HomeMy WebLinkAbout2003-09-24 HAC MINS CITY OF CHULA VISTA
MINUTES
HOUSING ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING
Wednesday, September 24, 2003 Legislative-Building
3:30 p.m. Housing Conference Room
i
CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL--* 3:35 p.m.
PRESENT: Members: Frederick DuFresne, Barbara Worth, Joanne D. Clayton, John.
Wines, Gregory Alabado
ABSENT:! Kecia Washington (excused), Gustavo Bidart (unexcused)
STAFF: Mary Ladiana, Planning & Housing Manager
Diem Do, Community Development Specialist
Palmira Montiel, Senior Secretary
1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES —August 27, 2003
Joanne D. Clayton made a motion to approve the minutes as written,
Barbara Worth seconded the motion.
'-' 2. PURPOSE, FUNCTIONS & DUTIES OF THE HOUSING ADVISORY
COMMISSION - Due to two of the new commission members not being present,
it was agreed upon by commission members that this would be discussed at the
next meeting.
3. SENIORS ON BROADWAY (MAAC Project)
Diem Do gave an update on the current status of the project and resolution of
issues as raised by the City Council at the June 10, 2003 hearing.. This item will
bei presented again to Council on October 14. The Traffic Engineering
Department has worked very closely with the school district to develop a new
circulation pattern for the traffic, which was implemented on September 19. As
part of that plan, the gate at Sierra Way was closed in August, which helped to
alleviate the more serious traffic concerns, particularly because it wasn't
originally anticipated as a drop off and pick up site. The new traffic plan will
divert all traffic to K Street and off the access road from. Broadway.
Approximately 40% of the cars will utilize the access road and circulate through a
portion of the playground and then back out. The remaining traffic will use the
existing drop off and pick up location off of K Street. In relation to traffic, staff
also requested that the developer consider an alternative parking design with an
entrance and exit from Broadway. This redesign may be presented to Council on
October 14tH
The other issue that surfaced at the previous Council hearing was in regards to
the balconies. It was perceived that the balconies would encroach upon the
public right of way. In fact, the balconies are located within the proposed 6-foot
i
� 1
setback, and given the size of the balconies at 4 feet there will be 2 feet between
the balcony overhang and the sidewalk.
We, are prepared at this point to move forward and will be holding another
community meeting, which is scheduled October 1St from 6:00 to 7:30 p.m. in
Conference Rooms 2 and 3. .All commission-members are encouraged to attend
and listen to resident's concerns.
4. AFFORDABLE FOR SALE POLICY — A presentation was given by Diem Do
regarding the development of an Affordable. for Sale. Housing Policy. In
summary, .three alternatives were given to the Affordable 'Housing Working
Group at the second meeting of August 27t", which were as follows:
Option 1 -Market Rate Price using Silent Second Loan and Equity Share
Option 2 —Recapture Restriction
Option 3 —Resale Restriction
The Working Group reviewed each of the three alternatives and after much
discussion recommended Options 1 and 2 with some modifications along with
the; establishment of. underwriting criteria and a prioritization system for the
selection of buyers.
All ;Commission members agreed with the recommendations of the Working
Group.
Joanne Clayton made a motion to support the findings and. the
recommendation of the Working Group and to forward to City Council.
John Wines seconded the motion.
4. STAFF REPORTS — Programs/Projects Update
Christmas in October
This year 5 households are being .assisted through the Christmas in October
Program. There were many applications'received by mobilehome owners, but
due to the potential with conflicts due to the location of mobilehomes on
commercial property, the Board determined that it would be best to define how
mobilehomes may be best assisted in the future. All of the mobilehome
applications received were transferred to the CHIP program and. have all
received letters to assist them with.the process.
The five houses selected are located within very visible areas of the City and
.have a great need for cosmetic repairs. There is going to be a shift in next year's
program. In the future, Christmas in October may be utilized to repair homes in a
targeted revitalization program area such as the Castle Park neighborhood.
Castle Park Neighborhood Revitalization Program (NRP)
This concept came out off-a request for us to use apply for CDBF Section 108
funds for street improvements within the City. Community Development staff
requested that we concentrate some of the City's financial resources in a specific
neighborhood. The neighborhood selected was Castle Park, which is bounded
by Naples on the north, Palomar on the south, Third Avenue on the west and
Tobias on the east. It is approximately 26 blocks. $6.5 million of the City funds
are being put set aside for the neighborhood to accomplish the following:
2
j
1) Implement infrastructure, streets, curb, sidewalks and gutters
2) Rehabilitate properties for low and moderate income homeowners
3) Community renovation � and improvement such as tree planting,
development of public art, and coordination of resources for clean up
events, etc.
The idea is to work very closely with the residents .and help them to develop a
resident action plan so that we can work from that with the City as the major
funding source and supporter. It is the hope that this program may be expanded
by.adding other programs such as working with youthwithin that neighborhood,
who may be the graffiti artists, and provide employment opportunities for
beautifying the neighborhood. .There is also a possibility of partnering with
groups like Urban Corp, Job Corp. to give them some job skills where they would
also be paid a salary.
Fred Dufresne asked if the Christmas in October homes have to be owner-
occupied or if they can be rentals. Diem Do responded that the Christmas -in
October does not include rental homes, only owner occupied units.
i
Commission members suggested a five-year anniversary be celebrated and that.
volunteers re-visit the residents to see if the properties are being maintained.
5. MEMBERS COMMENTS
I
Member Clayton asked about condo conversions within the City and specifically
wondered if all of the conversions were being done privately or if the City was
involved:
Diem Do stated the City has had discussions regarding this for over a year and
are trying to rework the condoconversion ordinance, but the ordinance doesn't
currently allow us to require affordability upon conversion. Staff is working with
the Attorney's office and Planning & Building to modify the ordinance. There is
only one condo conversion that.has applied for a concession from the City in the
form of a density bonus and therefore has to comply with the requirement for the
provision of affordable housing. --
Frederick Dufresne mentioned that the holidays were upon us and in the past
meetings have been scheduled a week before the holiday or cancelled. He
asked the members to consider the options and.decide what action to take at the
next meeting.
.6. ADJOURNMENT
To 11Tnext general meeting ofOctober22, 2003.
Recorder, Palmira Montiel
JAcommdev\housing advisory commission\m1nutes\9-24-03.min
I
i
i
3
i