Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2018-04-25 PC Agenda CITY OF CHULAVISTA Planning Commission REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA PLANNING COMMISSION April 25, 2018 Council Chambers 6:00 p.m. Public Services Bldg A 276 Fourth Avenue CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL: Commissioners Anaya, Burroughs, Calvo, Milburn, Nava, Zaker and Chair Gutierrez MOTIONS TO EXCUSE: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND MOMENT OF SILENCE OPENING STATEMENT: 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: March 28, 2018 PUBLIC COMMENTS: An opportunity for members of the public to speak to the Planning Commission on any subject matter within the Commission's jurisdiction, but not an item on today's agenda. Each speaker's presentation may not exceed three minutes. CONSENT ITEMS: The Chair may entertain requests by staff to continue an agenda item. The Chair may also entertain a recommendation by a Commissioner to approve certain non-controversial agenda items as Consent items. Notwithstanding the foregoing, an agenda item listed as a Public Hearing may not be acted upon by the Commission as a Consent Item. Public Hearing items shall be heard by the Commission as a Public Hearing. Planning Commission Agenda April 25, 2018 Page-2- PUBLIC HEARINGS The following item(s) have been advertised as public hearing(s) as required by law. If you wish to speak on any item, please fill out a "Request to Speak"form (available in the lobby) and submit it to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting. 2. PUBLIC HEARING DR16-0020; Design Review consideration of a four-story building totaling 35,360 square-feet, consisting of 43 apartment units with associated parking and open space on approximately 0.61 acres located at 288 Center Street. Applicant: McNamara Ventures Resolution of the City of Chula Vista Planning Commission approving a Design Review Permit, DR16-0020 to construct a four- story building totaling 35,360 square-feet consisting of 43 apartment units with associated parking and open space on approximately 0.61 acres located at 288 Center Street. Staff Recommendation: That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution DR16-0020 approving the project,based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. OTHER BUSINESS 3. DIRECTOR'S REPORT: 4. COMMISSION COMMENTS: ADJOURNMENT to the next Regular Planning Commission Meeting on May 9, 2018, at 6:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers. Materials provided to the Planning Commission related to any open-session item on this agenda are available for public review at the City Housing Office, located in City Hall at 276 Fourth Avenue, Building 300, during normal business hours. In compliance with the AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT The City of Chula Vista requests individuals who require special accommodations to access, attend, and/or participate in a City meeting, activity, or service, contact Patricia Laughlin at (519)409-3575 (California Relay Service is available for the hearing impaired by dialing 711)at least forty-eight hours in advance of the meeting. ITEM 1 MINUTESAPPROVAL OF MARCH t My OF CHULAV15TA PlanninLy Commission 'Vin t4 fes REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA PLANNING COMMISSION March 28, 2018 Council Chambers 6:00 p.m. Public Services Bldg A 276 Fourth Avenue CALL TO ORDER COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Anaya, Burroughs, Gutierrez, Milburn, Zaker COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Nava and Calvo MOTIONS TO EXCUSE: Nava and Calvo MSC: Anaya/ Motion Passed: 5-0-0 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND MOMENT OF SILENCE OPENING STATEMENT: 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Date: March 14, 2018 MSC: Zaker/Burroughs Motion Passed: 5-0-0 PUBLIC COMMENTS: An opportunity far members of the public to speak to the Planning Commission on any subject matter within the Commission's jurisdiction, but not an item on today's agenda. Each speaker-'s presentation may not exceed three minutes. Joseph Raso, businessman and Chula Vista resident made a formal request to have the Commission request that staff look in to his previous recommendation to eliminate the parking requirements in the core area of downtown Chula Vista, He submitted a document to the Commissioners with a brief history of his attempt to open a small caf6 on Broadway. Planning Commission Minutes March 28, 2018 Page-2- PUBLIC HEARINGS The following item(s) have been advertised as public hearing(s) as required by law. If you wish to speak on any item, please fill out a "Request to Speak"form (available in the lobby) and submit it to the Board Secretary prior to the meeting. PUBLIC HEARING FEIR 17-0001; MPA17-0006; PCM 15-07, PCS 15-03, Consideration of Final Environmental Impact Report 17-0001, amendments to the Otay Ranch General Development Plan, a new Portion of the Village 4 Sectional Planning Area Plan, a new Tentative Map for Chula Vista Tract 15-03, and the Planned Community District Regulations for a portion of Otay Ranch Village 4. Resolution No. FEIR 17-0001: Recommending that the City Council make Certain Findings of Fact; Adopt a Statement of Overriding Considerations; Adopt a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and Certify the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR17-0001/SCH 2016041080) for amendments to the Otay Ranch General Development Plan, adopt a new Portion of Village Four Sectional Planning Area Plan, and associated Tentative Map pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. Resolution No MPA17-0006; PCM 15-07, PCS 15-03; Recommending that the City Council 1) Approve amendments to the Otay Ranch General Development Plan; 2) Approve a new Portion of the Village Four Sectional Planning Area Plan and Tentative Map; and 4) approve an Ordinance associated with the Planned Community District Regulations. QUESTIONS FROM STAFF—Questions from Commissioners included these items: • Will there be any retail or commercial? • What is the elevation? • The difference between open space and open space reserve. Commissioner Zaker stopped by his house on the way to the meeting and found an anonymous letter directed to his home address. It was regarding a number of concerns regarding the project. He brought it so that it could be added to the record and stated it would, by no means, influence his thoughts or vote regarding the project. Planning Commission Minutes March 28,2018 Page-3- PUBLIC HEARING OPENED , Marcela Escobar Eck (Atlantis Group/Land Use) gave a brief presentation on the project. She stressed that they are preserving about 70% of the open space on the site. This, in turn, is what accounts for the higher density in the north of the project. Also, they worked closely with the resource agency regarding the sensitive wild-life habitat. Mark Livag, resident, also received the anonymous letter. The additional 150 units will be added to the Quarry area at some point. Is there no way to put those 150 units back into the same area as in the original SPA plan? His second concern was in regards to the Fiscal Impact. Spoke about single family vs multi-family and how it affects the Fiscal Impact. Doesn't understand how you can take single family clustering fees and turn them into apartments. He addressed the issue of single-family clustering vs apartment units. When you get in to the apartment model, you change the traffic patterns and the whole impact of everything. He asked the Commission to consider these concerns, and if need be, ask more questions. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED COMMISSIONER DELIBERATIONS—included questions on: • Questioned financial analysis in that it says it would be positive revenue to the City within one year—thought it usually take 5-7 years • Public safety availability—what happens if 1/2 cent sales tax does not pass? • Density • Fees in-lieu of parks • Closeness to the nearest retail center—concerns on Economic Development • Was the Fiscal Analysis compared to the original SPA plan configuration • Roads that lead into and out of the project. • Fiscal model based on old numbers? • Is the .87-acre site for private recreational use-if so, what kind? • Financing of fire stations, sewer system and utilities • The impact of increased density? • Will the City continue to fall behind on the public safety standards? Concerns regarding the fiscal impact, balance of business land vs residential and the park land were addressed by Director of Development Services Kelly Broughton. Marcella. Escobar Eck addressed the distance to existing shopping— Otay Ranch Towne Center is about 1.5 miles. It is too early to tell about the retail adjacent to this project. Kent Arden, Home Fed, spoke about his project which is adjacent to this project. Ground breaking to take place this year and that will take care of road problems. Stan Donn, Sr. Planner and Marcella Escobar Eck spoke on the small, non-city park and the community amenities. Donn also spoke about zoning and regulations of site. Director Broughton answered many of the questions regarding fiscal, impacts, roads and density. Planning Commission Minutes March 28, 2018 Page-4- Commissioner Zaker had a question regarding Page 77, #14 which addressed funding of a 4" Fire Fighter after the issuance of the 121 st Building Permit. Commissioner Milbum asked if a cross-analysis for Police and Fire in a new construction site on a per-unit basis. Director Broughton assured Zaker that at the issuance of the 121s' Building Permit, the applicant would be held to the funding agreement and he stated that a per-unit cost had not been done, but that staff was currently working on a study that would also include information on east-side vs west-side calls for service. That concern is definitely addressed in the new study. MSC: Gutierrez/Anaya Vote: 5-0-0 (Nava and Calvo absent) OTHER BUSINESS 2. DIRECTOR'S REPORT: The City has completed the draft of the University SPA Plan which is now out for Public Review. This is an important next step to be able to entice a University to locate here. 3. COMMISSION COMMENTS: Anaya —would like an update on the K &Third project Broughton advised the applicant had begun the project and as they got further along, realized that the cost of construction had gone up so much that they could not continue at this time. Are still processing some small amendments to the project, so they appear to be serious about moving forward. Anaya - driving here on Broadway he realized the former Village Card room is now gone. The Pho Restaurant is now vacant (corner of F & Broadway) — is there anything in the cue for that area (between F and Moss)? Broughton— nothing currently, but hoping that the combination of the Broadway & Moss project being complete will spark some interest. Zaker: As the City moves forward with an RFP and hiring a consultant, could Mr. Rasso be involved in that as he has shown a definite interest. Broughton — We are actively participating with the Third Avenue Village Association — he believes Mr. Rasso is part of that group and will be actively involved. Also, is there anything at Third & E Streets? Sr. Planner Donn — is working on that project with a developer who is planning a Senior Housing Development—(55+) - single unit apartments. Planning Commission Minutes March 28, 2018 Page-5- Broughton—on the corner—a developer is interested in a nice restaurant. Kitty-corner to that location —we have an application for a mixed-use project. ADJOURNMENT at 7:14 p.m. to the next Regular Planning Commission Meeting on April 11, 2018 at 6:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers. CHULA VISTA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA STATEMENT Item: 2 Meeting Date: 4/25/18 ITEM TITLE: A. Public Hearing: DR16-0020; Design Review consideration of a four- story building totaling 35,360 square-feet, consisting of 43 apartment units with associated parking and open space on approximately 0.61 acres located at 288 Center Street. Applicant: McNamara Ventures Resolution of the City of Chula Vista Planning Commission approving a Design Review Permit, DR16-0020 to constrict a four-story building totaling 35,360 square-feet consisting of 43 apartment units with associated parking and open space on approximately 0.61 acres located at 288 Center Street. SUBMITTED BY: Caroline Young, Associate Plamler REVIEWED BY: Kelly Broughton, Director of Development Services INTRODUCTION On June 13, 2016, the Applicant submitted a Design Review application for approval of the above-referenced apartment project. The site is currently a City owned parking lot and is in the process of being sold to the Applicant(see Locator Map, Attachment 1). ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Development Services Director has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the proposed project was adequately covered in the previously adopted Urban Core Specific Plan Final Environmental Impact Report and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program FEIR 06-01, certified by the Chula Vista City Council in May 2007. Thus, no further environmental review is required. RECOMMENDATION: That the Plamling Commission adopt Resolution DR 16-0020 approving the project, based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. DISCUSSION: Project Site Characteristics: The .61-acre project site is located in the western portion of Chula Vista. Currently, the site is a City parking lot within the Downtown District. The site is surrounded by a senior housing Planning Commission April 25, 2018 Page No. 2 facility to the north, a church to the east, the church's parking lot to the south, and retail stores, restaurant, and a bar to the west along Third Avenue (Attachment 1, Locator Map). Summary of Surrounding Land Uses General Plan Zoning Current Land Use Site: Mixed-Use Residential V-1 City Parking Lot South: Mixed-Use Residential V-1 Church Parking Lot North: Mixed-Use Residential V-1 Senior Housing East: Mixed-Use Residential V-1 Church West: Mixed-Use Residential V-2 Retail Stores/Restaurants/Bar Project Description The proposal includes a four-story building totaling 35,360 square-feet and includes six different plan types ranging from studio, one, two, and three bedroom units for a total of 43 apartment units. The floor plans, consisting of 4 studio units, 28-one bedroom units, 8-two bedroom units, and 3-three bedroom units are sized at approximately 393 square-feet to 1,295 square-feet for each unit. The proposed floor plans include a kitchen, dining room, living room, bathrooms, and bedrooms. Each unit has a space within the carport and an off-site parking site within the Downtown Parking District. First floor plan design provides for front entries off a patio/deck area. Balconies are provided for units on the upper floors. Architecture The modern style architecture incorporates textural and natural materials representing a modern look. Simple bold forms are provided in wood screens, brick siding, lap siding, patios and balconies. The color of the stucco building is white and grey with yellow stucco accents on the balconies and "evening blue" and "cobblestone" color for the lap siding. A "black diamond velor" colored brick siding is provided around the base of the building along the patio areas. The balcony areas have a decorative metal railing or a stucco wall with a yellow color. Other materials include a flat roof with stucco roof projections. Amenities On site amenities include a rooftop deck that provides several pedestrian features such as tables, chairs, BBQ, fire pit, and landscaping. Other open space areas are provided in private balconies and patios and along the perimeter of the project site. Each unit is provided with either a balcony or a patio. Pedestrian/Vehicle Access There are several pedestrian access ways on and off the site. The two main pedestrian links are provided off of Church Avenue. Direct entryways to residential units on the first floor are along both street frontages. Vehicles can access the site through a driveway along the alleyway via Center Street. Planning Commission April 25, 2018 Page No. 3 Compliance with Development Standards The following Project Data Table shows the development regulations along with the Applicant's proposal to meet said requirements: Assessor's Parcel Number: 568-334-05-00, 06, 07, 08 Current Zoning: V-1 General Plan Designation: Mixed-Use Residential Lot Area: 0.61 acres PARKING REQUIRED: PARKING PROPOSED: Parking spaces, broken down as follows: 1.5 spaces for one bedroom units Handicapped=2 spaces 43 Units x 1.5=65 parking spaces Regular--41 spaces 1 space/10 du Compact=0 spaces 43 Units/10=5 parking spaces Off-site: =27 Total: 70 parking spaces Total: 70 parking spaces SETBACKS/HEIGHT REQUIRED: SETBACKS/HEIGHT PROPOSED: Front: 0 feet 0 feet Side: n/a 0 & 4 feet Rear: n/a 0 feet Height: min 18 feet/max 45 feet 45 feet ANALYSIS: Compliance with Chula Vista Municipal Code (CVMC) and Urban Core Specific Design Guidelines The City Council adopted the Urban Core Specific Plan (UCSP) to implement the General.Plan's vision for the development of higher density, pedestrian-oriented projects and a broad range of uses that serve the needs of adjacent residents, promote neighborhood activity, and are compatible with adjacent neighborhoods. The adopted UCSP contains more focused objectives and policies, as well as the required regulations and development standards to review and evaluate development projects for consistency with the General Plan's objectives and policies for the area. In addition, the UCSP provides incentives and exceptions for projects that represent the siting of a variety of land uses in an urban enviromzlent that is both pedestrian and environmentally sensitive, and provide a variety of amenities that will increase the quality of life of the neighborhood. The proposed project was reviewed and evaluated based on the General Plan objectives and policies and the UCSP's regulations, development standards, and design guidelines contained in the Urban Core Mid Broadway District. Following is an analysis of the project based on the applicable policies and standards of the UCSP. Planning Commission April 25,2018 Page No.4 The required findings are made as follows: 1. The proposed development will not adversely affect the goals and objectives of the Specific Plan and General Plan. The goals and objectives of the General Plan and Specific Plan are not adversely affected by the project. The project as proposed implements the General Plan and Specific Plan by providing a residential use on Church Avenue. The intent of the General and Specific Plans is to facilitate and encourage development and improvements that will help realize the cormnunity's vision for the Urban Core area. The Urban Core and the Village District are envisioned to be vibrant, forward-thinking but respectful of its past and alive with thriving businesses, attractive housing and entertainment, cultural and recreational activities. The Urban Core Vision aims to create a uniquely identifiable Urban Core for Chula Vista that is an economically vibrant, pedestrian-oriented and multi-purpose destination. The proposed project meets these goals and objectives because it brings improvements and community benefits to an area of Church Avenue which is currently under-performing and not living up to the stated vision of the Specific Plan. This project has the potential to spur additional development along Church Avenue with additional community and economic benefits. 2. The proposed development will comply with all other regulations of the Specific Plan. As indicated in the Development Standards table above, the project complies with all development standards and regulations of the Specific Plan. The building has a maximum height of 45 feet, which is the maximum permitted by the UCSP. The project provides for more than half of the required parking on-site, while paying an in-lieu fee for the remaining parking spaces since the project is located within the Downtown Parking District. Open space and landscaped areas are also provided in excess of the minimum required, as described further below. The building design orients balconies towards the street to provide for an urban enviromnent. Landscaping has been placed along the perimeter of the site and also around the parking lot area. Site Planning and Building Placement/Orientation The Urban Core Specific Plan Design Guidelines promote an attractive and functional arrangement of buildings and open spaces that are sensitive to the physical characteristics of the site that provide a high standard of visual quality and livability for the residents. The guidelines also promote neighborhood compatibility, site access, site design, siting and orientation, setbacks, plaza and open space, and enhanced building elevations. The proposed features throughout the site meet the Urban Core Specific Plan Design Guidelines as described below. In accordance with the UCSP regulations, the residential component shall at a minimum meet the private and common useable open space requirement of the V-1 zone. The proposal includes an attractive and functional arrangement of the building located along the property lines with front door entries and patio/balconies to create a pedestrian friendly environment. Within the active open space area, the rooftop deck provides several pedestrian features such as tables, chairs, BBQ, fire pit, and landscaping for the residents to enjoy. The project also provides either a balcony or a patio for each tenant. A total of 200 square-feet of open space is required for each residential unit. A total of 8,600 square-feet is required. The project meets and exceeds the required open space requirement, by providing 8,644 square-feet of open space for the residents. Planning Commission April 25,2018 Page No. 5 The project also promotes neighborhood compatibility by placing the buildings furthest from the existing commercial development located to the west of the project site. Patios and balconies are placed away from the commercial use to provide privacy for the residents. The building is located directly on the property line along Church Avenue and Center Street to promote a pedestrian friendly environment. There are two main pedestrian access points off Church Avenue via a walkway. While pedestrian access is a design feature in the UCSF, vehicular access is also important in order to offer a variety of ways to access different areas. Dispersion of automobile traffic also has the effect of making areas more pedestrian friendly as cars and pedestrians have less direct interaction. The project provides one vehicular access point to the site from Center Street. Building Design The Urban Core Specific Plan Design Guidelines promote a cohesive architectural theme and building characteristics that provide architectural unity. Buildings should be designed to facilitate pedestrian activity and should include architectural features that reflect the local vernacular and are appropriate to the local climate. The project's architecture is consistent with the policies of the Urban Core Specific Plan Design Guidelines. The proposed modem style architecture includes light and dark colored stucco walls with wood screens, brick siding, lap siding, and balconies. According to the Urban Core Specific Plan Design Guidelines, enhanced elevations should include varying building elements, roof pitches, and setbacks to avoid monotony. h1 addition, distinctive building elements shall be oriented toward the street intersection. Street facing facades are required to incorporate a range of scale-defining elements that relate larger building masses to the scale of the pedestrian. Elements may include trellises, columns, archways, doorways, porches or patios and upper floor balconies and windows. For the proposed project, additional design features such as, wood screens, brick siding, lap siding, and patio/balcony areas, varying building facades and building offsets were added along the exterior elevations to avoid a monotonous design. Parking As discussed herein, the proposed project is located within the UCSP, as well as the Downtown Parking District. The UCSP requires residential projects to provide 1.5 spaces for one bedroom units and 1 space for every 10 dwelling units. Therefore, the required parking for the residential units is 70 spaces. The UCSP also allows projects to provide 50% of the required parking on- site, while the rest can be provided off-site in private and/or public parking lots within 500-ft. of the project site and/or provided as an alternative in lieu. The Downtown Parking District offers the option to pay an In-Lieu-Fee for each of the spaces not provided on site. Onsite parking consists of open parking spaces and carport spaces located around the site. The Applicant has proposed 41 regular parking spaces and 2 handicapped spaces. For the other 27 off-site parking spaces, the Applicant proposes to pay the In-Lieu Parking Fee allowed within the Downtown Parking District and also allowed by the UCSP. The fee will contribute to fund the construction of additional future parking throughout the Downtown Parking District. Planning Commission April 25, 2018 Page No. 6 CONCLUSION The proposed residential project with a four-story building totaling 35,360 square-feet consisting of 43 apartment units is a permitted land use in the V-1 Zone. The proposal complies with the policies, guidelines and design standards for the UCSP. Therefore, staff recormnends the Planning Commission approve Design Review Pennit, DR16-0020 subject to the conditions listed in the attached Resolution. DECISION-MAKER CONFLICTS Staff has reviewed the property holdings of the Planning Commission members and has found no property holdings within 500 feet of the boundaries of the property which is the subject of this action. Consequently, this item does not present a disqualifying real property-related financial conflict of interest under California Code of Regulations Title 2, section 18705.2(a)(11), for purposes of the Political Reform Act (Cal. Gov't Code §87100, et seq.). Staff is not independently aware, and has not been informed by any Plain-ling Commission member, of any other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter. FISCAL IMPACT The application fees and processing costs are borne by the Applicant, resulting in no net fiscal impact to the General Fund or the Development Services Fund Attachments 1. Locator Map 2. Planning Commission Resolution DR16-0020 3. Disclosure Statement 4. Project Plans J:APlannin.-\CarolineADiscretionary Penr its\288 Center Street\PC Staff report OVIA- NORMAN PARK SENIOR CENTER CONGREGATIONAL 7G CHURCH CONGREGATIONAL TOWERS PROJECT THIRDAVENUE LOCATION VILLAGE FIRST SOUTHERN BAPTIST CHURCH Retail S �yRes t Single Family Single Family Bar/Offices Church Parking Lot Offices Offices Offices Ci Offices arking Lot Offices Offices MApRONA ST MEMORIAL PARK C H U L A VISTA PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT LOCATOR PROJECT McNamara Ventures PROJECT DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: DESIGN REVIEW PROJECT 288 Center Street Project Summary: Proposal for a 4 story,43 apartment units with asscociated ADDREss: parking and open space in a.61 acre site. IL SCALE: FILE NUMBER: NORTH No Scale DR16-0020 Related cases: j:\planning\public notices\dr\drl50023.ai\8X10\04.03.18 ATTACHMENT 1 RESOLUTION NO. DR16-0020 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING A DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT DR16-0020 TO CONSTRUCT A FOUR-STORY BUILDING TOTALING 35,360 SQUARE-FEET, CONSISTING OF 43 APARTMENT UNITS WITH ASSOCIATED PARKING AND OPEN SPACE ON APPROXIMATELY 0.61 ACRES LOCATED AT 288 CENTER STREET WHEREAS, on June 13, 2016, a duly verified application for a Design Review Permit was filed with the City of Chula Vista Development Services Department by McNamara Ventures (Applicant); and WHEREAS, the application requests approval of a Design Review Permit to allow constriction of a four-story building totaling 35,360 square-feet consisting of 43 apartment units with associated parking and open space on approximately .61 acres (Project); and WHEREAS, the area of land which is the subject of this Resolution is an existing parcel located at 288 Center Street (Project Site); and WHEREAS, the Development Services Director has reviewed the proposed Project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the proposed Project was adequately covered in the previously adopted Urban Core Specific Plan Final Environmental Impact Report and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program FEIR 06- 01, certified by the Chula Vista City Council in May 2007. Thus, no further environmental review is required; and WHEREAS, the Director of Development Services set the time and place for a hearing on the Design Review Permit application, and notice of the hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City and its mailing to property owners and residents within 500 feet of the exterior boundaries of the property at least 10 days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the Planning Commission and the hearing was thereafter closed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Chula Vista that it hereby makes the following findings: 1. That the proposed Project is consistent with the development regulations and design guidelines of the Urban Core Specific Plan and other applicable regulations contained in the Chula Vista Municipal Code. The Project Site is designated Village Core (V-1) and is peiri itted for residential use. The Project is in compliance with the Urban Core Specific Plan Design Guidelines and is Attachment 2 PC Resolution DR 16-0020 Page 2 April 25,2018 consistent with the Chula Vista Municipal Code. The Applicant is proposing to build a total of 43 units. The building has a maximum height of 45 feet, which is the maximum permitted by the UCSP. The Project provides for more than half of the required parking on-site, while paying an in-lieu fee for the remaining parking spaces since the project is located within the Downtown Parking District. Open space and landscaped areas are also provided in excess of the minimum required. The building design orients balconies towards the street to provide for an urban environment. Landscaping has been placed along the perimeter of the site and also around the parking lot area. Enhanced architectural details are proposed along the street elevations and the layout of the Site provides for a pedestrian oriented design in accordance with the Urban Core Specific Plan Design Guidelines. The floor area ratio and setback requirements are subject to the V-1 zone. The Project meets the zone requirements. 2. That the proposed Project is consistent with the design requirements and recommendations contained in Chapter VII - Design Guidelines of the Urban Core Specific Plan. The proposed Project architecture features a modern architectural design that is eclectic and exemplifies and contributes to the dynamic revitalization and vibrancy along Church Avenue. The building mass is articulated by horizontal and vertical plane offsets, including balconies, which provide variety and interest and are highlighted by accent colors and materials that break up the roof line. The building facades also include a variety of building materials and colors, including wood screens, brick siding, lap siding, patios and balconies, varying building facades and building offsets were added along the exterior elevations to avoid a monotonous design. The overall design, form and scale of the building fit within the guidelines of the Urban Core Specific Plan's Urban Core District and set a strong precedent for firture development planned along Center Street. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Plamling Commission, based on the findings above, hereby approves the Design Review Permit subject to the following conditions: I. The following shall be accomplished to the satisfaction of the Director of Development Services, or designee,prior to issuance of Building Permits, unless otherwise specified: Planning Division I. The Project Site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans, which include site and landscape plans, floor plan, and elevation plan on file in the Development Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, and Chula Vista Municipal Code ("Municipal Code" or"CVMC") Title 19. 2. Prior to, or in conjunction with the issuance of the first Building Permit, the Applicant shall pay all applicable fees, including any unpaid balances of permit processing fees for deposit account DQ-3217. PC Resolution DR 16-0020 Page 3 April 25,2018 3. The colors and materials specified on the Building Plans must be consistent with the colors and materials shown on the Site Plan and materials board approved by the Planning Connmission. 4. A graffiti resistant treatment shall be specified for all wall and building surfaces. This shall be noted for any building and wall plans. Additionally, the Project shall conform to Section 9.20.055 of the Municipal Code regarding graffiti control. 5. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design. 6. All ground mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping. 7. All exterior lighting shall include shielding to remove any glare from adjacent residents. Details for said lighting shall be included in the architectural plans. 8. The Applicant shall obtain approval of a sign permit for each sign. Signs shall comply with all applicable requirements of the Municipal Code. 9. Prior to the issuance of the first Building Permit for the construction of the Project, the Applicant shall pay to the City the amount of$94,500 or the amount in effect, as the In- Lieu-Parking Fee for 27 off-site parking spaces, to the satisfaction of the Development Services Director. Land Development Division/Landscape Architecture Division 10. The following fees may be adjusted based on the final Building Plans submitted a. Sewer Connection and Capacity Fees b. Traffic Signal Fees c. Public Facilities Development Impact Fees (PFDIF) d. Western Transportation Development Impact Fees (WTDIF) e. Other Engineering Fees as applicable per the Master Fee Schedule. 11. Additional deposits or fees in accordance with the City Subdivision Manual, and Master Fee Schedule will be required for the submittal of the following items: a. Grading Plans b. Construction Permit PC Resolution DR 16-0020 Page 4 April 25,2018 12. Payment of the Park Acquisition and Development (PAD) fee per dwelling unit is required in accordance with CVMC 17.10.100. The current PAD fee for West Chula Vista Projects is $7,825 for Multi-Family. The PAD fee is adjusted on an annual basis on October 1 based on the Engineer Construction Cost Index. The payment of the PAD fee amount in place at the time of the issuance of first Building Permit is required. The PAD fee for the Project at this time is $226,925 (62 @ $7,825/unit). Credit will be awarded for existing buildings on the site. 13. The Applicant shall obtain a Land Development Permit prior to beginning any earthwork activities at the site in accordance with Municipal Code Title 15.04. The Applicant shall submit Grading Plans in conformance with the City's Subdivision Manual and the City's Development Stonn Water Manual requirements, including, but not limited to the following: a. Grading Plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer. b. Drainage Study and Geoteclunical/Soils hnvestigations are required with the first submittal of Grading Plans. The Drainage Study shall calculate the Pre- Development and Post-Development flows and show how downstream properties and storm drain facilities are impacted. Design shall incorporate detention of storm water runoff if Post-Development flows exceed Pre- Development flows; analysis shall include flows from 2 year, 10 year, and 50 year return frequency storms. C. Drainage study shall also demonstrate that no property damage will occur during the 100-year storm event. d. Drainage study shall show any offsite flows. e. All onsite drainage facilities shall be private. f. Any offsite work will require Letters of Permission from the offsite property owner(s). 14. The Applicant shall provide 2 copies of the following technical reports with the Is' submittal of Grading Plans: a. Geotechnical Report b. Drainage study c. Storm Water Quality Management Plan (SWQMP) 15. On May 2013, the California Regional Water Quality Control Board for the San Diego Region (SDRWQCB) reissued municipal storm water, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit (Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems Order No. R9- 2013-0001 and as amended by Order Nos R9-2015-0001 & R9-2015-0100 [MS4 Permit]) that covered its region. 16. A PDP Storm Water Quality Management Plan (PDP SWQMP) must be submitted with all back up documentations for review and approval prior to planning approval. Storm water requirements directly affect the layout of the Project. Therefore, storm water PC Resolution DR]6-0020 Page 5 April 25, 2018 requirements must be considered from the initial project planning phases, and will be reviewed with each submittal, beginning with the first submittal. 17. Permanent storm water requirements, including site design, source control, treatment control, and hydromodification control Best Management Practices (BMPs), all as shown in the approved PDP SWQMP, shall be incorporated into the project design, and shall be shown on the plans. The Applicant shall provide sizing calculations and specifications for each BMP. Any structural and non-structural BMP requirements that cannot be shown graphically must be either noted or stapled on the plans. 18. All construction sites are required to implement Construction BMPs in accordance with the performance standards outlined in Appendix K of the BMP Design Manual. In general: a. For projects disturbing less than one (1) acre, a Construction Storm Water Pollution Control Plan (CSWPCP) is required that identifies the pollution prevention measures that will be taken to comply with City standards. 19. The Applicant shall enter into a Storm Water Management Facilities Maintenance Agreement to perpetually maintain all permanent BMPs located within the Project prior to issuance of any Grading, Construction or Building Permits, whichever occurs first. 20. The Applicant shall submit a detailed Operation & Maintenance (O&M) plan for all permanent BMPs as required by the City Engineer to preserve the intended pollution control and/or flow control performance of the BMP. Upon completion of construction of BMPs/Project, the Applicant shall update/finalize the O&M Plan to reflect constructed structural BMPs with as-built plans and baseline photos. 21. If the Project's total on-site improvements exceed Engineering Threshold of (currently: $57,653.00),per CVMC, Section 12.24.030, then the Applicant shall be required to obtain a Construction Permit from the Land Development Section of the Department of Development Services. (The On-Site Improvements Trigger for Installation of Public Improvements is adjusted on an amoral basis on July 1 based on the Engineer Construction Cost Index, See Attachment). A Construction Permit is required to perform the following work in the City's right-of-way, which may include, but is not limited to: (For Commercial, Industrial and Multifamily Residential, the following applies: 1. Limits the cost of reconstructing existing street improvements to meet current standards to 25%of the building permit valuation. 2. Requires Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) pedestrian improvements in the right of way, if any are lacking or substandard. The required ADA improvements would be limited to 20% of the building permit valuation.) a. Removal and replacement of any broken or damaged curb, gutter, and sidewalk per SDRSD G-2, and G-7 along the project's frontage to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Sidewalk shall be designed and constructed with proper transitions to existing conditions. PC Resolution DR 16-0020 Page 6 April 25,2018. b. Removal and replacement of existing driveway(s) meeting design standards as shown in Chula Vista Construction Standard CVCS-1B. Current Driveway(s) shall be replaced, if it does not meet the City of Chula Vista Design Standards/ADA Standards, or if existing driveway is cracked or broken. Dedication of R/W as needed in order for driveway to comply with (American Disability Act) ADA requirements. c. Removal and replacement of existing pedestrian ramp on the corner of Church Avenue and Center Street per Chula Vista Constriction Standard CVCS-25. Current pedestrian ramp shall be replaced, if it does not meet the City of Chula Vista Design Standards/ADA Standards, or if existing pedestrian ramp is cracked or broken. d. Relocation of a 100-watt City standard street light per CVCS-6, 7, 9, & 11 at the Project property line along Church Avenue and Center Street. The City Traffic Engineer shall approve street light location. e. Installation of one driveway(s) meeting design standards as shown in Chula Vista standard detail CVCS-1B. Dedication of R/W as needed in order for driveway to comply with American Disability Act(ADA) requirements. f. Installation of sewer manhole per SDRSD S-2 is required at the connection of the 6" sewer lateral to the main public sewer line. g. Removal and replacement of any broken or damaged concrete within the alleyway as determined by Public Works Inspectors. The alleyway shall be designed and constructed with proper transitions to existing conditions. Current alleyway shall be replaced and removed, if existing concrete is cracked or broken. 22. A complete set of Signing and Striping Plans shall be included with the Street Improvement Plans for review by Traffic Engineering. 23. Separate permits for other public utilities (gas, electric, water, cable, telephone) shall be required, as necessary. 24. Any improvements in the right-of-way beyond the Project limits shall be designed and constricted as to not interfere with adjacent businesses, as approved by the City Engineer, or designee. 25. The construction and completion of all improvements and release requirements shall be secured in accordance with Section 18.17.170 of the Municipal Code. 26. The Applicant shall provide sewer lateral and storm drain comlections to existing public utilities. The Public Works Operations Section will need to inspect any existing sewer laterals and connections that are to be used by the Project. The Applicant shall replace any laterals and connections that need replacement as a result of this inspection. 27. For the proposed private sewer facilities, manholes shall be used where 6" mains or larger are connected to public sewer. PC Resolution DR16-0020 Page 7 April 25, 2018 28. The onsite sewer and storm drain system shall be private. All sewer laterals and storm drains shall be privately maintained from each building unit to the City-maintained public facilities. 29. All proposed sidewalks, walkways, pedestrian ramps, and disabled parking shall be designed to meet the City of Chula Vista Design Standards, ADA Standards, and CVMC Title 24 standards, as applicable. 30. Prior to approval of any Engineering Entitlement or issuance of any Building Permit, a Lot Consolidation will be required in order to avoid existing Parcel lines beneath proposed structures, and in order to avoid Reciprocal Easements for access, parking and drainage. 31. The Applicant shall remove and replace any broken or damaged concrete within the alleyway to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The alleyway shall be designed and constructed with proper transitions to existing conditions. 32. The Applicant shall submit full Landscape and Irrigation Plans for review and approval by the City's Landscape Architect. Fire Department 33. The Applicant shall apply for required Building Permits. Permits shall comply with applicable codes and requirements, including but not limited to: the current California edition of Building Code (CBC), Fire Code (CFC), Mechanical Code, and Residential Code as adopted and amended by the State of California and the City of Chula Vista. 34. This building cannot be constructed of Type VB construction type as it exceeds the allowable number of stories per CBC Table 503 for Group R-2 even when the sprinkler system is increased. The minimum construction type for a 4-story Group R-2 building is Type VA when the sprinkler system is upgraded to a commercial system (NFPA 13). 35. For 34,322 square-feet of Type VB construction, this project will require a fire flow of 5,000 gallons per minute for a 4-hour duration at 20 p.s.i. 36. Based upon the required fire flow for Type VB construction type, a minimum of 5 fire hydrant(s) are/is required to serve this Project. 37. This Project is to be protected throughout by an approved automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13 due to the building exceeding allowable number of stories for a 4-story building of Type VA constriction type. 38. The Project shall provide a Fire Control Room in accordance with Chula Vista Fire Department (CVFD) standard details. PC Resolution DR16-0020 Page 8 April 25,2018 39. This Project is to be protected throughout by an approved fire alarm system. II. The following on-going conditions shall apply to the Project Site as long as it relies on this approval: 1. The Applicant shall install all landscaping and hardscape improvements in accordance with the approved Landscape Plan. 2. Approval of the Design Review Permit shall not waive compliance with any sections of Title 19 of the Municipal Code, nor any other applicable laws and regulations in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 3. The Property Owner and Applicant shall and do agree to indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless City, its City Council members, Planning Commission members, officers, employees and representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands, claims and costs, including court costs and attorney's fees (collectively, liabilities) incurred by the City arising, directly or indirectly, from (a) City's approval and issuance of this Design Review Permit, (b) City's approval or issuance of any other pen-nit or action, whether discretionary or non-discretionary, in connection with the use contemplated on the Project Site and (c) any environmental determinations for the Project. The Property Owner and Applicant shall acknowledge their agreement to this provision by executing a copy of this Design Review Permit where indicated below. The Property Owner's and Applicant's compliance with this provision shall be binding on any and all of the Property Owner's and Applicant's successors and assigns. 4. This Design Review Permit shall become void and ineffective if not utilized within three years from the effective date thereof, in accordance with Section 19.14.600 of the Municipal Code. III. GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 66020(d)(1) NOTICE Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the 90-day period to protest the imposition of any impact fee, dedication, reservation, or other exaction described in this resolution begins on the effective date of this resolution and any such protest must be in a manner that complies with Section 66020(a) and failure to timely follow this procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void or annul imposition. The right to protest the fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions does not apply to planning, zoning, grading, or other similar application processing fees or service fees in connection with this project; and it does not apply to any fees, dedication, reservations, or other exactions which have been given notice similar to this, nor does it revive challenges to any fees for which the statute of limitations has previously expired. PC Resolution DR16-0020 Page 9 April 25,2018 IV. EXECUTION OF RESOLUTION OF APPROVAL The Property Owner and Applicant shall execute this document signing on the lines provided below, indicating that the Property Owner and Applicant have each read, understood and agreed to the conditions contained herein, and will implement same. Upon execution, this document shall be signed and returned to the City's Development Services Department. Signature of Property Owner Date Printed Name of Property Owner Date Signature of Applicant Date Printed Name of Applicant Date V. CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE OF CONDITIONS If any of the foregoing conditions fail to occur, or if they are, by their terms, to be implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to revoke or modify all approvals herein granted, deny, or further condition issuance of all future building permits, deny, revoke, or further condition all certificates of occupancy issued under the authority of approvals herein granted, institute and prosecute litigation to compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. Failure to satisfy the conditions of this permit may also result in the imposition of civil or criminal penalties. VI. INVALIDITY; AUTOMATIC REVOCATION It is the intention of the Planning Conunission that its adoption of this Resolution is dependent upon the enforceability of each and every tern, provision and condition herein stated; and that in the event that any one or more terms, provisions or conditions are determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, this resolution and the permit shall be deemed to be automatically revoked and of no further force and effect. PC Resolution DR16-0020 Page 10 April 25,2018 Presented by: Approved as to form by: Kelly Broughton Glen R. Googins Director of Development Services City Attorney PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, this 25th day of April 2018,by the following vote, to-wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Gabe Gutierrez, Chair ATTEST: Patricia Laughlin, Secretary J:APlanning\CarolineADiscretionary Permits\288 Center Street\DR16-0020 PC Reso ` � Deve | oprnant Serviceo Departmen1 Planning Division | Development Processing MY Of" CHULA VISTA APPLICATION APPENDIX B Disclosure Statement I ° Pursuant tmCity Council Policy 1Ol'Ol,prior toany action *namatter that requires discretionary action 6vthe Qty [ound|,MunningCommission nrother o�da|>og{dCity, statement m[dbc|nsureofcertain ownerships,financial interest,payments,and campaign contributions must bufiled, The following information must be disclosed: I, List the names o[all persons having ofinancial interest|nthe project that iothe subject cfthe application,project or contract (e.g,,owner,applicant,contractor,subcontractor, material supplier). Keegan McNamara 2. If any person* Identified in section 1.above is a corporation or partnership,list the names of all individuals with an-investment of$2OOOo,more|nthe business(corpvration/partnemh|p) entity, 3. If any person*identified in iection 1.above is a non-profit organization or trust, list the names of ! any person who i«the director of the non-profit organization wrthe names of the trustee,beneficiary and truster of the trust, ! ' 4. Please identify every person, Including any agents,employees, consultants,orindependent contractors, whom you have authorized to represent you before the City|nthis matter, '--' 5. Has any person *|den6Oe6in l~2.,3.,or4.,above,nrotherwise associated with this contract,project or application,had any financial dealings with an official" ofth City of Chula | this copyact,project or application within the past 12 months? e �� No | ! ' If yes,briefly describe the nature ofthe financial interest the official—may have |nthis contract. ` 4of9 3N | 276 Fourth Avenue i Chula Vista California! | 91910 | (619) 691.51011 _ Rev"'..14] Attachment '. . . '. D e v e / m p m e n t S e r v i c e s D a p a r 1 m e n t Planning Division | Development Processing MY OF CHULA VISR APPLICATION APPENDIX Disclosure Statement Page 2 6. Has any person flclentified in 1.,2.,3.,or 4.,above,or otherwise associated with this contract,project or application,made a campaign contribution of more than $250withinthe past (72) month�toa current member of the City of Chula Vista Council 7 Yes N o ><' if yes which council member? 7^ Has any person*Identified )n Y,2,],u,4.,above,urotherwise associated with this contract'p«�ectorapp||cadon,provided moethan $42O(or an �em*fequivalent value) toan oR|c|a| °«ftheCity»f Chula Vista |othe past(72) months? (This Includes any payment that confers apersonal benefit«»the r*dPientu rebate ordiscount inthe Price` hingofvalue, mnn��to retire legal debt, gift, loan,etc') yes _ N _ r |fYes,Which nf8da|** and what was the nature ofthe Item provided? 4. Has any person*identified in 1., 2.,3.,or4,above,orotherwise associated with this � co t'ac� p'«]ectorepp|ication,baenomou,cemF/ncomeof$ �~ moreC*au �0d�|* o��h��ityu�Lh«|aV\mt* |nth ePast (l2) mnnthu7 Yes _ N� Ifyes,which official** and the nature o[the item provided? Date *f o n yp ^ Person /xidentified as:any individual,firm,co-puMnerd,ip,joint venture, uoodation social club, fraternal organization,corporation,estate,trust receiver,syndicate,any other county, 6 association, district,or other political subdivision,or any other group or combination acting as a unit, ** official includes,but|xnot limited to: Mayor,Council member, Planning Commissioner, k4emb � board, cornmiadonurcommittee ofthe CitKand City employee or»taffmembers, e'» a *** Thb disclosure Statement must becompleted at the time the project application, or contract, submitted i�ed to City processing, y|,gidotivebodv. Last Updated: March 76,2010 500 276 Fourth Avenue / Chula Vista California/ | 9l9iV 1 (619) 691.5101 '4➢� i r,,JTY OF U-A VISTA ENGI EEPING DEP 2016 APR 24 P11 T err, •' C �r��r,�� file.� .��c��s L� ��7'��` �' /*�- 41 "Lf Rei, �� R Af �reaAd 7" 44/ G y 40. w xo f My name is Joseph A. Raso I am here in support oft 43 unit McNamara Venture apartment complex it a word of caution. I have witnessed over a period of 63 years, ("hula Vista grow from a little sleepy to of 25,000 to a bustling community of a quarter of a million. I have enjoyed. how we managed to preserve downtown's quaint village atmosphere. Today, not only do we have the responsibility to preserve Downtown's unique character, but this commission has a once in a lifetime opportunity to create in Downtown a truly distinctive living, shopping and dining expenencc. We all know the two critical ingredients necessary to create such a family friendly atmosphere are: 1) Mixed Use (where people and live, work and shop in the same neighborhood) and 2) Small Project Development (that of and Pop Store, with the h.omy three for four residential units upstairs) Many buildings in downtown are very old and have long passed their economic usefulness. Most properties are small (some as little as 20' by ')® Fortunately these are the very ingredients is are needed to encourage Small Project Development. Unfortunately, the parking requirements under current City building codes makes it flat out illegal to demolish small obsolete structures and build modern mixed use buildings. Since it is impossible provide parking on the majority of small downtown lots, Current City building codes prohibit the development of small projects. This policy has created and situation where only large building projects are permitted setting the stage the inevitable introduction of chain stores FOREVER destroying the Hometown character of our community. This picture below is but one example of an antiquatedstructure i need of replacement. The owner has been attempting to demolish and replace this building withis se project forthirteen years, only to be prohibited by city codes. v " Y � �i i/7m"%Jir✓iirj�/`� t ���fy? �IJij1rij �1 " ;,. % u ���(%ry�i�;% ii/9�/ �i�l�l��%i✓ri llai��rir yr iFli�yr , This need not be. Downtown Chula ista could verywell be the ext little Italy .. a balancedcommunity where thousands o eo e could shop, live, work and play. There are plenty of small time entrepreneursilli to invest in our community if only they were of prohibited fromi so by city codes which do nothing ut prohibit Small Project Developments. There is no magic bullet to revitalize our Downtown. However, the elimination oft e impossible to fulfill r° i requirements of small "Mom Pop" properties could possibly plant the sees for beautiful vi r t community for many years to come. Thank REQUEST TO SPEAK CHUI A VISTA PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: f Wish to spear: Staff Recommendation: Public Comments 4DYes ❑ Support OR ❑ No ❑ Oppose Agenda Item# CITY OF RESIDENCE- 00 a NAME: ,55(. REPRESENTING: ADDRESS(Optional;to be used for staff contact purposes only): ' TELEPHONE (Optional; to be used for staff contact purposes only): ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: Please give this request to the Board Secretary. ***The Chair will indicate the amount of time allotted for spearing. Thank you for participating in this meeting ♦ Please see reverse for additional information „, _ REQUEST TO SPEAK u CHULA VISTA PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: Nish to speak: Staff Recommendation: Public Comments Oyes "'Support OR ry ❑ No ❑ Oppose Agenda Item.4 , CITY OF RESIDENCE: go O NAME: 0,AA REPRESENTING: .ADDRESS(Optional;to be used for staff contact purposes only): TELEPHONE (Optional; to be used for staff contact purposes only): ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: Please give this request to the Board Secretary. ***The Chair will indicate the amount of time allotted for spearing. Thank you for participating in this meeting ♦ Please see reverse for additional information REQUEST TO SPEAK `= CHUI,A VISTA PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: 411 Wish to spear: Staff Recommendation: Public Comments Yes ❑ Support OR - - 11 No ❑ Oppose Agenda Item 74 lit CITY OF RESIDENCE: , "All NAME: AXA-/ 4 (01 o REPRESENTING: ADDRESS(Optional;to be used for staff contact purposes only): TELEPHONE (Optional; to be used for staff contact purposes only): ADDITIONAL CONLMLENTS: "VallZiv � Please give this request to the Board Secretary. ***The Chair will indicate the amount of time allotted for spearing. Thank you for participating in this meeting ® Please see reverse for additional information REQUEST TO SPEAK CIIUI.,A VISTA P IN COMMISSION DATE: Wishto speak: Staff Recommendation: Public Comments �Kyes ❑ Support OR ❑ No ❑ Oppose Agenda Item f CITY OF RESIDENCE: r✓ NAME: 7 REPRESENTING: ADDRESS(Optional;to be used for staff contact purposes only): TELEPHONE (Optional; to be used for staff contact purposes only): �- ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: Please give this request to the Board Secretary. ***The Chair will indicate the amount of time allotted for speaking. Thank you for participating in this meeting ♦ Please see reverse for additional information REQUEST TO SPEAK CHULA VISTA PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: Wish to speak: Staff Recommendation: Public Comments -- ❑ Yes "Support OR - -- ^ No ❑ Oppose Agenda Item# CITY OF RESIDENCE: "°` t - NALYIE: k At & sW A tc REPRESENTING: YA Y.5-54 F' ADDRESS(Optional;to be used for staff contact purposes only): ' TELEPHONE (Optional; to be used for staff contact purposes only): ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: 77 1012 c) Please give this request to the Board Secretary. ***The Chair will indicate the amount of time allotted for speaking. Thank you for participating in this meeting ♦ Please see reverse for additional information