Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda Packet 2017_09_12
City of Chula Vista Staff Report File#:17-0372, Item#: A. OATHS OF OFFICE ·Anna Cabral, Housing Advisory Commission ·Cory Fish, Civil Service Commission ·Edgar Hopida, Charter Review Commission ·Alexandra Mares, International Friendship Commission ·Tina Matthias, Sustainability Commission ·Christianne Penunuri, Cultural Arts Commission City of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 14 City of Chula Vista Staff Report File#:17-0375, Item#: B. PRESENTATION OF A PROCLAMATION TO CHULA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SUPERINTENDENT DR. FRANCISCO ESCOBEDO, ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT MATTHEW TESSIER, AND SWEETWATER UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT DR. KAREN JANNEY, PROCLAIMING SEPTEMBER 2017 AS CHILDHOOD OBESITY AWARENESS MONTH IN CHULA VISTA AND COMMENDING BOTH DISTRICTS FOR THEIR CONTINUED WORK TO PROMOTE CHILDHOOD WELLNESS City of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 15 City of Chula Vista Staff Report File#:17-0289, Item#: C. PRESENTATION BY ANTHONY KLEPPE, REGION 9 LAND PORT OF ENTRY PROGRAM MANAGER, ON THE CLOSURE OF SOUTHBOUND INTERSTATE 5 FROM SR-905 TO THE U.S./MEXICO BORDER FOR THE I-5 REALIGNMENT PROJECT AT THE SAN YSIDRO PORT OF ENTRY ON SEPTEMBER 23 - THROUGH SEPTEMBER 25, 2017 City of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 16 City of Chula Vista Staff Report File#:17-0343, Item#: D. PRESENTATION BY SDG&E OF THE POWER YOUR DRIVE ELECTRIC VEHICLE (EV) CHARGER PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION AT THREE MUNICIPAL LOCATIONS IN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA City of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 17 City of Chula Vista Staff Report File#:17-0369, Item#: 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of June 28, and July 11, 2017. RECOMMENDED ACTION Council approve the minutes. City of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 18 City of Chula Vista Meeting Minutes - Draft 5:00 PM City Hall - Executive Conference Room 276 4th Avenue, Building A Chula Vista, CA 91910 Wednesday, June 28, 2017 SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL CALL TO ORDER A special meeting of the City Council of the City of Chula Vista was called to order at 5:05 p.m. in the Executive Conference Room, located in City Hall, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, California. ROLL CALL: Present:Deputy Mayor McCann, Councilmember Padilla and Mayor Casillas Salas Excused:Councilmember Aguilar and Councilmember Diaz Also Present: Deputy City Attorney Trujillo and Acting City Clerk Bigelow ACTION ITEMS 1.17-0283 INTERVIEWS AND CONSIDERATION OF APPOINTMENT TO THE PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION On June 13, 2017, the following individuals received two or more nominations to be interviewed for the vacant seat on the Parks & Recreation Commission: David Ayala, Eric Chaisongkram, David Olivera, and John Zarem. Mark Twohey, Chula Vista resident, representing the Chula Vista Youth Sports Council, expressed concern about applicants for the Parks and Recreation Commission who represented outside sports organizations. The Council discussed questions that would be asked of each candidate for the Parks and Recreation interviews. Acting City Clerk Bigelow provided information on the item. The Council conducted interviews for the Parks and Recreation Commission. Mark Twohey, Chula Vista resident, representing the Chula Vista Youth Sports Council, spoke regarding the Youth Sports Council's partnership with the Recreation Department and its efforts to assist in maintaining parks. A motion was made by Mayor Casillas Salas, seconded by Deputy Mayor McCann, that John Zarem be appointed to the Parks and Recreation Commission. The motion carried by the following vote: ACTION: Yes:McCann, Padilla and Casillas Salas3 - No:0 Abstain:0 Page 1City of Chula Vista 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 19 June 28, 2017City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft Mayor Casillas Salas recessed the meeting at 5:39 p.m. The Council reconvened at 6:00 p.m., with Councilmember Padilla, Deputy Mayor McCann and Mayor Casillas Salas present. 2.17-0284 INTERVIEWS AND CONSIDERATION OF APPOINTMENTS TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION (DESIGN REPRESENTATIVE SEAT & AT-LARGE SEAT) On June 13, 2017, the following individuals received two or more nominations to be interviewed for the following vacancies on the Planning Commission: - Design Representative seat: Krista Burroughs, Jon Milburn, David Potter, and Joseph Quinlivan. - At-Large seat: Krista Burroughs, Rodney Caudillo, Joe Garbanzos, David Potter, Joseph Quinlivan, Jerome Torres, Jim Trotter, Monika Tuncbilek. The Council discussed questions that would be asked of each candidate for the Planning Commission interviews. Acting City Clerk Bigelow provided information on the item and stated that there were no members of the public present to speak prior to the interviews. The Council conducted interviews for the Planning Commission. Mayor Casillas Salas recessed the meeting at 6:27 p.m. The Council reconvened at 6:32 p.m., with Councilmember Padilla, Deputy Mayor McCann and Mayor Casillas Salas present. The interviews continued. Mayor Casillas Salas recessed the meeting at 7:30 p.m. The Council reconvened at 7:36 p.m., with Councilmember Padilla, Deputy Mayor McCann and Mayor Casillas Salas present. The interviews continued. Acting City Clerk Bigelow announced that there were no members of the public present to speak at the conclusion of the scheduled interviews. A motion was made by Mayor Casillas Salas, seconded by Deputy Mayor McCann, that Krista Burroughs be appointed to the Planning Commission, At-Large seat. The motion carried by the following vote: ACTION: Yes:McCann, Padilla and Casillas Salas3 - No:0 Abstain:0 A motion was made by Deputy Mayor McCann, seconded by Mayor Casillas Salas, that John Milburn be appointed to the Planning Commission, Design Representative seat. The motion carried by the following vote: ACTION: Yes:McCann, Padilla and Casillas Salas3 - No:0 Abstain:0 Page 2City of Chula Vista 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 20 June 28, 2017City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft Mayor Casillas Salas recessed the meeting at 8:07 p.m. The Council reconvened at 8:10 p.m., with Councilmember Padilla, Deputy Mayor McCann and Mayor Casillas Salas present. 3.17-0252 INTERVIEWS AND CONSIDERATION OF REAPPOINTMENTS TO THE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, CULTURAL ARTS COMMISSION, GROWTH MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT COMMISSION, AND PLANNING COMMISSION The following incumbents, whose terms expire on June 30, 2017, will be interviewed and considered for reappointment: - Jennifer Carbuccia, Civil Service Commission - Rodney Caudillo, Growth Management Oversight Comm. - Gloria Juarez, Growth Management Oversight Comm. - Javier Nava, Planning Commission - Jennifer Rodriguez, Cultural Arts Commission The City Council may also consider recommendations or feedback from commissioners regarding their respective commission. The Council conducted interviews for the reappointments. A motion was made by Mayor Casillas Salas, seconded by Deputy Mayor McCann, that Gloria Juarez be reappointed to the Growth Management Oversight Commission. The motion carried by the following vote: ACTION: Yes:McCann, Padilla and Casillas Salas3 - No:0 Abstain:0 A motion was made by Deputy Mayor McCann, seconded by Mayor Casillas Salas, that Rodney Caudillo be reappointed to the Growth Management Oversight Commission, contingent on his successful completion of AB1234 Ethics Training within 30 days. The motion carried by the following vote: ACTION: Yes:McCann, Padilla and Casillas Salas3 - No:0 Abstain:0 A motion was made by Councilmember Padilla, seconded by Deputy Mayor McCann, that Jennifer Carbuccia be reappointed to the Civil Service Commission. The motion carried by the following vote: ACTION: Yes:McCann, Padilla and Casillas Salas3 - No:0 Abstain:0 A motion was made by Deputy Mayor McCann, seconded by Councilmember Padilla, that Javier Nava be reappointed to the Planning Commission. The motion carried by the following vote: ACTION: Yes:McCann, Padilla and Casillas Salas3 - No:0 Abstain:0 Page 3City of Chula Vista 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 21 June 28, 2017City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft A motion was made by Deputy Mayor McCann, seconded by Councilmember Padilla, that Jennifer Rodriguez be reappointed to the Cultural Arts Commission. The motion carried by the following vote: ACTION: Yes:McCann, Padilla and Casillas Salas3 - No:0 Abstain:0 ADJOURNMENT At 8:45 p.m., the meeting was adjourned to the Regular City Council Meeting on July 11, 2017, at 5:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers. _______________________________ Kerry K. Bigelow, Acting City Clerk Page 4City of Chula Vista 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 22 City of Chula Vista Meeting Minutes - Draft 5:00 PM Council Chambers 276 4th Avenue, Building A Chula Vista, CA 91910 Teleconferencing location: Club Intra West, Room 20-1 1 Willow Ridge, Palm Desert, CA 92260 Tuesday, July 11, 2017 REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL CALL TO ORDER A Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Chula Vista was called to order at 5:20 p.m. in the Council Chambers, located in City Hall, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula vista, California. ROLL CALL: Present:Councilmember Diaz, Deputy Mayor McCann, Councilmember Padilla and Mayor Casillas Salas Excused:Councilmember Aguilar Also Present: City Manager Halbert, City Attorney Googins, Acting City Clerk Bigelow, and Deputy City Clerk Kansas Acting City Clerk Bigelow announced that Councilmember Diaz was participating via videoconference from the following location: Club Intra West, Room 20-1, 1 Willow Ridge, Palm Desert, CA 92260; and that all votes would be taken by roll call. Councilmember Diaz stated he complied with all requirements of the Brown Act, including posting the agenda and assuring public accessibility to the location. He stated no members of the public were present at his location. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG AND MOMENT OF SILENCE Deputy Mayor McCann led the Pledge of Allegiance. SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY A.17-0294 OATHS OF OFFICE Krista Burroughs, Planning Commission Lorise Maynard, Cultural Arts Commission Jon Milburn, Planning Commission John Zarem, Parks & Recreation Commission Acting City Clerk Bigelow administered the oaths of office to Commissioners Burroughs, Maynard, Milburn and Zarem, and Deputy Mayor McCann presented them with certificates of appointment. Page 1City of Chula Vista 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 23 July 11, 2017City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft B.17-0262 PRESENTATION OF A PROCLAMATION TO RECREATION DIRECTOR KRISTI MCCLURE HUCKABY AND PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR RICHARD HOPKINS PROCLAIMING JULY 2017 AS PARKS AND RECREATION MONTH Mayor Casillas Salas read the proclamation and Councilmember Padilla presented it to Recreation Director McClure Huckaby and Public Works Director Hopkins. C.17-0295 PRESENTATION BY CULTURAL ARTS MANAGER LYNNETTE TESSITORE OF JAZZ ON THIRD MUSIC FOR A CAUSE, AN EVENT-BASED CHARITY BENEFITING THE COMMUNITY OF CHULA VISTA Cultural Arts Manager Tessitore made a presentation on the item. Karen Roque and Rosa Vasquez spoke on the item. D.17-0299 PRESENTATION OF A PROCLAMATION TO ENCORE ORGANIZATION PROJECT COORDINATOR AIREEN NAVARRO KHAUV PROCLAIMING THURSDAY, JULY 13, 2017 AS SUMMER LEARNING DAY Mayor Casillas Salas read the proclamation and Deputy Mayor McCann presented it to Aireen Navarro Khauv. CONSENT CALENDAR (Items 1 - 9.5) 1.17-0301 APPROVAL OF MINUTES of May 9, 2017. Recommended Action: Council approve the minutes. 2.17-0293 WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS A. Memorandum from Councilmember Diaz requesting an excused absence from the June 28, 2017 special city council meeting. B. Memorandum from Councilmember Aguilar requesting excused absences from the June 20, and June 28, 2017 council meetings. Recommended Action: Council excuse the absences. 3.17-0280 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 2.05.010 RELATING TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF UNCLASSIFIED POSITIONS TO ADD CONSTITUENT SERVICES REPRESENTATIVE (SECOND READING AND ADOPTION) (4/5THS VOTE REQUIRED) Recommended Action: Council adopt the ordinance. Page 2City of Chula Vista 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 24 July 11, 2017City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft 4.17-0199 RESOLUTION NO. 2017-123 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA (1) APPROVING THE 2017/2018 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN FOR THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT (HUD) COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG), HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP (HOME), AND THE EMERGENCY SOLUTIONS GRANT (ESG) PROGRAMS; (2) AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE AGREEMENTS FOR THE MANAGEMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF ELIGIBLE PROJECTS WITH EACH SUBRECIPIENT IDENTIFIED IN THE ACTION PLAN; (3) AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR TO ENTER INTO A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE RECREATION AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENTS FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF FOUR CDBG-FUNDED PROJECTS; (4) AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE ANY AND ALL HUD DOCUMENTS RELATED TO THE GRANTS; AND (5) APPROPRIATING FUNDS IN THE 2017/18 BUDGET THEREFOR (4/5 VOTE REQUIRED) Recommended Action: Council adopt the resolution. 5.17-0213 RESOLUTION NO. 2017-124 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE THIRD AMENDMENT TO A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS (SANDAG) REGARDING AN ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT FOR GRADE SEPARATIONS AND STATIONS TO THE LIGHT RAIL TROLLEY’S (LRT) BLUE LINE, AUTHORIZING THE CITY ATTORNEY TO MAKE SUCH NON-SUBSTANTIVE CHANGES DEEMED NECESSARY FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE CITY, AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT Recommended Action: Council adopt the resolution. 6.17-0263 RESOLUTION NO. 2017-125 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO AND THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF COUNTY IMPROVEMENTS INCORPORATED INTO THE “WILLOW STREET BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT (STL-261)”; APPROVING THE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO AND THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE “WILLOW STREET BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT (STL-261)”; AND APPROPRIATING $39,778 TO THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND BASED ON REVENUE ASSOCIATED WITH SAID REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT TO STL-261 (4/5 VOTE REQUIRED) Page 3City of Chula Vista 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 25 July 11, 2017City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft Recommended Action: Council adopt the resolution. 7.17-0266 RESOLUTION NO. 2017-126 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA DECLARING THE REMAINING FUNDS IN REASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2005-01 AS SURPLUS, ORDERING THE DISPOSITION OF SURPLUS AMOUNTS, APPROVING THE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT CLOSEOUT ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS REPORT PREPARED BY NBS FOR REASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2005-1, APPROVING THE DISTRIBUTION OF $533,079 OF REASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2005-01 FUNDS FOR REFUNDING TO ELIGIBLE PROPERTY OWNERS, AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2017/2018 OPERATING AND CIP BUDGET AND ESTABLISHING A NEW CIP PROJECT “RANCHO DEL REY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION (STL-429)” AND APPROPRIATING $306,950 OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 87-1/ ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 88-2 IMPROVEMENT FUNDS TO CIP STL429 (4/5 VOTE REQUIRED) Recommended Action: Council adopt the resolution. 8.17-0241 RESOLUTION NO. 2017-127 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY TO PROVIDE ANIMAL SHELTER SERVICES Recommended Action: Council adopt the resolution. 9.17-0273 RESOLUTION NO. 2017-128 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2016/2017 OTHER GRANTS FUND BUDGET BY APPROPRIATING $33,405 TO THE ANIMAL CARE FACILITY GRANT FOR UNANTICIPATED GRANTS AND DONATIONS (4/5 VOTE REQUIRED) Recommended Action: Council adopt the resolution. 9.5 17-0304 A. RESOLUTION NO. 2017-129 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND THE WESTERN COUNCIL OF ENGINEERS (WCE), RELATED TO COMPENSATION AND OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT; AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AFOREMENTIONED MOU AND ANY ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS WHICH MAY BE NECESSARY OR REQUIRED TO IMPLEMENT SAID MOU Page 4City of Chula Vista 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 26 July 11, 2017City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft B. RESOLUTION NO. 2017-130 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE REVISED FISCAL YEAR 2017-2018 COMPENSATION SCHEDULE EFFECTIVE JULY 7, 2017, AS REQUIRED BY CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, TITLE 2, SECTION 570.5, TO REFLECT SALARY ADJUSTMENTS FOR EMPLOYEES IN THE WESTERN COUNCIL OF ENGINEERS (“WCE”) BARGAINING UNIT Recommended Action: Council adopt the resolutions. Approval of the Consent Calendar A motion was made by Deputy Mayor McCann, seconded by Councilmember Padilla, to approve staff's recommendations on the above Consent Calendar items, headings read, text waived. The motion carried by the following vote: ACTION: Yes:Diaz, McCann, Padilla and Casillas Salas4 - No:0 Abstain:0 ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR There were none. PUBLIC COMMENTS Steven Pavka, Chula Vista resident, withdrew his request to speak. PUBLIC HEARINGS 10.17-0286 CONSIDERATION OF AMENDING CHAPTER 10 (BUILDING), CHAPTER 11 (ENGINEERING), CHAPTER 14 (PLANNING), AND CHAPTER 15 (FIRE) OF THE CITY’S MASTER FEE SCHEDULE A. RESOLUTION NO. 2017-131 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING CITY COUNCIL POLICY 159-03 (CITYWIDE COST RECOVERY POLICY) B. RESOLUTION NO. 2017-132 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING CERTAIN SECTIONS OF CHAPTER 10 (BUILDING) OF THE CITY’S MASTER FEE SCHEDULE C. RESOLUTION NO. 2017-133 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING CERTAIN SECTIONS OF CHAPTER 11 (ENGINEERING) OF THE CITY’S MASTER FEE SCHEDULE D. RESOLUTION NO. 2017-134 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING CERTAIN SECTIONS OF CHAPTER 14 (PLANNING) OF THE CITY’S MASTER FEE SCHEDULE Page 5City of Chula Vista 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 27 July 11, 2017City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft E. RESOLUTION NO. 2017-135 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING CERTAIN SECTIONS OF CHAPTER 15 (FIRE) OF THE CITY’S MASTER FEE SCHEDULE F. RESOLUTION NO. 2017-136 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING THE AUTHORIZED POSITION COUNT FOR THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FUND TO REFLECT THE ADDITION OF 1.0 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TECHNICIAN III POSITION, 1.0 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TECHNICIAN II POSITION, AND 1.0 SENIOR PLANNER POSITION AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS THEREFOR (4/5 VOTE REQUIRED) G. RESOLUTION NO. 2017-137 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING AN AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE SOFTWARE UPGRADE, LICENSING, SUPPORT, AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY AND SELECTRON TECHNOLOGIES, INC., AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS THEREFOR (4/5 VOTE REQUIRED) Notice of the hearing was given in accordance with legal requirements, and the hearing was held on the date and no earlier than the time specified in the notice. Councilmember Diaz stated he would abstain from voting on Item 10B due to a potential financial-related conflict of interest. Development Services Director Broughton and Assistant Director Allen gave a presentation on the item. Mayor Casillas Salas opened the public hearing. Frank Rivera, Chula Vista resident, representing SEIU Local 221, spoke in support of the item. Nick Lee, Baldwin & Sons, spoke in support of the item. There being no other members of the public who wished to speak, Mayor Casillas Salas closed the public hearing. A motion was made by Mayor Casillas Salas, seconded by Deputy Mayor McCann, that Resolution Nos. 2017-131 (Item 10A) and 2017-133 through 2017-135 (Items 10C - 10E) be adopted, headings read, text waived. The motion carried by the following vote: ACTION: Yes:Diaz, McCann, Padilla and Casillas Salas4 - No:0 Abstain:0 A motion was made by Mayor Casillas Salas, seconded by Deputy Mayor McCann, that Resolution No. 2017-132 (Item 10B) be adopted, heading read, text waived. The motion carried by the following vote: ACTION: Yes:McCann, Padilla and Casillas Salas3 - No:0 Abstain:Diaz1 - Page 6City of Chula Vista 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 28 July 11, 2017City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft A motion was made by Deputy Mayor McCann, seconded by Mayor Casillas Salas, that Resolution Nos. 2017-136 and 2017-137 (Items 10F and 10G) be adopted, heading read, text waived. The motion carried by the following vote: ACTION: Yes:Diaz, McCann, Padilla and Casillas Salas4 - No:0 Abstain:0 11.17-0103 CONSIDERATION OF TESTIMONY FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2017/2018 LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS AND COLLECTION AGAINST THOSE ASSESSMENTS FOR CERTAIN OPEN SPACE AND MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS A. RESOLUTION NO. 2017-138 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA LEVYING THE ASSESSMENTS AND COLLECTIBLES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2017/2018 FOR OPEN SPACE DISTRICTS 2 THROUGH 7, 11, 14, 15, 17, 18, 20 (ZONES 1 THROUGH 6, 8, AND 9), 23, 24, 26, 31, 33, EASTLAKE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO 1 (ZONES A, B, D, AND E), AND BAY BOULEVARD MAINTENANCE DISTRICT B. RESOLUTION NO. 2017-139 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA LEVYING THE ASSESSMENTS AND COLLECTIBLES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2017/2018 FOR OPEN SPACE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 9, 10 AND TOWN CENTRE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT C. RESOLUTION NO. 2017-140 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA LEVYING THE ASSESSMENTS AND COLLECTIBLES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2017/2018 FOR OPEN SPACE DISTRICT 8 D. RESOLUTION NO. 2017-141 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA LEVYING THE ASSESSMENTS AND COLLECTIBLES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2017/2018 FOR OPEN SPACE DISTRICT 20 (ZONE 7) E. RESOLUTION NO. 2017-142 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA LEVYING THE ASSESSMENTS AND COLLECTIBLES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2017/2018 FOR OPEN SPACE DISTRICT 1 F. RESOLUTION NO. 2017-143 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA LEVYING THE ASSESSMENTS AND COLLECTIBLES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2017/2018 FOR EASTLAKE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 1 (ZONE C) Page 7City of Chula Vista 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 29 July 11, 2017City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft Notice of the hearing was given in accordance with legal requirements, and the hearing was held on the date and no earlier than the time specified in the notice. City Attorney Googins announced the following property-related conflicts of interest: Mayor Casillas Salas on Item 11B, Deputy Mayor McCann on Items 11D and 11E, and Councilmember Padilla on Item 11F. Mayor Salas opened the public hearing. There being no members of the public who wished to speak, Mayor Salas closed the public hearing. A motion was made by Deputy Mayor McCann, seconded by Councilmember Padilla, that Resolution No. 2017-138 (Item 11A) be adopted, heading read, text waived. The motion carried by the following vote: ACTION: Yes:Diaz, McCann, Padilla and Casillas Salas4 - No:0 Abstain:0 Mayor Salas left the dais at 6:44 p.m. A motion was made by Deputy Mayor McCann, seconded by Councilmember Padilla, that Resolution No. 2017-139 (Item 11B) be adopted, heading read, text waived. The motion carried by the following vote: ACTION: Yes:Diaz, McCann and Padilla3 - No:0 Abstain:Casillas Salas1 - Mayor Salas returned to the dais at 6:45 p.m. A motion was made by Deputy Mayor McCann, seconded by Mayor Casillas Salas, that Resolution No. 2017-140 (Item 11C) be adopted, heading read, text waived. The motion carried by the following vote: ACTION: Yes:Diaz, McCann, Padilla and Casillas Salas4 - No:0 Abstain:0 Deputy Mayor McCann left the dais at 6:46 p.m. A motion was made by Councilmember Padilla, seconded by Mayor Casillas Salas, that Resolution Nos. 2017-141 and 2017-142 (Items 11D and 11E) be adopted, heading read, text waived. The motion carried by the following vote: ACTION: Yes:Diaz, Padilla and Casillas Salas3 - No:0 Abstain:McCann1 - Page 8City of Chula Vista 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 30 July 11, 2017City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft Deputy Mayor McCann returned to the dais and Councilmember Padilla left at 6:47 p.m. A motion was made by Mayor Casillas Salas, seconded by Councilmember Diaz, that Resolution No. 2017-143 (Item 11F) be adopted, heading read, text waived. The motion carried by the following vote: ACTION: Yes:Diaz, McCann and Casillas Salas3 - No:0 Abstain:Padilla1 - Councilmember Padilla returned to the dais at 6:48 p.m. ACTION ITEMS 12.17-0086 CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING A CONTRACT TO JUST CONSTRUCTION, INC. FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF ADA CURB RAMPS AND REPLACEMENT OF THE CURB AND GUTTER CITYWIDE PROJECTS PROGRAM RESOLUTION NO. 2017-144 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING BIDS; AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF ADA CURB RAMPS FY2014/2015 (STL405), ADA CURB RAMPS FY2016/2017 (STL415), AND REPLACEMENT OF THE CURB AND GUTTER PROGRAM CITYWIDE FY2015/16 (STL407) PROJECTS TO JUST CONSTRUCTION, INC., IN THE AMOUNT OF $783,996; APPROPRIATING $50,000 FROM THE AVAILABLE BALANCE OF THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL FUND TO STL405; AND APPROPRIATING $150,000 IN TRANSNET FUNDS FROM STL424 TO STL405 (4/5 VOTE REQUIRED) Principal Civil Engineer Gomez gave a presentation on the item. A motion was made by Deputy Mayor McCann, seconded by Councilmember Padilla, that Resolution No. 2017-144 be adopted, heading read, text waived. The motion carried by the following vote: ACTION: Yes:Diaz, McCann, Padilla and Casillas Salas4 - No:0 Abstain:0 CITY MANAGER’S REPORTS City Manager Halbert reported a slight improvement on sales tax revenue. He stated that the closed session item would be continued to August 8. Page 9City of Chula Vista 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 31 July 11, 2017City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft MAYOR’S REPORTS 13.17-0258 RESOLUTION NO. 2017-159 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ADOPTING THE 2017/2018 LEGISLATIVE PROGRAM (This item was continued from August 8, 2017.) Recommended Action: Council adopt the resolution. At the request of Mayor Casillas Salas, there was consensus of the Council to continue Item 13 to the meeting of August 8, 2017. 14.17-0287 APPOINTMENT OF CITY COUNCILMEMBERS TO OUTSIDE AGENCY: - Interagency Water Task Force A motion was made by Mayor Casillas Salas, seconded by Deputy Mayor McCann, that Councilmember Diaz and Mayor Casillas Salas be appointed to the Interagency Water Task Force. The motion carried by the following vote: ACTION: Yes:Diaz, McCann, Padilla and Casillas Salas4 - No:0 Abstain:0 15.17-0305 DISCUSSION OF FORM OF COOPERATIVE RELATIONSHIP WITH THE GOVERNING BOARD OF SOUTHWESTERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT FOR DEVELOPMENT OF A UNIVERSITY PROJECT IN CHULA VISTA, AND CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION TO FORM A COUNCIL SUBCOMMITTEE OR OTHER MECHANISM TO IMPLEMENT THIS COOPERATIVE RELATIONSHIP A motion was made by Mayor Casillas Salas, seconded by Deputy Mayor McCann, that a joint task force consisting of representatives from the City and from the Governing Board of Southwestern College Community District be created; that Mayor Casillas Salas and Councilmember Aguilar be appointed as the City representatives on the task force; and that the City representatives be authorized to develop the terms and conditions of the task force, including the focus of the subject matter, the meeting schedule, and other similar details. The motion carried by the following vote: ACTION: Yes:Diaz, McCann, Padilla and Casillas Salas4 - No:0 Abstain:0 City Attorney Googins stated that the task force would be subject to the requirements of the Ralph M. Brown Act. COUNCILMEMBERS’ COMMENTS Deputy Mayor McCann, Councilmember Padilla, and Mayor Casillas Salas all spoke regarding the recent 4th of July events. Mayor Casillas Salas thanked the Police Department and all staff involved. Page 10City of Chula Vista 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 32 July 11, 2017City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft CLOSED SESSION 16.17-0288 CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 -Property: Assessors Parcel Number (APN) 643-06-57-00 -Agency Negotiators: Gary Halbert and Eric Crockett -Negotiating Parties: City of Chula Vista and Chesnut Properties -Under Negotiation: Price and Terms of Payment for Acquisition and Leaseback Mayor Casillas Salas announced that Item 16 would be continued to August 8, 2017. ADJOURNMENT At 7:02 p.m., Mayor Casillas Salas adjourned the meeting to the Regular City Council Meeting on July 25, 2017, at 5:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers. _______________________________ Sheree Kansas, Deputy City Clerk Page 11City of Chula Vista 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 33 City of Chula Vista Staff Report File#:17-0374, Item#: 2. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING CHAPTER 3.45 OF THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE (MASTER FEE SCHEDULE) (SECOND READING AND ADOPTION) RECOMMENDED ACTION Council adopt the ordinance. SUMMARY The City regularly receives requests for fee waivers. Per the Chula Vista Municipal Code and the City’s Master Fee Schedule, the City Manager’s authority to waive fees is limited to the greater of $2,500 or 25% of the fee imposed per the Schedule. Larger fee waivers require Council action. In order to increase efficiency and timeliness in responding to minor fee waiver requests, an increase in the City Manager’s fee waiver authority from $2,500 to $7,500 is recommended. Additional guidance regarding fee waivers is provided in various City Council Policies. Repeal of these policies and consolidation of all fee waiver authority and guidance in the Master Fee Schedule is also recommended. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Environmental Notice The activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required. Environmental Determination The Director of Development Services has reviewed the proposed activity for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that this activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines because it will not result in a physical change to the environment; therefore, pursuant to Section 15060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Thus, no environmental review is required. BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Not Applicable. DISCUSSION The Master Fee Schedule (“Schedule”) is a centralized listing of fees charged by the City for services, administrative acts, and other legally required fees. The Schedule and Chapter 3.45 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code both include provisions for fee reductions, waivers, deferrals, or a combination thereof (generally “waivers”), and identify a Waiving Authority based upon the amount of waiver requested. For waivers less than or equal to the greater of $2,500 or 25% of the fee imposed, Waiving Authority is vested in the City Manager, or their designee. For fee waivers in excess of this threshold, City Council approval is required. Waivers by both the City Manager and the City Council City of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 1 of 3 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 34 File#:17-0374, Item#: 2. threshold, City Council approval is required. Waivers by both the City Manager and the City Council require a public hearing (unpublished, but directly noticed to interested parties). The dollar limit on the City Manager’s Waiver Authority was established via Ordinance 2506 in 1992, and has remained unchanged since that time. Preparing a fee waiver request for Council consideration requires significant staff expense and approximately three weeks to process. Increasing the City Manager’s waiver authority from $2,500 to $7,500 will reduce the number of fee waivers requiring Council action. Delegating this additional authority to the City Manager will reduce General Fund costs and improve the City’s ability to respond to minor fee waiver requests in a timely manner. Further efficiencies are gained by removing the public hearing requirement. Notice to interested parties will continue to be provided. Controls to ensure transparency and fairness are also proposed. A maximum annual City Manager waiver amount per organization of $7,500 is recommended, with each school site considered an organization for purposes of the cap. Organizations requesting annual waivers in excess of $7,500 would require Council approval. Transparency and accountability will be achieved through an annual accounting to the City Council of the fees waived by the City Manager, to be provided in conjunction with the regular fourth quarter financial report. Waiver decisions by the City Manager will be appealable to the City Council. Decisions by the City Council will be considered final. Fee Waiver Authority & Guidance Consolidation The City has adopted a number of documents addressing the issue of fee waivers, including the previously described language in the Schedule and Municipal Code. Additional guidance can be found in the City Council’s Policy Manual (Policies 200-01, 267-05, and 861-04, see Attachments 1 through 3). Establishing fee waiver authority in multiple documents may lead to confusion and inconsistency. In order to reduce future confusion and errors, consolidating all fee waiver authority and guidance to the Master Fee Schedule (Attachment 4) and repealing the above referenced City Council Policies is recommended. Master Fee Schedule Administrative Update Authority Additional edits to explicitly authorize staff to make minor administrative updates to Chapter 1 of the Master Fee Schedule are also recommended. For ease of reference, Chapter 1 provides data and rates that are not subject to approval of the City Council, but that may impact fee payers. For purposes of determining eligibility for low income fee programs, the Master Fee Schedule details the 80% level of median family income for the San Diego Metropolitan Statistical Area, as determined by the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Allowing staff to administratively update the income rates listed will ensure current information is provided to the public. Similarly, the City Council does not take action to approve the City’s fully burdened hourly rates. Allowing staff to administratively update the Master Fee Schedule to reflect current rates supports transparency in the City’s full cost recovery billing. DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT Staff has reviewed the decision contemplated by this action and has determined that it is not site- specific and consequently, the 500-foot rule found in California Code of Regulations Title 2, section 18702.2(a)(11), is not applicable to this decision for purposes of determining a disqualifying real property-related financial conflict of interest under the Political Reform Act (Cal. Gov't Code § 87100, et seq.). City of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 2 of 3 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 35 File#:17-0374, Item#: 2. Staff is not independently aware, and has not been informed by any City Council member, of any other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter. LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS The City’s Strategic Plan has five major goals: Operational Excellence, Economic Vitality, Healthy Community, Strong and Secure Neighborhoods and a Connected Community. Standardizing and consolidating fee waiver authority and increasing the authority delegated to the City Manager supports the Operational Excellence goal by increasing efficiency. It also supports the Connected Community goal by reducing barriers to community organizations seeking fee waivers. CURRENT YEAR FISCAL IMPACT No appropriations are recommended in conjunction with this item. Increasing the City Manager’s fee waiver authority streamlines the waiver process, increasing efficiency and reducing staff costs. Actual impacts will vary based upon the number of fee waivers that would have required Council action but that are now processed administratively. ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT Increasing the City Manager’s fee waiver authority streamlines the waiver process, increasing efficiency and reducing staff costs. Actual impacts will vary based upon the number of fee waivers that would have required Council action but that are now processed administratively. Annual reports to the City Council of fee waivers approved will ensure a transparent process and provide an opportunity for the City Council to provide additional guidance regarding administrative approval of fee waivers in the future. ATTACHMENTS 1. City Council Policy 200-01: Specific Categories of Development Project Assistance or Fee Subsidies 2. City Council Policy 267-05: Waiver of Fees for Community Service Organizations 3. City Council Policy 861-04: Green Fees at Chula Vista Municipal Golf Course 4. Redline Master Fee Schedule Section 1-100 (General - Introduction) Staff Contact: Tiffany Allen, Development Services Department City of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 3 of 3 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 36 J COUNCIL POLICY CITY OF CHUTA VISTA SUBJECT: SPECIFIC CATEGORIES OF DEVELOPMENT POLICY FsFFECTIVE PROJECT' ASSISTANCE OR FEE SUBSIDIES NUMBER DATE PAGE 200-01 OS-11-93 1 OF 3 ADOPTED BY: Resolution No. 17086/RDA No. 1324 DATED: OS-11-93 BACKGROUND At a joint City Council/Redevelopment Agency meeting on May 11, 1993, the City Council and Redevelopment Agency approved the establishment of a policy on specific categories of development project assistance or fee subsidies to address certain impacts of the Master Fee Schedule update which was completed on Mazch 23, 1993. PURPOSE Establishing a policy for special consideration of various impacu of city fees. POLICY A Category I. Very I.ow-Income Residential For residential development proposals of less than twenty (20) dwelling units which 1. Are not part of a Planned Community development 2. Consist of new construction or major refurbishment (remodeling valued at or above 125,000) 3. Are determined by the city to serve Yery Low-Income housing needs (not in excess of 50% of median income), according to the median azea income statistics compiled annually by the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for the San Diego meh~opolitan area, A grant of 25% of the total fees far each Very I.ow-Income unit for: 1. Electrical Permits 2. Plumbing Pezmits 3. Building Permits may be provided by the City against the cost of said fees. Depending upon funding availability and qualifications, said grant may be provided from the Redevelopment Agency Low•Moderate Income Housing Fund and/or Home Investrnent Partnership funds. Otherwise, said grant would take the form of a subsidy of that portion of the fees, with the associated cosu absorbed by the General Fund. On a case-by-case basis, if the City or Agency or Chula Vista Housing Authority determines that other incentives, subsidies or assistance of similar or greater value may be snore appropriate, said incentives, subsidies or assistance may be provided in lieu of the aforementioned grant. Whenever such a determination is made, it shall be subject to all applicable ordinances, policies and procedures -including those regazding authority to grant fee waivers and approve development agreements. No such assistance shall be granted absent some form of written agreement and/or compliance measures assuring to the citl~s satisfaction that dte project in question will indeed meet the identified housing needs. - 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 37 ii ~I~N~PO~~ uC1TYOFCHLJLAVLSl'A SUBIECT: SPECIFIC CATEGORIES OF DEVELOPMENT 1'OI.dCl' 1~IYVEPROJECTASSISTANCEORFEESUBSIDIESN[J]yjB~ DATE PAGE 200-01 OS-11-93 2 OF 3 ADOPTED BY: Resolution No. 17086/RDA No. 1324 DATED: OS-11-93 B. Category II. Lower-Income Residential For residential development proposals of less than twenty (20) dwelling units which 1. Are not part of a Planned Community development2. Consist of new construction or major trfiubishmmt (rmodeling valued at or above S2S,000)3. Are determined by the city to serve Lowaz-Income housing needs (not in excess of 60% of medianincome), according to the median azea income statistics compiled annually by the federalDepartmentofHousingandUrbanDevelopment (HUD) for the San Diego metropolitan azea, A grant of 10% of the total fees for each Lower-Income unit for: 1. Electrical Permits 2. Plumbing Permits 3. Building Permits may be provided by the City against the cost of said fees. Depending upon funding availability andqualifications, said grant may be provided from the Redevelopment Agency Low-Moderate IncomeHousingFundand/or Home Investment Partnership funds. Otherwise, said grant would take the formofasubsidyof that portion of the fees, with the associated costs absorbed by the General Fund. On a case-by-case basis, if the City or Agency or Chula Vista Housing Authority determines that otherincentives, subsidies or assistance of similaz or greater value may be more appropriate, said incentives,subsidies or assistance may be provided in lieu of the aforementioned grant. Whenever such a determination is made, it shall be subject to all applicable ordinances, policies andprocedures, including those regazding authority to grant fee waivers, and approval of developmentagreements. No such assistance shall be granted absent some form of written agreement and/orcompliancemeasuresassuringtothecity~s satisfaction that the project in question wr71 indeed meet dreidentifiedhousingneeds. C. Category III. Residential Improvemmts/Fapansion (General) For improvements to or expansions of existing residential dwelling units which do not increase thenumberofEquivalentDwellingUnits (EDUs) and which do not come under the purview of Category IorII, No special consideration of fees shall be given to such projects and any fee waiver requests shallbeprocessedaccordingtothecurrentfeewaiverordinanceand/or policies. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 38 COUNCII, POI ICY CITY OF CI-ILJLA VISTA SUBJECT: SPECIFIC CATEGORIES OF DEVELOPMENT POLICY EFFECI~IVE PROJECT ASSISTANCE OR FEE SUBSIDIES NUMBER DATE PAGE 200-01 OS-11-93 3 OF 3 ADOPTED BY: Resolution No. 17086/RDA No. 1324 DATED: OS-11-93 D. Category 1V. Busineas (General) No special consideration of fees shall be given to such projects and any fee waiver requests shall be processed according to the current fee waiver ordinance and/or policies. E. Granting Authority The City Council and Redevelopment Agency hereby delegate the authority to the City Manager to make such grants or authorize such assistance pureLnt to this policy as may be less the 62,500, upon giving an informational memo to the Counc~ and/or Agency. If the amount of the grant or assistance is in e=cess of 62,500, said grant or assistance shall be subject to rnnsideration by the Councl and/or Agency, depending on the funding sources of the asiistance. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 39 J i i COUNCII. POLICY CITY OF CHULA VISTA SUBJECT: WAIVER OF FEES FOR COMMUNITY SERVICE POLICY EFFECTIVE ORGANIZATIONS NUMBER DATE PAGE 267-OS 11-24-87 1 OF 1 ADOPTED BY: Resolution No. 13360 DATED: 11-24-87 BACKGROUND The lack of an established Council Policy delineating the criteria for waiver of fees by nonprofit entities has raised the need for a policy that will govern such waivers requested by nonprofit organizations. It is considered appropriate to waive fees imposed by the City for those organizations which meet the criteria established by this policy. PURPOSE To establish a standard policy by which nonprofit organization may be exempt from those fees established and imposed by the City. POLICY Fees established and imposed by the City may be waived for nonprofit organizations where the City Council determines that the value of the public service performed by the organization merits the waiver of fees. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 40 i COUNCII. POLICY CITY OF CHULA VISTA SUBJECT: GREEN FEES AT CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL POLICY EFFECTIVE GOLF couRSE NUMBER DATE PAGE 861-04 06-10-75 1 OF 1 ADOPTED BY: Resolution No. 7778 DATED: 06-1U-75 BACKGROUND The City Council desires to provide an equitable policy for the disposition of requests for the waiver of green fees at the Chula Vista Municipal Golf Course by various organizations conducting money-raising tournaments. PURPOSE The Director of Parks and Recreation authorized and directed to give every assistance to all civic and charitable organizations in the arrangement of fund-raising tournaments at the Chula Vista Municipal Golf Course. POLICY City of Chula Vista has determined and reaffirms the total waiver of green fees at the Chula Vista Municipal Golf Course for the following tournaments: 1. Local high school and college tournaments 2. Chula Vista Junior Golf Championship Tournament 3. San Diego County P.G.A. Pro/Am Toumament The staff is directed to make appropriate arrangements for dates and times of such tournaments mutually beneficial to the City and the organizations. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 41 MASTER FEE SCHEDULE FEE BULLETIN Chapter 1 - General 1-100 Introduction City of Chula Vista Finance Department 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 91910 May August 20107 City of Chula Vista www.chulavistaca.gov 619.691.5250 GENERAL Section 3.42.010 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code states that the City Council shall adopt, by resolution, a Master Fee Schedule, indicating therein the fees for all services, administrative acts and other legally required fees, which resolution may be amended from time to time and shall be effective upon first reading and approval; provided, however, such resolutions may specify therein their applicability, if any, to applications currently in the process of review. A copy of the Master Fee Schedule shall be maintained in the office of the City Clerk and in each department of the City. Print copies of the Master Fee Schedule may be purchased. Fee per printed schedule .............................. $6.00 DELINQUENT PAYMENT Unless otherwise specified by ordinance, resolution, Master Fee Schedule or invoice, a payment shall be considered delinquent or late if it is not received within thirty (30) days of billing. Delinquent payments shall be subject to the Delinquent Payment Penalty detailed in Fee Bulletin 13-100. FEE WAIVERS The fees set forth in the Master Fee Schedule may be waived or deferred, in whole or in part, by the Waiving Authority, as defined herein below: Waiving Authority, as the term is used herein, shall mean the City Manager, or designee, if the amount of such waiver is less than or equal to the greater of (1) $7,500 or (2) 25% of the fee imposed by the Master Fee Schedule. If the amount of the waiver is greater than the greater of $7,500 or 25% off the original fee imposed by the Master Fee Schedule, the Waiving Authority, as used herein shall mean the City Council. Further, the Waiving Authority for cumulative waivers to a single applicant within a 12 month period in excess of $7,500 shall mean the City Council. For purposes of this provision, each school site shall be considered a separate applicant. , in accordance with the following procedures: Any person requesting a reduction, waiver or deferral, or a combination thereof, of a fee herein charged shall request said adjustment in writing, addressed to the Waiving Authority, and shall set forth therein, with specificity, the reasons for requesting said abatement of all or any portion of the fees. The Waiving Authority shall conduct a public hearing, notice of which is not required to be published. Notice of said public hearing shall be given to the applicant and to any party or parties requesting notice of same. Prior to adjusting all or any portion of a fee established in the master fee schedule, the Waiving Authority shall make at least one of the following findingsfind that either: (1) the fee, when applied in the particular case under review, would require the applicant to pay an amount which is significantly and disproportionately larger than other fee payers given the rights of enjoyment of, or benefits of, the facility or program for which the fee is paid, or (2) the applicant will suffer a peculiar economic hardship or other injustice from the payment of the fee which outweighs, when balanced against, the need of the City for revenue and the need for a uniform method of recovering same from those against whom it is imposed. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 42 May August 20107 MASTER FEE SCHEDULE FEE BULLETIN 1-100 Page 2 of 3 City of Chula Vista www.chulavistaca.gov 619.691.5250 (3) the applicant is a nonprofit organization and the value of public service performed by the organization merits the waiver requested. The Waiving Authority shall issue a notice of decision, including imposition ofimpose such terms and conditions on the adjustment waiver as deemed appropriate. , and shall given dDue consideration shall be given to terms and conditions involving interest on amount deferred and, security to assure the eventual collection. Decisions of the City Manager, or designee, as Waiving Authority shall be subject to appeal to the City Council. Applicants wishing to make such an appeal must submit their request in writing to the City Clerk, within ten (10) business days of issuance of the City Manager’s notice of decision. The appeal shall be addressed to the City Council, and shall set forth therein, with specificity, the reasons for requesting said appeal of the City Manager’s decision. The City Council shall consider the appeal within 60 days of filing, or as soon thereafter as practical. Decisions of the City Council as Waiving Authority shall be deemed final. In no instance will lost revenues resulting from a fee waiver be recouped from other fee payers. Impacts to enterprise funds will be offset using discretionary funds. Waiving Authority, as the term is used herein, shall mean the City Manager, or his designee, if the amount of such waiver is less than or equal to the greater of (1) $2,500 or (2) 25% of the fee imposed by the Master Fee Schedule. If the amount of the waiver is greater than the greater of $2,500 or 25% off the original fee imposed by the Master Fee Schedule, the Waiving Authority, as used herein shall mean the City Council. LOW INCOME HOUSEHOLDS Eligibility for City programs or fee schedules restricted to low income households shall be based on the 80% level of median family income for the San Diego Metropolitan Statistical Area as determined annually by the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and detailed below: NO. IN HOUSEHOLD MAXIMUM ANNUAL FAMILY INCOME (Gross for Eligibility) 1 $46,25050,950 2 $52,90058,200 3 $59,50065,600 4 $66,10072,750 5 $71,40078,600 6 $76,70084,400 7 $81,95090,250 8 $8796,250050 An additional $1,000 annual income allowed for each additional person in household in excess of eight (8). [2009 2017 HUD Median Income Data, effective 0304/1917/0917] The maximum annual family income rates are not adopted by the City Council and are provided in the Master Fee Schedule for informational purposes only. Rates listed in the Master Fee Schedule may be updated administratively based upon HUD action without Council approval. COST RECOVERY The Master Fee Schedule reports fees for services that are provided to our citizens and visitors. The cost of providing these services includes both direct staff costs and various support and overhead costs. Fees that do not recover the full cost of providing services result in a subsidy which shifts funds away from critical, high priority needs such as public safety initiatives and infrastructure maintenance. In November 1982 the City Council adopted Resolution 11063 adopting a policy of full cost recovery, under which both the direct and overhead costs associated with providing public services are identified and, when possible, recovered. To facilitate this process, City staff annually develops a set of fully burdened hourly rates (FBHR), providing a convenient method for calculating the full costs of services. A discussion 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 43 May August 20107 MASTER FEE SCHEDULE FEE BULLETIN 1-100 Page 3 of 3 City of Chula Vista www.chulavistaca.gov 619.691.5250 of the costs included in the calculation of the FBHR, as well as the current fiscal year rate for each classification in the City is detailed in Fee Bulletin 1-200. The City’s fully burdened rates serve as a basis for identifying the true cost of providing services, calculating fixed fee levels, and understanding the fiscal impacts of fee subsidies. The City’s fully burdened rates are not subject to annual Council adoption and are included in the Master Fee Schedule for informational purposes only. Rates may be updated administratively without additional Council action. Please contact the Finance Department to confirm current rates. 1. Full Cost Recovery Deposits Significant variances in staff time required to provide certain services make application of a fixed fee schedule impracticable. In these instances, the applicant is charged for services provided on a reimbursement basis, using the fully burdened hourly staff rates. These reimbursement based fees are designated in the Master Fee Schedule as “full cost recovery”. Initial Deposit For each such fee, an initial deposit is required. The average initial deposit amount, or an initial deposit schedule, is provided in the Master Fee Schedule for each full cost recovery deposit based fee. In all instances, the department shall determine the appropriate deposit for each application and shall attempt to limit that deposit to a reasonable amount. Additional Deposits If, at any time, it appears that the deposit amount will be insufficient to cover accumulated City costs, the applicant shall deposit additional amounts as required by the Department Head. Consultant Services If the City determines that consultants are required to assist in the processing of any permit, the City reserves the right to retain and pay such consultants from fees collected from the applicant. Release of Deposit Any funds remaining on deposit at the time of the completion or withdrawal of the application shall be returned to the depositor, after accounting for expenses, including overhead, incurred to date. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 44 SECOND READING AND ADOPTION ORDINANCE NO. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING CHAPTER 3.45 OF THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE (MASTER FEE SCHEDULE) WHEREAS, Section 3.45.10 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code (Master Fee Schedule; Established – Purpose) establishes waiver authority for fees set forth in the Master Fee Schedule; and WHEREAS, the same waiver authority is established in Chapter 1 (General) of the City’s Master Fee Schedule itself; and WHEREAS, multiple points of legislative authority may lead to confusion and inconsistency in application; and WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to consolidate all fee waiver authority in Chapter 1 of the Master Fee Schedule. NOW THEREFORE the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does ordain as follows: Section I. Chapter 3.45, Section 3.45.010, of the Chula Vista Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 3.45.010 Established – Purpose. A. The City Council shall adopt, by resolution, a master fee schedule, indicating therein the fees for all services, administrative acts and other legally required fees, which resolution may be amended from time to time and shall be effective upon first reading and approval; provided, however, such resolutions may specify therein their applicability, if any, to applications currently in the process of review. B. A copy of the master fee schedule shall be maintained in the office of the City Clerk and in each department of the City. C. The fees set forth in the master fee schedule may be waived by the waiving authority, as defined in, and pursuant to the provisions of, the master fee schedule, as may be amended from time to time by resolution of the City Council. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 45 Ordinance Page 2 Section II. Severability If any portion of this Ordinance, or its application to any person or circumstance, is for any reason held to be invalid, unenforceable or unconstitutional, by a court of competent jurisdiction, that portion shall be deemed severable, and such invalidity, unenforceability or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining portions of the Ordinance, or its application to any other person or circumstance. The City Council of the City of Chula Vista hereby declares that it would have adopted each section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance, irrespective of the fact that any one or more other sections, sentences, clauses or phrases of the Ordinance be declared invalid, unenforceable or unconstitutional. Section III. Construction The City Council of the City of Chula Vista intends this Ordinance to supplement, not to duplicate or contradict, applicable state and federal law and this Ordinance shall be construed in light of that intent. Section IV. Effective Date This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force on the thirtieth day after its final passage. Section V. Publication The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published or posted according to law. Presented by Approved as to form by _____________________________________ ____________________________________ Kelly G. Broughton,FASLA Glen R. Googins Director of Development Services City Attorney 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 46 City of Chula Vista Staff Report File#:17-0308, Item#: 3. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING COUNCIL POLICY 104-01, “ORDER OF BUSINESS AT CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS,” TO ADD CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORTS PRIOR TO CLOSED SESSION RECOMMENDED ACTION Council adopt the resolution. SUMMARY Adoption of the proposed Resolution will provide a section on City Council agendas entitled “City Attorney’s Reports” and will designate where in the order of business the city attorney’s report will be considered. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Environmental Notice The activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required. Environmental Determination The Director of Development Services has reviewed the proposed activity for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines because it will not result in a physical change in the environment; therefore, pursuant to Section 15060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Thus, no environmental review is required. BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Not Applicable DISCUSSION Council Policy 104-01 describes the standard items and order in which items on the City Council agendas will be heard. The City Attorney often makes reports on matters of city business and currently provides such reports on an informal basis, following council comments. The City Attorney recommends adoption of the Resolution to formalize the location on the agenda in which the City Attorney may provide his reports. DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT Staff has reviewed the decision contemplated by this action and has determined that it is not site- City of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 1 of 2 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 47 File#:17-0308, Item#: 3. Staff has reviewed the decision contemplated by this action and has determined that it is not site- specific and consequently, the 500-foot rule found in California Code of Regulations Title 2, section 18702.2(a)(11), is not applicable to this decision for purposes of determining a disqualifying real property-related financial conflict of interest under the Political Reform Act (Cal. Gov't Code § 87100, et seq.). Staff is not independently aware, and has not been informed by any City Councilmember, of any other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter. LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS Not applicable. CURRENT YEAR FISCAL IMPACT There is no current year fiscal impact associated with this item. ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT There is no ongoing year fiscal impact associated with this item. ATTACHMENTS 1. Proposed Amendments to City Council Policy 104-01 Staff Contact: Glen Googins, City Attorney City of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 2 of 2 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 48 RESOLUTION NO. __________ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING COUNCIL POLICY 104-01, “ORDER OF BUSINESS AT CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS,” TO ADD CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORTS PRIOR TO CLOSED SESSION WHEREAS, Council Policy 104-01, adopted by resolution of the City Council, establishes the order of business at City Council meetings; and WHEREAS, in the past, the City Council has discussed amending the order of business to add a formal section on the agenda for reports by the City Attorney on matters of City business. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, that it hereby amends Council Policy 104-01 (Order of Business at City Council Meetings) to provide a section on CityCouncil agendas entitled “City Attorney’s Report,” as set forth in Exhibit 1 to this Resolution, attached and incorporated by this reference. Presented by Approved as to form by Glen R. Googins Glen R. Googins City Attorney City Attorney 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 49 COUNCIL POLICY CITY OF CHULA VISTA SUBJECT: ORDER OF BUSINESS AT CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS POLICY NUMBER EFFECTIVE DATE PAGE 104-01 03/03/2015 9/12/2017 1 of 1 ADOPTED BY: Resolution No. 16069 DATED: 02/19/1991 AMENDED BY: Resolution Nos.: 16755 (08/18/92); 18520 (12/10/96); 2005-342 (10/11/05); 2015- 002 (01/06/2015)/ ); 2015-054 (03/03/2015); 2017-___ (09/12/2017) BACKGROUND The City Council, pursuant to Municipal Code §2.04.140, establishes its order of business at Council meetings by resolution. Historically, the order of business has also been incorporated into the Council Policy Manual. PURPOSE To establish the order of business at City Council meetings. POLICY Items shall be considered in the following order at City Council meetings: 1. Roll Call 2. Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag/Moment of Silence 3. Special Orders of the Day 4. Consent Calendar 5. Items Removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion 6. Public Comments 7. Public Hearings 8. Board and Commission Reports 9. Action Items 10. City Manager’s Reports 11. Mayor’s Reports 12. Council Comments 13. City Attorney’s Reports 14. Closed Session 15. Adjournment Upon the consent of a majority of the Council at a meeting, items may be taken out of the above order. Resolution No. 16069, approved 02/19/91, adopted the original policy, which was amended by Resolution 16755 on 08/18/92, Resolution 18520 on 12/10/96, Resolution 2005-342 on 10/11/2005, Resolution 2015-002 on 01/06/2015, and Resolution 2015-054 on March 3, 2015. I certify that this is the true and correct version of said Policy, adopted by the City Council of the City Of Chula Vista on the day of , 20 . Signed & Dated 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 50 City of Chula Vista Staff Report File#:17-0388, Item#: 4. INVESTMENT REPORT FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2017 RECOMMENDED ACTION Council accept the report. SUMMARY Transmitted herewith is the City’s investment report for the quarter ended June 30, 2017. To meet the reporting requirements set forth in the California Government Code Sections 53600 et seq. and the City of Chula Vista Investment Policy and Guidelines, a separate report was distributed to the City Council in July. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Development Services Director has reviewed the proposed activity for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the activity is not a “Project” in accordance with Section 15378(b)(5) of the State CEQA Guidelines because it involves only acceptance of the Quarterly Investment Report; therefore it is an organizational or administrative activity of government that will not result in a direct or indirect physical change in the environment; therefore, pursuant to Section 15060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines the activity is not subject to CEQA. Thus, no environmental review is necessary. Environmental Notice The activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required. BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Not Applicable. DISCUSSION The total cash and investment portfolio held by the City as of June 30, 2017 was $260,034,346 and total cash and investments held by the trustees was $85,839,787. The cash and investments held by the City are composed of the following components: Managed Investment Portfolio ($150,445,446), State of CA Local Agency Investment Fund ($1,652,884), County of San Diego Pooled Investment Fund ($88,008,059), Cash/Time Deposits ($17,578,253), unrealized gain ($1,504,228), and accrued interest on investment ($845,476). Cash and investments held by the City and the trustees continue to be invested in accordance with the Government Code and the Council Investment Policy as adopted by Resolution 2017-078 on May 23, 2017. During the quarter, three investments matured totaling $8,400,000 and five purchases were made to invest idle cash. Purchased investments include: two corporate notes issued by Caterpillar City of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 1 of 3 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 51 File#:17-0388, Item#: 4. invest idle cash. Purchased investments include: two corporate notes issued by Caterpillar ($2,450,000) and American Honda ($1,500,000); two certificates of deposit ($6,000,000); and one commercial paper ($3,000,000). Public Financial Management (PFM), the City's investment advisor, continues to monitor the portfolio and will make recommendations as financial and economic conditions warrant. There is no further activity to report on other than routine investments by the City's fiscal agents. For the second time this year, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) raised the federal funds rate by 0.25%, setting a new target range of 1.00% to 1.25%. Two-year Treasuries yielding 1.26% at the beginning of the quarter ended higher at the end of the quarter at 1.38%. As of June 30, 2017, the Yield to Maturity at Cost on the Managed Investment Portfolio was 1.46%, which was an increase of three basis points from the previous quarter. At the end of this quarter, the weighted average maturity of the Managed Investment Portfolio was 1.72 years which is a decrease from 1.91 the previous quarter and is within the Council Policy. DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT Staff has determined that the action contemplated by this item is ministerial, secretarial, manual, or clerical in nature and, as such, does not require the City Council members to make or participate in making a governmental decision, pursuant to California Code of Regulations Title 2, section 18704(d) (1). Consequently, this item does not present a conflict of interest under the Political Reform Act (Cal. Gov't Code § 87100, et seq.). Staff is not independently aware, and has not been informed by any City Council member, of any other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter. LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS The City’s Strategic Plan has five major goals: Operational Excellence, Economic Vitality, Healthy Community, Strong and Secure Neighborhoods and a Connected Community. The investment portfolio supports the Operational Excellence goal as it seeks to maintain the safety and liquidity of the City’s cash while contributing investment earnings to the bottom line. CURRENT YEAR FISCAL IMPACT Considering the projected timing of cash receipts and disbursements and the structure of the Pooled Investment Portfolio, the City should be able to comfortably meet overall cash flow needs over the next six months. There is no direct fiscal impact by this action. ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT There is no ongoing fiscal impact by this action. ATTACHMENTS 1. Summary of Cash and Investments as of June 30, 2017 2. PFM Investment Report for the Quarter Ended June 30, 2017 Staff Contact: Lisa Partee, Fiscal Management Analyst, Finance Department City of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 2 of 3 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 52 File#:17-0388, Item#: 4. David Bilby, Director of Finance/Treasurer, Finance Department City of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 3 of 3 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 53 % of Investment Type Par Value Market Value Book Value Portfolio Managed Investment Portfolio BNY Custodial Cash Account $1,697,603 $1,697,603 $1,697,603 0.49% U.S. Treasury Bond/Note 58,930,000 58,774,423 58,957,668 17.05% Federal Agency Collateralized Mtg Ob.1,233,020 1,232,761 1,245,368 0.36% Federal Agency Bond/Note 9,615,000 9,594,072 9,615,000 2.78% Corporate Notes 43,001,000 43,476,005 43,581,871 12.60% Commercial Paper 9,000,000 8,960,982 8,932,226 2.58% Certificates of Deposit 21,000,000 21,023,702 21,000,000 6.07% Asset Back Securities/Collateralized Mtg Ob. 5,414,786 5,398,894 5,415,711 1.57% Managed Investment Portfolio Subtotal 149,891,409 150,158,441 150,445,446 43.50% Pooled Investments State of CA Local Agency Investment Fund 1,652,884 1,651,133 1,652,884 0.48% County of San Diego Pooled Investment Fund 88,008,059 88,008,059 88,008,059 25.45% Pooled Investments Subtotal 89,660,943 89,659,192 89,660,943 25.92% Cash/Time Deposits 17,578,253 17,578,253 17,578,253 5.08% Unrealized Gain on Fair Market Value 1,504,228 1,504,228 1,504,228 0.43% Accrued Interest 845,476 845,476 845,476 0.24% Total Cash & Investments Held by the City $259,480,309 $259,745,590 $260,034,346 75.18% Held by Bank Trustee/Fiduciary Funds (1) Investment Agreements 0 0 0 0.00% Mutual Funds 35,897,965 35,897,965 35,897,965 10.38% Cash with Fiscal Agents 28,227,841 28,227,841 28,227,841 8.16% Restricted Cash 791,199 791,199 791,199 0.23% U.S. Gov't 20,922,782 20,922,782 20,922,782 6.05% Total Held by Bank Trustee/Fiduciary Funds $85,839,787 $85,839,787 $85,839,787 24.82% Total Portfolio $345,320,096 $345,585,378 $345,874,134 100.00% Notes: 1. Reflects bond proceeds and tax levy revenues held by trustee in accordance with bond covenants. 2. Par value is the principal amount of the investment on maturity. 3. Market values contained herein are received from sources we believe are reliable, however we do not guarantee their accuracy. 4. LAIF market value on the PFM statement does not include the market value factor as included in the market value above. 5. Book value is par value of the security plus or minus any premium or discount and accrued interest included in purchase price. Summary of Cash and Investments as of June 30, 2017 City of Chula Vista 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 54 City of Chula Vista Quarter Ended June 30, 2017 Security Type1 Market Value2 % of Portfolio Policy Limits U.S. Treasuries $58,774,423 25% 100% Federal Agencies $9,594,072 4% 100% Federal Agency CMOs $1,232,761 1% 100% Municipal Obligations $0 0% 100% Commercial Paper $8,960,982 4% 25% Negotiable CDs $21,023,702 9% 30% Corporate Notes $43,476,005 18% 30% Asset-Backed Securities $5,398,894 2% 20% Money Market Fund $1,697,603 1% 20% San Diego County Pool $88,008,059 37% 100% LAIF $1,652,884 1% $65 Million Totals $239,819,384 100% Par Value Amortized Cost 2Q17 Acrual Basis Earnings $546,117 Weighted Average Maturity (years)Fiscal Year 2016-17 Initial Earnings Forecast $2,129,483 Effective Duration (years)Fiscal Year 2016-17 Actual Earnings $2,202,334 Yield to Maturity at Cost Variance to Initial Forecast $72,851 Yield to Maturity at Market Notes: 1. End of quarter trade-date market values of portfolio holdings, excluding accrued interest. Percentages may not add to 100% due to rounding. 2. Balances held in LAIF and the San Diego County Investment Pool are not managed by PFM Asset Management LLC. 4. Yields, weighted average maturity, and effective duration exclude balances not managed by PFM Asset Management LLC. 5. Accrual earnings forecast are calculated on an amortized cost, settle basis. Projected earnings for April 2017 through June 2017 were based on portfolio holdings as of March 31, 2017, $143.9 par. Earnings for January 2017, February 2017, and March 2017 are based on actual accrual basis earnings. As current holdings mature, proceeds are reinvested in a) a maturity that reblances the portfolio near its current duration, 1.82 as of March 31, 2017. b) at a yield based on assumed maturity and US Treasury forward curve, as of April 12, 2017. Projected earnings assume callable securities trading at a premium are called at their next call date and are subsequently reinested at the assumptions noted above. We cannot gaurantee earnings forecasts, which are subject to market fluctuations, changes in cash flows, and reinvestment rates. Past performace in not indicative of future results. 1.51% Summary of Portfolio Characteristics and Key Statistics Sector Distribution Credit Quality (S&P Ratings) Maturity Distribution Key Statistics4 Earnings5 $239,552,352 $239,942,388 1.72 1.59 1.46% 3. Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, and Morgan Stanley Corporate Notes rated BBB+ by S&P and rated A by Fitch. U.S. Treasuries 25% Federal Agencies 4% Federal Agency CMOs 1% Commercial Paper 4% Negotiable CDs 9% Corporate Notes 18% Asset-Backed Securities 2% Money Market Fund 1% San Diego County Pool 37% LAIF 1% AAA 3% AA 33% A 15% BBB3 1% A-1 (Short- term) 9%Money Market Fund 1% AAAf/S1 (San Diego County) 37% Not Rated (LAIF) 1% 50% 5% 19%20% 6% 0% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Under 6 Months 6 - 12 Months 1 - 2 Years 2 - 3 Years 3 - 4 Years 4 - 5 YearsPercentage of Total Portfolio12017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 55 QUARTERLY MARKET SUMMARY For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2017 Fixed Income Management SUMMARY • Despite mixed economic data, and political and policy difficulties in the U.S., market conditions were characterized by investor optimism amid very low volatility. Bond yields were relatively well behaved during the quarter, credit spreads narrowed further, and equity markets moved higher still. • For the second time this year, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) raised the federal funds rate by 0.25%, setting a new target range of 1.00% to 1.25% for the overnight benchmark rate. The FOMC’s latest economic forecasts and “dot plot” were largely unchanged. The Federal Reserve (the Fed) is still forecasting one more rate hike this year, although market-implied probabilities show only about a 50% chance of a hike in the second half of the year. • Perhaps just as important, the Fed announced plans to gradually reduce the size of its balance sheet by decreasing its reinvestment of principal payments on existing holdings. The reduction will be $10 billion per month initially, and will increase in steps of $10 billion per month at three-month intervals, until it reaches $50 billion per month. The specific timetable is likely to be announced later this year. • U.S. equity markets had another strong quarter. In the past three months, all three major U.S. indices hit new all-time highs. The S&P 500 Index (S&P 500) returned 3.1% and is up 9.3% for the first half of the year. The Health Care and Industrial sectors were the strongest performers during the quarter. ECONOMIC SNAPSHOT • U.S. economic data released in June was below expectations. While business investment accelerated, it was partly offset by weak consumer spending and a slowdown in government spending and inventories. On the positive side, the labor market remained strong, consumer confidence remained high, business surveys were optimistic and the housing market returned to near pre-crisis levels. Second quarter gross domestic product (GDP) growth is expected to show a rebound from the weak 1.4% growth rate of the first quarter. • The labor market remained strong in the second quarter as the U.S. economy added 581,000 net new jobs, the most since the third quarter of 2016. The unemployment rate declined to a 16-year low, ending the quarter at 4.4%, but the labor force participation rate remained suppressed. At the same time, wage growth remained tepid, as average hourly earnings rose only 2.5% year-over- year (YoY) in June. The lack of wage pressures — a key driver of inflation — seems to indicate further slack remains in the labor market despite strong job gains. INTEREST RATES • Short-term (three years and under) yields ended the second quarter higher, reflecting the Fed’s June rate hike, while medium- to long-term yields declined amid subdued inflation expectations and fading prospects for near-term stimulus from tax reform or infrastructure spending. • The two-year Treasury note yield ended the quarter 13 basis points (bps) (0.13%) higher at 1.38%, while the 10-year Treasury yield fell 8 bps (0.08%) to 2.30%. The result was a notably flatter yield curve, which reduced the incentive to invest in longer maturities. • In the money market space, shorter-term Treasury yields continued to rise, reflecting the Fed’s June rate hike, but beyond 6-month maturities, yields flattened out. Yield spreads on commercial paper (CP) and certificates of deposit (CD) relative to U.S. Treasuries continued to narrow from their exceptionally wide levels of late 2016 and early 2017. CP/CD spreads now offer only modest incremental yield, similar to long-standing averages, and are considered fair value. SECTOR PERFORMANCE • U.S. Treasury indices posted positive returns in the second quarter. Returns for shorter indices were generated mostly by income, offset by modest price depreciation as yields on shorter maturities increased. Returns on longer Treasury indices were quite strong, benefitting from both income return and price appreciation from falling long-term rates and a flattening yield curve. • Federal agency yield spreads ground tighter during the quarter as demand continued to outpace supply. The sector modestly outperformed comparable- duration Treasuries for the fourth quarter in a row. • Corporate yield spreads tightened further during the quarter, reaching their narrowest levels since 2014 as the reach for yield continued globally. The sector generated strong outperformance relative to comparable-maturity Treasuries, its seventh straight quarter of outperformance. • Shorter-duration mortgage-backed securities (MBS) outperformed Treasuries, but longer-duration structures could not keep pace. MBS remains at risk from the expected reduction in the Fed’s balance sheet holdings later this year. • For the second quarter in a row, asset-backed securities (ABS) posted strong outperformance versus Treasuries. Spreads across nearly all credit sectors tightened, including ABS. PFM Asset Management LLC 22017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 56 QUARTERLY MARKET SUMMARY For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2017 Fixed Income Management Economic Snapshot Labor Market Mar '17 Jun '16 Unemployment Rate Jun'17 4.4%4.5%4.9% Change In Non-Farm Payrolls Jun'17 222,000 50,000 297,000 Average Hourly Earnings (YoY)Jun'17 2.5%2.6%2.6% Personal Income (YoY)May'17 3.5%3.9%3.4% Initial Jobless Claims (week)7/1/17 248,000 235,000 267,000 Growth Real GDP (QoQ SAAR)2017Q1 1.4%1.4%1.4% GDP Personal Consumption (QoQ SAAR) 2017Q1 1.1%1.1%4.3% Retail Sales (YoY)May'17 3.8%4.8%3.0% ISM Manufacturing Survey (month)Jun'17 57.8 57.2 52.8 Existing Home Sales SAAR (month) May'17 5.62 mil. 5.70 mil. 5.48 mil. Inflation / Prices Personal Consumption Expenditures (YoY) May'17 1.4%1.8%0.9% Consumer Price Index (YoY)May'17 1.9%2.4%1.0% Consumer Price Index Core (YoY)May'17 1.7%2.0%2.2% Crude Oil Futures (WTI, per barrel)Jun 30 $46.04 $50.60 $48.33 Gold Futures (oz.)Jun 30 $1,242 $1,247 $1,321 Latest 0 150K 300K 450K 4% 5% 6% 7% Jun '14 Dec '14 Jun '15 Dec '15 Jun '16 Dec '16 Jun '17 Unemployment Rate (left) vs. Change in Nonfarm Payrolls (right) Change In Non-Farm Payrolls Unemployment Rate -2% 0% 2% 4% 6% 3/31/14 9/30/14 3/31/15 9/30/15 3/31/16 9/30/16 3/31/17 Real GDP (QoQ) -1% 0% 1% 2% 3% Jun '14 Dec '14 Jun '15 Dec '15 Jun '16 Dec '16 Consumer Price Index CPI (YoY)Core CPI (YoY) 2 2 1 1 1. Data as of First Quarter 2017. 2. Data as of Second Quarter 2016. Note: YoY = year-over-year, QoQ = quarter over quarter, SAAR = seasonally adjusted annual rate, WTI = West Texas Intermediate crude oil. Source: Bloomberg. PFM Asset Management LLC 32017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 57 QUARTERLY MARKET SUMMARY For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2017 Fixed Income Management Source: Bloomberg. Interest Rate Overview U.S. Treasury Note Yields U.S. Treasury Yield Curve U.S. Treasury Yields Yield Curves as of 6/30/17 0% 1% 2% 3% 4%3-mo1-yr2-yr3-yr5-yr7-yr10-yr30-yrYieldMaturity June 30, 2017 March 31, 2017 June 30, 2016 Maturity Jun '17 Mar '17 Change over Quarter Jun '16 Change over Year 3-month 1.01% 0.75% 0.26% 0.26% 0.75% 1-year 1.23% 1.02% 0.21% 0.44% 0.79% 2-year 1.38% 1.26% 0.12% 0.58% 0.80% 5-year 1.89% 1.92%(0.03%)1.00% 0.89% 10-year 2.31% 2.39%(0.08%)1.47% 0.84% 30-year 2.84% 3.01%(0.17%)2.29% 0.55% 0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5%3-mo1-yr2-yr3-yr5-yr7-yr10-yr25-yr30-yrYieldMaturity U.S. Treasury Federal Agency Industrial Corporates, A Rated 0.0% 0.5% 1.0% 1.5% 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% Jun '16 Sep '16 Dec '16 Mar '17 Jun '17Yield 2-Year 5-Year 10-Year PFM Asset Management LLC 42017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 58 QUARTERLY MARKET SUMMARY For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2017 Fixed Income Management Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Indices. June 30, 2017 Duration Yield 3-month 1-year 3-years 1-3 Year Indices U.S. Treasury 1.89 1.40% 0.17%(0.11%)0.69% Federal Agency 1.78 1.48% 0.25% 0.25% 0.83% U.S. Corporates, A-AAA rated 1.95 1.95% 0.55% 1.04% 1.43% Agency MBS (0 to 3 years)2.25 1.88% 0.60% 0.35% 1.15% Taxable Municipals 1.74 2.34% 0.34% 1.20% 1.77% 1-5 Year Indices U.S. Treasury 2.69 1.54% 0.38%(0.53%)1.08% Federal Agency 2.24 1.58% 0.37% 0.06% 1.10% U.S. Corporates, A-AAA rated 2.80 2.16% 0.84% 0.99% 1.91% Agency MBS (0 to 5 years)3.33 2.32% 0.66% 0.04% 1.65% Taxable Municipals 2.65 2.41% 0.56% 0.88% 2.27% Master Indices (Maturities 1 Year or Greater) U.S. Treasury 6.36 1.91% 1.22%(2.45%)2.20% Federal Agency 3.99 1.87% 0.88%(0.35%)1.88% U.S. Corporates, A-AAA rated 7.16 2.91% 2.21% 0.98% 3.49% Agency MBS (0 to 30 years)4.69 2.76% 0.90%(0.03%)2.15% Taxable Municipals 4.18 2.86% 0.94%(0.16%)2.74% As of 6/30/17 Returns for Periods ended 6/30/17 Returns for periods greater than one year are annualized. PFM Asset Management LLC BofA Merrill Lynch Index Returns 52017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 59 QUARTERLY MARKET SUMMARY For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2017 Fixed Income Management DISCLOSURES PFM is the marketing name for a group of affiliated companies providing a range of services. All services are provided through separate agreements with each company. This material is for general information purposes only and is not intended to provide specific advice or a specific recommendation. Investment advisory services are provided by PFM Asset Management LLC which is registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. The information contained is not an offer to purchase or sell any securities. Additional applicable regulatory information is available upon request. For more information regarding PFM’s services or entities, please visit www.pfm.com. The views expressed within this material constitute the perspective and judgment of PFM Asset Management LLC at the time of distribution and are subject to change. Information is obtained from sources generally believed to be reliable and available to the public; however, PFM Asset Management LLC cannot guarantee its accuracy, completeness, or suitability. This material is for general information purposes only and is not intended to provide specific advice or recommendation. The information contained in this report is not an offer to purchase or sell any securities. © 2017 PFM Asset Management LLC. Further distribution is not permitted without prior written consent. PFM Asset Management LLC 62017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 60 For the Month Ending June 30, 2017Managed Account Detail of Securities Held CITY OF CHULA VISTA Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTrade Settle Par U.S. Treasury Bond / Note US TREASURY NOTES DTD 07/31/2013 1.375% 07/31/2018 4,503,865.50 4,515,917.76 25,809.74 4,544,648.44 07/06/1507/02/15AaaAA+ 4,500,000.00 912828VQ0 1.05 US TREASURY NOTES DTD 10/31/2011 1.750% 10/31/2018 3,916,757.47 3,929,089.90 11,483.90 3,977,008.01 08/05/1508/04/15AaaAA+ 3,895,000.00 912828RP7 1.09 US TREASURY NOTES DTD 12/02/2013 1.250% 11/30/2018 7,964,409.20 7,983,138.33 8,443.48 7,994,314.46 07/06/1507/02/15AaaAA+ 7,975,000.00 912828A34 1.18 US TREASURY NOTES DTD 01/31/2012 1.250% 01/31/2019 998,242.00 997,558.45 5,214.09 994,023.44 02/23/1502/19/15AaaAA+ 1,000,000.00 912828SD3 1.41 US TREASURY NOTES DTD 06/02/2014 1.500% 05/31/2019 8,518,929.50 8,521,819.84 10,799.18 8,543,828.13 07/06/1507/02/15AaaAA+ 8,500,000.00 912828WL0 1.36 US TREASURY NOTES DTD 10/01/2012 1.000% 09/30/2019 2,045,801.70 2,051,790.71 5,190.71 2,039,348.83 04/27/1504/23/15AaaAA+ 2,065,000.00 912828TR1 1.29 US TREASURY NOTES DTD 10/01/2012 1.000% 09/30/2019 3,021,644.15 3,025,088.15 7,666.67 3,001,867.19 05/04/1505/01/15AaaAA+ 3,050,000.00 912828TR1 1.37 US TREASURY NOTES DTD 10/31/2014 1.500% 10/31/2019 1,501,992.00 1,496,453.64 3,790.76 1,493,496.09 06/29/1506/26/15AaaAA+ 1,500,000.00 912828F62 1.60 US TREASURY NOTES DTD 10/31/2014 1.500% 10/31/2019 8,511,288.00 8,500,393.98 21,480.98 8,500,664.06 07/06/1507/02/15AaaAA+ 8,500,000.00 912828F62 1.50 US TREASURY NOTES DTD 11/30/2012 1.000% 11/30/2019 2,968,359.00 2,967,625.95 2,540.98 2,940,468.75 05/28/1505/26/15AaaAA+ 3,000,000.00 912828UB4 1.46 US TREASURY NOTES DTD 12/01/2014 1.500% 11/30/2019 3,002,814.00 3,007,476.54 3,811.48 3,009,257.81 11/29/1611/29/16AaaAA+ 3,000,000.00 912828G61 1.39 US TREASURY NOTES DTD 02/28/2013 1.250% 02/29/2020 1,192,219.20 1,197,724.79 5,013.59 1,196,296.88 10/13/1510/08/15AaaAA+ 1,200,000.00 912828UQ1 1.32 US TREASURY NOTES DTD 02/28/2013 1.250% 02/29/2020 1,192,219.20 1,197,624.14 5,013.59 1,196,156.25 10/23/1510/23/15AaaAA+ 1,200,000.00 912828UQ1 1.33 US TREASURY NOTES DTD 02/28/2013 1.250% 02/29/2020 3,025,256.22 3,018,481.73 12,721.98 3,002,774.41 11/13/1511/13/15AaaAA+ 3,045,000.00 912828UQ1 1.59 72017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 61 For the Month Ending June 30, 2017Managed Account Detail of Securities Held CITY OF CHULA VISTA Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTrade Settle Par U.S. Treasury Bond / Note US TREASURY NOTES DTD 01/31/2016 1.375% 01/31/2021 2,968,593.00 3,015,945.63 17,206.49 3,020,507.81 06/10/1606/07/16AaaAA+ 3,000,000.00 912828N89 1.22 US TREASURY NOTES DTD 03/31/2016 1.250% 03/31/2021 3,442,033.00 3,502,373.49 10,997.27 3,503,007.81 06/10/1606/07/16AaaAA+ 3,500,000.00 912828Q37 1.23 157,184.89 58,774,423.14 58,928,503.03 1.32 58,957,668.37 58,930,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total Federal Agency Collateralized Mortgage Obligation FANNIE MAE SERIES 2015-M13 ASQ2 DTD 10/01/2015 1.646% 09/01/2019 1,232,761.06 1,239,232.82 1,691.29 1,245,367.58 10/30/1510/07/15AaaAA+ 1,233,020.24 3136AQDQ0 1.08 1,691.29 1,232,761.06 1,239,232.82 1.08 1,245,367.58 1,233,020.24 Security Type Sub-Total Federal Agency Bond / Note FFCB NOTES DTD 09/21/2012 0.830% 09/21/2017 614,579.96 615,000.00 1,417.92 615,000.00 09/21/1209/21/12AaaAA+ 615,000.00 3133EAY28 0.83 FREDDIE MAC (EX-CALLABLE) BONDS DTD 12/26/2012 0.850% 12/26/2017 2,996,559.00 3,000,000.00 354.17 3,000,000.00 12/26/1212/26/12AaaAA+ 3,000,000.00 3134G32L3 0.85 FANNIE MAE (CALLABLE) BONDS DTD 12/27/2012 0.900% 12/27/2017 2,994,477.00 3,000,000.00 300.00 3,000,000.00 12/27/1212/27/12AaaAA+ 3,000,000.00 3136G14X4 0.90 FREDDIE MAC (EX-CALLABLE) BONDS DTD 05/29/2013 1.000% 05/29/2018 2,988,456.00 3,000,000.00 2,666.67 3,000,000.00 05/29/1305/29/13AaaAA+ 3,000,000.00 3134G45W4 1.00 4,738.76 9,594,071.96 9,615,000.00 0.91 9,615,000.00 9,615,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total Corporate Note MORGAN STANLEY CORP NOTES DTD 12/05/2014 1.875% 01/05/2018 550,656.15 551,160.24 5,041.67 552,849.00 09/30/1609/30/16A3BBB+ 550,000.00 61761JVM8 1.46 BRANCH BANKING & TRUST NT (CALLABLE) DTD 11/21/2012 1.450% 01/12/2018 999,486.00 1,001,128.83 6,806.94 1,003,130.00 09/13/1609/08/16A2A- 1,000,000.00 05531FAM5 1.21 CITIGROUP INC CORP NOTES DTD 05/01/2013 1.750% 05/01/2018 499,779.00 500,674.81 1,458.33 501,275.00 09/30/1609/30/16Baa1BBB+ 500,000.00 172967GS4 1.59 82017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 62 For the Month Ending June 30, 2017Managed Account Detail of Securities Held CITY OF CHULA VISTA Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTrade Settle Par Corporate Note BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY NOTES DTD 05/15/2013 1.300% 05/15/2018 424,539.73 424,610.41 705.97 423,763.25 07/27/1507/23/15Aa2AA 425,000.00 084664BW0 1.41 BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY NOTES DTD 05/15/2013 1.300% 05/15/2018 1,344,542.28 1,346,106.81 2,235.86 1,346,336.50 07/15/1507/10/15Aa2AA 1,346,000.00 084664BW0 1.29 BANK OF AMERICA BANK NOTES DTD 06/05/2015 1.750% 06/05/2018 801,061.60 800,418.94 1,011.11 801,160.00 10/23/1510/20/15A1A+ 800,000.00 06050TMC3 1.69 CHEVRON CORP GLOBAL NOTES DTD 06/24/2013 1.718% 06/24/2018 1,503,285.00 1,507,428.71 501.08 1,523,610.00 04/27/1504/23/15Aa2AA- 1,500,000.00 166764AE0 1.21 GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC NOTES DTD 07/19/2013 2.900% 07/19/2018 505,679.00 507,180.96 6,525.00 512,255.00 09/30/1609/30/16A3BBB+ 500,000.00 38147MAA3 1.52 GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC NOTES DTD 07/19/2013 2.900% 07/19/2018 986,074.05 986,459.75 12,723.75 1,004,298.75 10/28/1510/28/15A3BBB+ 975,000.00 38147MAA3 1.77 CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP NOTE DTD 09/06/2013 2.450% 09/06/2018 2,473,105.95 2,474,041.43 19,174.65 2,477,954.50 04/21/1704/19/17A3A 2,450,000.00 14912L5T4 1.61 CITIGROUP INC CORP NOTES DTD 09/26/2013 2.500% 09/26/2018 981,608.55 982,003.31 6,432.29 991,233.75 10/28/1510/28/15Baa1BBB+ 975,000.00 172967HC8 1.91 US BANCORP NOTES (CALLABLE) DTD 11/07/2013 1.950% 11/15/2018 3,015,429.00 3,009,082.92 7,475.00 3,021,840.00 08/19/1508/17/15A1A+ 3,000,000.00 91159HHE3 1.72 BANK OF NY MELLN CORP (CALLABLE) NOTES DTD 11/18/2013 2.100% 01/15/2019 1,004,426.00 1,003,321.65 9,683.33 1,007,240.00 09/21/1509/18/15A1A 1,000,000.00 06406HCP2 1.87 IBM CORP NOTE DTD 02/12/2014 1.950% 02/12/2019 1,509,160.50 1,512,232.50 11,293.75 1,528,290.00 04/27/1504/23/15A1A+ 1,500,000.00 459200HT1 1.44 TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP DTD 02/19/2016 1.700% 02/19/2019 1,531,817.64 1,529,898.91 9,537.00 1,529,816.40 02/19/1602/16/16Aa3AA- 1,530,000.00 89236TCU7 1.70 CISCO SYSTEMS INC GLOBAL NOTES DTD 03/03/2014 2.125% 03/01/2019 1,512,162.00 1,502,910.08 10,625.00 1,506,270.00 06/29/1506/26/15A1AA- 1,500,000.00 17275RAR3 2.01 92017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 63 For the Month Ending June 30, 2017Managed Account Detail of Securities Held CITY OF CHULA VISTA Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTrade Settle Par Corporate Note APPLE INC GLOBAL NOTES DTD 05/06/2014 2.100% 05/06/2019 1,514,062.50 1,505,611.73 4,812.50 1,511,475.00 06/29/1506/26/15Aa1AA+ 1,500,000.00 037833AQ3 1.89 AMERCIAN EXPRESS CREDIT CORP NOTES DTD 08/15/2014 2.250% 08/15/2019 1,008,614.00 1,002,122.94 8,500.00 1,003,820.00 09/21/1509/18/15A2A- 1,000,000.00 0258M0DP1 2.15 AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE GLOBAL NOTES DTD 09/09/2014 2.250% 08/15/2019 1,512,736.50 1,513,262.93 12,750.00 1,514,325.00 04/28/1704/25/17A1A+ 1,500,000.00 02665WAH4 1.82 GENERAL ELECTRIC CAP CORP (CALLABLE) DTD 01/09/2015 2.200% 01/09/2020 1,513,573.50 1,523,436.75 15,766.67 1,533,555.00 06/01/1605/26/16A1AA- 1,500,000.00 36962G7M0 1.56 JPMORGAN CHASE & CO (CALLABLE) DTD 01/23/2015 2.250% 01/23/2020 1,003,102.00 995,928.28 9,875.00 993,230.00 09/21/1509/18/15A3A- 1,000,000.00 46625HKA7 2.41 JPMORGAN CHASE & CO (CALLABLE) DTD 01/23/2015 2.250% 01/23/2020 1,504,653.00 1,502,640.87 14,812.50 1,504,815.00 04/27/1504/23/15A3A- 1,500,000.00 46625HKA7 2.18 WELLS FARGO & CO DTD 02/02/2015 2.150% 01/30/2020 1,002,571.00 998,800.23 9,018.06 998,000.00 09/21/1509/18/15A2A 1,000,000.00 94974BGF1 2.20 WELLS FARGO & CO DTD 02/02/2015 2.150% 01/30/2020 1,503,856.50 1,500,030.99 13,527.08 1,500,045.00 03/27/1503/26/15A2A 1,500,000.00 94974BGF1 2.15 MICROSOFT CORP NOTE DTD 02/12/2015 1.850% 02/12/2020 2,003,510.00 2,005,308.06 14,286.11 2,006,200.00 01/17/1701/13/17AaaAAA 2,000,000.00 594918AY0 1.75 BOEING COMPANY CORP NOTES DTD 07/28/2009 4.875% 02/15/2020 1,614,643.50 1,618,484.30 27,625.00 1,634,145.00 02/23/1702/22/17A2A 1,500,000.00 097023AZ8 1.78 AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORP NOTES DTD 03/13/2015 2.150% 03/13/2020 1,506,541.50 1,503,368.69 9,675.00 1,506,045.00 03/27/1503/26/15A1A+ 1,500,000.00 02665WAU5 2.06 COMCAST CORP CORP NOTES DTD 08/19/2011 5.150% 04/30/2020 1,633,470.00 1,627,309.11 13,089.58 1,642,770.00 02/23/1702/22/17A3A- 1,500,000.00 63946BAD2 2.05 AMERICAN EXP CREDIT CORP NT (CALLABLE) DTD 05/26/2015 2.375% 05/26/2020 1,513,737.00 1,490,994.78 3,463.54 1,485,135.00 06/29/1506/26/15A2A- 1,500,000.00 0258M0DT3 2.59 BNY MELLON CORP NOTE (CALLABLE) DTD 08/17/2015 2.600% 08/17/2020 1,522,161.00 1,516,836.57 14,516.67 1,525,875.00 10/09/1510/08/15A1A 1,500,000.00 06406HDD8 2.22 102017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 64 For the Month Ending June 30, 2017Managed Account Detail of Securities Held CITY OF CHULA VISTA Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTrade Settle Par Corporate Note AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CB DTD 09/24/2015 2.450% 09/24/2020 1,013,549.00 1,003,777.08 6,601.39 1,005,680.00 10/09/1510/08/15A1A+ 1,000,000.00 02665WAZ4 2.33 PEPSICO INC CORP NOTES (CALLABLE) DTD 10/14/2015 2.150% 10/14/2020 2,012,758.00 2,024,634.42 9,197.22 2,032,540.00 06/06/1606/01/16A1A+ 2,000,000.00 713448DC9 1.76 MORGAN STANLEY CORP NOTES DTD 04/21/2016 2.500% 04/21/2021 449,653.05 452,265.15 2,187.50 452,893.50 05/16/1605/11/16A3BBB+ 450,000.00 61746BEA0 2.36 300,934.55 43,476,004.50 43,423,473.14 1.84 43,581,870.65 43,001,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total Commercial Paper BANK TOKYO MITSUBISHI UFJ LTD COMM PAPER DTD 02/28/2017 0.000% 08/22/2017 2,994,633.00 2,994,366.66 0.00 2,981,041.67 02/28/1702/28/17P-1A-1 3,000,000.00 06538BVN0 1.31 CREDIT AGRICOLE CIB NY COMM PAPER DTD 02/27/2017 0.000% 08/22/2017 2,994,666.00 2,994,886.65 0.00 2,982,791.67 02/28/1702/28/17P-1A-1 3,000,000.00 22533TVN3 1.19 BNP PARIBAS NY BRANCH COMM PAPER DTD 05/23/2017 0.000% 02/16/2018 2,971,683.00 2,972,974.98 0.00 2,968,392.50 05/23/1705/23/17P-1A-1 3,000,000.00 09659CBG2 1.43 0.00 8,960,982.00 8,962,228.29 1.31 8,932,225.84 9,000,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total Certificate of Deposit BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA HOUSTON CERT DEPOS DTD 08/26/2016 1.350% 07/25/2017 3,000,276.60 3,000,000.00 34,762.50 3,000,000.00 08/26/1608/26/16P-1A-1 3,000,000.00 06417GNH7 1.35 TORONTO DOMINION BANK NY CERT DEPOS DTD 08/26/2016 1.380% 08/21/2017 3,000,895.50 3,000,000.00 35,535.00 3,000,000.00 08/26/1608/26/16P-1A-1+ 3,000,000.00 89113WHS8 1.37 CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK NY CD DTD 08/26/2016 1.390% 08/28/2017 3,001,011.00 3,000,000.00 35,792.50 3,000,000.00 08/26/1608/26/16P-1A-1 3,000,000.00 13606AY36 0.72 SKANDINAVISKA ENSKILDA BANKEN NY CD DTD 11/17/2015 1.480% 11/16/2017 2,998,695.00 3,000,000.00 27,996.67 3,000,000.00 11/17/1511/16/15Aa3A+ 3,000,000.00 83050FBG5 1.48 112017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 65 For the Month Ending June 30, 2017Managed Account Detail of Securities Held CITY OF CHULA VISTA Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTrade Settle Par Certificate of Deposit CREDIT SUISSE NEW YORK CERT DEPOS DTD 04/17/2017 1.460% 11/21/2017 3,000,825.00 3,000,000.00 9,125.00 3,000,000.00 04/17/1704/13/17P-1A-1 3,000,000.00 22549VN90 1.46 BANK OF MONTREAL CHICAGO CERT DEPOS DTD 02/09/2017 1.880% 02/07/2019 3,017,439.00 3,000,000.00 22,246.67 3,000,000.00 02/09/1702/08/17Aa3A+ 3,000,000.00 06427KRC3 1.90 SUMITOMO MITSUI BANK NY CD DTD 05/04/2017 2.050% 05/03/2019 3,004,560.00 3,000,000.00 9,737.50 3,000,000.00 05/04/1705/03/17A1A 3,000,000.00 86563YVN0 2.05 175,195.84 21,023,702.10 21,000,000.00 1.48 21,000,000.00 21,000,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total Asset-Backed Security / Collateralized Mortgage Obligation CARMX 2016-4 A2 DTD 10/26/2016 1.210% 11/15/2019 1,123,024.90 1,124,739.17 604.88 1,124,724.90 10/26/1610/19/16AaaAAA 1,124,785.86 14312QAB2 1.21 HONDA ABS 2016-1 A3 DTD 02/25/2016 1.220% 12/18/2019 748,063.20 749,936.66 330.42 749,893.43 02/25/1602/16/16NRAAA 750,000.00 43814NAC9 1.23 NISSAN ABS 2015-C A3 DTD 10/14/2015 1.370% 05/15/2020 858,502.05 859,937.20 523.64 859,890.52 10/14/1510/06/15AaaNR 860,000.00 65478AAD5 1.38 ALLY ABS 2016-3 A3 DTD 05/31/2016 1.440% 08/15/2020 529,410.38 529,962.53 339.20 529,948.54 05/31/1605/24/16AaaAAA 530,000.00 02007LAC6 1.44 BANK OF AMER CREDIT CARD TR 2015-A2 DTD 04/29/2015 1.360% 09/15/2020 999,218.00 1,000,889.58 604.44 1,001,328.12 10/28/1510/26/15AaaAAA 1,000,000.00 05522RCU0 1.30 HAROT 2016-4 A3 DTD 10/25/2016 1.210% 12/18/2020 1,140,675.11 1,149,939.88 502.49 1,149,925.37 10/25/1610/18/16NRAAA 1,150,000.00 43814RAC0 1.04 2,905.07 5,398,893.64 5,415,405.02 1.24 5,415,710.88 5,414,785.86 Security Type Sub-Total 148,193,806.10 148,747,843.32 1.46 642,650.40 148,583,842.30 148,460,838.40 Managed Account Sub-Total $148,193,806.10 $148,747,843.32 $642,650.40 $148,583,842.30 $148,460,838.40 1.46% $149,103,488.80 $642,650.40 Total Investments Accrued Interest Securities Sub-Total 122017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 66 For the Month Ending April 30, 2017Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest CITY OF CHULA VISTA Transaction Type Trade CUSIPSecurity DescriptionSettle Par Proceeds Principal Accrued Interest Total Cost Realized G/L Realized G/L Sale Amort Cost Method BUY 04/17/17 CREDIT SUISSE NEW YORK CERT DEPOS DTD 04/17/2017 1.460% 11/21/2017 22549VN90 (3,000,000.00) 0.00 (3,000,000.00) 3,000,000.00 04/13/17 04/21/17 CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP NOTE DTD 09/06/2013 2.450% 09/06/2018 14912L5T4 (2,477,954.50)(7,503.13)(2,485,457.63) 2,450,000.00 04/19/17 04/28/17 AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE GLOBAL NOTES DTD 09/09/2014 2.250% 08/15/2019 02665WAH4 (1,514,325.00)(6,843.75)(1,521,168.75) 1,500,000.00 04/25/17 (14,346.88) (7,006,626.38)(6,992,279.50) 6,950,000.00 Transaction Type Sub-Total INTEREST 04/25/17 FANNIE MAE SERIES 2015-M13 ASQ2 DTD 10/01/2015 1.646% 09/01/2019 3136AQDQ0 0.00 1,859.93 1,859.93 1,355,961.74 04/01/17 04/03/17 MONEY MARKET FUND MONEY0002 0.00 7.99 7.99 0.00 04/03/17 04/04/17 MONEY MARKET FUND MONEY0002 0.00 1,735.22 1,735.22 0.00 04/04/17 04/14/17 PEPSICO INC CORP NOTES (CALLABLE) DTD 10/14/2015 2.150% 10/14/2020 713448DC9 0.00 21,500.00 21,500.00 2,000,000.00 04/14/17 04/15/17 ALLY ABS 2016-3 A3 DTD 05/31/2016 1.440% 08/15/2020 02007LAC6 0.00 636.00 636.00 530,000.00 04/15/17 04/15/17 CARMX 2016-4 A2 DTD 10/26/2016 1.210% 11/15/2019 14312QAB2 0.00 1,250.33 1,250.33 1,240,000.00 04/15/17 04/15/17 NISSAN ABS 2015-C A3 DTD 10/14/2015 1.370% 05/15/2020 65478AAD5 0.00 981.83 981.83 860,000.00 04/15/17 04/15/17 BANK OF AMER CREDIT CARD TR 2015-A2 DTD 04/29/2015 1.360% 09/15/2020 05522RCU0 0.00 1,133.33 1,133.33 1,000,000.00 04/15/17 04/18/17 HONDA ABS 2016-1 A3 DTD 02/25/2016 1.220% 12/18/2019 43814NAC9 0.00 762.50 762.50 750,000.00 04/18/17 04/18/17 HAROT 2016-4 A3 DTD 10/25/2016 1.210% 12/18/2020 43814RAC0 0.00 1,159.58 1,159.58 1,150,000.00 04/18/17 04/21/17 RABOBANK NEDERLAND NV CERT DEPOS DTD 04/27/2015 1.070% 04/21/2017 21684BXH2 0.00 12,840.00 12,840.00 2,400,000.00 04/21/17 132017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 67 For the Month Ending April 30, 2017Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest CITY OF CHULA VISTA Transaction Type Trade CUSIPSecurity DescriptionSettle Par Proceeds Principal Accrued Interest Total Cost Realized G/L Realized G/L Sale Amort Cost Method INTEREST 04/21/17 MORGAN STANLEY CORP NOTES DTD 04/21/2016 2.500% 04/21/2021 61746BEA0 0.00 5,625.00 5,625.00 450,000.00 04/21/17 04/30/17 US TREASURY NOTES DTD 10/31/2014 1.500% 10/31/2019 912828F62 0.00 63,750.00 63,750.00 8,500,000.00 04/30/17 04/30/17 US TREASURY NOTES DTD 10/31/2014 1.500% 10/31/2019 912828F62 0.00 11,250.00 11,250.00 1,500,000.00 04/30/17 04/30/17 COMCAST CORP CORP NOTES DTD 08/19/2011 5.150% 04/30/2020 63946BAD2 0.00 38,625.00 38,625.00 1,500,000.00 04/30/17 04/30/17 US TREASURY NOTES DTD 10/31/2011 1.750% 10/31/2018 912828RP7 0.00 34,081.25 34,081.25 3,895,000.00 04/30/17 197,197.96 197,197.96 0.00 27,130,961.74 Transaction Type Sub-Total MATURITY 04/21/17 RABOBANK NEDERLAND NV CERT DEPOS DTD 04/27/2015 1.070% 04/21/2017 21684BXH2 2,400,000.00 0.00 2,400,000.00 0.00 0.00 2,400,000.00 04/21/17 04/25/17 NORINCHUKIN BANK NY CERT DEPOS DTD 10/27/2016 1.260% 04/25/2017 65602UFZ6 3,000,000.00 18,900.00 3,018,900.00 (434.86) 0.00 3,000,000.00 04/25/17 18,900.00 0.00 (434.86) 5,418,900.00 5,400,000.00 5,400,000.00 Transaction Type Sub-Total PAYDOWNS 04/25/17 FANNIE MAE SERIES 2015-M13 ASQ2 DTD 10/01/2015 1.646% 09/01/2019 3136AQDQ0 2,173.62 0.00 2,173.62 (21.77) 0.00 2,173.62 04/01/17 0.00 0.00 (21.77) 2,173.62 2,173.62 2,173.62 Transaction Type Sub-Total (1,590,105.88) 201,751.08 (1,388,354.80) (456.63) 0.00 Managed Account Sub-Total Total Security Transactions ($456.63)($1,388,354.80)$201,751.08 ($1,590,105.88)$0.00 142017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 68 For the Month Ending May 31, 2017Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest CITY OF CHULA VISTA Transaction Type Trade CUSIPSecurity DescriptionSettle Par Proceeds Principal Accrued Interest Total Cost Realized G/L Realized G/L Sale Amort Cost Method BUY 05/04/17 SUMITOMO MITSUI BANK NY CD DTD 05/04/2017 2.050% 05/03/2019 86563YVN0 (3,000,000.00) 0.00 (3,000,000.00) 3,000,000.00 05/03/17 05/23/17 BNP PARIBAS NY BRANCH COMM PAPER DTD 05/23/2017 0.000% 02/16/2018 09659CBG2 (2,968,392.50) 0.00 (2,968,392.50) 3,000,000.00 05/23/17 0.00 (5,968,392.50)(5,968,392.50) 6,000,000.00 Transaction Type Sub-Total INTEREST 05/01/17 MONEY MARKET FUND MONEY0002 0.00 7.55 7.55 0.00 05/01/17 05/01/17 CITIGROUP INC CORP NOTES DTD 05/01/2013 1.750% 05/01/2018 172967GS4 0.00 4,375.00 4,375.00 500,000.00 05/01/17 05/25/17 FANNIE MAE SERIES 2015-M13 ASQ2 DTD 10/01/2015 1.646% 09/01/2019 3136AQDQ0 0.00 2,603.28 2,603.28 1,353,788.12 05/01/17 05/02/17 MONEY MARKET FUND MONEY0002 0.00 1,815.97 1,815.97 0.00 05/02/17 05/06/17 APPLE INC GLOBAL NOTES DTD 05/06/2014 2.100% 05/06/2019 037833AQ3 0.00 15,750.00 15,750.00 1,500,000.00 05/06/17 05/15/17 BANK OF AMER CREDIT CARD TR 2015-A2 DTD 04/29/2015 1.360% 09/15/2020 05522RCU0 0.00 1,133.33 1,133.33 1,000,000.00 05/15/17 05/15/17 BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY NOTES DTD 05/15/2013 1.300% 05/15/2018 084664BW0 0.00 8,749.00 8,749.00 1,346,000.00 05/15/17 05/15/17 BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY NOTES DTD 05/15/2013 1.300% 05/15/2018 084664BW0 0.00 2,762.50 2,762.50 425,000.00 05/15/17 05/15/17 CARMX 2016-4 A2 DTD 10/26/2016 1.210% 11/15/2019 14312QAB2 0.00 1,250.33 1,250.33 1,240,000.00 05/15/17 05/15/17 NISSAN ABS 2015-C A3 DTD 10/14/2015 1.370% 05/15/2020 65478AAD5 0.00 981.83 981.83 860,000.00 05/15/17 05/15/17 US BANCORP NOTES (CALLABLE) DTD 11/07/2013 1.950% 11/15/2018 91159HHE3 0.00 29,250.00 29,250.00 3,000,000.00 05/15/17 05/15/17 ALLY ABS 2016-3 A3 DTD 05/31/2016 1.440% 08/15/2020 02007LAC6 0.00 636.00 636.00 530,000.00 05/15/17 05/18/17 HONDA ABS 2016-1 A3 DTD 02/25/2016 1.220% 12/18/2019 43814NAC9 0.00 762.50 762.50 750,000.00 05/18/17 05/18/17 HAROT 2016-4 A3 DTD 10/25/2016 1.210% 12/18/2020 43814RAC0 0.00 1,159.58 1,159.58 1,150,000.00 05/18/17 152017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 69 For the Month Ending May 31, 2017Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest CITY OF CHULA VISTA Transaction Type Trade CUSIPSecurity DescriptionSettle Par Proceeds Principal Accrued Interest Total Cost Realized G/L Realized G/L Sale Amort Cost Method INTEREST 05/26/17 AMERICAN EXP CREDIT CORP NT (CALLABLE) DTD 05/26/2015 2.375% 05/26/2020 0258M0DT3 0.00 17,812.50 17,812.50 1,500,000.00 05/26/17 05/29/17 FREDDIE MAC (EX-CALLABLE) BONDS DTD 05/29/2013 1.000% 05/29/2018 3134G45W4 0.00 15,000.00 15,000.00 3,000,000.00 05/29/17 05/31/17 US TREASURY NOTES DTD 12/01/2014 1.500% 11/30/2019 912828G61 0.00 22,500.00 22,500.00 3,000,000.00 05/31/17 05/31/17 US TREASURY NOTES DTD 12/02/2013 1.250% 11/30/2018 912828A34 0.00 49,843.75 49,843.75 7,975,000.00 05/31/17 05/31/17 US TREASURY NOTES DTD 11/30/2012 1.000% 11/30/2019 912828UB4 0.00 15,000.00 15,000.00 3,000,000.00 05/31/17 05/31/17 US TREASURY NOTES DTD 06/02/2014 1.500% 05/31/2019 912828WL0 0.00 63,750.00 63,750.00 8,500,000.00 05/31/17 255,143.12 255,143.12 0.00 40,629,788.12 Transaction Type Sub-Total MATURITY 05/23/17 BNP PARIBAS NY BRANCH COMM PAPER -- 0.000% 05/23/2017 09659BSP6 3,000,000.00 0.00 3,000,000.00 30,375.00 0.00 3,000,000.00 05/23/17 0.00 0.00 30,375.00 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 Transaction Type Sub-Total PAYDOWNS 05/25/17 FANNIE MAE SERIES 2015-M13 ASQ2 DTD 10/01/2015 1.646% 09/01/2019 3136AQDQ0 83,240.79 0.00 83,240.79 (833.56) 0.00 83,240.79 05/01/17 05/15/17 CARMX 2016-4 A2 DTD 10/26/2016 1.210% 11/15/2019 14312QAB2 18,365.02 0.00 18,365.02 1.00 0.00 18,365.02 05/15/17 0.00 0.00 (832.56) 101,605.81 101,605.81 101,605.81 Transaction Type Sub-Total (2,866,786.69) 255,143.12 (2,611,643.57) 29,542.44 0.00 Managed Account Sub-Total Total Security Transactions $29,542.44 ($2,611,643.57)$255,143.12 ($2,866,786.69)$0.00 162017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 70 For the Month Ending June 30, 2017Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest CITY OF CHULA VISTA Transaction Type Trade CUSIPSecurity DescriptionSettle Par Proceeds Principal Accrued Interest Total Cost Realized G/L Realized G/L Sale Amort Cost Method INTEREST 06/01/17 MONEY MARKET FUND MONEY0002 0.00 10.11 10.11 0.00 06/01/17 06/25/17 FANNIE MAE SERIES 2015-M13 ASQ2 DTD 10/01/2015 1.646% 09/01/2019 3136AQDQ0 0.00 2,270.62 2,270.62 1,270,547.33 06/01/17 06/02/17 MONEY MARKET FUND MONEY0002 0.00 165.98 165.98 0.00 06/02/17 06/05/17 BANK OF AMERICA BANK NOTES DTD 06/05/2015 1.750% 06/05/2018 06050TMC3 0.00 7,000.00 7,000.00 800,000.00 06/05/17 06/15/17 CARMX 2016-4 A2 DTD 10/26/2016 1.210% 11/15/2019 14312QAB2 0.00 1,231.82 1,231.82 1,221,634.98 06/15/17 06/15/17 NISSAN ABS 2015-C A3 DTD 10/14/2015 1.370% 05/15/2020 65478AAD5 0.00 981.83 981.83 860,000.00 06/15/17 06/15/17 BANK OF AMER CREDIT CARD TR 2015-A2 DTD 04/29/2015 1.360% 09/15/2020 05522RCU0 0.00 1,133.33 1,133.33 1,000,000.00 06/15/17 06/15/17 ALLY ABS 2016-3 A3 DTD 05/31/2016 1.440% 08/15/2020 02007LAC6 0.00 636.00 636.00 530,000.00 06/15/17 06/18/17 HAROT 2016-4 A3 DTD 10/25/2016 1.210% 12/18/2020 43814RAC0 0.00 1,159.58 1,159.58 1,150,000.00 06/18/17 06/18/17 HONDA ABS 2016-1 A3 DTD 02/25/2016 1.220% 12/18/2019 43814NAC9 0.00 762.50 762.50 750,000.00 06/18/17 06/24/17 CHEVRON CORP GLOBAL NOTES DTD 06/24/2013 1.718% 06/24/2018 166764AE0 0.00 12,885.00 12,885.00 1,500,000.00 06/24/17 06/26/17 FREDDIE MAC (EX-CALLABLE) BONDS DTD 12/26/2012 0.850% 12/26/2017 3134G32L3 0.00 12,750.00 12,750.00 3,000,000.00 06/26/17 06/27/17 FANNIE MAE (CALLABLE) BONDS DTD 12/27/2012 0.900% 12/27/2017 3136G14X4 0.00 13,500.00 13,500.00 3,000,000.00 06/27/17 54,486.77 54,486.77 0.00 15,082,182.31 Transaction Type Sub-Total PAYDOWNS 06/25/17 FANNIE MAE SERIES 2015-M13 ASQ2 DTD 10/01/2015 1.646% 09/01/2019 3136AQDQ0 37,527.09 0.00 37,527.09 (375.79) 0.00 37,527.09 06/01/17 06/15/17 CARMX 2016-4 A2 DTD 10/26/2016 1.210% 11/15/2019 14312QAB2 96,849.12 0.00 96,849.12 5.25 0.00 96,849.12 06/15/17 0.00 0.00 (370.54) 134,376.21 134,376.21 134,376.21 Transaction Type Sub-Total 172017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 71 For the Month Ending June 30, 2017Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest CITY OF CHULA VISTA Transaction Type Trade CUSIPSecurity DescriptionSettle Par Proceeds Principal Accrued Interest Total Cost Realized G/L Realized G/L Sale Amort Cost Method 134,376.21 54,486.77 188,862.98 (370.54) 0.00 Managed Account Sub-Total Total Security Transactions ($370.54)$188,862.98 $54,486.77 $134,376.21 $0.00 182017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 72 City of Chula Vista Staff Report File#:17-0334, Item#: 5. A. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AUTHORIZING INVESTMENT OF MONIES IN THE LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND (LAIF) B. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL FINANCING AUTHORITY AUTHORIZING INVESTMENT OF MONIES IN THE LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND (LAIF) RECOMMENDED ACTION Council adopt resolution A and Authority adopt resolution B. SUMMARY The Local Agency Investment Fund is established in the State Treasury under Government Code section 16429.1 et. seq. for the deposit of money of a local agency for purposes of investment by the State Treasurer. The deposit and withdrawal of money in the Local Agency Investment Fund in accordance with Government Code section 16429.1 et. seq. for the purpose of investment of monies is in the best interest of the City of Chula Vista and the Chula Vista Municipal Financing Authority. These investments are in accordance with the City’s Investment Policy goal to enhance the economic condition of the City while ensuring the safety of funds invested. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Environmental Notice The activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required. Environmental Determination The Director of Development Services has reviewed the proposed activity for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines because it will not result in a physical change in the environment; therefore, pursuant to Section 15060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Thus, no environmental review is required. BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Not Applicable DISCUSSION Resolution number 1977-8507 was approved by Chula Vista City Council on February 15, 1977 and was intended to establish an Investment account with the Office of the California State Treasurer Local Agency Investment Fund. This resolution was approved in accordance with the City’s Investment Policy goals and guidelines and requires updating in order to include current official City of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 1 of 3 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 73 File#:17-0334, Item#: 5. Investment Policy goals and guidelines and requires updating in order to include current official names. The goal of investing in the Local Agency Investment Fund is to enhance the economic condition of the City while ensuring the safety of funds invested. The Local Agency Fund is included in the list of investment instruments available under the relevant California Government Code sections, 53600 et seq. and 53635 mentioned in the City’s Investment Policy. Each investment transaction is made in the context of first ensuring the "safety" of principal, second, investing only for that timeframe that the cash is not needed for operational purposes ("liquidity"), and last seeking the highest return possible ("yield") provided that the first two factors are met. While the Government Code section mentioned in Resolution 1977-8507 is still current, this resolution was adopted under the City of Chula Vista only. Investing monies currently designated as reserves for current City Debt (issued under the Chula Vista Municipal Financing Authority) requires that the Chula Vista Municipal Financing Authority adopt a resolution approving investment in the Local Agency Investment Fund under its own name. It is also necessary to update the list of City Officials authorized to order deposit or withdrawal of monies in the Local Agency Investment Fund under Resolution 1977-8507. The total cash in reserve held by Trustee US Bank (qualified for Investment in the Local Agency Investment Fund) as of July 31, 2017 was $12,014,441.00. DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT Not Applicable - Not Site-Specific Staff has reviewed the decision contemplated by this action and has determined that it is not site- specific and consequently, the 500-foot rule found in California Code of Regulations Title 2, section 18702.2(a)(11), is not applicable to this decision for purposes of determining a disqualifying real property-related financial conflict of interest under the Political Reform Act (Cal. Gov't Code § 87100, et seq.). Staff is not independently aware, and has not been informed by any City Council member, or Director of the Financing Authority, of any other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter. LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS The City’s Strategic Plan has five major goals: Operational Excellence, Economic Vitality, Healthy Community, Strong and Secure Neighborhoods and a Connected Community. The Investment of monies in the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) supports the Economic Vitality goal as it seeks to obtain reasonable interest yields to assist in lowering economic barriers to new growth. CURRENT YEAR FISCAL IMPACT The City earned an average daily interest rate of 0.20% on Reserve Funds of Bonded CFD’s (Community Facilities Districts). This Interest rate was earned through investments in Money Market Accounts during the period of July 01, 2017 through July 31, 2017. In contrast, the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF), as of August 18, 2017, is offering a daily interest rate of 1.09%. This investment would result in an estimated increase in interest income of 0.89% or $106,928.53 (estimated $24,028.88 to be earned in FY18 through Investment in Money Market Accounts City of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 2 of 3 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 74 File#:17-0334, Item#: 5. compared to an estimated $130,957.41 to be earned through Investment in LAIF). ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT Through investments in LAIF, the City’s bonded CFD’s would continue to receive increased Interest Income from the higher interest rates offered by the Local Agency Investment Fund. ATTACHMENTS Resolution - City of Chula Vista Resolution - Chula Vista Municipal Financing Authority Staff Contact: David Bilby, Director of Finance/Treasurer City of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 3 of 3 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 75 City of Chula Vista Staff Report File#:17-0361, Item#: 6. A. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING AN OFFER TO PURCHASE CITY-OWNED LAND BY CALTRANS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE I-805 EXPRESS LANES AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A RIGHT-OF- WAY CONTRACT AND GRANT DEED B. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA DECLARING A CITY-OWNED PARCEL LOCATED SOUTH OF AND ADJACENT TO 150 BONITA ROAD AS EXCESS LAND, ACCEPTING AN OFFER FROM SILVERGATE DEVELOPMENT TO PURCHASE THE LAND, AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A LAND SALE CONTRACT AND GRANT DEED C. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA DECLARING A CITY-OWNED PARCEL LOCATED NORTH OF EASTLAKE PARKWAY AND WEST OF STATE ROUTE 125 EXCESS LAND, ACCEPTING AN OFFER FROM GARDENLIFE-SALVA, LLC. TO PURCHASE THE LAND, AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A LAND SALE CONTRACT AND GRANT DEED D. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING A PURCHASE OPTION AGREEMENT TO SELL CITY-OWNED LAND NORTH OF E STREET AND WEST OF I-5 TO LAND DEVELOPERS & ASSOCIATES FOR USE IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF ADJACENT LAND E. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/2018 TO APPROPRIATE $500,000 FROM THE SALE OF EXCESS PROPERTIES FOR THE DEMOLITION OF CITY- OWNED PROPERTY LOCATED AT 707 F STREET (4/5 VOTE REQUIRED) RECOMMENDED ACTION Council adopt the resolutions. SUMMARY The City has received multiple offers to purchase city owned land as more thoroughly described below. All offers to purchase presented either an appraisal or staff prepared a comparable analysis of recent real estate transactions to determine value. Staff recommends the disposition of the below mentioned properties because these properties are not needed for city purposes. The disposition of these properties will support right of way improvements on interstate 805 (CalTrans), facilitate the development of in fill housing on a vacant parcel located south of E Street and west of I-805 (Silvergate), establish an agricultural farm along the SR-125 (Gardenlife) and facilitate the City of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 1 of 5 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 79 File#:17-0361, Item#: 6. (Silvergate), establish an agricultural farm along the SR-125 (Gardenlife) and facilitate the development of a new hotel on the Chula Vista Bayfront (LDA). In addition, the funds are recommended to be appropriated to a new capital improvement project (CIP) that would remove the improvements at the city’s former corporation yard and prepare the site for solicitation of development for high density transit oriented uses (residential, hotel and retail) which is anticipated to go out as a Request for Proposal (RFP) in 2018. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Environmental Notice The Project qualifies for a Class 12 Categorical Exemption pursuant to Section 15312 (Surplus Government Property Sales) of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines. Environmental Determination The Director of Development Services has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the project qualifies for a Class 12 Categorical Exemption pursuant to Section 15312 (Surplus Government Property Sales) of the State CEQA Guidelines. Thus, no further environmental review is required. BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Not Applicable DISCUSSION The City has received multiple offers to purchase city owned land as more thoroughly described below. All offers to purchase presented either an appraisal or staff prepared a comparable analysis of recent real estate transactions to determine value. Staff recommends the disposition of the below mentioned properties because these properties are not needed for city purposes. Caltrans Sale CALTRANS is currently preparing to construct the I-805 South Express Lane Project. In order to complete construction of this project it is necessary for CALTRANS to acquire a portion of City owned land located at the northwest corner of H Street and I-805 (Exhibit “A”). CALTRANS has made an offer to the City in the amount of $132,000 to purchase the needed 0.70 acres as well as a 0.46 acre Temporary Construction Easement that will expire at the end of 2020. The proposed area will be used to reconstruct the shoulders of I-805 approaching H Street to accommodate the widening needed to construct the new HOV and express lanes. Staff has reviewed the appraisal that is the basis of the State’s offer and determined that the report accurately reflects the value of the rights sought. While we are entitled to secure our own appraisal at CALTRANS’ expense (up to $5,000) it was determined that an additional appraisal would not produce a higher value than currently offered. Further, the land to be acquired is currently vacant and not necessary for current or future City operations. Silvergate Sale City of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 2 of 5 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 80 File#:17-0361, Item#: 6. The City currently owns a vacant parcel of land located adjacent to and immediately south of 150 Bonita Road ( Exhibit “B”). This parcel is currently shown on City mapping as a portion of Vista Drive although it has never been dedicated for street use. The property was a remnant left after the construction of State Route 805 and was acquired by the City at no charge. It is approximately 0.56 acres in size and is unimproved except for asphalt paving which is in poor condition. The City has no current of future use for this parcel. Silvergate Development is currently processing a multi-family development south of and adjacent to the City land. In order to provide additional parking for their project they have made an offer to purchase the land from the City. The offer is in the amount of $225,000 with escrow to close upon issuance of grading permits or building permits for the project, but in no case later than June 30, 2018. Staff has reviewed the offer, performed a comparative land sale’s analysis and has determined the value to be appropriate for this parcel and recommends that Council accept the offer and approve the sale. Gardenlife-Salva Sale The City currently owns a vacant parcel on the north side of Eastlake Parkway and immediately west of State Route 125 (Exhibit “C”). The property was a remnant left after the construction of State Route 125 and was acquired by the City at no charge. It is approximately 5.71 acres in size, has irregular topography and is unimproved. The western 100 feet of the property is encumbered with an SDG&E easement which prohibits structures. Current zoning limits uses to agricultural, recreational and open space. The City has been marketing the site for sale for approximately five years and recently received an offer to purchase from Gardenlife-Salva. The City has an existing lease for a cell phone tower attachment on the SDG&E tower that is in the first year of a five year term. The proposed offer is $75,000 dollars for the land and an additional $81,173 dollars to buy out the remaining four years of the cell site lease ($156,173 total). Staff has reviewed the appraisal and lease acquisition offer and determined the value to appropriate for this parcel and recommends that Council accept the offer and approve the sale. LDA Option In February of 2015 Land Developers & Associates (LDA) purchased two parcels owned by the successor to the Chula Vista Redevelopment Agency. These parcels are located north of E Street immediately adjacent to I-5. Directly to the west and abutting these parcels is a strip of land owned by the City that was at one time the northerly prolongation of Bay Boulevard (Exhibit “D”). LDA has requested an option to purchase this parcel to facilitate of a new hotel on the two parcels they acquired from the former Redevelopment Agency. LDA has offered $25,000 for this land and two hundred dollars $200 dollars to secure the option. The option payment is payable upon execution of this Option Agreement. Given that this parcel is not independently developable and the City has no current or contemplated future use for this land, staff recommends disposing of this property. Further, the parcel, once purchased will generate property tax revenue and help to facilitate the development of a new hotel bringing jobs and additional tax revenue to the City. The option is proposed to allow LDA the time necessary to obtain their entitlements for their development. The option provides LDA the exclusive right to purchase the city property but only after receiving their approvals for development of a hotel on the sites. The option would be open for aCity of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 3 of 5 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 81 File#:17-0361, Item#: 6. receiving their approvals for development of a hotel on the sites. The option would be open for a period of five years at the proposed purchase price. Capital Improvement Project (CIP) The City owns approximately 6 acres of property (707 F Street) located immediately adjacent to the E Street Trolley Station that is zoned for high density mixed use development (Exhibit “E”). The property previously served as the City maintenance facility and has fallen into disrepair. It has become an attractive nuisance for the homeless and has experienced numerous instances of graffiti and petty crime. The removal of the improvements will prepare the property for redevelopment in the near future. Cleaning up the site will enhance its marketability and eliminate the attractive nuisance that it has become. After removal of the improvements it is staff’s intention to solicit Request for Proposals (RFP) for the development of the property. The marketability of the property will be greatly enhanced by the removal of the improvements along with continued progress on the implementation of the Chula Vista Bay Front Master Plan. The proposed CIP will allow staff to prepare a hazardous materials abatement report, prepare the demolition bid specifications and remove the improvements. The E Street Transit Oriented Development site represents a unique opportunity for the City to utilize its real estate holdings to increase revenue and job growth in the City. The site has the highest density allowed in Western Chula Vista and allows for heights of up to 210 feet with a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) equal to that of densities found in Downtown San Diego. The value of the property will be realized through a competitive solicitation process (RFP) seeking the development of hotel(s), residential and/or commercial uses. Because each land use will generate a different residual land value and/or leasehold value it is difficult to provide an estimate on the return for the property. Recently, the City received two unsolicited offers to purchase the property that were above recent comparable land sales, however, these offers were not accepted. City staff will prepare an RFP for the property in 2018 that will seek to maximize the long term financial return to the City and create an opportunity for additional job growth. DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT Staff has reviewed the property holdings of the City Council members and has found no property holdings within 500 feet of the boundaries of the properties which are the subject of this action. Consequently, these items do not present a disqualifying real property-related financial conflict of interest under California Code of Regulations Title 2, section 18702.2(a)(11), for purposes of the Political Reform Act (Cal. Gov’t Code §87100,et seq.). Staff is not independently aware, and has not been informed by any City Council member, of any other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter. LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS The City’s Strategic Plan has five major goals: Operational Excellence, Economic Vitality, Healthy Community, Strong and Secure Neighborhoods and a Connected Community. The actions proposed in this agenda support the Economic Vitality goals of the City. City of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 4 of 5 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 82 File#:17-0361, Item#: 6. CURRENT YEAR FISCAL IMPACT There will be no current year fiscal impact to the general funds because these sale proceeds are unanticipated one-time revenues and are being applied to offset the cost of a new capital improvement project. ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT The on-going fiscal impact to the City will be increased property tax revenue for sites sold to private parties and Transit Oriented Tax (TOT) revenue received upon completion of the LDA hotel project. The E Street TOD site on-going fiscal impact was not evaluated as part of this report but will be analyzed prior to the issuance of an RFP for the property. ATTACHMENTS 1. CALTRANS Right-of-Way Deed Map 2. CALTRANS Right-of-way Contract 3. Silvergate Agreement 4. Gardenlife-Salva Agreement 5. LDA Purchase Option Agreement Staff Contact:Rick Ryals, Real Property Manager City of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 5 of 5 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 83 RESOLUTION NO. __________ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING AN OFFER TO PURCHASE CITY OWNED LAND BY CALTRANS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE I-805 EXPRESS LANES AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A RIGHT OF WAY CONTRACT AND GRANT DEED WHEREAS, the City of Chula Vista owns a property currently designated as San Diego County Assessor’s Parcel Number 574-030-08, said parcel being located adjacent to and abutting I-805 at H Street; and WHEREAS, The California Department of Transportation,(CALTRANS) has presented the City with an offer in the amount of $132,000 to purchase 1.27 acres of said property as well as a Temporary Construction Easement over an additional 2.73 acres; and WHEREAS, said acquisition is necessary for the construction of the I-805 South Express Lanes Project; and WHEREAS, these acquisition parcels are not needed for current of future City uses; and WHEREAS, said project will provide needed infrastructure for the benefit of the City, vehicular traffic and rapid transit. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, that it accepts the offer to purchase a portion of the herein referenced parcel and the herein referenced Temporary Construction Easement and authorizes the execution of all necessary documents. Presented by Approved as to form by Eric C. Crockett Glen R. Googins Director of Economic Development City Attorney 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 84 RESOLUTION NO. __________ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA DECLARING A CITY OWNED PARCEL LOCATED SOUTH OF AND ADJACENT TO 150 BONITA ROAD AS EXCESS LAND AND ACCEPTING AN OFFER FROM SILVERGATE DEVELOPMENT TO PURCHASE THE LAND AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A LAND SALE CONTRACT AND GRANT DEED WHEREAS, the City of Chula Vista owns a vacant 0.56 acre parcel located adjacent to and immediately south of 150 Bonita Road; and WHEREAS, Silvergate Development has presented the City with an offer in the amount of $225,000 to purchase said parcel for use as parking for a project they are developing abutting the City land; and WHEREAS, the City has provided notification that the parcel is to be considered excess property and offered for sale to all required parties as set forth in Section ___________ of the __________Code; and WHEREAS, these City parcel is not needed for current of future City uses; and WHEREAS, said sale will generate revenue for the City from unused and unneeded asset, while helping facilitate local development. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, that it hereby declares the subject parcel as shown on a map thereof attached hereto as Exhibit “A”, excess land and accepts the offer to purchase the herein referenced parcel and authorizes the execution of all necessary documents. Presented by Approved as to form by Eric C. Crockett Glen R. Googins Director of Economic Development City Attorney 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 85 RESOLUTION NO. __________ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA DECLARING A CITY OWNED PARCEL LOCATED NORTH OF EASTLAKE PARKWAY AND WEST OF STATE ROUTE 125 EXCESS LAND AND ACCEPTING AN OFFER FROM GARDENLIFE-SALVA, LLC. TO PURCHASE THE LAND AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A LAND SALE CONTRACT AND GRANT DEED WHEREAS, the City of Chula Vista owns a vacant parcel located north of Eastlake Parkway and west of State Route 125; and WHEREAS, Gardenlife-Salva has presented the City with an offer in the amount of $156,173 to purchase said parcel for agricultural and other uses; and WHEREAS, the City has provided notification that the parcel is to be considered excess property and offered for sale to all required parties as set forth in Section ___________ of the __________Code; and WHEREAS, these City parcel is not needed for current of future City uses; and WHEREAS, said sale will generate revenue for the City from unused and unneeded asset, while helping facilitate local development. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, that it hereby declares the subject parcel as shown on a map thereof attached hereto as Exhibit “A”, excess land and accepts the offer to purchase the herein referenced parcel and authorizes the execution of all necessary documents. Presented by Approved as to form by Eric C. Crockett Glen R. Googins Director of Economic Development City Attorney 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 86 RESOLUTION NO. __________ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING A PURCHASE OPTION AGREEMENT TO SELL CITY-OWNED LAND NORTH OF E STREET AND WEST OF I-5 TO LAND DEVELOPERS & ASSOCIATES FOR USE IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF ADJACENT LAND WHEREAS, Land Developers & Associates Corporation (LDA) is the owner of two parcels of land currently identified as San Diego County Assessor’s Parcel No.’s 565-310-09 and 565-310-25, said land being located north of E Street and adjacent to Interstate 5; and WHEREAS, The City of Chula Vista (City) is the owner of a strip of land immediately adjacent to and abutting LDA’s land which LDA desires to purchase this land for the use in the development of their land; and WHEREAS, City has no current or anticipated future use for said strip of land and has determined that said lease is an appropriate utilization of the land; and WHEREAS, LDA will not require said land until their property is ready to be developed and therefor has requested an option to purchase at this time. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, that it approves the Purchase Option Agreement with Land Developers & Associates, Inc. in the form presented, with minor modifications as may be required or approved by the City Attorney, a copy of which shall be kept on file in the Office of the City Clerk and authorizes and directs the Mayor to execute the same. Presented by Approved as to form by Eric Crockett Glen R. Googins Director, Economic Development City Attorney 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 87 RESOLUTION NO. __________ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/2018 APPROPRIATING $500,000 FROM THE SALE OF EXCESS PROPERTIES FOR THE DEMOLITION OF CITY OWNED PROPERTY LOCATED AT 707 F STREET WHEREAS, the City of Chula Vista owns a property currently designated as San Diego County Assessor’s Parcel Number 567-031-27, said parcel being located at the corner of F Street and Woodlawn Avenue; and WHEREAS, said City owned property is vacant, in disrepair and its buildings and improvements are no longer safe for use; and WHJEREAS, this property have become an attractive nuisance for the homeless and has experienced numerous instances of graffiti and petty crime; and. WHEREAS, said property is no longer needed for City use and will be marketed for sale or development; and WHEREAS, demolition of the existing improvements and buildings will increase the property’s marketability and eliminate the attractive nuisance problems; WHEREAS, the City will have to establish a fund to demolish and rehabilitate the property., and WHEREAS, THE City will receive $500,000 in unanticipated revenue in the current fiscal year from the sale of excess City owned land. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista hereby amends the fiscal year capital improvement budget for fiscal year 2017-2018 by $350,000 for the demolition of 707 F Street (APN 567-031-27) Presented by Approved as to form by Eric C. Crockett Glen R. Googins Director of Economic Development City Attorney 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 88 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 89 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 90 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 91 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 92 Silvergate Development Purchase Agreement Page 1 Escrow Company: Stewart Title Escrow No. Title Order No. REAL PROPERTY PURCHASE AGREEMENT AND JOINT ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS THIS REAL PROPERTY PURCHASE AGREEMENT AND JOINT ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS (“Agreement”) is entered into by and between the CITY OF CHULA VISTA, a chartered municipal corporation (“Seller”), and SILVERGATE DEVELOPMENT, LLC (“Buyer”) [Seller and Buyer may be referred to in this Agreement individually as a “Party” and collectively as the “Parties”] to be effective as of the date of execution by Seller (“Effective Date”), with reference to the following facts: WHEREAS, Buyer desires to purchase fee title in and to Seller’s real property located south of and adjacent to 150 Bonita Road and more particularly described in the legal description contained in Exhibit “A” (“Property”), which is attached to and incorporated into this Agreement by this reference; and WHEREAS, Buyer has offered Seller the sum of $225,000.00 (“Purchase Price”) for the purchase of the Property; and WHERAS, Seller has agreed to accept said Purchase Price subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows: 1. AGREEMENT TO SELL AND PURCHASE PROPERTY In strict accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, Buyer agrees to purchase from Seller and Seller agrees to sell to Buyer fee title in and to the Property. 2. PURCHASE PRICE The total Purchase Price of the Property shall be the sum of TWO HUNDRED TWENTY- FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($225,000.00) which will be paid by Buyer to Seller at the close of Escrow as provided in this Agreement. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 93 Silvergate Development Purchase Agreement Page 2 3. CONDITIONS PRECEDENT TO ESCROW CLOSE AND CONVEYANCE OF TITLE Buyer and Seller acknowledge that this sale is for use in the development of Buyer’s adjacent property which is currently undergoing the entitlement process. Buyer and seller agree to delay the close of escrow on this sale until entitlements are complete or by no later than June 30, 2018 whichever occurs first. 4. BUYERS CLOSING CONDITIONS a. Due Diligence Deliveries. Promptly after execution of this Agreement, Seller shall provide Buyer with the following, to the extent they are within Seller's possession or control; copies of all materials relating to or affecting the Property permits, approvals, certificates, notices, contracts, studies, reports, appraisals, utility bills, insurance bills and policies, applications of or to governmental or quasi-governmental entities, surveys, maps, plans, specifications, drawings, service or other contracts, and any leases, agreements or instruments. Buyer understands that Seller makes no guaranties or warranties as to any of the materials it provides Buyer (other than the representation and warranty that Seller is providing Buyer all documents and information in Seller’s or its agent’s knowledge, possession, or control). b. Due Diligence Conditions. Buyer shall have Forty-Five (45) Calendar Days from delivery of a Preliminary Title Report for the subject Property from Stewart Title (the “Due Diligence Period”), to review and approve said Preliminary Title Report and all other documents supplied by Seller pursuant to the preceding Condition 5(a). Seller shall facilitate Buyer’s access to the Property at reasonable times, for any and all physical inspections required by Buyer. c. Title. Stewart Title of San Diego, as title insurer, must be prepared to issue Buyer on the Closing Date a policy of title insurance in the form and substance requested by Buyer during the Due Diligence Period. d. No Adverse Actions or Changes. As of the Closing Date, there may not then be pending or threatened, any litigation, administrative proceeding, investigation, or other form of governmental enforcement, executive or legislative proceeding in any way related to, directed at, or otherwise affecting the use, operation, or occupancy of any portion of the Property and no material adverse change may have occurred in the value or condition of the Property. 5. ESCROW AND TITLE INSURANCE Buyer agrees to open an escrow (“Escrow’) in accordance with this Agreement at Stewart Title of San Diego (“Escrow Holder”) and deposit a fully executed copy of this Agreement by no later than seven (7) days after City Council approval of this Agreement. Buyer shall, concurrent with the delivery of this Agreement deposit $5,000.00 into said Escrow. Buyer shall deliver an additional $5,000 into Escrow within three days after Buyer waives due diligence conditions as set forth in Section 5 (b) above. Deposits will be applied against the Purchase Price at closing. All usual and reasonable fees, charges, and costs (including transfer taxes, if any) which arise in the Escrow, shall be paid by Buyer upon demand of Escrow Holder. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 94 Silvergate Development Purchase Agreement Page 3 This Agreement constitutes the joint escrow instructions of the Parties, and Escrow Holder to whom these instructions are delivered is empowered to act under this Agreement. The Parties agree to do all acts reasonably necessary to close Escrow as soon as possible, but in all events by no later than June 30, 2018. The terms “closing” and/or “close of Escrow” as used herein shall mean the date necessary instruments of conveyance are recorded in the office of the County Recorder. Recordation of instruments delivered through Escrow are authorized if necessary or proper in the issuance of title insurance pursuant to this Agreement. Concurrent with the opening of Escrow, Escrow Holder shall order a Preliminary Title Report for the subject Property to be delivered for review by both Buyer and Seller. Buyer shall review and respond to said Preliminary Report as set forth in Section 5 (b). Buyer shall, upon receipt of a statement of estimated closing cost from Escrow Holder, deposit the balance of the Purchase Price together with additional funds as set forth in the statement. The deposit shall be made in accordance with the wire transfer instructions of the Escrow Holder and shall be made in sufficient time to allow for the timely close of Escrow. Buyer shall execute and deposit into Escrow a Certificate of Acceptance accepting fee title to the Property in sufficient time to allow for the timely close of Escrow. Seller shall execute and deliver into Escrow an executed Grant Deed conveying fee title to the Property to Buyer in sufficient time to allow for the timely close of Escrow. Seller and Buyer agree to deposit with Escrow Holder any additional instruments as may be reasonable and necessary to complete this transaction in a timely manner. All funds received in Escrow shall be deposited with other Escrow funds in a general escrow account(s) and may be transferred to any other such escrow trust account in any State or National Bank doing business in the State of California. All disbursements shall be made by wire transfer from such account, unless Seller requests another form of payment. If Buyer requests a policy of title insurance when Escrow Holder holds for Seller the Grant Deed in favor of Buyer, executed and acknowledged by Seller covering the Property, Escrow Holder shall cause said policy to be issued and delivered to Buyer, at Buyer's sole cost (“Title Policy”), with liability in the amount of the Purchase Price, covering the Property and showing title vesting in Buyer, free of all recorded and unrecorded, liens, encumbrances, and taxes except those previously accepted by Buyer, and: (1) All non-delinquent general and special real property taxes for the current fiscal year; (2) The standard printed exceptions and exclusions contained in the CLTA or ALTA form policy; 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 95 Silvergate Development Purchase Agreement Page 4 (3) Public and Quasi-public utility, public alley, public street easements and rights of way of record; (4)All present and future zoning, building, environmental and other laws, ordinances, codes, restrictions and regulations of all governmental authorities having jurisdiction with respect to the Property, including, without limitation, landmark designations and all zoning variances and special exceptions, if any; (5) Variations between tax lot lines and lines of record title; and (6) Any lien or encumbrance arising out of the acts or omissions of Buyer. Escrow Holder is authorized to and shall pay and charge Buyer for any title insurance premium and the costs of any endorsements. Escrow Holder is authorized to and shall disburse funds and deliver the Grant Deed when Buyer and Seller have fulfilled all conditions of the Escrow and the Agreement. 6. RESPONSIBILITY OF ESCROW HOLDER Responsibility of Escrow Holder under this Agreement is expressly limited to Section 5 herein and to its liability under any policy of title insurance issued in regard to this transaction. 7. TITLE AND CONVEYANCE OF INTEREST Seller shall convey fee simple title to the Property to Buyer by Grant Deed, in substantially the same for as Exhibit B hereto, subject to zoning and building laws and ordinances, and acts done or suffered by Buyer or claims made by, through, or under Buyer. To the actual knowledge of Seller, without further inquiry, as of the effective date there are no unrecorded liens, leases, or encumbrances against the Property. Fee title shall pass to Buyer upon recordation of said Grant Deed (“Delivery”). 8. CONDITION OF PROPERTY/AS IS. a. BUYER ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES THAT SELLER HAS NOT MADE, DOES NOT MAKE, AND SPECIFICALLY NEGATES AND DISCLAIMS ANY REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES AND SELLER HAS NOT MADE, DOES NOT MAKE, AND SPECIFICALLY NEGATES AND DISCLAIMS ANY OBLIGATIONS OF ANY KIND OR CHARACTER WHATSOEVER, WHETHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, ORAL OR WRITTEN, PAST, PRESENT, OR FUTURE, OF, AS TO, CONCERNING OR WITH RESPECT TO (A) THE VALUE, NATURE, QUALITY, OR CONDITION OF THE PROPERTY, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, THE WATER, SOIL, AND GEOLOGY, (B) THE INCOME TO BE DERIVED FROM THE PROPERTY, (C) THE SUITABILITY OF THE PROPERTY FOR ANY AND ALL ACTIVITIES AND USES WHICH BUYER MAY CONDUCT THEREON, (D) THE COMPLIANCE OF OR BY THE PROPERTY OR ITS 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 96 Silvergate Development Purchase Agreement Page 5 OPERATION WITH ANY LAWS, RULES, ORDINANCES OR REGULATIONS OF ANY APPLICABLE GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITY OR BODY, (E) THE HABITABILITY, MERCHANTABILITY, MARKETABILITY, PROFITABILITY, OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF THE PROPERTY, (F) THE MANNER OR QUALITY OF THE CONSTRUCTION OR MATERIALS, IF ANY, INCORPORATED INTO THE PROPERTY, (G) THE MANNER, QUALITY, STATE OF REPAIR, OR LACK OF REPAIR OF THE PROPERTY, OR (H) ANY OTHER MATTER WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPERTY, AND SPECIFICALLY, THAT SELLER HAS NOT MADE, DOES NOT MAKE, AND SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS ANY REPRESENTATIONS REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH ANY ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, POLLUTION, OR LAND USE, ZONING, OR DEVELOPMENT OR REGIONAL IMPACT LAWS, RULES, REGULATIONS, ORDERS, OR REQUIREMENTS. BUYER FURTHER ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES THAT HAVING BEEN GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY TO INSPECT THE PROPERTY, BUYER IS RELYING SOLELY ON ITS OWN INVESTIGATION OF THE PROPERTY. BUYER FURTHER ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES THAT ANY INFORMATION PROVIDED OR TO BE PROVIDED WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPERTY WAS OBTAINED FROM A VARIETY OF SOURCES AND THAT SELLER HAS NOT MADE ANY INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION OR VERIFICATION OF SUCH INFORMATION AND MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS AS TO THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF SUCH INFORMATION. SELLER IS NOT LIABLE OR BOUND IN ANY MANNER BY ANY VERBAL OR WRITTEN STATEMENTS, REPRESENTATIONS, OR INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THE PROPERTY, OR THE OPERATION THEREOF, FURNISHED BY ANY REAL ESTATE BROKER, AGENT, EMPLOYEE, SERVANT, OR OTHER PERSON. BUYER FURTHER ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES THAT TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, THE SALE OF THE PROPERTY AS PROVIDED FOR HEREIN IS MADE ON AN "AS IS", "WHERE IS" AND, "WITH ALL FAULTS" CONDITION AND BASIS. Buyer's Initials: ________________ b. Effective as of the close of Escrow, Buyer shall, and by the execution of the Agreement, hereby does, forever release Seller of and from any and all losses, liabilities, damages, claims, demands, causes of action, costs, and expenses, whether known or unknown, to the extent arising out of or in any way connected with the Property after the close of Escrow, including, without limitation, the condition of title to the Property or the environmental or structural condition of the Property. Buyer agrees never to commence, aid in any way, or prosecute against Seller, any action or other proceeding based upon any losses, liabilities, damages, claims, demands, causes of action, costs, or expenses, arising out of or in any way connected with the Property after the close of Escrow, including, without limitation, the condition of title to the Property and the environmental and structural condition 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 97 Silvergate Development Purchase Agreement Page 6 of the Property. Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary contained herein, nothing in this Section 8 shall be deemed to constitute a waiver of any rights or remedies arising from Seller's intentional fraud or intentional misrepresentation of any material fact with an intent to mislead. c. Buyer hereby fully and forever releases and discharges Seller from any and all claims, rights, actions, damages, and/or liabilities, of any nature whatsoever, fixed or contingent, existing now or arising in the future, known or unknown, in any way relating to the Property, excluding only claims arising under this Agreement. Buyer acknowledges Buyer may later learn of circumstances bearing upon the rights released in this Agreement. Buyer specifically waives the rights afforded by Section 1542 of the California Civil Code which provides: “A general release does not extend to claims which the creditor does not know or suspect to exist in his or her favor at the time of executing the release, which if known by him or her, must have materially affected his or her settlement with the debtor.” Buyer's Initials: ________________ 9. SELLER DEFAULT IF THE SELLER DEFAULTS UNDER THE TERMS OF THE AGREEMENT, AND IF SELLER FAILS TO CURE SUCH DEFAULT ON OR BEFORE THE DATE WHICH IS THREE (3) BUSINESS DAYS AFTER NOTICE THEREOF FROM BUYER (OR, IF EARLIER, ON THE CLOSING DATE), BUYER MAY, AS ITS SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE REMEDY, EITHER (I) TERMINATE THIS AGREEMENT BY DELIVERY OF NOTICE OF TERMINATION TO SELLER AND ESCROW HOLDER, IN WHICH EVENT THE DEPOSIT SHALL BE RETURNED TO BUYER, AND THIS AGREEMENT, AND THE RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF BUYER AND SELLER HEREUNDER SHALL TERMINATE OR (II) SPECIFICALLY ENFORCE SELLER'S OBLIGATIONS. Seller's Initials: __________Buyer's Initials: __________ 10. INDEMNITY To the maximum extent provided by law, Buyer releases and agrees to indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless Seller and its elected officials, officers, employees, contractors and agents (“Indemnified Parties”) from and against any and all demands, claims, causes of action, injuries, liabilities, losses, damages, costs, or expenses, however the same may be caused, including all costs and reasonable attorney’s fees in providing the defense to any claim arising therefrom, for any loss of, or damage to property (real and/or personal), for personal injury to or death of any person or persons arising out of or occurring by reason of, or any way connected with this Agreement or the purchase, condition, existence, use, or improvement of the Property from and after the date of Delivery. This 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 98 Silvergate Development Purchase Agreement Page 7 Indemnity shall survive termination and expiration of this Agreement and shall be binding upon Buyer, and its successors and assigns. 11. INDEMNITY FOR DRAINAGE To the maximum extent provided by law, Buyer releases and agrees to indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless all Indemnified Parties from and against any and all demands, claims, causes of action, injuries, liabilities, losses, damages, costs, or expenses, however the same may be caused, including all costs and reasonable attorney’s fees in providing the defense to any claims arising therefrom, for any losses of, or damages to property (real and/or personal), for personal injuries to or death of any person or persons arising out of or occurring by reason of, or any way connected with Buyer’s use or improvement of the Property which in any way affects or impacts the drainage on, from, or across the Property from and after the date of Delivery. This Indemnity shall survive termination and expiration of this Agreement and shall be binding upon Buyer, and its successors and assigns. 12. ENVIRONMENTAL INDEMNITY To the maximum extent provided by law, Buyer shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless all Indemnified Parties from and against any and all damages, losses, liabilities, obligations, penalties, claims, litigation, demands, defenses, judgments, suits, proceedings, costs, disbursements, or expenses (including, without limitation, attorneys’ and experts’ fees and disbursements) of any kind or of any nature whatsoever which may at any time be imposed upon, incurred by or asserted or awarded against the Seller, from and after the date of Delivery, as to the Property or any portions of the Property, arising from or out of: the existence, release, presence, or disposal on, in, under, about, or adjacent of any hazardous materials, hazardous substances, hazardous waste, or toxic substances, as defined in all applicable local, state, and federal laws and regulations (collectively, “Hazardous Materials”). This Indemnity shall be binding upon Buyer, and its successors and assigns, and inure to the benefit, together with all rights and remedies of Seller pursuant to this Agreement and any successor to Seller’s powers or interests in the Property. This Indemnity shall survive termination and expiration of this Agreement and shall be binding upon Buyer, and its successors and assigns. 13. LIMITED LIABILITY Any obligations or liabilities of Seller arising by virtue of this Agreement shall be limited to the Property and resort shall not be had to any other assets of Seller. 14. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS Buyer shall be solely responsible for compliance with all laws, governmental regulations, and the direction of competent legal authority related directly or indirectly to Buyer’s purchase and intended use of the Property, all at Buyer’s sole cost and expense. Buyer shall protect, defend, 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 99 Silvergate Development Purchase Agreement Page 8 indemnify, and hold harmless the Indemnified Parties from and against any and all claims asserted or liability established for damages or injuries to any person or property, including injury to Buyer’s officers, employees, invitees, guests, agents, or contractors, which arise out of or are in any manner directly or indirectly connected with Buyer’s efforts to comply with such legal requirements. 15. REAL ESTATE COMMISSIONS Seller has not contracted with a Broker in this transaction and Seller will not be responsible for any commission arising from this transaction. If any other broker, finder, or other person makes a claim for commissions or finder's fee based upon any contract, dealing, or communication with a party, then such party shall indemnify, defend, and hold the other party harmless from and against any and all damages, claims, losse,s and expenses, including attorneys' fees, arising out of the broker's, finder's, or other person's claim. 16. CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL REQUIRED Buyer understands and agrees that this Agreement must be reviewed and considered at a hearing before the City Council. Buyer also understands that prior to the execution of this Agreement by Seller, the City Council must determine and declare the Property as surplus land as provided for in California Government Code. The City Council has the discretion to approve or disapprove the surplus land finding and/or this Agreement or any sections thereof. 17. MISCELLANEOUS a. Legal Fees. In the event of the bringing of any action or suit by either party against the other party by reason of any breach of any of the covenants, conditions, agreements or provisions on the part of the other party arising out of this Agreement, the party in whose favor final judgment shall be entered shall be entitled to have and recover of and from the other party all costs and expenses of suit, including reasonable attorneys' fees (or, in the event of any action to enforce this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover all of its costs and expenses of the action, including reasonable attorney's fees), as determined by a court of competent jurisdiction. b. Time is of the Essence. Time is of the essence of each and every term, condition, obligation and provision of this Agreement. c. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which, together, shall constitute one and the same instrument. Facsimile signatures are acceptable provided they are followed by hard copy originals within five days. d. Severability. If any portion of this Agreement shall be declared by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable, such portion shall be deemed severed from this Agreement, and the remaining parts of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect, as fully as though such invalid, illegal, or unenforceable portion had never been part of this Agreement. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 100 Silvergate Development Purchase Agreement Page 9 e. Governing Law. This Agreement is executed and delivered in the State of California and shall be construed and enforced in accordance with, and governed by, the laws of the State of California. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the duly authorized representative of each party has executed this Agreement effective upon the date first written above. SELLER: City of Chula Vista BUYER: SILVERGATE DEVELOPMENT By: By: Name: Name: Its: Its: By: Name: Its: Approved as to Form: Glen Googins, City Attorney Exhibit A: Legal Description Exhibit B: Form of Grant Deed 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 101 Gardenlife Purchase Agreement APN. 595-070-74 and 79 Page 1 Escrow Company: Chicago Title Escrow No. Title Order No. REAL PROPERTY PURCHASE AGREEMENT AND JOINT ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS THIS REAL PROPERTY PURCHASE AGREEMENT AND JOINT ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS (“Agreement”) is entered into by and between the CITY OF CHULA VISTA, a chartered municipal corporation(“Seller”), and GARDENLIFE-SALVA, LLC(“Buyer”)[Seller and Buyer may be referred to in this Agreement individually as a “Party” and collectively as the “Parties”] to be effective as of the date of execution by Seller (“Effective Date”), with reference to the following facts: WHEREAS, Buyer desires to purchase fee title in and to Seller’s real property located at on the northwest corner of Eastlake Parkway and SR-125, and currently identified as San Diego County Assessors Parcel No. 595-070-74 and 595-070-749 more particularly described in the legal description contained in Exhibit “A”(“Property”), which is attached to and incorporated into this Agreement by this reference;and, WHEREAS, Buyerhas offered Seller the sum of $156,173.00 (“Purchase Price”) for the purchase of the Property; and, WHERAS, Seller has agreed to accept said Purchase Price subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. NOW THEREFORE, the Parties agree as follows: 1. AGREEMENT TO SELL AND PURCHASE PROPERTY In strict accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, Buyer agrees to purchase from Seller and Seller agrees to sell to Buyer fee title in and to the Property. 2. PURCHASE PRICE The total Purchase Price of the Property shall be the sum of ONE HUNDRED FIFTY SIX THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED SEVENTY THREE DOLLARS ($156,173.00) which will be paid by 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 102 Gardenlife Purchase Agreement APN. 595-070-74 and 79 Page 2 Buyer to Seller at the close of Escrow as provided in this Agreement. The Purchase Price is set forth as follows: Land $ 75,000.00 Cell site Lease buy-out (four years) $ 81,173.00 TOTAL $156,173.00 Purchase price includesCity’s ownership and/or rights, if any,to an existing water meter located on the Property. 3. CONDITIONS PRECEDENT TO ESCROW CLOSE AND CONVEYANCE OF TITLE Buyer and Seller acknowledge that a license for cellular facilities between the Seller and T-Mobile (“Carrier”) exists on a portion of the Property, with a remaining term of approximately four (4) years. Prior to the close of Escrow and the conveyance of title to the Property the following must occur: (1) Buyer must negotiate a new license agreement or lease with the Carrier, with Buyer as the lessor/licensor. (2) Carrier and Seller must agree to terminate the existing license agreement at no cost to Seller and with no continuing obligations of Seller under the existing license agreement or otherwise relative to the cellular facilities on the Property. (3) Buyer will deposit the sum of $81,173.00 (per Section 2 above) as compensation to Seller for revenue lost as a result of the termination of the existing license agreement between Seller and Carrier. (4) Seller shall confirm, in Seller’s sole discretion, resolution of an improper cloud to title created by a deed recorded with the San Diego County Recorder, Document Number 2005-0048691. (5) The City Council of Chula Vista approves this Agreement as provided in section 16 of this Agreement. 4. ESCROW AND TITLE INSURANCE Buyeragrees to open an escrow (“Escrow’) in accordance with this Agreement with Chicago Title, San Diego, CA (“Escrow Holder”) and deposit a fully executed copy of this Agreement by no later than seven (7)days afterCity Council approval of this Agreement. All usual and reasonable fees, charges, and costs (including transfer taxes, if any) which arise in the Escrow, shall be paid by Seller upon demand of Escrow Holder. This Agreement constitutes the joint escrow instructions of the Parties, and Escrow Holder to whom these instructions are delivered is empowered to act under this Agreement. The Parties agree to do all acts reasonably necessary to close Escrow as soon as possible, but in all events by no later than ninety (90) days after a fully executed copy of this Agreement, is deposited into Escrow. The terms “closing” 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 103 Gardenlife Purchase Agreement APN. 595-070-74 and 79 Page 3 and/or “close of Escrow” as used herein shall mean the date necessary instruments of conveyance are recorded in the office of the County Recorder. Recordation of instruments delivered through Escrow are authorized if necessary or proper in the issuance of title insurance pursuant to this Agreement. Buyershall, upon receipt of a statement of estimated closing cost from Escrow Holder, deposit the Purchase Price together with additional funds as set forth in the statement. The deposit shall be made in accordance with the wire transfer instructions of the Escrow Holder and shall be made in sufficient time to allow for the timely close of Escrow. Buyer shall execute and deposit into Escrow a Certificate of Acceptance accepting fee title to the Property in sufficient time to allow for the timely close of Escrow. Seller shall execute and deliver into Escrow an executed Grant Deed, in substantially the same form as Exhibit B, conveying fee title to the Property to Buyerin sufficient time to allow for the timely close of Escrow. Seller and Buyer agree to deposit with Escrow Holder any additional instruments as may be reasonable and necessary to complete this transaction in a timely manner. All funds received in Escrow shall be deposited with other Escrow funds in a general escrow account(s) and may be transferred to any other such escrow trust account in any State or National Bank doing business in the State of California. All disbursements shall be made by wire transfer from such account, unless Seller requests another form of payment. If Buyerrequests a policy of title insurance when Escrow Holder holds for Seller the Grant Deed in favor of Buyer, executed and acknowledged by Seller covering the Property, Escrow Holder shall cause to be issued and delivered to Buyer, at Buyer's sole cost, a preliminary title report for Buyer review. Buyer shall have five (5) days to review and approve the preliminary title report. After Buyer approval, Escrow Holder shall cause to be issued, as of the closing date and at Buyer'ssole cost, an ALTA orCLTA standard coverage policy of title insurance (“Title Policy”), issued by Commonwealth Land Title, with liability in the amount of the Purchase Price. Escrow Holder is authorized to and shall pay and charge Buyerfor any title insurance premium and the costs of any endorsements. Escrow Holder is authorized to and shall disburse funds and deliver the Grant Deed when Buyer and Seller have fulfilled all conditions of the Escrow and purchase agreement. 5. RESPONSIBILITY OF ESCROW HOLDER Responsibility of Escrow Holder under this Agreement is expressly limited to Section 4herein and to its liability under any policy of title insurance issued in regard to this transaction. 6. TITLE AND CONVEYANCE OF INTEREST Seller shall convey fee simple title to the Property to Buyerby Grant Deed in substantially the same form as that attached to this Agreement as Exhibit B (“Grant Deed”) subject to zoning and building laws and ordinances, and acts done or suffered by Buyer or claims made by, through, or under Buyer. To the actual knowledge of Seller, without further inquiry, as of the effective date there are no unrecorded liens, 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 104 Gardenlife Purchase Agreement APN. 595-070-74 and 79 Page 4 leases, or encumbrances against the Property. Fee title shall pass to Buyer upon recordation of said Grant Deed (“Delivery”). 7. DEPOSIT OF FUNDS Buyer will deposit the Purchase Price of $156,173.00 to Escrow for dispersal to Seller at the close of Escrow. 8. CONDITION OF PROPERTY/AS IS. a. BUYERACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES THAT SELLER HAS NOT MADE, DOES NOT MAKE, AND SPECIFICALLY NEGATES AND DISCLAIMS ANY REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES AND SELLER HAS NOT MADE, DOES NOT MAKE, AND SPECIFICALLY NEGATES AND DISCLAIMS ANY OBLIGATIONS OF ANY KIND OR CHARACTER WHATSOEVER, WHETHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, ORAL OR WRITTEN, PAST, PRESENT, OR FUTURE, OF, AS TO, CONCERNING OR WITH RESPECT TO (A) THE VALUE, NATURE, QUALITY OR CONDITION OF THE PROPERTY, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, THE WATER, SOIL AND GEOLOGY, (B) THE INCOME TO BE DERIVED FROM THE PROPERTY, (C) THE SUITABILITY OF THE PROPERTY FOR ANY AND ALL ACTIVITIES AND USES WHICH BUYER MAY CONDUCT THEREON, (D) THE COMPLIANCE OF OR BY THE PROPERTY OR ITS OPERATION WITH ANY LAWS, RULES, ORDINANCES OR REGULATIONS OF ANY APPLICABLE GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITY OR BODY, (E) THE HABITABILITY, MERCHANTABILITY, MARKETABILITY, PROFITABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF THE PROPERTY, (F) THE MANNER OR QUALITY OF THE CONSTRUCTION OR MATERIALS, IF ANY, INCORPORATED INTO THE PROPERTY, (G) THE MANNER, QUALITY, STATE OF REPAIR OR LACK OF REPAIR OF THE PROPERTY, OR (H) ANY OTHER MATTER WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPERTY, AND SPECIFICALLY, THAT SELLER HAS NOT MADE, DOES NOT MAKE, AND SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS ANY REPRESENTATIONS REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH ANY ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, POLLUTION OR LAND USE, ZONING OR DEVELOPMENT OR REGIONAL IMPACT LAWS, RULES, REGULATIONS, ORDERS OR REQUIREMENTS. BUYER FURTHER ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES THAT HAVING BEEN GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY TO INSPECT THE PROPERTY, BUYER IS RELYING SOLELY ON ITS OWN INVESTIGATION OF THE PROPERTY. BUYER FURTHER ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES THAT ANY INFORMATION PROVIDED OR TO BE PROVIDED WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPERTY WAS OBTAINED FROM A VARIETY OF SOURCES AND THAT SELLER HAS NOT MADE ANY INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION OR VERIFICATION OF SUCH INFORMATION AND MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS AS TO THE ACCURACY 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 105 Gardenlife Purchase Agreement APN. 595-070-74 and 79 Page 5 OR COMPLETENESS OF SUCH INFORMATION. SELLER IS NOT LIABLE OR BOUND IN ANY MANNER BY ANY VERBAL OR WRITTEN STATEMENTS, REPRESENTATIONS OR INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THE PROPERTY, OR THE OPERATION THEREOF, FURNISHED BY ANY REAL ESTATE BROKER, AGENT, EMPLOYEE, SERVANT OR OTHER PERSON. BUYER FURTHER ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES THAT TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, THE SALE OF THE PROPERTY AS PROVIDED FOR HEREIN IS MADE ON AN "AS IS", "WHERE IS" AND, "WITH ALL FAULTS" CONDITION AND BASIS. Buyer's Initials: ________________ b. Effective as of the close of Escrow, Buyer shall, and by the execution of the Agreement, hereby does, forever release Seller of and from any and all losses, liabilities, damages, claims, demands, causes of action, costs and expenses, whether known or unknown, to the extent arising out of or in any way connected with the Property after the close of Escrow, including, without limitation, the condition of title to the Property and the environmental and structural condition of the Property. Buyer agrees never to commence, aid in any way, or prosecute against Seller, any action or other proceeding based upon any losses, liabilities, damages, claims, demands, causes of action, costs and expenses, arising out of orin any way connected with the Property after the close of Escrow, including, without limitation, the condition of title to the Property and the environmental and structural condition of the Property. Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary contained herein, nothing in this Section 8shall be deemed to constitute a waiver of any rights or remedies arising from Seller's intentional fraud or intentional misrepresentation of any material fact with an intent to mislead. c. Buyer hereby fully and forever releases and discharges Seller from any and all claims, rights, actions, damages, and/or liabilities, of any nature whatsoever, fixed or contingent, existing now or arising in the future, known or unknown, in any way relating to the Property, excludingonly claims arising under this Agreement. Buyeracknowledges Buyermay later learn of circumstances bearing upon the rights released in this Agreement. Buyerspecifically waives the rights afforded by Section 1542 of the California Civil Code which provides: “A general release does not extend to claims which the creditor does not know or suspect to exist in his or her favor at the time of executing the release, which if known by him or her, must have materially affected his or her settlement with the debtor.” Buyer's Initials: ________________ 9. SELLER DEFAULT 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 106 Gardenlife Purchase Agreement APN. 595-070-74 and 79 Page 6 IF THE SELLER DEFAULTS UNDER THE TERMS OF THE AGREEMENT, AND IF SELLER FAILS TO CURE SUCH DEFAULT ON OR BEFORE THE DATE WHICH IS THREE (3) BUSINESS DAYS AFTER NOTICE THEREOF FROM BUYER (OR, IF EARLIER, ON THE CLOSING DATE), BUYER MAY, AS ITS SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE REMEDY, EITHER (I) TERMINATE THIS AGREEMENT BY DELIVERY OF NOTICE OF TERMINATION TO SELLER AND ESCROW HOLDER, IN WHICH EVENT THE DEPOSIT SHALL BE RETURNED TO BUYER, AND THIS AGREEMENT, ANDTHE RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF BUYER AND SELLER HEREUNDER SHALL TERMINATE OR (II) SPECIFICALLY ENFORCE SELLER'S OBLIGATIONS. Seller's Initials: __________Buyer's Initials: __________ 10. INDEMNITY To the maximum extent provided by law, Buyerreleases and agrees to indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless Seller and its elected officials, officers, employees, contractors and agents (“Indemnified Parties”) from and against all demands, claims, injury, liability, loss, damage, cost and expense, however the same may be caused, including all costs and reasonable attorney’s fees in providing the defense to any claim arising therefrom, for any loss of, or damage to property (real and/or personal), for personal injury to or death of any person or persons arising out of or occurring by reason of, or any way connected with this Agreement or the purchase, condition, existence, use, or improvement of the Property from and after the date of Delivery. This Indemnity shall survive termination and expiration of this Agreement and shall be binding upon Buyer, and its successors and assigns. 11. INDEMNITY FOR DRAINAGE To the maximum extent provided by law, Buyerreleases and agrees toindemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless all Indemnified Parties from and against all demands, claims, injury, liability, loss, damage, cost and expense, however the same may be caused, including all costs and reasonable attorney’s fees in providing the defense to any claim arising therefrom, for any loss of, or damage to property (real and/or personal), for personal injury to or death of any person or persons arising out of or occurring by reason of, or any way connected with Buyer’suse or improvement of the Property which in any way affects or impacts the drainage on, from, or across the Property from and after the date of Delivery. This Indemnity shall survive termination and expiration of this Agreement and shall be binding upon Buyer, and its successors and assigns. 12. ENVIRONMENTAL INDEMNITY To the maximum extent provided by law, Buyershall indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless all Indemnified Parties from and against any and all damages, losses, liabilities, obligations, penalties, claims, litigation, demands, defenses, judgments, suits, proceedings, costs, disbursements, or expenses (including, without limitation, attorneys’ and experts’ fees and disbursements) of any kind or of any nature 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 107 Gardenlife Purchase Agreement APN. 595-070-74 and 79 Page 7 whatsoever which may at any time be imposed upon, incurred by or asserted or awarded against the Seller, from and after the date of Delivery, as to the Property or any portions of the Property, arising from or out of: the existence, release, presence or disposal on, in, under, about or adjacent of any hazardous materials, hazardous substances, hazardous waste or toxic substances, as defined in all applicable local, state, and federal laws and regulations (collectively, “Hazardous Materials”). This Indemnity shall bebinding upon Buyer, and its successors and assigns, and inure to the benefit, together with all rights and remedies of Seller pursuant to this Agreement and any successor to Seller’s powers or interests in the Property. This Indemnity shall survive termination and expiration of this Agreement and shall be binding upon Buyer, and its successors and assigns. 13. LIMITED LIABILITY Any obligations or liabilities of Seller arising by virtue of this Agreement shall be limited to the Property and resort shall not be had to any other assets of Seller. 14. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS Buyer shall be solely responsible for compliance with all laws, governmental regulations, and the direction of competent legalauthority related directly or indirectly to Buyer’s purchase andintended use of the Property, all at Buyer’s sole cost and expense. Buyer shall protect, defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the Indemnified Parties from and against any and all claims asserted or liability established for damages or injuries to any person or property, including injury to Buyer’s officers, employees, invitees, guests, agents, orcontractors, which arise out of or are in any manner directly or indirectly connected with Buyer’s efforts to comply with such legal requirements. 15. REAL ESTATE COMMISSIONS Seller has not contracted with a Broker in this transaction and seller will not be responsible for any commission arising from this transaction. If any other broker, finder or other person makes a claim for commissions or finder's fee based upon any contract, dealing or communication with a party, then such party shall indemnify, defend and hold the other party harmless from and against all damages, claims, losses and expenses, including attorneys' fees, arising out of the broker's, finder's or other person's claim. 16. CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL REQUIRED Buyer understands and agrees that this Agreement must be reviewed and considered at a hearing before the City Council. Buyer also understands that prior to the execution of this Agreement by Seller, the City Council must approve the vacation of public access rights across the Property pursuant to the California Streets and Highways Code and must determine and declare the Property as exempt surplus land as provided for in California Government Code. The City Council has the discretion to approve or disapprove the vacation, the surplus land finding and/or this Agreement or any sections thereof. 17. MISCELLANEOUS 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 108 Gardenlife Purchase Agreement APN. 595-070-74 and 79 Page 8 a. Legal Fees. In the event of the bringing of any action or suit by either party against the other party by reason of any breach of any of the covenants, conditions, agreements or provisions on the part of the other party arising out of this Agreement, the party in whose favor final judgment shall be entered shall be entitled to have and recover of and from the other party all costs and expenses of suit, including reasonable attorneys' fees (or, in the event of any action to enforce this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover all of its costs and expenses of the action, including reasonable attorney's fees), as determined by a court of competent jurisdiction. b. Time is of the Essence. Time is ofthe essence of each and every term, condition, obligation and provision of this Agreement. c. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which, together, shall constitute one and the same instrument. Facsimile signatures are acceptable provided they are followed by hard copy originals within five days. d. Severability. If any portion of this Agreement shall be declared by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable, such portion shall be deemed severed from this Agreement, and the remaining parts of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect, as fully as though such invalid, illegal, or unenforceable portion had never been part of this Agreement. e. Governing Law. This Agreement is executed and delivered in the State of California and shall be construed and enforced in accordance with, and governed by, the laws of the State of California. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the duly authorized representative of each party has executed this Agreement effective upon the date first written above. SELLER: City of Chula Vista BUYER: GARDENLIFE-SALVA, LLC By: By: By:By: Approved as to Form: 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 109 Gardenlife Purchase Agreement APN. 595-070-74 and 79 Page 9 Glen Googins, City Attorney Exhibit A: Legal Description Exhibit B: Form of Grant Deed 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 110 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 111 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 112 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 113 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 114 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 115 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 116 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 117 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 118 Exhibit “A” CalTrans Sale- 805 Express Lane Project. NW corner of Hst and I-805 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 119 Exhibit “B” Silvergate Sale- City Owned Parcel Located South and Adjacent to 150 Bonita rd. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 120 Exhibit “D” Gardenlife-Salva Sale- north side of Eastlake parkway and West of SR125 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 121 Exhibit “C” LDA option- North of E street Adjacent to I-5 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 122 City of Chula Vista Staff Report File#:17-0380, Item#: 7. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING $480,000 FROM THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, AUTHORIZING THE POLICE DEPARTMENT TO PURCHASE RADIO DISPATCH CONSOLE EQUIPMENT FROM MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC. BASED ON THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO’S CONTRACT NUMBER 553982 PRICING AND TERMS, AND APPROPRIATING SAID FUNDS TO THE FEDERAL GRANTS FUND FOR THE URBAN AREA SECURITY INITIATIVE (4/5 VOTE REQUIRED) RECOMMENDED ACTION Council adopt the resolution. SUMMARY The San Diego Office of Homeland Security, who administers the Urban Area Security Initiative (UASI), has notified the City of Chula Vista of fiscal year 2016 UASI funding. The Urban Area Security Initiative addresses the unique planning, organization, equipment, training, and exercise needs of high-threat, high-density urban areas. This funding will be used to purchase and replace police radio dispatch console equipment. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Environmental Notice The activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required. Environmental Determination The Director of Development Services has reviewed the proposed activity for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines because it will not result in a physical change in the environment; therefore, pursuant to Section 15060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Thus, no environmental review is required. BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Not Applicable DISCUSSION One of the core missions of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security is to enhance the ability of state, territory, local, and tribal governments to proven, protect against, mitigate, respond to, and recover from acts of terrorism and other disasters. As first responders to emergency incidents, the Police, Fire, and Public Works Departments have benefited greatly from several Federal Homeland Security Grants. The fiscal year 2016 Urban Area Security Initiative (FY2016 UASI) provides funding for the continued development of readiness and operational response capacity of Police and Fire first City of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 1 of 3 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 123 File#:17-0380, Item#: 7. for the continued development of readiness and operational response capacity of Police and Fire first responder personnel. UASI grant administrators from the California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES) have approved the expenditure plan for equipment, planning and training needs of the City. The spending plan was submitted in advance of funding approval in accordance with grant requirements. Grant funds are restricted as to how they can be spent and cannot supplant normal budgetary items for the City. The specific spending plan for these funds is as follows: Radio Dispatch Console System equipment upgrade The San Diego County Sheriff’s Department manages the San Diego County-Imperial County Regional Communications System (RCS) radio network that services the majority of public safety (Law Enforcement and Fire) and public service (transportation, schools) users in the region. In coordination with all agencies, RCS staff is in the planning stages to upgrade the regional public safety communications system. UASI funding in the amount of $480,000 has been identified, for the City of Chula Vista Police Department, to purchase P25 compatible radio dispatch console equipment. The County of San Diego conducted a competitive procurement for a new regional communications system and the contract was awarded to Motorola Solutions, Inc. The contract includes equipment and services to replace radio dispatch console systems. The Police Department is requesting to piggyback off the County’s contract #553982 with Motorola Solutions, Inc. to procure the equipment and services necessary to replace the department’s radio dispatch consoles. The collaboration with RCS staff and participating agencies has been instrumental in this major communications upgrade. The Police Department recommends the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, accept the $480,000 funding from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, authorize the Police Department to purchase radio dispatch console equipment from Motorola Solutions, Inc. via the County of San Diego’s contract number 553982 and appropriate said funds to the capital category of the Federal Grants fund for the Urban Area Security Initiative (UASI). DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT Staff has reviewed the decision contemplated by this action and has determined that it is not site- specific and consequently, the 500-foot rule found in California Code of Regulations Title 2, section 18702.2(a)(11), is not applicable to this decision for purposes of determining a disqualifying real property-related financial conflict of interest under the Political Reform Act (Cal. Gov't Code § 87100, et seq.). Staff is not independently aware, and has not been informed by any City Council member, of any other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter. LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS The City’s Strategic Plan has five major goals: Operational Excellence, Economic Vitality, Healthy Community, Strong and Secure Neighborhoods and a Connected Community. This resolution supports the goal of Strong and Secure Neighborhoods by enhancing the readiness and operational response capacity of emergency first responder personnel. CURRENT YEAR FISCAL IMPACT Approval of this resolution will result in a one-time appropriation of $480,000 to the capital category of Federal Grants Fund. The funding from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security will completely City of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 2 of 3 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 124 File#:17-0380, Item#: 7. Federal Grants Fund. The funding from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security will completely offset these costs. Therefore, there is no net fiscal impact to the City. ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT There is no ongoing fiscal impact for accepting these grant funds. ATTACHMENTS Resolution Contract Information Staff Contact: Maritza Vargas, Phil Collum City of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 3 of 3 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 125 RESOLUTION NO. __________ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING $480,000 FROM THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, AUTHORIZING THE POLICE DEPARMENT TO PURCHASE RADIO DISPATCH CONSOLE EQUIPMENT FROM MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC. BASED ON THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO’S CONTRACT NUMBER 553982 PRICING, TERMS AND APPROPRIATING SAID FUNDS TO THE FEDERAL GRANTS FUND FOR THE URBAN AREA SECURITY INITIATIVE WHEREAS, the San Diego Office of Homeland Security, who administers the Urban Area Security Initiative (UASI), has notified the City of Chula Vista of fiscal year 2016 UASI funding; and WHEREAS, the Urban Area Security Initiative addresses the unique planning, organization, equipment, training, and exercise needs of high-threat, high-density urban areas; and WHEREAS, grant funds from the Urban Area Security Initiative are restricted as to how the funding can be spent and cannot supplant normal budgetary items for the City; and WHEREAS, the equipment funding includes P25 compatible radio dispatch consoles to upgrade the current dispatch consoles; and WHEREAS, the County of San Diego conducted a competitive procurement for a new regional communications system and established contract number 553982 with Motorola Solutions, Inc. as a result of the competitive procurement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, that it accepts $480,000 from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, authorizes the Police Department to purchase radio dispatch console equipment from Motorola Solutions, Inc. based on the County of San Diego’s contract number 553982 pricing, terms, and appropriates said funds to the capital category of the federal grants fund for the Urban Area Security Initiative. Presented by Approved as to form by Roxana Kennedy Glen R. Googins Police Chief City Attorney 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 126 TO ACCESS THE COUNTY’S RADIO COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM REPLACEMENT CONTRACT WITH MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC. PLEASE DO THE FOLLOWING: Go to this website: http://www.sandiegocounty.gov/content/sdc/purchasing/documentum-contract-search.html Enter Contract #:553982 Open the PDF file with “Document Name” Contract dated 6-27-16 Note: It will take a while to download because the contract is over 1000 pages. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 127 City of Chula Vista Staff Report File#:17-0378, Item#: 8. CONSIDERATION OF THE DECISION OF THE CHIEF OF POLICE AND FINDING REGARDING AN ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE AT 7-ELEVEN LOCATED ON BONITA ROAD A. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AFFIRMING THE DECISION OF THE CHIEF OF POLICE AND FINDING THAT AN ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE AT 4232 AND 4230 A & B BONITA ROAD (7-ELEVEN INC.) DOES NOT SERVE PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY - OR - B. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA REVERSING THE DECISION OF THE CHIEF OF POLICE AND FINDING THAT AN ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE AT 4232 AND 4230 A & B BONITA ROAD (7-ELEVEN INC.) SERVES PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY RECOMMENDED ACTION Council conduct the public hearing and adopt Resolution A. SUMMARY Mike MacFarland of 7-Eleven, Inc. has appealed the Police Department’s finding that an alcoholic beverage license would not serve Public Convenience or Necessity. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Environmental Notice The activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required. Environmental Determination BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Not Applicable. DISCUSSION The Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) is responsible for the issuance of licenses for the sale of alcoholic beverages in the State of California. Section 23958 of the California Business and Professions Code gives ABC the authority to deny an application for a license if such a license would result in an over-concentration of licenses and/or a higher than average crime rate in the area. The Business and Professions Code requires the local governing body to determine whether a public convenience or necessity is served by the issuance of the alcoholic beverage license, given ABC’s City of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 1 of 4 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 128 File#:17-0378, Item#: 8. convenience or necessity is served by the issuance of the alcoholic beverage license, given ABC’s initial determination of over-concentration and/or high crime rate. The local governing body must affirmatively sign a “Public Convenience or Necessity” form in order for the business to obtain an alcoholic beverage license. Process for Public Convenience and Necessity (PCN) Once ABC has determined that there is over-concentration and/or high crime rate in the census tract where the application is submitted, the applicant must submit a “Public Convenience or Necessity” form to the Chief of Police. Once the Chief of Police receives the form from the applicant, a determination hearing is scheduled. The determination hearing is an open meeting, in which the applicant may make a presentation and members of the public may comment and ask questions. The Police Department solicits responses from the community by sending letters to all business owners and residents within 500 feet of the applicant premises notifying them of the determination hearing. In addition to making comments at the hearing, community members may provide written comments. They also may leave a telephone message with a detective to voice their support for or protest of the license. The business must also post a notice of the application on the premises. The Chief of Police then determines whether a public convenience or necessity exists. The Chief of Police may condition a determination of public convenience or necessity. Determination of public convenience or necessity may be based on, but is not limited to, the following criteria: the history of the subject business and/or owner; existing conditions at the site or in the vicinity (e.g., potential for creation of a police problem or aggravation of an existing problem); and the crime rate within the vicinity of the application. If the Chief finds that there is no public convenience or necessity, the applicant may appeal the decision to the City Council. Upon the filing of the appeal with the City Clerk’s Office, the matter is set for a public hearing before the full City Council. The City Council is tasked with making its own determination of public convenience or necessity, based on the record before it and testimony presented at the public hearing, and is not required to defer to the Police Department’s determination. Accordingly, two resolutions with two options regarding public convenience or necessity are presented. The process of determining public convenience or necessity is found in Chula Vista Municipal Code Chapter 5.09. [Attachment 1] 7-Eleven Inc. appeal The 7-Eleven store located at 4232 & 4230 A & B Bonita Road applied for an off-sale beer and wine license (ABC License Type 20) with the California State Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control. ABC determined that there is an over-concentration of alcohol licenses in the census tract where the application is submitted. On April 10, 2017, Sherrie Olson of 7-Eleven, Inc. formally requested the Chula Vista Police Department to conduct a finding of Public Convenience or Necessity [Attachment 2] for the store located at 4232 & 4230 A & B Bonita Road. The Police Department provided notice of 7-Eleven’s ABC license application to residents and business owners within 500 feet of the location [Attachment 3]. On June 20, 2017, the Chula Vista Police Department held a public hearing to gather input on Public Convenience and Necessity for the 7-Eleven store. The Police Department determined that the census tract of the applicant’s location will have an over concentration of alcohol licenses as defined by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control if the application is approved. The Police Department issued notice that the applicant failed to meet Public Convenience or Necessity [Attachment 5]. On July 6, 2017, Mike MacFarland of 7-Eleven Inc. appealed the Police Department’s finding that an alcoholic beverage license does not serve a public convenience or City of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 2 of 4 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 129 File#:17-0378, Item#: 8. necessity [Attachment 6]. The Police Department based the finding that issuing an ABC license to the 7-Eleven store located at 4232 and 4230 A&B Bonita Road does not serve a Public Convenience or Necessity on the following criteria: 1. Another ABC license would cause the area to become further over-concentrated with ABC licenses. According to ABC, the census tract in which the business is located allows for three (3) licenses in that area, and currently six (6) exist. The following six (6) businesses in the area have off-sale licenses: 1) Rite Aid, 4348 Bonita Rd.; 2) Bonita Valley Liquor, 4040 Bonita Rd.; 3) Vons, 4404 Bonita Rd.; 4) Holy Expletive Inc., 417 Milagrosa Cir.; 5) Holiday House Liquor, 4206 Bonita Rd.; and 6) Arco, 4498 Bonita Rd. The map below shows the existing ABC licenses in the census tract. 2. According to Police Department data, the Department received 26 alcohol-related (drunk driver, drunk in public) calls for service and 17 transient-related calls for service in the 4000-4400 block of Bonita Road in the past fiscal year. 3. During the public hearing held on June 20, 2017 at Police Department headquarters, nine (9) people attended. Four (4) people opposed issuance of the license and three (3) were in support of the license. Twenty-nine (29) phone calls were received by the Police Department, in opposition to the license. As of noon on 9/7/2017 (time of agenda publication), thirty-two (32) letters were received by the City, in opposition to the license. [Attachment 4A] Some individuals called and attended the public hearing or submitted letters. Based on the Police Department’s review of home addresses provided in the letters, senders live within an estimated 0.6 miles of the 7-Eleven. Additionally, a list of fifty-four (54) names were submitted to the City Clerk’s Office, in support of the license [Attachment 4B]. For privacy reasons, signatures, home addresses, emails and phone numbers, when provided, were redacted from the letters, phone log and hearing sign in sheet before disclosure to the applicant and publication in the agenda packet. City of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 3 of 4 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 130 File#:17-0378, Item#: 8. Members of the public have expressed the following concerns. a. Over-concentration of alcohol licenses already exists in the area b. Transient population in the area and easy access to alcohol c. Increase in alcohol-related crimes d. Decrease in quality of life in the area e. Traffic congestion and pedestrian safety DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT Staff has reviewed the property holdings of the City Council members and has found no property holdings within 500 feet of the boundaries of the property which is the subject of this action. Consequently, this item does not present a disqualifying real property-related financial conflict of interest under California Code of Regulations Title 2, section 18702.2(a)(11), for purposes of the Political Reform Act (Cal. Gov’t Code §87100,et seq.). Staff is not independently aware, and has not been informed by any City Council member, of any other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter. LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS The City’s Strategic Plan has five major goals: Operational Excellence, Economic Vitality, Healthy Community, Strong and Secure Neighborhoods and a Connected Community. The denial of this alcoholic beverage license supports the Strong and Secure Neighborhoods goal as it limits the number of ABC licenses issued in the city. CURRENT YEAR FISCAL IMPACT Minimal loss of sales tax revenue to the General Fund from alcoholic beverage sales if application is denied. ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT Minimal loss of sales tax revenue to the General Fund from alcoholic beverage sales if application is denied. ATTACHMENTS Attachment 1: Chula Vista Municipal Code Chapter 5.09 Alcoholic Beverage Licenses Attachment 2: Request for a finding of Public Convenience or Necessity dated April 10, 2017 Attachment 3: Notice to residents and business owners of ABC license application dated April 24, 2017 Attachment 4: Public responses regarding ABC license application Attachment 5: Police Department’s denial of issuance of ABC license dated June 27, 2017 Attachment 6: Appeal of denial of ABC license dated July 6, 2017 Attachment 7: Letter from Chief of Police to City Clerk dated July 16, 2017 regarding findings of Public Convenience or Necessity Staff Contact: Jonathan Alegre, Police Department City of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 4 of 4 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 131 RESOLUTION NO. __________ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AFFIRMING THE DECISION OF THE CHIEF OF POLICE AND FINDING THAT AN ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE AT 4232 AND 4230 A & B BONITA ROAD (7-ELEVEN INC.) DOES NOT SERVE PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY WHEREAS, the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) is responsible for the issuance of licenses for the sale of alcoholic beverages in the State of California; and WHEREAS, Section 23958 of the California Business and Professions Code authorizes the ABC to deny an application for a license if such a license would result in an undue concentration of licenses and/or a higher than average crime rate in the area; and WHEREAS, Section 23958.4(b)(2) of the California Business and Professions Code authorizes the local governing body or its designated subordinate officer or body to determine whether issuance of an alcohol license serves Public Convenience or Necessity; and WHEREAS, Chula Vista Municipal Code section 5.09.010 designates the Chief of Police to consider and approve, disapprove or modify applications for determinations of Public Convenience or Necessity; and WHEREAS, Chula Vista Municipal Code section 5.09.050 authorizes the applicant or an interested party to appeal the Chief of Police’s determination of Public Convenience or Necessity to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the 7-Eleven store located at 4232 and 4230 A & B Bonita Road applied for an off-sale beer and wine license with the ABC; and WHEREAS, ABC determined there is over-concentration of alcohol licenses in the census tract where the application is submitted, because three (3) are allowed but six (6) ABC licenses exist in the census tract where the store is located; and WHEREAS, on April 10, 2017, Sherrie Olson of 7-Eleven Inc. formally requested the Police Department to conduct a finding of Public Convenience or Necessity; and WHEREAS, on June 20, 2017, the Chula Vista Police Department held a public hearing to gather input on Public Convenience and Necessity for alcohol sales at the 7-Eleven store; and WHEREAS, based on comments received at the hearing (9 attendees), by phone (29 calls) and by letter (26 received by the Police Department), the majority of the community is opposed to issuing an ABC license to the store because of existing over-concentration of alcohol 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 132 licenses, easy access to alcohol by transients, increase in alcohol-related crimes, increase in traffic congestion and decrease in quality of life; and WHEREAS, the Police Department noted 26 alcohol-related calls for service, to include drunk driver and drunk in public, and 17 transient-related calls for service in the last fiscal year; and WHEREAS, the Chief of Police determined that Public Convenience or Necessity is not served, because of community opposition, alcohol-related and transient-related calls for service, and, as defined by the ABC, the store is located in an area with an over concentration of alcohol licenses; and WHEREAS, the Police Department notified the applicant of the decision, which the applicant appealed to the City Council in a public hearing, which was held on September 12, 2017. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, based on the foregoing and the public hearing before the Council, that it affirms the decision of the Chief of Police. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, based on the foregoing and the public hearing before the Council, that an alcoholic beverage license at 4232 and 4230 A & B Bonita Road (7-Eleven store) does not serve Public Convenience or Necessity. Presented by Approved as to form by Roxana Kennedy Glen R. Googins Chief of Police City Attorney 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 133 RESOLUTION NO. __________ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA REVERSING THE DECISION OF THE CHIEF OF POLICE AND FINDING THAT AN ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE AT 4232 AND 4230 A & B BONITA ROAD (7-ELEVEN INC.) SERVES PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY WHEREAS, the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) is responsible for the issuance of licenses for the sale of alcoholic beverages in the State of California; and WHEREAS, Section 23958 of the California Business and Professions Code authorizes the ABC to deny an application for an alcohol license if such a license would result in an undue concentration of licenses and/or a higher than average crime rate in the area; and WHEREAS, Section 23958.4(b)(2) of the California Business and Professions Code authorizes the local governing body or its designated subordinate officer or body to determine whether issuance of a alcohol license serves the Public Convenience or Necessity; and WHEREAS, Chula Vista Municipal Code section 5.09.010 designates the Chief of Police to consider and approve, disapprove or modify applications for determinations of Public Convenience or Necessity; and WHEREAS, Chula Vista Municipal Code section 5.09.050 authorizes the applicant or an interested party to appeal the Chief of Police’s determination of Public Convenience or Necessity to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the 7-Eleven store at 4232 and 4230 A & B Bonita Road applied for an off- sale beer and wine license with the ABC; and WHEREAS, the ABC determined there is over-concentration of alcohol licenses and a high crime rate in the census tract where the application is submitted, because three (3) are allowed but six (6) ABC licenses exist in the census tract where the store is located; and WHEREAS, on April 10, 2017, Sherrie Olson of 7-Eleven, Inc. formally requested the Police Department to conduct a finding of Public Convenience or Necessity; and WHEREAS, on June 20, 2017, the Chula Vista Police Department held a public hearing to gather input on Public Convenience and Necessity for the 7-Eleven store; and WHEREAS, based on comments received at the hearing (9 attendees), by phone (29 calls) and by letter (26 received by the Police Department), the majority of the community is opposed to issuing an ABC license to the store because of existing over-concentration of alcohol 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 134 licenses, easy access to alcohol by transients, increase in alcohol-related crimes, increase in traffic congestion and decrease in quality of life; and WHEREAS, the Police Department noted 26 alcohol-related calls for service, to include drunk driver and drunk in public, and 17 transient-related calls for service in the past fiscal year; and WHEREAS, the Chief of Police determined that Public Convenience or Necessity is not served, because of community opposition, alcohol-related and transient-related calls for service, and, as defined by the ABC, the store is located in an area with an over concentration of alcohol licenses; and WHEREAS, the Police Department notified the applicant of the decision, which the applicant appealed to the City Council in a public hearing on September 12, 2017. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, based on the public hearing before the Council, that it reverses the decision of the Chief of Police. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, based on the public hearing before the Council, that an alcoholic beverage license at 4232 and 4230 A & B Bonita Road (7-Eleven store) serves Public Convenience or Necessity. Presented by Approved as to form by Roxana Kennedy Glen R. Googins Chief of Police City Attorney 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 135 Chapter 5.09 ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSES Sections: 5.09.010 Determination of public convenience or necessity – Purpose and intent. 5.09.020 Determination of public convenience or necessity – Application – Fee. 5.09.030 Determination of public convenience or necessity – Procedure – Notice required. 5.09.040 Determination of public convenience or necessity – Criteria for consideration. 5.09.050 Determination of public convenience or necessity – Appeals. 5.09.060 Determination of public convenience or necessity – Appeals – City clerk duties. 5.09.010 Determination of public convenience or necessity – Purpose and intent. State law requires that applicants for certain types of alcoholic beverage licenses obtain from local jurisdictions a determination that public convenience or necessity is served by the issuance of said license, if the subject premises is not located in an area which has an overconcentration of alcoholic beverage licenses and/or a higher than average crime rate as defined in Section 23958.4 of the Business and Professions Code. Where the State Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control requires a determination of public convenience or necessity, the chief of police is authorized to consider and approve, disapprove, or modify applications for this determination. (Ord. 2705 § 2, 1997). 5.09.020 Determination of public convenience or necessity – Application – Fee. Applications for a determination of public convenience or necessity shall be made to the chief of police in writing on a form prescribed by the chief of police and shall be accompanied by data sufficient to describe the proposed operations for which the alcoholic beverage license and the determination of public convenience or necessity is required. The application shall be accompanied by a deposit as presently designated, or as may in the future be amended, in the master fee schedule. (Ord. 2705 § 2, 1997). 5.09.030 Determination of public convenience or necessity – Procedure – Notice required. The chief of police shall post (or shall require the applicant to post) a notice of the application on the premises which is the subject of the application. The chief of police shall further provide notice of the public hearing by mailing to property owners of record and residents within 500 feet of the site which is the subject of the application. (Ord. 2705 § 2, 1997). 5.09.040 Determination of public convenience or necessity – Criteria for consideration. Upon the conclusion of the public hearing, the chief of police may make a determination that public convenience or necessity is or is not served by the issuance of an alcoholic beverage license. The chief of police may condition a determination of public convenience or necessity. This decision may be based upon, but not limited to, the following factors: A. History of the subject business and/or owner. B. Existing conditions at the site or in the vicinity (e.g., potential for creation of a police problem or aggravation of an existing problem). C. The crime rate within the vicinity of the application. (Ord. 2705 § 2, 1997). Page 1 of 2Chapter 5.09 ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSES 11/10/2016http://www.codepublishing.com/CA/ChulaVista/ 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 136 5.09.050 Determination of public convenience or necessity – Appeals. The applicant or other interested party may appeal the decision of the chief of police to the city council within 10 days after said decision is filed with the city clerk. Said appeal shall be in writing and filed with the city clerk upon forms provided by the police department, and shall specify the reasons the appellant believes there was an error in the decision of the chief of police. If an appeal is filed within the time limit specified, it automatically stays proceedings in the matter until a determination is made by the city council. (Ord. 2705 § 2, 1997). 5.09.060 Determination of public convenience or necessity – Appeals – City clerk duties. Upon the filing of the appeal, the city clerk shall set the matter for public hearing, giving the same notice as required in CVMC 5.09.030. The city clerk shall send the chief of police a duplicate copy of the appeal and request the chief of police to transmit to the city council a copy of his decision and findings, minutes of any hearings, and all other evidence, maps, papers, and exhibits upon which the chief of police made his decision. (Ord. 2705 § 2, 1997). Mobile Version Page 2 of 2Chapter 5.09 ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSES 11/10/2016http://www.codepublishing.com/CA/ChulaVista/ 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 137 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 138 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 139 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 140 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 141 Police Department 315 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, California 91910 619-691-5244 April 24th , 2017 Dear Resident or Business Owner: The 7-Eleven is applying for an off-sale beer and wine license at 4230 Bonita Rd in Chula Vista, which is within five hundred feet of your place of business or residence. A public hearing will be held at the Chula Vista Police Department on Tuesday, June 20th, 2017 at 10am. You may voice your protest or support of this alcohol license at the hearing. If you cannot attend the hearing, you may call 619-409- 5852 at any time between now and June 20th, 2017 to speak with a detective about your support or protest of the license. Any protest of this license must be received by the Chula Vista Police Department by June 20th, 2017. We will then determine if an alcohol license meets “Public Convenience or Necessity” for the above location. Thank you for your input, Detective Jesse Vicente Chula Vista Police Department Special Investigations Unit 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 142 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 143 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 144 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 145 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 146 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 147 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 148 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 149 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 150 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 151 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 152 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 153 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 154 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 155 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 156 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 157 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 158 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 159 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 160 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 161 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 162 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 163 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 164 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 165 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 166 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 167 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 168 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 169 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 170 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 171 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 172 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 173 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 174 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 175 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 176 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 177 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 178 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 179 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 180 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 181 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 182 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 183 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 184 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 185 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 186 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 187 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 188 T I PISING i0 TNF CN4LLEIIGE P: 714156018200 www.toit.com July 6, 2017 Kerry Bigelow Acting City Clerk City of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 701 N. Parkcenter Drive, Santa Ana, CA 92705 Re: Appeal of Denial of Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity for 7 -Eleven Store 1039865 Located at 4232 and 4230 A & B Bonita Road, Chula Vista CA 91902 Dear Ms. Kerry: Pursuant of the City of Chula Vista Municipal Code, this letter serves as an appeal to the above referenced case. 1. The specific action appealed: Denial of the Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity made by the Police Department on June 27, 2017 2. Grounds for the appeal: a. Further consideration of the need for 7 -Eleven convenience store to sell beer and wine to be competitive in the convenience store business; b. Total shelf area for the sale of beer and wine is less than five (5) percent of the entire store's shelf area, and is an incidental use to the primary business — beer and wine sales are an added convenience to 7 -Eleven customers. 3. Request that the City Council overturn the Police Chief's decision and find that the incidental sale of beer and wine at the convenience store will serve a public convenience or necessity. Sincerely, Mike MacFarland n C C= vim D n cit Drno rn- 4 rn O 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 189 trr CITY OF CHUTA VISTA POLICE DEPARTMENT Application for Appeal This form is to be used only for the appeal of a decision or finding made by the Chief of Police following a Public Convenience or Necessity Hearing. Instructions: 1. This application must be completed in fall. This application must be filed with the City Clerk within 10 days after the City Clerk has received notice of the Public Convenience or Necessity Hearing decision from the Chief of Police. Failure to file the appeal within 10 days constitutes grounds for closure of the appeal process. The application may be filed by mail, or in person, at: The City of Chula Vista Office of the City Clerk 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 If the appeal application is completed and filed with the City Clerk within the allotted period, the City Clerk shall set the matter for public hearing. You will be notified of the public hearing date and will have the opportunity to argue your case. Public Convenience or Necessity Finding Appeal Applicant's Name: TAIT & Associates - Mike MacFarland Business Name: 7 -Eleven Inc. Business Address: 4232 & 4230 A & B Bonita Rd., Chula Vista CA 91902 Business Telephone Number: 714-560-8385 Please explain how this license would serve public convenience or necessity: Please see attachment for explanation on the following page 315 FOURTH AVENUE . CHULA VISTA, CA 91910 • 619-409-58522017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 190 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 191 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 192 City of Chula Vista Staff Report File#:17-0351, Item#: 9. CONSIDERATION OF ACCEPTANCE OF THE 2017 EDWARD BYRNE MEMORIAL JUSTICE ASSISTANCE GRANT FUNDS RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING $48,868 FROM THE BUREAU OF JUSTICE ASSISTANCE FOR THE 2017 EDWARD BYRNE MEMORIAL JUSTICE ASSISTANCE GRANT RECOMMENDED ACTION Council conduct the public hearing and adopt the resolution. SUMMARY The Police Department has recently received notice of the 2017 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant award in the amount of $48,868 from the Bureau of Justice Assistance. These funds were allocated to the Police Department based on city population and Part 1 violent crime statistics. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Environmental Notice The activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required. Environmental Determination The Director of Development Services has reviewed the proposed activity for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines because it will not result in a physical change in the environment; therefore, pursuant to Section 15060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Thus, no environmental review is required. BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Not Applicable. DISCUSSION Proposed to streamline justice funding and grant administration, the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program allows states, tribes, and local governments to support a broad range of activities to prevent and control crime based on their local needs and conditions. Federal funds from the Edward Byrne Memorial JAG Program must be used to supplement existing funds for program activities and cannot replace, or supplant, nonfederal funds that have been appropriated for the same purpose. The unit of local government must provide an assurance that the application or any future amendment was made public and an opportunity to comment was provided to citizens and City of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 1 of 3 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 193 File#:17-0351, Item#: 9. any future amendment was made public and an opportunity to comment was provided to citizens and the neighborhood or community organizations to the extent of applicable law. Local match is not required with the JAG Program. The Police Department received notice on August 3, 2017, of an Edward Byrne Memorial JAG award in the amount of $48,868 from the Bureau of Justice Assistance. These funds were allocated to the Police Department based on city population and Part 1 violent crime statistics. Part 1 violent crimes include murder and non-negligent manslaughters, forcible rape, robbery, and aggravated assaults as reported by the FBI. Acceptance and appropriation of these funds requires a public hearing per stipulations of the Justice Assistance Grant. The Police Department recommends using the JAG funds for the personnel costs of a Police Community Relations Specialist. The Community Relations Unit was disbanded in the Police Department during previous budget cuts. The Police Community Relations Specialist was reinstated through 2009 American Reinvestment and Recovery Act (ARRA) funds, covering a two-year period of July 2009 to June 2011. When ARRA funds were depleted, JAG funds were used to retain this position. The Police Department is recommending to continue using JAG funds for Police Community Relations Specialist personnel costs during fiscal year 2017/2018. The Police Community Relations Specialist provides a vital link between the community and the Police Department by attending community meetings, coordinating events which involve the community, providing Crime Prevention through Environmental Design assessments for homeowners and businesses, coordinating the annual Citizens Police Academy and the Teen Police Academy, and responds to general inquiries and questions to the Police Department. This position plays an invaluable role serving as the Department’s community liaison. DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT Staff has reviewed the decision contemplated by this action and has determined that it is not site- specific and consequently, the 500-foot rule found in California Code of Regulations Title 2, section 18702.2(a)(11), is not applicable to this decision for purposes of determining a disqualifying real property-related financial conflict of interest under the Political Reform Act (Cal. Gov't Code § 87100, et seq.). Staff is not independently aware, and has not been informed by City Council member, of any other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter. LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS The City’s Strategic Plan has five major goals: Operational Excellence, Economic Vitality, Healthy Community, Strong and Secure Neighborhoods and a Connected Community. Funds received for the Justice Assistance Grant support the goal of Strong and Secure Neighborhoods by providing a vital link between the community and the Police Department. CURRENT YEAR FISCAL IMPACT Approval of this resolution will result in the acceptance of $48,868 for the 2017 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant from the Bureau of Justice Assistance. The annual personnel cost of the Police Community Relations Specialist is approximately $98,415. Funds received by JAG will partially offset the annual personnel costs. The remaining costs will be covered by the General City of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 2 of 3 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 194 File#:17-0351, Item#: 9. will partially offset the annual personnel costs. The remaining costs will be covered by the General Fund, which has been included in the fiscal year 2017/2018 adopted budget. ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT The current proposal provides one-year funding for the position outlined in this report. The Department will seek additional funding in subsequent fiscal years. If no additional funding is obtained, then the position may be eliminated. ATTACHMENTS None. Staff Contact: Maritza Vargas City of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 3 of 3 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 195 RESOLUTION NO. __________ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING $48,868 FROM THE BUREAU OF JUSTICE ASSISTANCE FOR THE 2017 EDWARD BYRNE MEMORIAL JUSTICE ASSISTANCE GRANT WHEREAS, the Police Department received notice from the Bureau of Justice Assistance of the 2017 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant award in the amount of $48,868; and WHEREAS, the grant funding from the Bureau of Justice Assistance for the 2017 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant will be used for the personnel costs of one Police Community Relations Specialist; and WHEREAS, the Police Community Relations Specialist provides a vital link between the community and the Police Department; and WHEREAS, as required by the Justice Assistance Grant program, a public hearing was held to seek input regarding the grant appropriations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, that it accepts $48,868 from the Bureau of Justice Assistance for the 2017 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant. Presented by Approved as to form by Roxana Kennedy Glen R. Googins Police Chief City Attorney 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 196 City of Chula Vista Staff Report File#:17-0357, Item#: 10. CONSIDERATION OF DELISTING THE HERMAN HOTEL CARRIAGE HOUSE SITE FROM THE REGISTER OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS (COA) PERMIT COA16-0007 REQUESTING TO DELIST THE HERMAN HOTEL CARRIAGE HOUSE SITE #17 HISTORICAL RESOURCE FROM THE CHULA VISTA REGISTER OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES RECOMMENDED ACTION Council conduct the public hearing and adopt the resolution. SUMMARY Victor Marmolejo (Applicant) is requesting to delist his property, from its historical resource designation, located at 50 F Street (Attachment 1). The property, also known as the Herman Hotel Carriage House, is currently classified as a historical resource, identified by the 1985 Historical Resources Inventory as Local Historic Site #17. The delisting will enable the Applicant to demolish the Carriage House, and build a new single-family dwelling and detached garage on the property (Project). The Applicant submitted a Major Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) Application Request for Delisting as required by the Historic Preservation Ordinance. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Environmental Notice The Project is not subject to CEQA Section 21084.1, and is therefore exempt from review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15301(l)(1) Existing Facilities (Demolition of Small Structures). Environmental Determination Development Services staff has reviewed the proposed delisting Project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the Carriage House, although originally designated as a local historical resource, no longer meets the eligibility criteria for a historical resource. New evidence demonstrates that the Carriage House’s integrity has diminished, that it was designated inaccurately as substantial structural alterations had changed its appearance, and it no longer physically conveys a historical significance. Furthermore, the Chula Vista Building Official and Fire Marshall have determined that the building is unsafe and a potential threat to public safety. Therefore, the Project is not subject to CEQA Section 21084.1, and is exempt from review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15301(l)(1) Existing Facilities (Demolition of Small Structures); no further CEQA review is required. BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION On July 19, 2017 the City of Chula Vista Historic Preservation Commission unanimously recommended approval of the delisting request to the City Council. City of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 1 of 4 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 197 File#:17-0357, Item#: 10. DISCUSSION In March 2016, the Applicant submitted building plans for a 1,821 square foot, six-car garage. Staff required the Applicant to submit a historic resources report prepared by a historic preservation professional. In June 2016, the Applicant provided a Historical Resource Analysis Report (HRAR) prepared by Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC (Attachment 2). The HRPR states that the Carriage House does not meet any of the California Registry of Historical Resources criteria for designation, and provides evidence which concludes that the Carriage House is not an historical resource, and should not have been designated originally. Therefore, the HRPR made findings to support the recommendation to delist the Carriage House. In 1987, the Carriage House was determined to be a local historical resource as it is the last remaining building associated with the Herman Hotel (circa 1888), and that Minnie Herman, a prominent Chula Vista resident, was responsible for expanding the Herman Hotel in 1894. The Herman Hotel was destroyed by fire in 1916, but was not reconstructed; the Carriage House is the only remaining structure. The Carriage House was altered numerous times, and converted into a house in the 1920s. The historical eligibility for the Carriage House was first documented in the 1985 City of Chula Vista Historic Resources Inventory (HRI) (Attachment 3). The Carriage House was designated as Local Historic Site #17 in 1987, and was subsequently assigned a 5S1 Status Code from the California Register of Historical Resources. According to the California Office of Historic Preservation, a status code is assigned as an action taken, during a specific period of time, to an individual property that is listed or designated as a local historical resource. The 5S1 code is applicable to a property that has not been evaluated under the California and National Registers of Historical Resources criteria, and may not be an accurate status code assignment. The Carriage House’s 1987 designation pre-dates the California Register of Historical Resources which was created in 1992. ANALYSIS The Applicant acquired the property prior to the 2011 adoption of the City of Chula Vista Historic Preservation Ordinance. The Ordinance describes the delisting process when the integrity of a historical resource is in question, and outlines provisions for delisting a historical resource when certain findings can be made. The property was originally identified as an historical resource in a 1985 City survey conducted by staff, as identified on the HRI form; the form states that the Carriage House had prior alterations. Over several decades, and since it was last used as a residence, the historical and structural integrity of the Carriage House have significantly diminished. The HRPR concludes that the Carriage House should not have been listed as an eligible resource, and made the findings for delisting the building as a historical resource. The following text from the City’s Historical Preservation Ordinance provides the required findings for the Historic Preservation Commission’s delisting determination and recommendation to City Council: Delisting 21.05.040 Historical resource delisting - Findings of fact. Delisting of a historical resource shall be discouraged unless it is substantiated through an expert technical analysis that one or more of the following findings of fact exist: City of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 2 of 4 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 198 File#:17-0357, Item#: 10. A. New evidence provided demonstrates that previously identified historical significance of the historical resource has been reduced or no longer exists such that the resource no longer meets the eligibility criteria; B. The resource was designated inaccurately based on incorrect information; C. The integrity of the historical resource or the resource itself has been greatly diminished such that it no longer physically conveys it’s identified historical significance resultant from extensive unintentional damage, fire, flood, or natural disaster. The Carriage House was originally designated because of its association with the Herman Hotel. The Carriage House was not evaluated correctly in 1987, as its association with the Herman Hotel was lost after the hotel was destroyed and never rebuilt; the Carriage House is the only remaining remnant of the hotel complex. The HRAR found that the Carriage House’s historical integrity had diminished prior to the 1987 historical designation, and that it does not convey the 1894-1914 period of significance. Furthermore, it does not meet the local or state criteria for historic resource eligibility. These findings substantiate the reasons for delisting. Staff’s site visit to the property revealed that an apparent unsafe condition and potential hazard exists. The Carriage House’s deteriorating condition was cause for Building and Fire staff to conduct an inspection, and to ascertain if the building’s condition is a risk to public safety. Following the inspection, Building and Fire staff determined that the building is unsafe and poses an immediate hazard. The Building Official prepared a letter explaining the findings for this determination pursuant to Chula Vista Municipal Code (CVMC) 21.09.030 (Attachment 4). CONCLUSION The Carriage House’s historical and physical integrity have diminished, and no longer exhibits historical resource qualities. Furthermore, the building is a hazard and unsafe for habitation in its current condition. DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT Staff has reviewed the property holdings of the City Council members and has not found any property holdings within 500 feet of the property boundaries subject of this action. Consequently, this does not present a disqualifying real property-related financial conflict of interest under California Code of Regulations Title 2, section 18702.2(a)(11), for purposes of the Political Reform Act (Cal. Gov’t Code §87100,et seq.). Staff is not independently aware, and has not been informed by any City Council member of any other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter. LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS The City’s Strategic Plan has five major goals: Operational Excellence, Economic Vitality, Healthy Community, Strong and Secure Neighborhoods and a Connected Community. The delisting and subsequent demolition of the unsafe structure and the future development of the property achieve the strong and secure neighborhood goal. CURRENT YEAR FISCAL IMPACT Staff time on this delisting application was funded by the Applicant’s deposit account. Since thisCity of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 3 of 4 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 199 File#:17-0357, Item#: 10. Staff time on this delisting application was funded by the Applicant’s deposit account. Since this property was not subject to the Mills Act, there is no impact to the property tax revenues as a result of this application. ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT There is no ongoing fiscal impact resulting from the Project’s approval. ATTACHMENTS 1. Location Map 2. HRAR 3. City of Chula Vista Resources Inventory 4. Building Official Letter 5. City Council Resolution 6. Historic Preservation Commission Resolution 7. Historic Preservation Commission Minutes - Draft Staff Contact: Michael Walker, Senior Planner, DSD Advance Planning Division City of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 4 of 4 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 200 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 201 Historical Resource Analysis Report Casa de las Flores Property Carriage House / Garage Building 50 F Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 Prepared For + Submitted To: Victor Marmolejo, Property Owner / Project Applicant + Tim Meyers / Project Architect + City of Chula Vista Development Services Department 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 Prepared By: Wendy L. Tinsley Becker, AICP, Principal Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC www.urbanapreservation.com June 2016 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 202 Historical Resource Analysis Report Casa de la Flores Property Carriage House / Garage Building 50 F Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 June 2016 | ii TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 1 II. Preservation Planning Regulatory Framework ..................................................................................... 2 California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) & Historical Resources ................................... 2 City of Chula Vista Historic Preservation Ordinance ............................................................. 3 Cultural Landscapes ............................................................................................................ 3 Site Analysis: Evaluating the Integrity and Significance of Cultural Landscapes ............. 4 III. Site Narrative and Description ............................................................................................................ 5 Site Development and Uses ................................................................................................. 5 Architectural Characteristics via Available Historic Photographs ......................................... 7 Character-‐Defining / Contributing Features Historically Identified at the Site ................ 8 Current Appearance, Features, and Configuration ............................................................... 8 Remaining Character-‐Defining / Contributing Features at the Site ................................ 8 IV. Eligibility Analysis .............................................................................................................................. 25 Existing Historic Site Designation ........................................................................................ 28 Delisting Findings of Fact ..................................................................................................... 28 V. Historical Resource Conclusions & Recommendations ........................................................................ 30 VI. Works Cited / Endnotes ...................................................................................................................... 31 FIGURES 1-‐14: Historic Maps, Aerial Imagery, and Property Photographs APPENDICES A: Current Photographs (Photos 1-‐33) B: Request for Delisting form (City of Chula Vista Historic Preservation Program Guide Appendix L) 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 203 Historical Resource Analysis Report Casa de la Flores Property Carriage House / Garage Building 50 F Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 June 2016 | 1 I. INTRODUCTION This Historical Resource Analysis Report (HRAR) was prepared by Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC (Urbana) to analyze the historical resource status of a 1-‐1/2 story building at 50 F Street in Chula Vista, California that was formerly utilized as the carriage house / garage for the Casa de las Flores property, a 10-‐ property initially constructed as a private residence and later converted to a hotel that operated between 1894 and 1914. After the hotel property was destroyed by fire in 1916 the carriage house was converted to a private residence. The building at 50 F Street was documented as part of the 1985 City of Chula Vista Historic Resources Inventory. In 1987 the building was designated as Chula Vista Historic Site #17 using the information from the 1985 survey effort. As a result the former Carriage House has been assigned a California Register of Historical Resources Status Code of 5S1, which means it is an individual property that is listed or designated locally. Consequently, for the purposes of all previous discretionary project proposals, the property has been regarded as a historical resource under the guidelines of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). In 2009 Urbana prepared a design review report for a proposed rehabilitation project at the 50 F Street property wherein the property was automatically treated as a historical resource due to its status as Historic Site #17 and the proposed design project was reviewed for conformance with The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation. Urbana’s 2009 report did not provide a conclusion on whether the property remained eligible for designation based on the existing features it exhibited at that time. Additionally Urbana’s report did not detail the development history of the property as it relates to the historic hotel complex in operation from 1894 through 1914. This 2016 HRAR provides additional information on the history of the property, its use and features, and subsequent alteration of the original 10-‐acre Casa de las Flores land area that the 50 F Street property sits within. This HRAR provides a conclusion on the existing historical resource eligibility status of the carriage house / garage building, and was prepared to assist the property owner and the City of Chula Vista on whether the existing carriage house / garage building is a suitable candidate for the designation delisting process pursuant to Chula Vista Municipal Code §21.05.040. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 204 Historical Resource Analysis Report Casa de la Flores Property Carriage House / Garage Building 50 F Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 June 2016 | 2 II. PRESERVATION PLANNING FRAMEWORK Following is an overview of preservation planning regulatory requirements and benefits related to projects proposed at 50 F Street. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) & Historical Resources The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) was enacted in 1970 in order to inform, identify, prevent, and disclose to decision-‐makers and the general public the effects a project may have on the environment. Historical resources are included in the comprehensive definition of the environment under CEQA. Under CEQA a historical resource is defined as: • Any resource listed in or determined eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources by the State Historical Resources Commission; or • Any resource included in a local register of historical resources pursuant to §5020.1 (k) of the California Public Resources Code; or • Any resource identified as significant in a historical resource survey meeting the criteria set forth in §5024.1 (g) of the California Public Resource Code; or • Any object, building, structure, site, area, place, record, or manuscript which a lead agency determines to be historically significant or significant in the architectural, engineering, scientific, economic, agricultural, educational, social, political, military, or cultural annals of California.i CEQA Public Resources Code §21084.1 provides that any project that may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an historical resource is a project that may have a significant effect on the environment. Public Resources Code §5020.1(q) defines “substantial adverse change” as demolition, destruction, relocation, or alteration such that the significance of the historical resource would be impaired. According to Public Resources Code §5024.1, an historical resource is a resource that is listed in, or determined to be eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources; included in a local register of historical resources; or is identified as significant in an historic resource survey if that survey meets specified criteria. California Register of Historical Resources The California Register of Historical Resource (CRHR) is an authoritative guide to California’s significant historical and archaeological resources to be used by state and local agencies, private groups, and citizens in identifying the existing historical resources of the state, and to indicate which resources deserve to be protected, to the extent prudent and feasible, from substantial adverse change. Properties eligible for listing in the CRHR include buildings, structures, objects, or historic districts that retain historic integrity and are historically significant at the local, state or national level under one or more of the following criteria. 1) It is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of local or regional history, or the cultural heritage of California or the United States; or 2) It is associated with the lives of persons important to local, California, or national history; or 3) It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method or construction, or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values; or 4) It has yielded, or has the potential to yield, information important to the prehistory or history of the local area, California, or the nation. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 205 Historical Resource Analysis Report Casa de la Flores Property Carriage House / Garage Building 50 F Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 June 2016 | 3 City of Chula Vista Historic Preservation Ordinance The City of Chula Vista Historic Preservation Ordinance includes eligibility criteria closely modeled after the CRHR. Pursuant to Chula Vista Municipal Code §21.04.100, a property that is at least 45 years old and retains integrity may be eligible for inclusion on the City of Chula Vista Register of Historical Resources if it meets one of the following eligibility criteria. 1. It is associated with an event that is important to prehistory or history on a national, state, regional, or local level. 2. It is associated with a person or persons that have made significant contributions to prehistory or history on a national, state or local level. 3. It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a style, type, period, or method of construction, or represents the work of a master or important, creative individual, and/or possesses high artistic values. 4. It is an outstanding example of a publicly owned historical landscape, that represents the work of a master landscape architect, horticulturist, or landscape designer, or a publicly owned historical landscape that has potential to provide important information to the further study of landscape architecture or history. 5. It has yielded or may be likely to yield information important in prehistory or the history of Chula Vista, the state, region, or nation. Pursuant to Chula Vista Municipal Code §21.05.040, although discouraged, a property may be considered for delisting if the proposed delisting action is substantiated through an expert technical analysis finds that one or more of the following findings of fact exist: A. New evidence provided demonstrates that previously identified historical significance of the historical resource has been reduced or no longer exists such that the resource no longer meets the eligibility criteria; or B. The resource was designated inaccurately based on incorrect information; or C. The integrity of the historical resource or the resource itself has been greatly diminished such that it no longer physically conveys its identified historical significance resultant from extensive unintentional damage, fire, flood, or natural disaster. Cultural Landscapes A Cultural Landscape is defined as a geographic area including both cultural and natural resources and the wildlife or domestic animals therein, associated with a historic event, activity, or person or exhibiting other cultural or aesthetic values.ii There are four general types of cultural landscapes not mutually exclusive: 1. Historic Site – A landscape significant for its association with a historic event, activity, or person. Examples include battlefields and president’s house properties. 2. Historic Designed Landscapes – A landscape that was consciously designed or laid out by a 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 206 Historical Resource Analysis Report Casa de la Flores Property Carriage House / Garage Building 50 F Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 June 2016 | 4 landscape architect, master gardener, architect, or horticulturist according to design principles, or an amateur gardener working in a recognized style or tradition. The landscape may be associated with a significant person(s), trend, or event in landscape architecture; or illustrate an important development in the theory and practice of landscape architecture. Aesthetic values play a significant role in designed landscapes. Examples include parks, campuses, and estates. 3. Historic Vernacular Landscapes – A landscape that has evolved through use by the people whose activities or occupancy shaped the landscape. Through social or cultural attitudes of an individual, family, or a community, the landscape reflects the physical, biological, and cultural character of those everyday lives. Function plays a significant role in vernacular landscapes. They can be a single property such as a farm or collection of properties such as a district of historic farms along the river valley. Examples include rural villages, industrial complexes, and agricultural landscapes. 4. Ethnographic Landscapes – A landscape containing a variety of natural and cultural resources that associated people define as heritage resources. Examples are contemporary settlements, religious sacred sites and massive geological structures. Small plant communities, animals, subsistence and ceremonial grounds are often components. Site Analysis: Evaluating Integrity and Significance of Cultural Landscapes Historic significance is the recognized importance a property displays when it has been evaluated, including when it has been found to meet National Register criteria. An understanding of the landscape as a continuum through history is critical in assessing its cultural and historic value. Integrity is a property’s historic identity evidenced by the survival of physical characteristics from the property’s historic or prehistoric period. In order for a cultural or historic landscape to have integrity, the character-‐defining features or qualities that contribute to its significance must be present.iii The seven aspects of integrity are: • Location: The place where the cultural landscape was constructed or where the historical event occurred. • Setting: The physical environment of the cultural landscape. • Feeling: An expression of the aesthetic or historic sense of a time period. • Association: A direct link between an historic event or person. • Design: A combination of elements that create form, plan, space, structure, and style. • Workmanship: Physical evidence of craft of a particular time, culture or people. • Materials: Physical elements that remain from the period of significance. iv Characteristics or attributes of cultural landscapes may include: • Spatial organization / land use patterns, • Circulation patterns, • Historic-‐era or contemporary-‐period architecture, • Topography, • Historic-‐era or contemporary-‐period vegetation, plantings, and tree palette, • Hardscape improvements, • Natural systems, and • Views / vistas.v Identified characteristics should correspond to the period of significance identified for an intact cultural landscape. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 207 Historical Resource Analysis Report Casa de la Flores Property Carriage House / Garage Building 50 F Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 June 2016 | 5 III. SITE NARRATIVE AND DESCRIPTION The subject site is defined as an approximate .67-‐acre land area bound by neighboring lots that line the south side of F Street, the west side of Hilltop Drive, the northwest side of Roseview Place, the north side of Center Street, and homes built within an approximate 630’ depth east from 1st Avenue between F Street and Center Street. The site was once part of a larger 10-‐acre plot comprising Lots 20 and 21 within Section 124 of the San Diego Land & Town Company Chula Vista town site. Due to a series of land subdivisions and re-‐subdivisions, the parcel is identified as a Flag Lot or Panhandle Lot as referenced in the Chula Vista Municipal Code. The 50 F Street property is identified as Assessors Parcel Number 569-‐171-‐18-‐00. Site Development and Uses The property presently identified as 50 F Street was originally developed as a private residence for Englishman George W. Roberts who arrived in the Chula Vista and National City area in 1879 where he represented real estate holdings and land development projects for the Southern California Railroad Company out of National City. In 1886 Roberts retired from the railroad and went into business for himself selling real estate and insurance. In 1887-‐1888 Roberts commissioned the design and construction of his residence, which he called Los Flores or ‘The Flowers’. The identity of the original architect and builder for Los Flores is unknown, however, one likely assertion is that architect Charles J. Zeugheer-‐Herman, an Englishman who maintained an office in National City, may have designed the home as San Diego City and County Directories disclose that by 1888 Herman and Roberts maintained their respective architecture and real estate offices at the same building in National City on 7th Avenue between 22nd and 23rd Streets.vi Herman had also by 1888 become a brother-‐in-‐law to George Roberts, having married Minnie Roberts, George’s sister who immigrated to the United States with her brother in 1879.vii Roberts time at Los Flores was brief. In August 1888 he passed after a short period of illness and exhaustion, leaving the home to his sister Minnie who continued to use the property as a private residence with her husband Charles until 1894 when the dwelling was expanded with 13 additional bedrooms and was renamed Casa de las Flores. By 1900 Minnie Roberts converted Casa de las Flores to a hotel open for visitors and boarding. Advertised as an attraction for eastern United States residents, the hotel is reputed to have offered many recreational and cultural amenities including a tennis court, bowling alley, and golf course (in some form), as well as piano concerts hosted by Minnie Herman.viii In November 1904 the Herman’s hired a married couple, the Barbers, to serve as the caretakers / innkeepers for the hotel.ix In November 1905 Minnie Herman leased the hotel to Mrs. Frederick of London, England and promptly announced her retirement from hotel service.x Minnie’s retirement is assumed to correlate to the unexpected death of her husband, Charles J. Herman in March 1905. Subsequent to Minnie’s tenure as the property caretaker, the hotel was rebranded as the Highland Hotel and was purchased by M.L. Webb, who undertook an improvement campaign for the former estate. These improvements, however, do not appear to have resulted in a financially successful enterprise as the former Casa de las Flores property was sold through auction in September 1914. Advertisements for the auction describe the property as follows. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 208 Historical Resource Analysis Report Casa de la Flores Property Carriage House / Garage Building 50 F Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 June 2016 | 6 On the Auction Block This magnificent property, situated in the most beautiful part of Chula Vista, known as “Walhalla Ranch,” formerly “Casa de Las Flores” of the Herman place. Will be sold by the sheriff Friday, September 18, at 9:30 a.m., in front of Court House. This property is ideal for a Sanitarium or Hotel And is equipped for a fancy Dairy and Poultry Farm. This Property Consists of 10 acres and improvements and was purchased by Miss M.L. Webb several years ago for $25,000. Since then she has added improvements which cost her $15,000 bringing the value to $40,000. The main building has 28 rooms, 14 outside doors, 5 modern baths, 1 washroom, 2 Solar heaters, 16-point bell system, motors in laundry, is newly painted and wired, wiring place cost $750. Call and inspect please. Other improvements are as follows: Two 5-room one 4-room and one 1-room modern cottages, with baths, Solar heater electricity and gas costing $3,000, garage and stable remodeled at a cost of $1500, one greenhouse, two summer houses costing $1400, corrals and poultry runs costing $550. Buy at your own price.xi The property was purchased at auction by R.J. Clarke of National City (also identified as T.J.), who apparently left the old hotel building and associated dwellings vacant and the surrounding support structures unused.xii In 1916 the hotel and at least some of its outbuildings were destroyed by fire.xiii Newspaper accounts detail the event. Fire Destroys Highland Hotel at Chula Vista Loss on 30-room structure estimated $20,000; nearby buildings threatened. Fire of undiscovered origin last night destroyed the old Highland Hotel, a thirty-room frame structure at Sixth and F Streets, Chula Vista and for two hours threatened to sweep over the big residence of Hamilton B. Clark and three cottages only a few hundred feet distant. The old hotel building was furnished and owned by Captain R.J. Clarke of National City. Damage is estimated at between $15,000 and $20,000. The building has been closed for more than a year. The fire was discovered in the basement about 10 o’clock. The flames spread quickly over the dry wooden walls and ceilings and in a few minutes the building was in a mass of flames. The Chula Vista fire department in charge of Harry Boutelle, poured streams of water on the Clark home and the nearby cottages to prevent them from being ignited by the sparks which were carried from the burning hotel by a strong wind. Practically every male resident of Chula Vista and scores from National City, attracted by the glare, hurried to the scene and formed a volunteer fire-fighting corps, confining their efforts to saving the houses that were threatened, all hopes of saving the old hotel having been abandoned. When the flames had been brought under control, about midnight, all that remained of the hotel were two chimneys. The building was formerly known as the Highland Hotel and later as the Hotel Webb. M.L. Webb of Chula Vista having had charge of it until about a year ago. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 209 Historical Resource Analysis Report Casa de la Flores Property Carriage House / Garage Building 50 F Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 June 2016 | 7 Two companies of apparatus from the San Diego fire department started for Chula Vista to assist in fighting the flames but returned to their stations before leaving the city limits on learning that there was no hope of saving the hotel.xiv Two months after the fire the old hotel property was sold to Harvey Dunton of Colorado Springs, Colorado.xv With the intent to build, Dunton subdivided the original 10-‐acre property between 1920 and 1921. The home at 48 F Street, located immediately north of the 50 F Street building, was constructed in 1911.xvi Surrounding homes on F Street within the original 10-‐acre land area were built incrementally between 1920 and 1930. The south side of the property, fronting present-‐day Tidelands Street, was developed with a single-‐family home in 1920. This parcel, identified as 360 Hilltop Drive, appears to demarcate the southern end of the original 10-‐acre land area. Amidst the land subdivision activity, William and Maggie Boyd acquired the 50 F Street property with the subject building in December 1923. The Boyds retained ownership until 1944 when the property was acquired by Willis and Eloise Nance. By 1953 the former Casa de las Flores property remained essentially undeveloped at its core. The land area where the house-‐turned-‐hotel burned was vacant. Structures sited behind the carriage house at that time are presumed to have been poultry runs and other miscellaneous agricultural buildings installed by the Boyds or the Nances. By 1964 the poultry runs and other miscellaneous buildings were removed and replaced by single-‐family dwellings built as part of a limited unit residential subdivision project. Additional residential development occurred in the 1950s and 1960s at the south end of the former hotel property, which resulted in the nearly all of the original 10-‐acre plot being redeveloped with single-‐family construction. Architectural Characteristics via Available Historic Photographs The earliest view of Casa de las Flores dates to circa 1888-‐1890s. Included as Figure 7, this early photograph provides a view of the house with limited views of the surrounding property. The property appears to be relatively undeveloped with outbuildings and ancillary structures. The home was accessible via a graded drive from F Street that transitioned into a circular drive planted initially with grass and palm trees. To the west of the house, the land area was planted with daisies and wild flowers. The Union Title and Trust Company photographed the residence in 1897, presumably for the purposes of insurance and its new use as a hotel. Taken from the eastern side of the circular driveway, the 1897 view includes what is presumed to be the east elevation (at left) and the north elevation (at right) of the home, and an ancillary structure that appears to be a carriage building / garage. This ancillary structure appears to be setback from the southwest corner of the main building. In the 1897 photograph, included as Figure 9, the Victorian style dwelling-‐turned-‐hotel featured a principal hipped roof articulated by multiple pinnacle-‐and-‐spire-‐topped front gabled dormers at multiple planes, tall and slender corbelled brick chimneys, multiple wraparound porches at the ground floor, and second level balconies featuring spindle work balustrades. Also captured in the 1897 photograph is a modestly scaled ancillary building covered by an equilateral hipped standing seam roof with pinnacle and finial, and featuring paired cornice brackets, three upper-‐level ox eye windows visible at the front facade, and an open porch at the ground level featuring three visible arched bays. This secondary building is reputed to have served as the carriage house for the hotel and is the existing modified building at the 50 F Street property. In 1910 the hotel building was again photographed from nearly the same vantage point as the 1897 Union Title and Trust. The property landscaping included the same circular drive planted with grass, beds of daisies, and olive trees at the northeast corner of the circular drive. The olive trees demarcated a second graded path that served as a second access / egress route from the front of the home. A new building is slightly 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 210 Historical Resource Analysis Report Casa de la Flores Property Carriage House / Garage Building 50 F Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 June 2016 | 8 discernible in the 1910 image – the building appears to have been constructed in front of the carriage house with a gable roof and a lower overhang which may been part of a porch structure. The new building may have been one of the cottages built at the property when it was owned by M.L. Webb and / or in operation as the Highland Hotel. Similarly, although not captured in historic photographs, the house located at 48 F Street, immediately north of the 50 F Street property, was constructed in 1911, during the period that the hotel property was active and operating, and may be one of the cottages or summer homes built on the property. Character-‐Defining / Contributing Features Identified Historically at the Site The features and conditions of the site determined to be character-‐defining through its use history are identified as follows. • A rectilinear 10-‐acre land area bound by present-‐day F Street to the north, Hilltop Drive to the east, and Tidelands Street to the south. • Main Hotel Building built as a Victorian style private residence in 1888 and converted to a hotel in 1894. • Five-‐room cottage #1 • Five-‐room cottage #2 • Four-‐room cottage • One-‐room cottage • Summerhouse #1 • Summerhouse #2 • Carriage House / garage • Circular driveway • Access drive #1 • Access drive #2 • Poultry Run(s) • Corral(s) Additionally, the property is reported in one local historic publication as having featured a tennis court and golf course on the grounds. These features were not referenced in the materials describing the property in preparation for the 1914 auction, and as such are not formally included in the list of character-‐defining / contributing features. Current Appearance, Features, and Configuration Excepting the 50 F Street parcel, the former hotel property is completely infilled with single-‐family residential development built between circa 1911 and 1970. Dimensions of the 50 F Street property are roughly 166’ x 178’ or .67-‐acre within the historic 10-‐acre plot that Casa de las Flores was developed on. None of the buildings, structures, or landscape improvements remain from the historic hotel property’s 1894-‐1914 period of use and significance. Remaining Character-‐Defining / Contributing Features at the Site • Carriage House Today the former carriage house features a rectilinear plan comprised of a 1 ½-‐story central block covered by an equilateral hipped roof with standing seam metal roofing, and flanked on each side by a single-‐story hipped roof wing. The extended cupola-‐with-‐weathervane pictured in the 1897 view is no longer extant. The entire building is clad in horizontal board siding measuring either 6 ¾” or 9”. The central block appears 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 211 Historical Resource Analysis Report Casa de la Flores Property Carriage House / Garage Building 50 F Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 June 2016 | 9 to be the original carriage house, with original eave brackets extant around the perimeter. The three oxeye windows observed at the building in the 1897 photograph are not extant and have been replaced by three rectangular windows each featuring louvered glass slats. The original ground floor opening pictured in the 1897 view was enclosed with an exterior wall, and a framed screened-‐in porch was added to the front facade. The porch features a flat roof covered in composition roll roofing and spans the length of the building’s central volume. The east wing has been extended via a shed roof addition with composition roll roofing. A brick chimney has been installed at the northeast corner of the east wing addition. The east wing does not appear to sit on a foundation. Extensive wood rot is visible. The origins of the west wing are inexact although the volume was likely built as part of the original construction campaign. The west wing features a concrete floor with a mechanic’s pit. The facade is enclosed by two wooden doors attached with large iron hinges at the outer edge of each door. The entire rear elevation appears to have been altered through the decades through insertion of doors and windows and by a second shed roof addition appended to the south elevation at the southeast corner. Overall the building is in poor exterior and interior condition. It retains minimal integrity with respect to the seven aspects of integrity. Historic maps and imagery, and contemporary views of the 50 F Street property are included as Figures 1-‐14 in the following pages. Current photos of the property (Photos 1-‐33) are included as Appendix A. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 212 Historical Resource Analysis Report Casa de la Flores Property Carriage House / Garage Building 50 F Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 June 2016 | 10 Figure 1: Location of the Casa de las Flores property within the 1894 plat of Chula Vista. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 213 Historical Resource Analysis Report Casa de la Flores Property Carriage House / Garage Building 50 F Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 June 2016 | 11 Figure 2: Location of Casa de las Flores within the 1904 USGS San Diego Quadrangle. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 214 Historical Resource Analysis Report Casa de la Flores Property Carriage House / Garage Building 50 F Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 June 2016 | 12 Figure 3: Location of Casa de las Flores within the 1930 USGS San Diego Quadrangle. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 215 Historical Resource Analysis Report Casa de la Flores Property Carriage House / Garage Building 50 F Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 June 2016 | 13 Figure 4: Location of Casa de las Flores within the 1944 USGS San Diego Quadrangle. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 216 Historical Resource Analysis Report Casa de la Flores Property Carriage House / Garage Building 50 F Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 June 2016 | 14 Figure 5: Location of Casa de las Flores within the 1953 USGS San Diego Quadrangle. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 217 Historical Resource Analysis Report Casa de la Flores Property Carriage House / Garage Building 50 F Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 June 2016 | 15 Figure 6: Location of Casa de las Flores within the 1967 USGS San Diego Quadrangle. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 218 Historical Resource Analysis Report Casa de la Flores Property Carriage House / Garage Building 50 F Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 June 2016 | 16 Figure 7: View of Casa de las Flores, circa 1888-‐1890s. The identity of the man included in the view is unknown. This image shows the front elevation of the residence-‐turned-‐hotel building and the western portion of the circular drive with one visible access path. Planted flowerbeds and maintained fields are also in view. Source: San Diego History Center Photo Album 209 “Chula Vista Family Photo Album”. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 219 Historical Resource Analysis Report Casa de la Flores Property Carriage House / Garage Building 50 F Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 June 2016 | 17 Figure 8: View from Casa de las Flores, likely view northwesterly. Source: San Diego History Center Photo No. 694. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 220 Historical Resource Analysis Report Casa de la Flores Property Carriage House / Garage Building 50 F Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 June 2016 | 18 Figure 9: 1897 Union Title and Trust Company photograph of Casa de las Flores showing the main hotel building (east elevation at left and north elevation at right), the carriage house / garage building (at right in the background), the circular drive, and surrounding landscape features. Source: San Diego History Center Photo No. 693. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 221 Historical Resource Analysis Report Casa de la Flores Property Carriage House / Garage Building 50 F Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 June 2016 | 19 Figure 10: Detailed zoom of the 1897 Union Title and Trust Company photograph of Casa de las Flores showing the main hotel building, the carriage house / garage building, and the circular drive. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 222 Historical Resource Analysis Report Casa de la Flores Property Carriage House / Garage Building 50 F Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 June 2016 | 20 Figure 11: Circa 1910 view of Casa de las Flores, which is erroneously identified in the corresponding caption as the Charles Herman Hotel. Charles Herman died in early 1905. Minnie Herman resigned from her innkeeper role in November 1905. The trees in the foreground are olive trees. A new building appears to have been constructed in the background between the hotel and the carriage house. The eastern portion of the circular drive access path is also visible. Source: San Diego History Center Photo No. 16179. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 223 Historical Resource Analysis Report Casa de la Flores Property Carriage House / Garage Building 50 F Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 June 2016 | 21 Figure 12: 1939 aerial view of Chula Vista with the former Casa de las Flores property in the background. By 1939 new residential lots were developed along the south side of F Street within the boundaries of the 10-‐ acre historic hotel complex. The carriage house / garage building is demarcated by the red circle. The cleared land area immediately south of the carriage house appears to be used for poultry runs and other associated structures. Source: San Diego History Center Photo No. 10282. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 224 Historical Resource Analysis Report Casa de la Flores Property Carriage House / Garage Building 50 F Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 June 2016 | 22 Figure 13: 1953 aerial view of Chula Vista with the former Casa de las Flores property in the background. The property is notated in orange. The carriage house / garage building is sited in the middle of the former 10-‐ acre land area, at the western edge. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 225 Historical Resource Analysis Report Casa de la Flores Property Carriage House / Garage Building 50 F Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 June 2016 | 23 Figure 14: 1953 Aerial view of the Casa de las Flores property. The 10-‐acre parcel is outlined in red. The existing carriage house / garage building is outlined in green. The southwest corner of the land area appears to contain poultry runs and related structures. New dwellings built between circa 1911 and 1930 front F Street at the northern property boundary. Source: National Environmental Title Research HistoricAerials.com 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 226 Historical Resource Analysis Report Casa de la Flores Property Carriage House / Garage Building 50 F Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 June 2016 | 24 Figure 15: Circa 2016 aerial view of the Casa de las Flores property. The 10-‐acre parcel is outlined in red. The existing carriage house / garage building is outlined in green. Source: Google Earth. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 227 Historical Resource Analysis Report Casa de la Flores Property Carriage House / Garage Building 50 F Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 June 2016 | 25 IV. ELIGIBILITY ANALYSIS CHRH and Local Criterion 1 It is associated with events or patterns of events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of local or regional history, or the cultural heritage of California or the United States. Based on an analysis of the land area, its ownership and use history, and integrity comprised of present-‐day configuration and features, the subject property at 50 F Street does not appear to be eligible for listing on the California Register under Criterion 1 as an intact cultural landscape or historic district associated with or representing Casa de las Flores, the Herman Hotel, or the Highland Hotel during the property’s identified 1894-‐1914 period of use and significance. At its peak period of activity between circa 1894 and 1914, the Casa de las Flores / Herman Hotel / Highland Hotel property featured the main hotel building, six separate dwellings, a carriage house / garage, poultry runs, animal corrals, and landscape components including a circular driveway with two access roads, a planned landscape featuring fruit and olive trees, and various flowers beds. The existing carriage house was one of eight buildings that comprised the hotel complex. When landscape elements are included, the count of contributing features expands to at least 13. In its current integrity and condition, the 50 F Street property and the single remaining carriage house building does not adequately or accurately convey the history, appearance, development patterns, or associations of the former hotel property during the 1894-‐1914 period of significance and use. The property’s size, shape, plan, and features were destroyed by fire in 1916, and then continually eroded and modified as land subdivision and re-‐subdivision activities occurred and new homes were constructed incrementally throughout the historic 10-‐acre land area. As an individual building, the carriage house does not retain integrity to the 1894-‐1914 period of significance associated with the historic hotel property. It was one of at least eight buildings constructed at the property including the main hotel building and six separate dwellings, and is one of at least 13 contributing elements when landscape features are also considered. The carriage house, in and of itself, does not convey the historic land development patterns or land uses in the 1894-‐1914 period, and as a secondary structure or outbuilding that served as the garage for property, the building does not individually convey a direct association with the destroyed and long demolished historic hotel complex. Additionally, the hotel building was completely destroyed by fire in 1916. The proximity of the carriage house to the main hotel building as evidenced in the 1897 view suggests that the carriage house building may have been damaged and extensively repaired or altered if indeed the fire was as severe as described in newspaper accounts. Relative to the 1916 fire, the status of the other dwellings constructed as part of the hotel complex is not known. The buildings may have been (and are presumed to have been) destroyed by fire; however, it is unclear how the existing carriage house in such close proximity to the main hotel building would have been spared without damage that necessitated substantial alterations and repairs. Due to the property’s continual loss of contributing elements, there is no visible cultural landscape or historic district that qualifies for California Register Criterion 1. Similarly, the carriage house does not individually qualify under Criterion 1 as it was a secondary structure or outbuilding for the main hotel building, and no longer resembles its historic appearance from the 1894-‐1914 period of significance for the property. No specific events are directly associated to the building relative to the historical activities that are reputed to have occurred at the property during the 1894-‐1914 period. For these reasons Urbana cannot issue a positive statement of eligibility for the 50 F Street property relative to California Register Criterion 1. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 228 Historical Resource Analysis Report Casa de la Flores Property Carriage House / Garage Building 50 F Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 June 2016 | 26 CHRH and Local Criterion 2 It is associated with the lives of persons important to local, California, or national history. No information was identified to assist in the successful determination of eligibility for the 50 F Street property to be considered significant under California Register criterion 2 relative to past owners or occupants associated with the property. The building was an outbuilding for the Casa de las Flores hotel property and later was converted to a private dwelling. Casa de las Flores was initially constructed as Los Flores, the private residence of George W. Roberts, who could be considered as an important person in Chula Vista business and real estate activities during his brief residency in the area from 1879-‐1888. No features exist at 50 F Street that date to the 1879-‐1888 period. Therefore, there is no tangible association with George W. Roberts at the property. The property was later owned and occupied by Charles and Minnie Herman. Charles Herman is identified as an Architect who may have designed Los Flores and the subsequent additions to convert the residence to Casa de las Flores, although no specific records were identified to substantiate this assertion, or to document his other design projects. Charles Herman died in 1905. Minnie Herman worked as the innkeeper / caretaker of Casa de las Flores until November 1905 when she retired. Little information was identified for Minnie Herman after her 1905 retirement. The 50 F Street property is not adequately associated with Charles and Minnie Herman as the property only contains the former carriage house building, an ancillary structure for the main hotel building, where presumably as owners with hired staff, the Herman’s would not have spent much time or directed activities from. As an individual building, the carriage house does not retain integrity to the 1894-‐1914 period of significance associated with the historic hotel property. It is one of at least eight buildings constructed at the property including the main hotel building and six separate dwellings, and is one of at least 13 contributing elements when landscape features are also considered. No information was identified to directly associate the carriage house to important accomplishments achieved by George W. Roberts or the Minnie and Charles Herman such that the building could be identified as individually eligible. For these reasons Urbana cannot issue a positive statement of eligibility for the 50 F Street property relative to California Register Criterion 2. CHRH and Local Criterion 3 It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values. Based on an analysis of the land area, its ownership and use history, and integrity comprised of present-‐day configuration and features, the subject property at 50 F Street does not appear to be eligible for listing on the California Register under Criterion 3 as an intact cultural landscape or historic district associated with or representing Casa de las Flores, the Herman Hotel, or the Highland Hotel during the property’s identified 1894-‐1914 period of use and significance. The main hotel building was initially constructed in 1888 as a private residence in the Victorian style. It was expanded in 1894 with similar Victorian details. The building was destroyed by fire in 1916 and no longer exists. The carriage house / garage building was constructed with limited Victorian features including a series of spindled posts and brackets at the ground floor garage openings, shiplap siding, a prominent cupola-‐with-‐weather vane atop the hipped roof, three oxeye windows, and scrolled brackets. The building was modified via removal of the cupola-‐and-‐weather vane, all spindlework and spindled posts, and the three 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 229 Historical Resource Analysis Report Casa de la Flores Property Carriage House / Garage Building 50 F Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 June 2016 | 27 oxeye windows; and installation of contemporary horizontal board siding in differing dimensions; the addition of a new volume and chimney at the east elevation and a pop-‐out at the south elevation; new louvered windows at the front elevation; new openings for windows and doors at the south elevation; and installation of a full-‐length front porch that is framed and screened-‐in and spans the length of the building’s central block. The separate dwellings constructed at the hotel property – four cottages and two summer homes – were likely built in a Victorian or early Arts & Crafts / Craftsman style. These buildings were likely destroyed by fire in 1916 and no longer exist. The landscape features once in place at the property included: a circular drive with two access paths, flowerbeds, olive and fruit trees, poultry runs and animal corrals. Additionally, the hotel property was cited as having a golf course. None of these features exist today and are presumed to have been destroyed by fire in 1916 or gradually eroded and removed as part of subsequent land subdivision and residential development activity throughout the former 10-‐acre land area. The 50 F Street property is not eligible under California Register Criterion 3 for embodying the distinctive characteristics of a Victorian-‐period hotel complex, nor is the carriage house individually eligible as a significant example of Victorian-‐era construction. The building is modified such that it scarcely resembles its 1894-‐1914 appearance as represented in a single 1897 photograph. For these reasons Urbana cannot issue a positive statement of eligibility for the 50 F Street property relative to California Register Criterion 3. Local Register Criterion 4 It is an outstanding example of a publicly owned historical landscape, that represents the work of a master landscape architect, horticulturist, or landscape designer, or a publicly owned historical landscape that has potential to provide important information to the further study of landscape architecture or history. The 50 F Street property is a privately owned property and therefore is not eligible for consideration under Local Register Criterion 4. Additionally, the property does not retain integrity to the 1894-‐1914 period of significance, and when observed today, no longer represents an intact cultural landscape or historic hotel complex replete with buildings, structures, and landscape features. CHRH Criterion 4 and Local Register Criterion 5 It has yielded, or has the potential to yield, information important to the prehistory or history of the local area, state or the nation. The surrounding lots that once comprised the 10-‐acre historic hotel property were developed from circa 1911-‐1970 with individual residences. The land area has been graded and disturbed continually as each of these individual parcels were developed. It is unknown if archaeological artifacts relating to the historic hotel uses were identified during these various construction projects. In its current condition, appearance, level of integrity and single remaining / eroded character-‐defining feature (the modified carriage house), the 50 F Street property has not yielded information important to the prehistory or history of Chula Vista, San Diego County, California or the nation, nor does the building appear to have the potential to yield information important to the prehistory or history of Chula Vista, San Diego County, California or the nation. Beyond what is discussed in this report, barring additional information being discovered for the property, the 50 F Street property does not appear likely to yield additional information important to the history or prehistory of the local area, state or the nation. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 230 Historical Resource Analysis Report Casa de la Flores Property Carriage House / Garage Building 50 F Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 June 2016 | 28 Existing Historic Site Designation The former carriage house building at 50 F Street was surveyed in 1985 and designated in 1987 as City of Chula Vista Historic Site #17. A Historic Resources Inventory form completed for the building identified the building as being significant as “one of the last remains of the Herman Hotel” and identified the building as “considerably altered”. Alterations listed on the 1985 survey form are: “windows altered; room additions”. Related features identified on the 1985 survey form are: “stablekeeper’s house and barn foundation nearby”. The barn foundation does not appear to exist. The stable keeper’s house may be the 48 F Street property, if that property is not one of the summer homes constructed as part of hotel improvements. The 48 F Street property has been entirely modified at the front facade such that it no longer resembles its 1911 appearance. The property’s existing designation as the last remaining building for the hotel property is tenuous. Research has identified that the subject building was a secondary structure having served as the garage for the hotel complex. The historic hotel complex was in use from circa 1894-‐1914. During that period, the property was improved with separate cottages and summerhouses around the main hotel building, and featured planned landscape elements that offered scenic, recreational, and utilitarian uses. The single remaining building equates to approximately 1/13 of the improvements and features at the property during the 1894-‐1914 period of significance. The building has been modified from its historic appearance and was acknowledged as modified in the 1985 survey documentation that informed the designation decision. Delisting Findings of Fact The 50 F Street property is suitable for delisting from the City of Chula Vista Historical Resources Register based on the following findings of fact. 1. The building was designated for its association with the Herman Hotel, as the last existing building associated with the property. The long-‐destroyed hotel property and its associated contributing elements were built and in use as a hotel from 1894 through 1914. The carriage house building does not retain adequate integrity to the 1894-‐1914 period of significance identified for the hotel property and its contributing features, nor did it retain integrity when it was designated. 2. The building’s significance would be derived from its role as a contributing element to the historic hotel complex in place from circa 1894-‐1914, not as an individual property. The hotel complex is no longer intact. A single modified building that provided a secondary use cannot adequately represent this historic hotel property. 3. As the sole remaining feature within the boundaries of the 10-‐acre historic hotel complex, the building at 50 F Street does not convey the historical events, development patterns, architectural qualities, or spatial and landscape characteristics once associated with the historic hotel property. 4. At the time of designation, the building at 50 F Street did not adequately convey or represent the 1894-‐1914 period of significance identified for the hotel property, and as such, the designation should not have occurred. 5. The building has not been found eligible, either individually or as part of a landscape or historic district, under California Register Criterion 1 or Local Register Criterion 1 relating to important events or patterns of events. 6. The building has not been found eligible, either individually or as part of a landscape or historic district, under California Register Criterion 2 or Local Register Criterion 2 relating to important persons. 7. The building has not been found eligible, either individually or as part of a landscape or historic district, under California Register Criterion 3 or Local Register Criterion 3 relating to a type, period, region, or method of construction. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 231 Historical Resource Analysis Report Casa de la Flores Property Carriage House / Garage Building 50 F Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 June 2016 | 29 8. The building has not been found eligible, either individually or as part of a landscape or historic district, under Local Register Criterion 4 relating to a publicly owned historic cultural landscape or a privately owned cultural landscape. 9. The building has not been found eligible, either individually or as part of a landscape or historic district, under California Register Criterion 4 or Local Register Criterion 5 relating to further study and the ability to yield additional information in the future. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 232 Historical Resource Analysis Report Casa de la Flores Property Carriage House / Garage Building 50 F Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 June 2016 | 30 V. HISTORICAL RESOURCE CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS The 50 F Street property includes a single remaining building from the 10-‐acre Casa de las Flores hotel property. This building served as a carriage house / garage during the hotel property’s 1894-‐1914 period of significance. Previous survey efforts (1985 survey) and design review analysis (Urbana 2009) did not disclose the extent of development at the 10-‐acre complex, nor was the total number of buildings, structures, and landscape features identified as part of the survey and subsequent designation effort. In light of new evidence identified during the course of historical research for this HRAR, wherein the development history of the Casa de las Flores property was more fully understood to include extensive improvements beyond the main hotel building and a carriage house / garage and wherein said research provided for the establishment of a period of significance for the property, the carriage house / garage building is not eligible for listing on the CRHR or for the Local Register. At its height the property featured the main hotel building, two five-‐room cottages, one four-‐room cottage, one one-‐room cottage, two summerhouses, the subject carriage house / garage building, and landscape features including a circular drive with two access roads, planted fruit and olive trees, flowerbeds, corrals and poultry runs, and reportedly, a golf course, the 50 F Street property comprised of the single remaining modified carriage house / garage building. The remaining modified carriage house / garage building represents 1/13th of the documented hotel complex, and the hotel property itself covered 10-‐acres of land, whereas today the 50 F Street property includes less than one acre and the surrounding environs have been drastically changed through residential development. After the hotel property was destroyed by fire, the carriage house was converted for use as a private dwelling and was subsequently modified over time. The building no longer exhibits its historic appearance from the 1894-‐1914 period of significance as observed in an 1897 photograph. The building does not adequately convey the history or potential significance of the hotel complex, as it existed in the 1894-‐1914 period. The building has not been found individually eligible relative to its existing architectural characteristics. For these reasons, the 50 F Street property is eligible for delisting consideration under the City of Chula Vista Municipal Code §21.05.040 and no longer qualifies as a historical resource pursuant to Public Resources Code §5024.1 and §15064.5 of the associated CEQA Guidelines. A City of Chula Vista Request for Delisting form is included as Appendix B. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 233 Historical Resource Analysis Report Casa de la Flores Property Carriage House / Garage Building 50 F Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 June 2016 | 31 VI. WORKS CITED / ENDNOTES i C.C.R. Title 14, Chapter 3, Article 5, §15064.5 (a)(1-3). ii Preservation Brief 36 Protecting Cultural Landscapes: Planning, Treatment and Management of Historic Landscapes. iii Ibid, 10. iv National Register Bulletin 15: How to Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation. v May, Vonn Marie. Cultural Landscapes Workshop. Presented to the City of Chula Vista Historic Preservation Commission, November 20, 2013. vi San Diego City and County Directories, Chula Vista/National City, 1887-1890. vii Chula Vista Heritage, 1911-1986, 13. viii Chula Vista Heritage, 1911-1986, 14. ix “Chula Vista Notes – Mrs. Herman…” The San Diego Weekly Union x “Casa De Las Flores Hotel” San Diego Union Sunday, November 19, 1905 (5:3). xi “On the Auction Block” San Diego Union, Wednesday, September 16, 1914 (7: 6-8). xii “Chula Vista Notes” San Diego Union, Sunday, September 20, 1914 (11: 3). xiii “Highland Hotel is Destroyed” Evening Tribune, Saturday, January 15, 1916. xiv “Fire Destroys Highland Hotel at Chula Vista” San Diego Union, Saturday, January 15, 1916. xv “Two Big Sales are Reported” Evening Tribune, Saturday, March 4, 1916. xvi Visual observation of the 48 F Street property reveals that the home has been modified from its 1911 appearance via a Ranch style facade appended to the front of the home. Although not intensively researched as part of this reporting effort, the 48 F Street property was built during the period that the hotel property was active and operating, and may be one of the cottages or summer homes built on the property. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 234 Historical Resource Analysis Report Casa de la Flores Property Carriage House / Garage Building 50 F Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 June 2016 | Appendix A Photo 1: View southwest of the front elevation. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 235 Historical Resource Analysis Report Casa de la Flores Property Carriage House / Garage Building 50 F Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 June 2016 | Appendix A Photo 2:View southwest of the east wing with shed roof addition and brick chimney. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 236 Historical Resource Analysis Report Casa de la Flores Property Carriage House / Garage Building 50 F Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 June 2016 | Appendix A Photo 3: View southwest. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 237 Historical Resource Analysis Report Casa de la Flores Property Carriage House / Garage Building 50 F Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 June 2016 | Appendix A Photo 4: View west of the east wing, east facade. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 238 Historical Resource Analysis Report Casa de la Flores Property Carriage House / Garage Building 50 F Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 June 2016 | Appendix A Photo 5: View west of the east wing, east facade. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 239 Historical Resource Analysis Report Casa de la Flores Property Carriage House / Garage Building 50 F Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 June 2016 | Appendix A Photo 6: View northwesterly of the east wing, southeast corner, with the shed roof addition in the foreground. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 240 Historical Resource Analysis Report Casa de la Flores Property Carriage House / Garage Building 50 F Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 June 2016 | Appendix A Photo 7: View westerly of the south (at left) and east (at center) elevation and the east wing. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 241 Historical Resource Analysis Report Casa de la Flores Property Carriage House / Garage Building 50 F Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 June 2016 | Appendix A Photo 8: View north of the south elevation. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 242 Historical Resource Analysis Report Casa de la Flores Property Carriage House / Garage Building 50 F Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 June 2016 | Appendix A Photo 9: View north of the south elevation. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 243 Historical Resource Analysis Report Casa de la Flores Property Carriage House / Garage Building 50 F Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 June 2016 | Appendix A Photo 10: View of west facade at the upper level central block where it connects to the west wing. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 244 Historical Resource Analysis Report Casa de la Flores Property Carriage House / Garage Building 50 F Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 June 2016 | Appendix A Photo 11: View northeast of the south elevation. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 245 Historical Resource Analysis Report Casa de la Flores Property Carriage House / Garage Building 50 F Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 June 2016 | Appendix A Photo 12: View northeast of the south elevation (at right) and the rear façade of the west wing (at right). 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 246 Historical Resource Analysis Report Casa de la Flores Property Carriage House / Garage Building 50 F Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 June 2016 | Appendix A Photo 13: Opening / window detail at the south elevation. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 247 Historical Resource Analysis Report Casa de la Flores Property Carriage House / Garage Building 50 F Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 June 2016 | Appendix A Photo 14: South elevation central block. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 248 Historical Resource Analysis Report Casa de la Flores Property Carriage House / Garage Building 50 F Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 June 2016 | Appendix A Photo 15: View of the southwest corner at the west wing. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 249 Historical Resource Analysis Report Casa de la Flores Property Carriage House / Garage Building 50 F Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 June 2016 | Appendix A Photo 16: View south of the north elevation with the west wing in the foreground. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 250 Historical Resource Analysis Report Casa de la Flores Property Carriage House / Garage Building 50 F Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 June 2016 | Appendix A Photo 17: View south of the west wing. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 251 Historical Resource Analysis Report Casa de la Flores Property Carriage House / Garage Building 50 F Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 June 2016 | Appendix A Photo 18: West wing garage doors. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 252 Historical Resource Analysis Report Casa de la Flores Property Carriage House / Garage Building 50 F Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 June 2016 | Appendix A Photo 19: Detail of a typical hinge at the garage door. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 253 Historical Resource Analysis Report Casa de la Flores Property Carriage House / Garage Building 50 F Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 June 2016 | Appendix A Photo 20: Concrete drive in front of the west wing garage. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 254 Historical Resource Analysis Report Casa de la Flores Property Carriage House / Garage Building 50 F Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 June 2016 | Appendix A Photo 21: View southeast of the north elevation. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 255 Historical Resource Analysis Report Casa de la Flores Property Carriage House / Garage Building 50 F Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 June 2016 | Appendix A Photo 22: View south of the north elevation, central block. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 256 Historical Resource Analysis Report Casa de la Flores Property Carriage House / Garage Building 50 F Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 June 2016 | Appendix A Photo 23: View southwest of the north elevation where the central block and the west wing connect with the framed porch appended to the facade. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 257 Historical Resource Analysis Report Casa de la Flores Property Carriage House / Garage Building 50 F Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 June 2016 | Appendix A Photo 24: Foundation detail. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 258 Historical Resource Analysis Report Casa de la Flores Property Carriage House / Garage Building 50 F Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 June 2016 | Appendix A Photo 25: Foundation detail. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 259 Historical Resource Analysis Report Casa de la Flores Property Carriage House / Garage Building 50 F Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 June 2016 | Appendix A Photo 26: Foundation detail. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 260 Historical Resource Analysis Report Casa de la Flores Property Carriage House / Garage Building 50 F Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 June 2016 | Appendix A Photo 27: Foundation detail. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 261 Historical Resource Analysis Report Casa de la Flores Property Carriage House / Garage Building 50 F Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 June 2016 | Appendix A Photo 28: Foundation detail. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 262 Historical Resource Analysis Report Casa de la Flores Property Carriage House / Garage Building 50 F Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 June 2016 | Appendix A Photo 29: Foundation detail: 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 263 Historical Resource Analysis Report Casa de la Flores Property Carriage House / Garage Building 50 F Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 June 2016 | Appendix A Photo 30: Foundation detail. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 264 Historical Resource Analysis Report Casa de la Flores Property Carriage House / Garage Building 50 F Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 June 2016 | Appendix A Photo 31: Foundation detail. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 265 Historical Resource Analysis Report Casa de la Flores Property Carriage House / Garage Building 50 F Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 June 2016 | Appendix A Photo 32: Foundation detail. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 266 Historical Resource Analysis Report Casa de la Flores Property Carriage House / Garage Building 50 F Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 June 2016 | Appendix A Photo 33: Foundation detail. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 267 HISTORIC PRESERVATION PROGRAM Request for Delisting I. Applicant Information 1. Applicant Name: ________________________ 2. Owner of Record: Yes ________ No________ 3. Owner(s) Name & Signature ___________________________ ___________________________ 4. 5. Applicant Mailing Address (if different from than the resource) 3791 Vista Pointe, Bonita, CA 91902 6.Phone Number(s) (619) 991-0031 7.e-mail (Optional) ___________________________________________ II. Resource Information 1. Physical Address ___________________________________________ Date of alteration __________________ Permits Received ___________________ Victor Marmalejo X 50 F Street 569-171-18-002.Assesor's Parcel Number: ___________________________________ 3.Historic Site#: 17 (Herman Hotel Carriage House) 4.Historic Name: Casa de las Flores Hotel Property Carriage House / Garage Building 5.Present Use: Vacant - former single family dwelling now utilized for miscellaneous storage 6.Original Use: Accessory Structure - carriage house / garage for hotel Commercial ______________ Residential _____________ InduX_strial ___________ 7.List any and all alterations to the resource: (including materials alterations) Date: June 16, 2016 SeeEFTDSJQUJPOPGBMUFSBUJPOTJOSFTQPOTFUP/P 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 268 HISTORIC PRESERVATION PROGRAM 15. Condition of the resource: 16. Please list how the historical significance of the designated resource has been diminished and provide supporting evidence that supports this information.. An Expert Technical Analysis is also required. For more information on Expert Technical Analysis see HPP Section 4.3. Good __________ Fair__________ Irreparably Deteriorated X (poor condition) The 50 F Street property includes a single remaining building from the 10-acre Casa de las Flores hotel property. This building served as a carriage house / garage during the hotel property’s 1894-1914 period of significance. Previous survey efforts did not disclose the extent of development at the 10-acre complex, nor was the total number of buildings, structures, and landscape features identified as part of the survey and subsequent designation effort. In light of new evidence identified during the course of historical research for this HRAR, wherein the development history of the Casa de las Flores property was more fully understood to include extensive improvements beyond the main hotel building and a carriage house / garage and wherein said research provided for the establishment of a period of significance for the property, the carriage house / garage building is not eligible for listing on the CRHR or for the Local Register. At its height the property featured the main hotel building, two five-room cottages, one four-room cottage, one one-room cottage, two summerhouses, the subject carriage house / garage building, and landscape features including a circular drive with two access roads, planted fruit and olive trees, flowerbeds, corrals and poultry runs, and reportedly, a golf course, the 50 F Street property comprised of the single remaining modified carriage house / garage building. The remaining modified carriage house / garage building represents 1/13th of the documented hotel complex, and the hotel property itself covered 10-acres of land, whereas today the 50 F Street property includes less than one acre and the surrounding environs have been drastically changed through residential development. After the hotel property was destroyed by fire, the carriage house was converted for use as a private dwelling and was subsequently modified over time. The building no longer exhibits its historic appearance from the 1894-1914 period of significance as observed in an 1897 photograph. The building does not adequately convey the history or potential significance of the hotel complex, as it existed in the 1894-1914 period. The building has not been found individually eligible relative to its existing architectural characteristics. For these reasons, the 50 F Street property is eligible for delisting consideration under the City of Chula Vista Municipal Code §21.05.040 and no longer qualifies as a historical resource pursuant to Public Resources Code §5024.1 and §15064.5 of the associated CEQA Guidelines. The 50 F Street property is suitable for delisting from the City of Chula Vista Historical Resources Register based on the following findings of fact. 1. The building was designated for its association with the Herman Hotel, as the last existing building associated with the property. The long-destroyed hotel property and its associated contributing elements were built and in use as a hotel from 1894 through 1914. The carriage house building does not retain adequate integrity to the 1894-1914 period of significance identified for the hotel property and its contributing features, nor did it retain integrity when it was designated. 2. The building’s significance would be derived from its role as a contributing element to the historic hotel complex in place from circa 1894-1914, not as an individual property. The hotel complex is no longer intact. A single modified building that provided a secondary use cannot adequately represent this historic hotel property. 3. As the sole remaining feature within the boundaries of the 10-acre historic hotel complex, the building at 50 F Street does not convey the historical events, development patterns, architectural qualities, or spatial and landscape characteristics once associated with the historic hotel property. 4. At the time of designation, the building at 50 F Street did not adequately convey or represent the 1894-1914 period of significance identified for the hotel property, and as such, the designation should not have occurred. 5. The building has not been found eligible, either individually or as part of a landscape or historic district, under California Register Criterion 1 or Local Register Criterion 1 relating to important events or patterns of events. 6. The building has not been found eligible, either individually or as part of a landscape or historic district, under California Register Criterion 2 or Local Register Criterion 2 relating to important persons. 7. The building has not been found eligible, either individually or as part of a landscape or historic district, under California Register Criterion 3 or Local Register Criterion 3 relating to a type, period, region, or method of construction. 8. The building has not been found eligible, either individually or as part of a landscape or historic district, under Local Register Criterion 4 relating to a publicly owned historic cultural landscape or a privately owned cultural landscape. 9. The building has not been found eligible, either individually or as part of a landscape or historic district, under California Register Criterion 4 or Local Register Criterion 5 relating to further study and the ability to yield additional information in the future. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 269 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 270 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 271 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 272 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 273 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 274 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 275 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 276 RESOLUTION NO. XXXX RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS (COA) PERMIT COA16-0007 REQUESTING TO DELIST THE HERMAN HOTEL CARRIAGE HOUSE SITE #17 HISTORICAL RESOURCE FROM THE CHULA VISTA REGISTER OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES WHEREAS, in 1985, the Herman Hotel Carriage House, located at 50 “F” Street, was first documented in the City of Chula Vista Historic Resources Inventory (Exhibit A); and WHEREAS, in 1987 the Herman Hotel Carriage House was designated as a historical resource, and listed as Historic Site #17 on the Chula Vista Register of Historical Resources; and WHEREAS, in 2011 the City Council adopted the Historical Preservation Ordinance that provides a process for delisting an historical resource; and WHEREAS, on July 25, 2016 a duly verified application for a Major Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) requesting to delist the Herman Hotel Carriage House from the Chula Vista Register of Historical Resources, was filed with the City of Chula Vista Development Services Department by Victor Marmolejo, Applicant; and WHEREAS, on July 19, 2017 the City of Chula Vista Historic Preservation Commission recommended approval to delist the Herman Hotel Carriage House as an historical resource from the Chula Vista Register of Historical Resources; and WHEREAS, Development Services staff has reviewed the delisting Project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the Carriage House, although originally designated as a local historical resource, no longer meets the eligibility criteria for a historical resource. New evidence demonstrates that the Carriage House’s integrity has diminished, that it was designated inaccurately as substantial structural alterations had changed its appearance, and it no longer physically conveys a historical significance. Furthermore, the Chula Vista Building Official and Fire Marshall have determined that the building is unsafe and a potential threat to public safety. Therefore, the Project is not subject to CEQA Section 21084.1, and is therefore exempt from review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15301(l)(1) Existing Facilities (Demolition of Small Structures); no further CEQA review is required; and WHEREAS, a hearing time and place was set for the City Council for consideration of the COA requesting to delist the Carriage House, and a notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 277 Page 2 September 12, 2017 general circulation in the City, and its mailing to current property owners and residents within 500 feet of the property at least 10 days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on said COA request to delist the Carriage House at a time and place as advertised, namely September 12, 2017 at 5:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, and said hearing was thereafter closed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council hereby makes the following findings: 1. New evidence demonstrates that previously identified historical significance of the historical resource has been reduced or no longer exists such that the resource no longer meets the eligibility criteria. In 2016, as part of this delisting request, Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC, a qualified historic professional firm, prepared a Historical Resource Analysis Report (HRAR) that introduced evidence indicating that the Carriage House no longer meets the eligibility criteria. The study concludes that the Carriage House should never have been listed due to its loss of historical resource integrity by loss of association with the Herman Hotel, and substantial structural alterations that had significantly altered its appearance, such that it no longer physically conveys an identifiable historical resource. 2. The resource was designated inaccurately based on incorrect information. The property was originally identified as a historical resource in a 1985 City historical inventory survey, despite the fact that there was physical evidence that the Carriage House had substantial alterations. The HRAR report concludes that the Carriage House should not have been designated as an historical resource, and made the findings for delisting the property as a historical resource. 3. The integrity of the historical resource or the resource itself has been greatly diminished such that it no longer physically conveys its identified historical significance resultant from extensive unintentional damage, fire, flood, or natural disaster. Staff’s property site visit revealed that an apparent unsafe condition and potential hazard exists. The Historic Preservation Ordinance describes the delisting process when the integrity of a structure is in question. The Carriage House appears to have exterior and interior deteriorating conditions. These conditions were cause for Building and Fire staff to conduct a field inspection to ascertain the building’s physical condition relative to public safety. Following the inspection, staff determined that the building is an unsafe hazard. The Building Official prepared a letter explaining the findings for this determination pursuant to Chula Vista Municipal Code (CVMC) 21.09.030. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 278 Page 3 September 12, 2017 NOW THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council hereby approves the request to delist the Carriage House as an historical resource from the Chula Vista Register of Historical Resources based upon the findings contained herein. Presented By:Approved as to form by: ____________________________________________________ Gary Halbert Glen R. Googins City Manager City Attorney PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, this 12 th, day of September, 2017, by the following vote, to-wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ____________________________ Mary Casillas Salas, Mayor ATTEST: ______________________ Kerry Bigalow City Clerk 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 279 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 280 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 281 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 282 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 283 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 284 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 285 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 286 City of Chula Vista Staff Report File#:17-0154, Item#: 11. CONSIDERATION OF SUPPORTING SENATE BILL 54, THE CALIFORNIA VALUES ACT (This item was continued from 8/15/2017.) RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA SUPPORTING SENATE BILL 54, THE CALIFORNIA VALUES ACT RECOMMENDED ACTION Council consider the resolution and take action as Council deems appropriate. SUMMARY The City Council discussed the City’s immigration enforcement policies in a hearing on April 4, 2017. Members of the public advocated for Senate Bill 54, the California Values Act. The Council, by a 3-2 vote, directed staff to present a resolution supporting the bill. This item implements that direction. The Council affirmed the City’s immigration enforcement policies and directed staff to join the “Welcoming America” network in Resolution 2017-063 on April 25, 2017. The California Senate passed SB 54, 27-12, on April 3, 2017. The bill is pending review in the California Assembly, which is in recess until August 21, 2017. This staff report summarizes the bill, as amended on July 10, 2017. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Environmental Notice The activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required. Environmental Determination The activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required. BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Not applicable DISCUSSION A.Background City of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 1 of 9 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 287 File#:17-0154, Item#: 11. SB 54, titled the “California Values Act, was introduced in December 2016 by Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de León, D-Los Angeles. The bill was amended four times in response to law enforcement concerns before it passed in the Senate on April 3, 2017, 27-12. The bill is now pending review in the California Assembly. A vote by the full Assembly is expected in by the end of the current legislative session. According to media reports this month, Governor Jerry Brown is discussing amendments to the bill with Senator de León’s office. Governor Brown reportedly also is meeting with law enforcement leaders about their recommendations, such as allowing federal officials to continue working in jails and expanding the bill’s scope to expand exceptions to include additional felony crimes.. If the bill passes in the Assembly and is subsequently signed into law by Governor Brown, the bill would add sections 7284 to 7284.10 to the California Government Code and sections 3058.10 and 3058.11 to the California Penal Code and would become effective on January 1, 2018. The bill would repeal California Health and Safety Code Section 11369, which requires a local law enforcement agency to notify federal immigration authorities if there is reason to believe a non-U.S. citizen has been arrested for certain drug crimes. The bill would prohibit California law enforcement agencies from using “agency or department moneys, facilities, property, equipment, or personnel to investigate, interrogate, detain, detect or arrest persons for immigration enforcement purposes.” The bill defines “immigration enforcement” as “any and all efforts to investigate, enforce, or assist in the investigation or enforcement of any federal civil immigration law, and also includes any and all efforts to investigate, enforce or assist in the investigation or enforcement of any federal criminal immigration law that penalizes a person’s presence in, entry, or re-entry to, or employment in, the United States,” with listed exceptions. 1.Law enforcement activities prohibited by SB 54 would include: ·inquiring into an individual’s immigration status ·detaining an individual on the basis of a hold request ·responding to requests for notification by providing release dates or other information, unless that information is available to the public (time of release from custody is public information, pursuant to Cal. Government Code section 6254 (f)(1)) ·providing information regarding a person’s release date unless that information is available to the public (time of release from custody is public information, pursuant to Cal. Government Code section 6254 (f)(1)) ·providing personal information about an individual, such as home or work address, unless that information is available to the public (the home address of an arrested individual is public information if the requestor declares under penalty of perjury that the request is made for a government purpose, pursuant to Cal. Government Code section 6254(f)(3)) City of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 2 of 9 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 288 File#:17-0154, Item#: 11. ·making, assisting, or participating in arrests based on civil immigration warrants ·giving federal immigration authorities access to interview an individual in state or local custody for immigration purposes unless pursuant to a judicial warrant and in accordance with the consent form requirements of Cal. Government Code section 7283.1 ·assisting federal immigration authorities in the activities described in Title 8 U.S.C. 1357 (a)(3): searching vessels or vehicles within 25 miles of a border to prevent illegal entry into the United States ·performing the functions of an immigration officer, whether formally or informally ·making an agency’s own database, regarding a person’s citizenship or immigration status, available to anyone or any entity for immigration enforcement; a person or entity allowed access to an agency’s own database must certify in writing that the database will be kept confidential and will not be used for immigration enforcement purposes; any agreements in effect on January 1, 2018 that conflict with this paragraph are terminated on that date ·placing peace officers under the supervision of federal agencies, or employing peace officers deputized as special federal officers, except to the extent those peace officers remain subject to California law governing peace officer conduct and the policies of the employing agency ·using federal immigration officers as interpreters for law enforcement matters relating to individuals in agency or department custody ·transferring an individual to federal immigration authorities for immigration enforcement, or detaining an individual for immigration enforcement, unless authorized by a judicial warrant or judicial probable cause, or for a violation of Title 8.U.S.C. 1326(a) that is subject to enhancement specified by Section 1326(b) (criminal immigration laws prohibiting reentry into the United after removal for an aggravated felony conviction) and the individual has previously been convicted of a violent felony listed in Cal. Penal Code section 667.5(c), 2.Law enforcement activities allowed under SB 54 would include: ·responding to a request from federal immigration authorities for information about a specific person’s criminal history, such as arrests and convictions, where otherwise permitted by state law, ·participating in joint law enforcement task forces as long as the primary purpose is not immigration enforcement ·asking for information necessary to certify an individual as a potential crime or City of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 3 of 9 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 289 File#:17-0154, Item#: 11. ·asking for information necessary to certify an individual as a potential crime or trafficking victim to qualify for a T Visa or U Visa ·responding to a notification request from federal immigration authorities for a person who is serving a term for the conviction of a misdemeanor or felony offense and has a current or prior conviction for a violent felony listed in Cal. Penal Code section 667.5 (c) or a serious felony listed in Cal. Penal Code 1192.7(c), which are listed in sections A.4 and A.5, respectively, below ·sending to, or receiving from, federal immigration authorities, information regarding the citizenship or immigration status, lawful or unlawful, of an individual pursuant to Sections 1372 and 1644 of Title 8 of the United States Code 3.Mandates for prisons, schools, health facilities: In addition to the above-listed prohibited and permitted activities, SB 54 would impose the following mandates: ·require the Board of Parole Hearings and the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to provide at least 60 days’ notice to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), such as name and release date, for prison inmates serving a current term for, or having a prior conviction for, a violent felony or a serious felony as listed in Cal. Penal Code sections 667.5 (c) and 1192.7 (c), respectively ·require the Attorney General to consult with stakeholders and publish by April 1, 2018 model policies limiting assistance with immigration enforcement to the fullest extent possible consistent with federal and state law at public schools, libraries, health facilities operated by a state or county, courthouses, Division of Labor Standards Enforcement facilities, and shelters to ensure they remain safe and accessible to all California residents regardless of immigration status ·require all public schools, health facilities operated by the state or a county, and courthouses to implement the model policy or an equivalent. All other organizations and entities that provide services related to physical health or mental health and wellness, education, or access to justice, including the University of California, would be encouraged to adopt the model policy ·require participants in joint task forces to submit a report every six months to the California Department of Justice, as specified by the Attorney General, to include the agencies involved in the task force, the arrests made, and the description and number of people arrested for immigration enforcement purposes ·require the Attorney General to issue biannual reports with specified information by March 1, 2019 4.Violent felonies City of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 4 of 9 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 290 File#:17-0154, Item#: 11. Penal Code section 667.5 (c) defines “violent felony” as: ·murder or voluntary manslaughter ·mayhem (maliciously disabling or disfiguring another) ·rape ·sodomy ·oral copulation ·lewd or lascivious act on a child ·any felony punishable by death or life imprisonment ·any felony in which great bodily harm or use of a firearm is proved ·robbery ·arson ·sexual penetration (by force, on child under 14) ·attempted murder ·bombing ·kidnapping ·assault with intent to commit a felony ·continuous sexual abuse of a child ·carjacking ·rape, sexual penetration with foreign object ·extortion ·threats to victims and witnesses with criminal street gang violation ·burglary of inhabited dwelling when resident is home ·felonies in which a firearm is used ·using weapons of mass destruction 5.Serious felonies Penal Code section 1192.7(c) lists as “serious felonies” most of the same crimes listed as “violent felonies,” with the following additions: ·Assault with a deadly weapon or instrument on peace officer ·Assault by a life prisoner on a non-inmate ·Holding a hostage by a state prisoner ·Attempt to commit a felony punishable by death or life imprisonment ·Providing dangerous drugs to a minor ·Any felony offense that constitutes a criminal street gang violation ·Throwing acid or flammable substances ·Assault with a deadly weapon ·Assault with a deadly weapon against school, transit, prison employees ·Discharge of a firearm at an occupied vehicle, aircraft or dwelling ·Rape or sexual penetration in concert with another person City of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 5 of 9 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 291 File#:17-0154, Item#: 11. ·Shooting from a vehicle ·Criminal threats ·Any attempt to commit or a conspiracy to commit a listed serious felony B.SB 54’s impacts on the Chula Vista Police Department This bill is anticipated to have no impact on current operation of the City’s jail, or on routine patrol and investigation functions. A summary of jail operations, excerpted from the April 4 staff report on City policies for immigration enforcement, is included below. Because the Department participates in joint task forces that focus on crime, not immigration, the Department would be required to submit bi- annual reports concerning task force operations to demonstrate compliance with SB 54 to the California Department of Justice, in a format that would be determined by the State Attorney General. 1.City jail CVPD uses its jail to “book” and briefly detain individuals arrested by CVPD officers. “Booking” involves documenting identifying information, photographing and fingerprinting an arrested party. Fingerprints and photos of all arrestees are shared automatically with other local, state, and federal agencies through a shared data base. CVPD averages six adult bookings into the City jail per day. After booking, male arrestees are taken to the San Diego County Central Jail in downtown San Diego. Female arrestees are taken to Las Colinas Detention and Reentry Facility in Santee. CVPD jail staff does not itself inquire regarding an arrestee’s immigration status, but may become aware of detainers, warrants, or other notifications by ICE that have been entered by ICE into law enforcement databases. Per the City’s jails procedures manual, if this occurs, ICE would be notified. If ICE provides an ICE Detention order, that order is transported with the arrestee to the County Jail. Jail staff: ·Does not specifically inquire about the immigration status of any arrestee. ·Does not proactively contact ICE to detain arrestees or for identification purposes. ·Does not release local arrestees to ICE or Customs and Border Protection, via detainer or any other method. They do, however, release U.S. Marshals’ inmates to ICE when so directed by the Marshals Office via ICE Detainer. ·Does not give consideration to immigration status when determining arrestees to be transported to San Diego County Jail. Arrestees are transferred to County Jail according to CVPD policy and the Jail’s acceptance criteria, regardless of immigration status. Since 2009 the primary use of the City jail has been through a City contract with the U.S. Marshals Service to house individuals charged with federal felony crimes. Under this contract, the jail currently houses only female inmates, averaging 30 daily in 2016. These individuals have been arrested by federal law enforcement officers and are either in criminal pre-trial or trial proceedings in federal court, or they have been convicted and sentenced in federal court and are awaiting assignment to a federal prison. The jail is not used as a detention center for individuals suspected of alleged civil City of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 6 of 9 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 292 File#:17-0154, Item#: 11. immigration offenses. C.SB 54’s impacts on county jails and state prisons As noted in the April 4, 2017 staff report on city policies on immigration enforcement, this bill primarily affects county law enforcement agencies that operate jails and state agencies that operate prisons. These entities routinely handle detainer and notification requests from Federal immigration officials concerning access to and transfer of immigrant inmates. Specifically, jailers would be prohibited from honoring detainer requests or allowing Federal immigration officers access to inmates for immigration purposes, unless authorized by a judicial warrant or a judicial determination of probable cause. Jailers would be prohibited from transferring an inmate to Federal immigration authorities unless authorized by a judicial warrant or a determination of judicial probable cause, or unless the undocumented inmate was subject to a violation of specific Federal criminal immigration laws and had specific violent or serious felony convictions. Jailers also would be prohibited from responding to a notification request from a Federal immigration official unless the inmate was serving a term for a misdemeanor or felony conviction and had a prior conviction for a violent or serious felony defined by state law. 1.County jail A summary of County of San Diego jail operations from the April 4, 2017 staff report is excerpted below: Arrestees from every jurisdiction in San Diego County, including Chula Vista, are taken to one of the San Diego County Sheriff’s Department’s intake jails in downtown San Diego, Santee or Vista. The City has no legal control or authority over policies within the County jail system. Immigrant arrestees are subject to evaluation by ICE agents who work at these jails for possible immigration consequences following release from Sheriff’s custody. Specifically, ICE agents review criminal history, which is tied to fingerprints and identifying information routinely obtained in the booking process. If subject to immigration consequences, including removal proceedings, these inmates are subject to transfer directly from Sheriff’s custody to ICE custody before leaving a County jail. ICE custody could result in transfer to an immigration detention facility or immediate removal from the United States. Sheriff William D. Gore, in a media interview, has stated he believes it is safer for all concerned for ICE agents to take custody of eligible inmates in a secure jail setting rather than have agents seek out individuals after release from jail in public or at private work places and residences, where agents also may encounter additional undocumented individuals. D.Arguments for SB 54 An 18-page analysis of the bill, prepared by Alison Merrilees for the July 5, 2017 Assembly Committee on the Judiciary, is attached. According to the analysis, 126 groups have registered support for SB 54, from Abriendo Puertas (Opening Doors) to the YWCA, along with “numerous individuals.” The only city listed was Redwood City. The “Arguments In Support” section of the analysis states on Page 15: “The Mario G. Obledo National Coalition of Hispanic Organizations writes in support of the bill that ‘using local police resources to support immigration law enforcement detracts from their primary goalCity of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 7 of 9 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 293 File#:17-0154, Item#: 11. ‘using local police resources to support immigration law enforcement detracts from their primary goal of preserving the public order and ensuring that violent felons are apprehended and incarcerated in a timely manner.’ SB 54, it continues, ‘properly ensure that state and local law enforcement agencies, including school police agencies, will not engage in immigration enforcement. Further, SB 54 requires that California courts health facilities and schools safe and accessible regardless of immigration status. It is a compassionate bill designed to afford human rights to all of California’s inhabitants.’ Similarly, Asian Americans Advancing Justice, write that “SB 54 would disentangle local law enforcement from the business of deportations’ and as a result will ‘create safer spaces as schools, libraries, courthouses, shelters, DLSE facilities, and health care facilities, by limiting immigration enforcement at these locations.’ The ACLU of Northern California observes that ‘SB 54 upholds California’s core values of equal treatment, community, family unity, and common humanity by ensuring that California’s police departments, schools, healthcare facilities and courts remain accessible to Californians from all walks of life.’” E.Arguments Against SB 54 According to the analysis, 4 groups and “numerous individuals” have registered opposition to SB 54. Included are the California Police Chiefs Association, of which Chief Roxana Kennedy is a member, and the California State Sheriffs Association, along with the cities of Camarillo, Glendora, Torrance, and West Covina. The “Arguments In Opposition” section of the analysis states on Page 15: “Peace Officers Research Association of California writes that it opposes SB 54 for ‘three critical reasons’ which it identified as the requirement to report task force operations to the Attorney General; the unintended impact of detained immigrants likely being taken outside the state ‘thereby separating them from their families, communities and networks’ and ‘the breakdown of local, state, and federal partnerships [that] will prevent our officers from being able to do their jobs; consequently, violent criminals will remain on the streets and our families will be in danger.’ The California State Sheriffs Association writes that although ‘Sheriffs do not wish to act as immigration police…we need to continue to cooperate with our law enforcement partners to ensure that those who victimize our communities are not given unnecessary opportunities to do more harm.’ The association continues that ‘The bill, with limited exception, precludes law enforcement from sharing information that is not publicly available about persons in custody with federal authorities’ so that ‘sheriffs would still be precluded from relaying information about people convicted of crimes like domestic violence and drunk driving unless they also had current or prior convictions for serious or violent felonies.’ The California Police Chiefs Association also opposes the bill, for the same general reasons as expressed by other law enforcement groups, and concludes about the bill that ‘SB 54 will make it more difficult to work with our federal law enforcement partners in apprehending dangerous criminals, and threatens to create more fear in our communities by forcing federal immigrations operations out of our jails and into our communities.’” Another objection to SB 54 is that it violates principles of “home rule”. Proponents of SB 54 have noted that it is inappriopriate for federal law enforcement authorities to impose its rules on state and local law enforcement. The solution of SB 54 is to impose state level restrictions on local law enforcement. City of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 8 of 9 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 294 File#:17-0154, Item#: 11. Staff Recommendation: Consider the resolution and take action as Council deems appropriate. DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT Staff has reviewed the decision contemplated by this action and has determined that it is not site- specific and consequently, the 500-foot rule found in California Code of Regulations Title 2, section 18702.2(a)(11), is not applicable to this decision for purposes of determining a disqualifying real property-related financial conflict of interest under the Political Reform Act (Cal. Gov't Code § 87100, et seq.). Staff is not independently aware, and has not been informed by any City Council member, of any other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter. LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS The City’s Strategic Plan has five major goals: Operational Excellence, Economic Vitality, Healthy Community, Strong and Secure Neighborhoods and a Connected Community. This report discusses issues and policies linked to the City’s Economic Vitality and Strong and Secure Neighborhoods. CURRENT YEAR FISCAL IMPACT This resolution by itself creates no current year fiscal impacts. ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT This resolution by itself creates no ongoing fiscal impacts. If SB 54 is adopted, the Chula Vista Police Department would have additional reporting requirements. The amount of additional staff time required is difficult to estimate at this time until Attorney General reporting guidelines are finalized. ATTACHMENTS Attachment A - current version of Senate Bill No. 54, as of July 10, 2017, the most recent amendment Attachment B - Analysis of SB 54, Assembly Committee on Judiciary, Date of Hearing July 5, the most recent legislative analysis available Staff Contact: Gary Halbert, City Manager, Roxana Kennedy, Chief of Police and/or Glen Googins, City Attorney City of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 9 of 9 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 295 RESOLUTION NO. __________ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA SUPPORTING SENATE BILL 54, THE CALIFORNIA VALUES ACT WHEREAS, Senate Bill (SB) 54, known as the California Values Act, was passed in the California Senate on April 3, 2017, and is pending review in the California Assembly; and WHEREAS, the City’s immigration enforcement policies were discussed in hearings at the City Council on April 4, 2017 and April 25, 2017, with members of the public advocating for the bill; and WHEREAS, at the April 4, 2017 Council meeting, by a vote of 3-2, the City Council directed staff to bring back a resolution supporting the bill, and this Resolution implements that direction; and WHEREAS, SB 54 would prohibit state and local law enforcement agencies from using agency moneys, facilities, property, equipment or personnel to investigate, interrogate, detain, detect, or arrest persons for immigration enforcement purposes, including enforcement of any civil immigration law and enforcement of any criminal immigration law that penalizes a person’s presence in, entry, or reentry to, or employment in the United States, with specified exceptions; and WHEREAS, SB 54 would prohibit state and local law enforcement agencies from entering into agreements authorized by federal law to delegate immigration powers to local agencies and to designate local law enforcement officers as immigration officers pursuant to federal law; and WHEREAS, SB 54 would prohibit making agency or department databases, or the information therein, other than information within those databases regarding an individual’s citizenship or immigration status, available to anyone or any entity for the purpose of immigration enforcement; and WHEREAS, SB 54 would prohibit placing peace officers under the supervision of federal agencies or employ peace officers deputized as special federal officers or special federal deputies except to the extent those peace officers remain subject to California law governing conduct of peace officers and the policies of the employing agency; and WHEREAS, SB 54 would prohibit using federal immigration authorities as interpreters for law enforcement matters related to individuals in agency or department custody; and WHEREAS, SB 54 would prohibit transferring an individual to federal immigration authorities unless authorized by a judicial warrant or judicial probable cause determination; and 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 296 WHEREAS, SB 54 would not prohibit law enforcement agencies from: (1) responding to a request from federal immigration authorities for information about a specific person’s criminal history; (2) participating in a joint task force, so long as the primary purpose of the task force is not immigration enforcement; (3) making inquiries as necessary to certify an individual as a potential crime or trafficking victim for a “T” or “U” Visa pursuant to federal law; and (4) responding to a notification request from federal immigration authorities for a person who is serving a term for the conviction of a misdemeanor or felony offense and has a current or prior conviction for a violent felony or a serious felony, as defined in the California Penal Code; and WHEREAS, SB 54 would not prohibit or restrict any government entity or official from sending to or receiving from, federal immigration authorities, information regarding the citizenship or immigration status, lawful or unlawful, of an individual, pursuant to Sections 1373 and 1644 of Title 8 of the Unites States Code; and WHEREAS, SB 54 would require agencies that participate in a joint task force to report specified information every six months to the California Attorney General; and WHEREAS, SB 54 would not affect routine patrol, investigative or jail operations of the Chula Vista Police Department; and WHEREAS, SB 54 is consistent with the City of Chula Vista’s immigration enforcement policies affirmed on April 25, 2017 in Resolution 2017-063, in that Chula Vista Police Department officers do not ask the individuals they encounter about immigration status or enforce federal immigration law; and WHEREAS SB 54 is consistent with the City Jail’s operations, in that staff does not release individuals arrested by Department officers to Federal immigration authorities pursuant to detainers; the jail is contracted to the U.S. Marshal’s Service to house inmates charged with Federal crimes; and the jail is not used as an immigration detention center. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, that it supports Senate Bill 54, the California Values Act. Presented by Approved as to form by Gary Halbert Glen R. Googins City Manager City Attorney 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 297 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 298 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 299 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 300 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 301 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 302 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 303 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 304 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 305 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 306 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 307 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 308 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 309 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 310 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 311 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 312 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 313 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 314 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 315 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 316 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 317 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 318 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 319 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 320 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 321 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 322 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 323 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 324 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 325 City of Chula Vista Staff Report File#:17-0360, Item#: 12. CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTING THE CHULA VISTA SMART CITY STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ADOPTING THE CHULA VISTA SMART CITY STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN RECOMMENDED ACTION Council adopt the resolution. SUMMARY The City of Chula Vista has established itself as a leader in the growing “smart city” movement, earning recognition locally, nationally and internationally for its innovative approach to using technology to create a more efficient and effective government. In an effort to clarify the city’s smart city vision and formalize a strategy going forward, staff worked with Madaffer Enterprises to develop the City of Chula Vista’s Smart City Strategic Action Plan (Action Plan). The Action Plan serves as a roadmap and outlines the goals, objectives and initiatives that will help the City achieve its smart city vision. As a smart city, Chula Vista leverages innovative technology and data tools to better serve and engage citizens, enhance sustainability, improve public safety and promote local economic development. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Environmental Notice The activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required. Environmental Determination The Director of Development Services has reviewed the proposed activity for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines because it will not result in a physical change in the environment; therefore, pursuant to Section 15060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Thus, no environmental review is required. BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Not Applicable. DISCUSSION The City of Chula Vista has a proud history of civic innovation and leadership. The city is widely recognized for its early contributions to climate change response, dating back to the mid-1990s, and continuing with early action on developing transit-oriented neighborhoods, the historic agreements City of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 1 of 5 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 326 File#:17-0360, Item#: 12. related to the Chula Vista Bayfront, and the purchase and designation of land for a University and Innovation District, among others. Leadership within city staff has also operated for many years around a philosophy of continuous improvement - constantly working to become a better, more nimble, more flexible municipal government. The development of a smart city strategy is just the latest example of innovative thinking for Chula Vista. A smart city uses information and communication technology to enhance livability, workability and sustainability. Chula Vista is one of a growing number of cities and local governments around the world that are turning to smart technologies to enhance efficiency of city operations and boost effectiveness of services, including public safety and emergency response services. These cities are also exploring how innovative technology can generate new revenue and promote economic development. Chula Vista’s smart city vision began to emerge more clearly when the City and the Port of San Diego worked with Black & Veatch to complete a formal assessment of the energy and smart technologies that could be incorporated into development at the Chula Vista Bayfront to help achieve the aggressive energy reduction targets required by the Master Settlement Agreement. The resulting Chula Vista Smart Bayfront reports identified and investigated energy efficiency and distributed energy generation technologies, communication network architectures, and smart infrastructure applications. Designing and implementing these innovative solutions will make Bayfront development a test-bed for smart city technology that can be expanded across the city and throughout the region. Department heads and their teams across the City are already committed to various smart city projects. These include: ·A new enterprise resource planning (ERP) system in the Finance Department ·A new Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD) system in the Police Department ·A new asset management system in the Public Works Department ·Fiber Assessment study ·A Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan in the Engineering Division ·The designation of local streets by the U.S. Department of Transportation as one of 10 Autonomous Vehicle Proving Grounds (AVPG) Combined with the results of the Smart Bayfront reports, the growing number of smart city projects made it clear that the City needed a strategic action plan to define the city’s smart city goals and evaluate how to leverage and prioritize resources to accomplish our goals, objectives and initiatives. In October 2016, the City engaged Madaffer Enterprises to assist staff in developing a Smart Cities Strategic Action Plan (Action Plan) that would serve as a roadmap that outlines priorities and guides the City’s smart city efforts. The Action Plan was developed through a collaborative process across city departments and represents the collective vision of city leadership, department heads, and key stakeholders in the community and region. The process of developing the Action Plan began with a comprehensive “SWOT analysis” to determine the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats facing the City’s smart cities efforts. Working closely with city staff, Madaffer Enterprises then conducted individual interviews with all City of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 2 of 5 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 327 File#:17-0360, Item#: 12. department heads, including Police and Fire. The meetings intended to capture critical input from departments to ensure a collective process in defining the city’s smart cities vision and Action Plan. Madaffer also conducted a public opinion survey with Chula Vista residents to gather input on smart cities priorities to also ensure community input on the development of the Action Plan. After concluding this investigative process, Madaffer worked closely with staff to develop the goals and implementation strategies for Chula Vista’s smart city efforts. The Action Plan consists of four (4) goals that are supported by ten (10) objectives and thirty-nine (39) initiatives/actions. In addition, the Action Plan also includes the following three (3) supporting appendices as part of the project scope. 1. A communications plan designed to assist the Office of Communications in messaging and effective tactics for promoting and marketing smart city initiatives 2. A two-page handout that provides context and summary for the Smart Bayfront assessment report and the role of the Bayfront in the City’s larger smart city strategy 3. A two-page handout that explains economic development benefits of the City’s smart city strategy. One of the fundamental elements of all smart city applications is reliable, secure broadband connectivity. The Action Plan identifies improving the City’s network as a top priority, and work on this goal is already underway. In August, the City released a Request for Proposals for a consultant to help City staff develop a Telecommunications Master Plan, and the procurement process will be complete this fall. Similarly, the Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan has been completed and plays a pivotal role in the Smart City strategy. Successfully implementing the Action Plan will depend heavily on cross-departmental collaboration. To ensure success, the plan’s implementation will be led by the Smart Cities Working Group (SCWG), which has been established to help coordinate efforts citywide and facilitate information sharing. The cross-functional working group meets monthly and includes the City Manager, Assistant City Manager, Deputy City Manager, multiple department directors and Police and Fire. The SCWG efforts will be coordinated by the Chief Sustainability Officer who acts as the City's "Smart Cities Champion." In addition, Chula Vista will continue to work with our regional partners, including the Port of San Diego, SDG&E, SANDAG, Caltrans, City of San Diego and Cleantech San Diego to identify opportunities for successful deployment of smart city technologies across our region. The City will continue to ensure that our smart city initiatives are sustained by long-term stakeholder engagement across our region. Knowledge sharing will also be a critical component of the Action Plan implementation. City staff will continue to participate in various national and international forums to discuss best practices and share critical knowledge. These include Smart Cities Week, Smart Cities Council, Smart Cities Connect, Envision America and What Works Cities. City staff are excited about the significant anticipated benefits from implementation of the Action Plan to city operations, residents and communities. These include maximizing the value of taxpayer dollars through increased efficiency of city operations and optimization of city resources. Highlighted City of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 3 of 5 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 328 File#:17-0360, Item#: 12. below are some of the key areas that are anticipated to benefit the most from the implementation of the Action Plan. ·Public Safety Enhancement: One of the biggest benefits of adopting smart cities technology is in the area of public safety. Our efforts will be instrumental in order to meet the public safety standards for police and fire. Through integration of and use of IoT tools (i.e. data, sensors, GPS, enhanced connectivity) emergency service departments will be better connected to information, can be deployed with greater accuracy and through the use of intelligent traffic signals they will experience improved response times. In addition, technology will improve officer and personnel safety and reduce emergency call response times. In addition, as part of the Action Plan initiatives, we expect to see a reduction in traffic accidents and vehicle emissions. ·Public Works: The use of smart technology in managing the condition of our turf at 60+ parks, the scheduling of our recreation centers and park amenities, the monitoring of our wastewater system, street and traffic lights and enhanced building management systems that integrate data into a centralized dashboard. These technologies allow staff to manage the cities resources without the deployment of personnel to go to the site, providing enhanced services to our residents. ·Economic Development Growth: A pioneer in renewable energy, the San Diego region’s clean technology cluster is second to none. Our region is one of the nation’s top locations for research and development in engineering, life sciences and biotechnology, which are critical to the success of the cleantech cluster. In 2016, the region ranked #3 in the nation for cleantech leadership. Continued growth in markets such as solar, wind, energy efficiency, storage and electric vehicles has elevated our region as a leader in the climate action and smart cities movements. With a commitment to innovation, sustainability and collaboration that includes everyone from technology companies and academia to local government and the military, our region continues to lead in the development and adoption of clean technologies. San Diego County employs 1.9 times as many people in the cleantech/smart cities arena as the national average and ranked #1 nationally in solar installations with more than 93,000 systems in the region. San Diego County is recognized as one of the world’s top 10 smart cities projects. This recognition within the region attracts companies and venture capital to San Diego County allowing us to attract job creation and businesses to Chula Vista. DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT Staff has reviewed the decision contemplated by this action and has determined that it is not site specific and consequently, the 500-foot rule found in California Code of Regulations section 18704.2 (a)(1), is not applicable to this decision. Staff is not independently aware, and has not been informed by any City Council member, of any other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter. LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS The City’s Strategic Plan has five major goals: Operational Excellence, Economic Vitality, Healthy Community, Strong and Secure Neighborhoods, and a Connected Community. Chula Vista’s smart city initiatives and programs will enhance and promote all the major goals. City of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 4 of 5 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 329 File#:17-0360, Item#: 12. CURRENT YEAR FISCAL IMPACT Any financial commitments related to the implementation of the Smart City Strategic Action Plan will be brought forward for City Council consideration along with the individual projects or programs being proposed. ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT Any financial commitments related to the implementation of the Smart City Strategic Action Plan will be brought forward for City Council consideration along with the individual projects or programs being proposed. ATTACHMENTS 1. Smart City Strategic Action Plan. Staff Contact: Dennis Gakunga, Chief Sustainability Officer City of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 5 of 5 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 330 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ADOPTING THE SMART CITIES STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN WHEREAS, Chula Vista has established itself as a leader in the growing “smart city” movement, earning recognition locally, nationally and internationally for its innovative approach to using technology to create a more efficient and effective government; and WHEREAS, In an effort to clarify the city’s smart city vision and formalize a strategy going forward, staff worked with Madaffer Enterprises to develop the City of Chula Vista’s Smart City Strategic Action Plan that outlines the goals, objectives and initiatives that will help the City achieve its smart city vision; and WHEREAS, The Smart City Strategic Action Plan was developed through a collaborative process across city departments and represents the collective vision of city leadership, department heads, and stakeholders in the community; and WHEREAS, The Smart City Strategic Action Plan consists of four goals that are supported by ten objectives and thirty-six initiatives such as the development of a Citywide Telecommunications Master Plan and a Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan; and WHEREAS, the Smart City Strategic Action Plan implementation will be led by the Smart Cities Working Group, consisting of the City Manager, department directors, Police and Fire, which has been established to help coordinate efforts citywide and facilitate information sharing; and WHEREAS, the anticipated future benefits from full implementation of the Smart City Strategic Action Plan include increased efficiency of city operations, optimization of city resources, reliable broadband connectivity, enhanced public safety, and economic development growth. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, that it adopts the Smart Cities Strategic Action Plan, and directs staff to begin implementation and provide regular implementation updates and progress reports. Presented by Approved as to form by Eric C. Crockett Glen R. Googins Director of Economic Development City Attorney Economic Development 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 331 City of Chula Vista Staff Report File#:17-0338, Item#: 13. CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTING THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL COMMUNICATIONS MASTER PLAN RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ADOPTING THE CITY’S TRAFFIC SIGNAL COMMUNICATIONS MASTER PLAN (This item was continued from 8/15/2017.) RECOMMENDED ACTION Council adopt the resolution. SUMMARY On January 5, 2016, Council approved an agreement between the City of Chula Vista and STC Traffic, Inc. for the development of the City’s first Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan (the Plan). The goals of the Plan were to identify the condition of the existing communications system, clearly assess system gaps, and create a tool that could be used as a guide to implement immediate and long term communications Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) technologies to achieve a state-of-the-art traffic signal system. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Environmental Notice The Project qualifies for a Statutory Exemption pursuant to Section 15262 (Feasibility and Planning Studies) pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines. Environmental Determination The Director of Development Services has reviewed the proposed activity for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the proposed action, adoption of the Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan, falls under a Statutory Exemption pursuant to Section 15262 (Feasibility and Planning Studies) of the State CEQA Guidelines. Thus, no further environmental review is necessary, at this time. However, projects resulting from Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan, may require environmental review and a CEQA determination completed prior to commencing said project(s). BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION A draft of the Plan was presented as an informational item at the Safety Commission meeting on May 3, 2017. DISCUSSION On January 5, 2016, Council approved an agreement between the City of Chula Vista and STC Traffic, Inc. for the development of the Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan. STC staff diligently researched our existing system and records, interviewed City staff, and submitted a complete Plan in early July 2017. The new Plan encompasses four distinct and critical elements: (1) existing systems assessment, (2) needs assessment, (3) future system Architecture and ITS elements, and (4) implementation phasing City of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 1 of 3 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 332 File#:17-0338, Item#: 13. needs assessment, (3) future system Architecture and ITS elements, and (4) implementation phasing plan including cost-benefit analysis. Each of these elements account for key components to help guide the City toward effective modernization of a comprehensive traffic signal communications network which will support cutting-edge transportation systems and serve as a guiding foundation for the City’s deployment of Smart City technologies. With the City’s emphasis on technology to provide excellent and more efficient services to the public, the Plan provides the guiding framework for the repair, upgrade, and expansion of a traffic signal communications network that will utilize the latest in communications technology to provide a reliable and robust communications network for the asset owner and other departments throughout the City in need of a strong and effective communications network. Implementation of the $16M Plan is divided into three phases with a goal of full implementation within 10 years (depending on available funding). The three phases are summarized below: Phase 1: City-Owned Infrastructure (Year 1-3) ·Upgrade existing fiber optic systems to Ethernet communications ·Convert leased phone lines to City-owner wireless systems ·Install video monitoring systems at priority locations ·Upgrade traffic signal equipment to Ethernet-enabled devices Citywide Phase 2: Infrastructure & Priority Corridors Upgrade (Year 4-6) ·Install fiber optic cable in existing empty conduits ·Install conduit and fiber optic cable to resolve communications gaps ·Upgrade traffic signal equipment on priority corridors with new 2070ATC controllers and CCTV cameras Phase 3: Citywide Buildout (Year 7-10) ·Complete communications network ·Upgrade remaining traffic signal equipment with new 2070ATC controllers and CCTV cameras for remote monitoring Pending available funding, the Department of Engineering and Capital Projects, is planning to accelerate the implementation of the Plan and complete the recommended work in the next 5-7 years. This will be accomplished by aggressively seeking grant opportunities, public-public partnerships, and public-private partnerships to secure additional funding and/or share access to others’ communications infrastructure. It is also important to note that as technology rapidly evolves and as the City marches on to become a Smart City, it is critical that the recommendations in the Plan be considered by staff, and if desired, be implemented in the most efficient and expeditious manner in order to achieve the best return on our investment and to provide the public with the best available technology/systems which will enhance our citizens’ quality of life in the City of Chula Vista. As a growing city, with dozens of traffic signals yet to be built, this Plan supports our effort to utilize modern telecommunications construction methods that will result in a new network with a much greater level of service and connectivity. This new network will provide the capability to provide more efficient and effective traffic signal coordination timing, reduce travel times and greenhouse gases, and upgrade the network for future implementation of adaptive traffic control systems, video monitoring (for traffic) systems, pedestrian and bike counters, and many other ITS, autonomous and City of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 2 of 3 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 333 File#:17-0338, Item#: 13. monitoring (for traffic) systems, pedestrian and bike counters, and many other ITS, autonomous and connected vehicle, and Smart City technologies. The Plan is already in use and is serving as a guide for staff to more effectively plan, design, and implement cutting-edge technology that will provide the public with a safer and more efficient network for all modes of transportation. DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT Staff has reviewed the decision contemplated by this action and has determined that it is not site- specific and consequently, the 500-foot rule found in California Code of Regulations Title 2, section 18702.2(a)(11), is not applicable to this decision for purposes of determining a disqualifying real property-related financial conflict of interest under the Political Reform Act (Cal. Gov't Code § 87100, et seq.). LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS The City’s Strategic Plan has five major goals: Operational Excellence, Economic Vitality, Healthy Community, Strong and Secure Neighborhoods and a Connected Community. The Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan resolution supports the Operational Excellence goal, as it promotes the use of high-end equipment and technology so employees can achieve high quality public service which results in enhanced safety and efficiency to our transportation system. This resolution also supports other major goals in the Strategic Plan since the implementation of a robust traffic signal communications network and advanced ITS technologies will create a strong foundation for the more effective deployment of Smart City Initiative technologies in the very near future. CURRENT YEAR FISCAL IMPACT Passage of this resolution will not have any direct fiscal impact on the City. The City Council adopted budget includes $3.0 million in Measure P - temporary sales tax funds allocated to Traffic Signal Systems. ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT Staff will continue to actively seek grant opportunities, public-public partnerships, and public-private partnerships to secure additional funding and/or share access to others’ communications infrastructures. Future Measure P funds are also included in the Expenditure Plan for Traffic Signal projects. ATTACHMENT 1. Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Staff Contact: Eddie Flores, City Traffic Engineer, Department of Engineering and Capital Projects City of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 3 of 3 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 334 (###) (###) ### ### ### # # # # # # ### # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # ## # ### # # # #### # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # ##### ## # # # # ## ## # # #### # # # # ### # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç#Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!ñ XYXYXY XYXYXYXY XY XYXY XYXYXY !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( ") ") ")") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ")") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ")") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ")") ") ") ") ") ") ")#* #*#*#*#*#*#*#*#* #* #*#*#* #*#*#* ") ") !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$50 8 !"#$50 8 ·|}þ54·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 E J ST MAIN ST VA HT40I ST OLYMPIC PY H ST03RD AV J ST E ST L ST F ST BAY BLO TAY LAKESRD BROADWAYK ST E PALOM A R S THILLTOP DR D ST 01ST AV MOSS ST PALOMAR ST05TH AV NAPLES S T T E L E GRAPH CA NYONRD ANITA ST 02ND AV E L ST E NAPLE S S T ORANGE AV G ST C ST PASEOLADERAB O N IT A R D E I ST EOR A N G E A V E OXFO RD ST FLOWE R S T S R A N C H O D E L R E Y PY N R A NCHODELREYPY PASEO D E LREYN0 2 NDAVCREST DRE F L O W E R S T E PALOM A R D R E H ST 05TH AV K ST02ND AV I ST 01ST AVBAY BL G ST ANITA STANITA ST 03RD AVC ST NATIONAL CITY SAN DIEGO S.D. COUNTY LANDFILL S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY (112) 83(112) 80 (113) 68 (106) 28 (114) 73 (113) 89 (103) 41 (117) 94 (117) 90 (117) 91 (109) 31 (114) 72 (113) 71 (109) 55 (108) 54 (108) 53 (105) 24 (113) 70 (109) 58 (109) 56 (106) 32 (105) 26 (105) 25 (106) 27 (123) 22 (103) 23 (113) 69(108) 52 (109) 51(105) 40 (108) 79 (103) 17 (108) 49 (108) 50(105) 39 (104) 38(123) 20 (110) 81 (108) 84(108) 82 (111) 63 (111) 85 (102) 11 (102) 12 (110) 77(102) 13 (110) 78 (108) 44(104) 33 (123) 15 (104) 37 (108) 48 (108) 47(104) 36 (123) 16 (123) 21 (111) 86 (112) 67 (112) 66 (112) 65 (123) 19 (123) 18 (108) 46(104) 35 (108) 64 (104) 34 (107) 45 (107) 43 (118) 98 (108) 93 (116) 99 (125) 125 (121) 143 (117) 286 (114) 219 (103) 281 (103) 280 (117) 278 (113) 260 (120) 217 (120) 213 (106) 136 (120) 121 (117) 104 (125) 126 (117) 105 (117) 103 (116) 154 (103) 146 (125) 127 (117) 168 (116) 110 (125) 124 (105) 192 (107) 149 (115) 108 (121) 107 (125) 142 (117) 287 (116) 102 (120) 112 (103) 254 (127) 246 (127) 229 (118) 218 (120) 216 (127) 139 (118) 165 (118) 170 (118) 174 (118) 163 (118) 162 (118) 141 (118) 169 (118) 153 (118) 144 (126) 132 (126) 131 (126) 129 (116) 100 (116) 101 (126) 140 (126) 133 (127) 167 (127) 138 (127) 137 (118) 199 (116) 197 (116) 193 I NDUSTRIAL BLBRANDYWINE AVBONITA R D FLOWER S T PASEO RANCHEROMEDICAL CENTER DRN 04TH AVTIERRA DEL REY03RD AVE TS HT70E NAPLES CT MAIN STMAIN ST 113 (115) 92 (106) 29 (109) 57 (103) 30 (114) 75 (114) 74 (114) 76 (114) 59 (113) 88 (115) 87 (110) 61 (110) 60 (102) 14 (115) 95 (110) 62 (107) 42 (118) 96 (118) 97 (109) 279 (116) 109 (121) 106 (102) 151 (127) 230 (118) 156 (118) 166 (126) 130 (120) 122 (126) 111 CITY OF CHULA VISTA TRAFFIC SIGNAL COMMUNICATIONS MASTER PLAN Prepared By:JULY 2017 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 335 July 13, 2017 VERSION DATE STATUS 1 11/29/16 Issued for City Review 2 12/23/16 Issued for City Review 3 3/17/17 Issued for City Review 4 6/23/17 Submitted Final Draft 5 7/13/17 Submitted Final Report CITY OF CHULA VISTA Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 336 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | i Table of Contents Executive Summary _________________________________________________________________ 1 E1 Need ................................................................................................................................................ 1 E2 Purpose, Goals and Objectives ........................................................................................................ 2 E3 Key Recommendations .................................................................................................................... 2 E4 Implementation Phasing ................................................................................................................. 3 E5 Order of Magnitude Cost Estimate ................................................................................................. 4 E6 Cost and Benefit Analysis ................................................................................................................ 4 1 Introduction ___________________________________________________________________ 1 1.1 City Setting ............................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 City Initiatives ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Consistency with Regional, State, and National Architectures and Plans ................................ 3 1.3.1 San Diego Region Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Strategic Plan ___________ 3 1.3.2 California Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) _______________________________ 3 1.3.3 National ITS Architecture _________________________________________________ 4 1.4 Purpose and Goals ................................................................................................................... 4 1.5 Objectives ................................................................................................................................. 4 1.6 Document Organization ........................................................................................................... 5 2 Existing Systems Assessment ______________________________________________________ 7 2.1 Traffic Communications Systems.............................................................................................. 7 2.1.1 Single-mode Fiber Optic Network __________________________________________ 8 2.1.2 Leased Line and City-Owned Copper Wire Based Analog Network ________________ 8 2.1.3 Serial Wireless Radio Communications ______________________________________ 9 2.1.4 Cell Towers ____________________________________________________________ 9 2.2 Central Systems ........................................................................................................................ 9 2.2.1 Traffic Signal Communications Center and Traffic Management Center ____________ 9 2.2.2 Central Traffic Management System _______________________________________ 11 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 337 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | ii 2.2.3 Adaptive Signal Control _________________________________________________ 11 2.3 Field Elements and Traffic Operations ................................................................................... 13 2.3.1 Cabinets and Controllers ________________________________________________ 13 2.3.2 Traffic Signal Timing and Coordination _____________________________________ 13 2.3.3 Grade Crossing Preemption ______________________________________________ 14 2.3.4 Transit Signal Priority ___________________________________________________ 14 2.3.5 Emergency Vehicle Preemption ___________________________________________ 14 2.3.6 Data Acquisition Systems ________________________________________________ 16 2.4 Traffic Operations Staff........................................................................................................... 18 2.4.1 Traffic Engineering Section _______________________________________________ 18 2.4.2 Traffic Signal Maintenance Group _________________________________________ 19 2.5 Communications System Topology and Architecture ............................................................ 19 2.5.1 Existing Traffic Systems Topology __________________________________________ 20 2.5.2 Existing Traffic Systems Communications Architecture _________________________ 20 2.5.3 Regional Communications Infrastructure ___________________________________ 24 3 Needs Assessment _____________________________________________________________ 25 3.1 Stakeholder Outreach ............................................................................................................ 25 3.2 Deficiency Identification ........................................................................................................ 25 3.2.1 Traffic Communications System Deficiencies ________________________________ 25 3.2.2 Central Systems Deficiencies _____________________________________________ 26 3.2.3 Field Elements and Traffic Operations Deficiencies ____________________________ 27 3.2.4 Communications Gap Identification _______________________________________ 27 3.3 Future Roadway Projects ....................................................................................................... 30 3.3.1 Future Traffic Signals ___________________________________________________ 31 3.3.2 Future Traffic Communications Systems ____________________________________ 31 3.3.3 Future Adaptive Traffic Control System _____________________________________ 32 3.3.4 Future Coordinated Corridors ____________________________________________ 32 3.3.5 Future Roadways ______________________________________________________ 34 3.3.6 Future Roadway Widening _______________________________________________ 34 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 338 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | iii 3.4 SANDAG 2050 RTP .................................................................................................................. 34 4 Future System Architecture and ITS Elements ________________________________________ 36 4.1 Future Network Standardization ............................................................................................ 36 4.2 Future Network Architecture Examples ................................................................................. 38 4.2.1 TSCC Communication Ports ______________________________________________ 45 4.2.2 Bandwidth Requirements _______________________________________________ 46 4.2.3 IP Addressing Scheme __________________________________________________ 47 4.3 Smart City Chula Vista ............................................................................................................ 48 4.3.1 Automated Vehicle Proving Grounds _______________________________________ 48 4.3.2 I-805 Active Traffic and Demand Management _______________________________ 48 4.3.3 Connected Vehicle Technology ___________________________________________ 49 4.3.4 Intelligent Street Lighting ________________________________________________ 51 4.3.5 Advanced Transportation Controllers (ATC) __________________________________ 51 4.3.6 Future Technology Applications ___________________________________________ 51 5 Implementation Phasing Plan ____________________________________________________ 53 5.1 Phase 1: City-Owned Infrastructure (Year 1-3) ...................................................................... 53 5.2 Phase 2: Infrastructure and Priority Corridors Upgrade (Year 4-6) ........................................ 54 5.3 Phase 3: Citywide Buildout (Year 7-10) .................................................................................. 54 5.4 Cell Towers ............................................................................................................................. 58 5.5 Long-Term System Considerations ......................................................................................... 58 5.6 Fiber Optic Communication Rings Topology .......................................................................... 58 5.7 Order of Magnitude Cost Estimate ........................................................................................ 61 5.8 Connection to City Facilities ................................................................................................... 62 5.9 Funding Sources ..................................................................................................................... 64 5.9.1 Transportation Sales Tax (TransNet) ________________________________________ 64 5.9.2 General Use Sales Tax ___________________________________________________ 64 5.9.3 Gas Tax ______________________________________________________________ 64 5.9.4 Development Impact Fees (DIF) ___________________________________________ 64 5.9.5 City General Funds/Capital Improvement Program ___________________________ 65 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 339 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | iv 5.9.6 Grant Opportunities ____________________________________________________ 65 5.9.7 Assembly Bill 1447 _____________________________________________________ 66 5.9.8 Partnerships __________________________________________________________ 66 5.10 Procurement and Delivery Methods ...................................................................................... 68 5.10.1 Best Value Procurement _________________________________________________ 68 5.10.2 Design-Bid-Build _______________________________________________________ 68 5.10.3 Design-Build __________________________________________________________ 68 5.10.4 System Manager – Integrator_____________________________________________ 69 5.11 Master Plan Cost and Benefit Analysis ................................................................................... 69 5.11.1 Master Plan Costs ______________________________________________________ 69 5.11.2 Master Plan Benefits ___________________________________________________ 70 5.11.3 Cost Effectiveness ______________________________________________________ 72 5.11.4 Master Plan Maintenance _______________________________________________ 72 6 References ___________________________________________________________________ 73 Appendices Appendix A: Existing Traffic Systems Topology and Future Improvements Opportunity Areas Appendix B: Existing Traffic Signal Communications Architecture Appendix C: Future Transportation Projects and Traffic Signals Appendix D: Future Traffic Signal Communications Architecture Appendix E: Order of Magnitude Cost Estimates Appendix F: Future Traffic Signal Communication Network Map 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 340 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | v List of Figures Figure 2-1 TSCC Before and After ................................................................................................................ 10 Figure 2-2 TMC Before and After ................................................................................................................ 10 Figure 2-3 RAMS Network ........................................................................................................................... 11 Figure 2-4 SCATS Network ........................................................................................................................... 12 Figure 2-5 Existing Coordinated Corridors .................................................................................................. 15 Figure 2-6 Traffic Systems Staff Organization Chart .................................................................................... 18 Figure 2-7 Existing Traffic Signals Attribute Table ....................................................................................... 21 Figure 2-8 Existing Copper Interconnect Cable Attribute Table .................................................................. 21 Figure 2-9 Existing Fiber Optic Cable Attribute Table.................................................................................. 22 Figure 2-10 Existing Wireless Traffic Interconnect Attribute Table ............................................................. 22 Figure 2-11 Existing Traffic Systems Communication Network ................................................................... 23 Figure 3-1 Communications Gaps ............................................................................................................... 29 Figure 3-2 Future Coordinated Corridor Network ...................................................................................... 33 Figure 3-3 Future Road Network ................................................................................................................. 35 Figure 4-1 Future CORE Ring Network Topology Example .......................................................................... 37 Figure 4-2 Future Fiber and Copper Rings Network Topology Example ..................................................... 39 Figure 4-3 Future Fiber Switch Ring Topology Example .............................................................................. 40 Figure 4-4 Future VDSL Copper Switch Ring Network To pology Example .................................................. 41 Figure 4-5 Future VDSL Copper Switch Ring to Fiber Switch Ring Topology ............................................... 42 Figure 4-6 Future IoT over Cellular Wireless Network Topology Example .................................................. 43 Figure 4-7 Future Owned Wireless Network Topology Example ................................................................ 44 Figure 4-8 Future Redundant and Self-Healing Ring Architecture .............................................................. 45 Figure 5-1 Phase 1 Improvements .............................................................................................................. 55 Figure 5-2 Phase 2 Improvements .............................................................................................................. 56 Figure 5-3 Phase 3 Improvements .............................................................................................................. 57 Figure 5-4 Fiber Optic Communication Rings Topology .............................................................................. 60 Figure 5-5 Communications System Extension per City Facilities ............................................................... 63 Figure 5-6 Annual Master Plan Investment by Phase ................................................................................. 71 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 341 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | vi List of Tables Table ES-0-1 Citywide Master Plan Deployment Cost Estimate .................................................................... 4 Table 2-1 Existing Single-mode Fiber Optic Strand Counts ........................................................................... 8 Table 2-2 Existing Serial Wireless Radio Interconnect Locations .................................................................. 9 Table 2-3 Existing Coordinated Corridors .................................................................................................... 13 Table 2-4 Traffic Measurement Devices Location Summary ....................................................................... 17 Table 2-5 Summary of Inventory Information for Existing Conditions Dynamic Layer Set ......................... 19 Table 2-6 Existing Traffic Signal Communications Summary ....................................................................... 20 Table 3-1 Traffic Signal Communications Infrastructure and Deficiencies Summary .................................. 28 Table 4-1 ITS Data Applications Summary ................................................................................................... 52 Table 5-1 Long-Term System Improvement Order of Magnitude Costs ...................................................... 58 Table 5-2 Phase 1 Deployment Cost Estimate ............................................................................................. 61 Table 5-3 Phase 2 Deployment Cost Estimate ............................................................................................. 61 Table 5-4 Phase 3 Deployment Cost Estimate ............................................................................................. 62 Table 5-5 Deployment Cost Estimate by Phase ........................................................................................... 62 Table 5-6 Deployment Cost Estimate of Connection to City Facilities ........................................................ 62 Table 5-7 FY 17/18-FY 21/22 Forecasted CIP Budget .................................................................................. 65 Table 5-8 Master Plan Spending by Phase .................................................................................................. 70 Table 5-9 Phase 1 Benefit Summary (Per Year) ........................................................................................... 70 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 342 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | vii List of Acronyms AASHTO ……………………………………………. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials ALOS ……………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………… Arterial Level of Service API …………………………………………………………………………………………………..… Application Programming Interface ATC ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Advanced Traffic Controller ATCMTD …………………..… Advanced Transportation and Congestion Management Technologies Deployment ATCS ………………………………………………………………………………………………………... Adaptive Traffic Control System ATP ……………………………………………………………………………………………………...…… Active Transportation Program ATT ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. Arterial Travel Time AV …………………………………………………………………………….………………………………………………… Automated Vehicle BBS …………………………………………………………………………………………………….………………… Battery Backup System BPS …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..……… Bits Per Second Caltrans ……………………………………………………………………………………… California Department of Transportation CAT ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………………… Category CCTV ………………………………………………………………………………………………….……………….. Closed Circuit Television CDBG ……………………………………………………………………..……………………… Community Development Block Grant CIP ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………. Capital Improvement Program CMU …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………....... Conflict Monitor Unit COM …………………………………………………………………………………………………...………………………… Communications CVBMP …………………………………………………………………..……………………………… Chula Vista Bayfront Master Plan DAR …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Direct Access Ramp DIF …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Development Impact Fees DMS ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Dynamic Message Sign DSRC ………………………………………………….……………………………………… Dedicated Short Range Communications EIR ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Environmental Impact Report EPA ………………………………………………………………………………… United States Environmental Protection Agency EV ………………………………………………………………………………..…………………………………………………… Electric Vehicle EVP ………………………………………………………………………………………………….……… Emergency Vehicle Preemption 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 343 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | viii FAST …………………………………………………………………………………….. Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act FES ………………………………………………………………………………………………………..………………… Field Ethernet Switch FWG ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Fiber Working Group FY…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..………………………… Fiscal Year GHG ………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………… Green House Gas GIS ………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Geographic Information Systems GMOC ………………………………………………………………………………… Growth Management Oversight Commission GPS ……………………………………………………………………………………………..…………………… Global Positioning System Hi-Res……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… High-Resolution HSIP…………………………………………………………………………………………… Highway Safety Improvements Program IoT ………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………… Internet of Things IP……………………………………………………….………………………………………………………………………… Internet Protocol IR ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Infrared IT ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Information Technology ITS ………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Intelligent Transportation System JPO …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Joint Program Office LED …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Light Emitting Diode MBPS ……………………………………………….……………………………………………………………………… Megabits Per Second MFES ……………………………………………………………..………………………………………… Managed Field Ethernet Switch MTS ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Metropolitan Transit System NTCIP ……………………………………………………………… National Transportation Communications for ITS Protocol POTS ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..……… Plain Old Telephone Service PTZ ………………………………………………………………………………………………..…………………………………… Pan-Tilt-Zoom QoS ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….……… Quality of Service RAMS …………………………………………………………………………………………… Regional Arterial Management System ROI ……………………………………………………………………………………………………….………………… Return on Investment RTCM ………………………………………………………………………… Radio Technical Commission for Maritime Services RTMS ……………………………………………………………………………….………………… Remote Traffic Microwave Sensors RTP ………………………………………………………………………………………..…………………… Regional Transportation Plan 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 344 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | ix SANDAG ….…………………………………………………………………………………… San Diego Association of Governments SCATS …………………………………………………………………………………… Sydney Coordinated Adaptive Traffic System SCN ……………………………………………………………………………………………..……………………… System Control Number SFP ………………………………………………………………………………………………………….……………………… Single Fiber Port SHSP …………………………………………………………………………………..……………………… Strategic Highway Safety Plan SPA ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Sectional Planning Area SPaT …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Signal Phase and Timing TDIF ……………………………………..…………………………………………………… Transportation Development Impact Fee TMC ……………………………………………………………………………………….……………………… Traffic Management Center TMP ………………………………………………….…………………………………………………………… Traffic Monitoring Program TOD ……………………………….………………………………………………………………………..………………….………… Time of Day TSCC ……………………………………………….……………………………………………… Traffic Signal Communications Center ULOS …………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Urban Street Level of Service USDOT ………………………………………………………………………………… United States Department of Transportation V2I ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Vehicle to Infrastructure VDSL …………………………………………………………………………………….…… Very High Bit Rate Digital Subscriber Line VOS ……………………………..……………………………………………………………….………………… Volume-Occupancy-Speed 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 345 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | ES-1 Executive Summary The City of Chula Vista is preparing for the next generation of technology which will support the City’s smart growth and development. At the core of the City’s “Smart City” initiatives are investments in Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) infrastructure. Through leveraging state-of-the-art communications systems and Internet of Things (IoT) devices the city will have the ability to gather and analyze data to gain insights into infrastructure and travel that will lead to better transportation system management and overall improvement in public services. The Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan purpose (hereby referred to as Master Plan) is to guide the City’s investment and implementation in traffic signal communications systems and ITS technology. Chula Vista is San Diego County’s second largest and fastest growing city. The Master Plan is critical to ensure the City ’s current and future transportation system needs and objectives are realized through this growth. Most importantly, the implementation of the Master Plan will promote the City’s vision of sustainability, economic vitality and high quality of life – through the significant benefits of traffic systems technology and improved traffic management and operations. E1 Need The communications system is the most critical part of a traffic management system and delivers information from City streets and intersections back to the Traffic Management Center (TMC) where the management and operation activities take place. The City of Chula Vista monitors and manages 267 traffic signals, providing safe movement at signalized intersections for vehicles, pedestrians, bicyclists, emergency vehicles, transit, and rail1. The City of Chula Vista is the fastest growing City in San Diego County and is expected to add in the order of 100 new traffic signals in the next five to ten years2. Like many municipalities in San Diego County, the Chula Vista traffic signal communication system operates legacy equipment and obsolete communication protocol. POTS (Plain Old Telephone Service) leased lines provide the primary communication links between groups of traffic signals and the traffic equipment room in City Hall. There are several limiting factors associated with this antiquated communication architecture: modern devices with desirable capabilities do not support the legacy protocols, the existing communication bandwidth is a fraction of modern systems, operating and maintaining the existing communications and legacy devices is increasingly difficult and expensive, and the City relies on a third- party service provider which is costly3. To sum it up, the existing traffic communications system is functionally obsolete and costly. As the City continues to experience rapid growth and development it is critical to plan for new technology that will promote efficient management and operations in the modern traffic environment. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 346 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | ES-2 E2 Purpose, Goals and ObjecƟves The purpose of the Master Plan is to create a detailed inventory of the City’s communications systems and to guide the City’s future traffic signal communications and ITS technology improvements. An intelligent traffic signal communications system is beneficial in many ways and promotes goals including: increased roadway safety, shortened commute times, travel reliability, reduced greenhouse gasses, economic and sustainable growth, and increased mobility at signalized intersections for all modes of travel including motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians, transit, and emergency vehicles. The traffic signal communications system is essential for Chula Vista to provide a proactive approach to traffic management and all around better service to the traveling public. The Master Plan provides a framework to strategically achieve the following primary objectives: Develop system topology and network architecture for a future-proof city-owned communication platform concept. Leverage existing communications infrastructure investments to support new systems and technologies. Establish solutions for existing system deficiencies. Eliminate 3rd party service for traffic signal communications. Identify current and future traffic system needs and leverage new technology to meet the needs. Incorporate recommendations into other City planning and development projects. Support other City departments communication system needs. • Identify connections to City initiatives including Smart City and Climate Action that will benefit from the Master Plan. • Identify potential partnerships with regional public agencies and private entities to advance master plan implementation. Establish consistent ITS infrastructure improvements through the various capital improvement channels. Develop an implementation prioritization and phasing strategy. Estimate order of magnitude costs, assess resources, and system benefits. E3 Key RecommendaƟons Key communications systems and ITS element recommendations identified in the Master Plan are summarized below and in the following section. The City of Chula Vista future traffic signal communication system network will be based on Ethernet protocol. The future network will combine multiple communications medium such as single mode fiber, existing copper plant, point-to-multipoint wireless, and cellular. Goals Purpose Objectives Goals Purpose Objectives 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 347 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | ES-3 The future “CORE” network will use Layer 3 nodes connecting to each other via single mode fiber links. E4 ImplementaƟon Phasing The highest priorities include establishing a City-owned traffic signal communication system and implementing Ethernet-compatible systems/network. Existing investments in communication infrastructure, underground systems, signal interconnect cable, and traffic signal cabinets will continue to be utilized. Obsolete legacy network equipment will be upgraded or decommissioned and replaced with new modern communication technologies. The timeframe for each phase of implementation is based on available funding and could be accelerated as additional funds are made available. Phase 1: City-Owned Infrastructure (Year 1-3) Phase 1 of the implementation plan includes providing a wholly City-owned traffic signal communication network, converting from Serial to an all Ethernet-based network, upgrading traffic signal controllers to Ethernet protocol, and establishing video monitoring at the City’s highest priority locations. The following summarizes the Phase 1 traffic signal communications network upgrades: • Upgrade existing fiber optic system to Ethernet communications. • Convert leased copper lines to City-owned wireless Ethernet radio communications. • Upgrade City-owned copper lines to Ethernet-over-copper communications. • Install City-owned wireless Ethernet radio communications at all offline traffic signals. • Convert leased cellular network for existing Traffic Measurement Devices to City-owned wireless Ethernet radio communications. • Install video monitoring devices at high priority locations. • Install fixed Dynamic Message Signs at the Chula Vista Amphitheater. • Obtain 2 portable Dynamic Message Signs for use during planned or unforeseen major traffic impacting events. • Install a satellite Traffic Management Center at the City’s Traffic Operations Maintenance Facility. • Upgrade all traffic signal equipment to Ethernet-enabled devices Citywide. • Implement Layer 3 communication hubs at strategic locations. Phase 2: Infrastructure and Priority Corridors Upgrade (Year 4-6) Phase 2 of the Implementation Plan prioritizes fiber optic communications. Strategic signalized intersections along priority corridors throughout the City will be upgraded to include type 2070 ATC traffic signal controllers and closed circuit televisions (CCTV) cameras for remote video monitoring. The following summarizes the Phase 2 traffic signal communications network upgrades: • Upgrade existing empty communications conduit and install fiber optic cable. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 348 ChulaVistaTraffic SignalCommunicationsMasterPlanPage|ES-4 Ȉ Installconduitandfiberopticcabletoresolvecommunicationsgapsinthenetworkandcreate redundantringtopology. Ȉ Upgradetrafficsignalequipmentonprimaryfiberopticringroutewithfiberdevices. Ȉ Upgradetrafficsignalequipmentonprioritycorridorswithnew2070controllersandCCTVcameras. Phase3:CitywideBuildout(Year7-10) BuildoutofthetrafficsignalcommunicationsnetworkwillbecompletedinPhase3.Remainingsignalized intersectionswillbeupgradedwithtype2070ATC trafficsignalcontrollersandclosed-circuittelevision (CCTV)camerasforremotevideomonitoring. E5OrderofMagnitudeCostEsƟmate AsummaryofthecostsforthedeploymentoftheMasterPlan,brokendownbytheimplementation phase,isshownonTable ES-1. Table ES-0-1CitywideMasterPlanDeploymentCostEstimate PHASEDESCRIPTIONTOTAL 1City-OwnedInfrastructure$4,794,750 2InfrastructureandPriorityCorridorUpgrades$7,092,075 3CitywideBuildout$3,949,500 GRANDTOTAL $15,836,325 Note:Eachphasewillbeimplementedinstagesasfundingbecomesavailable. TheorderofmagnitudecostestimatefortheMasterPlanimplementationis$15,836,325. E6CostandBeneĮtAnalysis Theannualbenefit-costratio forimplementingPhase1is65:1.Thisindicatesthatimprovementswould yieldbenefitsof$65foreverydollarspent.WithcostsavingsexceedingtheStateandNationalbenefit- costratiorangeof20to60:1returnoninvestment(ROI)forPhase1alone,themonetaryinvestments identifiedintheMasterPlanarepoisedtoberecapturedmanytimesoverforbotheconomicandsocial benefit. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 349 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 1 1 Introduction The City of Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan establishes the planning framework for implementing state-of-the-art communications technology and Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) elements to meet the City’s immediate and long-term traffic system needs. The City has placed great emphasis on immediate and long-range planning in its continued effort to strike a balance between quality of life and growth. The Master Plan is a central element to the City’s overall planning framework and establishes a proactive approach to better serve the public through state-of-the-art traffic systems technology. The Master Plan was initiated to address two overarching needs: (1) the immediate need to replace the existing obsolete systems that inhibit staff’s ability to efficiently manage the traffic signal system and (2) address the long term need to establish a future-proof platform that supports growth and enables the City to implement and utilize future transportation systems technology. The Master Plan provides concepts, assessments, and illustrations in one comprehensive guiding document for staff’s use in preparing the future City traffic signal communication system and ITS infrastructure. 1.1 City Seƫng The City of Chula Vista has a population of over 260,000 people1, covers an area of 52.1 square miles2, is the 2nd largest City in San Diego County3, and is the 14th largest City in the State of California4. Chula Vista is also the fastest growing City in the San Diego Region with large areas of planned development. To give the City’s growth context, the City’s General Plan anticipates a population of over 300,000 residents by 2030, and an additional 100 new traffic signals. 1.2 City IniƟaƟves The City promotes the orderly management of growth in a manner that maintains a balance between quality of life, the environment and economic stability by applying the General Plan and related supporting San Diego County Chula Vista 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 350 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 2 plans. The City is a recognized leader in conservation and renewable energy implementing policies that have led Chula Vista to become a smarter city, with development practices now delivering many Smart City initiatives. A sample of Chula Vista’s Smart City initiatives include: • The Bayfront Smart City which brings the latest in infrastructure technology for maximum energy efficiency and sustainability outcomes to the largest waterfront development on the West Coast5. • One of the densest networks of Electric Vehicle (EV) charging stations in the Country6. • Constructed and opened a new state-of-the-art Traffic Management Center and Traffic Signal Communication Center in January 2017. • Implementation of a new state-of-the-art Adaptive Traffic Control System (ATCS). • The ACT Chula Vista citizen web portal connecting citizens with each other and City services creating a web-based connected community platform7. • Competed for the USDOT’s Smart City Challenge in 2016 which became the impetus for Chula Vista being selected as an “Autonomous Vehicle Proving Ground” in January 2017 – one of ten sites chosen by the USDOT to collaborate and test the practicality of autonomous cars on public roads. • Received the 2014 EPA Center for Corporate Leadership, Climate Leadership Award for exemplary climate actions. The Master Plan connects into and supports many existing forward reaching initiatives in the City’s planning structure including: • City of Chula Vista General Plan. • Chula Vista Bayfront Master Plan. • City of Chula Vista Climate Action Plan. • City of Chula Vista Clean Transportation Energy Roadmap. • City of Chula Vista Strategic Plan. • City of Chula Vista City Operations Sustainability Plan. • City of Chula Vista Growth Management Program. • City of Chula Vista Neighborhood Traffic and Pedestrian Safety Program. • City of Chula Vista Pedestrian Master Plan. • City of Chula Vista Bikeway Master Plan. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 351 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 3 1.3 Consistency with Regional, State, and NaƟonal Architectures and Plans The "V" Diagram is the standard way to represent the systems engineering process for ITS projects. Following this process reduces risk, controls cost and schedule, improves quality, and results in a system that meets the user needs8. The Master Plan is the earliest planning stage (pre-design) of the systems engineering process and presents high- level concepts and architecture and supports initial needs identification. The Master Plan lays the groundwork for capital improvement programming, prioritization, and budgeting for future identified projects through subsequent parts of the systems engineering process. 1.3.1 San Diego Region Intelligent Transporta Ɵon Systems (ITS) Strategic Plan The San Diego Region ITS Strategic Plan provides a unified vision for regional ITS investment strategies that regional transportation agencies prioritized for funding and implementation9. The ITS Strategic Plan provides policy guidance and articulates the common vision for the employment of ITS technologies to improve mobility, safety, efficiency, and reliability throughout the region and is a supporting document to San Diego Forward (The Regional Plan) and the SANDAG 2050 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP)10. The Master Plan will advance the regional goals to the next level in Chula Vista by identifying specific ITS technologies, deployment strategies, and the resources required. 1.3.2 California Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) The California Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) identifies signal timing and ITS tools as appropriate safety countermeasures for intersection crashes11. The California Local Roadway Safety Manual also identifies improved signal timing, coordination, and operation as a safety benefit to address locations that have a crash history at multiple signalized intersections12. The Master Plan recommends systems necessary for implementing traffic signal control strategies, including coordinated traffic signal operations. This will maximize throughput, minimize stops and reduce delay on roadways. In turn, there will be fewer intersection red-light violations, a reduction in aggressive driver behavior, and a decrease in intersection crashes. Master Planning 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 352 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 4 1.3.3 NaƟonal ITS Architecture The National ITS Architecture provides a common framework for planning, defining, and integrating ITS. It is a mature architecture that reflects the contributions of a broad cross-section of the ITS community (e.g., transportation practitioners, systems engineers, system developers, technology specialists). It is comprised of three primary layers: communications, transportation, and institutional which set the building block for ITS development13. The Master Plan addresses the communication layer of the National Architecture. Communications systems are the wireline and wireless systems and equipment that provide paths and connections to transmit information. The City relies on the communications system to support management and operation of the many functional aspects of the City’s transportation system. 1.4 Purpose and Goals The purpose of the Master Plan is to guide the replacement of existing obsolete systems that inhibit staff’s ability to efficiently manage the traffic signal system and to establish a platform for the City to implement and utilize future transportation systems technology. The plan represents a significant opportunity for the City of Chula Vista to advance traffic signal communications systems and supporting elements to the technological forefront. An intelligent traffic signal communication system is beneficial in many ways and promotes: increased roadway safety, shortened commute times, travel reliability, reduced greenhouse gasses, and economic and sustainable growth. The Master Plan will open doors to opportunities including: access to grant funding, coordination with various projects and developments, cost savings on leased communications for numerous City needs, providing a future proof platform, and advancing related Smart City and Climate Action initiatives. The Master Plan ultimately improves mobility through robust communications and enhanced traffic signal management and operations for all modes of transportation including motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians, transit, and emergency vehicles. 1.5 ObjecƟves The traffic signal communication system is essential for Chula Vista to provide a proactive approach to traffic management and all around better service to the traveling public. The plan provides a framework to strategically achieve the following primary objectives: Develop system topology and network architecture for a future-proof city-owned communication platform concept. Leverage existing communications infrastructure investments to support new systems and technologies. Establish resolutions for existing system deficiencies. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 353 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 5 Eliminate 3rd party service for traffic signal communications. Identify current and future traffic system needs and leverage new technology to meet the needs. Incorporate recommendations into other City planning and development projects. Support other City departments communication system needs. • Identify connections to City initiatives including Smart City and Climate Action that will benefit from the Master Plan. • Identify potential partnerships with regional public agencies and private entities to advance master plan implementation. Establish consistent ITS infrastructure improvements through the various capital improvement channels. Develop an implementation prioritization and phasing strategy. Estimate order of magnitude costs, assess resources, and system benefits. 1.6 Document OrganizaƟon The remainder of this document is organized into three sections as described below: Existing Systems Assessment Presents the extensive research and corresponding inventories completed for existing traffic systems throughout the City including: communications systems, central systems, field elements and traffic operations, and staff organization. The results of the existing systems assessment are presented on system architecture maps and schematics in the Appendix. Needs Assessment This section is divided into two primary subsections: existing system deficiencies and future roadway network needs. The existing system deficiencies and needs build on the existing systems assessment. The City’s future transportation network plans are also presented to identify where the traffic signal communications infrastructure will be required. The results of the existing deficiency and future transportation network research are summarized on figures and maps included in the section. Future System Architecture and ITS Elements This section presents the network and ITS elements, standardization, topology, physical and logical requirements to achieve the future communication system concept. Several architecture examples are provided to demonstrate system connectivity and resiliency. This section also presents the communication system relation to Chula Vista Smart City transportation initiatives. A schematic detailing the future traffic system communications architecture concept is provided in the Appendix. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 354 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 6 Implementation Phasing and Cost-Benefit Analysis Presents a strategic implementation phasing plan that includes deployment prioritization and phasing. Order of magnitude cost estimates for technical solutions to communications deficiencies are presented for each phase, and the phased future traffic signal communication map concept is provided. This section also presents an analysis of the costs and benefits associated with implementation of the Master Plan recommendations by deployment phases. The timeframe for each implementation phase is dependent on available funding and is subject to acceleration as additional funds are made available. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 355 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 7 2 Existing Systems Assessment The basis for planning the concept of the future communication system architecture is laid upon the foundation of the existing traffic signal and communication system infrastructure. This section documents the results of extensive research and inventories of the City’s existing traffic systems including: communications, central systems, field elements, operations, and staff. Several sources of information were utilized to obtain information including: • Geographic Information Systems (GIS). • Laser fiche as-built records. • Accounting systems. • QuicNet and SCATS systems. • Field reviews. • Interviews with city staff. Documentation was obtained from various city departments including: Public Works/Engineering, GIS, Information Technology (IT), Development Services, and Planning. Shapefiles with attribute tables detailing the number and location for existing traffic signals, conduit, and wireless towers was provided by the City’s Geographic Information Services (GIS) Department. A digital library comprising 910 researched plans and documents of the City’s traffic systems was created. The various information sources were compared and verified with City traffic signal maintenance staff to produce an accurate map of existing traffic systems Citywide. At the time of this report, 267 traffic signals are owned and operated by the City of Chula Vista. A Geographical Information System (GIS) database and map of the existing systems infrastructure was created and is provided in Appendix A and a schematic detailing the existing traffic system communications architecture is provided in Appendix B. Detailed review information is presented throughout the remainder of this section. 2.1 Tra ffic CommunicaƟons Systems The City of Chula Vista’s traffic communications system is extensive, connecting all the existing traffic signals and traffic data collection systems in the City, and is comprised of numerous media and network devices. Traffic communication system documentation was researched to determine location and status of: • Single-mode fiber optic network. • Third-party owned leased line wire based analog network. • City-owned copper wire based analog network. • Serial wireless radio communications network. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 356 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 8 The communications system includes a combination of twisted pair copper wired based media, fiber optic cable media, and Serial digital wireless radios. Third-party owned and serviced Plain Old Telephone Service (POTS) leased lines provide the primary communication links between traffic systems and the City’s existing Traffic Signal Communication Center (TSCC) located at City Hall. The following subsections provide summaries of the existing traffic communications systems and network architecture. 2.1.1 Single-mode Fiber OpƟc Network Single-mode fiber optic cable provides communications between the TSCC and 25 traffic signals located along Fourth Avenue, H Street, and Main Street. Fiber strand counts are summarized in Table 2-1. Table 2-1 Existing Single-mode Fiber Optic Strand Counts STREET (NORTH/EAST) LIMIT (SOUTH/WEST) LIMIT CABLE Fourth Avenue (N) Brisbane Street (S) Main Street 288-strand SMFOC Main Street (E) Main Street (W) Broadway 288-strand SMFOC Davidson Street (E) Fourth Avenue (W) Guava Avenue 288-strand SMFOC H Street (E) Hidden Vista Drive (W) Fourth Avenue 36-strand SMFOC 2.1.2 Leased Line and City-Owned Copper Wire Based Analog Network Accounting systems that contained information on the City’s third-party owned leased line communications for various traffic systems throughout Chula Vista were researched. Billing information identified circuit numbers that corresponded with the City’s TSCC and the individual traffic system telephone drop locations. The location information was cross-checked and verified with the System Control Number (SCN) address reference table provided by the City’s traffic signal maintenance department and the traffic signal controller list generated by the City’s QuicNet 4+ central traffic management system. Billing statements indicate approximately $75,000 is spent annually on leased line communications1. Nearly 90% of the City’s 267 traffic signals communicate with the TSCC through a third-party owned POTS leased line network. The existing AT&T lease line telephone drops provide communication links between the TSCC and individual traffic signals or groups of traffic signals, interconnected by the City-owned copper wire based analog multi-drop network. The original leased lines were first installed approximately 30 years ago by Pacific Bell Telephone Company (PacBell) in the western portion of the City. As the City continued to develop, City-owned twisted pair copper interconnect was installed intermittently with developments and capital improvements. The western portion of Chula Vista, between the I-5 and I-805, is the oldest part of the City and contains a minimal amount of City-owned twisted pair interconnect. The areas east of I-805 are newer and contain more City-owned twisted pair interconnect. All the existing copper wire based interconnect links operate on legacy Serial 1,200 bps analog modems and lack direct connections to the City’s TSCC, and thus require 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 357 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 9 utilization of leased line telephone drop communications. The existing network is obsolete and is incapable of supporting modern ITS technologies. 2.1.3 Serial Wireless Radio CommunicaƟons Several traffic signal locations in the City utilize Serial wireless radios for communications due to a lack of copper wire or fiber infrastructure to provide direct connection to the TSCC. Wireless radio communication is 900 MHZ Serial (EIA-232) digital, low bandwidth. Existing wireless radio interconnect locations are summarized in Table 2-2. Table 2-2 Existing Serial Wireless Radio Interconnect Locations STREET (NORTH/EAST) LIMIT (SOUTH/WEST) LIMIT Third Avenue (N) Moss Street (S) Naples Street Fourth Avenue (N) Anita Street (S) Montgomery School Crossing Quintard Street (E) Second Avenue (W) Third Avenue Hilltop Drive (N) Naples Street (S) Oxford Street 2.1.4 Cell Towers There are City-owned and privately-owned cell towers located throughout the City. The number and location were determined from shapefiles provided by the City’s GIS Department. The cell towers are not currently used for traffic-related systems. 2.2 Central Systems The City’s central systems are housed in City Hall and include: • Traffic Signal Communication Center (TSCC) • Traffic Management Center (TMC) • QuicNet 4+ Regional Arterial Management System (RAMS) • Sydney Coordinated Adaptive Traffic System (SCATS) As-built documentation was unavailable for several of the traffic systems housed within the City’s existing TSCC. Limited existing documentation was supplemented with on-site investigations. 2.2.1 Tra ffic Signal CommunicaƟons Center and Tra ffic Management Center The TSCC was constructed with City Hall in 2004 and quickly became a dual-purpose data center and Traffic Management Center (TMC). At 9 feet by 17 feet, the TSCC was not designed to be used as a TMC and over time, the room became congested and disorganized as new equipment and systems were installed2. TSCC equipment includes: • AT&T telephone service lines termination panel with multiple demarcation points. • 288-strand single-mode fiber optic cable line. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 358 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 10 • Splice enclosure rack mount. • Traffic signal test cabinet. • Two equipment racks housing analog modems. • Two Digi 16-port Serial communications servers. • QuicNet 4+ Server • SCATS Server • Battery back-up system. • Cisco 10 Base-T/100 Base-Tx Ethernet switch. • Type I enclosure breaker panel serving the existing TSCC room, IT room, and new TMC room. The City executed a design-build contract with STC Traffic to remodel the TSCC into a distinct data center and build a new TMC. The project was completed in early 2017. Figures 2-1 and 2-2 below show the TSCC and TMC before and after construction. Figure 2-1 TSCC Before and After Figure 2-2 TMC Before and After BEFORE AFTER BEFORE AFTER 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 359 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 11 2.2.2 Central Tra ffic Management System The City utilizes the QuicNet 4+ Regional Arterial Management Systems (RAMS) central control software for traffic management. Implemented in 2006, RAMS enables sharing of traffic signal operation information across jurisdictions in San Diego County through the QuicNet 4+ software application. Communications between agencies is accomplished over a T1 leased line and connectivity for the City is illustrated in Figure 2-3. The RAMS systems are currently being upgraded to Transparity as part of the system maintenance program. A new fiber optic line has been installed at the City’s TMC and communications will be 2 Mbps Ethernet over fiber when Transparity is active. Figure 2-3 RAMS Network 2.2.3 AdapƟve Signal Control The City of Chula Vista installed the Sydney Coordinated Adaptive Traffic System (SCATS) in May 2003. The system objectives include selecting cycle lengths, splits, and offsets to minimize stops during light demand, minimize delays during normal demand, and maximize throughput during heavy demand. The SCATS system includes twelve intersections along portions of East H Street and Otay Lakes Road3. The system runs on a dedicated server located in the TSCC. The server and user workstation are connected via a hub and 10/100 Base-T LAN. A 16-channel Serial interface unit communicates with the intersections through 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 360 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 12 data multiplexers and three low speed modems. Seven low speed channels from the 16-port Serial interface connect to the multiplexer located at Chula Vista City Hall. A composite signal from this multiplexer connects to a modem configured for 2400 bps synchronous operation. The voice frequency side of the modem connects with a changeover switch to the telephone drop cabinet third-party lease line at the East H Street and Southwestern College Entrance intersection and provides a composite signal to a multiplexer. The multiplexer decodes the seven low speed intersection signals and connects to the intersection modems and a changeover switches the communications line connections to the configuration required for SCATS4. Field elements include 2070 controllers with TransCore software and the modem and multiplexer equipment. System elements in the TSCC include a Windows NT operating system based PC server, SCATS intersection control software version 5, Serial interface hardware and software, modem and multiplexer equipment, an equipment rack, and a user work station. The SCATS network is shown in Figure 2-4. The SCATS system is no longer operational due to the SCATS server failure and a replacement adaptive traffic signal control system is currently being deployed. Figure 2-4 SCATS Network 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 361 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 13 2.3 Field Elements and Tra ffic OperaƟons The ITS communication and central systems previously described are utilized to manage and operate various connected devices in the field. These include traffic signal cabinets and controllers that operate timing and coordination, emergency vehicle preemption systems, grade crossing preemption, transit signal priority, and data acquisition systems. 2.3.1 Cabinets and Controllers The most common signal cabinet and current standard installation in the City is the type 332 controller cabinet. Most of the traffic signal controllers in Chula Vista are type 170 or Type 170E running 233 intersection control programs. As previously described in Section 2.2.3 there are 12 traffic signals that have custom-built 2070 controllers that run SCATS intersection control software version 5. 2.3.2 Tra ffic Signal Timing and CoordinaƟon Many traffic signals throughout the City run Time of Day (TOD) plans with coordination patterns typically scheduled during the morning, midday, and evening peak periods along arterials and secondary roadways. Table 2-3 contains a list of the 22 coordinated corridors in the City. The corridors are illustrated geographically on Figure 2-5. Table 2-3 Existing Coordinated Corridors STREET (NORTH/EAST) LIMIT (SOUTH/WEST) LIMIT Bonita Road (E) Billy Casper Way (W) Willow Street Broadway (N) C Street (S) H Street Broadway (N) H Street (S) Palomar Street E Street (E) Bonita Road (W) Woodlawn Avenue East H Street (E) Otay Lakes Road (W) Hidden Vista Drive Fifth Avenue (N) F Street (S) G Street Fourth Avenue (N) Brisbane St (S) Main Street H Street (E) Hilltop Dr (W) Broadway Hilltop Drive (N) I Street (S) J Street L Street (E) Nacion Avenue Broadway Main Street (E) I-805 (W) Industrial Blvd Main Street (E) Nirvana Avenue (W) I-805 Olympic Parkway (E) Eastlake Parkway (W) Heritage Road Orange Avenue (E) Max Avenue (W) Fourth Avenue Orange Avenue/Olympic Parkway (E) Brandywine Avenue (W) Melrose Avenue Otay Lakes Road (E) Lane Avenue (W) La Media Road Otay Lakes Road (N) Bonita Vista High School Drwy (S) East H Street 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 362 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 14 STREET (NORTH/EAST) LIMIT (SOUTH/WEST) LIMIT Otay Lakes Road (N) East H Street (S) Telegraph Canyon Road Palomar Street (E) Orange Avenue (W) Industrial Boulevard Palomar Street (E) Hilltop Drive (W) Fourth Avenue Telegraph Canyon Road (E) Otay Lakes Road (W) Canyon Plaza Driveway Third Avenue (N) H Street (S) Main Street 2.3.3 Grade Crossing PreempƟon The Blue Line Trolley route, operated by the San Diego Metropolitan Transit System (MTS) has 3 station stops in Chula Vista: Bayfront/ E Street, H Street, and Palomar Street. The Blue Line runs parallel to Industrial Blvd and there are 7 preempted traffic signals. The grade crossing preemption systems were recently upgraded to operate advance preemption and supervisory circuits. This preemption operation is more complex than traditional preemption operation and requires more complex controller programming and railroad to traffic signal interconnect. 2.3.4 Transit Signal Priority The South Bay Rapid project includes a 21-mile bus route that will run between the Otay Mesa Port of Entry and Downtown San Diego via National City and eastern Chula Vista. Eight stations in eastern Chula Vista and Otay Mesa, a Direct Access Ramp (DAR) on East Palomar Street at I-805, and a nearly six-mile dedicated transit lane in the median of East Palomar Street and along Eastlake Parkway are planned along the route. All phases of the South Bay Rapid project are currently in construction including 12 of the 15 total stations, arterial transit-only lanes on East Palomar Street, Transit Signal Priority (TSP), and enhanced customer amenities5. 2.3.5 Emergency Vehicle PreempƟon Emergency Vehicle Preemption (EVP) technology overrides typical traffic signal operations to provide priority for approaching emergency responder vehicles including firetrucks and ambulances. The typical emergency vehicle preemption build throughout Chula Vista includes an infrared-based system with varying models of Opticom phase selectors and infrared system emitters and detectors. Preemption devices throughout the City are typically older and range in age from 5 years to 15 years old. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 363 (###) (###) (###) (###) ### ### ### ### ### ñ !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$508 !"#$508 !"#$508 ·|}þ54·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 150 119 (103)30 (103)41 (114)59 (113)88(103)23 (103)17 (110)61 (105)39 (104)38 (111)63 (110)78 (104)37 (110)62 (122)265 (122)283 (122)285(122)288 (121)143 (117)286 (114)219 (103)281 (103)280 (113)260 (120)217 (120)213 (120)121 (117)105 (125)124 (125)142 (117)287 (124)221 (116)102 (120)112 (122)284 (122)282 (128)273 (121)264 (121)266 (121)267 (122)244 (122)237 (122)238 (122)259 (122)257(122)256(122)262(122)261 (122)251 (121)248 (121)247 (122)245 (122)243 (122)233 (122)252 (122)222 (128)258 (124)253 (121)250 (121)227 (103)254 (121)224 (121)225 (121)242 (121)241 (121)240 (121)239 (122)236(122)235 (128)234 (121)226 (124)223 (118)218 (120)216 (128)214 (118)170 (118)166 (118)174 (118)169 (118)172 (118)183(118)182 (124)179 (124)178 (124)152 (118)161 (118)153 (126)131 (126)129 (120)122 (116)101 (124)155 (128)177 (124)164 (128)181 (124)158 (120)120 (115)159 (118)199 (124)195 (128)202 (128)203 (124)211 (101)206 (122)207 (128)200 (128)204 (128)196 (116)193 (128)194 (128)186 (128)205 (124)191 (124)187 (124)208 (124)188 (124)184 (121)198 255115 117 113 114 116 118 173 135 128 (112)83(112)80 (113)68 (115)92 (106)29 (106)28 (109)57 (114)75 (114)73 (113)89 (117)94 (117)90 (117)91 (114)74 (109)31 (114)72 (113)71 (109)55 (108)54 (108)53 (105)24 (113)70 (114)76(109)58 (109)56 (105)26 (105)25 (106)27 (123)22 (113)69(108)52 (115)87 (109)51(105)40 (108)79 (108)49 (108)50 (123)20 (110)81 (108)84(108)82 (111)85 (102)11 (102)12 (110)77(102)13 (110)60(108)44(104)33(102)14 (123)15 (108)48 (108)47(104)36 (123)16 (123)21 (115)95 (111)86 (112)67 (112)66 (112)65 (123)19 (123)18 (108)46(104)35 (108)64 (104)34 (107)45 (107)43 (107)42 (118)96 (118)97 (118)98 (108)93 (116)99 (125)125 (117)278 (106)136 (117)104 (125)126 (117)103 (116)154 (103)146 (116)109 (125)127 (117)168 (116)110 (105)192 (107)149 (115)108 (121)107(121)106 (102)151 (124)271(124)270 (128)268 (128)269 (124)220 (125)228 (127)246(127)230 (127)229 (127)139 (118)165 (118)156 (118)163 (118)162 (118)141 (124)176 (124)175 (118)171 (118)147 (118)144 (126)132 (116)100 (126)140 (126)133 (127)167 (124)145 (124)148 (127)137 (124)157(124)123 (116)197 (128)201 (118)189 (118)190 (128)185 E H ST E J ST MAIN ST I ST OLYMPIC PYH ST03RD AV J ST E ST L ST F ST BAY BLOTAYLAKESRD HUNTEPYBROADWAYK ST E PALOMAR S THILLTOP DR D ST 01ST AV MOSS ST LA MEDIA RDPALOMAR ST05TH AV NAPLES ST TELEGRA P H C A N Y O N RD ANITA ST 02ND AV E L ST E NAPLES S T ORANGE AV G ST C ST HERI TA G E R D LANEAVP R OCTORVALLEYRD PASEO L ADERAB O N IT A RDCLUBH O U S E D R E I ST E OXFORD S T FLOWER ST S RANCHO D E L R E Y PY N R A NCHODELREYPY WUE STERDN 0 2 N D A VN G REEN S V IEWD R E X P L O RATIONFALLSDR PROCTOR VALLEY RD BAY BL E H ST W U E S T E R D02ND AV C ST G ST 05TH AVI ST K ST FLOWER S T 01ST AVHERITAGE RD ANITA STANITA ST WUESTE RDSAN DIEGO S.D. COUNTY CORONADO NATIONAL CITY SAN DIEGO IMPERIAL BEACH S.D. COUNTY LANDFILL S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY (121)263 (128)215 (124)160 (128)209 (106)32 (109)279 (126)130 (126)111 (124)134 (127)138 04TH AVEASTLAKE PY EAS T L A K E P Y BIRCH RD INDUSTR IAL BLBRANDYWINE AVBONITA RDMT M I G U E L R D E ORANG E A V PASEO RANCHEROPASEO DEL REYMEDICAL CENTER DRCREST DRSAN MIGUEL RANCH RD N 04TH AVTIERRA DEL REYE F L O W E R S T E PALOMAR D R ARTISAN ST 03RD AVE 07TH STE NAPLES CT MAIN STMAIN ST 03RD AV HERITAGE RD Figure 2-5 Existing Coordinated Corridors Legend ###System Control Number (###)Communication Number !(Coordinated City Signal !(Non-Coordinated City Signal !(City-Caltrans Coordinated Signal !(Caltrans Traffic Signal City of Chula Vista ñ City Hall Existing Coordinated Corridors BONITA RD BROADWAY E STREET EAST H STREET FIFTH AVE FOURTH AVE H STREET HILLTOP DR L STREET MAIN STREET OLYMPIC PKWY ORANGE AVE ORANGE AVE/OLYMPIC PKWY OTAY LAKES RD PALOMAR ST TELEGRAPH CANYON RD THIRD AVE 0 0.5 10.25 Miles Document Path: S:\Projects\Chula Vista\0347_Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan\04 Design\GIS\MXD Files\Chula Vista Comm MP (10.3).mxd/ 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 364 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 16 2.3.6 Data AcquisiƟon Systems Traffic operations are monitored by City staff regularly and assessed annually by the City’s Growth Management Oversight Commission (GMOC). Data acquisition systems including a small number of Traffic Measurement Devices and are utilized to provide real-time and historical traffic data. Accurate data is imperative to analyzing operational efficiencies and ensuring traffic threshold standards are met. 2.3.6.1 Traffic Measurement Devices The City of Chula Vista’s Growth Management Program seeks to maintain quality of life by monitoring threshold standards for various public facilities and service through the City’s Traffic Monitoring Program (TMP). Traffic thresholds are monitored for Arterial Level of Service (ALOS) and Urban Street Level of Service (ULOS) standards. To acquire necessary traffic data for monitoring and assessment purposes, traffic measurement devices including volume data collection and speed monitoring systems are located throughout Chula Vista. Remote Traffic Microwave Sensors (RTMS) are located at 28 permanent count stations Citywide. 18 in-pavement wireless Sensys detectors are located along Olympic Parkway, East H Street, and Telegraph Canyon Road for arterial travel time (ATT) volume, occupancy, and speed (VOS) data and bicycle activity. Table 2-4 below summarizes traffic measurement device locations by type. Communications to the City’s TSCC is accomplished through a third-party owned cellular network using older 2G technology and data is hosted by an outside party server. Maintenance and operation of the system is increasingly expensive and expansion is cost prohibitive. The system is becoming obsolete and more modern and affordable systems are available on the market. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 365 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 17 Table 2-4 Traffic Measurement Devices Location Summary RTMS SENSYS STREET LOCATION STREET LOCATION Birch Rd East of Eastlake Pkwy Birch Rd Magdalena Birch Rd Between Magdalena Ave and SR 125 East H St Paso Del Rey Eastlake Pkwy North of Olympic Pkwy East H St Del Rey Blvd Eastlake Pkwy Between Olympic Pkwy and Birch Rd East H St Terra Nova Dr Eastlake Pkwy South of Clubhouse East H St Hidden Valley Eastlake Pkwy Between Otay Lakes Rd and Greensgate Dr Olympic Pkwy Heritage Rd Exploration Falls South of Olympic Pkwy Olympic Pkwy Brandywine Ave Hunte Pkwy North of Otay Lakes Rd Olympic Pkwy Concord Wy Hunte Pkwy Between Otay Lakes Rd and Greesview Olympic Pkwy Oleander Ave Hunte Pkwy Between S Greesview and Olympic Pkwy Otay Lakes Rd Rutgers Ave Hunte Pkwy Between Olympic Pkwy and Evening Star Telegraph Canyon Rd La Medina Rd Hunte Pkwy East of Eastlake Pkwy Telegraph Canyon Rd Buena Vista La Media Rd Between Olympic Pkwy and Birch Rd Telegraph Canyon Rd Paseo Ranchero La Media Rd South of Olympic Pkwy Telegraph Canyon Rd Paseo Ladera Lane Ave Between Mackenzie Creek and Otay Lakes Rd Telegraph Canyon Rd Medical Center Magdalena Ave South of Birch Rd Telegraph Canyon Rd Paseo Del Rey Magdalena Ave North of Birch Rd Telegraph Canyon Rd Oleander Olympic Pkwy Between Hunte Pkwy and Olympic Vista Telegraph Canyon Rd Canyon Plaza Ctr Olympic Pkwy West of Hunte Pkwy Olympic Pkwy East of La Media Otay Lakes Rd Between Hunte Pkwy and Woods Otay Lakes Rd Between Woods and Wueste Rd Otay Lakes Rd Between Eastlake Pkwy and Lane Ave Otay Lakes Rd Between Lane Ave and Hunte Pkwy East Palomar St South of Olympic Pkwy Proctor Valley Rd Between Duncan Ranch Rd and Agua Vista Winding Walk Between Olympic Pkwy and Evening Star Wueste Rd Between Otay Lakes Rd and Olympic Pkwy 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 366 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 18 2.4 Tra ffic OperaƟons Staff The most important resource of the City traffic system are the people who manage, operate, and maintain it. Chula Vista employs staff dedicated to the operation and maintenance of the City’s traffic system including the Traffic Engineering Section and Traffic Operations Group. Staffing organization is illustrated in Figure 2-6 and discussed in the following subsections. Figure 2-6 Traffic Systems Staff Organization Chart CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SECTION 1 Senior Civil Engineer 2 Associate Engineers 1 Senior Engineering Tech 1 Engineering Tech II TRAFFIC OPERATIONS GROUP 1 Traffic Devices Supervisor 3 Traffic Devices Technicians TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SECTION 1 Senior Civil Engineer 2 Associate Engineers 1 Senior Engineering Tech 1 Engineering Tech II TRAFFIC OPERATIONS GROUP 1 Traffic Devices Supervisor 3 Traffic Devices Technicians CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SECTION 1 Senior Civil Engineer 2 Associate Engineers 1 Senior Engineering Tech 1 Engineering Tech II TRAFFIC OPERATIONS GROUP 1 Traffic Devices Supervisor 3 Traffic Devices Technicians 2.4.1 Tra ffic Engineering SecƟon The Traffic Engineering Section is part of the City’s Department of Engineering and Capital Projects. Traffic engineering and operations staff report to the City Traffic Engineer. Traffic Engineering section responsibilities include6: • Development, monitoring, and implementation of traffic improvements in the City. • Assist on all developments and review construction area traffic control plans. • Perform field surveys of high accident and high congestion locations. • Investigate requests from the public, City Council, City Manager, Mayor, and/or community groups for traffic improvements, and initiate remedial and corrective traffic improvements. • Address traffic safety issues in cooperation with the Chula Vista Police Department. • Serve as communication link between residents, City staff, and City Council via the Safety Commission. • Involvement in the Neighborhood Traffic and Pedestrian Safety Program to improve safety for pedestrians, bicyclists, and motoring public within Chula Vista. • Coordinate with regional agencies including SANDAG, MTS, Caltrans, and the Port of San Diego. • Develop, monitor, and implement traffic signal timing. • TMC operation. • Operation and management of the traffic signal communications network. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 367 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 19 2.4.2 Tra ffic Signal Maintenance Group Traffic systems maintenance is provided by the Traffic Operations Section under the City’s Engineering and Capital Projects Department. Traffic device technicians perform annual preventative maintenance and repairs on both emergency and as-needed basis for traffic signal systems and street lights throughout Chula Vista7. Traffic operations staff report to the City Traffic Engineer. 2.5 CommunicaƟons System Topology and Architecture The traffic systems research and documentation were documented in a Geographic Information System (GIS) database and presented graphically with a corresponding map. ESRI software ArcMap 10.2.2 was utilized and a dynamic layer set with attribute tables were created and include all inventory information researched for inclusion. Shapefiles for traffic signals, conduit, and cellular towers were provided by the City’s GIS department. Existing attribute tables for the shapefiles were supplemented with information obtained from digitized improvement plans and additional City-provided documentation. Table 2-5 summarizes the dynamic layers and inventory information. Examples of the GIS attribute tables that correspond with the dynamic layers are provided in Figures 2-7 through 2-10. Table 2-5 Summary of Inventory Information for Existing Conditions Dynamic Layer Set DYNAMIC LAYER INVENTORY INFORMATION Telephone Drop Traffic Signals Intersection, SCN, Communication Number, Drop Number Offline Telephone Drop Traffic Signals Intersection, SCN, Communication Number, Drop Number Adaptive Traffic Signals Intersection, System Type Existing Traffic Signals Intersection, Operation, Status, SCN, Communication Number, Drop Number, Drawing Number, Signal Modification Date Existing Caltrans Traffic Signals Intersection Traffic Measurement Device Street, Location Description, Type, IP Address, Download Date, 7.4.2, AP, Repeater, Cards, TT, VOS, Bike, Controller Location, Bike Lane Designation, Bike Detection Cards, Bike Detection Sensors City-Owned Wireless Towers Own Status, CA SENO, Applicant, Project Type, Global ID Private Wireless Towers Own Status, CA SENO, Applicant, Project Type, Global ID Existing Copper Street, Interconnect Type, Conduit Size, As-Built Date Existing Wireless Traffic Interconnect Street, Intersection, Communication Type, Brand, Activity Existing Fiber Street, Interconnect Type, Conduit Size, As-Built Date, # of Fibers Existing Empty Conduit Street, Conduit Size, As-Built Date MTS Fiber Interconnect Type, Conduit Size Caltrans Fiber Interconnect Type, Conduit Size 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 368 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 20 DYNAMIC LAYER INVENTORY INFORMATION Port of San Diego Fiber Interconnect Type, Conduit Size City of San Diego Fiber Interconnect Type, Maintenance Date 2.5.1 ExisƟng Tra ffic Systems Topology A Geographic Information System (GIS) database and map was created detailing specifics of communication systems build and location. The resulting map illustrates the topology of traffic systems in the City. Existing traffic systems conditions are mapped on Figure 2-11 and a full size 24x36 fold out plan is provided in Appendix A. 2.5.2 ExisƟng Tra ffic Systems CommunicaƟons Architecture The existing traffic systems communications network is based on low speed multi-drop Serial communications technology over various communications mediums and is comprised of: • Traffic Signal Communications Center located at Chula Vista City Hall. • Single-mode fiber optic lines based digital multi-drop network. • City-owned copper wire based analog multi-drop network. • Leased line analog multi-drop network. • Serial wireless radio communications network. The primary communications system, for approximately 90% of the traffic signals in the City of Chula Vista, is based upon 3rd party leased telephone lines. Table 2-6 provides a summary of the traffic signals by communication type. A schematic detailing the City of Chula Vista’s existing traffic systems communications architecture is provided in Appendix B as a full size 24x36 fold out plan. Table 2-6 Existing Traffic Signal Communications Summary COMMUNICATION TYPE DESCRIPTION # OF INTERSECTIONS Fiber Optic Cable Single-mode fiber optic cable Ring 1: IFS fiber modems Ring 2: VLINK fiber modems Ring 3: VLINK fiber modems 24 4 14 6 Leased Copper Lines Analog modems 91 City-Owned Copper Plant to Leased Copper Lines Analog multi-drop modems SCATS adaptive traffic signals 123 12 Wireless Interconnect Serial wireless radio connections 4 Offline Communications Infrastructure Gap Telephone Drop Repair Needed 11 2 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 369 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 21 Figure 2-7 Existing Traffic Signals Attribute Table Figure 2-8 Existing Copper Interconnect Cable Attribute Table 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 370 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 22 Figure 2-9 Existing Fiber Optic Cable Attribute Table Figure 2-10 Existing Wireless Traffic Interconnect Attribute Table 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 371 (###) (###) (###) (###) ### ### ### ### ### # # # # # # # # ## # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # ## # # # # # # # # ## # # # ### # # # # # # #### # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # ##### # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # ## # # #### # # # ## # ## # # # # # # # # # ## ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç !!!!!!!ñ XY XY XY XY XY XYXY XYXY XY XY XY XY XY XY XY XY XYXY XY XY XY XY XY XYXY XY XY XY XYXYXY XY XYXYXY XY XY XY XY XYXY XYXYXY XY !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( ") ") ")") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ")") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ")") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ")") ") ") ") ") ") ")") ") ") ")") ") ") #* #* #*#*#*#*#*#* #*#* #* #* ") ") !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$508 !"#$508 !"#$508 ·|}þ54·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 E H ST E J ST MAIN ST 04TH AVI ST OLYMPIC PYH ST03RD AV J ST E ST L ST F ST BAY BLOTAYLAKESRD HUNTE PYBROADWAYK ST E PALOMAR S THILLTOP DR D ST 01ST AV MOSS ST LAMEDI ARD PALOMAR ST05TH AV NAPLES ST TE L E GRAPH CA NYONRD ANITA ST 02ND AV E L ST E NAPLES S T ORANGE AV G ST C ST HERI T A G E R DLANEAVP R O C TORVALLEYRD PA S EOLADERA B O N IT A RDCLUB H O U S E D R E I ST EORA N G E A VE OXFORD S T FLOWER S T S RANCHO D E L R E Y PY N R A NCHODELREYPY PASEO D E LREYWUE STERDN 0 2 N D A VN G REEN S V IEWD R E X P L O RATIONFALLSDRCREST DRE F L O W E R S T E PALOMAR D R 01ST AV E H ST W U E S T E R D02ND AV K ST G ST 05TH AVI ST PROCTOR VALLEY RD BAY BL C ST ANITA STANITA ST HERITAGE RDWUESTE RDSAN DIEGO S.D. COUNTY CORONADO NATIONAL CITY SAN DIEGO IMPERIAL BEACH S.D. COUNTY LANDFILL S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY 255115 117 113 114 116 118 173 135 150 128 (112)83(112)80 (113)68 (106)28 (114)73 (113)89 (103)41 (117)94 (117)90 (117)91 (109)31 (114)72 (113)71 (109)55 (108)54 (108)53 (105)24 (113)70 (109)58 (109)56 (106)32 (105)26 (105)25 (106)27 (123)22 (103)23 (113)69(108)52 (109)51(105)40 (108)79 (103)17 (108)49 (108)50(105)39 (104)38(123)20 (110)81 (108)84(108)82 (111)63 (111)85 (102)11 (102)12 (110)77(102)13 (110)78 (108)44(104)33 (123)15 (104)37 (108)48 (108)47(104)36 (123)16 (123)21 (111)86 (112)67 (112)66 (112)65 (123)19 (123)18 (108)46(104)35 (108)64 (104)34 (107)45 (107)43 (118)98 (108)93 (116)99 (125)125 (121)143 (117)286 (114)219 (103)281 (103)280 (117)278 (113)260 (120)217 (120)213 (106)136 (120)121 (117)104 (125)126 (117)105 (117)103 (116)154 (103)146 (125)127 (117)168 (116)110 (125)124 (105)192 (107)149 (115)108 (121)107 (125)142 (117)287 (124)221 (116)102 (120)112 (122)284 (121)263 (121)266 (121)267 (122)244 (124)271(124)270 (128)268 (128)269 (122)259 (122)257(122)256(122)262(122)261 (122)251 (121)248 (121)247 (122)245 (122)243 (122)233 (122)222 (124)253 (124)220 (121)250 (125)228 (103)254 (127)246 (121)224 (121)225 (121)241 (121)240 (121)239 (122)236(122)235 (128)234 (127)229 (121)226 (124)223 (118)218 (120)216 (128)214 (127)139 (118)165 (118)170 (118)174 (118)163 (118)162 (118)141 (118)169 (118)172 (118)183(118)182 (124)179 (124)178 (124)152 (118)171 (118)161 (118)153 (118)147 (118)144 (126)132 (126)131 (126)129 (116)100 (116)101 (126)140 (126)133 (127)167 (128)177 (124)164 (124)145 (128)181 (124)148 (127)138 (127)137 (124)158 (124)157(124)123(120)120 (115)159 (118)199 (116)197 (124)195 (128)202 (128)203 (128)201 (118)189 (124)211 (101)206(118)190 (128)200 (128)185 (128)204 (128)196 (116)193 (128)194 (128)186 (128)205 (124)191 (124)187 (124)208 (124)188 (124)184 EASTLAKE PY EAS T L A K E P Y BIRCH RD INDUSTR IAL BLBRANDYWINE AVBONITA R D MT M I G U E L R D FLOWER ST PASEO RANCHEROMEDICAL CENTER DRSAN MIGUEL RANCH RD N 04TH AVTIERRA DEL REYARTISAN ST 03RD AVE 07TH STE NAPLES CT HERITAGE RD MAIN STMAIN ST 03RD AV 119 (115)92 (106)29 (109)57(103)30 (114)75 (114)74 (114)76 (114)59 (113)88 (115)87 (110)61 (110)60 (102)14 (115)95 (110)62 (107)42 (118)96 (118)97 (122)265 (122)283 (122)285(122)288 (109)279 (116)109 (121)106 (102)151 (122)282 (128)273 (121)264 (122)237 (122)238 (122)252 (128)258 (121)227 (128)215 (121)242 (127)230 (118)156 (118)166 (124)176 (124)175 (126)130 (120)122 (126)111 (124)155 (124)134 (124)160 (122)207 (128)209 (121)198 Figure 2-11 Existing Traffic Systems Communications Network Legend ###System Control Number (###)Communication Number ")Offline Telephone Drop Traffic Signals ")Telephone Drop Traffic Signals #*Existing Adaptive Traffic Signals !(Existing Traffic Signal !(Offline Existing Traffic Signal !(Caltrans Traffic Signal XY Traffic Measurement Device #Ç City-Owned Wireless Towers #Private Wireless Towers Existing Copper ! !Existing Wireless Traffic Interconnect Existing Fiber Existing Empty Conduit City of San Diego Fiber MTS Fiber Caltrans Fiber Port of San Diego Fiber City of Chula Vista ñ City Hall 0 0.5 10.25 Miles Document Path: S:\Projects\Chula Vista\0347_Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan\04 Design\GIS\MXD Files\Chula Vista Comm MP (10.3).mxd/ 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 372 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 24 2.5.3 Regional CommunicaƟons Infrastructure Existing communications facilities for regional agencies including the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG), San Diego Metropolitan Transit System (MTS), California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) District 11, and the Port of San Diego were obtained from the regional Fiber Working Group (FWG) documentation. Existing and future Port of San Diego fiber locations were researched from the Bayfront Master Plan. The Port of San Diego is currently developing a fiber master plan that will complete a fiber optic ring around the San Diego Bay area. The architecture is built based on a core ring concept that will provide high-speed network entry points for the entire area. SANDAG is upgrading the RAMS system connectivity between each agency in the region to a new fiber optic lease connection with 2 Mbps speed. Fiber optic communications routes for each regional agency is mapped on the Master Plan map and assigned to separate unique dynamic layers within the GIS geodatabase. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 373 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 25 3 Needs Assessment The traffic systems communications needs assessment is based on two primary criteria: existing system deficiencies that require more immediate attention and the needs of the long-term future transportation network. Existing system deficiencies and needs have been identified through an extensive review of the existing conditions including the traffic communications system, central systems, ITS elements, and traffic operations. The City’s future transportation network was researched to identify the new infrastructure needs and subsequently prioritize opportunities to improve the traffic communication system. New roads and traffic signals provide opportunities to expand, modernize, or build new communications system technology and infrastructure that meet both immediate and future needs. The communications system needs include considerations for speed, bandwidth, reliability, redundancy, networking capabilities, gaps in communication due to infrastructure and/ or media deficiencies, and new locations requiring service. The following sections present the existing system deficiency identification and future roadway network assessment. 3.1 Stakeholder Outreach Outreach and coordination meetings were conducted with several other City departments to acquire additional information and documentation on existing and future traffic systems in the City. The City’s Geographic Information System (GIS) Department provided relevant GIS shapefiles and information. The Information Technology (IT) Department provided information on communications connectivity within the City’s Traffic Signal Communications Center (TSCC) and existing and future system support requirements. Staff from the City’s Development Services Department and Economic Development Department provided documentation and information for both in-construction and future improvement projects and master plans throughout the City that will affect traffic systems in Chula Vista. Additionally, SANDAG’s 2050 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) Revenue Constrained Plan for Arterial Projects was researched. 3.2 Deficiency IdenƟficaƟon Communications deficiencies have been identified for traffic communications, central systems, field elements, and traffic operations based upon analysis of the existing communications systems conditions. Existing communications media and protocols, both City-owned and leased, currently limit the City’s ability to monitor and manage traffic systems in real-time. Deficiencies and needs were identified based on the capabilities of the existing elements and the functionality necessary to efficiently and effectively operate the various systems and operations. 3.2.1 Tra ffic CommunicaƟons System Deficiencies Communications system deficiencies were identified and are listed as follows. • Existing single-mode fiber optic network utilizes low speed (1,200 bps) Serial communications. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 374 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 26 • Existing wireless radio communications are Serial and have low bandwidth capabilities. • Extensive gaps in City-owned communication infrastructure due to missing physical connections centrally and/ or locally. Only 24 of the City’s 267 existing traffic signals have a physical link to the TSCC. • Leased communications are costly, reliant on the third-party owner for communications repairs, and have limited communications capabilities such as low-speeds, low-bandwidth, and are analog-based. Approximately 90% of the City’s existing traffic signals communicate on leased lines, limiting the entire traffic signal communications network to analog. • Operation and maintenance costs for the existing leased line telecommunications network is expensive, currently costing the City approximately $75,000 per year, and incapable for supporting existing and future traffic systems and ITS applications. • Two traffic signals are offline and unable to communicate with the City’s TSCC through leased line communications due to the third-party owner’s inability to make adequate repairs to the network. • Video detection feeds are unable to be viewed remotely due to physical gaps in communication infrastructure to the TSCC and bandwidth limitations associated with leased line communications and/ or Serial wireless radio communications. • Existing traffic signal communications system bandwidth is unable to accommodate current and future high bandwidth required by ITS applications such as real-time video monitoring of the traffic on the city streets. • Modern devices with desired capabilities do not support the legacy communication protocols. 3.2.2 Central Systems Deficiencies The City remodeled and built a new TSCC data center and Traffic Management Center through a separate design-build task with STC Traffic. The project was completed in early 2017 and resolved the primary central systems deficiencies. Remaining central system deficiencies were identified as follows. • The QuicNet4+ Regional Arterial Management System (RAMS) currently utilized is outdated and does not offer the functionality provided in modern systems that are becoming industry standard. It is also unable to communicate with Advanced Traffic Controllers (ATC). • The Sydney Coordinated Adaptive Traffic System (SCATS) is outdated and subject to down time due to the legacy protocols, low-speed (1,200 bps) connection, and bandwidth limitations associated with leased line communications. The SCATS system is no longer operational. The two remaining central system deficiencies are being resolved through implementation of two new state-of-the-art systems in 2017, (1) a new Transparity RAMS system and (2) a new central traffic management system (ATMS.now) and SynchroGreen™ Adaptive Traffic Control System (ATCS). 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 375 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 27 3.2.3 Field Elements and Tra ffic OperaƟons Deficiencies The City uses multiple systems and strategies to manage traffic operations throughout Chula Vista including traffic signal timing and coordination, grade crossing preemption, emergency vehicle preemption, transit signal priority, and data acquisition. Each system has been reviewed and deficiencies identified include: • There are 22 existing coordinated corridors throughout the City. Many have inconsistent coordination plans. This is a symptom of a lack of reliable communications to traffic signals to monitor and verify that signal timing is as designed and TOD plans are providing efficient and effective traffic progression. • Type 170 controllers are outdated and do not provide modern communication protocols or functionality required to perform advanced traffic operations. • Emergency Vehicle Preemption equipment is antiquated (up to 15 years old), Infrared-based, relies on line-of-sight, and is susceptible to illegal emitters. Unauthorized preemption drastically impacts coordinated corridors, as recovery can take a significant amount of time, causing unnecessary impacts to traffic signal operations on critical corridors throughout Chula Vista. • Traffic measurement devices currently communicate through a third-party owned cellular network and the traffic data is hosted through an outside party server. • Traffic signals lack stand-alone battery back-up units for emergency power during power outages. • Field elements lack the ability to communicate with the element, view the element status, and remotely manage and control the element. • City staff does not have the communication system necessary to monitor and control traffic in real time through video and data acquisition. 3.2.4 CommunicaƟons Gap IdenƟficaƟon Gaps in communications infrastructure were identified through analysis of the Master Plan GIS map, which geographically presents the existing traffic systems. Although the City currently has established communications to approximately 95% of the 267 existing traffic signals, only 9% are communicating on City-owned infrastructure and the remaining traffic signals communicate via leased lines. The high operating and maintenance costs associated with these leased lines, as well as the limited communication capabilities due to obsolete technology, makes the existing communications network an impractical and unsustainable model for the City of Chula Vista’s existing and future transportation system needs. Communications gap identification includes considerations for gaps between traffic signals locally and gaps between traffic signals and the TMC. Based on the existing communications system in Chula Vista, gaps were categorized as follows: • Gaps due to lack of infrastructure. • Gaps due to leased infrastructure. • Gaps due to combination of leased and City-owned infrastructure. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 376 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 28 3.2.4.1 Infrastructure Gaps Gaps due to a lack of infrastructure include signalized locations with no existing City-owned or leased communications infrastructure. There are 13 offline traffic signals in the City that cannot be monitored remotely from the TMC and City staff must be dispatched to verify signal operations in the field. This is an inefficient use of both City time and resources. Of the 13 offline traffic signals, 11 are caused by gaps in communication infrastructure and 2 are leased infrastructure locations that require repairs. 3.2.4.2 Leased Gaps Gaps due to leased infrastructure include signalized intersections that communicate with the TMC through a third-party owned POTS leased network. There are 102 telephone drop traffic signals, including 11 SCATS signals, in the City with the majority located in the downtown area between I-5 and I-805. 3.2.4.3 Combination Infrastructure and Leased Gaps Communications gaps that are caused by a combination of leased and City-owned infrastructure include traffic signals that are interconnected by City-owned twisted pair copper wire to a traffic signal communicating on leased lines. These signals are currently connected to telephone drops due to a lack of a direct communications link to the City’s TMC. There are 124 traffic signals, including 1 SCATS signal, on the City-owned copper wire based analog multi-drop network. Table 3-1 provides a summary of the traffic signal communication system deficiencies and Figure 3-1 presents the City’s communications gaps1. Table 3-1 Traffic Signal Communications Infrastructure and Deficiencies Summary Number DESCRIPTION QUANTITY - City of Chula Vista Total 267 1 Analog Fiber Optic Communication 24 2 Serial Wireless Radio Communication 4 3 Leased Copper-Based Communication 102 4 City-Owned Infrastructure on Leased Copper-Based Communication 124 5 No Communication Due to Infrastructure Gap 11 6 No Communication Due to Leased Infrastructure Repair 2 7 Analog Video Detection 155 8 Lack of Remote CCTV Monitoring 267 9 Lack of Limited Service and/or Post-Preemption Sequence 5 10 IR-Based Emergency Vehicle Preemption 267 11 Leased Cellular-Based Communications 46* 12 Type 170 Controllers 255 13 Lack of Stand-Alone Battery Back-Up 267 *Traffic Measurement Devices are located nearby signalized intersections 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page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ñ !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( ") ") ")") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ")") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ")") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ")") ") ") ") ") ") ")") ") ") ")") ") ") !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$508 !"#$508 !"#$508 ·|}þ54·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 E H ST E J ST MAIN ST 04TH AVI ST OLYMPIC PYH ST03RD AV J ST E ST L ST F ST BAY BLOTAYLAKESRD HUNTE PYBROADWAYK ST E PALOMAR S THILLTOP DR D ST 01ST AV MOSS ST LAMEDI ARD PALOMAR ST05TH AV NAPLES ST TE L E GRAPH CA NYONRD ANITA ST 02ND AV E L ST E NAPLES S T ORANGE AV G ST C ST HERI T A G E R DLANEAVP R O C TORVALLEYRD PA S EOLADERA B O N IT A RDCLUB H O U S E D R E I ST EORA N G E A VE OXFORD S T FLOWER S T S RANCHO D E L R E Y PY N R A NCHODELREYPY PASEO D E LREYWUE STERDN 0 2 N D A VN G REEN S V IEWD R E X P L O RATIONFALLSDRCREST DRE F L O W E R S T E PALOMAR D R 01ST AV E H ST W U E S T E R D02ND AV K ST G ST 05TH AVI ST PROCTOR VALLEY RD BAY BL C ST ANITA STANITA ST HERITAGE RDWUESTE RDSAN DIEGO S.D. COUNTY CORONADO NATIONAL CITY SAN DIEGO IMPERIAL BEACH S.D. COUNTY LANDFILL S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY 255115 117 113 114 116 118 173 135 150 128 (112)83(112)80 (113)68 (106)28 (114)73 (113)89 (103)41 (117)94 (117)90 (117)91 (109)31 (114)72 (113)71 (109)55 (108)54 (108)53 (105)24 (113)70 (109)58 (109)56 (106)32 (105)26 (105)25 (106)27 (123)22 (103)23 (113)69(108)52 (109)51(105)40 (108)79 (103)17 (108)49 (108)50(105)39 (104)38(123)20 (110)81 (108)84(108)82 (111)63 (111)85 (102)11 (102)12 (110)77(102)13 (110)78 (108)44(104)33 (123)15 (104)37 (108)48 (108)47(104)36 (123)16 (123)21 (111)86 (112)67 (112)66 (112)65 (123)19 (123)18 (108)46(104)35 (108)64 (104)34 (107)45 (107)43 (118)98 (108)93 (116)99 (125)125 (121)143 (117)286 (114)219 (103)281 (103)280 (117)278 (113)260 (120)217 (120)213 (106)136 (120)121 (117)104 (125)126 (117)105 (117)103 (116)154 (103)146 (125)127 (117)168 (116)110 (125)124 (105)192 (107)149 (115)108 (121)107 (125)142 (117)287 (124)221 (116)102 (120)112 (122)284 (121)263 (121)266 (121)267 (122)244 (124)271(124)270 (128)268 (128)269 (122)259 (122)257(122)256(122)262(122)261 (122)251 (121)248 (121)247 (122)245 (122)243 (122)233 (122)222 (124)253 (124)220 (121)250 (125)228 (103)254 (127)246 (121)224 (121)225 (121)241 (121)240 (121)239 (122)236(122)235 (128)234 (127)229 (121)226 (124)223 (118)218 (120)216 (128)214 (127)139 (118)165 (118)170 (118)174 (118)163 (118)162 (118)141 (118)169 (118)172 (118)183(118)182 (124)179 (124)178 (124)152 (118)171 (118)161 (118)153 (118)147 (118)144 (126)132 (126)131 (126)129 (116)100 (116)101 (126)140 (126)133 (127)167 (128)177 (124)164 (124)145 (128)181 (124)148 (127)138 (127)137 (124)158 (124)157(124)123(120)120 (115)159 (118)199 (116)197 (124)195 (128)202 (128)203 (128)201 (118)189 (124)211 (101)206(118)190 (128)200 (128)185 (128)204 (128)196 (116)193 (128)194 (128)186 (128)205 (124)191 (124)187 (124)208 (124)188 (124)184 EASTLAKE PY EAS T L A K E P Y BIRCH RD INDUSTR IAL BLBRANDYWINE AVBONITA R D MT M I G U E L R D FLOWER ST PASEO RANCHEROMEDICAL CENTER DRSAN MIGUEL RANCH RD N 04TH AVTIERRA DEL REYARTISAN ST 03RD AVE 07TH STE NAPLES CT HERITAGE RD MAIN STMAIN ST 03RD AV 119 (115)92 (106)29 (109)57(103)30 (114)75 (114)74 (114)76 (114)59 (113)88 (115)87 (110)61 (110)60 (102)14 (115)95 (110)62 (107)42 (118)96 (118)97 (122)265 (122)283 (122)285(122)288 (109)279 (116)109 (121)106 (102)151 (122)282 (128)273 (121)264 (122)237 (122)238 (122)252 (128)258 (121)227 (128)215 (121)242 (127)230 (118)156 (118)166 (124)176 (124)175 (126)130 (120)122 (126)111 (124)155 (124)134 (124)160 (122)207 (128)209 (121)198 Figure 3-1 Communication Gaps Legend ###System Control Number (###)Communication Number !(Communication Infrastructure Gap ")Signal - Leased Infrastructure !(Signal - City Infrastructure !(Signal - No Infrastructure XY TMD - Leased Infrastructure Existing Copper Existing Fiber ! !Existing Wireless Traffic Interconnect Future Fiber Primary Fiber Optic Ring Infrastructure Gap City of Chula Vista ñ City Hall 0 0.5 10.25 Miles Document Path: S:\Projects\Chula Vista\0347_Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan\04 Design\GIS\MXD Files\Chula Vista Comm MP Phase Implementation.mxd/ 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 378 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 30 3.3 Future Roadway Projects Relevant information for future roadway projects throughout Chula Vista was researched in documentation provided by the City’s Public Works, Engineering and Development Services Departments. The documents provided information on new traffic signals, new roadways, and planned roadway widenings. The documents researched include: • Otay Ranch Villages Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plans. • University Villages Project Environmental Impact Report (EIR). • Bayfront Master Plan. • Chula Vista Main Street Streetscape Master Plan. • Urban Core Specific Plan. The City of Chula Vista General Plan organizes the City into a hierarchy of geographic areas for policy purposes. From the largest to the smallest, the areas include: Planning Area, Subarea, District, and Focus Area. Chula Vista’s four Planning Areas are: Bayfront, Northwest, Southwest, and East. Each planning area has an Area Plan that is incorporated into the Land Use and Transportation Element. Research was conducted for planned projects that would impact Chula Vista’s future roadway network. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 379 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 31 3.3.1 Future Tra ffic Signals Research of the above documentation identified 96 traffic signals that are planned for future construction. The future traffic signals were documented on a dynamic layer in GIS with the attribute table detailing the intersection location. The following are the developments associated with the future traffic signals. • The Chula Vista Bayfront Master Plan (CVMBP) is a joint master plan by the Port of San Diego, City of Chula Vista, and Pacifica Companies to develop a 500-plus acre public area along the San Diego Bay. Seven new traffic signals will be installed in the Bayfront area2. • The Chula Vista Main Street Streetscape Master Plan develops a Complete Street plan for Main Street between Industrial Boulevard and the I-805. The roadway plan identifies 6 new signalized intersections along Main Street between Jacqua Street and Otay Valley Road/ Maple Drive3. • The Eastern area of the City has developed thousands of acres of formerly undeveloped land since the mid-1970s. The area comprises six master planned communities including: Sunbow, Rancho del Rey, Eastlake, Rolling Hills Ranch, San Miguel Ranch, and Otay Ranch. Five of the six communities are either built-out or nearing completion. Otay Ranch is in the development process and is the largest master planned community in Chula Vista with 83 planned new traffic signals4. 3.3.2 Future Tra ffic CommunicaƟons Systems The City plans to construct several new traffic system communications paths. The following describes the future paths by communications medium. 3.3.2.1 Future Copper Wire Interconnect New copper wire based interconnect will be installed to close the communications infrastructure gap between East H Street/ Tierra Del Rey and East H Street/Paseo Ranchero on the future adaptive traffic signals project identified in Section 3.3.35. 3.3.2.2 Future Single-mode Fiber Interconnect New fiber routes will be constructed in conjunction with the following projects: • The South Bay Rapid project installs new City-owned conduit and single-mode fiber optic cable along portions of I-805, East Palomar Street, Eastlake Parkway, Birch Road, and SR-125. • The Main Street Fiber Optic Project installs new conduit and fiber, with City-owned inner-duct and dedicated fiber, along Main Street from Industrial Boulevard to SR-125. • In the Rancho Del Rey area, new conduit and single-mode fiber optic cable will be installed along portions of North Rancho Del Rey Parkway, South Rancho Del Rey Parkway, Ridgeback Road, Otay Lakes Road, East H Street, and Corral Canyon Road. 3.3.2.3 Future Wireless Interconnect New wireless interconnect will be installed at the following locations: 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 380 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 32 • Industrial Boulevard and L Street (Drop) to Industrial Boulevard and Naples Street. • 4th Avenue and L Street (Existing Fiber) to Hilltop Drive and L Street. • 3rd Avenue and H Street (Existing Fiber) to 3rd Avenue and I Street. 3.3.3 Future AdapƟve Tra ffic Control System Grant funding from the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) will implement an Adaptive Traffic Control System (ATCS) at 28 signalized intersections on East H Street, Paseo Ranchero, Otay Lakes Road, and Telegraph Canyon Road. Twelve of the 28 project signals are existing SCATS signals that are being replaced with the new AT SC system and 16 are non-adaptive signals. The traffic signal communications will be upgraded to an Ethernet/IP network. The SynchroGreen™ ATCS system was selected and implementation is anticipated in mid to late 2017. 3.3.4 Future Coordinated Corridors Four new traffic signal coordination networks are planned, in addition to the 22 existing corridors on the streets listed below and shown on Figure 3-2. • East H Street: Bonita Vista High School Driveway to Eastlake Drive. • Eastlake Parkway: Greensgate Drive to Commercial Driveway. • East Palomar Street: I-805 to Olympic Parkway. • Otay Lakes Road: Allen School Lane to Bonita Vista Middle School Driveway. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 381 (###) (###) (###) (###) ### ### ### ### ### ñ !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$508 !"#$508 !"#$508 ·|}þ54·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 150 119 (103)30 (103)41 (114)59 (113)88(103)23 (103)17 (110)61 (105)39 (104)38 (111)63 (110)78 (104)37 (110)62 (122)265 (122)283 (122)285(122)288 (121)143 (117)286 (114)219 (103)281 (103)280 (113)260 (120)217 (120)213 (120)121 (117)105 (125)124 (125)142 (117)287 (124)221 (116)102 (120)112 (122)284 (122)282 (128)273 (121)264 (121)266 (121)267 (122)244 (122)237 (122)238 (122)259 (122)257(122)256(122)262(122)261 (122)251 (121)248 (121)247 (122)245 (122)243 (122)233 (122)252 (122)222 (128)258 (124)253 (121)250 (121)227 (103)254 (121)224 (121)225 (121)242 (121)241 (121)240 (121)239 (122)236(122)235 (128)234 (121)226 (124)223 (118)218 (120)216 (128)214 (118)170 (118)166 (118)174 (118)169 (118)172 (118)183(118)182 (124)179 (124)178 (124)152 (118)161 (118)153 (126)131 (126)129 (120)122 (116)101 (124)155 (128)177 (124)164 (128)181 (124)158 (120)120 (115)159 (118)199 (124)195 (128)202 (128)203 (124)211 (101)206 (122)207 (128)200 (128)204 (128)196 (116)193 (128)194 (128)186 (128)205 (124)191 (124)187 (124)208 (124)188 (124)184 (121)198 255115 117 113 114 116 118 173 135 128 (112)83(112)80 (113)68 (115)92 (106)29 (106)28 (109)57 (114)75 (114)73 (113)89 (117)94 (117)90 (117)91 (114)74 (109)31 (114)72 (113)71 (109)55 (108)54 (108)53 (105)24 (113)70 (114)76(109)58 (109)56 (105)26 (105)25 (106)27 (123)22 (113)69(108)52 (115)87 (109)51(105)40 (108)79 (108)49 (108)50 (123)20 (110)81 (108)84(108)82 (111)85 (102)11 (102)12 (110)77(102)13 (110)60(108)44(104)33(102)14 (123)15 (108)48 (108)47(104)36 (123)16 (123)21 (115)95 (111)86 (112)67 (112)66 (112)65 (123)19 (123)18 (108)46(104)35 (108)64 (104)34 (107)45 (107)43 (107)42 (118)96 (118)97 (118)98 (108)93 (116)99 (125)125 (117)278 (106)136 (117)104 (125)126 (117)103 (116)154 (103)146 (116)109 (125)127 (117)168 (116)110 (105)192 (107)149 (115)108 (121)107(121)106 (102)151 (124)271(124)270 (128)268 (128)269 (124)220 (125)228 (127)246(127)230 (127)229 (127)139 (118)165 (118)156 (118)163 (118)162 (118)141 (124)176 (124)175 (118)171 (118)147 (118)144 (126)132 (116)100 (126)140 (126)133 (127)167 (124)145 (124)148 (127)137 (124)157(124)123 (116)197 (128)201 (118)189 (118)190 (128)185 E H ST E J ST MAIN ST I ST OLYMPIC PYH ST03RD AV J ST E ST L ST F ST BAY BLOTAYLAKESRD HUNTEPYBROADWAYK ST E PALOMAR S THILLTOP DR D ST 01ST AV MOSS ST LA MEDIA RDPALOMAR ST05TH AV NAPLES ST TELEGRA P H C A N Y O N RD ANITA ST 02ND AV E L ST E NAPLES S T ORANGE AV G ST C ST HERI TA G E R D LANEAVP R OCTORVALLEYRD PASEO L ADERAB O N IT A RDCLUBH O U S E D R E I ST E OXFORD S T FLOWER ST S RANCHO D E L R E Y PY N R A NCHODELREYPY WUE STERDN 0 2 N D A VN G REEN S V IEWD R E X P L O RATIONFALLSDR PROCTOR VALLEY RD BAY BL E H ST W U E S T E R D02ND AV C ST G ST 05TH AVI ST K ST FLOWER S T 01ST AVHERITAGE RD ANITA STANITA ST WUESTE RDSAN DIEGO S.D. COUNTY CORONADO NATIONAL CITY SAN DIEGO IMPERIAL BEACH S.D. COUNTY LANDFILL S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY (121)263 (128)215 (124)160 (128)209 (106)32 (109)279 (126)130 (126)111 (124)134 (127)138 04TH AVEASTLAKE PY EAS T L A K E P Y BIRCH RD INDUSTR IAL BLBRANDYWINE AVBONITA RDMT M I G U E L R D E ORANG E A V PASEO RANCHEROPASEO DEL REYMEDICAL CENTER DRCREST DRSAN MIGUEL RANCH RD N 04TH AVTIERRA DEL REYE F L O W E R S T E PALOMAR D R ARTISAN ST 03RD AVE 07TH STE NAPLES CT MAIN STMAIN ST 03RD AV HERITAGE RD Figure 3-2 Future Coordinated Corridors Legend ###System Control Number (###)Communication Number !(Coordinated City Signal !(Non-Coordinated City Signal !(Future Coordinated City Signal !(City-Caltrans Coordinated Signal !(Caltrans Traffic Signal City of Chula Vista ñ City Hall Existing Coordinated Corridors BONITA RD BROADWAY E STREET EAST H STREET FIFTH AVE FOURTH AVE H STREET HILLTOP DR L STREET MAIN STREET OLYMPIC PKWY ORANGE AVE ORANGE AVE/OLYMPIC PKWY OTAY LAKES RD PALOMAR ST TELEGRAPH CANYON RD THIRD AVE Future Coordinated Corridors EAST H ST EAST PALOMAR EASTLAKE PKWY OTAY LAKES RD 0 0.5 10.25 Miles Document Path: S:\Projects\Chula Vista\0347_Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan\04 Design\GIS\MXD Files\Chula Vista Comm MP (10.3).mxd/ 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 382 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 34 3.3.5 Future Roadways The Otay Ranch Villages Sectional Planning Area (SPA) plans and documentation provided by the City’s Public Works and Engineering Departments were researched for future roadway construction. The new roadways are anticipated in the East subarea for Otay Ranch Villages 3, 8 East, 8 West, 9, and 10. A dynamic layer in GIS documents the location, street names, and associated project in the attribute table. 3.3.6 Future Roadway Widening Specific Plans and Master Plans throughout the City were researched to identify future roadway widening projects which can provide potential opportunities to expand the traffic communications systems infrastructure. The Chula Vista Urban Core Specific Plan Mobility Element Section 3 outlined Future Conditions and Street Improvement Opportunities including: • Widening of E Street between Woodlawn Avenue and I-5 to serve traffic needs, reduce queues in the westbound direction, and improve operations at the I-5 Northbound ramp at Woodlawn Avenue. • Widening of H Street from 3rd Avenue to Broadway to accommodate buildout traffic, improve segment operations, and reach the ultimate classification of H Street per the General Plan. • Widening of Broadway between E Street and F Street to accommodate a consistent configuration along Broadway between C Street and L Street including a raised medians and bike lanes. Appendix C contains the complete list of future transportation projects and traffic signals within the City. 3.4 SANDAG 2050 RTP The SANDAG 2050 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) was referenced to gather information on future roadway projects that are planned to be constructed over the next 33 years. RTP Appendix A (2050 RTP Projects, Costs, and Phasing) was researched to obtain additional information for each respective project. Due to funding limitations and uncertainties, only arterial projects contained in the revenue constrained plan were inventoried. Within the City of Chula Vista, two projects have been identified and summarized in Table A.8 (Phased Arterial Projects – Revenue Constrained Plan) including: • Willow Street Bridge Project: Replace and widen the existing bridge, including shoulders, on Willow Street from Bonita Road to Sweetwater Road. This project is currently in construction. • North Fourth Avenue and Brisbane Street Project: Widen Fourth Avenue to add an additional lane on the east side of the roadway. The Future Road Network for the City of Chula Vista is illustrated in Figure 3-3. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 383 (###) (###) (###) (###) ### ### ### ### ###!!!!!!!!!!!!ñ !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( #* #* #*#*#*#*#*#* #*#* #* #* #*#*#*#*#*#*#* #* #* #* #* #*#* #*#*#* #* #*#* !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$508 !"#$508 !"#$508 ·|}þ54·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 E H ST E J ST MAIN ST 04TH AVI ST OLYMPIC PYH ST03RD AV J ST E ST L ST F ST BAY BLOTAYLAKESRD HUNTE PYBROADWAYK ST E PALOMAR S THILLTOP DR D ST 01ST AV MOSS ST LAMEDI ARD PALOMAR ST05TH AV NAPLES ST TE L E GRAPH CA NYONRD ANITA ST 02ND AV E L ST E NAPLES S T ORANGE AV G ST C ST HERI T A G E R DLANEAVPROCTOR VALLEY RD PA S EOLADERA B O N IT A RDCLUB H O U S E D R E I ST EORA N G E A VE OXFORD S T FLOWER S T S RANCHO D E L R E Y PY N R A NCHODELREYPY PASEO D E LREYWUE STERDN 0 2 N D A VN G REEN S V IEWD R E X P L O RATIONFALLSDRCREST DRE F L O W E R S T E PALOMAR D R E H ST W U E S T E R D 05TH AV K ST02ND AVHERITAGE RDI ST 01ST AVBAY BL G ST ANITA STANITA ST 03RD AVC ST WUESTE RDMAIN KJ HERITAGEMONTACETRIBUTARYMAIN W BS T R E E T " A "SR 125 S A N T A M A R I S O L ARI OTAY VALLEY U N I V E R S I T Y STREET "E"STREET "I"STREET "D"S A N T A D A V I S S A N T A T I PO DI S C O V E R Y F A L L S SA N T A M A C H E T O CAR AWA Y STREET "F"CALLE SWANS E A SOLS T ICE STREET "D"SR 125MAINSR 1 2 5 OTAY VALLEY MAIN SAN DIEGO S.D. COUNTY CORONADO NATIONAL CITY SAN DIEGO IMPERIAL BEACH S.D. COUNTY LANDFILL S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY 255115 117 114 116 118 173 135 150 128 (112)83(112)80 (113)68 (106)28 (114)73 (113)89 (103)41 (117)94 (117)90 (117)91 (109)31 (114)72 (113)71 (109)55 (108)54 (108)53 (105)24 (113)70 (109)58 (109)56 (106)32 (105)26 (105)25 (106)27 (123)22 (103)23 (113)69(108)52 (109)51(105)40 (108)79 (103)17 (108)49 (108)50(105)39 (104)38(123)20 (110)81 (108)84(108)82 (111)63 (111)85 (102)11 (102)12 (110)77(102)13 (110)78 (108)44(104)33 (123)15 (104)37 (108)48 (108)47(104)36 (123)16 (123)21 (111)86 (112)67 (112)66 (112)65 (123)19 (123)18 (108)46(104)35 (108)64 (104)34 (107)45 (107)43 (118)98 (108)93 (116)99 (125)125 (121)143 (117)286 (114)219 (103)281 (103)280 (117)278 (113)260 (120)217 (120)213 (106)136 (120)121 (117)104 (125)126 (117)105 (117)103 (116)154 (103)146 (125)127 (117)168 (116)110 (125)124 (105)192 (107)149 (115)108 (121)107 (125)142 (117)287 (124)221 (116)102 (120)112 (122)284 (121)263 (121)266 (121)267 (122)244 (124)271(124)270 (128)268 (128)269 (122)257(122)256(122)262(122)261 (122)251 (121)248 (121)247 (122)245 (122)243 (122)233 (122)222 (124)253 (124)220 (121)250 (125)228 (103)254 (127)246 (121)224 (121)225 (121)242 (121)241 (121)240 (121)239 (122)236(122)235 (128)234 (127)229 (121)226 (124)223 (118)218 (120)216 (128)214 (127)139 (118)165 (118)170 (118)174 (118)163 (118)162 (118)141 (118)169 (118)172 (118)183(118)182 (124)179 (124)178 (124)152 (118)171 (118)161 (118)153 (118)147 (118)144 (126)132 (126)131 (126)129 (116)100 (116)101 (126)140 (126)133 (127)167 (128)177 (124)164 (124)145 (128)181 (124)148 (127)138 (127)137 (124)158 (124)157(124)123(120)120 (115)159 (118)199 (116)197 (124)195 (128)202 (128)203 (128)201 (118)189 (124)211 (101)206(118)190 (128)200 (128)185 (128)204 (128)196 (116)193 (128)194 (128)186 (128)205 (124)191 (124)187 (124)208 (124)188 (124)184 EASTLAKE PY EAS T L A K E P Y BIRCH RD INDUSTR IAL BL PROCTOR VALLEY RD BRANDYWINE AVBONITA R D MT M I G U E L R D FLOWER ST PASEO RANCHEROMEDICAL CENTER DRSAN MIGUEL RANCH RD N 04TH AVTIERRA DEL REYARTISAN ST 03RD AVE 07TH STE NAPLES CT MAIN ST HERITAGE RD MAIN ST 113 119 (115)92 (106)29 (109)57(103)30 (114)75 (114)74 (114)76 (114)59 (113)88 (115)87 (110)61 (110)60 (102)14 (115)95 (110)62 (107)42 (118)96 (118)97 (122)265 (122)283 (122)285(122)288 (109)279 (116)109 (121)106 (102)151 (122)282 (128)273 (121)264 (122)237 (122)238 (122)259 (122)252 (128)258 (121)227 (128)215 (127)230 (118)156 (118)166 (124)176 (124)175 (126)130 (120)122 (126)111 (124)155 (124)134 (124)160 (122)207 (128)209 (121)198 Figure 3-3 Future Roadway Network Legend ###System Control Number (###)Communication Number #*Existing Adaptive Traffic Signal #*Future Adaptive Traffic Signal !(Existing Traffic Signal !(Offline Existing Traffic Signal !(Future Traffic Signal Future Copper ! !Future Wireless Traffic Interconnect Caltrans Fiber Future Roads Future Roadway Widening City of Chula Vista ñ City Hall 0 0.5 10.25 Miles Document Path: S:\Projects\Chula Vista\0347_Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan\04 Design\GIS\MXD Files\Chula Vista Comm MP Phase Implementation.mxd/ 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 384 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 36 4 Future System Architecture and ITS Elements The future City traffic signal communication system architecture will link all system elements creating one ubiquitous network on which all devices will communicate. The Master Plan architecture is conceived as a reliable and future-proof network that will meet any City transportation system need. This section presents the network and ITS elements, standardization, topology, physical and logical requirements to achieve the future communication system concept. Several architecture examples are provided to demonstrate system connectivity and resiliency. This section also presents the communication system relation to Chula Vista Smart City transportation initiatives. A schematic detailing the future traffic system communications architecture concept is provided in Appendix D. 4.1 Future Network StandardizaƟon Today’s “continuously connected” devices like smart phones, tablets and personal computers use Ethernet protocol to connect with each other and the internet. The world’s communication systems are based on the Ethernet protocol. There are no more separate data networks or voice networks as there were during 1980’s. Nowadays one common Ethernet network utilizing Internet Protocol (IP) efficiently handles both voice and data. Since Ethernet networks are ubiquitous the cost of communications equipment has continuously declined while the communications capabilities increase. The “Internet of Things” (IoT) applications will cause even further decline in Ethernet equipment price. Additionally, there are plenty of knowledgeable network engineers and technicians to support these new networks. The newer traffic, transportation, and ITS devices are either standardized on Ethernet interface or offer Ethernet interface as an option. Yet to be invented future devices will most likely support Ethernet interface. Ethernet provides a “future proof” network for the foreseeable future. The City of Chula Vista future traffic signal communication system network will be based on Ethernet protocol. The future network will combine multiple communications medium such as single mode fiber, existing copper plant, point-to-multipoint wireless, and cellular. The future “CORE” network will use Layer 3 nodes connecting to each other via single mode fiber links. The future Ethernet/ IP protocol network shall be designed as a two-tiered network. Tier 1 will utilize the Layer 3 node equipment connected to each other in a ring network fashion using 10 Gbps or higher speed links. Tier 2 will utilize the Layer 2 Managed Field Ethernet Switches (MFES) such as VDSL switches, field Ethernet switches, and wireless broadband radios also connected to each other in a ring network fashion at various speed links, depending on the equipment on that link. ITS devices such as traffic controllers, 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 385 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 37 conflict monitors, CCTV cameras, Dynamic Message Signs (DMS), vehicle detectors, transit and emergency vehicle pre-emption devices, etc. will connect to the copper ports of Layer 2 MFES. The network architecture topology example is shown in Figure 4-1. The main feature of the future traffic signal communication system is its self-healing capability. The MFES’s, equipped with either dual fiber ports or dual VDSL ports, will connect to each other in a daisy chain fashion and to the Layer 3 nodes eliminating single point of failure and providing unattended, automatic self-healing capability. Figure 4-1 Future CORE Ring Network Topology Example At every traffic system location, the self-healing ring technology will be utilized as much as financially possible. When implemented, the City will have a state-of-the-art, future proof network that will be easily expandable to serve the city across diverse geography and services. The City of Chula Vista traffic signal communication system will simultaneously support multiple different ITS applications including: • Existing and future traffic controllers. • CCTV cameras. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 386 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 38 • Conflict monitors. • Dynamic message signs. • Highway advisory radios. • Vehicle detection systems, (radar, video, etc.). • Emergency vehicle pre-emption systems. • Bluetooth and/or Wi-Fi based travel time systems. • Upcoming Vehicle to Infrastructure (V2I) systems and “Autonomous Vehicle” systems. In addition to the above ITS applications, the future traffic signal communication system will support • All future “Smart City” related applications. • All future Wi-Fi communications anywhere in the City including the “Chula Vista Smart Bayfront” project. The network will also support: • Public message billboards and public messaging systems. • Voice, video, streamed video services, and video conferencing among departments. • Any future Ethernet based communication devices and/ or services. At the City’s discretion, the network will be able to provide bandwidth and/ or ports sharing capability to different City departments. The same network could also provide bandwidth to private enterprises. 4.2 Future Network Architecture Examples Figure 4-2 shows one Layer 2 fiber switch based self-healing ring and four Layer 2 VDSL switch (copper) based self-healing rings. Each Layer 2 switch ring starts from a Layer 3 Ethernet router and terminates on a different Layer 3 Ethernet router. The Layer 3 ring starts at the TMC from the Layer 3 Ethernet router NODE TMC-1 and goes through NODE A, NODE B, NODE C and returns to the TMC and terminates on a different Layer 3 router NODE TMC-2. This topology eliminates any single point of failure, fiber cut or a node failure and the self-healing capability is the main principle of the future network design concept. Figure 4-3 shows one Layer 2 fiber switch based self-healing ring starting from a Layer 3 Ethernet router NODE A and terminating on a different Layer 3 Ethernet router NODE C. In this topology if a Layer 2 fiber switch fails, the fiber switches left of the failure point will communicate to NODE A and the fiber switches right of the failure point will communicate to NODE C. All the devices attached to Layer 2 switches will recover communications to the TMC automatically. Only the devices attached to the failed switch will lose communications to the TMC. If a fiber link fails, the devices attached to that switch will recover communications to the TMC via the other port. In addition, to illustrate the “dual homing” concept, a Layer 2 fiber switch is connected to both NODE A and NODE B and a second Layer 2 fiber switch is connected to both NODE B and NODE C. If one fiber link fails for a Layer 2 fiber switch, it will still communicate to the TMC via the other NODE. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 387 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 39 Figure 4-2 Future Fiber and Copper Rings Network Topology Example 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 388 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 40 Figure 4-3 Future Fiber Switch Ring Topology Example Figure 4-4 shows one Layer 2 VDSL switch (copper) based self-healing ring start from a Layer 3 Ethernet router NODE A and terminate on a different Layer 3 Ethernet router NODE B. In this topology if a Layer 2 VDSL switch fails, the VDSL switches left of the failure point will communicate to NODE A and the VDSL switches right of the failure point will communicate to NODE B. All the devices attached to Layer 2 VDSL switches will automatically recover communications to the TMC. Only the devices attached to the failed VDSL switch will lose communications to the TMC. If a VDSL link fails, the devices attached to that switch will recover communications to the TMC via the other port. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 389 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 41 Figure 4-4 Future VDSL Copper Switch Ring Network Topology Example Figure 4-5 shows one Layer 2 fiber switch based self-healing ring starting from the Layer 3 Ethernet router NODE A and terminating on the Layer 3 Ethernet router NODE C. Figure 4-5 also shows a second self- healing ring composed of Layer 2 VDSL switches, starting from the Layer 2 fiber switch, Switch #1 on the left and terminating on a different Layer 2 switch, Switch #2 on the right. Fiber Layer 2 switch, Switch #1 and VDSL switch, Switch #3 are collocated on the left and Fiber Layer 2 switch, Switch #2 and VDSL switch, Switch #4 are collocated on the right. Fiber and VDSL switches connect to each other via a short CAT 5 cable inside the traffic controller cabinet. In this topology if a Layer 2 switch (fiber or VDSL) fails, both the fiber switches based ring and the VDSL switches based ring will automatically recover communications to the TMC via either Switch #1 or Switch #2. Only the devices attached to the failed Layer 2 switch (fiber or VDSL) will lose communications to the TMC. If a link (fiber or copper) fails, the devices attached to that switch will recover communications to the TMC via the other port. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 390 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 42 Figure 4-5 Future VDSL Copper Switch Ring to Fiber Switch Ring Topology Figure 4-6 shows isolated signals that are not on fiber routes on the city-owned copper wire routes, and signals that are on the city-owned copper wire routes but with no direct connection to a Layer 3 router. These isolated signals will use a 4G wireless router (also called a cellular modem) and communicate to the TMC over the 4G cellular service provider owned IoT service. Those signals that are on the city-owned copper wire routes but with no direct connection to a Layer 3 router will also communicate to the TMC using a 4G wireless router collocated with the “head-end” Layer 2 VDSL switch over the same 4G cellular service provider owned IoT service. In this topology, if a 4G router fails, only that single signal or the whole VDSL line is lost. If the IoT router, or the Firewall at the TMC or the link to the IoT service from the TMC fails, the communication to the 4G routers will be recovered via the second IoT link from NODE B. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 391 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 43 Figure 4-6 Future IoT over Cellular Wireless Network Topology Example Figure 4-7 shows three different owned wireless network topology examples utilizing 802.11 ac (or the latest technology) wireless radios with integrated and external antennas. The same self-healing scenarios explained in prior cases also apply. If a remote radio or the wireless link from that remote radio location fails, only that location loses communications to the TMC. If a master radio fails, all the locations communicating with the master radio fails. Where geographically possible, mesh wireless links should be used. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 392 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 44 Figure 4-7 Future Owned Wireless Network Topology Example 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 393 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 45 Figure 4-8 Future Redundant and Self-Healing Ring Architecture 4.2.1 TSCC CommunicaƟon Ports All the Digi boards at the TSCC will be removed, discarded and replaced with “Virtual Com Port” software provided by Digi. The Virtual Com Port software allows the existing traffic controller software that was communicating with the existing 170E controllers over its Serial port to communicate over the new Ethernet network without any hardware or firmware changes to the 170E controller in the field. Only a new Digi N2S-170 Card will be installed in the modem slot of the 170E controller. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 394 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 46 4.2.2 Bandwidth Requirements The vast bandwidth of a modern Ethernet network dramatically increases accessibility to all ITS devices and applications within the traffic signal network, including streaming video from CCTV cameras and emerging technologies such as Connected Vehicles and Smart City applications. While the initial upgrade to Ethernet will effectively over-provision the capacity requirements of existing technology, the use of managed network switches allows for resource reservation control mechanisms ensuring Quality of Service (QoS) can be delivered to critical applications and/or devices. 4.2.2.1 Traffic Signal Cabinet Assemblies and Components The assemblies and components of a traffic signal cabinet were originally developed under the restrictions of legacy communication networks where bandwidth was a scarce resource. These utilize a minimal portion of the overall bandwidth available in an Ethernet network. A single IP surveillance camera consumes several orders of magnitude more bandwidth than bandwidth consumed by all the traffic controllers within the same network. However, cumulative impact of thousands of devices can overload the network. The traffic control devices consuming minimal bandwidth include: • Traffic Controller Unit • Conflict Monitor Unit • Preemption Phase Selector • Battery Backup Unit 4.2.2.2 IP Surveillance Cameras Real time video streaming over IP is the chief consumer of network bandwidth in a traffic signal communication network. Live video is paramount to the effective management of signal operations at individual intersections and along arterial routes. Video detection cameras and Pan-Tilt-Zoom (PTZ) cameras are commonly used to monitor the flow of the traffic. The bandwidth utilized by cameras ranges from 0.5 to 5 bps per camera1. The following parameters affect the actual bandwidth consumed by an IP video camera system and one must consider the following factors: • Video encoding algorithm, like H.265 (AVC), H.264, MPEG-4, MPEG-2, Motion JPEG. • Resolution. • Frames per second. • Number of Cameras. 4.2.2.3 Dynamic Message Signs Dynamic Message Signs (DMS) provide travelers with real-time or advanced notice information for traffic conditions, roadway incidents, construction, community events, and other alerts. LED signs are most common and are energy-efficient, bright, and highly legible. Character size and number of lines differ among manufacturers and signs are capable of multi-colored and graphical displays, providing the City 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 395 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 47 with advertisement placement opportunities. Signs can be managed remotely utilizing the traffic systems communications network. DMS include portable and fixed sign deployments or installations. Portable DMS are mounted to a trailer with hydraulic lift mechanisms and positioned on the side of a roadway prior to diversion points or connecting roadways. Portable DMS are self-powered utilizing solar panels or batteries and the messages are typically changed remotely from the TMC utilizing wireless or cellular communications. The City currently owns two portable DMS signs that are used exclusively by the Chula Vista Police Department. Two additional portable DMS signs are recommended for City Traffic Operations staff use. Fixed DMS are larger overhead signs that are mounted to a fixed pole and positioned at central areas of interest to provide the greatest benefit for shared travel information. Fixed DMS utilize a local power source and can communicate with the TMC through the cable based traffic systems communications network. It is recommended that the City install fixed DMS signs in advance of freeway ramps and at the Chula Vista Amphitheater. Both portable and fixed DMS should be used to share traffic information related, but not limited to: recurring congestion, traffic incidents, special events, construction, maintenance activities, road closures, detour routes, etc. To ensure security, rights for device use, including both view and control, should be assigned to prevent unauthorized access. 4.2.2.4 Demand for Real-Time Data Future transportation management systems will exchange traffic data with a multitude of independent and/or integrated mobility applications that will allow travelers and system operators to make informed decisions. Smartphone applications like, Waze, HERE WeGo, Inrix Traffic, etc. are now connecting to traffic management systems to exchange data. The data exchange is typically provided through a separate internet connection at the TMC. 4.2.3 IP Addressing Scheme Since the future traffic signal communications network devices are going to be IP based, each device in the network must have at least one IP address. IP addresses are in the form of First Octet. Second Octet. Third Octet. Fourth Octet. An example IP address is 192.168.1.123. The future IP scheme for the City of Chula Vista Master Plan is as follows. • First Octet = ABC. • Second Octet = XYZ. • Third octet = Device ID organized by associated hub and location east or west of I-805. • Fourth Octet = Intersection ID organized by corridor and direction, east to west or north to south. The IP addressing scheme is provided to the City in a separate document due the sensitivity of the information. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 396 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 48 4.3 Smart City Chula Vista The City is implementing a vision of a 21st century Smart City that includes building a robust, technically advanced transportation network that connects the City both geographically and on the information superhighway. The Master Plan is compatible with Chula Vista’s Smart City initiatives and advances several Smart Infrastructure applications including: video, lighting, parking, transportation, public transportation and shuttles, zero emissions vehicles, environmental sensors, and public safety. The ITS improvements will reduce congestion throughout the City, advance the City’s Climate Action Plan goals, and promote sustainability. 4.3.1 Automated Vehicle Proving Grounds In January 2017, the U.S. Department of Transportation (US DOT) designated 10 Automated Vehicle (AV) proving ground pilot sites to encourage testing and information sharing for AV technologies across a variety of climates, entity types, speed zones, and concentration. SANDAG, Caltrans, and City of Chula Vista were jointly selected in response to the US DOT pilot program application solicitation2. The San Diego region has three proving ground environments: the I-15 Express Lanes from SR-163 to SR-78, the SR-125 South Bay Express Way from East Chula Vista to the United States-Mexico border, and the City of Chula Vista. The local network of streets and roadways in Chula Vista will be used as a testbed for AV technology3. 4.3.2 I-805 AcƟve Tra ffic and Demand Management The City of Chula Vista is a stakeholder in the Active Traffic and Demand Management (ATDM) program which will be deployed on the I-805 South corridor from SR-94 to the United States-Mexico border. This heavily-utilized commuter corridor provides access to and from National City, Chula Vista, San Diego, and beyond. The AT DM project seeks to utilize technology and interagency communications to optimize and maintain trip reliability, increase throughput, minimize delay, promote institutional coordination, and increase technical integration across all modes and jurisdictions. Travel information will be collected, processed, and shared with roadway users to enhance planning for timely arrival at destinations. Twenty-five different ATDMS strategies have been identified in the ATDM Concept of Operations with deployment categorized by timeframe: Short Term (1-3 Years), Medium Term (4-7 Years), and Long Term (8-10 Years). The strategies outlined will be enhanced by the additional operational functions the City currently has and/or is 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 397 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 49 improving including: travel time monitoring on Telegraph Canyon Road and implementation of the new Adaptive Traffic Signal Control system. 4.3.3 Connected Vehicle Technology Connected vehicle applications have many benefits including increased roadway safety with the potential to greatly reduce or eliminate collisions, improve mobility and roadway capacity, environmental sustainability, and infrastructure management. Connections between vehicles and infrastructure (V2I) is a critical element of the connected vehicle environment and requires infrastructure preparation on the part of public agencies that own and operate transportation systems. V2I deployments have emerged over the past several years with the most prevalent issued by AASHTO; the National Connected Vehicle Signal Phase and Timing (SPaT) challenge. The goal of the SPaT challenge is to deploy roadside Dedicated Short Range Communications (DSRC) radio infrastructure to broadcast SPaT data on at least 1 corridor or street network in all 50 states by January 20204. Connected vehicle technology requires reliable, secure, fast communication with low latency that is not vulnerable to environmental conditions or multipath transmissions, and has wide interoperability. DSRC is the most standardized and tested connected vehicle communication technology. The FHWA is currently proposing a mandate for DSRC to be built into all new vehicles by 20225. Other wireless communications technology alternatives to DSRC have emerged including cellular and cellular hybrid. The most likely near term (say 5 year) deployment of V2I in the City would be associated with a pilot demonstration deployment. If connected vehicle technology is mandated by the FHWA to be built into new vehicles there would be a significant interest on the part of transportation agencies to widely deploy connected vehicle communications technology in infrastructure. The infrastructure side of the V2I communication link requires a roadside unit (RSU), compatible traffic signal hardware, and communication systems. The most limiting factor with connected vehicle technology deployment is cost, both cost to vehicle manufacturers and transportation infrastructure owners and operators. Opportunities in the form of federal aid funds will likely become available in the future to deploy these communications systems. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 398 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 50 The recommendations made in this Master Plan will support the service requirements of future V2I network traffic. The communication system architecture concept includes an over provision of bandwidth, is distributed throughout City, and utilizes NTCIP-complaint hardware and Ethernet communications protocols for a V2I ready infrastructure platform. 4.3.3.1 Predictive Traffic Signals Advancements in V2I communications include traffic signal and in-vehicle systems that can utilize SPaT information to communicate information to the driver. Several in-vehicle information systems and smart phone applications for predictive traffic signal technology have already been developed and deployed. Generally, information from traffic signal controllers and/ or the central traffic management system is collected and communicated to a third-party data aggregation provider. SPaT data is processed through algorithms and predicted traffic signal red or green state and red times are pushed through an internet connection, typically cellular communications, to display in-vehicle or on the driver’s smartphone. This type of information can enhance the way a motorist makes decisions when approaching signals based on the signal state, travel speed, and time. These features ultimately reduce idling, stop-and-go traffic, pollution, and red-light violation collisions. Third-party data aggregation providers, such as Traffic Technology Systems (TTS) and Connected Signals, Inc. have deployed predictive traffic signal technology in cooperation with automotive manufacturers. TTS is teamed with Audi to deploy an in-dash subscription service which provides a countdown for red lights, 4 second alert before a red-light change, and a heads-up display when a vehicle approaches a signal that is about to change phases. The agency’s central traffic management system connects to the TTS system “cloud” to transmit SPaT data. The TTS receives the SPaT data and then sends the predictive information to the OEM backend system which sends it to the vehicle. This system has been successfully demonstrated in Las Vegas, NV and active deployments are planned throughout the US6. The City of Chula Vista is currently considering a partnership agreement with TTS. Connected Signals developed the EnLighten application to provide predictive traffic signal information for BMW vehicles through an in-dash subscription service as well as to drivers that do not own compatible vehicles through their smartphone application. Countdown information is displayed when stopped at a red light and a chime alert sounds seconds prior to the light turning green. Connected Signals utilizes a device on the agency premises to connect to the internet and central traffic management system for receiving SPAT data. The Connected Signals cloud receives the SPaT data and then sends the predictive information to the user’s smart phone or in-vehicle system. EnLighten is currently available in Portland 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 399 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 51 and Eugene, Oregon with testing in progress in the City of San Jose in cooperation with BMW and the U.S. Department of Energy’s Argonne National Laboratory7. 4.3.4 Intelligent Street LighƟng Networked street lighting control systems reduce costs associated with operating and maintaining street lights. The City of Chula Vista was the first in the region to implement LED lighting technology Citywide and is currently working with multiple vendors to install and test street lights, as part of a pilot, with communication and sensor technologies that create a smart grid street light system. The system can also be leveraged to capture high-density time-stamped real-time and historical event data, using the Internet of Things (IoT) cloud storage, for a variety of Smart City applications including vehicle traffic, pedestrian traffic, and parking. Travel data includes vehicle speed, direction, lane use, volumes, pedestrian activity, and parking utilization. This information will enable the City of Chula Vista to more accurately: • Identify recurring traffic, flow issues, high-incident areas, traffic violation patterns. • Perform more extensive ‘before and after’ analyses to illustrate changes in driver behavior. • Identify sidewalk and crosswalk utilization to enhance pedestrian safety. • Develop strategic demand-based parking pricing based on parking usage and vacancy periods. • Provide better parking enforcement for overstay, no-parking zone, and loading zone violations. The City of San Diego has recently partnered with Current, powered by GE, to deploy 3,200 sensor nodes on City street lights to create a multi-application City IoT network. The nodes can perform a variety of applications including vehicle, pedestrian, and bicycle monitoring, parking availability, air quality sensing, and gunshot detection. The data from the sensor nodes will be processed and stored on a cloud-based server. The deployment of the nodes is slated to begin August 2017 and be completed in July 20188. 4.3.5 Advanced Transporta Ɵon Controllers (ATC) Chula Vista currently uses “Type 170” traffic signal controllers that are built on an old technology platform with limited processing, memory, program, and communications functionality. These legacy controllers are incapable of collecting High-Resolution (Hi-Res) controller data required for advanced traffic measurement and monitoring. The 2070 ATC controller platform will enable collection and reporting of High-Resolution (Hi-Res) controller data. Industry advancements in Hi-Res data processing provide multiple ITS-related applications pertaining to autonomous vehicles, connected vehicles, connected infrastructure, and Smart City technologies. The Intelligent Transportation Systems Joint Program Office (ITS JPO) has provided research data across all modes for these technologies and has outlined how the data collected is being used by public and private organizations9. 4.3.6 Future Technology ApplicaƟons Table 4-1 provides a summary of the various data types and ITS usage applications that the City of Chula Vista may seek to implement in the future to advance the Smart City Chula Vista vision and increase overall travel safety and efficiency throughout the City. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 400 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 52 Table 4-1 ITS Data Applications Summary ITS DATA TYPE DATA UTILIZED AGENCY USES SPaT Signal status, signal timing, timing plans, detection Red light running detection, signal retiming studies, arterial performance measures Trajectory Vehicle Location, Speed, Heading Model development and refinement, new development impact studies, ride sharing applications, vehicle type and route comparisons Parking Space Availability Parking lot location, number of spaces, available spaces, size of spaces by vehicle type Planning and system use analysis, parking applications, traveler information Safety Messages Vehicle size, current location, speed, heading, acceleration status, brake system status V2V and V2I deployment testing and evaluation Infrastructure Alerts Infrastructure-to-Vehicle In-vehicle messaging for variable speed limit signs, dynamic message signs, work zone alerts, tolling rates, and red light running License Plate Recognition License plate data Arterial performance measures, travel time analysis, signal retiming studies Automated Shuttle Synchronized scheduling Self-driving testing, Transit Signal Priority testing, obstacle bypass testing 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 401 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 53 5 Implementation Phasing Plan The existing traffic systems communications network is comprised of numerous network devices and communications media including fiber optic cable, twisted pair copper wire cable, Serial wireless radios, and third-party owned leased copper lines, telephone drops, and cellular service. The analog network is antiquated and incapable of supporting the City’s future ITS technology investments due to limited communications capacity. Implementing one seamless state-of-the-art communications network capable of meeting the City’s existing and future traffic system needs requires a strategically phased approach. The highest priorities include establishing a City-owned traffic signal communication system and implementing Ethernet-compatible systems/network. The existing analog lease lines generate high recurring costs and are incapable of serving modern traffic system technology. Existing investments in communication infrastructure, underground systems, signal interconnect cable, and traffic signal cabinets will continue to be utilized. Obsolete legacy network equipment will be upgraded or decommissioned and replaced with new modern communication technologies. Converting existing technologies to Ethernet- based communications through upgrades is the most cost-effective and rapid deployment approach, enabling improvements across wider areas. Implementation of Master Plan recommendations is divided into three phases over a ten-year period. Deployment for each phase is dependent on availability of funds and accelerated deployment is advantageous for financial, operational, and management purposes. The City should seek grant funding and other opportunities to more quickly complete all implementation phases within 5 years. 5.1 Phase 1: City-Owned Infrastructure (Year 1-3) Phase 1 of the implementation plan includes providing a wholly City-owned traffic signal communication network, converting from Serial to an all Ethernet-based network, upgrading traffic signal controllers to Ethernet protocol, and establishing video monitoring at the City’s highest priority locations. Implementation for Phase 1 is prioritized by proximity to City Hall as well as by street network hierarchy. The downtown area, closest to City Hall, contains the greatest number of signalized intersections operating on costly third-party owned leased communications. The traffic signals in this area are spaced close together and are ideal for implementation of broadband Ethernet wireless radios, which provide cost- effective and rapid communications deployment. Traffic signal equipment will be upgraded to Ethernet- enabled devices and Layer 3 communication hubs will be installed at strategic locations. The following summarizes the Phase 1 traffic signal communications network upgrades: • Upgrade the existing fiber optic system to Ethernet communications. • Convert leased copper lines to City-owned wireless Ethernet radio communications. • Upgrade City-owned copper lines to Ethernet-over-copper communications. • Install City-owned wireless Ethernet radio communications at all offline traffic signals. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 402 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 54 • Convert the leased cellular network for existing Traffic Measurement Devices to City-owned wireless Ethernet radio communications. • Install video monitoring devices at high priority locations. • Install fixed Dynamic Message Signs approaching the Chula Vista Amphitheater. • Obtain 2 portable Dynamic Message Signs for use during planned or unforeseen major traffic impacting events. • Install a satellite Traffic Management Center at the City’s Traffic Operations Maintenance Facility. • Upgrade all traffic signal equipment to Ethernet-enabled devices Citywide. • Implement Layer 3 communication hubs at strategic locations. A summary of the Phase 1 improvements is illustrated in Figure 5-1. 5.2 Phase 2: Infrastructure and Priority Corridors Upgrade (Year 4-6) Phase 2 of the Implementation Plan prioritizes fiber optic communications. Existing communications conduit that has been previously installed throughout Chula Vista will be upgraded to include new fiber optic cable installations. New conduit and fiber optic cable will be installed to resolve all remaining communications gaps and create redundancy. Strategic signalized intersections along priority corridors throughout the City will be upgraded to include type 2070 ATC traffic signal controllers and closed circuit televisions (CCTV) cameras for remote video monitoring. The following summarizes the Phase 2 traffic signal communications network upgrades: • Upgrade existing empty communications conduit and install fiber optic cable. • Install conduit and fiber optic cable to resolve communications gaps in the network and create redundant ring topology. • Upgrade traffic signal equipment on primary fiber optic ring route with fiber devices. • Upgrade traffic signal equipment on priority corridors with new 2070 ATC controllers and CCTV cameras. A summary of the Phase 2 improvements is illustrated in Figure 5-2. 5.3 Phase 3: Citywide Buildout (Year 7-10) Buildout of the traffic signal communications network will be completed in Phase 3. Remaining signalized intersections will be upgraded with type 2070 ATC traffic signal controllers and closed-circuit television (CCTV) cameras for remote video monitoring. Signalized intersections with existing analog video detection will be upgraded with analog to Ethernet video encoders to enable remote viewing of the video feeds. A summary of the Phase 3 improvements is illustrated in Figure 5-3. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 403 (###) (###) (###) (###) ### ### ### ### ### XY XY XY XY XY XYXY XYXY XY XY XY XY XY XY XY XY XYXY XY XY XY XY XY XYXY XY XY XY XYXYXY XY XYXYXY XY XY XY XY XYXY XYXYXY XY --¡ÇÖ*ÇÖ*ñ kj ñ !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(3 333 3 3 3 3 33 3333 333 33 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 33 3 3 3 333 333333 3 33 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 33 3 3 33 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 333 3 33 3 33 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 33 3 3 3 333 3 3 3 3 3 3 33 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 33 3 3 33 3 3 3 33 33 3 33 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 33 33 33 3 3 3 3 3 3 31 31 31 31 31 3131 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 3131 31 31 31 31 31 3131 31 3131 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 3131 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 3131 31 31 31 31 31 3131 3131 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 3131 31 31 31 31 31 3131 31 31 31 31 31 31 %, %, %, %, %, %, %, %, %, %,%, %, %, %, %, %, %, %, %, %, %, %, %, %,%,³¸³¸³¸³¸³¸³¸³¸³¸³¸³¸³¸³¸³¸³¸³¸³¸³¸³¸³¸³¸³¸³¸³¸³¸³¸³¸³¸³¸!"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$508 !"#$508 !"#$508 ·|}þ54·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 E H ST E J ST MAIN ST 04TH AVI ST OLYMPIC PYH ST03RD AV J ST E ST L ST F ST BAY BLOTAYLAKESRD HUNTE PYBROADWAYK ST E PALOMAR S THILLTOP DR D ST 01ST AV MOSS ST LAMEDI ARD PALOMAR ST05TH AV NAPLES ST TE L E GRAPH CA NYONRD ANITA ST 02ND AV E L ST E NAPLES S T ORANGE AV G ST C ST HERI T A G E R DLANEAVPROCTOR VALLEY RD PA S EOLADERA B O N IT A RDCLUB H O U S E D R E I ST EORA N G E A VE OXFORD S T FLOWER S T S RANCHO D E L R E Y PY N R A NCHODELREYPY PASEO D E LREYWUE STERDN 0 2 N D A VN G REEN S V IEWD R E X P L O RATIONFALLSDRCREST DRE F L O W E R S T E PALOMAR D R E H ST W U E S T E R D 05TH AV K ST02ND AVHERITAGE RDI ST 01ST AVBAY BL G ST ANITA STANITA ST 03RD AVC ST WUESTE RDMAIN KJ HERITAGEMONTACETRIBUTARYMAIN W BS T R E E T " A "SR 125 S A N T A M A R I S O L ARI OTAY VALLEY U N I V E R S I T Y STREET "E"STREET "I"STREET "D"S A N T A D A V I S S A N T A T I PO DI S C O V E R Y F A L L S SA N T A M A C H E T O CAR AWA Y STREET "F"CALLE SWANS E A SOLS T ICE STREET "D"SR 125MAINSR 1 2 5 OTAY VALLEY MAIN SAN DIEGO S.D. COUNTY CORONADO NATIONAL CITY SAN DIEGO IMPERIAL BEACH S.D. COUNTY LANDFILL S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY 255115 117 114 116 118 173 135 150 128 (112)83(112)80 (113)68 (106)28 (114)73 (113)89 (103)41 (117)94 (117)90 (117)91 (109)31 (114)72 (113)71 (109)55 (108)54 (108)53 (105)24 (113)70 (109)58 (109)56 (106)32 (105)26 (105)25 (106)27 (123)22 (103)23 (113)69(108)52 (109)51(105)40 (108)79 (103)17 (108)49 (108)50(105)39 (104)38(123)20 (110)81 (108)84(108)82 (111)63 (111)85 (102)11 (102)12 (110)77(102)13 (110)78 (108)44(104)33 (123)15 (104)37 (108)48 (108)47(104)36 (123)16 (123)21 (111)86 (112)67 (112)66 (112)65 (123)19 (123)18 (108)46(104)35 (108)64 (104)34 (107)45 (107)43 (118)98 (108)93 (116)99 (125)125 (121)143 (117)286 (114)219 (103)281 (103)280 (117)278 (113)260 (120)217 (120)213 (106)136 (120)121 (117)104 (125)126 (117)105 (117)103 (116)154 (103)146 (125)127 (117)168 (116)110 (125)124 (105)192 (107)149 (115)108 (121)107 (125)142 (117)287 (124)221 (116)102 (120)112 (122)284 (121)263 (121)266 (121)267 (122)244 (124)271(124)270 (128)268 (128)269 (122)257(122)256(122)262(122)261 (122)251 (121)248 (121)247 (122)245 (122)243 (122)233 (122)222 (124)253 (124)220 (121)250 (125)228 (103)254 (127)246 (121)224 (121)225 (121)242 (121)241 (121)240 (121)239 (122)236(122)235 (128)234 (127)229 (121)226 (124)223 (118)218 (120)216 (128)214 (127)139 (118)165 (118)170 (118)174 (118)163 (118)162 (118)141 (118)169 (118)172 (118)183(118)182 (124)179 (124)178 (124)152 (118)171 (118)161 (118)153 (118)147 (118)144 (126)132 (126)131 (126)129 (116)100 (116)101 (126)140 (126)133 (127)167 (128)177 (124)164 (124)145 (128)181 (124)148 (127)138 (127)137 (124)158 (124)157(124)123(120)120 (115)159 (118)199 (116)197 (124)195 (128)202 (128)203 (128)201 (118)189 (124)211 (101)206(118)190 (128)200 (128)185 (128)204 (128)196 (116)193 (128)194 (128)186 (128)205 (124)191 (124)187 (124)208 (124)188 (124)184 EASTLAKE PY EAS T L A K E P Y BIRCH RD INDUSTR IAL BL PROCTOR VALLEY RD BRANDYWINE AVBONITA R D MT M I G U E L R D FLOWER ST PASEO RANCHEROMEDICAL CENTER DRSAN MIGUEL RANCH RD N 04TH AVTIERRA DEL REYARTISAN ST 03RD AVE 07TH STE NAPLES CT MAIN ST HERITAGE RD MAIN ST 113 119 (115)92 (106)29 (109)57(103)30 (114)75 (114)74 (114)76 (114)59 (113)88 (115)87 (110)61 (110)60 (102)14 (115)95 (110)62 (107)42 (118)96 (118)97 (122)265 (122)283 (122)285(122)288 (109)279 (116)109 (121)106 (102)151 (122)282 (128)273 (121)264 (122)237 (122)238 (122)259 (122)252 (128)258 (121)227 (128)215 (127)230 (118)156 (118)166 (124)176 (124)175 (126)130 (120)122 (126)111 (124)155 (124)134 (124)160 (122)207 (128)209 (121)198 Figure 5-1 Phase 1 Improvements Legend ###System Control Number (###)Communication Number ³¸Priority Video Monitoring Locations %,Existing Traffic Signal Ethernet Conversion 31 Single Wireless Ethernet Radio 31 Dual Wireless Ethernet Radio 3 Ethernet Switch !(Existing Traffic Signal !(Offline Existing Traffic Signal !(Future Traffic Signal XY Traffic Measurement Device Future Fiber Existing Copper Existing Fiber Future Roads ñ City Hall TMC ñ Satellite Maintenance Facility TMC kj Chula Vista Amphitheater --¡Fixed Changeable Message Sign ÇÖ*Portable Changeable Message Sign City of Chula Vista 0 0.5 10.25 Miles Document Path: S:\Projects\Chula Vista\0347_Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan\04 Design\GIS\MXD Files\Chula Vista Comm MP Phase Implementation.mxd/ 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 404 (###) (###) (###) (###) ### ### ### ### ###""""""""""""""""""""""!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! # #### # ######## # ## ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^## # ## # ##### # # # ######### ## ®®® ®®®®®®® ®®®®® ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^## # # # ## # # ##^^^^^^^^^^^XXXYY Y Y Y Y YYYY """"""""""===## = = = == ñ !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !ª !ª !ª !ª !ª !ª !ª !ª !ª !ª !ª !ª !ª !ª !ª !ª !ª !ª !ª !ª !ª !ª !ª !ª !ª !ª !ª !ª !(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$508 !"#$508 !"#$508 ·|}þ54·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 E H ST E J ST MAIN ST 04TH AVI ST OLYMPIC PYH ST03RD AV J ST E ST L ST F ST BAY BLOTAYLAKESRD HUNTE PYBROADWAYK ST E PALOMAR S THILLTOP DR D ST 01ST AV MOSS ST LAMEDI ARD PALOMAR ST05TH AV NAPLES ST TE L E GRAPH CA NYONRD ANITA ST 02ND AV E L ST E NAPLES S T ORANGE AV G ST C ST HERI T A G E R DLANEAVP R O C TORVALLEYRD PA S EOLADERA B O N IT A RDCLUB H O U S E D R E I ST EORA N G E A VE OXFORD S T FLOWER S T S RANCHO D E L R E Y PY N R A NCHODELREYPY PASEO D E LREYWUE STERDN 0 2 N D A VN G REEN S V IEWD R E X P L O RATIONFALLSDRCREST DRE F L O W E R S T E PALOMAR D R 01ST AV E H ST W U E S T E R D02ND AV K ST G ST 05TH AVI ST PROCTOR VALLEY RD BAY BL C ST ANITA STANITA ST HERITAGE RDWUESTE RDSAN DIEGO S.D. COUNTY CORONADO NATIONAL CITY SAN DIEGO IMPERIAL BEACH S.D. COUNTY LANDFILL S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY 255115 117 113 114 116 118 173 135 150 128 (112)83(112)80 (113)68 (106)28 (114)73 (113)89 (103)41 (117)94 (117)90 (117)91 (109)31 (114)72 (113)71 (109)55 (108)54 (108)53 (105)24 (113)70 (109)58 (109)56 (106)32 (105)26 (105)25 (106)27 (123)22 (103)23 (113)69(108)52 (109)51(105)40 (108)79 (103)17 (108)49 (108)50(105)39 (104)38(123)20 (110)81 (108)84(108)82 (111)63 (111)85 (102)11 (102)12 (110)77(102)13 (110)78 (108)44(104)33 (123)15 (104)37 (108)48 (108)47(104)36 (123)16 (123)21 (111)86 (112)67 (112)66 (112)65 (123)19 (123)18 (108)46(104)35 (108)64 (104)34 (107)45 (107)43 (118)98 (108)93 (116)99 (125)125 (121)143 (117)286 (114)219 (103)281 (103)280 (117)278 (113)260 (120)217 (120)213 (106)136 (120)121 (117)104 (125)126 (117)105 (117)103 (116)154 (103)146 (125)127 (117)168 (116)110 (125)124 (105)192 (107)149 (115)108 (121)107 (125)142 (117)287 (124)221 (116)102 (120)112 (122)284 (121)263 (121)266 (121)267 (122)244 (124)271(124)270 (128)268 (128)269 (122)259 (122)257(122)256(122)262(122)261 (122)251 (121)248 (121)247 (122)245 (122)243 (122)233 (122)222 (124)253 (124)220 (121)250 (125)228 (103)254 (127)246 (121)224 (121)225 (121)241 (121)240 (121)239 (122)236(122)235 (128)234 (127)229 (121)226 (124)223 (118)218 (120)216 (128)214 (127)139 (118)165 (118)170 (118)174 (118)163 (118)162 (118)141 (118)169 (118)172 (118)183(118)182 (124)179 (124)178 (124)152 (118)171 (118)161 (118)153 (118)147 (118)144 (126)132 (126)131 (126)129 (116)100 (116)101 (126)140 (126)133 (127)167 (128)177 (124)164 (124)145 (128)181 (124)148 (127)138 (127)137 (124)158 (124)157(124)123(120)120 (115)159 (118)199 (116)197 (124)195 (128)202 (128)203 (128)201 (118)189 (124)211 (101)206(118)190 (128)200 (128)185 (128)204 (128)196 (116)193 (128)194 (128)186 (128)205 (124)191 (124)187 (124)208 (124)188 (124)184 EASTLAKE PY EAS T L A K E P Y BIRCH RD INDUSTR IAL BLBRANDYWINE AVBONITA R D MT M I G U E L R D FLOWER ST PASEO RANCHEROMEDICAL CENTER DRSAN MIGUEL RANCH RD N 04TH AVTIERRA DEL REYARTISAN ST 03RD AVE 07TH STE NAPLES CT HERITAGE RD MAIN STMAIN ST 03RD AV 119 (115)92 (106)29 (109)57(103)30 (114)75 (114)74 (114)76 (114)59 (113)88 (115)87 (110)61 (110)60 (102)14 (115)95 (110)62 (107)42 (118)96 (118)97 (122)265 (122)283 (122)285(122)288 (109)279 (116)109 (121)106 (102)151 (122)282 (128)273 (121)264 (122)237 (122)238 (122)252 (128)258 (121)227 (128)215 (121)242 (127)230 (118)156 (118)166 (124)176 (124)175 (126)130 (120)122 (126)111 (124)155 (124)134 (124)160 (122)207 (128)209 (121)198 Figure 5-2 Phase 2 Improvements Legend ###System Control Number (###)Communication Number !(Existing Traffic Signal !(Offline Existing Traffic Signal !ªTraffic Signal Controller Upgrade !(³¸Traffic Signal Controller Upgrade and CCTV New Fiber in Existing COMM Conduit New Fiber in New Conduit New Fiber in Existing Copper Conduit City of Chula Vista ñ City Hall Priority Corridor Road Way Classification 4 Lane Major 6 Lane Major # #6 Lane Prime ^^^Class 1 Collector """"Commercial Boulevard (4 Lane) ® ® ®Downtown Promenade (2/4 Lane) ===Expressway (7 or 8 Lane) YYYY Gateway Street (4 Lane) XXXXX Gateway Street (6 Lane) Other Roads ! ! ! !Urban Arterial (4 Lane)0 0.5 10.25 Miles Document Path: S:\Projects\Chula Vista\0347_Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan\04 Design\GIS\MXD Files\Chula Vista Comm MP Phase Implementation.mxd/ 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 405 (###) (###) (###) (###) ### ### ### ### ### ñ !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$508 !"#$508 !"#$508 ·|}þ54·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 E H ST E J ST MAIN ST 04TH AVI ST OLYMPIC PYH ST03RD AV J ST E ST L ST F ST BAY BLOTAYLAKESRD HUNTE PYBROADWAYK ST E PALOMAR S THILLTOP DR D ST 01ST AV MOSS ST LAMEDI ARD PALOMAR ST05TH AV NAPLES ST TE L E GRAPH CA NYONRD ANITA ST 02ND AV E L ST E NAPLES S T ORANGE AV G ST C ST HERI T A G E R DLANEAVP R O C TORVALLEYRD PA S EOLADERA B O N IT A RDCLUB H O U S E D R E I ST EORA N G E A VE OXFORD S T FLOWER S T S RANCHO D E L R E Y PY N R A NCHODELREYPY PASEOD E LREYWUE STERDN 0 2 N D A VN GREEN S V IEWD R E X P L O RATIONFALLSDRCREST DRE F L O W E R S T E PALOMAR D R 01ST AV E H ST W U E S T E R D02ND AV K ST G ST 05TH AVI ST PROCTOR VALLEY RD BAY BL C ST ANITA STANITA ST HERITAGE RDWUESTE RDSAN DIEGO S.D. COUNTY CORONADO NATIONAL CITY SAN DIEGO IMPERIAL BEACH S.D. COUNTY LANDFILL S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY 255 115 117 113 114 116 118 173 135 150 128 (112)83(112)80 (113)68 (106)28 (114)73 (113)89 (103)41 (117)94 (117)90 (117)91 (109)31 (114)72 (113)71 (109)55 (108)54 (108)53 (105)24 (113)70 (109)58 (109)56 (106)32 (105)26 (105)25 (106)27 (123)22 (103)23 (113)69(108)52 (109)51(105)40 (108)79 (103)17 (108)49 (108)50(105)39 (104)38(123)20 (110)81 (108)84(108)82 (111)63 (111)85 (102)11 (102)12 (110)77(102)13 (110)78 (108)44(104)33 (123)15 (104)37 (108)48 (108)47(104)36 (123)16 (123)21 (111)86 (112)67 (112)66 (112)65 (123)19 (123)18 (108)46(104)35 (108)64 (104)34 (107)45 (107)43 (118)98 (108)93 (116)99 (125)125 (121)143 (117)286 (114)219 (103)281 (103)280 (117)278 (113)260 (120)217 (120)213 (106)136 (120)121 (117)104 (125)126 (117)105 (117)103 (116)154 (103)146 (125)127 (117)168 (116)110 (125)124 (105)192 (107)149 (115)108 (121)107 (125)142 (117)287 (124)221 (116)102 (120)112 (122)284 (121)263 (121)266 (121)267 (122)244 (124)271(124)270 (128)268 (128)269 (122)259 (122)257(122)256(122)262(122)261 (122)251 (121)248 (121)247 (122)245 (122)243 (122)233 (122)222 (124)253 (124)220 (121)250 (125)228 (103)254 (127)246 (121)224 (121)225 (121)241 (121)240 (121)239 (122)236(122)235 (128)234 (127)229 (121)226 (124)223 (118)218 (120)216 (128)214 (127)139 (118)165 (118)170 (118)174 (118)163 (118)162 (118)141 (118)169 (118)172 (118)183(118)182 (124)179 (124)178 (124)152 (118)171 (118)161 (118)153 (118)147 (118)144 (126)132 (126)131 (126)129 (116)100 (116)101 (126)140 (126)133 (127)167 (128)177 (124)164 (124)145 (128)181 (124)148 (127)138 (127)137 (124)158 (124)157(124)123(120)120 (115)159 (118)199 (116)197 (124)195 (128)202 (128)203 (128)201 (118)189 (124)211 (101)206(118)190 (128)200 (128)185 (128)204 (128)196 (116)193 (128)194 (128)186 (128)205 (124)191 (124)187 (124)208 (124)188 (124)184 EASTLAKE PY EAS T L A K E P Y BIRCH RD INDUSTR IAL BLBRANDYWINE AVBONITA R D MT M I G U E L R D FLOWER ST PASEO RANCHEROMEDICAL CENTER DRSAN MIGUEL RANCH RD N 04TH AVTIERRA DEL REYARTISAN ST 03RD AVE 07TH STE NAPLES CT HERITAGE RD MAIN STMAIN ST 03RD AV 119 (115)92 (106)29 (109)57(103)30 (114)75 (114)74 (114)76 (114)59 (113)88 (115)87 (110)61 (110)60 (102)14 (115)95 (110)62 (107)42 (118)96 (118)97 (122)265 (122)283 (122)285(122)288 (109)279 (116)109 (121)106 (102)151 (122)282 (128)273 (121)264 (122)237 (122)238 (122)252 (128)258 (121)227 (128)215 (121)242 (127)230 (118)156 (118)166 (124)176 (124)175 (126)130 (120)122 (126)111 (124)155 (124)134 (124)160 (122)207 (128)209 (121)198 Figure 5-3 Phase 3 Improvements Legend ###System Control Number (###)Communication Number !(Existing Traffic Signal !(Offline Existing Traffic Signal !(³¸Traffic Signal Upgrade and CCTV City of Chula Vista ñ City Hall 0 0.5 10.25 Miles Document Path: S:\Projects\Chula Vista\0347_Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan\04 Design\GIS\MXD Files\Chula Vista Comm MP Phase Implementation.mxd/ 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 406 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 58 5.4 Cell Towers The City owns cell towers throughout Chula Vista that may be utilized for the traffic systems communications network. The implementation phasing plan does not consider use of the towers and focuses on cable based and point to point wireless communications. The towers may provide opportunities to reach areas not easily accessible by cable based systems. The towers could host broadband wireless and/or cellular radios to close gaps in City-owned infrastructure and/or support future ITS technology applications. Tower use would be determined on a case-by-case basis in engineering design phases. 5.5 Long-Term System ConsideraƟons Additional long-term system considerations are included to provide a more robust and reliable traffic signal communication network. These improvements are not part of the three-phase implementation plan but are recommended should additional funding become available. As opportunities arise, new fiber optic conduit and cable should be installed in place of broadband Ethernet wireless radios and fiber optic communication media should be installed in addition to the City-owned copper plant. Major signalized intersections should be upgraded to include stand-alone battery back-up systems, Global Positioning System (GPS) emergency vehicle preemption (EVP) systems, Ethernet-enabled conflict monitor units (CMU), and Power Cycle Relay Switches. Table 5-1 Long-Term System Improvement Order of Magnitude Costs IMPROVEMENT UNIT COST Trunk SMFOC Cable $5/LF Breakout SMFOC Cable $2/LF Fiber Optic Vault $2,500/Each Splice Closure $2,000/Each Fiber Distribution Unit $2,000/Each Standalone Battery Back-Up System $5,000 /Intersection GPS based Emergency Vehicle Preemption System $10,000 /Intersection Ethernet-Enabled Conflict Monitor Unit $1,000/Intersection Power Cycle Relay Switch $800/Intersection Adaptive Traffic Signal Deployment $25,000/Intersection 5.6 Fiber OpƟc CommunicaƟon Rings Topology Fiber optic conduit and cable will be installed during the various implementation plan phases to complete a redundant and self-healing fiber optic communication rings topology around the City. Primary rings, the fiber optic backbone of the communication network, will connect the TMC at City Hall to major roadways throughout Chula Vista including Eastlake Parkway, Fourth Avenue, H Street, L Street, Lane Avenue, Main Street, Olympic Parkway, Orange Avenue, Otay Lakes Road, Proctor Valley Road, and Telegraph Canyon 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 407 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 59 Road. A secondary ring will provide redundant and robust communications to the future Smart Bayfront area. Linear branches will connect the remaining traffic signals throughout the City to the fiber optic communications network via primary and/or secondary rings. Future development projects that include new traffic signal and roadway improvements should implement new fiber optic communications infrastructure and connect to the rings topology. Future fiber associated with planned development projects, as previously discussed in Section 3 should also connect to the rings topology and be implemented by the Developer per City guidance. The following recommendations are provided for all future fiber optic cable deployments, including existing conduit and new conduit installations: • Primary rings should be a minimum 144-strand of single-mode fiber optic cable. • Secondary ring should be a minimum 72-strand single-mode fiber optic cable. • Linear branches should be a minimum of 36-strand single-mode fiber optic cable. • Local drop connections, for fiber MFED connections, should be a 12-strand single-mode fiber optic cable. The fiber optic communications ring topology is depicted in Figure 5-4. Buildout of the future traffic systems communications network is summarized in Appendix F. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 408 (###) (###) (###) (###) ### ### ### ### ### ñ$+ $+ $+ $+ !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$508 !"#$508 !"#$508 ·|}þ54·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 E H ST E J ST MAIN ST 04TH AVI ST OLYMPIC PYH ST03RD AV J ST E ST L ST F ST BAY BLOTAYLAKESRD HUNTE PYBROADWAYK ST E PALOMAR S THILLTOP DR D ST 01ST AV MOSS ST LAMEDI ARD PALOMAR ST05TH AV NAPLES ST TE L E GRAPH CA NYONRD ANITA ST 02ND AV E L ST E NAPLES S T ORANGE AV G ST C ST HERI T A G E R DLANEAVPROCTOR VALLEY RD PA S EOLADERA B O N IT A RDCLUB H O U S E D R E I ST EORA N G E A VE OXFORD S T FLOWER S T S RANCHO D E L R E Y PY N R A NCHODELREYPY PASEOD E LREYWUE STERDN 0 2 N D A VN GREEN S V IEWD R E X P L O RATIONFALLSDRCREST DRE F L O W E R S T E PALOMAR D R E H ST W U E S T E R D 05TH AV K ST02ND AVHERITAGE RDI ST 01ST AVBAY BL G ST ANITA STANITA ST 03RD AVC ST WUESTE RDMAIN KJ HERITAGEMONTACETRIBUTARYMAIN W BS T R E E T " A "SR 125 S A N T A M A R I S O L ARI OTAY VALLEY U N I V E R S I T Y STREET "E"STREET "I"STREET "D"S A N T A D A V I S S A N T A T I PO DI S C O V E R Y F A L L S SA N T A M A C H E T O CAR AWA Y STREET "F"CALLE SWANS E A SOLS T ICE STREET "D"SR 125MAINSR 1 2 5 OTAY VALLEY MAIN SAN DIEGO S.D. COUNTY CORONADO NATIONAL CITY SAN DIEGO IMPERIAL BEACH S.D. COUNTY LANDFILL S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY 255 115 117 114 116 118 173 135 150 128 (112)83(112)80 (113)68 (106)28 (114)73 (113)89 (103)41 (117)94 (117)90 (117)91 (109)31 (114)72 (113)71 (109)55 (108)54 (108)53 (105)24 (113)70 (109)58 (109)56 (106)32 (105)26 (105)25 (106)27 (123)22 (103)23 (113)69(108)52 (109)51(105)40 (108)79 (103)17 (108)49 (108)50(105)39 (104)38(123)20 (110)81 (108)84(108)82 (111)63 (111)85 (102)11 (102)12 (110)77(102)13 (110)78 (108)44(104)33 (123)15 (104)37 (108)48 (108)47(104)36 (123)16 (123)21 (111)86 (112)67 (112)66 (112)65 (123)19 (123)18 (108)46(104)35 (108)64 (104)34 (107)45 (107)43 (118)98 (108)93 (116)99 (125)125 (121)143 (117)286 (114)219 (103)281 (103)280 (117)278 (113)260 (120)217 (120)213 (106)136 (120)121 (117)104 (125)126 (117)105 (117)103 (116)154 (103)146 (125)127 (117)168 (116)110 (125)124 (105)192 (107)149 (115)108 (121)107 (125)142 (117)287 (124)221 (116)102 (120)112 (122)284 (121)263 (121)266 (121)267 (122)244 (124)271(124)270 (128)268 (128)269 (122)257(122)256(122)262(122)261 (122)251 (121)248 (121)247 (122)245 (122)243 (122)233 (122)222 (124)253 (124)220 (121)250 (125)228 (103)254 (127)246 (121)224 (121)225 (121)242 (121)241 (121)240 (121)239 (122)236(122)235 (128)234 (127)229 (121)226 (124)223 (118)218 (120)216 (128)214 (127)139 (118)165 (118)170 (118)174 (118)163 (118)162 (118)141 (118)169 (118)172 (118)183(118)182 (124)179 (124)178 (124)152 (118)171 (118)161 (118)153 (118)147 (118)144 (126)132 (126)131 (126)129 (116)100 (116)101 (126)140 (126)133 (127)167 (128)177 (124)164 (124)145 (128)181 (124)148 (127)138 (127)137 (124)158 (124)157(124)123(120)120 (115)159 (118)199 (116)197 (124)195 (128)202 (128)203 (128)201 (118)189 (124)211 (101)206(118)190 (128)200 (128)185 (128)204 (128)196 (116)193 (128)194 (128)186 (128)205 (124)191 (124)187 (124)208 (124)188 (124)184 EASTLAKE PY EAS T L A K E P Y BIRCH RD INDUSTR IAL BL PROCTOR VALLEY RD BRANDYWINE AVBONITA R D MT M I G U E L R D FLOWER ST PASEO RANCHEROMEDICAL CENTER DRSAN MIGUEL RANCH RD N 04TH AVTIERRA DEL REYARTISAN ST 03RD AVE 07TH STE NAPLES CT MAIN ST HERITAGE RD MAIN ST 113 119 (115)92 (106)29 (109)57(103)30 (114)75 (114)74 (114)76 (114)59 (113)88 (115)87 (110)61 (110)60 (102)14 (115)95 (110)62 (107)42 (118)96 (118)97 (122)265 (122)283 (122)285(122)288 (109)279 (116)109 (121)106 (102)151 (122)282 (128)273 (121)264 (122)237 (122)238 (122)259 (122)252 (128)258 (121)227 (128)215 (127)230 (118)156 (118)166 (124)176 (124)175 (126)130 (120)122 (126)111 (124)155 (124)134 (124)160 (122)207 (128)209 (121)198 Figure 5-4 Fiber Optic Communication Rings Topology Legend ###System Control Number (###)Communication Number $+Layer 3 Communication Hub !(Existing Traffic Signal !(Offline Existing Traffic Signal !(Future Traffic Signal Primary Fiber Optic Ring Secondary Fiber Optic Ring Future Roads City of Chula Vista ñ City Hall 0 0.5 10.25 Miles Document Path: S:\Projects\Chula Vista\0347_Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan\04 Design\GIS\MXD Files\Chula Vista Comm MP Phase Implementation.mxd/ 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 409 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 61 5.7 Order of Magnitude Cost EsƟmate A summary of the costs for Master Plan deployment, organized by the implementation phase, is shown on the following tables. Table 5-2 Phase 1 Deployment Cost Estimate ITEM # DESCRIPTION TOTAL 1 Fiber Optic Communications System Conversion to Ethernet $187,500 2 Leased Copper Conversion to City-Owned Broadband Wireless and Connected City-Owned Copper Conversion to Ethernet $2,556,000 3 Leased Cellular Traffic Measurement Devices Conversion to City- Owned Broadband Wireless $558,750 4 CCTV Camera Video Monitoring at Priority Locations $336,000 5 Dynamic Message Signs $285,000 6 Satellite Maintenance Facility Traffic Management Center $111,300 7 Traffic Signal Controller Ethernet Conversion Upgrade $160,200 8 Communications Hub Installation $600,000 Grand Total $4,794,750 Table 5-3 Phase 2 Deployment Cost Estimate ITEM # DESCRIPTION TOTAL 1 Existing Communications Conduit Upgrade $1,374,375 2 Fiber Optic Communications Rings Topology $4,610,700 3 Traffic Signal Equipment Upgrade on Priority Corridors $1,107,000 Grand Total $7,092,075 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 410 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 62 Table 5-4 Phase 3 Deployment Cost Estimate ITEM # DESCRIPTION TOTAL 1 Traffic Signal Equipment Upgrade at Remaining Intersections $3,763,500 2 Video Detection Equipment Upgrade $186,000 Grand Total $3,949,500 Table 5-5 Deployment Cost Estimate by Phase PHASE TOTAL 1 $4,794,750 2 $7,092,075 3 $3,949,500 Grand Total $15,836,325 The order of magnitude cost estimate for the Master Plan implementation is $15,836,325. The quantities in the estimate were obtained using information from the GIS database and aerial photography. Quantities for conduit were increased by 10% and fiber optic cable by 25% to account for unknown factors. This cost includes a construction contingency of 25% and soft costs such as engineering, project management, and construction management. The breakdown for each phase and item number is included in Appendix E. The goal of the Master Plan is to provide a citywide fiber optic communications network with state-of-the- art traffic signal communications devices and systems. Financial constraints typically necessitate partial phase implementation. If funding is limited, the focus should start at the TMC and move outward. Intersections along major corridors should be prioritized first before implementing upgrades to intersections on less critical streets. 5.8 ConnecƟon to City FaciliƟes Establishing a citywide fiber optic traffic signal communication system provides opportunities to connect other facilities throughout the City. These include City Hall, police stations, fire stations, libraries, and parks. The facilities can be connected to the fiber optic network individually as the system expands to adjacent corridors and intersections. The integration of the facilities by phase are shown in Figure 5-6. A cost estimate for the deployment of facility connections is shown in Table 5-6 below. Table 5-6 Deployment Cost Estimate of Connection to City Facilities PHASE TOTAL 1 $80,850 2 $254,400 3 $641,400 Grand Total $976,650 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 411 # # # # (###) (###) (###) (###) ### ### ### ### ### ñ !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !H ²ï³ ²ï³ ²ï³!H!H!â ²ï³ !H !H ²ï³ !H ²ï³ !H ²ï³ !H ²ï³²ï³ !H ²ï³ !H²ï³ !H !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$508 !"#$508 !"#$508 ·|}þ54·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 2 2 2 1 3 1 E H ST E J ST MAIN ST04TH AVI ST OLYMPIC PYH ST03RD AV J ST E ST L ST F ST BAY BLOTAYLAKESRD HUNTEPYBROADWAYK ST E PALOMAR S THILLTOP DR D ST 01ST AV MOSS ST LAMEDI ARD PALOMAR ST05TH AV NAPLES ST TE L E GRAPH CA NYONRD ANITA ST 02ND AV E L ST E NAPLES S T ORANGE AV G ST C ST HERI T A G E R DLANEAVPROCTOR VALLEY RD PA S EOLADERAB O N IT A RDCLUB H O U S E D R E I ST EORA N G E A VE OXFORD S T FLOWER S T S RANCHO D E L R E Y PY N R A NCHODELREYPY PASEOD E LREYWU E STERDN 0 2 N D A VN GREEN S V IEW D R E X P L O RATIONFALLSDRCREST DRE F L O W E R S T E PALOMAR D R E H ST 05TH AV K ST02ND AVHERITAGE RDI ST 01ST AVBAY BL G ST ANITA STANITA ST 03RD AVC ST WUESTE RDMAIN KJ HERITAGEMONTACETRIBUTARYMAIN W BS T R E E T " A "SR 125 S A N T A M A R I S O L ARI OTAY VALLEY U N I V E R S I T Y STREET "E"STREET "I"STREET "D"S A N T A D A V I S S AN T A T I PO DI S C O V E R Y F A L L S SA N T A M A C H E T O CAR AW AY STREET "F"CALLE SWANS E A SOLS T ICE STREET "D"SR 125MAINSR 1 2 5 OTAY VALLEY MAIN SAN DIEGO S.D. COUNTY CORONADO NATIONAL CITY SAN DIEGO IMPERIAL BEACH S.D. COUNTY LANDFILL S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY 255 115 117 114 116 118 173 135 150 128 (112)83(112)80 (113)68 (106)28 (114)73 (113)89 (103)41 (117)94 (117)90 (117)91 (109)31 (114)72 (113)71 (109)55 (108)54 (108)53 (105)24 (113)70 (109)58 (109)56 (106)32 (105)26 (105)25 (106)27 (123)22 (103)23 (113)69(108)52 (109)51(105)40 (108)79 (103)17 (108)49 (108)50(105)39 (104)38(123)20 (110)81 (108)84(108)82 (111)63 (111)85 (102)11 (102)12 (110)77(102)13 (110)78 (108)44(104)33 (123)15 (104)37 (108)48 (108)47(104)36 (123)16 (123)21 (111)86 (112)67 (112)66 (112)65 (123)19 (123)18 (108)46(104)35 (108)64 (104)34 (107)45 (107)43 (118)98 (108)93 (116)99 (125)125 (121)143 (117)286 (114)219 (103)281 (103)280 (117)278 (113)260 (120)217 (120)213 (106)136 (120)121 (117)104 (125)126 (117)105 (117)103 (103)146 (125)127 (116)110 (125)124 (105)192 (107)149 (115)108 (121)107 (125)142 (117)287 (124)221 (116)102 (120)112 (121)263 (121)266 (121)267 (122)244 (124)271(124)270 (128)268 (128)269 (122)237 (122)257(122)256(122)262(122)261 (122)251 (121)248 (121)247 (122)245 (122)243 (122)233 (122)222 (124)253 (124)220 (121)250 (125)228 (103)254 (127)246 (121)224 (121)225 (121)242 (121)241 (121)240 (121)239 (122)236(122)235 (128)234 (127)229 (121)226 (124)223 (118)218 (120)216 (128)214 (127)139 (118)165 (118)170 (118)174 (118)163 (118)162 (118)141 (118)169 (118)172(118)182 (124)179 (124)178 (124)152 (118)171 (118)161 (118)153 (118)147 (118)144 (126)132 (126)131 (126)129 (116)100 (116)101 (126)140 (126)133 (127)167 (128)177 (124)164 (124)145 (128)181 (124)148 (127)138 (127)137 (124)158 (124)157(124)123(120)120 (115)159 (118)199 (116)197 (124)195 (128)202 (128)203 (128)201 (118)189 (124)211 (101)206(118)190 (128)200 (128)185 (128)204 (128)196 (116)193 (128)194 (128)186 (128)205 (124)191 (124)187 (124)208 (124)188 (124)184 3 3 3 2 EASTLAKE PY EAS T L A K E P Y BIRCH RD INDUSTR IAL BL PROCTOR VALLEY RD BRANDYWINE AVBONITA R D MT M I G U E L R D FLOWER ST PASEO RANCHEROMEDICAL CENTER DRSAN MIGUEL RANCH R D N 04TH AVTIERRA DEL REYARTISAN ST 03RD AVE 07TH STE NAPLES CT W U E S T E R D MAIN ST HERITAGE RD MAIN ST 113 119 (115)92 (106)29 (109)57(103)30 (114)75 (114)74 (114)76 (114)59 (113)88 (115)87 (110)61 (110)60 (102)14 (115)95 (110)62 (107)42 (118)96 (118)97 (122)265 (122)283 (122)285(122)288 (109)279 (116)154 (116)109 (117)168 (121)106 (102)151 (122)284 (122)282 (128)273 (121)264 (122)238 (122)259 (122)252 (128)258 (121)227 (128)215 (127)230 (118)156 (118)166 (118)183 (124)176 (124)175 (126)130 (120)122 (126)111 (124)155 (124)134 (124)160 (122)207 (128)209 (121)198 Figure 5-5 Communications System Extension per City Facilities Legend ###System Control Number (###)Communication Number#Implementation Phase Number !(Existing Traffic Signal !(Offline Existing Traffic Signal !(Future Traffic Signal !(Existing Caltrans Traffic Signal !(Future Caltrans Traffic Signal Existing Fiber Future Fiber Phase 2 New Fiber in Existing COMM Conduit Phase 2 New Fiber in New Conduit Phase 2 New Fiber in Existing Copper Conduit Future Roads City of Chula Vista ñ City Hall Facility Type ²ï³Fire Stations ²ï³Future Fire Stations !H City Park !H Government Offices & Civic Centers !â Police Station 0 0.5 10.25 Miles Document Path: S:\Projects\Chula Vista\0347_Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan\04 Design\GIS\MXD Files\Chula Vista Comm Phase Implementation Figures.mxd/!( !( !( !( ²ï³ !H !H !â !H ñ 1 F ST E ST 04TH AV05TH AV03RD AV (104)34 (107)45 (110)61 Civic Center / 0 500 1,000250Feet 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 412 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 64 5.9 Funding Sources The City of Chula Vista’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP) budget for traffic signal and street related projects is primarily supported by the Transportation Sales Tax (TransNet) and Gas Tax. The City’s Transportation Development Impact fees and Transportation grants from the Active Transportation Program (ATP) and Federal Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) also provide funding. Potential funding sources for the City’s Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan are identified in the following. 5.9.1 TransportaƟon Sales Tax (TransNet) Established in 1988, the Transportation Sales Tax (TransNet) is a half-cent sales tax collected by the State of California that is dedicated to transportation improvements in the San Diego region. The program was extended in 2008 for 40 years for $14 billion. The regional metropolitan planning agency, San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG), allocates funds to municipalities within San Diego County and supports highway, transit, and local street improvements. SANDAG administers funds, as determined by the SANDAG Board of Directors, based on the locally adopted Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), which is updated every three years1. Majority approval from the SANDAG Board of Directors and identification of need, as demonstrated in this document, is required to commit TransNet revenue for future deployment of Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan projects. 5.9.2 General Use Sales Tax Measure P, a temporary half-cent general use sales tax, was approved by voters in Chula Vista. The tax went into effect April 1, 2017 and is expected to generate about $160 million over a 10-year period to repair, replace, and update failing/obsolete City infrastructure including streets, storm drains, public safety equipment, and parks. The tax revenue will be part of the City’s General Fund and a citizen oversight committee will be responsible for annual spending plans, accounting, and advising2. 5.9.3 Gas Tax Voters approved Proposition 42, utilizing sales tax on fuel to provide funding for City street improvements. These funds have primarily served to augment the City’s annual pavement rehabilitation efforts but has also included street reconstruction projects3. 5.9.4 Development Impact Fees (DIF) Development Impact Fees (DIF) are collected to mitigate the impact of new development to maintain existing levels of services throughout the community. 5.9.4.1 Transportation Development Impact Fee (TDIF) The City of Chula Vista Transportation Development Impact Fee (TDIF) Program was established in 1988 and collects development impact fees to be used for constructing transportation facilities to accommodate increased traffic generated by new development within the City’s eastern territories4. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 413 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 65 5.9.4.2 Traffic Signal Fee The City’s Traffic Signal Fee is a trip-based development impact fee associated with the issuance of building permits for new construction. This fee can be utilized for the installation and upgrade of traffic signals throughout the City, including traffic signal modifications and pedestrian improvements5. 5.9.5 City General Funds/Capital Improvement Program The City of Chula Vista’s proposed budget for fiscal year (FY) 2017-2018 includes a CIP budget of $73,871,967 for capital improvement projects citywide. The forecasted five-year CIP program budget is estimated at $133,310,588. The FY 17/18 CIP budget is larger than typical due to Measure P funds. Table 5-7 provides a summary of forecasted CIP budgets6. However, the CIP budgets are subject to change based on new grant opportunities and/or additional Measure P funds. Table 5-7 FY 17/18-FY 21/22 Forecasted CIP Budget FY 17/18 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 TOTAL $73,871,967 $15,846,025 $16,265,806 $15,052,802 $12,273,988 $133,310,588 Roadway infrastructure is a major investment of the CIP funds with the bulk allocated to street repairs and other hardscape improvements. To achieve funding for the improvements identified by the Master Plan, a prioritization and recommendation for adoption in the next fiscal year CIP budget and/or as a reassignment of funds in the current fiscal year’s budget is necessary. 5.9.6 Grant OpportuniƟes Grant opportunities for various types of transportation and roadway related infrastructure improvements are available. The most applicable grants for funding the Master Plan improvements are as follows: 5.9.6.1 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funds The City receives annual Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds for community development activities, including capital improvement projects. The bulk of the funds are allotted to the completion of the Castle Park Infrastructure Projects however, approximately $300,000-$500,000 are available for other capital improvement projects, including roadway related projects, annually for the next 14 years 7. 5.9.6.2 Advanced Transportation and Congestion Management Technologies Deployment (ATCMTD) The Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act) established the Advanced Transportation and Congestion Management Technologies Deployment Grant Program to develop model deployment sites for large scale installation and operation of advanced transportation technologies. The goal of the program is to improve safety, efficiency, system performance, and infrastructure return-on-investment. Funds are obtained through the Highway Research and Development, Technology and Innovation Deployment, and Intelligent Transportation System Research Programs and $60 million dollars is authorized for each fiscal 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 414 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 66 year from 2016 to 2020. It is recommended that the City apply for future grant funding opportunities for innovative transportation technologies identified in the Master Plan that meet the required criteria8. 5.9.6.3 Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) The Map-21 Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) is a data-driven strategic approach to improving highway safety on all public roads. Performance-based, this program achieves a significant reduction in traffic fatalities and serious injuries on all public roadways. A highway safety improvement project is any strategy, activity, or project on a public road that is consistent with the data-driven State Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) and corrects or improves a hazardous road location or feature or addresses a highway safety problem9. It is recommended that the City apply for HSIP funding as improvements recommended in the Master Plan qualify for the grant. Also notable is the staff time required to apply for and administer the grant. Additionally, funding matches by the City may be required dependent on project improvements. 5.9.7 Assembly Bill 1447 Assembly Bill 1447 was passed on August 20, 2014 and clarifies that synchronization projects can qualify for money raised by the California Cap-and-Trade program, which seeks to cut greenhouse gas emissions. The carbon marketplace has generated approximately $5 billion in revenue since initiated in 201210. The Cap-and-Trade program money is held by the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund. The Master Plan improvements qualify for funding through this legislation with the recommended technology being proven to reduce Green House Gasses (GHG’s). As the process for administering these funds for traffic synchronization projects is determined, the City should present Master Plan improvements for funding. 5.9.8 Partnerships Rising demand for high speed communication has increased the rate of telecommunication installation and upgrades in both the public and private sectors. Utilizing partnerships with interested parties could advance the Master Plan build. Each entity is unique and the best approach to partnering will depend on the factors involved. 5.9.8.1 Public-Private Partnership As private companies and public agencies expand their telecommunication networks in Chula Vista, there may be opportunities for the City or private company to partner and cost share the installation and expansion of network infrastructure. The City should develop a policy to review planned installations of utilities within the City and cross reference the Master Plan for overlapping locations or additional routes for redundancy. It is important that the City maintain control over its facility. Maintenance access, expansion, and future allocations require as high a degree as possible of physical separation. Order of precedence for infrastructure installation through public-private partnerships is as follows: 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 415 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 67 • Install City-owned conduit, vaults, and cable. This is most desirable and most expensive and unless associated with new construction can be cost prohibitive. • Install separate cable in shared conduit and separate splice enclosures. • Install shared cable and for proper segregation and maintenance of the system the minimum granularity of fiber designated for City allocation should be 12 (a complete buffer tube). • If existing cable and limited fiber strands designate a minimum of 4 fibers for the City. • The least desirable arrangement is sharing the same fiber with non-City entities. Development projects should be conditioned to implement communication systems infrastructure as part of the overall facilities improvement requirements. This includes communications ducts, cable, splice vaults, and connectivity to City facilities. 5.9.8.1.1 Small Cell Networks The telecommunications industry is utilizing small cell networks to expand wireless carrier network coverage and increase capacity for both voice and data across new generation mobile phone technology and Wi-Fi networks. In comparison to traditional cell towers, small cell networks utilize smaller nodes that require lower power and cover smaller areas. Increased node density enables larger coverage areas with more capacity than a traditional cell tower can provide. Nodes are installed on existing infrastructure such as telephone poles or street lights and connected to a central hub by fiber optic cable. This provides local agencies with opportunities to partner with private companies and receive infrastructure improvements in exchange for furthering current telecommunications company pursuits. For example, an agency could allow installation of nodes on City-owned street lights and fiber optic cable in City right-of-way in exchange for City-owned conduit and fiber optic cable installed by the private company. Different agreements of different magnitudes, such as full-funding or shared-cost partnerships, can be made. Small cell network partnerships can provide a good opportunity for an agency to obtain needed infrastructure at reduced costs outside of the CIP process. 5.9.8.2 Public-Public Partnerships Like public-private partnerships there are opportunities to construct communications infrastructure through public-public partnerships. These would be interdepartmental projects within the City with Parks/ Recreation, Wastewater, IT, Police/Fire, and Public Works. These would also be regional or adjacent agency projects such as SANDAG, Caltrans, MTS, Port of San Diego, and the City of San Diego. Any construction that requires opening a trench in the public Right-of-Way is an opportunity for the City to have a conduit and vaults installed at no cost or a shared cost since the cost of construction is already incurred. Additionally, existing and future street lighting system conduit should also be considered for establishing communications to traffic signals, other City Departments, and/or for Smart City initiatives. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 416 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 68 5.10 Procurement and Delivery Methods The City of Chula Vista’s traffic signal communications system procurement choices impact deployment effectiveness and Return on Investment (ROI). Procurement and delivery methods include: best value procurement, design-bid-build, design-build, and system manager-integrator. The challenge associated with choosing the optimum procurement and delivery method lies in tailoring the specific work into bid packages and projects that achieve balance in technical complexity, system quality, cost savings, and deployment schedule. Many of the Master Plan systems are able to be deployed incrementally by system as well as all at once by a given area or group of areas. Contracting options are as follows: 5.10.1 Best Value Procurement The Best Value Procurement process includes an analysis of technical alternatives to identify potential new systems that flow into a set of system requirements, becoming a technical specification. These technical specifications are incorporated into the “best-value” bid packages for equipment procurement. This typically results in reduced pricing as vendors compete with one other for equipment purchase agreements directly with the agency rather than through a contractor. The best value bid packages and equipment purchase agreements enable rapid system procurement of desired elements, ultimately benefiting the schedule significantly in comparison to typical bid advertisement processes. The systems can be installed and integrated by agency staff, the agency’s on-call consultant firm, and/or a contract maintenance company11. 5.10.2 Design-Bid-Build Design–Bid–Build (D-B-B) is the traditional project delivery method where the agency contracts with separate entities for the design and construction of a project. The three main phases that occur sequentially during the D-B-B method include: design phase, bidding phase, and construction12. This delivery method can be used effectively to deploy physical Master Plan components such as communications infrastructure (conduit systems, fiber optic cable, pull boxes, etc.), foundations, and structure. However, it may not be suited for ITS projects involving software development, computer hardware, system integration, and system configuration. This method may be counterproductive for ITS applications as they cannot be effectively separated into design and construction services. The lowest bid may result in a contractor that is incapable of performing the required ITS-related services. 5.10.3 Design-Build The Design–Build (D–B) project delivery method includes the contract of design and construction services by a single entity known as the design-build contractor. This contrasts from the Design-Bid-Build project delivery method in that the Design-Build utilizes a single point of contract responsibility, minimizing risks for the project owner and reducing the delivery schedule by overlapping the design and construction phases of the project. One single contract is awarded to a design-build team who is responsible for13: • System engineering, design, and specifications. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 417 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 69 • Procurement and provision of all products, systems, and services. • Construction of all system elements. • Testing, inspection, and integration of various subsystems. Proceeding with the Design-Build project delivery method depends on agency policy and implementation timelines, and well-defined functional specifications. Project costs associated with D-B delivery method are typically higher due to the contractor taking on greater responsibility. This method may also result in engineering decisions being influenced by the builder in a contest of best design versus cost. 5.10.4 System Manager – Integrator The System Manager-Integrator (SM-I) delivery method includes a consultant, under an engineering and design services contract, that performs or oversees the performance of all system/project engineering, design, interface, integration, and configuration functions while one or more contractors, under a construction contract, performs all related construction activities. This project delivery method combines design and implementation of work components under one contract including: testing, integration, configuration, and procurement support. These components of work are the most complex and require advanced expertise but are typically small in terms of total project costs. The System Manager-Integrator services are procured based on qualifications which enables the agency to have a high degree of control through a single point of management 14. 5.11 Master Plan Cost and Benefit Analysis Implementation of the Master Plan is an investment in traffic systems technology that will improve traffic management, promote an environment for economic growth, and increase quality of life for Chula Vista residents. Implementation phasing costs, travel time, fuel, and emissions benefits were analyzed and a significant return on investment was identified. 5.11.1 Master Plan Costs The annual Master Plan investment is summarized by phase in Table 5-8 and on Figure 5-6. Phase 1 prioritizes City-owned communications infrastructure and ITS elements including CCTV cameras, fixed and portable CMS’s, and a Sattelite TMC at the City’s Traffic Signal Maintenance facility. Phase 2 upgrades twisted pair copper in existing conduit and wireless communications to fiber optic communications and upgrades priority corridors with the 2070 ATC controller platform and CCTV cameras. Phase 3 upgrades remaining signals to the 2070 ATC platform and converts analog video detection to Ethernet. ITS elements for Phase 3 also include CCTV cameras. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 418 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 70 Table 5-8 Master Plan Spending by Phase YEAR PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 3 TOTAL COMM’S ITS ELEMENTS COMM’S ITS ELEMENTS COMM’S ITS ELEMENTS 1 $1,354,150 $244,100 - - - - $1,598,250 2 $1,354,150 $244,100 - - - - $1,598,250 3 $1,354,150 $244,100 - - - - $1,598,250 4 - - $1,635,019 $138,000 - - $1,773,019 5 - - $1,635,019 $138,000 - - $1,773,019 6 - - $1,635,019 $138,000 - - $1,773,019 7 - - $1,635,019 $138,000 - - $1,773,019 8 - - - - $544,500 $772,000 $1,316,500 9 - - - - $544,500 $772,000 $1,316,500 10 - - - - $544,500 $772,000 $1,316,500 Subtotal $4,062,450 $732,300 $6,540,075 $552,000 $1,633,500 $2,316,000 - Total $4,794,750 $7,092,075 $3,949,500 $15,836,325 5.11.2 Master Plan Benefits Annual benefits for travel time, fuel consumption, and Carbon Monoxide emissions were estimated based on Phase 1 implementation. Table 5-9 below provides a summary of the annual Phase 1 monetary benefit saving in comparison with the annual Phase 1 implementation costs. Table 5-9 Phase 1 Benefit Summary (Per Year) # OF INT1 TT2 (HR) FUEL CON3 (GAL) CO EMISS4 (MT CO2E) TT SAVINGS5 FUEL SAVINGS6 CO EMISS SAVINGS7 PHASE 1 ANNUAL SAVINGS PHASE 1 ANNUAL COST BENEFIT : COST 267 -1.399M -34.223M -28,755 $764,107 $99.931M $3,306,769 $104.002M $1.598M 65 INT=Intersections, TT=Travel Time, CON=Consumption, EMISS=Emissions 1. Total number of intersections affected during Phase 1. 2. Hours spend in traffic in Chula Vista (46.2 hours per year per traveler) based on the INRIX 2016 Global Traffic Scorecard. 76% of the City’s population drives to work based on data from Zip Atlas. 15% typical improvement in travel time for synchronization per ITE Typical Savings. 3. Fuel saved per intersection of 7,835 gallons/day with 260 work week days based on Fuel Savings from Retiming for 140 traffic signals with existing coordination timing. Typical 12% reduction in fuel usage based on signal synchronization per ITE Typical Savings. 4. Average CO2e of 41,078 lbs per 200 signals based on average savings documented from LADOT and OCTA’s signal synchronization projects. 5. Travel Time savings of $16.79/hour of person travel based on 2015 Urban Mobility Report per Texas A&M Transportation Institute. 6. Fuel Consumption savings of $2.92 based on CA State average cost/gallon of gasoline and diesel per US Energy Information Administration. 7. CO emissions savings of $115/ton based on Highway Economic Requirements System Technical Report per US Department of Transportation. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 419 $1,354,150 $1,354,150 $1,354,150 $1,635,019 $1,635,019 $1,635,019 $1,635,019 $544,500 $544,500 $544,500 $244,100 $244,100 $244,100 $138,000 $138,000 $138,000 $138,000 $772,000 $772,000 $772,000 $0 $200,000 $400,000 $600,000 $800,000 $1,000,000 $1,200,000 $1,400,000 $1,600,000 $1,800,000 $2,000,000 12345678910 YEARS CHARTTITLE Communications ITSElements S:\Projects\Chula Vista\0347_Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan\06 Excel-Calcs\Cost Benefits AnalysisFigure 5-6 Annual Master Plan Investment by Phase2017-09-12 Agenda PacketPage 420 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 72 5.11.3 Cost EffecƟveness Based on the cost-effectiveness methodology presented above, the resulting annual benefit-cost ratio for implementing Phase 1 is 65:1. This indicates that improvements would yield benefits of $65 dollars for every $1 dollar spent. With cost savings exceeding the State and National benefit-cost ratio range of 20 to 60:1 ROI for Phase 1 alone, the monetary investments identified in the Master Plan are poised to be recaptured many times over for both economic and social benefit. 5.11.4 Master Plan Maintenance The Master Plan maps should be kept updated every 6 months to reflect changes in the system topology and architecture. This will require transfer of the GIS files developed for the Master Plan and coordination with the City’s Information Technology Services GIS group. A full review and update of the Master Plan should take place every 5 years as an addendum to the original document. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 421 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 73 6 References Executive Summary • 1: City of Chula Vista GIS Shapefiles, City of Chula Vista, March 2016 • 2: Chula Vista Bayfront Roadway Plan, City of Chula Vista, June 2016 Chula Vista Main Street Streetscape Master Plan, City of Chula Vista, September 2015 Otay Ranch Villages Sectional Planning Area Plans, City of Chula Vista, 2016 • 3: City of Chula Vista Private Line Service Billing, AT&T, July 2016 1. Introduction • 1: Largest Cities in San Diego County by Population, United States Census Bureau, 2010 • 2: Land Area in Square Miles, United States Census Bureau, 2010 • 3: Largest Cities in San Diego County by Population, United States Census Bureau 2010 Census, 2010 • 4: List of Largest California Cities by Population, United States Census Bureau, July 2014 • 5: Chula Vista Bayfront Master Plan Website, Port of San Diego, 2017 • 6: Smart City Chula Vista, City of Chula Vista, February 2016 • 7: “Chula Vista Launches ACT Chula Vista” News Article, July 2014 • 8: About ITS Standards: Systems Engineering, United States Department of Transportation Office of the Assistant Secretary for Research and Technology Intelligent Transportation Systems Joint Program Office • 9: San Diego Regional Intelligent Transportation Systems Strategic Plan, San Diego Association of Governments, August 2011 • 10: SANDAG 2050 Regional Transportation Plan, San Diego Association of Governments, October 2011 • 11: California Strategic Highway Safety Plan, Office of Traffic Safety, 2013 • 12: California Local Roadway Safety Manual, United States Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration, April 2013 • 13: About ITS Standards: National ITS Architecture, United States Department of Transportation Office of the Assistant Secretary for Research and Te chnology Intelligent Transportation Systems Joint Program Office 2. Existing Systems Assessment • 1: City of Chula Vista Private Line Service Billing, AT&T, July 2016 • 2: City Hall Building Plans, City of Chula Vista, April 2016 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 422 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 74 • 3: Evaluation Report: Adaptive Traffic Control System Using SCATS, City of Chula Vista, March 2016 • 4: SCATS Network Layout Report, City of Chula Vista, March 2016 • 5: South Bay Rapid Fact Sheet, San Diego Association of Governments, August 2016 • 6: Traffic Engineering, City of Chula Vista Public Works Department Engineering Website, 2017 • 7: Traffic Operations, City of Chula Vista Public Works Department Operations Website, 2017 3. Needs Assessment • 1: City Traffic Signal Infrastructure and Devices Records Research, City of Chula Vista, 2016 • 2: Chula Vista Bayfront Roadway Plan, City of Chula Vista, June 2016 • 3: Chula Vista Main Street Streetscape Master Plan, City of Chula Vista, September 2015 • 4: Otay Ranch Villages Sectional Planning Area Plans, City of Chula Vista, 2016 • 5: Installation of Adaptive Traffic Control System RFB, City of Chula Vista, August 2016 4. Future System Architecture and ITS Elements • 1: Bandwidth for IP Video Surveillance Systems, IPVM, January 2017 • 2: Region Chosen As Autonomous Vehicle Proving Ground, San Diego Association of Governments, January 2017 • 3: The San Diego Region – A Proposed Designated Automated Vehicle Proving Grounds, San Diego Association of Governments, December 2016 • 4: The AASHTO National Connected Vehicle SPaT Deployment Challenge, United States Department of Transportation’s National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, December 2016 • 5: SPaT Challenge Folio: Quick Facts and Message, National Operations of Excellence, 2017 • 6: Personal Signal Assistant, Traffic Technology Services, 2017 • 7: V2If Device Technology and Innovations, Connected Signals, 2017 • 8: San Diego to Deploy World’s Largest City-Based ‘Internet of Things’ Platform Using Smart Streetlights, City of San Diego, February 2017 • 9: Providing Emerging ITS Data to the Public Webinar, United States Department of Transportation Intelligent Transportation Systems Joint Program Office, 2017 5. Implementation Phasing Plan • 1: About TransNet, TransNet Keep San Diego Moving, 2017 • 2: San Diego Registrar of Voters, Measure P, September 2016 • 3: California Proposition 42 Allocation of Gas Tax Revenues, Ballotpedia, March 2002 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 423 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 75 • 4: City of Chula Vista Proposed Budget Fiscal Year 2017-2018, City of Chula Vista, 2017 • 5: City of Chula Vista Proposed Budget Fiscal Year 2017-2018, City of Chula Vista, 2017 • 6: City of Chula Vista Proposed Budget Fiscal Year 2017-2018, City of Chula Vista, 2017 • 7: City of Chula Vista Proposed Budget Fiscal Year 2017-2018, City of Chula Vista, 2017 • 8: Federal Highway Administration Advanced Transportation and Congestion Management Technologies Deployment Fact Sheet, United States Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration, February 2017 • 9: Highway Safety Improvements Program, Caltrans, April 2017 • 10: Summary of Auction Proceeds, California Air Resources Board, June 2017 • 11: Best Value in Government Procurement: Concepts and Practices, NIGP Institute for Public Procurement, 2013 • 12: Best Value in Government Procurement: Concepts and Practices, NIGP Institute for Public Procurement, 2013 • 13: Best Value in Government Procurement: Concepts and Practices, NIGP Institute for Public Procurement, 2013 • 14: Implementation and Operation, National Transportation Library, April 1994 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 424 APPENDIX A EXISTING TRAFFIC SYSTEMS TOPOLOGY AND FUTURE IMPROVEMENTS OPPORTUNITY AREAS 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 425 (###) (###) (###) (###) ### ### ### ### ### # # # # # # # # ## # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # ## # # # # # # # # ## # # # ### # # # # # # #### # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # ##### # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # ## # # #### # # # ## # ## # # # # # # # # # ## ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!ñ XY XY XY XY XY XYXY XYXY XY XY XY XY XY XY XY XY XYXY XY XY XY XY XY XYXY XY XY XY XYXYXY XY XYXYXY XY XY XY XY XYXY XYXYXY XY !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( ") ") ")") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ")") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ")") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ")") ") ") ") ") ") ")") ") ") ")") ") ") #* #* #*#*#*#*#*#* #*#* #* #* #*#*#*#*#*#*#* #* #* #* #* #*#* #*#*#* #* #*#* ") ") !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$508 !"#$508 ·|}þ54·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 E H ST E J ST MAIN ST 04TH AVI ST OLYMPIC PYH ST03RD AV J ST E ST L ST F ST BAY BLOTAYLAKESRD HUNTE PYBROADWAYK ST E PALOMAR S THILLTOP DR D ST 01ST AV MOSS ST LAMEDI ARD PALOMAR ST05TH AV NAPLES ST TE L E GRAPH CA NYONRD ANITA ST 02ND AV E L ST E NAPLES S T ORANGE AV G ST C ST HERI T A G E R DLANEAVPROCTOR VALLEY RD PA S EOLADERA B O N IT A RDCLUB H O U S E D R E I ST EORA N G E A VE OXFORD S T FLOWER S T S RANCHO D E L R E Y PY N R A NCHODELREYPY PASEO D E LREYWUE STERDN 0 2 N D A VN G REEN S V IEWD R E X P L O RATIONFALLSDRCREST DRE F L O W E R S T E PALOMAR D R E H ST W U E S T E R D 05TH AV K ST02ND AVHERITAGE RDI ST 01ST AVBAY BL G ST ANITA STANITA ST 03RD AVC ST WUESTE RDMAIN KJ HERITAGEMONTACETRIBUTARYMAIN W BS T R E E T " A "SR 125 S A N T A M A R I S O L ARI OTAY VALLEY U N I V E R S I T Y STREET "E"STREET "I"STREET "D"S A N T A D A V I S S A N T A T I PO DI S C O V E R Y F A L L S SA N T A M A C H E T O CAR AWA Y STREET "F"CALLE SWANS E A SOLS T ICE STREET "D"SR 125MAINSR 1 2 5 OTAY VALLEY MAIN SAN DIEGO S.D. COUNTY CORONADO NATIONAL CITY SAN DIEGO IMPERIAL BEACH S.D. COUNTY LANDFILL S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY 255115 117 114 116 118 173 135 150 128 (112)83(112)80 (113)68 (106)28 (114)73 (113)89 (103)41 (117)94 (117)90 (117)91 (109)31 (114)72 (113)71 (109)55 (108)54 (108)53 (105)24 (113)70 (109)58 (109)56 (106)32 (105)26 (105)25 (106)27 (123)22 (103)23 (113)69(108)52 (109)51(105)40 (108)79 (103)17 (108)49 (108)50(105)39 (104)38(123)20 (110)81 (108)84(108)82 (111)63 (111)85 (102)11 (102)12 (110)77(102)13 (110)78 (108)44(104)33 (123)15 (104)37 (108)48 (108)47(104)36 (123)16 (123)21 (111)86 (112)67 (112)66 (112)65 (123)19 (123)18 (108)46(104)35 (108)64 (104)34 (107)45 (107)43 (118)98 (108)93 (116)99 (125)125 (121)143 (117)286 (114)219 (103)281 (103)280 (117)278 (113)260 (120)217 (120)213 (106)136 (120)121 (117)104 (125)126 (117)105 (117)103 (116)154 (103)146 (125)127 (117)168 (116)110 (125)124 (105)192 (107)149 (115)108 (121)107 (125)142 (117)287 (124)221 (116)102 (120)112 (122)284 (121)263 (121)266 (121)267 (122)244 (124)271(124)270 (128)268 (128)269 (122)257(122)256(122)262(122)261 (122)251 (121)248 (121)247 (122)245 (122)243 (122)233 (122)222 (124)253 (124)220 (121)250 (125)228 (103)254 (127)246 (121)224 (121)225 (121)242 (121)241 (121)240 (121)239 (122)236(122)235 (128)234 (127)229 (121)226 (124)223 (118)218 (120)216 (128)214 (127)139 (118)165 (118)170 (118)174 (118)163 (118)162 (118)141 (118)169 (118)172 (118)183(118)182 (124)179 (124)178 (124)152 (118)171 (118)161 (118)153 (118)147 (118)144 (126)132 (126)131 (126)129 (116)100 (116)101 (126)140 (126)133 (127)167 (128)177 (124)164 (124)145 (128)181 (124)148 (127)138 (127)137 (124)158 (124)157(124)123(120)120 (115)159 (118)199 (116)197 (124)195 (128)202 (128)203 (128)201 (118)189 (124)211 (101)206(118)190 (128)200 (128)185 (128)204 (128)196 (116)193 (128)194 (128)186 (128)205 (124)191 (124)187 (124)208 (124)188 (124)184 EASTLAKE PY EAS T L A K E P Y BIRCH RD INDUSTR IAL BL PROCTOR VALLEY RD BRANDYWINE AVBONITA R D MT M I G U E L R D FLOWER ST PASEO RANCHEROMEDICAL CENTER DRSAN MIGUEL RANCH RD N 04TH AVTIERRA DEL REYARTISAN ST 03RD AVE 07TH STE NAPLES CT MAIN ST HERITAGE RD MAIN ST 113 119 (115)92 (106)29 (109)57(103)30 (114)75 (114)74 (114)76 (114)59 (113)88 (115)87 (110)61 (110)60 (102)14 (115)95 (110)62 (107)42 (118)96 (118)97 (122)265 (122)283 (122)285(122)288 (109)279 (116)109 (121)106 (102)151 (122)282 (128)273 (121)264 (122)237 (122)238 (122)259 (122)252 (128)258 (121)227 (128)215 (127)230 (118)156 (118)166 (124)176 (124)175 (126)130 (120)122 (126)111 (124)155 (124)134 (124)160 (122)207 (128)209 (121)198 City of Chula VistaTraffic Signal Communications Master PlanExisting Traffic Systems Topology and Future Improvements Opportunity Areas Legend ###System Control Number (###)Communication Number ")Telephone Drop Traffic Signal ")Offline Telephone Drop Traffic Signal #*Existing Adaptive Traffic Signal #*Future Adaptive Traffic Signal !(Existing Traffic Signal !(Offline Existing Traffic Signal !(Future Traffic Signal !(Existing Caltrans Traffic Signal !(Future Caltrans Traffic Signal XY Traffic Measurement Device #Ç City-Owned Wireless Towers #Private Wireless Towers Existing Copper Future Copper ! !Existing Wireless Traffic Interconnect ! !Future Wireless Traffic Interconnect Existing Fiber Future Fiber Existing Empty Conduit MTS Fiber Caltrans Fiber City of San Diego Fiber Port of San Diego Fiber Future Port of San Diego Fiber Future Roads Future Roadway Widening City of Chula Vista ñ City Hall 0 0.5 10.25 Miles Document Path: S:\Projects\Chula Vista\0347_Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan\04 Design\GIS\MXD Files\Chula Vista Comm MP (10.3).mxd/ 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 426 APPENDIX B EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGNAL COMMUNICATIONS ARCHITECTURE 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 427 City o f Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Existing Traffic System Communications Network Topology 0347 EX TS Communications Architecture.vsdx4WIRE Drop Address: 22 211 La Media/Santa Venetia EIA 232 MODEMMODEM 4WIRE Drop Address: 22 211 La Media/Santa Venetia EIA 232 MODEM Drop Address: 12 165 Concord/Olympic Drop Address: 12 165 Concord/Olympic Drop Address: 11 163 Oleander/Olympic Drop Address: 11 163 Oleander/Olympic EIA 232 MODEM EIA 232 Regional Arterial Management System (RAMS) Server QuickNet Fire Wall City Router TSCC T1 District 11 TMC T R T R ISA Bus16 port Digiboard COM 101 16 port Digiboard COM 132 City Network (Frame Relay) T1 T1 City #14 City #01 T1 SINGLEMODE FIBER CABLE SCATS Server EIA 232 EIA 232 EIA 232 EIA 232 EIA 232 EIA 232 East H/South Western CollegeEIA 232EIA 232STAR CommDial Up ModemSTAR CommDial Up ModemSTAR CommDial Up ModemSTAR CommDial Up ModemDial Out Call AZTEC SM 410 STATISTICAL MULTIPLEXERAZTEC SM 410 STATISTICAL MULTIPLEXEREIA 232 Dial IN CallAuto Answer ModemAZTEC SM 410 STATISTICAL MULTIPLEXERAZTEC SM 410 STATISTICAL MULTIPLEXERSCATS 119 Auburn/ East H SCATS 173 Apache/ Miracosta/Otay Lakes SCATS Drop Address: 3 128 La Media/Otay Lakes/Tele Cyn 619 422-9591 RAMS WORKSTATION SCATS WORKSTATION 16 port Digiboard COM 121: 19 DROPS COM 127: 7 DROPS Dial IN Call COM 118: 24 DROPS COM 125: 6 DROPS COM 126: 7 DROPS Auto Answer Modem 619 426-0825 Master 10 AT&T DACS COM 101: 6 DROPS Drop Address: 20 206 Magdalena/Santa Venetia Drop Address: 1 001 Test Controller 1 Drop Address: 2 002 Test Controller 2 Drop Address: 3 003 Test Controller 3 Drop Address: 4 004 Test Controller 4 Drop Address: 5 005 Test Controller 5 Modem 4 WIRE Copper Multi-Drop LineTX RX 4WIRE 4WIRE AT&T DACSCOM 102: 5 DROPS Modem Drop Address: 3 011 E/Woodlawn Drop Address: 2 013 Broadway/D Drop Address: 4 014 Broadway/E Drop Address: 5 151 Broadway/Flower Drop Address: 1 012 Broadway/C 4 WIRE Copper Multi-Drop LineCOM 103: 8 DROPS Drop Address: 7 280 Industrial/Moss Drop Address: 8 281 Industrial/Naples Drop Address: 1 017 H/Woodlawn Drop Address: 2 030 Anita/Broadway Drop Address: 3 041 5th/Palomar Drop Address: 5 146 Date/Main/Otay Valley Drop Address: 4 254 Brandywine/Sequoia TX RX 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE Modem Drop Address: 6 023 Industrial/L AT&T DACS 4WIRE 4WIRE TX RX AT&T DACSCOM 104: 6 DROPS Modem Drop Address: 1 033 5th/E Drop Address: 2 034 5th/F Drop Address: 3 035 5th/G Drop Address: 4 036 5th/H Drop Address: 5 037 5th/I Drop Address: 6 038 5th/J 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE TX RX 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE COM 105: 6 DROPS Modem Drop Address: 4 024 Broadway/Mos s Drop Address: 5 025 Broadway/Naples Drop Address: 6 026 Broadway/Oxford Drop Address: 1 039 5th/K Drop Address: 2 040 5th/L Drop Address: 3 192 1st/Palomar Drop Address: 4 024 Broadway/Mos s Drop Address: 5 025 Broadway/Naples Drop Address: 6 026 Broadway/Oxford Drop Address: 1 039 5th/K Drop Address: 2 040 5th/L Drop Address: 3 192 1st/Palomar AT&T DACS TX RX COM 106: 5 DROPS Modem Drop Address: 5 032 Orange/Palomar AT&T DACS 4 WIRE Copper Multi-Drop Line Drop Address: 3 029 Broadway/Palomar 4WIRE Drop Address: 1 027 Industrial/Palomar Drop Address: 4 028 Palomar/Trolley Station Drop Address: 6 136 Palomar/Trolley Center 4 WIRE SELF - HEALING FIBER RING 1 Drop Address: 3 042 4 th/C Drop Address: 2 043 4th/D Drop Address: 4 045 4 th/F Drop Address: 5 149 4 th/Brisbane T R EIA 232 T R T R EIA 232 T R T R EIA 232 T R T R T R T EIA 232 R T R ifs Modem ifs Modem ifs Modem ifs Modem ifs Modem 4 WIRE SELF- HEALING FIBER RING 2T R EIA 232 T R T R EIA 232 T R T R T R T EIA 232 R T R EIA 232 T R T R EIA 232 T R T R EIA 232 T R T R EIA 232 T R T R EIA 232 T R T R EIA 232 T R T R EIA 232 T R T R EIA 232 T R T R EIA 232 T R T R EIA 232 T R T R EIA 232 T R T R VILINK ModemVILINK Modem VILINK ModemVILINK Modem VILINK ModemVILINK Modem VILINK ModemVILINK Modem VILINK ModemVILINK Modem VILINK ModemVILINK Modem VILINK ModemVILINK Modem VILINK ModemVILINK Modem VILINK ModemVILINK ModemVILINK ModemVILINK Modem VILINK ModemVILINK Modem VILINK ModemVILINK ModemVILINK ModemVILINK ModemVILINK ModemVILINK Modem VILINK Modem VILINK Modem Drop Address: 3 044 4 th/E Drop Address: 5 046 4th /G Drop Address: 6 047 4 th/H Drop Address: 1 048 4th /I Drop Address: 2 049 4 th/J Drop Address: 4 050 4 th/K Drop Address: 7 052 4 th/Mos s Drop Address: 8 053 4 th/Naples Drop Address: 9 054 4 th/Oxford Drop Address: 10 064 3rd/H Drop Address: 11 079 2nd/H Drop Address: 12 082 1st/H Drop Address: 13 084 H/Hilltop Drop Address: 14 093 Eas t H/Hidden Vista 4 WIRE SELF- HEALING FIBER RING 3T R EIA 232 T R T R EIA 232 T R T R T R T EIA 232 R T R EIA 232 T R T R EIA 232 T R T R EIA 232 T R T R VILINK ModemVILINK Modem VILINK ModemVILINK Modem VILINK ModemVILINK Modem VILINK ModemVILINK Modem VILINK ModemVILINK Modem VILINK ModemVILINK Modem VILINK Modem VILINK Modem Drop Address: 6 031 Broadway/Main Drop Address: 7 051 4th/L Drop Address: 2 055 4th/Palomar Drop Address: 3 056 4th/Orange Drop Address: 4 057 4th/Anita Drop Address: 5 058 4th/Main Master 50 EIA 232 Drop Address: 8 279 Montgomery XING MSUMSU Wireless SERIAL ENCOM5100ENCOM5100COM 110: 6 DROPS Modem AT&T DACS 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE Drop Address: 1 060 3rd/E Drop Address: 2 061 3rd/Davidson Drop Address: 3 062 3rd/F Drop Address: 5 078 2nd/F Drop Address: 6 081 1st/E COM 111: 3 DROPS Modem Drop Address: 1 063 3rd/G Drop Address: 5 085 Hilltop/I Drop Address: 6 086 Hilltop/J AT&T DACS 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE COM 112: 5 DROPS Modem 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE Drop Address: 2 065 3rd/I Drop Address: 3 066 3rd/J Drop Address: 4 067 3rd/K Drop Address: 5 080 2nd/L Drop Address: 6 083 1st/L AT&T DACS RADIORADIORADIORADIOWireless SERIAL ENCOM5200ENCOM5200Wireless SERIAL ENCOM5200ENCOM5200EIA 232EIA 232EIA 232 COM 113: 7 DROPS Modem Drop Address: 1 068 3rd/L Drop Address: 2 069 3rd/Moss Drop Address: 4 071 3rd/Oxford Drop Address: 5 088 Hilltop/Naples Drop Address: 6 089 Hilltop/Palomar AT&T DACS EIA 232 Drop Address: 3 070 3rd/Naples Drop Address: 7 260 Hilltop/Oxford EIA 232 COM 114: 7 DROPS Modem Drop Address: 3 074 3rd/Orange Drop Address: 4 075 3rd/Montgomery Drop Address: 8 219 2nd/Quintard AT&T DACS EIA 232 Wireless SERIAL ENCOM5100ENCOM5100Wireless SERIAL ENCOM5100ENCOM5100Drop Address: 1 072 3rd/Palomar Drop Address: 2 073 3rd/Quintard Drop Address: 1 072 3rd/Palomar Drop Address: 2 073 3rd/Quintard 4 WIRE Copper Multi-Drop Line Drop Address: 6 059 4th/Beyer Drop Address: 5 076 3rd/Main COM 115: 5 DROPS Modem 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE Drop Address: 1 087 Hilltop/L Drop Address: 2 092 Cuyamaca/East L Drop Address: 3 095 Eas t L/Nacion/Telegraph Cyn Drop Address: 5 108 Eas t L/Monserate Drop Address: 4 159 Eas t H/Eastlake Dr 4 WIRE Copper Multi-Drop Line COM 116: 9 DROPS Modem Drop Address: 1 154 Albany/Main Drop Address: 6 193 Eas t J/Paseo Del Rey Drop Address: 2 099 Bonita/Willow Drop Address: 3 100 Allen School/Bonita Drop Address: 4 101 Bonita/Otay Lakes Drop Address: 5 102 Allen School/Otay Lakes Drop Address: 12 109 Eas t Orange/ Max Drop Address: 13 110 Main/ Melrose 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE AT&T DACS Drop Address: 9 197 Billy Casper/Bonita Drop Address: 9 197 Billy Casper/Bonita COM 117: 10 DROPS Modem AT&T DACS Drop Address: 7 168 Mace/Main Drop Address: 8 278 Albany/Orange Drop Address: 1 090 Hilltop/Orange Drop Address: 2 091 Hilltop/Main Drop Address: 3 094 Eas t Orange/ Melrose Drop Address: 4 103 2nd/Palomar Drop Address: 5 104 2nd/Orange Drop Address: 6 105 Hilltop/Quintard Drop Address: 9 286 Eas t palomar/Nacion Drop Address: 10 287 Eas t Palomar/Raven 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE Drop Address: 1 106 Bonita/E/Flower Drop Address: 3 107 Bonita/Bonita Glen Drop Address: 4 143 Bonita/Lynwood/Plaza Bonita AT&T DACS Modem 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE Drop Address: 16 266 Eas t H/SR125 SB Drop Address: 17 267 Eas t H/SR125 NB Drop Address: 9 198 Eas t H/Miguel/Proctor Valley 4WIRE Drop Address: 10 227 Mt Miguel/Proctor Valley (N) Drop Address: 11 225 Calle La Marina/Mt Miguel Drop Address: 12 226 Mt Miguel/Paseo Veracruz Drop Address: 14 263 S Miguel Ranch/ SR125 SB Drop Address: 15 264 S Miguel Ranch/ SR125 NB Drop Address: 13 224 Ave Belterra/Mt Miguel Drop Address: 13 224 Ave Belterra/Mt Miguel Drop Address: 18 247 Ave Loretta/San Miguel Ranch Drop Address: 18 247 Ave Loretta/San Miguel Ranch Drop Address: 19 248 Ave Altamira/San Miguel Ranch Drop Address: 19 248 Ave Altamira/San Miguel Ranch Drop Address: 5 241 Proctor Valley/Rocking Horse Drop Address: 5 241 Proctor Valley/Rocking Horse Drop Address: 6 240 Lane/Proctor Valley Drop Address: 6 240 Lane/Proctor Valley Drop Address: 7 239 Hunte/Proctor Valley Drop Address: 7 239 Hunte/Proctor Valley Drop Address: 8 242 Duncan Ranch/Proctor Valley Drop Address: 8 242 Duncan Ranch/Proctor Valley Drop Address: 2 250 Proctor Valley/SM Ranch Shops Drop Address: 2 250 Proctor Valley/SM Ranch Shops COM 122: 23 DROPS Drop Address: 11 235 Birch/La Media Drop Address: 22 238 Eas tlake/Hunte Drop Address: 6 283 Strata/Orion Drop Address: 25 284 Eas tlake/Strata Drop Address: 10 236 Birch/Magdalena Drop Address: 7 262 Birch/SR125 NB Drop Address: 8 261 Birch/SR125 SB Drop Address: 8 261 Birch/SR125 SB Drop Address: 9 251 Birch/Mater Dei Drop Address: 9 251 Birch/Mater Dei Drop Address: 5 282 Artisan/Orion Drop Address: 26 285 Artisan/Millenia Drop Address: 27 288 Millenia/Stylus Drop Address: 21 259 Crossroad/Eastlake Drop Address: 14 243 Magdalena/Santa Luna Drop Address: 4 207 Eas tlake/Kestrel FallsAT&T DACS Modem 4WIRE Drop Address: 12 245 Magdalena/Wolf Canyon Drop Address: 13 244 Magdalena/Peabody 4 WIRE Copper Multi-Drop Line 4 WIRE Copper Multi-Drop Line Drop Address: 1 233 Birch/Eastlake Drop Address: 3 256 Birch/Millenia Drop Address: 2 257 Birch/Orion 4WIRE Drop Address: 16 265 Eas tlake/Stylus Drop Address: 28 222 Hidden/Hunte Drop Address: 28 222 Hidden/Hunte Drop Address: 24 252 Exploration Falls/Hunte Drop Address: 24 252 Exploration Falls/Hunte Drop Address: 23 237 Discovery Falls/Hunte Drop Address: 23 237 Discovery Falls/Hunte Drop Address: 6 142 5th/C Modem AT&T DACS 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE4WIRE Drop Address: 1 125 Hollister/Industrial/Main Drop Address: 1 125 Hollister/Industrial/Main Drop Address: 9 124 Anita/Industrial Drop Address: 9 124 Anita/Industrial Drop Address: 2 126 3rd/Anita Drop Address: 3 127 Eas t Orange/ Loma Drop Address: 3 127 Eas t Orange/ Loma Drop Address: 7 228 Bonita Vista MS/ Otay Lakes Drop Address: 7 228 Bonita Vista MS/ Otay Lakes COM 107: 4 DROPS COM 108: 14 DROPS COM 109: 7 DROPS Drop Address: 9 161 Eas t Palomar/Heritage 4 WIRE Copper Multi-Drop Line Modem Drop Address: 2 097 Elks/Paseo Del Rey/Tele Cyn Drop Address: 5 141 Paseo Ladera/Telegraph Cyn AT&T DACS Drop Address: 1 096 Crest/Oleander/Telegraph Cyn Drop Address: 3 156 Canyon Plaza/Telegraph Cyn Drop Address: 3 156 Canyon Plaza/Telegraph Cyn Drop Address: 4 098 Medical Center/Telegraph Cyn 4WIRE Drop Address: 8 170 Medical Center/Wildauer Drop Address: 10 162 Brandywine/Olympic Drop Address: 7 169 Eas t Naples/Medical Center Drop Address: 23 218 Davies /East Palomar Drop Address: 23 218 Davies /East Palomar Drop Address: 16 144 Paseo Ranchero/Telegraph Cyn Drop Address: 16 144 Paseo Ranchero/Telegraph Cyn Drop Address: 18 171 Heritage/Olympic Drop Address: 18 171 Heritage/Olympic Drop Address: 13 189 High School/Olympic Drop Address: 19 190 Olympic/Santa Venetia Drop Address: 20 172 E Palomar/Heritage Ped Xwalk Drop Address: 20 172 E Palomar/Heritage Ped Xwalk Drop Address: 21 183 Eas t Palomar/Santa Andrea Drop Address: 21 183 Eas t Palomar/Santa Andrea Drop Address: 22 182 Eas t Palomar/Santa Rita Drop Address: 22 182 Eas t Palomar/Santa Rita Drop Address: 17 147 Buena Vis ta/Telegraph Cyn Drop Address: 17 147 Buena Vis ta/Telegraph Cyn Drop Address: 15 153 Eas t J/Paseo Ranchero 4WIRE Drop Address: 14 174 Brandywine/East Palomar COM 123: 7 DROPS Modem AT&T DACS 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE Drop Address: 5 020 Broadway/J Drop Address: 6 021 Broadway/K Drop Address: 2 015 Broadway/F Drop Address: 3 016 Broadway/G Drop Address: 1 018 Broadway/H Drop Address: 4 019 Broadway/I 4WIRE Drop Address: 7 022 Broadway/L COM 116 COM 117 COM 124: 27 DROPS 4 WIRE Copper Multi-Drop Line AT&T DACS Modem Drop Address: 16 179 Eas t Palomar/Santa Rosa Drop Address: 17 253 Greensgate/Greensview Drop Address: 9 152 Eas t Palomar/La Media Drop Address: 7 160 Eas tlake/Greensgate Drop Address: 11 175 La Media/Olympic Drop Address: 12 176 Eas t Palomar/Olympic Drop Address: 12 176 Eas t Palomar/Olympic Drop Address: 14 178 Eas t Palomar/Santa Cora Drop Address: 1 123 Eas tlake Parkway/Otay Lakes 4 WIRE Copper Multi-Drop Line Drop Address: 4 145 Otay Lakes/Village Center Eas t Drop Address: 4 145 Otay Lakes/Village Center Eas t Drop Address: 8 148 Otay Lakes/Rutgers Drop Address: 8 148 Otay Lakes/Rutgers Drop Address: 30 271 Otay Lakes/SR125 NB Drop Address: 30 271 Otay Lakes/SR125 NB Drop Address: 29 270 Otay Lakes/SR125 SB Drop Address: 29 270 Otay Lakes/SR125 SB Drop Address: 27 220 Otay Lakes/Village Ctr West Drop Address: 3 134 Otay Lakes/St Claire 4WIRE Drop Address: 1 111 Eas t H/Paseo Del Rey Drop Address: 2 129 Paseo Del Rey/Plaza Drop Address: 3 130 Eas t H/Tierra Del Rey Drop Address: 4 131 Costco/Tierra Del Rey Drop Address: 5 132 Eas t H/K Mart Drop Address: 6 133 Del Rey/East H Drop Address: 8 140 Eas t H/Terra Nova AT&T DACS Modem 4WIRE 4 WIRE Copper Multi-Drop Line AT&T DACS Modem 4WIRE 4 WIRE Copper Multi-Drop Line Drop Address: 2 138 Oleander/Main Drop Address: 1 137 Brandywine/Main Drop Address: 1 137 Brandywine/Main Drop Address: 7 139 Nirvana/Main Drop Address: 7 139 Nirvana/Main Drop Address: 5 230 Main/ Main Court Drop Address: 5 230 Main/ Main Court Drop Address: 4 167 Main/ Maxwell Drop Address: 4 167 Main/ Maxwell Drop Address: 3 229 Auto Park Place/Main Drop Address: 3 229 Auto Park Place/Main Drop Address: 6 246 Auto Park Ave/Main Drop Address: 6 246 Auto Park Ave/Main 4 WIRE Copper Multi-Drop Line AT&T DACSCOM 128: 20 DROPS Modem Drop Address: 16 196 Evening Star/Hunte Drop Address: 7 200 Exploration Falls/Olympic Drop Address: 4 202 Eas tlake/Corte Vista Drop Address: 1 205 Clubhouse/Greensview Drop Address: 10 234 Hunte/So Greensview Drop Address: 11 268 Olympic/SR125 SB Drop Address: 12 269 Olympic/SR125 NB Drop Address: 2 177 Clubhouse/Eastlake Drop Address: 6 185 Eas tlake/Olympic Drop Address: 3 186 Eas tlake/Trinidad Cove Drop Address: 9 201 Olympic/Town Center Drop Address: 9 201 Olympic/Town Center Drop Address: 5 203 Eas tlake/Caminito Positano Drop Address: 8 204 Olympic/Windingwalk Drop Address: 8 204 Olympic/Windingwalk Drop Address: 13 181 Hunte/Olympic Drop Address: 28 209 Olympic/Wueste Drop Address: 28 209 Olympic/Wueste Drop Address: 26 194 Olympic/Olympic Vista Drop Address: 26 194 Olympic/Olympic Vista Drop Address: 27 215 Olympic/Olympic Training Ctr Drop Address: 27 215 Olympic/Olympic Training Ctr Drop Address: 32 258 Olympic/Viento Estrella Drop Address: 32 258 Olympic/Viento Estrella Drop Address: 31 214 Lake Crest/Wueste Drop Address: 31 214 Lake Crest/Wueste 4WIRE 4WIRE 4 WIRE Copper Multi-Drop Line COM 132 COM 119 COM 129COM 130COM 131 AT&T DACS Modem AT&T DACS Modem 4WIRE Modem AT&T DACS Modem 4WIRE Modem AT&T DACS Modem 4WIRE ModemModem ModemModem ModemModem ModemModem ModemModem ModemModem ModemModem SCATS 113 Eas t H/Paseo Ranchero SCATS 114 Buena Vis ta/East H SCATS 115 Eas t H/Southwestern College SCATS 116 Canyon/Otay Lakes/Ridgeback SCATS 117 Bonita Vista HS/Otay Lakes SCATS 118 Eas t H/Otay Lakes SCATS 150 Bonita Vista HS/Eas t H 4 WIRE AT&T Point -To-Point Line 4 WIRE AT&T Point-To-Point Line 4 WIRE AT&T Point -To-Point Line 4 WIRE AT&T Point-To-Point Line 4 WIRE AT&T Point-To-Point Line 4 WIRE AT&T Point-To-Point Line 4 WIRE AT&T Point-To-Point Line EIA 232 MODEM EIA 232 MODEMMODEM MODEMMODEM EIA 232MODEMMODEM EIA 232MODEMMODEM EIA 232MODEMMODEM 4 WIRE Copper Line MODEMMODEMEIA 232 4 WIRE Copper Line COM 120: 7 DROPS Modem AT&T DACS Drop Address: 6 213 5th/Moss Drop Address: 8 217 5th/Naples Drop Address: 3 121 Hilltop/PedCros swalk Drop Address: 4 112 Avenida Del Rey/Otay Lakes Drop Address: 5 122 Cerro Grande/Otay Lakes Drop Address: 2 120 Corral Canyon/East H/Rutgers Drop Address: 7 216 Eas t Naples/Oleander 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE COM 120: 7 DROPS Modem AT&T DACS Drop Address: 6 213 5th/Moss Drop Address: 8 217 5th/Naples Drop Address: 3 121 Hilltop/PedCros swalk Drop Address: 4 112 Avenida Del Rey/Otay Lakes Drop Address: 5 122 Cerro Grande/Otay Lakes Drop Address: 2 120 Corral Canyon/East H/Rutgers Drop Address: 7 216 Eas t Naples/Oleander 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE Drop Address: 6 166 Eas t Palomar/Paseo Ladera Drop Address: 24 199 Brashear/East Palomar Drop Address: 14 273 Eas t Palomar/Mid -B Ped Xing Drop Address: 14 273 Eas t Palomar/Mid -B Ped Xing EIA 232 MODEMMODEM MODEMMODEM EIA 232 Drop Address: 20 195 Elementray School/Hunte Drop Address: 28 221 Eas tlake/Miller Drop Address: 5 157 Lane/Otay Lakes Drop Address: 25 188 Eas tlake/Fenton Drop Address: 32 223 Fenton/Lane Drop Address: 31 208 Fenton/Otay Lakes Drop Address: 6 158 Hunte/Otay Lakes Drop Address: 21 184 Hunte/Stone Gate Drop Address: 24 187 Otay Lakes/Woods Drop Address: 10 164 Hunte/Greensview/King Creek Drop Address: 2 155 Clubhouse/Hunte Drop Address: 13 191 Lake Crest/Otay Lakes EIA 232 MODEMMODEM EIA 232MODEMMODEM EIA 232 MODEMMODEM EIA 232 MODEMMODEM Drop Address: 4 077 2nd/E Modem AT&T DACS Modem SCATS Drop Address: 1 135 Gotham/Otay Lakes Drop Address: 2 255 Elmhurst/Otay Lakes 4WIRE EIA 232 MODEMMODEM 4 WIRE Copper Point-To-Point Line 272 SIGNALS : 260 RAMS SIGNALS + 12 SCATS SIGNALS (5) Test Controllers (24) City-Owned Fiber Optic Lines (91) Leased Copper Lines (123) City -Owned Copper Lines to Leased Copper Lines (12) SCATS Signals (4) Wireless Signals (11) Offline – No Infrastructure (2) Offline – Leased Telephone Drop RepairOFFLINE SIGNALOFFLINE SIGNAL OFFLINE SIGNALOFFLINE SIGNALRADIORADIO RADIORADIORADIORADIOSMFOC SIGNALSMFOC SIGNAL LEASED LINE SIGNALLEASED LINE SIGNAL CITY COPPER SIGNALCITY COPPER SIGNAL SCATS SIGNALSCATS SIGNAL TEST CONTROLLERTEST CONTROLLER 272 SIGNALS : 260 RAMS SIGNALS + 12 SCATS SIGNALS (5) Test Controllers (24) City-Owned Fiber Optic Lines (91) Leased Copper Lines (123) City -Owned Copper Lines to Leased Copper Lines (12) SCATS Signals (4) Wireless Signals (11) Offline – No Infrastructure (2) Offline – Leased Telephone Drop RepairOFFLINE SIGNAL OFFLINE SIGNALRADIO RADIOSMFOC SIGNAL LEASED LINE SIGNAL CITY COPPER SIGNAL SCATS SIGNAL TEST CONTROLLER 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 428 APPENDIX C FUTURE TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS & TRAFFIC SIGNALS 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 429 PROJECT NAME PROJECT DESCRIPTION SOURCE E STREET WIDENING WIDEN E STREET BETWEEN WOODLAWN AND I‐5 TO ADD A WESTBOUND RIGHT‐TURN LANE AT THE I‐5 NB RAMP, IMPROVE OPERATIONS AT THE I‐5 NB RAMP, AND REDUCE QUEUES IN THE WESTBOUND DIRECTION. URBAN CORE SPECIFIC PLAN H STREET WIDENING WIDEN H STREET BETWEEN THIRD AVENUE AND BROADWAY BY 8 FEET FOR A NEW SEGMENT CONFIGURATION AND BUILDOUT TRAFFIC. URBAN CORE SPECIFIC PLAN BROADWAY WIDENING WIDEN BROADWAY BETWEEN E STREET AND F STREET BY 14 FEET FOR A CONSISTENT ROADWAY SEGMENT CONFIGURATION. URBAN CORE SPECIFIC PLAN WILLOW STREET BRIDGE WIDENING REPLACE AND WIDEN BRIDGE INCLUDING SHOULDERS. SANDAG 2050 RTP, TABLE A.8 ‐ PHASED ARTERIAL PROJECTS ‐ REVENUE CONSTRAINED PLAN NORTH FOURTH AVENUE AND BRISBANE STREET WIDENING ADD ADDITIONAL TRAVEL LANE ON THE EAST SIDE OF FOURTH AVE. SANDAG 2050 RTP, TABLE A.8 ‐ PHASED ARTERIAL PROJECTS ‐ REVENUE CONSTRAINED PLAN Future Road Widening 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 430 INTERCONNECT PROJECT DESCRIPTION SOURCE COPPER INSTALL NEW COPPER BASED WIRE INTERCONNECT TO CLOSE THE COMMUNICATIONS GAP BETWEEN EAST H STREET/ TIERRA DEL REY AND EAST H STREET/ PASEO RANCHERO. ATCS EXPANSION PROJECT FIBER IN COOPERATION WITH MTS, NEW CITY‐OWNED CONDUIT AND SINGLEMODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE WILL BE INSTALLED ALONG PORTIONS OF THE I‐805, EAST PALOMAR STREET, EASTLAKE PARKWAY, BIRCH ROAD, AND THE SR‐125. SOUTH BAY RAPID PROJECT FIBER IN COOPERATION WITH MTS, NEW CONDUIT AND FIBER WILL BE INSTALLED ALONG MAIN STREET FROM INDUSTRIAL BOULEVARD TO SR‐125. A CITY‐ OWNED INNERDUCT AND DEDICATED FIBER WILL BE INCLUDED. MAIN STREET FIBER OPTIC PROJECT FIBER IN COOPERATION WITH A PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT IN THE RANCHO DEL REY AREA, NEW CONDUIT XXX SINGLEMODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE WILL BE INSTALLED ALONG PORTIONS OF NORTH RANCHO DEL REY PARKWAY, SOUTH RANCHO DEL REY PARKWAY, RIDGEBACK ROAD, OTAY LAKES ROAD, EAST H STREET, AND CORRAL CANYON ROAD. CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF WIRELESS INSTALL WIRELESS RADIO COMMUNICATIONS FROM INDUSTRIAL BOULEVARD AND L STREET (EXISTING TELEPHONE DROP SIGNAL) TO INDUSTRIAL BOULEVARD AND NAPLES STREET CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF WIRELESS INSTALL WIRELESS RADIO COMMUNICATIONS FROM FOURTH AVENUE AND L STREET (EXISTING FIBER SIGNAL) TO HILLTOP DRIVE AND L STREET CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF WIRELESS INSTALL WIRELESS RADIO COMMUNICATIONS FROM THIRD AVENUE AND H STREET (EXISTING FIBER SIGNAL) TO THIRD AVENUE AND I STREET CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF Future Traffic Communications Interconnect 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 431 TRAFFIC SIGNAL LOCATION SOURCE MAIN ST/HERITAGE RD VILLAGE 3 SPA HERITAGE RD/SANTA MACHETO VILLAGE 3 SPA HERITAGE RD/SANTA PICACHO VILLAGE 3 SPA HERITAGE RD/SANTA MAYA VILLAGE 3 SPA HERITAGE RD/ENERGY WAY VILLAGE 3 SPA MAIN ST/QUARRY ACCESS RD VILLAGE 3 SPA MAIN ST/PRIVATE RD VILLAGE 3 SPA MAIN ST/SANTA MARISOL VILLAGE 8E SPA OTAY VALLEY RD/SANTA MARISOL VILLAGE 8E SPA DISCOVERY FALLS DR/SANTA DAVIS VILLAGE 10 SPA DISCOVERY FALLS/UNIVERSITY DR VILLAGE 10 SPA DISCOVERY FALLS DR/SANTA JULIARD VILLAGE 10 SPA DISCOVERY FALLS DR/STREET 'B'VILLAGE 10 SPA OTAY VALLEY RD/MAIN ST CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF LA MEDIA RD SB/MAIN ST WB VILLAGE 8W SPA LA MEDIA RD SB/MAIN ST EB VILLAGE 8W SPA LA MEDIA RD NB/MAIN ST EB VILLAGE 8W SPA STREET 'A'/MAIN ST WB VILLAGE 8W SPA OTAY VALLEY RD/STREET 'C'VILLAGE 8W SPA STREET 'A'/MAIN ST EB VILLAGE 8W SPA OTAY VALLEY RD/STREET 'A'VILLAGE 9 SPA, VILLAGE 8W SPA STREET 'A'/STREET 'B'VILLAGE 8W SPA LA MEDIA RD NB/MAIN ST WB VILLAGE 8W SPA MILLENIA AVE/HUNTE PKWY VILLAGE 9 SPA HUNTE PKWY/ORION AVE VILLAGE 9 SPA STREET "C"& STREET "F"/STREET "A"VILLAGE 9 SPA STREET "C"/STREET "B"VILLAGE 9 SPA STREET "E"/STREET "B"CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF STREET "E"/STREET "A" NB VILLAGE 9 SPA STREET "E"/STREET "A" SB VILLAGE 9 SPA CAMPUS BLVD/STREET "B"VILLAGE 9 SPA CAMPUS BLVD/STREET "A" NB VILLAGE 9 SPA CAMPUS BLVD/STREET "A" SB VILLAGE 9 SPA STREET "I"/STREET "A" NB VILLAGE 9 SPA STREET "I"/STREET "A" SB VILLAGE 9 SPA OTAY VALLEY RD/STREET "A"VILLAGE 9 SPA OTAY VALLEY RD/STREET "I"VILLAGE 9 SPA E PALOMAR/MEDICAL CENTER CT CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF E PALOMAR/SANTA OLIVA/SANTA CARINA CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF E PALOMAR/SANTA MARIA/SANTA SIERRA CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF E PALOMAR/SANTA ALICIA CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF E PALOMAR/SANTA FLORA CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF E PALOMAR/SANTA DELPHINA CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF E PALOMAR/VISTA SONRISA CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF Future Traffic Signals 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 432 TRAFFIC SIGNAL LOCATION SOURCE E PALOMAR ST/OLEANDER AV CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF E PALOMAR ST/SHOPPING CTR CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF OLYMPIC PW/FUTURE RD CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF OLYMPIC PW/FUTURE RD CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF OLYMPIC PW/FUTURE RD CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF MAIN ST CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF MAIN ST/MAGDALENA AV CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF MAIN ST/SANTA TIPO CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF SANTA VENETIA ST/SANTA VICTORIA RD CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF TOWN CENTER DR/FUTURE RD CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF TOWN CENTER DR/FUTURE RD CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF SR‐125 NB/FUTURE RD CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF EASTLAKE PW/ENTRANCE CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF MILLENIA AVE/FIRE STATION SIGNAL CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF BOB PLETCHER WY/MILLENIA AVE CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF MILLENIA AVE/FUTURE INTERSECTION CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF K STREET/MILLENIA AVE CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF AVANT ST/MILLENIA AVE CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF K STREET/MONTACE CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF HUNTE PW/MONTACE CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF AVANT ST/BRT CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF J ST/BRT CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF H ST/BRT CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF G ST/C ST CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF AGUA VISTA DR & PROCTOR VALLEY RD CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF PROCTOR VALLEY RD & COASTAL HILLS CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF E PALOMAR ST&VIEW PARK WY CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF E PALOMAR ST&MAGDALENA AV CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF E PALOMAR ST&VISTA SONRISA CROSSWALK CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF LA MEDIA RD&SANTA LUNA ST CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF PASEO MAGDA&PASEO RANCHERO CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF SANTA CHRISTINA AV&SANTA VICTORIA RD CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF STATE ST&RETAIL DR CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF SANTA ALEXIA AV&SANTA VICTORIA RD CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF HERITAGE RD &SANTA VICTORIA RD CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF ORION AV&NORTHERLY DRIVEWAY CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF BRT GUIDEWAY & SOLSTICE AV CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF SANTA CHRISTINA AV&SANTA VICTORIA RD CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF BRT GUIDEWAY & CROSSWALK AT EASTLAKE PW CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF J ST & BAY BLVD BAYFRONT MASTER PLAN L ST & BAY BLVD BAYFRONT MASTER PLAN BAY BLVD & I‐5 SB BAYFRONT MASTER PLAN H ST & STREET "A"BAYFRONT MASTER PLAN J ST & MARINA PKWY BAYFRONT MASTER PLAN J ST & STREET "A"BAYFRONT MASTER PLAN H ST & MARINA PW BAYFRONT MASTER PLAN 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 433 TRAFFIC SIGNAL LOCATION SOURCE DEL MONTE AVE & MAIN ST MAIN STREET STREETSCAPE MASTER PLAN BANNER AVE & MAIN ST MAIN STREET STREETSCAPE MASTER PLAN OTAY VALLEY RD/MAPLE DR & MAIN ST MAIN STREET STREETSCAPE MASTER PLAN JACQUA ST & MAIN ST MAIN STREET STREETSCAPE MASTER PLAN 7TH ST & MAIN ST MAIN STREET STREETSCAPE MASTER PLAN FRESNO AVE & MAIN ST MAIN STREET STREETSCAPE MASTER PLAN 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 434 APPENDIX D FUTURE TRAFFIC SIGNAL COMMUNICATIONS ARCHITECTURE 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 435 Layer 3 Ethernet RouterNODE TSCC -1 T R Optical Ports Layer 3 Ethernet Router SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #4 Optical Ports Optical Ports Layer 3 Ethernet Router Optical Ports R T R T Optical Ports Layer 3 Ethernet Router T R Optical Ports Layer 3 Ethernet RouterNODE TSCC -2 T R T R T R T R CHULA VISTA TSCC & TMC SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #2 SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #6SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #5DMS DMS Controller Transit & Emergency Vehicle Signal Priority Transit & Emergency Vehicle Signal Priority Transit & Emergency Vehicle Signal Priority Solar Panel MVDS RS232 RS485 Click 200 Click 200 Remote Wireless Radio (802.11ac) Master Wireless Radio (802.11ac)MVDSRS232 RS485 Click 200 Click 200 MVDS Cabinet Remote Wireless Radio (802.11ac) IP Camera ATC CMCM CTLR Cabinet IP Camera ATC RR TT TT RR CMCM IP Camera ATC RR TT TT RR CMCM IP Camera ATC RR TT TT RR CMCM R T R T IP Camera ATC RR TT TT RR CMCM T R T R SFP Module Layer 2 Ethernet Switch R T R T 1 Gbps Fiber Port VDSL Copper port 10/100/1000 Mbps Copper Port CMCM Conflict Monitor CAT 5 cable Single Mode Fiber Optic Cable EXISTING COPPER WIRE LINE pair LEGEND OWNED WIRELESS LINK CELLULAR WIRELESS LINK TRAVEL TIME IP Camera ATC CMCM T R T R R T R T IP Camera ATC CMCM T R T R R T R T SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE IP Camera ATC CMCM T R T R T R T R IP Camera ATC CMCM T R T R R T R T IP Camera ATC CMCM T R T R R T R T IP Camera ATC CMCM T R T R R T R T 6 MINUTES TO MAIN ST DMS Controller Transit & Emergency Vehicle Signal Priority Transit & Emergency Vehicle Signal Priority Transit & Emergency Vehicle Signal Priority T R T R 4TH AVE & NAPLES ST IP CameraRRTT TT RR CMCM IP CameraRRTT TT RR CMCM IP CameraRRTT TT RR CMCM IP CameraRRTT TT RR CMCM IP CameraRRTT TT RR CMCM IP CameraRRTT TT RR CMCM IP CameraRRTT TT RR CMCM IP CameraRRTT TT RR CMCM IP CameraRRTT TT RR CMCM IP CameraRRTT TT RR CMCM IP CameraRRTT TT RR CMCM SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #5Master Wireless Radio (802.11ac) Remote Wireless Radio (802.11ac) OWNED WIRELESS LINK GAP IP Camera CMCM BROADWAY & NAPLES ST IP Camera CMCM IP Camera ATC CMCM IP Camera ATC CMCM IP Camera CMCM IP Camera ATC CMCM IP Camera CMCM IP Camera CMCM IP Camera CMCM BROADWAY & D ST Master Wireless Radio (802.11ac) OWNED WIRELESS LINK GAP EXISTING CITY OWNED COPPER WIRE LINEEXISTING CITY OWNED COPPER WIRE LINESINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #4 TRAVEL TIME IP Camera ATC CMCM T R T R R T R T IP Camera ATC CMCM T R T R R T R T SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE IP Camera ATC CMCM T R T R R T R T IP Camera ATC CMCM T R T R R T R T IP Camera ATC CMCM T R T R R T R T IP Camera ATC CMCM T R T R R T R T 6 MINUTES TO MAIN ST DMS Controller Transit & Emergency Vehicle Signal Priority Transit & Emergency Vehicle Signal Priority Transit & Emergency Vehicle Signal Priority TRAVEL TIME IP Camera CMCM T R T R R T R T IP Camera CMCM T R T R R T R T IP Camera CMCM T R T R TIP Camera CMCM T R T R R T R T IP Camera CMCM T R T R R T R T IP Camera CMCM T R T R R T R T 6 MINUTES TO HERITAGE RD DMS Controller Transit & Emergency Vehicle Signal Priority Fire Wall IoT Router Transit & Emergency Vehicle Signal Priority Transit & Emergency Vehicle Signal Priority CMCMCM CMCMCM CMCMCM 5 MINUTES TO 805 DMS Controller CMCMCM CMCMCM CMCMCM Optical Ports Can be 10 Gbps, 40 Gbps, or 100 Gbps via SFP modules VIDsVIDs VIDsVIDs Regional Arterial Management System (RAMS) Server Transparity Fire Wall City Router RAMS Network Agency #01 Fiber R TRT R TRT 10 Gbps or Higher SpeedFiber PortEXISTING CITY OWNED COPPER WIRE LINEEXISTING CITY OWNED COPPER WIRE LINE R T R T ATC ATC ATC ATC ATC ATC ATC ATC ATC ATC ATC ATC ATC ATC ATC ATC ATC ATC ATC ATC ATC ATC ATC ATC ATC ATCATCATC ATC CLOUD 4G Wireless Router CMCMCM 4G Wireless Router CMCMCM 4G Wireless Router CMCMCM VIDEO WALL VIDEO WALL Controller ADAPTIVE CONTROLLER ADAPTIVE CONTROLLER ANIMAL CARE FACILITY ANIMAL CARE FACILITY STAKE HOLDERS’ DEDICATED BUFFER TUBE STAKE HOLDERS’ DEDICATED BUFFER TUBE STAKE HOLDERS’ DEDICATED BUFFER TUBE SEWER PUMP STATION SEWER PUMP STATION SEWER PUMP STATION SEWER PUMP STATION SEWER PUMP STATION SEWER PUMP STATION RECREATION CENTER RECREATION CENTER RECREATION CENTER RECREATION CENTER RECREATION CENTER RECREATION CENTERSTAKE HOLDERS’ DEDICATED BUFFER TUBER TRT VIDEO WALL VIDEO WALL Controller POLICE DEPT. HQ RR TT POLICE STATION POLICE STATION POLICE STATION POLICE STATION POLICE STATION POLICE STATION SOUTH LIBRARY CIVIC CENTER LIBRARY Network Concept version 6 - FIVE NODES.vsdx Last Edit Date: 1/13/2017 NODE 1 NODE 2 NODE 3 TRTR R T R T IP Camera ATC RR TT TT RR CMCM IP Camera ATC RR TT TT RR CMCM IP Camera ATC RR TT TT RR CMCM IP Camera ATC RR TT TT RR CMCM R TRT R T R T R T R T CMCMCM ATC T R T R T R T R SEWER PUMP STATION SEWER PUMP STATION RECREATION CENTER RECREATION CENTER STAKE HOLDERS’ DEDICATED BUFFER TUBE POLICE STATION POLICE STATION POLICE STATION TT RR 4G Wireless Router ATC CMCMCM Internet of Things (IoT) Network Over 4G Cellular System (VPN) Internet of Things (IoT) Network Over 4G Cellular System (VPN) 4G Wireless Router ATC CMCMCM 4G Wireless Router CMCMCM 4G Wireless Router #5 ATCATCATC ATC CMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCM CMCMCM 4G Wireless Router #8 ATCATC ATC CMCMCMCMCMCM CMCMCM 4G Wireless Router #6 ATCATCATC ATC CMCMCMCMCMCM CMCM 4G Wireless Router #7 ATCATCATC ATC CMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCM CMCMCM MVDSRS232 RS485 Click 200 Click 200 Remote Wireless Radio (802.11ac) MVDSRS232 RS485 Click 200 Click 200 MVDS Cabinet IP Camera Remote Wireless Radio (802.11ac) Master Wireless Radio (802.11ac) Master Wireless Radio (802.11ac) Solar Panel EXISTING CITY OWNED COPPER WIRE LINE EXISTING CITY OWNED COPPER WIRE LINE EXISTING CITY OWNED COPPER WIRE LINE EXISTING CITY OWNED COPPER WIRE LINE ATC R T R T R T R T Transit & Emergency Vehicle Signal Priority Transit & Emergency Vehicle Signal Priority ATC CMCMCM ATC CMCMCM ATC CMCMCM 25 MINUTES TO 125 DMS Controller CMCMCM CMCMCM CMCMCM VIDsVIDs EXISTING CITY OWNED COPPER WIRE LINE EXISTING CITY OWNED COPPER WIRE LINE EXISTING CITY OWNED COPPER WIRE LINE ATC ATC ATC RRR TT R TT R T T R TR T R T T R T R T R T R TRAVEL TIME = t2-t1 IP Camera ATC CMCM T R T R R T R T IP Camera ATC CMCM T R T R R T R T SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #1 IP Camera CMCM T R T R R T R T IP Camera CMCM T R T R R T R T IP Camera ATC CMCM T R T R R T R T IP Camera CMCM T R T R R T R T 6 MINUTES TO MAIN ST DMS Controller Transit & Emergency Vehicle Signal Priority Transit & Emergency Vehicle Signal Priority Transit & Emergency Vehicle Signal Priority 4TH AVE & D ST IP Camera ATC CMCM T R T R T R T R ATC ATCATC t1t2 R T R T OLYMPIC TRAINING CENTER OLYMPIC TRAINING CENTER R T R T 4G Wireles Router Fire Wall IP Camera ATC CMCM T R T R R T R T TRTR R T R T CMCMCM ATC R T R TSINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #3 T R T R SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #1SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #1 SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #1SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #1 SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #1SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #1 SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #1SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #1 SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #1SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #1 SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #2SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #2 SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #2SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #2 SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #2 SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #2SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #2 SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #3SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #3 SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #4SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #4 SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #4SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #4 T R T R COMMUNICATIONS SERVER COMMUNICATIONS SERVER SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #2 SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #6SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #6SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #6SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #6R LMR 400 COAX CABLE FIRE TRUCK EXTERNAL ANTENNA FOR WIRELESS RADIO WIRELESS RADIO WITH BUILT -IN ANTENNA Agency #14Fiber Fiber Future Traffic System Communications Network Architecture 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 436 APPENDIX E ORDER OF MAGNITUDE COST ESTIMATES 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 437 1 - Item 1 Fiber Communications System Conversion to Ethernet STC Traffic, Inc. 7/13/2017 Item # Quantity Unit Unit Price Amount 1 25 EA $5,000.00 $125,000.00 $125,000.00 Soft Costs (25%): $31,250.00 $31,250.00 Total: $187,500.00 1 - Item 2 Leased Copper Conversion to City-Owned Broadband Wireless and Connected City-Owned Copper Conversion to Ethernet STC Traffic, Inc 7/13/2017 Item # Quantity Unit Unit Price Amount 1 39 EA $5,000.00 $195,000.00 2 82 EA $7,500.00 $615,000.00 3 82 EA $2,000.00 $164,000.00 4 146 EA $5,000.00 $730,000.00 $1,704,000.00 Soft Costs (25%): $426,000.00 $426,000.00 Total: $2,556,000.00 1 - Item 3 Leased Cellular Traffic Measurement Devices Conversion to City-Owned Broadband Wireless STC Traffic, Inc 7/13/2017 Item # Quantity Unit Unit Price Amount 1 55 EA $5,000.00 $275,000.00 2 13 EA $7,500.00 $97,500.00 $372,500.00 Soft Costs (25%): $93,125.00 $93,125.00 Total: $558,750.00 1 - Item 4 Video Monitoring at Priority Locations STC Traffic, Inc. 7/13/2017 Item # Quantity Unit Unit Price Amount 1 28 EA $8,000.00 $224,000.00 $224,000.00 Soft Costs (25%): $56,000.00 $56,000.00 Total: $336,000.00 Item Description Furnish and Install Layer 2 Ethernet Switch with 2-Dual Fiber Ports Sub Total: Construction Contingency (25%): TRAFFIC SIGNAL COMMUNICATION MASTER PLAN PHASE 1 ORDER OF MAGNITUDE COST ESTIMATE Phase: Scenario: Prepared By: Date: Item Description Furnish and Install Single Radio Furnish and Install Dual Radio Furnish and Install Sectoral Antenna for Dual Radios Phase: Scenario: Prepared By: Date: Furnish and Install Layer 2 Ethernet Switch with 2-Dual Fiber Ports Sub Total: Construction Contingency (25%): Phase: Scenario: Furnish and Install Dual Radio Sub Total: Construction Contingency (25%): Phase: Prepared By: Date: Item Description Furnish and Install Single Radio Scenario: Prepared By: Date: Item Description Furnish and Install CCTV Camera Sub Total: Construction Contingency (25%): 2017-07-07 Cost Est_Summary.xlsx2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 438 1 - Item 5 Dynamic Message Signs STC Traffic, Inc. 7/13/2017 Item # Quantity Unit Unit Price Amount 1 1 EA $150,000.00 $150,000.00 2 2 EA $20,000.00 $40,000.00 $190,000.00 Soft Costs (25%): $47,500.00 $47,500.00 Total: $285,000.00 1 - Item 6 Satellite Maintenance Facility Traffic Management Center STC Traffic, Inc. 7/13/2017 Item # Quantity Unit Unit Price Amount 1 1 EA $2,200.00 $2,200.00 2 4 EA $18,000.00 $72,000.00 $74,200.00 Soft Costs (25%): $18,550.00 $18,550.00 Total: $111,300.00 1 - Item 7 Traffic Signal Controller Ethernet Conversion Upgrade STC Traffic, Inc. 7/13/2017 Item # Quantity Unit Unit Price Amount 1 267 EA $400.00 $106,800.00 $106,800.00 Soft Costs (25%): $26,700.00 $26,700.00 Total: $160,200.00 1 - Item 8 Communications Hub Installation STC Traffic, Inc. 7/13/2017 Item # Quantity Unit Unit Price Amount 1 4 EA $100,000.00 $400,000.00 $400,000.00 Soft Costs (25%): $100,000.00 $100,000.00 Total: $600,000.00 Furnish and Install Layer 3 Communication Hub Sub Total: Construction Contingency (25%): Dynamic Message Sign - Fixed IBase Video Wall Server 46" Television Monitors with Mounts Scenario: Prepared By: Date: Item Description Item Description Furnish and Install 170E Serial to Ethernet Converter Sub Total: Construction Contingency (25%): Phase: Phase: Scenario: Prepared By: Date: Phase: Scenario: Prepared By: Date: Item Description Dynamic Message Sign - Portable Sub Total: Construction Contingency (25%): Phase: Scenario: Prepared By: Construction Contingency (25%): Date: Item Description Sub Total: 2017-07-07 Cost Est_Summary.xlsx2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 439 2 - Item 1 Existing Communications Conduit Upgrade STC Traffic, Inc. 7/13/2017 Item # Quantity Unit Unit Price Amount 1 250 LF $100.00 $25,000.00 2 5 EA $2,500.00 $12,500.00 3 5 EA $1,500.00 $7,500.00 4 170,000 LF $5.00 $850,000.00 5 500 LF $2.50 $1,250.00 6 5 EA $2,000.00 $10,000.00 7 5 EA $2,000.00 $10,000.00 $916,250.00 Soft Costs (25%): $229,062.50 $229,062.50 Total: $1,374,375.00 2 - Item 2 Wireless Radio Communications to Fiber Optic Communications Upgrade STC Traffic, Inc 7/13/2017 Item # Quantity Unit Unit Price Amount 1 45,000 LF $50.00 $2,250,000.00 2 50,000 LF $5.00 $250,000.00 3 3,400 LF $2.00 $6,800.00 4 68 EA $2,500.00 $170,000.00 5 68 LF $2,000.00 $136,000.00 6 68 EA $2,000.00 $136,000.00 7 25 EA $5,000.00 $125,000.00 $3,073,800.00 Soft Costs (25%): $768,450.00 $768,450.00 Total: $4,610,700.00 2 - Item 3 Traffic Signal Equipment Upgrade on Priority Corridors STC Traffic, Inc. 7/13/2017 Item # Quantity Unit Unit Price Amount 1 74 EA $5,000.00 $370,000.00 4 46 EA $8,000.00 $368,000.00 $738,000.00 Soft Costs (25%): $184,500.00 $184,500.00 Total: $1,107,000.00 TRAFFIC SIGNAL COMMUNICATION MASTER PLAN PHASE 2 ORDER OF MAGNITUDE COST ESTIMATE Furnish and Install Breakout SMFO Cable Item Description Furnish and Install 3" PVC Conduit Furnish and Install Fiber Optic Vault Furnish and Install Fiber Optic Pull Box Furnish and Install Trunk SMFO Cable Furnish and Install Breakout SMFO Cable Phase: Scenario: Prepared By: Date: Date: Item Description Furnish and Install 2070 Controller Assembly Furnish and Install CCTV Camera Furnish and Install Fiber Optic Vault Furnish and Install Splice Closure Phase: Scenario: Prepared By: Furnish and Install Fiber Distribution Unit Furnish and Install Layer 2 Ethernet Switch with 2-Dual Fiber Ports Sub Total: Construction Contingency (25%): Furnish and Install Fiber Distribution Unit Furnish and Install Strand Splice Closure Sub Total: Construction Contingency (25%): Item Description Phase: Scenario: Prepared By: Date: Furnish and Install 3" PVC Conduit Furnish and Install Trunk SMFO Cable Sub Total: Construction Contingency (25%): 2017-07-07 Cost Est_Summary.xlsx2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 440 3 - Item 1 Traffic Signal Equipment Upgrade at Remaining Intersections STC Traffic, Inc. 7/13/2017 Item # Quantity Unit Unit Price Amount 1 193 EA $5,000.00 $965,000.00 2 193 EA $8,000.00 $1,544,000.00 $2,509,000.00 Soft Costs (25%): $627,250.00 $627,250.00 Total: $3,763,500.00 3 - Item 2 Video Detection Equipment Upgrade STC Traffic, Inc. 7/13/2017 Item # Quantity Unit Unit Price Amount 1 155 EA $800.00 $124,000.00 $124,000.00 Soft Costs (25%): $31,000.00 $31,000.00 Total: $186,000.00 Item Description Furnish and Install 2070 Controller Assembly Furnish and Install CCTV Camera TRAFFIC SIGNAL COMMUNICATION MASTER PLAN PHASE 3 ORDER OF MAGNITUDE COST ESTIMATE Phase: Scenario: Prepared By: Date: Item Description Furnish and Install Analog to Ethernet Video Encoder Sub Total: Construction Contingency (25%): Sub Total: Construction Contingency (25%): Phase: Scenario: Prepared By: Date: 2017-07-07 Cost Est_Summary.xlsx2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 441 1 Fiber Connection to City Facilities (Police Station, Fire Station) STC Traffic, Inc. 7/13/2017 Item # Quantity Unit Unit Price Amount 1 300 LF $100.00 $30,000.00 2 3 EA $1,500.00 $4,500.00 3 2 EA $5,000.00 $10,000.00 4 700 LF $2.00 $1,400.00 5 2 EA $2,000.00 $4,000.00 6 2 EA $2,000.00 $4,000.00 $53,900.00 Soft Costs (25%): $13,475.00 $13,475.00 Total: $80,850.00 2 Fiber Connections to City Facilities (Fire Station 3, Otay Rec Center, Chula Vista Transit) STC Traffic, Inc. 7/13/2017 Item # Quantity Unit Unit Price Amount 1 2,300 LF $50.00 $115,000.00 2 14 EA $1,500.00 $21,000.00 3 3 EA $5,000.00 $15,000.00 4 3,300 LF $2.00 $6,600.00 5 3 EA $2,000.00 $6,000.00 6 3 EA $2,000.00 $6,000.00 $169,600.00 Soft Costs (25%): $42,400.00 $42,400.00 Total: $254,400.00 3 Fiber Connections to City Facilities (Fire Stations 3,4,6,7,8,9, Veterans Community Park, Montevalle Community Center) STC Traffic, Inc. 7/13/2017 Item # Quantity Unit Unit Price Amount 1 5,400 LF $50.00 $270,000.00 2 40 EA $1,500.00 $60,000.00 3 9 EA $5,000.00 $45,000.00 4 8,300 LF $2.00 $16,600.00 5 9 EA $2,000.00 $18,000.00 6 9 EA $2,000.00 $18,000.00 $427,600.00 Soft Costs (25%): $106,900.00 $106,900.00 Total: $641,400.00 Construction Contingency (25%): Furnish and Install Fiber Optic Pull Box Furnish and Install Layer 2 Ethernet Switch with 2-Dual Fiber Ports Furnish and Install 12 SMFO Cable Furnish and Install Fiber Distribution Unit Furnish and Install 96 Strand Splice Closure Sub Total: Sub Total: Construction Contingency (25%): Phase: Scenario: Prepared By: Item Description Furnish and Install 3" PVC Conduit Furnish and Install Fiber Optic Pull Box Furnish and Install 3" PVC Conduit Furnish and Install Breakout SMFO Cable Furnish and Install Fiber Distribution Unit Furnish and Install Splice Closure Date: Item Description Furnish and Install 3" PVC Conduit Furnish and Install Fiber Optic Pull Box Date: Furnish and Install Splice Closure Sub Total: TRAFFIC SIGNAL COMMUNICATION MASTER PLAN CITY FACILITIES ORDER OF MAGNITUDE COST ESTIMATE Furnish and Install Layer 2 Ethernet Switch with 2-Dual Fiber Ports Phase: Scenario: Prepared By: Date: Furnish and Install Layer 2 Ethernet Switch with 2-Dual Fiber Ports Furnish and Install Breakout SMFO Cable Furnish and Install Fiber Distribution Unit Construction Contingency (25%): Phase: Scenario: Prepared By: Item Description 2017-07-07 Cost Est_Summary.xlsx2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 442 APPENDIX F FUTURE TRAFFIC SIGNAL COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK MAP 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 443 (###) (###) (###) (###) ### ### ### ### ### # # # # # # # # ## # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # ## # # # # # # # # ## # # # ### # # # # # # #### # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # ##### # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # ## # # #### # # # ## # ## # # # # # # # # # ## ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç XY XY XY XY XY XYXY XYXY XY XY XY XY XY XY XY XY XYXY XY XY XY XY XY XYXY XY XY XY XYXYXY XY XYXYXY XY XY XY XY XYXY XYXYXY XY --¡ÇÖ*ÇÖ*ñ kj ñ$+ $+ $+ $+ !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( #* #* #*#*#*#*#*#* #*#* #* #* #*#*#*#*#*#*#* #* #* #* #* #*#* #*#*#* #* #*#* 31 3131 3131 31 3131 31 31 3131 3131 3131 3131 3131 3131 3131 31 3131313131 3131 31 313131 31 3131 31 3131 3131 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 3131 3131 31 31 3131 31 31 31 3131 31 31 31 31 31 3131 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 3131 31 31 31 31 31 3131 31 3131 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 3131 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 3131 31 31 31 31 31 3131 3131 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 3131 31 31 31 31 31 3131 31 31 31 31 31 31 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$508 !"#$508 !"#$508 ·|}þ54·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 E H ST E J ST MAIN ST04TH AVI ST OLYMPIC PYH ST03RD AV J ST E ST L ST F ST BAY BLOTAYLAKESRD HUNTEPYBROADWAYK ST E PALOMAR S THILLTOP DR D ST 01ST AV MOSS ST LAMEDI ARD PALOMAR ST05TH AV NAPLES ST TE L E GRAPH CA NYONRD ANITA ST 02ND AV E L ST E NAPLES S T ORANGE AV G ST C ST HERI T A G E R DLANEAVINDUSTR IAL BL PROCTOR VALLEY RD PA S EOLADERAB O N IT A RDCLUB H O U S E D R E I ST EORANGE A V E OXFORD S T FLOWER S T S RANCHO D E L R E Y PY N R A NCHODELREYPY PASEOD E LREYWU E STERDN 0 2 N D A VN GREEN S V IEW D R E X P L O RATIONFALLSDRCREST DRE F L O W E R S T E PALOMAR D R E H ST 05TH AV K ST02ND AVHERITAGE RDI ST 01ST AVBAY BL G ST ANITA STANITA ST 03RD AVC ST WUESTE RDMAIN KJ HERITAGEMONTACETRIBUTARYMAIN W BS T R E E T " A "SR 125 S A N T A M A R I S O L ARI OTAY VALLEY U N I V E R S I T Y STREET "E"STREET "I"STREET "D"S A N T A D A V I S S AN T A T I PO DI S C O V E R Y F A L L S SA N T A M A C H E T O CAR AW AY STREET "F"CALLE SWANS E A SOLS T ICE STREET "D"SR 125MAINSR 1 2 5 OTAY VALLEY MAIN SAN DIEGO S.D. COUNTY CORONADO NATIONAL CITY SAN DIEGO IMPERIAL BEACH S.D. COUNTY LANDFILL S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY 255 115 117 114 116 118 173 135 150 128 (112)83(112)80 (113)68 (106)28 (114)73 (113)89 (103)41 (117)94 (117)90 (117)91 (109)31 (114)72 (113)71 (109)55 (108)54 (108)53 (105)24 (113)70 (109)58 (109)56 (106)32 (105)26 (105)25 (106)27 (123)22 (103)23 (113)69(108)52 (109)51(105)40 (108)79 (103)17 (108)49 (108)50(105)39 (104)38(123)20 (110)81 (108)84(108)82 (111)63 (111)85 (102)11 (102)12 (110)77(102)13 (110)78 (108)44(104)33 (123)15 (104)37 (108)48 (108)47(104)36 (123)16 (123)21 (111)86 (112)67 (112)66 (112)65 (123)19 (123)18 (108)46(104)35 (108)64 (104)34 (107)45 (107)43 (118)98 (108)93 (116)99 (125)125 (121)143 (117)286 (114)219 (117)278 (113)260 (120)217 (120)213 (106)136 (120)121 (117)104 (125)126 (117)105 (117)103 (116)154 (103)146 (125)127 (116)110 (125)124 (105)192 (107)149 (115)108 (121)107 (125)142 (117)287 (124)221 (116)102 (120)112 (121)263 (121)266 (121)267 (122)244 (124)271(124)270 (128)268 (128)269 (122)237 (122)257(122)256(122)262(122)261 (122)251 (121)248 (121)247 (122)245 (122)243 (122)233 (122)222 (124)253 (124)220 (121)250 (125)228 (103)254 (127)246 (121)224 (121)225 (121)242 (121)241 (121)240 (121)239 (122)236(122)235 (128)234 (127)229 (121)226 (124)223 (118)218 (120)216 (128)214 (127)139 (118)165 (118)170 (118)174 (118)163 (118)162 (118)141 (118)169 (118)172 (118)183(118)182 (124)179 (124)178 (124)152 (118)171 (118)161 (118)153 (118)147 (118)144 (126)132 (126)131 (126)129 (116)100 (116)101 (126)140 (126)133 (127)167 (128)177 (124)164 (124)145 (128)181 (124)148 (127)138 (127)137 (124)158 (124)157(124)123(120)120 (115)159 (118)199 (116)197 (124)195 (128)202 (128)203 (128)201 (118)189 (124)211 (101)206 (118)190 (128)200 (128)185 (128)204 (128)196 (116)193 (128)194 (128)186 (128)205 (124)191 (124)187 (124)208 (124)188 (124)184 EASTLAKE PY EAS T L A K E P Y BIRCH RD PROCTOR VALLEY RD BRANDYWINE AVBONITA R D MT M I G U E L R D FLOWER ST PASEO RANCHEROMEDICAL CENTER DRSAN MIGUEL RANCH R D N 04TH AVTIERRA DEL REYARTISAN ST 03RD AVE 07TH STE NAPLES CT W U E S T E R D MAIN ST HERITAGE RD MAIN ST 113 119 (115)92 (106)29 (109)57(103)30 (114)75 (114)74 (114)76 (114)59 (113)88 (115)87 (110)61 (110)60 (102)14 (115)95 (110)62 (107)42 (118)96 (118)97 (122)265 (122)283 (122)285(122)288 (109)279 (103)281 (103)280 (116)109 (117)168 (121)106 (102)151 (122)284 (122)282 (128)273 (121)264 (122)238 (122)259 (122)252 (128)258 (121)227 (128)215 (127)230 (118)156 (118)166 (124)176 (124)175 (126)130 (120)122 (126)111 (124)155 (124)134 (124)160 (122)207 (128)209 (121)198 City of Chula VistaTraffic Signal Communications Master PlanFuture Traffic Signal Communications Network Map Legend ###System Control Number (###)Communication Number $+Layer 3 Communication Hub 31 Single Wireless Ethernet Radio 31 Dual Wireless Ethernet Radio !(³¸ATC Controller and CCTV Camera Upgrade #*Existing Adaptive Traffic Signal #*Future Adaptive Traffic Signal !(Existing Traffic Signal !(Future Traffic Signal !(Existing Caltrans Traffic Signal !(Future Caltrans Traffic Signal XY Traffic Measurement Device #Ç City-Owned Wireless Tower #Private Wireless Tower Existing Fiber MTS Fiber Caltrans Fiber City of San Diego Fiber Port of San Diego Fiber Future Port of San Diego Fiber Future Fiber New Fiber in Existing COMM Conduit New Fiber in Existing Copper Conduit New Fiber in New Conduit Future Roads ñ City Hall TMC ñ Satellite Maintenance Facility TMC kj Chula Vista Amphitheater --¡Fixed Changeable Message Sign ÇÖ*Portable Changeable Message Sign City of Chula Vista 0 0.5 10.25 Miles Document Path: S:\Projects\Chula Vista\0347_Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan\04 Design\GIS\MXD Files\Chula Vista Comm Phase Implementation Figures.mxd/ 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 444 RESOLUTION NO. __________ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ADOPTING THE CITY’S TRAFFIC SIGNAL COMMUNICATIONS MASTER PLAN WHEREAS, On January 5, 2016, Council approved an agreement between the City of Chula Vista and STC Traffic, Inc. for the development of the City’s first Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan (the Plan); and WHEREAS, the new Plan encompasses four distinct and critical elements: (1) existing systems assessment, (2) needs assessment, (3) future system Architecture and Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) elements, and (4) implementation phasing plan including cost- benefit analysis; and WHEREAS, implementation of the $16M Plan is divided into three phases with a goal of full implementation within 10 years (depending on available funding); and WHEREAS, the new network will provide the capability to provide more efficient and effective traffic signal coordination timing, reduce travel times and greenhouse gases, and upgrade the network for future implementation of adaptive traffic control systems, video monitoring (for traffic) systems, pedestrian and bike counters, and many other ITS, autonomous and connected vehicle, and Smart City technologies. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, that it formally adopts the City of Chula Vista’s Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan. Presented by Approved as to form by William S. Valle Glen R. Googins Director of Engineering & Capital Projects City Attorney 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 445 City of Chula Vista Staff Report File#:17-0319, Item#: 14. CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTING THE 2017 CLIMATE ACTION PLAN RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ADOPTING THE 2017 CLIMATE ACTION PLAN RECOMMENDED ACTION Council adopt the resolution. SUMMARY Since 2000, the City of Chula Vista has been a nationally-recognized leader in implementing a Climate Action Plan (CAP) to address the local threat of climate change by reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and lowering Chula Vista’s vulnerability to expected climate change impacts. By 2020, when the CAP is fully implemented, the new actions, or equivalent actions, are anticipated to reduce approximately 200,000 Metric tons of Carbon Dioxide equivalent (MTCO2e), allowing the City to comply with state greenhouse gas goals and improve the quality of life for our residences. If approved, staff will work to implement the strategies and will return to the City Council with specific policies and ordinances for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Environmental Notice The Project qualifies for a Class 8 Categorical Exemption pursuant to Section 15308 Actions by Regulatory Agencies for Protection of the Environment] of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines. Environmental Determination The Director of Development Services has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the project qualifies for a Class 8 Categorical Exemption pursuant to Section 15308 [Actions by Regulatory Agencies for Protection of the Environment] of the state CEQA Guidelines because the proposal seeks to implement a Climate Action Plan to address the local threat of climate change by reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Thus, no further environmental review is necessary. BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION City staff presented the draft 2017 CAP to the Sustainability Commission (SSC) on August 14, 2017. The SSC recommended that the City Council adopt the updated 2017 Climate Action Plan and directed City staff to begin implementation based on available funding. City staff also presented the draft 2017 CAP Appendix A to the Sustainability Commission (SSC) on City of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 1 of 6 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 446 File#:17-0319, Item#: 14. May 8th, and the draft 2017 CAP to the Chula Vista Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors meeting and the Planning Commission on August 9, 2017 for review and feedback. DISCUSSION For the last 20 years, the City of Chula Vista has been diligent in taking action to address the threat of climate change to the local community. Chula Vista has historically been engaged in multiple climate change forums including the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, ICLEI Cities for Climate Protection Campaign and the Conference of Mayor’s Climate Protection Agreement. The City actions began in 2000 with the adoption of the first Climate Action Plan in San Diego County (originally called the C02 Reduction Plan). Since then the City has subsequently adopted the Climate Mitigation Plan in 2008, the Climate Adaptation Plan in 2011, the City Operations Sustainability Plan in 2014 and the Water Stewardship Plan in 2016. The City continues to be recognized as a leader in Climate Action planning and most recently received the 2014 EPA Climate Leadership Award for Organizational Leadership and the 2016 Institute for Local Governments Platinum Beacon Award for Greenhouse Gas Reductions. In 2017, Chula Vista was highlighted in the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) case study for its work on climate action planning and the implementation of the City Operations Sustainability Plan. The 2017 Climate Action Plan being presented today is the next step in the City’s effort to demonstrate climate leadership, reduce greenhouse gas emissions and help the state reach its ambitious climate goals. In addition to consolidating previous CAP actions, which included 7 climate “mitigation” measures (designed to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions) and 11 climate “adaptation” measures (designed to lower Chula Vista’s vulnerability to expected local climate change impacts), there are 11 new mitigation measures, listed below, included in the 2017 CAP. ·Water Education & Enforcement ·Water Efficiency Upgrades ·Water Reuse Plan & System Installations ·Zero Waste Plan ·Energy Education & Enforcement ·Clean Energy Sources ·Energy Efficiency Upgrades ·Robust Urban Forests ·Complete Streets & Neighborhoods ·Transportation Demand Management ·Alternative Fuel Vehicle Readiness Climate Change Working Group (CCWG): In 2005, the Climate Change Working Group (CCWG) was developed at the direction of the City Council. The City Council directed staff to convene a group of interested stakeholders comprised of residents, businesses, non-profits, academia, utility representatives and community-group representatives to develop recommendations, based on consensus, to reduce the community’s greenhouse gas emissions. The CCWG process ensures involvement of all stakeholders in the development of recommendations for City Council consideration. The CCWG was chaired by a member of the Sustainability Commission which met 10 times over a 9-month period to develop the proposed recommendations. The actions included in the proposed 2017 CAP were selected by a wide range of community stakeholders and reflect an ambitious, but pragmatic, approach to climateCity of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 2 of 6 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 447 File#:17-0319, Item#: 14. wide range of community stakeholders and reflect an ambitious, but pragmatic, approach to climate planning. These 11 new mitigation measures were adopted by the City Council in November of 2014. Due to staffing issues and departmental reorganizations, the development of the CAP was delayed however, staff continued to pursue the implementations actions identified in appendix A of the 2017 CAP. In March 2017, the CCWG was reconvened to review the implementation actions and recommendations that were previously adopted in 2014 and that are now incorporated into the 2017 CAP Appendix A. City efforts to implement the eleven (11) new mitigation measures and the seven (7) previous mitigation measures have continued. Staff has worked to implement early implementation actions such as: ·Adopting a complete streets policy in 2015. ·Creating preferred parking spots at City facilities for alternative fuel vehicles including the installation of electric vehicle charging stations. ·Adopting an update to the Landscape Water Conservation Ordinances. ·Adopting new policies to reduce landscape runoff. ·Converting to over-the-counter and online permits for solar projects. ·Expanding Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) providers. ·Adopting the Water Stewardship Plan in November of 2016. Renewable and Efficient Energy Objective: To help achieve goals of increasing the amount of renewable energy the Chula Vista community uses, City staff continues to build upon work included in past CAPs, such as solar photovoltaic (PV) pre-wiring requirements, and a new initiative that would seek to require solar PV panels on all new homes. Staff continues to work with the existing energy providers on options to increase the amount of renewable energy to the grid. The 2017 Cap has a goal of 50% of electricity from clean sources by 2020 and 70% by 2035. In addition, Community Choice Aggregation (CCA), which is currently being analyzed by other jurisdictions in San Diego County, is another option to increase available renewable energy. Staff will stay involved in the analysis being completed in other jurisdictions. The recent feasibility report released by the City of San Diego contains valuable information and staff will continue to monitor the progress of San Diego’s efforts before bringing forward any recommendations for a Chula Vista Technical/Feasibility study or the possibility of participating in a regional JPA to administer a CCA. The City’s goals for increasing the amount of renewable energy over time currently exceeds the state renewable portfolio standards, but staff will continue to follow legislation, such as SB100, that aims to move utilities in the State closer to the City’s goals and potentially up to 100% clean energy by 2045. By evaluating all of the options listed above, staff will be able to identify the most cost effective path to achieve our clean energy goals. Smart Growth and Transportation: Staff continues efforts to ensure that residents will be able to pick from various transportation modes such as walking, biking, transit or driving. In an effort to ensure easier access to transit options, several sidewalk projects, totaling over 5 miles, were recently constructed in established neighborhoods including near the Broadway transit/commercial corridor. Since 2011, when the Bikeway Master Plan was approved, an additional 33 bicycle facilities have been completed citywide consisting of bike paths, bike lanes and bike routes, totaling 37 miles. These improvements will also City of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 3 of 6 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 448 File#:17-0319, Item#: 14. complement the South Bay Rapid Transit, which when completed will provide a 26-mile long, limited- stop bus service through eastern Chula Vista, from the East Otay Mesa Port of Entry to downtown San Diego. Most recently the city has prepared a Traffic Signal Master Plan that will implement advanced transportation technologies and Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) to reduce traffic congestion and greenhouse gas emissions. The City is currently a 100% planned community and has embraced “smart growth” design principles around transit facilities in the Urban Core Specific Plan (2007), the Eastern Urban Center (2009) and the Palomar Gateway Specific Plan (2014). City of Chula Vista’s Smart Cities Efforts: In essence, a “Smart City” is a “Sustainable City”. The City of Chula Vista is proud to be recognized locally, nationally and internationally for our efforts and vision to become a smart city that uses innovative technologies to improve government efficiency, enhance city operations and advance sustainability efforts. To accomplish this goal, the City is developing a Smart Cities Strategic Action Plan (SCSAP) that will serve as a roadmap and help realize its vision of becoming a smart city. At the center of Chula Vista’s smart cities efforts is the assessment of innovative approaches for energy efficiency and sustainability. In 2016, the City of Chula Vista and the Port of San Diego embarked on a joint project to complete an energy and smart waterfront assessment for the Chula Vista Bayfront. The agencies hired Black and Veatch to conduct the study. The Bayfront development has some of the most aggressive energy efficiency targets for a project of its size and scope. In order to achieve its ambitious sustainability goals, the development will look to incorporate smart city technology and act as a test bed for innovative technology solutions that could be expanded Citywide and in the region. The Office of Sustainability through the Chief Sustainability Officer is responsible for coordinating the development of the Smart Cities Strategic Action Plan throughout the City. The proposed 2017 CAP complements the smart cities efforts and provides an opportunity to leverage both efforts to ensure greater success. The deployment of robust sensor networks, innovative energy efficiency technologies, building and asset management systems, smart irrigation controllers, adaptive lighting, enhanced data reporting tools and other smart cities technologies will help the City reduce energy consumption, increase water conservation effectiveness and reduce GHG emissions across the City. Social Justice: Ensuring that the climate actions benefit all residents, especially those living in disadvantaged neighborhoods, staff has utilized the “Green Homes for All” program, in partnership with the City’s Housing Division, to develop eight (8) of the eleven (11) new GHG reduction measures. The City working with local non-profits provided no-cost Home Energy & Water Evaluations that assisted disadvantaged residents by reducing utility bills and improving the health of homes. In 2016, more than 2,080 households enrolled in the Energy Savings Assistance Program resulting in those homes being weatherized, cutting costs on heating and air conditioning for our most vulnerable families. In addition, the removal of the South Bay Power Plant, the adoption of regulations on the proper placement of peaker and base load facilities and the allocation of Measure P infrastructure projects in our disadvantaged communities continues to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by providing facilities that support multi-modal forms of transportation and enhanced public amenities like parks and recreational facilities. The attached 2017 CAP includes information about past climate actions taken, the regulatoryCity of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 4 of 6 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 449 File#:17-0319, Item#: 14. The attached 2017 CAP includes information about past climate actions taken, the regulatory framework of state and federal polices and the institutionalized work the City is doing to create clean water, clean air and clean land. More detailed implementation actions for each measure, including information about performance metrics, estimated GHG reductions, timelines, funding and responsible City Departments are included in Appendix A. The new mitigation measures are anticipated to reduce MTCO2e GHG emissions (approximately 0.7 MT of per capita reductions and 19% below the business-as-usual, or BAU, emissions), by approximately 200,000 MTCO2e in 2020. In addition, these climate action measures create numerous community benefits such as utility cost savings, better air quality, reduced traffic congestion, local economic development and improved quality of life for Chula Vista residents. The proposed CAP is consistent with previous climate actions taken by the City of Chula Vista in that it is a living planning document that is able to be easily updated and is built on a foundation of promoting consensus and outreach. The CAP is focused on providing a path for City leaders, residents and businesses to reduce emissions and is not a document to aid in development streamlining. The City of Chula Vista is a fully planned community and each planning document considered by the City has evaluated GHG impacts and provided appropriate mitigation measures to address these impacts in accordance with the requirements of CEQA. DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT Staff has reviewed the decision contemplated by this action and has determined that it is not site specific and consequently, the 500-foot rule found in California Code of Regulations section 18704.2 (a)(1), is not applicable to this decision. Staff is not independently aware, and has not been informed by any City Council member, of any other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter. LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS The City’s Strategic Plan has five major goals: Operational Excellence, Economic Vitality, Healthy Community, Strong and Secure Neighborhoods and a Connected Community. The Climate Action Plan update process is identified under the Strategic Plan’s Healthy Community goal as a near-term priority. CURRENT YEAR FISCAL IMPACT The Climate Action Plan is being implemented using existing departmental budgets and external funding sources (such as, City’s Local Government Partnership with San Diego Gas & Electric and the California Public Utilities Commission and AB939 waste management fees), resulting in no new fiscal impact in the current year. ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT There is no new, ongoing fiscal impact due to implementation of the Climate Action Plan since it is being implemented using existing budgets and external funding sources. Any recommended updates to the Climate Action Plan will be presented to City Council for consideration in the future along with any associated fiscal impact. ATTACHMENTS 1) 2017 Climate Action Plan 2) 2017 Climate Action Plan: Appendix A 3) 2017 Climate Action Plan: Appendix B City of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 5 of 6 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 450 File#:17-0319, Item#: 14. 4) Comment letter from Climate Action Campaign 5) Comment letter from San Diego Gas & Electric Staff Contact: Cory Downs, Conservation Specialist II City of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 6 of 6 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 451 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ADOPTING THE 2017 CLIMATE ACTION PLAN WHEREAS, Chula Vista has been a nationally-recognized leader in implementing a Climate Action Plan to address the threat of climate change to the local community; and WHEREAS, greenhouse gas emissions from municipal operation have been reduced 29 percent from their baseline, however, due mainly to population growth total community emissions have increased by 10 percent, while community per capital emissions have decreased by 4.2 percent; and WHEREAS, the Climate Change Working Group, which included residents, business, non-profit, education, and utility representative, met 10 times over a 9 month period to develop recommendations by consensus and once more in 2017 to approve staff implementation actions; and WHEREAS, In 2014 the City Council adopted Resolution #2014-006 for incorporating 11 greenhouse gas reduction strategies recommended by the Climate Change Working Group into the 2017 Climate Action Plan; and WHEREAS, the greenhouse gas reductions strategies include topics such as water conservation and reuse, renewable and efficient energy, zero waste, and smart growth and transportation; and WHEREAS, Staff will work with community partners to implement the actions identified in the 2017 Climate Action Plan Appendix A; and WHEREAS, fully implementing the actions identified in the 2017 Climate Action Plan, or equivalent actions, can reduce 2020 greenhouse gas emissions by 208,220 metric tons and help the City meet State of California greenhouse gas reduction goals; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, that it adopts the 2017 Climate Action Plan, and directs staff to begin implementation and return to Council with regular greenhouse gas inventories and progress reports. Presented by Approved as to form by 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 452 Eric Crockett Glen R. Googins Director, Economic Development City Attorney 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 453 CHULA VISTA ClimateActionPlan www.chulavistaca.gov/clean 2017 DRAFT2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 454 Contents Executive Summary Part 1: Introduction Part 2: Previous Actions - Where We Came From… Part 3: Where We Want to Go WATER CONSERVATION WASTE REDUCTION RENEWABLE & EFFICIENT ENERGY SMART GROWTH & TRANSPORTATION Part 4: Tracking, Monitoring and Updates APPENDIX A – Implementation Actions APPENDIX B – Past Action Update APPENDIX C – User Guide to Action ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 3 4 6 16 19192021 22 2 DRAFT2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 455 The City of Chula Vista is the second-largest municipality in San Diego County and located at the center of one of the richest cultural, economic and environmentally diverse zones in the United States. This natural environment helped City leaders recognize the value of preserving the environment for future generations and taking early action. Starting in 2000 with the adoption of the Carbon Dioxide Reduction Plan (CO₂ Reduction Plan or “Climate Action Plan”) which was the first Climate Action Plan (CAP) adopted in San Diego County and continuing over the next 17 years, new plans have been created to further incorporate measures to mitigate (2008) and adapt (2011) to the climate change impacts within our community. These plans made possible a number of community shared benefits such as utility savings, better air quality, reduced traffic congestion, increased public health, local economic development – improved quality of life – clean water, clean air, and clean land. These actions were recognized by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in 2014 when they awarded the City the Organizational Leadership Award for Climate Leadership. But as a growing city, reducing total emissions has been a challenge. Since the first greenhouse gas (GHG) inventory in 1990 the population has increased 84 percent but GHG emissions have only increased 42 percent, which has caused the per capita emissions to decrease 23 percent to 6.1 metric tons (MT) of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO₂e) per person. The state has set a draft goal of 2 MT CO₂e per person by 2050 so the City will have to keep advancing to meet these ambitious goals. The actions and goals described in the 2017 Climate Action Plan will continue the City's commitment with the overarching goals of: • Energy and Water Efficient Buildings • Smart Growth and Clean Transit • Zero Waste • Increase Local Energy and Water Resources • Lead by Example • Community Resilience The City also strived to incorporate public involvement and input through the Climate Change Working Group and other partners to learn from and build support with residents, businesses and all community members. As with past CAPs this document is a living document and may change over time to take advantage of new opportunities to create a cleaner community. City staff will work to implement, track and monitor the actions to report back to stakeholders and City leaders. City leadership will also continue to engage the broader global community to take similar GHG reduction actions and will highlight the positive economic impact those green actions can have. Executive Summary City staff will work to implement, track and monitor the actions to report back to stakeholders and City leaders. Mary Casillas Salas Mayor City of Chula Vista, CA "This plan is the next step in our City's long history of working to address climate change and allows us to showcase that a clean environment and economic development can progress together." 3 DRAFT2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 456 1Part 4 | CHULA VISTA CLIMATE ACTION PLAN DRAFT2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 457 The City of Chula Vista is located at the center of one of the richest cultural, economic and environmentally diverse zones in the United States. Chula Vista is the second-largest municipality in San Diego County with a population of over 268,000 and features more than 52 square miles of coastal landscape, canyons, rolling hills, mountains, quality parks and has preserved over 11,000 acres of open space. City leaders long ago recognized the value of preserving the environment for future generations. In the early 1990s, the City of Chula Vista took a big step on its long path of addressing climate change when it was asked to participate with a select group of cities throughout the world in a model program aimed at developing municipal action plans for the reduction of greenhouse gases. The program was sponsored by ICLEI – Local Governments for Sustainability and the United Nations Environment Programme and provided important encouragement and resources to take early action. Since then, City Council has adopted three plans in its long-standing effort to reduce the impacts of climate change. To help guide implementation of the Climate Action Plan, the City regularly conducts greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions inventories every two years, if data is available, and has provided public forums for developing mitigation and adaptation measures. During 2014, a Climate Change Working Group (CCWG) led by City staff and comprised of residents, businesses and community organization representatives, reconvened to update the Climate Action Plan measures. The CCWG partnership has provided a unique, open and transparent process establishing new actions to take the City closer to achieving statewide goals of reducing GHG emissions to 15 percent below 20051 emission levels by 2020 and 55 percent by 2030. The CCWG was also convened in 2007 and 2011 to develop earlier recommendations to reduce the community’s GHG emissions or adapt to expected changes of climate change. This document serves as a snapshot in time, describing the continued action, measurement development, implementation and progress toward reducing GHG emissions. It is also designed to assist residents, business and other community members in making GHG reducing actions both through new policies and educating about existing options. Introduction 1 The City measures GHG emission in CO₂e, or car- bon dioxide equivalent, which is a standard unit for measuring carbon footprints. It shows the impact of each different greenhouse gas (such as CH₄, N₂0, etc.) in terms of the amount of CO₂ that would create the same amount of warming. A common measurement of GHG emissions is denoted as metric tons (MT), as noted in the illustration. 5 Source: www.carbonvisuals.comDRAFT 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 458 2Part 6 | CHULA VISTA CLIMATE ACTION PLAN DRAFT2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 459 Over the past twenty years, the scientific community has gained more confidence about what was previously called “global warming”, and later renamed climate change, due to the wide range of impacts that were being observed. As more research was completed, more confidence was created and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), one of the largest groups of scientists gathered to study the issue, stated in their Fifth Assessment Report2 that “each of the last three decades has been successively warmer than any preceding decade since 1850” and that “it is extremely likely that human influence has been the dominant cause of the observed warming since the mid-20th century.” The human influences referenced are mainly from burning fossil fuels and other processes that add greenhouse gas emissions to the atmosphere, over-saturating the natural balance. This document combines over 20 years of work on climate action planning in the City of Chula Vista, incorporating the CO₂ Reduction Plan (2000), mitigation and adaptation plans (2008/2011) and the more recent Climate Action Plan measures that were adopted by City Council in 2014. Previous Actions WHERE WE CAME FROM... Regulations & Guidance Regulations that have been devel- oped over the years provide guid- ance, direction and goals for achiev- ing GHG emissions reduction work. A comprehensive listing of state climate legislation can be found at http://climatechange.ca.gov/state/ legislation.html. STATE LEGISLATION GOAL CHULA VISTA IMPACT AB32 (2006)Requires California to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels by 2020. Recent guidance in the draft AB32 2017 Scoping Plan has identified a local government per capita GHG emission goal of 6 MT CO₂e by 20303 and 2 MT CO₂e by 2050 • Adopted first Climate Action Plan in San Diego County in 2000 • Reduced GHG emissions to 6.1 MT CO₂e per person which is slightly above the draft AB32 scoping plan goals SB97 – CEQA (2007) Requires public agencies to evaluate the environmental impacts of discretionary development plans and projects in their jurisdictions All new discretionary development projects are evaluated per SB97 AB 811 (2008)Allows local governments to establish special districts that can be used to finance energy efficiency, solar or other renewable energy improvements Established PACE programs that allowed contractor to finance more than $45 million worth of energy efficiency, renewable energy and water efficiency upgrades to Chula Vista properties since 2014 SB 375 (2008)Requires metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs) to develop a regional “Sustainable Communities Strategy” (SCS) that will move the region towards its GHG target San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG), of which Chula Vista is a member, was the first agency in California to adopt an SCS in October 2011 and also adopted the more comprehensive San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan in October 2015 Low Carbon Fuel Standards (2009) Calls for a reduction of at least 10% in the carbon intensity of California’s transportation fuels by 2020 Chula Vista’s fleet is currently composed of 36% alternative fuels and/or electric vehicles and has a policy of replacing all new vehicles with alternative fuel vehicles where possible; all contracted fleet for solid waste collection is CNG (compressed natural gas) SB 350 (2015)Establishes new clean energy, clean air (50% renewable energy and doubling energy efficiency savings by 2030) and greenhouse gas reduction goals for 2030 and beyond San Diego Gas and Electric (SDG&E) had a renewable energy rate of 43% at the end of 2016 and have contracts in place to extend that to 49% by 2021 7 2 https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/ 3 The reduction goal may be lower once adjusted for relevant local emission categories.DRAFT2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 460 Cities are important partners in climate protection because they exercise key powers over urban infrastructure. Those powers include neighborhood design, transportation infrastructure (such as roads, streets, pedestrian areas, bicycle lanes and public transportation), waste management, parks, local buildings and facilities. All of these directly relate to the contribution of greenhouse gas emissions and correlated energy use. The 20 action measures listed were key components of Chula Vista’s original CO₂ Reduction Plan. 4 #STRATEGY FOCUS #STRATEGY FOCUS 1 Municipal Clean Fuel Vehicles 11 Pedestrian/Bicycle Site Orientation 2 Private Clean Fuel Vehicles 12 Bicycle/Transit/Employment Integration 3 Municipal Clean Fuel Demonstrations 13 Bicycled Lands/Paths/Routes 4 Telecommuting/Tele-centers 14 Energy efficient Landscaping 5 Municipal Buildings/Employee Trips 15 Solar Pool Heating 6 Pedestrian/Transit Connections 16 Traffic Signals 7 Housing Density Near Transit 17 Student Transit Subsidy 8 Transit Oriented Site Design 18 Greenstar Program 9 Increased Land-Use Mix 19 Municipal Purchasing Standards 10 Reduced Commercial Parking 20 Employment Density Near Transit Original CO₂ Reduction Plan (2000) 8 No-Cost Home Energy & Water Check-up Composting Class: Living Coast Discovery Center 4 To review the full plan please visit: www.chulavistaca.gov/home/ showdocument?id=5445 DRAFT2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 461 City staff members were able to implement many of the plan's actions, including: Traffic Signal LED Retrofit – Replaced 150 incandescent traffic signals to LED modules that reduced energy usage by 90 percent and saved maintenance cost because of the longer bulb life. Increased Density – Transit-oriented development (TOD) was identified in the 2005 General Plan update and has been incorporated in developments and plans such as the Urban Core Specific Plan. Alternative Fuel Vehicles – Converted transit buses to alternative fuel (CNG). “...Each of the last three decades has been successively warmer than any preceding decade since 1850. It is extremely likely that human influence has been the dominant cause of the observed warming since the mid-20th century.” – Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) TRAFFIC SIGNALS Retrofitted all incandescent traffic signals to LED modules that saved energy and reduced maintenance cost. 9 Native Plant: Common Golden Stars (Bloomeria crocea); Rice Canyon, Chula VistaDRAFT 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 462 In May 2007, staff reported to City Council that Chula Vista’s per capita greenhouse gas emissions decreased by 17 percent; however, mainly due to a 61 percent growth in population, citywide emissions had increased by 35 percent from 1990 to 2005. As a result, the City Council directed staff to convene the CCWG to develop recommendations to mitigate, or reduce, the community’s greenhouse gas emissions, or “carbon footprint” to minimize the severity of predicted impacts of climate change – and to assist in meeting the City’s greenhouse gas emissions reduction targets. The CCWG selected seven measures that were adopted by City Council on April 1, 2008. 2008 MITIGATION MEASURES POLICY/ PROGRAM PROGRAM STRATEGY ACTION 1 100% Clean Vehicle Replacement Policy for City Fleet Replace retired vehicles through the purchase or lease of alternative fuel and hybrid vehicles where available 36% of city vehicles are alternative fuel vehicles with a goal to increase to 40% by 2020 2 100% Clean Vehicle Replacement Policy for City-Contracted Fleet Services Work with current and future vendors to include a “Clean Vehicle” replacement policy into the bid and contracting process Chula Vista transit and waste hauling have been converted to 100% alternative fuel vehicles 3 Business Energy Assessments Through an ordinance addition, encourage businesses to participate in a no-cost assessment as part of the business licensing process To date more than 5,700 no-cost business evaluations have been conducted with more than 50% implementing an energy saving action 4 Green Building Standard Through a building code revision, require new and renovated buildings to increase their energy efficiency and meet statewide green building standards Required new building to be 15% more energy efficient that 2011 code and required pre-plumbing for water re-use 5 Solar & Energy Efficiency Conversion Provide a cost-effective, streamlined mechanism for property owners to implement solar and energy efficiency upgrades and create a municipal code requiring pre-wiring for solar electric systems Passed “solar ready” ordinance in 2009 and created PACE financing programs in 2014 6 Smart Growth Around Trolley Stations Implement the ‘smart growth’ design principles outlined in municipal planning documents The Palomar Gateway specific plan emphasizes multi-modal, mixed-use development patterns and was approved by City Council in 2013 7 Outdoor Water Conservation Provide a cost-effective, streamlined mechanism for installing water saving plants at private/public sites and create new municipal landscape regulations The Landscape Water Conservation Ordinance was updated in 2011 and 2015 and PACE financing can also be used for water conservation upgrades BUILDING CODES Homes required to be PV ready before state mandate SAVING WATER Updated landscape ordinance FINANCING Launched PACE Program that has financed over $45 million in energy and water conservation projects 10 Climate Mitigation Plan (2008) To review the full Climate Mitigation Plan visit: http://www.chulavistaca.gov/home/showdocument?id=5433DRAFT 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 463 Climate Adaptation Plan (2011) Climate adaptation means taking actions today to prepare for expected current and future impacts of climate change. The City of Chula Vista has long understood the risk of climate change to its community and has established itself as a leader among municipalities in planning to reduce, or mitigate, citywide greenhouse gas emissions. However, despite efforts both locally and globally to mitigate emissions, some level of climate change will still occur, and will have noticeable impacts on the San Diego region. In order to manage these climate change impacts, and to reduce future risks and costs, the City’s CCWG recommended 11 strategies listed here to “adapt” the community to these impacts within energy and water supply, public health, wildfires, ecosystem management, coastal infrastructure and the local economy sectors. Also referred to as “resiliency planning” some adaptation actions address long standing natural vulnerabilities (such as wildfires or lack of local water) that are now being magnified by climate change. Addressing these concerns, for example by increasing local water supply through water re-use, is able to reduce the costs and impacts of these already existing concerns. #STRATEGY FOCUS 1 Cool Paving 2 Shade Trees 3 Cool Roofs 4 Local Water Supply & Reuse 5 Storm Water Pollution Prevention & Reuse 6 Education & Wildfires 7 Extreme Heat Plans 8 Open Space Management 9 Wetlands Preservation 10 Seal Level Rise & Land Development Codes 11 Green EconomySEA LEVEL RISE Increased grading ordinance and subdivision manual to account for sea level CLIMATE RESILIENCE Required new homes to be pre-plumbed for laundry-to- landscape water re-use GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE Created new shade tree and cool roof policy Also referred to as “resiliency planning” some adaptation actions address long standing natural vulnerabilities (such as wildfires or lack of local water) that are now being magnified by climate change. 11 Le May Pond, Otay Valley Regional Park, Chula Vista To review the full Climate Adaptation Plan visit: http://www.chulavistaca.gov/home/showdocument?id=5443 DRAFT2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 464 Municipal Action (2014) Emissions from municipal operations represent a small percentage of the larger community emissions. But aggressively reducing municipal emissions has showcased how the City is leading by example. This leadership included broad support from the City Council, as well as City staff, and resulted in 2014 City operations achieving a 29 percent reduction in GHG emissions from the 2005 baseline. To maintain that momentum, City leaders initiated the formation of a staff stakeholder group called the Green Team, that created the “City Operations Sustainability Plan”⁵ in 2014. This plan was promoted by the U.S. Department of Energy as an implementation guide for other jurisdictions to follow. CITY OPERATIONS SUSTAINABILITY PLAN SECTOR GOAL (BY 2020) Energy Use Reduce municipal energy use by 20% through energy efficiency and renewable energy initiatives Water Use Reduce overall municipal potable water use by 10% through water conservation, efficiency and reuse Green Purchasing At least 80% of all office and custodial supplies annually are categorized as “green” Recycling & Waste Management At least 75% of waste from municipal operations is recycled annually Pollution Prevention Prevent all non-storm water discharges from municipal facilities to storm drains Transportation Transition 40% of fleet to hybrid or other alternative fuel technology Green Buildings and Infrastructure All new buildings over 10,000 square feet will be designed and constructed to meet enhanced green building standards, while at least two existing buildings will be operated and maintained to meet enhanced green building standards Timeline 1993 Citywide Recycling 1997 City Council member attended Kyoto Protocol adoption Local Government Champion 2012 South Bay Energy Action Collaborative Formed (SoBEAC) Chula Vista Bayfront Master Plan was unanimously approved by the California Coastal Commission 2013 Platinum Beacon Spotlight Award for Best Practices 2nd place in the “Cool California Challenge” from California Air Resources Board 2014 City operations achieved a 29% reduction in GHG emissions from the 2005 baseline. 12 5 www.chulavistaca.gov/home/showdocument?id=9725 2000 Adopted First CO₂ Reduction Plan Adopted Mitigation Plan Adopted Adaptation Plan 2008 2011 DRAFT2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 465 EV CHARGING Installed 28 EV charging stations at 5 municipal facilities and working with SDG&E to add more than 100 new chargers GLOBAL EFFORTS Mayor attended the COP 21 Paris Climate Conference and joined the Compact of Mayors in 2015 MUNICIPAL ENERGY All 7,800 street lights converted to LED and installed 1.7 MW of solar PV to reduce municipal GHG by 29% since 2005 SAVING WATER Updated landscape ordinance, removed excess turf at facilities and adopted Water Steward ship Plan in 2016 20152014 Developed Food Waste Collection Program pilot project EPA Climate Leadership Award – Organizational Leadership Award Creation of City Operations Sustainability Plan SDG&E Local Government Champion Platinum Beacon Spotlight Award for Agency Energy Reductions Recertified as a Tree City USA (23rd time in the last 30 years) Adopted Complete Streets Policy Mayor attends COP21 / Paris Climate Conference 2016 Created Water Stewardship Plan Platinum Beacon Spotlight Award for Agency GHG Reductions DRAFT2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 466 GHG Emissions The City of Chula Vista is the second largest city in San Diego County and still has approximately 18,000 new homes and over 15 million square feet of commercial build- ing space to be built. Because Ch- ula Vista is a growing city, the total GHG emissions have also grown. However, since the City took ear- ly actions starting in the 1990s to reduce GHG emissions, recent per capita emissions (shown in table on the following page) indicate a 4 percent reduction from 6.1 MT CO2e in 2005 to 5.9 MT CO2e in 2012. The pie charts also provide informa- tion on the various emissions sourc- es for each inventory year, including 1990 which is no longer the City's baseline due to data availability but provides historical context. If the City had not taken early actions, the community would currently be emitting up to 30 percent more or 443,000 MT CO2e more emissions. 5 1990 transportation emissions were updated to better reflect newer transportation methodology by calibrating the old emissions based on the difference between 2005 old and new methodologies; water emissions were updated based on population. 1990 is provided for historical perspective but is not compli- ant with current inventory methodologies. Chula Vista GHG Emissions by Source 1990 2005(baseline) 2012 14 DRAFT2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 467 1990⁵2005 2012 2030 2050 Population 135,136 217,543 249,382 313,475 345,586 Total Emissions 1,034,272 1,333,130 1,464,735 N/A N/A Draft State per Capita Goals N/A N/A N/A 6.0 2.0 Per Capita Emissions 7.7 6.1 5.9 N/A N/A Chula Vista GHG Emissions If the City had not taken early actions, the community would currently be emitting up to 30 percent more or 443,000 MT CO₂e more emissions. Alternative Fuel Vehicle Contracted by the City 15 DRAFT2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 468 3Part 16 | CHULA VISTA CLIMATE ACTION PLAN DRAFT2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 469 Ahead of the Curve Since Chula Vista began working on cli- mate change planning 20 years ago, protocols have been updated and stan- dardized for consistency in reporting statewide. Because of these updates, the oldest inventory year, 1990, is no lon- ger compliant with the newer inventory protocols. The baseline was updated to 2005, which has all the necessary data, and aligns the City’s GHG reduction goals with the State’s goals to reduce communi- ty-wide GHG emissions to 15 percent be - low 2005 levels by 2020, and 55 percent below 2005 by 2030. New guidance, including the 2017 draft AB 32 Scoping Plan Update, lists a local government per capita, or person, re - duction goal of 6 MT CO2e by 2030 and 2MT CO2e by 2050. This is just another way to show compliance with state goals. This new goal setting approach better aligns with Chula Vista’s growing popu- lation, which has led to increased total GHG emissions. Shifting from total emis- sions to per capita emissions accounting provides a more accurate picture of the reductions being achieved. Using the per capita goals, Chula Vista appears to almost be in compliance with the 2030 goal. However, the longer-term 2050 goal is ambitious and will require the City to continue taking appropriate and aggres- sive actions. Where We Want to Go Chula Vista GHG Emission Forecast Chula Vista Per Capita Emission Forecast 2017 & BEYOND DRAFT2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 470 Environmental justice demands that public policy be based on mutual respect and justice for all peoples, free from any form of discrimination or bias. The City of Chula Vista works diligently to ensure that all people within the community have a voice in their government. The development of this Climate Action Plan was built via community participation and review through the CCWG. The implementation of the actions and measures within this Plan will move forward within that same context. The CCWG is one example of that commitment but additional examples include the removal of the South Bay Power Plant, incorporated environmental justice language in the most recent 2005 General Plan Update, a prioritization of Measure P funds in disadvantaged communities and providing internet hot spots available to be checked out from libraries for no cost. Environmental Justice The CCWG evaluated new opportunities to help reach the Chula Vista Climate Action Plan’s greenhouse gas reduction goals. The CCWG identified 11 action areas that could result in an additional 208,220 MT CO₂e in reductions – approximately 0.7 MT of per capita reductions and a nearly 19 percent reduction from Business As Usual (BAU) emissions – by 2020, improving local air quality, generating utility savings, reducing traffic congestion and promoting a healthier community. These recommendations were adopted by City Council in late 2014 and form the foundation of the actions below. When combined with State and Federal reduction efforts an additional reduction of 194,950 MT CO₂e is anticipated in Chula Vista (or approximately 0.4 MT of per capita reductions). For more detailed information about the specific actions including timelines, funding and responsible City departments, please see Appendix A “Implementation Actions.” New Emission Reduction Actions Economic Development & Jobs Actions that will help stimulate local economic activity Air Quality Actions that help improve local air quality Water Quality Actions that help improve local water quality Education Actions that will provide education and assistance to community members Community Health Actions that will improve general community health Equity Actions that assist traditionally disadvantaged communities in the City The icons below represent additional benefits that these new actions will provide including:DRAFT2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 471 1 Water Education & Enforcement A) Expand education and enforcement targeting landscape water waste 2 Water Efficiency Upgrades A) Update the City’s Landscape Water Conservation Ordinance to promote more water‐wise landscaping designs B) Require water‐savings retrofits in existing buildings at a specific point in time (not point of sale) 3 Water Reuse Plan & System Installations A) Develop a Water Reuse Master Plan to maximize the use of storm water, graywater and onsite water reclamation B) Facilitate simple graywater systems for laundry‐to‐landscape applications C) Streamline complex graywater systems’ permit review WATER CONSERVATION & REUSE Support source reduction & product stewardship Increase collection of recyclable material Support recycling & organics market development Divert all organic materials from landlls 1 Zero Waste Plan A) Develop a Zero Waste Plan to supplement statewide green waste, recycling and plastic bag ban efforts WASTE REDUCTION 1. Promote and support source reduction 2. Support of product stewardship 3. Reduce the use of toxic materials 4. Promote and educate on zero waste principles 5. Combine recycling with economic development to fuel new businesses, expand existing markets, and create jobs 6. Increase recycling and composting 7. Reduce and divert organic materials for landfills by prioritizing food waste distribution by feeding people first, then animals, followed by composting and/or anaerobic digestion, and lastly gasification 19 of our water supply comes from local sources 15% 85%imported sources Only DRAFT2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 472 1 Energy Education & Enforcement A) Expand education targeting key community segments and facilitating energy perfor- mance disclosure (eg. Green Leases, benchmarking and Home Energy Ratings) B) Leverage the building inspection process to distribute energy‐related information and to deter unpermitted, low performing energy improvements 2 Clean Energy Sources A) Incorporate solar photovoltaic into all new residential and commercial buildings B) Provide more grid‐delivered clean energy (up to 100%) through Community Choice Aggregation or other mechanism 3 Energy Efficiency Upgrades A) Expand the City’s “cool roof” standards to include re‐roofs and western areas B) Facilitate more energy upgrades in the community through incentives, permit streamlin- ing (where possible) and education C) Require energy‐savings retrofits in existing buildings at a specific point in time (not at point of sale) 4 Robust Urban Forests A) Plant more shade trees to save energy, address heat island issues and improve air quality RENEWABLE & EFFICIENT ENERGY 20 Megawatts (MW) of Solar Added in Chula VistaDRAFT 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 473 1 Complete Streets & Neighborhoods A) Incorporate “Complete Streets” principles into municipal capital projects and plans B) Encourage higher density and mixed‐use development in Smart Growth areas, especially around trolley stations and other transit nodes 2 Transportation Demand Management A) Utilize bike facilities, transit access/passes and other Transportation Demand Management and congestion management offerings B) Expand bike-sharing, car-sharing and other “last mile” transportation options 3 Alternative Fuel Vehicle Readiness A) Support the installation of more local alternative fueling stations B) Designate preferred parking for alternative fuel vehicles C) Design all new residential and commercial buildings to be “Electric Vehicle Ready” SMART GROWTH & TRANSPORTATION Recent projects that highlight the City's commitment to providing multi modal transportation options: 21 2016Bike lanes on Broadway 2015Main Street streetscape 2015Adoption of Complete Streets Policy The strategies from multiple sectors listed above (and on the previous two pages) will strive to accomplish five overarching goals: • Energy and Water Efficient Buildings • Smart Growth & Clean Transit • Zero Waste • Increase Local Energy and Water Resources • Lead by Example • Community Resilience Actions Summary 2017 Chula Vista was designated a "Bicycle Friendly Community" in 2014 F Street Promenade StudyF Street Promenade Study DRAFT2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 474 4Part 22 | CHULA VISTA CLIMATE ACTION PLAN DRAFT2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 475 Once the Plan is adopted by City Council, there remains more work to accomplish. To facili- tate keeping City leaders and stakeholders informed on implementation progress, City staff will conduct multiple efforts to increase transparency and keep the community engaged and informed. GHG Inventories Due to data availability issues, the City has not been able to conduct a community GHG inventory since 2012. As soon as the regional data issues are resolved, Chula Vista staff plan on conducting GHG inventories every two to three years. It is anticipated that these inven- tories, being a part of SANDAG’s Regional GHG Inventory Framework effort, will be stream- lined and standardized to ensure timely completion. Inventories are the best indicator of overall progress to reduce emissions. However, inventories provide little detail into the exact sources of the emissions or the progress of specific projects undertaken in the Plan. Tracking, Monitoring & Updates Inventories are the best indicator of overall progress to reduce emissions. 23 DRAFT2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 476 Implementation Progress Reports Staff will continue to track program implementation and performance metrics in a publicly available Implementation Report. The Report will include a detailed look at the progress made in implementing the strategies and actions defined in the CAP. Similar to past Implementation Progress Reports, these update reports will measure City actions, and are projected to occur every two years. Updates This Climate Action Plan is a living document. Strategies and actions included in this plan will be implemented, may become outdated or need to adjust to new technologies. Updates to the Plan will occur approximately every 5 years. This update was focused on mitigation measures but acknowledge that community resilience (adaptation) measures will need to be updated in the future. Community Engagement The CCWG, composed of residents, businesses, and community organization representatives, will continue to be called upon to assist with implementation strategies. The community engagement process has worked well for the City and citizens. Community participation is strong in many areas of Chula Vista government, such as the Local Government Partnership with San Diego Gas & Electric® that has provided long- term funding for energy efficiency efforts. The City works to celebrate that participation and encourages residents and businesses to talk about the actions they are taking to help reduce GHG emission, working toward clean air, clean water and clean land for all. The City works to celebrate that participation and encourages residents and businesses to talk about the actions they are taking to help reduce GHG emission, working towards clean air, clean water and clean land for all. 2324 Used Oil Collection Center DRAFT2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 477 The Chula Vista Clean Businesses Program celebrates the actions businesses take to achieve greater profitability through reduced costs and better environment for their employees and patrons. These actions contribute to a better community environment – reducing GHG emissions through energy efficiency and water conservation, increased recycling, diverting food waste from landfills, encouraging green commuting and driving hybrids or electric vehicles. The City’s Sustainability Commission and City Coun- cil also annually recognize those who live and work in Chula Vista for their cleaner actions through the Clean Champion Awards as part of the April Earth Month celebrations. City leaders also recognized that climate change is a larger issue than any one City can address alone. Chula Vista engaged early, and continues to engage, in multiple climate change forums and organizations that reach beyond Chula Vista’s borders in an effort to build regional, national and international support. Founding member of San Diego Reginal Energy Partnership and San Diego Regional Climate Collaborative - These groups allow us to work with the larger San Diego region to network, plan and implement programs to share knowledge and help address energy conservation and climate change. Founding member of the South Bay Energy Action Collaborative – Allows us to share our knowledge and experience addressing energy conservation with south bay neighbors. The Compact of Mayors works with the leadership of the world’s global city networks – C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group (C40), ICLEI – Local Governments for Sustainability (ICLEI) and the United Cities and Local Governments (UCLG) – with support from UN-Habitat, the UN’s lead agency on urban issues, to help build support for local climate actions. Paris Climate Conference / COP 21 – Thanks to support from ICLEI and the WWF, the Mayor of Chula Vista was able to attend the 2015 Paris Climate Conference and continue to push for international climate action while highlighting the role local governments are already playing. Chula Vista is proud to be one of the initial Cities to sign onto Climate Mayors (Mayors National Climate Action Agenda, or MNCAA) which is a network of 88 U.S. mayors – representing over 43 million Americans – working together to strengthen local efforts for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and supporting efforts for binding federal and global-level policy making. 25 FREBE Business Evaluation Bike valet at local eventsDRAFT 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 478 5PartCHULA VISTA CLIMATE ACTION PLAN APPENDIX A - Implementation Actions DRAFT2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 479 6PartCHULA VISTA CLIMATE ACTION PLAN APPENDIX B - Past Action Update DRAFT2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 480 7Part CHULA VISTA CLIMATE ACTION PLAN APPENDIX C - User Guide to ActionDRAFT 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 481 The City would like to celebrate and acknowledge the individuals who helped prepare this plan. Thank you to those who participated in the Climate Change Working Group meetings to prepare the recommendations that were adopted by City Council 2014. Your work makes Chula Vista a beautiful, clean and vibrant place to live, work and play. 2014 Climate Change Working Group Members • Sassan Rahimzadeh (former Chair), Sustainability Commission • Robert Coleman, Sustainability Commission • Ben Flores, Sustainability Commission • Ellen Kappes, Sustainability Commission • Debbie Discar-Espe, Chula Vista Charitable Foundation • Lisa Davis, Chula Vista High Tech High School • Sean Kilkenny, Otay Ranch Company (ALT: Nick Lee, Baldwin & Sons) • Todd Galarneau, Corky McMillin/CV Chamber • Rich D’Ascoli, Pacific Southwest Association of Realtors • Hugo Mora, Mocard Group Inc. • Allison Wood, San Diego Association of Governments • Len Hering, Center for Sustainable Energy (ALT: Andrea Cook) • Carlos Jaime, Republic Services • Pauline Martinson, I Love A Clean San Diego (ALT: Samantha Russo) • Josh Brock, San Diego Gas & Electric • Sue Mosburg, Sweetwater Authority City Staff Support • Economic Development Department, Office of Sustainability: Conservation Section Environmental Services Section • Public Works Department: Operations Section • Development Services Department • Engineering & Capital Improvement Department Technical Support • Nilmini Silva-Send, Energy Policy Initiatives Center (EPIC) University of San Diego • ICLEI – Local Governments for Sustainability Acknowledgements Mayor at 2015 Paris Climate Conference Funding for this Project: This initiative is part of the City of Chula Vista’s Local Government Partnership program, which is funded by California utility ratepayers and administered by San Diego Gas & Electric under the auspices of the California Public Utilities Commission.DRAFT2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 482 1 of 13 Chula Vista Climate Action Plan: Appendix A Objectives, Strategies & Implementation Actions (Last updated 8/28/17) In conjunction with the City’s updated 2017 Climate Action Plan, this appendix provides a more detailed look into the specific actions that the City will take to address the City Council adopted Climate Change Working Group (CCWG) recommendations. This appendix provides more detailed descriptions into the CAP implementation process, including the department leading each action, a time frame for its expected completion (or start if ongoing) and its most recent funding status. Each objective also lists the annual reduction in GHG MT C02 e that each objective is expected to provide in 2020 and 2035. Funding status description: Funded ‐ actions that have already been funded Ongoing ‐ actions that continue going forward and have secured funding Identified ‐ future actions that have an identified funding source Grants / Partners ‐ actions to be funded through grants or partnerships Needed ‐ funding source still needs to be identified Lead department abbreviations: DSD – Development Services Department DSD – NS ‐ Development Services Department Neighborhood Services ED ‐ Economic Development Department ED ‐ Cons. – Economic Development Department, Conservation Section ED ‐ ES – Economic Development Department Environmental Services Section Eng – Engineering & Capital Improvement Department PW‐ Ops – Public Work Department Operation Section DRAFT2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 483 2 of 13 Objective 1.1 – Water Education & Enforcement Performance Metric: Directly engage 8% of households on water conservation per year 2020 MT C02 e GHG Reductions: 37 2035 MT C02 e GHG Reductions: 43 Strategy 1. Expand education and enforcement targeting landscape water waste. Implementation Actions Funding Timeframe Lead A Offer free water evaluations and technical assistance through NatureScape & Home Upgrade, Carbon Downgrade programs Funded Ongoing ED ‐ Cons. B Prohibit all landscape irrigation runoff including incidental discharges Funded Completed Q4 ‐ 2015 PW‐Ops C Promote a hotline to identify water wasters and to target outreach Identified Q3 ‐ 2018 ED ‐ Cons. D Develop escalating enforcement policy (up to possible fine) for homes that repeatedly waste water through irrigation run off Funded Completed Q4 ‐ 2015 PW‐Ops E Create outdoor signage at City facilities to showcase efficient landscape designs Grants Q1 ‐ 2019 ED ‐ Cons. F Work with water districts to create mobile display(s) showcasing water conservation and re‐use options Funded Completed Q4 ‐ 2015 ED ‐ Cons. Objective 1.2 – Water Efficiency Upgrades Performance Metric: Retrofit 1,000 homes per year with water‐efficient devices (including landscaping) 2020 MT C02 e GHG Reductions: 6,240 2035 MT C02 e GHG Reductions: 14,261 Strategy 1. Update the City’s landscaping regulations to promote more water‐wise designs. Implementation Actions Funding Timeframe Lead A Update ordinances to establish best practices and water “budgets” for landscape designs Funded Completed DSD B Update Landscape Water Conservation Ordinance to increase efficiency (by at least 20%) Funded Completed Q4 ‐ 2015 DSD WATER CONSERVATION & REUSE DRAFT2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 484 3 of 13 C Revise Water Conservation Plan Guidelines and Landscape Manual to match new landscape requirements Funded Completed Q4 ‐ 2015 DSD Strategy 2. Require water‐savings retrofits in existing buildings at a specific point in time. Implementation Actions Funding Timeframe Lead A Require free water evaluations for businesses as part of licensing process Funded Ongoing ED ‐ Cons. B Include free retrofit evaluations in Home Upgrade, Carbon Downgrade program Funded Ongoing ED ‐ Cons. C In consultation with community stakeholders (such as Realtors) offer additional Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) programs to help finance water retrofits in community Funded Ongoing Q4 – 2015 ED ‐ Cons. D Evaluate implementation of 3.3.3D to evaluate possibilities of adding water conservation measures or information Identified Q2 ‐ 2018 DSD Objective 1.3 – Water Reuse Plan & System Installations Performance Metric: Install 3,750 water reuse systems citywide by 2020 (6,000 by 2035) 2020 MT C02 e GHG Reductions: 6,080 2035 MT C02 e GHG Reductions: 9,728 Strategy 1. Develop a Water Reuse Framework for storm water, graywater, and onsite water reclamation. Implementation Actions Funding Timeframe Lead A Complete a Water Reuse Framework to identify opportunities and barriers Funded Completed Q4 ‐ 2016 ED ‐ Cons. B Develop permitting guidance, in partnership with local water districts, for simple water reuse technologies Needed Q2 ‐ 2018 ED ‐ Cons. C Develop promotional guidance that minimizes cross contamination risk for indoor recycled water use in commercial buildings Grants/ Partners Q2 ‐ 2018 ED ‐ Cons. DRAFT2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 485 4 of 13 Strategy 2. Facilitate simple graywater systems for Laundry‐to‐Landscape applications. Implementation Actions Funding Timeframe Lead A Develop a graywater educational guide to help ensure proper installation and use Funded Completed ED ‐ Cons. B Require single‐family homes/duplexes to include simple graywater pre‐plumbing Funded Completed DSD C Host workshops and promote incentives for simple graywater systems Funded Ongoing ED ‐ Cons. D Work with water districts to create mobile display(s) showcasing water conservation and re‐use options Funded Completed Q2 ‐ 2015 ED ‐ Cons. Strategy 3. Streamline complex graywater systems permit review. Implementation Actions Funding Timeframe Lead A Work with local water districts in developing guidance and a streamlined permit for complex systems Grants/ Partners Q2 ‐ 2019 ED ‐ Cons. B Host at least two workshops for contractors and developers Identified Q1 ‐ 2018 DSD DRAFT2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 486 5 of 13 Objective 2.1 – Zero Waste Plan Performance Metric: Divert 75% of solid waste from the landfill by 2020 (90% by 2035) 2020 MT C02 e GHG Reductions: 38,126 2035 MT C02 e GHG Reductions: 48,798 Strategy 1. Develop a Zero Waste Plan to supplement statewide green waste, recycling, and plastic bag ban efforts. Implementation Actions Funding Timeframe Lead A Initiate planning for organics management to divert from landfill Funded Ongoing ED ‐ ES B Develop a Zero Waste Policy for City Council consideration Identified Q4 ‐ 2017 ED ‐ ES C Create Zero Waste guidelines for events Identified Q4 ‐ 2017 ED ‐ ES D Create Zero Waste business certifications Identified Q4 ‐ 2017 ED ‐ ES E Create Zero Waste guidelines for building deconstruction Identified Q4 ‐ 2017 ED ‐ ES F Draft "Management of Organics" policy for City Council consideration that would support the use of local compost on City and private properties. Identified Q1 ‐ 2019 ED ‐ ES WASTE REDUCTION DRAFT2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 487 6 of 13 Objective 3.1 – Energy Education & Enforcement Performance Metric: Engage 8% of households and businesses on energy conservation per year 2020 MT C02 e GHG Reductions: 1,936 2035 MT C02 e GHG Reductions: 1,936 Strategy 1. Expand education targeting key community segments and facilitate energy performance disclosure. Implementation Actions Funding Timeframe Lead A Offer free evaluations through Free Resource & Energy Business Energy Evaluations (FREBE) & Home Upgrade, Carbon Downgrade programs Funded Ongoing ED ‐ Cons. B Engage “green” business leaders through CLEAN Business program Funded Ongoing ED ‐ Cons. C Initiate community‐wide social marketing campaigns to target key segments, such as DIY, disadvantaged residents and high energy users Funded Ongoing ED ‐ Cons. D Launch a “Build Green” awareness and assistance program for builders and permit applicants Funded Ongoing DSD E Promote the use of Green Leases to commercial property owners and tenants Identified Q2 ‐ 2018 ED ‐ Cons. F Create local incentives or policies for building benchmarking and public disclosure Identified Q4 ‐ 2017 ED ‐ Cons. Strategy 2. Leverage the building inspection process to deter unpermitted, low‐performing energy improvements. Implementation Actions Funding Timeframe Lead A Initiate monthly energy code trainings for building permit and inspection staff Funded Ongoing DSD B Conduct secondary reviews of inspections to help identify common energy code errors Funded Ongoing DSD C Integrate energy and sustainability info into permit counter and/or inspection outreach materials Identified Q4 ‐ 2017 DSD D Determine if bulk or annual permit program will encourage more permitted jobs Identified Q1 ‐ 2019 DSD E Create “Build Green Chula Vista” network to support contractors, inspectors, appraisers and others who Identified Q2 ‐ 2018 DSD RENEWABLE & EFFICIENT ENERGY DRAFT2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 488 7 of 13 work with homes. F Work with state/regional partners on consumer education of the value of permits and complaints related to energy code Partner Q3 ‐ 2018 ED ‐ Cons. Objective 3.2 – Clean Energy Sources Performance Metric: Provide more than 50% of electricity from renewable sources by 2020 (70% by 2035) 2020 MT C02 e GHG Reductions: 52,121 2035 MT C02 e GHG Reductions: 62,420 Strategy 1. Incorporate solar into all new buildings to help transition to Zero Net Energy design. Implementation Actions Funding Timeframe Lead A Adopt pre‐wiring and pre‐plumbing standards for solar photovoltaic and solar hot water, respectively Funded Completed DSD B Develop a solar photovoltaic requirement for new homes and businesses for City Council consideration Identified/ Grant Q1 ‐ 2018 ED ‐ Cons. Strategy 2. Provide more grid‐delivered clean energy (up to 100%) through Community Choice Aggregation or other mechanism. Implementation Actions Funding Timeframe Lead A Conduct a CCA Feasibility Study to identify costs and benefits for City Council consideration Needed Q1 ‐ 2019 ED ‐ Cons. B Evaluate potential to partner with private sector to utilize municipal facilities for community solar projects (such as to support SDG&E’s EcoShare program) Needed Q2 ‐ 2018 ED ‐ Cons. C Promote “green” electricity credits and tariffs such as SDG&E’s EcoChoice Funded Ongoing ED ‐ Cons. DRAFT2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 489 8 of 13 Objective 3.3 – Energy Efficiency Upgrades Performance Metric: Retrofit 13% of single family & multifamily homes and 10% of commercial Sqft to save 25% by 2020 (20% of both with 50% savings by 2035) 2020 MT C02 e GHG Reductions: 9,428 2035 MT C02 e GHG Reductions: 22,432 Strategy 1. Reauthorize the City’s “cool roof” standards and expand to include re‐roofs and western areas. Implementation Actions Funding Timeframe Lead A In consultation with community stakeholders (such as Realtors) offer additional Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) programs to help finance cool roof retrofits in community Funded Completed Q4 – 2015 & Q3 ‐ 2017 ED ‐ Cons. B Review related cost‐effectiveness studies for the City’s two climate zones and determine if cool roof requirements are cost effective Identified Q2 ‐ 2018 DSD Strategy 2. Facilitate more energy upgrades in the community through incentives, permit streamlining (where possible), and education. Implementation Actions Funding Timeframe Lead A Leverage Community Development Block Grant funding for energy upgrades for low‐income households Funded Ongoing DSD B Offer expedited permitting for projects in voluntary Green Building Plus program Funded Ongoing DSD C Transition to over‐the‐counter permitting for residential solar systems Funded Completed Q3 ‐ 2015 DSD D Work with SDG&E to evaluate feasibility of a permit‐ based energy efficiency incentive Identified Q4 ‐ 2018 DSD E Evaluate if the City can allow SDG&E QA/QC program to serve as final permit inspection Identified Q4 ‐ 2018 DSD F Seek funds to subsidize expedited Cal Green Tier 1 projects Needed Q4 ‐ 2017 DSD Strategy 3. Require energy‐savings retrofits in existing buildings at a specific point in time. Implementation Actions Funding Timeframe Lead A Require free energy evaluations for businesses as part of licensing process Funded Ongoing ED ‐ Cons. B Include free retrofit evaluations in Home Upgrade, Carbon Downgrade program Funded Ongoing ED ‐ Cons. DRAFT2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 490 9 of 13 C Offer additional Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) programs to help finance energy retrofits in community Funded Completed Q4 ‐ 2015 ED ‐ Cons. D Develop Residential and Commercial Energy Conservation ordinance for City Council consideration Identified Q4 ‐ 2017 ED ‐ Cons. E Require increased energy standards on projects that receive financing from the City via Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) Identified Q2 ‐ 2018 DSD ‐ NS Objective 3.4 – Robust Urban Forests Performance Metric: Expand urban tree canopy cover to 15% by 2020 (25% by 2035) 2020 MT C02 e GHG Reductions: 7,278 2035 MT C02 e GHG Reductions: 12,678 Strategy 4. Plant more shade trees to save energy, address heat island issues, and improve air quality. Implementation Actions Funding Timeframe Lead A Develop a formal City Council policy to maximize shade tree use Funded Completed DSD B Develop an Urban Forestry Management Plan to guide shade tree plantings and maintenance Identified Q4 ‐ 2018 PW‐Ops DRAFT2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 491 10 of 13 Objective 4.1 – Complete Streets & Neighborhoods Performance Metric: Reduce average vehicle miles traveled by 4% by 2020 (5% by 2035) 2020 MT C02 e GHG Reductions: 14,106 2035 MT C02 e GHG Reductions: 16,552 Strategy 1. Incorporate “Complete Streets” principles into municipal capital projects and plans. Implementation Actions Funding Timeframe Lead A Adopt a formal Complete Streets Policy to ensure all transportation users’ needs are met Funded Completed Q1 ‐ 2015 Eng B Update Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and Tentative Map standard work to include complete streets considerations Funded Completed Q4 ‐ 2015 Eng C Combine the Bikeway/Pedestrian Master Plans into a single Active Transportation Master Plan Funded In Progress Q4 ‐ 2019 Eng D Transition Growth Management Oversight Commission (GMOC) Ordinance’s traffic threshold to more broadly account for “transportation” Identified Q4 ‐ 2018 Eng Strategy 2. Encourage higher density and mixed‐use development in Smart Growth areas, especially around trolley stations and other transit nodes. Implementation Actions Funding Timeframe Lead A Develop a specific plan for the Palomar Gateway area, including the Palomar Trolley Station Funded Completed DSD B Prepare a matrix to help determine and map targeted development locations Funded Completed Q2 2015 & ongoing (as needed) DSD C Review additional possible incentives for development in priority areas for City Council consideration Funded Completed Q2 ‐ 2016 DSD D Work with SANDAG to complete new South Bay Bus Rapid Transit service Identified Q3 ‐ 2018 Eng E Implementation of Urban Core Specific Plan (UCSP) around E Street Trolley Station Identified Q2 ‐ 2018 ED F Pursue trolley grade separation along the I‐5 corridor at E Street, F Street & H Street Identified In Progress Q1 ‐ 2020 Eng SMART GROWTH & TRANSPORTATION DRAFT2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 492 11 of 13 G Complete environmental document for trolley grade separation at Palomar Street/Industrial Blvd Funded Q3 - 2018 Eng Objective 4.2 – Transportation Demand Management Performance Metric: Increase citywide alternative commute rates to 7% by 2020 (9% by 2035) 2020 MT C02 e GHG Reductions: 44,260 2035 MT C02 e GHG Reductions: 103,363 Strategy 1. Utilize bike facilities, transit access/passes, and other Transportation Demand Management and congestion management offerings. Implementation Actions Funding Timeframe Lead A Complete Transportation Demand Management study in coordination with SANDAG Identified Q4 ‐ 2017 DSD B Update traffic signal synchronization along Olympic, East H, Telegraph Canyon and Otay Lakes roadways Identified Q1 ‐ 2019 Eng C Complete traffic signal synchronization in connection with new Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) along East Palomar Identified Q1 ‐ 2019 Eng Strategy 2. Expand bike‐sharing, car‐sharing, and other “last mile” transportation options. Implementation Actions Funding Timeframe Lead A Host workshops to promote bicycle use and safety Identified Ongoing ED ‐ Cons. B Review “last mile” transportation infrastructure (including technology‐based solutions) and propose needed programs or policies to City Council for consideration Needed Q4 ‐ 2018 Eng C Based on outcome of 4.2.2B, facilitate bike‐sharing services into the City Identified Q4 ‐ 2018 ED ‐ Cons. D Based on outcome of 4.2.2B, facilitate car‐sharing services into the City Identified Q4 ‐ 2018 ED ‐ Cons. E Continue to implement bike facilities in Bikeway Master Plan & pedestrian improvements in Pedestrian Master Plan Identified Q2 ‐ 2019 Eng DRAFT2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 493 12 of 13 Objective 4.3 – Alternative Fuel Vehicles Performance Metric: Support citywide expansion of alternative fuel vehicle use by 4% of VMT by 2020 (11% by 2035) 2020 MT C02 e GHG Reductions: 28,608 2035 MT C02 e GHG Reductions: 61,819 Strategy 1. Support the installation of more local alternative fueling stations Implementation Actions Funding Timeframe Lead A Install a 12,000‐gallon biodiesel tank at Public Works Yard Funded Completed PW‐Ops B Install a publicly‐available CNG fueling station at Public Works Yard Funded Completed PW‐Ops C Install publicly‐available electric vehicle (EV) chargers at 5 sites Funded Completed PW‐Ops D Convert transit and solid waste hauler to alternative fuel vehicles Funded Completed PW‐Ops E Facilitate electric vehicle (EV) chargers, through programs such as SDG&E’s Power Your Drive, in areas of City not currently served Identified Q4 ‐ 2018 ED ‐ Cons. F Update City’s Alternative Fuel Station map to promote fuel availability Identified Q4 ‐ 2017 ED ‐ Cons. G Convert street sweeper and tow trucks to alternative fuel vehicles Identified Q4 ‐ 2019 PW‐Ops Strategy 2. Designate preferred parking for alternative fuel vehicles. Implementation Actions Funding Timeframe Lead A Establish preferred parking for Alternative Fuel Vehicles (AFV) at public parking lots Funded Completed Q2 ‐ 2015 & ongoing (as needed) PW‐ Ops B Develop new AFV parking requirements for new commercial sites for City Council consideration Identified Q4 ‐ 2018 DSD Strategy 3. Design all new residential and commercial buildings to be “Electric Vehicle Ready.” Implementation Actions Funding Timeframe Lead A Develop an EV‐Ready ordinance for City Council consideration Funded Completed Q4 ‐ 2015 DSD DRAFT2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 494 B Integra outrea C Comple Ranch. ate EV‐Ready ch programs ete Neighborh y requireme s ood Electric V ent informat Vehicle netwo 13 of 13 ion into ork in Otay Fun Iden nded Co Q ntified Q ompleted Q4 ‐ 2015 Q2 ‐ 2019 DSD Eng DRAFT2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 495 Climate Action Plan Implementation 1 of 18 Progress Report (November 2013) CLIMATE ACTION PLAN Implementation Progress Report November 2013 OVERVIEW Since 2000, Chula Vista has been implementing a Climate Action Plan to address the threat of climate change to the local community. Over the past 5 years, this original plan has been revised to incorporate new climate mitigation (2008) and adaptation (2011) measures to strengthen the City’s climate action efforts and to facilitate the numerous community co-benefits such as utility savings, better air quality, reduced traffic congestion, local economic development, and improved quality of life. Based on available funding, staff has been implementing the 18 climate-related actions and their 57 associated components. Overall, 70% of the components have been successfully completed and/or are being implemented on an ongoing basis, which represents a 7% increase since the last reporting period. Another 26% are still being actively pursued, while only two components remain on-hold. IMPLEMENTATION PROGRESS The following report outlines the implementation progress for the 7 climate mitigation measures and the 11 climate adaptation strategies. In addition to background information and next steps, staff has highlighted whether the implementation is: Completed – All required implementation steps have been completed Ongoing – All required initial steps have been completed, but component is still actively being implemented In Progress – Implementation steps are still being developed and pursued based on the original implementation plan On-Hold – Implementation has not proceeded due to a programmatic barrier (such as funding) As directed by City Council, staff has been implementing the 18 climate-related actions and their 57 associated components based on available funding. Out of the 27 mitigation-related components, 78% have been successfully completed and/or are ongoing programs. In addition, 19% of the mitigation components are still being actively pursued. The H Street Corridor Study (under Mitigation Measure #6) continues to be the only “on-hold” strategy due to the dissolution of the City’s Redevelopment Agency. Out of the 30 adaptation-related components, 63% and 33% have been successfully completed/ongoing or are still being actively pursued, respectively. Only one component under Adaptation Strategy #9 still remains “on-hold.” Overall, the number of mitigation and adaptation components, which are completed/ongoing, has increased by 7% since the last reporting period. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 496 Climate Action Plan Implementation 2 of 18 Progress Report (November 2013) CLIMATE MITIGATION MEASURES The following (7) measures are designed to reduce greenhouse gas or “carbon” emissions from municipal operations and the broader Chula Vista community. The measures complement one another as well as state and federal climate mitigation initiatives. Overview Measure #1 directs the City to require that 100% of the replacement vehicles purchased for the municipal fleet be high efficiency (hybrid) or alternative fuel vehicles (AFVs). However, factors such as the appropriateness for the vehicle task, fueling infrastructure, petroleum displacement, and the overall cost and environmental benefit must be considered prior to purchasing each replacement vehicle. #COMPONENTS STATUS PROGRESS 1 Design and construction of a 12,000- gallon biodiesel tank at PWC Completed City’s 128 diesel-fueled vehicles (or 23% of the total fleet) have been converted to biodiesel. 2 Replace City's-fleet with AFVs or hybrids Ongoing Four new Parks Division maintenance trucks utilizing biodiesel were recently ordered and will replace conventional fuel vehicles.CLIMATE MITIGATIONMEASURE #1: 100% City-Fleet Replacement with AFVs Next Steps City vehicles will be replaced with hybrids or AFVs on an ongoing basis, as appropriate funding becomes available. By the end of Fiscal Year 2014, it is estimated that six additional alternative fuel vehicles will be purchased. MITIGATION MEASURE #1 CLEAN VEHICLE REPLACEMENT POLICY FOR CITY FLEET 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 497 Climate Action Plan Implementation 3 of 18 Progress Report (November 2013) Overview Measure #2 directs staff to work with fleets under City authority to influence their expanded use of alternative fuels and high efficiency/alternative fuel vehicles (AFV) including electric, biodiesel, ethanol, hybrid, hydrogen, and compressed natural gas (CNG) based on appropriateness for vehicle task, fueling infrastructure, petroleum displacement, overall cost, and environmental benefit. #COMPONENTS STATUS PROGRESS 1 Convert Chula Vista Transit to alternative fuels and/or high efficiency vehicles Completed 100% of Chula Vista Transit fleet have been converted to AFV. 2 Convert Solid Waste Hauler to alternative fuels and/or high efficiency vehicles Completed 100% of Allied Waste fleet have been converted to AFV. 3 Convert Street Sweeper to alternative fuels and/or high efficiency vehicles In Progress Staff will incorporate AFV requirements in the bid solicitation process when the current Street Sweeping contract expires in June 2016. 4 Convert City-contracted Tow Trucks to alternative fuels and/or high efficiency vehicles In Progress A new RFP for Tow Truck service, which includes hybrid/AFV requirements, has been finalized and is scheduled to be released in the near future. 5 Open publicly-available CNG dispenser at PWC Completed The new public CNG fuel station has dispensed over 115,000 gallons (equivalent) since October 2011.CLIMATE MITIGATIONMEASURE #2: 100% City-Contracted Clean Fleets Next Steps The City continues to work with contractors and community partners to promote local alternative fuel use and infrastructure, as outlined in the Chula Vista Clean Transportation Energy Roadmap. As such, staff is currently developing a Chula Vista-specific alternative fuel infrastructure map to distribute to community members and local car dealerships, who sell alternative fuel vehicles. MITIGATION MEASURE #2 CLEAN VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FOR CITY-CONTRACTED FLEETS 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 498 Climate Action Plan Implementation 4 of 18 Progress Report (November 2013) Overview The measure, as revised by City Council, states that businesses with storefronts or offices need to participate in a no-cost energy and water evaluation of their premises when a new business license is issued or once every 3-5 years for a renewed business license. The measure helps businesses identify efficiency opportunities at their facilities, access rebates and financing for efficiency improvements, and lower their monthly utility costs. Businesses are not required to implement any of the identified energy or water efficiency opportunities and are not required to complete evaluations for facility areas beyond their operational control (ex. whole-building systems operated and maintained by a Property Manager/Landlord). #COMPONENTS STATUS PROGRESS 1 Develop ordinance integrating energy & water evaluations into business licensing process Completed CVMC Chapter 20 was revised to include the evaluations, known as the "Free Resource & Energy Business Evaluations" (FREBE) program. 2 Complete onsite energy & water evaluations for businesses annually Ongoing To date, 687 on-site evaluations have been completed in 2013 to identify utility cost saving opportunities. 3 Link businesses, who are interested in pursuing efficiency improvements, to available rebates, incentives, & financing Ongoing The City's CLEAN Business Program is being revamped to better recognize and assist participants interested in efficiency improvements. 4 Report to City Council on collected fines from non-compliant businesses Ongoing In 2013, no businesses were out of compliance with the energy evaluation ordinance.CLIMATE MITIGATIONMEASURE #3: Business Energy Evaluations Next Steps As part of the South Bay Energy Action Collaborative (SoBEAC), Chula Vista is working with neighboring jurisdictions, SANDAG, and SDG&E to launch a new business engagement effort in 2014 to facilitate no and low-cost energy efficiency improvements. In addition, a Chula Vista-specific PACE program is expected to be available by April 2014 to help commercial property-owners finance energy efficiency, renewable energy, and water conservation upgrades. MITIGATION MEASURE #3 BUSINESS ENERGY EVALUATIONS 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 499 Climate Action Plan Implementation 5 of 18 Progress Report (November 2013) Overview Measure #4 directed staff to adopt regulations mandating new and renovated residential and non-residential projects to incorporate early the requirements of the Housing and Community Development’s California Green Building Standards Code (CalGreen) and to be more energy efficient than the 2008 Building Energy Efficiency Standards (Title 24) by a specific percentage. In addition, the measure directed staff to implement a green building awareness program and update/establish design and regulatory provisions that incorporate sustainable practices at a community-scale. #COMPONENTS STATUS PROGRESS 1 Adopt a citywide Green Building Standard Completed In fall 2009, the City adopted the 2010 CA Green Building Standards Code early with local amendments. In fall 2011, a voluntary Green Building Plus program offering expedited permitting was launched. 2 Adopt a citywide Enhanced Energy Efficiency Standard Completed In fall 2009, the City adopted an Enhanced Energy Efficiency Code. This "reach" code will expire in July 2014, when the new statewide Energy Code becomes effective. 3 Launch a Green Building Awareness program for builders, permit applicants, & the general public Ongoing In the last 6 months, two workshops were organized for developers and City staff to better understand opportunities to incorporate LEED-ND concepts into new projects. 4 Develop design guidelines for sustainable development Completed In 2011, the City incorporated sustainability criteria into its updated Air Quality Improvement Plan Guidelines and Design Manual for large and small- scale development, respectively.CLIMATE MITIGATIONMEASURE #4: Green Building Standard Next Steps City staff continues to investigate options for revising Chula Vista’s Enhanced Energy Efficiency standard in July 2014, when the new statewide Title-24 code is updated. The City has determined that the cost-effectiveness analysis software (which is required for proposing increased standards) has only recently become available and is still pending California Energy Commission approval. Therefore, staff expects to bring forward recommendations to City Council on a new Enhanced Energy Efficiency standard in the next 6 months. MITIGATION MEASURE #4 GREEN BUILDING STANDARD 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 500 Climate Action Plan Implementation 6 of 18 Progress Report (November 2013) Overview The “Solar & Energy Efficiency Conversion” program was recommended to help facilitate energy efficiency and renewable energy retrofits in the community and at municipal facilities. The community component, called the Home Upgrade, Carbon Downgrade program, is intended to help the average resident and small business overcome common institutional barriers, upfront capital costs, complicated application processes, and time constraints. The program also strives to promote local job creation and economic development by linking community participants with local contractors and vendors. Finally, Measure #5 included the implementation of a pre-wiring and pre-plumbing requirement for solar photovoltaic (PV) and solar hot water systems, respectively, in all new residential units. #COMPONENTS STATUS PROGRESS 1 Implement a Solar & Energy Efficiency Conversion program for the community Ongoing In August, City Council approved a contract with Ygrene Energy Fund to develop a Property-Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) financing district for Chula Vista residents and businesses. 2 Upgrade municipal facilities with energy efficiency & solar energy technologies Ongoing The City has completed installing almost 4,000 LED street lights along arterial roadways, which will generate over 1.7 million kWh in annual energy savings. 3 Link conversion program to local economic development Ongoing A public workshop was held in September to identify opportunities to leverage and link the future PACE financing program to local retailers and contractors. 4 Adopt pre-wiring and pre-plumbing standards for solar pv & solar hot water, respectively Completed In 2009, the City adopted the "solar ready" ordinances. To date, over 1,500 new residential units have complied with the new code.CLIMATE MITIGATIONMEASURE #5: Solar & Energy Efficiency Conversions Next Steps The City Council will be holding a public hearing in December in order to create a new “Clean Energy Community Facilities District,” which would be the legal mechanism for a local PACE program and would provide financing to residential and commercial property- owners, who are interested in energy efficiency, renewable energy, and water conservation improvements. MITIGATION MEASURE #5 SOLAR & ENERGY EFFICIENCY CONVERSION PROGRAM 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 501 Climate Action Plan Implementation 7 of 18 Progress Report (November 2013) Overview Measure #6 is intended to accomplish the remaining planning groundwork necessary to support realization of the “Smart Growth” development densities and intensities envisioned in both the General Plan and the Urban Core Specific Plan (UCSP). Specifically, the measure’s four components are focused on the areas surrounding the E Street, H Street, and Palomar Street trolley stations. #COMPONENTS STATUS PROGRESS 1 Implementation of UCSP around E Street Trolley Station In Progress Staff is continuing to work with property owners and other interested parties towards project options for E Street parcels, and will apprise the City Council when viable prospects are identified. 2 Initiate a H Street Corridor Study to better define redevelopment opportunities around the Trolley Station On-Hold Due to the dissolution of redevelopment agencies statewide, the H Street Corridor Study is on-hold indefinitely until alternative funding sources are identified. 3 Develop a specific plan for the Palomar Gateway area, including the Palomar Trolley Station Completed The Palomar Gateway specific plan was approved by City Council in August 2013 and emphasizes multi-modal, mixed-use development patterns. 4 Pursue trolley grade separation along the I-5 corridor In Progress The City and SANDAG have hired a consultant to complete environmental documents analyzing grade separation options at the Palomar Trolley Station, which should be completed in the next 18 months.CLIMATE MITIGATIONMEASURE #6: Smart Growth Around Trolley Stations Next Steps The City will continue to pursue “Smart Growth” development surrounding Chula Vista’s three Trolley Stations. SANDAG’s 2050 Regional Transportation Plan shows various grade separation projects for the Blue Line corridor, which includes E Street, H Street, & Palomar Street. With support through an EPA Smart Growth Technical Assistance grant and the SDG&E Local Government Partnership, the City expects to complete the development of the new “Climate Neighbor” tool by June 2014, which helps local developers implement sustainably designed and constructed projects using the LEED-ND framework. MITIGATION MEASURE #6 SMART GROWTH AROUND TROLLEY STATIONS 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 502 Climate Action Plan Implementation 8 of 18 Progress Report (November 2013) Overview Because water movement and treatment requires a large amount of energy (leading to GHG emissions), Measure #7 helps residents and businesses replace turf lawn areas with “WaterSmart” landscaping. Specifically, the program’s components include (1) continuation and expansion of the NatureScape program to promote water conserving and nature-friendly landscaping, (2) coupling of residential and business turf lawn replacement with the solar and energy efficiency conversion program (Measure #5), (3) converting select municipal facilities to low water use plantings and irrigation, and (4) updating various municipal landscape regulations and guidelines to comply with new state requirements and further promote outdoor water use efficiency. #COMPONENTS STATUS PROGRESS 1 Expand the NatureScape outreach program Ongoing Through the program, over 520 properties in the community have incorporated sustainable landscape practices and been certified "Backyard Wildlife Habitats." 2 Include turf lawn replacement in Home Upgrade, Carbon Downgrade program (Measure #5) In Progress In August, City Council approved a contract with Ygrene Energy Fund to develop a Property-Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) financing district, which would also support water conservation efforts. 3 Convert municipal facilities to low water use plantings & irrigation Ongoing The City is pursuing water-saving irrigation upgrades, such as rotating nozzles and "smart" controllers, at 42 locations. 4 Update landscaping ordinances to emphasize water use efficiency Completed In 2010, a revised Landscape Water Conservation Ordinance was approved by City Council that creates a water budget for new or renovated landscapes and promotes water-efficient design.CLIMATE MITIGATIONMEASURE #7: Turf Lawn Conversion Next Steps City staff continues to pursue funding sources to support turf conversions. For municipal facilities, staff continues to develop a resource reinvestment fund, in which a portion of utility savings from energy and water retrofit projects can be reinvested in similar projects. In the community, a PACE program to help finance water conservation upgrades at homes and businesses will be formally considered by City Council in December. MITIGATION MEASURE #7 TURF LAWN CONVERSION PROGRAM 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 503 Climate Action Plan Implementation 9 of 18 Progress Report (November 2013) CLIMATE ADAPTATION STRATEGIES The following (11) strategies are designed to reduce Chula Vista’s future risks and costs from expected climate change impacts such as sea level rise, more frequent wildfires and extreme heat days, and increased stress on energy and water supplies. The measures complement one another as well as state and federal climate adaptation initiatives. Overview To address climate change impacts related to the urban heat island effect (hotter ambient air temperatures), Strategy #1 is intended to incorporate reflective (or “cool paving”) into all municipal projects (parking lots and streets) and new private parking lot projects over a specific size. Cool pavements refer to a range of established and emerging paving materials, which store less heat and have lower surface temperatures compared with conventional products. Specifically, the strategy’s components include performing a comprehensive study to evaluate and test multiple reflective pavement technologies and developing options (based on the study’s results) for incorporating cool pavement technologies into municipal standards. #COMPONENTS STATUS PROGRESS 1 Conduct a "cool paving" study to evaluate options Completed A final Cool Pavement Report has been completed by external consultants and presented to City Council. 2 Develop formal standards for incorporating "cool paving" into municipal and development projects In Progress Dependent on the outcome of component #1, staff will present recommendations to City Council for consideration.CLIMATE ADAPTATIONStrategy #1: Cool Paving Next Steps Chula Vista will continue to pursue possible funding sources for a cool paving demonstration site. As such, the City is awaiting a response from the State Water Resources Control Board on whether it has been invited to submit a full grant application for its proposed “Green Alleys” project, which would repave a number of Chula Vista alleys with permeable and reflective paving materials. Staff also plans to return to City Council in 2015 with a formal cool paving policy for consideration as recommended in the recently-completed Cool Pavement Report. ADAPTATION STRATEGY #1 COOL PAVING 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 504 Climate Action Plan Implementation 10 of 18 Progress Report (November 2013) Overview To address climate change impacts related to the urban heat island effect and energy demand, Strategy #2 is intended to incorporate shade trees into all municipal improvement projects and all private development parking lot projects. Shade trees contributing to a robust urban forest act as a natural cooling mechanism for urban areas. In addition, canopy-forming trees help reduce storm water runoff, provide habitat for wildlife, and increase property values. Specifically, the strategy’s components include (1) developing a shade tree policy for future City Council consideration, (2) amending the Municipal Landscape Manual to be consistent with the new policy, and (3) ensuring that the recently-updated Design Manual is consistent with the new policy. #COMPONENTS STATUS PROGRESS 1 Develop a formal shade tree policy Completed A new City Council policy promoting the use of shade trees along streets and within municipal and private parking lots was approved in May 2012. 2 Amend the Municipal Landscape Manual to be consistent with the new shade tree policy Completed Staff has determined that updating the Municipal Landscape Manual is not necessary, because the new Shade Tree Policy and Design Manual changes are sufficient to effectively integrate shade trees into new projects. 3 Ensure that the Design Manual is consistent with the new shade tree policy Completed As part of the new Council-approved Design Manual, new development projects must incorporate shade trees and provide at least 50% shade coverage for paved areas. CLIMATE ADAPTATIONStrategy #2: Shade Trees Next Steps City staff continues to implement the City Council-adopted Shade Tree Policy, as well as the related provisions of the Design Manual, to ensure that all new development projects meet the necessary shade tree coverage standards. ADAPTATION STRATEGY #2 SHADE TREES 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 505 Climate Action Plan Implementation 11 of 18 Progress Report (November 2013) Overview Strategy #3 is intended to address climate change impacts related to the urban heat island effect and energy demand by promoting “cool roofs.” Cool roofs, which are made of highly reflective and emissive material, can remain approximately 50 to 60°F cooler compared to traditional materials, thus helping to lower ambient temperatures inside and outside of buildings. This creates a more comfortable and healthy environment for building occupants and reduces energy use for air-conditioning. To accomplish Strategy #3, City staff will further evaluate cool roofing options and propose amendments to the municipal building codes for City Council consideration. #COMPONENTS STATUS PROGRESS 1 Conduct a "cool roof" study to evaluate options Completed With the assistance of SDG&E, staff has completed a cost-benefit analysis of cool roof options, which was used to inform proposed building code revisions (component #2). 2 Develop standards for incorporating "cool roofs" into building codes Completed Since City Council adopted the cool roof ordinance in March 2012, all new residential buildings in Climate Zone 10 have had to meet the new standard.CLIMATE ADAPTATIONStrategy #3: Cool Roofs Next Steps The City will continue to implement its new cool roof requirements under the City’s broader green building standards. Local amendments to building codes expire when new California building codes take effect. As such, staff will evaluate the 2013 California Green Building Standards Code and propose local amendments for City Council consideration, when the necessary cost-effectiveness analysis software is available from the California Energy Commission. ADAPTATION STRATEGY #3 COOL ROOFS 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 506 Climate Action Plan Implementation 12 of 18 Progress Report (November 2013) Overview Expected climate change impacts could limit imported water availability, increase utility costs for residents and businesses, and lead to higher demand for local water sources. As such, Strategy #4 is intended to educate the community about the benefits and appropriate uses of local water supplies and further integrate recycled water/onsite water reuse systems into new development. Specifically, components include (1) evaluating municipal building code options to incorporate single-source graywater “stub-outs” in new residential buildings and indoor recycled water in new commercial buildings, (2) developing an educational guide about proper graywater use, (3) creating an incentive (using external funding sources) to promote onsite water reuse, and (4) updating the City’s water-related plans to reference and promote recycled water and onsite water reuse systems. #COMPONENTS STATUS PROGRESS 1 Develop standards for incorporating graywater stub-outs (residential) and indoor recycled water use (commercial) Completed New graywater codes were adopted by City Council at their May 7, 2013 meeting. 2 Develop a graywater educational guide to help ensure proper use Completed The City's WaterSmart Landscaping Guide & Checklist were updated to incorporate water reuse information such as rainwater harvesting and simple graywater systems. 3 Create an onsite water reuse incentive program In Progress Graywater and rainwater harvesting systems have been included as eligible improvements under the proposed PACE financing program. 4 Update water-related municipal guidelines & plans to promote graywater In Progress Based on the outcome of component #1, municipal guidelines will be updated to be consistent with new graywater and other water reuse policies.CLIMATE ADAPTATIONStrategy #4: Local Water Supply & Reuse Next Steps City staff will work with the Otay Water District to further investigate the feasibility and to identify any health concerns regarding indoor use of recycled water. Based on the results, City staff will prepare recommendations for City Council’s consideration. ADAPTATION STRATEGY #4 LOCAL WATER SUPPLY & REUSE 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 507 Climate Action Plan Implementation 13 of 18 Progress Report (November 2013) Overview Climate change will likely alter regional precipitation patterns, thus altering water runoff and sediment movement flows through local watersheds. Because of urbanization and its associated activities, pollutants are discharged with these flows into the City’s storm drainage systems, creeks, rivers, San Diego Bay, and the ocean and reduce the beneficial uses of these water bodies for the Chula Vista community. Strategy #5 is intended to revise the City’s storm water regulations and applicable municipal codes to efficiently manage higher concentrations of pollutants in urban runoff by minimizing water waste, using natural landscapes to help drain or reuse runoff, and by ensuring that irrigations systems are properly installed and maintained. #COMPONENTS STATUS PROGRESS 1 Develop revisions to the municipal code to prohibit excessive landscape over- irrigation resulting in urban runoff Completed Code revisions were adopted by City Council at their November 20, 2012 meeting. 2 Encourage the beneficial reuse of pipe flushing water at construction sites Completed A brochure entitled "Guidelines for Water Conservation on Construction Sites" has been developed and is being distributed to developers and contractors working in Chula Vista. 3 Develop incentives promoting Low Impact Development (LID) design concepts In Progress Non-monetary incentives to incorporate LID features into development projects are being considered through a collaboration between Land Development and Storm Water Management staff. 4 Conduct a feasibility study for the beneficial reuse of dry weather flow sources In Progress A design has been created for the capture, treatment, and reuse of dry weather flow at Hilltop Park.CLIMATE ADAPTATIONStrategy #5: Storm Water Pollution Prevention & Reuse Next Steps For component #4, staff will further develop the Hilltop Park Storm Water Reuse Project by investigating potential water right issues with the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board and by seeking funding to implement the project, if determined to be feasible. ADAPTATION STRATEGY #5 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION & REUSE 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 508 Climate Action Plan Implementation 14 of 18 Progress Report (November 2013) Overview The frequency and intensity of wildfires and extreme heat events is expected to increase due to local climate change impacts. These events could lead to greater public safety (loss of life and property) and health concerns (poor air quality and infectious disease transmittal). The strategies are designed to educate the general public and the business community about the impacts of climate change using existing City and community partner outreach mechanisms with a special emphasis on making homes more resilient to wildfires, incorporating poor air quality day notifications, and educating businesses about employee heat illness risks. In addition, extreme heat events will be added as a significant emergency to the City’s public safety plans with a special emphasis on serving vulnerable populations and supporting a robust network of energy-secured “Cooling Centers.” #COMPONENTS STATUS PROGRESS 1 Expand community wildfire education Ongoing The City launched its new "Ready, Set, GO!" campaign, which is a comprehensive outreach program designed to promote wildifre prevention & preparedness. 2 Revise emergency plans to include extreme heat events In Progress The City has begun working with the County's Office of Emergency Services on updating the Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan, as appropriate. 3 Establish a procedure for notifying the community about poor air quality & extreme heat days Completed City staff now receives and forwards air quality notifications from the San Diego County Air Pollution Control District through the City's Nixle community messaging system.CLIMATE ADAPTATIONStrategy #6: Education & WildfiresStrategy #7: Extreme Heat Plans Next Steps City staff will continue to implement its community education and notification programs related to wildfires and extreme heat days. The City’s Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan will be revised in 2015, as part of its regularly-scheduled update, to include extreme weather events. ADAPTATION STRATEGIES #6 & #7 EDUCATION & WILDFIRES EXTREME HEAT PLANS 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 509 Climate Action Plan Implementation 15 of 18 Progress Report (November 2013) Overview Chula Vista’s open space areas include landscaped areas within developments, parks and recreation areas, and open space that has been set aside as a preserve for sensitive biological resources. In order to assess and reduce impacts associated with climate change on parks and open space and their associated ecosystems, Strategy #8 is intended to seek opportunities for the City to partner with the Resource Agencies, non-profit organizations, and/or adjacent public land managers to monitor and manage/restore ecosystems to ensure long-term habitat connectivity, species resilience, and community recreational opportunities. #COMPONENTS STATUS PROGRESS 1 Integrate climate change-related biological monitoring into Otay Ranch Preserve's Management Plan & Annual Work Plans In Progress Staff is working with the San Diego Foundation to review potential monitoring protocols to integrate into preserve management activities. 2 Update the Otay Valley Regional Park (OVRP) Concept Plan to incorporate climate-resilient design & educational guidelines In Progress Chula Vista will be proposing to the OVRP Executive Mgmt Team to include climate-resilient updates to the OVRP Concept Plan as part of the FY14 Joint Staff Work Plan. 3 Convert landscaped areas in open space districts to water-saving plants, mulch, & irrigation systems Ongoing The Open Space Division has installed 95 web-based, "smart" irrigation controllers with plans to install another 80 smart controllers by the end of fiscal year.CLIMATE ADAPTATIONStrategy #8: Open Space Management Next Steps As funding is available, the City and its OVRP partners will implement the Concept Plan amendments, which would address climate change impacts and vulnerabilities. ADAPTATION STRATEGY #8 OPEN SPACE MANAGEMENT 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 510 Climate Action Plan Implementation 16 of 18 Progress Report (November 2013) Overview Expected local climate change impacts include precipitation variability and sea level rise that will stress riparian wetlands and estuarine wetlands, respectively. As a result, the locations where the temperature, moisture, and other environmental conditions are suitable for wetlands and their associated species will shift. In order to reduce these impacts, Strategy #9 is intended to ensure that, when preserving or restoring coastal and riparian wetland, the City take steps to incorporate adequate upland or transition habitats to accommodate shifts in wetlands coverage and help ensure public access due to sea level rise and other climate change impacts. Specifically, components include (1) evaluating the feasibility of monitoring local wetlands species ranges and abundances in response to climate change impacts, (2) incorporate wetlands “migration” in habitat management and restoration design criteria in the future Bayfront Natural Resources Management Plan (NRMP), and (3) revise the OVRP Habitat Restoration Plan and Non-native Plant Removal Guidelines to include strategies for climate change adaptation issues. #COMPONENTS STATUS PROGRESS 1 Evaluate potential to monitor local wetlands' biological health to assess climate change impacts In Progress Staff is working with the San Diego Foundation to review potential monitoring protocols to integrate into wetlands management activities. 2 Incorporate climate change & sea level rise concepts in Bayfront NRMP In Progress The draft NRMP was released in June 2013 and includes strategies to ensure that bayfront habitats and species are resilient to climate change impacts such as sea level rise. 3 Amend OVRP Habitat Restoration & Non- Native Plant Removal Plans to promote climate resiliency On-Hold The City and its OVRP Partners will continue to seek funding necessary to proceed with the proposed OVRP plans' amendments.CLIMATE ADAPTATIONStrategy #9: Wetlands Preservation Next Steps In coordination with the Port of San Diego and the Bayfront Wildlife Advisory Group, staff expects to finalize the NRMP and its associated climate adaptation strategies by early 2014. The City will also, as funding permits, continue working with its OVRP partners to amend the Plans and Guidelines used for trail planning to incorporate climate adaption strategies. ADAPTATION STRATEGY #9 WETLANDS PRESERVATION 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 511 Climate Action Plan Implementation 17 of 18 Progress Report (November 2013) Overview Over the next 40 years, sea level rise rates are expected to increase with local sea levels 12 to 18 inches higher than their current levels. Higher sea levels can result in increased erosion, more frequent flooding and property damage, loss of wetland habitats, and fewer waterfront public access options. As such, Strategy #10 directs the City to amend its land development codes and CEQA guidelines to incorporate climate change-related sea level rise into future development and municipal infrastructure projects’ design and review. Specifically, the components include (1) revising the grading ordinance to consider a project’s vulnerability to future sea level rise and flooding events, (2) modifying the Subdivision Manual to ensure that storm water/drainage infrastructure can address future sea level rise and flooding impacts, and (3) ensuring that environmental review and CEQA procedures are consistent with these changes. #COMPONENTS STATUS PROGRESS 1 Revise the grading ordinance to address increased rates of sea level rise Completed An ordinance revising Municipal Code 15.04 was adopted by City Council to address coastal development and sea level rise concerns. 2 Modify Subdivision Manual to ensure proper drainage with higher sea levels Completed In March 2012, City Council approved revisions to the Subdivision Manual, which require 16" of sea level rise to be used for evaluating projects within tidally influenced areas. 3 Ensure CEQA review procedures are consistent with new sea level-related land development guidelines Completed The new sea level rise requirements (components #1 & #2) have been incorporated into the environmental document preparation process. CLIMATE ADAPTATIONStrategy #10: Sea Level Rise & Land Development Codes Next Steps At this time, the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) has not provided additional guidance on sea level rise issues under CEQA. However, OPR expects to begin updating the statewide CEQA Guidelines for sea level rise impacts in late 2013. As such, City staff will continue to monitor the development of statewide CEQA Guidelines to ensure that Chula Vista is consistent with any new requirements. ADAPTATION STRATEGY #10 SEA LEVEL RISE & LAND DEVELOPMENT CODES 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 512 Climate Action Plan Implementation 18 of 18 Progress Report (November 2013) Overview Climate change impacts create new issues that local communities and, in particular, businesses need to address and prepare for in order to reduce future risks and costs. These issues can include higher insurance premiums due to greater flooding or wildfire risks, more expensive utility costs due to higher energy and water demand, and lower productivity due to more employee sick days from frequent extreme heat and poor air quality days. As such, Strategy #11 is designed to provide assistance and non-monetary incentives to help businesses manage climate change risks and to attract businesses that provide “green” products or services into Chula Vista. Specifically, the components include (1) revising the municipal purchasing policy to more robustly promote the procurement of “green” products and services, especially from local Chula Vista businesses, (2) revising existing business outreach programs to include recommendations on how they can reduce future climate change risks, and (3) continuing the recruitment and retention of “green” businesses and manufacturers in Chula Vista. #COMPONENTS STATUS PROGRESS 1 Revise "green" procurement policy & process Completed The City's new office supply contract includes specifications for environmentally-friendly products and procurement liaisons in each department have been trained, as appropriate. 2 Modify business outreach programs to include information on reducing climate change risks Completed Both the CLEAN Business and FREBE checklists have been updated to include info on business-related climate adaptation strategies. 3 Continue recruiting & retaining "green" businesses Ongoing The City's CLEAN Business Program is being revamped to better recognize and assist participants interested in efficiency improvements.CLIMATE ADAPTATIONStrategy #11: Green Economy Next Steps In 2014, the Economic Development Division will begin implementing its Council-approved business recruitment plan, which includes strategies to better attract and retain clean technology-oriented companies. ADAPTATION STRATEGY #11 GREEN ECONOMY 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 513 1 of 10 Chula Vista Climate Action Plan: Appendix C User Guide to Action (DRAFT II: Last updated 9/5/17) This appendix is intended to complement the City’s updated 2017 Climate Action Plan and provide information that can help residents and business take action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) and help create Clean Land, Clean Air and Clean Water. The City strives to take municipal actions and create community policies that reduce GHG emissions but there are still many actions that residents and business can take. This guide is designed to provide information readers can use to learn more about available resources for each strategy in the 2017 CAP. The City does not support or endorse any non‐City companies or organizations listed below and would encourage any resident or businesses to seek multiple companies or organizations to provide information on your potential projects. Objective 1.1 – Water Education & Enforcement Performance Metric: Directly engage 8% of households on water conservation per year Strategy 1. Expand education and enforcement targeting landscape water waste. Agency/Program Description Contact Information Otay Water District Water District for Eastern Chula Vista, offers water audits, rebates and water conservation education (619) 670‐2222 customerservice@otaywater.gov Website: www.otaywater.gov/conservation/for‐your‐home Sweetwater Authority Water District for Western Chula Vista, offers water audits, rebates and water conservation education (619) 409‐6779 waterefficiency@sweetwater.org Website: www.sweetwater.org/192/Water‐Efficiency‐Information San Diego County Water Authority Regional water supplier, offers water audits, rebates and water conservation education (858) 522‐6600 Website: www.watersmartsd.org WATER CONSERVATION & REUSE DRAFT2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 514 2 of 10 Objective 1.2 – Water Efficiency Upgrades Performance Metric: Retrofit 1,000 homes per year with water‐efficient devices (including landscaping) Strategy 1. Update the City’s landscaping regulations to promote more water‐wise designs. Agency/Program Description Phone City of Chula Vista Information from the City about the updated Landscape Water Conservation Ordinance as well as resources such as the WaterSmart Landscaping & Water Reuse Guide and sample water efficient landscape plans (619) 409‐3893 Website: www.chulavistaca.gov/departments/public‐works/environmental‐fiscal‐ sustainability/conservation/water‐conservation‐reuse San Diego County Water Authority A series of videos will take you step‐by‐step through the process of creating your very own beautiful, water‐ efficient landscape NA Website: www. www.landscapemakeover.watersmartsd.org/elearning San Diego County Water Authority $1.75 per square foot rebate for qualified applicants who replace water‐intensive turf grass with landscaping that provides several environmental benefits NA Website: https://slpincentives.watersmartsd.org/ Strategy 2. Require water‐savings retrofits in existing buildings at a specific point in time. Agency/Program Description Phone City of Chula Vista Sign up for a no‐cost Home Energy & Water Check‐Up, where a trained City staff will take a quick (15 minute) walk through of your home to identify how to save water (619) 409‐3893 Website: https://www.chulavistaca.gov/departments/clean/home‐check‐up‐signing‐sheet PACE Financing Utilize one of the PACE providers listed below to finance water conservation improvements to your building See below California FIRST: www.californiafirst.org - 844-589-7953 Ygrene Works: www.ygreneworks.com - 877-819-4736 Hero: www.heroprogram.com - 855-437-6411 DRAFT2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 515 3 of 10 Objective 1.3 – Water Reuse Plan & System Installations Performance Metric: Install 3,750 water reuse systems citywide by 2020 (6,000 by 2035) Strategy 1. Develop a Water Reuse Framework for storm water, graywater, and onsite water reclamation. Agency/Program Description Phone City of Chula Vista Water Stewardship Plan adopted by City Council November 2016 (619) 409‐3893 Website: www.chulavistaca.gov/Home/ShowDocument?id=14439 Strategy 2. Facilitate simple graywater systems for Laundry‐to‐Landscape applications. Agency/Program Description Phone City of Chula Vista WaterSmart Landscaping & Water Reuse Guide provides information about how to set up a laundry‐to‐ landscape graywater system. (619) 409‐3893 Website: http://www.chulavistaca.gov/home/showdocument?id=5365 Strategy 3. Streamline complex graywater systems permit review. Agency/Program Description Phone TBD Website: DRAFT2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 516 4 of 10 Objective 2.1 – Zero Waste Plan Performance Metric: Divert 75% of solid waste from the landfill by 2020 (90% by 2035) Strategy 1. Develop a Zero Waste Plan to supplement statewide green waste, recycling, and plastic bag ban efforts. Agency/Program Description Phone City of Chula Vista Guide to recycling in Chula Vista (619) 691‐5122 Website: http://www.chulavistaca.gov/departments/public‐works/environmental‐fiscal‐ sustainability/environmental‐services/recycling City of Chula Vista Guide to Composting, including the Master Composting Class (619) 691‐5122 Website: http://www.chulavistaca.gov/departments/public‐works/environmental‐fiscal‐ sustainability/environmental‐services/composting City of Chula Vista Guide to disposal of Household Hazardous Waste (800) 237‐2583 Website: http://www.chulavistaca.gov/departments/public‐works/environmental‐fiscal‐ sustainability/environmental‐services/hazardous‐waste I love A Clean San Diego Local non‐profit with resources for a zero waste, litter‐ free, and environmentally engaged San Diego region. (619) 691‐5122 Website: http://www.ilacsd.org WASTE REDUCTION DRAFT2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 517 5 of 10 Objective 3.1 – Energy Education & Enforcement Performance Metric: Directly engage 8% of households on energy conservation per year Strategy 1. Expand education targeting key community segments and facilitate energy performance disclosure. Agency/Program Description Phone City of Chula Vista ‐ FREBE Free Resource & Energy Business Energy Evaluations (FREBE) – provides no cost energy evaluations for Chula Vista Businesses (619) 409‐3893 Website: www.chulavistaca.gov/departments/public‐works/environmental‐fiscal‐ sustainability/conservation/renewable‐efficient‐energy‐businesses City of Chula Vista – CLEAN Business The Chula Vista CLEAN Business program helps businesses in Chula Vista make green choices and promotes their successes (619) 409‐1975 Website: www.chulavistaca.gov/departments/clean/clean‐business‐program SDREP Benchmarking Coach The Center for Sustainable Energy, on behalf of the San Diego Regional Energy Partnership (SDREP), provides no‐cost, one‐on‐one technical support to help building owners and operators in San Diego County benchmark their building energy usage (619) 409‐1975 Website: www.energycenter.org/sdrep/benchmarking Strategy 2. Leverage the building inspection process to deter unpermitted, low‐ performing energy improvements. Agency/Program Description Phone City of Chula Vista – Build Green Online resource to help developers in the City build clean and sustainable (619) 407‐3552 Website: www.chulavistaca.gov/departments/development‐services/building/build‐green Energy Code Ace Free energy code training, tools and resources to understand and meet the energy development requirements NA Website: http://energycodeace.com/ RENEWABLE & EFFICIENT ENERGY DRAFT2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 518 6 of 10 Objective 3.2 – Clean Energy Sources Performance Metric: Provide more than 50% of electricity from clean sources by 2020 (70% by 2035) Strategy 1. Incorporate solar into all new buildings to help transition to Zero Net Energy design. Agency/Program Description Phone City of Chula Vista – Online Solar Permit Online permitting information for new solar projects (will be updated with information about solar requirement) (619) 691‐5272 Website: www.chulavistaca.gov/departments/development‐services/build‐green/residential‐solar‐ energy Strategy 2. Provide more grid‐delivered clean energy (up to 100%) through Community Choice Aggregation or other mechanism. Agency/Program Description Phone SDG&E – Eco Choice A renewable energy rate from SDG&E that allows you to purchase, for a premium, up to 100% renewable energy (800) 411‐7343 Website: www.sdge.com/environment/connected‐to‐the‐sun/ecochoice Grid Alternative A non‐profit organization that brings together community partners, volunteers and job trainees to implement solar power and energy efficiency for low‐ income families (619) 239‐4743 Website: www.gridalternatives.org/ Objective R&EE‐3 – Energy Efficiency Upgrades Performance Metric: Retrofit 13% of SF & MF homes and 10% of commercial Sqft to save 25% by 2020 (20% of both with 50% savings by 2035) Strategy 1. Reauthorize the City’s “cool roof” standards and expand to include re‐ roofs and western areas. Agency/Program Description Phone EPA – Energy Star Information about Cool Roofs and how they save energy NA Website: www.energystar.gov/products/building_products/roof_products/cool_roofs_emissivity DRAFT2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 519 7 of 10 Strategy 2. Facilitate more energy upgrades in the community through incentives, permit streamlining (where possible), and education. Agency/Program Description Phone City of Chula Vista – Green Training List of upcoming trainings and downloadable presentation on clean building topics (619) 691‐5272 Website: www.chulavistaca.gov/departments/development‐services/building/training Strategy 3. Require energy‐savings retrofits in existing buildings at a specific point in time. PACE Financing Utilize one of the PACE providers listed below to finance energy conservation improvements to your building See below California FIRST: www.californiafirst.org - 844-589-7953 Ygrene Works: www.ygreneworks.com - 877-819-4736 Hero: www.heroprogram.com - 855-437-6411 City of Chula Vista Sign up for a no‐cost Home Energy & Water Check‐Up, where a trained City staff will take a quick (15 minute) walk through of your home to identify how to save energy (619) 409‐3893 Website: https://www.chulavistaca.gov/departments/clean/home‐check‐up‐signing‐sheet Objective R&EE‐4 – Robust Urban Forests Performance Metric: Expand urban tree canopy cover to 15% by 2020 (25% by 2035) Strategy R&EE‐4A Plant more shade trees to save energy, address heat island issues, and improve air quality. Agency/Program Description Phone City of Chula Vista – Urban Forestry Information about the City’s Tree Ordinance (619) 397‐6000 Website: www.chulavistaca.gov/departments/public‐works/operations/urban‐forestry DRAFT2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 520 8 of 10 Objective 4.1 – Complete Streets & Neighborhoods Performance Metric: Reduce average vehicle miles traveled by 4% by 2020 (5% by 2035) 2020 MT C02 e GHG Reductions: 14,106 2035 MT C02 e GHG Reductions: 16,552 Strategy 1. Incorporate “Complete Streets” principles into municipal capital projects and plans. Agency/Program Description Phone City of Chula Vista Complete streets policy (619) 691‐5101 Website: www.chulavistaca.gov/home/showdocument?id=11208 Strategy 2. Encourage higher density and mixed‐use development in Smart Growth areas, especially around trolley stations and other transit nodes. Agency/Program Description Phone City of Chula Vista ‐ Planning Urban Core Specific Plan (619) 691‐5101 Website: www.chulavistaca.gov/home/showdocument?id=11468 City of Chula Vista ‐ Planning Palomar Gateway Specific Plan (619) 691‐5101 Website: www.chulavistaca.gov/home/showdocument?id=7356 Objective 4.2 – Transportation Demand Management Performance Metric: Increase citywide alternative commute rates to 7% by 2020 (9% by 2035) 2020 MT C02 e GHG Reductions: 44,260 2035 MT C02 e GHG Reductions: 103,363 Strategy 1. Utilize bike facilities, transit access/passes, and other Transportation Demand Management offerings. SANDAG – iCommunte iCommute is the Transportation Demand Management (TDM) program for the San Diego region and provides carpool and ride‐matching services, a subsidized vanpool program, transit solutions, regional support for biking, the Guaranteed Ride Home program, information about call 511 and say “iCommute” SMART GROWTH & TRANSPORTATION DRAFT2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 521 Website: ht Strate Agency/ City of Ch Plan Website: ww City of Ch Plan Website: ww Objective 4 Performanc 2020 (11% b 2020 M Strate Agency/ City of Ch Conser Website: ht Strate Strate Agency/ State of C Vehicle Reb Website: ht tps://www.ic egy 2. Program ula Vista ‐ ning ww.chulavista ula Vista ‐ ning ww.chulavista 4.3 – Alterna ce Metric: Su by 2035) MT C02 e GHG egy 1. Program ula Vista ‐ rvation tp://38.106.5 egy 2. egy 3. Program CA ‐ Clean bate Project tps://cleanve teleworkin support for commutesd.c Expand b options. Descriptio Bikeway M aca.gov/depa Pedestrian aca.gov/depa tive Fuel Ve upport cityw G Reduction Support t Descriptio Alternativ 5.202/Home/ Designate Design all Ready.” Descriptio Promotes c to $7,000 f emission ve and fuel ce ehiclerebate.o g, and bike a r schools. om/ ike‐sharing, on Master Plan artments/pub n Master Pla artments/pub ehicles wide expansio s: 14,617 the installati on ve Fuel Statio /ShowDocume e preferred l new reside on clean vehicle for the purcha ehicles, includ ell vehicles org 9 of 10 nd pedestrian car‐sharing blic‐works/ma an blic‐works/ma on of alterna 2 ion of more ons Map ent?id=5375 parking for a ential and co adoption by ase or lease o ding electric, n safety prog g, and other aster‐plans/b aster‐plans/p ative fuel ve 2035 MT C02 local altern alternative ommercial b offering reba of new, eligib plug‐in hybri ram “last mile” bikeway‐mast pedestrian‐ma ehicle use by 2 e GHG Redu native fuelin fuel vehicle buildings to ates of up le zero‐ id electric transportat Phon (619) 691 ter‐plan (619) 691 aster‐plan y 4% of VMT uctions: 65,1 g stations Phon (619) 409 s. be “Electric Phon 866‐984‐ ion ne 1‐5101 1‐5101 by 96 ne 9‐3893 Vehicle ne ‐2532 DRAFT2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 522 10 of 10 Objective NA While these actions are not specifically called out in the 2017 Climate Action Plan they represent best practices commonly taken to measure and reduce GHG emissions. Agency/Program Description Phone Cool California GHG emission calculator that allows you to estimate the carbon footprint caused by your actions NA Website: www.coolcalifornia.org/calculator‐households‐individuals UC Berkeley Consumption‐Based GHG emission calculators allow you to estimate full life cycle emissions, that include emission created in the resource extraction and disposal of the products used. NA Website: http://coolclimate.berkeley.edu/inventory San Diego Airport – The Good Traveler An GHG offset program that allows you to offset GHG emissions from travel that you have to take NA Website: https://www.thegoodtraveler.org Donated GHG offsets were used to help offset the emissions created in the development and production of the 2017 CAP, see full certification below. MORE REDUCTION ACTIVITIES DRAFT2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 523 April 14, 2017 Sustainability Commission Members Jaime, Kappes, Mora, Rahimzadeh, Romo, and Valen 276 4th Ave Chula Vista, CA 91910 RE: Recommendations for City of Chula Vista Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update Dear Members of the Sustainability Commission, Climate Action Campaign is an environmental nonprofit organization with a simple mission: to stop climate change and protect our quality of life. We are committed to helping cities in San Diego pass and implement successful Climate Action Plans that achieve 100% clean energy and protect the people and places we love for generations to come. We are pleased to submit our comments on the Draft Update of the City of Chula Vista’s Climate Action Plan (CAP). First, we thank you for pioneering climate action in San Diego County with your CO2 Reduction Plan in the year 2000, Climate Mitigation Plans (2008), and Climate Adaptation Plans (2011). In the CAP Update, we commend you for the inclusion of a 90% waste reduction goal and of extensive water conservation and reuse measures. In recent years, we have seen a huge momentum shift in the region toward proactive planning for climate change, and many cities in San Diego County and across the country have made great strides to join the modern era of climate action planning. For example, 25 American cities, including Del Mar, San Diego, San Francisco, and San Jose, have committed to 100% Clean Energy. In San Diego County, two cities are pursuing CCA, six have legally binding CAPs, and San Diego and Carlsbad have ambitious Mode Shift Goals of 50% and 32%, respectively, using alternative transportation by 2035. In fact, there is legislation at the state by Senate Pro Tem Kevin de León to transition all of California to 100% renewable energy by 2045. We wish to see Chula Vista keep stride with the progress of cities across the region, as well as the state. To that end, we offer the following recommendations to strengthen the CAP Update. Renewable and Efficient Energy Recommendation 1: Include a 100% Clean Energy Goal Climate Action Campaign | 4452 Park Blvd. Suite 209, San Diego, CA 92116 | 619-419-1222 info@climateactioncampaign.org | www.ClimateActionCampaign.org 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 524 The CAPs of the cities of San Diego and Del Mar commit to 100% clean energy by the year 2035. In addition, as noted previously, California Senate Leader Kevin de León has introduced legislation to transition the entire state to 100% clean energy by 2045. By contrast, Objective REE-2 states, “Provide 53% of electricity from clean sources by 2020 (70% by 2035).” We recommend instead a 100% clean energy goal, which closely aligns with California Executive Orders B-30-15 and S-3-05 (in fact, for cities that tie their Climate Plans to their General Plan updates it is often the only way to hit long-term state GHG targets). By embracing a 100% clean energy future, all families of Chula Vista will benefit from a greener grid because renewable energy helps clean the air, builds healthy communities, and spurs local investment and well-paying jobs from clean energy technologies. In addition, adding a 100% clean energy goal in Chula Vista would signal a region-wide commitment to the shift to renewables. It is increasingly clear that 100% clean energy is the future in California and across the nation: the City of Chula Vista’s CAP Update should reflect a commitment to keep pace with the region and the state, and position Chula Vista as one of the state and country’s clean energy leaders Recommendation 2: Prioritize Community Choice Aggregation (CCA) We commend Chula Vista for considering CCA as a strategy to achieve the Renewable & Efficient Energy goals. CCA brings local control and freedom of energy choice to families while having the potential to drastically reduce GHG emissions. It is quickly becoming standard practice in Northern California and has gained traction in Southern California as well, with operational programs in Marin, Napa, Sonoma, San Francisco, and San Mateo Counties as well as in select cities in Los Angeles, Contra Costa, and Santa Clara Counties -- representing 63 cities and 8 counties, and more coming online soon. CCA is the single most effective tool we have to reduce emissions at the local level. In the City of San Diego, for example, a CCA program will be responsible for 42% of GHG emissions reductions from local actions by 2030, and 63% by 2035. According to the Draft Update, the figures are similar in Chula Vista. Given the significance of CCA’s contribution to meeting cities’ climate goals, Chula Vista should take decisive and immediate action to move forward with a Technical/Feasibility Study. We recommend funding a Technical/Feasibility Study by Q1 of 2018 at the latest, instead of Q1 of 2019 as stated in the Draft Update. Because it is the most powerful strategy to meet climate goals at the local level, CCE should be among the highest priority programs in the CAP Update. Climate Action Campaign | 4452 Park Blvd. Suite 209, San Diego, CA 92116 | 619-419-1222 info@climateactioncampaign.org | www.ClimateActionCampaign.org 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 525 Smart Growth & Transportation Recommendation 3: Clarify Mode Share Targets for Walking, Biking, and Transit Currently the performance metric for SG&T-2 - Transportation Demand Management, states the intention to “[i]ncrease citywide alternative commute rates by 7% by 2020 (30% by 2035).” The language of this metric is unclear because it does not state the baseline on which growth will be measured, nor does it articulate mode share targets for walking, biking, and transit. We recommend you clarify this performance metric 1) by stating the percent to which the alternative commute rate will increase, and 2) specifying mode share targets that would enable the city to meet its overall alternative transportation targets. For example, the City of San Diego states its goal as, “Achieve mass transit mode share of 12% by 2020 and 25% by 2035 in Transit Priority Areas,” “Achieve walking commuter mode share of 4% by 2020 and 7% by 2035 in Transit Priority Areas,” and, “Achieve 6% bicycle commuter mode share by 2020 and 18% mode share by 2035 in Transit Priority Areas.” Articulating those goals clearly allows the development of aligned strategies to ensure goals are met. Mode share goals also help municipalities plan and budget to facilitate a shift away from car-centric growth, as well as advocate for assistance for better transit infrastructure. Finally, they can also help communities plan for anticipated or desired health outcomes. Environmental Justice/Social Equity Recommendation 4: Include an Environmental Justice/Social Equity Section in Updated CAP While climate change impacts everyone, it hits hardest in low-income and communities of color that face a disproportionate pollution burden. The State of California has recognized the challenges facing Environmental Justice communities and prioritized those areas for allocation of Cap and Trade funds. San Diego is the first city in California to adopt a CAP that utilizes a statewide monitoring tool called CalEnviroScreen, which identifies vulnerable communities and can be used to direct investment and benefits to these neighborhoods. According to this tool, four of Chula Vista’s census tracts rank among the 25% most disadvantaged communities in the state based on population characteristics and pollution burden. This presents Chula Vista with the opportunity to obtain funding for programs in these communities. We recommend that Chula Vista’s updated plan include an Environmental Justice section that utilizes CalEnviroScreen to prioritize populations hit first and worst by climate change. Programs in EJ communities might include ensuring all populations in the City have access to solar energy, home energy efficiency upgrades, and green spaces. Lastly, the city should address how CAP strategies can create good-paying jobs for residents and improve quality of life in neighborhoods throughout the City. Climate Action Campaign | 4452 Park Blvd. Suite 209, San Diego, CA 92116 | 619-419-1222 info@climateactioncampaign.org | www.ClimateActionCampaign.org 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 526 Binding Commitment Recommendation 5: Make the CAP Legally Binding A legally binding plan is not subject to the vagaries of political whim or will. Rather, it is a stated commitment to the public that the City will do everything in its power to protect and preserve the future for Chula Vista families. Currently, six cities in San Diego County have legally binding CAPs: the City of San Diego, San Marcos, Carlsbad, National City, Vista, and Escondido. In addition, La Mesa and the County of San Diego must tie their emissions targets to measurable and enforceable strategies in their revised CAPs. Climate Action Planning throughout the region has shifted to favor legally binding plans that signal bold leadership on climate change. We urge The City of Chula Vista to make a similarly strong statement of support for current and future generations of Chula Vista families by making the updated CAP legally binding. Conclusion Once again, we applaud the City of Chula Vista for your efforts to update and strengthen the CAP. We believe this update presents an exciting opportunity for the City of Chula Vista to show leadership and bolster the resiliency of residents and infrastructure against the impacts of climate change, and fill in gaps in the City's environmental policies since the 2010 update of its CAP. In this modern era of climate action planning, cities across the region are moving aggressively toward 100% Clean Energy, CCE, significant commuter mode shift goals, and environmental justice. We hope to see Chula Vista re-emerge as a regional climate leader and strongly urge you to incorporate the recommendations enumerated above. Thank you for the opportunity to weigh in on this critically important planning document. According to the most recently available data and climate scientists, there is no greater threat to the future of humanity than climate change. Sincerely Sophie Wolfram, Policy Advocate sophie@climateactioncampaign.org (914) 715-2451 Climate Action Campaign | 4452 Park Blvd. Suite 209, San Diego, CA 92116 | 619-419-1222 info@climateactioncampaign.org | www.ClimateActionCampaign.org 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 527 City of Chula Vista’s 2017 Climate Action Plan – Energy Efficiency The programs referenced herein are representative of SDG&E’s 2017 energy efficiency portfolio, and are subject to change per California Public Utilities Commission directive. Notwithstanding any future changes, SDG&E is prepared to utilize its energy efficiency programs to help the City of Chula Vista achieve its Climate Action Plan goals. . – Energy Education & Enforcement Strategy 1. Expand education targeting key community segments and facilitate energy performance disclosure. A. Offer free evaluations through Free Resource & Energy Business Energy Evaluations (FREBE) & Home Upgrade, Carbon Downgrade programs a. FREBE can be funded through the City of Chula Vista and SDG&E’s local government partnership (LGP). B. Engage “green” business leaders through CLEAN Business program a. CLEAN Business program can be funded through the City of Chula Vista and SDG&E’s LGP. C. Initiate community‐wide social marketing campaigns to target key segments, such as DIY, disadvantaged residents and high energy users. a. SDG&E offers both the Energy Savings Assistance Program (ESA) and the CARE program to provide low-income customers with bill discounts and energy-related services and products at no cost. Further, SDG&E partners with community based organizations, such as the Energy Solutions Partner Network to coordinate activities and social media outreach. In 2016, over 3,000 activities were coordinated to promote CARE and ESA, including through socia l media (nearly 450 social media messages). D. Launch a “Build Green” awareness and assistance program for builders and permit applicants. a. The LGP budget can assist with this outreach. E. Promote the use of Green Leases to commercial property owners and tenan ts. a. SDG&E can research the feasibility of utilizing Reach Codes and Ordinance development to help implement and define a Green Lease program. F. Create local incentives or policies for building benchmarking and public disclosure. a. SDG&E provides both benchmarking support and ordinance research support. Objective 3.1 – Energy Education & Enforcement Performance Metric: Engage 8% of households and businesses on energy conservation per year 2020 MT C02e GHG Reductions: 1,936 2035 MT C02e GHG Reductions: 1,936 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 528 City of Chula Vista’s 2017 Climate Action Plan – Energy Efficiency Strategy 2. Leverage the building inspection process to deter unpermitted, low -performing energy improvements. A. Initiate monthly energy code trainings for building permit and inspection staff. a. SDG&E’s Workforce Education & Training (WE&T) program and Trade Pro Alliance at the Energy Innovation Center (EIC) can help with education and training services. B. Conduct secondary reviews of inspections to help identify common energy code errors. a. N/A C. Integrate energy and sustainability info into permit counter and/or inspection outreach materials. a. The LGP budget can be utilized to develop outreach material and educate residents and businesses about energy and sustainability information. Select trainings at the EIC are also open to the public that can provide this information to residents and businesses. D. Determine if bulk or annual permit program will encourage more permitted jobs. a. N/A E. Create “Build Green Chula Vista” network to support contractors, inspectors, appraisers and others who work with homes. a. SDG&E’s WE&T program can provide energy efficiency education to trade professionals within the network. Additionally, SDG&E will collaborate with the California Energy Commission on the adoption, implementation and enforcement of a responsible contractor policy per SB 350. F. Work with state/regional partners on consumer education of the value of permits and complaints related to energy code. a. The SEEC partnership can be leveraged to discuss best practices and share program ideas to provide Chula Vista with the information to develop the outreach material related to permitting and complaints and their benefit to the energy code. Objective 3.3 – Energy Efficiency Upgrades Performance Metric: Retrofit 13% of SF & MF homes and 10% of commercial SQFT to save 25% by 2020 (20% of both with 50% savings by 2035) 2020 MT C02e GHG Reductions: 9,428 2035 MT C02e GHG Reductions: 22,432 Strategy 1. Reauthorize the City’s “cool roof” standards and expand to include re-roofs and western areas. A. In consultation with community stakeholders (such as Realtors) offer additional Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) programs to help finance cool roof retrofits in the community. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 529 City of Chula Vista’s 2017 Climate Action Plan – Energy Efficiency a. The Residential Energy Efficiency Loan (REEL) Assistance Program, one of SDG&E’s new financing pilots, can be used to finance residential cool roofs through local credit union partners at market interest rates. B. Review related cost-effectiveness studies for the City’s two climate zones and determine if cool roof requirements are cost effective. a. The Codes and Standards group can be leveraged to provide these studies and additional reach codes can be implemented th rough these programs. Strategy 2. Facilitate more energy upgrades in the community through incentives, permit streamline (where possible), and education. A. Leverage Community Development Block Grant funding for energy upgrades for low - income households. a. SDG&E’s ESA, CARE, and Low Income Home Energy Assistance Programs (LIHEAP) programs can be leveraged to identify incentives, provide free or low-cost energy upgrades, and lower bills for income qualified customers. B. Offer expedited permitting for projects in voluntary Green Building Plus program a. N/A C. Transition to over-the-counter permitting for residential solar systems. a. N/A D. Work with SDG&E to evaluate feasibility of a permit-based energy efficiency incentive a. Through the recently filed Energy Efficiency Business Plan, SDG&E can assess the needs of the Public Sector and tailor program offerings to meet these needs. Although no program currently offers incentives for permit based energy efficiency, SDG&E will work with the City of Chula Vista to investigate the feasibility of this program. E. Evaluate if the city can allow SDG&E QA/QC program to serve as final permit inspection. a. N/A F. Seek funds to subsidize expedited Cal Green Tier 1 projects. a. Savings by Design, EEBI, and the Codes & Standards Reach Codes can be utilized to reduce the cost of installing Cal Green Tier 1 projects. Strategy 3. Require energy-savings retrofits in existing buildings at a specific point in time. A. Require free energy evaluations for businesses as part of licensing process. a. This is currently an offering provided by the FREBE program, which can be funded through the City of Chula Vista and SDG&E’s LGP. Another option is for businesses to enroll through either the Comprehensive Audit Program (CAP) to receive a free energy efficiency audit, or participate in the Business Energy Solutions (BES) program to receive audits and identify free or low-cost energy upgrades on the spot. B. Include free retrofit evaluations in Home Upgrade, Carbon Downgrade program. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 530 City of Chula Vista’s 2017 Climate Action Plan – Energy Efficiency a. This is currently an offering provided by the FREBE program, which can be funded through the City of Chula Vista and SDG&E’s LGP. C. Offer additional Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) programs to help finance energy retrofits in the community. a. In addition to PACE, Chula Vista’s residents can finance energy retrofits through the financial pilot programs, and businesses can utilize b oth these pilot programs and the On-Bill Financing program for energy efficiency projects. D. Develop Residential and Commercial Energy Conservation ordinance for City Council consideration. a. Through the LGP, SDG&E can research best practices and provide tec hnical support for energy ordinances for both residents and businesses within the community. E. Require increase energy standards on projects that receive financing form the City via Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA). a. This process can be standardized and the framework can be provided by utilizing the Reach Codes provided by SDG&E’s Codes and Standards department. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 531 Questions and Comments: • SDG&E would like to see if the City is amenable to our providing material and/or assistance in helping design the City’s EV-Ready outreach program. Please let us know your thoughts and feedback. • SDG&E would like to request further details on the Cities EV Ready program for new construction. We may be able to assist with the program. • In the City’s transition of sweet sweepers and tow trucks it is possible SDG&E can be of assistance. SDG&E’s commercial fleet team is one of the most well regarded in the industry and can provide an analysis of natural gas vehicles, engines, retrofits, and vendors available to convert gasoline or diesel vehicles to alternative fuel vehicles. It will include methods to provide public and private fueling, as well as information on new regulations for air quality, GHG reductions, fuel quality and station operations. • Can the City provide more information on the Neighborhood EV network in Otay Ranch? We may be able to assist with the program and would like to have a better understanding. Additional Services • Grant Support: o With the numerous grants available to help with electric and natural gas fleet conversion, SDG&E can share best practices for grant success and help assist with the grants. We continue to send grant opportunities to the Office of Sustainability including the recent Federal Transit Administration (FTA) availability of approximately $226.5 million of Fiscal Year 2017 funds for buses, bus facilities, and bus equipment (https://www.transit.dot.gov/busgrants). • SB 350 Priority Review Programs: o SDG&E continues to invest in infrastructure, implement grid integrated rates, leverage and provide new opportunities for competitive charging equipment and service providers, partner with institutions and entities seeking support to 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 532 deploy EV charging, ensure public safety, and protect ratepayers. As part of SB 350, SDG&E proposed seven transportation electrification projects across a diverse set of transportation sectors, including goods movement, people movement and in-home charging. o A majority of the programs will directly benefit the City of Chula Vista, specifically: ▪ Electrify local highways: SDG&E proposes to install Level 2 and DC Fast Chargers located in or near disadvantaged communities at four Caltrans Park-and-Ride locations with existing plans for new construction and upgrades. A grid integrated rate will be offered to encourage charging at times beneficial to the grid. One DCFC will be located on Palomar Street off the I-805 in Chula Vista. ▪ Medium-duty/heavy-duty and forklift port electrification: SDG&E proposes to install a combination of components such as electric vehicle supply equipment, circuits, load research meters and data loggers, in collaboration with the San Diego Unified Port District and its tenants. ▪ Green taxi/shuttle/rideshare: SDG&E proposes to provide charging infrastructure and vehicle incentives with a grid integrated rate to encourage taxi owners/companies, shuttle bus owners/companies, and rideshare drivers/companies to lease or purchase EVs. ▪ Dealership incentives: SDG&E proposes to offer EV education and incentives to dealerships and their salespeople to increase EV sales and enhance the associated customer experience. ▪ Residential charging program: SDG&E proposes to install 90,000 Level 2 charging stations at the homes of EV drivers with a grid integrated rate. o SDG&E expects a decision on the SB 350 priority review projects in October and a decision on the Residential charging program is expected in 2018. • Electric Vehicle Climate Credit: o Nearly 7,000 SDG&E customers received a $200 credit for driving a clean vehicle in 2017 – including Chula Vista residents. Customers who own or lease an all- electric or plug-in hybrid vehicle received the credit as part of the California Air Resources Board’s effort to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in California. o In total, SDG&E distributed over $1.4M through the Electric Vehicle Climate Credit program. The program is closed for 2017 and will reopen again early next year. o If you applied for the credit in 2017 and you’re still driving an electric vehicle in 2018, you’re eligible to apply again. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 533 City of Chula Vista Staff Report File#:17-0347, Item#: 15. CONSIDERATION OF AMENDING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET; AMENDING THE INFRASTRUCTURE, FACILITIES, AND EQUIPMENT EXPENDITURE PLAN; AND MAKING VARIOUS AMENDMENTS TO THE OPERATING AND CIP PROGRAM BUDGETS RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING THE FY 2017- 18 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET BY ESTABLISHING NEW CIP PROJECTS, “CITYWIDE NETWORK REPLACEMENT (MEASURE P)” (GG236) AND “CITYWIDE TELECOMMUNICATIONS (MEASURE P)” (GG237); AMENDING THE INFRASTRUCTURE, FACILITIES, AND EQUIPMENT EXPENDITURE PLAN TO INCLUDE SAID PROJECTS; AND MAKING VARIOUS AMENDMENTS TO THE FY 2017-18 OPERATING AND CIP PROGRAM BUDGETS TO APPROPRIATE FUNDS FOR ELIGIBLE MEASURE P SALES TAX EXPENSES (4/5 VOTE REQUIRED) RECOMMENDED ACTION Council adopt the resolution. SUMMARY On November 8, 2016, Chula Vista voters approved Measure P, authorizing a one-half cent sales tax increase on retail sales within the City for a period of ten (10) years to repair failed or failing assets thorough out the city. On June 6, 2017, by Resolution 2017-089, City Council approved the issuance of Bonds by the Chula Vista Municipal Financing Authority (Authority) to fund approximately $71,000,000 in Measure P projects. This amount exceeds the adopted budget approved for the FY 2017-18 Operating and Capital Improvement Programs. Staff requests (1) creating new capital improvement projects “Citywide Network Replacement (Measure P)” (GG237) and Citywide Telecommunications (Measure P)” (GG237), (2) amending the Infrastructure, Facilities, and Equipment Expenditure Plan to include said projects, and (3) amending the FY 2017-18 Operating and Capital Improvement Program budgets to add the additional Bond proceeds to the amended Infrastructure, Facilities and Equipment Expenditure Plan, accelerating the repair of critical assets. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Development Services Director has reviewed the proposed activity for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines because it City of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 1 of 5 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 534 File#:17-0347, Item#: 15. defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines because it will not result in a physical change to the environment; therefore, pursuant to Section 15060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines the actions proposed are not subject to CEQA. Environmental Notice The activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required. BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION At the Citizens’ Oversight Committee (COC) meeting held on July 27, 2017, City staff presented the amended Infrastructure, Facilities and Equipment Expenditure Plan which reflected year-to-date allocations and highlighted the Information Technology programs. This plan included the proposed allocation of the additional $18.7 million of bond proceeds that had not been included in Measure P projects in the FY 2017-18 Adopted City Budget. The COC provided input and provided consent on the amended plan and proposed allocations and recommended it be taken to the City Council for approval. DISCUSSION The City Council adopted an Infrastructure, Facilities and Equipment Expenditure Plan (Plan) on December 6, 2016, relating to the expenditure of the Measure P Sales Tax. The amended Plan (see Attachments A and B) adds the Citywide Network Replacement and Telecommunications projects separately to improve monitoring and accountability. On June 6, 2017, City Council approved the issuance of Bonds to fund approximately $71,000,000 in Measure P projects. This amount represents an increase of $18,685,973 from the original amount approved in the FY 2017-18 Adopted Operating and Capital Improvement Program Budgets. At this time, staff is requesting that the increased funding be appropriated, as summarized in the table below, to projects that were included in the FY 2017-18 CIP budget or derived from the amended Plan. City of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 2 of 5 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 535 File#:17-0347, Item#: 15. Many of the projects are currently in the early design stages. Attachment C provides a summarized list of current and future projects based upon the amended expenditure plan as well as targeted completion dates. Additionally, the proposed allocation will allow accelerating delivery of projects that include efficiencies to reduce future utility costs (energy, water, etc.) in the project scope. The utility efficiency scope is generally lighting, irrigation and Heating Ventilation & Air Conditioning (HVAC) related and is included in the projects associated with police facility repairs, sports courts and fields, park infrastructure, recreation and senior centers, libraries, and other public buildings repairs. The projects and work associated with these budget adjustments is generally summarized as follows: Various City Building Facilities. Complete a general renovation of identified facility assets including: roof replacements or repairs, plumbing repairs or replacements, bathroom upgrades and/or renovations, repair or replace HVAC systems, flooring repairs or replacements, repainting or resurfacing (interior and exterior), and make electrical repairs and lighting efficiencies. All work will strive to meet water and energy efficiency goals and repair critical assets. Sports Courts & Fields. Improve field conditions and upgrade the irrigation systems to a smart system allowing for efficient and effective water use. Field work includes: renovating, re-seeding, aerating, fertilizing, and in some cases replacing sod. In addition to the fields, many of the sports courts (tennis, basketball, etc.) throughout parks are in need of a variety of repairs. All work will strive to meet water and energy efficiency goals and repair critical assets. Park Infrastructure. Repair or replace park assets that have failed or reached the end of their life cycle including: smart irrigation systems, play structures, playground surfacing, barbeque grills, tables, benches, trash receptacles, drinking fountains, lighting, signage, and gazebos. All work will strive to meet water and energy efficiency goals and repair critical assets. City of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 3 of 5 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 536 File#:17-0347, Item#: 15. Street Pavement & Sidewalk. Based on recommendations from the City's Pavement Management System, residential streets that are in the worst condition will be repaired and repaved. Failed residential streets with a Pavement Condition Index (PCI) rating from 0 to 25 have been identified for repair. Additionally, damaged sidewalk throughout the city will be repaired based on prioritization recommendations provided by the Pedestrian Connectivity Plan currently under development. Drainage. Complete rehabilitation, replacement, or lining of failed and damaged city-owned Corrugated Metal Pipe (CMP) that is located beyond the public roadway right-of-way. Citywide Network. The overall computer network which provides all the connectivity between PC’s, servers, phones and other network attached devices throughout the City is obsolete, no longer supported by the manufacture and vulnerable to security breaches. A Baseline Assessment Report of the network was completed by NCI Partners in April 2017 and found that the majority of the network equipment was no longer available for sale and 20% was beyond the “end of support” date and surmised that this was a “dangerous state to be in”. Replacement of the network equipment will restore the security of the system as well as increasing the efficiency in operations and providing the capability to deploy emerging “Smart City” technologies/solutions to benefit the community. A redundant communications network will also provide a more reliable backbone in the event of breakage, damage or outages. The Citywide network supports projects that reduce traffic congestion on streets, reduce associated carbon emissions, enable enhanced energy savings in City buildings, provide advanced citizen engagement through data sharing and capabilities of virtual City Hall, and enable enhanced security at City parks and other locations. Citywide Telecommunications. The citywide telecommunications system is nearly 20 years old and replacement components are no longer manufactured. Refurbished parts are becoming increasingly difficult to secure. The system is analogue based and has significant limitations in functionality compared to current systems that utilize computer networks (voice over internet protocol (VOIP)). VOIP systems allow for video conferencing, computer screen sharing, call following (“desk phone” can be accessed regardless of location), and other features which increase productivity and responsiveness for employees to the public. DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT Staff has reviewed the property holdings of the City Council of the City of Chula Vista members and has found no property holdings within 500 feet of the boundaries of the property which is the subject of this action. Consequently, this item does not present a disqualifying real property-related financial conflict of interest under California Code of Regulations Title 2, section 18702.2(a)(11), for purposes of the Political Reform Act (Cal. Gov’t Code §87100,et seq.). Staff is not independently aware, and has not been informed by any City of Chula Vista City Council member, of any other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter. LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS The City’s Strategic Plan has five major goals: Operational Excellence, Economic Vitality, HealthyCity of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 4 of 5 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 537 File#:17-0347, Item#: 15. The City’s Strategic Plan has five major goals: Operational Excellence, Economic Vitality, Healthy Community, Strong and Secure Neighborhoods and a Connected Community. This action supports the Operational Excellence goal by communicating the City’s projected financial position for the current fiscal year in an open and transparent manner. This transparency supports City Initiative 1.3.1. - “Foster public trust through an open and ethical government.” CURRENT YEAR FISCAL IMPACT By Resolution 2017-089, City Council approved the issuance of Bonds to fund approximately $71,000,000 in Measure P projects. Approval of the resolution will (1) create new capital improvement projects “Citywide Network Replacement (Measure P)” (GG237) and Citywide Telecommunications (Measure P)” (GG237), (2) amend the Infrastructure, Facilities, and Equipment Expenditure Plan to include said projects, and (3) amend the FY 2017-18 Operating and Capital Improvement Program budgets to add the additional Bond proceeds to the amended Infrastructure, Facilities and Equipment Expenditure Plan, accelerating the repair of critical assets. ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT The Expenditure Plan anticipates that the one-half cent sales tax increase would generate between $16.6 million in FY 2018-19 and $14.6 million in three (3) quarters of the final FY 2026-27. As part of the City’s annual budget process, annual allocations to the Measure P Sales Tax Fund would be brought forward for City Council consideration and action. Prior to City Council consideration of the City’s annual budget, staff will prepare and present to the Citizens’ Oversight Committee for its review a spending plan for Measure P revenues. ATTACHMENTS Attachment A - Proposed Amended Measure P Spending Plan Attachment B - Infrastructure, Facilities and Equipment Plan (10-Year Period) Attachment C - Project Status Updates Staff Contact: Bob Beamon, Engineering & Capital Projects City of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 5 of 5 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 538 RESOLUTION NO. __________ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING THE FY 2017-18 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET BY ESTABLISHING NEW CIP PROJECTS, “CITYWIDE NETWORK REPLACEMENT (MEASURE P)” (GG236) AND “CITYWIDE TELECOMMUNICATIONS (MEASURE P)” (GG237); AMENDING THE INFRASTRUCTURE, FACILITIES, AND EQUIPMENT EXPENDITURE PLAN TO INCLUDE SAID PROJECTS; AND MAKING VARIOUS AMENDMENTS TO THE FY 2017-18 OPERATING AND CIP PROGRAM BUDGETS APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR ELIGIBLE MEASURE P SALES TAX EXPENSES WHEREAS, on November 8, 2016 the People of the City of Chula Vista approved Measure P authorizing a one-half cent sales tax on retail sales within the City for a period of ten (10) years; and WHEREAS, the spending plan, The City Council Infrastructure, Facilities and Equipment Expenditure Plan (“Expenditure Plan”) has been updated to reflect, where necessary, the ratification of Measure P; and WHEREAS, per the Ordinance, Section 3.33.160.A all revenue generated by the tax shall be accounted for in the General Fund as a separate line item and will then be transferred to a General Fund subfund entitled “Measure ‘X’ Sales Tax Fund”; and WHEREAS, as required in the Ordinance, Section 3.33.160.A staff has created the 2016 Measure P Sales Tax Fund (Fund 201) for the purpose of accounting for all revenues and expenditures of Measure P monies; and WHEREAS, on June 6, 2017, by Resolution 2017-089, City Council approved the issuance of Bonds by the Chula Vista Municipal Financing Authority (“Authority”) to fund approximately $71,000,000 in Measure P projects; and WHEREAS, the recommended additions to the Infrastructure, Facilities and Equipment Expenditure Plan include the Citywide Network Replacement (GG236) and Citywide Telecommunications (GG237) projects; and WHEREAS, the recommended fiscal year 2017/18 Operating and CIP Program budget amendments are all eligible items approved as part of the Expenditure Plan; and WHEREAS,the recommended adjustments to the General Fund and the 2016 Measure P Sales Tax Fund consist of offsetting revenues and expenditures which result in no net impact to these funds. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 539 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, that it does hereby (1) establishes new capital improvement projects “Citywide Network Replacement (Measure P)” (GG237); Citywide Telecommunications (Measure P)” (GG237), and (2) amends the Infrastructure, Facilities, and Equipment Expenditure Plan to include said projects, and (3) amends the fiscal year 2017/18 operating and capital improvement program budgets for the following appropriations: Summary of Operating Budget Amendments Summary of CIP Program Budget Amendments Presented by Approved as to form by William S. Valle Glen R. Googins Director of Engineering & Capital Projects/ City Attorney City Engineer DEPARTMENT/FUND SUPPLIES & SERVICES TRANSFERS OUT CIP TOTAL EXPENSE TOTAL REVENUE NET COST Non-Departmental -$ 18,685,973$ -$ 18,685,973$ 18,685,973$ -$ Measure P Sales Tax Fund 185,000$ -$ 18,500,973$ 18,685,973$ 18,685,973$ -$ TOTAL 185,000$ 18,685,973$ 18,500,973$ 37,371,946$ 37,371,946$ -$ PROJECT PROJECT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT GG232 Police Facility Repairs (Measure P)500,000$ GG233 Recreation & Senior Centers Repairs (Measure P)2,000,000$ GG231 Civic Center and South Libraries (Measure P)1,500,000$ GG234 Public Building Repairs (Measure P)2,000,000$ PR327 Sports Courts and Fields (Measure P)1,500,000$ PR326 Park Infrastructure (Measure P)3,500,000$ STL427 Street Pavement Rehab (Measure P)1,955,973$ STL428 Sidewalk Replacement (Measure P)1,500,000$ DR209 CMP Rehab Outside ROW (Measure P)(90,000)$ DR210 Drainage Pipe Assessment Outside ROW (Measure P)90,000$ GG236 Citywide Network Replacement (Measure P)2,045,000$ GG237 Citywide Telecommunications (Measure P)2,000,000$ TOTAL 2016 MEASURE P SALES TAX FUND 18,500,973$ 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 540 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 541 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 542 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 543 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 544 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 545 City of Chula Vista Staff Report File#:17-0379, Item#: 16. A. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING THE COMPENSATION SCHEDULE AND CLASSIFICATION PLAN TO REFLECT THE ADDITION OF VARIOUS POSITION TITLES AND AMENDING THE AUTHORIZED POSITION COUNT IN VARIOUS DEPARTMENTS WITH A NET DECREASE IN AUTHORIZED STAFFING B. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE AMENDED COMPENSATION SUMMARY FOR UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEES C. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE REVISED FISCAL YEAR 2017-2018 COMPENSATION SCHEDULE EFFECTIVE SEPTEMBER 15, 2017, AS REQUIRED BY CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, TITLE 2, SECTION 570.5 TO REFLECT ADDITION OF BUILDING SERVICES SUPERVISOR AND PRINCIPAL TRAFFIC ENGINEER POSITION TITLES RECOMMENDED ACTION Council adopt the resolutions. SUMMARY In an effort to address the needs of various departments and the City's workforce, the Human Resources Department, in conjunction with the affected departments, is proposing the reclassification of certain positions and the addition of two new classifications. Additionally, staff is bringing forth an amendment to the Compensation Summary for Unrepresented Employees which reflects a reduction in the maximum taxable Cash Payment Option allowed for Executive and Senior Managers. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Environmental Notice The activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required. City of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 1 of 4 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 546 File#:17-0379, Item#: 16. Environmental Determination The Director of Development Services has reviewed the proposed activity for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to Section 15060(c) (3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Thus, no environmental review is required. BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Civil Service Commission adopted the amendment to the classification plan, subject to the approval of the City Council, at their September 7, 2017 meeting. DISCUSSION 1.Amendment to Compensation Schedule and Classification Plan Civil Service Rule 1.02(A), which applies to the City’s classified positions, provides for necessary reviews and changes so that the City’s classification plan is kept current, and that changes in existing classes, the establishment of new classes or the abolition of classes are properly reflected in the classification plan. In an effort to address the needs of various departments and the City's workforce, the Human Resources Department is proposing various new classifications and the reclassification of certain positions. The following identifies the departments, affected positions and proposed changes. Summary of Updated Classifications City of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 2 of 4 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 547 File#:17-0379, Item#: 16. 2.Amendment to Compensation Summary for Unrepresented Employees Benefited employees, with exception of employees represented by the Chula Vista Police Officers’ Association and International Association of Fire Fighters, are provided an annual allotment to use toward the purchase of benefits available under the City’s Cafeteria Benefits Plan (Flex Plan). Any Flex Plan allotment remaining after electing medical, dental, vision and/or Flexible Spending Account coverage may be allotted to a taxable Cash Payment Option. Staff is recommending amending the Compensation Summary for Unrepresented Employees to reflect a reduction in the maximum taxable Cash Payment Option for Elected Officials, Executive and Senior Managers to help address the City’s 10-year financial forecast. Elected Officials and Executive Managers maximum cash payment option will be reduced to the following: ·$12,000 for Calendar Year 2018 ·$10,000 for Calendar Year 2019 ·$8,000 for Calendar Year 2020 Senior Managers maximum cash payment option will be reduced to the following: ·$11,000 for Calendar Year 2018 ·$9,000 for Calendar Year 2019 ·$7,000 for Calendar Year 2020 Approval of Resolution B will approve an Amendment to the Compensation Summary for Unrepresented Employees to reflect the above change. 3.Revised Fiscal Year 2017-2018 Compensation Summary California Code of Regulations, Title 2, Section 570.5 requires that, for purposes of determining a retiring employee's pension allowance, the pay rate be limited to the amount listed on a pay schedule that meets certain requirements and be approved by the governing body in accordance with the requirements of the applicable public meeting laws. The revised Fiscal Year 2017-2018 Compensation Schedule ("Compensation Schedule") was last approved by the City Council at their meeting of July 11, 2017. Approval of Resolution C will approve the revised Compensation Schedule effective September 15, 2017, to reflect the addition of the Building Services Supervisor and Principal Traffic Engineer position titles. City of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 3 of 4 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 548 File#:17-0379, Item#: 16. DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT Staff has determined that the action contemplated by this item is ministerial, secretarial, manual, or clerical in nature and, as such, does not require the City Council members to make or participate in making a governmental decision, pursuant to California Code of Regulations Title 2, section 18702.4 (a). Consequently, this item does not present a conflict under the Political Reform Act (Cal. Gov't Code § 87100, et seq.). Staff is not independently aware, and has not been informed by any City Council member, of any other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter. LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS The City’s Strategic Plan has five major goals: Operational Excellence, Economic Vitality, Healthy Community, Strong and Secure Neighborhoods and a Connected Community. The position changes support the City-wide strategic goal of Operational Excellence by providing more accurate position titles that better reflect the needs of the City’s workforce and salaries that attract and retain quality employees. Furthermore, approval of the revised Fiscal Year 2017-2018 Compensation Schedule and its posting on the City's internet website supports the goal of Operational Excellence as it enhances disclosure and transparency of employee compensation and, as a result, fosters public trust through an open and ethical government. CURRENT YEAR FISCAL IMPACT The proposed position/classification changes do not have a net impact on the General Fund in the current fiscal year. Although the position adjustments in the Animal Care Facility and Recreation Departments cause some personnel services savings, both departments are requesting that this savings be transferred to hourly personnel. This results in a no net impact to these department budgets. The FTE change within the Engineering Department has no net impact to the General Fund as the FTE change does not require any salary adjustments. The position adjustments within the Public Works Department are estimated to total a net cost of $6,333. There is anticipated salary savings projected in the department to absorb the additional cost, resulting in no net impact to the General Fund. ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT The ongoing costs associated with these proposed changes will be incorporated into the baseline salary budgets of the respective departments in future fiscal years. ATTACHMENT 1. Amended Compensation Summary for Unrepresented Employees 2. Revised Fiscal Year 2017-2018 Compensation Schedule Effective September 15, 2017 Staff Contact: Courtney Chase City of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 4 of 4 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 549 Page 1 of 34 COMPENSATION SUMMARY FOR EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT, SENIOR MANAGEMENT, UNCLASSIFIED MIDDLE MANAGEMENT/PROFESSIONAL, CONFIDENTIAL MIDDLE MANAGEMENT/PROFESSIONAL, UNCLASSIFIED CONFIDENTIAL, CONFIDENTIAL CLASSIFIED, MAYOR, COUNCIL, CITY ATTORNEY AND UNCLASSIFIED HOURLY EMPLOYEES FISCAL YEARS 2017-2018, 2018-2019 and 2019-2020 I. EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT GROUP (ALL EMPLOYEES PROVIDED FOR IN THIS GROUP ARE FLSA-EXEMPT) A. SALARY & WAGES 1. Salary Increases a. For Fiscal Year 2017-2018 all Executive positions shall receive a 2% salary adjustment the first full pay period of July 2017. b. For Fiscal Year 2018-2019 all Executive positions shall receive a 2% salary adjustment the first full pay period of July 2018. c. For Fiscal Year 2019-2020 all Executive positions shall receive a 2% salary adjustment the first full pay period of July 2019. B. BENEFITS 1. Deferred Compensation Plan 457 plan - Employees in the Executive Group may participate in the City's approved deferred compensation plans. 2. Cafeteria Plan a. In calendar year 2017, Executive Managers will receive $16,536 annually to be used for the purchase of approved employee benefits through the City’s cafeteria plan or to be placed in a taxable cash option. a) For calendar year 2017 the maximum taxable option shall be $15,162 b) For calendar year 2018 the maximum taxable option shall be $12,000 c) For calendar year 2019 the maximum taxable option shall be $10,000 d) For calendar year 2020 the maximum taxable option shall be $8,000 b. In the event of increases in health care plan premiums, the City will split the cost of the increase 50/50 with the employees. The annual cafeteria plan benefit allotment will be increased by one-half of the average cost increase for full family non-indemnity health plan premiums. The City's share of the increased cost will be added to the beginning cafeteria plan balance of the next available cafeteria plan year. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 550 Page 2 of 34 c. From the annual Cafeteria Plan allotment, each employee must elect medical coverage under one of the City sponsored plans, unless the employee has group medical insurance from another source including coverage under their City employee spouse’s plan in which case they may waive coverage so long as the alternative plan is deemed to be an acceptable plan by the City. When waiving coverage the full value of the Cafeteria Plan allotment will be available to purchase any of the other options available under the Cafeteria Plan. Waiver of coverage is irrevocable during a plan year unless the City is notified within 30 days that the employee has involuntarily lost the alternative coverage. d. The Flex Benefit Amount for Employee Only, those with coverage outside of the City, and those employees covered by another City Employee is fixed at the amount provided in the calendar year 2013 ($15,162). The flex amount for Employee+1 and Employee+Family will be adjusted under the current 50/50 cost sharing formula. 3. Short/Long Term Disability Insurance The City will pay the full cost of the short/long-term disability insurance premium for Executive Managers. 4. Retiree Healthcare The City will no longer provide for subsidized retiree health care rates by offering a blended healthcare rate for employees hired after January 1, 2011. 5. Life Insurance City pays for a Group Term Life and AD&D insurance policy with coverage in the amount of $50,000 per employee. 6. Retirement The City will provide to unrepresented members retirement benefits via contract with the California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) as set forth in the California Government Code. The City will provide the following defined benefit formulas: Tier 1 Local Miscellaneous 3% @ 60 Local Safety 3% @ 50 Tier 2* Local Miscellaneous 2% @ 60 Local Safety 3% @ 55 Tier 3** Local Miscellaneous 2% @ 62 Local Safety 2.7% @ 57 * Effective 04/22/2011 ** Effective 01/01/2013 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 551 Page 3 of 34 Tier 1: Local Miscellaneous 3% @ 60 and Local Safety 3% @ 50 Pension Contributions: PEPRA provides that equal sharing of normal costs shall be the standard. To reach that standard, Tier 1 Employees will continue to make the required employee contribution (with no EPMC) of 8% for Local Miscellaneous and 9% for local Safety, but will also contribute the below amounts (in a phased in manner) to the employer’s side (pursuant to Government Code (GC) section 20516) to reach the CalPERS standard of equal sharing of normal costs. Accordingly, Tier 1 Employees shall make the following pension contributions. Local Miscellaneous unrepresented employees in Tier 1 shall contribute 8%, which will be applied to the employee’s contribution to CalPERS. There shall be no EPMC. In addition, Local Miscellaneous unrepresented employees in Tier 1 shall also contribute the amounts stated below on the employer’s side (GC 20516) until equal sharing of normal costs is reached: • Up to 1% in the first full pay period of July 2017 on the employer’s (for a total contribution of 9% (8% employee side and 1% employer side)), not to exceed 50% of normal cost as determined by City’s Actuary • Up to an additional 1% on the employer’s side in the first full pay period of July 2018 (for a total of 10% (8% employee side and up to 2% employer side)), not to exceed 50% of normal cost as determined by City’s Actuary • First full pay period of July 2019, 50% of normal cost as determined by City’s Actuary (including 8% on employee side plus additional amount paid to employer’s side) Local Safety unrepresented employees in Tier 1 shall contribute 9%, which will be applied to the employee’s contribution to CalPERS. There shall be no EPMC. In addition, Local Safety unrepresented employees in Tier 1 shall also contribute the amounts stated below on the employer’s side (GC 20516) until equal sharing of normal costs is reached: • Up to 1% in the first full pay period of July 2017 on the employer’s (for a total contribution of 10% (9% employee side and 1% employer side)), not to exceed 50% of normal cost as determined by City’s Actuary • Up to an additional 1% on the employer’s side in the first full pay period of July 2018 (for a total of 11% (9% employee side and up to 2% employer side)), not to exceed 50% of normal cost as determined by City’s Actuary • Up to an additional 1% on the employer’s side in the first full pay period of July 2018 (for a total of 12% (% employee side and up to 3% employer side)), not to exceed 50% of normal cost as determined by City’s Actuary The following is a summary of Tier 1 CalPERS contract provisions: A. One-Year Final Compensation B. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance C. Credit for Unused Sick Leave D. 4th Level 1959 Survivor Benefit. E. Military Service Credit as Prior Service 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 552 Page 4 of 34 F. Cost of Living Allowance (2%) G. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance Continuance H. Pre-Retirement Death Benefit for Spouse I. Retired Death Benefit $5,000 J. Prior Service Credit The contributions on the employer’s side (GC 20516) described above are “up to” amounts per fiscal year meaning the employee may be required to contribute up the full amount listed, but the amounts may be less. For example, in FY 2017- 18, the amount for Tier 1 is expected to be the full 1% of GC 20516 contribution, but for Tier 2 (miscellaneous) the amount is expected to be a 0.2% GC 20516 contribution. In addition, the contribution amounts will be based on the City Actuary’s review of most recent CalPERS Annual Valuation Report. For FY 17/18 the most recent Annual Valuation Report was as of June 30, 2015. Tier 2: Local Miscellaneous 2% @ 60 and Local Safety 3% @ 55 Pension Contributions: PEPRA provides that equal sharing of normal costs shall be the standard. To meet that standard, Employees will continue to make the required employee contribution (with no EPMC) of 7% for Local Miscellaneous and 9% for local Safety, but will also contribute (in a phased in manner) to the employer’s side (Government Code (GC) section 20516) to reach the CalPERS standard of equal sharing of normal costs. Accordingly, Tier 2 employees shall make the following pension contributions. Local Miscellaneous unrepresented employees in Tier 2 shall contribute 7%, which will be applied to the employee contribution to CalPERS. There shall be no EPMC. In addition, Local Miscellaneous unrepresented employees in Tier 2 shall also contribute the amounts stated below on the employer’s side (GC 20516) until equal sharing of normal costs is reached: • Up to 1% in the first full pay period of July 2017 on the employer’s (for a total contribution of 8% (7% employee side and 1% employer side)), not to exceed 50% of normal cost as determined by City’s Actuary • Up to an additional 1% on the employer’s side in the first full pay period of July 2018 (for a total of 9% (7% employee side and up to 2% employer side)), not to exceed 50% of normal cost as determined by City’s Actuary • First full pay period of July 2019, 50% of normal cost as determined by City’s Actuary (including 7% on employee side plus additional amount paid to employer’s side) Local Safety unrepresented employees in Tier 2 shall contribute 9%, which will be applied to the employee’s contribution to CalPERS. There shall be no EPMC. In addition, Local Safety unrepresented employees in Tier 2 shall also contribute the amounts stated below on the employer’s side (GC 20516) until equal sharing of normal costs is reached: • Up to 1% in the first full pay period of July 2017 on the employer’s (for a total contribution of 10% (9% employee side and 1% employer side)), not to exceed 50% of normal cost as determined by City’s Actuary 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 553 Page 5 of 34 • Up to an additional 1% on the employer’s side in the first full pay period of July 2018 (for a total of 11% (9% employee side and up to 2% employer side)), not to exceed 50% of normal cost as determined by City’s Actuary • Up to an additional 1% on the employer’s side in the first full pay period of July 2018 (for a total of 12% (9% employee side and up to 3% employer side)), not to exceed 50% of normal cost as determined by City’s Actuary The following is a summary of Tier 2 CalPERS contract provisions: A. Three-Year Final Compensation B. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance C. Credit for Unused Sick Leave D. 4th Level 1959 Survivor Benefit. E. Military Service Credit as Prior Service F. Cost of Living Allowance (2%) G. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance Continuance H. Pre-Retirement Death Benefit for Spouse I. Retired Death Benefit $5,000 J. Prior Service Credit The contributions on the employer’s side (GC 20516) described above are “up to” amounts per fiscal year meaning the employee may be required to contribute up the full amount listed, but the amounts may be less. For example, in FY 2017- 18, the amount for Tier 1 is expected to be the full 1% of GC 20516 contribution, but for Tier 2 (local miscellaneous) the amount is expected to be a 0.2% GC 20516 contribution. In addition, the contribution amounts will be based on the City Actuary’s review of most recent CalPERS Annual Valuation Report. For FY 17/18 the most recent Annual Valuation Report was as of June 30, 2015. Tier 3: Local Miscellaneous 2% @ 62 and Local Safety 2.7% @ 57 Local Miscellaneous and Local Safety unrepresented employees in Tier 3 shall be responsible for the full employee contribution which will be applied to the CalPERS employee contribution. There shall be no EPMC. PEPRA provides that equal sharing of the normal costs shall be the standard. To meet this standard, Tier 3 employees shall also make additional contributions on the employer’s side (GC 20516) (in up to 1% percent increments per fiscal year, as determined by the City’s actuary) to attain the equal cost sharing of normal costs standard. As of the approval of this Compensation Summary by City Council, no such contributions are expected the 2017-2018 Fiscal Year. To the extent permitted by Assembly Bill 340, known as the California Public Employees’ Pension Reform Act of 2013, the following is a summary of Tier 3 benefits: A. Three-Year Final Compensation B. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance C. Credit for Unused Sick Leave 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 554 Page 6 of 34 D. 4th Level 1959 Survivor Benefit. The monthly member cost for this benefit will be paid by the City. E. Military Service Credit as Prior Service F. Cost of Living Allowance (2%) G. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance Continuance H. Pre-Retirement Death Benefit for Spouse I. Retired Death Benefit $5,000 J. Prior Service Credit 7. Termination of Sick Leave Balances Upon either acceptance of an application by a Safety employee for disability retirement, or upon the independent determination of CalPERS that a non-safety employee is disabled, the employee shall not be entitled to use any remaining sick leave to cover absences beyond their FMLA entitlement. Sick leave balances may be applied to applicable CalPERS service credit. An application for industrial disability retirement, either employee or employer initiated, shall not affect the employee's rights’ under Workers Compensation laws, such as any otherwise existing right to Temporary Disability benefits for safety officers. 8. Sick Leave Sick leave shall accrue and be reimbursed as designated in the Civil Service Rules. 9. Annual Leave a. Executive Managers shall earn five weeks (25 days) annual leave per fiscal year accrued at 7.69 hours per pay period. An employee may not accumulate more than three times the number of annual leave days accrued annually. b. Executive Managers will have the option of selling back three (3) weeks accrued annual leave each fiscal year. 10. Holidays a. Executive Managers will be credited 24 hours each fiscal year for floating holidays (Lincoln's and Washington's Birthdays, and Admission Day). b. The City will be closed on the following hard holidays: Independence Day, Labor Day, Veterans Day, Thanksgiving, the day after Thanksgiving, Christmas, New Year's Day, Martin Luther King Jr.'s Birthday, Cesar Chavez Day, Memorial Day. 11. Administrative Leave Executive Managers will receive ninety-six (96) hours of Administrative Leave each fiscal year. 12. Mileage Reimbursement Employees in this unit shall be subject to a mileage reimbursement program when required to use their private automobile for authorized City business. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 555 Page 7 of 34 Reimbursement rate will be tied to the IRS rate, in effect at the time reimbursement is requested, as permitted by law. 13. Severance Pay In the event an Executive Manager is terminated without cause, he or she shall receive compensation in a lump sum cash payment equal to nine (9) months of his or her annual salary and health insurance payments. The aforementioned severance pay shall not be reduced during the term of their employment. Notwithstanding the aforementioned severance terms, if an Executive Manager has an employment contract their severance payment shall be as set forth in their employment contract/offer letter. 14. Special Assignment Pay Executive Managers may receive up to 10% additional compensation when assigned by the City Manager to a special project. 15. Educational and Uniform Allowances The Chief of Police and Fire Chief will be provided with the uniform allowance and educational differentials as specified in the POA and IAFF MOUs respectively. (Remainder of page intentionally left blank.) 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 556 Page 8 of 34 II. SENIOR MANAGEMENT GROUP (ALL EMPLOYEES PROVIDED FOR IN THIS GROUP ARE FLSA-EXEMPT) A. SALARY & WAGES 1. Salary Increases a. For Fiscal Year 2017-2018 all Senior Management positions shall receive a 2% salary adjustment the first full pay period of July 2017. b. For Fiscal Year 2018-2019 all Senior Management positions shall receive a 2% salary adjustment the first full pay period of July 2018. c. For Fiscal Year 2019-2020 all Senior Management positions shall receive a 2% salary adjustment the first full pay period of July 2019. B. BENEFITS 1. Deferred Compensation Plan 457 Plan - Employees in the Senior Management Group may participate in the City's approved deferred compensation plans. 2. Cafeteria Plan a. In calendar year 2017, Senior Managers will receive $15,136 annually to be used for the purchase of approved employee benefits or to be placed in a taxable cash option. 1. For calendar year 2017 the maximum taxable option shall be $13,726 2. For calendar year 2018 the maximum taxable option shall be $11,000 3. For calendar year 2019 the maximum taxable option shall be $9,000 4. For calendar year 2020 the maximum taxable option shall be $7,000 b. In the event of increases in health care plan premiums, the City will split the cost of the increase 50/50 with the employees. The annual cafeteria plan allotment will be increased by one-half of the average cost increase for full family non-indemnity health plan premiums. The City's share of the increased cost will be added to the beginning cafeteria plan balance of the next available cafeteria plan year. c. From the annual Cafeteria Plan allotment, each employee must elect medical coverage under one of the City sponsored plans, unless the employee has group medical insurance from another source including coverage under their City employee spouse’s plan in which case they may waive coverage so long as the alternative plan is deemed to be an acceptable plan by the City. When waiving coverage the full value of the Cafeteria Plan allotment will be available to purchase any of the other options available under the Cafeteria Plan. Waiver of coverage is irrevocable during a plan year unless the City is notified within 30 days that the employee has involuntarily lost the alternative coverage. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 557 Page 9 of 34 d. The Flex Benefit Amount for Employee Only, those with coverage outside of the City, and those employees covered by another City Employee is fixed at the amount provided in the calendar year 2013 ($13,762). The flex amount for Employee+1 and Employee+Family will be adjusted under the current 50/50 cost sharing formula. 3. Short/Long Term Disability Insurance The City will pay the full cost of the short/long-term disability insurance premium for Senior Managers. 4. Retiree Healthcare The City will no longer provide for subsidized retiree health care rates by offering a blended healthcare rate for employees hired after January 1, 2011. 5. Life Insurance City pays for a Group Term Life and AD&A insurance policy with coverage in the amount of $50,000 per employee. 6. Retirement The City will provide to unrepresented members retirement benefits via contract with the California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) as set forth in the California Government Code. The City will provide the following defined benefit formulas: Tier 1 Local Miscellaneous 3% @ 60 Local Safety 3% @ 50 Tier 2* Local Miscellaneous 2% @ 60 Local Safety 3% @ 55 Tier 3** Local Miscellaneous 2% @ 62 Local Safety 2.7% @ 57 * Effective 04/22/2011 **Effective 01/01/2013 Tier 1: Local Miscellaneous 3% @ 60 and Local Safety 3% @ 50 Pension Contributions: PEPRA provides that equal sharing of normal costs shall be the standard. To reach that standard, Tier 1 Employees will continue to make the required employee contribution (with no EPMC) of 8% for Local Miscellaneous and 9% for local Safety, but will also contribute the below amounts (in a phased in manner) to the employer’s side (pursuant to Government Code (GC) section 20516) to reach the CalPERS standard of equal sharing of normal costs. Accordingly, Tier 1 Employees shall make the following pension contributions. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 558 Page 10 of 34 Local Miscellaneous unrepresented employees in Tier 1 shall contribute 8%, which will be applied to the employee’s contribution to CalPERS. There shall be no EPMC. In addition, Local Miscellaneous unrepresented employees in Tier 1 shall also contribute the amounts stated below on the employer’s side (GC 20516) until equal sharing of normal costs is reached: • Up to 1% in the first full pay period of July 2017 on the employer’s (for a total contribution of 9% (8% employee side and 1% employer side)), not to exceed 50% of normal cost as determined by City’s Actuary • Up to an additional 1% on the employer’s side in the first full pay period of July 2018 (for a total of 10% (8% employee side and up to 2% employer side)), not to exceed 50% of normal cost as determined by City’s Actuary • First full pay period of July 2019, 50% of normal cost as determined by City’s Actuary (including 8% on employee side plus additional amount paid to employer’s side) Local Safety unrepresented employees in Tier 1 shall contribute 9%, which will be applied to the employee’s contribution to CalPERS. There shall be no EPMC. In addition, Local Safety unrepresented employees in Tier 1 shall also contribute the amounts stated below on the employer’s side (GC 20516) until equal sharing of normal costs is reached: • Up to 1% in the first full pay period of July 2017 on the employer’s (for a total contribution of 10% (9% employee side and 1% employer side)), not to exceed 50% of normal cost as determined by City’s Actuary • Up to an additional 1% on the employer’s side in the first full pay period of July 2018 (for a total of 11% (9% employee side and up to 2% employer side)), not to exceed 50% of normal cost as determined by City’s Actuary • Up to an additional 1% on the employer’s side in the first full pay period of July 2018 (for a total of 12% (% employee side and up to 3% employer side)), not to exceed 50% of normal cost as determined by City’s Actuary The following is a summary of Tier 1 CalPERS contract provisions: A. One-Year Final Compensation B. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance C. Credit for Unused Sick Leave D. 4th Level 1959 Survivor Benefit. E. Military Service Credit as Prior Service F. Cost of Living Allowance (2%) G. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance Continuance H. Pre-Retirement Death Benefit for Spouse I. Retired Death Benefit $5,000 J. Prior Service Credit The contributions on the employer’s side (GC 20516) described above are “up to” amounts per fiscal year meaning the employee may be required to contribute up the full amount listed, but the amounts may be less. For example, in FY 2017- 18, the amount for Tier 1 is expected to be the full 1% of GC 20516 contribution, but for Tier 2 (miscellaneous) the amount is expected to be a 0.2% GC 20516 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 559 Page 11 of 34 contribution. In addition, the contribution amounts will be based on the City Actuary’s review of most recent CalPERS Annual Valuation Report. For FY 17/18 the most recent Annual Valuation Report was as of June 30, 2015. Tier 2: Local Miscellaneous 2% @ 60 and Local Safety 3% @ 55 Pension Contributions: PEPRA provides that equal sharing of normal costs shall be the standard. To meet that standard, Employees will continue to make the required employee contribution (with no EPMC) of 7% for Local Miscellaneous and 9% for local Safety, but will also contribute (in a phased in manner) to the employer’s side (Government Code (GC) section 20516) to reach the CalPERS standard of equal sharing of normal costs. Accordingly, Tier 2 employees shall make the following pension contributions. Local Miscellaneous unrepresented employees in Tier 2 shall contribute 7%, which will be applied to the employee contribution to CalPERS. There shall be no EPMC. In addition, Local Miscellaneous unrepresented employees in Tier 2 shall also contribute the amounts stated below on the employer’s side (GC 20516) until equal sharing of normal costs is reached: • Up to 1% in the first full pay period of July 2017 on the employer’s (for a total contribution of 8% (7% employee side and 1% employer side)), not to exceed 50% of normal cost as determined by City’s Actuary • Up to an additional 1% on the employer’s side in the first full pay period of July 2018 (for a total of 9% (7% employee side and up to 2% employer side)), not to exceed 50% of normal cost as determined by City’s Actuary • First full pay period of July 2019, 50% of normal cost as determined by City’s Actuary (including 7% on employee side plus additional amount paid to employer’s side) Local Safety unrepresented employees in Tier 2 shall contribute 9%, which will be applied to the employee’s contribution to CalPERS. There shall be no EPMC. In addition, Local Safety unrepresented employees in Tier 2 shall also contribute the amounts stated below on the employer’s side (GC 20516) until equal sharing of normal costs is reached: • Up to 1% in the first full pay period of July 2017 on the employer’s (for a total contribution of 10% (9% employee side and 1% employer side)), not to exceed 50% of normal cost as determined by City’s Actuary • Up to an additional 1% on the employer’s side in the first full pay period of July 2018 (for a total of 11% (9% employee side and up to 2% employer side)), not to exceed 50% of normal cost as determined by City’s Actuary • Up to an additional 1% on the employer’s side in the first full pay period of July 2018 (for a total of 12% (9% employee side and up to 3% employer side)), not to exceed 50% of normal cost as determined by City’s Actuary The following is a summary of Tier 2 CalPERS contract provisions: A. Three-Year Final Compensation B. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 560 Page 12 of 34 C. Credit for Unused Sick Leave D. 4th Level 1959 Survivor Benefit. E. Military Service Credit as Prior Service F. Cost of Living Allowance (2%) G. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance Continuance H. Pre-Retirement Death Benefit for Spouse I. Retired Death Benefit $5,000 J. Prior Service Credit The contributions on the employer’s side (GC 20516) described above are “up to” amounts per fiscal year meaning the employee may be required to contribute up the full amount listed, but the amounts may be less. For example, in FY 2017- 18, the amount for Tier 1 is expected to be the full 1% of GC 20516 contribution, but for Tier 2 (local miscellaneous) the amount is expected to be a 0.2% GC 20516 contribution. In addition, the contribution amounts will be based on the City Actuary’s review of most recent CalPERS Annual Valuation Report. For FY 17/18 the most recent Annual Valuation Report was as of June 30, 2015. Tier 3: Local Miscellaneous 2% @ 62 and Local Safety 2.7% @ 57 Local Miscellaneous and Local Safety unrepresented employees in Tier 3 shall be responsible for the full employee contribution which will be applied to the CalPERS employee contribution. There shall be no EPMC. PEPRA provides that equal sharing of the normal costs shall be the standard. To meet this standard, Tier 3 employees shall also make additional contributions on the employer’s side (GC 20516) (in up to 1% percent increments per fiscal year, as determined by the City’s actuary) to attain the equal cost sharing of normal costs standard. As of the approval of this Compensation Summary by City Council, no such contributions are expected the 2017-2018 Fiscal Year. To the extent permitted by Assembly Bill 340, known as the California Public Employees’ Pension Reform Act of 2013, the following is a summary of Tier 3 benefits: A. Three-Year Final Compensation B. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance C. Credit for Unused Sick Leave D. 4th Level 1959 Survivor Benefit. The monthly member cost for this benefit will be paid by the City. E. Military Service Credit as Prior Service F. Cost of Living Allowance (2%) G. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance Continuance H. Pre-Retirement Death Benefit for Spouse I. Retired Death Benefit $5,000 J. Prior Service Credit 7. Termination of Sick Leave Balances 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 561 Page 13 of 34 Upon either acceptance of an application by a Safety employee for disability retirement, or upon the independent determination of PERS that a non-safety employee is disabled, the employee shall not be entitled to use any remaining sick leave to cover absences beyond their FMLA entitlement. Sick leave balance may be applied to applicable PERS service credit. An application for industrial disability retirement, either employee or employer initiated, shall not affect the employee's rights under Workers Compensation laws, such as any otherwise existing right to Temporary Disability benefits for safety officers. 8. Sick Leave Sick leave shall accrue and be reimbursed as designated in the Civil Service Rules 9. Annual Leave a. Senior Managers shall earn a minimum of three weeks (15 days) annual leave per year during the first through ninth year of continuous service, four weeks (20 days) annual leave after completion of tenth through fourteenth year of continuous service, and five weeks (25 days) annual leave for fifteen or more years of continuous service. An employee may not accumulate more than three times the number of annual leave days accrued annually. b. Senior Managers have the option of selling back three (3) weeks of accrued annual leave each fiscal year. 10. Holidays a. Senior Managers will be credited 24 hours each fiscal year for floating holidays (Lincoln's and Washington's Birthdays, and Admission Day). b. The City will be closed on the following hard holidays: Independence Day, Labor Day, Veterans Day, Thanksgiving, day after Thanksgiving, Christmas, New Year's Day, Martin Luther King Jr.'s Birthday, Cesar Chavez Day, Memorial Day. 11. Mileage Reimbursement Employees in this unit shall be subject to a mileage reimbursement program when required to use their private automobile for authorized City business. Reimbursement rate will be tied to the IRS rate, in effect at the time reimbursement is requested, as permitted by law. 12. Administrative Leave Senior Managers will receive (ninety-six) (96) hours of Administrative Leave each fiscal year. 13. Special Assignment Pay Senior Managers may receive up to 10% additional compensation when assigned by the City Manager to a special project. 14. Uniform Allowances and Educational Differentials 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 562 Page 14 of 34 Sworn public safety Senior Managers will be provided with the uniform allowance and educational differentials as specified in the applicable public safety MOU. 15. Professional Enrichment Senior Managers are eligible to participate in the City’s Professional Enrichment Program. The annual Professional Enrichment allocation for Senior Managers of $25,000 is for exclusive use by members of the Senior Management group for conferences and training. An employee is eligible to receive up to $2,000 per fiscal year for professional enrichment. Funds may be used at any time during the fiscal year. Fiscal year reimbursements under the City’s “Professional Enrichment” will be closed the second Thursday in June. Employees may request reimbursement for professional enrichment expenses in accordance with Internal Revenue Code Section 132, or any other applicable state and federal law. Employees must receive approval from their Appointing Authority and the City Manager’s designee before funds may be claimed for reimbursement. Reimbursements are on a first come, first serve basis until the funds have been exhausted. 16. Severance Pay In the event a Senior Manager is terminated without cause, he or she shall receive compensation in a lump sum cash payment equal to three (3) months of his or her annual salary. The aforementioned severance pay shall not be reduced during the term of their employment. III. UNCLASSIFIED AND CONFIDENTIAL MIDDLE MANAGEMENT/ PROFESSIONAL GROUP – ALL EMPLOYEES PROVIDED FOR IN THIS GROUP ARE FLSA-EXEMPT; CONFIDENTIAL MIDDLE MANAGERS/PROFESSIONALS ARE CLASSIFIED UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED IN ATTACHMENT 1 – GROUP MEMBERSHIP LISTING. A. SALARY & WAGES 1. For Fiscal Year 2017-2018 - effective July7, 2017, 2%. B. BENEFITS 1. Acting Pay Unclassified and Confidential Middle Managers/Professionals shall receive Acting Pay when: a. They are temporarily assigned to a vacant position for a period of ten (10) or more consecutive work days; b. Perform the duties of a higher paid classification; and c. Receive prior approval by the City Manager or his or her designee prior to the assignment. Acting pay shall be: a. Compensated with a minimum of five percent (5%) above current salary rate, up to a maximum of 20%. b. Effective the first day of the assignment. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 563 Page 15 of 34 2. Out of Class Assignment a. Unclassified and Confidential Middle Managers/Professionals shall receive Out of Class Assignment (OCA) pay when: They are assigned to perform the duties of a higher paid classification for a period of ten (10) or more consecutive workdays; and b. Receive prior approval by the City Manager or his or her designee prior to the assignment. Out-of-Class Assignment pay shall: a. Be compensated with a minimum of five percent (5%) above current salary rate, up to a maximum of 20%. b. Be effective the first day of the assignment. c. Not exceed twelve months. Note: For clarification, OCA is differentiated from Acting Pay in that OCA is granted to an employee remaining in their current classification, but performing higher level duties even though no vacancy may exist at the higher level. Acting Pay is granted to employees assuming the duties of a vacant, higher level position for a period of time. 3. Retirement The City will provide to unrepresented members retirement benefits via contract with the California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) as set forth in the California Government Code. The City will provide the following defined benefit formulas: Tier 1 Local Miscellaneous 3% @ 60 Local Safety 3% @ 50 Tier 2* Local Miscellaneous 2% @ 60 Local Safety 3% @ 55 Tier 3** Local Miscellaneous 2% @ 62 Local Safety 2.7% @ 57 * Effective 04/22/2011 **Effective 01/01/2013 Tier 1: Local Miscellaneous 3% @ 60 and Local Safety 3% @ 50 Local Miscellaneous unrepresented employees in Tier 1 shall contribute 8%, which will be applied to the employee contribution to CalPERS. Local Safety unrepresented employees in Tier 1 shall contribute 9%, which will be applied to the employee contribution to CalPERS. There shall be no EPMC (effective October 2, 2015) for classifications without a represented counterpart. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 564 Page 16 of 34 The following is a summary of Tier 1 CalPERS contract provisions: A. One-Year Final Compensation B. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance C. Credit for Unused Sick Leave D. 4th Level 1959 Survivor Benefit. E. Military Service Credit as Prior Service F. Cost of Living Allowance (2%) G. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance Continuance H. Pre-Retirement Death Benefit for Spouse I. Retired Death Benefit $5,000 J. Prior Service Credit Tier 2: Local Miscellaneous 2% @ 60 and Local Safety 3% @ 55 Local Miscellaneous unrepresented employees in Tier 2 shall contribute 7%, which will be applied to the employee contribution to CalPERS. Local Safety unrepresented employees in Tier 2 shall contribute 9%, which will be applied to the employee contribution to CalPERS. There shall be no EPMC. The following is a summary of Tier 2 CalPERS contract provisions: A. Three-Year Final Compensation B. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance C. Credit for Unused Sick Leave D. 4th Level 1959 Survivor Benefit. E. Military Service Credit as Prior Service F. Cost of Living Allowance (2%) G. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance Continuance H. Pre-Retirement Death Benefit for Spouse I. Retired Death Benefit $5,000 J. Prior Service Credit Tier 3: Local Miscellaneous 2% @ 62 and Local Safety 2.7% @ 57 Local Miscellaneous and Local Safety unrepresented employees in Tier 3 shall be responsible for the full employee contribution, which will be applied to the CalPERS employee contribution. There shall be no EPMC. To the extent permitted by Assembly Bill 340, known as the California Public Employees’ Pension Reform Act of 2013, the following is a summary of Tier 3 benefits: A. Three-Year Final Compensation B. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 565 Page 17 of 34 C. Credit for Unused Sick Leave D. 4th Level 1959 Survivor Benefit. The monthly member cost for this benefit will be paid by the City. E. Military Service Credit as Prior Service F. Cost of Living Allowance (2%) G. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance Continuance H. Pre-Retirement Death Benefit for Spouse I. Retired Death Benefit $5,000 J. Prior Service Credit 4. Termination of Sick Leave Balances Upon either acceptance of an application by a Safety employee for disability retirement, or upon the independent determination of PERS that a non-safety employee is disabled, the employee shall not be entitled to use any remaining sick leave to cover absences beyond their FMLA entitlement. Sick leave balance may be applied to applicable PERS service credit. An application for industrial disability retirement, either employee or employer initiated, shall not affect the employee's rights under Workers Compensation laws, such as any otherwise existing right to Temporary Disability benefits for safety officers. 5. 457 Plan – Deferred Compensation Plans Employees in the Unclassified and Confidential Middle Management/Professional Group may participate in the City's approved deferred compensation plans. 6. Cafeteria Plan a. In calendar year 2017, each Unclassified and Confidential Middle Manager/Professional will receive $14,136 to be used solely for approved employee benefits or to be placed in a taxable cash option. b. In the event of increases in health care plan premiums, the City will split the cost of the increase 50/50 with the employees. The annual cafeteria plan allotment will be increased by one-half of the average cost increase for full family non- non-indemnity health plan premiums. The City's share of the increased cost will be added to the beginning cafeteria plan balance of the next available cafeteria plan year. c. From the Cafeteria Plan allotment, each represented employee must select coverage for him or herself under one of the City sponsored medical plans. However, if the employee has group medical insurance from another reliable source that is acceptable to the City of Chula Vista Department of Human Resources, the employee may elect to decline medical insurance from a City provider and apply the value, of the City’s “Flexible Benefit Plan” contribution to other available City Flex options. Any employee married to another benefited City employee who is covered under his or her spouse’s plan may waive coverage under the Cafeteria Plan and will receive full credit. Any employee who declines medical insurance coverage may enroll in the City medical plan prior to the next open enrollment only if the employee involuntarily loses the coverage. Enrollment application must be received in Human Resources within 30 days from loss of coverage. The employee, 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 566 Page 18 of 34 through payroll deductions, will pay any premium cost in excess of the Cafeteria Plan Allotment. d. The Flex Benefit Amount for Employee Only, those with coverage outside of the City, and those employees covered by another City Employee is fixed at the amount provided in the calendar year 2013 ($12,762). The flex amount for Employee+1 and Employee+Family will be adjusted under the current 50/50 cost sharing formula. 7. Life Insurance City pays for a group term life insurance policy with coverage in the amount of $50,000 per employee. 8. Retiree Healthcare The City will no longer provide for subsidized retiree health care rates by offering a blended healthcare rate for employees hired after January 1, 2011. 9. Short/Long Term Disability Insurance The City will pay the full cost of the short/long-term disability insurance premium for middle management positions. 10. Professional Enrichment The Unclassified and Confidential Middle Managers/Professionals are eligible to participate in the City’s Professional Enrichment Program. The annual Professional Enrichment Fund allocation for Unclassified and Confidential Professional Enrichment Fund of $15,600 is for exclusive use by members of the Unclassified and Confidential Middle Management/Professional group for conferences and training. An employee is eligible to receive up to $1,500 per fiscal year for professional enrichment. Funds may be used at any time during the fiscal year. Fiscal year reimbursements under the City’s “Professional Enrichment” will be closed the second Thursday in June. Employees may request reimbursement for professional enrichment expenses in accordance with Internal Revenue Code Section 132, or any other applicable state and federal law. Employees must receive approval from their Appointing Authority and the City Manager’s designee before funds may be claimed for reimbursement. Reimbursements are on a first come, first serve basis until the funds have been exhausted. 11. Sick Leave Reimbursement Sick leave shall accrue and be reimbursed as designated in the Civil Service Rules. 12. Annual Leave a. Unclassified and Confidential Middle Managers/Professionals will earn two weeks (10 days) annual leave per year in the first through fourth year of continuous employment, three weeks (15 days) annual leave per year in the fifth through ninth year of continuous service, four weeks annual leave (20 days) per year in the tenth through fourteenth year of continuous service, and five weeks annual leave (25 days) for fifteen or more years of continuous 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 567 Page 19 of 34 service. An employee may not accumulate more than three times the number of annual leave days accrued annually. b. Unclassified and Confidential Middle Managers/Professionals who have completed at least five (5) years of service shall have the option of selling back a total of 80 hours of accrued annual leave two times per fiscal year in 40 hour increments. 13. Administrative Leave Unclassified and Confidential Middle Managers/Professionals, will receive eighty- eighty (88) hours of Administrative Leave each fiscal year. 14. Holidays a. Unclassified and Confidential Middle Managers/Professionals will receive 24 hours each fiscal year for floating holidays (Lincoln's and Washington's Birthdays, and Admission Day). b. The City will be closed on the following hard holidays: Independence Day, Labor Day, Veterans Day, Thanksgiving, Day After Thanksgiving, Christmas, New Year's Day, Martin Luther King Jr.'s Birthday, Cesar Chavez Day, Memorial Day. 15. Mileage Reimbursement Unclassified and Confidential Middle Managers/Professionals shall be subject to a mileage reimbursement program when required to use their private automobile for authorized City business. Reimbursement rate will be tied to the IRS rate, in effect at the time reimbursement is requested, as permitted by law. 16. Uniform Allowances & Educational Differentials Sworn public safety Unclassified and Confidential Middle Managers/Professionals will be provided with the uniform allowances and educational differentials as specified in the applicable public safety MOU. 17. Bilingual Pay Those Unclassified and Confidential Middle Managers/Professionals who, upon recommendation of their Department Head, approval of the Director of Human Resources, and successful completion of a bilingual performance evaluation will receive $100 per month in addition to their regular pay on the condition that they continuously utilize their bilingual skills in the performance of their duties effective the first full pay period after adoption. 18. Special Assignment Pay Unclassified and Confidential Middle Managers/Professionals may receive up to 10% additional compensation when assigned by the City Manager to a special project. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 568 Page 20 of 34 IV. CONFIDENTIAL GROUP – ARE CLASSIFIED UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED IN ATTACHMENT 1 – GROUP MEMBERSHIP LISTING. A. SALARY & WAGES B. BENEFITS 1. Retirement The City will provide to unrepresented members retirement benefits via contract with the California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) as set forth in the California Government Code. The City will provide the following defined benefit formulas: Tier 1 Local Miscellaneous 3% @ 60 Local Safety 3% @ 50 Tier 2* Local Miscellaneous 2% @ 60 Local Safety 3% @ 55 Tier 3** Local Miscellaneous 2% @ 62 Local Safety 2.7% @ 57 * Effective 04/22/2011 **Effective 01/01/2013 Tier 1: Local Miscellaneous 3% @ 60 and Local Safety 3% @ 50 Local Miscellaneous unrepresented employees in Tier 1 shall contribute 8%, which will be applied to the City’s contribution (employer’s side) to CalPERS for optional benefits. The City will contribute 8% to be applied to the employee’s contribution for CalPERS retirement benefits. Local Safety unrepresented employees in Tier 1 shall contribute 9%, which will be applied to the City’s contribution (employer’s side) to CalPERS for optional benefits. The City will contribute 8%, to be applied to the employee’s contribution, for CalPERS retirement benefits. Effective October 2, 2015, for those unrepresented confidential employees listed in Attachment 2, they shall contribute 8% (or 9% if in local safety) for the employees contribution for CalPERS retirement benefits, resulting in the elimination of EPMC. Said employees shall simultaneously cease to pay 8%, on employer side, for optional benefits. The following is a summary of Tier 1 CalPERS contract provisions: 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 569 Page 21 of 34 A. One-Year Final Compensation B. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance C. Credit for Unused Sick Leave D. 4th Level 1959 Survivor Benefit. E. Military Service Credit as Prior Service F. Cost of Living Allowance (2%) G. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance Continuance H. Pre-Retirement Death Benefit for Spouse I. Retired Death Benefit $5,000 J. Prior Service Credit K. For classifications with a represented counterpart, Employer Paid Member Contributions reported as earnings (but not for employees in Attachment 2). Tier 2: Local Miscellaneous 2% @ 60 and Local Safety 3% @ 55 Local Miscellaneous unrepresented employees in Tier 2 shall contribute 7%, which will be applied to the employee contribution to CalPERS. Local Safety unrepresented employees in Tier 2 shall contribute 9%, which will be applied to the employee contribution to CalPERS. There shall be no EPMC. The following is a summary of Tier 2 CalPERS contract provisions: A. Three-Year Final Compensation B. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance C. Credit for Unused Sick Leave D. 4th Level 1959 Survivor Benefit. E. Military Service Credit as Prior Service F. Cost of Living Allowance (2%) G. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance Continuance H. Pre-Retirement Death Benefit for Spouse I. Retired Death Benefit $5,000 J. Prior Service Credit Tier 3: Local Miscellaneous 2% @ 62 and Local Safety 2.7% @ 57 Local Miscellaneous and Local Safety unrepresented employees in Tier 3 shall be responsible for the full employee contribution, which will be applied to the CalPERS employee contribution. There shall be no EPMC. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 570 Page 22 of 34 To the extent permitted by Assembly Bill 340, known as the California Public Employees’ Pension Reform Act of 2013, the following is a summary of Tier 3 benefits: A. Three-Year Final Compensation B. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance C. Credit for Unused Sick Leave D. 4th Level 1959 Survivor Benefit. The monthly member cost for this benefit will be paid by the City. E. Military Service Credit as Prior Service F. Cost of Living Allowance (2%) G. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance Continuance H. Pre-Retirement Death Benefit for Spouse I. Retired Death Benefit $5,000 J. Prior Service Credit 2. Termination of Sick Leave Balances Upon either acceptance of an application by a Safety employee for disability retirement, or upon the independent determination of CalPERS that a non-safety employee is disabled, the employee shall not be entitled to use any remaining sick leave to cover absences beyond their FMLA entitlement. Sick leave balances may be applied to applicable CalPERS service credit. An application for industrial disability retirement, either employee or employer initiated, shall not affect the employee's rights under Workers’ Compensation laws, such as any otherwise existing right to Temporary Disability benefits for safety officers. 3. Deferred Compensation Plans 457 Plan - Employees in the Confidential Group may participate in the City's approved deferred compensation plans. 4. Cafeteria Plan a. In calendar year 2017, each Confidential Employee will received $13,760 to be used solely for approved employee benefits or to be placed in a taxable cash option. b. In the event of increases in health care plan premiums, the City will split the cost of the increase 50/50 with the employees. The annual cafeteria plan allotment will be increased by one-half of the average cost increase for full family non-indemnity health plan premiums. The City's share of the increased cost will be added to the beginning cafeteria plan balance of the next available cafeteria plan year. c. From the annual Cafeteria Plan allotment, each employee must elect medical coverage under one of the City sponsored plans, unless the employee has group medical insurance from another source including coverage under their City employee spouse’s plan in which case they may waive coverage so long as the alternative plan is deemed to be an acceptable plan by the City. When waiving coverage the full value of the Cafeteria Plan allotment will be 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 571 Page 23 of 34 available to purchase any of the other options available under the Cafeteria Plan. Waiver of coverage is irrevocable during a plan year unless the City is notified within 30 days that the employee has involuntarily lost the alternative coverage. d. The Flex Benefit Amount for Employee Only, those with coverage outside of the City, and those employees covered by another City Employee is fixed at the amount provided in the calendar year 2013 ($12,386). The flex amount for Employee+1 and Employee+Family will be adjusted under the current 50/50 cost sharing formula. 5. Short/Long Term Disability Insurance The City will pay the full cost of the short/long-term disability insurance premium for the Confidential employees. 6. Retiree Healthcare The City will no longer provide for subsidized retiree health care rates by offering a blended healthcare rate for employees hired after January 1, 2011. 7. Professional Enrichment The Confidential Employees Professional Enrichment Fund of $6,250 is for exclusive use by members of the Confidential Employees for conferences and training. Employees may receive up to a maximum of $1,000 per fiscal year. Funds may be used at any time during the fiscal year. Fiscal year reimbursements under the City’s “Professional Enrichment” will be closed the second Thursday in June. Employees may request reimbursement for professional enrichment expenses in accordance with Internal Revenue Code Section 132, or any other applicable state and federal law. Employees must receive approval from their Appointing Authority and the City Manager’s designee before funds may be claimed for reimbursement. Reimbursements are on a first come, first serve basis until the funds have been exhausted. 8. Life Insurance City pays for a Group Term Life and AD&D insurance policy with coverage in the amount of $50,000 per employee. 9. Sick Leave Sick leave shall accrue and be reimbursed as designated in the Civil Service Rules. 10. Annual Leave a. Employees will accrue 80-hours during the first through fourth years of service (cumulative to a total leave balance of 240-hours). This benefit will be accumulated at the rate of 3.07 working hours for each full biweekly pay period of service performed. b. Employees will accrue and be eligible to receive 120-hours (cumulative to a total leave balance of 360-hours) during the fifth through ninth year of service. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 572 Page 24 of 34 The benefits will be accumulated at the rate of 4.60 working hours for each full biweekly pay period of service performed. c. Employees will accrue and be eligible to receive 160-hours (cumulative to a total leave balance of 480-hours) during the tenth through fourteenth years of service. This benefit will be accumulated at the rate of 6.14 working hours for each full biweekly pay period of service performed. d. Employees will accrue and be eligible to receive 200-hours (cumulative to a total leave balance of 600-hours) during the fifteenth and succeeding years of service. This benefit will be accumulated at the rate of 7.70 working hours for each full biweekly pay period of service performed. e. Vacation accrual rate changes will become effective at the beginning of the pay period closest to the actual date which includes the employee anniversary date of benefited status. f. Vacation sell back – All confidential unrepresented classifications who have completed at least five (5) years of service shall have the option of selling up to 60-hours of said vacation back to the City one time per fiscal year. The accumulated vacation balance will be reduced accordingly. g. Each part time confidential unrepresented employee paid at a biweekly rate shall be entitled to vacation with pay. The number of working days of such vacation shall be computed on the basis set forth in subsection (a), (b), (c), or (d) and shall be in the proportion that such part time employment bears to full time employment. h. Employees separated from City service, whether voluntarily or involuntarily, shall be granted all of the unused vacation to which they are entitled based upon continuous service computed on the basis set forth in subsection (a), (b), (c), or (d). Payment shall be made hour-for-hour with any portion of an hour being considered a full hour. i. Vacation Use: Vacation leave balances shall be reduced for actual time not worked to the nearest quarter hour. Absences may not be charged to vacation not already accumulated. 11. Holidays a. Confidential employees will receive 24 hours each fiscal year for floating holidays (Lincoln's and Washington Birthday's, and Admissions Day). b. The City will be closed on the following paid hard holidays: Independence Day, Labor Day, Veterans Day, Thanksgiving, Day after Thanksgiving, Christmas, New Year's Day, Martin Luther King Jr.'s Birthday, Cesar Chavez Day, Memorial Day. 12. Administration Leave 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 573 Page 25 of 34 Confidential employees will receive forty (40) hours of Administrative Leave each fiscal year. 13. Mileage Reimbursement Employees in this unit shall be subject to a mileage reimbursement program when required to use their private automobile for authorized City business. Reimbursement rate will be tied to the IRS rate in effect at the time reimbursement is requested, as permitted by law. 14. Bilingual Pay Those employees who, upon recommendation of the Department Head, approval of the Director of Human Resources Department, and successful completion of a Bilingual Performance Evaluation, and who are required to continuously use their bilingual skills in the performance of their duties, will receive $100 per month in addition to their regular pay effective the first full pay period after adoption. 15. Special Assignment Pay Confidential employees may be eligible to receive a maximum of 15% above their base pay when assigned by the Appointing Authority or designee and approved by the City Manager and the Director of Human Resources to a “Special Project.” 16. Out-of-Class Assignment When an employee is assigned to perform duties of a higher paid classification, immediately upon assignment, the employee shall be compensated with a minimum of 7.5% above the employee’s current salary rate up to a maximum of 15% effective the first day of the out-of-class assignment. If the out of class assignment lasts for duration of 6 months the employee will receive an additional 5% compensation. Increases greater than 5% must be approved by the Director of Human Resources. Requests for out-of-class compensation shall be submitted by the Appointing Authority on a “Payroll Change Notice” form as percentage amounts only. 17. Notice of Change in Work Schedule The City will strive to give at least fourteen calendar day (14 calendar days) notice to employees when management initiates a change in an employee’s work schedule except in cases of emergencies. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 574 Page 26 of 34 V. MAYOR, COUNCIL AND CITY ATTORNEY A. SALARY & WAGES 1. Salary Increases As mandated by City of Chula Vista City Charter Section 302 the Mayor shall receive an annual salary equivalent to 66% of the salary of a Judge of the Superior Court of the State of California. As mandated in City of Chula Vista City Charter Section 304(C), the four Council members shall receive 40% of the salary of the Mayor. Salary adjustments will occur at the same time and be effective on the same date as the Superior Court Judges. As mandated by City of Chula Vista City Charter Section 503(C) the City Attorney shall receive an annual salary equivalent to the salary of a Judge of the Superior Court of the State of California. Salary adjustments will occur at the same time and be effective on the same date as the Superior Court Judges. B. BENEFITS 1. Cafeteria Plan Cafeteria plans will be set at the level specified for Executive Managers. The cafeteria plan is to be used solely for approved employee benefits or to be placed in a taxable cash option. From the annual Cafeteria Plan allotment, each employee must elect medical coverage under one of the City sponsored plans, unless the employee has group medical insurance from another source including coverage under their City employee spouse’s plan in which case they may waive coverage so long as the alternative plan is deemed to be an acceptable plan by the City. When waiving coverage the full value of the Cafeteria Plan allotment will be available to purchase any of the other options available under the Cafeteria Plan. Waiver of coverage is irrevocable during a plan year unless the City is notified within 30 days that the employee has involuntarily lost the alternative coverage. The Flex Benefit Amount for Employee Only, those with coverage outside of the City, and those employees covered by another City Employee is fixed at the amount provided in the calendar year 2017 ($16,536). The flex amount for Employee+1 and Employee+Family will be adjusted under the current 50/50 cost sharing formula. a) For calendar year 2017 the maximum taxable option shall be $15,162 b) For calendar year 2018 the maximum taxable option shall be $12,000 c) For calendar year 2019 the maximum taxable option shall be $10,000 d) For calendar year 2020 the maximum taxable option shall be $8,000 2. Retiree Healthcare The City will no longer provide for subsidized retiree health care rates by offering a blended healthcare rate for employees hired after January 1, 2011. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 575 Page 27 of 34 3. Auto Allowance The Mayor may elect to receive a monthly auto allowance up to $1,000. Council members and City Attorney may elect to receive a monthly auto allowance of up to $550. The allowance is contingent upon evidence of adequate auto insurance. 4. Travel Reimbursements The Mayor and Council members shall receive reimbursement on order of the City Council for Council-authorized travel and other expenses when on official duty outside of the City. 5. Stipends The Mayor and Council members will receive $50 stipend for attending Housing Authority meetings. No member shall receive compensation for attending more than four meetings of the Housing Authority during any calendar month. 6. Retirement The City will provide to unrepresented members retirement benefits via contract with the California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) as set forth in the California Government Code. The City will provide the following defined benefit formulas: Tier 1 Local Miscellaneous 3% @ 60 Local Safety 3% @ 50 Tier 2* Local Miscellaneous 2% @ 60 Local Safety 3% @ 55 Tier 3** Local Miscellaneous 2% @ 62 Local Safety 2.7% @ 57 * Effective 04/22/2011 ** Effective 01/01/2013 Tier 1: Local Miscellaneous 3% @ 60 Pension Contributions: PEPRA provides that equal sharing of normal costs shall be the standard. To reach that standard, Tier 1 Employees will continue to make the required employee contribution (with no EPMC) of 8% for Local Miscellaneous and will contribute the below amounts (in a phased in manner) to the employer’s side (pursuant to Government Code (GC) section 20516) to reach the CalPERS standard of equal sharing of normal costs. Accordingly, Tier 1 Employees shall make the following pension contributions. Local Miscellaneous unrepresented employees in Tier 1 shall contribute 8%, which will be applied to the employee’s contribution to CalPERS. There shall be 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 576 Page 28 of 34 no EPMC. In addition, Local Miscellaneous unrepresented employees in Tier 1 shall also contribute the amounts stated below on the employer’s side (GC 20516) until equal sharing of normal costs is reached: • Up to 1% in the first full pay period of July 2017 on the employer’s (for a total contribution of 9% (8% employee side and 1% employer side)), not to exceed 50% of normal cost as determined by City’s Actuary • Up to an additional 1% on the employer’s side in the first full pay period of July 2018 (for a total of 10% (8% employee side and up to 2% employer side)), not to exceed 50% of normal cost as determined by City’s Actuary • First full pay period of July 2019, 50% of normal cost as determined by City’s Actuary (including 8% on employee side plus additional amount paid to employer’s side) The following is a summary of Tier 1 CalPERS contract provisions: K. One-Year Final Compensation L. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance M. Credit for Unused Sick Leave N. 4th Level 1959 Survivor Benefit. O. Military Service Credit as Prior Service P. Cost of Living Allowance (2%) Q. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance Continuance R. Pre-Retirement Death Benefit for Spouse S. Retired Death Benefit $5,000 T. Prior Service Credit The contributions on the employer’s side (GC 20516) described above are “up to” amounts per fiscal year meaning the employee may be required to contribute up the full amount listed, but the amounts may be less. For example, in FY 2017- 18, the amount for Tier 1 is expected to be the full 1% of GC 20516 contribution, but for Tier 2 (miscellaneous) the amount is expected to be a 0.2% GC 20516 contribution. In addition, the contribution amounts will be based on the City Actuary’s review of most recent CalPERS Annual Valuation Report. For FY 17/18 the most recent Annual Valuation Report was as of June 30, 2015. Tier 2: Local Miscellaneous 2% @ Pension Contributions: PEPRA provides that equal sharing of normal costs shall be the standard. To meet that standard, Employees will continue to make the required employee contribution (with no EPMC) of 7% for Local Miscellaneous and will also contribute (in a phased in manner) to the employer’s side (Government Code (GC) section 20516) to reach the CalPERS standard of equal sharing of normal costs. Accordingly, Tier 2 employees shall make the following pension contributions. Local Miscellaneous unrepresented employees in Tier 2 shall contribute 7%, which will be applied to the employee contribution to CalPERS. There shall be no EPMC. In addition, Local Miscellaneous unrepresented employees in Tier 2 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 577 Page 29 of 34 shall also contribute the amounts stated below on the employer’s side (GC 20516) until equal sharing of normal costs is reached: • Up to 1% in the first full pay period of July 2017 on the employer’s (for a total contribution of 8% (7% employee side and 1% employer side)), not to exceed 50% of normal cost as determined by City’s Actuary • Up to an additional 1% on the employer’s side in the first full pay period of July 2018 (for a total of 9% (7% employee side and up to 2% employer side)), not to exceed 50% of normal cost as determined by City’s Actuary • First full pay period of July 2019, 50% of normal cost as determined by City’s Actuary (including 7% on employee side plus additional amount paid to employer’s side) The following is a summary of Tier 2 CalPERS contract provisions: A. Three-Year Final Compensation B. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance C. Credit for Unused Sick Leave D. 4th Level 1959 Survivor Benefit. E. Military Service Credit as Prior Service F. Cost of Living Allowance (2%) G. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance Continuance H. Pre-Retirement Death Benefit for Spouse I. Retired Death Benefit $5,000 J. Prior Service Credit The contributions on the employer’s side (GC 20516) described above are “up to” amounts per fiscal year meaning the employee may be required to contribute up the full amount listed, but the amounts may be less. For example, in FY 2017- 18, the amount for Tier 1 is expected to be the full 1% of GC 20516 contribution, but for Tier 2 (local miscellaneous) the amount is expected to be a 0.2% GC 20516 contribution. In addition, the contribution amounts will be based on the City Actuary’s review of most recent CalPERS Annual Valuation Report. For FY 17/18 the most recent Annual Valuation Report was as of June 30, 2015. Tier 3: Local Miscellaneous 2% @ 62 Local Miscellaneous unrepresented employees in Tier 3 shall be responsible for the full employee contribution which will be applied to the CalPERS employee contribution. There shall be no EPMC. PEPRA provides that equal sharing of the normal costs shall be the standard. To meet this standard, Tier 3 employees shall also make additional contributions on the employer’s side (GC 20516) (in up to 1% percent increments per fiscal year, as determined by the City’s actuary) to attain the equal cost sharing of normal costs standard. As of the approval of this Compensation Summary by City Council, no such contributions are expected the 2017-2018 Fiscal Year. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 578 Page 30 of 34 To the extent permitted by Assembly Bill 340, known as the California Public Employees’ Pension Reform Act of 2013, the following is a summary of Tier 3 benefits: A. Three-Year Final Compensation B. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance C. Credit for Unused Sick Leave D. 4th Level 1959 Survivor Benefit. The monthly member cost for this benefit will be paid by the City. E. Military Service Credit as Prior Service F. Cost of Living Allowance (2%) G. Post-Retirement Survivor Allowance Continuance H. Pre-Retirement Death Benefit for Spouse I. Retired Death Benefit $5,000 J. Prior Service Credit (Remainder of page intentionally left blank.) 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 579 Page 31 of 34 VI. UNCLASSIFIED HOURLY EMPLOYEES A. SALARY & WAGES 1. Salary Increase The minimum wage for all unclassified hourly employees will be set by the State of California or Federal Government, whichever is higher: Pay period including January 1, 2017: $10.50/hr Pay Period including January 1, 2018: $11:00/hr Pay Period including January 1, 2019: $12:00/hr Pay Period including January 1, 2020: $13:00/hr B. BENEFITS 1. Retirement a. UCHR employees are enrolled in the Public Agency Retirement System Alternate Retirement Systems (PARS-ARS) b. The City pays 3.75% of the employee’s salary into the employee’s PARS- ARS account. c. Each pay period 3.75% will be deducted from the employee’s salary and deposited to the employee’s PARS-ARS account. 2. Sick Leave Sick Leave shall accrue pursuant to the Health Workplace, Health Family Act of 2014 (AB 1522). (Remainder of page intentionally left blank.) 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 580 Page 32 of 34 ATTACHMENT 1 – GROUP MEMBERSHIP LISTING The following shows the classifications assigned to each group as of October 2015. A. EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT GROUP1 City Manager (Contract) City Clerk (Contract) Assistant City Manager Chief of Police FA Executive Director Deputy City Manager Development Services Department Director Director of Economic Development Director of Engineering /City Engineer Director of Finance Director of Human Resources Director of Information Technology Services Director of Library Director of Public Works Director of Recreation Fire Chief Senior Assistant City Attorney (Contract) B. SENIOR MANAGEMENT GROUP1 Administrative Services Manager Animal Care Facility Administrator Assistant City Attorney Assistant City Clerk Assistant Chief of Police Assistant Director of Development Services Assistant Director of Engineering Assistant Director of Finance Assistant Director of Human Resources Assistant Director of Public Works Assistant Director of Recreation Budget and Analysis Manager Building Official/Code Enforcement Manager FA Deputy Director-SD LECC FA Deputy Executive Director FA Director-SD LECC Deputy City Attorney III Deputy Fire Chief FA Director of SD LECC FA IVDC-LECC Executive Director FA Program Manager Finance and Purchasing Manager 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 581 Page 33 of 34 Housing Manager Human Resources Operations Manager Information Technology Manager Marketing and Communications Manager Performance and Organizational Development Manager Planning Manager Police Administrative Services Administrator Police Captain Purchasing Agent Risk Manager C. UNCLASSIFIED AND CONFIDENTIAL MIDDLE MANAGEMENT/PROFESSIONAL GROUP1 Benefits Manager MM-Confidential Chief of Staff MM-Unclassified Deputy City Attorney I Professional-Unclassified Deputy City Attorney II Professional-Unclassified Deputy City Clerk I Professional-Unclassified Deputy City Clerk II Professional-Unclassified FA Geospatial Intel Analyst Professional-Unclassified FA Financial Manager MM-Unclassified FA Microcomputer Specialist Professional-Unclassified FA Network Administrator I Professional-Unclassified FA Network Administrator II Professional-Unclassified FA Program Analyst Professional-Unclassified FA Program Assistant Supervisor Professional-Unclassified FA Public Private Partnership and Exercise Program Manager MM-Unclassified FA Information Security Program Manager MM-Unclassified FA LECC IT Manager MM-Unclassified FA Senior Financial Analyst Professional-Unclassified FA Senior Intelligence Analyst Professional-Unclassified FA Supervisory Intelligence Analyst Professional-Unclassified Fire Division Chief MM-Unclassified Fiscal and Management Analyst Professional-Confidential Fiscal Debt Management Analyst MM-Confidential Human Resources Analyst Professional-Confidential Law Office Manager MM-Unclassified Policy Aide Professional-Unclassified Principal Human Resources Analyst Professional-Confidential Principal Management Analyst Professional-Confidential Real Property Manager MM-Unclassified Risk Management Specialist Professional-Confidential Senior Accountant MM-Confidential Senior Deputy City Clerk Professional-Unclassified Senior Human Resources Analyst Professional-Confidential Senior Risk Management Specialist Professional-Confidential 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 582 Page 34 of 34 Special Events Coordinator Professional-Unclassified D. CONFIDENTIAL GROUP1 Accountant Accounting Technician (Finance/Payroll) Administrative Secretary Administrative Secretary (Mayor’s Office/At-Will) Confidential-Unclassified Associate Accountant Constituent Services Representative Confidential-Unclassified Executive Secretary Confidential-Unclassified FA Accounting Technician Confidential-Unclassified FA Administrative Analyst I Confidential-Unclassified FA Administrative Analyst II Confidential-Unclassified FA Analyst Confidential-Unclassified FA Executive Assistant Confidential-Unclassified FA Graphic Designer/Webmaster Confidential-Unclassified FA Intelligence Analyst Confidential-Unclassified FA Management Assistant Confidential-Unclassified FA Program Assistant Confidential-Unclassified FA RCFL Network Engineer Confidential-Unclassified FA Senior Program Assistant FA Senior Secretary Confidential-Unclassified Human Resources Technician Legal Assistant Public Information Specialist Senior Council Assistant Confidential-Unclassified Senior Legal Assistant Senior Human Resources Technician Senior Legal Assistant 1 The City of Chula Vista serves as a pass through agency for the San Diego and Imperial Counties High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area (HIDTA); HIDTA positions (with the "CBAG" or "FA" designation) shall receive the benefit package detailed for the Executive, Senior, Middle Management/Professional Unclassified, and Confidential group in which the CBAG or FA classification is designated. All HIDTA positions are unclassified. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 583 Fiscal Year 2017‐2018 Compensation Schedule Effective September 15, 2017 Position Title PCN BARG Step A Step B Step C Step D Step E Step A Step B Step C Step D Step E ACCOUNTANT 3633 CONF $32.89 $34.53 $36.26 $38.07 $39.97 $2,630.97 $2,762.51 $2,900.64 $3,045.68 $3,197.95 ACCOUNTING ASSISTANT 3641 ACE $20.12 $21.12 $22.18 $23.29 $24.45 $1,609.30 $1,689.76 $1,774.26 $1,862.97 $1,956.12 ACCOUNTING ASSISTANT (HRLY)3640 UCHR $20.12 $21.12 $22.18 $23.29 $24.45 $1,609.30 $1,689.76 $1,774.26 $1,862.97 $1,956.12 ACCOUNTING TECH (HOURLY)3676 UCHR $25.45 $26.72 $28.06 $29.46 $30.93 $2,035.77 $2,137.55 $2,244.43 $2,356.65 $2,474.49 ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN 3675 ACE $25.45 $26.72 $28.06 $29.46 $30.93 $2,035.77 $2,137.55 $2,244.43 $2,356.65 $2,474.49 ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN 3643 CONF $25.45 $26.72 $28.06 $29.46 $30.93 $2,035.77 $2,137.55 $2,244.43 $2,356.65 $2,474.49 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE SUPERVISOR 3645 ACE $29.26 $30.73 $32.26 $33.88 $35.57 $2,341.13 $2,458.19 $2,581.10 $2,710.15 $2,845.65 ADMIN SECRETARY (MAYOR,ATWILL) 0154 CONF $24.86 $26.10 $27.41 $28.78 $30.22 $1,988.74 $2,088.18 $2,192.58 $2,302.21 $2,417.32 ADMIN SERVICES MANAGER 0215 SM $45.49 ‐‐‐$55.29 $3,638.83 ‐‐‐$4,423.03 ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY 0179 ACE $24.86 $26.10 $27.41 $28.78 $30.22 $1,988.74 $2,088.18 $2,192.58 $2,302.21 $2,417.32 ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY 0149 CONF $24.86 $26.10 $27.41 $28.78 $30.22 $1,988.74 $2,088.18 $2,192.58 $2,302.21 $2,417.32 ADMINISTRATIVE TECH (HOURLY)0127 UCHR $24.86 $26.10 $27.41 $28.78 $30.22 $1,988.74 $2,088.18 $2,192.58 $2,302.21 $2,417.32 ADMINISTRATIVE TECHNICIAN 0181 ACE $24.86 $26.10 $27.41 $28.78 $30.22 $1,988.74 $2,088.18 $2,192.58 $2,302.21 $2,417.32 ADMINISTRATIVE TECHNICIAN 0147 CONF $24.86 $26.10 $27.41 $28.78 $30.22 $1,988.74 $2,088.18 $2,192.58 $2,302.21 $2,417.32 ANIMAL ADOPTION COUNSELOR 5310 ACE $21.51 $22.59 $23.72 $24.90 $26.15 $1,720.90 $1,806.94 $1,897.29 $1,992.15 $2,091.76 ANIMAL CARE AIDE (HRLY)5316 UCHR $11.32 $11.91 $12.55 $13.20 $13.90 $905.56 $953.01 $1,003.78 $1,056.21 $1,111.98 ANIMAL CARE FAC ADMINISTRATOR 5327 SM $53.00 ‐‐‐$64.42 $4,239.78 ‐‐‐$5,153.48 ANIMAL CARE SPECIALIST 5343 ACE $18.04 $18.94 $19.89 $20.88 $21.92 $1,443.00 $1,515.15 $1,590.91 $1,670.46 $1,753.98 ANIMAL CARE SPECIALIST (HRLY)5344 UCHR $18.04 $18.94 $19.89 $20.88 $21.92 $1,443.00 $1,515.15 $1,590.91 $1,670.46 $1,753.98 ANIMAL CARE SUPERVISOR 5319 ACE $25.05 $26.30 $27.61 $29.00 $30.44 $2,003.77 $2,103.96 $2,209.16 $2,319.62 $2,435.59 ANIMAL CONTROL OFFICER 5303 ACE $21.65 $22.73 $23.86 $25.06 $26.31 $1,731.60 $1,818.18 $1,909.09 $2,004.55 $2,104.77 ANIMAL CONTROL OFFICER (HRLY)5305 UCHR $21.65 $22.73 $23.86 $25.06 $26.31 $1,731.60 $1,818.18 $1,909.09 $2,004.55 $2,104.77 ANIMAL CTRL OFFCR SUPERVISOR 5304 ACE $24.89 $26.14 $27.44 $28.82 $30.26 $1,991.34 $2,090.90 $2,195.45 $2,305.22 $2,420.49 ANIMAL SERVICES SPECIALIST 5309 ACE $19.68 $20.66 $21.69 $22.78 $23.92 $1,574.19 $1,652.90 $1,735.54 $1,822.31 $1,913.43 APPLICATIONS SUPPORT MANAGER 3083 MM $42.19 $44.30 $46.52 $48.85 $51.29 $3,375.57 $3,544.34 $3,721.56 $3,907.64 $4,103.02 APPLICATIONS SUPPORT SPEC 3088 PROF $33.85 $35.54 $37.32 $39.18 $41.14 $2,707.68 $2,843.07 $2,985.22 $3,134.48 $3,291.20 AQUARIST 7741 ACE $22.41 $23.53 $24.70 $25.94 $27.23 $1,792.46 $1,882.07 $1,976.18 $2,074.99 $2,178.74 AQUATIC SUPERVISOR I 7579 ACE $22.98 $24.13 $25.33 $26.60 $27.93 $1,838.31 $1,930.22 $2,026.74 $2,128.07 $2,234.47 AQUATIC SUPERVISOR II 7577 ACE $25.28 $26.54 $27.87 $29.26 $30.72 $2,022.13 $2,123.24 $2,229.40 $2,340.87 $2,457.92 AQUATIC SUPERVISOR III 7575 ACE $29.07 $30.52 $32.05 $33.65 $35.33 $2,325.46 $2,441.74 $2,563.82 $2,692.01 $2,826.62 ASSISTANT CITY CLERK 2210 SM $39.96 ‐‐‐$48.57 $3,196.80 ‐‐‐$3,885.73 ASSISTANT DIR OF DEV SERVICES 4040 SM $67.02 ‐‐‐$81.46 $5,361.64 ‐‐‐$6,517.11 ASSOC ACCOUNTANT 3635 CONF $36.18 $37.98 $39.88 $41.88 $43.97 $2,894.05 $3,038.76 $3,190.69 $3,350.23 $3,517.74 ASSOC ENGINEER 6017 WCE $40.40 $42.42 $44.54 $46.77 $49.11 $3,232.02 $3,393.62 $3,563.31 $3,741.47 $3,928.54 ASSOC LAND SURVEYOR 6287 WCE $40.40 $42.42 $44.54 $46.77 $49.11 $3,232.02 $3,393.62 $3,563.31 $3,741.47 $3,928.54 ASSOC PLAN CHECK ENGINEER 4747 WCE $40.40 $42.42 $44.54 $46.77 $49.11 $3,232.02 $3,393.62 $3,563.31 $3,741.47 $3,928.54 ASSOC PLANNER 4437 ACE $32.61 $34.24 $35.95 $37.75 $39.64 $2,608.66 $2,739.09 $2,876.05 $3,019.85 $3,170.84 ASSOC PLANNER (HOURLY)4438 UCHR $32.61 $34.24 $35.95 $37.75 $39.64 $2,608.66 $2,739.09 $2,876.05 $3,019.85 $3,170.84 ASST CHIEF OF POLICE 5011 SM $65.74 ‐‐‐$79.91 $5,259.55 ‐‐‐$6,393.01 ASST CITY ATTORNEY 2405 SM $70.20 ‐‐‐$85.32 $5,615.65 ‐‐‐$6,825.86 ASST CITY MANAGER/ADMIN 2707 EXEC $90.26 ‐‐‐$109.71 $7,220.50 ‐‐‐$8,776.56 ASST DIR HUMAN RESOURCES 3304 SM $60.37 ‐‐‐$73.38 $4,829.29 ‐‐‐$5,870.03 ASST DIR OF FINANCE 3604 SM $60.37 ‐‐‐$73.38 $4,829.29 ‐‐‐$5,870.03 ASST DIR OF PUBLIC WORKS 6322 SM $63.91 ‐‐‐$77.68 $5,112.40 ‐‐‐$6,214.16 ASST DIR OF RECREATION 7401 SM $50.21 ‐‐‐$61.02 $4,016.43 ‐‐‐$4,882.00 ASST DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING 6008 SM $63.91 ‐‐‐$77.68 $5,112.40 ‐‐‐$6,214.16 ASST ENGINEER 6015 WCE $35.13 $36.89 $38.73 $40.67 $42.70 $2,810.46 $2,950.98 $3,098.53 $3,253.46 $3,416.13 ASST LAND SURVEYOR 6289 WCE $35.13 $36.89 $38.73 $40.67 $42.70 $2,810.46 $2,950.98 $3,098.53 $3,253.46 $3,416.13 ASST PLAN CHECK ENGINEER 4749 WCE $35.13 $36.89 $38.73 $40.67 $42.70 $2,810.45 $2,950.98 $3,098.52 $3,253.45 $3,416.12 ASST PLANNER 4439 ACE $29.64 $31.13 $32.68 $34.32 $36.03 $2,371.52 $2,490.09 $2,614.60 $2,745.32 $2,882.59 AUTOMATED FINGERPRINT TECH 5123 ACE $19.68 $20.66 $21.69 $22.78 $23.92 $1,574.19 $1,652.90 $1,735.54 $1,822.31 $1,913.43 BENEFITS MANAGER 3404 MMCF $44.83 $47.07 $49.42 $51.89 $54.49 $3,586.13 $3,765.43 $3,953.71 $4,151.39 $4,358.96 BLDG PROJECT MANAGER 6412 PROF $40.05 $42.05 $44.15 $46.36 $48.68 $3,203.77 $3,363.96 $3,532.16 $3,708.77 $3,894.21 BUDGET & ANALYSIS MANAGER 2222 SM $51.75 ‐‐‐$62.91 $4,140.27 ‐‐‐$5,032.53 BUILDING INSPECTION MGR 4769 MM $42.17 $44.28 $46.50 $48.82 $51.26 $3,373.85 $3,542.54 $3,719.66 $3,905.65 $4,100.93 BUILDING INSPECTOR I 4771 ACE $28.71 $30.14 $31.65 $33.23 $34.89 $2,296.45 $2,411.27 $2,531.84 $2,658.43 $2,791.35 BUILDING INSPECTOR II 4773 ACE $31.58 $33.16 $34.81 $36.55 $38.38 $2,526.11 $2,652.41 $2,785.03 $2,924.28 $3,070.50 BUILDING INSPECTOR II HRLY 4774 UCHR $31.58 $33.16 $34.81 $36.55 $38.38 $2,526.11 $2,652.41 $2,785.03 $2,924.28 $3,070.50 BUILDING INSPECTOR III 4775 ACE $34.73 $36.47 $38.29 $40.21 $42.22 $2,778.71 $2,917.65 $3,063.53 $3,216.71 $3,377.54 BUILDING OFFICIAL/CODE ENF MGR 4780 SM $63.83 ‐‐‐$77.58 $5,106.33 ‐‐‐$6,206.77 BUILDING SERVICES SUPERVISOR 6669 ACE $27.75 $29.14 $30.60 $32.13 $33.74 $2,220.32 $2,331.33 $2,447.90 $2,570.30 $2,698.81 BUSINESS LICENSE REP 4505 ACE $20.12 $21.12 $22.18 $23.29 $24.45 $1,609.30 $1,689.76 $1,774.26 $1,862.97 $1,956.12 CARPENTER 6444 ACE $25.05 $26.30 $27.62 $29.00 $30.45 $2,003.93 $2,104.13 $2,209.33 $2,319.81 $2,435.80 All position titles designated as Executive (“EXEC”) or Senior Management (“SM”) have salary bands with a minimum (“Step A”) and maximum (“Step E”) salary; salary appointments and subsequent adjustments within the approved salary range may be made by the position’s appointing authority. Hourly Rate Bi‐Weekly Rate Approved and Adopted: Resolution No.: 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 584 Fiscal Year 2017‐2018 Compensation Schedule Effective September 15, 2017 Position Title PCN BARG Step A Step B Step C Step D Step E Step A Step B Step C Step D Step E Hourly Rate Bi‐Weekly Rate CHIEF OF POLICE 5001 EXEC $85.90 ‐‐‐$104.42 $6,872.22 ‐‐‐$8,353.23 CHIEF OF STAFF 2011 MMUC $34.98 $36.73 $38.56 $40.49 $42.52 $2,798.26 $2,938.17 $3,085.08 $3,239.34 $3,401.30 CHIEF SUSTAINABILITY OFFICER 2729 SM $60.37 ‐‐‐$73.38 $4,829.29 ‐‐‐$5,870.03 CITY ATTORNEY (ELECTED)2400 CATY ‐‐‐‐$92.12 ‐‐‐‐$7,369.70 CITY CLERK 2201 CCLK ‐‐‐‐$72.89 ‐‐‐‐$5,830.95 CITY ENGINEER 6010 SM $61.21 ‐‐‐$74.40 $4,896.85 ‐‐‐$5,952.15 CITY MANAGER 2710 CMGR ‐‐‐‐$121.07 ‐‐‐‐$9,685.36 CIVIL BCKGRND INVEST (HOURLY)5430 UCHR $23.81 $25.00 $26.25 $27.56 $28.94 $1,904.76 $1,999.99 $2,099.99 $2,204.99 $2,315.24 CIVILIAN BACKGROUND INVEST 5429 ACE $23.81 $25.00 $26.25 $27.56 $28.94 $1,904.76 $1,999.99 $2,099.99 $2,204.99 $2,315.24 CIVILIAN POLICE INVESTIGATOR 5431 UCHR $25.79 $27.08 $28.43 $29.85 $31.35 $2,063.15 $2,166.32 $2,274.63 $2,388.36 $2,507.78 CLERICAL AIDE 0241 UCHR $10.55 $11.07 $11.63 $12.21 $12.82 $843.66 $885.84 $930.14 $976.64 $1,025.47 CODE ENF OFFICER I 4777 ACE $24.93 $26.18 $27.49 $28.86 $30.31 $1,994.72 $2,094.46 $2,199.18 $2,309.14 $2,424.60 CODE ENF OFFICER I (HOURLY)4776 UCHR $24.93 $26.18 $27.49 $28.86 $30.31 $1,994.72 $2,094.46 $2,199.18 $2,309.14 $2,424.60 CODE ENF OFFICER II 4779 ACE $27.43 $28.80 $30.24 $31.75 $33.34 $2,194.19 $2,303.90 $2,419.10 $2,540.05 $2,667.06 CODE ENF OFFICER II (HOURLY)4778 UCHR $27.43 $28.80 $30.24 $31.75 $33.34 $2,194.19 $2,303.90 $2,419.10 $2,540.05 $2,667.06 CODE ENFORCEMENT TECHNICIAN 4789 ACE $21.68 $22.77 $23.90 $25.10 $26.35 $1,734.54 $1,821.27 $1,912.33 $2,007.95 $2,108.34 COLLECTIONS SUPERVISOR 3683 MM $35.01 $36.76 $38.60 $40.53 $42.56 $2,800.99 $2,941.04 $3,088.09 $3,242.49 $3,404.62 COMMUNITY SERV OFFICER 5141 ACE $19.68 $20.66 $21.69 $22.78 $23.92 $1,574.19 $1,652.90 $1,735.54 $1,822.31 $1,913.43 CONSERVATION SPECIALIST I 6200 ACE $22.67 $23.80 $24.99 $26.24 $27.55 $1,813.38 $1,904.06 $1,999.26 $2,099.22 $2,204.18 CONSERVATION SPECIALIST II 6202 ACE $24.93 $26.18 $27.49 $28.86 $30.31 $1,994.72 $2,094.46 $2,199.18 $2,309.14 $2,424.60 CONSTITUENT SERVICES REPRESENTATIVE 2039 CONF ‐‐‐‐$23.08 ‐‐‐‐$1,846.16 CONSTRUCTION & REPAIR SUPVSR 6427 ACE $34.78 $36.52 $38.35 $40.27 $42.28 $2,782.72 $2,921.86 $3,067.95 $3,221.34 $3,382.42 COUNCIL ASSISTANT 2023 UCHR $22.91 $24.06 $25.26 $26.52 $27.85 $1,832.86 $1,924.50 $2,020.73 $2,121.76 $2,227.85 COUNCILPERSON 2003 CL ‐‐‐‐$24.32 ‐‐‐‐$1,945.60 CRIME LABORATORY MANAGER 5101 MM $45.34 $47.61 $49.99 $52.49 $55.11 $3,627.09 $3,808.44 $3,998.86 $4,198.81 $4,408.75 CULTURAL ARTS PROGRAM MGR 4435 PROF $38.00 $39.90 $41.89 $43.99 $46.19 $3,039.79 $3,191.78 $3,351.37 $3,518.94 $3,694.89 CUSTODIAL SUPERVISOR 6667 ACE $23.01 $24.16 $25.37 $26.64 $27.97 $1,841.10 $1,933.16 $2,029.82 $2,131.31 $2,237.88 CUSTODIAN 6661 ACE $18.19 $19.10 $20.06 $21.06 $22.11 $1,455.41 $1,528.18 $1,604.59 $1,684.82 $1,769.06 CUSTODIAN (HOURLY)6662 UCHR $18.19 $19.10 $20.06 $21.06 $22.11 $1,455.41 $1,528.18 $1,604.59 $1,684.82 $1,769.06 DELIVERY DRIVER 7191 ACE $16.68 $17.51 $18.39 $19.31 $20.27 $1,334.13 $1,400.84 $1,470.88 $1,544.43 $1,621.65 DEP CITY MANAGER 2705 EXEC $85.90 ‐‐‐$104.42 $6,872.22 ‐‐‐$8,353.23 DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY I 2410 PRUC $41.96 $44.05 $46.26 $48.57 $51.00 $3,356.45 $3,524.27 $3,700.49 $3,885.51 $4,079.79 DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY II 2408 PRUC $50.35 $52.86 $55.51 $58.28 $61.20 $4,027.73 $4,229.12 $4,440.58 $4,662.60 $4,895.73 DEPUTY CITY ATTY III 2411 SM $63.19 ‐‐‐$76.81 $5,055.10 ‐‐‐$6,144.50 DEPUTY CITY CLERK I 2245 PRUC $25.94 $27.24 $28.60 $30.03 $31.54 $2,075.54 $2,179.31 $2,288.28 $2,402.69 $2,522.83 DEPUTY CITY CLERK II 2243 PRUC $28.54 $29.97 $31.46 $33.04 $34.69 $2,283.10 $2,397.26 $2,517.12 $2,642.98 $2,775.12 DEPUTY FIRE CHIEF 5505 SM $65.36 ‐‐‐$79.45 $5,229.01 ‐‐‐$6,355.90 DETENTION FACILITY MANAGER 5130 MM $45.34 $47.61 $49.99 $52.49 $55.11 $3,627.09 $3,808.44 $3,998.86 $4,198.81 $4,408.75 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TECH I 4542 ACE $20.51 $21.53 $22.61 $23.74 $24.93 $1,640.76 $1,722.80 $1,808.94 $1,899.39 $1,994.36 DEVELOPMENT SVCS DEPT DIR 4039 EXEC $78.44 ‐‐‐$95.35 $6,275.36 ‐‐‐$7,627.73 DEVELOPMENT SVCS TECH II 4541 ACE $22.56 $23.69 $24.87 $26.12 $27.42 $1,804.84 $1,895.08 $1,989.83 $2,089.33 $2,193.79 DEVELOPMENT SVCS TECH III 4543 ACE $25.94 $27.24 $28.60 $30.03 $31.54 $2,075.56 $2,179.34 $2,288.31 $2,402.72 $2,522.86 DEVLPMENT SVCS TECH II (HRLY)4544 UCHR $22.56 $23.69 $24.87 $26.12 $27.42 $1,804.84 $1,895.08 $1,989.83 $2,089.33 $2,193.79 DEVLPMT SVCS COUNTER MGR 4547 MM $43.74 $45.92 $48.22 $50.63 $53.16 $3,498.91 $3,673.85 $3,857.54 $4,050.42 $4,252.94 DIR OF ECON DEVELOPMENT 2734 EXEC $72.82 ‐‐‐$88.51 $5,825.27 ‐‐‐$7,080.66 DIR OF ENG/CITY ENGINEER 6006 EXEC $72.82 ‐‐‐$88.51 $5,825.28 ‐‐‐$7,080.66 DIR OF FINANCE 3601 EXEC $78.43 ‐‐‐$95.33 $6,274.52 ‐‐‐$7,626.71 DIR OF HUMAN RESOURCES 3303 EXEC $72.82 ‐‐‐$88.51 $5,825.27 ‐‐‐$7,080.66 DIR OF INFO TECH SVCS 3001 EXEC $72.82 ‐‐‐$88.51 $5,825.27 ‐‐‐$7,080.66 DIR OF LIBRARY 7002 EXEC $72.82 ‐‐‐$88.51 $5,825.27 ‐‐‐$7,080.66 DIR OF PUBLIC WORKS 6320 EXEC $78.43 ‐‐‐$95.33 $6,274.52 ‐‐‐$7,626.71 DIR OF RECREATION 7405 EXEC $67.33 ‐‐‐$81.84 $5,386.25 ‐‐‐$6,547.02 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST I 2747 ACE $27.17 $28.53 $29.96 $31.46 $33.03 $2,173.88 $2,282.58 $2,396.71 $2,516.54 $2,642.37 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST II 2749 ACE $32.61 $34.24 $35.95 $37.75 $39.64 $2,608.66 $2,739.09 $2,876.05 $3,019.85 $3,170.84 ELECTRICIAN 6438 ACE $26.30 $27.62 $29.00 $30.45 $31.97 $2,104.14 $2,209.34 $2,319.82 $2,435.81 $2,557.59 ELECTRONIC/EQUIP INSTALLER 6492 ACE $23.91 $25.11 $26.36 $27.68 $29.06 $1,912.86 $2,008.50 $2,108.92 $2,214.37 $2,325.09 ELECTRONICS TECH SUPERVISOR 6472 ACE $33.27 $34.94 $36.68 $38.52 $40.44 $2,661.79 $2,794.88 $2,934.63 $3,081.36 $3,235.42 ELECTRONICS TECHNICIAN 6475 ACE $28.93 $30.38 $31.90 $33.49 $35.17 $2,314.61 $2,430.33 $2,551.85 $2,679.44 $2,813.42 EMERGENCY SVCS COORDINATOR 5564 PROF $37.78 $39.67 $41.65 $43.74 $45.92 $3,022.47 $3,173.60 $3,332.28 $3,498.89 $3,673.84 EMS NURSE COORDINATOR 5567 PROF $47.79 $50.18 $52.69 $55.32 $58.09 $3,823.07 $4,014.22 $4,214.94 $4,425.68 $4,646.97 ENGINEERING TECH I 6081 ACE $24.96 $26.21 $27.52 $28.90 $30.34 $1,996.92 $2,096.76 $2,201.60 $2,311.68 $2,427.26 ENGINEERING TECH II 6071 ACE $27.46 $28.83 $30.27 $31.79 $33.37 $2,196.61 $2,306.44 $2,421.76 $2,542.85 $2,669.99 ENVIRON SUSTAINABILITY MGR 6207 MM $47.50 $49.88 $52.37 $54.99 $57.74 $3,800.10 $3,990.10 $4,189.60 $4,399.09 $4,619.04 ENVIRONMENTAL HLTH SPECIALIST 6129 ACE $33.01 $34.66 $36.40 $38.22 $40.13 $2,640.94 $2,772.99 $2,911.63 $3,057.21 $3,210.07 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES MGR 6205 MM $47.50 $49.88 $52.37 $54.99 $57.74 $3,800.10 $3,990.10 $4,189.60 $4,399.09 $4,619.04 Approved and Adopted: Resolution No.: 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 585 Fiscal Year 2017‐2018 Compensation Schedule Effective September 15, 2017 Position Title PCN BARG Step A Step B Step C Step D Step E Step A Step B Step C Step D Step E Hourly Rate Bi‐Weekly Rate EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE MANAGER 6505 MM $37.42 $39.29 $41.26 $43.32 $45.48 $2,993.63 $3,143.31 $3,300.48 $3,465.50 $3,638.78 EQUIPMENT MECHANIC 6542 ACE $24.82 $26.06 $27.36 $28.73 $30.17 $1,985.57 $2,084.84 $2,189.08 $2,298.55 $2,413.47 EQUIPMENT OPERATOR 6361 ACE $26.42 $27.74 $29.12 $30.58 $32.11 $2,113.26 $2,218.92 $2,329.87 $2,446.36 $2,568.68 EXECUTIVE SECRETARY 0187 CONF $30.08 $31.58 $33.16 $34.82 $36.56 $2,406.38 $2,526.70 $2,653.03 $2,785.68 $2,924.96 FA ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN 5270 CONF $25.45 $26.72 $28.06 $29.46 $30.93 $2,035.77 $2,137.55 $2,244.43 $2,356.65 $2,474.49 FA ADMIN ANALYST I 5297 CONF $27.95 $29.35 $30.81 $32.36 $33.97 $2,236.00 $2,347.81 $2,465.19 $2,588.45 $2,717.87 FA ADMIN ANALYST II 5296 CONF $30.75 $32.28 $33.90 $35.59 $37.37 $2,459.60 $2,582.58 $2,711.71 $2,847.30 $2,989.66 FA ANALYST 5277 CONF $21.36 $22.43 $23.55 $24.73 $25.96 $1,708.68 $1,794.11 $1,883.82 $1,978.01 $2,076.91 FA DEPUTY DIRECTOR SD LECC 5465 SM $46.91 $49.25 $51.72 $54.30 $57.02 $3,752.67 $3,940.30 $4,137.31 $4,344.18 $4,561.39 FA DEPUTY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 5463 SM $50.17 ‐‐‐$60.98 $4,013.46 ‐‐‐$4,878.38 FA DIRECTOR OF SD LECC 5274 SM ‐‐‐‐$71.73 ‐‐‐‐$5,738.31 FA EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT 5286 CONF $27.36 $28.73 $30.17 $31.68 $33.26 $2,189.13 $2,298.59 $2,413.52 $2,534.19 $2,660.91 FA EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 5461 EXEC $59.01 ‐‐‐$71.73 $4,720.92 ‐‐‐$5,738.31 FA FINANCIAL MANAGER 5493 MMUC $46.33 $48.64 $51.08 $53.63 $56.31 $3,706.21 $3,891.52 $4,086.10 $4,290.40 $4,504.92 FA GEOSPATIAL INTEL ANALYST 5439 PRUC $40.21 $42.22 $44.33 $46.55 $48.87 $3,216.70 $3,377.53 $3,546.41 $3,723.73 $3,909.92 FA GRAPHIC DESIGNER/WBMSTR 5289 CONF $28.91 $30.36 $31.88 $33.47 $35.14 $2,312.97 $2,428.63 $2,550.06 $2,677.56 $2,811.44 FA INFO SECURITY PROGRAM MGR 5453 MMUC $46.90 $49.25 $51.71 $54.30 $57.01 $3,752.30 $3,939.91 $4,136.91 $4,343.75 $4,560.94 FA INTELLIGENCE ANALYST 5485 CONF $28.91 $30.36 $31.88 $33.47 $35.14 $2,312.97 $2,428.63 $2,550.06 $2,677.56 $2,811.44 FA IVDC‐LECC EXEC DIRECTOR 5491 SM $51.02 $53.57 $56.24 $59.06 $62.01 $4,081.26 $4,285.33 $4,499.59 $4,724.57 $4,960.80 FA LECC IT MANAGER 5440 MMUC $42.89 $45.03 $47.29 $49.65 $52.13 $3,431.14 $3,602.70 $3,782.84 $3,971.98 $4,170.58 FA MANAGEMENT ASSISTANT 5278 CONF $26.06 $27.36 $28.73 $30.17 $31.68 $2,084.89 $2,189.13 $2,298.60 $2,413.53 $2,534.20 FA MICROCOMPUTER SPECIALIST 5443 PRUC $34.87 $36.62 $38.45 $40.37 $42.39 $2,789.73 $2,929.22 $3,075.68 $3,229.47 $3,390.94 FA NTWRK ADMINISTRATOR I 5292 PRUC $35.09 $36.85 $38.69 $40.63 $42.66 $2,807.55 $2,947.93 $3,095.32 $3,250.09 $3,412.59 FA NTWRK ADMINISTRATOR II 5294 PRUC $38.60 $40.53 $42.56 $44.69 $46.92 $3,088.31 $3,242.72 $3,404.86 $3,575.10 $3,753.86 FA PROG ASST SUPERVISOR 5452 PRUC $30.26 $31.77 $33.36 $35.03 $36.78 $2,420.65 $2,541.68 $2,668.76 $2,802.20 $2,942.31 FA PROGRAM ANALYST 5444 PRUC $41.60 $43.68 $45.87 $48.16 $50.57 $3,328.25 $3,494.66 $3,669.39 $3,852.86 $4,045.50 FA PROGRAM ASSISTANT 5451 CONF $20.82 $21.86 $22.95 $24.10 $25.30 $1,665.44 $1,748.71 $1,836.15 $1,927.96 $2,024.35 FA PROGRAM MANAGER 5445 SM $46.91 $49.25 $51.72 $54.30 $57.02 $3,752.67 $3,940.30 $4,137.31 $4,344.18 $4,561.39 FA PUB‐PRVT PART EXER PRG MGR 5497 MMUC $43.62 $45.80 $48.09 $50.50 $53.02 $3,489.60 $3,664.08 $3,847.28 $4,039.65 $4,241.63 FA RCFL NETWRK ENGINEER 5284 CONF $33.55 $35.23 $36.99 $38.84 $40.78 $2,684.14 $2,818.34 $2,959.26 $3,107.22 $3,262.58 FA SR FINANCIAL ANALYST 5495 PRUC $32.60 $34.23 $35.94 $37.74 $39.63 $2,608.16 $2,738.57 $2,875.49 $3,019.27 $3,170.23 FA SR INTELLIGENCE ANALYST 5483 PRUC $34.33 $36.05 $37.85 $39.75 $41.73 $2,746.66 $2,883.99 $3,028.19 $3,179.60 $3,338.58 FA SR PROGRAM ASSISTANT 5454 CONF $24.77 $26.01 $27.31 $28.67 $30.11 $1,981.45 $2,080.52 $2,184.55 $2,293.78 $2,408.47 FA SR SECRETARY 5477 CONF $21.42 $22.49 $23.61 $24.79 $26.03 $1,713.26 $1,798.92 $1,888.87 $1,983.31 $2,082.48 FA SUPV INTELLIGENCE ANALYST 5481 PRUC $37.77 $39.65 $41.64 $43.72 $45.91 $3,021.32 $3,172.39 $3,331.01 $3,497.56 $3,672.44 FACILITIES MANAGER 6425 MM $42.62 $44.75 $46.99 $49.34 $51.81 $3,409.70 $3,580.19 $3,759.20 $3,947.16 $4,144.52 FACILITY & SUPPLY SPECIALIST 5648 ACE $21.39 $22.46 $23.58 $24.76 $26.00 $1,710.92 $1,796.47 $1,886.29 $1,980.60 $2,079.63 FACILITY & SUPPLY SPEC (HRLY)5646 UCHR $21.39 $22.46 $23.58 $24.76 $26.00 $1,710.92 $1,796.47 $1,886.29 $1,980.60 $2,079.63 FIELD MAINTENANCE SPECIALIST 7471 ACE $19.44 $20.41 $21.44 $22.51 $23.63 $1,555.39 $1,633.16 $1,714.82 $1,800.56 $1,890.58 FINANCE & PURCHASING MGR 3625 SM $56.49 ‐‐‐$68.67 $4,519.38 ‐‐‐$5,493.33 FIRE APPARATUS MECH 6521 ACE $29.77 $31.26 $32.82 $34.46 $36.18 $2,381.44 $2,500.52 $2,625.54 $2,756.82 $2,894.66 FIRE BATTALION CHIEF (112 HR)5511 IAFF $36.12 $37.92 $39.82 $41.81 $43.90 $4,045.30 $4,247.56 $4,459.94 $4,682.94 $4,917.08 FIRE BATTALION CHIEF (80 HR)5513 IAFF $50.57 $53.09 $55.75 $58.54 $61.46 $4,045.30 $4,247.56 $4,459.94 $4,682.94 $4,917.08 FIRE CAPTAIN (112 HR)5583 IAFF $28.99 $30.44 $31.96 $33.56 $35.24 $3,247.23 $3,409.59 $3,580.07 $3,759.07 $3,947.03 FIRE CAPTAIN (80 HR)5581 IAFF $40.59 $42.62 $44.75 $46.99 $49.34 $3,247.23 $3,409.59 $3,580.07 $3,759.07 $3,947.03 FIRE CAPTAIN (INTERIM)5580 IAFF $28.99 $30.44 $31.96 $33.56 $35.24 $3,247.23 $3,409.59 $3,580.07 $3,759.07 $3,947.03 FIRE CHIEF 5501 EXEC $78.43 ‐‐‐$95.33 $6,274.53 ‐‐‐$7,626.73 FIRE DIVISION CHIEF 5507 MMUC $57.60 $60.48 $63.50 $66.68 $70.01 $4,607.72 $4,838.11 $5,080.02 $5,334.02 $5,600.72 FIRE ENG (112 HR)5603 IAFF $24.72 $25.96 $27.25 $28.62 $30.05 $2,768.66 $2,907.08 $3,052.44 $3,205.06 $3,365.32 FIRE ENG (80 HR)5601 IAFF $34.61 $36.34 $38.16 $40.06 $42.07 $2,768.66 $2,907.08 $3,052.44 $3,205.06 $3,365.32 FIRE ENGINEER (INTERIM)5602 IAFF $24.72 $25.96 $27.25 $28.62 $30.05 $2,768.66 $2,907.08 $3,052.44 $3,205.06 $3,365.32 FIRE INSP/INVEST I 5530 IAFF $29.27 $30.73 $32.27 $33.88 $35.58 $2,341.53 $2,458.61 $2,581.53 $2,710.61 $2,846.15 FIRE INSP/INVEST I (HRLY)5534 UCHR $29.27 $30.73 $32.27 $33.88 $35.58 $2,341.53 $2,458.61 $2,581.53 $2,710.61 $2,846.15 FIRE INSP/INVEST II 5531 IAFF $32.20 $33.81 $35.50 $37.27 $39.13 $2,575.67 $2,704.46 $2,839.68 $2,981.66 $3,130.75 FIRE INSP/INVEST II HRLY 5532 UCHR $32.20 $33.81 $35.50 $37.27 $39.13 $2,575.67 $2,704.46 $2,839.68 $2,981.66 $3,130.75 FIRE PREV ENG/INVEST 5528 IAFF $38.83 $40.77 $42.81 $44.95 $47.20 $3,106.58 $3,261.91 $3,425.00 $3,596.25 $3,776.06 FIRE PREVENTION AIDE 5535 ACE $14.11 $14.81 $15.55 $16.33 $17.15 $1,128.69 $1,185.12 $1,244.38 $1,306.60 $1,371.92 FIRE PREVENTION AIDE (HRLY)5533 UCHR $13.97 $14.67 $15.40 $16.17 $16.98 $1,117.51 $1,173.39 $1,232.06 $1,293.66 $1,358.34 FIRE RECRUIT 5625 ACE $22.41 $23.53 ‐‐‐$1,792.81 $1,882.45 ‐‐‐ FIREFIGHTER (112 HR)5623 IAFF $21.01 $22.06 $23.16 $24.32 $25.54 $2,353.06 $2,470.72 $2,594.25 $2,723.97 $2,860.16 FIREFIGHTER (80 HR)5621 IAFF $29.41 $30.88 $32.43 $34.05 $35.75 $2,353.06 $2,470.72 $2,594.25 $2,723.97 $2,860.16 FIREFIGHTER/PARAMEDIC (112 HR)5613 IAFF $24.16 $25.37 $26.64 $27.97 $29.37 $2,706.02 $2,841.32 $2,983.39 $3,132.55 $3,289.18 FIREFIGHTER/PARAMEDIC (80 HR)5611 IAFF $33.83 $35.52 $37.29 $39.16 $41.11 $2,706.02 $2,841.32 $2,983.39 $3,132.55 $3,289.18 FISCAL & MANAGEMENT ANALYST 0216 PRCF $42.96 $45.11 $47.37 $49.74 $52.22 $3,437.19 $3,609.04 $3,789.50 $3,978.97 $4,177.92 FISCAL DEBT MGMT ANALYST 3627 MMCF $42.96 $45.11 $47.37 $49.74 $52.22 $3,437.19 $3,609.04 $3,789.50 $3,978.97 $4,177.92 Approved and Adopted: Resolution No.: 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 586 Fiscal Year 2017‐2018 Compensation Schedule Effective September 15, 2017 Position Title PCN BARG Step A Step B Step C Step D Step E Step A Step B Step C Step D Step E Hourly Rate Bi‐Weekly Rate FISCAL OFFICE SPEC (HOURLY)0170 UCHR $18.58 $19.51 $20.49 $21.51 $22.59 $1,486.72 $1,561.06 $1,639.11 $1,721.06 $1,807.11 FISCAL OFFICE SPECIALIST 0169 ACE $18.58 $19.51 $20.49 $21.51 $22.59 $1,486.72 $1,561.06 $1,639.11 $1,721.06 $1,807.11 FLEET INVENTORY CONTROL SPEC 6513 ACE $24.59 $25.82 $27.12 $28.47 $29.89 $1,967.56 $2,065.93 $2,169.23 $2,277.69 $2,391.58 FLEET MANAGER 6501 MM $41.57 $43.65 $45.83 $48.12 $50.53 $3,325.60 $3,491.88 $3,666.48 $3,849.80 $4,042.29 FORENSICS SPECIALIST 5114 ACE $29.47 $30.95 $32.49 $34.12 $35.82 $2,357.71 $2,475.60 $2,599.39 $2,729.35 $2,865.82 GARDENER (SEASONAL)6629 UCHR $18.19 $19.10 $20.06 $21.06 $22.11 $1,455.41 $1,528.18 $1,604.59 $1,684.82 $1,769.06 GARDENER I 6627 ACE $18.19 $19.10 $20.06 $21.06 $22.11 $1,455.41 $1,528.18 $1,604.59 $1,684.82 $1,769.06 GARDENER II 6623 ACE $20.01 $21.01 $22.06 $23.17 $24.32 $1,600.96 $1,681.00 $1,765.06 $1,853.31 $1,945.98 GIS MANAGER 3079 MM $42.61 $44.74 $46.98 $49.33 $51.80 $3,409.01 $3,579.46 $3,758.43 $3,946.35 $4,143.67 GIS SPECIALIST 3081 ACE $29.68 $31.16 $32.72 $34.36 $36.07 $2,374.28 $2,492.99 $2,617.65 $2,748.52 $2,885.95 GIS SPECIALIST (HOURLY)3092 UCHR $29.68 $31.16 $32.72 $34.36 $36.07 $2,374.28 $2,492.99 $2,617.65 $2,748.52 $2,885.95 GRAFFITI ABATEMENT COORDINATOR 6339 ACE $30.20 $31.71 $33.30 $34.96 $36.71 $2,416.27 $2,537.09 $2,663.95 $2,797.14 $2,937.00 GRAPHIC DESIGNER 2775 ACE $26.29 $27.61 $28.99 $30.44 $31.96 $2,103.29 $2,208.46 $2,318.88 $2,434.83 $2,556.56 GYMNASTIC SPECIALIST 7543 UCHR $15.10 $15.86 $16.65 $17.48 $18.36 $1,208.09 $1,268.50 $1,331.92 $1,398.52 $1,468.44 HOUSING MANAGER 4093 SM $52.05 ‐‐‐$63.27 $4,164.13 ‐‐‐$5,061.53 HR ANALYST 3310 PRCF $33.16 $34.82 $36.56 $38.39 $40.31 $2,653.13 $2,785.78 $2,925.07 $3,071.33 $3,224.89 HR OPERATIONS MANAGER 3317 SM $54.03 ‐‐‐$65.67 $4,322.20 ‐‐‐$5,253.66 HR TECHNICIAN 3315 CONF $23.62 $24.80 $26.04 $27.34 $28.71 $1,889.31 $1,983.77 $2,082.95 $2,187.10 $2,296.46 HVAC TECHNICIAN 6430 ACE $26.30 $27.62 $29.00 $30.45 $31.97 $2,104.14 $2,209.34 $2,319.82 $2,435.81 $2,557.59 INFO TECH MANAGER 5104 SM $51.27 ‐‐‐$62.32 $4,101.60 ‐‐‐$4,985.53 INFO TECH SUPPORT SPECIALIST 3014 PROF $34.87 $36.62 $38.45 $40.37 $42.39 $2,789.73 $2,929.22 $3,075.68 $3,229.47 $3,390.94 INFO TECHNOLOGY TECHNICIAN 3017 ACE $24.47 $25.69 $26.98 $28.32 $29.74 $1,957.41 $2,055.28 $2,158.05 $2,265.95 $2,379.25 INTERN, GRADUATE 0269 UCHR $13.33 $14.00 $14.70 $15.43 $16.20 $1,066.42 $1,119.74 $1,175.73 $1,234.51 $1,296.24 INTERN, UNDERGRADUATE 0267 UCHR $12.12 $12.72 $13.36 $14.03 $14.73 $969.47 $1,017.95 $1,068.84 $1,122.29 $1,178.40 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 4480 PROF $38.00 $39.90 $41.89 $43.99 $46.19 $3,039.79 $3,191.78 $3,351.37 $3,518.94 $3,694.89 LANDSCAPE INSPECTOR 6291 ACE $28.71 $30.14 $31.65 $33.23 $34.89 $2,296.47 $2,411.28 $2,531.86 $2,658.44 $2,791.37 LANDSCAPE PLANNER I 4482 ACE $29.64 $31.13 $32.68 $34.32 $36.03 $2,371.51 $2,490.08 $2,614.59 $2,745.31 $2,882.58 LANDSCAPE PLANNER II 4483 ACE $32.61 $34.24 $35.95 $37.75 $39.64 $2,608.66 $2,739.09 $2,876.05 $3,019.85 $3,170.84 LATENT PRINT EXAMINER 5111 ACE $33.89 $35.59 $37.37 $39.23 $41.20 $2,711.38 $2,846.95 $2,989.29 $3,138.76 $3,295.69 LATENT PRINT EXAMINER HRLY 5112 UCHR $33.89 $35.59 $37.37 $39.23 $41.20 $2,711.38 $2,846.95 $2,989.29 $3,138.76 $3,295.69 LAW OFFICE MANAGER 2465 MMUC $34.94 $36.69 $38.52 $40.45 $42.47 $2,795.14 $2,934.89 $3,081.64 $3,235.72 $3,397.51 LEAD CUSTODIAN 6663 ACE $20.01 $21.01 $22.06 $23.17 $24.32 $1,600.96 $1,681.00 $1,765.06 $1,853.31 $1,945.98 LEGAL ASSISTANT 0183 CONF $25.11 $26.36 $27.68 $29.06 $30.52 $2,008.44 $2,108.86 $2,214.30 $2,325.01 $2,441.26 LIBRARIAN I 7075 ACE $24.10 $25.31 $26.58 $27.90 $29.30 $1,928.35 $2,024.78 $2,126.01 $2,232.31 $2,343.93 LIBRARIAN I (HOURLY)7076 UCHR $24.10 $25.31 $26.58 $27.90 $29.30 $1,928.35 $2,024.78 $2,126.01 $2,232.31 $2,343.93 LIBRARIAN II 7073 ACE $26.51 $27.84 $29.23 $30.69 $32.23 $2,121.18 $2,227.24 $2,338.60 $2,455.53 $2,578.31 LIBRARIAN II (HOURLY)7074 UCHR $26.51 $27.84 $29.23 $30.69 $32.23 $2,121.18 $2,227.24 $2,338.60 $2,455.53 $2,578.31 LIBRARIAN III 7071 ACE $29.17 $30.62 $32.16 $33.76 $35.45 $2,333.31 $2,449.99 $2,572.48 $2,701.10 $2,836.16 LIBRARY AIDE 7181 UCHR $10.55 $11.07 $11.63 $12.21 $12.82 $843.66 $885.84 $930.14 $976.64 $1,025.47 LIBRARY ASSISTANT 7157 ACE $17.15 $18.00 $18.90 $19.85 $20.84 $1,371.67 $1,440.26 $1,512.26 $1,587.88 $1,667.28 LIBRARY ASSOCIATE 7091 ACE $21.67 $22.75 $23.89 $25.09 $26.34 $1,733.64 $1,820.32 $1,911.34 $2,006.91 $2,107.25 LIBRARY ASSOCIATE (HOURLY)7092 UCHR $21.67 $22.75 $23.89 $25.09 $26.34 $1,733.64 $1,820.32 $1,911.34 $2,006.91 $2,107.25 LIBRARY DIGITAL SERVICES MGR 7025 MM $41.31 $43.37 $45.54 $47.82 $50.21 $3,304.68 $3,469.92 $3,643.41 $3,825.58 $4,016.86 LIBRARY OPERATIONS MANAGER 7029 MM $47.53 $49.90 $52.40 $55.02 $57.77 $3,802.09 $3,992.20 $4,191.81 $4,401.40 $4,621.47 LIBRARY TECHNICIAN 7121 ACE $19.72 $20.70 $21.74 $22.83 $23.97 $1,577.43 $1,656.30 $1,739.12 $1,826.07 $1,917.37 LIBRARY TECHNICIAN (HOURLY)7122 UCHR $19.72 $20.70 $21.74 $22.83 $23.97 $1,577.43 $1,656.30 $1,739.12 $1,826.07 $1,917.37 LIBRARY VISITOR ASSISTANT 7185 UCHR $13.25 $13.92 $14.61 $15.34 $16.11 $1,060.32 $1,113.34 $1,169.01 $1,227.46 $1,288.83 LIFEGUARD I 7587 UCHR $13.82 $14.52 $15.24 $16.00 $16.80 $1,105.96 $1,161.26 $1,219.33 $1,280.29 $1,344.31 LIFEGUARD II 7585 UCHR $15.21 $15.97 $16.77 $17.60 $18.48 $1,216.59 $1,277.42 $1,341.29 $1,408.36 $1,478.77 LOCKSMITH 6443 ACE $25.05 $26.30 $27.62 $29.00 $30.45 $2,003.93 $2,104.13 $2,209.33 $2,319.81 $2,435.80 MAINTENANCE WORKER I 6377 ACE $18.19 $19.10 $20.06 $21.06 $22.11 $1,455.41 $1,528.18 $1,604.59 $1,684.82 $1,769.06 MAINTENANCE WORKER I (HRLY)6379 UCHR $18.19 $19.10 $20.06 $21.06 $22.11 $1,455.41 $1,528.18 $1,604.59 $1,684.82 $1,769.06 MAINTENANCE WORKER II 6373 ACE $20.01 $21.01 $22.06 $23.17 $24.32 $1,600.96 $1,681.00 $1,765.06 $1,853.31 $1,945.98 MAINTENANCE WORKER II HRLY 6381 UCHR $20.01 $21.01 $22.06 $23.17 $24.32 $1,600.96 $1,681.00 $1,765.06 $1,853.31 $1,945.98 MANAGEMENT ANALYST 0225 ACE $30.75 $32.28 $33.90 $35.59 $37.37 $2,459.60 $2,582.58 $2,711.71 $2,847.30 $2,989.66 MARKTNG & COMMUNICATIONS MGR 2781 SM $55.27 ‐‐‐$67.18 $4,421.38 ‐‐‐$5,374.22 MAYOR 2001 MY ‐‐‐‐$60.80 ‐‐‐‐$4,864.00 MECHANIC ASSISTANT 6550 ACE $19.99 $20.99 $22.04 $23.14 $24.30 $1,599.14 $1,679.10 $1,763.06 $1,851.21 $1,943.78 MUSEUM ATTENDANT 7215 UCHR $10.94 $11.49 $12.06 $12.67 $13.30 $875.38 $919.15 $965.11 $1,013.36 $1,064.02 OFFICE SPECIALIST 0161 ACE $17.70 $18.58 $19.51 $20.49 $21.51 $1,415.90 $1,486.69 $1,561.03 $1,639.08 $1,721.03 OFFICE SPECIALIST (HOURLY)0160 UCHR $17.70 $18.58 $19.51 $20.49 $21.51 $1,415.90 $1,486.69 $1,561.03 $1,639.08 $1,721.03 OFFICE SPECIALIST (MYR/@WILL)0162 ACE $17.70 $18.58 $19.51 $20.49 $21.51 $1,415.90 $1,486.69 $1,561.03 $1,639.08 $1,721.03 OFFICE SPECIALIST (MYR/AW/HR)0156 UCHR $17.70 $18.58 $19.51 $20.49 $21.51 $1,415.90 $1,486.69 $1,561.03 $1,639.08 $1,721.03 OPEN SPACE INSPECTOR 6311 ACE $28.71 $30.14 $31.65 $33.23 $34.89 $2,296.47 $2,411.28 $2,531.86 $2,658.44 $2,791.37 OPEN SPACE MANAGER 6302 MM $40.29 $42.31 $44.42 $46.65 $48.98 $3,223.51 $3,384.69 $3,553.92 $3,731.62 $3,918.20 Approved and Adopted: Resolution No.: 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 587 Fiscal Year 2017‐2018 Compensation Schedule Effective September 15, 2017 Position Title PCN BARG Step A Step B Step C Step D Step E Step A Step B Step C Step D Step E Hourly Rate Bi‐Weekly Rate OPS&TELECOM MGR 3025 MM $42.61 $44.74 $46.98 $49.33 $51.80 $3,409.00 $3,579.45 $3,758.42 $3,946.34 $4,143.66 PAINTER 6434 ACE $23.91 $25.11 $26.36 $27.68 $29.06 $1,912.86 $2,008.50 $2,108.92 $2,214.37 $2,325.09 PARK RANGER 7434 UCHR $13.25 $13.91 $14.61 $15.34 $16.10 $1,059.90 $1,112.89 $1,168.53 $1,226.96 $1,288.31 PARK RANGER SUPERVISOR 7441 ACE $30.50 $32.03 $33.63 $35.31 $37.08 $2,440.18 $2,562.19 $2,690.30 $2,824.81 $2,966.05 PARKING ENFORCEMENT OFFICER 5154 ACE $17.89 $18.78 $19.72 $20.71 $21.74 $1,431.08 $1,502.63 $1,577.76 $1,656.65 $1,739.48 PARKING METER TECH (HOURLY)3694 UCHR $19.48 $20.46 $21.48 $22.55 $23.68 $1,558.60 $1,636.53 $1,718.36 $1,804.27 $1,894.49 PARKING METER TECHNICIAN 3693 ACE $19.68 $20.66 $21.69 $22.78 $23.92 $1,574.19 $1,652.90 $1,735.54 $1,822.31 $1,913.43 PARKS MANAGER 6604 MM $40.30 $42.31 $44.43 $46.65 $48.98 $3,223.74 $3,384.92 $3,554.17 $3,731.88 $3,918.47 PARKS OPERATIONS MANAGER 6610 MM $47.26 $49.62 $52.10 $54.71 $57.44 $3,780.66 $3,969.69 $4,168.18 $4,376.59 $4,595.42 PARKS SUPERVISOR 6605 ACE $30.50 $32.03 $33.63 $35.31 $37.08 $2,440.18 $2,562.19 $2,690.30 $2,824.81 $2,966.05 PEACE OFFICER 5061 POA $36.21 $38.02 $39.92 $41.92 $44.02 $2,897.02 $3,041.87 $3,193.97 $3,353.66 $3,521.35 PERFORMANCE & ORG DEV MGR 2758 SM $52.05 ‐‐‐$63.27 $4,164.13 ‐‐‐$5,061.53 PLAN CHECK SUPERVISOR 4731 MM $46.54 $48.87 $51.31 $53.87 $56.57 $3,723.11 $3,909.27 $4,104.73 $4,309.97 $4,525.46 PLAN CHECK TECHNICIAN 4753 ACE $27.46 $28.83 $30.27 $31.79 $33.37 $2,196.62 $2,306.45 $2,421.77 $2,542.86 $2,670.00 PLANNING MANAGER 4727 SM $54.51 ‐‐‐$66.25 $4,360.64 ‐‐‐$5,300.39 PLANNING TECHNICIAN 4527 ACE $22.56 $23.69 $24.87 $26.12 $27.42 $1,804.84 $1,895.08 $1,989.83 $2,089.33 $2,193.79 PLUMBER 6432 ACE $26.30 $27.62 $29.00 $30.45 $31.97 $2,104.13 $2,209.33 $2,319.81 $2,435.80 $2,557.58 POLICE ADMIN SVCS ADMINISTRATO 5025 SM $53.71 ‐‐‐$65.29 $4,296.93 ‐‐‐$5,222.95 POLICE AGENT 5051 POA $39.88 $41.87 $43.96 $46.16 $48.47 $3,190.08 $3,349.59 $3,517.07 $3,692.92 $3,877.56 POLICE CADET 5427 UCHR $11.22 $11.78 $12.37 $12.98 $13.63 $897.24 $942.10 $989.20 $1,038.66 $1,090.60 POLICE CAPTAIN 5022 SM $71.21 ‐‐‐$86.55 $5,696.45 ‐‐‐$6,924.08 POLICE COMM REL SPECIALIST 5258 ACE $23.10 $24.25 $25.47 $26.74 $28.08 $1,847.92 $1,940.31 $2,037.33 $2,139.20 $2,246.16 POLICE COMM SYSTEMS MANAGER 5185 MM $42.62 $44.75 $46.99 $49.33 $51.80 $3,409.38 $3,579.85 $3,758.85 $3,946.79 $4,144.13 POLICE DISPATCHER 5181 ACE $26.56 $27.89 $29.28 $30.75 $32.29 $2,124.99 $2,231.24 $2,342.80 $2,459.95 $2,582.93 POLICE DISPATCHER (HOURLY)5180 UCHR $26.56 $27.89 $29.28 $30.75 $32.29 $2,124.99 $2,231.24 $2,342.80 $2,459.95 $2,582.93 POLICE DISPATCHER SUPERVISOR 5183 ACE $30.55 $32.07 $33.68 $35.36 $37.13 $2,443.74 $2,565.93 $2,694.22 $2,828.93 $2,970.38 POLICE DISPATCHER TRAINEE 5179 ACE $24.15 $25.36 $26.62 $27.95 $29.35 $1,931.81 $2,028.40 $2,129.82 $2,236.31 $2,348.13 POLICE LIEUTENANT 5031 POA $55.05 $57.80 $60.69 $63.72 $66.91 $4,403.80 $4,623.99 $4,855.19 $5,097.95 $5,352.85 POLICE REC & SUPPORT SUPV 5203 ACE $23.41 $24.58 $25.81 $27.10 $28.45 $1,872.56 $1,966.19 $2,064.49 $2,167.71 $2,276.11 POLICE RECORDS SPEC (HOURLY)0166 UCHR $17.70 $18.58 $19.51 $20.49 $21.51 $1,415.92 $1,486.72 $1,561.06 $1,639.11 $1,721.06 POLICE RECORDS SPECIALIST 0165 ACE $17.70 $18.58 $19.51 $20.49 $21.51 $1,415.92 $1,486.72 $1,561.06 $1,639.11 $1,721.06 POLICE RECRUIT 5071 ACE $28.64 $30.07 ‐‐‐$2,291.26 $2,405.82 ‐‐‐ POLICE SERGEANT 5041 POA $45.87 $48.16 $50.57 $53.10 $55.75 $3,669.55 $3,853.03 $4,045.68 $4,247.96 $4,460.36 POLICE SERVICES OFF (HOURLY)5133 UCHR $23.81 $25.00 $26.25 $27.56 $28.94 $1,904.76 $1,999.99 $2,099.99 $2,204.99 $2,315.24 POLICE SERVICES OFFICER 5131 ACE $23.81 $25.00 $26.25 $27.56 $28.94 $1,904.76 $1,999.99 $2,099.99 $2,204.99 $2,315.24 POLICE SERVICES TECHNICIAN 5415 ACE $22.72 $23.85 $25.04 $26.30 $27.61 $1,817.21 $1,908.07 $2,003.48 $2,103.65 $2,208.83 POLICE SUPPORT SERVICES MGR 5205 MM $41.25 $43.31 $45.48 $47.75 $50.14 $3,299.93 $3,464.93 $3,638.18 $3,820.08 $4,011.09 POLICE SVCS OFFICER SUPERVISOR 5132 ACE $27.38 $28.75 $30.19 $31.70 $33.28 $2,190.46 $2,299.98 $2,414.98 $2,535.74 $2,662.52 POLICE SVCS TECH (HOURLY)5416 UCHR $22.72 $23.85 $25.04 $26.30 $27.61 $1,817.21 $1,908.07 $2,003.48 $2,103.65 $2,208.83 POLICE TECH SPECIALIST (HRLY)5108 UCHR $35.91 $37.71 $39.59 $41.57 $43.65 $2,872.87 $3,016.52 $3,167.34 $3,325.71 $3,491.99 POLICE TECHNOLOGY MANAGER 5209 MM $42.61 $44.74 $46.98 $49.33 $51.80 $3,409.01 $3,579.46 $3,758.43 $3,946.35 $4,143.67 POLICE TECHNOLOGY SPECIALIST 5107 ACE $35.91 $37.71 $39.59 $41.57 $43.65 $2,872.87 $3,016.52 $3,167.34 $3,325.71 $3,491.99 POLICY AIDE 2013 PRUC $26.75 $28.09 $29.49 $30.96 $32.51 $2,139.85 $2,246.84 $2,359.18 $2,477.14 $2,601.00 PRINCIPAL CIVIL ENGINEER 6021 MM $51.09 $53.64 $56.32 $59.14 $62.09 $4,086.82 $4,291.16 $4,505.72 $4,731.00 $4,967.55 PRINCIPAL ECONOMIC DEV SPEC 2724 PROF $47.50 $49.88 $52.37 $54.99 $57.74 $3,800.10 $3,990.10 $4,189.60 $4,399.09 $4,619.04 PRINCIPAL HR ANALYST 3305 MMCF $44.05 $46.25 $48.57 $50.99 $53.54 $3,524.04 $3,700.24 $3,885.25 $4,079.51 $4,283.49 PRINCIPAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 4486 MM $47.50 $49.88 $52.37 $54.99 $57.74 $3,800.10 $3,990.10 $4,189.60 $4,399.09 $4,619.04 PRINCIPAL LIBRARIAN 7051 MM $41.31 $43.37 $45.54 $47.82 $50.21 $3,304.68 $3,469.92 $3,643.41 $3,825.58 $4,016.86 PRINCIPAL MANAGEMENT ANALYST 0208 PROF $39.44 $41.41 $43.48 $45.65 $47.94 $3,154.99 $3,312.73 $3,478.37 $3,652.29 $3,834.90 PRINCIPAL MGMT ANALYST (CONF)0214 PRCF $39.44 $41.41 $43.48 $45.65 $47.94 $3,154.99 $3,312.73 $3,478.37 $3,652.29 $3,834.90 PRINCIPAL PLANNER 4431 MM $47.50 $49.88 $52.37 $54.99 $57.74 $3,800.10 $3,990.10 $4,189.60 $4,399.09 $4,619.04 PRINCIPAL PROJECT COORDINATOR 4212 PROF $47.50 $49.88 $52.37 $54.99 $57.74 $3,800.10 $3,990.10 $4,189.60 $4,399.09 $4,619.04 PRINCIPAL RECREATION MANAGER 7410 MM $40.30 $42.31 $44.43 $46.65 $48.98 $3,223.72 $3,384.91 $3,554.15 $3,731.86 $3,918.45 PRINCIPAL TRAFFIC ENGINEER 6020 MM $51.09 $53.64 $56.32 $59.14 $62.09 $4,086.82 $4,291.16 $4,505.72 $4,731.00 $4,967.55 PROCUREMENT SERVICES ANALYST 3717 MM $38.39 $40.31 $42.33 $44.45 $46.67 $3,071.53 $3,225.10 $3,386.36 $3,555.68 $3,733.46 PROCUREMENT SPECIALIST 3721 ACE $27.91 $29.31 $30.77 $32.31 $33.93 $2,232.83 $2,344.46 $2,461.68 $2,584.77 $2,714.01 PROGRAMMER ANALYST 3090 PROF $34.52 $36.25 $38.06 $39.96 $41.96 $2,761.83 $2,899.92 $3,044.92 $3,197.17 $3,357.02 PROJECT COORDINATOR I 4217 ACE $29.64 $31.13 $32.68 $34.32 $36.03 $2,371.51 $2,490.08 $2,614.59 $2,745.31 $2,882.58 PROJECT COORDINATOR I (HRLY)4218 UCHR $29.64 $31.13 $32.68 $34.32 $36.03 $2,371.51 $2,490.08 $2,614.59 $2,745.31 $2,882.58 PROJECT COORDINATOR II 4215 ACE $32.61 $34.24 $35.95 $37.75 $39.64 $2,608.66 $2,739.09 $2,876.05 $3,019.85 $3,170.84 PROJECT COORDINATOR II (HRLY)4216 UCHR $32.61 $34.24 $35.95 $37.75 $39.64 $2,608.66 $2,739.09 $2,876.05 $3,019.85 $3,170.84 PROPERTY & EVIDENCE SPECIALIST 5127 ACE $19.68 $20.66 $21.69 $22.78 $23.92 $1,574.19 $1,652.90 $1,735.54 $1,822.31 $1,913.43 PUB WORKS SPECIALIST 6712 ACE $22.88 $24.03 $25.23 $26.49 $27.81 $1,830.51 $1,922.03 $2,018.13 $2,119.04 $2,225.00 PUBLIC INFORMATION SPECIALIST 2782 CONF $28.10 $29.50 $30.98 $32.52 $34.15 $2,247.69 $2,360.09 $2,478.09 $2,601.99 $2,732.09 PUBLIC SAFETY ANALYST 5254 ACE $30.75 $32.28 $33.90 $35.59 $37.37 $2,459.60 $2,582.58 $2,711.71 $2,847.30 $2,989.66 Approved and Adopted: Resolution No.: 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 588 Fiscal Year 2017‐2018 Compensation Schedule Effective September 15, 2017 Position Title PCN BARG Step A Step B Step C Step D Step E Step A Step B Step C Step D Step E Hourly Rate Bi‐Weekly Rate PUBLIC SAFETY ANALYST (HRLY)5256 UCHR $30.75 $32.28 $33.90 $35.59 $37.37 $2,459.60 $2,582.58 $2,711.71 $2,847.30 $2,989.66 PUBLIC WORKS INSP I 6123 ACE $28.71 $30.14 $31.65 $33.23 $34.89 $2,296.47 $2,411.28 $2,531.86 $2,658.44 $2,791.37 PUBLIC WORKS INSP II 6121 ACE $31.58 $33.16 $34.81 $36.55 $38.38 $2,526.11 $2,652.41 $2,785.03 $2,924.28 $3,070.50 PUBLIC WORKS MANAGER 6336 MM $40.29 $42.31 $44.42 $46.65 $48.98 $3,223.51 $3,384.69 $3,553.92 $3,731.62 $3,918.20 PUBLIC WORKS SUPERVISOR 6337 ACE $30.50 $32.03 $33.63 $35.31 $37.08 $2,440.18 $2,562.19 $2,690.30 $2,824.81 $2,966.05 PUMP MAINT TECHNICIAN 6396 ACE $26.06 $27.36 $28.73 $30.17 $31.67 $2,084.65 $2,188.89 $2,298.34 $2,413.24 $2,533.91 PUMP MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR 6392 ACE $30.54 $32.06 $33.67 $35.35 $37.12 $2,443.01 $2,565.16 $2,693.42 $2,828.08 $2,969.49 PURCHASING AGENT 3711 SM $48.26 ‐‐‐$58.66 $3,860.93 ‐‐‐$4,692.99 RANGE MASTER 5417 ACE $21.65 $22.73 $23.86 $25.06 $26.31 $1,731.60 $1,818.18 $1,909.09 $2,004.55 $2,104.77 RANGE MASTER (HOURLY)5418 UCHR $21.01 $22.06 $23.16 $24.32 $25.54 $1,680.84 $1,764.88 $1,853.12 $1,945.78 $2,043.07 RCFL NETWORK ENGINEER 5450 UCHR $31.93 $33.53 $35.20 $36.96 $38.81 $2,554.37 $2,682.08 $2,816.19 $2,956.99 $3,104.84 REAL PROPERTY MANAGER 6037 MMUC $44.23 $46.44 $48.76 $51.20 $53.76 $3,538.49 $3,715.41 $3,901.18 $4,096.24 $4,301.05 REC AIDE 7605 UCHR ‐$10.50 $11.03 $11.58 $12.16 ‐$840.34 $882.36 $926.48 $972.80 REC SPECIALIST 7601 UCHR $15.80 $16.59 $17.42 $18.30 $19.21 $1,264.33 $1,327.55 $1,393.92 $1,463.62 $1,536.80 REC SUPERVISOR I (HOURLY)7426 UCHR $22.98 $24.13 $25.33 $26.60 $27.93 $1,838.30 $1,930.21 $2,026.73 $2,128.06 $2,234.46 RECORDS MANAGER 2211 MM $32.85 $34.49 $36.21 $38.03 $39.93 $2,627.84 $2,759.23 $2,897.19 $3,042.05 $3,194.15 RECORDS SPECIALIST 2217 ACE $19.47 $20.44 $21.46 $22.54 $23.66 $1,557.51 $1,635.39 $1,717.16 $1,803.02 $1,893.16 RECREATION LEADER I 7609 UCHR $11.45 $12.02 $12.63 $13.26 $13.92 $916.16 $961.97 $1,010.07 $1,060.57 $1,113.60 RECREATION LEADER II 7607 UCHR $13.17 $13.83 $14.52 $15.25 $16.01 $1,053.72 $1,106.40 $1,161.72 $1,219.81 $1,280.80 RECREATION SUPERVISOR I 7425 ACE $22.98 $24.13 $25.33 $26.60 $27.93 $1,838.30 $1,930.21 $2,026.73 $2,128.06 $2,234.46 RECREATION SUPERVISOR II 7423 ACE $25.28 $26.54 $27.87 $29.26 $30.72 $2,022.13 $2,123.24 $2,229.40 $2,340.87 $2,457.92 RECREATION SUPERVISOR III 7422 ACE $29.07 $30.52 $32.05 $33.65 $35.33 $2,325.46 $2,441.74 $2,563.82 $2,692.01 $2,826.62 RECYCLING SPECIALIST I 2742 ACE $22.67 $23.80 $24.99 $26.24 $27.55 $1,813.38 $1,904.05 $1,999.25 $2,099.21 $2,204.17 RECYCLING SPECIALIST II 2744 ACE $24.93 $26.18 $27.49 $28.86 $30.31 $1,994.72 $2,094.46 $2,199.18 $2,309.14 $2,424.60 REGISTERED VET TECH (HOURLY)5312 UCHR $21.65 $22.73 $23.86 $25.06 $26.31 $1,731.60 $1,818.18 $1,909.09 $2,004.55 $2,104.77 REGISTERED VETERINARY TECH 5307 ACE $21.65 $22.73 $23.86 $25.06 $26.31 $1,731.60 $1,818.18 $1,909.09 $2,004.55 $2,104.77 RESERVE OFFICER 5081 UCHR $14.24 $14.95 $15.69 ‐‐$1,139.42 $1,195.85 $1,255.53 ‐‐ RET ANNT ‐ HOMELESS OUTREACH 9901 UCHR $37.77 $39.66 $41.64 $43.72 $45.91 $3,021.63 $3,172.71 $3,331.35 $3,497.91 $3,672.81 RISK MANAGEMENT SPECIALIST 3367 PRCF $33.16 $34.82 $36.56 $38.39 $40.31 $2,653.01 $2,785.66 $2,924.94 $3,071.19 $3,224.75 RISK MANAGER 3361 SM $50.26 ‐‐‐$61.10 $4,021.17 ‐‐‐$4,887.76 SCHOOL CROSSING GUARD 5143 UCHR $10.05 $10.55 $11.08 $11.64 $12.22 $804.19 $844.39 $886.62 $930.94 $977.49 SEASONAL ASSISTANT 0231 UCHR $9.55 $10.03 $10.53 $11.06 $11.61 $764.21 $802.42 $842.54 $884.67 $928.90 SECRETARY 0171 ACE $19.47 $20.44 $21.46 $22.54 $23.66 $1,557.51 $1,635.39 $1,717.16 $1,803.02 $1,893.16 SECRETARY (HOURLY)0152 UCHR $19.47 $20.44 $21.46 $22.54 $23.66 $1,557.51 $1,635.39 $1,717.16 $1,803.02 $1,893.16 SIGNAL SYSTEMS ENGINEER I 6169 ACE $33.00 $34.65 $36.38 $38.20 $40.11 $2,640.13 $2,772.14 $2,910.74 $3,056.28 $3,209.09 SIGNAL SYSTEMS ENGINEER II 6170 ACE $36.30 $38.12 $40.02 $42.02 $44.13 $2,904.14 $3,049.35 $3,201.81 $3,361.91 $3,530.00 SIGNING&STRIPING SUPERVISOR 6355 ACE $30.50 $32.03 $33.63 $35.31 $37.08 $2,440.18 $2,562.19 $2,690.30 $2,824.81 $2,966.05 SPECIAL EVENTS COORDINATOR 2799 PRUC $37.90 $39.80 $41.79 $43.88 $46.07 $3,032.12 $3,183.72 $3,342.91 $3,510.05 $3,685.56 SR ACCOUNTANT 3630 MMCF $40.40 $42.42 $44.54 $46.77 $49.10 $3,231.85 $3,393.44 $3,563.12 $3,741.27 $3,928.34 SR ACCOUNTING ASST 3651 ACE $23.13 $24.29 $25.50 $26.78 $28.12 $1,850.69 $1,943.23 $2,040.39 $2,142.41 $2,249.53 SR ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY 0185 ACE $27.35 $28.71 $30.15 $31.66 $33.24 $2,187.62 $2,296.99 $2,411.85 $2,532.43 $2,659.06 SR ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY 0145 CONF $27.35 $28.71 $30.15 $31.66 $33.24 $2,187.62 $2,296.99 $2,411.85 $2,532.43 $2,659.06 SR ANIMAL CARE SPECIALIST 5345 ACE $20.74 $21.78 $22.87 $24.01 $25.21 $1,659.44 $1,742.41 $1,829.53 $1,921.01 $2,017.06 SR APPLICATIONS SUPPORT SPEC 3089 PROF $38.36 $40.28 $42.29 $44.41 $46.63 $3,068.70 $3,222.14 $3,383.25 $3,552.41 $3,730.03 SR ASST CITY ATTORNEY 2403 EXEC $75.81 ‐‐‐$92.15 $6,064.89 ‐‐‐$7,371.92 SR BUILDING INSPECTOR 4781 ACE $36.31 $38.13 $40.03 $42.04 $44.14 $2,905.01 $3,050.26 $3,202.78 $3,362.92 $3,531.06 SR BUSINESS LICENSE REP 4507 ACE $23.13 $24.29 $25.50 $26.78 $28.12 $1,850.69 $1,943.23 $2,040.39 $2,142.41 $2,249.53 SR CIVIL ENGINEER 6019 WCE $46.46 $48.78 $51.22 $53.78 $56.47 $3,716.83 $3,902.67 $4,097.80 $4,302.69 $4,517.83 SR CODE ENF OFF (HOURLY)4764 UCHR $34.70 $36.43 $38.25 $40.16 $42.17 $2,775.65 $2,914.44 $3,060.16 $3,213.16 $3,373.82 SR CODE ENFORCEMENT OFF 4763 ACE $34.70 $36.43 $38.25 $40.16 $42.17 $2,775.65 $2,914.44 $3,060.16 $3,213.16 $3,373.82 SR CONSERVATION SPECIALIST 6204 ACE $28.67 $30.11 $31.61 $33.19 $34.85 $2,293.94 $2,408.64 $2,529.07 $2,655.52 $2,788.30 SR COUNCIL ASST 2027 CONF $21.35 $22.41 $23.53 $24.71 $25.95 $1,707.63 $1,793.00 $1,882.65 $1,976.78 $2,075.63 SR COUNCIL ASST 2025 UCHR $25.71 $26.99 $28.34 $29.76 $31.25 $2,056.67 $2,159.51 $2,267.48 $2,380.85 $2,499.90 SR DEPUTY CITY CLERK 2208 PRUC $32.82 $34.46 $36.18 $37.99 $39.89 $2,625.55 $2,756.83 $2,894.67 $3,039.41 $3,191.38 SR ECONOMIC DEV SPEC 2725 PROF $38.00 $39.90 $41.89 $43.99 $46.19 $3,039.79 $3,191.78 $3,351.37 $3,518.94 $3,694.89 SR ELECTRICIAN 6442 ACE $30.25 $31.76 $33.35 $35.01 $36.77 $2,419.76 $2,540.75 $2,667.78 $2,801.17 $2,941.23 SR ELECTRONICS TECHNICIAN 6471 ACE $33.27 $34.94 $36.68 $38.52 $40.44 $2,661.79 $2,794.88 $2,934.63 $3,081.36 $3,235.42 SR ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN 6059 ACE $31.58 $33.16 $34.81 $36.55 $38.38 $2,526.11 $2,652.41 $2,785.03 $2,924.28 $3,070.50 SR EQUIPMENT MECHANIC 6512 ACE $28.54 $29.97 $31.47 $33.04 $34.69 $2,283.41 $2,397.58 $2,517.46 $2,643.32 $2,775.49 SR FIRE INSP/INVEST 5529 IAFF $37.40 $39.27 $41.23 $43.29 $45.46 $2,991.95 $3,141.55 $3,298.63 $3,463.57 $3,636.74 SR FISCAL OFF SPEC (HRLY)0176 UCHR $20.44 $21.46 $22.54 $23.66 $24.85 $1,635.38 $1,717.15 $1,803.01 $1,893.16 $1,987.82 SR FISCAL OFFICE SPECIALIST 0175 ACE $20.44 $21.46 $22.54 $23.66 $24.85 $1,635.38 $1,717.15 $1,803.01 $1,893.16 $1,987.82 SR FISCAL OFFICE SPECIALIST 0141 CONF $20.44 $21.46 $22.54 $23.66 $24.85 $1,635.38 $1,717.15 $1,803.01 $1,893.16 $1,987.82 SR GARDENER 6621 ACE $24.01 $25.22 $26.48 $27.80 $29.19 $1,921.15 $2,017.21 $2,118.07 $2,223.98 $2,335.17 SR GIS SPECIALIST 3080 ACE $32.65 $34.28 $35.99 $37.79 $39.68 $2,611.71 $2,742.30 $2,879.41 $3,023.38 $3,174.55 Approved and Adopted: Resolution No.: 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 589 Fiscal Year 2017‐2018 Compensation Schedule Effective September 15, 2017 Position Title PCN BARG Step A Step B Step C Step D Step E Step A Step B Step C Step D Step E Hourly Rate Bi‐Weekly Rate SR GRAPHIC DESIGNER 2764 PROF $34.34 $36.06 $37.86 $39.76 $41.74 $2,747.38 $2,884.75 $3,028.99 $3,180.44 $3,339.46 SR HR ANALYST 3308 PRCF $38.14 $40.05 $42.05 $44.15 $46.36 $3,051.10 $3,203.65 $3,363.84 $3,532.03 $3,708.63 SR HUMAN RESOURCES TECHNICIAN 3316 CONF $27.16 $28.52 $29.95 $31.44 $33.02 $2,172.93 $2,281.58 $2,395.66 $2,515.45 $2,641.22 SR HVAC TECHNICIAN 6441 ACE $30.25 $31.76 $33.35 $35.01 $36.77 $2,419.76 $2,540.75 $2,667.78 $2,801.17 $2,941.23 SR INFO TECH SUPPORT SPEC 3012 PROF $38.36 $40.28 $42.29 $44.41 $46.63 $3,068.70 $3,222.14 $3,383.25 $3,552.41 $3,730.03 SR LAND SURVEYOR 6285 WCE $46.46 $48.78 $51.22 $53.78 $56.47 $3,716.83 $3,902.67 $4,097.80 $4,302.69 $4,517.83 SR LANDSCAPE INSPECTOR 6295 ACE $33.01 $34.66 $36.40 $38.21 $40.13 $2,640.93 $2,772.98 $2,911.62 $3,057.20 $3,210.06 SR LATENT PRINT EXAMINER 5110 ACE $38.98 $40.92 $42.97 $45.12 $47.38 $3,118.08 $3,273.99 $3,437.69 $3,609.57 $3,790.05 SR LEGAL ASSISTANT 2463 CONF $27.62 $29.00 $30.45 $31.97 $33.57 $2,209.27 $2,319.74 $2,435.73 $2,557.51 $2,685.39 SR LIBRARIAN 7053 MM $32.80 $34.44 $36.16 $37.97 $39.87 $2,623.98 $2,755.18 $2,892.94 $3,037.59 $3,189.47 SR LIFEGUARD 7589 UCHR $16.72 $17.55 $18.43 $19.35 $20.32 $1,337.40 $1,404.27 $1,474.48 $1,548.21 $1,625.62 SR MAINTENANCE WORKER 6371 ACE $24.01 $25.22 $26.48 $27.80 $29.19 $1,921.15 $2,017.21 $2,118.07 $2,223.98 $2,335.17 SR MANAGEMENT ANALYST 0206 PROF $35.85 $37.64 $39.53 $41.50 $43.58 $2,868.15 $3,011.56 $3,162.14 $3,320.25 $3,486.26 SR OFFICE SPECIALIST 0173 ACE $19.47 $20.44 $21.46 $22.54 $23.66 $1,557.51 $1,635.39 $1,717.16 $1,803.02 $1,893.16 SR OFFICE SPECIALIST (HOURLY)0174 UCHR $19.47 $20.44 $21.46 $22.54 $23.66 $1,557.51 $1,635.39 $1,717.16 $1,803.02 $1,893.16 SR OPEN SPACE INSPECTOR 6309 ACE $33.01 $34.66 $36.40 $38.22 $40.13 $2,640.94 $2,772.99 $2,911.63 $3,057.21 $3,210.07 SR PARK RANGER 7439 ACE $24.01 $25.22 $26.48 $27.80 $29.19 $1,921.15 $2,017.21 $2,118.07 $2,223.98 $2,335.17 SR PLAN CHECK ENGINEER 4746 WCE $44.44 $46.66 $49.00 $51.45 $54.02 $3,555.24 $3,733.00 $3,919.65 $4,115.63 $4,321.41 SR PLAN CHECK TECHNICIAN 4751 ACE $31.58 $33.16 $34.81 $36.55 $38.38 $2,526.11 $2,652.41 $2,785.03 $2,924.28 $3,070.50 SR PLANNER 4432 PROF $38.00 $39.90 $41.89 $43.99 $46.19 $3,039.79 $3,191.78 $3,351.37 $3,518.94 $3,694.89 SR PLANNING TECHNICIAN 4529 ACE $25.94 $27.24 $28.60 $30.03 $31.54 $2,075.56 $2,179.34 $2,288.31 $2,402.72 $2,522.86 SR POLICE RECORDS SPECIALIST 0135 ACE $20.35 $21.37 $22.44 $23.56 $24.74 $1,628.32 $1,709.74 $1,795.22 $1,884.98 $1,979.23 SR POLICE TECHNOLOGY SPEC 5109 PROF $41.71 $43.79 $45.98 $48.28 $50.69 $3,336.52 $3,503.35 $3,678.51 $3,862.44 $4,055.56 SR PROCUREMENT SPECIALIST 3728 PROF $31.17 $32.73 $34.36 $36.08 $37.88 $2,493.44 $2,618.11 $2,749.01 $2,886.46 $3,030.79 SR PROGRAMMER ANALYST 3091 PROF $39.48 $41.45 $43.52 $45.70 $47.98 $3,158.03 $3,315.93 $3,481.73 $3,655.82 $3,838.61 SR PROJECT COORDINATOR 4214 PROF $38.00 $39.90 $41.89 $43.99 $46.19 $3,039.79 $3,191.78 $3,351.37 $3,518.94 $3,694.89 SR PROP & EVIDENCE SPECIALIST 5125 ACE $22.63 $23.76 $24.95 $26.20 $27.51 $1,810.31 $1,900.83 $1,995.87 $2,095.66 $2,200.45 SR PUBLIC SAFETY ANALYST 5260 PROF $34.33 $36.05 $37.85 $39.75 $41.73 $2,746.69 $2,884.02 $3,028.22 $3,179.63 $3,338.61 SR PUBLIC WORKS INSP 6101 ACE $36.31 $38.13 $40.03 $42.04 $44.14 $2,905.02 $3,050.27 $3,202.79 $3,362.93 $3,531.07 SR PUBLIC WORKS SPECIALIST 6702 ACE $27.46 $28.83 $30.27 $31.79 $33.37 $2,196.61 $2,306.44 $2,421.76 $2,542.85 $2,669.99 SR RECORDS SPECIALIST 2215 ACE $22.39 $23.51 $24.68 $25.92 $27.21 $1,791.14 $1,880.70 $1,974.73 $2,073.47 $2,177.15 SR RECREATION MGR 7421 MM $33.11 $34.76 $36.50 $38.32 $40.24 $2,648.52 $2,780.95 $2,919.99 $3,065.99 $3,219.29 SR RECYCLING SPECIALIST 2746 ACE $28.67 $30.11 $31.61 $33.19 $34.85 $2,293.94 $2,408.64 $2,529.07 $2,655.52 $2,788.30 SR RISK MANAGEMENT SPECIALIST 3365 PRCF $38.14 $40.05 $42.05 $44.15 $46.36 $3,051.10 $3,203.65 $3,363.84 $3,532.03 $3,708.63 SR SECRETARY 0177 ACE $21.42 $22.49 $23.61 $24.79 $26.03 $1,713.26 $1,798.93 $1,888.88 $1,983.32 $2,082.49 SR SECRETARY 0139 CONF $21.42 $22.49 $23.61 $24.79 $26.03 $1,713.26 $1,798.93 $1,888.88 $1,983.32 $2,082.49 SR SECRETARY (HOURLY)0178 UCHR $21.42 $22.49 $23.61 $24.79 $26.03 $1,713.26 $1,798.93 $1,888.88 $1,983.32 $2,082.49 SR TREE TRIMMER 6573 ACE $26.42 $27.74 $29.12 $30.58 $32.11 $2,113.26 $2,218.92 $2,329.87 $2,446.36 $2,568.68 SR WEBMASTER 2779 PROF $34.47 $36.19 $38.00 $39.90 $41.90 $2,757.45 $2,895.32 $3,040.09 $3,192.09 $3,351.70 STOREKEEPER 3734 ACE $20.01 $21.01 $22.06 $23.17 $24.32 $1,600.96 $1,681.00 $1,765.06 $1,853.31 $1,945.98 STOREKEEPER SUPERVISOR 3732 ACE $24.01 $25.22 $26.48 $27.80 $29.19 $1,921.15 $2,017.21 $2,118.07 $2,223.98 $2,335.17 STORMWTR COMPLNCE INSP I 6127 ACE $26.10 $27.40 $28.77 $30.21 $31.72 $2,087.69 $2,192.07 $2,301.68 $2,416.76 $2,537.59 STORMWTR COMPLNCE INSP II 6125 ACE $28.71 $30.14 $31.65 $33.23 $34.89 $2,296.47 $2,411.28 $2,531.86 $2,658.44 $2,791.37 SUPV PUBLIC SAFETY ANALYST 5241 MM $39.48 $41.46 $43.53 $45.71 $47.99 $3,158.69 $3,316.62 $3,482.45 $3,656.57 $3,839.40 SURVEY TECHNICIAN I 6151 ACE $24.96 $26.21 $27.52 $28.90 $30.34 $1,996.92 $2,096.76 $2,201.60 $2,311.68 $2,427.26 SURVEY TECHNICIAN II 6141 ACE $27.46 $28.83 $30.27 $31.79 $33.37 $2,196.61 $2,306.44 $2,421.76 $2,542.85 $2,669.99 SYSTEMS/DATABASE ADMINISTRATR 3015 PROF $38.36 $40.27 $42.29 $44.40 $46.62 $3,068.45 $3,221.87 $3,382.97 $3,552.12 $3,729.72 TELECOMMUNICATIONS SPECIALIST 3027 ACE $23.10 $24.26 $25.47 $26.74 $28.08 $1,848.09 $1,940.49 $2,037.51 $2,139.39 $2,246.36 TINY TOT AIDE 7503 UCHR $13.17 $13.83 $14.52 $15.25 $16.01 $1,053.72 $1,106.40 $1,161.72 $1,219.81 $1,280.80 TINY TOT SPECIALIST 7505 UCHR $15.80 $16.59 $17.42 $18.30 $19.21 $1,264.33 $1,327.55 $1,393.92 $1,463.62 $1,536.80 TRAFFIC CONTROL ASSISTANT 5155 UCHR ‐‐‐‐$15.69 ‐‐‐‐$1,255.20 TRAFFIC DEVICES TECH 6177 ACE $28.93 $30.38 $31.90 $33.49 $35.17 $2,314.61 $2,430.33 $2,551.85 $2,679.44 $2,813.42 TRAFFIC DEVICES TECH SUPV 6175 ACE $33.27 $34.94 $36.68 $38.52 $40.44 $2,661.79 $2,794.88 $2,934.63 $3,081.36 $3,235.42 TRAFFIC ENGINEER 6024 PROF $39.66 $41.64 $43.72 $45.91 $48.20 $3,172.44 $3,331.06 $3,497.61 $3,672.50 $3,856.12 TRAFFIC OFFICER (HOURLY)5293 UCHR $14.24 $14.95 $15.69 ‐‐$1,139.42 $1,195.84 $1,255.53 ‐‐ TRAINING PROGRAM SPEC (HRLY)5250 UCHR $23.10 $24.25 $25.47 $26.74 $28.08 $1,847.92 $1,940.31 $2,037.33 $2,139.20 $2,246.16 TRAINING PROGRAMS SPECIALIST 5262 ACE $23.10 $24.25 $25.47 $26.74 $28.08 $1,847.92 $1,940.31 $2,037.33 $2,139.20 $2,246.16 TRANS ENGINEER W/ CERT 6031 WCE $46.46 $48.78 $51.22 $53.78 $56.47 $3,716.83 $3,902.67 $4,097.80 $4,302.69 $4,517.83 TRANS ENGINEER W/O CERT 6033 WCE $44.25 $46.46 $48.78 $51.22 $53.78 $3,539.84 $3,716.83 $3,902.67 $4,097.80 $4,302.69 TREE TRIMMER 6575 ACE $22.01 $23.11 $24.27 $25.48 $26.76 $1,761.06 $1,849.11 $1,941.56 $2,038.63 $2,140.57 TREE TRIMMER SUPERVISOR 6572 ACE $30.38 $31.90 $33.49 $35.17 $36.92 $2,430.26 $2,551.78 $2,679.36 $2,813.32 $2,954.00 VETERINARIAN (HOURLY)5308 UCHR $46.77 $49.11 $51.57 $54.15 $56.85 $3,741.96 $3,929.06 $4,125.51 $4,331.78 $4,548.37 VETERINARIAN (PERMITTED)5331 PROF $54.82 $57.56 $60.43 $63.46 $66.63 $4,385.24 $4,604.50 $4,834.73 $5,076.46 $5,330.29 VETERINARIAN I 5335 PROF $38.93 $40.88 $42.92 $45.07 $47.32 $3,114.51 $3,270.24 $3,433.75 $3,605.44 $3,785.71 VETERINARIAN II 5333 PROF $44.77 $47.01 $49.36 $51.83 $54.42 $3,581.69 $3,760.77 $3,948.81 $4,146.25 $4,353.56 Approved and Adopted: Resolution No.: 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 590 Fiscal Year 2017‐2018 Compensation Schedule Effective September 15, 2017 Position Title PCN BARG Step A Step B Step C Step D Step E Step A Step B Step C Step D Step E Hourly Rate Bi‐Weekly Rate VETERINARIAN‐PERMITTED 5322 UCHR $66.13 $69.44 $72.91 $76.56 $80.39 $5,290.73 $5,555.27 $5,833.03 $6,124.68 $6,430.92 VETERINARY ASSISTANT 5325 ACE $18.04 $18.94 $19.89 $20.88 $21.92 $1,443.00 $1,515.15 $1,590.91 $1,670.46 $1,753.98 VETERINARY ASSISTANT (HOURLY)5323 UCHR $18.04 $18.94 $19.89 $20.88 $21.92 $1,443.00 $1,515.15 $1,590.91 $1,670.46 $1,753.98 VOLUNTEER COORD (DEPT)7131 ACE $19.72 $20.70 $21.74 $22.83 $23.97 $1,577.43 $1,656.30 $1,739.12 $1,826.07 $1,917.37 VOLUNTEER COORD (DEPT)(HOURLY) 7132 UCHR $19.72 $20.70 $21.74 $22.83 $23.97 $1,577.43 $1,656.30 $1,739.12 $1,826.07 $1,917.37 WASTEWATER/STRMWTR OPS MANAGER 6332 MM $46.34 $48.65 $51.09 $53.64 $56.32 $3,707.04 $3,892.39 $4,087.01 $4,291.36 $4,505.93 WEBMASTER 2777 ACE $29.68 $31.16 $32.72 $34.36 $36.07 $2,374.28 $2,492.99 $2,617.65 $2,748.52 $2,885.95 WEBMASTER (HOURLY)2790 UCHR $29.68 $31.16 $32.72 $34.36 $36.07 $2,374.28 $2,492.99 $2,617.65 $2,748.52 $2,885.95 Revised July 11, 2017 (Effective July 7, 2017) September 12, 2017 (Effective September 15, 2017) Approved and Adopted: Resolution No.: 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 591 RESOLUTION NO. __________ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING THE COMPENSATION SCHEDULE AND CLASSIFICATION PLAN TO REFLECT THE ADDITION OF VARIOUS POSITION TITLES AND AMENDING THE AUTHORIZED POSITION COUNT IN VARIOUS DEPARTMENTS WITH A NET DECREASE IN AUTHORIZED STAFFING WHEREAS, Civil Service Rule 1.02(A), which applies to the City’s classified positions, provides for necessary reviews and changes so that the City’s classification plan is kept current, and that changes in existing classes, the establishment of new classes, or the abolition of classes are properly reflected in the classification plan; and WHEREAS, in an effort to address the needs of various departments and the City's workforce, the Human Resources Department is proposing the reclassification of certain positions and the addition of two new classifications; and WHEREAS, a summary of the proposed new classifications and the E-Step salary is as follows: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, that it approves the amendments to the Compensation Schedule and Classification Plan to reflect the changes described above. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 592 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, that it approves the following changes to the fiscal year 2017 and fiscal year 2018 authorized position count with a net decrease in authorized staffing: Presented by Approved as to form by Courtney Chase Glen R. Googins Director of Human Resources City Attorney 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 593 RESOLUTION NO. __________ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE AMENDED COMPENSATION SUMMARY FOR UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEES WHEREAS, the City has set forth the compensation for all unrepresented employees and elected officials as set forth in a Compensation Summary via prior resolution; and WHEREAS, benefited employees, with exception of employees represented by the Chula Vista Police Officers’ Association and International Association of Fire Fighters, are provided an annual allotment to use toward the purchase of benefits available under the City’s Cafeteria Benefits Plan (Flex Plan); and WHEREAS, any Flex Plan allotment remaining after electing medical, dental, vision and/or Flexible Spending Account coverage may be allotted to a taxable Cash Payment Option; and WHEREAS, the City desires to amend the Compensation Summary for all unrepresented employees and elected officials ("Amended Compensation Summary") to reflect a reduction in the maximum taxable Cash Payment Option for Elected Officials, Executive and Senior Managers to help address the City’s 10-year financial forecast; and WHEREAS, Elected Officials’ and Executive Managers’ maximum cash payment option will be reduced to the following: $12,000 for Calendar Year 2018 $10,000 for Calendar Year 2019 $8,000 for Calendar Year 2020; and WHEREAS, Senior Managers’ maximum cash payment option will be reduced to the following: $11,000 for Calendar Year 2018 $9,000 for Calendar Year 2019 $7,000 for Calendar Year 2020. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, that it hereby does approve the Amended Compensation Summary (as set forth above and a copy of which is on file in the City Clerk’s Office), and it shall continue in full force and effect until subsequent amendment by City Council. Presented by Approved as to form by Courtney Chase Glen R. Googins Director of Human Resources City Attorney 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 594 RESOLUTION NO. __________ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE REVISED FISCAL YEAR 2017-2018 COMPENSATION SCHEDULE EFFECTIVE SEPTEMBER 15, 2017, AS REQUIRED BY CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, TITLE 2, SECTION 570.5 TO REFLECT THE ADDITION OF BUILDING SERVICES SUPERVISOR AND PRINCIPAL TRAFFIC ENGINEER POSITION TITLES WHEREAS, California Code of Regulations, Title 2, Section 570.5 requires that, for purposes of determining a retiring employee's pension allowance, the pay rate be limited to the amount listed on a pay schedule that meets certain requirements and be approved by the governing body in accordance with the requirements of the applicable public meeting laws; and WHEREAS, the revised Fiscal Year 2017-2018 Compensation Schedule ("Compensation Schedule") was last approved by the City Council at their meeting of July 11, 2017; and WHEREAS, any changes including but not limited to, across-the-board increases, classification changes and salary adjustments approved subsequent to this date, will be reflected on a revised Compensation Schedule and submitted to Council approval; and WHEREAS, the Compensation Schedule will be revised to reflect the addition of the Building Services Supervisor and Principal Traffic Engineer position titles. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, that it hereby does adopt, as required by California Code of Regulations Title 2, Section 570.5, the revised Fiscal Year 2017-2018 Compensation Schedule effective September 15, 2017, a copy of which is available in the City Clerk’s Office. Presented by Approved as to form by Courtney Chase Glen R. Googins Director of Human Resources City Attorney 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 595 City of Chula Vista Staff Report File#:17-0393, Item#: 17. CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST BY THE CORKY MCMILLIN COMPANIES THAT THE CITY COUNCIL FORM A REIMBURSEMENT DISTRICT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF TOWN CENTER DRIVE (This item was continued from 7/25/17.) RECOMMENDED ACTION Council not direct the City Manager to begin proceedings for the formation of a reimbursement district. SUMMARY Under Chapter 15.50 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code (CVMC) a developer who believes that they have been required to construct or have constructed public improvements that benefit other property owners who have made no contribution to the costs of those improvements may request that City Council direct the City Manager to begin proceedings for the formation of a reimbursement district. The City Clerk received a request (Attachment 1) for the formation of a reimbursement district from the Corky McMillin Companies (Developer) for the construction of the portion of Town Center Drive between Olympic Parkway and the Otay Ranch Mall property line. On July 18, 2017 the Developer requested the item be continued to allow them to submit a letter to include in the record of the public hearing (Attachment 2). After looking further at the circumstances surrounding the construction of Town Center Drive and reviewing the applicable sections of CVMC Chapter 15.50 and State Regulations, City staff does not support beginning district formation proceedings. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Environmental Notice The activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required. Environmental Determination The Director of Development Services has reviewed the proposed activity for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines because it will not result in a physical change in the environment; therefore, pursuant to Section 15060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Thus, no environmental review is required. BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Not Applicable City of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 1 of 3 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 596 File#:17-0393, Item#: 17. DISCUSSION The request made by the Developer on May 31, 2017 for the City to begin formation of a reimbursement district under CVMC Chapter 15.50 involves the evaluation of whether the Developer was required by the City to construct a public improvement that provided additional benefit to property owners that did not contribute to those improvements. In this case the construction of Town Center Drive occurred as a result of a number of actions including the creation of the Sectional Planning Area Plan for Village 12 - Freeway Commercial including subsequent amendments, a General Development Plan and project specific approvals including tentative maps and street dedications. As identified in the Developers letter (Attachment No. 1), they had previously entered into a private reimbursement agreement with Otay Project, L. P. (Baldwin and Sons) to recover their cost of constructing Town Center Drive (Attachment No.3). City staff believes a dispute over the timing and enforceability of this agreement between the two parties is the basis for the Developer’s request for district formation. Because there is an agreement between the two parties outlining an agreement to share costs for the construction of public improvements that benefitted both parties, reimbursement district formation is unnecessary, nor is it required. Should the City Council choose to form the requested reimbursement district, it would be formed pursuant to the provisions of CVMC Chapter 15.50 and Government Code section 66485 through 66489. Formation of a reimbursement district would include a public hearing before the City Council, with affected property owners being provided notice and an opportunity to be heard at the public hearing (see CVMC 15.50.080). If a reimbursement district was ultimately formed, reimbursement would only occur when a benefitted property owner either subdivided the benefited property or pulled a building permit for the benefited property (see CVMC 15.50.090). DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT Staff has reviewed the property holdings of the City Council members and has found no property holdings within 500 feet of the boundaries of the property which is the subject of this action. Consequently, this item does not present a disqualifying real property-related financial conflict of interest under California Code of Regulations Title 2, section 18702.2(a)(11), for purposes of the Political Reform Act (Cal. Gov’t Code §87100,et seq.). Staff is not independently aware, and has not been informed by any City Council member, of any other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter. LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS N/A CURRENT YEAR FISCAL IMPACT None ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT The cost of City processing requests for formation of reimbursement districts would be borne by the developer requesting formation. City of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 2 of 3 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 597 File#:17-0393, Item#: 17. ATTACHMENTS Attachment 1 - Formation Request Letter Attachment 2 - Letter from the Corky McMillin Companies Requesting Continuance Attachment 3 - Right of Way Agreement and Agreement to Reimburse Construction Costs Staff Contact: Kelly Broughton, Director of Development Services City of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 3 of 3 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 598 Dolma Norris, City Clerk City of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Ave., Bldg. A Chula Vista, CA 91910 The Corky McMillin Companie ,c tVEO ZUll JUN -5 A II: 0B Re: CVMC 15.50 Request for Relmbursentent District Dear Ms. Norris: The Corky McMillin Companies ("McMillin') respectfully request that the City Council take action to begin the process to establish a reimbursement district pm'suant to Chula Vista Municipal Code section 15.50.040 for rehnbursements due in comlection with McMillin's design and consmaction of Town Center Drive. Town Center Drive, a fottr-Im e commercial promenade, was constructed in 2005 as part of the development of Otay Ranch Town Center. McMiilin bore the entire cost of constructing Town Center Drive. McMillin also performed the grading for the Otay Ranch Town Center then sold the project to General Growth Properties. Otay Ranch Town Center accesses Town Center Drive, and that proportionate share was dealt with in the land sales transaction. Town Center Drive was constructed across and provides the only access to two parcels, about 160 total acres, owned by developer Baldwin and Sons. (APN Nos. 643-051-30-00 and 643-020-85-00.) In 2004, Baldwin and McMillin entered into Right of Way and Reilnbursement A eement. Despite benefitting from McMillin's construction of Town Center Drive, Baldwin has refused to honor its contractual obligations, or record the agreement against the two parcels. In 2009, (the same year Town Center Drive was accepted into the City,) Baldwin reconfigured the two parcels, adjusted lot lines, consolidated land, and received a Certificate of Compliance from the City to enable Baldwin to proceed with development. Last year, in 2016, an SPA Amendment entitled Baldwin to proceed with the Freeway Connnercial Otay Ranch project. Freeway Commercial includes two hotels with a combined 300 rooms, 310 apartments, 72 single family homes, 200 multi-falmly units, other mixed use, and a public park. Town Center Drive provides the sole access for this entire plamaed development. /To date, none of the developers or property owners, including Baldwin, who have gained access through and subsequently benefitted from McMillin's construction of Town Center Drive have made the requisite contributions and reinlbursements for the costs of said improvements. In accordance with Chapter 15.50 of the CVMC, inclusive of section 15.50.10, McMillin made and paid for the cost of off-site road improvements, Towne Center Drive, and all such property owners who subsequently benefit have made no contribution. Therefore, please place the proposed establishment of a reinabursement district on the public agenda for the next regularly scheduled City Council meeting on Tuesday, June 6, 2017. Very tmly your/ President cc: Gary Halbert Kelly Broughton William Pate Guy Asaro 2750 Womble Road • Suite 200 • San Diego, CA 92106 • Tel (619) 477-4117 ° Fax (6/9) 794-1610 ° www.mcmillin.com2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 599 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 600 ·, RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: 1'.foMillin Otay Ranch, LLC 2727 Hoover A venue National City, CA 91950 Attention: Robert Anselmo (Space Above This Line for Recorder's Office Use Only) RIGHT OF WAY AGREEMENT AND AGREEMENT TO REIMBURSE CONSTRUCTION COSTS THIS RIGHT OF WAY AGRE EMENT AND AG REEM:e@To REIMBURSE CONSTRUCTION COSTS ("Agre ement") is entere d into as of .MiJ,'Nv1e>, 2004 by an d between McMillin Otay Ranch, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("McMillin"), and Otay Project, L.P., a California limited partnership ("OP"), with McMillin and OP being referred to herein from time to time individually as a "Party" and collectively as the "Parties"). A. McMillin owns fee title to that certain real property located in the City of Chula Vista ("City"), State of California more particularly described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference ("McMillin Property"). B. OP owns fee title to that certain real property adjacent to the McMillin Property located in the City and more particularly described on Exhibit ''B'' attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference ("OP Property"). C. The McMillin Property and the OP Property shall be collectively referred to herein as the "Properties" and shall be individually referred to herein as a "Property." D. McMiUin has processed and will be receiving approval for City of Chula Vista Mass Grading Plans for McMillin Otay Ranch -Village 12 -FC Document numbers 03070~01 through 03070-14. E. Performance of work in connection with the construction of portions of Commercial Promenade Street A ("Street A") by McMi11in will require the dedication of a right of way and other easements, and the entry by McMillin (or a contractor hired by McMillin) upon the OP Property for the purposes set forth herein. In addition, the possible mass grading of the OP Property by McMillin (or a contractor hired by McMiUin) will require entry upon the OP Property. As such, the Parties, on behalf of themselves and their ·successors and assigns, desire to enter into this Agreement to grant such rights of way, easements and licenses as are set forth below. freew~y ~ommorci,t agreemenlS.2°1 5127/04 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 601 F. In the event McMillin undertakes construction of work on Street A, or the mass grading of the OP Property, the OP Property will be benefited by such work and the Parties have agreed that McMillin shall be entitled to reimbursement from OP of an agreed upon sum of money as a result of McMillin 's performance of such work as more particularly set forth herein. NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereto hereby agree as follows: 1. Grant of Right of Way. In order to facilitate the improvement of Street A, within ten (10) days of McMillin's or the City's request therefore, OP agrees to deliver an executed irrevocable dedication of right away document in the fonn of Exhibit C in order to grant, dedicate and convey to the City a right of way for Street A (the "Right of Way"), and to grant such other easements or licenses associated therewith as may be requested by the City in connection with the use, grading, constmction and operation of Street A (the "IOD Documents"). The Parties contemplate that the alignment of the Right of Way and configuration for Street A across the OP Property shall be consistent with the street section and alignment described in the , City's Freeway Commercial SPA Plan, as amended (the "SPA"), that certain tentative map recorded against the Properties described as City of Chula Vista Tract #03-11 as adopted by resolution# 2003-165 on April 15 1 \ 2003, the current alignment of which is described in Exhibit C attached. Notwithstanding the foregoing, McMillin will cooperate with any efforts OP conducts to eliminate the need for the mass transit easement in the median of Street A. McMillin shall hold the IOD Documents while OP attempts to obtain the removal of the mass transit easement from the median of Street A. If OP is successful in obtaining the removal of the mass transit easement from the median of Street A, McMillin and OP shall modify the IOD Documents accordingly. If OP is not successful in obtaining the removal of the mass transit easement from the median of Street A by December 31, 2004, then McMillin will be able to record the IOD Documents and proceed with the design and construction of Street A as described in Exhibit C. The Parties understand that the alignment of Street A across the McMillin Property is currently contemplated to be a private loop road similar to the design shown in Exhibit D attached and that such alignment may change from time to time as the development plans for the McMillin Property are finalized. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing herein shall be deemed to prohibit OP from objecting to and opposing any amendments to the Street A design across the OP Property which are materially inconsistent with tbat shown on Exhibit C attached, but OP shall not unreasonably object to any such amendment. OP shall deliver to McMiHin or the City, within ten (10) days of McMillin's or the City>s request therefore~ such deeds, grants, offers to dedicate and other instruments and documents, executed and acknowiedged by OP, as McMillin or the City may request from time to time to cause such Right of Way and other easements to be granted, dedicated, improved and conveyed to the City. Such deeds, gra11ts, offers to dedicate and other instruments and documents shall be in the form reasonably requested by the City. OP shall reimburse McMillin for all improvement costs to design and build Street A across the OP Property pursuant to Section 6 below. 2. Grant of Entry Permit/Letter of Permission. In connection with the improvement of portions of Street A and the possible mass grading of the OP Property, OP shall execute and deliver to McMillin, within ten (10) days of McMillin's request therefore, an entry pe1mit (the "Entry Permit") in the form of Exhibit E attached hereto. In addition, within ten (10) days of McMillin's request therefore, OP shall execute and deliver to McMillin and the City a letter of 2 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 602 permission in the form of Exhibit F attached (the "Letter of Permission") to mass grade the OP Property from its present condition to the condition described in City of Chula Vista Grading Plan Documents 03070-01 through 03070-14 attached hereto as Exhibit G and which will be attached as a schedule to the Letter of Pennission (the "Grading Plan"). OP agrees that the form of Entry Permit and/or the form of Letter of Permission will be modified to a form reasonably satisfactory to the City, if so required by the City. 3. Mass Grading of the OP Property. If OP has not previously delivered the OP Election Notice to McMillin as provided in Section 4 below, McMillin agrees that, no sooner than 30 days prior to such time as McMillin intends, in good faith, to commence mass grading operations on the McMilJin Property, it shall provide written notice (the "Grading Notice") to OP fl of McMillin's intent to commence mass grading on the OP Property as well, consistent with the ~ Grading PlanAMcMillin and OP shall (i) execute a competitively bid grading contract specifying lrpriee-for1he ~mbined mass grading of the McMillin Property and the OP Property, and (ii) in good faith attempt to cause the grading of the Properties in a manner that minimizes, to the extent reasonably practicable, (a) the amount of materials required to be exported from the Properties to the EUC, and (b) the cost to export such materials. McMillin shall have no obligation to perform any work beyond the work shown in the Grading Plan ( e.g., OP shall be solely responsible for all other grading and other work on the OP Property, including, without limitation, finish and remedial grading work). OP shall reimburse McMillin for OP's share of all grading costs pursuant to Section 6 below. Upon Completion of the mass grading work as described in Section 6.3 below, OP shall be deemed to have accepted same in its "as is" condition and McMillin shall have no liability or responsibility for same. 4. QP's Election to Grade. If McMillin has not given OP a Grading Notice by November 30, 2004, OP shall have the right to grade the OP Property at its own expense. After McMillin has delivered the Grading Notice to OP, then OP shall not have the right to grade the OP Property at its own expense and will only have the right to reimburse McMillin for the grading of the OP Property pursuant to Section 6 below. In the event that OP elects to grade the OP Property, OP shall promptly deliver to McMillin written notice of such election (the "OP Election Notice"). In such event, McMillin shall allow OP to use the disposal site in the EUC described in Exhibit H attached (the "Disposal Site") for purposes of exporting materials from the OP Property, and shall execute any and all entry permits (in a form substantially similar to Exhibit E), licenses and other documents reasonably necessary to provide OP haul route access over the McMillin Prope1ty subject, however, to the following conditions, the satisfaction of which shall be at the sole cost and expense of OP: 4.1. OP shall establish, to the reasonable satisfaction of McMillin, and OP shall thereafter ensure, that the timing of the OP grading work and the export of materials will not conflict with McMillin's use, work or operations in the EUC or any other construction operation being conducted by McMillin or its contractors; 4.2. OP shall establish, to the reasonable satisfaction of McMillin, and OP shall thereafter ensure, that OP's grading of the OP Property will commence and be completed before McMillin commences grading the McMillin Property; 3 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 603 4.3. OP shall establish, to the reasonable satisfaction of McMillin, and OP shall thereafier ensure, that transport of dirt to the Disposal Site will be completed before the commencement of grading for the SR125 toll road; 4.4. OP shall establish, to the reasonable satisfaction of McMillin, and OP shall thereafter ensure, that aU fill will consist of materials reasonably acceptable to McMillin, and such fill will be placed, and the Disposal Site prepared and left in a manner and condition reasonably acceptable to McMillin's geoteclmical consultant, including, without limitation, the removal and compaction of alluvium, the installation of canyon subdrains, and any remedial grading or interim drainage infrastructure reasonably deemed necessary by such consultant; 4.5. OP shall execute and deliver to McMillin an entry permit, in a form a11d content acceptable to McMillin, covering the actions and omission of OP and its contractors associated with the export and disposal of all such materials (the fonu of such entry permit shall be similar in fonn to the Entry Permit described in Exhibit E, modified by McMillin as appropriate for such entry by OP and its contractors); and 4.6. OP shall establish, to the reasonable satisfaction of McMillin, and OP shall thereafter ensure, that, once the expo1t operation is complete, (i) any haul route shall be reasonably restored to the condition that existed prior to the hauling of materials, (ii) all disturbed or graded areas to be as-built as directed by McMillin's civil engineer and the revised topography prepared, and (iii) all erosion control measures set forth in McMillin's Stonn Water Pollution Prevention Plan and all requirements of the City shall be completed and implemented. 5. Landscape Buffer. If McMillin chooses to develop the retail power center currently contemplated in the SPA plan for the McMillin Property or otherwise proposes a site plan or architectural treatment that (a) requires the backs of buildings or back of building type operations (i.e., dumpsters, loading docks, etc). to be adjacent to the OP Property and (b) , in OP's reasonable judgment, creates ru1 adverse impact on OP then so long as OP delivers written notice of such election to McMillin prior to the commencement of construction work on the McMillin Property, OP may require that McMillin install a ten (10) foot landscape buffer on the McMillin Property as depicted in Exhibit 8 of the SPA prior to occupancy of any of the pennanent commercial buildings on either the McMillin Property or the OP Property. 6. Cost Reimbursements. 6.1 Within twenty (20) days following the Jater to occur of (i) the de)ivery by McMillin to OP of an invoice setting forth the "OP Street A Costs" (as defined below) or (ii) the date a~ubdjyjs1pn or parcel maE is recorded with respect to all or any portion of the OP Property, OP shall pay to McMillin 100% of the OP Street A Costs. As used herein, the term " OP Street A Costs'' shall include all costs and expenses of any nature incurred or payable by McMillin or its successors or assigns with respect to the design, grading, construction or improvement of Street A north of the southern boundary of the OP Property, as such boundaries exist as of the date of this Agreement. Such costs shall not include any interest, debt service, or other opportunity costs associated with McMillin providing design, construction, or improvement of Street A at an earlier time than McMillin wou]d normally provide such work.McMillin will provide to OP supporting documentation for such OP Street A Costs, togeU1er with lien releases 4 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 604 or other evidence demonstrating that no liens arising from the improvement work on Street A perfonned by McMillin encumber the OP Property, In the event McMillin receives reimbursement or credits for the OP Street A Costs from any governmental entity or improvement bond funding, then OP shall he entitled to receive such credits or reimbursements, but in no event to exceed the amount of OP Street A Costs actually paid by OP to McMillin. Prior to commencing any mass grading work on the OP Property, McMillin shall cause its engineer to provide OP with the estimated amount of materials that will be required to be exported from the Properties to the EUC (the "Export Amount") and the estimated cost to (i) grade the OP Property in accordance with the Grading Plan, (ii) export the Export Amount to from the Properties to the EUC, and (iii) design and build Street A across the OP Property. OP shall have five (5) business days following receipt of written notice to deliver its written notice to McMillin of OP 1s objection to the Export Amount or the estimated costs described in the notice from McMillin. If OP does not deliver written notice of objection to such stated Export Amount or estimated costs to McMillin within such five (5) business day period, then OP shall be deemed to have approved such Export Amount and estimated costs. If OP objects to such Export Amount, then Hunsacker & Associates shall make the determination of the Export Amount, which detennination shall be binding upon the Parties. OP understands and agrees that the actual quantities may change during grading operations due to field conditions, and the Export Amount shall be adjusted accordingly. In this regard, the parties agree that OP shall be entitled to monitor the activities and soils calculations of the grading contractor and other consultants on site. Any disputes as to the on site calculations shall be resolved by Hunsacker and Associates.OP acknowledges that the McMillin Property balances for grading purposes and that the only reason the export of materials from the Property could be required is because the OP Property requires the export of material. Therefore, OP agrees to pay for all costs and expenses associated with exp011ing the actual quantity of materials determined upon completion of the grading work in accordance with the provisions of Section 3 above. In addition, both parties agree the estimated costs will be estimates for planning purposes and the actual costs will be determined by the contracts described in Section 3 above. 6.3 In the event McMillin mass grades all or any portion of the OP Property as· provided in Section 3 above, OP shaII pay to McMillin 100% of the total costs and expenses incmTed or payable by McMillin or its successors or assigns which are solely related to the mass grading of the OP Property (the "OP Grading Costs") consistent with the provisions of Section 3 above. The OP Grading Costs shall include, without limitation,100% of the total cost for the grading on the OP Property as shown in the Grading Plan, together with 100% of any additional costs or expenses incurred or payable in connection with removal, transport and disposition of any excess materials from the Properties to the Disposal Site. In addition, the OP Grading Costs shall include, and OP shall be solely responsible for, I 00% of any and all costs and expenses associated with any special or extraordinary soils or other conditions on or under the OP Property which affect the grading work. Similarly, McMillin shall be solely responsible for 100% of any and al! costs and expenses associated with any special or extraordinary soils or other conditions on or under the McMHlin Property which affect the grading work As used herein, "Completion" of the grading work on the OP Property performed by McMillin shall be deemed to have occurred on the later to occur of (a) when the substantial completion of such work in accordance with the City approved mass grading plans has been certified to have occurred by the civil engineer of the Party undertaking the Grading Work (and when the other Party has been provided a copy of such certification), and (b) when the Party perfonning the grading work has provided to the other Party copies of full lien releases 5 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 605 for all of the grading work related to the OP Property. OP shall pay to McMillin all of the OP Grading Costs within twenty (20) days of the later to occur of (i) the Completion of the mass grading work for the OP Property, or (ii) the delivery by McMillin to OP of an invoice setting forth the OP Grading Costs, together with reasonable supporting documentation. 6. Termination: Quitclaim. Upon termination of a Party's rights, or certain of them, under this Agreement, that Party agrees that it shall, within five (5) business days from written request by the other Party, execute, deliver and permit to be recorded a quitclaim deed or other instmment in a form reasonably requested by the other Party evidencing a tennination of that Party's particular rights. The Parties acknowledge that the rights of each Party hereunder may not terminate concurrently and, in such event, the te1ms of this Agreement shall survive execution, delivery and recordation of a quitclaim by one Party as necessary to preserve the rights of the other Party hereunder and/or as necessary to preserve the remaining rights hereunder of the Party delivering the quitclaim until its rights similarly terminate. 7. Amendment. This Agreement or any portion hereof may be amended or modified 1 except where otherwise provided in this Agreement, only by the written assent or vote of both Parties. 8. Successors and Assigns. The covenants, obligations, rights, burdens and agreements contained in this Agreement shall run with the land and be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Parties and their respective heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns and successors in interest, as the case may be. As used in this Agreement, the tenn "Party" and "Parties" shall include the original parties to this Agreement as well as the successor owners of the Properties. 9. Noticeg. All written notices required to be given pursuant to the terms hereof shall be sent by (a) personal delivery, (b) a nationally recognized ovemight courier service, or (c) United States first class mail, registered or certified retum receipt requested and postage prepaid as expressly provided herein. All notices shall be addressed as follows: To McMillin: To OP: McMillin Olay Ranch, LLC 2727 Hoover Avenue National City, CA 91950 Attention: Mr, Robert Anselmo The Otay Ranch Company 350 West Ash Street, Suite 730San Diego, CA 92101 Attn: Robert Cameron The foregoing addresses may be changed 'by written notice. All notices shall be deemed received on the earliest to occur of (a) actual delivery, (b) the next business day following timely 6 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 606 deposit with an overnight courier service, or (c) three (3) business days following deposit in tl1e U.S. Mail 1 as provided above. 10. Attorneys' Fees . If one of the Parties defaults in the performance or observance of any provision of this Agreement, and the Party entitled to enforce the provisions thereof has obtained the services of an attorney with respect to the defaults involved, the Party who is in default agrees to pay to such Party, as a condition of settlement of such default, any costs or fees involved, including reasonable attomeys' fees. In the event an action is commenced to enforce · any of the provisions contained herein, the prevailing Party shall be entitled to recover from the other party reasonable attorneys' fees and costs of such suit (including, without limitation, expert witness fees and costs of appeal, if applicable), whether or not such action proceeds to final judgment. 11. Co unteiparts . This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be an original, but when taken together shall constitute but one agreement. 12. Sever ability. In the event any provision of this Agreement, shall be held to be invalid or unenforceable by any court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not invalidate or render unenforceable any other provision hereof. 13. Govem ing Law . This Agreement shall be construed and interpreted in accordance with and shall be govemed and enforced in all respects according to the laws of the State of California. 14. Entire Agreement/Enforceab ility . This Agreement contains the entire understanding of the parties and supersede any and all other written or oral understandings. The Parties agree to record this Agreement within three days of the execution and delivery hereof by both Parties. 15. Waiver. The waiver by any party of a breach of any provision of this Agreement shall not be deemed a continuing waiver or a waiver of any subsequent breach whether of the same or of another provision hereof. 7 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 607 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement was executed by the parties hereto as of the date and year first above written. McMILLIN: McMillin Otay Ranch, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company By: By: Its: Its: __ v_.f_ ... ___ _ 8 OP: Otay Project, L.P., a California limited partnership By: Otay Project LLC, a California limited liability company Its: General Partner By: Its: Otay Ranch Development, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Authorized M& By:~ Its: ~ 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 608 STATE OF CALIFORNIA } } ss . COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO } On this 10th day of June, 2004, before me, Joyce Rooks, a Notary Pub.lie in and for said State, personally appeared ROBERT ANSELMO, personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his authorized capacity(ies), and that by his signature(s) on the instrument, the person, or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument. Notary Acknowledgemenl 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 609 STATE OF CALIFORNIA } } ss. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO } On this 10th day of June, 2004, before me, Joyce Rooks, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared VINCENT G. FERRER, personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his authorized capacity, and that by llis signature on the instrument, the person, or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and offi cia l seal. Notary Acknowledgement JOYCE ROOKS COMt,11. I 141785~,u Q MOTMY f'l.8LJC('.>J.IVNW'\ () SAN DIEGO COUNTY COMM . EXP . MAY 1-t , 2008.,. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 610 CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT Name(• ~. 1( o 'i ~ersonally known to me bproved to me on the basis at satisfactory evidence to be the person(r,1 whose namefs'{ ~ subscribed to thi · wit ins tru ment and acknowledged to me e !lh~ executed the sa~e in h ~ th r _A.lhorlze_p- capaolly s), an I al y ~/J1'er/ll'reir s!gnatur (syon the Instrument 111e persan(t:1', or the entity {1pon bel1alf of which the person(~ a~eeu~ the instrument. y~oll~&QQ ~ -~&l-,.,~ ,q ~~~~~~~~~~~OPTIONAL~~~~~~~~~~~ Thougll lhe Information below is no/ requ/r11d Oy law, It m11y prove valu11bl11 lo p11rsons relying on /he dac:ument and co11/rf provenr fraudulent ramoval find reflttaahmenl o/ /his form lo 811()/h11r doctimenl. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document:------------------------- Document Date: __________________ Number of Pages: ___ _ Slgner(s) other Than Named Above:---------------------- Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer Signer's Name:---------------------- 0 Individual D Corporate Officer-lllle(s): ----------------- 0 Partner -0 Limited D General D Attorney-In-Fact 0 Trustee D Guardian or Conse1valor 0 Other:------------------------ Signer rs Repre se nting: ___________________ _ 11.'.II:' Top ol lnliml) here •J c:i 11199 NalioMI HOlo,y Arnlcialion • 8350 Do Solo Avo .. P.O. eo, 2~02 • Ch•lsworth, CA 8131H4-02 • ......... noliOnalnolal)l,i119 Proo. No. 6007 Roorda,: Cnll TolHroo 1·800-876-81127 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 611 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF McMlLLIN PROPERTY 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 612 05/20/2004 THU 14:27 FAX J-13715M EXHIBIT \\A" Legal Description for the Freeway Commerci~I Parcel 2 In the City of Chula Vista accorcHng to the Parcel Map thereof No. 18481, on file In the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, State of Callfornla. Excepting therefrom SR-125 Right-of-way as granted per Document No. 2003- 0604600. Jb/1371Sm.01S ~002/003 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 613 . 05/20/2004 THU 14:27 FAX l I,() (\J .... I 0:: l/) LOT 'F' OF MAP 14559 (0.27 4 ACRES NOT INCLUDED IN TOTAL 86.9 AC> PORilON Or FARCeL 2 Dr PARC£L MAP J84BJ R/W GRANTED PER DOCUMENT N0.2003-0604600 R/W BIRCH ROA D 400 200 0 400 1300 1200 GRAPHIC SCALE 111:: 400' EXHIBIT A-1 McMILLIN OTAY RANCH @003/003 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 614 EXHIBIT "B" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF OP PROPERTY 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 615 06/25/2004 FRI 14:21 FAX EXHIBIT "B" LEGAL DESCRIPTION Otder Number. 0I'V·U93467 Pag~ Number'. B Real property in the City of Chula Vista, County of San Diego, State of califomla, described as follo ws: PARCEL A: THAT PORTION OF lrfE FRACTIONAL SOlffifE.ASr QUARTER Of SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 18 SOUTH , RANG E 1 WES'J', SAN BERNARDINO .MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DI EGO, STATE OF CALI FORNIA, ACCORDI NG TO lliE OFFICIAL PLAT TH EREOF, FILED IN TtiE OFFICE OF THE COU NTY RECORD ER OF SAID COUNTY, LYlNG S01JniWE51ERLY OF THE f-OUOWING DESCRIBED LINE: BEGINNING AT TifE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 18 SOU'TH, RANGE 1 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 3 SOt.m-1 00 DEGREES 41'2.4" WEST 2332,04 fEEf TO THE NOR.niERLY UNE OF-SAlO LOT 11 OF OTAY RANCH, MAP ND. 862 ON FILE IN WE OFFICE OF THE C,OUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE'AlONG SAID NORlliERLY UNE OF SAID LOT 11, SOUTH 71 DEGREES 56'55" WEST 261.61 FEET TO n1E BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT :2000,00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORn-tERl Y, A RADIAL UNE TO SAID OJRVE BEARS SOlJTH 15 PEGR.EES 18'48~ WEST, SAID POlNT ALSO BEING THI: 'TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE LEAVING lHE NORTI-11:RLY UNE OF SAID.LO'f 11 WESTERLY AlONG SAID CURVE TI4ROUGH A CEITTRAL ANGl£ OF 01 DEGREES 05'43'' AN ARC DISTANCE OF 3B.23 FEET; THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE NORTH 73 DEGREES 3S'29" Wf.Sf 618.51 FEETTO 1HE BEGINNING OF A 1600.00 . FOOT RADIUS -CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CEITTRAL ANGLE OF 38 DEGREES 34'39" AN ARC DISfANCE OF 1077.29 FEET; THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE NORTii 35 DEGREES 00'50" WEST 370.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENr.1600.00 FOOT RAD IUS OJRVE CONCAVE SOt.m-i W!:STERD'; THENCE NO RTiiW ESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE TH ROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 31 DEGREES 25'13" AN ARC DISTANCE Of 877.-12 FEET TO THE WES'TERLY UNE OF SAID FRACTIONAL SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 3, YOWNSHIP 18. SOlJTH, RANGE 1 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MEfUDlAN. EXCEPTING THEREFROM lHAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN DEED RECORDED MAY 22, 2003 /1S PILE NO. 2003-0604615. Of OFFICIAL RECORDS. PARCEL B: PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 18789, IN llfE CITY QF Q-IUlA VI~TA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, SfATE OF CAUFORNIA, flLED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNlY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNlY, SEPTEMBER 7, 2001 ~ FIL.f NO. 01·0642802 OF OfFICJAL RECORDS. EXCEPTING THEREFROM lliAT PORTION.LYING WITHIN CHUlA VISTA TRACT NO. 02-05, OTAY RANCH VIUAGE SlX "A" MAP NO. 1, IN 11iE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STA'TE OF CAllfORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAt> 'THEREOF NO. ~4446 FJLEO IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUN'TY, ON SE'PTEMBER 18, 2002. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM TI:lAT PORTION CONVEYED TO TI-lE STA'TE OF CAUFORNIA IN Dl:ED RECORDED MAY 22, 2003 AS FILE NO. 2003-0604615 OF OFFIClAL RECORDS. APN: 643-020-28-00 First American 77tle ~002/003 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 616 06/25/2004 FRI 14:21 FAX @003/003 ~ ~i ~ :: 1 fa 21 " K a :i 8 ,,~ 5' .':l J1 ,, '_i ~ ..--" l" ~ &l I w ...... ~i! Q~ ..., 5 . Njjj u, ..... .. l~i QJ,,'i'tmn ~ ,. co ..... ,~ .. , ' I ~ ~\ . .~ i?, :<( ::::!. 11: Qij~ .J t ~r .l 01~\iNNr'l • "! :::;:o 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 617 EXHIBIT "C'' PROPOSED ALIGNMENT OF STREET A 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 618 Recording reqiiesled by and please return to: City Clerk City of Chula Vista P .O. Box l 087 Chula Vista, CA 91912 This instrument berrefi/S: Cily, 011/y. No fee required A (This space for Recorder's use , ohly) 4 APN(s) 643-020-28. 64 3-051·29 C.V. File No .-------- IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF DEDICATION OF FEE INTEREST FOR A VALUABL~ CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Otay Project L.P. represents that, as the owner(s) of the herein-described real property, (in the case of multiple owners, collectively referred to as "Grantor"), Granter hereby makes an Irrevocable Offer of Dedication of fee interest to THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, the hereinafter described real property for the folJowing public purpose: PUBLIC STREET The real property referred to above is situated in the City of Chula Vista, County of San Diego, State of California, and ~s more particularly described as follows : SEE ATTACHED: EXHIBIT A FOR LEGAL DESCIUPTION EXHIBIT B FOR PLAT This Offer of Dedication is made pursuant to Section 7050 of the Govenunent Code.of the State of California and may be accepted at any lime by the City Clerk of the City of Chula Vista. This Offer of Dedication of fee interest shall be irrevocable and shall be binding on the Gran tor, its heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns. Page I of 2 jb/jermiferl iodform_cv _Kar I 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 619 SIGNATURE PAGE Signed this ____ day of ________ , 20 __ Grantor Signatures : (Notary Acknowledgment Required for Each Signatory) This is to certify that the interest in real property offered herein to the City of Chula Vista, a governmental agency, is hereby acknowledged by the undersigned, City Clerk, on behalf of the Chula Vista City Council pursuant to authority conferred by Resolution No. 15645 of the Chula Vista City Council adopted on June 5, 1990, and the grantee(s/consent(s) to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer. SUSAN BIGELOW CITY CLERK jblj ennf erliodfonn_ cv _Karl Date: ___________ _ Page 2 of2 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 620 . ... . J-14190H EXHIBIT \IA" OTAY OFFSITE DEDICATION Parcel "A" That portion of Parcel 2 of Parcel Map No. 18789 and that portion of the Southeast Quarter of Section 3, Township 18 South, Range 1 West, San Bernardino Meridian, in the City of Chula Vista, County of San Diego, State of California, described as follows: · · Commencing at a point on the Southeasterly line of said Parcel 2 being the Northwesterly corner of Parcel 2 of Parcel Map No. 18481; thence North 71 °57'24" East along said Southeasterly line of Parcel 2 of Parcel Map No. 18789 a distance of 906.57 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, and the beginning of a non-tangent 1171.00 foot radius curve concave Southeasterly, to which a radial line bears South 83 °58'44" West; thence leaving said line Northeasterly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 42°36'31" a distance of 870.82 feet; thence North 36°35'15" East 113.39 feet to a point on the Southwesterly Rrght-of-way line of Olympic Parkway, recorded December 17, 2002 as Document No. 2002-1153497 and the beginning of a non-tangent 1680.00 foot radius curve concave Northeasterly, to which a radial line bears South 39°00'35" West; thence Southeasterly along the arc of said curve and said Southwesterly Right-of-way line through a central an.gle of 05°09'06 11 a distance of 151.05 feet; thence leaving said Right-of-way line South 36°35'15 11 West 113.79 feet to the beginning of a tangent 1020.00 foot radius curve concave Southeasterly; thence Southwesterly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 10°00'24" a distance of 178.14 feet; thence South 26°34'51" West 83.52 feet to the beginning of a·tangent 636.93 foot radius curve concave South·easterly; thence Southwesterly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 12°18'01" a distance of 136.74 feet to the beginning of a compound 1029.00 foot radius curve concave Easterly; thence Southerly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 18°36'45" a distance of 334.27 feet to a point on said Southeasterly llne of Parcel 2 of Parcel Map No. 18789; thence South 71 °57'24" West along said Southeasterly line 145.64 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Jb/1419011.001 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 621 EXHIBIT 11B" PARCEL ''A" STREET DEDICATION HEREON, 3.065 /JCRES SF l/4 SEC., 3 POINT OF COMMENCEMENT 300 150 0 SCALE 111= 300' ----..:::,,,..145.64' TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING rJ1Jr;Jr,r'/ 2 r r 11 vC.,~ PJI/J I 848 I SHEET 1 OF 1 SHEET -N- 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 622 Recording Requested by and Please Return to: City Clerk City of Chula Vista P.O. Box 1087 Chula Vista, California 91912 This Instrument Benefits City Only. No Fee -Required APN(s) 643-020-28, 643-051-29 • This Space/or Recorder's Use Only • C.V . File No .-·------- SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the owner of that certain property hereinafter described has granted lo the City of Chula Vista, a municipal corporation, in the County of San Diego, State of California, the pennanent easement and right of way. (LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY IS ATTACHED) AND WHEREAS, F irs t Bank and T rust, a Ca lifomfa Corp orati o n is hereinafter known as the "Beneficiary"; and First Bank and T ru st. a CaLifomia C o rp orati o n is hereinafter known as the "Trustee" as of the date of this instrument under that certain Deed of Tmst executed by Ola y P ro ject LP ., a Californi a Limit ed Partn e rs h ip to secure (a) note(s) for Fourteen million dollars ($_14.000 ,00 0.00 ) with interest dated May 14 1 20..Q2__ and recorded on ___,__J=un=e'-7'------ 20~_in Official Records of the San Diego County Rec?rder, covering the property hereinabove described, as Document No. 02-0485732 --------,-- AND WHEREAS, the Beneficiary affinns that he/she/it/they is/are the owner and holder of the hereinabove described Trust Deed not and do(es) hereby direct and authorize said Trustee to join in the execution of this instiument. NOW, THEREFORE. for and in consideration of lhe benefits to accrne to the above described land by acceptance of said easement by said City of Chula Vista, the undersigned expressly subordinates all right, title and interest in and to that portion of said premises described, covered by said Deed of Trust, to the interest of said City of Chula Vista in said easement with the intent that said easement shall be prior and superior to the lien of the Deed ofTntsl hereinabove described. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Beneficiary and Trustee have caused this instrument to be executed this __ _ day of , 20_. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 623 AS TRUSTEE: AS BENEFICIARY: Signature/Title Signature/Title Signature/Title Signature/Title (Notary Acknowledgment Required for Each Signatory) jb/subagrccment_c.hulivista. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 624 EXHIBIT.'D" ALLIGNMENT OF STREET A ON MCMILLIN PROPERTY 2 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 625 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 626 EXHIBIT "E" FORM OF ENTRY PERMIT ENTRY PERMIT THIS ENTRY PERMIT is made as of this day of , 2003, by and between Otay Project L. P., a California limited partnership (hereinafter "Licensor") and McMillin Otay Ranch, LLC (hereinafter "Licensee"). RECITALS A. Licensee owns certain real property ("Licensee's Property") in the City of Chula Vista ("City"), more particularly described in Exhibit A attached. B. Licensor owns certain real property ("Licensor's Property") located adjacent to Licensee's Property and described in Exhibit B attached . C. Licensor and Licensee have entered into that certain Right of Way Agreement and Agreement To Reimburse Construction Costs dated as of , 2003 (the "Construction and Grading Agreement") which provides, among other things, for Licensor's grant of a right of way for the construction of a street across a portion of Licensor's Property, along with the possible mass grading of Licensor's Property by Licensee. D. Licensee desires to come on Licensor's Property for the purpose of (i) constructing certain street improvements in accordance with the plans (the ''Street Improvement Plans") described in Exhibit C, and (ii) [insert if under the terms of the Construction and Grading Agreement Licensee is required to mass grade the OP Property} grading Licensor's Property in accordance with the plans (the "Grading Plans '1 described in .Exhibit D. TERMS AND CONDITIONS NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. License to Enter and Use Property. Subject to the tenns and provisions hereof, Licensor hereby grants to Licensee an i11·evocable, non-exclusive license to enter upon Licensor's Property solely for the purpose of perfom1ing the construction [and grading} work in substantial accordance with the Street Improvement Plans [and the Grading Plans}, subject to Licensee's compliance with all the tenns of this Entry Pe1mit. This license and permission extends to Licensee's duly authorized representatives, agents, employees or contractors (collectively "Representatives") in connection with their entry upon Licensor's Property hereunder. 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 627 2. Term. The tenn of this Ent1y Pennit shall commence as of the date hereof and the right to enter Licensor's Property shall automatically terminate without further instructions from the party upon the completion of the work. 3. Government Regulations and Other Obligations of Licensee. Licensor agrees to e)(ecute documents necessary for Licensee to obtain all governmental pennits and authorizations. While on Licensor's Property, Licensee will comply, and will cause all of its Representatives on Licensor's Property to comply, with aJI applicable governmental laws and regulations. All persons who enter upon Licensor's Property pursuant to this Entry Permit do so at their own risk. 4. Liens. So long as Licensor pays to Licensee all amounts due to Licensee pursuant to the Construction and Grading Agreement, Licensee shall not suffer or permit to be imposed on or enforced against Licensor's Property, or any part thereof, any mechanics', materialmen's, contractors', subcontractors' or other liens or any claim for damage arising from any activities or work conducted on or about Licensor's Property by or on behalf of Licensee, and Licensee shall pay or cause to be paid any liens, claims or demands before any action is brought to enforce the same against Licensor's Property. Licensee hereby agrees to indemnify, defend and hold Licensor and Licensor's Property free and ham1less from all liability for any and all such liens, claims and demands, together with reasonable attorneys' fees and all costs and expenses in connection therewith . Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth above, if Licensee shall in good faith contest the validity of any such lien, claim or demand, then Licensee shall, at its expense, defend itself and Licensor against the same and shall pay and satisfy any adverse judgment that may be rendered thereon before the enforcement thereof against Licensor or Licensor's Property, and, if Licensor shall require, Licensee shall procure and record or furnish to Licensor a surety bond or other acceptable security satisfactory to Licensor in an amount at least equal to one and one-half times such contested lien, claim or demand indemnifying Licensor against liability for the same and holding Licensor's Property free from the effect of any lien or claim. Licensor reserves the right at any time and from time to time to post and maintain on Licensor's Property or any portion thereof or improvement thereon snch notices of nonresponsibility or otherwise as may be necessary to protect Licensor against liability for any such liens and claims. 5. Notice of Nonresponsibility. Immediately upon entry upon any portion of Licensor's Property for the pmpose of commencing the activity permitted under this Entry Permit, Licensee shall provide immediate written notice of such activity to Licensor so Urnt Licensor can post on Licensor's Property and record a notice of nonresponsibility. 6. Licensor Not Liable. As a material part of the consideration for this Entry Permit, Licensee hereby waives and agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Licensor and its lenders, agents, employees and contractors from and against any loss, damage, injury, accident, fire or other casualty, liability, claim, cost or expense (including but not limited to attqmeys' fees) of any kind or character arising from (i) any bodily injury, property damage, accident, fire or other casualty on Licensor's Property directly resulting from Licensee's or its Representatives' activities on Licensor's Property, (ii) any violation or alleged violation by Licensee or its Representatives on Licensor's Property of any law, ordinance, or regulation now 2 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 628 or hereafter enacted, or (iii) any default or breach by Licensee of its obligations under this Entry Permit. 7. Insurance. Prior to Licensee commencing any work on Licensor's Property, and until Licensee ceases such activities, Licensee shall at its expense maintain, with a reputable company or companies qualified to do business in California, a policy or policies of commercial general liability insurance with t'espect to the operations on behalf of Licensee on or about the property, with a liability limit of not less than $2,000,000. Licensee shall name Licensor as an "Additional Insured 11 on an such policies of insurance prior to commencement of any work. Certificates of Insurance and Additional Insured endorsements evidencing all such insurance shall be provided to Licensor prior to Licensee entering Licensor's Property, and shalt be maintained by Licensee until completion of work. 8. Vacation. Licensor acknowledges that this Entry Pennit is solely a license and that Licen see has no rights as an owner, purchaser or tenant by virtue hereof. Upon tennination of this Entry Permit for any reason, Licensee shall promptly vacate Licensor's Property. 9. Inspection. Licensor and any authorized representative, employee, agent or independent contractor shall be entitled to enter and inspect Licensor's Property or any portion thereof or improvements or work of Licensee thereon at any time and from time to time. 10. Assignability. This Entry Permit shall be binding upon the parties hereto and their respective heirs, successors, representatives and assigns. 11. Cost of Enforcement. In the event it is necessary for either party to employ an attorney or other person or commence an action to enforce any of the provisions of this Entry Pennit, the prevailing party, as detennined by the court, sha11 be entitled to receive from the other party all costs of enforcement in connection therewith, including, but not limited to, court costs and attorneys' fees. 12. Exhibits. The following exhibits attached hereto are incorporated herein by reference: Exhibit A--Licensee's Property Exhibit B-Licensor's Property Exhibit C -Street A IOD Exhibit D-Grading Plans [if applicable] 13. Miscellaneous. No supplement, modification or amendment of this Entry Permit shall be binding unless in writing and executed by the parties hereto. No waiver of any of the provisions of this Entry Permit shall be deemed or shall constitute a waiver of any other provisions, whether o"r not similar, nor shall any waiver be a continuing waiver. No waiver shall be binding unless executed in writing by the party making the waiver. This Entry Penuit shall be construed and enforced in accordance with, and governed by, the laws of the State of California. The headings of this Entry Pennit are for purposes ofreference only and shall not limit or define 3 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 629 the meaning of the provisions hereof. This Entry Pennit may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this instrument as of the date first above written. LICENSEE: McMillin Otay Ranch, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company By: McMillin Companies, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company By: Its: 4 LICENSOR: Otay Project, L.P., a California limited partnership By: Otay Project LLC, a California limited liability company Its: General Partner By: Otay Ranch Development, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Its: Authori zed Me By: Its: 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 630 EXHIBIT "F" FORM OF LETTER OF PERMISSION 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 631 June 8, 2004 Mr. Alex Al-agha City Engineer City of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 Re: Offsite Letter of Permission to Grade McMillin Otey Ranch Planning Area 12 Dear Mr. Alex: THE OTAY RANCH COMPANY We are the owners of the following described property: A portion of Parcel 2 of Parcel Map No. 18789, and a portion of the fractional southeast quarter of Section 3, Township 18 south, range 1 west, San Bernardino Meridian, a11 in the City of Chula Vista, County of San Diego, State of California. We hereby grant McMillin Otay Ranch LLC, or its successors and assigns, pem1ission to enter upon and perfonn grading operations, consistent with our executed Entry Pennit, on the above- described property in substantial confonnance with City Drawing Numbers: 03070-01 through 03070-14. Sincerely, Otay Project L.P., a California limited partnership, By: Otay Project LLC a California limited liability company, its General Partner, By: Otay Ranch Development, LLC a Delaware limited liability company> il~iX B· .~ Vice President _f)_ff/o4- Date 6t0 W. ASH STREET, SUITE 1500, SAN DIEGO, CA 92101 • PH : (61Yl 2H·40SO • FK, (6\91 23~·408& , WWW OTAYRP.NCH.COM 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 632 EXHIBIT "G,, GRADING PLAN 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 633 11i~ J! ih~ Ji l:11 ~, !~i~ r~ jtz" ~i 11HB .( !l.s! '1-.t.,.: i~K J!~j ii&l ·~!~ m -,;it-·ffl ~f! i -· £~i )· 7,. s~,; ~=~ ;;Js.Jf ;;:! ~=1 Lh'( t· ... ; w f ,•1 ;lr •• ! ,:, ;i; f11 t.ii JI •t 11,. r~~ 'H! ._5, I"! I~¥ )i rl; ·I: iiJ f~;i :~-A,f 1l!i 1 .<; fC: •llr, ~~·f "-'i~~ 1v• ~··11> t' it ~ lf • ,;;!J Hwf " 11 ' I • !z II I -~ "j I 8 11 -1 f.l ? I ·11 § 1; • ~ m 1• I ~ . I ! g f JIJ) l •. t t . ) . '!" ;t• ' I ·1 1 -~.-:.:~ :r! 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 634 l J "' Iii ! L!l 11 rJIOl . I • -· 'i ' l ii/~ >-I " ~. : l • _r a I t.' i, ;., I ' ___ ._ ___ _ 11 i : I I ~ ?. ,, _:! .... ,, 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 635 I ,__. !l I ! I ! I I '4 !. L i 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 636 ' ' ............. ~ l,.J "' ~ ~ i 1 " . ~ ~ i t ;; • 0 l.6:e r o i ~' I • i l i I • i i i i I I I I 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 637 l IS II • t ' . i ~ 0 ~ ~ t 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 638 1 1 r I; l I I I . t ~ j 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 639 a ·o~ lllHS 33G ,.,; ,, ' •. ' i I ~ l ' A • ~ .. • ~ R I ! 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 640 ! .( '! 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 641 ·--;,=;i;:::.':=:llffl'm,:i;;:;n;, -···i j i-l -· ~·;~· ---·-l---~---~--l ~- "' D 0 <0 0 co "' .~ jw "# ~·-+···oC.iw •: ~ 't . ~ 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 642 --··--·-_ ...... -····------------·-----..... ____ , 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 643 ... 'i".'1 ·· .... , lu · . \ i ~ ~ . ., .. • ~ ! ·. " . . , · . ~ ,. I \ .. ; 1 l i . I § I ·····-. ~ .,~ .,oa :f ... ~ ... _ o"r;; ,( l;; ~~c iii: ..... re .,~ o., ......... .. ~5 £. ~i "'"' u-i;. ""'"" ~yr ~ . u ~ l f le t ! I i 1 ). l L,i s -. ·--' .... 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 644 '-, 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 645 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 646 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 647 EXHIBIT "H'' DISPOSAL SITE 2 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 648 City of Chula Vista Staff Report File#:17-0392, Item#: 18. RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF THE FOLLOWING: David Wynne, Veterans Advisory Commission Judy Gallardo, International Friendship Commission Timothy McMillin, Sustainability Commission City of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 649 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 650 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 651 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 652 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 653 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 654 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 655 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 656 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 657 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 658 23. TheCityunderstands meetingschedules andindividual'savailabilitymaychange. Weaskthatyouconsiderthemeeting schedulewhensubmittinganapplication. IhavereviewedtheVeteransAdvisoryCommissionregularmeetingdate, timeandfrequency. 24. Iamfamiliarwiththeresponsibilities oftheVeteransAdvisoryCommission. IattestthattheinformationIhaveprovidedis accurateandtrue. Thankyou, CityofChulaVista Thisisanautomatedmessagegenerated bytheVisionContentManagement System™. Pleasedonotreplydirectlytothisemail. 3 2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 659 City of Chula Vista Staff Report File#:17-0371, Item#: 19. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL--ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Initiation of litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(4): One (1) Case. City of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 660 City of Chula Vista Staff Report File#:17-0395, Item#: 20. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL--ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2): One (1) Case. City of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 661 City of Chula Vista Staff Report File#:17-0399, Item#: 21. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9 (d)(1) Name of case: City of Chula Vista v. Chula Vista Wellness, et al., San Diego Superior Court Case No. 37-2016- 00014684-CU-MC-CTL City of Chula Vista Printed on 9/7/2017Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™2017-09-12 Agenda Packet Page 662