSISTANT 0183 CONF D $2,418.94 LEGAL ASSISTANT 0183 CONF E $2,539.89 LIBRARIAN I 7075 ACE A $2,006.26 LIBRARIAN I 7075 ACE B $2,106.59 LIBRARIAN I 7075 ACE C $2,211.90 LIBRARIAN I 7075 ACE D $2,322.50 LIBRARIAN I 7075 ACE E $2,438.63 LIBRARIAN I 7076 UCHR A $2,006.26 LIBRARIAN I 7076 UCHR B $2,106.58 LIBRARIAN I 7076 UCHR C $2,211.90 LIBRARIAN I 7076 UCHR D $2,322.50 LIBRARIAN I 7076 UCHR E $2,438.62 Approved and Adopted:  Resolution No.:  * Bi‐weekly rate shown is based on an 80‐hour per pay period. 91 Fiscal  Year 2018‐2019 Compensation Schedule Effective August 17, 2018 POSITION TITLE PCN BARG STEP BI‐WEEKLY RATE* LIBRARIAN II 7073 ACE A $2,206.87 LIBRARIAN II 7073 ACE B $2,317.22 LIBRARIAN II 7073 ACE C $2,433.08 LIBRARIAN II 7073 ACE D $2,554.73 LIBRARIAN II 7073 ACE E $2,682.48 LIBRARIAN II 7074 UCHR A $2,206.88 LIBRARIAN II 7074 UCHR B $2,317.22 LIBRARIAN II 7074 UCHR C $2,433.08 LIBRARIAN II 7074 UCHR D $2,554.74 LIBRARIAN II 7074 UCHR E $2,682.48 LIBRARIAN III 7071 ACE A $2,427.58 LIBRARIAN III 7071 ACE B $2,548.97 LIBRARIAN III 7071 ACE C $2,676.41 LIBRARIAN III 7071 ACE D $2,810.22 LIBRARIAN III 7071 ACE E $2,950.74 LIBRARY AIDE 7181 UCHR A $880.00 LIBRARY AIDE 7181 UCHR B $885.84 LIBRARY AIDE 7181 UCHR C $930.14 LIBRARY AIDE 7181 UCHR D $976.64 LIBRARY AIDE 7181 UCHR E $1,025.47 LIBRARY ASSOC 7091 ACE A $1,803.68 LIBRARY ASSOC 7091 ACE B $1,893.86 LIBRARY ASSOC 7091 ACE C $1,988.56 LIBRARY ASSOC 7091 ACE D $2,087.99 LIBRARY ASSOC 7091 ACE E $2,192.39 LIBRARY ASSOC 7092 UCHR A $1,803.68 LIBRARY ASSOC 7092 UCHR B $1,893.86 LIBRARY ASSOC 7092 UCHR C $1,988.56 LIBRARY ASSOC 7092 UCHR D $2,087.99 LIBRARY ASSOC 7092 UCHR E $2,192.38 LIBRARY ASST 7157 ACE A $1,427.08 LIBRARY ASST 7157 ACE B $1,498.45 LIBRARY ASST 7157 ACE C $1,573.36 LIBRARY ASST 7157 ACE D $1,652.03 LIBRARY ASST 7157 ACE E $1,734.64 LIBRARY DS MGR 7025 MM A $3,304.68 LIBRARY DS MGR 7025 MM B $3,469.92 LIBRARY DS MGR 7025 MM C $3,643.41 LIBRARY DS MGR 7025 MM D $3,825.58 LIBRARY DS MGR 7025 MM E $4,016.86 LIBRARY OPS MGR 7029 MM A $3,802.09 LIBRARY OPS MGR 7029 MM B $3,992.20 LIBRARY OPS MGR 7029 MM C $4,191.80 LIBRARY OPS MGR 7029 MM D $4,401.40 LIBRARY OPS MGR 7029 MM E $4,621.47 Approved and Adopted:  Resolution No.:  * Bi‐weekly rate shown is based on an 80‐hour per pay period. 92 Fiscal  Year 2018‐2019 Compensation Schedule Effective August 17, 2018 POSITION TITLE PCN BARG STEP BI‐WEEKLY RATE* LIBRARY TECH 7121 ACE A $1,641.16 LIBRARY TECH 7121 ACE B $1,723.22 LIBRARY TECH 7121 ACE C $1,809.38 LIBRARY TECH 7121 ACE D $1,899.84 LIBRARY TECH 7121 ACE E $1,994.83 LIFEGUARD I 7587 UCHR A $1,105.96 LIFEGUARD I 7587 UCHR B $1,161.26 LIFEGUARD I 7587 UCHR C $1,219.33 LIFEGUARD I 7587 UCHR D $1,280.29 LIFEGUARD I 7587 UCHR E $1,344.31 LIFEGUARD II 7585 UCHR A $1,216.59 LIFEGUARD II 7585 UCHR B $1,277.42 LIFEGUARD II 7585 UCHR C $1,341.29 LIFEGUARD II 7585 UCHR D $1,408.36 LIFEGUARD II 7585 UCHR E $1,478.77 LNDSCPE ARCH 4480 PROF A $3,039.79 LNDSCPE ARCH 4480 PROF B $3,191.78 LNDSCPE ARCH 4480 PROF C $3,351.37 LNDSCPE ARCH 4480 PROF D $3,518.94 LNDSCPE ARCH 4480 PROF E $3,694.89 LNDSCPE INSP 6291 ACE A $2,389.25 LNDSCPE INSP 6291 ACE B $2,508.70 LNDSCPE INSP 6291 ACE C $2,634.15 LNDSCPE INSP 6291 ACE D $2,765.84 LNDSCPE INSP 6291 ACE E $2,904.14 LNDSCPE PLAN I 4482 ACE A $2,467.32 LNDSCPE PLAN I 4482 ACE B $2,590.68 LNDSCPE PLAN I 4482 ACE C $2,720.22 LNDSCPE PLAN I 4482 ACE D $2,856.22 LNDSCPE PLAN I 4482 ACE E $2,999.03 LNDSCPE PLAN II 4483 ACE A $2,714.05 LNDSCPE PLAN II 4483 ACE B $2,849.75 LNDSCPE PLAN II 4483 ACE C $2,992.24 LNDSCPE PLAN II 4483 ACE D $3,141.86 LNDSCPE PLAN II 4483 ACE E $3,298.95 LOCKSMITH 6443 ACE A $2,084.89 LOCKSMITH 6443 ACE B $2,189.13 LOCKSMITH 6443 ACE C $2,298.59 LOCKSMITH 6443 ACE D $2,413.53 LOCKSMITH 6443 ACE E $2,534.21 MAINT WORKER I 6377 ACE A $1,514.21 MAINT WORKER I 6377 ACE B $1,589.91 MAINT WORKER I 6377 ACE C $1,669.41 MAINT WORKER I 6377 ACE D $1,752.89 MAINT WORKER I 6377 ACE E $1,840.53 Approved and Adopted:  Resolution No.:  * Bi‐weekly rate shown is based on an 80‐hour per pay period. 93 Fiscal  Year 2018‐2019 Compensation Schedule Effective August 17, 2018 POSITION TITLE PCN BARG STEP BI‐WEEKLY RATE* MAINT WORKER I 6379 UCHR A $1,514.21 MAINT WORKER I 6379 UCHR B $1,589.92 MAINT WORKER I 6379 UCHR C $1,669.42 MAINT WORKER I 6379 UCHR D $1,752.89 MAINT WORKER I 6379 UCHR E $1,840.54 MAINT WORKER II 6373 ACE A $1,665.64 MAINT WORKER II 6373 ACE B $1,748.91 MAINT WORKER II 6373 ACE C $1,836.37 MAINT WORKER II 6373 ACE D $1,928.19 MAINT WORKER II 6373 ACE E $2,024.60 MAINT WORKER II 6381 UCHR A $1,665.63 MAINT WORKER II 6381 UCHR B $1,748.92 MAINT WORKER II 6381 UCHR C $1,836.38 MAINT WORKER II 6381 UCHR D $1,928.18 MAINT WORKER II 6381 UCHR E $2,024.60 MAYOR 2001 MY A $0.00 MAYOR 2001 MY B $0.00 MAYOR 2001 MY C $0.00 MAYOR 2001 MY D $0.00 MAYOR 2001 MY E $4,863.99 MECHANIC ASST 6550 ACE A $1,663.74 MECHANIC ASST 6550 ACE B $1,746.93 MECHANIC ASST 6550 ACE C $1,834.29 MECHANIC ASST 6550 ACE D $1,925.99 MECHANIC ASST 6550 ACE E $2,022.31 MGMT ANALYST 0223 CONF A $2,607.39 MGMT ANALYST 0223 CONF B $2,737.76 MGMT ANALYST 0223 CONF C $2,874.65 MGMT ANALYST 0223 CONF D $3,018.38 MGMT ANALYST 0223 CONF E $3,169.29 MGMT ANALYST 0225 ACE A $2,607.39 MGMT ANALYST 0225 ACE B $2,737.76 MGMT ANALYST 0225 ACE C $2,874.65 MGMT ANALYST 0225 ACE D $3,018.38 MGMT ANALYST 0225 ACE E $3,169.29 MKTG & COMM MGR 2781 SM A $4,509.80 MKTG & COMM MGR 2781 SM B $0.00 MKTG & COMM MGR 2781 SM C $4,637.01 MKTG & COMM MGR 2781 SM D $0.00 MKTG & COMM MGR 2781 SM E $5,481.70 OFFICE SPEC 0160 UCHR A $1,473.11 OFFICE SPEC 0160 UCHR B $1,546.75 OFFICE SPEC 0160 UCHR C $1,624.10 OFFICE SPEC 0160 UCHR D $1,705.30 OFFICE SPEC 0160 UCHR E $1,790.57 Approved and Adopted:  Resolution No.:  * Bi‐weekly rate shown is based on an 80‐hour per pay period. 94 Fiscal  Year 2018‐2019 Compensation Schedule Effective August 17, 2018 POSITION TITLE PCN BARG STEP BI‐WEEKLY RATE* OFFICE SPEC 0161 ACE A $1,473.10 OFFICE SPEC 0161 ACE B $1,546.75 OFFICE SPEC 0161 ACE C $1,624.10 OFFICE SPEC 0161 ACE D $1,705.30 OFFICE SPEC 0161 ACE E $1,790.56 OFFICE SPEC‐MYR 0162 ACE A $1,473.10 OFFICE SPEC‐MYR 0162 ACE B $1,546.75 OFFICE SPEC‐MYR 0162 ACE C $1,624.10 OFFICE SPEC‐MYR 0162 ACE D $1,705.30 OFFICE SPEC‐MYR 0162 ACE E $1,790.56 OPEN SPACE INSP 6311 ACE A $2,389.25 OPEN SPACE INSP 6311 ACE B $2,508.70 OPEN SPACE INSP 6311 ACE C $2,634.15 OPEN SPACE INSP 6311 ACE D $2,765.84 OPEN SPACE INSP 6311 ACE E $2,904.14 OPEN SPACE MGR 6302 MM A $3,223.52 OPEN SPACE MGR 6302 MM B $3,384.69 OPEN SPACE MGR 6302 MM C $3,553.92 OPEN SPACE MGR 6302 MM D $3,731.62 OPEN SPACE MGR 6302 MM E $3,918.20 OPS&TELECOM MGR 3025 MM A $3,408.99 OPS&TELECOM MGR 3025 MM B $3,579.45 OPS&TELECOM MGR 3025 MM C $3,758.41 OPS&TELECOM MGR 3025 MM D $3,946.34 OPS&TELECOM MGR 3025 MM E $4,143.66 PAINTER 6434 ACE A $1,990.14 PAINTER 6434 ACE B $2,089.64 PAINTER 6434 ACE C $2,194.12 PAINTER 6434 ACE D $2,303.83 PAINTER 6434 ACE E $2,419.02 PARALEGAL 2475 CONF A $2,242.43 PARALEGAL 2475 CONF B $2,354.55 PARALEGAL 2475 CONF C $2,472.28 PARALEGAL 2475 CONF D $2,595.90 PARALEGAL 2475 CONF E $2,725.69 PARK ENF OFF HR 5152 UCHR A $1,488.90 PARK ENF OFF HR 5152 UCHR B $1,563.34 PARK ENF OFF HR 5152 UCHR C $1,641.50 PARK ENF OFF HR 5152 UCHR D $1,723.58 PARK ENF OFF HR 5152 UCHR E $1,809.76 PARK RANGER 7434 UCHR A $1,059.90 PARK RANGER 7434 UCHR B $1,112.89 PARK RANGER 7434 UCHR C $1,168.53 PARK RANGER 7434 UCHR D $1,226.96 PARK RANGER 7434 UCHR E $1,288.31 Approved and Adopted:  Resolution No.:  * Bi‐weekly rate shown is based on an 80‐hour per pay period. 95 Fiscal  Year 2018‐2019 Compensation Schedule Effective August 17, 2018 POSITION TITLE PCN BARG STEP BI‐WEEKLY RATE* PARK RANGER SUP 7441 ACE A $2,538.76 PARK RANGER SUP 7441 ACE B $2,665.70 PARK RANGER SUP 7441 ACE C $2,798.99 PARK RANGER SUP 7441 ACE D $2,938.94 PARK RANGER SUP 7441 ACE E $3,085.88 PARKING ENF OFF 5154 ACE A $1,488.89 PARKING ENF OFF 5154 ACE B $1,563.33 PARKING ENF OFF 5154 ACE C $1,641.51 PARKING ENF OFF 5154 ACE D $1,723.58 PARKING ENF OFF 5154 ACE E $1,809.76 PARKING MTR TEC 3693 ACE A $1,637.78 PARKING MTR TEC 3693 ACE B $1,719.68 PARKING MTR TEC 3693 ACE C $1,805.66 PARKING MTR TEC 3693 ACE D $1,895.94 PARKING MTR TEC 3693 ACE E $1,990.73 PARKS MANAGER 6604 MM A $3,223.73 PARKS MANAGER 6604 MM B $3,384.92 PARKS MANAGER 6604 MM C $3,554.17 PARKS MANAGER 6604 MM D $3,731.87 PARKS MANAGER 6604 MM E $3,918.47 PARKS OPS MGR 6610 MM A $3,780.66 PARKS OPS MGR 6610 MM B $3,969.70 PARKS OPS MGR 6610 MM C $4,168.18 PARKS OPS MGR 6610 MM D $4,376.59 PARKS OPS MGR 6610 MM E $4,595.42 PARKS REC ADM 7407 SM A $4,513.76 PARKS REC ADM 7407 SM B $4,739.44 PARKS REC ADM 7407 SM C $4,976.42 PARKS REC ADM 7407 SM D $5,225.24 PARKS REC ADM 7407 SM E $5,486.50 PARKS SUPV 6605 ACE A $2,538.76 PARKS SUPV 6605 ACE B $2,665.70 PARKS SUPV 6605 ACE C $2,798.99 PARKS SUPV 6605 ACE D $2,938.94 PARKS SUPV 6605 ACE E $3,085.88 PEACE OFFICER 5061 POA A $2,969.45 PEACE OFFICER 5061 POA B $3,117.92 PEACE OFFICER 5061 POA C $3,273.81 PEACE OFFICER 5061 POA D $3,437.50 PEACE OFFICER 5061 POA E $3,609.38 PERF & OD MGR 2758 SM A $4,302.33 PERF & OD MGR 2758 SM B $0.00 PERF & OD MGR 2758 SM C $0.00 PERF & OD MGR 2758 SM D $0.00 PERF & OD MGR 2758 SM E $5,162.76 Approved and Adopted:  Resolution No.:  * Bi‐weekly rate shown is based on an 80‐hour per pay period. 96 Fiscal  Year 2018‐2019 Compensation Schedule Effective August 17, 2018 POSITION TITLE PCN BARG STEP BI‐WEEKLY RATE* PLAN CHK SUPV 4731 MM A $3,723.11 PLAN CHK SUPV 4731 MM B $3,909.27 PLAN CHK SUPV 4731 MM C $4,104.74 PLAN CHK SUPV 4731 MM D $4,309.97 PLAN CHK SUPV 4731 MM E $4,525.46 PLAN CHK TECH 4753 ACE A $2,285.36 PLAN CHK TECH 4753 ACE B $2,399.63 PLAN CHK TECH 4753 ACE C $2,519.61 PLAN CHK TECH 4753 ACE D $2,645.59 PLAN CHK TECH 4753 ACE E $2,777.87 PLANNING MGR 4727 SM A $4,481.49 PLANNING MGR 4727 SM B $0.00 PLANNING MGR 4727 SM C $0.00 PLANNING MGR 4727 SM D $0.00 PLANNING MGR 4727 SM E $5,406.40 PLANNING TECH 4527 ACE A $1,877.76 PLANNING TECH 4527 ACE B $1,971.64 PLANNING TECH 4527 ACE C $2,070.22 PLANNING TECH 4527 ACE D $2,173.74 PLANNING TECH 4527 ACE E $2,282.42 PLUMBER 6432 ACE A $2,189.13 PLUMBER 6432 ACE B $2,298.59 PLUMBER 6432 ACE C $2,413.53 PLUMBER 6432 ACE D $2,534.21 PLUMBER 6432 ACE E $2,660.90 POL AGENT 5051 POA A $3,269.84 POL AGENT 5051 POA B $3,433.33 POL AGENT 5051 POA C $3,605.00 POL AGENT 5051 POA D $3,785.24 POL AGENT 5051 POA E $3,974.50 POL AS ADMIN 5025 SM A $4,383.03 POL AS ADMIN 5025 SM B $0.00 POL AS ADMIN 5025 SM C $0.00 POL AS ADMIN 5025 SM D $0.00 POL AS ADMIN 5025 SM E $5,327.41 POL CADET 5427 UCHR A $897.24 POL CADET 5427 UCHR B $942.10 POL CADET 5427 UCHR C $989.20 POL CADET 5427 UCHR D $1,038.66 POL CADET 5427 UCHR E $1,090.60 POL CAPTAIN 5022 SM A $5,810.62 POL CAPTAIN 5022 SM B $0.00 POL CAPTAIN 5022 SM C $0.00 POL CAPTAIN 5022 SM D $0.00 POL CAPTAIN 5022 SM E $7,062.56 Approved and Adopted:  Resolution No.:  * Bi‐weekly rate shown is based on an 80‐hour per pay period. 97 Fiscal  Year 2018‐2019 Compensation Schedule Effective August 17, 2018 POSITION TITLE PCN BARG STEP BI‐WEEKLY RATE* POL COM SYS MGR 5185 MM A $3,409.39 POL COM SYS MGR 5185 MM B $3,579.85 POL COM SYS MGR 5185 MM C $3,758.85 POL COM SYS MGR 5185 MM D $3,946.79 POL COM SYS MGR 5185 MM E $4,144.13 POL COMREL SPC 5258 ACE A $1,922.58 POL COMREL SPC 5258 ACE B $2,018.70 POL COMREL SPC 5258 ACE C $2,119.64 POL COMREL SPC 5258 ACE D $2,225.62 POL COMREL SPC 5258 ACE E $2,336.90 POL DISPATCH SP 5183 ACE A $2,542.46 POL DISPATCH SP 5183 ACE B $2,669.60 POL DISPATCH SP 5183 ACE C $2,803.06 POL DISPATCH SP 5183 ACE D $2,943.22 POL DISPATCH SP 5183 ACE E $3,090.39 POL DISPATCH TR 5179 ACE A $2,009.86 POL DISPATCH TR 5179 ACE B $2,110.35 POL DISPATCH TR 5179 ACE C $2,215.87 POL DISPATCH TR 5179 ACE D $2,326.66 POL DISPATCH TR 5179 ACE E $2,442.99 POL DISPATCHER 5180 UCHR A $2,210.84 POL DISPATCHER 5180 UCHR B $2,321.38 POL DISPATCHER 5180 UCHR C $2,437.45 POL DISPATCHER 5180 UCHR D $2,559.34 POL DISPATCHER 5180 UCHR E $2,687.27 POL DISPATCHER 5181 ACE A $2,210.84 POL DISPATCHER 5181 ACE B $2,321.38 POL DISPATCHER 5181 ACE C $2,437.45 POL DISPATCHER 5181 ACE D $2,559.33 POL DISPATCHER 5181 ACE E $2,687.28 POL LIEUTENANT 5031 POA A $4,513.90 POL LIEUTENANT 5031 POA B $4,739.59 POL LIEUTENANT 5031 POA C $4,976.57 POL LIEUTENANT 5031 POA D $5,225.40 POL LIEUTENANT 5031 POA E $5,486.67 POL REC SPEC 0165 ACE A $1,473.12 POL REC SPEC 0165 ACE B $1,546.78 POL REC SPEC 0165 ACE C $1,624.13 POL REC SPEC 0165 ACE D $1,705.33 POL REC SPEC 0165 ACE E $1,790.59 POL REC SPEC 0166 UCHR A $1,473.13 POL REC SPEC 0166 UCHR B $1,546.78 POL REC SPEC 0166 UCHR C $1,624.14 POL REC SPEC 0166 UCHR D $1,705.34 POL REC SPEC 0166 UCHR E $1,790.60 Approved and Adopted:  Resolution No.:  * Bi‐weekly rate shown is based on an 80‐hour per pay period. 98 Fiscal  Year 2018‐2019 Compensation Schedule Effective August 17, 2018 POSITION TITLE PCN BARG STEP BI‐WEEKLY RATE* POL REC&SUP SPV 5203 ACE A $1,948.21 POL REC&SUP SPV 5203 ACE B $2,045.62 POL REC&SUP SPV 5203 ACE C $2,147.90 POL REC&SUP SPV 5203 ACE D $2,255.28 POL REC&SUP SPV 5203 ACE E $2,368.06 POL RECRUIT 5071 ACE A $2,383.83 POL RECRUIT 5071 ACE B $2,503.02 POL RECRUIT 5071 ACE C $0.00 POL RECRUIT 5071 ACE D $0.00 POL RECRUIT 5071 ACE E $0.00 POL SERGEANT 5041 POA A $3,761.29 POL SERGEANT 5041 POA B $3,949.36 POL SERGEANT 5041 POA C $4,146.83 POL SERGEANT 5041 POA D $4,354.17 POL SERGEANT 5041 POA E $4,571.87 POL SVCS MGR 5205 MM A $3,299.93 POL SVCS MGR 5205 MM B $3,464.93 POL SVCS MGR 5205 MM C $3,638.18 POL SVCS MGR 5205 MM D $3,820.08 POL SVCS MGR 5205 MM E $4,011.09 POL SVCS OF SUP 5132 ACE A $2,278.96 POL SVCS OF SUP 5132 ACE B $2,392.90 POL SVCS OF SUP 5132 ACE C $2,512.55 POL SVCS OF SUP 5132 ACE D $2,638.18 POL SVCS OF SUP 5132 ACE E $2,770.09 POL SVCS OFF 5131 ACE A $1,981.72 POL SVCS OFF 5131 ACE B $2,080.79 POL SVCS OFF 5131 ACE C $2,184.83 POL SVCS OFF 5131 ACE D $2,294.07 POL SVCS OFF 5131 ACE E $2,408.77 POL SVCS TECH 5415 ACE A $1,890.62 POL SVCS TECH 5415 ACE B $1,985.15 POL SVCS TECH 5415 ACE C $2,084.42 POL SVCS TECH 5415 ACE D $2,188.63 POL SVCS TECH 5415 ACE E $2,298.07 POL TECH MGR 5209 MM A $3,409.00 POL TECH MGR 5209 MM B $3,579.46 POL TECH MGR 5209 MM C $3,758.42 POL TECH MGR 5209 MM D $3,946.35 POL TECH MGR 5209 MM E $4,143.67 POL TECH SPEC 5107 ACE A $2,988.94 POL TECH SPEC 5107 ACE B $3,138.39 POL TECH SPEC 5107 ACE C $3,295.30 POL TECH SPEC 5107 ACE D $3,460.06 POL TECH SPEC 5107 ACE E $3,633.07 Approved and Adopted:  Resolution No.:  * Bi‐weekly rate shown is based on an 80‐hour per pay period. 99 Fiscal  Year 2018‐2019 Compensation Schedule Effective August 17, 2018 POSITION TITLE PCN BARG STEP BI‐WEEKLY RATE* POL TECH SPEC 5108 UCHR A $2,988.94 POL TECH SPEC 5108 UCHR B $3,138.38 POL TECH SPEC 5108 UCHR C $3,295.30 POL TECH SPEC 5108 UCHR D $3,460.07 POL TECH SPEC 5108 UCHR E $3,633.07 POLICY AIDE 2013 PRUC A $2,234.78 POLICY AIDE 2013 PRUC B $2,346.52 POLICY AIDE 2013 PRUC C $2,463.85 POLICY AIDE 2013 PRUC D $2,587.04 POLICY AIDE 2013 PRUC E $2,716.39 PRCRMNT SRV ANL 3717 MM A $3,071.53 PRCRMNT SRV ANL 3717 MM B $3,225.10 PRCRMNT SRV ANL 3717 MM C $3,386.36 PRCRMNT SRV ANL 3717 MM D $3,555.68 PRCRMNT SRV ANL 3717 MM E $3,733.46 PRGRMMR ANALYST 3090 PROF A $2,761.83 PRGRMMR ANALYST 3090 PROF B $2,899.93 PRGRMMR ANALYST 3090 PROF C $3,044.92 PRGRMMR ANALYST 3090 PROF D $3,197.17 PRGRMMR ANALYST 3090 PROF E $3,357.02 PRIN CIVIL ENG 6021 MM A $4,086.82 PRIN CIVIL ENG 6021 MM B $4,291.16 PRIN CIVIL ENG 6021 MM C $4,505.72 PRIN CIVIL ENG 6021 MM D $4,731.00 PRIN CIVIL ENG 6021 MM E $4,967.55 PRIN ED SPEC 2724 PROF A $3,800.10 PRIN ED SPEC 2724 PROF B $3,990.11 PRIN ED SPEC 2724 PROF C $4,189.61 PRIN ED SPEC 2724 PROF D $4,399.09 PRIN ED SPEC 2724 PROF E $4,619.04 PRIN HR ANALYST 3305 MMCF A $3,524.04 PRIN HR ANALYST 3305 MMCF B $3,700.24 PRIN HR ANALYST 3305 MMCF C $3,885.25 PRIN HR ANALYST 3305 MMCF D $4,079.52 PRIN HR ANALYST 3305 MMCF E $4,283.49 PRIN LDSCP ARCH 4486 MM A $3,800.10 PRIN LDSCP ARCH 4486 MM B $3,990.11 PRIN LDSCP ARCH 4486 MM C $4,189.61 PRIN LDSCP ARCH 4486 MM D $4,399.09 PRIN LDSCP ARCH 4486 MM E $4,619.04 PRIN LIBRARIAN 7051 MM A $3,304.68 PRIN LIBRARIAN 7051 MM B $3,469.92 PRIN LIBRARIAN 7051 MM C $3,643.41 PRIN LIBRARIAN 7051 MM D $3,825.58 PRIN LIBRARIAN 7051 MM E $4,016.86 Approved and Adopted:  Resolution No.:  * Bi‐weekly rate shown is based on an 80‐hour per pay period. 100 Fiscal  Year 2018‐2019 Compensation Schedule Effective August 17, 2018 POSITION TITLE PCN BARG STEP BI‐WEEKLY RATE* PRIN MGMT ANLYT 0208 PROF A $3,154.98 PRIN MGMT ANLYT 0208 PROF B $3,312.74 PRIN MGMT ANLYT 0208 PROF C $3,478.37 PRIN MGMT ANLYT 0208 PROF D $3,652.29 PRIN MGMT ANLYT 0208 PROF E $3,834.90 PRIN MGMT ANLYT 0214 PRCF A $3,154.98 PRIN MGMT ANLYT 0214 PRCF B $3,312.74 PRIN MGMT ANLYT 0214 PRCF C $3,478.37 PRIN MGMT ANLYT 0214 PRCF D $3,652.29 PRIN MGMT ANLYT 0214 PRCF E $3,834.90 PRIN PLANNER 4431 MM A $3,800.10 PRIN PLANNER 4431 MM B $3,990.11 PRIN PLANNER 4431 MM C $4,189.61 PRIN PLANNER 4431 MM D $4,399.09 PRIN PLANNER 4431 MM E $4,619.04 PRIN PROJ COORD 4212 PROF A $3,800.10 PRIN PROJ COORD 4212 PROF B $3,990.11 PRIN PROJ COORD 4212 PROF C $4,189.61 PRIN PROJ COORD 4212 PROF D $4,399.09 PRIN PROJ COORD 4212 PROF E $4,619.04 PRIN REC MGR 7410 MM A $3,223.72 PRIN REC MGR 7410 MM B $3,384.90 PRIN REC MGR 7410 MM C $3,554.15 PRIN REC MGR 7410 MM D $3,731.85 PRIN REC MGR 7410 MM E $3,918.45 PRIN TRAFF ENG 6020 MM A $4,086.82 PRIN TRAFF ENG 6020 MM B $4,291.16 PRIN TRAFF ENG 6020 MM C $4,505.72 PRIN TRAFF ENG 6020 MM D $4,731.00 PRIN TRAFF ENG 6020 MM E $4,967.55 PROCUREMNT SPEC 3721 ACE A $2,323.04 PROCUREMNT SPEC 3721 ACE B $2,439.18 PROCUREMNT SPEC 3721 ACE C $2,561.13 PROCUREMNT SPEC 3721 ACE D $2,689.20 PROCUREMNT SPEC 3721 ACE E $2,823.66 PROJECT COOR I 4217 ACE A $2,467.32 PROJECT COOR I 4217 ACE B $2,590.68 PROJECT COOR I 4217 ACE C $2,720.22 PROJECT COOR I 4217 ACE D $2,856.22 PROJECT COOR I 4217 ACE E $2,999.03 PROJECT COOR I 4218 UCHR A $2,467.32 PROJECT COOR I 4218 UCHR B $2,590.68 PROJECT COOR I 4218 UCHR C $2,720.22 PROJECT COOR I 4218 UCHR D $2,856.22 PROJECT COOR I 4218 UCHR E $2,999.04 Approved and Adopted:  Resolution No.:  * Bi‐weekly rate shown is based on an 80‐hour per pay period. 101 Fiscal  Year 2018‐2019 Compensation Schedule Effective August 17, 2018 POSITION TITLE PCN BARG STEP BI‐WEEKLY RATE* PROJECT COOR II 4215 ACE A $2,714.05 PROJECT COOR II 4215 ACE B $2,849.75 PROJECT COOR II 4215 ACE C $2,992.24 PROJECT COOR II 4215 ACE D $3,141.86 PROJECT COOR II 4215 ACE E $3,298.95 PROP & EVD SPEC 5127 ACE A $1,637.78 PROP & EVD SPEC 5127 ACE B $1,719.68 PROP & EVD SPEC 5127 ACE C $1,805.66 PROP & EVD SPEC 5127 ACE D $1,895.94 PROP & EVD SPEC 5127 ACE E $1,990.73 PROP & EVD SPEC 5128 UCHR A $1,637.78 PROP & EVD SPEC 5128 UCHR B $1,719.68 PROP & EVD SPEC 5128 UCHR C $1,805.66 PROP & EVD SPEC 5128 UCHR D $1,895.94 PROP & EVD SPEC 5128 UCHR E $1,990.74 PUB INFO SPEC 2782 CONF A $2,338.49 PUB INFO SPEC 2782 CONF B $2,455.44 PUB INFO SPEC 2782 CONF C $2,578.20 PUB INFO SPEC 2782 CONF D $2,707.11 PUB INFO SPEC 2782 CONF E $2,842.46 PUB SFTY ANLYT 5254 ACE A $2,558.97 PUB SFTY ANLYT 5254 ACE B $2,686.91 PUB SFTY ANLYT 5254 ACE C $2,821.26 PUB SFTY ANLYT 5254 ACE D $2,962.34 PUB SFTY ANLYT 5254 ACE E $3,110.44 PUB WRKS INP I 6123 ACE A $2,389.25 PUB WRKS INP I 6123 ACE B $2,508.70 PUB WRKS INP I 6123 ACE C $2,634.15 PUB WRKS INP I 6123 ACE D $2,765.84 PUB WRKS INP I 6123 ACE E $2,904.14 PUB WRKS INP II 6121 ACE A $2,628.16 PUB WRKS INP II 6121 ACE B $2,759.57 PUB WRKS INP II 6121 ACE C $2,897.54 PUB WRKS INP II 6121 ACE D $3,042.43 PUB WRKS INP II 6121 ACE E $3,194.55 PUB WRKS MGR 6336 MM A $3,223.52 PUB WRKS MGR 6336 MM B $3,384.69 PUB WRKS MGR 6336 MM C $3,553.92 PUB WRKS MGR 6336 MM D $3,731.62 PUB WRKS MGR 6336 MM E $3,918.20 PUB WRKS SPEC 6712 ACE A $1,904.46 PUB WRKS SPEC 6712 ACE B $1,999.68 PUB WRKS SPEC 6712 ACE C $2,099.66 PUB WRKS SPEC 6712 ACE D $2,204.65 PUB WRKS SPEC 6712 ACE E $2,314.89 Approved and Adopted:  Resolution No.:  * Bi‐weekly rate shown is based on an 80‐hour per pay period. 102 Fiscal  Year 2018‐2019 Compensation Schedule Effective August 17, 2018 POSITION TITLE PCN BARG STEP BI‐WEEKLY RATE* PUB WRKS SPEC 6714 UCHR A $1,904.46 PUB WRKS SPEC 6714 UCHR B $1,999.68 PUB WRKS SPEC 6714 UCHR C $2,099.66 PUB WRKS SPEC 6714 UCHR D $2,204.66 PUB WRKS SPEC 6714 UCHR E $2,314.90 PUB WRKS SUPDT 6327 SM A $4,324.51 PUB WRKS SUPDT 6327 SM B $4,540.74 PUB WRKS SUPDT 6327 SM C $4,767.77 PUB WRKS SUPDT 6327 SM D $5,006.16 PUB WRKS SUPDT 6327 SM E $5,256.47 PUB WRKS SUPV 6337 ACE A $2,538.76 PUB WRKS SUPV 6337 ACE B $2,665.70 PUB WRKS SUPV 6337 ACE C $2,798.99 PUB WRKS SUPV 6337 ACE D $2,938.94 PUB WRKS SUPV 6337 ACE E $3,085.88 PUMP MAINT SUPV 6392 ACE A $2,541.71 PUMP MAINT SUPV 6392 ACE B $2,668.79 PUMP MAINT SUPV 6392 ACE C $2,802.24 PUMP MAINT SUPV 6392 ACE D $2,942.33 PUMP MAINT SUPV 6392 ACE E $3,089.46 PUMP MAINT TECH 6396 ACE A $2,168.87 PUMP MAINT TECH 6396 ACE B $2,277.32 PUMP MAINT TECH 6396 ACE C $2,391.20 PUMP MAINT TECH 6396 ACE D $2,510.73 PUMP MAINT TECH 6396 ACE E $2,636.28 PURCHASING AGT 3711 SM A $3,938.16 PURCHASING AGT 3711 SM B $0.00 PURCHASING AGT 3711 SM C $0.00 PURCHASING AGT 3711 SM D $0.00 PURCHASING AGT 3711 SM E $4,786.85 RANGE MASTER 5417 ACE A $1,801.55 RANGE MASTER 5417 ACE B $1,891.63 RANGE MASTER 5417 ACE C $1,986.22 RANGE MASTER 5417 ACE D $2,085.53 RANGE MASTER 5417 ACE E $2,189.81 RANGE MASTER 5418 UCHR A $1,801.56 RANGE MASTER 5418 UCHR B $1,891.63 RANGE MASTER 5418 UCHR C $1,986.22 RANGE MASTER 5418 UCHR D $2,085.54 RANGE MASTER 5418 UCHR E $2,189.80 REAL PROP MGR 6037 MMUC A $3,538.49 REAL PROP MGR 6037 MMUC B $3,715.41 REAL PROP MGR 6037 MMUC C $3,901.18 REAL PROP MGR 6037 MMUC D $4,096.24 REAL PROP MGR 6037 MMUC E $4,301.05 Approved and Adopted:  Resolution No.:  * Bi‐weekly rate shown is based on an 80‐hour per pay period. 103 Fiscal  Year 2018‐2019 Compensation Schedule Effective August 17, 2018 POSITION TITLE PCN BARG STEP BI‐WEEKLY RATE* REC AIDE 7605 UCHR A $0.00 REC AIDE 7605 UCHR B $0.00 REC AIDE 7605 UCHR C $882.36 REC AIDE 7605 UCHR D $926.48 REC AIDE 7605 UCHR E $972.80 REC LEADER I 7609 UCHR A $916.16 REC LEADER I 7609 UCHR B $961.97 REC LEADER I 7609 UCHR C $1,010.07 REC LEADER I 7609 UCHR D $1,060.57 REC LEADER I 7609 UCHR E $1,113.60 REC LEADER II 7607 UCHR A $1,053.72 REC LEADER II 7607 UCHR B $1,106.40 REC LEADER II 7607 UCHR C $1,161.72 REC LEADER II 7607 UCHR D $1,219.81 REC LEADER II 7607 UCHR E $1,280.80 REC SPECIALIST 7601 UCHR A $1,264.33 REC SPECIALIST 7601 UCHR B $1,327.55 REC SPECIALIST 7601 UCHR C $1,393.92 REC SPECIALIST 7601 UCHR D $1,463.62 REC SPECIALIST 7601 UCHR E $1,536.80 REC SUPVISR I 7425 ACE A $1,912.57 REC SUPVISR I 7425 ACE B $2,008.19 REC SUPVISR I 7425 ACE C $2,108.61 REC SUPVISR I 7425 ACE D $2,214.03 REC SUPVISR I 7425 ACE E $2,324.73 REC SUPVISR I 7426 UCHR A $1,912.58 REC SUPVISR I 7426 UCHR B $2,008.19 REC SUPVISR I 7426 UCHR C $2,108.61 REC SUPVISR I 7426 UCHR D $2,214.04 REC SUPVISR I 7426 UCHR E $2,324.74 REC SUPVISR II 7423 ACE A $2,103.82 REC SUPVISR II 7423 ACE B $2,209.01 REC SUPVISR II 7423 ACE C $2,319.47 REC SUPVISR II 7423 ACE D $2,435.44 REC SUPVISR II 7423 ACE E $2,557.22 REC SUPVISR III 7422 ACE A $2,419.41 REC SUPVISR III 7422 ACE B $2,540.38 REC SUPVISR III 7422 ACE C $2,667.40 REC SUPVISR III 7422 ACE D $2,800.77 REC SUPVISR III 7422 ACE E $2,940.81 RECORDS MANAGER 2211 MM A $2,627.84 RECORDS MANAGER 2211 MM B $2,759.23 RECORDS MANAGER 2211 MM C $2,897.19 RECORDS MANAGER 2211 MM D $3,042.05 RECORDS MANAGER 2211 MM E $3,194.15 Approved and Adopted:  Resolution No.:  * Bi‐weekly rate shown is based on an 80‐hour per pay period. 104 Fiscal  Year 2018‐2019 Compensation Schedule Effective August 17, 2018 POSITION TITLE PCN BARG STEP BI‐WEEKLY RATE* RECORDS SPEC 2217 ACE A $1,620.43 RECORDS SPEC 2217 ACE B $1,701.46 RECORDS SPEC 2217 ACE C $1,786.53 RECORDS SPEC 2217 ACE D $1,875.86 RECORDS SPEC 2217 ACE E $1,969.64 RECYCLG SPEC I 2742 ACE A $1,886.64 RECYCLG SPEC I 2742 ACE B $1,980.97 RECYCLG SPEC I 2742 ACE C $2,080.02 RECYCLG SPEC I 2742 ACE D $2,184.01 RECYCLG SPEC I 2742 ACE E $2,293.22 RECYCLG SPEC II 2744 ACE A $2,075.30 RECYCLG SPEC II 2744 ACE B $2,179.08 RECYCLG SPEC II 2744 ACE C $2,288.02 RECYCLG SPEC II 2744 ACE D $2,402.43 RECYCLG SPEC II 2744 ACE E $2,522.55 REG VET TECH 5307 ACE A $1,801.55 REG VET TECH 5307 ACE B $1,891.63 REG VET TECH 5307 ACE C $1,986.22 REG VET TECH 5307 ACE D $2,085.53 REG VET TECH 5307 ACE E $2,189.81 REG VET TECH 5312 UCHR A $1,801.56 REG VET TECH 5312 UCHR B $1,891.63 REG VET TECH 5312 UCHR C $1,986.22 REG VET TECH 5312 UCHR D $2,085.54 REG VET TECH 5312 UCHR E $2,189.80 RESERVE OFFICER 5081 UCHR A $1,139.42 RESERVE OFFICER 5081 UCHR B $1,195.85 RESERVE OFFICER 5081 UCHR C $1,255.53 RESERVE OFFICER 5081 UCHR D $0.00 RESERVE OFFICER 5081 UCHR E $0.00 RET ANNT ‐ HO C 9901 UCHR A $3,021.63 RET ANNT ‐ HO C 9901 UCHR B $3,172.71 RET ANNT ‐ HO C 9901 UCHR C $3,331.35 RET ANNT ‐ HO C 9901 UCHR D $3,497.91 RET ANNT ‐ HO C 9901 UCHR E $3,672.81 REVENUE MANAGER 3689 SM A $4,223.08 REVENUE MANAGER 3689 SM B $0.00 REVENUE MANAGER 3689 SM C $0.00 REVENUE MANAGER 3689 SM D $0.00 REVENUE MANAGER 3689 SM E $5,133.18 RISK MANAGER 3361 SM A $4,101.55 RISK MANAGER 3361 SM B $0.00 RISK MANAGER 3361 SM C $0.00 RISK MANAGER 3361 SM D $0.00 RISK MANAGER 3361 SM E $4,985.52 Approved and Adopted:  Resolution No.:  * Bi‐weekly rate shown is based on an 80‐hour per pay period. 105 Fiscal  Year 2018‐2019 Compensation Schedule Effective August 17, 2018 POSITION TITLE PCN BARG STEP BI‐WEEKLY RATE* RISK MGMT SPEC 3367 PRCF A $2,653.01 RISK MGMT SPEC 3367 PRCF B $2,785.66 RISK MGMT SPEC 3367 PRCF C $2,924.94 RISK MGMT SPEC 3367 PRCF D $3,071.19 RISK MGMT SPEC 3367 PRCF E $3,224.75 SEASONAL ASST 0231 UCHR A $0.00 SEASONAL ASST 0231 UCHR B $0.00 SEASONAL ASST 0231 UCHR C $0.00 SEASONAL ASST 0231 UCHR D $884.67 SEASONAL ASST 0231 UCHR E $928.90 SECRETARY 0171 ACE A $1,620.43 SECRETARY 0171 ACE B $1,701.46 SECRETARY 0171 ACE C $1,786.53 SECRETARY 0171 ACE D $1,875.86 SECRETARY 0171 ACE E $1,969.64 SGNL SYS ENG I 6169 ACE A $2,746.79 SGNL SYS ENG I 6169 ACE B $2,884.13 SGNL SYS ENG I 6169 ACE C $3,028.33 SGNL SYS ENG I 6169 ACE D $3,179.76 SGNL SYS ENG I 6169 ACE E $3,338.74 SGNL SYS ENG II 6170 ACE A $3,021.46 SGNL SYS ENG II 6170 ACE B $3,172.55 SGNL SYS ENG II 6170 ACE C $3,331.17 SGNL SYS ENG II 6170 ACE D $3,497.73 SGNL SYS ENG II 6170 ACE E $3,672.61 SIGN&STRPE SUPV 6355 ACE A $2,538.76 SIGN&STRPE SUPV 6355 ACE B $2,665.70 SIGN&STRPE SUPV 6355 ACE C $2,798.99 SIGN&STRPE SUPV 6355 ACE D $2,938.94 SIGN&STRPE SUPV 6355 ACE E $3,085.88 SPEC EVNTS COOR 2799 PRUC A $3,032.11 SPEC EVNTS COOR 2799 PRUC B $3,183.72 SPEC EVNTS COOR 2799 PRUC C $3,342.91 SPEC EVNTS COOR 2799 PRUC D $3,510.05 SPEC EVNTS COOR 2799 PRUC E $3,685.56 SR ACCOUNTANT 3630 MMCF A $2,825.42 SR ACCOUNTANT 3630 MMCF B $2,966.69 SR ACCOUNTANT 3630 MMCF C $3,115.02 SR ACCOUNTANT 3630 MMCF D $3,270.77 SR ACCOUNTANT 3630 MMCF E $3,434.31 SR ACCTG ASST 3651 ACE A $1,925.45 SR ACCTG ASST 3651 ACE B $2,021.73 SR ACCTG ASST 3651 ACE C $2,122.82 SR ACCTG ASST 3651 ACE D $2,228.97 SR ACCTG ASST 3651 ACE E $2,340.41 Approved and Adopted:  Resolution No.:  * Bi‐weekly rate shown is based on an 80‐hour per pay period. 106 Fiscal  Year 2018‐2019 Compensation Schedule Effective August 17, 2018 POSITION TITLE PCN BARG STEP BI‐WEEKLY RATE* SR ADMIN SEC 0145 CONF A $2,276.00 SR ADMIN SEC 0145 CONF B $2,389.79 SR ADMIN SEC 0145 CONF C $2,509.29 SR ADMIN SEC 0145 CONF D $2,634.74 SR ADMIN SEC 0145 CONF E $2,766.48 SR ADMIN SEC 0185 ACE A $2,276.00 SR ADMIN SEC 0185 ACE B $2,389.79 SR ADMIN SEC 0185 ACE C $2,509.29 SR ADMIN SEC 0185 ACE D $2,634.74 SR ADMIN SEC 0185 ACE E $2,766.48 SR ANML CR SPEC 5345 ACE A $1,726.48 SR ANML CR SPEC 5345 ACE B $1,812.81 SR ANML CR SPEC 5345 ACE C $1,903.44 SR ANML CR SPEC 5345 ACE D $1,998.62 SR ANML CR SPEC 5345 ACE E $2,098.55 SR APP SUP SPEC 3089 PROF A $3,068.71 SR APP SUP SPEC 3089 PROF B $3,222.14 SR APP SUP SPEC 3089 PROF C $3,383.25 SR APP SUP SPEC 3089 PROF D $3,552.42 SR APP SUP SPEC 3089 PROF E $3,730.03 SR ASST CTY ATT 2403 EXEC A $6,186.20 SR ASST CTY ATT 2403 EXEC B $0.00 SR ASST CTY ATT 2403 EXEC C $0.00 SR ASST CTY ATT 2403 EXEC D $0.00 SR ASST CTY ATT 2403 EXEC E $7,519.36 SR BLDG INSP 4781 ACE A $3,022.37 SR BLDG INSP 4781 ACE B $3,173.50 SR BLDG INSP 4781 ACE C $3,332.18 SR BLDG INSP 4781 ACE D $3,498.78 SR BLDG INSP 4781 ACE E $3,673.71 SR BUS LIC REP 4507 ACE A $1,925.45 SR BUS LIC REP 4507 ACE B $2,021.73 SR BUS LIC REP 4507 ACE C $2,122.82 SR BUS LIC REP 4507 ACE D $2,228.97 SR BUS LIC REP 4507 ACE E $2,340.41 SR CIVIL ENG 6019 WCE A $3,791.17 SR CIVIL ENG 6019 WCE B $3,980.71 SR CIVIL ENG 6019 WCE C $4,179.77 SR CIVIL ENG 6019 WCE D $4,388.75 SR CIVIL ENG 6019 WCE E $4,608.18 SR CODE ENF OFF 4763 ACE A $2,887.78 SR CODE ENF OFF 4763 ACE B $3,032.18 SR CODE ENF OFF 4763 ACE C $3,183.79 SR CODE ENF OFF 4763 ACE D $3,342.97 SR CODE ENF OFF 4763 ACE E $3,510.13 Approved and Adopted:  Resolution No.:  * Bi‐weekly rate shown is based on an 80‐hour per pay period. 107 Fiscal  Year 2018‐2019 Compensation Schedule Effective August 17, 2018 POSITION TITLE PCN BARG STEP BI‐WEEKLY RATE* SR CODE ENF OFF 4764 UCHR A $2,887.78 SR CODE ENF OFF 4764 UCHR B $3,032.18 SR CODE ENF OFF 4764 UCHR C $3,183.78 SR CODE ENF OFF 4764 UCHR D $3,342.98 SR CODE ENF OFF 4764 UCHR E $3,510.13 SR COUNCIL ASST 2025 UCHR A $2,139.77 SR COUNCIL ASST 2025 UCHR B $2,246.76 SR COUNCIL ASST 2025 UCHR C $2,359.09 SR COUNCIL ASST 2025 UCHR D $2,477.03 SR COUNCIL ASST 2025 UCHR E $2,600.90 SR COUNCIL ASST 2027 CONF A $1,776.62 SR COUNCIL ASST 2027 CONF B $1,865.44 SR COUNCIL ASST 2027 CONF C $1,958.71 SR COUNCIL ASST 2027 CONF D $2,056.65 SR COUNCIL ASST 2027 CONF E $2,159.48 SR DEP CITY CLK 2208 PRUC A $2,625.55 SR DEP CITY CLK 2208 PRUC B $2,756.83 SR DEP CITY CLK 2208 PRUC C $2,894.67 SR DEP CITY CLK 2208 PRUC D $3,039.41 SR DEP CITY CLK 2208 PRUC E $3,191.38 SR ECON DEV SPC 2725 PROF A $3,039.79 SR ECON DEV SPC 2725 PROF B $3,191.78 SR ECON DEV SPC 2725 PROF C $3,351.37 SR ECON DEV SPC 2725 PROF D $3,518.94 SR ECON DEV SPC 2725 PROF E $3,694.89 SR ELEC TECH 6471 ACE A $2,769.33 SR ELEC TECH 6471 ACE B $2,907.80 SR ELEC TECH 6471 ACE C $3,053.19 SR ELEC TECH 6471 ACE D $3,205.85 SR ELEC TECH 6471 ACE E $3,366.13 SR ELECTRICIAN 6442 ACE A $2,517.52 SR ELECTRICIAN 6442 ACE B $2,643.40 SR ELECTRICIAN 6442 ACE C $2,775.56 SR ELECTRICIAN 6442 ACE D $2,914.33 SR ELECTRICIAN 6442 ACE E $3,060.05 SR ENG TECH 6059 ACE A $2,628.16 SR ENG TECH 6059 ACE B $2,759.57 SR ENG TECH 6059 ACE C $2,897.54 SR ENG TECH 6059 ACE D $3,042.43 SR ENG TECH 6059 ACE E $3,194.55 SR EQUIP MECH 6512 ACE A $2,375.66 SR EQUIP MECH 6512 ACE B $2,494.44 SR EQUIP MECH 6512 ACE C $2,619.17 SR EQUIP MECH 6512 ACE D $2,750.11 SR EQUIP MECH 6512 ACE E $2,887.62 Approved and Adopted:  Resolution No.:  * Bi‐weekly rate shown is based on an 80‐hour per pay period. 108 Fiscal  Year 2018‐2019 Compensation Schedule Effective August 17, 2018 POSITION TITLE PCN BARG STEP BI‐WEEKLY RATE* SR FIRE INS/INV 5529 IAFF A $3,066.75 SR FIRE INS/INV 5529 IAFF B $3,220.09 SR FIRE INS/INV 5529 IAFF C $3,381.10 SR FIRE INS/INV 5529 IAFF D $3,550.16 SR FIRE INS/INV 5529 IAFF E $3,727.66 SR FSCL OF SPEC 0141 CONF A $1,701.45 SR FSCL OF SPEC 0141 CONF B $1,786.52 SR FSCL OF SPEC 0141 CONF C $1,875.85 SR FSCL OF SPEC 0141 CONF D $1,969.64 SR FSCL OF SPEC 0141 CONF E $2,068.13 SR FSCL OF SPEC 0175 ACE A $1,701.45 SR FSCL OF SPEC 0175 ACE B $1,786.52 SR FSCL OF SPEC 0175 ACE C $1,875.85 SR FSCL OF SPEC 0175 ACE D $1,969.64 SR FSCL OF SPEC 0175 ACE E $2,068.13 SR FSCL OF SPEC 0176 UCHR A $1,701.45 SR FSCL OF SPEC 0176 UCHR B $1,786.53 SR FSCL OF SPEC 0176 UCHR C $1,875.86 SR FSCL OF SPEC 0176 UCHR D $1,969.65 SR FSCL OF SPEC 0176 UCHR E $2,068.14 SR GARDENER 6621 ACE A $1,998.76 SR GARDENER 6621 ACE B $2,098.70 SR GARDENER 6621 ACE C $2,203.64 SR GARDENER 6621 ACE D $2,313.83 SR GARDENER 6621 ACE E $2,429.51 SR GIS SPEC 3080 ACE A $2,717.22 SR GIS SPEC 3080 ACE B $2,853.09 SR GIS SPEC 3080 ACE C $2,995.74 SR GIS SPEC 3080 ACE D $3,145.53 SR GIS SPEC 3080 ACE E $3,302.80 SR GRPHC DESGR 2764 PROF A $2,747.38 SR GRPHC DESGR 2764 PROF B $2,884.74 SR GRPHC DESGR 2764 PROF C $3,028.98 SR GRPHC DESGR 2764 PROF D $3,180.43 SR GRPHC DESGR 2764 PROF E $3,339.46 SR HR ANALYST 3308 PRCF A $3,051.10 SR HR ANALYST 3308 PRCF B $3,203.66 SR HR ANALYST 3308 PRCF C $3,363.84 SR HR ANALYST 3308 PRCF D $3,532.03 SR HR ANALYST 3308 PRCF E $3,708.63 SR HR ANALYST 3313 UCHR A $3,051.10 SR HR ANALYST 3313 UCHR B $3,203.65 SR HR ANALYST 3313 UCHR C $3,363.84 SR HR ANALYST 3313 UCHR D $3,532.03 SR HR ANALYST 3313 UCHR E $3,708.63 Approved and Adopted:  Resolution No.:  * Bi‐weekly rate shown is based on an 80‐hour per pay period. 109 Fiscal  Year 2018‐2019 Compensation Schedule Effective August 17, 2018 POSITION TITLE PCN BARG STEP BI‐WEEKLY RATE* SR HR TECH 3316 CONF A $2,260.72 SR HR TECH 3316 CONF B $2,373.75 SR HR TECH 3316 CONF C $2,492.44 SR HR TECH 3316 CONF D $2,617.08 SR HR TECH 3316 CONF E $2,747.92 SR HVAC TECH 6441 ACE A $2,517.52 SR HVAC TECH 6441 ACE B $2,643.40 SR HVAC TECH 6441 ACE C $2,775.56 SR HVAC TECH 6441 ACE D $2,914.33 SR HVAC TECH 6441 ACE E $3,060.05 SR IT SUPP SPEC 3012 PROF A $3,068.71 SR IT SUPP SPEC 3012 PROF B $3,222.14 SR IT SUPP SPEC 3012 PROF C $3,383.25 SR IT SUPP SPEC 3012 PROF D $3,552.42 SR IT SUPP SPEC 3012 PROF E $3,730.03 SR LAND SRVYR 6285 WCE A $3,791.17 SR LAND SRVYR 6285 WCE B $3,980.71 SR LAND SRVYR 6285 WCE C $4,179.77 SR LAND SRVYR 6285 WCE D $4,388.75 SR LAND SRVYR 6285 WCE E $4,608.18 SR LEGAL ASST 2463 CONF A $2,298.53 SR LEGAL ASST 2463 CONF B $2,413.45 SR LEGAL ASST 2463 CONF C $2,534.13 SR LEGAL ASST 2463 CONF D $2,660.83 SR LEGAL ASST 2463 CONF E $2,793.88 SR LIBRARIAN 7053 MM A $2,623.98 SR LIBRARIAN 7053 MM B $2,755.18 SR LIBRARIAN 7053 MM C $2,892.94 SR LIBRARIAN 7053 MM D $3,037.59 SR LIBRARIAN 7053 MM E $3,189.47 SR LIFEGUARD 7589 UCHR A $1,337.40 SR LIFEGUARD 7589 UCHR B $1,404.27 SR LIFEGUARD 7589 UCHR C $1,474.48 SR LIFEGUARD 7589 UCHR D $1,548.21 SR LIFEGUARD 7589 UCHR E $1,625.62 SR LNDSCPE INSP 6295 ACE A $2,747.63 SR LNDSCPE INSP 6295 ACE B $2,885.01 SR LNDSCPE INSP 6295 ACE C $3,029.25 SR LNDSCPE INSP 6295 ACE D $3,180.71 SR LNDSCPE INSP 6295 ACE E $3,339.75 SR LTNT PRT EXM 5110 ACE A $3,244.05 SR LTNT PRT EXM 5110 ACE B $3,406.26 SR LTNT PRT EXM 5110 ACE C $3,576.57 SR LTNT PRT EXM 5110 ACE D $3,755.40 SR LTNT PRT EXM 5110 ACE E $3,943.17 Approved and Adopted:  Resolution No.:  * Bi‐weekly rate shown is based on an 80‐hour per pay period. 110 Fiscal  Year 2018‐2019 Compensation Schedule Effective August 17, 2018 POSITION TITLE PCN BARG STEP BI‐WEEKLY RATE* SR MAINT WKR 6371 ACE A $1,998.76 SR MAINT WKR 6371 ACE B $2,098.70 SR MAINT WKR 6371 ACE C $2,203.64 SR MAINT WKR 6371 ACE D $2,313.83 SR MAINT WKR 6371 ACE E $2,429.51 SR MGMT ANALYST 0206 PROF A $2,868.15 SR MGMT ANALYST 0206 PROF B $3,011.56 SR MGMT ANALYST 0206 PROF C $3,162.13 SR MGMT ANALYST 0206 PROF D $3,320.24 SR MGMT ANALYST 0206 PROF E $3,486.26 SR OFFICE SPEC 0173 ACE A $1,620.43 SR OFFICE SPEC 0173 ACE B $1,701.46 SR OFFICE SPEC 0173 ACE C $1,786.53 SR OFFICE SPEC 0173 ACE D $1,875.86 SR OFFICE SPEC 0173 ACE E $1,969.64 SR OS INSP 6309 ACE A $2,747.64 SR OS INSP 6309 ACE B $2,885.02 SR OS INSP 6309 ACE C $3,029.26 SR OS INSP 6309 ACE D $3,180.72 SR OS INSP 6309 ACE E $3,339.76 SR P&E SPEC 5125 ACE A $1,883.45 SR P&E SPEC 5125 ACE B $1,977.63 SR P&E SPEC 5125 ACE C $2,076.51 SR P&E SPEC 5125 ACE D $2,180.32 SR P&E SPEC 5125 ACE E $2,289.35 SR PARK RANGER 7439 ACE A $1,998.76 SR PARK RANGER 7439 ACE B $2,098.70 SR PARK RANGER 7439 ACE C $2,203.64 SR PARK RANGER 7439 ACE D $2,313.83 SR PARK RANGER 7439 ACE E $2,429.51 SR PGMMR ANLYST 3091 PROF A $3,158.03 SR PGMMR ANLYST 3091 PROF B $3,315.94 SR PGMMR ANLYST 3091 PROF C $3,481.73 SR PGMMR ANLYST 3091 PROF D $3,655.81 SR PGMMR ANLYST 3091 PROF E $3,838.61 SR PLAN CK ENG 4746 WCE A $3,626.33 SR PLAN CK ENG 4746 WCE B $3,807.67 SR PLAN CK ENG 4746 WCE C $3,998.04 SR PLAN CK ENG 4746 WCE D $4,197.94 SR PLAN CK ENG 4746 WCE E $4,407.84 SR PLAN CK TECH 4751 ACE A $2,628.16 SR PLAN CK TECH 4751 ACE B $2,759.57 SR PLAN CK TECH 4751 ACE C $2,897.54 SR PLAN CK TECH 4751 ACE D $3,042.43 SR PLAN CK TECH 4751 ACE E $3,194.55 Approved and Adopted:  Resolution No.:  * Bi‐weekly rate shown is based on an 80‐hour per pay period. 111 Fiscal  Year 2018‐2019 Compensation Schedule Effective August 17, 2018 POSITION TITLE PCN BARG STEP BI‐WEEKLY RATE* SR PLANNER 4432 PROF A $3,039.79 SR PLANNER 4432 PROF B $3,191.78 SR PLANNER 4432 PROF C $3,351.37 SR PLANNER 4432 PROF D $3,518.94 SR PLANNER 4432 PROF E $3,694.89 SR PLNNING TECH 4529 ACE A $2,159.41 SR PLNNING TECH 4529 ACE B $2,267.39 SR PLNNING TECH 4529 ACE C $2,380.76 SR PLNNING TECH 4529 ACE D $2,499.79 SR PLNNING TECH 4529 ACE E $2,624.79 SR POL RCD SPEC 0135 ACE A $1,694.11 SR POL RCD SPEC 0135 ACE B $1,778.81 SR POL RCD SPEC 0135 ACE C $1,867.74 SR POL RCD SPEC 0135 ACE D $1,961.13 SR POL RCD SPEC 0135 ACE E $2,059.19 SR POL TEC SPEC 5109 PROF A $3,336.52 SR POL TEC SPEC 5109 PROF B $3,503.34 SR POL TEC SPEC 5109 PROF C $3,678.52 SR POL TEC SPEC 5109 PROF D $3,862.44 SR POL TEC SPEC 5109 PROF E $4,055.56 SR PROC SPEC 3728 PROF A $2,493.44 SR PROC SPEC 3728 PROF B $2,618.11 SR PROC SPEC 3728 PROF C $2,749.01 SR PROC SPEC 3728 PROF D $2,886.47 SR PROC SPEC 3728 PROF E $3,030.79 SR PROJECT COOR 4214 PROF A $3,039.79 SR PROJECT COOR 4214 PROF B $3,191.78 SR PROJECT COOR 4214 PROF C $3,351.37 SR PROJECT COOR 4214 PROF D $3,518.94 SR PROJECT COOR 4214 PROF E $3,694.89 SR PS ANALYST 5260 PROF A $2,746.69 SR PS ANALYST 5260 PROF B $2,884.02 SR PS ANALYST 5260 PROF C $3,028.22 SR PS ANALYST 5260 PROF D $3,179.64 SR PS ANALYST 5260 PROF E $3,338.61 SR PW INSP 6101 ACE A $3,022.38 SR PW INSP 6101 ACE B $3,173.51 SR PW INSP 6101 ACE C $3,332.19 SR PW INSP 6101 ACE D $3,498.79 SR PW INSP 6101 ACE E $3,673.72 SR PW SPEC 6702 ACE A $2,285.35 SR PW SPEC 6702 ACE B $2,399.62 SR PW SPEC 6702 ACE C $2,519.60 SR PW SPEC 6702 ACE D $2,645.58 SR PW SPEC 6702 ACE E $2,777.86 Approved and Adopted:  Resolution No.:  * Bi‐weekly rate shown is based on an 80‐hour per pay period. 112 Fiscal  Year 2018‐2019 Compensation Schedule Effective August 17, 2018 POSITION TITLE PCN BARG STEP BI‐WEEKLY RATE* SR RECORDS SPEC 2215 ACE A $1,863.50 SR RECORDS SPEC 2215 ACE B $1,956.68 SR RECORDS SPEC 2215 ACE C $2,054.50 SR RECORDS SPEC 2215 ACE D $2,157.24 SR RECORDS SPEC 2215 ACE E $2,265.10 SR RSK MGT SPEC 3365 PRCF A $3,051.10 SR RSK MGT SPEC 3365 PRCF B $3,203.66 SR RSK MGT SPEC 3365 PRCF C $3,363.84 SR RSK MGT SPEC 3365 PRCF D $3,532.03 SR RSK MGT SPEC 3365 PRCF E $3,708.63 SR SECRETARY 0139 CONF A $1,782.48 SR SECRETARY 0139 CONF B $1,871.61 SR SECRETARY 0139 CONF C $1,965.19 SR SECRETARY 0139 CONF D $2,063.45 SR SECRETARY 0139 CONF E $2,166.62 SR SECRETARY 0177 ACE A $1,782.48 SR SECRETARY 0177 ACE B $1,871.61 SR SECRETARY 0177 ACE C $1,965.19 SR SECRETARY 0177 ACE D $2,063.45 SR SECRETARY 0177 ACE E $2,166.62 SR TREE TRIMMER 6573 ACE A $2,198.64 SR TREE TRIMMER 6573 ACE B $2,308.57 SR TREE TRIMMER 6573 ACE C $2,424.00 SR TREE TRIMMER 6573 ACE D $2,545.20 SR TREE TRIMMER 6573 ACE E $2,672.45 SR WEBMASTER 2779 PROF A $2,757.45 SR WEBMASTER 2779 PROF B $2,895.32 SR WEBMASTER 2779 PROF C $3,040.09 SR WEBMASTER 2779 PROF D $3,192.10 SR WEBMASTER 2779 PROF E $3,351.70 STKPR SUP 3732 ACE A $1,998.76 STKPR SUP 3732 ACE B $2,098.70 STKPR SUP 3732 ACE C $2,203.64 STKPR SUP 3732 ACE D $2,313.83 STKPR SUP 3732 ACE E $2,429.51 STMWR CP INS I 6127 ACE A $2,172.03 STMWR CP INS I 6127 ACE B $2,280.63 STMWR CP INS I 6127 ACE C $2,394.66 STMWR CP INS I 6127 ACE D $2,514.40 STMWR CP INS I 6127 ACE E $2,640.11 STMWR CP INS II 6125 ACE A $2,389.25 STMWR CP INS II 6125 ACE B $2,508.70 STMWR CP INS II 6125 ACE C $2,634.15 STMWR CP INS II 6125 ACE D $2,765.84 STMWR CP INS II 6125 ACE E $2,904.14 Approved and Adopted:  Resolution No.:  * Bi‐weekly rate shown is based on an 80‐hour per pay period. 113 Fiscal  Year 2018‐2019 Compensation Schedule Effective August 17, 2018 POSITION TITLE PCN BARG STEP BI‐WEEKLY RATE* STMWR EN SPC I 6137 ACE A $2,497.84 STMWR EN SPC I 6137 ACE B $2,622.74 STMWR EN SPC I 6137 ACE C $2,753.87 STMWR EN SPC I 6137 ACE D $2,891.57 STMWR EN SPC I 6137 ACE E $3,036.15 STMWR EN SPC II 6137 ACE A $2,747.64 STMWR EN SPC II 6137 ACE B $2,885.02 STMWR EN SPC II 6137 ACE C $3,029.26 STMWR EN SPC II 6137 ACE D $3,180.72 STMWR EN SPC II 6137 ACE E $3,339.76 STMWR PG MGR 6131 MM A $3,393.62 STMWR PG MGR 6131 MM B $3,563.30 STMWR PG MGR 6131 MM C $3,741.47 STMWR PG MGR 6131 MM D $3,928.54 STMWR PG MGR 6131 MM E $4,124.97 STOREKEEPER 3734 ACE A $1,665.64 STOREKEEPER 3734 ACE B $1,748.91 STOREKEEPER 3734 ACE C $1,836.37 STOREKEEPER 3734 ACE D $1,928.19 STOREKEEPER 3734 ACE E $2,024.60 SUPV PS ANALYST 5241 MM A $3,158.69 SUPV PS ANALYST 5241 MM B $3,316.62 SUPV PS ANALYST 5241 MM C $3,482.45 SUPV PS ANALYST 5241 MM D $3,656.58 SUPV PS ANALYST 5241 MM E $3,839.40 SURVEY TECH I 6151 ACE A $2,077.60 SURVEY TECH I 6151 ACE B $2,181.47 SURVEY TECH I 6151 ACE C $2,290.54 SURVEY TECH I 6151 ACE D $2,405.07 SURVEY TECH I 6151 ACE E $2,525.33 SURVEY TECH II 6141 ACE A $2,285.35 SURVEY TECH II 6141 ACE B $2,399.62 SURVEY TECH II 6141 ACE C $2,519.60 SURVEY TECH II 6141 ACE D $2,645.58 SURVEY TECH II 6141 ACE E $2,777.86 SYS/DB ADMIN 3015 PROF A $3,068.45 SYS/DB ADMIN 3015 PROF B $3,221.87 SYS/DB ADMIN 3015 PROF C $3,382.96 SYS/DB ADMIN 3015 PROF D $3,552.11 SYS/DB ADMIN 3015 PROF E $3,729.72 TELECOM SPEC 3027 ACE A $1,922.75 TELECOM SPEC 3027 ACE B $2,018.89 TELECOM SPEC 3027 ACE C $2,119.83 TELECOM SPEC 3027 ACE D $2,225.82 TELECOM SPEC 3027 ACE E $2,337.12 Approved and Adopted:  Resolution No.:  * Bi‐weekly rate shown is based on an 80‐hour per pay period. 114 Fiscal  Year 2018‐2019 Compensation Schedule Effective August 17, 2018 POSITION TITLE PCN BARG STEP BI‐WEEKLY RATE* TINY TOT AIDE 7503 UCHR A $1,053.72 TINY TOT AIDE 7503 UCHR B $1,106.40 TINY TOT AIDE 7503 UCHR C $1,161.72 TINY TOT AIDE 7503 UCHR D $1,219.81 TINY TOT AIDE 7503 UCHR E $1,280.80 TINY TOT SPEC 7505 UCHR A $1,264.33 TINY TOT SPEC 7505 UCHR B $1,327.55 TINY TOT SPEC 7505 UCHR C $1,393.92 TINY TOT SPEC 7505 UCHR D $1,463.62 TINY TOT SPEC 7505 UCHR E $1,536.80 TRAFF CTRL ASST 5155 UCHR A $0.00 TRAFF CTRL ASST 5155 UCHR B $0.00 TRAFF CTRL ASST 5155 UCHR C $0.00 TRAFF CTRL ASST 5155 UCHR D $0.00 TRAFF CTRL ASST 5155 UCHR E $1,255.20 TRAFF DV TCH 6177 ACE A $2,408.12 TRAFF DV TCH 6177 ACE B $2,528.52 TRAFF DV TCH 6177 ACE C $2,654.95 TRAFF DV TCH 6177 ACE D $2,787.69 TRAFF DV TCH 6177 ACE E $2,927.08 TRAFF DV TCH SP 6175 ACE A $2,769.33 TRAFF DV TCH SP 6175 ACE B $2,907.80 TRAFF DV TCH SP 6175 ACE C $3,053.19 TRAFF DV TCH SP 6175 ACE D $3,205.85 TRAFF DV TCH SP 6175 ACE E $3,366.13 TRAFF ENGINEER 6024 PROF A $3,172.43 TRAFF ENGINEER 6024 PROF B $3,331.05 TRAFF ENGINEER 6024 PROF C $3,497.61 TRAFF ENGINEER 6024 PROF D $3,672.49 TRAFF ENGINEER 6024 PROF E $3,856.12 TRAFF OFFICER 5293 UCHR A $1,139.42 TRAFF OFFICER 5293 UCHR B $1,195.84 TRAFF OFFICER 5293 UCHR C $1,255.53 TRAFF OFFICER 5293 UCHR D $0.00 TRAFF OFFICER 5293 UCHR E $0.00 TRAIN PGM SPEC 5250 UCHR A $1,922.58 TRAIN PGM SPEC 5250 UCHR B $2,018.70 TRAIN PGM SPEC 5250 UCHR C $2,119.63 TRAIN PGM SPEC 5250 UCHR D $2,225.62 TRAIN PGM SPEC 5250 UCHR E $2,336.90 TRAIN PGM SPEC 5262 ACE A $1,922.58 TRAIN PGM SPEC 5262 ACE B $2,018.70 TRAIN PGM SPEC 5262 ACE C $2,119.64 TRAIN PGM SPEC 5262 ACE D $2,225.62 TRAIN PGM SPEC 5262 ACE E $2,336.90 Approved and Adopted:  Resolution No.:  * Bi‐weekly rate shown is based on an 80‐hour per pay period. 115 Fiscal  Year 2018‐2019 Compensation Schedule Effective August 17, 2018 POSITION TITLE PCN BARG STEP BI‐WEEKLY RATE* TRAN ENG W CERT 6031 WCE A $3,791.17 TRAN ENG W CERT 6031 WCE B $3,980.71 TRAN ENG W CERT 6031 WCE C $4,179.77 TRAN ENG W CERT 6031 WCE D $4,388.75 TRAN ENG W CERT 6031 WCE E $4,608.18 TRAN ENG WO CRT 6033 WCE A $3,610.64 TRAN ENG WO CRT 6033 WCE B $3,791.17 TRAN ENG WO CRT 6033 WCE C $3,980.72 TRAN ENG WO CRT 6033 WCE D $4,179.77 TRAN ENG WO CRT 6033 WCE E $4,388.75 TREE TRMR 6575 ACE A $1,832.21 TREE TRMR 6575 ACE B $1,923.81 TREE TRMR 6575 ACE C $2,020.00 TREE TRMR 6575 ACE D $2,120.99 TREE TRMR 6575 ACE E $2,227.05 TREE TRMR SUPV 6572 ACE A $2,528.45 TREE TRMR SUPV 6572 ACE B $2,654.88 TREE TRMR SUPV 6572 ACE C $2,787.61 TREE TRMR SUPV 6572 ACE D $2,926.98 TREE TRMR SUPV 6572 ACE E $3,073.34 VET 5308 UCHR A $3,741.96 VET 5308 UCHR B $3,929.06 VET 5308 UCHR C $4,125.51 VET 5308 UCHR D $4,331.78 VET 5308 UCHR E $4,548.37 VET (PERMITTED) 5322 UCHR A $5,290.73 VET (PERMITTED) 5322 UCHR B $5,555.27 VET (PERMITTED) 5322 UCHR C $5,833.03 VET (PERMITTED) 5322 UCHR D $6,124.68 VET (PERMITTED) 5322 UCHR E $6,430.92 VET (PERMITTED) 5331 PROF A $4,385.24 VET (PERMITTED) 5331 PROF B $4,604.49 VET (PERMITTED) 5331 PROF C $4,834.72 VET (PERMITTED) 5331 PROF D $5,076.46 VET (PERMITTED) 5331 PROF E $5,330.29 VET ASST 5323 UCHR A $1,501.30 VET ASST 5323 UCHR B $1,576.37 VET ASST 5323 UCHR C $1,655.18 VET ASST 5323 UCHR D $1,737.95 VET ASST 5323 UCHR E $1,824.85 VET ASST 5325 ACE A $1,501.30 VET ASST 5325 ACE B $1,576.36 VET ASST 5325 ACE C $1,655.18 VET ASST 5325 ACE D $1,737.95 VET ASST 5325 ACE E $1,824.84 Approved and Adopted:  Resolution No.:  * Bi‐weekly rate shown is based on an 80‐hour per pay period. 116 Fiscal  Year 2018‐2019 Compensation Schedule Effective August 17, 2018 POSITION TITLE PCN BARG STEP BI‐WEEKLY RATE* VET I 5335 PROF A $3,114.52 VET I 5335 PROF B $3,270.24 VET I 5335 PROF C $3,433.76 VET I 5335 PROF D $3,605.45 VET I 5335 PROF E $3,785.71 VET II 5333 PROF A $3,581.69 VET II 5333 PROF B $3,760.77 VET II 5333 PROF C $3,948.81 VET II 5333 PROF D $4,146.25 VET II 5333 PROF E $4,353.56 VOL COORD 7131 ACE A $1,641.16 VOL COORD 7131 ACE B $1,723.22 VOL COORD 7131 ACE C $1,809.38 VOL COORD 7131 ACE D $1,899.84 VOL COORD 7131 ACE E $1,994.83 WEBMASTER 2777 ACE A $2,470.21 WEBMASTER 2777 ACE B $2,593.71 WEBMASTER 2777 ACE C $2,723.40 WEBMASTER 2777 ACE D $2,859.56 WEBMASTER 2777 ACE E $3,002.54 WW/STRM OPS MGR 6332 MM A $3,707.04 WW/STRM OPS MGR 6332 MM B $3,892.39 WW/STRM OPS MGR 6332 MM C $4,087.01 WW/STRM OPS MGR 6332 MM D $4,291.36 WW/STRM OPS MGR 6332 MM E $4,505.93 Revised: August 7, 2018 (Effective August 7, 2018) Approved and Adopted:  Resolution No.:  * Bi‐weekly rate shown is based on an 80‐hour per pay period. 117 SECOND READING AND ADOPTION ORDINANCE NO. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 2.05.010 TO DELETE THE UNCLASSIFIED POSITION OF CONSTITUENT SERVICES REPRESENTATIVE (FIRST READING) (4/5 VOTE REQUIRED) WHEREAS, the Human Resources Department has created new classifications to better reflect the needs of the City’s workforce; and WHEREAS, Chula Vista City Charter Section 500(a) requires that all new unclassified management level positions be adopted by ordinance and a four-fifths vote of the Council. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does ordain as follows: Section I.That Section 2.05.010 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 2.05.10 Unclassified positions established. In addition to those unclassified positions specifically delineated in Section 500 of the Charter of the City, there are established the unclassified positions entitled: Administrative Secretary (Mayor, At Will), Administrative Services Manager, Animal Care Facility Administrator, Animal Care Facility Manager, Assistant Chief of Police, Assistant Director of Development Services, Assistant Director of Engineering, Assistant Director of Human Resources, Assistant Director of Finance, Assistant Director of Public Works, Assistant Director of Recreation, Budget and Analysis Manager, Building Official/Code Enforcement Manager, Chief of Staff, Chief Sustainability Officer, City Engineer, City Librarian, Constituent Services Manager, Constituent Services Representative, Deputy City Manager, Deputy Fire Chief, Development Services Department Director, Director of Community Services, Director of Conservation and Environmental Services, Director of Economic Development, Fire Division Chief, FA Accounting Technician, FA Administrative Analyst I, FA Administrative Analyst II, FA Analyst, FA Deputy Executive Director, FA Executive Director, FA Public Private Partnership and Exercise Program Manager, FA Director of San Diego Law Enforcement Coordination Center, FA Executive Assistant, FA Financial Manager, FA Geospatial Intelligence Analyst, FA Graphics Designer/Webmaster, FA Information Security Program Manager, FA IVDC-LECC Executive Director, FA Law Enforcement Coordination Center Information Technology Manager, FA Intelligence Analyst, FA Management Assistant, FA Microcomputer Specialist, FA Network Administrator I, FA Network Administrator II, FA Program Analyst, FA Program Assistant Supervisor, FA Program Manager, FA Network Engineer, FA Senior Financial Analyst, FA Senior Intelligence Analyst, FA Senior Program Assistant, FA Senior Secretary, FA Supervisory Intelligence Analyst, Finance and Purchasing Manager, Housing Manager, Human Resources Operations Manager, Information Technology Manager, Law Office Manager, Office Specialist (Mayor’s Office), Parks and Recreation Administrator, Performance and Organizational Development Manager, Planning Manager, Police Administrative Services Administrator, Police Captain, Policy Aide, Public Works Superintendent, Purchasing Agent, 118 Ordinance No. Page No. 2 Real Property Manager, Redevelopment and Housing Manager, Revenue Manager, Risk Manager, Senior Council Assistant, and Traffic Engineer. Section II. Severability If any portion of this Ordinance, or its application to any person or circumstance, is for any reason held to be invalid, unenforceable or unconstitutional, by a court of competent jurisdiction, that portion shall be deemed severable, and such invalidity, unenforceability or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining portions of the Ordinance, or its application to any other person or circumstance. The City Council of the City of Chula Vista hereby declares that it would have adopted each section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance, irrespective of the fact that any one or more other sections, sentences, clauses or phrases of the Ordinance be declared invalid, unenforceable or unconstitutional. Section III. Construction The City Council of the City of Chula Vista intends this Ordinance to supplement, not to duplicate or contradict, applicable state and federal law and this Ordinance shall be construed in light of that intent. Section IV. Effective Date This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force on the thirtieth day after its final passage. Section V. Publication The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published or posted according to law. Presented by Approved as to form by Courtney Chase Glen R. Googins Director of Human Resources City Attorney 119 P a g e | 1 August 14, 2018 File ID: 18-0335 18-0384 TITLE ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ADDING CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 2.63 - “MEASURE A” CITIZENS’ OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE (FIRST READING) RECOMMENDED ACTION Council place the ordinance on first reading. SUMMARY On June 5, 2018, the City’s electorate approved the passage of Measure A, which implemented a one-half cent general transactions and use tax. Measure A also required the ordinance creating a citizens’ oversight committee be adopted by the City Council no later than 150 days following the date of the election at which Measure A was approved by the voters. The ordinance presented would establish that committee, in accordance with Measure A. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Director of Development Services has reviewed the proposed activity for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that this activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines because it will not result in a physical change to the environment; therefore, pursuant to Section 15060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Thus, no environmental review is required. BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION Not applicable. DISCUSSION On June 5, 2018, the City of Chula Vista submitted to the voters a measure to approve an ordinance enacting a one-half cent general transactions and use tax, including provisions for citizens’ oversight, separate accounting, and independent audits (“Measure A”). The voters approved the passage of Measure A, which resulted in the adoption of Ordinance No. 3415 (“Ordinance 3415”). Ordinance 3415 enacted the general transaction and use tax, required the implementation of the oversight, accounting and audit provisions. Ordinance 3415 specifically required the establishment of a Citizens’ Oversight Committee 120 P a g e | 2 (“COC”), by ordinance, no later than 150 days from the date of the election at which Measure A was approved by the voters. Ordinance 3415 provided that the COC would function to review and report on City compliance with the terms of Ordinance 3415 as follows: (i) public review and report on each year’s City Council Intended Public Safety Expenditure Plan, Measure A Spending Plan, and Auditors Report; and (ii) preparation of an annual report regarding same for presentation to the City Council at a public meeting. It also set forth the following regarding the COC (i) the members would be appointed by the City Council in accordance with existing City policies and (ii) the meetings would be conducted in accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act. In accordance with Measure A and Ordinance 3415 (codified as Chula Vista Municipal Code Chapter 3.34), City staff has prepared a draft ordinance to add Chapter 2.63 to the Chula Vista Municipal Code. The proposed ordinance creates the COC and sets forth the terms for its composition and operations. Staff’s intent with this proposal is to create a committee that: (1) has full authority to monitor City compliance with Measure A, (2) is comprised of a wide range of individuals that are representative of the community and (3) operates openly and effectively in accordance with existing City policies and the Brown Act. The primary provisions of the proposed ordinance are summarized below: Function: The stated function of the COC is to review and report on City compliance with the provisions of Measure A. Duties: The ordinance details the specific duties that the COC is to carry-out; these duties include: o (i) review and comment on the Finance Department Report, Measure A Spending Plan and Independent Audit (all of which are required to be prepared annually under Ordinance 3415); o (ii) make determinations as necessary and appropriate regarding City compliance with Measure A requirements; o (iii) work with City staff to identify and apply “best practices” for tracking and reporting Measure A revenues and expenditures relative to other Public Safety department revenues and expenditures. o (iv) prepare and present to City Council an annual report regarding its review of such documents. Authority Limited: The ordinance specifically provides that the COC is advisory in nature and would not have approval authority over any City action. Members: The COC would consist of nine (9) voting members, five of whom would be “designated members” and four of whom would be “at-large” members. Designated members would be nominated (one each) by the following Nominating Authorities: (i) the Chula Vista Chamber of Commerce; (ii) the Chula Vista Police Officers Association (POA); (iii) the Chula Vista International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF); (iv) the Growth Management Oversight Commission (from this commission); and (v) Association of Chula Vista Employees (ACE). At-large members would apply directly to the City Council, with the City Council appointing one from each of the four Council districts. 121 P a g e | 3 •Appointment Process: All members would be appointed by the City Council. Designated Members would first be nominated by the Nominating Authorities as provided above; those nominated would then submit applications. Up to three nominations for each Nominating Authority would be permitted, and if two or three are submitted the City Council must choose from among those two or three. At-Large members would submit applications directly to the City Clerk in accordance with the existing City appointment process where nominations, interviews and appointments are done by the full Council at a noticed public meeting. [See, Municipal Code Chapter 2.53 for details] •Terms: Per the City Charter, each COC member would be appointed for a term of four years, with a maximum tenure of two consecutive four- year terms. •Meetings: The COC would be required to meet as often as necessary to accomplish the objectives of Measure A. Meetings would be held in public in accordance with the Brown Act. It’s expected that at least 4 meetings a year will be required. •Staff support would be provided by the City Manager and/or his/her designee and the City Attorney and/or his/her designee. •Dissolution: The COC may be disbanded following the implementation of “Phase I” Critical Needs, as reported in the Intended Public Safety Expenditure Plan and (ii) if the City Council elects to disband the COC, the City’s Growth Management Oversight Commission, or an alternative citizens’ group or committee designated by the City Council, shall be responsible for reporting to the City Council, in a manner determined by the City Council, regarding the collections and expenditure of Measure A Revenues and the resulting impacts on public safety. Please refer to the full Ordinance, proposed new Chapter 2.63, attached, for further details. DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT Staff has reviewed the decision contemplated by this action and has determined that it is not site- specific and consequently, the 500-foot rule found in California Code of Regulations Title 2, section 18702.2(a)(11), is not applicable to this decision for purposes of determining a disqualifying real property-related financial conflict of interest under the Political Reform Act (Cal. Gov't Code § 87100, et seq.). Staff is not independently aware, and has not been informed by any City Councilmember, of any other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter. LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS The City’s Strategic Plan has five major goals: Operational Excellence, Economic Vitality, Healthy Community, Strong and Secure Neighborhoods and a Connected Community. This ordinance would serve these goals, in that, the ordinance is necessary to meet the requirements of the Measure passed by the voting community and forming the COC will assist in assuring that the tax revenues from Measure A will be expended in accordance with the Measure, thereby assisting the City in obtaining operational excellence and strong and secure neighborhoods with respect to the accounting and expenditure of the funds. 122 P a g e | 4 CURRENT-YEAR FISCAL IMPACT There will be no current year general fund impacts as a result of this item. All staff time to prepare for this item was included within the fiscal year 2018-19 adopted budget. ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT No anticipated future fiscal impact as a result of this action. All Measure A fiscal impacts will be taken as separate items to the City Council. ATTACHMENTS 1. Chula Vista Municipal Code Section 3.34 - Ordinance 3415 Staff Contact: Maria Kachadoorian, Assistant City Manager 123 ORDINANCE NO. ______ ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ADDING CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 2.63 – “MEASURE A” CITIZENS’ OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE WHEREAS, on June 5, 2018, the City of Chula Vista submitted to the voters a measure to approve an ordinance enacting a one-half cent general transactions and use tax, including provisions for citizens’ oversight, separate accounting, and independent audits (“Measure A”); and WHEREAS, the voters approved the passage of Measure A, thereby adopting Ordinance No. 3415 (“Ordinance 3415”), enacting the general transactions and use tax and requiring the implementation of the oversight, accounting and audit provisions; and WHEREAS, Ordinance 3415 specifically required the establishment of a Citizens’ Oversight Committee (“COC”), by ordinance, no later than 150 days following the date of the election at which Measure A is approved by the voters; and WHEREAS, Ordinance 3415 provided that the COC would function to: (i) consider the annual Finance Department report on Measure A revenues and expenditures; (ii) review and report on compliance with the terms of Ordinance 3415 and the City Council Intended Public Safety Expenditure Plan; (iii) and review and report on each year’s spending plan for Measure A revenues; and WHEREAS, Ordinance 3415 also set forth the following requirements for the COC members: (i) the members are to be appointed by the City Council in accordance with existing City policies and (iii) they shall conduct the meetings in accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act; and WHEREAS, Ordinance 3415 also set forth the following regarding the COC: (i) the COC may be disbanded following the implementation of “Phase I” Critical Needs, as reported in the Intended Public Safety Expenditure Plan and (ii) if the City Council elects to disband the COC, the City’s Growth Management Oversight Commission, or an alternative citizens’ group or committee designated by the City Council, shall be responsible for reporting to the City Council, in a manner determined by the City Council, regarding the collections and expenditure of Measure A Revenues and the resulting impacts on public safety; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Measure A and Ordinance 3415 (codified as Chula Vista Municipal Code Chapter 3.34), City staff has prepared a draft ordinance to add Chapter 2.63 to the Chula Vista Municipal Code, establishing rules and procedures for the Citizens’ Oversight Committee. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does ordain as follows: SECOND READING AND ADOPTION 124 Ordinance No. ______ Page No. 2 Section I. That Chapter 2.63 is hereby added to the Chula Vista Municipal Code, to read as follows: Chapter 2.63 “MEASURE A” CITIZENS’ OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE Sections: 2.63.010 Creation. 2.63.020 Function. 2.63.030 Specific Duties. 2.63.040 Limits on Authority 2.63.050 Composition; Qualifications; Nomination. 2.63.060 City Council Appointment. 2.63.070 Terms; Vacancies. 2.63.080 Meeting Schedule. 2.63.090 Operating Rules and Procedures 2.63.100 Staff Support. 2.63.110 Dissolution date. 2.63.010 Creation. There is hereby created the “Measure A Citizens’ Oversight Committee” (the “COC”). The COC is created for the purpose of providing citizens’ oversight in connection with expenditures of tax revenues generated by Measure A. Measure A is a one-half cent general transactions and use tax approved by the voters on June 5, 2018. Measure A is codified as CVMC Chapter 3.34. To the extent of any inconsistency between this ordinance and Measure A, the terms of Measure A shall govern. 2.63.020 Function. The function of the COC is to review and report on City compliance with the provisions of Measure A, particularly with respect to the City’s accounting and expenditure of Measure A revenues. 2.63.030 Specific Duties. The specific duties of the COC are as follows: A. Review and comment on each year’s: (1) “Finance Department Report” (as defined in CVMC Section 3.34.160.A); (2) “Measure A Spending Plan” (as defined in CVMC Section 3.34.160.B); and (3) Auditor Report (as described in CVMC Section 3.34.160.C). B. Make determinations as necessary and appropriate regarding City compliance with Measure A requirements. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION 125 Ordinance No. ______ Page No. 3 C. Work with City staff to identify and apply “best practices” for tracking and reporting on Measure A revenues and expenditures relative to other Public Safety department revenues and expenditures. D. Prepare an annual report regarding subsection A, B and C above, for presentation to the City Council at a public meeting. 2.63.040 Limits on Authority. Per Charter Section 600, the COC shall have no authority to direct the conduct of any department. The COC is advisory in nature, and as such shall have no authority to approve, disapprove or prevent any City action. 2.63.050 Composition; Qualifications; Nomination. A. Members. The COC shall be comprised of nineeleven (911) members, each with equal rights and standing to act and vote on COC matters. B. Qualifications Applicable to All Members. Per Charter Section 602(d), all COC members must be “qualified electors” of the City. A “qualified elector” of the City is a City resident that is qualified and registered to vote as a City resident. COC members must be “qualified electors” at the time they apply and must maintain such status throughout their tenure. C. Designated Members. FiveSeven of the total nineeleven (911) COC members shall be nominated, apply and serve as “designated members.” “Designated members” shall be nominated, one each, by the following nominating authorities (each a “Nominating Authority, collectively the “Nominating Authorities”), subject to the additional membership qualifications, if any, specified for each: (1) Chula Vista Chamber of Commerce; nominee(s) must be a member of the Chamber; (2) Chula Vista Police Officers Association (POA); nominee(s) must be an active member of this association; (3) Chula Vista International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF); nominee(s) must be an active member of this association; (4) Chula Vista Growth Management Oversight Commission; nominee(s) must be from this commission; (5) Association of Chula Vista Employee (ACE); nominee(s) must be an active member of this association. (6) Chula Vista Fire Chief (7) Chula Vista Police Chief SECOND READING AND ADOPTION 126 Ordinance No. ______ Page No. 4 Designated members shall be selected for nomination by the Nominating Authorities in accordance with policies and procedures that each Nominating Authority establishes for itself. Up to three nominees may be presented for City Council consideration in accordance with the appointment process set forth in Section 2.63.060.A, below. If any of the listed Nominating Authorities decline to exercise their nominating authority in a timely fashion, or if any ceases to function or exist, that party’s nominating authority shall pass to a substantially similar organization selected by the City Council. D. At-Large Members. Four of the total nineeleven (911) COC members shall apply and serve as representatives of the City “at-large.” “At-large members” shall be comprised of one resident from each of the four City Council districts. Each must maintain his/her district residency throughout his/her tenure. At-large members shall apply to and be appointed by the City Council in accordance with the process set forth in Section 2.63.060.B, below. If re- districting occurs such that one or more at- large member no longer qualifies for his/her assigned district, he/she shall nonetheless be entitled to serve out the remainder of his/her term, with a qualified replacement to be appointed and seated for the succeeding term. 2.63.060 City Council Appointment. A. Designated Members. Designated members shall be appointed by the City Council as follows: Nominating Authorities shall submit the names and contact information for their nominee(s) (“Designated Nominees”) to the City Clerk on a form prescribed by the City Clerk. The City Clerk shall provide the Designated Nominees with instructions to complete and submit applications to the City Clerk within a specified time period. Completed applications timely received by the City Clerk shall be forwarded to the City Council. The City Council shall consider all applications received from the City Clerk and provide each nominated applicant an opportunity for an interview at a publicly noticed meeting. If a Nominating Authority presents the City Council with two or three nominees for consideration, and those nominees properly apply, the City Council shall make its appointment by choosing among the two or three nominees presented. If a Nominating Authority presents the City Council with only one nominee, the City Council may reject such nomination by majority vote and request an alternative submittal. Once rejected, a nominee may not be re-submitted for the term at issue, but may be submitted for consideration for future terms. B. At-large Members. At-large members shall be appointed in accordance with the procedures set forth in CVMC Section 2.53. C. Administration. The City Clerk shall administer the appointment process set forth above, including the development and publication of all necessary forms. The City Clerk shall have the authority to develop additional administrative policies and procedures to the extent necessary to implement the terms of this Chapter. 2.63.070 Terms. A. In General. Initial terms of office shall be determined in accordance with City Charter Section 602(b). The initial COC members shall be appointed and convene in accordance with CVMC 3.34.160.D, in time to consider and provide input on the Intended Public Safety Expenditure Plan. SECOND READING AND ADOPTION 127 Ordinance No. ______ Page No. 5 B. Special Rules for Designated Members. Special rules shall apply to COC members that are nominated and qualified through their membership on the board of their Nominating Authority. For such members (hereafter, “Board Qualified COC Members”), if the underlying term on the board for their Nominating Authority expires, they may, nonetheless, continue to serve on the COC until the end of their COC term, provided that they receive the approval of their Nominating Authority board to do so. Otherwise, Board Qualified COC Member terms shall be co-terminus with their terms on their underlying Nominating Authority boards. The Nominating Authority shall notify the City Clerk in writing prior to the end of the Board Qualified COC Member’s term if the Nominating Authority does not authorize their seated member to continue and desires to submit a new nominee or nominees for consideration. 2.63.080 Meeting Frequency. In accordance with CVMC Section 2.25.200, the COC shall set the date, time and location of its regular meetings by written resolution and may change its regular meeting day, time or location by written resolution. The COC shall meet as often as necessary to accomplish the objectives of Chapter 3.34 and this Chapter. It is estimated that the COC will need to meet a minimum of four times per year to fulfill its assigned duties. 2.63.090 Operating Rules and Procedures. Except as expressly provided herein, or as otherwise necessary to implement this Chapter or the requirements of Measure A, the rules governing City boards and commissions generally, as set forth in CVMC Chapter 2.25, shall govern the COC. The COC shall also operate in accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act; this includes requirements that meetings be noticed in advance and be held in public. The COC may also adopt additional rules and procedures in the form of bylaws as provided in CVMC Section 2.25.170. Any such bylaws must be consistent with terms of this Chapter and all other applicable laws. 2.63.100 Staff Support. The City Manager, and/or his/her designee(s), shall serve as the City staff liaison to the COC and shall provide it with administrative support, including designation of a COC staff secretary. The City Attorney, and/or his/her designee(s), shall provide the COC with legal counsel and support. 2.63.110 Dissolution Date. The COC may be disbanded following the implementation of “Phase I” Critical Needs, as reported in the Intended Public Safety Expenditure Plan and (ii) if the City Council elects to disband the COC, the City’s Growth Management Oversight Commission, or an alternative citizens’ group or committee designated by the City Council, shall be responsible for reporting to the City Council, in a manner determined by the City Council, regarding the collections and expenditure of Measure A Revenues and the resulting impacts on public safety. Section II. Severability SECOND READING AND ADOPTION 128 Ordinance No. ______ Page No. 6 If any portion of this Ordinance, or its application to any person or circumstance, is for any reason held to be invalid, unenforceable or unconstitutional, by a court of competent jurisdiction, that portion shall be deemed severable, and such invalidity, unenforceability or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining portions of the Ordinance, or its application to any other person or circumstance. The City Council of the City of Chula Vista hereby declares that it would have adopted each section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance, irrespective of the fact that any one or more other sections, sentences, clauses or phrases of the Ordinance be declared invalid, unenforceable or unconstitutional. Section III. Construction The City Council of the City of Chula Vista intends this Ordinance to supplement, not to contradict, the City Charter, and applicable state and federal law. This Ordinance shall be construed in light of that intent. Section IV. Effective Date This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force on the thirtieth day after its final passage. Section V. Publication The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published or posted according to law. Presented by Approved as to form by Gary Halbert, Glen R. Googins, City Manager City Attorney SECOND READING AND ADOPTION 129 ORDINANCE NO. 3415 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ADDING CHAPTER 3.34 TO TITLE 3 OF THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE TO ESTABLISH A ONE- HALF CENT GENERAL TRANSACTIONS AND USE TAX TO BE ADMINISTERED BY THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TAX AND FEE ADMINISTRATION INCLUDING PROVISIONS FOR CITIZENS’ OVERSIGHT AND ACCOUNTABILITY WHEREAS, at the June 6, 2017 Chula Vista City Council meeting, the City Manager was directed to report back to the Chula Vista City Council within 120 days with a plan to address the perceived chronic understaffing of the Police and Fire Departments, with such plan considering all options, including: i) alternative service models that may improve effectiveness and reduce costs; and ii) potential funding sources; and WHEREAS, staff reported back to the City Council on September 26, 2017, with a Public Safety Staffing Report assessing the following factors: Community and stakeholder feedback/input on priorities for delivery of public safety services Short and long-term staffing level standards for Chula Vista Police Department CVPD) and Chula Vista Fire Department (CVFD) Response times for Priority 1 and Priority 2 emergency calls for CVPD Consideration of alternate public safety service delivery models Accounting for growth: 5-year, 10-year, and build-out projection models Fiscal forecasts and impacts; and WHEREAS, at the September 26, 2017 Chula Vista City Council meeting, the City Council directed the City Manager to come back to the Council with options to address staffing issues and include revenue options; and WHEREAS, at the December 19, 2017 Chula Vista City Council meeting, after considering City staff’s presentation of the public safety staffing strategies report which identified public safety critical needs as well as funding options, the City Council directed the City Manager to return with an item, for Council consideration, to place a ½ cent general sales tax on the ballot in 2018; and WHEREAS, due to the reductions taken in the Police Department during the Great Recession, staffing levels have fallen to below pre-recession levels while the City’s population has grown by approximately 10%; and WHEREAS, the City’s Police Department is staffed at a per capita ratio of 0.86 per 1,000 residents, which is below optimal staffing levels; and DocuSign Envelope ID: 85F135CB-E7B3-4BD0-8985-AF959D10FACD 130 Ordinance No. 3415 Page No. 2 WHEREAS, the Fire Department will need to add staff to accommodate growth and is currently planning for the opening of several new fire stations, adding fire squads in the eastern area of the City and continuing the transition to a 4/0 staffing model; and WHEREAS, the City has conducted public outreach to identify the most critical needs and priorities with respect to addressing the City’s public safety staffing needs, including forming a Public Safety Advisory Committee (PSAC) composed of City residents, business owners, and other stakeholders; and WHEREAS, Public Safety is a top priority of the City, with 67% of discretionary revenues allocated to Police and Fire services; and WHEREAS, although the City’s finances have improved since the recent recession, the City is still experiencing financial challenges and, as reflected in the long term financial plan, will be unable to address the public safety critical staffing needs over the next 10 years; and WHEREAS, the City has determined that the enactment of a general local transactions and use tax (commonly known as a “sales tax”) would allow the City to significantly address the critical public safety staffing needs as presented in the Intended Public Safety Expenditure Plan without compromising existing City services; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Article XIII C of the California Constitution, and California Revenue and Taxation Code Section 7285.9, the City has the authority to enact a local sales tax for general purposes with the approval of the majority of voters in the City voting in an election on the issue; and WHEREAS, the City Council directed staff to prepare for submittal to the voters an ordinance enacting a one-half cent sales tax consistent with all applicable general purpose tax laws, including measures providing for citizens’ oversight, separate accounting and independent audits; and WHEREAS, proposed Chapter 3.34 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, set forth below, establishes a transactions and use tax to be administered by the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration consistent with City Council direction; and WHEREAS, concurrently herewith the City Council is adopting the Intended Public Safety Spending Plan expressing its intention to expend new sales tax revenues on Public Safety critical needs, as more particularly described therein (the “City Council Intended Public Safety Expenditure Plan ”). NOW, THEREFORE, subject to approval by an affirmative, simple majority vote of the people as required by law, the People of the City of Chula Vista do ordain as follows: DocuSign Envelope ID: 85F135CB-E7B3-4BD0-8985-AF959D10FACD 131 Ordinance No. 3415 Page No. 3 SECTION 1: The Chula Vista Municipal Code is hereby revised to add Chapter 3.34 as set forth below, thereby enacting a general local transactions and use tax within the City of Chula Vista, to be administered by the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration: CHAPTER 3.34 CHULA VISTA ONE -HALF CENT TRANSACTIONS AND USE TAX Sections: 3.34.010 Title. 3.34.020 Operative date. 3.34.030 Purpose. 3.34.040 Contract with state. 3.34.050 Transactions tax rate. 3.34.060 Place of sale. 3.34.070 Use tax rate. 3.34.080 Adoption of provisions of state law. 3.34.090 Limitations on adoption of state law and collection of use taxes. 3.34.100 Permit not required. 3.34.110 Exemptions and Exclusions. 3.34.120 Amendments of Revenue and Taxation Code. 3.34.130 Enjoining collection forbidden. 3.34.140 Amendments by City Council. 3.34.150 Use of proceeds. 3.34.160 Citizens’ oversight and accountability. 3.34.170 Severability. 3.34.010 TITLE. This ordinance shall be known as the Chula Vista One-Half Cent Transaction and Use Tax Ordinance. The City of Chula Vista hereinafter shall be called “City.” This Ordinance shall be applicable in the incorporated territory of the City. 3.34.020 OPERATIVE DATE. Operative Date” means the first day of the first calendar quarter commencing more than 110 days after the adoption of this ordinance, the date of such adoption being as set forth below. 3.34.030. PURPOSE. This Ordinance is adopted to achieve the following, among other purposes, and directs that the provisions hereof be interpreted in order to accomplish those purposes: A. To impose a general retail transactions and use tax, in accordance with the provisions of Part 1.6 (commencing with Section 7251) of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code and Section 7285.9 of Part 1.7 of Division 2 which authorizes the City to adopt this tax ordinance which shall be operative if a majority vote of the electors voting on the measure vote to approve the imposition of the tax at an election called for that purpose. DocuSign Envelope ID: 85F135CB-E7B3-4BD0-8985-AF959D10FACD 132 Ordinance No. 3415 Page No. 4 B. To adopt a general retail transactions and use tax ordinance that incorporates provisions identical to those of the Sales and Use Tax Law of the State of California insofar as those provisions are not inconsistent with the requirements and limitations contained in Part 1.6 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code. C. To adopt a general retail transactions and use tax ordinance that imposes a tax and provides a measure therefore that can be administered and collected by the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration in a manner that adapts itself as fully as practicable to, and requires the least possible deviation from, the existing statutory and administrative procedures followed by the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration in administering and collecting the California State Sales and Use Taxes. D. To adopt a general retail transactions and use tax ordinance that can be administered in a manner that will be, to the greatest degree possible, consistent with the provisions of Part 1.6 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, minimize the cost of collecting the transactions and use taxes, and at the same time, minimize the burden of record keeping upon persons subject to taxation under the provisions of this Ordinance. 3.34.040 CONTRACT WITH STATE. Prior to the Operative Date, City shall contract with the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration to perform all functions incident to the administration and operation of this transactions and use tax Ordinance; provided, that if the City shall not have contracted with the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration prior to the Operative Date, it shall nevertheless so contract, and in such a case the Operative Date shall be the first day of the first calendar quarter following the effective date of such a contract. 3.34.050 TRANSACTIONS TAX RATE. For the privilege of selling tangible personal property at retail, a tax is hereby imposed upon all retailers in the incorporated territory of the City at the rate of one-half of one percent (0.5%) of the gross receipts of any retailer from the sale of all tangible personal property sold at retail in said territory on and after the Operative Date of this Ordinance. 3.34.060 PLACE OF SALE. For the purposes of this Ordinance, all retail sales are consummated at the place of business of the retailer unless the tangible personal property sold is delivered by the retailer or his agent to an out- of-state destination or to a common carrier for delivery to an out -of-state destination. The gross receipts from such sales shall include delivery charges, when such charges are subject to the State sales and use tax, regardless of the place to which delivery is made. In the event a retailer has no permanent place of business in the State or has more than one place of business, the place or places at which the retail sales are consummated shall be determined under rules and regulations to be prescribed and adopted by the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration. DocuSign Envelope ID: 85F135CB-E7B3-4BD0-8985-AF959D10FACD 133 Ordinance No. 3415 Page No. 5 3.34.070 USE TAX RATE. An excise tax is hereby imposed on the storage, use or other consumption in the City of tangible personal property purchased from any retailer on and after the Operative Date of this Ordinance for storage, use or other consumption in said territory at the rate of one-half of one percent (0.5%) of the sales price of the property. The sales price shall include delivery charges when such charges are subject to state sales or use tax regardless of the place to which delivery is made. 3.34.080 ADOPTION OF PROVISIONS OF STATE LAW. Except as otherwise provided in this Ordinance and except insofar as they are inconsistent with the provisions of Part 1.6 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, all of the provisions of Part 1 (commencing with Section 6001) of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code are hereby adopted and made a part of this Ordinance as though fully set forth herein. 3.34.090 LIMITATIONS ON ADOPTION OF STATE LAW AND COLLECTION OF USE TAXES. In adopting the provisions of Part 1 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code: A. Wherever the State of California is named or referred to as the taxing agency, the name of this City shall be substituted therefor. However, the substitution shall not be made when: 1. The word “State” is used as part of the title of the State Controller, State Treasurer, State Treasury, or the Constitution of the State of California; 2. The result of that substitution would require action be taken by or against this City or any agency, officer, or employee thereof, rather than by or against the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration, in performing the functions incident to the administration or operation of this Ordinance. 3. In those sections, including but not necessarily limited to sections referring to the exterior boundaries of the State of California, where the result of the substitution would be to: a. Provide an exemption from this tax with respect to certain sales, storage, use or other consumption of tangible personal property which would not otherwise be exempt from this tax while such sales, storage, use or other consumption remain subject to tax by the State under the provisions of Part 1 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code; or b. Impose this tax with respect to certain sales, storage, use or other consumption of tangible personal property which would not be subject to tax by the State under the said provision of that code. 4. In Sections 6701, 6702 (except in the last sentence thereof), 6711, 6715, 6737, 6797 or 6828 of the Revenue and Taxation Code. DocuSign Envelope ID: 85F135CB-E7B3-4BD0-8985-AF959D10FACD 134 Ordinance No. 3415 Page No. 6 B. The word “City” shall be substituted for the word “State” in the phrase “retailer engaged in business in this State” in Section 6203 and in the definition of that phrase in Section 6203. 3.34.100 PERMIT NOT REQUIRED. If a seller’s permit has been issued to a retailer under Section 6067 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, an additional transactor’s permit shall not be required by this Ordinance. 3.34.110 EXEMPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS. A. There shall be excluded from the measure of the transactions tax and the use tax the amount of any sales tax or use tax imposed by the State of California or by any city, city and county, or county pursuant to the Bradley-Burns Uniform Local Sales and Use Tax Law or the amount of any state-administered transactions or use tax. B. There are exempted from the computation of the amount of transactions tax the gross receipts from: 1. Sales of tangible personal property, other than fuel or petroleum products, to operators of aircraft to be used or consumed principally outside the county in which the sale is made and directly and exclusively in the use of such aircraft as common carriers of persons or property under the authority of the laws of this State, the United States, or any foreign government. 2. Sales of property to be used outside the City which is shipped to a point outside the City, pursuant to the contract of sale, by delivery to such point by the retailer or his agent, or by delivery by the retailer to a carrier for shipment to a consignee at such point. For the purposes of this paragraph, delivery to a point outside the City shall be satisfied: a. With respect to vehicles (other than commercial vehicles) subject to registration pursuant to Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 4000) of Division 3 of the Vehicle Code, aircraft licensed in compliance with Section 21411 of the Public Utilities Code, and undocumented vessels registered under Chapter 2 of Division 3.5 (commencing with Section 9840) of the Vehicle Code by registration to an out-of-City address and by a declaration under penalty of perjury, signed by the buyer, stating that such address is, in fact, his or her principal place of residence; and b. With respect to commercial vehicles, by registration to a place of business out-of-City and declaration under penalty of perjury, signed by the buyer, that the vehicle will be operated from that address. 3. The sale of tangible personal property if the seller is obligated to furnish the property for a fixed price pursuant to a contract entered into prior to the operative date of this Ordinance. DocuSign Envelope ID: 85F135CB-E7B3-4BD0-8985-AF959D10FACD 135 Ordinance No. 3415 Page No. 7 4. A lease of tangible personal property which is a continuing sale of such property, for any period of time for which the lessor is obligated to lease the property for an amount fixed by the lease prior to the operative date of this Ordinance. 5. For the purposes of subsections (3) and (4) of this section, the sale or lease of tangible personal property shall be deemed not to be obligated pursuant to a contract or lease for any period of time for which any party to the contract or lease has the unconditional right to terminate the contract or lease upon notice, whether or not such right is exercised. C. There are exempted from the use tax imposed by this Ordinance, the storage, use or other consumption in this City of tangible personal property; 1. The gross receipts from the sale of which have been subject to a transactions tax under any State-administered transactions and use tax ordinance. 2. Other than fuel or petroleum products purchased by operators of aircraft and used or consumed by such operators directly and exclusively in the use of such aircraft as common carriers of persons or property for hire or compensation under a certificate of public convenience and necessity issued pursuant to the laws of this State, the United States, or any foreign government. This exemption is in addition to the exemptions provided in Sections 6366 and 6366.1 of the Revenue and Taxation Code of the State of California. 3. If the purchaser is obligated to purchase the property for a fixed price pursuant to a contract entered into prior to the operative date of this Ordinance. 4. If the possession of, or the exercise of any right or power over, the tangible personal property arises under a lease which is a continuing purchase of such property for any period of time for which the lessee is obligated to lease the property for an amount fixed by a lease prior to the Operative Date of this Ordinance. 5. For the purposes of subparagraphs (3) and (4) of this section, storage, use, or other consumption, or possession of, or exercise of any right or power over, tangible personal property shall be deemed not to be obligated pursuant to a contract or lease for any period of time for which any party to the contract or lease has the unconditional right to terminate the contract or lease upon notice, whether or not such right is exercised. 6. Except as provided in subparagraph (7), a retailer engaged in business in the City shall not be required to collect use tax from the purchaser of tangible personal property, unless the retailer ships or delivers the property into the City or participates within the City in making the sale of the property, including, but not limited to, soliciting or receiving the order, either directly or indirectly, at a place of business of the retailer in the City or through any representative, agent, canvasser, solicitor, subsidiary, or person in the City under the authority of the retailer. 7. “A retailer engaged in business in the City” shall also include any retailer of any of the following: vehicles subject to registration pursuant to Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 4000) of Division 3 of the Vehicle Code, aircraft licensed in compliance with Section 21411 of the Public Utilities Code, or undocumented vessels registered under Division 3.5 DocuSign Envelope ID: 85F135CB-E7B3-4BD0-8985-AF959D10FACD 136 Ordinance No. 3415 Page No. 8 commencing with Section 9840) of the Vehicle Code. That retailer shall be required to collect use tax from any purchaser who registers or licenses the vehicle, vessel, or aircraft at an address in the City. D. Any person subject to use tax under this Ordinance may credit against that tax any transactions tax or reimbursement for transactions tax paid to a district imposing, or retailer liable for a transactions tax pursuant to Part 1.6 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code with respect to the sale to the person of the property the storage, use or other consumptions of which is subject to the use tax. 3.34.120 AMENDMENTS OF REVENUE AND TAXATION CODE. All amendments subsequent to the effective date of this Ordinance to Part 1 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code relating to sales and use taxes and which are not inconsistent with Part 1.6 and Part 1.7 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, and all amendments to Part 1.6 and Part 1.7 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, shall automatically become a part of this Ordinance, provided however, that no such amendment shall operate so as to affect the rate of tax imposed by this Ordinance. 3.34.130 ENJOINING COLLECTION FORBIDDEN. No injunction or writ of mandate or other legal or equitable process shall issue in any suit, action or proceeding in any court against the State or the City, or against any officer of the State or the City, to prevent or enjoin the collection under this Ordinance, or Part 1.6 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, of any tax or any amount of tax required to be collected. 3.34.140 AMENDMENTS BY CITY COUNCIL. The following amendments to this Ordinance must be approved by the voters of the City: increasing the tax rate; revising the methodology for calculating the tax, such that a tax increase would result; imposing the tax on transactions and uses not previously subject to the tax (unless such amendment occurs automatically by operation of law); or terminating the tax. The City Council may otherwise amend this Ordinance without submitting the amendment to the voters for approval in any manner which does not constitute a tax “increase” as that term is defined in Government Code section 53750(h). 3.34.150 USE OF PROCEEDS. The proceeds from the tax imposed by this Ordinance shall be for unrestricted general revenue purposes of the City and shall be received into the general fund of the City. Nothing in this Ordinance shall constitute the tax imposed under this Ordinance as a special tax, or bind the City to use the proceeds for any specific purpose or function; the City Council shall retain discretion to expend the proceeds of the tax for any lawful purpose of the City. DocuSign Envelope ID: 85F135CB-E7B3-4BD0-8985-AF959D10FACD 137 Ordinance No. 3415 Page No. 9 3.34.160 CITIZENS’ OVERSIGHT AND ACCOUNTABILITY. In order to provide for citizens’ oversight, transparency and accountability in connection with expenditures of tax revenues generated under the terms of this Ordinance, the City shall do the following: A. Line Item Accounting. All revenue generated by the tax (“Measure A Revenues”) shall be accounted in the General Fund as a separate line item entitled “Local Transactions and Use Tax – Measure A Revenues.” Measure A Revenues and expenditures will be tracked and accounted for by City Finance Department staff in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), and presented annually in a report (the “Finance Department Report”) to the Citizens’Oversight Committee (“COC”) created pursuant to subdivision D., below B. Annual Submittal of Measure A Public Safety Expenditure Plan. If Measure A is approved by the voters, beginning in Fiscal Year 2018-19, and for each subsequent year, prior to City Council consideration of the City’s annual budget, City staff will prepare and present to the COC for its review a spending plan for the Measure A Revenues. Such plan (the “Measure A Spending Plan”) shall be (1) consistent with the City Council Intended Public Safety Expenditure Plan approved concurrently with this Ordinance; (2) include specific proposals for near term expenditures; and (3) a plan for expenditures for the next ten-years to address the “Phase I” Critical Needs described therein. After review by the COC, the Measure A Spending Plan for the upcoming Fiscal Year shall be incorporated into the City Manager’s proposed budget, and then presented to the City Council for its consideration and action, in its discretion, as part of the City’s annual budget process. The City Council must consider for approval the expenditure of projected Measure A Revenues as a separate line item category in each year’s budget. The COC’s duties under this section shall continue until and unless the City Council appoints another commission, committee, or group to be responsible for reporting to the City Council, pursuant to section D., below. C. Annual, Independent Audit. Beginning with the fiscal year 2018-2019, the City’s independent auditors shall, as part of their annual audit of the City’s financial statements, review the collection and expenditure of Measure A Revenues. D. Measure A Oversight Committee. Prior to the Operative Date, the City shall create and convene a Citizens’ Oversight Committee (“COC”). The function of the COC shall be to review and report on City compliance with the terms of this Ordinance and the spending guidelines contained in the City Council Intended Public Safety Expenditure Plan and each Measure A Spending Plan presented to and approved by the City Council thereafter. The COC shall operate in accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act, which includes requirements that meetings be noticed in advance and held in public. The COC shall be created by City Council ordinance consistent with the terms of this Section adopted no later than 150 days following the date of the election at which Measure A is approved by the voters. The COC may be disbanded following the implementation of “Phase I” Critical Needs, as reported in the Intended Public Safety Expenditure Plan. If the City Council elects to disband the COC, the City’s Growth Management Oversight Commission, or an appropriate alternative citizens’ group or committee designated by the City Council, shall be responsible for reporting to the City Council, in a manner to be determined by the City Council, regarding the collection and expenditure of Measure A Revenues and the resulting impacts on public safety. DocuSign Envelope ID: 85F135CB-E7B3-4BD0-8985-AF959D10FACD 138 Ordinance No. 3415 Page No. 10 3.34.170 SEVERABILITY. If any provision of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the ordinance and the application of such provision to other persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby. Such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of the Ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Ordinance are severable. This People of the City of Chula Vista hereby declare that they would have adopted this Ordinance irrespective of the invalidity of any particular portion thereof and intend that the invalid portions should be severed and the balance of the Ordinance be enforced. SECTION 2: The City Clerk shall be authorized to replace the terms "Measure Y" wherever they appear in this Ordinance with the respective ballot designations determined by the County Registrar before this Ordinance is codified. SECTION 3: Upon approval by the voters, the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause it to be published according to law. SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE] DocuSign Envelope ID: 85F135CB-E7B3-4BD0-8985-AF959D10FACD 139 Ordinance No. 3415 Page No. 11 Presented by: Approved as to form by: Gary Halbert Glen R. Googins City Manager City Attorney PASSED and APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, California, this 27th day of February 2018, by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers: Aguilar, Diaz, Padilla, and Salas NAYS: Councilmembers: None ABSENT: Councilmembers: McCann Mary Salas, Mayor ATTEST: Kerry K. Bigelow, MMC, City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) CITY OF CHULA VISTA ) I, Kerry K. Bigelow, City Clerk of Chula Vista, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 3415 had its first reading at a regular meeting held on the 13th day of February 2018 and its second reading at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 27th day of February 2018; and was duly published in summary form in accordance with the requirements of state law and the City Charter. Dated Kerry K. Bigelow, MMC, City Clerk CERTIFICATION ON FOLLOWING PAGE] DocuSign Envelope ID: 85F135CB-E7B3-4BD0-8985-AF959D10FACD 3/16/2018 140 141 P a g e | 1 August 14, 2018 File ID: 18-0043 TITLE RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING AN AGREEMENT FOR THE PREPARATION OF A MULTI-MODAL PEDESTRIAN/BIKEWAY MASTER PLAN BETWEEN THE CITY AND CHEN RYAN ASSOCIATES, INC. (CIP# STL0404) RECOMMENDED ACTION Council adopt the resolution. SUMMARY To address the current and future needs of pedestrians and bicyclists citywide, the City issued a Request for Proposals for the preparation of a Multi-Modal Pedestrian/Bikeway Master Plan. Six (6) firms submitted proposals and all six (6) firms were interviewed. Based on the review of the proposals and the interviews, staff recommends that the contract be awarded to Chen Ryan Associates, Inc. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The proposed activity has been reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and it has been determined that the activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines because it will not result in a physical change in the environment; therefore, pursuant to Section 15060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Thus, no environmental review is required. Although environmental review is not required at this time, once the scope of individual projects to be funded have been fully defined and the requested grant funding has been received, environmental review will be required for each project as may be needed and the appropriate environmental determination will be made. BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION Not applicable DISCUSSION In February 2017, the City was awarded a SANDAG Active Transportation Grant – Cycle 3 for the preparation of the City’s Multi-Modal Pedestrian/Bikeway Master Plan (Master Plan). The Master Plan will focus on interconnectivity between various pedestrian/bicycle facilities and transit. Public comment will be obtained through a stakeholders’ group, community workshops and questionnaire/survey. On October 6, 2017, the City issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) for preparation of the Master Plan. The RFP was 142 P a g e | 2 advertised in accordance with the City’s requirements. The project budget is $350,000 for City staff and consultant costs. Proposals were due by 4:00 pm on November 15, 2017. City staff received all proposals by the due date. A four-member selection panel evaluated the consultants’ proposals and ranked the consultants as shown in the table below. RANK CONSULTANT (LOCATION)FEE ESTIMATE 1 Chen Ryan Associates, Inc. (San Diego, CA)$249,140.00 2 IBI Group (San Diego, CA)$249,946.00 3 KTUA (San Diego, CA)$252,630.00 4 KOA Corporation (San Diego, CA)$347,395.00 5 Alta Planning + Design (San Diego, CA)$349,286.00 6 Fehr & Peers (San Diego, CA)$238,302.00 The selection panel interviewed all the above listed consultants on December 12-13, 2017. Based on the interviews and the qualifications of the project team, their understanding of the work to be done, and their knowledge and focus on newer modes of transportation, staff recommends that the contract be awarded to Chen Ryan Associates, Inc. Staff met and negotiated with Chen Ryan Associates, Inc. and the final proposed cost of the contract had a nominal increase of $700 to a total of$249,840. The contract will include the following: •Develop Timeline and Public Involvement Plan •Prepare Status Report on Existing Conditions •Conduct City Staff Meetings and Stakeholders’ Meetings •Conduct Public Meetings and Other Public Participation Efforts •Prepare Draft Plan •Present Report to Safety Commission and City Council •Prepare Final Multi-modal Pedestrian/Bikeway Master Plan •Environmental Clearance (Optional) Once future pedestrian/bicycle projects are defined by the Master Plan, staff may consider amending the consultant’s agreement to include the Environmental Clearance task. Obtaining Environmental Clearance on defined improvement projects, improves the ability to obtain grant funding. The terms of the potential amendment will be determined at a future date. DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT Staff has reviewed the decision contemplated by this action and has determined that it is not site-specific and consequently, the 500-foot rule found in California Code of Regulations Title 2, section 18702.2(a)(11), is not applicable to this decision for purposes of determining a disqualifying real property-related financial conflict of interest under the Political Reform Act (Cal. Gov't Code § 87100, et seq.). 143 P a g e | 3 Staff is not independently aware, and has not been informed by any City Council member, of any other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter. LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS The City’s Strategic Plan has five major goals: Operational Excellence, Economic Vitality, Healthy Community, Strong and Secure Neighborhoods and a Connected Community. The goal of the Multi-Modal Pedestrian/Bikeway Master Plan is to support the Strong and Secure Neighborhood Strategy. It will guide City staff in planning for pedestrian and bicycle improvements on future projects, thereby providing a safe and efficient “complete streets” roadway system for all modes of transportation. CURRENT-YEAR FISCAL IMPACT Adoption of the resolution will approve an agreement for preparation of a Multi-Modal Pedestrian/Bicycle Master Plan. Sufficient funds are available in CIP STL0404 to cover the $249,840 cost associated with the agreement and City staff support costs. Therefore, no additional appropriation is necessary. ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT As recommendations associated with these plans are implemented, the improvements will require routine maintenance. ATTACHMENTS 1. Proposed Agreement with Chen Ryan Associates, Inc. Staff Contact: Patrick Moneda, Senior Civil Engineer 144 ?City of Chula Vista Agreement No.: 180691 Consultant Name: Chen Ryan Associates, Inc.Rev. 10/24/17 CITY OF CHULA VISTA CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH CHEN RYAN ASSOCIATES, INC. TO PROVIDE CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR THE MULTI-MODAL PEDESTRIAN/BIKEWAY MASTER PLAN This Agreement is entered into effective as of August 14, 2018(“Effective Date”) by and between the City of Chula Vista, a chartered municipal corporation (“City”) and Chen Ryan Associates, Inc.,Chen Ryan Associates, Inc.(“Consultant”) (collectively, the “Parties” and, individually, a “Party”) with reference to the following facts: RECITALS WHEREAS,City requires civil engineering consultant services in order to prepare the City of Chula Vista Multi-Modal Pedestrian/Bicycle Master Plan;and WHEREAS,in order to procure these services City solicited proposals in accordance with Chula Vista Municipal Code Section 2.56.110 for “professional services”, received 6 proposals, and selected Consultant as the most qualified amongst those submitting; and WHEREAS, Consultant warrants and represents that it is experienced and staffed in a manner such that it can deliver the services required of Consultant to City in accordance with the time frames and the terms and conditions of this Agreement. [End of Recitals. Next Page Starts Obligatory Provisions.] 145 ?City of Chula Vista Agreement No.: 180691 Consultant Name: Chen Ryan Associates, Inc.Rev. 10/24/17 OBLIGATORY PROVISIONS NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above recitals, the covenants contained herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which the Parties hereby acknowledge, City and Consultant hereby agree as follows: 1. SERVICES 1.1 Required Services. Consultant agrees to perform the services, and deliver to City the “Deliverables” (if any)described in the attached Exhibit A,incorporated into the Agreement by this reference, within the time frames set forth therein, time being of the essence for this Agreement. The services and/or Deliverables described in Exhibit A shall be referred to herein as the “Required Services.” 1.2 Reductions in Scope of Work. City may independently, or upon request from Consultant, from time to time, reduce the Required Services to be performed by the Consultant under this Agreement. Upon doing so, City and Consultant agree to meet and confer in good faith for the purpose of negotiating a corresponding reduction in the compensation associated with the reduction. 1.3 Additional Services. Subject to compliance with the City’s Charter, codes, policies, procedures and ordinances governing procurement and purchasing authority, City may request Consultant provide additional services related to the Required Services (“Additional Services”). If so, City and Consultant agree to meet and confer in good faith for the purpose of negotiating an amendment to Exhibit A, to add the Additional Services. Unless otherwise agreed, compensation for the Additional Services shall be charged and paid consistent with the rates and terms already provided therein. Once added to Exhibit A, “Additional Services” shall also become “Required Services” for purposes of this Agreement. 1.4 Standard of Care. Consultant expressly warrants and agrees that any and all Required Services hereunder shall be performed in accordance with the highest standard of care exercised by members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions and in similar locations. 1.5 No Waiver of Standard of Care. Where approval by City is required, it is understood to be conceptual approval only and does not relieve the Consultant of responsibility for complying with all laws, codes, industry standards, and liability for damages caused by negligent acts, errors, omissions, noncompliance with industry standards, or the willful misconduct of the Consultant or its subcontractors. 1.6 Security for Performance. In the event that Exhibit A Section 4 indicates the need for Consultant to provide additional security for performance of its duties under this Agreement, Consultant shall provide such additional security prior to commencement of its Required Services in the form and on the terms prescribed on Exhibit A, or as otherwise prescribed by the City Attorney. 1.7 Compliance with Laws.In its performance of the Required Services, Consultant shall comply with any and all applicable federal, state and local laws,including the Chula Vista Municipal Code. 1.8 Business License. Prior to commencement of work, Consultant shall obtain a business license from City. 1.9 Subcontractors. Prior to commencement of any work, Consultant shall submit for City’s information and approval a list of any and all subcontractors to be used by Consultant in the performance of the Required Services. Consultant agrees to take appropriate measures necessary to ensure that all 146 ?City of Chula Vista Agreement No.: 180691 Consultant Name: Chen Ryan Associates, Inc.Rev. 10/24/17 subcontractors and personnel utilized by the Consultant to complete its obligations under this Agreement comply with all applicable laws, regulations, ordinances, and policies, whether federal, state, or local. In addition, if any subcontractor is expected to fulfill any responsibilities of the Consultant under this Agreement, Consultant shall ensure that each and every subcontractor carries out the Consultant’s responsibilities as set forth in this Agreement. 1.10 Term. This Agreement shall commence on the earlier to occur of the Effective Date or Consultant’s commencement of the Required Services hereunder, and shall terminate when the Parties have complied with all their obligations hereunder; provided, however, provisions which expressly survive termination shall remain in effect. 2.COMPENSATION 2.1 General. For satisfactory performance of the Required Services, City agrees to compensate Consultant in the amount(s) and on the terms set forth in Exhibit A, Section 4. Standard terms for billing and payment are set forth in this Section 2. 2.2 Detailed Invoicing.Consultant agrees to provide City with a detailed invoice for services performed each month, within thirty (30) days of the end of the month in which the services were performed, unless otherwise specified in Exhibit A. Invoicing shall begin on the first of the month following the Effective Date of the Agreement. All charges must be presented in a line item format with each task separately explained in reasonable detail. Each invoice shall include the current monthly amount being billed, the amount invoiced to date, and the remaining amount available under any approved budget. Consultant must obtain prior written authorization from City for any fees or expenses that exceed the estimated budget. 2.3 Payment to Consultant. Upon receipt of a properly prepared invoice and confirmation that the Required Services detailed in the invoice have been satisfactorily performed, City shall pay Consultant for the invoice amount within thirty (30) days. Payment shall be made in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in Exhibit A and section 2.4, below. At City’s discretion, invoices not timely submitted may be subject to a penalty of up to five percent (5%) of the amount invoiced. 2.4 Retention Policy.City shall retain ten percent (10%)of the amount due for Required Services detailed on each invoice (the “holdback amount”). Upon City review and determination of Project Completion, the holdback amount will be issued to Consultant. 2.5 Reimbursement of Costs. City may reimburse Consultant’s out-of-pocket costs incurred by Consultant in the performance of the Required Services if negotiated in advance and included in Exhibit A. Unless specifically provided in Exhibit A, Consultant shall be responsible for any and all out-of-pocket costs incurred by Consultant in the performance of the Required Services. 2.6 Exclusions. City shall not be responsible for payment to Consultant for any fees or costs in excess of any agreed upon budget, rate or other maximum amount(s) provided for in Exhibit A. City shall also not be responsible for any cost: (a) incurred prior to the Effective Date; or (b) arising out of or related to the errors, omissions, negligence or acts of willful misconduct of Consultant, its agents, employees, or subcontractors. 2.7 Payment Not Final Approval. Consultant understands and agrees that payment to the Consultant or reimbursement for any Consultant costs related to the performance of Required Services does not constitute a City final decision regarding whether such payment or cost reimbursement is allowable and eligible for 147 ?City of Chula Vista Agreement No.: 180691 Consultant Name: Chen Ryan Associates, Inc.Rev. 10/24/17 payment under this Agreement, nor does it constitute a waiver of any violation by Consultant of the terms of this Agreement. If City determines that Consultant is not entitled to receive any amount of compensation already paid, City will notify Consultant in writing and Consultant shall promptly return such amount. 3.INSURANCE 3.1 Required Insurance. Consultant must procure and maintain, during the period of performance of Required Services under this Agreement, and for twelve months after completion of Required Services, the policies of insurance described on the attached Exhibit B,incorporated into the Agreement by this reference (the “Required Insurance”). The Required Insurance shall also comply with all other terms of this Section. 3.2 Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions relating to the Required Insurance must be disclosed to and approved by City in advance of the commencement of work. 3.3 Standards for Insurers. Required Insurance must be placed with licensed insurers admitted to transact business in the State of California with a current A.M. Best’s rating of A V or better, or, if insurance is placed with a surplus lines insurer, insurer must be listed on the State of California List of Eligible Surplus Lines Insurers (LESLI) with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A X. For Workers’Compensation Insurance, insurance issued by the State Compensation Fund is also acceptable. 3.4 Subcontractors. Consultant must include all sub-consultants/sub-contractors as insureds under its policies and/or furnish separate certificates and endorsements demonstrating separate coverage for those not under its policies. Any separate coverage for sub-consultants must also comply with the terms of this Agreement. 3.5 Additional Insureds. City, its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers must be named as additional insureds with respect to any policy of general liability, automobile, or pollution insurance specified as required in Exhibit B or as may otherwise be specified by City’s Risk Manager.. The general liability additional insured coverage must be provided in the form of an endorsement to the Consultant’s insurance using ISO CG 2010 (11/85) or its equivalent; such endorsement must not exclude Products/Completed Operations coverage. 3.6 General Liability Coverage to be “Primary.”Consultant’s general liability coverage must be primary insurance as it pertains to the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers is wholly separate from the insurance provided by Consultant and in no way relieves Consultant from its responsibility to provide insurance. 3.7 No Cancellation.No Required Insurance policy may be canceled by either Party during the required insured period under this Agreement, except after thirty days’ prior written notice to the City by certified mail, return receipt requested. Prior to the effective date of any such cancellation Consultant must procure and put into effect equivalent coverage(s). 3.8 Waiver of Subrogation. Consultant’s insurer(s) will provide a Waiver of Subrogation in favor of the City for each Required Insurance policy under this Agreement. In addition, Consultant waives any right it may have or may obtain to subrogation for a claim against City. 3.9 Verification of Coverage. Prior to commencement of any work, Consultant shall furnish City with original certificates of insurance and any amendatory endorsements necessary to demonstrate to City that 148 ?City of Chula Vista Agreement No.: 180691 Consultant Name: Chen Ryan Associates, Inc.Rev. 10/24/17 Consultant has obtained the Required Insurance in compliance with the terms of this Agreement. The words “will endeavor” and “but failure to mail such notice shall impose no obligation or liability of any kind upon the company, its agents, or representatives” or any similar language must be deleted from all certificates. The required certificates and endorsements should otherwise be on industry standard forms. The City reserves the right to require, at any time, complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements evidencing the coverage required by these specifications. 3.10 Claims Made Policy Requirements. If General Liability, Pollution and/or Asbestos Pollution Liability and/or Errors & Omissions coverage are required and are provided on a claims-made form, the following requirements also apply: a.The “Retro Date” must be shown, and must be before the date of this Agreement or the beginning of the work required by this Agreement. b.Insurance must be maintained, and evidence of insurance must be provided, for at least five (5) years after completion of the work required by this Agreement. c.If coverage is canceled or non-renewed, and not replaced with another claims-made policy form with a “Retro Date” prior to the effective date of this Agreement, the Consultant must purchase “extended reporting” coverage for a minimum of five (5) years after completion of the work required by this Agreement. d.A copy of the claims reporting requirements must be submitted to the City for review. 3.11 Not a Limitation of Other Obligations. Insurance provisions under this section shall not be construed to limit the Consultant’s obligations under this Agreement, including Indemnity. 3.12 Additional Coverage. To the extent that insurance coverage provided by Consultant maintains higher limits than the minimums appearing in Exhibit B, City requires and shall be entitled to coverage for higher limits maintained. 4. INDEMNIFICATION 4.1. General. To the maximum extent allowed by law, Consultant shall protect, defend, indemnify and hold harmless City, its elected and appointed officers, agents, employees and volunteers (collectively, “Indemnified Parties”), from and against any and all claims, demands, causes of action, costs, expenses, (including reasonable attorneys’ fees and court costs), liability, loss, damage or injury, in law or equity, to property or persons, including wrongful death, in any manner arising out of or incident to any alleged acts, omissions, negligence, or willful misconduct of Consultant, its officials, officers, employees, agents, and contractors, arising out of or in connection with the performance of the Required Services, the results of such performance, or this Agreement. This indemnity provision does not include any claims, damages, liability, costs and expenses arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the Indemnified Parties. Also covered is liability arising from, connected with, caused by or claimed to be caused by the active or passive negligent acts or omissions of the Indemnified Parties which may be in combination with the active or passive negligent acts or omissions of the Consultant, its employees, agents or officers, or any third party. 4.2. Modified Indemnity Where Agreement Involves Design Professional Services. Notwithstanding the forgoing, if the services provided under this Agreement are design professional services, as defined by 149 ?City of Chula Vista Agreement No.: 180691 Consultant Name: Chen Ryan Associates, Inc.Rev. 10/24/17 California Civil Code section 2782.8, as may be amended from time to time, the defense and indemnity obligation under Section 1, above, shall be limited to the extent required by California Civil Code section 2782.8. 4.3 Costs of Defense and Award. Included in Consultant’s obligations under this Section 4 is Consultant’s obligation to defend, at Consultant’s own cost, expense and risk, any and all suits, actions or other legal proceedings that may be brought or instituted against one or more of the Indemnified Parties. Subject to the limitations in this Section 4, Consultant shall pay and satisfy any judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against one or more of the Indemnified Parties for any and all related legal expenses and costs incurred by any of them. 4.4. Consultant’s Obligations Not Limited or Modified. Consultant’s obligations under this Section 4 shall not be limited to insurance proceeds, if any, received by the Indemnified Parties, or by any prior or subsequent declaration by the Consultant. Furthermore, Consultant’s obligations under this Section 4 shall in no way limit, modify or excuse any of Consultant’s other obligations or duties under this Agreement. 4.5. Enforcement Costs. Consultant agrees to pay any and all costs City incurs in enforcing Consultant’s obligations under this Section 4. 4.6 Survival. Consultant’s obligations under this Section 4 shall survive the termination of this Agreement. 5.FINANCIAL INTERESTS OF CONSULTANT. 5.1 Form 700 Filing.The California Political Reform Act and the Chula Vista Conflict of Interest Code require certain government officials and consultants performing work for government agencies to publicly disclose certain of their personal assets and income using a Statement of Economic Interests form (Form 700). In order to assure compliance with these requirements, Consultant shall comply with the disclosure requirements identified in the attached Exhibit C, incorporated into the Agreement by this reference. 5.2 Disclosures; Prohibited Interests.Independent of whether Consultant is required to file a Form 700, Consultant warrants and represents that it has disclosed to City any economic interests held by Consultant, or its employees or subcontractors who will be performing the Required Services, in any real property or project which is the subject of this Agreement. Consultant warrants and represents that it has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee or approved subcontractor working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants and represents that it has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee or approved subcontractor working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. Consultant further warrants and represents that no officer or employee of City, has any interest, whether contractual, non- contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, the proceeds hereof, or in the business of Consultant or Consultant’s subcontractors. Consultant further agrees to notify City in the event any such interest is discovered whether or not such interest is prohibited by law or this Agreement. For breach or violation of any of these warranties, City shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. 6.REMEDIES 6.1 Termination for Cause. If for any reason whatsoever Consultant shall fail to perform the Required Services under this Agreement, in a proper or timely manner, or if Consultant shall violate any of the other 150 ?City of Chula Vista Agreement No.: 180691 Consultant Name: Chen Ryan Associates, Inc.Rev. 10/24/17 covenants, agreements or conditions of this Agreement (each a “Default”), in addition to any and all other rights and remedies City may have under this Agreement, at law or in equity, City shall have the right to terminate this Agreement by giving five (5) days written notice to Consultant. Such notice shall identify the Default and the Agreement termination date. If Consultant notifies City of its intent to cure such Default prior to City’s specified termination date, and City agrees that the specified Default is capable of being cured, City may grant Consultant up to ten (10) additional days after the designated termination date to effectuate such cure. In the event of a termination under this Section 6.1, Consultant shall immediately provide City any and all ”Work Product” (defined in Section 7 below) prepared by Consultant as part of the Required Services. Such Work Product shall be City’s sole and exclusive property as provided in Section 7 hereof. Consultant may be entitled to compensation for work satisfactorily performed prior to Consultant’s receipt of the Default notice; provided, however, in no event shall such compensation exceed the amount that would have been payable under this Agreement for such work, and any such compensation shall be reduced by any costs incurred or projected to be incurred by City as a result of the Default. 6.2 Termination or Suspension for Convenience of City. City may suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion of the Required Services, at any time and for any reason, with or without cause, by giving specific written notice to Consultant of such termination or suspension at least fifteen (15) days prior to the effective date thereof. Upon receipt of such notice, Consultant shall immediately cease all work under the Agreement and promptly deliver all “Work Product” (defined in Section 7 below) to City. Such Work Product shall be City's sole and exclusive property as provided in Section 7 hereof. Consultant shall be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for this Work Product in an amount equal to the amount due and payable under this Agreement for work satisfactorily performed as of the date of the termination/suspension notice plus any additional remaining Required Services requested or approved by City in advance that would maximize City’s value under the Agreement. 6.3 Waiver of Claims. In the event City terminates the Agreement in accordance with the terms of this Section, Consultant hereby expressly waives any and all claims for damages or compensation as a result of such termination except as expressly provided in this Section 6. 6.4 Administrative Claims Requirements and Procedures. No suit or arbitration shall be brought arising out of this Agreement against City unless a claim has first been presented in writing and filed with City and acted upon by City in accordance with the procedures set forth in Chapter 1.34 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, as same may be amended, the provisions of which, including such policies and procedures used by City in the implementation of same, are incorporated herein by this reference. Upon request by City, Consultant shall meet and confer in good faith with City for the purpose of resolving any dispute over the terms of this Agreement. 6.5 Governing Law/Venue. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Any action arising under or relating to this Agreement shall be brought only in San Diego County, State of California. 6.6 Service of Process.Consultant agrees that it is subject to personal jurisdiction in California. If Consultant is a foreign corporation, limited liability company, or partnership that is not registered with the California Secretary of State, Consultant irrevocably consents to service of process on Consultant by first class mail directed to the individual and address listed under “For Legal Notice,” in section 1.B. of Exhibit A to this Agreement, and that such service shall be effective five days after mailing. 151 ?City of Chula Vista Agreement No.: 180691 Consultant Name: Chen Ryan Associates, Inc.Rev. 10/24/17 7.OWNERSHIP AND USE OF WORK PRODUCT All reports, studies, information, data, statistics, forms, designs, plans, procedures, systems and any other materials or properties produced in whole or in part under this Agreement in connection with the performance of the Required Services (collectively “Work Product”) shall be the sole and exclusive property of City. No such Work Product shall be subject to private use, copyrights or patent rights by Consultant in the United States or in any other country without the express, prior written consent of City. City shall have unrestricted authority to publish, disclose, distribute, and otherwise use, copyright or patent, in whole or in part, any such Work Product, without requiring any permission of Consultant, except as may be limited by the provisions of the Public Records Act or expressly prohibited by other applicable laws. With respect to computer files containing data generated as Work Product, Consultant shall make available to City, upon reasonable written request by City, the necessary functional computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring and printing computer files. 8. GENERAL PROVISIONS 8.1 Amendment. This Agreement may be amended, but only in writing signed by both Parties. 8.2 Assignment. City would not have entered into this Agreement but for Consultant’s unique qualifications and traits. Consultant shall not assign any of its rights or responsibilities under this Agreement, nor any part hereof, without City’s prior written consent, which City may grant, condition or deny in its sole discretion. 8.3 Authority. The person(s) executing this Agreement for Consultant warrants and represents that they have the authority to execute same on behalf of Consultant and to bind Consultant to its obligations hereunder without any further action or direction from Consultant or any board, principle or officer thereof. 8.4 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which shall constitute one Agreement after each Party has signed such a counterpart. 8.5 Entire Agreement. This Agreement together with all exhibits attached hereto and other agreements expressly referred to herein, constitutes the entire Agreement between the Parties with respect to the subject matter contained herein. All exhibits referenced herein shall be attached hereto and are incorporated herein by reference. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations,warranties and statements, oral or written, are superseded. 8.6 Record Retention. During the course of the Agreement and for three (3) years following completion of the Required Services,Consultant agrees to maintain, intact and readily accessible, all data, documents, reports, records, contracts, and supporting materials relating to the performance of the Agreement, including accounting for costs and expenses charged to City, including such records in the possession of sub- contractors/sub-consultants. 8.7 Further Assurances. The Parties agree to perform such further acts and to execute and deliver such additional documents and instruments as may be reasonably required in order to carry out the provisions of this Agreement and the intentions of the Parties. 8.8 Independent Contractor. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to City a wholly independent contractor. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees, agents or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant’s officers, employees, or agents (“Consultant Related 152 ?City of Chula Vista Agreement No.: 180691 Consultant Name: Chen Ryan Associates, Inc.Rev. 10/24/17 Individuals”), except as set forth in this Agreement. No Consultant Related Individuals shall be deemed employees of City, and none of them shall be entitled to any benefits to which City employees are entitled, including but not limited to, overtime, retirement benefits, worker's compensation benefits, injury leave or other leave benefits. Furthermore, City will not withhold state or federal income tax, social security tax or any other payroll tax with respect to any Consultant Related Individuals; instead, Consultant shall be solely responsible for the payment of same and shall hold the City harmless with respect to same. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its Consultant Related Individuals are employees or agents of City. Consultant shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatsoever against City, or bind City in any manner. 8.9 Notices. All notices, demands or requests provided for or permitted to be given pursuant to this Agreement must be in writing. All notices, demands and requests to be sent to any Party shall be deemed to have been properly given or served if personally served or deposited in the United States mail, addressed to such Party, postage prepaid, registered or certified, with return receipt requested, at the addresses identified in this Agreement at the places of business for each of the designated Parties as indicated in Exhibit A, or otherwise provided in writing. (End of page. Next page is signature page.) 153 ??City of Chula Vista Agreement No.: 180691 Consultant Name: Chen Ryan Associates, Inc.Rev. 10/24/17 SIGNATURE PAGE CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT IN WITNESS WHEREOF, by executing this Agreement where indicated below, City and Consultant agree that they have read and understood all terms and conditions of the Agreement, that they fully agree and consent to bound by same, and that they are freely entering into this Agreement as of the Effective Date. CHEN RYAN ASSOCIATES, INC.CITY OF CHULA VISTA BY:________________________________BY: ________________________________ Monique Chen MARY CASILLAS SALAS Project Manager and Principal MAYOR ATTEST1 BY: ________________________________ Kerry K. Bigelow, MMC City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM BY: ________________________________ Glen R. Googins City Attorney 1 Attestation signature only required if the Mayor signs the Agreement. If Mayor is not signing agreement, delete entire attestation signature block.154 ??City of Chula Vista Agreement No.: 180691 Consultant Name: Chen Ryan Associates, Inc.Rev. 10/24/17 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF WORK AND PAYMENT TERMS 1.Contact People for Contract Administration and Legal Notice A.City Contract Administration: Patrick Moneda, PE, TE –Senior Civil Engineer 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 91910 (619) 407-3512 pmoneda@chulavistaca.gov For Legal Notice Copy to: City of Chula Vista City Attorney 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 91910 619-691-5037 CityAttorney@chulavistaca.gov B.Consultant Contract Administration: CHEN RYAN ASSOCIATES, INC. 3900 Fifth Avenue, Suite 310, San Diego, CA 92103 (619) 795-6086 mchen@chenryanmobility.com For Legal Notice Copy to: Monique Chen, PE –Project Manager and Principal 3900 Fifth Avenue, Suite 310 (619) 795-6086 mchen@chenryanmobility.com 2.Required Services A.General Description: The main task of the Consultant is to prepare a Multi-Modal Pedestrian/Bikeway Master Plan (Plan). The plan will provide a single document that will address the need for pedestrian and bicycle facilities in Chula Vista, using previous City plans. The Plan will consider interconnectivity between various pedestrian,bicycle and transit facilities. The Plan will also include recommendations for various modes of “sharable” transportation and recent advancements in automated transit systems that considers future development citywide. Public comment will be obtained through a stakeholders’ group, community workshops and a questionnaire/survey. Once the Plan is complete, staff intends to use it as a guideline for future Capital Improvement Program (CIP) projects. B.Detailed Description: 155 ??City of Chula Vista Agreement No.: 180691 Consultant Name: Chen Ryan Associates, Inc.Rev. 10/24/17 In order to meet the general description, the Consultant shall furnish all services as required. Such services shall, at a minimum, include the following: Task Description Deliverables Completion Date A Develop Timeline and Public Involvement Plan 1)Kickoff Meeting and Project Schedule 2) Public Involvement Plan 3) Invoicing and Quarterly Reports December 31, 2018 B Prepare Status Report on Existing Conditions 1)Document Review 2) Data Collection 3) Safety Analysis 4) Network Quality Assessment 5) Demand Assessment 6) Existing Conditions Report April 30, 2019 C Conduct City Staff Meetings and Stakeholders’ Meetings 1) City Staff Meetings 2) Stakeholders’ Working Group Meetings August 31, 2019 D Conduct Public Meetings and Other Public Participation Efforts 1) Public Meetings 2) Supplemental Engagement October 31, 2019 E Prepare Draft Plan 1) Emerging Mobility Assessment 2) Prepare Draft Plan September 30, 2019 F Present Report to Safety Commission and City Council 1) Present Report to Safety Commission 2) Present Report to City Council October 31, 2019 G Prepare Final Plan 1) Final Multimodal Pedestrian/Bikeway Master Plan 2) Active Transportation Program Application December 31, 2019 H Environmental Clearance (Optional) To be negotiated at a later date.To be determined. 3.Term:In accordance with Section 1.10 of this Agreement, the term of this Agreement shall begin August 14, 2018 and end on December 31, 2019 for completion of all Required Services. 4. Compensation: A.Form of Compensation ⾙ Fixed Fee Paid in Increments. The Consultant will provide the City with monthly invoices, that will include a cover sheet, detailed description of work completed, copies of all reimbursable expense receipts, and subconsultant invoices. For the completion of each Deliverable of the Required Services,as identified in section 2.B., above, City shall pay the fixed fee associated with each Deliverable, in the amounts set forth below: 156 ??City of Chula Vista Agreement No.: 180691 Consultant Name: Chen Ryan Associates, Inc.Rev. 10/24/17 Task No.Deliverable Amount A 1) Kickoff Meeting and Project Schedule 2) Public Involvement Plan 3) Invoicing and Quarterly Reports $16,835 B 1) Document Review 2) Data Collection 3) Safety Analysis 4) Network Quality Assessment 5) Demand Assessment 6) Existing Conditions Report $35,640 C 1) City Staff Meetings 2) Stakeholders’ Working Group Meetings $21,465 D 1) Public Meetings 2) Supplemental Engagement $53,800 E 1) Emerging Mobility Assessment 2) Prepare Draft Plan $74,080 F 1) Present Report to Safety Commission 2) Present Report to City Council $6,560 G 1) Final Multimodal Pedestrian/Bikeway Master Plan 2) Active Transportation Program Application $41,460 H To be negotiated at a later date.N/A B.Reimbursement of Costs ⾙ None, the compensation includes all costs ☐Invoiced or agreed-upon amounts as follows: Enter or Attach And Reference Any Agreed-Upon Cost Reimbursements Notwithstanding the foregoing, the maximum amount to be paid to the Consultant for services performed through Enter End of Contract Date shall not exceed Enter Amount. 5.Special Provisions: ⾙ Permitted Sub-Consultants: MIG, Inc.; RECON Environmental, Inc. ☐Security for Performance: None ☐Notwithstanding the completion date set forth in Section 3 above, City has option to extend this Agreement for Insert Number of Terms additional terms, defined as a one-year increment or Enter a Specific Date. if applicable. The City Manager or Director of Finance/Treasurer shall be authorized to exercise the extensions on behalf of the City. If the City exercises an option to extend, each extension shall be on the same terms and conditions contained herein, provided that the amounts specified in Section 4 above may be increased by up to Insert Percentage of Increase or Actual Dollar Amount for each extension. The City shall give written notice to 157 ??City of Chula Vista Agreement No.: 180691 Consultant Name: Chen Ryan Associates, Inc.Rev. 10/24/17 Consultant of the City’s election to exercise the extension via the Notice of Exercise of Option to Extend document. ☐ None 158 ??City of Chula Vista Agreement No.: 180691 Consultant Name: Chen Ryan Associates, Inc.Rev. 10/24/17 EXHIBIT B INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS Consultant shall adhere to all terms and conditions of Section 3 of the Agreement and agrees to provide the following types and minimum amounts of insurance, as indicated by checking the applicable boxes (x). Type of Insurance Minimum Amount Form ⾙ General Liability: Including products and completed operations, personal and advertising injury $2,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury (including death), and property damage. If Commercial General Liability insurance with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit must apply separately to this Agreement or the general aggregate limit must be twice the required occurrence limit Additional Insured Endorsement or Blanket AI Endorsement for City* Waiver of Recovery Endorsement Insurance Services Office Form CG 00 01 *Must be primary and must not exclude Products/Completed Operations ⾙ Automobile Liability $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury, including death, and property damage Insurance Services Office Form CA 00 01 Code 1-Any Auto Code 8-Hired Code 9-Non Owned ⾙ Workers’ Compensation Employer’s Liability $1,000,000 each accident $1,000,000 disease policy limit $1,000,000 disease each employee Waiver of Recovery Endorsement ⾙ Professional Liability (Errors & Omissions) $1,000,000 each occurrence $2,000,000 aggregate Other Negotiated Insurance Terms: NONE 159 ??City of Chula Vista Agreement No.: 180691 Consultant Name: Chen Ryan Associates, Inc.Rev. 10/24/17 EXHIBIT C CONSULTANT CONFLICT OF INTEREST DESIGNATION The Political Reform Act2 and the Chula Vista Conflict of Interest Code3 (“Code”) require designated state and local government officials, including some consultants, to make certain public disclosures using a Statement of Economic Interests form (Form 700).Once filed, a Form 700 is a public document, accessible to any member of the public. In addition, consultants designated to file the Form 700 are also required to comply with certain ethics training requirements.4 ⾙ A. Consultant IS a corporation or limited liability company and is therefore EXCLUDED5 from disclosure. ☐B. Consultant NOT a corporation or limited liability company and disclosure designation is as follows: APPLICABLE DESIGNATIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL(S) ASSIGNED TO PROVIDE SERVICES (Category descriptions available at www.chulavistaca.gov/departments/city-clerk/conflict-of-interest-code.) Name Email Address Applicable Designation Enter Name of Each Individual Who Will Be Providing Service Under the Contract –If individuals have different disclosure requirements, duplicate this row and complete separately for each individual Enter email address(es)☐A. Full Disclosure ☐B. Limited Disclosure (select one or more of the categories under which the consultant shall file): ☐1. ☐2. ☐3. ☐4. ☐5. ☐6. ☐7. Justification: ☐C. Excluded from Disclosure 1.Required Filers Each individual who will be performing services for the City pursuant to the Agreement and who meets the definition of “Consultant,” pursuant to FPPC Regulation 18700.3, must file a Form 700. 2.Required Filing Deadlines Each initial Form 700 required under this Agreement shall be filed with the Office of the City Clerk via the City's online filing system, NetFile, within 30 days of the approval of the Agreement. Additional Form 700 filings will be required annually on April 1 during the term of the Agreement, and within 30 days of the termination of the Agreement. 3. Filing Designation The City Department Director will designate each individual who will be providing services to the City pursuant to the Agreement as full disclosure, limited disclosure, or excluded from disclosure, based on an analysis of the services the Consultant will provide. Notwithstanding this designation or anything in the Agreement, the Consultant is ultimately responsible for complying with FPPC regulations and filing requirements. If you have any questions regarding filing requirements, please do not hesitate to contact the City Clerk at (619)691-5041, or the FPPC at 1- 866-ASK-FPPC, or (866) 275-3772 *2. Pursuant to the duly adopted City of Chula Vista Conflict of Interest Code, this document shall serve as the written determination of the consultant’s requirement to comply with the disclosure requirements set forth in the Code. Completed by: Patrick Moneda, Senior Civil Engineer 2 Cal. Gov. Code §§81000 et seq.; FPPC Regs. 18700.3 and 18704. 3 Chula Vista Municipal Code §§2.02.010-2.02.040. 4 Cal. Gov. Code §§53234, et seq. 5 CA FPPC Adv. A-15-147 (Chadwick) (2015); Davis v. Fresno Unified School District (2015) 237 Cal.App.4th 261; FPPC Reg. 18700.3 (Consultant defined as an “individual” who participates in making a governmental decision; “individual” does not include corporation or limited liability company).160 C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@7C093AD8\@BCL@7C093AD8.docx RESOLUTION NO. __________ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING AN AGREEMENT FOR THE PREPARATION OF A MULTI-MODAL PEDESTRIAN/ BIKEWAY MASTER PLAN BETWEEN THE CITY AND CHEN RYAN ASSOCIATES, INC. (CIP# STL0404) WHEREAS, the City was awarded a SANDAG Active Transportation Grant – Cycle 3 for the preparation of the City’s Multi-Modal Pedestrian/Bikeway Master Plan; and WHEREAS, the Master Plan will focus on interconnectivity between various pedestrian/bicycle facilities and transit; and WHEREAS, on November 15, 2017, the City received six (6) proposals and was ranked as shown in the table below. RANK CONSULTANT (LOCATION)FEE ESTIMATE 1 Chen Ryan Associates, Inc. (San Diego, CA)$249,140.00 2 IBI Group (San Diego, CA)$249,946.00 3 KTUA (San Diego, CA)$252,630.00 4 KOA Corporation (San Diego, CA)$347,395.00 5 Alta Planning + Design (San Diego, CA)$349,286.00 6 Fehr & Peers (San Diego, CA)$238,302.00 WHEREAS, selection panel interviewed all the above listed consultants on December 12- 13, 2017; and WHEREAS, staff recommended that the contract be awarded to Chen Ryan Associates, Inc. based on the qualifications of the project team, their understanding of the work to be done, and their knowledge and focus on newer modes of transportation; and WHEREAS, staff met and negotiated with Chen Ryan Associates, Inc. and the final proposed cost of the contract had a nominal increase of $700 to a total of $249,840.00. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, that it approves the agreement for the preparation of a Multi-Modal Pedestrian/Bikeway Master Plan between the City and Chen Ryan Associates, Inc., in the form presented, with such minor modifications as may be required or approved by the City Attorney, a copy of which shall be kept on file in the Office of the City Engineer,and authorizes and directs the Mayor to execute same. 161 Resolution No. Page 2 Presented by William S. Valle Director of Engineering and Approved as to form by Glen R. Googins City Attorney Capital Projects 162 P a g e | 1 August 14, 2018 File ID: 18-0189 TITLE RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE SUBMITTAL OF GRANT APPLICATIONS FOR THE HIGHWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - CYCLE 9 THROUGH CALTRANS, AND STATING THE CITY'S ASSURANCE TO COMPLETE THE PROJECTS RECOMMENDED ACTION Council adopt the resolution. SUMMARY In the interest of obtaining federal grant funding to improve the safety of motorists, bicyclists and pedestriansof the City, staff is requesting authorization to fileHighway Safety Improvement Program –Cycle 9 grant applications for the following prospective projects: 1) Pedestrian Improvements on Quintard Street, 2) Traffic Signal Pedestrian Improvements and Modifications at Various Locations; and 3) Uncontrolled Pedestrian Crossing Improvements at Various Locations. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Director of Development Services has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the project qualifies for a Categorical Exemption pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 Class 1 (Existing Facilities) and/or Section 15303 class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures) because the proposed project would not result in a significant effect on the environment, create a cumulative impact, damage a scenic highway, or cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. Thus, no further environmental review is required BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION Not applicable. DISCUSSION On April 30, 2018, the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and the Federal Highway Association announced the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) - Cycle 9 Call for Projects. The purpose of the HSIP is to achieve a significant reduction in fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads. This call for projects is targeted for approximately $140M to $160Min Federal funding. 163 P a g e | 2 Staff requests authorization to apply for grant funding of the following prospective projects for HSIP -Cycle 9: Proposed Project 1: PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS ON QUINTARD STREET Project Location: Quintard Street (Third Avenue to Hilltop Drive) Project Description: Quintard Street from Third Avenue to Hilltop Drive is a significant vehicle and pedestrian corridordue to the proximity of both Castle Park Middle and High Schools. School traffic strains existing pedestrian facilities, making the location a strong candidate for the HSIP grant. The following improvements are proposed with this project: upgrades to the existing traffic signalsatthe intersections of Quintard Street at Third Avenue,and Quintard Street at Hilltop Drive, approximately 485 feet of new sidewalk on the south side of Quintard Street from Third Avenue eastward, and upgrade pedestrian ramps to current ADA standards at Quintard Street and Hilltop Drive in front of Castle Park High School. Staff intends to apply for HSIP funding for preliminary engineering (PE), right-of-way acquisition (R/W) and construction (CON) phases. Per HSIP requirements for the proposed project, 10 percent of the total project cost will be identified as local match funds. Total - Approximate Cost:$800,000(PE, R/W, CON) Approximate Contribution: $720,000(HSIP)/$80,000 (Local) Proposed Project 2: TRAFFIC SIGNAL PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS AND MODIFICATIONS Project Location: Various locations Citywide Project Description: Lead Pedestrian Interval (LPI) timing is a countermeasure that HSIP introduced for Cycle 9. LPI’s purpose is to give pedestrians a 3 to 7-second “head start” to help cross the street at signalized locations with higher potential of conflict with red light/yield turning vehicular traffic. This project proposes to include LPI at such signalized locationsthroughout the Citywith a significant history of pedestrian incidents, and will include associated equipment and intersection striping upgrades to better serve pedestrians at these locations as well as upgrades to support protected left turning movements at select intersections. Staff intends to apply for HSIP funding for PE and CON phases. 164 P a g e | 3 Total - Approximate Cost:$2,400,000 (PE, CON) Approximate Contribution: $2,400,000 (HSIP) Proposed Project 3: UNCONTROLLED PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGIMPROVEMENTS Project Location: Various locations Citywide Project Description: To improve the safety of pedestrians crossing at uncontrolled marked crosswalk locations, this project proposes to install pedestrian-activated rectangular rapid flashing beacons (RRFB’s) at select locations Citywide. Locations will be based on pedestrianincident history and the proximity of pedestrian generating facilities. Candidate locations are included in Attachment 1. Staff intends to apply forHSIP funding for PE and CON phases. Total - Approximate Cost:$270,000(PE, CON) Approximate Contribution: $270,000 (HSIP) DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT Project Location 1 Staff has reviewed the property holdings of the City Council members and has found no property holdings within 500 feet of the boundaries of the property which is the subject of this action. Consequently, this item does not present a disqualifying real property-related financial conflict of interest under California Code of Regulations Title 2, section 18702.2(a)(11), for purposes of the Political Reform Act (Cal. Gov’t Code §87100,et seq.). Staff is not independently aware, and has not been informed by any City Council member, of any other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter. Project Locations 2 & 3 Staff has reviewed the decision contemplated by this action and has determined that it is not site-specific and consequently, the 500-foot rule found in California Code of Regulations Title 2, section 18702.2(a)(11), is not applicable to this decision for purposes of determining a disqualifying real property-related financial conflict of interest under the Political Reform Act (Cal. Gov't Code § 87100, et seq.). Staff is not independently aware, and has not been informed by any City Council member, of any other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter. LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS The City’s Strategic Plan has five major goals: Operational Excellence, Economic Vitality, Healthy Community, Strong and Secure Neighborhoods and a Connected Community. The proposed projects support the Strong 165 P a g e | 4 and Secure Neighborhoods goal. These projects promotesafertravel for all modes of transportationthrough Chula Vista’s roadways. CURRENT-YEAR FISCAL IMPACT The identifiedmatching funds were budgeted as part of the FY 2018/19 CIP Program. There is no impact to the General Fund. If any of the grants are awarded, staff will return to City Council with a recommendation to accept and appropriate the funds. ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT Upon construction completion, the projects will require routine maintenance. ATTACHMENTS 1.Candidate Locations –Uncontrolled Pedestrian Crossing Improvements Project Staff Contact: Patrick C. Moneda, Senior Civil Engineer 166 School Street 1 Bonita Vista Middle Ridgeback Road 2 Hilltop Middle E. J Street (2 crossings) 3 Hilltop High E. I Street (2 crossings) 4 Palomar Elementary Oleander Avenue 5 Valley Lindo Elementary Oleander Avenue 6 Olympic View Elementary S. Greensview Drive 7 Rohr Elementary Malta Avenue 8 Mueller Elementary I Street 9 Park View Elementary Juniper Street 10 Feaster Elementary Flower Street 11 Loma Verde Elementary Loma View Lane 12 Castle Park Elementary Emerson Street 13 Montgomery Elementary Anita Street 14 Discovery Elementary Camino Biscay; Rancho del Rey Parkway 15 Clearview Elementary Windrose Way 16 Chula Vista Hill Elementary Buena Vista Way (2 crossings) Uncontrolled Sidewalk Improvements Candidate Locationsa Notes: a. Candidate locations are to be included as budget allows. 167 RESOLUTION NO. __________ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE SUBMITTAL OF GRANT APPLICATIONS FOR THE HIGHWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM -CYCLE 9 THROUGH CALTRANS, AND STATING THE CITY'S ASSURANCE TO COMPLETE THE PROJECTS WHEREAS, on April 30, 2018, the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and the Federal Highway Association announced the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) - Cycle 9 Call for Projects; and WHEREAS, this Call for Projects is targeted for approximately $140M to $160M in Federal funding; and WHEREAS, the purpose of the HSIP is to achieve a significant reduction in fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads; and WHEREAS, for a project to be eligible, a specific problem must be identified for correction and the proposed countermeasure must correct or substantially improve the condition users; and WHEREAS, it is recommended that the City apply for grant funding of the following three (3) projects: Grant Program Project Name Estimated Total Project Cost Approximate Grant Request Matching Funds HSIP – Cycle 9 1) Pedestrian Improvements on Quintard Street $800,000 $720,000 $80,000 2) Traffic Signal Pedestrian Improvements and Modifications $2,400,000 $2,400,000 - 3) Uncontrolled Pedestrian Crossing Improvements $270,000 $270,000 - NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, that it approve the submittal of grant applications for the Highway Safety Improvement Program – Cycle 9 through Caltrans, and state the City’s assurance to complete the projects. Presented by Approved as to form by William S. Valle Glen R. Googins Director of Engineering &City Attorney Capital Projects 168 P a g e | 1 August 14, 2018 File ID: 18-0257 TITLE A. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE PARK MASTER PLAN AND THE NAME FOR THE 7.5-ACRE NEIGHBORHOOD PARK P-1 LOCATED IN OTAY RANCH VILLAGE 3 B. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING A FIRST AMENDMENT TO AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND HOMEFED VILLAGE III MASTER, LLC. FOR CONSTRUCTION OF NEIGHBORHOOD PARK P-1 IN OTAY RANCH VILLAGE 3 AND A PORTION OF COMMUNITY PARK P-2 IN OTAY RANCH VILLAGE 4 AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS THEREFOR (4/5 VOTE REQUIRED) C. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING A REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND HOMEFED VILLAGE III MASTER, LLC. FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF NEIGHBORHOOD PARK P-1 IN OTAY RANCH VILLAGE 3 RECOMMENDED ACTION Council adopt the resolutions. SUMMARY This report presents (A) the Park Master Plan and park name “Escaya Park” for the 7.5-acre Neighborhood Park P-1 (Project) located in Otay Ranch Village 3 North; (B) a First Amendment to the Agreement Regarding Construction of Neighborhood Park P-1 in Otay Ranch Village 3 and a Portion of Community Park P-2 in Otay Ranch Village 4 (First Amendment to the Parks Agreement) and the appropriation of $500,000 from the Parkland Acquisition and Development (PAD) fund; and (C) a Reimbursement Agreement for the Construction of Neighborhood Park P-1 in Otay Ranch Village 3 (Reimbursement Agreement). ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Director of Development Services has determined the project was adequately covered in the previously adopted Final Environmental Impact Report, EIR-13-01. Therefore, no additional environmental review is required. 169 P a g e | 2 BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION On June 21, 2018 the City of Chula Vista Parks and Recreation Commission voted unanimously (5-0, 2 members absent) in favor of recommending that the City Council approve the Park Master Plan for the 7.5- acre Neighborhood Park P-1 located in Otay Ranch Village 3 North and the park name “Escaya Park”. The Parks and Recreation Commissioners would like the design team to consider the following items during the design development of the park: (1) Re-orient the basketball court and/or adjust the location of the basketball court to provide a larger expanse of turf area in the southwest corner of the park site; and (2) move the 10’ wide path to provide additional space for spectators around the field turfs (Attachment 1, Parks and Recreation Commission meeting minutes). DISCUSSION Background The Sectional Planning Area (SPA) plan for Village 3 North and a Portion of Village 4 was adopted by City Council on December 13, 2016 via Resolution No. 16-0591 and Ordinance No. 3396. The approved SPA plan includes a Village 3 North Neighborhood Park (P-1) Concept Plan from which the draft Park Master Plan was prepared. The Project site is located within Village 3 just west of Avenida Escaya between Camino Aldea and Camino Prado (Attachment 2). The site has a gross acreage of 8.1-acres and a net acreage of 7.5-acres. The site was offered for dedication to the City of Chula Vista on Final Subdivision Map No. 16160 recorded at the County Recorder’s Office on November 30, 2016. Parks Agreement Otay Ranch Village 3 (a.k.a. the Village of Escaya) meets its park obligations, as stated in Chapter 17.10 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code (Municipal Code), through a combination of parkland dedication, parkland development improvements, and payment of in-lieu fees. The specific methods for satisfying the Village 3 park obligations are stated in the Agreement Regarding Construction of Neighborhood Park P-1 in Otay Ranch Village 3 and a portion of Community Park P-2 in Otay Ranch Village 4, approved via Resolution No. 2016-257 on December 06, 2016. That agreement notes the Master Developer will satisfy a portion of its park requirements by providing a neighborhood park through the “turnkey” method whereby the developer designs and constructs the park on behalf of the City in lieu of paying park development fees. The agreement also documents in detail the provisions for how the “turnkey” neighborhood park is to be delivered by the Master Developer. The agreement states the Master Developer shall use the City’s customary procedures to design and obtain City approval of the draft Park Master Plan and subsequent park construction documents. The agreement also states that improvements for the neighborhood park shall be consistent with the approved SPA plan and the Village 3 North Neighborhood Park (P-1) Concept Plan. The Master Developer has entered into an agreement with DeLorenzo International to design a Park Master Plan and prepare park construction documents for deliverance of the Neighborhood Park (P-1). 170 P a g e | 3 Draft Park Master Plan Concept The Park Master Plan Concept (Attachment 3) has been designed to serve the recreational needs of the neighboring residents and likewise provide a community gathering space. The park site is located within walking distance of the development’s Village Core and provides connections to its network of village pathways and trails. The park site also provides convenient access with residential streets on the North, South, and East perimeters of the park. These adjacent streets include on-street parallel parking with direct access to the park site. Additionally, the park site is located in proximity to an elementary school that would allow opportunities for shared recreational activities. The park site is spread out across a large sloped area that provides excellent views to the west and to the south. At the high point of the park in the northeast corner of the site is an overlook picnic area. This picnic area includes 4 picnic tables and 2 benches that capture the excellent view shed. This overlook picnic area is also located just off Avenida Escaya, one of the central prominent streets within Village 3. Therefore, the overlook is also designed as a landmark entry feature with a primary monument sign and accent planting that reinforces a pedestrian connection between the Village Core and the park site. Just below the overlook picnic area is a broad level area designed for a large open active recreation turf area. The large open turf area supports a number of different age related soccer fields, allowing six soccer fields for ages 6 and under, or four soccer fields for ages 8 and under, or one soccer field for ages 11 and under. The large open turf area will also include sports field lighting to allow extended scheduling opportunities for youth soccer leagues or other sports leagues requiring active recreation turf areas. Just west of the open turf area is a large 4:1 sloped lawn area that is designed as an outdoor amphitheater space for outdoor concerts, movies in the park, or other community gathering events. Along the top of this slope is a 10’ wide access and maintenance path. Near the bottom of the slope is a small set up area with space for outdoor movies screens, a concrete pad for movie projectors, a 240V power panel for audio-visual equipment, and an ADA accessible viewing area. Any privately programmed outdoor concerts, movies in the park, or other community gathering events would be responsible for providing all necessary event equipment and must receive all permissions and permits from the City of Chula Vista prior to the event. The low point of the site is located in the southwest corner of the park and consists of a relatively large level area. This lower level area provides a number of smaller passive recreation lawn spaces for informal play and general park use. It also includes a number of programmed activity spaces such as a children’s play area, basketball court, and group picnic area. These programmed areas are all connected by a 10’ wide west walk loop designed to include accent trees and pedestrian scale lighting. The parking area and comfort station also occur adjacent to the west walk loop. Park Amenities The design of the park site consists of the following elements: •Multi-purpose field with sports lighting •Group picnic area with a 24’x34’ shade structure, 6 picnic tables, 4 barbeques, trash receptacles, and hot ash containers. 171 P a g e | 4 •Basketball court that also includes striping for two pickleball courts. •Children’s play area with a play element for children between the ages of 2-5, a play element for children between the ages of 5-12, swings, and a balance element. •Outdoor amphitheater space. •Overlook picnic area with 4 picnic tables, 2 benches and trash receptacles. •Small picnic area and bounce house set up area that includes 4 picnic tables, 2 barbeques, trash receptacles, and hot ash containers. •10’ wide West Walk Loop with site lighting. •Comfort station per City of Chula Vista Parks Department’s Prototype A. •Parking lot (7 Standard stalls, 2 ADA stalls). •Trash enclosure (Trash, Recycle, Green Waste). Community Outreach City Staff held a public community outreach meeting on May 09, 2018 at the Village of Escaya Welcome Center located within the Village 3 development. During this meeting, City Staff first discussed the various planning related documents that culminated in the approval of the Otay Ranch Village 3 North and a Portion of Village 4 SPA plan. The Landscape Architect for the Project presented the preliminary draft Park Master Plan and discussed the various amenities proposed within the plan. The public community outreach meeting was well attended with 13 attendees signing in at the meeting. Many of the attendees were current residents within the Village of Escaya. Neighborhood Park Budget The Neighborhood Park Budget is established by the current development fee per acre times the number of net acres of Project site. Therefore, the Neighborhood Park Budget as defined by the Parks Agreement is $4,109,700 ($547,960 development fee x 7.5 acres). City Staff worked with the Master Developer to design a park master plan consistent with the Village 3 North Neighborhood Park (P-1) Concept Plan included in the Project’s approved SPA plan. However, due to increased construction costs, the PAD fee amounts used to establish the previously mentioned Neighborhood Park Budget did not adequately cover the estimated probable costs to construct a neighborhood park consistent with the Concept Plan. The draft Park Master Plan Statement of Probable Cost prepared by the Master Developer’s cost estimator noted a total estimated cost of $5,078,874 (Attachment 4). First Amendmentto the Parks Agreement As a result of the difference between the Neighborhood Park Budget and the total estimated cost noted in the draft Park Master Plan Statement of Probable Cost, the City and Master Developer have agreed to supplement the Neighborhood Park Budget by each contributing additional funds. The additional funds are intended to assure the neighborhood park is designed to provide a minimal level of park amenities consistent with the Village 3 North Neighborhood Park (P-1) Concept Plan and likewise support the needs assessment outlined in the draft of the citywide Park and Recreation Master Plan. As outlined in the First Amendment to the Parks Agreement (Attachment 5), the City and Master Developer have each agreed to 172 P a g e | 5 contribute up to $500,000 for a combined total of up to $1,000,000, in addition to the Neighborhood Park Budget established by the development fees. The additional funds to be contributed by the Developer will not be eligible for credit against their PAD fee obligation. Staff recommends utilizing a portion of the available Olympic Pointe Park Funds as the City’s contribution of $500,000 toward the Neighborhood Park Budget. Pursuant to Resolution 2006-191, the Olympic Pointe Park Funds were previously collected by the City for use on any park or public facility serving eastern territories of Chula Vista. The agreement to supplement the Neighborhood Park Budget in this manner is a one-time agreement and applies only to parkland improvements and construction costs for the Project’s 7.5-acres. Reimbursement Agreement As a means of providing the Master Developer with the City’s portion of additional Neighborhood Park Budget funds, the City and Master Developer have agreed to a Reimbursement Agreement (Attachment 6). In accordance with the Reimbursement Agreement, the City shall reimburse the Master Developer for fifty percent (50%) of the construction costs incurred in excess of the Neighborhood Park Budget, in an amount not to exceed $500,000. Next Steps At the time of this agenda item, the City Council will have previously considered an update to the development component of the City’s PAD Fee. The budget shortfalls described above illustrate the need for an increase to the PAD development fee and Escaya Park served as one of the three prototypical parks used to develop the proposed PAD development fee update. Pending approval by City Council, the updated PAD development fee will support both the provision of turnkey parks with appropriate park amenities and the payment of sufficient parkland development in-lieu fees. DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT Staff has reviewed the property holdings of the City Council members and has found no property holdings within 500 feet of the boundaries of the property which is the subject of this action. Consequently, this item does not present a disqualifying real property-related financial conflict of interest under California Code of Regulations Title 2, section 18702.2(a)(11), for purposes of the Political Reform Act (Cal. Gov’t Code §87100,et seq.). Staff is not independently aware, and has not been informed by any City Council member, of any other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter. LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS The City’s Strategic Plan has five major goals: Operational Excellence, Economic Vitality, Healthy Community, Strong and Secure Neighborhoods and a Connected Community. The proposed Village 3 North Neighborhood Park (P-1) plan addresses the Healthy Community and Connected Community goals as it seeks to provide recreational opportunities and community gathering space for residents. 173 P a g e | 6 CURRENT-YEAR FISCAL IMPACT The City’s will contribute $500,000 toward the Park budget from the Olympic Pointe Park Funds as outlined in the First Amendment to the Parks Agreement. All costs associated with the preparation of this staff report and associated documents are borne by the developer, resulting in no net fiscal impact to the General Fund or Development Services Fund. ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT The park is being provided as a turnkey park whereby the developer designs and constructs the park on behalf of the City. There will be no ongoing capital cost to the City for the design and construction of this park. However, the City’s General Fund will be responsible for the annual ongoing cost per acre for maintenance of the park. At an average cost of $14,050 per acre per year to maintain a park, the estimated annual cost to maintain Escaya Park is $113,805. This estimated cost per acre for maintenance accounts for Escaya Park’s gross acreage of 8.1 acres.The budget for the development of the park is $5,109,700 ($4,460,950 construction costs and $648,750 soft costs.) The current costs estimate for design and construction of the park prepared by the Master Developer’s cost estimator is $5,078,874. The cost estimate does not include costs to develop the 0.6-acres of non-credited park areas in excess of a 4:1 slope. The cost to develop those slope areas is to be incurred by the Master Developer. ATTACHMENTS 1. Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting Minutes 2. Vicinity Map 3. Draft Park Master Plan 4. Statement of Probable Cost 5. First Amendment to the Agreement Regarding Construction of Neighborhood Park P-1 in Otay Ranch Village 3 and a Portion of Community Park P-2 in Otay Ranch Village 4 6. Reimbursement Agreement for the Construction of Neighborhood Park P-1 in Otay Ranch Village 3 Staff Contact: Zach Tanner, Landscape Architect, Development Services Department (ztanner@chulavistaca.gov) 174 Page 1 | Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes June 21, 2018 MINUTES OF A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA June 21, 2018 6:30 p.m. A Special Meeting of the Parks and Recreation Commission of the City of Chula Vista was called to order at 6:33 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, located at 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, California. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Commissioners Buddingh, Garcia-Lopez, German (arrived at 6:36 p.m.), Zarem, and Chair Fernandez ABSENT: Commissioners Doyle and Gregorio ALSO PRESENT: Parks and Recreation Administrator Farmer, Assistant Director of Development Services Allen, Landscape Architects Caro and Tanner, CEO De Lorenzo (De Lorenzo International) PUBLIC COMMENTS There were none. CONSENT CALENDAR 1. APPROVAL OF MAY 17, 2018 SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES Staff recommendation: Commission approve the minutes 2. APPROVAL OF COMMISSIONER BUDDINGH’S ABSENCE FROM MAY 17, 2018, SPECIAL MEETING Staff recommendation: Commission excuse the absence 3. APPROVAL OF COMMISSIONER GARCIA-LOPEZ’S ABSENCE FROM MAY 17, 2018, SPECIAL MEETING Staff recommendation: Commission excuse the absence 4. APPROVAL OF CHAIR FERNANDEZ’S ABSENCE FROM MAY 17, 2018, SPECIAL MEETING Staff recommendation: Commission excuse the absence 175 Page 2 | Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes June 21, 2018 ACTION: Commissioner Garcia-Lopez moved to approve staff’s recommendations and offered Consent Calendar Items 1 through 4. Commissioner Zarem seconded the motion, and it carried by the following vote: Yes: 3 – Garica-Lopez, Fernandez, Zarem No: 0 Abstain: 1 – Buddingh ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR There were none. ACTION ITEMS 5. RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE CITYWIDE PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN UPDATE Landscape Architect Caro presented the citywide Parks and Recreation Master Plan Update. Background on the development of the master plan by City staff was provided. ACTION: Commissioner Buddingh moved to recommend to approve the draft citywide Parks and Recreation Master update. Commissioner Garcia-Lopez seconded the motion, and it carried by the following vote: Yes: 5 – Buddingh, Fernandez, Garcia-Lopez, German, Zarem No: 0 Abstain: 0 6. VILLAGE 3 P-1 NEIGHBORHOOD PARK Landscape Architect Caro presented the draft park Master Plan. Background on the development of the master plan by De Lorenzo International and City staff was provided. ACTION: Commissioner German moved to approve to recommend to City Council fiscal year 2018-2019 proposed budget for Parks and Recreation Division of Community Services Department. Commissioner Zarem seconded the motion, and it carried by the following vote: Yes: 5 – Buddingh, Fernandez, Garcia-Lopez, German, Zarem No: 0 Abstain: 0 7. RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL AGREEMENT WITH SEVEN MILE CASINO TO ALLOW USE OF THE PARKING LOT AT BAY BOULEVARD PARK IN EXCHANGE FOR PARK MAINTENANCE SERVICES 176 Page 3 | Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes June 21, 2018 Parks and Recreation Administrator Farmer presented the proposed agreement with Seven Mile Casino. ACTION: Commissioner Buddingh moved to recommend City Council approval of the agreement with Seven Mile Casino to use parking lot at Bay Boulevard in exchange for park maintenance services with the condition that a parking spot be dedicated for ADA parking and a Gambler’s Anonymous sign be posted in the parking lot. Commissioner Zarem seconded the motion, and it carried by the following vote: Yes: 5 – Buddingh, Fernandez, Garcia-Lopez, German, Zarem No: 0 Abstain: 0 8. NOMINATION OF UP TO THREE COMMISSIONERS TO SERVE ON THE MEASURE P CITIZEN’S OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE (“COC”) ACTION: Chair Fernandez moved to continue the item to the next meeting of the Parks and Recreation Commission. Commissioner Buddingh seconded the motion, and it carried by the following vote: Yes: 5 – Buddingh, Fernandez, Garcia-Lopez, German, Zarem No: 0 Abstain: 0 OTHER BUSINESS 9. STAFF COMMENTS Parks and Recreation Administrator Farmer provided an update on the Parks and Recreation division merger. He stated that new recreation software will be implemented in November. He also provided an update on joint use agreements with schools and that the Department is developing a blanket joint use agreement with Chula Vista Elementary School and will reach out to elementary schools, individually. 10. CHAIR’S COMMENTS Chair Fernandez thanked Commissioner Buddingh on his years of service on the Parks and Recreation Commission and presented Commissioner Buddingh with a card and certificate. 11. COMMISSIONERS’ COMMENTS Commissioner Buddingh thanked the fellow Commissioners and stated that it has been a pleasure serving and he is glad that the Parks and Recreation division is on the right track. Commissioner German thanked Commission Buddingh for his service. Commissioner German asked that an explanation as to why the City of Chula Vista is 177 Page 4 | Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes June 21, 2018 released from liability on the Southwestern College Recreational Facility’s waiver form be placed on the next meeting’s agenda. Commissioner Zarem asked for an update on the Norman Park Senior Center remodel. Parks and Recreation Administrator Farmer recommended that Commissioner Zarem contact the Public Works Department for an update. ADJOURNMENT At 7:42 p.m., Chair Fernandez adjourned the meeting to the next Regular Meeting on July 19, 2018, 6:30 p.m. at Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, California. ____________________________________ Tiffany Kellbach, Administrative Secretary 178 VICINITY MAP KEY MAP PARK SITE PARK SITE 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 DRAFT PARK MASTER PLANDate: May 22, 2018OTAY RANCH VILLAGE 3, PARK 1ESCAYA NEIGHBORHOOD PARKC-1187 PHONE: 858-485-6765 • FAX: 858-673-9263 Otay Ranch Village 3, Park 1 Chula Vista, California Master Plan Statement of Probable Cost May 10, 2018 Cumming Project No. #17-00696.00 Prepared for DeLorenzo International 15015 AVENUE OF SCIENCE, SUITE 160 • SAN DIEGO • CALIFORNIA • 92128 Escaya Park 188 Otay Ranch Village 3, Park 1 Chula Vista, California Project # #17-00696.00 Master Plan SOPC 05/10/18 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction This estimate has been prepared, pursuant to an agreement between DeLorenzo International and Cumming, for the purpose of establishing a probable cost of construction at the master plan stage. This project is the construction of Escaya Park in Chula Vista, California. The scope of work encompasses the construction of recreational sports fields, playground, picnic areas, comfort station, parking lot, landscaping and site utilities. Basis of Estimate This Statement of Probable Cost (SOPC), is based on a drawing package prepared by DeLorenzo International, received 03/20/18 , along with verbal direction. - Site Plan, 1 sheet Estimate Format A custom format has been used for the preparation of this estimate. Cost Mark Ups The following % mark ups have been included in each design option: - General Conditions (5.00% on direct costs) - Bonds & Insurance (1.50% compound) - Contractor's Fee (5.00% compound) - Design Contingency (15.00% compound) - Escalation to MOC, 07/16/19 (4.78% compound) Escalation All subcontract prices herein are reflective of current bid prices. Escalation has been included on the summary level to the stated mid point of construction. Design Contingency An allowance of 15% for undeveloped design details has been included in this estimate. As the design of each system is further developed, details which historically increase cost become apparent and must be incorporated into the estimate while decreasing the % burden. Construction Contingency An allowance of 5% construction contingency has been carried on the summary page. Construction Schedule Costs included herein have been based upon a construction period of 9 months. Any costs for excessive overtime to meet accelerated schedule milestone dates are not included in this estimate. Anticipated Start Date: March 2019 Anticipated Completion Date: December 2019 Anticipated Mid-Point of Construction: July 2019 Method of Procurement The estimate is based on a design-bid-build delivery model. Bid Conditions This estimate has been based upon competitive bid situations (minimum of 4 bidders) for all items of subcontracted work. Prepared by Page 2 of 12 189 Otay Ranch Village 3, Park 1 Chula Vista, California Project # #17-00696.00 Master Plan SOPC 05/10/18 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Basis For Quantities Wherever possible, this estimate has been based upon the actual measurement of different items of work. For the remaining items, parametric measurements were used in conjunction with other projects of a similar nature. Basis for Unit Costs Unit costs as contained herein are based on current bid prices in Chula Vista, California. Sub overheads and profit are included in each line item unit cost. Their overhead and profit covers each sub's cost for labor burden, materials, and equipment, sales taxes, field overhead, home office overhead, and profit. The general contractor's overhead is shown separately on the master summary. Sources for Pricing This estimate was prepared by a team of qualified cost consultants experienced in estimating construction costs at all stages of design. These consultants have used pricing data from Cumming's database for construction, updated to reflect current conditions in Chula Vista, California. Key Exclusions The following items have been excluded from our estimate: - Professional fees, inspections and testing. - Cost of hazardous materials surveys, abatement and disposal. - Furnishings, furniture and equipment (FF&E), unless noted in the estimate. - Escalation beyond midpoint of construction. - Phasing. - Off hours work. - Demolition. - Offsite work. - Detention basins. - Streetscape including hardscape, landscape, and irrigation (by others). - Landscape and irrigation on 4:1 sloped area (by master developer). Items Affecting Cost Estimate Items which may change the estimated construction cost include, but are not limited to: - Modifications to the scope of work included in this estimate. - Unforeseen sub-surface conditions. - Restrictive technical specifications or excessive contract conditions. - Any specified item of material or product that cannot be obtained from 3 sources. - Any other non-competitive bid situations. - Bids delayed beyond the projected schedule. Statement of Probable Cost Cumming has no control over the cost of labor and materials, the general contractor's or any subcontractor's method of determining prices, or competitive bidding and market conditions. This estimate is made on the basis of the experience, qualifications, and best judgement of a professional consultant familiar with the construction industry. Cumming, however, cannot and does not guarantee that proposals, bids, or actual construction costs will not vary from this or subsequent cost estimates. Prepared by Page 3 of 12 190 Otay Ranch Village 3, Park 1 Chula Vista, California Project # #17-00696.00 Master Plan SOPC 05/10/18 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Cumming's staff of professional cost consultants has prepared this estimate in accordance with generally accepted principles and practices. This staff is available to discuss its contents with any interested party. Pricing reflects probable construction costs obtainable in the project locality on the target dates specified and is a determination of fair market value for the construction of this project. The estimate is not a prediction of low bid. Pricing assumes competitive bidding for every portion of the construction work for all sub and general contractors with a range of 3 - 4 bidders for all items of work. Experience and research indicates that a fewer number of bidders may result in higher bids. Conversely, an increased number of bidders may result in more competitive bid day responses. Recommendations Cumming recommends that the Owner and the Architect carefully review this entire document to ensure it reflects their design intent. Requests for modifications of any apparent errors or omissions to this document must be made to Cumming within ten days of receipt of this estimate. Otherwise, it will be assumed that its contents have been reviewed and accepted. If the project is over budget or there are unresolved budget issues, alternate systems / schemes should be evaluated before proceeding into further design phases. It is recommended that there are preparations of further cost estimates throughout design by Cumming to determine overall cost changes since the preparation of this preliminary estimate. These future estimates will have detailed breakdowns indicating materials by type, kind, and size, priced by their respective units of measure. Prepared by Page 4 of 12 191 Otay Ranch Village 3, Park 1 Chula Vista, California Project # #17-00696.00 Master Plan SOPC 05/10/18 Escaya Park Prepared by Page 5 of 12 192 Otay Ranch Village 3, Park 1 Chula Vista, California Project # #17-00696.00 Master Plan SOPC 05/10/18 Element Total Cost / SF 01 Site Clearance / Demolition $29,183 $0.09 02 Earthwork $135,763 $0.43 03 Erosion Control $85,246 $0.27 04 Comfort Station $269,376 $0.84 05 Parking Lot $96,745 $0.30 06 Hardscape $409,063 $1.28 07 Landscape $810,829 $2.54 08 Fencing $52,290 $0.16 09 Site Structures $102,000 $0.32 10 Site Specialties / Furnishings $134,105 $0.42 11 Recreational Sport Fields and Play Area $349,981 $1.10 12 Site Utilities $810,740 $2.54 Subtotal $3,285,319 $10.29 General Conditions 5.00% $164,266 $0.51 Subtotal $3,449,585 $10.80 Bonds & Insurance 1.50% $51,744 $0.16 Subtotal $3,501,329 $10.97 Contractor's Fee 5.00% $175,066 $0.55 Subtotal $3,676,395 $11.51 Design Contingency 15.00% $551,459 $1.73 Subtotal $4,227,854 $13.24 Escalation to MOC, 07/16/19 4.78% $202,270 $0.63 TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST 319,300 SF $4,430,124 $13.87 Owner Allowances and Costs Construction Contingency 5.00% $221,506 Plan Check, Permit and Inspection Fees 4.50% $199,356 Otay Water District Fees (Effective 4/1/2018) Potable Water Meter - 1-1/2", and Capacity Fees 1 ea $58,457 Recycled Water Meters - 2" 2 ea $68,231 Temporary Meter 1 ea $2,000 Plan Check 1 ea $3,000 City of Chula Vista Sewer Capacity Fees, allowance 1 ls $5,000 Field Staking and Layout 1 ls $86,200 SDG&E Costs and Fees, allowance 1 ls $5,000 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST INCLUDING OWNERS COST 319,300 SF $5,078,874 $15.91 SUMMARY - ESCAYA PARK Prepared by Page 6 of 12 193 Otay Ranch Village 3, Park 1 Chula Vista, California Project # #17-00696.00 Master Plan SOPC 05/10/18 Element Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total DETAIL ELEMENTS - ESCAYA PARK Site Clearance / Demolition Demolition, no work anticipated Excluded Site Preparation Construction fence 2,845 lf $8.50 $24,183 Construction entrance, allowance 1 ea $5,000.00 $5,000 Total - Site Clearance / Demolition $29,183 Earthwork Earthwork Field staking / layout (by owner) Excluded Rough grading, allowance 1,000 cy $5.95 $5,950 Overexcavate and recompact, 1'-0" below / beyond courts 310 cy $6.75 $2,093 Fine grading 319,300 sf $0.40 $127,720 Total - Earthwork $135,763 Erosion Control Erosion Control, allowance 319,300 sf $0.22 $70,246 SWPPP, allowance 1 ls $15,000.00 $15,000 Total - Erosion Control $85,246 Comfort Station Foundations incl. overexcavate and recompact 3'-0" beyond / below, allowance 576 bsf $17.50 $10,080 Slab On Grade, allowance 576 bsf $11.00 $6,336 Exterior (Walls, finishes, doors, etc.), allowance 864 sf $62.00 $53,568 Roof, allowance 952 sf $60.00 $57,120 Interior (Finishes, specialties, etc.), allowance 576 bsf $77.00 $44,352 Plumbing, allowance 576 bsf $120.00 $69,120 HVAC, assumed no work needed Excluded Prepared by Page 7 of 12 194 Otay Ranch Village 3, Park 1 Chula Vista, California Project # #17-00696.00 Master Plan SOPC 05/10/18 Element Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total DETAIL ELEMENTS - ESCAYA PARK Electrical, allowance 576 bsf $50.00 $28,800 Total - Comfort Station 337 $ / sf $269,376 Parking Lot Paving AC paving, parking lot 5,560 sf $5.00 $27,800 Parking Lot Striping / Striping Parking stall, standard 7 ea $50.00 $350 Parking stall, ADA 2 ea $350.00 $700 Miscellaneous parking specialties, allowance 1 ls $1,130.00 $1,130 Concrete Curbs / Ramps Concrete curb 406 lf $18.50 $7,511 Trash Enclosure Concrete slab 190 sf $10.00 $1,900 Concrete curb 53 lf $18.50 $981 Mansory wall footings 55 lf $45.00 $2,475 Mansory wall 440 sf $38.00 $16,720 Metal security screen 234 sf $47.00 $10,998 Standing seam roof including framing 348 sf $60.00 $20,880 Gate, double, vehicle 1 pr $3,500.00 $3,500 Gate, single, pedestrian 1 ea $1,800.00 $1,800 Total - Parking Lot $96,745 Hardscape Hardscape 4" Concrete paving, natural color, pedestrian 27,796 sf $7.00 $194,572 6" Concrete paving, natural color, light vehicle 18,364 sf $8.75 $160,685 Concrete Pad Bench pads, 4'-0" x 8'-0" 256 sf $7.25 $1,856 Table pads, 10'-0" x 15'-0" 2,700 sf $7.25 $19,575 Projection screen pad, 30'-0" x 5'-0" 150 sf $7.25 $1,088 Concrete Curbs / Ramps Mow curb 1,750 lf $10.25 $17,938 Prepared by Page 8 of 12 195 Otay Ranch Village 3, Park 1 Chula Vista, California Project # #17-00696.00 Master Plan SOPC 05/10/18 Element Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total DETAIL ELEMENTS - ESCAYA PARK Curb cut concrete ramps 10 ea $1,200.00 $12,000 ADA truncated domes 60 sf $22.50 $1,350 Total - Hardscape $409,063 Landscape Planting Soil preparation and amendments, 9" deep, allowance 250,128 sf $0.26 $65,033 Decomposed granite paving (3") incl. fabric 2,305 sf $2.50 $5,763 Detention basin, existing, no work anticipated Excluded Sodded turf 229,833 sf $0.71 $163,181 Shrubbery, allowance 20,295 sf $3.70 $75,092 Trees, 24" box 115 ea $650.00 $74,750 Mulch, allowance 20,295 sf $0.30 $6,089 Landscape maintenance 12 mo $3,500.00 $42,000 Irrigation Planting area 20,295 sf $2.25 $45,664 Lawn area 229,833 sf $1.45 $333,258 Total - Landscape $810,829 Fencing Fencing Peeler log, 3 rail 1,162 lf $45.00 $52,290 Total - Fencing $52,290 Site Structures Site Structures Pre-fabricated shade shelter, 24'-0" x 34'-0", allowance 1 ea $102,000.00 $102,000 Total - Site Structures $102,000 Site Specialties / Furnishings Signage Monument signage, 4'-0" x 1'-6" x 20'-0", allowance 1 ea $12,500.00 $12,500 Prepared by Page 9 of 12 196 Otay Ranch Village 3, Park 1 Chula Vista, California Project # #17-00696.00 Master Plan SOPC 05/10/18 Element Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total DETAIL ELEMENTS - ESCAYA PARK Monument signage, 4'-0" x 1'-6" x 35'-0", allowance 1 ea $16,200.00 $16,200 Site signage, allowance 1 ls $20,000.00 $20,000 Site Furnishings Bench, 6'-6" 8 ea $2,590.00 $20,720 Picnic table 10 ea $1,390.00 $13,900 Picnic table, ADA 8 ea $1,390.00 $11,120 Trash / recycle receptacle 12 ea $1,180.00 $14,160 Hot ash receptacle 3 ea $915.00 $2,745 BBQ grill 6 ea $590.00 $3,540 Bicycle rack, quote provided by dero 1 ea $839.99 $840 Drinking fountains, ADA, with sump drain 3 ea $4,460.00 $13,380 Projection screen, by others Excluded Bounce house, no work anticipated Excluded Miscellaneous site furnishing, allowance 1 ls $5,000.00 $5,000 Total - Site Specialties / Furnishings $134,105 Recreational Sport Fields and Play Area Basketball Court Concrete paving 7,980 sf $7.00 $55,860 Epoxy bonded surfacing 7,980 sf $1.25 $9,975 Basket ball striping, allowance 1 ls $750.00 $750 Pickle ball striping, allowance 1 ls $500.00 $500 Basketball post, backboard and hoops 2 ea $6,500.00 $13,000 Play Area Play surfacing PIP rubber surface, quote provided by Dave Bang Associates 6,516 sf $13.60 $88,586 4" aggregate base 6,516 sf $0.28 $1,810 Play structures Play structure, 5-12, quote provided by Dave Bang Associates 1 ls $83,700.00 $83,700 Play structure, 2-5, quote provided by Dave Bang Associates 1 ls $35,500.00 $35,500 Swing structure, quote provided by Dave Bang Associates 1 ls $7,500.00 $7,500 Nuclea, quote provided by Dave Bang Associates 1 ls $1,500.00 $1,500 1 ls $51,300.00 $51,300 Soccer Fields Goals and nets, by others Excluded Total - Recreational Sport Fields and Play Area $349,981 Installation for the play structures, budget provided by Dave Bang Prepared by Page 10 of 12 197 Otay Ranch Village 3, Park 1 Chula Vista, California Project # #17-00696.00 Master Plan SOPC 05/10/18 Element Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total DETAIL ELEMENTS - ESCAYA PARK Prepared by Page 11 of 12 198 Otay Ranch Village 3, Park 1 Chula Vista, California Project # #17-00696.00 Master Plan SOPC 05/10/18 Element Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total DETAIL ELEMENTS - ESCAYA PARK Site Utilities (Excluding meter and capacity charges, plan check and inspection fees) Domestic Water, allowance 850 lf $75.00 $63,750 Sanitary Sewer, allowance 450 lf $75.00 $33,750 Storm Drainage, allowance 319,300 sf $0.80 $255,440 Pedestrian Lighting, allowance 319,300 sf $0.80 $255,440 Soccer Field Lighting Musco lights 4 ea $45,000.00 $180,000 Musco controls 1 ls $10,500.00 $10,500 Concrete pull box (CALTRANS No. 5) 6 ea $450.00 $2,700 Musco lighting branch 800 lf $11.45 $9,160 Total - Site Utilities $810,740 Prepared by Page 12 of 12 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 RESOLUTION NO. __________ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE PARK MASTER PLAN AND THE NAME FOR THE 7.5-ACRE NEIGHBORHOOD PARK P-1 LOCATED IN OTAY RANCH VILLAGE 3 WHEREAS, the Sectional Planning Area (SPA) plan for the Village 3 North and a Portion of Village 4 development was adopted by City Council on December 13, 2016 (Resolution No. 16-0591 and Ordinance No. 3396); and WHEREAS, the SPA plan includes a Village 3 North Neighborhood Park (P-1) Concept Plan for the park, describing how the park obligations, in accordance with Chapter 17.10 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code (Municipal Code), will be met, and the general character of the proposed improvements; and WHEREAS, the park site was offered for dedication to the City of Chula Vista on Final Subdivision Map No. 16160 recorded at the County Recorder’s Office on November 30, 2016; and WHEREAS, the Village 3 North project meets its park obligations, as stated in Chapter 17.10 of the Municipal Code, through a combination of parkland dedication, parkland development improvements, and in lieu fees; and WHEREAS, park provisions to be made are stated in the Agreement Regarding Construction of Neighborhood Park P-1 in Otay Ranch Village 3 and a portion of Community Park P-2 in Otay Ranch Village 4 approved by City Council on December 06, 2016 (Resolution No. 2016-257); and WHEREAS, the public park in Village 3 North is to be provided through the “turnkey” method where the developer designs and constructs the park on behalf of the City in lieu of paying park development fees; and WHEREAS, the master developer, HomeFed Village III Master, LLC and their landscape architecture consultants, DeLorenzo International, have entered into a two-party agreement for the design of the park; and WHEREAS, the Director of Development Services has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the project was adequately covered in the previously adopted Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR-13-01) for the Village 3 North and a Portion of Village 4 Sectional Planning Area (SPA) plan. Thus, no further environmental review or documentation is required; and WHEREAS, the Parks and Recreation Commission recommended approval of the Park Master Plan and the park name at its meeting on June 21, 2018. 220 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, that it hereby approves the Park Master Plan and the name “Escaya Park” for the 7.5-acre Neighborhood Park P-1 located in Otay Ranch Village 3. Presented by:Approved as to form by: Kelly G. Broughton, FASLA Glen R. Googins Director of Development Services City Attorney 221 RESOLUTION NO. __________ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING A FIRST AMENDMENT TO AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND HOMEFED VILLAGE III MASTER, LLC FOR CONSTRUCTION OF NEIGHBORHOOD PARK P-1 IN OTAY RANCH VILLAGE 3 AND A PORTION OF COMMUNITY PARK P-2 IN OTAY RANCH VILLAGE 4 AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS THEREFOR (4/5 VOTE REQUIRED) WHEREAS, City and HomeFed previously entered into that certain agreement, namely, Agreement Regarding Construction of Neighborhood Park P-1 in Otay Ranch Village 3 and a portion of Community Park P-2 in Otay Ranch Village 4 (Original Agreement) on December 6, 2016; and WHEREAS, City and HomeFed desire to amend the Original Agreement (First Amendment) to allow for the contribution of additional funds to supplement the Neighborhood Park P-1 budget; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Original Agreement, the Neighborhood Park Budget for Neighborhood Park P-1 is based upon the proportional ratio of neighborhood parkland acres required for Village 3, assuming the Development portion of the City’s current Parkland Acquisition and Development Fee as the budget per acre; and WHEREAS, the City and HomeFed agree that construction costs have recently increased significantly, including, but not limited to labor and materials; and WHEREAS, applying the Development portion of the City’s current Parkland Acquisition and Development Fee results in a budget shortfall for Neighborhood Park P-1 of one million dollars ($1,000,000.00), assuming a prototypical park design; and WHEREAS, the City and HomeFed agree to each contribute matching fund amounts, up to but not to exceed five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000.00) each for a combined total not to exceed one million dollars ($1,000,000.00), in addition to the Development Fees pursuant to the Original Agreement to cover only those costs needed to construct the park amenities included in Exhibit F of the First Amendment; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution 2006-191, the City has collected funds from the Eastlake III Senior Project (Olympic Pointe) which may be utilized on any park or public facility serving the Eastern Territories of Chula Vista (the “Olympic Pointe Park Funds”); and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to contribute five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000.00) of the Olympic Pointe Park Funds toward the Neighborhood Park P-1 budget; and 222 WHEREAS, the City and HomeFed agree that HomeFed’s additional contribution of $500,000.00 is in excess of their fee obligation pursuant to the City’s Parkland Acquisition and Fee Program and is not eligible for credit against said fee program; and WHEREAS, the City and HomeFed agree to utilize the combined additional park funding of up to one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) for the purposes of increasing the Neighborhood Park P-1 budget established by the Development Fees pursuant to the Original Agreement and the First Amendment; and WHEREAS, HomeFed agrees to provide, in “Turnkey” condition (as the term “Turnkey is defined in the Original Agreement), the selected Neighborhood Park P-1 amenities noted on Exhibit F of the First Amendment; and WHEREAS, the City and HomeFed agree to amend Exhibit F if the increase to the Neighborhood Park P-1 budget cannot satisfy in full the estimated construction costs for all amenities noted on Exhibit F. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, that it hereby approves the First Amendment to Agreement between the City of Chula Vista and HomeFed Village III Master, LLC for construction of Neighborhood Park P-1 in Otay Ranch Village 3 and a Portion of Community Park P-2 in Otay Ranch Village 4. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, that it hereby approves the appropriation of $500,000.00 from the Parkland Acquisition and Development (PAD) fund for the purposes of funding the City’s contribution toward the P-1 Neighborhood Park Budget increase. Presented by:Approved as to form by: Kelly G. Broughton, FASLA Glen R. Googins Director of Development Services City Attorney 223 RESOLUTION NO. __________ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING A REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND HOMEFED VILLAGE III MASTER, LLC FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF NEIGHBORHOOD PARK P-1 IN OTAY RANCH VILLAGE 3 WHEREAS, City Council approved Resolution 2016-257 approving the Agreement Regarding Construction of Neighborhood Park P-1 in Otay Ranch Village 3 and a portion of Community Park P-2 in Otay Ranch Village 4, dated December 6, 2016 (the “Parks Agreement”); and WHEREAS, the provisions of turnkey Neighborhood Park P-1 (Project) are identified in Section 3 of the Parks Agreement; and WHEREAS, subject to the execution and approval by City Council of a separate amendment to the Parks Agreement (First Amendment), the City and HomeFed agree to each contribute matching fund amounts, up to but not to exceed five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000.00) each for a combined total not to exceed one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) to cover only those costs needed to construct the park amenities included in Exhibit F of the First Amendment, in addition to the Neighborhood Park Budget pursuant to the Parks Agreement; and WHEREAS, subject to the execution and approval by City Council of said First Amendment, the City and HomeFed agree that HomeFed’s additional contribution of $500,000.00 is in excess of their fee obligation pursuant to the City’s Parkland Acquisition and Fee Program and is not eligible for credit against said fee program; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution 2006-191, the City has collected funds from the Eastlake III Senior Project (Olympic Pointe) which may be utilized on any park or public facility serving the Eastern Territories of Chula Vista (the “Olympic Pointe Park Funds”); and WHEREAS, the Project is eligible for funds from the Olympic Pointe Park Funds; and WHEREAS, subject to the execution and approval by City Council of said First Amendment, the City Council desires to apply a portion of the funds collected from the Olympic Pointe Park Funds to satisfy the City’s contribution of five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000.00) toward the Neighborhood Park P-1 budget; and WHEREAS, currently, the City has sufficient Olympic Pointe Park funds available to reimburse HomeFed for the City’s contribution toward the Neighborhood Park P-1 budget; and 224 WHEREAS, HomeFed desires to enter into this Reimbursement Agreement with the City, so that it may obtain reimbursement for the City’s contribution toward the Neighborhood Park P-1 budget. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, that it hereby approves the Reimbursement Agreement between the City of Chula Vista and HomeFed Village III Master, LLC, for the Construction of Neighborhood Park P-1 in Otay Ranch Village 3. Presented by:Approved as to form by: Kelly G. Broughton, FASLA Glen R. Googins Director of Development Services City Attorney 225 226 227 228 P a g e | 1 August 14, 2018 File ID: 18-0289 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA APPROVING A GOLF COURSE FACILITY MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT WITH TOUCHSTONE GOLF, LLC FOR PROFESSIONAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR THE CHULA VISTA GOLF COURSE RECOMMENDED ACTION Council adopt the resolution. SUMMARY On November 1, 2016 the City approved an agreement with Touchstone Golf, LLC to manage the Chula Vista Municipal Golf Course. The original agreement was for a one-year period with a provision to extend for an additional year which was exercised by staff. Staff recommends entering into a new agreement with Touchstone for an additional term of five years. Touchstone’s management of the facility has resulted in physical improvements to the facility, an increase in the quality of the golf experience and a slightly improved financial position for the City’s asset. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Environmental Notice The activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required. Environmental Determination The Director of Development Services has reviewed the proposed activity for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines because it will not result in a physical change in the environment; therefore, pursuant to Section 15060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Thus, no environmental review is required. BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Not Applicable DISCUSSION In 1984, the City entered into a lease agreement with American Golf Corporation that afforded the 229 P a g e | 2 City a long-term management solution with a steady stream of revenue. It also required very little input or resources from the City. Conversely, it provided the operator with very little incentive to maintain the facility at a high level and no incentive to perform upgrades. As a result, the facility fell behind current standards and had some serious issues and as a result of deferred maintenance to the facility. After staff review of the facility and the terms of the lease staff recommended in November 2016 to transition the facility from a lease agreement to a management agreement with Touchstone Golf. The management agreement allows the City to have more control on the level of investment and management over the operations which allows flexibility to adapt to changing market conditions. The management model has provided the City direct control over the operation and management of the Golf Course. Touchstone Golf, LLC one-year trial period was extended an additional year based on their successful management of the facility. Touchstone’s management of the facility has resulted in physical improvements to the facility, an increase in the quality of the golf experience for our customers and an improved financial position for the City’s asset. Touchstone has been very responsive to the City’s direction and have shown creativity in addressing the various issues that have arisen. Their current agreement expires on October 31, 2018 and staff recommends continuing the relationship with Touchstone Golf as the operator of the course. The proposed agreement is for one five year term. This will give added stability to the operation of the golf course and provide staff with historical operational data for this business model. This will be used to evaluate future operations of the course going forward. This agreement also provides an increase in the monthly fee by $500 dollars beginning on November 1, 2018. In conclusion, Touchstone Golf has continued to make improvements to the facility by working with City staff to fund improvements that improve the golfing experience while also improving the experience for community members who just want to use the facility as a meeting/gathering location. Improvements have been made to the 19th hole and to the menu which have resulted in an increase of visitors to the facility and a moderate increase to the revenues received from food and beverage. DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT Staff has reviewed the property holdings of the City Council members and has found no property holdings within 500 feet of the boundaries of the property which is the subject of this action. Consequently, this item does not present a disqualifying real property-related financial conflict of interest under California Code of Regulations Title 2, section 18702.2(a)(11), for purposes of the Political Reform Act (Cal. Gov’t Code §87100,et seq.). Staff is not independently aware, and has not been informed by any City Council member, of any other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter. LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS 230 P a g e | 3 The City’s Strategic Plan has five major goals: Operational Excellence, Economic Vitality, Healthy Community, Strong and Secure Neighborhoods and a Connected Community. By providing a quality municipal golf course and banquet facility that is affordable the City is promoting healthy community. CURRENT YEAR FISCAL IMPACT Both the cost of the management agreement and the lease for the golf carts are covered within the approved Golf Course’s operating budget for FY 2018-2019 budget. There will be no additional fiscal impact in the current fiscal year. ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT There will be no un-budgeted fiscal impact beyond the current fiscal year. ATTACHMENTS Management Agreement Staff Contact: Rick Ryals, Real Property Manager 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 RESOLUTION NO. __________ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA APPROVING A GOLF COURSE FACILITY MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT WITH TOUCHSTONE GOLF, LLC FOR PROFESSIONAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR THE CHULA VISTA GOLF COURSE WHEREAS, Chula Vista Municipal Code section 2.56.110 authorizes the City of Chula Vista to enter into contracts for professional services; and WHEREAS, on November 1, 2016, the City Council approved a professional services agreement with Touchstone Golf, LLC to manage the Chula Vista Municipal Golf Course; and WHEREAS, that agreement was for a one-year term including a provision for a one-year extension; and WHEREAS, the agreement was extended and will expire on October 31, 2018; and WHEREAS, based on Touchstone’s satisfactory performance to date, City staff and Touchstone Golf, LLC negotiated terms for a subsequent Golf Course Facility Management Agreement with the following proposed material terms: (i) five-year term from November 1, 2018 through October 31, 2023; (ii) City option to terminate the agreement for convenience upon one hundred and eighty (180) days’ notice, (iii) City payment of $7,500 monthly Base Management Fee; and (iv) City payment of an Incentive Management Fee where Touchstone Golf, LLC achieves year-to-year revenue increases; and WHEREAS, City staff recommends that the City Council approve entering into the agreement with the above material terms; and WHEREAS, City staff finds that the City’s interests would be materially better served by applying the above-referenced alternate purchasing procedure given Touchstone Golf LLC’s extensive background, experience, and understanding of the operations of the Chula Vista Municipal Golf Course; and WHEREAS, City staff finds that the alternative procurement procedure utilized is consistent with best purchasing practices for golf course facility management agreements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, that it approves the Golf Course Facility Management Agreement between the City of Chula Vista and Touchstone Golf, LLC, in the form presented, with such minor modifications as may be required or approved by the City Attorney, a copy of which shall be kept on file in the Office of the City Clerk, and authorizes and directs the Mayor to execute same. 251 Presented by Approved as to form by Eric Crockett Glen R. Googins Director, Economic Development City Attorney 252 P a g e | 1 August 14, 2018 File ID: 18-0294 TITLE RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA TRANSFERRING $550,000 IN TRANSNET APPROPRIATIONS FROM STM0397 (MAJOR PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FY2018/19) TO STM0392 (CLASS TWO BIKE LANES ON BROADWAY)PROJECT (4/5 VOTE REQUIRED) RECOMMENDED ACTION Council adopt the resolution. SUMMARY Bike Lanes on Broadway consists of two projects, Bike Lane Improvements on Broadway - Phase 1, (STM0384) and, Class Two Bike Lanes on Broadway, (STM0392). The projects will install bike lanes along Broadway from Main Street to C Street. The project limits for STM0384 are, from G Street to C Street, and for STM0392 from Main Street to G Street. The two projects will be advertised and constructed as one combined project. Design changes, including bicycle video detection and additional slurry seal on Broadway, have increased the expected construction costs. An additional $550,000 is required to award the contract and complete the entire project. It is recommended that TransNet funds be transferred from STM0397 to STM0392. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Director of Development Services has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the project qualifies for a Categorical Exemption pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 Class 1 (Existing Facilities) and/or Section 15304 Class 4 (Minor Alterations to Land) because the proposed project would not result in a significant effect on the environment, create a cumulative impact, damage a scenic highway, or cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. Thus, no further environmental review is required. BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION Not applicable. 253 P a g e | 2 DISCUSSION On February 16, 2016, City Council approved Resolution 2016-023 adopting the Bike Lanes on Broadway Feasibility Study (STM0384) and authorizing the implementation of the study. The Study proposes bike lanes along Broadway from Main Street to C Street, buffered lanes wherever possible. This will be accomplished by reducing parking between Main Street and L Street, narrowing the lanes between L Street and G Street, and by eliminating a traffic lane in each direction between G Street and C Street. Initially, the project was proposed intwo phases to accommodate funding and construction, Phase 1 north of G Street (STM0384) and Phase 2 south of G Street (STM0392). Certain Active Transportation Program (ATP) Funding became available for design and construction of the project from Main Street to G Street. The City was able to obtain ATP Augmentation funds for Preliminary Engineering and additional ATP funds for construction. STM0384 is funded entirely by TransNet while STM0392 is funded by a combination of TransNet and ATP Funds. During the engineering design phase it was determined that a slurry seal should be applied to the entire length of Broadway and that a video detection system would be required at most intersections along the corridor, thereby increasing the project costs. It is recommended to transfer TransNet Funds from STM0397 to STM0392 for the purpose of completing additional improvements. DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT Staff has reviewed the property holdings of the City Council members and has found no property holdings within 500 feet of the boundaries of the property which is the subject of this action. Consequently, this item does not present a disqualifying real property-related financial conflict of interest under California Code of Regulations Title 2, section 18702.2(a)(11), for purposes of the Political Reform Act (Cal. Gov’t Code §87100,et seq.). Staff is not independently aware, and has not been informed by any City Council member, of any other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter. LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS The City’s Strategic Plan has five major goals: Operational Excellence, Economic Vitality, Healthy Community, Strong and Secure Neighborhoods and a Connected Community. The Bike Lanes on Broadway project supports both the Healthy Community and the Connected Community goals as it seeks to improve the City’s Bicycle network, connecting several bike routes and encourages bike riding in the western portion of the City. 254 P a g e | 3 CURRENT-YEAR FISCAL IMPACT Approval of this resolution will transfer $550,000 in TransNet from STM0397 to STM0392 and initiate the construction phase of STM0384 and STM0392. Sufficient funds are available for said transfer and to award the contract. Therefore, there is no additional impact to the TransNet Fund. ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT Upon completion of the project, the improvements will require only routine City street maintenance. ATTACHMENTS None. Staff Contact: Mario Ingrasci (Ext 5476) 255 RESOLUTION NO. 2018-______ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA TRANSFERRING $550,000 IN TRANSNET APPROPRIATIONS FROM STM0397 (MAJOR PAVEMENT REHABILITATION (FY2018/19) TO STM0392 (CLASS TWO BIKE LANES ON BROADWAY) PROJECT WHEREAS, Bike Lanes on Broadway consists of two projects, Bike Lane Improvements on Broadway - Phase 1, (STM0384) and, Class Two Bike Lanes on Broadway, (STM0392); and WHEREAS, the projects will install bike lanes along Broadway from Main Street to C Street; and WHEREAS, design changes, including bicycle video detection and additional slurry seal on Broadway, have increased the expected construction costs and an additional $550,000 is required to award the contract and complete the entire project; and WHEREAS, Transnet funding has been approved for the existing “Major Pavement Rehabilitation FY2018/19 (CIP# STL0397)” project; and WHEREAS, staff is recommending a transfer of Transnet Funds from the existing “Major Pavement Rehabilitation FY2018/19 (CIP# STL0397)” project to the “Class Two Bike Lanes on Broadway (CIP# STM392)” project in the amount of $550,000 for purposes of completing the required improvements; and WHEREAS, STL397 has a sufficient balance available to fund the inter-project transfer. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of Chula Vista hereby authorizes a transfer of $550,000 in TransNet appropriations from STM0397 to STM0392. Presented by _________________________ William S. Valle Director of Engineering & Capital Projects/City Engineer Approved as to form by Glen R. Googins City Attorney 256 P a g e | 1 August 14, 2018 File ID: 18-0318 TITLE RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING BIDS, AWARDING THE CONTRACT FOR THE COMBINED ADVERTISEMENT OF THE “MAJOR PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FY 2017/2018 (STM393)” AND “BONITA ROAD AND ALLEN SCHOOL LANE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS (STL418)” PROJECTS TO FRANK AND SON PAVING, INC., IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,346,443.66, APPROPRIATING $86,647 FROM THE AVAILABLE BALANCE OF THE SEWER FACILITY REPLACEMENT FUND TO STM393, AND TRANSFERRING $14,638 IN CALRECYCLE GRANT FUND APPROPRIATIONS FROM STM390 TO STM393 (4/5 VOTE REQUIRED) RECOMMENDED ACTION Council adopt the resolutions. SUMMARY On July 11, 2018, the Director of Engineering and Capital Projects received six (6) sealed bids for the combined advertisement of the “Major Pavement Rehabilitation FY 2017/2018 (STM393)” and “Bonita Road and Allen School Lane Intersection Improvements (STL418)” projects. The projects are included in the Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Years 2017/2018 (STM393) and 2016/2017 (STL418) and are both funded by TransNet. Staff recommends that Council award the bid to Frank and Son Paving Inc. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Director of Development Services has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the project qualifies for a Class 1 Categorical Exemption pursuant to Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) of the State CEQA Guidelines because the proposal involves negligible or no expansion of an existing use. Thus, no further environmental review is required. BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION Not Applicable. DISCUSSION The “Major Pavement Rehabilitation FY 2017/2018 (STM393)” and “Bonita Road and Allen School Lane Intersection Improvement (STL418)” projects will primarily consist of the following improvements: 257 P a g e | 2 Roadway rehabilitation at various locations in the City of Chula Vista using asphalt concrete pavement overlays and Asphalt Rubber Aggregate Membrane (ARAM) chip seals, Modification of pedestrian crosswalk and pedestrian ramps at the intersection of Bonita Road and Allen School Lane, Installation of temporary asphalt concrete sidewalks on Bay Boulevardand Industrial Boulevard, Street sweeping at various locations in the City of Chula Vista, and Adjustment of sewer and storm drain manhole covers on East H Street. Bidding Process On June 8, 2018, Engineering and Capital Projects Staff advertised the project and received six (6) sealed bids on July 11, 2018. The original base bid totals from the prime contractors were as follows: Ranking Contractor Original Base Bid Amount 1 Frank and Son Paving Inc $2,346,443.61 2 LC Paving and Sealing Inc $2,445,356.11 3 Eagle Paving Company Inc $2,570,000.00 4 TC Construction $2,768,910.40 5 SRM Contracting and Paving $2,966,720.45 6 ATP General Engineering Contractors LLC $3,093,995.00 During Staff review of the bid proposals received, a minor computational error was discovered that resulted in an administrative adjustment to the original base bid amount for Frank and Son Paving Inc. It shall be noted that the resulting administrative adjustment to the base bid amount did not change the lowest responsive bidder for the project. The original and adjusted base bid amounts are as follows: Frank and Son Paving Inc Base Bid Amount Original $2,346,443.61 Adjusted $2,346,443.66 The lowest responsive bidder for the project, Frank and Son Paving Inc., has acknowledged the minor computational error in their bid proposal and indicated that they will honor the adjusted base bid amount (Attachment 1). The adjusted base bid amount of $2,346,443.66 is below the Engineer’s Estimate of $2,624,810 by $278,366.34 (or approximately 11%). Based on minor variations between the base bid amounts received, City Staff has determined that the bid proposals received represent the current construction costs for the improvements associated with the project and will update unit costs appropriately for future estimates. Frank and Son Paving Inc.’s Contractor License No. 612545, as well as all listed sub-contractor’s licenses, are current and active as of July 2018. Staff has verified the references provided by the Contractor and determined them to be satisfactory. Staff recommends awarding the contract in the amount of $2,346,443.66 to Frank and Son Paving Inc. 258 P a g e | 3 Change Orders On May 9, 2017, City Council approved Resolution 17-0174 to adopt ordinance (Ord. 3400 § 1, 2017) of the City of Chula Vista and amend Chapter 2.56 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code – “Purchasing System”. This ordinance amends the change order limits and authorizes the City Engineer to approve change orders up to the remaining CIP budget available for the CIP project. Disclosure Statement Attachment 2 is a copy of the Contractor’s Disclosure Statement Wage Statement The Contractor that is awarded the contract and its subcontractors are required to pay prevailing wages to persons employed by them for work under this contract. The prevailing wage scales are those determined by the Director of Industrial Relations, State of California. DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT STM393 Staff has reviewed the decision contemplated by this action and has determined that the decision concerns repairs, replacement or maintenance of existing streets, water, sewer, storm drainage or similar facilities, per California Code of Regulations Title 2, section 18702.2(c)(1), and consequently the 500-foot rule found in California Code of Regulations Title 2, section 18702.2(a)(11) is not applicable to this decision for purposes of determining a disqualifying real property-related financial conflict of interest under the Political Reform Act (Cal. Gov't Code § 87100, et seq.). Staff is not independently aware, and has not been informed by any City Council member, of any other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter. STL418 Staff has reviewed the property holdings of the City Council and has found no property holdings within 500 feet of the boundaries of the property which is the subject of this action. Staff is not independently aware, and has not been informed by any City Council member, of any other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter. Staff is not independently aware, and has not been informed by any City Council member, of any other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter. LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS The City’s Strategic Plan has five major goals: Operational Excellence, Economic Vitality, Healthy Community, Strong and Secure Neighborhoods and a Connected Community. The “Major Pavement Rehabilitation FY 2017/2018 (STM393) and Bonita Road and Allen School Lane Intersection Improvement (STL418)” project supports the Strong and Secure Neighborhoods Strategic Goal as the rehabilitation of existing pavements is necessary to extend the roadway life in a cost-effective manner, maintain safe roadway travel conditions and avoid further deterioration of pavement and base material. 259 P a g e | 4 CURRENT-YEAR FISCAL IMPACT Approval of the resolution will initiate the construction phase of STM393 and STL418. In addition, $86,647 will be appropriated from the Sewer Facility Replacement Fund to STM393 and $14,638 in CalRecycle Grant Funds will be transferred from STM390 to STM393. Sufficient funding is available to award the contract and for said appropriations. Therefore, there is no additional impact to the TransNet, Sewer Facility Replacement, and CalRecycle Grant Funds. The following table summarizes the project construction costs. FUNDS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION A. Contract Amount $2,346,443.66 B. Contract Contingency $676,888.34 C. Construction Inspection Staff Time $262,480.00 D. Design & Survey Staff Timeand Other Costs $80,000.00 TOTAL FUNDS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION $3,365,812.00 AVAILABLE FUNDING A. Project Budget (STM393)$3,121,818.00 B. Project Budget (STL418)$142,709.00 C. Appropriated Funds (Sewer Facility Replacement Fund)$86,647.00 D. Transferred Funds (CalRecycle Grant Fund)$14,638.00 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION $3,365,812.00 ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT Upon completion of the project, the improvements will require routine maintenance. ATTACHMENTS Attachment 1 – Acknowledgement of Clerical Errors Attachment 2 – Contractor’s Disclosure Statement Staff Contact: Tim Jones, Associate Engineer 260 RESOLUTION NO. 2018-_____ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING BIDS; AWARDING THE CONTRACT FOR THE COMBINED ADVERTISEMENT OF THE “MAJOR PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FY 2017/2018 (STM393)” AND “BONITA ROAD AND ALLEN SCHOOL LANE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT (STL418)” PROJECTS TO FRANK AND SON PAVING INC., IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,346.443.66; APPROPRIATING $86,647 FROM THE AVAILABLE BALANCE OF THE SEWER FACILITY REPLACEMENT FUND TO STM393; AND TRANSFERRING $14,638 IN CALRECYCLE GRANT FUND APPROPRIATIONS FROM STM390 TO STM393 (4/5 VOTE REQUIRED) WHEREAS, Chapter 2.56 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code authorizes the City to contract for public works; and WHEREAS, on June 8, 2018, the Department of Engineering and Capital Projects solicited bids for the combined advertisement of the “Major Pavement Rehabilitation FY 2017/2018 (STM393)” and “Bonita Road and Allen School Lane Intersection Improvement (STL418)” projects in accordance with Chula Vista Municipal Code section 2.56.160.A; and WHEREAS, on July 11, 2018, the Director of Engineering and Capital Projects received six (6) sealed bids for the combined advertisement of the “Major Pavement Rehabilitation FY 2017/2018 (STM393)” and “Bonita Road and Allen School Lane Intersection Improvement (STL418)” projects; and WHEREAS, the apparent low bid for the project was submitted by Frank and Son Paving Inc. in the amount of $2,346.443.66 (after administrative adjustment), which is below the Engineer’s estimate of $2,624,810 by $278,366.34 (approximately 11% below the Engineer’s estimate); and WHEREAS, staff has determined that the bid submitted by Frank and Son Paving Inc. is responsive in all material respects to the bid specifications/requirements, and that Frank and Son Paving Inc. is the lowest responsive and responsible bidder; and WHEREAS, staff recommends awarding the contract to Frank and Son Paving Inc. in the amount of $2,346,443.66. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista awards the contract for the “Major Pavement Rehabilitation FY 2017/2018 (STM393)” and “Bonita Road and Allen School Lane Intersection Improvement (STL418)” projects to Frank and Son Paving Inc. in the amount of $2,346,443.66. 261 Resolution No. ______ Page 2 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista appropriates $86,647 from the available balance of the Sewer Facility Replacement Fund to STM393 and transfers $14,638 in CalRecycle Grant Fund appropriations from STM390 to STM393. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista authorizes the Mayor, or designee, to execute the project contract on behalf of the City of Chula Vista, and directs a copy to be kept on file with the City Clerk. Presented by Approved as to form by ______________________________________________________ William S. Valle Glen R. Googins Director of Engineering and Capital Projects City Attorney 262 Son July 16, 2018 City of Chula Vista Department of Engineering and Capital projects Attn: Tim Jones 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 Subject: Mr. Jorres, Frank and Son Paving Inc' ("Frank and Sons") is providing this letter as response to the request for clarificationsreceived from the city o,f chula vista ("city") for the Mujo, Pavement Rehabilitation Fy20 l1/201g (STM3g3) andBonita Road and Allen Sclrool Lane Intersection Improvements (STL4l g) project. The city has requested confirmation of the Base Bid Grand Total for the bid itern list (attached) received July I l,20r8. Frank and Sons confinns tlrat the Base Bid Grand Total of $2,3 46,443.61 is an inadvertent clerical error. The actualconfinned Base Bid Grand Total is $2,346,443.66. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact the undersigned at (619) 422-g322 or via Email tofranknsonpaving@yalroo.com Sincerely, 1 Response to Request for Clarifications Major Pavement Rehabilitation Fy20l71201g (STM393) and Bonita Road arid Allen School Lane Intersection Improvements (STL4lg) CIP# STM393/STL418 FRANK PO BOX 698; BONITA, CA 91908 (619) 422-8322 FAX (6rg) 420_9020 E mail : fran kns onp aving@ta h o o. com 263 264 265 P a g e | 1 August 14, 2018 File ID: 18-0323 TITLE RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2018- 19 CIP BUDGET TO ESTABLISH A NEW CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, CVEATC BRIDGE REPAIR FY2018-19 (GGV0241), AND APPROPRIATING $250,000 TO THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND BASED ON UNANTICIPATED REVENUE FROM LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY (4/5 VOTE REQUIRED) RECOMMENDED ACTION Council adopt the resolution. SUMMARY On February 1, 2018, the Chula Vista Elite Athlete Training Center pedestrian bridge was struck by an inbound semi-truck causing a section of the bridge to collapse. Also on March 31, 2018, the pedestrian bridge was subsequently struck by an outbound semi-truck causing minimal damage. The pedestrian bridge was initially designed with a vertical clearance of 14 feet that does not accommodate semi-trucks and is the primary entrance for deliveries. City staff filed a claim with the City’s insurance broker, Alliance Insurance Services, and the City’s property insurer, Lexington Insurance Company, has agreed to cover the costs associated with bridge repairs and raising the bridge to 16 feetto provide appropriate clearance. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Director of Development Services has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the project qualifies for a Class 1 Categorical Exemption pursuant to Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) of the State CEQA Guidelines. Thus, no further environmental review is required. BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION Not Applicable DISCUSSION In 2014, the United States Olympic Committee (“USOC”) approached the City to determine if the City would be interested in acquiring the Chula Vista Olympic Training Center land, facilities and equipment, and in continuing to operate the facility as a U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Training Site. On April 12, 2016, the City approved an agreement to operate the facility (now known as the Chula Vista Elite Athlete Training Facility) with Elite Athlete Services, LLC. Subsequent to the bridge collapse, City staff filed a claim with the City’s insurance broker, Alliance Insurance Services. Pursuant to that claim, the City was informed that the 266 P a g e | 2 City’s staff costs will not be reimbursable under the claim, and therefore consultants, whose costs will be reimbursable, will be retained for design and construction services. Pursuant to the claim, the City’s property insurer (Lexington Insurance Company) has advanced payment under the claim in the amount of $250,000. City staff is creating a CIP project (GGV0241) to develop a scope of repair work. DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT Staff has reviewed the property holdings of the Council members and has found that Stephen Padilla Council Member District 3 has property holdings within 500 feet of the boundaries of the property which is the subject of this action. However, the decision solely concerns repairs, replacement or maintenance of existing streets, water, sewer, storm drainage or similar facilities. Consequently, pursuant to California Code of Regulations Title 2, sections 18700 and 18702.2(c)(1)), this item does not present a real property- related conflict of interest under the Political Reform Act (Cal. Gov't Code § 87100, et seq.). Staff is not independently aware, and has not been informed by any City Council member, of any other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter. LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS The City’s Strategic Plan has five major goals: Operational Excellence, Economic Vitality, Healthy Community, Strong and Secure Neighborhoods and a Connected Community. The operations of the Olympic Training Center support the Economic Vitality goal as the City will be able to maximize the use of this valuable asset as an economic driver. Continued operations will also support the Healthy Community goal because it will provide the highest level of fitness, training and nutrition for elite athletes (both resident and visiting). Fitness, training and nutrition education and activities are also expected to be continued and expanded for local residents and programs. CURRENT-YEARFISCAL IMPACT Approval of this resolution will appropriate $250,000 to CIP GGV0241 to cover design costs associated with the bridge repair. Consultants will be utilized for design and repair work. Staff costs associated with oversight of the design and repair work for the entire project is estimated at $75,000 and is not eligible for reimbursement from the insurance claim. Therefore, staff estimates a General Fund impact in the Engineering Department which may be mitigated through other cost saving opportunities or additional revenues in the current fiscal year. Updates will be provided as part of the quarterly fiscal update to the City Council. The preliminary bridge repair estimate ranges from $1.3 to $2.3 million. Staff will return to Council to appropriate funds for construction after concurrence of the project scope from the Insurance provider. ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT Upon completion of the project, the improvements will require routine maintenance. ATTACHMENTS Attachment 1 – Advance Payment Check Attachment 2 – CVEATC As-built 267 P a g e | 3 Staff Contact: Jose Luis Gomez, Principal Civil Engineer 268 RESOLUTION NO. 2018________ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2018-19 CIP BUDGET TO ESTABLISH A NEW CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, CVEATC BRIDGE REPAIR FY2018-19 (GGV0241), AND APPROPRIATING $250,000 TO THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND BASED ON UNANTICIPATED REVENUE FROM LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY (4/5 VOTE REQUIRED) WHEREAS, on February 1, 2018 the Chula Vista Elite Athlete Training Center pedestrian bridge was struck by an inbound semi-truck causing the bridge to collapse; and WHEREAS, the pedestrian bridge was initially designed with a vertical clearance of 14 feet that does not accommodate semi-trucks and is the primary entrance for deliveries; and WHEREAS, a claim was filed for the occurrence and the City’s property insurer, Lexington Insurance Company, has advanced a payment of $250,000 pursuant to the claim; and WHEREAS, an unknown amount of additional revenue may be needed to complete the repairs and additional appropriations may be needed; and WHEREAS, Staff recommends establishing a CIP for the CVEATC Bridge Repair FY2018-2019 (GGV0241) and appropriating the advance payment of $250,000 to that CIP budget. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista that it amends the Fiscal Year 2018-19 budget to establish new a Capital Improvement Project, CVEATC Bridge Repair FY2018-2019 (GGV0241), and appropriates $250,000 to the Capital Improvement Fund based on unanticipated revenue from Lexington Insurance Company to CIP GGV0241. Presented by: ___________________________________________________ William S. Valle Glen R. Googins Director of Engineering & Capital City Attorney Projects/ City Engineer 269 270 271 P a g e | 1 August 14, 2018 File ID: 18-0339 TITLE RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES TO PREPARE A DOWNTOWN PARKING MANAGEMENT STUDY TO CHEN RYAN ASSOCIATES IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $151,449.00 RECOMMENDED ACTION Council adopt the resolution. SUMMARY The Downtown Parking District was established in 1963 and consists of approximately 1,600 spaces in individually metered spaces, 6 metered parking lots, and one free public parking structure. As downtown Chula Vista emerges as a popular dining and entertainment district and sees new infill residential development moving towards construction, demands on parking have increased. To develop a comprehensive approach to managing parking in downtown, the City released a Request for Proposals to prepare a Parking Management Study to evaluate current parking conditions, assess current operational practices, estimate future parking demands, and develop strategies for meeting expected future parking needs in concert with existing and future mobility opportunities. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Director of Development Services has reviewed the proposed activity for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines because it will not result in a physical change in the environment; therefore, pursuant to Section 15060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Thus, no environmental review is required. BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION City staff have presented the scope of work for the proposed Downtown Parking Management Study to the Third Avenue Village Association Board and incorporated their input in the RFP. DISCUSSION The City last commissioned a Downtown Parking Study in 2006 that was approved by City Council in 2007. Since that time the City Redevelopment Agency has sold 4 public parking lots for redevelopment. In addition, a number of recommendations made by the previous study werenever implemented. A new 272 P a g e | 2 study will help refocus the City’s downtown parking management efforts, provide new analysis of current and future parking demands given new and planned development; and suggest appropriate operational, financing, and technology strategies to support a vibrant downtown. Because of the size, scope, and complexity of the Downtown Parking Management Study, staff conducted a RFP seeking qualified firms . Staff followed Chula Vista Municipal Code Section 2.56.110.C in the consultant selection process. As required, an RFP was prepared, advertised and posted on PlanetBids -- the City’s third party bidplatform. Over 200 vendors were notified, 36 downloaded the RFP. The City received four responses and all four were interviewed by a cross-departmental panel. Downtown Parking Management Study Panel: Tiffany Allen – Assistant Director, Development Services David Bilby – Director, Finance Eric Crockett – Director, Economic Development Bill Valle – Director, Engineering & Capital Projects Kelly Broughton –Director, Development Services The four respondents were: Chen Ryan Associates IBI Group Kimley Horn Walker Consultants After careful review, the Panel selected Chen Ryan Associates to conduct the study. Their proposal, team qualifications, presentation, familiarity with Chula Vista, and answers to questions from the panel demonstrated that they were best qualified to conduct the project for the City. They also demonstrated their extensive experience working with municipal and other governmental agencies on similar projects. The amount for the consultant services performed shall not exceed $151,499 (base contract of $131,695 with a contingency if needed at the discretion of the City). DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT Not Applicable –Not Site-Specific Staff has reviewed the decision contemplated by this action and has determined that it is not site-specific and consequently, the 500-foot rule found in California Code of Regulations Title 2, section 18702.2(a)(11), is not applicable to this decision for purposes of determining a disqualifying real property-related financial conflict of interest under the Political Reform Act (Cal. Gov't Code § 87100, et seq.). Staff is not independently aware, and has not been informed by any City Council member, of any other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter. 273 P a g e | 3 LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS The City’s Strategic Plan has five major goals: Operational Excellence, Economic Vitality, Healthy Community, Strong and Secure Neighborhoods and a Connected Community. The Downtown Parking Management Study results will support Economic Vitality by helping the City to promote an environment for residents and businesses to prosper buy facilitating appropriate access to parking. CURRENT-YEAR FISCAL IMPACT Funding for the Downtown Parking Management Study will be provided from revenue collected in the Downtown Parking District. ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT It is anticipated that ongoing funding to implement recommendations from the Downtown Parking Management Study will also be provided from revenue collected in the Downtown Parking District. ATTACHMENTS Attachment 1 – Request for Proposals – Downtown Parking Management Study Attachment 2 -Contract with Chen Ryan Associates Staff Contact: Kelly Broughton, Director, Development Services (619) 691-5233 274 C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@D83AB855\@BCL@D83AB855.doc RESOLUTION NO. __________ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES TO PREPARE A DOWNTOWN PARKING MANAGEMENT STUDY TO CHEN RYAN ASSOCIATES IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $151,449.00 WHEREAS, Chula Vista Municipal Code Section 2.56.110 authorizes the City Council to award consultant contracts for professional services that exceed $50,000; and WHEREAS, City staff desires to obtain a downtown parking management study with an analysis of current and future parking demands given new and planned development, and suggestions on appropriate operational, financing, and technology strategies; and WHEREAS, the City prepared Request For Proposals (RFP) P21-1718 in order to retain a consultant to provide a detailed downtown parking management study to the City; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Chula Vista Municipal Code Section 2.56.110.C, the City solicited responses to the RFP and selected Chen Ryan Associates as the most qualified firm to provide the requested services due to their extensive experience and background in this field; and WHEREAS, the Director of Development Services has negotiated a proposed contract in an amount not to exceed $151,449.00, and the selection committee recommends that the City Council award that contract to Chen Ryan Associates. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, that it approves the City of Chula Vista Consultant Services Agreement with Chen Ryan Associates to Provide Downtown Parking Management Study Services, in the form presented, with such minor modifications as may be required or approved by the City Attorney, a copy of which shall be kept on file in the Office of the City Clerk, and authorizes and directs the City Manager to execute same. Presented by Kelly Broughton Development Services Director Approved as to form by Glen R. Googins City Attorney 275 RFP P21-1718 April 9, 2018 ATTACHMENT No. 1 1 | P a g e THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL RFP P21-1718 Notice is hereby given that proposals will be received until 12:00 P.M. on Friday, May 4, 2018, Pacific Standard Time (PST), furnishing the City of Chula Vista with: Downtown Parking Management Study Prospective respondents are hereby referred to the proposal instructions, general provisions, and terms and conditions contained in this request for proposal. All proposals must be submitted through PlanetBids by the due date and time. Late proposals will not be considered. Questions related to the proposal must be submitted to Victor De La Cruz vdelacruz@chulavistaca.gov. Questions must be received by 3:00 pm Friday April 20, 2018. Answers will be uploaded as an addendum in PlanetBids no later than 5:00 pm Thursday April 26, 2018. The City reserves the right to reject any or all proposals received, any portion of any proposal, and to waive any irregularities or informalities in proposals or the RFP process. Any addenda that are issued through this RFP must be signed and returned with your submittal. Victor De La Cruz Senior Procurement Specialist Telephone number: 619-409-5959 Fax number: 619-691-5149 276 RFP P21-1718 April 9, 2018 ATTACHMENT No. 1 2 | P a g e Schedule Activity Date RFP Posted to PlanetBids April 9, 2018 Question Submittal through PlanetBids April 20, 2018 no later than 3:00 pm Response to Questions Released April 26, 2018 no later than 5:00 pm Parking Management Study RFP Response and Proposal Due May 4, 2018 no later than 12:00 pm Parking Management Study Presentations/Interviews May 2018 Selection of Contractor May 2018 Council Adoption June 2018 Contract Inception June 2018 Objective The City of Chula Vista is seeking proposals from qualified organizations to conduct a downtown parking management study. The City is requesting the following proposal: Downtown Parking Management Study The successful bidder will analyze parking needs and parking availability and develop recommendations to improve parking in the study area. If your firm is interested and qualified, please submit Three (3) hard copies of your response to Victor De La Cruz, 276 4th Ave, Building A - Finance, Chula Vista, CA 91910. In addition to the hard copies, the City requires that a proposal, in its entirety, be submitted on a CD or USB flash drive. Please provide the electronic copy as a PDF (not a scanned PDF). All items must be received no later than 12:00 PM on Friday, May 4, 2018. 277 RFP P21-1718 April 9, 2018 ATTACHMENT No. 1 3 | P a g e Background Chula Vista is located at the center of one of the richest cultural, economic and environmentally diverse zones in the United States. It is the second-largest City in San Diego County with a population of nearly 270,000. Chula Vista boasts more than 50 square miles of coastal landscape, canyons, rolling hills, mountains, and a variety of natural resources and quality infrastructure. Established neighborhoods, contemporary communities, start-up firms, corporations, nationally recognized entertainment venues, the nation’s only warm-weather Elite Athlete Training Center, an award-winning nature center and a historic downtown all contribute to Chula Vista’s attraction for both families and businesses. Parking District The Downtown Parking District (See Attached) was established in 1963 and consists of approximately 1,600 spaces. The District includes on-street individually metered spaces, multi- space meters located in 6 public parking lots, one free public parking structure, and non-metered spaces. The District has two-hour parking on-street and four-hour and ten-hour parking in the public parking lots. The hourly parking rates range from $0.50 for two and four-hour meters to $0.25 for ten-hour meters. The City currently contracts with a private company for parking management and enforcement services. Additional information regarding the City may be obtained at www.chulavistaca.gov Scope of Work and Schedule (Required) Project Goals. The following statement of goals outlines the City’s overall desires for the results of this Downtown Parking Management Study.  Evaluate current parking conditions in the Downtown Parking District Study Area (See Attached) including supply and demand for public and private parking.  Assess current operational practices for the City’s parking programs and identify potential improvements.  Estimate future parking demand in the Study Area based on known and projected future development.  Develop strategies for meeting expected future parking demand in concert with existing and future mobility opportunities. The Scope of Work for the Downtown Parking Management Study includes, but is not limited to, the following: A. Analysis of existing downtown parking facilities. 278 RFP P21-1718 April 9, 2018 ATTACHMENT No. 1 4 | P a g e 1. Consider General Plan and Urban Core Specific Plan recommendations for future land use in the Downtown Parking District Study Area. 2. Consult with the Third Avenue Village Association (TAVA) for input on the current and future parking needs. 3. Inventory existing downtown parking facilities, public and private parking spaces, and parking management solutions including review of the results from the previous 2007 Downtown Parking Management Study. 4. On- and off-street parking regulations, bus stops and transit facilities, and outlying surface parking lots should also be inventoried. 5. Survey existing users including businesses and employees; institutions; and customers in the Downtown Parking District Study Area. 6. Analyze seasonal competition for space in public parking facilities between visitors to Chula Vista and local merchant customers and employees, and recommend solutions to alleviate and/or manage conflicts effectively. 7. Survey, quantify, and analyze patterns of use of the existing downtown parking facilities. Survey and analysis of usage should include a representative time period and duration recommended by the consultant that allows the evaluation of day, evening, weekend and peak usage patterns. 8. Analyze bicycle parking facilities and needs. 9. Analyze current enforcement systems, practices, and fees. 10. Analyze current in-lieu fee program. 11. Analyze potential impacts to parking demand of disruptive advances in mobility technologies (e.g. commercial ridesharing, micro-transit, autonomous vehicles, car sharing, bike sharing). Parking supply recommendations should anticipate that demand may decline significantly in future years (surface parking may be preferable to structured). B. Evaluation of various parking strategies that could be used in the downtown area. 1. Evaluate current parking demand, future parking demand, and review of current and future parking needs projected for a period covering now to 10 years in the future. 2. Evaluate free parking versus paid parking within the Parking District Study Area including the distribution of facilities relative to existing and anticipated future development. Evaluation should include fiscal impact analysis comparing parking revenue generated from current pricing structure and the impact free parking within the study area has on the system, as well as impacts on employee parking. 279 RFP P21-1718 April 9, 2018 ATTACHMENT No. 1 5 | P a g e 3. Evaluate expansion of the Parking District boundaries within the study area. 4. Evaluate current parking district impact on surrounding residential neighborhoods adjacent to the Study Area. 5. Evaluate current parking management in on- and off-street parking areas (ex. time limits on parking; meter versus ticket; ticket validation by downtown merchants, etc.). 6. Evaluate state-of-the-art, smart city parking management systems for both on-and off- street parking. 7. Evaluate parking information systems, wayfinding signage, and marketing efforts. 8. Evaluate the impact of current transit services and stops in the downtown area. 9. Evaluate the traffic flow implications of the various parking management strategies recommended. 10. Evaluate parking standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance as it relates to parking layout, quantity and design. 11. Evaluate current agreement between the City and the Centre City Associates Limited-Commercial and Marie Callender Ventures, Inc. for the Chula Vista parking structure with respect to parking maintenance and management and identify options for modifications or new agreement structures to accomplish recommended actions, which could also include agreements with other downtown uses. 12. Evaluate parking solutions that have been used in other similarly sized parking and business improvement districts to identify best practices and solutions that could apply to Chula Vista. 13. Evaluate the benefits and impacts of shared bicycle deployment on the Downtown Parking District C. Development of an overall parking management plan for on- and off-street parking facilities in the downtown area. Consultant shall be responsible for the preparation and recommendations of strategies for short and long-term parking improvements that combine parking and traffic system and management improvements, along with capital improvements including, at a minimum, the following tasks. 1. Recommend how current parking facilities in the Downtown Parking District Study Area can be more effectively managed (time limits, pay versus free, metering, valet service etc.). If more parking is needed, recommend locations for future surface and/or a structured facility(s) in the Downtown Parking District Study Area including financing and phasing recommendations. 2. Recommend any needed modifications to existing cooperative agreements on parking facilities between the City and the Centre City Associates Limited-Commercial and Marie Callender Ventures, Inc. for the Chula Vista parking structure, and recommend any new agreements that are needed with other uses in the study area. 280 RFP P21-1718 April 9, 2018 ATTACHMENT No. 1 6 | P a g e 3. Recommend any needed changes to the parking standards contained in the Urban Core Specific Plan and Citywide parking regulations. 4. Recommend any appropriate changes to the transit services and stops to improve access to downtown amenities drive economic activity, and encourage transit use. 5. Recommend any appropriate wayfinding or other strategies to encourage pedestrian, bicycle, and transit access to downtown to reduce parking demand, and to improve the use of parking facilities. 6. Recommend additional parking options for large events held downtown when streets are closed (ex. Lemon Festival and Starlight Parade). 7. Recommend countermeasures to minimize or offset impacts to surrounding residential neighborhoods outside the Study Area that could be caused by future parking strategies and recommendations. 8. Recommend state-of-the-art, smart city parking management systems for both on-and off- street parking. 9. Recommend appropriate controls on shared bicycle implementation. D. Deliverables. The following shall be provided to the City during or at the conclusion of the study as noted: 1. At the conclusion of the Analysis and Evaluation tasks described in Section A. and B. above, provide a Preliminary Report including the compilation of data, analysis of the current parking system, current and future parking demand, assessment of future parking system needs, and a rate analysis (Five printed copies) 2. Downtown Parking Management Study addressing the specified Scope of Work in Section A, B, and C above and associated Exhibits, all in Word and PDF formats. The Downtown Parking Study text shall include an Implementation Plan with cost estimates and phasing. (Five printed copies) 3. PowerPoint presentations for the Preliminary Report and the Parking Management Study. E. Attendance at Meetings. The consultant shall attend at a minimum, the following meetings: 1. Initial meeting with City staff team to present outline of proposal for the study. 2. Meetings with City staff team and TAVA parking task force, as necessary, during the development of the study. (Minimum 5 meetings) 3. Present Preliminary Report to City staff team and TAVA parking task force and secure input on initial recommendations. 281 RFP P21-1718 April 9, 2018 ATTACHMENT No. 1 7 | P a g e 4. Formal Presentation - present Preliminary Report to City Council and secure input on initial recommendations. 5. Present first draft of the Downtown Parking Management Study to City staff team and Study Work Group for review. 6. Formal presentation - present final draft of the Downtown Parking Management Study at a City Council meeting for approval. F. Material Provided to Consultant by City 1. Base map showing property line locations, street locations, including aerial photograph of the study area. 2. Copies of previous studies, including traffic and parking studies and agreement between the City and the Centre City Associates Limited-Commercial and Marie Callender Ventures, Inc. for the Chula Vista parking structure. 3. Copies of the Urban Core Specific Plan and Municipal Code are available on the City’s website at www.chulavistaca.gov 4. Detail on the existing Chula Vista parking structure and City parking lot and spaces usage trends including demand for monthly parking passes. 282 RFP P21-1718 April 9, 2018 ATTACHMENT No. 1 8 | P a g e Proposal Form and Content The City will accept proposals in accordance with the instructions and specifications in this Request for Proposal (RFP). A. Provide one (1) original and two (2) copies of your proposal, along with one electronic copy on a CD or USB Flash Drive. B. Proposals should be submitted in the following order: 1. Cover Letter 2. Qualifications a) Provide an overall descriptive summary of your firm and its scope of business, specifically as it relates to conducting parking studies. This description should also include a case study that illustrates your experience in this area, where the proposed team members served as lead consultants. b) Identify the project lead that will be responsible for day-to-day management of the study. Provide a summary of the professional qualifications of those personnel in your firm who would be assigned to the City. Outline briefly their areas of expertise, their office location and availability, and the extent to which they may be available at all times, upon reasonable request, to meet with City staff in order to carry out their duties. 3. Work Program a) Describe your approach to completing the work, including an estimated schedule. 4. Pricing Proposal a) Proposed compensation and payment schedule tied to accomplishing key tasks. 5. Other information your firm would like us to consider. C. The City reserves the right to amend, alter, or revoke this Request for Proposal at or before the due date and time of proposal. Any modifications, clarifications, or additions will be distributed via email as an addendum through PlanetBids. D. Contractors may withdraw their proposal, either personally or by written request, at any time prior to the scheduled closing time of proposals. Such requests should be directed to Victor De La Cruz, Sr Procurement Specialist at vdelacruz@chulavistaca.gov. E. If, in the course of the Request for Proposal process or in the administration of the resulting contract, the City determines that the contractor has made a material misstatement or misrepresentation or that materially inaccurate information has been provided to the City, contractor may be terminated from the Request for Proposal process or in the event a contract has been awarded, the contract may be immediately terminated. F. The City will not be liable for any costs associated with the preparation or transmittal of any proposal or material submitted in response to this RFP. The City is not obligated to explain any deficiencies in a 283 RFP P21-1718 April 9, 2018 ATTACHMENT No. 1 9 | P a g e proposal, nor accept requests for justification from bidders not selected. All responses and documentation become the property of the City. G. The City reserves the right to conduct interviews or require oral presentations of any or all contractors prior to selection. H. The contractor shall furnish additional information as the City may reasonably require. The City reserves the right to make investigation of the qualifications of the contractor, as deemed appropriate. I. By submitting a proposal, contractor certifies that he/she has fully read and understands the Request for Proposal and has full knowledge of the scope, nature, quantity and quality of service to be performed. J. If the contractor does not execute a contract with the City within sixty (60) days after notification of award, the City may give notice to the CONTRACTOR of the City’s intent to select from the remaining contractors or to call for new proposals, whichever the City deems appropriate. K. Proposals should expressly state that the offer, including all pricing proposals, will remain in effect through the duration of the contract. L. The information contained in this RFP is given solely for the purpose of inviting parties to prepare proposals for claims administration services, and is to be kept confidential during the period of proposal development and thereafter. The City will keep propriety information contained in the contractor’s responses confidential unless disclosure is required in response to a proper request under the California Public Records Act, California Government Code Section 6250 or required by court order. M. Complete the attached “Questionnaire” (Attachment B) in its entirety as a requirement of this RFP. It must be submitted in order for your proposal to be considered complete. N. The City is under no obligation to award this project and under no obligation to award this project to the proposal that represents the lowest cost. The contract may be awarded on the basis of demonstrated competence and on the professional qualifications necessary for the satisfactory performance of the services required. O. The City reserve the right to reject any or all proposals or to accept any proposal deemed to be in its best interest. All answers supplied to questions asked in this RFP are subject to verification. Misleading and inaccurate answers will be grounds for disqualification at any stage in the evaluation and procurement process. P. Submitting vendors whose proposals are not accepted will be notified after the successful firm has been selected and notified. Q. The relationship between the City and the company selected to conduct its contractor services shall be governed by a contract that must be approved by the City Council. Upon the City’s acceptance of 284 RFP P21-1718 April 9, 2018 ATTACHMENT No. 1 10 | P a g e a proposal, the successful contractor will be required to negotiate and execute the Contract. Any proposed waiver or change in the Contract must be identified in your proposal and will be subject to the City’s sole approval. R. The City may, by written notice of default to the vendor, terminate any services resulting from this Contract in whole or in part should the contractor fail to make satisfactory progress, fail to deliver within the time specified herein or fail to deliver in strict conformance to specifications and requirements set forth herein. In the event of such termination, the contractor shall return all City’ data and files within ten (10) days of request and the City reserves the right to purchase or obtain the services elsewhere, and the defaulting contractor shall be liable for the difference between the prices set forth in the terminated order and the actual cost thereof to the City. The prevailing market price shall be considered the fair repurchase price. S. In the event the City should prevail in any litigation brought by either party, to enforce any provisions of this proposal, the contractor shall pay to the City the cost and attorney fees incurred pursuant to said litigation. T. The contractor will have thirty (30) calendar days from “Notification of Selection” in which to provide required insurance forms and bond as outlined in the Standard Professional Services Agreement (Attachment D) and to provide three (3) signed copies of the agreement. The City will provide the contractor with three (3) sets of the Agreement of which all sets must be executed and returned promptly. Services may not commence until the Agreement is fully executed and approved by City Council. Evaluation Criteria The award to the successful contractor will be based upon response to the requirements and questions outlined in this RFP, and an estimate of the quality and effectiveness of each contractor’s services in the following areas (not listed in order of importance): 1. Relevant experience of firm 2. Education and experience of staff 3. Ability to consistently meet Scope of Work guidelines 4. High quality references from clients 5. Overall cost Attachment: Downtown Parking Management Study Area 285 RFP P21-1718 April 9, 2018 ATTACHMENT No. 1 11 | P a g e 286 ?City of Chula Vista Agreement No.: 180681 Consultant Name: Chen Ryan Associates Rev. 10/24/17 CITY OF CHULA VISTA CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH CHEN RYAN ASSOCIATES TO PROVIDE DOWNTOWN PARKING MANAGEMENT STUDY SERVICES This Agreement is entered into effective as of August 14, 2018(“Effective Date”)by and between the City of Chula Vista, a chartered municipal corporation (“City”) and Chen Ryan Associates (“Consultant”) (collectively, the “Parties” and, individually, a “Party”) with reference to the following facts: RECITALS WHEREAS,The City wishes to have a vibrant and active downtown that supports local businesses and limits parking impacts on nearby residential neighborhoods;and WHEREAS,In order to achieve our goals of developing a long-term downtown parking mangement plan, it is important to conduct a thorough analysis of current and future parking demands given new and planned development; and suggest appropriate operational, financing, and technology strategies; and WHEREAS, The City conducted Request For Proposal P21-1718 in order to identify and select a consultant to provide a detailed Downtown Parking Management Study to the City; and WHEREAS, Request For Proposal P21-1718 (See Attachment #1) outlines the scope of the project for the consultant to explore the various parking management options available which provide a cost effective and long term approach to the City’s downtown parking management; and WHEREAS, Chen Ryan Associates was selected by the City to provide this Parking Management Study due to their extensive experience and background in this field ;and WHEREAS, Consultant warrants and represents that it is experienced and staffed in a manner such that it can deliver the services required of Consultant to City in accordance with the time frames and the terms and conditions of this Agreement. [End of Recitals. Next Page Starts Obligatory Provisions.] 287 ?City of Chula Vista Agreement No.: 180681 Consultant Name: Chen Ryan Associates Rev. 10/24/17 OBLIGATORY PROVISIONS NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above recitals, the covenants contained herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which the Parties hereby acknowledge, City and Consultant hereby agree as follows: 1. SERVICES 1.1 Required Services. Consultant agrees to perform the services, and deliver to City the “Deliverables” (if any)described in the attached Exhibit A,incorporated into the Agreement by this reference, within the time frames set forth therein, time being of the essence for this Agreement. The services and/or Deliverables described in Exhibit A shall be referred to herein as the “Required Services.” 1.2 Reductions in Scope of Work. City may independently, or upon request from Consultant, from time to time, reduce the Required Services to be performed by the Consultant under this Agreement. Upon doing so, City and Consultant agree to meet and confer in good faith for the purpose of negotiating a corresponding reduction in the compensation associated with the reduction. 1.3 Additional Services. Subject to compliance with the City’s Charter, codes, policies, procedures and ordinances governing procurement and purchasing authority, City may request Consultant provide additional services related to the Required Services (“Additional Services”). If so, City and Consultant agree to meet and confer in good faith for the purpose of negotiating an amendment to Exhibit A, to add the Additional Services. Unless otherwise agreed, compensation for the Additional Services shall be charged and paid consistent with the rates and terms already provided therein. Once added to Exhibit A, “Additional Services” shall also become “Required Services” for purposes of this Agreement. 1.4 Standard of Care. Consultant expressly warrants and agrees that any and all Required Services hereunder shall be performed in accordance with the highest standard of care exercised by members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions and in similar locations. 1.5 No Waiver of Standard of Care. Where approval by City is required, it is understood to be conceptual approval only and does not relieve the Consultant of responsibility for complying with all laws, codes, industry standards, and liability for damages caused by negligent acts, errors, omissions, noncompliance with industry standards, or the willful misconduct of the Consultant or its subcontractors. 1.6 Security for Performance. In the event that Exhibit A Section 4 indicates the need for Consultant to provide additional security for performance of its duties under this Agreement, Consultant shall provide such additional security prior to commencement of its Required Services in the form and on the terms prescribed on Exhibit A, or as otherwise prescribed by the City Attorney. 1.7 Compliance with Laws.In its performance of the Required Services, Consultant shall comply with any and all applicable federal, state and local laws, including the Chula Vista Municipal Code. 288 ?City of Chula Vista Agreement No.: 180681 Consultant Name: Chen Ryan Associates Rev. 10/24/17 1.8 Business License. Prior to commencement of work, Consultant shall obtain a business license from City. 1.9 Subcontractors. Prior to commencement of any work, Consultant shall submit for City’s information and approval a list of any and all subcontractors to be used by Consultant in the performance of the Required Services. Consultant agrees to take appropriate measures necessary to ensure that all subcontractors and personnel utilized by the Consultant to complete its obligations under this Agreement comply with all applicable laws, regulations, ordinances, and policies, whether federal, state, or local. In addition, if any subcontractor is expected to fulfill any responsibilities of the Consultant under this Agreement, Consultant shall ensure that each and every subcontractor carries out the Consultant’s responsibilities as set forth in this Agreement. 1.10 Term. This Agreement shall commence on the earlier to occur of the Effective Date or Consultant’s commencement of the Required Services hereunder, and shall terminate when the Parties have complied with all their obligations hereunder; provided, however, provisions which expressly survive termination shall remain in effect. 2.COMPENSATION 2.1 General. For satisfactory performance of the Required Services, City agrees to compensate Consultant in the amount(s) and on the terms set forth in Exhibit A, Section 4. Standard terms for billing and payment are set forth in this Section 2. 2.2 Detailed Invoicing.Consultant agrees to provide City with a detailed invoice for services performed each month, within thirty (30) days of the end of the month in which the services were performed, unless otherwise specified in Exhibit A. Invoicing shall begin on the first of the month following the Effective Date of the Agreement. All charges must be presented in a line item format with each task separately explained in reasonable detail. Each invoice shall include the current monthly amount being billed, the amount invoiced to date, and the remaining amount available under any approved budget. Consultant must obtain prior written authorization from City for any fees or expenses that exceed the estimated budget. 2.3 Payment to Consultant. Upon receipt of a properly prepared invoice and confirmation that the Required Services detailed in the invoice have been satisfactorily performed, City shall pay Consultant for the invoice amount within thirty (30) days. Payment shall be made in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in Exhibit A and section 2.4, below. At City’s discretion, invoices not timely submitted may be subject to a penalty of up to five percent (5%) of the amount invoiced. 2.4 Retention Policy.City shall retain ten percent (10%)of the amount due for Required Services detailed on each invoice (the “holdback amount”). Upon City review and determination of Project Completion, the holdback amount will be issued to Consultant. 2.5 Reimbursement of Costs. City may reimburse Consultant’s out-of-pocket costs incurred by Consultant in the performance of the Required Services if negotiated in advance and included in Exhibit A. Unless specifically provided in Exhibit A, Consultant shall be responsible for any and all out-of-pocket costs incurred by Consultant in the performance of the Required Services. 289 ?City of Chula Vista Agreement No.: 180681 Consultant Name: Chen Ryan Associates Rev. 10/24/17 2.6 Exclusions. City shall not be responsible for payment to Consultant for any fees or costs in excess of any agreed upon budget, rate or other maximum amount(s) provided for in Exhibit A. City shall also not be responsible for any cost: (a) incurred prior to the Effective Date; or (b) arising out of or related to the errors, omissions, negligence or acts of willful misconduct of Consultant, its agents, employees, or subcontractors. 2.7 Payment Not Final Approval. Consultant understands and agrees that payment to the Consultant or reimbursement for any Consultant costs related to the performance of Required Services does not constitute a City final decision regarding whether such payment or cost reimbursement is allowable and eligible for payment under this Agreement, nor does it constitute a waiver of any violation by Consultant of the terms of this Agreement. If City determines that Consultant is not entitled to receive any amount of compensation already paid, City will notify Consultant in writing and Consultant shall promptly return such amount. 3.INSURANCE 3.1 Required Insurance. Consultant must procure and maintain, during the period of performance of Required Services under this Agreement, and for twelve months after completion of Required Services, the policies of insurance described on the attached Exhibit B,incorporated into the Agreement by this reference (the “Required Insurance”). The Required Insurance shall also comply with all other terms of this Section. 3.2 Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions relating to the Required Insurance must be disclosed to and approved by City in advance of the commencement of work. 3.3 Standards for Insurers. Required Insurance must be placed with licensed insurers admitted to transact business in the State of California with a current A.M. Best’s rating of A V or better, or, if insurance is placed with a surplus lines insurer, insurer must be listed on the State of California List of Eligible Surplus Lines Insurers (LESLI) with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A X. For Workers’Compensation Insurance, insurance issued by the State Compensation Fund is also acceptable. 3.4 Subcontractors. Consultant must include all sub-consultants/sub-contractors as insureds under its policies and/or furnish separate certificates and endorsements demonstrating separate coverage for those not under its policies. Any separate coverage for sub-consultants must also comply with the terms of this Agreement. 3.5 Additional Insureds. City, its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers must be named as additional insureds with respect to any policy of general liability, automobile, or pollution insurance specified as required in Exhibit B or as may otherwise be specified by City’s Risk Manager.. The general liability additional insured coverage must be provided in the form of an endorsement to the Consultant’s insurance using ISO CG 2010 (11/85) or its equivalent; such endorsement must not exclude Products/Completed Operations coverage. 3.6 General Liability Coverage to be “Primary.”Consultant’s general liability coverage must be primary insurance as it pertains to the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers is wholly separate 290 ?City of Chula Vista Agreement No.: 180681 Consultant Name: Chen Ryan Associates Rev. 10/24/17 from the insurance provided by Consultant and in no way relieves Consultant from its responsibility to provide insurance. 3.7 No Cancellation.No Required Insurance policy may be canceled by either Party during the required insured period under this Agreement, except after thirty days’ prior written notice to the City by certified mail, return receipt requested. Prior to the effective date of any such cancellation Consultant must procure and put into effect equivalent coverage(s). 3.8 Waiver of Subrogation. Consultant’s insurer(s) will provide a Waiver of Subrogation in favor of the City for each Required Insurance policy under this Agreement. In addition, Consultant waives any right it may have or may obtain to subrogation for a claim against City. 3.9 Verification of Coverage. Prior to commencement of any work, Consultant shall furnish City with original certificates of insurance and any amendatory endorsements necessary to demonstrate to City that Consultant has obtained the Required Insurance in compliance with the terms of this Agreement. The words “will endeavor” and “but failure to mail such notice shall impose no obligation or liability of any kind upon the company, its agents, or representatives” or any similar language must be deleted from all certificates. The required certificates and endorsements should otherwise be on industry standard forms. The City reserves the right to require, at any time, complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements evidencing the coverage required by these specifications. 3.10 Claims Made Policy Requirements. If General Liability, Pollution and/or Asbestos Pollution Liability and/or Errors & Omissions coverage are required and are provided on a claims-made form, the following requirements also apply: a.The “Retro Date” must be shown, and must be before the date of this Agreement or the beginning of the work required by this Agreement. b.Insurance must be maintained, and evidence of insurance must be provided, for at least five (5) years after completion of the work required by this Agreement. c.If coverage is canceled or non-renewed, and not replaced with another claims-made policy form with a “Retro Date” prior to the effective date of this Agreement, the Consultant must purchase “extended reporting” coverage for a minimum of five (5) years after completion of the work required by this Agreement. d.A copy of the claims reporting requirements must be submitted to the City for review. 3.11 Not a Limitation of Other Obligations. Insurance provisions under this section shall not be construed to limit the Consultant’s obligations under this Agreement, including Indemnity. 3.12 Additional Coverage. To the extent that insurance coverage provided by Consultant maintains higher limits than the minimums appearing in Exhibit B, City requires and shall be entitled to coverage for higher limits maintained. 291 ?City of Chula Vista Agreement No.: 180681 Consultant Name: Chen Ryan Associates Rev. 10/24/17 4. INDEMNIFICATION 4.1. General. To the maximum extent allowed by law, Consultant shall protect, defend, indemnify and hold harmless City, its elected and appointed officers, agents, employees and volunteers (collectively, “Indemnified Parties”), from and against any and all claims, demands, causes of action, costs, expenses, (including reasonable attorneys’ fees and court costs), liability, loss, damage or injury, in law or equity, to property or persons, including wrongful death, in any manner arising out of or incident to any alleged acts, omissions, negligence, or willful misconduct of Consultant, its officials, officers, employees, agents, and contractors, arising out of or in connection with the performance of the Required Services, the results of such performance, or this Agreement. This indemnity provision does not include any claims, damages, liability, costs and expenses arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the Indemnified Parties. Also covered is liability arising from, connected with, caused by or claimed to be caused by the active or passive negligent acts or omissions of the Indemnified Parties which may be in combination with the active or passive negligent acts or omissions of the Consultant, its employees, agents or officers, or any third party. 4.2. Modified Indemnity Where Agreement Involves Design Professional Services. Notwithstanding the forgoing, if the services provided under this Agreement are design professional services, as defined by California Civil Code section 2782.8, as may be amended from time to time, the defense and indemnity obligation under Section 1, above, shall be limited to the extent required by California Civil Code section 2782.8. 4.3 Costs of Defense and Award. Included in Consultant’s obligations under this Section 4 is Consultant’s obligation to defend, at Consultant’s own cost, expense and risk, any and all suits, actions or other legal proceedings that may be brought or instituted against one or more of the Indemnified Parties. Subject to the limitations in this Section 4, Consultant shall pay and satisfy any judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against one or more of the Indemnified Parties for any and all related legal expenses and costs incurred by any of them. 4.4. Consultant’s Obligations Not Limited or Modified. Consultant’s obligations under this Section 4 shall not be limited to insurance proceeds, if any, received by the Indemnified Parties, or by any prior or subsequent declaration by the Consultant. Furthermore, Consultant’s obligations under this Section 4 shall in no way limit, modify or excuse any of Consultant’s other obligations or duties under this Agreement. 4.5. Enforcement Costs. Consultant agrees to pay any and all costs City incurs in enforcing Consultant’s obligations under this Section 4. 4.6 Survival. Consultant’s obligations under this Section 4 shall survive the termination of this Agreement. 5.FINANCIAL INTERESTS OF CONSULTANT. 5.1 Form 700 Filing.The California Political Reform Act and the Chula Vista Conflict of Interest Code require certain government officials and consultants performing work for government agencies to publicly disclose certain of their personal assets and income using a Statement of Economic Interests form (Form 292 ?City of Chula Vista Agreement No.: 180681 Consultant Name: Chen Ryan Associates Rev. 10/24/17 700). In order to assure compliance with these requirements, Consultant shall comply with the disclosure requirements identified in the attached Exhibit C, incorporated into the Agreement by this reference. 5.2 Disclosures; Prohibited Interests.Independent of whether Consultant is required to file a Form 700, Consultant warrants and represents that it has disclosed to City any economic interests held by Consultant, or its employees or subcontractors who will be performing the Required Services, in any real property or project which is the subject of this Agreement. Consultant warrants and represents that it has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee or approved subcontractor working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants and represents that it has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee or approved subcontractor working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. Consultant further warrants and represents that no officer or employee of City, has any interest, whether contractual, non- contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, the proceeds hereof, or in the business of Consultant or Consultant’s subcontractors. Consultant further agrees to notify City in the event any such interest is discovered whether or not such interest is prohibited by law or this Agreement. For breach or violation of any of these warranties, City shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. 6.REMEDIES 6.1 Termination for Cause. If for any reason whatsoever Consultant shall fail to perform the Required Services under this Agreement, in a proper or timely manner, or if Consultant shall violate any of the other covenants, agreements or conditions of this Agreement (each a “Default”), in addition to any and all other rights and remedies City may have under this Agreement, at law or in equity, City shall have the right to terminate this Agreement by giving five (5) days written notice to Consultant. Such notice shall identify the Default and the Agreement termination date. If Consultant notifies City of its intent to cure such Default prior to City’s specified termination date, and City agrees that the specified Default is capable of being cured, City may grant Consultant up to ten (10) additional days after the designated termination date to effectuate such cure. In the event of a termination under this Section 6.1, Consultant shall immediately provide City any and all ”Work Product” (defined in Section 7 below) prepared by Consultant as part of the Required Services. Such Work Product shall be City’s sole and exclusive property as provided in Section 7 hereof. Consultant may be entitled to compensation for work satisfactorily performed prior to Consultant’s receipt of the Default notice; provided, however, in no event shall such compensation exceed the amount that would have been payable under this Agreement for such work, and any such compensation shall be reduced by any costs incurred or projected to be incurred by City as a result of the Default. 6.2 Termination or Suspension for Convenience of City. City may suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion of the Required Services, at any time and for any reason, with or without cause, by giving specific written notice to Consultant of such termination or suspension at least fifteen (15) days prior to the effective date thereof. Upon receipt of such notice, Consultant shall immediately cease all work under the Agreement and promptly deliver all “Work Product” (defined in Section 7 below) to City. Such Work Product shall be City's sole and exclusive property as provided in Section 7 hereof. Consultant shall be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for this Work Product in an amount equal to the amount due and payable under this Agreement for work satisfactorily performed as of the date of the 293 ?City of Chula Vista Agreement No.: 180681 Consultant Name: Chen Ryan Associates Rev. 10/24/17 termination/suspension notice plus any additional remaining Required Services requested or approved by City in advance that would maximize City’s value under the Agreement. 6.3 Waiver of Claims. In the event City terminates the Agreement in accordance with the terms of this Section, Consultant hereby expressly waives any and all claims for damages or compensation as a result of such termination except as expressly provided in this Section 6. 6.4 Administrative Claims Requirements and Procedures. No suit or arbitration shall be brought arising out of this Agreement against City unless a claim has first been presented in writing and filed with City and acted upon by City in accordance with the procedures set forth in Chapter 1.34 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, as same may be amended, the provisions of which, including such policies and procedures used by City in the implementation of same, are incorporated herein by this reference. Upon request by City, Consultant shall meet and confer in good faith with City for the purpose of resolving any dispute over the terms of this Agreement. 6.5 Governing Law/Venue. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Any action arising under or relating to this Agreement shall be brought only in San Diego County, State of California. 6.6 Service of Process.Consultant agrees that it is subject to personal jurisdiction in California. If Consultant is a foreign corporation, limited liability company, or partnership that is not registered with the California Secretary of State, Consultant irrevocably consents to service of process on Consultant by first class mail directed to the individual and address listed under “For Legal Notice,” in section 1.B. of Exhibit A to this Agreement, and that such service shall be effective five days after mailing. 7.OWNERSHIP AND USE OF WORK PRODUCT All reports, studies, information, data, statistics, forms, designs, plans, procedures, systems and any other materials or properties produced in whole or in part under this Agreement in connection with the performance of the Required Services (collectively “Work Product”) shall be the sole and exclusive property of City. No such Work Product shall be subject to private use, copyrights or patent rights by Consultant in the United States or in any other country without the express, prior written consent of City. City shall have unrestricted authority to publish, disclose, distribute, and otherwise use, copyright or patent, in whole or in part, any such Work Product, without requiring any permission of Consultant, except as may be limited by the provisions of the Public Records Act or expressly prohibited by other applicable laws. With respect to computer files containing data generated as Work Product, Consultant shall make available to City, upon reasonable written request by City, the necessary functional computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring and printing computer files. 8. GENERAL PROVISIONS 8.1 Amendment. This Agreement may be amended, but only in writing signed by both Parties. 294 ?City of Chula Vista Agreement No.: 180681 Consultant Name: Chen Ryan Associates Rev. 10/24/17 8.2 Assignment. City would not have entered into this Agreement but for Consultant’s unique qualifications and traits. Consultant shall not assign any of its rights or responsibilities under this Agreement, nor any part hereof, without City’s prior written consent, which City may grant, condition or deny in its sole discretion. 8.3 Authority. The person(s) executing this Agreement for Consultant warrants and represents that they have the authority to execute same on behalf of Consultant and to bind Consultant to its obligations hereunder without any further action or direction from Consultant or any board, principle or officer thereof. 8.4 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which shall constitute one Agreement after each Party has signed such a counterpart. 8.5 Entire Agreement. This Agreement together with all exhibits attached hereto and other agreements expressly referred to herein, constitutes the entire Agreement between the Parties with respect to the subject matter contained herein. All exhibits referenced herein shall be attached hereto and are incorporated herein by reference. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations, warranties and statements, oral or written, are superseded. 8.6 Record Retention. During the course of the Agreement and for three (3) years following completion of the Required Services,Consultant agrees to maintain, intact and readily accessible, all data, documents, reports, records, contracts, and supporting materials relating to the performance of the Agreement, including accounting for costs and expenses charged to City, including such records in the possession of sub- contractors/sub-consultants. 8.7 Further Assurances. The Parties agree to perform such further acts and to execute and deliver such additional documents and instruments as may be reasonably required in order to carry out the provisions of this Agreement and the intentions of the Parties. 8.8 Independent Contractor. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to City a wholly independent contractor. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees, agents or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant’s officers, employees, or agents (“Consultant Related Individuals”), except as set forth in this Agreement. No Consultant Related Individuals shall be deemed employees of City, and none of them shall be entitled to any benefits to which City employees are entitled, including but not limited to, overtime, retirement benefits, worker's compensation benefits, injury leave or other leave benefits. Furthermore, City will not withhold state or federal income tax, social security tax or any other payroll tax with respect to any Consultant Related Individuals; instead, Consultant shall be solely responsible for the payment of same and shall hold the City harmless with respect to same. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its Consultant Related Individuals are employees or agents of City. Consultant shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatsoever against City, or bind City in any manner. 8.9 Notices. All notices, demands or requests provided for or permitted to be given pursuant to this Agreement must be in writing. All notices, demands and requests to be sent to any Party shall be deemed to have been properly given or served if personally served or deposited in the United States mail, addressed to such Party, postage prepaid, registered or certified, with return receipt requested, at the addresses identified 295 ??City of Chula Vista Agreement No.: 180681 Consultant Name: Chen Ryan Associates Rev. 10/24/17 in this Agreement at the places of business for each of the designated Parties as indicated in Exhibit A, or otherwise provided in writing. (End of page. Next page is signature page.) 296 ??City of Chula Vista Agreement No.: 180681 Consultant Name: Chen Ryan Associates Rev. 10/24/17 SIGNATURE PAGE CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT IN WITNESS WHEREOF, by executing this Agreement where indicated below, City and Consultant agree that they have read and understood all terms and conditions of the Agreement, that they fully agree and consent to bound by same, and that they are freely entering into this Agreement as of the Effective Date. CHEN RYAN ASSOCIATES CITY OF CHULA VISTA BY:________________________________BY: ________________________________ Stephen Cook DAVID BILBY Principal PURCHASING AGENT APPROVED AS TO FORM BY: ________________________________ Glen R. Googins City Attorney 297 ??City of Chula Vista Agreement No.: 180681 Consultant Name: Chen Ryan Associates Rev. 10/24/17 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF WORK AND PAYMENT TERMS 1.Contact People for Contract Administration and Legal Notice A.City Contract Administration: Scott Barker, Senior Transportation Engineer 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista CA 91910 (619) 691 -5247 sbarker@chulavistaca.gov For Legal Notice Copy to: City of Chula Vista City Attorney 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 91910 619-691-5037 CityAttorney@chulavistaca.gov B.Consultant Contract Administration: CHEN RYAN ASSOCIATES 3900 Fifth Ave, Suite 310, San Diego, CA 92103 (619) 795-6086 scook@chenryanmobility.com For Legal Notice Copy to: Stephen Cook, Principal scook@chenryanmobility.com 2.Required Services A.General Description: Chen Ryan Associates will: 298 ??City of Chula Vista Agreement No.: 180681 Consultant Name: Chen Ryan Associates Rev. 10/24/17 •Evaluate current parking conditions in the Downtown Parking District Study Area (See Attached) including supply and demand for public and private parking. •Assess current operational practices for the City’s parking programs and identify potential improvements. •Estimate future parking demand in the Study Area based on known and projected future development. •Develop strategies for meeting expected future parking demand in concert with existing and future mobility opportunities. B.Detailed Description: WORK PLAN The work plan below was developed to flow in a structure consistent with the request for proposal. The efforts of Task A will analyze existing conditions. Task B will evaluate of various parking strategies. Task C covers the breadth of topics from which the study will make recommendations. The deliverables of the study are promised in Task D. Task E covers our commitments to meetings and presentations with City staff, project stakeholders and City Council. The Project Budget and Schedule follow. A -INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS A.1 Review of Relevant Plans, Studies and Projects Chen Ryan Associates will review completed and ongoing plans, studies, policies and projects that may influence the direction of the Downtown Parking District Study and summarize the key content from these documents. At a minimum, the following materials will be reviewed: • 2007 Downtown Parking Management Study • 2005 Chula Vista General Plan • 2007 Urban Core Specific Plan • 3rd Avenue Parking Study • Chula Vista Pedestrian Master Plan (2010) • Chula Vista Bikeway Master Plan (2011) • F Street Promenade Study (2017) • Pedestrian Connectivity and Infrastructure Improvement Plan (2017) • Additional Capital Improvement Projects that been completed or are in progress Additionally, our team will examine case studies and parking programs from other jurisdictions through a best practices review. The review will help identify innovative recommendations that may be applicable within the Downtown Chula Vista/Third Avenue Village context. A complete list of relevant documents and studies will be finalized with input from City of Chula Vista staff, and other key stakeholders. The relevant document and best practices review will be summarized in a memo and ultimately incorporated into the Downtown Parking Management Study. A.2 Coordination with Third Avenue Village Association (TAVA) Chen Ryan Associates will solicit the formation of a representative delegation from TAVA to be a liaison during this study and to enrich us with their intimate knowledge of the area, assist with their identification of issues and be a sounding board for their ideas. The consultant will facilitate a productive and close working relationship with TAVA 299 ??City of Chula Vista Agreement No.: 180681 Consultant Name: Chen Ryan Associates Rev. 10/24/17 and expect to seek their involvement at the many various stages of the project schedule. Our proposed outreach efforts with TAVA are described in greater detail in Task E.2. A.3 Parking Facility Inventory Chen Ryan Associates will develop a detailed parking inventory database of the Downtown Parking District Study Area as well as for the areas within and one block surrounding the Parking District Study Area (Downtown area). Parking supply will be inventoried through a combination of methods, including review of previous work and data from the 2007 Downtown Parking Management Study, interpretation of aerial imagery, and in-field verification. The inventory information will be digitized for use in Geographic Information Systems (GIS) software, by block face for on-street parking and parking facility location for off-street parking. The following parking types, regulations and attributes will be gathered: On-Street Parking Supply: • Number of marked parking stalls by type (metered parking, free parking, disabled parking, commercial zone, passenger loading zone, etc.) • An estimate of unmarked on-street parking capacity based on the linear extents of where on-street parking is permitted • Parking configuration (parallel, diagonal or perpendicular) • Cost of usage • Parking time limit • Hours of enforcement • Locations of other parking restrictions Off-Street Parking Spaces: • Parking facility location (address) • Ingress and egress locations • Parking facility type (surface lot, above grade structure or below grade structure) • Total number of parking spaces within the facility • Number of ADA spaces within the facility • Cost of usage • Facility operator • Hours of operation • Identification of destinations with their own off-street parking supply Chen Ryan will produce a detailed and geographically-accurate parking facilities inventory data product which will facilitate obtaining meaningful findings from parking utilization data collection (which will be described in a Task A.7). A.4 Inventory of Transit Facilities, Parking Regulations and Outlying Parking Facilities Our team will obtain and review the latest public transportation datasets from Metropolitan Transit System (MTS), the region’s public transportation operator. These datasets will be used to inform the evaluation of transit services in Task B. As noted in Task A.3, parking regulations and destinations with their own private off-street parking facilities will be a part of that parking inventory package. A.5 Development and Administration of Parking Opinion Survey 300 ??City of Chula Vista Agreement No.: 180681 Consultant Name: Chen Ryan Associates Rev. 10/24/17 In association with City staff, Chen Ryan Associates will develop and administer surveys which will include questions specifically tailored to various Downtown area parking-user stakeholders, including: visitors, business owners (and groups such as TAVA), employees and residents. The survey questions will aim to identify each groups’ prevailing opinions of Downtown area parking issues, their own parking needs, potential parking management solutions, and greater transportation concerns. The method(s) of survey distribution and administration will be agreed to when the project commences and may include the possibility of intercept surveys and the physical production and mailing of surveys to desired response groups, electronic distribution to email lists of various stakeholder groups, and the promotion and hosting of the survey at an online location (Survey Monkey or an equivalent site). It is assumed that the City will both produce and mail the physical copies to the desired groups if physical copies of the survey (if that method of distribution is decided upon). Chen Ryan Associates conducted a similar survey for the Bayside Performance Center Parking Management Plan and garnered over 700 responses. This information was found to be invaluable when developing parking management solutions that worked for patrons of the facility. Chen Ryan Associates will summarize the findings of the obtained surveys and incorporate into this project’s report deliverables, where applicable. Meaningful findings will inform recommendations of the parking management plan, where applicable and feasible. A.6 Analyze Seasonal Competition for Public Parking Space; Recommend Solutions Chen Ryan Associates will analyze parking occupancy and parking turnover (both efforts described in greater detail in Task A.7), to determine a baseline understanding of parking competition or conflict between different parking user groups (visitors, commuters, or residents) over scarce supply. Generally, the different parking user groups will tend to exhibit their own temporal occupancy trends and have different typical duration of stays. These insights can often be uncovered when analyzing the collected data. Chen Ryan Associates will coordinate with private parking vendors (Ace Parking, ABM, LAZ parking, etc.) to gain understanding of monthly, seasonal or special event (e.g. Lemon Festival) variations. Parking vendors are able to use their day-to-day experience to provide valuable information for developing a data collection plan, including insights on when they experience the most demand, parking complaints and issues they commonly receive from customers, and trends and changes within the industry that could potentially affect parking demand and management. For on-street parking facilities, insight on seasonal variable can also be gained from reviewing monthly meter revenues. Effective solutions to manage seasonal demands will be proposed as a part of this project’s parking management recommendations in Task C. A.7 Analyze Parking Usage Patterns through Parking Occupancy and Turnover Collection Parking Occupancy Chen Ryan Associates will observe parking occupancy rates throughout the day for sampling of weekday and weekend within all of the inventoried parking facilities in the study area. Data collection will be conducted multiple times throughout the day on up to eight different days (5 weekdays and 3 weekend days) to provide a robust sampling from which to determine the peak periods. Chen Ryan Associates will work with TAVA and other key stakeholders to identify key dates that best represent the dynamics of parking demand within the Downtown area. The consultant recommends parking occupancy counts be conducted during the following shifts: • 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM –Morning parking demand 301 ??City of Chula Vista Agreement No.: 180681 Consultant Name: Chen Ryan Associates Rev. 10/24/17 • 11:00 AM to 1:00 PM –Lunchtime parking demand • 3:00 PM to 5:00 PM –Afternoon parking demand • 6:00 PM to 8:00 PM –Dinnertime parking demand • 9:00 PM to 11:00 PM –Evening parking demand Data collection for each sampling period will be captured on the same day across the entire study area. Parking occupancy data will be collected by block face for on-street parking and parking facility location for off-street parking and brought into GIS for analysis and display. While it is rational to collect and generalize parking occupancy conditions at a block by block level, there are limitations with using block faces as a unit for analysis. Block faces do not always signal the supply quantity within a block, nor do block face segments effectively represent the granular nature of how parking supply is distributed within a block. Chen Ryan Associates plans to utilize an innovative analysis approach that will compensate for those limitations. This proposed approach, uses network analysis techniques within GIS to generate estimated occupancy rates for parking supply within a specified distance of a destination (this can be a building or a parcel). A key benefit to this approach, which is a product of treating parking as a granular feature, rather than assuming even distribution along a block, is that those occupancy percentages can be converted to generate an empirical estimate of available parking supply from destinations. These estimates can also be tailored to time of day estimates, corresponding to the collection periods. This analysis still utilizes block faces as the units for data collection and occupancy calculation. The refinement to the approach is through relating the data to individual sites (parcels or buildings)within the study area within a specified distance. In this demonstration of proof of concept, occupancy along a block face does not always tell the same story as occupancy within a short walk. This approach is possible when all of the parking supply are coded into points and all traversable paths are coded into a network dataset within GIS. Parking occupancy for the Downtown area will be displayed for each sampling period on each data collection day. These maps will be supplemented with the aforementioned destination-level occupancy and supply availability analysis. This supplemental analysis can assess how parking trends vary by types of parking generating land uses, types of parking restriction, and densities. This analysis may also be used to evaluate how disproportionately-concentrated with sub- populations of interest within the Downtown area (seniors, historically-disadvantaged social groups, etc.) experience parking supply and availability. Parking Turnover Parking turnover data will be collected in locations to-be-identified, which have been observed to have extremely high parking occupancy. Parking turnover data measures the duration of a parking stay by parking spot. This information helps to determine whether parking management strategies, such as time limited parking, are warranted; or whether parking is being used efficiently (i.e. if the type of demand matches the supply provided) and whether the current parking enforcement techniques are adequate for maintaining legal parking turnover rates (i.e. if patrons are commonly abiding by the posted time limits). This information, along with temporal occupancy trends, can help pinpoint which user groups (employees, visitors, or residents –who may be in competition with each other) are disproportionately using certain parking facilities. The consultant recommends that parking turnover counts be collected as follows: • Data will be collected at up to four hot spot locations (based on analysis of the parking occupancy data) • Data will be collected hourly for a to-be-determined extended time period • Data will be collected for two (2) weekdays and two (2) weekend days • Data will be collected across all parking space types (metered, time limited, commercial, etc.) 302 ??City of Chula Vista Agreement No.: 180681 Consultant Name: Chen Ryan Associates Rev. 10/24/17 The Chen Ryan team will consider the most-effective technologies and methods to collect turnover, which will ensure the data will be gathered in an accurate and efficient manner. In past projects, Chen Ryan has utilized license plate- reading devices, drones equipped with cameras, mounted cameras, and manual collection to collect turnover. Chen Ryan Associates has successfully applied these collection methods for projects at the Port of San Diego, City of Encinitas, and San Diego communities of Bankers Hill and Hillcrest. A.8 Analyze Bicycle Parking and Bicycling Conditions Chen Ryan Associates’ involvement in the Chula Vista Active Transportation Plan (ATP) will ensure that the effort to deliver with the Downtown Parking Management Study will be supplemented with the most current and in-depth understanding of the City’s bicycling issues and conditions. Our team will procure detailed inventories of the bicycle facilities, amenities and parking locations, and also evaluate the overall comfort of bicycle travel the Downtown area. Our team will apply Bicycle Level of Traffic Stress (LTS) methodology to analyze bicycling conditions within the Downtown area. LTS, developed by Merkuria et. al. (2012) of the Mineta Transportation Institute, has become a widely-accepted and utilized bicycling performance measure around the transportation industry. LTS classifies the street network according to the estimated level of stress it causes cyclists, taking into consideration a cyclist’s physical separation from vehicular traffic, posted speed limits and number of travel lanes along a roadway, as well as factors related to intersection approaches with right-turn lanes and uncontrolled crossings. LTS scores range from 1 (lowest stress) to 4 (highest stress) and correspond to roadway conditions that different cycling demographics would find suitable for riding on the basis of stress tolerance. LTS scores are attributed to roadway links and may be used to model low-stress bicycling connectivity between sets of origins and destinations. The findings from our bicycling and transit conditions inventory will be analyzed and applied to best inform mode-shift- based parking management strategies. A.9 Analysis of Parking Enforcement Systems As noted in Task A.7, collection of parking occupancy and turnover helps to determine whether parking management strategies, such as time limited parking, are warranted; or whether parking is being used efficiently (i.e. if the type of demand matches the supply provided) and whether the current parking enforcement techniques are adequate for maintaining legal parking turnover rates (i.e. if patrons are commonly abiding by the posted time limits). Analysis of parking occupancy and parking turnover will help determine whether current enforcement systems, fees, and practices are adequate. A.10 Evaluation of In-Lieu Fee Program Fiscal Performance Chula Vista’s In-Lieu Parking Fee Program which allows developers planning to build projects in the Downtown area the choice to opt out of fulfilling their on-site parking requirements by paying a fee instead. With the walkable characteristics of the Downtown area and the presence of numerous large capacity parking facilities, this has enabled centralized, shared parking arrangements a possible development strategy, such as the 700-space public parking structure located one block from 3rd Avenue at Landis Avenue and F Street. Chen Ryan Associates will evaluate the fiscal performance of the current In-Lieu fee program to determine if the revenue from incoming payments from developers are meeting the debt obligations and operating costs of the parking facilities, to determine it the payment structure needs adjustment. The consultant will also develop a pro-forma under future year conditions to project if the in-lieu fee program, as it currently stands, will be able accommodate the projected growth in the area, including the potential development of some, or all public surface parking lots, while still maintaining a nexus and serving the areas parking needs. 303 ??City of Chula Vista Agreement No.: 180681 Consultant Name: Chen Ryan Associates Rev. 10/24/17 Review the Current Financial Performance of the Parking System in Downtown Chen Ryan Associates will review the inventory of publicly controlled parking facilities in the Downtown area, including on-street parking, surface lots, and parking garages. For each facility, Chen Ryan Associates will profile the following key parameters: • Locations, amounts, and type of parking • Utilization • Annual parking revenues and expenses • Economic return to City Using the parking inventory database, Chen Ryan Associates will determine which locations, facilities, and/or types of parking generate the highest gross revenues and highest net operating income (NOI) after operating and maintenance costs. Chen Ryan Associates will further identify key characteristics that contribute to high revenues and/or economic return. Chen Ryan Associates has performed similar studies for numerous parking facilities including the UCSD Medical Campus, La Mesa Village and America’s Cup Harbor. A.11 Analysis of Emerging Technology-Based Mobility Services The proliferation of technology-based mobility services, such as those provided by ride-hailing companies or dockless bike sharing services (which have recently entered into the Chula Vista market) have created additional mobility options for Downtown area visitors. Ride-hailing companies (such as Lyft or Uber) and other technology based mobility services can enable an additional large volume of visitors to enter a destination area above the fixed supply of automobile parking, an innovation which may enable cities to accelerate turning away from development-inhibiting parking requirements. Chen Ryan Associates will consider monitoring the presence of or the availability of these mobility services during existing conditions data collection and be mindful of how they (and other potential technological advancements in transportation) are integrated into the extrapolation of future conditions need and parking management recommendations. B -EVALUATION OF PARKING STRATEGIES B.1 Analysis Current and Future Parking Demand and Needs Building off of the analysis of current parking demand analysis completed in Task A, Chen Ryan Associates will model future parking demand based on the City’s near-term (10-year horizon) plans for growth in the Downtown area. Industry parking standards such as ULI Shared Parking Guidelines or the ITE Parking Manual will be used to determine future parking generation. Additionally, in order to account for linked trips that are usually associated with mixed-use area like Downtown Chula Vista (where it may be conducive to park once and walk to multiple destinations), Chen Ryan will determine the existing parking demand and associated them with parcel within reasonable walking distance of a parking demand. This approach would allow the project team to calibrate the existing parking demand and project them to the future year without overly projecting the parking demand for Downtown Chula Vista. The following factors will be considered in the construction of the future parking demand model: • Projected future changes parking supply within the study area • Planned land uses within the study area • Projected population and employment • Projected transit services A major benefit to the destination-based catchment approach to analyzing existing parking occupancy (introduced in Task A), is that it will allow for a more realistic modeling of how overflow parking demand growth will filter to surrounding areas. This does not get captured effectively when growth factors are uniformly applied to block faces. The future parking demand model will be used to identify potential future parking needs and impacted locations within the project study area. Additional long-term parking improvements and program recommendations will be made based on 304 ??City of Chula Vista Agreement No.: 180681 Consultant Name: Chen Ryan Associates Rev. 10/24/17 the anticipated future parking demand and supply, any future year impacts that are identified, and changes in potential revenue generated within the district based on the demand. B.2 Evaluation of Fiscal Performance of Parking District Chen Ryan Associates and EFS Engineering will evaluate the fiscal performance of paid parking facilities within the Parking District Study Area based on the current rate structures and the distribution of nearby free parking. Analysis will consider parking revenues at the facilities along with results from Task A. Based on this evaluation the consultant will recommend potential changes to the fee structure and/or areas that incorporate paid parking. Our team has performed numerous parking facility and parking district pro-formas throughout the region, including the recently-completed Downtown La Mesa In-Lieu Fee Program. B.3 Evaluation of Parking District Expansion within Study Area Chen Ryan Associates and EFS Engineering have worked together to develop, expand, maintain and establish a nexus for numerous special assessment districts throughout the region. Our team will apply this knowledge and experience, along with the results of Task A to determine the advantages and disadvantages of expanding the current parking district. B.4 Evaluation of Parking District-Related Impacts to Surrounding Residential Areas Chen Ryan Associates will review the parking occupancy analysis from Task A to determine if the presence of metered parking is causing parking spillover residential areas outside of the parking district, where parking is free and not time- restricted and make recommendations based on those findings. B.5 Evaluation of Current Parking Management Practices Chen Ryan Associates will review the parking occupancy and turnover results from the paid parking locations within the parking district to determine if current pricing for parking, validation arrangements with merchants and parking enforcement practices are ensuring an efficient utilization of parking the existing parking supply. Efficient utilization means that most of the parking is being utilized while ensuring that visitors can still find parking without detouring significantly (85% utilization per block is an often-considered rule of thumb for efficient utilization). Evaluation of parking turnover within the time-restricted parking locations will determine if parking time-restrictions are being properly enforced. B.6 Evaluation of Parking Management Technologies The application of state-of-the-art technologies in parking management will be considered as a part of a broader survey and evaluation of parking management solutions, of which that effort is described in Task B.12. B.7 Evaluation of Parking Information Signage and Parking Information Marketing Efforts Chen Ryan Associates will evaluate the effectiveness of the Downtown area’s existing parking information signage as well as any existing parking information campaigns. As a part of existing conditions data collection, our team will conduct an audit on the locations of existing parking information signage and assess the visibility and legibility of the signage. Findings from existing parking occupancy data analysis can also be utilized to help strategically influence new or adjusted wayfinding sign placements. Our team can also assist the City with helping develop a formalized wayfinding program to outline signage display and siting requirements. Sign format will emphasize legibility and a minimalistic approach resulting in a uniform display that is appealing, clear, and avoids unnecessary information. A wayfinding signage program could include a system design component, outlining placement standards and destinations served, as well as establishing a hierarchy process defining how far out to identify destinations.305 ??City of Chula Vista Agreement No.: 180681 Consultant Name: Chen Ryan Associates Rev. 10/24/17 B.8 Evaluation of Current Transit Services in the Downtown Area Chen Ryan Associates can utilize its familiarity with measures of public transportation access and mobility to assess how transit currently, and will in the future, serve the Downtown area of Chula Vista. Chen Ryan Associates is working with the City of San Diego, to determine which factors most closely explain lower household vehicle ownership rates in San Diego and in peer cities to help determine where to target locations for reducing residential parking requirements. Not surprisingly, public transportation indicators have had the most explanatory power relating to lower vehicle-ownership rates. There is a close relationship between the quantity of destinations that can accessed within a set travel time and lower rates of household vehicle ownership. Chen Ryan is fluent in a variety of methods to empirically measure the outputs of public transportation service. One type of evaluation of increasing interest to planning practitioners is the generation of isochrones, which measure the distance covered in a specified travel time/cost (mobility). Isochrone generation can measure the quantity and types of destinations (jobs, households, etc.) that can be accessed from an origin location within a specified travel time. The ability to compare mobility and access indicators across different travel modes is of foundational importance to being able to accurately estimate mode shift potential. B.9 Evaluation of Traffic Flow Implications Related to Parking Management Strategies During the data collection period, Chen Ryan Associates will note any observations in the field of unwanted or unintended traffic behaviors arising from motorists attempting to secure parking. Such behaviors might include motorists double-parking, circling the block for parking, motorists holding up traffic while waiting for an open parking space, as well as any other notable unwanted traffic maneuvers. B.10 Evaluation of Zoning Ordinance Parking Standards Chen Ryan Associates will review the City of Chula Vista’s Zoning Ordinance to assess if the City’s parking minimums can functionally be configured in a manner that does not inhibit infill development or require lot assembly, given the typical lot sizes and setback requirements of the area. Chen Ryan Associates will also review the Zoning Ordinance to determine if the parking requirements and design standards are keeping up with the best practices identified by other municipalities looking to transition to denser, less automobile dependent built environments. Along those lines, Chen Ryan Associates is, as was mentioned previously, assisting the City of San Diego with adjusting their parking requirements within the city’s Transit Priority Areas. B.11 Review Current Parking Facility Agreements EFS Engineering will review the current parking agreement between the City, Centre City Associates Limited-Commercial and Marie Callender Ventures, and, if necessary, make recommendations for adjustments or modifications. B.12 Evaluation of Parking Management Strategies and Technologies Applied in Comparable Districts Chen Ryan Associates will develop a parking management toolbox, which will evaluate the effectiveness of various parking management strategies, including any state-of-the-art technologies, and their rate suitability to Downtown Chula Vista. Strategies which have been applied effectively in similarly-sized and built central business districts will be given up-close attention. The toolbox will provide a description of the strategy, the typical costs of implementation and maintenance, and the benefits and the most proper applications. A few examples of parking management strategies are listed below: • Smart Meters with Real-Time On-Street Variable Pricing Systems • Remote Payment Options (e.g. Pay-by-phone)306 ??City of Chula Vista Agreement No.: 180681 Consultant Name: Chen Ryan Associates Rev. 10/24/17 • Real-Time Information on Parking Supply/Parking Supply Wayfinding • License Plate Reader Technologies and Other Smart Parking Enforcement Detectors • Shared/Unbundled Parking Incentives B.13 Evaluation of Bike Sharing Services as a Supplemental Parking Management Strategy Inexpensive dockless bike sharing services provide an equity supportive mobility option by eliminating potential users’ concerns over the financial commitment of bicycle ownership, maintenance and secure storage. When combined with suitable bicycling environments (as measured by LTS), it can potentially facilitate mode shifts for visitors originating from shorter travel distances away –distances where bicycling may be competitive with driving. Easy and convenient bicycling can also minimize the inconvenience of searching for parking or parking in remote locations. Chen Ryan Associates will evaluate the impacts this emerging mobility service has had in the Downtown area. Chen Ryan will also consider monitoring the presence of or the availability of shared bicycles during existing conditions data collection and be mindful of how they are integrated into the extrapolation of future conditions need. C -RECOMMENDATIONS C.1 Parking Management Recommendations Chen Ryan Associates will form a set of parking management recommendations synthesized from the findings of various scope of work tasks previously described. Those tasks consider: • the observed spatial and temporal patterns of parking usage within the study area (Task A.7) • the effectiveness of current enforcement systems (Tasks A.7, A.9 and B.4) • current parking management practices (Task B.5) and potential new practices and technologies (Task B.6 and B.12) • the economic feasibility of increasing the parking supply (Task B.2) • the potential of other modes of transportation and emerging mobility services (Tasks A.8, A.11, B.8, and B.13) C.2 Parking Facility Agreement Recommendations The consultant, led by the expertise of EFS Engineering, will recommend modifications, as-needed, to the parking agreements the City of Chula Vista has in place with third parties, and recommend any new agreements that are needed with other uses in the study area. C.3 Urban Core and Citywide Zoning Ordinance Parking Standards Recommendations Upon evaluation of the City’s Zoning Ordinance parking standards, completed in Task B.10, project team will recommend modifications, if any are needed. C.4 Transit Service Recommendations Chen Ryan Associates will identify recommendations to enhance transit service(s) within the Downtown area. C.5 Wayfinding Recommendations Chen Ryan Associates will identify recommendations to enhance wayfinding within the Downtown area to better serve the needs of alternative modes of transportation and to increase the efficient utilization of the District’s existing parking supply. 307 ??City of Chula Vista Agreement No.: 180681 Consultant Name: Chen Ryan Associates Rev. 10/24/17 C.6 Special Event Parking Recommendations Chen Ryan Associates will identify parking recommendations to assist the City during special event peaks (e.g. Lemon Festival and Starlight Parade), which are hosted inside the Downtown Parking District and may have traffic and parking impacts. C.7 Recommendations to Reduce Parking Spillover Impacts In accordance with the findings in Task B.4, Chen Ryan Associates will ensure recommended future parking strategies are balanced with measures which prevent parking spillover impacts in residential areas adjacent to the Downtown Parking District. C.8 Technological-Based Parking Management Recommendations Chen Ryan Associates will make recommendations on new parking management technologies, pursuant to the evaluations of parking management strategies completed in Tasks B.6 and B.12. C.9 Bike Sharing Service Recommendations The project team will continue to monitor the spread of dockless bike sharing services to new markets and make recommendations which allow the services to flourish while ensuring controls where appropriate. D -DELIVERABLES D.1 Preliminary Report Summarizing Existing Parking Conditions within the Downtown Area After the completion of all Tasks in A and B, Chen Ryan Associates will summarize and document all of the findings in a Preliminary Report. The report will include, but not be limited to, the following: • A spatial and temporal analysis and evaluation of parking occupancy; • An evaluation of current parking management and enforcement practices; • A detailed investigation of effective parking management strategies and technologies that have been put into practice; • An assessment of the potential utility of mobility services and other transportation modes; • An evaluation of the current In-Lieu Fee program; • An evaluation of the current financial performance of the Downtown parking system; and • Recommendations informed by the findings in all of the tasks performed in A and B. D.2 Downtown Parking Management Study Chen Ryan Associates will prepare the Downtown Parking Management Study, which synthesizes the Scope of Work Sections A through C, with an implementation plan containing cost estimates and phasing. The report will be provided in Microsoft Word and PDF format. D.3 PowerPoint Presentations for Preliminary Report and Parking Management Study Chen Ryan Associates will prepare two PowerPoint presentations, one which will summarize the analysis and key findings of the Preliminary Report, and a second presentation which will summarize the findings and recommendations of the completed Parking Management Study. E -MEETINGS AND PRESENTATIONS E.1 Project Kick-Off Meeting 308 ??City of Chula Vista Agreement No.: 180681 Consultant Name: Chen Ryan Associates Rev. 10/24/17 Upon notice to proceed, Chen Ryan Associates will schedule a kick-off meeting with Chula Vista staff slated to be involved with the project to present and solidify the outline of proposal for the study. E.2 Five Stakeholder Meetings with City staff and TAVA Five focus group-style stakeholder interviews will be conducted, spread across the duration of the project schedule, consisting of City staff and a representative group of participants assembled from TAVA. TAVA is a diverse association of businesses and property owners clustered around Third Avenue in Downtown Chula Vista. Qualitative stakeholder input is one of the most effective ways for the project team to quickly assess community perspectives on current (and anticipated future) parking issues, opportunities, and challenges. One stakeholder focus group will occur shortly after project kickoff, which will solicit the input of the association of the current and expected future parking needs. One meeting to allow the group an opportunity to provide its input on the recommendations of the parking management study. One meeting to allow the group an opportunity to provide its input on the first draft of the study. The other focus group meetings will be sprinkled between, during the course of the project’s schedule to allow the group to be in touch with the progress and direction of the project. Chen Ryan Associates employed this same technique with the Encinitas Coastal Mobility Parking study and found that it helpful in shepherding innovative solutions through the planning process. The input collected during the stakeholder interviews will be documented and incorporated into this project’s report deliverables, where applicable. E.3 Obtain Input from TAVA on Initial Recommendations As stated in Task E.2, one of the minimum five proposed meetings with TAVA will be for the purposes of obtaining their input on the study’s initial recommendations. E.4 Formal Presentation of Preliminary Report to Chula Vista City Council Chen Ryan Associates will appear at one Chula Vista City Council meeting to present the key findings of the Preliminary Report to the Council. E.5 Presentation of Downtown Parking Management Study First Draft to City Staff and Stakeholder Working Group As stated in Task E.2, one of the minimum five proposed meetings with TAVA will be for the purposes of obtaining their input on the first draft of the study. E.6 Formal Presentation of Downtown Parking Management Study to Chula Vista City Council for Council Approval Chen Ryan Associates will appear at a second Chula Vista City Council meeting to formally present the Downtown Parking Management Study to the Council, for their vote for approval. 309 ??City of Chula Vista Agreement No.: 180681 Consultant Name: Chen Ryan Associates Rev. 10/24/17 PROJECT BUDGET 310 ??City of Chula Vista Agreement No.: 180681 Consultant Name: Chen Ryan Associates Rev. 10/24/17 PROJECT SCHEDULE 3.Term:In accordance with Section 1.10 of this Agreement, the term of this Agreement shall begin August 14, 2018 and end on August 31, 2019 for completion of all Required Services. 4. Compensation: A.Form of Compensation 311 ??City of Chula Vista Agreement No.: 180681 Consultant Name: Chen Ryan Associates Rev. 10/24/17 ⾙Fixed Fee Paid in Increments. For the completion of each Deliverable of the Required Services,as identified in section 2.B., above, City shall pay the fixed fee associated with each Deliverable, in the amounts set forth below: Task No.Deliverable Amount A.1-A.11/E.1-E.3/D.1 Preliminary Report $46,000 B.1-B.13/C.1-C.9/E.2/D.2 Draft Downtown Parking Management Study $50,000 D.2-D.3/E.4,E.6 Final Downtown Parking Management Study/Council Hearing $35,695 B.Reimbursement of Costs ⾙ None, the compensation includes all costs Notwithstanding the foregoing, the maximum amount to be paid to the Consultant for services performed through August 31, 2019 shall not exceed $131,695. 5.Special Provisions: . ⾙ Permitted Sub-Consultants: EFS Engineering Inc. ☐Security for Performance: None ⾙ Notwithstanding the completion date set forth in Section 3 above, City has option to extend this Agreement for an additional three-month term from September 1, 2019 through November 30, 2019 (the “Extended Term”) to complete services that are similar in scope and character to the Required Services and in furtherance of the Downtown Parking Management Study (“Extended Term Services”). The City Manager or Director of Finance/Treasurer shall be authorized to exercise the Extended Term on behalf of the City. If the City exercises the option to extend, Consultant shall provide the Extended Term Services during the Extended Term on the same terms and conditions contained in this Agreement. The City shall give written notice to Consultant of the City’s election to exercise the extension via the Notice of Exercise of Option to Extend document. For the performance of the Extended Term Services by Consultant, City shall pay Consultant for the productive hours of time spent by Consultant in the performance of the Extended Term Services at the rates or amounts as indicated in the Project Budget table found in Exhibit A, Section 2(B)hereto. The maximum amount to be paid to the Consultant for all Extended Term Services performed during the Extended Term shall not exceed $19,754.00. The maximum amount to be paid to the Consultant for all services performed during the Term and Extended Term shall not exceed $151,449.00. 312 ??City of Chula Vista Agreement No.: 180681 Consultant Name: Chen Ryan Associates Rev. 10/24/17 EXHIBIT B INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS Consultant shall adhere to all terms and conditions of Section 3 of the Agreement and agrees to provide the following types and minimum amounts of insurance, as indicated by checking the applicable boxes (x). Type of Insurance Minimum Amount Form ⾙ General Liability: Including products and completed operations, personal and advertising injury $2,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury (including death), and property damage. If Commercial General Liability insurance with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit must apply separately to this Agreement or the general aggregate limit must be twice the required occurrence limit Additional Insured Endorsement or Blanket AI Endorsement for City* Waiver of Recovery Endorsement Insurance Services Office Form CG 00 01 *Must be primary and must not exclude Products/Completed Operations ⾙ Automobile Liability $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury, including death, and property damage Insurance Services Office Form CA 00 01 Code 1-Any Auto Code 8-Hired Code 9-Non Owned ⾙ Workers’ Compensation Employer’s Liability $1,000,000 each accident $1,000,000 disease policy limit $1,000,000 disease each employee Waiver of Recovery Endorsement ⾙ Professional Liability (Errors & Omissions) $1,000,000 each occurrence $2,000,000 aggregate Other Negotiated Insurance Terms: “NONE” 313 ??City of Chula Vista Agreement No.: 180681 Consultant Name: Chen Ryan Associates Rev. 10/24/17 EXHIBIT C CONSULTANT CONFLICT OF INTEREST DESIGNATION The Political Reform Act1 and the Chula Vista Conflict of Interest Code2 (“Code”) require designated state and local government officials, including some consultants, to make certain public disclosures using a Statement of Economic Interests form (Form 700).Once filed, a Form 700 is a public document, accessible to any member of the public. In addition, consultants designated to file the Form 700 are also required to comply with certain ethics training requirements.3 ⾙ A. Consultant IS a corporation or limited liability company and is therefore EXCLUDED4 from disclosure. ☐B. Consultant NOT a corporation or limited liability company and disclosure designation is as follows: APPLICABLE DESIGNATIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL(S) ASSIGNED TO PROVIDE SERVICES (Category descriptions available at www.chulavistaca.gov/departments/city-clerk/conflict-of-interest-code.) Name Email Address Applicable Designation Enter Name of Each Individual Who Will Be Providing Service Under the Contract –If individuals have different disclosure requirements, duplicate this row and complete separately for each individual Enter email address(es)☐A. Full Disclosure ☐B. Limited Disclosure (select one or more of the categories under which the consultant shall file): ☐1. ☐2. ☐3. ☐4. ☐5. ☐6. ☐7. Justification: ☐C. Excluded from Disclosure 1.Required Filers Each individual who will be performing services for the City pursuant to the Agreement and who meets the definition of “Consultant,” pursuant to FPPC Regulation 18700.3, must file a Form 700. 2.Required Filing Deadlines Each initial Form 700 required under this Agreement shall be filed with the Office of the City Clerk via the City's online filing system, NetFile, within 30 days of the approval of the Agreement. Additional Form 700 filings will be required annually on April 1 during the term of the Agreement, and within 30 days of the termination of the Agreement. 1 Cal. Gov. Code §§81000 et seq.; FPPC Regs. 18700.3 and 18704. 2 Chula Vista Municipal Code §§2.02.010-2.02.040. 3 Cal. Gov. Code §§53234, et seq. 4 CA FPPC Adv. A-15-147 (Chadwick) (2015); Davis v. Fresno Unified School District (2015) 237 Cal.App.4th 261; FPPC Reg. 18700.3 (Consultant defined as an “individual” who participates in making a governmental decision; “individual” does not include corporation or limited liability company).314 ??City of Chula Vista Agreement No.: 180681 Consultant Name: Chen Ryan Associates Rev. 10/24/17 3. Filing Designation The City Department Director will designate each individual who will be providing services to the City pursuant to the Agreement as full disclosure, limited disclosure, or excluded from disclosure, based on an analysis of the services the Consultant will provide. Notwithstanding this designation or anything in the Agreement, the Consultant is ultimately responsible for complying with FPPC regulations and filing requirements. If you have any questions regarding filing requirements, please do not hesitate to contact the City Clerk at (619)691-5041, or the FPPC at 1- 866-ASK-FPPC, or (866) 275-3772 *2. Pursuant to the duly adopted City of Chula Vista Conflict of Interest Code, this document shall serve as the written determination of the consultant’s requirement to comply with the disclosure requirements set forth in the Code. Completed by: Kelly Broughton, Director 315 P a g e | 1 August 14, 2018 File ID: 18-0345 TITLE RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA TRANSFERRING $450,000 IN MEASURE P APPROPRIATIONS FROM THE DRN0211, STORM DRAIN (CMP) REHABILITATION OUTSIDE THE RIGHT OF WAY (PHASE II) PROJECT TO DRN0209, STORM DRAIN (CMP) REHABILITATION OUTSIDE THE RIGHT OF WAY (PHASE I) PROJECT FOR CONTRACT CHANGE ORDERS AND ADDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT COSTS (4/5 VOTE REQUIRED) RECOMMENDED ACTION Council adopt the resolution. SUMMARY On December 12, 2017, the Purchasing Agent approved a construction contract with Southwest Pipeline & Trenchless Corporation for the Storm Drain (CMP) Rehabilitation Outside the Right of Way Phase I Project, CIP#DRN209, funded by Measure P. Due to differing site conditions including the deteriorated condition of the existing pipe segments, and access constraints, many storm drain segments required extensive repairs and in some cases replacement, resulting in extensions to the construction contract duration and cost increases to the project exceeding the approved contingencies. The proposed action would appropriate an additional $450,000 above the amount originally approved, for construction change orders with Southwest Pipeline & Trenchless Corporation and additional construction management costs with Project Professionals Corporation. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Director of Development Services has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the project qualifies for Class 1 Categorical Exemptions pursuant to Section 15301, Class 1 (b) (Existing Facilities) of the CEQA State Guidelines. Consistent with Section 15301(b), the proposed action would not result in a significant effect on the environment, create a cumulative impact, damage a scenic highway, be located on a site pursuant to Section 65962.5, or cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. The project involves no expansion of an existing use. Thus, no further environmental review is necessary. BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION Not Applicable. 316 P a g e | 2 DISCUSSION The corrugated metal pipe (CMP) in the City’s storm drain system is almost 50 years old and has reached the end of its service life and is in need of rehabilitation. Measure P Project DRN0209 will rehabilitate the storm drain piping outside the right of way that is considered in critical need of rehabilitation as identified by the drainage asset management program. A cured in place pipe (CIPP) lining system will rehabilitate the CMP pipes to prevent failure and potential flooding and property damage. During construction, differing site conditions were encountered. After flushing out the inside of the pipes to remove sand, rocks, and other materials, the condition of many pipe segments was more deteriorated than anticipated. These pipe segments require extensive repair work, and in some cases replacement, prior to CIPP lining. In addition, access to the storm drain easements, which are outside the public right of way, is through resident yards and requires additional coordination and construction work to complete the repairs. The differing site conditions and access constraints resulted in construction change orders and extended the construction contract duration, beyond what was contemplated in the construction contract. On May 9, 2017, City Council approved Resolution 17-0174 to adopt ordinance (Ord. 3400 § 1, 2017) of the City of Chula Vista and amend Chapter 2.56 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code – “Purchasing System”. This ordinance amended the change order limits and authorizes the City Engineer to approve change orders up to the remaining CIP budget available for the CIP project. Approval of the proposed resolution would increase the CIP budget for DRN0209 by $450,000 and thereby increase the City Engineer’s change order approval authority to the increased CIP budget amount. DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT Staff has reviewed the decision contemplated by this action and determined the decision concerns repairs, replacement or maintenance of existing streets, water, sewer, storm drainage or similar facilities, per California Code of Regulations Title 2, section 18702.2(c)(1), and consequently the 500-foot rule found in California Code of Regulations Title 2, section 18702.2(a)(11) is not applicable to this decision for purposes of determining a disqualifying real property-related financial conflict of interest under the Political Reform Act (Cal. Gov't Code § 87100, et seq.). Staff is not independently aware, and has not been informed by any City Council member, of any other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter. LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS The City’s Strategic Plan has five major goals: Operational Excellence, Economic Vitality, Healthy Community, Strong and Secure Neighborhoods, and a Connected Community. The Storm Drain (CMP) Rehabilitation Outside the Right of Way Phase Iproject supports the Strong andSecure Neighborhoods goal by restoring the storm drain infrastructure system through the drainage asset management program. CURRENT-YEAR FISCAL IMPACT Approval of the resolution will transfer $450,000 from DRN0211 to DRN0209 to complete Phase I of the CMP Rehabilitation project. Sufficient Measure P funds are available in DRN0211 for said transfer; therefore there is no additional impact to the Measure P fund. 317 P a g e | 3 ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT Upon completion of the project, the improvements will require routine maintenance. ATTACHMENTS None. Staff Contact: Nicola Kavanagh, Principal Civil Engineer 318 RESOLUTION NO. __________ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA TRANSFERRING $450,000 IN MEASURE P APPROPRIATIONS FROM THE DRN0211, STORM DRAIN (CMP) REHABILITATION OUTSIDE THE RIGHT OF WAY (PHASE II) PROJECT TO DRN0209, STORM DRAIN (CMP) REHABILITATION OUTSIDE THE RIGHT OF WAY (PHASE I) PROJECT FOR CONTRACT CHANGE ORDERS AND ADDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT COSTS (4/5 VOTE REQUIRED) WHEREAS, on December 12, 2017, the Purchasing Agent approved a construction contract with Southwest Pipeline & Trenchless Corporation for the Storm Drain (CMP) Rehabilitation Outside the Right of Way Phase I Project, CIP #DRN0209, funded by Measure P; and WHEREAS, due to differing site conditions including the deteriorated condition of the existing pipe segments, and access constraints, many storm drain segments required extensive repairs and in some cases replacement, resulting in an extended construction contract duration and increased costs to the project exceeding the approved contingencies; and WHEREAS, as a result of these changes the construction contractor submitted proposed change orders to the City for the increased costs; and WHEREAS, as a result of the extended construction contract duration, the construction management consultant, Project Professionals Corporation, will incur increased construction management costs; and WHEREAS, the work is in progress and the additional funds are required to complete the project and prevent failure of the storm drain pipes, which would necessitate significantly more costly repairs; and WHEREAS, approval of this resolution would increase the budget for CIP #DRN0209 by $450,000; and WHEREAS, in accordance with City Ordinance No. 3400, approval of this resolution would also increase the City Engineer’s change order approval authority to the increased budget amount for CIP #DRN0209. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista approves the transfer $450,000 in Measure P appropriations from DRN0211, Storm Drain (CMP) Rehabilitation Outside the Right of Way (Phase II) Project to DRN0209, Storm Drain (CMP) Rehabilitation Outside the Right of Way (Phase I) Project for construction contract change orders and additional construction management costs. 319 Presented by Approved as to form by William S. Valle Glen R. Googins Director of Engineering & Capital Projects City Attorney 320 P a g e | 1 August 14, 2018 File ID: 18-0000 TITLE RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH MADAFFER ENTERPRISES, INC. A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, FOR PHASE II IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SMART CITY STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN RECOMMENDED ACTION Council adopt the resolution. SUMMARY In September 2017, the City Council adopted the Smart City Strategic Action Plan, which serves as a roadmap and outlines the goals, objectives and initiatives that will help the City achieve its smart city vision. As a smart city, Chula Vista leverages innovative technology and data tools to better serve and engage citizens, enhance sustainability, improve public safety and promote local economic development. In April 2018, the city entered into a short term professional services agreement with Madaffer Enterprises, Inc. to provide implementation and refinement for Phase I of the Smart City Strategic Action Plan through marketing and outreach. The professional services agreement for Phase I concluded on June 30, 2018. Staff recommends entering into a new professional services agreement with Madaffer Enterprises, Inc., to ensure continued Phase II implementation of the Smart City Strategic Action Plan during fiscal year 2019. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Director of Development Services has reviewed the proposed activity for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines because it will not result in a physical change in the environment; therefore, pursuant to Section 15060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the activity is not subject to CEQA. In addition, notwithstanding the foregoing, the Director of Development Services has also determined that the “Project” qualifies for an Exemption pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines. Thus, no environmental review is required. BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION Not applicable. 321 P a g e | 2 DISCUSSION In September 2017, the City Council adopted the Smart City Strategic Action Plan, which serves as a roadmap and outlines the goals, objectives and initiatives that will help the City achieve its smart city vision. As a smart city, Chula Vista leverages innovative technology and data tools to better serve and engage citizens, enhance sustainability, improve public safety and promote local economic development. In April 2018, the city entered into a short term professional services agreement during fiscal year 20158 with Madaffer Enterprises, Inc. to provide implementation and refinement for Phase I of the Smart City Strategic Action Plan through marketing and outreach. The professional services agreement for Phase I concluded on June 30, 2018. During the term of the contract with Madaffer Enterprises, Inc., the following tasks were completed: 1) Development of Smart City website content; 2) Creation of social media content to market and promote Smart City projects, efforts and progress through Facebook, Twitter and Instagram; 3) Marketing and outreach of opportunities for testing and deploying unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) and autonomous vehicle technology, resulting from designation and inclusion by the Federal Aviation Administration in the Integration Pilot Program and the U.S. Department of Transportation in the Autonomous Vehicle Proving Grounds Programs. 4) Development of a Request for Expressions of Interest (RFEI) to solicit businesses and agencies in developing partnerships to implement strategies and initiatives for UAV and AV testing and deployment. Staff recommends entering into a new professional services agreement with Madaffer Enterprises, Inc., to ensure continued Phase II implementation of the Smart City Strategic Action Plan during fiscal year 2019. Phase II tasks will accomplish the following: 1) Internal Engagement—briefings and trainings on Smart City initiatives for staff and elected officials; 2) Business Engagement—assisting in business expansion, attraction and retention efforts to create jobs and support economic development within UAS and AV industries; 3) UAS and AV RFEI Support—support the review and analysis of responses to the RFEI on UAS and AV programs; 4) Marketing and Communications Support—continued marketing and outreach support through development of website and social media content. Staff is recommending approval of the professional services agreement with Madaffer Enterprises, Inc. as a sole source service provider pursuant to Chula Vista Municipal Code Sections 2.56.110 and 2.56.070.B4. The Purchasing Agent, after consultation with the Director of Economic Development has determined that the competitive bidding requirements are impractical given Madaffer Enterprises, Inc. unique knowledge 322 P a g e | 3 and expertise in drafting, refining and Phase I implementation of the Smart City Strategic Action Plan. The term of the agreement with Madaffer Enterprises, Inc. for Phase II Smart City implementation is one year at a cost not to exceed $7,500 per month. DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT Staff has reviewed the decision contemplated by this action and has determined that it is not site-specific and consequently, the 500-foot rule found in California Code of Regulations Title 2, section 18702.2(a)(11) is not applicable to this decision for purposes of determine a disqualifying real property-related financial conflict of interest under the Political Reform Act (Cal. Gov’t Code §87100, et seq.). Staff is not independently aware, and has not been informed by any council member, of any other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter. LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS The City’s Strategic Plan has five major goals: Operational Excellence, Economic Vitality, Healthy Community, Strong and Secure Neighborhoods and a Connected Community. Phase II implementation of the Smart City Strategic Action Plan positively affects all five strategic goals in that all departments and our citizens rely on innovative technology and data tools to better serve and engage, enhance sustainability, improve public safety and promote local economic development. CURRENT-YEAR FISCAL IMPACT There will be no impact to the General Fund for this project given that funds have been allocated in the fiscal year 2019 budget for Phase II implementation of the Smart City Strategic Action Plan. The total cost of the contract is $90,000. ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT Costs for Phase II implementation are not anticipated beyond fiscal year 2019. All funds to support Phase II implementation have been budgeted and therefore ongoing fiscal impact is not anticipated. ATTACHMENTS 1. Agreement with Madaffer Enterprises, Inc. Staff Contact: Kevin Pointer, Senior Economic Development Specialist 323 C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@F8341AC9\@BCL@F8341AC9.doc RESOLUTION NO. __________ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH MADAFFER ENTERPRISES, INC. A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, FOR PHASE II IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SMART CITY STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN WHEREAS, in September 2017, the City Council adopted the Smart City Strategic Action Plan (“SCSAP”); and WHEREAS, in April 2018 the City entered into a two-party professional services agreement with Madaffer Enterprises, Inc. (“Madaffer”) to provide Phase I refinement and implementation of the SCSAP through marketing and outreach; and WHEREAS, the term of the agreement with Madaffer concluded on June 30, 2018, and; WHEREAS, the City desires to enter into a subsequent two-party agreement with Madaffer to provide Phase II implementation of the SCSAP; and WHEREAS, Staff is recommending approval of the professional services agreement with Madaffer, as a sole source service provider pursuant to Chula Vista Municipal Code Sections 2.56.110 and 2.56.070.B4; and WHEREAS, the Purchasing Agent, after consultation with the Director of Economic Development, has determined that the competitive bidding requirements are impractical given Madaffer’s unique knowledge and expertise in drafting, refining, and implementing the Phase I SCSAP. 324 Resolution No. Page 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, that it approves the professional services agreement, between the City and Madaffer Enterprises, Inc., for Phase II implementation of the Smart City Strategic Action Plan, in the form presented, with such minor modifications as may be required or approved by the City Attorney, a copy of which shall be kept on file in the Office of the City Clerk, and authorizes and directs the City Manager to execute same.” Presented by Eric Crockett Economic Development Director Approved as to form by Glen R. Googins City Attorney 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 P a g e | 1 August 14, 2018 File ID: 18-0361 TITLE RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ADOPTING AN ADDENDUM TO THE CHULA VISTA FIRE FACILITY, EQUIPMENT, AND DEPLOYMENT MASTER PLAN RECOMMENDED ACTION Council adopt the resolution. SUMMARY On January 28, 2014, Chula Vista City Council approved and adopted Resolution Number 2014-018, adopting the Chula Vista Fire Department Fire Facility, Equipment, and Deployment Master Plan (Plan). Since then, portions of the Plan have become outdated for several reasons. There is a need to re-locate Fire Station 9, and address the outstanding issue of retaining the station for the long term. As part of the Fire Department response capability, there is also a need to address response time threshold issues which call for the addition of a Strategic, Quick-Unit Apparatus Delivery (SQUAD) and 4.0 staffing. Lastly, the current apparatus and equipment retention plan is obsolete requiring the establishment of a modern replacement policy to the Plan. The addendum will update the Plan so that it can be used as a source for future Fire Department improvements up to and including buildout of development. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Director of Development Services has reviewed the proposed activity for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the activity (addendum to the Fire Facilities Master Plan) falls under a Statutory Exemption pursuant to Section 15262 (Feasibility and Planning Studies) of the State CEQA Guidelines because the action is only amends a portion of the adopted Plan and does not include approval of any of facilities discussed in the Plan. The Plan does not include site specific descriptions for new stations. In the future when the fire facility project(s) are further defined additional environmental review will be completed prior to commencing any of the projects. BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION Not applicable DISCUSSION The addendum to the Plan provides necessary changes that bring the plan up to date to reflect current and future changes. The addendum updates or addresses four items within the Plan. Each item is briefly discussed below. 341 P a g e | 2 Item 1: Implementation of Strategic, Quick-Unit Apparatus Delivery (SQUAD) Fire Department response thresholds require the arrival of the first unit on scene to a fire or medical emergency within seven minutes, 90% of the time. To achieve these response times, the Fire Department has included in the modification to the Plan, the deployment of the SQUAD. Fire Department on scene arrival is a function of three considerations; distribution, concentration, and resource availability/reliability. Distribution is the geography of emergency resources and the travel time to emergencies to initiate stabilization of the emergency. Concentration is the ability to assemble multiple units at one emergency within the adopted time to transition from stabilization of the emergency to mitigation of the emergency. Resource Availability/Reliability is the degree to which the resources are ready and available to respond. In Chula Vista, distribution of resources has proven to be an issue affecting the Fire Department’s ability to arrive on scene within 7 minutes 90% of the time. The primary performance measure that drives the distribution/location for fire stations is travel time. The distribution of fire stations is a primary factor in the ability to meet response times. As mentioned earlier, distribution is the geography or placement of emergency response resources and their travel time to emergencies to initiate stabilization at the scene. Adequate distribution will allow for acceptable response time travel. Distribution of resources creates challenges on the east side of the City. Station locations are spread out further from one another and do not provide overlap of coverage that is seen on the west side of the City. In addition, the street network in the east does not provide an even spaced grid of street networks as it does in the west. An improvement to the distribution of resources is necessary to meet the 90% response time standard. The probability of any given unit’s availability (or unavailability) is one indicator of the Fire Department’s response reliability. Response reliability is defined as the probability that the required number of competently prepared staff and properly equipped apparatus will be available when a fire or emergency call is received. As the number of emergency calls per day increases, the probability that a needed piece of apparatus will be busy when a call is received also increases. Consequently, if the right amount of redundancy is not built into the system to ensure timely and adequate response to emergency calls can be maintained, the Department’s response reliability decreases. To measure response reliability, all types of calls for service must be considered. Today, EMS calls have an impact on the availability of Fire Department resources and are considered in the overall evaluation of Department reliability. Response reliability can be determined from historical run data and is typically expressed as a per/company statistic as well as an agency-wide statistic. Over the last 5 years, Department run data shows a 31% increase in call volume. In order to achieve the response threshold, it is necessary to identify opportunities to create a greater degree of overlap of the response districts within the distribution network in the east which will also improve reliability/availability. One way to achieve this is to build more fire stations and staff them with resources. Another way is to add less expensive SQUADs to the distribution of resources. The SQUADs will serve areas of the City with high call volume, or areas that are vacated due to another unit going out of district for fuel, mechanical repairs, or training. The SQUADs will also supplement areas of the City known to have poor response times as indicated by data already collected by the Fire Department. SQUADs will provide additional units to the response network thereby bolstering the distribution of resources. Providing better distribution through implementation of SQUADs allows for the improvement of availability/reliability discussed earlier. With increased distribution of response units and the 342 P a g e | 3 improvement to units being available to respond, response times will trend downwards towards the goal of 7 minutes 90% of the time. Item 2: Implementation of 4.0 Staffing As discussed earlier in this report, reliability and availability are two key factors that affect operational performance. The transition to 4.0 staffing on E51 was the first step towards increased staffing of engine companies in the Fire Department. Since implementing 4.0 staffing, Engine 51 has improved system reliability through increasing by more than nearly 107 hours, its availability to receive calls. As a result of improvements to Engine 51’s reliability and availability, it could accept emergency calls more often, thereby reducing response times that otherwise would have required a further unit to respond. Implementation of 4.0 staffing will continue with funding from Measure A, and has been separated into short and long term staffing plans. This approach will allow SQUAD implementation and 4.0 staffing to begin in areas believed to be critical in terms of call volume loads and maximum impact and benefit to the network of resources. Short term 4.0 staffing areas include: Engine 52 located at 80 East J. Street, Engine 55 currently located at 391 Oxford Street, Engine 57 located at 1640 Santa Venetia, Engine 60 at Millenia, and future Engine 61 at the Bayfront. Long term operational staffing costs may be funded using additional Measure A revenues that surpass current projections, followed by other general fund dollars which will be considered as part of the annual budget process. Long term staffing includes implementation of 4.0 staffing at Engine 53 located at 1410 Brandywine, Engine 54 located at 850 Paseo Ranchero, Engine 56 located at 805 San Miguel Road, and Engine 58 located at 1180 Woods Drive. The long term plan will also see the implementation and addition of a 4.0 staffed engine (Engine 59) which will complete the full and necessary compliment of one engine located in each fire station district throughout the City. The City currently runs one engine short at Fire Station 3. The addition of a 4.0 staffed truck (Truck 50) at the Bayfront fire station, a 4.0 staffed truck at Fire Station 4 (Truck 54), and a 4.0 staffed engine at the Village 8 fire station is also part of the long term staffing plan and indicated in the current Fire Facility, Equipment, and Deployment Master Plan. Item 3: Relocation and Retention of Fire Station 9 Operational Necessity of Fire Station 9 The current Plan addresses the placement of twelve fire stations in the network. Specifically, fire station 9 has been addressed by the 2014 Council resolution which modified the Plan to say: Fire Station 9 will continue to operate. After all three proposed new stations (Millenia, Otay Ranch Village 8, and Bayfront) are constructed and operating, an analysis will be completed to determine whether or not operation of this station is still necessary. Subsequent to the 2014 Council resolution, staff has conducted additional rigorous analysis and determined that there is a need to relocate and operate Station 9 as a permanent facility. 343 P a g e | 4 In 2014, when Council modified the resolution to continue operation of Fire Station 9, and to conduct an operational necessity assessment after construction of Millenia, Bayfront, and Village 8 fire stations; Fire Department staff at that time did not address the need to replace the aging and dilapidated building. Since that time in 2014, the station has suffered several costly major repairs due to mold growth and ongoing deteriorated underground plumbing and was subsequently found to contain asbestos. Station 9 was built in 1960, and has far exceeded its life as a dependable facility. It was not built to earthquake standards and therefore is not considered an essential building. It is limited in terms of housing modern fire equipment since the door height is too low and cannot accommodate current fire apparatus. Due to the critical need to rebuild Station 9, Fire Department staff recognized the urgent need to conduct the assessment of operational necessity immediately versus after construction of all three proposed new stations (Millenia, Otay Ranch Village 8, and Bayfront). Staff possesses specialized computer software technology called ADAM (Apparatus Deployment Analysis Module). ADAM is a “what if,” predictive modeling tool that uses historic CAD data, GIS map data, and a projection algorithm that projects the impact on response times due to adding units or stations, and relocating apparatus. Optimizer is yet another modeling software used in conjunction with ADAM and utilized by the Fire Department to provide the most effective deployment plan in terms of locations for stations and apparatus. Using the ADAM and Optimizer technology, and based on established fire department metrics set at 90% compliance; response thresholds are closest to being achieved in three metrics when Fire Station 9 remains as a permanent resource. The permanent closure of the station at buildout, negatively affects the department’s ability to achieve compliance. Most notable is the Effective Response Force (ERF) at 68.57% compliance versus 82.16% compliance when the station remains open. Staff has analyzed data and determined that Fire Station 9 is an integral part of the operational network of resources and should remain as a necessary permanent facility. Relocation of Fire Station 9 The fire department has evaluated this opportunity to assess whether station 9 should be rebuilt on the existing property or whether there is an alternate location that will produce improved overall response times in the network of fire stations in the west/southwest; with consideration being given to the fact that fire station 5 will be relocated and the Bayfront fire station will be built in approximately 2021. After researching alternate locations for both fire station 5 and 9, data shows an improved response capability when the Bayfront station is located near J Street and Bay Boulevard, fire station 5 is located at Fourth Avenue and Orange Avenue, and Fire Station 9 is located near the intersection of Moss Street and Naples Street. This ideal location for station 9 improves response times overall. This combination gives the best performance improvement to better serve the community and to make improvements to response metrics. Item 4: Policy and plan for the purchased and retention of fire apparatus and equipment The Fire Department responds to Fire, Rescue and Emergency Medical incidents both within the City and 344 P a g e | 5 surrounding cities. In addition, the Fire Department provides mutual aid assistance throughout the State of California on a reimbursable basis. These emergency services are provided with the following frontline fire apparatus – eight (8) triple combination pumper engines, two (2) aerial ladder trucks, one (1) heavy rescue (urban search and rescue) unit, one (1) brush engine and two (2) command vehicles. The reserve fire apparatus currently consists of the following – five (5) reserve triple combination pumper engines, one (1) reserve aerial ladder truck and two (2) reserve command vehicles. Due to several factors including decreased vehicle replacement funding, excessive years of service, escalating maintenance costs, increased downtime of frontline apparatus, decreased fleet depth, decreased reliability and safety issues; the Fire Department and Public Works – Fleet Management Division have been significantly challenged with maintaining an adequate fire apparatus fleet (frontline and reserve). In recent years, the Fire Department and Public Works – Fleet Management Division have seen drastic increases in overall mechanical repair expenses with routine repairs as well as major system repairs. These unpredictable increases in expenses have caused budgetary problems for the Public Works – Fleet Management Division. In addition, fire apparatus “out of service” times, lack of reliability and safety concerns all increased to a point that the Fire Department was negatively affected with emergency fire and medical service response capabilities. National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Standard 1901 on Automotive Fire Apparatus and other National Fleet Maintenance Organizations recommend large vehicle replacements based on several criteria to include, years of service, mileage, maintenance costs, functional obsolescence, and inability to obtain repair parts as well as technology and safety improvements. After extensive research of National industry standard recommendations and standards adopted by other Fire Departments, the Fire Department and Public Works – Fleet Management Division recommend the adoption of a revised Apparatus and Equipment Replacement Policy (Attachment A) to supersede the original policy adopted by Council on February 2, 1985 as resolution #11924 (Attachment B). The revised Apparatus & Equipment Replacement policy includes a range for years of frontline and reserve service for specific fire apparatus, command vehicles and equipment. This range is designed into the policy to enable the Fire Department and Public Works – Fleet Management Division to work collaboratively to assess each replacement to determine the most appropriate replacement year within the range. As part of the overall assessment of when to make the replacement within the range, the Fire Department and Public Works – Fleet Management Division will assess several factors to include: Age Mileage Engine Hours Pump Hours Out of Service Hours Maintenance Costs Obsolescence 345 P a g e | 6 Timeline Goals for Replacement of Apparatus A. It will be the goal to replace all fire apparatus (triple combination pumper engines, aerial ladder trucks, heavy rescue units (urban search and rescue), and type III brush engines at: a. 17 years of total service i. 10 to 12 years in frontline service ii. 5 to 7 years in reserve service B. All command vehicles at: a. 10 to 12 years of total service i. 7 years in frontline service ii. 3 to 5 years in reserve service C. All Staff vehicles at: a. 10 years of service and/or 100,000 miles In addition, it will be the goal of the Fire Department to replace other critical equipment at specific intervals per NFPA recommendations, manufacturer recommendations, or Cal-Osha regulations due to improvements in functionality, technology and safety as well as overall wear and tear of the equipment. With the use of Measure “P” funds, the Fire Department and Public Works – Fleet Management Division have implemented a specific Measure “P” – Apparatus and Equipment Spending Plan. This plan has begun to correct the issues associated with the aging apparatus fleet and equipment. The plan includes the escalations of some apparatus, command vehicle and equipment purchases on altered time intervals. These adjusted purchase intervals are required to eventually create sustainable and consistent replacement cycles for the entire fleet of apparatus and equipment. DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT Staff has reviewed the decision contemplated by this action and has determined that it is not site-specific and consequently, the 500-foot rule found in California Code of Regulations Title 2, section 18702.2(a)(11), is not applicable to this decision for purposes of determining a disqualifying real property-related financial conflict of interest under the Political Reform Act (Cal. Gov't Code § 87100, et seq.). Staff is not independently aware, and has not been informed by any City Council member, of any other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter. LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS The City’s Strategic Plan has five major goals: Operational Excellence, Economic Vitality, Healthy Community, Strong and Secure Neighborhoods and a Connected Community. The addendum to the Chula Vista Fire Department Fire Facility, Equipment, and Deployment Master Plan has a direct link to the City’s strategic goals of Strong and Secure Neighborhoods as well as Operational Excellence. 346 P a g e | 7 CURRENT-YEAR FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact in FY2018-19 as a result of this resolution. This resolution is requesting City Council accept the addendum document to the Chula Vista Fire Department Fire Facility, Equipment, and Deployment Master Plan. ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT There is no ongoing fiscal impact as a result of this resolution. This resolution is requesting City Council accept the addendum document to the Chula Vista Fire Department Fire Facility, Equipment, and Deployment Master Plan. Any future fiscal impacts will be considered by the City Council as part of the annual budget process. ATTACHMENTS Chula Vista Fire Department Fire Facility, Equipment, and Deployment Master Planaddendum document Staff Contact: Jim Geering, Fire Chief 347 FIRE FACILITY, EQUIPMENT, AND DEPLOYMENT MASTER PLAN ADDENDUM DOCUMENT AUGUST 14, 2018 Written by Jim Geering, Fire Chief 348 1 | P a g e City of Chula Vista Fire Department Addendum and Update to Fire Facility, Equipment, and Deployment Master Plan Introduction This document will address changes to the Chula Vista Fire Department Fire Facility, Equipment, and Deployment Master Plan (Plan) which was adopted by City Council via resolution 2014-018 on January 28, 2014. It is intended to be used as an addendum to the Plan specific to the Plan’s Conclusions and Recommendations found on page 149, and specific to the following modifications to the Plan voted upon by Council in 2014. Within the resolution to adopt the Plan, Council approved modifications to the Plan and established two new service levels/response standards that included the following: • Arrival of the first unit on scene to a fire or medical emergency within seven minutes, 90% of the time. • Arrival of the Effective Response Force, consisting of 14 firefighters on scene within ten minutes, 90% of the time for all structure fires. Council also adopted a policy for implementation of full time four person staffing for all engine companies consistent with the following language: • Adopt a policy for implementation of full time four-person staffing for all engine companies as funding is available. In addition, Council modified the plan specific to Fire Station 9 by adding the following language: • Fire Station 9 will continue to operate. After all three proposed new stations are constructed and operating an analysis will be completed to determine whether or not operation of this station is still necessary. Council’s modifications to the plan are addressed here in this addendum/update to the Plan which includes four new implementation strategies consistent with Council’s direction: 1. Implementation of Squads as a way to improve distribution of resources thereby enabling arrival of the first unit on scene to a fire or medical emergency within seven minutes 90% of the time. 2. Implementation of 4.0 staffing as a way to improve concentration of resources thereby enabling arrival of the Effective Response Force, consisting of 14 firefighters on scene within ten minutes, 90% of the time. 3. Retention and relocation of Fire Station 9 and relocation of Fire Station 5, as a result of analysis for operational necessity. 4. Policy for the retention of fire apparatus and purchase of equipment. 349 2 | P a g e Implementation Strategy 1 • Squad Implementation (Distribution): Arrival of the first unit on scene to a fire or medical emergency within seven minutes, 90% of the time. In Chula Vista, distribution of resources has proven to be an issue affecting the Fire Department’s ability to arrive on scene within 7 minutes 90% of the time. Fire Department on scene arrival is a function of three considerations; concentration, distribution, and resource availability/reliability. Concentration is the ability to assemble multiple units at one emergency within the adopted time to transition from stabilization of the emergency to mitigation of the emergency. Distribution is the geography of emergency resources and the travel time to emergencies to initiate stabilization of the emergency. Resource Availability/Reliability is the degree to which the resources are ready and available to respond. The probability of any given unit’s availability (or unavailability) is one indicator of the Fire Department’s response reliability. Response reliability is defined as the probability that the required number of competently prepared staff and properly equipped apparatus will be available when a fire or emergency call is received. As the number of emergency calls per day increases, the probability that a needed piece of apparatus will be busy when a call is received also increases. Consequently, if the right amount of redundancy is not built into the system to ensure timely and adequate response to emergency calls can be maintained, the Department’s response reliability decreases. To measure response reliability, all types of calls for service must be considered. Today, EMS calls have an impact on the availability of Fire Department resources and are considered in the overall evaluation of Department reliability. Response reliability can be determined from historical run data and is typically expressed as a per/company statistic as well as an agency-wide statistic. The table below indicates total calls for service by year with the percentage of increase per year. Table 1: Calls For Service by Year Calendar Year Total % Diff. (+) 2017 21,445 7.8 2016 19,892 4.7 2015 18,998 6.6 2014 17,825 8.8 2013 16,377 TOTAL 30.9 Fire Department Performance Current Fire Department emergency operational performance does not meet established performance metrics such as: • EMS: First unit on-scene within 7 minutes 90% of the time; capable of establishing command, providing basic life support patient care, and initiating advanced life support patient care. Actual performance in 2016 for EMS calls was 80.3%. 350 3 | P a g e • Compliance with GMOC response time standard of 7 minutes 80% of the time. The chart below illustrates the response performance by station for fire and EMS calls in 2016. Chart 1: Fire & EMS Calls for Service % met within 7 minutes It is clear to see that units on the west (stations 1, 2, 5, and 9) are closer to achieving the metric of 90% compared to units on the east (stations 3, 4, 6, 7, and 8). With the help of the chart above and the mapping illustration below, areas of performance deficiency are clearly noted. The primary performance measure that drives the distribution/location for fire stations is travel time. The distribution of fire stations is a primary factor in the ability to meet response times. As mentioned earlier, distribution is the geography or placement of emergency response resources and their travel time to emergencies to initiate stabilization at the scene. Adequate distribution will allow for acceptable response time travel. Distribution of resources creates challenges on the east side of the City. Station locations are spread out further from one another and do not provide overlap of coverage that is seen on the west side of the City. In addition, the street network in the east does not provide an even spaced grid of street networks as it does in the east. A look at the map below shows fire station response areas indicated by ¾ mile radius circles. These circles are consistent with the Insurance Service Organization (ISO) recommended coverage areas. The network of fire stations (distribution) on the east does not share the same coverage as the distribution of stations on the west. An improvement to the distribution of resources is necessary to meet the 90% response time standard. 351 4 | P a g e Map 1: Coverage with Current Station Locations By looking at the map above and in order to achieve the response threshold, it is necessary to identify opportunities to create a greater degree of overlap of the response circles within the distribution network in the east. One way to achieve this is to build more fire stations and staff them with resources. Another way is to follow a re-emerging and growing trend to add less expensive Squads to the distribution of resources. The implementation of Measure A funded Fire/Medic Squads will be executed simultaneously with several other measures most of which do not have a cost or are funded through pass through fees collected through the Department’s First Responder Advanced Life Support (FRALS) Program (non-general fund). The Squads will serve areas of the City with high call volume, or areas that are vacated due to another unit going out of district for fuel, mechanical repairs, or training. The Squads will also supplement areas of the City known to have poor response times as indicated by data already collected by the Fire Department. Fire/Medic Squads will provide additional units to the response network thereby bolstering the distribution of resources. Providing better distribution through implementation of Squads allows for the improvement of availability/reliability discussed earlier. With increased distribution of response units and the improvement to units being available to respond, response times will trend downwards towards the goal of 7 minutes 90% of the time. Arriving prior to the seven-minute mark is intended to provide basic life support patient care to stabilize the sick and injured. Once the patient is stabilized, advanced life support skills can be initiated prior to the arrival of the transporting ambulance. With the arrival of the first on-scene unit within seven minutes, survivability increases significantly. 352 5 | P a g e Map 2: Coverage with Squads and Stations at Current locations In addition, several other improvements may be made to the system such as the deployment of AMR transport units without assistance of Fire Department resources to non-emergent calls for service. The current emergency dispatch triage classifications utilized by our communications center, San Diego Emergency Communications and Data Center (ECDC), involve a triaged rating of Level 1 (Emergent) to Level 4 (Non- Emergent). The Chula Vista Fire Department responds only to Level 1, Level 2, Level 3, and Traffic Accident classifications, all in an emergent (lights and siren) mode. Level 3 calls are considered urgent (non-emergent) responses for both first responder and transport units, however the current practice is to send both units to scene emergently as though they were responding to a Level 1 call. An internal Fire Department analysis revealed that out of the approximately 1,800 Level 3 calls for service, less than .12 percent of these responses involved patients suffering from acute conditions. With just two patients requiring Level 1 care out of 1,800 level 3 calls, a transport only response is appropriate. The elimination of a Chula Vista first responder unit from these calls is consistent with community standards in San Diego County Metro Zone dispatched agencies. The elimination of Level 3 responses by Chula Vista Fire Department resources will serve to improve unit availability/reliability thus assisting with meeting the 7 minutes 90% goal. There is another improvement that will be made at no cost. Upon arrival of a Squad, the Company Officer, after assessing the patient, may downgrade the call and cancel the responding engine company. Doing so will once again improve the engine company availability/reliability for other calls for service. In addition, time 353 6 | P a g e spent on scene by engine companies will be reduced as a result of Squad implementation and will contribute to their unit availability/reliability. In the future, the Fire Department is planning on implementing smart technology through the use of smart phones, apps, and the purchase and installation of new fire station alerting systems. The alerting systems are more efficient than current systems and have the capacity to alert firefighters of a call for service sooner than existing technology. Station alerting also talks directly to the smart phone via the app to automatically map the response route thereby eliminating time spent seeking directions prior to responding to the emergency. These improvements are also anticipated to be funded through the FRALS program with no impact to the General Fund. Another technology improvement will include GPS signal preemption technology that will reduce travel time delays caused by traffic stacking at intersections. The implementation of this improvement is currently underway. The implementation of Squads together with the above-mentioned changes and improvements, provide the best combination of efforts and efficiencies that will enable the Fire Department to achieve its 7-minute response metric 90% of the time. Implementation Strategy 2 Implementation of 4.0 Staffing (Concentration): On July 7, 2017, Council authorized the addition of the Fire Department’s first 4.0 staffed engine – Engine 51 located at Fire Station 1. The table below shows the positive impact 4.0 staffing of Engine 51 has on resource availability. Table 2: Comparison of 3-0 v. 4-0 Staffing on Engine 51 Incident Type Group 3-0 staff 4-0 staffed Difference in Average Time at Incident Approx. Total Time Gained in Availability Approx. Total Time Gained in Availability per day Count Average Time at Incident Count Average Time at Incident Fire 82 0:34:09 78 0:31:41 0:02:28 3:12:19 0:00:32 EMS 3,388 0:15:21 3,690 0:13:40 0:01:41 103:44:30 0:17:23 Total 3,470 3,768 106:56:49 0:17:55 3-0 Staffing of E51 from July 7, 2016 - July 6, 2017 (1 year) 4-0 Staffing of E51 from July 7, 2017 - June 30, 2018 (approx 1 year) As discussed earlier in this report, reliability and availability are two key factors that affect operational performance. Since implementing 4.0 staffing and based on the comparison analysis, Engine 51 has improved system reliability through increasing by more than nearly 107 hours, its availability to receive calls. As a result of improvements to Engine 51’s reliability and availability, it could accept emergency calls more often, thereby reducing response times that otherwise would have required a further unit to respond. The transition to 4.0 staffing on E51 was the first step towards increased staffing of engine companies in the Fire Department. Implementation of 4.0 staffing and other staffing improvements will continue with funding from Measure A, and has been separated into a short term staffing plan and a long term staffing plan. This approach will allow Squad implementation and 4.0 staffing to begin immediately in areas believed to be critical in terms of call volume loads and maximum impact and benefit to the network of resources. Further staffing improvements are discussed below. 354 7 | P a g e Short Term Staffing Plan Short term staffing costs will share two funding sources; funds generated by Measure A, and general fund dollars. In addition to the 4.0 staffing on Engine 51 previously mentioned above, Measure A will fund the implementation of 4.0 staffing at five additional engine companies: Engine 52 located at 80 East J. Street, Engine 55 currently located at 391 Oxford Street, Engine 57 located at 1640 Santa Venetia, Engine 60 at Millenia, and future Engine 61 at the Bayfront. Also funded by Measure A, is the above-mentioned addition of four new resources on the east side of the City called “Squads”. The short term plan will include the implementation of remaining staff (non-4.0 positions) on engines at Millenia and Bayfront fire stations which are general fund costs. Positions identified as Measure A funded, are consistent with Phase 1 of the City Council intended Public Safety Expenditure Plan. The table below demonstrates staffing position count totals. Table 3: Short Term Staffing Plan Position Total Count Location Funding Source Deputy Chief 1 1 Administration Measure A Fire Captain 14 2 Squad 1 Measure A 2 Squad 2 Measure A 2 Squad 3 Measure A 2 Squad 4 Measure A 3 Millenia Engine General Fund 3 Bayfront Engine General Fund Fire Engineer 6 3 Millenia Engine General Fund 3 Bayfront Engine General Fund Firefighter / Paramedic 14 2 Squad 1 Measure A 2 Squad 2 Measure A 2 Squad 3 Measure A 2 Squad 4 Measure A 3 Millenia Engine General Fund 3 Bayfront Engine General Fund Firefighter / EMT 18 3 4th Firefighter on E51 Measure A 3 4th Firefighter on E52 Measure A 3 4th Firefighter on E55 Measure A 3 4th Firefighter on E57 Measure A 3 4th FF at Millenia Measure A 3 4th FF at Bayfront Measure A Public Education Specialist 1 1 Fire Administration Measure A Total positions 36 Measure A 54 18 General Fund Note: In addition to the positions listed above, the intended spending plan allocates resources to support staff reimbursements, vehicles and IT equipment needs. 355 8 | P a g e Long Term Staffing Plan Should Measure A revenues surpass projected revenues, long term staffing costs will seek to use additional Measure A revenues first, followed by general fund dollars. Long term staffing includes 4.0 staffing at Engine 53 located at 1410 Brandywine, Engine 54 located at 850 Paseo Ranchero, Engine 56 located at 805 San Miguel Road, and Engine 58 located at 1180 Woods Drive. The long term plan will also implement a 4.0 staffed engine (Engine 59) which will complete the full and necessary compliment of one engine located in each fire station district throughout the City. The City currently runs one engine short at Fire Station 3. The addition of a 4.0 staffed truck (Truck 50) at the Bayfront fire station, a 4.0 staffed truck at Fire Station 4 (Truck 54), and a 4.0 staffed engine at the Village 8 fire station is also part of the long term staffing plan and indicated in the current Fire Facility, Equipment and Deployment Master Plan. The Plan, upon opening of the Millenia fire station, relocates Battalion 52 and Truck 57 to the Millenia fire station. However, staff recommends that Battalion 52 remain housed at Fire Station 7. This is a no cost item which will eliminate the need to add square footage to the Millenia fire station. Table 4: Long Term Staffing Plan Position Total Count Location Deputy Chief 1 1 Administration Fire Captain 12 3 Truck 50 3 Engine 59 3 Truck 54 3 Village 8 Fire Engineer 12 3 Truck 50 3 Engine 59 3 Truck 54 3 Village 8 Firefighter / Paramedic 12 3 Truck 50 3 Engine 59 3 Truck 54 3 Village 8 Firefighter / EMT 24 3 4th Firefighter on E53 3 4th Firefighter on E54 3 4th Firefighter on E56 3 4th Firefighter on E58 3 Truck 50 3 Engine 59 3 Truck 54 3 Village 8 Fire Inspector/ Investigator II 3 3 Fire Prevention 64 356 9 | P a g e Implementation Strategy 3 • Retention and Relocation of Fire Station 5 and 9 - Discussion The Fire Department has completed an assessment of the operational necessity of Station 9 prior to buildout of fire stations at Millenia, Otay Ranch Village 8, and Bayfront and determined that fire services and response times can be improved with relocation of fire stations 5 and 9. Analysis of Station 9 Retention and Operational Necessity Staff possesses specialized computer software technology called ADAM (Apparatus Deployment Analysis Module). ADAM is a “what if,” predictive modeling tool that uses historic CAD data, GIS map data, and a projection algorithm that projects the impact on response times due to adding units or stations, and relocating apparatus. Optimizer is yet another modeling software used in conjunction with ADAM and utilized by the Fire Department to provide the most effective deployment plan in terms of locations for stations and apparatus. Prior to using computer software to assess the service areas of Station 5 and 9, staff reviewed department call volume information for the previous three years (shown below). Each year, Fire station 9 is the third busiest firehouse with 2,299 calls for service attributed to Engine 59 in 2017. Closing Station 9 as contemplated in the 2014 Plan would place a severe negative impact on surrounding fire stations 2, 3, and 5. It should be noted that station 5 (Engine 55) is the second busiest firehouse in the City with 4,544 calls for service. Engine 55 has reached its response capacity and would be the most impacted in terms of additional call volume. As a result of closing Station 9, other units would absorb the call volume causing an impact to the network of response units. Unit reliability and availability would be affected and would cause units to respond into districts other than their own, leaving larger areas of the City uncovered. 357 10 | P a g e Table 5: Call Volume Comparison The call volume comparison chart above illustrates the call volume at Fire Station 9. The software analysis recommends moving station 9 west - closer to station 5. This software recommendation is consistent with the large call volume numbers seen at station 5 where response capacity has been reached. The table below shows the impacts to the response network if Station 9 were closed. The table uses current response unit locations and current call volume; and total projected response units with projected call volume at buildout, when the 12 fire station network is completed. For purpose of defining buildout, buildout includes 12 engines, Milenia fire station, Bayfront fire station, Village 8 fire station, 4.0 staffing on all engines, 4 squads, 4 trucks, one US&R, and two Battalions. 2017 2016 2015 Fire Company Fire Company Fire Company Unit # of Calls Monthly Ave.Daily Ave.Unit # of Calls Monthly Ave.Daily Ave.Unit # of Calls Monthly Ave.Daily Ave. CHF1 1 0.08 0.00 CHF1 1 0.08 0.00 CHF1 1 0.08 0.00 DEP1 4 0.33 0.01 DEP1 13 1.08 0.04 DEP1 4 0.33 0.01 FM1 0.00 0.00 FM1 0 0.00 0.00 FM1 2 0.17 0.01 B51 589 49.08 1.61 B51 718 59.83 1.97 B51 640 53.33 1.75 B52 287 23.92 0.79 B52 307 25.58 0.84 B52 302 25.17 0.83 BR56 43 3.58 0.12 BR56 25 2.08 0.07 BR56 22 1.83 0.06 E51 5,281 440.08 14.47 E51 4,838 403.17 13.25 E51 4,676 389.67 12.81 E52 1,833 152.75 5.02 E52 1,811 150.92 4.96 E52 1,782 148.50 4.88 USAR53 1,843 153.58 5.05 USAR53 1,639 136.58 4.49 USAR53 1,594 132.83 4.37 E54 1,519 126.58 4.16 E54 1,493 124.42 4.09 E54 1,524 127.00 4.18 E55 4,544 378.67 12.45 E55 4,220 351.67 11.56 E55 3,983 331.92 10.91 E56 1,198 99.83 3.28 E56 947 78.92 2.59 E56 931 77.58 2.55 E57 1,614 134.50 4.42 E57 1,512 126.00 4.14 E57 1,468 122.33 4.02 E58 1,287 107.25 3.53 E58 1,090 90.83 2.99 E58 1,121 93.42 3.07 E59 2,299 191.58 6.30 E59 2,238 186.50 6.13 E59 1,961 163.42 5.37 EMS1 6 0.50 0.02 EMS1 21 1.75 0.06 EMS1 50 4.17 0.14 T51 1,862 155.17 5.10 T51 1,787 148.92 4.90 T51 1,625 135.42 4.45 T57 467 38.92 1.28 T57 393 32.75 1.08 T57 436 36.33 1.19 TOTAL 24,677 2056.42 67.61 TOTAL 23,053 1921.08 63.16 TOTAL 22,122 1843.50 60.61 358 11 | P a g e Table 6: Current and Buildout Performance compared to Threshold Using the ADAM and Optimizer technology, and based on established fire department metrics set at 90% compliance; response thresholds are closest to being achieved in all three metrics when Fire Station 9 remains as a permanent resource. The permanent closure of the station at buildout, negatively affects the department’s ability to achieve compliance. Most notable is the ERF at 68.57% compliance versus 82.16% compliance when the station remains open. Staff has analyzed data and determined that Fire Station 9 is an integral part of the network of resources and should remain as a necessary permanent facility. % Met % Diff % Met % Diff % Met % Diff Current With Station 9 80.14 52.85 38.01 Without Station 9 77.53 2.61 46.57 6.28 31.59 6.42 15.31 Build Out * With Station 9 89.53 89.47 82.16 Without Station 9 87.03 2.5 88.19 1.28 68.57 13.59 17.37 * Build Out Station 9: 4-0 Staffed Engine 59 and USAR 59 ** Mutual Aid and AMR not included in calculations Current - 8 Engines, 2 Trucks, 1 US&R, 2 Battalions Build Out – 12 engines, 4 Trucks, 4 squads, 1 US&R, 2 Battalions, 3 New Stations (BayFront, Village 8 & Millenia), and relocated Stations 5 and 9. Initial Attack Force (IAF) Effective Response Force (ERF)% Diff without St 9 Emergency Medical Service (EMS) Threshold: 10:00 @ 90%Threshold: 7:00 @ 90%Threshold: 7:00 @ 90% 359 12 | P a g e Analysis of Station 9 Relocation Staff utilized existing and forecasted data to analyze the best location for Station 9 and what impact it will have on the network of fire stations. Staff also analyzed locations for the placement of new and relocated fire stations. Pinpointing the optimum locations for stations 5, 9, and Bayfront has a push and pull effect. For example, re- locating station 5 and leaving station 9 in its current location (and vice versa) does not yield the best effect for the network of stations in the west. The computer software provides an analysis of the optimum location where each station is best suited as a network. In other words, the best location for station 5, 9, or the Bayfront station, is based on the impact to the network and not solely on any particular district where a station physically resides. Likewise, the results shown in tables 8 and 9, rely on the placement of relocated or future fire stations as well as the addition of 4.0 staffing. It is important to note that while individual district response times are important, the response time thresholds reported on an annual basis, are founded on the entire fire station network average. Table 7 illustrates citywide network performance prior to implementation of 4.0 staffing on July 7, 2017 (Baseline). The table compares baseline performance to current performance which includes 4.0 staffing at stations 1, 2, 5, and 7. Adding 4.0 staffing provides an increase of 15.68% for Initial Attack Force (IAF). There is also an 8.29% improvement to ERF. Table 7: Baseline to Current (4 units 4-0 staffed) Baseline Performance* Current Performance** % Change From Baseline to Current CVFD Measures Incident Average Incident Percent Incident Average Incident Percent ALS – 1st unit in 7 mins, 90% 5:45 80.14% 5:45 80.14% No change IAF - 1st unit (E, 4FF) in 7 mins, 90% 7:22 52.85% 6:38 68.53% 15.68% ERF – 14 FF in 10:20, 90% 10:26 38.01% 10:15 46.30% 8.29% *Baseline is the original network (prior to July 7, 2017) did not include 4-0 staffing **Includes 4-0 staffing at Stations 1, 2, 5 and 7. Station 5 at 391 Oxford; Station 9 at 266 E. Oneida. 360 13 | P a g e Table 8 shows improvements from current performance after station 5 is relocated to Fourth Avenue and Orange Avenue and station 9 is relocated to Hilltop and Naples. The table also includes improvements from the baseline performance. Table 8: Relocated Station 5 & 9 Relocated St. 5 & 9 % Change From Current to Relocated 5 & 9 % Change From Baseline Performance CVFD Measures Incident Average Incident Percent ALS – 1st unit in 7 mins, 90% 5:46 80.24% 0.10% 0.10% IAF - 1st unit (E, 4FF) in 7 mins, 90% 6:34 70.10% 1.57% 17.25% ERF – 14 FF in 10:20, 90% 10:16 46.05% -0.25% 8.04% *Includes 4-0 staffing at Stations 1, 2, 5 and 7. Table 9 illustrates the positive effects of adding the Bayfront station (Bay Boulevard and J Street). The table also shows improvements from the baseline performance. Table 9: Adding Bayfront (BF) Station Bayfront Station Added % Change From relocated 5 & 9 to adding BF Station % Change From Baseline Performance CVFD Measures Incident Average Incident Percent ALS – 1st unit in 7 mins, 90% 5:36 83.95% 3.71% 3.81% IAF - 1st unit (E, 4FF) in 7 mins, 90% 6:26 70.65% 0.55% 17.80% ERF – 14 FF in 10:20, 90% 10:12 50.32% 4.27% 12.31% Source: Deccan 2016 Deployment, Mutual Aid not included When compared to the established baseline, there is a 17.8% improvement in IAF and a 12.31% improvement in ERF. After researching alternate locations for both fire station 5 and 9, data shows an improved response capability when the Bayfront station is located near J Street and Bay Boulevard, fire station 5 is located at Fourth Avenue and Orange Avenue, and fire station 9 is located near the intersection of Moss Street and Naples Street. This ideal location for station 9 improves response times overall. This combination gives the best performance improvement to the network of fire stations when 4.0 staffing is added. It is the recommendation of the Fire Department to leverage the opportunity and not only rebuild the station but re-locate it to better serve the community, and to make improvements to response metrics. 361 14 | P a g e The map below, illustrates the Plan’s final resource distribution when buildout of development occurs. Map 3: Coverage at Buildout 362 15 | P a g e Implementation Strategy 4 • Policy and plan for the purchased and retention of fire apparatus and equipment The Fire Department responds to Fire, Rescue and Emergency Medical incidents both within the City and surrounding cities. In addition, the Fire Department provides mutual aid assistance throughout the State of California on a reimbursable basis. These emergency services are provided with the following frontline fire apparatus – eight (8) triple combination pumper engines, two (2) aerial ladder trucks, one (1) heavy rescue (urban search and rescue) unit, one (1) brush engine and two (2) command vehicles. The reserve fire apparatus currently consists of the following – five (5) reserve triple combination pumper engines, one (1) reserve aerial ladder truck and two (2) reserve command vehicles. Due to several factors including decreased vehicle replacement funding, excessive years of service, escalating maintenance costs, increased downtime of frontline apparatus, decreased fleet depth, decreased reliability and safety issues; the Fire Department and Public Works – Fleet Management Division have been significantly challenged with maintaining an adequate fire apparatus fleet (frontline and reserve). In recent years, the Fire Department and Public Works – Fleet Management Division have seen drastic increases in overall mechanical repair expenses with routine repairs as well as major system repairs. These unpredictable increases in expenses have caused budgetary problems for the Public Works – Fleet Management Division. In addition, fire apparatus “out of service” times, lack of reliability and safety concerns all increased to a point that the Fire Department was negatively affected with emergency fire and medical service response capabilities. National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Standard 1901 on Automotive Fire Apparatus and other National Fleet Maintenance Organizations recommend large vehicle replacements based on several criteria to include, years of service, mileage, maintenance costs, functional obsolescence, and inability to obtain repair parts as well as technology and safety improvements. After extensive research of National industry standard recommendations and standards adopted by other Fire Departments, the Fire Department and Public Works – Fleet Management Division recommend the adoption of a revised Apparatus and Equipment Replacement Policy (below) to supersede the original policy adopted by Council on February 2, 1985 as resolution #11924. The revised Apparatus & Equipment Replacement policy includes a range for years of frontline and reserve service for specific fire apparatus, command vehicles and equipment. This range is designed into the policy to enable the Fire Department and Public Works – Fleet Management Division to work collaboratively to assess each replacement to determine the most appropriate replacement year within the range. As part of the overall assessment of when to make the replacement within the range, the Fire Department and Public Works – Fleet Management Division will assess several factors to include: • Age • Mileage • Engine Hours • Pump Hours • Out of Service Hours • Maintenance Costs • Obsolescence 363 16 | P a g e Timeline Goals for Replacement of Apparatus A. It will be the goal to replace all fire apparatus (triple combination pumper engines, aerial ladder trucks, heavy rescue units (urban search and rescue), and type III brush engines at: a. 17 years of total service i. 10 to 12 years in frontline service ii. 5 to 7 years in reserve service B. All command vehicles at: a. 10 to 12 years of total service i. 7 years in frontline service ii. 3 to 5 years in reserve service C. All Staff vehicles at: a. 10 years of service and/or 100,000 miles In addition, it will be the goal of the Fire Department to replace other critical equipment at specific intervals per NFPA recommendations, manufacturer recommendations, or Cal-Osha regulations due to improvements in functionality, technology and safety as well as overall wear and tear of the equipment. A. 2 ½” and 1 ¾” Fire Hose a. 10 years of service B. 4” Fire Hose a. 17 years of service C. Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA) and Rescue Air equipment a. 10 to 12 years of service D. Mobile and Portable Radio (800 Mhz and VHF) a. 10 to 12 years of service E. Thermal Imaging Cameras (TICs) a. 10 to 12 years of service F. Rescue rope and rope hardware a. 10 years G. Mobile Data Computers (MDCs) a. 5 to 7 years of service H. Combustible Gas Monitors a. 5 to 7 years of service With the use of Measure “P” funds, the Fire Department and Public Works – Fleet Management Division have implemented a specific Measure “P” – Apparatus and Equipment Spending Plan. This plan has begun to correct the issues associated with the aging apparatus fleet and equipment. The plan includes the escalations of some apparatus, command vehicle and equipment purchases on altered time intervals. 364 17 | P a g e These adjusted purchase intervals are required to eventually create sustainable and consistent replacement cycles for the entire fleet of apparatus and equipment. 365 RESOLUTION NO. __ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ADOPTING AN ADDENDUM TO THE CHULA VISTA FIRE FACILITY, EQUIPMENT, AND DEPLOYMENT MASTER PLAN. WHEREAS, the Chula Vista Fire Department Fire Facility, Equipment, and Deployment Master Plan (Plan) was adopted by City Council via resolution 2014-018 on January 28, 2014, and; WHEREAS, the Plan needs to be updated to reflect current and future needs summarized below, and; WHEREAS, there is a need to relocate Fire Station 9 and address the outstanding issue of retaining the station for the long term, and; WHEREAS, as part of the Fire Department response capability, there is a need to address response time threshold issues, which call for the addition of a Strategic, Quick-Unit Apparatus Delivery (SQUAD) and 4.0 staffing, and; WHEREAS, the current apparatus and equipment retention plan is obsolete and requires the establishment of a modern replacement policy, and; WHEREAS, the addendum will update the Plan so that it can be used to guide future Fire Department improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, that it adopts the addendum to the Chula Vista Fire Facility, Equipment, and Deployment Master Plan. Presented by Approved as to form by Jim Geering Glen R. Googins Fire Chief City Attorney 366