HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Comm Reports/2000/05/24
AGENDA
CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
Chula Vista, California
6:00 p.m.
Wednesday, May 24, 2000
Council Chambers
Public Services Building
276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALUMOTlONS TO EXCUSE
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
INTRODUCTORY REMARKS
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Opportunity for members of the public to speak to the Planning Commission on any
subject matter within the Commission's jurisdiction but not an item on today's agenda.
Each speaker's presentation may not exceed three minutes,
1. PUBLIC HEARING: SUPS-00-05: Adoption ofa resolution recommending thatthe City of
Chula Vista Redevelopment Agency approve the construction of an
automobile service station with associated mini-mart and car wash
located at 3733 Main Street in the Southwest Redevelopment Area
and the Limited I ndustrial (I L) Zone.
Staff: Steve Power, Associate Planner
2. PUBLIC HEARING: PCC-00-33; Conditional Use Permit to allow for a 40-foot high
"Monopalm" at 740 Hilltop Drive (Hilltop Baptist Church).
Staff: Harold Phelps, Associate Planner
The Planning Commission Chair will open the public hearing, take
public testimony, and continue this item to the Planning Commission
meeting of June 7, 2000 at 6:00 p.m.
DIRECTOR'S REPORT
Review upcoming meeting calendar.
COMMISSIONER COMMENTS:
ADJOURNMENT:
to a Planning Commission meeting on June 7, 2000.
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA STATEMENT
Item No.: 1
Meeting Date: 5/24/00
ITEM TITLE:
Public Hearing: SUPS-00-05: Adoption of a resolution recommending that the City of
Chula Vista Redevelopment Agency approve the construction of an
automobile service station with associated mini-mart and car wash
located at 3733 Main Street in the Southwest Redevelopment Area and
the Limited Industrial (IL) Zone.
The project applicant is proposing to construct a gas station with associated food mart,
fast food restaurant, and car wash. Gasoline filling areas would be covered by canopy
structures. The project site is located within the Montgomery Specific Plan Area. The
project site consists of a 67,700 square-foot vacant parcel that is bordered by
commercial/industrial development. The project plans call for the construction of
sidewalk, curb, and gutter along both the Mace Street and Main Street frontages. The
project landscape plan calls for the construction of planter areas along both Mace and
Main Streets. Street trees would be planted along both street frontages.
The project is subject to environmental review. A draft Mitigated Negative Declaration
(IS-00-14) has been prepared which addresses potential environmental impacts associated
with the project.
RECOMMENDATION:
I) That the Planning Commission approve the attached resolution recommending
that the Redevelopment Agency approve the project as submitted to the
Planning Commission, and approve the Mitigated Negative Declaration as it
will be amended to include the results of a Phase 2 environmental study.
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATIONS:
The Resource Conservation Commission (RCC) reviewed the draft Mitigated Negative
Declaration for the project (IS-00-14) at its meeting of April 17, 2000. At that meeting,
RCC members raised concerns that the draft MND did not adequately address mitigation
measures for potential hazardous waste on site, because Phase 2 soils testing had not yet
been performed. RCC members stated that Phase 2 soils testing needs to be performed
prior to consideration of the MND by the Redevelopment Agency. RCC members stated
that the language of the MND would need to be modified to address the conclusions of
the Phase 2 hazardous waste assessment once that study is completed. The Phase I study
performed for the project identified the potential for hazardous substances on site. The
Pal;'; 2, Item No.: 1
Meeting Date: 5/24/00
Phase I study, therefore, recommended that a Phase 2 study be performed in order to
determine the level of the potential impact and mitigation for any impact determined to
be significant regarding potential soil toxicity. The RCC also stated that the draft MND
should be modified to state that there would not be any adverse noise impacts associated
with the car wash proposed for the eastern portion of the site.
The Design Review Committee reviewed the proposed project at its meeting of May 1,
2000. At that meeting, Committee members stated that the project was well designed and
would be an asset to the area in which it will be located. The DRC recommended
approval of the project to the Redevelopment Agency. DRC members raised objections,
however, Tegarding a proposed pylon (pole) sign called out on the project plans for the
northwest comer of the development site. Committee members stated that the City
Design Guidelines specifically discourage pole signs and that a monument-type sign
should be used in place of a pole sign. The DRC recommended that the Redevelopment
Agency not approve the proposed pole sign that has been included with the project plans
(please refer to Attachment "A").
DISCUSSION:
The project site is located at 3733 Main Street in the Limited Industrial (IL) Zone within
the Montgomery Specific Plan area. The project site consists of a 67,700 square-foot
vacant parcel. Surrounding uses consist of commercial development to the west, east and
north of the site, and a residential structure located to the immediate south of the parcel.
The existing residential structure located to the south of the project site is on a parcel that
is also zoned Limited Industrial.
The development site is situated in the Otay Town section of the Montgomery Specific
Plan Area. The Montgomery area is described as a "low profile, medium density,
suburban community which is substantially developed. It is characterized by its mixed
land use pattern, strip commercial, incomplete infrastructure, scarcity of park sites, and
general unkempt appearance." The Otay Town area is characterized by its pattern of
mixed commercial, industrial, and residential land uses. The Montgomery Specific Plan
acknowledges the need for the revitilization of the Montgomery area and sets forth
specific proposals to achieve that end.
According to the Zoning Code, the purpose of the Limited Industrial Zone is "to
encourage sound limited industrial development by providing and protecting an
environment free from nuisances created by some industrial uses and to insure the purity
of the total environment of Chula Vista and San Diego County and to protect nearby
residential, commercial and industrial uses from any hazards or nuisances."
Pab- 3, Item No.: 1
Meeting Date: 5/24/00
ANALYSIS:
Project Description:
The applicant is proposing to construct a new gas station, with an associated food
mart/restaurant, and car wash. The proposed gas station portion of the project would
consist of two separate filling areas, each covered by a canopy. The main service area
would be located toward the north of the site and would consist of eight pump islands. A
second dispensing area (dispensing diesel fuel) would be situated toward the west of the
site and would consist of three pump islands (six pumps). Both pump areas would be
covered by a canopy that would measure approximately 25 feet in height.
A 5,433 square-foot commercial building would be constructed at the south of the site.
This structure would consist of a food mart and drive through fast food restaurant. The
maximum height of this building would be 32 feet above grade. A drive-through lane
would be situated along the southern property line of the site, and would be accessed via
Mace Street. A menu/speaker board would be situated at the southwest of the site. The
project site plan depicts a block wall ranging in height from 6 feet to 9 feet, to be placed
along the southern property line. The subject wall would help to screen the residence on
the adjoining southerly parcel from the proposed driveway and speaker board.
The project site plan has been designed to complement the surrounding commercial area.
As designed, the project should not have any detrimental impact upon neighboring
commercial uses. It is important to note that the proposed drive-through would be
situated adjacent to an existing single-family residence. The applicants have depicted a 9
foot-high block wall along the southern property line of the site in order to mitigate noise
impacts associated with this operation. The Planning Division has not received any
objections from the neighboring (southerly) property owner regarding this project. It is
important to note that a commercial operation is maintained on the same property as that
of the neighboring single-family residence. The proposed project appears to be
compatible with the commercial aspect of the adjoining southerly parcel. A noise study
completed as a part of the environmental review of the project determined that there
would not be any adverse noise impacts associated with the operation of this facility.
Letters of concern regarding general security issues and traffic circulation associated with
the proposed gas station have been received by the Planning Division (Attachment "C").
Staff has incorporated the requirements of the Chula Vista Engineering Department, as
well as the Police Department's Crime Prevention Unit as conditions of approval for this
project (as with all DRC projects) in order to address traffic and security issues.
It is important to note that the proposed food mart would sell alcohol for off-site
consumption. Staff has included conditions of approval recommended by the Police
Department that address the sale of alcohol by the food mart.
Pab- 4, Item No.: 1
Meeting Date: 5/24/00
The plans also call for the construction of a car wash to be located at the east of the site.
The car wash would measure 1,248 square-feet in area and would maintain a height of
sixteen feet above grade. The car wash would be accessed off of Main Street. The
proposed car wash would be situated immediately adjacent to the existing self-storage
facility located on the adjoining parcel to the east of the development site.
The gas station and food service portion of the project would operate on a 24 hour basis.
The car wash would be open between the hours of 7 a.m. and 7 p.m.
Site Plan and Parkin~:
Vehicular access to the site would be taken from both Mace and Main Streets. Two
driveways would be constructed along each of these streets. A total of 32 parking spaces
would be provided on the site. Staff has detennined that the project meets City off-street
parking requirements. The parking lot layout has been detennined by staff to be in
confonnance with City parking lot standards with regard to such issues as minimum
driving lane widths and stall sizes.
Other notable features of the site plan include the placement of a trash enclosure at the
southeastern corner of the property, an air and water reel at the northwest of the site, and
decorative paving along the driveway entrances to the site. The plans also call for the
construction of curb, gutter, and sidewalk along both Mace and Main Streets.
Landscapin~: A landscape plan has been prepared for the site. The proposed landscape
plan calls for the placement of fifteen-foot wide planter areas along Main Street and ten
foot wide planters along Mace Street, Street trees would be placed along both street
frontages. A three-foot-wide planter area would be maintained along the southern
property I ine. Staff has included a condition of approval calling for the planting of vines
on the wall proposed along the southern property line. The proposed trash enclosure
called out at the southeast of the site would be surrounded by a planter area that would
range in width from approximately 3 feet to 20 feet. The City Landscape Planner has
reviewed the proposed landscaping plan and found it to meet City landscaping
requirements.
Zonin~:
The following table demonstrates the project's confonnance with the development
standards of the Limited Industrial Zone.
STANDARDS REQUIRED PROPOSED
Front yard setback 20 feet 42 feet
Side yard setback o feet 3 feet
Rear yard setback o feet 15 feet
Floor Area Ratio N/A N/A
Lot coverage 50% Maximum 12.5%
Height 45 feet 32 feet
Parking 30 spaces 32 spaces
Pab- 5, Item No.: 1
Meeting Date: 5/24/00
Sij!naj!e
The project plans call for the placement of a pylon (pole) sign at the northwest comer of
the site. The proposed sign would measure 30 feet in height by 9 feet in width. The pylon
sign would be double sided with a total sign area (both sides) of approximately 150
square-feet. The gasoline portion of the proposed pylon sign would read "Mobile Oil"
and would maintain the company's blue and white corporate colors. The proposed sign
would be internally illuminated and would consist of translucent vinyl background
materials and lettering. As stated previously, the DRC raised concerns regarding the use
of the pylon and asked that the Redevelopment Agency not approve this sign. Staff would
concur that the pylon sign is not an appropriate use of signage for the site. All other
proposed signage was found to be acceptable by the DRC.
Architecture:
Materials for the proposed commercial structure would consist of earth tone colored
stucco. Accent materials would consist of plaster columns with tile insets. The roof of the
proposed building would consist of red colored barrel tiles, Both of the proposed gas area
canopies, as well as the car wash building, would incorporate materials consistent with
the store/fast food building. Proposed colors and materials appear to be compatible with
structures in the area surrounding the project site.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
A Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project and can be reviewed
in Attachment "B." Because the project site is within a redevelopment area, the City
Redevelopment Agency would be approving the Mitigated Negative Declaration in their
Teview of the overall project. As noted above, the draft MND may be subject to
modification prior to review by the Redevelopment Agency.
CONCLUSION:
Staff is recommending approval of SUPS-DO-OS, as well as the attached MND, based
upon the findings and conditions as noted in the attached draft resolution (Attachment
"B").
Attachment "A" - DRC action minutes
Attachment "B" - Draft resolution
Attachment "C" - Letters regarding project
II: home/planning/stevexp/sup0005 .rpt
-., _.._.._.._.._---,..._..__._~._-
ACTION REPORT
DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
Chula Vista, California
May 1, 2000
4:40 p.m.
Conference Room 5
Public Services Building
ROLL CALL
Chair Patricia Aguilar P , Vice-Chair Peter Morlon P ,Members
- -
Alfredo Araiza~, Cheryl Mestler ~ and Jose Alberdi -R
INTRODUCTORY REMARKS
APPROVAL OF MINUTES: February 21, 2000
The minutes of February 21, 2000 were continued for lack of quorum
from that meeting.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: None.
ACTION ITEM
1.
DRC-99-34
North Island Federal Credit Union
860 Amena Court
Drive-through and ATM building
MSC (Alberdi/Morlon) to approve DRC-99-34 as presented.
Vote: (4-0-0-1) with Araiza absent.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
2.
DRC-00-42
Worldwide Petroleum
3733 Main Street
Consideration of approval of a new 24-hour gas station with
associated food mart and car wash to be constructed on a
vacant parcel
MSC (Aguilar/Morlon) to approve DRC-00-42 with all the
Conditions of Approval in the staff report. Add Condition
#20: That the pole sign in the proposal be replaced with
a monument sign. The monument sign would be subject to
staff approval so it would not have to come back to the
Committee. Add Condition #21: That the overhangs of the
ATTACHMENT "A"
_'_'___k_._"_' ____._______.___,_____. ..,__,___,_
Design Review Committee Action Report
May 1, 2000
Page 2
building, towers and walkway are designed in such a way
where the water does not run to the face of the stucco.
Vote: (4-0-0-1) with Araiza absent.
STAFF COMMENTS: Cancellation ofJune 19,2000 meeting
Ms. Beverly Blessent (Senior Planner) stated that June 19, 2000 is
the Ken Lee Memorial Golf Tournament. That meeting mayor may not
be rescheduled depending on the workload.
MEMBER COMMENTS
Chair Aguilar had concerns regarding pole sign regulations on the
bay front and pole signs in general. These concerns were discussed
at length.
Vice-Chair Morlan inquired about the County Building
Sandoval (Assistant Planning Director) indicated that
working with the County on that sign.
sign. Mr.
staff is
ADJOURNMENT AT 5: 35 p. m. to a regular meeting on Monday, May 15, 2000, at 4:30
p.m. in Conference Rooms 2 and 3.
(a:\llb\DRC I 999\drc050 1 OOACTIONRPT.doc)
RESOLUTION NO. SUPS-00-05
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDING THAT THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA GRANT A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SUPS-00-05, TO WORLDWIDE
PETROLEUM COMPANY, TO CONSTRUCT A GAS STATION WITH ASSOCIATED
CAR WASH, FAST FOOD RESTAURANT, AND FOOD MART.
WHEREAS, a duly verified application for a special use permit was filed with the City of Chula Vista
Planning Department on December 21, 1999 by Worldwide Petroleum Company; and
WHEREAS, said application requests permission to construct a gas station with associated car wash,
fast food restaurant, and food mart, located at 3733 Main Street; and
WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Coordinator has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration
for approval by the City Redevelopment Agency, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Director set the time and place for a hearing on said special use permit and
notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of general
circulation in the city and its mailing to property owners and residents within 500 feet of the exterior
boundaries of the property at least 10 days prior to the hearing; and,
WHEREAS, the hearing was scheduled and advertised for May 24, 2000, 6:00 p.m. in the Council
Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered all reports, evidence, and testimony presented at
the public hearing with respect to subject application.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION does hereby
recommend that the City Redevelopment Agency approve Special Use Permit SUPS-OO-05, and the
attached Mitigated Negative Declaration as it will be amended to address the results of a Phase 2 Study,
in accordance with the findings and subject to the conditions and findings contained in the attached City
Redevelopment Agency Resolution.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the City
Redevelopment Agency.
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF CHULA VISTA,
CALIFORNIA, this 24th day of May, 2000, by the following vote, to-wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
John Willett, Chair
ATTEST:
Diana Vargas, Secretary
H ,IHOMEIPLANNINGISTEVEXPISUPSOOO5. PCRES
ATTACHMENT"B"
RESOLUTION NO._
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF
THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA GRANTING A SPECIAL USE
PERMIT, SUPS-00-05, TO WORLDWIDE PETROLEUM
COMPANY, TO CONSTRUCT A GAS STATION WITH
ASSOCIATED FAST FOOD RESTAURANT, CAR WASH, AND
FOOD MART, LOCATED AT 3733 MAIN STREET.
A. RECITALS
1. Project Site
WHEREAS, the parcel which is the subject matter of this resolution is represented
in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, and for the
purpose of general description is located at 3733 Main Street, Chula Vista,
2. Project Applicant
WHEREAS, on December 21, 1999 a duly verified application for a special use
permit (SUPS-00-05) was filed with the City of Chula Vista Planning Division by
Worldwide Petroleum Company (Applicant); and,
3. Project Description; Application for Special Use Permit
WHEREAS, Applicant requests permission to construct a gas station with
associated fast food restaurant, car wash, and food mart (project); and,
4. Planning Commission Record on Application
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission scheduled and advertised a public hearing
on the Project for May 24, 2000, and
WHEREAS, at the Planning Commission meeting of May 24, 2000, the
Commission considered a motion to support staffs recommendation for approval
of the project; and,
5.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission voted
; and,
6. Redevelopment Agency Record of Application
WHEREAS, a duly called and noticed public hearing on the Project was held
before the Redevelopment Agency on _, to receive the recommendation of the
Planning Commission, and to hear public testimony with regard to same.
Resolution No.
Page #2
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Redevelopment Agency does hereby
find, determine and resolve as follows:
B. PLANNING COMMISSION RECORD
The proceedings and all evidence on the Project introduced before the Planning
Commission at their public hearing on this project held on May 24, 2000 and the minutes
and resolution resulting therefrom, are hereby incorporated into the record of this
proceeding.
C. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The Environmental Review Coordinator has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration for
approval by the Redevelopment Agency pursuant to the California Environmental Quality
Act.
D. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH CEQA
The Redevelopment Agency does hereby find that the environmental determination of the
Environmental Review Coordinator was reached in accordance with requirements of the
California Environmental Quality Act, the State EIR Guidelines, and the Environmental
Review Procedures of the City of Chula Vista.
E. SPECIAL USE PERMIT FINDINGS
The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Chula Vista does hereby make the findings
required by the Agency's rules and regulations for the issuance of special use permits, as
herein below set forth, and sets forth, thereunder, the evidentiary basis that permits the
stated finding to be made.
I. That the proposed use at the location is necessary or desirable to provide a
service or facility which will contribute to the general well being of the
neighborhood or the community.
The proposed gas station with associated fast food restaurant, car wash, and food mart is
desirable in that it will provide needed services to residents of Chula Vista in a
conveniently located and easily accessible site. The project is well designed and the
construction of public improvements associated with the project will serve to improve the
right-of-way along both Mace Street and Main Street.
2. That such use will not under the circumstances of the particular case, be
detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of persons residing or
working in the vicinity or injurious to property or improvements in the
vicinity.
Resolution No,
Page #3
The proposed gas station and associated improvements will not be detrimental to persons
or property in the vicinity of the project site. An environmental analysis was performed
for the project site in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental
Quality Act. As a result of that environmental analysis specific mitigation conditions have
been placed upon the project. Said conditions are included in the Mitigated Negative
Declaration for the project and are incorporated herein as conditions of approval for SUPS-
00-05.
3. That the proposed use will comply with the regulations and conditions specified
in the code for such use.
Special Use Permit SUPS-00-05 requires the permittee to comply with all the applicable
regulations and standards specified in the Municipal Code for such use.
The conditioning of SUPS-00-05 is approximately proportional both in nature and extent
to the impact created by the proposed development in that the conditions imposed are
directly related to and are of a nature and scope related to the size and impact of the
project.
4. That the granting of this conditional use permit will not adversely affect the
general plan of the City or the adopted plan of any government agency.
The granting of SUPS-OO-05 will not adversely affect the Chula Vista General Plan in that
said project is conformance with the City Zoning Ordinance and General Plan. The site is
in an area that is characterized by commercial and industrial uses, said uses conforming
with the General Plan.
F. TERMS OF GRANT OF PERMIT
The Redevelopment Agency hereby grants Special Use Permit SUPS-00-05 subject to the
following conditions whereby the applicant and/or property owner shall:
Planning and Building Department Conditions:
1. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the project landscape and irrigation plan shall be
reviewed and approved by the City Landscape Planner.
2. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the new structures, all landscaping
and hardscape improvements shall be installed in accordance with the approved landscape
plan.
3. The final landscape plan shall provide for a landscape treatment (vines) for the wall to be
located at the south of the site. Said plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City
Landscape Planner prior to the issuance of building permits.
,,'---~.-...'---" .-...--- ,..-.. ---
Resolution No.
Page #4
4. Construct the project as submitted, unless otherwise modified herein.
5. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall comply with all requirements
of the Building Division. Said requirements include but are not limited to:
a. Submit architectural plans that are stamped and signed by a licensed architect.
b. Structural plans and calculations must be stamped and signed by a California
Registered Civil/Structural Engineer.
c. Project shall comply with 1997 UBC and 1996 NEC.
d. Project shall comply with 1998 handicapped accessibility requirements.
e. Plans shall indicate type of occupancy,
6. A graffiti resistant treatment shall be specified for and applied to all wall and building
surfaces. This shall be noted for any building and wall plans and shall be reviewed and
approved by the Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permits. Additionally,
the project shall conform with Sections 9.20.055 and 9.20.035 of the CVMC regarding
graffiti control.
7. All mitigation measures outlined in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project (lS-
00-14) attached hereto (Exhibit "B"), shall be complied with to the satisfaction of the
Director of Planning and Building in perpetuity.
8. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall obtain a sign permit for all
proposed signage.
Public Works and Engineering Department Conditions:
9. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall dedicate two feet ofright-of-
way along Main Street.
10. A separate sewer connection shall be required for the car wash area drainage system.
11. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall install a 250 watt
street light on Main Street, and a 150 watt street light on Mace Street.
12. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit improvement plans
which specify and guarantee the completion of the following public improvements:
A) Widen Main Street to 41 feet centerline to curb for the 53 foot half of the street
right-of-way.
B) Construct curb, gutter, and 8-foot-wide sidewalk along the entire Main street
Frontage.
C) Widen Mace Street to 26 feet centerline to curb for the 36 foot of the street right-of-
way.
D) Construct curb, gutter, and 5-foot-wide sidewalk along the entire Mace Street
frontage.
Resolution No.
Page #5
E) Construct driveway approaches per Chula Vista Construction Standard No.1.
F) Construct pedestrian ramp per ADA Standards as southeast corner of the
intersection of Main Street and Mace Street.
13. Driveway approaches must meet all applicable City of Chula Vista standards and must
be 8 feet minimum from the Point of Curb Return (PCR),
14. If the total on-site excavation exceeds the amount permitted without a grading permit as
prescribed by the City of Chula Vista Grading Ordinance Number 1797 Section
15.04.150, applicant shall apply for and obtain a grading permit prior to the
commencement of grading.
15. The applicant shall address all other comments noted in the attached Engineering
Department Memorandum dated January 19,2000 and included as Exhibit "C" to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Fire Department Conditions:
16. Project plans shall be subject to the review and approval of the City of Chula Vista Fire
Department.
Police Department Conditions:
17. The applicant shall comply with all recommendations of the City of Chula Vista Crime
Prevention Unit as shown in memorandum included in Exhibit "C."
Conditions relating to the sale of alcohol:
18. No floor displays of beer or wine are allowed. All alcohol must be displayed in the
cooler area.
19. Locks shall be installed and maintained on cooler doors where alcohol will be
displayed,
20. Beer shall be sold in quantities of no less than a six pack. No singles allowed.
21. Wine shall not be sold in bottles or containers smaller than 750 milliliters, Wine-
coolers shall not be sold in units of less than a four pack.
22. Alcohol sales shall be permitted only between the hours of 8 a.m. and 11 p.m.
Other Conditions
23. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Sweetwater Authority as described
in Exhibit "C,"
---. .. --.--------------...-..--..--
Resolution No.
Page #6
24. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall pay all required school fees.
25. This conditional use permit shall become void and ineffective if not utilized or extended
within one year from the effective date thereof, in accordance with Section 19.14.260 of
the Municipal Code.
26. Applicant/operator shall and does hereby agree to indemnify, protect, defend and hold
harmless City, its Council members, officers, employees, agents and representatives, from
and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands, claims and costs, including
court costs and attorney's fees (collectively, liabilities) incurred by the City arising,
directly or indirectly, from (a) City's approval and issuance of this Special Use Permit, (b)
City's approval or issuance of any other permit or action, whether discretionary or non-
discretionary, in connection with the use contemplated herein, and c) Applicant's
installation and operation of the facility permitted hereby. Applicant/operator shall
acknowledge their agreement to this provision by executing a copy of this Special Use
Permit where indicated, below. Applicant's/operator's compliance with this provision is
an express condition of this Special Use Permit and this provision shall be binding on any
and all of Applicant's/operator's successors and assigns.
G. EXECUTION AND RECORDATION OF RESOLUTION OF APPROVAL
The property owner and the applicant shall execute this document by signing the lines provided
below, said execution indicating that the property owner and applicant have each read, understood
and agreed to the conditions contained herein. Upon execution, this document shall be recorded
with the County Clerk of the County of San Diego, at the sole expense of the property owner
and/or applicant, and a signed, stamped copy returned to the Planning Department. Failure to
return a signed and stamped copy of this recorded document within ten days of recordation to the
City Clerk shall indicate the property owner/applicant's desire that the project, and the
corresponding application for building permits and/or a business license, be held in abeyance
without approval. Said document will also be on file in the City Clerk's Office and known as
Document No.
Signature of Representative of
Worldwide Petroleum Company
Date
H. INVALIDITY; AUTOMATIC REVOCATION
It is the intention of the City Council that its adoption of this Resolution is dependent upon
the enforceability of each and every term, provision and condition herein stated; and that
in the event that anyone or more terms, provisions or conditions are determined by a
Court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, this resolution and
Resolution No.
Page #7
the permit shall be deemed to be automatically revoked and of no further force and effect
ab initio.
Presented by
Robert A. Leiter
Director of Planning and Building
H: IHOMEIPLANNINGlSTEVEXPISUPS0005. CCRES
Exhibit" A" - Locator map
Exhibit "B" - Mitigated Negative Declaration
Exhibit "C" - Department Comments
Approved as to form by
John M. Kaheny
City Attorney
.._.,--_...,.._.._._----...._--_._--~~~._~--_.~_.__.....--
/
-----
: ..----
,.
/'/
~/. / -
.L--- _
--- -
i ,
-
I I
, '
i Iii 1
III i i.
R~
r--" n I :
r--" H I ~
~ ~ "Ie
L-! I,;
...J
jj --I I j ~ ;
I"" .
WJN STET
j i i I! I' I'
: I i
! BRlTiall S11Ei
J
i,":-";'/
I vJj i
',0 I
'""TTI\\ : i: I ;
l i i \/"~ II I j
: I
, ,
-----
i I
f-!
iN i Ililli~-Wc
~'I l~illW~
'I' " '1IIir--:~
,:,~n __il~1 H-1!
I. ,!if; I!. ": ii!j
ITID H r I , "E:3: '.
'I " i .
I " ' I
I I Ii
J ,J
, I
-! i
, .
,
- ,
:--.....
, ,
'""
itt!
g
W
~
::i:
Ii
I'
1\
!
.,
j-
-!
.-
~
\ "'\
\\
~)
,
,. , I
PROJECTi lQCA110N
, I , , I
'i: j
: i : I
I ,
I
"
I!
;t:~-
i: iiill
!iiH~
.c-. 'I'
;i~'
:==---1-r
il . :1
'i
; ,i I:
r--; i : [
~I'" 'If
, rn-l,
liiH,.' "U'
I I: Iii I
:: ., i
II I
Iii
:! I
Ii...-.....-J '
. i'
! i
! !
, ,
Ii
, ,
, ,
II
, ,
.. ..:.
C HULA VISTA PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT
LOCATOR ~~~ All AMANI, President of WPC PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
C) SPECIAL USE PERMIT
PROJECT 3733 Main Street
ADDRESS: Request Proposed 3,352 square foot 24 hour, food mart and
a detached 1.248 foot self-serve car wash.
SCALE: FI'-E NUM8=R:
NORTH No Scale SUPS - 00-05
h :lhomelplanninglhectorllocatorslsups0005.cdr 01/11/00
FXHIRTT"A"
Mitigated NegCitive Declaratio _-
PROJECT NAME:
Chula Vista Food Mart & Car Wash
PROJECT LOCATION:
SEC of Main & Mace Streets, City ofChula Vista
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.:
629-130-30
PROJECT APPLICANT:
Ali Amani, Worldwide Petroleum Co.
CASE NO.:
IS-00-14
DATE: April 7, 2000
A. Proiect Setting
The project site consists of a vacant near-level graded 1.57 acre site located on the south east
corner of Main Street and Mace Street in the City's Southwest Redevelopment Area.
Surrounding uses are as follows: North: (across Main Street) Light Industrial - V-Haul
Storage; East: Light Industrial- Self Storage facility; South: Light Industrial- single family
residence/auto storage; West: (across Main Street) Light Industrial - muffler & raditator
repair shop.
The project site has been cleared of all vegetation and therefore does not represent viable
habitat for any sensitive animal species.
Main Street is designated as a four-lane major arterial, by the City's Circulation Element.
Mace Street is a local street.
B. Proiect Descrivtion
The proposed project consists of a proposed fueling station with '16 fueling stations (pumps)
for passenger vehicles, two fueling stations for commercial trucks, convenience food mart,
dcrive-thru restaurant and an express car wash. The total building area is 6,529 square feet.
The service station and food mart are proposed to operate 24 hours and the car wash will be
open between the hours of7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m.
The applicant is proposing to install two driveways on Main Street and two driveways on
Mace Street to serve the proposed development. The project will provide a total of 22
parking spaces on-site in accordance with the City's Zoning Ordinance parking standards for
the proposed uses. New landscaped areas, will be provided essentially along the perimeter
of the project site with special emphasis along the Main Street &ontage. The landscaped area
will include grass turf and shrubs. The total on-site and off-site landscaping area proposed
is 9,042 square feet.
Page 1
~\f?-
-,-
r........__...o:
-
A:\IIIJ\linda\is9807.neg
city of chula vista planning department
environmental review section
EXHIRTT "R"
CITY OF
CHULA VISL
The project will require granting of a discretionary permit of approval from the City of Chula
Vista Design Review Committee and the Redevelopment Agency and will require that the
applicant obtain permits from the Air Pollution Control District and the San Diego County
Department of Environmental Health.
C. Compatibilitv with Zoning and Plans
The current zoning on-site is ILP (Limited Industrial Precise Plan) and the site is designated
as Limited Industrial use by the City's General Plan. The proposed project is in compliance
with the Zoning designation and the adopted General Plan.
D. Identification of Environmental Effects
An Initial Study conducted by the City ofChula Vista (including an attached Environmental
Checklist form) determined that the proposed project will not have a significant
environmental effect, and the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report will not be
required. This Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in accordance with Section
15070 of the State CEQA Guidelines.
1. Public Services Impact
Fire
The nearest fire station is located about 5 miles from the project site. The estimated
response time is less than seven (7) minutes. The response time complies with the
City Threshold Standards for fire and medical response time. The Fire Department
will review the building construction plans to ensure that the proposed construction
complies with applicable California Building Code regulations, including installation
of underground fuel tanks.
Police
The Police Department indicates that current levels of service and response time will
be provided to the proposed land uses.
2. Utilitv and Service Svstems
Soils
The applicant will be Tequired to prepare an updated soils report as part of the
standard conditions of the proposed grading plan. The applicant shall comply with
the applicable recommendations as determined by the City engineer.
A: \llb\linda \is9807. neg
Page 2
Drainage
On-site
The Engineering Division indicates that existing on-site drainage patterns will need
to connect to public storm drain facilities. The applicant will be required as a
standard condition by the Engineering Division to submit hydraulic study and car
wash water recycling plan with the first submittal of grading/improvement plans. The
on-site drainage plan will address the prevention of contamination of soils and
groundwater fTom underground fuel tanks and the car wash and food mart/drive-thru
restaurant operations. As a standard permitting procedure, the applicant will be
required to obtain a permit from the County of San Diego Environmental Health
Department, who will oversee the installation of the underground fuel tanks in
conjunction with the City's Fire Department and the Regional Water Quality Control
Board.
Off-site
The Engineering Division states that there is an existing curb inlet and a manhole on
the south side of Main Street and three curb inlets on the north side of Main Street.
Through the preparation and submittal of the aforementioned hydraulic plan the
Engineering Division will be able to determine the type of storm drain pipes, their
size and the existing routing pattern. This report will be required with the first
submittal of grading/improvement plans. The developer is required to implement
Best Management Practices to prevent pollution of storm drainage facilities per City
ofChula Vista Municipal code 14.20. A National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) Permit is not required because the subject site is less than five
acres.
Sewer
Sewage flows and volumes are currently being adequately maintained. A 10 inch
sewer main flows in a westerly direction in Main Street. The Engineering Division
states that the Salt Creek sewer main will provide additional capacity and thus ensure
future development in the area has no adverse impact to existing seweT facilities. The
proposed project will comply with City adopted Sewer Threshold Standards. A
wastewater industrial permit may also be required from the City of San Diego
Metropolitan Wastewater Department. As a standard engineering condition the car
wash will be required to be equipped with an automatic water recycling system.
A:\lIb\linda\is9807.neg Page 3
Streetsrrraffic
The Threshold Standards Policy requires that all signalized arterial segments operate
at a Level of Service (LOS) "C" or better, with the exception that Level of Service
(LOS) "D" may occur during the peak two hours of the day at signalized
intersections. No intersection may reach an LOS "F" during the average weekday
peak hour. Intersections of arterials with fi'eeway ramps are exempt from this policy.
The proposed pToject would comply with this Threshold Policy for the immediately
affected intersection of Main Street and Mace Street.
Pursuant to a traffic study prepared by Willdan, (3/20/00) the proposed project will
generate a total Average Daily Traffic of2,580 driveway daily trips. A great majority
of these trips (79 %) are considered to be pass-by trips (trips where the primary
destiny is not the proposed project). Three intersections analyzed by the report
included Main Street and Hilltop Drive, Main Street and Albany Avenue, and Main
Street and Mace Street. The three intersections are currently operating at a Level of
Service "c" or better. The first two intersections are signalized and would continue
to operate at an LOS "c" with the proposed project. The "T" intersection of Main
& Mace Street is presently unsignalized and would continue to operate at an LOS
"B" during AM Peak hour traffic and LOS "D" during PM Peak hour traffic. The
Engineering Division has reviewed the report findings and concurs that both Main
Street and Mace Street have adequate street volume capacity to serve the project. The
EngineeTing Division indicates that the project has been found to be consistent with
the General Plan Traffic Element. The applicant will be required to make minor
street dedication and improvements along Main Street and improvements along Mace
Street frontages per the City Engineering Division. No traffic impact mitigation will
be required.
3. Noise
Proiect operation
An acoustical report prepared for the proposed project identified three main sources
of noise associated with the proposed project. The project would generate I.)
construction noise 2.) equipment noise (PA menu ordering) and 3.) mobile noise
generally from vehicles utilizing drive-thru. The nearby sensitive noise receptor is
an existing home located west of the site in an industrially designated site. The report
findings indicate that the vehicle noise and the outside P A system would not generate
noise levels that would adversely impact the adjacent residence located over fifty feet
from the proposed location of the drive-thru restaurant. Additionally, the applicant
proposes to construct a nine-foot wall that would effectively further reduce the
projected acceptable noise levels by 15 dBA. No mitigation will be required.
A: \lIb\linda \is9807. neg
Page 4
. -_.',..__..,._~.. -.......-. ......--.--.-
Construction
Temporary construction noise would occur at the site, howeveT, the short term nature
o f the noise, the proximity of a major arterial and the commercial/industrial nature
of the surrounding aTea results in less than significant impacts. No mitigation will
be required.
4. Aesthetics
The proposed project will be subject to review and approval by the Design Review
Committee (DRC). The proposed site plan, architectural design, landscaping and
lighting plans will be subject to review by the DRC to ensure the proposed project
will complement surrounding development and comply with all applicable design
and landscaping standards.
5. Air Oualitv
The project has the potential approval will generate an incremental increase in short
and long-term emissions associated with a small increase in traffic. Redevelopment
of the subject site is consistent with the zoning and general plan designations and is
therefore consistent with the goals and objectives of the Regional Air Quality
Strategy (RAQS). The traffic will be generated for the most part from the local
existing surrounding area and is not expected to induce growth in other areas of the
community. The majority of the tTaffic associated with the pToject is considered to
be pass-by traffic (traffic already on the roadway and stopping for services on the
way to another pTimary destiny, per the San Diego Association of Governments
(SANDAG) publication entitled "Trip Generation Manual").The proposed
redevelopment project will therefore not result in a significant air quality impact.
The applicant will also be required to obtain a permit from the Air Pollution Control
District (APCD) regarding the installation of vapor recovery systems associated with
the fuel pumps and underground fuel storage tanks. No mitigation will be required.
6. Hazardous Waste
A phase I environmental site assessment was conducted by GEOCON Environmental
Consultants for the subject site. The report is dated March 10, 2000. A review of
aerial photographs indicate previous site use as an auto wrecking yard. The
environmental consultant indicates that sites used as former wrecking yards are
commonly impacted with potentially hazardous wastes such as metals, petroleum
hydrocarbons and solvents. The consultant recommends limited soil sampling and
laboratory analyses to investigate the potential presence of impacts to soil resulting
A: \llb\linda \is9807. neg
Page 5
APR-11-00
TUE
1:3 : 4 '3
GARY
ENG. INC_
P _ 01
Apr
10 00 08:10a World~ide
01/10/00 MON 07;(7 FAX 61S 476 5310
Pet.roleum Co
CHI'LA VISTA COM)!.
(8581455-5355
p.l
DEVEL.
Ii/] 003
from previous on-site activitie5. A l11itigatiQn measure will be required in order It,
addr~ss potential impacts to soils, groundwater and the proposed food rcJated
uses.
E Mili~ation Nece>s'~ry tQ.fo,void SiQ11jlicaot Eff~.
Sp~ciCic project luitigation measures are required to reduce potential ~nvirQnmonlal imp:ICtj;
idcDtified in the Initial Study for this pmjeCI to a level below significant, The mitigatior
measurcs will be made a condition of approval, as weB as requirements of the attilchec
. Miti~ation Mnnitoo.ng J'lTOgr.:...tn (At'tlle;hmcnt itA").
1 agree tC'l implement the required mitigation mc:asurc(s) iU staled bdow:
_6t.<.-J1~.
L/-I/-ocJ
Date
I. Prior the i5suance of any grading Or consu'Uclion pennit, the applicant sh;l,jJ be
requiredtQ contract wilh a registered geologist or certified civil engineer i.c the Stal.
of Californi~ to conduct Soiltesli.ng for haz3J'dous wasle materiaJs and to entcr inlc
the voluntary Sile Assessmem &. Mitigation Program as administered by the Sar.
Di~go County Department of Environmental HeaJth who will oversee the results of
the soils leSt and recommend appropriate remcciia',on as roquired.
F. ~.,QJ1Snllation
I. fu.Qividuals and Onanl2ation~
City of Chula VisUl:
Benjamin Guerrero, Communily Devclopmcl1t
Samir Nuhaily, Engineertoe
Muna Cuthhert, Engineerin8
Majed A!-Ghaiiy. Engineering
Ralph Leyva, Engineering
Brad Kemp, Building Division
Doug Perry. Fire D~pa.r\menl
Rich3Id Preuss. Crime Prevention
A;\Ub\l/J1d,\i~?~iJ7 ,I1CB
P.~t. 6
Chula Vista City School District: Dr. Lowell Billings
Sweetwater Union High School District: Katy Wright
Applicant's Agent: Robert G. Faudoa, Project Manager/Gary Eng.
2. Documents
Chula Vista General Plan (1989) and EIR (1989)
Title 19, Chula Vista Municipal Code
Noise Analysis (3/13/00),lnvestigative Science & Eng., Acoustical Consultants
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (3/00) Geocon Environmental Consultants
Traffic Study (Revised 3/20/00, Main & Mace) Willdan
Soils Report (7/10/81) William S. Krooskos & Associates
3. Initial Studv
This environmental determination is based on the attached Initial Study, any
comments received on the Initial Study and any comments received during the public
review period for this Mitigated Negative Declaration. The report reflects the
independent judgement of the City ofChula Vista. Further information regarding the
environmental review of this project is available from the Chula Vista Planning
Department, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 91910.
~~
Brian Hunt r
Planning & Environmental Manager
Date: 1- 7 ' 00
A:\llb\linda\is9807.neg
Page 7
Case No. IS-00-14
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
1.
Name of Proponent:
2.
Lead Agency Name and Address:
3.
Address and Phone Nnmber of Proponent:
4.
Name of Proposal:
5.
Date of Checklist:
I. LAND USE AND PLANNING: Would the
proposal:
a) Conflict with general plan designation or
zoning?
b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or
policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction
over the project?
c) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g.,
impacts to soils or f<jnnlands, or impacts from
incompatible land uses)?
d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of
an established community (including a low-
income or minority community)?
Comments:
Ali Amani, Worldwide Petroleum Co.
City of Chula Vista
276 Fourth A venue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
1768 EI Paso Real
La Jolla, CA. 92037
(619) 920-2827
Chula Vista Food Mart & Car Wash
April 6, 2000
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigaled
LeSSlhan
Significant
Impact
N.
Impact
II;!
II;!
II;!
II;!
The vacant site is zoned Limited Industrial Precise Plan (ILP) and designated for
Research and Limited Industrial use by the City's General Plan. The proposed project
would require review by the Design Review Committee. No adverse impacts or conflicts
with the zoning or General Plan are noted.
o
o
o
A: \llb\linda \is9808ck.frm
Page 1
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Potentially
Potentially Significant Less than
Significant Unless Significant No
Impact Mitigated Impact Impact
II. POPULATION AND HOUSING: Would the
proposal:
a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local 0 0 0 II!I
population projections?
b) Induce substantial growth in an area either 0 0 0 II!I
directly or indirectly (e.g., through projects in
an undeveloped area or extension of major
infrastructure )?
c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable 0 0 0 II!I
housing?
Comments: The proposed project would not contribute to local population growth nor displacement
of existing housing. No adverse impacts are noted.
III. GEOPHYSICAL: Would the proposal result in or
expose people to potential impacts involving:
a) Unstable earth conditions or changes in
geologic substructures?
b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or
overcovering of the soil?
c) Change in topography or ground surface relief
features?
d) The destruction, covering or modification of
any unique geologic or physical features?
e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils,
either on or off the site?
f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach
sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or
erosion which may modify the channel of a
river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any
bay inlet or lake?
g) Exposure of people or property to geologic
hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud
slides, ground failure, or similar hazards?
0 0 0 II!I
0 0 0 II!I
0 0 0 II!I
0 0 0 II!I
0 0 0 II!I
0 0 0 II!I
o
o
o
II!I
No adverse impacts regarding soils or geophysical conditions are noted. A soils report
prepared by William Krooskos & Associates on July 10, 1981 for the subject site has
been submitted by the applicant's agent. The report indicates that the site contains
medium expansive, sandy, clay soils capable of supporting an industrial structure(s). A
Comments:
A: \llb\!inda \is9808ck. frm
Page 2
Potentially
Potentially Significant Less than
Significant Unless Significant N.
Impact Mitigated Impact Impact
more up to date soils report addressing the proposed project structures shall be submitted
by the applicant as a standard condition of grading penn it approval. No mitigation will
be required.
IV. WATER: Would the proposal result in:
a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, 0 0 0 0
or the rate and amount of surface runoff?
b) Exposure of people or property to water related 0 0 0 0
hazards such as flooding or tidal waves?
c) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration 0 0 0 0
of surface water quality (e.g., temperature,
dissolved oxygen or turbidity)?
d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any 0 0 0 0
water body?
e) Changes in currents, or the course of direction 0 0 0 0
of water movements, in either marine or fresh
waters?
f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either 0 0 0 0
through direct additions or withdrawals, or
through interception of an aquifer by cuts or
excavations?
g) Altered direction or rate of flow of 0 0 0 0
groundwater?
h) Impacts to groundwater quality? 0 0 0 0
i) Alterations to the course or flow of flood 0 0 0 0
waters?
j) Substantial reduction in the amount of water 0 0 0 0
otherwise available for public water supplies?
Comments:
The subject site is located in a fully urban setting and represents infill development. The
project site is not within a flood plain. On-site drainage facilities design will need to take
into consideration pollution prevention devices and filtration systems in order to prevent
contamination of soils and groundwater from underground fuel tanks, car wash and food
mart. The Engineering Division states that on-site drainage facilities and devices be
incorporated in the design with the first submittal of the grading and improvement plans
as part of the standard requirements for new construction. The applicant will be required
by the Engineering Division to submit a hydraulic study and car wash water recycling
plan with the first submittal of gradinglimprovement plans. A stonn water industrial
pennit may be required from the State Water Resources Control Board. As standard
pennitting procedure, the applicant will be required to obtain a penn it from the County
of San Diego Environmental Health Hazardous Materials Division for underground fuel
A: \llb\linda \is9808ck.frm
Page 3
Potentially
Potentially Significant Less than
Significant Unless Significant No
Impact Mitigated Impact Impact
tank installation. This established process includes review and approval by the City of
Chula Vista's Fire Department and Building Division. No adverse impacts to water
resources are noted. No mitigation will be required.
V. AIR QUALITY: Would the proposal:
a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to
an existing or projected air quality violation?
o
o
181
o
b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants?
o
o
o
181
c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature,
or cause any change in climate, either locally or
regionally?
d) Create objectionable odors?
o
o
o
181
o
o
o
181
e) Create a substantial increase in stationary or
non-stationary sources of air emissions or the
deterioration of ambient air quality?
o
o
181
o
Comments:
The project will subject to standard requirements regarding the installation of fuel vapor
recovery systems aimed at reducing contaminants released to the air. The applicant will
be required to comply with these and other standard requirements as part of the existing
permitting process which involves the San Diego County Department of Environmental
Health Hazardous Materials Division, the Air Pollution control District, and the City's
Fire Department. No mitigation will be required.
VI. TRANSPORT ATION/CIRCULA TION: Would
the proposal result in:
a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? 0 0 181 0
b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., 0 0 0 181
sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
c) Inadequate emergency access or access to 0 0 0 181
nearby uses?
d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? 0 0 0 181
e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or 0 0 0 181
bicyclists?
f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting 0 0 0 181
alternative transportation (e.g. bus turnouts,
bicycle racks)?
0 0 0 181
A: \llb\linda \is9808ck.frm Page 4
g) Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts?
h) A "large project" under the Congestion
Management Program? (An equivalent of2400
or more average daily vehicle trips or 200 or
more peak-hour vehicle trips.)
Comments:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Miligated
No
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact
o
o
I!
o
Main Street, classified as a four-lane major arterial by the City's Circulation Element, will
provide the primary access to the project site. A traffic analysis was prepared for the
proposed project on March 20, 2000 by Willdan consultants. The traffic report stated that
a total of2,580 driveway daily trips, will be potentially generated by this project. A great
majority of these trips are considered to be pass-by trips (trips not actually generated by
this project). Three critical intersections in the vicinity of the project were analyzed by
the traffic study. These intersections were Main Street and Hilltop Drive, Main Street and
Albany Avenue, and Main Street and Mace Street. The three intersections are currently
operating at a Level of Service "C" or better. The first two intersections are signalized
and would continue to operate at an LOS "C" with the proposed project. The "T"
intersection of Main & Mace Street is presently unsignalized and would continue to
operate at an LOS "B" during AM Peak hour traffic and LOS "D" during PM Peak hour
traffic. Based on City ofChula Vista traffic threshold standards for intersections, this is
an acceptable LOS for existing and proposed project conditions. The traffic report does
not recommend any off-site traffic improvements. The Engineering Division will, as
standard condition of design review, require on-site and project frontage improvements
on Main Street and Mace Street. No mitigation will be required.
VII. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Would the
proposal result in impacts to:
a) Endangered, sensitive species, species of 0 0 I! 0
concern or species that are candidates for
listing?
b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage 0 0 0 I!
trees)?
c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g, 0 0 0 I!
oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)?
d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian and 0 0 0 I!
vernal pool)?
e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? 0 0 0 I!
f) Affect regional habitat preservation planning .0 0 0 I!
efforts?
Comments: The project site is located in an urbanized area and is cleared of all vegetation. There are
presently no native piants or sensitive animal species. The site is located in the midst of
a highly urbanized and trafficked area and does not represent viable habitat for any
A: \llb\linda \is9808ck. fnn
Page 5
Potentially
Potentially Significant less than
Significant Unless Significant No
Impact Mitigued Impact Impact
animal species.
VIII. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES:
Would the proposal:
a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation 0 0 0 Ii!
plans?
b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and 0 0 0 Ii!
inefficient manner?
c) If the site is designated for mineral resource 0 0 0 ~
protection, will this project impact this
protection?
Comments: No impacts to non-renewable resources are noted.
IX. HAZARDS: Would the proposal involve:
a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of 0 0 0 Ii!
hazardous substances (including, but not limited
to: petroleum products, pesticides, chemicals or
radiation)?
b) Possible interference with an emergency 0 0 0 ~
response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
c) The creation of any health hazard or potential 0 0 0 ~
health hazard?
d) Exposure of people to existing sources of 0 ~ 0 0
potential health hazards?
e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable 0 0 0 ~
brush, grass, or trees?
Comments:
A phase I environmental site assessment was conducted by GEOCON Environmental
Consultants for the subject site. A review of aerial photographs indicate previous site use
as an auto wrecking yard. The report indicates that sites fonnerly used as wrecking yards
could potentially be impacted with hazardous wastes such as metals, petroleum
hydrocarbons and solvents. The report recommends limited soil sampling and laboratory
analyses to investigate the potential presence of impacts to soil resulting from previous
on-site activities. A mitigation measure will be required in order to address potential
impacts to soils, groundwater and the proposed food related uses. The proposed project
shall also comply with all appiicable standard required permitting processes administered
by local, state and federal agencies. Compliance with established standard procedures
will ensure that people will not be exposed to accidental health hazards related to the
proposed fueling station. The project proponent will, as standard procedure be subject to
review and approval by the County of San Diego Environmental Health regarding the
A: \lIb\linda \is9808ck. frm
Page 6
Potentially
POlenlially Significant less than
Significanl Unless Significant No
Impacl Miligaled Impact Impacl
proposed installation of underground fuel tanks.
X. NOISE: Would the proposal result in:
a) Increases in existing noise levels? D D Ii'J D
b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? D D D Ii'J
Comments: Surrounding land uses include mixed commercial, residential and light industrial. An
existing legal non-conforming single family detached residence is directly adjacent to the
southwest comer of the project site. Surrounding properties are designated for industrial
zoning and land use by the City's Zoning and General Plan. The topography of the site
and surrounding adjacent areas is level. A Noise study prepared by Investigative Science
and Engineering on March 20, 2000 indicates that the project site and surrounding
property is impacted by surface street traffic and auto repair shop activities immediately
west of the site. The hourly average sound level (or Leq-h) recorded over the monitoring
period was 58.1 dBA. The applicable significance criteria as established by the City of
Chula Vista Noise Ordinance would permit a 62.5 dBA Leq between the hours of 7:00
a.m. to 10:00 p.m. and 57.5 dBA Leq between 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. The proposed
drive-thru restaurant would be located about 50 feet away from the existing single family
residence. The traffic increment solely associated with the drive-thru facility (estimated
at ISO daily trips) would generate a negligible (less than 0.5 dBA) increase in the ambient
noise level at the project site. Due to the small size of the drive-thru facility (2,388
square-feet) it is anticipated that the refrigeration units, based on building industry
standards would produce a noise factor of between 58 and 60 dBA at IS feet from the
source. With proper unit installation and standard shielding, the worst-case nighttime
property line standard of 57.5 dBA would be achievable. Therefore, no significant
impacts are expected due to ancillary equipment operation at the proposed drive-thru
facility. The noise study also looked at the potential for the outdoor speaker to create
noise impact. The outdoor speaker has the potential to create noise levels approaching
60 dBA at 30 feet from the source. The residential structure is 30 feet away from the
proposed location of the outdoor speaker. Additionally, allowing for an average
distribution of ISO ADT/24 Hours or 6.25 trips per hour (each with a speaker duration of
I minute) gives an hourly property lirie level of 41.2 dBA (in the presence of other
surrounding noises) which is currently below the ambient daytime measured level. It is
also noted that the project design incorporates the use of a 9-foot-high (at grade level)
screen wall along the property line located between the project site and the closest
residential receptor. The use of this screen wall would provide an additional maximum
of 15-dBA reduction to ground level receptors at this closest residential structure.
Therefore the report concludes that no direct impacts resulting from the operation of the
proposed drive-thru facility are expected. Temporary construction noise would occur at
the site, however, the short term nature of the noise, the proximity of major arterials and
the commerciallindustrial nature of the surrounding area results in less than significant
impacts. No adverse impacts are noted. No mitigation will be required.
XI. PUBLIC SERVICES: Would the proposal have
A. \llb\Jinda \is9808ck. frm
Page 7
Potentially
Potentially Significant L.essthan
Significant Unless Significant No
Impact Mitigated Impact Impact
an effect upon, or result in a need for new or
altered government services in any of the following
areas:
a) Fire protection? D D D !!
b) Police protection? D D D !!
c) Schools? D D D !!
d) Maintenance of public facilities, including D D D !!
roads?
e) Other governmental services? D D D !!
Comments:
No new Governmental services will be required to serve the project. No adverse impacts
are noted. Fire and police protection can adequately be provided. Appropriate school
fees will be paid. Street dedication and improvements along Main Street and
improvements along Mace Street will be made in accordance with City Standards. No
mitigation will be required.
D
D
D
!!
XII. THRESHOLDS: Will the proposal adversely
impact the City's Threshold Standards?
As described below, the proposed project does not adversely impact any of the seen Threshold
Standards.
a) FirelEMS
D
D
D
!!
The Threshold Standards requires that fire and medical units must be able to respond to calls
within 7 minutes or less in 85% of the cases and within 5 minutes or less in 75% of the cases.
The City of Chula Vista has indicated that this threshold standard will be met, since the
nearest fire station is 2 miles away and would be associated with a 5-minute response time.
The proposed project will comply with this Threshold Standard. .
Comments:
The Fire Department indicates that nearest fire statio~ is located within 2 miles and
adequate fire service and protection can be provided to the proposed project site.
b) Police
D
D
D
!!
The Threshold Standards require that police units must respond to 84% of Priority 1 calls
within 7 minutes or less and maintain an average response time to all Priority 1 calls of 4.5
minutes or less. Police units must respond to 62.10% of Priority 2 calls within 7 minutes or
less and maintain an average response time to all Priority 2 calls of 7 minutes or less. The
proposed project is located in an area where police ART data for priority 1 and Priority 2 calls
is currently unavailable.
Comments:
The Police Department indicates that current levels of police service can continue to be
provided to the area where the subject site is located. Crime Prevention personnel are
available to assist the applicant with security recommendations. No significant adverse
impacts to Police service are noted. No mitigation will be required.
A; \llh\linda \is9808ck. fnn
Page 8
Potentially
Potentially Significant Less than
Significant Unless Significant No
Impact Mitigated Impact Impact
C) Traffic 0 0 I!iJ 0
The Threshold Standards require that all signalized arterial segments operate at a Level of
Service (LOS) "C" or better, with the exception that Level of Service (LOS) "D" may occur
during the peak two hours of the day at signalized intersections. Intersections west ofI-80S
are not to operate at a LOS below their 1987 LOS. No intersection may reach LOS "E" or "F"
during the average weekday peak hour. Intersections of arterials with freeway ramps are
exempted from this Standard. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold
Standard.
Comments: The Engineering Division concurs with the traffic study prepared by Willdan (3/20100)
that the current Level-of- Service (LOS) "C" enjoyed by Main Street and Mace Street,
would remain the same with approval of the proposed project. The Engineering Division
reviewed traffic data for Main Street and Mace Street and concluded that these would be
adequate to serve the proposed project subject to standard dedication of r.o.w. and
improvement along the frontage of Main Street and improvement along the frontage of
Mace Street to City Engineering standards. No mitigation will be required.
d) ParkslRecreation
o
o
o
I!iJ
The Threshold Standard for Parks and Recreation is 3 acresll ,000 population. This
standard does not apply to the proposed project.
Comments: No adverse impacts to parks or recreational opportunities are noted.
e) Drainage
o
o
o
I!iJ
The Threshold Standards require that stonn water flows and volumes not exceed
City Engineering Standards. Individual projects will provide necessary
improvements consistent with the Drainage Master Plan(s) and City Engineering
Standards. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold Standard.
Comments:
Off-siie drainage facilities exist in the area and pipe capacity will be looked at through
the standard submittal of a hydraulic plan with the first submittal of grading/improvement
plans per the Engineering Division.
f) Sewer
o
o
I!iJ
o
The Threshold Standards require that sewage flows and volumes not exceed City
Engineering Standards. Individual projects will provide necessary improvements
consistent with Sewer Master Plan(s) and City Engineering Standards. The
proposed project will comply with this Threshold Standard.
Comments:
Sewer capacities will not be adversely affected through project implementation. The
existing adjacent sewer lines will be evaluated by the Engineering Division as necessary
at the design stage of the project. The Salt Creek Trunk Sewer will eliminate any potential
A:\l!b\linda\is9808ck.frm Page 9
Potentially
Significanl
Impacl
PotentiaJJy
Significant
Unles5
Mitigated
Les51han
Significant
Impact
N.
Impacl
capacity problems. No mitigation is required.
g) Water
o
o
o
Ii!
The Threshold Standards require that adequate storage, treatment, and transmission facilities
are constructed concurrently with planned growth and that water quality standards are not
jeopardized during growth and construction. The proposed project will comply with this
Threshold Standard.
Applicants may also be required to participate in whatever water conservation or fee off-
set program the City of Chula Vista has in effect at the time of building penn it issuance.
Comments: Water quality standards with respect to adequate storage, treatment and transmission
facilities would not be affected as a result of project approval.
XIII UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: Would
the proposal result in a need for new systems, or
substantial alterations to the following utilities:
a) Power or natural gas? 0 0 0 Ii!
b) Communications systems? 0 0 0 Ii!
c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution 0 0 0 Ii!
facilities?
d) Sewer or septic tanks? 0 0 0 Ii!
e) Stonn water drainage? 0 0 0 Ii!
f) Solid waste disposal? 0 0 0 Ii!
Comments: The proposed uses will not generate a need for new systems or cause alteration to the
aforementioned utilities. The existing sewer lines along Main Street currently have the
capacity to handle ~he proposed sewer per the Engineering Division. The Salt.Creek
Trunk sewer will provide additional capacity in the future. Chula Vista Municipal Code
Section 14.20.120 requires the incorporation of stonn water pollution prevention
measures into the proposed auto repair facility. A stonnwater industrial penn it may be
required from the State Water Resources Control Board. A wastewater industrial permit
may also be required from the City of San Diego Metropolitan Wastewater Department.
No mitigation will be required, since these would become standard conditions of project
of approval once a detennination is made that these will be required.
XIV AESTHETICS: Would the proposal:
a) Obstruct any scenic vista or view open to the
public or will the proposal result in the creation
of an aesthetically offensive site open to public
o
o
o
Ii!
A: \l!b\Jinda\is9808ck, fon
Page 10
Potentially
Potential1y Significant Less than
Significant Unless Significant No
Impact Mitigated Impact Impact
view?
b) Cause the destruction or modification of a 0 0 0 181
scenic route?
c) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? 0 0 0 181
d) Create added light or glare sources that could 0 0 0 181
increase the level of sky glow in an area or
cause this project to fail to comply with Section
19.66.100 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code,
Title 19?
e) Reduce an additional amount of spill light? 0 0 0 181
Comments: Approval of the project design, lighting and landscaping is subject to a discretionary
Design Review process. No mitigation will be required.
XV CULTURAL RESOURCES: Would the proposal:
a) Will the proposal result in the alteration of or 0 0 0 181
the destruction or a prehistoric or historic
archaeological site?
b) Will the proposal result in adverse physical or 0 0 0 181
aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic
building, structure or object?
c) Does the proposal have the potential to cause a 0 0 0 181
physical change which would affect unique
ethnic cultural values?
d) Will the proposal restrict existing religious or 0 0 0 181
sacred uses within the potential impact area?
e) Is the area identified on the City's General Plan 0 0 0 181
EIR as an area of high potential for
archeological resources?
Comments: There are no identified cultural resources within the project area.
XVI PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Will the 0 0 0 181
proposal result in the alteration of or the
destruction of paleontological resources?
Comments: There are no identified paleontological resources within the project area.
XVII RECREATION: Would the proposal:
A: \Ilb\linda \is980Hck. frm
Page 11
Potentially
Potenlially Significant Less than
Significant Unless Significant No
Impact Mitigated Impact Impact
a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or 0 0 0 I8J
regional parks or other recreational facilities?
b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? 0 0 0 I8J
c) Interfere with recreation parks & recreation 0 0 0 I8J
plans or programs?
Comments:
There are no recreational facilities that will be adversely affected by the proposed auto
repair operations.
XVIII MANDA TORY FINDINGS OF
SIGNIFICANCE: See Negative Declarationfor
mandatory findings of significance. If an EIR is
needed, this section should be completed.
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade
the quality of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species,
cause a fish or wildlife population to drop
below self-sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce
the number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods or
California history or prehistory?
Comments:
o
o
o
I8J
The site is presently vacant and cleared and graded of all plant materials. The site lies
within a fully urbanized area and does not represent viable habitat for any sensitive
animal species.
b) Does the project have the potential to achieve
short-tenn, to the disadvantage oflong-tenn,
environmental goals?
Comments:
o
o
o
I8J
The scope and nature of the project would not result in the curtailment of any long-tenn
environmental goals.
c) Does the project have impacts that are
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable"
means that the incremental effects of a project
are considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the effects of
other current projects, and the effects of
probable future projects.)
o
o
o
I8J
A: \lJb\linda \is9808ck. frm
Page 12
Comments:
PotentiaJly
Potentially Significant
Significant Unless
Impact Mitigated
There are no incremental impacts associated with the project.
Less than
Significant
Impact
N.
Impact
d) Does the project have environmental effect
which will cause substantial adverse effects on
human beings, either directly or indirectly?
Comments: No adverse effects to human beings is anticipated from construction and operation of the
proposed project. The applicant will be required to comply' with mitigation involving
limited soil sampling in order to detect the presence of hazardous wastes on the subject
site due to previous use of the site as an auto wrecking yard (see section XIX below).
Compliance with the mitigation measure will ensure potential impacts are reduced to less
than significant.
o
181
o
o
XIX. PROJECT REVISIONS OR MITIGATION MEASURES:
I. Prior to the issuance of any grading or construction penn it, the applicant shall be required to contract
with a registered geologist or certified civil engineer in the State of Cali fomi a to conduct soil testing
for hazardous waste materials and to enter in the voluntary Site Assessment & Mitigation Program
as administered by the San Diego County Department of Environmental Health who will oversee
the results of the soils test and recommend appropriate remediation as required.
XX. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least
one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated," as
indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
0 Land Use and Planning 0 TransportationlC irculation 0 Public Services
0 Population and Housing 0 Biological Resources 0 Utilities and Service
Systems
0 Geophysical o Energy and Mineral Resources 0 Aesthetics
0 Water I:8J Hazards (Hazardous Waste) 0 Cultural Resources
0 Air Quality 0 Noise 0 Recreation
0 Mandatory Findings of Significance
A: \lIh\linda \is9808ck. frm
Page 13
...--._.~"
XXI. DETERMINATION:
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the 0
environment, and a NEGA TIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
[ find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the 181
environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation
measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A MITIGATED
NEGA TIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an 0
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but 0
at least one effect: I) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to
applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the
earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "potentially significant
impacts" or "potentially significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the 0
environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially
significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to
applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR,
including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project.
An addendum has been prepared to provide a record of this detennination.
~~~
April 6. 2000
Date
Planning & Environmental Manager
City ofChula Vista
A: \llb\linda \is9808ck. frm
Page 14
ATTACHMENT "A"
Mitigation Monitoring Program
15-00-14
This Mitigation Monitoring Program is prepared for the Chula Vista Food Mart & car wash to be
located at the southeast corner of Main Street and Mace Street in the City of Chula Vista. The
legislation requires public agencies to ensure that adequate mitigation measures are implemented
and monitored on Mitigated Negative Declarations, such as IS-00-14.
AB 3180 requires monitoring of potentially significant and/or significant environmental inipacts.
The mitigation monitoring program for this project ensures adequate implementation of mitigation
for the following potential impact(s): Hazardous Waste.
Due to the nature of the environmental issues identified, the Mitigation Compliance Coordinator
(MCC), shall be the Planning & Environmental Manager for the Community Development
Department in the City of Chula Vista. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that
the conditions of the Mitigation Monitoring Program are met to the satisfaction of the Planning
& Environmental Manager. Evidence in written form confirming compliance with the mitigation
measure specified in Mitigated Negative Declaration No. IS-00-14 shall be provided by the
applicant identified in the attached Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Checklist, to the Planning
& Environmental Manager within one week of compliance with said mitigation measure. The
Planning & Environmental Manager will thus provide the ultimate verification that the mitigation
measure has been accomplished.
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING CHECKLIST
PROJECT NAME: Chula Vista Food Mart & Car Wash
INITIAL STUDY NO: 00-14
Issue Area
Hazardous Waste
Mitigation Measure # 1
"Prior to the issuance of any grading or construction permit, the applicant shall be required to
contract with a registered geologist or certified civil engineer in the State of California to conduct
soil testing for hazardous waste materials and to enter in the voluntary Site Assessment & Mitigation
Program as administered by the San Diego County Department of Environmental Health who will
oversee the results of the soils test and recommend appropriate remediation as required. "
Full compliance with this mitigation will help identifY and if required reduce potential impacts to
the subject site by a previous auto wrecking that may have contaminated on-site soils.
Proiect Phase Implementation (Proiect Design: Construction: Post Construction)
Prior to the issuance of any grading or construction permits means that this will be a condition of
approval reflected in DRC conditions. All grading and working drawings will be subject to review
by the Planning & Building, Engineering and Community Development Departments to ensure
implementation of this mitigation measure.
Responsible Agencv (ies)'
City Planning & Building Department
City Engineering Division
Community Development Department
2
;Vj
E
I~'i
o
R
_?J..
n
_\
D
u
M
January 19, 2000
File# 0600-30-ZG-652
TO:
Steve Power, Planning Department
~;;;~:~: L. Sw~eon, "epuCy publio Worke Direocor/Ci~
Sohaib Al-Agha, Senior Civil Engineer~~
Ralph R. Le}~a, Senior Civil Engine~~'
Design Review Applicatio~ ror 3733 M~~'Street (your File
No. DRC-00-42).
V"lJ:..:
FROM:
SL'BJ3CT:
- --~ :-'";..;..::_.:.. 2 i';::-:::-.!":.s De:;:.=..~-:m=:-2t. ':-.:.2.5 .:-e.,,-.:.e-v.'ec. _u_ sc.j ec-:. ;:~oposal. w~
do ~ot p=opose the i~clusion of a~y concii::ions of approval of the
Design Review ror ;::he subject property. However, we request ;::hat you
previde ~ne applicant with the fcllowing information:
1
The :folTow-{ng~
builCi:':1g- ple.ns
fees w'ill. be
subIT..:t:t.e::
( Q'::;;''::;;'
\---~
requi red .---Sase-d ~ on -the- ~ :f inal
attached Development Checklist
fa::: i;1c,::-e. .:i.nforL:ia::.:::::).-
- .
_-=.~.:=.~- --~-~._.- -.-.------~-
---,,__ _'::":-,c..___.:: ___~ _....___.____......__ ____
D. D~velopment ~mp.=..ct Fees
c. Traffic Signal Fees
2. -~ two feet dedica:::.on of ~:"=~'C-of-way along Main Street is
req-...:.irei.
3. A se~~~~:e sewer cO~~lectio~ ~:ll be ~eq~ired for the car wash
~~~~ d=~~~~ge s~-s:e~.
4. Two Street lights are required, 250 watt on Main Street and 150
watt on M~ce Street.
~ The 3Dgineering Division will require the applicant to obtain
a construction permit to per=crm any work in the City's right
of way, which may include, ~~: is no~ limi~ed to:
EXHIBIT "C"
- .
~~~e~ w~~- ~=~~e=
" ,
rt=---~..... _
'--~._""'----'"",
- ~
,....,,'......-;....,
.'-~- ~.
- -~
- -
-
---- -
E==ee~ =:~~=-~~-~~y.
~---~..~-
~~------'--
'- ~- - I
~"- - -.....
--- ---
o
- ~,~-
-.. - -. .- .
.::- - -=",:::,-',
- - ----
- - -._-
-
~~::=e 1~=-~ E:=~~:
-.......~-- -~-
- - '- -- - .;:;---,= .
- .
~:~e~ Mcce 5~=eet
- -
- -
Ce::::e::-:~_ :":-::'2
- I" ,-.., , ......~.....,
:""v '-....._....-
~--,......
- -
~
-----
-
~-
street right-af-way
Construct curbl gut'ter & five
e~tire Mace Street f~o~tage.
Construct driveway approaches per
Standard NO.1.
Construct Pedestrian Ramp
ccr~er of the i~tersection
(5)
foot
sidewalk
a~O:1g
c_
Chula Vista Constyuc~io~
e_
per ADI..~
of M2i:;.
Sta:1dards
-~
"c
southeast
Street and
Mace Stree't.
c. ~riv'e\\;2}- approaches mus"C De eisht feet -.r.l~lmum ::rom tl1e PCR ana
per Ch~la Vista Standards_
7. 1= the total oD-site excavation exceeds the requirements
prescri~ed by the Ci~y of Chula Vista Grading Ordinance number
l797 Section 15.04.150, a 9r~din9 per~i~ will be requ~red.
-
- -- --
-
~-~-------
--
.-
~=~-~2~~ ~~~= =~e~~
~ -- - ~-
....:::..' --"=:
::-e:;-"':":":':--2me:::'2
-',- '-
--
'---'-
::.:..me
~2.s/:J.e::-
Q-~"~::;;'IO"""""C""'- --'irc..... "'-",l-rop. -.....,,..:;.j........,.- - .......,,-ilQ-,.;............... '!""'\~~-i-r-
'-"v~_ 1.o'.1'~';'lL.. ~c:..J.~....~ ......_G......... ::;..;..l..... w....... c:.. ........'......__ _....l...... I-',-_II'_L..
- - -' -
,-s
pe::::iT:its.
2.p;;l:..ed .Ior, 6epe::1cling upon ::i::3.1 pla:ls submitted for buildi:1g
':':::'5 respo:J.se lS based solel"'l/ D:1 the plans that
W<OY<O
-- -
S~~~lttec =cr o~r revle~.
----._--- -
.,....,-,~
.=,=:::
--~ ---------
-=--,~
~-~
--- -~- I
:~~~~~~~ ~=?~~~~~~~
Carnes P:.:-j::ley, ?e::.lr,:':'s 5e:::.:.c.::
... \.i.i2'CE:J\';;::.".~F:',?E?..':::':'~\:JRCZGf52 ~::-L
~\Ir?-
""'"
DiUlA VISIA
ENGINEERIt-./u
DIVISIO,," OF THE
DEPARTME"-IOF
PUBLIC \...,'ORKS
DEVELOPMENT CHECK LIST
FOR MUNICIPAL CODE REQUIREMENTS
Project Location: 37. ~ ~ F?JHIN
61.
FileNo.
Z-Gf - ceL)?
_w
<<~",~"",*,",<-y-<<:
~"".:<--:
">>>''W.-;':__<-O:':<';':_:':.^,_,~_V....~:
V^'\"0.
DEDICATI01' REQ1.j1REMEJ\"TS :
Acconimg to tho plans you rec::nrJy submitted to tho PJamring De:par1IIrJlt for ",\.;ew, tho items nored below will be :included as conwrions
of approval of YOUI building P=it uncb- the authority of the Chcia Vista Municipal Code. For funher quesrions regarding this cneck
list.. pl::as~ conmct th~ persOIl1isu:d at the bottom 01 the last page.
~eQj~riO:D
:/7/7.":.'//-{
?\ott':
OR :J irrevocable Off",- ofDewcarion of meet right-of-"",y (Brief descnprion: :..---jpch ~;;Z;..n-.. Jp.y 0,
~.'. ...c; ~ . /'> I
----2:. .r"--I"~4'~ '---" \.OC>l.I;./:,,::-::>. . I
~DT lD '=ny J.:JJS?e:uoD' fa; :frammg 0':- ele:::m:::al a~ mt DTOi~:::1 building, g-ranl rieecis mu.s~ bt revIewea by u~. ]0:-
::Dmpl~rene:ss. signed by oWDer(s), v/itb all signatories Dotarized and accepted by the CiTY. Call (619 i 691-5C140 for th=
:-~quired SllppO;rIDg documents to be submitted.
Pl3BUC IMPROVEMD\"T REQUIREME!\"TS :
In ac.=.oTliaD:::: ...rim Se=rioD 12.24.040 of the CDu.i2 Vista Mum:ipal Cod.e and -Coun::U Policy No. 563-01. if 2. Buiiding P~:mJ! is issu~d
fo:- th~ OD-Sj~ work YaIDed a. mDn:!haD me 1:irr=:.shold mrn:::ated in 5~=rion 12..14.020 of th~ C.V.M.C. (520.000 pius m: p~r::01r.agt
___~=T~~ in -mf'~ '":-GoIlS!TllCDOr: COS1-lD.ci:::x':-sm::= ju.h- -1. 199::. as DUDb..sD~d m rot LnP1.neennC- ~;";ev.'S Re::.ordJ. the Cjn' ill2-'- L'DDOS~ fue
_ - - ---- - - -.. ..e: __ 1:>. _. . _ .
!-~quir=:n=:::1: Ie ::Onstr'.l:-7 ::~~ PUDUC irr.lpr0\':::n~LS, wm:::: :::J.2Y :i!J:lui~. DU; ::10: m:::ssa.:-iJy ~: li::!1:iTe;: .c. "t.l.t foll()\'.':;~~:
.~ ':lr-: ~ =-:':'TI~;
, , -
-;;a. Si6eww: \ f;:~~ WJ.:it i
/"-, -
.~lT~~';: v,'icie6:ng
:J iu:us~j ::oD:T=re,'z.sp.ll2jI meciJ2.L
::sJ :J:-:i\'e-.:.,y appTGa:b.
::r Sig:n.aJ relo::arioD
:J ?CC 2.D:;- paving
"",..--- .-
~anQ]::ap ;-amps
:J _.;Jj=y-typ= appToa::il
:J Stomo cL-aID
:J ."->phalt & b2Se m streeI
:J
::r R~la.:::t exisring a....--iveway v.'itb curb, guner, sid.ewalk -1
/
~rre~ light(s) (.2 required) S~ Page 7 for more informarioD
,"
!' Oles: .-.' iDe COIlS1Illcrio~ permit mUSl be issuedberore Framing or Ele::tri:allnspe:tioD may be aone on IDe aD-site Duila.mg.
3) See Page 6 for 1nIOrmarioD regarding deferrals of the requirement to :install public improvem~nIS.
:J II app-...aIs that YOUI project may "'qurre only a m:inor Construction P=t (no eng:ineered improvement pians necessazv) and you
are to submit the following irems:
... lnspecrion f~icL-posit (Amount is derermined based upon estimated value of work to be don~.)
- 1 -
.......-------..-.....--..-
Pl'BLJC I'-1PRO\"EME'\, RE<.. REME'\'TS (Cont'd):
... SU!:);IUr"..2] o~ 2. "T::-z5: Control ?i~ 10: EDgm~n:J..&"~ ~\'j~\.\ 2.:)C zq?;'"(n-a~. (SU~::1.::;::: i:::s: ;.. Sz~':- ?:-JO~ H" !":q:J~Srr..l:
CO!l5t!lJ:rior. ?::TI"'..J: 10 prDnd~ :i.::n~ fo~ r~"'l~W <me :::o:-r-~:::JOlli, ;:- ::~:::S$.2....:'. I
... Submi1 scclrny m tb~ a.n1oum of 110Co/P oithe appro\'~ :-npn:cr'S::.st:u:::la~ ofth: wad: 10 De done. S::::u.'"l::':mzy b= m an:
afthe following forms: Suret)' bond !rom a sur::ty CDm.p2D)' holding a Best's :raring in accordance wnb Cny policy; ]en=-
of credit; U.S. Q==)'; savings passbook; cariiicarr of deposit: b<mI~s cariiied check (NOTE: pel-sonal. company or thin
parry checks are not accc:ptab]e for cash bonds).
+ A proper]y licensed contracIOI mUS! obTain the p=niL He mIlS! firsT submil a Ccn:iiicate of lnsunmce WiTh Thc Cm' of Chulc
Fisw named as addizionol insured and with the foIJo",Wg minimum liabililY 1.in:ri1S as set forth in "Specifications for Publi=
Works CODSIIUcrion" (CommonJy rrfem:d to as the "Grt:eD Book"):
Bodily injUJY:
5500.000 each person
5:.000.000 eacb o:Cu=7:n.:::t'
5LOOO.000 aggregate produclS and completed operanons
Property dmnage:
5250.000 each OCCUlTCllce
5500.000 aggregarr
Note: A combined single limit pplicy with the aggregate limilS in the amount of 52.000.000 will be considered equivaJenl
to therequiredminimUII:. Tnis amount mayb~ ad.iust~d rt1Y v.TItre!! r~ql.!~sI) at tht' ci.iscreriDD Dfme CiTY Engine:::.
'~
1: appears thaI th~ plans v.w :in:::1ud~ tb.~ need to do ma.io:- consuurnoIl 0; re-consuuction of su...-fa::e unprDvemeDts. such as
\'''lj~n!1J.~ the SITee: 0; :i~suilling missing cu::-o. guTI~r. sid~w:ili: anc 2.~h2.1ti: ::::on::::n:tt' p:::.\ing. Tnt' followmg Jrems wilJ at
:-~~u.:reo P:1.0; 10 lSSU2..D.Ct' of me CODSI::1l.:I10D ?e:r:::J.JL (/V.OIC.: ;;ngIDee:eb pi.an.s are Dm: required if ::::UTD5 Dave DeeD CODSU".l::::te.C
In riJ.eir ulrimare 10=aD.oD aDd :ins1alled UD/jeT previously-engineered plans.) T.n~ folloVling iIems are to be submined IO Uris
Q~a.""1D1enI:
... lmpToveII1e:rn plans p;epared by 2 regjs~ed civil eng:in~~ fo; review aDd approyal (D:=pending upon work.ioaci the City's
2v~ge processing time: 3 10 4 weeks for :first Te\'l::w: approximately ~ weeks for any subsequent reviews.)
-+ PlaD-cb.~::::k d~osiL I_oOunount is riepen.dent upon qllamity and/oT cOID?l::xity OfWOTk.. (52.000 minimum)]
GF:....8I:'-C RLQLlREMI~?S:
:J Since ill~ piam sUDmit!o~ for P1amllng's review sbowod ::10 mio=:ion reganinog proposec grading oi tile sitt. I' may bt doto=inoc
2.: tDt' building pe:mi: St2gt' tha.1 2 g;ading p~I'I!:!.i: is T:::qurred. (I: !his is IDt ::2.5:. set' ne:;;:: iI~ fm requirem.eDIS.01
?" h app:::2....."'"S from YOUT plzm thaI a g:rading permit may be requireD- Th~ follo,",wg items must be fuliilled TO obtain the p~t:
+
A g;ading plan must De prepared by a registered civil engin~r and submimd to this depanm~t for review and subsequent
2.pproyal (CiTY's 2.vernge processing time: 3 to 4 weeks for :fi.""S1 review; approxima~ly 2 weeks for any subsequent reviews.)
+
?ci..-:I l2.nds::::apIDf :-:::~:i=-::rne:ms 2.5 se: fortb by the CiTY l..~:is:2pe .i....:-:m:::::. Heisne rn.2y bt :::onta:::tec a: (619) 691-5101.
...
Submit a pJan-check a..-posit Amount is dc:peDdent upon comp1erity and e"'"t.."1lt of project for phm-check in accordance ,,~th
tho CiTy's Full COSlucovery Program (52.000 minimum).
...
Provide security in the amounts of: 25% of estimated earthwork COSIS; 100% of the estimated COSlS of app11IL-nant strucmres
(i.e. r::Jaming walls, cu1v=, inJets stTlh-"tUICS, etc.) as det=ined by the approved engin~s estimate; ] 00% ofhmdscaping and
L.-rigariOD facilities; aDd 100% of la.Dds::ap~ mainrenance for z period stated OD the GTading Permit. The smeT)' fo; these items
may be :in the same fo:m as stated UDder "'Public Improvemem Requirements:' above.
- 2-
GRWL"G RLQU'IREME"TS ( ,'dl:
-"'GTE: ~" "uijillng ?~=; -'~nD; "" IES"e" l::1:L :=iijoaDD~ ::'0= ?''':.~-: "".~.: :b.a; tiJ~ TDugi: ;:aim; i:~, ~e"" :o::::"J~!e::' ,""
fo:1T. 15 2V2iiz~l~ 3~ ~~ Engl.D~:!.:lf DJ\"lSior: COt.:..:l!.:: 211: I:::l:.:s: D:: Sl;n::::C ~y :.!J~ d~\'=lo?~~.~ ~:\'i; Z-::1C ~ui] ==f..:.:)=~5. :.beL
SUOIIDnec 10 tn: ~gin::=;ing DJYisJOr:'slnsp:::non S:::!:JO::::".
GE!\'ERAL REQUIREME,,"SICOMME!',TS:
::J U'Ddergrounding of exisring overhead utility lines OD $]1::.
[) UDd~rgrounding of cllstnDUDOD lines and om::!" ov~hcad utiliti::s in IDe right of way adjacC'Ilt to your site.
~ .A.D en:roa:hm~I penn!: for your proposed private facilities with..in the CiTY'S 5~! right of way and/or t2Semen1. (CalJ for derails)
ENGIJ\'EERING FEES Al'PUCABLE OK BlIILDING PERMIT:
Tn= followmg f~s indicared are applicable to your pr~ject and are requIred to be paid at the rime of issuance of the Building Permit under
the authoDI)' oi the C;I)' oi Cllula V;sta's Master Fee ScheduJe and oth.,. ioes and assessmenTS as approved by the Cjry Council. Please
note thar the fees lisled are based on~J' on the piD.ns submittetf an.d arc subject to change to reflect items shown on the fmal building
plans.
Sewer Fees:
~3:::... ..c,. "';~;~ic.::t:'"2.::\'~ :-':~ Ci:- ~3C).()() fo:- S~wt'::;- CD:::.:J.e::D.OD Pe:I!lli:
~
X
Se:we::zge P.a...T1i~ipanDn F~ of S1.120 per Equival=nt Dwe1im.:' unit (S~ Page 7 for addirional informarion)
Sewe::- lareral (one required for ea~h builriiT1:' proposed) insciliariOD f~e fo:!" ia1.-~ from m.am to property line:
4-mch: .'>3,015.00 plus $86.00 per iOD! oi chargeable 1::ng1il over 35 i"""
f~inch: S3,148.00 pius 589.80 per fom of chargeable i~~ill. over 35 f~::
Tap:into lO-m::n or iargerma.1n: Acid 536.00 to above f~s:
Tap into m..a.m ov~nme (9) feet iD Q=Pt!:.: Add S1.251.00, pius $36.00 p=r foot oV~r 3:5 fee110 above fees:
Tap.into main lo:a~dm easemem inst=ao of StTeet: .4" iateral- ~317.00;
6" late:-a1- 53:9.00
;;;: ~v..'''- '=' - .,.-"5.5=......... ......- Or,..;~:,..~""" "e 00,.- c:: ] OrOCI .......-- '-0'- O~ ..,...<r-DD---:-:";:-rro"'"" n-::,. ("r'" ..
-'~..... ~.... _.'-..I.............. ~... _-',._'_. ':-'_' .... ~~.. _-..... ""'":=-....
----- -.- - - -
::;-
~ S:-V.':::- ::~~2~.-::::::e::!: :::s=i:: :\~O.
',:2.[ fa:- de::z:i~,"
~ S?:1:J.f \:a.liey S2.lli:::':J:JD. Distri::: ~13CUJ~1 pe= acre (2n~2. to m:lUa.e 'I: of 5ITe~: nm::-of-way alonE: 'DIODem fronI2.g~):
:J MomgomO!}' Sower 5",,-;oe Cnarges (Call ior dotails)
Traffic Sj~aI Fe2s:
):(
/
Most new pro.1e=:rs proposed iD the City aTe subjecT 10 a T;-zffi: Signa} Fee Dzsed OD expected trip generarioD and is ::al=:u1ated
at S13.00 p~ mp. (S~ me s=:hedule of Trip ~nernrioD Fa.-'lDn: on Pages 5 &. 6.)
:J Y 0117 plans cal1 io:- ~g1ng ti:t~ existing fa:iliries OD site. T.D~ rip gen=rario~ :factor ViW be basec. on rile proposed additional
2Ie2..
:J Your plans call ior cn"n~~ me uso oitho existing iacifuy_ Tne 1rip generation iactor will be c:alcu1ated based on me difference
botw= th: existing and proposed uses (NOTE: No refunds will be given II me new use generates iewer nips.)
Q YOU! plans call for replac=m~t of an existing S1I1lctUTe. Tne trip genention factOr will be based OD the estimated increase in
trips (ll any) from the o1d building to tho new. (No refunds will be given iOT lesser sized &==5.)
- , -
DeveJoDmenr Imnact Fee5 rDIFI
-
':-O:..1:'"propos':c pro.I~=: U~ v.:nhu: th~ C)':).'s E2..s1....~ J=:1~:1~ 2.:1:: ~ 5U':1.I'::-: Ie:>IF 10 ::0'\'=:- :';.."t :DS:! O:L-::1PW\'=::-:J':D!5- 0::' ::::-..2
;".)c.:ls ir: th~ Cl':Y 2S: o:1-8[): anc S~t:' Rom= 22.5 2.S foD::n.\'! (ir addJri::>::: 1.[' riJ~ f~=s fo; ~)=?2J).:iuJ.f: Cr:: ii1:j;f:'}~! Sn~\l"r. ~=j['\\)
?rO'1osed T VT'I~ of PrOl':::!
TransDIF
SR j""l':;
Single-family detached (peT EDU) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Smgk-family attached (Duplexes & Condos) (peT EDU)
MuJri-family (Apartments) (peT EDUI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
G=neraJ Comm=iaJ (per acre) ....
lndustriaJ (per acre) ..... . . . . . . . . . .
S=nior Housing (POT EDlJ) .. . . . . . . . . .
2IgD Rise Comm=iaJ (pOT aCTo) ...........
Gol;ColJISe (per a=)
:\'::.:il:aJ C~:::ne:-lP=:- a::rt:)
$ 5.920.00
4,738.00
3.552.00
]48,000.00
. . . . . . . . .. 88.800.00
. . .. 2.368.00
236,800.00
4;~.400_00
3&4.80u.OCI
$ 820.00
. . . . . . . . . .. 656.00
. . . . . . . . .. 492.00
. . . . . . .. 20.500.00
. . . . . . .. ] 6,400.00
. . . . . . . . . .. 656.00
to be &t=ined
10 be d~t~rm.med
10 be ci~termmed
^ ).. OUT proposed project is subje::.t to th= Public Facilities DIF to cover the COSTS of e:hl'anding the City's facilities:
?rrmosed T ~ of Proiect
Total
R=siri~rial (p~r DC) ..
"on-Residential (p=:- acre) .
s: 2.150.00
j 0,'750.00
'- :.:;.z ?;-oposec pro.1e:: IS Jo::arec V.1r:rn.n On:y H.2.n:n Viii.2.g: 1 or 5 1m Peri:srrian Bridge DIF Fee:
:ResIdential Land use (po, ED U)
. . . . . . . . . . .
..........
S545.00
~ }. ou:- proposed proj~=: 15 v."itiriD one or more of me ioliov.'inf O:4ina.ge _or sew~ b2.S:in.s (DIT Fee to be D....""t...."TID.ined :with app1i=ario!l
of Dlllding pe:nn:i1i ---
T olograpb Canyon Dnm::age (p",- a:ro.\ .
-=- ~~=~pb.Ca.nyOD.--..S.=we;, ~]*lIDp':d 'ficm~s1P~ ED~-)
~ e1eg;-apD Canycm Sew=:-.gT2\'i,!:' fjov,"s, (pe; ED'_-
:-c'';;: CaryoL S~v.'=:-. g:-z'.1TY :Jows i-?=:- =.~~-.
........
$4.5~9.00
560.00
"',-",
SaJ, Crook Sew:::. gra\iry flows (p",- EDlTl . . .
........
..::.J~.l):
2$4.00
'You: pro_le:! ID.2}' faD Viiri:ri:r: ZD assessmenT disI:ic! wm::.h hz.s illeady paid me :-equiTed DI? For more iniormat10D regarrimg
Dovejoumen, Impa:I roos. pleaso :OIr".ac1!ba, Se:tion's stBif a' (619) 691-5014 EX!. 3505 or (619) 691-5258.
!\lOTE: -=-6 cn=:k lis1 is b2.Sec solelY or. th~ plms suiJrnitreG and ao~s Doi De:~ssa...-jjy include ail:final requirementS. It:is intended 2S
a way to inform you, as 2: ci=velop~/owncr, oime gmeral requirements and COSts you can expect to encounter as your proje:::t
d""dops. The TeqUir= and f= contained herein are onJy those imposed by the Engineering Division. You should conta:t
the Department ofBuiJrim~ & Housing for information Teg2Tamg additional fees. Please do not besitate to call this department
for furthOT information.
- 4-
_.._.-_._.__......_._..<-~-
\,"[IDCl1L>.R TRIP GE,\'"[R..nO"- TtU>LE 10"'"[-'1'.'" Y TRIPS'
~ [J~ 7:-?-5: Slf:lli1; :::~:-~ 2...~ bz.s::o DC tb:- :::-:? g::D=:atJD~ :a:lO:-::: ~ a:;.:;ord.z.n::: \\1ID S_L,...~V..;G'S .5-,~:- Co..:.;[){ r( /"ci-::::;.:.:',;:; Tr:::..f{i.
GCfJerCIlOr. F.alc..~ Jar :hc 5.:r: .J1Cgu ReglOT. co:mz.m::: b~=m :-D:' f~ ~ ::a..j:ula~c on S13.00 p=;- t:1.;:' g=:1=:-21t:~ p=:- ::.:::_
r ..and Use Ca~l'OT'\!
Service station
With food-man ...................... _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
"'ith food-man and car w.sh ....... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
OJder service station design ....................
Carwash:
Automatic ..................... _ .
S=lf-serve....... .......
........
A uta sales I. c.=G.1~ 6; n~pa.::.'
A uto ~aIT center . . . . .
Bank/Savings & Loan:
Bank (walk-in oIiiy) . . . . . . . . . . . .
Bank (with Drive-up WlDdow) .........
Sav:ings&Joan.. ..........
Church or Synagogu= . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cn~:nschoD] ...... ....... .......
CDmm=iaJ/R...'"taiJ cen= (also smp comm::rciaJ)
C=Imi1y shoppmg c::nreT (30-60 a"'es. JOO1:.-3001:. S1'.) .
~:igbbo:bood shD?Din~ :~nt:::- (<] (I a:-r::s. <1 OOK S.? 'j
.........
.........
. . . . . . . . .
.......
.......
CO:::::iJ.Iil::::-:l21 mons:
Sup~.ket . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CODvemcncem.ari:::i ...,..... .........
DiscOImt chID . . . . . . .
Dis:::mmtstore ............... .........
" .
"==
.......
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Lumb=rstore ....... ..-...
B2rdware or Paint stor~ . . . .
...-.....
. . . . . . . . .
............
........-.
- -----. -~j~ ~ll!S"~~.
Hospit2l:
.......
-.--- ~-
-------~--
~ .
'~..--.".-? '
~-~-"--
~Ul"sing .nom:
lDdus~..zl:
. . . . . . . .
.......
lI1dustrialtBusmess park (Commer::ia1 included) .....................
lnciustrial pzrl: (No comm=r=ial) . . . . .
Inciustrialpiant(mulripJeshifts) ... ........ ..............
l~ufactUringl2.Ss~bly . . . . . . . . . _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Vi~arehousing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Storage ....... _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sci~ce research & ~ve1opm~D.1 ..............
Lodginf::
Bore1 v.'itb COD.VenrioD fa.ciliri:s & resrau..-ant . . . . . _ . . . . . . .
Motd ........................._.............................
.Resorthore] ..................................................
Offices:
Standard commercial offic= building (<100,000 S.F.) ................. 20
Standard commercial Dffic, building (>JOO.OOO S.r.) ................. 17
CO!J>orare office building (singJe user) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. J4
Medicalid=ntaJ building. .......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
. . . . . . . . . . .
- 5 -
Trip G=eration (p::r day) ractOr
(J = triu~ WI I" = n,:,)
] 60 T/Fuding space
]55 T/Fue1:ing sp.co
]50 T/Fue1:ing space
900 TID.)' or 600/acre
JOO T/Still
)[) T/J 000 S,r. or 3CiO:a::re or 60/se!""\']::: srall
20 T/J 000 S.F. or 400:acre or 20iserv;ce stall
J50 T/1000 S.F. or JOOOi.cre
200 T/JOOO S.F. or J500iacre
60 T/JOOO S.F. or 800/.",e
9 T/J 000 S.F. or 40:.cr,
(See "Schools")
40 T/l000 S.P. or400/acre
70 T/J 000 S.F. or 700;a:r<
:~C ,?'] 000 S.? or 2~OCJ'.a:,~
150 TlJOOO S.F. or ~OOO:a::.re
700 T/J 000 S.F. or 700
60 T/J 000 S.F. or 80D.-.:re
60 T/1000 S.F. or 600.-.:ro
6 TI1 000 S1'. or ] OO:.cre
30 TiJ 000 S.F. or J50....:re
60 T/J 000 S.F. or 600iaCTe
40 T/JOOO S.F. or 90'-'::T!;.,
~3e:: or 20'10J=' S.:, or 2[(1'2.:=-=
-
T/3,d
} 6 T.'} 000 S.F. or 200:'2.=-=
.8 TiA= or 90/.CTe
JO TIJ 000 S.F. or ]20i.:re
1/] 000 S.F. or 50."a:ro
TIJ 000 S.r. or 60,"aCTe
T/] 000 or O.2ivauJt or 30iacre
T/1000 S.r. or 80/acre
-4
5
2
E
lOT /Room or 3 DO/acre
9 T/Room or 200/.cre
8 T/Room or ] OO/.cro
TIlOOO S.r. or 300/ac;r'
T/] 000 S.F. or 600/a...,.e
TIl 000 S.r. or ]40/.cre
T/J 000 S.F. or 500/.cre
\'EIDCLE TRIP GE"TR..nO'\ F..CTORS 'Con!'d.1
R::SIO=n:J.z..:.
5iDf-k :z.::n.iiy ri~:a::.t!:::
Condo'Jupkx . . . . . . . . . .
Ap=ts ............ ......... ......
Mobile home, Adults oruy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mobiie home, Family ..............
Rerir"",ont Community . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Congregate Gatt Facili,,' .. .........
Rf:staurantlJ..ounge:
Low turn-OVeT, quali". reStaUTaJJI .........
SJ1-down. high mrnover
F2.S1-foOG with Drive-througb
:251-10J8 v.itboU!. Dri,,~-tl:rrougn
Loung~
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
~ (I T/SlDgl:: i"a=niJy dwellmf:'
E TruDi!
6 T/liDi!
- T/liDit
5 T/Spac~
4 T /liDi!
" T/liDit
.......
.......
100
200
~OQ
75Ci
]00
TIJ 000 S.F. or 3/5eat or 5DO/aCTe
TIJDOO S.F. orl/sea! or nOD/acre
TIJ 000 ST or 23/sea! or 3000/acre
Tn 000 S.F. or 22:sea!
T IJ 000 S.F. of gross floor area
. ..........
...............
Schools:
UDivmi,,' (4-year)
Community college (2-yea:r)
High school . _ _ .
MiddJe/k mgh school. . . . . . . .
El=m~m:z..:-'
.:92Y ::'aTe
.......
.-.....
2.5
..........
1.6
1.4
LO
T/5tudent or 100/acre
T/5tudent or 80/acre
T/5tudent or ]]/] 000 5.F. or SO/acre
T/5tuden! or 40/acre
T/5tudent or ]4/] 000 S.F. 0'. 60/a:re
T/ChiJd or 80/1 000 S.F.
.......
~ .L
5.0
"-mc:
'\:,~~::~ .2..h::::-~:;','~ ';~~::-2t:IDD :a::ro:-s 2.T~ DroyiQ~c. t..i3.a: ".i;=.:: :-:sul~ ::: :::.~ 6gn:T tD7Z1 \'~:i::.i:le mI' gen:raIioTI sIn}; b~ '.lsec
:::; :ompllD.:J.g :.:o~ T :~.:s: Signal Fe~.
DEFERRAL I!\'FOR1I1.I< 110:"
II: a:::::rr-G.z.::J.:= V,~IT S::::rio::: ~=.2':::.G"'70 of th~ C!1!.ll.:: \:-1...:;;::;' h1~:iDal Co=:. 6: 0v.':J=::-'Cl~"::lo~ :DZ~: 2.?:?:y 10::- 2 6:f:::-2.: 0: i..1J: T::=!t::iJ"::::-::::1:
1:-' rr;..s::.i ::l:::- ?:":"J1J::: r.:::::;J::--C)',::::::::::':S. :J~:f=:72.ls wzy~: g:-am::::d ::X- 2..=:,- Q: ~= fo}jo~.;:..-:..::.g =-e:2..S0c:
"
msmliz:cioD of the :impTDVeID~nts would cr""....ate a hazaroous condition.
lm?rcv=m~ntS m.5IaDed a:: me pro.le::i. sitt would De m::::oID?arfDlt v,':ith the present o.evelopme:m 0:;: me aTt2-.
InsuiliariOD of the 1mprOveID~ts woulci he premanrre be:;ause of the existing conditions of tbe surrounding are:a.
h wocid be desirable to have improvemeDts iDstalJed as ar: overaJJ proje::.
_.
4.
(NOTE: De:ferrals may no; he grnnred for T2S0D of:firumcial hardship.)
To apply for 2. deferral you must complete the necessa."'Y form a\'2.i1able at the ETIglneering Dh':isioD counter. Tnt applicatioD mU5~ De
a::cornpaniec by the appli::.anon fee speci.:5eci in the Master Fee 5:ne:iuJe.
If the dciaraJ is granted, a =h bond (US currency or a certified =mer's check) in the amount ofl]O% of the esrimated value of the
work bt:ing deferred must be posted with the City Finance Office.
In certain =::s, the City may ac:ept a lien against the applicant's property in lieu of me cash bond. However, the follov,-ing items must
be submined before the City 'will comider acceptance of a lien:
A le~T from the appli:::.ant fuliy explaining wby there is 2. D~C for a lien iD lieu of the cash bond.
- 6 -
'.--.."......-------.. ._---~ .--'.--
DEFERR.., r'\'FOR"1A 110'\ (C.od,'d I
"
-~ z::,p:-aiszJ o:~~ p;-op:-~. pT~2I~::: 2.!)c. slgn.~d b; 25:2:: 0: C2.l1fo:Tll2 C:-;:}:'i~c .1..pprzlS==- Su:t 2~:1:c.is2] siI.2L !l2.Vt h=~r..
?=-~""':C \.\--:tb..1:: 6~' ::iz;'s O:L~t: d.a!~ Q:-~:- V.71n....~ 7:-qU::S: f0:-:::':- ll:-r.. Price ;2ngt: for 3D app;-:t!sal i~ ::tpprO:J.:im:aIf:'i; S35(1 H
5500 for.lt single f:amiJy bomt And S:.OOO to 5:..500 for commen:ia.J pro;:>err:..
_.
A Tn1= RepOI1 p~an:d by 2. title insuranct company v.ithiD 60 days afthe date of the 'wTineD request. The price range for.a
Title Report is approxim.ateJ~' 5500 to 51.500 for a single famil~' home and 52.000 to 52.500 for commercial property.
PROCEDURE FOR THE INSTAT T AnON OF STREETLIGHTS
if:D~ cn~:21.S: mriJcat~5 ri:1:: ,~qUln:mem 10 msral1 one or more stre::: lIghts, th~ ioliov.mf! steps are required:
1. Tne d::velopcr. his ~~~ or contraCIor applies for a COn.suu=DOD p01Dll from this depanm~m 10 instal] the SIreet light. (Also
see ::necklist for COn51I'1l1:rion Permit requirements on Page] .)
,
Tnt P=nnits Section v.ill check with the Traffic Section to cL""L.'"'I1nine the exacilocarioD of the required street light.
- .
upon providing this lo:arioD 10 tD.f; ~velor:r or his agent me ri~velDper-/a~em COD:a::rs San Diego Gas &. Elecmc to obtaiD tD.=
ri~s:i:-ed se!"\'i::.~ poiD: io::arion.
~.:::.~ :i:veio?::::- 0:- ~s -::::::=- 2~:n: :::::11105: SU.:J=:U: Z ,?l2IL'sl:er::r. SD0't'.1::lf: 2.1: 0: 'L.'-.:= :ioEcrv:mf-
.
Street light Jo::ztion
B. Service poini
C. Condu:it size, rype ana location
D. ?ulJ boxes
_. \\'rr:::- sizes- --
"
Tne T~"1J.c Secrior: reT1ews for approval
- ---
---~
---~._~ -
-~---
-.
?e:;::::::s- Se~oL i.ssue~ -?::::J.i7v,i:b 't"V-'C' ::CI?j:s w 1rs:Je::!lo= S::rio::::.
SE"'ER4.GE PARTICIPATION FEE
The- Cnula VistE. City Coun:-iJ has authorized the colie:tioD of a f~e Ie 2id in the CDS! ofpTo::.essing sewcrage generated iD the city. llliS
fee is D011n2l1y colle::ted at the time of connectioD to the public sewe; Dr when a permit is issued for adciing p1umbing ID..'"tUres m 2.I!
eX1S!JIlg buiidillg. Tne CU.lTen: iee is $2220.00 po: Equivalent DweliirIg unit (EDu), or single family dweliirIg [prorated in the case of
co=ercial projects based on Equivalent Fixmre units (EFU)J. Tne following is to be used as a guide in calculating the fee for your
proposed, however, the fina] charges will be based upon the plans SIJbmitted for a Building P=it:
Residential:
Sing!e Family Dwellings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Multi-Family Units (apa..'1ID::nts. condominimns, mpJexes)
Mobile Home, Trailer ............ . . . . . . . . .
.........
1.00 rou
0.75 rou
0.50 roD
................
........... .....
SEWER.o.CE PARTICJP.o.nO" FEE I('ont.d,:
r::O~"TI:-7":-:2.:
R\.. Pa=i:s
Restaurants:
SmalJ (searing Jess than 100) .. . . . . . . . . . .
Large (searing JOOormore)....... ........
Car wash:
SoJf-serve . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Automatic wi wat=r recycling ............
Automatic w/o 'waC::r recycling t
SeJf-sor\ice Latmdrios:
.......
. . . . . . . 0.5 per hook-up plus Et-us in blogs (set r.abl~ 0:10\1
. - . . . . . - . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . "FU count (see table below)
. . . . . . . . . . . 25 gal/day/seat
. . . . . . . . . . . . 2.0 EDUs peT staJ]
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.5 EDUs
- . . . . . . . - . EFUs case by case
. . 0.5 EDU/washer pll1S EFUs not attached to washo!,
- Fa::iliIl~s u.smg wat:;r [a. processing pUIposes shall be assessed mru\'1ciualiy by tilt Director.
: Faciliri~ with wa1Q""~ycling systems shall be ass~ed individualiy. lniormarioD required for thf: asSessm~nt shalJ be provided by tot
applicant.
Table rOT :::aicu1atin('r EFUs:
F iX'n.!7~
". ........
Eq~
~
:-D:TllT~
EFT;
4
""'" sink (Commo!cizli
32t!ltUD.
=:'=rl~ unit 0:- CUS?iom
5int (wash-up, cin:ular spray)
Sin!: !. W2.51:;-up. eacn set of fau:::ets
:"'::maJ (fjusb I21l1:1
2
='~f IC):.lTIL.2.:'= : ~2:~ De<=.': r
l..a-:.m:::L')' tuD or domes washe: .
J......2\"arory _.'............
l..2'i"atory (D::Dtal! . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SIDk or dishv..asber . .
-
~
~:':-w.ii: {_:)~.J.f:S:2]:
L'r1nal !sI211'! .. . . . . . . . .
urinal (wall) . . . . . ..
Toilct (tani:) ... . . .
Toii::! ('\"2.j,,~)
J(I
5
2
5
-
~
10
ifF l~u1ri?lY-tOw EFUs by-14 GPD ~- Djvid~tl1at DumD~:- by 165 GPD=l EDL S" Mulripjy result by 52.220 10 c:aJ::ulalt 1O~] fee.
---------
~__DDno'\...:.__=___ CO!~1]\.'fT".7S:
Cneck lis! by:
-
-r-" . ('~ \~, \,""'1
~:-\ \=1'"
:J2,e:
! tD.'~j':=--
?ho::!~: (619')
;-.0. ,-_"
('-- ij-J,-'~r""'"
r}J'\H[lII,G:=:t.i:;t>,r;=::::I2'~, .",:!:-!:lr:)"..,.,D.-._"""''''....,__.''''-=..._
-);:
-"~"'-"-""---'" "--_.'--~ ~""- ._-
-_.-- -~ --- --- -
----~---
-
CHULA VISTA POLlCE DEPARTME~T
CRIME PREYE:-ITIO~ l::--TI
PLA.lv REHEW
Date:
January 19,2000
To:
Steve Power, Pl~
Rjchard E Preu~rime Free Multi-Housing
From:
Project:
DRC 00-42, 3733 Main Street
Following co=ents are to assist with the proper utilization of security hardware, alarms (access
control), lighting, and landscaping to reduce criminal activity and to heighten crime prevention
awareness through the concept of "defensible space" and environmental design.
ACCESS C01'iROL
xx Perimeter security
Doors
xx Steel door frames
Solid core doors XX .t..stragals
XX Deadbolts, flushbolts, and electronic locks
T wc.-inch screws for mounting deadbolt lock strike plates
_ Peep Holes on front doors. 180 degree range of view minimum
Glass
Windows must meet AAA1A. FORCED ElvTRY RESISTANCE STANDARDS
_ Sliding glass door(s) must have Track or Channel locks
_ Glazing
E:\.1:enor
XX Security hardware XX Security system(s); camera and special applications
_ Fencing and gates
crIED
CVPDICPC 01/99
.. "-_.._.._.._-_._._-.__._-,_.._-~..,--
....
--.--
..~~. ---
~~ ~~'F'--
CHELA VlSTA POLICE DEPARTMENT
CRNE PRE\T'i'TION U"I,TI
PL4..'Y RH 7EW
SURVEILLANCEIDETECTION
xx Lighting
_ High pressure sodium _ Low pressure sodium
_ Metal Halides _ Break resistamltamper proof fu.:tures
xx Minimum pole height (12 feet) x..,"X Transitionallighting
Placement
x..,"X Landscape application
_ Trees! shrubbery maintained XX Graffiti deterrent
_ Visibility factors, trees cleared up at least six feet, shrubbery trimmed down to three
feet tall
Exterior view fencing
-"----.---.
Wrought iron
Tubular steel
Chain link
x..,"X Security alarm systems
Perimeter
Motion detection XX RobberyiHold up XX Burglary/intrusion
POLICE RESPONSE
:x.:X Addressing _ Access to property
Knox box
XX Visibility; allowing patrol officers to monitor activity
XX Reporting procedures
CI""rcl)
C\ "PDICPl' 08199
.,...~-
1.-
- -
CHl'LA VISTA POLICE DEPARTMENT
CRI:VlE PREYENTION u~IT
PLAN REVIEW
POLICE SERHCES
:\...>; Training of management and empioyees in security procedures and crime prevention
awareness.
xx Security sUIVey preformed by the Crime Prevention Unit.
SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATIONS .~J) COMMENTS
Cri::-!e Prevention Dersonnel aIe av2.i.iable for training regaIding emergency and police reponing
procedures. Scheduling of this training is recommended to coincide with the beginning of regular
operations.
Thank you for the opportunity to have input into the planning process. If you have any questions
or ifl can be offurJler assistance please call me at the Crime Prevention Unit at 691-5127.
C!"TE.D
CVPD'CPL: 01/99
..-..._-~-_.~...,--------_.~_.._~_._-,_.__.. ---
- -----::J .
~
... ~
~~~,
'C/) ~_. -"-.=.""
~-;;..""~"!.:
<, ~(\?,.'
.":9. ',zj~~/
~
December 28, 1999
_ _ _...- ,.~~J -II "y
505 GARAE1""T AvENUE
POST OFFICE SCX 2322
Ci-IUu.. vrSTA, CALIFORNIA 915,2,232=
(619) 420-''''3
=,l..X (619) ~25.;- .:.6S
:-, -:.":::://WW\h', SWee7\\'2: e r.::.":;
G::~HNING 90AR:;
w~
...::~~~
w ::; SKI WO:"'N!:WI:;: :;-':';I;;M';",
M"'-"GARS =,:)OK WE..SH_ VI:E :MAIR
JAMES -JIM" D'JuC
S>J: JARRETT
BUD POCKUNGTON
Gi:;ORGE H. WATERS
CARY F. WRIGHT
WANDA AVERY
Tt:\EASURER
MAArSA FAAPON.FRIEDMAN
SECRETARY
'-
Edali Olivo-Gomez
City of Chula Vista
Planning Department
276 FOUith Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
,
I
J
I
L
P~_:'.:j",,:";:3
Subject: WATER AVAILABILITY
PROPOSED FOOD MART & CAR \J\lASH
3733 MAIN STREET
CASE NO: IS-00-14, DRC-00-.12, PCC-OO-25
SWA Gen. File: Water Availability, ; 999
Dear Ms. Olivo-Gomez:
This letter is in response to notices of an Initial Study, Design Review Application and
Conditional Use Permit Application for the subject project within the Sweetwater
Authority servjce area. There is a 6-inch waler main located on the east side of Mace
Street ana an 8-inch water main located on the north side of Main Street adjacel~t to the
__proposed development. Our -records indicate that there -are--rwo -water serVices to this
property Enclosod is a COD\' or" ~ /4 S:::(' 2" ::: ~-- -~-- -~ov'o "~- -X.ls-I.no \"--"'r
. ......, ,~ I., '-'-". '-'-~.;:I::::....,'~,IC~::'I' \......~:Ic::c: l......vo.........
72cilitjes.
,A, private developer paid for upgrades to the Authority's water sj'stem in 1993. There is
an agreement between Sweetwater Authority and the developer that will require the
owner of this proposed project to pay $2,240.14 to the Authority prior to providing water
service to this parcel.
At this time, we cannot comment on the adequacy of the existing system to provide fire
protection for this project. The Owner must submit a letter to the Authority from the
appropriate fire agency stating fire flow requirements. Based on this requirement, the
Authority will determine if there is a need for new water systems or substantial
alteration to the existing water system. The Authority recommends that your Agency
work with ours to determine if the existing water facilities are adequate to meet the
added demands prior to issuing a building permit.
A Public Water Agency
Sen,ing ]\/ational City, Chula Vista and Surrounding Areas
_^_m__
if
City of Chula Vista
Planning Department
Atm: Ms. Edali Olivo-Gomez
December 28, 1999
Page two
...1J_
- -
If the Owner provides the required tire flow information and enters into an agreement
for water facility improvements with the Authority, water service can be obtained at a
pressure ranging from a maximum of 90 p.s.i. ;0 a minimum of 80 p.s.i.
If you have any questions, please contact Mr. RusseJ/ Collins at 422-8395, ex!. 639.
Very truly yours,
SWEETWATER AUTHORITY
~i 0 ~Ii'o
/~L~?J; i,J:::~c T (
\ : . \
!a~-c I <:::m"t'"
'-' II Ie..... L.......I J ~j,
Chief Engineer
~ 'y -
enclosure: photocopy of 1/4 SEC. 23-8 map
~:\SWA_AD\DATA\eng""poOJ\3733 main. doc
pc: Mr. Robert Faudoa
Gary Engineering-
.1901 Morena Blvd., SuiIe 30L
S;m l)ieCJ" '--;6...22~
~ ':..
',,---- Mr. Steve Power ~
City of Chula Vista
Planning Department
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
...----'----------
-~~
fjOA, r ~'
_ . 0
.,. ~
~- :---~"..~
~.~ Ii:
.
.,,~~.,--4'~~
::Jo1 ,.
,),. --- '"
- . - . ~~ ~.:~ " .
~;:; ~;,..>
t~ -<
:1
~.,
....., "'1
--1--'
,~, .,~
h__..
-
N.:JTL BEFORt
SE! R(IMB'.JR~G TH!~ Ail:U-,.
IN AC:::xJ"'l1NC O(..Ti_AF~r).~ fOOX26
,SUN"'!' II.I;>Y'!"S)
"
~~ .. !:
IN .'
.'
"",'-.. "
.:~,..., ,. - i; t.
~1'~G'Dm. \~O
5:';J" 3;. '" ."' :....! .
._5-:--.392t?,....-, ::;:;
W" ~!
3i...d~.... . . , .
f#t . ".. :. ,:~t ~;
::..,.::; '""
V1 ~,r" ;~~.
__._~.~.~,~~..r~.] ~~ it
.~ <r;:: ~;>-1 ~.
~~ ';<~} ::
15.... /C!; :;
N'" : ~
"
"
"
.:'
"
"
"
.'
"
"
-.
'v1AIN
..
..~
.~
e.337
15' 8- ^C .65
WoO. 9228
: !
-,"-"-
I
1
~
)!t'
s
g
,
~.
N.
'':I'
.~
r-~
cr:N
:::) N
o r:~-.
U ,~
:;OOC25 :"0
"uTO RECYaJNC) ~-- 3i -. ~
~'.~
o . ~
.~~J; !~ .~RlTTO~~ A~~
, . :::.::;:; 'rv''2i~''-
. / ,2:..9::: r:v2.
"fH ."",'T"Z -'-g'::__S~ .'"...~
w 0 =,~>ft-i, ,"""" ::::. '2i.2 c:) iJj
10-CN _ U') C u ........0
1,O~EO -g 2--:5;: .,CL.C-? E
:.::: :::: Q) ..!::) -.,- :...
~ _........ _"':-' -.. 0
~ .-:.;.,::" ,C'J..f::J '".:::
.~ 0 .......:::--:=-.(.."\- ,Q
-< - 0 ~-_r:: "-'
" .2Yuu):::S~
"3:' . ^ ;,;-,~;! :"".;.CJ"':':'" .";:
II:) .. i ::: -- CJ ~- r;- b
~ '1'..
:\i
~
.!.
e.GV :i(
s.rs J88Je M~ J
w.o. ''',~!Ii'"!
. ..,~
t $Ii;'.
5' ;:,~c..J
-< ..#""1
r5 ~~:;;
. ttl~ l
~D.... ~
, .~~!
.
rM.
..-...
'-. '
,
)".q.~
- 4(f USDoENT
(3-SW-B1Q)
~,5?9
~
~
c
<
c
~
~
29008 f'
I- ~
~
(J) :.,
~
y
.
5orsJ~~~~7
w.o. "6B2..1
w
U
<(
2
~.;;,. '" '
,2 .
. 0
---:::~
.
.
N'-
""""',.~
_~~.r,;AB.~*
---.-
PROJECT SJTE
J,5DS8 .
.:w
.,.:...,..>:...J'
c:r::
o
0...
o
.:.~989 ~
6.F"H'78-~
w.o, A2a~.4J--
8:q
~o
~ .......-'")~
.rJ ~~~cj
..., > ",...,'>:o3i
_,__L:: 1'1
i Q i:~
CG"V t ." e" AC .7.... W.O.
_' 120JJ
t 29C23 ;~: orrsn FlT11Nt:
; a:.)~:q-- _~.W 0 AOBO 6
.,'H1975...-'"
\~'O\~~~6\
~~,. \
~\ \ \>~
'"'' ~\
.N
.0"'; ""
""1,&)' "
~:eN~
..,,<en""
... -. <
~~~:
....--...;.-
..-1..:..'.
S'OfrS1:T
0XTlNG\
N=
Q~
~ ~ -<
;:l"-~
.-'")-.o~
I...
. B'GV I
10 d!ORtDt_
. ~........1"7'
. '\.::g:
'. -'''''''''
'\ -,,..,0.....
\,' ;"'_ID
'\ " ;VJ-<~
\. '."~ ".~
'\ .~~
\: NOlL BEFOR~ . .
SEE: REJ~8UR~VlNG TH!S ARE
IN A,C'::OUNTINC D T ACRE.."J.fEN'T
EPT. (SUNNY' ~~
>
o
'"
~
~
~
o
~1'
~
. I
,-,I
,<~e7;-:1'9"'5
"" ".C_ 8~3a
.0
R
:s:::"
c,~ ~c"';~
l'i.O. ;~je C
X.{21 .
Z9C,~
)475e
2"BO
BOARD OF ECUc.o.nOH
LARRY CUNNINGHAM
SHARON GILJtS
PATRICE. A. JUDD
BERTHAJ. L6PEZ
PAIIEIA B. SIIITH
SUPERINTENDENT
llBlAS. GILPiill.
["A ELEMENTARY SCB DL DISTRICT
84 EAST OJ" STREET . CHULA VISTA. CALIFORNIA 91910 . 619425-9600
EACH CHILD IS AN INDIVIDUAL OF GREAT WORTH
(G ~ D
~';7 I",
\!: b
Dece~:Je~ 27, 1999
I r.:::\ =
11))1 ~
li~~'
III,
IU .:
I
I
I
PI 1\ ~.!"I!' '.""'
, '-,.....: ~ T '~.. ! ..:::
_ "J
- -- ~.
Mr. Steve Power
Associate Planner
Gity of Ghu/a Vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Ghula Vista, GA 91910
RE: DRC-00-42/ PCC-OQ-25
Location: 3733 Main Street
3,3521sq Food Mart & Car Wash
Dear Mr. Power:
Thank you for the oDportunity to respond to the Development Processing
Application for the proposed project referenced above. Please be advised that
this oroject is within the Ghula Vista t=:lementary School District. which serves
c:-;ilc,;:;n from Kinoergarten mrough Grade 6. Otay Elementary is the home
school for this projecL
State law currently provides for a developer fee of $.31 for non-residential araa
to be charged. Our portion of the fee is $.14/souare foot to assist in financing
faciiities needed to serve growth. Please nOTe that the fees are due to increase
after tnefirstotlhBCyear: The amount of increase-is unknown at this time.
If 'IoonaVear1y~questionTpTease- give-us-a call.-
---- - ..-- -.--
Sincers!)/,
c/U'-"". -.-- '#~-N ..
~/ ~~ -.
~ - -----7""'"~~_
----.. - --.----- --.-
Lowell Billings, Ed.D././'
Assistant Superintendent
for Business Services & Support
LB:do
co: t=:caiia Olivo-Gomez
.._..m....'___ '."_'___. ,..,._.....____"_".
lRiI
d Ii:
.U'!
I ;/.
c...-/
J
I
I
!
-.., ---". -.--
'HE
TIERJH
CORPORnON
~:)"'--:-It".:..
..""
ueve,::>~",
Camino Del Rio N.
Suite 300
San D'e9:!. Calib~nia
~.SSE-"
.
2"":: -":':'::~:'.
~::1De
1/.:='~,2;J~:7'le~:
(~,~9: f,":i.7E5~
Fa)" (5:9) S':1.78?9
C3mmerc:a.
MDngages
April 20, 2000
City of Chula Vista
Mr. Steve Power, Project Planner
PJanning Department
Public Services Building, ChuJa Vista Civic Center
276 Fourth Avenue
ChuJa Vista, CA 91910
RE: Case Number: DRC-00-42
3733 Main Street, CIuda VlSta, California
D-..ar Mr. Power.
--.-----
. - - - - -
We have owned atJd oPerated Hilltop Main Self Storage located at 3755 Main Street for
-20 years. Dur facility -is rontiguous to the proposed gasstarion.--~-'
Our track record for security is perfect. We have mana sers wno iive on site, they make
this their home, and we feel the use of a 24-hour gas station will hamper the quiet
enjoyment our managers now have, as well as jeOparilize the security of our project and
our customers' goods. _
V>.'hile we feel that development in the area is necessary, we feel that a 24-hour service
station -is Dot the best use.
SF/amh
1(5) It ~ IE n W IE rm
~Ir APR 2 1 2000 I/n,
L I~I
PLMJNIr~G
jO'l
co g
Property ~er
A IT ACHMENT "C"
-.~'---
Mr Steve Power
Planning Department
276 Fourth Ave
Chula Vista, CA 91910
April 28, 2000
Wesley W. Breedlove
Otay Valley R.V. Storage
163 Mace Street
Chula Vista, CA 91911
Case Number: DRC-00-42
Address: 3733 Main Street
Chula Vista, CA 91911
RECEIVED
I
Subject: 24 hour Truck Stop, Car Wash, Mini Mart.
I,. I.. iuUu
PLANNING
Dear Mr Power
In receipt of "Notice of Public Hearing" I would like to bring up a few items that I find
needing to be addressed before okaying the above project.
1) There is no parking aloud on Main Street and this would case the patrons to park on the
side street of Mace when full or waiting for their turn for shopping or service. As seen
before at the "Truck Stop" that was located at the intersections of Hilltop and Orange here
in Chula Vista and again at the Gasffruck stop located at Main Street and 1-805 these
large trucks and cars are forced to wait and or park on the public street to get in, a lot of
the time you will find the trucks parked in the center left turn lanes waiting for their turn
to pull in and thus blocking the lanes for several minutes or longer forcing thru traffic to
slow or stop for them, they would also block the sidewalks with their trailers forcing
pedestrians to walk out into the street to go around and a lot of the time the trailer would
also block part of the traffic lanes forcing thru traffic to merge over to the center lanes to go
around them.
2) The corner of Main Street and Mace Street are blocked several times during the day now
because of the used car dealer and auto repair shops located there. The city put up "Park
Off Pavement" signs on Mace Street because people and employees parking off Main Street
had the intersection blocked and that has helped some and but is not enforced by the
Police or Parking control officer and is still often blocked. I've got Tractor Trailers and cars
parking in front of my business now for most of the day that are not doing business with
~.."_..~._-_.__._-~ -
me but blocking tbe limited parking bere and across tbe street on Britton street. Tbey
unload and park Tractor Trailers for sever days at a time on Britton and tbe west side of
Mace street now and tbe additional traffic and parking would be total cbaos.
3) Main Street is a mess now witb pot boles and broken aspbalt cased by tbe over loaded
and large Tractor Trailers running from tbe sand and gravel pits located at the eastern end
of Main street to tbe Hansen plant located at 7tb Main Street. They always stay in the
center lanes and witb tbe left turn lanes blocked by the additional draw of traffic this will
cause being the only one in the South Bay area trying to inter the new Truck Stop will be a
hazzard to everyone.
4) Tbere are several businesses now that have Tractor Trailers delivering cargo and picking
up cargo here on Mace street and when there are two or more trying to turn left onto Main
Street one has to wait up to ten or more minutes just to get to the intersection and no
traffic can turn on to Mace Street from Main until they move. Sav-on Storage and Truck
Rental's located at 3712 Main Street has a driveway that is offset across from Mace Street
and the left turn lanes are often blocked by trucks or patrons attempting to turn into his lot
from West to East on Main Street and they block the left turn from Mace Street and back
traffic up trying to turn left onto Mace Street from Main Street East to West. Trucks
coming out of the Truck Stop onto Mace Street to turn left or right onto Main Street would
cause a total blockage ofthe intersection and a back up of traffic on Mace Street thus
blocking driveways and entrances to several businesses as well as on Main Street.
d<:nk~2~
wes~ W.-Breedlove
Mr Steve Power
Planning Department
276 Fourth Ave
Chula Vista, CA 91910
April 28, 2000
Wesley W. Breedlove
Otay Valley R. V. Storage
163 Mace Street
Chula Vista, CA 91911
Case Number: DRC-00-42
Address: 3733 Main Street
Chula Vista, CA 91911
RECEIVED
Subject: 24 hour Truck Stop, Car Wash, Mini Mart.
I" L iUUU
PLANNING
Dear Mr Power
In receipt of "Notice of Public Hearing" I would like to bring up a few items that I find
needing to be addressed before okaying the above project.
1) There is no parking aloud on Main Street and this would case the patrons to park on the
side street of Mace when full or waiting for their turn for shopping or service. As seen
before at the "Truck Stop" that was located at the intersections of Hilltop and Orange here
in Chula Vista and again at the GaslTruck stop located at Main Street and 1-805 these
large trucks and cars are forced to wait and or park on the public street to get in, a lot of
the time you will find the trucks parked in the center left turn lanes waiting for their turn
to pull in and thus blocking the lanes for several minutes or longer forcing thru traffic to
slow or stop for them, they would also block the sidewalks with their trailers forcing
pedestrians to walk out into the street to go around and a lot of the time the trailer would
also block part of the traffic lanes forcing thru traffic to merge over to the center lanes to go
around them.
2) The comer of Main Street and Mace Street are blocked several times during the day now
because of the used car dealer and auto repair shops located there. The city put up "Park
Off Pavement" signs on Mace Street because people and employees parking off Main Street
had the intersection blocked and that has helped some and but is not enforced by the
Police or Parking control officer and is still often blocked. I've got Tractor Trailers and cars
parking in front of my business now for most of the day that are Dot doing business with
----_...._~
me but blocking tbe limited parking bere and across tbe street on Britton street. Tbey
unload and park Tractor Trailers for sever days at a time on Britton and tbe west side of
Mace street now and tbe additional traffic and parking would be total cbaos.
3) Main Street is a mess now with pot holes and broken asphalt cased by the over loaded
and large Tractor Trailers running from the sand and gravel pits located at the eastern end
of Main street to the Hansen plant located at 7th Main Street. They always stay in the
center lanes and with the left turn lanes blocked by the additional draw of traffic this wiD
cause being the only one in the South Bay area trying to inter the new Truck Stop wiD be a
hazzard to everyone.
4) Tbere are several businesses now that have Tractor Trailers delivering cargo and picking
up cargo here on Mace street and when there are two or more trying to turn left onto Main
Street one has to wait up to ten or more minutes just to get to the intersection and no
traffic can turn on to Mace Street from Main until they move. Sav-on Storage and Truck
Rental's located at 3712 Main Street has a driveway that is offset across from Mace Street
and the left turn lanes are often blocked by trucks or patrons attempting to turn into his lot
from West to East on Main Street and they block the left turn from Mace Street and back
traffic up trying to turn left onto Mace Street from Main Street East to West. Trucks
coming out of the Truck Stop onto Mace Street to turn left or right onto Main Street would
cause a total blockage ofthe intersection and a back up of traffic on Mace Street thus
blocking driveways and entrances to several businesses as well as on Main Street.
dZnk~2iL
wes~ W.-Breedlove
Mr Steve Power
Planning Department
276 Fourth Ave
Chula Vista, CA 91910
April 28, 2000
Wesley W. Breedlove
Otay Valley R.V. Storage
163 Mace Street
Chula Vista, CA 91911
Case Number: DRC-00-42
Address: 3733 Main Street
Chula Vista, CA 91911
RECEIVED
I.. I:';I."J
Subject: 24 hour Truck Stop, Car Wash, Mini Mart.
PLANNING
Dear Mr Power
In receipt of "Notice of Public Hearing" I would like to bring up a few items that I find
needing to be addressed before okaying the above project.
1) There is no parking aloud on Main Street and this would case the patrons to park on the
side street of Mace when full or waiting for their turn for shopping or service. As seen
before at the "Truck Stop" that was located at the intersections of Hilltop and Orange here
in Chuta Vista and again at the GaslTruck stop located at Main Street and 1-805 these
large trucks and cars are forced to wait and or park on the public street to get in, a lot of
the time you will find the trucks parked in the center left turn lanes waiting for their turn
to pull in and thus blocking the lanes for several minutes or longer forcing thru traffic to
slow or stop for them, they would also block the sidewalks with their trailers forcing
pedestrians to walk out into the street to go around and a lot of the time the trailer would
also block part ofthe traffic lanes (orcing thru traffic to merge over to the center lanes to go
around them.
2) The corner of Main Street and Mace Street are blocked several times during the day now
because of the used car dealer and auto repair shops located there. The city put up "Park
Off Pavement" signs on Mace Street because people and employees parking off Main Street
had the intersection blocked and that has helped some and but is not enforced by the
Police or Parking control officer and is still often blocked. I've got Tractor Trailers and cars
parking in front of my business now for most of the day that are not doing business with
me but blocking the limited parking here and across the street on Britton street. They
unload and park Tractor Trailers for sever days at a time on Britton and the west side of
Mace street now and the additional traffic and parking would be total chaos.
3) Main Street is a mess now with pot holes and broken asphalt cased by the over loaded
and large Tractor Trailers running from the sand and gravel pits located at the eastern end
of Main street to the Hansen plant located at 7th Main Street. They always stay in the
center lanes and with the left turn lanes blocked by the additional draw of traffic this will
cause being the only one in the South Bay area trying to inter the new Truck Stop will be a
hazzard to everyone.
4) There are several businesses now that have Tractor Trailers delivering cargo and picking
up cargo here on Mace street and when there are two or more trying to turn left onto Main
Street one has to wait up to ten or more minutes just to get to the intersection and no
traffic can turn on to Mace Street from Main until they move. Sav-on Storage and Truck
Rental's located at 3712 Main Street has a driveway that is off set across from Mace Street
and the left turn lanes are often blocked by trucks or patrons attempting to turn into his lot
from West to East on Main Street and they block the left turn from Mace Street and back
traffic up trying to turn left onto Mace Street from Main Street East to West. Trucks
coming out ofthe Truck Stop onto Mace Street to turn left or right onto Main Street would
cause a total blockage ofthe intersection and a back up oftraffic on Mace Street thus
blocking driveways and entrances to several businesses as well as on Main Street.
!>>;nk~
wes~ W. Breedlove
-..--. -'--'~--"'-~---'.'----"'----'--'