HomeMy WebLinkAbout2018-07-24 Written Communications - Item 7 LippittIkrkh CommWhiC2-fMs
Cultivating Disaster:
https:Hsilentpoison.com/
https://ourenvironment.berkeley.edu/news/2017/1 0/cannabis-crop-expansion-threatens-
wild life -habitats
https://www,sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/10/171031202705.htm
The Effect of Cannabis Cultivation on the Environment of
Calaveras County
For Immediate Release
October 18, 2017
(October 18, 2017 - San Andreas, California) Calaveras
County Supervisor Dennis Mills released a report at the
County Board of Supervisors on the impact of marijuana
cultivation on the county's environment. The
report, Cultivating Disaster: The Effect of Cannabis
Cultivation on the Environment of Calaveras County
finds that cannabis cultivation has created incredible damage
to the environment effectively dumping poisonous chemicals
into the streams, rivers, and ground water. The report
concludes with a recommendation that the
Supervisors pass an immediate ban on any cannabis/pot
cultivation in the county.
"The decision by the previous county Board of
Supervisors to temporarily allow marijuana cultivation in our
county was a huge mistake." Supervisor Mills continued "The
environmental damaged caused by the crazy experiment has
caused hundreds of millions of dollars in clean up and polluted
rivers and streams. The impact will be with us for decades."
Mills concluded "The only answer to this ecological disaster is
the ban it and end the pollution."
Cultivating Disaster, prepared with The Communications
Institute (TCI), was based upon extensive research and/or
interdictions by law enforcement, academic experts, and
officials from the United States Fish and Wildlife Service,
California Department of Fish and Game, and many others.
TCI is a public policy research and educational center that
produced numerous studies and educational programs on land
use and environmental issues.
The report points out that there are now as many
as 1,200 marijuana growing sites in the county which must be
cleaned up at an estimated cost of $250 million to more than
a billion dollars. The report makes the following conclusions:
Marijuana Cultivation has damaged the environment
The scope and depth of the problem is not understood by
policy makers, the public or the media.
Dangerous
chemicals
have been
used by growers that illegal
and/or not
approved
for use for
marijuana cultivation
Numerous growers have been cited for violations
The cost of mitigation of the estimated 1,200 plus sites could
be as high as $250 million to $2 billion dollars in just this one
county.
The US Clean Water Act and other laws have not been
enforced and/or abided by.
The research report makes the following recommendations:
Calaveras County Ordinance - The Calaveras County
Board of Supervisors should pass an ordinance banning
the cultivation of marijuana or cannabis in both the open
and in -door facilities.
Calaveras Ecological Task Force (CETF) - The report
proposes the creation of task force involving all agencies
federal, state, regional and local agencies to work together
to eradicate illegal growing, clean up the environment, and
deal with law enforcement/public safety issues.
Water Quality Analysis - Recommends that the United
States Environmental Protection Agency undertake a study
of the impact of the ecological damage to the water quality
in the county and propose steps that should be taken to
protect the watersheds and provide a plan for Mitigation.
Law Enforcement - Recommend that the United States
Drug Enforcement Administration and other appropriate
agencies take action to evaluate grant money and
manpower support to eradicate illegal marijuana
production
and insure
the
shutting down of
legal `
operations
includes
their
complete clean
up.
Prosecution - Proposes that the District Attorney of Calaveras
County work with the United States and California Attorney
Generals to prosecute those that have broken federal and state
laws and county ordinances and seek full prosecution criminally
and/or civilly and explore seek funding to pay for the cleanup
of the land in the county. There needs to be a true cost
recovery with a Nexus study.
Mills pointed out that a new draft study by the California Water
Control Board, to be released this week, totally exempts indoor
growing from water quality testing. "This is just another
example of the indifference of Brown Administration to
significant environmental problems." Mills noted "There are no
chemicals that have been approved by the either the EPA or
the FDA for use in the growing of marijuana."
The sixty -page report is based upon research and analysis
provided by federal, state, and local agencies and includes an
extensive bibliography of articles from leading academic and
media organizations including Stanford, Harvard, Yale,
Scientific American and the University of California. The report
points to a silent poison that been entering into the
environment of California and hence the study
website: www.silentRoison.com.
www.SilentPoison.com, (209) 559-36271
info@silentpoison.com
The people of Calaveras County recognize that the County needs
to ban commercial cultivation of marijuana.
This commercial industry has moved into our communities,
neighborhoods and County turning residential property zones into
commercial marijuana cultivation zones. Many of these commercial
grows are being protected with firearms, guard dogs and
thugs. Commercial marijuana cultivation is presently causing
environmental damage in Calaveras County. Violations at some
purportedly organic grows include unlawful chemical releases,
illegal use, storage, and disposal of hazardous materials and
hazardous waste including fungicides, herbicides, pesticides,
rodenticides, and use of some chemicals so toxic, they've been
banned for years in the U.S.
Growers are diverting our streams to support their marijuana irrigation
systems, against the Clean Water Act. This type of activity is putting
children and family's health, safety and welfare at unnecessary
risk. Regulation will not prohibit this commercial activity from
taking place in your neighborhoods or keep it away from your
families and your homes.
The Committee to Ban Commercial Cultivation continues to be
dedicated and working hard to get a ban on commercial
cultivation of marijuana and commercial marijuana activities
that are taking place in our neighborhoods and communities.
DEA
INTELLIGENCE
REPORT
4
Rupp-
dam—
AL
�y. �ssr'.� .. .� ice- _ � �-�T-�b �i tL �'y-:1••,r .��
UNCLASSIFIED
Executive Summary
Colorado's state laws legalizing marijuana do not limit how much marijuana can be grown within a private
residence. Further, there is no mechanism at the state -level to document or regulate home grows, even
large ones. This has led to a proliferation of large-scale marijuana grow operations in hundreds of homes
throughout the state. Much of the marijuana produced in large home grows is shipped out of Colorado and
sold in markets where it commands a high price.
Although growing a large number of marijuana plants within private residences can fall within the parameters of
state law, it presents potential risk to the occupants, homeowners, and neighbors of these residences, as well
as to first responders who are called to them. Marijuana grows often cause extensive damage to the houses
where they are maintained and are increasingly the causes of house fires, blown electrical transformers, and
environmental damage. Much like the "meth houses" of the 1990s, many of these homes may ultimately be
rendered uninhabitable.
DETAILS
Colorado's legalization of medical marijuana and recreational marijuana by voter referendum set the stage
for unfettered marijuana production in the state. Both Amendment 20 and Amendment 64 contain loopholes
that allow for large marijuana grows within private residences. Although the State of Colorado created the
Marijuana Enforcement Division (MED)—a regulatory body for licensed marijuana businesses—the MED does
not have authority to regulate home grows.
According to the Colorado
Department of Public Health
and Environment, in January
2016 there were 8,2 10 medical
marijuana patients in Colorado
with physician recommendations
to grow 50 to 99 plants. If each
patient grew 50 plants, that
equals 410, 000 marijuana plants.
From each plant, they would
likely harvest 1 pound of finished
marijuana every 90 days. That is
1.64 million pounds of harvested
marijuana per year.
Access to medical marijuana became every Coloradan's constitutional
right in November 2000 when voters approved Amendment 20.
Amendment 20 allows patients to possess six marijuana plants, unless a
physician recommends more. As of 2016, physician recommendations
for 75 to 99 plants are commonly used to justify large residential grows,
many of which produce marijuana for sale outside the state. In January
2016, there were 107,798 medical marijuana registry patients. Of those,
roughly 8 percent (8,210 patients) had physician recommendations for 50
to 99 plants.' Notably, in January 2014, when cultivation and possession
of recreational marijuana became legal under state law, there were more
overall medical marijuana patients (110,979), but fewer with elevated
plant counts of 50 or more plants (5,308).2
As of March 2016, there is not a state -imposed limit on either the number
of plants a physician may recommend for a medical marijuana patient
or on the number of plants a patient may grow in a private residence. In
May 2015, state legislation was passed that limited medical marijuana patients to growing 99 plants on private
property—it will take effect January 2017.3
Amendment 64 allows any adult 21 years old or older in Colorado to cultivate up to six plants.
It further allows for the possession of all marijuana produced by those plants, provided the marijuana remains
in the enclosed residence and is not sold." Amendment 64 also allows any adult in Colorado to "assist" any
other adult in Colorado in "possessing, growing, processing, or transporting" his/her marijuana .5 Consequently,
large grows and/or quantities of processed marijuana within a residence are often justified through the claim
2
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
that the resident is assisting others by
growing or storing their marijuana. As there
is no mechanism at the state or local level to
document or regulate recreational marijuana
home grows, there is no practical means for
local police to verify whose plants are grown
or whose marijuana is stored in any given
residence.
Some local governments have begun to place
limits on the number of plants that can be
grown in private residences. However, such
local ordinances are widely varied and rarely
effectively enforced.
As a result of the permissiveness of
Colorado's medical and recreational
marijuana laws, the system is extensively
exploited by traffickers who operate large
marijuana grows that supply out-of-state
markets. Since 2014, there has been a
noticeable increase in organized networks of
sophisticated residential grows in Colorado
that are orchestrated and operated by drug
trafficking organizations. These organizations
operate hundreds of large-scale home grows
throughout Colorado. Harvested marijuana is
shipped or transported from Colorado to markets in the Midwest and along the
East Coast.'
Source: DEA
Indoor marijuana plants can grow as tall as 6 feet or more and yield more than a pound of harvested marijuana
every 90 days. Growing them requires specific conditions that consume high levels of electrical power
and water and results in the drainage of chemical -laden waste water. Grow rooms must be maintained at
temperatures between 71 and 80 degrees Fahrenheit. At certain times during the growing cycle, plants must
remain under high-power grow lights for 24 hours a day. Fertilizers and pesticides—sometimes harsh ones—
are required to grow robust and healthy plants. At times in the growing cycle, each plant can require 3 or more
gallons of water per day.
Local police departments often receive numerous calls from neighbors about marijuana grow houses.
Common complaints include strong odors, excessive noise from industrial air-conditioning units, blown
electrical transformers, and heavy vehicle traffic.
Colorado homes where marijuana is grown often sustain extensive structural damage. Moisture,
condensation, and molds spread throughout the residence. Growers often cut holes in floors and exterior walls
in order to install ventilation tubes. Growers often tamper with electrical systems in order to supply multiple
high-power grow lights and industrial air-conditioning units. These alterations are often done by tenant growers
with little regard for fire risk or the home's structural integrity. This is an increasing concern for first responders.
3
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED J
Source: DEA
Altered electrical systems with loose and
entangled wires, flammable fertilizers and
chemicals, explosive materials such as
propane and butane, or holes cut into sub-
floors for venting all pose clear hazards to
firefighters or police officers responding to
the residence in an emergency situation.
Outlook
Adding to the list of unintended
consequences of marijuana legalization
in Colorado, the proliferation of large
residential grows is taxing local police and
fire departments, consuming power and
water resources, and potentially affecting
home values in communities throughout
the state. Further, the ability to establish
large-scale marijuana grow operations
within residential homes under the guise
of state law will likely continue to attract
drug traffickers and criminal organizations.
Thus, Colorado will continue to be a source
for much of the marijuana destined for
markets in other states.
1 Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, January 2016.
2 Ibid,
3 Colorado Senate Bill 15-014, passed May 2015.
4 Colorado Constitution. Article 18, Section 16, Subsection 3(b).
5 Colorado Constitution. Article 18, Section 16, Subsection 3(e)
e DEA Denver Division Investigative Reporting. 2016; extracted information is: (U); overall document classification is: (U).
This product was prepared by the DEA Denver Division. Comments and questions may be
addressed to the Chief, Analysis and Production Section at dea.onsi(a.usdojgov.
4
UNCLASSIFIED