HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 2018_04_24 5pmCity of Chula Vista
Staff Report
File#:18-0007, Item#: A.
PRESENTATION OF THE CLEAN CHAMPION AWARDS BY THE CHULA VISTA SUSTAINABILITY
COMMISSION
City of Chula Vista Printed on 4/19/2018Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 6
City of Chula Vista
Staff Report
File#:18-0168, Item#: B.
PRESENTATION OF A PROCLAMATION TO MIRELLA LOPEZ, FORMER EDITOR OF THE AWARD
-WINNING SOUTHWESTERN COLLEGE SUN NEWSPAPER AND EL SOL MAGAZINE, IN
RECOGNITION OF HER LEADERSHIP AS A STUDENT JOURNALIST
City of Chula Vista Printed on 4/19/2018Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 7
City of Chula Vista
Staff Report
File#:18-0173, Item#: C.
PRESENTATION OF A PROCLAMATION PROCLAIMING APRIL 2018 AS FAIR HOUSING MONTH
IN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
City of Chula Vista Printed on 4/19/2018Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 8
City of Chula Vista
Staff Report
File#:18-0169, Item#: 1.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES of December 12, 2017 at 5:00 p.m., December 19, 2017, and January 9,
2018.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Council approve the minutes.
City of Chula Vista Printed on 4/19/2018Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 9
City of Chula Vista
Meeting Minutes - Draft
5:00 PM Council Chambers
276 4th Avenue, Building A
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Tuesday, December 12, 2017
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CALL TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Chula Vista was called to order at 5:04 p.m. in the
Council Chambers, located in City Hall, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, California.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG AND MOMENT OF SILENCE
Deputy Mayor McCann led the Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL:
Present:Councilmember Aguilar, Councilmember Diaz, Deputy Mayor McCann and Mayor
Casillas Salas
Absent:Councilmember Padilla
Councilmember Aguilar arrived at 5:20 p.m.
Also Present: City Manager Halbert, City Attorney Googins, City Clerk Bigelow, and Deputy City Clerk
Larrarte
SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY
Mayor Casillas Salas recognized Boy Scout Troop 5.
A.17-0497 PRESENTATION OF QUARTERLY EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION
RECIPIENTS
Human Resources Director Chase recognized recipients of quarterly employee awards.
CONSENT CALENDAR (Items 1 - 2)
1.17-0544 APPROVAL OF MINUTES of September 12, 2017.
Recommended Action: Council approve the minutes.
Page 1City of Chula Vista
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 10
December 12, 2017City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft
2.17-0536 A. RESOLUTION NO. 2017-230 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING A MEMORANDUM OF
UNDERSTANDING (“MOU”) BETWEEN THE ASSOCIATION OF CHULA
VISTA EMPLOYEES RELATED TO COMPENSATION AND OTHER
TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT; AND AUTHORIZING THE
CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AFOREMENTIONED MOU AND
ANY ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS WHICH MAY BE NECESSARY OR
REQUIRED TO IMPLEMENT SAID MOU
B. RESOLUTION NO. 2017-231 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE AMENDED COMPENSATION
SUMMARY FOR UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEES INCLUDING
AUTHORIZATION FOR THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE ANY NECESSARY
DOCUMENTS TO IMPLEMENT SAID AMENDED COMPENSATION
SUMMARY
Recommended Action: Council adopt the resolutions.
Approval of the Consent Calendar
A motion was made by Deputy Mayor McCann, seconded by Councilmember
Diaz, to approve staff's recommendations on the above Consent Calendar items,
headings read, text waived. The motion carried by the following vote:
ACTION:
Yes:Diaz, McCann and Casillas Salas3 -
No:0
Abstain:0
PUBLIC COMMENTS
William Perno expressed gratitude for offering the recent Active Shooter Preparedness Training.
ACTION ITEMS
3.17-0535 A. RESOLUTION NO. 2017-232 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING THE COMPENSATION SCHEDULE AND
CLASSIFICATION PLAN TO REFLECT THE DELETION OF VARIOUS
POSITION TITLES AND AMENDING THE AUTHORIZED POSITION
COUNT IN THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT WITH NO NET
CHANGE IN AUTHORIZED STAFFING
B. RESOLUTION NO. 2017-233 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE REVISED FISCAL YEAR
2017-2018 COMPENSATION SCHEDULE EFFECTIVE SEPTEMBER
29, 2017, AS REQUIRED BY CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS,
TITLE 2, SECTION 570.5 TO REFLECT THE ADDITION OF SALARY
RANGE MINIMUM (STEP A) FOR THE CITY CLERK CLASSIFICATION
Page 2City of Chula Vista
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 11
December 12, 2017City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft
C. RESOLUTION NO. 2017-234 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE REVISED FISCAL YEAR
2017-2018 COMPENSATION SCHEDULE EFFECTIVE DECEMBER 22,
2017, AS REQUIRED BY CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, TITLE
2, SECTION 570.5 TO REFLECT: (1) THE SALARY RANGE
ADJUSTMENTS FOR RECREATION AIDE, CLERICAL AIDE AND
LIBRARY AIDE; (2) THE ELIMINATION OF TWO INACTIVE,
UNCLASSIFIED HOURLY POSITION TITLES, SCHOOL CROSSING
GUARD AND MUSEUM ATTENDANT; (3) THE NEGOTIATED SALARY
ADJUSTMENTS FOR POSITIONS REPRESENTED BY THE
ASSOCIATION OF CHULA VISTA EMPLOYEES (ACE); AND (4) THE
SALARY ADJUSTMENTS FOR EMPLOYEES IN THE CONFIDENTIAL
GROUP AND UNREPRESENTED, HOURLY EMPLOYEES WITH AN
ACE-REPRESENTED OR CONFIDENTIAL COUNTERPART
D. RESOLUTION NO. 2017-235 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE REVISED FISCAL YEAR
2017-2018 COMPENSATION SCHEDULE EFFECTIVE JANUARY 5,
2018, AS REQUIRED BY CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, TITLE
2, SECTION 570.5 TO REFLECT THE NEGOTIATED SALARY
ADJUSTMENTS FOR POSITIONS REPRESENTED BY THE
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIRE FIGHTERS, LOCAL 2180
(IAFF) AND UNCLASSIFIED HOURLY EMPLOYEES IN POSITIONS
WITH AN IAFF-REPRESENTED COUNTERPART
E. RESOLUTION NO. 2017-236 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING LETTERS OF UNDERSTANDING
(INVOLVING THE CAFETERIA PLAN OPTIONAL CASH BENEFITS)
WITH THE CHULA VISTA MID-MANAGERS/PROFESSIONAL
ASSOCIATION/SEIU LOCAL 221 (MMPR/SEIU LOCAL 221) AND
WESTERN COUNCIL OF ENGINEERS (WCE)
Human Resources Director Chase spoke regarding the item.
A motion was made by Deputy Mayor McCann, seconded by Councilmember
Diaz, to adopt Resolution Nos. 2018-232 through 2018-236 headings read, text
waived. The motion carried by the following vote:
ACTION:
Yes:Diaz, McCann and Casillas Salas3 -
No:0
Abstain:0
CITY MANAGER’S REPORTS
There were none.
Page 3City of Chula Vista
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 12
December 12, 2017City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft
MAYOR’S REPORTS
At the request of Mayor Casillas Salas, there was consensus of the Council to add an item to the agenda
of December 19, 2017 to consider endorsement of the TEDx Chula Vista event, which would take place in
May 2018.
Mayor Casillas Salas announced that the San Diego Bike Coalition had awarded the City with a Golden
Gear Award for its bike-friendly efforts and she recognized Principal Civil Engineer Rivera for leading the
City's efforts.
Mayor Casillas Salas announced the recent retirements of Officer Smith and Sergeant McAvenia. She
reported on her attendance at the following recent events: opening of the teen drop-in center Safe Place, a
retirement celebration honoring Library Director Betty Waznis, the residential Veteran's Home holiday
party, and her announcement of the Coming Together Toy Drive on Channel 7 News.
COUNCILMEMBERS’ COMMENTS
Councilmember Diaz spoke regarding the importance of active shooter preparedness.
Deputy Mayor McCann thanked the Boy Scouts from Corpus Christi for their attendance at the meeting.
He reported on his attendance at the following recent events: League of California Cities meeting; the
retirements of Community Service Officer Jackson, Officer Smith, and Sergeant McAvenia; the Police
Department promotion ceremony; and the Veteran's Home holiday party. He also wished everyone a Merry
Christmas, Happy Hanukkah, and Happy New Year.
Councilmember Aguilar spoke regarding her recent tours of the KOA campground in Chula Vista and City
parks.
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS
City Attorney Googins announced that the Council would convene in closed session to discuss Items 4
and 6 listed below. He stated that Item 5 would be continued to a future date.
William Best spoke regarding Closed Session Item 6. He expressed concern regarding the terms of the
contract and spoke regarding the subject property.
Mayor Casillas Salas announced that the meeting would be adjourned in memory of Amy Partosan.
Mayor Casillas Salas recessed the meeting at 5:40 p.m. The Council reconvened in Closed Session at
5:45 p.m., with all members present except Councilmember Padilla.
Page 4City of Chula Vista
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 13
December 12, 2017City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft
CLOSED SESSION
Pursuant to Resolution No. 13706 and Council Policy No. 346-03, Official Minutes and records of
action taken during Closed Sessions are maintained by the City Attorney.
4.17-0541 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING EXISTING
LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9
(d)(1)
Names of cases:
(a) John Hess v. Dave Hanneman, et al, United States District Court, Case
No. 14cv2271CAB(JMA);
(b) Tommy LaNier v. City of Chula Vista, et al., San Diego Superior Court,
Case No. 37-2014-00019774-CU-DF-CTL;
(c) A to Z Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Chula Vista, San Diego Superior
Court, Case No. 37-2017-00031155-CU-CO-CTL; and
(d) Lori Tremaine v City of Chula Vista, et al., San Diego Superior Court,
Case No. 37-2015-00043237-CU-PO-CTL
Item 4a: No reportable action.
Item 4b: Reportable action pending finalization of settlement.
Item 4c: Reportable action pending finalization of settlement.
Item 4d: Reportable action pending finalization of settlement.
ACTION:
5.17-0542 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL--ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
Initiation of litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(4):
One [1 ] Case.
Item 5 was not discussed.
6.17-0549 CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PURSUANT
TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8
Property: 1095 Alpine Avenue, Chula Vista (APN 619-100-23)
Agency negotiators: Gary Halbert, Eric Crockett, Rick Ryals
Negotiating Parties: City of Chula Vista & William F. Best, property owner
Under Negotiation: Price and terms for acquisition
Reportable action pending finalization of agreement.ACTION:
Page 5City of Chula Vista
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 14
December 12, 2017City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft
ADJOURNMENT
At 6:00 p.m., Mayor Casillas Salas adjourned the meeting in memory of Amy Partosan to the special City
Council Workshop on December 12, 2017, at 6:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers.
_______________________________
Kerry K. Bigelow, MMC, City Clerk
Page 6City of Chula Vista
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 15
City of Chula Vista
Meeting Minutes - Draft
5:00 PM Council Chambers
276 4th Avenue, Building A
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Tuesday, December 19, 2017
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CALL TO ORDER
A Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Chula Vista was called to order at 5:04 p.m. in the
Council Chambers, located in City Hall, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, California.
ROLL CALL:
Present:Councilmember Aguilar, Councilmember Diaz, Deputy Mayor McCann, Councilmember
Padilla and Mayor Casillas Salas
Also Present: City Manager Halbert, Sr. Assistant City Attorney Miesfeld, City Clerk Bigelow, and Records
Manager Turner
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG AND MOMENT OF SILENCE
Councilmember Aguilar led the Pledge of Allegiance.
SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY
A.17-0550 PRESENTATION OF A PROCLAMATION COMMENDING BATTALION
CHIEF MIKE REEVES UPON 32 YEARS OF DEDICATED SERVICE
Mayor Casillas Salas read the proclamation and Councilmember Diaz presented it to Battalion Chief
Reeves.
CONSENT CALENDAR (Items 1 - 13)
Item 4 was removed from the Consent Calendar for separate consideration due to a potential
property-related conflict of interest. Item 9 was removed from the Consent Calendar by Councilmember
Diaz.
Sr. Assistant City Attorney Miesfeld announced that a revised Exhibit A for Item 13 had been distributed
to the Council and that action on the item would be with respect to the revised document.
1.17-0387 RESOLUTION 2017-237 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROPRIATING $200,000 FROM THE AVAILABLE
BALANCE OF THE SEWER FACILITY REPLACEMENT FUND TO THE
MAX FIELD PUMP STATION RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT (SW278)
FOR CONTRACT CHANGE ORDERS WITH JUST CONSTRUCTION,
INC.; RATIFYING CITY STAFF’S ACTION ON APPROVING CHANGE
ORDERS FOR THE PROJECT; AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY
ENGINEER TO EXPEND ALL AVAILABLE FUNDS IN THE PROJECT
(4/5 VOTE REQUIRED)
Recommended Action: Council adopt the resolution.
Page 1City of Chula Vista
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 16
December 19, 2017City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft
2.17-0491 RESOLUTION 2017-238 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA AMENDING COUNCIL POLICY NO. 841-01 (COMMUNITY
GARDENS POLICY), INCLUDING THE CONSIDERATION TO ALLOW
COMMUNITY GARDENS ON ALL CITY-OWNED LAND
Recommended Action: Council adopt the resolution.
3.17-0492 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING CHAPTER
8.22 OF THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE TO EXPAND SMOKING
PROHIBITIONS (FIRST READING)
Recommended Action: Council place the ordinance on first reading.
Item 4 was removed from the Consent Calendar.
5.17-0511 RESOLUTION 2017-242 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA ORDERING THE SUMMARY VACATION OF THE
IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF DEDICATION OF LOTS “F” AND “G” FOR
OPEN SPACE PURPOSES PER FINAL MAP NO. 15942, CHULA VISTA
TRACT NO. 09-03, OTAY RANCH MILLENIA (EASTERN URBAN
CENTER)
Recommended Action: Council adopt the resolution.
6.17-0494 RESOLUTION 2017-243 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA ADOPTING THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA CAFETERIA
BENEFITS PLAN FOR 2018
Recommended Action: Council adopt the resolution.
7.17-0518 RESOLUTION 2017-244 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE PURCHASE OF VARIOUS
NETWORKING HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE EQUIPMENT FROM NIC
PARTNERS UTILIZING NASPO VALUEPOINT CONTRACT AR-233
(14-19) PA# 7-14-70-04; AND APPROVING A PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH NIC PARTNERS UTILIZING
CALIFORNIA MULTIPLE AWARD SCHEDULE (CMAS) CONTRACT #
3-10-70-2473L FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Recommended Action: Council adopt the resolution.
8.17-0522 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING SECTION
2.04.020 OF THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE
TIME AND PLACE OF COUNCIL MEETINGS (FIRST READING)
Recommended Action: Council place the ordinance on first reading.
Item 9 was removed from the Consent Calendar.
Page 2City of Chula Vista
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 17
December 19, 2017City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft
10.17-0534 RESOLUTION 2017-246 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROPRIATING $33,000 IN UNANTICIPATED GRANT
REVENUE TO THE SUPPLIES AND SERVICES CATEGORY OF THE
ANIMAL CARE FACILITY’S “OTHER GRANT FUND” BUDGET (4/5 VOTE
REQUIRED)
Recommended Action: Council adopt the resolution.
11.17-0538 RESOLUTION 2017-247 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO A
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT WITH THE FEDERAL AVIATION
AUTHORITY, A PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF SAN
DIEGO AND AGREEMENTS WITH INDUSTRY PARTNERS IN SUPPORT
OF THE REGIONAL APPLICATION, BY THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO, TO
THE FEDERAL AVIATION AUTHORITY’S UNMANNED AERIAL
SYSTEMS INTEGRATION PILOT PROGRAM
Recommended Action: Council adopt the resolution.
12.17-0476 RESOLUTION 2017-248 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE PURCHASE OF A 0.20 ACRE
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1095 ALPINE AVENUE FOR PUBLIC
PURPOSES INCLUDING THE POTENTIAL CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW
FIRE STATION TO REPLACE EXISTING STATION 9 AND
APPROPRIATING FUNDS FROM THE GENERAL FUND RESERVE
THEREFOR (4/5 VOTE REQUIRED)
Recommended Action: Council adopt the resolution.
13.17-0402 RESOLUTION 2017-249 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA ACTING IN ITS CAPACITY AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY
OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 17-I (WESTERN CHULA
VISTA DIF FINANCING PROGRAM), DECLARING THE RESULTS OF A
SPECIAL ELECTION IN THAT TERRITORY DESIGNATED AS
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 17-I (WESTERN CHULA VISTA
DIF FINANCING PROGRAM), ANNEXATION NO. 2017-01 (URBANA),
AND ADDING SUCH TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT
Recommended Action: Council adopt the resolution.
Approval of the Consent Calendar
A motion was made by Deputy Mayor McCann, seconded by Councilmember
Aguilar, to approve staff's recommendations on the above Consent Calendar
items, headings read, text waived. The motion carried by the following vote:
ACTION:
Yes:Aguilar, Diaz, McCann, Padilla and Casillas Salas5 -
No:0
Abstain:0
Page 3City of Chula Vista
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 18
December 19, 2017City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft
ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR
4.17-0506 REPORT REGARDING DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES, THE
PARKLAND ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT FEE, AND TRUNK
SEWER CAPITAL RESERVE FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED
JUNE 30, 2017
A. RESOLUTION 2017-239 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA MAKING REQUISITE FINDINGS PURSUANT TO
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 66001(d) FOR DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT FEES COLLECTED AND REMAINING UNEXPENDED FOR
FIVE OR MORE YEARS (POGGI CANYON SEWER DEVELOPMENT
IMPACT FEE, OTAY RANCH VILLAGES 1, 2, 5, & 6 PEDESTRIAN
BRIDGE DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE, AND OTAY RANCH VILLAGE
11 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE)
B. RESOLUTION 2017-240 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA MAKING REQUISITE FINDINGS PURSUANT TO
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 66001(d) FOR DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT FEES COLLECTED AND REMAINING UNEXPENDED FOR
FIVE OR MORE YEARS (EASTERN TRANSPORTATION
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE)
C. RESOLUTION 2017-241 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA MAKING REQUISITE FINDINGS PURSUANT TO
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 66001(d) FOR DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT FEES COLLECTED AND REMAINING UNEXPENDED FOR
FIVE OR MORE YEARS (TELEGRAPH CANYON DRAINAGE
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE)
A motion was made by Deputy Mayor McCann, seconded by Mayor Casillas
Salas, to adopt Resolution No. 2017-239 (Item 4A), heading read, text waived. The
motion carried by the following vote:
ACTION:
Yes:Aguilar, Diaz, McCann, Padilla and Casillas Salas5 -
No:0
Abstain:0
Sr. Assistant City Attorney Miesfeld stated that Mayor Casillas Salas, Deputy Mayor McCann,
Councilmembers Aguilar, and Padilla each had a potential property-related conflict of interest on Item 4B
and that two councilmembers would be selected by random lot to participate in voting on the item.
Deputy Mayor McCann and Councilmember Padilla were selected by random lot by Records Manager
Turner to participate in voting on Item 4B.
Councilmember Aguilar and Mayor Casillas Salas left the dais during the voting on Item 4B.
.
Page 4City of Chula Vista
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 19
December 19, 2017City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft
A motion was made by Councilmember Padilla, seconded by Councilmember
Diaz, to adopt Resolution No. 2017-240 (Item 4B) heading read, text waived. The
motion carried by the following vote:
ACTION:
Yes:Diaz, McCann and Padilla3 -
No:0
Abstain:Aguilar and Casillas Salas2 -
Mayor Casillas Salas, Deputy Mayor McCann, and Councilmember Aguilar each had a potential
property-related conflict of interest on Item 4C. Deputy Mayor McCann was selected by random lot by
Records Manager Turner to participate in voting on Item 4C.
Councilmember Aguilar and Mayor Casillas Salas left the dais during the voting on Item 4C.
A motion was made by Councilmember Padilla, seconded by Councilmember
Diaz, to adopt Resolution No. 2017-241 (Item 4C) heading read, text waived. The
motion carried by the following vote:
ACTION:
Yes:Diaz, McCann and Padilla3 -
No:0
Abstain:Aguilar and Casillas Salas2 -
9.17-0531 RESOLUTION 2017-245 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA AMENDING THE CITY-INITIATED TOW AND STORAGE
RATE SCHEDULE AND THE TOW LICENSE FEE
A motion was made by Deputy Mayor McCann, seconded by Mayor Salas, to
adopt Resolution No. 2017-245 heading read, text waived. The motion carried by
the following vote:
ACTION:
Yes:Aguilar, McCann, Padilla and Casillas Salas4 -
No:Diaz1 -
Abstain:0
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Kathleen Lippitt, Chula Vista resident, spoke in opposition to legalizing retail marijuana sales and
distributed written communication to the council.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
14.17-0510 PRESENTATION AND CONSIDERATION OF ACCEPTANCE OF THE
2 016/2017 CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL PERFORMANCE AND
EVALUATION REPORT (CAPER) AND SOLICITATION OF INPUT ON
FUNDING PRIORITIES FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK
GRANT (CDBG), HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIPS PROGRAM
(HOME), AND EMERGENCY SOLUTIONS GRANT (ESG) FOR THE
2018/2019 PROGRAM YEAR
Notice of the hearing was given in accordance with legal requirements, and the hearing was held on the
date and no earlier than the time specified in the notice.
Senior Management Analyst Davis gave a presentation on the item.
Page 5City of Chula Vista
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 20
December 19, 2017City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft
Mayor Casillas Salas opened the public hearing.
There being no members of the public who wished to speak, Mayor Casillas Salas closed the public
hearing.
A motion was made by Councilmember Padilla, seconded by Deputy Mayor
McCann, to accept the year-end report, heading read, text waived. The motion
carried by the following vote:
ACTION:
Yes:Aguilar, Diaz, McCann, Padilla and Casillas Salas5 -
No:0
Abstain:0
ACTION ITEMS
15.17-0521 PRESENTATION OF CITY OF CHULA VISTA PUBLIC SAFETY
STAFFING STRATEGIES REPORT INCLUDING REVENUE OPTIONS
AND PUBLIC OPINION SURVEY RESULTS
Deputy Fire Chief Muns, Police Captain Reber, and Finance Director Bilby gave a presentation on the
item.
Marketing and Communications Manager Steinberger introduced Dr. Tim McLarney of True North
Research, who gave a presentation on the research and feasibility study.
Darrell Roberts, representing Chula Vista International Association of Firefighters (IAFF) Local 2180,
thanked staff and the Public Safety Committee for their work on the study.
Lynnette Tessitore, representing Chula Vista Mid-Managers/Professionals, thanked staff for their work,
and spoke in support of developing long-term solutions that would not affect the general fund operations.
Manolo Guillen, Chula Vista resident and member of the Public Safety Advisory Committee, expressed
support for public safety.
Norma Cazares, Chula Vista resident, expressed support for public safety and a potential sales tax and
other funding measures.
Frank Rivera, representing Chula Vista Mid-Managers/Professionals, spoke in support of staff continuing
to work with the Public Safety Advisory Committee on strategies.
Laura Terry-Glimme, Chula Vista resident, thanked the first responders and spoke in support of public
safety funding.
David Oyos, representing Chula Vista Police Officers Association (POA), spoke in support of public
safety funding.
Mayor Casillas Salas spoke in support of staff investigating the feasibility of a potential tax measure
passing in the June election, and pursuing a tax measure, if feasible.
Councilmember Diaz spoke in support of Mayor Casillas Salas's comments. He expressed support for
proactive policing and additional funding needed for the program, as well as for economic development.
Councilmember Padilla spoke in support of accepting the report, moving forward with a sales tax measure
in June, if feasible, and continuing to consider other funding options.
Page 6City of Chula Vista
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 21
December 19, 2017City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft
Councilmember Aguilar spoke in support of Mayor Casillas Salas's comments and expressed concern
about a sales tax measure on the June ballot if there would also be a cannabis measure. She spoke in
support of looking at other options as well and considering the establishment of a community facilities
district (CFD).
Deputy Mayor McCann thanked the Public Safety Committee, staff, and public speakers. He spoke in
opposition to parcel taxes, but support of a long-term plan and keeping public safety a priority.
A motion was made by Mayor Casillas Salas, seconded by Councilmember Diaz,
to direct staff to provide the Council with additional information that would allow
the council to decide whether to include a half-cent sales tax measure on the
ballot, either in June or November, depending on the best probability for the
measure to pass; and to keep separate and apart discussion of other revenue
options.
ACTION:
Yes:Aguilar, Diaz, McCann, Padilla and Casillas Salas5 -
No:0
Abstain:0
16.17-0539 RESOLUTION NO. 2018-018 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING AN EXCLUSIVE NEGOTIATING
AGREEMENT WITH THE UNIVERSITY OF SAINT KATHERINE, A
PRIVATE NON-PROFIT UNIVERSITY, FOR A PROPOSED UNIVERSITY
DEVELOPMENT
This item was continued to the meeting of January 23, 2018.
CITY MANAGER’S REPORTS
City Manager Halbert congratulated the Housing team for receiving the High-Performing Team award from
HUD. He wished happy holidays to all.
MAYOR’S REPORTS
17.17-0530 APPOINTMENT OF DEPUTY MAYOR
A motion was made by Mayor Casillas Salas, seconded by Deputy Mayor
McCann, to appoint Councilmember Diaz to serve as Deputy Mayor. The motion
carried by the following vote:
ACTION:
Yes:Aguilar, Diaz, McCann, Padilla and Casillas Salas5 -
No:0
Abstain:0
18.17-0527 APPOINTMENT OF CITY COUNCILMEMBERS TO OUTSIDE
AGENCIES:
· Chula Vista Veterans Home Support Foundation - Member
· Chula Vista Veterans Home Support Foundation -
Alternate
· Interagency Water Task Force - Two (2) Members
· International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives
Page 7City of Chula Vista
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 22
December 19, 2017City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft
(ICLEI) - Environmental Lead
· International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives
(ICLEI) - Alternate
· League of California Cities, San Diego Division - Member
· League of California Cities, San Diego Division - Alternate
· Metropolitan Transit System Board of Directors (MTS) -
1st Member (Mayor)
· Metropolitan Transit System Board of Directors (MTS) -
2nd Member (City Council Member)
· Metropolitan Transit System Board of Directors (MTS) -
Alternate
· Metropolitan Wastewater Commission (Metro) - Member
· Metropolitan Wastewater Commission (Metro) - Alternate
· Otay Valley Regional Park (OVRP) Policy Committee -
Member
· Otay Valley Regional Park (OVRP) Policy Committee -
Alternate
· Otay Ranch Preserve Owner Manager (POM) Policy
Committee - Member
· Otay Ranch Preserve Owner Manager (POM) Policy
Committee - Alternate
· San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) Board
of Directors - Member
· San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) Board
of Directors - 1st Alternate
· San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) Board
of Directors - 2nd Alternate
· San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG)
Bayshore Bikeway Committee
· South County Economic Development Council (EDC) -
Member
· South County Economic Development Council (EDC) -
Alternate
· University Project Task Force with Southwestern College -
Two (2) Members
A motion was made by Mayor Casillas Salas, seconded by Councilmember
Padilla, to re-appoint members to the same seats and maintain the 2017
assignments; except that Deputy Mayor Diaz would be appointed to the newly
created 2nd member seat on the MTS Board and Councilmember Aguilar would
be the alternate on the MTS Board. The motion carried by the following vote:
ACTION:
Yes:Aguilar, Diaz, McCann, Padilla and Casillas Salas5 -
No:0
Abstain:0
Page 8City of Chula Vista
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 23
December 19, 2017City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft
19.17-0552 CONSIDERATION OF CITY ENDORSEMENT OF THE TEDX CHULA
VISTA EVENT SCHEDULED FOR MAY 19, 2018, WHICH WILL BE A
LOCALLY ORGANIZED PRESENTATION DESIGNED TO SHARE IDEAS
AND ENCOURAGE COMMUNITY CONVERSATION. THIS EVENT IS
BEING COORDINATED BY CHULA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
DISTRICT REPRESENTATIVES IN COLLABORATION WITH
SOUTHWESTERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT, CITY OF CHULA
VISTA, AND OTHER LOCAL AND REGIONAL AGENCIES, AND IS
EXPECTED TO BRING LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE, NATIONAL, AND
INTERNATIONAL RECOGNITION FOR THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
A motion was made by Deputy Mayor McCann, seconded by Councilmember
Padilla, to approve the item, heading read, text waived. The motion carried by
the following vote:
ACTION:
Yes:Aguilar, Diaz, McCann, Padilla and Casillas Salas5 -
No:0
Abstain:0
Mayor Casillas Salas congratulated the Chula Vista Police Foundation for their successful turkey giveaway
event; and she wished happy holidays to all.
COUNCILMEMBERS’ COMMENTS
Councilmembers expressed holiday greetings.
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS
Sr. Assistant City Attorney Miesfeld announced that Closed Session Item 20 would not be heard.
CLOSED SESSION
Pursuant to Resolution No. 13706 and Council Policy No. 346-03, Official Minutes and records of
action taken during Closed Sessions are maintained by the City Attorney.
20.17-0553 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
Initiation of litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(4):
One (1) Case.
This item was not discussed.
ADJOURNMENT
At 7:42 p.m., Mayor Casillas Salas adjourned the meeting to the next regular City Council meeting on
January 9, 2018, at 5:00 p.m, in the Council Chambers.
_______________________________
Kerry K. Bigelow, MMC, City Clerk
Page 9City of Chula Vista
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 24
City of Chula Vista
Meeting Minutes - Draft
5:00 PM Council Chambers
276 4th Avenue, Building A
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Tuesday, January 9, 2018
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CALL TO ORDER
A Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Chula Vista was called to order at 5:01 p.m. in the
Council Chambers, located in City Hall, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, California.
ROLL CALL:
Present:Councilmember Aguilar, Deputy Mayor Diaz, Councilmember McCann, Councilmember
Padilla and Mayor Casillas Salas
Also Present: City Manager Halbert, City Attorney Googins, City Clerk Bigelow, and Deputy City Clerk
Kansas
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG AND MOMENT OF SILENCE
Councilmember Padilla led the Pledge of Allegiance.
CONSENT CALENDAR (Items 1 - 5)
1.18-0010 APPROVAL OF MINUTES of September 19, 2017.
Recommended Action: Council approve the minutes.
2.18-0001 ORDINANCE NO. 3413 OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING
CHAPTER 8.22 OF THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE TO EXPAND
SMOKING PROHIBITIONS (SECOND READING AND ADOPTION)
Recommended Action: Council adopt the ordinance.
3.18-0002 ORDINANCE NO. 3414 OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING
SECTION 2.04.020 OF THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE
RELATING TO THE TIME AND PLACE OF COUNCIL MEETINGS
(SECOND READING AND ADOPTION)
Recommended Action: Council adopt the ordinance.
4.17-0503 ACCEPTANCE OF AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR FISCAL
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2017
RESOLUTION NO. 2018-001 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA MAKING AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR
2016/2017 BUDGET TO ADJUST FOR VARIANCES AND
APPROPRIATING FUNDS THEREFOR (4/5 VOTE REQUIRED)
Page 1City of Chula Vista
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 25
January 9, 2018City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft
Recommended Action: Council accept the report and adopt the resolution.
5.17-0540 RESOLUTION NO. 2018-002 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING A GRANT OF $5,000 FROM SAN DIEGO
GAS & ELECTRIC AND APPROPRIATING THE FUNDS TO THE
MUNICIPAL FACILITIES ENERGY EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENTS
SECTION OF THE OTHER GRANTS FUND FOR THE CIVIC CENTER
FAÇADE LED LIGHTING PROJECT (4/5 VOTE REQUIRED)
Recommended Action: Council adopt the resolution.
Approval of the Consent Calendar
A motion was made by Councilmember McCann, seconded by Deputy Mayor
Diaz, to approve staff's recommendations on the above Consent Calendar items,
headings read, text waived. The motion carried by the following vote:
ACTION:
Yes:Aguilar, Diaz, McCann, Padilla and Casillas Salas5 -
No:0
Abstain:0
ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR
There were none.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Barbara Gordon, San Diego resident, spoke in support of taking time to pass marijuana regulations.
Judi Strang, San Diego resident, spoke in support of allowing the petition to play out instead of adopting
marijuana regulations at that time.
Kathleen Lippitt, Poway resident, distributed written communication to the Council related to marijuana
manufacturing.
Jeremy Hutman, San Diego resident, spoke regarding the PACE financing program for energy efficiency
upgrades and provided a fact sheet to the council.
Kevin O'Neill, Chula Vista resident, expressed concern regarding the service provided by Republic
Services.
Page 2City of Chula Vista
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 26
January 9, 2018City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft
ACTION ITEMS
6.18-0005 SELECTION OF A DATE AND TIME FOR AN OPEN MEETING TO
CONDUCT INTERVIEWS OF ALL APPLICANTS WHO SUBMITTED A
QUALIFIED APPLICATION DURING THE SPECIFIED APPLICATION
PERIOD TO FILL ONE VACANCY ON THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT
OVERSIGHT COMMISSION (ENVIRONMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE)
(In accordance with Chula Vista Municipal Code section 2.53.040 (D),
since four or fewer qualified applications were received, all applicants will
be invited to interview.)
There was consensus of the Council to hold the interviews January 16, 2018, at 4:00 p.m.
CITY MANAGER’S REPORTS
City Manager Halbert spoke regarding Republic Services.
MAYOR’S REPORTS
Mayor Casillas Salas spoke regarding the final agreement for the Bayfront project, the
University/Innovation District, addressing chronic under staffing in the Police and Fire Departments, and
the recent Chula Vista Champions celebration. She also announced Law Enforcement Appreciation Day.
Mayor Casillas Salas reported on her recent attendance at a Chula Vista Brewery event, benefitting Mona
Scholarships for Young Women, and the Chula Vista Senior Club's New Year's Gala.
COUNCILMEMBERS’ COMMENTS
Councilmembers McCann and Padilla acknowledged National Law Enforcement Day.
Councilmember Aguilar stated she swore in the newest members of the Board of Directors for the Third
Avenue Village Association at their annual meeting. She announced the following upcoming events:
Taste of Third, Amps & Ales, Lemon Festival, and the Fall Pub Crawl.
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS
City Attorney Googins announced there would be no closed session items.
ADJOURNMENT
At 5:31 p.m., the meeting was adjourned to the Regular City Council Meeting on January 16, 2018, at 5:00
p.m., in the Council Chambers.
_______________________________
Sheree Kansas, Deputy City Clerk
Page 3City of Chula Vista
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 27
City of Chula Vista
Staff Report
File#:18-0164, Item#: 2.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
A. Memorandum from Councilmember Aguilar requesting an excused absence from the March
27, 2018 council meeting.
B. Letter of resignation from Steve Schoenerr, Historic Preservation Commission
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Council excuse the absence and accept the resignation.
City of Chula Vista Printed on 4/19/2018Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 28
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 29
1
Leah Larrarte
To:Rosemarie Rice
Subject:RE: resignation
From: Steve Schoenherr
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2018 1:36 PM
To: Rosemarie Rice
Subject: resignation
I am no longer able to attend these meetings, so I must resign my position on the Historic Preservation Commission.
Dr. Steven E. Schoenherr
Professor Emeritus of History
South Bay Historical Society
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 30
City of Chula Vista
Staff Report
File#:18-0165, Item#: 3.
A. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL
CODE, SECTION 19.58.022 (ACCESSORY SECOND DWELLING UNITS); CHAPTER 19.04
(DEFINITIONS); CHAPTER 19.20 (AGRICULTURAL ZONE); CHAPTER 19.22
(RESIDENTIAL ESTATES ZONE); CHAPTER 19.24 (SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE ZONE);
CHAPTER 19.26 (ONE- AND TWO-FAMILY RESIDENCE ZONE); CHAPTER 19.28
(APARTMENT RESIDENTIAL ZONE); AND CHAPTER 19.48 (PLANNED COMMUNITY
ZONE) WITH REGARD TO ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS (SECOND READING AND
ADOPTION)
B. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE
CHAPTER 3.32 (RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION TAX) TO EXEMPT ACCESSORY
DWELLING UNITS AND JUNIOR ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS FROM THE
RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION TAX AND AMENDING CHAPTER 17.10 (PARKLANDS AND
PUBLIC FACILITIES) TO WAIVE ASSESSMENT OF PARKLAND ACQUISITION AND
DEVELOPMENT FEES FOR ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS AND JUNIOR ACCESSORY
DWELLING UNITS (SECOND READING AND ADOPTION)
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Council adopt the ordinances.
SUMMARY
The item is an amendment to various sections of the Chula Vista Municipal Code (CVMC), related to
Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs), to comply with state law and its stated intent. In January 2017, the
State of California enacted laws: Senate Bill 1069; Assembly Bill 2299; and Assembly Bill 2406, to
address the statewide affordable housing demand. Generally, the bills require a ministerial approval
process for ADUs and Junior Accessory Dwelling Units (JADUs) and other requirements described
later in this report. These laws went into effect on January 1, 2017, and, arguably, had the effect of
nullifying and voiding the City’s existing Accessory Second Dwelling Unit (ASDU) ordinance. In
January 2018, the state enacted two additional laws: Senate Bill 229; and Assembly Bill 494. These
bills further define provisions to allow ADUs on lots with a proposed or existing primary residence,
allowed limited or no parking requirement, and a limitation on utility connection requirements and
fees. Staff reviewed the City’s existing ASDU ordinance, which is still contained in the CVMC, and
prepared a draft amendment to incorporate the new requirements, and to be in compliance with state
law. Further, ADUs generally serve low- and moderate-income families, and the findings in
City of Chula Vista Printed on 4/19/2018Page 1 of 5
powered by Legistar™2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 31
File#:18-0165, Item#: 3.
law. Further, ADUs generally serve low- and moderate-income families, and the findings in
Government Code Section 65852.150(b) as amended by Senate Bill 1069 indicate that ADUs are an
essential component of California’s housing supply that should not be subject to excessive local
agency requirements, including fees. Therefore, Ordinance B would waive the Residential
Construction Tax (RCT) and Parkland Acquisition and Development (PAD) Fees for ADU building
permits.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Environmental Notice
The Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinance Amendments qualify for a Class 3 Categorical Exemption
pursuant to Section 15303 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures) of the California
Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines. In addition, the Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinance
Amendments qualify for an Exemption pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the California
Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines. The Fee Waiver Ordinance Amendment is not a
“Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State
Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is
required.
Environmental Determination
The City Council finds that the Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinance Amendments are exempt from
environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section
15303 - New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures and Section 15061(b)(3) because it can
be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant
effect on the environment. The City Council finds that the Fee Waiver Ordinance Amendment is not a
“Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State
Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3), no further environmental
review is required.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
The San Diego County Airport Land Use Commission reviewed Ordinance A and determined that it is
consistent with Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (APLUCP) (Attachment 4), and on November 8,
2017 the City of Chula Vista Planning Commission recommended adoption of Ordinance A to the City
Council (Attachment 2).
DISCUSSION
The state determined that a substantial statewide storage of affordable housing is prevalent. In 2016
state law established SB 1069; AB 2406; and AB 2299 that allows local governments to create an
ordinance to regulate ADUs and JADUs in single-family and multifamily zones, and replaced the term
“second unit” with “accessory dwelling unit.” The intent is to create opportunities for residential
property owners to build accessory dwelling units as affordable housing stock, and for jurisdictions to
allow such units through a ministerial process; in January 2017 these bills became effective. In
January 2018, the State enacted SB 229 and AB 494. These bills require jurisdictions to allow these
units in single family and multi-family zones with proposed or existing primary residences, limited
parking and utility connection requirements for ADUs. As a result, the City’s Accessory Second
Dwelling Unit (ASDU) ordinance is now null and void until the City adopts an ADU ordinance that
complies with state law. Listed below are the key Chula Vista ASDU ordinance amendments that will
City of Chula Vista Printed on 4/19/2018Page 2 of 5
powered by Legistar™2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 32
File#:18-0165, Item#: 3.
comply with state law:
• Changes the nomenclature from Accessory Second Dwelling Units to Accessory Dwelling
Units; and
• Allows ADUs on single-family and multi-family zoned lots developed with a proposed or an existing
single-family dwelling; and
• Eliminates the minimum lot size requirement; and
• Permits a maximum ADU unit size of 1,200 square feet; not exceeding 50 percent of the primary
dwelling, whichever is less; and
• Does not require garage replacement when a garage for the primary dwelling is converted to an
ADU; and
• Allows replacement parking in any configuration including tandem parking; and
• Does not require parking for ADUs if located within ½ mile of public transit; and
• Allows for existing detached garages in the rear yard to be converted to an ADU and maintain the
existing setback; and
• Requires ADUs above a detached garage to maintain a minimum five-foot rear and side yard
setback from property lines; and
• Permits attached ADUs subject to the same development standards for the primary dwelling; and
• Allows for ADUs to be subject to design standards; and
• Allows the City to require owner-occupancy; and
• Allows for JADUs to be located within the existing dwelling (i.e. converted bedroom) not exceeding
500 square feet, with no parking requirement.
Additionally, the following code sections are amended to include provisions for ADUs and JADUs:
Chapters 19.04 (Definitions), 19.20 (Agricultural Zone), 19.22 (Residential Estates Zone), 19.24
(Single-Family Residence Zone), 19.26 (One- and Two-Family Residence Zone), 19.28 (Apartment
Residential Zone), and 19.48 (Planned Community Zone) will be amended to include ADUs and
JADUs as accessory uses in the respective sections (Attachment 2).
In keeping with the findings and intent of the mentioned state legislation, namely, that ADUs
represent an essential component of California’s affordable housing stock; and that Chapters 3.32
(Residential Construction Tax) and 17.10 (Parklands and Public Facilities) originally allowed for
waivers of the respective tax and fees for projects serving low- and moderate-income families,
Ordinance B would amend Municipal Code Chapters 3.32 and 17.10 to allow for waiving the
respective tax and fees for all ADU and JADU permits.
Public Outreach
On April 6, 2017 staff presented the draft Ordinance A to the Development Services Citizen Oversight
Committee; following discussion and review, the Committee recommended adoption of Ordinance A.
ANALYSIS
Senate Bill 1069 established state law authorizing local jurisdictions to create an ordinance for:
·The provision of accessory dwelling units (ADUs) in single-family and multi-family residential
zones; and
·Replace the term “second unit” with “accessory dwelling unit”; and
·Provide optional parking standards for ADUs under specific circumstances; and
·Require ministerial approval to create existing space within a single-family dwelling or
City of Chula Vista Printed on 4/19/2018Page 3 of 5
powered by Legistar™2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 33
File#:18-0165, Item#: 3.
·Require ministerial approval to create existing space within a single-family dwelling or
accessory structure for ADUs; and
·Prohibit local agencies from requiring the installation of a new or separate utility connection
between the ADU and the utility, or requiring a connection or capacity fee as they are not to be
considered as a new residential use; and
·Various development standards.
Senate Bill 1069 also amended Government Code Section 65852.150 to include the finding that
ADUs offer lower cost housing to meet the needs of existing and future residents, and that they
represent an essential component of California’s housing supply. Part (b) indicates that it is the intent
of the state legislature that the provisions of a local agency ADU ordinance not be so arbitrary,
excessive, or burdensome so as to unreasonably restrict the ability of homeowners to create ADUs in
authorized zones.
Assembly Bill 2299 established state law authorizing local jurisdictions to create an ordinance for
similar provisions stated in SB 1069, and added a provision to reduce or eliminate parking
requirements.
Assembly Bill 2406 established State law for the provision of Junior Accessory Dwelling Units
(JADUs) within existing single-family residences. The provisions include:
·No parking requirement; and
·Limit the number of junior accessory dwelling units to one per single-family residential zoned
lot with an existing single-family residence; and
·An owner-occupancy requirement; and
·Various development standards.
In January 2018 Senate Bill 229 and Assembly Bill 494 established state law that provides for ADUs
to be located in single-family and multi-family zones with a proposed or existing primary residence,
and additional provisions that limit ADU parking requirements, specifically requiring one parking
space per bedroom or per unit, or eliminating parking requirements entirely.
SB 229 refined provisions previously established with SB 1069 and AB 2299 by allowing ADUs in
zones that allow a single-family or multifamily use with a proposed or existing single-family dwelling.
AB 494 also refined the previous bills and is similar to SB 229, but added flexible setback
requirements for existing garages, limited parking not to exceed a maximum of one space per ADU,
and further defined accessory structure.
State law does allow ADUs and JADUs as rentable units separate from the primary residence, but
the units cannot be sold separately. State law allows the City to require owner-occupancy for ADUs
and the proposed Ordinance A does make this a requirement along with the recordation of an
agreement with the County that stipulates the occupancy requirement.
CONCLUSION
The proposed ordinances, if adopted, will be consistent with state law and will encourage the
development of more ADUs and JADUs, thereby increasing the availability of affordable housing. If
Ordinance A is not adopted, the provisions outlined in State law will remain in effect. If Ordinance B
City of Chula Vista Printed on 4/19/2018Page 4 of 5
powered by Legistar™2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 34
File#:18-0165, Item#: 3.
Ordinance A is not adopted, the provisions outlined in State law will remain in effect. If Ordinance B
is not adopted, ADUs and JADUs will be assessed the Residential Construction Tax and Parkland
Acquisition and Development Fees with waivers being addressed by City Council on a case-by-case
basis.
DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT
Staff has reviewed the decision contemplated by this action and has determined that it is not site-
specific and consequently, the 500-foot rule found in California Code of Regulations Title 2, section
18702.2(a)(11), is not applicable to this decision for purposes of determining a disqualifying real
property-related financial conflict of interest under the Political Reform Act (Cal. Gov't Code § 87100,
et seq.). Staff is not independently aware, and has not been informed by any City Councilmember, of
any other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter.
LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS
The City’s Strategic Plan has five major goals: Operational Excellence, Economic Vitality, Healthy
Community, Strong and Secure Neighborhoods and a Connected Community. The Ordinances
support the Strong and Secure Neighborhoods goal as they seek to lower barriers to new affordable
housing development.
CURRENT YEAR FISCAL IMPACT
All staff costs associated with preparing the Ordinances is included in the adopted budget.
ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT
As a planning document, the adoption of Ordinance A will have no direct fiscal impact to the City.
However, as projects are implemented both a revenue stream and cost factors will be realized. As
implementation of Ordinance A occurs, additional information regarding specific fiscal impacts of
future individual projects will be evaluated.
Long-term implementation of Ordinance B will result in minor reductions in revenue to the Residential
Construction Tax and Parkland Acquisition and Development funds. Due to the low-impact nature of
ADUs relative to single- and multi-family dwellings, the fee amounts being waived do not represent a
significant anticipated reduction of revenue to the aforementioned funds.
ATTACHMENTS
None.
Staff Contact: Michael Walker, Senior Planner, DSD Advance Planning Division
City of Chula Vista Printed on 4/19/2018Page 5 of 5
powered by Legistar™2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 35
SECOND READING AND ADOPTION
ORDINANCE NO.________
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
AMENDING CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE,
SECTION 19.58.022 (ACCESSORY SECOND
DWELLING UNITS); CHAPTER 19.04 (DEFINITIONS);
CHAPTER 19.20 (AGRICULTURAL ZONE); CHAPTER
19.22 (RESIDENTIAL ESTATES ZONE); CHAPTER
19.24 (SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE ZONE);
CHAPTER 19.26 (ONE- AND TWO-FAMILY
RESIDENCE ZONE); CHAPTER 19.28 (APARTMENT
RESIDENTIAL ZONE); AND CHAPTER 19.48
(PLANNED COMMUNITY ZONE) WITH REGARD TO
ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS
WHEREAS, in January 2017, the State of California enacted the following laws:
Senate Bill 1069; Assembly Bill 2299; and Assembly Bill 2406; and in January 2018
Senate Bill 229; and Assembly Bill 494 to address the statewide affordable housing
demand requiring a ministerial approval process and limiting regulatory requirements for
Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) and Junior Accessory Dwelling Units (JADUs); and
WHEREAS, as a result of said recently enacted California Laws, the City’s current
Accessory Second Dwelling Unit (ASDU) Ordinance (Chula Vista Municipal Code
Section 19.58.022) became null and void; and
WHEREAS, staff reviewed the City’s ASDU Ordinance, and prepared a draft
amendment to incorporate the new requirements to be in compliance with State law; and
WHEREAS, the revisions to Title 19 “Planning and Zoning” of the Chula Vista
Municipal Code contained in this Ordinance address the required amendments; and
WHEREAS, staff presented the ADU Ordinance to the Development Services
Oversight Committee which recommended adoption of the Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, on November 8, 2017 the City of Chula Vista Planning Commission
held an advertised public hearing on the subject ADU Ordinance and voted 6-0-1-0 to
adopt Resolution No. MPA17-0008 and thereby recommended that the City Council
adopt the Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, The City Council reviewed the proposed activity for compliance with
the California Environmental Quality Act and hereby finds and determines that the
adoption of this Ordinance is exempt from environmental review under the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15303 - New Construction or
Conversion of Small Structures and Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines
because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in
question may have a significant effect on the environment; therefore, no further
environmental review is required; and
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 36
SECOND READING AND ADOPTION
WHEREAS, the City Council set the time and place for a hearing on the subject
Ordinance and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its
publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City at least ten days prior to the
hearing; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on said Ordinance
at a time and place as advertised in the Council Chambers located at 276 Fourth Avenue
and said hearing was therefore closed.
NOW THEREFORE the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby
ordain as follows:
Section I.
Section 19.58.022 Accessory Dwelling Units
9.58.022 Accessory dwelling units.
A. The purpose of this section is to provide regulations for the establishment of accessory
dwelling units in compliance, inter alia, with California Government Code Section
65852.2. Said units may be located in residential zone districts where adequate public
facilities and services are available. Accessory dwelling units are a potential source of
affordable housing and shall not be considered in any calculation of allowable density of
the lot upon which they are located, and shall also be deemed consistent with the General
Plan and zoning designation of the lot as provided. Accessory dwelling units shall not be
considered a separate dwelling unit for the purpose of subdividing the property into
individual condominium or lot ownership.
B. For the purposes of this section, the following words are defined:
“Above” as used in this section shall mean an accessory dwelling unit that is attached,
and built over a primary residence including an attached garage, or above a detached
garage or similar building in the rear yard.
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 37
SECOND READING AND ADOPTION
“Accessory dwelling unit” means an attached or a detached residential dwelling unit
which provides complete independent living facilities for one or more persons. It shall
include permanent provisions for living, sleeping, eating, cooking, and sanitation on the
same parcel as the single-family dwelling is situated. An accessory dwelling unit also
includes the following:
(A) An efficiency unit, as defined in Section 17958.1 of the Health and Safety Code.
(B) A manufactured home, as defined in Section 18007 of the Health and Safety Code.
“Attached” shall mean a wall, floor, or ceiling of an accessory dwelling unit is shared
with the primary residence on the property.
“Basement” shall mean the same as defined in CVMC 19.04.026.
“Behind” shall mean an accessory dwelling unit constructed either entirely between the
rear of the primary residence and the rear property line, or at the side of the primary
residence, and set back from the front plane of the primary residence at least 50 percent
of the distance between the front and back planes of the primary residence (Exhibit B.1).
“Buildable pad area” shall mean the level finish grade of the lot not including slopes
greater than 50 percent grade (Exhibit B.2).
“Detached” shall mean an accessory dwelling unit separated from the primary residence
as specified in subsection (C)(5)(e) of this section.
“Living area” shall mean the interior habitable area of a dwelling unit including
basements and attics, but does not include garages or any accessory structure.
“Primary residence” shall mean a proposed or existing single-family dwelling constructed
on a lot as the main permitted use by the zone on said parcel.
“Tandem parking” shall mean that two or more vehicles are parked on a driveway or in
any other location on the lot lined up behind one another.
C. Accessory dwelling units shall be subject to the following requirements and
development standards:
1. Zones. Accessory dwelling units may accompany a proposed or an existing primary
residence in single family zones, on multifamily zoned lots developed with a single-
family residence, or similarly zoned lots in the Planned Community (PC) zone.
Accessory dwelling units or junior accessory dwelling units are not permitted on lots
developed with condominiums, townhomes, apartments, or similar multifamily
developments. Construction of a primary residence can be in conjunction with the
construction of an accessory dwelling unit. Where a guesthouse or other similar
accessory living space exists, accessory dwelling units are not permitted. The conversion
of a guest house, other similar living areas, or other accessory structures into an accessory
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 38
SECOND READING AND ADOPTION
dwelling unit is permitted, provided the conversion meets the intent and property
development standards of this section, and all other applicable CVMC requirements.
Accessory dwelling units shall not be permitted on lots within a planned unit
development (PUD), unless an amendment to the PUD is approved and specific property
development standards are adopted for the construction of said dwelling units for lots
within the PUD.
2. Unit Size. The total floor space of an attached or detached accessory dwelling unit
shall not exceed 50 percent of the living area of the primary residence or 1,200 square
feet whichever is less. The original buildable pad area of a lot may be increased through
regrading and/or use of retaining walls or structures as allowed for a specific lot.
3. Unit Location. Accessory dwelling units are prohibited in the required front setback.
4. Height. An accessory dwelling unit, as measured from the ground, shall not exceed the
height limit for the primary residence in accordance with the underlying zone.
5. Development Standard Exceptions. Accessory dwelling units shall conform to the
underlying zoning and land use development requirements with regards to the setbacks
for primary residences with the following exceptions:
a. New detached single-story accessory dwelling units are allowed a setback of no less
than five feet from the side and rear lot lines.
b. For lots with up-slopes between the side or rear of the house, required yard setbacks
are measured from the toe of slope.
c. For lots with down-slopes between the side or rear of the house, required yard setbacks
shall be measured from the top of slope.
d. A detached accessory dwelling unit shall be located a minimum of 6 feet from a
primary residence.
e. No setback shall be required for an existing garage that is converted to an accessory
dwelling unit or to a portion of an accessory dwelling unit, and a setback of no less than
five feet from the side and rear lot lines shall be required for an accessory dwelling unit
that is constructed above a garage.
6. Lot Coverage. Other than conversions of other structures, new accessory dwelling
units and all other structures on the lot are limited to the maximum lot coverage permitted
according to the underlying zone. Other than conversions of other structures a new
detached accessory dwelling unit and all other detached accessory structures combined,
shall not occupy more than 30 percent of the required rear yard setback.
7. Parking. Parking for an accessory dwelling unit is not required in any of the following
instances:
i. The accessory dwelling unit is within one-half mile from public transit stop.
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 39
SECOND READING AND ADOPTION
ii. The accessory dwelling unit is within an architecturally and historically
significant historic district.
iii. The accessory dwelling unit is part of a proposed or existing primary residence or
an existing accessory structure.
iv. The accessory dwelling unit is in an area where on-street parking permits are
required, but not offered to the occupant of the accessory dwelling unit.
v. The accessory dwelling unit is located within one block of a car share area.
8. Accessory dwelling units not meeting any of the above requirements shall be subject to
the following access and parking regulations:
a. Parking. Parking requirements for accessory dwelling units shall not exceed one
parking space per unit or per bedroom, whichever is less. Parking spaces may be
provided in tandem on an existing driveway provided that access to the garage for the
primary residence is not obstructed. Off-street parking shall be permitted in setback areas
in locations or through tandem parking, unless specific findings are made that parking in
setback areas or tandem parking is not feasible based upon specific site or regional
topographical or fire and safety conditions.
b. The required parking space(s) shall be on the same lot as the accessory dwelling unit.
This parking is in addition to the parking requirements for the primary residence as
specified in CVMC 19.62.170.
c. Notwithstanding CVMC 19.62.190, when a garage, carport, or covered parking
structure is demolished in conjunction with the construction of an accessory dwelling
unit, or is converted to an accessory dwelling unit that was previously used by the
primary residence, replacement parking shall be provided prior to, or concurrently with,
the conversion of the garage into the accessory dwelling unit. The replacement parking
may be located in any configuration on the same lot as the accessory dwelling unit,
including, but not limited to, covered spaces, uncovered spaces, tandem spaces, or by the
use of mechanical automobile parking lifts. If the existing driveway is no longer
necessary for the access to the converted garage or other required parking, said driveway
may be used to satisfy the required parking for the accessory dwelling unit when not
exempt from CVMC 19.58.022(C)(7).
d. Access to all required parking shall be from a public street, alley or a recorded access
easement. Access from a designated utility easement or similar condition shall not be
permitted. For any lot proposing an accessory dwelling unit and served by a panhandle or
easement access, the access must be a minimum 20 feet in width.
e. Curb cuts providing access from the public right-of-way to on-site parking spaces shall
be acceptable to the City Engineer. An encroachment permit from the City Engineer shall
be obtained for any new or widened curb cuts.
f. Required parking spaces or required maneuvering area shall be free of any utility poles,
support wires, guard rails, stand pipes or meters, and be in compliance with CVMC
19.62.150.
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 40
SECOND READING AND ADOPTION
g. When a required parking space abuts a fence or wall on either side, the space shall be a
minimum of 10 feet wide. If this area also serves as the pedestrian access from an
accessory dwelling unit to the street, the paving shall be a minimum 12 feet wide.
h. All required parking spaces shall be kept clear for parking purposes only.
9. Utilities. The accessory dwelling unit within a single-family residential zone that is
contained within the existing space of a single-family residence or accessory structure
and which has independent exterior access shall be served by the same water and sewer
lateral connections that serve the primary residence. A separate electric meter and address
may be provided for the accessory dwelling unit. Accessory dwelling units that are not
contained within the existing space of a single-family residence or accessory structure
shall be served by their own separate water and sewer lateral connections. Separate
electric meter and addresses shall be provided for the separate accessory dwelling units.
10. Design Standards. The lot shall retain a single-family appearance by incorporating
matching architectural design, building materials and colors of the primary residence with
the accessory dwelling unit, and any other accessory structure built concurrently with the
accessory dwelling unit. However, the primary residence may be modified to match the
new accessory dwelling unit. The accessory dwelling unit shall be subject to the
following development design standards:
a. Matching architectural design components shall be provided between the primary
residence, accessory dwelling unit, and any other accessory structures. These shall
include, but are not limited to:
i. Window and door type, style, design and treatment;
ii. Roof style, pitch, color, material and texture;
iii. Roof overhang and fascia size and width;
iv. Attic vents color and style;
v. Exterior finish colors, texture and materials.
b. A useable rear yard open space of a size at least equal to 50 percent of the required rear
yard area of the underlying zone shall be provided contiguous to the primary residence.
Access to this open space shall be directly from a common floor space area of the
primary residence such as living or dining rooms, kitchens or hallways, and without
obstruction or narrow walkways.
c. A useable open space that has a minimum dimension of six feet and an area not less
than 60 square feet in area shall be provided contiguous to an accessory dwelling unit. A
balcony or deck may satisfy this requirement for second story units.
d. Windows on second story accessory dwelling units should be staggered and oriented
away from adjacent residences closer than 10 feet. The location and orientation of
balconies or decks shall also be oriented away from adjacent neighbors’ backyard and
living space windows.
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 41
SECOND READING AND ADOPTION
e. Trash and recycling containers must be stored between pick-up dates in an on-site
location that is screened from public view and will not compromise any required open
space areas.
11. Designated Historical Sites. An accessory dwelling unit may be allowed on
designated or historical sites, provided the location and design of the accessory dwelling
unit meets corresponding historical preservation requirements in place at the time the
accessory dwelling unit is built, and complies with the requirements of this section
including the following:
a. The accessory dwelling unit shall be located behind a primary residence that is
determined to be a historic resource.
b. The construction of the accessory dwelling unit shall not result in the removal of any
other historically significant accessory structure, such as garages, outbuildings, stables or
other similar structures.
c. The accessory dwelling unit shall be designed as to have a distinguishable architectural
style and finished materials composition from the historic primary residence or structure.
d. Construction of an accessory dwelling unit shall not result in demolition, alteration or
movement of any historic structures and any other on-site features that convey the
historic significance of the structure and site.
e. If an historic house/site is under a Mills Act contract with the City, the contract shall be
amended to authorize the introduction of the accessory dwelling unit on the site.
12. Occupancy Requirement. At the time of building permit submittal, and continuously
thereafter, the property owner(s) shall reside on the lot on which the accessory dwelling
unit is located or constructed. The Zoning Administrator shall have the authority to
suspend this occupancy requirement for a period not to exceed five years when evidence
has been submitted that one of the following situations exists:
a. The property owners’ health requires them to temporarily live in an assisted living or
nursing facility.
b. The property owner is required to live outside the San Diego region as a condition of
employment or military service.
c. The property owner is required to live elsewhere to care for an immediate family
member.
d. The property owner has received the property as the result of the settlement of an
estate.
13. Land Use Agreement. Concurrent with the issuance of building permits for the
construction of an accessory dwelling unit, the property owner shall sign and notarize a
land use agreement which sets forth the occupancy and use limitations prescribed in this
section. This agreement will be recorded with the County of San Diego Recorder on title
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 42
SECOND READING AND ADOPTION
to the subject property. This agreement shall run with the land, and inure to the benefit of
the City of Chula Vista.
14. Accessory dwelling units shall not be required to provide fire sprinklers if they are
not required for the primary residence.
15. Recordation of a deed restriction is required, which shall run with the land, shall be
filed with the permitting agency, and shall include both of the following:
(a) A prohibition on the sale of the accessory dwelling unit separate from the sale of the
single-family residence, including a statement that the deed restriction may be enforced
against future purchasers.
(b) A restriction on the size and attributes of the accessory dwelling unit that conforms to
this section.
9.58.022(a) Junior Accessory Dwelling Units.
A. Definition: “Junior accessory dwelling unit” shall mean a unit that is no more than 500
square feet in size and contained entirely within an existing single-family structure. A
junior accessory dwelling unit may include separate sanitation facilities, or may share
sanitation facilities with the existing structure.
1) B. In single-family residential zones, a junior accessory dwelling unit is permitted
and shall meet all of the following: One junior accessory dwelling unit per residential lot
zoned for single-family residences with a single-family residence already built, and no
ADU or guest house exists on the lot.
2) Owner-occupancy is required in the single-family residence in which the junior
accessory dwelling unit will be permitted. The owner may reside in either the remaining
portion of the structure or the newly created junior accessory dwelling unit. Owner-
occupancy shall not be required if the owner is another governmental agency, land trust,
or housing organization.
3) Recordation of a deed restriction is required, shall run with the land, and shall be
filed with the permitting agency, and shall include both of the following:
(a) A prohibition on the sale of the junior accessory dwelling unit separate from
the sale of the single-family residence, including a statement that the deed restriction may
be enforced against future purchasers.
(b) A restriction on the size and attributes of the junior accessory dwelling unit
that conforms to this section.
4) A permitted junior accessory dwelling unit shall be constructed within the existing
walls of the structure, and require the inclusion of an existing bedroom.
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 43
SECOND READING AND ADOPTION
5) A separate entrance from the main entrance to the structure is required, with an
interior entry to the main living area. A permitted junior accessory dwelling may include
a second interior doorway for sound attenuation.
6) An efficiency kitchen for the junior accessory dwelling unit is required, and shall
include:
(a) A sink with a maximum waste line diameter of 1.5 inches.
(b) A cooking facility with appliances that do not require electrical service greater
than 120 volts or natural or propane gas.
(c) A food preparation counter and storage cabinets that are of reasonable size in
relation to the size of the junior accessory dwelling unit.
C. Additional parking is not required for a junior accessory dwelling unit.
D. For purposes of providing service for water, sewer, or power, including a connection
fee, a junior accessory dwelling unit shall not be considered a separate or new dwelling
unit.
Section II.
Chapter 19.04 DEFINITIONS
19.04.087 Dwelling, accessory dwelling unit.
19.04.087 Dwelling, accessory dwelling unit.
“Accessory dwelling units or junior accessory dwelling units” are independent living
facilities of limited size that provide permanent provisions for living, sleeping, eating,
cooking, and sanitation on the same parcel as a single-family dwelling. This includes
efficiency units and manufactured homes, in conformance with the requirements for such
units as defined in State Government Code Section 65852.2.
Section III.
Chapter 19.20 AGRICULTURAL ZONE
19.20.030 Accessory uses and buildings.
Accessory uses and buildings customarily incidental to any of the above uses permitted in
the agriculture zone, subject to the regulations for such as required herein, include:
I. Accessory dwelling units, subject to the provisions of CVMC 19.58.022.
Section IV.
Chapter 19.22 R-E – RESIDENTIAL ESTATES ZONE
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 44
SECOND READING AND ADOPTION
19.22.030 Accessory uses and buildings.
Accessory uses and buildings customarily incidental to any of the above uses shall be
permitted in the R-E zone subject to the regulations herein:
H. Accessory dwelling units,subject to the provisions of CVMC 19.58.022;
Section V.
Chapter 19.24 R-1 – SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE ZONE
19.24.030 Accessory uses and buildings.
Accessory uses permitted in the R-1 zone include:
K. Accessory dwelling units,subject to the provisions of CVMC 19.58.022;
Section VI.
Chapter 19.26 R-2 – ONE- AND TWO-FAMILY RESIDENCE ZONE
19.26.030 Accessory uses and buildings.
The following are the accessory uses permitted in an R-2 zone:
G. Accessory dwelling units on lots developed with a proposed or single-family dwelling,
subject to the provisions of CVMC 19.58.022;
Section VII.
Chapter 19.28 R-3 – APARTMENT RESIDENTIAL ZONE
19.28.030 Accessory uses and buildings.
Accessory uses and buildings in the R-3 zone include:
H. Accessory dwelling units on lots developed with a proposed or single-family dwelling,
subject to the provisions of CVMC 19.58.022.
Section VIII.
Chapter 19.48 P-C – PLANNED COMMUNITY ZONE
Sections:
19.48.145 P-C zone – Accessory dwelling units.
19.48.145 P-C zone – Accessory dwelling units.
Accessory dwelling units may be permitted within single-family residential areas within
the planned community zone subject to the provisions of CVMC 19.58.022 and the
provisions of the respective general development plans and sectional planning area plans
for each particular planned community.
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 45
SECOND READING AND ADOPTION
Section IX. Severability
If any portion of this Ordinance, or its application to any person or circumstance, is for
any reason held to be invalid, unenforceable or unconstitutional, by a court of competent
jurisdiction, that portion shall be deemed severable, and such invalidity, unenforceability
or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining
portions of the Ordinance, or its application to any other person or circumstance. The
City Council of the City of Chula Vista hereby declares that it would have adopted each
section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance, irrespective of the fact that any one
or more other sections, sentences, clauses or phrases of the Ordinance be declared
invalid, unenforceable or unconstitutional.
Section X. Construction
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista intends this Ordinance to supplement, not to
duplicate or contradict, applicable state and federal law and this Ordinance shall be
construed in light of that intent.
Section XI. Effective Date
This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force on the thirtieth day after its final
passage.
Section XII. Publication
The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and
shall cause the same to be published or posted according to law.
Presented by:Approved as to form by:
_____________________________________ ____________________________
Kelly G. Broughton, FASLA Glen R. Googins
Director of Developmental Services City Attorney
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 46
SECOND READING AND ADOPTION
C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@F40D2C27\@BCL@F40D2C27.docx
ORDINANCE NO.
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING
CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 3.32
(RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION TAX) TO EXEMPT
ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS AND JUNIOR ACCESSORY
DWELLING UNITS FROM THE RESIDENTIAL
CONSTRUCTION TAX AND AMENDING CHAPTER 17.10
(PARKLANDS AND PUBLIC FACILITIES) TO WAIVE
ASSESSMENT OF PARKLAND ACQUISITION AND
DEVELOPMENT FEES FOR ACCESSORY DWELLING
UNITS AND JUNIOR ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS
WHEREAS, Chula Vista Municipal Code (CVMC) Chapter 3.32 requires that all
residential development constructed in the City of Chula Vista be assessed a residential
construction tax (RCT) to generate revenue to offset the burden imposed upon the public
facilities and infrastructure of the City as a result of new residential development; and
WHEREAS, CVMC Section 3.32.050 provides for waiving the RCT for dwelling units in
the City that would serve as housing for low- and moderate-income families with the
recommendation of the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, CVMC Section 17.10.010 requires that new residential development
dedicate land and develop improvements for park and recreation purposes; and
WHEREAS, CVMC Section 17.10.070 allows for the payment of in-lieu Parkland
Acquisition and Development (PAD) fees for land dedication and park development
improvements; and
WHEREAS, CVMC Section 17.10.070 provides for waiving PAD Fees by resolution of
the City Council in the interests of stimulating the construction of housing for low- and
moderate-income families; and
WHEREAS, in January 2017, the State of California enacted Senate Bill 1069, Assembly
Bill 2299, and Assembly Bill 2406 to address the statewide affordable housing demand requiring
a ministerial approval process for Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) and Junior Accessory
Dwelling Units (JADUs); and
WHEREAS, in conjunction with this item, the City Council is considering an ordinance
that revises Title 19 “Planning and Zoning” of the CVMC to address amendments required by
Senate Bill 1069 and Assembly Bill 2299; and
WHEREAS, the findings in Government Code Section 65852.150(b) as amended by
Senate Bill 1069 indicate that ADUs are an essential component of California’s housing supply
and that the intent of the legislation is to ensure that fees among other local agency imposed
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 47
Ordinance
Page 2
requirements are not arbitrary, excessive, or burdensome to unreasonably restrict the ability of
homeowners to create ADUs in zones in which they are authorized; and
WHEREAS, waiving the RCT and PAD Fees assessed on building permits for ADUs and
JADUs is in accordance with the stated intent in Government Code Section 65852.150; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the proposed action for compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and hereby finds and determines that the action is
not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines; therefore,
pursuant to Section 15060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines the action is not subject to
CEQA. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City Council also hereby finds and determines that
the action qualifies for an Exemption pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA
Guidelines; therefore, no further environmental review is required.
NOW THEREFORE the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby ordain as
follows:
Section I.The following paragraph is hereby added to the end of Section 3.32.030
“Definitions.”, part “A”of the CVMC:
The term “dwelling unit” for the purposes of this chapter excludes “Accessory Dwelling
Units” or “Junior Accessory Dwelling Units” as defined in CVMC 19.58.022 and
19.58.022(a), respectively.
Section II.Section 3.32.050 “Waiver of tax requirements.” of the CVMC is hereby
replaced in its entirety with the following:
Resolution of City Council. The City Council may, by resolution, waive this tax for any
of the said dwelling-unit types listed hereinabove in this chapter to be constructed or
converted within the already developed and previously subdivided urban core of the city
or for any dwelling unit types constructed anywhere within the city that would serve as
housing for low- or moderate-income families.
Section III.The following part “C” is hereby added to the end of Section 17.10.070
“In-lieu fees for dedication and/or park development improvements.” of the CVMC:
C. Land Uses Exempt from In-Lieu Fees. “Accessory Dwelling Units” and “Junior
Accessory Dwelling Units” as defined in CVMC 19.58.022 and 19.58.022(a),
respectively, are exempt from payment of in-lieu fees for park land dedication and park
development as they offer lower cost housing supply to low- and moderate-income
families.
Section IV. Severability
If any portion of this Ordinance, or its application to any person or circumstance, is for
any reason held to be invalid, unenforceable or unconstitutional, by a court of competent
jurisdiction, that portion shall be deemed severable, and such invalidity, unenforceability or
unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining portions of the
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 48
Ordinance
Page 3
Ordinance, or its application to any other person or circumstance. The City Council of the City of
Chula Vista hereby declares that it would have adopted each section, sentence, clause or phrase
of this Ordinance, irrespective of the fact that any one or more other sections, sentences, clauses
or phrases of the Ordinance be declared invalid, unenforceable or unconstitutional.
Section V. Construction
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista intends this Ordinance to supplement, not to
duplicate or contradict, applicable state and federal law and this Ordinance shall be construed in
light of that intent.
Section VI. Effective Date
This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force on the thirtieth day after its final passage.
Section VII. Publication
The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause
the same to be published or posted according to law.
Presented by:Approved as to form by:
_____________________________________ ____________________________________
Kelly G. Broughton, FASLA Glen R. Googins
Director of Development Services City Attorney
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 49
City of Chula Vista
Staff Report
File#:18-0030, Item#: 4.
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING CHAPTER 15.26 OF THE CHULA VISTA
MUNICIPAL CODE TO INCREASE OUTDOOR LIGHTING EFFICIENCY FOR SPECIFIC
COMMERCIAL OUTDOOR LIGHTING APPLICATIONS (FIRST READING)
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Council place the ordinance on first reading.
SUMMARY
On September 26, 2017, the City Council adopted the 2017 Climate Action Plan (CAP), continuing
Chula Vista’s tradition as a nationally-recognized leader in addressing the local threat of climate
change by reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and lowering Chula Vista’s vulnerability to
expected climate change impacts. The 2017 CAP called for requiring energy efficiency upgrades.
The following proposed energy efficiency standards for specific commercial outdoor lighting
applications is a significant step in Chula Vista’s greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction strategy as
outlined in the 2017 CAP.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Environmental Notice
The activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality
Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental
review is required. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the activity qualifies for an Exemption pursuant to
Section 15061(b)(3) of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines.
Environmental Determination
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the CEQA Guidelines, and the
City’s environmental procedures, the City Council finds that the adoption of this ordinance is not a
“Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to
Section 15060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the activity is not subject to CEQA. In addition,
notwithstanding the foregoing, the City Council finds that the adoption of this ordinance covered by
CEQA General Rule Exemption [Section 15061(b)(3)] which exempts activities that can be seen with
certainty to have no possibility for causing a significant effect on the environment. A significant effect
is defined as, “a substantial, or potentially substantial, adverse change in the physical conditions
within the area,” and the adoption of this Ordinance is therefore not subject to CEQA. Thus, no
environmental review is required.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
City staff presented to the Development Services Citizen Oversight Committee on January 24, 2018
as an informational item. City Staff also presented to the Sustainability Commission (SSC) on
February 12, 2018. The SSC unanimously supported the proposed requirements. In addition, staff
presented to the Board of Appeals and Advisors on April 9, 2018 which recommended that City
City of Chula Vista Printed on 4/19/2018Page 1 of 8
powered by Legistar™2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 50
File#:18-0030, Item#: 4.
presented to the Board of Appeals and Advisors on April 9, 2018 which recommended that City
Council adopted the ordinance.
DISCUSSION
The 2017 Climate Action Plan (CAP) and related implementation actions were established through an
extensive outreach effort to Chula Vista residents and communities. In 2014, Staff reconvened the
previously formed Climate Change Working Group (CCWG). The CCWG was chaired by
Sustainability Commission members and consisted of 13 other members representing various
community sectors. The CCWG held a total of 11 meetings, including 10 publically-noticed meetings
and one public forum to solicit input and engage the public on the development of the greenhouse
gas reduction strategies through a consensus-building process. In November 2014, City Council
adopted the 12 GHG reduction strategies that the CCWG presented, which included requiring energy
savings retrofits.
These CCWG recommendations were subsequently incorporated into the 2017 (CAP) adopted by
the City Council in September 2017. The 2017 CAP included an implementation schedule that
identified requiring energy savings retrofits as an action that would start in the fourth quarter of 2017.
The proposed ordinance will leverage the City’s significant past efforts to increase energy efficiency
in commercial buildings such as implementing the Free Resource & Energy Business Evaluation
(FREBE) program, working with Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) financing companies and
the CLEAN Business program.
This proposed ordinance will be in place until it is superseded by the regular 2019 Building Energy
Efficiency Standards (slated to be implemented starting January 1, 2020) that are expected to require
similar, if not more stringent, power allowances for all outdoor lighting categories.
Task / Milestone Date
Present to City Council (first reading)April 24,
2018
City Council (second reading)May 1,
2018
Submit California Energy Commission
(CEC) Application
April 25,
2018
Receive CEC Response (expected)July 12,
2018
File with California Building
Standards Commission (expected)
July 13,
2018
Effective Date (30 days following CEC
approval)
August 12,
2018
This action is being taken in an effort to leverage the significant growth in LED efficiency and
continued drop in LED technology costs that has been seen in the market. This proposed ordinance
City of Chula Vista Printed on 4/19/2018Page 2 of 8
powered by Legistar™2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 51
File#:18-0030, Item#: 4.
continued drop in LED technology costs that has been seen in the market. This proposed ordinance
will also help better prepare Chula Vista businesses, builders and contractors for the anticipated
California State 2019 Building Energy Efficiency Standards.
Outdoor Lighting Zones:
California State lighting standards base the allowable outdoor lighting power, in part, on the
brightness of the surrounding conditions. Existing standards contain lighting power allowances based
on which Lighting Zone (LZ) the particular project is located in (see table below for description of all
lighting zones).
Zone Ambient
Illumination
State-wide Default Location
LZ1 Dark Government designated parks, recreation
areas and wildlife preserves.
LZ2 Low Rural areas
LZ3 Medium Urban areas
LZ4 High High intensity nighttime use, such as
entertainment or commercial districts or areas
with special security considerations requiring
very high light levels.
According to the State, different outdoor lighting zones are created because the eyes adapt to darker
surrounding conditions, resulting in less necessary light needed to properly see; when the
surrounding conditions get brighter, more light is needed to see.
The City of Chula Vista consists of three outdoor Lighting Zones per the attached Outdoor Lighting
Zones Map. These include:
·Lighting Zone 3, urban areas that are State default areas as adopted by the California Energy
Commission (CEC) and defined by the 2000 Census,
·Lighting Zone 2, rural areas that are State default areas as adopted by the CEC and defined
by the 2000 Census, and
·Lighting Zone 3, Urban areas as Amended by City of Chula Vista Ordinance # 3023.
The City’s most recent Lighting Zone Map adopted in 2005 lists a majority of the City as LZ3, but due
to significant development since it was adopted, City staff will be working to update the map and
bring back to City Council in the third quarter of 2018.
Proposed Implementation Approach:
In development of the proposed standards, the City utilized documents and analyses prepared for
future state energy codes and a model outdoor lighting efficiency ordinance that was created by the
four California Investor Owned Utilities (IOU) with feedback from local governments and other
stakeholders. Under this ordinance, non-residential new construction, additions or certain alterations
would need to meet lower power allowances for ten specific outdoor lighting uses (see table below).
City of Chula Vista Printed on 4/19/2018Page 3 of 8
powered by Legistar™2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 52
File#:18-0030, Item#: 4.
The new power allowances are calibrated to provide the same light output levels with less energy, by
utilizing Light Emitting Diode (LED) lighting products instead of Pulse Start Metal Halide (PSMH)
lighting which is an older and less efficient technology. A Codes and Standards Enhancement (CASE)
study performed in 2017 by California utilities found that LED products achieving these output and
efficiency levels were commercially available already and are cost effective alternatives to the older
PSMH technology.
The table below compares the existing power allowance alongside the proposed lower power
allowance. Each lighting application has a unique power allowance that is applied based on its
installation characteristics, such as being applied per application, per unit length, or per specific area,
see table below for how each power allowance is applied. The proposed ordinance amends power
allowances for ten specific outdoor lighting applications. In total, the California Energy Code sets
power allowances for 17 specific outdoor non-residential lighting applications. It is expected that all
17 power allowances for outdoor non-residential lighting applications will be reduced as part of the
regular 2019 Building Energy Efficiency Standards, slated to be implemented starting January 1,
2020. Therefore, this ordinance will help building owners save energy by putting some of the
expected 2019 requirements in place early.
Lighting Zone 1 Lighting Zone 2 Lighting Zone 3 Lighting Zone 4
Lighting
Application*
Existing
Value
(watts)
Proposed
Value (watts)
Existing
Value
(watts)
Propose
d Value
(watts)
Existing
Value
(watts)
Proposed
Value
(watts)
Existing
Value
(watts)
Proposed
Value
(watts)
WATTAGE ALLOWANCE PER APPLICATION.
Building
Entrances or
Exits.
Allowance per
door.
15 9 25 15 35 19 45 21
Primary
Entrances to
Senior Care
Facilities,
Police
Stations,
Hospitals,
Fire Stations,
and
Emergency
Vehicle
Facilities.
Allowance per
primary
entrance(s)
only. This
allowance shall
be in 'addition
to the building
entrance or exit
allowance
above.
45 20 80 40 120 57 130 60
Drive-Up
Windows.
Allowance per
customer
service
location.
40 16 75 30 125 50 200 75
WATTAGE ALLOWANCE PER UNIT LENGTH (w/linear ft).
Outdoor
Sales
Frontage.
Allowance for
frontage
immediately
adjacent to the
principal
viewing
location(s) and
unobstructed
for its viewing
length.
No
Allowance
No
Allowance
22.5 11 36 19 45 25
WATTAGE ALLOWANCE PER SPECIFIC AREA (W/ft²).
Building
Facades.Only
areas of
building façade
that are
illuminated
shall qualify for
this allowance.
No
Allowance
No
Allowance
0.18 0.100 0.35 0.170 0.50 0.225
Outdoor
Sales Lots.
Allowance for
uncovered
sales lots used
exclusively for
the display of
vehicles or
other
merchandise
for sale.
0.164 0.06 0.555 0.21 0.758 0.28 1.285 0.485
Vehicle
Service
Station
Hardscape.
Allowance for
the total
illuminated
hardscape area
less area of
buildings,
under
canopies, off
property, or
obstructed by
signs or
structures.
0.014 0.006 0.155 0.068 0.308 0.138 0.485 0.200
Vehicle
Service
Station
Canopies.
Allowance for the
total area within
the drip line of
the canopy.
0.514 0.220 1.005 0.430 1.300 0.580 2.200 1.010
Non-Sales
Canopies and
Tunnels.
Allowance for
the total area
within the drip
line of the
canopy or
inside the
tunnel.
0.084 0.057 0.205 0.137 0.408 0.27 0.585 0.37
Outdoor
Dining.
Allowance for
the total
illuminated
hardscape of
outdoor dining.
0.014 0.004 0.135 0.030 0.240 0.050 0.400 0.075
City of Chula Vista Printed on 4/19/2018Page 4 of 8
powered by Legistar™2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 53
File#:18-0030, Item#: 4.
Lighting Zone 1 Lighting Zone 2 Lighting Zone 3 Lighting Zone 4LightingApplication*ExistingValue(watts)ProposedValue (watts)ExistingValue(watts)Proposed Value(watts)ExistingValue(watts)ProposedValue(watts)ExistingValue(watts)ProposedValue(watts)WATTAGE ALLOWANCE PER APPLICATION.BuildingEntrances orExits.Allowance perdoor.15 9 25 15 35 19 45 21PrimaryEntrances toSenior CareFacilities,PoliceStations,Hospitals,Fire Stations,andEmergencyVehicleFacilities.Allowance perprimaryentrance(s)
only. This
allowance shall
be in 'addition
to the building
entrance or exit
allowance
above.
45 20 80 40 120 57 130 60
Drive-Up
Windows.
Allowance per
customer
service
location.
40 16 75 30 125 50 200 75
WATTAGE ALLOWANCE PER UNIT LENGTH (w/linear ft).
Outdoor
Sales
Frontage.
Allowance for
frontage
immediately
adjacent to the
principal
viewing
location(s) and
unobstructed
for its viewing
length.
No
Allowance
No
Allowance
22.5 11 36 19 45 25
WATTAGE ALLOWANCE PER SPECIFIC AREA (W/ft²).
Building
Facades.Only
areas of
building façade
that are
illuminated
shall qualify for
this allowance.
No
Allowance
No
Allowance
0.18 0.100 0.35 0.170 0.50 0.225
Outdoor
Sales Lots.
Allowance for
uncovered
sales lots used
exclusively for
the display of
vehicles or
other
merchandise
for sale.
0.164 0.06 0.555 0.21 0.758 0.28 1.285 0.485
Vehicle
Service
Station
Hardscape.
Allowance for
the total
illuminated
hardscape area
less area of
buildings,
under
canopies, off
property, or
obstructed by
signs or
structures.
0.014 0.006 0.155 0.068 0.308 0.138 0.485 0.200
Vehicle
Service
Station
Canopies.
Allowance for the
total area within
the drip line of
the canopy.
0.514 0.220 1.005 0.430 1.300 0.580 2.200 1.010
Non-Sales
Canopies and
Tunnels.
Allowance for
the total area
within the drip
line of the
canopy or
inside the
tunnel.
0.084 0.057 0.205 0.137 0.408 0.27 0.585 0.37
Outdoor
Dining.
Allowance for
the total
illuminated
hardscape of
outdoor dining.
0.014 0.004 0.135 0.030 0.240 0.050 0.400 0.075
City of Chula Vista Printed on 4/19/2018Page 5 of 8
powered by Legistar™2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 54
File#:18-0030, Item#: 4.
Lighting Zone 1 Lighting Zone 2 Lighting Zone 3 Lighting Zone 4LightingApplication*ExistingValue(watts)ProposedValue (watts)ExistingValue(watts)Proposed Value(watts)ExistingValue(watts)ProposedValue(watts)ExistingValue(watts)ProposedValue(watts)WATTAGE ALLOWANCE PER APPLICATION.BuildingEntrances orExits.Allowance perdoor.15 9 25 15 35 19 45 21PrimaryEntrances toSenior CareFacilities,PoliceStations,Hospitals,Fire Stations,andEmergencyVehicleFacilities.Allowance perprimaryentrance(s)only. Thisallowance shallbe in 'additionto the buildingentrance or exitallowanceabove.45 20 80 40 120 57 130 60Drive-UpWindows.Allowance percustomerservicelocation.40 16 75 30 125 50 200 75WATTAGE ALLOWANCE PER UNIT LENGTH (w/linear ft).OutdoorSalesFrontage.Allowance forfrontageimmediatelyadjacent to theprincipalviewinglocation(s) andunobstructedfor its viewinglength.NoAllowance NoAllowance 22.5 11 36 19 45 25WATTAGE ALLOWANCE PER SPECIFIC AREA (W/ft²).BuildingFacades.Onlyareas ofbuilding façadethat areilluminatedshall qualify forthis allowance.NoAllowance NoAllowance 0.18 0.100 0.35 0.170 0.50 0.225OutdoorSales Lots.Allowance foruncoveredsales lots usedexclusively forthe display ofvehicles orothermerchandisefor sale.0.164 0.06 0.555 0.21 0.758 0.28 1.285 0.485VehicleServiceStationHardscape.Allowance forthe totalilluminatedhardscape arealess area of
buildings,
under
canopies, off
property, or
obstructed by
signs or
structures.
0.014 0.006 0.155 0.068 0.308 0.138 0.485 0.200
Vehicle
Service
Station
Canopies.
Allowance for the
total area within
the drip line of
the canopy.
0.514 0.220 1.005 0.430 1.300 0.580 2.200 1.010
Non-Sales
Canopies and
Tunnels.
Allowance for
the total area
within the drip
line of the
canopy or
inside the
tunnel.
0.084 0.057 0.205 0.137 0.408 0.27 0.585 0.37
Outdoor
Dining.
Allowance for
the total
illuminated
hardscape of
outdoor dining.
0.014 0.004 0.135 0.030 0.240 0.050 0.400 0.075
* Lighting Zone 0 is not applicable in Chula Vista
Cost Effectiveness:
A proposed requirement is considered cost effective when it will save the user money over the
lifecycle of the measure in comparison with the existing requirement. Based on the findings in the
“Outdoor Lighting Power Allowances - Final Report”, (Attachment three) staff have determined this
ordinance to be cost-effective. This study was conducted in 2017 with the goal of studying LED
technology in the market in an effort to inform the states 2019 Building Energy Efficiency Standards
update.
The study shows that installing lighting systems compliant with the proposed allowances will save
businesses money under typical operating conditions. In other words, the energy bill savings will
more than compensate for any increase in initial installation cost. As shown in the table below, for
seven out of ten of the affected outdoor lighting categories, the new lighting technologies needed to
meet the proposed lighting power allowance standards were actually found to cost less to purchase
and install. Therefore, the proposed requirements for these seven categories have an infinite benefit-
to-cost ratio. The remaining three categories have an average benefit to cost ratio of 22.2, which
means that over their expected lifetime, they are expected to save the users much more in utility
costs than the incremental cost to implement the upgrades.
Outdoor
Lighting
Category
Additional
Installation
Cost
Lifecycle Energy
Bill Savings
Benefit to
Cost Ratio
Building
Entrances
Lower $173 per installed
fixture
Not applicable
Primary Entrances Lower $672 per installed
fixture
Not applicable
Drive Up
Windows
Lower $550 per installed
fixture
Not applicable
Outdoor Sales
Frontage
$11.17 per ft.$82 per ft.7.35
Building Facades $0.02 per sq.
ft.
$132 per sq. ft.51.4
Outdoor Sales
Lots
Lower $4.60 per sq. ft.Not applicable
Vehicle Service
Station Hardscape
$0.21 per sq.
ft.
$1.63 per sq. ft.7.9
Vehicle Service
Station Canopies
Lower $7.13 per sq. ft.Not applicable
Non-sales
Canopies
Lower $0.68 per sq. ft.Not applicable
Outdoor Dining Lower $0.87 per sq. ft.Not applicable
City of Chula Vista Printed on 4/19/2018Page 6 of 8
powered by Legistar™2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 55
File#:18-0030, Item#: 4.
Outdoor
Lighting
Category
Additional
Installation
Cost
Lifecycle Energy
Bill Savings
Benefit to
Cost Ratio
Building
Entrances
Lower $173 per installed
fixture
Not applicable
Primary Entrances Lower $672 per installed
fixture
Not applicable
Drive Up
Windows
Lower $550 per installed
fixture
Not applicable
Outdoor Sales
Frontage
$11.17 per ft.$82 per ft.7.35
Building Facades $0.02 per sq.
ft.
$132 per sq. ft.51.4
Outdoor Sales
Lots
Lower $4.60 per sq. ft.Not applicable
Vehicle Service
Station Hardscape
$0.21 per sq.
ft.
$1.63 per sq. ft.7.9
Vehicle Service
Station Canopies
Lower $7.13 per sq. ft.Not applicable
Non-sales
Canopies
Lower $0.68 per sq. ft.Not applicable
Outdoor Dining Lower $0.87 per sq. ft.Not applicable
Reductions in Energy Use and GHG Emissions & Other Cities Taking Similar Action:
Higher efficiency lighting required by this ordinance will consume between 32% and 81% less energy
depending on the specific lighting application and lighting zone. Citywide, the ordinance is estimated
to save more than 3,300 MTCo2e emissions from covered buildings over the useful life of the
products. The City of Fremont, California implemented a similar outdoor lighting efficiency
requirement in April of 2017.
Required Next Steps:
In order for the City to adopt and enforce increased building energy standards, the City must submit
an application to the California Energy Commission and obtain approval before the increased
standards can take effect. The application submittal must include:
1) The proposed standards as adopted by Council,
2) The City’s determination that the proposed standards will save energy and are cost-
effective
3) A study with supporting analysis for the City’s energy savings and cost effectiveness
findings
4) A statement that the proposed standards will require buildings to be designed to
consume no more energy than permitted by the State Building Energy Efficiency
Standards and
The ordinance includes the necessary energy savings and cost effectiveness findings. By reviewing
the attached cost effectiveness study and adopting this proposed ordinance, Council will be making
the cost effectiveness and energy savings determinations mentioned above. After City Council votes
City of Chula Vista Printed on 4/19/2018Page 7 of 8
powered by Legistar™2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 56
File#:18-0030, Item#: 4.
the cost effectiveness and energy savings determinations mentioned above. After City Council votes
on the proposed Ordinance after first reading, staff will submit the application to the CEC for their
review and approval. The CEC review and approval process can take up to three months. After
CEC approval, staff will file the ordinance with the California Building Standards Commission and the
ordinance will go into effect 30 days after the CEC approval.
DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT
Staff has reviewed the decision contemplated by this action and has determined that it is not site
specific and consequently, the 500-foot rule found in California Code of Regulations section 18704.2
(a)(1), is not applicable to this decision. Staff is not independently aware, and has not been informed
by any City Council member, of any other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision maker
conflict of interest in this matter.
LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS
The City’s Strategic Plan has five major goals: Operational Excellence, Economic Vitality, Healthy
Community, Strong and Secure Neighborhoods and a Connected Community. This ordinance is a
part of the 2017 Climate Action Plan implementation which was identified under the Strategic Plan’s
Healthy Community goal 3.2.2 and goal 3.1.1 which seeks to implement policies that support a
healthy community.
CURRENT YEAR FISCAL IMPACT
No current year fiscal impact. The building permit review and inspection time associated with
implementing this Ordinance will be funded through building permit fees.
ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT
No ongoing fiscal impact. The building permit review and inspection time associated with
implementing this Ordinance will be funded through building permit fees.
ATTACHMENTS
1) Attachment 1 - LED Ordinance Overview
2) Attachment 2 - Outdoor Lighting Power Allowances - Final Report
3) Attachment 3 - Outdoor Lighting Zones Map
Staff Contact: Cory Downs, Conservation Specialist II
City of Chula Vista Printed on 4/19/2018Page 8 of 8
powered by Legistar™2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 57
ORDINANCE NO. _______________
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING
CHAPTER 15.26 OF THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE TO
INCREASE OUTDOOR LIGHTING EFFCIENCY FOR SPECIFIC
COMMERCIAL OUTDOOR LIGHTING APPLICATIONS
WHEREAS, the California Building Standards Code(“CBSC”) (Title 24 of the
California Code of Regulations) contains the state’s energy and water efficiency
requirements for newly-constructed buildings, as well as for additions and alterations to
existing buildings; and
WHEREAS, the CBSC is published every three years by the California Building
Standards Commission, and was most recently published in 2016 (“2016 Edition”); and
WHEREAS, the City adopted the 2016 Edition, which is codified in Chula Vista
Municipal Code Chapter 15.26; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Title 24, local jurisdictions may establish more restrictive
building standards reasonably necessary because of local climatic, geological, or
topographical conditions; and
WHEREAS, as presented in a City-wide 2012 greenhouse gas inventory, Chula Vista's
greenhouse gas emissions have increased since 1990 due largely to new residential
growth; and
WHEREAS, as a result, the City Council directed staff to convene a Climate Change
Working Group (CCWG) to develop recommendations to reduce the community’s
greenhouse gas emissions; and
WHEREAS, the CCWG’s recommended climate protection measures included
facilitating more energy efficiency upgrades, and were adopted as part of the City’s 2017
Climate Action Plan, which directed staff to implement the measures based on funding
levels; and
WHEREAS, in alignment with the 2017 Climate Action Plan, staff recommends adopting
local building energy standards for non-residential outdoor lighting that generally reduce
the maximum outdoor lighting power allowances by 32-81%, based on the use; and
WHEREAS, adopting such standards requires amending Code Chapter 15. 26; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Administrative Code, Title 24, Part I, Section 10-
106, Locally Adopted Energy Standards, and the CEC' s submittal and approval process,
the City finds that the requirements below will save energy and are cost-effective within
the City; and
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 58
Ordinance
Page 2
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the modifications to the CBSC, as detailed in this
Ordinance, are reasonably necessary due to local climatic conditions; and
WHEREAS, the City Council further finds that, as a result of high summer ambient
temperatures and periods of heat waves, average load demand and peak load demand of
energy used in the City is an important factor concerning public safety and adverse
economic impacts of power outages or power reductions; and
WHEREAS, the City Council further finds that the reduction of total and peak energy
use, as a result of incremental energy conservation measures required by this Ordinance,
will have local and regional benefits in the cost-effective reduction of energy costs for the
building owner, additional available system energy capacity, and a reduction in
greenhouse gas emissions; and
WHEREAS, the City affirms that the requirements below will require buildings to be
designed to consume no more energy than permitted by Title 24 Part 6; and
WHEREAS, this Ordinance is intended to preserve and enhance the environment of the
City and is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section
15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines, because there is no possibility that the ordinance
may have a significant negative impact on the environment, and is exempt from the
requirements of CEQA pursuant to Section 15308 of the CEQA Guidelines, which
exempts actions taken by regulatory agencies for the enhancement and protection of the
environment; and
WHEREAS, staff shall work with the City Council, consultant and appropriate agencies
in advance to implement future local amendments so that they are in place no later than
the effective date of the State's new standards whenever possible.
NOW THEREFORE the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does ordain as follows:
Section I. Findings
Each of the above recitals is true and correct and each of the findings and determinations
stated above is hereby adopted by the City Council.
Section II. Amendments to Chapter 15.26
Chapter 15.26 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code is hereby amended by addition of the
sections 15.26.030, as follows:
15.26.030 Reduced Power Allowances for Specific Outdoor Lighting Applications
A. Purpose and Intent
It is the purpose and intent of this section to provide standards for builders and
developers of newly constructed and existing commercial buildings to exceed the
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 59
Ordinance
Page 3
minimum requirements of the 2016 California Building Energy Efficiency Standards for
Residential and Non-Residential Buildings (California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part
6) (“2016 Energy Efficiency Standards”) by requiring the installation of more energy-
efficient outdoor lighting for specific applications, in an effort to reduce greenhouse gas
emissions from energy usage.
B. Requirements
Table 140.7-B of the 2016 Building Energy Efficiency Standards is amended by
modifying the following rows below the header to read as follows. The remainder of
Table 140.7-B is unchanged.
Table 140.7-B: Additional Lighting Power Allowances for Specific Applications
Lighting Application Lighting
Zone 0
Lighting
Zone 1
Lighting
Zone 2
Lighting
Zone 3
Lighting
Zone 4
WATTAGE ALLOWANCE PER APPLICATION. Use all that apply as appropriate.
Building Entrances or Exits.Allowance per
door. Luminaires qualifying for this allowance
shall be within 20 feet of the door.
Not
applicable
15 9 watts 25 15
watts
35 19
watts
45 21 watts
Primary Entrances to Senior Care Facilities,
Police Stations, Hospitals, Fire Stations, and
Emergency Vehicle Facilities.Allowance per
primary entrance(s) only. Primary entrances shall
provide access for the general public and shall
not be used exclusively for staff or service
personnel. This allowance shall be in 'addition to
the building entrance or exit allowance above.
Luminaires qualifying for this allowance shall be
within 100 feet of the primary entrance.
Not
applicable
45 20 watts 80 40
watts
120 57
watts
130 60
watts
Drive Up Windows.Allowance per customer
service location. Luminaires qualifying for this
allowance shall be within 2 mounting heights of
the sill of the window.
Not
applicable
40 16 watts 75 30
watts
125 50
watts
200 75
watts
Vehicle Service Station Uncovered Fuel
Dispenser.Allowance per fueling dispenser.
Luminaires qualifying for this allowance shall be
within 2 mounting heights of the dispenser.
Not
applicable
120
watts
175
watts
185
watts
330
watts
ATM Machine Lighting.Allowance per ATM
machine. Luminaires qualifying for this allowance
shall be within 50 feet of the dispenser.
Not
applicable
250 watts for first ATM machine, 70 watts for each
additional ATM machine.
WATTAGE ALLOWANCE PER UNIT LENGTH (w/linear ft). May
be used for one or two frontage side(s) per site.
Outdoor Sales Frontage.Allowance for frontage
immediately adjacent to the principal viewing
location(s) and unobstructed for its viewing
length. A corner sales lot may include two
adjacent sides provided that a different principal
viewing location exists for each side. Luminaires
qualifying for this allowance shall be located
between the principal viewing location and the
Not
applicable
No
Allowance
22.5 11
W/linear ft
36 19
W/linear ft
45 25
W/linear ft
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 60
Ordinance
Page 4
frontage outdoor sales area.
WATTAGE ALLOWANCE PER HARDSCAPE AREA (W/ft²). May
be used for any illuminated hardscape area on the site.
Hardscape Ornamental Lighting.Allowance for
the total site illuminated hardscape area.
Luminaires qualifying for this allowance shall be
rated for 100 watts or less as determined in
accordance with Section 130.0(d), and shall be
post-top luminaires, lanterns, pendant luminaires,
or chandeliers.
Not
applicable
No
Allowance
0.02
W/ft²
0.04
W/ft²
0.06
W/ft²
WATTAGE ALLOWANCE PER SPECIFIC AREA (W/ft²). Use as
appropriate provided that none of the following specific
applications shall be used for the same area.
Building Facades. Only areas of building façade
that are illuminated shall qualify for this
allowance. Luminaires qualifying for this
allowance shall be aimed at the façade and shall
be capable of illuminating it without obstruction or
interference by permanent building features or
other objects.
Not
applicable
No
Allowance
0.18 0.100
W/ft2
0.35 0.170
W/ft2
0.50 0.225
W/ft2
Outdoor Sales Lots.Allowance for uncovered
sales lots used exclusively for the display of
vehicles or other merchandise for sale.
Driveways, parking lots or other non sales areas
shall be considered hardscape areas even if
these areas are completely surrounded by sales
lot on all sides. Luminaires qualifying for this
allowance shall be within 5 mounting heights of
the sales lot area.
Not
applicable
0.164 0.06
W/ft²
0.555 0.21
W/ft²
0.758 0.28
W/ft²
1.285 0.485
W/ft²
Vehicle Service Station Hardscape. Allowance
for the total illuminated hardscape area less area
of buildings, under canopies, off property, or
obstructed by signs or structures. Luminaires
qualifying for this allowance shall be illuminating
the hardscape area and shall not be within a
building, below a canopy, beyond property lines,
or obstructed by a sign or other structure.
Not
applicable
0.014 0.006
W/ft²
0.155
0.068
W/ft²
0.308
0.138
W/ft²
0.485 0.200
W/ft²
Vehicle Service Station Canopies.Allowance
for the total area within the drip line of the canopy.
Luminaires qualifying for this allowance shall be
located under the canopy.
Not
applicable
0.514 0.220
W/ft²
1.005
0.430
W/ft²
1.300
0.580
W/ft²
2.200 1.010
W/ft²
Sales Canopies.Allowance for the total area
within the drip line of the canopy. Luminaires
qualifying for this allowance shall be located
under the canopy.
Not
applicable
No
Allowance
0.655
W/ft²
0.908
W/ft²
1.135
W/ft²
Non-sales Canopies and Tunnels.Allowance
for the total area within the drip line of the canopy
or inside the tunnel. Luminaires qualifying for this
allowance shall be located under the canopy or
tunnel.
Not
applicable
0.084 0.057
W/ft²
0.205
0.137
W/ft²
0.408 0.27
W/ft²
0.585 0.37
W/ft²
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 61
Ordinance
Page 5
Guard Stations.Allowance up to 1,000 square
feet per vehicle lane. Guard stations provide
access to secure areas controlled by security
personnel who stop and may inspect vehicles and
vehicle occupants, including identification,
documentation, vehicle license plates, and
vehicle contents. Qualifying luminaires shall be
within 2 mounting heights of a vehicle lane or the
guardhouse.
Not
applicable
0.154
W/ft²
0.355
W/ft²
0.708
W/ft²
0.985
W/ft²
Student Pick-up/Drop-off zone. Allowance for
the area of the student pick-up/drop-off zone, with
or without canopy, for preschool through 12th
grade school campuses. A student pick-up/drop
off zone is a curbside, controlled traffic area on a
school campus where students are picked-up and
dropped off from vehicles. The allowed area shall
be the smaller of the actual width or 25 feet, times
the smaller of the actual length or 250 feet.
Qualifying luminaires shall be within 2 mounting
heights of the student pick-up/drop-off zone.
Not
applicable
No
Allowance
0.12
W/ft²
0.45
W/ft²
No
Allowance
Outdoor Dining. Allowance for the total
illuminated hardscape of outdoor dining. Outdoor
dining areas are hardscape areas used to serve
and consume food and beverages. Qualifying
luminaires shall be within 2 mounting heights of
the hardscape area of outdoor dining.
Not
applicable
0.014 0.004
W/ft2
0.135
0.030
W/ft2
0.240
0.050
W/ft2
0.400 0.075
W/ft2
Special Security Lighting for Retail Parking
and Pedestrian Hardscape.This additional
allowance is for illuminated retail parking and
pedestrian hardscape identified as having special
security needs. This allowance shall be in
addition to the building entrance or exit
allowance.
Not
applicable
0.007
W/ft²
0.009
W/ft²
0.019
W/ft²
No
Allowance
C. Exemptions
The Building Official may exempt a covered building from the provisions of this section
if the Official determines there are sufficient practical challenges to make satisfaction of
the requirements infeasible. The applicant is responsible for demonstrating requirement
infeasibility when applying for an exemption. Applications for exemptions shall be made,
in writing, to the Building Official. The Building Official’s determination can be
appealed per Chula Vista Municipal Code (CVMC) 15.06.070 and California Building
Code Section 1.8.8.
Section III. Severability
If any portion of this Ordinance, or its application to any person or circumstance, is for
any reason held to be invalid, unenforceable or unconstitutional, by a court of competent
jurisdiction, that portion shall be deemed severable, and such invalidity, unenforceability
or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining
portions of the Ordinance, or its application to any other person or circumstance. The
City Council of the City of Chula Vista hereby declares that it would have adopted each
section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance, irrespective of the fact that any one
or more other sections, sentences, clauses or phrases of the Ordinance be declared
invalid, unenforceable or unconstitutional.
Section IV. Construction
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 62
Ordinance
Page 6
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista intends this Ordinance to supplement, not to
duplicate or contradict, applicable state and federal law and this Ordinance shall be
construed in light of that intent.
Section V. Effective Date
This ordinance shall take effect on the 30th day following approval by the California
Energy Commission.
Section VI. Publication
The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause
the same to be published or posted according to law.
Presented by Approved as to form by
_________________________________________________________________________
Eric Crockett Glen R. Googins
Director of Economic Development City Attorney
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 63
Policy Summary | Outdoor Lighting
Efficiency Requirements
Policy Overview
●Applies to specific commercial outdoor lighting applications
●Adjusts outdoor lighting power allowances (LPAs) downward to levels that can now be
achieved at the same level of lighting output because of progress in LED lighting
technology
●Updates are based on a 2017 study prepared for the CEC in development of 2019 energy
codes that found market availability of lighting fixtures, performance and cost
competitiveness has rapidly improved
●Expected to reduce GHG emissions by roughly 3,300 metric tons over the useful life of
the products.
●Shown to be cost-effective. In 7 out of 10 lighting categories, the higher efficiency
lighting actually costs less, in the other two cases, lifecycle benefits are more than 7 times
the extra cost
Proposed Requirements
●Applicable to new non-residential construction and retrofits where at least 50% of lights
are replaced
●Affects 10 commercial outdoor lighting application categories
●Reduces maximum outdoor LPAs by 32-81%
●Adjusted allowances are shown in table below:
Outdoor Lighting Application Lighting
Zone 0
Lighting
Zone 1
Lighting
Zone 2
Lighting
Zone 3
Lighting
Zone 4
Building Entrances or Exits (watts)NA ˠ ˠ ˠ ˠ
Primary Entrances to Senior Care, Police
Stations, Hospitals, Fire Stations, and
Emergency Vehicle Facilities (watts)
NA ˠ ˠ ˠ ˠ
Drive-Up Windows (watts)NA ˠ ˠ ˠ ˠ
Outdoor Sales Frontage (W/ft)NA None ˠ ˠ ˠ
Building Facades (W/ft2)NA None ˠ ˠ ˠ
Outdoor Sales Lots NA ˠ ˠ ˠ
ˠ
Vehicle Service Station Hardscape (W/ft2)NA ˠ ˠ ˠ ˠ
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 64
Vehicle Service Station Canopies (W/ft2)NA ˠ ˠ
ˠ ˠ
Non-Sales Canopies (W/ft2)NA ˠ
ˠ
ˠ
ˠ
Outdoor Dining (W/ft2)NA ˠ
ˠ ˠˠ
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 65
DOCKETED
Docket
Number:
17 -BSTD -02
Project Title:2019 Title 24, Part 6, Building Energy Efficiency Standards Rulemaking
TN #:222198
Document
Title:
CASE Report Outdoor Lighting Power Allowances
Description:Codes and Standards Enhancement (CASE) Initiative Report for the 2019
California Building Energy Efficiency Standards.
Filer:Adrian Ownby
Organization:California Energy Commission
Submitter Role:Commission Staff
Submission
Date:
1/18/2018 2:48:49 PM
Docketed
Date:
1/18/2018
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 66
Codes and Standards Enhancement (CASE) Initiative
2019 California Building Energy Efficiency Standards
Outdoor Lighting Power Allowances –
Final Report
Measure Number: 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F
Nonresidential Lighting
August 2017
This report was prepared by the California Statewide Codes and Standards Enhancement (CASE) Program that is funded, in part, by California
utility customers under the auspices of the California Public Utilities Commission.
Copyright 2017 Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Southern California Edison, Southern California Gas Company, San Diego Gas & Electric
Company, Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, and Sacramento Municipal Utility District.
All rights reserved, except that this document may be used, copied, and distributed without modification.
Neither Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Southern California Edison, Southern California Gas Company, San Diego Gas & Electric Company,
Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, Sacramento Municipal Utility District, or any of its employees makes any warranty, express of
implied; or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any data, information, method, product,
policy or process disclosed in this document; or represents that its use will not infringe any privately-owned rights including, but not limited to,
patents, trademarks or copyrights.
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 67
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page i
Document Information
Category: Codes and Standards
Keywords: Statewide Codes and Standards Enhancement (CASE) Initiative,
Statewide Utility Codes and Standards Team, Statewide C&S Team,
Codes and Standards Enhancements, 2019 Title 24 Part 6, efficiency,
outdoor lighting.
Authors: Christopher Uraine, Mike McGaraghan (Energy Solutions); Nancy
Clanton, Annie Kuczkowski (Clanton & Associates)
Project Management: California Utilities Statewide Codes and Standards Team: Pacific Gas
and Electric Company, Southern California Edison, SoCalGas®, San
Diego Gas & Electric Company, Los Angeles Department of Water and
Power, and Sacramento Municipal Utility District
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 68
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page ii
Table of Contents
Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... ix
1. Introduction ...........................................................................................................................1
2. Measure Description .............................................................................................................2
2.1 Measure Overview ...................................................................................................................... 2
2.2 Measure History ......................................................................................................................... 3
2.3 Summary of Proposed Changes to Code Documents ................................................................. 4
2.4 Regulatory Context ..................................................................................................................... 5
2.5 Compliance and Enforcement ..................................................................................................... 5
3. Market Analysis .....................................................................................................................5
3.1 Market Structure ......................................................................................................................... 6
3.2 Technical Feasibility, Market Availability, and Current Practices ............................................. 6
3.3 Market Impacts and Economic Assessments .............................................................................. 6
3.4 Economic Impacts ...................................................................................................................... 8
4. Energy Savings .....................................................................................................................11
4.1 Key Assumptions for Energy Savings Analysis ....................................................................... 11
4.2 Energy Savings Methodology ................................................................................................... 13
4.3 Per-Unit Energy Impacts Results .............................................................................................. 14
5. Lifecycle Cost and Cost-Effectiveness ...............................................................................18
5.1 Energy Cost Savings Methodology .......................................................................................... 18
5.2 Energy Cost Savings Results .................................................................................................... 19
5.3 Incremental First Cost............................................................................................................... 21
5.4 Lifetime Incremental Maintenance Costs ................................................................................. 22
5.5 Lifecycle Cost-Effectiveness .................................................................................................... 24
6. First-Year Statewide Impacts .............................................................................................28
6.1 Statewide Energy Savings and Lifecycle Energy Cost Savings ............................................... 28
6.2 Statewide Water Use Impacts ................................................................................................... 32
6.3 Statewide Material Impacts ...................................................................................................... 32
6.4 Other Non-Energy Impacts ....................................................................................................... 32
7. Proposed Revisions to Code Language ..............................................................................32
7.1 Standards .................................................................................................................................. 33
7.2 Reference Appendices .............................................................................................................. 36
7.3 ACM Reference Manual ........................................................................................................... 36
7.4 Compliance Manuals ................................................................................................................ 36
7.5 Compliance Documents ............................................................................................................ 36
8. Bibliography .........................................................................................................................36
Appendix A : Statewide Savings Methodology .......................................................................38
Appendix B : Discussion of Impacts of Compliance Process on Market Actors .................49
Appendix C : Target Illuminance Levels ................................................................................55
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 69
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page iii
Appendix D : Nonresidential Use Schedules ...........................................................................62
Appendix E : Lighting Models .................................................................................................73
Appendix F : Lumen Maintenance Data ...............................................................................117
Appendix G : Narrow Band LED Luminaire Efficacy Comparison ..................................141
Appendix H : General Hardscape Statewide Savings Assumptions ...................................143
Appendix I : Specific Applications Statewide Savings Assumptions ..................................146
Appendix J : Stakeholder Survey ..........................................................................................151
List of Tables
Table 1: Scope of Code Change Proposal ..................................................................................................... x
Table 2: Estimated Statewide First-Yeara Energy and Water Savings......................................................... xi
Table 3: Industries Receiving Energy Efficiency Related Investment, by North American Industry
Classification System (NAICS) Code.................................................................................................... 9
Table 4: Prototype Buildings Used for Energy, Demand, Cost, and Environmental Impacts Analysis for
General Hardscape ............................................................................................................................... 12
Table 5: First-Year Energy Impacts Per-Unit for General Hardscape ........................................................ 15
Table 6: First-Year Energy Impacts Per-Unit – Specific Applications Lighting Zone 1 ............................ 15
Table 7: First-Year Energy Impacts Per-Unit – Specific Applications Lighting Zone 2 ............................ 16
Table 8: First-Year Energy Impacts per Unit - Specific Applications Lighting Zone 3 ............................. 17
Table 9: First-Year Energy Impacts per Unit - Specific Applications Lighting Zone 4 ............................. 18
Table 10: Lighting Zone Area Weighting Factors ...................................................................................... 19
Table 11: TDV Energy Cost Savings Over a 15-Year Period of Analysis, General Hardscape – Per-Unit 19
Table 12: Specific Applications TDV Energy Cost Savings Over a 15-Year Period of Analysis – Per-Unit
– New Construction ............................................................................................................................. 20
Table 13: Specific Applications TDV Energy Cost Savings Over a 15-Year Period of Analysis – Per-Unit
– Alterations ........................................................................................................................................ 21
Table 14: General Hardscape First Cost, Routine Maintenance Cost, and Total Incremental Cost ........... 23
Table 15: Specific Applications First-Cost, Routine Maintenance Cost, and Total Incremental Cost –
Weighted of All Lighting Zonesa ......................................................................................................... 23
Table 16: General Hardscape Lifecycle Cost-Effectiveness Summary Per-Unit – New Construction ...... 24
Table 17: General Hardscape Lifecycle Cost-Effectiveness Summary Per-Unit – Alterations .................. 25
Table 18: Specific Applications Lifecycle Cost-effectiveness Summary Per-Unit – New Construction ... 26
Table 19: Specific Applications Lifecycle Cost-effectiveness Summary Per-Unit – Alterations .............. 27
Table 20: General Hardscape Statewide Energy and Energy Cost Impacts – New Construction .............. 29
Table 21: General Hardscape Statewide Energy and Energy Cost Impacts – Alterations .......................... 29
Table 22: Specific Applications Statewide Energy and Energy Cost Impacts – New Construction .......... 30
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 70
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page iv
Table 23: Specific Applications Statewide Energy and Energy Cost Impacts – Alterations ...................... 31
Table 24: Impacts of Material Usec............................................................................................................. 32
Table 25: 2016 Table 140.7-A General Hardscape Format and LPAs ....................................................... 33
Table 26: Proposed Format With New LPAs For Table 140.7-A General Hardscape ............................... 34
Table 27: New LPAs For Table 140.7-B Specific Applications ................................................................. 34
Table 28: Estimated New Nonresidential Construction Impacted by Proposed Code Change in 2020, by
Climate Zone and Building Type (Million Square Feet) ..................................................................... 40
Table 29: Estimated Existing Nonresidential Floorspace Impacted by Proposed Code Change in 2020
(Alterations), by Climate Zone and Building Type (Million Square Feet) .......................................... 41
Table 30: Translation from Forecast Climate Zone (FCZ) to Building Standards Climate Zone (BSCZ) . 42
Table 31: Description of Building Types and Sub-types (Prototypes) in Statewide Construction Forecast
............................................................................................................................................................. 43
Table 32: Converting from Forecast Climate Zone (FCZ) to Building Standards Climate Zone (BSCZ) –
Example Calculation ............................................................................................................................ 44
Table 33: Percent of Floorspace Impacted by Proposed Measure, by Building Type ................................ 45
Table 34: Percent of Floorspace Impacted by Proposed Measure, by Climate Zone ................................. 46
Table 35: Percent Construction by Lighting Zone ...................................................................................... 46
Table 36: Assumptions for Converting Indoor New Construction Forecasts to Outdoor Spaces for Specific
Applications – Table 140.7-B .............................................................................................................. 47
Table 37: Changes to Assumptions for Converting Indoor New Construction Forecasts to Outdoor Spaces
for Specific Applications – Table 140.7-B .......................................................................................... 48
Table 38: Assumptions for Converting Indoor New Construction Forecasts to Outdoor Spaces for General
Hardscape – Table 140.7-A ................................................................................................................. 48
Table 39: Roles of Market Actors in The Proposed Compliance Process .................................................. 50
Table 40: IES RP-20-2014 Recommended Maintained Illuminance Values for Parking Lots ................... 55
Table 41: 2019 Target Illuminance Criteria ................................................................................................ 56
Table 42: Application Use Schedules ......................................................................................................... 63
Table 43: General Hardscape 2016 LED Cost Impact ................................................................................ 74
Table 44: General Hardscape 2019 LED Cost Impact ................................................................................ 75
Table 45: General Hardscape Calculation Results and LPA Recommendations in Red ............................ 77
Table 46: 2016 LED Prototype Site Calculations ....................................................................................... 78
Table 47: 2016 LED Prototype Site Calculations ....................................................................................... 79
Table 48: Proposed 2019 LED Prototype Site Calculations ....................................................................... 80
Table 49: Proposed 2019 LED Prototype Site Calculations ....................................................................... 81
Table 50: Building Entrances and Exits Calculation Results and LPA Recommendations in Red ............ 82
Table 51: Building Entrances and Exits Legacy Product Calculation ........................................................ 83
Table 52: Building Entrances and Exits Equivalent LED Calculation ....................................................... 84
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 71
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page v
Table 53: Primary Entrances Calculation Results and LPA Recommendations in Red ............................. 85
Table 54: Primary Entrances Legacy Product Calculation ......................................................................... 86
Table 55: Primary Entrances LED Calculation ........................................................................................... 87
Table 56: Drive-Up Windows Calculation Results and LPA Recommendations in Red ........................... 88
Table 57: Drive-Up Windows Legacy Product Calculation ....................................................................... 88
Table 58: Drive-Up Windows Equivalent LED Calculation ...................................................................... 89
Table 59: Uncovered Fuel Dispenser Calculation Results and LPA Recommendations in Red ................ 89
Table 60: Uncovered Fuel Dispenser Legacy Product Calculation ............................................................ 90
Table 61: Uncovered Fuel Dispenser Equivalent LED Calculation ........................................................... 90
Table 62: ATM Machine Lighting Calculation Results and LPA Recommendations in Red .................... 90
Table 63: ATM Machine Lighting Legacy Product Calculation ................................................................ 91
Table 64: ATM Machine Lighting Equivalent LED Calculation ............................................................... 91
Table 65: Outdoor Sales Frontage Calculation Results and LPA Recommendations in Red ..................... 92
Table 66: Outdoor Sales Frontage Legacy Product Calculation ................................................................. 92
Table 67: Outdoor Sales Frontage Equivalent LED Calculation ................................................................ 93
Table 68: Hardscape Ornamental Lighting Calculation Results and LPA Recommendations in Red ....... 94
Table 69: Hardscape Ornamental Lighting Legacy Product Calculation ................................................... 94
Table 70: Hardscape Ornamental Lighting Equivalent LED Calculation................................................... 94
Table 71: Building Facades Calculation Results and LPA Recommendations in Red ............................... 95
Table 72: Building Facades Legacy Product Calculation ........................................................................... 96
Table 73: Building Facades Equivalent LED Calculation .......................................................................... 97
Table 74: Outdoor Sales Lots Calculation Results and LPA Recommendations in Red ............................ 98
Table 75: Outdoor Sales Lots Legacy Product Calculation ........................................................................ 98
Table 76: Outdoor Sales Lots Equivalent LED Calculation ....................................................................... 99
Table 77: Vehicle Service Station Hardscape Calculation Results and LPA Recommendations in Red ... 99
Table 78: Vehicle Service Station Hardscape Legacy Product Calculation ............................................. 100
Table 79: Vehicle Service Station Hardscape Equivalent LED Calculation ............................................ 100
Table 80: Vehicle Service Station Canopies Calculation Results and LPA Recommendations in Red ... 101
Table 81: Vehicle Service Station Canopies Legacy Product Calculation ............................................... 101
Table 82: Vehicle Service Station Canopies Equivalent LED Calculation .............................................. 102
Table 83: Sales Canopies Calculation Results and LPA Recommendations in Red ................................ 102
Table 84: Sales Canopies Legacy Product Calculation ............................................................................. 103
Table 85: Canopies Equivalent LED Calculation ..................................................................................... 104
Table 86: Non-sales Canopies and Pedestrian Tunnels Calculation Results and LPA Recommendation in
Red ..................................................................................................................................................... 105
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 72
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page vi
Table 87: Non-sales Canopies and Pedestrian Tunnels Legacy Product Calculation ............................... 106
Table 88: Non-sales Canopies and Pedestrian Tunnels Equivalent LED Calculation .............................. 107
Table 89: Guard Stations Calculation Results and LPA Recommendations in Red ................................. 108
Table 90: Guard Stations Legacy Product Calculation ............................................................................. 109
Table 91: Guard Station Equivalent LED Calculation .............................................................................. 110
Table 92: Student Pick-up/Drop Off Zones Calculation Results and LPA Recommendations in Red ..... 111
Table 93: Student Pick-Up/Drop-Off Zones Legacy Product Calculation ............................................... 112
Table 94: Student Pick-Up/Drop-Off Zones Equivalent LED Calculation............................................... 113
Table 95: Outdoor Dining Calculation Results and LPA Recommendations in Red ............................... 114
Table 96: Outdoor Dining Legacy Product Calculation ........................................................................... 114
Table 97: Outdoor Dining Equivalent LED Calculation........................................................................... 114
Table 98: Special Security Lighting for Retail Parking and Pedestrian Hardscape Calculation Results and
LPA Recommendations in Red ......................................................................................................... 115
Table 99: Special Security Lighting for Retail Parking and Pedestrian Hardscape Legacy Product
Calculation ......................................................................................................................................... 115
Table 100: Special Security Lighting for Retail Parking and Pedestrian Hardscape Equivalent LED
Calculation ......................................................................................................................................... 116
Table 101: General Hardscape LED Luminaire Reported Lumen Maintenance ...................................... 118
Table 102: Specific Applications Light Source Maintenance Period ....................................................... 119
Table 103: Specific Applications LED Luminaire Reported Life ............................................................ 120
Table 104: Maintenance Labor Cost ......................................................................................................... 121
Table 105: Legacy Product Easy Maintenance Access Cost .................................................................... 122
Table 106: Legacy Product Moderate Maintenance Access Cost ............................................................. 123
Table 107: Legacy Product Moderate Difficult Access Cost .................................................................... 124
Table 108: Building Entrances and Exits Legacy Product Maintenance .................................................. 125
Table 109: Primary Entrance Legacy Product Maintenance ..................................................................... 126
Table 110: Drive-Up Windows Legacy Product Maintenance ................................................................. 127
Table 111: Uncovered Fuel Dispenser Legacy Product Maintenance ...................................................... 127
Table 112: ATM Machine Lighting Legacy Product Maintenance .......................................................... 128
Table 113: Outdoor Sales Frontage Legacy Product Maintenance ........................................................... 129
Table 114: Hardscape Ornamental Lighting Legacy Product Maintenance ............................................. 130
Table 115: Building Facades Legacy Product Maintenance ..................................................................... 131
Table 116: Outdoor Sales Lots Legacy Product Maintenance .................................................................. 132
Table 117: Vehicle Service Station Hardscapes Legacy Product Maintenance ........................................ 133
Table 118: Vehicle Service Station-Canopies Legacy Product Maintenance ........................................... 134
Table 119: Sales Canopies Legacy Product Maintenance ........................................................................ 135
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 73
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page vii
Table 120: Non-Sales Canopies and Pedestrian Tunnels Legacy Product Maintenance .......................... 136
Table 121: Guard Station Legacy Product Maintenance .......................................................................... 137
Table 122: Student Pick Up Legacy Product Maintenance ...................................................................... 138
Table 123: Outdoor Dining Legacy Product Maintenance ....................................................................... 139
Table 124: Special Security for Retail and Pedestrian Hardscape Legacy Product Maintenance ............ 140
Table 125: Narrow Band LED Luminaires Comparison .......................................................................... 141
Table 126: Average Efficacies of White Light Luminaires Compared to Narrow Band LED Luminaires
........................................................................................................................................................... 142
Table 127: Modeled Auto Dealership Lots for Sales Lots and Sales Frontage ........................................ 147
Table 128: Vehicle Service Station Canopies and Hardscape Assumptions Analysis Results ................. 149
List of Figures
Figure 1: General Hardscape schedule showing percentage of rated power (y-axis) and hours in a day (x-
axis). .................................................................................................................................................... 64
Figure 2: Schedule A showing percentage of rated power (y-axis) and hours in a day (x-axis). ............... 65
Figure 3: Schedule B showing percentage of rated power (y-axis) and hours in a day (x-axis). ................ 66
Figure 4: Schedule C showing percentage of rated power (y-axis) and hours in a day (x-axis). ................ 67
Figure 5: Schedule D showing percentage of rated power (y-axis) and hours in a day (x-axis). ............... 68
Figure 6: Retail schedule showing percentage of rated power (y-axis) and hours in a day (x-axis)........... 69
Figure 7: Service station hardscape schedule showing percentage of rated power (y-axis) and hours in a
day (x-axis). ......................................................................................................................................... 70
Figure 8: Service station canopies schedule showing percentage of rated power (y-axis) and hours in a day
(x-axis). ................................................................................................................................................ 71
Figure 9: ATM schedule showing percentage of rated power (y-axis) and hours in a day (x-axis). .......... 72
Figure 10: Outdoor dining schedule showing percentage of rated power (y-axis) and hours in a day (x-
axis). .................................................................................................................................................... 72
Figure 11: Three site models used for real design calculations. ................................................................. 73
Figure 12: Nine site prototypes used to determine reasonable site calculations. ........................................ 76
Figure 13: Parking Space Requirements for Various Metropolitan Regions ............................................ 144
Figure 14: Representative Code Parking Space Requirements Employed ............................................... 145
Figure 15: Parking Space Area Multipliers Applied in Statewide Calculations ....................................... 145
Figure 16: Modeled medium sized auto dealership – purple shaded area represents sales frontage ........ 147
Figure 17: Modeled large sized auto dealership – purple shaded area represents sales frontage ............. 148
Figure 18: California Energy Commission gas station density estimates by county ................................ 150
Figure 19: Stakeholder survey respondents’ industry role. ....................................................................... 151
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 74
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page viii
Figure 20: Stakeholder survey respondents’ experience in lighting industry (as number of years). ........ 151
Figure 21: Stakeholder survey respondents’ geography. .......................................................................... 152
Figure 22: Assumptions for LED modeling. ............................................................................................. 152
Figure 23: Willingness to provide data. .................................................................................................... 153
Figure 24: EMI/RFI assumptions for LEDs. ............................................................................................. 153
Figure 25: Range of CCT for outdoor applications. ................................................................................. 154
Figure 26: Common types of dimming control systems used. .................................................................. 154
Figure 27: Frequency of variable CCT system usage in outdoor settings. ............................................... 155
Figure 28: Outdoor applications where CCT systems are not available. .................................................. 155
Figure 29: Variable CCT system assumptions. ......................................................................................... 156
Figure 30: Frequency of variable CCT system techniques. ...................................................................... 156
Figure 31: How variable CCT system techniques differ. .......................................................................... 156
Figure 32: Assumptions on rating “max” power for variable CCT systems. ............................................ 157
Figure 33: Assumptions on how to classify variable CCT systems. ......................................................... 157
Figure 34: Willingness to have follow up conversations. ......................................................................... 158
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 75
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page ix
E XECUTIVE S UMMARY
Introduction
The Codes and Standards Enhancement (CASE) initiative presents recommendations to support
California Energy Commission’s (Energy Commission) efforts to update California’s Building Energy
Efficiency Standards (Title 24, Part 6) to include new requirements or to upgrade existing requirements
for various technologies. The four California Investor Owned Utilities (IOUs) – Pacific Gas and Electric
Company, San Diego Gas and Electric, Southern California Edison, and SoCalGas® – and two Publicly
Owned Utilities (POUs) – Los Angeles Department of Water and Power and Sacramento Municipal
Utility District – sponsored this effort. The program goal is to prepare and submit proposals that will
result in cost-effective enhancements to improve energy efficiency and energy performance in
California buildings. This report and the code change proposals presented herein is a part of the effort to
develop technical and cost-effectiveness information for proposed requirements on building energy
efficient design practices and technologies.
The Statewide CASE Team submits code change proposals to the Energy Commission, the state agency
that has authority to adopt revisions to Title 24, Part 6. The Energy Commission will evaluate proposals
submitted by the Statewide CASE Team and other stakeholders. The Energy Commission may revise or
reject proposals. See the Energy Commission’s 2019 Title 24 website for information about the
rulemaking schedule and how to participate in the process:
http://www.energy.ca.gov/title24/2019standards/.
Measure Description
This proposed code change is an update to lighting power allowances (LPAs) for all outdoor
applications. It saves energy by extending the use of high efficacy light emitting diode (LED)
technology as the basis for LPA calculations for all outdoor areas (Table 140.7-A and Table 140.7-B),
which reduces the LPAs. Table 140.7-A (General Hardscape) was updated based on LED performance
levels during the 2016 code cycle, however, most changes to Table 140.7-B (Specific Applications)
were rejected due to the individual line items not being cost-effective. LED efficacy has continued to
grow and costs have continued to drop; all line items in Table 140.7-B are now cost-effective.
In addition to evaluating energy efficiency, the Statewide CASE Team considered lighting performance
criteria that affects installation decisions. For example, the Statewide CASE Team received feedback
from multiple stakeholders that it was important for warm correlated color temperature (CCT)
luminaires in the range of 3000 degrees Kalvin (K) to be able to meet the new LPAs. In addition to
stakeholder feedback, there has been a shift in outdoor lighting design towards warmer CCTs in recent
years, and many local governments have installed warm CCT outdoor luminaires (3000K to 4000K). As
a result, the Statewide CASE Team developed new LPAs that can be met by 3000K luminaires.1 The
Statewide CASE Team has not observed any significant momentum towards installations below 3000K.
1 This code change does not require 3000K luminaires to be used to meet the LPAs; it ensures that luminaires with CCTs as
low as 3000K can be used. Cooler CCT luminaires (CCTs higher than 3000K) have higher efficacies and can therefore be used
and meet the new LPAs as well.
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 76
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page x
Scope of Code Change Proposal
Table 1 summarizes the scope of the proposed changes and which sections of the Standards, Reference
Appendices, Alternative Calculation Manual (ACM) Reference Manual, and compliance documents that
will be modified as a result of the proposed change.
Table 1: Scope of Code Change Proposal
Measure Name Type of
Requirement
Modified
Section(s) of
Title 24, Part 6
Modified Title
24, Part 6
Appendices
Will
Compliance
Software Be
Modified
Modified
Compliance
Document(s)
Reduction of
nonresidential
outdoor LPAs
Prescriptive Section 140.7 None No None
Market Analysis and Regulatory Impact Assessment
This proposal is cost-effective over the 15-year period of the analysis. Overall, this proposal increases
the wealth of the State of California. California consumers and businesses save more money on energy
and routine maintenance than they spend for financing the efficiency measure. The proposed changes to
Title 24, Part 6 have a negligible impact on the complexity of the Standards or the cost of enforcement.
Cost-Effectiveness
The proposed code change was found to be cost-effective for all climate zones where it is proposed to
be required. The benefit-to-cost (B/C) ratio compares the lifecycle benefits (cost savings) to the
lifecycle costs. Measures that have a B/C ratio of 1.0 or greater are cost-effective. The larger the B/C
ratio, the faster the measure pays for itself from energy savings. The proposed requirements are cost
effective with very high B/C ratios. The B/C ratio is different for each application within the proposed
measure. For certain applications, incremental costs are zero or negative, which means that application
is immediately cost-effective.2 See Section 5 for a detailed description of the cost-effectiveness analysis.
Statewide Energy Impacts
Table 2 shows the estimated energy savings over the first twelve months of implementation of the
proposed code change. See Section 6 for more details.
2 The higher the B/C ratio, the faster a measure pays for itself. If a measure has an infinite B/C ratio, it means that there is no
incremental cost (or a negative incremental cost) and the measure is instantly cost-effective.
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 77
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page xi
Table 2: Estimated Statewide First-Yeara Energy and Water Savings
Measure
First-Year
Electricity
Savings
(GWh/yr)
First-Year Peak
Electrical
Demand
Reduction
(MW)
First-Year Water
Savings
(million
gallons/yr)
First-Year
Natural Gas
Savings
(million
therms/yr)
General Hardscape (subtotal) 59.52 1.00 N/A N/A
New Construction 15.08 0.25 N/A N/A
Additions and Alterations 44.44 0.75 N/A N/A
Specific Applications (subtotal) 58.43 1.36 N/A N/A
New Construction 14.75 0.34 N/A N/A
Additions and Alterations 43.68 1.02 N/A N/A
TOTAL 117.95 2.37 N/A N/A
a. First-year savings from all permitted outdoor lighting projects completed statewide in 2020 – including both new
construction and alterations.
Compliance and Enforcement
The Statewide CASE Team worked with stakeholders to develop a recommended compliance and
enforcement process and to identify the impacts this process will have on various market actors. The
compliance process is described in Section 2.5. The impacts the proposed measure will have on various
market actors are described in Section 3.3 and Appendix B. The key issues related to compliance and
enforcement are summarized below:
• The structure of the code requirements will stay the same with mostly changes to the numbers in
tables 140.7-A and 140.7-B.
• The LPA requirements in Table 140.7-A will be easier to interpret as the different requirements
for asphalt versus concrete parking lots have their own columns in the table. The current
standard has the requirements for concrete hardscapes for Lighting Zone (LZ) 2 and LZ3 in the
footnote to the table.
• An LPA multiplier for narrow band spectrum light sources has been added to Table 140.7-A to
accommodate the needs of environmentally sensitive areas.
Although a needs analysis has been conducted with the affected market actors while developing the
code change proposal, the code requirements may change between the time the final CASE Report is
submitted and the time the 2019 Standards are adopted. The recommended compliance process and
compliance documentation may also evolve with the code language. To effectively implement the
adopted code requirements, a plan should be developed that identifies potential barriers to compliance
when rolling-out the code change and approaches that should be deployed to minimize the barriers.
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 78
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 1
1. I NTRODUCTION
The Codes and Standards Enhancement (CASE) initiative presents recommendations to support
California Energy Commission’s (Energy Commission) efforts to update California’s Building Energy
Efficiency Standards (Title 24, Part 6) to include new requirements or to upgrade existing requirements
for various technologies. The four California Investor Owned Utilities (IOUs) – Pacific Gas and Electric
Company, San Diego Gas and Electric, Southern California Edison and SoCalGas® – and two Publicly
Owned Utilities (POUs) Los Angeles Department of Water and Power and Sacramento Municipal
Utility District sponsored this effort. The program goal is to prepare and submit proposals that will
result in cost-effective enhancements to energy efficiency in buildings. This report and the code change
proposal presented herein is a part of the effort to develop technical and cost-effectiveness information
for proposed requirements on building energy efficient design practices and technologies.
The Statewide CASE Team submits code change proposals to the Energy Commission, the state agency
that has authority to adopt revisions to Title 24, Part 6. The Energy Commission will evaluate proposals
submitted by the Statewide CASE Team and other stakeholders. The Energy Commission may revise or
reject proposals. See the Energy Commission’s 2019 Title 24 website for information about the
rulemaking schedule and how to participate in the process:
http://www.energy.ca.gov/title24/2019standards/.
The overall goal of this CASE Report is to propose a code change proposal for outdoor lighting power
allowances (LPAs). The report contains pertinent information supporting the code change.
When developing the code change proposal and associated technical information presented in this
report, the Statewide CASE Team worked with a number of industry stakeholders including building
officials, manufacturers, builders, utility incentive program managers, Title 24 energy analysts, and
others involved in the code compliance process. The proposal incorporates feedback received during a
public stakeholder workshop that the Statewide CASE Team held on September 8, 2016 and March 30,
2017.
Section 2 of this CASE Report provides a description of the measure and its background. This section
also presents a detailed description of how this change is accomplished in the various sections and
documents that make up the Title 24, Part 6.
Section 3 presents the market analysis, including a review of the current market structure. Section 3.2
describes the feasibility issues associated with the code change, including whether the proposed measure
overlaps or conflicts with other portions of the building standards such as fire, seismic, and other safety
standards and whether technical, compliance, or enforceability challenges exist.
Section 4 presents the per-unit energy, demand, and energy cost savings associated with the proposed
code change. This section also describes the methodology that the Statewide CASE Team used to
estimate energy, demand, and energy cost savings.
Section 5 presents the lifecycle cost and cost-effectiveness analysis. This includes a discussion of
additional materials and labor required to implement the measure and a quantification of the incremental
cost. It also includes estimates of incremental maintenance costs. That is, equipment lifetime and
various periodic costs associated with replacement and maintenance during the period of analysis.
Section 6 presents the statewide energy savings and environmental impacts of the proposed code change
for the first year after the 2019 Standards take effect. This includes the amount of energy that will be
saved by California building owners and tenants, and impacts (increases or reductions) on material with
emphasis placed on any materials that are considered toxic. Statewide water consumption impacts are
also considered.
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 79
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 2
Section 7 concludes the report with specific recommendations with strikeout (deletions) and underlined
(additions) language for the Standards, Reference Appendices, Alternative Calculation Manual (ACM)
Reference Manual, Compliance Manual, and Compliance Documents.
2. M EASURE D ESCRIPTION
2.1 Measure Overview
Exterior lighting accounts for at least eight percent of total commercial lighting energy use (and likely
more), which equates to approximately three terawatt hours annually in California (Meyer 2011). This
code change proposal would result in significant energy savings by dropping the LPAs for outdoor
lighting in new construction and alteration projects.
The proposed code change will impact the prescriptive requirements for outdoor lighting by reducing
the LPAs in Table 140.7-A (General Hardscape) and Table 140.7-B (Specific Applications). It is not
anticipated that sections of the Reference Appendices or Alternative Calculation Method (ACM)
Reference Manuals will be revised.
This proposal was developed using a similar method to what was used in previous code cycles. The
current LPA requirements (2016 Title 24, Part 6) are used as a base case for the analyses presented in
this report. The 2016 Nonresidential Outdoor Lighting Power Allowance CASE Study, which describes
the methodology for the 2016 code cycle is available on the Energy Commission’s website.3 The key
differences between the 2016 LPA requirements and the LPA requirements proposed for this code cycle
include:
• Proposed technology used to establish the 2019 LPAs is based on luminaires that are cost-
effective at the time of the analysis. Costs are expected to continue to decline before the
effective date of the standards.
• The efficacies of the products used to develop the 2016 LPAs have been updated for all the
major applications that fall under the scope of Table 140.7-A and Table 140.7-B. The standards
analysis accounts for typical high-performance equipment, lumen depreciation, equivalent
luminaire lumen output comparisons between legacy and LED products, maintenance costs, and
the expected lifespan of the products.
• Target illumination levels are based upon current Illuminating Engineering Society (IES)
published “Recommended Practice” (RP) documents that set light level guidelines for outdoors
spaces, and other industry standards for all target illuminance levels.
• There is a growing body of literature that points to blue-rich light at night is disturbing circadian
function for people and animals. Though the results are not fully conclusive, the Statewide
CASE Team has developed proposed standards levels based on “warmer” correlated color
temperatures (CCTs) (3000K) to align with a growing number of specifications for lower CCTs.
Additionally, a number of stakeholders expressed interest in ensuring the new LPAs can be met
with 3000K luminaires; the Statewide CASE Team took this into consideration as well when
developing the new LPAs.
• In addition to basing proposed standards levels based on 3000K luminaires, the Statewide
CASE Team has developed a multiplier for general hardscape that allows the use of narrow
band, 580 nanometers (nm) or greater, light sources. These narrow band spectrum light sources
3 http://www.energy.ca.gov/title24/2016standards/prerulemaking/documents/2014-06-
24_workshop/final_case_reports/2016_T24_CASE_Report-Outdoor_LPA-Dec_2014-V3.pdf
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 80
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 3
have a narrow spectrum band (e.g., only include red light), but they are less efficacious than
3000K luminaires and are only used in environmentally sensitive areas such as sea turtle nesting
sites and observatories. The development of this multiplier was based on needs described by
stakeholders. The Statewide CASE Team reached out to the International Dark-Sky Association
(IDA) to gather additional information and received a similar sentiment describing a need for
spectral tuning for environmentally sensitive areas. In the past, low pressure sodium lamps were
the only available option for environmentally sensitive areas, but advances in technology are
allowing for specific spectral outputs to be used. IDA suggested that allowing the use of narrow
band spectrum light sources will be more beneficial than simply allowing warm or “amber”
light sources since new research is showing that different narrow bands of light are beneficial to
different species. IDA also suggested the multiplier will encourage more research into which
specific spectral values will be most beneficial to different sensitive species.
The proposed changes to the outdoor LPAs are based upon the following underlying market factors:
• The Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 and the California Appliance Efficiency
Standards (Title 20) requirements for metal halide lamp luminaires (effective 2015) have driven
innovation. Manufacturers are discontinuing probe start metal halide products and less-efficient
pulse start metal halide products and increasing production of high-efficacy LED products.
• The efficacies for LED luminaires used in outdoor applications have increased in the past three
years.
• The cost of LED luminaires for outdoor lighting has dropped significantly.
• There is a growing consensus that the illuminance requirements for outdoor hardscapes
(covered by the requirements in Title 24, Part 6 Table 140.7-A) in IES RP-20-14 may be higher
than needed, and they do not account for lighting zones appropriately. Changes to RP-20-14 are
currently being considered. If the RP-20 requirements are updated before the 2019 Standards
are adopted, the LPA values for Table 140.7-A can be modified to align with the revised RP-20
recommendation. However, the current RP-20-14 was used to develop the LPAs presented in
this report.
To support the RP-20 recommended practice development process, the Virginia Tech Transportation
Institute is conducting a critical task analysis to determine what is necessary for vehicles and pedestrians
to navigate safely in parking lots. The research will determine luminance contrast ratios and spectral
analysis required for safe navigation in parking lots. The goal is for the research to be completed in time
to inform the RP-20 recommended practice. The Statewide CASE Team is hopeful that the final RP-20
recommended practice will be informed by Virginia Tech’s research and the RP-20 recommended
practice will be finalized in time to make adjustments, as appropriate, to the proposed Title 24, Part 6
LPA requirements before the 2019 Standards are adopted in May 2018.
2.2 Measure History
Almost all of the LPAs in Table 140.7-B for specific applications (applications other than hardscape)
have not been updated since the 2008 Title 24, Part 6 code cycle. With 11 years of progress in light
source and luminaire efficacy, Table 140.7-B is ready for dramatic decreases in LPAs.
The LPAs in Table 140.7-A for hardscape illumination were updated for the 2016 Standards, using light
levels based on the IES RP-20-14. Since the last code cycle, the efficacies for LEDs used for hardscape
illumination have increased while the cost for LEDs has dropped (Energy 2016) (U.S. Department of
Energy 2016). The United States Department of Energy (DOE) estimates that LED prices for outdoor
applications (area and roadways, parking lots, garages, and building exteriors) will drop by
approximately 36 percent from 2016 to 2020 (U.S. Department of Energy 2016). These changes
represent potential additional energy savings for hardscape illumination.
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 81
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 4
2.3 Summary of Proposed Changes to Code Documents
The sections below provide a summary of how each Title 24, Part 6 documents will be modified by the
proposed change. See Section 7 of this report for detailed proposed revisions to code language.
2.3.1 Standards Change Summary
This proposal will modify the following sections of the Building Energy Efficiency Standards as shown
below. See Section 7.1 of this report for the detailed proposed revisions to the code language.
SECTION 100.1 – DEFINITIONS AND RULES OF CONSTRUCTION
Narrow Band Spectrum: is a limited range of wavelengths (nm) concentric to a dominant peak
wavelength in the visible spectrum. The limited range of wavelengths shall be within 20 nm on either
side of the peak wavelength at 50 percent of the peak wavelength’s relative spectral power, and within
75 nm on either side of the peak wavelength at 10 percent of the peak wavelength’s relative spectral
power.
SECTION 130.2(b) – OUTDOOR LIGHTING CONTROLS AND EQUIPMENT
(b): The language in this section removes ambiguous language that guides the application of
backlight/uplight/glare (BUG) ratings per IES RP-15-11 Addendum A to outdoor luminaires and
modifies language so BUG rating requirement now apply to lower-wattage outdoor luminaires.
SECTION 140.7 – REQUIREMENTS FOR OUTDOOR LIGHTING
Table 140.7-A: This table includes modified LPA values and adds separate columns for asphalt and
concrete for Lighting Zone (LZ 2) and 3. The values for concrete used to exist in a footnote, but have
now been added to the table itself. Footnote 2 has been edited appropriately. Footnote 3 is a multiplier to
be used for narrow band spectrum light sources where required by local and state laws. The multiplier
doubles the LPA values to allow the use of the less efficacious narrow band spectrum light sources
where required for environmentally sensitive areas – observatories and habitats for sensitive nocturnal
animals.
Table 140.7-B: This table includes modified LPA values. During the 2016 code cycle, lower LPAs for
this table were rejected due to cost-effectiveness concerns (with a few exceptions). The updated LPA
values are expected to reduce nighttime electricity use and replace pulse-start metal halide (PSMH) and
fluorescent sources with LED as the light source used for LPA calculations. New lower LPAs are
proposed for some applications that were accepted in the 2016 code cycle as well, since the efficacy of
LED products for outdoor applications improved.
2.3.2 Reference Appendices Change Summary
The proposed code change is not expected to modify the appendices of the standards.
2.3.3 Alternative Calculation Method (ACM) Reference Manual Change Summary
The proposed code change is not expected to modify the Nonresidential ACM Reference Manuals.
2.3.4 Compliance Manual Change Summary
The proposed code change requires revisions to Section 6 of the Nonresidential Compliance Manual. If
the proposal is accepted, the Energy Commission will need to update the values in the examples and
tables representing General Hardscape LPAs and Specific Application LPAs.
2.3.5 Compliance Documents Change Summary
Compliance document NRCC-LTO-03-E will need to be revised to account for different LPAs between
asphalt and concrete for Table 140.7-A General Hardscape.
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 82
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 5
2.4 Regulatory Context
2.4.1 Existing Title 24, Part 6 Standards
Exterior lighting power is already regulated in the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-
Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) 90.1, ASHRAE 189.1, and Title 24, Part 6. This code change
increases stringency of existing exterior LPAs in Title 24, Part 6.
2.4.2 Relationship to Other Title 24 Requirements
No other portions of Title 24, Part 6 are expected to be directly affected by this code change. There is
some overlap with the Title 24, Part 6 code change proposal for outdoor lighting controls, but only
because both deal with exterior lighting. The potential savings associated with the reduction of lighting
power allowances is impacted by the improvements to controls requirements.
2.4.3 Relationship to State or Federal Laws
There are existing Title 20 and federal standards for outdoor lighting products. Specifically, the
Statewide CASE Team has considered the existing Title 20 and federal standards related to efficiencies
for metal halide luminaires and the impact of these standards on efficacy trends for the baseline outdoor
lighting products. However, this proposal changes allowable outdoor lighting power levels for specific
area types and does not set efficiency requirements for individual lighting products.
2.4.4 Relationship to Industry Standards
The proposed LPAs were developed with IES recommended light levels used as the minimum for
modeling. IES is currently considering updates to its lighting recommendations in RP-20-14 (parking lot
and garage lighting), thus the proposed measure will need to take the new illumination levels into
consideration if adopted. The RP-20 revision adoption may come too late for 2019 Title 24, Part 6 to
consider. In the meantime, this measure uses the current RP-20-14 levels for modeling the proposed
LPAs.
2.5 Compliance and Enforcement
The Statewide CASE Team collected input during the stakeholder outreach process on what compliance
and enforcement issues may be associated with these measures. This proposed code change is not
expected to update the compliance documents for outdoor lighting LPAs or the compliance methods.
The proposed code change makes an adjustment to existing requirements. The Statewide CASE Team
does not expect there to be any compliance and enforcement challenges or issues. The Statewide CASE
Team has interviewed stakeholders to identify potential barriers to code compliance and enforcement.
This proposed code change is expected to update the compliance document NRCC-LTO-03-E to
account for different LPAs between asphalt and concrete for Table 140.7-A General Hardscape. The
proposed code change is not expected to change the compliance methods. The proposed code change
makes an adjustment to existing requirements. The Statewide CASE Team does not expect there to be
any compliance and enforcement challenges or issues. The Statewide CASE Team has interviewed
stakeholders to identify potential barriers to code compliance and enforcement. Appendix B presents a
detailed description of how the proposed code changes could impact various market actors.
3. M ARKET A NALYSIS
The Statewide CASE Team performed a market analysis with the goals of identifying current
technology availability, current product availability, and market trends. The Statewide CASE Team
considered how the proposed standard may impact the market in general and individual market actors.
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 83
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 6
The Statewide CASE Team gathered information about the incremental cost of complying with the
proposed lower LPAs. Estimates of market size and measure applicability were identified through
research and outreach with stakeholders including utility program staff, Energy Commission staff, and a
wide range of industry representatives who were invited to participate in utility-sponsored stakeholder
meetings held on September 8, 2016, March 30, 2017, and June 22, 2017. The Statewide CASE Team
also used an online survey to help inform the proposal; see Appendix J for more information on the
online stakeholder survey.
3.1 Market Structure
According to a 2014 DOE report, LEDs accounted for nine percent of the outdoor lighting market in
2013. DOE forecasted that LEDs will represent 75 percent of all outdoor lighting sales by 2020 and
virtually all outdoor lighting sales by 2025 (Navigant Consulting 2014). Many manufacturers are
discontinuing legacy products, especially pulse start metal halide (PSMH) and compact fluorescent
lamp (CFL) products. Lithonia, Hubbell, and Eaton are examples of major manufacturers that
historically produced legacy products (HID and fluorescent), but have shifted more towards LED
product offerings. Many other manufacturers also have been involved in this transition, including the
emergence and growth of companies that only produce LED products, such as Cree and Evluma. There
are now thousands of different LED product types available to supply dozens, if not hundreds of
different application needs. Publicly available product listings, such as the Department of Energy (DOE)
Lighting Facts program, the DesignLights Consortium’s Qualified Product Lists, and others,
demonstrate wide product availability.
3.2 Technical Feasibility, Market Availability, and Current
Practices
The market is heading towards more efficient luminaires due to the rapid improvement of LEDs and the
continued reduction in costs. LEDs continue to be adopted and are replacing other lighting technologies.
LED is quickly becoming the standard for many applications, so there are no challenges expected in
terms of technical feasibility or market availability as a result of the proposed measure.
3.3 Market Impacts and Economic Assessments
3.3.1 Impact on Builders
The Statewide CASE Team does not expect that builders will be adversely impacted by a single
proposed code change or from the sum of the proposed changes to Title 24, Part 6. Builders could be
impacted by a shift in demand for new buildings and by construction costs, but the Building Energy
Efficiency Standards are not considered a major factor in projected growth. Demand for new buildings
is driven more by factors such as the overall health of the economy and population growth than the cost
of construction. The cost of complying with Title 24, Part 6 requirements represents a very small portion
of the construction process and total building value. Increasing the building cost by a fraction of a
percent is not expected to have a significant impact on demand for new buildings or the builders’
profits.
While some training and education can help ensure the workforce, including designers and those
working in construction trades, know how to comply with the proposed requirements, workforce
training is not unique to the building industry, and is common in many fields associated with the
production of goods and services. Costs associated with workforce training are typically accounted for
in long-term financial planning and spread out across the unit price of many units as to avoid price
spikes when changes in designs and/or processes are implemented.
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 84
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 7
However, because the market is experiencing a rapid shift towards LEDs, builders are already familiar
with the technology. Since the proposed code change is simply increasing the stringency of current
regulations, builders will not need to learn any new processes or compliance methods.
3.3.2 Impact on Building Designers and Energy Consultants
Adjusting design practices to comply with changing building codes practices is within the normal
practices of building designers. Building codes (including the California Building code and model
national building codes published by the International Code Council, the International Association of
Plumbing and Mechanical Officials and ASHRAE 90.1) are typically updated on three-year revision
cycles. As discussed in Section 3.3.1, all market actors should (and do) plan for training and education
that may be required to adjusting design practices to accommodate compliance with new building codes.
As a whole, the measures the Statewide CASE Team is proposing for the 2019 code cycle aim to
provide designers and energy consultants with opportunities to comply with code requirements in
multiple ways, thereby providing flexibility in how requirements can be met.
Building designers will need to comply with this code change by ensuring new outdoor lighting systems
meet the new LPA requirements. This will not have a large impact on building designers since the
market is quickly shifting to higher efficacy LEDs and many manufacturers are discontinuing legacy
products. Designers may need to adapt outdated designs to meet lower LPAs without compromising
lighting quality for the future occupants, but the proposed modifications do not limit design options
beyond lower LPAs. There should be ample options to design lighting systems that provide the
appropriate quality lighting for the application or task.
3.3.3 Impact on Occupational Safety and Health
The proposed code change does not alter any existing federal, state, or local regulations pertaining to
safety and health, including rules enforced by the California Division of Occupational Safety and
Health. All existing health and safety rules will remain in place. Complying with the proposed code
change is not anticipated to have adverse impacts on the safety or health of occupants or those involved
with the construction, commissioning, and maintenance of buildings or surrounding outdoor areas.
3.3.4 Impact on Building Owners and Occupants
Building owners and occupants will benefit from lower energy bills. As discussed in Section 3.4.1,
when building occupants save on energy bills, they tend to spend it elsewhere in the economy thereby
creating jobs and economic growth for the California economy.
Occupants and building owners will benefit from reduced maintenance time and costs since LEDs have
a substantially longer product lifetime over legacy products. Additionally, the proposed code change
allows the use of warm color temperature (3000K) luminaires which reduces occupants’ exposure to
blue light at night. As described in Section 2.1, there is growing evidence that suggests that exposure to
blue light at night can have detrimental effects on both people and animals.
3.3.5 Impact on Building Component Retailers (Including Manufacturers and Distributors)
The Statewide CASE Team expects LED manufacturers to benefit from increased demand for high
efficacy products and experience decreased demand for lower-efficacy legacy products. This aligns with
broader market trends. The Statewide CASE Team has noted that many manufacturers are already
discontinuing production of legacy products.
3.3.6 Impact on Building Inspectors
The proposed code change is unlikely to affect building inspectors since only the stringency of existing
requirements is changing.
3.3.7 Impact on Statewide Employment
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 85
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 8
Section 3.4.1 discusses statewide job creation from the energy efficiency sector in general, including
updates to Title 24, Part 6. These changes have negligible impact on employment. Installation labor is
approximately the same for both legacy and LED light sources.
3.4 Economic Impacts
The estimated impacts that the proposed code change will have on California’s economy are discussed
below.
3.4.1 Creation or Elimination of Jobs
In 2015, California’s building energy efficiency industry employed more than 321,000 workers who
worked at least part time or a fraction of their time on activities related to building efficiency.
Employment in the building energy efficiency industry grew six percent between 2014 and 2015 while
the overall statewide employment grew three percent (BW Research Partnership 2016). Lawrence
Berkeley National Laboratory’s report titled Energy Efficiency Services Sector: Workforce Size and
Expectations for Growth (2010) provides details on the types of jobs in the energy efficiency sector that
are likely to be supported by revisions to building codes.
Building codes that reduce energy consumption provide jobs through direct employment, indirect
employment, and induced employment.4 Title 24, Part 6 creates jobs in all three categories with a
significant amount attributed to induced employment, which accounts for the expenditure-induced
effects in the general economy due to the economic activity and spending of direct and indirect
employees (e.g., non-industry jobs created such as teachers, grocery store clerks, and postal workers). A
large portion of the induced jobs from energy efficiency are the jobs created by the energy cost savings
due to the energy efficiency measures. Wei, Patadia, and Kammen (2010) estimate that energy
efficiency creates 0.17 to 0.59 net job-years5 per GWh saved. By comparison, they estimate that the coal
and natural gas industries create 0.11 net job-years per GWh produced. Using the mid-point for the
energy efficiency range (0.38 net job-years per GWh saved) and estimates that this proposed code
change will result in a statewide first-year savings of 118 GWh, this measure will result in
approximately 45 jobs created in the first year. See Section 6.1 for statewide savings estimates.
3.4.2 Creation or Elimination of Businesses in California
There are approximately 43,000 businesses that play a role in California’s advanced energy economy
(BW Research Partnership 2016). California’s clean economy grew ten times more than the total state
economy between 2002 and 2012 (20 percent compared to two percent). The energy efficiency industry,
which is driven in part by recurrent updates to the building code, is the largest component of the core
clean economy (Ettenson and Heavey 2015). Adopting cost-effective code changes for the 2019 Title
24, Part 6 code cycle will help maintain the energy efficiency industry.
Table 3 lists industries that will likely benefit from the proposed code change classified by their North
American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Code.
4 The definitions of direct, indirect, and induced jobs vary widely by study. Wei et al (2010) describes the definitions and usage
of these categories as follows: “Direct employment includes those jobs created in the design, manufacturing, delivery,
construction/installation, project management and operation and maintenance of the different components of the technology, or
power plant, under consideration. Indirect employment refers to the ‘‘supplier effect’’ of upstream and downstream suppliers.
For example, the task of installing wind turbines is a direct job, whereas manufacturing the steel that is used to build the wind
turbine is an indirect job. Induced employment accounts for the expenditure-induced effects in the general economy due to the
economic activity and spending of direct and indirect employees, e.g., non industry jobs created such as teachers, grocery store
clerks, and postal workers.”
5 One job-year (or ‘‘full-time equivalent’’ FTE job) is full time employment for one person for a duration of 1 year.
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 86
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 9
Table 3: Industries Receiving Energy Efficiency Related Investment, by North American Industry
Classification System (NAICS) Code
Industry NAICS Code
Nonresidential Building Construction 2362
Electrical Contractors 23821
Manufacturing 32412
Other Nonmetallic Mineral Product Manufacturing 3279
Industrial Machinery Manufacturing 3332
Electric Lighting Equipment Manufacturing 3351
Engineering Services 541330
Building Inspection Services 541350
Advertising and Related Services 5418
Commercial & Industrial Machinery & Equip. (exc. Auto. & Electronic) Repair & Maint. 811310
The rapid expansion of LED technology has been disruptive to the status quo in the lighting industry.
Many new market entrants into the industry have been from the semiconductor and electronics industry.
Some of the new businesses that are in California include:
• LEDtronics
• Feit Electric
• Greenshine
• Lunera
Many existing lighting manufacturers are adapting to this change in the market by discontinuing legacy
products and switching to LED products (or increasing LED product production). National Electrical
Manufacturers Association (NEMA) data illustrates the rapid growth of LED sales and stagnation and
decline in legacy product sales and market penetration (Association 2017). The Statewide CASE Team
spoke with five major manufacturers and collected the following information:
• Three of the manufacturers have discontinued some or most of their metal halide luminaires.
• Three of the manufacturers have discontinued some of their CFL luminaires.
3.4.3 Competitive Advantages or Disadvantages for Businesses in California
In 2014, California’s electricity statewide costs were 1.7 percent of the state’s gross domestic product
(GPD) while electricity costs in the rest of the United States were 2.4 percent of GDP (Thornberg,
Chong and Fowler 2016). As a result of spending a smaller portion of overall GDP on electricity relative
to other states, Californians and California businesses save billions of dollars in energy costs per year
relative to businesses located elsewhere. Money saved on energy costs can otherwise be invested, which
provides California businesses with an advantage that will only be strengthened by the adoption of the
proposed code changes that impact nonresidential buildings.
Reduced LPAs encourage the use of new innovative technologies. This is an advantage for nimble
innovative companies that tend to congregate in California.
3.4.4 Increase or Decrease of Investments in the State of California
The proposed changes to the building code are not expected to impact investments in California on a
macroeconomic scale, nor are they expected to affect investments by individual firms. The allocation of
resources for the production of goods in California is not expected to change as a result of this proposal.
3.4.5 Effects on the State General Fund, State Special Funds, and Local Governments
The proposed code changes are not expected to have a significant impact on the California’s General
Fund, any state special funds, or local government funds. Revenue to these funds comes from taxes
levied. The most relevant taxes to consider for this proposed code change are: personal income taxes,
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 87
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 10
corporation taxes, sales and use taxes, and property taxes. The proposed changes for the 2019 Title 24,
Part 6 Standards are not expected to result in noteworthy changes to personal or corporate income, so
the revenue from personal income taxes or corporate taxes is not expected to change. As discussed,
reductions in energy expenditures are expected to increase discretionary income. State and local sales
tax revenues may increase if building occupants spend additional discretionary income on taxable items.
Although logic indicates there may be changes to sales tax revenue, the impacts that are directly related
to revisions to Title 24, Part 6 have not been quantified. Finally, revenue generated from property taxes
is directly linked to the value of the property, which is usually linked to the purchase price of the
property. The proposed changes will increase construction costs. As discussed in Section 3.3.1,
however, there is no statistical evidence that Title 24, Part 6 drives construction costs or that
construction costs have a significant impact on building price. Since compliance with Title 24, Part 6
does not have a clear impact on purchase price, it can follow that Title 24, Part 6 cannot be shown to
impact revenues from property taxes.
This proposal has the net effect of increasing the wealth of the State of California as the increased cost
of construction is offset by reduced electricity consumption of lighting systems. Overall this proposal
has a B/C ratio of 36.6:1. As a result, 37 times more energy cost savings are returned to California than
would be expended, including the cost of capital. As a result, everything else being equal, companies are
more profitable, which results in more taxes being paid to state and local government.
3.4.5.1 Cost of Enforcement
Cost to the State
State government already has budget for code development, education, and compliance enforcement.
While state government will be allocating resources to update the Title 24, Part 6 Standards, including
updating education and compliance materials and responding to questions about the revised
requirements, these activities are already covered by existing state budgets. The costs to state
government are small when compared to the overall costs savings and policy benefits associated with
the code change proposals. The proposed code change will impact state buildings in terms of new
construction and alterations/additions. However, the impacts will be minimal since the proposed code
change only increases stringency of existing requirements, and has been found to be cost-effective.
This proposal relies on the same LPA structure that has been in Title 24, Part 6 for many code cycles;
the same tables are used but with updated LPA values. As a result, no additional costs are expected to be
incurred to the state government.
Cost to Local Governments
All revisions to Title 24, Part 6 will result in changes to compliance determinations. Local governments
will need to train building department staff on the revised Title 2, Part 6 Standards. While this re-
training is an expense to local governments, it is not a new cost associated with the 2019 code change
cycle. The building code is updated on a triennial basis, and local governments plan and budget for
retraining every time the code is updated. There are numerous resources available to local governments
to support compliance training that can help mitigate the cost of retraining, including tools, training and
resources provided by the IOU codes and standards program (such as Energy Code Ace). As noted in
Section 2.5 and Appendix B, the Statewide CASE Team considered how the proposed code change
might impact various market actors involved in the compliance and enforcement process and aimed to
minimize negative impacts on local governments.
Since this proposal relies on the same LPA tables and structure that has been in Title 24, Part 6 for many
code cycles, the Statewide CASE Team does not expect any additional costs to local government.
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 88
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 11
3.4.6 Impacts on Specific Persons
The proposed changes to Title 24, Part 6 are not expected to have a differential impact on any groups
relative to the state population as a whole, including migrant workers, commuters or persons by age,
race or religion. Tenants will typically benefit from lower energy bills if they pay energy bills directly.
These savings should more than offset any capital costs passed-through from landlords. Renters who do
not pay directly for energy costs may see some of the net savings depending on if and how landlords
account for energy cost when determining rent prices.
The changes to the LPA requirements apply across all occupancies. There is no group that will be
affected disproportionately.
4. E NERGY S AVINGS
4.1 Key Assumptions for Energy Savings Analysis
The Statewide CASE Team used a similar approach for performing the energy savings analysis that was
used in the 2016 Title 24, Part 6 code cycle. The key assumptions and how they are used are described
below.
The Statewide CASE Team calculated per-unit impacts and statewide impacts associated with both new
construction and alterations by comparing energy use of outdoor lighting that is minimally compliant
with the 2016 Title 24, Part 6 Standards to the proposed requirements for the 2019 Title 24, Part 6
Standards. Impacts for General Hardscapes and Specific Applications were considered.
The analysis for General Hardscapes defined effective wattage allowances (eWA) for the 2019 proposal
using 3000K LED luminaires that are widely available today and commonly used. Wattage allowances
were established for example sites that represent a reasonable cross-section of what is likely to be
installed in the state during the 2019 code cycle. The effective wattage allowance values combine the
Initial Wattage Allowance, the Area Wattage Allowance, and the Linear Wattage Allowance into a
single value (Lighting Power Allowance also known as the effective Area Wattage Allowance) based on
the size, shape, and type of the area in question. Table 4 presents the details of the prototype buildings
used in the analysis for developing new LPAs for General Hardscape.
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 89
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 12
Table 4: Prototype Buildings Used for Energy, Demand, Cost, and Environmental Impacts
Analysis for General Hardscape
Prototype
ID
Occupancy Type
(Residential, Retail,
Office, etc.)
Hardscape
Area
(ft2)
Hardscape
Perimeter
(ft)
Perimeter
to Area
(%)
Notes
Prototype A Office/Retail 501,626 6,794 1.4% Long skinny site, big
building
Prototype B Retail 471,726 5,131 1.1% Square site, irregular
building
Prototype C Retail 42,828 3,052 7.1% Irregular site, campus
buildings
Prototype D Retail 28,500 960 3.4% Long skinny site, small
building
Prototype E Retail/Office/Industrial 21,000 760 3.6% Square site, small square
building
Prototype F Retail/Office/Industrial 61,798 1,940 3.1% Irregular site, long square
building
Prototype G Retail/Office/Industrial 21,797 1,408 6.5% Long skinny site,
irregular building
Prototype H Retail/Office/Industrial 11,040 1,042 9.4% Square site, large square
building
Prototype J Retail/Office/Industrial 34,735 2,593 7.5% Irregular site, large
irregular building
Prototype K Parking 250,000 2,000 0.8% Ideal square site
The analysis for the Specific Applications defined LPA in a similar way. That is, using readily available
LED luminaires in example layouts that represent a reasonable cross-section of designs that are likely to
be installed during the 2019 code cycle. The LPA values for Specific Applications characterize wattage
allowance either in terms per square foot, per linear foot, or per area, depending on the application.
For Specific Applications, the 2016 standards allow the use of lower efficacy “legacy” technologies
such as fluorescent, HID, and others. Savings were achieved by developing models with equivalent
maintained luminaire lumens models for the proposed LPAs using higher efficacy 3000K LED
luminaires.
A spreadsheet-based analysis was used to take into account a variety of variables including:
• Reductions in LPA values within Tables 140.7 A & B.
• Impacted area of LPA reduction (for situations where the area is not explicitly defined).
• Occupancy and use profiles for various outdoor applications.
• Prototype sites employed for effective wattage/square foot reduction calculations.
The analysis was completed using the outdoor lighting application types defined in the 2016 ACM
Reference Manual. Duty cycles were based on energy use curves defined in the 2016 ACM Reference
Manual and the Statewide CASE Team’s industry knowledge of typical hours of operation for
nonresidential buildings.
The General Hardscape LPA values derived from example site layouts were validated by applying the
proposed LPA values to three real site designs. Using the new LPA values on real designs confirmed
that it is technically feasible and cost effective to design to the new LPAs using technology that is
readily available today. The Statewide CASE Team developed a basic lighting layout to use with the
three real sites to conduct cost-effectiveness calculations. This is a more detailed calculation of the
lighting design necessary to meet the design criteria, but this analysis allowed the CASE Team to
develop more detailed cost estimates and design details for the CASE analysis.
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 90
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 13
Key considerations for the three real sites considered in the general hardscape maintained light level
analyses are the expected lumen maintenance of the outdoor luminaires and the appropriate light loss
factors. The rated lifetime of LED luminaires is typically defined as the time it takes the light output to
drop to 70 percent of the initial output (referred to as L70). The Statewide CASE Team applied the
average L70 value at 60,000 hours of the area luminaires studied since this was the basis of the 2016
LPA CASE Report analysis. The 2016 LPA CASE Report analysis used a 70 percent lumen
maintenance value at 60,000 hours. Since the 2016 analysis was completed, LED technology has
advanced significantly. For the analysis of the proposed 2019 requirements, the Statewide CASE Team
assumed a lumen maintenance of 90 percent at 60,000 hours for all general hardscape luminaires. This
means that lower wattage luminaires could be modeled that would still meet design requirements with
maintained lumens at 60,000 hours, resulting in more energy savings relative to the 2016 Standards.
Appendix F provides data on the lumen maintenance values at 60,000 hours for the luminaires used in
the General Hardscape savings models.
The 2016 LPA CASE Report assumed a dirt depreciation factor of 0.8. In the current analysis, the
Statewide CASE Team assumed a luminaire dirt depreciation factor of 0.9. The Statewide CASE Team
believes 0.9 to be industry standard practice based on current technology. Current fully shielded
luminaire designs reduce the amount of rain or dust accumulation on the light emitting surfaces,
improving luminaire dirt depreciation factors. This further increases maintained lumens and reduces
initial lighting power. The total light loss factor of 0.81 combines both the lumen maintenance factor of
0.9 and luminaire dirt deprecation factor of 0.9.
Another consideration affecting the energy savings analysis is luminaire light distribution. Historically,
larger parking lots were modeled using poles with four luminaire heads to meet IES RP-20-14
recommended light levels, but improved luminaire optical designs enabled the use of two luminaire
heads per pole in some of the proposed site models. Distribution patterns have been improved by using
LED luminaires with improved optics and a wider offering of lumen packages; these products are
available from a variety of manufacturers including Acuity, Philips Lighting, Cree, and WE-EF. While
no improvement to luminaire efficacy was assumed in the General Hardscape model, improved optical
design and a greater offering of lumen packages enables a more effective use of light, less over-lighting,
fewer heads, and lower wattage.
4.2 Energy Savings Methodology
To assess the energy, demand, and energy cost impacts, the Statewide CASE Team compared design
practices associated with installations that are minimally compliant with the 2016 Standards to design
practices that would comply with the proposed requirements. There is an existing Title 24, Part 6
standard that covers the building system in question, so the existing conditions assume a building
complies with the 2016 Title 24, Part 6 Standards.
The proposed conditions are defined as the design conditions that will comply with the proposed code
change. Specifically, the proposed code change will reduce the LPAs for nonresidential outdoor lighting
based on meeting the same (or currently relevant) design criteria using currently available LED
luminaires.
This measure only applies to outdoor lighting applications, so the Energy Commission building
prototypes were not applicable. Instead, the Statewide CASE Team used the same outdoor lighting area
prototypes used to evaluate LPA requirements that were updated for the 2016 code cycle: nine site plan
prototypes to represent a variety of site configurations that account for both the building and hardscape
footprint, which vary from an efficient (square) site with a simple building footprint and hardscape
layout to a more complex site with less ideal conditions. These prototypes enabled the Statewide CASE
Team to compare LPA values in practical lighting layout conditions that represent a reasonable
spectrum of conditions that may be encountered in actual site designs.
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 91
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 14
The Statewide CASE Team used real designs to develop the new LPAs for General Hardscape.
Specifically, small, medium, and large parking lot designs were used. The parking lot designs utilized a
variety of pole heights and luminaire distributions that meet 2016 Title 24 requirements, CALGreen,
and IES RP-20-14 lighting recommendations. The selected luminaires for the proposed 2019 Standards
were all 3000K LED luminaires with better lumen maintenance and overall improved light loss factors,
along with improved optical distributions and more lumen packages than the LED luminaires used for
the 2016 Standards. Even though luminaires for the 2016 Standards had the same efficacy (lumen per
watt or LPW) as those used in the analysis for the proposed 2019 Standards, the improved luminaire dirt
depreciation factors, better lumen maintenance, improved optical distributions, and more available
lumen packages, allowed less wattage to be used to achieve the recommended lighting levels. The
standard design practice is to design lighting layouts based on the maintained light output of the
luminaire, not initial lighting levels. Thus, energy savings are achieved due to lower initial wattage and
lumen output, but systems will be designed to provide the same light levels at 60,000 hours. Overall, the
proposed LPAs are approximately 30 percent lower than the 2016 LPAs while maintaining 60,000-hour
design light levels. Please see Appendix F for additional details.
The Specific Applications legacy luminaires (i.e., luminaries used to establish the 2016 LPAs)
maintained lumen outputs were compared to equivalent LED luminaire maintained lumen outputs to
confirm that typical design practices will be unchanged with LED luminaires. The lumen output
comparisons demonstrated that the proposed LPAs can be achieved independent of the site layout.
These specific applications calculations reflect the efficacy improvements from legacy source types to
current LED luminaires.
The Statewide CASE Team estimated the statewide energy impacts by first calculating the per-unit
savings for each application (General Hardscape and Specific Applications), and then extrapolating the
per-unit impacts to the entire state using estimates of statewide square footage of each type of outdoor
hardscape area that will be impacted by the proposed requirements. The total statewide hardscape area
was derived starting with the building construction forecasts that the Energy Commission provided, then
applying assumptions about the type and size of hardscaped areas that are associated with typical
nonresidential construction of different building types. See Appendix A, Appendix H, and Appendix I
for more details.
The lighting measures evaluated in this CASE Report will have energy savings that are only secondarily
impacted by climate. Installed wattage and hours of operation have significantly more impact on energy
savings than climate. These light sources are outdoors, so there are no interaction effects with HVAC.
As a result, the cost-effectiveness of this measure is deemed to be independent of climate zone.
Energy savings, energy cost savings, and peak demand reductions were calculated using a TDV (Time
Dependent Valuation) methodology. Both General Hardscape and Specific Applications use operating
hours that include the impact of outdoor lighting controls. See Appendix D for more details.
4.3 Per-Unit Energy Impacts Results
The per-unit first-year energy savings are presented in Table 5 through Table 9. See Section 6.1 of this
report for estimated statewide savings from additions and alterations. The per unit energy savings
estimates do not take naturally occurring market adoption or compliance rates into account. The
Statewide CASE Team calculated per-unit savings for LZ 4 for both General Hardscape and Specific
Applications (Table 5 and Table 9). However, California currently does not have any LZ 4 areas. First-
year statewide savings (Section 5) do not include any savings from LZ 4 to reflect this.
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 92
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 15
Table 5: First-Year Energy Impacts Per-Unit for General Hardscape
General
Hardscape
Per-Unit First-Year Savingsa
Units Electricity
Savingsb (kWh/yr)
Demand Savings
(kW)
Natural Gas
Savings
(therms/yr)
Lighting Zone 1 Per Square Foot 0.03 0.00 N/A
Lighting Zone 2 Per Square Foot 0.10 0.00 N/A
Lighting Zone 3 Per Square Foot 0.11 0.00 N/A
Lighting Zone 4 Per Square Foot 0.15 0.00 N/A
a. Savings from one unit for the first year the site is in operation.
b. Site electricity savings, does not include TDV or electricity savings.
Table 6: First-Year Energy Impacts Per-Unit – Specific Applications Lighting Zone 1
Lighting
Application
Per-Unit First-Year Savingsa
Units Electricity
Savingsb (kWh/yr)
Demand Savings
(kW)
Natural Gas
Savings
(therms/yr)
Building Entrances Each 28.17 0.00 N/A
Primary Entrances Each 117.37 0.00 N/A
Drive Up Windows Each 76.70 0.00 N/A
Vehicle Service
Uncovered Fuel
Dispenser
Each Pump Face 304.85 0.01 N/A
ATM Machine Each 704.20 0.01 N/A
Outdoor Sales
Frontage Per Linear Foot No Allowance N/A N/A
Hardscape
Ornamental
Lighting
Per Square Foot No Allowance N/A N/A
Building Facades Per Square Foot No Allowance N/A N/A
Outdoor Sales Lots Per Square Foot 0.45 0.00 N/A
Vehicle Service
Station Hardscape Per Square Foot 0.04 0.00 N/A
Vehicle Service
Station Canopies Per Square Foot 1.30 0.00 N/A
Sales Canopies Per Square Foot No Allowance N/A N/A
Non-sales Canopies Per Square Foot 0.04 0.00 N/A
Guard Stations Per Square Foot 0.34 0.00 N/A
Student Pick-
up/Drop-off Zone Per Square Foot No Allowance N/A N/A
Outdoor Dining Per Square Foot 0.02 0.00 N/A
Special Security
Lighting for Retail Per Square Foot 0.01 0.00 N/A
a. Savings from one unit for the first year the site is in operation.
b. Site electricity savings, does not include TDV or electricity savings.
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 93
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 16
Table 7: First-Year Energy Impacts Per-Unit – Specific Applications Lighting Zone 2
Lighting
Application
Per-Unit First-Year Savingsa
Units Electricity
Savingsb (kWh/yr)
Demand Savings
(kW)
Natural Gas
Savings
(therms/yr)
Building Entrances Each 46.95 0.00 N/A
Primary Entrances Each 187.79 0.00 N/A
Drive Up Windows Each 143.81 0.00 N/A
Vehicle Service
Uncovered Fuel
Dispenser
Each Pump Face 459.62 0.01 N/A
ATM Machine Each 704.20 0.01 N/A
Outdoor Sales
Frontage Per Linear Foot 22.22 0.00 N/A
Hardscape
Ornamental
Lighting
Per Square Foot 0.06 0.00 N/A
Building Facades Per Square Foot 0.26 0.00 N/A
Outdoor Sales Lots Per Square Foot 1.49 0.00 N/A
Vehicle Service
Station Hardscape Per Square Foot 0.39 0.00 N/A
Vehicle Service
Station Canopies Per Square Foot 2.55 0.00 N/A
Sales Canopies Per Square Foot 0.59 0.00 N/A
Non-sales Canopies Per Square Foot 0.11 0.00 N/A
Guard Stations Per Square Foot 0.84 0.00 N/A
Student Pick-
up/Drop-off Zone Per Square Foot 0.10 0.00 N/A
Outdoor Dining Per Square Foot 0.20 0.00 N/A
Special Security
Lighting for Retail Per Square Foot 0.02 0.00 N/A
a. Savings from one unit for the first year the site is in operation.
b. Site electricity savings, does not include TDV or electricity savings.
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 94
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 17
Table 8: First-Year Energy Impacts per Unit - Specific Applications Lighting Zone 3
Lighting
Application
Per-Unit First-Year Savingsa
Units Electricity
Savingsb (kWh/yr)
Demand Savings
(kW)
Natural Gas
Savings
(therms/yr)
Building Entrances Each 75.12 0.00 N/A
Primary Entrances Each 295.77 0.00 N/A
Drive Up Windows Each 239.68 0.01 N/A
Vehicle Service
Uncovered Fuel
Dispenser
Each Pump Face 487.76 0.01 N/A
ATM Machine Each 704.20 0.01 N/A
Outdoor Sales
Frontage Per Linear Foot 32.84 0.00 N/A
Hardscape
Ornamental
Lighting
Per Square Foot 0.13 0.00 N/A
Building Facades Per Square Foot 0.58 0.00 N/A
Outdoor Sales Lots Per Square Foot 2.09 0.00 N/A
Vehicle Service
Station Hardscape Per Square Foot 0.76 0.00 N/A
Vehicle Service
Station Canopies Per Square Foot 3.22 0.00 N/A
Sales Canopies Per Square Foot 0.91 0.00 N/A
Non-sales Canopies Per Square Foot 0.24 0.00 N/A
Guard Stations Per Square Foot 1.80 0.00 N/A
Student Pick-
up/Drop-off Zone Per Square Foot 0.39 0.00 N/A
Outdoor Dining Per Square Foot 0.37 0.00 N/A
Special Security
Lighting for Retail Per Square Foot 0.04 0.00 N/A
a. Savings from one unit for the first year the site is in operation.
b. Site electricity savings, does not include TDV or electricity savings.
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 95
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 18
Table 9: First-Year Energy Impacts per Unit - Specific Applications Lighting Zone 4
Lighting
Application
Per-Unit First-Year Savingsa
Units Electricity
Savingsb (kWh/yr)
Demand Savings
(kW)
Natural Gas
Savings
(therms/yr)
Building Entrances Each 112.67 0.00 N/A
Primary Entrances Each 328.63 0.01 N/A
Drive Up Windows Each 399.46 0.01 N/A
Vehicle Service
Uncovered Fuel
Dispenser
Each Pump Face 914.55 0.02 N/A
ATM Machine Each 704.20 0.01 N/A
Outdoor Sales
Frontage Per Linear Foot 38.64 0.00 N/A
Hardscape
Ornamental
Lighting
Per Square Foot 0.19 0.00 N/A
Building Facades Per Square Foot 0.88 0.00 N/A
Outdoor Sales Lots Per Square Foot 3.75 0.00 N/A
Vehicle Service
Station Hardscape Per Square Foot 1.34 0.00 N/A
Vehicle Service
Station Canopies Per Square Foot 5.59 0.00 N/A
Sales Canopies Per Square Foot 1.26 0.00 N/A
Non-sales Canopies Per Square Foot 0.45 0.00 N/A
Guard Stations Per Square Foot 2.63 0.00 N/A
Student Pick-
up/Drop-off Zone Per Square Foot No Allowance N/A N/A
Outdoor Dining Per Square Foot 0.63 0.00 N/A
Special Security
Lighting for Retail Per Square Foot No Allowance N/A N/A
a. Savings from one unit for the first year the site is in operation.
b. Site electricity savings, does not include TDV or electricity savings.
5. L IFECYCLE C OST AND C OST-E FFECTIVENESS
5.1 Energy Cost Savings Methodology
TDV energy is a normalized format for comparing electricity and natural gas cost savings that takes into
account the cost of electricity and natural gas consumed during each hour of the year. The TDV values
are based on long term discounted costs (30 years for all residential measures and nonresidential
envelope measures and 15 years for all other nonresidential measures). In this case, the period of
analysis used is 15 years. The TDV cost impacts are presented in 2020 present value (PV) dollars. The
TDV energy estimates are based on present-valued cost savings but are normalized in terms of “TDV
kBtu”. Peak demand reductions are presented in peak power reductions (kW). The Energy Commission
derived the 2020 TDV values that were used in the analyses for this report (Energy + Environmental
Economics 2016). The Statewide CASE Team used a similar approach to calculating energy costs as
was used in the 2016 code cycle. The previous methodology and how it was used for the 2019 cycle is
described below.
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 96
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 19
The present value (PV) of the energy savings were calculated using hourly energy savings estimates for
the first year of building operation and multiplying by the 2019 TDV cost values to arrive at the PV of
the cost savings over the 15-year period of analysis. This measure is not climate sensitive, but the
energy cost savings were calculated in each climate zone using TDV values for each unique climate
zone. However, the energy cost savings calculated was then weighted by construction forecasts and
averaged across all climate zones.
5.2 Energy Cost Savings Results
The per-unit energy cost savings for newly constructed buildings are averaged across all lighting zones.
Table 10 presents the weighting used to average savings across all lighting zones. Note, LZ0 is
specifically intended for undeveloped spaces in parks, and therefore has no substantial energy impact on
the statewide values. As previously noted, LZ4 is also a lighting zone that local governments must
request to use from the Energy Commission, and no municipality has chosen to do that yet.
Table 10: Lighting Zone Area Weighting Factors
Lighting
Zone
Energy Impact
Weight (%)
LZ0 0.0%
LZ1 0.1%
LZ2 9.9%
LZ3 90.0%
LZ4 0.0%
Per-unit energy cost savings for General Hardscape over the 15-year period of analysis in both new
construction and alterations are presented in Table 11. Per-unit energy cost savings for Specific
Applications over the 15-year period of analysis for new construction and alterations are presented in
Table 12 and Table 13: Specific Applications TDV Energy Cost Savings Over a 15-Year Period of
Analysis – Per-Unit – Alterations, respectively. The TDV methodology allows peak electricity savings
to be valued more than electricity savings during non-peak periods.
Table 11: TDV Energy Cost Savings Over a 15-Year Period of Analysis, General Hardscape –
Per-Unit
Measure Unit
15-Year TDV
Electricity Cost
Savings
(2020 PV$)
15-Year TDV
Natural Gas Cost
Savings
(2020 PV$)
Total 15-Year TDV
Energy Cost
Savings
(2020 PV$)
General Hardscape –
New Construction
Per Square
Foot $0.10 N/A $0.10
General Hardscape -
Alterations
Per Square
Foot $0.10 N/A $0.10
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 97
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 20
Table 12: Specific Applications TDV Energy Cost Savings Over a 15-Year Period of Analysis –
Per-Unit – New Construction
Sub-measure Units
15-Year TDV
Electricity Cost
Savings
(2020 PV$)
15-Year TDV
Natural Gas Cost
Savings
(2020 PV$)
Total 15-Year
TDV Energy Cost
Savings
(2020 PV$)
Building Entrances Each $172.85 N/A $172.85
Primary Entrances Each $672.33 N/A $672.33
Drive Up Windows Each $550.41 N/A $550.41
Vehicle Service
Uncovered Fuel
Dispenser
Each Pump
Face $1,138.02 N/A $1,138.02
ATM Machine Each $1,086.38 N/A $1,086.38
Outdoor Sales Frontage Per Linear Foot $82.01 N/A $82.01
Hardscape Ornamental
Lighting Per Square Foot $0.18 N/A $0.18
Building Facades Per Square Foot $1.32 N/A $1.32
Outdoor Sales Lots Per Square Foot $4.60 N/A $4.60
Vehicle Service Station
Hardscape Per Square Foot $1.63 N/A $1.63
Vehicle Service Station
Canopies Per Square Foot $7.13 N/A $7.13
Sales Canopies Per Square Foot $2.26 N/A $2.26
Non-sales Canopies Per Square Foot $0.68 N/A $0.68
Guard Stations Per Square Foot $4.01 N/A $4.01
Student Pick-up/Drop-
off Zone Per Square Foot $0.95 N/A $0.95
Outdoor Dining Per Square Foot $0.87 N/A $0.87
Special Security
Lighting for Retail Per Square Foot $0.10 N/A $0.10
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 98
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 21
Table 13: Specific Applications TDV Energy Cost Savings Over a 15-Year Period of Analysis –
Per-Unit – Alterations
Sub-measure Units
15-Year TDV
Electricity Cost
Savings
(2020 PV$)
15-Year TDV
Natural Gas Cost
Savings
(2020 PV$)
Total 15-Year
TDV Energy
Cost Savings
(2020 PV$)
Building Entrances Each $172.85 N/A $172.85
Primary Entrances Each $672.33 N/A $672.33
Drive Up Windows Each $550.41 N/A $550.41
Vehicle Service
Uncovered Fuel
Dispenser
Each Pump Face $1,138.02 N/A $1,138.02
ATM Machine Each $1,086.38 N/A $1,086.38
Outdoor Sales Frontage Per Linear Foot $82.01 N/A $82.01
Hardscape Ornamental
Lighting Per Square Foot $0.18 N/A $0.18
Building Facades Per Square Foot $1.32 N/A $1.32
Outdoor Sales Lots Per Square Foot $4.60 N/A $4.60
Vehicle Service Station
Hardscape Per Square Foot $1.63 N/A $1.63
Vehicle Service Station
Canopies Per Square Foot $7.13 N/A $7.13
Sales Canopies Per Square Foot $2.26 N/A $2.26
Non-sales Canopies Per Square Foot $0.68 N/A $0.68
Guard Stations Per Square Foot $4.01 N/A $4.01
Student Pick-up/Drop-
off Zone Per Square Foot $0.95 N/A $0.95
Outdoor Dining Per Square Foot $0.87 N/A $0.87
Special Security
Lighting for Retail Per Square Foot $0.10 N/A $0.10
5.3 Incremental First Cost
The Statewide CASE Team reached out to 18 manufacturers and referenced distributor pricing to obtain
data on cost, efficacy, maintenance, and pricing of legacy lighting products, which were compared to
equivalent LED luminaire options. 82 different luminaire styles were used and matched as closely as
possible for performance, function, and installation type.
For the Specific Applications allowance, the Statewide CASE Team used the same methodology used in
the 2016 CASE Report.6 This includes utilizing a luminaire lumen to lumen comparison using legacy
light source technology (PSMH, CFL, incandescent, and T8s) compared to new proposed technology
(3000K LED). Both legacy and LED systems consider the life of the technology along with
maintenance access and maintenance cost to establish the cost-effectiveness of LED technology. If the
existing legacy products have been discontinued by the manufacturer and no distributor pricing was
provided, the product prices collected during the 2016 code cycle were applied.
6 2016 Nonresidential Outdoor Lighting Power Allowance CASE Study can be found online:
http://www.energy.ca.gov/title24/2016standards/prerulemaking/documents/2014-06-
24_workshop/final_case_reports/2016_T24_CASE_Report-Outdoor_LPA-Dec_2014-V3.pdf
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 99
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 22
For General Hardscape (Table 140.7-A), three different sites (large, medium, and small parking lot)
were used to calculated realistic lighting layouts and determine an average watts per square foot that can
be achieved per current design standards: IES RP-20-14 “Parking Lot”, CALGreen, and Title 24 2016
Table 140.7-A. The proposed 2019 LPAs were the result of this analysis. The Statewide CASE Team
then compared the 2016 4000K LED baseline effective area wattage allowance to the 3000K LEDs for
the proposed measure.7 The unit cost per watt is the same for 2016 base case and the proposed 2019
Standards case. As explained in Section 4.3 above, the savings were achieved as a result of improved
light loss factors, allowing a lower initial wattage to maintain the same light levels over time. To
calculate first cost implications, the unit cost per watt for the LED luminaires in each lighting zone was
multiplied by the total LPA in the base condition (2016), and in the proposed standards case.8 Since
there is less wattage used in the 2019 LPA values, there is a lower cost of equipment. The difference in
cost of equipment used between the 2016 and 2019 LPAs is the incremental cost of the proposed
measure.
Per Energy Commission’s guidance, design costs were not included in the incremental first cost.
5.4 Lifetime Incremental Maintenance Costs
Incremental maintenance cost is the incremental cost of replacing the equipment or parts of the
equipment, as well as periodic maintenance required to keep the equipment operating relative to current
practices over the period of analysis. The present value of equipment and maintenance costs (savings)
was calculated using a three percent discount rate (d), which is consistent with the discount rate used
when developing the 2019 TDV. The present value of maintenance costs that occurs in the nth year is
calculated as follows (where d is the discount rate of three percent): Present Value of Maintenance Cost =Maintenance Cost × �11 + d
�n
Maintenance costs associated with LED lighting products are generally less than legacy technology. The
LCC analysis uses a 15-year lifecycle, during which no routine maintenance is expected for any of the
LED lighting equipment because the products are still within their life expectancy at that time. As a
result, the maintenance impacts result in savings related to the elimination of typical cyclic routine
maintenance associated with the lighting equipment (primarily lamp/light source and ballast/driver
replacement with failure). The routine maintenance costs consider typical light source and power supply
replacement costs, labor costs, and duration of maintenance. This varies by lamp or light source type
and wattage, so the Statewide CASE Team used a reasonable cross-section of technology to calculate
routine maintenance costs for legacy and LED systems. The energy savings associated with a reduction
in the LPA will persist the entire length of the installation of the lighting equipment. There is no field
verification, maintenance, or commissioning required to ensure that the savings are maintained.
Table 14 and Table 15 show the summary results of the incremental cost analysis. Results in red denote
a negative or zero cost. See Appendix E for more details on the incremental cost calculations.
7 Effective area wattage allowance is calculated by multiplying the wattage per square foot of all prototypes (averaged) by the
average square footage of all the prototypes. The wattage per square foot of each prototype is the total allowed wattage for the
prototype: Area Wattage Allowance (W/ft2) plus Linear Wattage Allowance (W/ft2) multiplied by prototype area (ft2) and
added to Initial Wattage Allowance (W). This was done for the 2016 LPAs and the proposed 2019 LPAs.
8 Total watts allowed per lighting zone based on prototypes is calculated by dividing the average watt per square foot of the
lighting zone by the average square feet of all the prototypes. The average watt per square foot of each lighting zone is the
average of each prototype’s total allowed wattage divided by the prototype’s square footage. Total allowed wattage for each
prototype: Area Wattage Allowance (W/ft2) plus Linear Wattage Allowance (W/ft2) multiplied by prototype area (ft2) and
added to Initial Wattage Allowance (W).
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 100
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 23
Table 14: General Hardscape First Cost, Routine Maintenance Cost, and Total Incremental Cost
First Cost
(per square foot)
Routine Maintenance Cost
(per square foot)
Total Cost
(per square foot)
2016 LPAs (all LZs) $1.54 $0.00 $1.54
2019 Proposed LPAs (all
LZs) $1.03 $0.00 $1.03
Total Incremental Cost per Square Foot (all LZs)a ($0.52)
a. A negative total incremental cost means a measure is instantly cost-effective.
Table 15: Specific Applications First-Cost, Routine Maintenance Cost, and Total Incremental
Cost – Weighted of All Lighting Zonesa
Specific
Application Unit First Cost
(per-unit)
Routine
Maintenance
Cost (per-unit)
Total Cost
(per-unit)
Building
Entrances Each
2016 LPA $697.89 $156.03 $853.92
2019 LPA $383.86 $0.00 $383.86
Total Incremental Cost Per-Unit ($470.06)
Primary
Entrances Each
2016 LPA $902.99 $216.82 $1,119.81
2019 LPA $936.68 $0.00 $936.68
Total Incremental Cost Per-Unit ($183.13)
Drive Up
Windows Each
2016 LPA $511.46 $256.06 $767.52
2019 LPA $670.97 $0.00 $670.97
Total Incremental Cost Per-Unit ($96.55)
Vehicle Service
Uncovered Fuel
Dispenser
Each Pump
Face
2016 LPA $761.57 $234.43 $996.00
2019 LPA $1007.28 $0.00 $1,007.28
Total Incremental Cost Per-Unit $11.28
ATM Machine Each
2016 LPA $843.81 $382.09 $1,225.90
2019 LPA $1,296.76 $0.00 $1,296.76
Total Incremental Cost Per-Unit $70.86
Outdoor Sales
Frontage
Per Linear
Foot
2016 LPA $99.22 $31.20 $130.42
2019 LPA $139.96 $0.00 $139.96
Total Incremental Cost Per-Unit $9.54
Hardscape
Ornamental
Lighting
Per Square
Foot
2016 LPA $0.89 $0.10 $0.99
2019 LPA $0.07 $0.00 $0.07
Total Incremental Cost Per-Unit ($0.92)
Building
Facades
Per Square
Foot
2016 LPA $1.67 $0.48 $2.15
2019 LPA $2.18 $0.00 $2.18
Total Incremental Cost Per-Unit $0.03
Outdoor Sales
Lots
Per Square
Foot
2016 LPA $1.99 $1.05 $3.04
2019 LPA $2.96 $0.00 $2.96
Total Incremental Cost Per-Unit ($0.08)
Vehicle Service
Station
Hardscape
Per Square
Foot
2016 LPA $1.57 $0.24 $1.81
2019 LPA $2.02 $0.00 $2.02
Total Incremental Cost Per-Unit $0.21
Vehicle Service
Station
Canopies
Per Square
Foot
2016 LPA $3.03 $1.69 $4.72
2019 LPA $2.77 $0.00 $2.77
Total Incremental Cost Per-Unit ($1.95)
Sales Canopies Per Square
Foot
2016 LPA $5.08 $1.54 $6.62
2019 LPA $5.11 $0.00 $5.11
Total Incremental Cost Per-Unit ($1.51)
Non-sales
Canopies
Per Square
Foot
2016 LPA $2.64 $1.79 $4.43
2019 LPA $2.65 $0.00 $2.65
Total Incremental Cost Per-Unit ($1.78)
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 101
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 24
Specific
Application Unit First Cost
(per-unit)
Routine
Maintenance
Cost (per-unit)
Total Cost
(per-unit)
Guard Stations Per Square
Foot
2016 LPA $4.98 $1.68 $6.66
2019 LPA $4.12 $0.00 $4.12
Total Incremental Cost Per-Unit ($2.54)
Student Pick-
up/Drop-off
Zone
Per Square
Foot
2016 LPA $3.06 $0.36 $3.42
2019 LPA $2.77 $0.00 $2.77
Total Incremental Cost Per-Unit ($0.65)
Outdoor Dining Per Square
Foot
2016 LPA $0.01 $7.09 $7.10
2019 LPA $0.06 $0.00 $0.06
Total Incremental Cost Per-Unit ($7.04)
Special Security
Lighting for
Retail
Per Square
Foot
2016 LPA $0.27 $0.06 $0.33
2019 LPA $0.19 $0.00 $0.19
Total Incremental Cost Per-Unit ($0.14)
a. A negative total incremental cost means a measure is instantly cost-effective
5.5 Lifecycle Cost-Effectiveness
This measure proposes a prescriptive requirement. As such, a lifecycle cost analysis is required to
demonstrate that the measure is cost-effective over the 15-year period of analysis. The Energy
Commission establishes the procedures for calculating lifecycle cost-effectiveness. The Statewide
CASE Team collaborated with Energy Commission staff to confirm that the methodology in this report
is consistent with their guidelines, including which costs were included in the analysis. In this case,
incremental first cost and incremental routine maintenance costs within the 15-year period of analysis
were included. The TDV energy cost savings from electricity savings were also included in the
evaluation. Design costs and the incremental cost of code compliance verification were not included.
According to the Energy Commission’s definitions, a measure is cost-effective if the benefit-to-cost
(B/C) ratio is greater than 1.0. The B/C ratio is calculated by dividing the total present lifecycle cost
benefits by the present value of the total incremental costs.
Results of the per-unit lifecycle cost-effectiveness analyses are presented in Table 16 and Table 17 for
General Hardscape new construction and alterations, respectively. Table 18, and Table 19 present the
results for Specific Applications new construction and alterations, respectively.
Table 16: General Hardscape Lifecycle Cost-Effectiveness Summary Per-Unit – New
Construction
Sub-Measure Units
Benefits
TDV Energy Cost
Savings + Other PV
Savingsa
(2020 PV$)
Costs
Total Incremental PV
Costsb
(2020 PV$)
Benefit-to-
Cost Ratio
General Hardscape Per Square Foot $ 0.25 $0.00 Infinite
a. Benefits: TDV Energy Cost Savings + Other PV Savings: Benefits include TDV energy cost savings over the period of
analysis (Energy + Environmental Economics 2016, 51-53). Other savings are discounted at a real (nominal – inflation)
three percent rate. Other PV savings include incremental first-cost savings if proposed first cost is less than current first
cost. Includes present value maintenance cost savings if PV of proposed maintenance costs is less than the PV of current
maintenance costs.
b. Costs: Total Incremental Present Valued Costs: Costs include incremental equipment, replacement and routine
maintenance costs over the period of analysis. Costs are discounted at a real (inflation adjusted) three percent rate.
Includes incremental first cost if proposed first cost is greater than current first cost. Includes present value of routine
maintenance incremental cost if PV of proposed routine maintenance costs is greater than the PV of current routine
maintenance costs. If incremental routine maintenance cost is negative it is treated as a positive benefit. If there are no
Total Incremental Present Valued Costs, the B/C ratio is infinite.
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 102
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 25
Table 17: General Hardscape Lifecycle Cost-Effectiveness Summary Per-Unit – Alterations
Sub-Measure Units
Benefits
TDV Energy Cost
Savings + Other PV
Savingsa
(2020 PV $)
Costs
Total Incremental PV
Costsb
(2020 PV $)
Benefit-to-
Cost Ratio
General Hardscape Per Square Foot $ 0.25 $0.00 Infinite
a. Benefits: TDV Energy Cost Savings + Other PV Savings: Benefits include TDV energy cost savings over the period
of analysis (Energy + Environmental Economics 2016, 51-53). Other savings are discounted at a real (nominal –
inflation) three percent rate. Other PV savings include incremental first-cost savings if proposed first cost is less than
current first cost. Includes present value maintenance cost savings if PV of proposed maintenance costs is less than the
PV of current maintenance costs.
b. Costs: Total Incremental Present Valued Costs: Costs include incremental equipment, replacement and routine
maintenance costs over the period of analysis. Costs are discounted at a real (inflation adjusted) three percent rate.
Includes incremental first cost if proposed first cost is greater than current first cost. Includes present value of routine
maintenance incremental cost if PV of proposed routine maintenance costs is greater than the PV of current routine
maintenance costs. If incremental routine maintenance cost is negative it is treated as a positive benefit. If there are no
Total Incremental Present Valued Costs, the B/C ratio is infinite.
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 103
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 26
Table 18: Specific Applications Lifecycle Cost-effectiveness Summary Per-Unit – New
Construction
Sub-Measure Units
Benefits
TDV Energy Cost
Savings + Other
PV Savingsa
(2020 PV$)
Costs
Total Incremental PV
Costsb
(2020 PV$)
Benefit-to-
Cost Ratio
Building Entrances Each $172.85 $0.00 Infinite
Primary Entrances Each $672.33 $0.00 Infinite
Drive Up Windows Each $550.41 $0.00 Infinite
Vehicle Service
Uncovered Fuel
Dispenser
Each Pump
Face $1,138.02 $11.66 97.6
ATM Machine Each $1,086.38 $90.89 12.0
Outdoor Sales Frontage Per Linear
Foot $82.01 $11.17 7.35
Hardscape Ornamental
Lighting
Per Square
Foot $0.18 $0.00 Infinite
Building Facades Per Square
Foot $1.32 $0.02 51.4
Outdoor Sales Lots Per Square
Foot $4.60 $0.00 Infinite
Vehicle Service Station
Hardscape
Per Square
Foot $1.63 $0.21 7.9
Vehicle Service Station
Canopies
Per Square
Foot $7.13 $0.00 Infinite
Sales Canopies Per Square
Foot $2.26 $0.00 Infinite
Non-sales Canopies Per Square
Foot $0.68 $0.00 Infinite
Guard Stations Per Square
Foot $4.01 $0.00 Infinite
Student Pick-up/Drop-off
Zone
Per Square
Foot $0.95 $0.00 Infinite
Outdoor Dining Per Square
Foot $0.87 $0.00 Infinite
Special Security Lighting
for Retail
Per Square
Foot $0.10 $0.00 Infinite
a. Benefits: TDV Energy Cost Savings + Other PV Savings: Benefits include TDV energy cost savings over the period of
analysis (Energy + Environmental Economics 2016, 51-53). Other savings are discounted at a real (nominal – inflation)
three percent rate. Other PV savings include incremental first cost savings if proposed first cost is less than current first
cost. Includes present value maintenance cost savings if PV of proposed maintenance costs is less than the PV of current
maintenance costs.
b. Costs: Total Incremental Present Valued Costs: Costs include incremental equipment, replacement and routine
maintenance costs over the period of analysis. Costs are discounted at a real (inflation adjusted) three percent rate.
Includes incremental first cost if proposed first cost is greater than current first cost. Includes present value of routine
maintenance incremental cost if PV of proposed routine maintenance costs is greater than the PV of current routine
maintenance costs. If incremental routine maintenance cost is negative it is treated as a positive benefit. If there are no
Total Incremental Present Valued Costs, the B/C ratio is infinite.
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 104
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 27
Table 19: Specific Applications Lifecycle Cost-effectiveness Summary Per-Unit – Alterations
Sub-Measure Units
Benefits
TDV Energy Cost
Savings + Other PV
Savingsa
(2020 PV$)
Costs
Total Incremental PV
Costsb
(2020 PV$)
Benefit-to-
Cost Ratio
Building Entrances Each $172.85 $0.00 Infinite
Primary Entrances Each $672.33 $0.00 Infinite
Drive Up Windows Each $550.41 $0.00 Infinite
Vehicle Service
Uncovered Fuel
Dispenser
Each Pump
Face $1,138.02 $11.66 97.6
ATM Machine Each $1,086.38 $90.89 12.0
Outdoor Sales Frontage Per Linear
Foot $82.01 $11.17 7.35
Hardscape Ornamental
Lighting
Per Square
Foot $0.18 $0.00 Infinite
Building Facades Per Square
Foot $1.32 $0.02 51.4
Outdoor Sales Lots Per Square
Foot $4.60 $0.00 Infinite
Vehicle Service Station
Hardscape
Per Square
Foot $1.63 $0.21 7.9
Vehicle Service Station
Canopies
Per Square
Foot $7.13 $0.00 Infinite
Sales Canopies Per Square
Foot $2.26 $0.00 Infinite
Non-sales Canopies Per Square
Foot $0.68 $0.00 Infinite
Guard Stations Per Square
Foot $4.01 $0.00 Infinite
Student Pick-up/Drop-off
Zone
Per Square
Foot $0.95 $0.00 Infinite
Outdoor Dining Per Square
Foot $0.87 $0.00 Infinite
Special Security Lighting
for Retail
Per Square
Foot $0.10 $0.00 Infinite
a. Benefits: TDV Energy Cost Savings + Other PV Savings: Benefits include TDV energy cost savings over the period of
analysis (Energy + Environmental Economics 2016, 51-53). Other savings are discounted at a real (nominal – inflation)
three percent rate. Other PV savings include incremental first cost savings if proposed first cost is less than current first
cost. Includes present value routine maintenance cost savings if PV of proposed routine maintenance costs is less than the
PV of current routine maintenance costs.
b. Costs: Total Incremental Present Valued Costs: Costs include incremental equipment, replacement and routine
maintenance costs over the period of analysis. Costs are discounted at a real (inflation adjusted) three percent rate.
Includes incremental first cost if proposed first cost is greater than current first cost. Includes present value of routine
maintenance incremental cost if PV of proposed routine maintenance costs is greater than the PV of current routine
maintenance costs. If incremental routine maintenance cost is negative it is treated as a positive benefit. If there are no
Total Incremental Present Valued Costs, the B/C ratio is infinite.
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 105
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 28
6. F IRST-Y EAR S TATEWIDE I MPACTS
6.1 Statewide Energy Savings and Lifecycle Energy Cost Savings
The Statewide CASE Team calculated the first-year statewide savings for new construction by
multiplying the per-unit savings, which are presented in Section 4.3, by the statewide new construction
forecast for 2020 or expected alterations in 2020, which is presented in more detail in Appendix A. The
first-year energy impacts represent the annual savings from all buildings that were completed in 2020
for the first 12 months the buildings are operational. The lifecycle energy cost savings represent the
energy cost savings over the entire 15-year analysis period. The statewide savings estimates do not take
naturally occurring market adoption or compliance rates into account.
Results from new construction and alterations for General Hardscape and Specific Applications by
climate zone are presented in Table 20 through Table 23.
Given data regarding the new construction forecast and expected additions and alterations in 2020, the
Statewide CASE Team estimates that the proposed code change will reduce annual statewide electricity
use by 118 GWh with an associated demand reduction of 2.4 MW. Natural gas use is expected to be
reduced by zero therms. The energy savings for buildings constructed in 2020 are associated with a
present valued energy cost savings of approximately $273.61 million in (discounted) energy costs over
the 15-year period of analysis.
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 106
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 29
Table 20: General Hardscape Statewide Energy and Energy Cost Impacts – New Construction
Sub-measure Units
Statewide
Construction in
2020
(millions of
units)
First-Year
Electricity
Savings
(GWh)
First-Year Peak
Electrical Demand
Reduction
(MW)
First-Year
Natural Gas
Savings
(million therms)
Lifecycle2 Present
Valued Energy Cost
Savings
(PV$ million)
General Hardscape Per Square
Foot 136.24 15.08 0.25 N/A $34.10
Table 21: General Hardscape Statewide Energy and Energy Cost Impacts – Alterations
Sub-measure Units
Statewide
Construction in
2020
(millions of units)
First-Year
Electricity
Savings
(GWh)
First-Year Peak
Electrical Demand
Reduction
(MW)
First-Year
Natural Gas
Savings
(million therms)
Lifecycle2 Present
Valued Energy Cost
Savings
(PV$ million)
General Hardscape Per Square
Foot 401.64 44.44 0.75 N/A $100.50
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 107
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 30
Table 22: Specific Applications Statewide Energy and Energy Cost Impacts – New Construction
Sub-measure Units
Statewide
Construction in
2020
(millions of
units)
First-Yeara
Electricity
Savings
(GWh)
First-Year Peak
Electrical Demand
Reduction
(MW)
First-Year
Natural Gas
Savings
(million therms)
Lifecycleb PV
Energy Cost
Savings
(PV$ million)
Building Entrances Each 0.03 2.54 0.04 N/A $6.07
Primary Entrances Each 0.00 0.02 0.00 N/A $0.04
Drive Up Windows Each 0.00 0.21 0.01 N/A $0.51
Vehicle Service Uncovered
Fuel Dispenser Each Pump Face 0.00 0.02 0.00 N/A $0.04
ATM Machine Each 0.00 0.11 0.00 N/A $0.14
Outdoor Sales Frontage Per Linear Foot 0.01 3.80 0.15 N/A $8.00
Hardscape Ornamental Lighting Per Square Foot 5.10 0.61 0.01 N/A $0.97
Building Facades Per Square Foot 8.00 4.36 0.11 N/A $2.83
Outdoor Sales Lots Per Square Foot 2.40 3.55 0.09 N/A $4.48
Vehicle Service Station
Hardscape Per Square Foot 4.40 2.74 0.06 N/A $5.84
Vehicle Service Station
Canopies Per Square Foot 0.48 1.36 0.03 N/A $2.78
Sales Canopies Per Square Foot 0.20 0.18 0.00 N/A $0.37
Non-sales Canopies Per Square Foot 3.00 1.83 0.01 N/A $2.01
Guard Stations Per Square Foot 0.05 0.08 0.00 N/A $0.18
Student Pick-up/Drop-off Zone Per Square Foot 0.21 0.08 0.00 N/A $0.20
Outdoor Dining Per Square Foot 0.65 0.55 0.01 N/A $0.58
Special Security Lighting for
Retail Per Square Foot 0.62 0.02 0.00 N/A $0.06
TOTAL 17.08 14.75 0.34 N/A $35.10
a. First-year savings from all buildings completed statewide in 2020.
b. Energy cost savings from all buildings completed statewide in 2020 accrued during 15-year period of analysis.
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 108
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 31
Table 23: Specific Applications Statewide Energy and Energy Cost Impacts – Alterations
Sub-measure Units
Statewide
Construction in
2020
(million
units)
First-Yeara
Electricity
Savings
(GWh)
First-Year Peak
Electrical
Demand
Reduction
(MW)
First-Year
Natural Gas
Savings
(million therms)
Lifecycleb PV
Energy Cost
Savings
(PV$ million)
Building Entrances Each 0.10 7.55 0.13 N/A $18.06
Primary Entrances Each 0.00 0.06 0.00 N/A $0.13
Drive Up Windows Each 0.00 0.60 0.01 N/A $1.44
Vehicle Service Uncovered
Fuel Dispenser Each Pump Face 0.00 0.05 0.00 N/A $0.11
ATM Machine Each 0.00 0.27 0.00 N/A $0.42
Outdoor Sales Frontage Per Linear Foot 0.29 9.22 0.37 N/A $23.78
Hardscape Ornamental Lighting Per Square Foot 15.17 1.82 0.03 N/A $2.79
Building Facades Per Square Foot 6.29 3.35 0.08 N/A $8.29
Outdoor Sales Lots Per Square Foot 2.90 5.87 0.11 N/A $13.34
Vehicle Service Station
Hardscape Per Square Foot 10.63 7.67 0.13 N/A $17.37
Vehicle Service Station
Canopies Per Square Foot 1.16 3.65 0.06 N/A $8.27
Sales Canopies Per Square Foot 0.48 0.43 0.01 N/A $1.09
Non-sales Canopies Per Square Foot 8.54 1.93 0.03 N/A $5.84
Guard Stations Per Square Foot 0.14 0.23 0.00 N/A $0.54
Student Pick-up/Drop-off Zone Per Square Foot 0.70 0.25 0.01 N/A $0.66
Outdoor Dining Per Square Foot 1.89 0.66 0.03 N/A $1.63
Special Security Lighting for
Retail Per Square Foot 1.67 0.07 0.00 N/A $0.16
TOTAL 49.95 43.68 1.02 N/A $103.91
a. First-year savings from all alterations completed statewide in 2020.
b. Energy cost savings from all alterations completed statewide in 2020 accrued during 15-year period of analysis.
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 109
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 32
6.2 Statewide Water Use Impacts
The proposed code change will not result in water savings.
6.3 Statewide Material Impacts
The Statewide CASE Team calculated material impacts based on life-cycle assessment of impacts of
LED and legacy technology products.9
Table 24: Impacts of Material Usec
Element Impact (I, D, or NC) a Impact on Material Use (lbs/yr)
Per-Unit Impacts First-Yearb Statewide Impacts
Antimony D 0.0 13
Arsenic I 0.0 0.1
Barium I 0.0 21
Chromium I 0.0 17
Copper D 0.0 372
Lead D 0.0 47
Mercury D 0.0 0.2
Nickel D 0.0 11
Silver I 0.0 3
Zinc D 0.0 237
a. Material Increase (I), Decrease (D), or No Change (NC) compared to base case (lbs/yr).
b. First-year savings from all new construction completed statewide in 2020.
c. Materials with increased usage have been colored red.
6.4 Other Non-Energy Impacts
There are a number of non-energy impacts and benefits resulting from this code change. The new
proposed LPAs are based on less efficacious, 3000K LED luminaires to ensure warmer CCTs are not
precluded per code requirements. Additionally, an all LED baseline means that areas can be
continuously and smoothly dimmed as necessary, versus large increments in dimming levels associated
with legacy technology. LED luminaires can also operate at a much lower rated light source power level
than legacy products. LEDs are typically able to operate at ten percent rated light source power while
the lamp power of a PSMH luminaire cannot drop below 50 percent of its rated value. Additionally,
LED technology has progressed so that local fauna and local active professional observatories’ needs
can be accommodated. This proposed measure includes an increases wattage allowance so that narrow
band spectrum light sources can be used that will not disturb sensitive species or observatories.
7. P ROPOSED R EVISIONS TO C ODE L ANGUAGE
The proposed changes to the Standards, Reference Appendices, and the ACM Reference Manuals are
provided below. Changes to the 2016 documents are marked with underlining (new language) and
strikethroughs (deletions).
9 https://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2015/10/f27/2013_led_lca-pt3.pdf
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 110
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 33
7.1 Standards
SECTION 100.1 – DEFINITIONS AND RULES OF CONSTRUCTION
NARROW BAND SPECTRUM is a limited range of wavelengths (nm) concentric to a dominant peak
wavelength in the visible spectrum. The limited range of wavelengths shall be within 20 nm on either
side of the peak wavelength at 50 percent of the peak wavelength’s relative spectral power, and within
75 nm on either side of the peak wavelength at 10 percent of the peak wavelength’s relative spectral
power.
SECTION 130.2(b) – OUTDOOR LIGHTING CONTROLS AND EQUIPMENT
(b) Luminaire Cutoff Shielding Requirements. All outdoor luminaires rated for use with lamps
greater than 30 150 lamp watts, determined in accordance with Section 130.0(c), shall comply with
Backlight, Uplight, and Glare (collectively referred to as "BUG" in accordance with IES TM-15-11,
Addendum A) requirements as follows:
SECTION 140.7 – REQUIREMENTS FOR OUTDOOR LIGHTING
Two new lines were added to Table 140.7-A for concrete hardscape and asphalt hardscape and a third
footnote for narrow band spectrum light sources was added. This table was also modified with edits to
footnote two that incorporate revisions to RP-20. Table 25 and Table 26 below represent the current and
proposed formats and LPAs, respectively:
Table 25: 2016 Table 140.7-A General Hardscape Format and LPAs
Type of Power Allowance Lighting Zone 0 Lighting Zone 1 Lighting Zone 22 Lighting Zone 32 Lighting Zone 4
Area Wattage Allowance
(AWA)0.020 W/ft2 0.030 W/ft2 0.040 W/ft2 0.050 W/ft2
Linear Wattage Allowance
(LWA)0.15 W/lf 0.25 W/lf 0.35 W/lf 0.45 W/lf
Initial Wattage Allowance
(IWA)340 W 450 W 520 W 640 W
1 Continuous lighting is explicitly prohibited in Lighting Zone 0. A single luminaire of 15 Watts or less may be installed at an
entrance to a parking area, trail head, fee payment kiosk, outhouse, or toilet facility, as required to provide safe navigation of
the site infrastructure. Luminaires installed in Lighting Zone 0 shall meet the maximum zonal lumen limits for Uplight and Glare
specified in Table 130.2-A and 130.2-B.
2 For Lighting Zone 2 and 3, where greater than 50% of the paved surface of a parking lot is finished with concrete, the AWA
for that area shall be 0.035 W/ft2 for Lighting Zone 2 and 0.040 W/ft2 for Lighting Zone 3, and the LWA for both lighting zones
shall be 0.70 W/lf. This does not extend beyond the parking lot, and does not include any other General Hardscape areas.
No Allowance 1
TABLE 140.7-A GENERAL HARDSCAPE LIGHTING POWER ALLOWANCE
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 111
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 34
Table 26: Proposed Format With New LPAs For Table 140.7-A General Hardscape
Type of
Power
Allowance
Lighting Zone
03 Lighting Zone
13 Lighting Zone 23 Lighting Zone 33 Lighting Zone
43
Asphalt/Concrete Asphalt/Concrete Asphalt Concrete2 Asphalt Concrete2 Asphalt/Concrete
Area
Wattage
Allowance
(AWA)
No Allowance1
0.018 0.023 0.025 0.025 0.030 0.030
Linear
Wattage
Allowance
(LWA)
0.15 0.17 0.40 0.25 0.40 0.35
Initial
Wattage
Allowance
(IWA)
180 250 250 350 350 400
1 Continuous lighting is explicitly prohibited in Lighting Zone 0. A single luminaire of 15 Watts or less may be installed at an entrance to a
parking area, trail head, fee payment kiosk, outhouse, or toilet facility, as required to provide safe navigation of the site infrastructure.
Luminaires installed in Lighting Zone 0 shall meet the maximum zonal lumen limits for Uplight and Glare specified in Table 130.2-A and
130.2-B.
2 Where greater than 50% of the paved surface of a parking lot is finished with concrete. This does not extend beyond the parking lot, and
does not include any other General hardscape areas.
3 Light sources having a narrow band spectral output with a dominant peak wavelength greater than 580 nm - as mandated by local, state, or
federal agencies to minimize the impact on local, active professional astronomy or nocturnal habitat of specific local fauna - shall be
allowed a 2.0 lighting power allowance multiplier.
Table 27 below includes the new LPAs for Specific Applications.
Table 27: New LPAs For Table 140.7-B Specific Applications
Lighting Application Lighting
Zone 0
Lighting
Zone 1
Lighting
Zone 2
Lighting
Zone 3
Lighting
Zone 4
WATTAGE ALLOWANCE PER APPLICATION. Use all that apply as appropriate.
Building Entrances or Exits. Allowance per door. Luminaires
qualifying for this allowance shall be within 20 feet of the door.
Not
Applicable
15 9
watts
25 15
watts
35 19
watts
45 21
watts
Primary Entrances to Senior Care Facilities, Police Stations,
Hospitals, Fire Stations, and Emergency Vehicle Facilities.
Allowance per primary entrance(s) only. Primary entrances shall
provide access for the general public and shall not be used
exclusively for staff or service personnel. This allowance shall be
in addition to the building entrance or exit allowance above.
Luminaires qualifying for this allowance shall be within 100 feet of
the primary entrance.
Not
Applicable
45 20
watts
80 40
watts
120 57
watts
130 60
watts
Drive Up Windows. Allowance per customer service location.
Luminaires qualifying for this allowance shall be within 2
mounting heights of the sill of the window.
Not
Applicable
40 16
watts
75 30
watts
125 50
watts
200 75
watts
Vehicle Service Station Uncovered Fuel Dispenser.
Allowance per fueling dispenser. Luminaires qualifying for this
allowance shall be within 2 mounting heights of the dispenser.
Not
Applicable
120 55
watts
175 77
watts
185 81
watts
330 135
watts
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 112
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 35
Lighting Application Lighting
Zone 0
Lighting
Zone 1
Lighting
Zone 2
Lighting
Zone 3
Lighting
Zone 4
ATM Machine Lighting. Allowance per ATM machine.
Luminaires qualifying for this allowance shall be within 50 feet
of the dispenser.
Not
Applicable
250 100 watts for first ATM machine,
70 35 watts for each additional ATM machine
WATTAGE ALLOWANCE PER UNIT LENGTH (w/linear ft). May be used for one or two frontage side(s) per site.
Outdoor Sales Frontage. Allowance for frontage immediately
adjacent to the principal viewing location(s) and unobstructed for
its viewing length. A corner sales lot may include two adjacent
sides to a public right of way provided that a different principal
viewing location exists for each side. Luminaires qualifying for this
allowance shall be located between the principal viewing location
and the frontage outdoor sales area.
Not
Applicable
No
Allowance
22.5 11
W/linear
ft
36
19
W/linear ft
45 25
W/linear ft
WATTAGE ALLOWANCE PER HARDSCAPE AREA (W/ft²). May be used for any illuminated hardscape area on the site.
Hardscape Ornamental Lighting. Allowance for the total site
illuminated hardscape area. Luminaires qualifying for this
allowance shall be rated for 100 watts or less as determined in
accordance with Section 130.0(d), and shall be post- top
luminaires, lanterns, pendant luminaires, or chandeliers.
Not
Applicable
No
Allowance
0.02
0.007
W/ft²
0.04
0.013
W/ft²
0.06
0.019
W/ft²
WATTAGE ALLOWANCE PER SPECIFIC AREA (W/ft²). Use as appropriate provided that none of the following specific
applications shall be used for the same area.
Building Facades. Only areas of building façade that are
illuminated shall qualify for this allowance. Luminaires qualifying
for this allowance shall be aimed at the façade and shall be capable
of illuminating it without obstruction or interference by permanent
building features or other objects.
Not
Applicable
No
Allowance
0.18
0.100
W/ft²
0.35
0.170
W/ft²
0.50
0.225
W/ft²
Outdoor Sales Lots. Allowance for uncovered sales lots used
exclusively for the display of vehicles or other merchandise for
sale. Driveways, parking lots or other non-sales areas shall be
considered hardscape areas even if these areas are completely
surrounded by sales lot on all sides. Luminaires qualifying for this
allowance shall be within 5 mounting heights of the sales lot area.
Not
Applicable
0.164
0.060
W/ft²
0.555
0.210
W/ft²
0.758
0.280
W/ft²
1.285
0.485
W/ft²
Vehicle Service Station Hardscape. Allowance for the total
illuminated hardscape area less area of buildings, under
canopies, off property, or obstructed by signs or structures.
Luminaires qualifying for this allowance shall be illuminating
the hardscape area and shall not be within a building, below a
canopy, beyond property lines, or obstructed by a sign or other
structure.
Not
Applicable
0.014
0.006
W/ft²
0.155
0.068
W/ft²
0.308
0.138
W/ft²
0.485
0.200
W/ft²
Vehicle Service Station Canopies. Allowance for the total area
within the drip line of the canopy. Luminaires qualifying for this
allowance shall be located under the canopy.
Not
Applicable
0.514
0.220
W/ft²
1.005
0.430
W/ft²
1.300
0.580
W/ft²
2.200
1.010
W/ft²
Sales Canopies. Allowance for the total area within the drip
line of the canopy. Luminaires qualifying for this allowance
shall be located under the canopy.
Not
Applicable
No
Allowance
0.655
0.470
W/ft²
0.908
0.622
W/ft²
1.135
0.740
W/ft²
Non-sales Canopies and Tunnels. Allowance for the total
area within the drip line of the canopy or inside the tunnel.
Luminaires qualifying for this allowance shall be located
under the canopy or tunnel.
Not
Applicable
0.084
0.057
W/ft²
0.205
0.137
W/ft²
0.408
0.270
W/ft²
0.585
0.370
W/ft²
Guard Stations. Allowance up to 1,000 square feet per vehicle
lane. Guard stations provide access to secure areas controlled by
security personnel who stop and may inspect vehicles and vehicle
occupants, including identification, documentation, vehicle license
plates, and vehicle contents. Qualifying luminaires shall be within
2 mounting heights of a vehicle lane or the guardhouse.
Not
Applicable
0.154
0.081
W/ft²
0.355
0.176
W/ft²
0.708
0.325
W/ft²
0.985
0.425
W/ft²
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 113
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 36
Lighting Application Lighting
Zone 0
Lighting
Zone 1
Lighting
Zone 2
Lighting
Zone 3
Lighting
Zone 4
Student Pick-up/Drop-off zone. Allowance for the area of the
student pick-up/drop-off zone, with or without canopy, for preschool
through 12th grade school campuses. A student pick-up/drop off
zone is a curbside, controlled traffic area on a school campus where
students are picked-up and dropped off from vehicles. The allowed
area shall be the smaller of the actual width or 25 feet, times the
smaller of the actual length or 250 feet. Qualifying luminaires shall
be within 2 mounting heights of the student pick-up/drop-off zone.
Not
Applicable
No
Allowance
0.12
0.056
W/ft²
0.45
0.200
W/ft²
No
Allowance
Outdoor Dining. Allowance for the total illuminated hardscape of
outdoor dining. Outdoor dining areas are hardscape areas used to
serve and consume food and beverages. Qualifying luminaires
shall be within 2 mounting heights of the hardscape area of
outdoor dining.
Not
Applicable
0.014
0.004
W/ft²
0.135
0.030
W/ft²
0.240
0.050
W/ft²
0.400
0.075
W/ft²
Special Security Lighting for Retail Parking and Pedestrian
Hardscape. This additional allowance is for illuminated retail
parking and pedestrian hardscape identified as having special
security needs. This allowance shall be in addition to the building
entrance or exit allowance.
Not
Applicable
0.007
0.004
W/ft²
0.009
0.005
W/ft²
0.019
0.010
W/ft²
No
Allowance
7.2 Reference Appendices
There are no proposed changes to the Reference Appendices.
7.3 ACM Reference Manual
There are no proposed changes to the ACM Reference Manual.
7.4 Compliance Manuals
Chapter 6 of the Nonresidential Compliance Manual will need to be revised to account for updated
LPAs. No other changes are expected in the manual.
7.5 Compliance Documents
Compliance document NRCC-LTO-03-E will need to be revised to account for different LPAs between
asphalt and concrete for Table 140.7-A General Hardscape.
8. B IBLIOGRAPHY
Association, National Electrical manufacturers. 2017. "Lamp Indices." The Association of Electrical
Equipment and Medical Imaging Manufacturers. Accessed April 17, 2017.
http://www.nema.org/Intelligence/Pages/Lamp-Indices.aspx.
Association, National Energy Assistance Directors. 2011. "2011 National Energy Assistance Survey Final
Report." Accessed February 2, 2017.
http://www.appriseinc.org/reports/Final%20NEADA%202011%20Report.pdf.
BW Research Partnership. 2016. Advanced Energy Jobs in California: Results of the 2016 California
Advanced Energy. Advanced Energy Economy Institute.
California Energy Commission. 2015. "2016 Building Energy Efficiency Standards: Frequently Asked
Questions." Accessed February 2, 2017.
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 114
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 37
http://www.energy.ca.gov/title24/2016standards/rulemaking/documents/2016_Building_Energy_
Efficiency_Standards_FAQ.pdf.
Energy + Environmental Economics. 2016. "Time Dependent Valuation of Energy for Developing
Building Efficiency Standards: 2019 Time Dependent Valuation (TDV) Data Sources and
Inputs." Prepared for the California Energy Commission. July.
http://docketpublic.energy.ca.gov/PublicDocuments/16-BSTD-
06/TN212524_20160801T120224_2019_TDV_Methodology_Report_7222016.pdf.
Energy, U.S. Department of. 2016. "Snapshot Outdoor Area Lighting." U.S. Department of Energy.
August 29. Accessed March 23, 2017.
https://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2016/10/f33/snapshot2016_outdoor-area.pdf.
Ettenson, Lara , and Christa Heavey. 2015. California's Golden Energy Efficiency Opportunity: Ramping
Up Success to Save Billions and Meet Climate Goals. Natural Resources Defense Council &
Environmental Entrepreneurs (E2).
Goldman, Charles, Merrian C. Fuller, Elizabeth Stuart, Jane S Peters, Marjorie McRay, Nathaniel Albers,
Susan Lutzenhiser, and Mersiha Spahic. 2010. Energy Efficiency Services Sector: Workforce Size
and Expectations for Growth. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Meyer, M. A. 2011. "Commercial Building Energy Alliance Exterior Lighting Scoping Study." Pacific
Northwest National Laboratory. September. Accessed March 23, 2017.
http://www.pnl.gov/main/publications/external/technical_reports/PNNL-20579.pdf.
Navigant Consulting, Inc. 2014. "U.S. Department of Energy." Energy Savings Forecast of Solid-State
Lighting in General Illumination Applications. August. Accessed March 23, 2017.
https://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/publications/pdfs/ssl/energysavingsforecast14.pdf.
Team, Statewide CASE. 2016. "Meeting Notes." Title 24 Stakeholder's Website. September 8. Accessed
January 25, 2017. http://title24stakeholders.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/2019-CASE-
Stakeholder-Meeting-Notes-9-8-2010_Final.pdf.
Thornberg, Christopher, Hoyu Chong, and Adam Fowler. 2016. California Green Innovation Index - 8th
Edition. Next 10.
U.S. Department of Energy. 2016. "Energy Savings Forecast of Solid-State Lighting in General
Illumination Applications." Department of Energy. September. Accessed January 18, 2017.
https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2016/09/f33/energysavingsforecast16_2.pdf.
—. 2016. "U.S. Department of Energy." Solid-State Lighting R&D Plan. June. Accessed March 23, 2017.
https://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2016/06/f32/ssl_rd-plan_%20jun2016_2.pdf.
Wei, Max, Shana Patadia, and Daniel M. Kammen. 2010. "Putting renewables and energy efficiency to
work: How many jobs can the clean energy industry generate in the US?" Energy Policy 38: 919-
931.
Zabin, Carol, and Karen Chapple. 2011. California Workforce Education & Training Needs Assessment:
For Energy Efficiency, Distributed Generation, and Demand Reponse. University of California,
Berkeley Donald Vial Center on Employment in the Green Economomy. Accessed February 3,
2017. http://laborcenter.berkeley.edu/pdf/2011/WET_Appendices_ALL.pdf.
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 115
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 38
Appendix A: S TATEWIDE S AVINGS
M ETHODOLOGY
The projected nonresidential new construction forecast that will be impacted by the proposed code
change in 2020 is presented in Table 28. The projected nonresidential existing statewide building stock
that will be impacted by the propose code change as a result of additions and alterations in 2020 is
presented in Table 29.
To calculate first-year statewide savings, the Statewide CASE Team multiplied the per-unit savings by
statewide new construction estimates for the first year the standards will be in effect (2020). The Energy
Commission Demand Analysis Office provided the Statewide CASE Team with the nonresidential new
construction forecast. The raw data presented annual total building stock and new construction estimates
for twelve building types by forecast climate zones (FCZ). The Statewide CASE Team completed the
following steps to refine the data and develop estimates of statewide floorspace that will be impacted by
the proposed code changes:
The Statewide CASE Team completed the following steps to refine the data and develop estimates of
statewide floorspace that will be impacted by the proposed code changes:
1. Translated data from FCZ data into building climate zones (BCZ). This was completed using
the FCZ to BCZ conversion factors provided by the Energy Commission (see Table 30).
Translated data from FCZ data into building standards climate zones (BSCZ). Since Title 24,
Part 6 uses BSCZ, the Statewide CASE Team converted the construction forecast from FCZ to
BSCZ using conversion factors supplied by the Energy Commission. The conversion factors,
which are presented in Table 30 represent the percentage of building square footage in FCZ that
is also in BSCZ. For example, looking at the first column of conversion factors in Table 30,
22.5 percent of the building square footage in FCZ 1 is also in BSCZ 1 and 0.1 percent of
building square footage in FCZ 4 is in BSCZ 1. To convert from FCZ to BSCZ, the total
forecasted construction for a specific building type in each FCZ was multiplied by the
conversion factors for BSCZ 1, then all square footage from all FCZs that are found to be in
BSCZ 1 are summed to arrive at the total construction for that building type in BSCZ 1. This
process was repeated for every climate zone and every building type. See Table 32 for an
example calculation to convert from FCZ to BSCZ. In this example, construction BSCZ 1 is
made up of building floorspace from FCZs 1, 4, and 14.
2. Made assumptions about the percentage of nonresidential new construction in 2020 that will be
impacted by proposed code change by building type and climate zone. The Statewide CASE
Team’s assumptions are presented in Table 31 and Table 32 and discussed further below.
3. Made assumptions about the percentage of the total nonresidential building stock in 2020 that
will be impacted by the proposed code change (additions and alterations) by building type and
climate zone. The Statewide CASE Team’s assumptions are presented in Table 31 and Table 32
and discussed further below.
4. Calculated nonresidential floorspace that will be impacted by the proposed code change in 2020
by building type and climate zone for both new construction and alterations. Results are
presented in Table 28 and Table 29.
This measure applies to all nonresidential spaces, which is why 100 percent of new construction is
assumed to be affected. The Statewide CASE Team used a seven percent assumption for existing
floorspace as an industry standard percentage of turnover for lighting.
There are several aspects of the statewide estimates that add complexity to the calculation. These are:
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 116
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 39
1. Construction estimates of the square footage of outdoor hardscape are not included in statewide
construction forecasts, and therefore must be estimated by the use of a proxy.
2. The construction forecasts do not predict construction activity based on the Lighting Zones, as
defined in Title 24, and therefore another translation must be performed to predict the statewide
impacts based on the area of each individual Lighting Zone, and modified by anticipated
construction activity weighted for each Lighting Zone.
3. The actual amount of lighting employed on the hardscape is not clearly known. There is
evidence that it may be somewhat less than a fully lighted condition in some cases. The
Statewide CASE Team analysis will adjust the full allowance downward to accommodate sites
that are not fully lighted.
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 117
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 40
Table 28: Estimated New Nonresidential Construction Impacted by Proposed Code Change in 2020, by Climate Zone and Building Type (Million
Square Feet)
Climate
Zone
New Construction in 2020 (Million Square Feet)
Small
Office Restaurant Retail Food
Non-
Refrigerated
Warehouse
Refrigerated
Warehouse School College Hospital Hotel Miscellaneous Large
Office TOTAL
1 0.0494 0.0163 0.0853 0.0287 0.0368 0.0024 0.0656 0.0280 0.0307 0.0252 0.1115 0.0546 0.5344
2 0.2094 0.0921 0.7071 0.1856 0.4734 0.0379 0.3277 0.1629 0.2106 0.2354 0.8961 0.8296 4.3678
3 0.6925 0.3910 3.1839 0.7394 2.8795 0.1861 1.2192 0.7361 0.8441 1.3410 4.2876 5.5830 22.0835
4 0.4642 0.2089 1.6923 0.4394 1.0709 0.0942 0.7371 0.3647 0.5034 0.5232 2.0944 1.8543 10.0470
5 0.0901 0.0406 0.3286 0.0853 0.2079 0.0183 0.1431 0.0708 0.0977 0.1016 0.4066 0.3600 1.9508
6 0.6562 0.4806 2.7570 0.6896 2.2619 0.0986 0.8324 0.4764 0.5260 0.6422 2.6255 3.6351 15.6814
7 0.8790 0.2643 1.7010 0.5230 0.9519 0.0093 0.8959 0.3922 0.5561 0.5616 1.7181 1.8328 10.2854
8 0.9103 0.6887 3.9674 0.9869 3.2044 0.1363 1.2113 0.6661 0.7993 0.9200 3.8447 5.3065 22.6420
9 0.8937 0.7622 4.1915 1.0172 3.4313 0.1143 1.2286 0.7831 1.1364 1.0587 4.4500 7.1600 26.2269
10 0.9833 0.6400 3.0564 0.8578 2.6193 0.0595 1.6484 0.5499 0.6499 0.5891 3.3939 1.7311 16.7786
11 0.2830 0.0875 0.6543 0.2231 0.6491 0.0768 0.4366 0.1406 0.2110 0.1448 0.7554 0.3341 3.9962
12 1.5316 0.4403 3.5976 0.9482 3.0782 0.2282 1.7985 0.6916 1.0131 0.9038 3.9658 3.6878 21.8846
13 0.6028 0.1986 1.4244 0.4797 1.2207 0.1958 0.9484 0.2751 0.4488 0.3201 1.7269 0.6287 8.4700
14 0.1598 0.1219 0.6017 0.1621 0.5098 0.0187 0.2989 0.0969 0.1279 0.1102 0.6806 0.4322 3.3207
15 0.2172 0.0853 0.5340 0.1817 0.5765 0.0167 0.3049 0.0737 0.0905 0.1339 0.5966 0.2185 3.0295
16 0.2220 0.1358 0.7642 0.2060 0.5350 0.0332 0.3240 0.1666 0.1893 0.1510 0.9377 0.9963 4.6611
TOTAL 8.8443 4.6542 29.2467 7.7536 23.7066 1.3263 12.4207 5.6748 7.4348 7.7617 32.4914 34.6448 175.9598
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 118
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 41
Table 29: Estimated Existing Nonresidential Floorspace Impacted by Proposed Code Change in 2020 (Alterations), by Climate Zone and Building Type
(Million Square Feet)
Climate
Zone
Alterations in 2020 (Million Square Feet)
Small
Office Restaurant Retail Food
Non-
Refrigerated
Warehouse
Refrigerated
Warehouse School College Hospital Hotel Miscellaneous Large
Office TOTAL
1 0.1471 0.0475 0.2577 0.0874 0.1283 0.0073 0.1902 0.0981 0.1119 0.0902 0.3107 0.1532 1.6296
2 0.6551 0.2442 1.9541 0.5166 1.3669 0.1081 1.0646 0.5800 0.7262 0.6878 2.4262 2.2715 12.6014
3 2.0934 0.9847 8.1846 1.9039 7.1501 0.4943 4.1610 2.4477 2.8807 3.2837 10.8984 13.7501 58.2327
4 1.4864 0.5487 4.7111 1.2252 3.2142 0.2729 2.4328 1.3312 1.7208 1.5808 5.7553 5.2988 29.5781
5 0.2886 0.1065 0.9147 0.2379 0.6241 0.0530 0.4724 0.2585 0.3341 0.3069 1.1175 1.0288 5.7430
6 2.0920 1.3923 8.2196 2.0578 7.6495 0.3102 3.6382 2.0389 2.1685 2.2835 9.5940 10.0748 51.5193
7 2.5404 0.7374 5.1268 1.5550 3.4287 0.0315 2.4626 1.3414 1.8381 2.1824 5.1626 5.6371 32.0440
8 2.8855 1.9848 11.7115 2.9199 10.7365 0.4281 5.1045 2.7994 3.1900 3.2311 13.8259 14.5972 73.4144
9 2.6479 2.1239 11.4846 2.8097 10.3170 0.3507 4.6013 3.0294 3.9106 3.2276 13.2542 17.8912 75.6480
10 3.0563 1.9712 9.6954 2.6919 10.3684 0.1987 4.6292 1.9062 2.2675 2.2077 10.9100 5.2016 55.1041
11 0.8060 0.2335 1.7677 0.6039 1.9178 0.2230 1.1901 0.4882 0.7102 0.3968 1.9943 0.8518 11.1833
12 4.1402 1.1836 9.8761 2.6078 8.8320 0.6819 5.1107 2.3287 3.4676 2.5740 10.4168 9.7204 60.9400
13 1.7153 0.5161 3.7249 1.2534 3.1859 0.5435 2.6320 0.9747 1.4680 0.8125 4.4551 1.4942 22.7757
14 0.4987 0.3691 1.8405 0.4943 1.9145 0.0580 0.8624 0.3375 0.4464 0.3832 2.1845 1.1972 10.5861
15 0.6470 0.2521 1.5392 0.5116 1.8970 0.0495 0.7499 0.2204 0.3057 0.3856 1.6352 0.5870 8.7804
16 0.6559 0.3819 2.2184 0.5964 1.7429 0.0967 0.9457 0.5797 0.6577 0.4706 2.7056 2.4926 13.5441
TOTAL 26.3558 13.0776 83.2270 22.0728 74.4740 3.9074 40.2476 20.7599 26.2039 24.1045 96.6463 92.2475 523.3243
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 119
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 42
Table 30: Translation from Forecast Climate Zone (FCZ) to Building Standards Climate Zone (BSCZ)
Building Climate Zone (BSCZ)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Total Forecast Climate Zone (FCZ) 1 22.5% 20.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 9.8% 33.1% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 13.8% 100%
2 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 22.0% 75.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.3% 100%
3 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 20.9% 22.8% 54.5% 0.0% 0.0% 1.8% 100%
4 0.1% 13.7% 8.4% 46.0% 8.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 22.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100%
5 0.0% 4.2% 89.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 6.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100%
6 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100%
7 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 75.8% 7.1% 0.0% 17.1% 100%
8 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 40.1% 0.0% 50.8% 8.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.5% 100%
9 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 6.4% 0.0% 26.9% 54.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 6.1% 0.0% 5.8% 100%
10 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 74.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 12.3% 7.9% 4.9% 100%
11 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 27.0% 0.0% 30.6% 42.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100%
12 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 4.2% 95.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 100%
13 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 69.6% 0.0% 0.0% 28.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.6% 0.1% 0.0% 100%
14 2.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 97.1% 100%
15 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 99.9% 0.0% 100%
16 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100%
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 120
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 43
Table 31: Description of Building Types and Sub-types (Prototypes) in Statewide Construction Forecast
Energy
Commission
Building
Type ID
Energy Commission
Description
Prototype Description
Prototype ID
Floor
Area
(ft2)
Stories Notes
OFF-
SMALL
Offices less than 30,000
square feet Small Office 5,502 1 Five zone office model with unconditioned attic and pitched roof.
REST Any facility that serves food Small Restaurant 2,501 1 Similar to a fast food joint with a small kitchen and dining areas.
RETAIL Retail stores and shopping
centers
Stand-Alone Retail 24,563 1 Stand Alone store similar to Walgreens or Banana Republic.
Large Retail 240,000 1 Big box retail building, similar to a Target or Best Buy store.
Strip Mall 9,375 1 Four-unit strip mall retail building. West end unit is twice as large as other three.
Mixed-Use Retail 9,375 1 Four-unit retail representing the ground floor units in a mixed-use building. Same
as the strip mall with adiabatic ceilings.
FOOD Any service facility that
sells food and or liquor N/A N/A N/A N/A
NWHSE Non-refrigerated
warehouses Warehouse 49,495 1 High ceiling warehouse space with small office area.
RWHSE Refrigerated Warehouses N/A N/A N/A N/A
SCHOOL Schools K-12, not including
colleges
Small School 24,413 1 Similar to an elementary school with classrooms, support spaces and small dining
area.
Large School 210,886 2 Similar to high school with classrooms, commercial kitchen, auditorium,
gymnasium and support spaces.
COLLEGE Colleges, universities,
community colleges
Small Office 5,502 1 Five zone office model with unconditioned attic and pitched roof.
Medium Office 53,628 3 Five zones per floor office building with plenums on each floor.
Medium Office/Lab 3 Five zones per floor building with a combination of office and lab spaces.
Public Assembly 2 TBD
Large School 210,886 2 Similar to high school with classrooms, commercial kitchen, auditorium,
gymnasium and support spaces.
High Rise Apartment 93,632 10 75 residential units along with common spaces and a penthouse. Multipliers are
used to represent typical floors.
HOSP Hospitals and other health-
related facilities N/A N/A N/A N/A
HOTEL Hotels and motels Hotel 42,554 4 Hotel building with common spaces and 77 guest rooms.
MISC All other space types that do
not fit another category N/A N/A N/A N/A
OFF-LRG Offices larger than 30,000
square feet
Medium Office 53,628 3 Five zones per floor office building with plenums on each floor.
Large Office 498,589 12 Five zones per floor office building with plenums on each floor. Middle floors
represented using multipliers.
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 121
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 44
Table 32: Converting from Forecast Climate Zone (FCZ) to Building Standards Climate Zone
(BSCZ) – Example Calculation
Climate
Zone
Total Statewide
Small Office
Square Footage
in 2020 by FCZ
(Million Square
Feet)
[A]
Conversion Factor
FCZ to BSCZ 1
[B]
Small Office
Square Footage in
BSCZ 1
(Million Square
Feet)
[C] = A x B
1 0.204 22.5% 0.046
2 0.379 0.0% 0.000
3 0.857 0.0% 0.000
4 1.009 0.1% 0.001
5 0.682 0.0% 0.000
6 0.707 0.0% 0.000
7 0.179 0.0% 0.000
8 1.276 0.0% 0.000
9 0.421 0.0% 0.000
10 0.827 0.0% 0.000
11 0.437 0.0% 0.000
12 0.347 0.0% 0.000
13 1.264 0.0% 0.000
14 0.070 2.9% 0.002
15 0.151 0.0% 0.000
16 0.035 0.0% 0.000
Total 8.844 0.049
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 122
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 45
Table 33: Percent of Floorspace Impacted by Proposed Measure, by Building Type
Building Type
Building sub-type
Composition of
Building Type by
Sub-typesa
Percent of Square Footage Impactedb
New Construction Existing Building
Stock (Alterations)c
Small Office 100% 7%
Restaurant 100% 7%
Retail 100% 7%
Stand-Alone Retail 10% 100% 7%
Large Retail 75% 100% 7%
Strip Mall 5% 100% 7%
Mixed-Use Retail 10% 100% 7%
Food 100% 7%
Non-Refrigerated
Warehouse
100% 7%
Refrigerated Warehouse 100% 7%
Schools 100% 7%
Small School 60% 100% 7%
Large School 40% 100% 7%
College
100% 7%
Small Office 5% 100% 7%
Medium Office 15% 100% 7%
Medium Office/Lab 20% 100% 7%
Public Assembly 5% 100% 7%
Large School 30% 100% 7%
High Rise Apartment 25% 100% 7%
Hospital 100% 7%
Hotel/Motel 100% 7%
Large Offices 100% 7%
Medium Office 50% 100% 7%
Large Office 50% 100% 7%
Miscellaneous 100% 7%
a. Presents the assumed composition of the main building type category by the building sub-types. All 2019 CASE Reports
assumed the same percentages of building sub-types.
b. When the building type is comprised of multiple sub-types, the overall percentage for the main building category was
calculated by weighing the contribution of each sub-type.
c. Percent of existing floorspace that will be altered during the first year the 2019 Standards are in effect.
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 123
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 46
Table 34: Percent of Floorspace Impacted by Proposed Measure, by Climate Zone
Climate
Zone
Percent of Square Footage Impacted
New Construction Existing Building Stock
(Alterations)a
1 100% 7%
2 100% 7%
3 100% 7%
4 100% 7%
5 100% 7%
6 100% 7%
7 100% 7%
8 100% 7%
9 100% 7%
10 100% 7%
11 100% 7%
12 100% 7%
13 100% 7%
14 100% 7%
15 100% 7%
16 100% 7%
a. Percent of existing floorspace that will be altered during the first year the 2019 Standards are in effect.
Outdoor nonresidential construction is not included in the Energy Commission’s construction forecasts,
so the impact of the various lighting measures must be predicted based on other metrics that rely on
indoor construction square footage as the basis of measurement. The Statewide CASE Team estimated
the total square footage of statewide hardscaped area that will be impacted by the proposed measure by
relying on estimates of hardscaped lighting area per Lighting Zone (LZ). This approach was also used
for the 2016 CASE analysis. The definition of the Lighting Zones is tied to the U.S. Census (2010), and
is related to the classification of land mass designated as urban or rural, which is the demarcation line
between LZ2 (rural) and LZ3 (urban). Table 35 presents the percent of U.S. land mass and California
construction activity in each Lighting Zone. Note that the U.S. Census data only provides information
on land mass in LZ0, LZ1, and LZ2 as a single group, and similarly, LZ3 and LZ4 as another group.
Table 35: Percent Construction by Lighting Zone
Lighting
Zone
Percent of Land Mass
(Source: 2010 US Census)
Percent of Construction
Activity (Estimate)
LZ0 9% 0%
LZ1 1% 0.1%
LZ2 85% 9.9%
LZ3 5% 90%
LZ4 0% 0%
Table 36 presents assumptions used to translate the California construction forecast into useful
information about new and altered Specific Applications area. Table 38 provides the assumed ratio of
building square footage per parking space and the resulting ratio of General Hardscape area to new
building area in the statewide construction forecasts. The assumptions for Specific Applications are the
same used in the 2016 CASE Report with some minor refinements. Appendix I details the changes to
the assumptions. Table 36 illustrates the assumptions from the 2016 CASE Report and Table 37 details
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 124
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 47
the updated assumptions. The assumptions for General Hardscape are also the same used in the 2016
CASE Report. See Appendix H for details on the development of these assumptions.
Table 36: Assumptions for Converting Indoor New Construction Forecasts to Outdoor Spaces for
Specific Applications – Table 140.7-B
Lighting Allowance Assumptions Office,LG & SMRetailRestaurantFood (Grocery)Warehouse, Ref & NRHotelSchoolCollegeOtherBuilding Entrances or Exits 1 per 5000 sf of building interior
(20 occupants per door, 250 occ/sf)100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 99%
Primary Entrances to Senior Care
Facilities, Police Stations, Hospitals,
Fire Stations, and Emergency
Vehicle Facilities
1 per 5000 SF of gross building area
(1 primary entrance per building)1%
Drive Up Windows 1 per 1500 SF of gross building area
(2 locations per building; 1000 sf building)30%
Vehicle Service Station Uncovered
Fuel Dispenser
1 per 100 sf of gross building area
(1 fuel dispenser face per 25 sf of station
building interior)
0.01%
Automated Teller Machines 400W MH luminaire as typical standard
practice, switch to 250W limit for first
location, 2500 sf per ATM installation.1%
Outdoor Sales Frontage 0.2 LF per sf of gross building area
(1 display parking space per 50 sf of
building interior)
1.5%
Hardscape Ornamental Lighting 0.1 SF per SF of gross building area 50% 50% 50% 25% 50% 25% 25% 5%
Building Facades 30' building height, 2 floors per
building
(20% of applicable facades are lit)
25% 50% 50%25% 50% 25% 25% 5%
Outdoor Sales Lots 4 SF of sales lot per sf of gross
building area
(1 display parking space per 50 sf of
building interior)
1.5%
Vehicle Service Station Hardscape 11 SF per SF of gross building area 1%
Vehicle Service Station Canopies 1.2 SF of canopy per SF of gross
building area 1%
Sales Canopies 0.1 SF of canopy per SF of gross
building area 5%
Non-sales Canopies 0.1 SF of canopy per SF of gross
building area 25% 25% 25%25% 25% 25% 25% 5%
Guard Stations 0.00043 sf per SF of gross building area
(1 12x18 guard station per 500,000 sf of
total construction)100%100%100% 100%
Student Pick-up/Drop-off zone 0.0173 sf per SF of gross building area
(1 12x72 drop off per 50,000 sf of total
construction)100%
Outdoor Dining 1 sf per 5 sf of gross building area
(20% of typical building sf)2.5% 50%2.5%
Special Security Lighting for Retail
Parking and Pedestrian Hardscape
1 SF per 100 SF gross building SF
(1% of hardscape)100% 100% 100%50%
Assumptions for Statewide Estimates - Specific Applications
Applied to % of Building S.F. in Category
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 125
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 48
Table 37: Changes to Assumptions for Converting Indoor New Construction Forecasts to Outdoor
Spaces for Specific Applications – Table 140.7-B
Lighting Allowance Assumptions
Building Facades 5.15% used instead of 20% from original assumptions.
Outdoor Sales Lots 2 ft2 used instead of 4 ft2 from original assumptions.
Table 38: Assumptions for Converting Indoor New Construction Forecasts to Outdoor Spaces for
General Hardscape – Table 140.7-A
General Hardscape Assumptions
Area
Multipliers
for
Construction
S.F.
for Large Office, Small Office,
Food, Restaurant, College 1 parking space per 250 sf of gross building area 1
for Hotel, Retail, School, Other 1 parking space per 360 sf of gross building area 0.7
for NR Warehouse, Ref.
Warehouse 1 parking space per 830 sf of gross building area 0.3
Assumptions for Statewide Estimates - General Hardscape
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 126
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 49
Appendix B: D ISCUSSION OF I MPACTS OF
C OMPLIANCE P ROCESS ON M ARKET A CTORS
This section discusses how the recommended compliance process, which is described in Section 2.5,
could impact various market actors. The Statewide CASE Team asked stakeholders for feedback on
how the measure will impact various market actors during public stakeholder meetings that were held
on September 8, 2016, and March 30, 2017 (Team 2016). The Statewide CASE Team also held several
meetings with NEMA and conducted an online survey. The key results from feedback received during
stakeholder meetings and other target outreach efforts are detailed below.
Table 39 identifies the market actors who will play a role in complying with the proposed change, the
tasks for which they will be responsible, their objectives in completing the tasks, how the proposed code
change could impact their existing work flow, and ways negative impacts could be mitigated.
The proposed code change increases current code stringency. The Statewide CASE Team expects little
to no compliance issues since no new requirements are being introduced. Market actors will continue to
use the same compliance processes as before. Market actors will need to understand the new
requirements and develop designs to meet the lower LPAs, but otherwise little is expected to change.
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 127
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 50
Table 39: Roles of Market Actors in The Proposed Compliance Process
Market
Actor Task(s) In Compliance Process Objective(s) in Completing
Compliance Tasks
How Proposed Code
Change Could Impact
Work Flow
Opportunities to Minimize Negative
Impacts of Compliance Requirement
Lighting
designer
• Identify relevant requirements
and/ or compliance path and
ensure their design complies
and meets building owner’s
needs.
• Perform required calculations
by space to confirm
compliance.
• Coordinate design with other
team members (HVAC &
modeler).
• Complete compliance
document for permit
application.
• Review submittals during
construction.
• Coordinate with
commissioning agent/ATT as
necessary.
• Quickly and easily determine
requirements based on scope.
• Demonstrate compliance with
calculations required for other
design tasks.
• Streamlined coordination with
other team members.
• Clearly communicate system
requirements to constructors.
• Quickly complete compliance
documents.
• Easily identify non-compliant
substitutions.
• Coordinate with
manufacturers/dealers to know
what products are available
and meet compliance.
• Coordinate with building
owner to determine what their
needs/wants are early in design
phase.
• Interaction with contractors is
around submittal reviews, so
not much coordination (RFI or
submittal reviews).
Subcontractors sends specs
through submittal process to
designer to make sure
compliant with codes. Lighting
designer is supposed to catch if
lights do not meet code.
• Coordinate with the building
department for a plan check.
• Will need to learn
new, more stringent
LPAs.
• Will need to apply
new cutoff wattage
for BUG rating.
• Aside from more
stringent LPAs and
new cutoff wattage
for BUG rating,
compliance does not
change.
• Revise compliance document to
automate compliance calculations
• Existing conditions could be
documented via as-builts or
photographs. Some market actors
supportive of ATT verification.
• Modeling software will need to be
updated to include proposed values.
Software training updates.
• Clear code requirements that apply to
the project.
• Designation on products about whether
or not they meet code requirements.
How to/direction on how to specify the
products that meet the code (lighting
designer is not purchasing the lighting
fixtures, the contractor purchases).
• Examples showing systems that are
Title 24 compliant.
• Examples showing systems that are not
Title 24 compliant with explanations of
why they are not.
• Documents showing exactly what their
role in Title 24 compliance is/how to
complete compliance tasks.
• Documents explaining who they can
speak with for help on code
compliance.
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 128
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 51
Market
Actor Task(s) In Compliance Process Objective(s) in Completing
Compliance Tasks
How Proposed Code
Change Could Impact
Work Flow
Opportunities to Minimize Negative
Impacts of Compliance Requirement
Contractor
/Builder
• Follow the lighting design and
specifications provided by the
lighting designer.
• They should only need to
follow the design, but it is
helpful for them to understand
the code in case they need to
make substitutions in
products.
• They are responsible for
following what is in the design
– if they do not, the system can
end up not being in
compliance. They complete
installation compliance
documents.
• Coordinate with lighting
designer in case issues with
installation arise.
• They purchase/install products
specified by design. It is
helpful for them to know what
products meet compliance in
case they need to substitute
products.
• Will need to know
BUG rating of lower
wattage products
due to lowered
threshold of BUG
rating for fixtures.
• Clear documentation of Title 24, Part 6
compliant products.
• Clear documentation illustrating
difference between old standards and
new one.
• Clear documentation explaining who
they can speak with for help on code
compliance.
• Examples showing systems that are
Title 24 compliant.
• Examples showing systems that are not
Title 24 compliant with explanations of
why they are not.
Electrician • Need to understand the code
as they might be responsible
for designing lighting
systems.
• They might play a similar role
to contractor/builder and
follow lighting design/install
lighting equipment.
• If designing the system, they
are responsible for ensuring it
follows the code. They would
also be responsible for filling
out design compliance
documents.
• If building the system, they are
responsible for following what
is in the design – if they do
not, the system can end up out
of compliance. They would
complete installation
compliance documents.
• Coordinate with lighting
designer in case issues with
installation arise.
• Purchase/install products
specified by design that are
compliant.
• If designing a
system, will need to
learn new, more
stringent LPAs.
• Will need to apply
new cutoff wattage
for BUG rating.
• Clear documentation of Title 24, Part 6
compliant products.
• Clear documentation illustrating
difference between old standards and
new one.
• Clear documentation explaining who
they can speak with for help on code
compliance.
• Examples showing systems that are
Title 24 compliant.
• Examples showing systems that are not
Title 24 compliant with explanations of
why they are not.
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 129
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 52
Market
Actor Task(s) In Compliance Process Objective(s) in Completing
Compliance Tasks
How Proposed Code
Change Could Impact
Work Flow
Opportunities to Minimize Negative
Impacts of Compliance Requirement
Title 24
Consultant
• Experts on Title 24, Part 6
and compliance/compliance
documents/compliance steps.
• They are hired by
designers/building owners to
help interpret the code/ensure
compliance/fill out
paperwork.
• Coordinate with designers,
installers, building owners, and
compliance agencies.
• They generate compliance
documentation as well as
provide assistance in code
interpretation.
• Will need to know
the new, more
stringent standards.
• Document explaining Title 24 process
and where documents go/who needs to
sign what.
• Modeling software will need to be
updated to include proposed values.
Software training updates.
• Clear code requirements that apply to
the project.
• Designation on products about whether
or not they meet code requirements.
How to/direction on how to specify the
products that meet the code (lighting
designer is not purchasing the lighting
fixtures, the contractor purchases).
• Examples showing systems that are
Title 24 compliant.
• Examples showing systems that are not
Title 24 compliant with explanations of
why they are not.
• Documents explaining who they can
speak with for help on code
compliance.
Building
Owner
• Coordinate with
designers/contractors and fill
out appropriate paperwork.
They must also ensure proper
compliance paperwork is
filled out/signed/submitted to
appropriate entities.
• Need to ensure paperwork is
sent to proper places and their
system is up to code.
• Coordinate with contractors,
designers, and compliance
enforcement agencies.
• Will need to know
the standards have
changed and what
the changes are.
• Clear documentation of code
requirements.
• Clear documentation of everything that
needs to be completed for code
requirements.
• Clear documentation of what
compliance paperwork goes where, and
the steps of the process.
• Documents explaining who they can
speak with for help on code
compliance.
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 130
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 53
Market
Actor Task(s) In Compliance Process Objective(s) in Completing
Compliance Tasks
How Proposed Code
Change Could Impact
Work Flow
Opportunities to Minimize Negative
Impacts of Compliance Requirement
Plan
Checker
• Identify relevant
requirements.
• Confirm data on documents is
compliant.
• Confirm plans/ specifications
match data on documents.
• Provide correction comments
if necessary.
• Quickly and easily determine
requirements based on scope.
• Quickly and easily determine
if data in documents meets
requirements.
• Quickly and easily determine
if plans/ specs match
documents.
• Quickly and easily provide
correction comments that will
resolve issue.
• Coordinate with building
owners/designers/inspectors.
• Will need to verify
calculations are
compliant with new
standards.
• Will need to verify
existing conditions
baseline.
• Clear code language that is easily
understandable. Clear instructions on
where to find everything in the plans.
• Clear documentation of what
paperwork they need to receive and/or
other tasks they need to perform.
• Clear documentation of how the new
code differs from the old.
• Compliance document could auto-
verify data is compliant with Standards.
• Existing conditions documented via as-
builts or photos or ATT. Do not require
additional field visit by Authority
Having Jurisdiction.
• Document compliance on documents in
a way easily compared to plans.
• Examples of plans that are in
compliance.
• Examples of plans that are not in
compliance and reasons why they are
not.
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 131
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 54
Market
Actor Task(s) In Compliance Process Objective(s) in Completing
Compliance Tasks
How Proposed Code
Change Could Impact
Work Flow
Opportunities to Minimize Negative
Impacts of Compliance Requirement
Building
Inspector
• Identify relevant
requirements.
• Confirm installed equipment
matches documents/plans.
• Provide correction comments
if necessary.
• Quickly and easily determine
requirements based on scope.
• Quickly and easily determine
if installation meets
requirements and matches
documents/plans.
• Quickly and easily provide
correction comments that will
resolve issue.
• Coordinate with building
owners/designers/plan
checkers.
• Will need to verify
installations are
compliant with new
standards.
• Clear documentation of code
requirements, although they probably
rely more on the plan checker to make
sure everything in the plan is up to
code.
• Clear documentation of how the new
code differs from the old.
• Clear documentation of the different
types of technologies that might be
used/installed and equivalences – if
something installed is different from the
plans, then the inspector needs to know
whether or not it is still in code
compliance.
• Clear documentation of what
paperwork they need to receive and/or
other tasks they need to perform.
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 132
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 55
Appendix C: TARGET I LLUMINANCE L EVELS
Hardscape Target Illuminance
Parking lot lighting levels are taken from IES RP-20-14, until this recommended practice is revised with new research by Virginia Tech
Transportation Institute or lighting zone multipliers are included. The recommended lighting levels in RP-20-14 can be found in Table 40.
Table 40: IES RP -20-2014 Recommended Maintained Illuminance Values for Parking Lots
Minimum Horizontal
Footcandles (FC)
Minimum Vertical Footcandles
(FC)
Maximum Average: Minimum
Uniformity Ratio
Asphalt Surfaces: Pre-curfew 0.5 0.25 4:1
Asphalt Surfaces: Post-curfew 0.2 0.10 4:1
Concrete Surfaces: Pre-curfew 1.0 0.50 4:1
Concrete Surfaces: Post-curfew 0.2 0.10 4:1
The lighting industry has raised concerns that the recommended parking lot lighting levels result in over lighting. Virginia Tech Transportation
Institute (VTTI) is researching the lighting levels to avoid hazards in a parking lot. These findings will be used to revise RP-20, and provide
lighting recommendations that are appropriate for each lighting zone. This research is expected to be completed by the third quarter of 2017. IES
adoption of the revised RP-20 could occur during the fourth quarter of 2017.
In the meantime, the parking lot lighting calculations are based on the current RP-20-14 pre-curfew lighting level recommendations. Due to the
increases in LED efficiencies over the last three years, it is expected that the proposed LPA for general hardscape applications can be reduced.
Further reductions will be able to be made to the general hardscape LPAs if VTTI’s findings are approved by IES and incorporated into the new
RP-20 in the third quarter of 2017.
Specific Applications Target Illuminances
The target illuminance values proposed for the 2019 code cycle are found in Table 41: 2019 Target Illuminance Criteria. These proposed lighting
levels are taken from current IES recommendations and the California Financial Code ATM lighting requirements.
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 133
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 56
Table 41: 2019 Target Illuminance Criteria
Lighting Zone 0 Lighting Zone 1 Lighting Zone 2 Lighting Zone 3 Lighting Zone 4
Area Wattage Allowance (AWA)
Not Applicable
RP-20-14 "Parking
Lot - Pre-curfew"
Asphalt 0.5
Horizontal FC Min,
4:1 Avg:Min Asphalt
0.25 Vertical FC Min,
4:1 Avg:Min
Concrete 1.0
Horizontal FC Min,
4:1 Avg:Min
Concrete 0.5 Vertical
HF Min, 4:1 Avg:Min
RP-20-14 "Parking
Lot - Pre-curfew"
Asphalt 0.5
Horizontal FC Min,
4:1 Avg:Min
Asphalt 0.25 Vertical
FC Min, 4:1 Avg:Min
Concrete 1.0
Horizontal FC Min,
4:1 Avg:Min
Concrete 0.5 Vertical
HF Min, 4:1 Avg:Min
RP-20-14 "Parking
Lot - Pre-curfew"
Asphalt 0.5
Horizontal FC Min,
4:1 Avg:Min
Asphalt 0.25 Vertical
FC Min, 4:1 Avg:Min
Concrete 1.0
Horizontal FC Min,
4:1 Avg:Min
Concrete 0.5 Vertical
HF Min, 4:1 Avg:Min
RP-20-14 "Parking
Lot - Pre-curfew"
Asphalt 0.5
Horizontal FC Min,
4:1 Avg:Min
Asphalt 0.25 Vertical
FC Min, 4:1 Avg:Min
Concrete 1.0
Horizontal FC Min,
4:1 Avg:Min
Concrete 0.5 Vertical
HF Min, 4:1 Avg:Min
Linear Wattage Allowance (LWA)
Initial Wattage Allowance (IWA)
Building Entrances or Exits.
Allowance per door. Luminaires
qualifying for this allowance shall be
within 20 feet of the door.
Not Applicable
HB10 T22.2 "Non-
Covered Entries/Exits
- Medium Activity
LZ1"
1.0 Horizontal FC
Avg, 2:1 Avg:Min
0.4 Vertical FC Avg,
4:1 Avg:Min
HB10 T22.2 "Non-
Covered Entries/Exits
- Medium Activity
LZ2"
1.0 Horizontal FC
Avg, 2:1 Avg:Min
0.6 Vertical FC Avg,
4:1 Avg:Min
HB10 T22.2 "Non-
Covered Entries/Exits
- Medium Activity
LZ3"
1.0 Horizontal FC
Avg, 2:1 Avg:Min
0.8 Vertical FC Avg,
4:1 Avg:Min
HB10 T22.2 "Non-
Covered Entries/Exits
- Medium Activity
LZ4"
1.0 Horizontal FC
Avg, 2:1 Avg:Min
1.0 Vertical FC Avg,
2:1 Avg:Min
Primary Entrances to Senior Care
Facilities, Police Stations, Hospitals,
Fire Stations, and Emergency
Vehicle Facilities. Allowance per
primary entrance(s) only. Primary
entrances shall provide access for the
general public and shall not be used
exclusively for staff or service
personnel. This allowance shall be in
addition to the building entrance or
exit allowance above. Luminaires
qualifying for this allowance shall be
within 100 feet of the primary
entrance.
Not Applicable
HB10 T22.2
"Building Entries,
Porte Cocheres - High
Activity for Elderly
LZ1"
2.0 Horizontal FC
Avg, 2:1 Avg:Min
1.5 Vertical FC Avg,
4:1 Avg:Min
HB10 T22.2
"Building Entries,
Porte Cocheres - High
Activity for Elderly
LZ2"
4.0 Horizontal FC
Avg, 2:1 Avg:Min
2.0 Vertical FC Avg,
4:1 Avg:Min
HB10 T22.2
"Building Entries,
Porte Cocheres - High
Activity for Elderly
LZ3"
5.0 Horizontal FC
Avg, 2:1 Avg:Min
3.0 Vertical FC Avg,
4:1 Avg:Min
HB10 T22.2
"Building Entries,
Porte Cocheres - High
Activity for Elderly
LZ4"
7.5 Horizontal FC
Avg, 2:1 Avg:Min
4.0 Vertical FC Avg,
2:1 Avg:Min
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 134
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 57
Lighting Zone 0 Lighting Zone 1 Lighting Zone 2 Lighting Zone 3 Lighting Zone 4
Drive Up Windows. Allowance per
customer service location.
Luminaires qualifying for this
allowance shall be within 2 mounting
heights of the sill of the window.
Not Applicable
HB10 T31.2 "Drive-
Up Financial Services
- Covered LZ1"
2.0 Horizontal FC
Avg, 3:1 Avg:Min
0.8 Vertical FC Avg,
6:1 Avg:Min
HB10 T31.2 "Drive-
Up Financial Services
- Covered LZ2"
3.0 Horizontal FC
Avg, 3:1 Avg:Min
1.0 Vertical FC Avg,
6:1 Avg:Min
HB10 T31.2 "Drive-
Up Financial Services
- Covered LZ3"
4.0 Horizontal FC
Avg, 3:1 Avg:Min
1.5 Vertical FC Avg,
6:1 Avg:Min
HB10 T31.2 "Drive-
Up Financial Services
- Covered LZ4"
5.0 Horizontal FC
Avg, 3:1 Avg:Min
2.0 Vertical FC Avg,
3:1 Avg:Min
Vehicle Service Station Uncovered
Fuel Dispenser. Allowance per
fueling dispenser. Luminaires
qualifying for this allowance shall be
within 2 mounting heights of the
dispenser.
Not Applicable
HB10 T34.2 "Service
Stations Dispensing
Islands - Medium
Activity LZ1"
5.0 Horizontal FC
Avg, 4:1 Avg:Min
5.0 Vertical FC Avg,
8:1 Avg:Min
HB10 T34.2 "Service
Stations Dispensing
Islands - Medium
Activity LZ2"
7.5 Horizontal FC
Avg, 4:1 Avg:Min
7.5 Vertical FC Avg,
8:1 Avg:Min
HB10 T34.2 "Service
Stations Dispensing
Islands - Medium
Activity LZ3"
10.0 Horizontal FC
Avg, 4:1 Avg:Min
10.0 Vertical FC Avg,
8:1 Avg:Min
HB10 T34.2 "Service
Stations Dispensing
Islands - Medium
Activity LZ4"
15.0 Horizontal FC
Avg, 4:1 Avg:Min
15.0 Vertical FC Avg,
4:1 Avg:Min
ATM Machine Lighting. Allowance
per ATM machine. Luminaires
qualifying for this allowance shall be
within 50 feet of the dispenser.
Not Applicable
California Financial
Code 13041
10.0 Horizontal FC
Min within 5ft
2.0 Horizontal FC
Min within 60ft
10.0 Vertical FC Min
on machine face
California Financial
Code 13041
10.0 Horizontal FC
Min within 5ft
2.0 Horizontal FC
Min within 60ft
10.0 Vertical FC Min
on machine face
California Financial
Code 13041
10.0 Horizontal FC
Min within 5ft
2.0 Horizontal FC
Min within 60ft
10.0 Vertical FC Min
on machine face
California Financial
Code 13041
10.0 Horizontal FC
Min within 5ft
2.0 Horizontal FC
Min within 60ft
10.0 Vertical FC Min
on machine face
Outdoor Sales Frontage. Allowance
for frontage immediately adjacent to
the principal viewing location(s) and
unobstructed for its viewing length.
A corner sales lot may include two
adjacent sides provided that a
different principal viewing location
exists for each side. Luminaires
qualifying for this allowance shall be
located between the principal
viewing location and the frontage
outdoor sales area.
Not Applicable
NO ALLOWANCE
HB10 T34.2
"Automotive Sales
Front Row - Medium
Activity LZ1"
7.5 Horizontal FC
Avg, 3:1 Avg:Min
7.5 Vertical FC Avg,
6:1 Avg:Min
HB10 T34.2
"Automotive Sales
Front Row - Medium
Activity LZ2"
10.0 Horizontal FC
Avg, 3:1 Avg:Min
10.0 Vertical FC Avg,
6:1 Avg:Min
HB10 T34.2
"Automotive Sales
Front Row - Medium
Activity LZ3"
15.0 Horizontal FC
Avg, 3:1 Avg:Min
15.0 Vertical FC Avg,
6:1 Avg:Min
HB10 T34.2
"Automotive Sales
Front Row - Medium
Activity LZ4"
20.0 Horizontal FC
Avg, 3:1 Avg:Min
20.0 Vertical FC Avg,
3:1 Avg:Min
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 135
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 58
Lighting Zone 0 Lighting Zone 1 Lighting Zone 2 Lighting Zone 3 Lighting Zone 4
Hardscape Ornamental Lighting.
Allowance for the total site
illuminated hardscape area.
Luminaires qualifying for this
allowance shall be rated for 100
watts or less as determined in
accordance with Section 130(d), and
shall be post-top luminaires, lanterns,
pendant luminaires, or chandeliers.
Not Applicable
NO ALLOWANCE
HB10 T34.2 "Centers,
Outdoor, Plazas and
Town Squares -
Medium Activity
LZ1"
0.1 Horizontal FC
Avg, 5:1 Avg:Min
0 Vertical FC Avg
HB10 T34.2 "Centers,
Outdoor, Plazas and
Town Squares -
Medium Activity
LZ2"
0.2 Horizontal FC
Avg, 5:1 Avg:Min
0.1 Vertical FC Avg,
10:1 Avg:Min
HB10 T34.2 "Centers,
Outdoor, Plazas and
Town Squares -
Medium Activity
LZ3"
0.4 Horizontal FC
Avg, 5:1 Avg:Min
0.2 Vertical FC Avg,
10:1 Avg:Min
HB10 T34.2 "Centers,
Outdoor, Plazas and
Town Squares -
Medium Activity
LZ4"
0.6 Horizontal FC
Avg, 5:1 Avg:Min
0.2 Vertical FC Avg,
5:1 Avg:Min
Building Facades. Only areas of
building façade that are illuminated
shall qualify for this allowance.
Luminaires qualifying for this
allowance shall be aimed at the
façade and shall be capable of
illuminating it without obstruction or
interference by permanent building
features or other objects.
Not Applicable
NO ALLOWANCE
HB10 T26.2 "Façade
Fields - Medium
Activity LZ1
Reflectance ≥ 50%"
1.5 FC AVG
HB10 T26.2 "Façade
Fields - Medium
Activity LZ2
Reflectance ≥ 50%"
2 FC AVG
HB10 T26.2 "Façade
Fields - Medium
Activity LZ3
Reflectance ≥ 50%"
3 FC AVG
HB10 T26.2 "Façade
Fields - Medium
Activity LZ4
Reflectance ≥ 50%"
4 FC AVG
Outdoor Sales Lots. Allowance for
uncovered sales lots used exclusively
for the display of vehicles or other
merchandise for sale. Driveways,
parking lots or other non-sales areas
shall be considered hardscape areas
even if these areas are completely
surrounded by sales lot on all sides.
Luminaires qualifying for this
allowance shall be within 5 mounting
heights of the sales lot area.
Not Applicable
HB10 T34.2
"Automotive Sales,
Sales - Medium
Activity LZ1"
4.0 Horizontal FC
Avg, 3:1 Avg:Min
2.0 Vertical FC Avg,
6:1 Avg:Min
HB10 T34.2
"Automotive Sales,
Sales - Medium
Activity LZ2"
5.0 Horizontal FC
Avg, 3:1 Avg:Min
3.0 Vertical FC Avg,
6:1 Avg:Min
HB10 T34.2
"Automotive Sales,
Sales - Medium
Activity LZ3"
7.5 Horizontal FC
Avg, 3:1 Avg:Min
4.0 Vertical FC Avg,
6:1 Avg:Min
HB10 T34.2
"Automotive Sales,
Sales - Medium
Activity LZ4"
10.0 Horizontal FC
Avg, 3:1 Avg:Min
5.0 Vertical FC Avg,
3:1 Avg:Min
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 136
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 59
Lighting Zone 0 Lighting Zone 1 Lighting Zone 2 Lighting Zone 3 Lighting Zone 4
Vehicle Service Station Hardscape.
Allowance for the total illuminated
hardscape area less area of buildings,
under canopies, off property, or
obstructed by signs or structures.
Luminaires qualifying for this
allowance shall be illuminating the
hardscape area and shall not be
within a building, below a canopy,
beyond property lines, or obstructed
by a sign or other structure.
Not Applicable
HB10 T34.2 "Service
Stations Outdoor
Service - Medium
Activity LZ1"
1.5 Horizontal FC
Avg, 2:1 Avg:Min
1.5 Vertical FC Avg,
4:1 Avg:Min
HB10 T34.2 "Service
Stations Outdoor
Service - Medium
Activity LZ2"
2.0 Horizontal FC
Avg, 2:1 Avg:Min
2.0 Vertical FC Avg,
4:1 Avg:Min
HB10 T34.2 "Service
Stations Outdoor
Service - Medium
Activity LZ3"
3.0 Horizontal FC
Avg, 2:1 Avg:Min
3.0 Vertical FC Avg,
4:1 Avg:Min
HB10 T34.2 "Service
Stations Outdoor
Service - Medium
Activity LZ4"
4.0 Horizontal FC
Avg, 2:1 Avg:Min
4.0 Vertical FC Avg,
2:1 Avg:Min
Vehicle Service Station Canopies.
Allowance for the total area within
the drip line of the canopy.
Luminaires qualifying for this
allowance shall be located under the
canopy.
Not Applicable
HB10 T34.2 "Service
Stations Dispensing
Islands - Medium
Activity LZ1"
5.0 Horizontal FC
Avg, 4:1 Avg:Min
5.0 Vertical FC Avg,
8:1 Avg:Min
HB10 T34.2 "Service
Stations Dispensing
Islands - Medium
Activity LZ2"
7.5 Horizontal FC
Avg, 4:1 Avg:Min
7.5 Vertical FC Avg,
8:1 Avg:Min
HB10 T34.2 "Service
Stations Dispensing
Islands - Medium
Activity LZ3"
10.0 Horizontal FC
Avg, 4:1 Avg:Min
10.0 Vertical FC Avg,
8:1 Avg:Min
HB10 T34.2 "Service
Stations Dispensing
Islands - Medium
Activity LZ4"
15.0 Horizontal FC
Avg, 4:1 Avg:Min
15.0 Vertical FC Avg,
4:1 Avg:Min
Sales Canopies. Allowance for the
total area within the drip line of the
canopy. Luminaires qualifying for
this allowance shall be located under
the canopy.
Not Applicable
HB10 T34.2
"Seasonal Open-Air
Merchandise - LZ1"
1.5 Horizontal FC
Avg, 2:1 Avg:Min
1.5 Vertical FC Avg,
4:1 Avg:Min
HB10 T34.2
"Seasonal Open-Air
Merchandise - LZ2"
2.0 Horizontal FC
Avg, 2:1 Avg:Min
2.0 Vertical FC Avg,
4:1 Avg:Min
HB10 T34.2
"Seasonal Open-Air
Merchandise - LZ3"
3.0 Horizontal FC
Avg, 2:1 Avg:Min
3.0 Vertical FC Avg,
4:1 Avg:Min
HB10 T34.2
"Seasonal Open-Air
Merchandise - LZ4"
4.0 Horizontal FC
Avg, 2:1 Avg:Min
4.0 Vertical FC Avg,
4:1 Avg:Min
Non-sales Canopies and Tunnels.
Allowance for the total area within
the drip line of the canopy or inside
the tunnel. Luminaires qualifying for
this allowance shall be located under
the canopy or tunnel.
Not Applicable
HB10 T22.2
"Canopied Entries -
Medium Activity
LZ1"
0.8 Horizontal FC
Avg, 2:1 Avg:Min
0.4 Vertical FC Avg,
4:1 Avg:Min
HB10 T22.2
"Canopied Entries -
Medium Activity
LZ2"
1.0 Horizontal FC
Avg, 2:1 Avg:Min
0.6 Vertical FC Avg,
4:1 Avg:Min
HB10 T22.2
"Canopied Entries -
Medium Activity
LZ3"
1.5 Horizontal FC
Avg, 2:1 Avg:Min
0.8 Vertical FC Avg,
4:1 Avg:Min
HB10 T22.2
"Canopied Entries -
Medium Activity
LZ1"
2.0 Horizontal FC
Avg, 2:1 Avg:Min
1.0 Vertical FC Avg,
2:1 Avg:Min
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 137
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 60
Lighting Zone 0 Lighting Zone 1 Lighting Zone 2 Lighting Zone 3 Lighting Zone 4
Guard Stations. Allowance up to
1,000 square feet per vehicle lane.
Guard stations provide access to
secure areas controlled by security
personnel who stop and may inspect
vehicles and vehicle occupants,
including identification,
documentation, vehicle license
plates, and vehicle contents.
Qualifying luminaires shall be within
2 mounting heights of a vehicle lane
or the guardhouse.
Not Applicable
HB10 T22.2 "Remote
Monitored Site Gated
Entries - Vehicles
LZ1"
1.0 Horizontal FC
Avg, 2:1 Avg:Min
0.8 Vertical FC Avg,
4:1 Avg:Min
HB10 T22.2 "Remote
Monitored Site Gated
Entries - Vehicles
LZ2"
1.5 Horizontal FC
Avg, 2:1 Avg:Min
1.0 Vertical FC Avg,
4:1 Avg:Min
HB10 T22.2 "Remote
Monitored Site Gated
Entries - Vehicles
LZ3"
2.0 Horizontal FC
Avg, 2:1 Avg:Min
1.5 Vertical FC Avg,
4:1 Avg:Min
HB10 T22.2 "Remote
Monitored Site Gated
Entries - Vehicles
LZ4"
3.0 Horizontal FC
Avg, 2:1 Avg:Min
2.0 Vertical FC Avg,
2:1 Avg:Min
Student Pick-up/Drop-off zone.
Allowance for the area of the student
pick-up/drop-off zone, with or
without canopy, for preschool
through 12th grade school campuses.
A student pick-up/drop off zone is a
curbside, controlled traffic area on a
school campus where students are
picked-up and dropped off from
vehicles. The allowed area shall be
the smaller of the actual width or 25
feet, times the smaller of the actual
length or 250 feet. Qualifying
luminaires shall be within 2
mounting heights of the student pick-
up/drop-off zone.
Not Applicable
NO ALLOWANCE
HB10 T36.2
"Aviation Terminals
Covered Bus and
Shuttle Pick-
Up/Drop-Off -
Medium Activity
LZ1"
0.8 Horizontal FC
Avg, 2:1 Avg:Min
0.4 Vertical FC Avg,
4:1 Avg:Min
HB10 T36.2
"Aviation Terminals
Covered Bus and
Shuttle Pick-
Up/Drop-Off -
Medium Activity
LZ2"
1.0 Horizontal FC
Avg, 2:1 Avg:Min
0.6 Vertical FC Avg,
4:1 Avg:Min
HB10 T36.2
"Aviation Terminals
Covered Bus and
Shuttle Pick-
Up/Drop-Off -
Medium Activity
LZ3"
1.5 Horizontal FC
Avg, 2:1 Avg:Min
0.8 Vertical FC Avg,
4:1 Avg:Min
NO ALLOWANCE
HB10 T36.2
"Aviation Terminals
Covered Bus and
Shuttle Pick-
Up/Drop-Off -
Medium Activity
LZ4"
2.0 Horizontal FC
Avg, 2:1 Avg:Min
1.0 Vertical FC Avg,
2:1 Avg:Min
Outdoor Dining. Allowance for the
total illuminated hardscape of
outdoor dining. Outdoor dining areas
are hardscape areas used to serve and
consume food and beverages.
Qualifying luminaires shall be within
2 mounting heights of the hardscape
area of outdoor dining.
Not Applicable
HB10 T22.2 "Food
Service, Restaurants -
Fine Dining"
3.0 Horizontal FC
Avg, 3:1 Avg:Min1.0
Vertical FC Avg, 3:1
Avg:Min
HB10 T22.2 "Food
Service, Restaurants -
Fine Dining"
3.0 Horizontal FC
Avg, 3:1 Avg:Min1.0
Vertical FC Avg, 3:1
Avg:Min
HB10 T22.2 "Food
Service, Restaurants -
Fine Dining"
3.0 Horizontal FC
Avg, 3:1 Avg:Min1.0
Vertical FC Avg, 3:1
Avg:Min
HB10 T22.2 "Food
Service, Restaurants -
Fine Dining"
3.0 Horizontal FC
Avg, 3:1 Avg:Min1.0
Vertical FC Avg, 3:1
Avg:Min
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 138
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 61
Lighting Zone 0 Lighting Zone 1 Lighting Zone 2 Lighting Zone 3 Lighting Zone 4
Special Security Lighting for Retail
Parking and Pedestrian Hardscape.
This additional allowance is for
illuminated retail parking and
pedestrian hardscape identified as
having special security needs. This
allowance shall be in addition to the
building entrance or exit allowance.
Not Applicable
G-1-03 T1
"Supermarket, Major
Retail Parking -
Parking Lot"
3.0 Horizontal FC
Avg; 4:1 Avg:Min
G-1-03 T1
"Supermarket, Major
Retail Parking -
Parking Lot"
3.0 Horizontal FC
Avg; 4:1 Avg:Min
G-1-03 T1
"Supermarket, Major
Retail Parking -
Parking Lot"
3.0 Horizontal FC
Avg; 4:1 Avg:Min
NO ALLOWANCE
G-1-03 T1
"Supermarket, Major
Retail Parking -
Parking Lot"
3.0 Horizontal FC
Avg; 4:1 Avg:Min
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 139
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 62
Appendix D: N ONR ESIDENTIAL U SE S CHEDULES
The energy savings per application were based on the following nonresidential electric use schedules. While LED luminaires can often be
dimmed to twenty percent or lower, legacy products such as Pulse Start Metal Halide (PSMH) luminaire have bi-level motion controls that dim
the lights to fifty percent. The partial-off and bi-level control requirements from the 2016 Title 24, Part 6 code cycle were considered for the
schedules listed below. The Statewide CASE Team assumed spaces with pole mounted lighting would have a mix of controls depending on the
height of the poles. These spaces were assumed to have different lighting schedules, based on mounting-height dependent control requirements:
one schedule for luminaires mounted more than 24 feet from the ground, which are controlled primarily by scheduling and photocontrols; and
one schedule for luminaires mounted less than 24 feet above the ground, which require additional motion-based controls. The Statewide CASE
Team assumed that roughly 78 percent of pole mounted light fixtures were above 24 feet and 22 percent were mounted below 24 feet. The
following schedules are based on industry observations.
The schedules shown in Table 39 document the schedule applied to the general hardscape and specific applications, which were used to
determine energy savings. The separate schedule dimming profiles for both winter and summer months are shown in Figure 1 to Figure 10.
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 140
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 63
Table 42: Application Use Schedules
Application Schedule Type Annual Full Load Hours
General Hardscape General Hardscape, A Dusk-30min to Dawn+30min, Bi-
level motion sensor
4263
Building Entrances and Exits A with Bi-level motion sensor 4690
Primary Entrances A Dusk-30min to Dawn+30min 4690
Drive-Up Windows Retail Dusk-30min to Dawn+30min 3193
Uncovered Fuel Dispenser A Dusk-30min to Dawn+30min 4690
ATM ATM with Partial Off 4690
Outdoor Sales Frontage C Dusk-30min to Dawn+30min 1932
Hardscape Ornamental Lighting A Dusk-30min to Dawn+30min 4690
Building Facades D Dusk-30min to Dawn+30min 3193
Outdoor Sales Lots Outdoor Sales Lots, A Dusk-30min to Dawn+30min, Bi-
level motion sensor
4357
Vehicle Service Station Hardscape Service Station Hardscape, A Dusk-30min to Dawn+30min, Bi-
level motion sensor
4459
Vehicle Service Station Canopies Service Station Canopies, A with Partial Off, Bi-level motion
sensor
4459
Sales Canopies Retail Dusk-30min to Dawn+30min 3193
Non-sales Canopies and Pedestrian
Tunnels A with Partial Off 4690
Guard Stations A Dusk-30min to Dawn+30min 4690
Student Pick-up/Drop-off Zones B Dusk-30min to Dawn+30min 1567
Outdoor Dining Outdoor Dining Dusk-30min to Dawn+30min 1932
Special Security Lighting for Retail
Parking and Pedestrian Hardscape A with Partial Off 4690
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 141
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 64
Figure 1: General Hardscape schedule showing percentage of rated power (y-axis) and hours in a day (x-axis).
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 142
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 65
Figure 2: Schedule A showing percentage of rated power (y-axis) and hours in a day (x-axis).
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 143
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 66
Figure 3: Schedule B showing percentage of rated power (y-axis) and hours in a day (x-axis).
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 144
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 67
Figure 4: Schedule C showing percentage of rated power (y-axis) and hours in a day (x-axis).
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 145
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 68
Figure 5: Schedule D showing percentage of rated power (y-axis) and hours in a day (x-axis).
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 146
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 69
Figure 6: Retail schedule showing percentage of rated power (y-axis) and hours in a day (x-axis).
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 147
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 70
Figure 7: Service station hardscape schedule showing percentage of rated power (y-axis) and hours in a day (x-axis).
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 148
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 71
Figure 8: Service station canopies schedule showing percentage of rated power (y-axis) and hours in a day (x-axis).
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 149
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 72
Figure 9: ATM schedule showing percentage of rated power (y-axis) and hours in a day (x-axis).
Figure 10: Outdoor dining schedule showing percentage of rated power (y-axis) and hours in a day (x-axis).
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 150
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 73
Appendix E: L IGHTING M ODELS
The General Hardscape proposed effective area wattage allowances (eAWA) are based on three real design site models, used to determine cost
impacts, and nine prototype sites used to provide a reasonable understanding of the eAWA for multiple site conditions.
The three real designs calculations are a valid approach applied in the 2016 code cycle that demonstrate advantages to improvements in LED
technology that affect luminaire quantity, pole height, and pole spacing. LED technology has made significant advancements in the last three
years and more products are available on the market with higher efficacy 3000K LEDs. Figure 11 provides the site geometry of the three models
selected from an evaluation of actual parking lots in California represent the General Hardscape designs. These designs were used to determine a
sampling of LED luminaires that were used in the unit cost calculations.
Figure 11: Three site models used for real design calculations.
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 151
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 74
Table 43: General Hardscape 2016 LED Cost Impact
LZ1-A LZ2-A LZ2-C LZ3-A LZ3-C LZ4-A LZ4-C Luminaire
ID
Reported
Life
Lx at
60,000hr
Luminaire
Wattage
2017
Luminaire
Cost
2017 $/W LZ1-A LZ2-A LZ2-C LZ3-A LZ3-C LZ4-A
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 PL01 100,000 0.990 45 630$ 14.00$ -$ -$ -$ 12,441$ -$ -$
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 PL03 100,000 0.990 52 830$ 15.96$ -$ -$ -$ 3,546$ -$ -$
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.22 PL05 100,000 0.990 68 831$ 12.22$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 PL06 60,000 0.930 75 867$ 11.56$ 3,399$ -$ -$ -$ 3,886$ -$
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 PL07 60,000 0.930 75 905$ 12.07$ -$ -$ -$ 5,362$ -$ -$
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 PL08 60,000 0.700 133 1,685$ 12.67$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 8,518$ -$
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 PL09 60,000 0.700 72 1,497$ 20.79$ -$ -$ -$ 4,619$ -$ -$
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 PL11 100,000 0.840 45 742$ 16.49$ -$ -$ -$ 3,663$ -$ -$
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 PL12 100,000 0.840 47 742$ 15.79$ -$ -$ -$ 42,088$ -$ -$
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 PL13 154,000 0.910 54 1,220$ 22.59$ -$ -$ -$ 5,019$ -$ -$
0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PL14 100,000 0.887 107 1,344$ 12.56$ -$ -$ 3,983$ -$ -$ -$
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 PL15 100,000 0.887 86 1,407$ 16.36$ -$ -$ -$ 7,269$ -$ -$
0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PL16 100,000 0.887 20 1,218$ 60.90$ 35,817$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
0.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PL17 100,000 0.887 29 1,218$ 42.00$ 49,402$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
0.14 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.00 0.00 PL18 100,000 0.887 37 1,282$ 34.65$ 25,472$ 7,547$ 10,988$ 7,698$ 11,647$ -$
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 PL19 90,000 0.864 47 1,218$ 25.91$ -$ -$ -$ 5,757$ -$ -$
0.00 0.11 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 PL20 100,000 0.887 55 1,282$ 23.31$ -$ 20,309$ -$ 15,535$ -$ -$
0.03 0.08 0.28 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.00 PL21 100,000 0.887 55 1,344$ 24.44$ 3,593$ 15,969$ 77,492$ -$ 41,072$ -$
0.00 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PL22 100,000 0.887 73 1,407$ 19.27$ -$ 16,794$ -$ -$ -$ -$
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 PL23 100,000 0.887 73 1,282$ 17.56$ -$ -$ -$ 3,902$ -$ -$
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 PL24 100,000 0.887 78 1,344$ 17.23$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 11,584$ -$
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.33 0.33 PL25 100,000 0.887 86 1,470$ 17.09$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 11,492$ 72,993$
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 PL26 154,000 0.910 69 1,283$ 18.59$ -$ -$ -$ 12,393$ -$ -$
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PL27 154,000 0.910 87 1,344$ 15.45$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PL29 150,000 0.950 14 1,030$ 73.57$ 75,720$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
0.03 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 PL30 150,000 0.950 27 1,118$ 41.41$ 6,088$ -$ -$ 18,399$ -$ -$
0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PL31 150,000 0.950 27 1,030$ 38.15$ 16,827$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
0.00 0.33 0.33 0.07 0.32 0.33 0.22 PL32 150,000 0.950 55 1,118$ 20.33$ -$ 53,134$ 77,354$ 13,548$ 81,998$ 86,804$
0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PL33 150,000 0.950 55 1,118$ 20.33$ 2,989$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
0.08 0.33 0.33 0.17 0.32 0.33 0.22 PL34 150,000 0.950 55 1,118$ 20.33$ 8,966$ 53,134$ 77,354$ 36,128$ 81,998$ 86,804$
0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PL35 150,000 0.950 27 1,118$ 41.41$ 6,088$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 234,361$ 166,887$ 247,171$ 197,368$ 252,195$ 246,602$
Weighting 2016 Weighted Cost
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 152
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 75
Table 44: General Hardscape 2019 LED Cost Impact
The nine site prototype models used for the hardscape allowance calculations were selected to determine the reasonable range of ratios in the
hardscape area and perimeter. Below in Figure 12, the general layout of the sites is shown to provide an understanding of the conditions that are
anticipated in the calculations. These sites vary in overall hardscape size, as can be seen in the varying amount of gray shading, which impacts
LZ1-A LZ2-A LZ2-C LZ3-A LZ3-C LZ4-A LZ4-C Luminaire
ID
Reported
Life
Lx at
60,000hr
Luminaire
Wattage
2017
Luminaire
Cost
2017 $/W LZ1-A LZ2-A LZ2-C LZ3-A LZ3-C LZ4-A
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 PL01 100,000 0.990 45 630$ 14.00$ -$ -$ -$ 8,147$ -$ -$
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 PL03 100,000 0.990 52 830$ 15.96$ -$ -$ -$ 2,322$ -$ -$
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.22 PL05 100,000 0.990 68 831$ 12.22$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 PL06 60,000 0.930 75 867$ 11.56$ 2,775$ -$ -$ -$ 2,614$ -$
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 PL07 60,000 0.930 75 905$ 12.07$ -$ -$ -$ 3,511$ -$ -$
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 PL08 60,000 0.700 133 1,685$ 12.67$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 5,729$ -$
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 PL09 60,000 0.700 72 1,497$ 20.79$ -$ -$ -$ 3,025$ -$ -$
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 PL11 100,000 0.840 45 742$ 16.49$ -$ -$ -$ 2,399$ -$ -$
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 PL12 100,000 0.840 47 742$ 15.79$ -$ -$ -$ 27,561$ -$ -$
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 PL13 154,000 0.910 54 1,220$ 22.59$ -$ -$ -$ 3,287$ -$ -$
0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PL14 100,000 0.887 107 1,344$ 12.56$ -$ -$ 2,518$ -$ -$ -$
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 PL15 100,000 0.887 86 1,407$ 16.36$ -$ -$ -$ 4,760$ -$ -$
0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PL16 100,000 0.887 20 1,218$ 60.90$ 29,236$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
0.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PL17 100,000 0.887 29 1,218$ 42.00$ 40,326$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
0.14 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.00 0.00 PL18 100,000 0.887 37 1,282$ 34.65$ 20,792$ 5,264$ 6,945$ 5,041$ 7,834$ -$
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 PL19 90,000 0.864 47 1,218$ 25.91$ -$ -$ -$ 3,770$ -$ -$
0.00 0.11 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 PL20 100,000 0.887 55 1,282$ 23.31$ -$ 14,164$ -$ 10,173$ -$ -$
0.03 0.08 0.28 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.00 PL21 100,000 0.887 55 1,344$ 24.44$ 2,933$ 11,137$ 48,979$ -$ 27,624$ -$
0.00 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PL22 100,000 0.887 73 1,407$ 19.27$ -$ 11,712$ -$ -$ -$ -$
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 PL23 100,000 0.887 73 1,282$ 17.56$ -$ -$ -$ 2,555$ -$ -$
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 PL24 100,000 0.887 78 1,344$ 17.23$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 7,791$ -$
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.33 0.33 PL25 100,000 0.887 86 1,470$ 17.09$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 7,729$ 47,074$
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 PL26 154,000 0.910 69 1,283$ 18.59$ -$ -$ -$ 8,115$ -$ -$
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PL27 154,000 0.910 87 1,344$ 15.45$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PL29 150,000 0.950 14 1,030$ 73.57$ 61,809$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
0.03 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 PL30 150,000 0.950 27 1,118$ 41.41$ 4,970$ -$ -$ 12,048$ -$ -$
0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PL31 150,000 0.950 27 1,030$ 38.15$ 13,735$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
0.00 0.33 0.33 0.07 0.32 0.33 0.22 PL32 150,000 0.950 55 1,118$ 20.33$ -$ 37,056$ 48,891$ 8,872$ 55,149$ 55,981$
0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PL33 150,000 0.950 55 1,118$ 20.33$ 2,440$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
0.08 0.33 0.33 0.17 0.32 0.33 0.22 PL34 150,000 0.950 55 1,118$ 20.33$ 7,319$ 37,056$ 48,891$ 23,658$ 55,149$ 55,981$
0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PL35 150,000 0.950 27 1,118$ 41.41$ 4,970$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 191,304$ 116,388$ 156,223$ 129,243$ 169,619$ 159,036$
Weighting 2019 Weighted Cost
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 153
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 76
the influence of the initial wattage allowance. The sites vary in both hardscape perimeter and building complexity, which impacts the perimeter
to hardscape area ratio. The square footage of these nine prototype sites are used to determine a typical effective area wattage allowance that can
be met with current technology used in the real design scenarios. The annual energy use was determined by applying the General Hardscape
nonresidential statewide schedule profile shown in Figure 1.
Figure 12: Nine site prototypes used to determine reasonable site calculations.
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 154
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 77
Table 45: General Hardscape Calculation Results and LPA Recommendations in Red
LZ1 LZ2
Asphalt
LZ2
Concrete
LZ3
Asphalt
LZ3
Concrete
LZ4
Area Wattage Allowance 0.020 0.030 0.035 0.040 0.040 0.050 Watts per Square Foot
Linear Wattage Allowance 0.150 0.250 0.700 0.350 0.700 0.450 Watts per Linear Foot
Initial Wattage Allowance 340 450 450 520 520 640 Watts
effective Area Wattage Allowance 0.037 0.054 0.079 0.071 0.086 0.089 Watts per Square Foot
effective Area Wattage Allowance 0.030 0.038 0.050 0.046 0.058 0.057 Watts per Square Foot
Limit of Reduction 0.019 0.023 0.035 0.027 0.037 0.030 Limit of Reduction
Area Wattage Allowance 0.018 0.023 0.025 0.025 0.030 0.030 Watts per Square Foot
Linear Wattage Allowance 0.150 0.170 0.400 0.250 0.400 0.350 Watts per Linear Foot
Initial Wattage Allowance 180 250 250 350 350 400 Watts
2019
2016
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 155
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 78
Table 46: 2016 LED Prototype Site Calculations
A- Long Skinny, Big BuildingB-Square, Odd BuildingC- Odd, Campus BuildingsD- Long Skinny, Small Square BuildingE- Square, Small BuildingF- Odd, Long Square BuildingG- Long Skinny, Odd BuildingH- Square, Large Square BuildingJ- Odd, Large Odd BuildingK- Perfect Square Site, No Building501,626 471,726 42,828 28,500 21,000 61,798 21,797 11,040 34,735 250,000
6,794 5,131 3,052 960 760 1,940 1,408 1,042 2,593 2,000
1.4% 1.1% 7.1% 3.4% 3.6% 3.1% 6.5% 9.4% 7.5% 0.8%
Title 24 - 2016: With IWA
W/sf 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020
W 10,033 9,435 857 570 420 1,236 436 221 695 5,000
W/lf 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15
W 1,019 770 458 144 114 291 211 156 389 300
IWA W 340 340 340 340 340 340 340 340 340 340
TOTAL W 11,392 10,544 1,654 1,054 874 1,867 987 717 1,424 5,640 Mean
LPD W/sf 0.023 0.022 0.039 0.037 0.042 0.030 0.045 0.065 0.041 0.023 0.037
88.1% 89.5% 51.8% 54.1% 48.1% 66.2% 44.2% 30.8% 48.8% 88.7% 61.0%
8.9% 7.3% 27.7% 13.7% 13.0% 15.6% 21.4% 21.8% 27.3% 5.3% 16.2%
3.0% 3.2% 20.6% 32.3% 38.9% 18.2% 34.4% 47.4% 23.9% 6.0% 22.8%
W/sf 0.030 0.030 0.030 0.030 0.030 0.030 0.030 0.030 0.030 0.030
W 15,049 14,152 1,285 855 630 1,854 654 331 1,042 7,500
W/lf 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25
W 1,699 1,283 763 240 190 485 352 261 648 500
IWA W 450 450 450 450 450 450 450 450 450 450
TOTAL W 17,197 15,885 2,498 1,545 1,270 2,789 1,456 1,042 2,140 8,450 Mean
LPD W/sf 0.034 0.034 0.058 0.054 0.060 0.045 0.067 0.094 0.062 0.034 0.054
87.5% 89.1% 51.4% 55.3% 49.6% 66.5% 44.9% 31.8% 48.7% 88.8% 61.4%
9.9% 8.1% 30.5% 15.5% 15.0% 17.4% 24.2% 25.0% 30.3% 5.9% 18.2%
2.6% 2.8% 18.0% 29.1% 35.4% 16.1% 30.9% 43.2% 21.0% 5.3% 20.5%
W/sf 0.035 0.035 0.035 0.035 0.035 0.035 0.035 0.035 0.035 0.035
W 17,557 16,510 1,499 998 735 2,163 763 386 1,216 8,750
W/lf 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70
W 4,756 3,592 2,136 672 532 1,358 986 729 1,815 1,400
IWA W 450 450 450 450 450 450 450 450 450 450
TOTAL W 22,763 20,552 4,085 2,120 1,717 3,971 2,198 1,566 3,481 10,600 Mean
LPD W/sf 0.045 0.044 0.095 0.074 0.082 0.064 0.101 0.142 0.100 0.042 0.079
77.1% 80.3% 36.7% 47.1% 42.8% 54.5% 34.7% 24.7% 34.9% 82.5% 51.5%
20.9% 17.5% 52.3% 31.7% 31.0% 34.2% 44.8% 46.6% 52.1% 13.2% 34.4%
2.0% 2.2% 11.0% 21.2% 26.2% 11.3% 20.5% 28.7% 12.9% 4.2% 14.0%
%W from IWA
%W from IWA
LZ2
Asphalt
AWA
LWA
%W from AWA
%W from LWA
LZ1
AWA
LWA
%W from AWA
%W from LWA
Perimeter to Area Ratio
Area, [sf]
Perimeter, [sf]
Site Description
LZ2
Concrete
AWA
LWA
%W from AWA
%W from LWA
%W from IWA
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 156
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 79
Table 47: 2016 LED Prototype Site Calculations
A- Long Skinny, Big BuildingB-Square, Odd BuildingC- Odd, Campus BuildingsD- Long Skinny, Small Square BuildingE- Square, Small BuildingF- Odd, Long Square BuildingG- Long Skinny, Odd BuildingH- Square, Large Square BuildingJ- Odd, Large Odd BuildingK- Perfect Square Site, No Building501,626 471,726 42,828 28,500 21,000 61,798 21,797 11,040 34,735 250,000
6,794 5,131 3,052 960 760 1,940 1,408 1,042 2,593 2,000
1.4% 1.1% 7.1% 3.4% 3.6% 3.1% 6.5% 9.4% 7.5% 0.8%
Title 24 - 2016: With IWA
W/sf 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040
W 20,065 18,869 1,713 1,140 840 2,472 872 442 1,389 10,000
W/lf 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35
W 2,378 1,796 1,068 336 266 679 493 365 908 700
IWA W 520 520 520 520 520 520 520 520 520 520
TOTAL W 22,963 21,185 3,301 1,996 1,626 3,671 1,885 1,326 2,817 11,220 Mean
LPD W/sf 0.046 0.045 0.077 0.070 0.077 0.059 0.086 0.120 0.081 0.045 0.071
87.4% 89.1% 51.9% 57.1% 51.7% 67.3% 46.3% 33.3% 49.3% 89.1% 62.2%
10.4% 8.5% 32.4% 16.8% 16.4% 18.5% 26.1% 27.5% 32.2% 6.2% 19.5%
2.3% 2.5% 15.8% 26.1% 32.0% 14.2% 27.6% 39.2% 18.5% 4.6% 18.3%
W/sf 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040
W 20,065 18,869 1,713 1,140 840 2,472 872 442 1,389 10,000
W/lf 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70
W 4,756 3,592 2,136 672 532 1,358 986 729 1,815 1,400
IWA W 520 520 520 520 520 520 520 520 520 520
TOTAL W 25,341 22,981 4,370 2,332 1,892 4,350 2,377 1,691 3,725 11,920 Mean
LPD W/sf 0.051 0.049 0.102 0.082 0.090 0.070 0.109 0.153 0.107 0.048 0.086
79.2% 82.1% 39.2% 48.9% 44.4% 56.8% 36.7% 26.1% 37.3% 83.9% 53.5%
18.8% 15.6% 48.9% 28.8% 28.1% 31.2% 41.5% 43.1% 48.7% 11.7% 31.7%
2.1% 2.3% 11.9% 22.3% 27.5% 12.0% 21.9% 30.8% 14.0% 4.4% 14.9%
W/sf 0.050 0.050 0.050 0.050 0.050 0.050 0.050 0.050 0.050 0.050
W 25,081 23,586 2,141 1,425 1,050 3,090 1,090 552 1,737 12,500
W/lf 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45
W 3,057 2,309 1,373 432 342 873 634 469 1,167 900
IWA W 640 640 640 640 640 640 640 640 640 640
TOTAL W 28,779 26,535 4,155 2,497 2,032 4,603 2,363 1,661 3,544 14,040 Mean
LPD W/sf 0.057 0.056 0.097 0.088 0.097 0.074 0.108 0.150 0.102 0.056 0.089
87.2% 88.9% 51.5% 57.1% 51.7% 67.1% 46.1% 33.2% 49.0% 89.0% 62.1%
10.6% 8.7% 33.1% 17.3% 16.8% 19.0% 26.8% 28.2% 32.9% 6.4% 20.0%
2.2% 2.4% 15.4% 25.6% 31.5% 13.9% 27.1% 38.5% 18.1% 4.6% 17.9%
%W from AWA
%W from LWA
%W from IWA
%W from LWA
%W from IWA
%W from LWA
%W from IWA
LZ4
AWA
LWA
LZ3
Asphalt
AWA
LWA
%W from AWA
LZ3
Concrete
AWA
LWA
%W from AWA
Perimeter to Area Ratio
Area, [sf]
Perimeter, [sf]
Site Description
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 157
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 80
Table 48: Proposed 2019 LED Prototype Site Calculations
A- Long Skinny, Big BuildingB-Square, Odd BuildingC- Odd, Campus BuildingsD- Long Skinny, Small Square BuildingE- Square, Small BuildingF- Odd, Long Square BuildingG- Long Skinny, Odd BuildingH- Square, Large Square BuildingJ- Odd, Large Odd BuildingK- Perfect Square Site, No Building501,626 471,726 42,828 28,500 21,000 61,798 21,797 11,040 34,735 250,000
6,794 5,131 3,052 960 760 1,940 1,408 1,042 2,593 2,000
1.4% 1.1% 7.1% 3.4% 3.6% 3.1% 6.5% 9.4% 7.5% 0.8%
Title 24 - 2019: With IWA
W/sf 0.018 0.018 0.018 0.018 0.018 0.018 0.018 0.018 0.018 0.018
W 9,029 8,491 771 513 378 1,112 392 199 625 4,500
W/lf 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15
W 1,019 770 458 144 114 291 211 156 389 300
IWA W 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180
TOTAL W 10,228 9,441 1,409 837 672 1,583 784 535 1,194 4,980 Mean
LPD W/sf 0.020 0.020 0.033 0.029 0.032 0.026 0.036 0.048 0.034 0.020 0.030
88.3% 89.9% 54.7% 61.3% 56.3% 70.3% 50.1% 37.1% 52.4% 90.4% 65.1%
10.0% 8.2% 32.5% 17.2% 17.0% 18.4% 27.0% 29.2% 32.6% 6.0% 19.8%
1.8% 1.9% 12.8% 21.5% 26.8% 11.4% 23.0% 33.6% 15.1% 3.6% 15.1%
W/sf 0.023 0.023 0.023 0.023 0.023 0.023 0.023 0.023 0.023 0.023
W 11,537 10,850 985 656 483 1,421 501 254 799 5,750
W/lf 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17
W 1,155 872 519 163 129 330 239 177 441 340
IWA W 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250
TOTAL W 12,942 11,972 1,754 1,069 862 2,001 991 681 1,490 6,340 Mean
LPD W/sf 0.026 0.025 0.041 0.037 0.041 0.032 0.045 0.062 0.043 0.025 0.038
%W from AWA 89.1% 90.6% 56.2% 61.3% 56.0% 71.0% 50.6% 37.3% 53.6% 90.7% 65.7%
%W from LWA 8.9% 7.3% 29.6% 15.3% 15.0% 16.5% 24.2% 26.0% 29.6% 5.4% 17.8%
1.9% 2.1% 14.3% 23.4% 29.0% 12.5% 25.2% 36.7% 16.8% 3.9% 16.6%
W/sf 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025
W 12,541 11,793 1,071 713 525 1,545 545 276 868 6,250
W/lf 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40
W 2,718 2,052 1,221 384 304 776 563 417 1,037 800
IWA W 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250
TOTAL W 15,508 14,096 2,542 1,347 1,079 2,571 1,358 943 2,156 7,300 Mean
LPD W/sf 0.031 0.030 0.059 0.047 0.051 0.042 0.062 0.085 0.062 0.029 0.050
%W from AWA 80.9% 83.7% 42.1% 52.9% 48.7% 60.1% 40.1% 29.3% 40.3% 85.6% 56.4%
%W from LWA 17.5% 14.6% 48.0% 28.5% 28.2% 30.2% 41.5% 44.2% 48.1% 11.0% 31.2%
1.6% 1.8% 9.8% 18.6% 23.2% 9.7% 18.4% 26.5% 11.6% 3.4% 12.5%
%W from IWA
%W from IWA
LZ2
Asphalt
AWA
LWA
LZ1
AWA
LWA
%W from AWA
%W from LWA
Perimeter to Area Ratio
Area, [sf]
Perimeter, [sf]
Site Description
LZ2
Concrete
AWA
LWA
%W from IWA
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 158
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 81
Table 49: Proposed 2019 LED Prototype Site Calculations
A- Long Skinny, Big BuildingB-Square, Odd BuildingC- Odd, Campus BuildingsD- Long Skinny, Small Square BuildingE- Square, Small BuildingF- Odd, Long Square BuildingG- Long Skinny, Odd BuildingH- Square, Large Square BuildingJ- Odd, Large Odd BuildingK- Perfect Square Site, No Building501,626 471,726 42,828 28,500 21,000 61,798 21,797 11,040 34,735 250,000
6,794 5,131 3,052 960 760 1,940 1,408 1,042 2,593 2,000
1.4% 1.1% 7.1% 3.4% 3.6% 3.1% 6.5% 9.4% 7.5% 0.8%
Title 24 - 2019: With IWA
W/sf 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025
W 12,541 11,793 1,071 713 525 1,545 545 276 868 6,250
W/lf 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25
W 1,699 1,283 763 240 190 485 352 261 648 500
IWA W 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 350
TOTAL W 14,589 13,426 2,184 1,303 1,065 2,380 1,247 887 1,867 7,100 Mean
LPD W/sf 0.029 0.028 0.051 0.046 0.051 0.039 0.057 0.080 0.054 0.028 0.046
86.0% 87.8% 49.0% 54.7% 49.3% 64.9% 43.7% 31.1% 46.5% 88.0% 60.1%
11.6% 9.6% 34.9% 18.4% 17.8% 20.4% 28.2% 29.4% 34.7% 7.0% 21.2%
2.4% 2.6% 16.0% 26.9% 32.9% 14.7% 28.1% 39.5% 18.8% 4.9% 18.7%
W/sf 0.030 0.030 0.030 0.030 0.030 0.030 0.030 0.030 0.030 0.030
W 15,049 14,152 1,285 855 630 1,854 654 331 1,042 7,500
W/lf 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40
W 2,718 2,052 1,221 384 304 776 563 417 1,037 800
IWA W 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 350
TOTAL W 18,116 16,554 2,856 1,589 1,284 2,980 1,567 1,098 2,429 8,650 Mean
LPD W/sf 0.036 0.035 0.067 0.056 0.061 0.048 0.072 0.099 0.070 0.035 0.058
83.1% 85.5% 45.0% 53.8% 49.1% 62.2% 41.7% 30.2% 42.9% 86.7% 58.0%
15.0% 12.4% 42.8% 24.2% 23.7% 26.0% 35.9% 38.0% 42.7% 9.2% 27.0%
1.9% 2.1% 12.3% 22.0% 27.3% 11.7% 22.3% 31.9% 14.4% 4.0% 15.0%
W/sf 0.030 0.030 0.030 0.030 0.030 0.030 0.030 0.030 0.030 0.030
W 15,049 14,152 1,285 855 630 1,854 654 331 1,042 7,500
W/lf 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35
W 2,378 1,796 1,068 336 266 679 493 365 908 700
IWA W 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400
TOTAL W 17,827 16,348 2,753 1,591 1,296 2,933 1,547 1,096 2,350 8,600 Mean
LPD W/sf 0.036 0.035 0.064 0.056 0.062 0.047 0.071 0.099 0.068 0.034 0.057
84.4% 86.6% 46.7% 53.7% 48.6% 63.2% 42.3% 30.2% 44.4% 87.2% 58.7%
13.3% 11.0% 38.8% 21.1% 20.5% 23.2% 31.9% 33.3% 38.6% 8.1% 24.0%
2.2% 2.4% 14.5% 25.1% 30.9% 13.6% 25.9% 36.5% 17.0% 4.7% 17.3%
%W from AWA
%W from LWA
%W from IWA
%W from LWA
%W from IWA
%W from LWA
%W from IWA
LZ4
AWA
LWA
LZ3
Asphalt
AWA
LWA
%W from AWA
LZ3
Concrete
AWA
LWA
%W from AWA
Perimeter to Area Ratio
Area, [sf]
Perimeter, [sf]
Site Description
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 159
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 82
The cost-effectiveness of using LED luminaires as a baseline for all the specific applications was based on a one-for-one comparison of lighting
equipment. Most of these applications are unlikely to reduce the equipment quantity substantially from using LED products, allowing for a one-
on-one comparison. The 3000K LED luminaires studied were based on equivalent lumen output and luminaire type as the legacy product
baseline. A breakdown of the recommended LPAs along with legacy product and equivalent 3000K LEDs are provided in Table 50 to Table 100.
Table 50: Building Entrances and Exits Calculation Results and LPA Recommendations in Red
LZ1 LZ2 L Z3 LZ4
Allowance 15 25 35 45 Watts
LPW 32 32 32 32 lm/W
LPW 63 66 70 77 lm/W
Limit of Reduction 7.6 12.1 15.9 19.0 Limit of Reduction
Proposed LPA 9 15 19 21 Watts
2016
2019
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 160
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 83
Table 51: Building Entrances and Exits Legacy Product Calculation
Area Light
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Lamp
Wattage
Lamp
Type
Luminaire 2020
Estimated
Luminaire
Cost
System
Watts
Luminaire
Lumen
Depreciation
(LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.20 0.10 0.05 0.00 18 CFL E104 3,719$ 20 0.856 746 37 7.5 3.7 1.9 0.0 4 2 1 0 744$ 372$ 186$ -$
0.25 0.15 0.05 0.05 26 CFL E105 3,719$ 28 0.858 1,077 38 9.6 5.8 1.9 1.9 7 4 1 1 930$ 558$ 186$ 186$
0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 32 CFL E106 3,719$ 35 0.860 1,440 41 10.3 8.2 6.2 4.1 9 7 5 4 930$ 744$ 558$ 372$
0.15 0.25 0.25 0.10 42 CFL E107 3,719$ 46 0.860 1,920 42 6.3 10.4 10.4 4.2 7 12 12 5 558$ 930$ 930$ 372$
0.10 0.15 0.15 0.05 50 PSMH E045 686$ 67 0.670 2,257 34 3.4 5.1 5.1 1.7 7 10 10 3 69$ 103$ 103$ 34$
0.05 0.10 0.20 0.10 70 PSMH E046 686$ 92 0.740 3,675 40 2.0 4.0 8.0 4.0 5 9 18 9 34$ 69$ 137$ 69$
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.30 100 PSMH E047 696$ 129 0.750 5,431 42 0.0 2.1 4.2 12.6 0 6 13 39 -$ 35$ 70$ 209$
0.00 0.00 0.05 0.30 150 PSMH E048 774$ 190 0.740 8,037 42 0.0 0.0 2.1 12.7 0 0 10 57 -$ -$ 39$ 232$
1 1 1 1 39 39 40 41 38 50 70 118 3,264$ 2,810$ 2,208$ 1,474$
Wall Mounted Luminaire
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Lamp
Wattage
Lamp
Type
Luminaire 2020
Estimated
Luminaire
Cost
System
Watts
Luminaire
Lumen
Depreciation
(LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.20 0.10 0.05 0.00 26 CFL e020 467$ 28 0.858 709 25 5.1 2.5 1.3 0.0 6 3 1 0 93$ 47$ 23$ -$
0.25 0.15 0.05 0.05 26 CFL E020 467$ 28 0.858 709 25 6.3 3.8 1.3 1.3 7 4 1 1 117$ 70$ 23$ 23$
0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 32 CFL E021 470$ 35 0.860 947 27 6.8 5.4 4.1 2.7 9 7 5 4 117$ 94$ 70$ 47$
0.15 0.25 0.25 0.10 42 CFL E022 470$ 46 0.860 1,262 27 4.1 6.9 6.9 2.7 7 12 12 5 70$ 117$ 117$ 47$
0.10 0.15 0.15 0.05 50 PSMH E023 600$ 67 0.670 1,225 18 1.8 2.7 2.7 0.9 7 10 10 3 60$ 90$ 90$ 30$
0.05 0.10 0.20 0.10 70 PSMH E024 600$ 92 0.740 1,996 22 1.1 2.2 4.3 2.2 5 9 18 9 30$ 60$ 120$ 60$
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.30 100 PSMH E025 606$ 129 0.750 2,949 23 0.0 1.1 2.3 6.9 0 6 13 39 -$ 30$ 61$ 182$
0.00 0.00 0.05 0.30 150 PSMH E026 548$ 190 0.740 4,364 23 0.0 0.0 1.1 6.9 0 0 10 57 -$ -$ 27$ 164$
1 1 1 1 25 25 24 24 40 51 70 118 488$ 508$ 533$ 554$
Average: 32 32 32 32 39 51 70 118 1,876$ 1,659$ 1,370$ 1,014$
2008 Basis of Design
2008 Basis of Design
Weighting Weighted Watt Weighted Cost
Weighting Weighted Watt Weighted Cost
Weighted LPW
Weighted LPW
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 161
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 84
Table 52: Building Entrances and Exits Equivalent LED Calculation
Area Light
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Luminaire 2020
Estimated
Luminaire
Cost
2017
System
Watts
LED L70
lifetime
hours
(LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.20 0.10 0.05 0.00 L104 1,197$ 14 0.700 1130 81 3 1 1 0 239$ 120$ 60$ -$ 16 8 4 0
0.25 0.15 0.05 0.05 L105 1,197$ 14 0.700 1130 81 4 2 1 1 299$ 179$ 60$ 60$ 20 12 4 4
0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 L106 1,197$ 14 0.700 1130 81 4 3 2 1 299$ 239$ 179$ 120$ 20 16 12 8
0.15 0.25 0.25 0.10 L107 1,124$ 21 0.700 1695 81 3 5 5 2 169$ 281$ 281$ 112$ 12 20 20 8
0.10 0.15 0.15 0.05 L045 1,242$ 50 0.887 4703 94 5 8 8 3 124$ 186$ 186$ 62$ 9 14 14 5
0.05 0.10 0.20 0.10 L046 1,242$ 50 0.887 4703 94 3 5 10 5 62$ 124$ 248$ 124$ 5 9 19 9
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.30 L047 1,275$ 80 0.887 6781 85 0 4 8 24 -$ 64$ 128$ 383$ 0 4 8 25
0.00 0.00 0.05 0.30 L048 1,309$ 105 0.887 8601 82 0 0 5 32 -$ -$ 65$ 393$ 0 0 4 25
1 1 1 1 20 28 40 67 1,193$ 1,194$ 1,208$ 1,254$ 83 84 86 84
Wall Mounted Luminaire
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Luminaire 2020
Estimated
Luminaire
Cost
2017
System
Watts
LED L70
lifetime
hours
(LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.20 0.10 0.05 0.00 L020 136$ 16 0.781 625 39 3 2 1 0 27$ 14$ 7$ -$ 8 4 2 0
0.25 0.15 0.05 0.05 L020 136$ 16 0.781 625 39 4 2 1 1 34$ 20$ 7$ 7$ 10 6 2 2
0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 L021 136$ 16 0.781 625 39 4 3 2 2 34$ 27$ 20$ 14$ 10 8 6 4
0.15 0.25 0.25 0.10 L022 225$ 27 0.700 1222 45 4 7 7 3 34$ 56$ 56$ 23$ 7 11 11 5
0.10 0.15 0.15 0.05 L023 406$ 18 0.700 1202 67 2 3 3 1 41$ 61$ 61$ 20$ 7 10 10 3
0.05 0.10 0.20 0.10 L024 533$ 28 0.700 1693 60 1 3 6 3 27$ 53$ 107$ 53$ 3 6 12 6
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.30 L025 608$ 55 0.700 2904 53 0 3 6 17 -$ 30$ 61$ 182$ 0 3 5 16
0.00 0.00 0.05 0.30 L026 608$ 37 0.700 4164 113 0 0 2 11 -$ -$ 30$ 182$ 0 0 6 34
1 1 1 1 18 22 26 36 196$ 262$ 349$ 481$ 44 48 54 69
Average: 19 25 33 52 694$ 728$ 779$ 867$ 63 66 70 77
2017 LED Equivalency
2017 LED Equivalency
Weighted Cost Weighted LPW
Weighting Weighted 2017 Watt Weighted Cost Weighted LPW
Weighting Weighted 2017 Watt
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 162
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 85
Table 53: Primary Entrances Calculation Results and LPA Recommendations in Red
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
Allowance 45 80 120 130 Watts
LPW 27 26 25 25 lm/W
LPW 62 66 69 79 lm/W
Limit of Reduction 19.7 31.8 44.4 40.5 Limit of Reduction
Proposed LPA 20 40 57 60 Watts
2016
2019
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 163
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 86
Table 54: Primary Entrances Legacy Product Calculation
Downlight
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Lamp
Wattage
Lamp
Type
Luminaire 2020
Estimated
Luminaire
Cost
System
Watts
Luminaire
Lumen
Depreciation
(LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per
Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.50 0.35 0.10 0.05 32 CFL E140 315$ 35 0.860 685 20 9.8 6.8 2.0 1.0 18 12 4 2 157$ 110$ 31$ 16$
0.30 0.30 0.20 0.15 42 CFL E141 $ 281 46 0.860 913 20 6.0 6.0 4.0 3.0 14 14 9 7 84$ 84$ 56$ 42$
0.15 0.20 0.25 0.25 70 PSMH E097 292$ 92 0.740 1,895 21 3.1 4.1 5.2 5.2 14 18 23 23 44$ 58$ 73$ 73$
0.05 0.10 0.30 0.30 100 PSMH E098 299$ 129 0.750 2,801 22 1.1 2.2 6.5 6.5 6 13 39 39 15$ 30$ 90$ 90$
1 1 1 1 20 19 18 16 52 57 74 70 300$ 283$ 251$ 221$
Wall Pack
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Lamp
Wattage
Lamp
Type
Luminaire 2020
Estimated
Luminaire
Cost
System
Watts
Luminaire
Lumen
Depreciation
(LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per
Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.40 0.20 0.10 0.00 26 CFL E020 467$ 28 0.858 709 25 10.1 5.1 2.5 0.0 11 6 3 0 187$ 93$ 47$ -$
0.25 0.25 0.15 0.05 32 CFL E021 470$ 35 0.860 947 27 6.8 6.8 4.1 1.4 9 9 5 2 117$ 117$ 70$ 23$
0.20 0.20 0.15 0.10 42 CFL E022 470$ 46 0.860 1,262 27 5.5 5.5 4.1 2.7 9 9 7 5 94$ 94$ 70$ 47$
0.10 0.15 0.20 0.10 70 PSMH E024 600$ 92 0.740 1,996 22 2.2 3.3 4.3 2.2 9 14 18 9 60$ 90$ 120$ 60$
0.05 0.10 0.20 0.15 100 PSMH E025 606$ 129 0.750 2,949 23 1.1 2.3 4.6 3.4 6 13 26 19 30$ 61$ 121$ 91$
0.00 0.05 0.05 0.25 150 PSMH E026 548$ 190 0.740 4,364 23 0.0 1.1 1.1 5.7 0 10 10 48 -$ 27$ 27$ 137$
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.25 175 PSMH E042 328$ 198 0.700 4,721 24 0.0 1.2 2.4 6.0 0 10 20 50 -$ 16$ 33$ 82$
0.00 0.00 0.05 0.10 250 PSMH E043 535$ 291 0.700 6,787 23 0.0 0.0 1.2 2.3 0 0 15 29 -$ -$ 27$ 54$
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 26 25 24 24 45 70 103 161 488$ 499$ 516$ 494$
Area
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Lamp
Wattage
Lamp
Type
Luminaire 2020
Estimated
Luminaire
Cost
System
Watts
Luminaire
Lumen
Depreciation
(LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per
Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.05 0.05 0.00 0.00 18 CFL E104 3,719$ 20 0.856 746 37 1.9 1.9 0.0 0.0 1 1 0 0 186$ 186$ -$ -$
0.10 0.05 0.00 0.00 26 CFL E105 3,719$ 28 0.858 1,077 38 3.8 1.9 0.0 0.0 3 1 0 0 372$ 186$ -$ -$
0.20 0.10 0.10 0.00 32 CFL E106 3,719$ 35 0.860 1,440 41 8.2 4.1 4.1 0.0 7 4 4 0 744$ 372$ 372$ -$
0.20 0.15 0.10 0.10 42 CFL E107 3,719$ 46 0.860 1,920 42 8.3 6.3 4.2 4.2 9 7 5 5 744$ 558$ 372$ 372$
0.20 0.20 0.15 0.10 50 PSMH E136 686$ 67 0.670 1,558 23 4.7 4.7 3.5 2.3 13 13 10 7 137$ 137$ 103$ 69$
0.15 0.25 0.25 0.20 70 PSMH E137 686$ 92 0.740 3,098 34 5.1 8.4 8.4 6.7 14 23 23 18 103$ 172$ 172$ 137$
0.10 0.15 0.25 0.30 100 PSMH E138 696$ 129 0.750 4,736 37 3.7 5.5 9.2 11.0 13 19 32 39 70$ 104$ 174$ 209$
0.00 0.05 0.15 0.30 150 PSMH E139 774$ 190 0.705 6,372 34 0.0 1.7 5.0 10.1 0 10 29 57 -$ 39$ 116$ 232$
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 36 34 34 34 60 78 102 125 2,355$ 1,754$ 1,308$ 1,019$
Average: 27 26 25 25 52 68 93 119 1,048$ 845$ 692$ 578$
Weighting Weighted Watt Weighted CostWeighted LPW2008 Basis of Design
Weighting Weighted Watt Weighted CostWeighted LPW2008 Basis of Design
Weighting Weighted Watt Weighted CostWeighted LPW2008 Basis of Design
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 164
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 87
Table 55: Primary Entrances LED Calculation
Downlight
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Luminaire 2020
Estimated
Luminaire
Cost
2017
System
Watts
LED L70
lifetime
hours (LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.50 0.35 0.10 0.05 L140 141$ 12.8 0.700 732 57 6 4 1 1 70$ 49$ 14$ 7$ 29 20 6 3
0.30 0.30 0.20 0.15 L141 154$ 20.5 0.700 1086 53 6 6 4 3 46$ 46$ 31$ 23$ 16 16 11 8
0.15 0.20 0.25 0.25 L097 243$ 31.6 0.700 1603 51 5 6 8 8 36$ 49$ 61$ 61$ 8 10 13 13
0.05 0.10 0.30 0.30 L098 1,128$ 67 0.940 3677 55 3 7 20 20 56$ 113$ 338$ 338$ 3 5 16 16
1 1 1 1 21 24 33 32 209$ 257$ 444$ 429$ 55 52 45 40
Wall Pack
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Luminaire 2020
Estimated
Luminaire
Cost
2017
System
Watts
LED L70
lifetime
hours (LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.40 0.20 0.10 0.00 L020 136$ 16 0.781 625 39 6 3 2 0 54$ 27$ 14$ -$ 16 8 4 0
0.25 0.25 0.15 0.05 L021 136$ 16 0.781 625 39 4 4 2 1 34$ 34$ 20$ 7$ 10 10 6 2
0.20 0.20 0.15 0.10 L022 225$ 27 0.700 1222 45 5 5 4 3 45$ 45$ 34$ 23$ 9 9 7 5
0.10 0.15 0.20 0.10 L024 533$ 28 0.880 2129 76 3 4 6 3 53$ 80$ 107$ 53$ 8 11 15 8
0.05 0.10 0.20 0.15 L025 608$ 55 0.880 3651 66 3 6 11 8 30$ 61$ 122$ 91$ 3 7 13 10
0.00 0.05 0.05 0.25 L026 608$ 37 0.880 5235 141 0 2 2 9 -$ 30$ 30$ 152$ 0 7 7 35
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.25 L042 608$ 37 0.940 5592 151 0 2 4 9 -$ 30$ 61$ 152$ 0 8 15 38
0.00 0.00 0.05 0.10 L043 608$ 55 0.880 7081 129 0 0 3 6 -$ -$ 30$ 61$ 0 0 6 13
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 21 26 33 39 217$ 308$ 417$ 538$ 45 59 74 110
Area
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Luminaire 2020
Estimated
Luminaire
Cost
2017
System
Watts
LED L70
lifetime
hours (LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.05 0.05 0.00 0.00 L104 1,197$ 14 0.700 1130 81 1 1 0 0 60$ 60$ -$ -$ 4 4 0 0
0.10 0.05 0.00 0.00 L105 1,197$ 14 0.700 1130 81 1 1 0 0 120$ 60$ -$ -$ 8 4 0 0
0.20 0.10 0.10 0.00 L106 1,197$ 14 0.700 1130 81 3 1 1 0 239$ 120$ 120$ -$ 16 8 8 0
0.20 0.15 0.10 0.10 L107 1,124$ 21 0.700 1695 81 4 3 2 2 225$ 169$ 112$ 112$ 16 12 8 8
0.20 0.20 0.15 0.10 L136 1,242$ 50 0.887 4703 94 10 10 8 5 248$ 248$ 186$ 124$ 19 19 14 9
0.15 0.25 0.25 0.20 L137 1,242$ 50 0.887 4703 94 8 13 13 10 186$ 311$ 311$ 248$ 14 24 24 19
0.10 0.15 0.25 0.30 L138 1,275$ 80 0.887 6781 85 8 12 20 24 128$ 191$ 319$ 383$ 8 13 21 25
0.00 0.05 0.15 0.30 L139 1,309$ 105 0.887 8601 82 0 5 16 32 -$ 65$ 196$ 393$ 0 4 12 25
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 35 46 59 73 1,206$ 1,224$ 1,244$ 1,260$ 86 87 87 86
Average: 26 32 42 48 544$ 596$ 702$ 743$ 62 66 69 79
Weighted Cost Weighted LPW
Weighted Cost Weighted LPWWeightingWeighted 2017 Watt2016 LED Equivalency
Weighting Weighted 2017 Watt2016 LED Equivalency
Weighted LPWWeightingWeighted CostWeighted 2017 Watt2016 LED Equivalency
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 165
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 88
Table 56: Drive-Up Windows Calculation Results and LPA Recommendations in Red
Table 57: Drive-Up Windows Legacy Product Calculation
LZ1 LZ2 L Z3 LZ4
Allowance 40 75 125 200 Watts
LPW 26 26 26 26 lm/W
LPW 77 77 77 77 lm/W
Limit of Reduction 13.3 25.2 42.3 67.4 Limit of Reduction
Proposed LPA 16 30 50 75 Watts
2016
2019
Round Ceiling Mounted Downlight
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Lamp
Wattage
Lamp
Type
Luminaire 2020
Estimated
Luminaire
Cost
System
Watts
Luminaire
Lumen
Depreciation
(LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per
Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 L Z2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.10 0.05 0.00 0.00 50 PSMH E054 346$ 67 0.670 1,337 20 2 1 0 0 7 3 0 0 35$ 17$ -$ -$
0.20 0.15 0.05 0.10 70 PSMH E055 369$ 92 0.740 2,177 24 5 4 1 2 18 14 5 9 74$ 55$ 18$ 37$
0.30 0.25 0.20 0.30 100 PSMH E056 369$ 129 0.750 3,216 25 7 6 5 7 39 32 26 39 111$ 92$ 74$ 111$
0.40 0.55 0.75 0.60 150 PSMH E057 499$ 190 0.740 4,759 25 10 14 19 15 76 105 143 114 199$ 274$ 374$ 299$
1 1 1 1 24 25 25 25 140 154 173 162 419$ 439$ 466$ 447$
Ceiling Mounted, Full Cut-Off
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Lamp
Wattage
Lamp
Type
Luminaire 2020
Estimated
Luminaire
Cost
System
Watts
Luminaire
Lumen
Depreciation
(LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per
Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 L Z2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 70 PSMH E035 752$ 92 0.740 2,432 26 11 11 11 11 37 37 37 37 301$ 301$ 301$ 301$
0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 100 PSMH E036 752$ 129 0.750 3,593 28 17 17 17 17 77 77 77 77 451$ 451$ 451$ 451$
1 1 1 1 27 27 27 27 114 114 114 114 752$ 752$ 752$ 752$
Average: 26 26 26 26 127 134 144 138 585$ 595$ 609$ 599$
Weighted LPWWeighting Weighted Watt Weighted Cost2008 Basis of Design
Weighting Weighted Watt Weighted CostWeighted LPW2008 Basis of Design
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 166
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 89
Table 58: Drive-Up Windows Equivalent LED Calculation
Table 59: Uncovered Fuel Dispenser Calculation Results and LPA Recommendations in Red
Round Ceiling Mounted Downlight
LZ1 LZ2 L Z3 LZ4 Luminaire 2020
Estimated
Luminaire
Cost
2017
System
Watts
LED L70
lifetime
hours
(LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 L Z3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.10 0.05 0.00 0.00 L054 236$ 24.1 0.700 1540 64 2 1 0 0 24$ 12$ -$ -$ 6 3 0 0
0.20 0.15 0.05 0.10 L055 257$ 34.6 0.700 2130 62 7 5 2 3 51$ 39$ 13$ 26$ 12 9 3 6
0.30 0.25 0.20 0.30 L056 281$ 42.3 0.700 2909 69 13 11 8 13 84$ 70$ 56$ 84$ 21 17 14 21
0.40 0.55 0.75 0.60 L057 365$ 72.2 0.700 4635 64 29 40 54 43 146$ 201$ 274$ 219$ 26 35 48 39
1 1 1 1 51 57 64 59 305$ 321$ 343$ 329$ 65 65 65 65
Ceiling Mounted, Full Cut-Off
LZ1 LZ2 L Z3 LZ4 Luminaire 2020
Estimated
Luminaire
Cost
2017
System
Watts
LED L70
lifetime
hours
(LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 L Z3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 L035 985$ 24 0.700 2260 94 10 10 10 10 394$ 394$ 394$ 394$ 38 38 38 38
0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 L036 985$ 36 0.700 3105 86 22 22 22 22 591$ 591$ 591$ 591$ 52 52 52 52
1 1 1 1 31 31 31 31 985$ 985$ 985$ 985$ 89 89 89 89
Average: 41 44 48 45 645$ 653$ 664$ 657$ 77 77 77 77
Weighted Cost Weighted LPWWeightingWeighted 2017 Watt2017 LED Equivalency
Weighted LPWWeightingWeighted CostWeighted 2017 Watt2017 LED Equivalency
LZ1 LZ2 L Z3 LZ4
Allowance 120 175 185 330 Watts
LPW 31 32 33 34 lm/W
LPW 76 83 88 91 lm/W
Limit of Reduction 48.6 67.1 68.9 122.4 Limit of Reduction
Proposed LPA 55 77 81 135 Watts
2016
2019
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 167
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 90
Table 60: Uncovered Fuel Dispenser Legacy Product Calculation
Table 61: Uncovered Fuel Dispenser Equivalent LED Calculation
Table 62: ATM Machine Lighting Calculation Results and LPA Recommendations in Red
Area
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Lamp
Wattage
Lamp
Type
Luminaire 2020
Estimated
Luminaire
Cost
System
Watts
Luminaire
Lumen
Depreciation
(LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.20 0.10 0.05 0.00 100 PSMH E070 1,010$ 129 0.750 3,876 30 6 3 2 0 26 13 6 0 202$ 101$ 51$ -$
0.30 0.20 0.10 0.05 150 PSMH E071 1,010$ 190 0.740 5,737 30 9 6 3 2 57 38 19 10 303$ 202$ 101$ 51$
0.30 0.30 0.30 0.25 175 PSMH E037 1,062$ 198 0.700 5,895 30 9 9 9 7 59 59 59 50 319$ 319$ 319$ 266$
0.20 0.30 0.35 0.40 250 PSMH E073 1,205$ 291 0.700 9,801 34 7 10 12 13 58 87 102 116 241$ 361$ 422$ 482$
0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 400 PSMH E075 1,205$ 452 0.700 17,046 38 0 4 8 11 0 45 90 136 -$ 120$ 241$ 361$
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 31 32 33 34 200 243 277 311 1,065$ 1,104$ 1,133$ 1,159$
Average: 31 32 33 34 200 243 277 311 1,065$ 1,104$ 1,133$ 1,159$
Weighting Weighted Watt Weighted CostWeighted LPW2008 Basis of Design
Area
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Luminaire 2020
Estimated
Luminaire
Cost
2017
System
Watts
LED L70
lifetime
hours
(LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.20 0.10 0.05 0.00 L070 1,127.69$ 67 0.940 3677 55 13 7 3 0 226$ 113$ 56$ -$ 11 5 3 0
0.30 0.20 0.10 0.05 L071 1,796.44$ 126 0.940 6958 55 38 25 13 6 539$ 359$ 180$ 90$ 17 11 6 3
0.30 0.30 0.30 0.25 L037 1,364.82$ 85 0.938 7865 93 26 26 26 21 409$ 409$ 409$ 341$ 28 28 28 23
0.20 0.30 0.35 0.40 L073 1,775.68$ 126 0.940 12953 103 25 38 44 50 355$ 533$ 621$ 710$ 21 31 36 41
0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 L075 1,551.67$ 210 0.700 16763 80 0 21 42 63 -$ 155$ 310$ 466$ 0 8 16 24
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 102 116 128 141 1,529$ 1,569$ 1,577$ 1,607$ 76 83 88 91
Average: 102 116 128 141 1,529$ 1,569$ 1,577$ 1,607$ 76 83 88 91
Weighted LPWWeightingWeighted CostWeighted 2017 Watt2016 LED Equivalency
LZ1 LZ2 L Z3 LZ4
Allowance 250 250 250 250 Watts
LPW 25 25 24 24 lm/W
LPW 68 71 82 100 lm/W
Limit of Reduction 89.6 86.6 74.7 59.9 Limit of Reduction
Proposed LPA 100 100 100 100 Watts
2016
2019
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 168
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 91
Table 63: ATM Machine Lighting Legacy Product Calculation
Table 64: ATM Machine Lighting Equivalent LED Calculation
Wall Mounted
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Lamp
Wattage
Lamp
Type
Luminaire 2020
Estimated
Luminaire
Cost
System
Watts
Luminaire
Lumen
Depreciation
(LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.20 0.20 0.15 0.05 26 CFL E020 467$ 28 0.858 709 25 5 5 4 1 6 6 4 1 85$ 85$ 64$ 21$
0.25 0.25 0.25 0.15 32 CFL E021 470$ 35 0.860 947 27 7 7 7 4 9 9 9 5 108$ 108$ 108$ 65$
0.25 0.20 0.10 0.10 100 PSMH E025 606$ 129 0.750 2949 23 6 5 2 2 32 26 13 13 139$ 111$ 56$ 56$
0.20 0.20 0.25 0.30 150 PSMH E026 548$ 190 0.740 4364 23 5 5 6 7 38 38 48 57 92$ 92$ 115$ 138$
0.10 0.10 0.15 0.25 175 PSMH E042 328$ 198 0.700 4721 24 2 2 4 6 20 20 30 50 30$ 30$ 45$ 75$
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 250 PSMH E043 535$ 291 0.700 6787 23 0 1 2 3 0 15 29 44 -$ 25$ 49$ 74$
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 25 25 24 24 104 113 132 170 453$ 450$ 436$ 428$
Average: 25 25 24 24 104 113 132 170 453$ 450$ 436$ 428$
Weighting Weighted Watt Weighted CostWeighted LPW2008 Basis of Design
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 169
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 92
Table 65: Outdoor Sales Frontage Calculation Results and LPA Recommendations in Red
Table 66: Outdoor Sales Frontage Legacy Product Calculation
LZ1 LZ2 L Z3 LZ4
Allowance 0 22.5 36 45 W/lf
LPW 37 37 39 40 lm/W
LPW 84 82 79 77 lm/W
Limit of Reduction 0.0 10.3 17.8 23.6 Limit of Reduction
Proposed LPA 0 11 19 25 W/lf
2016
2019
Area
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Lamp
Wattage
Lamp
Type
Luminaire 2020
Estimated
Luminaire
Cost
System
Watts
Luminaire
Lumen
Depreciation
(LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.10 0.05 0.00 0.00 100 PSMH E070 1,010$ 129 0.750 3,876 30 3 2 0 0 13 6 0 0 101$ 51$ -$ -$
0.20 0.10 0.00 0.00 150 PSMH E071 1,010$ 190 0.740 5,737 30 6 3 0 0 38 19 0 0 202$ 101$ -$ -$
0.25 0.20 0.10 0.00 175 PSMH E037 1,062$ 198 0.700 5,895 30 7 6 3 0 50 40 20 0 266$ 212$ 106$ -$
0.20 0.25 0.20 0.10 250 PSMH E073 1,205$ 291 0.700 9,801 34 7 8 7 3 58 73 58 29 241$ 301$ 241$ 120$
0.15 0.20 0.20 0.15 320 PSMH E074 1,205$ 368 0.700 12,571 34 5 7 7 5 55 74 74 55 181$ 241$ 241$ 181$
0.10 0.15 0.25 0.20 400 PSMH E075 1,205$ 452 0.700 17,046 38 4 6 9 8 45 68 113 90 120$ 181$ 301$ 241$
0.00 0.05 0.15 0.25 750 PSMH E076 1,762$ 818 0.700 32,399 40 0 2 6 10 0 41 123 205 -$ 88$ 264$ 441$
0.00 0.00 0.10 0.30 1000 PSMH E077 1,762$ 1080 0.701 49,590 46 0 0 5 14 0 0 108 324 -$ -$ 176$ 529$
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 32 33 37 40 259 320 495 703 1,111$ 1,175$ 1,330$ 1,511$
Flood
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Lamp
Wattage
Lamp
Type
Luminaire 2020
Estimated
Luminaire
Cost
System
Watts
Luminaire
Lumen
Depreciation
(LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.10 0.05 0.00 0.00 100 PSMH E126 1,261$ 129 0.750 5,315 41 4 2 0 0 13 6 0 0 126$ 63$ -$ -$
0.20 0.10 0.00 0.00 150 PSMH E127 1,276$ 190 0.740 7,728 41 8 4 0 0 38 19 0 0 255$ 128$ -$ -$
0.25 0.20 0.10 0.00 175 PSMH E078 1,045$ 198 0.700 8,053 41 10 8 4 0 50 40 20 0 261$ 209$ 104$ -$
0.20 0.25 0.20 0.10 250 PSMH E128 1,482$ 291 0.700 12,275 42 8 11 8 4 58 73 58 29 296$ 370$ 296$ 148$
0.15 0.20 0.20 0.15 320 PSMH E079 1,053$ 368 0.700 14,847 40 6 8 8 6 55 74 74 55 158$ 211$ 211$ 158$
0.10 0.20 0.30 0.30 400 PSMH E129 1,482$ 452 0.700 19,640 43 4 9 13 13 45 90 136 136 148$ 296$ 445$ 445$
0.00 0.00 0.20 0.45 1000 PSMH E130 1,976$ 1080 0.701 42,582 39 0 0 8 18 0 0 216 486 -$ -$ 395$ 889$
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 41 42 41 41 259 302 503 706 1,245$ 1,277$ 1,451$ 1,640$
Average: 37 37 39 40 259 311 499 705 1,178$ 1,226$ 1,391$ 1,576$
Weighting Weighted Watt Weighted CostWeighted LPW2008 Basis of Design
Weighting Weighted Watt Weighted CostWeighted LPW2008 Basis of Design
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 170
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 93
Table 67: Outdoor Sales Frontage Equivalent LED Calculation
Area
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Luminaire 2020
Estimated
Luminaire
Cost
2017
System
Watts
LED L70
lifetime
hours
(LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.10 0.05 0.00 0.00 L070 1,128$ 67 0.940 3677 55 7 3 0 0 113$ 56$ -$ -$ 5 3 0 0
0.20 0.10 0.00 0.00 L071 1,796$ 126 0.940 6958 55 25 13 0 0 359$ 180$ -$ -$ 11 6 0 0
0.25 0.20 0.10 0.00 L037 1,365$ 85 0.938 7865 93 21 17 9 0 341$ 273$ 136$ -$ 23 19 9 0
0.20 0.25 0.20 0.10 L073 1,776$ 126 0.940 12953 103 25 32 25 13 355$ 444$ 355$ 178$ 21 26 21 10
0.15 0.20 0.20 0.15 L074 1,552$ 139 0.700 11494 83 21 28 28 21 233$ 310$ 310$ 233$ 12 17 17 12
0.10 0.15 0.25 0.20 L075 1,552$ 210 0.700 16763 80 21 32 53 42 155$ 233$ 388$ 310$ 8 12 20 16
0.00 0.05 0.15 0.25 L076 1,687$ 311 0.700 24204 78 0 16 47 78 -$ 84$ 253$ 422$ 0 4 12 19
0.00 0.00 0.10 0.30 L077 1,687$ 311 0.700 24204 78 0 0 31 93 -$ -$ 169$ 506$ 0 0 8 23
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 120 139 192 247 1,556$ 1,580$ 1,612$ 1,649$ 81 85 86 81
Flood
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Luminaire 2020
Estimated
Luminaire
Cost
2017
System
Watts
LED L70
lifetime
hours
(LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.10 0.05 0.00 0.00 L126 979$ 71 0.700 4840 68 7 4 0 0 98$ 49$ -$ -$ 7 3 0 0
0.20 0.10 0.00 0.00 L127 979$ 52 0.700 7725 149 10 5 0 0 196$ 98$ -$ -$ 30 15 0 0
0.25 0.20 0.10 0.00 L078 979$ 106 0.700 7725 73 27 21 11 0 245$ 196$ 98$ -$ 18 15 7 0
0.20 0.25 0.20 0.10 L128 1,047$ 155 0.700 10825 70 31 39 31 16 209$ 262$ 209$ 105$ 14 17 14 7
0.15 0.20 0.20 0.15 L079 1,552$ 210 0.700 15099 72 32 42 42 32 233$ 310$ 310$ 233$ 11 14 14 11
0.10 0.20 0.30 0.30 L129 1,687$ 261 0.700 18952 73 26 52 78 78 169$ 337$ 506$ 506$ 7 15 22 22
0.00 0.00 0.20 0.45 L130 1,687$ 261 0.700 18952 73 0 0 52 117 -$ -$ 337$ 759$ 0 0 15 33
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 133 163 214 243 1,149$ 1,252$ 1,461$ 1,603$ 87 79 72 72
Average: 126 151 203 245 1,353$ 1,416$ 1,536$ 1,626$ 84 82 79 77
Weighted Cost Weighted LPWWeightingWeighted 2017 Watt2017 LED Equivalency
Weighted LPWWeightingWeighted CostWeighted 2017 Watt2017 LED Equivalency
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 171
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 94
Table 68: Hardscape Ornamental Lighting Calculation Results and LPA Recommendations in Red
Table 69: Hardscape Ornamental Lighting Legacy Product Calculation
Table 70: Hardscape Ornamental Lighting Equivalent LED Calculation
LZ1 LZ2 L Z3 LZ4
Allowance 0 0.02 0.04 0.06 W/sf
LPW 15 16 14 13 lm/W
LPW 68 67 61 57 lm/W
Limit of Reduction 0.000 0.005 0.009 0.013 Limit of Reduction
Proposed LPA 0 0.007 0.013 0.019 W/sf
2016
2019
Decorative Area
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Lamp
Wattage
Lamp
Type
Luminaire 2020
Estimated
Luminaire
Cost
System
Watts
Luminaire
Lumen
Depreciation
(LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.25 0.15 0.10 0.05 50 PSMH E132 3,719$ 67 0.670 584 9 2 1 1 0 17 10 7 3 779$ 467$ 312$ 156$
0.20 0.25 0.20 0.20 70 PSMH E133 3,719$ 92 0.740 928 10 2 3 2 2 18 23 18 18 623$ 779$ 623$ 623$
0.15 0.20 0.30 0.25 100 PSMH E134 3,719$ 129 0.750 1256 10 1 2 3 2 19 26 39 32 467$ 623$ 935$ 779$
0.05 0.05 0.15 0.30 150 PSMH E135 3,719$ 190 0.740 1652 9 0 0 1 3 10 10 29 57 156$ 156$ 467$ 935$
0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 42 CFL E099 585$ 46 0.860 1237 27 5 4 3 1 9 7 5 2 107$ 80$ 54$ 27$
0.15 0.20 0.15 0.15 57 CFL E100 610$ 62 0.860 1662 27 4 5 4 4 9 12 9 9 84$ 112$ 84$ 84$
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 16 14 13 83 88 106 123 2,215$ 2,217$ 2,473$ 2,602$
Average: 15 16 14 13 83 88 106 123 2,215$ 2,217$ 2,473$ 2,602$
Weighting Weighted Watt Weighted CostWeighted LPW2008 Basis of Design
Decorative Area
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Luminaire 2020
Estimated
Luminaire
Cost
2017
System
Watts
LED L70
lifetime
hours (LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.25 0.15 0.10 0.05 L132 1,296$ 25 0.970 1775 71 6 4 3 1 324$ 194$ 130$ 65$ 18 11 7 4
0.20 0.25 0.20 0.20 L133 1,296$ 43 0.970 2947 69 9 11 9 9 259$ 324$ 259$ 259$ 14 17 14 14
0.15 0.20 0.30 0.25 L134 1,531$ 48 0.850 2135 44 7 10 14 12 230$ 306$ 459$ 383$ 7 9 13 11
0.05 0.05 0.15 0.30 L135 2,420$ 85 0.850 3585 42 4 4 13 26 121$ 121$ 363$ 726$ 2 2 6 13
0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 L099 1,197$ 14 0.700 1130 81 3 2 1 1 239$ 179$ 120$ 60$ 16 12 8 4
0.15 0.20 0.15 0.15 L100 1,124$ 21 0.700 1695 81 3 4 3 3 169$ 225$ 169$ 169$ 12 16 12 12
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 32 35 43 51 1,342$ 1,350$ 1,499$ 1,661$ 68 67 61 57
Average: 32 35 43 51 1,342$ 1,350$ 1,499$ 1,661$ 68 67 61 57
Weighted LPWWeightingWeighted CostWeighted 2017 Watt2017 LED Equivalency
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 172
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 95
Table 71: Building Facades Calculation Results and LPA Recommendations in Red
LZ1 LZ2 L Z3 LZ4
Allowance 0.000 0.180 0.350 0.500 W/sq.ft.
LPW 28 29 30 29 lm/W
LPW 48 58 68 73 lm/W
Limit of Reduction 0.000 0.091 0.153 0.198 Limit of Reduction
Proposed LPA 0.000 0.100 0.170 0.225 W/sq.ft.
2016
2019
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 173
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 96
Table 72: Building Facades Legacy Product Calculation
Wall Mounted Full Cutoff
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Lamp
Wattage
Lamp
Type
Luminaire 2020
Estimated
Luminaire
Cost
System
Watts
Luminaire
Lumen
Depreciation
(LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per
Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.10 0.10 0.05 0.05 26 CFL E012 343$ 28 0.858 927 33 3 3 2 2 3 3 1 1 34$ 34$ 17$ 17$
0.15 0.10 0.10 0.05 32 CFL E013 362$ 35 0.860 1,238 35 5 4 4 2 5 4 4 2 54$ 36$ 36$ 18$
0.30 0.25 0.20 0.10 42 CFL E014 392$ 46 0.860 1,651 36 11 9 7 4 14 12 9 5 118$ 98$ 78$ 39$
0.15 0.20 0.10 0.20 50 PSMH E023 600$ 67 0.670 1,225 18 3 4 2 4 10 13 7 13 90$ 120$ 60$ 120$
0.15 0.20 0.15 0.10 70 PSMH E001 303$ 92 0.740 3,253 35 5 7 5 4 14 18 14 9 45$ 61$ 45$ 30$
0.10 0.05 0.20 0.20 100 PSMH E025 606$ 129 0.750 2,949 23 2 1 5 5 13 6 26 26 61$ 30$ 121$ 121$
0.05 0.05 0.15 0.20 150 PSMH E026 548$ 190 0.740 4,364 23 1 1 3 5 10 10 29 38 27$ 27$ 82$ 110$
0.00 0.05 0.05 0.10 250 PSMH E042 328$ 291 0.700 4,721 16 0 1 1 2 0 15 15 29 -$ 16$ 16$ 33$
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 31 30 28 25 68 80 103 123 430$ 423$ 457$ 488$
Ground Mounted Floodlight
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Lamp
Wattage
Lamp
Type
Luminaire 2020
Estimated
Luminaire
Cost
System
Watts
Luminaire
Lumen
Depreciation
(LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per
Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
1.00 0.45 0.25 0.25 100 PSMH E038 611$ 129 0.750 4,424 34 34 15 9 9 129 58 32 32 611$ 275$ 153$ 153$
0.00 0.45 0.50 0.35 175 PSMH E039 957$ 198 0.700 7,680 39 0 17 19 14 0 89 99 69 -$ 431$ 479$ 335$
0.00 0.10 0.25 0.40 250 PSMH E040 957$ 291 0.700 10,081 35 0 3 9 14 0 29 73 116 -$ 96$ 239$ 383$
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 34 36 37 36 129 176 204 218 611$ 801$ 871$ 871$
Cylindrical
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Lamp
Wattage
Lamp
Type
Luminaire 2020
Estimated
Luminaire
Cost
System
Watts
Luminaire
Lumen
Depreciation
(LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per
Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.30 0.15 0.05 0.00 50 MR16 E002 187$ 50 0.900 752 15 5 2 1 0 15 8 3 0 56$ 28$ 9$ -$
0.30 0.15 0.10 0.05 75 MR16 E003 187$ 75 0.900 1,062 14 4 2 1 1 23 11 8 4 56$ 28$ 19$ 9$
0.15 0.30 0.25 0.10 50 PSMH E034 752$ 67 0.670 1,493 22 3 7 6 2 10 20 17 7 113$ 226$ 188$ 75$
0.15 0.25 0.35 0.25 70 PSMH E035 752$ 92 0.740 2,432 26 4 7 9 7 14 23 32 23 113$ 188$ 263$ 188$
0.10 0.15 0.25 0.60 100 PSMH E036 752$ 129 0.750 3,593 28 3 4 7 17 13 19 32 77 75$ 113$ 188$ 451$
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 22 24 26 74 81 91 111 413$ 582$ 667$ 724$
Average: 28 29 30 29 90 113 133 151 484$ 602$ 665$ 694$
Weighting Weighted Watt Weighted CostWeighted LPW2008 Basis of Design
Weighting Weighted Watt Weighted CostWeighted LPW2008 Basis of Design
Weighting Weighted Watt Weighted CostWeighted LPW2008 Basis of Design
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 174
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 97
Table 73: Building Facades Equivalent LED Calculation
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 175
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 98
Table 74: Outdoor Sales Lots Calculation Results and LPA Recommendations in Red
Table 75: Outdoor Sales Lots Legacy Product Calculation
LZ1 LZ2 L Z3 LZ4
Allowance 0.164 0.555 0.758 1.285 W/sq.ft.
LPW 29 29 30 30 lm/W
LPW 98 96 100 97 lm/W
Limit of Reduction 0.049 0.170 0.224 0.392 Limit of Reduction
Proposed LPA 0.060 0.210 0.280 0.485 W/sq.ft.
2016
2019
Wall Mounted
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Lamp
Wattage
Lamp
Type
Luminaire 2020
Estimated
Luminaire
Cost
System
Watts
Luminaire
Lumen
Depreciation
(LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.10 0.05 0.00 0.00 100 PSMH E025 606$ 129 0.750 2,949 23 2 1 0 0 13 6 0 0 61$ 30$ -$ -$
0.20 0.10 0.15 0.05 150 PSMH E026 548$ 190 0.740 4,364 23 5 2 3 1 38 19 29 10 110$ 55$ 82$ 27$
0.25 0.15 0.20 0.15 175 PSMH E042 328$ 198 0.700 4,721 24 6 4 5 4 50 30 40 30 82$ 49$ 66$ 49$
0.25 0.30 0.30 0.30 250 PSMH E043 535$ 291 0.700 6,787 23 6 7 7 7 73 87 87 87 134$ 161$ 161$ 161$
0.20 0.40 0.35 0.50 320 PSMH E044 535$ 368 0.700 8,705 24 5 9 8 12 74 147 129 184 107$ 214$ 187$ 268$
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 23 23 23 24 247 290 284 311 493$ 509$ 496$ 505$
Area
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Lamp
Wattage
Lamp
Type
Luminaire 2020
Estimated
Luminaire
Cost
System
Watts
Luminaire
Lumen
Depreciation
(LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.10 0.05 0.00 0.00 100 PSMH E070 1,010$ 129 0.750 3,876 30 3 2 0 0 13 6 0 0 101$ 51$ -$ -$
0.20 0.10 0.15 0.05 150 PSMH E048 774$ 190 0.740 8,037 42 8 4 6 2 38 19 29 10 155$ 77$ 116$ 39$
0.25 0.15 0.20 0.15 175 PSMH E037 1,062$ 198 0.700 5,895 30 7 4 6 4 50 30 40 30 266$ 159$ 212$ 159$
0.25 0.30 0.30 0.30 250 PSMH E073 1,205$ 291 0.700 9,801 34 8 10 10 10 73 87 87 87 301$ 361$ 361$ 361$
0.20 0.40 0.35 0.50 400 PSMH E075 1,205$ 452 0.700 17,046 38 8 15 13 19 90 181 158 226 241$ 482$ 422$ 602$
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 35 35 36 36 264 323 314 353 1,063$ 1,131$ 1,112$ 1,162$
Average: 29 29 30 30 255 306 299 332 778$ 820$ 804$ 833$
Weighting Weighted LPW Weighted Watt Weighted Cost2008 Basis of Design
Weighting Weighted Watt Weighted CostWeighted LPW2008 Basis of Design
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 176
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 99
Table 76: Outdoor Sales Lots Equivalent LED Calculation
Table 77: Vehicle Service Station Hardscape Calculation Results and LPA Recommendations in Red
Wall Mounted
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Luminaire 2020
Estimated
Luminaire
Cost
2017
System
Watts
LED L70
lifetime
hours (LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.10 0.05 0.00 0.00 L025 608$ 55 0.700 2904 53 6 3 0 0 61$ 30$ -$ -$ 5 3 0 0
0.20 0.10 0.15 0.05 L026 608$ 37 0.700 4164 113 7 4 6 2 122$ 61$ 91$ 30$ 23 11 17 6
0.25 0.15 0.20 0.15 L042 608$ 37 0.940 5592 151 9 6 7 6 152$ 91$ 122$ 91$ 38 23 30 23
0.25 0.30 0.30 0.30 L043 608$ 55 0.700 5633 102 14 17 17 17 152$ 182$ 182$ 182$ 26 31 31 31
0.20 0.40 0.35 0.50 L044 979$ 106 0.887 9789 92 21 42 37 53 196$ 392$ 343$ 490$ 18 37 32 46
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 57 71 67 77 682$ 756$ 738$ 793$ 110 104 110 105
Area
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Luminaire 2020
Estimated
Luminaire
Cost
2017
System
Watts
LED L70
lifetime
hours (LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.10 0.05 0.00 0.00 L070 1,128$ 67 0.940 3677 55 7 3 0 0 113$ 56$ -$ -$ 5 3 0 0
0.20 0.10 0.15 0.05 L048 1,309$ 105 0.887 8601 82 21 11 16 5 262$ 131$ 196$ 65$ 16 8 12 4
0.25 0.15 0.20 0.15 L037 1,365$ 85 0.938 7865 93 21 13 17 13 341$ 205$ 273$ 205$ 23 14 19 14
0.25 0.30 0.30 0.30 L073 1,776$ 126 0.940 12953 103 32 38 38 38 444$ 533$ 533$ 533$ 26 31 31 31
0.20 0.40 0.35 0.50 L075 1,552$ 210 0.700 16763 80 42 84 74 105 310$ 621$ 543$ 776$ 16 32 28 40
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 122 148 144 161 1,470$ 1,545$ 1,545$ 1,579$ 87 88 90 89
Average: 90 110 105 119 1,076$ 1,151$ 1,141$ 1,186$ 98 96 100 97
Weighted 2017 Watt Weighted Cost Weighted LPWWeighting2017 LED Equivalency
Weighted Cost Weighted LPWWeightingWeighted 2017 Watt2017 LED Equivalency
LZ1 LZ2 L Z3 LZ4
Allowance 0.014 0.155 0.308 0.485 W/sq.ft.
LPW 30 30 31 31 lm/W
LPW 77 78 78 82 lm/W
Limit of Reduction 0.0054 0.0599 0.1217 0.1826 Limit of Reduction
Proposed LPA 0.006 0.068 0.138 0.200 W/sq.ft.
2016
2019
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 177
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 100
Table 78: Vehicle Service Station Hardscape Legacy Product Calculation
Table 79: Vehicle Service Station Hardscape Equivalent LED Calculation
Area
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Lamp
Wattage
Lamp
Type
Luminaire 2020
Estimated
Luminaire
Cost
System
Watts
Luminaire
Lumen
Depreciation
(LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per
Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.05 0.05 0.00 0.00 42 CFL E099 585$ 46 0.860 1,237 27 1 1 0 0 2 2 0 0 29$ 29$ -$ -$
0.10 0.05 0.05 0.05 57 CFL E100 610$ 62 0.860 1,662 27 3 1 1 1 6 3 3 3 61$ 30$ 30$ 30$
0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 70 PSMH E069 1,010$ 92 0.740 2,623 29 1 1 1 1 5 5 5 5 51$ 51$ 51$ 51$
0.10 0.10 0.15 0.10 100 PSMH E070 1,010$ 129 0.750 3,876 30 3 3 5 3 13 13 19 13 101$ 101$ 152$ 101$
0.25 0.25 0.25 0.20 150 PSMH E071 1,010$ 190 0.740 5,737 30 8 8 8 6 48 48 48 38 253$ 253$ 253$ 202$
0.30 0.30 0.25 0.30 175 PSMH E037 1,062$ 198 0.700 5,895 30 9 9 7 9 59 59 50 59 319$ 319$ 266$ 319$
0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 250 PSMH E073 1,205$ 291 0.700 9,801 34 5 7 8 10 44 58 73 87 181$ 241$ 301$ 361$
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 30 30 31 31 177 188 197 205 994$ 1,023$ 1,052$ 1,064$
Average: 30 30 31 31 177 188 197 205 994$ 1,023$ 1,052$ 1,064$
Weighting Weighted Watt Weighted CostWeighted Watt2008 Basis of Design
Area
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Luminaire 2020
Estimated
Luminaire
Cost
2017
System
Watts
LED L70
lifetime
hours
(LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.05 0.05 0.00 0.00 L099 1,197$ 14 0.700 1130 81 1 1 0 0 60$ 60$ -$ -$ 4 4 0 0
0.10 0.05 0.05 0.05 L100 1,124$ 21 0.700 1695 81 2 1 1 1 112$ 56$ 56$ 56$ 8 4 4 4
0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 L069 1,128$ 67 0.940 3677 55 3 3 3 3 56$ 56$ 56$ 56$ 3 3 3 3
0.10 0.10 0.15 0.10 L070 1,128$ 67 0.940 3677 55 7 7 10 7 113$ 113$ 169$ 113$ 5 5 8 5
0.25 0.25 0.25 0.20 L071 1,796$ 126 0.940 6958 55 32 32 32 25 449$ 449$ 449$ 359$ 14 14 14 11
0.30 0.30 0.25 0.30 L037 1,365$ 85 0.938 7865 93 26 26 21 26 409$ 409$ 341$ 409$ 28 28 23 28
0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 L073 1,776$ 126 0.940 12953 103 19 25 32 38 266$ 355$ 444$ 533$ 15 21 26 31
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 89 94 99 100 1,466$ 1,499$ 1,516$ 1,527$ 77 78 78 82
Average: 89 94 99 100 1,466$ 1,499$ 1,516$ 1,527$ 77 78 78 82
Weighted LPWWeightingWeighted CostWeighted 2017 Watt2017 LED Equivalency
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 178
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 101
Table 80: Vehicle Service Station Canopies Calculation Results and LPA Recommendations in Red
Table 81: Vehicle Service Station Canopies Legacy Product Calculation
LZ1 LZ2 L Z3 LZ4
Allowance 0.514 1.005 1.300 2.200 W/sq.ft.
LPW 26 26 26 26 lm/W
LPW 70 70 67 65 lm/W
Limit of Reduction 0.1892 0.3737 0.5092 0.8898 Limit of Reduction
Proposed LPA 0.220 0.430 0.580 1.010 W/sf
2016
2019
Downlight
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Lamp
Wattage
Lamp
Type
Luminaire 2020
Estimated
Luminaire
Cost
System
Watts
Luminaire
Lumen
Depreciation
(LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.15 0.15 0.05 0.05 70 PSMH E049 588$ 92 0.740 2,234 24 4 4 1 1 14 14 5 5 88$ 88$ 29$ 29$
0.20 0.20 0.20 0.10 100 PSMH E050 477$ 129 0.750 3,683 29 6 6 6 3 26 26 26 13 95$ 95$ 95$ 48$
0.30 0.25 0.20 0.10 175 PSMH E058 458$ 198 0.700 5,584 28 8 7 6 3 59 50 40 20 137$ 115$ 92$ 46$
0.35 0.40 0.55 0.75 250 PSMH E059 458$ 291 0.700 8,028 28 10 11 15 21 102 116 160 218 160$ 183$ 252$ 343$
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 27 27 28 28 201 206 230 256 481$ 481$ 468$ 466$
Recessed Downlights, Fresnel Lens
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Lamp
Wattage
Lamp
Type
Luminaire 2020
Estimated
Luminaire
Cost
System
Watts
Luminaire
Lumen
Depreciation
(LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.05 0.05 0.00 0.00 (2) 32 CFL E051 460$ 68 0.860 1,876 28 1 1 0 0 3 3 0 0 23$ 23$ -$ -$
0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 (2) 42 CFL E052 467$ 93 0.860 2,276 24 1 1 1 1 5 5 5 5 23$ 23$ 23$ 23$
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.10 (2) 57 CFL E053 447$ 128 0.860 2,800 22 0 1 2 2 0 6 13 13 -$ 22$ 45$ 45$
0.10 0.05 0.00 0.00 50 PSMH E054 346$ 67 0.670 1,337 20 2 1 0 0 7 3 0 0 35$ 17$ -$ -$
0.20 0.10 0.05 0.05 70 PSMH E055 369$ 92 0.740 2,177 24 5 2 1 1 18 9 5 5 74$ 37$ 18$ 18$
0.25 0.20 0.10 0.10 100 PSMH E056 369$ 129 0.750 3,216 25 6 5 2 2 32 26 13 13 92$ 74$ 37$ 37$
0.35 0.50 0.70 0.70 150 PSMH E057 499$ 190 0.740 4,759 25 9 13 18 18 67 95 133 133 174$ 249$ 349$ 349$
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 24 25 25 25 132 148 168 168 422$ 446$ 472$ 472$
Average: 26 26 26 26 166 177 199 212 451$ 464$ 470$ 469$
Weighting Weighted Watt Weighted CostWeighted LPW2008 Basis of Design
Weighting Weighted Watt Weighted CostWeighted LPW2008 Basis of Design
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 179
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 102
Table 82: Vehicle Service Station Canopies Equivalent LED Calculation
Table 83: Sales Canopies Calculation Results and LPA Recommendations in Red
Downlight
LZ1 LZ2 L Z3 LZ4 Luminaire 2020
Estimated
Luminaire Cost
2017
System
Watts
LED L70
lifetime
hours
(LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 L Z3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.15 0.15 0.05 0.05 L049 310.33$ 28 0.969 3253 116 4 4 1 1 47$ 47$ 16$ 16$ 17 17 6 6
0.20 0.20 0.20 0.10 L050 358.41$ 45 0.960 4751 106 9 9 9 5 72$ 72$ 72$ 36$ 21 21 21 11
0.30 0.25 0.20 0.10 L058 363.33$ 92 0.700 5479 60 28 23 18 9 109$ 91$ 73$ 36$ 18 15 12 6
0.35 0.40 0.55 0.75 L059 363.33$ 92 0.700 5479 60 32 37 51 69 127$ 145$ 200$ 272$ 21 24 33 45
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 73 73 79 84 354$ 354$ 360$ 360$ 77 77 72 67
Recessed Downlights, Fresnel Lens
LZ1 LZ2 L Z3 LZ4 Luminaire 2020
Estimated
Luminaire Cost
2017
System
Watts
LED L70
lifetime
hours
(LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 L Z3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.05 0.05 0.00 0.00 L051 242.59$ 31.6 0.700 1603 51 2 2 0 0 12$ 12$ -$ -$ 3 3 0 0
0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 L052 255.70$ 41.1 0.700 2078 51 2 2 2 2 13$ 13$ 13$ 13$ 3 3 3 3
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.10 L053 267.72$ 47.1 0.700 2191 47 0 2 5 5 -$ 13$ 27$ 27$ 0 2 5 5
0.10 0.05 0.00 0.00 L054 236.30$ 24.1 0.700 1540 64 2 1 0 0 24$ 12$ -$ -$ 6 3 0 0
0.20 0.10 0.05 0.05 L055 256.79$ 34.6 0.700 2130 62 7 3 2 2 51$ 26$ 13$ 13$ 12 6 3 3
0.25 0.20 0.10 0.10 L056 281.38$ 42.3 0.700 2909 69 11 8 4 4 70$ 56$ 28$ 28$ 17 14 7 7
0.35 0.50 0.70 0.70 L057 364.70$ 72.2 0.700 4635 64 25 36 51 51 128$ 182$ 255$ 255$ 22 32 45 45
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 49 55 63 63 298$ 314$ 336$ 336$ 63 63 62 62
Average: 61 64 71 74 326$ 334$ 348$ 348$ 70 70 67 65
Weighted Cost Weighted LPWWeightingWeighted 2017 Watt2017 LED Equivalency
Weighted Cost Weighted LPWWeightingWeighted 2017 Watt2017 LED Equivalency
LZ1 LZ2 L Z3 LZ4
Allowance 0.000 0.655 0.908 1.135 W/sq.ft
LPW 44 44 43 43 lm/W
LPW 60 62 64 65 lm/W
Limit of Reduction 0.0000 0.4621 0.6078 0.7445 Limit of Reduction
Proposed LPA 0.000 0.470 0.622 0.740 W/sq.ft
2016
2019
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 180
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 103
Table 84: Sales Canopies Legacy Product Calculation
Downlight
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Lamp
Wattage
Lamp
Type
Luminaire 2020
Estimated
Luminaire
Cost
System
Watts
Luminaire
Lumen
Depreciation
(LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per
Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 13 CFL E004 151.89$ 16 0.855 476 30 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 8$ -$ -$ -$
0.05 0.05 0.00 0.00 18 CFL E005 161.72$ 20 0.856 693 35 2 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 8$ 8$ -$ -$
0.05 0.05 0.05 0.00 26 CFL E027 365.65$ 28 0.858 696 25 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 18$ 18$ 18$ -$
0.10 0.05 0.05 0.05 32 CFL E028 365.65$ 35 0.860 930 27 3 1 1 1 4 2 2 2 37$ 18$ 18$ 18$
0.10 0.10 0.05 0.05 42 CFL E029 392.22$ 46 0.860 1,240 27 3 3 1 1 5 5 2 2 39$ 39$ 20$ 20$
0.15 0.10 0.10 0.10 (2) 32 CFL E051 460.04$ 68 0.860 1,876 28 4 3 3 3 10 7 7 7 69$ 46$ 46$ 46$
0.15 0.10 0.10 0.10 (2) 42 CFL E052 466.59$ 93 0.860 2,276 24 4 2 2 2 14 9 9 9 70$ 47$ 47$ 47$
0.05 0.05 0.05 0.10 (2) 57 CFL E053 447.10$ 128 0.860 2,800 22 1 1 1 2 6 6 6 13 22$ 22$ 22$ 45$
0.15 0.05 0.05 0.05 50 PSMH E054 345.98$ 67 0.670 1,337 20 3 1 1 1 10 3 3 3 52$ 17$ 17$ 17$
0.10 0.15 0.15 0.05 70 PSMH E055 369.26$ 92 0.740 2,177 24 2 4 4 1 9 14 14 5 37$ 55$ 55$ 18$
0.05 0.15 0.15 0.10 100 PSMH E056 369.26$ 129 0.750 3,216 25 1 4 4 2 6 19 19 13 18$ 55$ 55$ 37$
0.00 0.10 0.10 0.15 150 PSMH E057 498.52$ 190 0.740 4,759 25 0 3 3 4 0 19 19 29 -$ 50$ 50$ 75$
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 175 PSMH E058 458.07$ 198 0.700 5,584 28 0 1 3 4 0 10 20 30 -$ 23$ 46$ 69$
0.00 0.00 0.05 0.10 250 PSMH E059 457.92$ 291 0.700 8,028 28 0 0 1 3 0 0 15 29 -$ -$ 23$ 46$
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 25 26 25 25 68 97 118 141 378$ 400$ 418$ 437$
Recessed Linear Fluorescent
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Lamp
Wattage
Lamp
Type
Luminaire 2020
Estimated
Luminaire
Cost
System
Watts
Luminaire
Lumen
Depreciation
(LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per
Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.10 0.10 0.05 0.05 25 T8 E119 661.10$ 26 0.921 1,640 63 6 6 3 3 3 3 1 1 66$ 66$ 33$ 33$
0.15 0.10 0.05 0.05 32 T8 E121 680.22$ 33 0.949 2,240 68 10 7 3 3 5 3 2 2 102$ 68$ 34$ 34$
0.15 0.10 0.15 0.10 (2) 32 T8 E118 466.59$ 66 0.949 3,092 47 7 5 7 5 10 7 10 7 70$ 47$ 70$ 47$
0.10 0.10 0.10 0.05 21 T5 E120 702.08$ 25 0.952 2,210 88 9 9 9 4 3 3 3 1 70$ 70$ 70$ 35$
0.15 0.10 0.10 0.05 28 T5 E114 458.95$ 31 0.948 2,006 65 10 6 6 3 5 3 3 2 69$ 46$ 46$ 23$
0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 (2) 21 T5 E123 548.55$ 50 0.952 2,677 54 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 55$ 55$ 55$ 55$
0.15 0.10 0.15 0.15 (2) 28 T5 E117 466.59$ 62 0.948 3,642 59 9 6 9 9 9 6 9 9 70$ 47$ 70$ 70$
0.05 0.10 0.15 0.15 54 T5HO E122 719.83$ 62 0.950 3,800 61 3 6 9 9 3 6 9 9 36$ 72$ 108$ 108$
0.05 0.10 0.10 0.15 (2) 39 T5HO E124 580.24$ 82 0.950 4,452 54 3 5 5 8 4 8 8 12 29$ 58$ 58$ 87$
0.00 0.10 0.05 0.15 (2) 54 T5HO E125 598.27$ 124 0.950 7,600 61 0 6 3 9 0 12 6 19 -$ 60$ 30$ 90$
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 62 62 61 60 46 56 56 67 567$ 588$ 574$ 581$
Average: 44 44 43 43 57 76 87 104 473$ 494$ 496$ 509$
Weighting Weighted Watt Weighted CostWeighted LPW2008 Basis of Design
Weighting Weighted Watt Weighted CostWeighted LPW2008 Basis of Design
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 181
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 104
Table 85: Canopies Equivalent LED Calculation
Downlight
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Luminaire 2020
Estimated
Luminaire
Cost
2017
System
Watts
LED L70
lifetime
hours
(LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 L004 85$ 9 0.700 435 48 0 0 0 0 4$ -$ -$ -$ 2 0 0 0
0.05 0.05 0.00 0.00 L005 85$ 9 0.700 435 48 0 0 0 0 4$ 4$ -$ -$ 2 2 0 0
0.05 0.05 0.05 0.00 L027 136$ 16 0.781 625 39 1 1 1 0 7$ 7$ 7$ -$ 2 2 2 0
0.10 0.05 0.05 0.05 L028 225$ 27 0.700 1222 45 3 1 1 1 23$ 11$ 11$ 11$ 5 2 2 2
0.10 0.10 0.05 0.05 L029 225$ 27 0.700 1222 45 3 3 1 1 23$ 23$ 11$ 11$ 5 5 2 2
0.15 0.10 0.10 0.10 L051 243$ 31.6 0.700 1603 51 5 3 3 3 36$ 24$ 24$ 24$ 8 5 5 5
0.15 0.10 0.10 0.10 L052 256$ 41.1 0.700 2078 51 6 4 4 4 38$ 26$ 26$ 26$ 8 5 5 5
0.05 0.05 0.05 0.10 L053 268$ 47.1 0.700 2191 47 2 2 2 5 13$ 13$ 13$ 27$ 2 2 2 5
0.15 0.05 0.05 0.05 L054 236$ 24.1 0.700 1540 64 4 1 1 1 35$ 12$ 12$ 12$ 10 3 3 3
0.10 0.15 0.15 0.05 L055 257$ 34.6 0.700 2130 62 3 5 5 2 26$ 39$ 39$ 13$ 6 9 9 3
0.05 0.15 0.15 0.10 L056 281$ 42.3 0.700 2909 69 2 6 6 4 14$ 42$ 42$ 28$ 3 10 10 7
0.00 0.10 0.10 0.15 L057 365$ 72.2 0.700 4635 64 0 7 7 11 -$ 36$ 36$ 55$ 0 6 6 10
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 L058 363$ 92 0.700 5479 60 0 5 9 14 -$ 18$ 36$ 54$ 0 3 6 9
0.00 0.00 0.05 0.10 L059 363$ 92 0.700 5479 60 0 0 5 9 -$ -$ 18$ 36$ 0 0 3 6
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 30 39 47 56 224$ 255$ 276$ 297$ 53 56 57 57
Recessed Linear Fluorescent
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Luminaire 2020
Estimated
Luminaire
Cost
2017
System
Watts
LED L70
lifetime
hours
(LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.10 0.10 0.05 0.05 L119 382$ 37 0.954 2033 55 4 4 2 2 38$ 38$ 19$ 19$ 5 5 3 3
0.15 0.10 0.05 0.05 L121 382$ 37 0.954 2709 73 6 4 2 2 57$ 38$ 19$ 19$ 11 7 4 4
0.15 0.10 0.15 0.10 L118 382$ 37 0.954 2709 73 6 4 6 4 57$ 38$ 57$ 38$ 11 7 11 7
0.10 0.10 0.10 0.05 L120 382$ 37 0.954 1792 48 4 4 4 2 38$ 38$ 38$ 19$ 5 5 5 2
0.15 0.10 0.10 0.05 L114 382$ 37 0.954 1792 48 6 4 4 2 57$ 38$ 38$ 19$ 7 5 5 2
0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 L123 382$ 37 0.954 2614 71 4 4 4 4 38$ 38$ 38$ 38$ 7 7 7 7
0.15 0.10 0.15 0.15 L117 382$ 37 0.954 3484 94 6 4 6 6 57$ 38$ 57$ 57$ 14 9 14 14
0.05 0.10 0.15 0.15 L122 382$ 37 0.954 3484 94 2 4 6 6 19$ 38$ 57$ 57$ 5 9 14 14
0.05 0.10 0.10 0.15 L124 778$ 53 0.700 2853 54 3 5 5 8 39$ 78$ 78$ 117$ 3 5 5 8
0.00 0.10 0.05 0.15 L125 832$ 53 0.700 3804 72 0 5 3 8 -$ 83$ 42$ 125$ 0 7 4 11
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 38 40 39 42 402$ 467$ 444$ 509$ 68 68 71 73
Average: 34 40 43 49 313$ 361$ 360$ 403$ 60 62 64 65
Weighted Cost Weighted LPWWeightingWeighted 2017 Watt2017 LED Equivalency
Weighted Cost Weighted LPWWeightingWeighted 2017 Watt2017 LED Equivalency
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 182
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 105
Table 86: Non-sales Canopies and Pedestrian Tunnels Calculation Results and LPA Recommendation in Red
LZ1 LZ2 L Z3 LZ4
Allowance 0.084 0.205 0.408 0.585 W/sq.ft
LPW 49 47 47 46 lm/W
LPW 77 75 76 78 lm/W
Limit of Reduction 0.0536 0.1292 0.2535 0.3472 Limit of Reduction
Proposed LPA 0.057 0.137 0.270 0.370 W/sq.ft
2016
2019
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 183
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 106
Table 87: Non-sales Canopies and Pedestrian Tunnels Legacy Product Calculation
Downlight
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Lamp
Wattage
Lamp
Type
Luminaire 2020
Estimated
Luminaire
Cost
System
Watts
Luminaire
Lumen
Depreciation
(LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 L Z3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 13 CFL E004 152$ 16 0.855 476 30 6 4 3 1 3 2 2 1 30$ 23$ 15$ 8$
0.20 0.20 0.15 0.05 18 CFL E005 162$ 20 0.856 693 35 7 7 5 2 4 4 3 1 32$ 32$ 24$ 8$
0.20 0.20 0.15 0.10 26 CFL E027 366$ 28 0.858 696 25 5 5 4 2 6 6 4 3 73$ 73$ 55$ 37$
0.10 0.10 0.15 0.15 32 CFL E028 366$ 35 0.860 930 27 3 3 4 4 4 4 5 5 37$ 37$ 55$ 55$
0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 42 CFL E029 392$ 46 0.860 1,240 27 1 3 4 5 2 5 7 9 20$ 39$ 59$ 78$
0.10 0.05 0.05 0.05 50 PSMH E054 346$ 67 0.670 1,337 20 2 1 1 1 7 3 3 3 35$ 17$ 17$ 17$
0.10 0.05 0.10 0.10 70 PSMH E049 588$ 92 0.740 2,234 24 2 1 2 2 9 5 9 9 59$ 29$ 59$ 59$
0.05 0.10 0.10 0.15 100 PSMH E050 477$ 129 0.750 3,683 29 1 3 3 4 6 13 13 19 24$ 48$ 48$ 72$
0.00 0.05 0.05 0.15 150 PSMH E057 499$ 190 0.740 4,759 25 0 1 1 4 0 10 10 29 -$ 25$ 25$ 75$
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 28 28 27 27 41 50 56 79 309$ 323$ 357$ 408$
Recessed Linear Fluorescent
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Lamp
Wattage
Lamp
Type
Luminaire 2020
Estimated
Luminaire
Cost
System
Watts
Luminaire
Lumen
Depreciation
(LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 L Z3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 25 T8 E119 661$ 26 0.921 1,640 63 3 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 33$ 33$ 33$ 33$
0.20 0.15 0.15 0.10 32 T8 E121 680$ 33 0.949 2,240 68 14 10 10 7 7 5 5 3 136$ 102$ 102$ 68$
0.20 0.20 0.20 0.15 (2) 32 T8 E118 467$ 66 0.949 3,092 47 9 9 9 7 13 13 13 10 93$ 93$ 93$ 70$
0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 21 T5 E120 702$ 25 0.952 2,210 88 4 4 4 4 1 1 1 1 35$ 35$ 35$ 35$
0.20 0.15 0.15 0.10 28 T5 E114 459$ 31 0.948 2,006 65 13 10 10 6 6 5 5 3 92$ 69$ 69$ 46$
0.05 0.10 0.05 0.05 (2) 21 T5 E123 549$ 50 0.952 2,677 54 3 5 3 3 3 5 3 3 27$ 55$ 27$ 27$
0.20 0.20 0.20 0.15 (2) 28 T5 E117 467$ 62 0.948 3,642 59 12 12 12 9 12 12 12 9 93$ 93$ 93$ 70$
0.00 0.00 0.05 0.10 54 T5HO E122 720$ 62 0.950 3,800 61 0 0 3 6 0 0 3 6 -$ -$ 36$ 72$
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 (2) 39 T5HO E124 580$ 82 0.950 4,452 54 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 4 -$ -$ -$ 29$
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 (2) 54 T5HO E125 598$ 124 0.950 7,600 61 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 12 -$ -$ -$ 60$
0.95 0.90 0.90 0.90 58 54 54 54 43 43 43 53 510$ 481$ 489$ 510$
Gasketed Linear Fluorescent
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Lamp
Wattage
Lamp
Type
Luminaire 2020
Estimated
Luminaire
Cost
System
Watts
Luminaire
Lumen
Depreciation
(LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 L Z3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 17 T8 E082 125$ 19 0.929 1,037 55 3 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 6$ 6$ 6$ 6$
0.20 0.15 0.15 0.10 32 T8 E085 122$ 33 0.949 2,104 64 13 10 10 6 7 5 5 3 24$ 18$ 18$ 12$
0.05 0.10 0.05 0.05 (2) 17 T8 E088 131$ 38 0.929 2,074 55 3 5 3 3 2 4 2 2 7$ 13$ 7$ 7$
0.20 0.20 0.20 0.15 (2) 32 T8 E091 130$ 66 0.949 4,208 64 13 13 13 10 13 13 13 10 26$ 26$ 26$ 20$
0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 14 T5 E081 139$ 17 0.944 859 51 3 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 7$ 7$ 7$ 7$
0.20 0.15 0.15 0.10 28 T5 E084 142$ 31 0.948 1,853 60 12 9 9 6 6 5 5 3 28$ 21$ 21$ 14$
0.05 0.10 0.05 0.05 (2) 14 T5 E087 148$ 34 0.944 1,719 51 3 5 3 3 2 3 2 2 7$ 15$ 7$ 7$
0.20 0.20 0.20 0.15 (2) 28 T5 E090 146$ 62 0.948 4,133 67 13 13 13 10 12 12 12 9 29$ 29$ 29$ 22$
0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 24 T5HO E083 144$ 27 0.950 1,427 53 0 0 3 3 0 0 1 1 -$ -$ 7$ 7$
0.00 0.00 0.05 0.10 54 T5HO E086 141$ 62 0.950 3,569 58 0 0 3 6 0 0 3 6 -$ -$ 7$ 14$
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 (2) 24 T5HO E089 144$ 54 0.950 2,561 47 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 -$ -$ -$ 7$
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 (2) 54 T5HO E092 148$ 124 0.950 5,453 44 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 12 -$ -$ -$ 15$
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 61 60 61 58 44 44 45 54 135$ 136$ 136$ 138$
Average: 49 47 47 46 43 46 48 62 318$ 313$ 327$ 352$
Weighting Weighted Watt Weighted CostWeighted LPW2008 Basis of Design
Weighting Weighted Watt Weighted CostWeighted LPW2008 Basis of Design
Weighting Weighted Watt Weighted CostWeighted LPW2008 Basis of Design
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 184
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 107
Table 88: Non-sales Canopies and Pedestrian Tunnels Equivalent LED Calculation
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 185
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 108
Table 89: Guard Stations Calculation Results and LPA Recommendations in Red
LZ1 LZ2 L Z3 LZ4
Allowance 0.154 0.355 0.708 0.985 W/sq.ft.
LPW 34 33 31 31 lm/W
LPW 71 74 77 84 lm/W
Limit of Reduction 0.0742 0.1587 0.2887 0.3674 Limit of Reduction
Proposed LPA 0.081 0.176 0.325 0.425 W/sq.ft.
2016
2019
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 186
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 109
Table 90: Guard Stations Legacy Product Calculation
Wall Pack
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Lamp
Wattage
Lamp
Type
Luminaire 2020
Estimated
Luminaire
Cost
System
Watts
Luminaire
Lumen
Depreciation
(LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 L Z4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.20 0.10 0.05 0.05 26 CFL E020 466.59$ 28 0.858 709 25 5 3 1 1 6 3 1 1 93$ 47$ 23$ 23$
0.25 0.15 0.05 0.05 32 CFL E021 469.87$ 35 0.860 947 27 7 4 1 1 9 5 2 2 117$ 70$ 23$ 23$
0.25 0.20 0.10 0.05 42 CFL E022 469.87$ 46 0.860 1,262 27 7 5 3 1 12 9 5 2 117$ 94$ 47$ 23$
0.15 0.25 0.25 0.15 70 PSMH E024 599.91$ 92 0.740 1,996 22 3 5 5 3 14 23 23 14 90$ 150$ 150$ 90$
0.10 0.15 0.25 0.20 100 PSMH E025 606.46$ 129 0.750 2,949 23 2 3 6 5 13 19 32 26 61$ 91$ 152$ 121$
0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 150 PSMH E026 548.07$ 190 0.740 4,364 23 1 2 3 5 10 19 29 38 27$ 55$ 82$ 110$
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.20 175 PSMH E042 327.82$ 198 0.700 4,721 24 0 1 2 5 0 10 20 40 -$ 16$ 33$ 66$
0.00 0.00 0.05 0.10 250 PSMH E043 535.44$ 291 0.700 6,787 23 0 0 1 2 0 0 15 29 -$ -$ 27$ 54$
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 25 24 23 24 62 89 126 152 506$ 523$ 537$ 510$
Area
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Lamp
Wattage
Lamp
Type
Luminaire 2020
Estimated
Luminaire
Cost
System
Watts
Luminaire
Lumen
Depreciation
(LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 L Z4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.05 0.05 0.00 0.00 18 CFL E104 3,719.47$ 20 0.856 746 37 2 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 186$ 186$ -$ -$
0.20 0.10 0.05 0.05 26 CFL E105 3,719.47$ 28 0.858 1,077 38 8 4 2 2 6 3 1 1 744$ 372$ 186$ 186$
0.20 0.15 0.05 0.05 32 CFL E106 3,719.47$ 35 0.860 1,440 41 8 6 2 2 7 5 2 2 744$ 558$ 186$ 186$
0.25 0.20 0.10 0.05 42 CFL E107 3,719.47$ 46 0.860 1,920 42 10 8 4 2 12 9 5 2 930$ 744$ 372$ 186$
0.15 0.20 0.25 0.15 70 PSMH E069 1,010.17$ 92 0.740 2,623 29 4 6 7 4 14 18 23 14 152$ 202$ 253$ 152$
0.10 0.15 0.25 0.20 100 PSMH E070 1,010.17$ 129 0.750 3,876 30 3 5 8 6 13 19 32 26 101$ 152$ 253$ 202$
0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 150 PSMH E071 1,010.17$ 190 0.740 5,737 30 2 3 5 6 10 19 29 38 51$ 101$ 152$ 202$
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.20 175 PSMH E037 1,062.13$ 198 0.700 5,895 30 0 1 3 6 0 10 20 40 -$ 53$ 106$ 212$
0.00 0.00 0.05 0.10 250 PSMH E073 1,204.80$ 291 0.700 9,801 34 0 0 2 3 0 0 15 29 -$ -$ 60$ 120$
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 37 35 32 32 61 85 126 152 2,907$ 2,367$ 1,567$ 1,446$
Floodlight
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Lamp
Wattage
Lamp
Type
Luminaire 2020
Estimated
Luminaire
Cost
System
Watts
Luminaire
Lumen
Depreciation
(LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 L Z4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.40 0.35 0.20 0.20 100 PSMH E126 1,261.01$ 129 0.750 5,315 41 16 14 8 8 52 45 26 26 504$ 441$ 252$ 252$
0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 150 PSMH E127 1,276.31$ 190 0.740 7,728 41 10 10 10 10 48 48 48 48 319$ 319$ 319$ 319$
0.20 0.20 0.30 0.25 175 PSMH E078 1,044.65$ 198 0.700 8,053 41 8 8 12 10 40 40 59 50 209$ 209$ 313$ 261$
0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 250 PSMH E016 1,165.25$ 291 0.700 9,660 33 5 7 8 10 44 58 73 87 175$ 233$ 291$ 350$
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 40 39 39 39 182 190 205 210 1,207$ 1,202$ 1,176$ 1,182$
Average: 34 33 31 31 102 121 152 171 1,540$ 1,364$ 1,093$ 1,046$
Weighting Weighted Watt Weighted Cost2008 Basis of Design Weighted LPW
Weighting Weighted Watt Weighted Cost2008 Basis of Design Weighted LPW
Weighting Weighted Watt Weighted CostWeighted LPW2008 Basis of Design
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 187
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 110
Table 91: Guard Station Equivalent LED Calculation
Wall Pack
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Luminaire 2020
Estimated
Luminaire Cost
2017 System
Watts
LED L70
lifetime hours
(LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens per
Watt (LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.20 0.10 0.05 0.05 L020 135.90$ 16 0.781 625 39 3 2 1 1 27$ 14$ 7$ 7$ 8$ 4$ 2$ 2$
0.25 0.15 0.05 0.05 L021 135.90$ 16 0.781 625 39 4 2 1 1 34$ 20$ 7$ 7$ 10$ 6$ 2$ 2$
0.25 0.20 0.10 0.05 L022 225.31$ 27 0.700 1222 45 7 5 3 1 56$ 45$ 23$ 11$ 11$ 9$ 5$ 2$
0.15 0.25 0.25 0.15 L024 533.25$ 28 0.700 1693 60 4 7 7 4 80$ 133$ 133$ 80$ 9$ 15$ 15$ 9$
0.10 0.15 0.25 0.20 L025 607.56$ 55 0.700 2904 53 6 8 14 11 61$ 91$ 152$ 122$ 5$ 8$ 13$ 11$
0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 L026 607.56$ 37 0.700 4164 113 2 4 6 7 30$ 61$ 91$ 122$ 6$ 11$ 17$ 23$
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.20 L042 607.56$ 37 0.940 5592 151 0 2 4 7 -$ 30$ 61$ 122$ -$ 8$ 15$ 30$
0.00 0.00 0.05 0.10 L043 607.56$ 55 0.700 5633 102 0 0 3 6 -$ -$ 30$ 61$ -$ -$ 5$ 10$
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 26 30 37 38 289$ 395$ 504$ 530$ 49 61 74 89
Area
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Luminaire 2020
Estimated
Luminaire Cost
2017 System
Watts
LED L70
lifetime hours
(LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens per
Watt (LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.05 0.05 0.00 0.00 L104 1,196.54$ 14 0.700 1130 81 1 1 0 0 60$ 60$ -$ -$ 4$ 4$ -$ -$
0.20 0.10 0.05 0.05 L105 1,196.54$ 14 0.700 1130 81 3 1 1 1 239$ 120$ 60$ 60$ 16$ 8$ 4$ 4$
0.20 0.15 0.05 0.05 L106 1,196.54$ 14 0.700 1130 81 3 2 1 1 239$ 179$ 60$ 60$ 16$ 12$ 4$ 4$
0.25 0.20 0.10 0.05 L107 1,124.14$ 21 0.700 1695 81 5 4 2 1 281$ 225$ 112$ 56$ 20$ 16$ 8$ 4$
0.15 0.20 0.25 0.15 L069 1,127.69$ 67 0.940 3677 55 10 13 17 10 169$ 226$ 282$ 169$ 8$ 11$ 14$ 8$
0.10 0.15 0.25 0.20 L070 1,127.69$ 67 0.940 3677 55 7 10 17 13 113$ 169$ 282$ 226$ 5$ 8$ 14$ 11$
0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 L071 1,796.44$ 126 0.940 6958 55 6 13 19 25 90$ 180$ 269$ 359$ 3$ 6$ 8$ 11$
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.20 L037 1,364.82$ 85 0.938 7865 93 0 4 9 17 -$ 68$ 136$ 273$ -$ 5$ 9$ 19$
0.00 0.00 0.05 0.10 L073 1,775.68$ 126 0.940 12953 103 0 0 6 13 -$ -$ 89$ 178$ -$ -$ 5$ 10$
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 35 49 71 81 1,191$ 1,226$ 1,291$ 1,380$ 73 70 66 71
Floodlight
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Luminaire 2020
Estimated
Luminaire Cost
2017 System
Watts
LED L70
lifetime hours
(LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens per
Watt (LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.40 0.35 0.20 0.20 L126 979.08$ 71 0.700 4840 68 28 25 14 14 392$ 343$ 196$ 196$ 27$ 24$ 14$ 14$
0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 L127 979.08$ 52 0.700 7725 149 13 13 13 13 245$ 245$ 245$ 245$ 37$ 37$ 37$ 37$
0.20 0.20 0.30 0.25 L078 979.08$ 106 0.700 7725 73 21 21 32 27 196$ 196$ 294$ 245$ 15$ 15$ 22$ 18$
0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 L016 834.84$ 166 0.955 12414 75 25 33 42 50 125$ 167$ 209$ 250$ 11$ 15$ 19$ 22$
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 88 92 101 104 957$ 950$ 943$ 936$ 90 91 91 91
Average: 49 57 69 74 812 857 912 949 71 74 77 84
Weighted LPWWeightingWeighted CostWeighted 2017 Watt2017 LED Equivalency
Weighted Cost Weighted LPWWeightingWeighted 2017 Watt2017 LED Equivalency
Weighted Cost Weighted LPWWeightingWeighted 2017 Watt2017 LED Equivalency
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 188
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 111
Table 92: Student Pick-up/Drop Off Zones Calculation Results and LPA Recommendations in Red
LZ1 LZ2 L Z3 LZ4
Allowance 0 0.12 0.45 0 W/sq.ft.
LPW 29 29 29 30 lm/W
LPW 68 69 76 81 lm/W
Limit of Reduction 0.000 0.051 0.174 0.000 Limit of Reduction
Proposed LPA 0.000 0.056 0.200 0.000 W/sf
2016
2019
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 189
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 112
Table 93: Student Pick-Up/Drop-Off Zones Legacy Product Calculation
Downlight
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Lamp
Wattage
Lamp
Type
Luminaire 2020
Estimated
Luminaire
Cost
System
Watts
Luminaire
Lumen
Depreciation
(LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.10 0.10 0.05 0.00 32 CFL E095 314.71$ 35 0.860 940 27 3 3 1 0 4 4 2 0 31$ 31$ 16$ -$
0.25 0.10 0.05 0.05 42 CFL E096 307.06$ 46 0.860 1,254 27 7 3 1 1 12 5 2 2 77$ 31$ 15$ 15$
0.25 0.20 0.20 0.10 70 PSMH E097 292.40$ 92 0.740 1,895 21 5 4 4 2 23 18 18 9 73$ 58$ 58$ 29$
0.15 0.20 0.20 0.25 100 PSMH E098 299.49$ 129 0.750 2,801 22 3 4 4 5 19 26 26 32 45$ 60$ 60$ 75$
0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 150 PSMH E057 498.52$ 190 0.740 4,759 25 4 5 6 8 29 38 48 57 75$ 100$ 125$ 150$
0.10 0.20 0.25 0.30 175 PSMH E058 458.07$ 198 0.700 5,584 28 3 6 7 8 20 40 50 59 46$ 92$ 115$ 137$
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 24 25 24 25 106 130 145 160 347$ 372$ 389$ 406$
Wall Pack
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Lamp
Wattage
Lamp
Type
Luminaire 2020
Estimated
Luminaire
Cost
System
Watts
Luminaire
Lumen
Depreciation
(LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.10 0.10 0.05 0.00 26 CFL E020 466.59$ 28 0.858 709 25 3 3 1 0 3 3 1 0 47$ 47$ 23$ -$
0.15 0.10 0.10 0.05 32 CFL E021 469.87$ 35 0.860 947 27 4 3 3 1 5 4 4 2 70$ 47$ 47$ 23$
0.20 0.15 0.10 0.10 42 CFL E022 469.87$ 46 0.860 1,262 27 5 4 3 3 9 7 5 5 94$ 70$ 47$ 47$
0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 70 PSMH E024 599.91$ 92 0.740 1,996 22 5 4 3 2 23 18 14 9 150$ 120$ 90$ 60$
0.15 0.25 0.15 0.15 100 PSMH E025 606.46$ 129 0.750 2,949 23 3 6 3 3 19 32 19 19 91$ 152$ 91$ 91$
0.10 0.15 0.25 0.20 150 PSMH E026 548.07$ 190 0.740 4,364 23 2 3 6 5 19 29 48 38 55$ 82$ 137$ 110$
0.05 0.05 0.15 0.25 175 PSMH E042 327.82$ 198 0.700 4,721 24 1 1 4 6 10 10 30 50 16$ 16$ 49$ 82$
0.00 0.00 0.05 0.15 250 PSMH E043 535.44$ 291 0.700 6,787 23 0 0 1 3 0 0 15 44 -$ -$ 27$ 80$
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 24 24 24 24 89 102 134 166 523$ 534$ 511$ 493$
Area
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Lamp
Wattage
Lamp
Type
Luminaire 2020
Estimated
Luminaire
Cost
System
Watts
Luminaire
Lumen
Depreciation
(LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.05 0.05 0.00 0.00 18 CFL E104 3,719.47$ 20 0.856 746 37 2 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 186$ 186$ -$ -$
0.05 0.05 0.05 0.00 26 CFL E105 3,719.47$ 28 0.858 1,077 38 2 2 2 0 1 1 1 0 186$ 186$ 186$ -$
0.10 0.10 0.10 0.05 32 CFL E106 3,719.47$ 35 0.860 1,440 41 4 4 4 2 4 4 4 2 372$ 372$ 372$ 186$
0.20 0.15 0.20 0.10 42 CFL E107 3,719.47$ 46 0.860 1,920 42 8 6 8 4 9 7 9 5 744$ 558$ 744$ 372$
0.30 0.20 0.20 0.15 50 PSMH E045 686.23$ 67 0.670 2,257 34 10 7 7 5 20 13 13 10 206$ 137$ 137$ 103$
0.20 0.20 0.20 0.25 70 PSMH E046 686.23$ 92 0.740 3,675 40 8 8 8 10 18 18 18 23 137$ 137$ 137$ 172$
0.05 0.15 0.15 0.25 100 PSMH E047 696.07$ 129 0.750 5,431 42 2 6 6 11 6 19 19 32 35$ 104$ 104$ 174$
0.05 0.10 0.10 0.20 150 PSMH E048 773.75$ 190 0.740 8,037 42 2 4 4 8 10 19 19 38 39$ 77$ 77$ 155$
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 39 39 40 40 70 83 84 110 1,904$ 1,758$ 1,758$ 1,161$
Average: 29 29 29 30 88 105 121 145 925$ 888$ 886$ 687$
2008 Basis of Design
2008 Basis of Design
2008 Basis of Design
Weighting Weighted Watt Weighted Cost
Weighting Weighted Watt Weighted CostWeighted LPW
Weighted LPW
Weighting Weighted Watt Weighted CostWeighted LPW
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 190
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 113
Table 94: Student Pick-Up/Drop-Off Zones Equivalent LED Calculation
Downlight
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Luminaire 2020
Estimated
Luminaire
Cost
2017 System
Watts
LED L70
lifetime
hours (LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.10 0.10 0.05 0.00 L095 140.96$ 13 0.700 732 57 1 1 1 0 14$ 14$ 7$ -$ 6 6 3 0
0.25 0.10 0.05 0.05 L096 154.07$ 21 0.700 1086 53 5 2 1 1 39$ 15$ 8$ 8$ 13 5 3 3
0.25 0.20 0.20 0.10 L097 242.59$ 32 0.700 1603 51 8 6 6 3 61$ 49$ 49$ 24$ 13 10 10 5
0.15 0.20 0.20 0.25 L098 1,127.69$ 67 0.940 3677 55 10 13 13 17 169$ 226$ 226$ 282$ 8 11 11 14
0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 L057 364.70$ 72 0.700 4635 64 11 14 18 22 55$ 73$ 91$ 109$ 10 13 16 19
0.10 0.20 0.25 0.30 L058 363.33$ 92 0.700 5479 60 9 18 23 28 36$ 73$ 91$ 109$ 6 12 15 18
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 44 56 62 70 373$ 449$ 471$ 532$ 55 57 58 59
Wall Pack
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Luminaire 2020
Estimated
Luminaire
Cost
2017 System
Watts
LED L70
lifetime
hours (LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.10 0.10 0.05 0.00 L020 135.90$ 16 0.781 625 39 2 2 1 0 14$ 14$ 7$ -$ 4 4 2 0
0.15 0.10 0.10 0.05 L021 135.90$ 16 0.781 625 39 2 2 2 1 20$ 14$ 14$ 7$ 6 4 4 2
0.20 0.15 0.10 0.10 L022 225.31$ 27 0.700 1222 45 5 4 3 3 45$ 34$ 23$ 23$ 9 7 5 5
0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 L024 533.25$ 28 0.700 1693 60 7 6 4 3 133$ 107$ 80$ 53$ 15 12 9 6
0.15 0.25 0.15 0.15 L025 607.56$ 55 0.700 2904 53 8 14 8 8 91$ 152$ 91$ 91$ 8 13 8 8
0.10 0.15 0.25 0.20 L026 607.56$ 37 0.700 4164 113 4 6 9 7 61$ 91$ 152$ 122$ 11 17 28 23
0.05 0.05 0.15 0.25 L042 607.56$ 37 0.940 5592 151 2 2 6 9 30$ 30$ 91$ 152$ 8 8 23 38
0.00 0.00 0.05 0.15 L043 607.56$ 55 0.700 5633 102 0 0 3 8 -$ -$ 30$ 91$ 0 0 5 15
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 30 34 35 39 395$ 441$ 487$ 538$ 61 64 83 96
Area
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Luminaire 2020
Estimated
Luminaire
Cost
2017 System
Watts
LED L70
lifetime
hours (LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.05 0.05 0.00 0.00 L104 1,196.54$ 14 0.700 1130 81 1 1 0 0 60$ 60$ -$ -$ 4 4 0 0
0.05 0.05 0.05 0.00 L105 1,196.54$ 14 0.700 1130 81 1 1 1 0 60$ 60$ 60$ -$ 4 4 4 0
0.10 0.10 0.10 0.05 L106 1,196.54$ 14 0.700 1130 81 1 1 1 1 120$ 120$ 120$ 60$ 8 8 8 4
0.20 0.15 0.20 0.10 L107 1,124.14$ 21 0.700 1695 81 4 3 4 2 225$ 169$ 225$ 112$ 16 12 16 8
0.30 0.20 0.20 0.15 L045 1,242.43$ 50 0.887 4703 94 15 10 10 8 373$ 248$ 248$ 186$ 28 19 19 14
0.20 0.20 0.20 0.25 L046 1,242.43$ 50 0.887 4703 94 10 10 10 13 248$ 248$ 248$ 311$ 19 19 19 24
0.05 0.15 0.15 0.25 L047 1,275.21$ 80 0.887 6781 85 4 12 12 20 64$ 191$ 191$ 319$ 4 13 13 21
0.05 0.10 0.10 0.20 L048 1,309.09$ 105 0.887 8601 82 5 11 11 21 65$ 131$ 131$ 262$ 4 8 8 16
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 41 48 49 64 1,215$ 1,227$ 1,223$ 1,250$ 88 87 87 87
Average: 39 46 49 58 661$ 706$ 727$ 773$ 68$ 69$ 76$ 81$
2017 LED Equivalency
2017 LED Equivalency
2017 LED Equivalency
Weighted Cost Weighted LPW
Weighting Weighted 2017 Watt Weighted Cost Weighted LPW
Weighting Weighted 2017 Watt
Weighted LPWWeightingWeighted CostWeighted 2017 Watt
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 191
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 114
Table 95: Outdoor Dining Calculation Results and LPA Recommendations in Red
Table 96: Outdoor Dining Legacy Product Calculation
Table 97: Outdoor Dining Equivalent LED Calculation
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
Allowance 0.014 0.135 0.240 0.400 W/sf
LPW 7 6 6 5 lm/W
LPW 48 48 47 45 lm/W
Limit of Reduction 0.002 0.018 0.029 0.047 Limit of Reduction
Proposed LPA 0.004 0.030 0.050 0.075 W/sf
2016
2019
Area
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Lamp
Wattage
Lamp
Type
Luminaire 2020
Estimated
Luminaire
Cost
System
Watts
Luminaire
Lumen
Depreciation
(LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 15 B10 E108 0.70$ 15 0.82 78 5 1 1 0 0 2 2 1 0 0$ 0$ 0$ -$
0.20 0.10 0.05 0.05 25 B10 E109 0.81$ 25 0.82 180 7 1 1 0 0 5 3 1 1 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$
0.25 0.30 0.30 0.20 40 B10 E110 0.73$ 40 0.82 303 8 2 2 2 2 10 12 12 8 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$
0.20 0.30 0.35 0.40 15 G16 E111 0.76$ 15 0.82 86 6 1 2 2 2 3 5 5 6 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$
0.20 0.10 0.05 0.05 25 G16 E112 1.88$ 25 0.82 246 10 2 1 0 0 5 3 1 1 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$
0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 40 G16 E113 0.89$ 40 0.82 77 2 0 0 0 1 0 4 8 12 -$ 0$ 0$ 0$
7 6 6 5 25 27 29 29 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Average:7 6 6 5 25 27 29 29 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$
Weighting Weighted Watt Weighted CostWeighted Watt2008 Basis of Design
Area
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Luminaire 2020
Estimated
Luminaire
Cost
2017 System
Watts
LED L70
lifetime
hours (LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 L108 1.91$ 4 0.700 140 35 1 0 0 0 0$ 0$ 0$ -$ 5 4 2 0
0.20 0.10 0.05 0.05 L109 1.91$ 4 0.700 140 35 1 0 0 0 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 7 4 2 2
0.25 0.30 0.30 0.20 L110 6.31$ 4.5 0.700 315 70 1 1 1 1 2$ 2$ 2$ 1$ 18 21 21 14
0.20 0.30 0.35 0.40 L111 4.36$ 4.5 0.700 126 28 1 1 2 2 1$ 1$ 2$ 2$ 6 8 10 11
0.20 0.10 0.05 0.05 L112 6.55$ 3.5 0.700 228 65 1 0 0 0 1$ 1$ 0$ 0$ 13 7 3 3
0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 L113 6.51$ 5 0.700 245 49 0 1 1 2 -$ 1$ 1$ 2$ 0 5 10 15
4 4 5 5 4$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 48 48 47 45
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Average:4 4 5 5 4$ 5$ 5$ 5$ 48 48 47 45
Weighted LPWWeightingWeighted CostWeighted 2017 Watt2017 LED Equivalency
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 192
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 115
Table 98: Special Security Lighting for Retail Parking and Pedestrian Hardscape Calculation Results and LPA Recommendations in
Red
Table 99: Special Security Lighting for Retail Parking and Pedestrian Hardscape Legacy Product Calculation
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
Allowance 0.007 0.009 0.019 0 W/sq.ft
LPW 31 31 29 29 lm/W
LPW 61 63 66 72 lm/W
Limit of Reduction 0.0036 0.0045 0.0085 0.0000 Limit of Reduction
Proposed LPA 0.004 0.005 0.010 0.000 W/sq.ft
2016
2019
Wall Pack
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Lamp
Wattage
Lamp
Type
Luminaire 2020
Estimated
Luminaire Cost
System
Watts
Luminaire
Lumen
Depreciation
(LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 L Z2 LZ3 LZ4
0.25 0.15 0.10 0.10 26 CFL E020 466.59$ 28 0.858 709 25 6 4 3 3 7 4 3 3 117$ 70$ 47$ 47$
0.25 0.25 0.15 0.15 32 CFL E021 469.87$ 35 0.860 947 27 7 7 4 4 9 9 5 5 117$ 117$ 70$ 70$
0.25 0.25 0.20 0.15 42 CFL E022 469.87$ 46 0.860 1,262 27 7 7 5 4 12 12 9 7 117$ 117$ 94$ 70$
0.10 0.15 0.15 0.10 70 PSMH E024 599.91$ 92 0.740 1,996 22 2 3 3 2 9 14 14 9 60$ 90$ 90$ 60$
0.10 0.10 0.20 0.15 100 PSMH E025 606.46$ 129 0.750 2,949 23 2 2 5 3 13 13 26 19 61$ 61$ 121$ 91$
0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 150 PSMH E026 548.07$ 190 0.740 4,364 23 1 2 3 5 10 19 29 38 27$ 55$ 82$ 110$
0.00 0.00 0.05 0.10 175 PSMH E042 327.82$ 198 0.700 4,721 24 0 0 1 2 0 0 10 20 -$ -$ 16$ 33$
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 250 PSMH E043 535.44$ 291 0.700 6,787 23 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 15 -$ -$ -$ 27$
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 26 25 25 24 59 70 95 116 500$ 510$ 521$ 508$
Area
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Lamp
Wattage
Lamp
Type
Luminaire 2020
Estimated
Luminaire Cost
System
Watts
Luminaire
Lumen
Depreciation
(LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 L Z2 LZ3 LZ4
0.10 0.10 0.05 0.00 18 CFL E104 3,719.47$ 20 0.856 746 37 4 4 2 0 2 2 1 0 372$ 372$ 186$ -$
0.25 0.15 0.10 0.10 26 CFL E105 3,719.47$ 28 0.858 1,077 38 10 6 4 4 7 4 3 3 930$ 558$ 372$ 372$
0.20 0.20 0.15 0.15 32 CFL E106 3,719.47$ 35 0.860 1,440 41 8 8 6 6 7 7 5 5 744$ 744$ 558$ 558$
0.20 0.25 0.15 0.15 42 CFL E107 3,719.47$ 46 0.860 1,920 42 8 10 6 6 9 12 7 7 744$ 930$ 558$ 558$
0.10 0.15 0.15 0.10 70 PSMH E069 1,010.17$ 92 0.740 2,623 29 3 4 4 3 9 14 14 9 101$ 152$ 152$ 101$
0.10 0.10 0.20 0.15 100 PSMH E070 1,010.17$ 129 0.750 3,876 30 3 3 6 5 13 13 26 19 101$ 101$ 202$ 152$
0.05 0.05 0.15 0.20 150 PSMH E071 1,010.17$ 190 0.740 5,737 30 2 2 5 6 10 10 29 38 51$ 51$ 152$ 202$
0.00 0.00 0.05 0.10 175 PSMH E037 1,062.13$ 198 0.700 5,895 30 0 0 1 3 0 0 10 20 -$ -$ 53$ 106$
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 250 PSMH E073 1,204.80$ 291 0.700 9,801 34 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 15 -$ -$ -$ 60$
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 37 37 34 34 57 61 94 116 3,042$ 2,907$ 2,232$ 2,109$
Average: 31 31 29 29 58 66 95 116 1,771$ 1,709$ 1,376$ 1,308$
2008 Basis of Design
2008 Basis of Design
Weighting Weighted Watt Weighted Cost
Weighting Weighted Watt Weighted Cost
Weighted LPW
Weighted LPW
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 193
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 116
Table 100: Special Security Lighting for Retail Parking and Pedestrian Hardscape Equivalent LED Calculation
Energy savings were calculated by the difference in wattage between legacy products and LED products for the specific applications. That
wattage difference was applied on an hour-by-hour basis across an entire year using statewide use schedules. Full load hours of operation vary by
the different specific applications. The operating hours include the impact of outdoor lighting controls.
Wall Pack
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Luminaire 2020
Estimated
Luminaire
Cost
2017 System
Watts
LED L70
lifetime
hours (LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.25 0.15 0.10 0.10 L020 135.90$ 16 0.781 625 39 4 2 2 2 34$ 20$ 14$ 14$ 10 6 4 4
0.25 0.25 0.15 0.15 L021 135.90$ 16 0.781 625 39 4 4 2 2 34$ 34$ 20$ 20$ 10 10 6 6
0.25 0.25 0.20 0.15 L022 225.31$ 27 0.700 1222 45 7 7 5 4 56$ 56$ 45$ 34$ 11 11 9 7
0.10 0.15 0.15 0.10 L024 533.25$ 28 0.700 1693 60 3 4 4 3 53$ 80$ 80$ 53$ 6 9 9 6
0.10 0.10 0.20 0.15 L025 607.56$ 55 0.700 2904 53 6 6 11 8 61$ 61$ 122$ 91$ 5 5 11 8
0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 L026 607.56$ 37 0.700 4164 113 2 4 6 7 30$ 61$ 91$ 122$ 6 11 17 23
0.00 0.00 0.05 0.10 L042 607.56$ 37 0.940 5592 151 0 0 2 4 -$ -$ 30$ 61$ 0 0 8 15
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 L043 607.56$ 55 0.700 5633 102 0 0 0 3 -$ -$ -$ 30$ 0 0 0 5
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 25 27 32 33 269$ 312$ 402$ 425$ 48 53 63 73
Area
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Luminaire 2020
Estimated
Luminaire
Cost
2017 System
Watts
LED L70
lifetime
hours (LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.10 0.10 0.05 0.00 L104 1,196.54$ 14 0.700 1130 81 1 1 1 0 120$ 120$ 60$ -$ 8 8 4 0
0.25 0.15 0.10 0.10 L105 1,196.54$ 14 0.700 1130 81 4 2 1 1 299$ 179$ 120$ 120$ 20 12 8 8
0.20 0.20 0.15 0.15 L106 1,196.54$ 14 0.700 1130 81 3 3 2 2 239$ 239$ 179$ 179$ 16 16 12 12
0.20 0.25 0.15 0.15 L107 1,124.14$ 21 0.700 1695 81 4 5 3 3 225$ 281$ 169$ 169$ 16 20 12 12
0.10 0.15 0.15 0.10 L069 1,127.69$ 67 0.940 3677 55 7 10 10 7 113$ 169$ 169$ 113$ 5 8 8 5
0.10 0.10 0.20 0.15 L070 1,127.69$ 67 0.940 3677 55 7 7 13 10 113$ 113$ 226$ 169$ 5 5 11 8
0.05 0.05 0.15 0.20 L071 1,796.44$ 126 0.940 6958 55 6 6 19 25 90$ 90$ 269$ 359$ 3 3 8 11
0.00 0.00 0.05 0.10 L037 1,364.82$ 85 0.938 7865 93 0 0 4 9 -$ -$ 68$ 136$ 0 0 5 9
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 L073 1,775.68$ 126 0.940 12953 103 0 0 0 6 -$ -$ -$ 89$ 0 0 0 5
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 32 35 54 63 1,198$ 1,191$ 1,260$ 1,334$ 74 73 68 71
Average: 28 31 43 48 734$ 752$ 831$ 880$ 61 63 66 72
2017 LED Equivalency
2017 LED Equivalency Weighted Cost Weighted LPW
Weighted LPWWeightingWeighted CostWeighted 2017 Watt
Weighting Weighted 2017 Watt
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 194
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 117
Appendix F: L UMEN M AINTENANCE D ATA
The General Hardscape models utilized luminaires with longer lumen maintenance than assumed in the 2016 models, based on technology
improvements. Today, many outdoor site and area lighting LED luminaires are offered with L70 values of 100,000 hours or greater. The lumen
maintenance at 60,000 hours is often reported as 90 percent or higher. The table below shows the luminaires used in the General Hardscape
model, listed by Luminaire ID, with make and model redacted. These luminaires are all commercially available and represent offerings from four
different manufacturers.
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 195
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 118
Table 101: General Hardscape LED Luminaire Reported Lumen Maintenance
Luminaire ID Reported Life Reported Lumen
Maintenance at
60,000hr
PL01 100,000 0.990
PL03 100,000 0.990
PL05 100,000 0.990
PL06 60,000 0.930
PL07 60,000 0.930
PL08 60,000 0.700
PL09 60,000 0.700
PL11 100,000 0.840
PL12 100,000 0.840
PL13 154,000 0.910
PL14 100,000 0.887
PL15 100,000 0.887
PL16 100,000 0.887
PL17 100,000 0.887
PL18 100,000 0.887
PL19 90,000 0.864
PL20 100,000 0.887
PL21 100,000 0.887
PL22 100,000 0.887
PL23 100,000 0.887
PL24 100,000 0.887
PL25 100,000 0.887
PL26 154,000 0.910
PL27 154,000 0.910
PL29 150,000 0.950
PL30 150,000 0.950
PL31 150,000 0.950
PL32 150,000 0.950
PL33 150,000 0.950
PL34 150,000 0.950
PL35 150,000 0.950
Average 111,032 0.900
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 196
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 119
Table 102: Specific Applications Light Source Maintenance Period
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 197
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 120
Table 103: Specific Applications LED Luminaire Reported Life
Luminaire
ID
Reported
Life
Reported Lumen
Maintenance at
60,000 hr
L001 100,000 0.960
L002 70,000 0.781
L003 70,000 0.781
L004 50,000 0.700
L005 50,000 0.700
L006 50,000 0.700
L007 50,000 0.700
L008 50,000 0.700
L009 50,000 0.700
L010 50,000 0.700
L011 50,000 0.700
L012 70,000 0.781
L013 60,000 0.700
L014 100,000 0.970
L015 205,000 0.900
L016 205,000 0.900
L017 205,000 0.900
L018 205,000 0.900
L019 205,000 0.900
L020 70,000 0.781
L021 70,000 0.781
L022 60,000 0.700
L023 100,000 0.970
L024 100,000 0.880
L025 100,000 0.880
L026 100,000 0.880
L027 70,000 0.781
L028 60,000 0.700
L029 60,000 0.700
L030 60,000 0.700
L031 60,000 0.700
L032 250,000 0.961
L033 250,000 0.961
L034 60,000 0.700
L035 60,000 0.700
L036 60,000 0.700
L037 150,000 0.938
L038 100,000 0.887
L039 100,000 0.960
L040 100,000 0.960
L041 100,000 0.880
L042 100,000 0.940
L043 100,000 0.880
L044 100,000 0.960
L045 100,000 0.887
Luminaire
ID
Reported
Life
Reported Lumen
Maintenance at
60,000 hr
L046 100,000 0.887
L047 100,000 0.887
L048 100,000 0.887
L049 100,000 0.950
L050 100,000 0.930
L051 60,000 0.700
L052 60,000 0.700
L053 60,000 0.700
L054 60,000 0.700
L055 60,000 0.700
L056 60,000 0.700
L057 60,000 0.700
L058 60,000 0.700
L059 60,000 0.700
L060 100,000 0.962
L061 100,000 0.962
L062 100,000 0.964
L063 100,000 0.964
L064 100,000 0.964
L065 100,000 0.959
L066 100,000 0.959
L067 60,000 0.700
L068 60,000 0.700
L069 100,000 0.940
L070 100,000 0.940
L071 100,000 0.940
L072 100,000 0.940
L073 100,000 0.940
L074 100,000 0.960
L075 100,000 0.960
L076 100,000 0.960
L077 100,000 0.960
L078 100,000 0.960
L079 100,000 0.960
L080 100,000 0.887
L081 50,000 0.700
L082 50,000 0.700
L083 50,000 0.700
L084 100,000 0.887
L085 100,000 0.887
L086 100,000 0.887
L087 60,000 0.850
L088 60,000 0.850
L089 60,000 0.850
L090 60,000 0.800
Luminaire
ID
Reported
Life
Reported Lumen
Maintenance at
60,000 hr
L091 60,000 0.800
L092 60,000 0.800
L093 100,000 0.900
L094 100,000 0.900
L095 50,000 0.700
L096 50,000 0.700
L097 60,000 0.700
L098 100,000 0.940
L099 60,000 0.700
L100 60,000 0.700
L101 100,000 0.960
L089 60,000 0.850
L103 100,000 0.900
L104 60,000 0.700
L105 60,000 0.700
L106 60,000 0.700
L107 60,000 0.700
L108 60,000 0.700
L109 60,000 0.700
L110 60,000 0.700
L111 60,000 0.700
L112 60,000 0.700
L113 60,000 0.700
L114 200,000 0.954
L115 200,000 0.954
L116 200,000 0.954
L117 200,000 0.954
L118 200,000 0.954
L119 200,000 0.954
L120 200,000 0.954
L121 200,000 0.954
L122 200,000 0.954
L123 200,000 0.954
L124 60,000 0.700
L125 60,000 0.700
L126 60,000 0.700
L127 60,000 0.700
L128 60,000 0.700
L129 100,000 0.960
L130 100,000 0.960
L131 70,000 0.781
L132 60,000 0.970
L133 60,000 0.970
L134 60,000 0.850
L135 60,000 0.850
93,000 0.831Average
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 198
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 121
Table 104: Maintenance Labor Cost
Maintenance Staff
Labor Rate (man-hr)
Duration of Lamp
Replacement (hr)
Total Cost of Labor
Easy Maintenance Access 54.52$ 0.5 27.26$
Moderate Maintenance Access 54.52$ 1.0 54.52$
Difficult Maintenance Access 54.52$ 1.5 81.78$
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 199
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 122
Table 105: Legacy Product Easy Maintenance Access Cost
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 200
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 123
Table 106: Legacy Product Moderate Maintenance Access Cost
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 201
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 124
Table 107: Legacy Product Moderate Difficult Access Cost
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 202
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 125
Table 108: Building Entrances and Exits Legacy Product Maintenance
Area Light
LZ1 LZ2 L Z3 LZ4 Lamp
Wattage
Lamp
Type
Luminaire 15-year
Maintenance
Cost
Maintenance
Access
Luminaire
Lumen
Depreciation
(LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 L Z3 LZ4
0.20 0.10 0.05 0.00 18 CFL E 104 411$ Moderate 0.856 746 37 82$ 41$ 21$ -$
0.25 0.15 0.05 0.05 26 CFL E105 404$ Moderate 0.858 1,077 38 101$ 61$ 20$ 20$
0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 32 CFL E106 234$ Moderate 0.860 1,440 41 59$ 47$ 35$ 23$
0.15 0.25 0.25 0.10 42 CFL E107 235$ Moderate 0.860 1,920 42 35$ 59$ 59$ 24$
0.10 0.15 0.15 0.05 50 PSMH E045 542$ Moderate 0.670 2,257 34 54$ 81$ 81$ 27$
0.05 0.10 0.20 0.10 70 PSMH E046 230$ Moderate 0.740 3,675 40 12$ 23$ 46$ 23$
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.30 100 PSMH E047 337$ Difficult 0.750 5,431 42 -$ 17$ 34$ 101$
0.00 0.00 0.05 0.30 150 PSMH E048 314$ Difficult 0.740 8,037 42 -$ -$ 16$ 94$
1 1 1 1 343$ 328$ 311$ 313$
Wall Mounted Luminaire
LZ1 LZ2 L Z3 LZ4 Lamp
Wattage
Lamp
Type
Luminaire 15-year
Maintenance
Cost
Maintenance
Access
Luminaire
Lumen
Depreciation
(LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 L Z3 LZ4
0.20 0.10 0.05 0.00 26 CFL E020 404$ Moderate 0.858 709 25 81$ 40$ 20$ -$
0.25 0.15 0.05 0.05 26 CFL E020 404$ Moderate 0.858 709 25 101$ 61$ 20$ 20$
0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 32 CFL E021 234$ Moderate 0.860 947 27 59$ 47$ 35$ 23$
0.15 0.25 0.25 0.10 42 CFL E022 235$ Moderate 0.860 1,262 27 35$ 59$ 59$ 24$
0.10 0.15 0.15 0.05 50 PSMH E023 542$ Moderate 0.670 1,225 18 54$ 81$ 81$ 27$
0.05 0.10 0.20 0.10 70 PSMH E024 230$ Moderate 0.740 1,996 22 12$ 23$ 46$ 23$
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.30 100 PSMH E025 337$ Difficult 0.750 2,949 23 -$ 17$ 34$ 101$
0.00 0.00 0.05 0.30 150 PSMH E026 314$ Difficult 0.740 4,364 23 -$ -$ 16$ 94$
1 1 1 1 341$ 328$ 311$ 313$
Weighting Weighted Maintenance
Weighting Weighted Maintenance2008 Basis of Design
2008 Basis of Design
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 203
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 126
Table 109: Primary Entrance Legacy Product Maintenance
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 204
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 127
Table 110: Drive-Up Windows Legacy Product Maintenance
Table 111: Uncovered Fuel Dispenser Legacy Product Maintenance
Round Ceiling Mounted Downlight
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Lamp
Wattage
Lamp
Type
Luminaire 15-year
Maintenance
Cost
Maintenance
Access
Luminaire
Lumen
Depreciation
(LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per
Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.10 0.05 0.00 0.00 50 PSMH E054 542$ Moderate 0.670 1,337 20 54$ 27$ -$ -$
0.20 0.15 0.05 0.10 70 PSMH E055 230$ Moderate 0.740 2,177 24 46$ 35$ 12$ 23$
0.30 0.25 0.20 0.30 100 PSMH E056 337$ Difficult 0.750 3,216 25 101$ 84$ 67$ 101$
0.40 0.55 0.75 0.60 150 PSMH E057 314$ Difficult 0.740 4,759 25 126$ 173$ 236$ 188$
1 1 1 1 327$ 319$ 314$ 313$
Ceiling Mounted, Full Cut-Off
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Lamp
Wattage
Lamp
Type
Luminaire 15-year
Maintenance
Cost
Maintenance
Access
Luminaire
Lumen
Depreciation
(LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per
Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 70 PSMH E035 230$ Moderate 0.740 2,432 26 92$ 92$ 92$ 92$
0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 100 PSMH E036 337$ Difficult 0.750 3,593 28 202$ 202$ 202$ 202$
1 1 1 1 294$ 294$ 294$ 294$
Weighting Weighted Maintenance2008 Basis of Design
Weighting Weighted Maintenance2008 Basis of Design
Area
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Lamp
Wattage
Lamp
Type
Luminaire 15-year
Maintenance
Cost
Maintenance
Access
Luminaire
Lumen
Depreciation
(LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.20 0.10 0.05 0.00 100 PSMH E070 255$ Moderate 0.750 3,876 30 51$ 26$ 13$ -$
0.30 0.20 0.10 0.05 150 PSMH E071 232$ Moderate 0.740 5,737 30 70$ 46$ 23$ 12$
0.30 0.30 0.30 0.25 175 PSMH E037 477$ Moderate 0.700 5,895 30 143$ 143$ 143$ 119$
0.20 0.30 0.35 0.40 250 PSMH E073 358$ Moderate 0.700 9,801 34 72$ 107$ 125$ 143$
0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 400 PSMH E075 219$ Moderate 0.700 17,046 38 -$ 22$ 44$ 66$
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 335$ 344$ 348$ 340$
Weighting Weighted Maintenance2008 Basis of Design
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 205
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 128
Table 112: ATM Machine Lighting Legacy Product Maintenance
Wall Mounted
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Lamp
Wattage
Lamp
Type
Luminaire 15-year
Maintenance
Cost
Maintenance
Access
Luminaire
Lumen
Depreciation
(LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.20 0.20 0.15 0.05 26 CFL E020 231$ Moderate 0.858 709 25 46$ 46$ 35$ 12$
0.25 0.25 0.25 0.15 32 CFL E021 117$ Moderate 0.860 947 27 29$ 29$ 29$ 18$
0.25 0.20 0.10 0.10 100 PSMH E025 170$ Moderate 0.750 2949 23 43$ 34$ 17$ 17$
0.20 0.20 0.25 0.30 150 PSMH E026 155$ Moderate 0.740 4364 23 31$ 31$ 39$ 46$
0.10 0.10 0.15 0.25 175 PSMH E042 286$ Moderate 0.700 4721 24 29$ 29$ 43$ 72$
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 250 PSMH E043 215$ Moderate 0.700 6787 23 -$ 11$ 21$ 32$
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 177$ 180$ 184$ 196$
Weighting Weighted Maintenance2008 Basis of Design
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 206
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 129
Table 113: Outdoor Sales Frontage Legacy Product Maintenance
Area
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Lamp
Wattage
Lamp
Type
Luminaire 15-year
Maintenance
Cost
Maintenance
Access
Luminaire
Lumen
Depreciation
(LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.10 0.05 0.00 0.00 100 PSMH E070 337$ Difficult 0.750 3,876 30 34$ 17$ -$ -$
0.20 0.10 0.00 0.00 150 PSMH E071 314$ Difficult 0.740 5,737 30 63$ 31$ -$ -$
0.25 0.20 0.10 0.00 175 PSMH E037 614$ Difficult 0.700 5,895 30 154$ 123$ 61$ -$
0.20 0.25 0.20 0.10 250 PSMH E073 495$ Difficult 0.700 9,801 34 99$ 124$ 99$ 50$
0.15 0.20 0.20 0.15 320 PSMH E074 324$ Difficult 0.700 12,571 34 49$ 65$ 65$ 49$
0.10 0.15 0.25 0.20 400 PSMH E075 301$ Difficult 0.700 17,046 38 30$ 45$ 75$ 60$
0.00 0.05 0.15 0.25 750 PSMH E076 560$ Difficult 0.700 32,399 40 -$ 28$ 84$ 140$
0.00 0.00 0.10 0.30 1000 PSMH E077 552$ Difficult 0.701 49,590 46 -$ -$ 55$ 166$
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 428$ 433$ 440$ 464$
Flood
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Lamp
Wattage
Lamp
Type
Luminaire 15-year
Maintenance
Cost
Maintenance
Access
Luminaire
Lumen
Depreciation
(LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.10 0.05 0.00 0.00 100 PSMH E126 337$ Difficult 0.750 5,315 41 34$ 17$ -$ -$
0.20 0.10 0.00 0.00 150 PSMH E127 314$ Difficult 0.740 7,728 41 63$ 31$ -$ -$
0.25 0.20 0.10 0.00 175 PSMH E078 614$ Difficult 0.700 8,053 41 154$ 123$ 61$ -$
0.20 0.25 0.20 0.10 250 PSMH E128 495$ Difficult 0.700 12,275 42 99$ 124$ 99$ 50$
0.15 0.20 0.20 0.15 320 PSMH E079 324$ Difficult 0.700 14,847 40 49$ 65$ 65$ 49$
0.10 0.20 0.30 0.30 400 PSMH E129 301$ Difficult 0.700 19,640 43 30$ 60$ 90$ 90$
0.00 0.00 0.20 0.45 1000 PSMH E130 552$ Difficult 0.701 42,582 39 -$ -$ 110$ 248$
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 428$ 420$ 426$ 437$
Weighting Weighted Maintenance2008 Basis of Design
Weighting Weighted Maintenance2008 Basis of Design
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 207
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 130
Table 114: Hardscape Ornamental Lighting Legacy Product Maintenance
Decorative Area
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Lamp
Wattage
Lamp
Type
Luminaire 15-year
Maintenance
Cost
Maintenance
Access
Luminaire
Lumen
Depreciation
(LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.25 0.15 0.10 0.05 50 PSMH E132 542$ Moderate 0.670 584 9 136$ 81$ 54$ 27$
0.20 0.25 0.20 0.20 70 PSMH E133 230$ Moderate 0.740 928 10 46$ 58$ 46$ 46$
0.15 0.20 0.30 0.25 100 PSMH E134 255$ Moderate 0.750 1256 10 38$ 51$ 77$ 64$
0.05 0.05 0.15 0.30 150 PSMH E135 232$ Moderate 0.740 1652 9 12$ 12$ 35$ 70$
0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 42 CFL E099 235$ Moderate 0.860 1237 27 47$ 35$ 24$ 12$
0.15 0.20 0.15 0.15 57 CFL E100 235$ Moderate 0.860 1662 27 35$ 47$ 35$ 35$
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 314$ 284$ 270$ 253$
Weighting Weighted Maintenance2008 Basis of Design
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 208
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 131
Table 115: Building Facades Legacy Product Maintenance
Wall Mounted Full Cutoff
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Lamp
Wattage
Lamp
Type
Luminaire 15-year
Maintenance
Cost
Maintenance
Access
Luminaire
Lumen
Depreciation
(LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per
Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.10 0.10 0.05 0.05 26 CFL E012 231$ Moderate 0.858 927 33 23$ 23$ 12$ 12$
0.15 0.10 0.10 0.05 32 CFL E013 117$ Moderate 0.860 1,238 35 18$ 12$ 12$ 6$
0.30 0.25 0.20 0.10 42 CFL E014 117$ Moderate 0.860 1,651 36 35$ 29$ 23$ 12$
0.15 0.20 0.10 0.20 50 PSMH E023 310$ Moderate 0.670 1,225 18 47$ 62$ 31$ 62$
0.15 0.20 0.15 0.10 70 PSMH E001 153$ Moderate 0.740 3,253 35 23$ 31$ 23$ 15$
0.10 0.05 0.20 0.20 100 PSMH E025 170$ Moderate 0.750 2,949 23 17$ 9$ 34$ 34$
0.05 0.05 0.15 0.20 150 PSMH E026 115$ Moderate 0.740 4,364 23 6$ 6$ 17$ 23$
0.00 0.05 0.05 0.10 250 PSMH E042 215$ Moderate 0.700 4,721 16 -$ 11$ 11$ 22$
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 168$ 182$ 163$ 185$
Ground Mounted Floodlight
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Lamp
Wattage
Lamp
Type
Luminaire 15-year
Maintenance
Cost
Maintenance
Access
Luminaire
Lumen
Depreciation
(LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per
Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
1.00 0.45 0.25 0.25 100 PSMH E038 116$ Easy 0.750 4,424 34 116$ 52$ 29$ 29$
0.00 0.45 0.50 0.35 175 PSMH E039 205$ Easy 0.700 7,680 39 -$ 92$ 103$ 72$
0.00 0.10 0.25 0.40 250 PSMH E040 133$ Easy 0.700 10,081 35 -$ 13$ 33$ 53$
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 116$ 158$ 165$ 154$
Cylindrical
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Lamp
Wattage
Lamp
Type
Luminaire 15-year
Maintenance
Cost
Maintenance
Access
Luminaire
Lumen
Depreciation
(LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per
Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.30 0.15 0.05 0.00 50 MR16 E002 393$ Moderate 0.900 752 15 118$ 59$ 20$ -$
0.30 0.15 0.10 0.05 75 MR16 E003 425$ Moderate 0.900 1,062 14 128$ 64$ 43$ 21$
0.15 0.30 0.25 0.10 50 PSMH E034 310$ Moderate 0.670 1,493 22 47$ 93$ 78$ 31$
0.15 0.25 0.35 0.25 70 PSMH E035 153$ Moderate 0.740 2,432 26 23$ 38$ 54$ 38$
0.10 0.15 0.25 0.60 100 PSMH E036 170$ Moderate 0.750 3,593 28 17$ 26$ 43$ 102$
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 332$ 279$ 236$ 193$
Weighting Weighted Maintenance2008 Basis of Design
Weighting Weighted Maintenance2008 Basis of Design
Weighting Weighted Maintenance2008 Basis of Design
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 209
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 132
Table 116: Outdoor Sales Lots Legacy Product Maintenance
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 210
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 133
Table 117: Vehicle Service Station Hardscapes Legacy Product Maintenance
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 211
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 134
Table 118: Vehicle Service Station-Canopies Legacy Product Maintenance
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 212
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 135
Table 119: Sales Canopies Legacy Product Maintenance
Downlight
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Lamp
Wattage
Lamp
Type
Luminaire 15-year
Maintenance
Cost
Maintenance
Access
Luminaire
Lumen
Depreciation
(LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 13 CFL E004 235$ Moderate 0.855 476 30 12$ -$ -$ -$
0.05 0.05 0.00 0.00 18 CFL E005 235$ Moderate 0.856 693 35 12$ 12$ -$ -$
0.05 0.05 0.05 0.00 26 CFL E027 231$ Moderate 0.858 696 25 12$ 12$ 12$ -$
0.10 0.05 0.05 0.05 32 CFL E028 117$ Moderate 0.860 930 27 12$ 6$ 6$ 6$
0.10 0.10 0.05 0.05 42 CFL E029 117$ Moderate 0.860 1,240 27 12$ 12$ 6$ 6$
0.15 0.10 0.10 0.10 (2) 32 CFL E051 234$ Moderate 0.860 1,876 28 35$ 23$ 23$ 23$
0.15 0.10 0.10 0.10 (2) 42 CFL E052 234$ Moderate 0.860 2,276 24 35$ 23$ 23$ 23$
0.05 0.05 0.05 0.10 (2) 57 CFL E053 344$ Difficult 0.860 2,800 22 17$ 17$ 17$ 34$
0.15 0.05 0.05 0.05 50 PSMH E054 310$ Moderate 0.670 1,337 20 47$ 16$ 16$ 16$
0.10 0.15 0.15 0.05 70 PSMH E055 153$ Moderate 0.740 2,177 24 15$ 23$ 23$ 8$
0.05 0.15 0.15 0.10 100 PSMH E056 170$ Moderate 0.750 3,216 25 9$ 26$ 26$ 17$
0.00 0.10 0.10 0.15 150 PSMH E057 209$ Difficult 0.740 4,759 25 -$ 21$ 21$ 31$
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 175 PSMH E058 368$ Difficult 0.700 5,584 28 -$ 18$ 37$ 55$
0.00 0.00 0.05 0.10 250 PSMH E059 297$ Difficult 0.700 8,028 28 -$ -$ 15$ 30$
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 216$ 208$ 224$ 249$
Recessed Linear Fluorescent
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Lamp
Wattage
Lamp
Type
Luminaire 15-year
Maintenance
Cost
Maintenance
Access
Luminaire
Lumen
Depreciation
(LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.10 0.10 0.05 0.05 25 T8 E119 27$ Moderate 0.921 1,640 63 3$ 3$ 1$ 1$
0.15 0.10 0.05 0.05 32 T8 E121 28$ Moderate 0.949 2,240 68 4$ 3$ 1$ 1$
0.15 0.10 0.15 0.10 (2) 32 T8 E118 56$ Moderate 0.949 3,092 47 8$ 6$ 8$ 6$
0.10 0.10 0.10 0.05 21 T5 E120 59$ Moderate 0.952 2,210 88 6$ 6$ 6$ 3$
0.15 0.10 0.10 0.05 28 T5 E114 58$ Moderate 0.948 2,006 65 9$ 6$ 6$ 3$
0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 (2) 21 T5 E123 118$ Moderate 0.952 2,677 54 12$ 12$ 12$ 12$
0.15 0.10 0.15 0.15 (2) 28 T5 E117 116$ Moderate 0.948 3,642 59 17$ 12$ 17$ 17$
0.05 0.10 0.15 0.15 54 T5HO E122 57$ Moderate 0.950 3,800 61 3$ 6$ 9$ 9$
0.05 0.10 0.10 0.15 (2) 39 T5HO E124 118$ Moderate 0.950 4,452 54 6$ 12$ 12$ 18$
0.00 0.10 0.05 0.15 (2) 54 T5HO E125 114$ Moderate 0.950 7,600 61 -$ 11$ 6$ 17$
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 68$ 75$ 78$ 87$
Weighting Weighted Maintenance2008 Basis of Design
Weighting Weighted Maintenance2008 Basis of Design
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 213
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 136
Table 120: Non-Sales Canopies and Pedestrian Tunnels Legacy Product Maintenance
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 214
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 137
Table 121: Guard Station Legacy Product Maintenance
Wall Pack
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Lamp
Wattage
Lamp
Type
Luminaire 15-year
Maintenance
Cost
Maintenance
Access
Luminaire
Lumen
Depreciation
(LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.20 0.10 0.05 0.05 26 CFL E020 404$ Moderate 0.858 709 25 81$ 40$ 20$ 20$
0.25 0.15 0.05 0.05 32 CFL E021 234$ Moderate 0.860 947 27 58$ 35$ 12$ 12$
0.25 0.20 0.10 0.05 42 CFL E022 235$ Moderate 0.860 1,262 27 59$ 47$ 23$ 12$
0.15 0.25 0.25 0.15 70 PSMH E024 230$ Moderate 0.740 1,996 22 34$ 57$ 57$ 34$
0.10 0.15 0.25 0.20 100 PSMH E025 337$ Difficult 0.750 2,949 23 34$ 51$ 84$ 67$
0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 150 PSMH E026 314$ Difficult 0.740 4,364 23 16$ 31$ 47$ 63$
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.20 175 PSMH E042 614$ Difficult 0.700 4,721 24 -$ 31$ 61$ 123$
0.00 0.00 0.05 0.10 250 PSMH E043 495$ Difficult 0.700 6,787 23 -$ -$ 25$ 49$
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 282$ 292$ 330$ 380$
Area
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Lamp
Wattage
Lamp
Type
Luminaire 15-year
Maintenance
Cost
Maintenance
Access
Luminaire
Lumen
Depreciation
(LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.05 0.05 0.00 0.00 18 CFL E104 411$ Moderate 0.856 746 37 21$ 21$ -$ -$
0.20 0.10 0.05 0.05 26 CFL E105 404$ Moderate 0.858 1,077 38 81$ 40$ 20$ 20$
0.20 0.15 0.05 0.05 32 CFL E106 234$ Moderate 0.860 1,440 41 47$ 35$ 12$ 12$
0.25 0.20 0.10 0.05 42 CFL E107 235$ Moderate 0.860 1,920 42 59$ 47$ 23$ 12$
0.15 0.20 0.25 0.15 70 PSMH E069 311$ Difficult 0.740 2,623 29 47$ 62$ 78$ 47$
0.10 0.15 0.25 0.20 100 PSMH E070 337$ Difficult 0.750 3,876 30 34$ 51$ 84$ 67$
0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 150 PSMH E071 314$ Difficult 0.740 5,737 30 16$ 31$ 47$ 63$
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.20 175 PSMH E037 614$ Difficult 0.700 5,895 30 -$ 31$ 61$ 123$
0.00 0.00 0.05 0.10 250 PSMH E073 495$ Difficult 0.700 9,801 34 -$ -$ 25$ 49$
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 303$ 318$ 351$ 393$
Floodlight
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Lamp
Wattage
Lamp
Type
Luminaire 15-year
Maintenance
Cost
Maintenance
Access
Luminaire
Lumen
Depreciation
(LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.40 0.35 0.20 0.20 100 PSMH E126 337$ Difficult 0.750 5,315 41 135$ 118$ 67$ 67$
0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 150 PSMH E127 314$ Difficult 0.740 7,728 41 79$ 79$ 79$ 79$
0.20 0.20 0.30 0.25 175 PSMH E078 614$ Difficult 0.700 8,053 41 123$ 123$ 184$ 153$
0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 250 PSMH E016 495$ Difficult 0.700 9,660 33 74$ 99$ 124$ 148$
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 410$ 418$ 454$ 448$
Weighting Weighted Maintenance2008 Basis of Design
Weighting Weighted Maintenance2008 Basis of Design
Weighting Weighted Maintenance2008 Basis of Design
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 215
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 138
Table 122: Student Pick Up Legacy Product Maintenance
Downlight
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Lamp
Wattage
Lamp
Type
Luminaire 15-year
Maintenance
Cost
Maintenance
Access
Luminaire
Lumen
Depreciation
(LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.10 0.10 0.05 0.00 32 CFL E095 58$ Moderate 0.860 940 27 6$ 6$ 3$ -$
0.25 0.10 0.05 0.05 42 CFL E096 59$ Moderate 0.860 1,254 27 15$ 6$ 3$ 3$
0.25 0.20 0.20 0.10 70 PSMH E097 77$ Moderate 0.740 1,895 21 19$ 15$ 15$ 8$
0.15 0.20 0.20 0.25 100 PSMH E098 112$ Difficult 0.750 2,801 22 17$ 22$ 22$ 28$
0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 150 PSMH E057 105$ Difficult 0.740 4,759 25 16$ 21$ 26$ 31$
0.10 0.20 0.25 0.30 175 PSMH E058 123$ Difficult 0.700 5,584 28 12$ 25$ 31$ 37$
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 84$ 95$ 100$ 107$
Wall Pack
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Lamp
Wattage
Lamp
Type
Luminaire 15-year
Maintenance
Cost
Maintenance
Access
Luminaire
Lumen
Depreciation
(LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.10 0.10 0.05 0.00 26 CFL E020 115$ Moderate 0.858 709 25 12$ 12$ 6$ -$
0.15 0.10 0.10 0.05 32 CFL E021 58$ Moderate 0.860 947 27 9$ 6$ 6$ 3$
0.20 0.15 0.10 0.10 42 CFL E022 59$ Moderate 0.860 1,262 27 12$ 9$ 6$ 6$
0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 70 PSMH E024 77$ Moderate 0.740 1,996 22 19$ 15$ 11$ 8$
0.15 0.25 0.15 0.15 100 PSMH E025 112$ Difficult 0.750 2,949 23 17$ 28$ 17$ 17$
0.10 0.15 0.25 0.20 150 PSMH E026 105$ Difficult 0.740 4,364 23 10$ 16$ 26$ 21$
0.05 0.05 0.15 0.25 175 PSMH E042 123$ Difficult 0.700 4,721 24 6$ 6$ 18$ 31$
0.00 0.00 0.05 0.15 250 PSMH E043 99$ Difficult 0.700 6,787 23 -$ -$ 5$ 15$
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 85$ 91$ 95$ 100$
Area
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4 Lamp
Wattage
Lamp
Type
Luminaire 15-year
Maintenance
Cost
Maintenance
Access
Luminaire
Lumen
Depreciation
(LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 LZ4
0.05 0.05 0.00 0.00 18 CFL E104 117$ Moderate 0.856 746 37 6$ 6$ -$ -$
0.05 0.05 0.05 0.00 26 CFL E105 115$ Moderate 0.858 1,077 38 6$ 6$ 6$ -$
0.10 0.10 0.10 0.05 32 CFL E106 58$ Moderate 0.860 1,440 41 6$ 6$ 6$ 3$
0.20 0.15 0.20 0.10 42 CFL E107 59$ Moderate 0.860 1,920 42 12$ 9$ 12$ 6$
0.30 0.20 0.20 0.15 50 PSMH E045 209$ Difficult 0.670 2,257 34 63$ 42$ 42$ 31$
0.20 0.20 0.20 0.25 70 PSMH E046 104$ Difficult 0.740 3,675 40 21$ 21$ 21$ 26$
0.05 0.15 0.15 0.25 100 PSMH E047 112$ Difficult 0.750 5,431 42 6$ 17$ 17$ 28$
0.05 0.10 0.10 0.20 150 PSMH E048 105$ Difficult 0.740 8,037 42 5$ 10$ 10$ 21$
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 124$ 116$ 113$ 115$
2008 Basis of Design
2008 Basis of Design
2008 Basis of Design
Weighting Weighted Maintenance
Weighting Weighted Maintenance
Weighting Weighted Maintenance
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 216
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 139
Table 123: Outdoor Dining Legacy Product Maintenance
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 217
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 140
Table 124: Special Security for Retail and Pedestrian Hardscape Legacy Product Maintenance
Wall Pack
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 L Z4 Lamp
Wattage
Lamp
Type
Luminaire 15-year
Maintenance
Cost
Maintenance
Access
Luminaire
Lumen
Depreciation
(LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 L Z4
0.25 0.15 0.10 0.10 26 CFL E020 404$ Moderate 0.858 709 25 101$ 61$ 40$ 40$
0.25 0.25 0.15 0.15 32 CFL E021 234$ Moderate 0.860 947 27 58$ 58$ 35$ 35$
0.25 0.25 0.20 0.15 42 CFL E022 235$ Moderate 0.860 1,262 27 59$ 59$ 47$ 35$
0.10 0.15 0.15 0.10 70 PSMH E024 311$ Difficult 0.740 1,996 22 31$ 47$ 47$ 31$
0.10 0.10 0.20 0.15 100 PSMH E025 337$ Difficult 0.750 2,949 23 34$ 34$ 67$ 51$
0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 150 PSMH E026 314$ Difficult 0.740 4,364 23 16$ 31$ 47$ 63$
0.00 0.00 0.05 0.10 175 PSMH E042 614$ Difficult 0.700 4,721 24 -$ -$ 31$ 61$
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 250 PSMH E043 495$ Difficult 0.700 6,787 23 -$ -$ -$ 25$
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 298$ 289$ 314$ 341$
Area
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 L Z4 Lamp
Wattage
Lamp
Type
Luminaire 15-year
Maintenance
Cost
Maintenance
Access
Luminaire
Lumen
Depreciation
(LLD)
Maintained
Luminaire
Lumens
Lumens
per Watt
(LPW)
LZ1 LZ2 LZ3 L Z4
0.10 0.10 0.05 0.00 18 CFL E104 411$ Moderate 0.856 746 37 41$ 41$ 21$ -$
0.25 0.15 0.10 0.10 26 CFL E105 404$ Moderate 0.858 1,077 38 101$ 61$ 40$ 40$
0.20 0.20 0.15 0.15 32 CFL E106 234$ Moderate 0.860 1,440 41 47$ 47$ 35$ 35$
0.20 0.25 0.15 0.15 42 CFL E107 235$ Moderate 0.860 1,920 42 47$ 59$ 35$ 35$
0.10 0.15 0.15 0.10 70 PSMH E069 311$ Difficult 0.740 2,623 29 31$ 47$ 47$ 31$
0.10 0.10 0.20 0.15 100 PSMH E070 337$ Difficult 0.750 3,876 30 34$ 34$ 67$ 51$
0.05 0.05 0.15 0.20 150 PSMH E071 314$ Difficult 0.740 5,737 30 16$ 16$ 47$ 63$
0.00 0.00 0.05 0.10 175 PSMH E037 614$ Difficult 0.700 5,895 30 -$ -$ 31$ 61$
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 250 PSMH E073 495$ Difficult 0.700 9,801 34 -$ -$ -$ 25$
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 316$ 303$ 323$ 341$
2008 Basis of Design
Weighting Weighted Maintenance
Weighting Weighted Maintenance
2008 Basis of Design
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 218
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 141
Appendix G: N ARROW B AND LED L UMINAIRE
E FFICACY C OMPARISON
Table 125 provides a comparison of various 3000K white light LED luminaires with the equivalent
narrow band spectrum LED luminaire as offered by each manufacturer. Each of the narrow band
spectrum sources were shown to meet the appropriate CALGreen requirements.
Table 125: Narrow Band LED Luminaires Comparison
Type 3000K White Light Luminaire Narrow Band LED luminaire
ID Lumens Lm/W ID Lumens Lm/W BUG Rating
Area W01 3863 84 A01 3090 67 not documented
Area W02 6197 84 A02 4958 67 not documented
Area W07 9375 105 A07 1491 16 B0-U0-G1
Area W08 7354 107 A08 1177 17 B0-U0-G0
Area W09 5330 99 A09 853 16 B0-U0-G0
Area W10 6178 110 A10 1533 51 B1-U0-G0
Area W11 6178 110 A11 2276 57 B1-U0-G1
Area W12 6178 110 A12 3452 66 B1-U0-G1
Area W23 3777 59 A23 3081 32 not documented
Area W24 2833 59 A24 1541 32 not documented
Area W25 5240 79 A25 5312 33 not documented
Bollard W03 888 44 A03 374 19 B0-U0-G1
Bollard W05 729 48 A05 656 44 B0-U0-G1
Bollard W13 1083 70 A13 239 21 B0-U0-G0
Ingrade W19 155 52 A19 73 24 not documented
Linear W20 149 50 A20 144 48 not documented
Pathway (Puck) W21 14 14 A21 14 14 B0-U1-G0
Tape W15 64 25 A15 37 14 B0-U1-G0
Tape W16 380 32 A16 64 8 not documented
Tape W17 490 43 A17 174 22 not documented
Wall W22 840 93 A22 299 43 not documented
The average difference in efficacies of warm white light LED luminaires and narrow band LED
luminaires was determined in Table 126. The total efficacy ratio was used to determine an appropriate
LPA multiplier for use when narrow band spectrum luminaires are required.
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 219
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 142
Table 126: Average Efficacies of White Light Luminaires Compared to Narrow Band LED
Luminaires
Average 3000K
Efficacy (lm/W)
Average Narrow Band
Efficacy (lm/W)
3000K: Narrow Band
Efficacy
Area Light 92 41 222%
Area Light1 Excluding Luminaires 09-11 87 51 171%
Bollard 54 28 196%
Ingrade 52 24 212%
Linear 50 48 103%
Pathway (puck light) 14 14 100%
Wall Mounted 93 43 219%
Tape Light 33 15 225%
Total 49 29 182%
1Area Light Excluding Luminaires 09-11 is shown for reference only. This value is not considered in the total
3000K: Narrow Band Efficacy.
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 220
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 143
Appendix H: G ENERAL H ARDSCAPE S TATEWIDE
S AVINGS A SSUMPTIONS
The following is an excerpt from the 2016 Nonresidential Outdoor Lighting Power Allowance CASE
Study that explains how the assumptions were developed to translate indoor construction forecasts to
General Hardscape.
-----Start of Excerpt-----
Since the outdoor hardscape is not estimated as part of the construction forecasts, statewide impacts
must be completed by making proxies with reasonable estimates of the relationship of the line item to
the potential gross square footage of indoor spaces associated with the measure.
In effect, the estimates relate the unit of the measure (square foot of hardscape), with an equivalent unit
of gross interior space, which can then be projected using the construction forecasts. Most measure line
items only apply to certain building types (retail or small office, for example), and this is taken into
account as well.
The process to develop the relationship of General Hardscape square footage to building gross square
footage for statewide construction estimates is as follows:
1. Establish the square footage of a parking space (which will be the basic unit of comparison
because of the code use of minimum spaces per square foot).
2. Determine any modifications to the basic unit required for specific building types to
accommodate specific design requirements. This is primarily to adjust for warehouse buildings.
3. Determine the basic parking requirements for the listed building types in the construction
forecasts.
4. Create a table of adjustment factors to apply to the respective building types, normalizing the
value back to a single square footage unit to make the calculations work in a direct manner.
Step #1: Establish ‘per space’ Square Footage
The Statewide CASE Team first established the approximate square footage of hardscape associated
with a single parking space, using the following assumptions that are based on general design
documents and traditional design standards:
• Each parking space is approximately 144 square feet (8 feet by 18 feet).
• There is a drive lane to gain access to the space, and the minimum amount is one-half of the
drive lane directly in front of the parking space. This adds 80 square feet (8 feet by 10 feet).
• The parking is only ‘funded’ to 75 percent on-site. This reduces the vehicle hardscape from 224
square feet to 168 square feet. There are many reasons this may occur, including trade-offs with
mass transit, on-street parking, garage space parking, etc. Many municipalities permit trades of
this kind. The actual amount is unclear, so this adjustment is an estimate based on reasonable
expectations.
• There is vehicular hardscape that is not specifically associated with the parking lot. This adds 40
square feet per space. This constitutes all of the hardscape on a site that is oriented to vehicles,
but not specifically included in the parking space requirements that the municipalities are
establishing, including loading docks, access drives, pick-up and drop-off zones, etc. However,
warehouse buildings have a large requirement for loading dock and access hardscape that is
underrepresented in this without increasing this value to 1,800 square feet.
• There is hardscape that is not vehicle oriented that must be included. This constitutes all the rest
of the hardscape on a site, and includes sidewalks required to gain access to the building. The
non-vehicular hardscape adds 40 square feet to the hardscape per space.
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 221
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 144
This results in a net of 250 square feet of hardscape per parking space for the basic Parking Space unit.
Step #2: Modifications for Specific Building Types
The majority of building types in the construction forecasts can use the 250 square feet per space
estimate. However, warehouses are an exception to this and need adjustment to these values.
• Parking space - 144 square feet.
• Drive lane - 80 square feet.
• The parking is only ‘funded’ to 75 percent on-site - 168 square feet.
• Other vehicular hardscape - Warehouse buildings have a large requirement for loading dock and
access hardscape that is underrepresented without using a much higher hardscape value because
the number of people in the buildings is low relative to the size of the building and the large
vehicles on the site. Based on reasonable estimates, this addition should be 390 square feet.
• Non-vehicular hardscape - 40 square feet.
This results in a net of 600 square feet of hardscape per parking space for warehouses. This will be
applied as an adjustment multiplier in step #4.
Step #3: Determine General Parking Requirements
The general hardscape square footage values are based on the requirements for parking spaces in
various building development codes. These vary depending on the building density and location; how
urban or suburban the region is. The parking space requirements also vary depending on the use of the
building, and other variables. Figure 38 provides information from three metropolitan areas that show
the range of minimum parking space accommodation requirements in the local building standards
(NRC2013), (MTC2012), (LADBS2013).
Figure 13: Parking Space Requirements for Various Metropolitan Regions
Using reasonable estimates from the wide range of parking space requirements, the minimums were
translated into reasonable single values for individual building types that match the construction
estimate forecasts. These values are shown in Figure 14.
Metro Region Office Retail Restaurant Mixed Use Warehouse Hotel Industrial School College
Los Angeles Area1.500sf 250sf 100sf -
500sf up to
10,000sf,
5,000sf after
500sf Classroom
(elementary)
5 seats
(classroom)
San Diego Area2.250sf to
330sf
200sf to
1,000sf
70sf to
1,000sf -1,000sf
Each hotel
room, and
Per 100sf
convention
space
400sf to
650sf
.5 Classroom
(elementary),
5 students
(high school)
-
Bay Area Metro Region3.200sf to
400sf
200sf to
500sf -500sf to
1,000sf 1,000sf - ---
1. Los Angeles City Department of Bulding and Safety, 2013. P/ZC 2002-011.
2. Dan Diego Municipal Code, 2009. Chapter 4: General Regulations.
3. Survey of Bay Area Cities' Parking Requirements: Summary Report. Includes cities in Alameda, Contra Costa, Napa,
San Mateo, Santa Clara, Solano, and Sonoma counties.
Parking Space Minimums (One space Per...)
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 222
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 145
Figure 14: Representative Code Parking Space Requirements Employed
These values were grouped into three basic groups; 250ft2, 360ft2, and 2,000ft2. These will also be
applied as adjustment multiplier in step #4.
Step #4: Create a Table of Adjustment Factors.
The best method to apply general hardscape to each building type is to determine a single unit of
adjustment and apply that unit to the construction square footage uniformly if possible.
In this case, the unit selected is a single Parking Space, which represents 250 square feet of hardscape,
as was determined in Step #1.
However, since some building types require more square footage per space, and the various buildings
have different densities for the spaces, a table must be developed to adjust this unit for the specifics of
the individual building types.
Figure 15 below provides this table and represents the process for making the adjustments to the
influence factors that are applied in the statewide impacts calculations.
Figure 15: Parking Space Area Multipliers Applied in Statewide Calculations
As a result, the energy savings in the first row of building types are applied at the rate of 250 square feet
of hardscape for each 250 square feet of gross building area. The second row of building types savings
are applied at the rate of 250 square feet of hardscape to 360 square feet of gross building area.
Warehouse savings are applied at the rate of 250 square feet for every 830 square feet of warehouse
gross area, which is equivalent to 600 square feet of hardscape in 2,000 square feet for warehouse.
Office, LG &
SM Retail Restaurant
Food
(Grocery)
Warehouse,
Ref & NR Hotel School College Other
Value Employed 250sf 360sf 250sf 250sf 2,000sf 360sf 360sf 250sf 360sf
Representative Code-Collected Parking Minimums (One space per)
S. F. Per Space
Required Adjustment Per Space
Min. Required Adjustment
Parking Space for Office,
Grocery, Restaurant, College
Building Types
250sf ------250sf 1 250sf 1
Parking Space for Retail,
Hotel, School, Other
Building Types
250sf -------360sf 0.7 360sf 0.7
Parking Space for
Warehouse, REF & NR 250sf 600sf 2.4 2,000sf 0.125 830sf 0.3
Area Multipliers to Apply to Building Types (Using 250sf as Basic Unit)
Adjustment for Site
Differences
Adjustment for Code
Requirement Differences
Final Value
Converted Into
"Basic (250sf)
Parking Units"
Basic Parking
Unit
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 223
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 146
Appendix I: S PECIFIC A PPLICATIONS S TATEWIDE
S AVINGS A SSUMPTIONS
The majority of the statewide savings assumptions for Table 140.7-B Specific Applications were taken
from the 2016 Nonresidential Outdoor Lighting Power Allowance CASE Report. However, the
Statewide CASE Team performed additional analyses to refine some of the assumptions. Specifically,
the Statewide CASE Team examined Building Facades, Outdoor Sales Lots, Outdoor Sales Frontage,
Vehicle Service Station Canopies, and Vehicle Service Station Hardscape.
Building Façade
The Statewide CASE Team calculated new statewide savings after refining the assumptions for
Building Façades. The following equation was developed and used to determine the illuminated façade
wall area to floor ratio: 𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤ℎ𝑡𝑡𝑤𝑤𝑡𝑡 𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤 𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡 𝑓𝑓𝑤𝑤𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑓𝑓 𝑓𝑓𝑤𝑤𝑡𝑡𝑤𝑤𝑡𝑡 (%)∗𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑤𝑤𝑓𝑓𝑡𝑡𝑤𝑤𝑡𝑡𝑓𝑓 𝑡𝑡𝑓𝑓 𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑡𝑡𝑤𝑤𝑓𝑓𝑤𝑤𝑏𝑏 𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑡𝑡∗𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑤𝑤𝑓𝑓𝑡𝑡𝑤𝑤𝑡𝑡𝑓𝑓 𝑡𝑡𝑓𝑓 𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑏𝑏 𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑡𝑡=𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑏𝑏𝑖𝑖𝑤𝑤𝑓𝑓𝑤𝑤𝑡𝑡𝑤𝑤𝑡𝑡 𝑓𝑓𝑤𝑤𝑓𝑓𝑤𝑤𝑡𝑡𝑤𝑤 𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤 𝑤𝑤𝑓𝑓𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤 𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡 𝑓𝑓𝑤𝑤𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑓𝑓 𝑓𝑓𝑤𝑤𝑡𝑡𝑤𝑤𝑡𝑡
The Statewide CASE Team used 2016 Census floorspace data from the Commercial Buildings Energy
Consumption Survey (CBECS) to determine the weighted wall to floor ratio. This analysis was
completed by examining the number buildings (split into categories of square footage and number of
floors) and total floorspace (also split by square footage and number of floors). The total floorspace was
divided by the total number of buildings and average number of floors to create an average floorspace
per floor (for each category of square footage and number of floors). A floor height (assumed average of
12 feet) was multiplied by a 2-to-1 floor to wall aspect ratio and divided by the square root of the
average floorspace per floor (also multiplied by the 2-to-1 floor to wall aspect ratio) to give the wall
area to floor ratio (by square footage and number of floors). Each of the wall area to floor ratios was
then weighted by total floorspace and summed to produce the weighted wall to floor ratio.
The fraction of buildings lit assumption is based on a lighting project and observations at the University
of California, Berkeley campus; the assumption is that approximately eight percent of buildings have
façade lighting.
The fraction of walls lit is an assumption on the percent of building walls (on one building) that are lit
based on the experience of lighting designers. The Statewide CASE Team assumed that 37.5 percent of
building walls (on one building) are lit; this translates to roughly one to two sides of a building is
generally lit.
All three of these variables are combined to produce the illuminated façade wall area to floor ratio of
1.22 percent; i.e. for every 100 square feet newly constructed indoor space, there is approximately 1.22
square feet of building façade space constructed. The statewide savings assumptions were adjusted to
match this ratio. See Table 37 for the updated assumptions.
Outdoor Sales Lots and Outdoor Sales Frontage
The Statewide CASE Team modeled a medium and large sized auto dealership lot to help refine and
verify assumptions for the statewide savings estimates for Outdoor Sales Lots and Outdoor Sales
Frontage. For the analysis, the Statewide CASE Team selected Lighting Zone 3 with high activity levels
per IES 10th Edition Handbook (Table 34.2). The Statewide CASE Team assumed a lumen maintenance
of 90 percent at 60,000 hours for luminaires that would meet the proposed 2019 LPAs and CALGreen
requirements. A 90 percent dirt depreciation factor was also applied to the luminaires to achieve a total
light loss factor of 0.81. The results showed that Outdoor Sales Frontage for the medium sized auto
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 224
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 147
dealership accounted for approximately 90 percent of the installed wattage while Outdoor Sales Lots
only accounted for roughly 10 percent of installed wattage. Similarly, the results of the large sized auto
dealership showed that despite Outdoor Sales Frontage only accounting for roughly six percent of the
total area, it still contained approximately 65 percent of the installed wattage. See Figure 16 and Figure
17 for diagrams of the medium and large sized auto dealerships.
The Statewide CASE Team adjusted the assumptions to achieve the following results: Outdoor Sales
Frontage accounts for approximately ten percent of Outdoor Sales Lots area and roughly 61 percent of
the energy savings. See Table 37 for the updated assumptions.
Table 127: Modeled Auto Dealership Lots for Sales Lots and Sales Frontage
Medium Sized
Auto Dealership
Large Sized Auto
Dealership
Sales Lot Area (square feet) 37,000 195,700
Sales Lot Perimeter (feet) 985 1,817
Sales Lot Wattage (watts) 488 4,410
Sales Frontage Area (square feet) 6,600 11,440
Sales Frontage Perimeter (feet) 819 1,354
Sales Frontage Wattage (watts) 4,434 8,132
Ratio of Frontage to Lot area 17.84% 5.85%
Total Wattage (watts) 4922 12,542
Ratio of Frontage to Lot wattage 90.09% 64.84%
Figure 16: Modeled medium sized auto dealership – purple shaded area represents sales frontage
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 225
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 148
Figure 17: Modeled large sized auto dealership – purple shaded area represents sales frontage
Vehicle Service Station Canopies and Hardscape
The Statewide CASE Team verified the Vehicle Service Station Canopies and Vehicle Service Station
Hardscape assumptions by examining a number of gas stations located throughout California. The
Statewide CASE Team found a listing of gas stations for sale online and used the listings to obtain
addresses, lot sizes, and building sizes. The Statewide CASE Team then used a measurement tool in
Google maps to estimate canopy and hardscape size. Based on the gas stations sampled, an average
hardscape to canopy (H/C) ratio was calculated to be ten to one. In other words, for every one square
foot of gas station (vehicle service station) canopy built, ten square feet of gas station (vehicle service
station) hardscape is built.
The Statewide CASE Team took the results of this analysis and weighted it by gas station density,
applied by county. Figure 18 is a map of California which estimates gas station density by county. The
results of the weighted average are essentially the same as the non-weighted average. The results of this
analysis validated the Statewide CASE Team’s assumptions for Vehicle Service Station Canopies and
Vehicle Service Station Hardscape which resulted in no changes to the assumptions.
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 226
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 149
Table 128: Vehicle Service Station Canopies and Hardscape Assumptions Analysis Results
County Building Size
(ft2)
Canopy Size
(ft2)
Hardscape Size
(ft2)
Lot Size
(ft2) H/C Ratio
Los Angeles 800 6083 16199 22500 3
West Covina 1596 2700 25760 30056 10
Alameda 3000 2091 19825 36547 9
Santa Clara 2735 1306 22379 29620 17
Orange 3050 1699 17467 22216 10
San Bernardino 1862 1612 13079 16553 8
Riverside 4100 3223 79797 87120 25
San Diego 912 3575 18513 24829 5
Fresno 921 2868 34774 40000 12
Kern 2050 2657 13982 26349 5
Sacramento 3800 2311 14252 18820 6
Average 2257 2739 25093 32237 10
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 227
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 150
Figure 18: California Energy Commission gas station density estimates by county
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 228
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 151
Appendix J: S TAKEHOLDER S URVEY
The Statewide CASE Team conducted as survey in 2017 to solicit feedback on the proposed code
changes from a wide variety of stakeholder. The anonymized responses are shown in Figure 19 through
Figure 34.
Figure 19: Stakeholder survey respondents’ industry role.
Figure 20: Stakeholder survey respondents’ experience in lighting industry (as number of years).
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 229
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 152
Figure 21: Stakeholder survey respondents’ geography.
Figure 22: Assumptions for LED modeling.
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 230
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 153
Figure 23: Willingness to provide data.
Figure 24: EMI/RFI assumptions for LEDs.
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 231
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 154
Figure 25: Range of CCT for outdoor applications.
Figure 26: Common types of dimming control systems used.
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 232
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 155
Figure 27: Frequency of variable CCT system usage in outdoor settings.
Figure 28: Outdoor applications where CCT systems are not available.
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 233
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 156
Figure 29: Variable CCT system assumptions.
Figure 30: Frequency of variable CCT system techniques.
Figure 31: How variable CCT system techniques differ.
Q11: Please indicate how strongly you agree or
disagree with all the following statements:
Strongly
Agree
Somewhat
Agree Neutral Somewhat
Disagree
Strongly
Disagree
Variable CCT systems will be common in outdoor applications in
the next 3 years.0 0 2 0 1
Variable CCT systems are less efficient than non-tunable
luminaires. Example: variable CCT system set 3000K vs non-tunable
3000K luminaire.
0 1 2 0 0
Variable CCT systems are significantly more expensive than non-
tunable luminaires.0 2 1 0 0
The cost of variable CCT systems prevents their widespread use.0 1 2 0 0
Skipped 4
Answer Choices Responses
Dim to Warm tuning: ___% of fixtures.2
White color tuning: ___% of fixtures.2
Full color tuning: ___% of fixtures.2
Skipped 5
Q12: How frequently are the following CCT techniques used
in nonresidential outdoor lighting applications?
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 234
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 157
Figure 32: Assumptions on rating “max” power for variable CCT systems.
Figure 33: Assumptions on how to classify variable CCT systems.
Answer Choices Responses
yes 2
No. Plenty of interior applications for it. Just not exterior. It's not
like the moon changes color...2
no opinion 2
Skipped 5
Q15: In your experience, do you consider variable CCT systems to be a unique
system of lighting or system of controls? Please explain.
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 235
2019 Title 24, Part 6 CASE Report – 2019-NR-LIGHT1-F Page 158
Figure 34: Willingness to have follow up conversations.
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 236
GARRETT AVVIA SALARIA
VIA
NOMEN
TA
NA
V IA B IS S O L O T T I
VIA
BARBERI
NIVIA VENETOCORSO DI
I
TALI
AN GLOVER AVV IA S IS T IN A
VIA CAVO
U
RN TH
IRD
AVPOI
NSET
TI
A CTW MOUNTAI
N VI
EW DRJ
ASMI
NE WYP
L
A
Z
A
M
A
RPLAZA FLO
RAPLAZA SIERRACO RTE ENTRADA
S P A RROW S T
PT
L
A
J
O
L
L
A
D
R
BA L L A S T P T C TPT CONCEPCION CTPT S A L C TPT CABRILLO CTPT REYES C T
PT L O MA C TPELICAN PT CTWEST PT DRPT ARGUELLO DRPT ESTERO DRJ E R E MY PT CTP T B U CH ON C T BLUFF PT CTSUNSET PT CTPT S U R C TPT MUGU CTD A N A P T C TPESCADERO PT CTPR E S ID I O P T C T
PT
S
A
N
L
U
I
S
C
T
PT DELGADA CTR
A
C
E
P
T
C
T
SE
AL PT CTTORTUGA PT DRPT ARENA C T
C R O W N P T C T
P T V ICENTE CT
PT
P
A
C
I
F
I
C
C
T
PT
C
A
I
M
A
N
C
T
P T D E F IA
N
CE CTPT MEDANAS CT
SAN MATEO PT CTFA
L
S
E
P
T
C
T
AR
R
O
W
P
T
C
T
LONG PT CTPT
F
E
R
M
I
N
E
C
TPT D U M E C TPT H U E N E M E C TSAN PEDROPT C TCAVERN PT CTM
ORRO PT CT
PT B
ARROW DRB O S W E L L C T
WOODSPRING DR
WILDBROOK PLSKYBROOK PLCOLDBROOK CTWILLOWBROOK CTCEDARSPRING DRASHBROOK DR
PEBBLEBROOK PLLAGO MA D ER OLAGO MADER OL AGO VENTANAN O R T HSH
O
R
E
DRSTONECREE
K PLHAMDEN DR
HARTFORD STBLUELAKE DRCLEARWATER PLWATERTOWN L
N
NEW HAVEN D R
THOR
N
T
O
N
R
D PORT CL
ARI
DG
EZINFAND EL TERGAMAY TERCAB ER N ET D R
PORT ALBANS
R U E B A Y O N N EPORT HARWICKRUE AVALLON
RU
E CHATE AUH IL L S IDE DRP OR T ASHLEYPORT
S
TIRLING
POR
T C
ARDIFFR
EI
S
LI
N
G
T
ERMERLOT PLHI L LSIDE DR
RUE M I C H ELLE
PORT CHELSEAPORT RENWICKPORT DUNBARRUE LE
BLA
N
C
R
U
E P
AR
CPORT TRINITYALEJA ND RA PLAU GU ST INA P LCARLO S CAN YO N CTLAS ESTANCI
AS DRDAMAS PLPATOS PLP
E
R
L
A
S
C
T
R
E
DL
A
NDS PLOVERLAND CTELKHORN CTP IN E R ID G E CTDON C A R L OS CTBLUE FALLS DREAGLE PEAK CTME
N
T
A
C
T
E
LI
R
I
O
C
T
E
A R B U S TO CTEJ
ARRON PZFLORI
DO P ZH AY U C O
P
ZPE T A
L
O
P
Z
FEST IV AL CT
H
OLID AY C T
TEENA DRWO
O
D
L
A
R
K
L
N
WOODLARK CTMAPL E DRCOR
ALWOOD C TRICHMOND PARK PLH
O
R
T
O
NYER BA
LN DESERT I
NN WYT R O O N W Y CORTE MARIPOSAGAVI O T A C T
C A S A B O N IT A C TPZ
NA
TA
L
IA PZ MIG UEL
PZ
P
A
O
L
O
PZ
C
A
R
L
O
S
PZ LEONARDO
RENOIR
L
N
MATISS
E
L
N
CE
Z
A
N
N
E
L
N
VAN
G
O
G
H
L
N
MONET LN
C A L L E D E L O S POTROSS E N D A ANGOSTAVIA DELCABALLOBLANCOO LD D A IRY WYOLD DAIR Y
O
L
D
D
A
IR
Y
LN
TRAIL
BLAZE
CTFEATHERROCK CTSHADOWROCK CTHICKO R Y TER
O AK VIEW TERRED HILL LNT
U
L
A
N
E
A
V
S
C
RIP
P
S A
V
F
O
RDHAM AV
V
A
S
S
A
R A
V
IT
H
A
C
A
C
T LAGUNA SECA LOOP
W IL L OW CR E
EK CI
RA
M
ELIA ISLAN D DRCOBB MEADOW PLPEACHTREE CIRF O
REST LAKE DR
CHER
VIL C
T
CARDAMON CTCOR IANDER CT
C IN N A M O N C T
T
U
ME
R
I
C TERPASEO MARGUERITARED OAK PLCO
R
DO
VA CT
GR
A
N
A
D
A
W
Y
D
O
R
A
D
O
C
T
R IV E R C R EE K C T
WINDY WYOCEAN BREEZE WYOCEAN VIEW LNM O U NTA IN R ID GE RD
VALLEY RIDGE STH S T
T R A N Q U IL O L N
JA SP ER CTJA DE CT
ALVO
C
A
W
Y REGENCY CTREG ENC Y CTMELROSE CTMELROSE CIROTAY VALLEY CIRC A M L A U D R
W INDSOR C IRE PARK
LN
CE
N
T
E
R
S
T
GO L D O A K C T
CHANTEL CT BERMUD A DU NE S P L PZ ANITAP
Z
L
O
R
E
N
Z
OCAMINO ROBERTO
PZ A
L
O
N
Z
O
N
PZ ME
R
C
I
A CAMINO DAVIDJOSEFINA PLARBORCREEK LNSADDLEHO R N DR
CH
A
R
D
O
N
N
A
Y
T
E
R
SAUTERNE PLALDERBROOK PLSEA ISLAND PLCRYSTAL DOWNS DRTAL L PINES DRPACIFIC GROVE LPPACIF I C G ROVE LP
AB A L O N E P T C TROCKY PT CTC H E R R Y P T D R
L A G U N A P T
C
T MALIBU PT CTD
IABLOPT CT
B U E N A VISTA CTLOS PI
NOS CTLAS ROSAS CTPR
E
S
T
O
N
L
NPR E S
TO
N
PLC A
L
L
E
TE
M
P
R
A
TE
M
P
R
A
P
L
1
2
2VI
L
L
A
T
E
M
P
R
A
D
R
3
LA
T
E
M
P
R
A
C
O
R
T
E
3
1BR
IG
HT
WO
O
D
A
V
MAR
I
E
T
T
A
S
T OLEANDER DRF R E D E RICKA PKWYAN
I
T
A
J
U
N
E
C
T VIS
T
A DEL RANCHOANCURZA WY
A
V
EN
I
DA
M
AD
ER
A
CIR
C LJ C E R VA N TE S
C
L
J
C
A
R
B
O
N
1 CLJ CUIDAD2CLJ MALAGA3
CLJ AND ALUSIA4CLJ ALHAMBRA5CLJ MONTEFRIO6
C
L
J
S
E
G
O
V
I
A
C
L
J
P
A
L
A
C
I
O
SCLJ ESPANASUMMIT D RCAMINO CATALONIAP
Z
C
A
T
A
L
O
N
I
A
AVENIDA YSIDORAR
E
D MOU NTA IN C TBL U E F AL LS C TCRYSTAL CREEK CTM
IS
T
Y
ME
A
DOW CTR A IN F O R EST R DHAZY GLEN CTPZ ULTIMAPZ ESCA LA NTEPZ VISTA MARPZ GAR
DEN
IA
PZ ELENAW V A Q UERO CT
E VAQU ER O C T
P
Z
S
I
N
O
U
S
O
ZA
R
Z
A
C
T
E
AC
E
B
O
C
T
ECIRCU
L
O
V
ERDET
A
X
CO CTPASEO DEL N OR T E
PASEO SIERRAPASEO PRIMAVERACTE PRIM A V E R A PEPPERWOOD CTW H IT E H O R S E C T
CABERNET DR
ROLLING RID G E R D
S E A B RE E Z E
RIVERBEND WYRUE C HAMO ND
R
U
E
V
A
L
B
O
N
N
E RUE MARSEILLESPOR
T
C
A
R
N
E
Y
MEADOWBROOK LNCR
O
S
S
C
R
E
E
K
R
D
B L UE W A T ER LNSHOREVIE W P L
8
WHISPER ING PA LMS LP
8
1
2
PLEASAN T VA LLEY P L1
4
ARRO WHE AD CT4
PEP
P
ER GLEN WYWHISPERING TRAILS DRQUIETCREEK WY1
1
OA
K
K
N
O
L
L
C
T
PEA
C
O
C
K
V
A
L
L
E
Y
R
D ASHFORD CASTLE DRGRAND FORKS RDFE A T H E R R IV E R R D
POPPY HILLS DRINVERNESS AV2
HI D D E N VALLEY AV1
2
3 VALLEY GARDENS DR
4
BELV
I
A
L
N
A NNA LIND A PL
ANNA LIND
A
C
T
ANNA LIND A DRAVENIDA ROSACRES
T
E
D
B
U
T
T
E
S
T SAN RAFAEL PLSAN ANGELO PLSAN JU AN P LSAN JACINTO PLSAN JOSE CTSAN LUCAS PL
SAN PA
BLO PLSAN BRUNO PLSAN MARINO PLCT
M E N D O T A S T
THISTLEWO
OD
AV
BRAMBLEW
O
O
D
S
THOLLYBROOK
AVB R ID L E V A L E R D
RAVEN
R
O
C
K
C
TFAWNTAIL CTL O N E TREE RDF E R NWOOD RDB O U QUET CANYON RDS
T
R
A
WB
E
R
R
Y
V
A
L
L
E
Y
D
R
C
O
V
E
Y
P
L
E
L
K
R
U
N
P
L
B
R
E
E
Z
E
WOOD DRCHATEAU CTVI
STA OAK PLS
T
O
N
E
CANYON RD1
2
2 COALIN GA PL
1 WO ODFORDS PL
4
3
G
R
A
Y
S
O
N
C
T
MAYWO
O
D CT
D
U
N
S
M
U
I
R
C
T APPLEGATE ST3 GREENFIELD CT4 IO WA HILL CT
VI
A
C
A
P
R
I
LIVE OAK ST
STA
N
I
S
L
A
U
S
D
RMA N N I S A V
MAR
I
O
N
C
T
C
L
O
V
I
S
C
TSANTA LUCIA RDCORDELIA ST
AMAD
O
R
S
T
VI
S
A
L
I
A
C
T
RI
N
C
O
N
P
TAC ER O
P
LMANZAN
O PL
PA D ERA CT PAL
E
N
C
IA P
L
MONT E R A C T
PAC IFIC AVMILAGROSA PLMILAGRO
S
A CIR
M IL A G R O S A C I R
QU
A
Y
A
V
G S
T MARINA PKWYFI
FTH AVGLO
V
ER
AVGARRETT AVFIG
AVGU AVA
AVFO UR TH
AVGA RR ET T
A
V
PAR
K
W
Y
H
E
DGE WYE PAR
K
LNBEE CH
AVCE DA R
AVELD ER
AVGU AVA
AV
E ST
BR OA DW AYFIFTH
AV
LAN
D
IS
AVBR
IGH
TW
OO
D
AVGLO
V
ER
CT
C S
T
FO UR TH
AVDATE
AVSMITH
AV
M C IN T O S H S T
OA K
LAW
N
AV
SEA
V
A
L
E
S
T
E ST
CO LO RA DO
AV
H S TWOODLAWN AVWOODLAWN AVTHIRD AVN FO
U
RTH
AVJASO N P L LANDI
S AVDE
L
MA
R
AV
M U R R A Y S T
H A L S E Y S TELM AVI ST
TWIN OAK
S AVWHITNEY AV
LAGUNA ST VISTA
W
Y
J S
T J PLELM AVALP
IN
E
AVTHIR
D
AVGA RR ET T
A
VDE
L
MA
R
C
TSEC O ND
AV
WH
I
T
N
E
Y-
M
A
N
K
A
T
O
S
T
FIRS
T
AV
M A N K A T O S TLINDA LNC A S IT A S C T
SH
A
S
T
A
S
T
H S
T
VISTA PLG S
T
ALPINE AV VISTA
W
YCORTE MARIA AVVISTA WY
C O O K C
T
OLA
C
T
F ST TWIN
O
AKS
AVSEC O ND
AVTHI
RD AVCY
P
R
E
S
S
S
TPATRICI
A AVLAS FLORES DRELM AVDE
L
MA
R
AVCHURCH AVTHIR
D
AV
D S
T
SEC O ND
AV
CH
U
L
A
VI
S
T
A
S
T
SEC O ND
AV
SEA
V
A
L
E
S
T
SE A V A L E S T DEL MAR AVC S T
S H IR L E Y S TBAYVIEW W YN IX O N P L
T R O U S D A L E D R PRESS LNALPIN
E
-
M
INO
T
AVFIRS
T
AV
CE
N
T
E
R
S
T ROSEVIEW PLF S T EUCALYPTUS CTHILLTO
P
D
R
BONITA RD
E STMARIGOLD PLE ST RO SE MAR Y
D
R
D S
T
E FLOWER STCO RT E
MAR
IA
D O R A N CTVI
STA WYD S T L
A
S
FLORES DRLAS FLORES DRMI
NOT AVJE FFE RS ON
AV
I ESP
LAN
AD
EE PAR
K
LNBEECH AVJ S
T
ASH AVBEE CH
AVCE DA R
AVDATE
AVFIFTH
AVELD ER
AVWO O DLAW N
AVJE FFE RS ON
AV
J E
SP
LAN
AD
EFO UR TH
AV
J S
T
GLO
V
ER
AVGA RR ET T
A
VFIG
AVCOLORADO AVMAD
ISO
N
AV
L S
T DATE
AVCEDAR AVFIFTH
AV
NA
P
L
E
S
S
T MAD
ISO
N
AVOAKLAWN AVJEFFERSON AVGR AN
JAS
RD
C L A R IS S S TWELTON S T
L S
T FO UR TH
AVKITTIWAKE LNTWIN
O
AKS
AV
MILLAN
S
T
CH UR C H
AVDE
L
MA
R
AVELM AVFAIRWAY CTS A N M IG U E L C T
SAN M IG U E L D R FIRS
T
AV
L S T
FO UR TH
AV
N IC K M A N ST
N A P L E S S T
W E IS S E R W Y
E M E R S O N S T
OX FO RD
C
TBR OA DW AY
S H Y L N
Q U E E N A N N E D R DE
L
MA
R
AV
O X F O R D S T KAR EN
WY
MOSS ST
JAC Q UELIN
E WYEMER
S
O
N
S
TTWIN OAKS AVALPIN
E AVELM AVTHIR
D
AV
KEN
N
E
D
Y
S
T
A M Y S T
OR D E
C
T
M O R E H O U S E PLSHERYL AVCOSTA AVEL LUG
A
R
S
TTRENTON AVWALNUT AVO X F O R D S T
AD
A
S
T
JAYKEN WYBR OA DW AY
AN ITA ST
MAN
Y
A
S
T SILVAS STJA CQ U A ST27TH STADA ST
S TELLA S T
BAY BLBELLE
S
T
ELISE
S
T
D O R OT HY ST
BROADWAYFOURTH AVORA NGE AV THI
RD AVZEN
I
T
H
S
T
FOURTH AV
B
E
Y
E
R WYMON
T
G
O
M
E
R
Y
S
T
ZEN
I
T
H
S
T CO N NO LEY A VCITRUS WYORANGE AV
HILLTO P D R
M A IN S T JA DE AVJASPER AVLOMA LNL O
MA CTSKYLARK WYLARKHAVEN DRMAX AVHELI
X WYMAX AVMYRA CTM AL ITO CTT A L US S TSANDSTON E C T
TURQU O ISE CTTOPAZ C T
TOURMALINE CT
E O R A N G E A VFIRST AVHELI
X AVJOSSELYN AVPALO
M
A
R
S
T
G L E N H A V E N W Y
LEO
M
A
L
N
TOB
IAS
DRDIXON WYFI
RST AVHE L
IX
AV
L E A N N A S T
CUYAMACA AVC H E R Y L P L
MELROSE AVE O X F O R D S TNOCTURNE CTMON
T
C
A
L
M
S
T
MON
T
C
L
AI
R
S
T
E CK M A N C T
A R IE
S CTMARL CTPIN E C TNOLAN CTP
R
I
NCESS MANOR CTQ U IN C E P LNAPA CTNACION AVM
O
UNTAIN VIEW LNNACI
ON AVPE
C
A
N PLO A K C TNI
LE
CTSONO
MA CTNOLAN AVMON TE RE Y
AVNA PA
AVNE PTU NE
DRNACI
ON AVNEPTUNE DRMISS
IO
N
CTNO R MA
CTNOLAN LNN
A
C
I
O
N AV
NO
V
A
P
L
E M O S S S T
MON SE RAT E
AVMYRA AVPOTRERO CTAGUA TI
BI
A AVVISTA
W
Y
MOS
S
S
T
CORTE MARI
A AVLAS BANCAS CTSAN MARCOS PL
FRI
AR
P
L
VALLE Y AV
RA
N
C
H
O
C
T MELROSE AVM AIN ST
SP
R
U
CE RDSYCAMORE DRBRANDYWINE AVA UTOPA R K DR
T E S O T A C T
TA
R
A
T
A
C
T
TIMBE
R
C
TTAMARACK S T
T I M BER S T
TILIA C
T
T A M A R A C K CTOLIVE AVOLEANDER AVTAL LOW CT
SEQUOIA CTSATINWOOD WYS
A
T
IN
WOOD CTO
C
A
LA CTTEAK CTOLIV E C T
Q U A IL C T C
A
RI
SSA AVRIV
E
R
A
S
T
L
I
L
AC AVHEATHE R C T
QU
I
N
C
E
S
T
VER
O
N
I
C
A
C
T
CAMELLI
A CTCARISSA CTLANTANA AVJ U N IP E R S T
OCALA CTORI
OLE PLRAVEN AVO R I O L E C T
OLEANDER AVCA RD
INA
L
PLRAVE
N A
VFINCH PLRAVEN PL
ROBIN PL
W
AXWI NG LNOSAGE AVOC ALA
AVOA S
IS
AVOCELOT AVOLEANDER AVOS SA
AV
IVY C
T
FO XBO R O
AV
E N
A
P
L
E
S
S
T
M ER ID IAN LN CLOUDWALK CANYON DRHAMPSHIR E LN DIAMOND D R SUNDOWN LNSUNDANCE CT
R AINBOW DRE NA PLE S C TMEDICAL CENTER DRCONCOR D W
Y
G E O RGETOWN P L
BRANDYWINE AVSONORA DRSE QU O IA ST
BRANDYWINE AVM
ENDOCINO DR
AU TO P AR K AV
GE
O
R
G
I
N
A
S
T
WH
I
T
N
E
Y
S
T
E MAN
K
A
T
O
S
T
DE NN
IS
AVGRETCHEN RDKEARN E Y C T MELR OS E
AV
E J ST MELROSE AVE M IL L A N STMI
SSI
ON AVNEPTUNE CTNOLAN AVE JA M ES CTN
A
CI
ON AVWI
NDSOR CI
RE H S TOLD RANCH R DPEPPER T R E E R D
D O VAR Y R D
T E L E G R AP H CANYON RD CAMINO VISTA REALEL CAPITA N DR
N O L A N WY E L STTAMAYO DRB E R L A N D W YGILBERT PLE J ST
A LLV I E W C T
FLOYD AVSKY H I L L CT CASSIA PLCO
R
T
E
C
E
R
R
A
D
A
V IA C URVADA
CREST DRDA LE C TWI
LER DRD
OVER CTDEL REY PL
A N Z A W Y
A RROYO C TMESA PLREDBUD PLLOWEWOOD PLHIDDEN VISTA DR
W
E
S
T
V
I
E
W
C
T
W
E
S
TVIEW DRWESTVIEW PLPARKSIDE DRP A R KSIDE CTTRAM PL
WINDROSE WY
SMOKY CI R
RO N NA P LHORIZON
V
I
E
W
D
R VI
STA CORONADO DRE H ST ARGA PLCAZORLA AVV ER I N L N
MARCILLA WYPLAZ
A
C
TCIE
NE
GA
DRVALLEY VI
STA FORKM E S A V IS T A L N CRESTA BONI
TA DRDU FFY
W
Y
B O N IT A M E S A R D
ME
S
A
V
E
R
D
E
R
D
PALO L N
VISTA PO I N T E
A
VENI
DA PALOWIN
D
Y
L
NKELLIE CTLYNDA PL
S A N M IG U E L C T
LOMACITAS LN
VALLEY RDPASEO DE LA VISTAWALLACE DR PLU T O CT
WHEE
L
IN
G LNWINNETKA DRSCHAUMBERG PLWINNETK
A
D
R
BARRINGTON CTC A F E A V E N I DA
B U T T E R N U T H O L L O W L N
W H IP P O O R W IL L L N
BRAM AVBONITA WOODS DRCASA BONITA DRSWEETWATER RDROBINWOOD RDROBINWOOD RDVIA DEL A
L
L
AZON
CALLE E S C A R P A D A
CA
M
I
N
O
E
L
E
V
A
D
O CALLE LA MIRADACAMI
NO DEL CERRO GR
ANDE
B U C K AROO LN
WR
A
N
G
L
E
R
C
T
A L L E N S C H O O L L N
ALLE
N SC
HOOL R
D
L O M A P A S E O
MAVER
IC
K
PLSURRE Y D R
CORR A L CTSURREY PLWA G
O
NWHEEL WYR A W H I DE CT
LYNWOOD D
R
L
YNNDALE LNLYNND
A
L
E PL
B O N ITA R D
A
N
D
O
R
R
A
WY GLEN ABBEY BLCORDELE LNTHE HILL RDBONITA RDOTAY
LAK
ES
R
DBONITA RDVA
LLE VERDE S TPAL
M
D
R
V IA LA P A
L
OMALA CR E S C E NTIA DRVISTA MIR AN D AALMONTE PLVIA ARMADOPOSITAS RD
VISTA MIRANDAC
A
R
L
O
S CANYON DR AVENIDA DEL REYROSITA CTBAYO N A LP
CORRALES L
NES PU ELA S C TBAYONA LPPADRONE PLALAGRIA PLC I M A D EL REY
OTAY LAKES RD
SEREN A C IR
REGU
L
O P
L
V IA GOYAPLAZA MIRODAS RANCHO DEL REY PKW YCARDONA A VGREDOS PLESLA DRMANSIONE S LNMAJESTAD LN
N R
A
N
C
H
O
D
E
L
R
E
Y
P
K
W
Y
A
B
A
R
CA CTABETO DRCARLO S C ANYON D
R
VALENCIA CTBUENA VISTA WYC E RRITOS CTLOS COCHES CTSANTA CRUZ C T
LA MANCHA PLS O U TH V IE W C T
G O T H A M S T
CAR
O
LY
N DR
LOYOLA CTCITADEL C T
X
AVIE
R AV
E H S T YU BA
D
R
B R IS T O L C T
H A M P T O N C TAZUSA CT
BAYLOR AVCUMB
R
E VIE
W
VI
A LA CUESTAEN CA NTAD A C T
CUMBRE VIE
W
CANYON DRCANYON DRC AN YO N CTSANDY CRE EK D R COUNTRY VISTAS LNWHITE
B
I
R
C
H
CO U N T R Y VISTAS LNCHERRY HIL L S L NCOUNTRY VISTAS LNC H A P A R R A L D R
CA N Y O N R ID G E D R
LAREDO CTC
H
A
R
R
O C
TRIMCREST CTC RE STVIE
W
D
R
COUNTRY VISTA S L N
W
OODGLEN TER
GLEN CREEK DR
CORRAL CANYON RD
GALVESTON WYCOLTRI
DGE LNHORSESHOE CTTRAILRID G E D R
RIDGE CREEK DR
GO LD RU SH
C
IRSOUTH PO I N T D R
CLEARBROO K D R
BROOKSTO N E R DE H STSOUTHSHORE DRLAKESHORE DREDGEWATER DREASTSHORE TEREASTLAKE DR
CORRAL CANYON RDST
CLAIRE DRLA SALLE CTPEPPERDINE CTGROSSMONT CTAPACHE DRBUENA VISTA WYTELEGRAPH CANYON RDW IL D O A K RD
E J S T CANARI
OS CTAMENA CTO
T
A
Y
L
A
K
E
S R
D
C
O
RONA VISTA
OTAY LAKES RDSTONERIDGE CTRI
DG
E
VIE
W CT
FALLBRO O K C TACACIA AV
LA
C
R
E
S
T
A
WYTIMRICK LNC
HOC CLIFF DR
MARTIN CANYON CTCOLLING RD E
C
O
L
L
I
NG
R
D W
BO
N
C
T
BONITA VIEW DR CAP R IO L E C T
LA V A DE L N
G O LFG LEN DRACACIA
AVLAZY T R A IL S C T
S H A D O W CANYON WYP A T H F INDER WYC
O
U
N
T
RY TRAILS LNSNAFFLE B IT PL
LEADROPE WYSTEEPLECHA
S
E
R
DCO
RRAL CANYON
R
D MOUNT MIGUEL RDE H STF E N T ON S T
EASTLAKE PKWYO TAY LAKES R D
C
A
L
L
E T
ESO
R
O
HI L T O N H E AD RDCLU
B
H
O
U
S
E
D
R
GR
E
E
N
S
G
A
T
E
D
R
CL
U
B
H
O
U
SE DR
BODEGA BAY DRHALF MOON BAY DREASTLAKE PKWYN GREEN S V IE W D R
L A C OSTA AV
3 3R D S T B AVC AV32ND
S
T
I AVJ AV
L A G O O N D R
BAY BLG U N P O W D E R P O IN T D R
W 3 2 N D S T
S A N M IG U E L D RFIRS
T
AVCLUB V
I
EW TERS IE R R A W Y
SESAME ST SAGE VIEWTELEGRAPH CANYON RD
R O M A N W Y
EQUITATION LNBONITA MESA RDGRANDVI
EW PLPUTTER DRC R E L A S T
BIGGS CT
FRONTAGE RDBAY BLI
NDUSTRI
AL BLPA L O MAR STBAY BLC E N T R A L A V
ORANGE AV WILLO
W STORCHARD HILL RDE
V
E
R
G
R
E
E
N
R
D TENNI
S COURT LNE H STA STPALO
M
A
R
S
T
LOU
R
E
T
A
VALAMITO S A V
MAR IAN AV
19TH S TAN ITA A VBOUNDARY AVBO UN D ARY AV SATURN BLSEC O ND
AVMAC E STCLAIRE AVGRETCHEN RDDENNI
S AVARTHUR AVBELI
NDA WY
ROBERT AVCARLA AVP
E
N
E
L
OPE DRCARV
A
L
OS DR
AYAMONTE WYO TAY LAKES R DVILLAS C TVIL L A S DRVILLAS DRAN
I
T
A
S
T
K STCORTE MARI
A AVFI
RST AVHIG
H
LAN
D
AV
E 28TH
S
T M AVN AVHOOVER AVASH
AV
F S T
BR OA DW AY
K S T BR
IGH
TW
OO
D
AVBR
IGH
TW
OO
D
AV
R
E
O
D
R ART EM
IA
W
YMINO
A
W
YVESUVIA WYMOUNT MIGUEL DRM ARMIL AVF
LEM
IN
G
DRALS
TO
N
AV
CAGLE ST
P
A
S
E
O
P
O
TRIL
P R O C T O R V ALLEY RDPLA
Z
A D
E
L CID N RANCHO DEL REY PKWYHUERT
O
PL
P
ADERA WYM
I
L
A
G
R
O
S
A
W
Y
A B E TO CT
BURGA LPPASEO ROSALGA
L
D
A
R
P
L
PASEO BURGAS E R R A N O LN
R O S A L C T
ARDILLA PL
N O R EL L A S T
S R A N C H O D E L R E Y P KW YPLAZA CAPOTEPLAZ A NA RIS CO
C AMINO ATAJOVERANO DRVIA SIN U O SOQUAY AVW 28TH
S
T
NATIO
N
A
L
C
ITY
B
L
BAY BLN SECOND AVREO DRCA
LLE
AB
AJOCYPRESS ST32ND
S
T G S
TSHELBY DROLI
VE STJEFFERSON AVS R -5 4 F R E E W A Y
S R -5 4 F R E E W A Y HI
GHLAND AVVIA TRIESTET H E R E S A W YMO
NTEREY AVE E M E R S O N S T
NI
LE AVNOLAN AVE N
A
P
L
E
S
S
TNITA CTMI
SSI
ON AVMAR
IA
WYMON TE RE Y
CT
T E L E G R A P H C AN YO N R D
MELROSE AVMON SE RAT E
AVCUYAMACA AVELDEN AVCRANN AVFO UR TH
AVFI
FTH AVP A L O M A R S T
WI
LLI
AM AVTOB
IAS
DRHILLTOP DRJICAMA W Y
PLATANO CTJUDSON WYE P R O S P E C T S T THE RE SA
W
YMAX AVECKMAN AVMYRA CTMAPLE
C
T
SPRUCE CTM
E
L
R
O
SE AVP R O S P E C T C T
I
NDUSTRI
AL BLBEECH AVM O S S S T THI
RD AVFI
FTH AVO R S E T T S T
H E N R Y L N TOBI
AS DRP A L O M A R D RELSIE WYELM AVPATRI
CI
A AVFIF IELD ST
DURWARD STTELE GRA PH CAN YON RD
LORI L
N
HALECREST DRENTRADA PLH A R V A R D STTAMPA CTVIA HACIENDADRAKE CTAUSTIN CTF S T FIG
AVBRI
GHTWOOD AVG S T
V A N C E S T
OA K
LAW
N
AVOAKLAWN AVBR OA DW AYI ST DATE
AVCEDAR AVFIFTH
AVELDER AVI ST
THIR
D
AVTHI
RD AVCORTE MARI
AHI
LLTOP DRLOU
A
L
T
A
W
Y
ALVARADO S T
OT IS STMINO
T
AV
B O N IT A R D
ROGAN RD
REGENCY WYPALM AVOTAY VALLEY RDWALNUT DRLO TU S D R MARBLE CTSLAT E CT
MARL AVMELROSE AVC S T
AN ITA ST CIR UE LA C TMADI
SON AVWOODLAWN AVB STC STD S
T ELDER AVGA RR ET T
A
VMONTE VI
STA AVGLOVER AVASH AVLAZO CTCH O LLA
PLCALM A P L
E J ST
RE
DB
U
D R
D
CEDA
RBE
N
D WY
P A S E O D E L P A S OGREENWOOD P L
R IDGEV IEW W YWESTMONT CTC A M INO E
L
EVADOALTA LOMA D
R RIO VISTA DRRI
O VI
STA
P
L MESA VI
STA WYSARASONA WYALTA LOMA DRPALO DRROYAL PLB
ONI
TA VALLEY LNCAGLE STPLAZA
B
O
NITA C
E
N
T
E
R WYH
A
L
E
P
LFENTON STK
U
H
N D
RMILLER DRB OS W E L L RD
LANE AVB OS WE LL RD
BRIDGEPORTWATERBURYLAKESHORE D R
HOLLY WYWINDJAMMER CIR AUGUSTA PLEASTRIDGE LPG E N T R Y W Y
THIRD AVBANNER AVDATE ST
BE THU N E WY
CA
R
V
E
R
S
T
DOR OT HY S T HI
LLTOP DRCARLA AVMYRA AVA
DRIENNE DRVISTA DRBONI
TA GLEN
DRF AVCEDAR AVD S
TBROADWAYC S T
3 5 T H S T
OAKLAWN AVMARI
NA PKWYPLAZ A SE VILLE
C AM IN O B I S C AY
AVENIDA DE LA BARCAP A S E O MAGDAPA
S
EO RANCHERO
B UE NA VISTA W YGE
VILLEA WY
VISTA SAN MIGUEL
O LD O R C H A R D L N
O L D O R CH AR
D
RDS
L
E
E
PY HOLLOW LNROSEDALE D R
GLEN ABBEY BLRA
N
D
Y
C
T ROSEDALE DR BONITA RDM AIN ST BONITA WOODS
D
R
SOUTHW ES TERN COL L E G ES O N G B IR D L N
RUTGERS AVHOLLISTER STPALM AV BEYER WYPA L M AV
AGNO CT
BINDAY WYLANAO LNWAILEA WYLE ILAN I WYPOIPU WYMOLOKAI WYK AA NA PALI W Y
MAKAHA WYMABUHAY WYK
A
PALUA CT COCHRAN AVSHEPHERD LNDOOLITTLE AVLE MAY AVBY RD STMAITLAND AVG ATTY S T
C H AN UTE STMATHER AVP AL M AV S ER RE NA LN
B YR D S T
RICKENBACKER AVLE M O NS EED D R
C O NIFE R AV
CITR
U
S
A
V
PA LM A V PAL M AV
M AIN STINDUSTRIAL BLKILEY RD
KRISTA CTMOON VIEW DRDI
XON DRE N A P L E S S T
AGUA TI
BI
A AVVI
STA WYHI
LLTOP DRLINCOLN CTRAE PLGR
O
V
E
STS W E E T W A T E R R D DARDI
NA DRPALM RDEL
M AVS K I W Y DIAMOND CTN FI
FTH AVSWEETWATER RD
SWEETWATER RD
M E N A R D S T
B
O
NITA HEIGHTS LN
F A I R L O M AS R D FAIRLINDO WYDEL REY BLTERRA NOVA DRBO
NI
T
A
C
A
N
Y
O
N
R
D CEDARWOOD DRMINDANAO WYLUNGOS CT DEGEN DR
NERAK CTPRAY CTPRAY STPRAY STROMEGA CTTIMBOLL CTS
A
N
D
OVER CTD
E
G
E
N
D
R
MARGARET STS W E E T W A T E R RDSYLVI
A STANDERSON STBONI
TA RDDORY D R
A L E M A N P LFRISBIE STC E N T R A L A VBONITA RDAU DO BO N
CTHA ZE
LH
UR
ST
C
T
G LE N V IE W P LGLEN VERDE
C
T
G LE N V E R D E D R
BONI
TA GLEN TER DAWSONI
A
S
T D R ES SAG E D RAMADIT
A LNAMAD
I
TA CTWATE RC RE ST
C
TSAN MIGUEL WYW A T E R C R E S T D R CONDUI
T RDS A N M IG U E L R D
C E N T R A L A V
ANNIE LAURIE LNMIRAR CT BELLE BONNIE BRAE RDP O N Y LNCORRAL CANYON RDROCK RIVER LNJOCKEY WYLOPING LNYEARLING CTGA LLO PIN G W Y
CORRAL CANYON RD DAI
RY RDSUMMIT MEADOW RDV
I
A TOSCANAVI
A CEDROVIA VERDEV IA MAR IAN AP
L
AZA A
M
IS
TADCAM IN O D E L S O L
C A L L E D E L A M O R
PASEO RANCHEROCAM I N O LA PAZCAMINO DEL SO L
CA M INO LA PAZ PLAZA LA PAZVIA LUNADE SIGN CT
N IRVANA AVEN
E
R
G
Y
W
Y
SESA ME ST PASEO RANCHEROT E L E GR A P H C A N Y O N R DPASEO LADERAWUESTE RD
OTAY LAKES RD
BO N IT A M E A D O W S L N
CRYSTAL SPRI
NGS DRSHOREACR
E
S
DRMYRTLE BEACH W Y
NEW SEABURY WYRIVIER
A DR
PROCTOR VALLEY RD
OTAY LAKES RDHUNTE PKWYP A S E O E N T R A D A
PASE O
VER
D
E
PASE
O
E
N
T
R
A
D
A
DEL PRADO CTDE ANZA CTTELEGRAPH CANYON RDP A S E O LA C R E S T A
E A S T L A KE PK WY
VIS TA D E L M A R C T
SECOND AVEASTLAKE PKWYS GRENNSVIEW DRA STSAN M IG U EL R DA STS A N M I G U E L RD
SAN M IG U E L R D
SA N MIG U EL R D
EL RANCHO GRANDEROLLING HILLS LNSP EYERS WYARROYO RDLOMA DEL SOL DRSUNN Y VIE W D R
FILLY LN SPRINTER LNWHIRLYBIRD WYC
ENTRAL
AVGOOD KAR M A LNWINNERS CIRBAR LEY CT
W H EATST ALK LNWILD OATS LNCOUNTRY TRAILS LNM O S S S T
COLORADO AVWO O DLAW N
AV
M O S S S T
A R IZ O N A S T
ALISO
C
T
GA
R
B
E
R
A
V
PLATO
D
ROVA
L
DR
PARK S IDE PLSAB
I
N
A
D
R ANALIESE WYPARKSIDE AVVIA M
A
N
R
I
L
PAS E O D E LA VISTAMALIT O DRMAL
PAZO CTB
A
Y
B
L CRESTA WYMADI
SON AVTO Y O N L NO LYMPIC PKWYIN G R AM STMARTIN PLE P A L O M A R S T
GO U LD AVDIAMOND DRALBER S T
HARLA N C TS IP E S C IR
KELSO CT
LEE CIRBRANDYWINE AVPRAIRIE DRP R O C T O R VAL L E Y R D
P RO C TO R VA L L EY RD
MEDICAL CENTER DRE J S T
L S T
E S T SWEETWATER RDSR-54 FREEWAYS R -5 4 F R E E W A Y SR-54 FREEWAYS R -54 FREEW AYI-8
05
F
R
E
E
WA
Y
LANE AVRAN C H O DRR AN CH O DR ELKS LNPU
T
T
E
R
P
L BRI
ARWOOD RDJ S TMARINA WYBEYER BLB
ROA
DWAYGENEVIEVE AVAN
G
E
L
A
L
N
HILLTO
P
D
R
HILLTO
P
C
T
GATTY CTFO UR TH
AV
J A M E S S T KEA
R
N
E
Y
S
TCE DA R
AVWID
GE
O
N
LNOR D V
IEW
CTSEC O ND
AV
KEA
R
N
E
Y
S
T
LEMIR
E
C
T
E M IL L A N C T
HALE ST
TIFFA NY CT
MONTEREY CTPORTSM O U TH D R
LAK ER IDG E C IRLAKESHORE DRMOU N T MIGU EL R DFO RE STE R
LN
SANIBELLE CIR
BELLE VI S T A D R
KARRA CTWO O DH O US E AV
PRINCESA CT
LOS
I
N
D
I
O
S
C
T
CA
LI
E
N
T
E
L
O
O
P
VIA MIRALESTEDEL SUR CTFRE SN O AVALBA NY A V
DEREKWYJACARANDA DRRIC
H
M
O
N
D
PAR
K
C
T
CA
S
S
E
L
M
A
N
P
L
PR
I
M
R
O
S
E
P
L
MAR
G
O
C
T GLEN ABBEY DR
H OR TON RD
THE HI
LL RD
RA
N
D
Y
L
N MUSTANG PLSTALLI
ON PLBR ON C O
P
L PIC
ASS
O
DR
B IR C H B A RKLN
VI
EW VERDESU N U P C TROCKY VIEW CTBLAC
K
S
M
I
T
H
R
D
MA ZAG O N LN MA
RTOS PLCAMINO ESP UE LAS
WAYNE AVMA
S
T
E
RS
RI
DGE
R
D
TORREY PINES R D
PALOMIRA CT
SH INO H AR A LN
TANBARK CTTANOAK CTDO R AD O
W
YCA M
INO
M
IELCHURCH AVR O O S E V E L T S T ALVAR
A
D
O
S
T
V A N C E S TM A D R O N A S T
E O LY M P IA C T
E O
R
L
A
N
D
O
C
T
E O
N
E
I
D
A
C
T
E PAIS
L
E
Y
S
T
E O
R
L
A
N
D
O
S
T
E O
L
Y
M
PI
A
S
T
E O
N
E
I
D
A
S
T
E P A L O M A R S T
QU
E
E
N
A
N
N
E
D
R
E O
X
F
O
R
D
S
T
E E M E R S O N S T
E L E A N N A C T
J A M U L A VINKOPAH S T
F O R T U NA STN O V A W Y
DO
N
A
H
O
E
S
T
BARRETT AVEVAN S
AVHELIX AVLOC
D
E
L
C
T EL L O R O S T
E R
I
E
N
S
T
R
A
S
T
P A IS L E Y C T
P R O S P E C T S T
P R O V E N C E CT
SH
E
R
W
O
O
D
S
T
QU
I
N
T
A
R
D
S
T
Q U IN T A R D S T
BISH
O
P
S
T
K IN G S W O O D D R
P A L A C T P IC O C T
P L Y M O U T H CTDIXON CTS LA TE STOC ALA AV
Q U IN O A C T
RIE
N
S
T
R
A
C
T
R IV E R A C TR IV E R A C TR IV E R A P L
S A N D S T O N E S T
Q U A IL D R
E R IE N S T R A S T
NO R STAD AVPIC CA RD AVBYRD WYFO SS S T
LINDB ER GH ST
TWINING AVCH AN U TE S T
M U R R IE T A C IR
PO W D E R H O R N D R
D
ELCARDO AVRE ED CT
BRITTON AV
RIO S AV
MELR
O
S
E
W
Y
TRE
M
O
N
T
S
T
TR EM O NT ST
TA
M
A
R
I
N
D
O
W
Y
C O NN O L EY C IR
AN ITA ST
FAIV RE ST
CH AR LES AVCH
A
R
L
E
S
A
V
LO UR ET AV
S UZANNE LN
K IM P LFIRS
T
AV
PET
E
O
C
T
A R IZ O N A S T
CR
E
S
T
E
D
B
U
T
T
E
S
T
V IL L A GE D R
W Y K E S S T
W E S T B Y S T
E M IL L A N S T
L E M IRE D R
CA M IN O E N T R A D A
E L C A P IT A N D R
E S A N M IG U E L D R
E S IE R R A W Y
E P A L O M A R D R
WH
I
T
N
E
Y
S
TSHASTA STCORTE MAR
IA
AVCLA
IRE
AVCA RLA
AV
E H S T
MI
SSI
ON C
T
S
H
E
FFIE
L
D CTMON TE RE Y
AV
M U R R A Y S T
M IT S C H E R S T
M ILL A N C T
K S T
M U R R A Y S T
KIN
G
S
T
COUN TRY CLUB D
R
P EPPER T R EE RD
V IA D E L A U R ENCIOE L R A N C H O V IS T A
LION
C
I
R
MON
T
E
B
E
L
L
O
S
T
S A N D A L W O O D D R
D A V ID S O N S T
MON
T
E
B
E
L
L
O
S
T
L A N S L E Y W Y
D A V ID S O N S T
RO
O
S
E
V
E
L
T
S
T
ALVAR AD O PL
E 30TH
S
T
E 3 0 T H S T
E 30TH
S
T
F L O W E R S T HI
LLTO
P
D
R
CA
S
S
E
L
M
A
N
C
T
31ST ST
CH
U
L
A
VI
S
T
A
S
T
F L O W E R S TSEA V A L E C T
F E R N S T
K IM B A LL TE R
WO O DLAW N
AV
C E N T E R S T
R O O S E V E L T S T
MAD
R
O
N
A
S
TBEE CH
AV
OT
I
S
S
TSMITH
AV
V A N C E S T
DAV
I
D
S
O
N
S
T
GU AVA
AVWEST MANOR DRHA
L
S
E
Y
S
TI ST
HA
L
S
E
Y
S
T
WH
I
T
N
E
Y
S
T
MAN
K
A
T
O
S
T
SH
A
S
T
A
S
T
SH
A
S
T
A
S
T
SIER
R
A
W
Y
GA
R
D
E
N
P
L
JA
M
E
S
C
T
GU AVA
AV
S A N M I G U E L D R
S IE R R A W Y
P A L O M A R D RTIDE
LAN
DS
AV
BAYS
I
D
E
P
K
W
Y
SAN D P
IPE
R
W
YFLO YD
AV
W ILLOW C R E S T WY
TIF FAN Y WY LA SENDA WYARROYO PLP
A
S
E
O D
E
L R
E
Y
BAJO CTB
A
J
O DRMESA CTLOMA VI
EWBU EN
T
IEMPO
D
RBEE CH G LEN DR
A
R
ROYO DRC HO LLA R D
C AL M A D RROCA PLR O C A RD
BL A C K W O O D R D RI
VER ASH DRFELINO W Y
LAWN VIEW DR
LEG
A
T
E
C
T
CR
E
L
A
S
T
PALO
CT
V E R D E C T
AVEN
I
D
A
S
A
N
MI
G
U
E
L
ALAME
D
A
W
YALISO
D
R
B A R D AGUERA PLSWEETWATER RDBONITA VERDE DR
CASA GRA
N
DE WY
CAROLYN VISTA LN
CA
L
L
E
F
L
O
R
E
C
I
T
A
KERNEL PLCA
MI
NI
T
O
E
S
T
R
E
L
L
ADEL CORRO PL
DEL CORRO CT LAGASCA PLC A LLE LA G A S C A
MOYA
PL PALEN
C
I
A
CT
AVENIDA SOLARIATIE R R A DE L RE Y
C A LLE DE DAM AS C O VIA TERECINAC A L L E DULCE
VI
A MAR AZULCAMINO D E L R E Y APAC H E D R
SOU T H VIEW C IR
WO
O
D
C
R
E
S
T
S
T
SUNNY CREST L N
E
A
G
L
E
VALLEY DRS
U
N
C
R
EE
K
DRWATERVILLE L A K E R D
E A S T R ID G E LOOPFOREST OAKS D R
FAIRWAY OAKS D R
DISCOVERY BAY DRALISA
L
LN
HA
R
B
O
U
R
T
O
W
N
P
L
3 BROOKS TRAIL CT4 BO
U
L
D
E
R
C
R
E
E
K
S
T
5 BOCA RATON ST6 WATE
R
W
O
O
D
C
T
B AY H ILL RD
PA
L
M
B
E
A
C
H
S
T
JA
S
MI
N
E
S
T OWEN DRCA
R
B
A
J
A
L
C
T
B IE R N A C K I C T
B IBLE R C T
DIA
M
O
N
D
D
R WH ITA KE R AV
R E D W IN G R D
OAK PL
E O
X
F
O
R
D
S
T
NA
N
E
T
T
E
S
T
SUNBURST LNCR ES CE NT D R
DAV
E
N
P
O
R
T
L
N
NA
N
T
U
C
K
E
T
D
RPACIFIC HIL
L STINDIGO CA N Y O N R D
M
A
RI
POSA CI
RM O N T C L A IR S T
J A M U L C T
M O N T C A L M S TINKOPAH S T
M A R IP O S A S T
M A N Z A N I T A S T
E PALO
M
A
R
S
TBUENA VISTA WYSU
B
O
L
C
T
CAGAYAN AV BLERIOT AVVER
U
S
S
TFRONTAGE RDMARSAT CT
PA LOMAR S TRIV
ER
LAWN
AV
SIER
R
A
W
Y
KEA
R
N
E
Y
S
T
JE FFE RS ON
AVOAKLAWN AVBR OA DW AY
H S
T
H S
T
G S
T
C A S S E L M A N S T
TWINOA
K
S
CIRBR
ISBA
NE
ST7TH S T
K ST
J S
T
GLO
V
E
R
P
L MINO
T
AVALPIN
E
AVMINO
T
AV
PL
AZ
A B
O
NIT
A
R
DPROSPECT STSTO CK MAN ST
STO
C
K
M
A
N
S
T
NE
W
B
E
R
R
Y
S
T
C A L M O O R W YCA LMOO R
ST
E I S T
I ST
E J ST
E L ST
E L ST
SEC
O
N
D
A
V
N A P L E S S T
O X F O R D S T
TO U RM A LINE ST
TEA
L
S
T
SYCAM O RE D R
ORANGE DRMALTA AV
MALTA AV
G RA N D TETON CTJU D SO N
W
YRANIER CTM E ADOWLARK AVCU YAMA CA
AVHI
LLTO
P
D
R
E Q
UI
N
T
A
R
D
S
TMONSERATE AVE PAIS
L
E
Y
S
T
OR
L
A
N
D
O
C
T
P R O S PECT CTPAR
K
D
RMELR
OS
E
AV
JU
D
SO
N
W
Y
THE
R
E
S
A
W
YGU ATAY AV
E M O S S S TMONSERATE AVE J A M E S S T
NA
C
I
O
NCO RT E
B E R L A N D W Y
S
T
A
R
W
O
O
D
C
I
RVISTA
N
AC
IO
N
D
RBAY
L
EAF DRBAY LE
A
F
D
R
P
A
RKSIDE DRAVEN
ID
A
PA
LO
V
ER
DE
SWE
E
T
W
A
T
E
R
R
D
PR
A
D
E
R
A
P
L
WILLOW ST
VALLEY
R
D
BALS
A
MI
N
A
D
R KEN N E
LWO
RT
H
LNKEN N ELWO R
T
H
LN
G R A C E R D
SWE
E
T
W
A
T
E
R
R
D
SWE
E
T
W
A
T
E
R
R
D
SU
R
R
E
Y
D
R
C A R M O N A CTLAD
I
O
S
A
C
T
M ILAG R O SA CT
DAW
N
C
TB
EACON PLT E R R A N O V A D R
E H
S
T
PASEO DEL REYDAV ID D R
DAV
I
D
D
R
HA LEC RE ST D R
DOUGLAS ST
OLEANDER AVTH R U S H S T
SIPE
S
C
IR
HIBISCUS CT
AZALEA S T
WIST ER I A S T LAUREL AVLAU
R
E
L
A
V
P O IN S E T T IA S T
Q U AIL PLSPR U CE ST
PEAR L W O O D S T
OLE AN DE R AVOC ALA AVI-805 FR EEW AYMAXW ELL R D
AUTO PARK PL MAXWELL RDLEE C
I
R
TELE
G
R
A
P
H
C
A
N
Y
O
N
R
D
ME
D
I
C
A
L
C
E
N
T
E
R
C
T WINDING OAK DRRE D MA PLE D R
E J S
T
CHESTN
UT CT
DU
O
R
O
D
RDUORO DRS R
A
N
C
H
O
D
E
L
R
E
Y
P
K
W
Y
PAS EO D E L R E Y
OTAY LAKES RD
SURREY DR
A C E R O S T
C A L L E M E S I T A
TI
M
S
TBON
I
T
A VI
EW DRSU
N
N
Y
S
I
D
E
D
R
SADDLE
W
OOD DRR A C IN E C TSYLVIA
ST
PR
A
Y
S
T
SWEETWA
T
E
R
R
D
SWEETWATER RDC ENTRAL AVHO R SE R ID GE WYSPR IN TER LN
OLD
D
AI
R
Y
C
T WI
LD OATS LNLON G CA NY O N D R
D
A
WS
O
N
IA
S
T
B O NITA CA N YON DR
RIDGEVIEW WYC A M IN O E L EVA DO
1
2
3
4 5
6
M A RBELLA CIRN RANCHO DEL REY PKWY
S RANCHO DEL REY PKWYCAMINO BISCAYE H STE H ST
R ID GE BA CK RD
VALEN
C
I
A
L
O
O
P
C A L L E C A N D E L E R O
C A L L E S A N T IA G O
CO
R
T
E
D
E
V
E
L
A
C O R T E D E C E R A
Y O R B A C T
B U E N A V IS T A W Y
V IA ESCALANTEPZ MIRALEST
EVIA M
O
N
A
D
APZ AMPARADA
E J STCAMINO CALABAZOPASEO DEL CERROPASEO SARINADEL RI
O CTTIERRA BONITA PLMESA GRANDE PLSHEPHERDS KNOLL PL1
1
M IR A C O S T A C I R
MIR
A
C
O
S
TA
CIR
MIRA
C
O
STA C
I
R
SO
U
T
H
W
E
S
T
E
R
N
C
O
L
L
E
G
E GO TH AM S T
G O T H A M S T
C
O
R
N
E
L
L AV
ITHA
C
A
S
T ITHA CA STELMH UR ST S T
ELMH
U
R
S
T
S
T YALE S T
YALE S
TAU BU RN AV
CO
L
U
M
B
I
A
S
T
ETO N C T
D A R T M O U T H S T
MILLS STRE DLA ND S
P
L
VIA E
N
C
A
N
T
A
D
A
C
O
R
R
A
L
C
A
N
Y
ON RD1
COUNTRY TRAILS CT1
C O UN TRY VISTAS LNPROCTOR VALL
EY RDPROCTOR VALLEY RD
JONEL WY
BO
R
D
E
A
U
X
T
E
R
CT
PR
O
C
T
O
R
V
A
L
L
E
Y
R
D
STANFOR
D A
V LEH IGH AV
K E N T S T
B U C K N E L L S T
D U K E S TCOE PLCR EE KWO O D WYMARQU E T T E R D
MAR Q U E T T E R D
M A R Q U IS C TS T G E R MAIN RDM A R Q U IS C T
V E R S A IL L E S R D
MARTINIQ
U
E D
R
RU
T
G
E
R
S
A
V
EAS
T
L
A
K
E
D
R
RIDGEWATER DRWATERSIDE DRCA
B
O
B
A
H
I
A
GOLFCREST LP
PAR K MEA DO W S R D
O AK HILL D R
LA VID A C T
S
G
R
E
E
N
S
V
I
E
W
D
R
ELM
WOOD CT
KNOLL
W
O
O
D P
LBEA R C R EEK PL
F O R ES T M EA DO W C T STEAMBOAT SPRINGS CTS
OUTH HI
L
L
S DRS P A N IS H B A Y RD
SILVERAD
O D
R
IN
DI
A
N
C
RE
E
K
DR
S G
R
E
E
N
S
V
I
E
W
D
R
H
U
N
T
E
P
K
W
YHUNTE PKWYPR OC TO R V ALLEY RD
WU
E
S
T
E
R
D OTAY LAK ES R DWU EST E
R
D
W
U
E
S
T
E
R
D
WU EST E
R
D
W UE ST E R D
O
T
A
Y
L
A
K
E
S
R
D
TURT
L
E C
A
Y W
Y
B
O
C
A R
A
TO
N D
R1 TURTLE CAY PL
SANTA LUCIA RDE PALO MA R S T
SAN
T
A
Y
N
E
Z
A
V MONARCHE DRM O NT GO M E RY S T
DE L MO N TE AV
M AC KE NZ IE C REEK RD
ANITA ST
MARIAN AV
PAS O RO B L E S C T
SAN GAB
RI
EL PLFALCON VAL L E Y DRROCK
I
NG HORSE DRSANT
A
M
A
D
E
R
A AV
M
A
R
Y
S
VILLE A
VWH EATLA ND S S TLIND SAY STSTANISLAUS DRMORGAN HILL DRMONTE SERENO DRSAN
T
A
Y
N
E
Z
A
V ST HELENA AVSTANISLAUS DRMONTE SERENO AVMORGAN HILL DRSAN TA
C
OR
A
AVBEL
L
E
NA AVSANTA CORA AVB R A M B L E W O O D CTSAN TA
D
ELPH
IN
A
AVPAC
IF
ICA
A
V
CO
L
U
S
A
S
T
MON
T
A
N
A
R
D
C L O V E R T R E E CTSAG
E
T
R
E
E
C
T DRY CREEK DRADOBE PL
S AD D L E B A C K S T
FLA GS T A F F C T
RI
VER ROCK RDR I V E R ROCK RDN VALLEY
V
I
EW DR2
2 S VALLEY VIEW DR
E
S
P
E
RANZA PLC
R
E
EK SIDE PL
L A F AY ETTE PL
WO
O
D
V
I
L
L
E
A
V
SA
N
T
A
A
L
I
C
I
A
A
V PIEDMONT STWESTMORLAND STLIV ING S TO N ST
GOLD RUN RDR
I
D
G
E
P
T
C
T
RUTH ERFO RD STCALISTOG A AVBOLE
RO DR
DE LEON DRVALVIDIA CT
S /N CABRILLO DRDE SOTO CTBALBOA CIRLO S A R C O S P L
1
1 ISLE WYRICARDO DRGON
Z
A
L
E
S
WY
EL CORTEZ C TMADRIGAL CTMAGEL
LANAGUIRRE DRWYTR AVE R C TVE RN O N C TCA L PE L LA C T
CO
L
T
O
N
C
T
G
L
E
N
E
L
L
E
N
S
T
RO
C
K
L
A
N
D
C
T
HO
P
L
A
N
D
C
T
LO
N
G
R
I
D
G
E
S
T
Q U A ILSPRINGS CTCOOLSPRINGS CTBE
L
L
E
N
A
C
T
MA
Y
F
I
E
L
D
C
T
L
A
R
K
S
P
U
R
C
T
MI
L
L
B
R
A
E
C
T
3CY
P
R
E
S
S
P
O
I
N
T
C
T
IN
D
I
A
N
C
R
E
E
K
P
LPO NT E V ED RA W Y
OLYMPIC PKWYGUS T
INE
STCA R ME L AV
BE
N
E
C
I
A
C
T
VO
L
M
E
R
P
E
A
K
C
T
SAN DIMAS CT
C
O
L
F
A
X
C
T
M O RGAN HILL DRSARATO
GA CT
D
ELA
NO CT
F
E
RN
DALE STH
A
N
F
O
RD CT
ANTIOCH AVNEWCASTLE CTFARMEVILLE STSTANISLAUS DR
CH
A
T
E
A
U
C
TMTN VI
EW WYB
OL
IN
AS BAY CTFAIRFIELD STAT W AT E R S T
RI
V
E
R
O
A
K
S
C
T
IN
D
I
A
N
P
A
L
M
S
C
T
GREENBRIAR DRS
O
M
E
R
S
E
T
C
T
PALM VALLEY CIRBAYW O O D
CI R
BR
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
CT
SU MMER H
I
L
L
AV
1 PINE ISLAND DR
1
NOBLE CANYON RDCHIMNEY FLATS LNHITCHING POST LNW AL K I N G S T IC K C T
AG
A
V
E
F
L
A
T
S
L
N
ROCK CREEKP LDESCANSO CREEK PLSI
L
V
E
R
S
P
R
I
N
G
S
D
RSC H O O L H O U S E R D
B
OR
RE
GO
SP RINGS RDTH
U
N
D
E
R
S
P
R
I
N
G
S
R
D
H
ID
DEN
S
PRING S PLFLINN SPRINGS RDGRANIT
E
S
P
R
I
N
G
S D
R
T
A
M
A
R
IS
K
G
R
OV
E DRLO NE P I NE C TCEDAR GROVE CTOAK SP RING S DR
A
P
P
A
L
A
C
HI
A
N
P
L
G REEN VALLEY RDFERN VALLEY RDRI
O
S
E
C
O
C
T
G
RANITE SPRIN G S D R
FERN VALLEY RDSI
L
V
E
R
S
P
R
I
N
G
S
D
R
S
U
G
A
R
P
I
N
E
PLPUEBLO PLLA MED
IA
R
D
F A L C O N PEAK S T
SIERRA VERDE RD
MISTY RIDGE PL1
1 RANCHETTE PL
VALLEY BE ND S T
H AYFORD RDGOLD RUN DRBULL CA NYO N RD
S ANTA F L OR A RD
PLEASAN
T
O
N
R
D
CO
R
D
O
V
A
D
R
P
A
S
E
O
L
A
D
E
R
A
R O S S IN CT
AL
O
N
D
R
A
C
T
A
L
ONDRA AVENTERTAINMEN T CIR HERI
TAGE RDM A I N ST
M AIN ST
MAIN
S
T
J S
TMAR
INA
P
KW
Y
J S
T
W I L D A U E R STEVERGREEN RDO
R
C
H
A
R
D
H
I
L
L
R
D
C RE S T A VERDE LNVALLEY
VI
S
T
A
R
D
VALLEY
VI
S
T
A
R
DVALLEY
V
IS
TA
WY
NA
N
N
E
T
T
E
S
T
DAV IES D RDAVIES DRHO
B
B
S
S
TEWIN G DR
FAR
R
E
L
S
T
QUIL
A
L
A
N
G
S H E R M A N DR SHERMAN DRVENTERS DRTH O MA SPLDE L A TOBA RD DE LA TOB A R D
H
E
N
D
R
I
X
P
L
EN
GLEM A N C TRAMBUR
S
TTR I D L E P LBR A D LE Y P L
C O O P E R R D
R O B L E S D R
ROBLES DRP
E
R
KI
NS DRLA C H I C A D RH U
M
P
H
R
E
Y
P
LLA CHICA DRW I S E S T
COOPER RDSIE
MPRE STSAN TA R OS A D R
SAN
S
E
B
A
S
T
I
A
N
A
V
SAN
T
A
P
A
U
L
A
D
RSAN TA
R
OS
A
D
R
V A L L E C IT O W
Y
WE
A
V
E
RVIL
LE S
TL ODI STMO UN T MAC CLUR E ST
M
O
N
T
ERA ST
F
I
E
L
D
B
RO
O
K
S
T
C
A
R
N
EROS VAL
L
E
Y
S
T
MONTER A ST SA N TA
R
I
TASA N TA
R
I
TASANTA R
ITA
E PALO
M
A
R
S
T
E PALO
M
A
R
S
T
S
A
N
T
A
M
A
R
I
A
D
R
SA
N
T
A M
A
RIA
DRSANTA OLIV IA R D
1
2
3
4
1 WHITE WING PL2 WILDWOO D C T3 LO ST ARRO W PL4 WILD IRIS PL
MI
S
T
Y
C
R
EE
K C
TSTONE
Y SP
R
IN
GS PL
MI S TY C R EEK CTMISTY CREEK S TMISTY CREEK ST
MOONSTONE PLEAGLE RIDGE PLM
UI
R TRAIL PLSANTA CORA AV VISTA SONRISA AVDEER PE A K C T
RIDGE ROCK CTVI
A
C
A
P
R
I
PEARSON SPRIN G S C THA Y FO R K PL
CA RN ER O S V A L L E Y S T
WEAVERVILLE ST ATHERTON
PL
FI
L
MO
R
E
P
LLA Y T O N V
I
LL
E
P
LBELMONT PL
FIELD
B
R
O
O
K
S
T
ISRAEL CT WE L C H P L
PAPPAS C TTABER DRT
A
B
E
R D
R
1 1 TABER CTPASEO
L
A
D
E
R
A
G IV E N S S T
D A W S O N D R
N
E
W
P
O
R
T
C
T ISO M C T
DAWSON
D
R
D O W NE Y CT
ROUSH DR
2 3
S T E FAS CTH
I
G
G
I
N
S
S
TSTEINER
DR
R
I
G
L
E
Y
S
T
4SULLIVAN C T
KING CREEK WY
NO BL E CANYON RD
K
ING C R EEK CIC O YOTE RIDGE TERCO Y O T E R I DG E LN
CLU
B
H
O
U
S
E
D
R
S GREENSVIEW DRS CREEKSID E D R N CREEKSIDE DRHUNTE PKWY3
LA SS E N P E A K PLQ UI N T O C R E EK PL
1
P INON HILLS RD2MOUNT LANGLEY DR
MCCLOU D R IV E R R D
SANTA PAULA DR5
V
OL
C
A
NO CREEK RDPADDING RIVER RD6
4
MOSS LAN D ING AVMIRROR LAKE PLFO
R
E
S
T
H
I
L
L
P
L7GRASS VAL
LEY
R
D
1 LONE VALLEY RD2 WALNUT GROVE AV3 LOST VALLEY PL4 HONEY LAKE RD5 EDGEWOOD PL6 PORTERVILLE PL7 CANYON CREEK AV
Eme rgAcc
Emerg Acc
e
s
s
2 STEWART CT3 ROUSH CT4 LUCERO CT
MC
C
A
I
N
V
A
L
L
E
Y
C
T
S T R A W B E R R Y C R E E K S T
STRAWBE
R
R
Y
C
R
E
E
K
S
TCAS
CA
D
E
PLBROOK
S
ID
E
P
L
SANTA OLIV IA R D
BARN OW L C T
B E LL F L OW E R C T
M
O
U
N
T OWEN CT
S E BAST OPOL ST
MIL L VALLE Y RDBA T T
LE
C
R
E
E
K
R
DBA R TO N P E A K D R
1 EL MODENA RD
1UK
I
AH STWOLFS HILL RDMI LL V AL L E Y R D
BA
T
T
L
E
C
R
E
E
K
R
D
S H E E P R A N C H L O O PS H E E P R A N C H L O O PK N IG H T S F E R R Y D R
M E E K S B A Y D R
PE
T
A
L
U
M
A
D
R
H
A
R
R
I
L
S
M
I
L
L
A
V
LA
G
R
A
N
G
E
R
D
PO
TTER VALLEY DR
W
EBE
R CREEK RD
EME
R
Y
V
I
L
L
E
C
T
8
W H E A T VILLE ST8 TARUP CREEK RD
O
L
D TRAIL DRS A N TA A N I TA C TSANTA C LA R A C T HUNTE PKWYEL G R ANADA RDSANTA M A R IA CTE L P OR TAL DREL
P
O
R
TAL D
R
S A N T A B A R B A R A C T
S A N TA A N G E LA C T
LO S ALTOS DR
SANT A THERESA PL
MONTE C I T O R D
L
O
S A
L
TOS DRSOUTH T R A IL CTTU
R
NING
TRAIL RD
SU
NRISE TRAIL PLVIEW TRAIL CT
NEW TRAIL W YSCENIC TRAIL PLOLD TRAIL DRHIGH
T
R
A
I
L
C
T
C ROO KED TRAIL RD
NO RTH TR AIL C T
MIGUEL TRAIL P L
TR AI L MA R KE R P LCROOKED TRA IL R D
PI
N
T
O
C
A
N
Y
O
N
L
NSE C R E T C AN Y O N PLCACTUS TRAIL LNLIGHTNING TRAIL LNMEADOWS TRAIL LNR O C K H O U S E T R A I L L NMO O N LI G H T T R A I L L NBOW WILLOW TRAIL WYBO
W
W
ILLO
W TRAIL WY
PA
RADISE TRAIL RD
NOBLE CANYON RD
SI
L
V
E
R
S
A
G
E
R
DGRANITE SPRINGS DRPOPLAR S
P
R
I
NG RDN C
R
E
E
KSI
DE DRGR AN ITE SPR IN GS DR
S CR
EEK
SIDE D
RBENT TRAIL D R
ROCKING HORSE DRBENT
TRA
I
L
DR
D U N C A N R A N C H R DVALLEYCREEK D R
NORTHBROOK AVWI
L
MI
NGTON DRD U N C A N R A N C H R D
M A G N OL IA P OINT CT CHAP E L H IL L D R
PR O CTO R VALLEY RD
N FOX RUN PLN C OMPASS CIR
CROOK ED P
A
TH PLDUN
C
A
N RANCH RDS FOX
R
U
N
P
L
D
O
VE
C
RE
ST PL
S C
O
M
P
A
S
S
C
I
RSH
ADOW RID
G
E PL
EU RE KA
P
L FI
RE
BA
UG
H
PL
H
A
R
R
I
L
S
M
I
L
L
A
V
H
E
RITA
G
E R
D
OLYMP IC P K
W
Y
MO
UNT MIG
UEL RD
CO
R
T
E
T
R
O
V
A
PLAZ
A
C
A
LIM
A
R
P
L
A
Z
A
C
A
L
I
M
A
RPLAZA TOLUCACORTE GOLETA
CORTE VENTURA
PL
A
Z
A
T
O
L
U
C
A
H A R O L D P LG
I
R
A
R
D
C
T
H
U
N
T
E
P
K
W
Y
F
E
N
TON STB
RY
C
E
C
A
N
Y
O
N
A
VYOSEMITE DRWI
N
D CAVE PLTA BL E R O C K A V
ST
O
N
E
G
A
T
E
S
T
YO S E MI TE D R
TABLE ROCK AV
OLYMPIC VISTA RDG
E
I
G
E
R
C
R
E
E
K
C
T
LOST CR
EEK RD
OLD JANAL RANCH R
DOLD
J
ANAL RANCH RDRA
M
B
L
I
N
G
V
I
S
T
A
R
DLO N G V
IE
W
D
RSI
LV
E
R
H
A
WK
WY
OLD JANAL RANCH RD
BLUE SAGE WYLA KE C R ES T D R
CLU
B
CO U NT RYCI
R
MO UN T M I G U EL RD
CA
L
L
E
L
A
M
A
R
I
N
A CALLE LA QUINTAPASEO VERACRUZPL
A
Z
A CAMBRIAPL A Z A E V A
CA
L
L
E
L
A
Q
U
I
N
T
A
PA
S
E
O
L
O
S
G
A
T
O
S
BL U E R I D G E D R
AS
P
E
N
G
L
E
N
R
D
N O R T H W O O D S D RWO O D S D RAS P E N G LE N R D
WOOD
S D
R
ST
O
N
E
G
AT
E
S
T
DUNCAN RAN
CH RD
WH
I
T
E
A
L
D
E
R
A
V
M
O
U
N
T
A
I
N
A
S
H
R
D
HAWTHOR
NE
C
R
E
EK
D
R
WO O D S D R
HA
W
TH
OR
NE CREEK DR
RUSTIC WO O D ST
J OSHUA CREEK RD
SADLERS CREEK R
D
BL U E R I DGE CT
A LD E R G R OVE WYASPEN GLEN CT1 GATE FIFTEEN PL2 GATE FOURTEEN PL
2
1
3
4
5
5 GATE ELEVEN PL4 GATE TWELVE PL3 GATE THIRTEEN PL
6
7 8
9AD I R O N D AC K PLG AT E S I X P L
G
A
T
E
F
I
V
E
P
L
10
6 GATE TEN PL7 GATE NINE PL8 GATE EIGHT PL
10 GATE FOUR PL9 GATE SEVEN PL
GATE THREE PL
G
AT
E
T
WO
P
L
G
A
T
E
O
N
E
P
L
MU
L
B
E
R
R
Y
W
Y
JOSHUA CREE
K PLSA DLE R S CR E EK W Y
N O R T H W OODS DRIRON HORSE PLHAWKSVIEW PLTRAIL
HEAD PLYO
S
E
MI
T
E
W
Y
TA
B
L
E
R
O
C
K
W
YWYBR Y C E C A N YO N
O
L
Y
M
P
I
C
V
I
S
T
A
R
DMA R B L E C A N Y O N W Y
MA
R
B
L
E
C
A
N
Y
O
N
W
YHORN CANYON AVYELLOWSTONE AVBL A C K S T O N E A VRED ROCK CANYON RD AG A TE C R E E K W YCANOE CREEK WYNETTLE CREEK WYR
A
MB
L
I
N
G
V
I
ST
A
R
D
LA KE C R ES T D R
LAKE C
RES
T
D
R
R
A
M
B
L
I
N
G
V
I
S
T
A
R
D
R E D R O C K CANY
ON RDBL U E
S
A
G
E
W
Y
1
2
S E C H O R I D G E W Y
N E CHO RIDGE WY
E CH O R IDGE T ER
LAKE CREST CT45
REZKO WY
L
A
M
E
D
I
A
R
DGL EN D O R A
D
RWI
N
D
C
H
IM
E
D
RED G E H
I
L
L
D
RH E AT H E R W O O D
A
VO A K P O
I
N
T
A
VBL A
I
R
W
O
O
D
A
VTR A
I
L
WO
O
D
A
VR AV
I
N
A
D
RTR A
I
L
WO
O
D
A
VSOLAN
O
D
RSANTA VEN
E
TI
A
S
T
HILLS B O R O U G H S T
L O K O YA DRED G E H I LL D R
VI
E
W
P
A
R
K
W
Y
WO
O
D
W
I
N
D
S
T HEATHERWOO D AVBE
L
L
A
G
I
O
S
T
V IEW PARK WYS A N A N S E L M O S TBR A DB U R
Y
D
R
L
OK
OYA DR
MA G D A L E N A
AVMA G D A L E N A AVVE N D O L A D R
S A N TA VE NETIA ST
SA
N
P
A
S
Q
U
A
L
S
T
LA MED IA R D
BIR
C
H
R
D
C
O
B
B
L
E
C
R
E
E
K
S
T H U N T E R S P O I N T E A VH U N T E R S G L EN A VG LE N WO O D S P R I N G S A VBE D FO R D AV
WE
L
L
B
R
O
O
K
S
TMA G D A L E N A AVSA N T A E L I SA B E T H A V
SUTTER BUTTES ST
VIEW PARK WYE
P
A
L
O
M
A
R
S
T OLYMP IC P KW YJA ME S T O W N
D
R
P A R K E R M O U N T A IN R D
SPARR
O
W
L
A
K
E
R
D
M O U N T W H IT N E Y C T
ST
O
N
E
G
A
T
E
C
T
ME
R
C
E
D
R
I
V
E
R
R
D
RED G
R
A
N
I
T
E
R
D
M E R C E D R IVER RD
SANTA SIERRA DRCO U N
T
RY
S
I
D
E
P
LWINDM
ILL PL
S A N T A S IERRA CTFO X
TA
I
L
C
A
N
YO
N
D
R
2
3
1
1 ZAC CANYON PL2 LIBERTY CREEK PL3 BERRY CREEK PLSANTA CAR
INA
RD
C
H
A
N
C
E MOUNTAI
N PLMO
U
N
T
D
A
N
A
D
R
MOUNT W H I T N E Y R D
RED G R A N IT E RD AUTUMN HI
LLS DRSANTA SI
ERRA DRCEDAR AV AV MARAC
O
R
T
E
C
A
L
Y
P
S
OCAL
L
E LA M
ARINA
PL
A
Z
A
L
O
S
O
S
O
S
O L Y M P IC PKW YOLYMP IC P KW Y
2 SAWGRASS PL3 FOUNTAIN GROVE PL4 PLUMAS PINES PL
1 FEATHER RIVER PLPLAZA KA
D
IE
C
I
R
C
U
L
O
C
O
R
O
N
A
D
O
CORTE CA ST IL LOCORTE CONDESASHENA
N
D
O
A
H DRSU T TE R R ID G E D R
S
UT
TER RIDGE DR SHENANDOAH DRSU
T
T
E
R
R
I
D
G
E
W
Y
SU
T
T
E
R
R
I
D
G
E
C
TCA
MP
H
O
R
C
TSI L
V
E
R
O
AK
CT
SI
L
V
E
R
O
A
K
P
L
A
D
I
R
O
N
D
A
C
K
P
LCH ES AP EA K E CT
CHESAPEA
KE PL
2 ECHO RIDGE CT1 ECHO RIDGE PL
4 STERLING RIDGE CT5 SHADOW CREST CT
SUNRI
S
E CREST CTS P A R A D I S E R I D G E W YLAK E V I
E
W C
T
6
6 FALLING WATERS CTPALMETTO CTHAWKS BLUFF CTPARADISE RIDGE CTN
P
A
R
A
D
I
S
E
R
I
D
G
E
W
Y
E
A
ST
L
A
K
E P
K
W
Y
OLYMPIC PKW Y
H
U
N
T
E
P
K
W
Y
EV
E
N
IN
G
S
T
A
R
S
T
EV
E
N
I
N
G
S
T
A
R
S
T
H
I
D
D
EN PATH DR
W IND IN G W A L K STEASTLAKE PKWYEX P L O R A T
I
O
N
F
A
LL
S
D
R
EX
P
L
O
R
A
T
I
O
N
F
A
L
L
S
D
R
LI
T
T
L
E
L
A
K
E S
T
V
A
L
L
E
J
O
M
I
L
L
S
S
TWOO
D
E
N
V
A
L
LE
Y ST
PO LO PE A K D R
M OUNT BULLION DRTENAYA LA
K
E
R
D
W E E PI N G WI LL O W R D
B EA R VA L LE Y R D
PR
E
S
C
O
T
T
D
R
1
1 FOXTAIL PINES DR
NETTLE CRE E K CT
LY
T
T
O
N
C
R
E
E
K
C
TSAVANNAH C T
S
AVANNA H C TLONE OAK PLCHARLESTON PLDURHAM P
L
3 451
6SILVERADO DRSILVERADO DRGREEN RIVER DRGROVE PARK PLSUN V A L L E Y R D
ANNA D A L E W Y
3
THUNDERBIRD PLOR O CTRIVIERA W Y
PIN
E
H
U
R
S
T
R
D
4 C AL LE C IMA B EL LA5 C MTO B EL LA R OS A
2 C MTO L AS O LA S3 C AL LE C IE LA V IS TA
1
2
3
4
5
1 C MTO C A NT EB RI A
C M T O N O GA
L
E
S
CMTO
A
L
E
G
R
E
CMTO
A
L
I
C
I
A
CMTO
SI
E
N
A
CMTO LIN A R E S
CMTO
C
U
M
B
R
E
S
MANDEV I LL E D R
CA
S
A
B
L
A
N
C
A
C
TCASA
L
OMA CTCA
S
A
V
E
R
D
E
C
T
CO RT E
H
E
LEN
A
AVCO R TE
H
E
L
EN
A
AVDEL PRADO S T
1 HEATHER CANYON CT
1
2 DENISE CANYON CT
2
OLD TELEGRAPH CANY O N R DVI A R O MA Y AKA P
LA
N
WYMA N Y A C I
M A R B E LL A CT
MA R BE LLA P LMO N
T
E
R
E
Y
C
T
1 BREWSTER BAY DR
1
HA
L
L
E
Y
C
T
SU
N
D
R
O
P
C
T
EQ
U
I
N
O
X
W
Y
HE RITAG E RDOT
A
Y
V
A
L
L
E
Y RDVISTA SANTA RITA
1
12
3
VISTA SANTA MARGARITA3VISTA SAN JOSE2
VI S T A S A N L U C A S
AVEN IDA DE LAS VISTA
S
V I S TA S AN J
A
VI
ERVISTA SAN BENITOVISTA SAN RAF
A
E
L
VIS
TA SA
N SI
M
E
ON
VISTA S A N J U A N IC O
VISTA SAN JAVIERAV
E
NID
A D
E LAS VISTAS
V
I
ST
A SA
N GUADALUPEVISTA SA N PEDRO MARTIRVI S TA S A N IG N A C I O
VISTA SANTA CAT A R IN A
VI STA S A NTA I N ES
1
1
VI
S
T
A
S
A
N
I
S
I
D
R
OVISTA SAN MATIAS2
2
VI STA S A N PA BL O
VI
S
T
A SAN FRANCISQUI
AVENIDA DE LAS VISTAS
V
IS
TA S
A
N
T
O
DOMINGO1
1
2
2
3 VI STA S A N RU F OVI STA S A N CA R LO S
VI STA S A NTA C LA R A3
VISTA SANTO TOMASVISTA SANTA ROSALIAPAL M AV O C EAN H IL L S PK WYDENN ERY R D
RE D SAILS WYO FF SH O R E P T
R
E
G
A
T
T
A
L
N MARSH HARBOR DRSEA TERN C T
1
1 CA ST LE I SLA N D C V
SEA ISLE DRRED CORAL
L
N
B LA C K C O R A L C TDAY S A I LO R CT
ISLAND BRE E Z E L N FATHOM CTS E A L A V E N D E R W Y BL A C K C O R A L LN
D
E
N
N
E
R
Y
R
D
W H E E L H O U S E D R
R
O
Y
A
L I
S
L
A
N
D
W
Y
FA
L
C
O
N
H
U
R
S
T
T
E
R
ESSIN G T O N CTHEATHBROOK CTK
E
NTM
E
R
E
TERGOLDE
N SANDS PL
EB
B
T
I
D
E
P
L
LY N D H U R ST T E RCA MB E R LY C T
1
1
2
2BA RD SL EY C TSI LVE R S HO A LS P T
OCEAN HILLS P
K
W
Y
S E A D R I F T W Y
S T A R F IS H W Y
SE
A
F
I
E
L
D
P
L
S E A R E E F P LSE A R E E F D R
CO
V
E
V
I
E
W
P
L
S URFSIDE DR SURFWOOD LNC O V E V IE W W YSURF CREST DRSEA ROBIN CTSEA WATER LNSE A UR C HI N D RSEA BIRD W Y
SUR
F C
REST DRSEAGLEN W
Y
SAND DRIFT PTBREAKERS WYDENNERY RDMI
DDLE FORK PLSC E N I C T ER R A C E P LHUNTERS RID
G
E P
L SUNSET RIDGE PLWI
N
D
R
I
V
E
R
R
DTR
I
S
T
A
N
R
I
V
E
R
R
DKL
AMATH DRWARM S
P
R
I
N
GS RDS P R I NG S K Y S TFI R ST
ST
A
R
D
RVO YA GE
DR
KE
S
T
R
E
L
F
A
L
L
S
R
DGA RN E T
FAL
LS
D
RWHISPER DR1
MEA
N
D
E
R
R
D SH UT TE R
C
TC R
I
C
K
E
T
D
R
HO
N
E
Y
B
E
E
S
T
1 AVOCET CT
PI
C
N
I
C
C
TMORNING ST
A
R DR
F
A
L
LI
NG STAR DRAR
B
O
R
V
I
E
W
S
T WI
N
D
I
N
G
WA
L
K
S
T
WIN
D
I
N
G
W
A
L
K
W
Y
TREE H O U S E ST
PO
R
C
H
S
W
I
N
G
S
T
H
O
P
S
C
O
T
C
H
D
R WISHING STAR WYW
I
S
H
I
N
G
S
T
A
R
D
RST AR G A Z E
W
YST A R G A Z E D R
C
O
P
P
E
R
P
E
N
N
Y
D
R
Q
U
I
E
T
T
R
A
I
L
D
RHI K E R S T RA I L
WY Q UI E T T R AI L
W
Y
PI
C
K
E
T
F
E
N
C
E
D
RST AM PE D E W Y
MINER CREEK LN
PLATTE RIVE R LN G O RG E
R
U
N
W
Y
G
E
Y
S
E
R
V
I
L
L
E
S
T CMTOCO LO MAMO U N T T A MA L PA I S A VHILLSBOR O U GH S TTU S C AN S P R IN G S A VG O L D E N G A T E A V
1 ZAMORA CT
2
1 3 ORINDA CT2 CASTAIC CT3
CALLE FERNANDOAV E NI D A A N TO N I OAVENIDA MANTILLACA
L
L
E
C
A
T
A
R
I
N
A
AVENIDA GABRIEL2
1AVE N ID A MAR LI N A
P
L
A
ZA
P
A
R
AISO
1 CORTE BAUTISTA2 AVENIDA SOLEDAD3 AVENIDA CATARINA
3
CO
R
T
E
S
A
N
S
I
M
E
O
N
C
A
S
T
L
E
W
O
O
D
C
TPLA ZA P ALME R A
CO
R
T
E
A
N
A
C
A
P
AAV BELTERRAHUN TE PKWY
WINDIN
G
WALK ST
BIRCH
R
D DISCO
VER
Y
FA
LLS
D
RHIKERS TRAIL DRH
I
K
E
R
S
T
R
A
I
L
D
R
COPPER PENNY DRC R O S S R O A D S S TCROSSROADS STSU MM ER S K Y S T
SW
E
E
T
S
A
G
E
S
T
STA
R
L
I
G
H
T
C
TTWILIGHT STM O RNING STAR DR
COPPER PENNY DRQ U I E T T R A I L D RPI C K E T F E N C E D R
SW
EET SAGE ST
TANBARK ST
COUNTY OFSAN DIEGO
COUNTY OFSAN DIEGO
CITY ofSAN DIEGO
NATIONAL CITY
IMPERIAL BEACH
COUNTY OFSAN DIEGO
CITY ofSAN DIEGO
Canyon Plaza
Fire Station
Post
Office
Chula Vista Adult
Del Rey Adult
Bayside Park
Rohr Park
Terra Nova Plaza
Library
Bonita Point
Sout hwesternSatellite School
Sout hwesternCollege
FS
FS
KaiserMedicalCenterMissionaryChurch
Eastlake Country Club
CoveredReservoir
EastlakeCountryClub
EastlakeCountryClub EastlakeCountry Club
Dolphin Beach Club
Ea stlakeCo untry C lub
OlympicTrainingCenter
OlympicTrainingCenter
OlympicTrainingCenter
EastLakeVillageCenter
Sout hwesternCollege
Church of LatterDay Saint s
Telecenter
Corpus Christ i Catholic Church
MarbrisasApartments
First U
nit
e
d
Method
i
st
C
h
urc
h
MarbrisasApartments
BonitaCountryDay School
Bonita Golf Course
AnimalShelter
Otay Disposal Site
Point Ro binhoodTe nnis C ourt s
Vista HillHospital
EvangelicalFree Churchof Chula Vista
Rancho Del Rey Plaza
EmploymentDevelopmentDept.
FireStation
Chula VistaMunicipalGolf Course
Chula VistaMunicipalGolf Course
PostO
ffi
c
e
Library
Bonita ValleyBapt ist Church
Bit ofHeaven
Bo
n
it
a
P
r
e
s
b
y
t
eri
a
n
C
h
u
r
c
hKinde
r
ca
r
e
WesleyanChurch
CountyAnimalShelter
Praise Chapel Bra ndyw ineApar tmen tsBoy
s
&
G
i
r
l
s
C
lub
Park HillUnitedMethodistChurchBa
y
vi
e
w
O
rt
h
o
d
o
x
Pre
s
b
y
t
e
ri
a
n
C
h
u
r
c
h
Elks Lodge
Chula VistaAlliance ChurchApartments
Apartments
WaterStorage
Chula VistaMunicipalGolf Course
Chula VistaMunicipalGolf Course Bonita Center
Sentry Mini StorageBox-it Mobile S torage
Lincoln Business Center
Churchof GodinChrist
Orange Ave.Ballfields
East O rangeVillage ApartmentsFi
r
e
S
t
a
t
io
n
Pa
l
o
m
a
r
S
t
r
e
e
t
C
h
u
r
c
h
of
C
h
ri
st Bi
b
l
e
B
ap
t
i
s
tCh u
r
ch
o
fCh u
l
a
V
is
ta
Concordia Lutheran C hurch
Bayview
B
a
pti
st
C
h
ur
c
h
Terra Nova Villas Apartments
Jehovah'sWitnesses
Open Space
Chula VistaCommunityChurch
Glen AbbeyCemetary
VillaBonita
Church of Jesus ChristLatter DaySaints
KaiserMedicalCenter
Don LuisMobile EstatesOtay B aptistChurch
Ou r La dy ofGu adal upeCat ho li c C hu rc h
Chu rc hand Pre -Scho ol
Park Palomar Apartments
Don LuisMobile Estates
Sp
a
ni
s
h
Fa
i
t
h
C
e
nt
e
r
Tabernacle ofChula Vista
St Pious XCatholic C hurch
Cas
tl
e
P
a
r
k
Asse
m
bl
y
of
Go
d
C
h
u
r
c
h
San DiegoCountry ClubGolf Course
St Pious X
CatholicChurch
FirstPresbyter ianChurch ofChula Vista
FireStation
HilltopBaptistChurch
St. John'sEpiscopalChurch
St. John'sSchool
Chu
r
c
h
of
J
e
s
u
s
Chri
st
of
L
at
t
e
r
Day
S
ai
nt
s
St. Mark's Evagelical Lutheran Church
Fi
r
st
Ch
ur
c
h
of
C
h
ri
s
t
Sc
i
e
nt
i
s
t
Calvary ChristianAcademy
Calvary BaptistChurch
Plaza Bonita
Eucalypt us Grove
Thunderbird Mobile Home Park
SummitContinuationSchool
SouthChula VistaLibraryThe
C
ou
n
t
yChu
r
c
h
o
f
t
heFul
l
G
o
s
p
e
l
Church of the Most Pr ecious Blood
Re
or
g
a
n
i
z
e
d
C
h
u
r
c
h
of
J
e
s
u
s
C
hri
st
of
L
D
S
,
S
c
h
o
ol
&
C
h
u
r
c
h
San DiegoCountry ClubGolf Course
Southwestern
C
hri
sti
a
n
School
Church of Chri
st
Chula Vista
Nazarene
Christian
School &
Church
Chula Vista Communit y Youth Center
PostOffice
Courthouse
Ma
s
o
ni
c
Te
m
p
l
e
Women'
s
Cl
u
b
'
Park Paza
Telecenter
St. Rose of LimaCatholic Church& School
First Christian C hur ch of C hula Vista
Ch
ur
c
hFir
s
tSout
h
e
rnBapt
i
s
t
Chu
r
c
h
Templ
e
B
et
h
Sho
l
o
m
Syna
g
o
g
u
eCo mmu n
i
t
yCo n
g
reg
a
t
i
o
na
lCh u
r
c
h
Courthouse
Eucalypt us Grove
Eucalypt us Grove
KOACampground
Lincoln South City Business Center
Price Club Plaza
South BayCommunityChapel
Palomar Tr olley C enter
PalomarStreet Park & Ride
Palomar StreetTrolley Station
South BayChurch of C hrist
World Harvest C hurch
South Bay
Baptist C
h
ur
c
h
SDG &E
Calvary Chapel
Chula Vista Center
ScrippsMemorialHospitalChurchC
h
u
r
c
h
of
G
o
d
of
C
h
ul
a
V
i
st
a
Civic CenterFi
re
S
ta
t
ion
S
u
m
m
i
t
Co
n
t
i
n
u
a
t
i
o
n
S
c
h
o
o
l
PoliceStation
Fi
li
pi
n
o
&
A
m
eri
c
a
n
Bi
bl
e
B
a
p
t
i
s
t C
h
ur
c
h
R
o
se
A
rbo
rMobil
e
Home
Pa
rk
Terry's Broadw
a
y
P
ar
k
Civic Center Library
Se
v
e
n
t
h
D
a
yAd
ve
n
t
is
t
C
h
u
rch
Pi
lg
r
imEv an
g
e
l
i
ca
lLut
h
e
r
an
Ch
u
rc
h
PilgrimLutheranSchool
Ch
ri
s
ti
a
n
Ac
a
d
e
m
y
o
f
Ch
ul
a
V
i
s
t
a So u
t
h
e
rnCh
r
i
s
t
i
anAc
a
d
e
m
y
Church
DMV
Target
South BayMarketplace
South BayMarketplace
Wee CarePre-School
Sweetwat erTown & Country
Western Salt Company
Western Salt Company
SDG&E
SDG&E
SDG&E
ChulaVistaHarbor
Rohr Industr ies
ChulaVistaMarina
Rohr Industr ies
Chula VistaPublic WorksYard
Chula Vista Nature Interpretive Cent er
Hacienda Mobile Estates
Fabulous Caliente's5-10 Mobile RanchRa nc ho B on i taMob il e H ome Pa rkG ran d aMo bi l eEs t at e sTw in Pa lm sMob il e H ome P a rkPalm MobileEstatesPalm Mobile E states
Pacific G
ar
d
e
n
s
Mobile Home
P
ar
k
Bre
n
t
w
o
o
d
Trai
l
e
r
P
a
r
k
B ren twood Trailer ParkTerr
y
'
s
Mo
b
i
le
P
a
r
kTerr
y
'
s
Mo
b
i
le
P
a
r
k
C
ab
r
i
l
lo
Mo
b
i
le
Lo
d
g
eJade Ba
y
Mobil
e
Lo
dge
Bayscene Trailer Park
Touris
t
C
en
te
rPar
k
&
R
i
de
E Street
TrolleyStation
Vi
s
it
o
rIn
f
or
m
at
i
o
n
C
e
n
t
er
CV Mobile
Home Park
Windward Point Apartments Apartments
Otay RanchHigh School
EastlakeVillageCenterNorth
Sunset View Park
OTAY LAKES RD
HUNTE PKWYH
UN
TE P
K
W
YEASTLAKE PKWYLANE AVF E NTON STE A S T L A K E PKWYEASTLA
K
E
D
R
EA
S
T
L
A
K
E
D
R E H STP R O C T O R VA LLEY RD
P RO C T O R VA LL EY RD
LANE AVOTAY LAKES RD
O TAY LAKES RD OTAY LAKES RDRUTGERS AVCORRAL CANYON RDE H S TOTAY LAKES RDRIDGEBACK R D
BUENA VISTA WY
COR
RAL CA
N
Y
O
N R
D
CORRAL CANYON RD
BONITA RDBO NITA RDOTA
Y
L
A
K
E
S
R
D
OTAY LAKES R
D
AVENIDA DEL REYN RANCH
O
D
E
L
R
E
Y
P
K
W
Y
E H STPASEO RANCH
E
R
O
S
R
ANCHO DEL REY P K W YS R AN C H O D E L REY PKWYE H ST DEL REY BLT E R R A N O V A D R N RANCHO DEL REY PKWYE J ST PASEO RANCHEROTELEGRAPH CANYON RDBUENA VISTA WYB
UENA VI
STA WYT E L E G R A P H C A N Y O N R DPASEO LADERAE
J
S
T
P
A
S
E
O
D
E
L REYE J ST
TELEGRAPH CANYON RD
E NAPLES S
T
OLEANDER AV
MELR
O
S
E
AVNACION
AVOLEANDER AVNACION AVE ORANGE
AV
BRANDYWINE AVM
E
L
R
OSE AVOLEANDER AVBRANDYWINE AVB O N IT A R D BONITA RDPLA
Z
A
B
O
N
I
T
A
R
D
BONITA RD
E ST
C S T
E ST F S T
E ST
THIRD
AVSECOND AV
THIRD AV
E 30TH ST
HI
GHLAND AVN SECOND AVC ST
D ST
C S T N FOURTH
AVFOURTH AV
F S T
F S T
G S TBROADWAYWOODLAW N
AVFIFTH
AVFOURTH AVTHI
RD AVFIRST
AVSECOND AV
G ST
F ST HILLTOP
DR
H ST
E H S T
I ST
J STI ST
H S T
THIRD
AVFIRST
AVFIRST
AVTHI
RD AVHI
LLTOP DRSECOND AVK ST
L S T
FOURTH AVTHI
RD AVL ST
M O S S S T
MOSS ST
J ST
J ST
K S T
K S T I ST
FIFTH
AVFOURTH AVBROADWAYE J ST
E H ST
N
A
C
I
ON AVE J ST
TELEGRAPH
C
A
N
Y
O
N
R
D E L STE L ST MELROSE AVHILLTOP
DR
E OXFORD
S
T
E N A P L E S S T MELROSE AVHI
LLTOP DRHILLTOP
DR
E PALOMAR
S
T
E ORANGE AVHI
LLTOP DRORANGE AV
HILLTOP DRM AI N STMAIN S TMAIN S T
F
O
URTH AV
B
E
Y
E
R
W
Y
B
E
Y
ER
W
YBROADWAYBROADWAYTHIRD AVFOURTH AVORANG
E
A
V
MAIN ST
BEYER
B
L
BEYER BLPALOMAR ST
I
NDUSTRI
AL BLBROADWAYO X F O R D S T
P A L O M A R S T
N A P L E S S T
BAY BLI
NDUSTRI
AL BLL STBAY BLBROADWAYMARI
NA PKWYH S T
I ST
E S T
G ST
L A G O O N D R
FI
FTH AVMARINA PKWYBAY B
L
H ST
FOURTH AVTHIRD
AVFOURTH AV
PALOMAR S
T NACI
ON AVE NAPLES S
T
N
A
C
ION AV
E H ST
I
NDUSTRI
AL BLHUNTE
PKWY
E P A L O M A R S T
E PALOMAR ST
L
A
M
E
D
I
A
C L U B H O U SE DR
S
G
R
E
E
N
S
V
I
E
W
D
RN GREENSV IE W D R
E P A L O M A R S T MEDI
CAL CENTER DRO T A Y V A LLEY RDM AIN S T
MAIN ST
HERI
TAGE RDENTERTAINM E N T C IR
ANITA ST
QUINTARD
S
TMARINA
PKWY
J ST
ME
D
I
C
A
L
C
E
N
T
E
R
C
T
O L Y M P I C P K W Y
OLYMPIC PKWYPASEO
RANCHERO
H
E
R
I
T
A
G
E
R
D
OLYMPIC
P
K
W
Y
OLYMPIC PKWY
LA MEDIA5
5
54
805
805
0 1,5 00 3,0 00 4,5 00 6,0 00750
Feet
Plot Dat e:
j:/g is /mx ds/nan cy/bu ilding /urbrur2bb.mxd
Kn ot ts Soa k Cit y &Coor s Amphitheatr e
Fu t ur eUniversityCore
Ba y fr on t(Fu tu reDevelopment)
Fr eeway
Com mercial
Out door Lighting Zon es Map
City of Chula Vista
Fu t ur e
Ea ster n
Urba n
Cen t er
Fu t ur eVillageTownCenter
Fu t ur e
Regi on a l
Tech n ol ogy
Pa rk
In dust ria l
ChulaVistaCrossings
In dust ria l
Fu t ur e Indu str ia l
Fu t ur e Indu str ia l
Ad opt ed Date : Sept emb er 2, 200 5
Sharp Chul a Vi st a Me dical Center
Chula VistaAuto Park
Se p 0 2, 2 005
Legend
Lighting Zone 3: (Urban) State default location as Adopted by the Energy Commission and defined by the 2000 Census
Lighting Zone 2: (Rural) State default location as Adopted by the Energy Commission and defined by the 2000 Census
Lighting Zone 3: (Urban) As Amended by City of Chula Vista Ordinance # 3023
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 237
City of Chula Vista
Staff Report
File#:18-0091, Item#: 5.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ADOPTING A LIST OF
PROJECTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018-19 FUNDED BY SB 1: THE ROAD REPAIR AND
ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 2017 (RMRA)
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Council adopt the resolution.
SUMMARY
Pursuant to the Streets and Highways Code (SHC) Section 2034(a)(1), prior to receiving an
apportionment of RMRA funds from the State Controller in a fiscal year, a city must submit to the
Commission a list of projects proposed to be funded with these funds. Staff is requesting that the
City Council approve the City’s RMRA Project List for Fiscal Year 2018-19.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Environmental Notice
The Project qualifies for a Class 1 Categorical Exemption pursuant to Section 15301 (Existing
Facilities) of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines.
Environmental Determination
The Director of Development Services has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the project qualifies for a Class
1 Categorical Exemption pursuant to Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) of the State CEQA
Guidelines. Thus, no further environmental review is required.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
Not applicable.
DISCUSSION
The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (SB1 Beall) established the Road Maintenance and
Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) which provided new funds to cities and counties throughout California
to use for street maintenance and rehabilitation.
Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA)
The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (SB1 Beall) increases per gallon fuel excise taxes,
diesel fuel sales taxes and vehicle registration taxes, stabilizes the fuel tax rates and provides for
inflationary adjustments to rates in future years.
RMRA local streets and roads allocations are intended to be used to improve the overall condition of
the municipality’s pavement condition. Once an average Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of 80 is
City of Chula Vista Printed on 4/19/2018Page 1 of 3
powered by Legistar™2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 238
File#:18-0091, Item#: 5.
the municipality’s pavement condition. Once an average Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of 80 is
achieved, other transportation related projects could be proposed. The City of Chula Vista’s PCI is
currently 74, but with additional funding associated with Measure P and traditional TransNet funding,
the PCI is anticipated to improve in the coming years. In order to continue to improve the city
average PCI, the proposed project list for FY2018-19 consists of critical arterial and collector streets
with low PCI (Attachment 1). This complements the improvements being made to residential streets
with the Measure P funding.
Required Annual Authorization
The RMRA has specific reporting requirements specifically, “prior to receiving RMRA funds in a fiscal
year, a city or county must submit to the California Transportation Commission (CTC) a project list
pursuant to an adopted budget. The list must include for each project: description, location,
schedule and useful life.” The list along with a Council resolution of approval is due to the CTC by
May 1, 2018.
The RMRA estimate for FY2018-19 is $4,492,748 which will be programmed with the upcoming
adoption of the City’s FY2018-19 CIP Program. As mentioned, the RMRA project list for FY2018-19
consists of critical arterial and collector streets and is included as Attachment 1.
The RMRA also requires that cities and counties submit an annual report of project completion for
projects funded by the RMRA. The annual report will provide details on the projects completed to
date and any updates to the original listing.
Maintenance of Effort: RMRA [Streets and Highways Code Sec. 2036]
The RMRA contains a local agency maintenance of effort (MOE) requirement that applies to funds
allocated through the RMRA. Similar to the existing requirements for the Gas Tax and TransNet, the
MOE requirement ensures that these new funds do not supplant existing levels of city and county
general revenue spending on streets and roads. For RMRA, cities and counties must maintain
general fund spending for street, road, and highway purposes at no less than the average of 2009-
10, 2010-11, and 2011-12 fiscal years, excluding one-time funds. The RMRA MOE for Chula Vista is
$4,515,412 (Attachment 2). The City anticipates meeting the MOE requirement for FY2018-19.
The State Controller may perform audits to ensure compliance with these MOE rules. If the State
Controller determines that a city or county has not met its’ MOE, the agency will be required to
reimburse the state for the funds it received during that fiscal year, although the agency may expend
during that fiscal year and the following fiscal year a total amount that is sufficient to comply. Any
funds withheld or returned as a result of a failure to comply will be reapportioned to the other counties
and cities whose expenditures are in compliance.
Due to this requirement, a separate account has been established for RMRA within the Gas Tax fund.
DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT
Staff has reviewed the property holdings of the City Council members and has found no property
holdings within 500 feet of the boundaries of the property which is the subject of this action.
Consequently, this item does not present a disqualifying real property-related financial conflict of
interest under California Code of Regulations Title 2, section 18702.2(a)(11), for purposes of the
City of Chula Vista Printed on 4/19/2018Page 2 of 3
powered by Legistar™2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 239
File#:18-0091, Item#: 5.
interest under California Code of Regulations Title 2, section 18702.2(a)(11), for purposes of the
Political Reform Act (Cal. Gov’t Code §87100,et seq.).
Staff is not independently aware, and has not been informed by any City Council member, of any
other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter.
LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS
The City’s Strategic Plan has five major goals: Operational Excellence, Economic Vitality, Healthy
Community, Strong and Secure Neighborhoods and a Connected Community. The goal of the RMRA
Major Pavement Rehabilitation project is to support the Strong and Secure Neighborhood strategy
identified in the City’s Strategic Plan. The maintenance and rehabilitation of public infrastructure is a
key City function in providing a safe and efficient roadway system for residents, businesses and
visitors alike.
CURRENT YEAR FISCAL IMPACT
The RMRA allocations are distributed on a monthly basis beginning on January 1, 2018. Funding of
$4,492,748 will be programmed as part of the FY2018-19 CIP Program.
ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT
Upon completion of the project, the improvements will require only routine City street maintenance.
Since the improvements are anticipated to increase the life of the streets included, there should be a
positive long term fiscal impact.
ATTACHMENTS
1. RMRA Project List for Fiscal Year 2018-19
2. RMRA MOE FY10,11,12
Staff Contact: Patrick Moneda, Senior Civil Engineer
City of Chula Vista Printed on 4/19/2018Page 3 of 3
powered by Legistar™2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 240
ATTACHMENT 1
1 OF 2
PROJECT NAME: RMRA Major Pavement Rehabilitation – FY2017/18 (STM395)
(IN PROGRESS)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Project includes street overlays and street reconstruction on various streets in
the City. The major rehabilitation treatments are based on the
recommendations of the City’s Pavement Management System.
PROPOSED SCHEDULE: Construction 06/2018 – 12/2018
EST. USEFUL LIFE: This Project is estimated to extend the useful life of the pavement a minimum of
20 years.
PROJECT LOCATION: ROAD MAINTENANCE AND REHABILITATION (RMRA) STREET LIST
Road Name Begin Location End Location
Functional
Classification
PCI
(2018)
FISCAL
YEAR
E PALOMAR ST HILLTOP DR MELROSE AV Collector 19 FY17/18
BAY BL I-5 FREEWAY RAMP PALOMAR ST Collector 27 FY17/18
MOSS ST FOURTH AV THIRD AV Collector 31 FY17/18
C ST N GLOVER AV SECOND AV Collector 33 FY17/18
JURISTICTION AVERAGE NETWORK PCI: 74 as of 3/28/2018
PROJECT LEAD: William S. Valle
Office: (619)409-5976
e-mail: WValle@chulavistaca.gov
SENATE DISTRICT: 40
ASSEMBLY DISTRICT: 79, 80
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 241
ATTACHMENT 1
2 OF 2
PROJECT NAME: RMRA Major Pavement Rehabilitation – FY2018/19 (STM396)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Project includes street overlays and street reconstruction on various streets in
the City. The major rehabilitation treatments are based on the
recommendations of the City’s Pavement Management System.
PROPOSED SCHEDULE: 11/2018 – 09/2019
EST. USEFUL LIFE: This Project is estimated to extend the useful life of the pavement a minimum of
20 years.
PROJECT LOCATION: ROAD MAINTENANCE AND REHABILITATION (RMRA) STREET LIST
Road Name Begin Location End Location
Functional
Classification
PCI
(2018)
FISCAL
YEAR
E NAPLES ST CRESCENT DR MEDICAL CTR DR Collector 37 FY18/19
THIRD AV N FOURTH AV D ST Collector 37 FY18/19
NAPLES ST FOURTH AV THIRD AV Collector 37 FY18/19
OXFORD ST TOBIAS DR HILLTOP DR Collector 37 FY18/19
THIRD AV L ST NAPLES ST Collector 39 FY18/19
F ST FOURTH AV THIRD AV Collector 40 FY18/19
THIRD AV ORANGE AV ANITA ST Collector 39 FY18/19
L ST THIRD AV FIRST AV Collector 41 FY18/19
FIRST AV H ST I ST Collector 43 FY18/19
HILLTOP DR TELEGRAPH CYN RD E L ST Collector 44 FY18/19
I ST SECOND AV HILLTOP DR Collector 46 FY18/19
BONITA RD CITY LIMIT @
WILLOW ST
ALLEN SCHOOL RD Arterial 46 FY18/19
JURISTICTION AVERAGE NETWORK PCI: 74 as of 3/28/2018
PROJECT LEAD: William S. Valle
Office: (619)409-5976
e-mail: WValle@chulavistaca.gov
SENATE DISTRICT: 40
ASSEMBLY DISTRICT: 79, 80
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 242
Maintenance of Effort - General Fund for Streets & Roads - Estimated UnofficialRoad Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account per Streets & Hwys Code Sec 2036 1revised est: 08/07/2017Streets and Roads Annual Report - Reported General Fund for Street PurposesFY2009-10 FY2010-11 FY2011-12Average Adjustment RMRA M.O.E.SAN DIEGO COUNTYCARLSBAD7,768,758 8,643,205 9,484,234 8,632,066 8,632,066CHULA VISTA4,284,581 4,845,643 4,416,013 4,515,412 4,515,412CORONADO1,130,992 1,467,113 1,298,946 1,299,017 1,299,017DEL MAR557,690439,548546,371514,536514,536EL CAJON2,562,928 1,961,6131,710,4082,078,3162,078,316ENCINITAS2,983,335 4,715,3736,504,3484,734,3524,734,352ESCONDIDO5,534,227 4,750,6134,903,8325,062,8915,062,891IMPERIAL BEACH283,836279,745249,164270,915270,915LA MESA2,815,965 3,050,4203,140,4393,002,2753,002,275LEMON GROVE247,142271,524386,339301,668301,668NATIONAL CITY2,073,854 4,280,3611,878,0842,744,1002,744,100OCEANSIDE1,621,465 1,986,7673,064,7572,224,3302,224,330POWAY1,378,976 1,477,7631,309,2121,388,6501,388,650SAN DIEGO32,013,564 34,525,926 23,510,641 30,016,71030,016,710SAN MARCOS5,277,365 5,499,8375,594,7915,457,3315,457,331SANTEE720,361641,629788,451716,814716,814SOLANA BEACH716,800 1,020,641934,373890,605890,605VISTA3,263,167 3,338,1452,712,7903,104,7013,104,701SAN FRANCISCO COUNTSAN FRANCISCO34,060,774 30,858,152 27,153,357 30,690,761 30,690,761SAN JOAQUIN COUNTYESCALON485,821 225,909 238,194 316,641 316,641LATHROP66,760 0 0 22,253 22,253LODI1,129,948 1,382,113 1,063,781 1,191,947 1,191,947MANTECA1,513,358 1,090,716 768,606 1,124,227 1,124,227RIPON263,839(1,523,972)2 087,9462 87,946STOCKTON2,722,388 0(18,097,962)2 907,4632 907,463TRACY367,397671,756433,812490,988490,988SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNARROYO GRANDE1,337,039 1,313,030 1,645,843 1,431,971 1,431,971ATASCADERO117,080 687,596 38,160 280,945 280,945EL PASO DE ROBLES1,263,548 1,317,288 771,728 1,117,521 1,117,521GROVER BEACH0000 0MORRO BAY189,087307,516402,324299,642299,642PISMO BEACH488,414540,340647,868558,874558,874SAN LUIS OBISPO7,398,079 7,549,2759,858,8558,268,7368,268,736 UPDATED 7 August 2017CaliforniaCityFinance.comPage 12 of 17E S T I M A T E D U N O F F I C I A L2018-04-24 Agenda PacketPage 243
RESOLUTION NO. __________
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA ADOPTING A LIST OF PROJECTS FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2018-19 FUNDED BY SB 1: THE ROAD
REPAIR AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 2017 (RMRA)
WHEREAS, Senate Bill 1 (SB 1), the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017
(Chapter 5, Statutes of 2017) was passed by the Legislature and Signed into law by the Governor
in April 2017 in order to address the significant multi-modal transportation funding shortfalls
statewide; and
WHEREAS, SB 1 includes accountability and transparency provisions that will ensure
the residents of our City are aware of the projects proposed for funding in our community and
which projects have been completed each fiscal year; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Streets and Highways Code (SHC) Section 2034(a)(1), the
City must adopt a list of all projects proposed to receive funding from RMRA, created by SB 1
by resolution, which must include a description and the location of each proposed project, a
proposed schedule for the project’s completion, and the estimated useful life of the improvement;
and
WHEREAS, the City will receive an estimated $4,492,748 in RMRA funding in Fiscal
Year 2018-19 from SB 1; and
WHEREAS, this is the second year in which the City is receiving SB 1 funding and will
enable the City to continue essential road maintenance and rehabilitation projects, safety
improvements, repairing and replacing aging bridges, and increasing access and mobility options
for the traveling public that would not have otherwise been possible without SB 1; and
WHEREAS, the City has undergone a robust public process to ensure public input into
our community’s transportation priorities/the project list; and
WHEREAS, the City used a Pavement Management System to develop the SB 1 project
list to ensure revenues are being used on the most high-priority and cost-effective projects that
also meet the community’s priorities for transportation investment; and
WHEREAS, the funding from SB 1 will help the City maintain and rehabilitate twelve
streets/roads throughout the City this year and hundreds of similar projects into the future; and
WHEREAS, the City’s RMRA project list for FY2018-19 consists of critical arterial and
collector streets (Exhibit A); and
WHEREAS, the 2016 California Statewide Local Streets and Roads Needs Assessment
found that the City’s streets and roads are in a “good” condition and this revenue will help City
increase the overall quality of its road system and over the next decade will bring City streets and
roads into a “very-good” condition; and
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 244
WHEREAS, the SB 1 project list and overall investment in our local streets and roads
infrastructure with a focus on basic maintenance and safety, investing in complete streets
infrastructure, and using cutting-edge technology, materials and practices, will have significant
positive co-benefits statewide.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista
that it adopts the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) Project List for Fiscal
Year 2018-19.
Presented by Approved as to form by
William S. Valle Glen R. Googins
Director of Engineering &City Attorney
Capital Projects
EXHIBIT A – RMRA Project List for Fiscal Year 2018-19
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 245
EXHIBIT A
1 OF 2
PROJECT NAME: RMRA Major Pavement Rehabilitation – FY2017/18 (STM395)
(IN PROGRESS)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Project includes street overlays and street reconstruction on various streets in
the City. The major rehabilitation treatments are based on the
recommendations of the City’s Pavement Management System.
PROPOSED SCHEDULE: Construction 06/2018 – 12/2018
EST. USEFUL LIFE: This Project is estimated to extend the useful life of the pavement a minimum of
20 years.
PROJECT LOCATION: ROAD MAINTENANCE AND REHABILITATION (RMRA) STREET LIST
Road Name Begin Location End Location
Functional
Classification
PCI
(2018)
FISCAL
YEAR
E PALOMAR ST HILLTOP DR MELROSE AV Collector 19 FY17/18
BAY BL I-5 FREEWAY RAMP PALOMAR ST Collector 27 FY17/18
MOSS ST FOURTH AV THIRD AV Collector 31 FY17/18
C ST N GLOVER AV SECOND AV Collector 33 FY17/18
JURISTICTION AVERAGE NETWORK PCI: 74 as of 3/28/2018
PROJECT LEAD: William S. Valle
Office: (619)409-5976
e-mail: WValle@chulavistaca.gov
SENATE DISTRICT: 40
ASSEMBLY DISTRICT: 79, 80
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 246
EXHIBIT A
2 OF 2
PROJECT NAME: RMRA Major Pavement Rehabilitation – FY2018/19 (STM396)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Project includes street overlays and street reconstruction on various streets in
the City. The major rehabilitation treatments are based on the
recommendations of the City’s Pavement Management System.
PROPOSED SCHEDULE: 11/2018 – 09/2019
EST. USEFUL LIFE: This Project is estimated to extend the useful life of the pavement a minimum of
20 years.
PROJECT LOCATION: ROAD MAINTENANCE AND REHABILITATION (RMRA) STREET LIST
Road Name Begin Location End Location
Functional
Classification
PCI
(2018)
FISCAL
YEAR
E NAPLES ST CRESCENT DR MEDICAL CTR DR Collector 37 FY18/19
THIRD AV N FOURTH AV D ST Collector 37 FY18/19
NAPLES ST FOURTH AV THIRD AV Collector 37 FY18/19
OXFORD ST TOBIAS DR HILLTOP DR Collector 37 FY18/19
THIRD AV L ST NAPLES ST Collector 39 FY18/19
F ST FOURTH AV THIRD AV Collector 40 FY18/19
THIRD AV ORANGE AV ANITA ST Collector 39 FY18/19
L ST THIRD AV FIRST AV Collector 41 FY18/19
FIRST AV H ST I ST Collector 43 FY18/19
HILLTOP DR TELEGRAPH CYN RD E L ST Collector 44 FY18/19
I ST SECOND AV HILLTOP DR Collector 46 FY18/19
BONITA RD CITY LIMIT @
WILLOW ST
ALLEN SCHOOL RD Arterial 46 FY18/19
JURISTICTION AVERAGE NETWORK PCI: 74 as of 3/28/2018
PROJECT LEAD: William S. Valle
Office: (619)409-5976
e-mail: WValle@chulavistaca.gov
SENATE DISTRICT: 40
ASSEMBLY DISTRICT: 79, 80
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 247
City of Chula Vista
Staff Report
File#:18-0102, Item#: 6.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE FIRST
AMENDMENT TO THE EXISTING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA & T.Y. LIN
INTERNATIONAL TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES
FOR THE WILLOW STREET BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT (CIP STL-261)
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Council adopt the resolution.
SUMMARY
By Resolution 2016-222, on November 8, 2016, the City Council approved an agreement with T.Y. Lin
International (Consultant) in the amount of $2,157,242 for construction management consulting
services associated with the Phase II - Willow Street Bridge Replacement Project (CIP STL-261).
Due to unforeseen utility relocations, site conditions and environmental items from the original scope
of work, an amendment to the agreement is needed. This amendment will provide compensation for
the additional construction management services related to the unforeseen additional construction
activities. Staff recommends that the T.Y. Lin International agreement be increased by $555,586 for a
new total agreement amount of $2,712,828 in order to ensure proper Contract Administration of the
Phase II - Willow Street Bridge Replacement Project.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Environmental Notice
The Project was adequately covered in previously adopted Final Mitigated Negative Declaration for
the Willow Street Bridge Replacement Project and previously certified Categorical Exclusion pursuant
to Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 23, Section 771. Thus, no further California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) environmental
review or determination is required.
Environmental Determination
The Director of Development Services has reviewed the proposed action(s) consisting of approving
the first amendment for additional work to an existing agreement between the City of Chula Vista and
a Consulting Engineering Firm for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
and has determined that the proposed action(s) and related additional work items were adequately
covered in previously adopted Final Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Willow Street Bridge
Replacement Project. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) on November
14, 2011 the City, acting as Lead Agency, approved IS-10-006. Thus, no further CEQA environmental
review or determination is required. The Director of Development Services has also reviewed the
proposal for compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and has determined that
the proposed actions were adequately covered in previously certified Categorical Exclusion pursuant
to Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 23, Section 771. Thus, no further NEPA environmental
City of Chula Vista Printed on 4/19/2018Page 1 of 3
powered by Legistar™2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 248
File#:18-0102, Item#: 6.
to Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 23, Section 771. Thus, no further NEPA environmental
review or determination is required.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
Not applicable.
DISCUSSION
The Willow Street Bridge Replacement project includes bridge replacement and improvements to
adjacent streets and infrastructure.
Due to the complex nature of the Project’s construction, the City executed an agreement with the
Consultant for professional construction management services in accordance with the Caltrans Local
Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) and industry standards for bridge construction (Attachment
1). To date, staff is satisfied with the quality of the Consultant’s work completed under the agreement.
The Consultant and its team have been responsive to City issues and project needs.
The following unforeseen items required additional effort and construction management activities
beyond the scope of the original agreement:
·Utility conflicts, relocations and related delays that extended the project schedule ($190,000);
·Differing site conditions encountered beneath the proposed box culvert that required additional
foundation and inspection time ($40,000);
·Additional pile testing required at piles that were found to have structural anomalies ($10,000);
and
·Unpermitted Endangered Species present on-site that required full-time biological monitoring
($315,586).
City staff reviewed the amendment request (Attachment 2) submitted by the Consultant and
confirmed the associated costs. City staff recommends approval of the first amendment to the
agreement (Attachment 3) to compensate the consultant for the additional construction management
services that resulted from the items listed above.
DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT
Staff has reviewed the property holdings of the City Council members and has found no property
holdings within 500 feet of the limits of the project that is the subject of this action. Consequently, this
item does not present a disqualifying real property-related financial conflict of interest under
California Code of Regulations Title 2, section 18702.2(a)(11), for purposes of the Political Reform
Act (Cal. Gov’t Code §87100,et seq.).
Staff is not independently aware, and has not been informed by any City Council member, of any
other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter.
LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS
The City’s Strategic Plan has five major goals: Operational Excellence, Economic Vitality, Healthy
Community, Strong and Secure Neighborhoods and a Connected Community. This project supports
Strong and Secure Neighborhoods by ensuring sustainable and well-maintained infrastructure to
City of Chula Vista Printed on 4/19/2018Page 2 of 3
powered by Legistar™2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 249
File#:18-0102, Item#: 6.
provide safe and appealing communities to live, work, and play.
CURRENT YEAR FISCAL IMPACT
Provided below is a summary of the funding for the original agreement and first amendment:
SUMMARY OF AGREEMENT FUNDING
TOTAL FUNDS OBLIGATED PER RESOLUTION 2016-222
(ORIGINAL AGREEMENT)
$2,157,242
TOTAL FUNDS REQUIRED (FIRST AMENDMENT)$555,586
TOTAL FUNDS FOR AGREEMENT (ORIGINAL AGREEMENT &
FIRST AMENDMENT)
$2,712,828
All funds required for these professional construction management services have been provided
under a grant from the Highway Bridge Program (HBP) and under the City’s Transportation
Development Impact Fee (TDIF) program. The HBP will reimburse 88.53% of the eligible costs for
the construction management services. The remaining costs will be funded by TDIF. No
appropriations are needed as a result of this action as sufficient funding is available in CIP STL-261
to cover consultant costs.
ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT
Upon completion of the project, the improvements will require only routine maintenance.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolution 2016-222
2. T.Y. Lin International-First Amendment Request Letter, dated February 27, 2018
3. First Amendment to Agreement between the City of Chula Vista and T.Y. Lin International
Staff Contact: Gregory E. Tscherch, Senior Civil Engineer
City of Chula Vista Printed on 4/19/2018Page 3 of 3
powered by Legistar™2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 250
RESOLUTION NO. 2016-222
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN
THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND T.Y. LIN
INTERNATIONAL TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT CONSULTING SERVICES
FOR THE WILLOW STREET BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
PROJECT IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,157,242
WHEREAS, the Willow Street Bridge Replacement Project intends to construct a
replacement bridge across the Sweetwater River at Willow Street (bridge); and
WHEREAS, the bridge is eligible for replacement funding through the Federal Highway
Bridge Program administered through the California Department of Transportation District 11
Local Assistance; and
WHEREAS, City requires construction management services in order to oversee the
construction of the replacement Willow Street Bridge, which involves extensive specialized
structural construction, and ensure compliance with requirements associated with the Federal
Highway Bridge Program; and
WHEREAS, in order to procure these services, City Staff prepared a Request for
Proposals for Professional Construction Management Consulting Services for the "Willow Street
Bridge Replacement Project (STL261)" and advertised the scope on May 29, 2015, in
accordance with the California Department of Transportation's Local Assistance Procedures
Manual; and
WHEREAS, on July 1, 2015, the Director of Public Works Engineering received three
3) Statements of Qualifications with sealed cost proposals for the "Willow Street Bridge
Replacement Project (STL261)"; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager approved the formation of a consultant selection
Committee ( Committee) that included representation from the California Department of
Transportation; and
WHEREAS, the Committee reviewed and evaluated the qualifications and proposals
from the three (3) proposing firms and conducted proposal interviews with the three (3)
proposing firms; and
WHEREAS, at the end of the review and interview process, the Committee
selected T. Y. Lin International; and
WHEREAS, staff recommends that the agreement with T. Y. Lin International be
approved in the amount of $2,157,242.
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 251
Resolution No. 2016-222
Page No. 2
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula
Vista, that it approves the agreement between the City of Chula Vista and T. Y. Lin
International, to Provide Professional Construction Management Consulting Services, in the
form presented, with such minor modifications as may be required or approved by the City
Attorney, a copy of which shall be kept on file in the Office of the City Clerk, and authorizes and
directs the Mayor to execute same.
Presented by
Richard A. Hopkins
Director of Public Works
Approved as to form by
Glen ' . Googin u
orney
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of .Chula Vista,
California, this 8th day of November 2016 by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers: Aguilar, Bensoussan, McCann, Miesen, and Salas
NAYS: Councilmembers: None
ABSENT: Councilmembers: None
Maryaalas, Mayor
ATTEST:
Donna R. orris, C, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
I, Donna R. Norris, City Clerk of Chula Vista, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution No. 2016-222 was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council at a
regular meeting of the Chula Vista City Council held on the 8th day of November 2016.
Executed this 8th day of November 2016.
Donna R. is, C C, City Clerk
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 252
February 27, 2018
Mr. Gregory Tscherch, PE, PLS
Project Manager
City of Chula Vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
SUBJECT: Request for Contract Change Order for TYLI Contract for
Professional Construction Management Consulting Services for
Phase II of the Willow Street Bridge Widening Project
Dear Mr. Tscherch:
T.Y. Lin International (TYLI) is requesting a contract change order to our contract to provide additional Professional
Construction Management Consulting Services for Phase II of the Willow Street Bridge Widening Project. The total cost
for the added work performed to date plus the estimated future cost of work related to these items is $555,586.00. The
additional costs are compensation for the following added work outside the original scope of the project.
· $190,000 - Utility conflicts, relocations and related delays, which extended the project schedule
· $40,000 - Differing Site Condition under box culvert, requiring additional foundation work and additional
inspection time
· $10,000 - Additional pile testing required at piles found to have structural anomalies
· $315,586 - Unpermitted Endangered Species presence on site, requiring full time monitoring and extended
schedule
All of these activities were discussed with the City at the time they were first encountered, and all work has been
coordinated with the City throughout the project. It was agreed upon at the time each event was encountered that TYLI
would track associated costs and schedule effects and provide a summary of extra work once the revised Biological
Opinion was provided by Caltrans and the remaining scope of services related to the endangered species could be
determined. A detailed schedule and budget breakdown for this change order request is being provided separately for
your review and records based on our meeting on February 23.
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
T.Y. Lin International
Wade Durant, PE
Resident Engineer
M: 619.279.3489 wade.durant@tylin.com
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 253
City of Chula Vista Amendment to Agreement No.: 16109
Consultant Name: T.Y. Lin International Rev. 2018.04.11
FIRST AMENDMENT
to Agreement between the
City of Chula Vista
and
T.Y. Lin International
To Provide Professional Construction Management Consulting Services for the Willow
Street Bridge Replacement Project (CIP #STL261)
This FIRST AMENDMENT To Agreement Between The City of Chula Vista and T.Y. Lin
International To Provide Construction Management Consulting Services for the Willow Street
Bridge Replacement Project (CIP #261) (“First Amendment ”) is entered into effective as of
April 24, 2018 “Effective Date” by and between the City of Chula Vista (“City”) and T.Y. Lin
International, a California corporation (“Consultant”), with reference to the following facts:
RECITALS
WHEREAS, City and Consultant previously entered into an Agreement between City of
Chula Vista and T.Y. Lin International for Professional Construction Management Consulting
Services for the Willow Street Bridge Replacement Project (“Original Agreement”) on
November 8, 2016 by Resolution No. 2016-222; and
WHEREAS, the Original Agreement amount was $2,157,242 and, to date, $1,239,109.57
has been paid to the Consultant which results in a remaining balance of $918,132.43; and
WHEREAS, due to the complex nature of the project construction, City staff procured
professional construction management consulting services to coordinate, inspect, monitor, and
document construction of the project in accordance with Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures
Manual (LAPM) and industry standards for bridge construction; and
WHEREAS, the First Amendment will increase the Original Agreement by $555,586,
resulting in a new total agreement amount of $2,712,828; and
WHEREAS, City and Consultant desire to amend the Agreement to account for increases
in costs associated with some items from the original scope of work that require additional time
and effort to ensure completion of the Willow Street Bridge Replacement project under the
agreement; and
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above recitals and the mutual obligations of
the parties set forth herein, City and Consultant agree as follows:
1. Exhibit A, entitled Amended and Restated Scope of Work and Payment Terms is
hereby attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
2. Except as expressly provided herein, all other terms and conditions of the Original
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 254
City of Chula Vista Amendment to Agreement No.: 16109
Consultant Name: T.Y. Lin International Rev. 2018.04.11
3. Each party represents that it has full right, power and authority to execute this First
Amendment and to perform its obligations hereunder, without the need for any
further action under its governing instruments, and the parties executing this
Amendment on the behalf of such party are duly authorized agents with authority to
do so.
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 255
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 256
City of Chula Vista Amendment to Agreement No.: 16109
Consultant Name: T.Y. Lin International Rev. 2018.04.11
EXHIBIT A
AMENDED AND RESTATED
SCOPE OF WORK AND PAYMENT TERMS
1. Contact People for Contract Administration and Legal Notice
A. City Contract Administration:
Gregory E. Tscherch, P.E., P.L.S.
276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 91910
619-409-1974
gtscherch@chulavistaca.gov
For Legal Notice Copy to:
City of Chula Vista
City Attorney
276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 91910
619-691-5037
CityAttorney@chulavistaca.us
B. Contractor/Service Provider Contract Administration:
T.Y. Lin International
404 Camino del Rio South, Suite 700, San Diego, CA 92108
619-279-3489
wade.durant@tylin.com
For Legal Notice Copy to:
Clark Fernon, P.E.
Unit Manager-So Cal/Nevada
T.Y. Lin International
404 Camino del Rio South, Suite 700, San Diego, CA 92108
619-692-1920
clark.fernon@tylin.com
2. Required Services
A. General Description:
T. Y. Lin International will provide Resident Engineering, Construction Inspection, Bridge
Inspection, Construction Surveying, Environmental Compliance, Geotechnical, and Materials
Testing Services for the construction of the replacement Willow Street Bridge over the
Sweetwater River.
B. Detailed Description:
The project scope of work shall be as described in the Request for Proposals and as
summarized below:
> Construction Inspection and Management Services
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 257
City of Chula Vista Amendment to Agreement No.: 16109
Consultant Name: T.Y. Lin International Rev. 2018.04.11
Consultant shall provide professional engineering services to perform construction
inspection, embodying the necessary qualifications and experience to perform construction
management services in accordance with the Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual
Chapter 16 "Administer Construction Contracts" and Chapter 17 "Project Completion". The
Consultant team shall include a Resident Engineer (RE) to be the designated contact for all
communications and coordination of operations regarding Construction Inspection,
Geotechnical, Construction Surveying and Document Management Services with the
Contractors and the City Oversight Resident Engineer (ORE). With the support of the Bridge
and Construction Inspectors, the RE will review the Contractor's performance of work in
accordance with the Contract Documents. The RE will draft and/or review change orders,
provide oversight of inspectors, review inspector diaries as needed, review estimate quantity
sheets, generate/review monthly progress pay estimates, and assist the ORE as requested,
which may include supporting inspection of the construction of bridge or civil improvements
depending on the RE’s expertise. The RE shall also provide accurate and thorough
recordkeeping utilizing Caltrans' numbered file system. All submittals, Requests for
Information (RFI), and requests for staking, testing, or sampling shall be coordinated by the
RE with ORE review and approval.
Consultant shall provide a Construction Inspector to coordinate all requests and submittals
from the Contractor pertaining to civil improvements through the RE and assist the RE and
Bridge Inspector in performing their respective duties and shall be responsible for supporting
oversight of the construction of civil improvements for the project.
The Consultant team shall also include a The Bridge Inspector will report to the RE and will
be responsible for reviewing aspects of the work pertaining to construction of structures with
periodic assistance from the Construction Inspector as needed. The Bridge Inspector is to
perform the duties of the RE and Construction Inspector for aspects of the project pertaining
to bridge construction, and will coordinate administrative tasks such as requests, submittals,
claims, and document management with the RE.
> Construction Surveying Services
The Consultant shall provide professional land surveying services during the project
construction and shall provide all labor, tools, materials, including stakes, hubs, flagging,
nails and paint, and equipment such as vehicles, survey equipment, personal computers,
camera, and personal safety devices to perform this work. The Consultant’s personnel shall
have experience performing all phases of Technical and Professional Land surveying for
bridge replacement projects, knowledge of Caltrans requirements, ability to provide land
surveying reports in accordance with applicable governing codes and shall have sufficient
capacity to provide the requested services in a cost effective, timely and professional manner.
Team members are to be qualified licensed land surveyors, and technicians experienced in a
wide variety of structure construction engineering, field inspection, field engineering,
contract administration and other related duties.
> Environmental Compliance Services
The Consultant shall review and interpret environmental regulatory requirements and
conduct field inspections and audits of ongoing construction operations and records as
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 258
City of Chula Vista Amendment to Agreement No.: 16109
Consultant Name: T.Y. Lin International Rev. 2018.04.11
necessary to ensure compliance with regulatory agency permit requirements. The Consultant
shall have the capability and be prepared to liaison with the City’s environmental personnel
along with local, state, and federal regulatory inspectors. The Consultant shall also assist the
ORE in coordinating any external audits that may be performed by regulatory agencies. Refer
to the Willow Street Bridge Replacement Project Mitigation Measure Monitoring and
Reporting Program for specific monitoring and training requirements. The Consultant shall
also observe and document Contractor compliance with the MMMRP during routine survey
visits.
> Geotechnical Services
The Consultant shall provide professional engineering services to perform geotechnical and
special inspection testing services during the project construction and shall provide
appropriate equipment such as vehicles, drilling equipment, laboratory test equipment,
personal computers, camera, tools, and personal safety equipment to perform this work. The
Consultant’s personnel shall have experienced performing geotechnical investigations for
bridge replacement projects, knowledge of Caltrans requirements, ability to provide
geotechnical investigation reports in accordance with applicable governing codes and shall
have sufficient capacity to provide the requested services in a cost effective, timely and
professional manner. Team members are to be registered Geotechnical Engineer or a Civil
Engineer, geologist, CAD operator and laboratory and concrete technicians experienced in a
wide variety of structure construction engineering, soils engineering, field inspection,
material testing, field engineering, contract administration and other related duties. In-situ
soil mitigation activities are not anticipated for this project as the liquefiable soils will be
mitigated by the foundation design.
> Materials Testing Services
The material testing consultant will provide, on an as-needed basis, quality assurance check
testing of permanent materials used in the project, such as compacted earthwork, Portland
cement concrete, asphalt concrete, reinforcement, pre-stressing materials, grout, and check
lines and grades of structures, etc. Multiple laboratories may be needed depending on the
materials being tested and whether a laboratory is qualified to test a given material.
3. Term: In accordance with Section 1.10 of the Original Agreement, the term of the
Amendment shall begin November 8, 2016 and end on December 31, 2020 for completion of
all Required Services.
4. Compensation:
A. Form of Compensation
☒ Time and Materials. For performance of the Defined Services by Consultant as herein
required, City shall pay Consultant for the productive hours of time spent by Consultant in the
performance of said Services, at the rates or amounts as indicated in the attached Exhibit B and
summarized below:
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 259
City of Chula Vista Amendment to Agreement No.: 16109
Consultant Name: T.Y. Lin International Rev. 2018.04.11
Name Original Agreement
Amount
First Amendment
Amount
T.Y. Lin International
(Consultant) $1,361,607 $187,000.00
DHS (Sub-Contractor) $217,875 $40,000.00
ECORP Consulting, Inc.
(Sub-Contractor) $123,838 $288,586.00
Sampo Engineering, Inc.
(Sub-Contractor) $116,599 $30,000.00
EarthSpectives
(Sub-Contractor) $30,725 $10,000.00
Southern California Soil &
Testing, Inc.
(Sub-Contractor)
$237,179 $0.00
Safework
(Sub-Contractor) $14,808 $0.00
ZT Consulting Group
(Sub-Contractor) $7,812 $0.00
STC Traffic, Inc.
(Sub-Contractor) $46,800 $0.00
$2,157,242.00 $555,586.00
New Agreement Amount (Original Agreement + First Amendment) = $2,712,828.00
The maximum amount to be paid to the Consultant for all services provided under the Original
Agreement and First Amendment shall not exceed $2,712,828.00.
B. Reimbursement of Costs
☒ Invoiced for agreed-upon amounts as identified in Exhibit B
5. Special Provisions:
☒ Permitted Sub-Contractor/Service Providers:
DHS
Southern California Soil & Testing, Inc.
ECORP Consulting, Inc.
Sampo Engineering, Inc.
EarthSpectives
STC Traffic, Inc.
ZT Consulting Group, Inc.
Safework, Inc.
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 260
Prepared for: City of Chula VistaWillow Street Bridge Construction ManagementSTAFFING PLAN, COSTS and FEESLast Update :2/22/2018POSITIONWADE DURANTRESIDENT ENGINEER/STRUCTURE REP.ASHLEY BRIGMONBRIDGE INSPECTOR/FIELD ENGINEER/SWPPPBRIDGE INSPECTOR/FIELD ENGINEER-*as neededCATHY SALASPROJECT ADMINISTRATIONRAFAEL PEREZROADWAY INSPECTORLUCAS RATHE**ROADWAY INSPECTOR**CARLOS MENDEZ**ROADWAY INSPECTOR** ** used as available for 2nd shifts or when Tyson is not availableBrad HaleyEnvironmental Compliance CoordinatorCheryl JenkinsLead BiologistJosh Corona-BennettSenior Biologist/Restoration EcologistShannan ShafferSenior/Permitted Wildlife BiologistGreg HamptonAssistant Biologist/MonitorWendy TurnerAssociate Biologist/MonitorJessie DubusAssistant Biologist/MonitorRoger Mason, PhD, RPACultural Resources Principal InvestigatorUnnamedStaff Biologist/GIS TechnicianUnnamedProduction Coordinator / Technical EditorUnnamedAssociate Word Processor VINCE SAMPOPRINCIPAL SURVEYORSTEVE BUECHE/VINCE SAMPO2 MAN SURVEY CREW DALLAS BUCKNEROFFICE CALCS/MAPPERHOSSEIN RASHIDIPILE GGL TESTING - ANALYSIS AND REPORTINGGGL TECHNICIANPILE GGL FILED TESTINGTOM CANADYPROJECT MANAGER/PRINCIPAL ENGINEERDOUG SKINNERSENIOR ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGIST/HAZ-7 CHARACTERIZATIONANDREW NEUHAUSPROJECT GEOLOGIST/CIDH PILE DRILLING OBSERVATIONPW GROUP 1SOIL COMPACTION TESTINGPW GROUP 2CONCRETE SAMPLING AND TESTINGPW GROUP 2WELDING INSPECTIONAMBER WARDADMINISTRATION ASSISTANTKATHY KEATINGLABOR COMPLIANCETHOMAS ROMEROLABOR COMPLIANCESOURCE INSPECTORSOURCE INSPECTION - CULVERT, REBARFARZAD TASBIHGOOSOURCE INSPECTION - CULVERT, REBARCHRIS COMESSIGNAL INSTALLATION INSPECTIONSAFEWORK (DBE)ZT CONSULTING GROUPSTC Traffic, Inc.SAMPO ENGINEERING (DBE)EARTHSPECTIVES (Billing is per test and report, not per hour)SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOILS AND TESTINGT.Y. LIN INTERNATIONALDHS (DBE)ECORPNAMEODCsOriginal For Budget20182019Hours$Hours$Hours$Hours$$Hours$%BudgetRevisionPurposes Use$203.46$203.4660$12,2081665$338,7611840$374,366940$191,252$20,0004505$936,58738.64%$1,548,61263.9%$1,361,607$187,004.70$187,000.00$137.47$137.470$01620$222,7012040$280,439580$79,733$21,2004240$604,07324.92%$136.31$136.310$00$00$00$0$00$00.00%$110.44$110.440$036$3,97636$3,9760$072$7,9520.33%$176.56$176.560$0720$127,125100$17,656600$105,938$7,1001420$257,81910.64%$257,81910.6%$217,875$39,943.77$40,000.00$171.19$171.190$00$00$00$0$00$0$134.24$134.240$00$00$00$00$00$00$00$00$00$0$145.00$145.0015$2,17541$5,94531$4,49514$2,030$3,400101$18,0450.74%$123,8385.1%$123,838$0.00$288,586.00$135.00$135.007$945104$14,04062$8,37014$1,890187$25,2451.04%$135.00$135.000$00$00$092$12,42092$12,4200.51%SEE SEPARATE ECORP PLAN$145.00$145.000$039$5,65532$4,6400$071$10,2950.42%$69.00$69.0010$690171$11,799112$7,728112$7,728405$27,9451.15%(original plan shown here)$91.00$91.000$0116$10,55698$8,91878$7,098292$26,5721.10%$69.00$69.000$00$00$00$00$00.00%$166.00$166.000$012$1,9920$00$012$1,9920.08%$100.00$100.000$04$4000$04$4008$8000.03%$131.00$131.000$00$00$04$5244$5240.02%$59.00$59.000$00$00$00$00$00.00%$185.61$185.610$012$2,22711$2,0424$742$1,99927$7,0100.29%$146,2466.0%$116,599$29,646.84$30,000.00$436.59$436.590$099$43,222116$50,64448$20,956263$114,8234.74%$141.93$141.930$058$8,23258$8,23256$7,948172$24,4121.01%$0.00$0.000$00$00$00$0$30,7250$30,7251.27%$40,7251.7%$30,725$10,000.00$10,000.00$0.00$0.000$00$00$00$0$10,0000$10,000$197.24$197.240$020$3,94524$4,7344$789$30,00048$39,4681.63%$237,1799.8%$237,179$0.00$124.21$124.210$020$2,48416$1,9878$994$8,00044$13,4650.56%$111.05$111.050$040$4,44232$3,5548$88880$8,8840.37%$129.93$129.930$0528$68,603208$27,025160$20,789896$116,4174.80%$134.33$134.330$0200$26,866168$22,56724$3,224392$52,6572.17%$134.33$134.330$08$1,0758$1,0758$1,07524$3,2240.13%$63.82$63.820$020$1,27624$1,5324$25548$3,0630.13%$132.21$132.210$056$7,40448$6,3468$1,058112$14,8080.61%$14,8080.6%$14,808$0.00$61.82$61.820$00$00$00$00$00.00%$99$990$052$5,1480$00$0$90052$6,0480.25%$7,8120.3%$7,812$0.00$147.00$147.000$012$1,7640$00$012$1,7640.07%$150.00$150.000$0212$31,80060$9,00040$6,000312$46,8001.93%$46,8001.9%$46,800$0.000$00$00$00$00$092$16,017.605865$951,438.725124$849,326.392810$473,730.76$133,324.0013891$2,423,837100%Totals100%$2,157,242$266,595.31$555,586.00(Does not include Ecorp changes)(Does not include Ecorp changes)$418,87217.3%Estimated DBE ParticipationSAFEWORK (DBE)ZT CONSULTING GROUPSTC Traffic, Inc.SAMPO ENGINEERING (DBE)EARTHSPECTIVESSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOILS AND TESTINGT.Y. LIN INTERNATIONALDHS (DBE)ECORPSubtotal per FirmFee Estimate2016 201720182019TotalLABOR RATES2018-04-24 Agenda PacketPage 261
Prepared for: City of Chula VistaExhibit AWillow Street Bridge Construction ManagementSTAFFING PLAN ECORPLast Update :2/22/2018CloseoutPOSITIONJanFeb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr MayODCsSubtotal per Firm20182019160200160160200160160200160160200160160200160160Hours$Hours$$Hours$%00ECORPBrad HaleyEnvironmental Compliance Coordinator$145.00$145.00222222222222221020$2,90018$2,61038$5,5104.76%$115,699Margaret BornyaszSenior Regulatory Specialist)$155.00$155.000$00$00.00%Cheryl JenkinsLead Biologist$135.00$135.00545454242429241510102924242429298$40,230130$17,550428$57,78049.94%Wendy TurnerAssociate Biologist/Monitor$91.00$91.00404040101010101010101010101040190$17,29080$7,280270$24,57021.24%Wendy Turner (Overtime)Associate Biologist/Monitor$136.50$136.5010101030$4,09530$4,0953.54%Greg HamptonAssistant Biologist/Monitor$69.00$69.001000$0100$6,900100$6,9005.96%Josh Corona-BennettSenior Biologist/Restoration Ecologist$135.00$135.00920$092$12,42092$12,42010.73%Shannan ShafferSenior/Permitted Wildlife Biologist$145.00$145.000$0$00$00.00%Brian ZittSenior Biologist/Aquatic Biologist$145.00$145.000$00$00.00%Roger Mason, PhD, RPACultural Resources Principal Investigator$166.00$166.000$0$00$00.00%UnnamedStaff Biologist/GIS Technician$100.00$100.0040$04$4004$4000.35%UnnamedProduction Coordinator / Technical Editor$131.00$131.0040$04$5244$5240.45%UnnamedAssociate Word Processor $59.00$59.000$0$00$00.00%0.00%$2,000$2,000ODCs$1,500$1,500subcontractors and equipment 538 $64,515.00 428 $47,684.00 $3,500.00 966$115,699.0097% TotalsDateBudgetActual DifferenceNov-160$1,630.00 $1,630.00Dec-163,810.00$4,251.25 $441.25Total 2016$3,810.00$5,881.25$2,071.25Jan-17$1,740.00$9,839.86 $8,099.86Feb-17$8,564.00$7,359.00($1,205.00)Mar-17$4,296.00$2,248.94($2,047.06)Apr-17$6,288.00$3,824.98($2,463.02)May-17$4,858.00$2,099.00($2,759.00)Jun-17$6,645.00$76,075.82 $69,430.82Jul-17$4,325.00$35,693.00 $31,368.00Aug-17$5,447.00$35,890.55 $30,443.55Sep-17$2,423.00$26,940.66 $24,517.66Oct-17$1,877.00$25,783.77 $23,906.77Nov-17$2,605.00$18,848.53 $16,243.53Dec-17$1,319.00$17,791.28 $16,472.28Total 2017$50,387$262,395.39 $212,008.39Jan-18$1,059.00$16,449.00 $15,390.002/1/2018 (approx.)$1,059.00$12,000.00$10,941.00Total 2018$2,118.00$28,449.00 $26,331.00Total 11/2016-2/2018$56,315.00$296,725.64 $240,410.64 revised budget 3/1/18-5/31/19$115,699original budget 3/1/18-5/31/19$67,382Original Total Project Budget $123,838Revised Total Project Budget$412,424.64Overall difference$288,586.64ECORPNAMEFee EstimateLabor Rates2018 2019+ TotalPhase 5C, 620182019Phase 72/27/20182018-04-24 Agenda PacketPage 262
C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@D40D071F\@BCL@D40D071F.doc
RESOLUTION NO. __________
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO
THE EXISTING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA & T.Y. LIN INTERNATIONAL TO PROVIDE
PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
SERVICES FOR THE WILLOW STREET BRIDGE
REPLACEMENT PROJECT (CIP STL-261)
WHEREAS, on November 8, 2016, by Resolution No. 2016-222, the City Council
approved an agreement with T.Y. Lin International in the amount of $2,157,242 for construction
management consulting services associated with the Phase II-Willow Street Bridge Replacement
Project in accordance with Chula Vista Municipal Code section 2.56.110; and
WHEREAS, additional time and effort is required by T.Y. Lin International in order to
complete the construction management consulting services due to unforeseen utility relocations,
site conditions and environmental items that were not accounted for with the original agreement;
and
WHEREAS, the First Amendment to the agreement will ensure that the City has retained
sufficient construction management professional services for the completion of the Phase II –
Willow Street Bridge Replacement Project; and
WHEREAS, T.Y. Lin International’s team has been responsive to City issues and project
needs, and City Staff is satisfied with their performance; and
WHEREAS, staff reviewed the amendment request submitted by T.Y. Lin International
and confirmed the associated costs; and
WHEREAS, staff recommends that the T.Y. Lin International agreement be amended to
increase the contract by $555,586, resulting in a new maximum contract amount of $2,712,828.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista
that it approves the First Amendment to the Agreement between the City of Chula Vista and T.Y.
Lin International To Provide Professional Construction Management Services for the Willow
Street Bridge Project (CIP #STL 261), in the form presented, with such minor modifications as
may be required or approved by the City Attorney, a copy of which shall be kept on file in the
Office of the City Clerk, and authorizes and directs the Mayor to execute same.
Presented by:William S. Valle
Director of Engineering & Capital Projects
Approved as to form by:
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 263
Resolution No.
Page 2
Glen R. Googins City Attorney
2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 264
City of Chula Vista
Staff Report
File#:18-0143, Item#: 7.
PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION ON THE CITY’S FISCAL YEAR 2019 BASELINE BUDGET
AND LONG-TERM FINANCIAL PLAN
City of Chula Vista Printed on 4/19/2018Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™2018-04-24 Agenda Packet Page 265