Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 2018_07_10July 10, 2018City Council Agenda APPROVAL OF MINUTES of April 24, 2018, 2:00 p.m. and 5:00 p.m. 18-02841.18-0284 Council approve the minutes. Recommended Action: A.RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA RECITING THE FACT OF THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD IN THIS CITY ON JUNE 5, 2018, DECLARING THE RESULTS THEREOF, AND OTHER MATTERS AS ARE PROVIDED BY LAW B.RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA CALLING A SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 6, 2018, FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONDUCTING A RUN-OFF ELECTION TO ELECT A MAYOR, TWO MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL, REPRESENTING DISTRICTS 1 AND 2, AND A CITY ATTORNEY; CONSOLIDATING THE ELECTION WITH THE STATEWIDE ELECTION; AND REQUESTING THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TO PERMIT THE REGISTRAR OF VOTERS TO PERFORM CERTAIN SERVICES FOR THE CONDUCT OF THE ELECTION C.RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ADOPTING REGULATIONS FOR CANDIDATES FOR ELECTIVE OFFICE PERTAINING TO MATERIALS SUBMITTED TO THE ELECTORATE AT THE SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 6, 2018 18-02042.18-0204 City Clerk Department: The activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required. Environmental Notice: Council adopt the resolutions. Recommended Action: Page 2 City of Chula Vista Printed on 7/5/2018 July 10, 2018City Council Agenda RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING THE AUTHORIZED POSITION COUNT IN THE POLICE DEPARTMENT WITH NO NET INCREASE IN AUTHORIZED STAFFING AND APPROPRIATING $43,505 IN PERSONNEL AND REVENUES IN THE FY19 POLICE GRANTS SECTION OF THE FEDERAL GRANTS FUND 18-02825.18-0282 Police Department Department: The Director of Development Services has reviewed the proposed activity for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines because it will not result in a physical change in the environment; therefore, pursuant to Section 15060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Thus, no environmental review is required. Environmental Notice: Council adopt the resolution. Recommended Action: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA SUPPORTING THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA'S APPLICATION FOR THE AMERICAN CITIES CLIMATE CHALLENGE GRANT 18-02996.18-0299 Economic Development Department Department: The activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required . The Director of Development Services has reviewed the proposed activity for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines because it will not result in a physical change in the environment; therefore, pursuant to Section 15060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Thus, no environmental review is required. Environmental Notice: Council adopt the resolution. Recommended Action: ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR Page 4 City of Chula Vista Printed on 7/5/2018 July 10, 2018City Council Agenda PUBLIC COMMENTS Persons speaking during Public Comments may address the Council on any subject matter within the Council’s jurisdiction that is not listed as an item on the agenda. State law generally prohibits the Council from discussing or taking action on any issue not included on the agenda, but, if appropriate, the Council may schedule the topic for future discussion or refer the matter to staff. Comments are limited to three minutes. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following item(s) have been advertised as public hearing(s) as required by law. If you wish to speak on any item, please fill out a “Request to Speak” form (available in the lobby) and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ADDING CHAPTER 19.100 TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADOPT AND ESTABLISH AN URBAN AGRICULTURE INCENTIVE ZONE (FIRST READING) 18-01757.18-0175 Development Services Department Department: The activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the activity qualifies for an Exemption pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines. Environmental Notice: Council conduct the public hearing and place the ordinance on first reading. Recommended Action: A.ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE EASTERN URBAN CENTER PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT REGULATIONS AND DESIGN PLAN (FORM BASED CODE) FOR 207 ACRES OF LAND IN THE EASTERN URBAN CENTER PORTION OF THE OTAY RANCH RELATING TO MODIFICATIONS IN THE OVERALL BUILDOUT INTENSITY, BUILDING HEIGHTS AND DISTRICT 6 REGULATIONS (FIRST READING) 18-02028.18-0202 Page 5 City of Chula Vista Printed on 7/5/2018 July 10, 2018City Council Agenda B.RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA CONSIDERING THE MODIFICATIONS TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL PUBLIC FACILITIES FINANCE PLAN (PFFP) AND FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS (FIA) AND APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE EASTERN URBAN CENTER SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA (SPA) PLAN AND ASSOCIATED REGULATORY DOCUMENTS RELATING TO MODIFICATIONS IN THE OVERALL BUILDOUT INTENSITY, BUILDING HEIGHTS AND DISTRICT 6 REGULATIONS C.RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA CONSIDERING THE ADDENDUM TO EIR 07-01 AND APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE EASTERN URBAN CENTER SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA (SPA) PLAN AND ASSOCIATED REGULATORY DOCUMENTS RELATING TO MODIFICATIONS IN THE OVERALL BUILDOUT INTENSITY, BUILDING HEIGHTS AND DISTRICT 6 REGULATIONS D.ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND SLF IV - MILLENIA, LLC (FIRST READING) Development Services Department Department: The Director of Development Services has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the project was adequately covered in previously adopted Final Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern Urban Center (Millenia) Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan (FEIR 07-01) (SCH#2007041074). The Development Services Director has determined that only minor technical changes or additions to this document are necessary and that none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines calling for the preparation of a subsequent document have occurred; therefore, the Development Service Director has prepared an Addendum to FEIR 07-01. Environmental Notice: Council conduct the public hearing, place the ordinances on first reading and adopt the resolutions. Recommended Action: Page 6 City of Chula Vista Printed on 7/5/2018 July 10, 2018City Council Agenda ACTION ITEMS The Item(s) listed in this section of the agenda will be considered individually by the Council and are expected to elicit discussion and deliberation. If you wish to speak on any item, please fill out a “Request to Speak” form (available in the lobby) and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ADOPTING THE AGE-FRIENDLY CHULA VISTA ACTION PLAN 18-01529.18-0152 Development Services Department Department: The activity is not a "Project" as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required. Environmental Notice: Council adopt the resolution. Recommended Action: CITY MANAGER’S REPORTS MAYOR’S REPORTS Consideration of appointment of a voting delegate and alternates for the 2018 League of California Cities Annual Conference, to be held in Long Beach, September 12 through 14. 18-024310.18-0243 COUNCILMEMBERS’ COMMENTS COUNCILMEMBER AGUILAR: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA CALLING ON THE U.S. GOVERNMENT TO IMMEDIATELY REUNITE FAMILIES SEPARATED AT THE BORDER 18-030511.18-0305 Council adopt the resolution. Recommended Action: CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS Page 7 City of Chula Vista Printed on 7/5/2018 July 10, 2018City Council Agenda CLOSED SESSION Announcements of actions taken in Closed Session shall be made available by noon on Wednesday following the Council Meeting at the City Attorney’s office in accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act (Government Code 54957.7). CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6 Agency designated representatives: Gary Halbert, Glen Googins, Kelley Bacon, David Bilby, Courtney Chase, Ed Prendell and Simon Silva. Employee organization(s): Mid-Managers/Professional Association/Service Employees International Union, Local 221 (MM/PROF/SEIU) 18-028612.18-0286 CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 Property:318 4th Ave, Chula Vista, CA Agency Negotiators:Rick Ryals and Eric Crockett Negotiating Parties:City of Chula Vista and Heritage Group Under Negotiation:Price and Terms for Acquisition 18-030113.18-0301 ADJOURNMENT to the Regular City Council Meeting on July 17, 2018, at 5:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers. Materials provided to the City Council related to any open-session item on this agenda are available for public review at the City Clerk’s Office, located in City Hall at 276 Fourth Avenue, Building A, during normal business hours. In compliance with the AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT The City of Chula Vista requests individuals who require special accommodations to access, attend, and/or participate in a City meeting, activity, or service, contact the City Clerk’s Office at (619) 691-5041(California Relay Service is available for the hearing impaired by dialing 711) at least forty-eight hours in advance of the meeting. Most Chula Vista City Council meetings, including public comments, are video recorded and aired live on AT&T U-verse channel 99 (throughout the County), on Cox Cable channel 24 (only in Chula Vista), and online at www.chulavistaca.gov. Recorded meetings are also aired on Wednesdays at 7 p.m. (both channels) and are archived on the City's website. Page 8 City of Chula Vista Printed on 7/5/2018 City of Chula Vista Meeting Minutes - Draft 2:00 PM Council Chambers 276 4th Avenue, Building A Chula Vista, CA 91910 Tuesday, April 24, 2018 SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING JOINTLY WITH THE SAN DIEGO UNIFIED PORT DISTRICT BOARD OF PORT COMMISSIONERS CALL TO ORDER A special meeting of the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, meeting jointly with the San Diego Unified Port District Board of Port Commissioners was called to order at 2:01 p.m. in the Council Chambers, located in City Hall, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, California. ROLL CALL: Present:Councilmember Aguilar, Deputy Mayor Diaz, Councilmember McCann, Councilmember Padilla and Mayor Casillas Salas Councilmember McCann arrived at 2:02 p.m. Also Present: City Manager Halbert, City Attorney Googins, and City Clerk Bigelow PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG Port Commissioner Moore led the Pledge of Allegiance. PUBLIC COMMENTS JoAnn Fields, Chula Vista resident, spoke regarding Filipino -American Friendship Day and spoke in support of the Council and Port considering placing an item on a future agenda regarding the 2020 Census and formation of a complete count committee. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1.17-0216 A.RESOLUTION NO. 2018-057 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND AMONG THE SAN DIEGO UNIFIED PORT DISTRICT, THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, AND RIDA CHULA VISTA, LLC, FOR A HOTEL-CONVENTION CENTER PROJECT (CHULA VISTA BAYFRONT MASTER PLAN PARCEL H-3) INCLUDING A CONCEPTUAL PLAN OF FINANCE, CONTINGENT UPON FINAL CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF THE ASSOCIATED ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SUBSIDY TO RIDA CHULA VISTA, LLC Page 1City of Chula Vista April 24, 2018City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft B.RESOLUTION NO. 2018-058 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE REVENUE SHARING AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND THE SAN DIEGO UNIFIED PORT DISTRICT (CHULA VISTA BAYFRONT RESORT HOTEL AND CONVENTION CENTER AND RELATED INFRASTRUCTURE), CONTINGENT UPON FINAL CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF THE ASSOCIATED ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SUBSIDY TO RIDA CHULA VISTA, LLC C.RESOLUTION NO. 2018-059 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING AN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SUBSIDY REPORT REGARDING A HOTEL-CONVENTION CENTER PROJECT (CHULA VISTA BAYFRONT MASTER PLAN PARCEL H-3) Notice of the hearing was given in accordance with legal requirements, and the hearing was held on the date and no earlier than the time specified in the notice. Port District Clerk Donna Morales stated that revised disposition and development and revenue sharing agreements had been distributed. City Manager Halbert and Randa Coniglio, President /CEO of the San Diego Unified Port District, introduced the item. Stephanie Shook, Program Manager, San Diego Unified Port District, gave a presentation on the item. Ira Mitzner, President and CEO of RIDA Corporation, gave a presentation on the item. Mayor Casillas Salas opened the public hearing. The following members of the public spoke in support of staff's recommendation: -Jeff Phair, Chula Vista resident, representing the Phair Company -JoAnn Fields, Chula Vista resident -Cindy Gompper Graves, Chula Vista resident, along with members of the South County Economic Development Corporation The following members of the public submitted written documentation in support of staff's recommendation and declined to speak: -Patrice Milkovich, Chula Vista resident -Rich Stevenson, Chula Vista resident, representing Sweetwater Authority -Valerie Acevez -Karen Odermatt, Imperial Beach resident -Patty Alvarez, Imperial Beach resident -Adam Sparks -Kathy Sparks -Eric W. Washington -Ana Melgoza, Chula Vista resident -Susan Guerra -Susan Fuller -Lori Coons -Patricia E. Chavez, Chula Vista resident -Clarissa Falcon, Bonita resident -Pedro Anaya, Chula Vista resident Page 2City of Chula Vista April 24, 2018City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft -Bob Salomon, Chula Vista resident -Maggie Hannegan, San Diego resident -Jacqueline Reynoso, National City resident -Michelle Diaz Agha, Bonita resident -Sassan Rahimzadeh, Chula Vista resident Mayor announced that the public hearing would remain open until the regular meeting of the City Council at 5:00 p.m. that day. Councilmembers offered comments and asked clarifying questions. Councilmember Aguilar spoke in support of including "Chula Vista" in the name of the project. Adam Meyer, representing the San Diego Unified Port District, spoke regarding the anticipated groundbreaking of the project. A motion was made by Mayor Casillas Salas, seconded by Councilmember Padilla, to adopt Resolution Nos. 2018-057, 2018-058, and 2018-059, as revised and distributed to the Council, and to continue the public hearing to the regular City Council meeting at 5:00 p.m. that evening. The headings were read, text waived. The motion carried by the following vote: ACTION: Yes:Aguilar, Diaz, McCann, Padilla and Casillas Salas5 - No:0 Abstain:0 The Board of Port Commissioners took action on its respective agenda items. Port Commissioners offered comments regarding the project. ADJOURNMENT At 3:22 p.m., the meeting was adjourned to the Regular City Council Meeting on April 24, 2018, at 5:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers. _______________________________ Kerry K. Bigelow, MMC, City Clerk Page 3City of Chula Vista City of Chula Vista Meeting Minutes - Draft 5:00 PM Council Chambers 276 4th Avenue, Building A Chula Vista, CA 91910 Tuesday, April 24, 2018 REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Chula Vista was called to order at 5:05 p.m. in the Council Chambers, located in City Hall, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, California. ROLL CALL: Present:Councilmember Aguilar, Deputy Mayor Diaz, Councilmember McCann, Councilmember Padilla and Mayor Casillas Salas Councilmember Padilla arrived at 5:06 p.m. Also Present: City Manager Halbert, City Attorney Googins, City Clerk Bigelow, and Records Manager Turner PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG AND MOMENT OF SILENCE Deputy Mayor Diaz led the Pledge of Allegiance. SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY A.18-0007 PRESENTATION OF THE CLEAN CHAMPION AWARDS BY THE CHULA VISTA SUSTAINABILITY COMMISSION Chair Valen and members of the Sustainability Commission announced the Clean Champion award recipients and presented them with awards. B.18-0168 PRESENTATION OF A PROCLAMATION TO MIRELLA LOPEZ, FORMER EDITOR OF THE AWARD-WINNING SOUTHWESTERN COLLEGE SUN NEWSPAPER AND EL SOL MAGAZINE, IN RECOGNITION OF HER LEADERSHIP AS A STUDENT JOURNALIST Mayor Casillas Salas read the proclamation and Councilmember Aguilar presented it to Ms. Lopez. C.18-0173 PRESENTATION OF A PROCLAMATION PROCLAIMING APRIL 2018 AS FAIR HOUSING MONTH IN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA Mayor Casillas Salas read the proclamation and Deputy Mayor Diaz presented it to Sr. Managment Analyst Dorado. Page 1City of Chula Vista April 24, 2018City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft CONSENT CALENDAR (Items 1 - 6) 1.18-0169 APPROVAL OF MINUTES of December 12, 2017 at 5:00 p.m., December 19, 2017, and January 9, 2018. Recommended Action: Council approve the minutes. 2.18-0164 WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS A.Memorandum from Councilmember Aguilar requesting an excused absence from the March 27, 2018 council meeting. B.Letter of resignation from Steve Schoenerr, Historic Preservation Commission Recommended Action: Council excuse the absence and accept the resignation. 3.18-0165 A.ORDINANCE NO. 3423 OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE, SECTION 19.58.022 (ACCESSORY SECOND DWELLING UNITS); CHAPTER 19.04 (DEFINITIONS); CHAPTER 19.20 (AGRICULTURAL ZONE); CHAPTER 19.22 (RESIDENTIAL ESTATES ZONE); CHAPTER 19.24 (SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE ZONE); CHAPTER 19.26 (ONE- AND TWO-FAMILY RESIDENCE ZONE); CHAPTER 19.28 (APARTMENT RESIDENTIAL ZONE); AND CHAPTER 19.48 (PLANNED COMMUNITY ZONE) WITH REGARD TO ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS (SECOND READING AND ADOPTION) B.ORDINANCE NO. 3424 OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 3.32 (RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION TAX) TO EXEMPT ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS AND JUNIOR ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS FROM THE RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION TAX AND AMENDING CHAPTER 17.10 (PARKLANDS AND PUBLIC FACILITIES) TO WAIVE ASSESSMENT OF PARKLAND ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT FEES FOR ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS AND JUNIOR ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS (SECOND READING AND ADOPTION) Recommended Action: Council adopt the ordinances. 4.18-0030 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING CHAPTER 15.26 OF THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE TO INCREASE OUTDOOR LIGHTING EFFICIENCY FOR SPECIFIC COMMERCIAL OUTDOOR LIGHTING APPLICATIONS (FIRST READING) Recommended Action: Council place the ordinance on first reading. Page 2City of Chula Vista April 24, 2018City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft 5.18-0091 RESOLUTION NO. 2018-060 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ADOPTING A LIST OF PROJECTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018-19 FUNDED BY SB 1: THE ROAD REPAIR AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 2017 (RMRA) Recommended Action: Council adopt the resolution. 6.18-0102 RESOLUTION NO. 2018-061 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE EXISTING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA & T.Y. LIN INTERNATIONAL TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR THE WILLOW STREET BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT (CIP STL-261) Recommended Action: Council adopt the resolution. Approval of the Consent Calendar A motion was made by Councilmember McCann, seconded by Mayor Casillas Salas, to approve staff's recommendations on the above Consent Calendar items, headings read, text waived. The motion carried by the following vote: ACTION: Yes:Aguilar, Diaz, McCann, Padilla and Casillas Salas5 - No:0 Abstain:0 ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR There were none. PUBLIC COMMENTS Amane Kadoya, Chula Vista resident, spoke in opposition to off-shore drilling. Steven Pavka, Chula Vista resident, expressed concern regarding gun control. Page 3City of Chula Vista April 24, 2018City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft PUBLIC HEARINGS 7.18-0171 A.RESOLUTION NO. 2018-063 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND AMONG THE SAN DIEGO UNIFIED PORT DISTRICT, THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, AND RIDA CHULA VISTA, LLC, FOR A HOTEL-CONVENTION CENTER PROJECT (CHULA VISTA BAYFRONT MASTER PLAN PARCEL H-3) INCLUDING A CONCEPTUAL PLAN OF FINANCE B.RESOLUTION NO. 2018-064 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE REVENUE SHARING AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND THE SAN DIEGO UNIFIED PORT DISTRICT (CHULA VISTA BAYFRONT RESORT HOTEL AND CONVENTION CENTER AND RELATED INFRASTRUCTURE) C.RESOLUTION NO. 2018-062 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING AN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SUBSIDY TO RIDA CHULA VISTA, LLC, FOR A HOTEL-CONVENTION CENTER PROJECT (CHULA VISTA BAYFRONT MASTER PLAN PARCEL H-3) AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH (This item was continued from the City Council /San Diego Unified Port District Board Joint Meeting of April 24, 2018 at 2:00 p.m.) Notice of the hearing was given in accordance with legal requirements, and the hearing was held on the date and no earlier than the time specified in the notice. Economic Development Director Crockett, Assistant City Manager Kachadoorian, and Assistant Director of Development Services Allen gave a presentation on the item. Mary Casillas Salas had previously opened the public hearing at the 2:00 p.m. meeting on April 24, 2018. Patrice Milkovich, Chula Vista resident, submitted written documentation in support of staff's recommendation but was not present to speak when called. Lucelle Philips, Chula Vista resident, requested environmental impact information. Mayor Casillas Salas closed the public hearing. City Attorney Googins announced that a revised Revenue Sharing agreement and Disposition and Development agreement for Items 7A and 7B had been distributed to the Council and that action on the items would be with respect to the revised documents. Council discussion ensued. . Page 4City of Chula Vista April 24, 2018City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft A motion was made by Mayor Casillas Salas, seconded by Councilmember Padilla, to adopt Resolution Nos. 2018-063, 2018-064, and 2018-062, headings read, text waived. The motion carried by the following vote: ACTION: Yes:Aguilar, Diaz, McCann, Padilla and Casillas Salas5 - No:0 Abstain:0 CITY MANAGER’S REPORTS City Manager Halbert introduced Port Commissioner Ann Moore, who presented a report on the Chula Vista Bayfront activities. ACTION ITEMS 8.18-0143 PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION ON THE CITY’S FISCAL YEAR 2019 BASELINE BUDGET AND LONG-TERM FINANCIAL PLAN Budget & Analysis Manager Prendell and Director of Finance Bilby gave a presentation on the item. MAYOR’S REPORTS At the request of Mayor Casillas Salas, there was a consensus of the Council to consider a resolution in opposition to the Tax Fairness, Transparency and Accountability Act at an upcoming Council meeting. Mayor Casillas Salas reported on the upcoming opening of Heritage Road. COUNCILMEMBERS’ COMMENTS Councilmember McCann thanked the citizens that attended the coffee with a cop meeting. He also attended the ribbon cutting for California Coast Credit Union and a milestone service recoginition reception. Councilmember McCann stated another coffee with a cop meeting would be taking place at Gathering Grounds, and he spoke regarding the opening of Heritage Road. Councilmember Padilla stated he would be joining the Mayor at Veterans Park for an upcoming community coffee meeting. Councilmember Aguilar stated her office would be sponsoring a town hall dialoge regarding District 2 public safety staffing at Norman Park Senior Center. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS There were none. ADJOURNMENT At 7:03 p.m., the meeting was adjourned to the special City Council meeting on April 26, 2018, at 6:00 p.m., and thence to the regular City Council meeting on May 1, 2018, at 5:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers. _______________________________ Kerry K. Bigelow, MMC, City Clerk Page 5City of Chula Vista P a g e | 1 July 10, 2018 File ID: 18-0204 TITLE A. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA RECITING THE FACT OF THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD IN THIS CITY ON JUNE 5, 2018, DECLARING THE RESULTS THEREOF, AND OTHER MATTERS AS ARE PROVIDED BY LAW B. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA CALLING A SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 6, 2018, FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONDUCTING A RUNOFF ELECTION TO ELECT A MAYOR, TWO MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL, REPRESENTING DISTRICTS 1 AND 2, AND A CITY ATTORNEY; CONSOLIDATING THE ELECTION WITH THE STATEWIDE ELECTION; AND REQUESTING THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TO PERMIT THE REGISTRAR OF VOTERS TO PERFORM CERTAIN SERVICES FOR THE CONDUCT OF THE ELECTION C. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ADOPTING REGULATIONS FOR CANDIDATES FOR ELECTIVE OFFICE PERTAINING TO MATERIALS SUBMITTED TO THE ELECTORATE AT THE SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 6, 2018 RECOMMENDED ACTION Council adopt the resolutions. SUMMARY The Registrar of Voters has transmitted the certified results of the General Municipal Election held on June 5, 2018. Elections Code Section 10262(b) requires the City Clerk, as the City elections official, to certify the results of the election to the City Council, which shall adopt a resolution reciting the fact of the election. Adoption of the resolutions declares the results of the General Municipal Election; provides for a Special Municipal (Runoff) Election to elect a Mayor, two members of the City Council, representing Districts 1 and 2, and a City Attorney; and adopts regulations pertaining to materials prepared by candidatesfor the Special Election and the associated costs. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Director of Development Services has reviewed the proposed activity for compliance withthe California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that this activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines because it will not result in a physical change to the environment; P a g e | 2 therefore, pursuant to Section 15060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Thus, no environmental review is required. BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION Not applicable. DISCUSSION The General Municipal Election was held on June 5, 2018 to select a Mayor, one member of the City Council to represent District 2, eachfor a full term commencing in December 2018, and to submit one ballot measure (Measure A – Sales Tax ½ Cent) to the electorate. Certified results of the election are attached as Exhibit 1. Chula Vista Charter section 300(A) requires the two candidates receiving the highest and second highest number of votes for each office to participate in a Special (Runoff) Election to be held in November. The total number of votes received by each candidate and for Measure Ais listed below. The candidates who received the highest and second highest number of votes and who will participate in the Special Runoff Election in November are listed in bold. FOR MAYOR (four-year term): MARY CASILLAS SALAS 24,572 VOTES (62.48%) HECTOR RAUL GASTELUM 6,676 VOTES (16.98%) DANIEL SCHRECK 4,408 VOTES (11.21%) ARTHUR KENDE 3,547 VOTES (9.02%) FOR MEMBER OF THE CITY COUNCIL, DISTRICT 2 (four-year term) STEVE STENBERG 2,521 VOTES (25.80%) JILL M. GALVEZ 2,411 VOTES (24.67%) PATRICK MACFARLAND 1,798 VOTES (18.40%) STEVE CASTANEDA 1,399 VOTES (14.31%) JESSE NAVARRO 1,041 VOTES (10.65%) MAX ZAKER 579 VOTES (5.92%) YES NO MEASURE A (Sales Tax ½ Cent)21,126 VOTES (52.56%)19,070 (47.44%) Only two candidates for Member of the City Council, representing District 1, and two candidates for City Attorney submitted sufficient nomination papers and qualified for placement on the ballot. Pursuant to pursuant to Resolution No. 2018-055 and Chula Vista Charter section 300(A)(3), these two seats did not appear on the ballot for the General Municipal Election held in June and will instead be placed on the ballot for the Special Election to be held in November. Additionally, California Elections Code Section 13307 provides that the local agency must adopt regulations pertaining to the materials prepared by candidates and the costs thereof. Historically, the City has allowed each candidate to submit a candidate’s statement of no more than 200 words. Candidates who choose to file P a g e | 3 a candidate’s statement for the Special Runoff Election in November will be required to pay a deposit at the time their statements are filed with the City Clerk. Should the actual cost be less than the amount of the deposit, the balance will be refunded to the candidates; and should the actual cost be more, candidates will be billed for the difference. DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT Staff has reviewed the decision contemplated by this action and has determined that it is not site-specific and consequently, the 500-foot rule found in California Code of Regulations Title 2, section 18702.2(a)(11), is not applicable to this decision for purposes of determining a disqualifying real property-related financial conflict of interest under the Political Reform Act (Cal. Gov't Code § 87100, et seq.). Staff is not independently aware, and has not been informed by any City Councilmember, of any other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter. LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS The City’s Strategic Plan has five major goals: Operational Excellence, Economic Vitality, Healthy Community, Strong and Secure Neighborhoods and a Connected Community. Serving as the elections official and managing the elections process, which forms the foundation of our democratic system of government, is one of the primary functions of the City Clerk. While this process is not specifically associated with one of the City’s strategic goals, carryingout this important function in an ethical, impartial, transparent manner aligns with the City’s goals of Operational Excellence and Connected Community. CURRENT-YEAR FISCAL IMPACT The Fiscal Year 2019 general fund budget includes $130,000 to conduct the Special Election for the four seats: Mayor, two members of the City Council, theCity Attorney. Staff anticipates the budgeted funds will be sufficient for this purpose. ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT There is no ongoing fiscal impact. ATTACHMENTS Exhibit 1 - Certified results of the June 5, 2018 election Staff Contact: Kerry Bigelow, City Clerk Resolution A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA RECITING THE FACT OF THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD IN THIS CITY ON JUNE 5, 2018, DECLARING THE RESULTS THEREOF, AND OTHER MATTERS AS ARE PROVIDED BY LAW THIS ATTACHMENT WILL BE PROVIDED AS IT BECOMES AVAILABLE Exhibit 1 to Resolution A - Certified election results THIS ATTACHMENT WILL BE PROVIDED AS IT BECOMES AVAILABLE C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@D01D861C\@BCL@D01D861C.docx RESOLUTION NO. __________ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA CALLING A SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 6, 2018, FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONDUCTING A RUNOFF ELECTION TO ELECT A MAYOR, TWO MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL, REPRESENTING DISTRICTS 1 AND 2, AND A CITY ATTORNEY; CONSOLIDATING THE ELECTION WITH THE STATEWIDE ELECTION; AND REQUESTING THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TO PERMIT THE REGISTRAR OF VOTERS TO PERFORM CERTAIN SERVICES FOR THE CONDUCT OF THE ELECTION WHEREAS, in accordance with the provisions of the Chula Vista Charter and State law, a special municipal election shall be held on November 6, 2018 for the purpose of electing a Mayor, two members of the City Council to represent Districts 1 and 2, and a City Attorney, each for the full term of four years, commencing in December 2018; and WHEREAS, Section 439.1 of the Administrative Code of the County of San Diego authorizes the Registrar of Voters of the County of San Diego to render specified services relating to the conduct of an election to any city or district that has, by resolution, requested the Board of Supervisors to permit the Registrar to render the services, subject to requirements set forth in that section; and WHEREAS, Elections Code section 10403 requires the City Council to adopt a resolution requesting the Board of Supervisors to consolidate Chula Vista’s election with the statewide general election and to permit the Registrar of Voters to perform certain services in conjunction with the City’s election; and WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the proposed activity for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that this activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines because it will not result in a physical change to the environment; therefore, pursuant to Section 15060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the actions proposed are not subject to CEQA. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista as follows: SECTION 1. All of the foregoing recitals are true and correct. SECTION 2. Pursuant to the requirements of the Chula Vista Charter and the laws of the State of California, there shall be and there is hereby called and ordered held in the City of Chula Vista, California, on Tuesday, November 6, 2018, a special municipal election of the qualified electors of the City for the purpose of electing a Mayor, two members of the City Council to represent Districts 1 and 2, and a City Attorney, each for a full term of four years, commencing in December 2018. SECTION 3. Pursuant to Elections Code section 10403, the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Diego is hereby requested to permit the Registrar of Voters to perform and render all services and proceedings, and to procure and furnish any and all official ballots, notices, printed matter and all supplies and equipment and paraphernalia incidental to and connected with the conduct of the subject election of the City of Chula Vista, with the cooperation and assistance of the City Clerk of Chula Vista, in order to properly and lawfully conduct such election. SECTION 4. The Board of Supervisors of the County of San Diego is hereby requested to consolidate this election with the statewide election to be held on the same day, in the same territory. Pursuant to sections 10411 and 10418 of the Elections Code, (a) the election shall be held in all respects as if there were only one election; (b) only one form of ballot shall be used; and (c) the Registrar of Voters of the County of San Diego shall canvass the returns of the subject election as part of the canvass of the returns of the election consolidated hereby. SECTION 5. Pursuant to sections 10410 and 10418 of the Elections Code within the territories affected by this consolidation, the election precincts, polling places, voting booths and polling hours shall, in every case, be the same, and there shall be only one set of election officers in each of the precincts. SECTION 6. The County of San Diego shall be reimbursed in full for the services performed by the Registrar of Voters for the City of Chula Vista upon presentation of a bill therefor, and this City agrees to indemnify and save free and harmless the County, its officers, agents and employees from expense or liability, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, as a result of an election contest arising after conduct of this election. SECTION 7.The City Clerk is hereby directed to forthwith file a certified copy of this resolution with the Board of Supervisors and the Registrar of Voters of the County of San Diego and to issue instructions to the Registrar of Voters to take any and all steps necessary for the holding of the election. SECTION 8. The polls of said election shall be open at seven o’clock a.m. of the day of said election and shall remain open continuously from that time until eight o’clock p.m. of the same day when said polls shall be closed, except as provided in section 14401 of the Elections Code of the State of California. SECTION 9. The ballots to be used at said election shall be, both as to form and matter contained therein, such as may be required by law to be used thereat. SECTION 10. In all particulars not recited in this resolution, said election shall be held and conducted as provided by law for holding municipal elections in this City. Resolution No. _________ Page 3 SECTION 11. Notice of the time and place of holding this election is hereby given and the City Clerk is hereby authorized, instructed and directed to give such further or additional notice of said election in time, form and manner as required by law. SECTION 12. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution and file it with the City’s original resolutions. Presented by Kerry K. Bigelow, MMC City Clerk Approved as to form by Glen R. Googins City Attorney RESOLUTION NO. __________ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ADOPTING REGULATIONS FOR CANDIDATES FOR ELECTIVE OFFICE PERTAINING TO MATERIALS SUBMITTED TO THE ELECTORATE AT THE SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 6, 2018 WHEREAS, Section 13307 of the Elections Code of the State of California allows each candidate for elective office to prepare a candidate’s statement of no more than 200 words, on a form provided by the elections official; and WHEREAS, Section 13307 requires the elections official to include the written candidates in the voter information guide, with a Spanish translation in some instances; and WHEREAS, Section 13307 permits the governing body of any local agency to estimate the total cost of printing, handling, translating, mailing, and electronically distributing these candidates’ statements, and to require each candidate filing such a statement to pay in advance his or her estimated pro rata share as a condition of having his or her statement included in the voter’s pamphlet. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista as follows: SECTION 1. Pursuant to section 13307 of the Elections Code of the State of California, each candidate for elective office running in the Special Municipal Election to be held in the City of Chula Vista on Tuesday, November 6, 2018, may prepare a candidate’s statement on an appropriate form provided by the City Clerk. The statement may include the name, age and occupation of the candidate and a brief description of no more than 200 words of the candidate’s education and qualifications expressed by the candidate himself or herself. The statement shall not include the party affiliation of the candidate nor membership or activity in partisan political organizations. Additionally, the statement shall be limited to the candidate’s own personal background and qualifications, and shall not in any way make reference, directly or indirectly, to other candidates for that office or to another candidate’s qualifications, character, or activities. The statement shall be filed in the Office of the City Clerk no sooner than Monday, July 16, 2018 and no later than Friday, August 10, 2018. The statement may be withdrawn, but not changed, during the stated period and until 5:00 p.m. on Monday, August 13, 2018. SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall estimate the total cost of printing, handling, translating, and mailing the candidates’ statements filed pursuant to the Elections Code, including costs incurred as a result of complying with the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (as amended), and require each candidate filing a statement to pay in advance his or her estimated pro rata share as a condition of having his or her statement included in the voter’s pamphlet.The estimate shall be an approximation of the actual cost and may be significantly more or less than the estimate. Accordingly, the City is not bound by the estimate and may, on a pro rata basis, bill each candidate for additional actual expense or refund any excess paid depending on the final actual cost. SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall provide each candidate, or the candidate’s representative, a copy of this Resolution. SECTION 4. No candidate will be permitted to include additional materials in the sample ballot package. Presented by Kerry K. Bigelow, MMC City Clerk Approved as to form by Glen R. Googins City Attorney P a g e | 1 July 10, 2018 File ID: 18-0264 TITLE A. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND COLE & ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR THE PREPARATION OF A PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIVITY AND INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT PLAN AND APPROPRIATING $27,800 FROM THE AVAILABLE BALANCE OF THE TRANSNET FUND TO CIP GGV0222(4/5 VOTE REQUIRED) B. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROPRIATING $40,000 FROM THE AVAILABLE BALANCE OF THE SEWER FACILITY REPLACEMENT FUND TO CIP SWR0278 (4/5 VOTE REQUIRED) RECOMMENDED ACTION Council adopt the resolutions. SUMMARY On August 9, 2016, the City entered into an agreement with Cole & Associates, Inc. for the preparation of a Pedestrian Connectivity and Infrastructure Improvement Plan. In order to finalize the plan, staff recommends that the agreement be amended to adjust the scope of work. Also on August 9, 2016, the City awarded a construction contract with Just Construction, Inc. for the Max Field Pump Station Reconstruction Project, CIP SWR0278. Due to unforeseen conditions and design revisions, staff recommends appropriating additional funds to complete the project. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The proposed activity has been reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and it has been determined that the activity qualifies for an Exemption pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 Class 1 (Existing Facilities) and/or Section 15061(b)(3), because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment. Thus, no further environmental review is required. BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION Not applicable P a g e | 2 DISCUSSION RESOLUTION A Council Resolution 2016-165 approved the agreement between the City of Chula Vista and Cole & Associates, Inc. for the preparation of the Pedestrian Connectivity and Infrastructure Improvement Plan (Pedestrian Connectivity Plan). The main objectives of the plan are to evaluate all City sidewalks and ramps, and develop prioritized recommendations for repair and improvements. The contract agreement was in the amount of $443,230.34 and included the followingitems of work: •Survey data for all sidewalks and pedestrian ramps within the City, including signalized intersections. •Evaluation of pedestrian facilities at traffic signals •Prioritization, preliminary cost estimates, and a recommended maintenance/improvement program •Preparation of a Pedestrian Connectivity Plan and Compliance Report •A series of three public meetings in different areas of the City and a presentation to Council for approval •Integration of inspection data into the City’s Geographic Information System (GIS) and Lucity software •Training for City staff in using the new database, updating cost tables, and evaluating project feasibility To complete the listed scope in the contract agreement, additional work was required to finalize the formatting of the Compliance Report and to complete the integration of the inspection data into the City’s GIS and Lucity databases. To complete these revised items of work, City staff recommends approving the amendment to the agreement/contract (Attachment #1) and appropriating $27,800 in TransNet funds into the CIP budget. RESOLUTION B Council Resolution 2016-167 awarded a construction contract to Just Construction, Inc. for the Max Field Pump Station Reconstruction Project, CIP SWR0278. The Max Field Pump Station serves the Max Field – Rienstra Park Little League baseball fields. CIP SWR0278 includes construction of a new sewage pump station, replacing the appurtenant gravity and force main pipelines, and abandoning the existing sewage pump station. During construction, the contractor encountered site conditions that were different from those shown on the construction plans. This resulted in a series of design changes including: a deeper sewage holding tank (wet well); larger pumps and associated piping; larger electrical breakers; revised wiring and additional coordination with San Diego Gas and Electric. These design changes resulted in additional cost and delays to the construction work beyond what was included in the original construction contract. The contractor submitted a claim for additional costs associated with the delays. City staff reviewed the documents provided by the contractor and the contract records. Based on the review and further negotiations with the contractor, an agreement was reached. An appropriation of $40,000 is needed to cover the negotiated settlement and complete the project. P a g e | 3 DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT RESOLUTION A Staff has reviewed the decision contemplated by this action and has determined that it is not site-specific and consequently, the 500-foot rule found in California Code of Regulations Title 2, section 18702.2(a)(11), is not applicable to this decision for purposes of determining a disqualifying real property-related financial conflict of interest under the Political Reform Act (Cal. Gov't Code § 87100, et seq.). Staff is not independently aware, and has not been informed by any City Council member, of any other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter. RESOLUTION B Staff has reviewed the property holdings of the City Council members and has found no property holdings within 500 feet of the boundaries of the property which is the subject of this action. Consequently, this item does not present a disqualifying real property-related financial conflict of interest under California Code of Regulations Title 2, section 18702.2(a)(11), for purposes of the Political Reform Act (Cal. Gov’t Code §87100,et seq.). Staff is not independently aware, and has not been informed by any City Council member, of any other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter. LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS The City’s Strategic Plan has five major goals: Operational Excellence, Economic Vitality, Healthy Community, Strong and Secure Neighborhoods and a Connected Community. The goal of the Pedestrian Connectivity and Infrastructure Improvement Plan is to support the Strong and Secure Neighborhood Strategy. It will guide City staff in preparing programs for the maintenance and rehabilitation of the City’s sidewalks, thereby providing a safe and efficient roadway system for residents, businesses and visitors. CURRENT-YEAR FISCAL IMPACT RESOLUTION A Approval of the resolution will appropriate $27,800 from the TransNet fund to GGV0222. Sufficient TransNet funds are available; therefore, no additional impacts to the fund. RESOLUTION B Approval of the resolution will appropriate $40,000 from the Sewer Facilities Replacement fund to SWR0278. Sufficient Sewer Facilities Replacement funds are available; therefore, no additional impacts to the fund. ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT Upon completion of the CIP projects, the improvements will require only routine maintenance. ATTACHMENTS 1. COLE & ASSOCIATES, INC. CONTRACT AMENDMENT (dated April 13, 2018) Staff Contact: Patrick Moneda, Senior Civil Engineer RESOLUTION NO. __________ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND COLE & ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR THE PREPARATION OF A PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIVITY AND INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT PLAN AND APPROPRIATING $27,800 FROM THE AVAILABLE BALANCE OF THE TRANSNET FUND TO CIP GGV0222 WHEREAS, Council Resolution 2016-165 approved the agreement between the City of Chula Vista and Cole & Associates, Inc. for the preparation of the Pedestrian Connectivity and Infrastructure Improvement Plan; and WHEREAS, the main objectives of the plan are to evaluate all City sidewalks and ramps, and develop prioritized recommendations for repairs and improvements; and WHEREAS, the agreement was in the amount of $443,230.34; and WHEREAS, additional work was required to finalize the formatting of the Compliance Report and to complete the integration of the inspection data into the City’s GIS and Lucity databases; and WHEREAS, to complete the revised scope of work, City staff recommends approving the amendment to the agreement increasing the agreement amount by $27,800 and appropriating $27,800 in TransNet funds into the CIP budget. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, that it approves an amendment to an agreement between the City of Chula Vista and Cole & Associates, Inc. for the preparation of a Pedestrian Connectivity and Infrastructure Improvement Plan to increase the agreement amount by $27,800, in the form presented, with such minor modifications as may be required or approved by the City Attorney, a copy of which shall be kept on file in the Office of the City Clerk, and authorizes and directs the City Manager, or designee, to execute same. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, that it appropriates $27,800 from the available balance of the TransNet fund to CIP GGV0222. Presented by Approved as to form by William S. Valle Glen R. Googins Director of Engineering &City Attorney Capital Projects RESOLUTION NO. __________ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROPRIATING $40,000 FROM THE AVAILABLE BALANCE OF THE SEWER FACILITY REPLACEMENT FUND TO CIP SWR0278 WHEREAS, Council Resolution 2016-167 awarded a construction contract to Just Construction, Inc. for the Max Field Pump Station Reconstruction Project, CIP SWR0278; and WHEREAS, the project includes construction of a new sewage pump station, replacing the appurtenant gravity and force main pipelines, and abandoning the existing sewage pump station; and WHEREAS, design changes resulted in additional cost and delays to the construction work beyond what was included in the original construction contract; and WHEREAS, the contractor submitted a claim for additional costs associated with the delays; and WHEREAS, the contractor and staff negotiated a sum to fully resolve contractor’s claim; and WHEREAS, staff recommends appropriating $40,000 to cover the negotiated settlement sum and complete the project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, that it appropriate $40,000 from the available balance of the Sewer Facility Replacement Fund to CIP SWR0278. Presented by Approved as to form by William S. Valle Glen R. Googins Director of Engineering &City Attorney Capital Projects P a g e | 1 July 10, 2018 File ID: 18-0268 TITLE RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA CONSENTING TO THE RELINQUISHMENT OF THE PROPERTY SEGMENTS INCLUDING ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS AS DESCRIBED ON RELINQUISHMENT MAP R34590 BY ACTION OF THE CALIFORNIA TRANSPORATION COMMISSION RECOMMENDED ACTION Council adopt the resolution. SUMMARY California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) recently completed the Interstate 805 East Palomar Street Direct Access Ramp (DAR), Park and Ride Lot, and Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Stop Project. A portion of this project included roadway improvements to Raven Avenue and East Palomar Street. Caltrans intends to relinquish the property rights and roadway improvements for ownership and maintenance to the City. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Director of Development Services has reviewed the proposed activity for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines because it will not result in a physical change in the environment; therefore, pursuant to Section 15060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the activity is not subject to CEQA. In addition, notwithstanding the foregoing, the Director of Development Services has also determined that the “Project” qualifies for an Exemption pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines. Thus, no environmental review is required. BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION Not applicable. DISCUSSION Caltrans and San Diego Association of Governments (Sandag) have coordinated with the City of Chula Vista in planning and recently completing construction of the DAR Project at Palomar Street and I-805. This project promotes ride sharing as the DAR is restricted to only High Occupancy Vehicles and the BRT. The P a g e | 2 project included construction of two Park and Ride lots on the northeast side of the DAR which will accommodate 336 parking spaces. The project also includes a BRT stop where travelers can transfer from one transportation mode to another. The BRT project is currently under construction and expected to open in late 2019. In order to build the DAR, Park and Ride lots, and BRT Stop, Caltrans acquired property from a number of residential owners as well as San Diego Gas & Electric. Some of the improvements modified portions of City streets and landscape features. Caltrans would like to convey ownership of the property foot print that falls outside the operational needs of the state highway. Ownership would be conveyed to the City and Metropolitan Transit System (MTS) for the purposes of operating the local streets and the Park and Ride lots respectively. Six individual segments of property along East Palomar Street and Raven Avenue are identified on Relinquishment Map R34590 (Attachment 1) for conveyance to the City. Two individual segments are identified on Relinquishment Map R34612 (Attachment 2) for conveyance to MTS. Section 73 of the California Streets and Highways Code governs that relinquishments are made by resolution of the California Transportation Commission (CTC). It further requires Caltrans to give 90 days’ notice in writing of intention to relinquish to the City Council. Caltrans and MTS have coordinated with the City to jointly define the segments depicted on the Relinquishment Maps for conveyance. Caltrans is preparing a relinquishment resolution for consideration by the CTC. Caltrans has requestedthat City Council pass a resolution consenting to the relinquishment, authorizing the City Clerk to accept the property and waiving the 90 days’ noticing requirement of Section 73 of the California Streets and Highways Code. With Council’s approval, Caltrans will then go before the CTC to complete the relinquishment process. Caltrans has already transferred operational and maintenance responsibilities to the City and MTS. City and MTS staff are developing a Landscape Maintenance Agreement (LMA) that defines areas of responsibility between MTS and the City for the newly landscaped areas. Once completed, city staff will bring the LMA to the City Council for approval. If needed, the City may issue MTS a temporary encroachment permit to maintain their landscaping within the City right of way until the LMA is executed. DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT Staff has reviewed the property holdings of the City Council members and has found no property holdings within 500 feet of the boundaries of the property which is the subject of this action. Consequently, this item does not present a disqualifying real property-related financial conflict of interest under California Code of Regulations Title 2, section 18702.2(a)(11), for purposes of the Political Reform Act (Cal. Gov’t Code §87100,et seq.). Staff is not independently aware, and has not been informed by any City Council member, of any other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter. P a g e | 3 LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS The City’s Strategic Plan has five major goals: Operational Excellence, Economic Vitality, Healthy Community, Strong and Secure Neighborhoods and a Connected Community. This relinquishment supports the Connected Community goal as it seeks to connect existing City local streets with adjacent improvements. The recent completion of the DAR project at Palomar Street and I-805 connects City streets with MTS facilities and the state highway system. CURRENT-YEAR FISCAL IMPACT There is no impact to the General Fund as a result of this action. ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT All costs associated with the maintenance of these improvements will be funded through a combination of revenues the City receives from the Federal and State Gas Taxes and the Sandag Transnet Sales Tax. A portion of the landscaping improvements will be maintained by the already established Open Space District 7. ATTACHMENTS 1. Relinquishment Map Number R34690 2. Relinquishment Map Number R34612 Staff Contact: Rosina Constanza, Senior Civil Engineer, Engineering and Capital Projects Department RESOLUTION NO. __________ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA CONSENTING TO THE RELINQUISHMENT OF THE PROPERTY SEGMENTS INCLUDING ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS AS DESCRIBED ON RELINQUISHMENT MAP R34590 BY ACTION OF THE CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION WHEREAS, California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and San Diego Association of Governments have coordinated with the City of Chula Vista in planning and recently completing construction of the Direct Access Ramp (DAR) Project at Palomar Street and Interstate 805; and WHEREAS, portions of this project included roadway improvements outside the operational needs of the state highway. Caltrans intends to relinquish the property rights and roadway improvements for ownership and maintenance to the City; and WHEREAS, six individual segments of property along East Palomar Street and Raven Avenue are identified on Relinquishment Map R34590 for conveyance to the City; and WHEREAS, Section 73 of the California Streets and Highways Code governs that relinquishments are made by resolution of the California Transportation Commission (CTC). It further requires Caltrans to give 90 days written notice to the City Council of its intention to relinquish; and WHEREAS, Caltrans is preparing a relinquishment resolution for consideration by the CTC and has requested that City Council pass a resolution consenting to the relinquishment, authorizing the City Clerk to accept the property, and waiving the 90 days’ notice requirement of Section 73 of the California Streets and Highways Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, that it consents to the relinquishment of the property segments including roadway improvements as described on Relinquishment Map R34590 by action of the California Transportation Commission. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, that it waives the 90 days’ notice requirement of Section 73 of the California Streets and Highways Code. Presented by Approved as to form by William S. Valle Glen R. Googins Director of Engineering &City Attorney Capital Projects/City Engineer P a g e | 1 July 10, 2018 File ID: 18-0282 TITLE RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING THE AUTHORIZED POSITION COUNT IN THE POLICE DEPARTMENT WITH NO NET INCREASE IN AUTHORIZED STAFFING AND APPROPRIATING $43,505 IN PERSONNEL AND REVENUES IN THE FY19 POLICE GRANTS SECTION OF THE FEDERAL GRANTS FUND RECOMMENDED ACTION Council adopt the resolution. SUMMARY The San Diego/Imperial High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas (SDI HIDTA) and San Diego Law Enforcement Coordination Center (SDLECC) request to reclassify one FA Program Assistant to FA Senior Program Assistant, one FA Analyst to FA Intelligence Analyst, and one FA Senior Intelligence Analyst to FA Supervisory Intelligence Analyst and appropriating $43,505 to the Personnel and corresponding Revenue portions of the Police Grants Section of the Federal Grants Fund in Fiscal Year 2019 (effective July 1, 2018). These positions are fully reimbursed by grant funds, along with a 4% (SDLECC Program) and 5% (SDI HIDTA Program) administrative fee for acting as the fiscal agent. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Director of Development Services has reviewed the proposed activity for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines because it will not result in a physical change in the environment; therefore, pursuant to Section 15060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Thus, no environmental review is required. BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION Not Applicable DISCUSSION The Police Department acts as the fiscal agent for various law enforcement programs which are funded through various State and Federal agencies. As the fiscal agent, the Police Department hires and provides salary and benefits for positions which are normally considered separate from existing City staffing. These positions are designated as “FA” (Fiscal Agent) in the title description. P a g e | 2 One FA Program Assistant is requested to be reclassified to FA Senior Program Assistant and One FA Analyst to FA Intelligence Analyst. Both positions are located at the San Diego Law Enforcement Center (SDLECC) and are funded by Department of Homeland Security grant funds. Over the years the responsibilities of both positions have increased significantly to the point where they need to be reclassified to the next level. One FA Senior Intelligence Analyst is requested to be reclassified to FA Supervisory Intelligence Analyst, currently located at the Imperial Valley Law Enforcement Center (IVLECC). This position is currently funded with HIDTA funds, and is requested to be reclassified due to the crucial oversight required by the IVLECC Intelligence arena for the SDI HIDTA. In an effort to address the needs of various departments and the City’s workforce, the Police Department is proposing the reclassification of certain positions. The following identifies the affected positions and proposed changes: DEPARTMENT POSITION TITLE FTE Police FA Program Assistant -1 FA Senior Program Assistant 1 Police FA Analyst -1 FA Intelligence Analyst 1 Police FA Senior Intelligence Analyst -1 FA Supervisory Intelligence Analyst 1 DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT Staff has reviewed the decision contemplated by this action and has determined that it is not site-specific and consequently, the 500-foot rule found in California Code of Regulations Title 2, section 18702.2(a)(11), is not applicable to this decision for purposes of determining a disqualifying real property-related financial conflict of interest under the Political Reform Act (Cal. Gov't Code § 87100, et seq.). Staff is not independently aware, and has not been informed by any City Council member, of any other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter. LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS The City’s Strategic Plan has five major goals: Operational Excellence, Economic Vitality, Healthy Community, Strong and Secure Neighborhoods and a Connected Community. Amending the City’s P a g e | 3 compensation schedule supports the goal of Operational Excellence by complying with the grant policies of these positions. CURRENT-YEAR FISCAL IMPACT Approval of the resolution will result in the reclassification one FA Program Assistant to a FA Senior Program Assistant, one FA Analyst to a FA Intelligence Analyst, and one FA Senior Intelligence Analyst to FA Supervisory Intelligence Analyst. These positions are budgeted in the Federal Grants Fund. There is no net fiscal impact for these reclassifications, because each position expense is offset by revenues for each grant funded position for a total of $43,505 in Fiscal Year 2019. ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT The City is fully reimbursed for Homeland Security and SDI HIDTA funded positions and receives a 4% and 5% administrative fee to act as a fiscal agent. The costs of the compensation adjustments for these positions will be completely offset with grant revenues, resulting in no ongoing fiscal impact. ATTACHMENTS None Staff Contact: Maritza Vargas, Police Department RESOLUTION NO. __________ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING THE AUTHORIZED POSITION COUNT IN THE POLICE DEPARTMENT WITH NO NET INCREASE IN AUTHORIZED STAFFING AND APPROPRIATING $43,505 IN PERSONNEL AND REVENUES IN THE FY19 POLICE GRANTS SECTION OF THE FEDERAL GRANTS FUND WHEREAS, the Police Department acts as the fiscal agent for various law enforcement programs, which are funded through various State and Federal agencies; and WHEREAS, the Police Department hires and provides salary and benefits for fiscal agent positions, and these positions are designated as “FA” (Fiscal Agent) in the title description; and WHEREAS, one FA Program Assistant is requested to be reclassified to FA Senior Program Assistant, one FA Analyst to FA Intelligence Analyst, and one FA Senior Intelligence Analyst to FA Supervisory Intelligence Analyst; and WHEREAS, these positions are fully reimbursed by grant funds, and the City receives a 4% to 5% administrative fee for acting as the fiscal agent. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, that it amends the authorized position count in the Police Department – reclassifying one FA Program Assistant to FA Senior Program Assistant, one FA Analyst to FA Intelligence Analyst, one FA Senior Intelligence Analyst to FA Supervisory Intelligence Analyst – with no net increase in authorized staffing. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, that it appropriates $43,505 to the Personnel and Revenue categories of the Police Grants Section of the Federal Grants Fund. Presented by Approved as to form by Roxana Kennedy Glen R. Googins Police Chief City Attorney P a g e | 1 July 10, 2018 File ID: 18-XXXX TITLE RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA SUPPORTING THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA’S APPLICATION FOR THE AMERICAN CITIES CLIMATE CHALLENGE GRANT. RECOMMENDED ACTION Council adopt the resolution. SUMMARY The City of Chula Vista’s Economic Development Department, Office of Sustainability, is submitting an application for the American Cities Climate Challenge (ACCC). This grant is offered by the Bloomberg Philanthropies. 20 selected cities will receive a robust technical assistance and support package valued at more than $2 million per city. The application submittal deadline is July 18, 2018. Staff is requesting Council approval of a resolution supporting the grant application. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required. The Director of Development Services has reviewed the proposed activity for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines because it will not result in a physical change in the environment; therefore, pursuant to Section 15060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Thus, no environmental review is required. BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION Not applicable. DISCUSSION Through the American Cities Climate Challenge, Bloomberg Philanthropies will provide extensive support and resources to the 20 American cities most committed and best positioned to reduce climate pollution in the United States. P a g e | 2 The American Cities Climate Challenge is open to the 100 most populous cities in America according to the 2010 census. This two-part competitive application process will help Bloomberg Philanthropies select the 20 cities— the “Leadership Cities”—most likely to lead America forward on climate. Cities will be evaluated on three criteria: Commitment, Ambition and Impact. The 20 selected cities will receive a robust technical assistance and support package valued at more than $2 million per city to work on buildings and transportation. Eligible cities must submit an application by July 18 and the 20 Leadership Cities will be announced in the fall. DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT Staff has reviewed the decision contemplated by this action and has determined that it is not site-specific and consequently, the 500-foot rule found in California Code of Regulations Title 2, section 18702.2(a)(11), is not applicable to this decision for purposes of determining a disqualifying real property-related financial conflict of interest under the Political Reform Act (Cal. Gov't Code § 87100, et seq.). Staff is not independently aware, and has not been informed by any City Council member, of any other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter. LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS The City’s Strategic Plan has five major goals: Operational Excellence, Economic Vitality, Healthy Community, Strong and Secure Neighborhoods and a Connected Community. This grant supports the healthy community goal by helping to support implementation of the 2017 Climate Action Plan (CAP) and carbon reducing strategies. CURRENT-YEAR FISCAL IMPACT The City is applying for the American Cities Climate Challenge grant. There is no current-year fiscal impact. ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT There is no ongoing fiscal impact at this time. ATTACHMENTS None. Staff Contact: Dennis Gakunga, Chief Sustainability Officer RESOLUTION NO. __________ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA SUPPORTING THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA’S APPLICATION FOR THE AMERICAN CITIES CLIMATE CHALLENGE GRANT WHEREAS, the City of Chula Vista is a nationally-recognized leader in working with our residents, communities and regional partners to implement initiatives and actions to address the threat of climate change to the local community; and WHEREAS, on September 26, 2017, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista adopted the 2017 Climate Action Plan (CAP) and directed staff to work with community partners to implement CAP actions and return to Council with regular progress reports; and WHEREAS, the adopted 2017 Climate Action Plan incorporated greenhouse gas reduction strategies that were recommended by the Climate Change Working Group (CCWG) which represented Chula Vista residents, business, non-profit, education, and utilities; and WHEREAS, the adopted 2017 Climate Action Plan focuses on water conservation and reuse, renewable and efficient energy, zero waste, and smart growth and transportation; and WHEREAS, fully implementing the actions in the adopted 2017 Climate Action Plan is anticipated to reduce 2020 greenhouse gas emissions by over two hundred thousand metric tons and help the City meet the State of California greenhouse gas reduction goals; and WHEREAS, on June 19, 2018, Bloomberg Philanthropies announced application invitations for the American Cities Climate Challenge grant to the 100 most populous cities in America according to the 2010 census; and WHEREAS, The American Cities Climate Challenge grant will provide 20 winning cities with critical resources and technical support to help meet climate goals; and WHEREAS, The American Cities Climate Challenge is an excellent opportunity for the City of Chula Vista to accelerate the City’s on-going climate action planning efforts; and WHEREAS, the evaluation criteria to determine the 20 winning cities of the American Cities Climate Challenge will focus on demonstrated Commitment, Ambition and Impact; and WHEREAS, the City of Chula Vista’s 20-year history as a leader in climate action planning in the region is a clear demonstration of the City’s commitment to sustainability and fighting the effects of climate change in our community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, that it supports the City of Chula Vista’s application for the American Cities Climate Challenge grant. Presented by Approved as to form by Eric C. Crockett Glen R. Googins Director of Economic Development City Attorney P a g e | 1 July 10, 2018 File ID: 18-0175 TITLE ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ADDINGCHAPTER 19.100 TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADOPT AND ESTABLISH AN URBAN AGRICULTURE INCENTIVE ZONE RECOMMENDED ACTION Council conduct the public hearing and place the ordinance on first reading. SUMMARY The State of California passed Assemby Bill (“AB”) 551 in 2013 to allow jurisdictions to create Urban Agriculture Incentive Zones (“UAIZ”). UAIZ’s provide a tax incentive (by reducing property taxes) for landowners to use their vacant or blighted property for agricultural purposes for a minimum of five years. This is an effort to use otherwise vacant land, while creating an added benefit for the community. On November 7, 2017, Council authorized staff to initiate the process for UAIZ adoption with the County, whom provides first approval as the tax assessor (see City Council Resolution No. 17-198, Attachment 1). The County approved the Chula Vista UAIZ on May 15, 2018 (see County Board of Supervisors Resolution No. 18-062, Attachment 2). Therefore, staff is bringing documents related to this item back to City Council for final approval. City staff has reached out to potentially impacted taxing entities regarding the possible effects of the UAIZ and has received no substantial questions, comment or concerns from these parties. Tonight’s action would establish the UAIZ within Chula Vista City limits by adding Chapter 19.100 to the Municipal Code (“CVMC”). ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the activity qualifies for an Exemption pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines. Environmental Determination The proposed activity has been reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and it has been determined that the activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the state CEQA Guidelines because the activity is voluntary and does not involve any commitment to any specific P a g e | 2 project that may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment. Therefore, pursuant to Section 15060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Thus, no environmental review is required. Although environmental review is not required at this time, once the scope of potential individual projects has been defined, environmental review will be required for each project and the appropriate environmental determination will be made. BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION On June 13, 2018, the Planning Commission provided an advisory recommendation that Council adopt (4-0) the ordinance. DISCUSSION In keeping with the Healthy Community goal of the Strategic Plan, on January 5, 2016, the first Healthy Chula Vista Action Plan was adopted, providing a set of strategies to review, create, and evaluate policies and programs within the City and to develop key community partnerships to promote wellness within our community. A key component of the plan included residents’ access to healthy food options. Consistent with the adopted Healthy Chula Vista Action Plan and its strategies, staff is recommending the adoption of an Urban Agriculture Incentive Zone (UAIZ) within Chula Vista as allowed by Assembly Bill 551 (passed in 2013 and recently amended in September 2017)and as initially brought before you in November 2017. AB551 allows jurisdictions to identify and adopt an UAIZ, an incentive for landowners to enter into contract to use their otherwise “unused” property for agricultural use for a minimum of five years in exchange for a reduction in property tax. Rather than paying the standard applicable property tax rate (e.g. commercial tax rate for a commercial property), participating properties will be assessed at the lowest of three values: (1) the value based on the average per-acre value of irrigated cropland in California; (2) the current fair market value; or (3) the factored base year value (Proposition 13 value). If this is less than the current assessed value of the land, then the owner will pay lower property taxes for the period of the UAIZ contract. AB551 identifies the parameters for the program which have been summarized into a program guide (see UAIZ Program Guidelines, Attachment 3). Over 150 properties within Chula Vista were identified as being eligible. While properties may have been identified due to their current eligibility meeting the acreage requirements and by not having current improvements (e.g. structures), the City expects far less properties will voluntarily participate due to pending development plans. An analysis was conducted as part of the County approval process to identify all potentially impacted taxing entities, and determined that if all City properties were to participate the projected cost to all taxing entities would be between $345,000 to $395,000 annually, a summary specific to the City is provided below under ongoing fiscal impact. An analysis would be conducted on each participating parcel at time of application, with notification to the affected entities. To establish the UAIZ for Chula Vista a Draft Ordinance was presented to the County Board of Supervisors in substantial form. Since County approval, minor changes have been included to reduce barriers related to agricultural use in specific residential zones, specifically CVMC section 19.100.060(B)(1). No other P a g e | 3 substantive changes were made (see CVMC 19.100 UAIZ Program, Attachment 4). Once the UAIZ is effective, interested landowners must enter into a contract with the City and will have 60 days to initiate the agricultural use on the property (see Sample UAIZ Property Contract, Attachment 5). Currently contracts can be entered into up until January 1, 2029, the sunset date of the State law. If the property owner breaches their contract they will have to pay back the taxes the incentive granted them. DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT Staff has reviewed the property holdings of the City Council and has found no property holdings within 500 feet of the boundaries of the property which is the subject to this action. Staff is not independently aware, nor has staff been informed by any Planning Commission member, of any other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision-maker conflict of interest in this matter. LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS The City’s Strategic Plan has five major goals: Operational Excellence, Economic Vitality, Healthy Community, Strong and Secure Neighborhoods and a Connected Community. This item supports Section 3.1.1 - Implement policies and programs that support a healthy community, by providing healthier options. CURRENT-YEAR FISCAL IMPACT Staff costs associated with the preparation of this staff report and for the UAIZ adoption process are offset by grant funds through the Centers for Disease Control’s Racial and Ethnic Approaches to Community Health (REACH Chula Vista). ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT Potential ongoing impacts were assessed by the County and any taxing agencies possibly affected by the adoption of the UAIZ were notified of the May 15th County public hearing. Specific to the city the following funds and total impact if all properties entered into a UAIZ could be impacted annually. City Fund Current Tax Projected Tax with UAIZ Loss due to UAIZ General Fund $20,286 $3,557 ($16,729) Otay Ranch No. 1 $771 $555 ($216) District No. 1 $40,750 $38,062 ($2,688) Bayfront Redevelopment Project -- ($61,590) Merged Redevelopment (AB1290)-- ($33,697) Otay Valley Rd. Redevelopment -- ($4,809) Southwest Redevelopment Project --($104,238) TOTAL POTENTIAL IMPACT ($223,967) Some Redevelopment areas are impacted first before other taxing entities and therefore could be impacted more significantly by a property utilizing the UAIZ program. Staff expects far less properties will voluntarily participate, particularly in redevelopment areas due to pending development plans. P a g e | 4 ATTACHMENTS 1.City Council Resolution No. 2017-198 2.County Board of Supervisors Resolution No. 18-062 3.UAIZ Program Guidelines 4.CVMC 19.100 UAIZ Program 5.Sample UAIZ Contract with Property Owner Staff Contact: Stacey Kurz, Senior Project Coordinator, Development Services Department URBAN AGRICULTURE INCENTIVE ZONE PROGRAM GUIDELINES Background The Urban Agriculture Incentive Zone Act (UAIZ) was enacted in 2013 by the State of California to enable local jurisdictions to enter into a contract to restrict the use of vacant, unimproved, or otherwise blighted lands for small-scale production of agricultural crops and animal husbandry. In return, property owners would have their property valued at the lowest of three values; the value based on the average per-acre value of irrigated cropland in California, the current fair market value, or the factored base year value (Proposition 13 value). The goal is to provide a tangible financial incentive for a landowner who may not be interested in immediately developing vacant land to utilize their property for small-scale agriculture. The savings varies from property to property depending on how the parcel is currently assessed. The Chula Vista City Council adopted Chula Vista Municipal Code Chapter 19.100 (the “Ordinance”) to establish an Urban Agriculture Incentive Zone Program in the City of Chula Vista. The State act defines “agricultural use” as: the cultivation and tillage of the soil; the production, cultivation, growing, and harvesting of any agricultural or horticultural products; the raising of livestock, bees, fur-bearing animals, dairy-producing animals, and poultry; agricultural education; and the sale of produce through field retail stands or farms stands. Scope of the Urban Agriculture Incentive Zone Program Targeted Population The state legislation permits urban agriculture incentive zones to only be established in “urban areas” with populations of 250,000 or more. The San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) estimated the City of Chula Vista over that requirement with a population of 265,070 as of January 1, 2016. The boundaries of the program are the City of Chula Vista boundaries. Participants in the program would be owners of vacant, blighted, or unimproved land interested in or already active in small-scale agriculture. Determining Eligibility This potential property tax reduction is an incentive offered citywide to property owners of vacant, blighted, or otherwise unimproved properties. Vacant is defined as a parcel with some form of improvement such as a slab, but with no structures. Unimproved is defined as an empty parcel with no form of improvements on it. Blighted is defined by California Health and Safety Code Section 33030. Urban Agriculture Incentive Zone Chula Vista Program Guidelines 2 The property must meet the standards established in State Code and the City of Chula Vista ordinance. Properties must be at least 0.1 acre in size and no larger than 3 acres (between 4,356 and 130,680 square feet). They must be completely dedicated toward agricultural use, free of any dwellings and only have physical structures that support the agricultural use of the site. Allowed structures include, but are not limited to, toolsheds, greenhouses, produce stands, and instructional space. Urban Agriculture Incentive Zone Agreement The Urban Agriculture Incentive Zone Program agreement is a legal contract binding the owner of a designated property to restrict the subject property to agricultural use consistent with California State Code and Chula Vista Municipal Code for a minimum of 5 years. In exchange for the dedication of property to agricultural uses, the owner will potentially receive reduced property taxes. The agreement is recorded with the County, which allows the Assessor to determine the property value at the lowest of three values; the value based on the average per-acre value of irrigated cropland in California, the current fair market value, or the factored base year value (Proposition 13 value). The agreement runs with the property despite individual ownership. The Urban Agriculture Incentive Zone Program agreement must be entered into or renewed prior to January 1, 2029. The City of Chula Vista may propose to end the Urban Agriculture Incentive Zone Program agreement if the property is not maintained in accordance with the contract provisions. The City of Chula Vista may propose to extend the program, contingent on the California State Legislature passing legislation extending the state bill. Maintenance of agricultural use is required for the entire duration of the contract. Inspection Schedule/Monitoring The City is responsible for assurance that a property remains in compliance with the provisions of the Urban Agriculture Incentive Zone Program agreement.Properties must begin urban agriculture operations within 60 days of contract filing. Annual monitoring will entail site visits,staff review of compliance with contract requirements, and will provide adequate review to ensure that agricultural use is occurring on the property. If there has been a change in ownership the City will contact the new owner to explain the responsibilities and provisions under the Urban Agriculture Incentive Zone Program agreement. The City will work with property owners to remedy any problems identified through the inspection process. A restoration plan may be prepared as part of a renewal of an agreement to assure the necessary remedy. The yearly inspection is the minimum that will occur, the City of Chula Vista has to the right/ability to inspect more frequently if concerns have been raised in relation to the property. Urban Agriculture Incentive Zone Chula Vista Program Guidelines 3 Fiscal Impact Property Owner Tax Savings The County Assessor determines the property value at the lowest of three values; the value based on the average per-acre value of irrigated cropland in California, the current fair market value, or the factored base year value (Proposition 13 value). Fees This program includes the following fees, adopted by the City Council, effective ____, to recover the costs of staff time devoted to the tasks specifically related to all components of the Urban Agriculture Incentive Zone Program: $__zoning determination fee, $__ County filing fee. Annual Threshold of New Reduction in Property Tax Revenue Based on the current level of agricultural use within the City of Chula Vista, the City Council does not establish an annual threshold. The City Council reserves the right to establish a threshold in the future. Fiscal Impact to Taxing Agencies In establishing a UAIZ encompassing the entire city boundaries, over 150 separate properties are identified as possibly eligible.If 100% of all potentially eligible properties participated in the UAIZ, all taxing agencies combined could see that annual revenue drop by $394,210. ATTACHMENT 4 Chapter 19.100 URBAN AGRICULTURE INCENTIVE ZONE PROGRAM Sections: 19.100.010 Title. 19.100.020 Purpose. 19.100.030 Urban Agriculture Incentive Zone (“UAIZ”) Established. 19.100.040 UAIZ Contract Required. 19.100.050 UAIZ Property. 19.100.060 Agricultural Uses. 19.100.070 County Assessor. 19.100.080 Agricultural Use Commencement. 19.100.090 Pesticides and Fertilizers-Restrictions. 19.100.100 Annual Inspection for Conformance. 19.100.110 Cancellation of UAIZ Contract with City. 19.100.120 Fees. 19.100.130 Implementation Date. 19.100.140 Limitation on Entry of UAIZ Contracts. 19.100.150 Additional Requirements CHAPTER 19.100 19.100.010 Title. This chapter shall be known as the City of Chula Vista Urban Agriculture Incentive Zone Program and may be referred to as the UAIZ Program. 19.100.020 Purpose. The purpose of the City of Chula Vista Urban Agricultural Incentive Zone Program is to implement AB 551, as described in section 51040, et seq., of the California Government Code and known as the Urban Agriculture Incentive Zones Act, to promote and foster urban agriculture. The UAIZ Program is designed to increase access to healthy food by providing an incentive for property owners of eligible vacant or unimproved properties within the City of Chula Vista to utilize these properties for small-scale agricultural uses. The property owners of eligible properties may voluntarily enter into agreements with the City to participate in the UAIZ Ordinance Page 2 Program (to promote urban agriculture enterprises) in exchange for potential reduced property tax assessments under section 422.7 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code. 19.100.030 Urban Agriculture Incentive Zone Established. In accordance with Urban Agricultural Incentive Zones Act, as set forth in AB 551 and which may be amended from time to time by the State Legislature, an Urban Agriculture Incentive Zone is hereby established in the City of Chula Vista. The Urban Agriculture Incentive Zone shall consist of all urban areas, as defined in Government Code sections 51040.3(a) and 51040.3(b), within the City of Chula Vista except those lands that are currently subject to, or have been subject to within the three (3) years immediately preceding the effective date of this Ordinance, a contract pursuant to the Williamson Act. The boundaries of the Urban Agriculture Incentive Zone shall be coterminous with the boundaries of the City of Chula Vista. 19.100.040 UAIZ Contract Required. Pursuant to the Urban Agricultural Incentive Zones Act, the City and any property owners within the Urban Agriculture Incentive Zone may enter into an enforceable contract, under terms and conditions required by the City Manager or City Attorney, including terms and conditions to ensure compliance with Section 19.100.060(B), to restrict the use of eligible property to small- scale agriculture uses for an initial term of not less than five (5) years, and which may be extended at the discretion of the City Manager (“UAIZ Contract”). The executed UAIZ Contract and any attendant attachments shall be recorded by the property owner with the County Recorder, with copies of the recorded documents to be provided to the City Manager within two (2) business days of the recordation. 19.100.050 UAIZ Property. Property eligible to enter into an UAIZ Contract shall consist of the following: 1. The property must be vacant or unimproved. The property may not contain any habitable dwellings, but may contain only non-habitable structures that are or will be accessory to agricultural uses, such as a toolshed, greenhouse, produce stand, or instructional facility as approved by the City Manager or their designee; and 2. The property is located within a Census-designated urbanized area, as defined in the AB 551, so long as it is not wholly or partially within a National Recreation Area, Significant Ecological Area, or Sensitive Environmental Resource Area; and 3. The property in its entirety shall be available for and dedicated to agricultural uses immediately and for the duration of the contract and which shall be for a term of five (5) years, which may be renewed at the discretion of the City Manager; and 4. The property shall be a minimum of one-tenth (0.10) of an acre and a maximum of three (3) acres; and 5. Secured property tax obligations shall be current and paid according to installments determined by State law. 6. All structures are subject to the provisions in CVMC 19.58.020. 19.100.060 Agricultural Uses A. Agricultural Use Defined. Subject to paragraph B (below), agricultural use(s) shall mean farming in all its branches including, but not limited to the cultivation and tillage of soil, the Ordinance Page 3 production, cultivation, growing, and harvesting of any agricultural or horticultural products, the raising of livestock, bees, fur-bearing animals, dairy-producing animals, poultry, agricultural education, the sale of produce through field retail stands or farm stands as defined by Article 5 (commencing with Section 47030) of Chapter 10.5 of Division 17 of the Food and Agriculture Code, and any practices performed by a farmer or on farm as incidental to or in conjunction with farm operations. The term “agricultural use” does not include timber production. The production, cultivation, growing, and harvesting of marijuana shall be prohibited in the UAIZ. B. Zoning and Municipal Code limitations on Agricultural Use(s)/UAIZ. 1. Neither the creation of the Urban Agricultural Incentive Zone nor the execution of any UAIZ Contract shall in any way expand the allowable uses of any property under the City’s existing land use zoning regulations or ordinances. Eligible land uses under the UAIZ Program may include any agricultural land uses that are permitted or conditionally permitted, but are subject to limitations set forth in this chapter, by AB 551, by the Chula Vista Municipal Code, including, but not limited to, Title 6 [Animals] and Chapter 19.20 [Agricultural Zone], or by the terms and conditions set forth in the UAIZ Contract. Conditional Use Permits may be required by the City Manager. 2. Chula Vista Municipal Code section 19.16.030 provides that lot sizes may not be less than one acre for crop and tree farming, as defined in Chapter 19.16. Notwithstanding the aforementioned one acre limitation, a lot size may be less than one (1) acre, but not less than one-tenth (.10) of an acre, when a UAIZ Contract is entered into pursuant to section 19.100.040 of this chapter. 19.100.070 County Assessor. Pursuant to the Urban Agricultural Incentive Zones Act, upon recordation of a UAIZ Contract, the County Assessor is required to value the restricted property at the lowest of three values: the value based on the average per-acre value of irrigated cropland in California as reported by the National Agricultural Statistics Service of the United States Department of Agriculture, the current fair market value, or the factored base year value (Proposition 13 value). 19.100.080 Agricultural Use Commencement and Continuation For Duration of UAIZ Contract. Agricultural use must commence on the property within sixty (60) days after the recordation of the UAIZ Contract. Pursuant to the Urban Agricultural Incentive Zones Act, the entirety of the property subject to a UAIZ Contract shall be dedicated to agricultural uses and such agricultural uses shall continue for the duration of the UAIZ Contract. 19.100.090 Pesticides and Fertilizers-Restrictions. Pursuant to the Urban Agricultural Incentive Zones Act, only pesticides or fertilizers sanctioned by the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s National Organic Program may be used on the property that is subject to the UAIZ Contract. 19.100.100 Annual Inspection for Conformance. The City Manager may conduct a site inspection to verify the property owner's conformance to the terms of the UAIZ Contract, including, but not limited to an initial inspection within ninety Ordinance Page 4 (90) days of the execution of a UAIZ Contract, every year after the execution of the UAIZ Contract, or as otherwise determined necessary by the City Manager. 19.100.110 Cancellation of an UAIZ Contract with the City. A. Circumstances to Cancel UAIZ Contract. Circumstances for cancelling a UAIZ Contract with the City shall include the following: 1.City-Initiated Cancellation for Noncompliance. If the City Manager finds that the property does not conform to the terms of the UAIZ Contract or the property owner does not permit a site inspection as set forth in section 19.100.100, the City Manager shall provide notice to the property owner of said non-compliance and a date by which to bring the property into compliance with the UAIZ Contract or to permit an inspection pursuant to section 19.100.100. Should the property owner fail to comply with the corrective actions required by the City Manager within a time period set forth by City Manager, then notice of cancellation shall be provided to the property owner, personally or by mail, that the UAIZ Contract will be cancelled fifteen (15) calendar days after personal service or mailing of the notice. At the end of the fifteen (15) days, if the property owner has not brought the property into compliance with the terms of the UAIZ Contact or permitted an inspection pursuant to section 19.100.100, the City Manager shall execute a cancellation document and record it with the Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk and notify the County Assessor. 2.Property Owner-Initiated Cancellation. If the property owner submits a request to the City Manager to cancel a recorded UAIZ Contract, the City Manager will execute a cancellation document with the property owner, which the City Manager will record with the Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk and notify the County Assessor. B. Effect of Cancellation—Fee and Tax Rate. Pursuant to Government Code section 51042(a)(2)(B), the City shall impose a fee equal to the cumulative value of the tax benefit received during the duration of the UAIZ Contract upon the property owner for cancellation of any UAIZ Contract prior to the expiration of that contract, unless the City Council makes a determination that the cancellation was caused by extenuating circumstances despite the good faith effort by the property owner. The property also shall be re-assessed to its previous non-agricultural tax rate by the County Assessor following recordation of the cancellation document. 19.100.120 Fees. A property owner may be subject to a fee payable to the City for the implementation, administration, and monitoring of the UAIZ Contract and its terms. Said fees shall be promulgated in accordance to the City’s Master Fee Schedule processes. 19.100.130 Implementation Date. The Urban Agriculture Incentive Zone Program shall not be effective until the County of San Diego has approved the City of Chula Vista participation the UAIZ Program as required by AB 551. 19.100.140 Limitation on entry of UAIZ Contracts. Ordinance Page 5 Unless extended by State law, no UAIZ Contract for property within the City’s UAIZ shall be renewed or created after January 1, 2029. However, any UAIZ Contract entered into pursuant to this Chapter on or before January 1, 2029, to the extent allowed by law, shall be valid and enforceable for the duration of the UAIZ Contract. 19.100.150 Additional Requirements. A property owner who enters into a UAIZ Contract and the property subject to a UAIZ Contract are subject to additional regulations as determined by the Chula Vista Municipal Code, by the County of San Diego, or by the State Legislature. URBAN AGRICULTURE INCENTIVE ZONE CONTRACT This URBAN AGRICULTURE INCENTIVE ZONE CONTRACT (“Contract” or “UAIZ Contract”), dated __________________, for purposes of identification only, is by and between the City of Chula Vista, a California municipal corporation, (“City”) and [PROPERTY OWNER] (“Property Owner”). The City and Property Owner are sometimes each referred to as “Party” and collectively as the “Parties.” Background In 2013, the State of California enacted the Urban Agriculture Incentive Zones Act (commencing with California Government Code section 51040) (“UAIZ Act”), which recognizes the public interest in promoting sustainable urban farming. The UAIZ Act authorizes cities and counties to establish Urban Agriculture Incentive Zones (“UAIZ”) for the purpose of entering into voluntary contracts with property owners of vacant, unimproved, or blighted lands within the zone. Through these contracts, property owners can agree to commit their land to urban agriculture for a minimum of five years in exchange for potential lower property taxes during the term of the contract. To take advantage of the UAIZ Act, the City, in 2018, adopted Chula Vista Municipal Code Chapter 19.100 (the “Ordinance”). The Ordinance authorizes the City Manager or the City Manager’s designees to enter into UAIZ Contracts with eligible property owners who agree to restrict the use of eligible property to small-scale agriculture uses (“Urban Agriculture” or “Agricultural Uses”) for an initial term of no less than five years, subject to the terms of the Ordinance, in exchange for potential lower property taxes during the term of the contract. The Property Owner owns the property located at [ADDRESS], in Chula Vista, California (the “Property”), and further described in Exhibit A, and has requested to enter into this Contract with the City. WITH THESE BACKGROUND FACTS IN MIND AND FOR VALUABLE AND SUFFICIENT CONSIDERATION, THE CITY AND THE PROPERTY OWNER AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. Term. The term of this Contract (“Term”) will run for five (5) years beginning on the Effective Date, unless terminated earlier in accordance with Section 5 of this Contract. 2. Property Owner Representations. Property Owner represents and warrants the following: 2.1 Property Size. The Property is at least 0.10 of an acre, and not more than three (3) acres. 2.2 Other Program Requirements.The Property meets all other requirements of the UAIZ Act and the Ordinance to enter into this contract. 2.3 Legal Description. The legal description in Exhibit A is a true and accurate legal description of the Property. 3. Property Owner Responsibilities. The Property Owner agrees to the following: 3.1 Use of the Property. Throughout the Term of the Contract, the Property Owner shall dedicate and use the entire Property for Urban Agriculture purposes in accordance with Government Code section 51040.3(c), the Ordinance, and this Contract. 3.2 Commencement of Urban Agriculture. The Property Owner shall commence Urban Agriculture (also referred to as “Agriculture Use”) in accordance with Chula Vista Municipal Code section 19.100.060 on the Property within sixty (60) days of the execution and recordation of this Contract. 3.3 Prohibition Against Dwellings. Except as provided in Government Code section 51042(c), there shall be no dwellings on the Property throughout the Term of the Contract. 3.4 Government Inspections. The Property Owner consents to periodic inspections of the Property, upon 72-hours’ notice, by the City Manager, the City Manager’s designee, the San Diego County assessor, and the State Board of Equalization, as may be necessary for tax assessment purposes or to determine the Property Owner’s compliance with this Contract or the law, including the Ordinance. 3.5 Pesticides and Fertilizers. The Property Owner shall not use any pesticides or fertilizers on the Property, except for those pesticides or fertilizers allowed by the United States Department of Agriculture’s National Organic Program. 3.6 Water Service. The Property shall have a metered water service connection. 3.7 Administration Fee. The City, pursuant to Chula Vista Municipal Code section 19.100.120, may charge the Property Owner a fee for the reasonable costs of implementing and administering the Contract, including the costs related to inspections on the Property and determining compliance with the Contract. The Property Owner shall pay the fee within forty-five (45) days of the City’s request. 3.8 Cessation or Change in Activity. (A) The Property Owner shall notify the City’s Development Services Department Director (“Director”), in writing, of the following: (1) Any cessation of Urban Agriculture for any reason, including cessation due to the loss of a tenant who was conducting Urban Agriculture on the Property; and (2) Any change in Urban Agriculture activity from that contemplated in the Urban Agricultural Plan (Exhibit B). Notices under this section must be given within two (2) weeks of the cessation or change in activity. (B) If the Property owner intends to continue to use the Property for Urban Agriculture, the Property Owner must notify the Director of that fact in its notice and resume Urban Agricultural activity within three (3) months of its notice to the Director of any cessation or change in use. 3.9 Additional terms. Property Owner agrees to any additional terms set forth in Exhibit C, which are hereby incorporated into this Contract by reference. 4. Property Tax. This Contract is entered into under the authority of the UAIZ Act and the Ordinance. Accordingly, the Property shall be assessed pursuant to California Revenue and Taxation Code section 422.7. Property owner understands and agrees that the aforementioned property tax assessment (including attendant calculation) is the function of the San Diego County Assessor. Property owner agrees to hold City harmless and waives any claims against the City, including its Indemnified Parties (as defined below) regarding the aforementioned property tax assessment. 5. Termination. 5.1 Events of Default. The following events, if not cured within ten (10) days of the City’s written notice (unless the City’s notice provides for a different date), are “Events of Default”: (A) The Property Owner has failed to commence Urban Agriculture on the Property within sixty (60) days of the Effective Date of the Contract; (B) The Property Owner has failed to conduct Urban Agriculture on the Property in accordance with the UAIZ Act, the Ordinance, and this Contract; (C) The Property contains a dwelling, except as provided in Government Code section 51042(c); (D) The Property Owner has failed to resume Urban Agriculture on the Property after cessation in accordance with Section 3.8(B) of this Contract; (E) The Property Owner has failed to allow any inspection as provided in Section 3.5 of this Contract; (F) The Property Owner has failed to timely pay the Administration Fee in accordance with Section 3.7 of this Contract; (G) The Property Owner has failed to maintain adequate insurance for the Property in accordance with Section 7 of this Contract; or (H) The Property Owner has failed to comply with any other provision of this Contract, the Ordinance, or UAIZ Act. Upon the occurrence of an Event of Default, the City may terminate the Contract, as set forth in the Chula Vista Municipal Code section 19.100.110. The City shall give the Property Owner and the San Diego County Assessor notice of the termination. Upon termination of the Contract, the City shall record a Notice of Termination with the San Diego County Recorder and provide a copy of the recorded notice to the San Diego County Assessor. 5.2 Property Owner Termination. Prior to the expiration of the Term, the Property Owner may terminate the Contract at any time by submitting written notice to the City’s Development Services Department Director and the county assessor and subject to the terms of Chula Vista Municipal Code section 19.100.110(A)(2) and (B). Upon termination of the Contract, the Property Owner shall record a notice of termination with the San Diego County Recorder and provide a copy of the recorded notice to the San Diego County Assessor. 5.3 Termination Fee. If the Contract is terminated by the City or the Property Owner prior to the expiration of the Term, the Property Owner must pay to the San Diego County Treasurer-Tax Collector a termination fee equal to the cumulative value of the tax benefit received during the duration of the Contract, as determined by the San Diego County Assessor. Interest will be determined by the City. The City Manager or the City Manager’s designee may waive payment of all or a portion of the fee if he or she determines that the termination was caused by extenuating circumstances despite the good faith effort by the Property Owner. 6. Indemnity and Administrative Claims 6.1 Indemnity. The Property Owner shall defend, hold harmless and indemnify the City, its elected and appointed officers, agents, employees and volunteers (collectively, “Indemnified Parties”), and each and every one of them, from and against any and all actions, damages, costs, liabilities, claims, demands, losses, judgments, penalties, costs and expenses of every type and description, including, but not limited to, any fees or costs reasonably incurred by the City’s staff attorneys or outside attorneys and any fees and expenses incurred in enforcing this provision (hereafter collectively referred to as “Liabilities”), including but not limited to Liabilities arising from personal injury or death, damage to personal, real or intellectual property or the environment, contractual or other economic damages, or regulatory penalties, arising out of or in any way connected with performance of or failure to perform this Contract by the Property Owner, any sub- consultant, subcontractor or agent, volunteer, anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable, whether or not (i) such Liabilities are caused in part by a party indemnified hereunder or (ii) such Liabilities are litigated, settled or reduced to judgment; provided that the foregoing indemnity does not apply to liability for any damage or expense for death or bodily injury to persons or damage to property to the extent arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the Indemnified Parties. Also covered is liability arising from, connected with, caused by or claimed to be caused by the active or passive negligent acts or omissions of the Indemnified Parties which may be in combination with the active or passive negligent acts or omissions of the Property Owner, its officers, employees, agents or officers, volunteers, or any third party. 6.2 Administrative Claims Requirements and Procedures. No suit or arbitration shall be brought arising out of this Agreement against City unless a claim has first been presented in writing and filed with City and acted upon by City in accordance with the procedures set forth in Chapter 1.34 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, as same may be amended, the provisions of which, including such policies and procedures used by City in the implementation of same, are incorporated herein by this reference. Upon request by City, Property shall meet and confer in good faith with City for the purpose of resolving any dispute over the terms of this Agreement. Compliance with this section shall not relieve Property Owner with any other claims requirements under state or federal law. 7. Miscellaneous Provisions. 7.1 Effective Date and Recordation. Upon approval by the Office of the City Attorney, this Contract is effective on the date both Parties have signed it, as indicated by the dates in the signature blocks below. Within 20 days after the Effective Date of this Contract, the City shall record with the San Diego County Recorder a copy of the Contract which shall describe the land subject thereto, together with a map showing the location of the Property. 7.2 Notices. Any notice required under this Contract or by reason of the application of any law will be deemed to have been given by a Party on the business day immediately following the day of personal delivery to a recognized overnight courier or on the third business day after deposit in the U.S. mail, postage prepaid. 7.3 Entire Contract.This document, including all Exhibits, contains the entire agreement between the Parties and supersedes whatever oral or written understanding they may have had prior to the execution of the Contract. No alteration to this Contract is valid unless approved in writing by the Parties. 7.4 Public Record. The Property Owner understands that this Contract is a public record under the California Public Records Act and will be disclosed to the public upon request. 7.5 Severability. If any portion of this Contract or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Contract shall not be affected thereby and shall be enforced to the greatest extent permitted by law. 7.6 No Waiver. No failure by the City to insist on the strict performance of any obligation of the Property Owner under this Contract, or to exercise any right power or remedy arising out of a breach hereof, shall constitute a waiver of such breach or of the City’s right to demand strict compliance with any terms of this Contract. 7.7 Choice of Law; Venue. The procedural and substantive laws of the State of California shall govern the interpretation and enforcement of this Contract, without application of conflicts of laws, principles, or statutes. The Parties acknowledge and agree that this Contract is entered into, is to be fully performed in, and relates to real property located in the County of San Diego. All legal actions arising from this Contract shall be filed in the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of San Diego or in the United States District Court with jurisdiction in the County of San Diego. 7.8 Binding on Successors and Assigns. The covenants, benefits, restrictions, and obligations contained in this Contract shall run with the land and shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of all successors and assigns in interest of the Property Owner. 7.9 Further Assurances. The Parties, at any time after the execution of this Contract will execute, acknowledge, and deliver any further assignments, conveyances, and other assurances, documents, and instruments reasonably requested by the other party for the purpose of performing the obligations created hereunder. 7.10 Third Parties. This Contract is made and entered into for the sole protection and benefit of the Parties and their successors and assigns, and no other person or entity is a third-party beneficiary of, or has any direct or indirect cause of action or claim in connection with the Contract or any other related document to which that person or entity is not a party. 7.11 Attorney’s Fees. The Party prevailing in any litigation concerning this Contract or any documents related to it will be entitled to an award by the court of reasonable attorneys’ fees and litigation costs through final resolution on appeal, in addition to any other relief that may be granted in the litigation. If the City is the prevailing party, then this section will apply whether the City is represented in the litigation by the Office of the City Attorney or by outside counsel. 7.12 Relationship of the Parties. Nothing in this Contract should be deemed or construed to create between the Parties a joint venture, partnership, or any other relationship of association other than that described herein. 7.13 Authority to Sign. The person signing the Contract on the Property Owner’s behalf represents that he or she is the Property Owner of the Property or is authorized to sign on behalf of the Property Owner and that no further action beyond his or her signature is required to bind the Property Owner to this Contract. 7.14 Insurance. Property Owner agrees to acquire and maintain insurance as may be required by the City. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, by executing this UAIZ Contract where indicated below, City and Property agree that they have read and understood all terms and conditions of the UAIZ Contract, that they fully agree and consent to bound by same, and that they are freely entering into this Contract as of the Effective Date. PROPERTY OWNER:CITY OF CHULA VISTA: BY:_________________ Date: ________BY:___________________Date: ________ Enter Name Of Signatory GARY HALBERT Enter Title Of Signatory CITY MANAGER ATTEST: BY: ________________________________ Kerry K. Bigelow, MMC City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: BY: ________________________________ Glen R. Googins City Attorney ORDINANCE NO. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ADDING CHAPTER 19.100 TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADOPT AND ESTABLISH AN URBAN AGRICULTURE INCENTIVE ZONE WHEREAS, California Assembly Bill 551 (“Urban Agriculture Incentive Zones Act”) added Chapter 6.3, commencing with 51040, to Part 1 of Division 1 of Title 5 of the California Government Code, amended 402.1 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code, and added 422.7 to the California Revenue and Taxation Code; and WHEREAS, the Urban Agriculture Incentive Zones Act is intended to promote small scale agriculture on vacant, unimproved, or blighted lands in urban areas; and WHEREAS, the City of Chula Vista (“City”) has existing land use zoning regulations pertaining to small-scale agriculture; and WHEREAS, the Urban Agriculture Incentive Zones Act authorizes, under specified conditions and until January 1, 2029 (or to a time otherwise provided for by the State), the City and a property owner to enter into a contract to restrict the property owner’s use of their vacant, unimproved, or otherwise blighted lands for small-scale agricultural use in urban areas, provided the contract is for a term of no less than five (5) years and the property is at least 0.10 acre and not more than three (3) acres in size; and WHEREAS, in exchange for the property owner restricting their property for urban agriculture and entering into a contract pursuant to the Urban Agriculture Incentive Zones Act, the San Diego County Assessor (“County Assessor”) is required to value the restricted property at the lowest of three values: the value based on the average per-acre value of irrigated cropland in California, the current fair market value, or the factored base year value (Proposition 13 value); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Urban Agriculture Incentive Zones Act, property owners who breach the contract or terminate the contract prior to its expiration are obligated to pay a fee equal to the tax benefit they received; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Urban Agriculture Incentive Zones Act, no Urban Agriculture Incentive Zone may be established in any area that is currently subject to, or has been subject to, within the previous three (3) years, a contract pursuant to California Government Code sections 51200 to 51297.4 (the “Williamson Act”); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Urban Agriculture Incentive Zones Act, the establishment of an Urban Agriculture Incentive Zone within the City of Chula Vista is subject to approval by the County Board of Supervisors, which was approved by County Resolution No. 18-062 on May 15, 2018; and Ordinance Page 2 WHEREAS, on June 13, 2018 the City of Chula Vista Planning Commission held a public hearing and recommended by a vote of 4-0 that City Council adopt the ordinance (CVMC 19.100) to establish an Urban Agriculture Incentive Zone by Resolution No. MPA18-0005. NOW THEREFORE the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does ordain as follows: Section I. Chapter 19.100 is hereby added to the Chula Vista Municipal Code as follows: Chapter 19.100 URBAN AGRICULTURE INCENTIVE ZONE PROGRAM Sections: 19.100.010 Title. 19.100.020 Purpose. 19.100.030 Urban Agriculture Incentive Zone (“UAIZ”) Established. 19.100.040 UAIZ Contract Required. 19.100.050 UAIZ Property. 19.100.060 Agricultural Uses. 19.100.070 County Assessor. 19.100.080 Agricultural Use Commencement. 19.100.090 Pesticides and Fertilizers-Restrictions. 19.100.100 Annual Inspection for Conformance. 19.100.110 Cancellation of UAIZ Contract with City. 19.100.120 Fees. 19.100.130 Implementation Date. 19.100.140 Limitation on Entry of UAIZ Contracts. 19.100.150 Additional Requirements CHAPTER 19.100 19.100.010 Title. This chapter shall be known as the City of Chula Vista Urban Agriculture Incentive Zone Program and may be referred to as the UAIZ Program. Ordinance Page 3 19.100.020 Purpose. The purpose of the City of Chula Vista Urban Agricultural Incentive Zone Program is to implement AB 551, as described in section 51040, et seq., of the California Government Code and known as the Urban Agriculture Incentive Zones Act, to promote and foster urban agriculture. The UAIZ Program is designed to increase access to healthy food by providing an incentive for property owners of eligible vacant or unimproved properties within the City of Chula Vista to utilize these properties for small-scale agricultural uses. The property owners of eligible properties may voluntarily enter into agreements with the City to participate in the UAIZ Program (to promote urban agriculture enterprises) in exchange for potential reduced property tax assessments under section 422.7 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code. 19.100.030 Urban Agriculture Incentive Zone Established. In accordance with Urban Agricultural Incentive Zones Act, as set forth in AB 551 and which may be amended from time to time by the State Legislature, an Urban Agriculture Incentive Zone is hereby established in the City of Chula Vista. The Urban Agriculture Incentive Zone shall consist of all urban areas, as defined in Government Code sections 51040.3(a) and 51040.3(b), within the City of Chula Vista except those lands that are currently subject to, or have been subject to within the three (3) years immediately preceding the effective date of this Ordinance, a contract pursuant to the Williamson Act. The boundaries of the Urban Agriculture Incentive Zone shall be coterminous with the boundaries of the City of Chula Vista. 19.100.040 UAIZ Contract Required. Pursuant to the Urban Agricultural Incentive Zones Act, the City and any property owners within the Urban Agriculture Incentive Zone may enter into an enforceable contract, under terms and conditions required by the City Manager or City Attorney, including terms and conditions to ensure compliance with Section 19.100.060(B), to restrict the use of eligible property to small- scale agriculture uses for an initial term of not less than five (5) years, and which may be extended at the discretion of the City Manager (“UAIZ Contract”). The executed UAIZ Contract and any attendant attachments shall be recorded by the property owner with the County Recorder, with copies of the recorded documents to be provided to the City Manager within two (2) business days of the recordation. 19.100.050 UAIZ Property. Property eligible to enter into an UAIZ Contract shall consist of the following: 1. The property must be vacant or unimproved. The property may not contain any habitable dwellings, but may contain only non-habitable structures that are or will be accessory to agricultural uses, such as a toolshed, greenhouse, produce stand, or instructional facility as approved by the City Manager or their designee; and 2. The property is located within a Census-designated urbanized area, as defined in the AB 551, so long as it is not wholly or partially within a National Recreation Area, Significant Ecological Area, or Sensitive Environmental Resource Area; and 3. The property in its entirety shall be available for and dedicated to agricultural uses immediately and for the duration of the contract and which shall be for a term of five (5) years, which may be renewed at the discretion of the City Manager; and Ordinance Page 4 4. The property shall be a minimum of one-tenth (0.10) of an acre and a maximum of three (3) acres; and 5. Secured property tax obligations shall be current and paid according to installments determined by State law. 6. All structures are subject to the provisions in CVMC 19.58.020. 19.100.060 Agricultural Uses A. Agricultural Use Defined. Subject to paragraph B (below), agricultural use(s) shall mean farming in all its branches including, but not limited to the cultivation and tillage of soil, the production, cultivation, growing, and harvesting of any agricultural or horticultural products, the raising of livestock, bees, fur-bearing animals, dairy-producing animals, poultry, agricultural education, the sale of produce through field retail stands or farm stands as defined by Article 5 (commencing with Section 47030) of Chapter 10.5 of Division 17 of the Food and Agriculture Code, and any practices performed by a farmer or on farm as incidental to or in conjunction with farm operations. The term “agricultural use” does not include timber production. The production, cultivation, growing, and harvesting of marijuana shall be prohibited in the UAIZ. B. Zoning and Municipal Code limitations on Agricultural Use(s)/UAIZ. 1. Neither the creation of the Urban Agricultural Incentive Zone nor the execution of any UAIZ Contract shall in any way expand the allowable uses of any property under the City’s existing land use zoning regulations or ordinances. Eligible land uses under the UAIZ Program may include any agricultural land uses that are permitted or conditionally permitted, but are subject to limitations set forth in this chapter, by AB 551, by the Chula Vista Municipal Code, including, but not limited to, Title 6 [Animals] and Chapter 19.20 [Agricultural Zone], or by the terms and conditions set forth in the UAIZ Contract. Conditional Use Permits may be required by the City Manager. 2. Chula Vista Municipal Code section 19.16.030 provides that lot sizes may not be less than one acre for crop and tree farming, as defined in Chapter 19.16. Notwithstanding the aforementioned one acre limitation, a lot size may be less than one (1) acre, but not less than one-tenth (.10) of an acre, when a UAIZ Contract is entered into pursuant to section 19.100.040 of this chapter. 19.100.070 County Assessor. Pursuant to the Urban Agricultural Incentive Zones Act, upon recordation of a UAIZ Contract, the County Assessor is required to value the restricted property at the lowest of three values: the value based on the average per-acre value of irrigated cropland in California as reported by the National Agricultural Statistics Service of the United States Department of Agriculture, the current fair market value, or the factored base year value (Proposition 13 value). 19.100.080 Agricultural Use Commencement and Continuation For Duration of UAIZ Contract. Agricultural use must commence on the property within sixty (60) days after the recordation of the UAIZ Contract. Pursuant to the Urban Agricultural Incentive Zones Act, the entirety of the property subject to a UAIZ Contract shall be dedicated to agricultural uses and such agricultural uses shall continue for the duration of the UAIZ Contract. Ordinance Page 5 19.100.090 Pesticides and Fertilizers-Restrictions. Pursuant to the Urban Agricultural Incentive Zones Act, only pesticides or fertilizers sanctioned by the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s National Organic Program may be used on the property that is subject to the UAIZ Contract. 19.100.100 Annual Inspection for Conformance. The City Manager may conduct a site inspection to verify the property owner's conformance to the terms of the UAIZ Contract, including, but not limited to an initial inspection within ninety (90) days of the execution of a UAIZ Contract, every year after the execution of the UAIZ Contract, or as otherwise determined necessary by the City Manager. 19.100.110 Cancellation of an UAIZ Contract with the City. A. Circumstances to Cancel UAIZ Contract. Circumstances for cancelling a UAIZ Contract with the City shall include the following: 1.City-Initiated Cancellation for Noncompliance. If the City Manager finds that the property does not conform to the terms of the UAIZ Contract or the property owner does not permit a site inspection as set forth in section 19.100.100, the City Manager shall provide notice to the property owner of said non-compliance and a date by which to bring the property into compliance with the UAIZ Contract or to permit an inspection pursuant to section 19.100.100. Should the property owner fail to comply with the corrective actions required by the City Manager within a time period set forth by City Manager, then notice of cancellation shall be provided to the property owner, personally or by mail, that the UAIZ Contract will be cancelled fifteen (15) calendar days after personal service or mailing of the notice. At the end of the fifteen (15) days, if the property owner has not brought the property into compliance with the terms of the UAIZ Contact or permitted an inspection pursuant to section 19.100.100, the City Manager shall execute a cancellation document and record it with the Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk and notify the County Assessor. 2.Property Owner-Initiated Cancellation. If the property owner submits a request to the City Manager to cancel a recorded UAIZ Contract, the City Manager will execute a cancellation document with the property owner, which the City Manager will record with the Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk and notify the County Assessor. B. Effect of Cancellation—Fee and Tax Rate. Pursuant to Government Code section 51042(a)(2)(B), the City shall impose a fee equal to the cumulative value of the tax benefit received during the duration of the UAIZ Contract upon the property owner for cancellation of any UAIZ Contract prior to the expiration of that contract, unless the City Council makes a determination that the cancellation was caused by extenuating circumstances despite the good faith effort by the property owner. The property also shall be re-assessed to its previous non-agricultural tax rate by the County Assessor following recordation of the cancellation document. 19.100.120 Fees. A property owner may be subject to a fee payable to the City for the implementation, administration, and monitoring of the UAIZ Contract and its terms. Said fees shall be promulgated in accordance to the City’s Master Fee Schedule processes. Ordinance Page 6 19.100.130 Implementation Date. The Urban Agriculture Incentive Zone Program shall not be effective until the County of San Diego has approved the City of Chula Vista participation the UAIZ Program as required by AB 551. 19.100.140 Limitation on entry of UAIZ Contracts. Unless extended by State law, no UAIZ Contract for property within the City’s UAIZ shall be renewed or created after January 1, 2029. However, any UAIZ Contract entered into pursuant to this Chapter on or before January 1, 2029, to the extent allowed by law, shall be valid and enforceable for the duration of the UAIZ Contract. 19.100.150 Additional Requirements. A property owner who enters into a UAIZ Contract and the property subject to a UAIZ Contract are subject to additional regulations as determined by the Chula Vista Municipal Code, by the County of San Diego, or by the State Legislature. Section II. Severability If any portion of this Ordinance, or its application to any person or circumstance, is for any reason held to be invalid, unenforceable or unconstitutional, by a court of competent jurisdiction, that portion shall be deemed severable, and such invalidity, unenforceability or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining portions of the Ordinance, or its application to any other person or circumstance. The City Council of the City of Chula Vista hereby declares that it would have adopted each section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance, irrespective of the fact that any one or more other sections, sentences, clauses or phrases of the Ordinance be declared invalid, unenforceable or unconstitutional. Section III. Construction The City Council of the City of Chula Vista intends this Ordinance to supplement, not to duplicate or contradict, applicable state and federal law and this Ordinance shall be construed in light of that intent. Section IV. Effective Date This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force on the thirtieth day after its final passage. Section V. Publication The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published or posted according to law. Presented by Approved as to form by _________________________________________________________________________ Kelly G. Broughton, FASLA Glen R. Googins Director of Development Services City Attorney P a g e | 1 July 10, 2018 File ID: 18-0202 TITLE A. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE EASTERN URBAN CENTER PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT REGULATIONS AND DESIGN PLAN (FORM BASED CODE) FOR 207 ACRES OF LAND IN THE EASTERN URBAN CENTER PORTION OF THE OTAY RANCH RELATING TO MODIFICATIONS IN THE OVERALL BUILDOUT INTENSITY, BUILDING HEIGHTS AND DISTRICT 6 REGULATIONS (FIRST READING) B. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL CONSIDERING THE MODIFICATIONS TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL PUBLIC FACILITIES FINANCE PLAN (PFFP) AND FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS (FIA) AND APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE EASTERN URBAN CENTER SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA (SPA) PLAN AND ASSOCIATED REGULATORY DOCUMENTS RELATING TO MODIFICATIONS IN THE OVERALL BUILDOUT INTENSITY, BUILDING HEIGHTS AND DISTRICT 6 REGULATIONS C. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL CONSIDERING THE ADDENDUM TO EIR 07-01 AND APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE EASTERN URBAN CENTER SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA (SPA) PLAN AND ASSOCIATED REGULATORY DOCUMENTS RELATING TO MODIFICATIONS IN THE OVERALL BUILDOUT INTENSITY, BUILDING HEIGHTS AND DISTRICT 6 REGULATIONS D. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE DEVELOPER AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND SLF IV – MILLENIA, LLC RECOMMENDED ACTION Council conduct the public hearing, adopt the resolutions and place the ordinances on first reading. SUMMARY SLF IV-Millenia LLC (“Applicant” or “Developer”) is requesting to amend the adopted Eastern Urban Center (“Millenia”) Sectional Planning Area Plan (“SPA”) and Form Based Code to reflect: 1) a proposed reduction in the ultimate buildout and changes to the low intensities for the project, as well as modify the intensity transfer language between Districts; 2) revise the Main Street District regulations to update the amount and geographic distribution of commercial uses in the district; and 3) modify design standards for height, setbacks and height blending. The project also includes a Supplemental Public Facilities Financing Plan (PFFP), updated Fiscal Impact Analysis (FIA) and First Amendment to the Developer Agreement to reflect the proposed amendments. An EIR Addendum with additional information and analysis of the proposed amendments will also be considered. On May 24, 2017, the applicant filed applications to process all of the subject items. P a g e | 2 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Director of Development Services has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the project was adequately covered in previously adopted Final Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern Urban Center (Millenia) Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan (FEIR 07-01) (SCH#2007041074). The Development Services Director has determined that only minor technical changes or additions to this document are necessary and that none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines calling for the preparation of a subsequent document have occurred; therefore, the Development Service Director has prepared an Addendum to FEIR 07-01. BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION On June 13, 2018, the Planning Commission took action and voted 4-0 that the Council adopt the resolutions and the ordinances. DISCUSSION Background The Millenia project (“Project”) is located at the southwest corner of Birch Road and Eastlake Parkway, east of the SR 125 toll road (see Locator Map, Attachment 1). The Project was originally adopted on October 6, 2009 by Resolution No. 2009-224 and by Ordinance No. 3142 with subsequent amendments in 2013 and two in 2016. The project site is 206-acres in area and has been fully graded. Millenia is described as an urban mixed-use center with a maximum buildout of 2,983 multi-family residential units and 3,487 million square feet of commercial uses including office, hospitality, retail and civic uses. More than four miles of new streets have been installed to date, with the final phase of infrastructure development slated to start construction in the fall of this year. Approximately 70% of the 145 acres of private development land has either been sold to merchant builders or is under contract with builders. The land sales to date include every land use contemplated for Millenia including office, retail, hotel, and residential: rental, for-sale and affordable housing projects. Two projects have been completed and fully occupied including the 273-unit Pulse Millenia Apartments and the 210-unit Chelsea Investments Duetta family and Volta senior affordable apartments. Eight additional projects are currently under construction including: Ayres Hotel - a 135-room four story hotel. Scheduled to open by the end of 2018. The Sudberry Properties Millenia Commons Retail Center - a 130,000 square foot retail center with major tenants including Buy-Buy Baby, Ross, Home Goods and Cost Plus. Scheduled opening late 2018. Trammel Crow Residential Alexan Apartments- a 309-unit mixed use rental project with 10,000 square feet of commercial and live work units. First occupancy scheduled for June 2018. Trammel Crow Residential Esplanade Apartments - a 253-unit rental community scheduled to open in mid-2019. Metro, Evo and Trio by Meridian Communities - a 217-unit condominium project. As of May 2018, the project has sold more than 130 homes. Element and Z by Shea Homes - a two product community comprised of 106 three story townhomes and 70 detached urban homes. As of May 2018, more than 100 of the homes had been sold. Skylar by KB Homes - a 79-unit project of detached urban homes. As of May 2018, 14 of the homes had been sold. Boulevard by Lennar - a 78-unit townhome project. As of May 2018, building permits had been pulled for approximately 30-units and first occupancies are anticipated in October of this year. P a g e | 3 In addition, Chesnut Properties is in City building plan check for the first of three office campus projects which includes 324,100 square feet of class A office, an amenity building and a five-story parking structure. Meridian Communities has also submitted a Design Review application for Pinnacle, a proposed four-story for-sale project. Millenia also includes six parks, a fire station, a pedestrian bridge over Eastlake Parkway, and a site for a future elementary school. One of the parks has been completed and is open for public use, and three more are under design and expected to start construction within the next 9-12 months. The fire station is under design and expected to be completed in early 2020, and the pedestrian bridge is under design with construction slated to begin later this year. The school site has been graded but timing for the school’s construction has not yet been identified by the District. The project also incorporates a segment of the San Diego Association of Governments (“SANDAG”) Bus Rapid Transit line. The construction of the first two segments of the guideway in the Millenia project have been advanced by the applicant and will be complete in the summer of this year. SANDAG has agreed to implement service to Millenia starting in 2019. Necessity of Amendments Millenia was intended to build out over a period of decades, with the project intensifying over time in response to market demand and opportunities. The plan discusses this phased intensification over time which would occur when surface parking lots were converted to structured parking and taller buildings or via redevelopment or tear downs and replacements with more intensive land uses. While intended to build out and intensify over an extended timeframe, as discussed above, more than 70% of the private development land in Millenia is already contracted with merchant builders. The developer indicates that in order to keep the overall project viable in the current marketplace amendments are necessary at this time. City staff concurred that due to the pace development is occurring additional amendments to the regulatory documents are critical at this point. Staff has been working closely with the applicant to ensure the proposed amendments not only provide the flexibility to move the project forward at this time, but to ensure both the original vision of the project is maintained and future opportunities are not lost due to the initial build out of the project. Compliance with Council Policy No. 400-02 (Public Participation) The Applicant conducted a public workshop to present the proposed amendments on April 5, 2018 at the Otay Ranch Library’s HUB. The meeting was noticed in the paper and mailed to residents and Home Owner Associations in compliance with Council Policy No. 400-02. Proposed Amendments & Analysis The proposed amendments to the Millenia SPA Plan (“SPA”), and Form Based Code can be summarized in three main topic areas. 1. Land Use Intensities - Amend the SPA and Form Based Code to establish new maximum and low land use intensities of 2,983/1,236 residential units and 3.324M/1.568M square feet of commercial uses. 2. Main Street District (6) - Revisions to reduce the amount of residential and commercial land uses, and modify the geographic distribution of those commercial uses in the district. 3. Design Standard Modifications - Revise the Minimum Average Height on six lots from five stories to four stories and modify the minimum height in feet for residential buildings. The amendment also introduces a concept of “height blending” for four lots and establishes deviations for setbacks. P a g e | 4 Applicable text, tables and exhibits to reflect these changes have been submitted in the proposed amendment, (see EUC SPA Amendment, Attachment 2), and an analysis is provided below. 1. Land Use Intensities The existing SPA identifies a low, target and high land use intensity for each district, as depicted in the table below. The low represents the minimum to be built in that district and the target is the maximum, with all Districts totaling to a target not to exceed for the entire development of 3.487M square feet of non- residential and 2,983 units of residential. The high column represents a maximum intensity if transfers occurred between districts, in other words, the developer could increase above the target administratively as long as they reduced an equal amount from another district. If the developer ever proposed to increase above the high amounts in a district the zoning administrator would need to make findings for that approval per Section 04.05.003. Initial and Full Build The proposed amendment eliminates a set target and allows the applicant to work within the low and high ranges as depicted in the table below. The low column representation the initial or minimum build out of the project and the high column represents the previous target numbers or maximum full build. Changes to both low and highs within Districts have also been made to account for what has been built to date and what is anticipated. District Description Acreage Low Target High Low Target High 1 Gateway Mixed Use Commercial District 22.7 100 400 700 - 50 100 2 Northwestern Neighborhood District 13.2 2 120 200 150 300 500 3 Northeastern Neighborhood District 17.2 10 50 250 150 400 750 4 Business District 25.4 505 1,532 1,900 - 100 150 5 Mixed Use Civic/Office Core District 23.3 100 900 1,000 - 200 300 6 Main Street District 34.7 80 240 400 100 533 800 7 Eastern Gateway District 9.6 - - - 50 200 300 8 Southwestern Neighborhood District 12.5 2 50 200 300 500 700 9 Central Southern Neighborhood District 24.4 - 45 100 130 500 650 10 Southeastern Neighborhood District 23.6 - 150 200 200 200 450 Total 206.6 799 3,487 1,080 2,983 Non-Residential (1,000 SF)Residential DUs Adopted Land Use Intensities P a g e | 5 As seen in the tables above, the proposed residential intensities are unchanged in the high column and have increased by 156 units in the low. The non-residential intensity is reduced by 163,000 in the high and increased 769,000 in the low. The applicant suggests that market conditions, other development entitlements approved by the City in Otay Ranch, and changes in the nature of office and retail development necessitate the reduction of the high non-residential. The proposal doesn’t modify any of the boundaries of any of the land use districts, or reduce the acreage of land available for employment uses. A discussion of the job generation of the proposed amendment is included in the discussion of the Developer Agreement. Land Use Intensity Transfers Since the ability for the developer to increase above the target through transfers up to the high has been removed in the proposed amendment, new language is proposed in Section 04.05.003 on page IV-12, to retain flexibility between districts, allowing an increase up to 10% to occur administratively over the high intensity as long as an equal amount is transferred or deducted from another District with the ultimate maximum build being maintained. Any proposal more than 10% would require the same Zoning Administrator findings. In addition, an exception for District 4 is proposed to build at 500,000 square feet instead of the designated 800,000 in the revised intensity table, providing that an ultimate block plan is submitted at time of project processing, showing that the additional 300,000 can be provided in the future. This provides flexibility for the Millenia Office space to evolve over time and meet market demands. 2. Main Street District (6) The Main Street District is the mixed-use heart of the Millenia plan. The current plan envisions an activated and vibrant mixed-use environment with ground floor commercial uses and residential or office uses above. Horizontal mixed use is also permitted. The terminus of the Main Street District is Metro Park, a 2.28-acre privately owned and maintained (but publicly accessible) park. The land uses currently in the plan for the Main Street District is a target of 240,000 square feet of commercial uses, with a low of 80,000 square feet and a high end of 400,000 square feet. The Applicant indicates that the current retail market is not expected to be able to absorb the amount of retail which is currently required for this district in the timeframe in which the Applicant expects the Main Street to develop, and is therefore proposing to modify the amount and distribution of commercial uses in the Main Street District. The table below provides a comparison of the existing and proposed land use intensities for District 6. District Description Acreage Low Target High Low Target High 1 Gateway Mixed Use Commercial District 22.7 227 400 - 89 2 Northwestern Neighborhood District 13.2 2 2 273 273 3 Northeastern Neighborhood District 17.2 2 5 150 475 4 Business District*25.4 800 1,900 - 225 5 Mixed Use Civic/Office Core District 23.3 455 900 - 300 6 Main Street District 34.7 80 100 100 601 7 Eastern Gateway District 9.6 - - 100 117 8 Southwestern Neighborhood District 12.5 2 2 253 253 9 Central Southern Neighborhood District 24.4 - 5 130 350 10 Southeastern Neighborhood District 23.6 - 10 230 300 Total 206.6 1,568 - 3,324 1,236 - 2,983 Non-Residential (1,000 SF)Residential DUs Proposed Land Use Intensities P a g e | 6 In order to ensure that the Main Street area remains flexible to evolve staff and the applicant agreed upon updates to Section 2.04.003 to require that the ground floor be built to accommodate commercial uses in the future through specific thresholds and buildings standards for live work units and commercial space. In addition, interim uses are allowed in this space to provide flexibility at initial build. While the low will remain the same as the existing plan, the high would be reduced for both residential and non-residential. Staff feels the development standard changes will retain the pedestrian oriented vibrancy intended for this District. 3. Design Standard Modifications Building Heights The FBC regulates building heights based on the concepts of minimum, maximum and average heights. It further identifies the minimum height by either allowable stories or feet. The plan is divided into a series of building height districts, each of which prescribe a minimum average building height which must be met on the lots within the district. As an example, within a five-story building height district, it would be possible to build four story buildings as long as five or six story buildings were also constructed, such that the average building height within the height district averaged out to five stories. Two amendments are requested to the Regulating Plan in the FBC (reference Attachment 2 - Exhibit III-49 on page III-69), as follows: 1. Reduction in Average Height for Six Lots: The Applicant is proposing to modify the Regulating Plan, to reduce the minimum average stories from five to four stories on six lots (SPA Plan Lots 10, 13, 19, 22-24). This change would affect approximately 7% of the acreage in the overall project, as follows: Lot 10 - existing five story affordable housing development (Duetta and Volta); Lot 13 - undeveloped; Lots 19 and 22 - owned by Applicant and currently being processed as a four-story product (“Pinnacle”); and Lots 23 and 24 - owned by Applicant and undeveloped. The Applicant indicates that a five-story residential product is not viable in the current market. If the proposed amendment is not approved and Lots 19 and 22 are developed with the current proposed project Pinnacle, Lots 23 and 24 would be obligated to be built at a minimum of six stories to meet the average height requirements in the approved FBC. The Applicant has provided representative imagery in the SPA Amendment for the four-story product to demonstrate that the reduction in Minimum Average Height from five to four-stories Low Target High Low Target High Existing SPA 100 533 800 80 240 400 Proposed Amendment 100 N/A 601 80 N/A 100 Difference 0 N/A -199 0 N/A -300 Residential (Units) Non-Residential (thousands of square feet) Main Street District Land Use Changes P a g e | 7 will still provide both a compatible massing with adjacent existing and proposed development and a pedestrian-oriented experience. 2. Modifications to Residential Minimum Building Height: As the height requirements can be met via either the number of stories or the building heights in feet, the Applicant is also proposing to differentiate between residential and non-residential heights and modify the approved minimum building height for residential. The proposed minimum heights and difference between the existing and proposed building height requirement table are shown below and on Exhibit III-49 (page III-69) of the proposed FBC amendments and summarized in the table below. All future buildings will still be required to comply with the Building Typologies and the Architectural Design Guidelines of the Millenia plan. Further, the proposed reduction in Minimum Average Height will not compromise the ability of future development in this height district to continue to comply with the applicable principles and concepts. Height Blending Four lots sit south of Metro Park and are adjacent to the Regional Trail. The lots cross two regulatory districts (6 and 9) in the SPA. The concept of height blending has been introduced in the proposed amendment on page III-68 of the FBC in order to allow the combination of 3- and 4-story heights across land in the two districts if one comprehensive project is proposed. Building Setbacks A deviation from setbacks has been added on page III-77 of the FBC to allow properties that may have slope or grade differences, as well as unique operational characteristics. An example of the need for this setback deviations is the proposed Fire Station to be located at the corner of Millenia Avenue and Stylus Street. Associated Regulatory Documents Public Facilities Finance Plan (PFFP) A PFFP has been prepared as a supplemental document to the original PFFP dated October 6, 2009 (see Public Facilities Finance Plan, Attachment 3). The Supplemental PFFP analyzes the changes to the ultimate buildout land use intensities, any potential impacts on public facilities and services, and identifies the facilities, phasing and timing triggers for the provision of facilities and services to serve the project, consistent with the City’s Quality of Life Threshold Standards. The analysis concludes that the proposed reduction in buildout land use intensities would not negatively impact any of the applicable thresholds or standards. It should be noted that the Supplemental PFFP is relatively simple as the Applicant has agreed Stories Approved SPA Proposed Amendment Approved SPA Proposed Amendment 1 25 25 25 25 2 35 30 25 35 3 40 35 40 40 4 Not identified 45 Not identified 50 5 70 55 70 70 Residential Heigth in Feet Non-Residential Heigth in Feet Minimum Building Height (Sq. Ft.) Changes P a g e | 8 to comply with all prior conditions of the Millenia plan, including all required EIR mitigation measures, despite the proposed reduction in buildout intensities in the plan. As previously described, development of Millenia is underway, and much of the “backbone” infrastructure has been installed per the original PFFP. As a result, the mitigation measures identified in the PFFP remain unchanged from the original project proposal (no reduction in mitigation measures as a result of the potential reduced buildout). Consistent with the original PFFP, the Developer entered into an agreement entitled “Agreement Regarding Construction of Parks in a Portion of the Otay Ranch Eastern Urban Center”, as part of the original entitlements (the “Parks Agreement”). The Parks Agreement was subsequently amended twice, once in 2015 and once in 2016. The current Parks Agreement provides for park facilities assuming a build-out of 2,983 residential units (but contemplates the possibility of 2,550 units). No amendment to the Parks Agreement is proposed at this time. Should the Master Developer construct fewer than 2,550 residential units, further amendment of the Parks Agreement may be requested. Fiscal Impact Analysis (FIA) The Applicant’s proposal includes a revised Fiscal Impact Analysis (FIA) evaluating the proposed amendment (see Fiscal Impact Analysis, Attachment 4). This FIA has been prepared using the City’s new fiscal model which was first provided to the Applicant in October of last year. Staff worked with the Applicant who provided the necessary project-specific inputs to the plan needed to calculate the City’s maintenance costs. It is important to note that the FIA presents a projection of the anticipated fiscal impacts of the development, based upon the best information currently available. Actual fiscal impacts as a result of development may vary from model outcomes. The FIA evaluates the following scenarios: 1. Proposed Amendment Maximum Buildout - This scenario assumes development of the proposed maximum buildout, including 2,550 residential units and 3.115 million square feet of non- residential uses. The non-residential uses assumed include approximately 2.55 million square feet of office, 388,000 square feet of retail uses, 130,000 square feet of civic uses (school and fire station), and a single 135-room hotel. 2. 2009 Adopted Plan Maximum Buildout (assumes 500 hotel rooms) - This scenario assumes development of the adopted maximum building, including 2,983 residential units and 3.487 million square feet of non-residential uses. The non-residential uses assumed in the 2009 plan include approximately 2.0 million square feet of office, approximately 800,000 square feet of retail uses, 160,000 square feet of civic uses, and two hotels totaling 500 rooms. 3. 2009 Adopted Plan with reduced Hotel (assumes 135 hotel rooms) - In recognition of the fact that since the original Millenia entitlements were approved the City has approved three hotels in addition to the one approved in Millenia - this scenario looks at the 2009 full build scenario but includes only the 135-room hotel currently under construction (reduction of 365 hotel rooms). Based on the FIA and the assumptions contained therein, all of the scenarios above are projected to generate a positive net fiscal impact to the City by year two (2019/2020). The relative fiscal performance of the three scenarios over a 30-year buildout term are compared in the table below. P a g e | 9 Comparison of Modeled Fiscal Impact Scenarios (Annual Net Impact, Millions) Year 5 Year 10 Year 15 Year 20 Year 25 Year 30 Proposed Amendment (135 Hotel Rooms) Revenues $ 4.7 $ 7.7 $ 8.7 $ 9.8 $ 11.3 $ 13.1 Expenses $ (3.2)$ (6.3)$ (7.1)$ (7.3)$ (7.4)$ (7.6) Net Impact $ 1.5 $ 1.4 $ 1.5 $ 2.6 $ 3.8 $ 5.5 2009 Adopted Plan (135 Hotel Rooms) Revenues $ 2.4 $ 6.0 $ 9.9 $ 12.0 $ 13.8 $ 15.4 Expenses $ (2.1)$ (4.8)$ (7.2)$ (7.4)$ (7.6)$ (7.7) Net Impact $ 0.3 $ 1.1 $ 2.7 $ 4.6 $ 6.2 $ 7.7 2009 Adopted Plan (500 Hotel Rooms) Revenues $ 2.4 $ 7.6 $ 11.7 $ 14.0 $ 15.9 $ 17.7 Expenses $ (2.0)$ (4.8)$ (7.2)$ (7.4)$ (7.6)$ (7.7) Net Impact $ 0.3 $ 2.8 $ 4.5 $ 6.5 $ 8.3 $ 10.0 The Proposed Amendment (135 Hotel Room) scenario assumes development phasing as summarized in the table below. *Note: Civic uses are assumed to have no net fiscal impact and are therefore excluded. The Proposed Amendment phasing assumptions can be compared with the assumptions in the 2009 Adopted Plan fiscal analysis, summarized in the table below. Overall, comparing projected net annual fiscal impacts in year 30 for the 2009 Adopted Plan and the Proposed Amendment ($10.0 million and $5.5 million, respectively) indicates a $4.5 million reducedannual positive fiscal impact. It is important to note that a key driver reducing the fiscal benefit to the City between the Proposed Amendment scenario and the 2009 Adopted Plan scenario is Transient Occupancy Taxes, and the fact that the City’s model attributes very little service costs to hotels. At year 30, approximately $2.3 million of the projected net fiscal benefit associated with the 2009 Adopted Maximum Buildout Scenario is attributable to the 365 additional hotel rooms assumed under that scenario. This is a relevant comparison as it recognizes that the City has not lost the TOT revenues, but rather those revenues Year 5 Year 10 Year 15 Year 20 Year 25 Year 30 Residential Units 1,596 2,983 2,983 2,983 2,983 2,983 Hotel Rooms 135 135 135 135 135 135 Retail & Hotel SF 325,388 388,846 388,846 388,846 388,846 388,846 Office SF 688,500 1,581,000 1,657,500 1,810,500 2,040,000 2,550,000 Total Non-Residential SF 1,013,888 1,969,846 2,046,346 2,199,346 2,428,846 2,938,846 Proposed Amendment Development Phasing Assumptions* Year 5 Year 7 Year 12 Year 17 Year 22 1,245 1,743 2,983 2,983 2,983 250 500 500 500 500 187,500 375,000 375,000 375,000 375,000 73,850 221,550 738,500 883,400 980,000 88,650 265,950 886,500 1,552,200 1,996,000 350,000 862,500 2,000,000 2,810,600 3,351,000 Retail SF Office SF Total Non-Residential SF 2009 Adopted Plan Development Phasing Assumptions Residential Units Hotel Rooms Hotel SF P a g e | 10 have been relocated to other locations in the Eastern Territories where hotels have been added since the entitlements for Millenia were approved in 2009. Addendum to FEIR 07-01 Section 21002 of the CEQA requires that an environmental impact report identify the significant effects of a project on the environment and provide measures or alternatives that can mitigate or avoid those significant effects. The Millenia SPA was analyzed in the previously adopted Final Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern Urban Center (Millenia) Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan (FEIR 07-01) (SCH #2007041074). Previous Addendums were prepared for two prior SPA Plan Amendments. The First Addendum to the FEIR was approved as part of an amendment to modify building heights and land uses affecting the Genesis project in March of 2013. The second Addendum to the FEIR analyzed the impact of relocating the school site and modify building height boundaries associated with the Millenia Commons retail project. As a result of the analysis of the proposed amendment, the basic conclusions and impacts identified in FEIR 07-01 were determined to not have changed. The land use and public service impacts are found to be less than significant for the current proposed plan amendments and were adequately covered in FEIR 07-01. Therefore, in accordance with Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines, the City has prepared the third Addendum to the FEIR(see Environmental Impact Report Addendum, Attachment 5). Developer Agreement A Developer Agreement (DA) was recorded on October 27, 2009 as Document No. 2009-0595116 of Official Records in the Office of the San Diego County Recorder. Because of the material change being proposed by the developer to reduce the total amount of development, an amendment to the original DA, (see First Amendment to the Developer Agreement, Attachment 6), documenting this reduction is required and the two changes to the public benefit documented as follows: 1. Net Revenue - The first benefit identified in the existing DA was annual net revenue over the cost of providing municipal services of approximately $5.0 million in buildout year 22. As shown above, the updated fiscal impact analysis using a more current fiscal model shows that the original project could have resulted in estimated annual net revenues of $10.0 million in year 30. Applying this new fiscal model to the proposed project amendment, including the reduced non-residential development, the estimated annual net revenue is projected to be approximately $5.5 million in year 30. While this equates to a reduction of $4.5 million annually from the approved plan, it still represents a significant positive fiscal impact to the City’s General Fund. 2. Job Generation - The second benefit identified was that the completed project would generate approximately 9,206 jobs with 3.487 million square feet of commercial space. With a reduction of the maximum non-residential development to 3.324 million square feet, the opportunity to maintain over 8,700 jobs is provided by the amendment. DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT Staff has reviewed the property holdings of the City Council and has found that no City Council Member has property holdings within 500 feet of the boundaries of the property which is the subject of this action. Consequently, this item does not represent a disqualifying real property-related financial conflict of interest under California Code of Regulations Title 2, section 18702.2(a)(11), for purposes of the Political Reform Act (Cal. Gov. Code section 87100 et seq.). Staff is not independently aware, nor has staff been informed by any City Council Member, of any other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter. P a g e | 11 LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS The City’s Strategic Plan has five major goals: Operational Excellence, Economic Vitality, Healthy Community, Strong and Secure Neighborhoods and a Connected Community. The Millenia Project supports the Economic Vitality goal, particularly City Initiative 2.1.3 (Promote and support development of quality master-planned communities). The subsequent SPA Plan amendment implementation documents (the SPA Plan, Master Precise Plan, and TSM) support the development of a high-quality master-planned community (as described above) with a park, jobs, transit, shopping, and other amenities, all within walking distance for residents. The Project implements the Strong and Secure Neighborhoods Strategic goal by providing construction of a development project in a manner that ensures code compliance, public health and safety of the community. CURRENT-YEAR FISCAL IMPACT All costs associated with preparing and processing the SPA Plan amendment and all supporting documents were borne by the developer, resulting in no net fiscal impact to the General Fund or the Development Services Fund. ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT As discussed in the Fiscal Impact Analysis section of this report, the Proposed Amendment is projected to result in net positive fiscal impacts throughout the development period, ranging from $1.5 million to $5.5 million annually. Cumulative impacts of the Proposed Amendment buildout scenario during the term of the 30-year analysis are anticipated to total approximately $69.8 million, with an annual average positive impact of $2.3 million. The table below summarizes the projected annual net fiscal impact for representative buildout years for the Proposed Amendment, the 2009 Adopted Plan as originally approved (assuming 500 hotel rooms), and the 2009 Adopted Plan (assuming only the 135 hotel rooms constructed to date). Comparison of Modeled Fiscal Impact Scenarios (Annual Net Impact, Millions) Year 5 Year 10 Year 15 Year 20 Year 25 Year 30 Proposed Amendment (135 Hotel Rooms) Revenues $ 4.7 $ 7.7 $ 8.7 $ 9.8 $ 11.3 $ 13.1 Expenses $ (3.2)$ (6.3)$ (7.1)$ (7.3)$ (7.4)$ (7.6) Net Impact $ 1.5 $ 1.4 $ 1.5 $ 2.6 $ 3.8 $ 5.5 2009 Adopted Plan (135 Hotel Rooms) Revenues $ 2.4 $ 6.0 $ 9.9 $ 12.0 $ 13.8 $ 15.4 Expenses $ (2.1)$ (4.8)$ (7.2)$ (7.4)$ (7.6)$ (7.7) Net Impact $ 0.3 $ 1.1 $ 2.7 $ 4.6 $ 6.2 $ 7.7 2009 Adopted Plan (500 Hotel Rooms) Revenues $ 2.4 $ 7.6 $ 11.7 $ 14.0 $ 15.9 $ 17.7 Expenses $ (2.0)$ (4.8)$ (7.2)$ (7.4)$ (7.6)$ (7.7) Net Impact $ 0.3 $ 2.8 $ 4.5 $ 6.5 $ 8.3 $ 10.0 As illustrated in the table above, reducing the hotel rooms assumed to be developed by 365 decreases the projected annual positive impact in year 30 by approximately $2.3 million. This accounts for just over 50% of the total projected positive impact reduction in year 30 resulting from the Proposed Amendment. Additional adjustments to the development plan further reduce the year 30 projected net positive fiscal benefit from $10.0 million (2009 Adopted Plan with 500 hotel rooms) to $5.5 million. While a comparison of the Proposed Amendment with the 2009 Adopted Plan (with 500 hotel rooms) indicates reduced positive impacts of approximately $4.5 million annually in year 30, the plan continues to indicate significant net positive impacts to the City’s General Fund as a result of the Millenia project. P a g e | 12 When considering the above, it is important to note that the Fiscal Impact Analysis presents projections based upon the best information currently available. Actual fiscal impacts as a result of this development may vary from those indicated by the model. Pursuant to Section 4.5 (Operating Deficit) of the Millenia Development Agreement, the Master Developer will cover the City’s net operating deficit during the initial years of the project (excluding fire services), up to a cumulative maximum of $500,000. The amount of the deficit is to be determined via a fiscal study to be prepared by the City at the Master Developer’s cost. Per the Development Agreement, the first fiscal analysis “shall be conducted following the end of the fiscal year which is two (2) years following the first occupancy within the Property, and annually thereafter at the end of each fiscal year.” The first Millenia certificate of occupancy was issued to Fairfield Residential, on October 23, 2015. Based upon this date, the first fiscal analysis shall be conducted after June 30, 2018. Initiation of the first fiscal analysis is expected in July of 2018. ATTACHMENTS 1. Locator Map 2. EUC SPA Amendment Project Description and Form Based Code (FBC) 3. Public Facilities Finance Plan (PFFP) 4. Fiscal Impact Analysis (FIA) 5. Environmental Impact Report Addendum 6. First Amendment to the Developer Agreement (DA) Staff Contact: Stacey Kurz, Senior Project Coordinator ATTACHMENT 1 Project Locator Map Millenia / EUC Project Description for the Proposed Amendment to Millenia Sectional Planning Area Plan (SPA) June 28, 2018 Project Sponsor/Applicant: SLF IV – Millenia, LLC Millenia Real Estate Group 9988 Hibert Street, Suite 210 San Diego, CA 92131 Contact: Todd Galarneau (619) 794-1205 tgalarneau@meridiandevelopment.com Prepared by: Cinti Land Planning 3639 Midway Dr., #340 San Diego, CA 92110 Contact: Gary P. Cinti (619) 223-7408 gary@cinti.com Millenia Amendment A. Background and Context of Proposed Project The proposed project, Otay Ranch Eastern Urban Center (now known as Millenia) Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan, is located within the Otay Ranch Planned Community in eastern Chula Vista. The Otay Ranch General Development Plan (GDP) was initially adopted in 1993 to guide the development of the planned community through incremental SPA plans. The Otay Ranch GDP and the Millenia SPA Plan have been amended several times since adoption in response to changes and experiences in the market. Originally, Millenia was intended to provide the location for high intensity uses, with the other Villages providing neighborhood serving centrally located Village Cores. Since, the original GDP was approved a number high intensity development areas have approved in the Otay Valley portion of Otay Ranch in addition to Millenia. When the plan for the Eastern Urban Center was first adopted, the internet didn’t exist, so if you wanted to buy the year’s hot toy, the Beanie Baby, you had to go to a store to buy it. You could not use your smart phone to call the store because the iPhone did not exist. It is projected that it will take a similar period of time - twenty plus years or more - to fully build-out Millenia. Just as central business districts and cities evolve over time, so will Millenia. The initial phase is only the first stage of the ultimate development. The intent of this amendment is to update the adopted plan to reflect the initial phases of development and to respond to market changes, while ensuring a degree of flexibility is maintained such that the plan can still respond to future market and lifestyle changes that are difficult or impossible to predict. In the original GDP the Otay Ranch GDP had a series of Villages with a central core that contained neighborhood serving commercial, a park and school and the higher densities. Millenia provided the single area where the highest density residential and regional commercial were located. The Otay Ranch Plan has evolved significantly since its initial adoption in 1993. In fact, since the Millenia plan was adopted in 2009, virtually every remaining village in the Otay Valley portion of the plan, has been fundamentally re-planned and those re-planning efforts continue to this day. The (6/28/2018) Millenia Amendment following Exhibits graphically depict how the GDP has changed over time. Conversely, there have been four minor amendments to the Millenia plan since its adoption; however, the intensity and distribution of land uses remained relatively unchanged. More significant changes occurred in the villages. Instead of having local serving neighborhood core, higher density residential increased dramatically. The total number of multi-family units was increased by over 50%. This increase resulted in significant competition to Millenia within this market area. Millenia was no longer the primary location for multi-family residential. Additionally, the non-residential components of the GDP have changed dramatically. In the original GDP the villages only had neighborhood commercial serving the local village. The current plan includes larger commercial areas located external to the village cores at arterial intersections. The type, size, and location of these commercial areas allows them to compete directly with Millenia to attract community and regional commercial uses. And, with the addition by the City of the Regional Technology Park (University Park and Innovation District), and significant commercial components added to other villages, the role of the Millenia plan as the central hub for future offices uses in the Eastern Territories has been altered. Creating an urban center in a suburban location always has challenges, but the dispersal of high intensity urban uses is in direct competition to achieving the original intent of Millenia as being the (6/28/2018) Millenia Amendment central urban center. Millenia previously had to compete with urban cores in the San Diego region, but now the competition is within the GDP itself. The result of the increased multi-family, commercial, and office within the GDP has changed the Millenia’s competitive advantage and will likely hamper or delay its ability to achieve it’s build-out goals. The proposed amendment recognizes the impact of this disadvantage, as well as the successes achieved in the initial phases of construction, in the build-out land use projections for Millenia. (6/28/2018) Millenia Amendment B. Summary Description Millenia is currently being implemented with almost a dozen projects completed, under construction, approved, or in the Design Review phase of development. These projects include City parks, a hotel, office, retail, and affordable, rental, mixed-use and for-sale residential, representing virtually every land use type contemplated in the plan. Seventy percent of the private development land has been contracted with merchant builders. Since the SPA Plan was first approved in 2009, it has been amended four times in response to changes in public and private influences and actual market experiences. The applicant, SLF IV – Millenia, LLC, is the owner and Master Developer of Millenia. The applicant has agreed to implement all the mitigation measures adopted in the certified EIR, even though the project build-out proposed by this amendment may be less than the maximum intensity allowed. The adopted project implementation documents were designed to allow implementation flexibility using a Form Based Code format. Two provisions of the code were adopted with less flexible prescriptive standards. These include; the maximum/minimum intensity requirements in the Site Utilization Plan and, the minimum height standards for certain areas in the FBC. Based on experiences discovered during implementation, minor amendments to these standards to allow flexibility will enhance the ability of Millenia to be developed with the intended character. The Site Utilization Plan included a maximum intensity for residential and non-residential development. The unusual feature of these standards was the maximum appeared to be the minimum. Any development at build-out that would not achieve the exact maximum intensity would have appeared to be inconsistent with code. This amendment corrects this provision by allowing a reduced intensity for build-out of the plan for both residential and commercial land uses. The amendments to the SUP also reflect a re-distribution of the remaining commercial land uses to reflect what is expected to be achievable in the short and mid-term retail market. The other provision in the code, proposed for amendment, is the minimum height standards for six residential parcels designated as five story minimum. A five story residential project has a number of practical restrictions, which would constrain the critical initial project momentum. These parcels are being amended to a new four story designation. Additionally, the permitted height minimums are being adjusted in several of the districts to reflect more contemporary building forms expected in those districts. To facilitate more comprehensive planning and to allow for more latitude in project design and implementation of the main street concepts, the application also introduces the concept of height blending between TM Lots 17 and 18 in the Main Street District and Lots 23 and 24 in the Central Southern Neighborhood District. Illustrations have been added to show how various building features can be used to create building height. Most of the districts in Millenia are fairly straight forward from a regulatory perspective, but the design guidelines for the Main Street District have always been the most challenging. Since, the original guidelines were adopted the market and evolution of this type of development have evolved. During the initial plan development, a number of projects were reviewed that tried to create a “Main Street” component in their plan. Some were successful, but many suffered from a failed “build it and they will come” approach. The worst thing that can happen is the Main Street to be built and (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project Description have numerous vacant store fronts. Such an outcome would not achieve the goal of providing an active, vibrant environment, and worse still, would stigmatize the remainder of the plan. What is included in the proposed guidelines, is a Main Street plan which provides for ground floor commercial uses, including strategically placed commercial nodes located at intersections, mid- block commercial, live/work opportunities, and creative office and dedicated retail space on the south. East and west sides of the Town Center Park. The intent of this concept is to correctly size, and geographically distribute the commercial uses in the Main Street District to create the intended character while addressing the need for supply of commercial to evolve with demand, avoiding the potential for vacant storefronts or underperforming, or marginal retail uses. Some design illustrations of the proposed Main Street District guidelines are included after the Site Utilization Plan and Height District Exhibits. The primary exhibits proposed for amendment are provided on the following pages. Adopted exhibits are shown with diagonal line across the exhibit and labeled as “Adopted”. Proposed replacement exhibits are designated as “Proposed”. The application process will involve discussions on the format of the proposed amendment. Following these initial discussions, the related text changes can be completed. These minor details and refinements would not change the impact of the amendment. The application materials being submitted also include a retail market study and a fiscal study, which analyzes the most conservative target land use scenario. It is also anticipated that a Supplemental Public Facilities Financing Plan (PFFP) will be required. That document will be provided once the target and reserve land uses are determined. (6/28/2018) (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project Description Eastern Urban Center (EUC) Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Otay Ranch GDP Adopted September 15, 2009 by Resolution No. 2009-224 Amended March 5, 2013 by Resolution 2013-03 Amended August 9, 2016 by Resolution 2016-170 Amended December 6, 2016 by Resolution No. 2016-262 and by reference to Ordinance No. 3397, dated December 13, 2016 strikeout = text deleted redline= text added Note: Some Page number may vary from adopted documents Draft 6/28/2018 Project Sponsor: SLF IV – Millenia, LLC Millenia Real Estate Group 9988 Hibert Street, Suite 210 San Diego, CA 92131 Contact: Todd Galarneau (619) 794-1205 tgalarneau@meridiandevelopment.com Prepared by: Cinti Land Planning 3639 Midway Dr. #340 San Diego, CA 92110 Contact: Gary P. Cinti (619) 223-7408 gary@cinti.com (6/28/2018) (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project Description (6/28/2018) (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project Description (6/28/2018) (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project Description (6/28/2018) (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project Description (6/28/2018) (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project DescriptionMILLENIA Amendment - Project Description PC DISTRICT REGULATIONS & VILLAGE DESIGN PLAN Eastern Urban Center Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Otay Ranch GDP Adopted October 6, 2009 by Resolution No. 2009-224 and by Ordinance No. 3142 Amended March 5, 2013 by Resolution No. 2013-038 and by Ordinance No. 3257 Amended August 9, 2016 by Resolution 2016-170 and by Ordinance 3372 on August 16, 2016 Amended December 6, 2016 by Resolution 2016-261 and by Ordinance No. 3397 on December 13, 2016 DRAFT AMENDMENT strikeout = text deleted redline= text added Note: Some Page number may vary from adopted documents 6/28/2018 Project Sponsor: SLF IV – Millenia, LLC Millenia Real Estate Group 9988 Hibert Street, Suite 210 San Diego, CA 92131 Contact: Todd Galarneau (619) 794-1205 tgalarneau@meridiandevelopment.com Prepared by: Cinti Land Planning 3639 Midway Dr. #340 San Diego, CA 92110 Contact: Gary P. Cinti (619) 223-7408 gary@cinti.com (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project Description (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project DescriptionMILLENIA Amendment - Project Description (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project Description (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project DescriptionMILLENIA Amendment - Project Description (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project Description (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project DescriptionMILLENIA Amendment - Project Description (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project Description (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project DescriptionMILLENIA Amendment - Project Description (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project Description (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project DescriptionMILLENIA Amendment - Project Description (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project Description (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project DescriptionMILLENIA Amendment - Project Description (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project Description (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project DescriptionMILLENIA Amendment - Project Description (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project Description (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project DescriptionMILLENIA Amendment - Project Description (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project Description (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project DescriptionMILLENIA Amendment - Project Description (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project Description (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project DescriptionMILLENIA Amendment - Project Description (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project Description (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project DescriptionMILLENIA Amendment - Project Description (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project Description (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project DescriptionMILLENIA Amendment - Project Description (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project Description (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project DescriptionMILLENIA Amendment - Project Description (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project Description (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project DescriptionMILLENIA Amendment - Project Description (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project Description (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project DescriptionMILLENIA Amendment - Project Description (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project Description (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project DescriptionMILLENIA Amendment - Project Description (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project Description (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project DescriptionMILLENIA Amendment - Project Description (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project Description (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project DescriptionMILLENIA Amendment - Project Description (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project Description (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project DescriptionMILLENIA Amendment - Project Description (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project Description (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project DescriptionMILLENIA Amendment - Project Description (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project Description (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project DescriptionMILLENIA Amendment - Project Description (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project Description (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project DescriptionMILLENIA Amendment - Project Description (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project Description (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project DescriptionMILLENIA Amendment - Project Description (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project Description (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project DescriptionMILLENIA Amendment - Project Description (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project Description (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project DescriptionMILLENIA Amendment - Project Description (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project Description (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project DescriptionMILLENIA Amendment - Project Description (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project Description (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project DescriptionMILLENIA Amendment - Project Description (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project Description (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project DescriptionMILLENIA Amendment - Project Description (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project Description (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project DescriptionMILLENIA Amendment - Project Description (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project Description (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project DescriptionMILLENIA Amendment - Project Description (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project Description (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project DescriptionMILLENIA Amendment - Project Description (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project Description (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project DescriptionMILLENIA Amendment - Project Description (6/28/2018) MILLENIA Amendment - Project Description (6/28/2018) Millenia Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan Public Facilities Finance Plan (PFFP) Supplemental PFFP for 2018 SPA Plan Amendment DRAFT June 28, 2018 Applicant: SLF IV - Millenia, LLC Meridian Development 9988 Hilbert Street, Suite 210 San Diego, CA 92131 Contact: Todd Galarneau 619-794-1204 tgalarneau@meridiandevelopment.com Prepared by: Jay Kniep Land Planning Contact: Jay Kniep 530-541-1817 jaykniep@cs.com APPROVED: Chula Vista City Council Resolution 2018-XXX TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I.OVERVIEW.............................................................1 II.PURPOSE...............................................................2 III.BASIS of the ANALYSIS..................................................3 IV.DEVELOPMENT PHASING................................................5 V.DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE PROGRAMS.................................5 VI.TRAFFIC...............................................................7 VII.POLICE.................................................................7 VIII.FIRE & EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES.................................7 IX.SCHOOLS..............................................................7 X.LIBRARIES.............................................................8 XI.PARKS, TRAILS & OPEN SPACE...........................................8 XII.WATER................................................................9 XIII.SEWER.................................................................9 XIV.DRAINAGE.............................................................9 XV.AIR QUALITY..........................................................10 XVI.CIVIC CENTER.........................................................10 XVII. CORPORATION YARD..................................................10 XVIII. OTHER PUBLIC FACILITIES............................................10 XIX.FISCAL ANALYSIS.....................................................11 XX.PUBLIC FACILITY FINANCE.............................................11 EXHIBIT LIST Page 1.Proposed Millenia Site Utilization Plan.....................................4 TABLES 1.Revised Table B.6 Transportation DIF Schedule..............................6 2.Revised Table B.7 Public Facilities Estimated DIF Fee Components..............6 Millenia Supplemental PFFP I.OVERVIEW This Supplemental Public Facility Finance Plan (PFFP) addresses the public facility needs associated with the current amendment to the Millenia (previously known as the Eastern Urban Area or EUC) Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan. This PFFP has been prepared under the requirements of the City of Chula Vista's Growth Management Program and Chapter 9, Growth Management, of the Otay Ranch GDP. The preparation of a PFFP is required in conjunction with the preparation of the SPA Plan to ensure that the development of the project is consistent with the overall goals and policies of the City's General Plan, Growth Management Program, and the Otay Ranch GDP. This Supplemental Public Facility Finance Plan (Supplemental PFFP) addresses changes to the public facility needs associated with the Millenia SPA Plan Amendment. This Supplemental PFFP is based upon the project information provided in the Project Description for the Millenia SPA Plan amendment prepared by Cinti Land Planning dated June 18, 2018. The proposed amendment includes the following elements: 1.Elimination of the “target” land use intensity category. The amendment retains the adopted maximums of 2,983 residential units and 3.324 million square feet of commercial land uses and will allow, but not require, site development up to these maximums. 2.A revised Main Street concept focused on revisions to the quantity and distribution of commercial land uses in the Main Street District. 3.A reduction and blending of height regulations for certain lots including the addition of a four story height category. The adopted Millenia SPA Plan is currently being implemented with almost a dozen projects completed, under construction, approved, or in the Design Review phase of development. These projects include City parks, fire station and pedestrian bridge, a hotel, office, retail, and affordable, rental, mixed-use and for-sale residential, which cumulatively represent virtually every land use type contemplated in the plan. Seventy percent of the private development land has been contracted with merchant builders. Since the SPA Plan was first approved in 2009, it has been amended four times in response to changes in public and private influences and actual market experiences. The adopted Site Utilization Plan (SUP) included a maximum build for residential and non-residential development. The unusual feature of these standards was that the maximum appeared to also be the minimum. With this interpretation, any development at build-out that would not achieve the exact maximum build would be inconsistent with adopted plan. This provision is currently inhibiting implementation of the project. The proposed SPA Plan amendment corrects this by allowing a reduced intensity for build-out of the plan for both residential and commercial land uses. (06/28/18)1 Millenia Supplemental PFFP The applicant, SLF IV – Millenia, LLC, is the owner and Master Developer of Millenia. The applicant has agreed to implement all the mitigation measures adopted in the certified EIR, even though the project build-out proposed by this amendment may be less than the maximum build allowed and which is the basis for the public facility capacities incorporated into the project. Because a reduced intensity project would be within the parameters of the impact assumptions of the approved project, and the applicant is not requesting relief from any of the approved mitigation measures, no new environmental analysis or technical facility analyses are necessary for this project. The infrastructure provided with the project is based on the maximum build permitted intensity of 3,324,000 square feet of non-residential uses and 2,983 dwelling units, notwithstanding the low-range build-out projections shown on the proposed Site Utilization Plan (Exhibit 1). Traffic, water, sewer, recycled water and storm drainage improvements will be built- out for the maximum build, as assessed in the original PFFP. Provision of population based facilities/services and impact fee payments will be determined by actual unit counts as the project is built-out. As noted above, development of Millenia is underway and much of the “backbone” infrastructure has been installed per the original PFFP as individual development sites have been prepared by the master developer for merchant builders. Because all of the public facility improvements and mitigation measures are unchanged from the original project approval, the scope of this Supplemental PFFP is limited. II.PURPOSE The purpose of all PFFPs in the City of Chula Vista is to implement the City’s Growth Management Program and to meet the Chula Vista General Plan goals and objectives, specifically those within the Growth Management Element. The Growth Management Program ensures that development occurs only when the necessary public facilities and services exist or are provided concurrent with the demands of new development. The Growth Management Program requires a PFFP be prepared for every new development project which requires either a SPA Plan or tentative map approval. Similarly, amendments to a SPA Plan may require an amendment or supplement to the PFFP. The purpose of this Supplemental PFFP is to update and clarify the original 2009 PFFP to address changes to the project identified above. In the City of Chula Vista, the PFFP is intended to ensure adequate levels of service are achieved for all public services and facilities impacted by a project. It is understood that assumed growth projections and related public facilities needs are subject to a number of external factors, such as the local economy, the City’s future land use approval decisions, etc. It is also understood that funding sources specified herein may change due to financing programs available in the future or requirements of either state or federal laws. It is intended that revisions to cost estimates and funding programs be handled as administrative revisions; whereas revisions to the facilities- driven growth phases are accomplished through an update process via an amendment or supplement to the PFFP. (06/28/18)2 Millenia Supplemental PFFP III.BASIS of the ANALYSIS The key statistical change associated with the proposed amendment is the elimination of target intensities for build-out of the plan for both residential and commercial land uses. The proposed development statistics are provided in the Proposed Site Utilization Plan provided as Exhibit 1. Because the original adopted PFFP already analyzes the maximum build-out scenario, new analyses are not required for the proposed amendment. This document briefly summaries and updates the Millenia SPA PFFP topics. (06/28/18)3 Millenia Supplemental PFFP EXHIBIT 1 (06/28/18)4 Millenia Supplemental PFFP IV.DEVELOPMENT PHASING The adopted Millenia SPA Plan is currently being implemented with almost a dozen projects completed, under construction, approved, or in the Design Review phase of development. These projects include City parks, fire station and pedestrian bridge, a hotel, office, retail, and affordable, rental, mixed-use and for-sale residential, which represents virtually every land use type contemplated in the plan. Seventy percent of the private development land has been contracted with merchant builders. The development of the Millenia SPA will continue to be implemented in four non-sequential phases as described in Conceptual Phasing Plan (Exhibit 5 of the original PFFP). Sequential phasing is frequently inaccurate because of unforeseen market changes or regulatory constraints. Therefore, the Millenia SPA Plan permits non-sequential phasing by imposing specific facilities requirements for each development increment regardless of which phase it is located. This will ensure that new Millenia SPA development is adequately served and City threshold standards are met. Construction of the major on-site streets, which serve multiple phases, shall be phased according to the provisions of the original PFFP, including Table B.4 on page 22 of that document. V.DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE PROGRAMS The project must continue to comply with various development impact fee programs of the City of Chula Vista to cover the costs of certain public improvements and facilities included in those fee programs. These fee programs include the Transportation Development Impact Fee (TDIF), the Traffic Signal Participation fee, the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee (PFDIF), the Parkland Acquisition and Development In-Lieu (PAD) fee, the Millenia Pedestrian Bridge impact fee program and the applicable sewer fee programs - the Salt Creek and Poggi Canyon sewer basin fee programs and the sewer capacity charge fee. All impact fee rates are subject to annual adjustments and proposed development will be required to pay the fee in effect at the time of approval, or alternatively satisfy the public facility and improvement obligation per the adopted Millenia Development Agreement or Parks Agreement as provided for in the project approvals. The current (effective 10/2017) Transportation DIF Schedule is provided in Table B.6 below which updates the corresponding table in the original PFFP. The current Millenia Pedestrian Bridge DIF amounts are Single Family - $615.13 per DU and Multi Family - $456.10 per DU. (06/28/18)5 Millenia Supplemental PFFP Revised Table B.6 Transportation DIF Schedule Land Use Classification TDIF Rate Residential (Low)0-6 dwelling units per gross $14,126 per DU Residential (Med.)6.1-18 dwelling units per gross $11,300 per DU Residential (High)>18.1 dwelling units per gross $8,475 per DU Senior housing $5,650 per DU Residential mixed use >18 dwelling units per gross $5,650 per DU Commercial mixed use < 5 stories in height $226,016 per 20,000 sq. General commercial $226,016 per acre Regional commercial > 60 acres or 800,000 sq. ft.$155,386 per acre High rise commercial > 5 stories in height $395,528 per acre Office (acre)< 5 stories in height $127,134 per acre Industrial (acre)$127,134 per acre 18-hole golf course $988,820 per acre Medical center $918,190 per acre The Public Facilities Development Impact Fee (PFDIF) is a separate development impact fee program to provide funds to improve a variety of city facilities which are impacted by additional growth. Both residential and non-residential development impact fees apply to the project. The current fee amounts applicable to additional development are presented in the updated Table B.7, Public Facilities DIF Components, below. Revised Table B.7 Public Facilities Estimated DIF Fee Components Component Single Family/DU Multi-Family/DU Commercial/Acre Industrial/Acre Civic Center $2,907 $2,754 $9,276 $2,931 Police $1,760 $1,901 $8,314 $1,793 Corporation Yard $472 $378 $8,038 $3,785 Libraries $1,671 $1,671 $0 $0 Fire Suppression $1,469 $1,057 $3,884 $773 GIS, Computers, Telecom & Records Management $0 $0 $0 $0 Administration $632 $598 $2,019 $638 Recreation $1,269 $1,269 $0 $0 Total/Residential Unit $10,180 $9,628 Total per Com’l / Ind. Ac.$31,531 $9,920 (06/28/18)6 Millenia Supplemental PFFP As noted previously, the applicant has agreed to construct all the improvements and mitigation measures as identified in the original approval and thus no revised facility analysis is warranted as part of this supplement. VI. TRAFFIC The SPA amendment does not propose changes to the circulation element roadways serving the Project, including internal street cross sections and alignments. Since the maximum build scenario in the proposed amendment is within approximately 5% of the maximum intensities approved in the original SPA plan, the external trip distribution patterns to the surrounding roadway network, including roadway segments, intersections, and freeway segments, will be consistent with those identified with the original approval. The amended project will comply with the all the traffic-related requirements and mitigation measures associated with the original approval. VII. POLICE The demand for additional police services is based on the amount of new development in a project. The amended project generates a similar demand for police services as identified in the original PFFP. Therefore, the project must comply with the requirements identified in the original PFFP (2009 PFFP, Page 81), adjusted to actual unit counts and will be adequately served. VIII.FIRE and EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES The demand for additional fire and emergency medical services is also based on the amount of new development. The amended project generates a similar demand for fire and medical emergency services as identified in the original PFFP. Therefore, the project must comply with the requirements identified in the original PFFP (2009 PFFP, Page 85), adjusted to actual unit counts and will be adequately served. IX.SCHOOLS The amended project includes a potential elementary school site, consistent with the adopted SPA Plan. The amended project generates the same number of elementary, middle and high school students as identified in the original PFFP due to the same maximum build-out unit count. (06/28/18)7 Millenia Supplemental PFFP The amended project must comply with the requirements identified in the original PFFP (2009 PFFP, Page 94). Consistent with these requirements, the master developer has entered into School Mitigation Agreements with both school districts and has formed Community Facilities District (CFD)18 for the Chula Vista Elementary School District and CFD18 for the Sweetwater Union High School District. Neither of these school agreements, the school CFDs or any mitigation obligations will change with the amendment so the amended project will continue to be adequately served by schools. X.LIBRARIES The amended project includes a potential library site, consistent with the adopted SPA Plan. The demand for additional library facilities is based on the amount of new residential development. Similar to schools, the amended project generates the same demand for library services. Therefore, the amended project must comply with the requirements identified in the original PFFP (2009 PFFP, Page 98), adjusted to actual unit counts and will be adequately served. The library obligation is further defined in the Millenia Development Agreement. In February of 2016, the applicant and one of the applicant's merchant builders entered into a recorded agreement with the City to transfer the library obligation from the applicant to the merchant builder. The project's responsibilities regarding libraries will not change with the SPA amendment so the amended project will continue to be adequately served by libraries. XI. PARKS, TRAILS and OPEN SPACE The amended project includes public and private park sites, consistent with the adopted SPA Plan. The demand for additional parks is based on the amount of new residential development. The amended project generates the same demand for parks. Trails and open space within the Otay Ranch community are designated at the General Development Plan (GDP) and implemented within each SPA. The amended SPA includes all the required GDP components included in the adopted SPA Plan. Therefore, the amended project must comply with the requirements identified in the original PFFP (2009 PFFP, Page 111), adjusted to actual unit counts and will be adequately served. Consistent with those requirements, the master developer entered into an agreement entitled “Agreement Regarding Construction of Parks in a Portion of the Otay Ranch Eastern Urban Center” as part of the original entitlements. That agreement has been amended twice, once in 2015 and again in 2016. No further amendment to that agreement, which is based on a build-out of 2,983 residential units (but contemplates the possibility of fewer units), will be required to implement the proposed SPA amendment. (06/28/18)8 Millenia Supplemental PFFP XII. WATER The demand for additional water and recycled water service is based on the amount of new development in a project. The amended project generates a similar demand for water and recycled water as identified in the original PFFP. Therefore, the project must comply with the requirements identified in the original PFFP (2009 PFFP, Page 121), adjusted to actual unit counts and will be adequately served. XIII. SEWER The demand for additional sewer service is based on the amount of new development in a project. The amended project generates a similar demand for sewer service as identified in the original PFFP. Therefore, the project must comply with the requirements identified in the original PFFP (2009 PFFP, Page 133-134), adjusted to actual unit counts and will be adequately served. XIV. DRAINAGE The need for additional drainage facilities is based on the amount of development (impervious surface) in a project. The developed area of the amended project is the same as that of the adopted SPA, hence the drainage needs of the amended project will be the same as the approved. Therefore, the amended project must comply with the requirements identified in the original PFFP (2009 PFFP, Pages 151-152). In addition, the amended project would continue to comply with all applicable rules and regulations including compliance with National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit requirements for urban runoff and stormwater discharge. Best Management Practices (BMPs) for design, treatment, and monitoring for stormwater quality would be implemented as required with respect to municipal and construction permits. XV. AIR QUALITY Air quality impacts associated with the adopted project were evaluated in the Air Quality Improvement Plan (AQIP) prepared and adopted with the original project approval. The primary factor in estimating ongoing emissions is the amount of vehicular traffic associated with the project and the amount of traffic is directly related to the amount of new development. The amended project would result in a similar level of development intensity. As a result, operational emissions (specifically those resulting from mobile sources) associated with the amended project would be similar to the prior analysis. Construction emissions would remain unchanged, because no change in the construction schedule or required construction equipment is anticipated. The (06/28/18)9 Millenia Supplemental PFFP previous analyses remain applicable to the proposed project, and no additional mitigation measures would be required. The amended project must comply with the requirements in the original PFFP (2009 PFFP Pages 156). XVI. CIVIC CENTER Per the original PFFP, there are no adopted Threshold Standards for the Civic Center. The Public Facilities fee (see Section V. Development Impact Fee Programs) must be paid prior to the issuance of building permits, at the rate in effect at the time payment is made. XVII. CORPORATION YARD Per the original PFFP, there are no adopted Threshold Standards for the Corporation Yard. The Public Facilities fee (see Section V. Development Impact Fee Programs) must be paid prior to the issuance of building permits, at the rate in effect at the time payment is made. XVIII. OTHER PUBLIC FACILITIES Per the original PFFP, there are no adopted Threshold Standards other facilities which are part of the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee Program. The Public Facilities fee (see Section V. Development Impact Fee Programs) must be paid prior to the issuance of building permits, at the rate in effect at the time payment is made. XIX. FISCAL ANALYSIS The Applicant will prepare an updated fiscal analysis for the amended project. XX.PUBLIC FACILITY FINANCE The amended project will utilize the same public facility finance mechanisms as the approved project. No changes are necessary to the original Public Facility Finance discussion. (06/28/18)10 Report for: Millenia Fiscal Impact Analysis Chula Vista, CA Prepared for: SLF IV - Millenia, LLC Prepared by: Pro Forma Advisors, LLC, re+ep June 2018 PFAID: 10-808 Version: 10.0 Pro Forma Advisors, LLC Los Angeles T 310.616.5079 New York Metro T 203.604.9007 F 888.696.9716 www.ProFormaAdvisors.com Table of Contents Introduction 1 Results 1 Project Description 4 Model Inputs 5 Appendix 9 Proposed Amendment FIA Tables 9 Pro Forma Advisors, LLC PFAID: 10-824.10 General Limiting Conditions Certain information included in this report contains forward-looking estimates, projections and/or statements. Pro Forma Advisors LLC has based these projections, estimates and/or statements on expected future events. These forward- looking items include statements that reflect our existing beliefs and knowledge regarding the operating environment, existing trends, existing plans, objectives, goals, expectations, anticipations, results of operations, future performance and business plans. Further, statements that include the words "may," "could," "should," "would," "believe," "expect," "anticipate," "estimate," "intend," "plan," “project,” or other words or expressions of similar meaning have been utilized. These statements reflect our judgment on the date they are made and we undertake no duty to update such statements in the future. No warranty or representation is made by Pro Forma Advisors that any of the projected values or results contained in this study will actually be achieved. Although we believe that the expectations in these reports are reasonable, any or all of the estimates or projections in this report may prove to be incorrect. To the extent possible, we have attempted to verify and confirm estimates and assumptions used in this analysis. However, some assumptions inevitably will not materialize as a result of inaccurate assumptions or as a consequence of known or unknown risks and uncertainties and unanticipated events and circumstances, which may occur. Consequently, actual results achieved during the period covered by our analysis will vary from our estimates and the variations may be material. As such, Pro Forma Advisors accepts no liability in relation to the estimates provided herein. In the production of this report, Pro Forma Advisors has served solely in the capacity of consultant and Pro Forma Advisors has not rendered any “expert” opinions and does not hold itself out as an “expert” (as the term “expert” is defined in Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933). This report is not to be used in conjunction with any public or private offering of securities, and may not be relied upon with the express written consent of Pro Forma Advisors. This study is qualified in its entirety by, and should be considered in light of, these limitations, conditions, and considerations. Pro Forma Advisors, LLC PFAID: 10-824.10 Introduction SLF IV - Millenia, LLC (“Owner” or “Client”) retained Pro Forma Advisors to evaluate the fiscal impacts of several build out scenarios for the approved project commonly referred to as “Millenia” and previously referred to as the Eastern Urban Center (“EUC”), which is part of the Otay Ranch Master Planned Community located in the City of Chula Vista (“City”). These build-out scenarios include the following: Proposed Amendment This scenario assumes the Millenia project continues to intensify over time and builds out to the maximum buildout under the proposed amendment which is 2,983 residential units and 3.1 million square feet of commercial uses. This scenario includes approximately 2.7 million square feet of office, 395,000 square feet of commercial, a 135-room hotel and approximately 130,000 square feet of civic uses. 2009 Adopted Plan This scenario assumes the Millenia project builds out to the maximum buildout under the current entitlements of 2,983 residential units and 3.48 million square feet of commercial uses. This scenario includes approximately 2.0 million sf of office, 980,000 square feet of commercial (including 160,000 square feet of civic and recreational uses), and two, 250- room hotels (500 rooms total). 2009 Adopted Plan with Reduced Hotel This scenario assumes the Millenia project builds out to the maximum buildout under the current entitlements but rather than two, 250-room hotels, the project includes a single 135-room hotel similar to the proposed project. The approved entitlements allow a maximum buildout at 2,983 residential units and 3.48 million square feet of commercial uses. The prior fiscal impact study prepared as part of the approved public facilities financing plan (“PFFP”) for Millenia evaluated the 2009 Adopted Plan scenario. Results The following analysis evaluates the fiscal impact of the various scenarios across a 30-year period, including build out that is projected to occur prior to Fiscal Year (FY) 30. For the purposes of this analysis, net fiscal impacts refer to the fiscal revenues less the fiscal costs generated by the development. A positive net fiscal impact means that the fiscal revenues covers the costs generated by the development. Using the City’s FIA Framework, the Proposed Amendment scenario would have a net positive revenue annual impact of approximately $740,000 in Year 10 (FY 2027) that is expected to grow to approximately $2.4 million in an illustrative Year 20 (FY 2037) and $5.4 million in an illustrative Year 30 (FY 2047). Pro Forma Advisors, LLC Page 1 PFAID: 10-824.10 Figure 1 - Net Fiscal Impact (Future Year Dollars) Year 10 (FY 2027) Year 20 (FY 2037) Year 30 (FY 2047) 30 Year Analysis30 Year AnalysisYear 10 (FY 2027) Year 20 (FY 2037) Year 30 (FY 2047) Cumulative Average Total General Fund Revenues $ 6,868,374 $ 9,677,123 $ 12,952,077 $ 235,912,249 $ 7,863,742 Total General Fund Expenditures $ 6,129,873 $ 7,273,249 $ 7,597,932 $ 177,466,660 $ 5,915,555 Projected Net Revenues/(Shortfall)$ 738,501 $ 2,403,874 $ 5,354,145 $ 58,445,589 $ 1,948,186 Source: Pro Forma Advisors and City of Chula Vista In 2009, Economic Research Associates conducted a FIA for the approved EUC Specific Plan Area (SPA) that estimated a range of positive net fiscal impacts of the project under a different development program. Using the City’s current FIA model, the net fiscal impact associated with the 2009 Adopted Plan scenario is presented below. A second analysis is also provided, for comparison purposes, with the 2009 Adopted Plan with Reduced Hotel. Figure 2 - Net Fiscal Impact Comparison (Future Year Dollars) $5,354,145 $7,709,985 $9,993,718 ($2,000,000) $0 $2,000,000 $4,000,000 $6,000,000 $8,000,000 $10,000,000 $12,000,000 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 FY 2033 FY 2034 FY 2035 FY 2036 FY 2037 FY 2038 FY 2039 FY 2040 FY 2041 FY 2042 FY 2043 FY 2044 FY 2045 FY 2046 FY 2047 Proposed Amendment 2009 Apodted Plan (135 Rooms) 2009 Apodted Plan (500 Rooms) Source: Economics Research Associates; Pro Forma Advisors; City of Chula Vista The purpose of including a scenario which assumes full buildout under the adopted plan but with a reduced number of hotel rooms was to illustrate the impact of the hotels and the Transient Occupancy Taxes (TOT) on the overall fiscal performance of the various alternatives. As noted by the Client, the single hotel currently planned is a direct consequence of City's decision to approve the construction of two new hotels, which total 300 rooms, in the Freeway Commercial SPA Plan amendment. If this direct competition, as well as the two new hotels being located in the Eastlake Business Park, were known at the time of Millenia's entitlement, then it is likely that no hotels, or perhaps a single smaller hotel would have been included and theoretically modeled in the fiscal study. Another way to look at this is that the net fiscal revenue associated with the hotel rooms were not lost, but rather transferred to another location in the City. Consequently, due to the weight given to TOT in the City's current fiscal model as well as differences between the overall development program, specifically the additional reduction of housing and retail development, comparisons between the Proposed Amendment and either of the proposed plan scenarios are not appropriate. While still a different Pro Forma Advisors, LLC Page 2 PFAID: 10-824.10 development programs and assumptions regarding absorption, a comparison between the Proposed Amendment and the 2009 Adopted Plan with Reduced Hotel is a more direct comparison. Figure 3 - Net Fiscal Impact of All Scenarios (Millions of Future Year Dollars) Year 5 Year 10 Year 15 Year 20 Year 25 Year 30 Proposed Amendment (135 room hotel)Proposed Amendment (135 room hotel)Proposed Amendment (135 room hotel)Proposed Amendment (135 room hotel)Proposed Amendment (135 room hotel)Proposed Amendment (135 room hotel)Proposed Amendment (135 room hotel) Total General Fund Revenues $4.1 $6.9 $7.8 $9.7 $11.1 $13.0 Total General Fund Expenditures $3.1 $6.1 $6.9 $7.3 $7.4 $7.6 Projected Net Revenues/(Shortfall)$1.0 $0.7 $0.8 $2.4 $3.7 $5.4 2009 Adopted Plan with Reduced Hotel (135 room hotel)2009 Adopted Plan with Reduced Hotel (135 room hotel)2009 Adopted Plan with Reduced Hotel (135 room hotel)2009 Adopted Plan with Reduced Hotel (135 room hotel)2009 Adopted Plan with Reduced Hotel (135 room hotel)2009 Adopted Plan with Reduced Hotel (135 room hotel)2009 Adopted Plan with Reduced Hotel (135 room hotel) Total General Fund Revenues $2.4 $6.0 $9.9 $12.0 $13.8 $15.4 Total General Fund Expenditures $2.1 $4.8 $7.2 $7.4 $7.6 $7.7 Projected Net Revenues/(Shortfall)$0.3 $1.1 $2.7 $4.6 $6.2 $7.7 2009 Adopted Plan Maximum Buildout (500 hotel rooms)2009 Adopted Plan Maximum Buildout (500 hotel rooms)2009 Adopted Plan Maximum Buildout (500 hotel rooms)2009 Adopted Plan Maximum Buildout (500 hotel rooms)2009 Adopted Plan Maximum Buildout (500 hotel rooms)2009 Adopted Plan Maximum Buildout (500 hotel rooms)2009 Adopted Plan Maximum Buildout (500 hotel rooms) Total General Fund Revenues $2.4 $7.6 $11.7 $14.0 $15.9 $17.7 Total General Fund Expenditures $2.0 $4.8 $7.2 $7.4 $7.6 $7.7 Projected Net Revenues/(Shortfall)$0.3 $2.8 $4.5 $6.5 $8.3 $10.0 Source: Pro Forma Advisors and City of Chula Vista Pro Forma Advisors, LLC Page 3 PFAID: 10-824.10 Project Description The Client is currently developing the Millenia project in the eastern portion of the City on vacant land located south of Birch Road, west of the SR-125, north of Hunte Parkway, and east of Eastlake Parkway (“Project Site”). The Project Site includes multiple parcels totaling approximately 145 net developable acres (Figure 4). Millenia will serve as a new urban center for the Otay Ranch and eastern Chula Vista community. The area is planned to include a variety of land uses including office, retail, hotel, and residential uses. Millenia will create an iconic urban village with a mixture of uses similar to a downtown environment and is anticipated be denser relative to the City as a whole. Figure 4 - Site Map Source: ESRi Business Analyst; Pro Forma Advisors Pro Forma Advisors, LLC Page 4 PFAID: 10-824.10 Figure 5 presents the land use program for the Proposed Amendment in comparison to the previously analyzed PFFP development program. The development program analyzed in the EUC SPA FIA1 includes approximately 2 million square feet of office, 160,000 square feet of civic uses, 815,000 square feet of retail, 165,000 square feet of residential fitness center, 500 hotel rooms (two 250-room properties), and 2,983 medium to high density for-sale residential units. The absorption schedule used in that FIA was expected to extend for over a 20 year build out during which the projects land uses would intensify overtime, with early phase surface parking lots being replaced by taller buildings and structured parking. Figure 5 - Estimated Building Square Feet Land Use Proposed Scenario Approved SPA Proposed vs. SPA Approved (Percent of Approved) Retail (SF)395,000 815,000 48% Office (SF)2,747,000 2,007,000 137% Civic (SF)130,852 160,000 82% Hotel (Rooms)135 500 27% Residential (Units)2,983 2,983 100% Note: 5,532 square feet of the retail space includes 4,200 SF of dedicated retail, 282 square feet of outdoor seating/plaza space, and 1050 square feet of live work space. For the purposes of this analysis, these mixed-use retail space has been classified as “retail” for the purpose of the FIA. Source: Economics Research Associates, Pro Forma Advisors Model Inputs Development Program Absorption The information provided has been provided by the Client and reflects the actual plans of their merchant builders, a qualified real estate market research firm hired by the Client, consultations with local developers, as well as their own development expertise to provide guidance on a reasonable build out timeline for the residential units given current market conditions. The following absorption schedules for commercial development were based on input provided by the Clients merchant builders and a review of the historical absorption of commercial development in the City across the last decade. Please see delivered model for specific assumptions regarding project absorption. Pro Forma Advisors, LLC Page 5 PFAID: 10-824.10 1 Memorandum “Eastern Urban Center Fiscal” dated March 31, 2009. Assessed Value The capitalized value approach was used to estimate the market value of commercial properties. Pro Forma used an average office lease rent of $2.60 (triple net or “NNN”) per month and a cap rate for a Class A office product (6.0 percent) as reported for San Diego in the CBRE’s Capitalization Rate Survey for the second-half of 2015.2 The cap rate is applied to the net operating income after reductions have been made for operating expenses and structural vacancy. As it relates to the NNN rent structure, it is assumed that the development recovers the vast amount of expenses. The capitalized value approach provided an assessed value of $400 per gross square foot of building area for the office space. A similar methodology was used to estimate the market value of the proposed retail development. Pro Forma used an average retail lease rent of $3.00 NNN per month and $1.50 NNN per month for the small-format (neighborhood) retail and large-format (community) retail, respectively. A 5.5 percent cap rate was used to estimate the value of both the community and neighborhood retail after accounting for operating expenses and structural vacancy. The capitalized value approach provided an assessed value of $532 and $266 per gross square foot of building area of the small-format and large-format retail, respectively. Currently, Chula Vista hotel accommodations have generally lower asking room rates than other submarkets in the larger San Diego market area. However, existing accommodations options include primarily economy level limited service hotels. The Client anticipates that the hotel developed at the Project Site will be of a higher quality and exceed the average daily room rate of many of the existing properties in the City. Based on information provided within the City model, PFA utilized a stabilized average daily rates of $154.87 with 77.1 percent occupancy. Using standard industry operating margins and a current cap rate of approximate 7.5 percent, each hotel room is projected to have a value of approximately $349,000 per room (key). The for-sale residential assessed value was determined based on the average, unadjusted, sales price. For-rent residential units’ assessed value was based on the assumed average asking rent along with the associated operating costs for multi-family residential development. The current multi-family for rent cap rate in San Diego (4.75 recent) was applied to estimate the total project value. In the FIA, for-sale residential were estimated to yield approximately $459,000 per unit while for-rent development was estimated to yield approximately $290,000 per unit.3 Pro Forma Advisors, LLC Page 6 PFAID: 10-824.10 2 Released May 2016 3 Assessed value assumptions on a per unit basis were utilized in the 2009 fiscal analysis. Figure 6 - Estimated Assessed Value by Land Use (2017 Dollars) Development (Units)Units Value per Unit per Year Building Efficiency Occ. Rate OpEx Cap Rate Est. Value (MM) Est. Value per Unit Retail Small-Format (SF)72,634 $36 90%95%5.0%5.50%$39 $532 Large-Format (SF)322,366 $18 90%95%5.0%5.50%$86 $266 Office (SF)2,747,000 $31 90%90%5.0%6.00%$1,099 $400 Hotel (Rooms)135 $56,575 40.0%7.50%$47 $349,000 Residential For-Sale (Dwelling Units)1,170 $459,300 $537 $459,300 For-Rent (Dwelling Units)1,813 $23,232 95%37.5%4.75%$526 $290,394 Total Assessed Value $2,334 Source: Pro Forma Advisors Maintenance Service Costs Public Works and Recreation Expenditures In 2014 the City Council adopted a resolution to establish a community facilities district (“CFD”) for Millenia, which authorizes a special tax to fund all or a portion of the costs to maintain and service a variety of facilities including: ‣Street Frontage Maintenance ‣Park Maintenance ‣Bio-Retention Maintenance ‣Storm Water Maintenance Maintenance includes, but is not limited to, the “furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, and servicing” within the CFD. The CFD tax also includes “Administrative Expenses” that represents the actual or estimated costs incurred by the City acting on behalf of the CFD area. As such, it is assumed that the CFD will cover the some of the costs associated with the new road network and urban parks. The following distributes the costs inputed into the “Maintenance Service Costs” tabs less the 20 percent “Admin/ Reserves” cost that is already included in the CFD for the park maintenance. Furthermore, the developer has formed a Master Community association in Millenia which will take over maintenance of a number of items normally covered by the City’s general fund including sidewalk maintenance, streetscape landscape maintenance and some lighting. As such, the estimates using the City’s fiscal model may overstate some of the costs associated with the project. Pro Forma Advisors, LLC Page 7 PFAID: 10-824.10 Figure 8 - Maintenance Service Inputs FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 Streets and Lighting Lane Miles (Cumulative) 3.4 7.1 7.1 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.2 Parks Park Acres (Cumulative) 1.970 1.970 3.480 8.980 10.600 10.600 10.600 10.600 10.600 10.600 10.600 10.600 10.600 Source: Client Pro Forma Advisors, LLC Page 8 PFAID: 10-824.10 Appendix Proposed Amendment FIA Tables (excel model available upon request) The remainder of the page is intentionally blank Appendix Pro Forma Advisors, LLC Page 9 PFAID: 10-808.08 Year 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Single Family Residential - 101 524 1,196 1,781 2,489 2,780 3,276 3,276 3,276 3,276 3,276 3,276 3,276 3,276 3,276 3,276 Multi-Family Residential 252 756 1,352 1,688 2,688 3,732 4,340 5,076 5,076 5,076 5,076 5,076 5,076 5,076 5,076 5,076 5,076 Subtotal (Per Capita)252 857 1,876 2,884 4,469 6,222 7,120 8,352 8,352 8,352 8,352 8,352 8,352 8,352 8,352 8,352 8,352 Employment Population 13 43 94 144 223 311 356 418 418 418 418 418 418 418 418 418 418 Totals 265 900 1,970 3,028 4,692 6,533 7,476 8,770 8,770 8,770 8,770 8,770 8,770 8,770 8,770 8,770 8,770 Single Family Residential - 36 187 427 636 889 993 1,170 1,170 1,170 1,170 1,170 1,170 1,170 1,170 1,170 1,170 Multi-Family Residential 90 270 483 603 960 1,333 1,550 1,813 1,813 1,813 1,813 1,813 1,813 1,813 1,813 1,813 1,813 Totals 90 306 670 1,030 1,596 2,222 2,543 2,983 2,983 2,983 2,983 2,983 2,983 2,983 2,983 2,983 2,983 Hotel 1 - # rooms - 135 135 135 135 135 135 135 135 135 135 135 135 135 135 135 135 Hotel 2 - # rooms - - - `- - - - - - - - - - - - - Totals - 135 135 135 135 135 135 135 135 135 135 135 135 135 135 135 135 Average Hotel Daily Rate - San Diego County Average*150.26$ 152.55$ 154.87$ 157.19$ 159.55$ 161.94$ 164.37$ 166.84$ 169.34$ 171.88$ 174.46$ 177.08$ 179.73$ 182.43$ 185.17$ 187.94$ 190.76$ Average Hotel Daily Rate - Developer Assigned*-$ 140.00$ 142.10$ 144.23$ 146.39$ 148.59$ 150.82$ 153.08$ 155.38$ 157.71$ 160.07$ 162.48$ 164.91$ 167.39$ 169.90$ 172.45$ 175.03$ Average Hotel Occupancy*77.1%77.1%77.1%77.1%77.1%77.1%77.1%77.1%77.1%77.1%77.1%77.1%77.1%77.1%77.1%77.1%77.1% Developer Provided Hotel Occupancy*0.0%50.0%70.0%70.0%70.0%70.0%70.0%70.0%70.0%70.0%70.0%70.0%70.0%70.0%70.0%70.0%70.0% Transient Occupancy Tax Rate (per room night)10%10%10%10%10%10%10%10%10%10%10%10%10%10%10%10%10% Absorption Rate 0%60%65%75%100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100% Year 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 General Fund Revenues Tax Revenues Property Tax AV 33,192$ 240,798$ 624,054$ 1,070,465$ 1,608,067$ 2,218,348$ 2,519,514$ 2,686,808$ 2,740,544$ 2,795,355$ 2,851,262$ 2,961,479$ 3,020,709$ 3,081,123$ 3,142,746$ 3,205,600$ 3,379,827$ Library (.7% of 1% of AV)AV - Project 1,829$ 13,272$ 34,397$ 59,002$ 88,634$ 122,271$ 138,871$ 148,092$ 151,054$ 154,075$ 157,156$ 163,231$ 166,496$ 169,826$ 173,222$ 176,687$ 186,290$ Sales and Use Tax Per Capita 30,431 104,740 233,192 364,623 574,334 813,030 946,066 1,128,279 1,147,031 1,163,428 1,198,331 1,234,281 1,271,309 1,309,449 1,348,732 1,389,194 1,430,870 Sales and Use Tax - Project Specific Project Specific - - 444,313 515,697 582,554 613,376 704,235 718,319 732,686 747,340 762,286 777,532 793,083 808,944 825,123 841,626 858,458 Transient Occupancy Tax Per Capita - 13,459 37,271 57,540 89,371 124,920 143,515 168,969 169,573 170,422 175,535 180,801 186,225 191,812 197,566 203,493 209,598 Transient Occupancy Tax - Project On-Site - 206,955 318,590 373,118 504,953 512,527 520,215 528,018 535,939 543,978 552,137 560,419 568,826 577,358 586,018 594,809 603,731 Motor Vehicle In-Lieu of VLF Per Capita 19,259 65,320 144,765 225,342 353,660 498,843 578,545 688,141 697,610 707,582 728,809 750,674 773,194 796,390 820,281 844,890 870,237 Franchise Fees Per Capita 11,059 35,716 78,129 120,102 186,088 259,063 296,472 348,022 348,268 348,771 359,234 370,011 381,111 392,545 404,321 416,451 428,944 Other Taxes Per Capita - - 7,800 12,358 18,647 25,506 28,682 33,050 32,180 31,596 32,544 33,520 34,526 35,562 36,629 37,728 38,859 Subtotal Tax Revenues 95,771 680,261 1,922,510 2,798,247 4,006,308 5,187,884 5,876,116 6,447,700 6,554,885 6,662,546 6,817,295 7,031,949 7,195,478 7,363,007 7,534,638 7,710,476 8,006,813 Other Revenues Per Capita 854 5,155 11,294 16,870 26,016 35,422 40,364 46,330 46,418 45,446 46,809 48,214 49,660 51,150 52,684 54,265 55,893 Licenses and Permits Per Capita 1,409 4,291 9,434 14,561 22,649 31,649 36,351 42,787 42,930 43,068 44,360 45,691 47,061 48,473 49,928 51,425 52,968 Fines, forfeitures, penalties Per Capita 994 3,396 7,441 11,448 17,752 24,942 28,561 33,794 33,807 34,084 35,107 36,160 37,245 38,362 39,513 40,699 41,920 Use of Money & Property Per Capita 2,237 7,563 16,410 25,004 38,564 53,447 60,663 70,858 70,298 70,018 72,119 74,282 76,511 78,806 81,170 83,606 86,114 Charges for Services No Forecast - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Intergovernmental Per Capita 1,803 6,328 13,752 20,988 32,290 44,644 50,750 59,139 58,760 58,657 60,417 62,229 64,096 66,019 67,999 70,039 72,141 Subtotal Other Revenues 6,442 21,578 47,037 72,001 111,255 154,683 176,325 206,579 205,795 205,828 212,002 218,363 224,913 231,661 238,611 245,769 253,142 Total General Fund Revenues 102,213$ 701,839$ 1,969,547$ 2,870,248$ 4,117,563$ 5,342,568$ 6,052,441$ 6,654,279$ 6,760,680$ 6,868,374$ 7,029,298$ 7,250,311$ 7,420,392$ 7,594,668$ 7,773,249$ 7,956,245$ 8,259,955$ General Fund Expenditures General Government Per Capita 2,847$ 9,024$ 20,663$ 32,846$ 53,915$ 78,090$ 92,384$ 112,401$ 115,093$ 114,508$ 116,174$ 117,888$ 119,653$ 121,474$ 123,344$ 126,359$ 129,474$ Community Development (20%)Per Capita 559 1,795 4,075 6,475 10,559 15,221 17,821 21,425 21,828 21,824 22,142 22,469 22,805 23,152 23,508 24,083 24,677 Public Works/Engineering Per Capita 2,111 6,831 18,864 29,968 48,711 72,400 84,765 101,909 103,824 103,808 105,319 106,872 108,472 110,123 111,819 114,551 117,376 Maintenance Costs Project Specific 105,456 193,311 219,672 334,161 365,953 373,272 380,738 388,353 396,120 404,042 412,123 420,365 428,773 437,348 446,095 455,017 464,117 PC/EMP Base Drainage Management System 26.50$ 6,795 23,103 23,565 24,037 24,517 25,008 25,508 26,018 26,538 27,069 27,610 28,163 28,726 29,300 29,886 30,484 31,094 Building Management System 4.10 1,050 3,570 3,642 3,715 3,789 3,865 3,942 4,021 4,101 4,183 4,267 4,352 4,439 4,528 4,619 4,711 4,805 Parks Management System 15.68 4,020 13,667 13,940 14,219 14,503 14,793 15,089 15,391 15,699 16,013 16,333 16,660 16,993 17,333 17,679 18,033 18,394 Open Space Management System 6.72 1,723 5,857 5,974 6,094 6,216 6,340 6,467 6,596 6,728 6,863 7,000 7,140 7,283 7,428 7,577 7,728 7,883 Fleet Management System 3.73 957 3,254 3,319 3,385 3,453 3,522 3,593 3,664 3,738 3,813 3,889 3,967 4,046 4,127 4,209 4,294 4,379 Pavement Annual (PMP)14.18 3,637 12,365 12,612 12,865 13,122 13,384 13,652 13,925 14,204 14,488 14,777 15,073 15,374 15,682 15,996 16,315 16,642 General Govt Management System 0.65 167 569 581 592 604 616 629 641 654 667 681 694 708 722 737 751 766 Urban Forestry Management System 6.72 1,723 5,857 5,974 6,094 6,216 6,340 6,467 6,596 6,728 6,863 7,000 7,140 7,283 7,428 7,577 7,728 7,883 78.28$ 20,071 68,243 69,608 71,000 72,420 73,868 75,346 76,853 78,390 79,958 81,557 83,188 84,852 86,549 88,280 90,045 91,846 Community Services Per Capita 4,072 13,294 29,892 47,474 76,837 109,591 128,308 154,258 157,157 157,133 159,420 161,771 164,193 166,692 169,259 173,395 177,670 Library Per Capita (Project)1,140 3,885 8,528 13,147 20,437 28,550 32,796 38,622 38,785 38,957 39,140 39,332 39,534 39,745 39,965 40,544 41,141 Public Safety: Police Services Project Specific 77,540 384,703 715,884 1,081,313 1,675,586 2,360,214 2,796,110 3,366,729 3,493,954 3,625,935 3,716,584 3,810,507 3,905,770 4,003,414 4,103,500 4,103,500 4,105,538 Fire Services Project Specific 30,280 145,841 304,804 481,219 735,944 1,027,229 1,193,138 1,417,179 1,445,417 1,474,326 1,518,556 1,564,388 1,611,320 1,659,659 1,709,449 1,709,449 1,710,015 Animal Control Services Per Capita 2,834 9,250 20,799 33,033 53,463 76,328 89,341 107,380 109,385 109,381 110,973 112,609 114,295 116,035 117,821 120,701 123,677 Total Public Safety 110,654 539,794 1,041,486 1,595,565 2,464,993 3,463,770 4,078,589 4,891,289 5,048,756 5,209,642 5,346,112 5,487,505 5,631,385 5,779,109 5,930,770 5,933,650 5,939,229 Total General Fund Expenditures 246,910$ 836,177$ 1,412,787$ 2,130,636$ 3,113,824$ 4,214,763$ 4,890,746$ 5,785,110$ 5,959,952$ 6,129,873$ 6,281,986$ 6,439,390$ 6,599,666$ 6,764,191$ 6,933,040$ 6,957,644$ 6,985,530$ Projected Net Revenues/(Shortfall)($144,697)($134,338)$556,760 $739,612 $1,003,739 $1,127,804 $1,161,695 $869,169 $800,727 $738,501 $747,312 $810,921 $820,725 $830,478 $840,209 $998,601 $1,274,425 Population Number of Homes Transient Occupancy Tax (Project Specific) Year Single Family Residential Multi-Family Residential Subtotal (Per Capita) Employment Population Totals Single Family Residential Multi-Family Residential Totals Hotel 1 - # rooms Hotel 2 - # rooms Totals Average Hotel Daily Rate - San Diego County Average* Average Hotel Daily Rate - Developer Assigned* Average Hotel Occupancy* Developer Provided Hotel Occupancy* Transient Occupancy Tax Rate (per room night) Absorption Rate Year General Fund Revenues Tax Revenues Property Tax AV Library (.7% of 1% of AV)AV - Project Sales and Use Tax Per Capita Sales and Use Tax - Project Specific Project Specific Transient Occupancy Tax Per Capita Transient Occupancy Tax - Project On-Site Motor Vehicle In-Lieu of VLF Per Capita Franchise Fees Per Capita Other Taxes Per Capita Subtotal Tax Revenues Other Revenues Per Capita Licenses and Permits Per Capita Fines, forfeitures, penalties Per Capita Use of Money & Property Per Capita Charges for Services No Forecast Intergovernmental Per Capita Subtotal Other Revenues Total General Fund Revenues General Fund Expenditures General Government Per Capita Community Development (20%)Per Capita Public Works/Engineering Per Capita Maintenance Costs Project Specific PC/EMP Base Drainage Management System 26.50$ Building Management System 4.10 Parks Management System 15.68 Open Space Management System 6.72 Fleet Management System 3.73 Pavement Annual (PMP)14.18 General Govt Management System 0.65 Urban Forestry Management System 6.72 78.28$ Community Services Per Capita Library Per Capita (Project) Public Safety: Police Services Project Specific Fire Services Project Specific Animal Control Services Per Capita Total Public Safety Total General Fund Expenditures Projected Net Revenues/(Shortfall) Population Number of Homes Transient Occupancy Tax (Project Specific) 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 3,276 3,276 3,276 3,276 3,276 3,276 3,276 3,276 3,276 3,276 3,276 3,276 3,276 5,076 5,076 5,076 5,076 5,076 5,076 5,076 5,076 5,076 5,076 5,076 5,076 5,076 8,352 8,352 8,352 8,352 8,352 8,352 8,352 8,352 8,352 8,352 8,352 8,352 8,352 418 418 418 418 418 418 418 418 418 418 418 418 418 8,770 8,770 8,770 8,770 8,770 8,770 8,770 8,770 8,770 8,770 8,770 8,770 8,770 1,170 1,170 1,170 1,170 1,170 1,170 1,170 1,170 1,170 1,170 1,170 1,170 1,170 1,813 1,813 1,813 1,813 1,813 1,813 1,813 1,813 1,813 1,813 1,813 1,813 1,813 2,983 2,983 2,983 2,983 2,983 2,983 2,983 2,983 2,983 2,983 2,983 2,983 2,983 135 135 135 135 135 135 135 135 135 135 135 135 135 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 135 135 135 135 135 135 135 135 135 135 135 135 135 193.62$ 196.53$ 199.48$ 202.47$ 205.50$ 208.59$ 211.72$ 214.89$ 218.12$ 221.39$ 224.71$ 228.08$ 231.50$ 177.66$ 180.32$ 183.03$ 185.77$ 188.56$ 191.39$ 194.26$ 197.17$ 200.13$ 203.13$ 206.18$ 209.27$ 212.41$ 77.1%77.1%77.1%77.1%77.1%77.1%77.1%77.1%77.1%77.1%77.1%77.1%77.1% 70.0%70.0%70.0%70.0%70.0%70.0%70.0%70.0%70.0%70.0%70.0%70.0%70.0% 10%10%10%10%10%10%10%10%10%10%10%10%10% 100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100% 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 3,447,424$ 3,516,372$ 3,687,643$ 3,761,396$ 4,039,250$ 4,120,035$ 4,202,435$ 4,286,484$ 4,587,156$ 4,907,088$ 5,005,230$ 5,105,335$ 5,207,442$ 190,015$ 193,816$ 203,256$ 207,321$ 222,636$ 227,089$ 231,630$ 236,263$ 252,835$ 270,469$ 275,879$ 281,396$ 287,024$ 1,473,796 1,518,010 1,563,550 1,610,456 1,658,770 1,708,533 1,759,789 1,812,583 1,866,960 1,922,969 1,980,658 2,040,078 2,101,280 875,627 893,140 1,623,605 1,656,077 1,689,199 1,722,983 1,757,442 1,792,591 1,828,443 1,865,012 1,902,312 1,940,358 1,979,166 215,886 222,362 229,033 235,904 242,981 250,271 257,779 265,512 273,477 281,682 290,132 298,836 307,801 612,787 621,979 631,308 640,778 650,390 660,145 670,048 680,098 690,300 700,654 711,164 721,832 732,659 896,344 923,234 950,931 979,459 1,008,843 1,039,108 1,070,281 1,102,390 1,135,461 1,169,525 1,204,611 1,240,749 1,277,972 441,812 455,067 468,719 482,780 497,264 512,182 527,547 543,374 559,675 576,465 593,759 611,572 629,919 40,025 41,226 42,463 43,737 45,049 46,400 47,792 49,226 50,703 52,224 53,791 55,404 57,066 8,193,716 8,385,205 9,400,508 9,617,909 10,054,380 10,286,745 10,524,744 10,768,521 11,245,011 11,746,089 12,017,536 12,295,561 12,580,329 57,569 59,297 61,075 62,908 64,795 66,739 68,741 70,803 72,927 75,115 77,369 79,690 82,080 54,557 56,194 57,880 59,616 61,405 63,247 65,144 67,098 69,111 71,185 73,320 75,520 77,785 43,177 44,472 45,807 47,181 48,596 50,054 51,556 53,102 54,695 56,336 58,026 59,767 61,560 88,697 91,358 94,099 96,922 99,829 102,824 105,909 109,086 112,359 115,730 119,202 122,778 126,461 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 74,305 76,534 78,830 81,195 83,631 86,140 88,724 91,386 94,127 96,951 99,859 102,855 105,941 260,736 268,558 276,615 284,914 293,461 302,265 311,333 320,673 330,293 340,202 350,408 360,920 371,748 8,454,452$ 8,653,763$ 9,677,123$ 9,902,822$ 10,347,841$ 10,589,010$ 10,836,077$ 11,089,194$ 11,575,304$ 12,086,291$ 12,367,944$ 12,656,481$ 12,952,077$ 132,662$ 135,936$ 139,316$ 142,798$ 146,388$ 150,061$ 153,845$ 157,740$ 161,748$ 165,878$ 170,130$ 174,480$ 178,949$ 25,284 25,908 26,553 27,216 27,900 28,600 29,322 30,064 30,828 31,615 32,426 33,255 34,106 120,266 123,234 126,298 129,455 132,709 136,039 139,470 143,000 146,634 150,378 154,233 158,177 162,228 473,400 482,868 492,525 502,375 512,423 522,671 533,125 543,787 554,663 565,756 577,071 588,613 600,385 31,716 32,350 32,997 33,657 34,330 35,017 35,717 36,431 37,160 37,903 38,661 39,435 40,223 4,901 4,999 5,099 5,201 5,305 5,411 5,520 5,630 5,743 5,858 5,975 6,094 6,216 18,761 19,137 19,519 19,910 20,308 20,714 21,128 21,551 21,982 22,422 22,870 23,327 23,794 8,041 8,201 8,365 8,533 8,703 8,877 9,055 9,236 9,421 9,609 9,801 9,997 10,197 4,467 4,556 4,647 4,740 4,835 4,932 5,031 5,131 5,234 5,338 5,445 5,554 5,665 16,975 17,314 17,660 18,014 18,374 18,741 19,116 19,498 19,888 20,286 20,692 21,106 21,528 782 797 813 830 846 863 880 898 916 934 953 972 991 8,041 8,201 8,365 8,533 8,703 8,877 9,055 9,236 9,421 9,609 9,801 9,997 10,197 93,683 95,557 97,468 99,417 101,406 103,434 105,502 107,612 109,765 111,960 114,199 116,483 118,813 182,046 186,538 191,176 195,954 200,880 205,920 211,113 216,458 221,959 227,625 233,460 239,430 245,563 41,744 42,360 42,991 43,638 44,300 44,972 45,658 46,359 47,075 47,809 48,559 49,316 50,088 4,105,538 4,105,538 4,265,747 4,265,747 4,269,144 4,269,144 4,269,144 4,269,144 4,272,472 4,275,937 4,275,937 4,275,937 4,275,937 1,710,015 1,710,015 1,758,098 1,758,098 1,759,040 1,759,040 1,759,040 1,759,040 1,759,964 1,760,925 1,760,925 1,760,925 1,760,925 126,722 129,850 133,078 136,404 139,833 143,342 146,957 150,677 154,506 158,451 162,513 166,668 170,937 5,942,275 5,945,402 6,156,923 6,160,249 6,168,017 6,171,526 6,175,141 6,178,861 6,186,942 6,195,313 6,199,375 6,203,530 6,207,799 7,011,360$ 7,037,803$ 7,273,249$ 7,301,102$ 7,334,022$ 7,363,223$ 7,393,176$ 7,423,881$ 7,459,615$ 7,496,335$ 7,529,452$ 7,563,284$ 7,597,932$ $1,443,092 $1,615,960 $2,403,874 $2,601,720 $3,013,819 $3,225,787 $3,442,901 $3,665,312 $4,115,689 $4,589,956 $4,838,492 $5,093,197 $5,354,145 Year 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Property Tax Analysis Residential Units Multi-Family Residential - Attached Townhomes Total Cumulative SFR Units 1,170 - 36 187 427 636 889 993 1,170 1,170 1,170 1,170 Total Cumulative Residents 2.80 - 101 524 1,196 1,781 2,489 2,780 3,276 3,276 3,276 3,276 Percentage Complete 0%4%19%43%64%89%99%100%100%100%100% Constructed Assessed Values $537,381,000 $0 $19,345,716 $100,490,247 $229,461,687 $341,774,316 $477,731,709 $533,619,333 $537,381,000 $537,381,000 $537,381,000 $537,381,000 Multi-Family Attached Apartments Total Cumulative MFR Units 1,813 90 270 483 603 960 1,333 1,550 1,813 1,813 1,813 1,813 Total Cumulative Residents 2.80 252 756 1,352 1,688 2,688 3,732 4,340 5,076 5,076 5,076 5,076 Percentage Complete 5%15%27%33%53%74%85%100%100%100%100% Constructed Assessed Values $526,484,322 $26,135,460 $78,406,380 $140,260,302 $175,107,582 $278,778,240 $387,095,202 $450,110,700 $526,484,322 $526,484,322 $526,484,322 $526,484,322 Total Cumulative Residents 252 857 1,876 2,884 4,469 6,222 7,120 8,352 8,352 8,352 8,352 Commercial Percentage Complete 0%33%38%44%48%50%56%56%56%56%56% Constructed Assessed Values 124,309,871$ -$ 41,065,058$ 47,633,969$ 54,202,880$ 60,029,394$ 61,966,110$ 69,750,111$ 69,750,111$ 69,750,111$ 69,750,111$ 69,750,111$ Industrial Percentage Complete 0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0% Constructed Assessed Values -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Office Percentage Complete 0%0%13%27%41%57%62%62%62%62%62% Constructed Assessed Values 1,073,711,052$ -$ -$ 136,845,526$ 288,428,263$ 442,116,316$ 608,204,678$ 661,069,158$ 661,069,158$ 661,069,158$ 661,069,158$ 661,069,158$ Hotel Percentage Complete 0%100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100% Constructed Assessed Values 47,070,000$ -$ 47,070,000$ 47,070,000$ 47,070,000$ 47,070,000$ 47,070,000$ 47,070,000$ 47,070,000$ 47,070,000$ 47,070,000$ 47,070,000$ Constructed Assessed Values Total Current Period Assessed Value Additions 26,135,460$ 185,887,154$ 472,300,044$ 794,270,412$ 1,169,768,266$ 1,582,067,699$ 1,761,619,302$ 1,841,754,591$ 1,841,754,591$ 1,841,754,591$ 1,841,754,591$ Inflation Factor 2.00%100.00%102.00%104.04%106.12%108.24%110.41%112.62%114.87%117.17%119.51%121.90% Total AV - Inflated $26,135,460 $189,604,897 $491,380,966 $842,886,116 $1,266,194,790 $1,746,730,576 $1,983,869,455 $2,115,597,102 $2,157,909,044 $2,201,067,225 $2,245,088,569 Cumulative AV (w/o Prior Years Inflation)$26,135,460 $189,604,897 $491,380,966 $842,886,116 $1,266,194,790 $1,746,730,576 $1,983,869,455 $2,115,597,102 $2,157,909,044 $2,201,067,225 $2,245,088,569 Prior Years AV Inflation Factor 2.00%0.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00% Prior Years AV Inflation Amount $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Cumulative Residential AV - Inflated $26,135,460 $189,604,897 $491,380,966 $842,886,116 $1,266,194,790 $1,746,730,576 $1,983,869,455 $2,115,597,102 $2,157,909,044 $2,201,067,225 $2,245,088,569 Property Tax Revenue Estimate Ad-Valorem 1.00%261,355$ 1,896,049$ 4,913,810$ 8,428,861$ 12,661,948$ 17,467,306$ 19,838,695$ 21,155,971$ 21,579,090$ 22,010,672$ 22,450,886$ Total AV Tax Due to City 12.70%$33,192 $240,798 $624,054 $1,070,465 $1,608,067 $2,218,348 $2,519,514 $2,686,808 $2,740,544 $2,795,355 $2,851,262 Year Property Tax Analysis Residential Units Multi-Family Residential - Attached Townhomes Total Cumulative SFR Units Total Cumulative Residents Percentage Complete Constructed Assessed Values Multi-Family Attached Apartments Total Cumulative MFR Units Total Cumulative Residents Percentage Complete Constructed Assessed Values Total Cumulative Residents Commercial Percentage Complete Constructed Assessed Values Industrial Percentage Complete Constructed Assessed Values Office Percentage Complete Constructed Assessed Values Hotel Percentage Complete Constructed Assessed Values Constructed Assessed Values Total Current Period Assessed Value Additions Inflation Factor Total AV - Inflated Cumulative AV (w/o Prior Years Inflation) Prior Years AV Inflation Factor Prior Years AV Inflation Amount Cumulative Residential AV - Inflated Property Tax Revenue Estimate Ad-Valorem Total AV Tax Due to City 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 1,170 1,170 1,170 1,170 1,170 1,170 1,170 1,170 1,170 1,170 1,170 1,170 3,276 3,276 3,276 3,276 3,276 3,276 3,276 3,276 3,276 3,276 3,276 3,276 100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100% $537,381,000 $537,381,000 $537,381,000 $537,381,000 $537,381,000 $537,381,000 $537,381,000 $537,381,000 $537,381,000 $537,381,000 $537,381,000 $537,381,000 1,813 1,813 1,813 1,813 1,813 1,813 1,813 1,813 1,813 1,813 1,813 1,813 5,076 5,076 5,076 5,076 5,076 5,076 5,076 5,076 5,076 5,076 5,076 5,076 100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100% $526,484,322 $526,484,322 $526,484,322 $526,484,322 $526,484,322 $526,484,322 $526,484,322 $526,484,322 $526,484,322 $526,484,322 $526,484,322 $526,484,322 8,352 8,352 8,352 8,352 8,352 8,352 8,352 8,352 8,352 8,352 8,352 8,352 56%56%56%56%56%56%56%56%100%100%100%100% 69,750,111$ 69,750,111$ 69,750,111$ 69,750,111$ 69,750,111$ 69,750,111$ 69,750,111$ 69,750,111$ 124,309,871$ 124,309,871$ 124,309,871$ 124,309,871$ 0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0% -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 65%65%65%65%65%71%71%71%71%71%80%80% 694,754,210$ 694,754,210$ 694,754,210$ 694,754,210$ 694,754,210$ 757,913,684$ 757,913,684$ 757,913,684$ 757,913,684$ 757,913,684$ 863,179,473$ 863,179,473$ 100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100% 47,070,000$ 47,070,000$ 47,070,000$ 47,070,000$ 47,070,000$ 47,070,000$ 47,070,000$ 47,070,000$ 47,070,000$ 47,070,000$ 47,070,000$ 47,070,000$ 1,875,439,643$ 1,875,439,643$ 1,875,439,643$ 1,875,439,643$ 1,875,439,643$ 1,938,599,117$ 1,938,599,117$ 1,938,599,117$ 1,993,158,877$ 1,993,158,877$ 2,098,424,666$ 2,098,424,666$ 124.34%126.82%129.36%131.95%134.59%137.28%140.02%142.82%145.68%148.59%151.57%154.60% $2,331,873,469 $2,378,510,939 $2,426,081,158 $2,474,602,781 $2,524,094,836 $2,661,281,156 $2,714,506,779 $2,768,796,914 $2,903,656,120 $2,961,729,243 $3,180,511,642 $3,244,121,874 $2,331,873,469 $2,378,510,939 $2,426,081,158 $2,474,602,781 $2,524,094,836 $2,661,281,156 $2,714,506,779 $2,768,796,914 $2,903,656,120 $2,961,729,243 $3,180,511,642 $3,244,121,874 2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,331,873,469 $2,378,510,939 $2,426,081,158 $2,474,602,781 $2,524,094,836 $2,661,281,156 $2,714,506,779 $2,768,796,914 $2,903,656,120 $2,961,729,243 $3,180,511,642 $3,244,121,874 23,318,735$ 23,785,109$ 24,260,812$ 24,746,028$ 25,240,948$ 26,612,812$ 27,145,068$ 27,687,969$ 29,036,561$ 29,617,292$ 31,805,116$ 32,441,219$ $2,961,479 $3,020,709 $3,081,123 $3,142,746 $3,205,600 $3,379,827 $3,447,424 $3,516,372 $3,687,643 $3,761,396 $4,039,250 $4,120,035 Year Property Tax Analysis Residential Units Multi-Family Residential - Attached Townhomes Total Cumulative SFR Units Total Cumulative Residents Percentage Complete Constructed Assessed Values Multi-Family Attached Apartments Total Cumulative MFR Units Total Cumulative Residents Percentage Complete Constructed Assessed Values Total Cumulative Residents Commercial Percentage Complete Constructed Assessed Values Industrial Percentage Complete Constructed Assessed Values Office Percentage Complete Constructed Assessed Values Hotel Percentage Complete Constructed Assessed Values Constructed Assessed Values Total Current Period Assessed Value Additions Inflation Factor Total AV - Inflated Cumulative AV (w/o Prior Years Inflation) Prior Years AV Inflation Factor Prior Years AV Inflation Amount Cumulative Residential AV - Inflated Property Tax Revenue Estimate Ad-Valorem Total AV Tax Due to City 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 1,170 1,170 1,170 1,170 1,170 1,170 1,170 3,276 3,276 3,276 3,276 3,276 3,276 3,276 100%100%100%100%100%100%100% $537,381,000 $537,381,000 $537,381,000 $537,381,000 $537,381,000 $537,381,000 $537,381,000 1,813 1,813 1,813 1,813 1,813 1,813 1,813 5,076 5,076 5,076 5,076 5,076 5,076 5,076 100%100%100%100%100%100%100% $526,484,322 $526,484,322 $526,484,322 $526,484,322 $526,484,322 $526,484,322 $526,484,322 8,352 8,352 8,352 8,352 8,352 8,352 8,352 100%100%100%100%100%100%100% 124,309,871$ 124,309,871$ 124,309,871$ 124,309,871$ 124,309,871$ 124,309,871$ 124,309,871$ 0%0%0%0%0%0%0% -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 80%80%90%100%100%100%100% 863,179,473$ 863,179,473$ 966,339,947$ 1,073,711,052$ 1,073,711,052$ 1,073,711,052$ 1,073,711,052$ 100%100%100%100%100%100%100% 47,070,000$ 47,070,000$ 47,070,000$ 47,070,000$ 47,070,000$ 47,070,000$ 47,070,000$ 2,098,424,666$ 2,098,424,666$ 2,201,585,140$ 2,308,956,245$ 2,308,956,245$ 2,308,956,245$ 2,308,956,245$ 157.69%160.84%164.06%167.34%170.69%174.10%177.58% $3,309,004,312 $3,375,184,398 $3,611,933,778 $3,863,849,205 $3,941,126,190 $4,019,948,713 $4,100,347,688 $3,309,004,312 $3,375,184,398 $3,611,933,778 $3,863,849,205 $3,941,126,190 $4,019,948,713 $4,100,347,688 2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,309,004,312 $3,375,184,398 $3,611,933,778 $3,863,849,205 $3,941,126,190 $4,019,948,713 $4,100,347,688 33,090,043$ 33,751,844$ 36,119,338$ 38,638,492$ 39,411,262$ 40,199,487$ 41,003,477$ $4,202,435 $4,286,484 $4,587,156 $4,907,088 $5,005,230 $5,105,335 $5,207,442 Year 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Sales Tax Analysis - Project Specific Total (Square Feet) Small Format - - 20,873 41,746 41,746 47,900 72,634 72,634 72,634 72,634 72,634 72,634 72,634 72,634 72,634 72,634 72,634 72,634 Large Format - 130,486 130,486 130,486 149,000 149,000 149,000 149,000 149,000 149,000 149,000 149,000 149,000 149,000 149,000 149,000 149,000 149,000 Totals - 130,486 151,359 172,232 190,746 196,900 221,634 221,634 221,634 221,634 221,634 221,634 221,634 221,634 221,634 221,634 221,634 221,634 Gross Leasable Area (Square Feet)Absorption Small Format 90%- - 18,786 37,571 37,571 43,110 65,371 65,371 65,371 65,371 65,371 65,371 65,371 65,371 65,371 65,371 65,371 65,371 Large Format 90%- 117,437 117,437 117,437 134,100 134,100 134,100 134,100 134,100 134,100 134,100 134,100 134,100 134,100 134,100 134,100 134,100 134,100 Occupied Gross Leasable Area (Square Feet)Occupancy Rate Small Format 95%- - 17,846 35,693 35,693 40,955 62,102 62,102 62,102 62,102 62,102 62,102 62,102 62,102 62,102 62,102 62,102 62,102 Large Format 95%- - 111,566 111,566 127,395 127,395 127,395 127,395 127,395 127,395 127,395 127,395 127,395 127,395 127,395 127,395 127,395 127,395 Taxable Sales Projected (Estimate)Sales PSF 330$ 337$ 343$ 350$ 357$ 364$ 372$ 379$ 387$ 394$ 402$ 410$ 419$ 427$ 435$ 444$ 453$ 462$ Small Format 350.00$ -$ -$ 6,127,245$ 12,499,581$ 12,749,572$ 14,921,635$ 23,079,216$ 23,540,800$ 24,011,616$ 24,491,848$ 24,981,685$ 25,481,319$ 25,990,945$ 26,510,764$ 27,040,980$ 27,581,799$ 28,133,435$ 28,696,104$ Large Format 325.00$ - - 38,304,017 39,070,097 45,505,827 46,415,943 47,344,262 48,291,148 49,256,970 50,242,110 51,246,952 52,271,891 53,317,329 54,383,676 55,471,349 56,580,776 57,712,392 58,866,639 Total Taxable Retail Sales Estimated -$ -$ 44,431,262$ 51,569,677$ 58,255,399$ 61,337,579$ 70,423,478$ 71,831,948$ 73,268,587$ 74,733,958$ 76,228,637$ 77,753,210$ 79,308,274$ 80,894,440$ 82,512,329$ 84,162,575$ 85,845,827$ 87,562,743$ Annual Sales Taxes to the City Small Format 1.00%-$ -$ 61,272$ 124,996$ 127,496$ 149,216$ 230,792$ 235,408$ 240,116$ 244,918$ 249,817$ 254,813$ 259,909$ 265,108$ 270,410$ 275,818$ 281,334$ 286,961$ Large Format 1.00%- - 383,040 390,701 455,058 464,159 473,443 482,911 492,570 502,421 512,470 522,719 533,173 543,837 554,713 565,808 577,124 588,666 Growth Percentage - Estimated -$ -$ 444,313$ 515,697$ 582,554$ 613,376$ 704,235$ 718,319$ 732,686$ 747,340$ 762,286$ 777,532$ 793,083$ 808,944$ 825,123$ 841,626$ 858,458$ 875,627$ Total Annual Sales Taxes to the City Year Sales Tax Analysis - Project Specific Total (Square Feet) Small Format Large Format Totals Gross Leasable Area (Square Feet)Absorption Small Format 90% Large Format 90% Occupied Gross Leasable Area (Square Feet)Occupancy Rate Small Format 95% Large Format 95% Taxable Sales Projected (Estimate)Sales PSF Small Format 350.00$ Large Format 325.00$ Total Taxable Retail Sales Estimated Annual Sales Taxes to the City Small Format 1.00% Large Format 1.00% Growth Percentage - Estimated Total Annual Sales Taxes to the City 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 72,634 72,634 72,634 72,634 72,634 72,634 72,634 72,634 72,634 72,634 72,634 72,634 149,000 322,366 322,366 322,366 322,366 322,366 322,366 322,366 322,366 322,366 322,366 322,366 221,634 395,000 395,000 395,000 395,000 395,000 395,000 395,000 395,000 395,000 395,000 395,000 65,371 65,371 65,371 65,371 65,371 65,371 65,371 65,371 65,371 65,371 65,371 65,371 134,100 290,129 290,129 290,129 290,129 290,129 290,129 290,129 290,129 290,129 290,129 290,129 62,102 62,102 62,102 62,102 62,102 62,102 62,102 62,102 62,102 62,102 62,102 62,102 127,395 275,623 275,623 275,623 275,623 275,623 275,623 275,623 275,623 275,623 275,623 275,623 471$ 481$ 490$ 500$ 510$ 520$ 531$ 541$ 552$ 563$ 575$ 586$ 29,270,026$ 29,855,427$ 30,452,535$ 31,061,586$ 31,682,817$ 32,316,474$ 32,962,803$ 33,622,059$ 34,294,501$ 34,980,391$ 35,679,998$ 36,393,598$ 60,043,972 132,505,086 135,155,188 137,858,292 140,615,457 143,427,767 146,296,322 149,222,248 152,206,693 155,250,827 158,355,844 161,522,961 89,313,998$ 162,360,513$ 165,607,723$ 168,919,877$ 172,298,275$ 175,744,240$ 179,259,125$ 182,844,308$ 186,501,194$ 190,231,218$ 194,035,842$ 197,916,559$ 292,700$ 298,554$ 304,525$ 310,616$ 316,828$ 323,165$ 329,628$ 336,221$ 342,945$ 349,804$ 356,800$ 363,936$ 600,440 1,325,051 1,351,552 1,378,583 1,406,155 1,434,278 1,462,963 1,492,222 1,522,067 1,552,508 1,583,558 1,615,230 893,140$ 1,623,605$ 1,656,077$ 1,689,199$ 1,722,983$ 1,757,442$ 1,792,591$ 1,828,443$ 1,865,012$ 1,902,312$ 1,940,358$ 1,979,166$ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 POPULATION 272,736 277,555 282,375 287,195 292,015 296,835 301,655 306,475 311,295 316,115 320,935 325,755 330,575 335,395 340,215 342,066 343,844 345,651 347,440 CHANGE IN POPULATION 4,819 4,820 4,820 4,820 4,820 4,820 4,820 4,820 4,820 4,820 4,820 4,820 4,820 4,820 1,851 1,778 1,807 1,789 2.8 # of DU 1,721 1,721 1,721 1,721 1,721 1,721 1,721 1,721 1,721 1,721 1,721 1,721 1,721 1,721 661 635 645 639 FUTURE SFR 4,854 SFR 306 306 306 306 306 306 306 306 306 306 306 306 306 306 117 113 115 114 FUTURE MFR 22,467 MFR 1,415 1,415 1,415 1,415 1,415 1,415 1,415 1,415 1,415 1,415 1,415 1,415 1,415 1,415 544 522 530 525 27,321 DEVELOPER SFR (UNITS)- 36 187 427 636 889 993 1,170 1,170 1,170 1,170 1,170 1,170 1,170 1,170 1,170 1,170 1,170 1,170 DEVELOPER MFR (UNITS)90 270 483 603 960 1,333 1,550 1,813 1,813 1,813 1,813 1,813 1,813 1,813 1,813 1,813 1,813 1,813 1,813 62.90 COMMERCIAL (ACRES)- 20.78 24.10 27.43 30.37 31.35 35.29 35.29 35.29 35.29 35.29 35.29 35.29 35.29 35.29 35.29 35.29 35.29 35.29 27.69 OFFICE (ACRES)- - 3.53 7.44 11.40 15.69 17.05 17.05 17.05 17.05 17.05 17.92 17.92 17.92 17.92 17.92 19.55 19.55 19.55 5.66 HOTEL (ACRES)- 5.66 5.66 5.66 5.66 5.66 5.66 5.66 5.66 5.66 5.66 5.66 5.66 5.66 5.66 5.66 5.66 5.66 5.66 EXISTING DU POLICE Single Family Units 36,084 PER DU 798.08$ 798.08$ 850.52$ 839.71$ 870.79$ 903.71$ 937.05$ 971.88$ 1,008.63$ 1,046.74$ 1,086.28$ 1,113.44$ 1,141.28$ 1,169.81$ 1,199.05$ 1,229.03$ 1,229.03$ 1,229.03$ 1,229.03$ 1,229.03$ POLICE Multi-Family Units 27,814 PER DU 861.56$ 861.56$ 918.17$ 906.49$ 940.05$ 975.59$ 1,011.58$ 1,049.18$ 1,088.85$ 1,130.00$ 1,172.68$ 1,202.00$ 1,232.05$ 1,262.85$ 1,294.42$ 1,326.78$ 1,326.78$ 1,326.78$ 1,326.78$ 1,326.78$ EXISTING ACRES POLICE Commercial Acres 936 PER ACRE 3,768.38$ 3,768.38$ 4,016.02$ 3,964.93$ 4,111.71$ 4,267.17$ 4,424.58$ 4,589.04$ 4,762.56$ 4,942.53$ 5,129.23$ 5,257.46$ 5,388.89$ 5,523.62$ 5,661.71$ 5,803.25$ 5,803.25$ 5,803.25$ 5,803.25$ 5,803.25$ POLICE Industrial Acres 834 PER ACRE 812.45$ 812.45$ 865.84$ 854.83$ 886.47$ 919.99$ 953.93$ 989.38$ 1,026.79$ 1,065.59$ 1,105.85$ 1,133.49$ 1,161.83$ 1,190.87$ 1,220.65$ 1,251.16$ 1,251.16$ 1,251.16$ 1,251.16$ 1,251.16$ POLICE COSTS - PROJECT SPECIFIC 77,540$ 384,703$ 715,884$ 1,081,313$ 1,675,586$ 2,360,214$ 2,796,110$ 3,366,729$ 3,493,954$ 3,625,935$ 3,716,584$ 3,810,507$ 3,905,770$ 4,003,414$ 4,103,500$ 4,103,500$ 4,105,538$ 4,105,538$ 4,105,538$ EXISTING DU FIRE Single Family Units 36,084 PER DU 467.29$ 467.29$ 485.74$ 495.42$ 505.23$ 515.22$ 525.49$ 535.96$ 546.64$ 557.53$ 568.68$ 585.74$ 603.32$ 621.42$ 640.06$ 659.26$ 659.26$ 659.26$ 659.26$ 659.26$ FIRE Multi-Family Units 27,814 PER DU 336.44$ 336.44$ 349.73$ 356.70$ 363.76$ 370.96$ 378.35$ 385.89$ 393.58$ 401.42$ 409.45$ 421.73$ 434.38$ 447.42$ 460.84$ 474.66$ 474.66$ 474.66$ 474.66$ 474.66$ EXISTING ACRES FIRE Commercial Acres 936 PER ACRE 1,234.54$ 1,234.54$ 1,283.28$ 1,308.86$ 1,334.77$ 1,361.18$ 1,388.30$ 1,415.97$ 1,444.18$ 1,472.96$ 1,502.42$ 1,547.49$ 1,593.92$ 1,641.73$ 1,690.99$ 1,741.72$ 1,741.72$ 1,741.72$ 1,741.72$ 1,741.72$ FIRE Industrial Acres 834 PER ACRE 246.05$ 246.05$ 255.76$ 260.86$ 266.03$ 271.29$ 276.70$ 282.21$ 287.83$ 293.57$ 299.44$ 308.42$ 317.68$ 327.21$ 337.02$ 347.13$ 347.13$ 347.13$ 347.13$ 347.13$ FIRE COSTS - PROJECT SPECIFIC 30,280$ 145,841$ 304,804$ 481,219$ 735,944$ 1,027,229$ 1,193,138$ 1,417,179$ 1,445,417$ 1,474,326$ 1,518,556$ 1,564,388$ 1,611,320$ 1,659,659$ 1,709,449$ 1,709,449$ 1,710,015$ 1,710,015$ 1,710,015$ POPULATION PER DU FACTOR POPULATION CHANGE IN POPULATION 2.8 # of DU FUTURE SFR 4,854 SFR FUTURE MFR 22,467 MFR 27,321 DEVELOPER SFR (UNITS) DEVELOPER MFR (UNITS) 62.90 COMMERCIAL (ACRES) 27.69 OFFICE (ACRES) 5.66 HOTEL (ACRES) EXISTING DU POLICE Single Family Units 36,084 PER DU 798.08$ POLICE Multi-Family Units 27,814 PER DU 861.56$ EXISTING ACRES POLICE Commercial Acres 936 PER ACRE 3,768.38$ POLICE Industrial Acres 834 PER ACRE 812.45$ POLICE COSTS - PROJECT SPECIFIC EXISTING DU FIRE Single Family Units 36,084 PER DU 467.29$ FIRE Multi-Family Units 27,814 PER DU 336.44$ EXISTING ACRES FIRE Commercial Acres 936 PER ACRE 1,234.54$ FIRE Industrial Acres 834 PER ACRE 246.05$ FIRE COSTS - PROJECT SPECIFIC POPULATION PER DU FACTOR 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 349,185 350,894 352,560 354,241 355,895 357,524 359,126 360,683 362,220 363,786 365,344 1,746 1,708 1,667 1,681 1,654 1,629 1,601 1,557 1,537 1,567 1,558 623 610 595 600 591 582 572 556 549 559 556 111 108 106 107 105 103 102 99 98 99 99 512 502 489 493 486 479 470 457 451 460 457 1,170 1,170 1,170 1,170 1,170 1,170 1,170 1,170 1,170 1,170 1,170 1,813 1,813 1,813 1,813 1,813 1,813 1,813 1,813 1,813 1,813 1,813 62.90 62.90 62.90 62.90 62.90 62.90 62.90 62.90 62.90 62.90 62.90 19.55 19.55 22.26 22.26 22.26 22.26 24.92 27.69 27.69 27.69 27.69 5.66 5.66 5.66 5.66 5.66 5.66 5.66 5.66 5.66 5.66 5.66 1,229.03$ 1,229.03$ 1,229.03$ 1,229.03$ 1,229.03$ 1,229.03$ 1,229.03$ 1,229.03$ 1,229.03$ 1,229.03$ 1,229.03$ 1,326.78$ 1,326.78$ 1,326.78$ 1,326.78$ 1,326.78$ 1,326.78$ 1,326.78$ 1,326.78$ 1,326.78$ 1,326.78$ 1,326.78$ 5,803.25$ 5,803.25$ 5,803.25$ 5,803.25$ 5,803.25$ 5,803.25$ 5,803.25$ 5,803.25$ 5,803.25$ 5,803.25$ 5,803.25$ 1,251.16$ 1,251.16$ 1,251.16$ 1,251.16$ 1,251.16$ 1,251.16$ 1,251.16$ 1,251.16$ 1,251.16$ 1,251.16$ 1,251.16$ 4,265,747$ 4,265,747$ 4,269,144$ 4,269,144$ 4,269,144$ 4,269,144$ 4,272,472$ 4,275,937$ 4,275,937$ 4,275,937$ 4,275,937$ 659.26$ 659.26$ 659.26$ 659.26$ 659.26$ 659.26$ 659.26$ 659.26$ 659.26$ 659.26$ 659.26$ 474.66$ 474.66$ 474.66$ 474.66$ 474.66$ 474.66$ 474.66$ 474.66$ 474.66$ 474.66$ 474.66$ 1,741.72$ 1,741.72$ 1,741.72$ 1,741.72$ 1,741.72$ 1,741.72$ 1,741.72$ 1,741.72$ 1,741.72$ 1,741.72$ 1,741.72$ 347.13$ 347.13$ 347.13$ 347.13$ 347.13$ 347.13$ 347.13$ 347.13$ 347.13$ 347.13$ 347.13$ 1,758,098$ 1,758,098$ 1,759,040$ 1,759,040$ 1,759,040$ 1,759,040$ 1,759,964$ 1,760,925$ 1,760,925$ 1,760,925$ 1,760,925$ Description 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 POLICE COSTS - BASE MODEL 56,965,945 59,949,430 58,327,199 59,606,056 60,916,106 62,175,703 63,461,731 Police Officer Funding (5/yr) - 760,000 1,610,000 2,550,000 3,590,000 4,710,000 5,910,000 Updated POLICE COSTS 56,965,945 60,709,430 59,937,199 62,156,056 64,506,106 66,885,703 69,371,731 FIRE COSTS - BASE MODEL 27,580,234 28,669,066 29,240,512 29,819,340 30,409,445 31,015,435 31,633,479 4.0 Truck Staffing for Millenia - - 985,000 1,040,000 2,190,000 2,300,000 2,410,000 Fire Station Supplies and Services - - 160,000 160,000 320,000 320,000 320,000 Updated Fire Costs 27,580,234 28,669,066 30,385,512 31,019,340 32,919,445 33,635,435 34,363,479 Description POLICE COSTS - BASE MODEL Police Officer Funding (5/yr) Updated POLICE COSTS FIRE COSTS - BASE MODEL 4.0 Truck Staffing for Millenia Fire Station Supplies and Services Updated Fire Costs 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 64,774,754 66,115,351 67,437,658 69,460,788 71,544,612 73,690,950 75,901,679 7,220,000 8,600,000 10,100,000 10,403,000 10,715,090 11,036,543 11,367,639 71,994,754 74,715,351 77,537,658 79,863,788 82,259,702 84,727,493 87,269,318 32,263,817 32,906,691 33,564,824 34,571,769 35,608,922 36,677,190 37,777,506 2,525,000 2,635,000 2,755,000 2,837,650 2,922,780 3,010,463 3,100,777 320,000 320,000 320,000 329,600 339,488 349,673 360,163 35,108,817 35,861,691 36,639,824 37,739,019 38,871,190 40,037,325 41,238,445 Description POLICE COSTS - BASE MODEL Police Officer Funding (5/yr) Updated POLICE COSTS FIRE COSTS - BASE MODEL 4.0 Truck Staffing for Millenia Fire Station Supplies and Services Updated Fire Costs 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 78,178,729 80,524,091 82,939,814 85,428,008 87,990,848 90,630,574 93,349,491 11,708,668 12,059,928 12,421,726 12,794,378 13,178,209 13,573,555 13,980,762 89,887,397 92,584,019 95,361,540 98,222,386 101,169,057 104,204,129 107,330,253 38,910,831 40,078,156 41,280,500 42,518,915 43,794,483 45,108,317 46,461,567 3,193,800 3,289,614 3,388,302 3,489,952 3,594,650 3,702,490 3,813,564 370,968 382,097 393,560 405,366 417,527 430,053 442,955 42,475,599 43,749,866 45,062,362 46,414,233 47,806,660 49,240,860 50,718,086 Description POLICE COSTS - BASE MODEL Police Officer Funding (5/yr) Updated POLICE COSTS FIRE COSTS - BASE MODEL 4.0 Truck Staffing for Millenia Fire Station Supplies and Services Updated Fire Costs 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 96,149,976 99,034,475 102,005,509 105,065,674 108,217,645 111,464,174 114,808,099 118,252,342 14,400,185 14,832,191 15,277,156 15,735,471 16,207,535 16,693,761 17,194,574 17,710,411 110,550,160 113,866,665 117,282,665 120,801,145 124,425,180 128,157,935 132,002,673 135,962,753 47,855,414 49,291,076 50,769,808 52,292,903 53,861,690 55,477,541 57,141,867 58,856,123 3,927,971 4,045,810 4,167,185 4,292,200 4,420,966 4,553,595 4,690,203 4,830,909 456,243 469,931 484,029 498,550 513,506 528,911 544,779 561,122 52,239,629 53,806,817 55,421,022 57,083,653 58,796,162 60,560,047 62,376,848 64,248,154 Description POLICE COSTS - BASE MODEL Police Officer Funding (5/yr) Updated POLICE COSTS FIRE COSTS - BASE MODEL 4.0 Truck Staffing for Millenia Fire Station Supplies and Services Updated Fire Costs 30 121,799,912 18,241,723 140,041,636 60,621,806 4,975,836 577,956 66,175,598 Table - Public Safety Costs by Land Use Dwelling Type Call Volume (CV) (1) Existing EDUs (2) Existing CV / DU Future EDUs (3) Projected Future CV Future SDF (4)% OF CV COSTS COST PER EDU 56,965,945$ Single Family Units 123,906,773 36,084 3,434 4,854 16,667,871 14.957%50.55%28,797,864$ 798$ Multi-Family Units 103,105,371 27,814 3,707 22,467 83,283,023 74.735%42.07%23,963,294$ 862$ Land Use Call Volume (CV) (1) Existing Acres (2) Existing CV / Acre Future Acres (3) Projected Future CV Future SDF (4)% OF CV COSTS COST PER ACRE Commercial Acres 15,176,274 936 16,214 518 8,405,596 7.543%6.19%3,527,202$ 3,768$ Industrial Acres 2,915,398 834 3,496 882 3,081,488 2.765%1.19%677,584$ 812$ Citywide Total 245,103,815 Dwelling Type Calls for Service (CFS) (1) Existing EDUs (2) Existing CFS / DU Future EDUs (3) Projected Future CFS Future SDF (4)% OF CV COSTS COST PER EDU $ 27,580,234 Single Family Units 3,893 36084 0.10789218 4854 523.708639 21.230%61.137%16,861,629$ 467.29$ Multi-Family Units 2,161 27814 0.07768169 22466.6667 1745.248693 70.749%33.930%9,357,870$ 336.44$ 6,054 Land Use Call Volume (CV) (1) Existing Acres (2) Existing CV / Acre Future Acres (3) Projected Future CV Future SDF (4)% OF CV COSTS COST PER ACRE Commercial Acres 267 936 0.28504274 518.417 147.7709996 5.990%4.190%1,155,529$ 1,234.54$ Industrial Acres 47 834 0.05681055 881.513 50.07923974 2.030%0.744%205,206$ 246.05$ 314 6,368 (1) Calls for Service include all calls for service responded to by the Fire Department during a one-year period. (2) Existing development data is per General Plan Update Fiscal Model. (3) Future development data is per March 2006 PFDIF Update - Development Forecast. (4) SDF - Service Demand Factor Police Calls for Service by Land Use Fire Calls for Service by Land Use Maintenance Costs - Project Specific YEAR 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Streets & Lighting Lane miles 3.4 7.1 7.1 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.2 Cost per unit 22,720$ 23,174$ 23,638$ 24,111$ 24,593$ 25,085$ 25,586$ 26,098$ 26,620$ 27,153$ 27,696$ 28,249$ 28,814$ 29,391$ 29,979$ 30,578$ 31,190$ Growth Factor 2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00% Extended Cost 77,248$ 164,538$ 167,829$ 197,707$ 201,661$ 205,695$ 209,809$ 214,005$ 218,285$ 222,651$ 227,104$ 231,646$ 236,279$ 241,004$ 245,824$ 250,741$ 255,755$ Parks Acres 2.90 2.90 5.13 13.24 15.63 15.63 15.63 15.63 15.63 15.63 15.63 15.63 15.63 15.63 15.63 15.63 15.63 Less: Acres by CFD 1.97 1.97 3.48 8.98 10.60 10.60 10.60 10.60 10.60 10.60 10.60 10.60 10.60 10.60 10.60 10.60 10.60 Net Acres 0.93 0.93 1.65 4.26 5.03 5.03 5.03 5.03 5.03 5.03 5.03 5.03 5.03 5.03 5.03 5.03 5.03 Cost per unit 30,175$ 30,779$ 31,394$ 32,022$ 32,662$ 33,316$ 33,982$ 34,662$ 35,355$ 36,062$ 36,783$ 37,519$ 38,269$ 39,035$ 39,815$ 40,612$ 41,424$ Growth Factor 2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00% Extended Cost 28,208$ 28,772$ 51,843$ 136,454$ 164,292$ 167,578$ 170,929$ 174,348$ 177,835$ 181,391$ 185,019$ 188,720$ 192,494$ 196,344$ 200,271$ 204,276$ 208,362$ Total Maintenance Costs 105,456$ 193,311$ 219,672$ 334,161$ 365,953$ 373,272$ 380,738$ 388,353$ 396,120$ 404,042$ 412,123$ 420,365$ 428,773$ 437,348$ 446,095$ 455,017$ 464,117$ Maintenance Costs - Project Specific YEAR Streets & Lighting Lane miles Cost per unit Growth Factor Extended Cost Parks Acres Less: Acres by CFD Net Acres Cost per unit Growth Factor Extended Cost Total Maintenance Costs 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.2 31,813$ 32,450$ 33,099$ 33,761$ 34,436$ 35,125$ 35,827$ 36,544$ 37,275$ 38,020$ 38,780$ 39,556$ 40,347$ 2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00% 260,871$ 266,088$ 271,410$ 276,838$ 282,375$ 288,022$ 293,783$ 299,658$ 305,651$ 311,764$ 318,000$ 324,360$ 330,847$ 15.63 15.63 15.63 15.63 15.63 15.63 15.63 15.63 15.63 15.63 15.63 15.63 15.63 10.60 10.60 10.60 10.60 10.60 10.60 10.60 10.60 10.60 10.60 10.60 10.60 10.60 5.03 5.03 5.03 5.03 5.03 5.03 5.03 5.03 5.03 5.03 5.03 5.03 5.03 42,252$ 43,097$ 43,959$ 44,838$ 45,735$ 46,650$ 47,583$ 48,535$ 49,505$ 50,495$ 51,505$ 52,535$ 53,586$ 2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00% 212,529$ 216,780$ 221,115$ 225,537$ 230,048$ 234,649$ 239,342$ 244,129$ 249,012$ 253,992$ 259,072$ 264,253$ 269,538$ 473,400$ 482,868$ 492,525$ 502,375$ 512,423$ 522,671$ 533,125$ 543,787$ 554,663$ 565,756$ 577,071$ 588,613$ 600,385$ Existing Library Square Feet 102,000 Current Budget 3,916,621$ Cost Per Square Foot 38.40$ Library - Project Specific Costs YEAR 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Library (Project) Square Feet 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 Percentage 100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00% Cost per unit 38.40$ 39.17$ 39.95$ 40.75$ 41.56$ 42.39$ 43.24$ 44.11$ 44.99$ 45.89$ 46.81$ 47.74$ 48.70$ 49.67$ 50.67$ 51.68$ 52.71$ Cost 1,151,947$ 1,174,986$ 1,198,486$ 1,222,456$ 1,246,905$ 1,271,843$ 1,297,280$ 1,323,225$ 1,349,690$ 1,376,684$ 1,404,217$ 1,432,302$ 1,460,948$ 1,490,167$ 1,519,970$ 1,550,369$ 1,581,377$ Growth Factor 2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00% Extended Cost 1,174,986$ 1,198,486$ 1,222,456$ 1,246,905$ 1,271,843$ 1,297,280$ 1,323,225$ 1,349,690$ 1,376,684$ 1,404,217$ 1,432,302$ 1,460,948$ 1,490,167$ 1,519,970$ 1,550,369$ 1,581,377$ 1,613,004$ Population 272,736 277,555 282,375 287,195 292,015 296,835 301,655 306,475 311,295 316,115 320,935 325,755 330,575 335,395 340,215 342,066 343,844 Per Capita Unit Cost 4.31$ 4.32$ 4.33$ 4.34$ 4.36$ 4.37$ 4.39$ 4.40$ 4.42$ 4.44$ 4.46$ 4.48$ 4.51$ 4.53$ 4.56$ 4.62$ 4.69$ Existing Library Square Feet 102,000 Current Budget 3,916,621$ Cost Per Square Foot 38.40$ Library - Project Specific Costs YEAR Library (Project) Square Feet Percentage Cost per unit Cost Growth Factor Extended Cost Population Per Capita Unit Cost 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00% 53.77$ 54.84$ 55.94$ 57.06$ 58.20$ 59.36$ 60.55$ 61.76$ 63.00$ 64.26$ 65.54$ 66.85$ 68.19$ 1,613,004$ 1,645,264$ 1,678,170$ 1,711,733$ 1,745,968$ 1,780,887$ 1,816,505$ 1,852,835$ 1,889,892$ 1,927,690$ 1,966,243$ 2,005,568$ 2,045,680$ 2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00% 1,645,264$ 1,678,170$ 1,711,733$ 1,745,968$ 1,780,887$ 1,816,505$ 1,852,835$ 1,889,892$ 1,927,690$ 1,966,243$ 2,005,568$ 2,045,680$ 2,086,593$ 345,651 347,440 349,185 350,894 352,560 354,241 355,895 357,524 359,126 360,683 362,220 363,786 365,344 4.76$ 4.83$ 4.90$ 4.98$ 5.05$ 5.13$ 5.21$ 5.29$ 5.37$ 5.45$ 5.54$ 5.62$ 5.71$ 1 June 19, 2018 ADDENDUM TO FINAL SECOND TIER EIR #07-01 (SCH #2007041074) OTAY RANCH EASTERN URBAN CENTER SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA PLAN PROJECT NAME: Eastern Urban Center (EUC) Sectional Planning Area Plan (referred to as the “Millenia” Plan) PROJECT LOCATION: Properties within the EUC bounded by Birch Road on the north, Eastlake Parkway on the east, Hunte Parkway on the south, and State Route 125 on the west. PROJECT APPLICANT: SLF IV – Millenia, LLC DATE: June 19, 2018 I. BACKGROUND Previous Approvals On September 15, 2009, the Chula Vista City Council certified the Second-Tier Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and adopted the Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan for the Eastern Urban Center (EUC) SPA Plan Project. The project involved the proposed development of approximately 207 acres within the 237-acre Otay Ranch EUC in Chula Vista, California. The EUC represents the planned extension of development within the Otay Ranch General Development Plan (GDP) area. The EUC SPA Plan defines in more detailed terms, the development parameters for the EUC, including land use mix, design criteria, primary circulation pattern, and infrastructure requirements. Since the SPA Plan was first approved in 2009, it has been amended four times in response to changes in public and private influences and actual market experiences. For similar reasons, the project applicant, SLF IV – Millenia, LLC, is proposing an amendment to the SPA Plan. The intent of the proposed amendment is to update the adopted SPA Plan to revise the buildout assumptions to reflect initial development levels and anticipated market realities, while ensuring that a degree of flexibility is maintained such that the SPA Plan can be responsive to future market and social and technological changes that will occur many years in the future, but are difficult or impossible to predict at this time (2017). Current Site Conditions Since the certification of the Final EIR, the entire project site (i.e., the EUC SPA Plan Area) has been mass graded in preparation for previously-approved development. In addition to grading, 75% of the planned roadways and utilities have been installed. Several of the planning areas have been developed or are currently under construction, with vertical development having commenced on more than 50% of the private development land. Figure 1 provides an aerial 2 June 19, 2018 overview of the graded site conditions as of 2016. In summary, the EUC (now known as “Millenia”) is currently being implemented with almost a dozen projects completed, under construction, approved, or in the Design Review phase of development. These projects include City parks, fire station and pedestrian bridge, a hotel, office, retail, and affordable, rental, mixed-use and for-sale residential, which represents virtually every land use type contemplated in the SPA Plan. The proposed amendment to the SPA Plan includes changes to the statistics in the Site Utilization Plan, design refinements to the Main Street District, and the addition of a 4-story height district. Because the modifications to the SPA Plan would not result in any increase in allowable residential units, non-residential development square footage, nor an expansion of the previously evaluated development footprint, the proposed amendment is considered to be adequately covered under FEIR #07-01 and no further analysis is warranted. Mitigation measures from the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) associated with Final EIR #07-01 are still valid and applicable to this project. The physical development of the 207 acres has been previously addressed in the certified EIR. Thus, this Addendum is focused on the proposed EUC SPA amendment as applicable to the remaining undeveloped areas of the SPA Plan. II. PROPOSED AMENDMENT The purpose of this Addendum is to address the currently proposed project, which involves an amendment to the currently adopted SPA Plan. An annotated version of the SPA Plan text, as proposed to be amended is provided as Attachment A to this Addendum. The proposed amendment includes the following primary elements: 1. Elimination of the target land use intensities and establish revised low and high land use ranges allowing a maximum project buildout of 2,983 residential units and 3.324 million square feet of commercial uses. 2. A revised Main Street concept focused on revisions to the quantity and distribution of commercial land uses. 3. Reducing the five story minimum average height on six residential parcels to a four story minimum average height. 4. To facilitate more comprehensive planning and to allow for more latitude in project design and implementation of the main street concepts, the application also introduces the concept of height blending between TM Lots 17 and 18 in the Main Street District and Lots 23 and 24 in the Central Southern Neighborhood District. The proposed amendment also includes a supplemental Public Facilities Financing Plan (PFFP) and updated fiscal study reflecting the revisions to the buildout assumptions. 3 June 19, 2018 Figure 1. Aerial Photo of Site Conditions (2016) Imagery data 2016-4-24 4 June 19, 2018 III. CEQA REQUIREMENTS Sections 15162 through 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines discuss a lead agency’s responsibilities in handling new information that was not included in a project’s certified environmental document. Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines provides: (a) When an EIR has been certified or a negative declaration adopted for a project, no subsequent EIR shall be prepared for that project unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, one or more of the following: (1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or (3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or the negative declaration was adopted, shows any of the following: a. The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or Negative Declaration; b. Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR; c. Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or d. Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. Section 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines provides that: A. The lead agency shall prepare an addendum to a previously certified EIR if some changes or additions are necessary but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred. 5 June 19, 2018 B. An addendum need not be circulated for public review but can be included in or attached to the final EIR. C. The decision-making body shall consider the addendum with the final EIR prior to making a decision on the project. D. A brief explanation of the decision not to prepare a subsequent EIR pursuant to Section 15162 should be included in an addendum to an EIR, the lead agency’s required findings on the project, or elsewhere in the record. The explanation must be supported by substantial evidence. This Addendum has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Section 15162 and 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines. The proposed changes to the project do not constitute a substantial change to the previously approved project. The proposed modifications (i.e. SPA Amendment) would not result in any environmental effects that were not considered in the previously certified EIR, nor would the changes increase the severity of any of the impacts identified in the previously certified EIR. The mitigation measures identified in the previously certified EIR would be equally applicable to the project, as revised per the proposed SPA Amendment. Therefore, in accordance with Sections 15162 and 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City has prepared this addendum to the Final Second Tier EIR (EIR #07-01). IV. ANALYSIS The environmental analysis provided below supports a determination that approval and implementation of the proposed project (i.e., SPA Amendment) would not result in any additional, or more substantial, significant environmental effects beyond those previously analyzed under the Final Second Tier EIR (EIR #07-01) for the previously approved project. Land Use, Planning, and Zoning The potential land use, planning, and zoning impacts associated with the approved project were evaluated in Section 4.1 of the Final EIR. Final EIR Conclusions The Final EIR evaluated the SPA Plan’s: (1) conformance to, or conflict with, adopted plans, policies, and regulations; and (2) effects on established communities. The Final EIR analysis determined that construction and operational impacts of the approved project on the character of the surrounding community and internally within the EUC, as well as conformance with existing land use plans and policies, would be less than significant. Analysis of the Proposed SPA Plan Amendment The proposed project would not expand or increase the development footprint as previously evaluated in the EIR. The proposed plan amendment involves changes to the buildout assumptions as shown on the adopted Site Utilization Plan (Figure 2). As shown in Figure 3 and Table 1, the proposed amendment would retain the maximum residential unit count of 2,983 residential units and reduce the target non-residential development uses from 3,487,000 square feet to a maximum of 3,324,000 square feet. The proposed plan amendment would also establish 6 June 19, 2018 low buildout targets of 1.568 million square feet of commercial uses and 1,236 residential units. Overall, should the project buildout with the maximum build of land uses, there would be a net decrease of approximately 163,000 square feet in non-residential (i.e., commercial) uses, and the same number of residential units as compared to the originally certified Final EIR. Other proposed amendments to the land use plan include a revised Main Street concept focused on revisions to the quantity and distribution of commercial land uses, reducing the five story minimum average height on six residential parcels to a four story minimum average height, and, in order to facilitate more comprehensive planning and to allow for more latitude in project design and implementation of the main street concepts, the application also introduces the concept of height blending between TM Lots 17 and 18 in the Main Street District and Lost 23 and 24 in the Central Southern Neighborhood District. These plan amendments are in response to market conditions, and do not create new significant land use impacts as compared to the originally certified Final EIR. As with the approved project, the proposed project would not result in a significant impact to conformance to, or conflict with, adopted plans, policies, and regulations; and effects on established communities. An amendment to the SPA Plan is proposed; however, the plan amendment in and of itself does not create a significant physical impact to the environment not otherwise addressed in the Final EIR #07-01. Although the overall target buildout density and intensity are modified, the Plan Amendment does not involve rearranging the distribution of land uses for the Eastern Urban Center Districts as established in the adopted SPA Plan. The proposed plan amendment responds to changing market conditions, as is reflective of changes to the land use patterns and concepts that have occurred in the surrounding vicinity of the project site. Therefore, no new significant, or more substantial impacts would occur beyond those analyzed in the Final EIR. Table 1 – Proposed Site Utilization Plan Statistics District Non-Residential (000’s Sq. Ft.)* Residential (DU’s)* Low High Low High 1 227 400 0 89 2 2 2 273 273 3 2 5 150 475 4 800 1,900 0 225 5 455 900 0 300 6 80 100 100 601 7 0 0 100 117 8 2 2 253 253 9 0 5 130 350 10 0 10 230 300 Totals 1,568 3,324 1,236 2,983 * Refer to FBC Section 04.05, for Intensity Transfer Provisions 7 June 19, 2018 Figure 2. Adopted Site Utilization Plan 8 June 19, 2018 Figure 3. Proposed Site Utilization Plan 9 June 19, 2018 Landform Alteration/Aesthetics The potential landform alteration/aesthetics impacts associated with the approved project were evaluated in Section 4.2 of the Final EIR. Final EIR Conclusions The Final EIR analyzed whether the approved project would have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista; substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic highway; substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings; be inconsistent with General Plan, GDP or other objectives and policies regarding visual character thereby resulting in a significant physical impact, or create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area. The Final EIR determined that the approved project would result in a potentially significant impact associated with a scenic roadway. An 89-foot section of the EUC is located adjacent to Hunte Parkway, a City-designated Scenic Roadway. Therefore, the Final EIR identified that a potentially significant impact with respect to the City’s Scenic Roadway standards could occur along this street section. With implementation of Mitigation Measure 4.2-1, which requires that future development will enhance the scenic quality of the route, the potential impact related to scenic roadways would be reduced to a less than significant level. The Final EIR also identified that there is a potential for streets, structures, and public places to be shadowed by adjacent building or buildings depending on climate, season, and building height and mass. Because the potential impacts associated with shade/shadow and wind access cannot be determined until the location, size, and orientation of future buildings are established, the Final EIR identified that this impact would be potentially significant. However, with implementation of Mitigation Measure 4.2-2, potential impacts regarding shadows and wind would be reduced to below a level of significance. Mitigation Measure 4.2-2 requires the project applicant to prepare a light, shadow, and wind pattern analysis for any structure eight stories and above prior to design review approval. The Final EIR also determined that the approved project would result in the degradation of the existing visual quality and character of the site and its surroundings. However, no mitigation measures are available to reduce the potentially significant impact of converting the EUC SPA Plan site from undeveloped rolling hills to urbanized uses. Thus, impacts regarding the change to the site’s visual character are concluded to be significant and unavoidable. Analysis of the Proposed SPA Plan Amendment As previously mentioned, the intent of the proposed SPA Plan amendment is to update the adopted SPA Plan to reflect the initial phases of development and to respond to market changes, while ensuring a degree of flexibility is maintained such that the SPA can still respond to future market and lifestyle changes that are difficult or impossible to predict. 10 June 19, 2018 Since the original PC District Regulations & Design Guidelines were adopted, the retail market and evolution of the “Main Street” type of development have changed due to systemic change in the retail industry as well as local market forces. One of the risks in the “Main Street” is over- building of retail which comes with the potential for vacant storefronts or underperforming, or marginal retail uses. Such an outcome could stigmatize the larger project and would not achieve the goal of providing an active, vibrant environment. The proposed amendment includes a revised Main Street concept focused on revisions to the quantity and distribution of commercial land uses to correctly size, and geographically distribute the commercial uses in the Main Street District to create the intended character while avoiding the potential for vacant storefronts. The proposed amendment also includes reducing the five story minimum average height on six residential parcels to a four story minimum average height. Additionally, the permitted height minimums are being adjusted in several of the districts to reflect more contemporary building forms expected in those districts. To facilitate more comprehensive planning and to allow for more latitude in project design and implementation of the main street concepts, the application also introduces the concept of height blending between TM Lots 17 and 18 in the Main Street District and Lots 23 and 24 in the Central Southern Neighborhood District. The overall aesthetic nature of the EUC SPA Plan Area would not be substantially different than the original project analyzed in the Final EIR. The SPA area has been mass graded, and any additional development would occur on grading pads where the previous land form has already been altered, and there would be no increase in building intensity, density or height over that allowed in the currently adopted SPA Plan. Compliance with all applicable rules and regulations governing aesthetics as well as all mitigation measures outlined in Section 4.2 of the Final EIR would ensure that no additional impacts to landform/aesthetics beyond those previously analyzed in the Final EIR would occur as a result of the proposed project. Transportation The potential transportation impacts associated with the approved project were evaluated in Section 4.3 of the Final EIR. Final EIR Conclusions The Final EIR analyzed whether the approved project would cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system; exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a LOS standard established by the County CMP agency for designated roads or highways; or conflict with adopted policies, plans or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks). The Final EIR determined that the approved project would cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system. The approved project would result in potentially significant impacts to intersections, roadway segments, freeway segments, and project boundary intersections in the Traffic Study Area. With implementation of Mitigation Measures 4.3-1 through 4.3-9, potentially significant impacts to study area intersections and roadway segments would be reduced to a less than significant level. With implementation of Mitigation Measures 4.3-10 and 4.3-11, potentially significant impacts to project boundary 11 June 19, 2018 intersections would be reduced to a less than significant level. Because no specific improvements have been identified to mitigate the project’s cumulative impacts along freeways; impacts would remain significant and unavoidable. The approved project would also have a potentially significant impact with respect to consistency with the Public Facilities Financing Plan (PFFP) thresholds. The project’s consistency with the PFFP is dependent on several variables (i.e., timing and responsibility) that are out of the control of the project. With implementation of Mitigation Measures 4.3-12 through 4.3-14, the timing of improvements would be consistent with the PFFP. The approved project was found to be consistent with General Plan and GDP policies regarding alternative transportation. However, significant delays along Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) routes due to stop controlled intersections could occur. Mitigation Measure 4.3-15 would facilitate the elimination of potential conflicts pertaining to the implementation of BRT service in the future by SANDAG through the EUC. Analysis of the Proposed SPA Plan Amendment The proposed project (proposed SPA Amendment) would not expand or increase the development footprint as previously evaluated in the EIR. The proposed plan amendment involves changes to the statistics on the Site Utilization Plan. As shown in Table 1, the proposed amendment would maintain the maximum development level of 2,983 residential units and reduce the maximum non-residential development uses from 3,487,000 square feet to a maximum of 3,324,000 square feet. Overall, there would be a net decrease of approximately 163,000 square feet in non-residential (i.e., commercial) uses, and the same number of residential units as compared to the originally certified Final EIR. The decrease in target commercial square footage would, in turn, result in the generation of less vehicular trips. Because the proposed project would generate fewer trips (both daily and during the peak hours) than the approved project and the trip distribution patterns would remain the same as those studied in the Final EIR, it can be concluded that the proposed project would add fewer trips to the surrounding transportation network, including all study area roadways, intersections, and freeways. Fewer project trips to a roadway, an intersection, or a freeway indicate less or equal potential traffic impacts. As a result, the approved project represents a worst-case scenario and no new or more substantial significant traffic impacts would occur beyond those identified in the Final EIR. Further, the mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR remain applicable and no new mitigation measures would be required. Therefore, no new significant, or more substantial impacts would occur beyond those analyzed in the Final EIR. 12 June 19, 2018 The proposed SPA Amendment would also have a potentially significant impact with respect to consistency with the Public Facilities Financing Plan (PFFP) thresholds as the approved project. The project’s consistency with the PFFP is dependent on several variables (i.e., timing and responsibility) that are out of the control of the project. With implementation of Mitigation Measures 4.3-12 through 4.3-14, the timing of improvements would be consistent with the PFFP. Therefore, no new significant, or more substantial impacts would occur beyond those analyzed in the Final EIR. The approved project was found to be consistent with General Plan and GDP policies regarding alternative transportation. However, as identified in the Final EIR for the approved project, significant delays along Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) routes due to stop controlled intersections could occur. The proposed project would reduce the overall vehicular trip generation within the EUC SPA, as a result of an overall decrease in non-residential square footage. As a result, the approved project represents a worst-case scenario and no new or more substantial significant traffic impacts would occur beyond those identified in the Final EIR. Further, the mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR remain applicable and no new mitigation measures would be required. Specifically, as it relates to potential impacts to BRT, Mitigation Measure 4.3-15 would eliminate potential conflicts pertaining to BRT service through the EUC, and the applicant will comply with this mitigation measure as applicable, for the remaining development areas of the EUC under the plan amendment. Therefore, no new significant, or more substantial impacts would occur beyond those analyzed in the Final EIR. Air Quality The potential air quality impacts associated with the approved project were evaluated in Section 4.4 of the Final EIR. Final EIR Conclusions The Final EIR analyzed whether the approved project would conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan or General Plan policies; violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation; result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors); expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations; or create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people. The Final EIR determined that the approved project would result in potentially significant air quality impacts associated with a conflict with the Regional Air Quality Strategy (RAQS) (1992). This impact would remain significant and unmitigated. The RAQS is based on the General Plan that was in effect when the RAQS were adopted in 1992 and updated through 2001. It is not consistent with the current GPU that was adopted in December 2005. Although SANDAG is currently updating the RAQS, the proposed land uses for the EUC SPA would conflict with the currently approved RAQS. 13 June 19, 2018 The approved project was also determined to exceed air quality standards. During construction, the approved project would exceed the regional significance thresholds for PM10, PM2.5, CO, NOx, and VOC. Even with implementation of Mitigation Measure 4.4-1, the approved project would still exceed the regional significance thresholds. As such, project construction would continue to result in a significant, although temporary, regional impact with incorporation of all feasible mitigation measures. During the operational phase, the approved project would result in NOx, CO, VOC, PM10 and PM2.5 emissions that would exceed applicable thresholds. The approved project would also result in a cumulatively significant long-term contribution to regional PM10, PM2.5, and ozone levels as a result of projected emissions of NOx and ROG. Even with implementation of Mitigation Measures 4.4-2 and 4.4-3, the project would result in regional emissions that exceed the applicable thresholds for NOx, CO, VOC, PM10 and PM2.5. Therefore, the approved project would result in significant and unavoidable impacts during the operational phase. Analysis of the Proposed SPA Plan Amendment The proposed project would not expand or increase the development footprint as previously evaluated in the EIR. The proposed plan amendment involves changes to the statistics on the Site Utilization Plan. However, the proposed amendment would reduce the maximum development level by approximately 163,000 square feet. Due to the reduction in total development, the construction duration would be shortened and project-generated traffic trips would be reduced compared to the approved project. This would reduce construction and operational emissions (specifically mobile sources) compared to the approved project. While emissions would be slightly reduced under the proposed project, the impacts and associated mitigation measures identified in the previously-certified Final EIR remain applicable to the proposed project. Therefore, no new significant, or more substantial impacts would occur beyond those analyzed in the Final EIR. Noise The potential noise impacts associated with the approved project were evaluated in Section 4.5 of the Final EIR. Final EIR Conclusions The Final EIR analyzed whether the approved project would result in a substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project; expose persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the Chula Vista General Plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies; result in a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project; expose persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels; or be inconsistent with General Plan, GDP or other objectives and policies regarding noise thereby resulting in a significant physical impact. 14 June 19, 2018 The Final EIR determined that the approved project would result in potentially significant noise impacts associated with traffic-generated noise; exceedance of the City’s 65 CNEL exterior residential standard for land use compatibility; on-site stationary sources (roof-top HVAC equipment and the fire station emergency generator); and, outdoor noise generated by schools and parks, including sports activities. However, with implementation of Mitigation Measures 4.5- 1 through 4.5-7, potential noise impacts would be reduced to below a level of significance. Analysis of the Proposed SPA Plan Amendment The proposed project would not expand or increase the development footprint as previously evaluated in the EIR, nor are any land use changes proposed within each of the SPA Districts. The proposed plan amendment involves changes to the statistics on the Site Utilization Plan. The proposed amendment would reduce the maximum development level by approximately 163,000 square feet. Due to the reduction in total development, project-generated traffic trips would be reduced compared to the approved project, and in turn, would minimize noise impacts associated with future traffic. Furthermore, the proposed project would not substantially change the noise-producing activities or land uses beyond those previously analyzed in the Final EIR. Compliance with all applicable rules and regulations governing noise as well as all mitigation measures outlined in Section 4.5 of the Final EIR would ensure that no additional impacts to noise beyond those previously analyzed would occur as a result of the proposed project. Therefore, no new significant, or more substantial impacts would occur beyond those analyzed in the Final EIR. Cultural Resources The potential cultural resources impacts associated with the approved project were evaluated in Section 4.6 of the Final EIR. Final EIR Conclusions The Final EIR analyzed whether the approved project would cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5; cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource as defined in CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5; directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature; or disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries; or be inconsistent with General Plan cultural and paleontological policies thereby resulting in a significant physical impact. The Final EIR determined that the approved project would not result in a significant impact on known archaeological resources, but could result in significant impacts to archaeological resources that may be uncovered during clearing and grading. The geological formations underlying the EUC SPA Plan Area have a high sensitivity for paleontological resources. Therefore, grading activities have the potential to result in significant impacts to paleontological resources. 15 June 19, 2018 The approved project was also determined to have the potential to uncover human remains during site preparation. With implementation of Mitigation Measures 4.6-1 through 4.6-9, potential impacts to cultural and paleontological resources and human remains would be reduced to below a level of significance. Analysis of the Proposed SPA Plan Amendment Since the certification of the Final EIR, the entire EUC SPA Plan Area has been mass-graded, 75 percent of the planned roadways and utilities have been installed, and vertical development has commenced on more than 50% of the private development land. Pursuant to the project’s MMRP, mitigation measures identified for cultural resources (Mitigation Measures 4.6-1 through 4.6-9) were implemented during the prior mass grading activities. The proposed project would not expand or increase the development footprint as previously evaluated in the EIR. No additional cultural resources impacts would occur and the conclusions identified in the previously-certified Final EIR remain accurate. Therefore, no new significant, or more substantial impacts would occur beyond those analyzed in the Final EIR. Biological Resources The potential biological resources impacts associated with the approved project were evaluated in Section 4.7 of the EIR. Final EIR Conclusions The Final EIR analyzed whether the approved project would have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Wildlife Service; have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service; have a substantial adverse effect on Federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means; interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites; conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance; or, conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan. As identified in the Final EIR, no sensitive plant species, sensitive plant communities, or wetlands occur within the EUC SPA Plan Area. The EUC SPA Plan Area is not within a regional wildlife corridor and would not impact regional wildlife movement. As described in the Final EIR, the approved project (specifically within the EUC SPA Plan Area) would have the following substantial adverse effect, both directly and through habitat modifications, on sensitive wildlife species:  Ground nesting raptor species, including the northern harrier and burrowing owl. 16 June 19, 2018  The northern harrier, burrowing owl, white-tailed kite, and San Diego black-tailed jackrabbit would be impacted by the loss of agricultural lands utilized as foraging habitat. The approved project was also determined to have the potential to impact nesting bird species protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and California Fish and Game Code. With implementation of Mitigation Measures 4.7-1 through 4.7-13, potential impacts to biological resources would be reduced to below a level of significance. Analysis of the Proposed SPA Plan Amendment Since the certification of the Final EIR, the EUC SPA Plan Area has been mass-graded and prepared in anticipation of planned development. As such, the project site does not contain any natural vegetation or sensitive biological habitats; riparian, aquatic or wetland habitat; or federally protected wetlands. Pursuant to the project’s MMRP, mitigation measures identified for biological resources (Mitigation Measures 4.7-1 through 4.7-13) were implemented during the prior mass grading activities. The proposed project would not expand or increase the development footprint as previously evaluated in the EIR. No additional biological resources impacts would occur and the conclusions identified in the previously-certified Final EIR remain accurate and applicable to the proposed project. Therefore, no new significant, or more substantial impacts would occur beyond those analyzed in the Final EIR. Agricultural Resources The potential agricultural resources impacts associated with the approved project were evaluated in Section 4.8 of the Final EIR. Final EIR Conclusions The Final EIR analyzed whether the approved project would convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance, as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the FMMP of the California Resources Agency, to nonagricultural use; and/or involves other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of farmland to nonagricultural use; or conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or a Williamson Act contract. In addition, impacts to agricultural resources would be significant if the proposed project would be inconsistent with General Plan agricultural resource policies thereby resulting in a significant physical impact. The Final EIR determined that the approved project would have no impacts to Williamson Act contract lands or conflict with existing zoning for an agricultural use. As analyzed in the EIR, development of the EUC SPA Plan would result in a significant impact to agricultural resources, due to the on-site loss of approximately 207 acres of Farmland of Local Importance. Implementation of Mitigation Measure 4.8-1 would reduce potentially significant, short-term impacts caused by adjacency of agricultural uses and urban uses to a less than significant level. However, the incremental and cumulative loss of agricultural lands (Farmland of Local Importance), which was considered a significant impact in the Otay Ranch GDP Program EIR, remains significant, and no mitigation measures are available to reduce this impact to below a level of significance. 17 June 19, 2018 Analysis of the Proposed SPA Plan Amendment Since the certification of the Final EIR, the EUC SPA Plan Area has been mass-graded and prepared in anticipation of planned development. The proposed project would not expand or increase the development footprint as previously evaluated in the EIR. No additional agricultural resources impacts would occur and the conclusions identified in the previously-certified Final EIR remain accurate. Therefore, no new significant, or more substantial impacts would occur beyond those analyzed in the Final EIR. Hydrology and Water Quality The potential hydrology and water quality impacts associated with the construction and operation of the approved project were evaluated in Section 4.9 of the Final EIR. Final EIR Conclusions The Final EIR analyzed whether the approved project would result in an increase in pollutant discharges to receiving waters Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level; substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site or City of Chula Vista Engineering Standards for storm water flows and volumes; substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site, or place structures within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map which would impede or redirect flood flows; create or contribute runoff water, which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff; or be inconsistent with General Plan, GDP or other objectives and policies regarding water quality thereby resulting in a significant physical impact. As discussed in the Final EIR, the approved project would require mass grading; therefore, there is potential degradation of water quality as a result of erosion of exposed soils. The approved project would introduce human occupation, land uses, or vehicles that have the potential to introduce pollutants during operation and potentially impact surface and ground water quality. In addition, the approved project would require the development of streets and other impermeable surfaces that would increase surface water runoff and cause potentially significant off-site erosion to downstream facilities. The EIR determined that the approved project’s potentially significant impact with respect to water quality standards and drainage (erosion/flooding), and runoff water would be reduced to less than significant through the enforcement of existing state and federal regulatory standards and proposed mitigation measures. Also, the approved project would implement a program to bury existing soil contaminants or provide a Stormwater Prevention Pollution Plan (SWPPP) to address drainage from existing stockpiled soils (undocumented fill, construction material, and construction debris). With implementation of Mitigation Measures 4.9- 1 through 4.9-10, potential impacts to hydrology and water quality would be reduced to below a level of significance. 18 June 19, 2018 Analysis of the Proposed SPA Plan Amendment Since the certification of the Final EIR, the EUC SPA Plan Area has been mass-graded and prepared in anticipation of planned development. The proposed project has obtained coverage and will continue to comply with all applicable rules and regulations including compliance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit requirements for urban runoff and stormwater discharge BMPs for design, treatment, and monitoring for stromwater quality would be implemented as delineated in the Final EIR with respect to municipal and construction permits. Compliance with all applicable rules and regulations governing water quality as well as all mitigation measures outlined in Section 4.9 of the Final EIR would ensure that no additional impacts to water quality beyond those previously analyzed would occur as a result of the proposed project. Therefore, no new significant, or more substantial impacts would occur beyond those analyzed in the Final EIR. Geology and Soils The potential geology, soils, and seismicity impacts associated with the approved project were evaluated in Section 4.10 of the Final EIR. Final EIR Conclusions The Final EIR analyzed whether the approved project would expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault. (refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42); strong seismic ground shaking; seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction; and/or landslides; result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil; be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse; or be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property; or be inconsistent with General Plan geotechnical policies thereby resulting in a significant physical impact. The Final EIR determined that the approved project would have potentially significant impacts associated with unstable soils, soil erosion and/or loss of topsoil, landslides, lateral spreading, liquefaction and/or collapse, and expansive soils. However, with implementation of Mitigation Measures 4.10-1 through 4.10-3, all potentially significant geology and soils impacts would be reduced to a less than significant level. Analysis of the Proposed SPA Plan Amendment Since the certification of the Final EIR, the entire EUC SPA Plan Area has been mass-graded and prepared in anticipation of planned development. Pursuant to the project’s MMRP, Mitigation Measure 4.10-1 identified for geology and soils was implemented during the prior mass grading activities. Final EIR Mitigation Measure 4.10-2 addressed the off-site stockpile grading alternative. 19 June 19, 2018 The off-site stockpile grading alternative was not implemented and therefore compliance with Mitigation Measure 4.10-2 was not required. Final EIR Mitigation Measure 4.10-3 requires that the City shall ensure that the applicable recommendations in the Geotechnical Investigation for the Proposed Salt Creek Gravity Sewer Interceptor Project, Leighton & Associates, dated October 2000, have been incorporated into the project to the satisfaction of the City Engineer of the City of Chula Vista. The requirement for this mitigation measure has not been triggered as part of development activities to date; however, the applicant will comply with this measure at the time it is required (i.e., Salt Creek Gravity Sewer Interceptor Improvements). There have been no changes to the geological or seismic environment or changes to the characteristics of the project as evaluated in the EIR that would affect these resources. The proposed project would not expand or increase the development footprint as previously evaluated in the EIR. No additional geology and soils impacts would occur and the conclusions identified in the previously-certified Final EIR remain accurate. Therefore, no new significant, or more substantial impacts would occur beyond those analyzed in the Final EIR. Public Services and Utilities The potential public services and utilities impacts associated with the approved project were evaluated in Section 4.11 of the Final EIR. Final EIR Conclusions The Final EIR analyzed whether the approved project would result in a substantial adverse physical impact associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for fire protection and emergency services; reduce the ability of properly equipped and staffed fire and medical units to respond to calls throughout the City within seven minutes in 80 percent of the cases; be inconsistent with General Plan, GDP, and other objectives and policies regarding fire protection and emergency medical services thereby resulting in a significant physical impact. The Final EIR concluded that all impacts to fire services; police services; schools; library services; parks, recreation, open space and trails; water; wastewater; and solid waste would be reduced to below a level of significance with implementation of mitigation measures, payment of Public Facility Development Impact Fees or compliance with the project Development or Parks Agreements. Analysis of the Proposed SPA Plan Amendment The proposed project would not expand or increase the development footprint as previously evaluated in the EIR. The proposed plan amendment involves changes to the statistics on the Site Utilization Plan. The proposed amendment would reduce the maximum development level by approximately 163,000 square feet. Due to the reduction in total development, project-related 20 June 19, 2018 demand for public services and utilities would be reduced compared to the approved project. Compliance with all applicable rules and regulations governing public services and utilities as well as all mitigation measures outlined in Section 4.11 of the Final EIR would ensure that no additional impacts to public services and utilities beyond those previously analyzed would occur as a result of the proposed project. Therefore, no new significant, or more substantial impacts would occur beyond those analyzed in the Final EIR. Hazards/Risk of Upset The potential hazards and hazardous materials impacts associated with the approved project were evaluated in Section 4.12 of the Final EIR. Final EIR Conclusions The Final EIR analyzed whether the approved project would be located on a site that is included on a list of hazardous materials sites, creates a significant hazard to the public or the environment; creates a significant hazard to the public or environment through the routine transport, use or disposal of hazardous materials; creates a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment; emits hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school; is located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport and would result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area; is located within the vicinity of a private airstrip and would result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area; impairs implementation of or physically interferes with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan; exposes people or structures to a significant risk or loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas, increase in urbanization would result in an increase in the uses, transport, storage, and disposal of hazardous waste materials and an associated increase in the risk of an upset condition in the area; and historic use of pesticides which would result in soil contamination and health effects or be inconsistent with General Plan, GDP, and other objectives and policies regarding hazards thereby resulting in a significant physical impact. As described in the Final EIR, potentially significant impacts could result from the exposure of construction workers and the public to organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) occurring in soils in Areas A, B, and C of the EUC. Exposure may result from any OCP-containing soils that would be released or become airborne during excavation, be left uncovered on-site, or exported off-site. The EUC SPA Plan includes an approximately 6-acre elementary school site. The presence of organic toxins and gases at the future school site may exceed the Chula Vista Elementary School District and state standards for public schools. If weeds or brush are allowed to develop in vacant areas of the EUC adjacent to occupied development, a potentially significant fire impact could occur. In addition, hazards associated with the poor visibility of tall structures under construction or rooftop cranes may contribute to an airport-related hazard, due to the proximity of Brown Field and aircraft over flight of the EUC under visual flight rules or circle-to-land procedures. Also, as 21 June 19, 2018 buildings, rooftop cranes and other temporary construction equipment in the EUC may exceed 170 feet in height, these structures would be approximately 270 feet higher than the Brown Field runway elevation. This may present an aircraft safety hazard. The Final EIR determined that compliance with existing ordinances, in combination with Mitigation Measures 4.12-1 through 4.12-6, would reduce potentially significant impacts associated with hazards and risks to less than significant. Analysis of the Proposed SPA Plan Amendment Since the certification of the Final EIR, the EUC SPA Plan Area has been mass-graded and prepared in anticipation of planned development. Pursuant to the project’s MMRP, Mitigation Measures 4.12-1 and 4.12-2 were implemented during the prior mass grading activities. Mitigation Measure 4.12-1 required that grading within Areas A, B, and C of the EUC be managed in accordance with the remediation measures included in the Organic Pesticide Assessment and Soil Reuse Plan (prepared by Geocon dated June 5, 2007, revised October 4, 2007). Mitigation Measure 4.12-2 required the project applicant to implement Best Management Practices in Areas A, B, and C of the EUC during excavation and placement of soil from the upper two feet of existing grade, so that dust, erosion, excessive pooling, and stormwater runoff would not pose a problem at the site to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Documentation of compliance was provided to the City in the form of as-graded reports. The proposed project would not expand or increase the development footprint as previously evaluated in the EIR. Compliance with all applicable rules and regulations governing hazards and hazardous materials as well as mitigation measures outlined in Section 4.12 of the Final EIR would ensure that no additional impacts to hazards or hazardous materials beyond those previously analyzed would occur as a result of the proposed project. Since the proposed project is in the same location as the approved project, compliance with Mitigation Measure 4.12-4 (FAA notification) will be required in order to reduce airport-related hazards due to proximity to Brown Field. The proposed project will also be required to implement Mitigation Measures 4.12-3 (post information regarding households hazard waste collection within each residential unit), 4.12-5 (brush and weed control) and 4.12-6 (fire station design compliance with applicable fuel storage and containment regulations). No additional hazards or hazardous materials impacts would occur and the conclusions and mitigation measures identified in the previously-certified Final EIR remain accurate and applicable to the proposed project. Housing and Population The potential housing and population impacts associated with the approved project were evaluated in Section 4.13 of the Final EIR. Final EIR Conclusions The Final EIR analyzed whether the approved project would induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (i.e., by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (i.e., through extension of roads or other infrastructure); displace substantial numbers of existing housing or 22 June 19, 2018 people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere, or be inconsistent with General Plan, GDP, and other objectives and policies regarding housing and population thereby resulting in a significant physical impact. The Final EIR concluded that the approved project’s maximum development level (2,983 residential units) would not induce substantial population growth in the area beyond that already planned under the Otay Ranch GDP and Chula Vista General Plan. With the development of 2,983 multi-family residential units, the approved project is expected to generate a population of 7,696 under a 2.58 household coefficient set forth in the Otay Ranch GDP. This population growth would not exceed forecasted growth in the Otay Ranch GDP, or in the General Plan’s East Planning Area, both of which are based on a development cap in the GDP of 2,983 residential units. In addition, the Final EIR determined that the approved project would not displace any existing households or people. Analysis of the Proposed SPA Plan Amendment The proposed EUC SPA amendment involves changes to the statistics on the Site Utilization Plan. As shown in Table 1, the proposed amendment would maintain the maximum residential development of 2,983 residential units. This number of dwelling units is the same as the development cap in the GDP of 2,983 residential units. Therefore, the proposed project would not induce substantial population growth in the area beyond that already planned under the Otay Ranch GDP and Chula Vista General Plan. There would be no new impact, or increase in the severity of an impact related to population and housing, and the conclusions identified in the Final EIR remain accurate. Global Climate Change The potential global climate change impacts associated with the approved project were evaluated in Section 4.14 of the Final EIR. Final EIR Conclusions The Final EIR analyzed whether the approved project would conflict with or obstruct goals or strategies of the California Global Solutions Act of 2006 (AB32) or related Executive Orders and/or whether the project result in substantially increased exposure of the project from the potential adverse effects of global warming identified in the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (AB32). The Final EIR concluded that the approved project would not result in significant global climate change impacts. The Final EIR determined that by incorporating project features (i.e., land use and community design, transit facilities, energy efficiency, and water efficiency) contained in the EUC SPA Plan’s Sustainability Element, the approved project would result in greenhouse gas (GHG) emission rates 31 percent lower than “business as usual.” Because these project features would reduce project GHG emissions and are consistent with the State’s Climate Action Team strategies, the approved project would not conflict with or obstruct the State’s goals regarding global climate change and impacts in this regard would be less than significant. Regarding GHG emissions from construction activities, construction of the proposed project would incorporate 23 June 19, 2018 construction “best practices,” that would reduce GHG emissions. These “best practices” represent an improvement above conventional construction practices, and thus are an improvement above “business as usual.” Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. Analysis of the Proposed SPA Plan Amendment The proposed project would not expand or increase the development footprint as previously evaluated in the EIR. The proposed plan amendment involves changes to the statistics on the Site Utilization Plan. The proposed amendment would reduce the maximum development level by approximately 163,000 square feet. Due to the reduction in total development and average daily trips compared to the approved project, energy usage and water demand would be reduced under the proposed project. Therefore, GHG emissions would be reduced under the proposed project. The GHG reducing project features contained in the EUC SPA Plan’s Sustainability Element would still be applicable to the proposed project. No additional global climate change impacts would occur and the conclusions and mitigation measures identified in the previously- certified Final EIR remain accurate and applicable to the proposed project. V. CONCLUSION Based on the findings and information contained in the previously-certified EIR, the analysis above, the CEQA statute and State CEQA Guidelines, including Sections 15164 and 15162, the proposed modifications will not result in any new, increased, or substantially different impacts, other than those previously considered and addressed in the Project EIR. The proposed project will result in only minor technical changes or additions which are necessary to make the Environmental Impact Report adequate under CEQA. No changes or additions to the previously- certified EIR analyses are necessary, nor is there a need for any additional mitigation measures. Therefore, a Supplemental EIR is not required. This Addendum to the EIR is the appropriate environmental documentation for the proposed modifications to the project. ________________________________ Jeff Steichen Associate Planner 24 June 19, 2018 ATTACHMENT A ANNOTATED PROJECT DESCRIPTION Recording Requested By: and When Recorded Mail To: City Clerk City of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, California 91910 EXEMPT FROM RECORDER’S FEES Pursuant to GOVERNMENT CODE §6103 (ABOVE SPACE FOR RECORDER'S USE ONLY) FIRST AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (ORIGINALLY BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND McMILLIN OTAY RANCH LLC) -3- FIRST AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT This First Amendment to Development Agreement (“First Amendment”) is made and entered into by and between the CITY OF CHULA VISTA, a chartered California municipal corporation (“City”) and SLF IV - MILLENIA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Master Developer”) and is dated for reference purposes only as of _________, 2018. The City and Master Developer are sometimes referred to jointly in this Agreement as the “Parties” and individually as a “Party.” Capitalized terms used in this First Amendment are defined in the Original Agreement (defined below) unless defined or redefined in Section 1 of this First Amendment. RECITALS A. Original Agreement. City and Master Developer’s predecessor in interest previously entered into the Development Agreement By and Between the City of Chula Vista and McMillin Otay Ranch LLC (the “Original Agreement”). The Original Agreement was duly approved by both Parties and recorded on October 27, 2009 as Document No. 2009- 0595116 of Official Records in the Office of the San Diego County Recorder. B. Identity of Master Developer. Master Developer succeeded to the position of the Master Developer after the Original Agreement took effect. C. Purpose of First Amendment. Master Developer has requested that the City amend the SPA Plan in a way that constitutes a Material Change to the Project. Section 2.13.3 of the Original Agreement requires that this be done by an amendment thereto. The amendment to the SPA Plan being proposed would only affect the Remaining Property and thus, according to Section 2.13 of the Original Agreement, does not require approval of any Owner other than Master Developer. D. Effect of SPA Plan Amendment. The amendment to the SPA Plan proposed by Master Developer would reduce the total amount of Development in Millenia without reducing infrastructure. E. Authorization. City is authorized to enter into this First Amendment pursuant to Chula Vista City Council Resolution No. 11933, California GOVERNMENT CODE §65864 et seq., the City Charter, and City’s self-rule powers, all of which authorize City to enter into and amend binding development agreements with persons having equitable or legal interests in real property, for the purposes of assuring, among other things: (i) certainty as to permitted land uses in the development of such property; and (ii) the construction of adequate public facilities to serve such development of the property. F. Interest in Remaining Property. Master Developer represents that it is the fee owner of the Remaining Property. Master Developer further represents that it has the legal authority to bind the Remaining Property by recordation of this First Amendment. -4- G. Planning Commission Hearing on First Amendment. On ___________, 2018, City’s Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on this First Amendment and at the conclusion of the hearing recommended approval of this First Amendment. H. City Council Hearing on First Amendment. On __________________, 2018, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on this First Amendment, at the conclusion of which the Council introduced and conducted the first reading of the ordinance approving the First Amendment; and subsequently, on ___________, 2018, adopted Ordinance No. ______ approving the First Amendment. As part of its initial hearing, the City Council considered and approved the environmental documentation for this First Amendment as being in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act, and found that this First Amendment and the Project are consistent with the Land Use Regulations. AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, in light of the Recitals, which are hereby incorporated into this First Amendment, and for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows: 1. Definitions. As used in this First Amendment, in addition to terms defined in the Original Agreement the following terms shall have the following meanings: 1.1 Remaining Property shall mean the real property legally described in Exhibit “F” hereto and incorporated herein. 1.2 Revised SPA Plan shall mean the Sectional Planning Area Plan for the EUC approved by the City on ___________, 2018, by Resolution No. ___________. 2. Revision to SPA Plan. As to the Remaining Property, all provisions of the Original Agreement referring to the SPA Plan are hereby amended so as to refer to the Revised SPA Plan. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, uses, densities, intensities, heights, sizes, reservations, and dedications on the Remaining Property shall be those in the Revised SPA Plan rather than the Spa Plan. Exhibit “G” hereto, incorporated herein by this reference, is the list of Existing Entitlements applicable to the Remaining Property. 3. Intent of First Amendment. The substantive intent of this First Amendment is limited to substituting the Revised SPA Plan for the SPA Plan as to the Remaining Property. No other substantive change to the Original Agreement is intended hereby. Except as expressly amended hereby, the Original Agreement remains in full force and effect on its own terms. The “Development Agreement” shall constitute the Original Agreement as amended by this First Amendment. 4. Miscellaneous. 4.1 Notices. Solely to document the change in ownership, the Parties note that notice to Master Developer should be sent to: -5- If to Master Developer: SLF IV - MILLENIA, LLC c/o Meridian Development Attn: Mr. Todd Galarneau 9988 Hibert Street, Suite 210 San Diego, California 92131 With a copy to: Hecht Solberg Robinson Goldberg & Bagley LLP 600 West Broadway, Suite 800 San Diego, California 92101 Attn: Richard A. Schulman IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Master Developer and City have executed this First Amendment on the date first above written. [Signature Page Follows] -6- City: CITY OF CHULA VISTA, a chartered California municipal corporation By Its Master Developer: SLF IV - MILLENIA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company BY: SLF IV Millenia Investor, LLC, a Texas limited liability company, its sole and managing member BY: Stratford Land Fund IV, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, its co-managing member BY: Stratford Fund IV GP, LLC, a Texas limited liability company, its general partner By: Name: Title: ATTEST: __________________________ By APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY By APPROVED AS TO FORM: HECHT SOLBERG ROBINSON GOLDBERG & BAGLEY LLP By Richard A. Schulman, Attorneys for Master Developer SLF IV - MILLENIA, LLC F-1 EXHIBIT “F” LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF REMAINING PROPERTY That certain real property located in the City of Chula Vista, County of San Diego, State of California and more particularly described as follows: LOTS J THROUGH M, INCLUSIVE, IN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 15942 FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY ON SEPTEMBER 23, 2013, AND LOTS 1, 8, 11 THROUGH 13, INCLUSIVE, 15, 16, 19, 21 AND 22, AND LOTS A, F THROUGH K, INCLUSIVE, M AND N, IN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 16081 FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY ON DECEMBER 28, 2015 AND LOT A IN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 16150 FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY ON NOVEMBER 30, 2016. G-1 EXHIBIT “G” LIST OF “EXISTING ENTITLEMENTS” APPLICABLE TO THE REMAINING PROPERTY 1. Eastern Urban Center Final Second Tier EIR (EIR-07-01) 2. Eastern Urban Center Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan _____ 3. Eastern Urban Center Tentative Map (PCS-09-03) 4. Development Agreement between the City of Chula Vista and McMillin Otay Ranch LLC (PCM-06-08(B)) 5. Eastern Urban Center Parks Agreement (PCM-06-08(C)) 4840-8471-7407_1 ORDINANCE NO.______________ ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE EASTERN URBAN CENTER PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT REGULATIONS AND DESIGN PLAN (FORM BASED CODE) FOR 207 ACRES OF LAND IN THE EASTERN URBAN CENTER PORTION OF THE OTAY RANCH RELATING TO MODIFICATIONS IN THE OVERALL BUILDOUT INTENSITY, BUILDING HEIGHTS AND DISTRICT 6 REGULATIONS I.RECITALS A.Project Site WHEREAS, the area of land that is the subject of this Ordinance is diagrammatically represented in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated into this Ordinance, and commonly known as the Eastern Urban Center (EUC), and for the purpose of general description herein consists of 207 acres located adjacent to and east of SR-125, adjacent to and west of Eastlake Parkway, south of Birch Road and the Otay Ranch Town Center, and north of the future extension of Main Street (“Project Site”); and B.Project; Application for Discretionary Approvals WHEREAS, a duly verified application was filed with the City of Chula Vista Development Services Department on May 24, 2017 by SLF IV-Millenia, LLC (the “Applicant,” “Owner” and “Developer”) requesting approval of an EUC Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan and Form Based Code (FBC) amendment to: 1) establish a maximum land use intensity of 2,983 residential units and 3.324 million square feet of commercial uses with a low build out of 1,236 units of residential and 1.568 million square feet of non-residential land uses; 2) modify design standards to: a. revise the Minimum Average Height on six lots from five stories to four stories and modify the minimum height in feet in the Regulating Plan, b. establish a “height blending” for Districts 6 and 9, and c. establish deviations for setbacks; and 3) revise the Main Street District (District 6) to reduce the amount of non-residential use to a low of 80,000 and high of 100,000 square feet, further modifying Section 02.04.003 of the District Regulations and Design Guidelines; and C.Environmental Determination WHEREAS, The Director of Development Services has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the project was covered in previously adopted Final Second Tier Environmental Impact Report, EIR 07-01. The Director of Development Services Ordinance No. __________ Page 2 has determined that only minor technical changes or additions to this document are necessary and that none of the conditions described in Section 15162 and 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines calling for the preparation of a subsequent document have occurred; therefore, the Director of Development Services has prepared an addendum to the Final Second Tier Environmental Impact Report, EIR 07-01; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the Addendum to EIR 07-01 has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of CEQA, and the Environmental Procedures of the City of Chula Vista; and D.Planning Commission Record of Application WHEREAS, the Director of Development Services set the time and place for a hearing on the Project, and notice of the hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, and its mailing to property owners within 500 feet of the exterior boundary of the Project Site at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held an advertised public hearing onJune 13, 2018 on the Project to adopt Resolution MPA17-0005 recommending that the City Council amend the EUC SPA Plan and FBC; and WHEREAS, the proceedings and all evidence introduced before the Planning Commission at the public hearing on the Project and the minutes and Resolution resulting therefrom, are incorporated into the record of this proceeding; and E. City Council Record of Application WHEREAS,the City Clerk set the time and place for the hearing on the Project application and notices of said hearing, together with its purposes given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, and its mailing to property owners within 500 feet of the exterior boundaries of the Project Site at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, the duly noticed and called public hearing on the Project was held before the City Council in the Council Chambers in the City Hall, Chula Vista Civic Center, 276 Fourth Avenue, to receive the recommendations of the Planning Commission, and to hear public testimony with regard to the same. II.NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby find, determine and ordain as follows: A.CONSISTENCY WITH GENERAL PLAN The City Council finds that the proposed amendment to the EUC Planned Ordinance No. __________ Page 3 Community District Regulations and Form Based Code are consistent with the City of Chula Vista General Plan. The General Plan envisions the EUC as a vibrant transit-oriented high intensity urban center serving the City and Otay Ranch master plan community. B.APPROVAL OF PROPOSED AMENDMENTS The City Council hereby approves the amendments to the Eastern Urban Center PlannedCommunity District Regulations and Design Guidelines (Form Based Code) as represented in Exhibit Battached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. III.EFFECTIVE DATE This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force on the thirtieth day from and after its adoption. Presented by Approved as to form by: _____________________________________________ Kelly Broughton Glen R. Googins Director of Development Services City Attorney RESOLUTION __________ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA CONSIDERING THE MODIFICATIONS TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL PUBLIC FACILITIES FINANCING PLAN (PFFP) AND FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS (FIA) AND APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE EASTERN URBAN CENTER SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA (SPA) PLAN AND ASSOCIATED REGULATORY DOCUMENTS RELATING TO MODIFICATIONS IN THE OVERALL BUILDOUT INTENSITY, BUILDING HEIGHTS AND DISTRICT 6 REGULATIONS I.RECITALS A.Project Site WHEREAS, the area of land that is the subject of this Resolution is diagrammatically represented in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated into this Resolution, and commonly known as the Eastern Urban Center (EUC), and for the purpose of general description herein consists of 207 acres located adjacent to and east of SR-125, adjacent to and west of Eastlake Parkway, south of Birch Road and the Otay Ranch Town Center, and north of the future extension of Main Street (Project Site); and B.Project; Application for Discretionary Approvals WHEREAS, a duly verified application was filed with the City of Chula Vista Development Services Department on May 24, 2017 by SLF IV-Millenia, LLC (the “Applicant,” “Owner” and “Developer”) requesting approval of an EUC Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan and Form Based Code (FBC) amendment to: 1) establish a maximum land use intensity of 2,983 residential units and 3.324 million square feet of commercial uses with a low build out of 1,236 units of residential and 1.568 million square feet of non-residential land uses; 2) modify design standards to: a. revise the Minimum Average Height on six lots from five stories to four stories and modify the minimum height in feet in the Regulating Plan, b. establish a “height blending” for Districts 6 and 9, and c. establish deviations for setbacks; and 3) revise the Main Street District (District 6) to reduce the amount of non-residential use to a low of 80,000 and high of 100,000 square feet, further modifying Section 02.04.003 of the District Regulations and Design Guidelines; and C.Prior Discretionary Approvals WHEREAS, development of the Project Site has been the subject matter of various entitlements and agreements, including: 1) a SPA Plan including Public Facilities Financing Plan, Affordable Housing Program and other regulatory documents approved by City Resolution No. ______ Page 2 Council Resolution No. 2009-224 on September 15, 2009; and 2) Planned Community District Regulations approved by City Council Ordinance No. 3142 on October 6, 2009; and 3) SPA Plan Amendment approved by City Council Ordinance No. 3257 and City Council Resolution No. 2013-038 in March 2013; and WHEREAS, no amendments are being proposed at this time to the “Agreement Regarding Construction of Parks in a Portion of the Otay Ranch Eastern Urban Center” (the “Parks Agreement”), which was entered into with original entitlements and subsequently amended twice (once in 2015 and once in 2016), and is based on a build-out of 2,983 residential units (but contemplates the possibility of 2,550 units); and D.Environmental Determination WHEREAS, the Director of Development Services has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the project was previously covered in adopted Second-Tier Final Environmental Impact Report, EIR 07-01. The Director of Development Services has determined that only minor technical changes or additions to this document are necessary and that none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines calling for the preparation of a subsequent document have occurred; therefore, the Development Services Director has prepared an addendum to EIR 07-01; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the Addendum to EIR 07-01 has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of CEQA, and the Environmental Procedures of the City of Chula Vista; and E. Planning Commission Record of Application WHEREAS, the Director of Development Services set the time and place for a hearing on the Project, and notice of the hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, and its mailing to property owners within 500 feet of the exterior boundary of the Project Site at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held an advertised public hearing on June 13, 2018 on the Project and voted to adopt Resolution No. MPA17-0005 recommending that the City Council amend the EUC SPA Plan and associated regulatory documents inclusive of the Public facilities Financing Plan (PFFP) and updated Fiscal Impact Analysis (FIA); and WHEREAS, the proceedings and all evidence introduced before the Planning Commission at the public hearing on the Project and the minutes and Resolution resulting therefrom, are incorporated into the record of this proceeding; and Resolution No. ______ Page 3 F. City Council Record of Application WHEREAS, the City Clerk set the time and place for the hearing on the Project application and notices of said hearing, together with its purpose given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, and its mailing to property owners within 500 feet of the exterior boundaries of the Project Site at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, the duly noticed and called public hearing on the Project was held before the City Council in the Council Chambers in the City Hall, Chula Vista Civic Center, 276 Fourth Avenue, to receive the recommendations of the Planning Commission, and to hear public testimony with regard to the same. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista hereby finds, determines, and resolves as follows: II.CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH CEQA The City Council finds that, in the exercise of their independent review and judgment, the addendum to EIR 07-01 in the form presented, has been prepared in accordance with requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Review Procedures of the City of Chula Vista and adopts the Addendum to EIR-07-01. III.SPA FINDINGS A. THE SPA PLAN, AS AMENDED, IS IN CONFORMITY WITH THE OTAY RANCH GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND THE CHULA VISTA GENERAL PLAN AND ITS SEVERAL ELEMENTS. The proposed amendments are consistent with the previously approved plans and regulations applicable to surrounding sites and, therefore, the proposed amendments can be planned and zoned in coordination and substantial compatibility with said development B. THE SPA PLAN, AS AMENDED, WILL PROMOTE THE ORDERLY SEQUENTIALIZED DEVELOPMENT OF THE INVOLVED SECTIONAL PLANNING AREAS. The Eastern Urban Center SPA Plan as amended, will maintain existing provisions and requirements to ensure the orderly, phased development of the project prior to or current with the need for said public facilities. C. THE SPA PLAN, AS AMENDED, WILL NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT ADJACENT Resolution No. ______ Page 4 LAND USE, RESIDENTIAL ENJOYMENT, CIRCULATION, OR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY. The modifications proposed have no change in existing entitlements for residential use and propose a decrease in non-residential use, therefore have no impact on surrounding uses outside of Millenia or on public amenities or infrastructure. IV. APPROVAL OF SPA AMENDMENTS Based on the findings above, the City Council approves the EUC SPA Plan as amended and shown in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated into this Resolution subject to the conditions set forth below: 1. Prior to the 30 th day after the accompanying Ordinance becomes effective, the Applicant shall prepare a clean copy of the SPA Plan document by deleting all strike out/underlines and shading. Where the document contains an existing and proposed exhibit, the previous existing exhibit shall be removed and substituted. In addition, the revised text, document format, maps and statistical changes within the EUC SPA and Form Based Code shall be approved by the Director of Development Services for printing prior to incorporating said revisions into the final document. 2. Prior to the 30th day after the accompanying Ordinance becomes effective, the Applicant shall submit to the Development Services Department 10 copies and a CD of the approved amendment to the EUC SPA Plan and Planned Community (PC) District Regulations. 3. Applicant to comply with all the conditions of approval of the Otay Ranch EUC SPA Plan incorporated in Resolution 2009-224 and adopted SPA Plan. V. CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE OF CONDITIONS If any of the forgoing conditions fail to occur, or if they are, by their terms, to be implemented and maintained over time, and any of such conditions fail to be so implemented and maintained according to the their terms, the City shall have the right to revoke or modify all approvals herein granted, deny or further condition issuance of future building permits, deny, revoke or further condition all certificates of occupancy issued under the authority of approvals herein granted, instituted and prosecute, litigate or compel their compliance or seek damages for their violations. No vested rights are gained by Applicant or any successor in interest by the City approval of this Resolution. VI.INVALIDITY; AUTOMATIC REVOCATION Resolution No. ______ Page 5 It is the intention of the City Council that its adoption of this Resolution is dependent upon enforceability of each and every term provision and condition herein stated; and that in the event that any one or more terms, provisions or conditions are determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, if the City so determines in its sole discretion, this Resolution shall be deemed to be revoked and of no further force or effect ab initio. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council hereby adopts this Resolution approving the Project in accordance with the findings and subject to the conditions contained herein. Presented by:Approved as to form by: _____________________________________________ Gary Halbert, P.E., AICP Glen R. Googins City Manager City Attorney PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, this _____ day of ___________, by the following vote, to-wit: AYES:Council members: NAYS:Council members: ABSENT:Council members: ABSTAIN:Council members: ________________________ Mary Salas, Mayor ATTEST: ________________________ Donna Norris, City Clerk Resolution No. ______ Page 6 RESOLUTION __________ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA CONSIDERING THE ADDENDUM TO EIR 07- 01 AND APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE EASTERN URBAN CENTER SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA (SPA) PLAN AND ASSOCIATED REGULATORY DOCUMENTS RELATING TO MODIFICATIONS IN THE OVERALL BUILDOUT INTENSITY, BUILDING HEIGHTS AND DISTRICT 6 REGULATIONS I.RECITALS A.Project Site WHEREAS, the area of land that is the subject of this Resolution is diagrammatically represented in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated into this Resolution, and commonly known as the Eastern Urban Center (EUC), and for the purpose of general description herein consists of 207 acres located adjacent to and east of SR-125, adjacent to and west of Eastlake Parkway, south of Birch Road and the Otay Ranch Town Center, and north of the future extension of Main Street (Project Site); and B.Project; Application for Discretionary Approvals WHEREAS, a duly verified application was filed with the City of Chula Vista Development Services Department on May 24, 2017 by SLF IV-Millenia, LLC (the “Applicant,” “Owner” and “Developer”) requesting approval of an EUC Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan and Form Based Code (FBC) amendment to: 1) establish a maximum land use intensity of 2,983 residential units and 3.324 million square feet of commercial uses with a low build out of 1,236 units of residential and 1.568 million square feet of non-residential land uses; 2) modify design standards to: a. revise the Minimum Average Height on six lots from five stories to four stories and modify the minimum height in feet in the Regulating Plan, b. establish a “height blending” for Districts 6 and 9, and c. establish deviations for setbacks; and 3) revise the Main Street District (District 6) to reduce the amount of non-residential use to a low of 80,000 and high of 100,000 square feet, further modifying Section 02.04.003 of the District Regulations and Design Guidelines; and C.Prior Discretionary Approvals WHEREAS, development of the Project Site has been the subject matter of various entitlements and agreements, including: 1) a SPA Plan including Public Facilities Financing Plan, Affordable Housing Program and other regulatory documents approved by City Council Resolution No. 2009-224 on September 15, 2009; and 2) Planned Community District Regulations approved by City Council Ordinance No. 3142 on October 6, 2009; Resolution No. ______ Page 2 and 3) SPA Plan Amendment approved by City Council Ordinance No. 3257 and City Council Resolution No. 2013-038 in March 2013; and D.Environmental Determination WHEREAS, the Director of Development Services has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the project was previously covered in adopted Second-Tier Final Environmental Impact Report, EIR 07-01. The Director of Development Services has determined that only minor technical changes or additions to this document are necessary and that none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines calling for the preparation of a subsequent document have occurred; therefore, the Development Services Director has prepared an addendum to EIR 07-01; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the Addendum to EIR 07-01 has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of CEQA, and the Environmental Procedures of the City of Chula Vista; and E. Planning Commission Record of Application WHEREAS, the Director of Development Services set the time and place for a hearing on the Project, and notice of the hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, and its mailing to property owners within 500 feet of the exterior boundary of the Project Site at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held an advertised public hearing on June 13, 2018 on the Project and voted to adopt Resolution No. MPA17-0005 recommending that the City Council amend the EUC SPA Plan; and WHEREAS, the proceedings and all evidence introduced before the Planning Commission at the public hearing on the Project and the minutes and Resolution resulting therefrom, are incorporated into the record of this proceeding; and F. City Council Record of Application WHEREAS, the City Clerk set the time and place for the hearing on the Project application and notices of said hearing, together with its purpose given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, and its mailing to property owners within 500 feet of the exterior boundaries of the Project Site at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, the duly noticed and called public hearing on the Project was held before the Resolution No. ______ Page 3 City Council in the Council Chambers in the City Hall, Chula Vista Civic Center, 276 Fourth Avenue, to receive the recommendations of the Planning Commission, and to hear public testimony with regard to the same. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista hereby finds, determines, and resolves as follows: II.CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH CEQA The City Council finds that, in the exercise of their independent review and judgment, the addendum to EIR 07-01 in the form presented, has been prepared in accordance with requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Review Procedures of the City of Chula Vista and adopts the Addendum to EIR-07-01. III.SPA FINDINGS A. THE SPA PLAN, AS AMENDED, IS IN CONFORMITY WITH THE OTAY RANCH GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND THE CHULA VISTA GENERAL PLAN AND ITS SEVERAL ELEMENTS. The proposed amendments are consistent with the previously approved plans and regulations applicable to surrounding sites and, therefore, the proposed amendments can be planned and zoned in coordination and substantial compatibility with said development B. THE SPA PLAN, AS AMENDED, WILL PROMOTE THE ORDERLY SEQUENTIALIZED DEVELOPMENT OF THE INVOLVED SECTIONAL PLANNING AREAS. The Eastern Urban Center SPA Plan as amended, will maintain existing provisions and requirements to ensure the orderly, phased development of the project prior to or current with the need for said public facilities. C. THE SPA PLAN, AS AMENDED, WILL NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT ADJACENT LAND USE, RESIDENTIAL ENJOYMENT, CIRCULATION, OR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY. The modifications proposed have no change in existing entitlements for residential use and propose a decrease in non-residential use, therefore have no impact on surrounding uses outside of Millenia or on public amenities or infrastructure. IV. APPROVAL OF SPA AMENDMENTS Resolution No. ______ Page 4 Based on the findings above, the City Council approves the EUC SPA Plan as amended and shown in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated into this Resolution subject to the conditions set forth below: 1. Prior to the 30 th day after the accompanying Ordinance becomes effective, the Applicant shall prepare a clean copy of the SPA Plan document by deleting all strike out/underlines and shading. Where the document contains an existing and proposed exhibit, the previous existing exhibit shall be removed and substituted. In addition, the revised text, document format, maps and statistical changes within the EUC SPA and Form Based Code shall be approved by the Director of Development Services for printing prior to incorporating said revisions into the final document. 2. Prior to the 30th day after the accompanying Ordinance becomes effective, the Applicant shall submit to the Development Services Department 10 copies and a CD of the approved amendment to the EUC SPA Plan and Planned Community (PC) District Regulations. 3. Applicant to comply with all the conditions of approval of the Otay Ranch EUC SPA Plan incorporated in Resolution 2009-224 and adopted SPA Plan. V. CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE OF CONDITIONS If any of the forgoing conditions fail to occur, or if they are, by their terms, to be implemented and maintained over time, and any of such conditions fail to be so implemented and maintained according to the their terms, the City shall have the right to revoke or modify all approvals herein granted, deny or further condition issuance of future building permits, deny, revoke or further condition all certificates of occupancy issued under the authority of approvals herein granted, instituted and prosecute, litigate or compel their compliance or seek damages for their violations. No vested rights are gained by Applicant or any successor in interest by the City approval of this Resolution. VI.INVALIDITY; AUTOMATIC REVOCATION It is the intention of the City Council that its adoption of this Resolution is dependent upon enforceability of each and every term provision and condition herein stated; and that in the event that any one or more terms, provisions or conditions are determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, if the City so determines in its sole discretion, this Resolution shall be deemed to be revoked and of no further force or effect ab initio. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council hereby adopts this Resolution approving the Project in accordance with the findings and subject to the conditions contained herein. Resolution No. ______ Page 5 Presented by:Approved as to form by: _____________________________________________ Gary Halbert, P.E., AICP Glen R. Googins City Manager City Attorney PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, this _____ day of ___________, by the following vote, to-wit: AYES:Council members: NAYS:Council members: ABSENT:Council members: ABSTAIN:Council members: ________________________ Mary Salas, Mayor ATTEST: ________________________ Donna Norris, City Clerk ORDINANCE NO.______________ ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE FIRST AMENDMENTTO THE DEVELOPER AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND SLF IV – MILLENIA, LLC I.RECITALS A.Project Site WHEREAS, the area of land that is the subject of this Ordinance is diagrammatically represented in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated into this Ordinance, and commonly known as the Eastern Urban Center (EUC), and for the purpose of general description herein consists of 207 acres located adjacent to and east of SR-125, adjacent to and west of Eastlake Parkway, south of Birch Road and the Otay Ranch Town Center, and north of the future extension of Main Street (“Project Site”); and B.Project; Application for Discretionary Approvals WHEREAS, a duly verified application was filed with the City of Chula Vista Development Services Department on May 24, 2017 by SLF IV-Millenia, LLC (the “Applicant,” “Owner” and “Developer”) requesting approval of an EUC Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan and Form Based Code (FBC) amendment to: 1) establish a maximum land use intensity of 2,983 residential units and 3.324 million square feet of commercial uses with a low build out of 1,236 units of residential and 1.568 million square feet of non-residential land uses; 2) modify design standards to: a. revise the Minimum Average Height on six lots from five stories to four stories and modify the minimum height in feet in the Regulating Plan, b. establish a “height blending” for Districts 6 and 9, and c. establish deviations for setbacks; and 3) revise the Main Street District (District 6) to reduce the amount of non-residential use to a low of 80,000 and high of 100,000 square feet, further modifying Section 02.04.003 of the District Regulations and Design Guidelines; and WHEREAS, due to proposed amendments in overall commercial square footage there are potential impacts to public benefits including job generation and annual net revenue over the cost of providing municipal services, and therefore require modifications to the Developer Agreement between the City of Chula Vista and SLF IV-Millenia, LLC originally entered into September 15, 2009 and recorded on October 27, 2009 as Document No. 2009-0595116 of Official Records in the Office of the San Diego County Recorder; and C.Environmental Determination Ordinance No. __________ Page 2 WHEREAS, The Director of Development Services has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the project was covered in previously adopted Final Second Tier Environmental Impact Report, EIR 07-01. The Director of Development Services has determined that only minor technical changes or additions to this document are necessary and that none of the conditions described in Section 15162 and 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines calling for the preparation of a subsequent document have occurred; therefore, the Director of Development Services has prepared an addendum to the Final Second Tier Environmental Impact Report, EIR 07-01; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the Addendum to EIR 07-01 has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of CEQA, and the Environmental Procedures of the City of Chula Vista; and D.Planning Commission Record of Application WHEREAS, the Director of Development Services set the time and place for a hearing on the Project, and notice of the hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, and its mailing to property owners within 500 feet of the exterior boundary of the Project Site at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held an advertised public hearing onJune 13, 2018 on the Project to adopt Resolution MPA17-0005 recommending that the City Council amend the EUC SPA Plan, FBC, PFFP, FIA and Developer Agreement; and WHEREAS, the proceedings and all evidence introduced before the Planning Commission at the public hearing on the Project and the minutes and Resolution resulting therefrom, are incorporated into the record of this proceeding; and E. City Council Record of Application WHEREAS,the City Clerk set the time and place for the hearing on the Project application and notices of said hearing, together with its purposes given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, and its mailing to property owners within 500 feet of the exterior boundaries of the Project Site at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, the duly noticed and called public hearing on the Project was held before the City Council in the Council Chambers in the City Hall, Chula Vista Civic Center, 276 Fourth Avenue, to receive the recommendations of the Planning Commission, and to hear public testimony with regard to the same. II.NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby find, Ordinance No. __________ Page 3 determine and ordain as follows: A.CONSISTENCY WITH GENERAL PLAN The City Council finds that the proposed amendment to the EUC Planned Community District Regulations and Form Based Code are consistent with the City of Chula Vista General Plan. The General Plan envisions the EUC as a vibrant transit-oriented high intensity urban center serving the City and Otay Ranch master plan community. B.APPROVAL OF PROPOSED AMENDMENTS The City Council hereby approves the amendments to the Eastern Urban Center PlannedCommunity District Regulations and Design Guidelines (Form Based Code) as represented in Exhibit Battached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. III.EFFECTIVE DATE This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force on the thirtieth day from and after its adoption. Presented by Approved as to form by: _____________________________________________ Kelly Broughton Glen R. Googins Director of Development Services City Attorney P a g e | 1 July 10, 2018 File ID: 18-0152 TITLE RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ADOPTING THE AGE-FRIENDLY CHULA VISTA ACTION PLAN RECOMMENDED ACTION Council adopt the resolution. SUMMARY In July 2016, the City of Chula Vista became the 99th jurisdiction in the United States to enter the American Association of Retired Persons’ (AARPs’) Age-Friendly Communities Network through authorization by City Council on May 10, 2016, Resolution No. 2016-068. The Network is an affiliate of the World Health Organization (WHO) Age-Friendly Cities and Communities Program, an international effort launched in 2006 to help cities prepare for rapid population aging and the parallel trend of urbanization. In Chula Vista, we have recognized the need to address public health issues through strategic policy, programs, and partnerships by adopting the Heathy Chula Vista Action Plan in January 2016, but we also recognize that the looming shift in the older adult population could present new and greater public health challenges. Tonight’s action is a culmination of two years of public outreach and data gathering and will adopt the City’s first Age-Friendly Action Plan to identify implementation measures for the next three years to ensure Chula Vista remains a “Livable Community” for all generations. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required. BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION On July 9, 2018, the Joint Task Force for the Age-Friendly Plan, the Commission on Aging and Healthy Chula Vista Advisory Commission, will meet and provide an advisory recommendation to City Council on adopting the Action Plan. A report of their recommendation will be provided at the City Council meeting. P a g e | 2 DISCUSSION The City of Chula Vista has recognized the need to address public health issues through policy, programs,and partnerships for over ten years and has been increasing healthy lifestyles for residents through smoking prohibitions, healthier vending options at city facilities, and access to healthy food and increased physical activity opportunities in underserved areas. On January 5, 2016, the City Council adopted the first “Healthy Chula Vista Action Plan” (“HCVAP”) to formalize strategies to increase overall wellness of residents. While the Healthy Chula Vista efforts focus on many areas of livability, the City recognized a looming shift in the older adult population could present new and greater public health challenges. Specifically, according to SANDAG Population Estimates, the City is expected to see a doubling (from 16% to 32%)of those age 55 and over by 2050 and over a 200% increase of those adults over the age of 85. While the older adult population is expected to increase, the City is seeing a plateauing of adults and children, with negative growth in the college age population. It was for these reasons that Council authorized staff to initiate entering the AARP Age-Friendly Communities Network in May 2016. By looking through the “lens of older adults” the Age-Friendly network provides a platform and five-year process to talk about, set goals, and develop implementation measures to address questions we may not have been previously asking. Planning Phase (Years 1-2) Over the past two years City staff has collaborated internally, with outside agencies both locally and regionally and engaged over 1,500 residents in the community to collect and analyze baseline data vital to the development of the plan. Highlights of the engagement opportunities included: Community Cafes -Listening sessions provided residents with a structured but open forum to discuss topics important to them. Nine Community Cafes were held, many bilingually, at Norman Park Senior Center, Residential Care Facilities, Affordable Housing complexes, Mobilehome Parks, in the Castle Park Promise Neighborhood, and an intergenerational session at High Tech High. AARP Phone Survey - In Fall 2016, AARP commissioned a telephone survey to assess public opinion about age friendly and livable community topics in Chula Vista reaching over 500 residents age 45 and over. Age-Friendly Expert Chat - On January 25, 2018, over ninety (90) stakeholders gathered at City Hall to hear an overview of the planning efforts for the first year and provided breakout groups in each of the domains of livability to develop strategies to address barriers and gaps. Age-Friendly Community Chat (District Roundtables) - During the months of February and March 2018, over fifty (50) participants at community roundtables helped develop strategies for a successful age friendly community in the three or four (time dependent) domains that they felt were most important in their District. Engaging Youth - In addition to holding events at High Tech High, Chula Vista High School hosted several workshops related to mental health and healthy food access over the past two years. To engage younger children, in 2017 Age-Friendly Chula Vista hosted a booth at the annual Day of the Child event and gathered data in the eight domains of livability from a child’s perspective. Just this P a g e | 3 May, over one hundred (100) students participated in the “My Future Community” Drawing Contest from preschool to sixth grade. Eight students, one from each grade, were selected to have their drawing featured in the Age-Friendly Action Plan. The “Chula Vista: Creating an Age-Friendly City, Age-Friendly Action Plan” is a true collaboration with the community and stakeholders that participated in the process. The draft was made available for public review from May 15 - June 15, 2018 and input has been incorporated into the final document before you tonight. Action Plan (End of Year 2) The Age-Friendly process identifies “8 Domains of Livability” that have been found to be the basis for forming more livable and age-friendly communities. The domains closely mirror the seven theme areas in the HCVAP. Through engagement it became clear that there was great overlap between the domains of Respect & Inclusion and Social Participation and that it was necessary to add another domain: Healthy Food Access & Nutrition. The Action Plan is organized by domain to identify a vision- outlining what we aspire to become; what we know - an overview of existing conditions; what we heard - community feedback; and what we will do -steps to respond those high areas of priority by identifying goals and actions steps. A summary of the Chula Vista domain visions, goals and action steps is found below. Outdoor Spaces and Buildings Vision: A city with high-quality buildings and public outdoor spaces that provide safe routes for walking, physical activity, social interaction and recreation in an equitable way throughout the city. Goals & Action Steps: Increase park usage and community ownership. o Create Park Action Groups to address community ownership of parks. o Increase Police interaction with neighborhood groups to promote crime prevention. o Increase nighttime access through pedestrian scale lighting. Transportation Vision: A city where everyone has access to safe, environmentally friendly and sustainable transportation services that are affordable and provide a full range of mobility options to connect residents to critical services, cultural opportunities and each other. Goals & Action Steps: Use educational tool to promote increased alternative transpiration use and obtain community feedback to guide future planning efforts. o Update and distribute the Senior Transportation brochure. o Conduct older adult field trips and create a public service commercial to promote transit use. o Create local business and attraction agreements to provide public transit to events. o Increase older adult participation in the “Bike and Pedestrian Master Plan Update”. Develop ways to move people between events and key amenities. P a g e | 4 o Educate on LYFT and UBER medical insurance reimbursement programs. o Provide shuttle services for community events. Housing Vision: A city that provides affordable, accessible, and supportive housing that fosters healthy and livable neighborhoods for people throughout the age spectrum. Goals & Action Steps: Provide resources and education to promote “Aging in Place” (i.e., continuing to live in one’s own home and community as one ages). o Develop a pocket guide of City services to promote aging in place safely. o Pilot a comprehensive Home Audit program. o Explore implementing the Village Concept. Increase alternative housing options. o Expand Home Sharing services in the South Bay. o Encourage older adults to participate in the “Housing Element Update” process. o Develop a web-based map of senior housing opportunities. Respect, Inclusion and Social Participation Vision: A city that offers opportunities for residents to be included in activities in a meaningful and respectful way, by offering accessible, affordable, and intergenerational activities. Goals & Action Steps: Develop culturally- and age- appropriate programming throughout the city. o Conduct an assessment of intergenerational and senior programming. o Engage Southwestern College and school districts to increase intergenerational opportunities. o Hold workshops on aging. o Create a “This is Chula” theme around respect, economic power, adventure, and vibrancy in aging. Build neighborhood resilience and connectivity. o Create an AARP toolkit for schools and volunteers to partner on school gardens. o Support “Neighbor Day” throughout the City. o Create a toolbox for neighborhood engagement to address social isolation. Healthy Food Access and Nutrition Vision: A city where everyone has equitable access to and knowledge about healthy and nutritious foods. Goals & Action Steps: Increase healthy food access. P a g e | 5 o Develop a Food System Plan for the City, identifying a HUB for food donations and distribution. o Increase knowledge of opportunities to keep food in the chain for human consumption. o Work with partners to create new food distribution points. Promote locally grown food consumption and increase knowledge about nutrition. o Identify new community garden opportunities. o Explore incentives for farmers markets. o Expand nutritional programs around nutrition and dietary needs. Civic Participation and Employment Vision: A city that encourages and empowers residents to work and volunteer for as long as they like and take an active role in their community. Goals & Action Steps: Promote two-way engaged communication between residents and the city. o Develop a community “Ambassador Program” to relay information for community input. o Create a web-based portal for community input into projects and programs. o Support Intergenerational Resident Leadership opportunities. o Develop a faith-based consortium. o Promote and increase use of City based communication tools. Create opportunities for older adults to volunteer or re-enter the job market. o Encourage volunteer opportunities. o Provide older adult job fairs and entrepreneurship opportunities. Communication and Information Vision: A city that enables residents to gain the information they want and need in a variety of formats that provides accessibility to all. Goals & Action Steps: Maintain consistent, widespread, and centralized distribution of information in a culturally appropriate way. o Conduct a public assessment to determine preferred communication sources. o Increase participation of older adults and vulnerable hard to reach population in the “Communications Plan Update”. o Create a pilot for centralized information at community gathering spots. Create a video repository of content and outlets for information for older adults. o Develop video content on issues and events relevant to older adults. o Create access to a “silver channel” for older adults. Health and Community P a g e | 6 Vision: A city that promotes a thriving, healthy community by promoting healthy behavior and access to resources and services throughout the age spectrum. Goals & Action Steps: Address inequity in emergency services in South Bay through education on preventive care, chronic disease management, centralized resources, and patient centered care and advocacy. o Centralize resource referrals and educate community. o Support alternate points of care for urgent and preventative visits. o Promote “family medicine” model to increase communication between specialists. o Educate on health information and services. o Advocacy for regional equity in emergency services. Develop behavioral health and dementia friendly practices and awareness throughout South Bay. o Promotion of mental health trainings in the South Bay. o Trainings and workshops for dementia friendly practices. o Increase knowledge of resources for behavioral health services. o Increase support groups for dementia and mental health caregivers. Implementation and Evaluation (Years 3-5) To ensure the Action Plan strategies are implemented, a Joint Age-Friendly Task Force (“Task Force”) was formed consisting of two existing commissions at the City whose missions are to address issues affecting older adults and public health, the Commission on Aging and Healthy Chula Vista Advisory Commission, respectively. On April 14, 2018,the Task Force met for the first time. These commissions will meet annually to review the overall implementation of the plan and as needed for specific goal and action advancement. In addition to the Task Force, the City is entering an Memorandum of Understanding with San Diego State University’s Social Policy Institute to partner on implementing action steps within the plan. The partnership will work with other community stakeholders and seek grant opportunities to help implement and evaluate strategies within the plan. DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT Staff has reviewed the decision contemplated by this action and has determined that it is not site-specific and consequently, the 500-foot rule found in California Code of Regulations Title 2, section 18702.2(a)(11), is not applicable to this decision for purposes of determining a disqualifying real property-related financial conflict of interest under the Political Reform Act (Cal. Gov't Code § 87100, et seq.). Staff is not independently aware, and has not been informed by any City Council member, of any other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter. LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS The City’s Strategic Plan has five major goals: Operational Excellence, Economic Vitality, Healthy Community, Strong and Secure Neighborhoods and a Connected Community. This item supports Section 3.1.1 - Implement policies and programs that support a healthy community. P a g e | 7 CURRENT-YEAR FISCAL IMPACT Staff costs associated with the preparation of this staff report and for the Age-Friendly Action Plan development are offset by grant funds through the San Diego Foundation. ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT The implementation of the Age-Friendly Action Plan and Healthy Chula Vista Action Plan and the associated work have been historically directed by grant funding. Staff is actively seeking opportunities through a partnership with San Diego State University to expand and accelerate the implementation stage. ATTACHMENTS 1. Chula Vista: Creating an Age-Friendly City, Age-Friendly Action Plan Staff Contact: Stacey Kurz, Senior Project Coordinator, Development Services Department Chula Vista:Creating anAge-Friendly City DRAFT July 2018 AGE-FRIENDLY ACTION PLAN Prepared by the City of Chula Vista Age-Friendly Team A G E -F R I E N D L Y A C T I O N P L A N This page is intentionally left blank E X E C U T I V E S U M M A R Y -A G E -F R I E N D L Y A C T I O N P L A N i Executive Summary Chula Vista’s Age-Friendly Journey In July 2016 the City of Chula Vista became the 99th jurisdiction in the United States to enter the American Association of Retired Persons’ (AARP’s) Age-Friendly Communities Network through authorization by City Council on May 10, 2016, Resolution No. 2016-068. While the City has been engaged in public health policy, programs and partnerships through the Healthy Chula Vista Initiative, the City recognized a looming shift in the older adult population could present new and greater public health challenges. Specifically, the City is expected to see a doubling (from 16% to 32%) of those age 55 and over by 2050 and over a 200% increase of those adults over the age of 85. While the older adult population is expected to increase, the City is seeing a plateauing of adults and children, with negative growth in the college-age population. The five-year process of the Age-Friendly effort provided the structure to allow discussion, analysis and the platform to begin looking at the City’s livability through a ‘lens of age’. Planning The first two years have provided the opportunity to directly engage over 1,500 individuals in the Age-Friendly efforts and reach thousands more, planting the seed to look at age as a consideration in their daily work and interactions. Youth, teens, college students, working adults, families and older adults that live, work, play and pray throughout the City of Chula Vista were all engaged in the process. Residents and stakeholders guided the development of the Age-Friendly Action Plan Process Chula Vista Mayor Mary Casillas Salas Accepts Age- Friendly Network Entrance Certificate with Residents World Health Organization (‘WHO’) and AARP Age-Friendly Communities Process E X E C U T I V E S U M M A R Y -A G E -F R I E N D L Y A C T I O N P L A N ii plan by identifying strengths, gaps and opportunities in eight ‘Domains of Livability’ that were identified as being critical to making the city even more livable for all ages. Identification of a vision for each domain led to development of goals and action steps and are summarized below. Action Plan Goals and Action Steps Outdoor Spaces and Buildings Vision: A city with high-quality buildings and public outdoor spaces that provide safe routes for walking, physical activity, social interaction and recreation in an equitable way throughout the city. Goals & Action Steps: • Increase park usage and community ownership. ▪ Create Park Action Groups to address community ownership of parks. ▪ Increase Police interaction with neighborhood groups to promote crime prevention. ▪ Increase nighttime access through pedestrian scale lighting. Transportation Vision: A city where everyone has access to safe, environmentally friendly and sustainable transportation services that are affordable and provide a full range of mobility options to connect residents to critical services, cultural opportunities and each other. Goals & Action Steps: • Use educational tool to promote increased alternative transpiration use and obtain community feedback to guide future planning efforts. ▪ Update and distribute the Senior Transportation brochure. ▪ Conduct older adult field trips and create a public service commercial to promote transit use. ▪ Create local business and attraction agreements to provide public transit to events. ▪ Increase older adult participation in the “Bike and Pedestrian Master Plan Update”. • Develop ways to move people between events and key amenities. ▪ Educate on LYFT and UBER medical insurance reimbursement programs. E X E C U T I V E S U M M A R Y -A G E -F R I E N D L Y A C T I O N P L A N iii ▪ Provide shuttle services for community events. Housing Vision: A city that provides affordable, accessible, and supportive housing that fosters healthy and livable neighborhoods for people throughout the age spectrum. Goals & Action Steps: • Provide resources and education to promote “Aging in Place” (i.e., continuing to live in one’s own home and community as one ages). ▪ Develop a pocket guide of City services to promote aging in place safely. ▪ Pilot a comprehensive Home Audit program. ▪ Explore implementing the Village Concept. • Increase alternative housing options. ▪ Expand Home Sharing services in the South Bay. ▪ Encourage older adults to participate in the “Housing Element Update” process. ▪ Develop a web-based map of senior housing opportunities. Respect, Inclusion and Social Participation Vision: A city that offers opportunities for residents to be included in activities in a meaningful and respectful way, by offering accessible, affordable, and intergenerational activities. Goals & Action Steps: • Develop culturally- and age- appropriate programming throughout the city. ▪ Conduct an assessment of intergenerational and senior programming. ▪ Engage Southwestern College and school districts to increase intergenerational opportunities. ▪ Hold workshops on aging. ▪ Create a “This is Chula” theme around respect, economic power, adventure, and vibrancy in aging. • Build neighborhood resilience and connectivity. ▪ Create an AARP toolkit for schools and volunteers to partner on school gardens. ▪ Support “Neighbor Day” throughout the City. ▪ Create a toolbox for neighborhood engagement to address social isolation. Healthy Food Access and Nutrition Vision: A city where everyone has equitable access to and knowledge about healthy and nutritious foods. Goals & Action Steps: • Increase healthy food access. ▪ Develop a Food System Plan for the City, identifying a HUB for food donations and distribution. ▪ Increase knowledge of opportunities to keep food in the chain for human consumption. ▪ Work with partners to create new food distribution points. E X E C U T I V E S U M M A R Y -A G E -F R I E N D L Y A C T I O N P L A N iv • Promote locally grown food consumption and increase knowledge about nutrition. ▪ Identify new community garden opportunities. ▪ Explore incentives for farmers markets. ▪ Expand nutritional programs around nutrition and dietary needs. Civic Participation and Employment Vision: A city that encourages and empowers residents to work and volunteer for as long as they like and take an active role in their community. Goals & Action Steps: • Promote two-way engaged communication between residents and the city. ▪ Develop a community “Ambassador Program” to relay information for community input. ▪ Create a web-based portal for community input into projects and programs. ▪ Support Intergenerational Resident Leadership opportunities. ▪ Develop a faith-based consortium. • Promote and increase use of City based communication tools. ▪ Create opportunities for older adults to volunteer or re-enter the job market. ▪ Encourage volunteer opportunities. ▪ Provide older adult job fairs and entrepreneurship opportunities. Communication and Information Vision: A city that enables residents to gain the information they want and need in a variety of formats that provides accessibility to all. Goals & Action Steps: • Maintain consistent, widespread, and centralized distribution of information in a culturally appropriate way. ▪ Conduct a public assessment to determine preferred communication sources. ▪ Increase participation of older adults and vulnerable hard to reach population in the “Communications Plan Update”. ▪ Create a pilot for centralized information at community gathering spots. • Create a video repository of content and outlets for information for older adults. ▪ Develop video content on issues and events relevant to older adults. ▪ Create access to a “silver channel” for older adults. Health and Community Vision: A city that promotes a thriving, healthy community by promoting healthy behavior and access to resources and services throughout the age spectrum. Goals & Action Steps: • Address inequity in emergency services in South Bay through education on preventive care, chronic disease management, centralized resources, and patient centered care and advocacy. E X E C U T I V E S U M M A R Y -A G E -F R I E N D L Y A C T I O N P L A N v ▪ Centralize resource referrals and educate community. ▪ Support alternate points of care for urgent and preventative visits. ▪ Promote “family medicine” model to increase communication between specialists. ▪ Educate on health information and services. ▪ Advocacy for regional equity in emergency services. • Develop behavioral health and dementia friendly practices and awareness throughout South Bay. ▪ Promotion of mental health trainings in the South Bay. ▪ Trainings and workshops for dementia friendly practices. ▪ Increase knowledge of resources for behavioral health services. ▪ Increase support groups for dementia and mental health caregivers. Next Steps Implementation of the Chula Vista Age-Friendly Action Plan will be guided by the Joint Age- Friendly Task Force comprised of the Commission on Aging and Healthy Chula Vista Advisory Commission over the next three years. To learn how you can actively participate, visit chulavistaca.gov/agefriendly. A G E -F R I E N D L Y A C T I O N P L A N Table of Contents Community Profile ................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction to the Plan ....................................................................................................................... 2 Chula Vista’s Age-Friendly Journey ............................................................................................... 2 Plan Development ................................................................................................................................. 4 Community Involvement .................................................................................................................. 4 Public Review ................................................................................................................................... 8 Plan Oversight .................................................................................................................................. 9 Early Accomplishments .................................................................................................................. 10 Action Plan ........................................................................................................................................... 11 Domains of Livability ....................................................................................................................... 11 Action Plan Organization ................................................................................................................ 11 Outdoor Spaces and Buildings ................................................................................................. 12 Transportation ............................................................................................................................ 15 Housing ....................................................................................................................................... 18 Respect, Inclusion & Social Participation ................................................................................. 21 Healthy Food Access & Nutrition ............................................................................................. 24 Civic Participation and Employment ........................................................................................ 27 Communication and Information .............................................................................................. 30 Health and Community ............................................................................................................. 33 Next Steps ............................................................................................................................................ 36 Implementation ............................................................................................................................... 36 Appendix I - Goals & Objectives Appendix II - Acknowledgements Appendix III - References A G E -F R I E N D L Y A C T I O N P L A N 1 Community Profile The City of Chula Vista is located in Southern California in one of the richest cultural, economic and environmentally diverse zones in the United States. Located just 7 miles south of downtown San Diego and 7 miles north of the Mexican border, it is the second-largest City in San Diego County with roughly 41,000 people over the age of 50; and a total population of 267,503 residents as of January 1, 2018.1,2 Chula Vista means “beautiful view” and has more than 52 square miles of coastal landscape, canyons, rolling hills, mountains, quality parks, and miles of trails. The City is a leader in conservation and renewable energy, provides outstanding public schools, and has been named one of the safest and happiest cities in the country. 3 Great year-round weather, with a 72°F - 55°F average daily temperature in a mild Mediterranean climate attracts runners, hikers, cyclists, bird watchers, concert goers and outdoors enthusiasts from the bay to lakes. 4 Attractions along the City’s Bayfront include the Sweetwater Marsh National Wildlife Refuge, Living Coast Discovery Center, Chula Vista Marina & Yacht Club, and Bayshore Bikeway. In the eastern portion of the city, Aquatica Water Park, the Chula Vista Elite Athlete Center (formerly a U.S. Olympic Training Center) and the City’s MattressFirm Amphitheatre provide destinations in addition to hundreds of miles of hiking and cycling trails. 5 Established neighborhoods, cultural diversity, contemporary communities, start-up firms, corporations and a historic downtown all contribute to Chula Vista’s attraction for both families and businesses. To learn more about Chula Vista visit www.explorechulavista.com. Ethnic Diversity in Chula Vista ESRI (2017) A G E -F R I E N D L Y A C T I O N P L A N 2 Introduction to the Plan As a result of changing demographics and concerns about the readiness of communities to serve the growing population of older adults (one-in-five individuals is anticipated to be 65+ across the country by 2030), the World Health Organization (WHO) and American Association of Retired Persons (AARP) have partnered to create a Network of Age-Friendly Communities across the nation.6 But, what does it mean to be an Age-Friendly Community? The WHO says, “An Age-Friendly world enables people of all ages to actively participate in community activities and treats everyone with respect, regardless of their age. It is a place that makes it easy for older people to stay connected to people that are important to them. And it helps people stay healthy and active even at the oldest ages and provides appropriate support to those who can no longer look after themselves.”7 Acceptance into the Age-Friendly Communities network means a community's elected leadership is committed to actively work toward making their town, city or county a great place for people of all ages. Chula Vista’s Age-Friendly Journey The City of Chula Vista has recognized the need to address public health issues through policy, programs, and partnerships for over ten years and has been increasing healthy lifestyles for residents through smoking prohibitions, healthier vending options at city facilities, and access to healthy food and increased physical activity opportunities in underserved areas. In 2013, the City Council adopted a Strategic Plan which included five key goals, one of which being “Healthy Community” and on January 5, 2016, the City Council adopted the first ‘Healthy Chula Vista Action Plan’ (“HCVAP”) to formalize strategies through policy, programs, and partnership to increase overall wellness of residents. The HCVAP identifies seven areas of focus, which closely mirror the ‘Age-Friendly Domains of Livability’: Engagement, Land Use, Transportation, Environmental Quality, Healthy Food Access, Physical Activity and Health Care & Prevention. While the Healthy Chula Vista efforts focus on many areas of livability, the City recognized a looming shift in the older adult population could present new and greater public health challenges and voters within the City were identifying senior needs as a high priority. Voter Priorities Community Service Research Report, True North Research (February 2014) A G E -F R I E N D L Y A C T I O N P L A N 3 Specifically, the City is expected to see a doubling (from 16% to 32%) of those age 55 and over by 2050 and over a 200% increase of those adults over the age of 85. While the older adult population is expected to increase, the City is seeing a plateauing of adults and children, with negative growth in the college-age population.8 These population trends present new questions that have not been focused on in detail, such as: • How does the city attract and retain young talent? • What do neighborhoods look like to entice young families to live there? • How can the City assist older adults to age in place, have access to services when needed and stay engaged? By looking through the ‘lens of older adults’ the Age-Friendly network provides a platform and process to talk about, set goals and develop implementation measures to address these types of questions. Through a partnership with the San Diego Foundation and AARP, the City of Chula Vista began the journey to answer these questions and many more in July 2016, when Chula Vista committed to entering that network and developing a plan to make Chula Vista even more livable throughout residents’ lives. Growth in Population Age through 2050 (SANDAG) Chula Vista Mayor Mary Casillas Salas Accepts Age- Friendly Network Entrance Certificate with Residents A G E -F R I E N D L Y A C T I O N P L A N 4 Plan Development The City of Chula Vista’s goal through the Age-Friendly effort is to create an inclusive environment where all city staff, community organizations, service providers, and the greater community think about issues surrounding the livability of our neighborhoods and city by looking at daily life through a ‘lens of age’. To do this the City created a robust outreach plan to engage the community in all generations of the age spectrum in order to provide a baseline assessment of the existing state of each of the Age-Friendly domains and a summary of the strengths, challenges and gaps in each. This process culminated in Winter 2018 in community development of prioritized ways to address these issues, our Age-Friendly goals and actionable objectives, as fully detailed in Appendix I. Community Involvement Over the past two years City staff has collaborated internally, with outside agencies both locally and regionally and engaged the community (reference Acknowledgments in Appendix II) to collect and analyze baseline data vital to the development of this plan using quantitative data and qualitative information. The quantitative data sources used to establish a baseline (existing condition) are highlighted throughout the Action Plan under the appropriate domains and referenced in Appendix III. In addition, each domain in the Action Plan provides a summary of the qualitative data and community needs identified by stakeholders and residents. A summary of the tools and process used to engage over 1,500 members of the Chula Vista community are detailed below. Community Survey In Fall 2016 AARP commissioned a telephone survey to assess public opinion about Age- Friendly and livable community topics in Chula Vista, following the WHO 8 Domains of Livability. The survey sample consisted of older adults age 45 and over and resulted in 503 completed interviews from people throughout the city.9 Community Cafes Listening sessions, marketed as Community Cafés, were held from July 2016 through March 2017 to provide Chula Vista residents with a structured but open forum to discuss topics important to them. The City reached populations that have not been actively engaged, such as primarily Spanish speaking and older adults by conducting the sessions at places where residents naturally gather allowing a more natural environment which led to more productive discussions around the issues that matter to the community. Participants at the Castle Park Community Café conducted in Spanish A G E -F R I E N D L Y A C T I O N P L A N 5 In total nine (9) Community Cafés were conducted with over 150 participants, most of these Cafés centered around the concerns of older adults at locations including residential care facilities, affordable housing complexes, mobile home parks, the Norman Park Senior Center and a school library. Assistance from community-based organizations and holding sessions in conjunction with city commissions (Commission on Veteran Affairs, Commission on Aging, Healthy Chula Vista Advisory Commission, Cultural Arts Commission, Sustainability Commission and Mobile home Rent Review Commission) also encouraged community involvement. In addition, one session was held in conjunction with the County of San Diego’s Age-Friendly efforts in the Castle Park neighborhood. But, the goal was to get input from people across the age spectrum, not just older adults. Therefore, City staff conducted a listening session at a local high school and solicited input from high school students and their families throughout the process. The session inspired high school students to think about what makes their community livable and discussing what might keep them in their community sparked a stronger sense of belonging and interest in older adults. During these conversations staff asked participants questions pertaining to the eight (8) domains of livability. Through these conversations the City found two additional areas of relevance within the community: food insecurity and safety. Age-Friendly Expert Chat On January 25, 2018 over ninety (90) stakeholders gathered in the City of Chula Vista Council Chambers. Stakeholders included, but not limited to, city staff, community-based organizations, transportation experts, health care providers, housing providers, high school students and residents. This outreach was organized to present an overview of the planning efforts for the first year of the Age-Friendly effort, including a presentation on data and the types of goals that could be developed through the Age-Friendly effort. Participants at the Seniors on Broadway Community Café Participants at the Norman Park Senior Center Community Café A G E -F R I E N D L Y A C T I O N P L A N 6 The purpose of the event was to gather input on how as a community we could all make contributions to improve neighborhood livability for people throughout the age spectrum in each of the Chula Vista Domains of Livability. Age-Friendly Community Chat (Community Roundtables) The Age-Friendly Team conducted four community roundtables, one in each Council District during the months of February and March 2018. With over fifty (50) participants, the community roundtables helped collaborate with residents to develop strategies for a successful Age-Friendly community in the three or four (time-dependent) domains that they felt were most important in their District, as follows: • District 1 – Northeast: Health & Community, Outdoor Spaces and Buildings; Social Participation, Respect & Inclusion; and Transportation. • District 2 – Northwest: Health & Community, Outdoor Spaces and Expert Chat participants and facilitator Mark Fenton Transportation break out group in Districts 1 and 3 Community Chat participants in Districts 1 and 3 A G E -F R I E N D L Y A C T I O N P L A N 7 Buildings, Social Participation, Respect and Inclusion. • District 3 – Southeast: Civic Participation & Employment; Social Participation, Respect & Inclusion; and Transportation. • District 4 – Southwest: Healthy Food; Outdoor Spaces and Buildings; Social Participation, Respect & Inclusion; and Transportation. All roundtables followed a general structure to understand the strengths they felt existed within their District, current issues and what could be done to improve those issue. Participants were encouraged to share, ask questions, and speak out their ideas, challenges, and solutions. Combined with the information gathered during the Expert Chat, staff was able to understand and develop goals to meet community needs in each Domain of Livability. Engaging Youth In an effort to link older adults with youth the Age-Friendly team made efforts to find opportunities to engage youth in the Age-Friendly discussion and process. Day of the Child 2017 In April 2017 staff attended the Day of the Child at Memorial Park. Over 120 children and their families stopped at the Healthy Chula Vista & Age-Friendly booth. Children participated in an interactive game surrounding the 8 Domains of Livability by throwing a beanbag onto a board with the domains and then answering a question to receive a jump rope or flying disc. Questions ranged from whom they communicate with the most to how they get to school each day. “My Future Community” Drawing Contest The My “Future Community” drawing contest was an effort created to engage Chula Vista’s youth through the artistic medium of drawing and to introduce them to Age-Friendly concepts. In a period of four (4) months, over 100 submissions from Pre-K to 6th-grade students participated, challenging them to think about what their community might look like in each of the 8 Domains of Livability. A panel consisting of commissioners from the City’s Commission on Aging, Cultural Arts Commission, Healthy Chula Vista Advisory Commission, along with city staff selected a drawing that best represented each domain. Artists were rewarded for their creativity and participation through City Council recognition on May 1, 2018 and received tickets to the Living Coast Discovery Center and Sky Zone trampoline park. The winner’s drawings are featured as covers to each domain within the Action Plan. Brainstorming Results A G E -F R I E N D L Y A C T I O N P L A N 8 Other Engagement Opportunities In addition to the Age-Friendly engagement opportunities listed above, staff participated at various community events over the two-year planning period to promote the concept of Age-Friendly and Livable Communities while garnering information from residents about assets and challenges residents face as they age in our community, reaching hundreds. City staff held several forums on issues that became relevant and important throughout the process including educational workshops through the Healthy Chula Vista Initiative covering topics such as food insecurity, urban agriculture, food waste, mobile home property management training for senior issues and resources, mental health and suicide prevention training and community resilience. Information on these workshops can be found at www.chulavistaca.gov/healthycv. Public Review A draft of the Action Plan was released to the public on May 15, 2018. A press release was sent out and the plan was made available for download at www.chulavistaca.gov/agefriendly. Hard copies were made available for public view at three different branches of the Chula Vista Public Library System as well as the City's Norman Park Senior Center and City Hall. Notice of the Students & families accept certificates and prizes from City Council Participants of the Applied Suicide Intervention Skills (ASIST) Training A G E -F R I E N D L Y A C T I O N P L A N 9 availability of the plan was also emailed to over 300 stakeholders and residents that participated in the plan development. Special requests for those who had barriers to access the plan were handled by Healthy & Age- Friendly Chula Vista staff. The public comment period closed on June 15, 2018. All comments and suggestions were addressed and, where appropriate, changes were incorporated into the final version of the Action Plan. The final Action Plan went to the Joint Task Force of the Healthy Chula Vista Commission and Commission on Aging on July 9, 2018 and was presented to City Council on July 10, 2018. Plan Oversight The City of Chula Vista has many residents who volunteer their time and expertise to a variety of boards and commissions. These residents advise Council and city staff about issues impacting specific population groups, stay up to date on current trends and topics, and provide forums for residents to express concerns, and find resolutions to specific issues. In determining the most sustainable and effective means to administer the Age-Friendly Action Plan two existing commissions that were active in the outreach process for the development of the plan included: • Healthy Chula Vista Advisory Commission (‘HCVAC’) was formed in April 2016 as an implementation measure of the Healthy Chula Vista Action Plan (‘HCVAP’). The commission consists of nine members: five experts in the focus areas of the HCVAP and four residents that represent each of the City Council Districts. Working with Healthy Chula Vista Initiative staff from the Development Services Department, the commission oversees implementation of over 60 strategies within the HCVAP that address public health issues and overall well-being of residents through policy and programs to improve the City’s physical and social environments, promote awareness and access to services, and build community partnerships. • Commission on Aging (‘COA’) was formed to advise city staff and Council on matters affecting older residents of the city. The commission consists of seven members who are representative of the total racial, religious, ethnic and social spectrum of senior citizens. Members take steps to develop a mutual understanding and respect between seniors and the balance of the community, review existing programs and recommend modifications, and provide a forum where older citizens may voice their concerns and suggestions. The COA works with the Community Services Department Recreation staff to develop programming for older adults throughout the city and at the Norman Park Senior Center. In January 2018 both commissions voted to serve as the ‘Age-Friendly Joint Task Force’, as a way of keeping the Age-Friendly initiative on track. On April 14, 2018 the Commission on Aging and Healthy Chula Vista Advisory Commission met for the first time. These commissions will meet annually to review the overall implementation of the plan and as needed for specific goal and action advancement. They are expected to meet again in June 2018 to provide advisory recommendations on the adoption of the plan to City Council. A G E -F R I E N D L Y A C T I O N P L A N 10 Early Accomplishments Several community-based groups have begun to strengthen our community by looking through a ‘lens of age’ with neighborhood-based efforts, including: • Neighbor Day (Social Isolation) – In May 2017 South Bay Community Services’ Promise Neighborhood Resident Leadership (“RLA”) Academy graduates started an annual event (held the second Saturday in May) to bring neighbors together in the Castle Park neighborhood. The event begins with a pancake breakfast and craft area to create two flowers to take to a neighbor you have not met before. The neighbor keeps the first flower and gives the second flower to a neighbor they do not know. • Senior Prom (Respect & Social Participation) – High Tech High Chula Vista’s 10th-grade students from the Faces of Change project worked for three months with St. Paul’s Plaza, a residential care facility to develop intergenerational programming for residents, including a picnic with a neighboring preschool. The three months concluded in March 2018 with a prom thrown by students for the “seniors” living at the Plaza. • Intergenerational Resident Leadership Academy (Respect & Inclusion) – In Fall 2017 the first Intergenerational RLA was held in collaboration with the Chula Vista Community Collaborative, AARP and Chula Vista High School. Ten students and three community members went through a ten-week course learning leadership skills and developing a community-based project to address food waste at the high school. An hour-long assembly was developed to educate fellow students about waste and proper trash disposal. • We Are Chula Vista (Respect) – In collaboration with City Cultural Arts, Healthy Chula Vista began an oral history video project in 2018 to provide a toolkit for residents to interview older adults. Videos will be showcased through a mobile video kiosk at various locations in the city. • Healthy Habits for a Lifetime (Health & Community) – In July 2018 San Ysidro Health and Healthy Chula Vista will collaborate on a billboard about developing healthy habits as children to live a healthier life into adulthood. The billboard is in a primarily Hispanic area and will be displayed in Spanish. These early accomplishments are a sample directly impacted by our Age-Friendly Journey, but Chula Vista and the South Bay Region of San Diego County have some of the most dedicated social service agencies and community members, we know so much more will come! Neighbors meeting during annual Neighbor Day Employees participate in We Are CV A G E -F R I E N D L Y A C T I O N P L A N 11 Action Plan Domains of Livability Over the course of the year and a half of community and stakeholder engagement it became clear that there was great overlap between the domains of Respect & Inclusion and Social Participation. Being inclusive and participating became virtually synonymous during outreach efforts, as one cannot participate without being included. Thus, the Chula Vista Action Plan has combined these two domains. Additionally, in conversations with residents and internally with city staff it became necessary to add another domain: Healthy Food Access & Nutrition. Residents and stakeholders expressed concerns over the lack of accessible healthy food that was affordable and quality in certain areas of the City and the nutritional needs of older adults often going unmet. In the process of developing this plan staff engaged in various activities that shed light on this issue as a way of raising awareness and effecting change. The issue of safety also continued to come up in domain discussions and has been weaved throughout the plan. Therefore, the Chula Vista Age-Friendly Domains are: • Outdoor Spaces and Buildings • Transportation • Housing • Respect, Inclusion and Social Participation • Healthy Food Access and Nutrition • Civic Participation and Employment • Communication and Information • Health and Community According to the Age-Friendly Livability Index, Chula Vista currently scores 52 out of 100, slightly above the nation’s average score of 50. Scoring lowest in Housing and Engagement, and highest in Health and Outdoor Space and Buildings.10 Action Plan Organization The City of Chula Vista Action Plan is organized by domain to identify a vision - outlining what we aspire to become; what we know - an overview of existing conditions; what we heard - community feedback; and what we will do - steps to respond to those areas of high priority by identifying goals and actions steps. A table summarizing the needs, goals, objectives, and tools needed to accomplish them is found in Appendix I. Outdoor Spaces& Buildings AGE-FRIENDLY ACTION PLAN 2nd Grade “My picture of Chula Vista in the Future includes my school, Rosebank Elementary which I call the "Sky School". I included a rainbow so that everyone can feel welcomed to this place. I drew the "Sky School" as a big skyscraper building because learning is THAT important to me.” Frances Soto Rosebank Elementary A G E -F R I E N D L Y A C T I O N P L A N 13 Vision A city with high-quality buildings and public outdoor spaces that provide safe routes for walking, physical activity, social interaction and recreation in an equitable way throughout the city. What we know Interacting with nature delivers measurable benefits to residents in addition to physical activity opportunities. Having urban green space helps provide environmental benefits by canceling out urban heat, neutralizing greenhouse gas emissions, and decreasing storm water. Chula Vista provides nine recreation centers (including the Norman Park Senior Center), two aquatic facilities, and 56 parks for residents to enjoy, with more parks being added every year as our population continues to grow.11 Approximately 53 percent of residents over the age of 64 live within a ten-minute walk of a public park.12 In addition to City facilities, the YMCA provides opportunities for recreation at the Eastlake and South Bay locations and Southwestern Community College opened a Wellness and Aquatic Center in 2018. Since the late 1980’s most residential growth has occurred in eastern Chula Vista where master-planned communities have been built on previous ranchlands and vacant lands. Community and regional parks have been created in these areas as developments occurred, however, future population growth will require additional parklands throughout the city; presenting a greater challenge in urbanizing western Chula Vista to secure parkland and provide equitable access to physical activity opportunities. In addition to parkland, the Chula Vista Greenbelt is a system of 28 miles of multi-use and rural paths that will circumference the City when completed.13 At the southern border of the City and a part of the Greenbelt system is Otay Valley Regional Park. This system will reinforce the natural character of the community and integrates unique historic and cultural resources, open spaces areas, creeks, and trails. Resident Proximity to City Public Parks - Trust for Public Land (2017) A G E -F R I E N D L Y A C T I O N P L A N 14 What we heard Through community outreach and collection of data, the following themes and issues were identified. Actions suggested to address these issues included activating parks through community groups, community gardens, and increased opportunities to interact with police. What we will do Through the Age-Friendly initiative, we hope to address identified gaps, allowing residents of Chula Vista to continue safely using parks, trails, and outdoor spaces as they age. Additionally, we hope these action items will give residents who are currently unable to use outdoor spaces better access to meaningful experiences with the natural world. Goal 1.1 Increase park usage and community ownership. Actions to Address A. Create at least two (2) Park Action Groups (PAGs) to address community ownership of parks and organize programs that increase the community’s presence (e.g., Adopt-A-Park, cleanups, events, etc.). B. Increase police interaction with Homeowners Association (HOAs), schools, Resident Leadership Academies (RLAs), Ambassadors/ Promotores, and others to promote crime prevention programs (e.g., Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED), Neighborhood Watch Program, etc.). C. Encourage night time use of parks and physical activity in residential areas by exploring pedestrian scale lighting and other alternatives in at least two (2) neighborhoods. •Lack of visible police presence in public spaces •Perceived safety concern due to homeless •Limited lighting on sidewalks Safety •Park bathrooms are in desrepair or not available •Broken sidewalks are a hazard •Dog clean up stations for cleaner walkways Maintenance Transportation AGE-FRIENDLY ACTION PLAN 1st Grade "Transportation is important to communities growth. It allows people to go for one place to another like work, buying groceries and to enjoy the many activities in the communities." Nathan Sevilla Rosebank Elementary A G E -F R I E N D L Y A C T I O N P L A N 16 Vision A city where everyone has access to safe, environmentally friendly and sustainable transportation services that are affordable and provide a full range of mobility options to connect residents to critical services, cultural opportunities and each other. What we know Over 87 percent of residents over the age of 45 drive themselves and many older adults struggle when it’s time to turn over the keys and find alternative modes of transportation to assist getting to appointments and social events.14 The Chula Vista Police Department found the top five causes of traffic collisions in those over the age of 55 are: (1) speeding; (2) not stopping at red lights; (3) not using signals; (4) not yielding for oncoming traffic; and (5) collisions that take place in private parking lots. In addition, an increase in pedestrians and bicyclists over the age of 55 that have been injured by vehicle- related collisions has been seen since 2013.15 With older adults staying active longer than previous generations, public transit will play a key role in maintaining their active lifestyle, once they are unable to drive. The Metropolitan Transit System (MTS) provides transit services in Chula Vista currently maintaining nine (9) bus routes, 585 bus stops and three (3) trolley stations, provides a 24-hour automated transit information and an operating-assisted trip planning service.16 The quality of pedestrian infrastructure is also an important element of a community’s overall quality of life and livability. Repairing and maintaining neighborhood streets became one of the City’s highest priorities in November 2017 when the Measure P Tax was approved by voters for infrastructure improvements.17 A comprehensive inventory of the entire sidewalk system was conducted which will help prioritize future projects and the City is starting the process to update the Bike and Pedestrian Master Plan, including looking at major arterials for the potential of separated bike lanes. Currently the City maintains 137.05 miles of bike infrastructure through a variety of bike routes, lanes and paths.18 The linkage between health and walking as we age is greatly valued as seen through the Chula Vista Walking for Fitness group which utilizes peer coaches to promote overall well-being through organized weekly walks. Pedestrian & Bicycle Related Vehicle Collisions with Older Adults (55+) - Chula Vista Police Department ARJIS (2017) A G E -F R I E N D L Y A C T I O N P L A N 17 What we heard Through community outreach and collection of data, the following themes and issues were identified. Actions suggested to address these issues included coordination with other agencies that have shuttles or buses, implementing complete street policies to account for all modes of transportation during street projects, educate older adults to reduce stigma and lack of knowledge about transit, and creating more visible safe routes. What we will do Through the Age-Friendly initiative, we hope to address identified gaps, through educating residents about alternative forms of transportation and providing increased mobility options to connect residents to the greater community. Goal 2.1 Use educational tools to promote increased alternative transportation use and obtain community feedback to guide future planning efforts. Actions to Address A. Update and disseminate the senior transportation brochure to at least 500 residents and provide a web-based version. B. Develop a public service commercial and/or tutorial video to promote transit use featuring one (1) field trip for up to twenty (20) older adults to a cultural arts experience in the downtown San Diego area. C. Assess the feasibility of the use of incentives for increased public transit use through local business & attraction agreements for at least four (4) events. D. Increase participation (among residents of all ages) in the Bike & Pedestrian Master Plan Update to address: “first mile, last mile” issues; bike sharing promotion & regulations; resting areas between transit stops; suggested routes to schools implementation; and education around traffic signal synchronization for safety. Goal 2.2 Develop new ways to move people between events and key amenities. Actions to Address A. Assess feasibility of a formal LYFT or UBER senior transportation program for medical appointments, which may include research and education on health insurance reimbursement and provision of at least two (2) trainings to older adults on using such services. B. Explore opportunities and organize shuttle services for at least two (2) community events. •Crosswalk timers too short for some residents •Additional mid-block crosswalks in heavy pedestrian areas •Clearly separated bike lanes from traffic lanes •Enforce traffic speeds on major corridors Safety •Community events can be hard to attend by transit •More resting areas in between transit stops for walkers •Need easier transit navigation (e.g., routes, maps) •Infrequent transit stops and routes in East Chula Vista Access Housing AGE-FRIENDLY ACTION PLAN Kindergarten “My community of the future is a place full of sunshine, beautiful owers, and friendly neighbors. Everyone who visits is greeted with smiles and warm hugs. I love my community!” Kara Santos Wolf Canyon Elementary A G E -F R I E N D L Y A C T I O N P L A N 19 Vision A city that provides affordable, accessible and supportive housing that fosters healthy and livable neighborhoods for people throughout the age spectrum. What we know With over 79,000 housing units in the city, residents have a variety of different living options.19 However, as with much of Southern California, high housing costs often prevent individuals and families from meeting all basic needs. As of 2018 the average rent for a 2-bedroom apartment in Chula Vista was $1,715 and median single-family household price was $559,000.20,21 The City has an inclusionary requirement for new development which has provided many of the restricted affordable housing units in the city (2,316 as of 2018).22 Demand for these units often causes waitlists of several years as does the Section 8 program administered by the County of San Diego which issued 2,585 vouchers in Chula Vista in 2017, with nearly one third to residents over the age of 62.23 In addition, the city provides rent control services for existing residents within mobile home and trailer parks, which house many older adults and lower income families where the average space rent for a new mobile home in 2017 was $780.24 Chula Vista also offers a first-time program to help assist home purchases and a rehabilitation program that has assisted over 1,200 households since its inception in the 1970’s.25 In recent years many new residential care facilities have been built, resulting in 1,532 elder care and 762 adult residential units.26 However, rates often range from $4,000 to $6,000 per month and are often not attainable for resident, making it difficult for residents to stay in the community when they need a higher level of care that cannot be provided within their home or by caregivers. Nearly 60 percent of surveyed residents indicate that they would like to stay in their current residence and never move.27 Some stay in our community without adequate access to resources or assistance as represented by the Fire Department’s reported calls for service related to falls in 2016 of 3.7 times per day.28 Housing Types in Chula Vista -SANDAG Current Estimates (2017) Fall Related Calls for Service - Chula Vista Fire Department A G E -F R I E N D L Y A C T I O N P L A N 20 What we heard Through community outreach and collection of data, the following themes and issues were identified. Actions suggested to address these issues included increasing types of housing with lower price points through zoning and incentives, as well as identifying programs to assist residents stay in place longer. What we will do Through the Age-Friendly initiative, we hope to address identified gaps, allowing residents of Chula Vista the ability to stay here in suitable housing that meets their needs throughout their lifetime. Goal 3.1 Provide resources and education to promote “Aging in Place” (i.e., continuing to live in one’s own home and community as one ages). Actions to Address A. Develop & disseminate a pocket guide to at least 500 households that feature existing programs such as You Are Not Alone (YANA), Vacation Check, and Neighborhood Watch Programs in order to promote safety while aging in home. B. Pilot a comprehensive Home Audit Program in at least fifty (50) homes to address crime prevention, fall prevention, conservation measures, social isolation, and health & safety issues. C. Explore the Village Concept in at least one (1) mobile home community through presentations in at least three (3) parks. Goal 3.2 Increase alternative housing options. Actions to Address A. Expand Home Sharing services to the South Bay and develop a pilot program to match seniors and students making at least five (5) matches. B. Encourage older adults to be part of the Housing Element Update process to address senior housing issues and opportunities (e.g. increase densities, tiny houses, accessory dwelling units, universal design) through at least two (2) presentations to Commission on Aging and Veteran Affairs. C. Develop and promote a web-based City map of senior housing opportunities and senior facilities. •Ability to modify home to suit the needs of physically challenged •Perceived lack of safety in neighborhoods keeps people inside •Need to require universal design for all future homes Aging in Place •Finding affordable quality housing options throughout Chula Vista •Access for lower income residents to residential careAffordability Respect, Inclusion& Social Participation AGE-FRIENDLY ACTION PLAN 6th grade “I drew this because my future community is going to be a kind peaceful place. e community citizens would be making peace, and will help the less fortunate. It will have people who are hard working and sweet to all.” Colton Sturgess Feaster Charter School A G E -F R I E N D L Y A C T I O N P L A N 22 Vision A city that offers opportunities for residents to be included in activities in a meaningful and respectful way, by offering accessible, affordable and intergenerational activities. What we know Residents of all ages want to feel respected and valued, especially in the community they call home. Inclusion in society and social participation is often regarded as an important principle of quality of life in advancing years. Norman Park Senior Center, which has become the City’s center for senior programing including educational courses, health programs, exercise, hobbies, dancing groups and special events reported 79,360 served in fiscal year 2016-17.29 In addition to Norman Park, limited classes for older adults is provided at other recreation facilities in the city. Surveyed residents ranked activities geared specifically towards older adults as “poor” and also indicated local schools do not often involve older adults in events and activities.30 During the initial year of the Age-Friendly efforts staff heard from older adults at residential care facilities that they had opportunities to participate in on-site activities but felt disconnected from the larger community. While older adults living in affordable housing found it difficult to engage with their neighbors and did not know where to find information on social events. Further, they often felt intimidated and/or had physical barriers to participating. The City of Chula Vista works closely with County Aging and Independent Services on intergenerational activities such as the “Intergenerational Games”, an annual one-day event bringing third graders and older adults together for a day of physical activity and sharing to build respect between generations. The Games, which began in Chula Vista are now conducted at various locations throughout the County. Other agencies provide intergenerational opportunities within Chula Vista such as “Oasis” whom pairs an older adult with an elementary school student for weekly reading tutoring for an entire year, they reported 10 schools, 25 tutors and 77 students impacted in Chula Vista in 2018.31 Participants at the Chula Vista IG Games Exercise class at Norman Park Senior Center A G E -F R I E N D L Y A C T I O N P L A N 23 What we heard Through community outreach and collection of data, the following themes and issues were identified. Actions suggested to address these issues included greater partnerships with schools to create intergenerational sharing opportunities, utilizing faith-based communities to identify vulnerable, creating a variety of programming for older adults with cultural sensitivity and enhancing community connectivity. What we will do Through the Age-Friendly initiative, we hope to address identified gaps, engaging Chula Vista residents of all ages to encourage inclusive participation. Goal 4.1 Develop culturally and age-appropriate programming throughout the city. Actions to Address A. Conduct an assessment of intergenerational and senior programming and event needs/desires to identify and pilot at least three (3) new programs and promote programming equity throughout City. B. Engage Southwestern College and school districts in increasing and sustaining at least two (2) new intergenerational programs. C. Hold a minimum of five (5) workshops on aging (e.g. retirement planning, elder respect). D. Create an older adult related theme for the “THIS is Chula” campaign and other identified communication efforts surrounding respect, economic power, adventure and vibrancy in aging. Goal 4.2 Build neighborhood resilience and connectivity. Actions to Address A. Create an AARP toolkit for school and volunteer MOUs to assist with school garden maintenance and pilot in at least three (3) schools. B. Support Promise Neighborhood “Neighbor Day” annual efforts to expand citywide. C. Create a toolbox for neighborhood engagement to identify socially isolated persons and engage them in neighborhood activities through a pilot project in at least two (2) neighborhoods. •Lack of programs and opportunities for residents of all ages •Not enough variety of day vs. night activities •Insufficient active and passive gathering places •Need for affordable programming & access throughout city Equity •Culturally geared programming for all residents •Lack of knowledge about different generationsSensitivity •Finding vulnerable and isolated residents within community •Access to programming & events to reduce social isolation •Lack of community connection to schools Social Isolation Healthy Food Access& Nutrition AGE-FRIENDLY ACTION PLAN Pre-K “is is a picture of fruits and me!” Abigail Perez KinderCare A G E -F R I E N D L Y A C T I O N P L A N 25 Vision A city where everyone has equitable access to and knowledge about healthy and nutritious foods. What we know According to the San Diego Hunger Coalition and based on income over 17 percent of Chula Vista residents are likely to self-report being food insecure (not having access at all times to enough food for an active, healthy life).32 Proper nutrition is critical throughout one’s lifetime, but as we age we are at a higher health risk for adverse health risks.33 During the course of the Age-Friendly outreach the topic of food insecurity and food waste became a large topic of interest. The City conducted educational workshops addressing these issues to learn more and receive additional feedback specific to this added domain, including: • South Bay Hunger Relief Forum I, focused on food distribution efforts and discussion about best practices in serving the most vulnerable populations. • South Bay Hunger Relief Forum II, explored the topic of food waste diversion with a screening of the documentary Just Eat It; over 200 students at Chula Vista High School (CVHS) attended. • South Bay Hunger Relief Forum III, breakout roundtable discussions emphasizing sustainable food systems. As a way of combating food insecurity and preventing food deserts, the City of Chula Vista has updated their community garden policy to allow additional public spaces to be used to cultivate fruits and vegetables. Additionally, the City is in process of adopting an Urban Agriculture Incentive Zone to allow a tax break for eligible private property owners if they agree to use their vacant property for agricultural purposes for a minimum of five years. The City’s Office of Adverse Health Outcomes of Food Insecure Older Americans - Spotlight on Senior Health: National Foundation to End Senior Hunger and feeding America (March 2014) Chula Vista High School students moderate a panel on food waste diversion A G E -F R I E N D L Y A C T I O N P L A N 26 Sustainability is also working to educate on food donations in efforts to divert organic waste from our landfill. What we heard Through community outreach and collection of data, the following themes and issues were identified. Actions suggested to address these issues included better coordination to retain food in the south bay, more opportunities to educate everyone in the food chain, and ensuring people are aware of available resources. What we will do Through the Age-Friendly initiative, we hope to address identified gaps, providing access to healthy food for Chula Vista residents and addressing nutritional needs. Goal 5.1 Increase healthy food access. Actions to Address A. Develop a Food System Plan for the City with an identified HUB for donations and distribution in the South Bay. B. Increase food kept for human consumption through education of policy/regulations (i.e. share tables, donations, etc.) C. Work with partners to create at least two (2) new food distribution points and explore mobile opportunities. Goal 5.2 Promote locally grown food consumption and increase knowledge about nutrition. Actions to Address A. Identify new community garden opportunities and champions, creating at least five (5) new community gardens. B. Explore incentives for farmer markets to create at least one (1) new market. C. Expand class offerings around generational nutrition, dietary needs, cultural cooking and ensure existing classes provide healthy offerings. •Inability to meet basic food needs •Stigma around asking for food assistance •Policies preventing donation (e.g. school share tables) Hunger •Raise awareness on effective and appropriate nutrition •Unhealthy foods are often easier to access Nutrition •Lack of knowledge on donation laws •Residents lack knowledge of available resources •Provide programming for healthy cultural cooking Education AGE-FRIENDLY ACTION PLAN Civic Participation andEmployment 4th Grade "When I grow up I want to be a chef. My drawing shows how to make soup for homeless people and homeless families. is is part science and part chef.“ Jenessa Rincon Feaster Charter School A G E -F R I E N D L Y A C T I O N P L A N 28 Vision A city that encourages and empowers residents to work and volunteer for as long as they like and take an active role in their community. What we know Civic participation includes individual acts, such as voting (92,186 voters registered in 2015); as well as two-way engagement with the greater community and institutions, such as local government and schools.34 Residents and stakeholders can sign up for email notification of new projects, events and other related city activities as detailed in the Communication and Information domain. Policy surrounding new development also requires notification via mail for residents within a certain radius of the project area and sometimes provide community meetings for input. The City also encourages residents to stay engaged through a variety of volunteer opportunities such as: sitting on one of the 23 resident boards and commissions; at facilities like Norman Park Senior Center, Libraries or the Animal Care Facility; and/or with first responders through the Senior Volunteer Patrol (SVP), Citizen Adversity Support Team (CAST) and Community Emergency Response Team (CERT).35 Local businesses and nonprofits also encourage and often heavily depend on volunteer hours like the Living Coast Discovery Center, who logged 26,743 volunteer hours in fiscal year 2016-2017. 36 As life expectancy increases often the need to work longer also increases. Surveyed residents ranked job training opportunities for old adults and adaptable jobs that meet the need of people with disabilities as “poor” in Chula Vista.37 In most respects, the population of older adults is distributed evenly between the original historic area of Chula Vista west of Interstate 805 and the more recently built areas in the eastern portions of the city. Except income, where older adults in eastern Chula Vista nearly double the income of western Chula Vista, which may also contribute to future employment trends.38 Employment of Older Adults 55+ - American Community Survey (ACS) 1-year estimates (2015) A G E -F R I E N D L Y A C T I O N P L A N 29 What we heard Through community outreach and collection of data, the following themes and issues were identified. Actions suggested to address these issues included promotion of resident leadership academies and train the trainer models, opportunities for employers to learn benefits of older adults in the workforce, linking employers and older adults, and engaging residents at the community level. What we will do Through the Age-Friendly initiative, we hope to address identified gaps, allowing residents of Chula Vista to continue to work in the community as desired and access volunteer opportunities. Goal 6.1 Promote two way engaged communication between residents and the city. Actions to Address A. Develop a community “Ambassador Program” through the “Promotoras model” to relay information on projects and opportunities for community input. B. Create a web-based portal for community input into projects and programs. C. Support Resident Leadership Opportunities to further community engagement particularly intergenerational and conduct at least three (3) academies. D. Develop a faith-based consortium of at least five (5) organizations to relay information on projects and opportunities for community input. E. Promote and Increase use of City-based communication technology such as ACT. Goal 6.2 Create opportunities for older adults to volunteer or re-enter the job market. Actions to Address A. Utilize the City’s Volgistics database to encourage volunteerism through new opportunities (i.e. school gardens, Innovation Station). B. Provide at least one (1) class on entrepreneurship opportunities for older adults and one (1) volunteer / job fair. •Residents unsure of what it means to be civically involved •Older adults need assistance to re-enter job market •Need to promote the benefits of older adults in workplace Education •Barriers to transportation & using transit •Want to be financially compensated for their volunteer time •Unsure where to find opportunities for volunteering & jobs •Volunteers want to see tangible results of volunteering Access •Communities woud like to be informed early about projects •Residents feel intimidated by application process •There needs to be easier and multiple ways to share input Feedback Communication and Information AGE-FRIENDLY ACTION PLAN 5th Grade “My drawing shows how I think communication and information would look like in the city in the future. It describes dierent modes of devices to communicate and display information such as a hologram, electric billboard, ying delivery car, oating personal computer device, talking computer device, and upgraded cell phones.” Aubree Antoine Wolf Canyon Elementary A G E -F R I E N D L Y A C T I O N P L A N 31 Vision A city that enables residents to gain the information they want and need in a variety of formats that provides access to all. What we know The City of Chula Vista operates three public library facilities and residents in the Bonita area have access to a fourth location through the County library system. All branches have computers available for public use with free internet access, thousands of books and daily educational programing for library visitors. In the 2016-17 fiscal year, there were 857,475 visitations to the Chula Vista libraries.39 Forty-seven percent (47%) of residents surveyed indicated that they felt they have excellent access to free computers with internet in public places.40 As mentioned another hub for older adult activity in the city is Norman Park Senior Center whom publishes its own facility Newsletter to inform about programming and special events that will be taking place throughout the city for older adults. In addition to brick and mortar hubs for information dissemination, the City of Chula Vista has used several different technological mediums to keep its constituents informed, including: • Social media such as Facebook (7,708 Followers as of January 2018) and Instagram (1,988 followers). • Text and email-based notification through NIXLE. • Smartphone applications such as Next Door (over 20,000 residents) and the San Diego County Emergency notification. • City website that includes a city calendar (that highlights community events/programs accessible by outside agencies to post events), information about new development and construction, and services offered by various departments, all with options for email notification. • Printed publications such as Chula Vista-based Star News and La Prensa (Spanish publication) and Our Hometown magazine and Ella (Spanish publication) and the San Diego Union-Tribune at a regional level. • Media releases to local radio and television.41 Residents with limited mobility reported negative ratings to information availability in a recent survey and 31 percent of residents indicated that information was not clearly displayed with large lettering.42 Chula Vista Civic Center Library Heritage Museum A G E -F R I E N D L Y A C T I O N P L A N 32 What we heard Through community outreach and collection of data, the following themes and issues were identified. Actions identified to address these issues included ensuring information is being provided in linguistically and culturally appropriate formats, providing a variety of ways to supply information and educate residents on options to access. What we will do Through the Age-Friendly initiative, we hope to address identified gaps, allowing residents of Chula Vista to remain informed. Goal 7.1 Maintain consistent, widespread and centralized distribution of information in a culturally appropriate way. Actions to Address A. Conduct a public information assessment to determine existing communication channels and preferred or new sources of community information. B. Increase participation by older adults and vulnerable populations (e.g., low income, socially isolated, Spanish speaking) in the Communications Plan update to understand and address communication to hard-to-reach populations and people without digital access. C. Develop or designate centralized information sharing (e.g. community events) at pilot community gathering places (e.g. kiosks in grocery stores, schools, hospitals, clinics, libraries). Goal 7.2 Create a video repository of content and outlets for information for older adults. Actions to Address A. Develop video content on issues and information relevant to older adults, including a calendar of community events. B. Work with local access cable, REACH loop at Norman Park Senior Center and others to develop a “silver channel” and You-Tube Channel for older adults. •Use a variety of infomration outlets •Place information in places where people "are"Increasing Reach •Residents often face technology barriers •Materials appropriate to language and culture •Ensure visual and hearing sensitivity Accessibility Health and Community ! AGE-FRIENDLY ACTION PLAN 3rd grade “On the left there is a nurse she pressed a button and a hologram appeared. If you press a photo it makes that item in a 3D printer. For example she pressed a photo of a syringe and that appeared. ere’s also Ipads for entertainment. On the right there's a oating bed that turns on and o and on top of the bed it shows the girls DNA. ere's also more color.” Marian Nabo Hedenkamp A G E -F R I E N D L Y A C T I O N P L A N 34 Vision A city that promotes a thriving, healthy community by promoting healthy behavior and access to resources and services throughout the age spectrum. What we know 2-1-1 San Diego provides free access to community resource referrals for residents throughout the County. In fiscal year 2015-16, 2-1-1 reported 2,052 calls and 4,243 referrals in a variety of areas with basic needs far outweighing all other categories.43 When it comes to health outcomes there is great difference between east and west Chula Vista. Based on San Diego County HHSA data, West Chula Vista has the highest rate of COPD, anxiety and asthma-related hospitalization emergency discharges, and the lowest life expectancy at 76.8 years, relative to other low-income communities in the County. 44 These outcomes can be lowered through healthy behaviors influenced by policy, systems and environmental change which is the goal of the Healthy Chula Vista Initiative. In addition, other preventable chronic conditions such as Type 2 Diabetes (10 percent of adult population in eastern Chula Vista and up to 17 percent in western Chula Vista) can be prevented or managed to allow residents to lower risk of emergency conditions and live a higher quality of life. Finally, in 2018 Alzheimer’s disease was listed in the top five causes of early death in the South Bay Region of San Diego County for the first time with XX diagnosed persons in Chula Vista in 2017. 45 With the increasing number of older adults and without a cure for this condition, increasing resources such as the San Diego County Sheriff’s Department Take Me Home Program (whom reported 136 residents in Chula Vista registered in 2018) and other caregiving respite resources like the Chula Vista Glenner Center Town Square adult day care services will be in higher demand.46 Other mental health issues continue to be of concern in Chula Vista and culminated in two community discussions during the Age-Friendly process as follows: • Resilience: The Biology of Stress and the Science of Hope movie screening and resource fair where students, teachers, service providers, parents and community members were invited to Chula Vista High School to learn about the impact of Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) and their impacts on lifelong health. An additional screening and panel discussion were held due to popularity. Resources Requested by Older Adults (55+) - 2-1-1 San Diego Client Profile, Chula Vista (2015-2016) A G E -F R I E N D L Y A C T I O N P L A N 35 What we heard Through community outreach and collection of data, the following themes and issues were identified. Actions identified to address these issues included education of the health care system, using community health workers (promotoras) to educate at the neighborhood level, focus on senior services, improving access to resources in a centralized place and improving preventive care. What we will do Through the Age-Friendly initiative, we hope to address identified gaps, allowing residents of Chula Vista to easily access preventive and critical care services. Goal 8.1 Address inequity in emergency services in South Bay through education on preventive care, chronic disease management, centralized resources, patient- centered care and advocacy. Actions to Address A. Identify central resource service provider (e.g., 211) and develop promotional campaign to encourage a one-stop shop for resource and increase older adults (55+) referrals by 10%. B. Support alternative points of care (e.g., Kaiser at Target, San Ysidro Health at Northgate, Sharp at CVS ‘Minute Clinic’) and create at least one (1) new alternative. C. Promote “family medicine model” patient-centered care where specialist communicate throughout health care system. D. Develop a campaign to educate community on health information (including MediCal and MediCare) and services in Chula Vista, in an effort to divert non-emergency use from the ER. E. Advocate for additional hospital resources for emergency services. Goal 8.2 Develop behavioral health and dementia friendly practices and awareness. Actions to Address A. Promote behavioral health training for practitioners, businesses and residents by conducting at least four (4) related trainings. B. Host at least four (4) dementia friendly trainings and workshops for businesses, families, CBOs and/or health care. C. Increase knowledge and use of “Take Me Home” program by 10% and other resources for dementia by expanding education at point of diagnosis and critical points of contact. D. Create two (2) community-based support groups for mental health. •Create one stop for community resources •Provide warm hand-offs •Lack of knowledge of 2-1-1 San Diego Centralized Resources •Distinguish prevention vs. emergency care •Reduce wait times for specialized services •Knowledge of medical services & insurance •Residents perceive inequity in access Emergency Services •Reduce stigma surrounding mental health •Substance abuse & recreational drugs •Knoweldge & resources for dementia Mental Health A G E -F R I E N D L Y A C T I O N P L A N 36 Next Steps Implementation The City and community partners will work over the next three years to implement t he goals and objectives outlined in the Age-Friendly Chula Vista Action Plan with oversight from the Joint Task Force (Commission on Aging and Healthy Chula Vista Advisory Commission). The Joint Task Force will meet annually to review progress and ensure the Action Plan is on track. Through a continued partnership with the San Diego Foundation and San Diego State University the City will work with community partners to dive deeper into reviewing data and needs within particular neighborhoods as pilot programs are established and deployed. The City is confident that the implementation measures identified in the Action Plan will not only be accomplished but inspire the community to look through a ‘lens of age’ when interacting with the public and making decision on policies, programs and community activities to advance Age- Friendly Chula Vista! A G E -F R I E N D L Y A C T I O N P L A N I - 1 Appendix I Goals & Objectives OUTDOOR SPACES & BUILDINGS Identified Need Goal Objectives Lead & Supporting Agencies Objective Completion Resources Available Resources Needed Indicators to measure progress Park safety Pedestrian safety relating to crime and visibility concerns Goal 1.1 Increase park usage and community ownership. A. Create at least two (2) Park Action Groups (PAGs) to address community ownership of park and organize programs that increase the community’s presence (e.g., Adopt-A- Park, clean ups, etc.). Healthy CV / City Community Services Faith-Based SBCS / Live Well 2020 City of Chula Vista has prior experience with Adopt- A-Park program- Funding to develop toolkit Interested citizens to volunteer in PAGs • Toolkit on developing PAGs • Rentals for park facilities (Recreation) • # of community events organized by PAGs B. Increase police interaction with Homeowners Association (HOAs), schools, Resident Leadership Academies (RLAs), Ambassadors/ Promotores, and others to promote crime preventive programs (e.g., Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED), Neighborhood Watch Program, etc.). CVPD City Community Services School Districts Begin Fall 2018 - Marketing materials, signage • # of interactions or contact with HOAs, RLAs, Schools, Ambassadors/Promotores, etc. • # new Neighborhood Watch (CVPD) programs • # new CPTED programs A G E -F R I E N D L Y A C T I O N P L A N I - 2 C. Encourage night time use of parks and physical activity in residential areas by exploring pedestrian scale lighting and other alternatives in at least two (2) neighborhoods. Healthy CV City Traffic Engineering 2020 - Funding for outreach, pilot technology & evaluation • Pre & Post Resident Survey on night-time outdoor activity (e.g., activities and frequency of use) • Pre- and Post- observational data on the residents’ night-time activities and frequency of use • Pedestrian scale lighting in at least 2 neighborhoods TRANSPORTATION Identified Need Goal Objectives Lead & Supporting Agencies Objective Completion Resources Available Resources Needed Indicators to measure progress Senior transit passes Reduction in stigma and fear regarding the use of public and alternative transit Decreased social isolation Goal 2.1 Use educational tools to promote increased alternative transportation use and obtain community feedback to guide future planning efforts. A. Update and disseminate the senior transportation brochure to at least 500 residents and provide a web-based version. COA MTS Fall 2019 (dependent on Funding) Existing guide City CIP Program Funds or other funding • Distribution • # of web hits • Service #s B. Develop a public service commercial and/or tutorial video to promote transit use featuring one (1) field trip for up to twenty (20) older adults to a cultural arts experience in the COA / HCVAC SDSU MTS Fall 2019 (dependent on Funding) - Applying for AARP Challenge Grant • Commercial and/or Tutorial Video • Pre & post survey of field trip participants’ perceptions of public transit • # of video watches • # Senior bus passes (MTS) A G E -F R I E N D L Y A C T I O N P L A N I - 3 downtown San Diego area. C. Assess the feasibility of the use of incentives for increased public transit use through local business & attraction agreements for at least four (4) events. Healthy CV / City Economic Development Chamber of Commerce MTS Circulate San Diego Begin 2020 - - • Report that includes findings on the following: • Types or nature of incentives • # of business participating • # of promotional events • Utilization of public transit use D. Increase participation (among residents of all ages) in the Bike & Pedestrian Master Plan Update to address: -“first mile, last mile” issues -bike sharing promotion & regulations -resting areas between transit stops -suggested routes to schools implementation -education around traffic signal synchronization for safety City Traffic Engineering / HCVAC / COA Safety Commission Summer 2019 - - • # of meetings or community forum to discuss the Plan • Participation survey • Inclusion of topics in plan Transit alternatives for events within City of Chula Vista LYFT & UBER #s Goal 2.2 Develop new ways to move people between events and key amenities. A. Assess feasibility of a formal LYFT or UBER senior transportation program for medical appointments, which may include research and education on health COA / HCVAC SANDAG / Live Well Begin 2019 - - • LYFT & UBER ridership • Insurance claims • Pre- and post- participant surveys that captures data on the training as well as the actual program A G E -F R I E N D L Y A C T I O N P L A N I - 4 insurance reimbursement and provision of at least two (2) trainings to older adults on using such services. (effectiveness, satisfaction, etc). B. Explore opportunities and organize shuttle services for at least two (2) community events. Healthy CV / COA/ Cultural Arts Commission School Districts / MTS Renewing Life Residential Care Facilities Fall 2019 Existing transportation resources Funding for transportation service • Assessment of Interest • Utilization of shuttle services / attendance HOUSING Identified Need Goal Objectives Lead & Supporting Agencies Objective Completion Resources Available Resources Needed Indicators to measure progress Desire to age in place Affordable Housing Address fall- related calls for service 3.1 Provide resources and education to promote “Aging in Place” (i.e., continuing to live in one’s own home and community as one ages). A. Develop & disseminate a pocket guide to at least 500 households that feature existing programs such as You Are Not Alone (YANA), Vacation Check, and Neighborhood Watch Programs in order to promote safety while aging in home. Healthy CV / CVPD/CVFD Summer 2019 Existing programs & marketing materials Funding for pocket guide • Distribution • Applicants for services • Neighborhood Watch B. Pilot a comprehensive Home Audit Program in at least fifty (50) homes to address crime Healthy CV / SDSU CVPD / CVFD City Housing / City Office of Sustainability Begin 2019 Existing program staff Funding to create comprehensive pilot • Decrease in Fall-related Calls for Service (CVFD) A G E -F R I E N D L Y A C T I O N P L A N I - 5 prevention, fall prevention, conservation measures, social isolation, and health & safety issues. AARP/Sharp • Decrease in reported thefts, per Crime Data (CVPD) • Increase in # of referrals to programs/activities • Survey of residents on the health, psychosocial, and social changes brought about by the program C. Explore the Village Concept in at least one (1) mobile home community through presentations in at least three (3) parks. County AIS Healthy CV / City Housing Begin 2019 Existing Village models Funding for marketing & pilot • Interest • Launch • Referrals Rental opportunities Student Housing (In)security Intergenerational partnerships between students and older adult population around SWCC Expand housing choices provided 3.2 Increase alternative housing options. A. Expand Home Sharing services to the South Bay and develop a pilot program to match seniors and students making at least five (5) matches. ElderHelp of San Diego SWCC College Estates Begin Fall 2018 Existing Home Share program & base of housing insecure students Funding to market program & create pilot • Outreach awareness • Interest • # of Matches made • Documenting benefits of the services via Survey B. Encourage older adults to be part of the Housing Element Update process to address senior housing issues and opportunities (e.g. increase densities, tiny houses, accessory dwelling units, universal design) through at least City Housing AARP January 2020 - - • Housing Element 2013- 2020 (Housing) A G E -F R I E N D L Y A C T I O N P L A N I - 6 in Choose Well SD two (2) presentations to Commission on Aging and Veteran Affairs. C. Develop and promote a web-based City map of senior housing opportunities and senior facilities. Healthy CV City Housing City GIS/County GIS CARR / Choose Well December 2018 City GIS Services & Choose Well data - • Website hits • Web-based survey on user experience meeting housing needs RESPECT, INCLUSION & SOCIAL PARTICIPATION Identified Need Goal Objectives Lead & Supporting Agencies Objective Completion Resources Available Resources Needed Indicators to measure progress Senior programming surveys Existing classes 4.1 Develop culturally- and age- appropriate programming throughout the city. A. Conduct an assessment of intergenerational and senior programming and event needs/desires to identify and pilot at least three (3) new programs and promote programming equity throughout City. City Recreation SDSU Winter 2019 SDSU Intern Incentives/$ for survey participation Funding for development of 3 programs - • Needs Assessment survey • At least three (3) new programs • Pre & post participant survey B. Engage Southwestern College and school districts in increasing and sustaining at least two (2) new intergenerational programs. City Community Services SWCC / SDSU School District Fall 2019 - -Funding to plan & launch programs • At least two (2) new intergenerational programming classes • Pre & post participant survey C. Hold a minimum of five (5) workshops on aging (e.g., retirement planning, care options, elder respect). City Community Services / Healthy CV City Cultural Arts SWCC / SDSU Up to 2 each implementation year - Funding for events & surveys • Events • Pre & post participant survey of content/info learned A G E -F R I E N D L Y A C T I O N P L A N I - 7 D. Create an older adult related theme for the “THIS is Chula” campaign and other identified communication efforts surrounding respect, economic power, adventure and vibrancy in aging. City Communications / COA / HCVAC Fall 2018 THIS is Chula campaign. - • Consultant tracking of social media likes and consumer feedback Connectivity Neighbor Day AARP Volunteers 4.2 Build neighborhood resilience and connectivity. A. Create an AARP toolkit for school and volunteer MOUs to assist with school garden maintenance and pilot in at least three (3) schools. Southern Caregiver Resource Center / AARP Healthy CV School District Fall 2020 Existing gardens Volunteer base • Interest • Toolkit available in AARP AFC website • # MOUs entered • # of volunteers B. Support Promise Neighborhood “Neighbor Day” annual efforts to expand citywide. SBCS / Healthy CV / COA May 2020 - Funding for marketing materials • Participation at pancake breakfast • Social media C. Create a toolbox for neighborhood engagement to identify socially isolated persons and engage them in neighborhood activities through a pilot project in at least two (2) neighborhoods. City Communications / Healthy CV City Community Services CBOs Faith-based Spring 2021 Promotoras & RLAs Funding to create toolbox & pilot project • Pre & post survey of individuals social integration HEALTHY FOOD ACCESS & NUTRITION Identified Need Goal Objectives Lead & Supporting Agencies Objective Completion Resources Available Resources Needed Indicators to measure progress A G E -F R I E N D L Y A C T I O N P L A N I - 8 Food security (or Address Food Insecurity) Address Uncoordinated distribution points 5.1 Increase healthy food access. A. Develop a Food System Plan for the City with an identified HUB for donations and distribution in the South Bay. Office of Sustainability CHIP / Hunger Coalition Feeding San Diego Spring 2021 SDSU Intern Funding to create plan • Assessment of baseline B. Increase food kept for human consumption through education of policy/regulations (i.e. share tables, donations, etc.) Office of Sustainability CHIP School Districts County Agriculture Hunger Coalition Spring 2019 - -Funding for education/ dissemination of policy/regs • Donations & new distribution C. Work with partners to create at least two (2) new food distribution points and explore mobile opportunities. Office of Sustainability / Healthy CV Feeding San Diego / San Diego Food Bank SBCS / SWCC / PACE Fall 2020 Feeding San Diego - • New points of entry • # of clients One existing community garden Policy changes 5.2 Promote locally grown food consumption and increase knowledge about nutrition. A. Identify new community garden opportunities and champions, creating at least five (5) new community gardens. Healthy CV / City Community Services Office of Sustainability Fall 2020 City Community Garden policy UAIZ Seeds Equipment Expertise • Applications for gardens • # of gardens B. Explore incentives for farmer markets to create at least one (1) new market. Healthy CV / City Community Services / City Economic Development Office of Sustainability Wild Willow / Mosaic Spring 2021 - Pilot funding • # of farmer and community markets C. Expand class offerings around generational nutrition, dietary needs, City Community Services / SDSU Fall 2019 SDSU Intern - • Pre & post survey that measures increase of health classes offered & A G E -F R I E N D L Y A C T I O N P L A N I - 9 cultural cooking and ensure existing classes provide healthy offerings. Sharp/San Ysidro Health/Scripps customer satisfaction & knowledge CIVIC PARTICIPATION & EMPLOYMENT Identified Need Goal Objectives Lead & Supporting Agencies Objective Completion Resources Available Resources Needed Indicators to measure progress Increase early on communication Input on projects Leadership development Knowledge of existing communication outlets 6.1 Promote two-way engaged communication between residents and the city. A. Develop a community “Ambassador Program” through the “Promotoras model” to relay information on projects and opportunities for community input. Healthy CV / City Communications CVCC/SBCS/Scripps ACE/RLAs Fall 2020 - Funding for website development & recruitment & training of Ambassadors • # of Ambassadors B. Create a web-based portal for community input into projects and programs. Healthy CV / City Communications Spring 2021 - - • Website hits • # of comments C. Support Resident Leadership Opportunities to further community engagement particularly intergenerational and conduct at least three (3) academies. SBCS/CVCC AARP CHIP Spring 2021 Trained RLA facilitators Funding for RLAs • # of RLA graduates by age group D. Develop a faith-based consortium of at least five (5) organizations to relay information on projects and opportunities for community input. Healthy CV UCSD Center for Community Health CHIP Live Well Spring 2021 - - • Membership composition • # of meetings • Projects/information relayed between City and Consortium A G E -F R I E N D L Y A C T I O N P L A N I - 10 E. Promote and Increase use of City-based communication technology such as ACT. Public Works City Communications Ongoing Spring 2021 - - • ACT claims # of existing volunteers Benefits of volunteering & older adult employment 6.2 Create opportunities for older adults to volunteer or re-enter the job market. A. Utilize the City’s Volgistics database to encourage volunteerism through new opportunities (i.e. school gardens, Innovation Station). City Human Resources City Recreation Fall 2020 SDSU Intern (GERO students can help) Existing Volgistics database • # of volunteers • Website hits B. Provide at least one (1) class on entrepreneurship opportunities for older adults and one (1) volunteer / job fair. City Community Services / Economic Development Summer 2020 SDSU Intern - • Pre & post survey COMMUNICATION & INFORMATION Identified Need Goal Objectives Lead & Supporting Agencies Objective Completion Resources Available Resources Needed Indicators to measure progress City Social media -Facebook -Instagram -Twitter -Next Door Email subscriptions -Community Connections -City Calendar Utility billing 7.1 Maintain consistent, widespread and centralized distribution of information in a culturally appropriate way. A. Conduct a public information assessment to determine existing communication channels and preferred or new sources of community information. City Communications SCAMP Fall 2018 - Funding for survey • Generate a report on assessment • Social media • Email distribution • # of New outlets B. Increase participation by older adults and vulnerable populations (e.g., low income, socially isolated, Spanish HCVAC / COA / HRC City Communications Summer 2019 - - • Membership participating in the Communication Plan update • New outlets of communication A G E -F R I E N D L Y A C T I O N P L A N I - 11 speaking) in the Communications Plan update to understand and address communication to hard- to-reach populations and people without digital access. C. Develop or designate centralized information sharing (e.g. community events) at pilot community gathering places (e.g. kiosks in grocery stores, schools, hospitals, clinics, libraries). City Communications HCVAC / COA / HRC Fall 2019 - Funding for pilot & kiosks • Deployment • Kiosk touches • Utilization of services advertised/referred by the Info-Sharing Kiosk Address Social isolation 7.2 Create a video repository of content and outlets for information for older adults. A. Develop video content on issues and information relevant to older adults, including a calendar of community events. COA / HCVAC SWCC / SDSU Summer 2020 SDSU Intern Funding for video production • # of Videos produced B. Work with local access cable, REACH loop at Norman Park Senior Center and others to develop a “silver channel” and You-Tube Channel for older adults. COA City Communications Cox Communications SWCC Sharp / Scripps / San Ysidro Health Spring 2021 SDSU Intern / SWCC Volunteers • You-Tube hits • Resource access HEALTH & COMMUNITY Identified Need Goal Objectives Lead & Supporting Agencies Objective Completion Resources Available Resources Needed Indicators to measure progress A G E -F R I E N D L Y A C T I O N P L A N I - 12 ER & admitted bed counts ER visits for non- emergency Wait times for specialized care 8.1 Address inequity in emergency services in South Bay through education on preventive care, chronic disease management, centralized resources, patient-centered care and advocacy. A. Identify central resource service provider and develop promotional campaign to encourage a one-stop shop for resource referrals and increase referrals by 10% to older adults (55+). Healthy CV County AIS/HHSA 2-1-1 San Diego Spring 2021 2-1-1 San Diego Funding for launching the promotional campaign- • Referrals B. Support alternative points of care (e.g. Kaiser at Target, San Ysidro Health at Northgate, Sharp at CVS ‘Minute Clinic’) and create at least one (1) new alternative. HCVAC San Ysidro Health / Kaiser / Sharp / Scripps Spring 2021 - - • Visits to alternative care C. Promote “family medicine model” patient-centered care where specialist communicate throughout health care system. HCVAC Health Care Partners 2-1-1 San Diego County HHSA Winter 2020 - - • New models deployed D. Develop a campaign to educate community on health information (including MediCal and MediCare) and services in Chula Vista, in an effort to divert non- HCVAC County HHSA Sharp AARP Winter 2019 - Funding for marketing material • Distribution • ER visits A G E -F R I E N D L Y A C T I O N P L A N I - 13 emergency use from the ER. E. Advocate for additional hospital resources for emergency services. HCVAC Sharp / Scripps / San Ysidro Health /Family Health Centers Summer 2020 - -Data/report describing the problem/need • Funding for emergency services Take Me Home participation Mental Health classes Alzheimer’s #s & projections 8.2 Develop behavioral health and dementia friendly practices and awareness. A. Promote Mental Health First Aid, suicide prevention and other behavioral health training for practitioners, businesses and residents by conducting at least four (4) related trainings in the south bay. Healthy CV CHIP / NAMI County HHSA SBCS / CVCC School Districts CVPD / CVFD Winter 2021 Suicide Prevention Council / Mental Health First Aid -Coordinator; training rooms; • # of practitioners, business, and residents attended/participated • # of classes • Pre &post survey of content/skills learned B. Host at least four (4) dementia friendly trainings and workshops for businesses, families, CBOs and/or health care in the south bay. Healthy CV Alzheimer’s San Diego/ Alzheimer’s Association County AIS Winter 2021 - Funding for training materials, presenter; coordinator of these trainings. • # of participants • # of classes • Pre & post survey of content/skills learned C. Increase knowledge and use of “Take Me Home” program by 10% and other resources for dementia by expanding education at point of diagnosis and critical points of contact. HCVAC / COA Alzheimer’s San Diego/ Alzheimer’s Association CVPD/CVFD/Sheriff’s Dept. City Community Services SDSU County AIS Spring 2021 - Funding for promotional materials & training • Survey of knowledge of Take Me Home program • Any user experience story • (decreased) Rates of wandering or lost patients A G E -F R I E N D L Y A C T I O N P L A N I - 14 Sharp/Scripps/Kaiser/San Ysidro Health/Family Health Centers D. Create two (2) community-based support groups for mental health. Healthy CV Alzheimer’s Association City Community Services Winter 2020 Alzheimer’s Association Training Community Champions • Groups formed • Number of participants A G E -F R I E N D L Y A C T I O N P L A N II - 1 Appendix II Acknowledg ments Chula Vista Age-Friendly Team acknowledges the following with our thanks for your involvement in the Chula Vista Age-Friendly planning efforts. AARP® Joe Garbanzos, AARP® California, Executive Council Bob Prath, AARP® California, Livable Communities Advisory Team Kimberly Smith, AARP® California, Associate State Director of Aging & Independence Services Commission on Aging Monica Allan Rochelle Carroll Bobby Erdmann Gloria Escalera Mary Johnson (Vice Chair) Pat Mallan (Chair) Jeannine Nash Healthy Chula Vista Advisory Commission Mary Cruz (Chair) More De Murguia Ricardo Jimenez Lucia Martinez Ana Melgoza Diana Milburn Roman Partida-Lopez Lorena Quiroz (Vice Chair) The San Diego Foundation Maritza Maksimow, Manager, Age-Friendly Communities Program San Diego State University School of Social Work Dahlia Fuentes, Ph.D., MSW, MPH, Lecturer, School of Social Work Steve Hornberger, Director, Social Policy Institute, School of Social Work Jong Won Min, Ph.D., MSW, Professor and Associate Director, School of Social Work Healthy Adventures Foundation Wendy Hileman MSW, MPH, President & CEO City of Chula Vista Stacey Kurz, Healthy Chula Vista & Age-Friendly Communities Initiatives A G E -F R I E N D L Y A C T I O N P L A N II - 2 Nicholas Paúl, Age-Friendly Communities Initiatives Tanairi Romano, Age-Friendly Communities Initiatives Mario Sanguinet, Age-Friendly Communities Initiatives Stephanie Oh, Age-Friendly Communities Initiatives Cameron Celeste, Project Coordinator, Office of Sustainability Sandy Chavez, Recreational Supervisor, Community Services Gil Contreras, Principal Recreation Manager, Community Services Melania Culuko, Senior HR Analyst, Human Resource Department Dave DiDonato, Recycling Specialist, Office of Sustainability Patricia Ferman, Principal Landscape Architect, Development Services Department Frances Giaime, Police Sergeant, Chula Vista Police Department Angela Gaines, Police Community Relations Specialist, Chula Vista Police Department Leilani Hines, Housing Manager, Development Services Department Frank Rivera, Principal Civil Engineer, Public Works Anne Steinberger, Marketing & Communication Manager, Communications Department Michael Walker, Senior Planner and Zoning Administrator, Development Services Department Community Organization Representatives Don Ambrose, Del Mar Healthcare Patricia Bartow, Southwestern College Khalisa Bolling, University of California, Active Aging and Community Health (REACH) Judi Bonilla, Advocates for Aging Liliane Choney, ReVision Resources Anya Delacruz, ElderHelp of San Diego Zaneta Encarnacion, Southwestern College Mark Fenton, Tufts University, Friedman School of Nutrition Science & Policy Malia Flood, Southwestern College Julio Garcia, San Diego County Sheriff’s Department Nina Ghatan, San Diego Community Health Improvement Partners (CHIP) Cyndi Gonzalez, South Bay Community Services Kristen Guzman, Retirement Housing Foundation Jennifer Hart, Retirement Housing Foundation Lillian Leopold, Southwestern College Stan Miller, REACH Chula Vista Rachel Morineau, South Bay Community Services Jolyn Parker, San Diego Oasis Martha Ranon, Southern Caregiver Resource Center Ana González Seda, Alzheimer’s Association Christina Selder, CARR Consumer Advocates for RCFE Reform Scott Tarde, Glenner Center Elizabeth A. Terrazas, Alzheimer’s Association Lori Wright, Goldrich Kest A G E -F R I E N D L Y A C T I O N P L A N II - 3 Deanna Yamen, San Ysidro Health County of San Diego Sarah Jackson, Aging & Independence Services Anabel Kuykendall, Aging & Independence Services Chuck Matthews, Aging & Independence Services/North County Regions Jeselle Mclaurin, Aging & Independent Services Lina Nasr, Aging & Independence Services Matthew Parcasio, Aging & Independence Services Kimberly Pettiford, Public Health Services Pam Plimpton, Aging & Independence Services Melina Rivera, Aging & Independent Services Mark Sellers, Public Administrator/Public Guardian/Public Conservator Renee Sherrill, Aging & Independence Services Kristen Smith, Aging & Independence Services Floyd Willis, Aging & Independence Services Marlenne Zavala, Aging & Independent Services Community Members Alexandra Martinez Ana King Angie Willis Anysabel Becerra Ashley Chang Ashley Lanzarotto Aurora Cudal-Rivera Barbara Orozco-Valdivia Bill Schlagel Carlos Rincon Carolyn Scofield Christa Cuison Christine Nabo Clarence Antoine Clayton Huber Craig Clark David Hurt Diana Padilla Edith Johnson EJ Soto Gabriela Abdon Heavan Kim Isabela Clark Isabela Cuerpo-Clark Itzel Esparza Ivanna Martinez Jane Hartman Jasmine Rodriguez Jennifer Rodriguez Jenny Rodriguez Jeziah Alvarez Joanna Estrada Joanne Adamos Jon Milburn Joseph Toro Josiah Sanchez Josie Moya Karinna Topete Kenn Coldasure Kristin Haukom Kristina Calonge Laurel White Leslie Payne Liliane Choney Lisa Viergutz Lupita Roman Lynn Young Madeleine Corbeil Maggi Baker Maitha Plazola Maria A Reed Marilee Ronquillo Marilyn Sevilla Mark Frase Melina Rivera Melissa Doan Melissa Garcia Monique Serna Nayeli Burciaga Nicole Soriano Patty Chavez Paul Crawford Penny Peyton Rebecca Ruiz Richard Pichette Rosanna Bixel Roselle Ellison Rosio Myers Sara Pungust Talia Paul Veronica Partida Yasmin Zahra Shah Rosio Myers Sara Pungust Talia Paul Veronica Partida Yasmin Zahra Shah Yolanda LibsackYudmila Guizar Yumi Richards A G E -F R I E N D L Y A C T I O N P L A N III - 1 Appendix III References 1 City of Chula Vista. [online] Available at: http://www.chulavistaca.gov/residents/about-chula- vista [Accessed 2018] 2 California Department of Finance. (2018). E-1 Population Estimates for Cities, Counties, and the State — January 1, 2017 and 2018. [online] Available at: http://www.dof.ca.gov/Forecasting/Demographics/Estimates/E-1/ 3 City of Chula Vista. [online] Available at: http://www.chulavistaca.gov/residents/about-chula- vista [Accessed 2018] 4 U.S. Climate Data. [online] Available at: https://www.usclimatedata.com/climate/chula- vista/california/united-states/usca0219 [Accessed 2018] 5 City of Chula Vista. [online] Available at: http://www.chulavistaca.gov/residents/about-chula- vista [Accessed 2018] 6 Global Age-friendly Cities: A Guide. (2007) [online] Available at: https://www.aarp.org/content/dam/aarp/home-and-family/livable-communities/2013-12/global- age-friendly-cities-guide-english.pdf 7 World Health Organization. [online] Available at: http://www.who.int/ageing/age-friendly- world/en/ [Accessed 2018]. 8 San Diego Association of Governments Data Surfer, Forecasts. (2018). 9 AARP Research (2016). Livability for All in the City of Chula Vista, CA An Age-Friendly Community Survey of Residents Age 45+. City of Chula Vista: AARP, pp.1-24 10 AARP (2018). AARP Livability Index. Current Location: Chula Vista, San Diego County, CA. [online] Available at: https://livabilityindex.aarp.org/search#Chula+Vista+CA+USA 11 Chulavistaca.gov. (2018). Recreation Department - The Heart of the Neighborhood | City of Chula Vista. [online] Available at: http://www.chulavistaca.gov/departments/recreation 12 Parkscore.tpl.org. (2017). ParkScore. [online] Available at: http://parkscore.tpl.org/city.php?city=Chula%20Vista#sm.0001tk1rk2ueyebtyoe1897uvfka4 13 Chulavistaca.gov. (2013). Chula Vista Greenbelt Master Plan | City of Chula Vista. [online] Available at: http://www.chulavistaca.gov/departments/development-services/planning/chula- vista-greenbelt-master-plan A G E -F R I E N D L Y A C T I O N P L A N III - 2 14 AARP Research (2016). Livability for All in the City of Chula Vista, CA An Age-Friendly Community Survey of Residents Age 45+. City of Chula Vista: AARP, pp.1-24 15 City of Chula Vista Police Department, ARJIS. (2017). 16 Metropolitan Transit System Data. Report to Chula Vista. (2017). 17 Chulavistaca.gov. (2017). Infrastructure, Facilities and Equipment Expenditure Plan. [online] Available at: http://www.chulavistaca.gov/home/showdocument?id=16123 18 City of Chula Vista Traffic Engineering. (2017) 19 U.S Census Bureau (2010). ESRI Demographic and Income Profile; Chula Vista. Census 2010 Summary File 1. Chula Vista: ESRI 20 Apartments.com, Rent Trends, Chula Vista, 2-bedroom (May 2018). [online] https://www.apartments.com/chula-vista-ca/#guide [Accessed 2018] 21 CoreLogic. Thinking about moving to a new neighborhood? Here's how much homes currently cost (April 2, 2018). [online] http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/data-watch/sd-fi-g- corelogic-tableu-20180330-story.html [Accessed 2018] 22 City of Chula Vista Housing – Affordable Housing. (2017). 23 Rental Assistance Report. County of San Diego to City of Chula Vista Housing. (February 6, 2018). 24 City of Chula Vista, Report to the Mobile home Rent Review Commission. (April 19, 2018). 25 City of Chula Vista Housing. Community Housing Improvement Program. (2018). 26 CA Department of Social Services. [online] Available at: http://www.cdss.ca.gov/inforesources/Community-Care-Licensing/Facility-Search-Welcome [Accessed 2017]. 27 AARP Research (2016). Livability for All in the City of Chula Vista, CA An Age-Friendly Community Survey of Residents Age 45+. City of Chula Vista: AARP, pp.1-24 28 City of Chula Vista Fire Department. (2017). 29 City of Chula Vista Recreation Department. (Fiscal year 2016-2017). 30 AARP Research (2016). Livability for All in the City of Chula Vista, CA An Age-Friendly Community Survey of Residents Age 45+. City of Chula Vista: AARP, pp.1-24 31 San Diego Oasis Report. Chula Vista 2018. (January 30, 2018). 32 San Diego Hunger Coalition. (2018). Hunger in San Diego. [online] Available at: https://www.sandiegohungercoalition.org/research/ [Accessed 2018] A G E -F R I E N D L Y A C T I O N P L A N III - 3 33 Feedingamerica.org. (2018). Spotlight On Senior Hunger. [online] Available at: http://www.feedingamerica.org/research/senior-hunger-research/spotlight-on-senior-hunger.pdf [Accessed 2018] 34 San Diego County Registrar of Voters. (2016). 35 City of Chula Vista. [online] Available at: www.chulavistaca.gov/departments/city-clerk/boards- commissions [Accessed 2018] 36 Living Coast Discovery Center, Annual Report. (Fiscal Year 2016-2017). 37 AARP Research (2016). Livability for All in the City of Chula Vista, CA An Age-Friendly Community Survey of Residents Age 45+. City of Chula Vista: AARP, pp.1-24 38 U.S Census Bureau (2010). ESRI Demographic and Income Profile; Chula Vista. Census 2010 Summary File 1. Chula Vista: ESRI 39 City of Chula Vista. City of Chula Vista | Home, www.chulavistaca.gov/departments/Library/ 40 AARP Research (2016). Livability for All in the City of Chula Vista, CA An Age-Friendly Community Survey of Residents Age 45+. City of Chula Vista: AARP, pp.1-24 41 City of Chula Vista Communications. (2017). 42 AARP Research (2016). Livability for All in the City of Chula Vista, CA An Age-Friendly Community Survey of Residents Age 45+. City of Chula Vista: AARP, pp.1-24 43 2-1-1 San Diego. (FY2015-16). 44 San Diego County Health and Human Services Agency. [online] Available at: https://www.sandiegocounty.gov/hhsa/. (2017). 45 San Diego County Health and Human Services Agency. [online] Available at: https://www.sandiegocounty.gov/hhsa/. (2017). 46 San Diego County Sheriff’s Department. Report to Healthy Chula Vista. (March 14, 2018). RESOLUTION NO. __________ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ADOPTING THE AGE-FRIENDLY CHULA VISTA ACTION PLAN. WHEREAS, the World Health Organization (“WHO”) launched an international effort, entitled the Age-Friendly Cities and Communities Program, to help cities prepare for rapid population aging and the parallel trend of urbanization; and WHEREAS, in the United States the American Association of Retired Persons’ (AARPs’) Age-Friendly Communities Network (“Network”) is the affiliate to the WHO program; and WHEREAS, the City Council authorized staff to submit an application to enter the Network on May 10, 2016 by Resolution No. 2016-068; and WHEREAS, in July 2016, the City of Chula Vista became the 99 th jurisdiction in the United States to enter, committing to a five-year process to evaluate, develop an Action Plan and implement Age-Friendly concepts to encourage the livability of the community for all generations; and WHEREAS, over the past two years the City has conducted numerous outreach events and data collection efforts to develop a baseline assessment and create community strategies to address issues of aging in Chula Vista; and WHEREAS, the Action Plan, entitled “Chula Vista: Creating an Age-Friendly City, Age- Friendly Action Plan” is a culmination of these efforts. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, that it does hereby adopt the Age-Friendly Chula Vista Action Plan. Presented by Approved as to form by _________________________________________________________________________ Kelly G. Broughton, FASLA Glen R. Googins Director of Development Services City Attorney May 17, 2018 TO: Mayors, City Managers and City Clerks RE: DESIGNATION OF VOTING DELEGATES AND ALTERNATES League of California Cities Annual Conference – September 12 - 14, Long Beach The League’s 2018 Annual Conference is scheduled for September 12 – 14 in Long Beach. An important part of the Annual Conference is the Annual Business Meeting (during General Assembly), scheduled for 12:30 p.m. on Friday, September 14, at the Long Beach Convention Center. At this meeting, the League membership considers and takes action on resolutions that establish League policy. In order to vote at the Annual Business Meeting, your city council must designate a voting delegate. Your city may also appoint up to two alternate voting delegates, one of whom may vote in the event that the designated voting delegate is unable to serve in that capacity. Please complete the attached Voting Delegate form and return it to the League’s office no later than Friday, August 31, 2018. This will allow us time to establish voting delegate/alternate records prior to the conference. Please note the following procedures are intended to ensure the integrity of the voting process at the Annual Business Meeting.  Action by Council Required. Consistent with League bylaws, a city’s voting delegate and up to two alternates must be designated by the city council. When completing the attached Voting Delegate form, please attach either a copy of the council resolution that reflects the council action taken, or have your city clerk or mayor sign the form affirming that the names provided are those selected by the city council. Please note that designating the voting delegate and alternates must be done by city council action and cannot be accomplished by individual action of the mayor or city manager alone.  Conference Registration Required. The voting delegate and alternates must be registered to attend the conference. They need not register for the entire conference; they may register for Friday only. To register for the conference, please go to our website: www.cacities.org. In order to cast a vote, at least one voter must be present at the 1400 K Street, Suite 400  Sacramento, California 95814 Phone: 916.658.8200 Fax: 916.658.8240 www.cacities.org Council Action Advised by July 31, 2018 Business Meeting and in possession of the voting delegate card. Voting delegates and alternates need to pick up their conference badges before signing in and picking up the voting delegate card at the Voting Delegate Desk. This will enable them to receive the special sticker on their name badges that will admit them into the voting area during the Business Meeting.  Transferring Voting Card to Non-Designated Individuals Not Allowed. The voting delegate card may be transferred freel y between the voting delegate and alternates, but only between the voting delegate and alternates. If the voting delegate and alternates find themselves unable to attend the Business Meeting, they may not transfer the voting card to another city official.  Seating Protocol during General Assembly. At the Business Meeting, individuals with the voting card will sit in a separate area. Admission to this area will be limited to those individuals with a special sticker on their name badge identifying them as a voting delegate or alternate. If the voting delegate and alternates wish to sit together, they must sign in at the Voting Delegate Desk and obtain the special sticker on their badges. The Voting Delegate Desk, located in the conference registration area of the Sacramento Convention Center, will be open at the following times: Wednesday, September 12, 8:00 a.m. – 6:00 p.m.; Thursday, September 13, 7:00 a.m. – 4:00 p.m.; and Friday, September 14, 7:30 a.m.– 11:30 a.m.. The Voting Delegate Desk will also be open at the Business Meeting on Friday, but will be closed during roll calls and voting. The voting procedures that will be used at the conference are attached to this memo. Please share these procedures and this memo with your council and especially with the individuals that your council designates as your city’s voting delegate and alternates. Once again, thank you for completing the voting delegate and alternate form and returning it to the League’s office by Friday, August 31. If you have questions, please call Kayla Curry at (916) 658-8254. Attachments:  Annual Conference Voting Procedures  Voting Delegate/Alternate Form Annual Conference Voting Procedures 1. One City One Vote. Each member city has a right to cast one vote on matters pertaining to League policy. 2. Designating a City Voting Representative. Prior to the Annual Conference, each city council may designate a voting delegate and up to two alternates; these individuals are identified on the Voting Delegate Form provided to the League Credentials Committee. 3. Registering with the Credentials Committee. The voting delegate, or alternates, may pick up the city's voting card at the Voting Delegate Desk in the conference registration area. Voting delegates and alternates must sign in at the Voting Delegate Desk. Here they will receive a special sticker on their name badge and thus be admitted to the voting area at the Business Meeting. 4. Signing Initiated Resolution Petitions. Only those individuals who are voting delegates (or alternates), and who have picked up their city’s voting card by providing a signature to the Credentials Committee at the Voting Delegate Desk, may sign petitions to initiate a resolution. 5. Voting. To cast the city's vote, a city official must have in his or her possession the city's voting card and be registered with the Credentials Committee. The voting card may be transferred freely between the voting delegate and alternates, but may not be transferred to another city official who is neither a voting delegate or alternate. 6. Voting Area at Business Meeting. At the Business Meeting, individuals with a voting card will sit in a designated area. Admission will be limited to those individuals with a special sticker on their name badge identifying them as a voting delegate or alternate. 7. Resolving Disputes. In case of dispute, the Credentials Committee will determine the validity of signatures on petitioned resolutions and the right of a city official to vote at the Business Meeting. 2018 ANNUAL CONFERENCE VOTING DELEGATE/ALTERNATE FORM Please complete this form and return it to the League office by Friday, August 31, 2018. Forms not sent by this deadline may be submitted to the Voting Delegate Desk located in the Annual Conference Registration Area. Your city council may designate one voting delegate and up to two alternates. In order to vote at the Annual Business Meeting (General Assembly), voting delegates and alternates must be designated by your city council. Please attach the council resolution as proof of designation. As an alternative, the Mayor or City Clerk may sign this form, affirming that the designation reflects the action taken by the council. Please note: Voting delegates and alternates will be seated in a separate area at the Annual Business Meeting. Admission to this designated area will be limited to individuals (voting delegates and alternates) who are identified with a special sticker on their conference badge. This sticker can be obtained only at the Voting Delegate Desk. 1. VOTING DELEGATE Name: Title: 2. VOTING DELEGATE - ALTERNATE 3. VOTING DELEGATE - ALTERNATE Name: Name: Title: Title: PLEASE ATTACH COUNCIL RESOLUTION DESIGNATING VOTING DELEGATE AND ALTERNATES. OR ATTEST: I affirm that the information provided reflects action by the city council to designate the voting delegate and alternate(s). Name: E-mail Mayor or City Clerk Phone: (circle one) (signature) Date: Please complete and return by Friday, August 31, 2018 League of California Cities FAX: (916) 658-8240 ATTN: Kayla Curry E-mail: kcurry@cacities.org 1400 K Street, 4th Floor (916) 658-8254 Sacramento, CA 95814 CITY:________________________________________ RESOLUTION NO. 2018- RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA CALLING ON THE U.S. GOVERNMENT TO IMMEDIATELY REUNITE FAMILIES SEPARATED AT THE BORDER WHEREAS, the U.S. government recently ended an immigration enforcement policy that resulted in the separation of more than 2,000 minors from their families; and WHEREAS, an unknown number of minors still remain separated from their families or guardians; and WHEREAS, the City of Chula Vista is a community that values humanity, and believes that all human beings have rights, regardless of their country of origin; and WHEREAS, the City of Chula Vista has a rich cultural heritage including contributions from immigrants around the world; and WHEREAS, the City of Chula Vista is a member of the Welcoming America Network and is applying to become a Certified Welcoming City; and WHEREAS, according to the U.S. Census Bureau, as of July 1, 2017 the population of the City of Chula Vista is estimated to be 31% foreign-born; and WHEREAS, the U.S. State Department’s “Trafficking in Persons Report 2018” concludes: “Removal of a child from the family should only be considered as a temporary, last resort. Studies have found that both private and government-run residential institutions for children, or places such as orphanages and psychiatric wards that do not offer a family-based setting, cannot replicate the emotional companionship and attention found in family environments that are prerequisites to healthy cognitive development”; and WHEREAS, a policy that forcibly separates immigrant families fuels the climate of fear experienced by many immigrants and refugees, causing them to avoid reporting crime to law enforcement agencies, thus making it more difficult to solve crimes; and WHEREAS, separating children from families, especially when the family is merely invoking their right to seek asylum in the U.S., is inconsistent with the values of the City of Chula Vista; and Resolution No. 2018- Page No. 2 WHEREAS, the Chula Vista City Council believes it has an obligation to take a stand against government actions that are immoral and inhumane; and WHEREAS, the City of Chula Vista Human Relations Commission has asked the City Council to consider taking actions to oppose policies resulting in the separation of immigrant children from their families, to support non-criminal processing of immigrant families, and support actions or policies that expedite reunification. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula does as follows: 1. Calls on the United States government to immediately reunite families separated at the U.S. border with Mexico, especially in cases where the family is exercising its right to apply for asylum, or in cases when the only offense committed is crossing the border illegally. 2. Directs the Mayor to forward this resolution to U.S. Representatives Susan Davis and Juan Vargas, U.S. Senators Kamala Harris and Dianne Feinstein, U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions, and President Donald Trump. [SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE] Resolution No. 2018- Page No. 3 Presented by Approved as to form Mary Casillas Salas, Mayor Glen R. Googins, City Attorney Patricia Aguilar, City Councilmember PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, California, this 10th day of July 2018 by the following vote: AYES:Councilmembers:*** NAYS:Councilmembers:*** ABSENT:Councilmembers:*** Mary Casillas Salas, Mayor ATTEST: Kerry K. Bigelow, MMC, City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) CITY OF CHULA VISTA ) I, Kerry K. Bigelow, City Clerk of Chula Vista, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2018-*** was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting of the Chula Vista City Council held on the 10th day of July 2018. Executed this 10thday of July 2018. Kerry K. Bigelow, MMC, City Clerk