HomeMy WebLinkAbout2018/02/27 Item 11 - Written Communication - Acerro Sheree Kansas
Subject: FW: Things that need to be in cannabis regulations
From: THERESA ACERRO
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2018 4:17 PM
To: Mary Salas; Patricia Aguilar; John McCann; Mike Diaz; Steve C. Padilla
Subject: Things that need to be in cannabis regulations
It is good you are waiting to vote on
what has been proposed, but there are
more inadequacies that are important
to those of us who live here. It is
disgraceful that the existing document
has been written to cater to the
industry instead of to protect the
residents. Making it more pleasing to
the industry is not the correct direction .
You need to make it more pleasing to
the residents who have to live with the
consequences.
Comments from last night on plan and a few more. First off I really
don't understand why you are trying to reinvent the wheel when
San Diego has regulations that have been working fairly well for
several years.
1. The city is in financial difficulty again, and three of you have
been in office before when finances were bad. Three of you are
responsible for the situation. Every time you voted since our
General Plan update to change commercial or industrial zoning to
residential you made our financial situation worse. You all know
that your salaries are outrageous. We need a charter amendment to
change their determination from a portion of a superior court
judge's salary. It is ridiculous and wasteful that the mayor makes
more than the mayor of San Diego and part-time council people
make $70,000 per year PLUS PENSION AND BENIFITS. This is the
first place that cuts need to be made. You need to stop looking at
cannabis as a way to make money for the city. All the money from a
tax on sales will need to go toward regulating the industry and
treatment programs for addicts and prevention programs for minors
and dealing with increase in homelessness and more enforcement
for driving under the influence and other crimes. You found out all
these problems in city you visited. This money has to go to dealing
with the problems.
2. It is unacceptable that MEDICAL MARIJUANA HAS BEEN LEFT
OUT OF THIS DISCUSSION. I KNOW PEOPLE WHO RELY UPON THIS
FOR PERCEIVED BENEFIT FROM VARIOUS MEDICAL PROBLEMS.
Retired nurses remember when doctors actually prescribed it and
had it in their offices. In order to distinguish medical marijuana
(which can not be taxed from recreational which should be taxed,
you must require the medical to have a lower THC (probably 14
since I am told the plants that were only 4 in the 60's have been
bred to be 14 now)). They can manufacture this stuff up to 90%
THC, which should be a schedule one drug, and it would be a good
idea to prohibit that. This way people who want it for medical
reasons and have a card can get what they think they need. All the
stores should be required to have some on hand and available for
delivery. Other people who want to get high need to buy the other
stuff and pay the taxes.
3. Criminal prosecution of the illegal stores must be started ASAP.
They will be cheaper and unfair competition. All fines, etc. must go
to enforcement.
4. No CUPS for store fronts in industrial zones. This is a good place
for them. The weird way of determining distance has to include
banning them when they share a property line with residential or
are across an alley or street), since this bizarre way of measuring
would allow them to be back to back with residential properties
along Third and north side of Main, which is totally unacceptable.
How would you like lights shining into your bedroom window all
hours of the night and your kids not being allowed to play in their
backyard because of odor and sight of people smoking or using
drugs?
S. Storefronts are logical locations for delivery services. They have
to be out of a cannabis related business or they will be out of
2
people's homes which is very dangerous considering the huge sums
of cash involved. Adequate security is critical. Three armed
robberies have occurred that I know of at illegal shops near
people's homes. There is good reason to keep vendors far away
from any and all places where children and residents live or spend
time.
6. There needs to be a restriction on the numbers of cultivation,
manufacturing and testing sites in each council District so they are
not all clustered in one. Voice of San Diego already has CV labelled
httt3s://www.voiceofsandiego.org/topics/government/reluctantly-
chula-vista-going-pot/because of this . We don't need that
reputation. We are supposed to be a family friendly place.
7. Relying on out of town delivery services is no longer viable if you
expect to collect taxes. They need to be from store fronts or
manufacturers or distributors licensed in this city not somewhere
else.
8. Sites like 3149 Main, which is only one I know of, that are not
causing any problems now need to be allowed to become legal.
9. It is crucial that everything sold in this city be tested to be
pesticide and any other poison free. Also the THC level needs to be
known and lower than 90%.
10. There has to be favoritism to allowing local CV residents to open
these businesses. Some of your restrictions should only apply to
outsiders.
3
Sheree Kansas
Subject: FW: cancelled meeting
From: THERESA ACERRO
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2018 7:05 PM
To: Mary Salas; Patricia Aguilar; John McCann; Mike Diaz; Steve C. Padilla
Subject: cancelled meeting
I hope the council meeting has been cancelled because
serious changes are being made to what was proposed to
regulate marijuana businesses.
No one else is doing it but it is really important to regulate
THC levels. they always test for that. 90% should be a
schedule 1 drug and should not be allowed in our city. the
seniors with aches and pains who remember the pot of the
60's should be able to get medical marijuana with low THC.
They unfortunately have now have bred the plants to have
between 14 and 34% THC. They naturally only had 4% in
the 60's and in Mexico, which is why more marijuana is
now going from the USA to Mexico than the other way.
There is a huge glut of marijuana in all the states that
have legalized it which puts pressure to allow more stores
and also to get more people addicted just like the nicotine
in cigarettes that the cigarette industry was so successful
with . You can't allow unlimited cultivation and
manufacturing without encouraging the addiction of kids to
expand the market.
Measurement has to be property line to property line if you
really want to protect residents and children from harmful
effects which include danger from armed robberies
1
nextdoor. People have the right to enjoy their backyards
when their property backs up to commercial businesses
Number one the city is incapable of regulating and
monitoring unlimited marijuana or even 12 stores.
We don't have the police or the code enforcement
officers to do anything else. One code enforcement
officer for the entire west dise is a joke. Taking over
a year to close an illegal business is ridiculous. We
need criminal prosecution.
YOU ALL KNOW THAT BASING YOUR
PAY UPON A SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE 'S
SALARY IS RIDICULOUS AND YOU
SHOULD BE ASHAMED TO BE MAKING
SO MUCH MORE THAN THE STAFF OF .
THE CITY THAT ACTUALLY DOES WORK
AND PUT IN 40 HOURS OF WORK PER
WEEK. THE CHARTER NEEDS TO BE
REVISED. YOU ARE WHY WE DONT
HAVE THE MONEY TO HIRE SEVERAL
MORE POLICE OFFICERS--IT IS GOING
INTO YOUR INFLATED SALARIES AND
BENEFITSHH
z