Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1964-03-25 PC MINS MINUTES OF A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA March 25, 1964 A special meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Chula Vista was held at 7:30 P. M. in the Council Chamber at the Civic Center on the above date with the following members present: Comstock, Wilhite, Adams,Stevenso and Guyer. Absent: Members Stewart and Johnson. Also Present: Acting Planning Director Warren, Corwin Mocine, Consultant and Junior Planner Lee. The Secretary of the Commission hereby states that she did post within 24 hours of adjournment as provided by law, the order of the Commission for the adjourned meeting of March 16, 1964. Chairman Stevenson opened the public hearing by stating the meeting was for the purpose of presenting the General Plan. He further stated: ''We would appreciate having the comments of any of you in the audience that would care to speak in favor of a particular aspect of the plan or if there is something that you are opposed to, we would like to hear about that, in order that necessary adjustments can be made. So with that, Bruce, do you have any words of wisdom for us ? Bruce Warren: I have some comments. We want to thank those of you who are here, for coming tonight. This is the first of two required public hearings that will be held prior to a recommendation from the Planning Commission concerning the adoption of the General Plan. Next Wednesday night, April 1, we will be holding another public hearing at which the Planning Commission will make recommendations concerning the adoption of the Plan to the present City Council. The present City Council will then meet to discuss this General Plan at which time they will, hopefully, endorse the Plan for the benefit of the new City Council who will hold a public hearing to consider adoption of the Flan in either May or June. The Plan is behind me on the board; it is basic- ally our final General Plan. We had a Sketch Plan, a preliminary approach to the General Plan, presented to us in November of last year and which was circulated among several public agencies and organizations throughout the entire Metropolitan area. The Plan behind me is basically the same Plan that the Sketch Plan was; however, after receiving comments from the general citizens on the Sketch Plan, some changes have been made and other changes considered. Hopefully tonight, from the comments we receive from-you people and next Wednesday night, the Planning Commission will be able to offer re- commendations on the adoption of the final plan to the Council. Mr. Corwin Mocine of the consulting firm of Williams and Mocine of San Francisco is here tonight to present the General Plan to the Planning Commission and the public after which public comment will be received. Tonight the Planning Commission will make no decision on this, but will receive your comments and will consider them for future recommendations. The report which has been handed out to most of you, is a brief memorandum report. The final report will be much more comprehensive than this; it will be published prior to the public hearing by the new City Council in May or June. This outlines the basic goals and concepts of the General Plan, and as I said, will be expanded upon in the future. At this point I will turn the meeting over to Corwin Mocine for his presentation. Corwin Mocine: Thank you Mr. Warren. Chairman and Members of the T11-------- - --------- ------ r _-1___ --a !"_.......�1...,.,.-- 44- 4 - _.-. , -1„-, -- -4- 4-- ho 1, having worked in this community now for nearly two years and having met with many of you before at public meetings that we've had. To have reached this stage where we feel we are ready to present to you the re- sults of our work with some sense of finality of firmness about the re- commendations which we are prepared to make to you. I think it might be worth taking a minute of time to start off by saying what a Master Plan, or General Plan. What it is, what it attempts to do and perhaps equally important, what it isn't. In our way of working with Planning in this country in the United States, we have developed a two or three stage process, two or three stage setup of tools and devices with which we accomplish our Plan. The longest range, most far-reaching, most general kind of planning for the long-range development of the com- munity is what we call the General Plan. This 'is what we have here to- night. This attempts to deal with the City fifteen or twenty years in ad- vance, and the reason for this faiirly long-range view is because. we find in the United States that cities, while they are changing or growing, are changing and growing in a fairly regular, slow, orderly sort of rate and that if one wants to accomplish really important improvements and changes in the community, one has to take the fairly long-time scale into view; however, you're always dealing only with details only with short-range values, only with short-range goals. So the first stage of our three-tier planning process is this long-range Plan which we have here tonight. Next, we usually find in communities, and I'm sure this will be true here in Chula Vista, that following the preparation and hopefully, the adoption of the General Plan, the community will want'to turn its attention to the various parts of the City. , On a more immediate basis, maybe half the time span of the General Plan. More precision, more detail, more immediacy, more concern with tomorrow's or next week's or next year's problems, but still fitting in to the overall objectives, the overall goals that we already set up in the General Plan itself. Then finally we have two or three actual legal devices of which probably the one most familar to most of you is the zoning ordinance which deals with the uses of land, and the uses of buildings today and tomorrow and next week and a very precise, very exact, way in terms of actual legal regulations. Hopefully, this zoning ordinance, after the adoption of the Plan and perhapsthe preparation of some district plans, some shorter range plans, this zoning ordinance will then be brought into conformity insofar as is possible to do so with the General Plan so that it may act as an instrument, as a tool, as a device for moving the community along the .road towards the accomplishment of these goals which the community has decided to set for itself in the General Plan. This then, perhaps, brings us in a fairly logical way (to,_Sconside ration of what the goals of the community might be, because Planning by definition is the establ' ishment of a process, or the establishment of a set of policies for the. achievement of what we agree to be the objectives of what we have in mind for ourselves. . And so, one of the first steps in developing a Plan for a city is to reach some agreement on what the city wants to accomplish, and the Plan can set its mind toward the accomplishment of those objectives. Now, after a good deal of discussion first with a broad citizen's committee of whom some members of you in the audience were undoultedly members and participated in those meetings, then discussion with the Planning Commission over a period of a couple of years, finally various public meetings that we had in the past, we have developed a set of goals or objectives for this community which seem to us, as your Consultants, to represent what we take to be your thinking about your city. These goals, we hope, will find a response among you, and if they don't , well, it is very important that we hear about this. I want to very quickly go over the objectives of what this Plan encompasses because to under- stand what we proposed in the Plan, it is necessary first to understand what we are trying to accomplish by it. We.have set out, as we understand it, your objectives in five specific directions. First, to improvedand expand the economic base of the community, This has to do with the welfare, the economic welfare of the. City with the jobs +that are available, with the tax resources which the community has to support its schools and public services; with the kind of services, public services, in terms of stores and personal and public services available to the people in the community, all these things and we particularly felt that this was worthy of note because there are some signs and our research report, which some of you may have copies of, and which all of you could get copies of by asking the Commission. . . . our research report indicates there are some problems in this city in terms of the economic base. The unemployment rate is higher than it is in the State as a whole, that the jobs and industry, for instance, are sharply concentrated in one particular kind of industry without proper diversity. In other words, there the community faces some needs in this direction and the Plan ought to respond to. Second, to preserve and enhance the residential quality of Chula Vista. This was made an objective of the Plan because I think the first thing we were told when we came here to begin our work for you was that this town was known as a "nice place to live. " And that this was one of the things that they wanted to continue to be known for, and that it was important that what- ever we did, these qualities. of this community be preserved. We hope that the Plan pays proper attention to these values. As a third objective, to provide attractive, convenient public facilities to serve the anticipated population. There are two parts to this, first that we find again by the studies that we made of the community and comparing it with others with more or less generally accepted standards that there are some areas in which security does not come up to what are considered to be the best standards of the day in terms of, for instaiice, park and re- -3- creation areas for one thing, and perhaps some streets and arterials m for another. But that is a manageable kind of a thing, circulation syste no great problem if the population were not also growing in such a rapid rate. Within this planning area as shown on the map here, our studies today indicate somewhere just under 60, 000 people living as of now, and by the end of the planning period, approximately 20 years hence, we est- imate, and we think rather conservatively, that the population of this area will be about three times -- somewhere between 2-1/2 and 3 times the population of the present or presently in the area today. So it isn't just the matter of meeting some accepted standards in terms of today's population, it is one of these situations where you are going to have to run fast in order to stand still. To meet these needs, it is necessary to plan for expand for appropriate and adequate public services. Fourth, to develop an efficient system of streets and highways serving the City and linking the City to ;the metropolitan area and to Mexico. This ties back to some of the others because in order to establish an appropriate economic base, for instance, it is going to be very important that there be good transportation into the City, through the City and between the City and other parts of the area. One of the latent resources here is clearly the tourist resource, and the tourist resource is related not only to Chula Vista but also to.ethe Bay, to San Diego and to old Mexico. This means that the attention of Chula Vista must not only be on its own internal cir- culation system but upon its relationship to its regional and even state- wide network. Finally, and number five, to preserve and enhance the beauty of this City which we see as being taking part in its relation to the Bay to the mountains behind, to its rather unique, in terms of California communities, clear definition of topography, bounded as it is by the water on one side and the mountains on the other and the two great river valleys at each extremity in such a way that it has the possibility of achieving a real sense of coherence, a sense of individuality, a sense of special quality which will set it apart from the run of California Cities. I might say, at the same time here again there are some special problems which need to be met, not the least of which is the fact that we're living here in essentially a desert community. The last few days to the contrary notwithstanding, the fact that some green space, the need for street trees, the need for proper attention to the preservation of the attractive views of lakes and water, the protection of the drainage ways - these kinds of things will do much to enhance over the dry years, as well as the wet, the quality of the community as a community. Now, this very briefly then has to do with the basic objectives of the Plan and as I go over the main proposals of the Plan, I will try to refer back to these from time to time to show you where we feel that some of these things tie in with some of the objectives that we set forth. They are set forth at more length in the report that we have given you and we have suggested rather specific ways in which some of these may be re- -4- flected in actual community policies or future developments. Now if I may, I will take a look at the Plan drawing or the Map here on the board and try to explain to you how all this rather general discussion that I have been giving you translates into fairly specific suggestions and recommendations for the development of the City. First, let me say that I think very properly our assignment was made much bigger than the existing City. Most of you will recognize that the city limits of Chula Vista are roughly somewhere along this line and that the Map shows an area roughly three times as large as the existing city. It was the agreement of ourselves and the city fathers who employed us that this area shown here .generally in the colored are on the map represented what you might say the natural area of development or growth or expansion of this community; and as such ought to be planned as a whole. We shouldn't allow ourselves to be trapped into concerning ourselves only with the area within the present city limits. Here is the Otay Valley, . here roughly the Sweetwater Valley, here the lakes and steeper.mountains, and here of course, the Bay and within those general boundaries is the area which we have been concerned and for which this Plan makes long-range proposals. There are some parts of it of course outside the city limits will depend for their carrying out on either the areas being annexed to Chula Vista which we hope over the period of time will happen, or that the County of San Diego will see fit to respect this Plan and translate some of its re- commendations into their zoning and streets and other kinds of specific proposals. Now perhaps as a way of talking about this Plan we might divide the City into four or five rather general areas and discuss with you what the Plan proposes within the several parts of the City. First, let's talk about the western most part of the City, the shores and the Bay, in a sort of a crescent running around up the two valleys approxi- mately to the freeway and perhaps to Fourth Street and taking in the Chula Vista tidelands and roughly running back as far as the railroad or the free- way. This area, the waterfront area of Chula Vista, is largely designated for industrial development. This would be a combination of both light in- dustry shown by this light blue color, and more intensive or heavy industry, shown by the dark blue color. Where we have indicated reserve in a couple of locations, an area which we think is ultimately destined for industrial development but which we don't believe is likely to come into industrial use within the time span of twenty years which this plan attempts to look for. Now this area of industrial development balance as it is between heavy and light industry, is one of the,key.ways in which we believe that the community can actually improve and diversify its industrial base, and thereby improve its economic welfare. We think that with the moving of the railroad onto the waterfront, with the location of a heliport here, with the proper ties back into the community in two or three locations we have indicated, that this can be an extremely -5- valuable resource. We think that especially in the areas back closer to the community in both sides here, that there ought to be reserved and developed areas for very high quality of research and development kind of industry of the sort which will bring new jobs and avery desirable jobs into the community without necessarily adding to, for instance, adding to the industrial waste and the air pollution and the other things which may be undesirable in industrial development. It is important to point out, however, that although the principal uses of the waterfront area are industrial that we have also provided here at the foot of "J" Street for a marine and recreational point of contact with the Bay. We have referred this Plan to the Port of San Diego and have found they agree with this scheme and they are hopefully willing and able to develop this recreational center over the next few years so that the people of Chula Vista will have an attractive place to keep and to launch boats, to find opportunities for finding boats to go deep sea fishing, for picnicking and other things that one does on the edge of the water. A point of contact with the salt water which this City today lacks even though it is a water- front City. With the remarkable recreational development of San Diego Bay, it seems to us very important that this be respected and provided for in the Plan. The heliport I mentioned, let me say just in passing, that one after another of the major metropolitan areas of the United States are finding that helicopter service between the main population centers of a metropolitan complex, a metropolitan region, and between those centers and perhaps the main airport are increasingly important. I find myself, for instance, taking the .helicopter between Berkeley and the San Francisco airport, more and more now as the easiest and even the cheapest way to go about my work and I am sure this will be something that will happen here, especially in this land where you hardly can look up into the sky without seeing a helicopter flying around. S o it seems very natural that this would come and it ought to be provided for. Now let's turn our attention next to an area, say an area between the free- ways and between the proposed South Bay freeway down the Sweetwater Valley and "H" Street, this area, which constitutes the old historic part of Chula Vista, and which in many ways will continue to be the most im- portant central section of the community. Here we expect to see some fairly substantial changes over a period of years. These changes are already in evidence; one can see them happening almost every time I come to town where more evidence of these processes going on. Most of you will recognize that the colors here are fairly dark browns and yellows which represent as you look at the key over here, high density and medium high density and medium density residential development. Although historically, this whole area was developed as a single-family residence area, there is, as I said before, plenty of evidence already at hand and an increased multiple residence development in this part of the city is strongly at work. We think that this is a trend that is not disadvantageous to the community; one way that communities can grow in the population scale that I indicated a few -6- moments ago, is in terms of increasing density in.those parts of the community that are best related, best adapted for increased multiple residence use and clearly the olderi.more level part of the city best served with street networks, best served with transit, best served with shopping and schools, libraries, hospitals and all the rest, is the part of City where this kind of multiple residence intensive use of residential land can most likely and most logically take place. Also, the future develop- ment of the Civic Center with this cultural and recreational attributes as well as the Third Avenue shopping center can best be enhanced by an intensification of a residential development in that immediate surroundings to provide a market, to provide users, to provide convenient access to those facilities for the people who live in those multiple-family units. So we have a rather limited, but in terms of Chula Vista, a fairly ex= tensive area of this fairly deep ground of density which is shown over here as very high density which means 16 to 30 families or perhaps 60 to 75 persons per acre and which means probably, ultimately that the majority of the area although not every lot, by any means, will be developed with some sort of multiple story apartment developments. Not all high rise apartments, because we are too far out from the .heart of the metropolitan center. of San Diego to expect that, but nevertheless, a rather intensive high density development. Next to that, between Third Avenue and Broadway for the mos t part and this area between Broadway and the Freeway, we have shown what we call high density which is from 8 to 15 families per acre and here to get the number of people you ought to multiply by about three which would be anywhere from 24 to-45 persons per acre. And then finally, an area of more upland area as you get into the beginnings of the rising land and into the newer part of the community, what we have called medium density which would be 4 to 7 families per acre or anywhere from 12 to 18 people per acre and which would generally represent a combination of single=family residence with some duplexes, small limited number of small apartment houses. You will notice, that in all of this, I have emphasized the mix and not the exact nature of a particular building type; in other words, this is not a zoning ordinance and this does not effect the zoning of any particular piece of property. These colors on this map are not meant to indicate for instance that everything within this brown area is going to be six stories high and everything in this reddish brown area is going to be three stories high and everything in this yellow area is going to be duplexes in every lot-- far from it, what we're talking about here is some sort of an average on the basis of which we can establish the needs for schools, for parks, for shopping, for street facilities, for all the services which go to support a residential neighborhood. The zoning o.rdinanee which I referred to in the beginning of my remarks will later have to translate these average densities into specific particular lot zones. At that time, the makeup of this mix will be worked out. . Some streets may very well be left single- family and some different levels of multiple, but we expect over a period of time that the average will come out about as shown here. Now, all -7- these people living in this part of the community will be well-served by the commercial center of Chula Vista. This commercial center in Chula Vista as it works out, this is a development in the last few years which most of you are aware of as I am, works out in a two-part, or if you want to take in Unimart, maybe a three-part kind of a pattern. First we have Third Avenue here, historic part of the City, which was always downtown for the last 40 years in this community and which in many ways continues to be, where the main banks are, where the main professional and service offices are, where the financial institutions are located. Recently; we find the retail activities which were once concentrated here to the exclusion almost of anywhere else in the community, have found new locations; principally here in the Chula Vista shopping center, to. some extent here, and even in the future as 'time goes on in many other new centers through- out the community. This doesn't mean, necessarily, a net loss; it simply means a change and emphasis of activity and we will, as part of our re- sponsibilities to the community before we are finished with our work for you, make some specific recommendations about the development of the Civic Center-Third Avenue area pointing out the Avenues for future growth and development for new activities, for new service and useful- ness seful- ness to the community which lie open to that area which will allow it to continue to be a vital and important part of ;the .City. However, it's useless to pretend that there has not been some change in patterns parti- cularly reflected by the great development of the Chula Vista center. One can't expect an old, and somewhat planned-in-another day kind of a community, commercial community to complete on an even basis with therczmost*modern shopping center design available to retailers today with two or three major shopping centers in a whole combination of support- ing retail institutions as well as pa-rking and all the rest. I have also emphasized here in the Civic Center that the Plan proposes a expansion here, the first step which has been taken by the City in pur- chasing the school site. The Plan proposes further expansion of the open space in this area in order that the City develop a real cultural and recreation center here to serve all the citizens of the community in the future: perhaps a small civic auditorium, a new library, meeting rooms _ where all kinds of groups and associations in the community, open space to compliment the shopping and office activity of the Third Avenue center and the like. We also see a different kind of a commercial need that the town has to pro- vide for. Principally, along Broadway to some extent along the southern extremity of Third Avenue, to some extent along parts of "E" Street, both' between Broadway and the Freeway, and between Third Avenue and Fourth Avenue. This we call Highway Commercial Use and here we see the kinds of activities being concentrated which depend principally on the automobile for their success. T;:e Here we see automobile dealers themselves, motel and hotel accommodations, various plant and tree nurseries, all kinds .of thugs=which you-nor-a?n -8- things Which you normally expect to find and do find related to the buyer who comes in a car and who expects.to be able to drive along the street to find what he wants. The extension of this, throughout the whole length of Broadwy, parts of Third Avenue, is probably more than would be ideally desirable and if we could think of a good way ;to limit or even to eliminate some of this shoe-string development, we would so recommend but we don't find any way in which we can foresee a change in the situation and therefore, it seems to us most logical to acknowledge it, to plan for it and in every- where that we can, to accommodate it with the best interests in the community and to the best interest of the people that are involved. Now, let's turn our attention to the older, flatter part of the City, lying from "H" Street to the Otay Valley and roughly from bne Freeway to the other. This is generally marked by either medium high, or medium density developments, and this is not too different than what we find here today. We say, therefore, that in this part of the City, probably overall the least changes will take place in the next planning period. This area will fill in the remaining vacant land; it will continue to be principally a single family area with some limited multiple development. There will be more multiples particularly along the southern extremity of Third Avenue; there will be some intensive spots higher density, that is, what we call high medium density at any rate, multiple residence. We'Ve even shown an agriculture reserve continuing into the foreseeable future because these seem to be well-farmedyar�tenriched and economically successful agriculture lands -and we would like to see them continue. We have indicated some areas for future industrial -use, indicated as in- dustrial reserve, which we intend to mean probably industrial use beyond the time span of this Plan. The area shown here for industrial in the blue without the word 'reserve' attached is more than enough, we believe, to accommodate all foreseeable industrial development that will come into this community within the next 20 years and leave a reserve or a safety margin of about a hundred percent. In other words, if we extrapolate in- dustrial jobs, and translate that into a need for industrial acres, we have shown here without considering the reserves, about double what we think are likely to be needed. This isn't unwise because we can't be sure about our projections for one thing, and for another thing, we need enou&hchoice and enough reserve to keep the market flexible so people can find the .land they need whiten they need -it. But we think it would be wise in terms of these reserves that it be the conscious policy of the City not to encourage those going into industrial use until these dthers are more or less filled in. This, for various reasons, industry car/serve itself better and serve the community better if it is more or less concentrated and these lands can be put to good use residentially and even agriculturally in the meantime until the time comes when it is, voluble for them to turn over into industrial uses, thus bringing industrial traffic, industrial land uses, etc. , into new parts of -9- the community. The golfi course we have proposed of course leaving as a major although private property a major resource of the community and we have also suggested some new parks or expansions of existing la, rks as we have in many parks of the City, because as I pointed out earlier, the park lands in this community especially neighborhood and communitylparks do not meet, at the present time, adequate standards. Now, let's turn our attention next perhaps at once in a big over-view to this great expansion area what we might call the foot-hill area east of the Inland Freeway out to the San Miguel Freeway up to the base of the mountains to the lakes to the east. The key to the development of this area as we see it is the new college, the new schools which are already under way, all three of them in this area and the development here of a new commercial center which you might call the heart or the core of this great new Chula Vista to the east. Here we believe that appropriate kinds of garden-apartment and more intensive residential development are making use of the convenience of the shopping center of all the schools, of the college with all the resources it can pro- vide would be very logical. Around that, we see a much lower kind of development made up of medium density, low density and even in this greenish color here on the steeper lands what we call very low density which goes all the way from less than one person per acre on the greenish-yellow to one to three on the bright yellow; this color as I said up to four-.to seven on the ochre yellow in this whole area here. This , of course, if the area which is going to have the greatest change over the period of which this Plan is projected. The change which is all in the future, the change which the community has a chance really to control , to direct, to assure, so that this land which is the only way that Chula Vista can grow will grow in such a way as to be a true credit to the city, something that ; you will be proud to take into your community and be proud of it, and something which you can say carries on the fine traditions which this community has already established. Several principals ought to be emphasized here: one thing is a concern about topography. As we move out into this area, as most of you know, probably better than I , that we are moving out into a fairly rough, rolling, even steep kind of cut-up kind of a landscape, full of deep canyons and full of interesting but rather irregular mesas around hilltops and even quite steep hillsides. We have tried to suggest here on this Plan a pattern of development which respects those differences in topography making the most intensive use of the levelest and flattest parts , keeping the deepest canyons , in fact, open as open space; the more rugged hillsides being reserved for the very low density pattern, sort of small estates where a person can locate a house on the one level site and then have an acre or two or three surrounding it and more rolling country, where we expect to find horses and the thi.ngs that go with country living. So that, in this whole area of the eastern part of the City, shown here fully developed 20 years hence, and it may very well be 30 since the growing capacity which we indicate on this map is more than our anticipated population growth with the City. 10- So we think there is again a reserve here involved of this total. -capacity; here is only a portion of what the capacity of this more intensively developed part of the old part of the City will be. You will expect to find a more open kind of development. We have shown a major span of green space at the bottom of Bonita Valley, partly for a length of open space between the golf space and for flood control reasons. We have suggested a reservation of the shores and lakes for future recreational land. We have also suggested a very extensive agricultural reservation of land. U11tim ately; this agricultural reserve will probably also go into residential use and this should be beyond the period of our Plan. Residential is shown on the rougher land which can't be farmed, and keep the farming on a land which is now completely farmed. Farming remains a major economy for this community and it was so right down to the second World War. There are many advantages of keeping this a green belt, combined with an agricultural land here and open land here, as a sort of a frame around the community so that it doesn ' t melt out indefinitely into the whole metropolitan complex of the greater San Diego. One other thing, we have indicated here in this bright red color at two or three strategic locations what we have called "tourist commercial" activity and here is another effort to improve the economic base of the community to take advantage of the strategic location of Chula Vista between San Diego and the Border; to provide along side the freeways, in attractive locations, in appropriate locations where high quality motel and other types of tourist accommodations; tourist restaurants and that sort of thing might verywell be located, taking advantage of the scenery, of the golf courses of the riding trails , and what not. These may very well be one of the ways in which the economy of the City can get a, major shot in the arm, because tourist money is new money which comes into the City and which is one of the best ways to bol- ster up a community's economy. This is a fairly quick rundown, has to do with the basic land use pattern of the present and the future community. Let me emphasize that all through this -community we have suggested locations for elementary schools , shown here with the little square school houses with the flags on top; the junior high schools , the senior high schools , college, for future park and recreation spaces , fire stations shown by the letter "F" and located in appropriate locations , which I won 't try to point out to you. For new neighborhood shopping centers and strategic street locations , as well as the community shopping center that I mentioned earlier, and this is true not only in this part of the City but in the old part as well . The school here which is located between Broadway and the Freeway, for instance, in an area ultimately designed for industrial - commercial use, we have proposed to relocate into this area between Fourth Avenue and Broadway at such time as it seems appro= priate to do so, and which time children would disappear from this block and the school and the property would go where the children are. Finally, I think I should take a minute or two to talk about the freeway network that serves this whole new complex and I ' ll be finished, and we ' ll have time for some questions and comments. The basic scheme, of course, H founded on the system of freeways. The Montgomery Freeway already existing here, the Inland Freeway located and about to be constructed in this location. The San Miguel Freeway, about which public hearings were held in the -11- last ten days or so up here at the base of the mountains , each of which serves a function in a north-south direction. These are linked together by future, called the long-range future, as is the San Miguel as well - I would guess at least right close to our 20 year planning period, and Otay Freeway. More immediately and under some parts of construction right now is the South Bay Freeway down the Sweetwater Valley. These will serve principally the regional transportation needs to bring traffic to Chula Vista from San Diego and other parts of California, to bring traffic from other parts of the State to old Mexico, to allow Chula Vista people to get in and around the whole metropolitan complex where their jobs and their interests will be. Within the community, of course, we have to reinforce those freeways with a network with primary and secondary thoroughfares , and the plan makes these proposals with a network of east-west streets starting with "E" Street, "H" Street, "L" Street and Orange Street running from north to south and then with Broadway, Fourth Avenue, Hilltop Drive and a new extension of the Otay Lakes Road, at this location running from north to south. Supplementing these major street networks , we have a secondary street network, most of which will be familiar to you in the older part of the City: Third Avenue, "J" Street, Naples Street, Palomar and various streets in this newly developed area, many of which don 't yet exist. Where circles are shown here, we indicate interconnections between this local street network and this freeway system. Where the road goes across the freeway without a circle, we expect that there will be a traffic separation but no access between, or interconnection between the local system and the freeway system. It was pointed out to me that this circle here is an error - our draftsman made a mistake and we didn 't catch it - there would be a connection at "E" Street, one at "H" Street and one at "J" Street, but not one at "G" Street, as shown here. Now I think that pretty well covers that situation. Perhaps I should point out one other thing. We have suggested with some enthusiasm, although with some reserva- tions , the utilization of the power line right of way which extends right across the City, all the way out to the lakes as you can see here. The extension of this as a key element, what can ultimately be an open-space network in the community, this. could become a hiking trail , it could become a riding trail , and it could connect some parts with other parts just bg developing the open land which will forever remain under that tower line. There are places in California where this has been done sur- prisingly well and where the power line striding across the country has actually been put to good use by this means. Now I think, Mr. Chairman, Members of the Commission, Ladies and Gentlemen, this is all I have to say, and I think that if there are questions or comments that I might have any way to answer them, I will be happy to do so. Virgil Stevenson: Thank you very much, Mr. Mocine. Now are there any questions to appear before the public hearing? I know that most of you have seen this several times. The public hearing in this matter has been opened. I might mention that since this meeting is being recorded, we would appreciate that anyone, who has any comments to make, come forward to the microphone, identify yourselves , tell .us where you live and offer anything that comes to your mind - whether you are in favor of this Plan or any element of it, or whether you are opposed to it. Now, I certainly recognize that many of you in attendance may be seeing this for the -12- first time, and it would be difficult for you to comment so rapidly; therefore, the second half of this public hearing, as we mentioned earlier, will be held on the first of April . But for those who have seen it previously and those who have comments , we would certainly appreciate hearing whatever you have to say right now. So, is there anyone in the audience who would care to speak? Stephen Gassaway, speaking for the Sweetwater Valley Civic Association: First off, let me say that the Civic Association appreciated the thoughtfulness of Chula Vista asking people from the Sweetwater Valley to help in preliminary meetings and prelim- inary suggestions , and we are most enthusiastic about this General Plan. We would like to indicate, however, to draw your attention to the flood plain area that on the map indicates tourist accommodations , and if that is to include motels , in this particular location where Highway 241 crosses Bonita Road, at that intersec- tion now is a Baptist Church - that area is in the flood plain and has been innun- dated several times in the last twelve years;and, at one time, a railroad ran by there and was flooded in 1916 - that area was completely washed out. We think that you ought to have another look at that particular intersection as it is in the flood plain. The second area that we would like to draw your attention to is the intersection, of Otay Road and Bonita Road. That has been indicated for high density, and there again, that flat area is subject to innundation. Furthermore, almost the entire area around that particular intersection is of low density character. The Civic Association would like to protest, and at the same time, recommend that those two intersections be given some further attention by the experts with the possibility they might want to modify the map in those two locations. Stevenson: Thank you very much. Is. there anyone else here who would care to speak at this time? Jim Patten, Chula Vista Realty, 580 Third Avenue, Chula Vista: I notice this is a beautiful theory, and I wish it can be developed in this way - immediately west of the college site; if I 'm not mistaken, you have a high-density population, is that the brown area? Stevenson: Yes , that 's true. Patten: Of course, I assume you worked from the topo map. I hope you can get that high-density in there - I don 't believe that you can; as I recall that ground, tried to sell it and found it rough. notice also that there is a lack of neighborhood shopping centers. Now, I have been impressed with the developments in the San Fernando Valley. Pretty near every major thoroughfare going through there, there are along with major intersections, neighborhood shopping facilities where accommodations such as service stations, stores and rather large markets, primarily service stores. I think that we lack this in this particular area. I . would like to point out one, for instance - the intersections of Hilltop and "J" Streets and where Telegraph Canyon Road, which I understand is planned for a major thoroughfare, goes east; you have, I believe, single-family developments there, is that correct? Mocine: Yes. There are two schools on two corners there on medium dens.ity, also on the other two corners. -13- Patten: Right. Now in any direction that you go from there, you are two to three miles away from any facility for convenient shopping. Stevenson: How about the corner of Naples? It 's about two blocks , three-quarters of a mile. Mocine: At Hilltop and "J", you also have the market there. Patten: You have a market, but nothing else. Member Comstock: May I ask a question? What is your definition of a neighborhood shopping facility? Patten: I think the people in these particular areas should have the facility of service stations; what 's that nice name for liquor stores? Comstock: House of Spirits, or something like that. Patten: Yes, a community center, a complete community center. Comstock: Service type stores? Patten: Yes. Mocine: I 'd like to make a comment on that, perhaps .if I might. We 've shown here in either this dark red color or this bright red color, the network of either existing or proposed - out here they 're largely proposed centers which we tried to relate to the anticipated population in such a way that there will be an adequate amount of commercial property to serve the anticipated population. Using fairly accepted standards of the number of families it takes to support different kinds of facilities. The map tends to balance this out so that if you add more, you would be either reducing the market available for some others , or for removing some. There is nothing that says the locations we selected are sacred; it could go to the next intersection one way or another; however, we think there are some advantages to keeping these well concentrated, at points a mile or two apart as you go out into the farther out-parts , and maybe a half-mile apart as you get closer down into the older parts of town, rather than having them at every intersection as you suggest. I would guess that the people at San Fernando Valley may be more than adequately supplied, as a matter of fact. , Patten: I 'm not trying to be facetious , I 'm only asking you because I don 't know. Is this based on economic study of this thing or is. . . . . . Mocine: it's based on an economic study to the extent that we have made population fore- casts for the area. The colors on the map represent densities of development which, as you pointed out may be on the high side, rather than the low side, and ,if the area is developed to that extent, there will be so many people living there,which'we believe is fair to assume will have so much expendable income and therefore can do so many dollars of business. Now this is , admittedly, a rough kind of economic analysis, but for this kind of overall planning, its probably about all one can do. We didn't make a separate economic analysis for each individual shopping center, because that's way beyond the limits of this kind of planning, but we do say, we think we can demonstrate, total amount of land shown on the map in commercial use is more than adequate, almost twice what would be required to meet the needs of a certain dollar volume of business and a reasonable -14- return per square foot of business. We say twice as much, because we think there ought to be reserve, some room for the market to operate, there shouldn 't be any monopoly created, and we are perfectly willing to be shown that there needs to be more; but we think that to show this, there ought to be some concern with the balance that we tried to show. Patten: I 'm not familiar with the colors on this map and probably may be remiss about a point or two. Have you provided any areas for multiple units in the eastern part of the section, say from Hilltop east? Mocine: Yes. Let me say first that in this yellow ochre color, the density is such that it would normally be achieved by a combination of single-family residence with limited numbers of quite low-density apartments , that is , duplexes and four-plexes and the usual situation. In addition to that, we have showg' well , I can point out a few of them right here, and here, and here, and this is the one that the Bonita people haven 't been very happy with which we can understand their feelings , but there is reason for our recommendation and as .you pointed out yourself, this whole area for an even more intensive use. would say that it is our understanding that selected locations which the zoning ordinance will have to identify, the General Plan shouldnit try to, within this whole area , it would be places for proper multiple development. Patten: What is your prediction for the extension of "H" Street? Do you advocate that it continues east or, the reason I ask this is that some two years ago, we moved that beyond a doubt, it was not economically feasible to extend"H" Street. Mocine: Well , "H" Street, and we should talk about this since you raised the question, "H" Street is one of the controversial recommendations in this Plan along with this development here and a few others which have already been identified here tonight. We believe that there are some very good reasons why "H" Street is the most desirable key traffic street through the center of the City, and we think that after some careful exploration of topography and street building techniques , that it is perfectly possible to build this street. Admittedly, it is more expensive than "J" Street, but it serves the community we think, in a demonstratively better way than "J" Street does, and therefore, our recommendation, as your Consultants , is that the Plan provide for the future extension and development of "H" Street. We said, right at the very beginning, , if the community after due consideration feels that for all sorts of reasons including costs - but this shouldn 't be allowed to be the controlling reason of our estimation- they would rather have "J" Street, this can be done and the Plan will not. either rise or fall by this; we don 't think it will be quite as good, so that's our proposal to you. We think because of the Chula Vista Shopping Center here, because of the relationship to the old and historic part of Chula Vista here, because of its direct connection to the whole complex at this location, because of its connection to the freeway and waterfront, there are all sorts of reasons why there are advantages to "H" as the best location. Patten: If this is adopted, and we assume it will be, will it be a cut and dried Plan or purely a guide? Stevenson: Your last one. It 's a guide for the future development of the City, and as Mr. Mocine has said, there will have to be certain zoning things accomplished in order to carry this out as time goes on. This, basically, is a guide for the future -15- development of the City, it is not anything that we are bound to by hard and fast rules. Patten: It can be changed? Stevenson: Right. Bruce Warren: May I make just a comment on this neighborhood shopping center on which Mr. Patten was talking about. Mr. Mocine has already mentioned this - that we deter- mined this is a guide. Each man perhaps setting down and preparing this Plan may come up with a different projected population. Based on the projected population that these people have come up with, the number of neighborhood shopping centers as shown are sufficient to serve the needs of this population; however, I think that, in any event, whether or not there are five neighborhood shopping centers shown in the region of the college, if the need can be shown for more, then probably more will be provided for. Patten: I agree with this whole-heartedly, based on population projection; however, question the locale of some of these. Now I discussed this, I don't mind telling you that, the corner of Hilltop and "J" has schools on two corners , across the street there are -houses in the $12,000 and $13 ,000 class. South and west side of the corner is really some mixed up houses , in fact, we can say that there are some stuff there that shouldn't be there. This is a very high, a very busy corner as far as traffic count is concerned. In my opinion, it is not unreasonable to say that it should be redeveloped before very long as single-family residences , and I think that this particular locality should be given further consideration. Stevenson: Well , as you know Jim, this subject came up once before. Actually, it was a rezoning case and at that time, it was considered that what they intended to put in there was not compatible with the existence of schools. Now this is not to say that something won 't happen in the future, as I 'm sure you 're aware of. Patten: I 'm merely pointing out that they maintain on this plan that it should remain as R-1 . Mocine: I 've tried to make this clear, Mr. Patten. This color, this yellow color, doesn 't say R-1 , isn 't supposed to be R-1 , doesn't necessarily recommend R-l . This says medium density and this is a combination of different kinds of uses that might very well be at that corner - some kind of multiple. Warren: We have a similar situation just east of the City in another subdivision. They referred to the Sketch Plan indicating that this land can be developed at such and such a specific density that was mentioned on the map; however, in some cases, depending upon the circumstances involved, this may average out to this specific density, but in certain areas , lot sizes may vary resulting in open areas related to it. Patten: 0. K. Stevenson: Thank you very much. Manuel Kugler, Judge of the Municipal Court, Chula Vista: This comment is simply to be implied as a pat on the back for the City. I do want to say that as a former City Attorney of Chula Vista, and as a member of one of the citizen's planning com- mittees , the Community Facilities Committee, and as a citizen interested in the future development of this entire area, I want to say that your Board, the Planning Commission, Mr. Mocine and the Staff, City Council , the Administration, and all of the citizens -16- who have joined together on these various citizen 's committees , deserve I feel a pat on the back for having developed this Plan ultimately, having ultimately reached this point where you can look forward to 1990 with some comprehension and some understanding. I think that this Plan is obviously nothing more than a General Plan, not a specific Plan, and I think it is well for the City, and I want to commend you. (Audience clapped) . Stevenson: I want to say don 't stop now, we're not used to this! H. Mander: I believe I 'm one of the owners of that park that I see, for the first time, that is going to be proposed. Now my land lies west of Hilltop Junior High School , approximately 400 feet south of Hilltop and "J". My question is this: If this plan is adopted, does it freeze that land so that the owners cannot do anything with this, except to know that inevitably the City will pick it up? Is this what's going to happen? Stevenson: Well , as I understand your question right, the land that you now own is zoned and it will stay zoned that way until it is changed, and certainly, anytime that it is changed, you, above all people will know about it. I 'm fairly confident that this certainly won 't have any effect on your land other than the guide indica- tion here is that the area that you live in will be of what, medium density? Mocine: His problem, Mr. Chairman, is that he happens to own all or part of this area which is indicated for a park, a badly needed park, I might say. In answer to your specific question, Sir, the Plan doesn 't put any restrictions on your property, until the City is ready and willing to pay for it; in the meantime, you have a perfect right to use it for whatever you are using it for right now. Mander: Well , I was thinking of putting some homes out there, but if this is what 's going to happen, well , I might as well start dreaming of something else, so if, at this time, or if the City is bound to pick the land up, , I ' ll just perish the thought. have no objections to the Park; matter of fact, I think I was one of the first that suggested such a thing, because I love. to see parks when they are adjacent to schools. I ' ll probably lose a lot of money on this thing, but I would like to get the feeling of the Council and the Planning Commission just how they feel about this - that this will be a Central Park. If you are, well , I ' ll think about some- thing else. Stevenson: Very good. Thank -you. Is there anything further this evening? Ronald M. Komendera: Gentlemen, I would .like to tell you that I am verymuch in favor of this Plan. One thing I am most happy 'to see developing is something which myself and members of the Boating Club are happy to see, which we were verymuch concerned with is the recreational area that you people have planned for the foot of "J" Street. Also, I 'm very happy to see that according to the Map here, that there is a la.r.ge number of recreational parks planned for which I feel we have a definite need. Stevenson: Anyone else who would care to speak? If not, I think we are ready for the motion. Member Adams: I was wondering if it wouldn 't be a good idea to have a short recess to let the people here circulate around this Map and then, if we called the meeting to order again, we might possibly have some more comments. Stevenson: Well , I think in view of the fact that these people have come down , perhaps -17- April 1 might not be so convenient for them. I think Ed 's idea is very good. Suppose we take five or ten minutes and those of you who care to stay, look at it closer. We' ll reconvene in about five minutes. Warren: The map will be available in the Planning Office during the week. Recess. Stevenson: Now, does anyone wish to make any comments? If not, I think we are all set for a motion to adjourn the meeting until April 1st. Do I hear a motion? Member Guyer: I make that motion, Mr. Chairman. Stevenson: Fine, do I hear a second? Member Comstock: I second the motion. Stevenson: All in favor signify by saying, "Aye". Motion carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 9: 15 P.M. -18-