HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 3 - Staff Report - Food Trucks
Item: __3___
Meeting Date: 11/08/17
ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING: Consideration of amendments to the Chula Vista
Municipal Code (CVMC) to: 1) add Section 19.58.440 (Mobile Food
Facilities); and 2) amend Chapters 8.20 (Food Vendors) and 5.62
(Vending Vehicles).
Resolution of the City of Chula Vista Planning Commission
recommending that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista adopt an
ordinance amending the Chula Vista Municipal Code by adding Section
19.58.440, (Mobile Food Facilities); amending Title 8.20 (Food Vendors);
and amending Title 5.62 (Vending Vehicles)
SUBMITTED BY: Michael W. Walker, Senior Planner
REVIEWED BY: Kelly Broughton, Director of Development Services
INTRODUCTION
The item for consideration is to amend various sections of the Chula Vista Municipal Code
(CVMC), by adding a new mobile food facility ordinance to Chapter 19.58 (Uses), specifically
Section 19.58.440, and amending Chapters 8.20 and 5.62 regarding food vending and vending
vehicles respectively. Mobile food facilities typically include food trucks, trailers and pop-ups.
The City is experiencing a surge of mobile food facilities that operate on public and private
property without regulatory standards. Staff identified the need for a new mobile food facility
ordinance as there currently are no land use regulations for operating these facilities. The City
recognizes that these facilities provide diverse dining options for the general public, and an
opportunity for entrepreneurs to operate small businesses.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The Director of Development Services reviewed the proposed legislative action for compliance
with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and determined that the action is not a
Section 15060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines the action is not subject to CEQA. In
addition, notwithstanding the foregoing, the Director of Development Services has also
determined that the action qualifies for an Exemption pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the
State CEQA Guidelines. Therefore, no further environmental review is required.
RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council adoption of the proposed CVMC
amendments.
PC Resolution MPA17-0009
November 8, 2017
Page -2-
DISCUSSION
CVMC Section 19.58.440 (Mobile Food Facilities):
Mobile food facilities benefit the community by providing gourmet and fast food services. They
also provide an entrepreneurial opportunity for small businesses to operate in the City, and for
brick-and-mortar restaurants to operate in different locations or markets. When operated at the
invitation of a brewery or retail center, mobile food facilities draw customers that benefit these
businesses. Similarly, when operated as part of a permitted special event, these facilities draw
customers that benefit such events. To facilitate mobile food facility commerce, the City needs
to protect the public by ensuring these facilities operate in a safe manner and do not create
nuisances or hazards.
The City's zoning code provides a regulatory process for pushcarts on private property and in the
public right-of-way, but currently does not regulate mobile food facility vending on public or
private property. The proposed ordinance will create a new section, CVMC Section 19.58.440,
to address these uses on public and private property. The proposed code amendments are
intended to differentiate between the City's mobile food/beverage vending regulations that limit
the sale or distribution of merchandise, and services from vehicles which dispense freshly
prepared and pre-packaged food and beverages, and mobile food facilities by creating new
zoning regulations and processes for permit approval that accommodate mobile food facility
activity in the City.
Reasonable regulations are necessary to ensure that mobile food facilities operate in accordance
with health, safety and traffic laws of the state and the City of Chula Vista parking
requirements; do not cause public safety problems by contributing to traffic congestion or by
creating pedestrian and vehicular conflicts; and do not disturb the quiet use and peaceful
enjoyment of residential neighborhoods. Therefore, the regulations described in the attached
Resolution are in accordance with the authority granted in Section 22455 of the California
Vehicle Code, which allows the driver of any commercial vehicle engaged in vending upon a
street to vend products on a street in a residential zone and lawfully parking adjacent to the curb.
A local authority may also adopt additional requirements for public safety by regulating the type
of vending and the time, place, and manner of vending from vehicles upon any street.
Additionally, California Health and Safety Code section 114315 allows a mobile food facility to
operate within 200 feet of an approved and readily available toilet, and handwashing facility to
ensure that restroom facilities are available to facility employees when the mobile food facility
conducts business for more than a one-hour period.
These new amendments will require mobile food facilities to obtain a vending permit through a
ministerial process that includes securing a business license, as required in CVMC Section 5.62,
obtain permission from a property owner, and possess a County health permit among other
requirements. These amendments will also require a property owner who would like to have
mobile food facilities to obtain a Hosting Permit. Mobile food facilities that vend in the public
right-of-way are governed by the California Vehicle Code and by new CVMC Section 19.58.440
that regulates the time, place, and manner to protect public health and safety. Listed below are
key features of the new ordinance:
Vending and Host permits are required and renewed annually; and
Commissary agreement requirement; and
PC Resolution MPA17-0009
November 8, 2017
Page -3-
County Health permit requirement; and
Limited outside furniture; and
Business license requirement; and
Compliance with performance standards; and
Not permitted on vacant lots; and
Property owner permission requirement; and
Must be an accessory use to a primary use; and
Waste receptacle requirement; and
Existing restroom facility for vending employees.
Permit process:
Mobile food facility vendors would be required to maintain a Vending Permit, and a City of
Chula Vista business license. Property owners who host a mobile food facility would be
required to obtain a Host Permit to allow a mobile food facility on their property. Host Permits
would not be required for public special events, private event catering, active construction sites,
or institutions such as schools, religious, college or hospitals. The application packet submittal
requirements would include: the application form; site plan; proof of a County Health permit;
proof of a commissary agreement, Indemnification Agreement and a fee (Attachment 4).
Vending and host permits would be processed as a ministerial action and expire annually.
Enforcement:
While enforcement of mobile food facility regulations is expected to be more challenging than
typical enforcement for violations at fixed locations; violators will be subject to enforcement
action by the Code Enforcement Division; the Police Department; the County of San Diego, for
health permit violations; and potentially be subject to fines and permit revocation procedures.
Mobile food facility vendors are required to park, and service their vehicles at the commissary
location in the agreement that is submitted with the vending permit application.
CVMC Section 5.62.030
The proposal also includes the creation of CVMC Section 5.62.030, to establish that a mobile
food facility is not a vending vehicle for purposes of Chapter 5.62. Vending vehicles are
typically vehicles like ice cream trucks that operate in a much different manner than mobile food
facilities. Mobile food facilities are defined in the added Section 19.58.440 (Attachments 2/3).
CVMC Chapter 8.20
The proposal also includes the addition of CVMC Section 8.20.015 to establish that a mobile
food facility is not a vending vehicle for purposes of Chapter 8.20. Again, typical vending
vehicles like ice cream trucks operate in a different manner. Mobile food facilities are defined in
the added Section 19.58.440. The other Chapter 8.20 amendments are to vending vehicles, other
than mobile food facilities, and vending machines (Attachments 2/3).
CVMC Section 10.52.200
The proposal also includes an amendment to CVMC Section 10.52.200 to establish that a mobile
food facility is not subject to time limit provision of this section as defined in the added Section
19.58.440 (Attachments 2/3).
PC Resolution MPA17-0009
November 8, 2017
Page -4-
Public Outreach
Staff worked with San Diego United Food Truck Association and California Restaurant
Association representatives to address their interests and obtain input. Staff prepared two
ordinances, Ordinance A (staff recommended) and Ordinance B, an alternative that includes
certain requests from these associations. Staff also presented the draft ordinances to the
Development Services Citizen Oversight Committee; following discussion and review, the
Committee recommended adoption of the ordinance recommended by staff.
DECISION-MAKER CONFLICTS
Staff has reviewed the decision contemplated by this action and has determined that it is not site-
specific and consequently, the 500-foot rule found in California Code of Regulations Title 2,
section 18702.2(a)(11), is not applicable to this decision for purposes of determining a
disqualifying real property-related financial conflict of interest under the Political Reform Act
(Cal. Gov't Code § 87100, et seq.). Staff is not independently aware, and has not been informed
by any Planning Commissioner of any other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision maker
conflict of interest in this matter.
CONCLUSION
The proposed new mobile food facility ordinance provides regulations and a permitting process
for the fair, equitable, and safe operation of these facilities on private and public property while
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with the proposed amendments
Attachments
1. Resolution
2. Proposed Ordinance A (Staff recommended)
3. Proposed Ordinance B
4. Indemnification Agreement