Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2018-06-13 PC Agenda
AURA NOTA City of Chula Vista Boards & Commis%jons Planning Commission REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA PLANNING COMMISSION June 13, 2418 Council Chambers 6:00 p.m, Public Services Bldg A 276 Fourth Avenue CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL: Commissioners Anaya, Burroughs, Calvo, Milburn, Nava, taker and Chair Gutierrez MOTIONS TO EXCUSE: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND MOMENT OF SILENCE OPENING STATEMENT: 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: April 25, 2018 PUBLIC COMMENTS: An opportunity for members of the public to speak to the Planning Commission on any subject matter within the Commission's jurisdiction, but not an item on today's agenda. Each speaker's presentation may not exceed three minutes. j PUBLIC HEARINGS The following item(s) have been advertised as public hearing(s) as required by law. If you wish to speak on any item, please fill out a "Request to Speak"form (available in the lobby) and submit it to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting. 2. PUBLIC HEARING MPA17-0005; PCM 06-08; FEIR 07-01; Consideration of amendments to the Eastern Urban Center (EUC) Sectional Planning Area Plan, Form Based Code (PC District Regulations Planning Commission Agenda June 13, 2418 Page-2- and Village Design Plan) and associated regulatory documents to reflect proposed amendments associated with overall buildout intensity, building heights and District 6 regulations. Applicant:SLF 1V/Milienia, LLC Stacey Kurz,Sr. Project Coordinator Staff Recommendation: That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution MPA17- 0005, PCM 06-08 and FEIR07-01, inclusive of staff recommended modifications to the amendment, recommending that the Chula Vista City Council (Council) approve the resolutions. i i 3. PUBLIC HEARING Consideration to add Chapter 19.100 to the Municipal Code to adopt and establish an Urban Agriculture Incentive Zone. Stacey Kurz, Sr. Project Coordinator i Staff Recommendation: That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution MPA18-0045 recommending that the Chula Vista City Council approve: 1) An Ordinance to add Chapter 19.100 to the Municipal Code and establish an Urban Agriculture Incentive Zone. 4. PUBLIC HEARING Consideration of Design Review Permit DR17-0039 to redevelop the site at 201 Third Avenue with a 5-story mixed use project of 23-unit residential apartment building with 2,661 square-feet of commercial space, 20 on-site and 22 off-site parking spaces, landscaped areas, and recreational open space, subject to the conditions contained herein Staff Recommendation: That the Planning Commission approve the Design Review i Permit resolution subject to the attached conditions. OTHER BUSINESS S. DIRECTOR'S REPORT: 6. COMMISSION COMMENTS: ADJOURNMENT to the next Regular Planning Commission Meeting on June 27, 2018, at 6:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers. Planning Commission Agenda June 13, 2018 Page-3- Materials provided to the Planning Commission related to any open-session item on this agenda are available for public review at the City Housing Office, located in City Hall at 276 Fourth Avenue, Building 300, during normal business hours. In compliance with the AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT The City of Chula Vista requests individuals who require special accommodations to access, attend, and/or participate in a City meeting, activity, or service, contact Patricia Laughlin at (619)409-3575(California Relay Service is available for the hearing impaired by dialing 711)at least forty-eight hours in advance of the meeting. crrr of CHUTAVISTA City of Chula Vista Boards L Commissions Planning Commission MY)uf8s REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA PLANNING COMMISSION April 25, 2018 Council Chambers 6:00 p.m. Public Services Bldg A 276 Fourth Avenue CALL TO ORDER MEMBERS PRESENT: Commissioners Anaya; Burroughs, Calvo, Milburn, Nava,.Zaker and Chair Gutierrez I MEMBERS ABSENT: n/a i OTHERS IN ATTENDANCE: Director of Ecohomic Development Eric-Crockett,Asst. Director of Dev Services Tiffany Alit n, Principal Planner Steve Power, four persons representing.M.;cNamara:Dentures, and six residents. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND MOMENT OF SILENCE—lead by guest,Claudia Zaker 3 OPENING STATEMENT: 1. APP:R6VAL'bF..IIiIIINUTES: .- March 2$;`2418 MSC: Zakerr-.�aiva ... Vote: 6-0-1 Nava abstained PUBLIC COMMENTS: .: An opportunity for meT'[`b&s of the public to speak to the Planning Commission on any subject matter within the CorrAission's jurisdiction, but not an item on today's agenda. Each speaker's presentation may not exceed three minutes, a t Mr.Joseph Raso, resident and businessman, again gave a brief presentation regarding the revitalizing of downtown Chula Vista and the, now impossible,situation of providing parking for smaller, older buildings that could be demolished and smaller projects rebuilt. He is championing the need for revision of the parking codes and provided a hand-out to the Commission. Planning Commission Minutes April 25, 2018 Page-2- PUBLIC HEARINGS The following Item(s) have been advertised as public hearing(s) as required by low. If you wish to speak on any item, please fill out a "'Request to Speak"form (available in the lobby) and submit it to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting. 2. PUBLIC HEARING DRI.6-0020; Design Review consideration of a four-story building totaling 35,360 square-feet, consisting o.£ 43 apartment units with associated parking and open space ,pn approximately 0.61 acres located at 288 Center Street. Applicant: McNamara Ventures Resolution of the City of: China Vista ....Rtanning Commission approving a Design Review.Peit,`DR16-002.p to construct a four- story building totaling 35y360 square-feet consistingof 43 apartment units with associated parking and open space on approximately 0,61 acres located at 288 Cent&Street, ., J s Staff Recommendation: That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution DRI 6-0020 approving the project,based on thlindings and subject to the conditions coi tain6d therein. Caroline Young, Associate Planner,gave a`slide presentation that included: • Slides of various areas around the site ■ Views along(hurch Avenue ■ The site plan • Floor`plans • Arch itectural.views 1 • .;;;Ari aerial view of rooftop amenities C1UES QiIVS TO STAFF-M:ostly regarding parking Issues answered by Eric Crockett included: *: Parking issue§•'`how many spaces lost since this is being made housing? F"�:1--::Future parkirig'provisions to be provided by the City i - I •'`'''' Iternative aF in for residents: permits, lots structures .�; p k' g • Tiirte of new parking structures lots—does City already awn? E PUBLIC HEARING OPENED These people Were in favor of the project: • Rammy Cortez ■ Keegan McNamara These people were opposed: • Martha Coulson — traffic concerns due to patrons of the breweries in the evenings ■ David Lane Planning Commission Minutes April 25,2018 Page-2- ■ Elizabeth Melindez ■ Andrew (last name not known—no speaker slip) PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED COMMISSIONER DELIBERATIONS Questions/statements to staff and applicant included: • The State mandated the sale of City owned parking lots to the highest bidder and they can develop as they want. Need to take parking out of the equation as this board is concerned with "Design Review". We can all agree housing is needed. ■ There is no guarantee of parking to residents, :what a're the safeguards when development happens (can use the lot until development starts) :'. , I • What is the timing of additional parking (if funding available-mid 203,early 2020 ■ Has there been a walkability study done?... E • Since the building is not along Third Avenue; ft mitigates some of the impacts and F density is definitely needed. f ■ In the 70's the suburbs were build but and everyone ..drove. Now the lifestyles are becoming different and we have to esFgn:things and live differently. • Need to look at a 10-20 year vision and make .decisions today to benefit tomorrow's residents. Confident that the City's parking plarn.v 1111 solve some of the parking concerns. • There was a question and concern regarding the color scheme. Concerned with the "whiteness" of the` paint in reference to .graffiti. (Anti-graffiti paint to be used. Questioned: f,the bluewas as start and bright as depicted in the slides. The architect stated`that"th.eV,.anted,"an eclectic urban fabric that was vibrant and progressive". j l4k height of the building, as a corner unit, was connected to the height of the church across,the street. • Since We majority off:;<t�e units are one-bedroom, presumably the target market are millenias`and those just starting out in the housing market. nz: • Since the des`igrti_review was not about parking, the Commission should base its findings on the design, the current parking code and not the availability of surrounding parking. ■ Things are changing and we soon won't be a car-driven society. With land being so valuable,the next generation will help things change and we won't need cars so much. • Regarding privacy and overlooking the yards of neighbors — who would be affected? A slide was shown of the location and there were only a few single-family homes on the fringe of Church Street. Planning Commission Minutes April 25,2018 Page-2- • Is there a gate shown in the slide? if the lot is not secure, what is to keep the public from parking there? (Gate is to the Church parking lot and Private Parking signs will be posted. • Is the landscaping in the public right of way and who is to maintain? Yes and the developer is required to maintain it. MSC: 2a ke r/Ca Iva Vote: 7-0-0 OTHER BUSINESS 3. DIRECTOR'S REPORT: i There was none I I f I 4. COMMISSION COMMENTS: i Calvo: Why was the resident who spoke not nof'fced?. Power: Perhaps she was outside.the 500 ft noticing area Milburn: Likes the design. Thanked the developer for coming-to Chula Vista, Nava: Thinks the Municipal Code has:a reco'urseto residents for parking i.e. the parking permit option Power: Not usually for residential areas'�only a few i.e. Southwestern College Anaya: As the parking issue is going to continue, as it gets closer to development of a .,,;par��ling structure or lots;he'would like a staff up-date and presentation of the parkin 'pEan. ADJQURN,MENT at 723gp.m.to.t.ke next Regular Planning Commission Meeting on May 9, 201816f'6:00 P.M., in the Council Chambers. I CHULA VISTA , ----rte PLANNING .+ COMMISSION AGENDA STATEMENT Item: _2_ Meeting Date: 6113118 ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing: MPA17-0005; PCM 06-08; FEIR 07-01; Consideration of amendments to the Eastern Urban Center (EUC) Sectional Planning Area Plan, Form Based Code (PC District Regulations and Village Design Plan) and associated regulatory documents to reflect proposed amendments associated with overall buildout intensity, building heights and District 6 regulations. SUBMITTED BY: Stacey Kurz, Senior Project Coordinator REVIEWED BY: Kelly Broughton,Director of Development Services INTRODUCTION The Millenia project ("Project"), formerly known as the Eastern Urban Center, is located at the southwest corner of Birch Road and Eastlake Parkway, east of the SR 125 toll road(see Locator Map, Attachment 1). The Project was originally adopted on October 6, 2009 by Resolution No. 2009-224 and by Ordinance No. 3142 with subsequent amendments in 2013 and 2016. The project site is 206-acres in area and has been fully graded. Millenia is described as an urban mixed-use center with a maximum buildout of 2,983 multifamily residential units and 3,487 million square feet of commercial uses including office,hospitality, retail and civic uses. SLF IV/Millenia, LLC ("Applicant") is requesting to amend the adopted Eastern Urban Center Sectional Planning Area Plan ("EUC SPA") and Form Based Code (FBC) to reflect a proposed reduction in the ultimate buildout for the project, to revise the Minimum Average Height on six lots from five stories to four stories and modifying the Main Street District regulations by reducing the amount and geographic distribution of commercial uses in the district. The project also includes a Supplemental Public Facilities Financing Plan (PFFP) and updated Fiscal Impact Analysis (FIA) to reflect the proposed amendments. Addendums to the Final Environmental .Impact Report ("FEIR") and the Developer Agreement ("DA") with additional information and analysis of the proposed amendments will also be considered (see EUC Proposed Amendments, Attachment 2). In summary, as proposed, the Project will require amendments to the EUC SPA, FBC, PFFP, FEIR and DA. MPAI7-0405 Page No. 2 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Director of Development Services has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the project was adequately covered in previously adopted Final Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern Urban Center (Millenia) Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan, FEIR 07-01. The Development Services Director has determined that only minor technical changes or additions to this document are necessary and that none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines calling for the preparation of a subsequent document have occurred; therefore, the Development Service Director has prepared an Addendum to FEIR 07-01. RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution MPA 17-0005, PCM 06-08 and FEIR07-01 (see Planning Commission Resolution, Attachment 3), inclusive of staff recommended modifications to the amendment,recommending that the Chula Vista City Council (Council)approve: 1) An Ordinance to amend the SPA Plan and the Form Based Code (see Draft City Council Ordinance—Approval of the Amended SPA and FBC, Attachment 4)to: a. Amend the SPA and Form Based Code to establish a maximum land use intensity of 2,983 residential units and 3.115M square feet of commercial uses. These maximums include a "target" initial buildout of 2,550 residential units and 1.88 million square feet of commercial land uses and a future land use "reserve" of 433 residential units and 1.23M square feet of commercial land uses. b. Revise the Minimum Average Height on six lots from five stories to four stories and modify the minimum height in feet in the Regulating Plan, c. Revisions to the Main Street District (District 6) to reduce the amount of commercial land uses, and modify the geographic distribution of those commercial uses in the district. The amendment also introduces a concept of"height blending" which will provide flexibility to implement a blended project which could be implemented j across land located in both Districts 6 and 9. 2) A Resolution to consider modifications to the Supplemental Public Facilities Financing Plan (PFFP) and updated Fiscal Impact Analysis (FIA), (see Draft City Council Resolution—Approval of the Updated PFFP and FIA, Attachment 5). 3) A Resolution to consider an Addendum to the final Second Tier Environmental Impact Report, FEIR 07-01 (see Draft City Council Resolution— Approval of the Addendum to the FEIR,Attachment 6). MPA17-0005 Page No. 3 4) An Ordinance to amend the Development Agreement (see Draft City Council Ordinance — Approval of the Amended DA, Attachment 7) to document reduction in development intensities. Staff Recommended Modifications The applicant proposes to reduce the currently approved non-residential intensity (shown below as Adopted) for the remainder of the undeveloped portions of the Millenia development. This includes Districts 4, 5, and 6 as shown in Exhibit I-6, Site Utilization Plan in the Draft Sectional Planning Area Plan amendment(Applicant's Proposed shown below). As part of these changes, the applicant has also introduced a concept of a reserve development capacity, suggesting that at some time in the future, potential redevelopment could result in additional non-residential development opportunities. Adopted..:: .Nan-Residential.(1,00HF) Residential DUs District Description Acreage Low Target High Low Target. High 1 Gateway Mixed Use Commercial District 22.7 100 400 700 - 5o 100 2 Northwestern Neighborhood District 13.2 2 120 200 150 300 500 I 3 Northeastern Neighborhood District 17.2 10 5o 250 150 400 750 4 Business District 25.4 505 1,532 1,900 - 100 150 5 Mixed Use Civic/Office Core District 23.3 100 900 1,000 - 200 300 6 Main Street District 34.7 8o 240 400 100 533 800 7 Eastern Gateway District 9.6 - - - 50 200 300 8 Southwestern Neighborhood District 12.5 2 50 200 300 500 700 9 Central Southern!Neighborhood District 24.4 - 45 100 130 500 650 10 Southeastern Neighborhood District 23.6 - 150 200 200 200 450 Total 206.6 1 L299 3,487 1,09D 2,983 Appiirant Proposed Non-Residential(1,DD05F) Residential DUs District Description Acreage Low Target High Low Target High .1 Gateway Mixed Use Commercial District 22,7 227 227 400 89 89 89 2 Northwestern Neighborhood District 13.2 2 2 2 273 273 273 3 Northeastern Neighborhood District IT - 2 5 300 398 475 4 Business District 25.4 500 1,122 1,670 - 150 280 5 Mixed Use Civic/Office Core District 23.3 100 455 1,434 - 108 200 6 Main Street District 34.7 65 72 100 450 557 910 7 Eastern Gateway District 9.6 - - - 100 117 130 8 Southwestern Neighborhood District 12.5 2 2 2 253 253 260 9 Central Southern Neighborhood District 24.4 - 5 5 275 325 375 10 Southeastern Neighborhood District 23.6 - 101 230 280 335 Total 206.6 86 1,887 1,970 2,550 Reserve Intensity 1,228 433 Maximum Intensity 3,115 2,983 The total reduction proposed in the non-residential intensity is 1.6 million square feet. The applicant suggests that market conditions, other development entitlements approved by the City in Dtay Ranch, and changes in the nature of office and retail development necessitate this reduction, While the City appreciates the position of the applicant, Staff raised concerns about the potential for dilution of non-residential uses within Millenia when the SPA Plan was MPA17-0005 Page No. 4 amended at the request of the applicant to relocate the elementary school site in August 2016. This approval raised the possibility that 445,000 square feet of non-residential development could be removed in the future and staff raised concern about where this potential intensity would go in other undeveloped districts. In order to move forward and recognize some loss of employment lands, Staff recommends Planning Commission's approval of the applicant's proposed amendments with the modifications described below. Overall Staff recommends that the SPA Plan be modified to have only a low and a high intensity range as shown in the following table. The non-residential high intensity would still be lower that the adopted SPA Plan described above, recognizing that some of the districts are constructed, and also to reflect the staff recommendation for District 6 described below. The new low non- residential densities would be increased in Districts 4 and 5 to reflect a lower development expectation. The residential high intensity would still allow the maximum amount of residential units as shown in the adopted SPA Plan, This recommendation eliminates a set target and allows the applicant to work within the low and high ranges, No"esidential(.1,0W5F) Residential DUs District Description Acreage Low . Target High Low Target High 1 Gateway Mixed Use Commercial District 22.7 227 400 - 89 2 Northwestern Neighborhood District 13.2 2 2 273 273 3 Northeastern Neighborhood District 1.7.2 2 5 150 475 i 4 Business District* 25.4 SIX} 1,900 225 5 Mixed Use Civic/Office Core District 23.3 455 900 - 300 6 Main Street District 34.7 80 SOD 100 601 7 Eastern Gateway District 9.6 - 1.00 117 8 Southwestern Neighborhood District 12.5 2 2 253 253 9 Central Southern Neighborhood District 24.4 5 130 350 10 Southeastern Neighborhood District 23.6 10 230 300 TOtal 206.fi 1,568 - 3,324 1,236 - 2,9$3 City Proposal Recommendations: . For District 4a phased development of less than 800 K square feet but not less than 500 K square feet may be permitted provided a conceptual site plan is provided demonstrating the remaining 300 K square feet is feasible in a future phase With Staff's proposed modification, there would no longer be a target intensity range. This would necessitate select revisions to the proposed SPA plan to be consistent with this recommendation. District 6 The Applicant proposed to reduce the non-residential intensity range in the Main Street District (District 6) as shown in the draft District Regulations and Design Guidelines, Exhibit II-19a. Under the Applicant's original proposal, non-residential uses would have been reduced by 40,000 square feet in the low range, 194,000 square feet in the target range, and by 300,000 square feet in the high intensity range. MPA17-0005 Page No. 5 Staff understands that development of ground floor commercial uses is challenging,however, yet mixed use developments are being entitled and built with ground floor commercial in Eastern Chula Vista (Olympic Parkway), Western Chula Vista (H Street), Barrio Logan, Imperial Beach and National City. Vacancy rates for retail are at historic lows meaning there is not enough space being built to accommodate demand. New space being built is 100%pre-leased and future residential and office development within Millenia will continue to drive the need for additional space and thus, staff feels it should be preserved. In striving to address staffs comments the Applicant proposed to increase.non-residential uses over their original submittal by 25,000 square feet in the low range to a new minimum of 65,000 square feet and an additional 26,000 square feet in the target range to a new target of 72,000 square feet. The Applicant has also proposed two commercial development options that provide flexibility in what can count towards non-residential uses such as live/work loft and creative office space. The options also provide flexibility on the timing of how those uses get developed to recognize that demand for commercial space is likely to change over time. Staff appreciates the Applicant's willingness to make these proposed modifications to address staff's concerns with the loss of non-residential (employment) uses. Staff believes the proposed Project changes to reduce non-residential uses is premature, after only 7 years since beginning construction in Millenia and only 2.7 years after the first residential project occupancy occured. Staff also notes that the existing SPA Plan emphasizes the need for flexibility in all aspects of the Project for success and, thus, believes the Project's construction should also maintain flexibility for changes in future market. Staff, therefore,proposes approval of a further increase in the low intensity range over that being proposed by the Applicant. The new low intensity non-residential is recommended by staff to be 80,000 square feet. Again, staff believes that given the flexibility provided in the following District Regulations and Design Guidelines, the project applicant should be able to achieve 80,000 square feet with a future project. In addition, staff recommends the following replace the Applicants proposed revisions to the District Regulations and Design Guidelines Section 02.04.003: 02.04.003 Main Street District Mixed Use Provisions a. Overview: Most historical "main streets" evolve and do not begin with their ultimate mix of uses. The Millenia Main Street District will likewise be implemented and evolve over time. b. For purposes of this section 02.04.003 the following definitions shall apply: 1. "Commercial"means both Initial Commercial space and Interim Use space 2. ""Initial Commercial" means commercial space constructed as part of initial construction and intended for immediate commercial usage 3. "Interim Use" means space designed to the commercial standards described below, but allowed for use as residential subject to the applicable provisions in Section d. below c. Required Commercial Components of the Main Street District MPA17-0405 Page No. 6 1. The minimum amount of commercial shall be 80,000 square feet. 2. The target amount of commercial shall be 90,000 square feet d. The main street Commercial square footage may be implemented in phases to coincide with market demand for commercial uses, or implemented in it's entirety as part of initial development, at the applicants discretion. The following criteria shall apply; however, the City may approve reductions in the minimum amount of Commercial (subject to the findings contained in Section 04.05.000), and exceptions to the criteria below for a proposal which advances unique solutions, such as the use of liner retail space, which can provide the desired activation and pedestrian experience with less or alternatively configured physical space. 1. A low of 80,000 square feet of Commercial space should be provided subject to the provisions below. 2. Up to 33% of the Commercial square footage can be implemented as live/work residential units or office space. 3. Up to 10%of Commercial can be provided as dedicated outdoor retail space. 4. Minimum plate heights for Initial Commercial space including the mixed use commercial space on lots 8,9,14 and 15 should be 15 feet. Minimum plate heights for live-work units constructed as Initial Commercial should be 10 feet. 5. Commercial spaces should be designed, where possible, in a way that allows these spaces to expand or contract with the housing modules above while incorporating strategies to reduce costs for design, construction and tenant improvements thus avoiding costly steel structures or elevated concrete podium designs. 6. Live/work and office spaces should be a minimum depth of 30 feet. 7. Commercial spaces should be a minimum depth 40 feet. i 8. The Commercial space on Lots 8,9,14 and 15 may be designed and implemented as a separate, stand-alone project subject to the following: a) This space may be separately final mapped, and designed and implemented separately from the remaining residential-only development on lots 8,9,14&15. b) Master Developer shall actively market the commercial opportunity and provide the City with copies of marketing materials for the site. c) Commercial space may be implemented in a phased manner to coincide with market demand. d) A minimum of 4,000 square feet of Initial Commercial will be committed as available for retail commercial leasing on each of the four blocks at completion of initial construction on each of the respective blocks (total of 15,000 sf). e) Other than the Initial Commercial space identified in 8.d.. above, the commercial space on these lots may be implemented as Interim Use for residential. Any space implemented as Interim Use for residential will be required to be actively marketed by the owner to prospective commercial tenants for a maximum period of ten years. Every five years, the owner must submit a third party marketing appraisal to the City to determine the viability of continued marketing of space for commercial tenants. MPAI7-0005 Page No. 7 f) Interim Use building facades should implement design techniques to articulate spaces that can be either retail or residential. Such techniques could include, but are not limited to, a mix of solid materials, varied ceiling heights, pilasters, divided glazing systems, special light fixtures, and covered arcades. e. Town Square Commercial. The configuration of the Town Square Park shall be established administratively as a part of the Concept Master Plan process. Please refer to Exhibit II-19b for planning and implementation details for retail in this area. Staff believes the above regulations maintain the flexibility for the Main Street District to evolve over time as the Applicant has indicated while also clarifying some of the strategies that the City expects to be incorporated into future projects that help to preserve the opportunity for as much non-residential use as possible and preserve pedestrian interest with appropriate design elements. Reserves Staff understands that if higher future development intensities are preserved, there always remains a possibility that redevelopment might occur. Despite that, staff feels that projecting future intensification is speculative unless a clear plan for how it will happen is prepared. Staff therefore proposes to eliminate the concept of a reserve and replace it with the revised low and high non-residential and residential intensities as described above. Un-built intensities between the ranges may still be transferred between districts consistent with the proposed SPA Plan language. i If Planning Commission supports this recommendation, then in addition to the modifications of Sections 02.04.003 and 02.04.006 identified above; Section 04.02.000 - Review Processes; Section 04.05.00 — Intensity Transfers; Chapter 5 - Monitoring and Updates; the project description along with Exhibit I-1 Proposed Site Utilization Plan in the draft proposal; Exhibit 1 in the PFFP; District Regulations and Design Guidelines Exhibits II5a, II-9a, II-13a, II-19a, I1- 23a, II-28a, II-30a, II-32a, II-32a, II-34a, and II-36a should be modified per the above staff proposal to reflect the new low and high non-residential and residential intensity levels for all. Districts. Staff, therefore, recommends Planning Commission recommend City Council's approval of the proposed project including the revisions identified to implement Staff's proposed amendments. In addition to the staff recommended changes, the applicant has proposed the following two additional clarifications to their original Form Based Code proposal that staff also recommends for Planning Commission approval: Page III-68 (6) Provision for height district blending: As shown on Exhibit 1-1, lot numbers l7 and 24 are west of the Regional Trail, south of Metro Park, and lot numbers 18 and 23, are east of the Regional Trails. Lots 17 and 24 are designated 3-story and 4-story respectively. Lots 18 and 23 are also designated 3-story and 4-story respectively. The 3-story and 4-story height districts for Lots 17 and 24 may be blended as a mix of 3 and 4 story buildings, all 3-story, or all 4-story, MPA17-0005 Page No. 8 providing they are approved as a comprehensive plan for both lots. The height determination shall be as approved during Design Review and shall be based on the overall design meeting the intended urban character rather than height as the sole design, determinant. This height district flexibility is also permitted for Lots 18 and 23. Page 111-77 b.vii, Setback deviations as necessary to accommodate slopes or grade differences along the street or building setback line, and unique operational characteristics (queuing, access or other factors) which preclude them from meeting setbacks. DISCUSSION Backp-round As of May 2018, approximately 70% of the 145 acres of private development land has either been sold to merchant builders or is under contract with builders. The land sales to date include every land use contemplated for Millenia including office, retail, hotel, and residential: rental, for-sale and affordable housing projects, Two projects have been completed and fully occupied including the 273-unit Pulse Millenia Apartments and the 210-unit Chelsea Investments Duetta family and Volta senior affordable apartments. Eight additional projects are currently under construction including: • Ayres Hotel---a 135-room four story hotel. Scheduled to open by the end of 2018. ■ The Sudberry Properties Millenia Commons Retail Center-- a 130,000 square-foot retail center with major tenants including Buy-Buy Baby, Ross, Home Goods and Cost Plus. Scheduled opening late 2018. • Trammell Crow Residential Alexan Apartments—a 309-unit mixed use rental project with 10,000 square feet of commercial and live-work units. First occupancy scheduled for June 2018. ■ Trammell Crow Residential Esplanade Apartments — a 253-unit rental community scheduled to open in mid-2019. • Metro, Evo and Trio by Meridian Communities—a 217-unit condominium project. As of May 2018,the project has sold more than 130 homes. • Element and Z by Shea Homes—a two-product community comprised of 106 three story townhomes and 70 detached urban homes. As of May 2018, more than 100 of the homes had been sold, • Skylar by KB Homes — a 79-unit project of detached urban homes. As of May 2018, 14 of the homes had been sold. • Boulevard by Lennar — a 78-unit townhome project. As of May 2018, building permits had been pulled for approximately 30-units and first occupancies are anticipated in October of this year. In addition, Chesnut Properties is in City building plan check for the first of three office campus projects which includes 318,000 square-feet of class A office, a 5,100 square-feet amenity MPA17-0005 Page No. 9 building and a five-story parking structure. Meridian Communities has also submitted a Design Review application for Pinnacle, a proposed four-story for-sale project. More than four miles of new streets serving the development have been installed to date, with the final phase of infrastructure development slated to start construction in the fall of this year. Millenia also includes six parks, a fire station, a pedestrian bridge over Eastlake Parkway, and a site for a future elementary school. One of the parks has been completed and is open for public use, and three more are under design and expected to start construction within the next 9-12 months. The fire station is under design and expected to be completed in early 2020, and the pedestrian bridge is under design with construction slated to begin later this year. The school site has been graded but timing for the school's construction has not yet been identified by the District. The project also incorporates a segment of the San Diego Association of Governments ("SANDAG') Bus Rapid Transit line. The construction of the first two segments of the guideway in the Millenia project have been advanced by the Applicant and will be complete in summer of this year. SANDAG has agreed to implement service to Millenia starting in 2019. [ Analysis 1. Maximum Project Buildout As noted earlier, the current entitlements allow for a maximum buildout of 2,983 multi-family residential units and 3.487 million square feet of non-.residential commercial land. Non--Residential Build Out The proposed amendment includes a new maximum buildout of 2,983 residential units and 3.115 million square feet, which represents no change in the maximum residential unit count and a reduction of 372,000 square feet of commercial uses from the adopted plan. The proposal doesn't modify any of the boundaries of any of the land use districts, or reduce the acreage of land available for employment uses. A discussion of the job generation of the proposed amendment is included in the discussion of the Supplemental PFFP and compliance with the Design and Regulatory Purposes of the SPA are discussed later. Target and Reserve Land Uses Millenia was intended to build out over a period of decades, with the project intensifying over time in response to market demand and opportunities. This concept is embedded in sections of the SPA including discussion on building and surface parking lots in the FBC: 03.15.007 Surface Lots a. Permanent Parking Lots "..It is expected that some permanent parking lots will ultimately be replaced by structured parking or additional buildings as the EUC intensifies over time. This type of permanent lots may exist for a number of years as a surface parking lot depending on market conditions, and will be depicted on the comprehensive block plan at the time of MPA17-0005 Page No. 10 application for Design Review, and will be approved as part of the Design Review application for the site. " 04.02.000 Review Processes a. Design Review: "..Another, alternative is the consideration ofphased intensification. A building complex may intensify over time as a planned intensification. This phasing may be approved with the initial Design Review application at the option of the applicant." The proposed amendment modifies the initial "target" buildout to 2,550 units and 1.88 million square feet of commercial uses, To provide for future intensification over the coming decades, a "reserve" amount of 433 residential units and 1.23 million square feet is provided in the plan. Together the target and reserve intensities would support a maximum buildout of 2,983 units and 3.115 million square feet of commercial uses. The proposed target buildout and difference in intensities between the current and proposed plans is shown below and on Exhibit I-6 (page 1-25) of the proposed SPA amendment. Initial and Maximum BJdout Changes Initial Buildout("Target") Maximum Buildout i Residential Units Commercial Sq. Ft. Residential Emits Commercial Sq. Ft. Approved SPA Not identified Not identified 2,983 3,487,000 Proposed 2,550 1,880,000 2,983 3,115,000 Amendment Difference 0 -372,000 The reserve land uses may be allocated in the future by the City in response to future requests to intensify existing development in Millenia. Except for 1.45 million square feet of reserve commercial land use which has specifically been allocated to the three lots comprising the Chesnut office project at the request of the office developer(see Chesnut Office Project Request Letter, Attachment 3), the reserve land uses are not specifically allocated to any location in the plan and may be allocated anywhere in the plan in the future at the City's discretion, per existing permitted transfer language in the SPA. 2. Building Heights The FBC regulates building heights based on the concepts of minimum, maximum and average heights. They further identify the minimum height by either allowable stories or feet. The plan is divided into a series of building height districts, each of which prescribe a minimum average building height which must be met on the lots within the district. As an example, within a five- story building height district, it would be possible to build four story buildings as long as five or six story buildings were also constructed, such that the average building height within the height district averaged out to five stories. Regulating Plan Minimum Average Height The Applicant is proposing to modify the Regulating Plan, reference Exhibit I11-49 on page III- 69 of the FBC, to reduce the minimum average stories from five to four stories on six lots (SPA MPA17-0005 Page No. 11 Plan Lots 10, 13, 19, 22-24). This change would affect approximately 7% of the acreage in the overall project, as follows: ■ Lot 10--existing rive story affordable housing development(Duetta and Volta). • Lot 13 —undeveloped. Lots 19 and 22 — owned by Applicant and currently being processed as a four-story product("Pinnacle"). • Lots 23 and 24 - owned by Applicant and undeveloped. The Applicant indicates that a five-story residential product is not viable in the current market. If the proposed amendment is not approved and Lots 19 and 22 are developed with the current proposed project Pinnacle, Lots 23 and 24 would be obligated to be built at a minimum of six stories to meet the average height requirements in the approved FBC. Minimum Building Height As the height requirements can be met via either the number of stories or the building heights in feet, the Applicant is also proposing to modify the approved minimum building height. In addition, in the approved FBC no minimum height in feet was established for non-commercial uses and is being proposed at this time. The proposed minimum heights and difference between the existing and proposed building height requirement table are shown below and on Exhibit III- 49 (page lII-69)of the proposed FBC amendment. Minimum Building Height (Sq. Ft.) Changes Residential Non-Residential Height in Feet Height in Feet Stories Approved SPA Proposed Approved SPA Proposed Amendment Amendment 1 25 25 Not identified 25 2 35 30 Not identified 35 3 40 35 Not identified 40 4 Not identified 45 Not identified 5o 5 70 55 Not identified 70 The Applicant has provided representative imagery for the four-story product to demonstrate that the reduction in Minimum Average Height from five to four-stories will still provide both a compatible massing with adjacent existing and proposed development and a pedestrian-oriented experience(see Four Story Imagery, Attachment 4). Height Blending The concept of height blending has also been introduced in the proposed amendment on page III- 68 of the FBC due to the combination of lots, which concept could be implemented across land located in both Districts 5 and 9. Compliance with Applicable District Guidelines All future buildings will still be required to comply with the Building Typologies and the Architectural Design Guidelines of the Millenia plan. Further, the proposed reduction in MPA17-0005 Page No. 12 Minimum Average Height will not compromise the ability of future development in this height district to continue to comply with the applicable principles and concepts contained within the FBC. These include the Organizing Principles and Urban Design Vision, as well as the Overall and Architectural criteria of the underlying residential districts: These include the following; a. Variety of housing products and forms. b. Street oriented urban format housing with shared public spaces. c. .Located within strolling distance to main street hub and urban parks. d. poster a sense of neighborhood idents and community,featuring a diversity of housing types organized around neighborhood parks. e. Communicate the residential function of a building with an emphasis on domestic scale and details, including three-dimensional design features such as chimneys, porches, balconies and bays. f. Vertical and architectural flexibility instead of repetitious design themes. g. Use common gathering places rather than private useable open space. h. Design Buildings which have an "Urban Character"even in 2-3 story formats. i. Move buildings close to streets with front. doors or common entry portals facing the street. 3. Main Street District The Main Street District is the mixed-use heart of the Millenia plan. The current plan envisions an activated and vibrant mixed-use environment with ground floor commercial uses and residential or office uses above. Horizontal mixed use is also permitted. The terminus of the Main Street District is Metro Park, a 2.28-acre privately owned and maintained (but publicly accessible) park. The land uses currently in the plan for the Main Street District is a target of 240,000 square feet of commercial uses, with a low of 80,000 square feet and a high end of 400,000 square feet. It should be pointed out that any land use intensity between the low and the high in any district is considered to be consistent with the SPA plan. The Applicant indicates that the current retail market is not expected to be able to absorb the amount of retail which is currently required for this district in the timeframe in which the Applicant expects the Main Street to develop, and is therefore proposing to modify the amount and distribution of commercial uses in the Main Street District. The proposed amendment to revise the land use ranges in the Main Street District is shown below and is more fully described beginning on page II-20 of the proposed FBC amendment, and the proposed reductions of nom-residential intensity range in the Main Street District (District 6) are shown in District Regulations and Design Guidelines Exhibit II-I9a. MPA17-,0005 Page No. 13 Main Street District Land Use Changes Residential Non-Residential* Low Target High Low Target High Existing SPA too 533 800 80 240 400 Proposed 450 557 910 65 72 100 Amendment Differ +350 +24 +110 -15 -16$ -300 *All commercial numbers are in thousands The Applicant is proposing two options for implementing the commercial land uses in the Main Street District, either of which could be selected by the developer at their discretion: Option I —Build the entire commercial component of the Main Street in accordance with the required square footage, subject to the following provisions: a) Up to 33%can be implemented as live/work units or creative office space; b) Up to 10%can be dedicated as outdoor retail space; and c) The minimum plate height for dedicated commercial shall be 15 feet and 10 feet for live/work units. 6 3 Exhibit II-16 shows the proposed concept for Option 1, which includes a mix of ground floor office, retail and live-work units on the Main Street blocks and a mix of creative office space (i.e. WeWork and Makers space), and an expanded commercial presence, comprised of dedicated commercial and live work units located around Metro Park. 3 3 Option 2 — Build 16,000 square feet of the commercial as dedicated commercial space day one. Build the remaining commercial space, as space which could be leased as residential during an interim period. The developer would be required to actively market the space to commercial users for five years, and would be required to submit a marketing appraisal report to the City to determine the viability of continued marketing for commercial users. Staff'Recommendadon As discussed in the Staff Recommended Modifications above, staff proposes that Planning Commission recommend approval of a further increase in the low intensity ranges over those now being proposed by the applicant. The new low intensity non-residential is recommended by staff to be 80,400 square feet with the high intensity recommended at 100,000 square feet. These increases will preserve commercial lands and the original intent of the Main Street District to "..support a vibrant atmosphere that consists of mainly ground floor retail, services, eating establishments and public spaces." Public Facilities Finance Plan (PFFP) and Fiscal Impact Analysis (FIA) A PUP has been prepared as a supplemental document to the original PFFP dated October 6, 2009. The Supplemental PUP analyzes the changes to the ultimate buildout land use intensities, any potential impacts on public facilities and services, and identifies the facilities, phasing and timing triggers for the provision of facilities and services to serve the project, consistent with the City's Quality of Life Threshold Standards. The analysis concludes that the proposed reduction M PA17-0405 Page No. 14 in buildout land use intensities would not negatively impact any of the applicable thresholds or standards. It should be noted that the Supplemental PFFP is relatively simple as the Applicant has agreed to comply with all prior conditions of the Millenia plan, including all required EIR mitigation measures, despite the proposed reduction in buildout intensities in the plan. The 2009 PFFP estimated that at full buildout, the Millenia plan could be expected to generate approximately 9,206 total jobs. If only the target commercial uses in the proposed plan were .realized (and the project didn't continue to intensify over the coming decades) it would generate approximately 8,254 jobs, a reduction of 434 jobs from the 2009 pian at full buildout. The Applicant's proposal also includes a revised Fiscal Impact Analysis (FIA) evaluating the proposed amendment. This FIA has been prepared using the City's new fiscal model which was first provided to the Applicant in October of last year. Staff worked with the Applicant who provided the necessary project-specific inputs to the plan needed to calculate the City's maintenance costs. It is important to note that the FIA presents a projection of the anticipated fiscal impacts of the development, based upon the best information currently available. Actual fiscal impacts as a result of development may vary from model outcomes. The FIA evaluates the following scenarios: i 1. Proposed Amendment Maximum Buildout - This scenario assumes development of the proposed maximum buildout, including 2,550 residential units and 3.115 million square feet of non-residential uses. The non-residential uses assumed include approximately 2.55 million square feet of office, 388,000 square feet of retail uses, 130,000 square feet of civic uses(school and fire station), and a single 135-room hotel. 2. 2009 Adopted Plan Maximum Buildout (assumes 500 hotel rooms) — This scenario assumes development of the adopted maximum building, including 2,983 residential units and 3.487 million square feet of non-residential uses. The non-residential uses assumed in the 2009 plan include approximately 2.0 million square feet of office, approximately 800,000 square feet of retail uses, 150,000 square feet of civic uses, and two hotels totaling 500 rooms. 3. 2009 Adopted Plan with reduced Hotel (assumes 135 hotel rooms)-- In recognition of the fact that since the original Millenia entitlements were approved the City has approved three hotels in addition to the one approved in Millenia—this scenario looks at the 2009 full build scenario but includes only the 135-room hotel currently under construction (reduction of 365 hotel rooms). Based on the FIA and the assumptions contained therein, all of the scenarios above are projected to generate a positive net fiscal impact to the City by year two (201912020). The relative fiscal performance of the three scenarios over a 30-year buildout term are compared in the table below. MPA17-0005 Page No. 15 Comparison of Modeled Fiscal Impact Scenarios Projected Annual Net Impact, Millions Year.5 Year 10 Year 15 Year 20 Year 25 Year 30 Proposed. Revenues $ 4.7 $ 7.7 $ 8.7 $ 9.8 $ 11.3 $ 13.1 Amendment Expenses $ (3.2) $ (6.3) $ (7.1) $ (7.3) $ (7.4) $ (7.6) 135 Hotel Rooms Net Impact $ 1.5 $ 1.4 $ 1.5 $ 2,6 $ 3.8 $ .5.5 2009 Adopted Plan Revenues $ 2.4 $ 6.0 $ 9.9 $ 12.0 $ 13.8 $ 15.4 (135 Hotel Rooms) Expenses $ (2.1) $ (4.8) $(7.2) $ (7.4) $ (7.6) $ (7.7) Net Impact $ 0.3 $ 1.1 $ 2.7 .$.4.6 $ 6.2 $ 7.7 2009 Adopted Plan Revenues $ 2.4 $ 7.6 $ 11.7 $ 14.4 $ 15.9 $ 17.7 (500 Hotel Rooms) Expenses $ (2.0) $ (4.8) $ (7.2) $ (7.4) $ (7.6) $ (7.7) Net Impact $ 0.3 $ 2.8 $ 4.5 $ 6.65 $ 8.3 $ .10.0 The Proposed Amendment (135 Hotel Room) scenario assumes development phasing as summarized in the table below. Proposed Amendment Development Phasing Assumptions* Year 5 Year 10 Year 15 Year 20 Year 25 Year 30 Residential Units 1,596 2,983 2,983 2,983 2,983 2,983 Hotel Rooms 135 3.35 135 135 135 135 Retail&Hotel SF 325,388 388,846 388,846 388,846 388,846 388,846 Office SF 688,500 1,581,000 1,657,500 1,810,500 2,040,000 2,550,000 TotalNon-ResidentialSF 1,413,888 1,969,846 2,046 346 2,199,346 2,428,846 2,938,846 *Note: Civic uses are assumed to have no netfscal impact and are therefore excluded. The Proposed Amendment phasing assumptions can be compared with the assumptions in the 2009 Adopted Plan fiscal analysis, summarized in the table below. 2009 Adopted Plan Development Phasing Assumptions Year 5 Year 7 Year 12 Year 17 Year 22 Residential Units 1,245 1,743 2,983 2,983 2,983 Hotel Rooms 250 500 500 504 500 Hotel SF 187,500 375,000 375,000 375,000 375,000 Retail SF 73,850 221,550 738,500 883,400 980,000 Office SF 88,650 265,950 886,500 1,552,200 1,996,000 Total Non-Residential SF 350,000 862,500 2,040,004 2,810,600 3,351,400 Overall, comparing projected net annual fiscal impacts in year 30 for the 2009 Adopted Plan and the Proposed Amendment($1.0.0 million and $5.5 million, respectively) indicates a $4.5 million reduced annual positive fiscal impact. It is important to note that a key driver reducing the fiscal benefit to the City between the .Proposed Amendment scenario and the 2409 Adopted Plan scenario is Transient Occupancy Taxes, and the fact that the City's model attributes very little service costs to hotels. At year 30, approximately $2.3 million of the projected net fiscal benefit associated with the 2009 Adopted Maximum Buildout Scenario is attributable to the 365 additional hotel rooms assumed under that scenario. This is a relevant comparison as it recognizes that the City has not lost the TOT revenues, but rather those revenues have been MPAV-0045 Page No. 16 relocated to other locations in the Eastern Territories where hotels have been added since the entitlements for Millenia were approved in 2009. Addendum to FEIR 07-01 Section 21002 of the CEQA requires that an environmental impact report identify the significant effects of a project on the environment and provide measures or alternatives that can mitigate or avoid those significant effects. The Millenia SPA was analyzed in the previously adopted Final Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern Urban Center (Millenia) Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan (FEIR 07-01) (SCH #2007041074). Previous Addendums were prepared for two prior SPA Plan Amendments. The First Addendum to the FEIR was approved as part of an amendment to modify building heights and land uses affecting the Genesis project in March of . 2013. The second Addendum to the FEIR analyzed the impact of relocating the school site and modify building height boundaries associated with the Millenia Commons retail project. As a result of the analysis of the proposed amendment, the basic conclusions and impacts identified in FEIR 07-01 were determined to not have changed. The land use and public service impacts are found to be less than significant for the current proposed plan amendments and were adequately covered in FEIR 07-01. Therefore, in accordance with Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines, the City has prepared.the third Addendum to the FEIR. Compliance of Proposed Amendment with Goals of the Millenia Plan Inclusive of staff's recommendation to increase the District 6 low, target and high intensities for non-residential development, the proposed amendments to the Millenia Plan implement, and are consistent with both the City's General Plan and Gtay Ranch General Development Plan policies and objectives for the Eastern Urban Center. It is consistent with the GP and GDP goals and vision for the Eastern Urban Center which contemplate a transit-oriented high intensity urban center serving the City and Dtay Ranch master plan. As discussed in the sections above, staff also believes the amendments with proposed staff recommendations are consistent with the applicable district standards, including the Character descriptions for the applicable residential districts and the Main Street District. While the proposed amendment would allow a maximum buildout for Millenia which is less than is contemplated under the adopted 2009 plan, staff believes that it still remains in compliance with the Design Character and Regulatory Purpose goals of the adopted plan. Development Agreement Amendment Because of the material change being proposed by the developer to reduce the total amount of development, an amendment to the original Development Agreement (DA) documenting this reduction is required. Per Section 2.13 of the DA, material changes are required to be approved through the adoption of an ordinance pursuant to the laws governing development agreements. Attachment 2 to the staff report contains a draft ordinance for consideration by the Planning Commission amending the DA. MPA17-4005 Page No. 17 As identified in the City staff report when the Eastern Urban Center (EUC) project was originally approved on September 15, 2009 and recorded on October 27, 2009 as Document No. 2009-0595116 of Official Records in the Office of the San Diego County Recorder, two of the public benefits in considered in City Council's approval of the DA will be impacted by the proposed project. The first benefit identified was that the completed project would generate nearly 10,000 jobs. The proposed project reduces the target non-residential component of the project by 1.6 million square feet and likely will result in less jobs than originally anticipated. While the applicant is leaving a reserve of 1.23 million square feet of additional non-residential development that could be constructed in the future within the project,it cannot be assured. The second benefit identified was annual net revenue over the cost of providing municipal services of approximately $5.0 million in buildout year 22. As shown above, the updated fiscal impact analysis using a more current fiscal model shows that the original project could have resulted in estimated annual net revenues of$10.0 million in year 30. Applying this new fiscal model to the proposed project amendment, including the reduced non-residential development, the estimated annual net revenue is projected to be approximately $5.5 million in year 30. While this equates to a reduction of$4.5 .million annually from the approved plan, it still represents a significant positive fiscal impact to the City's General Fund. DECISION MAKER CONFLICTS: Staff has reviewed the property holdings of the Planning Commission and has found no property holdings within 500 feet of the boundaries of the property which is the subject to this action, Staff is not independently aware, nor has staff' been informed by any Planning Commission ; member, of any other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision-maker conflict of interest in this matter. CURRENT YEAR FISCAL: All application fees and processing costs are borne by the Applicant, resulting in no net impact to the General Fund or the Development Services Fund. ONGOING FISCAL: As discussed in the Fiscal Impact Analysis section of this report, the Proposed Amendment is projected to result in net positive fiscal impacts throughout the development period,ranging from $1.5 million to $5.5 million annually. Cumulative impacts of the Proposed Amendment buildout scenario during the term of the 30-year analysis are anticipated to total approximately $69.8 million, with an annual average positive impact of$2.3 million. The table below summarizes the projected annual net fiscal impact for representative buildout years for the Proposed Amendment, the 2009 Adopted Plan as originally approved (assuming 500 hotel rooms), and the 2009 Adopted Pian(assuming only the 135 hotel rooms constructed to date). MPA17-0005 Page No. 18 Comparison of Modeled Fiscal Impact Scenarios Annual Net Impact,Millions Year 5 Year 10 Year 15 Year 20 Year 25 Year 30 Proposed Revenues $ 4.7 $ 7.7 $ 8.7 $ 9.8 $ 11.3 $ 13.1 Amendment Expenses $ (3.2) $ (6.3) $ (7.1) $ (7.3) $ (7.4) $ (7.6) 135 Hotel Rooms Net Impact $ 1.5 $ 1.4 $ 1.5 $ 2.6 $ 3.8 $ 5.5 2009 Adopted Plan Revenues $ 2.4 $ 6.0 $ 9.9 $ 12.0 $ 13.8 $ 15.4 (135 Hotel Rooms) Expenses $ (2.1) $ (4.8) $ (7.2) $ (7.4) $ (7.6) $ (7.7) Net Impact $ 0.3 $ 1.1 $ 2.7 $ 4.6 $ 5.2 $ 7.7 2009 Adopted Plan Revenues $ 2.4 $ 7.6 $ 11.7 $ 14.0 $ 15.9 $ 17.7 (504 Hotel Rooms) Expenses $ (2.0) $ (4.8) $(7.2) $ (7.4) $ (7.6) $ (7.7) Net ITpact $ 0.3 $ 2.8 $ 4.5 $ 6.5 $ 8.3 $ 10.0 As illustrated in the table above, reducing the hotel rooms assumed to be developed by 365 decreases the projected annual positive impact in year 30 by approximately$2.3 million. This accounts for just over 50% of the total projected positive impact reduction in year 30 resulting from the Proposed Amendment. Additional adjustments to the development plan further reduce the year 30 projected net positive fiscal benefit from $10.4 million (2009 Adopted Plan with 504 hotel rooms)to $5.5 million. i While a comparison of the Proposed Amendment with the 2009 Adopted Plan (with 500 hotel rooms) indicates positive impacts of approximately $4.5 million annually in year 30, the plan continues to indicate significant net positive impacts to the City's General Fund as a result of the Millenia project. When considering the above, it is important to note that the Fiscal Impact Analysis presents projections based upon the best information currently available. Actual fiscal impacts as a result of this development may vary from those indicated by the model. Pursuant to Section 4.5 (Operating Deficit) of the Millenia Development Agreement, the Master Developer will cover the City's net operating deficit during the initial years of the project (excluding fire services), up to a cumulative maximum of$500,000. The amount of the deficit is to be determined via a fiscal study to be prepared by the City at the Master Developer's cost. Per the Development Agreement, the first fiscal analysis "shall be conducted following the end of the fiscal year which is two (2) years following the first occupancy within the Property, and annually thereafter at the end of each fiscal year." The first Millenia certificate of occupancy was issued to Fairfield Residential, on October 23, 2015. Based upon this date, the first fiscal analysis shall be conducted ager June 30, 2018. Attachments 1. Locator Map 2. EUC Proposed Amendments: a. Tab 1 -Millenia Sectional Planning Area Plan(SPA) b. Tab 2-Form Based Code(FBC} c. Tab 3-Public Facilities Finance Plan(PFFP) d. Tab 4-Fiscal Impact Analysis (FIA) e. Tab 5-Addendum to the Final Second Tier Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) f. Tab 6-Addendum to the Developer Agreement(DA) MPA17-0005 Page No. 1.9 3. Planning Commission Resolution MPA17-0005; PCM 06-08; FEIR 07-01 4. Draft City Council Ordinance---Approval of the Amended SPA and FBC 5. Draft City Council Resolution—Approval of the Updated PFFP and FIA 6. Draft City Council Resolution—Approval of the Addendum to the FEIR 7. Draft City Council Ordinance—Approval of the Amended DA Prepared by: Stacey Kurz,Project Manager;.Teff Steichen,Associate Planner; Tiffany Allen,Assistant Director of Development Services Department; Eric Crockett, Economic Development Director, and Kelly Broughton, Director of Development Services Department i ATTACHMENT I Project Locator Map Milienia ELIC i BIRCH RD '4 r� � o r r / % % PROJECT LOCATION LOCATOR ■ ■ IiURTI, % MPR 7 7-aD05 ATTACHMENTS 2, 8 and 9 provided on Flash Drive Millenia / EUC ATTACHMENT 3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. MPA17-0005; PCM 06-08; FEIR 07-01 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL: 1) I APPROVE AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE EASTERN URBAN CENTER (EUC) SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA PLAN AND FORM BASED CODE (PC DISTRICT REGULATIONS AND VILLAGE DESIGN PLAN) (MPA 17-0005); 2) APPROVE A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE SUPPLEMENTAL PUBLIC FACILITIES FINANCING PLAN (PFFP) AND UPDATED FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS (FIA); 3) CONSIDER THE ADDENDUM TO FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (FEIR 07-01); AND 4) APPROVE AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the parcel of land which is the subject matter of this Resolution is depicted in Exhibit "A," attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, and for the purpose of general description is located at the southwest corner of Birch Road and Eastlake Parkway,east of the SR 1.25 toll road(Project Site); and i WHEREAS, a duly verified application was filed with the City of Chula Vista by SLF IV/Millenia, LLC (Applicant) requesting amendments to the Eastern Urban Center (EUC) Sectional Planning Area Plan and Form Based Code (PC District Regulations and Village Design. Plan), as well as amendments to the Supplemental Public Facilities Financing Plan(PFFP)and updated Financial Impact Analysis(FIA); and i I WHEREAS, due to the proposed amendment it was further identified that two public benefits identified in the Development Agreement were impacted (job generation and annual net revenue over the cost of providing municipal services), and therefore an amendment to the Development Agreement, recorded on October 27, 2009 as Document No. 2009-0595116 of Official Records in the Office of the San Diego County Recorder, is required; and WHEREAS, the City's Development Services Director has reviewed the Project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and determined that the Project was adequately covered in the previously adopted Final Environmental Impact Report for the Eastern Urban Center (Millenia) Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan, FEIR 07-01. The Development Services Director has determined that only minor technical changes or additions to the FEIR are necessary and that none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines calling for the preparation of a subsequent document have occurred; therefore, the Development Service Director, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, has caused the preparation of an Addendum to the FEIR; and PC Resolution MPA 17-0005;PCM06.08;FEIR07-01 June 13, 201.8 Page 2 WHEREAS, the Development Services Director set the time and place for a Planning Commission hearing on the Project, and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City and its mailing to property owners within 500 feet of the exterior boundaries of the property, at least 10 days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the approval of the Eastern Urban Center (EUC) Sectional Planning Area Plan Form Based Code (PC District Regulations and Village Design Plan)shall be inclusive of staff recommended modifications to the amendment as identified in the staff report and as presented during the public hearing; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held an advertised public hearing on the Project, took public testimony, heard staffs presentation, and thereafter closed the hearing. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission of the City of Chula Vista after hearing public testimony, staffs presentation and after reviewing all of the subject documents, hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the attached Draft City Council Resolutions and Ordinances approving the Project in accordance with the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Chula Vista that a copy of this .Resolution and the draft City Council Resolutions and Ordinances be transmitted to the City Council. Presented by: Approved as to form by: Kelly Broughton, FSALA Glen R, Googins Development Services Director City Attorney PC Resolution MPA17-0005;PCM06-08;FEIR07-01 June 13,2018 Page 3 PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, this 13th day of June 2018, by the following vote, to-wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Gabe Gutierrez, Chairperson ATTEST: Patricia Laughlin, Secretary PC Resolution MPAt7-0005;PCM06-08;FEIR07-01 June 13,20 t 8 Page 4 EXHIBIT A--SITE LOCATION MAP I � 1 r � 1 r r 1 BIRCH RD I � 1 1� 1 1� 1� IQ tg 1 t a F� ► '% Pit ECT LOCATION LOCATOR ► ► HDRTH %% MPA7 74)005 ATTACHMENT 5 RESOLUTION RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL CONSIDERING THE MODIFICATIONS TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL PUBLIC FACILITIES FINANCE PLAN (PFFD) AND FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS (FIA) AND APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE EASTERN URBAN CENTER SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA (SPA) PLAN AND ASSOCIATED REGULATORY DOCUMENTS RELATING TO MODIFICATIONS IN THE OVERALL BUILDOUT INTENSITY, BUILDING HEIGHTS AND DISTRICT 6 REGULATIONS I. RECITALS A. Project Site WHEREAS, the area of land that is the subject of this Resolution is diagrammatically represented in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated into this Resolution, and commonly known as the Eastern Urban Center (EUC), and for the purpose of general description herein consists of 207 acres located adjacent to and east of SR-125, adjacent to and west of Eastlake Parkway, south of Birch Road and the Otay Ranch Town Center, and north of the future extension of Main Street (Project Site); and B. Project; Application for Discretionary Approvals WHEREAS, a duly verified application was filed with the City of Chula Vista Development Services Department on May 24, 2017 by SLF IV-Millenia, LLC (the "Applicant," "Owner" and "Developer") requesting approval of an EUC Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan and Fonn Based Code (FBC) amendment to: 1) establish a maximum land use intensity of 2,983 residential units and 3.115 million square feet of commercial uses and a "target" initial build out of 2,550 and 1.935 million square feet of commercial land uses; 2) revise the Minimum Average Height on six lots from five stories to four stories and modify the minimum height in feet in the Regulating Plan; and 3) revise the Main Street District (District 6) to reduce the amount of non-residential use to a low of 72, target of 120, and high of 120 square feet, further modifying Section 02.04.003 and 02.04.006 of the District Regulations and Design Guidelines and establishing a "height blending" for Districts 6 and 9; and. C. Prior Discretionary Approvals WHEREAS, development of the Project Site has been the subject matter of various entitlements, agreements, and amendments thereto including: 1) a. SPA Plan including Public Facilities Finance Plan, Affordable Housing Program and other regulatory documents approved by City Council Resolution No. 2009-224 on September 15, 2009; and Resolution No. Page 2 2) Planried Community District Regulations approved by City Council Ordinance No. 3142 on October 6, 2009; and 3) SPA Plan Amendment approved by City Council Ordinance No. 3257 and City Council Resolution No. 2013-038 in March 2013; and D. Environmental Detennination WHEREAS, the Director of Development Services has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the project was previously covered in adopted Second-Tier Final Environmental Impact Report, EIR 07-01 (FEIR). The Director of Development Services has determined that only minor technical changes or additions to the FEIR are necessary and that none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines calling for the preparation of a subsequent document have occurred; therefore, the Development Services Director, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, has caused the preparation of an addendum to the FEIR; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the Addendum to the FEIR has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of CEQA, and the Environmental Procedures of the City of Chula Vista; and E. Planning Commission Record of Application WHEREAS, the Director of Development Services set the time and place for a public hearing on the project, and notice of the public hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, and its mailing to property owners within 500 feet of the exterior boundary of the Project Site at least ten (10) days prior to the public hearing; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held an advertised public hearing on June 13, 2018 on the project and voted to adopt Resolution No. MPA17-0005 recommending that the City Council amend the EUC SPA Plan and associated regulatory documents inclusive of the Public Facilities Finance Plan(PFFP)and updated Fiscal Impact Analysis (FIA); and WHEREAS, the proceedings and all evidence introduced before the Planning Commission at the public hearing on the project and the Minutes and Resolution resulting therefrom, are incorporated into the record of this proceeding; and F. City Council Record of Application WHEREAS, the City Clerk set the time and place for a public hearing on the project and notices of said public hearing, together with its purpose given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, and its mailing to property owners within 500 feet of the exterior boundaries of the Project Site at least ten (10) days prior to the public Resolution No. Page 3 hearing; and WHEREAS, the duly noticed and called public hearing on the project was held before the City Council in the Council. Chambers in the City Hall, Chula Vista Civic Center, 276 Fourth Avenue, to receive the recommendations of the Planning Commission, and to hear public testimony with regard to the same. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista hereby finds and determines as follows: II. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH CEQA The City Council finds that, in the exercise of their independent review and judgment, the addendum to the FEIR in the form presented, has been prepared in accordance with requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Review Procedures of the City of Chula Vista and adopts the Addendum to the FEIR. III. APPROVAL OF THE MILLENIA SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA PLAN'S PUBLIC FACILITIES FINANCE PLAN AND FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS The City Council approves the EUC SPA Plan PFFP and FIA as amended and shown in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated into this Resolution subject to the conditions set forth below: 1. Prior to the 30"' day after the accompanying Ordinance becomes effective, the Applicant shall prepare a clean copy of the SPA Plan PFFP and FIA documents by deleting all strike out/underlines and shading. Where the document contains an existing and proposed exhibit, the previous existing exhibit shall be removed and substituted. In addition, the revised text, document format, maps and statistical changes within the EUC SPA PFFP and FIA shall be approved by the Director of Development Services for printing prior to incorporating said revisions into the final document. 2. Prior to the 30th day after the accompanying Ordinance becomes effective, the Applicant shall submit to the Development Services Department 10 copies and a CD of the approved amendment to the EUC SPA Plan PFFP ad FIA. 3. The Applicant shall comply with all the conditions of approval of the Otay Ranch EUC SPA Plan incorporated in Resolution 2009-224 and adopted SPA Plan. IV. CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE OF CONDITIONS If any of the forgoing conditions fail to occur, or if they are, by their terms, to be Resolution No. Page 4 implemented and maintained over time, and any of such conditions fail to be so implemented and maintained according to the their terms, the City shall have the right to revoke or modify all approvals herein granted, deny or further condition issuance of fiiture building permits, deny, revoke or further condition all certificates of occupancy issued under the authority of approvals herein Ranted, instituted and prosecute, litigate or compel their compliance or seek damages for their violations. No vested rights are gained by Applicant or any successor in interest by the City approval of this Resolution. V. INVALIDITY; AUTOMATIC REVOCATION It is the intention of the City Council that its adoption of this Resolution is dependent upon enforceability of each and every term provision and condition herein stated; and that in the event that any one or more terms, provisions or conditions are determined by a. Court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid,illegal or unenforceable, if the City so determines in its sole discretion, this Resolution shall be deemed to be revoked and of no fiirther force or effect ab initio. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council hereby adopts this Resolution approving the Millenia Sectional Planning Area Plan's Public Facilities Finance Plan and Fiscal Impact Analysis in accordance with the findings and subject to the conditions contained herein. Presented by: Approved as to form by: Kelly Broughton, FSALA Glen R. Googins Director of Development Services City Attorney Resolution No. Page 5 PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, this day of by the following vote, to-wit: AYES: Council members: NAYS: Council members: ABSENT: Council members: ABSTAIN: Council members: Mary Casillas Salas, Mayor ATTEST: Kerry Bigelow, City Clerk ATTACHMENT 4 ORDINANCE NO. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE EASTERN URBAN CENTER PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT REGULATIONS AND DESIGN PLAN (FORM BASED CODE) FOR 207 ACRES OF LAND IN THE EASTERN URBAN CENTER PORTION OF THE OTAY RANCH RELATING TO MODIFICATIONS IN THE OVERALL BUILDOUT INTENSITY,BUILDING HEIGHTS AND DISTRICT 6 REGULATIONS I. RECITALS A. Project Site WHEREAS,the area of land that is the subject of this Ordinance is diagrammatically represented in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated into this Ordinance, and cormnonly known as the Eastern Urban Center(EUC),and for the purpose of general description herein consists of 207 acres located adjacent to and east of SR-125, adjacent to and west of Eastlake Parkway, south of Birch Road and the Otay Ranch Town Center, and north of the future extension of Main Street (Project Site); and B. Project; Application for Discretionary Approvals WHEREAS, a duly verified application was filed with the City of Chula Vista Development Services Department on May 24,2017 by SLF IV-Millenia,LLC(the "Applicant," "Owner" and "Developer") requesting approval of an EUC Sectional Planning Area(SPA)Plan and Form Based Code(FBC)amendment to: 1)establish a maximum land use intensity of 2,983 residential units and 3.115 million square feet of commercial uses and a"target"initial build out of 2,550 and 1.935 million square feet of commercial land uses; 2) revise the Minimum Average Height on six lots from five stories to four stories and modify the minimum height in feet in the Regulating Plan; and 3) revise the Main Street District (District 6) to reduce the amount of non-residential use to a low of 72, target of 120, and high of 120 square feet, further modifying Section 02.04.003 and 02.04.006 of the District Regulations and Design Guidelines and establishing a"height blending" for Districts 6 and 9. C. Environmental Determination WHEREAS, the Director of Development Services has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) and has determined that the project was covered in previously adopted Final Second Tier Environmental Impact Report, FEIR 07-01 (FEIR). The Director of Development Services has determined that only minor technical changes or additions to the FEIR are necessary and that none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the State Ordinance No. Page 2 CEQA Guidelines calling for the preparation of a subsequent document have occurred; therefore, the Director of Development Services, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164,has caused the preparation of an addendum to the FEIR; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the Addendum to the FEIR has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of CEQA, and the Environmental Procedures of the City of Chula Vista; and D. Planning Commission Record of Application WHEREAS,the Director of Development Services set the time and place for a public hearing on the project, and notice of the public hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City,and its mailing to property owners within 500 feet of the exterior boundary of the Project Site at least ten (10) days prior to the public hearing; and WHEREAS,the Planning Commission held an advertised public hearing on June 13, 2018 on the project to adopt Resolution MPA17-0005 recommending that the City Council amend the EUC SPA Plan and FBC; and WHEREAS, the proceedings and all evidence introduced before the Planning Commission at the public hearing on the Project and the Minutes and Resolution resulting therefrom, are incorporated into the record of this proceeding; and E. City Council Record of Application WHEREAS, the City Clerk set the time and place for a public hearing on the project and notices of said hearing, together with its purposes given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City,and its mailing to property owners within 500 feet of the exterior boundaries of the Project Site at least ten(10)days prior to the public hearing; and WHEREAS,the duly noticed and called public hearing on the Project was held before the City Council in the Council Chambers in the City Hall,Chula Vista Civic Center, 276 Fourth Avenue,to receive the recoinmendations of the Planning Commission,and to hear public testimony with regard to the same. IT. NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby find, determine and ordain as follows: A. CONSISTENCY WITH GENERAL PLAN The City Council finds that the proposed amendment to the EUC Planned Community District Regulations and Form Based Code are consistent with the City Ordinance No. Page 3 of Chula Vista General Plan. The General Plan envisions the EUC as a vibrant transit-oriented high intensity urban center serving the City and Otay Ranch master plan community. B. APPROVAL OF PROPOSED AMENDMENTS The City Council hereby approves the amendments to the Eastern Urban Center Planned Community District Regulations and Design Guidelines(Form Based Code) as represented in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Ill. EFFECTIVE DATE This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force on the thirtieth day from and after its adoption. Presented by Approved as to form by: Kelly Broughton, FSALA Glen R. Googins Director of Development Services City Attorney Exhibit A and B to be inserted later. ATTACHMENT 6 RESOLUTION RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL CONSIDERING THE ADDENDUM TO EIR 07-01 AND APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE EASTERN URBAN CENTER SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA (SPA) PLAN AND ASSOCIATED REGULATORY DOCUMENTS RELATING TO MODIFICATIONS IN THE OVERALL BUILDOUT INTENSITY, BUILDING HEIGHTS AND DISTRICT 6 REGULATIONS I. RECITALS A. Project Site WHEREAS, the area of land that is the subject of this Resolution is diagrammatically represented in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated into this Resolution, and commonly known as the Eastern Urban Center (EUC), and for the purpose of general description herein consists of 207 acres located adjacent to and east of SR-125, adjacent to and west of Eastlake Parkway, south of Birch Road and the Otay Ranch Town Center, and north of the fiiture extension of Main Street (Project Site); and B. Project; Application for Discretionary Approvals WHEREAS, a duly verified application was filed with the City of Chula Vista. Development Services Department on May 24, 2017 by SLF IV-Millenia, LLC (the "Applicant," "Owner" and "Developer") requesting approval of an EUC Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan and Form Based Code (FBC) amendment to: 1) establish a maximum land use intensity of 2,983 residential units and 3.115 million square feet of commercial uses and a "target" initial build out of 2,550 and 1.935 million square feet of commercial land uses; 2) revise the Minimum Average Height on six lots from five stories to four stories and modify the minimum height in feet in the Regulating Plan; and 3) revise the Main Street District (District 6) to reduce the amount of non-residential use to a low of 72, target of 120, and high of 120 square feet, further modifying Section 02.04.003 and 02.04.006 of the District Regulations and Design Guidelines and establishing a "height blending" for Districts 6 and 9; and C. Prior Discretionary Approvals WHEREAS, development of the Project Site has been the subject matter of various entitlements, agreements, and amendments thereto including: 1) a SPA Plan including Public Facilities Financing Plan, Affordable Housing Program and other regulatory documents approved by City Council Resolution No. 2009-224 on September 15, 2009; and 2) Planned Community District Regulations approved by City Council Ordinance No. 3142 on October 6, 2009; and 3) SPA Plan Amendment approved by City Council Ordinance No. Resolution No. Page 2 3257 and City Council Resolution No. 2013-038 in March 2013; and D. Enviromnental Determination WHEREAS, the Director of Development Services has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the project was previously covered in adopted Second-Tier Final Enviroiunental Impact Report, EIR 07-01 (FEIR). The Director of Development Services has determined that only minor technical changes or additions to the FEIR are necessary and that none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines calling for the preparation of a subsequent document have occurred; therefore, the Development Services Director, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, has caused the preparation of an addendum to the FEIR; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the Addendum to the FEIR has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of CEQA, and the Environmental Procedures of the City of Chula Vista; and E. Planning Commission Record of Application WHEREAS, the Director of Development Services set the time and place for a public hearing on the project, and notice of the public hearing,together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, and its mailing to property owners within 500 feet of the exterior boundary of the Project Site at least ten (10) days prior to the public hearing; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held an advertised public hearing on June 13, 2018 on the project and voted to adopt Resolution No. MPA 17-0005 recommending that the City Council amend the EUC SPA Plan; and WHEREAS, the proceedings and all evidence introduced before the Planning Commission at the public hearing on the project and the Minutes and Resolution resulting therefrom, are incorporated into the record of this proceeding; and F. City Council Record of Application WHEREAS, the City Clerk set the time and place for a public hearing on the project and notices of said public hearing, together with its purpose given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, and its mailing to property owners within 500 feet of the exterior boundaries of the Project Site at least ten (10) days prior to the public hearing; and WHEREAS, the duly noticed and called public hearing on the project was held before the Resolution No. Page 3 City Council in the Council Chambers in the City Hall, Chula Vista Civic Center, 276 Fourth Avenue, to receive the recommendations of the Plamling Conunission, and to hear public testimony with regard to the same. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista hereby finds and determines as follows: Il. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH CEQA The City Council finds that, in the exercise of their independent review and judgment, the addendum to the FEIR in the form presented, has been prepared in accordance with requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Review Procedures of the City of Chula Vista and adopts the Addendum to EIR-07-01. III. SPA FINDINGS A. THE SPA PLAN, AS AMENDED, IS IN CONFORMITY WITH THE OTAY RANCH GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND THE CHULA VISTA GENERAL PLAN AND ITS SEVERAL ELEMENTS. The proposed amendments are consistent with both the City's General Plan and Otay Ranch General Development Plan policies and objectives for the Eastern Urban Center. It is consistent with the GP and GDP goals and vision for the Eastern Urban Center which contemplate a pedestrian/transit-oriented high intensity urban center serving the City and Otay Ranch master plan. While the proposed amendment would reduce the required residential and non- residential buildout for Millenia, the goals and vision of Millenia would be maintained through the continued required compliance with the Design Character and Regulatory Purpose goals of the adopted plan. Projects are still required to be consistent with the applicable district development standards as well as the Character and intent descriptions for the applicable residential districts and the Main Street District. B. THE SPA PLAN, AS AMENDED, WILL PROMOTE THE ORDERLY SEQUENTIALIZED DEVELOPMENT OF THE INVOLVED SECTIONAL PLANNING AREAS. The Eastern Urban Center SPA Plan as amended, will continue to maintain existing provisions and requirements to ensure the orderly, phased development of the project prior to or current with the need for required public facilities. C. THE SPA PLAN, AS AMENDED, WILL NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT ADJACENT LAND USE, RESIDENTIAL ENJOYMENT, CIRCULATION, OR Resolution No. Page 4 ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY. The modifications proposed have no change in existing entitlements for residential use and propose a decrease in non-residential use, and therefore have no impact on surrounding uses outside of Millenia or on public amenities, infrastructure or environmental quality. The proposed reduction in minimum building height from five to four-stories would not have any adverse effects on adjacent land uses in that affected lots would be internal to the project site. In addition, the buildings would be designed in such a way that the reduction in maximum height would not be visually apparent. Proposed modifications to the Main Street District would promote the goal of being a pedestrian-friendly development. IV. APPROVAL OF SPA AMENDMENTS Based on the findings above, the City Council approves the EUC SPA Plan as amended and shown in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated into this Resolution subject to the conditions set forth below: 1. Prior to the 30"' day after the accompanying Ordinance becomes effective, the Applicant shall prepare a clean copy of the SPA Plan document by deleting all strike out/underlines and shading. Where the document contains an existing and proposed exhibit, the previous existing exhibit shall be removed and substituted. In addition, the revised text, document format, maps and statistical changes within the EUC SPA and Form Based Code shall be approved by the Director of Development Services for printing prior to incorporating said revisions into the final document. 2. Prior to the 30th day after the accompanying Ordinance becomes effective, the Applicant shall submit to the Development Services Department 7 hard copies and a CD/flash drive of the approved amendment to the EUC SPA Plan and Planned Community(PC) District Regulations. 3. The Applicant shall comply with all the conditions of approval of the Otay Ranch EUC SPA Plan incorporated in Resolution No. 2009-224 and adopted SPA Plan. V. CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE OF CONDITIONS If any of the forgoing conditions fail to occur, or if they are, by their terms, to be implemented and maintained over time, and any of such conditions fail to be so innplemented and maintained according to the their terms, the City shall have the right to revoke or modify all approvals herein granted, deny or further condition issuance of future building permits, deny, revoke or firrther condition all certificates of occupancy issued under the authority of approvals herein granted, instituted and prosecute, litigate or compel their compliance or seek damages for their violations. No vested rights are gained by Resolution No. Page 5 Applicant or any successor-in interest by the City approval of this Resolution. VI. INVALIDITY; AUTOMATIC REVOCATION It is the intention of the City Council that its adoption of this Resolution is dependent upon enforceability of each and every term provision and condition herein stated; and that in the event that any one or more terms, provisions or conditions are determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, if the City so determines in its sole discretion, this Resolution shall be deemed to be revoked and of no farther force or effect ab initio. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council hereby adopts this Resolution considering the Addendum to the FEIR and approving Amendments to the Eastern Urban Center Sectional Planning Area in accordance with the findings and subject to the conditions contained herein. Presented by: Approved as to form by: Kelly Broughton, FSALA Glen R. Googins Director of Development Services City Attorney Resolution No. Page 6 PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, this_day of by the following vote, to-wit: AYES: Council members: NAYS: Council members: ABSENT: Council members: ABSTAIN: Council members: Mary Casillas Salas, Mayor ATTEST: Kerry Bigelow, City Clerk ATTACHMENT 7 ORDINANCE NO. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND SLF IV —MILLENIA, LLC I. RECITALS A. Project Site WHEREAS,the area of land that is the subject of this Ordinance is diagrammatically represented in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated into this Ordinance, and commonly known as the Eastern Urban Center(EUC),and for the purpose of general description herein consists of 207 acres located adjacent to and east of SR-125, adjacent to and west of Eastlake Parkway, south of Birch Road and the Otay Ranch Town Center, and north of the future extension of Main Street (Project Site); and B. Project; Application for Discretionary Approvals WHEREAS, a duly verified application was filed with the City of Chula Vista Development Services Department on May 24,2017 by SLF IV-Millenia,LLC(the "Applicant," "Owner" and "Developer") requesting approval of an EUC Sectional Planning Area(SPA)Plan and Form Based Code(FBC)amendment to: 1)establish a maximum land use intensity of 2,983 residential units and 3.115 million square feet of commercial uses and a"target"initial build out of 2,550 and 1.935 million square feet of commercial land uses; 2) revise the Minimum Average Height on six lots from five stories to four stories and modify the minimum height in feet in the Regulating Plan; and 3) revise the Main Street District (District 6) to reduce the amount of non-residential use to a low of 72, target of 120, and high of 120 square feet, further modifying Section 02.04.003 and 02.04.006 of the District Regulations and Design Guidelines and establishing a"height blending"for Districts 6 and 9;and WHEREAS, due to proposed amendments in overall commercial square footage there are potential impacts to public benefits including job generation and annual net revenue over the cost of providing municipal services, and therefore require modifications to the Development Agreement between the City of Chula Vista and SLF IV-Millenia, LLC originally entered into September 15, 2009 and recorded on October 27,2009 as Document No. 2009-0595116 of Official Records in the Office of the San Diego County Recorder. C. Environmental Determination WHEREAS, the Director of Development Services has reviewed the proposed Ordinance No. Page 2 project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)and has determined that the project was covered in previously adopted Filial. Second Tier Environmental Impact Report, FEIR 07-01 (FEIR). The Director of Development Services has determined that only minor technical changes or additions to the FEIR are necessary and that none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines calling for the preparation of a subsequent document have occurred; therefore, the Director of Development Services, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, has caused the preparation of an addendum to the FEIR; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the Addendum to the FEIR has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of CEQA, and the Environmental Procedures of the City of Chula Vista; and D. Planning Commission Record of Application WHEREAS,the Director of Development Services set the time and place for a public hearing on the project, and notice of the public hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City,and its mailing to property owners within 500 feet of the exterior boundary of the Project Site at least ten (10) days prior to the public hearing; and WHEREAS,the Planning Commission held an advertised public hearing on June 13, 2018 on the project to adopt Resolution MPA17-0005 recommending that the City Council amend the EUC SPA Plan, FBC, PFFP, FIA and Developer Agreement; and WHEREAS, the proceedings and all evidence introduced before the Planning Commission at the public hearing on the Project and the Minutes and Resolution resulting therefrom, are incorporated into the record of this proceeding; and E. City Council Record of Application WHEREAS, the City Clerk set the time and place for a public hearing on the project and notices of said hearing, together with its purposes given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City,and its mailing to property owners within 500 feet of the exterior boundaries of the Project Site at least ten(10)days prior to the public hearing; and WHEREAS,the duly noticed and called public hearing on the Project was held before the City Council in the Council Chambers in the City Hall,Chula.Vista Civic Center, 276 Fourth Avenue,to receive the recommendations of the Planning Commission,and to hear public testimony with regard to the same. II. NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby find, determine and ordain as follows: Ordinance No. Page 3 A. CONSISTENCY WITH GENERAL PLAN The City Council finds that the proposed amendment to the EUC Planned Community District Regulations and Form Based Code are consistent with the City of Chula Vista General Plan. The General Plan envisions the EUC as a vibrant transit-oriented high intensity urban center serving the City and Otay Ranch master plan community. B. APPROVAL OF PROPOSED AMENDMENTS The City Council hereby approves the First Amendment to the Development Agreement between the City of Chula Vista and SLF IV — Millema, LLC as represented in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 111. EFFECTIVE DATE This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force on the thirtieth day from and after its adoption. Presented by Approved as to form by: Kelly Broughton FSALA Glen R. Googins Director of Development Services City Attorney Exhibit A and B to be inserted later. CHV, L :A VISTA PLANNING, AGENDA STATEME fT ...... ............. ....... ... . .... .. ... . . . ... .. ........ . Item: 3 -- Meeting Date: 6113118 ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing: MPA18-0005; Consideration to add Chapter 19.100 to the Municipal Code to adopt and establish an Urban Agriculture Incentive Zone. SUBMITTED BY: Stacey Kurz, Senior Project Coordinator REVIEWED BY: Kelly Broughton,Director of Development Services INTRODUCTION The State of California passed Assembly Bill 551 (AB551) in 2013 to allow jurisdictions to create Urban Agriculture Incentive Zones (UAIZ). UAIZ's provide a tax incentive (by reducing property taxes) for landowners to use their vacant or blighted property for agricultural purposes for a minimum of five years. This is an effort to use otherwise vacant land, while creating an added benefit for the community. On November 7, 2017, Council authorized staff to initiate the process for UAIZ adoption with the County, whom provides first approval as the tax assessor (see City Council Resolution No. 17-198, Attachment 1). The County approved the Chula Vista UAIZ on May 15, 2018 (see County Board of Supervisors Resolution No. 18-062, Attachment 2). Therefore, staff is bringing documents related to this item back to the Planning Commission and City Council for final approval. City staff has reached out to potentially impacted taxing entities regarding the possible effects of the UAIZ and has received no substantial questions, comment or concerns from these parties. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Director of Development Services has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) and has determined that the proposed activity is not a "Project" as defined under Section 15378.of the state CEQA Guidelines because the activity is voluntary and does not involve any commitment to any specific project that may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment. Therefore, pursuant to Section 15060(c)'(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Thus, no environmental review is required. Although environmental review is not required at this time, MPA17-0005 Page No. 2 once the scope of potential individual projects has been defined, environmental review will be required for each project and the appropriate environmental determination will be made. RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. MPA18-0005 (see Planning Commission Resolution, Attachment 3), recommending that the Chula Vista City Council (Council)approve: 1) An Ordinance to add Chapter 19.100 to the Municipal Code and establish an Urban Agriculture Incentive Zone. DISCUSSION On January 5, 2016, the Chula Vista City Council adopted the first Healthy Chula Vista Action Plan to establish a set of strategies to review, create and evaluate policies and programs within the City and to develop key community partnerships to promote wellness within our community. A key component of the plan included residents' access to healthy food options. Consistent with the adopted Healthy Chula Vista Action Pian and its strategies, staff is recommending the adoption of an Urban Agriculture Incentive Zone (UAIZ) within Chula Vista as allowed by AB551. AB551 identifies eligible properties as: • Vacant,blighted, or otherwise unimproved properties: o Vacant is defined as a parcel with some form of improvement such as a slab, but with no structures. o Unimproved is defined as an empty parcel with no form of improvements on it. a Blighted is defined by California Health and Safety Code Section 33030. • At least 0.1 acre in size and no larger than 3 acres (between 4,355 and 130,680 square feet). • Must enter into contract with the City for a minimum of five (5) years to dedicate the entire property for agricultural use, free of any dwellings and only have physical structures that support the agricultural use of the site: o Allowed structures include, but are not limited to, toolsheds, greenhouses, produce stands, and instructional space. Over 150 properties within Chula Vista were identified as being eligible. While properties may have been identified due to their current eligibility meeting the acreage requirements and by not having current improvements (e.g. structures), the City expects far less properties will voluntarily participate due to pending development plans, Rather than paying the standard applicable property tax rate (e.g. commercial tax rate for a commercial property), participating properties will be assessed at the lowest of three values; the value based on the average per-acre value of irrigated cropland in California, the current fair market value or the factored base year value (Proposition 13 value). If this is less than the MPA17-0005 Page No.3 current assessed value of the land, then the owner will pay lower property taxes for the period of the contract. An analysis was conducted as part of the County approval process to identify all potentially impacted taxing entities and identified that if all City properties were to participate the projected cost to all taxing entities would be between $345,000 to $395,000 annually. An analysis would be conducted on each participating parcel at time of application, with notification to the affected entities. To establish the UAIZ for Chula Vista a Draft Ordinance was presented to the County Board of Supervisors in substantial form. Since County approval, minor changes have been included to reduce barriers related to agricultural use in specific residential zones, specifically adding section 19.100.060(B)(2). No other substantive changes were made (see CVMC 19.100 UAIZ Program, Attachment 4). Once the UAIZ is effective, interested landowners must enter into a contract with the City and will have 60 days to initiate the agricultural use on the property (see Sample UAIZ Property Contract,Attachment 6). Currently contracts can be entered into up until January 1, 2029, the sunset date of the State law. If the property owner breaches their contract they will have to pay back the taxes the incentive granted them. DECISION MAKER CONFLICTS Staff has reviewed the property holdings of the Planning Commission and has found no property holdings within 500 feet of the boundaries of the property which is the subject to this action. Staff is not independently aware, nor has staff been informed by any Planning Commission member, of any other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision-maker conflict of interest in this matter. CURRENT YEAR FISCAL Staff costs associated with the preparation of this staff report and for the UAIZ adoption process are offset by grant funds through the Centers for Disease Control's Racial and Ethnic Approaches to Community Health(REACH Chula Vista). ONGOING FISCAL Potential ongoing impacts were assessed by the County and any taxing agencies possibly affected by the adoption of the UAIZ were notified of the May 15th County public hearing. Specific to the city the following funds and total impact if all properties entered into a UAIZ could be impacted annually. City Fund Current Tax Projected Tax with UAIZ Loss due to UAIZ General Fund $20,286 $3,557 ($16,729) Otay Ranch No. 1 $771 $555 ($216) District No. 1 $40,750 $38,062 ($2,688) Bayfront Redevelopment Project - - ($61,590) MPA17-0005 Page No. 4 Merged Redevelopment(AB1290) - - ($33,597) Otay Valley Rd. Redevelopment - ($4,809) Southwest Redevelopment Project - - ($104,238) TOTAL POTENTIAL IMPACT ($223,967) Redevelopment areas are impacted first before other taxing entities and therefore could be impacted more significantly by a property utilizing the UAIZ program. Staff expects far less properties will voluntarily participate, particularly in redevelopment areas due to pending development plans. ATTACHMENTS 1. City Council Resolution No. 2017-198 2. County Board of Supervisors Resolution No. 18-052 3. Planning Commission Resolution 4. CVMC 19.100 UAIZ Program Prepared by: Stacey Kurz, Senior Project Coordinator, Development Services Department ATTACHMENT I RESOLUTION NO. 2017-198 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AUTHORIZING STAFF TO SUBMIT REQUIRED DOCUMENTATION TO THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO TO INITIATE THE ADOPTION PROCESS OF AN URBAN AGRICULTURE INCENTIVE ZONE WHEREAS,jurisdictions are becoming increasingly aware that cities play a critical role in supporting the health and well-being of their communities; and WHEREAS, the Healthy Chula Vista Action Plan adopted January 5, 2016 included strategies to increase local food production and encourage urban agriculture within the City of Chula Vista; and WHEREAS, Assembly Bill 551 passed in 2013 and recently amended in September 2017, allows jurisdictions to adopt an Urban Agriculture Incentive Zone ("UAIZ") for eligible landowners to enter into contract to use their otherwise "unused"property for agricultural use for a minimum of five years in exchange for a reduction in property tax; and WHEREAS, the first step in the adoption of an UAIZ is approval by the County of San Diego, in its role as the tax assessor and collector. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, that it authorizes staff to submit required documentation to the County of San Diego to initiate the adoption process of an Urban Agriculture Incentive Zone in Chula Vista. PresenKd by Approved as to form by Kelly . B ughton, FASLA Gen R. Goo s Director of Development Services Cit to Resolution No. 2017-198 Page No. 2 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, California, this 7th day of November 2017 by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers: Aguilar, Diaz, McCann, and Salas NAYS: Councilmembers: None ABSENT: Councilmembers: Padilla ;a� Mary Seas, Mayor ATTEST: Kerry WBigeloA MMC, City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) CITY OF CHULA VISTA ) I, Kerry K. Bigelow, City Clerk of Chula Vista, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2017-198 was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting of the Chula Vista City Council held on the 7th day of November 2017. Executed this 7th day of November 2017. Kerry K. lUelow, MMC, City Clerk I ATTACHMENT 2 Resolution No. 18-062 Meeting Date: 05/l5/l8 (l7) RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO REGARDING URBAN AGRICULTURE INCENTIVE ZONES |NTHE CITY OFCHULAVISTA WHEREAS, California Assembly Bill 551 (Urban Agriculture Incentive Zones Act)added Chapter 6.3' commencing with Section 51040. to Part 1 of Division 1 ofTitle 5 ofthe California Government Code, amended Section 402.1 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code, and added Section 422.7 to the California Revenue and Taxation Code; and WHEREAS, the Urban Agriculture Incentive Zones Act iaintended topromote oma||eno|e agriculture onvacant, unimproved, or blighted lands in urban areas; and WHEREAS, the Urban Agriculture Incentive Zones Act authorizes, under specified conditions and until January 1, 2029, the City and a landowner to enter into a contract to enforceably restrict the use of vacant, unimproved, or otherwise blighted lands for small-scale agricultural use in urban areas, provided the contract is for a term of no less than five years and the property is at least 0.10 acre and not more than three acres insize; and VVHEREAS, inexchange for the property owner restricting property for urban aQhcu|buma and entering into o contract pursuant bnthe Urban Agriculture Incentive Zones Act, the San Diego County Assessor(County Assessor) is required to value the restricted property at the lowest of three values; the value based on the average per-acre value of irrigated cropland in California, the current fair market va|ua, o/the factored baso year value(Proposition 13 value); and WHEREAS, pursuant tothe Urban Agriculture Incentive Zones Act, property owners that breach the contract or terminate the contract prior to its expiration are obligated to pay a fee equal to the tax benefit they received; and WHEREAS, pursuant tothe Urban Agriculture Incentive Zones Act, no Urban Agriculture Incentive Zone may be established in any area that iscurrently subject to, or has been subject towithin the previous three yoanu, e contract pursuant to Cal. Gov't Code sections 51200 to 51297.4(Williamson Act); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Urban Agriculture Incentive Zones Act, the establishment of an Urban Agriculture Incentive Zone within the City of Chula Vista is subject to approval by the County Board of Supervisors; NOW, THEREFORE, |T|8HEREBY RESOLVED THAT On this doba. the Board of Supervisors held e noticed public hearing; and 1. This Board of Supervisors approves the City of Chula Vista's request to establish an Urban Agriculture Incentive Zone in the City ofChula Vista, upon the request by and voluntary agreement ofowners of such pnoperties, in compliance with the |aws, rules and regulations applicable hosuch program. 2. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. APPROVED ASTOFORM AND LEGALITY COUNTY COUNSEL By: Rachel H. Witt, Senior Deputy ON MOTION of Supervisor Roberts, seconded by Supervisor Horn, the above Resolution was passed and adopted by the Board of Supervisors, County of San Diego, State of California, on this 15th day of May, 2018, by the following vote: AYES: Cox, Jacob, Roberts,Horn ABSENT: Gaspar STATE OF CALIFORNIA) County of San Diego)ss I hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of the Original Resolution entered in the Minutes of the Board of Supervisors. DAVID HALL Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Qo of S U P'st By: �aaKrr p. Chrystal' iguez, Deputy N nre&r co CaUNT"f Resolution No. 18-062 Meeting Date: 05/15/18 (17) ATTACHMENT 3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-0005 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL: ADD CHAPTER 19.100 TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADOPT AND ESTABLISH AN URBAN AGRICULTURE INCENTIVE ZONE WHEREAS, California Assembly Bill 551 ("Urban Agriculture Incentive Zones Act") added Chapter 6.3, commencing with 51040, to Part 1 of Division 1 of Title 5 of the California Government Code, amended 402.1 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code, and added 422.7 to the California Revenue and Taxation Code; and WHEREAS, the Urban Agriculture Incentive Zones Act ("UAIZ") is intended to promote small scale agriculture on vacant, unimproved, or blighted lands in urban areas; and WHEREAS, the City of Chula Vista ("City") has existing land use zoning regulations pertaining to small-scale agriculture; and WHEREAS,the Urban Agriculture Incentive Zones Act authorizes,under specified conditions and until January 1, 2029 (or to a time otherwise provided for by the State), the City and a property owner to enter into a contract to restrict the property owner's use of their vacant, unimproved, or otherwise blighted lands for small-scale agricultural use in urban areas, provided the contract is for a term of no less than five years and the property is at least 0.10 acre and not more than three acres in size; and WHEREAS, in exchange for the property owner restricting their property for urban agriculture and entering into a contract pursuant to the Urban Agriculture Incentive Zones Act,the San Diego County Assessor("County Assessor")is required to value the restricted property at the lowest of three values: the value based on the average per-acre value of irrigated cropland in California, the current fair market value, or the factored base year value (Proposition 13 value); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Urban Agriculture Incentive Zones Act, property owners who breach the contract or terminate the contract prior to its expiration are obligated to pay a fee equal to the tax benefit they received; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Urban Agriculture Incentive Zones Act, no Urban Agriculture Incentive Zone may be established in any area that is currently subject to, or has been subject to, within the previous three years, a contract pursuant to California Government Code sections 51200 to 51297.4 (the "Williamson Act"); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Urban Agriculture Incentive Zones Act, the establishment of an Urban Agriculture Incentive Zone within the City of Chula Vista is PC Resolution UAIZ June13,2018 Page 2 subject to approval by the County Board of Supervisors which was adopted by Resolution No. 18-062 on May 15, 2018; and WHEREAS, the City's Development Services Director has reviewed the Project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and determined that the proposed activity is not a "Project" as defined under Section 15378 of the state CEQA Guidelines because the activity is voluntaiy and does not involve any commitment to any specific project that may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment. Therefore,pursuant to Section 15060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines,the activity is not subject to CEQA. Thus, no environmental review is required. Although environmental review is not required at this time, once the scope of potential individual projects has been defined, environmental review will be required for each project and the appropriate environmental determination will be made.; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held an advertised public hearing on the Project,took public testimony,heard staffs presentation, and thereafter closed the hearing. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Plaiming Commission of the City of Chula Vista and after hearing public testimony, staff's presentation and after reviewing all of the subject documents, hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the attached Draft City Council Ordinance approving the Project in accordance with the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Plamling Commission of the City of Chula Vista that a copy of this Resolution and the draft City Council Ordinance be transmitted to the City Council. SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS PC Resolution UAIZ June 13,2018 Page 3 Presented by: Approved as to form by: Kelly Broughton, FSALA Glen R. Googins Development Services Director City Attorney PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, this 13th day of June 2018, by the following vote, to-wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Gabe Gutierrez, Chairperson ATTEST: Patricia Laughlin, Secretary ATTACHMENT 4 ORDINANCE NO. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA TO ADD CHAPTER 19.100 TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADOPT AND ESTABLISH AN URBAN AGRICULTURE INCENTIVE ZONE WHEREAS, California Assembly Bill 551 ("Urban Agriculture Incentive Zones Act") added Chapter 6.3, commencing with 51040, to Part 1 of Division 1 of Title 5 of the California Government Code, amended 402.1 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code, and added 422.7 to the California Revenue and Taxation Code; and WHEREAS, the Urban Agriculture Incentive Zones Act is intended to promote small scale agriculture on vacant, unimproved, or blighted lands in urban areas; and WHEREAS, the City of Chula Vista ("City") has existing land use zoning regulations pertaining to small-scale agriculture; and WHEREAS, the Urban Agriculture Incentive Zones Act authorizes, under specified conditions and until January 1, 2029 (or to a time otherwise provided for by the State), the City and a property owner to enter into a contract to restrict the property owner's use of their vacant, unimproved, or otherwise blighted lands for small-scale agricultural use in urban areas, provided the contract is for a term of no less than five years and the property is at least 0.10 acre and not more than three acres in size; and WHEREAS, in exchange for the property owner restricting their property for urban agriculture and entering into a contract pursuant to the Urban Agriculture Incentive Zones Act, the San Diego County Assessor ("County Assessor") is required to value the restricted property at the lowest of three values: the value based on the average per-acre value of irrigated cropland in California, the current fair market value, or the factored base year value (Proposition 13 value); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Urban Agriculture Incentive Zones Act, property owners who breach the contract or terminate the contract prior to its expiration are obligated to pay a fee equal to the tax benefit they received; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Urban Agriculture Incentive Zones Act, no Urban Agriculture Incentive Zone may be established in any area that is currently subject to, or has been subject to, within the previous three years, a contract pursuant to California Government Code sections 51200 to 51297.4 (the "Williamson Act"); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Urban Agriculture Incentive Zones Act, the establishment of an Urban Agriculture Incentive Zone within the City of Chula Vista is subject to approval by the County Board of Supervisors, which was approved by County Resolution No. 18-062 on May 15, 2018; and Ordinance Page 2 WHEREAS, on June 13, 2018 the City of Chula Vista Planning Commission held a public hearing and recommended by a vote of X-X that City Council adopt the ordinance (CVMC 19.100) to establish an Urban Agriculture Incentive Zone by Resolution No. MPA 18- 0005. NOW THEREFORE the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does ordain as follows: Section I. Chapter 19.100 is hereby added to the Chula Vista Municipal Code as follows: Chapter 19.100 URBAN AGRICULTURE INCENTIVE ZONE PROGRAM Sections: 19.100.010 Title. 19.100.020 Purpose. 19.100.030 Urban Agriculture Incentive Zone ("UAIZ") Established. 19.100.040 UAIZ Contract Required. 19.100.050 UAIZ Property. 19.100.060 Agricultural Uses. 19.100.070 County Assessor. 19.100.080 Agricultural Use Commencement. 19.100.090 Pesticides and Fertilizers-Restrictions. 19.100.100 Annual Inspection for Conformance. 19.100.110 Cancellation of UAIZ Contract with City. 19.100.120 Fees. 19.100.130 hnplementation Date. 19.100.140 Limitation on Entry of UAIZ Contracts. 19.100.150 Additional Requirements CHAPTER 19.100 19.100.010 Title. This chapter shall be known as the City of Chula Vista Urban Agriculture Incentive Zone Program and may be referred to as the UAIZ Program. Ordinance Page 3 19.100.020 Purpose. The purpose of the City of Chula Vista Urban Agricultural Incentive Zone Program is to implement AB 551, as described in section 51040, et seq., of the California Government Code and known as the Urban Agriculture Incentive Zones Act, to promote and foster urban agriculture. The UAIZ Program is designed to increase access to healthy food by providing an incentive for property owners of eligible vacant or unimproved properties within the City of Chula Vista to utilize these properties for small-scale agricultural uses. The property owners of eligible properties may voluntarily enter into agreements with the City to participate in the UAIZ Program (to promote urban agriculture enterprises) in exchange for potential reduced property tax assessments under section 422.7 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code. 19.100.030 Urban Agriculture Incentive Zone Established. In accordance with Urban Agricultural Incentive Zones Act, as set forth in AB 551 and which may be amended from time to time by the State Legislature, an Urban Agriculture Incentive Zone is hereby established in the City of Chula Vista. The Urban Agriculture Incentive Zone shall consist of all urban areas, as defined in Government Code sections 51040.3(a) and 51040.3(b), within the City of Chula Vista except those lands that are currently subject to, or have been subject to within the three years immediately preceding the effective date of this Ordinance, a contract pursuant to the Williamson Act. The boundaries of the Urban Agriculture Incentive Zone shall be coterminous with the boundaries of the City of Chula Vista. 19.100.040 UAIZ Contract Required. Pursuant to the Urban Agricultural Incentive Zones Act, the City and any property owners within the Urban Agriculture Incentive Zone may enter into an enforceable contract,under terms and conditions required by the City Manager or City Attorney, including terms and conditions to ensure compliance with Section 19.100.060(B), to restrict the use of eligible property to small- scale agriculture uses for an initial term of not less than five years, and which may be extended at the discretion of the City Manager ("UAIZ Contract"). The executed UAIZ Contract and any attendant attachments shall be recorded by the property owner with the County Recorder, with copies of the recorded documents to be provided to the City Manager within two business days of the recordation. 19.100.050 UAIZ Property. Property eligible to enter into an UAIZ Contract shall consist of the following: 1. The property must be vacant or unimproved. The property may not contain any habitable dwellings, but may contain only non-habitable structures that are or will be accessory to agricultural uses, such as a toolshed, greenhouse, produce stand, or instructional facility as approved by the City Manager or their designee; and 2. The property is located within a Census-designated urbanized area, as defined in the AB 551, so long as it is not wholly or partially within a National Recreation Area, Significant Ecological Area, or Sensitive Environmental Resource Area; and 3. The property in its entirety shall be available for and dedicated to agricultural uses immediately and for the duration of the contract and which shall be for a term of five (5) years, which may be renewed at the discretion of the City Manager; and Ordinance Page 4 4. The property shall be a minimum of one-tenth (0.10) of an acre and a maximum of three (3) acres; and 5. Secured property tax obligations shall be current and paid according to installments determined by State law. 6. All structures are subject to the provisions in CVMC 19.58.020. 19.100.060 Agricultural Uses A. Agricultural Use Defined. Subject to paragraph B (below), agricultural use(s) shall mean farming in all its branches including, but not limited to the cultivation and tillage of soil, the production, cultivation, growing, and harvesting of any agricultural or horticultural products, the raising of livestock, bees, fur-bearing animals, dairy-producing animals,poultry, agricultural education, the sale of produce through field retail stands or farm stands as defined by Article 5 (commencing with Section 47030) of Chapter 10.5 of Division 17 of the Food and Agriculture Code, and any practices performed by a farmer or on farm as incidental to or in conjunction with farm operations. The term"agricultural use"does not include timber production. The production, cultivation, growing, and harvesting of marijuana shall be prohibited in the UAIZ. B. Zoning and Municipal Code limitations on Agricultural Uses /) UAIZ. 1. Neither the creation of the Urban Agricultural Incentive Zone nor the execution of any UAIZ Contract shall in any way expand the allowable uses of any property under the City's existing land use zoning regulations or ordinances. Eligible land uses under the UAIZ Program may include any agricultural land uses that are permitted or conditionally permitted, but are subject to limitations set forth in this chapter, by AB 551, by the Chula Vista Municipal Code, including, but not limited to, Title 6 [Animals] and Chapter 19.20 [Agricultural Zone], or by the terms and conditions set forth in the UAIZ Contract. Conditional Use Permits may be required by the City Manager. 2. Chula Vista Municipal Code section 19.16.030 provides that lot sizes may not be less than one acre for crop and tree farming, as defined in Chapter 19.16. Notwithstanding the aforementioned one acre limitation, a lot size may be less than one (1) acre, but not less than .10 of an acre, when a UAIZ Contract is entered into pursuant to section 19.100.040 of this chapter. 19.100.070 County Assessor. Pursuant to the Urban Agricultural Incentive Zones Act, upon recordation of a UAIZ Contract, the County Assessor is required to value the restricted property at the lowest of three values: the value based on the average per-acre value of irrigated cropland in California as reported by the National Agricultural Statistics Service of the United States Department of Agriculture, the current fair market value, or the factored base year value (Proposition 13 value). 19.100.080 Agricultural Use Commencement and Continuation For Duration of UAIZ Contract. Agricultural use must commence on the property within sixty (60) days after the recordation of the UAIZ Contract. Pursuant to the Urban Agricultural Incentive Zones Act, the entirety of the property subject to a UAIZ Contract shall be dedicated to agricultural uses and such agricultural uses shall continue for the duration of the UAIZ Contract. Ordinance Page 5 19.100.090 Pesticides and Fertilizers-Restrictions. Pursuant to the Urban Agricultural Incentive Zones Act, only pesticides or fertilizers sanctioned by the U.S. Department of Agriculture's National Organic Program may be used on the property that is subject to the UAIZ Contract. 19.100.100 Annual Inspection for Conformance. The City Manager may conduct a site inspection to verify the property owner's conformance to the terms of the UAIZ Contract, including, but not limited to an initial inspection within 90 days of the execution of a UAIZ Contract, every year after the execution of the UAIZ Contract, or as otherwise determined necessary by the City Manager. 19.100.110 Cancellation of an UAIZ Contract with the City. A. Circumstances to Cancel UAIZ Contract. Circumstances for cancelling a UAIZ Contract with the City shall include the following: 1. City-Initiated Cancellation for Noncompliance. If the City Manager finds that the property does not conform to the terms of the UAIZ Contract or the property owner does not permit a site inspection as set forth in section 19.100.100, the City Manager shall provide notice to the property owner of said non-compliance and a date by which to bring the property into compliance with the UAIZ Contract or to permit an inspection pursuant to section 19.100.100. Should the property owner fail to comply with the corrective actions required by the City Manager within a time period set forth by City Manager, then notice of cancellation shall be provided to the property owner, personally or by mail, that the UAIZ Contract will be cancelled fifteen (15) calendar days after personal service or mailing of the notice. At the end of the fifteen(15) days, if the property owner has not brought the property into compliance with the terms of the UAIZ Contact or permitted an inspection pursuant to section 19.100.100, the City Manager shall execute a cancellation document and record it with the Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk and notify the County Assessor. 2. Property Owner-Initiated Cancellation. If the property owner submits a request to the City Manager to cancel a recorded UAIZ Contract, the City Manager will execute a cancellation document with the property owner, which the City Manager will record with the Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk and notify the County Assessor. B. Effect of Cancellation—Fee and Tax Rate. Pursuant to Govermnent Code section 51042(a)(2)(B), the City shall impose a fee equal to the cumulative value of the tax benefit received during the duration of the UAIZ Contract upon the property owner for cancellation of any UAIZ Contract prior to the expiration of that contract, unless the City Council makes a determination that the cancellation was caused by extenuating circumstances despite the good faith effort by the property owner. The property also shall be re-assessed to its previous non-agricultural tax rate by the County Assessor following recordation of the cancellation document. 19.100.120 Fees. A property owner may be subject to a fee payable to the City for the implementation, administration, and monitoring of the UAIZ Contract and its terms. Said fees shall be promulgated in accordance to the City's Master Fee Schedule processes. Ordinance Page 6 19.100.130 Implementation Date. The Urban Agriculture Incentive Zone Program shall not be effective until the County of San Diego has approved the City of Chula Vista participation the UAIZ Program as required by AB 551. 19.100.140 Limitation on entry of UAIZ Contracts. Unless extended by State law, no UAIZ Contract for property within the City's UAIZ shall be renewed or created after January 1, 2029. However, any UAIZ Contract entered into pursuant to this Chapter on or before January 1, 2029,to the extent allowed by law, shall be valid and enforceable for the duration of the UAIZ Contract. 19.100.150 Additional Requirements. A property owner who enters into a UAIZ Contract and the property subject to a UAIZ Contract are subject to additional regulations as determined by the Chula Vista Municipal Code, by the County of San Diego, or by the State Legislature. Section II. Severability If any portion of this Ordinance, or its application to any person or circumstance, is for any reason held to be invalid, unenforceable or unconstitutional, by a court of competent jurisdiction, that portion shall be deemed severable, and such invalidity, unenforceability or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining portions of the Ordinance, or its application to any other person or circumstance. The City Council of the City of Chula Vista hereby declares that it would have adopted each section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance, irrespective of the fact that any one or more other sections, sentences, clauses or phrases of the Ordinance be declared invalid, unenforceable or unconstitutional. Section III. Construction The City Council of the City of Chula Vista intends this Ordinance to supplement, not to duplicate or contradict, applicable state and federal law and this Ordinance shall be construed in light of that intent. Section IV. Effective Date This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force on the thirtieth day after its final passage. Section V. Publication The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published or posted according to law. Presented by Approved as to form by Kelly G. Broughton, FASLA Glen R. Googins Director of Development Services City Attorney CHULA VISTA ^1 PLANNING + COMMISSION AGENDA STATEMENT Item: 4 Meeting Date: 06/13/1 ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing: Consideration of Design Review Permit DR17-0039 to redevelop the site at 201 Third Avenue with a 5-story mixed use project Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Chula Vista approving Design Review Permit DR17-0039 to redevelop the site at 201 � Third Avenue with a 5-story, 23-unit residential apartment building with € 2,561 square-feet of commercial space, 20 on-site and 22 off-site parking spaces, landscaped areas, and recreational open space, subject to the conditions contained herein i SUBMITTED BY: Miguel Z. Tapia, AICP, Senior Planner REVIEWED BY: Kelly Broughton, Director of Development Services INTRODUCTION The Applicant, Tierra del Sol Investments, has submitted an application for a Design Review Permit for the redevelopment of the 11,504-square foot lot located at 201 Third Avenue (Site) with a mixed use (residential/fommercial) project. The Site, currently vacant, is at the southeast corner of Third Avenue and E Street in the Downtown Area (see Attachment 1, Locator Map). The Site is located within the V-3 West Village District of the Urban Core Specific Plan area. This land use district allows the construction of residential/commercial projects such as the proposed project, subject to approval of a design review permit by the Planning Commission. The project has been reviewed and evaluated by City staff and it is being presented to the Planning Commission for consideration and approval. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Development Services Director has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQ,A) and has determined that the proposed project was adequately covered in the previously adopted Final Environmental Impact Report FEIR 06-01 prepared for the Chula Vista Urban Core and certified by the City Council in May 2007. Planning Commission June 13,2418 Page-2 RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission approve the Design Review Permit resolution subject to the attached conditions. DISCUSSION: Pro'ect Site Characteristics: The 11,500 square-foot (0.25 acres) Site consists of a single lot, formerly occupied by a service station that was removed and all structures demolished in the late 1980's. The Site is located at the southeast corner of Third Avenue and E Street within Chula Vista's Downtown District. East of the Site is an alley that runs parallel to Third Avenue and provides one-way vehicular circulation going south between E Street and Davidson Street. The Site is located within the V-3 West Village District of the Urban Core Specific Plan, The Site is mostly surrounded by commercial uses and medical/professional offices; residential uses are further to the east of Church Avenue and north of E Street, Bus Route 929 runs along Third Avenue and Bus Route 705 runs along E Street, with several bus stops within walking distance to the project, The Site 3 is also located within the Downtown Parking District, which extends from E Street to H Street along Del Mar Avenue and Garret Avenue. i i Project Description E The proposed project consists of the construction of a 5-story structure (approximately 50 feet in height) with 23 apartments located on the upper four floors, a 20-space private parking lot on the first floor (below the main building structure), and 2,551 square-feet of retail space on the first floor fronting on Third Avenue and E Street. The project also includes landscaped areas i with a variety of soft and hardscape materials primarily located on the first and fifth floors of the building structure. Recreational open space (approximately 5,100 sq. ft. in total) is located i on all the floors of the structure and includes a plaza, private decks and lounges, balconies and a roof deck on the fifth floor with views to the coast (see Attachment 2, Concept Plans). The residential apartments consist of 10 one-bedroom units, 12 two-bedroom units, and 1 three- I bedroom unit. Access to and from the project is via the one-way, south-bound alley and E ` Street. Project Architecture The proposed project architecture features an Art Moderne and Art Deco architectural design that exemplifies and contributes to the dynamic revitalization and vibrancy of the Third Avenue Village. The building design incorporates a variety of structural and surface elements such as diagonal pattern of framing members (chevron patterning) with horizontal and vertical accents. The building facades include a variety of building materials and colors, including cement plaster, concrete, metal railings, aluminum siding, and others. The overall design, form and scale of the Planning Commission June ]3,2018 Page-3 building fit within the guidelines of the Urban Core Specific Plan's Village District and set a strong precedent for future development planned for downtown Chula Vista. Land Use and Zoning The table below shows the current, General Plan, and zoning designations for the subject Site and the surrounding sites: Current Use General Plan UCSP(Zoning) Site Vacant Lot Mixed Use Residential V3 West Village North E Street/Bank Mixed Use Residential V3 West Village East Alley/Medical Office Mixed Use Residential V3 West Village South Retail Commercial Mixed Use Residential V3 West Village West Third Av/Auto Shap Mixed Use Residential V3.West Village e 4 Parkin The proposed project is located within the Urban Core Specific Plan, as well as the Downtown Parking District. The Urban Core Specific Plan requires residential/commercial projects to provide 1.5 parking spaces per residential unit plus 1 guest parking space for every 10 units; it also requires 2 spaces per 1,000 square feet of commercial space. This requires the subject project to provide 37 residential and 5 commercial parking spaces. The Urban Core Specific Plan also allows projects to provide 50% of the required residential parking on-site, while the rest of the residential parking can be provided off-site in private and/or public .parking lots within 500 feet of Project Site. The Downtown Parking District also offers the option to pay an In-Lieu-Fee for each of the spaces not provided on site. The proposed project includes 20 parking spaces to be located on the ground floor, beneath the building structure. For the other I 22 parking spaces, the applicant proposes to pay the In-Lieu Parking Fee allowed within the J Parking District and the Urban Core Specific Plan. The fee will contribute to the Parking District for future parking improvements. f E In order to determine if there is sufficient parking in the nearby public parking lots to serve the demands of the subject .project, a parking analysis was conducted in lune 2017 by the engineering firm of Chen Ryan, as part of the development of the subject project and the project at 230 Church Avenue. The analysis conducted a series of parking occupancy counts at the nearby public parking lots located within 500 feet from the proposed project sites (Public Parking Lots 1, 2, 3, 10 and 11). Based on the observed parking occupancy counts and the I anticipated parking demand of the proposed projects, the analysis concluded that the public parking located within the public parking lots in the vicinity of the projects would be able to accommodate the off-site parking demand (see copy of parking study included as Attachment #3). Planning Commission June 13,2018 Page-4 Consistency with Development Standards The proposed residential/commercial project has been evaluated using the Urban Core Specific Plan's development standards and regulations. Following is a table that shows the required standards of the zone and the proposed project features: Development Standard V3 West Village Zoning Project Proposal Building Height 18 ft. Min.; 84 ft. Max. 60 feet Building Setbacks: West (Front): 0 feet 0 Feet North Side: 0 feet 0 Feet l South Side: 0 Feet 0 Feet East (Rear): 0 Feet 0 Feet Floor Area Ratio (FAR): 4,5 Max. 3.2 Street Wall Frontage: 50%Min. 60-90% Parking Required: 42 spaces 20 on-site; 22 off-site Open Space Required: 4,600 sq. sf. 5,108 sq. ft. ANALYSIS: I 'r The proposed residential/commercial project was reviewed and evaluated based on the regulations, development standards, and design guidelines listed in the V3 West Village District of the Urban Core Specific Plan, Following is the analysis of the project based on the applicable policies. F Land Use The proposed project is consistent with the vision, objectives and policies of the General Plan and the development standards and design guidelines of the Urban Core Specific Plan. The project would redevelop a vacant lot and provide additional residential units and retail services within the City's Downtown area with convenient access to public transit. Easy accessibility to public transit would contribute to connect the project residents with other parts of the City and i the region. The project will provide multi-family housing to residents who would make use of ' and support the local commercial businesses. The proposed project is also consistent with the development regulations related to land use, building height, Floor Area Ratio, building setbacks, building wall frontage, parking, and landscaping and open space, As shown in the table above,the project meets all of the regulations of the Urban Core Specific Plan. Site Planning and Building Placement/Orientation/Building Architecture The Fallowing is a set of design standards related to Site Planning, Building Placement and Building Architecture applicable to the proposed project followed by a statement indicating Planning Commission .lune 13,2018 Pagc-5 how the project is consistent with those guidelines. Site Planning "New infill buildings should reinforce the pedestrian-orientation of the Village by providing storefronts next to the sidewalk and locating parking areas away from the street." "Create continuous pedestrian activity along public sidewalks in an uninterrupted sequence by minimizing gaps between buildings." "Parking lots should be located to the rear of buildings, subterranean, or in parking structures" and "Locate rear parking lot and structure entries on side streets or alleys in order to minimize pedestrian/vehicular conflicts." l The project's 5-story building structure, with four floors of residential units and retail space fronting on Third Avenue and E Street, is efficiently placed along the property lines to be oriented to the streets and encourage pedestrian activity, The retail space is located along the building frontage at the corner of Third Avenue and E Street and it is supported by a plaza that will serve for outdoor seating and dining. Windows and balconies on the building upper floors connect the residents with the street and provide "eyes on the street." The plaza on the street i level and decks and lounges on the upper floors bring people to the outside of the building and create a vibrant atmosphere within the building and the street. The project's parking located on the ground floor with access from the alley is contained within the building and screened from public view. The building facades on Third Avenue and E Street provide an uninterrupted view of the building and encourages pedestrian access and activity without the potential interruption of vehicles coming out of the building, which sole access is from the rear alley. The project's tenant and pedestrian connection and accessibility, plus the alley access to the parking garage, 4 is consistent with the above guidelines of the Urban Core Specific Plan, 3 3 3 Building Architecture "The design of an infill building in the Village, particularly its front facade, should l be influenced by historically significant facades on the street but should not attempt to copy them." "Building facades should be detailed in such a way as to make them appear smaller in scale. The smaller scale can be achieved through vertical and horizontal articulation such as: • breaks (reveals, recesses)in the surface of the wall itself; ■placement of window and door openings; Planning Commission June 13,2018 Page-6 Or the placement of bay windows, balconies, awnings, and canopies. The proposed project architecture features a modern architectural design that takes from the Art Moderne and Art Deco architectural styles. This is consistent with the Moderne and Art Deco historic structures along Third Avenue, and fits within the variety of architectural styles of the existing buildings in the surrounding area. The building mass is articulated by horizontal and vertical plane offsets, including windows, doors, and balconies, which provide variety and interest and are highlighted by accent colors and materials that break up the building's surfaces and roof lines. The building fagades include a variety of building materials and colors, including cement plaster and siding, metal railings, storefront systems and awnings and others that create a varied and interesting design composition. The overall design, form and scale of the i building fit within the guidelines of the Urban Core Specific Plan Village District and set a strong F precedent for future development planned for downtown Chula Vista. The project has been designed to integrate.and blend with the Urban Core Specific Plan Village District context, while setting the example in terms of style and quality of architectural design. The project will be a pedestrian friendly development intended to connect with the street, the rest of the neighborhood, and connect to public transit. All street-facing building elements are designed to support pedestrian traffic and engage the residents with the activities of the street and the immediate community and the commercial activities along Third Avenue, FAR/Building Height/Setbacks The proposed project is also consistent with the Urban Core Specific Plan regulations related to the building Floor Area Ratio (FAR), building height and building setbacks. The subject Site has an area of approximately 11,589 square-feet. The Urban Core Specific Pian allows a maximum FAR of 4.5. The proposed Project has a FAR of 3.4, which is within the FAR permitted by the Urban Core Specific Plan. The maximum allowed building height (84 feet) is also met by the project's proposed height of 60 feet. The building mass and facades are well articulated to minimize the apparent height of the building. The many wall surface off-sets and varied roof lines along the north and west facades minimize the building height and compensate for the apparent wall height. The stepback at the fifth floor also provides a break on the wall and building height. The Urban Core Specific Plan building setback requirement for the subject Site is zero, which means that the building can be built up to the property lines. Open Space and Landscaping i The Urban Core Specific Pian requires the provision of 200 square-feet of usable open space per residential unit. Open space is any area with minimum dimensions of 60 square-feet (6'x1a') and devoted to the following common, private, or public uses: patios, porches, balconies, decks. The Urban Core Specific Plan specifies that an open space is a passive or active Planning Commission June 13,2018 Page:-7 recreational/leisure use or facility that is not used for enclosed dwelling unit floor area or commercial use space. Based on the proposed 23 units, the total amount of open space required is 4,600 square-feet. The project provides approximately 5,108 square-feet of open space in the form of a plaza, balconies, decks and lounges, which meet the requirements and guidelines of the Urban Core Specific Plan. Additionally, the project provides an adequate amount of landscaped areas in the form of planter areas, enhanced paving, and decomposed granite, mostly concentrated on the ground floor and the fifth floor. The amount and type of landscape provided is sufficient for an in-fill project within a small parcel in the Downtown area and is consistent with the Urban Core Specific Plan guidelines. The project conforms to the requirements of the Urban Core Specific Plan in terms of the required open space and landscaping. CONCLUSION The proposed project will provide new investment, modern housing facilities, new commercial space, and significant site improvements that will contribute to revitalize and enhance the Site and the Downtown area. The project's pedestrian orientation and location will provide E convenient access for residents to nearby public transportation. The project will provide new housing that will improve the housing mix and enhance residential opportunities in the neighborhood. The Site will be developed with a quality project that is consistent with the vision, objectives and policies of the General Plan and meets the requirements and guidelines of the Urban Core Specific Plan. The proposed project is well planned, incorporating the principals of Smart Growth and resource conservation. It is designed to respect and blend with the community character, local history, and climate. The proposed project will re-activate the street and contribute to improve the neighborhood and create residential and business activity in this part of the City. Based on the description and evaluation of the project and the conclusions above, staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the proposed project subject to the conditions contained in the resolution. DECISION-MAKER CONFLICTS Staff has reviewed the property holdings of the Planning Commission members and has found no property holdings within 500 feet of the boundaries of the property, which is the subject of this action. Consequently, this item does not present a disqualifying real property-related financial conflict of interest under California Code of Regulations Title 2, section 18702.2(a)(11), for purposes of the Political Reform Act (Cal. Gov't Code §87700, etseq.). Staff is not independently aware, and has not been informed by any Planning Commission member, of any other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision-maker conflict of interest in this matter. Planning Commission June 13,2018 Page-8 FISCAL IMPACT The proposed project is a private development. The application fees and processing costs are paid for by the Applicant. Attachments 1, Locator Map 2. Project's Concept Plans 3. Parking Study i i 1 I i f i i. i c f fi i 1� 1 v PROJECT S PG LOCATION E S� r 7- 74 7 ,..y V V0 O�S� I OCATO R F SZ NORTHDR17-0039 ATTACHMENT 2 - (project concept plans) provided on flash drive 201 THIRD AVENUE ATTACHMENT 3 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use City of Chula Vista 1201 Third Ave] April 20, 2010 Final Traffic ImPact AnaWls Prepared for: Mr. Dan Johnson Tierra Del Sol Investments 1410 Santa Barbara Street San Diego, CA 92107 Prepared by Justin Rasas (RCE 60690) a principal with: LVs1/I011609MV, A/C. 11622 El Camino Real, Suite 100, San Diego, CA 92130 Phone 619-890-1253, Fax 619-374-7247 Job 41723 Table of Contents Executive Summaiy: 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use.......................................................................iv 1.0 Introduction..................................................................................................................................1 2.0 Study Methodology.....................................................................................................................4 2.1 Study Area Criteria..................................................................................................................4 2.2 Scenario Criteria......................................................................................................................4 2.3 Traffic Analysis Criteria.........................................................................................................4 2.3.1 Intersections.........................................................................................................................5 2.3.2 Street Segments...................................................................................................................5 2.3.3 Growth Management Oversight Commission on Traffic .................................................5 2.4 Significance Criteria................................................................................................................6 3.0 Existing Conditions.....................................................................................................................8 3.1 Existing Street System............................................................................................................8 3.2 Existing Roadway Improvements...........................................................................................8 3.3 Existing Transit........................................................................................................................8 3.4 Existing Conditions Summary................................................................................................8 3.5 Existing Traffic Volumes and LOS Analyses......................................................................10 4.0 Project Description....................................................................................................................12 4.1 Project Access........................................................................................................................12 4.2 Project Parking ......................................................................................................................12 4.3 Project Traffic Generation....................................................................................................12 4.4 Project Distribution and Assignment....................................................................................13 5.0 Existing plus Project Conditions...............................................................................................16 6.0 Near Term Conditions...............................................................................................................18 7.0 Near Term plus Project Conditions ..........................................................................................21 8.0 Conclusions................................................................................................................................23 List of Figures Figure1: Project Location.......................................................................................................................2 Figure2: Site Plan...................................................................................................................................3 Figure 3: Existing Roadway Geometrics...............................................................................................9 Figure4: Existing Volumes..................................................................................................................11 Figure5: Project Distribution...............................................................................................................14 Figure6: Project Assignment ...............................................................................................................15 Figure 7: Existing plus Project Volumes..............................................................................................17 Figure 8: Cumulative with Ambient Growth Volumes.......................................................................19 Figure9: Near Term Volumes..............................................................................................................20 Figure 10: Near Term plus Project Volumes.......................................................................................22 List of Tables Table 1: Intersection Level of Service Definitions(HCM 20 10) .........................................................5 Table 2: Street Segment Daily Capacity and LOS(City of Chula Vista) ............................................5 Table 3: Existing Intersection Level of Service...................................................................................10 18Sfn00,616 ing,/He. 201Third Avenue Mixed Use—Final TIA TraffleandTransportation ii April 20,2018 Table 4: Existing Segment Daily Volume and Level of Service........................................................10 Table 5: Existing Segment Volume Trend for GMOC .......................................................................10 Table 6: Project Traffic Generation......................................................................................................13 Table 7: Existing plus Project Intersection Level of Service..............................................................16 Table 8: Existing Plus Project Segment Daily Volume and Level of Service...................................16 Table 9: Existing plus Project Segment Volume Trend for GMOC...................................................16 Table 10: Near Term Intersection Level of Service ............................................................................18 Table 11: Near Term Segment Daily Volume and Level of Service..................................................18 Table 12: Near Term Segment Volume Trend for GMOC.................................................................18 Table 13: Near Term Plus Project Intersection Level of Service........................................................21 Table 14: Near Term Plus Project Segment Daily Volume and Level of Service.............................21 Table 15: Near Term plus Project Segment Volume Trend for GMOC............................................21 Appendices Appendix A.......................................................City of Chula Vista Segment Capacity and LOS Table Appendix B.......................................................................City of Chula Vista Roadway Classifications Appendix C........................................................................................Proposed Roadway Improvements Appendix D....................................................................City Funded Project(TF-397 E Street Median). AppendixE..............................................................................................................Transit Route Details AppendixF..............................................................................................................................Count Data Appendix G..................................................Existing Intersection LOS,E St Counts, and GMOC LOS AppendixH..........................................................................................................On Site Parking Details Appendix I..................... ......................................................................City Off Site Parking Locations Appendix J......................Chen Ryan Associates' Parking Study June 1,2017&UCSP VI-13 Details AppendixK...............................................................................................SANDAG and ITE Trip Rates Appendix L................................................................................Existing plus Project LOS Calculations AppendixM...............................................................................................Near Term LOS Calculations AppendixN............................................................................Near Term plus Project LOS Calculations LOSEnginee'da ,,/We 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use—Final TIA /raff/candT1rans,08918/0B iii April 20, 2018 Executive Summary: 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use The proposed mixed-use project (23 multi-family units and 2,325 square feet of ground floor commercial space) is located at 201 Third Avenue in Chula Vista, California. The project site is currently vacant. The project opening year is anticipated to be 2019. Using SANDAG traffic rates, the project is calculated to generate 556 daily trips, 45 AM peak hour trips, and 48 PM peak hour trips. This analysis outlines how the project has no calculated traffic impacts; therefore,mitigation measures are not required. The previous use had two curb cuts on Third Avenue, two curb cuts on E Street, and access to the alley. As part of the proposed project, the two curb cuts on Third Avenue and two curb cuts on E Street will be closed and project access will only be to/from the alley. The City parking requirement for the residential portion is 37 spaces and 5 spaces for the commercial component. Of the required 42 parking spaces, 20 will provided on-site and 22 will be off-site. The firm Chen Ryan Associate prepared a parking study dated June 1, 2017 that identified sufficient off-site parking for the project located in nearby parking Lots 1 and 2. Parking Lots 1 and 2 are within 500 feet of the project site. In the project vicinity,there are four bus routes with two adjacent to the project site and two nearby. Bus route 705 serves E Street along the project frontage while bus route 929 serves Third Avenue along the project frontage. Not immediately adjacent to the site, however approximately 1/4 mile to the south and west, respectively, is bus route 701 that serves F Street while route 704 serves 4th Avenue. Bus Routes within approximately 1/4 mile of the project site consist of 3 local routes of which one is to/from South Western College, Playa Bonita Shopping Center, and Transit Centers at E Street, H Street, and Palomar Street. There is one reginal route (Route 929) that serves the downtown San Diego to/from Iris Avenue Transit Center in south San Diego. Four scenarios were analyzed, which included Existing, Existing plus Project,Near Term, and Near Term plus Project Conditions. Operational findings and potential impacts by scenario are summarized below: 1) Under existing conditions, the study intersection and segment were calculated to operate at LOS C or better. The GMOC peak hours for E Street from Woodlawn Avenue to Bonita Glen Drive are operating LOS C or better. 2) Under existing plus project conditions,the study intersection and segment were calculated to operate at LOS C or better with no significant direct project impacts. Through deduction (based on an average decrease in daily volumes on E Street), the GMOC peak hours of E Street from Woodlawn Avenue to Bonita Glen Drive are not anticipated to change significantly nor degrade from the existing GMOC acceptable LOS. 3) Under near term conditions,the study intersection and segment were calculated to operate at LOS C or better. Through deduction (based on an average decrease in daily volumes on E Street) the GMOC peak hours of E Street from Woodlawn Avenue to Bonita Glen Drive are not anticipated to change significantly nor degrade from the existing GMOC acceptable LOS. LOSI&OW8erinq,kc. 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use—Final TIA r1rafficandrrans'88118#0 iv April 20, 2018 4) Under near term plus project conditions,the study intersection and segment were calculated to operate at LOS C or better with no cumulative impacts. Through deduction(based on an average decrease in daily volumes on E Street), the GMOC peak hours of E Street from Woodlawn Avenue to Bonita Glen Drive are not anticipated to change significantly nor degrade from the existing GMOC acceptable LOS. The project has no calculated traffic impacts; therefore,mitigation measures are not required. The project is located within the Urban Core Specific Plan (UCSP). The UCSP is intended to promote pedestrian friendly destinations. The project location aligns with and will benefit from the UCSP elements of pedestrian,bicycle facilities,transit, and parking opportunities. LOSTirq/neer/ng/We. 201Third Avenue Mixed Use—Final TIA Traffic andTranS10811 OR v April 20, 2018 1.0 1nt'Oduction The proposed mixed use project is located at 201 Third Avenue (southeast corner of Third Avenue and E Street) in Chula Vista, California. The project includes 23 multi-family units and 2,325 square feet of ground floor commercial space. The location of the project is shown in Figure I with a preliminary site plan shown in Figure 2. This report describes the existing roadway network in the vicinity of the project site and includes a review of the existing and proposed activities for weekday peak AM and PM periods, and daily traffic conditions when the project is completed. The format of this study includes the following chapters: 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Study Methodology 3.0 Existing Conditions 4.0 Project Description 5.0 Existing plus Project Conditions 6.0 Near Term Conditions 7.0 Near Term plus Project Conditions 8.0 Conclusions ionfl weeriOg,b/C. 201Third Avenue Mixed Use—Final TIA Traffic andTranspnrtatim 1 April 20,2018 Figure 9: Project Location Temecula t Riverside County San Diego County Fallbrook >9 Camp Joseph Pendleton Warner Springs s Vista is Oceanside 79 San Marcos Escondido Carlsbad Saha Ysabel Julian Encinitas Ramona Poway 97 79 52 Santee San Diego 175 EI Cajon 10 Pine Valley B 4s La Mes 94 Boulder 54 PROJECT • LOCATION Chula Vista 94 Pacific Ocean Campo Tecate _ .. --••— Imperial United States— .— •"•' Beach ,, .► •--••"� Legend (.lo Scale ,_,.,.. •• '• Mexico EAsting Roadway Proposed Roadway •••••••... S.�lf£Fmr�irn tc tasirfl weariBBQ/nc. 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use—Final TIA Traffic aBBYTrONSiB AI MAN 2 April 20, 2018 Figure 2: Site Plan LU z I / � m W o a a L z P V W Z V-1 UZ' :��� X O W V LU 0. = LU I'1 W O. CO ' a c F Uj E W¢ ' fV K A 7 Cat., n L. .,^rt d a e a ,;AI , t ' W„ h z 4 V P, , *R. CO M1!Y _ d O W W O CD (�� 5 ���� J eC I I � v o cc LL- i Q CL O O N d .y 5 0. GL ,rd LAJ ~ C) p ,um,e�w yar uNxf,�m�vlrnq c��o wxw eJrc,,, 1�a, .w s �7 q �» G z 33 J a 0 z W G. W t- Ell LOSEngineerim,,/nc. 201Third Avenue Mixed Use—Final TIA AMC 3 April 20,2018 2.0 Study Methodology The parameters by which this traffic study was prepared included the determination of what intersections and roadways are to be analyzed, the scenarios to be analyzed and the methods required for analysis. The criteria for each of these parameters are included herein. 2.1 Study Area Criteria The project study area was determined based city criteria and on a discussion with Chula Vista traffic engineering staff. The study area included the intersection of Third Avenue at E Street and the street segment of E Street from Third Avenue to Second Avenue. Additionally, the Growth Management Oversight Commission (GMOC) segment of E Street adjacent to the project was reviewed. The project is located within the Urban Core Specific Plan (UCSP). The UCSP is intended to promote pedestrian friendly destinations. The project location aligns with and will benefit from the UCSP elements of pedestrian, bicycle facilities, transit, and parking opportunities. Details of the UCSP can be found on the City of Chula Vista web site http://w-ww.chtilavistaca.gov/ departments/development-services/planning/ lanning-digital librar�/specific plan 2.2 Scenario Criteria The number of scenarios to be analyzed was provided by City staff. For this project, the following scenarios were included: 1) Existing Conditions 2) Existing plus Project Conditions 3) Near Term Conditions 4) Near Term plus Project Conditions 2.3 Traffic AnaIYSiS Criteria The traffic analyses prepared for this study were based on the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) operations analysis using Level of Service (LOS) evaluation criteria. The operating conditions of the study intersections, and street segments were measured using the HCM LOS designations, which ranges from A through F. LOS A represents the best operating condition and LOS F denotes the worst operating condition. The individual LOS criteria for each roadway component are described below. Aiiiigiiiii 1®SE110flee'dim,ke 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use—Final TIA T,rafiCa/1,4T,rus,,Nottat%®/I 4 April 20, 2018 2.3.1 Intersections The study intersections were analyzed based on the operational analysis outlined in the 2010 HCM. This process defines LOS in terms of average control delay per vehicle, which is measured in seconds. LOS at the intersections were calculated using the computer software program Synchro 8.0 (T rafficware Corporation). The HCM LOS for the range of delay by seconds for un-signalized and signalized intersections is described in Table 1. TABLE 1: INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITIONS MCM 20101 Level of Service Un-Signalized(TWSC and AWSC) Signalized Control Delay(seconds/vehicle) Control Delay(seconds/vehicle) A 0-10 < 10 B > 10-15 > 10-20 C > 15-25 >20-35 D >25-35 >35-55 E >35-50 > 55-80 F >50 >80 TWSC: Two Way Stop Control. AWSC:All Way Stop Control. Source:Highway Capacity Manual 2010(exhibit 19-1 for two way stop control,exhibit 20-2 for all way stop control,and exhibit 18-4 for signalized'intersections). 2.3.2 Street Segments The street segments were analyzed based on the functional classification of the roadway using the City of Chula Vista Average Daily Vehicle Trips capacity lookup table. The roadway segment capacity and LOS standards used to analyze street segments are summarized in Table 2 with a copy of the source included in Appendix A. TABLE 2:STREET SEGMENT DAILY CAPACITY AND LOS[CITY OF CHULA VISTA) Classification LOS LOS LOS LOS LOS A B C D E Expressway <52,000 <61,300 <70,000 <78,800 <87,500 Prime Arterial <37,500 <43,800 <50,000 <56,300 <62,500 Major Street(6 Lanes) <30,000 <35,000 <40,000 <45,000 <50,000 Major Arterial (4 Lanes) <22,500 <26,300 <30,000 <33,800 <37,500 Class I Collector <16,500 <19,300 <22,000 <24,800 <27,500 Class II Collector <9,000 <10,500 <12,000 <13,500 <15,000 Class III Collector <5,600 <6,600 <7,500 <8,400 <9,400 Urban Arterial <37,800 Downtown Promenade <14,400 Source: City of Chula Vista. 2.3.3 Growth Management Oversight Commission on Traffic The following is from the City's GMOC website: "Chula Vista maintains its excellent quality of life by carefully monitoring threshold standards or for eleven public facility and service topics, including eight city-controlled topics (Drainage, Fire and Emergency Medical Services, Fiscal, Libraries, Parks and Recreation, Police, Sewer, and Traffic); two outside agencies (Schools and Water); and one hybrid, Air Quality and Climate protection. These topics are identified in the 10SE9.0.0.01/n9,ke. 201Third Avenue Mixed Use-Final TIA Ttafficaad Brafluefiatian 5 April 20, 2018 city's Growth Management ordinance, updated and approved by City Council in 2015, and each includes a goal, objectives, one or more threshold standards, and implementation measures." Traffic: 1) Arterial Level of Service (ALOS) for Non-Urban Streets shall maintain LOS "C" or better; except,that during peak hours,LOS "D" can occur for no more than two hours of the day. 2) Urban Street Level of Service (ULOS) segments shall maintain LOS "D" or better; except that during peak hours,LOS "E" can occur for no more than two hours per day. The project is located within the ULOS area of the City. 2A Significance Criteria A project is considered to have caused either a direct or cumulative impact if the new project traffic has changed the operations as noted below. A direct impact is determined if the project traffic results in a measureable reduction in the LOS on intersections or segments. A cumulative impact results if the project traffic adding to a poor LOS. Short-Term (Within 4 Years of Proiect Processing) Intersections a. Project specific impact if both the following criteria are met: i.Level of service is LOS E or LOS F. ii.Project trips comprise 5%or more of entering volume. b. Cumulative impact if only(i)is met. Street Segments a.Project specific impact if all the following criteria are met: i. Level of service is LOS D for more than 2 hours or LOS E/F for lhour ii.Project trips comprise 5%or more of segment volume iii.Project adds greater than 800 ADT to the segment b. Cumulative impact if only(i)is met. Long-Term(5 or More Years after Project Processing Intersections a.Project specific impact if all the following criteria are met: i. Level of service is LOS E or LOS F. ii. Project trips comprise 5%or more of entering volume. b. Cumulative impact if only(i)is met. IOstogineefing/ac. 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use—Final TIA T/aifieJAY T 80s,,Wlatiff 6 April 20,2018 Street Segments a.Project specific impact if all the following criteria are met: i. Level of service is LOS D,LOS E, or LOS F. ii.Project trips comprise 5%or more of total segment volume. iii.Project adds greater than 800 ADT to the segment. b. Cumulative impact if only(i) is met.However,if the intersections along a LOS D or LOS E segment all operate at LOS D or better,the segment impact is considered not significant since intersection analysis is more indicative of actual roadway system operations than street segment analysis. If segment Level of Service is LOS F, impact is significant regardless of intersection LOS. If the impact identified in paragraph a. above occurs at study Near Term 10 or later, and is offsite and not adjacent to the project,the impact is considered cumulative. LOSEngineering,/BC. 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use—Final TIA Traffic an,ABOSper APA 7 April 20, 2018 3.0 Existing Conditions This section describes the study area street system, peak hour intersection volumes, daily roadway volumes,and existing LOS. 3.1 Existing Street System In the vicinity of the project, the following roadways were analyzed as part of this study. Details on the roadway classification are included in Appendix B. E Street from Third.Avenue to Second Avenue is classified as an Urban Arterial(4 Lane) according to the City of Chula Vista circulation plan. This portion of E Street is generally constructed as a 4 lane un-divided roadway with parking prohibited on both side of the roadway. The posted speed limit is 30 MPH. Bike lanes were not observed along this segment. Third Avenue from F Street to E Street is classified as a Downtown Promenade (214 Lanes) in the City of Chula Vista circulation plan. This portion of Third Avenue is generally built as a 2 lane un- divided roadway with diagonal parking on both side of the roadway. The posted speed limit is 25 NTH. Bike lanes were not observed along this segment. 3.2 Existing Roadway Improvements There are two identified roadway improvements in the vicinity of the project. 1) Urban Core Specific Plan Tier 1 Improvement 47: Third Avenue/E Street: Convert the northbound and southbound shared right-through lane into exclusive right-turn lanes (details in Appendix Q. 2) City funded construction project: E Street raised median between Third Avenue and Church Avenue within existing painted median (details in Appendix D). This improvement will restrict the alley access to right-in/right-out only movements. Scheduled for early 2018. 3.3 Existing Transit In the project vicinity,there are four bus routes with two adjacent to the project site and two nearby. Bus route 705 serves E Street along the project frontage while bus route 929 serves Third Avenue along the project frontage. Not immediately adjacent to the site, however approximately 1/a mile to the south and west, respectively, is bus route 701 that serves F Street while route 704 serves 4' Avenue. A map of the bus routes and their respective schedules are included in Appendix E 3.4 Existing Conditions Summary The existing conditions and existing roadway improvements are shown in Figure 3. L®SEWNWeedwy,,ifte. 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use—Final TIA TrafiicandTranspertatiff 8 April 20,2018 Figure 30 F►istiag Roadway Geometrics Existing Conditions Urban Core Specific Plan Improvements E Street ,� I 1E Q' E Street F a Signal Signal ----------------- c ,�� �Q CnQ BUS LL Bus Route �' City raised media:alley access Route 929 becomes right-in/right-out 705 E Street ; ® �; E Street - - - - �.eBProject� Location % .7Approx. 1/4 I >t IMile Radius Davidson Street I Q v , I r r F Street ®� ® t ® F Street 9eus — _ . . — [:RIuustl Route 701 I 29 _t11 �I I� G Street G Street LEGEND I' \/ `1 Left Tum Lane O Intersection Reference Number to LOS Tables No Scale f Right Tum Lane • Approximate Bus Stop Locations T Thru Lane — . . _ Bus Route 701(H St.Trolley to Palomar Trolley Transit Center) E' Combination Thru-Right Lane — — — Bus Route 704(E St.Trolley to Palomar Trolley Transit Center) 2U Two Lane Undivided Roadway .-----_ Bus Route 705(Southwestern College to Bay Front/E St.Trolley TC.) 41-1 Four Lane Undivided Roadway — • — • — Bus Route 929(Downtown San Diego to IRIS Ave Transit Center) Existing Roadways Not shown because it is on Broadway, the Route 932 serves Iris Ave Transit Center in South San Diego to/from 8th Street Transit Center in National City. This route is approx 3/4 miles from the project site. 10S,61101780.4 ing,IRA 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use—Final TIA Traffic amfrfanspvrtatioa 9 April 20,2018 3.5 Existing Traffic Volumes and LOS Analyses Existing morning commute (7-9 AM) and evening commute (4-6 PM) traffic volumes were obtained for the intersection of Third Avenue at E Street on Thursday, September 14, 2017. Segment volumes were obtained over a 24 hour period on Thursday, September 14, 2017 along E Street from Third Avenue to Second Avenue. The existing AM, PM, and daily volumes are shown on Figure 4, with count data included in Appendix F. Intersection LOS are shown in Table 3 that includes current conditions and with the changes proposed by the UCSP improvements. The segment LOS is shown in Table 4. The existing GMOC peak hours on E Street from Woodlawn Avenue to Third Ave and Third Avenue to Bonita Glen Drive are at operating LOS C or better while the volume trend along this segment has an average decrease of 2.5% as shown in Table 5. Existing intersection LOS calculations and the City's GMOC segment LOS along with the E Street 2017 counts are included in Appendix G. TABLE 3: EXISTING INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE Intersection and Movement Study _ Existing (Analysis)' Period Delay2 LOS' 1)Third Avenue at All AM 23.0 C E Street(S) All PM 29.6 C With UCSP All AM 23.1 C Improvements All PM 29.6 C Notes: 1) Intersection Analysis-(S)Signalized.2)Delay-HCM Average Control Delay in seconds.3)LOS:Level of Service. UCSP:Urban Core Specific Plan. TABLE 4: EXISTING SEGMENT DAILY VOLUME AND LEVEL OF SERVICE Existing Segment Classification LOS C Daily E Street Capacity Volume Vic LOS Third Ave to Second Ave Urban Arterial (41J) 30,000 18,357 0.612 A Notes: 4U =4 lane un-divided roadway. Daily volume is a 24 hour volume. LOS: Level of Service. V/C: Volume to capacity ratio. TABLE 5: EXISTING SEGMENT VOLUME TREND FOR GMOC E Street Year 2013 Daily Volume Year 2017 Daily Volume Broadway to Fifth Ave 19,565 15,368 Third Ave to Second Ave 18,639 18,357 First Ave to Bonita Glen 16,951 20,026 Totals: 55,155 53,751 Percent Change: -2.5% Under existing conditions, the study intersection and segment were calculated to operate at LOS C or better. The GMOC peak hours of E Street from Woodlawn Avenue to Bonita Glen Drive are operating LOS C or better. lgsEngineerioy,/nc. 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use—Final TIA TratficJAY Aransportati®n 10 April 20, 2018 Figure 4: Existing Volumes 24 68 57 0 E Street (57) (151) (163) �j y L> 24 (37) 75 (102) 340 (615) -� O ^E-- 524 (456) 56 (153) - 99 (143) -11 t f 65 150 53 (89) (118) (129) a N � c � LL Q Q cA Q 18,357 E Street y E Street 1 � =ProjectI � Location i I � TI U I Davidson Street ¢I U I I i I I I I F Street ; F Street G Street G Street LEGEND XX AM peak hour volumes at intersections (YY) PM peak hour volumes at intersections ZOZZZ Daily volumes shown along segments Intersection Reference Number N # to LOS Tables Existing Roadway No Scale ---- Existing Alley LOSI&BOWeedW9,,/nc. 201Third Avenue Mixed Use—Final TIA Iraffe19BYTrans'artattoa 11 April 20, 2018 .0 Project Description The project includes 23 multi-family units and 2;325 square feet of ground floor commercial space. The exact use of the commercial space is unknown; however, it could include retail, food, or coffee shop use. The project site is currently vacant. The project opening year is anticipated to be 2019. 4.1 Project Access The previous use had two curb cuts on Third Avenue, two curb cuts on E Street, and access to the alley. As part of the proposed project, the two curb cuts on Third Avenue and two curb cuts on E Street will be closed and project access will only be to/from the alley. 4.2 Project Parking The City parking requirement for the residential portion is 37 spaces and 5 spaces for the commercial component (parking requirement from site plan included in Appendix I). Of the required 42 parking spaces, 20 will provided on-site and 22 will be off-site. The City has identified ten (10) off-site parking lots with a total of approximately 951 parking spaces (Appendix I). The firm Chen Ryan Associate prepared a parking study dated June 1, 2017 that identified the availability of off-site parking for two projects that included this project at 201 Third Ave and another separate project at 230 Church Ave (report included in Appendix J). The Chen Ryan study concluded: "201 Third Avenue — The off-site parking demand for the 201 Third Avenue project could be accommodated with the excess parking capacity in [City] Parking Lots 1 and 2. As shown in Table 3 and 4, Lots 1 and 2 were observed to have sufficient excess parking capacity to absorb the off-site project parking demand during all times of the day, and would still have a surplus of 22 parking spaces during peak times (weekdays between 7:00 PM and 8:00 PMI)." Parking Lots 1 and 2 are within 500 feet of the project site as shown in Appendix J. 4.3 Project Traffic Generation SANDAG traffic rates from the Brief Guide of Vehicular Trak Generation Rates for the San Diego Region, April 2002 and rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation Manual 9'Edition, 2012 were reviewed for applicability to the proposed project. For the residential component, SANDAG multi-family trip rate of 8 ADT/unit was applied. The exact commercial use is unknown; therefore, to be conservative the higher rate between SANDAG retail (40 ADT/1,000 sf), SANDAG restaurant sit down high turnover (160 ADT/1,000 sf), and ITE land use 936 (Coffee Shop or Donut Shop without drive-through) at 108.38 ADT/1,000 sf were reviewed LOSIENOI98100,,kc 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use—Final TIA 1ratticaBAFAMnspol$a1W 12 April 20,2018 and determined that using the higher SANDAG rate of 160 ADT/1,000 sf would be more conservative(SANDAG and ITE rates included in Appendix I). The commercial component will have pass-by and diverted trips that are already on the adjacent and nearby roadways that will visit the site. However, to be conservative, pass-by and diverted trip reductions were not applied. Using SANDAG traffic rates, the project is calculated to generate 556 daily trips,45 AM peak hour trips (18 inbound and 27 outbound), and 48 PM peak hour trips (31 inbound and 17 outbound) as shown in Table 6. TABLE 6: PROJECT TRAFFIC GENERATION Proposed AM PM Land Use Rate Size&Units ADT % Split IN OUT % Split IN OUT Residential-Multi Family 8 /DU 23 DU 184 8% 0.2 0.8 3 12 10% 0.7 0.3 13 6 Restaurant(sit down high turnover) 160 /KSF 2,325 SF 372 8% 0.5 0.5 15 15 8% 0.6 0.4 18 12 TOTAL 556 18 27 31 17 Source: SAN DAG Brief Guide of Vehicular Traffic Generation Rates for the San Diego Region, April 2002. DU:Dwelling Unit SF-Square Feet;ADT-Average Daily Traffic;Split-percent inbound and outbound. 4.4 Project Distribution and Assignment Project traffic was distributed to the study area roadways based on the circulation system and location of off-site parking areas. Due to the project using both on-site and off-site parking areas, the distribution represents travel to the site and off-site parking areas generally south of the project site. The project distribution is shown in Figure 5. The project assignment is shown in Figure 6. LOSEN-098ri11g,INC 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use—Final TIA Traffic and TIFORS 811J M 13 April 20, 2018 Figure 5: Project Distribution E Street 5% 5% s � 12% —> E- 13% F 25% `l T f- 25% 10% 25% LEGEND 14 Distribution O OIntersection Reference Number r to LOS Tables Existing Roadways Approx v > No Scale 350 a Feet 25% Parki ^� .r ng 13 sp Lo ation aces s Parking IF N Feet Parking a - ' # , ✓ 29 spaces ^ " r Parking 118 spac Parkin o r g d 54 spaces r „ „ r 4, w a Parking X'eYxd ? 833 spaces c PR 2� MlA_d llsr?ys7�'arrnxsl ,# � y�,%° ,� „ Image Source:City of Chula Vista LOSfi19*98,,i11g,1W. 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use—Final TIA MffficandTransponation 14 April 20,201 s Figure 6: Pr®leet Assignment a 1 1 E Street 0 (2) (2) Q' .�J Li 0 () -.+ L 0 O 2 (4) -�- 0 F 0 () 2 (4) 4 (8) `l t rl- 7 3 7 (4) (2) (4) a m C: C = O C C N LL 1139 E Street y E Street 1 W Project 1 Location i ¢' IL TI U N i 7 Davidson Street ¢1 U 1 1 1 1 I I 1 F Street i F Street G Street G Street LEGEND XX AM peak hour volumes at intersections (YY) PM peak hour volumes at intersections ODaily volumes shown along segments Intersection Reference Number N # to LOS Tables Existing Roadway No Scale ---- Existing Alley 110111 ineeria,,inc. 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use—Final TIA TrMCIfnd rfaBSPOI AON 15 April 20, 2018 5.0 Existing plus Project Conditions This scenario documents the addition of project traffic onto existing traffic for AM, PM, and daily conditions with volumes shown in Figure 7. Intersection LOS are shown in Table 7 that includes current conditions and with the changes proposed by the UCSP improvements. The segment LOS is shown in Table 8. The existing GMOC peak hours on E Street from Woodlawn Avenue to Third Ave and Third Avenue to Bonita Glen Drive are at operating LOS C or better while the volume trend along this segment has an average decrease of 2.0% with the addition of project traffic as shown in Table 9. Therefore, through deduction the GMOC segment of E Street (Woodlawn to Bonita Glen Drive) is not anticipated to change significantly nor degrade in LOS. Existing plus project intersection LOS calculations are included in Appendix H. TABLE 1: EXISTING PLUS PROJECT INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE Intersection and Movement Study_ Existing _ Existing+ Project (Analysis)' Period Delay2 LOSS DelayZ LOSS Delta Direct Impact?5 1)Third Avenue at All AM 23.0 C 23.2 C 0.2 No E Street(S) All PM 29.6 C 30.3 C 0.7 No With UCSP All AM 23.1 —(5-23.3 C 0.2 No Improvements All PM 29.6 C 30.3 C 0.7 No Notes: 1)Intersection Analysis-(S)Signalized.2)Delay-HCM Average Control Delay in seconds. 3) LOS: Level of Service. 4) Delta is the increase in delay from project.5)Direct Impact if project traffic exceeds threshold. UCSP: Urban Core Specific Plan. TABLE 8: EXISTING PLUS PROJECT SEGMENT DAILY VOLUME AND LEVEL OF SERVICE Existing Project Existing+Project Segment Classification LOS C Daily Daily Daily Change Project Capacity E Street Volume V/C LOS Volume Volume V/C LOS in V/C Impact? Third Ave to Second Ave Urban Arterial(4U) 30,000 18,357 0.612 A 139 18,496 0.617 A 0.005 No Notes:4U=4 lane un-divided roadway.Daily volume is a 24 hour volume.LOS:Level of Service.V/C:Volume to capacity ratio. TABLE 9: EXISTING PLUS PROJECT SEGMENT VOLUME TREND FOR GMOC E Street Year 2013 Daily Volume Year 2017 Daily Volume Broadway to Fifth Ave 19,565 15,368 Project traffic: 0 139 Third Ave to Second Ave 18,639 18,357 Project traffic: 0 139 First Ave to Bonita Glen 16,951 20,026 Project traffic: 0 139 Totals: 55,155 54,029 Percent Change: -2.0% Under existing plus project conditions, the study intersection and segment were calculated to operate at LOS C or better with no significant direct project t impacts. Through deduction (based on an average decrease in daily volumes on E Street), the GMOC peak hours of E Street from Woodlawn Avenue to Bonita Glen Drive are not anticipated to change significantly nor degrade from the existing GMOC acceptable LOS. L®SEngiaeef-4,,/We 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use—Final TIA Raffle andTOOS108118H 16 April 20,2018 Figure 7: Existing plus Project Volumes 24 69 58 .o E Street (5) (153) (165) h Q 24 (37) 75 (102) 342 (619) —> 10 <— 524 (456) 58 (157) A 103 (151) �l I f 72 153 60 (93) (120) (133) a a) s= c ami LL > FQ Q Q 18,496 E Street y E Street 1 � Project I � Location < �I U U I � Davidson Street ¢i v I I I i F Street F Street G Street G Street LEGEND XX AM peak hour volumes at intersections (W) PM peak hour volumes at intersections Z,ZZZ Daily volumes shown along segments OIntersection Reference Number # to LOS Tables Ebsting Roadway No Scale ---- EwstingAlley LOSEfigineering,AM. 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use—Final TIA Traffic myARNSA®rtat 0 17 April 20,2018 .0 Near Term Conditions Near Term conditions include nearby known and submitted cumulative projects and an ambient growth factor to account for cumulative projects that are unknown and/or outside the study area. For this study area the cumulative project of 177 Landis Avenue (52 unit senior apartment project), 222 Church Avenue (22 unit senior apartment project), and a 0.5%ambient growth per year for two years (I%total) has been added even though there has been a an average daily volume decrease of 2.5% on E Street between 2013 and 2017 as previously documented in Table 5. The cumulative with ambient growth volumes are shown in Figure 8 while the near term (existing + cumulative + ambient) are shown in Figure 9. Intersection LOS are shown in Table 10 for current roadway conditions and with the changes proposed by UCSP improvements. The segment LOS is shown in Table 8. The existing GMOC peak hours on E Street from Woodlawn Avenue to Third Ave and Third Avenue to Bonita Glen Drive are at operating LOS C or better while the volume trend along this segment has an average decrease of 1.6%with the addition of project traffic as shown in Table 12. Therefore, through deduction the GMOC segment of E Street (Woodlawn to Bonita Glen Drive) is not anticipated to change significantly nor degrade in LOS. Near term intersection LOS calculations are included in Appendix I. TABLE 10: NEAR TERM INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE Intersection and Movement Peak Near Term (Analysis)I Hour Delayz LOSS 1)Third Avenue at All AM 23.1 C E Street(S) All PM 29.9 C With UCSP All AM 23.2 C Improvements All PM 29.9 C Notes: 1) Intersection Analysis-(S)Signalized.2) Delay-HCM Average Control Delay in seconds. 3)LOS: Level of Service. UCSP: Urban Core Specific Plan. TABLE 11: NEAR TERM SEGMENT DAILY VOLUME AND LEVEL OF SERVICE Segment Classification LOS C Daily Near Term E Street Cnnnnitv Volume V/C LOS Third Ave to Second Ave Urban Arterial(4U) 30,000 18,615 0.621 A Notes:4U=4 lane un-divided roadway. Daily volume is a 24 hour volume.LOS:Level of Service.V/C:Volume to capacity ratio TABLE 12: NEAR TERM SEGMENT VOLUME TREND FOR GMOC E Street Year 2013 Daily Volume Year 2017 Daily Volume Broadway to Fifth Ave 19,565 15,368 Cumulative& I%Growth: 0 258 Third Ave to Second Ave 18,639 18,357 Cumulative& 1%Growth: 0 258 First Ave to Bonita Glen 16,951 20,026 Cumulative& I%Growth: 0 258 Totals: 55,155 54,267 Percent Change -1.6% Under near term conditions,the study intersection and segment were calculated to operate at LOS C or better. Through deduction (based on an average decrease in daily volumes on E Street) the GMOC peak hours of E Street from Woodlawn Avenue to Bonita Glen Drive are not anticipated to change significantly nor degrade from the existing GMOC acceptable LOS. L®SAAwfleerifly,ifle 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use—Final TIA Traff egolf rZanfle atim 18 April 20,2018 Figure G: Cumulative with 9mbieut Growth Volumes 0 2 2 E Street (1) (2) (3) 1E y 0 4 (7) -� J E— 7 (s) 1 (2) 1 (1) 2 2 1 (3) (1) (1) 'O N m m C E -2 O c LLQ HQ CnQ Landis Cumulative 258 Project ADT E Street y E Street 1 Church Cumulative Project Davidson Street � Q L � U 1 F Street ; -C F Street G Street G Street LEGEND XX AM peak hour volumes at intersections (YY) PM peak hour volumes at intersections Z,ZZZ ADT volumes shown along segments OIntersection Reference Number to LOS Tables N Existing Roadway ---- Existing Alley No Scale ® Approximate cumulative project location Inogineedn,fnc 201Third Avenue Mixed Use—Final TIA JraffiCOnfT,rawfle/talien 19 April 20,2018 Figure 9: Near Term Volumes 24 70 59 E Street �6) (153) (16666) Q 24(37) 76 (103) 344 (622) > O F 531 (465) 57 (155) �F 100 (144) t ( 67 152 54 (92) (119) (130) N a N "a o c ILQ Q C�Q 18,615 E Street 1 E Street (D Project Location i Q I � (D U �I Davidson Street ¢, v I I I i I F Street i F Street G Street G Street LEGEND XX AM peak hour volumes at intersections (YY) PM peak hour volumes at intersections Z,ZZZ Daily volumes shown along segments OIntersection Reference Number to LOS Tables Existing Roadway --- Existing Alley No Scale LOSEag/neelAW,,/fie 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use—Final TIA Jl l// JBAFAJflSflflf1 /e/I 20 April 20,2018 7.0 Naar Farm plus Project Conditions This section documents the near term plus project conditions. The near term plus project volumes are shown in Figure 10. Intersection LOS are shown in 'fable 13 for current roadway conditions and with the changes proposed by the UCSP improvements. The segment LOS is shown in Table 14. The existing GMOC peak hours on E Street from Woodlawn Avenue to Third Ave and Third Avenue to Bonita Glen Drive are at operating LOS C or better while the volume trend along this segment has an average decrease of 1.1% with the addition of project traffic as shown in Table 15. Therefore, through deduction the GMOC segment of E Street (Woodlawn to Bonita Glen Drive) is not anticipated to change significantly nor degrade in LOS. Near term intersection LOS calculations are included in Appendix J. TABLE 13: NEAR TERM PLUS PROJECT INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE Intersection and Movement Peak Near Term Near Term+Project (Analysis)' Hour Delay2 LOSS Delay2 LOSS Delta Cumulative Impacts 1)Third Avenue at All AM 23.1 C 23.3 C 0.2 No E Street(S) All PM 29.9 C 30.6 C 0.7 No With UCSP All AM 23.2 C 23.4 C 0.2 No Improvements All PM 29.9 C 30.6 C 0.7 No Notes: 1)Intersection Analysis-(S)Signalized.2)Delay-HCM Average Control Delay in seconds. 3)LOS: Level of Service. 4)Delta is the increase in delay from project. 5)Cumulative Impact if project traffic exceeds threshold. UCSP: Urban Core Specific Plan. TABLE 14: NEAR TERM PLUS PROJECT SEGMENT DAILY VOLUME AND LEVEL OF SERVICE Near Term Project Near Term+Project Segment Classification LOS C Daily Daily Daily Change Project Capacity Volume VIC LOS Volume Volume V/C LOS in VIC Impact? E Street Third Ave to Second Ave Urban Arterial(4U) 30,000 18,615 0.621 A 139 18,754 0.625 A 0.005 No Notes:41-1=4 lane un-divided roadway.Daily volume is a 24 hour volume.LOS:Level of Service.V/C:Volume to capacity ratio. TABLE 15. NEAR TERM PLUS PROJECT SEGMENT VOLUME TREND FOR GMOC E Street Year 2013 Daily Volume Year 2017 Daily Volume Broadway to Fifth Ave 19,565 15,368 Cumulative, 1%Growth, and Project: 0 397 Third Ave to Second Ave 18,639 18,357 Cumulative, 1% Growth, and Project: 0 397 First Ave to Bonita Glen 16,951 20,026 Cumulative, 1% Growth, and Project: 0 397 Totals: 55,155 54,545 Percent Change: -1.1% Under near term plus project conditions, the study intersection and segment were calculated to operate at LOS C or better with no cumulative impacts. Through deduction (based on an average decrease in daily volumes on E Street),the GMOC peak hours of E Street from Woodlawn Avenue to Bonita Glen Drive are not anticipated to change significantly nor degrade from the existing GMOC acceptable LOS. Ifluggineerifg Inc. 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use—Final TIA T/MCafId AWSlle/Iatiff 21 April 20,2018 Figure 10: Near Term plus Project Volumes 24 71 60 E Street (58) (155) (1L688) Q h 24 (37) 76 (103) 346 (626) O <— 531 (465) 59 (159) 104 (152) l- 74 155 61 (96) (121) (134) �C O C c c (D (D LL< ~Q f�Q 18,754 E Street E Street 1 � Project Location Davidson Street i F Street ; F Street G Street G Street LEGEND XX AM peak hour volumes at intersections (YY) PM peak hour volumes at intersections Z,ZZZ Daily volumes shown along segments OIntersection Reference Number N to LOS Tables Emsting Roadway ---- Existing Alley No Scale [OSEngineering,inc. 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use—Final TIA TrafficONrZonflonatinn 22 April 20,2018 0.0 Conclusions The proposed mixed-use project is located at 201 Third Avenue (southeast corner of Third Avenue and E Street) in Chula Vista, California. The project includes 23 multi-family units and 2,325 square feet of ground floor commercial space. Using SANDAG traffic rates, the project is calculated to generate 556 daily trips, 45 AM peak hour trips, and 48 PM peak hour trips. The project site is currently vacant. The project opening year is anticipated to be 2019. The previous use had two curb cuts on Third Avenue, two curb cuts on E Street, and access to the alley. As part of the proposed project, the two curb cuts on Third Avenue and two curb cuts on E Street will be closed and project access will only be to/from the alley. The City parking requirement for the residential portion is 37 spaces and 5 spaces for the commercial component. Of the required 42 parking spaces, 20 will provided on-site and 22 will be off-site. The firm Chen Ryan Associate prepared a parking study dated June 1, 2017 that identified sufficient off-site parking for the project located in nearby parking Lots 1 and 2. Parking Lots 1 and 2 are within 500 feet of the project site. In the project vicinity, there are four bus routes with two adjacent to the project site and two nearby. Bus route 705 serves E Street along the project frontage while bus route 929 serves Third Avenue along the project frontage. Not immediately adjacent to the site, however approximately 1/4 mile to the south and west, respectively, is bus route 701 that serves F St while route 704 serves 4a' Ave. Bus Routes within approximately i/4 mile of the project site consist of 3 local routes of which one is to/from South Western College, Playa Bonita Shopping Center, and Transit Centers at E Street, H Street, and Palomar Street. There is one reginal route (Route 929) that serves the downtown San Diego to/from Iris Avenue Transit Center in south San Diego. Four scenarios were analyzed, which included Existing,Existing plus Project,Near Term, and Near Term plus Project Conditions. Operational findings and potential impacts by scenario are summarized below: 1) Under existing conditions, the study intersection and segment were calculated to operate at LOS C or better. The GMOC peak hours of E Street from Woodlawn Avenue to Bonita Glen Drive are operating LOS C or better. 2) Under existing plus project conditions,the study intersection and segment were calculated to ID operate at LOS C or better with no significant direct project impacts. Through deduction (based on an average decrease in daily volumes on E Street), the GMOC peak hours of E Street from Woodlawn Avenue to Bonita Glen Drive are not anticipated to change significantly nor degrade from the existing GMOC acceptable LOS. 3) Under near term conditions, the study intersection and segment were calculated to operate at LOS C or better. Through deduction (based on an average decrease in daily volumes on E Street) the GMOC peak hours of E Street from Woodlawn Avenue to Bonita Glen Drive are not anticipated to change significantly nor degrade from the existing GMOC acceptable LOS. 4) Under near term plus project conditions, the study intersection and segment were calculated to operate at LOS C or better with no cumulative impacts. Through deduction (based on an ISSfnginee,617g,/ne. 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use—Final TIA Traffic JIM Tfawflell AOA 23 April 20,2018 average decrease in daily volumes on E Street), the GMOC peak hours of E Street from Woodlawn Avenue to Bonita Glen Drive are not anticipated to change significantly nor degrade from the existing GMOC acceptable LOS. The project has no calculated traffic impacts; therefore, mitigation measures are not required. The project is located within the Urban Core Specific Plan (UCSP). The UCSP is intended to promote pedestrian friendly destinations. The project location aligns with and will benefit from the UCSP elements of pedestrian,bicycle facilities, transit, and parking opportunities. ISSfO0fOe01 9,,/0C, 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use—Final TIA DaffOCWAFTra0Sp01118 0O 24 April 20, 2018 Appendix A City of Chula Vista Segment Capacity and LOS Table 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use Traffic Study Appendix Page 1 of 72 CITY OF CHULA VISTA ROADWAY CAPACITY STANDARDS* AVERAGE DAILY VEHICLE TRIPS ROAD LEVEL OF SERVICE CLASS X-SECTION A B C D E V/C RATIO (0.6) (0.7) (0.8) (0.9) (1.0) Expressway 104/128 52,000 61,300 70,000 78,800 87,500 Prime Arterial 104/128 37,500 43,800 50,000 56,300 62,500 Major Street 104/128 30,000 35,000 40,000 45,000 50,000 (6 lanes) Major Street 80/104 22,500 26,300 30,000 33,800 37,500 (4 lanes) Class I 74/94 16,500 19,300 22,000 24,800 27,500 Collector Class 11 52/72 9,000 10,500 12,000 13,500 15,000 Collector Class III 40/60 5,600 6,600 7,500 8,400 9,400 Collector LOS `C' Capacities are from City of Chula Vista Circulation Element of the General Plan. Other levels of service are derived by volume to capacity (v/c) ratios. This is only a guideline and capacities included in this table represent urban conditions. Rural roadways with little side friction and/or widening at intersections can accommodate much higher volumes than stated on this table. 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use Traffic Study Appendix Page 2 of 72 Appendix C City of Chula Vista Roadway Classifications 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use Traffic Study Appendix Page 3 of 72 LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT CHAPTER 5 00 TRANSPORTATION 5.1 Introduction Chula Vista's transportation system connects our different land n` uses with various types of roads and paths, providing access to where we live,work, shop, and spend our leisure time. The system plays an important role in shaping the overall structure and form of the City, in that it simultaneously divides and connects land uses. As Chula Vista and surrounding areas continue to grow, the transportation system must be able to accommodate future traffic and provide the means to move people and goods within and throughout Chula Vista. This section of the Land Use and Transportation Element discusses Chula Vista's Circulation Plan; Measurements of Traffic; Urban Core Circulation Element; Public Transit Plan; Bikeway System; Pedestrian Sidewalks, Paths and Trails; Movement of Goods; and Noise (as it relates to traffic). Trails and bikeways are further discussed in Chapter 9, Environmental Element A Transportation Study was completed for this General Plan and is summarized in the Environmental Impact Report(EIR).The EIR examines existing roadway conditions (Year 2004), as well as a variety of future traffic conditions (Year 2030 and Build-out Scenario). Although long- term CEQA-level analysis was performed in the EIR,the City performs additional growth management analysis on specific circulation roadways throughout the City, as described below. This growth management analysis is in the very short term, and is not applicable to the future scenarios. mom 5.2 Circulation Plan Chula Vista's Circulation Plan (Figures 5-13W and 5-13E) consists of the physical transportation system, such as streets,- highways; bicycle routes; paths and sidewalks; and of various modes of transportation, such as cars; buses; Bus Rapid Transit(BRT) vehicles;trucks (for goods movement); rail; bicycles; ridesharing; and walking. It is designed to serve the land use patterns and densities described in this General Plan, and depicts the roadway classifications that will serve transportation demand resulting from the complete build-out of the City of Chula Vista. For additional information and policies regarding transportation and transit, refer to Sections 8.0 - 10.0 of this element �Wr Page LUT °'UA 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use Traffic Study Appendix Page e 4 0 'f�� Chula Esta LAND USE AND-TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT Vision CHAPTER 5 2020 The Circulation Plan was analyzed using the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) regional transportation demand model (TRANPLAN Series 10 population and employment forecasts). Technical evaluation was performed to confirm that the system will have sufficient capacity to provide acceptable Levels of Service (LOS). ONE 5.3 Measurement of Traffic, Level of Service (LOS) is a measure of actual traffic conditions and the perception of such conditions by motorists. It is used to describe the average daily number of vehicles on a street relative to the street's vehicular capacity and the resulting effect on traffic There are six defined Levels of Service,A through F, which describe conditions ranging from "ideal"to "worsf, as defined in Table 5-8, Level of Service (LOS) Descriptions, below. TABLE 5-8 LEVEL OF SERVICE(LOS)DESCIIIP T IONS Level of Service Description of Operation (LOS) Traffic is typically free-flowing at average travel speeds, with very A little delay. Vehicles are seldom impeded in their ability to maneuver in the traffic stream.Delays at intersections are minimal. Represents reasonably unimpeded operations at average travel speeds. B The ability to maneuver in the traffic stream is slightly restricted but the majority of vehicles do not stop and it is not bothersome. Represents stable operations with acceptable delays; if an intersection C is signalized, a few drivers may have to wait through one signal cycle. The ability to change lanes and maneuver may be more restricted than LOS B. D Congestion occurs and a small change in volume increases delays substantially during short periods,but excessive backups do not occur. E Congestion occurs with extensive delays on one or more signal cycles and low travel speeds occur. Arterial traffic flows at extremely low speeds, intersection congestion F occurs with excessive delays; and back ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement. In order to determine the LOS for a designated point along a street or at an intersection on a daily basis,the Average Daily Traffic (ADT)volume is compared to the street's intended capacity. This type of LOS analysis is a general indicator of roadway segment performance, and does not take into account intersection operations during peak commuting hours. Table 5-9, Street Segment Performance Standards and Volumes, shows acceptable LOS and volume for various street classfications.The acceptable LOS is C for all street classifications, except for streets in the Urban Core Subarea, which have an acceptable LOS of D. This is discussed fully in Section 5.4, Urban Core Circulation Element PaTe LUT 62 City of Chula Vista General Plan 201`i hird Avenue Mixed Use Traffic Study Appendix Page 5 of 72 Circulation Plan - West Legend = Freeway 6 Lane Major ! \ 4 Lane Major Class 1 Collector ti 1 --. ? vim/ ««+«• Gateway Street(6 Lane) Gateway Street(4 Lane) Str@et ��* Urban Arterial(4 Lane) /J ` a Commercial Boulevard(4 Lane) 4 ••• Downtown Promenade(2/4 Lanes) -x, • - � .� t Other Roads r _ E tree ' ; a • f et St r ►� Z et� t F t{ �f+*_Vii• all : f (� te�ea} t,�0+ * %( �••"` L� C ���� *�``'• ;�ti \Strpel St s V * **�` m e Ue# * Main * Street 0.,o Cil u, Figure 5-13W Page LUT-6341 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use Traffic Study Appendix Page 6 0 r LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT CHAPTER 5 TABLE 5-9 STREET SEGMENT PERFORMANCE STANDARDS AND VOLUMES Street Classification Acceptable LOS Acceptable Volume (ADT) Expressway C 70,000 Prime Arterial C 50,000 Major Street(six lanes) C 40,000 Major Street(four lanes) C 30,000 Town Center Arterial C 50,000 Class I Collector C 22,000 Gateway Street D 61,200 (six lanes) 43,200 (four lanes) Urban Arterial D 37,800 Commercial Boulevard D 33,750 Downtown Promenade D 14,400 A roadway's capacity is primarily a function of the number of lanes provided to carry traffic volumes, and whether or not the roadway is divided with a median or center turn lane. Typically, the more lanes provided,the more capacity the roadway has to accommodate traffic demand. The peak hour capacity of a roadway is influenced by a number of variables, including:the type of intersection controls;signal timing;the presence and frequency of driveways; on-street parking; the percentage of the daily traffic in the peak hour,the direction of traffic in the peak hour; and other factors. 5.3.1 Analyzing and Measuring Traffic Impacts The City of Chula Vista conducts traffic analyses and planning through a three-tiered system that allows the City to cover a broad range of time frames and conditions spanning from 20-year future forecasts,to near-term project evaluations, to actually driving the roadways to determine real-time current performance. These three analyses have different degrees of precision in determining impacts based on several considerations which include: the type of project being considered; the study years chosen;whether the analysis will consider short-term impacts, long- term impacts or both; and whether the analysis is being conducted to satisfy a CEQA requirement or is strictly a City traffic review. ..iW Page LUT-65 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use Traffic Study Appendix Page 7 o r Appendix C Proposed Roadway Improvements 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use Traffic Study Appendix Page 8 of 72 C/) co < to (1) U) 0 .0 4-- C: U) < 0 C: —j m r_ 0 0 — CY) -0 = Co-C 0 U) 0 co 0- 0 0) (L) 06 0 CL 0 - (1) CI*4 < < 0 C0 .2 Q) C/) U) Cf) (D 0- Cl) 0 _j (D m 0 0 0 L- 0 0 L) 0 L) 4— -0 m n 0 L) -J Cor- cn > -0 (r, < > 0 u co 5, C: o m tr_- E 42 -Fu m U) — m co >, Z F— :5. cm < < rr < C: a) Co cn < 4- >,> 0 C/) C: w .2- ch H CD tiS - 0 M -0 — r- co U- mcn a) 0 (D 6 w E o o M QZ U) < U) 0, I a) m o 0 r) - a) m c (n cl) (n cl) 2i L- 0- [-- C: 75; U: a) C: > M -j CO a) I-- - =3 Lo -3 Q) co Lo Lo U) > C:) 0 F- C/) 0 0 0 E u) o a < C) C a) C) M —I-- C) CD C) LL (D N N a) C) > 0 0 4— -0 - !E cr > m a) Li- " = - I-- C 0 C: = n" a- ce) 0 0 -6 0 -5 :E 70 0 m 0� co 0 E C/) L- > C0 F. 0 " -0 - T E3 = -0 c = -0 c 3: 0 E -0 0 , 0 t5 L- (1) 1 U- a) , (1) a) 0 -0 co C14 a) 0 _0 Co M a) -a 0. C/) w - a) � 0- = - CL CL E En -,z 4- 4— E It m (D CU z (D (D I 0 -0 (D a), E � m co M 0") uj 0- m -J C: 0 0- -0 +- C—D "T -0 U- C6 U) :E C/) -0 0 =3 0 c C co m co C/) -0 -0 -0 -0 (n uj in - 0 U) a) CO cn (D W U) U) > 0 a) < C') 0 a) (Do 0) U) 0 M 0 E- -j CL _j 0 0 E -�8 m cn (D -0 E E 0)-j Lo cf) co co Cf) o CD -0 =3 1 0 CY) 0 m —N C) c) m 0- C.0 C -3 2 o CO (n a) D "T 75 C: N CY) 0 L) 0 0 CL L) M < La .1) -�j < co C) E, -0 0 < io 0 L a) a) = J- 57 LO a) Q) (1) 4- 0 M Q) -r a ON o m to U- m co R cu E m 0 v U) Q) = :3 -0 4- C: C: U) 7:3 > U) Q) _2 0 0 0 > 0 U) > (L) 0 C: U) 0 -0 -0 o)-o a) 01- ❑ OsOL L- _a LLJ 0 Fn U) U) =3 CL U) 0 Q) 0) -0 Cl) 0 > -0 X x LU 0LL O a coa r- U) C: ❑ a) (D 0 = a) 0 a) 0 a) 0- a) cn —m 4- M 7E) CD < CU ❑ c-_ uj A� C) 0 a) L- a) E E E C) x a) > co 0 CD > a) CD c CL > 0 0 > 0 a a) 0 0 0 0 4 U) 0 U) U) 7a) CO m -0 g > U, 0 > C.) C)C= = 4- 0 CL w A� x 0 -0 o :3 m 0 -7m-- U)uj C: -0 %- -W C: CD 0 4� = cn cu - U) N0 w ujM = 0 a) a) w uj () E 2 C: 0 L) -0 = > U) =3 a 0 0 2 a) C/) C-) > -0 -0 0 M 0 0 0--o < C: cn C: > cn co 0 tn -0 0 p: E < z _0 ->, a) co Z C C: a) 0) I_ 0 a: m m > CO Lo 0 0 0 -a .- Ul) F- W co F- (1) - F- C: t= C-L (>I) =� �O " =3 = (D m 7E3 0 =3 " m E " C a 0 CN .0) 0 T- = X 04 0 C) :3 C) < m m M Cq U m U) co Cu U) Appendix D City Funded Project[TF-397 E Street Median] 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use Traffic Study Appendix Page 10 of 72 19 1WHI TJ5 OVUM du "Am q 1§10.1 P. H C0 Al . ........ ....... ...".. LA ............. -_1A C) loot Kit 1 ,15 lip II SO T5.1 n. .ms Rgd full M 11 6A tz lot 111 ink lip slahl in", fit 1111 1111 1 OIL oil 111—R511 :9: INN . 4 j In 'j 11 RUN flum 51 RIPPI ONE Owl I R. I 61- 1, Oil WIN to MIN I F u i q; jigs in Ingi jig; 11 yl y4ps 41 121 201 1TTd Avenue Mixed Use Traffic Study Appendix Page 11 of 72 ' ! � | � ' � � 2O1Third Avenue Mixed Use Traffic Study Appendix Page 13uf72 Appendix Transit Route Details 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use Traffic Study Appendix Page 14 of 72 haw. �a a rte,. m 961 963 a. 4' ra _ _... : ^ a t Die 0 F a! Cie;I'll LJ W4 V4 Lrig � . . m� tea ' , .. 114A it�f Ti m m� m ,ate , 03, 70 r U Ca , ,2 r 1ego Bilue Line f, lOr 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use Traffic Study Appendix Page 15 of 72 Ln �. _ E _ ,w w o � � °3 a_ o IN �' o � a vMJ a UIM N �p "N Q vtt N a c c,o�N t d Z V E d LL, S N L m y d y o�a o • _ C `m` c d N N ++ L O) a�oo i ty �- L t/') w m m W O O > -p `� N c 0 O- N t!J N E_m c c L c tL6 O Ll m V1 + {A E:=:= Q E ('Q Q Y c 61 0 ZU 0 0 J CL cll a Ln cOv� U LL, U = _ to \� •> y. -�-+ N L/) U LnE o- Ln i M N 0 +� Q E�oo > (Q 0 )- > N V o'o ma ++ U `c a c G a Ln 6 -_0 V r O L ® �- m Eomc N'o O, O Ln O r OrnE w m _0 4-1 Q r v�`o am N ° O O oco a N IOA � O-1O E H R L 4-+ N CO LA c�o Ln cq V N In n n P E N m O � G C +p+ L voNE°1 M M N co N Ln O MALL ++ ,.�-, N N n N Ln st N c E O i t o� w u ad, / uv°tea P P co U P 0� 01 01O. O r r pc c- 3c:r r T 2 O N i Q lt, %0 .o co ,o .r �o `o .o ° 3 .y 3 c o p o f uo�e un uo sa eJado a no Q $ w m `p o ( I P S ; )EOL ; 21 v E c a u T ;u!od jeoueJ;jo/pue;wodaw!l O o tT F G H c 1- a t7 zj 0 O c u c u m O m m '5'f ° c E ;u!od Ja}sued O C + v 'L 0`C LO o m G m C C7 G c ,- _ m _ E ° w o Ln a ° c~° E c� Ea r,°o }S uieW aup an18' c a y ° s y o Q '� G~ `o'� ^ m Ja;ua�oaf!■ > o •L O i Q.o o cr m -O c .m o m c m 3 c ew Q Q .Lalua�;!suejl >,-2 '° c ` m m m o a ° aan a) ' 199.E}S uewo�ed c m m v o m m G a c o 3 n y aBueu M S d/ Jewo e 1.,r m o �, o d _ m _0 m Ln _ E G ejIu u3 �a OJL y C y C N U C ++ C G q c D o a m E O m u- H m - u Lu m o m o o y �' w m . c Ev my m c _ @ Woe 5 ti S= U Ln Ln -j O F LL nm L°t� m y F >rs d■ s z m I _ c >e` O\Qa d.,i5 C) Lo oa ° C 0 C 0 o N _ o 0 0 v c deN V. Ln N r m N 0o .p q=ty m+m. m '1S Sa\ _ i> ifl EA if} w t\ r M o m N o w ER lfl ER a sa m ms�.� . LL � dmob m dv°� L SOL) aA m m rn Un m m Nd =y m[Zm m m u O (0 U m O ;v �^ �ail m e O w c p c O 'p ° yTmo� �E�a°-u S 0 awlan18' .L o E c c m ° m Ja ua Isueu S o m uu N ° " Q) m °� �Nnv "�°O Jaua ya? o o o m ° ¢ y o else el 4J u .2" `- m� 'c E m� o_ m t m c m m m u looy:)s P!W o0 o a ) O m O o t7 i m ° a H ° ° 3 m 0 O-$`°V c dd ■ I 4 S IPP.W ■ �T u m u u 'r) tn u.v 0 4Nm d a °U ° U =`o RPH �S e;SLA e1n_4J m m> > a Q v o n ° ° v m�?o O ■ e1rdso m m m H H 0. h° m m � " a m °. C m C c a'm o I H TI N y �. c m -, G 7" ■—sdduos +_ D EL �._ !c c v� m � E mr Lu _0(> i m a. ri o°.. c 0�-a.o � -'' """ a cB o LL m m c Q E a� m a-2 m o y �IJed a - m m Fm o ` a to � o o :9 Z v° E m = a° U S•H■ N !euowaW■ •;da4 ao!lod Li c yc m ° to Nc �w ou o achm do ) ]S M I \ pt m Q m O Nm Q cUm� 5ma nm �ILH — _ Id�1 d, ■ N v rnv m 0o G o Do o.c t7 0 ° m HN ao a fl��Jed ■ ■Ja;uaD T Lu m + a 4. ^o m o w o o y.=�E o - ✓N ewJoN■ 8 ■ o!n!� 3 QG v Ll. O'o dS v J -O O+ O `o m T N-o m m`o o-o �(JeJ ) 'O >, o Ln� Q m m c m`QVO ` - - co LL a m u e r = v y °m Ln m y m o Ly> c o u!eW O N mu 3 ° inN N` N 4=T.."O ypm Glp SCJ = y`m_ LLQ >� OO `_ 3 �'' OO sC •5m Q um"i o m om1?m� 7 C9 - +�m a m to mE c , m -° ° O v cm 3> my �°�� °m02)o�P Q m Du Q = �ea� uumtr e° U w N cR V> Q to�c )-'� O Q°Q O_ FE Z} O ft' - - 1 • • . • • • . - H Street T.C. ®► Hilltop Drive all Palomar Street T.C. Palomar Street T.C. Hilltop Drive®► H Street T.C. H St. F St. Hilltop Dr. Hilltop Dr. Hilltop Dr. Main St. Palomar St. Palomar St. Main St. Hilltop Dr. Hilltop Dr. Hilltop Dr. F St. H St. Transit Ctr. & & & & & Transit Ctr. Transit Ctr. & & & & & Transit r. DEPART 3rd Av. J St. Palomar St. Orange Av. 3rd Av. ARRIVE DEPART 3rd Av. Orange Av. Palomar St. J St. 3rd Av. ARRIYZ 5:34a 5:42a 5:48a 5:54a 5:56a 6:00a 6:09a 5:45a 5:53a 5:58a 6:01a 6:06a 6:12a 6:21!�3 6:04 6:12 6:18 6:24 6:26 6:30 6:39 6:15 6:23 6:28 6:31 6:36 6:42 6:5p- 6:34 6:42 6:48 6:54 6:57 7:02 7:11 6:30 6:40 6:46 6:49 6:54 7:00 7:17 6:49 6:57 7:03,_. 7:09 7:12 7:17 7:26 6:45 6:55, 7:01 7:04 7:09 .. 7:15 7:2 f 7:04 7:14 7:22 7:28 7:31 7:37 7:46 7:00 7:10 7:16 7:19 7:24 7:30 7 a(W 7:19 7:29 7:37 7:43 7:46 7:52 8:01 7:15 7:25 7:31 7:34 7:39 7:45 7:5QL 7:34 7:44 7:52 7:58 8:01 8:07 8:16 7:30 7:40 7:46 7:49 7:54 8:00 8:10 7:49 7:59 8:07 8:13 8:16 8:22 8:31. 7:44 7:54 8:00__ 8:03 8:08 8:14 .8:25 8:04 8:14 8:22 8:28 8:31 8:37 8:46 7:59 809 8:15 8:18 8:23 8:29 8:40 8:19 8:29 8:37 8:43 8:46 8:52 9:01 8:13 8:23 8:29 8:32 8:37 8:43 8:54 8:34 8:44 8:52 8:58 9:01 9:07 9:16 8:28 8:38 8:44 8:47 8:52 8:58 9:09 8:49 8:59 9:07 9:13 9:16 9:22 .. . .9:31 8:43. 8:53 8:59. 9:02 9:07 9:13. 9:24 AND THEN EIN VERY 15 MUTES AT:/Y LUEGO CADA 15 MINUTOS A LA: 8:58 :08 99:14 9:17 9:22 9:28 9:39 :04 :14 :22 :28 :31 :37 :46 AND THEN EVERY 15 MINUTES AT:/Y LUEGO CADA 15 MINUTOS A LA: :19 :29 :37 :43 :46 :52 :01 :13 :23 :29 :32 :37 :43 :54 :34 _ _.;44.. .. :52.... :58,__ :01. :07... ..:16 :28._._ . :38_ _. .;44.. ... ..:47. .. ;521. .... . :58 :09 . 44 :59 :07 :13 :16 :22 :31 43 :53 :59 :02 :07 :13 :24 UNTIL:/HASTA: :58 :08 :14 :17 :22 :28 :39 2:19p 2:29p 2:37p 2:43p 2:46p 2:52p 3:01p UNTIL:/HASTA: 2:34 _ 2:44 2:52 _3:00 3:03 3:09 3:18 2:28p 2:38p 2:44p 2:47p 2:54p 3:00p _ .3:11p 2:44 2:59 3:07 3:15 3:18 3:24 3:33Z43 2:53 2:59 3:02 3:09 3:15 3:26 3:04 3:14 3:22 3:29 3:32 3:38 3:47 2:58 3:08 3:14 3:17 3:24 3:30 3:41 3:19 3:29 3:37 3:44 3:47 3:53 4:02 3:13 3:23 3:30 3:34 3:39 3:45 3:56 3:34 3:44 3:52 3:59 4:02 4:08 4:17 3:28 3:38 3:45'' .3:49 _ 3:54 4:00 4:11 3:49 3:59 4:07 4:14 4:17 4:23 4:32 3:43 3:53 4:00 4:04 4:09 4:15 4:26 4:04 4:15 4:23 4:29 4:32 4:38 4:47 3:58 4:08 4:14 4:17 4:22 4:28 4:39 4:19 4:30 4:38 4:44 4:47 4:53 5:02 4:13 4:23 4:29 4:32 4:37 4:43 4:54 4:34 4:45 4:53 4:59 5:02 5:08 5:17 4:28 4:38 4:44 4:47 4:52 4:58 . 5:09 4:49 5:00 5:08 5:14 5:17 5:23 5:32 4:43 4:53 4:59 5:02 5:07 5:13 5:24 5:04 5:15 5:23 5:29 5:31 5:35 5:44 4:58 5:08 5:14 5:17 5:22 5:28 5:39 5:19 5:30 5:38 5:44 5:46 5:50 5:58 5:13 5:23 5:29 5:32 5:37 5:43 5:54 5:34 5:45 5:53 5:59 6:01 6:05 6:13 5:28 5:38 5:44 5:47 5:52 5:58 6:09 6:04 6:15 6:23 6:24 6:31 6:35 6:43 5:58 6:06 6:11 6:14 6:19 6:25 6:33 6:34 6:45 6:53 6:59 7:01 7:05 7:13 6:28 6:36 6:41 6:44 6:49 6:54 7:02 7:19 7:28 7:34 7:40 7:42 7:46 7:54 7:15 7:23 7:28 7:31 7:36 7:41 7:49 8:04 8:13 8:19 8:25 8:27 8:31 8:39 8:00 8:07 8:12 8:15 8:20 8:25 8:33 8:49 8:58 9:04 9:16 9:12 9:16 9:24 8:52 8:54 4:64 9:07 9:12 9:17 945 9:30 9:39 9:45 9:51 9:53 9:57 10:05 9:30 9:37 9:42 9:45 9:50 9:55 10:03 10:30 10:39 10:45 10:51 10:53 10:57 11:05 H Street T.C. 00 Hilltop Drive 00 Palomar Street T.C. Palomar Street T.C. Hilltop Drive H Street T.C. © © Q 0 H St. F St. Hilltop Dr. Hilltop Dr. Hilltop Dr. Main St. Palomar St. Palomar St. Main St. Hilltop Dr. Hilltop Dr. Hilltop Dr. F St. H Std Transit Ctr. & & & & & Transit Ctr. Transit Ctr. & & & & & Transit Er. DEPART 3rd Av. J St. Palomar St. Orange Av. 3rd Av. ARRIVE DEPART 3rd Av. Orange Av. Palomar St. J St. 3rd Av. ARRIUII. 6:54a 7:03a 7:09a 7:14a 7:17a 7:21a 7:28a 6:59a 7:06a 7:11a 7:14a 7:19a 7:25a 7:3 7:54 8:03 8:09 8:14 8:17 8:21 8:28 7:59 8:06 8:11 8:14 8:19 8:25 8:34�, 8:54 9:03 9:09 9:14 9:17 9:21 9:28 8:59 9:06 9:11 9:14 9:19 9:25 9:3:g 9:54 10:03 10:09 10:14 10:17 10:21 10:28 9:59 10:06 10:11 10:14 10:19 1,0:25, 10:36) 16:54 11:03 11:09 11:14 11:17 11:21 11:28 10:59 11:66 11:11 11:14 11:19 11:25 11:34, 11:54 12:03p 12:09p 12:14p 12:17p 12:21p 12:28p 11:59 12:06p 12:11p 12:14p 12:19p 12:25p 12:34- 12:54p 1:03 1:09 1:14 1:17 1:21 1:28 12:59p 1:06 1:11 1:14 1:19 1:25 1:3 1:54 2;03 2:09 2:14 2:17 2:21 2:28 1:59 2:06 2:11 2:14 2:19 2:25 2:3_ 2:54 3:03 3:09 3:14 3:17 3:21 3:28 2:59 3:06 3:11 3:14 3:19 3:25 3:3f 3:54 4:03 4:09 4:14 4:17 4:21 4:28 3:59 4:06 4:11 4:14 4:19 4:25 4:3Z) 4:54 5:03 5:09 5:14 5:17 5:21 5:28 4:59 5:06 5:11 5:14 5:19 5:25 5:3 5:54 6:03 6:09 6:14 6:17 6:21 6:28 5:59 6:06 6:11 6:14 6:19 6:25 6:31 6:54 7:03 7:09 7:14 7:17 7:21 7:28 6:59 7:06 7:11 7:14 7:19 7:25 7:3E 7:54 8:03 8:09 8:14 8:17 8:21 8:28 7:59 8:06 8:11 8:14 8:19 8:25 8:34D 8:54 9:03 9:09 9:14 9:17 9:21 9:28 8:59 9:06 9:11 9:14 9:19 9:25 9:3,R O Route 701 does not operate on Sunday.Alternative Sunday service may include Routes 703,712,929,or 932. I- Ruta 701 no opera los domingos.Servicio alternativo de domingo puede incluir las rutas 703,712, 929,o 932. o N A Saturday or Sunday schedule will be operated on the following holidays and observed holidays New Year's Day,Presidents'Day, Se operara con horario de sabado o domingo durante los siguientes d(as festivos y feriados observados »> Memorial Day,Independence Day, Labor Day,Thanksgiving,Christmas o Ln o o _• L o O O O -a ___...._... W W w0 o O N �= O O O N m cin o 69 {A to N b a=i `m.y m Lei. `oa O m N m -No.m ON c _ ro OUcNm c, tU m m m N d-°N r EL 4 X m V O:� U 0 o d 12 m V-.Q.O, O O'o O cmi m_Q� U oja O� U u,� W u OQ da cE y do0 0 `m r 0, z ' L m •�E .° O :O ?i d/a° °•$'°-o C (a O p 4; C o� m uu n� y U �o m � 0�j� o��� °O .� Q c O c c "d m O fC =p D.. O'c m-p w m U m U m`o t 0 e Ln m ym ' m� a- CL o ° H hao > v V m �� o $ 0- C m c N �" a y O \ m U a c m'^ d Ln A '- -CC- �e �- mQ Za N m� yw �°M 3 ago° c`omn'p N -= v o c N \ W m E c Q EOUN ° a'mmo W ' NQ = 0 \ LL o \ �,� `ma N m,� 3� o°-° ZUo ^ � aacwm m o U,= O >m m m Z Lo ro a cn d 'rnv o ; a o Oo a°c Nc, L7 a i o- 0 z=CN ao LaiONNG � � N u � .N �v Ll fN d,$ m � ofN co �N K LU °: �� WdOO..° Q > > � •r U c f Q c ya ° Ln -� Q �� �� °v N m m m O m aau° U Lo LL c 1 Z m > a r.0 Z co _m O Q L m mu Lv ` Lm NN vm Ln ° covmm L-' L N m o o0 3 f' 00 sc m Q m o o°na N Q S t N AP N '(" mE c m .0«. -0 m 3> O• �„ m 0- W U U U t!i axUO �n U 0 Q Ln Q �• • • • • V w G �Ln Q o Q O I--�Z7 d o LA °M N O co 0 V N Ou Gr f., v 4" v porn M M N co Ln Ln Ln M c LL 'i'' � ° C C 3 ( m e N N N � Ln N Ln N F E io O ,u` 'm O v m m (.1 m°ry P P OD P O• 6 o' O,m "O O u`>1= L. - rU u' - c.� t 00 r r �.� ��y., of m U� v v m .Q'Oy O •L Fa in a�G` m o v m s ut -0,�j O o ■ y�/ ■ W c ip d v ° Y •� v lb u b my J�4 4 7�e�IPaw c'^ C L c u V > o-o 0) CL mo Ln v c i a ■ ■ A . Q I c P Ue�aUl ° 'U - ■� o m v oY p O c c m o _m o p c as •L o m c co cmc 07 - r m`o F • N cc c GP� va +O+ m m O`w c o m a 0\01,16e, �? to U E � ° m �o� aQ Hm ° o F- ■ l c4 '^ d \ NO Q•� c w4? ay.. 01 a N,n 5e P \\` �`-- o h d Q O 'o �' d N a •j °m C U c'O c mm ° `oma y ov �a E m , r Fo m e Ln u s x c °Q Z, ° } y \ 6 m O _ ;p 41 y `O L CL Uv O O :Q C v m•w ... \ 01� .n c m O OX, m ,O r0 LL O ++ H U P O.p Q� o >� - E'a': i do W O 4l 0 0 of i w H•"' = v c E a m Ln a C - l v v C 7 N R 0-t] 0 OL = m F•- o �6 ,� E X Q ti _ _ U try to O f- Ll 0- LL tD O Ln S „� Hilltop Dr ° H r NL\\to O U - N� CL o o 49 d a � LL 3rd Av m v CO c:4cr _ 1 tsi L� — 3ra P* Q o 15 u� a Ln o a Co 0 �-- � \ �u� �� E a� N ^^'' Y �CI� ■ • Nm W Y O ■ U Ln (DO BLr) W � X s N � NQ E s 2 — N 0, LL c c DOF- 0.Z R '� L LL • Lb U O ° c p E=3 CU � a $ ° Noy 0 hva • _ � RoQ U o o G O o v Y o 4' m E o s �° E o m �co U •> a R oadvaay opd\aim P E- - _ o c° M s o QCD jE :j4 Lil L Q d v nV c o O U2ic j wLI 5m >tev�dm av>°o ' O r '0 L TN r�o. LUa Lu 7t NLP IN M N MN 9 T 9 M q M q M q T OM 9 M 9 MO I 4n IMM Ln = .. .. Q) LU n o N N M m01.00 N N MM 1' r W W-0 �o P,M 0, Q) uj x 6 r��cb P.O6�o .0 rl co 0T 41 c (1) ~ Q) U u ±2 Al Q Ln c Ln m g a a) lzr It Mm mm co m co co 00 m 0000000 'o N 04 N 0 4?IN NN Lf?IN In &i-b b h N 65 M- 0",�,, - - - N CY- N Cli Cl)M It MM P,co TV) �o rl 00 T c uj LU c M in o m O CL C� CN CNN CII)M M N 0 Q 10�O'0`O`000 CO 0000 W 00 00 .0 MMM Cl CN(N 10 M Ml NN N0 C,M C� C)mOM OM OmO MO.T 9 T q m 9 In y mOvgsp 9 QO :0000 %r-tt M W �o N M 01. N co of 0 �o r,co P C z 0 U E 47 uD LU Q cc co t5 V CL E u tn in m ,,m M CII C-4 CII W �T �010�o�o�o�o N N N N rs N rN N cli N m - cN Lp cN p cN Lp cN Lp cN Lp cN L!� Ln c:i%q cl T��!4�cN Lp N in c4 @ In IN CN(N -2-2 m M LP Ln LP If!T T T C�N C)-r- Q) m m'o'o N N m w 0'c-0 0 �2 N N m m-e-0 w w"o N w C' a) Ln 0 N CO PJ:Ln 10 hCO MM U-C -160,Cl U U w , 0 Z 0 M M N 0, Z ol -C V) < CL m m m m MM M M-T-�r�t�t q M M N N �0 0 w I C�,t 'A O N 60b.- V 7:15t 7:I!t !t T:"A 7:1 7:7 O�i- .c� VO' d''o'0 r,N M M 0.OPO�D �l N N M M V It W M.0,0 NM O� 2= r�: o Ln 10 N co -C 0 r�l Q) LU R +1 +j > c c uj Q) Q) z U >: U LU 0 0 < -0 0. 7 41 ......M7.....v v cq cn m z cn cn cn m 9 m 9 m 9 T 99 cn m 9 m 9 T 9 m 9 T T 9(n 000 N 0, M 0 Q N N M M 0-0, M-t-t Ln W-0�O N Mp -0 12 z An�o r,c* n-V A 0 0 u Ei Q) A Q) to d Lr) IN 0,0,0, @ u �i 0- w Z o 0�0, 0. 16 p 0, m m w co w m m w co co co w w co w doom w w 00 co co co coco w co co 00 w w co E0 OO E U cN�q cN-'NLP'N LP'NLP CN q�cN f N q!'N'fl�'!T'-N!If!N Lf?�,!T T f Ln E CN CN N E- CNI ' v;N C, Lu m m N r,w w Ol ol�D N N N N M M-�r sr M W�o-0 N,2 _2'in UA -�5 r�-:Cb(5� Ln 10 rl 00 CL CL IL C to 0 in uj @ �6u> '0 OP OPO -�T r, m m m v)Ln v)v) o TSO:g -O�: E-= '5:cN Ln M .. .. ..cn '5: '¢7:'5t 7:7t r'� It IN 7: -- E�2= M OHO .0 M 01 C, C-4 N N M M It 0 0�O 0 NW 0, @N 66 6-(5 h +j 41 c c Q) W U u 0 C CL V) o- C: 0 CD N N N CN CN r N Nmmmwwwwg�oorl rl < Q 00�o'0�o M N M CN Le CN Ln Ln M 9 rn (n I?IP IR IR<9 'CR IR IR 9 3: n m r,- 00, o f, 6i b b N 00 M C,01 0 ;Z C-4 N N M M IT-�T 0 W-0 10 N W O� N m 0. 10 rl co ol C) 0 -0 x 4-; E to V) 0 CL --2 o D_ Eco 0 m < N,•2 m�2 '0'0'o'o`a.0�0�-e-T-T.0.0�o.0 cn w D.0� E PPC C� 'D 0�0�0� 'o Lo Ln (�� 0 2 LP L!�Ln LO CD (D 0 "'5: Ln cN Ln CN Ln(�f f?cN Ln cN Ln(N 4� 4�(N - - .. ..<IR CR Le T T 0 Lo'o'o N N m m 0'0' �2 N N m m w w�o N N m 0 0 .0'o N co - 0 CL 2E 0 (D CL -a 0 S (D N CD LU -0 M+ Ln o cl- N N N N N zt zr•o o o o o� m m m in Ln Ln Ln en co r4 o o C: N Cli N M m m N N 0 :3 u LO )L� Q.0:� @ 2 O p m'R m 7 7: !t 7 �7: �7: 'It 7:IR�?Ln @ Lf� T 4?T T 10 m w Ol Ol 0 0 N N--NcqmmvvwmONN M U ONm:of Ln�O r,co U U um V) z -1 -C u • u w • F- C) X rL 5; _0 Q) a C,�,0 C)LO 0 N N T 10-0 NO�O O�04 a- a Ln 0 0� 0� c_0 W �5 0_ C4 Ln N 0 C5,:0,!t-�t ;r-5.5 CNEPCN qCl�qCp CR Cn(R M Ln(NIP (2 M 9 In M M M:�� 0 .. .. .. .. .. (uD NNm w C�0 0 N N m v-t w in o�b�z 0- 10 N "n.2 a) >- Ln�o r,co Z 3: w LU Lo o is> LU (a > ■ z • < uj 0, 0, -�r 0 0 mmcnm < mmmm <�6, CN'O O N 1� 7t 7t 15 •T In In m T in m < [2 o b P�,r�:66 cb 6:C�(5 6 N N N M M It Ln W�Q N W -5 3: 6 rZ�Ci�6�Z Ln�o rl co F- < V u Q) N Ln C: ii CL r MOo... v - . u N N N N C-4 N C11 N �O�O o o C)m 0 m 0 M CD 1, "T ..'V 1 .gyp.O o *,o -b b�,r�,cb cb&:&,6 6 MM 4 i 6-0n CC LU UJ -b r:�Cb P -b h& • Ln V) ui w zV) • I,• ,n ® Ln a oz w oLn ' _ �e5 ui O m cmcm Ln R D J' • c L ■ .� j -00 0 r O °o Um c0 y 0 c _ S • N G 10 N c �'�' am„Lo LLI O C N n- c m 73 U > z .t t (1) 4- tpUil �a c ca •N y =� co > _ L • in W CO M 0 • o • • m .t2 O moo ooDo o u'�i o Doo Sova E •� p� 0 N O O 00 a M! Lo .O 0 M O o'' O 0 m+-. to 010 M Ln V v V V N M — mE' U u '0'u'+ 'a LL y C M M N 000 N {^A N O M l� '{'' FF,- 0 � C: C p ■ N N 1l •O H Ln d' 7 N 3 i E m E 'u t- O -C■ m m o ED 03 a O m a m 0 L 0 p U 7 0- C: Q O W Oj .0) Q a o O O 3 � U .�_. 2,1 Ea a m u mo a °c to a) r✓1 4 it C L 5 O �° ■ a D7 F C y ` F -0a () EN� C .v �- o ,� ° r m c = c c c'm u LL U Y U O E I r- m m m:' C o :5 ff my H w ` 3 :3 Q O L U E 1n �J O O fl. y '0 o N cn y m b o y to � l� . cao = et m\ o Q'm o c m c 111 �. cm y Nm 2 � m a-a E m a m e vi v c +` c o a m .° L� r. 0 h 'O D n i :o `D'm u o Q) y 0 °-° c m c ,:h o Rd cm D o CL � 0 a u o m Fu Romeo ' O 0% a U of �.a w � y•� ) °gym F`- �= � m o � � ,Y bd o LLI 01 O 1- m 0 0 y l w N ' m L C -0 m vi' C40 -E U n u6i O IS- ii a` ° _ ° o I • — OG/d Q\alb V c uC7 ° Le 4n u 7 _ ' a, co c7 a m C) mcr-•E xm R hm 0 * C) m m O N O ¢ o O O O -0 y d m O N O O O m a. iA to EA w-� t\ r M o - w ER tfi 4A -o -0 m m CL '6 N a O zS m cu 13' C: oUc�m N 3"'O L m m y V m ONS = XC m C> U m •O m �' �'CLQ°-C a U O y 'p 0 ° O1 m `off arE� m° PV m c Y 4 E= C -m0 m y.° 'QU elm 3<d - O c U p `^v O m •� s•m a— to c c H N • J) u 0"m .� N� C E m D ° m t m Q c m m al," $ Ec m Q'm O y Q "Oa= a � Q `m-o�m V.N.j Qo •> _ to y m U tom U 0` m d H C f0 J� i 4� v pm.� _0 �y � m \ � y c mm mUE v-mc`°�'m^ N i _ llf :'a' N_ iC o m\n z tJJ m� m E a Q E aU w m 0o o- o fC Nay m c \ LL c F m tc `m v t/1 m'c c ° c'G Z v o m ma°c m Bead s .0w T m '0» y m oO am O.cU d9 >mmury �v7 v rn a m D o c Q o D o �c tiu o �O c = vin P c m I n„r w 0 m- � 0 » O. 0 � o cm o " Qm d\a m + m .6 �- cp +m me $m w o > � o° °�do`o°o` Ct �f- Q F� ' � LQL a m� m S'n c = Q Zo �� -o° ul . > m o a'�c°o N U m `) m m v� ° °m o +' a aN w ;, . ym m Q worm ovnm� cC � o Z = 0o Ym o9 0 ° m m.c m HTa m _ to 01 mC L '.W Z. m Ov O N� U� ,�,_ Q cnGc Y-� 0m 0 ¢ 0¢ �E°�z+mo '~ v W *.� Q LU> m m to Lo Ln Lo m m m M Lo m m LO m N m m:m O O O N`�. O O O o < 000 ... ®N rx Ln N N N N N m N m N N m V V Ln Ln Ln Ln N m m i �V— W•�= 'O h r co (T P O'O r r N m b %O h h CO U 0 W•� ® C CO CO P W.h h O. tq m J U rn •Nm O m' 3 •- r Z 00 cW 00 cc) r Omo>= ' ' ' ' ' • -Ou rO c 'T It 1* — rtr -IT rec di -Z z °0 y T h 3, m Co P 1� r�z 0 . .o _ N I® ? c tU n o o p w c CL W2 m m m m m m m m m m m M M m M M M e! -T v 0' 0� P c v o o o M'O O coo z eT0 * U :°dSo d• r a j d' 7 et r 1 r It r.Q et r d' r et r of N N N U °df l7 O m O Q C2 O T:0 M 2 ■ Om co r, L\ m 00 LT 0, o-O � � c.¢ :Ln �o 1oh nco 0P O O•o a00 c00, b:n 1� O Cl m U m o U _m O m O p _ �¢ W" FQ .0O m m -2 9 m d-J Q 4' m : Q n E m m m m m co co co 00 co co m co >. co co 00 co 0, O� P cr 'e of d o ° m n n y:m m m m m � + 'c C2 O m O.Rf O m O:0') O m 0 M O =:M O M O M N N N = N ® m 0 C m N m �.N m Nm N Q 0' N mo-m 'o h N m m P P O O � F- �:m �0 %O h h C7 P O U O dam h m m F: J 1 � h L Q F i-' Q F m u F LU= _ ro v m > 0 m Lin 3 v U P 0, P ^2 P -P O •F; �3`m • tL"Y a Y I I ^ 100 ol I I a I I N I LO 110 I I I I I W Qo Y I I cn I I I I I � oL } W 8 66 O m co O > CLLI r D _O m .> d 'N -p �' Z, C 3 0 N Ln 'Ln m m Lo W m m � 0 N W_ O m O LL ",� � I I N N I N I:N I N ZN ry I N I I I I I ° LL ��� _ a zJ U O'er m P r W m •o m O I I �-. I I I I I H h E N Z: m O co O Q n Q) N Z 0.. d N C Q C O N y rna' .� .� O �O �O co G m'p COs="Ow I ^ Icolo oI I LoIzI i 1I I OsoW I I I I I I I o o "5VO �- r m cVp ^ t H O L^ Ln K -0_0 O N t_ N N� EE � m O O CL y LT7 to Ln Ln Ln N N m -m LO QQrQ Co r Ln IINacIIIISQ NOohP � Num � N TO � � N o U �� m d g c'a N to v Ln Ln Ln m m Ln O Ln m m ¢ � lN co to l " Int I In; oI I I I I QJoyl I IoI I I I I � p� Tm'c V 1 O°tsm �afm Ln ?: c .°, 0 Cj ' to O m� I I I ¢(n 1 =0o3 NN O .O ¢ 0 'O N CO LT o LO .o 3: U m @` VT 0 O O of M w 4 co LU tnJ • 0 al c y Ln to m M m m In m m m m m >. Ln m = m m m M h N N N m .;° N N N �•• N N ¢ N N N > 3 m O '� c N Ln N Ln N N N m N Ln N Lo N Li 1 :N m N m M N N N 0 �'c Ln N to �:N m = N m N ++ O p„m .p •o ri ri co Co U P:O O r r J Ln LA `o 10 ri t70 lT O m O d m Ll co co f-. �o �O t\ m OU Q � c N r h • N Q F- •Ln Z a) n Z W Mrn • m Z_ d ,� a b 'o 'o ' 'o 'o •O <) 'o �O �O �O m P cf' at of m d' V' d' �c et d• et V' et e c NN mfO oTS C7 � a 7 V r V r 7t 7 a r 7. Or 7� "r et ref' N r r IT: OU 'm CD r VY- 'O 00 �ro.�do' h N a63 o r • toc N'Lp, 0 m Occ Cl) co } O 0 Lu ro ■ mac^ W ■ �c� W • Q O 5,y_ m Wi v m W d O • s." o= .- r �- r r r 0 d' O. 0+ P o=' O O O 0 0 O O O to C"5 c T r ct �- d' r V r cl' V a' Z �- V r e1' r et N O O O O m > V' d' _"c- �t r et r p SQL o o r: r, co co 6� 6T (5(5 = m to 10 �o n co LT o Qa o� r, 66 b O �o vi � c Q U W.�V r F- U W V Z O • !_ Z • � a • N Q m L = d v O h 1 N Ln L!7 Ln In Ln Ln Ln m Ln Ln Ln Ln Lo m m m m m 0• V ed' v 1 N n m Ln Lo Lo m m m Ln 1 y F- Q u o m o m o m o m o m o m o m o L1 o M r o 0 o H Q nU m o m o rn o M 0 c O W W �O �iU n r; Cil co LT LT o CO �- Lri Lri �O �O n t:O P O O W••--W � Lb co �O �O t� O �p r .- r r .N O • W t` W CASH FARES/Tarifas an efectivo DIRECTORY/Directorio Effective SEPTEMBER 3,2017 E-1 fare,please/Favor de pager la mm7ded exacta Regional Transit Information 511 Day Pass(Regional)/Pase diario(Re Tonal) g1O Pr10 C-mpas c„�m $5.00 Informaddn de[ransportepli6lico regional (619)233-3004 One-Way Fare/Tarifa de una direction $2.25 (619)2345005 Senior(60+)/Disabled/Medicare TTY/fDD(teletype for hearing impaired) oria Mayoras de 60 anos/Discapacitados/Medicare $1.10* Teletipo para sordos (888)722 4889 Downtown San Diego— Children S& nder/Ninos de 5 an s o menos FREE/GRATIS Info Exp ress r24hour info vi.7—u Tone ph—) Informad6n las 24 horas(ma xcidr_da lades) (619)685-4900 Iris Av.Transit Center MONTHLY PASSES/Pases mensual Customer Service/Suggestions Adult/Adulto $72.00 Servicio at diente I Sugerencias (619)557-4555 Senior(60+)/Disabled/Medicare 00* SafeWatch (619)5574500 May—de 60 anos/Discapacitados/Medieare $18 Lost&Found DESTINATIONS Youths(18 and under) Ob'etos extraviados (619)557-4555 J6venes(18 arcs o menos)_.. $36.00* ) •Chula Vista High School 'ID requred for discount fare or pass Transit Store (619)234-1060 •PETCO Park --- `Se requiere Int-t5caddn para tarifaz o pages de descuento. 12th&imperial Tannt Cc. g Sweetwater High M-F dam-Spm DAY PASS(REGIONAL)/Pa.diario(Regional) For MTS online trip planning Planificad6n de via es par Internet sdmts.com All passes Id ret Ccp—C Card,which b I ailed d reused / P A$5for. tar y Carp Coeds rd. I bl f 52 at sco ebe cless - p,-Day Pas bard uses a Ca p Cant e paper Day Pass 6e Far f n g MTS pick s a Rider's purchased n box,d bwxs fon a°adoitiana 52 fzs. Gcude b ak fHe T a'St ,oa vss t sdmts com. 12th&Imped.l Too..foe pas ruse d compaes compCud a1_0 pored r P'm'a bt 'f+rnac -bne 4—da Ia cos de Gly College g do y—Toad.po hart -C p C co sten MTS q usr"Rrd Gsmde cn n tobus o e Is T ns¢ Iris Av d po bl p S2 lecras U pass d n d a 55 Ste visite..dmts tom �. bianesa bordo C"L Us per an costa ate.mal de S2. de Thank you for riding MT51 IGradas per viajar con MTSI M,v,pPlld„T,.,yesy,nm 0911] Alternative formats available upon request.Please call:(619)557.4555 1 Formato alternativo disponible a1 preguntar.Favor de Hamer:(619)557-4555 ._.._.- A aroadway -Mahe-tit Downtown area detail r, nsi 1,San Diego ar,,sr 5 -H.S. - 3 y ■@y Cellege L St City College Transit Center' �tmea oass.�1 Taal Broadwa A r 1 m g-. UC San Diego Blue Line Orange Line - - `Market St E 3Cd`Sc : o S .avr PETCO Central Library Park■ r m. -- B Imperial AV F 2a tier Gm` 's" -12th&Imperial Transit Center t 5 0�a/ 9 - -! AUC San Diego Blue Line,Orange 'Ll- "Line,Green Line,Greyhound r C!r, , 4 1es5r — P The schedules and ox4er'nformeton,ncwn'n zhu amacabl=are sub) change.MTS does not assume zspons'61 ry fer terrors n;,m xabl�s nor ivr co ary'nnvan encs Dosed by delayed buses. - G Lm haradas a nfr—.66n que sa,nd'c-en este iorror o erran suleros a E.pe9wd mnJMTS no asume msponrab,rdadpor enorx en las mnerarios,ni par a gore se engine por Iaz aarobuzas demoados A. m St H d Av Q re—f.'polnt ©GD©Owt �I �r a, rtand7or:gnat=rprint '' - uI,�A.isr Otay Nestor Chula Vista National City Downtown Downtown National City Chula Vista Otay Nestor Iris Av. Bayer Wy. 3rd Av. 3rd Av. Highland National Main St. 12th& City College Gty College 12th& Main St. 8th SL& Highland 3rd A, 3rd Av. Beyer Wy. Iris A, Transit Ctr. & & & Av.& Gty el.& & Imperial LC(11th Av.) T,=( Imperial & Nacional Av.& & & & Transit Ch. DEPARr Palm Av. Palomar St. F SL 30th St. 7th St. Vesta St Trans@ Ctr ARANE DEPART Transit CG. V=_sta St. GN 81 30th St F St Pal St P 1 A ARRIVE 5:10a 5:i7a 5:23, 5:32, 539a 5:49, 5:52a 6:04a 6:11, — — 5.17a 527, 529a 5:34a'5-43a5.4aa S:SSa 6:10 6:17 6:23 6:32 6:39 6:50 6:53 706 714 6:17 621 6:29 6:35 6:44 630 657 6:40 6:47 6:54 704 7:12 723 726 7:39 7:47 629. 6:37a 6:47 6:51 6:59 7:05 7:15 721 7:28 7:10 7:te 725 7:36 7:44 7:55 7:58 8:11 8:19 7:17 721 729 7:35 7:47 7:53 8:00 7:40 748 7:55 8:07 8:16 827 8:30 8:43 8:51 7:29 7:37 7:47 7:51 8 W 8:06 8:17 023 8:30 8:10 8:19 8:26 8:38 8:47 8:59 902 9:15 9:23 759 8:07 8:17 821 0:30 8:37 0:48 854 902 8:40 8:49 8:56 908 9:17 929 9:32 9:45 9:53 829 8:37 8:47 8:51 902 909 9:21 9:27 9:35 9:10 9:19 9:26 9:39 9:48 10:01 10..04 10:17 10:25 902 9:11 922 9:26 9:38 9:45 958 10:05 1013 9:39 9:48 9:56 1009 10:18 10:32 10:35 10:48 10:56 9:32 9:41 9:52 9S6 1008 10:15 7028 1035 10:43 9:59 10:08 10:16 1029 10:38 1052 10:55 7108 11:16 9:52 10:01 10:12 10:16 10:28 10:35 10:48 1055 11:03 10:19 10:28 1036 10:49 1058 11:72 17:15 11:28 11:36 10:12 10:21 10:32 10:36 10:48 10:55 71:08 11:15 71:23 10739 10:48 10:56 11:09 11:18 11:32 11:35 11:48 1156 1032 10:41 10:52 1056 11:08 17:75 1128 1135 11:43 7059 1108 11:16 11:29 77:38 7152 11:55 1208p 12:16p 10:52 1101 71:12 11:16 17:28 1135 11:48 71:55 12-43p 77:19 11:20 71:36 77:49 11:58 12:12p 12:15p 12:28 12:36 AND THEN EVERY 20 MINUTES AT:/YLUEGO DADA 20 MINUTOS A LA: AND THEN EVERY 20 MINUTES AM/Y LUEGO CADA 20 MINUTOS A LA: :12 :21 ;32 a7 :49 37 .11 -18 .26 :39 :48 56 :10 :20 34 :37 51 39 32 :4t :52 57 :09 :17 31 38 :26 :59 :08 :16 30 :40 54 :57 :11 :19 :52 :01 :12 :17 :29 37 :51 58 ;06 19 :28 :36 :50 90 :14 :17 31 39 UNTIL. /HASfA: UNTIL/HASTA: 4:12p 4:27p 4:32p 4:37p 4:49p 4:57p 5:17p Step 5:26 5 439p :48p :56p S:tOp 5:20p 534 5:37 5512p 4:43 4:52 502 5:07 5:19 5:27 5:40 5:47 5:55 98 55:77 5524 5:37 5:46 6:00 6:03 6:17 6:25 5:13 5:22 532 537 5:49 5:57 6:10 6:17 6:25 538 5:47 554 6:07 6:16 6:28 631 6:45 653 5:43 5:52 602 6:07 6:19 6:26 639 6:46 654 6:08 6:17 6:24 6:37 6:46 658 791 7:15 723 6:13 6:22 6:32 6:37 649 656 7:09 7;76 7:2q 6:38 646 6:53 7:06 7:14 7:25 7:28 7:42 7:50 6:38 6:47 6:57 7:02 7:13 7:19 732 7:38 7:46 7:08 7:16 7:23 735 7:43 7:54 757 8:10 8:18 7:06 7:14 7:24 7:28 7:39 7:45 757 8:03 8:11 7:40 7:48 7:54 895 8:13 8:24 827 8:39 8:47 7:36 7:44 7:54 7:58 8:08 8:14 8:25 8:31 839 8:70 8:18 8:24 H33 8:41 8:52 8:55 9:07 — 8.90 8:08 8:76 822 8:37 8:36 8:47 8:53 991 9:11 9:16 9:24 9733 9:40 9:51 9:54 10:06 — 8:30 838 8:48 852 997 9:06 9:76 922 9:29 10:11 10:18 10:24 1033 10:40 7051 10:54 11:06 — 9:00 9:08 9:17 9:21 9:30 935 9:44 9:50 9:57 11 18 11:24 11 t 0 1 17.4 72: 10:13 70:22 1026 10:35 10:40 9 1 f}ilyd Avenue Mixed Use' raffic study appendix = 3 1122 1126 1735 i:barge of A Saturday or Sunday schedule will be operated on the following holidays and observed holidays >)D New Year's Day,Presidents'Day,Memorial Day,Independence Day, Sc ope-J can horario de sabado o domingo durance los siguieates dies festivos y feriados observados tabor Day,Thanksgiving;Christmas Otay Nestor-Chula Vista-National City�Downtown Downtown-National City-Chula Vista p Otay Nestor Ids A, Beyer Wy. 3rd Av. 3rd A, Highland Nad.n.l Main St. 12th& City Collage Gty College 12th& Main St. 8th St.& Highland 3rd A, 3rd A, Beyer Wy. Iris A, Transit Ctr. & & & A,& Gty 8I.& & Impadal LG(11th AvJ T.C(ar.c,y) Imperiai & National A,& & & & Transit Ctr. DEPART Palm A, Palomar St. FSt. 30th St. 7th St. Vesta St. Transit Ctr. ARRIVE DEPART' Trans@Cu. Vasty St City el. 30th St. FSt. Palomar St. Palm Av. ARRIVE 425. 4:32. 4:38. 4:48. 4:56. 597. 511. 5:24. 5:31, 592. 5:06, S:1Sa 520, 529, 535. 542. 4:55 5 02 S;Oa 5:18 5:26 5:37 5:41 554 6:01 5:15. 5:22. 5:32 5:36 5:45 5:50 559 605 6:12 525 5:32 538 5:48 5:56 698 6:12 6:26 6:33 5:45 552 6:02 6:06 6:16 622 6:31 6:37 6:44 5:40 5:47 5.53 6:04 6:12 624 62B 6:42 6:50 5:59 6:07 617 621 6:32 6:38 6:48 654 7:01 5:55 602 698 6:19 627 639 6:43 6:57 795 6:14 622 6:32 6:36 6:47 6:54 796 7:13 721 6:10 6:17 6:23 6:34 6:42 654 6:58 7:12 7:20 6:29 6:37 6:47 6:51 7:04 7:11 7:24 731 739 6:25 6:32 6:39 6:51 6:59 7:11 7:15 7:29 7:37 6:44 652 792 796 7:19 726 7:39 7:46 7:54 6:40 6:48 6:55 797 7:16 7:28 7:32 7:46 7:54 6:58 7:07 7:18 7:22 7:35 7:42 7:55 8:02 8:10 655 7:04 7:11 7:24 7:33 7:47 7:51 895 8:13 7:13 7:22 7:33 7:37 750 7:57 8:10 8:17 8:25 7:09 7:19 727 7:41 7:51 8:05 8:09 8:23 8:31 7:2B 7:37 7:48 7:52 8:05 8:12 8:25 8:32 8:40 7:24 7:34 742 756 896 8:20 824 8:38 8:46 7:43 7:52 8:03 S. 820 8:27 8:40 8:47 B:55 7:39 749 757 011 821 8:35 839 8:53 9:01 758 8:07 818 8:22 8:35 8:42 8:55 9:02 9:10 7:54 8:04 8:12 826 8:36 8:50 B:54 998 9:16 8:13 8:22 8:33 8:37 850 8:57 9:10 9:17 925 8:09 8:19 827 0:41 851 9.95 999 9:23 9:31 828 B:37 SAS 8:52 9:05 9:12 9:75 9:32 9:40 8:25 8:34 8:42 0:56 996 920 924 9:38 946 8:43 852 9:03 9:07 9:19 926 9:40 9:47 9:55 8:40 8:49 057 917 921 9:35 9:39 953 10:01 058 9:07 9:10 9:22 9:34 9:41 9:55 10:02 1010 8:55 9:04 9:12 926 9:36 9:50 9:54 10:00 10:16 9:13 9:22 9:33 9:37 9:49 956 1010 10:17 1025 9:10 9:19 927 9:41 9:51 10:05 1099 1023 10:31 9:28 9:37 9:48 952 10:04 10:11 1025 1032 10:40 9:25 9:34 9:42 9:56 10:06 10:20 1024 10:38 10:46 9:43 9:52 10:03 10:07 70:19 10:26 10:40 10:47 1055 9:40 9:49 957 10:11 10:21 7035 10:39 1053 71:01 9:58 70:07 10:18 70:22 10:34 10:41 10:55 1192 11:70 955 1094 1012 1026 10:36 7050 10:54 11:08 71:16 10:13 10:22 70:33 10:37 10:49 1056 11:10 11:17 1125 10:10 10:19 10:27 10:41 10:51 11:05 11:09 11:23 11:31 10:28 70:37 1048 10:52 11:04 11:11 11:25 11:32 11:40 10:25 10:34 10:42 10:56 17:06 11:20 1124 11:38 11:46 10:43 7052 1193 11:07 11:19 11:26 11:40 11:47 01:55 10:40 10:49 10:57 11:11 17:21 11:35 11:39 1153 12:01p 10:58 71:07 11:18 11:23 11:35 71:42 11:56 12:04p 12:12p 1055 1194 11:12 11:26 11:36 11:50 11:54 12:08p 12:16 11:73 71:22 11:33 11:38 11:51 17:59 12:14p 12:22 1230 11:10 11:19 11:27 11:41 11:51 120Sp 12:09p 12:23 7231 1120 11:37 11:48 11:53 12:06p 12:14p 12:29 12:37 12:45 1125 11:34 11:42 11:56 12:06p 72:20 1224 12:38 12:46 11:43 71:52 12:03p 12:08p 72:21 12:29 12:44 7252 190 11:40 11:49 71:57 12:11, 12:21 7235 12:39 1253 1:01 1158 12:07, 12:18 12:23 1236 1244 12:59 1:07 7:15 1155 12:04, 12:12p 12:26 1236 1250 12:54 1:08 1:16 12:13p 12:22 1233 1238 12:51 1259 1:14 1:22 130 12:10p 12:19 12:27 12:41 12:52 1:07 1:11 1:25 133 12:24 1233 12:44 12A9 7:02 1:10 1:25 733 7:41 12:25 1234 12:42 1256 1:07122 1:26 1:40 1:48 1236 12:45 12:56 1:01 1:14 122 137 1:45 1:53 12:40 12:49 12:57 1:11 1:22 137 1:41 155 2:03 12A8 12:57 1:08 1:13 1:26 134 149 157 2:05 12:52 1:01 1:09 1:23 134 1A9 1:53 2.07 2:15 1:00 1:09 1:20 1:25 1:30 1:46 2:01 2,09 2:17 1:04 1:13 1:21 1:35 1:46 2:01 2:05 2:19 2:27 1:12 1:21 132 137 1:50 1:58 213 2:21 229 1:16 1:25 133 1:48 159 2:14 218 232 2:41 124 1:33 1A4 1:49 2:02 2:10 2:25 2:33 2:41 128 137 1A 2: 56 00 2:11 2:26 2:30 2:44 253 1:36 1:45 12:01 2:14 2:22 237 2:45 253 1:40 1:49 157 212 2:23 238 2:42 256 3:05 1:48 1:57 2:09 2:14 2:20 2:36 2:51259 3:07 1:52 201 2:09 2:24 235 2:50 254 308 3:17 2:00 2:09 2:21 227 2:41 2:50 3:05 3:13 3:21 2:04 214 2:22 2:37 2A9 3:04 3:08 3.23 3:32 2:12 2:21 2:33 2:39 2:53 3:02 3:17 3:25 333 2:16 2:26 2:34 2:49 3:01 3:16 320 335 3:44 2:24 233 245 2:51 3:05 3:14 3:29 3:37 3:45 2:28 238 2:46 3:01 3:13 3:28 332 3:47 356 236 2:45 257 393 3:17 3:26 3:41 3:49 357 2:40 230 250 3:13 3:25 3AO 3:44 359 408 2:47 257 3:09 3:16 330 3:39 355 4:03 4:11 2-52 3.02 3:10 325 3:37 352 356 4:11 4:20 2:59 3:09 3:21 3:28 3:42 351 4:07 4:15 423 3:04 3:14 3:22 337 3:49 4:04 4:08 4:23 4:32 3:11 3:21 3:33 3A0 3:54 4:03 4:19 427 4:35 3:16 326 3:34 3:49 4:01 4:16 4:20 4:35 4A4 3:23 333 3:45 3S2 4:06 4:15 4:31 4:39 4:47 3:28 338 3:46 491 4:13 4:28 4:32 4:47 4:56 3:35 3:45 3:57 492J 4 4:18 44:43 4:51 4:59 3:40 350 3:58 4:13 4:25 4A0 4:44 4:59 5:00 3:47 357 4:09 4:16 4:30 439 4:55 5:03 5:11 3:52 4:02 4:70 4:25 4:37 452 4:56 5:11 5:20 359 4:09 4:21 428 4:42 4:51 5:07 5:15 5:23 4:04 4:14 4:22 437 4:49 594 5:08 5:23 5:32 4:11 4:21 433 4:40 4:54 5:03 5:19 5:27 535 4:16 4:26 434 4:49 5:01 5:16 5:20 535 5:44 423 433 4:45 452 5:06 SAS 5:31 539 5:47 4:28 438 4:46 5:01 513 528 5:32 5:47 5:56 435 4:45 457 594 5:18 5:27 5:43 5:51 5:59 4:40 450 458 5:13 5:25 5:40 5:44 5:59 6:08 4:48 4:57 5930 9 5:16 55:38 5:54 6:01 6:09 452 5:02 5:09 5:24 536 551 555 6:09 6:18 5:00 599 521 5:28 5:42 SSo 606 6:13 6:21 5:04 5:74 5:21 5:35 5:47 6:01 6:05 6:19 6:28 5:12 5:21 5:33 5:40 554 6:02 6:18 6:25 633 5:16 5:26 533 5:46 557 6:11 6:15 6:29 6:38 5:24 533 5:45 5:52 6:06 6:14 630 6:37 6:45 5:28 5385:45 558 699 6:23 627 6:41 650 5:36 5:45 5:56 6:03 6:16 6:24 6:39 646 654 5:40 No S:'76:10 6:21 6:35 639 653 792 5:48 557 6:08 6:14 6:27 6:34 6:48 6:55 7:03 555 6:05 6:12 6:25 6:36 6:50 654 708 7:17 6:00 6:09 6:20 626 639 6:46 7:00 707 7:15 6:10 6:19 626 6:39 6:49 703 7:07 7:21 730 6:15 624 6:35 6A0 6:52 658 7:12 7:19 7:27 6:40 6A9 6:56 7:08 7:18 731 7:35 7:49 757 6:30 6:39649 654 7:06 712 7:25 732 7:40 710 7:18 7:25 737 7:47 759 8:03 8:17 8.25 6:58 7:07 717 7:21 733 739 7:52 759 896 7:40 7:48 755 8:07 8:16 828 8:31 8:45 8:53 7:29 737 747 7:51 8:02 8:08 8:19 826 833 8:10 8:18 8:25 8:37 8:45 857 900 9:13 9:20 759 8:07 817 8:21 8:31 836 8:47 854 9:01 8:40 8:48 8:54 9:04 9:12 924 9:27 9:40 9:47 829 8:37 8:47 8:51 9:01 9:06 9:17 9:24 931 9:11 9:18 9:24 9:33 9:41 9:52 9:55 10:08 10:15 839 9:07 9:17 9:21 931 9:36 9:47 954 10:01 9:41 9:48 954 10:03 10:10 70:21 10:24 10:36 70:43 930 938 9A7 9:51 10:01 10:06 10:16 10:22 1029 10:11 10:18 1024 10:33 10:40 10:51 10:54 11:06 11:13 10:00 10:08 10:17 10:21 1031 1036 10:46 70:52 1059 10:41 10:48 1054 11:03 11:10 11:21 11:24 11:36 11:43 10:30 1038 10:47 1051 1790 11:05 11:14 11:20 1127 11:41 11:48 11:54 12-03a 1210, 1221a 12:24a 12:36, 1243. 11:00 11:08 11:17 11:21 11:30 1135 11:44 1150 1157 12.41a 1248. 1254a 1:03 1:10 127 124 1:36 1:43 1130 1738 11:47 11IS 12:COa 12-05a 1214, 1220, 1227. 12,00, 12:OB. 1217. 1221. 12:30 1235 1244 1250 12- 2.53 2253 1:01 1:10 1:14 1:23 1:28 1:37 1:43 1:50 B 153 2'01 210 2:14 2'23 228 237 2:43 250 B aly ado Otay Nestor.r Chula Vista M National City Downtown Downtown National City'+Chula Vista Otay Nestor 0 0 O 0 © O © 0 O 0 © © O O 0 O O O Iris Av. Saye,Wy. 3rd A, 3rd A, Highland National Main St. 12th& Gty College City College 12th& Main St. Bth St.& Highland Ind Av. 3rd A, Beyer Wy. Iris A, Transit Ctr. & & & Av.& Gty BI.& & Imperial T.C.(11th Av.) TC.(&oadvay) Imperial & National A, & & & Transit Ctr. DEPART Palm Av. Palomar St. F SC 30th St. 7th Si. Vast.St Tar�sit Ctr. ARRIVE DEPART Transit Ctr. Vesta St. City BI. 30th St. FSC Palomar St. Palm A, ARRIVE 4:40a 4:47. 4:53. 5:02. 5:09. 5:19, 5:22a 5:34. 5:41, 5:17. 5:21. 5:29. 5:34, 5:43. 5:48. 555, 5:10 5:17 5:23 5:32 5:39 5:49 5:52 694 6:11 5:30, 5:37. 5:47 551 5:59 6:04 6:13 6:18 6:25 540 5:47 5:53 602 699 6:19 6:22 6 4 6:41 690 6:07 fi:17 621 629 6:35 6:44 6:50 657 6:10 6:17 6:23 6:32 6:39 650 653 7:06 7:14 6:29 6:37 6:47 6:51 659 795 7:15 721 728 6:40 6:47 6:54 704 712 723 7:26 7:39 7:47 6:59 707 7:17 721 7:29 7:35 7:45 751 758 710 7:18 7:25 7:36 7:44 7:55 7:58 8:11 8:19 729 7:37 7:47 7:51 8:00 8.06 8:17 823 830 7:40 7:48 7:55 8:07 8:16 8:27 8:30 8:43 8:51 759 8:07 8:17 0:21 8:30 8:37 8:48 854 9:02 0:10 8:19 8:26 8:38 8:47 8:59 902 9:15 923 829 B:37 8:47 851 9:02 9:09 9:21 9:27 935 8:40 0:49 8:56 9:08 9:17 9:29 9:32 9:45 9:53 8:53 9:01 9:11 9:15 9:26 9:33 9:45 951 959 9:00 999 9:16 9:29 9:38 9:51 9:54 10:07 10:15 9:12 9:21 9:32 9:36 9:47 9:54 10:07 10:13 10:21 9:19 9:28 9:36 9:49 950 10:12 10:15 1028 10:36 9:32 9:41 952 9:56 10:08 10:15 1028 70:35 10:43 9:39 9:40 9:56 10:09 10:18 10:32 10:35 1048 10:56 952 10:01 10:12 10:16 1028 10:35 10:48 7055 1193 9:59 10:08 10:16 10:29 10:38 10:52 10:55 11:00 11:16 10:12 1021 10:32 10:36 70:48 1055 1198 11:15 1123 10:19 1028 10:36 10:49 10:58 11:12 11:15 7128 11:36 1032 10:41 1052 7056 1108 11:15 11:28 11:35 11:43 10:39 10:48 10:56 11:09 17:18 11:32 11:35 11:48 11:56 1052 11:01 11:12 11:16 1128 1135 11:48 11:55 12:03p 10:59 1100 11:16 1129 11:38 11:52 11:55 12:08p 12:16p 11:12 11:21 11:32 11:37 11:49 11:57 12:11p 12:18p 12:26 11:19 11:28 11:36 11:49 11'x8 12:12p 12:15p 12:28 12:36 11:32 11:41 11:52 11:57 12:09, 12:17p 1231 1238 1246 11:39 11:48 1156 12:10p 12:20p 1234 1237 1251 12:59 17:52 12:01, 12:12p 12:17p 12:29 1237 12:51 1258 1:06 11:59 12:08, 12:16, 12:30 12:40 1254 1257 1:11 1:19 12:12p 1221 12:32 1237 12:49 12:57 1:11 1:18 126 12:19p 12:28 1236 12:50 1:00 1:14 1:17 131 1:39 1232 1241 1252 12:57 1:09 1:17 7:31 1:38 1:46 1239 12:48 1256 1:10 1:20 134 1:37 151 1:59 1252 1:01 1:12 1:17 729 137 751 1:50 2:06 1259 1:08 1:16 1:30 1:40 154 1:57 2:11 2:19 1:12 1:21 132 1:37 1:49 1:57 211 2:18 2:26 1:19 7:28 136 1:50 290 2:14 217 231 239 1:32 1:41 152 157 299 217 2:31 238 2:46 1:39 1:48 156 2:10 220 2:34 237 2:51 259 1:52 2:01 2:12 2:17 2:29 237 251 2:58 396 1.59 298 2:16 2:30 2AD 2:54 257 3:11 3:19 212 2:21 232 2:37 2:49 7. 3:11 3:18 326 2:19 2:28 2:36 250 3-00 3:14 3:17 331 339 2:32 2:41 2:52 2:57 3:09 3:17 331 3:38 3:46 2:39 248 2:56 3:10 3:20 334 337 3:51 359 252 391 3:12 3:17 3:29 3:37 3:51 358 4:06 2:59 398 3:16 3:30 3:40 354 3:57 4:11 4:19 3:12 3:21 3:32 337 3:49 3:57 4:11 478 4:26 3:19 328 3:36 350 4:00 4:14 4:17 431 4:39 3:32 3A1 352 357 4:09 4:17 431 4:38 4:46 3:39 3:48 356 4:10 4:20 434 437 4:51 4:59 3:52 4:01 4:12 4:17 4:29 437 4:51 458 5:06 3:59 498 4:16 430 4:40 454 4:57 5:11 5:19 4:12 4:21 4:32 4:37 4:49 457 5:11 5:18 526 4:19 4:28 436 4SO 5.90 5:14 5:17 531 5:39 4:43 452 5:02 5:07 5:19 527 540 5:47 5:55 439 4:48 4:56 5:10 5:20 534 5:37 551 5:59 5:13 5:22 532 5:37 5:49 5:57 6:10 6:17 6:25 598 5:17 5:24 5:37 5:46 6:00 6:03 6:17 625 SA3 5:52 6:02 607 6:19 6:26 6:39 6:46 6:54 538 5:47 554 6:07 6:16 6:28 631 6:45 6S3 6:13 622 632 6:37 6A9 6:56 7:09 7:16 7:24 6:08 6:17 6:24 6:37 6:46 650 791 7:15 7:23 6:38 6:47 657 7:02 7:13 719 7:32 7:38 746 638 6:46 653 7:06 7:14 7:25 7:28 7:42 750 7:06 7:14 724 7:28 739 7:45 757 8:03 B:t1 798 7:16 723 7:35 7:43 7:54 757 8:10 8:18 7:36 7:44 754 758 8:08 0:14 8:25 8:31 839 7:40 7:48 754 8:05 8:13 8:24 827 8:39 8:47 8:00 8:08 8:18 8:22 8:31 836 8A7 8:53 991 0:10 8:18 8:24 fl:33 AlB852 855 9:07 9:14 8:30 838 8:48 8:52 9:01 9:06 916 9:22 929 8:40 8:48 8:54 903 9:11 9:22 925 9.37 9A4 9:00 9:08 917 921 930 9:35 944 9:50 957 9:11 9:18 9:24 9:33 9:40 9:51 9:54 10:06 10:13 9:30 938 9:47 951 10:00 70:05 10:14 10:20 10:27 9:41 9:48 954 7093 10:10 10:21 10:24 1036 70:43 10:00 10:08 10:17 10:21 10:30 1035 70:44 7050 1057 10:41 10:48 10:54 11:03 11:10 11:21 11:24 1 i 36 11:43 1030 10:38 10:47 1051 11:00 11:05 17:14 1120 11:27 11:41 tt AS 11:54 12:03. 12:10. 12:21. 1224. 1236a 1243. 11:00 11:08 11:17 1 1:2 1 71:30 1135 17:44 11:50 11:57 1241. 1248. 12:54a 1:03 1:10 1:21 124 1:36 1:43 11:30 11:38 11:47 1151 72COa 12:05a 12:14. 12:20. 1227a 1200. 1208, 1217. 1221 a 12:30 12:35 12:44 12:50 1257 ,pJ3, 4� u Ua 4 �4a X15 � �dY Appendix 53 101 i;o z;3 223 z2S age .2 of 7120 Appendix F Count Data 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use Traffic Study Appendix Page 24 of 72 INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS PREPARED BY: PACIFIC TECHNICAL DATA DATE: LOCATION: CHULA VISTA PROJECT#: PTD17-0915-01 9/14/17 NORTH &SOUTH: THIRD LOCATION #: 1 THURSDAY EAST&WEST: E ST CONTROL: SIGNAL NOTES: '" N INCLUDE BIKE/ PED W E S NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THIRD THIRD E ST E ST NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 2 0 1 2 0 7:00 AM 9 ( 38 1 9 7 6 1 2 4 1 44 8 17 1 129 1 44 317 7:15 AM 14 51 7 6 12 11 6 68 6 22 134 35 372 7:30 AM 22 36 7 21 20 4 3 54 15 23 108 41 354 7:45 AM 15 40 14 19 28 7 8 ( 74 12 30 143 15 405 8:00 AM 16 46 14 11 12 5 5 78 13 20 129 26 375 8:15 AM 16 35 12 13 14 6 6 110 18 21 113 12 376 8:30 AM 18 29 13 14 14 6 5 78 13 28 139 22 379 z 8:45 AM 25 ( 32 13 19 17 11 4 47 21 26 126 26 367 a VOLUMES 135 307 89 110 123 52 41 553 106 187 1,021 221 2,945 APPROACH % 25% 58% 17% 39% 43% 18% 6% 79% 15% 13% 71% 15% APP/DEPART 531 / 569 285 / 416 700 / 752 1,429 / 1,208 0 BEGIN PEAK HR 7:45 AM VOLUMES 65 150 53 57 68 24 24 340 56 99 524 75 1,535 APPROACH % 24% 56% 20% 38% 46% 16% 6% 81% 13% 14% 75% 11% PEAK HR FACTOR 0.882 0.690 0.784 0.923 0.948 APP/DEPART 268 / 249 149 / 223 420 / 450 698 / 613 0 4:00 PM 21 1 39 31 27 39 1 13 11 1 145 1 45 35 92 ( 29 527 4:15 PM 21 29 30 31 40 13 9 1 142 1 35 46 115 19 530 4:30 PM 19 27 31 39 40 13 11 150 40 34 ( 108 24 536 4:45 PM 23 38 26 36 33 13 9 1 167 41 34 103 23 546 5:00 PM 21 30 31 42 38 18 9 133 37 41 124 32 556 5:15 PM 26 23 41 46 40 13 8 165 35 34 121 23 575 5:30 PM 17 1 31 36 32 49 ( 8 5 147 25 49 108 24 531 5:45 PM 30 1 32 24 25 ( 38 ( 7 11 149 31 39 101 19 506 a VOLUMES 178 249 250 278 317 98 73 1,198 289 312 872 193 4,307 APPROACH % 26% 37% 37% 40% 46% 14% 5% 77% 19% 23% 63% 14% APP/DEPART 677 / 515 693 / 918 1,560 / 1,726 1,377 / 1,148 0 BEGIN PEAK HR 4:30 PM VOLUMES 89 118 129 163 151 57 37 615 153 143 456 102 2,213 APPROACH % 26% 35% 38% 44% 41% 15% 5% 76% 19% 20% 65% 15% FA HR FACTOR 1 0.933 0.937 10.927 10.890 10.962 PP /DEPART 336 / 257 371 / 447 805 / 907 701 THIRD t f— NORTH SIDE —► I E ST WEST SIDE EAST SIDE E ST •— SOUTH SIDE—► THIRD 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use Traffic Study Appendix Page 25 of 72 THURSDAY-SEPTEMBER 14, 2017 CITY:CHULA VISTA PROJECT: PTD17-0915-01 EST-3RDT02ND AM Period NB SB EB WB PM Period NB SB EB WB 00:00 15 14 12:00 132 122 00:15 13 11 12:15 109 146 00:30 8 9 12:30 119 153 00:45 4 40 10 44 84 12:45 126 486 141 562 1048 01:00 6 7 13:00 145 133 01:15 3 13 13:15 160 143 01:30 4 6 13:30 167 156 01:45 11 24 4 30 54 13:45 156 628 181 613 1241 02:00 6 7 14:00 161 170 02:15 6 5 14:15 175 148 02:30 2 1 14:30 156 159 02:45 6 20 7 20 40 14:45 175 667 172 649 1316 03:00 5 9 15:00 198 168 03:15 2 7 15:15 201 175 03:30 4 9 15:30 174 190 03:45 6 17 17 42 59 15:45 181 754 170 703 1457 04:00 5 15 16:00 205 157 04:15 5 14 16:15 202 185 04:30 12 27 16:30 214 161 04:45 14 36 27 83 119 16:45 210 831 152 655 1486 05:00 12 40 17:00 198 190 05:15 23 38 17:15 246 176 05:30 21 50 17:30 212 184 05:45 27 83 64 192 275 17:45 186 842 155 705 1547 06:00 40 76 18:00 178 160 06:15 32 98 18:15 166 157 06:30 63 131 18:30 172 142 06:45 45 180 145 450 630 18:45 139 655 131 590 1245 07:00 55 187 19:00 137 105 07:15 88 196 19:15 131 137 07:30 81 182 19:30 121 123 07:45 100 324 197 762 1086 19:45 129 518 96 461 979 08:00 99 181 20:00 94 88 08:15 120 167 20:15 76 65 08:30 103 175 20:30 91 77 08:45 72 394 192 715 1109 20:45 74 335 71 301 636 09:00 89 199 21:00 77 69 09:15 86 153 21:15 58 62 09:30 112 152 21:30 59 54 09:45 92 379 120 624 1003 21:45 46 240 50 235 475 10:00 98 138 22:00 35 45 10:15 83 148 22:15 28 36 10:30 109 148 22:30 47 25 10:45 113 403 151 585 988 22:45 25 135 32 138 273 11:00 119 146 23:00 26 25 11:15 111 111 23:15 29 17 11:30 126 134 23:30 23 18 11:45 144 500 139 530 1030 23:45 15 93 24 84 177 Total Vol. 2400 4077 6477 6184 5696 11880 Daily Totals NB SB EB WB Combined AM 8584 9773 18357 PM Split% 37.1% 62.9% 35.3% 52.1% 47.9% 64.7% Peak Hour 11:15 07:00 07:45 16:30 14:45 16;45 Volume 513 762 1142 868 705 1568 P.H.F. 0.89 0.97 0.96 0.88 0.93 0.93 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use Traffic Study A��qR ix CHNICAL DATA Page 26 of 72 Appendix G Existing intersection LOS,E St Counts,and OMOC LOS 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use Traffic Study Appendix Page 27 of 72 AM Existing 1: Third Avenue & E Street HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Movement . EBL EBT. `-EBR ;1 IBL :WBT; "INBR NBL NST-- '` IB Lane Configurations + ,� Volume(veh/h) 24 340 56 99 524 75 65 150 53 57 68 24 Number 1 6 16 5 2 12 7 4 14 3 8 18 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.96 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 ' 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 25 358 59 104 552 79 68 158 56 60 72 25 Adj No.of Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 - 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 38 1256 205 134 1453 207 88 587 199 77 415 340 Arrive On Green 0.02 0.41 0.41 0.08 0.47 0.47 0.05 0.23 0.23 0.04 0.22 0.22 Sat Flow,veh/h 1774 3029 494 1774 3098 442 1774 2565 868 1774 1863 1527 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 25 207 210 104 314 317 68 107 107 60 72 25 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1774 1770 1753 1774 1770 1770 1774 1770 1663 1774 1863 - 1527 Q Serve(g_s),s 1.1 6.2 6.3 4.6 9.1 9.2 3.0 3.9 4.2 2.6 2.5 1.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 1.1 6.2 6.3 4.6 9.1 9.2 3.0 3.9 4.2 2.6 2.5 1.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.28 1.00 0.25 1.00 0.52 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 38 734 727 134 830 830 88 405 380 77 415 340 V/C Ratio(X) 0.66 0.28 0.29 0.77 0.38 0.38 0.78 0.26 0.28 0.78 0.17 0.07 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 146 734 727 303 830 830 235 405 380 213 415 340 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 38.4 15.4 15.4 35.9 13.6 13.6 37.2 25.0 25.2 37.5 24.9 24.3 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 17.8 1.0 1.0 9.1 1.3 1.3 13.5 1.6 1.8 15.5 0.9 0.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 0.7 3.2 3.2 2.6 4.7 4.8 1.8 2.1 2.1 1.6 1.4 0.5 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 56.2 16.3 16.4 45.0 14.9 14.9 50.6 26.6 27.0 53.0 25.8 24.7 LnGrp LOS E B B D B B D C C D C C Approach Vol,veh/h 442 735 282 157 Approach Delay,s/veh 18.6 19.2 32.6 36.0 Approach LOS B B C D Timer Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 6.2 42.0 7.9 23.0 10.5 37.7 8.4 22.5 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.5 4.9 4.5 4.9 4.5 4.9 4.5 4.9 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 6.5 37.1 9.5 18.1 13.5 30.1 10.5 17.1 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+ll),s 3.1 11.2 4.6 6.2 6.6 8.3 5.0 4.5 Green Ext Time(p-c),s 0.0 6.3 0.0 1.2 0.1 6.0 0.0 1.2 Intersection Sumrriary, . � . HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 23.0 HCM 2010 LOS C LOS Engineering,Inc. 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use Traffic Study Appendix Page 28 of 72 PM Existing 1 : Third Avenue & E Street HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Palo `rrtent EBL ` EBT EBR . BL� a:WBT e •e �VWBR. >NBL NBT' '�;'NBCR",, �SB ` Lane Configurations ' t'- tT.-. tT+ Volume(veh/h) 37 615 153 143 456 102 89 118 129 163 151 57 Number 1 6 16 5 2 12 7 4 14 3 8 18 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.94 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 39 641 159 149 475 106 93 123 134 170 157 59 Adj No.of Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 51 988 245 185 1233 273 120 344 289 208 455 363 Arrive On Green 0.03 0.36 0.36 0.10 0.43 0.43 0.07 0.19 0.19 0.12 0.24 0.24 Sat Flow,veh/h 1774 2778 688 1774 2859 633 1774 1770 1489 1774 1863 1487 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 39 408 392 149 293 288 93 123 134 170 157 59 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlh/In 1774 1770 1696 1774 1770 1722 1774 1770 1489 1774 1863 1487 Q Serve(g_s),s 1.8 15.9 15.9 6.8 9.3 9.4 4.2 5.0 6.6 7.7 5.7 2.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 1.8 15.9 15.9 6.8 9.3 9.4 4.2 5.0 6.6 7.7 5.7 2.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.41 1.00 0.37 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 51 630 604 185 763 743 120 344 289 208 455 363 V/C Ratio(X) 0.77 0.65 0.65 0,81 0.38 0.39 0.78 0.36 0.46 0.82 0.35 0.16 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 134 630 604 269 763 743 222 344 289 291 455 363 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 -1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 39.7 22.2 22.2 36.0 15.9 16.0 37.8 28.7 29.3 35.5 25.7 24.5 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 20.9 5.1 5.3 10.7 1.5 1.5 10.3 2.9 5.2 11.8 2.1 1.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 1.2 8.6 8.3 3.9 4.8 4.8 2.4 2.7 3.1 4.5 3.2 1.1 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 60.6 27.3 27.6 46.8 17.4 17.5 48.0 31.6 34.6 47.3 27.8 25.4 LnGrp LOS E C C D B B D C C D C C Approach Vol,veh/h 839 730 350 386 Approach Delay,s/veh 29.0 23.4 37.1 36.0 Approach LOS C C D D Timer:; 1 2 `3 4 5 6 7, '' 8 Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 6.9 40.4 14.1 20.9 13.1 34.2 10.1 25.0 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.5 4.9 4.5 4.9 4.5 4.9 4.5 4.9 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 6.2 35.5 13.5 16.0 12.5 29.2 10.3 19.2 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+ll),s 3.8 11.4 9.7 8.6 8.8 17.9 6.2 7.7 Green Ext Time(p-c),s 0.0 8.8 0.1 1.5 0.1 5.9 0.1 1.9 Intersection Summary;, HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 29.6 HCM 2010 LOS C LOS Engineering,Inc. 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use Traffic Study Appendix Page 29 of 72 AM Existing With Urban Core Specific Plan Improvement 1: Third Avenue & E Street HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary aa-- # MovementEBL EBT ' SBR '�,WBL. vv T;',. WBR' NBL `, 'NIBT NBR.' S1 L� --; SBT,',;.':SBR Lane Configurations ' 0 '� tT,+ t r +� t Volume(veh/h) 24 340 56 99 524 75 65 150 53 57 68 24 Number 1 6 16 5 2 12 7 4 14 3 8 18 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.96 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate,vehlh 25358 59 104 552 79' 68 158 56 60 72 25 Adj No.of Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h` 38 1256 205 134 1449 207 88 426 ' 346 77 415 340 Arrive On Green 0.02 0.41 0.41 0.08 0.47 0.47 0.05 0.23 0.23 0.04 0.22 0.22 Sat Flow,veh/h 1774 3029 494 1774 3089 440 1774 1863 1514 1774 1863 1527 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 25 207 210 104 315 316 68 158 56 60 72 25 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1774 1770 1753 1774 1770 1760 1774 1863 1514 1774 1863 1527 Q Serve(g_s),s 1.1 6.2 6.3 4.6 9.1 9.2 3.0 5.7 2.3 2.6 2.5 1.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 1.1 6.2 6.3 4.6 9.1 9.2 3.0 5.7 2.3 2.6 2.5 1.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.28 1.00 0.25 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 38 734 727 134 830 825 88 426 346 77 415 340 V/C Ratio(X) 0.66 0.28 0.29 0.77 0.38 0.38 0.78 0.37 0.16 0.78 0.17 0.07 Avail Cap(c_a),vehlh 146 734 727 303 830 825 235 426 346' 213 415 340 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(]) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 38.4 15.4 15.4 35.9 13.6 13.6 37.2 25.7 24.4 37.5 24.9 24.3 Ince Delay(d2),s/veh 17.8 1.0 1.0 9.1 1.3 1.3 13.5 2.5 1.0 15.5 0.9 0.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 0.7 3.2 3.2 2.6 4.8 4.8 1.8 3.2 1.1 1.6 1.4 0.5 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 56.2 16.3 16.4 45.0 14.9 14.9 50.6 28.2 25.4 53.0 25.8 24.7 LnGrp LOS E B B D B B D C C D C C Approach Vol,veh/h 442 735 282 157 Approach Delay,s/veh 18.6 19.2 33.1 36.0 Approach LOS B B C D timer;,,:, .:": „: ' :` 1 Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 6.2 42.0 7.9 23.0 10.5 37.7 8.4 22.5 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.5 4.9 4.5 4.9 4.5 4.9 4.5 4.9 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 6.5 37.1 9.5 18.1 13.5 30.1 10.5 17.1 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+11),s 3.1 11.2 4.6 7.7 6.6 8.3 5.0 4.5 Green Ext Time(p-c),s 0.0 6.3 0.0 1.0 0.1 6.0 0.0 1.1 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 23.1 HCM 2010 LOS C LOS Engineering,Inc. 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use Traffic Study Appendix Page 30 of 72 PM Existing With Urban Core Specific Plan Improvement 1: Third Avenue & E Street HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Movement - - EBL EBT..; - EBR. 'VtBL;.::1NBT WBR NIB "..NBT ' NBR 'SBL SBT : BR Lane Configurations to '� '� t r '� t r Volume(veh/h) 37 615 153 143 456 102 89 118 129 163 151 57 Number 1 6 16 5 2 12 7 4 14 3 8 18 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.94 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 39 641 159 149 475 106 93 123 134 170 157 59 Adj No.of Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 51 988 245 185 1227 271 120 362 289 208 455 363 Arrive On Green 0.03 0.36 0.36 0.10 0.43 0.43 0.07 0.19 0.19 0.12 0.24 0.24 Sat Flow,veh/h 1774 2778 688 1774 2844 629 1774 1863 1489 1774 1863 1487 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 39 408 392 149 294 287 93 123 134 170 157 59 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1774 1770 1696 1774 1770 1703 1774 1863 1489 1774 1863 1487 Q Serve(g_s),s 1.8 15.9 15.9 6.8 9.3 9.5 4.2 4.7 6.6 7.7 5.7 2.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 1.8 15.9 15.9 6.8 9.3 9.5 4.2 4.7 6.6 7.7 5.7 2.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.41 1.00 0.37 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 51 630 604 185 763 735 120 362 289 208 455 363 V/C Ratio(X) 0.77 0.65 0.65 0.81 0.39 0.39 0.78 0.34 0.46 0.82 0.35 0.16 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 134 630 604 269 763 735 222 362 289 291 455 363 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 39.7 22.2 22.2 36.0 16.0 16.0 37.8 28.6 29.3 35.5 25.7 24.5 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 20.9 5.1 5.3 10.7 1.5 1.6 10.3 2.5 5.2 11.8 2.1 1.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 1.2 8.6 8.3 3.9 4.9 4.8 2.4 2.7 3.1 4.5 3.2 1.1 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 60.6 27.3 27.6 46.8 17.4 17.6 48.0 31.1 34.6 47.3 27.8 25.4 LnGrp LOS E C C D B B D C C D C C Approach Vol,veh/h 839 730 350 386 Approach Delay,s/veh 29.0 23.5 36.9 36.0 Approach LOS C C D D Timer „` 1 '2 3 :4 5 6 7 8 Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 6.9 40.4 14.1 20.9 13.1 34.2 10.1 25.0 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.5 4.9 4.5 4.9 4.5 4.9 4.5 4.9 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 6.2 35.5 13.5 16.0 12.5 29.2 10.3 19.2 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+ll),s 3.8 11.5 9.7 8.6 8.8 17.9 6.2 7.7 Green Ext Time(p-c),s 0.0 8.8 0.1 1.3 0.1 5.9 0.1 1.6 Intersection S'6m' ary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 29.6 HCM 2010 LOS C LOS Engineering,Inc. 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use Traffic Study Appendix Page 31 of 72 THURSDAY-SEPTEMBER 14, 2017 CITY: CHULA VISTA PROJECT: PTD17-0915-01 E ST- BROADWAY TO 5 TH AM Period NB SB EB WB PM Period NB SB EB Wg 00:00 20 9 12:00 108 119 00:15 12 9 12:15 121 113 00:30 18 7 12:30 119 131 00:45 8 58 4 29 87 12:45 117 465 113 476 941 01:00 5 6 13:00 121 112 01:15 15 8 13:15 118 106 01:30 3 4 13:30 134 139 01:45 11 34 4 22 56 13:45 154 527 138 495 1022 02:00 11 13 14:00 143 121 02:15 3 2 14:15 134 98 02:30 9 1 14:30 155 118 02:45 4 27 7 23 50 14:45 171 603 141 478 1081 03:00 12 6 15:00 175 131 03:15 2 8 15:15 192 133 03:30 4 9 15:30 176 137 03:45 4 22 13 36 58 15:45 177 720 124 525 1245 04:00 3 21 16:00 157 112 04:15 8 21 16:15 166 124 04:30 10 25 16:30 161 102 04:45 6 27 32 99 126 16:45 145 629 130 468 1097 05:00 14 49 17:00 177 127 05:15 20 49 17:15 175 131 05:30 14 49 17:30 169 119 05:45 21 69 70 217 286 17:45 166 687 108 485 1172 06:00 34 77 18:00 150 104 06:15 27 95 18:15 147 104 06:30 51 111 18:30 148 111 06:45 49 161 109 392 553 18:45 133 578 86 405 983 07:00 73 135 19:00 104 66 07:15 75 139 19:15 93 81 07:30 92 119 19:30 107 119 07:45 102 342 121 514 856 19:45 100 404 91 357 761 08:00 143 127 20:00 93 55 08:15 142 100 20:15 77 70 08:30 132 110 20:30 78 79 08:45 96 513 113 450 963 20:45 58 306 84 288 594 09:00 84 86 21:00 69 60 09:15 83 104 21:15 71 61 09:30 88 115 21:30 39 55 09:45 88 343 117 422 765 21:45 42 221 51 227 448 10:00 71 9822:00 47 34 10:15 102 103 22:15 53 35 10:30 97 105 22:30 37 33 10:45 103 373 129 435 808 22:45 40 177 31 133 310 11:00 99 107 23:00 33 23 11:15 105 114 23:15 32 32 11:30 105 122 23:30 23 23 11:45 123 432 121 464 896 23:45 19 107 25 103 210 Total Vol. 2401 3103 5504 5424 4440 9864 Daily Totals NB SB EB WB Combined AM 7825 7543 15368 Split 0/043.6% 56.4% 35.8% 55.0% 45.0% 64.2% Peak Hour 07:45 07:00 07:45 15:00 14:45 14:45 Volume 519 514 977 P.H.F. 720 542 1256 0.91 0.92 0.90 0.94 0.96 0.97 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use Traffic Study A��(grT&iVCHNICAL DATA Page 32 of 72 THURSDAY-SEPTEMBER 14, 2017 CITY: CHULA VISTA PROJECT: PTD17-0915-01 E ST- 1 ST TO BONITA AM Period NB SB EB WB PM Period NB SB EB WB 00:00 16 12 12:00 143 131 00:15 13 13 12:15 145 141 00:30 13 10 12:30 159 155 00:45 12 54 9 44 98 12:45 148 595 168 595 1190 01:00 12 12 13:00 131 158 01:15 11 11 13:15 155 141 01:30 6 10 13:30 169 166 01:45 4 33 8 41 74 13:45 184 639 184 649 1288 02:00 5 5 14:00 156 189 02:15 9 4 14:15 171 165 02:30 6 6 14:30 173 151 02:45 8 28 6 21 49 14:45 193 693 168 673 1366 03:00 7 4 15:00 153 177 03:15 5 4 15:15 178 184 03:30 8 5 15:30 179 191 03:45 10 30 6 19 49 15:45 190 700 151 703 1403 04:00 10 9 16:00 161 168 04:15 10 12 16:15 173 184 04:30 12 21 16:30 169 188 04:45 20 52 22 64 116 16:45 158 661 162 702 1363 05:00 21 30 17:00 196 184 05:15 19 39 17:15 164 191 05:30 28 41 17:30 169 177 05:45 52 120 66 176 296 17:45 150 679 151 703 1382 06:00 56 78 18:00 144 177 06:15 91 91 18:15 171 178 06:30 137 111 18:30 143 135 06:45 158 442 121 401 843 18:45 160 618 125 615 1233 07:00 191 168 19:00 127 126 07:15 202 177 19:15 149 131 07:30 212 189 19:30 138 141 _ 07:45 222 827 168 702 1529 19:45 112 526 111 509 1035 08:00 157 191 20:00 100 90 08:15 195 165 20:15 84 80 08:30 177 188 20:30 77 65 08:45 205 734 199 743 1477 20:45 78 339 77 312 651 09:00 180 221 21:00 84 84 09:15 162 168 21:15 87 66 09:30 149 168 21:30 67 51 09:45 136 627 131 688 1315 21:45 43 281 40 241 522 10:00 136 128 22:00 49 35 10:15 135 144 22:15 51 44 10:30 142 151 22:30 43 41 10:45 143 556 168 591 1147 22:45 42 185 28 148 333 11:00 136 151 23:00 32 21 11:15 117 135 23:15 22 20 11:30 123 128 23:30 24 19 11:45 145 521 141 555 1076 23:45 33 111 20 80 191 Total Vol. 4024 4045 8069 6027 5930 11957 Daily Totals NB SB EB WB Combined 10051 9975 20026 AM PM Split% 49.9% 50.1% 40.3% 50.4% 49.6% 59.70/b Peak Hour 07:00 08:30 08:15 15:15 16:30 14:45 Volume 827 776 1530 708 725 1423 P.H.F. 0.93 0.88 0.95 0.93 0.95 0.96 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use Traffic Study A��@W ix CHNICAL DATA Page 33 of 72 N N ON a N N N N IL C) M co c`i M M M uO rn N o N N w o a o 0 0 0 Cl) rn N N N N N N co M N N N N JN L�c� r rCU N ON ON ,. N O CN O N O o i 00 ON N ON NO ON N N O N i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cl) N NO CN ON O O O N Cl)Nm i m M (D' Q) O h p o 6> O O O o N .- N ON O O O O p m N N N N N N 00 O O n p co ap N O ap O O rn p ' c) C) O a N N N N N N N N i N N O � p p o p ' o ' v Cl) N N N N N N M N CO N 10 CD OT O O O Ul O w O , O p V N N N N O O wy p CN N N mh " N 0 i Fes- H Fes- ofF- T o ° ai 3 ... >, > N >' N N O > acicA REQ > ¢ Q in Y > m 3m ° > mQ ti o d m > a ° � 2 � Q c ¢ic c = 00 3 Q > > W � m m = r - o m o o Q c c Q o CL) o m o o n °o o o ` 'c d aw Ll- U- cn LL w z din spm` LL U- -U) m° ami I sZ CL Q m 3 (!) 0 0 caa 0 E Ea E❑ E E LL LL N L - T m o x O U LL TC "S fT9 N Q > N ❑ O Y C T j > a) o� a 3oQtQ °c m d 0 co 3 > < > < cn m oaQ c 0 0 ° o t o s o m n o ° m 72 n ° o o m N c�a � mLLLLf m w = a m _ LLLL - cnU- x a� a �� m a a m o a � E ❑ E c _ ¢ E E E E N E s � E > zo o o N N m -p M m m e C6 Q N cu N '�O z z co z m z Z (a f0 Z 'X Cn U U (C cn O � T N Q' i N v vv O) in in inu� v) m � � > in in in in in in in in in 80 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑'❑ r) ❑ p 810 WwWiWW WWWW N 11 �- N N M Ct �A ui N M d' C° h N p Izl Z fum) 00 U) U) U) rIx ~n't~n Q fes- Z Z ¢ I= F- H1- F- 1- 1- F- F ❑ U U ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ p Cn = Uj rn Cl) rn v� rn to to rn rn ❑ ❑ wwwwwwwWlw U1 00 00 G1 G\ «� co oo 00 oa oo h h 00 00 co 00 c c, 00 00 00 00 Q' O o0 0 0 00' 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 LO A � Cr �o 00 N 00 00 CV O �o 00 00 H 00 O O 00 r- It D �o 00 p�„ O VU mU Uml mU V V Uv mm UU UU VU UU -FFF H A G .'; r. .. .. 00 N o0 0o C G� o0 00.. a7 co O O h r o0 0o h [� O O o0 00 00 00 r- O o0 00 00' oo - - -- oo � � 00 00 C -J d N w CT ni M [•' �J a0 h N V'1 M [� C1 CO 00 1p 4; ' I ^_ OW U U m1 q f 0� i U U U U fb m I U a V U W q u U j L^ co N O I D U I v ' I ` O C 0000 � CN (01, C, CIN C, C� �' F C7 � Q O o0 00 00 00 � � o0 00 00 00 - � I I I I i I I I I I I I I l of v G1 M h V7 V) Ln 00 C% oo O O O oo O L� � � � `\ O mm mm moa' qm qq dd ¢ d Uoa Uml mq Ulm Q w r' L/ q m n m m CO m q m q m m m m m m m q m A m D z v� 7 z vi' z zn z w 3 w 3 w 3 w 3 w w 3 > Q c Q 0C/) 0 0 0 2ul _ L QU mU xU QU 7- U > U 3 Gzl > Z QZ cc �' > N r Nc^a z OW w vs ors (.2 Ems— ` GL co Appendix H On Site Parking Details 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use Traffic Study Appendix Page 36 of 72 � N O N O N Cb M N � � d fn N v N u'i O u] O<m M N M"l IR V N N D 0 > W W O W Z Q N � y wx y N Mui m CL z O cli W u W ¢ C N O W W ¢ w cc ME a ¢ww¢ ¢ wwJwz¢ 2 p D rW-o� C7 pw w¢ pwww o u~i�a rwi�r~-n V5u?a �d JAL v�O Om OJ U¢m0 R O�>OF- bin W �//�� 5J�00 Y �W 00o yZZLLQ y/ W OK= QJ�n=U VJ2j O O O¢ddCC O 6. d m n- 1- w y rLZ W o�c c z W ww Ww w LLw f% o in O Y�J Z 4 O Q Z f0 N CL ® m x zx o m J LMW LJJ J m mui ® Z Q N M C W CC � T Z � 5 ® o m ? CD a 4 yv�in in in in TT Z p p ZvCL L W Z - � N CL J ¢ 0. Z3 w N tb j w m 2 (7 mm In O 2 m 2 = m m F p(5 LTJ U j x T Z ; w Z LU ,. �. d o .;n LU C ' e cn 7R v APpendiH I City Off Site Parking Locations 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use Traffic Study Appendix Page 38 of 72 o p Cl) c*i Cl) o Q) o 9 0 o H °o ¢' o N °7 3 o Y a o O N tt:p 3 3 > — N o70 U m 0 o w G p O 0 O O O m O O O 3 O J O y o t o NC) c C_- = p Q) _0 Q D 3 `o a 0 o > H n 00 O � C) 0- Q � > E a 3 o L Q N N U O h IL ? =O o w L E G o, c F— 0 C14> v Q I( � > > > > > aci o 'O 0 > L H O '^ ¢ Q Q Q Q Q o a '� N D Q1 C)i a v Q U = rte— E E mOl 10 CD N "-" � U U N N ch N N N (N N _ O p o ON N ch o N o 6 o .. d ^� 0 0 3 0 O G c N N O'0 O O L N T N c U o c a o s L m � c m C U N N L N O a N -p0 N Q3j -1— N O j p O C Q _ > L N -0 C Q 3 m � Y O N p p U U co v N N O `0 L II <> o II II II II II II O O o c"c-' c O O 0 O O O 0 0 0 G u c ° 3 GO .• • 011, s v >. S„' .�� I � •• .,. � ,_. r", �� r�iC'a�i--y r %$off �/1 u,°X S��Y1i,� Idil � I M' tl I 1.;�� F • �.,M,� :,t`�. .;"mo"""w ^r', r ... y w n , o a o —� xh u I�, I o ..r .S /�"^ c m -p� -o 0 6 25 a a��. c ; -0 ° a N o U �, o W V T E CL > o o h Q 0 Z N Q U > a 00 co coo a = O U b N a) � � E N ° E 200 i X Q U C) a a s ° o 0 0 �o U C15 F- -o a -0 E o a 3 m N �' a �, a) o m ° o a � N c C O ° _O O O O m . U °°' E °E o O a H > E TN _oc > O p .� D o C Q O o C _ U ° '� co c c = c o E m o U °Ln C0 H _ t ch N U O IIa CD N 0¢ ° E � oC U x U -2!- U NNO UO ° Ua5 i ° ° U o v y Q N a s L) v O N V C O o r" 6 O d a o o o N CL � Q � N ° ' O) (� o 'c c ° i > Q a Qp d Mc iQ—a ? W . _Cmmy aS) E H Jeft a O ° — S O C '4O N N t o Cl) U ° o° E E E o N E > °� .= o E o E OU O o E Q> co 2 2 LD 0 6 Uo � 0C ° C x 0 pO O O OD U C > C N D } x 0 a) O a 0 U U U o 2 ° aj C _ O O E D Q O Q O in ii ° O N N N p > _ U v a o Q Q Q ° m G Q N Q 3 o c U > o _ APAS N - P Q ° Q1 � °' _N v ° c °' E Q ° ° a 2i `')Cl) O Q � 47 Q O . a T O 'a v O 0 0 U C5 U = > N 0 ° C o h o �? m O 7C) C — /'1O0o •> Appendix J Chen Ryan Associates'Parking Study June 1,2011&DCSP VI-13 Details 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use Traffic Study Appendix Page 41 of 72 MEMORANDUM TO: Ian M. Gill, Silvergate Development FROM: Stephen Cook, PE, Chen Ryan Associates Jonathan Sanchez, Chen Ryan Associates DATE: June 1, 2017 RE:Third Avenue Parking Study—Chula Vista, CA The purpose of this technical memorandum is to identify if there is sufficient public parking within the Downtown Parking District,which is located in the Third Avenue Village neighborhood of the City of Chula Vista, to accommodate the off-site parking needs of two proposed multi-family projects, located at 201 Third Avenue,and 230 Church Avenue. Project Description Both of the proposed projects are part of the Chula Vista Urban Core Specific Plan which encourages the development of new higher-density infill residential and commercial projects in and around the Third Avenue Village in the City of Chula Vista. The proposed land uses and number of on-site parking spaces proposed for each project are outlined below: • 201 Third Avenue-Proposes to develop 21 multi-family dwelling units with 2,485 square feet of commercial area, and will provide 20 on-site parking spaces. The project will be developed on an approximately 11,300 square-foot empty lot. ® 230 Church Avenue-Proposes to develop 29 multi-family units and will provide 24 on-site parking spaces. The project will be on an existing public surface parking lot, currently providing 29 parking spaces. Due to the constrained size of both proposed project sites, both projects will utilize provisions of the Urban Core Specific Plan (UCSP) to meet City parking code. This UCSP program allows projects within Chula Vista's Downtown core to utilizethe excess public parking capacity within the area to accommodate a portion of their project's demand off-site, up to a maximum of 50%. Figure 1 displays the location of the proposed projects, as well as the existing public parking lots within the Third Avenue Village area. 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use Traffic Study Appendix Page 42 of 72 CD CD C �CD E s�tee� Da`��ds��S�Ceet 201 Third Avenue: 29 Parking Spaces 230 Church Avenue Lot 1:14 Parking Spaces � Lot 2:71 Parking Spaces G Lot 3: 115 Parking Spaces co 1 Lot 10:29 Parking Spaces � StCee�' Third Avenue Village Perking Stttdy Figure 1 CHENz° Project Study Area kAd Pvenue Mixed Use Traffic Study Appendix Page 43 of 72 Parking Requirements The City's Urban Core Specific Plan requires both proposed projects to provide one and a half(1.5) parking spaces per residential multi-family dwelling unit and one (1) guest parking space per ten (10) residential dwelling units, The Urban Core Specific Plan also requires the 201 Third Avenue project to provide two (2) parking spaces per 1,000 SF of commercial space. Table 1 displays the parking requirements for both proposed projects. Table 1 Proposed Project Parking Requirements so / Residential Multi-family 21 dwelling units 1.5 spaces dwelling unit 32 201 Third Avenue 1 guest space/10 dwelling units 2 Commercial 2,485 square-feet 2 spaces/1,000 square-feet 5 Sub-Total 39 230 Church Avenue Residential Multi-family 29 dwelling units 1.5 spaces/dwelling unit 44 1 guest space/10 dwelling units 3 Total for Both Projects 86 Source:City of Chula Vista-Urban Core Specific Plan As shown,the projects would be required to provide a combined total of 86 parking spaces (39 spaces for 201 Third Avenue and 47 for 230 Church Street),based on their respective proposed land uses. Third Avenue Village Existing Parking Demand/Supply To determine if there is currently enough public parking supply within the Third Avenue Village area to accommodate the excess parking demand of both projects, a series of parking occupancy counts were performed at the existing 230 Church Avenue parking lot (Lot B), as well as at the other nearby public parking lots (within 500 feet) from each of the respective proposed project sites, as shown in Figure 1. Counts were preformed between March 21, 2017 and March 26, 2017 with the time period including three weekdays and two weekend days.Technicians visited each lot hourly and documented the number of spaces occupied between 7:00 AM and 9:OOPM. Thus, the average demand specified in Table 2 represents the average number of spaces being occupied for each parking lot with data collected from counts conducted over the three weekdays and two weekend days. Table 2 displays the current parking supply for each observed public parking lot, as well as the average parking demand and availability during three weekdays and two weekend days. It should be noted that the results of the parking occupancy counts were compared to historical parking lot usage rates based on the fees collected. The data could only be compared during the hours in which fees are charged within the lots, 8:00 AM to 6:00 PM. Based on this comparison it was found that the observed parking usage within these lots was within 2% of the historic average (average historic usage 52% vs observed usage 50%). Therefore, it can be assumed that the observed counts are within the historic norm. 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use Traffic Study Appendix Page 44 of 72 Table 2—Existing Parkin9 Occu anc —Public Parking Lots Average Average Average Average Demand Availability Demand `-Availability B 29 4 25 2 27 1 14 4 10 4 10 7:00 AM 2 71 6 65 6 65 3 115 10 105 9 106 10 29 5 24 4 25 B 29 7 22 2 27 1 14 5 9 4 10 8:00 AM 2 71 8 63 6 65 3 115 22 93 9 106 10 29 7 22 6 23 B 29 11 18 5 24 1 14 6 8 5 9 9:00 AM 2 71 18 53 10 61 3 115 57 58 14 101 10 29 12 17 8 21 B 29 17 12 8 21 1 14 8 6 6 8 10:00 AM 2 71 22 49 13 58 3 115 82 33 31 84 10 29 20 9 14 15 B 29 20 9 11 18 1 14 7 7 8 6 11:00 AM 2 71 28 43 17 54 3 115 85 30 27 88 10 29 23 6 17 12 B 29 20 9 8 21 1 14 7 7 8 6 12:00 PM 2 71 30 41 20 51 3 115 76 39 27 88 10 29 23 6 18 11 B 29 20 9 7 22 1 14 9 5 5 9 1:00 PM 2 71 27 44 20 51 3 115 61 54 28 87 10 29 24 5 19 10 B 29 19 10 5 24 1 14 8 6 5 9 2:00 PM 2 71 26 45 19 52 3 1 115 70 45 28 87 10 1 29 22 7 18 11 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use Traffic Study Appendix Page 45 of 72 Table 2,—Existin Parkin Occu anc —Public Parking Lots MppllfAverage Average Average Average • Demand Avaiiability Demand Availability B 29 18 11 5 24 1 14 10 4 6 8 3:00 PM 2 71 24 47 15 56 3 115 75 40 24 91 10 29 24 5 17 12 B 29 16 13 4 25 1 14 10 4 4 10 4:00 PM 2 71 24 47 16 55 3 115 64 51 27 88 10 29 24 5 17 12 B 29 13 16 3 26 1 14 11 3 3 11 5:00 PM 2 71 23 48 18 53 3 115 42 73 23 92 10 29 24 5 15 14 B 29 9 20 -3 - 26 1 14 9 5 3 11 6:00 PM 2 71 26 45 19 52 3 115 27 88 26 89 10 29 18 11 18 11 B 29 8 21 3 26 1 14 9 5 4 10 7:00 PM 2 71 35 36 22 49 3 115 23 92 21 94 10 29 15 14 19 10 B 29 4 25 2 27 1 14 8 6 5 9 8:00 PM 2 71 33 38 32 39 3 115 19 96 22 93 10 29 14 15 18 11 B 29 3 26 0 29 1 14010 8 3 11 9:00 PM 2 71 53 21 50 3 115 99 19 96 10 29 19 15 14 Source:Chen Ryan Associates, March 2017, 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use Traffic Study Appendix Page 46 of 72 Hourly Parking Requirements The parking demand for a specific development can fluctuate during the different hours of the day, based on the land uses contained within that development. To understand the hourly parking demand for each of the proposed projects, daily parking distribution rates contained in the Urban Land Institute Shared Parking Manual (Second Edition, 2005) were utilized to determine both their weekday and weekend hourly parking demands. To determine if there is sufficient public parking within the Third Avenue Village area to accommodate both of the proposed projects, the hourly parking demands for each proposed project was compared to the available on-site parking, as well as the available off-site public parking available within 500 feet of the project site (documented in Table 2). 201 Third Avenue Project Based on the location of the 201 Third Avenue project,the closest parking lots are Lot 1 and Lot 2 (as seen in Figure 1). It is assumed that project patrons and residents would first utilize the excess parking capacity in Lot 1 due to the shorter walking distance to the proposed project, with the remaining excess demand utilizing Lot 2. Tables 3 and 4 display the projected parking conditions for the 201 Third Avenue project during weekdays and weekends, respectively. Table 3-201 Third Avenue Project Demand on Weekdays • Off-site Demdnd Lot 2 Availability in Lot 2 "TOO 30 20 10 10 0 65 65 8:00 AM 30 20 10 9 1 63 62 9:00 AM 31 20 11 8 3 53 50 10:00 AM 29 20 9 6 3 49 46 11:00 AM 28 20 8 7 1 43 42 12:00 PM 27 20 7 7 0 41 41 1:00 PM 28 20 8 5 3 44 41 2:00 PM 28 20 8 6 2 45 43 3:00 PM 28 20 8 4 4 47 43 4:00 PM 30 20 10 4 6 47 41 5:00 PM 33 20 13 3 10 48 38 6:00 PM 36 20 16 5 11 45 34 7:00 PM 39 20 19 5 14 36 22 8:00 PM 39 20 19 6 13 38 25 9:00 PM 39 20 19 8 11 53 42 Source:Chen Ryan Associates,April 2017 During weekdays,the project's parking demand peak period would occur between 7 PM and 9 PM. During this peak period, it is anticipated that Lot 1 would be fully utilized and a maximum of 14 cars would utilize Lot 2,which has more than sufficient capacity to accommodate the demand. 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use Traffic Study Appendix Page 47 of 72 Table 4—201 Third Avenue Project Demand on Weekends Project Time Deiiiand • �- • �- 7:00 AM 31 20 11 10 1 65 64 8:00 AM 30 20 10 10 0 65 65 9:00 AM 30 20 10 9 1 61 60 10:00 AM 28 20 8 8 0 58 58 11:00 AM 27 20 7 6 1 54 53 12:00 PM 26 20 6 6 0 51 51 1:00 PM 27 20 7 9 0 51 51 2:00 PM 27 20 7 9 0 52 52 3:00 PM 27 20 7 8 0 56 56 4:00 PM 29 20 9 10 0 55 55 5:00 PM 32 20 12 11 1 53 52 6:00 PM 34 20 14 11 3 52 49 7:00 PM 37 20 17 10 7 49 42 8:00 PM 37 20 17 9 8 39 31 9:00 PM 38 20 18 11 7 50 43 Source:Chen Ryan Associates,April 2017. During weekends,the project's parking demand peak period would occur between 7 PM and 9 PM. During this peak period, it is anticipated that Lot 1 would be fully utilized and a maximum of eight cars would utilize Lot 2,which has more than sufficient capacity to accommodate the demand. 230 Church Avenue Project Based on the location of the proposed 230 Church Avenue project,the closest parking lots are Lot 10 and Lot 2. It is assumed that project residents would first utilize the excess parking capacity in Lot 10 due to the shorter walking distance to the proposed project, with the remaining excess demand utilizing Lot 2. Additionally,there are currently 29 public parking spaces provided at the Church Avenue project location (Lot B),which current demand will be displaced by the proposed project.To accommodate for the current parking demand in the vicinity of the project,the average displaced parking demand in Lot B was added to the total parking demand generated by the proposed 230 Church Avenue project. Tables 5 and 6 display the parking conditions for the proposed 230 Church Avenue Project during weekdays and weekends, respectively. 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use Traffic Study Appendix Page 48 of 72 Table 5—230 Church Avenue Project Demand on Weekdays 7:00 AM 40 24 16 4 20 24 0 65 65 8:00 AM 38 24 14 7 21 22 0 62 62 9:00 AM 36 24 12 11 23 17 6 50 44 10:00 AM 34 24 10 17 27 9 18 46 28 11:00 AM 32 24 8 20 28 6 22 42 20 12:00 PM 30 24 6 20 26 6 20 41 21 1:00 PM 32 24 8 20 28 5 23 41 18 2:00 PM 32 24 8 19 27 7 20 43 23 3:00 PM 32 24 8 18 26 5 21 43 22 4:00 PM 34 24 10 16 26 5 21 41 20 5:00 PM 38 24 14 13 27 5 22 38 16 6:00 PM 42 24 18 9 27 11 16 34 18 7:00 PM 46 24 22 8 30 14 16 22 6 8:00 PM 46 24 22 4 26 15 11 25 14 9:00 PM 47 24 23 3 26 19 7 42 35 Source:Chen Ryan Associates,April 2017. Note: 'Lot 2 Availability assumes excess parking demand from the proposed 201 Third Street project(See Table 3) During weekdays,the proposed project and displaced parking from Lot B would fully utilize the available capacity in Lot 10 throughout the entire day. The additional parking demand, not accommodated by Lot 10, would utilize the excess capacity in Lot 2. As shown in the table, Lot 2 currently has the additional capacity available to accommodate the Proposed Projects, as well as the displaced parking demand from Lot B. With the implementation of the Proposed Projects, Lot 2 should still maintain an excess parking capacity of six parking spaces, even during peak times on weekdays (7:00 PM). Therefore, the Third Avenue Village area has the additional parking capacity during weekdays, to accommodate the excess parking demand of both projects participating in the City's Urban Core Specific Plan. 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use Traffic Study Appendix Page 49 of 72 Table 6—230 Church Avenue Project Demand on Weekends IP U Project • I• • LI.Time Demand ,,,On, �• o , 7:00 AM 41 24 17 4 21 25 0 64 64 8:00 AM 38 24 14 7 21 23 0 65 65 9:00 AM 36 24 12 11 23 21 2 60 58 10:00 AM 34 24 10 17 27 15 12 58 46 11:00 AM 32 24 8 20 28 12 16 53 37 12:00 PM 30 24 6 20 26 11 15 51 36 1:00 PM 32 24 8 20 28 10 18 51 33 2:00 PM 32 24 8 19 27 11 16 52 36 3:00 PM 32 24 8 18 26 12 14 56 42 4:00 PM 34 24 10 16 26 12 14 55 41 5:00 PM 38 24 14 13 27 14 13 52 39 6:00 PM 42 24 18 9 27 11 16 49 33 7:00 PM 46 24 22 8 30 10 20 42 22 8:00 PM 46 24 22 4 26 11 15 31 16 9:00 PM 47 24 23 3 26 14 12 43 31 Source:Chen Ryan Associates,April 2017. Note: 'Lot 2 Availability assumes excess parking demand from the proposed 201 Third Street project(See Table 4) During weekends,the proposed project and displaced parking from Lot B would fully utilize the available capacity in Lot 10 throughout the entire day. The additional parking demand, not accommodated by Lot 10, would utilize the excess capacity in Lot 2. As shown in the table, Lot 2 currently has the parking capacity available to accommodate the Proposed Project as well as the displaced parking demand from Lot B. With the implementation of the Proposed Projects, Lot 2 should maintain an excess capacity of at least 16 parking spaces, even during peak times on the weekends (8:00 PM).Therefore,the Third Avenue Village area has the available parking capacity, during weekends, to accommodate the excess parking demand of both projects participating in the City's Urban Core Specific Plan. Conclusion Based on the observed parking occupancy counts and the anticipated parking demand of both projects, the public parking located within the Third Avenue Village would be able to accommodate the off-site parking demand for both of the proposed projects, as described below: 201 Third Avenue — The off-site parking demand from the 201 Third Avenue project could be accommodated with the excess parking capacity in Parking Lots 1 and 2. As shown in Tables 3 and 4, 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use Traffic Study Appendix Page 50 of 72 Lots 1 and 2 were observed to have sufficient excess parking capacity to absorb the off-site project parking demand during all times of the day, and would still have a surplus of 22 parking spaces during peak times (weekdays between7:00 PM and 8:00 PM). 230 Church Street - The off-site parking demand from the 230 Church Street project could be accommodated with the excess parking capacity in Parking Lots 10 and 2. As shown in Tables 5 and 6, Lots 10 and 2 were observed to have sufficient excess parking capacity to absorb the off-site project parking demand for both proposed projects, during all times of the day, and would still have a surplus of six parking spaces during peak times (weekdays between7:00 PM and 8:00 PM). The proposed projects are only projected to utilize the excess capacity from three of the public parking lots within the Downtown Parking District (Lots 1, 2 and 10). Parking Lot 3 (115 spaces) will also be available to project residents; however, based on the projects' parking demand calculations, the excess capacity in Lot 3 will typically not be needed. The Downtown Parking District has seven total parking lots, which provide 951 total off-street parking spaces to the public. As shown in Tables 3-6, the proposed projects are only projected to use a maximum of 42 of the 951 total off-site spaces at any given time (4%). Additionally,there are currently over 500 public on-street parking spaces within the district, not included in this study,that serve the commercial uses within the third street corridor in addition to the off-street lots. Therefore,the projects'parking demands would not create a parking deficit within the projects sites, or within their surrounding area. 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use Traffic Study Appendix Page 51 of 72 S. Parking Regulations Development proposals within the Urban Core Specific Plan area shall comply with the type, location, and number of parking spaces established for residential and non-residential land uses as specifi ed herein. For residential uses, a minimum amount of parking has been designated for use by the residents of the project. In addition, an amount of guest parking has been planned. Guest parking is arrived at by multiplying the cumulative total number of project dwelling units by the guest parking ratio. A percentage of the required parking must be provided onsite as indicated on the zoning sheets for each subdistrict. Parking is onsite if it is within the project, provided on an adjacent site, and/or within a comprehensive development/ ; center. Parking is allowed offsite if it is within 500-feet of the project and/or provided as an alternative in lieu (e.g. transit, ride-share, fl ex, etc.). Offsite parking must be accessible from publicly available pedestrian access and assured in terms of reservation in perpetuity, for the use it serves or an alternative replacement plan will be required. 9, Pedestrian Connections and Walkways Additional side setbacks may be required for pedestrian connections such as mid-block paseos. VI-13 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use Traffic Study Appendix Page 52 of 72 r a Jv lid �r P 1 r r ^ x i v �t t I r D .L 1^ 1 Pytz r_r tr-s _tsr,,:s � _._ Fmk I _ i y w d— r��o_r�. .'r� .� _ter__ 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use Traffic Study Appendix Page 53 of 72 Appendix K SANDAL and ITE Trip Rates 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use Traffic Study Appendix Page 54 of 72 (NOT SO) BRIEF GUIDE OF VEHICULAR TRAFFIC GENERATION RATES Q. FOR THE SAN DIEGO REGION 401 B Street,Suite 800 San Diego,California 92101 APRIL 2002 (61 9)699-1900•Fax(619)699-1950 NOTE:This listing only represents a guide of average,or estimated,traffic generation"driveway"rates and some very general trip data for land uses(emphasis on acreage and building square footage) in the San Diego region. These rates(both local and national)are subject to change as future documentation becomes available,or as regional sources are updated. For more specific information regarding traffic data and trip rates, please refer to the San Diego Traffic Generators manual.Always check with local jurisdictions for their preferred or applicable rates. LAND USE TRIP CATEGORIES ESTIMATED WEEKDAY VEHICLE HIGHEST PEAK HOUR%(plus IN:OUT ratio) TRIP LENGTH [PRIMARY:DIVERTED:PASS-BY]' TRIP GENERATION RATE (DRIVEWAY) Between 6:00-9:30 A.M. Between 3:00-6:30 P.M. (Miles)` AGRICULTURE(Open Space)_.......................180:18:21 2/acre** 10.8 AIRPORT........................................................[78:20:21 12.5 Commercial 60/acre,100/flight,70/1000 sq.ft.*** 5'A (6:4) 63". (5:5) General Aviation 6/acre,2/flight,6/1based aimmft*** 9Y (7:3) 15% (5:5) Heliports 100/acm** AUTOMOBILES Car Wash Automatic 900/site,600/acre** 4/0 (5:5) B'A (5:5) Self-serve 100/washstall** 41A (5:5) 9A (5:5) Gasoline....................................................[21:51:281 2.8 with/Food Mart 160/vehiclefuelingspace** TA (5:5) 8'A (5:5) wfth/Food Mart&Car Wash 155/vehiclefuelingspace** 8Y (5:5) 9'A (5:5) Older Service Station Design 150/vehiclefueling space,900/station** P/ (5:5) 9'A (5:5) Sales(Dealer&Repair) 50/1000 sq.ft.,300/acre,60/servicestall*** 5%/6 (7:3) 8'A (4:6) Auto Repair Center 20/1000 sq,ft.,400/acre,20/service stall* 8'A (7:3) 11% (4:6) Auto Parts Sales 60/1000 sq.ft.** 4A 10% Quick Lube 40/service stall** TA (6:4) 109% (5:5) Tire Store 25/1000 sq.ft.,30/service stall** 7Y (6:4) 11% (5:5) CEMETERY 5/acre* CHURCH(or Synagogue)................................[64:25:111 9/1000 sq.ft.,30/acre**(quadruple rates 5'A (6:4) Sib (5:5) 5.1 for Sunday,ordays of assembly) COMMERCIAL/RETAILs Super Regional Shopping Center 35/1000 sq.ft.,'400/acm* 4'A (7:3) 10% (5:5) (More than 80 acres,more than 800,000 sq.ft.,w/usually 3+ maidrstores) Regional Shopping Center.........................[54:35:111 5011000 sq.ft."'500/acre* 4% (7:3) 9,e (5:5) 5.2 (40-80acres, 400,000-800,000 sq.ft.,w/usually2+majorstoms) Community Shopping Center.................. [47:31:221 80/1000 sq.ft.,700/acre*** 4% (6:4) 10% (5:51 3.6 (15-40 acres,125,000-400,000 sq.ft., w/usually 1 major store,detached no.aumnt(s),grocery and drugstons) Neighborhood Shopping Center 120/1000 sq.ft.,1200/acre*** 4A (6:4) 10% (5:5) (Less than 15 acres,less than 125,000 sq.ft.,w/usually grocery &drugstore,cleaners,beauty&barber shop, &fast food services) Commercial Shops......................................[45:40:151 Specialty Retaillstrip Commercial 40/1000 sq.ft.,400/acre- 3'A (6:4) 9'A (5:5) 4.3 Electronics Superstore 50/1000 sq.ft** 1091 15:5) Factory Outlet 40/1000 sq.ft.** 3'A (7:3) 9% (5:5) Supermarket 150/1000 sq.ft.,2000/acre*** 411. (7:3) 10% (5:5) Drugstore 90/1000 sq,ft.** 4A (6:4) 10% (5:5) Convenience Market 05-16 hours) 500/1000 sq.ft.** 8'A (5:5) By. (5:5) Convenience Market(24 hours) 700/1000 sq.ft.** 9A (5:5) T/o (5:5) Convenience Market(w/gasoline pumps) 850/1000 sq.ft.,550/vehiclefueling space** 6A (5:5) TA (5:5) Discount Club 60/1000 sq.ft.,600/acre*** PA (7:3) 9'A (5.5) Discount Store 60/1000 sq.ft.,600/acre** 3'A (6:4) 8'A (5:5) Fumdu"Store 6/1000 sq.ft.,100/acre** 41/6 (7:3) 916 (5:5) Lumber Store 30/1000 sq.ft.,150/acre— TA (6:4) 9'/0 (5:5) Home Improvement Superstore 40/1000 sq.ft.** 5'A (6:4) 8'A (5:5) Hardware/Paint Store 60/1000 sq.ft.,600/acre** PA (6:4) 936 (5:5) Garden Nursery 40/1000 sq.ft.,90/acre** 3% (6:4) 109/6 (5:5) Mixed Use:Commercial(w/supermarket)/Residential (110/1000 sq.ft.,2000/acm*(commercial only) 3'/0 (6:4) 9'A (5:5) L5/dwelling unit,200/acre-(residential only) 9A (3:7) 13% (6:4) EDUCATION University(4 years).......................................(91:9:01 2.4/student,100 acre* 10% (8:2) 9:0 (3:7) 8.9 Junior College(2 years)................................[92:7:11 1.2/student,24/1000 sq.ft.,1 20/acre*+* 12% (8:2) 9°A (6:4) 9.0 High School...............................................[75:19:61 1.3/student,15/1000 sq.ft.,60/acm*** 20% (7:3) 10% (4:6) 4.8 Middle/Junior High_ ............................[63:25:121 1.4/student,12/1000 sq.ft. 50/acm** 30% (6:4) 9 (4:6) 5.0 Elementary...............................................[57:25:101 1.6/student,14/1000 sq.ft.,90/acre-** 32% (6:4) 9% (4:6) 3.4 Day Care.................................................[28:58:141 5/child,80/1000 sq.ft.** 17% (5:5) 18% (5:5) 3.7 FINANCIALS..................................................[35:42:231 3.4 Bank(Walk-in only) 150/1000sq.ft.,1000/acre*** 41% (7:3) 8'A (4:6) with Drive-Through 200/1000 sq.ft.,1500/acre* 9/ 16:4) 10','0 (5:5) Drive-Thmughonly 250(125 one-way)/lane* 3'A (5:5) 13% (5:5) Savings&Loan 60/1000 sq.ft.,600/acre** T✓ By. Drive-Throughonly 100(50 one-way)/lane— 4% 15% HOSPITAL......................................................[73:25:21 8.3 General 20/bed, 2511000 sq. ft., 250/acre- 8'A (7:3) 10% (4:6) Convalescent/Nursing 3/bed** TA (6:4) 7% (4:6) INDUSTRIAL Industrial/Business Park(commemial included)........[79:19:21 16/1000sq.ft.,200/acm*** 12% (8:2) 12°0 (2:8) 9.0 Industrial Park(no commercial) 8/1000 sq.ft.,90/acm** 11% (9:1) 12% (2:8) Industrial Plant Imunipleshifts)....._......................[92:5:31 10/1000 sq. ft., 120/acre* 14% (8:2) 15% (3:7) 11.7 Manufacturing/Assembly 4/1000 sq.ft.,50/acm*' 19% (9:1) 20% (2:8) Warehousing 5/1000 sq.ft.,60/acm** 13% (7:3) 15% (4:6) Storage 2/1000 sq. ft., 0.2/vault,30/acre* 6'A (5:5) 9%. (5:5) Science Research&Development 811000 sq.ft., 80/acre* 16% (9:1) 14% (1:9) Landfill&Recycling Center 6/acre 11% (5:5) 10% (4:6) (OVER) MEMBER AGENCIES.Cities of Carlsbad,Chula Vista,Coronado,Del Mar,EI Cajon,Encinitas.Escondido,Imperial Beach,La Mesa,Lemon Grove,National City. Oceanside,Povay,San Diego,San Marcos,Santee,Solana Beach,Vista and County of San Diego. ADVISORY(UAISON MEMBERS.California Department of Transportation,County Water Authority,U.S.Department of Defense,S Unified Port District and Tijuana/Baja California. 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use Traffic Study Appendix Page 55 of 72 LAND USE TRIP CATEGORIES ESTIMATED WEEKDAY VEHICLE HIGHEST PEAK HOUR%(plus IN:OUT ratio) TRIP LENGTH [PRIMARY:DIVERTED:PASS-BYji` TRIP GENERATION RATE (DRIVEWAY) Between 6:00-9:30 A.M. Between 3:00-6:30 P.M. (Miles)' LIBRARY..........................................................(44:44:121 50/1000 sq.ft-400/acre" 2X (7:3) 109/. (5:5) 3.9 LODGING.............................................................[58:38A] 7,6 Hotel(w1carivendon facilities/restaurant) 10/occupied room,300/acre El. (6:4) (6:4) Motel 9/occupied room,200/acre' EDG (4:6) 9/. (6:4) Resort Hotel 8/occupied room,100/acre' 5,' (6:4) -Pl. (4:6) Business Hotel 7/occupied room*- 9/6 (4:6) 9/E (5:4) MILITARY............. .................................[82:16:2] 2.5/military&civilian personnel 9% (9:1) 10% (2:6) 11.2 OFFICE Standard Commercial Office.................................[77:19:4] 20/1000 sq.ft.,c 300/acre` 14% (9:1) 13% (2:8) 8.8 (less than 100,000 sq,ft.) Large(High-Rise)Commercial Office [82:15:3] 17/1000 sq.ft.,-600/acre` 13% (9:1) 14% (2:8) 10.0 (more than 100,000 sq.ft.,6+stories) Office Park(400,000,sq.ft.) 12/1000 sq.ft.,200/acre' 9:1 Single Tenant Office 1411000 sq. ft., 180/.c,.:, 1S-A 13% � (2:8}9;1 1 3%15% 2:8 8.8 Corporate Headquarters 7/1000 sq.ft., 110/acre` 17% (9:1) 16% (1:9) Government(Civic Center)...............................[50:34:16] 3011000 sq.ft. TIE (9:1) 12% (3:7) 6.0 Post Office Central/Walk-In Only 90/1000sq.ft.-- T/. Community(net including mail drop lane) 200/1000 sq.ft.,1300/acre` ff/ (6:4) T/ (5:5) Community(w/mail drop lane) 300/1000 sq.ft.,2000/ac e- -Pl. (5:5) 1T/ (5:5) Mail Drop Lane only 1500(750one-way)/lane' T1. (5:5) 12-/. (5:5) Department of Motor Vehicles 180/1000 sq,ft.,900/acre' 61 (6:4) 103/6 (4:6) Medical-Dental .......................... [60:30:101 50/1000 sq.ft.,500/acre` EF/ (8:2) 11% (3:7) 6.4 PARKS [66:28:6] a/ 5.4 City �d'e*ve'l*ojped w"/"m"e"e't'i*n"g"*rooms'**and*"s'p'*o**'m facilities) SO/acre' 13'/ (5:5) TIE (5:5) Regional(developed) 20/acre' Neighborhood/County(undeveloped) 5/acre(add for specific sport uses),6/picnic site* State(average 1000 acres) 1/acre,l0/picnic site*- Amusement(Theme) 60/acre,130/acre(summeronly)'* 5/ (6:4) San Diego Zoo 115/arse` Sea World 80/acre' RECREATION Beach,Ocean or Bay...........................................[52:39:9] 60011000 ft.shoreline,60/acre` 6.3 Beach,Lake(fresh water) 50/1000 ft.shoreline,5/acre` Bowling Center 30/1000 sq.ft.,300/acre,30/lane T1. (7:3) 11% (4:6) Campground 4/campshe -f/o EX. Golf Course 7/acre,40/hole, 700/course' T1. (8:2) Driving Range only 70/acre, 14/tee box* 31/. (7:3) Sly. (5:5) Man- 4/berth,20/acre' 3/ (3:7) T1. (6:4) Multi-purpose(miniature golf,video arcade,betting cage,etc.) 90/acre ?/ 61/6 Racquetball/Health Club 30/1000 sq. ft-, 300/acre, 40/court' 4/ (6:4) 9/. (6:4) Tennis Courts 16/acre,30/court'- 51/6 11% (5:5) Sports Facilities Outdoor Stadium 50/acre,0.2/seat' Indoor Arena 30/acre,0.1/seat' Racetrack 40/acre,0.6 seat' Theaters(multiplex w/matinee)...........................[66:17:17] 80/1000 sq.ft.,1.8/seat,360/screen' EV. (6:4) 6.1 RESIDENTIAL................................................. [86:11:3] 7.9 Estate,Urban or Rural 12/dwellimjumt'e W. (3:7) 103/ (7:3) (average 1-2 DU/acre) Single Family Detached 101dwelfingunit"i &/ (3:7) 1 Ol. (7:3) (average 3-6 DU/acre) Condominium 8/dwelling unit'R 5. (2:8) 10% (7:3) (or any multi-family 6-20 DU/acre) Apartment 6/dwelling unit EV. (2;3) T/. (7:3) (or any multi-family units more than 20 DU/acre) Military Housing(off-base,multi-family) (less than 6 DU/..,e) 8/dwelling unit T1. (3:7) 9X. (6:4) (6-20 DU/acre) 6/dwelling unit T/o (3:7) 9/. (6:4) Mobile Home Family 5/dwelling unit,40/acre' EV. (3:7) 11% (6:4) Adults Only 3/dwelling unit,20/acre- 9/ (3:7) 10% (6:4) Retirement Community 4/dwalling unit-* _'BG (4:6) 7/. (5:4) Congregate Care Facility 2.5/dwelling unit-' 41b (6:4) EP/. (5:5) RESTAURANT'.......................................... [51:37:12] 4.7 Quality 100/1000 sq.ft.,3/seat,500/acre' 'I/. (BA) 8B, (7:3) Sit-down,high turnover 160/1000 sq.ft.,6/seat,1 OOO/r.--- EB' (5:5) &K. (6:4) Fast Food(w/drive-through) 650/1000 sq.ft.,20/-.t,30001-m- T1. (5:5) T1. (5:5) Fast Food(without drive-through) 700/1000 sq.ft.'- 5% (6:4) 'Pl. (5:5) Delicatessen(7-4phri) 150/1000 sq.ft.,11/seat' 2/ (6:4) X% (3:7) TRANSPORTATION Bus Depot 25/1000 sq.ft. Truck-Farminal 10/1000 sq.ft-7/bay,BO/a- SM (4:6) &1. (5:5) Waterport/Madne Terminal 170/berth,12/acre" Transit Station(Light Rail w1parking) 300/acre,2112/parking space(4/occupied)'' 149/ (7:3) 153/6 (3:7) Park&Ride Lots 400/acre(600/paved acre), 14% (7:3) 15-/ (3:7) f5tparking space(8/occupied)' Primary source:San Diego Traffic Generators. Othersources:FTE Trip Generation Reportf6th Edrdni.Trip Generation Rates(other agencies and publications),various SANDAG&CALTRANS studies,reports and estimates. Trip category Pc.m.9-ind..-daily from].-I household surveys,often cannot be applied to very specific land uses,and do not include noresidentonvers (mnftSANDAGAna�ystsoffrip Diversion,revised November,1990): PRI MARY-one trip directly between origin and primary destination. DIVERTED.linked top(having one or more stops along the way to a primary destination)whose distance compared to direct distance>_1 mile. PASS-BY-undiverted or diverted,1 mile. Trip lengths are average weighted for all trips to and from general[,,it use site.(All trips system-wide average length-6.9 miles) Fitted-citsithan: Ln(H=0.502 Ln(x) :6.94511y T=total trips,x=1,000 sq.ft- Finisdi-quatkin: Lh(T)=0.756 Ln(x) 3.950 Hued curv..q.d.r: t=-2.169 Ln(d),12.85 t=hips/DU,d=density(DU/acre).DU=dwelling unit Suggested PASS-BY[undiverted,rdiverted<1 mile]percentages for trip rate reductions only r Trip Reductions-In order to help promote regional",man,9-th'p.licies, dud ng P.M.peak period(based on combination o f I-I date/review and Other sour-, and acknowledge San Diego's,pending mass transit system.consider COMMERC AURETNIL vehicle top rate reductions(with proper dmumenudon and necessary Regional Shopping Center 33,6 adjustments for peak periods).The following are some examples: Commonly 303/. Neighborhood 4CM (1]A 5%daily trip reduction for land uses with transit access or.., Specialty Retail/Strip Commercial(other) 106 transit sted,ris accessible within 1/4 mile. Supermarket 4M� Convenience Market 5h [2]Up to 10%daily trip reduction Tormixed-use developments where DiscountClub/Store 30% residential and commercial retail are combined(cl-ristrat,mode FINANCIAL 25-IG split ofwalking trips to replace vehicular trips). Bank ALT MOBILE Ge-fir.Star- 5711; RESTAURANT Quality 1038 Sit-down high turnover 2DP6 Fast Food 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use Traffic Study Appendix Page 56 of 72 Coffee/Donut Shop Without Drive-Through Window (936) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 0 a.m. Number of Studies: 15 Average 1000 Sq, Feet GFA: 2 Directional Distribution: 51% entering, 49% exiting Trip Generationer 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation, 108.38 54.29 254.50 47.90 Data Plot and Equation ................... ... W f- 4 r _ 22 23 2- -- X = 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area Actual Data Points -- Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: Not given R2= ,,.. Trip Generation.9th Edition• InStltUte of Transportation Engineers 1937 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use Traffic Study Appendix Page 57 of 72 Appendix L Existing plus Project LOS Calculations 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use Traffic Study Appendix Page 58 of 72 AM Existing + Project 1: Third Avenue & E Street HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary M6vement - EBL FBT `EBR wBL V1!BT V1/BR ''EVBL `NBT w "NBR SBL SBT ,SBR Lane Configurations r Volume(veh/h) 24 342 58 103 524 75 72 153 60 58 69 24 Number 1 6 16 5 2 12 7 4 14 3 8 18 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.96 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow,vehlh/In 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 25 360 61 108 552 79 76 161 63 61 73 25 Adj No, of Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 38 1241 208 139 1451 207 98 569 212 78 405 332 Arrive On Green 0.02 0.41 0.41 0.08 0.47 0.47 0.06 0.23 0.23 0.04 0.22 0.22 Sat Flow,veh/h 1774 3015 505 1774 3098 442 1774 2491 928 1774 1863 1527 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 25 210 211 108 314 317 76 112 112 61 73 25 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1774 1770 1750 1774 1770 1770 1774 1770 1649 1774 1863 1527 Q Serve(g_s),s 1.1 6.3 6.4 4.7 9.1 9.2 3.3 4.1 4.5 2.7 2.5 1.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 1.1 6.3 6.4 4.7 9.1 9.2 3.3 4.1 4.5 2.7 2.5 1.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.29 1.00 0.25 1.00 0.56 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 38 728 720 139 829 829 98 404 377 78 405 332 V/C Ratio(X) 0.66 0.29 0.29 0.78 0.38 0.38 0.77 0.28 0.30 0.78 0.18 0.08 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 146 728 720 302 829 829 235 404 377 213 405 332 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 38.5 15.6 15.6 35.8 13.6 13.6 36.9 25.2 25.3 37.5 25.2 24.7 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 17.8 1.0 1.0 8.9 1.3 1.3 12.1 1.7 2.0 15.2 1.0 0.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °/pile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 0.7 3.2 3.3 2.7 4.7 4.8 2.0 2.2 2.2 1.7 1.4 0.5 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 56.3 16.6 16.6 44.7 14.9 15.0 49.0 26.8 27.3 52.7 26.2 25.1 LnGrp LOS E B B D B B D C C D C C Approach Vol,veh/h 446 739 300 159 Approach Delay,s/veh 18.8 19.3 32.6 36.2 Approach LOS B B C D Timer 1. 2 , 3., 4 5 6 7 8 Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 6.2 42.0 8.0 23.0 10.7 37.5 8.9 22.1 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.5 4.9 4.5 4.9 4.5 4.9 4.5 4.9 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 6.5 37.1 9.5 18.1 13.5 30.1 10.5 17.1 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+11),s 3.1 11.2 4.7 6.5 6.7 8.4 5.3 4.5 Green Ext Time(p-c),s 0.0 6.3 0.0 1.2 0.1 6.0 0.1 1.2 Intersection Summary , HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 23.2 HCM 2010 LOS C LOS Engineering,Inc. 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use Traffic Study Appendix Page 59 of 72 PM Existing + Project 1: Third Avenue & E Street HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Movement ' EBL EBT" EBR' ,:VViIBL - WBT.. V�BR NBL . , NBT= NBR =S8L ",.SBT..rj SBR Lane Configurations ' tl� Volume(veh/h) 37 619 157 151 456 102 93 120 133 165 153 57 Number 1 6 16 5 2 12 7 4 14 3 8 18 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.94 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 39 645 164 157 475 106 97 125 139 172 159 59 Adj No.of Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 51 974 247 193 1238 274 125 342 288 210 449 358 Arrive On Green 0.03 0.35 0.35 0.11 0.43 0.43 0.07 0.19 0.19 0.12 0.24 0.24 Sat Flow,veh/h 1774 2762 701 1774 2859 633 1774 1770 1488 1774 1863 1486 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 39 413 396 157 293 288 97 125 139 172 159 59 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1774 1770 1693 1774 1770 1722 1774 1770 1488 1774 1863 1486 Q Serve(g_s),s 1.8 16.3 16.4 7.2 9.3 9.4 4.5 5.1 6.9 7.8 5.9 2.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 1.8 16.3 16.4 7.2 9.3 9.4 4.5 - 5.1 6.9 7.8 5.9 2.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.41 1.00 0.37 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 51 624 597 193 766 746 125 342 288 210 449 358 WC Ratio(X) 0.77 0.66 0.66 0.81 0.38 0.39 0.78 0.37 0.48 0.82 0.35 0.16 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 133 624 597 268 766 746 221 342 288 289 449 358 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 40.0 22.6 22.7 36.1 16.0 16.0 37.9 29.0 29.7 35.7 26.1 24.8 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 21.1 5.5 5.7 12.3 1.4 1.5 10.0 3.0 5.7 12.4 2.2 1.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 1.2 8.9 8.5 4.2 4.9 4.8 2.5 2.8 3.3 4.5 3.3 1.2 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 61.1 28.1 28.4 48.4 17.4 17.5 47.9 32.0 35.4 48.0 28.2 25.8 Ln Grp LOS E C C D B B D C D D C C Approach Vol,veh/h 848 738 361 390 Approach Delay,s/veh 29.7 24.0 37.6 36.6 Approach LOS C C D D 3 . ,,. 5,,. .. Timer..;' �2 7 , 8 Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 6.9 40.8 14.3 20.9 13.5 34.1 10.3 24.9 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.5 4.9 4.5 4.9 4.5 4.9 4.5 4.9 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 6.2 35.5 13.5 16.0 12.5 29.2 10.3 19.2 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+I1),s 3.8 11.4 9.8 8.9 9.2 18.4 6.5 7.9 Green Ext Time(p-c),s 0.0 8.8 0.1 1.4 0.1 5.8 0.1 1.9 Intersection Summary`- NCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 30.3 HCM 2010 LOS C LOS Engineering,Inc. 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use Traffic Study Appendix Page 60 of 72 AM Existing + Project With Urban Core Specific Plan Improvement 1: Third Avenue & E Street HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Movenlernt„ 'EI3 �mIt T, :,:EBk; WBL ttVBT ,UWBR NBL NBT NBR SBL sBT SBf Lane Configurations tT- 0 t if Volume(veh/h) 24 342 58 103 524 75 72 153 60 58 69 24 Number 1 6 16 5 2 12 7 4 14 3 8 18 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.96 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 25 360 61 108 552 79 76 161 63 61 73 25 Adj No. of Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 38 1241 208 139 1447 206 98 426 346 78 405 332 Arrive On Green 0.02 0.41 0.41 0.08 0.47 0.47 0.06 0.23 0.23 0.04 0.22 0.22 Sat Flow,veh/h 1774 3015 505 1774 3089 440 1774 1863 1514 1774 1863 1527 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 25 210 211 108 315 316 76 161 63 61 73 25 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1774 1770 1750 1774 1770 1760 1774 1863 1514 1774 1863 1527 Q Serve(g_s),s 1.1 6.3 6.4 4.7 9.1 9.2 3.3 5.8 2.7 2.7 2.5 1.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 1.1 6.3 6.4 4.7 9.1 9.2 3.3 5.8 2.7 2.7 2.5 1.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.29 1.00 0.25 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 38 728 720 139 829 825 98 426 346 78 405 332 V/C Ratio(X) 0.66 0.29 0.29 0.78 0.38 0.38 0.77 0.38 0.18 0.78 0.18 0.08 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 146 728 720 302 829 825 235 426 346 213 405 332 NCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 38.5 15.6 15.6 35.8 13.6 13.6 36.9 25.8 24.6 37.5 25.2 24.7 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 17.8 1.0 1.0 8.9 1.3 1.3 12.1 2.5 1.2 15.2 1.0 0.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 0.7 3.2 3.3 2.7 4.8 4.8 2.0 3.3 1.2 1.7 1.4 0.5 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 56.3 16.6 16.6 44.7 14.9 15.0 49.0 28.3 25.7 52.7 26.2 25.1 LnGrp LOS E B B D B B D C C D C C Approach Vol,veh/h 446 739 300 159 Approach Delay,s/veh 18.8 19.3 33.0 36.2 Approach LOS B B C D er ` 12 3 4 5 6 7 8 Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 6.2 42.0 8.0 23.0 10.7 37.5 8.9 22.1 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.5 4.9 4.5 4.9 4.5 4.9 4.5 4.9 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 6.5 37.1 9.5 18.1 13.5 30.1 10.5 17.1 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+ll),s 3.1 11.2 4.7 7.8 6.7 8.4 5.3 4.5 Green Ext Time(p-c),s 0.0 6.3 0.0 1.0 0.1 6.0 0.1 1.1 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 23.3 HCM 2010 LOS C LOS Engineering,Inc. 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use Traffic Study Appendix Page 61 of 72 PM Existing + Project With Urban Core Specific Plan Improvement 1: Third Avenue & E Street HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Movement EBL_ EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR _. ,NBLiBT; NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tT+ tl+ r , Volume(veh/h) 37 619 157 151 456 102 93 120 133 165 153 57 Number 1 6 16 5 2 12 7 4 14 3 8 18 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.94 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 39 645 164 157 475 106 97 125 139 172 159 59 Adj No.of Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 . 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 51 974 247 193 1231 272 125 360 288 210 449 358 Arrive On Green 0.03 0.35 0.35 0.11 0.43 0.43 0.07 0.19 0.19 0.12 0.24 0.24 Sat Flow,veh/h 1774 2762 701 1774 2844 629 1774 1863 1488 1774 1863 1486 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 39 413 396 157 294 287 97 125 139 172 159 59 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/hlln 1774 1770 1693 1774 1770 1703 1774 1863 1488 1774 1863 1486 Q Serve(g_s),s 1.8 16.3 16.4 7.2 9.4 9.5 4.5 4.8 6.9 7.8 5.9 2.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 1.8 16.3 16.4 7.2 9.4 9.5 4.5 4.8 6.9 7.8 5.9 2.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.41 1.00 0.37 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 51 624 597 193 766 737 125 360 288 210 449 358 V/C Ratio(X) 0.77 0.66 0.66 0.81 0.38 0.39 0.78 0.35 0.48 0.82 0.35 0.16 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 133 624 597 268 766 737 221 360 288 289 449 358 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 40.0 22.6 22.7 36.1 16.0 16.0 37.9 28.9 29.7 35.7 26.1 24.8 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 21.1 5.5 5.7 12.3 1.5 1.5 10.0 2.6 5.7 12.4 2.2 1.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 1.2 8.9 8.5 4.2 4.9 4.8 2.5 2.7 3.3 4.5 3.3 1.2 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 61.1 28.1 28.4 48.4 17.4 17.6 47.9 31.5 35.4 48.0 28.2 25.8 LnGrp LOS E C C D B B D C D D C C Approach Vol,veh/h 848 738 361 390 Approach Delay,s/veh 29.7 24.1 37.4 36.6 Approach LOS C CD D Timer. .. .. 1 . 2 3 „ ,4 5 611 1 7 8 Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 6.9 40.8 14.3 20.9 13.5 34.1 10.3 24.9 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.5 4.9 4.5 4.9 4.5 4.9 4.5 4.9 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 6.2 35.5 13.5 16.0 12.5 29.2 10.3 19.2 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+11),s 3.8 11.5 9.8 8.9 9.2 18.4 6.5 7.9 Green Ext Time(p-c),s 0.0 8.8 0.1 1.3 0.1 5.8 0.1 1.6 Intersection Summary , HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 30.3 HCM 2010 LOS C LOS Engineering, Inc. 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use Traffic Study Appendix Page 62 of 72 Appendix M Near Turn LOS CalmlatiOns 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use Traffic Study Appendix Page 63 of 72 AM Near Term 1 : Third Avenue & E Street HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary -r• '�# �` �-- 'fit � �"'*' ``� ,� Movement EBT "';:WBT WBR N8L: . 'N8 T-' NBE BL 8f" SBl Lane Configurations ' , „ tT t Volume(veh/h) 24 344 57 100 531 76 67 152 54 59 70 24 Number 1 6 16 5 2 12 7 4 14 3 8 18 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.96 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 25 362 60 105 559 80 71 160 57 62 74 25 Adj No. of Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 38 1250 205 135 1450 207 92 585 199 80 413 338 Arrive On Green 0.02 0.41 0.41 0.08 0.47 0.47 0.05 0.23 0.23 0.04 0.22 0.22 Sat Flow,veh/h 1774 3026 496 1774 3098 442 1774 2561 871 1774 1863 1527 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 25 210 212 105 319 320 71 108 109 62 74 25 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1774 1770 1753 1774 1770 1770 1774 1770 1662 1774 1863 1527 Q Serve(g_s),s 1.1 6.3 6.4 4.6 9.3 9.3 3.1 4.0 4.3 2.7 2.6 1.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 1.1 6.3 6.4 4.6 9.3 9.3 3.1 4.0 4.3 2.7 2.6 1.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.28 1.00 0.25 1.00 0.52 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 38 731 724 135 828 829 92 404 380 80 413 338 V/C Ratio(X) 0.66 0.29 0.29 0.78 0.38 0.39 0.77 0.27 0.29 0.78 0.18 0.07 Avail Cap(c_a),vehlh 146 731 724 302 828 829 235 404 380 213 413 338 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 38.5 15.5 15.5 35.9 13.7 13.7 37.1 25.1 25.2 37.5 25.0 24.4 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 17.8 1.0 1.0 9.1 1.4 1.4 12.9 1.6 1.9 14.9 1.0 0.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 0.7 3.2 3.3 2.6 4.8 4.9 1.9 2.1 2.2 1.7 1.4 0.5 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 56.3 16.5 16.6 45.0 15.0 15.1 50.0 26.8 27.1 52.4 26.0 24.8 LnGrp LOS E B B D B B D C C D C C Approach Vol,veh/h 447 744 288 161 Approach Delay,s/veh 18.7 19.3 32.6 36.0 Approach LOS B B C D Timer, 1" 2 3 Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 6.2 42.0 8.1 23.0 10.6 37.6 8.6 22.5 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.5 4.9 4.5 4.9 4.5 4.9 4.5 4.9 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 6.5 37.1 9.5 18.1 13.5 30.1 10.5 17.1 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+11),s 3.1 11.3 4.7 6.3 6.6 8.4 5.1 4.6 Green Ext Time(p-c),s 0.0 6.4 0.0 1.2 0.1 6.0 0.0 1.2 Intersection Summary ,,a ,; . . HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 23.1 HCM 2010 LOS C LOS Engineering, Inc. 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use Traffic Study Appendix Page 64 of 72 PM Near Term 1 : Third Avenue & E Street HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Moenent 'EBL BBT. .EBRlB iJBT u�BR " NBL .>:NBT �NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tT+ ' tT+ ' t r Volume(veh/h) 37 622 155 144 465 103 92 119 130 166 153 58 Number 1 6 16 5 2 12 7 4 14 3 8 18 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.94 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 39 648 161 150 484 107 96 124 135 173 159 60 Adj No. of Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 51 984 244 186 1233 271 123 343 289 211 453 362 Arrive On Green 0.03 0.35 0.35 0.10 0.43 0.43 0.07 0.19 0.19 0.12 0.24 0.24 Sat Flow,veh/h 1774 2777 689 1774 2864 629 1774 1770 1489 1774 1863 1487 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 39 413 396 150 298 293 96 124 135 173 159 60 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1774 1770 1696 1774 1770 1723 1774 1770 1489 1774 1863 1487 Q Serve(g_s),s 1.8 16.2 16.2 6.8 9.5 9.6 4.4 5.0 6.6 7.9 5.8 2.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 1.8 16.2 16.2 6.8 9.5 9.6 4.4 5.0 6.6 7.9 5.8 2.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.41 1.00 0.36 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 51 627 601 186 762 742 123 343 289 211 453 362 V/C Ratio(X) 0.77 0.66 0.66 0.81 0.39 0.40 0.78 0.36 0.47 0.82 0.35 0.17 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 133 627 601 269 762 742 222 343 289 290 453 362 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 39.8 22.4 22.4 36.1 16.1 16.1 37.7 28.8 29.5 35.5 25.8 24.6 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 21.0 5.3 5.6 11.0 1.5 1.6 10.0 2.9 5.3 12.4 2.1 1.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 1.2 8.8 8.5 3.9 4.9 4.9 2.5 2.7 3.2 4.6 3.3 1.2 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 60.8 27.8 28.0 47.1 17.6 17.7 47.8 31.7 34.8 47.9 27.9 25.6 LnGrp LOS E C C D B B D C C D C C Approach Vol,veh/h 848 741 355 392 Approach Delay,siveh 29.4 23.6 37.2 36.4 Approach LOS C C D D Tinier 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 6.9 40.4 14.3 20.9 13.1 34.1 10.2 25.0 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.5 4.9 4.5 4.9 4.5 4.9 4.5 4.9 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 6.2 35.5 13.5 16.0 12.5 29.2 10.3 19.2 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+ll),s 3.8 11.6 9.9 8.6 8.8 18.2 6.4 7.8 Green Ext Time(p-c),s 0.0 8.9 0.1 1.5 0.1 5.9 0.1 1.9 Intersection Suifmary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 29.9 HCM 2010 LOS C LOS Engineering,Inc. 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use Traffic Study Appendix Page 65 of 72 AM Near Term With Urban Core Specific Plan Improvement 1: Third Avenue & E Street HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary ,u Movement EBL "EBT EBR WBL VtIBT, VVBR NBL° �� NBT '. NBR SBIR Lane Configurations I tT+ +� r Volume(veh/h) 24 344 57 100 531 76 67 152 54 59 70 24 Number 1 6 16 5 2 12 7 4 14 3 8 18 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.96 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 25 362 60 105 559 80 71 160 57 62 74 25 Adj No.of Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 38 1250 205 135 1446 206 92 425 346 80 413 338 Arrive On Green 0.02 0.41 0.41 0.08 0.47 0.47 0.05 0.23 0.23 0.04 0.22 0.22 Sat Flow,veh/h 1774 3026 496 1774 3089 440 1774 1863 1514 1774 1863 1527 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 25 210 212 105 319 320 71 160 57 62 74 25 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1774 1770 1753 1774 1770 1760 1774 1863 1514 1774 1863 1527 Q Serve(g_s),s 1.1 6.3 6.4 4.6 9.3 9.4 3.1 5.7 2.4 2.7 2.6 1.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 1.1 6.3 6.4 4.6 9.3 9.4 3.1 5.7 2.4 2.7 2.6 1.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.28 1.00 0.25 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 38 731 724 135 828 824 92 425 346 80 413 338 WC Ratio(X) 0.66 0.29 0.29 0.78 0.39 0.39 0.77 0.38 0.16 0.78 0.18 0.07 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 146 731 - 724 302 828 824 235 425 346 213 413 338 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 38.5 15.5 15.5 35.9 13.7 13.7 37.1 25.8 24.5 37.5 25.0 24.4 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 17.8 1.0 1.0 9.1 1.4 1.4 12.9 2.5 1.0 14.9 1.0 0.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %vile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 0.7 3.2 3.3 2.6 4.8 4.8 1.9 3.2 1.1 1.7 1.4 0.5 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 56.3 16.5 16.6 45.0 15.0 15.1 50.0 28.3 25.5 52.4 26.0 24.8 LnGrp LOS E B B D B B D C C D C C Approach Vol,veh/h 447 744 288 161 Approach Delay,s/veh 18.7 19.3 33.1 36.0 Approach LOS B B C D Timer 1 2 3 4 5 6" . 7:. . .`g Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 6.2 42.0 8.1 23.0 10.6 37.6 8.6 22.5 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.5 4.9 4.5 4.9 4.5 4.9 4.5 4.9 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 6.5 37.1 9.5 18.1 13.5 30.1 10.5 17.1 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+ll),s 3.1 11.4 4.7 7.7 6.6 8.4 5.1 4.6 Green Ext Time(p-c),s 0.0 6.4 0.0 1.0 0.1 6.1 0.0 1.1 -'1 -, -, . r.. . n, .. . Intersection Summary m,. .. HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 23,2 HCM 2010 LOS C LOS Engineering, Inc. 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use Traffic Study Appendix Page 66 of 72 PM Near Term With Urban Core Specific Plan Improvement 1: Third Avenue & E Street HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary MavameiitEBL.'.: B FBR VrIBC WBT. WBR NBL` . "NbT' NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ttPl t ' t r ' t r Volume(veh1h) 37 622 155 144 465 103 92 119 130 166 153 58 Number 1 6 16 5 2 12 7 4 14 3 8 18 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.94 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 39 648 161 150 484 107 96 124 135 173 159 60 Adj No.of Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 51 984 244 186 1226 269 123 361 289 211 453 362 Arrive On Green 0.03 0.35 0.35 0.10 0.43 0.43 0.07 0.19 0.19 0.12 0.24 0.24 Sat Flow,veh/h 1774 2777 689 1774 2849 625 1774 1863 1489 1774 1863 1487 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 39 413 396 150 299 292 96 124 135 173 159 60 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/hlln 1774 1770 1696 1774 1770 1704 1774 1863 1489 1774 1863 1487 Q Serve(g_s),s 1.8 16.2 16.2 6.8 9.6 9.7 4.4 4.7 6.6 7.9 5.8 2.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 1.8 16.2 16.2 6.8 9.6 9.7 4.4 4.7 6.6 7.9 5.8 2.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.41 1.00 0.37 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 51 627 601 186 762 734 123 361 289 211 453 362 V/C Ratio(X) 0.77 0.66 0.66 0.81 0.39 0.40 0.78 0.34 0.47 0.82 0.35 0.17 Avail Cap(c_a),vehlh 133 627 601 269 762 734 222 361 289 290 453 362 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 39.8 22.4 22.4 36.1 16.1 16.1 37.7 28.7 29.5 35.5 25.8 24.6 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 21.0 5.3 5.6 11.0 1.5 1.6 10.0 2.6 5.3 12.4 2.1 1.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),slveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.2 8.8 8.5 3.9 5.0 4.9 2.5 2.7 3.1 4.6 3.3 1.2 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 60.8 27.8 28.0 47.1 17.6 17.7 47.8 31.3 34.8 47.9 27.9 25.6 LnGrp LOS E C C D B B D C C D C C Approach Vol,veh/h 848 741 355 392 Approach Delay,s/veh 29.4 23.6 37.1 36.4 Approach LOS C C D D , Timer; "i . :2 3 4 5 .6 7 8 Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 6,9 40.4 14.3 20.9 13.1 34.1 10.2 25.0 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.5 4.9 4.5 4.9 4.5 4.9 4.5 4.9 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 6.2 35.5 13.5 16.0 12.5 29.2 10.3 19.2 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+11),s 3.8 11.7 9.9 8.6 8.8 18.2 6.4 7.8 Green Ext Time(p-c),s 0.0 8.9 0.1 1.3 0.1 5.9 0.1 1.6 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 29.9 HCM 2010 LOS C LOS Engineering, Inc. 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use Traffic Study Appendix Page 67 of 72 Appendix N Near Term plus ProieCt LOS CalCulations 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use Traffic Study Appendix Page 68 of 72 AM Near Term + Project 1: Third Avenue & E Street HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary r _ Movem.ent E8L; -EBT " > EBR WBL. ,WBT .WBR %NBL ' NBT' SBL SBT' SBR Lane Configurations tT-- ti.) ' tT+ ' t r Volume(veh/h) 24 346 59 104 531 76 74 155 61 60 71 24 Number 1 6 16 5 2 12 7 4 14 3 8 18 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.96 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 25 364 62 109 559 80 78 163 64 63 75 25 Adj No.of Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 38 1235 208 140 1449 207 101 568 212 81 404 331 Arrive On Green 0.02 0.41 0.41 0.08 0.47 0.47 0.06 0.23 0.23 0.05 0.22 0.22 Sat Flow,veh/h 1774 3012 507 1774 3098 442 1774 2488 930 1774 1863 1526 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 25 212 214 109 319 320 78 114 113 63 75 25 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1774 1770 1750 1774 1770 1770 1774 1770 1649 1774 1863 1526 Q Serve(g_s),s 1.1 6.4 6.5 4.8 9.3 9.3 3.4 4.2 4.5 2.8 2.6 1.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 1.1 6.4 6.5 4.8 9.3 9.3 3.4 4.2 4.5 2.8 2.6 1.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.29 1.00 0.25 1.00 0.56 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 38 726 718 140 828 828 101 404 376 81 404 331 V/C Ratio(X) 0.66 0.29 0.30 0.78 0.38 0.39 0.77 0.28 0.30 0.78 0.19 0.08 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 145 726 718 302 828 828 235 404 376 212 404 331 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(]) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 38.5 15.7 15.7 35.8 13.7 13.7 36.9 25.2 25.4 37.4 25.3 24.7 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 17.8 1.0 1.1 8.9 1.4 1.4 11.8 1.7 2.1 14.7 1.0 0.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 0.7 3.3 3.4 2.7 4.8 4.9 2.0 2.2 2.3 1.7 1.4 0.5 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 56.4 16.7 16.8 44.7 15.1 15.1 48.7 27.0 27.4 52.1 26.3 25.2 LnGrp LOS E B B D B B D C C D C C Approach Vol,veh/h 451 748 305 163 Approach Delay,s/veh 18.9 19.4 32.7 36.1 Approach LOS B B C D Timer 1 , 2 3, . 4 5 6 7 8 Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 6.2 42.0 8.1 23.0 10.8 37.4 9.0 22.1 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.5 4.9 4.5 4.9 4.5 4.9 4.5 4.9 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 6.5 37.1 9.5 18.1 13.5 30.1 10.5 17.1 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+11),s 3.1 11.3 4.8 6.5 6.8 8.5 5.4 4.6 Green Ext Time(p-c),s 0.0 6.4 0.0 1.2 0.1 6.1 0.1 1.3 jnfersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 23.3 HCM 2010 LOS C LOS Engineering,Inc. 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use Traffic Study Appendix Page 69 of 72 PM Near Term + Project 1 : Third Avenue & E Street HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Movement EBL' EBT EBR `:1NBL.:;..VrlBTWBR" NBL NB :'' BR '; AM Near Term + Project With Urban Core Specific Plan Improvement 1: Third Avenue & E Street HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Moyeinent EBL -EBT EBR �VBL -�WBT, ' 1�1BR �NBL' NBT NBR SBL,:, 5BF SBf Lane Configurations i, 0 Vii, 0 t r t r Volume(veh/h) 24 346 59 104 531 76 74 155 61 60 71 24 Number 1 6 16 5 2 12 7 4 14 3 8 18 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.96 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 25 364 62 109 559 80 78 163 64 63 75 25 Adj No.of Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 38 1235 208 140 1445 206 101 425 346 81 404 331 Arrive On Green 0.02 0.41 0.41 0.08 0.47 0.47 0.06 0.23 0.23 0.05 0.22 0.22 Sat Flow,veh/h 1774 3012 507 1774 3089 440 1774 1863 1514 1774 1863 1526 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 25 212 214 109 319 320 78 163 64 63 75 25 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1774 1770 1750 1774 1770 1760 1774 1863 1514 1774 1863 1526 Q Serve(g_s),s 1.1 6.4 6.5 4.8 9.3 9.4 3.4 5.9 2.7 2.8 2.6 1.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 1.1 6.4 6.5 4.8 9.3 9.4 3.4 5.9 2.7 2.8 2.6 1.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.29 1.00 0.25 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 38 726 718 140 828 823 101 425 346 81 404 331 V/C Ratio(X) 0.66 0.29 0.30 0.78 0.39 0.39 0.77 0.38 0.19 0.78 0.19 0.08 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 145 726 718 302 828 823 235 425 346 212 404 331 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 38.5 15.7 15.7 35.8 13.7 13.7 36.9 25.9 24.7 37.4 25.3 24.7 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 17.8 1.0 1.1 8.9 1.4 1.4 11.8 2.6 1.2 14.7 1.0 0.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °/vile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.7 3.3 3.4 2.7 4.8 4.8 2.0 3.3 1.2 1.7 1.4 0.5 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 56.4 16.7 16.8 44.7 15.1 15.1 48.7 28.5 25.8 52.1 26.3 25.2 LnGrp LOS E B B D B B D C C D C C Approach Vol,veh/h 451 748 305 163 Approach Delay,s/veh 18.9 19.4 33.1 36.1 Approach LOS B B C D Timer ` 1 2 3 4 5 6 ,7 .8 Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 6.2 42.0 8.1 23.0 10.8 37.4 9.0 22.1 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.5 4.9 4.5 4.9 4.5 4.9 4.5 4.9 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 6.5 37.1 9.5 18.1 13.5 30.1 10.5 17.1 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+ll),s 3.1 11.4 4.8 7.9 6.8 8.5 5.4 4.6 Green Ext Time(p-c),s 0.0 6.4 0.0 1.0 0.1 6.1 0.1 1.2 Intersection Summary'.=,. HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 23.4 HCM 2010 LOS C LOS Engineering,Inc. 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use Traffic Study Appendix Page 71 of 72 PM Near Term + Project With Urban Core Specific Plan Improvement 1: Third Avenue & E Street HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary m .., ,. Movement " EBL EBT. EBR . INBL ";WBT �V�IBR NBC NBT NBR SBL ,SBT SBR Lane Configurations , t r ,� t Volume(veh/h) 37 626 159 152 465 103 96 121 134 168 155 58 Number 1 6 16 5 2 12 7 4 14 3 8 18 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.94 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow,veh/h/In 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1900 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 Adj Flow Rate,veh/h 39 652 166 158 484 107 100 126 140 175 161 60 Adj No.of Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,veh/h 51 970 247 194 1232 270 128 359 287 213 448 357 Arrive On Green 0.03 0.35 0.35 0.11 0.43 0.43 0.07 0.19 0.19 0.12 0.24 0.24 Sat Flow,veh/h 1774 2761 702 1774 2849 625 1774 1863 1488 1774 1863 1486 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 39 418 400 158 299 292 100 126 140 175 161 60 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1774 1770 1693 1774 1770 1704 1774 1863 1488 1774 1863 1486 Q Serve(g_s),s 1.8 16.6 16.7 7.2 9.6 9.7 4.6 4.9 7.0 8.0 6.0 2.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 1.8 16.6 16.7 7.2 9.6 9.7 4.6 4.9 7.0 8.0 6.0 2.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.41 1.00 0.37 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 51 622 595 194 765 737 128 359 287 213 448 357 V/C Ratio(X) 0.77 0.67 0.67 0.81 0.39 0.40 0.78 0.35 0.49 0.82 0.36 0.17 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 132 622 595 267 765 737 220 359 287 288 448 357 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),s/veh 40.1 22.9 22.9 36.1 16.1 16.1 37.9 29.0 29.9 35.7 26.2 25.0 Incr Delay(d2),s/veh 21.2 5.7 6.0 12.6 1.5 1.6 9.8 2.7 5.8 13.0 2.2 1.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 1.2 9.1 8.8 4.2 5.0 4.9 2.6 2.8 3.3 4.7 3.4 1.2 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 61.3 28.5 28.8 48.8 17.6 17.7 47.7 31.7 35.7 48.6 28.5 26.0 LnGrp LOS E C C D B B D C D D C C Approach Vol,veh/h 857 749 366 396 Approach Delay,s/veh 30.2 24.2 37.6 37.0 Approach LOS C C D D Timer 1 - 2 3 ` . 4 5 8 Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 6.9 40.8 14.5 20.9 13.6 34.1 10.5 24.9 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.5 4.9 4.5 4.9 4.5 4.9 4.5 4.9 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 6.2 35.5 13.5 16.0 12.5 29.2 10.3 19.2 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+11),s 3.8 11.7 10.0 9.0 9.2 18.7 6.6 8.0 Green Ext Time(p-c),s 0.0 9.0 0.1 1.3 0.1 5.7 0.1 1.7 Irtersection Summa HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 30.6 HCM 2010 LOS C LOS Engineering,Inc. 201 Third Avenue Mixed Use Traffic Study Appendix Page 72 of 72 RESOLUTION NO. DR17-0039 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT DR17-0039 TO REDEVELOP THE SITE AT 201 THIRD AVENUE WITH A 5-STORY, 23- UNIT RESIDENTIAL APARTMENT BUILDING WITH 2,661 SQUARE- FEET OF COMMERCIAL SPACE, 20 ON-SITE AND 22 OFF-SITE PARKING SPACES, LANDSCAPED AREAS, AND RECREATIONAL OPEN SPACE, SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS CONTAINED HEREIN WHEREAS, on December 8, 2017, a duly verified application for a Design Review Permit was filed with the City of Chula Vista Development Services Department by Tierra del Sol Investments (Applicant); and WHEREAS, the application requests approval of a Design. Review Permit to redevelop the site at 201 Third Avenue with a 5-story, 23-unit apartment building, 2,661 square-feet of conZercial space, 20 on-site and 22 off-site parking spaces, landscaping, and recreational open space (Project); and WHEREAS, the area of land which is the subject of this Resolution is composed of one parcel with an area of 0.26 acres (11,500 square-feet) located at 201 Third Avenue (Project Site); and WHEREAS, the Director of Development Services has reviewed the Project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the Project was adequately covered in the previously adopted Final Environmental Impact Report FEIR 06-01 prepared for the Chula Vista Urban Core Specific Plan and certified by the City Council in May 2007. Thus, no fiirther environmental review is required; and WHEREAS, the Director of Development Services set the time and place for a hearing on the Design Review Permit application, and notice of the hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City and its mailing to property owners and residents within 500 feet of the exterior boundaries of the property at least 10 days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised, namely June 13, 2018, at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the Planning Commission and the hearing was thereafter closed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Chula Vista that it hereby makes the following findings: That the proposed Project is consistent with the development regulations and design guidelines of the Urban Core Specific Plan and other applicable regulations contained in the Chula Vista Municipal Code. PC Resolution DR 17-0039 June 13, 2018 Page 2 The proposed Project is consistent with the vision, objectives and policies of the General Plan and the land use development standards and regulations of the Urban Core Specific Plan. The Project would redevelop an existing vacant site and provide additional residential units and retail services within the City's downtown area with convenient access to public transit. The Project would contribute to provide multi-family housing to residents, who would take advantage of and support the local commercial businesses which provide a variety of goods and services. The Project would also provide retail commercial space and services for the community. Easy accessibility to public transit would also contribute to connect the project residents with other parts of the City and the region. The proposed Project is also consistent with the Urban Core Specific Plan development regulations related to land use, building height, Floor Area Ratio, setbacks, building wall frontage, parking, and landscaping and open space. That the proposed Project is consistent with the design requirements and recommendations contained in Chapter VII- Design Guidelines of the Urban Core Specific Plan. The proposed Project architecture features an Art Moderne/Art Deco architectural design consistent with the Urban Core Specific Plan Design Guidelines. The project design incorporates a dynamic, diagonal pattern of framing members at the corner tower element in response to Art Deco's characteristic chevron patterning and emphasis on vertical accents. The use of outstanding elements such as bold colors, a tower element, a vertical fin, and a roof deck, make the building stand out at this important corner and entry into the downtown. The overall design, form and scale of the building fit within the guidelines of the Urban Core Specific Plan's Village District and set a strong precedent for future development planned for downtown Chula Vista. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BASED ON THE FINDINGS ABOVE, hereby approves the Design Review Permit subject to the following conditions: 1. The following shall be accomplished to the satisfaction of the Director of Development Services, or designee,prior to issuance of Building Permits, unless otherwise specified: Planning Division 1. The Project Site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans, which include site plans,building elevations, floor plans, landscape and open space plans on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, the Urban Core Specific Plan and Title 19. 2. Prior to the initiation of any on-site development activities including demolition, grading, or construction, the Applicant shall participate in the County Department of Environmental Health(DEH) Voluntary Assistance program and receive written approval from the DEH that all on-site soil contamination issues have been adequately addressed. PC Resolution DR 17-0039 June 13, 2018 Page 3 3. The Applicant shall apply for a Building Permit and submit the required application, plans and fees to the satisfaction of the City Building Official. 4. Prior to, or in conjunction with the issuance of the first Building Permit, the Applicant shall pay all applicable fees, including any unpaid balances of permit processing fees for deposit account DDA0109. 5. Prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for the Project, the Applicant shall pay to the City the amount of$77,000 (22 x $3,500) as the In-Lieu-Parking Fee for 22 off-site parking spaces. 6. All private outdoor use areas with a direct line-of-sight to Third Avenue or E Street shall have a 3.5-foot high solid balcony barrier in order to reduce noise impacts to a level of 65 CNEL or less. 7. The residential units shall incorporate windows and glass doors with a minimum sound rating of STC 28. Additionally, as windows and glass doors must remain closed in order to maintain compliant interior noise levels, mechanical ventilation must be provided in all units. 8. A graffiti resistant treatment shall be specified for all first floor walls and building surfaces. This shall be noted for any building and wall plans and shall be reviewed and approved prior to the issuance of the first Building Permit. Additionally, the project shall conform to Section 9.20.055 of the Municipal Code regarding graffiti control. 9. All roof-mounted appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design. 10. All ground mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of walls and/or landscaping. 11. All exterior lighting shall include shielding to remove any glare from adjacent properties. Details for said lighting shall be included in the architectural plans and shall be reviewed and approved prior to the issuance of the first Building Permit. 12. The Project shall operate in compliance with the Performance Standards, Chula Vista Municipal Code Chapters 19.66 and Performance Standards and Noise Control, Chapter 19.68. 13. The Applicant shall obtain approval of a sign permit for each sign. Signs shall comply with all applicable requirements of the Chula Vista Municipal Code. PC Resolution DR 17-0039 June 13, 2018 Page 4 Building Division 14. This Project shall be designed by an Architect or Engineer licensed by the State of California. [California Business and Professional Code 5536.1, 6735]. 15. Plans shall include a Note on the cover sheet indicating this Project will comply with 2016 California Building Code, 2016 California Energy Code, 2016 California Fire Code, 2016 California Electrical Code, 2016 California Plumbing Code, 2016. California Mechanical Code, and 2016 California Green Standards Code as adopted and amended by the State of California and the City of Chula Vista. Landscape Architecture Division 16. Prior to issuance of the first Building Permit for the Project, the Applicant shall obtain approval of a "Landscape Documentation Package" that complies with the City's Landscape Water Conservation Ordinance, Municipal Code Chapter 20.12. 17. The addition of 23 multi-family units generates parkland obligations and is subject to Parkland Acquisition and Development (PAD). The Applicant shall pay PAD fees prior to issuance of the first Building Permit, or if deferred, prior to final building inspection at the rate in effect at that time. Land Development Division 18. The Applicant shall enter into a Storm Water Maintenance Agreement with the City prior to issuance of the first Building Permit for the Project. 19. The Applicant shall implement the soil recommendations provided within the Phase II Site Investigation Report prepared for the Project parcel dated May 23, 2017 by Environmental Navigation Services, Inc. 20. The following fees may be adjusted based on the final Building Plans submitted a. Sewer Connection and Capacity Fees b. Traffic Signal Fees c. Public Facilities Development Impact Fees (PFDIF) d. Western Transportation Development Impact Fees (WTDIF) e. Other Engineering Fees as applicable per the Master Fee Schedule. 21. Additional deposits or fees in accordance with the City Subdivision Manual, and Master Fee Schedule will be required for the submittal of the following items: a. Grading Plans b. Street Improvement Plans c. Constriction Permit PC Resolution DR17-0039 June 13,2018 Page 5 22. The Applicant shall obtain a Land Development Permit prior to beginning any earthwork activities at the Project Site and before issuance of Building Permits in accordance with Chula Vista Municipal Code Title 15.04. The Applicant shall submit Grading Plans in conformance with the City's Subdivision Manual and the City's Development Storm Water Manual requirements, including, but not limited to the following: a. Grading Plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer, or designee. b. Drainage Study and Geotechnical/Soils Investigations are required with the first submittal of Grading Plans. The Drainage Study shall calculate the Pre- Development and Post-Development flows and show how downstream properties and storm drain facilities are impacted. Design shall incorporate detention of storm water runoff if Post-Development flows exceed Pre-Development flows; analysis shall include flows from 2 yr, 10 yr, and 50 yr return frequency storms. c. The Drainage Study shall also demonstrate that no property damage will occur during the 100-year storm event. d. The Drainage Study shall show any offsite flows. e. All onsite drainage facilities shall be private. f. Any offsite work will require Letters of Permission from the affected property owner(s). 23. On May 2013, the California Regional Water Quality Control Board for the San Diego Region (SDRWQCB) reissued a municipal storm water, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit (Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems Order No. R9- 2013-0001 and as amended by Order Nos R9-2015-0001 & R9-2015-0100 (MS4 Permit) that covered its region. The Project shall comply with all requirements of the MS4 Permit and City of Chula Vista Best Management Practices (BMP) Design Manual, December 2015 and as amended (BMP Design Manual) for both constriction and post- construction phases of the project. Prior to issuance of a Land Development Pen-nit, documentation shall be provided, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, to demonstrate such compliance. A copy of the BMP Design Manual is available on the City of Chula Vista website at: http://www.chulavistaca.i�ov/departments/puiblic-works/services/storm- water-pollution-prevention/doeuments-and-reports. 24. The Applicant shall complete and submit the Storm Water Requirements Applicability Checklist (Intake Form) for All Permit Applications (see Appendix A.1 of the BMP Design Manual) with any Plamling Application request. 25. The Applicant shall submit a detailed Operation & Maintenance (O&M) plan for all permanent BMPs as required by the City Engineer to preserve the intended pollution control and/or flow control performance of the BMP. Upon completion of construction of BMPs/Project, the Applicant shall update/finalize the O&M Plan to reflect constructed structural BMPs with as-built plans and baseline photos. 26. The Applicant shall provide a street easement dedication for all right of way that does not align with the existing property line. Street dedication easements shall be reviewed by PC Resolution DRI 7-0039 June 13,2018 Page 6 City staff and recorded through a separate instrument prior to the issuance of the first Building Permit. 27. Prior to obtaining any Building Permit for the Project, if the Project's total on-site improvements exceed an Engineering Threshold of (currently: $57,653.00), per Chula Vista Municipal Code Section 12.24.030, then the Applicant shall be required to obtain a Construction Permit from the Land Development Section of the Department of Development Services. (The On-Site Improvements trigger for installation of Public Improvements is adjusted on an annual basis on July 1 based on the Engineer Construction Cost Index, See Attachment). A Construction Pennit is required to perform the following work in the City's right-of-way, which may include, but is not limited to: (For Commercial, Industrial and Multifamily Residential, the following applies: 1. Limits the cost of reconstructing existing street improvements to meet current standards to 25%of the building permit valuation. 2. Requires Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)pedestrian improvements in the right of way, if any are lacking or substandard. The required ADA improvements would be limited to 20%of the building permit valuation.) a) Removal and replacement of any broken or damaged curb, gutter, and sidewalk per SDRSD G-2, and G-7 along the project's frontage to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Sidewalk shall be designed and constructed with proper transitions to existing conditions. b) Removal of the existing driveways along Third Avenue and E Street and replacement of sidewalks meeting design standards as shown in Chula Vista Construction Standard CVCS-1. Dedication of public right of way as needed in order for driveway to comply with American Disability Act (ADA)requirements. c) All proposed sidewalks, walkways, pedestrian ramps, and disabled parking shall be designed to meet the City of Chula Vista Design Standards, ADA Standards, and Title 24 standards, as applicable. d) Utilities Trenching and Restoration per CVCS-3 & 4. 28. Separate permits for other public utilities (gas, electric, water, cable, telephone) shall be required, as necessary. 29. Any improvements in the public right-of-way beyond the project limits shall be designed and constructed as to not interfere with adjacent businesses, as approved by the City Engineer. 30. The construction and completion of all improvements and release requirements shall be secured in accordance with Section 18.16.180 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code. PC Resolution DR 17-0039 June 13,2018 Page 7 31. The Public Works Operations Section will have the right to inspect any existing sewer laterals and connections that are to be used by the Project. The Applicant agrees to replace laterals and connections that may need replacement as a result of this inspection. 32. The onsite sewer and storm drain system shall be private. All sewer laterals and storm drains shall be privately maintained from each building unit to the City-maintained public facilities. Fire Department 33. This project shall provide a fire flow of 2500 gallons per minute for at 2-hour duration at 20 p.s.i. 34. Based upon the required fire flow for mixed construction type(s), the Applicant shall provide a minimum of 3 fire hydrant(s) to serve this Project. 2 existing and 1 new public fire hydrant as stated in the condition below (#35). 35. Where a portion of the building is more than 400 feet from a fire hydrant on a fire apparatus access road, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building, on site fire hydrants and mains shall be provided. At least one new public hydrant will need to be placed on the SE corner of Third and E Street to meet this requirement. The existing fire hydrants on E Street cannot be counted as they are across a four-lane road. TI. The following on-going conditions shall apply to the Project Site as long as it relies on this approval: 36. The Project Site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans, which include Site Plans, Floor Plans, and Elevation Plans on file in the Planning Division, the Conditions contained herein, the Urban Core Specific Plan, and Title 19. 37. The Applicant shall install all landscaping and hardscape improvements in accordance with the approved Landscape Plan. 38. Approval of the Design Review Permit shall not waive compliance with any applicable sections of Title 19 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, nor any other applicable laws and regulations in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 39. The Property Owner and Applicant shall and do agree to indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless City, its City Council members, Planning Cormnission members, officers, employees and representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands, claims and costs, including court costs and attorney's fees (collectively, liabilities) incurred by the City arising, directly or indirectly, from (a) City's approval and issuance of this Design Review Pennit, (b) any CEQA causes of action and (c) City's approval or issuance of any other permit or action, whether discretionary or non- discretionary, in connection with the use contemplated on the Project Site. The Property PC Resolution DR 17-0039 June 13, 2018 Page 8 Owner and Applicant shall acknowledge their agreement to this provision by executing a copy of this Design Review Permit where indicated below. The Property Owner's and Applicant's compliance with this provision shall be binding on any and all of the Property Owner's and Applicant's successors and assigns. 40. This Design Review Permit shall become void and ineffective if not utilized within three years from the effective date thereof, in accordance with Section 19.14.600 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code. III. GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 66020(d)(1) NOTICE Pursuant to Governnent Code Section 66020(4) (1), NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the 90-day period to protest the imposition of any impact fee, dedication, reservation, or other exaction described in this resolution begins on the effective date of this resolution and any such protest must be in a manner that complies with Section 66020(a) and failure to timely follow this procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void or annul imposition. The right to protest the fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions does not apply to planning, zoning, grading, or other similar application processing fees or service fees in connection with this project; and it does not apply to any fees, dedication, reservations, or other exactions which have been given notice similar to this, nor does it revive challenges to any fees for which the statute of limitations has previously expired. IV. EXECUTION OF RESOLUTION OF APPROVAL The Property Owner and Applicant shall execute this document sighing on the lines provided below, indicating that the Property Owner and Applicant have each read, understood and agreed to the conditions contained herein, and will implement same. Upon execution, this document shall be signed and returned to the City's Development Services Department. Signature of Property Owner Date Printed Name of Property Owner Signature of Applicant Date Printed Name of Applicant PC Resolution DR 17-0039 June 13, 2018 Page 9 V. CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE OF CONDITIONS If any of the foregoing conditions fail to occur, or if they are, by their terms, to be implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to revoke or modify all approvals herein granted, deny, or further condition issuance of all fixture building permits, deny, revoke, or further condition all certificates of occupancy issued under the authority of approvals herein granted, institute and prosecute litigation to compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. Failure to satisfy the conditions of this permit may also result in the imposition of civil or criminal penalties. VI. INVALIDITY; AUTOMATIC REVOCATION It is the intention of the Plant-ting Commission that its adoption of this Resolution is dependent upon the enforceability of each and every term, provision and condition herein stated; and that in the event that any one or more terms, provisions or conditions are detennined by a Court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, this resolution and the pernnit shall be deemed to be automatically revoked and of no further force and effect. Presented by: Approved as to form by: Kelly Broughton Glen R. Googins Director of Development Services City Attorney PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, this 13th day of June 2018, by the following vote, to-wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Gabe Gutierrez, Chair ATTEST: Patricia Laughlin, Secretary RESOLUTION NO.DR17-0039 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT DR17-0039 TO REDEVELOP THE SITE AT 201 THIRD AVENUE WITH A 5-STORY, 23- UNIT RESIDENTIAL APARTMENT BUILDING WITH 2,661 SQUARE- FEET OF COMMERCIAL SPACE, 20 ON-SITE AND 22 OFF-SITE PARKING SPACES, LANDSCAPED AREAS, AND RECREATIONAL OPEN SPACE, SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS CONTAINED HEREIN WHEREAS, on December 8, 2017, a duly verified application for a Design Review Permit was filed with the City of Chula Vista Development Services Department by Tierra del Sol Investments (Applicant); and WHEREAS, the application requests approval of a Design Review Permit to redevelop the site at 201 Third Avenue with a 5-story, 23-unit apartment building, 2,561 square-feet of commercial space, 20 on-site and 22 off-site parking spaces, landscaping, and recreational open space (Project); and. WHEREAS, the area of land which is the subject of this Resolution is composed of one parcel with an area of 0.26 acres (11,500 square-feet) located at.201 Third Avenue (Project Site); and WHEREAS, the Director of Development Services has reviewed the Project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the Project was adequately covered in the previously adopted Final Environmental Impact Report FEIR 06-01 prepared for the Chula Vista Urban Core Specific Plan and certified by the City Council in May 2007. Thus,no further environmental review is required; and i WHEREAS, the Director of Development Services set the time and place for a hearing on the Design Review Permit application, and notice of the hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City and its mailing to property owners and residents within 500 feet of the exterior boundaries of the property at least 10 days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised, namely June 13, 2018, at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the Planning Commission and the hearing was thereafter closed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Chula Vista that it hereby makes the following findings: That the proposed Project is consistent with the development regulations and design ` guidelines of the Urban Core Specific Plan and other applicable regulations contained in the Chula Vista Municipal Code. PC Resolution DR 17-0039 June 13,2018 Page 2 The proposed Project is consistent with the vision, objectives and policies of the General Plan and the land use development standards and .regulations of the Urban Core Specific Plan. The Project would redevelop an existing vacant site and provide additional residential units and retail services within the City's downtown area with convenient access to public transit. The Project would contribute to provide multi-family housing to residents, who would take advantage of and support the local commercial businesses which provide a variety of goods and services. The Project would also provide retail commercial space and services for the community. Easy accessibility to public transit would also contribute to connect the project residents with other parts of the City and the region. The proposed Project is also consistent with the Urban Core Specific Plan development regulations related to land use, building height, Floor Area Ratio, setbacks, building wall frontage, parking, and landscaping and open space. That the proposed Project is consistent with the design requirements and recommendations contained in Chapter VII -Design Guidelines of the Urban Core Specific Plan. The proposed Project architecture features an Art Moderne/Art Deco architectural design consistent with the Urban Core Specific Plan Design Guidelines. The project design incorporates a dynamic, diagonal pattern of framing members at the corner tower element in response to Art Deco's characteristic chevron patterning and emphasis on vertical accents. The use of outstanding elements such as bold colors, a tower element, a vertical fin, and a roof deck, make the building stand out at this important corner and entry into the downtown. The overall design, form and scale of the building fit within the guidelines of the Urban Core 1 Specific Plan's Village District and set a strong precedent for future development planned for downtown Chula Vista. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BASED ON ' THE FINDINGS ABOVE, hereby approves the Design Review Permit subject to the following conditions: I. The following shall be accomplished to the satisfaction of the Director of Development Services,or designee,prior to issuance of Building Permits, unless otherwise specified; I Planning Division s 1. The Project Site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans, which include site plans,building elevations, floor plans, landscape and open space plans on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, the Urban Core Specific Plan and Title 19. s 2. Prior to the initiation of any on-site development activities including demolition, grading, or construction, the Applicant shall participate in the County Department of Environmental Health(DEH) Voluntary Assistance program and receive written approval from the DEH that all on-site soil contamination issues have been adequately addressed. PC Resolution DR 17-0039 June 13,2018 Page 3 3. The Applicant shall apply for a Building Permit and submit the required application, plans and fees to the satisfaction of the City Building Official, 4. Prior to, or in conjunction with the issuance of the first Building Permit, the Applicant shall pay all applicable fees, including any unpaid balances of permit processing fees for deposit account DDA0109. 5. Prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for the Project, the Applicant shall pay to the City the amount of$77,000 (22 x $3,500) as the In-Lieu-Parking Pee for 22 off-site parking spaces. 6. All private outdoor use areas with a direct line-of--sight to Third Avenue or E Street shall have a 3.5-foot high solid balcony barrier in order to reduce noise impacts to a level of 65 CNEL or less. 7. The residential units shall incorporate windows and glass doors with a minimum sound rating of STC 28. Additionally, as windows and glass doors must remain closed in order to maintain compliant interior noise levels, mechanical ventilation must be provided in all units. 8. A graffiti resistant treatment shall be specified for all first floor walls .and building surfaces. This shall be noted for any building and wall plans and shall be reviewed and approved prior to the issuance of the first Building Permit. Additionally, the project shall conform to Section 9.20.055 of the Municipal Code regarding graffiti control. 9. All roof-mounted appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design. 10. All ground mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of walls and/or landscaping. 11. All exterior lighting shall include shielding to remove any glare from adjacent properties. Details for said lighting shall be included in the architectural plans and shall be reviewed and approved prior to the issuance of the first Building Permit. 12. The Project shall operate in compliance with the Performance Standards, Chula Vista Municipal Code Chapters 19.66 and Performance Standards and Noise Control, Chapter 19.68. 13. The Applicant shall obtain approval of a sign permit for each sign. Signs shall comply with all applicable requirements of the Chula Vista Municipal Code. PC Resolution DR]7-0039 June 13,2018 Page 4 Building Division 14. This Project shall be designed by an Architect or Engineer licensed by the State of California. [California Business and Professional Code 5536.1, 6735]. 15. Plans shall include a Note on the cover sheet indicating this Project will comply with 2016 California Building Code, 2016 California Energy Code, 2016 California Fire Code, 2016 California Electrical Code, 2016 California Plumbing Code, 2016 California Mechanical Code, and 2016 California Green Standards Code as adopted and amended by the State of California and the City of Chula Vista. Landscape Architecture Division 16. Prior to issuance of the first Building Permit for the Project, the Applicant shall obtain approval of a "Landscape Documentation Package" that complies with the City's Landscape Water Conservation Ordinance, Municipal Code Chapter 20.12. 17. The addition of 23 multi-family units generates parkland obligations and is subject to Parkland Acquisition and Development (PAD). The Applicant shall pay PAD fees prior to issuance of the first Building Permit, or if deferred,prior to final building inspection at the rate in effect at that time. Land Development Division 18. The Applicant shall enter into a Storm Water Maintenance Agreement with the City prior to issuance of the first Building Permit for the Project. 19. The Applicant shall implement the soil recommendations provided within the Phase II Site Investigation Report prepared for the Project parcel dated May 23, 2017 by Environmental Navigation Services, Inc. 20. The following fees may be adjusted based on the final Building Plans submitted a. Sewer Connection and Capacity Fees i b, Traffic Signal Fees c. Public Facilities Development Impact Fees (PFDIF) d. Western Transportation Development Impact Fees (WTDIF) e, Other Engineering Fees as applicable per the Master Fee Schedule. 21. Additional deposits or fees in accordance with the City Subdivision Manual, and Master Fee Schedule will be required for the submittal of the following items: a. Grading Plans b. Street Improvement Plans c. Construction Permit PC Resolution DRI 7-0039 June 13,2018 Page 5 22. The Applicant shall obtain a Land Development Permit prior to beginning any earthwork activities at the Project Site and before issuance of Building Permits in accordance with Chula Vista Municipal Code Title 15.04. The Applicant shall submit Grading Plans in conformance with the City's Subdivision Manual and the City's Development Storm Water Manual requirements,including, but not limited to the following: a. Grading Plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer,or designee. b. Drainage Study and Geotechnical/Soils Investigations are required with the first submittal of Grading Plans. The Drainage Study shall calculate the Pre- Development and Post-Development flows and show how downstream properties and storm drain facilities are impacted. Design shall incorporate detention of storm water runoff if Post-Development flows exceed Pre-Development flows; analysis shall include flows from 2 yr, 10 yr, and 50 yr return frequency storms. c. The Drainage Study shall also demonstrate that no property damage will occur during the 140-year storm event. 3 d. The Drainage Study shall show any offsite flows. e. All onsite drainage facilities shall be private. s f. Any offsite work will require Letters of Permission from the affected property owner(s). 23. On May 2013, the California Regional Water Quality Control Board for the San Diego Region (SDRWQCB) reissued a municipal storm water, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit (Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems Order No. R9- 2013-0001 and as amended by Order Nos R9-2015-0001 & R9-2015-4140 (MS4 Permit) that covered its region. The Project shall comply with all requirements of the MS4 Permit and City of Chula Vista Best Management Practices (.BMP) Design Manual, December 2015 and as amended (BMP Design Manual) for both construction and post- construction phases of the project, Prior to issuance of a Land Development Permit, documentation shall be provided, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, to demonstrate j such compliance. A copy of the BMP Design Manual is available on the City of Chula j Vista website at: h ://www.chufavistaca, ov/de artmentsl ublie-worksiservices/storm- water-pollution-prevention/documents-and-reports. 24. The Applicant she complete and submit the Storm Water Requirements Applicability Checklist (Intake Form) for All Permit Applications (see Appendix A.1 of the BMP Design Manual) with any Planning Application request, 25. The Applicant shall submit a detailed Operation & Maintenance (O&M) plan for all permanent BMPs as required by the City Engineer to preserve the intended pollution control and/or flow control performance of the BMP. Upon completion of construction of BMPs/Project, the Applicant shall update/finalize the O&M Plan to reflect constructed structural BMPs with as-built plans and baseline photos. 25. The Applicant shall provide a street easement dedication for all right of way that does not align with the existing property line. Street dedication easements shall be reviewed by PC Resolution DR17-0039 June 13,2018 Page 6 City staff and recorded through a separate instrument prior to the issuance of the first Building Permit. 27. Prior to obtaining any Building Permit for the Project, if the Project's total on-site improvements exceed an Engineering Threshold of (currently; $57,653.00, per Chula Vista Municipal Code Section 12.24.030, thea the Applicant shall be required to obtain a Construction Permit from the Land Development Section of the Department of Development Services. (The On-Site Improvements trigger for installation of Public Improvements is adjusted on an annual basis on July 1 based on the Engineer Construction Cost Index, See Attachment). A Construction Permit is required to perform the following work in the City's right-of-way, which may include, but is not limited to: (For Commercial, Industrial and Multifamily Residential, the following applies; 1. Limits the cost of reconstructing existing street improvements to meet current standards to 25%of the building permit valuation, 2. Requires Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA)pedestrian improvements in the right of way, if any are lacking or substandard. The required ADA improvements would.be limited to 20%of the building permit valuation.) a) Removal and replacement of any broken or damaged curb, gutter, and sidewalk per SDRSD G-2, and G-7 along the project's frontage to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Sidewalk shall be designed and constructed with proper transitions to existing conditions. j b) Removal of the existing driveways along Third Avenue and E Street and replacement of sidewalks meeting design standards as shown in Chula Vista Construction Standard CVCS-1. Dedication of public right of way as needed in order for driveway i to comply with American Disability Act(ADA)requirements. s c) All proposed sidewalks, walkways, pedestrian ramps, and disabled parking shall be designed to meet the City of Chula Vista Design Standards, ADA Standards, and Title 24 standards, as applicable. i d) Utilities Trenching and Restoration per CVCS-3 &4. 28. Separate permits for other public utilities (gas, electric, water, cable, telephone) shall be required, as necessary. 29. Any improvements in the public right-of-way beyond the project limits shall be designed and constructed as to not interfere with adjacent businesses, as approved by the City Engineer. 30. The construction and completion of all improvements and release requirements shall be secured in accordance with Section 18.16.180 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code. PC Resolution DR]7-0039 June 13,2018 Page 7 31. The Public Works Operations Section will have the right to inspect any existing sewer laterals and connections that are to be used by the Project. The Applicant agrees to replace laterals and connections that may need replacement as a result of this inspection. 32. The onsite sewer and storm drain system shall be private. All sewer laterals and storm drains shall be privately maintained from each building unit to the City-maintained public facilities. Fire Department 33. This project shall provide a fire flow of 2500 gallons per minute for at 2-hour duration at 20 p.s.i. 34, Based upon the required fire flow for mixed construction type(s), the Applicant shall provide a minimum of 3 fire hydrant(s) to serve this Project. 2 existing and 1 new public fire hydrant as stated in the condition below (05). 35.Where a portion of the building is more than 400 feet from a fire hydrant on a fire apparatus access road, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building, on site fire hydrants and mains shall be provided. At least one new public hydrant will need to be placed on the SE comer of Third and E Street to meet this requirement. The existing fire hydrants on E Street cannot be counted as they are across a four-lane road. II. The following on-going conditions shall apply to the Project Site as long as it relies on this approval: i 35. The Project Site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans, which include Site Plans, Floor Plans, and Elevation Plans on file in the Planning Division,the Conditions contained herein, the Urban Core Specific Plan, and Title 19.. i 37, The Applicant shall install all landscaping and hardscape improvements in accordance I with the approved Landscape Plan. 38.Approval of the Design Review Permit shall not waive compliance with any applicable sections of Title 19 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code,nor any other applicable laws and regulations in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 39. The Property Owner and Applicant shall and do agree to indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless City, its City Council members, Planning Commission members, officers, employees and representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands, claims and costs, including court costs and attorney's fees (collectively, liabilities)incurred by the City arising, directly or indirectly, from(a) City's approval and issuance of this Design Review Permit, (b) any CEQA causes of action and (c) City's approval or issuance of any other permit or action, whether discretionary or non- discretionary, in connection with the use contemplated on the Project Site. The Property PC Resolution DRI 7-0039 June 13,2018 Page 8 Owner and Applicant shall acknowledge their agreement to this provision by executing a copy of this Design Review Permit where indicated below, The Property Owner's and Applicant's compliance with this provision shall be binding on any and all of the Property Owner's and Applicant's successors and assigns. 40. This Design Review Permit shall become void and ineffective if not utilized within three years from the effective date thereof, in accordance with Section 19.14.600 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code. III. GOVERNMENT COBE SECTION 660ZO(d)(1) NOTICE Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the 90-day period to protest the imposition of any impact fee, dedication, reservation, or other exaction described in this resolution begins on the effective date of this resolution and any such protest must be in a manner that complies with Section 66020(a) and failure to timely follow this procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void or annul imposition. The right to protest the fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions does not apply to planning, zoning, grading, or other similar application processing fees or service fees in connection 3 with this project; and it does not apply to any fees, dedication, reservations, or other exactions which have been given notice similar to this, nor does it revive challenges to any fees for which the statute of limitations has previously expired. IV. EXECUTION OF RESOLUTION OF APPROVAL The Property Owner and Applicant shall execute this document signing on the lines provided below, indicating that the Property Owner and Applicant have each read, understood and agreed to the conditions contained herein, and will implement same. j Upon execution, this document shall be signed and returned to the City's Development Services Department. Signature of Property Owner Date I Printed Name of Property Owner I Signature of Applicant Date Printed Name of Applicant PC Resolution DR 17-0039 June 13,2018 Page 9 V. CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE OF CONDITIONS If any of the foregoing conditions fail to occur, or if they are, by their terms, to be implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to revoke or modify all approvals herein granted, deny, or further condition issuance of all future building permits, deny, revoke, or further condition all certificates of occupancy issued under the authority of approvals herein granted, institute and prosecute litigation to compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation, .Failure to satisfy the conditions of this permit may also result in the imposition of civil or criminal penalties. VI. INVALIDITY; AUTOMATIC REVOCATION It is the intention of the Planning Commission that its adoption of this Resolution is dependent upon the enforceability of each and every term, provision and condition herein 4 stated; and that in the event that any one or more terms, provisions or conditions are determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, this N resolution and the permit shall be deemed to be automatically revoked and of no further force and effect. F Y Presented by: Approved as to form by: I i Kelly Broughton Glen R. Googins Director of Development Services City Attorney i , j 3 PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, this 13th day of June 2018,by the following vote, to-wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Gabe Gutierrez, Chair ATTEST: Patricia Laughlin, Secretary REQUEST TO SPEA1� � q CHULA.VISTA. ING COMMISSION y 1 DATE: = - Wish to speak: StZupport ecommendation: Public Comments C 'es OR - El leo ❑ Oppose Agenda Item, CITE.'OF SIDENCE`: NAE: - � REPRESENTING: °✓ TMC� r- ADDRESS(Optional;to be used for staff contact purposes only): TELEPHONE(Optional; to be used for staff contact purposes only): ADDITIONAL COMYMNTS: Please give this request to theBoard Secretary, ***The Chair will indicate the amount of time allotted for speaking. Thankyou for participating in this meeting # Please see reverse for additional information: }-PPL 1�- , REQUEST TO SPEAK CHU AVISTA PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: �l Wish to speak.: Staff Recommendation: Public Comments Yes Support OR -� ❑ No ❑ Oppose Agenda Iters r CITY OF RESIDENCE: REPRESENTING: ADDRESS(Optional;to be used for staff contact purposes only); TELEPHONE (Optional; to be used far.staff contact purposes only): ADDITIONAL COTNW LENTS: Please give this request to the Board Secretary. ***The Chair will indicate the amount of time allotted for spealkng. '# Thank you for participating in this meeting + Please see reverse for additional information REQUEST TO SPEAK CI ULA VISTA PLANNING- COMMISSION DATE: NJ Wish to speak: Staff Recommendation: Public Comments Yes ❑ Support OR. ❑ 10 Oppose Agenda Item CITY OF RESIDENCE: I'r3"ATME: ! ►' REPRESENTING: zfZ2,2 ADDRESS(Optional;to be used for staff contact purposes only): TELEPHONE(Optional; to be used for staff contact purposes only): ADDITIONAL COTVEMENTS: Please ve'this request to the Board Secretary. ***The Chair will indicate the amount of time allotted for speaking. Thank you for participatinu in this meeting ♦ Please see reverse for additional information w REQUEST TO SPEAK CHULA VISTA PLANNING CONMISSION DATE: Wish to speak: Staff Recommendation: Public Comments es � upport OR ❑ No ❑ Oppose Agenda Itean CITY OF RESIDENCE: NA1IE: REPRESEE'�'lT�' G: �� yJll '1 .ADDRESS(Optional;to be used for staff lontactpurposes only): TELEPHONE (Optional; to be used for staff contact purposes only): ADDITIONAL COT—VLMENTS: Please give this request to the Board Secretary. ***The Chair will indicate the amount of time allotted for spearing. Thank you for participating in this meeting + Please see reverse for additional information REQUEST TO SPEAK CHUI A VISTA.PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: Nish to speak: Staff Recommendation: Public Comments Yes Support OR ❑ No ® Oppose A-enda Item CITY OF RESIDENCE: k ,Dy-)d ANME: c E'l�i REPRESENTING: ADDRESS(Optional;to be used for staff contact purposes only): TELEPHONE (Optional; to be used for,staff contact purposes only): [ ��} ( A.DDIIIONAL'COi4TVIENTS: Please dive this request to the Board Secretary. ***The Chair will indicate the amount of time allotted for speaking. '# Thank you for participating in this meeting ,♦ Please see reverse for additional information REQUEST TO SPEAK CHULA VISTA. PLANNING COMMISSION �1Q�n - DATE: Wish to speak: Staff Recommendation: Public Comments Y es 4� y Support OR �.� 7 No ❑ Oppose A-enda Item r CITY OF RESIDENCE: NAME: m� REPRESENTING: ., ,,e� -t, 4en,14k ADDRESS(Optional;to be used for staff contact purposes only): ( ( TELEPHONE (Optional; to be used for staff contact purposes only): .DDITIONAL COiVlMENTS: Please give this request to the Board Secretary. ***The Chair will indicate the amount of time allotted for speaking. Thank you for participating in this meeting + Please see reverse for additional information REQUEST T(7► SPEAK CHULA.VISTA PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: Fish to speak: Staff Recommendation: Public Comments El Yes El Support OR .. —� C} filo ❑ Oppose Agenda Item U , ....... �° ? "' - ; V CITY OF SIDE?'�CE: / �r�r�zE� REPRESENTING: ADDRESS(Option ;to be used for staff contact purposes only): TELEPHONE(Optional;to be used for staff contact purposes only): ADDITIONAL CONT EME`3TS: Please give this request to the Board Secretary. ***The Chair will indicate the amount of time allotted for speaking. Thank you for participating in this meeting ♦ Please see reverse for additional information REQUEST TO SPEAK CHULA`VISTA PLANNING COMMISSION - _ DATE: r I Fish to speak...: Staff Recommendation: Public Comments Yes Support OR [I No El Oppose A6enda Item 4 CITY OF RESIDENCE: NATNIE: W46-4V R1F PRESENTING: .ADDRESS(Optional;to be used for staff contact purposes only): - � TELEPHONE (Optional; to be used for staff contact purposes only): ADDITIONAL COiVaIENTS Please give this request to the Board Secretary. ***The Chair will indicate the amount of time allotted for speaking. �# Thank you for participating in this meeting ♦ Please see reverse for additional information REQUEST TO SPEAK CHULA:VISTA PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: ? C Wish to speak: Staff Recommendation: Public Comments 6,Yes /�rfsupport OR CI No © Oppose Agenda Item 42 CITY OF RESLDENCE; c ' NATNI E: REPRESENTING: ADDRESS(Optional;to be used for staff contact purposes only): TELEPHONE (Optional; to be used for staff contact purposes only): ADDITTONAL CO�VLYI'ENTS: Please give this request to the Board Secretary. ***The Chair will indicate the amount of time allotted for speaking. Thank you for participating in this meeting ♦ Please see reverse for additional information REQUEST TO SPEAK CHLTLA NISTA PLANNING COMMISSION DA FE: — _ Wish to speak: Staff Recommendation: Public Comments --- _ 2(Yes C Support OR ❑ iso El Oppose Agenda Item r CITY OF RES FENCE: ` A t NAME: �� ��� REPRESEi4+T'I ISG: ADDRESS(Optional;to be used for staff contact purposes only): TELEPHONE, (Optional; to be used for staff contact purposes only); ADDITIONAL CO VD ENTS: Please give this request to the Board Secretary. ***The Chair will indicate the amount of time allotted for speaking. Thank you for participating in this meeting ♦ Please see reverse for additional information