Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Comm min 1999/04/147:00 p.m. Wednesday, April 14, 1999 MINUTES OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA Council Chambers Public Services Building 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista ROLL CALL/MOTIONS TO EXCUSE: Present: Chair Willett, Commissioners Castaneda, Hall, Ray, Thomas, Tarantino, and O'Neill Absent: None Staff Present: Jim Sandoval, Assistant Director of Planning and Building Rick Rosaler, Principal Planner Rich Whipple, Associate Planner Harold Phelps, Assistant Planner Scott Arsenal, Police Department Ann Moore, Assistant City Attorney Elizabeth Hull, Deputy City Attorney PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/SILENT PRAYER INTRODUCTORY REMARKS: Read into the record by Chair Willett APPROVAL OF MIN UTES: February 24, 1999 and March 10, 1999 MSC (Thomas/O'Neill) (4-0-2-0) to approve minutes of February 24, 1999 as presented. Motion carried. MSC (Castaneda/Ray) (4-0-2-0) to approve minutes of March 10, 1999 as presented. Motion carried. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: No public input. ACTION ITEM: Approval of GMOC Annua~ Report. MSC (O'Neill/Thomas) (4-0-0-3) to approve report as submitted. Motion carried. ACTION ITEM: Change in Planning Commission Regular meeting time. MSC (O'Neill/Thomas) (7-0) approving change in Planning Commission Regular meeting time from 7:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. Motion carried. Planning Commission Minutes - 2 - April 14, 1999 3. PUBLIC HEARING: PCC-99-31/PCM-99-09; Consideration of an amendment to the Rancho del Rey SPA I Commercial District Regulations to consider allowing self-storage facilities subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit and associated permit to allow a self-storage facility to be constructed at 860 Lazo Court in the C-1 Commercial District - Caster Group L.P. MSC (Castaneda/Hall) (7-0) to continue Public Hearing PCC-99-31/PCM-99-09 to April 28, 1999. Motion carried. 4. PUBLIC HEARING: PCC-95-47M; Request to modify the existing conditional use permit as it pertains to the conditions for hours and locations of alcoholic beverage sales at the Universal-Coors Amphitheater - Ogden Entertainment, Inc. Background: Harold Phelps reported that the Planning Commission reviewed this proposal on March 31, 1999 during which a number of concerns were raised. Subsequent to the March 31, 1999 meeting, staff received a letter from the General Manager of the Kobey's Chula Vista Marketplace indicating full support of Ogden Entertainment's proposal to provide a beer garden area for swap meet patrons on weekends. Both Ogden Entertainment and Coors Amphitheater support the requirement to limit access into the Silver Bullet Lounge to minors unless accompanied by parent or legal guardian, as well as the prohibition of minors in the pre-concert exterior beer garden. The beer garden will consist of a temporary patio area behind the sidewalk, separated away from the parking lot. The Police Department has determined that based on the proposed location of the exterior beer garden behind the sidewalk, there would be no violation of the prohibition of alcoholic beverage consumption in public parking lots. In addition, they have determined that an additional ABC license is not required, however, a duplicate license will be needed for the exterior beer garden. Lastly, the Police Department strongly recommends that 2 off-duty officers be stationed at the pre-concert exterior beer garden and would subsequently be stationed at the Silver Bullet Lounge. They do not see a need for off-duty officers at the exterior beer garden during the operation of the Kobey's Open Air Marketplace on weekends and it does not need to be restricted to adults since food and beverages will also be provided to minors. Staff recommendation: That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution PCC-95-47M recommending that the City Council approve the proposed modification in accordance with the findings and subject to the conditions in the Draft Council Resolution. Commission Discussion: Commissioner Tarantino asked if any consideration had been given to restricting selling alcohol at concerts that primarily attract a minors audience. Planning Commission Minutes - 3 - April 14, 1999 Mr. Phelps responded that he was not aware of the applicant's desire to exclude the sale of alcohol during any specific concert or for a particular audience, however, the applicant has indicated that they are not interested in setting up the beer garden for all events. Commissioner Thomas asked for clarification on the requirement to have a private securib/guard during the open-air market, not necessarily an off-duty police officer. Staff responded that a private security guard would be provided, not an off-duty officer. Commissioner Ray stated it is common knowledge that at other venues throughout the county, the prohibition of open containers in public parking lots (i.e. for tailgaters) is not enforced and asked if the City of Chula Vista pro-actively enforces this rule in concert events. Officer Arsenal stated that this is a discretionary matter because if a disruptive incident were to ensue which required an officer's involvement, then this regulation would be strictly enforced. This does not mean that this regulation was never enforced during the last concert season, however, limited manpower resources would preclude the City from taking a pro-active approach in the enforcement of this regulation. Commissioner Castaneda expressed concern with the beer sale at the beer garden starting 3 hours prior to the start of a concert and would favor reducing it to 2 hours prior to concerts. In addition, he would favor any measure, whether it be through signage or wording in the conditions, that beer sale at the open-air market is secondary to the sale of food items and soft drinks. Public Hearing opened 7:30. Teddye Gentry, 5257 Solola Avenue, San Diego, representing the San Diego County Council on Alcohol Policy, stated that SANDCCAP consists of community volunteers that are concerned with policies that promote or encourage youth access to alcohol or pose health and safety risks to the general public and for these reasons opposes this proposal. Oscar Talaro, 527 G Street, Chula Vista, CA stated there are enough outlets within the City that sell alcohol and did not agree with increasing the sale of alcohol at a venue such as this where attendance is high and alcohol impairment poses a public safety risk. Therefore, as a concerned parent and resident of Chula Vista he does not support this proposal. Chris Bitterland, 2245 San Diego Avenue, San Diego, CA representing Universal Concerts Inc. introduced from the audience other representatives from Ogden Entertainment and Coors Amphitheater and stated they were there to answer any question the Commission may have. Mr. Bitterland stated that with respect to concert events that attract a younger audience, it is their policy to strictly enforce the requirement to check I.D.s before selling any alcoholic beverage at any concert event regardless of the audience it attracts. With respect to selling beer at the exterior beer garden 3 hours prior to an event; it is only several times a season that this pre--concert activity will be used for some of the larger shows. The objective is to provide a service and accommodate the fans who are encouraged to come earlier Planning Commission Minutes - 4 - April 14, 1999 to avoid some of the traffic and parking problems that arise with sell-out concerts, and not to simply sit around and drink beer. linda Seufert, representing Ogden Entertainment presented photographs and reviewed the location of the exterior been garden on a site plan. Commissioner Hall asked how the applicant arrived at the 3 hours vs. 2 hours, for the sale of alcohol prior to the start of a concert. Jesse Collier, 30491 Avenida Estrada, Temecula, CA as previously stated it is primarily a matter of providing a service to concert-goers who are encouraged to arrive early at major events, which somewhat ties together with economics. Four hours prior to an event would probably be too early and 2 hours prior would be probably be too late to avoid the traffic and parking congestions. Public Hearing Closed 7:50. Commissioner O'Neill stated he supports the proposal for the following reasons: 1) the Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) and the City of Chula Vista Police Department are satisfied that the proposal addresses any potential concerns they may have had; 2) his observation in other venues like the Del Mar Fair, which is also family-oriented, has been that the beer gardens seems to work well as far as restricting minors from consumption; 3) as a conditional use permit, the City is always able to revisit this project if things aren't working out as it was envisioned; and 4) the applicant's own reputation is what is at stake here, therefore, it is to their best interest to ensure that everything runs smoothly. Commissioner Tarantino stated he does not support the proposal based on a philosophical incompatibility. As an educator who has too often seen the effects of drugs and alcohol in our youth, he does not support any proposal that encourages the sale of alcohol because of the mixed-message it sends our youth. Commissioner Thomas stated that although he also agrees with Commissioner Tarantino's statement on mixed-messages; based on the applicant's integrity and track record in its dealings with the City, he is confident they will ensure that everything runs smoothly and that their desire is to offer the community a top-rated, state-of-the-art entertainment venue. Commissioner Ray stated that as much as he would like to see the VIP Silver Bullet Lounge open to everyone after the end of the concert, he recognizes that this is a privilege that the owners reserve the right to implement, however, he does not agree with the statement in the report that says it would alleviate traffic leaving the concert, because the benefit would be so minimal it would not make any significant impact. He does not support the exterior beer garden having exclusive rights to sell beer outside of the main facility, but yet someone in the parking lot is not able to have a beer to accompany their hamburger because they would be in violation of the open container ordinance. Therefore, he does not support the proposal. Commissioner Hall stated that although he shares some of Cmr. Tarantino's concerns, he is more aligned with Commissioner O'Neill's statement and supports the proposal as presented, however, he made an admonition that this project should be closely monitored to see what, if any, impacts it creates. Planning Commission Minutes - 5 - April 14, 1999 Commissioner Castaneda stated he could support the proposal with modifications. First, the beer garden at the open-air market should be promoted as nothing more than a snack bar that happens to sell beer, not a beer garden. Secondly, the sale of beer 3 hours prior to the event shou[d be reduced to 2 hours. Thirdly, Cmr. Castaneda does not have a concern with minors being allowed to go into the Silver Bullet Lounge accompanied by an adult before and during the concert, however, they should be restricted after the end of the concert. His experience in other venues has been that the atmosphere in these lounges are not appropriate for minors. Public Hearing re-opened Buck Martin, General Manager of Coors Amphitheater responded to Commissioner Castaneda's proposed changes, lie stated that Universal Concert's philosophy is one of providing a service to their customers. The sale of alcohol 3 hours prior to the concert is by no means economically driven, but is driven by a desire to provide a complete service to the customer. Mr. Martin further stated that he has worked in many different venues throughout the United Stated and each jurisdiction has some kind of an open container restriction, however, the enforcement of the restrictions is somewhat gray in all jurisdictions. MSC (Thomas/O'Neill) (4-3-0-0) that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution PCC-95-47M recommending that the City Council approve the proposed modification in accordance with the findings and subject to the conditions in the Draft Council Resolution with the following changes: ao The Open-Air Market M-9 That the wording be changed from "exterior beer garden" to "A snack bar that offers beer shall be restricted to persons age 21 and over unless accompanied by a parent or legal guardian." The Exterior Beer Garden M-6 Add at the end of this condition "and at the end of 3 months, staff will review the merits of maintaining the provision to sell alcohol 3 hours prior to start of a concert vs. 2 hours and will report back to the Commission." Motion carried with Commissioners Castaneda, Ray and Tarantino voting against it. PUBLIC HEARING: PCA-99-01, Consideration of an amendment to Section 19.58.147 of the Municipal Code to revise standards and processing for large family day care homes. - City initiated. Background: Jim Sandoval, Assistant Director of Planning reported that due to changes in federal legislation regarding Welfare reform there is a belief that a demand for day care facilities has risen, therefore, in July 1998 the Economic Development Commission requested that the Planning Department re-evaluate the Large Family Day Care Homes ordinance. Planning Commission Minutes - 6 - April 14, 1999 The San Diego County Child Care Planning Council has identified the City of Chula Vista as a "high needs community" in the South Bay area, and the greatest need identified is care for infants and after school age children. Staff met with Dana Lovelace, a Child Care Advocate with the State of California Department of Social Services and she identified areas where in her opinion current City Ordinance is not in conformance with current State Law. The City's Child Care Commission reviewed the proposal in December 1998 and were supportive of the ordinance changes and recommended staff look into a reduction in fees and streamlining of our current process. The Municipal Code outlines criteria which are based on State law which grants local jurisdiction the ability to improve standards, restrictions and requirements as it relates to: 2. 3. 4. spacing and concentration traffic control parking, and noise control relating to such homes. The following existing areas of the Municipal Code have been identified as not being in compliance with State law. The City cannot require noticing beyond the 100 foot radius. requires noticing of up to 300 foot radius. The City cannot regulate play area square footage or dimensions. The City cannot require a block wall to attenuate noise The current Code It is the State's position that the City cannot impose standards on large family day care facilities that would not normally be imposed upon a typical single family residence. Additionally, the State agency expressed concern with the following: The $3.50 administrative fee that is currently charged is somewhat prohibitive to those who are attempting to establish a day care. That the site plan submittal requirement is too complex The current spacing and distancing requirement is too stringenL Currently spacing between facilities on the same street is 1200 feet and 300 feet if on adjacent streets. The typical spacing requirement for other cities in San Diego County is approximately 500 feet, and The processing time is too time consuming and complex. Staff believes a more efficient method of processing LFDC permits could be accomplished by instituting the following: 1. Coordinate with the State Community Care Licensing agency and Fire Marshal to create forms that are consistent, not duplicative, and easier to fill out. Planning Commission Minutes - ? - April 14, 1999 Current the State Advocate meets twice monthly with potential providers, and a City staff member would be available to attend these meetings as needed to provide and explain the revised handouts, application forms and procedures. Simplify the site plan requirement, and Streamline the process from the current 37 days to approximately 15 days by noticing concurrently with routing to other City departments. There are two areas that, although they are not State requirements the State Advocate has made recommendations on, however, staff does not agree with them. They are: That the spacing requirements be reduced to be more consistent with other jurisdictions in the region. Staff reviewed other communities and the survey indicated a wide range of distance restrictions from no restriction, to 700 feet. In light of recent action to be more stringent with this requirement, staff is not comfortable pursuing this unless specifically directed by the Commission. State law gives local jurisdictions three options for licensing large family day care facilities: a. by right - requires no permit from the City, only the State b. grant a non-discretionary permit - allowing standard-type conditions without the discretion of adding specific conditions to address a problem; and c. a Use Permit - enables the City to add conditions relating to health and safety issues, and also provides noticing to neighbors, which the other two do not. The City currently uses the Use Permit process and staff is recommending that it be continued, implementing new streamlining processes. Staff recommendation: That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution PCA-99-01 recommending the City Council adopt an ordinance to amend the existing large family day care provisions (Section 19,58.147) of the Municipal Code. Commission Discussion: Commissioner Castaneda asked if the $150.00 is an accurate reflection of the processing costs and the City requires proof of certification from the State before a permit is issued. Mr. Sandoval responded that the City does require proof of certification from the State, and the processing cost most likely exceeds $150.00, however, for the better good of the community, the City will absorb the extra cost. Commissioner Ray stated that he would like staff to re-evaluate the fee schedule to be more reflective of what the true processing costs; that the obtaining of a business license be done concurrently with the permit processing; and that the noticing costs be incurred by the applicant. Planning Commission Minutes - 8 - April 14, 1999 Commissioner O'Neill expressed concerns with the disparity in parking restrictions for any home- based business and a large family day care. In addition, he does not support reducing the noticing distance from 300 feet to 100 and asked what recourse the City has to maintain that distance. Mr. Sandoval responded that this is one of the reasons that staff supports continuing the permit process as is because it at least grants the City the ability imposing certain conditions to deal with some of the impacts that could be anticipated. Elizabeth Hull, Assistant City Attorney, stated that the State believes they have pre-empted the City in the noticing distance requirements from 300 feet to 100 feet, however, it is the City Attorney's belief that the language of the statute is ambiguous and it would be a policy decision to challenge the State in this area. Ms. Hull further indicated that parking requirements is within the City's purview and can be addressed through the permit process. Commissioner Thomas supports staff's recommendation to maintain the current Use Permit thereby granting the City the greatest latitude in having some say in the process, and also would support any reasonable measure to challenge the State in its position on the noticing distance. Commissioner Hall stated that his experience having served on the Child Care Commission, is that this is a "hot" topic because there is a need for child care providers. The City needs to make sum it is in compliance with State regulations and cautioned against being too stringent, however, it is good that the City exercise its ability to legally maximize its input, which is through the current permit process. In addition, Cmr. Hall asked if there was any history of complaints from surrounding neighbors. Mr. Sandoval responded that there are presently 23 large family day cares in the community, and after checking with Code Enforcement they have indicated that no complaints have been raised by surrounding neighbors. Public Hearing opened 9:15. No public input. Public Hearing closed 9:15. MSC (Castaneda/Ray) (7-0) that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution PCA-99-01 recommending the City Council adopt an ordinance to amend the existing large family day care provisions (Section 19,58.147) of the Municipal Code with the following recommendations: 1. Add a sentence to Section 19.58.147 of the Municipal Code A. "The City will recover from the applicant cost of mailing notices to properties within 100 feet of the proposed daycare home; 2. Add a condition "1." stating that "a business license will be obtained concurrently with the use permit"; and 3. Add a condition "J." stating that "at City's discretion, an annual review of the permit may be done." Motion carried. Planning Commission Minutes - 9 - April 14, 1999 6. PUBLIC HEARING: PCS-99-03; Tentative Subdivision Map for the Eastlake Trails, Chula Vista Tract 99-04, involving 843 single family lots, four residential super lots with capacity for 300 dwelling units, 3 open space lots, a school and community purpose lots on 332.8 acres located on the east side of Hunte Parkway between Otay Lakes Road and Olympic Parkway. The Eastlake Company. Staff is recommending that this item be continued to April 28, 1999. MSC (Tarantino/Ray) to continue public hearing to April 28, 1999. Motion carried. 7. PUBLIC HEARING: PCS-96-O4A; Tentative Subdivision Map revision subdividing Phase Seven (Purple Phase) in Village One of Otay Ranch, Sectional Planning Area (SPA One) into 447 lots; and amending the Otay Ranch Phase Two Resource Management Plan. The Otay Ranch Company. Background: Rich Whipple, Assistant Planner, reported that The Otay Ranch Company is proposing to revise a portion of the tentative subdivision map in SPA One to implement the recent amendment to the Village One Core area Phase Seven and to amend the Otay Ranch Phase Two RMP. The SPA One Plan, approved in June 1996, required 1,566 multi-family units in the Village One Core, which was based on the Medium High designation of the GDP designation of 18 units per acre. The GDP was recently amended to allow flexibility in the number of multi-family units provided that sufficient multifamily densities were approved to support the light trail transit line on East Palomar Street. The recent SPA One amendment approved 1,512 dwelling units, however, the proposed tentative map utilizes 1,202 units. Phase Seven is also modified to reflect the MSCP agreement between the applicant and the resource agencies. The revised tentative map includes an expanded development area to the south towards Poggi Canyon, and redesigns residential neighborhoods surrounding the Village One Core. Phase Seven is located south of East Palomar Street, west of Santa Alicia Avenue, east of Paseo Ranchero and north of Poggi Canyon. The proposed application subdivides 153.7 acres of land into a total 447 lots utilized for mixed- use development including single and multi family, commercial, community purpose facility, park lands and open space land uses. The Village Core "Main Street" theme is now implemented along East Palomar Street with diagonal parking fronting the commercial/mixed use area across from the 11-acre Heritage Park. Planning Commission Minutes - 10 - April 14, 1999 Vehicular access into Phase Seven will primarily be served by Santa Helena, and Santa Andrea and Santa Alicia off of east Palomar Street. Santa Andrea will be used as a public street to access the Village Core. Fieldbrook Street and Weaverville Street are proposed to provide access to East Palomar Street to allow emergency vehicles access to isolated cul-de-sacs in neighborhood R-18 and R-48. Staff also recommends the connection of Montera Street and Carnero Street at the northern end of the cul-de-sacs and allow the applicant to utilize the smaller modified cul-de-sac design at the end of those streets. In the current design, the length of the cul-de-sac prohibits sufficient emergency response times, proper fire suppression operations and multiple points of access for the Police and Fire Departments. In addition, the current design of the cul-de-sacs conflict with the Otay Ranch GDP goal for providing alternative points of access to residential streets and staff recommends these connections to satisfy the concerns of the Police and Fire Departments and provide multiple points of access. Secondary access to the Village One Core will be provided on the south side of Phase Seven from Olympic Parkwayand will bedesigned to accommodate emergency vehicles. This access road is proposed to connect Fieldbrook Street and will serve as a connection to the regional trail located on the northern Poggi Canyon slope. Rick Rosaler, Principal Planner, reported that the recently approved SPA One Plan amendment reflects the land use changes in the Village One - Phase Seven and adds the Village One West area into the SPA One area. The SPA One Plan amendment and tentative map implement the Otay Ranch GDP amendments approved by Council in November 1998. The GDP amendment reflects land use changes that were contained in the tentative MSCP agreement between the applicant and the resource agencies, they are: The resource agency agreed to authorize the disturbance of sensitive habitat in the Poggi Canyon area in exchange for preservation of land within Village 13 and 15. The Preserve Map would be amended to reflect these changes by adding portions of Village 13 and 15 to the Preserve and deleting the Poggi Canyon area from the Preserve, It is proposed that a revised ownership map be included in the Phase 2 RMP to reflect current ownership patterns, the resource agency agreed that the applicant need not restore Coastal Sage Scrub as initially required by the GDP and RMP. However, ranch-wide resolution of the CSS restoration requirement awaits finalization of the MSCP between the City and Resource agencies, the resource agency agreed that the applicant may disturb up to 25 acres of Maritime Succulent Scrub before the GDP/RMP's requirement for MSS restoration is triggered. The grazing of the cattle on the ranch needed to be updated to reflect some concerns by the Wildlife Agency Planning Commission Minutes - 11 - April 14, 1999 The MSCP agreement permitted development within the Poggi Canyon areas and deleted development from portions of Villages 13 and 15. The proposed amendment modifies the slope calculations for these Villages to reflect the agreement and the GDP amendment recently enacted incorporating the agreement. The specific analysis relative to slope impacts and SPA One is deleted because it is outdated. Commission Discussion: Commissioner Ray expressed concern with the street widths as pointed out in the Fire Marshal's memo to the Plannning Commission and asked why not design the streets wider to allow the fire trucks to go through. Rick Rosaler stated that the Fire Department did a trial run to see if the street width was adequate and it was determined that the streets work and there is sufficient turn around space in the cul~e- sacs. The City in its adoption of the GDP saw narrow streets as a pedestrian-oriented feature. What we found is that even with normal size streets, once the first fire engine lays its line, the second engine will not roll over that line, so we feel that alternative access to the streets are necessary and is why the emergency accesses are proposed at the end of the cul-de-sacs. Mr. Rosaler indicated that going back to wider streets, in his opinion, would be a step backward and would be a major change in philosophy for the Ranch, which is suppose to be pedestrian- oriented. Furthermore, the design speed for a 36 ft wide street is 35 mph, and the design speed on a 32 ff wide street is 25 mph. Commissioner O'Neill stated that in his opinion, the narrower-type street is a better blend with the alley4ype housing, and does not feel that narrower streets slow down vehicular traffic; to the contrary, they can potentially pose a greater safety risk with children darting out from between cars and not having the extra 2 or 3 feet buffer which allows the driver a fractional response time to react. Public hearing opened 10:10 Kent Aden, 350 West Ash Street, San Diego, applicant, stated proudly that much of the vision for the Ranch is now on the ground and is exceeding our expectations. Otay Ranch has signed an Olympic Parkway agreement that will shortly be going to Council whereby they are committing themselves in excess of $30 million dollars to build Olympic Parkway. Mr. Aden further stated that the Village Core is a key concept for Otay Ranch and the changes that are before the Commission tonight greatly increase the viability of the core and commercial area Otay Ranch is committed to providing fire and police access to the project; we have added over 4 emergency access points to this project, we have cooperated and suggested that the fire department drive out to the site and we are also still committed to the concepts in the GDP. Planning Commission Minutes - 12 - April 14, 1999 The narrower streets are a key concept of the plan, and for the benefit of the new commissioners, Mr. Aden clarified that narrower streets do not mean that we put less land into the streets; the same exact right-of-way as other streets in the city is provided. What we did was take 4 feet of paving and put it in the parkway instead, pulled the sidewalks back from the streets to create a more positive pedestrian experience and bring that landscaping along the edge of the street. Mr. Aden expressed a desire to do a workshop on pedestrian-oriented developments utilizing narrow streets. Public Hearing closed 10:20. MSC (Ray/Thomas) (7-0-) that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution PCS-96-O4A recommending that the City Council approve Tentative Subdivision Map (PCS-96-04A) and resolution PCM-95-01C recommending the City Council approve the amendment to the Otay Ranch Phase Two RMP and that staff clarify and address the concerns raised by the Fire Marshall with regard to street width and the connection of Montera Street and Carneros Street as emergency access points. Motion carried. DIRECTORS REPORT: Jim Sandoval, Assistant Director of Planning reviewed the items that are tentatively schedule for upcoming meetings, they are: A workshop on May 19th regarding SANDAG's 2020 Regional Growth estimates A workshop on June 16 regarding economic development COMMISSIONERS COMMENTS: ADJOURNMENT at 10:30 p.m. to the Planning Commission meeting of April 28, 1999. Diana Vargas, Secretary to Plar~ing Commission