The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2017-08-15 Agenda PacketAugust 15, 2017City Council Agenda PRESENTATION BY THE GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION OF THE CERTIFICATE OF ACHIEVEMENT FOR EXCELLENCE IN FINANCIAL REPORTING AWARD FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 2016 TO FINANCE DIRECTOR DAVID BILBY 17-0328C.17-0328 INTRODUCTION OF CHULA VISTA’S SISTER CITY, ODAWARA, JAPAN’S AMBASSADORS: CHISATO TAKAHASHI, MINA HANAWA, NOZOMI SETO AND MAKI ANZAI, PARTICIPANTS IN THE ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL FRIENDSHIP COMMISSION’S EXCHANGE PROGRAM; AND A PRESENTATION BY THE CHULA VISTA AMBASSADORS: RAYMOND LEOPOLD RODRIGUEZ, ALEC IVAN CONTRERAS, NEKAYLA DE JESUS TORRALBA AND MATHEW NOEL FERNANDEZ REGARDING THEIR EXPERIENCE IN ODAWARA 17-0350D.17-0350 CONSENT CALENDAR (Items 1 - 4) The Council will enact the Consent Calendar staff recommendations by one motion, without discussion, unless a Councilmember, a member of the public, or staff requests that an item be removed for discussion. If you wish to speak on one of these items, please fill out a “Request to Speak” form (available in the lobby) and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. Items pulled from the Consent Calendar will be discussed immediately following the Consent Calendar. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of June 27, 2017.17-03641.17-0364 Council approve the minutes. Staff Recommendation: ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 8.22.030 TO CLARIFY THAT SMOKING IS PROHIBITED IN ALL CITY PARKS (SECOND READING AND ADOPTION) 17-03552.17-0355 City Attorney & Police Department Department: The activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required. Environmental Notice: Council adopt the ordinance. Staff Recommendation: Page 2 City of Chula Vista Printed on 8/10/2017 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 2 August 15, 2017City Council Agenda A. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING CHAPTER 3.45 OF THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE (MASTER FEE SCHEDULE) (FIRST READING) B. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING CERTAIN SECTIONS OF CHAPTER 1 (GENERAL) OF THE CITY’S MASTER FEE SCHEDULE AND REPEALING CITY COUNCIL POLICIES 200-01 (SPECIFIC CATEGORIES OF DEVELOPMENT PROJECT ASSISTANCE OR FEE SUBSIDIES), 267-05 (WAIVER OF FEES FOR COMMUNITY SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS), AND 861-04 (GREEN FEES AT CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE) 17-03333.17-0333 Development Services Department Department: The activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required. Environmental Notice: Council place the ordinance on first reading and adopt the resolution. Staff Recommendation: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ADOPTING THE CITY’S TRAFFIC SIGNAL COMMUNICATIONS MASTER PLAN 17-03384.17-0338 Engineering Department Department: The Project qualifies for a Statutory Exemption pursuant to Section 15262 (Feasibility and Planning Studies) pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines. Environmental Notice: Council adopt the resolution. Staff Recommendation: ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR PUBLIC COMMENTS Persons speaking during Public Comments may address the Council on any subject matter within the Council’s jurisdiction that is not listed as an item on the agenda. State law generally prohibits the Council from discussing or taking action on any issue not included on the agenda, but, if appropriate, the Council may schedule the topic for future discussion or refer the matter to staff. Comments are limited to three minutes. Page 3 City of Chula Vista Printed on 8/10/2017 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 3 August 15, 2017City Council Agenda ACTION ITEMS The Item(s) listed in this section of the agenda will be considered individually by the Council and are expected to elicit discussion and deliberation. If you wish to speak on any item, please fill out a “Request to Speak” form (available in the lobby) and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. CONSIDERATION OF SELECTING A COMPLIANCE TRACK (1 OR 2) FOR THE NEW TRASH AMENDMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE SAN DIEGO REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD AND NOTIFYING THEM OF THE SELECTION RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO NOTIFY THE SAN DIEGO REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD OF THE TRACK SELECTED TO COMPLY WITH TRASH AMENDMENT INVESTIGATIVE ORDER NO. R9-2017-0077 17-03395.17-0339 Engineering Department Department: The Project qualifies for a Categorical Exemption pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines Section 15301 Class 1 (Existing Facilities) and/or Section 15303 Class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures) Environmental Notice: Council adopt the resolution. Staff Recommendation: CONSIDERATION OF SUPPORTING SENATE BILL 54, THE CALIFORNIA VALUES ACT RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA SUPPORTING SENATE BILL 54, THE CALIFORNIA VALUES ACT 17-01546.17-0154 City Manager, Police Department & City Attorney Department: The activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required. Environmental Notice: Council consider the resolution and take action as Council deems appropriate. Staff Recommendation: CITY MANAGER’S REPORTS MAYOR’S REPORTS Page 4 City of Chula Vista Printed on 8/10/2017 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 4 August 15, 2017City Council Agenda RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ADOPTING THE 2017/2018 LEGISLATIVE PROGRAM (This item was continued from August 8, 2017.) Recommended Action: Council adopt the resolution. 17-02587.17-0258 Ratification of appointment of the following: Anna Cabral, Housing Advisory Commission Edgar Hopida, Charter Review Commission Alexandra Mares, International Friendship Commission Tina Matthias, Sustainability Commission 17-03638.17-0363 COUNCILMEMBERS’ COMMENTS COUNCILMEMBER AGUILAR: CONSIDERATION OF THE FORMATION OF AN AD-HOC SUBCOMMITTEE WITH COUNCILMEMBERS AGUILAR AND PADILLA FOR THE 2017 STARLIGHT PARADE 17-03629.17-0362 CLOSED SESSION Announcements of actions taken in Closed Session shall be made available by noon on Wednesday following the Council Meeting at the City Attorney’s office in accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act (Government Code 54957.7). CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6 Agency designated representatives: Glen Googins, Maria Kachadoorian, Kelley Bacon, Simon Silva, Gary Halbert, Courtney Chase, David Bilby Employee organization: Association of Chula Vista Employees (ACE) 17-035310.17-0353 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL--ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2): Case(s): One (1) 17-027811.17-0278 Page 5 City of Chula Vista Printed on 8/10/2017 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 5 August 15, 2017City Council Agenda A. CITY COUNCIL AND SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9 (d)(1) (This item was continued from 8/8/2017) Names of cases: 1) San Diego County Office of Education, et. al., v. San Diego County, et. al., San Diego Superior Court, Case No 37-2017-00019775-CU-WM-CTL; 2) The Affordable Housing Coalition of San Diego County v. Tracy Sandoval, et. al., Sacramento Superior Court, Case No. 34-2012-80001158-CU-WM-GDS; 3) City of Chula Vista, et.al. v. Tracy Sandoval, et. al., Sacramento Superior Court, Case No. 34-2014- 80001723-CU-WM-GDS B. CITY COUNCIL AND SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL--ANTICIPATED LITIGATION -- Initiation of litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(4): Case(s): One (1) 17-033712.17-0337 Page 6 City of Chula Vista Printed on 8/10/2017 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 6 August 15, 2017City Council Agenda CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9 (d)(1) Name of cases: A. Rudolph Diaz v. City of Chula Vista, et al., San Diego Superior Court, Case No. 37-2014-00016795-CU-OE-CTL; B. John Hess v. Dave Hanneman, et al., United States District Court, Case No. 14-cv-02271-CAB-JMA; C. City of Chula Vista v. Lexington Insurance Co., United States District Court, Case No. 16-cv-01105-BTM-BGS D. Douglas Kalbaugh v. City of Chula Vista, Worker’s Compensation Appeals Board, Case No.s ADJ10459548, ADJ10573765, ADJ10573882 and ADJ10573858 17-029213.17-0292 ADJOURNMENT to the Special City Council Meeting on August 22, 2017 at 4:00 p.m., in the Executive Conference Room; and thence to the Regular City Council Workshop on September 7, 2017, at 6:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers. Materials provided to the City Council related to any open-session item on this agenda are available for public review at the City Clerk’s Office, located in City Hall at 276 Fourth Avenue, Building A, during normal business hours. In compliance with the AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT The City of Chula Vista requests individuals who require special accommodations to access, attend, and/or participate in a City meeting, activity, or service, contact the City Clerk’s Office at (619) 691-5041(California Relay Service is available for the hearing impaired by dialing 711) at least forty-eight hours in advance of the meeting. Most Chula Vista City Council meetings, including public comments, are video recorded and aired live on AT&T U-verse channel 99 (throughout the County), on Cox Cable channel 24 (only in Chula Vista), and online at www.chulavistaca.gov. Recorded meetings are also aired on Wednesdays at 7 p.m. (both channels) and are archived on the City's website. Sign up at www.chulavistaca.gov to receive email notifications when City Council agendas are published online. Page 7 City of Chula Vista Printed on 8/10/2017 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 7 City of Chula Vista Staff Report File#:17-0356, Item#: A. OATH OF OFFICE Theresa Acerro, Mobilehome Rent Review Commission City of Chula Vista Printed on 8/10/2017Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 8 City of Chula Vista Staff Report File#:17-0282, Item#: B. EMPLOYEE SERVICE RECOGNITION HONORING STAFF WITH MILESTONE SERVICE ANNIVERSARIES City of Chula Vista Printed on 8/10/2017Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 9 City of Chula Vista Staff Report File#:17-0328, Item#: C. PRESENTATION BY THE GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION OF THE CERTIFICATE OF ACHIEVEMENT FOR EXCELLENCE IN FINANCIAL REPORTING AWARD FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 2016 TO FINANCE DIRECTOR DAVID BILBY City of Chula Vista Printed on 8/10/2017Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 10 City of Chula Vista Staff Report File#:17-0350, Item#: D. INTRODUCTION OF CHULA VISTA’S SISTER CITY, ODAWARA, JAPAN’S AMBASSADORS: CHISATO TAKAHASHI, MINA HANAWA, NOZOMI SETO AND MAKI ANZAI, PARTICIPANTS IN THE ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL FRIENDSHIP COMMISSION’S EXCHANGE PROGRAM; AND A PRESENTATION BY THE CHULA VISTA AMBASSADORS: RAYMOND LEOPOLD RODRIGUEZ, ALEC IVAN CONTRERAS, NEKAYLA DE JESUS TORRALBA AND MATHEW NOEL FERNANDEZ REGARDING THEIR EXPERIENCE IN ODAWARA City of Chula Vista Printed on 8/10/2017Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 11 City of Chula Vista Staff Report File#:17-0364, Item#: 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of June 27, 2017. RECOMMENDED ACTION Council approve the minutes. City of Chula Vista Printed on 8/10/2017Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 12 City of Chula Vista Meeting Minutes - Draft 5:00 PM Southwestern College Learning Resource Center (LRC) Building 620, Room L238 North & South 900 Otay Lakes Road Chula Vista, CA 91910 Tuesday, June 27, 2017 SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING JOINTLY WITH THE GOVERNING BOARD OF SOUTHWESTERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT CALL TO ORDER A special meeting of the City Council of the City of Chula Vista was called to order at 5:14 p.m. in the Learning Resource Center, located at Southwestern College, Building 620, Room L238 North & South, 900 Otay Lakes Road, Chula Vista, California. ROLL CALL: Present:Councilmember Aguilar, Councilmember Diaz, Deputy Mayor McCann and Mayor Casillas Salas Absent:Councilmember Padilla Also Present: City Manager Halbert, City Attorney Googins, and Assistant City Clerk Bigelow PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG Southwestern Community College District Board President Tim Nader led the Pledge of Allegiance. PRESENTATION 1.17-0272 PRESENTATION BY DR. DIANNE VAN HOOK ON THE UNIVERSITY CENTER AT COLLEGE OF THE CANYONS Dr. Dianne Van Hook, founder of the Dianne Van Hook University Center at College of the Canyons, will give a presentation on how the College of the Canyons brought the Dianne Van Hook University Center to fruition. Dr. Van Hook will present an overview and answer questions. . Southwestern Community College District Superintendent/President Dr. Kindred Murillo introduced Dr. Van Hook. Dr. Van Hook gave a presentation regarding the University Center at College of the Canyons and responded to questions from the Council and Southwestern Community College District Board ("Board"). She distributed written materials to the Council and Board. Discussion ensued regarding the presentation and project. At the request of Mayor Casillas Salas, there was consensus of the Council to work with staff to form a joint working group of the Council and Board to continue to explore the topic. Page 1City of Chula Vista 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 13 June 27, 2017City Council Meeting Minutes - Draft ADJOURNMENT At 7:42 p.m., the meeting was adjourned to the Special City Council Meeting on June 28, 2017, at 5:00 p.m., in the Executive Conference room; and thence to the Regular City Council Meeting on July 11, 2017, at 5:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers. _______________________________ Kerry K. Bigelow, Assistant City Clerk Page 2City of Chula Vista 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 14 City of Chula Vista Staff Report File#:17-0355, Item#: 2. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 8.22.030 TO CLARIFY THAT SMOKING IS PROHIBITED IN ALL CITY PARKS (SECOND READING AND ADOPTION) RECOMMENDED ACTION Council adopt the ordinance. SUMMARY Staff is recommending that City Council adopt an ordinance to clean up contradictory language contained in Chula Vista Municipal Code section 8.22.030 and clarify that smoking is prohibited in all City parks. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Environmental Notice The activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required. Environmental Determination The proposed activity has been reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines because the activity consists of administrative actions that will not result in a physical change to the environment; therefore, pursuant to Section 15060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the activity is not subject to CEQA. BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Not Applicable DISCUSSION Chula Vista Municipal Code Chapter 8.22 regulates smoking in public places and places of employment. Section 8.22.030 contains multiple subsections. Subsections (D) through (G) regulate smoking in City parks. These subsections were added and amended on several occasions throughout 2006 and 2007. Ordinance 3043 was adopted in 2006; it added 8.22.030(D), which prohibits smoking in Friendship Park. Ordinance 3044 added 8.22.030(E), which prohibits smoking in Independence Park and Rancho Del Ray Park. Ordinance 3045 was also enacted in 2006; it added a section (F) stating “No person shall smoke in any portion of any other City park not specifically designated in this section.” In 2007, section 8.22.030 was again amended through Ordinance 3058. Ordinance 3058 made several changes to chapter 8.22, including prohibiting smoking within 50 feet of an entrance to an City of Chula Vista Printed on 8/10/2017Page 1 of 2 powered by Legistar™2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 15 File#:17-0355, Item#: 2. several changes to chapter 8.22, including prohibiting smoking within 50 feet of an entrance to an eating establishment and renumbering section 8.22.030 to accommodate additional prohibitions and clean up existing language. Unfortunately, the amended version of 8.22.030 itself contains conflicting provisions. While section 8.22.030 (D) through (F) now prohibit smoking in Friendship Park, Independence Park, Rancho del Rey Park, Memorial Park, and Discovery Park, subsection (G) then reads “No person shall smoke in any portion of all City parks except Friendship Park, Independence Park, Rancho del Rey Park, Memorial Park, and Discovery Park”. As a result, Section 8.22.030 (G) conflicts with and appears to override subsections (D) through (F). Staff now recommend that Chula Vista Municipal Code section 8.22.030 be amended to remove the contradictory language currently contained in 8.22.030 subsections (D) through (G), and to replace those provisions with a single subsection clarifying that smoking is prohibited in all City parks. DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT Staff has reviewed the decision contemplated by this action and has determined that it is not site- specific and consequently, the 500-foot rule found in California Code of Regulations Title 2, section 18702.2(a)(11), is not applicable to this decision for purposes of determining a disqualifying real property-related financial conflict of interest under the Political Reform Act (Cal. Gov't Code § 87100, et seq.). Staff is not independently aware, and has not been informed by any City Councilmember, of any other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter. LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS The City’s Strategic Plan has five major goals: Operational Excellence, Economic Vitality, Healthy Community, Strong and Secure Neighborhoods and a Connected Community. The amendment of section 8.22.030 supports the Operational Excellence and Healthy Community goals as it removes confusing and contradictory language in the Municipal Code and protects public health by affirming that smoking is prohibited in all City parks. CURRENT YEAR FISCAL IMPACT The subject amendment to section 8.22.030 results in no current year fiscal impact to the City. ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT The subject amendment to section 8.22.030 results in no ongoing fiscal impact to the City. ATTACHMENTS 1. Section 8.22.030 2. Section 8.22.030 strike out underline version Staff Contact: Glen Googins; Megan McClurg; Lieutenant Henry Martin City of Chula Vista Printed on 8/10/2017Page 2 of 2 powered by Legistar™2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 16 SECOND READING AND ADOPTION ORDINANCE NO. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 8.22.030 TO CLARIFY THAT SMOKING IS PROHIBITED IN ALL CITY PARKS WHEREAS, the smoking of tobacco, or any other weed or plant, is a danger to public health; and WHEREAS, secondhand smoke has been repeatedly identified as a health hazard by the U.S. Surgeon General, California Air Resources Board, and California Environmental Protection Agency; and WHEREAS, exposure to secondhand smoke anywhere has negative health impacts, and exposure to secondhand smoke occurs at significant levels outdoors; and WHEREAS, Chula Vista Municipal Code chapter 8.22 regulates smoking in public places and places of employment; and WHEREAS, Chula Vista Municipal Code section 8.22.030 currently contains an internal contradiction wherein sub-sections (D) through (E) prohibit persons from smoking in specific City parks, but sub-section (G) exempts those same City parks from said prohibition; and WHEREAS, it is in the best interests of the City to amend Chula Vista Municipal Code to section 8.22.030 to correct the internal contradiction and clarify that smoking is prohibited in all City parks; NOW THEREFORE the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does ordain as follows: SECTION I A.Chapter 8, Section 8.22.030 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code regarding the prohibitions on smoking in City parks is amended to read as follows: 8.22.030 Prohibitions. A. No person shall smoke in a public place or place of employment, except in designated smoking areas. B. No person shall smoke in the dining area of any restaurant or establishment where people eat, including outdoor patios, outdoor bars that serve food, or any covered eating area. C. No person shall smoke within 50 feet of any entrance to any restaurant or establishment where people eat. D. No person shall smoke in any portion of any City park. 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 17 Ordinance Page 2 SECTION II Severability If any portion of this Ordinance, or its application to any person or circumstance, is for any reason held to be invalid, unenforceable or unconstitutional, by a court of competent jurisdiction, that portion shall be deemed severable, and such invalidity, unenforceability or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining portions of the Ordinance, or its application to any other person or circumstance. The City Council of the City of Chula Vista hereby declares that it would have adopted each section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance, irrespective of the fact that any one or more other sections, sentences, clauses or phrases of the Ordinance be declared invalid, unenforceable or unconstitutional. SECTION III Construction The City Council of the City of Chula Vista intends this Ordinance to supplement, not to duplicate or contradict, applicable state and federal law and this Ordinance shall be construed in light of that intent. SECTION IV Effective Date This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force on the thirtieth day after its final passage. SECTION V Publication The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published or posted according to law. Presented by Approved as to form by _____________________________________ ____________________________________ Glen R. Googins Glen R. Googins City Attorney City Attorney 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 18 Chula Vista Municipal Code Page 1/1 The Chula Vista Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 3406, passed June 13, 2017. 8.22.030 Prohibitions. A. No person shall smoke in a public place or place of employment, except in designated smoking areas. B. No person shall smoke in the dining area of any restaurant or establishment where people eat, including outdoor patios, outdoor bars that serve food, or any covered eating area. C. No person shall smoke within 50 feet of any entrance to any restaurant or establishment where people eat. D. No person shall smoke in any portion of any City park. 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 19 Chula Vista Municipal Code Page 1/1 The Chula Vista Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 3406, passed June 13, 2017. 8.22.030 Prohibitions. A. No person shall smoke in a public place or place of employment, except in designated smoking areas. B. No person shall smoke in the dining area of any restaurant or establishment where people eat, including outdoor patios, outdoor bars that serve food, or any covered eating area. C. No person shall smoke within 50 feet of any entrance to any restaurant or establishment where people eat. D. No person shall smoke in any portion of any City park. Friendship Park. E. No person shall smoke in any portion of Independence Park and Rancho del Rey Park. F. No person shall smoke in any portion of Memorial Park and Discovery Park. G. No person shall smoke in any portion of all City parks except Friendship Park, Independence Park, Rancho del Rey Park, Memorial Park, and Discovery Park. (Ord. 3058 § 1, 2007; Ord. 3046 § 1, 2006; Ord. 3045 § 1, 2006; Ord. 3044 § 1, 2006; Ord. 3043 § 1, 2006; Ord. 3035, 2006; Ord. 2086 § 1, 1984). 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 20 City of Chula Vista Staff Report File#:17-0333, Item#: 3. A. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING CHAPTER 3.45 OF THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE (MASTER FEE SCHEDULE) (FIRST READING) B. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING CERTAIN SECTIONS OF CHAPTER 1 (GENERAL) OF THE CITY’S MASTER FEE SCHEDULE AND REPEALING CITY COUNCIL POLICIES 200-01 (SPECIFIC CATEGORIES OF DEVELOPMENT PROJECT ASSISTANCE OR FEE SUBSIDIES), 267-05 (WAIVER OF FEES FOR COMMUNITY SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS), AND 861-04 (GREEN FEES AT CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE) RECOMMENDED ACTION Council place the ordinance on first reading and adopt the resolution. SUMMARY The City regularly receives requests for fee waivers. Per the Chula Vista Municipal Code and the City’s Master Fee Schedule, the City Manager’s authority to waive fees is limited to the greater of $2,500 or 25% of the fee imposed per the Schedule. Larger fee waivers require Council action. In order to increase efficiency and timeliness in responding to minor fee waiver requests, an increase in the City Manager’s fee waiver authority from $2,500 to $7,500 is recommended. Additional guidance regarding fee waivers is provided in various City Council Policies. Repeal of these policies and consolidation of all fee waiver authority and guidance in the Master Fee Schedule is also recommended. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Environmental Notice The activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required. Environmental Determination The Director of Development Services has reviewed the proposed activity for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that this activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines because it will not result in a physical change to the environment; therefore, pursuant to Section 15060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Thus, no environmental review is required. BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Not Applicable. City of Chula Vista Printed on 8/10/2017Page 1 of 3 powered by Legistar™2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 21 File#:17-0333, Item#: 3. DISCUSSION The Master Fee Schedule (“Schedule”) is a centralized listing of fees charged by the City for services, administrative acts, and other legally required fees. The Schedule and Chapter 3.45 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code both include provisions for fee reductions, waivers, deferrals, or a combination thereof (generally “waivers”), and identify a Waiving Authority based upon the amount of waiver requested. For waivers less than or equal to the greater of $2,500 or 25% of the fee imposed, Waiving Authority is vested in the City Manager, or their designee. For fee waivers in excess of this threshold, City Council approval is required. Waivers by both the City Manager and the City Council require a public hearing (unpublished, but directly noticed to interested parties). The dollar limit on the City Manager’s Waiver Authority was established via Ordinance 2506 in 1992, and has remained unchanged since that time. Preparing a fee waiver request for Council consideration requires significant staff expense and approximately three weeks to process. Increasing the City Manager’s waiver authority from $2,500 to $7,500 will reduce the number of fee waivers requiring Council action. Delegating this additional authority to the City Manager will reduce General Fund costs and improve the City’s ability to respond to minor fee waiver requests in a timely manner. Further efficiencies are gained by removing the public hearing requirement. Notice to interested parties will continue to be provided. Controls to ensure transparency and fairness are also proposed. A maximum annual City Manager waiver amount per organization of $7,500 is recommended, with each school site considered an organization for purposes of the cap. Organizations requesting annual waivers in excess of $7,500 would require Council approval. Transparency and accountability will be achieved through an annual accounting to the City Council of the fees waived by the City Manager, to be provided in conjunction with the regular fourth quarter financial report. Waiver decisions by the City Manager will be appealable to the City Council. Decisions by the City Council will be considered final. Fee Waiver Authority & Guidance Consolidation The City has adopted a number of documents addressing the issue of fee waivers, including the previously described language in the Schedule and Municipal Code. Additional guidance can be found in the City Council’s Policy Manual (Policies 200-01, 267-05, and 861-04, see Attachments 1 through 3). Establishing fee waiver authority in multiple documents may lead to confusion and inconsistency. In order to reduce future confusion and errors, consolidating all fee waiver authority and guidance to the Master Fee Schedule (Attachment 4) and repealing the above referenced City Council Policies is recommended. Master Fee Schedule Administrative Update Authority Additional edits to explicitly authorize staff to make minor administrative updates to Chapter 1 of the Master Fee Schedule are also recommended. For ease of reference, Chapter 1 provides data and rates that are not subject to approval of the City Council, but that may impact fee payers. For purposes of determining eligibility for low income fee programs, the Master Fee Schedule details the 80% level of median family income for the San Diego Metropolitan Statistical Area, as determined by the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Allowing staff to administratively update the income rates listed will ensure current information is provided to the public. Similarly, the City Council does not take action to approve the City’s fully burdened hourly rates. Allowing staff to administratively update the Master Fee Schedule to reflect current rates supports transparency in the City of Chula Vista Printed on 8/10/2017Page 2 of 3 powered by Legistar™2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 22 File#:17-0333, Item#: 3. City’s full cost recovery billing. DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT Staff has reviewed the decision contemplated by this action and has determined that it is not site- specific and consequently, the 500-foot rule found in California Code of Regulations Title 2, section 18702.2(a)(11), is not applicable to this decision for purposes of determining a disqualifying real property-related financial conflict of interest under the Political Reform Act (Cal. Gov't Code § 87100, et seq.). Staff is not independently aware, and has not been informed by any City Council member, of any other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter. LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS The City’s Strategic Plan has five major goals: Operational Excellence, Economic Vitality, Healthy Community, Strong and Secure Neighborhoods and a Connected Community. Standardizing and consolidating fee waiver authority and increasing the authority delegated to the City Manager supports the Operational Excellence goal by increasing efficiency. It also supports the Connected Community goal by reducing barriers to community organizations seeking fee waivers. CURRENT YEAR FISCAL IMPACT No appropriations are recommended in conjunction with this item. Increasing the City Manager’s fee waiver authority streamlines the waiver process, increasing efficiency and reducing staff costs. Actual impacts will vary based upon the number of fee waivers that would have required Council action but that are now processed administratively. ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT Increasing the City Manager’s fee waiver authority streamlines the waiver process, increasing efficiency and reducing staff costs. Actual impacts will vary based upon the number of fee waivers that would have required Council action but that are now processed administratively. Annual reports to the City Council of fee waivers approved will ensure a transparent process and provide an opportunity for the City Council to provide additional guidance regarding administrative approval of fee waivers in the future. ATTACHMENTS 1. City Council Policy 200-01: Specific Categories of Development Project Assistance or Fee Subsidies 2. City Council Policy 267-05: Waiver of Fees for Community Service Organizations 3. City Council Policy 861-04: Green Fees at Chula Vista Municipal Golf Course 4. Redline Master Fee Schedule Section 1-100 (General - Introduction) Staff Contact: Tiffany Allen, Development Services Department City of Chula Vista Printed on 8/10/2017Page 3 of 3 powered by Legistar™2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 23 J COUNCIL POLICY CITY OF CHUTA VISTA SUBJECT: SPECIFIC CATEGORIES OF DEVELOPMENT POLICY FsFFECTIVE PROJECT' ASSISTANCE OR FEE SUBSIDIES NUMBER DATE PAGE 200-01 OS-11-93 1 OF 3 ADOPTED BY: Resolution No. 17086/RDA No. 1324 DATED: OS-11-93 BACKGROUND At a joint City Council/Redevelopment Agency meeting on May 11, 1993, the City Council and Redevelopment Agency approved the establishment of a policy on specific categories of development project assistance or fee subsidies to address certain impacts of the Master Fee Schedule update which was completed on Mazch 23, 1993. PURPOSE Establishing a policy for special consideration of various impacu of city fees. POLICY A Category I. Very I.ow-Income Residential For residential development proposals of less than twenty (20) dwelling units which 1. Are not part of a Planned Community development 2. Consist of new construction or major refurbishment (remodeling valued at or above 125,000) 3. Are determined by the city to serve Yery Low-Income housing needs (not in excess of 50% of median income), according to the median azea income statistics compiled annually by the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for the San Diego meh~opolitan area, A grant of 25% of the total fees far each Very I.ow-Income unit for: 1. Electrical Permits 2. Plumbing Pezmits 3. Building Permits may be provided by the City against the cost of said fees. Depending upon funding availability and qualifications, said grant may be provided from the Redevelopment Agency Low•Moderate Income Housing Fund and/or Home Investrnent Partnership funds. Otherwise, said grant would take the form of a subsidy of that portion of the fees, with the associated cosu absorbed by the General Fund. On a case-by-case basis, if the City or Agency or Chula Vista Housing Authority determines that other incentives, subsidies or assistance of similar or greater value may be snore appropriate, said incentives, subsidies or assistance may be provided in lieu of the aforementioned grant. Whenever such a determination is made, it shall be subject to all applicable ordinances, policies and procedures -including those regazding authority to grant fee waivers and approve development agreements. No such assistance shall be granted absent some form of written agreement and/or compliance measures assuring to the citl~s satisfaction that dte project in question will indeed meet the identified housing needs. - 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 24 ii ~I~N~PO~~ uC1TYOFCHLJLAVLSl'A SUBIECT: SPECIFIC CATEGORIES OF DEVELOPMENT 1'OI.dCl' 1~IYVEPROJECTASSISTANCEORFEESUBSIDIESN[J]yjB~ DATE PAGE 200-01 OS-11-93 2 OF 3 ADOPTED BY: Resolution No. 17086/RDA No. 1324 DATED: OS-11-93 B. Category II. Lower-Income Residential For residential development proposals of less than twenty (20) dwelling units which 1. Are not part of a Planned Community development2. Consist of new construction or major trfiubishmmt (rmodeling valued at or above S2S,000)3. Are determined by the city to serve Lowaz-Income housing needs (not in excess of 60% of medianincome), according to the median azea income statistics compiled annually by the federalDepartmentofHousingandUrbanDevelopment (HUD) for the San Diego metropolitan azea, A grant of 10% of the total fees for each Lower-Income unit for: 1. Electrical Permits 2. Plumbing Permits 3. Building Permits may be provided by the City against the cost of said fees. Depending upon funding availability andqualifications, said grant may be provided from the Redevelopment Agency Low-Moderate IncomeHousingFundand/or Home Investment Partnership funds. Otherwise, said grant would take the formofasubsidyof that portion of the fees, with the associated costs absorbed by the General Fund. On a case-by-case basis, if the City or Agency or Chula Vista Housing Authority determines that otherincentives, subsidies or assistance of similaz or greater value may be more appropriate, said incentives,subsidies or assistance may be provided in lieu of the aforementioned grant. Whenever such a determination is made, it shall be subject to all applicable ordinances, policies andprocedures, including those regazding authority to grant fee waivers, and approval of developmentagreements. No such assistance shall be granted absent some form of written agreement and/orcompliancemeasuresassuringtothecity~s satisfaction that the project in question wr71 indeed meet dreidentifiedhousingneeds. C. Category III. Residential Improvemmts/Fapansion (General) For improvements to or expansions of existing residential dwelling units which do not increase thenumberofEquivalentDwellingUnits (EDUs) and which do not come under the purview of Category IorII, No special consideration of fees shall be given to such projects and any fee waiver requests shallbeprocessedaccordingtothecurrentfeewaiverordinanceand/or policies. 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 25 COUNCII, POI ICY CITY OF CI-ILJLA VISTA SUBJECT: SPECIFIC CATEGORIES OF DEVELOPMENT POLICY EFFECI~IVE PROJECT ASSISTANCE OR FEE SUBSIDIES NUMBER DATE PAGE 200-01 OS-11-93 3 OF 3 ADOPTED BY: Resolution No. 17086/RDA No. 1324 DATED: OS-11-93 D. Category 1V. Busineas (General) No special consideration of fees shall be given to such projects and any fee waiver requests shall be processed according to the current fee waiver ordinance and/or policies. E. Granting Authority The City Council and Redevelopment Agency hereby delegate the authority to the City Manager to make such grants or authorize such assistance pureLnt to this policy as may be less the 62,500, upon giving an informational memo to the Counc~ and/or Agency. If the amount of the grant or assistance is in e=cess of 62,500, said grant or assistance shall be subject to rnnsideration by the Councl and/or Agency, depending on the funding sources of the asiistance. 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 26 J i i COUNCII. POLICY CITY OF CHULA VISTA SUBJECT: WAIVER OF FEES FOR COMMUNITY SERVICE POLICY EFFECTIVE ORGANIZATIONS NUMBER DATE PAGE 267-OS 11-24-87 1 OF 1 ADOPTED BY: Resolution No. 13360 DATED: 11-24-87 BACKGROUND The lack of an established Council Policy delineating the criteria for waiver of fees by nonprofit entities has raised the need for a policy that will govern such waivers requested by nonprofit organizations. It is considered appropriate to waive fees imposed by the City for those organizations which meet the criteria established by this policy. PURPOSE To establish a standard policy by which nonprofit organization may be exempt from those fees established and imposed by the City. POLICY Fees established and imposed by the City may be waived for nonprofit organizations where the City Council determines that the value of the public service performed by the organization merits the waiver of fees. 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 27 i COUNCII. POLICY CITY OF CHULA VISTA SUBJECT: GREEN FEES AT CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL POLICY EFFECTIVE GOLF couRSE NUMBER DATE PAGE 861-04 06-10-75 1 OF 1 ADOPTED BY: Resolution No. 7778 DATED: 06-1U-75 BACKGROUND The City Council desires to provide an equitable policy for the disposition of requests for the waiver of green fees at the Chula Vista Municipal Golf Course by various organizations conducting money-raising tournaments. PURPOSE The Director of Parks and Recreation authorized and directed to give every assistance to all civic and charitable organizations in the arrangement of fund-raising tournaments at the Chula Vista Municipal Golf Course. POLICY City of Chula Vista has determined and reaffirms the total waiver of green fees at the Chula Vista Municipal Golf Course for the following tournaments: 1. Local high school and college tournaments 2. Chula Vista Junior Golf Championship Tournament 3. San Diego County P.G.A. Pro/Am Toumament The staff is directed to make appropriate arrangements for dates and times of such tournaments mutually beneficial to the City and the organizations. 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 28 MASTER FEE SCHEDULE FEE BULLETIN Chapter 1 - General 1-100 Introduction City of Chula Vista Finance Department 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 91910 May August 20107 City of Chula Vista www.chulavistaca.gov 619.691.5250 GENERAL Section 3.42.010 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code states that the City Council shall adopt, by resolution, a Master Fee Schedule, indicating therein the fees for all services, administrative acts and other legally required fees, which resolution may be amended from time to time and shall be effective upon first reading and approval; provided, however, such resolutions may specify therein their applicability, if any, to applications currently in the process of review. A copy of the Master Fee Schedule shall be maintained in the office of the City Clerk and in each department of the City. Print copies of the Master Fee Schedule may be purchased. Fee per printed schedule .............................. $6.00 DELINQUENT PAYMENT Unless otherwise specified by ordinance, resolution, Master Fee Schedule or invoice, a payment shall be considered delinquent or late if it is not received within thirty (30) days of billing. Delinquent payments shall be subject to the Delinquent Payment Penalty detailed in Fee Bulletin 13-100. FEE WAIVERS The fees set forth in the Master Fee Schedule may be waived or deferred, in whole or in part, by the Waiving Authority, as defined herein below: Waiving Authority, as the term is used herein, shall mean the City Manager, or designee, if the amount of such waiver is less than or equal to the greater of (1) $7,500 or (2) 25% of the fee imposed by the Master Fee Schedule. If the amount of the waiver is greater than the greater of $7,500 or 25% off the original fee imposed by the Master Fee Schedule, the Waiving Authority, as used herein shall mean the City Council. Further, the Waiving Authority for cumulative waivers to a single applicant within a 12 month period in excess of $7,500 shall mean the City Council. For purposes of this provision, each school site shall be considered a separate applicant. , in accordance with the following procedures: Any person requesting a reduction, waiver or deferral, or a combination thereof, of a fee herein charged shall request said adjustment in writing, addressed to the Waiving Authority, and shall set forth therein, with specificity, the reasons for requesting said abatement of all or any portion of the fees. The Waiving Authority shall conduct a public hearing, notice of which is not required to be published. Notice of said public hearing shall be given to the applicant and to any party or parties requesting notice of same. Prior to adjusting all or any portion of a fee established in the master fee schedule, the Waiving Authority shall make at least one of the following findingsfind that either: (1) the fee, when applied in the particular case under review, would require the applicant to pay an amount which is significantly and disproportionately larger than other fee payers given the rights of enjoyment of, or benefits of, the facility or program for which the fee is paid, or (2) the applicant will suffer a peculiar economic hardship or other injustice from the payment of the fee which outweighs, when balanced against, the need of the City for revenue and the need for a uniform method of recovering same from those against whom it is imposed. 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 29 May August 20107 MASTER FEE SCHEDULE  FEE BULLETIN 1-100 Page 2 of 3 City of Chula Vista www.chulavistaca.gov 619.691.5250 (3) the applicant is a nonprofit organization and the value of public service performed by the organization merits the waiver requested. The Waiving Authority shall issue a notice of decision, including imposition ofimpose such terms and conditions on the adjustment waiver as deemed appropriate. , and shall given dDue consideration shall be given to terms and conditions involving interest on amount deferred and, security to assure the eventual collection. Decisions of the City Manager, or designee, as Waiving Authority shall be subject to appeal to the City Council. Applicants wishing to make such an appeal must submit their request in writing to the City Clerk, within ten (10) business days of issuance of the City Manager’s notice of decision. The appeal shall be addressed to the City Council, and shall set forth therein, with specificity, the reasons for requesting said appeal of the City Manager’s decision. The City Council shall consider the appeal within 60 days of filing, or as soon thereafter as practical. Decisions of the City Council as Waiving Authority shall be deemed final. In no instance will lost revenues resulting from a fee waiver be recouped from other fee payers. Impacts to enterprise funds will be offset using discretionary funds. Waiving Authority, as the term is used herein, shall mean the City Manager, or his designee, if the amount of such waiver is less than or equal to the greater of (1) $2,500 or (2) 25% of the fee imposed by the Master Fee Schedule. If the amount of the waiver is greater than the greater of $2,500 or 25% off the original fee imposed by the Master Fee Schedule, the Waiving Authority, as used herein shall mean the City Council. LOW INCOME HOUSEHOLDS Eligibility for City programs or fee schedules restricted to low income households shall be based on the 80% level of median family income for the San Diego Metropolitan Statistical Area as determined annually by the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and detailed below: NO. IN HOUSEHOLD MAXIMUM ANNUAL FAMILY INCOME (Gross for Eligibility) 1 $46,25050,950 2 $52,90058,200 3 $59,50065,600 4 $66,10072,750 5 $71,40078,600 6 $76,70084,400 7 $81,95090,250 8 $8796,250050 An additional $1,000 annual income allowed for each additional person in household in excess of eight (8). [2009 2017 HUD Median Income Data, effective 0304/1917/0917] The maximum annual family income rates are not adopted by the City Council and are provided in the Master Fee Schedule for informational purposes only. Rates listed in the Master Fee Schedule may be updated administratively based upon HUD action without Council approval. COST RECOVERY The Master Fee Schedule reports fees for services that are provided to our citizens and visitors. The cost of providing these services includes both direct staff costs and various support and overhead costs. Fees that do not recover the full cost of providing services result in a subsidy which shifts funds away from critical, high priority needs such as public safety initiatives and infrastructure maintenance. In November 1982 the City Council adopted Resolution 11063 adopting a policy of full cost recovery, under which both the direct and overhead costs associated with providing public services are identified and, when possible, recovered. To facilitate this process, City staff annually develops a set of fully burdened hourly rates (FBHR), providing a convenient method for calculating the full costs of services. A discussion 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 30 May August 20107 MASTER FEE SCHEDULE  FEE BULLETIN 1-100 Page 3 of 3 City of Chula Vista www.chulavistaca.gov 619.691.5250 of the costs included in the calculation of the FBHR, as well as the current fiscal year rate for each classification in the City is detailed in Fee Bulletin 1-200. The City’s fully burdened rates serve as a basis for identifying the true cost of providing services, calculating fixed fee levels, and understanding the fiscal impacts of fee subsidies. The City’s fully burdened rates are not subject to annual Council adoption and are included in the Master Fee Schedule for informational purposes only. Rates may be updated administratively without additional Council action. Please contact the Finance Department to confirm current rates. 1. Full Cost Recovery Deposits Significant variances in staff time required to provide certain services make application of a fixed fee schedule impracticable. In these instances, the applicant is charged for services provided on a reimbursement basis, using the fully burdened hourly staff rates. These reimbursement based fees are designated in the Master Fee Schedule as “full cost recovery”. Initial Deposit For each such fee, an initial deposit is required. The average initial deposit amount, or an initial deposit schedule, is provided in the Master Fee Schedule for each full cost recovery deposit based fee. In all instances, the department shall determine the appropriate deposit for each application and shall attempt to limit that deposit to a reasonable amount. Additional Deposits If, at any time, it appears that the deposit amount will be insufficient to cover accumulated City costs, the applicant shall deposit additional amounts as required by the Department Head. Consultant Services If the City determines that consultants are required to assist in the processing of any permit, the City reserves the right to retain and pay such consultants from fees collected from the applicant. Release of Deposit Any funds remaining on deposit at the time of the completion or withdrawal of the application shall be returned to the depositor, after accounting for expenses, including overhead, incurred to date. 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 31 ORDINANCE NO. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING CHAPTER 3.45 OF THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE (MASTER FEE SCHEDULE) WHEREAS, Section 3.45.10 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code (Master Fee Schedule; Established – Purpose) establishes waiver authority for fees set forth in the Master Fee Schedule; and WHEREAS, the same waiver authority is established in Chapter 1 (General) of the City’s Master Fee Schedule itself; and WHEREAS, multiple points of legislative authority may lead to confusion and inconsistency in application; and WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to consolidate all fee waiver authority in Chapter 1 of the Master Fee Schedule. NOW THEREFORE the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does ordain as follows: Section I. Chapter 3.45, Section 3.45.010, of the Chula Vista Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 3.45.010 Established – Purpose. A. The City Council shall adopt, by resolution, a master fee schedule, indicating therein the fees for all services, administrative acts and other legally required fees, which resolution may be amended from time to time and shall be effective upon first reading and approval; provided, however, such resolutions may specify therein their applicability, if any, to applications currently in the process of review. B. A copy of the master fee schedule shall be maintained in the office of the City Clerk and in each department of the City. C. The fees set forth in the master fee schedule may be waived by the waiving authority, as defined in, and pursuant to the provisions of, the master fee schedule, as may be amended from time to time by resolution of the City Council. 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 32 Ordinance Page 2 Section II. Severability If any portion of this Ordinance, or its application to any person or circumstance, is for any reason held to be invalid, unenforceable or unconstitutional, by a court of competent jurisdiction, that portion shall be deemed severable, and such invalidity, unenforceability or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining portions of the Ordinance, or its application to any other person or circumstance. The City Council of the City of Chula Vista hereby declares that it would have adopted each section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance, irrespective of the fact that any one or more other sections, sentences, clauses or phrases of the Ordinance be declared invalid, unenforceable or unconstitutional. Section III. Construction The City Council of the City of Chula Vista intends this Ordinance to supplement, not to duplicate or contradict, applicable state and federal law and this Ordinance shall be construed in light of that intent. Section IV. Effective Date This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force on the thirtieth day after its final passage. Section V. Publication The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published or posted according to law. Presented by Approved as to form by _____________________________________ ____________________________________ Kelly G. Broughton,FASLA Glen R. Googins Director of Development Services City Attorney 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 33 RESOLUTION NO. __________ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING CERTAIN SECTIONS OF CHAPTER 1 (GENERAL) OF THE CITY’S MASTER FEE SCHEDULE AND REPEALING CITY COUNCIL POLICIES 200-01 (SPECIFIC CATEGORIES OF DEVELOPMENT PROJECT ASSISTANCE OR FEE SUBSIDIES), 267-05 (WAIVER OF FEES FOR COMMUNITY SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS), AND 861-04 (GREEN FEES AT CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE) WHEREAS, Chapter 1 (General) of the City’s Master Fee Schedule establishes authority for the waiver or deferral of fees set forth in the Schedule, in whole or in part; and WHEREAS, in order to increase efficiency and timeliness in responding to minor fee waiver requests, the Council wishes to amend Chapter 1 (General) of the City’s Master Fee Schedule, as set forth in Exhibit 1, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as if set forth in full; and WHEREAS, an annual accounting of all fee waivers authorized by the City Manager, or designee, shall be presented to the City Council in conjunction with the fiscal year-end financial statement required pursuant to Section 504(f) of the City’s Charter; and WHEREAS, Chapter 1 (General) of the City’s Master Fee Schedule lists the thresholds for 80% of median family income for the San Diego Metropolitan Statistical Area as determined annually by the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), for purposes of determining eligibility for low income restricted fee schedules; and WHEREAS, HUD median family income data is not subject to City Council approval and is provided in the City’s Master Fee Schedule for informational purposes only; and WHEREAS, amending Chapter 1 (General) of the City’s Master Fee Schedule to reflect current HUD median family income rates and authorizing administrative updates is recommended to improve transparency and efficiency; and WHEREAS, Chapter 1 (General) of the City’s Master Fee Schedule describes the City’s use of fully burdened hourly rates for cost recovery; and WHEREAS, the City’s fully burdened rates are not subject to annual Council adoption and are included in the Master Fee Schedule for informational purposes only; and WHEREAS, amending Chapter 1 (General) of the City’s Master Fee Schedule to explicitly authorize administrative updates to reflect current fully burdened hourly rates is recommended to improve transparency and efficiency; and 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 34 WHEREAS, City Council Policy 200-01 (Specific Categories of Development Project Assistance or Fee Subsidies) was adopted in 1993 to establish a policy on specific categories of development project assistance or fee subsidies to address certain impacts of the Master Fee Schedule update which was completed on March 23, 1993; and WHEREAS, City Council Policy 200-01 establishes a program of electrical, plumbing, and building permit fee grants and waivers available to low income and very low income residential development projects of 25% and 10%, respectively; and WHEREAS, City Council Policy 267-05 (Waiver of Fees for Community Service Organizations) was adopted in 1987 to establish a standard policy by which nonprofit organizations may be exempt from those fees established and imposed by the City; and WHEREAS, City Council Policy 267-05 provides that the fees established and imposed by the City may be waived for nonprofit organizations where the City Council determines that the value of the public service performed by the organization merits the waiver of the fees; and WHEREAS, City Council Policy 861-04 (Green Fees at Chula Vista Municipal Golf Course) was adopted in 1975 to provide an equitable policy for the disposition of requests for the waiver of green fees at the Chula Vista Municipal Golf Course by various organizations conducting money-raising tournaments; and WHEREAS, City Council Policy 861-04 determined and affirmed the total waiver of green fees at the Chula Vista Municipal Golf Course for the following tournaments: local high school and college tournaments; Chula Vista Junior Golf Championship Tournament; and San Diego County P.G.A. Pro/Am Tournament; and WHEREAS, multiple policy documents addressing the issue of fee waivers, deferrals, and grants is inefficient and leads to confusion; and WHEREAS, all fee waiver, deferral, and grant discussions have been consolidated in Chapter 1 (General) of the City’s Master Fee Schedule. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, that it amends certain sections of Chapter 1 (General) of the City’s Master Fee Schedule as set forth in Exhibit 1, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as if set forth in full, effective with the second reading and adoption of Ordinance No. _____, the companion ordinance amending Chapter 3.45 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code (Master Fee Schedule). BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, that it repeals City Council Policy 200-01 (Specific Categories of Development Project Assistance or Fee Subsidies), City Council Policy 267-05 (Waiver of Fees for Community Service Organizations), and City Council Policy 861-04 (Green Fees at Chula Vista Municipal Golf Course). Presented by Approved as to form by 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 35 Resolution No. Page 3 Kelly G. Broughton, FASLA Glen R. Googins Director of Development Services City Attorney 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 36 MASTER FEE SCHEDULE FEE BULLETIN Chapter 1 - General 1-100 Introduction City of Chula Vista Finance Department 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 91910 May August 20107 City of Chula Vista www.chulavistaca.gov 619.691.5250 GENERAL Section 3.42.010 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code states that the City Council shall adopt, by resolution, a Master Fee Schedule, indicating therein the fees for all services, administrative acts and other legally required fees, which resolution may be amended from time to time and shall be effective upon first reading and approval; provided, however, such resolutions may specify therein their applicability, if any, to applications currently in the process of review. A copy of the Master Fee Schedule shall be maintained in the office of the City Clerk and in each department of the City. Print copies of the Master Fee Schedule may be purchased. Fee per printed schedule .............................. $6.00 DELINQUENT PAYMENT Unless otherwise specified by ordinance, resolution, Master Fee Schedule or invoice, a payment shall be considered delinquent or late if it is not received within thirty (30) days of billing. Delinquent payments shall be subject to the Delinquent Payment Penalty detailed in Fee Bulletin 13-100. FEE WAIVERS The fees set forth in the Master Fee Schedule may be waived or deferred, in whole or in part, by the Waiving Authority, as defined herein below: Waiving Authority, as the term is used herein, shall mean the City Manager, or designee, if the amount of such waiver is less than or equal to the greater of (1) $7,500 or (2) 25% of the fee imposed by the Master Fee Schedule. If the amount of the waiver is greater than the greater of $7,500 or 25% off the original fee imposed by the Master Fee Schedule, the Waiving Authority, as used herein shall mean the City Council. Further, the Waiving Authority for cumulative waivers to a single applicant within a 12 month period in excess of $7,500 shall mean the City Council. For purposes of this provision, each school site shall be considered a separate applicant. , in accordance with the following procedures: Any person requesting a reduction, waiver or deferral, or a combination thereof, of a fee herein charged shall request said adjustment in writing, addressed to the Waiving Authority, and shall set forth therein, with specificity, the reasons for requesting said abatement of all or any portion of the fees. The Waiving Authority shall conduct a public hearing, notice of which is not required to be published. Notice of said public hearing shall be given to the applicant and to any party or parties requesting notice of same. Prior to adjusting all or any portion of a fee established in the master fee schedule, the Waiving Authority shall make at least one of the following findingsfind that either: (1) the fee, when applied in the particular case under review, would require the applicant to pay an amount which is significantly and disproportionately larger than other fee payers given the rights of enjoyment of, or benefits of, the facility or program for which the fee is paid, or (2) the applicant will suffer a peculiar economic hardship or other injustice from the payment of the fee which outweighs, when balanced against, the need of the City for revenue and the need for a uniform method of recovering same from those against whom it is imposed. 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 37 May August 20107 MASTER FEE SCHEDULE  FEE BULLETIN 1-100 Page 2 of 3 City of Chula Vista www.chulavistaca.gov 619.691.5250 (3) the applicant is a nonprofit organization and the value of public service performed by the organization merits the waiver requested. The Waiving Authority shall issue a notice of decision, including imposition ofimpose such terms and conditions on the adjustment waiver as deemed appropriate. , and shall given dDue consideration shall be given to terms and conditions involving interest on amount deferred and, security to assure the eventual collection. Decisions of the City Manager, or designee, as Waiving Authority shall be subject to appeal to the City Council. Applicants wishing to make such an appeal must submit their request in writing to the City Clerk, within ten (10) business days of issuance of the City Manager’s notice of decision. The appeal shall be addressed to the City Council, and shall set forth therein, with specificity, the reasons for requesting said appeal of the City Manager’s decision. The City Council shall consider the appeal within 60 days of filing, or as soon thereafter as practical. Decisions of the City Council as Waiving Authority shall be deemed final. In no instance will lost revenues resulting from a fee waiver be recouped from other fee payers. Impacts to enterprise funds will be offset using discretionary funds. Waiving Authority, as the term is used herein, shall mean the City Manager, or his designee, if the amount of such waiver is less than or equal to the greater of (1) $2,500 or (2) 25% of the fee imposed by the Master Fee Schedule. If the amount of the waiver is greater than the greater of $2,500 or 25% off the original fee imposed by the Master Fee Schedule, the Waiving Authority, as used herein shall mean the City Council. LOW INCOME HOUSEHOLDS Eligibility for City programs or fee schedules restricted to low income households shall be based on the 80% level of median family income for the San Diego Metropolitan Statistical Area as determined annually by the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and detailed below: NO. IN HOUSEHOLD MAXIMUM ANNUAL FAMILY INCOME (Gross for Eligibility) 1 $46,25050,950 2 $52,90058,200 3 $59,50065,600 4 $66,10072,750 5 $71,40078,600 6 $76,70084,400 7 $81,95090,250 8 $8796,250050 An additional $1,000 annual income allowed for each additional person in household in excess of eight (8). [2009 2017 HUD Median Income Data, effective 0304/1917/0917] The maximum annual family income rates are not adopted by the City Council and are provided in the Master Fee Schedule for informational purposes only. Rates listed in the Master Fee Schedule may be updated administratively based upon HUD action without Council approval. COST RECOVERY The Master Fee Schedule reports fees for services that are provided to our citizens and visitors. The cost of providing these services includes both direct staff costs and various support and overhead costs. Fees that do not recover the full cost of providing services result in a subsidy which shifts funds away from critical, high priority needs such as public safety initiatives and infrastructure maintenance. In November 1982 the City Council adopted Resolution 11063 adopting a policy of full cost recovery, under which both the direct and overhead costs associated with providing public services are identified and, when possible, recovered. To facilitate this process, City staff annually develops a set of fully burdened hourly rates (FBHR), providing a convenient method for calculating the full costs of services. A discussion 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 38 May August 20107 MASTER FEE SCHEDULE  FEE BULLETIN 1-100 Page 3 of 3 City of Chula Vista www.chulavistaca.gov 619.691.5250 of the costs included in the calculation of the FBHR, as well as the current fiscal year rate for each classification in the City is detailed in Fee Bulletin 1-200. The City’s fully burdened rates serve as a basis for identifying the true cost of providing services, calculating fixed fee levels, and understanding the fiscal impacts of fee subsidies. The City’s fully burdened rates are not subject to annual Council adoption and are included in the Master Fee Schedule for informational purposes only. Rates may be updated administratively without additional Council action. Please contact the Finance Department to confirm current rates. 1. Full Cost Recovery Deposits Significant variances in staff time required to provide certain services make application of a fixed fee schedule impracticable. In these instances, the applicant is charged for services provided on a reimbursement basis, using the fully burdened hourly staff rates. These reimbursement based fees are designated in the Master Fee Schedule as “full cost recovery”. Initial Deposit For each such fee, an initial deposit is required. The average initial deposit amount, or an initial deposit schedule, is provided in the Master Fee Schedule for each full cost recovery deposit based fee. In all instances, the department shall determine the appropriate deposit for each application and shall attempt to limit that deposit to a reasonable amount. Additional Deposits If, at any time, it appears that the deposit amount will be insufficient to cover accumulated City costs, the applicant shall deposit additional amounts as required by the Department Head. Consultant Services If the City determines that consultants are required to assist in the processing of any permit, the City reserves the right to retain and pay such consultants from fees collected from the applicant. Release of Deposit Any funds remaining on deposit at the time of the completion or withdrawal of the application shall be returned to the depositor, after accounting for expenses, including overhead, incurred to date. 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 39 City of Chula Vista Staff Report File#:17-0338, Item#: 4. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ADOPTING THE CITY’S TRAFFIC SIGNAL COMMUNICATIONS MASTER PLAN RECOMMENDED ACTION Council adopt the resolution. SUMMARY On January 5, 2016, Council approved an agreement between the City of Chula Vista and STC Traffic, Inc. for the development of the City’s first Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan (the Plan). The goals of the Plan were to identify the condition of the existing communications system, clearly assess system gaps, and create a tool that could be used as a guide to implement immediate and long term communications Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) technologies to achieve a state-of-the-art traffic signal system. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Environmental Notice The Project qualifies for a Statutory Exemption pursuant to Section 15262 (Feasibility and Planning Studies) pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines. Environmental Determination The Director of Development Services has reviewed the proposed activity for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the proposed action, adoption of the Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan, falls under a Statutory Exemption pursuant to Section 15262 (Feasibility and Planning Studies) of the State CEQA Guidelines. Thus, no further environmental review is necessary, at this time. However, projects resulting from Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan, may require environmental review and a CEQA determination completed prior to commencing said project(s). BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION A draft of the Plan was presented as an informational item at the Safety Commission meeting on May 3, 2017. DISCUSSION On January 5, 2016, Council approved an agreement between the City of Chula Vista and STC Traffic, Inc. for the development of the Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan. STC staff diligently researched our existing system and records, interviewed City staff, and submitted a complete Plan in early July 2017. The new Plan encompasses four distinct and critical elements: (1) existing systems assessment, (2) needs assessment, (3) future system Architecture and ITS elements, and (4) implementation phasing plan including cost-benefit analysis. Each of these elements account for key components to help guide the City toward effective modernization of a comprehensive traffic signal communications City of Chula Vista Printed on 8/10/2017Page 1 of 3 powered by Legistar™2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 40 File#:17-0338, Item#: 4. guide the City toward effective modernization of a comprehensive traffic signal communications network which will support cutting-edge transportation systems and serve as a guiding foundation for the City’s deployment of Smart City technologies. With the City’s emphasis on technology to provide excellent and more efficient services to the public, the Plan provides the guiding framework for the repair, upgrade, and expansion of a traffic signal communications network that will utilize the latest in communications technology to provide a reliable and robust communications network for the asset owner and other departments throughout the City in need of a strong and effective communications network. Implementation of the $16M Plan is divided into three phases with a goal of full implementation within 10 years (depending on available funding). The three phases are summarized below: Phase 1: City-Owned Infrastructure (Year 1-3) ·Upgrade existing fiber optic systems to Ethernet communications ·Convert leased phone lines to City-owner wireless systems ·Install video monitoring systems at priority locations ·Upgrade traffic signal equipment to Ethernet-enabled devices Citywide Phase 2: Infrastructure & Priority Corridors Upgrade (Year 4-6) ·Install fiber optic cable in existing empty conduits ·Install conduit and fiber optic cable to resolve communications gaps ·Upgrade traffic signal equipment on priority corridors with new 2070ATC controllers and CCTV cameras Phase 3: Citywide Buildout (Year 7-10) ·Complete communications network ·Upgrade remaining traffic signal equipment with new 2070ATC controllers and CCTV cameras for remote monitoring Pending available funding, the Department of Engineering and Capital Projects, is planning to accelerate the implementation of the Plan and complete the recommended work in the next 5-7 years. This will be accomplished by aggressively seeking grant opportunities, public-public partnerships, and public-private partnerships to secure additional funding and/or share access to others’ communications infrastructure. It is also important to note that as technology rapidly evolves and as the City marches on to become a Smart City, it is critical that the recommendations in the Plan be considered by staff, and if desired, be implemented in the most efficient and expeditious manner in order to achieve the best return on our investment and to provide the public with the best available technology/systems which will enhance our citizens’ quality of life in the City of Chula Vista. As a growing city, with dozens of traffic signals yet to be built, this Plan supports our effort to utilize modern telecommunications construction methods that will result in a new network with a much greater level of service and connectivity. This new network will provide the capability to provide more efficient and effective traffic signal coordination timing, reduce travel times and greenhouse gases, and upgrade the network for future implementation of adaptive traffic control systems, video monitoring (for traffic) systems, pedestrian and bike counters, and many other ITS, autonomous and City of Chula Vista Printed on 8/10/2017Page 2 of 3 powered by Legistar™2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 41 File#:17-0338, Item#: 4. connected vehicle, and Smart City technologies. The Plan is already in use and is serving as a guide for staff to more effectively plan, design, and implement cutting-edge technology that will provide the public with a safer and more efficient network for all modes of transportation. DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT Staff has reviewed the decision contemplated by this action and has determined that it is not site- specific and consequently, the 500-foot rule found in California Code of Regulations Title 2, section 18702.2(a)(11), is not applicable to this decision for purposes of determining a disqualifying real property-related financial conflict of interest under the Political Reform Act (Cal. Gov't Code § 87100, et seq.). LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS The City’s Strategic Plan has five major goals: Operational Excellence, Economic Vitality, Healthy Community, Strong and Secure Neighborhoods and a Connected Community. The Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan resolution supports the Operational Excellence goal, as it promotes the use of high-end equipment and technology so employees can achieve high quality public service which results in enhanced safety and efficiency to our transportation system. This resolution also supports other major goals in the Strategic Plan since the implementation of a robust traffic signal communications network and advanced ITS technologies will create a strong foundation for the more effective deployment of Smart City Initiative technologies in the very near future. CURRENT YEAR FISCAL IMPACT Passage of this resolution will not have any direct fiscal impact on the City. The City Council adopted budget includes $3.0 million in Measure P - temporary sales tax funds allocated to Traffic Signal Systems. ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT Staff will continue to actively seek grant opportunities, public-public partnerships, and public-private partnerships to secure additional funding and/or share access to others’ communications infrastructures. Future Measure P funds are also included in the Expenditure Plan for Traffic Signal projects. ATTACHMENT 1. Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Staff Contact: Eddie Flores, City Traffic Engineer, Department of Engineering and Capital Projects City of Chula Vista Printed on 8/10/2017Page 3 of 3 powered by Legistar™2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 42 (###) (###) ### ### ### # # # # # # ### # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # ## # ### # # # #### # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # ##### ## # # # # ## ## # # #### # # # # ### # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç#Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!ñ XYXYXY XYXYXYXY XY XYXY XYXYXY !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( ") ") ")") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ")") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ")") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ")") ") ") ") ") ") ")#* #*#*#*#*#*#*#*#* #* #*#*#* #*#*#* ") ") !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$50 8 !"#$50 8 ·|}þ54·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 E J ST MAIN ST VA HT40I ST OLYMPIC PY H ST03RD AV J ST E ST L ST F ST BAY BLO TAY LAKESRD BROADWAYK ST E PALOM A R S THILLTOP DR D ST 01ST AV MOSS ST PALOMAR ST05TH AV NAPLES S T T E L E GRAPH CA NYONRD ANITA ST 02ND AV E L ST E NAPLE S S T ORANGE AV G ST C ST PASEOLADERAB O N IT A R D E I ST EOR A N G E A V E OXFO RD ST FLOWE R S T S R A N C H O D E L R E Y PY N R A NCHODELREYPY PASEO D E LREYN0 2 NDAVCREST DRE F L O W E R S T E PALOM A R D R E H ST 05TH AV K ST02ND AV I ST 01ST AVBAY BL G ST ANITA STANITA ST 03RD AVC ST NATIONAL CITY SAN DIEGO S.D. COUNTY LANDFILL S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY (112) 83(112) 80 (113) 68 (106) 28 (114) 73 (113) 89 (103) 41 (117) 94 (117) 90 (117) 91 (109) 31 (114) 72 (113) 71 (109) 55 (108) 54 (108) 53 (105) 24 (113) 70 (109) 58 (109) 56 (106) 32 (105) 26 (105) 25 (106) 27 (123) 22 (103) 23 (113) 69(108) 52 (109) 51(105) 40 (108) 79 (103) 17 (108) 49 (108) 50(105) 39 (104) 38(123) 20 (110) 81 (108) 84(108) 82 (111) 63 (111) 85 (102) 11 (102) 12 (110) 77(102) 13 (110) 78 (108) 44(104) 33 (123) 15 (104) 37 (108) 48 (108) 47(104) 36 (123) 16 (123) 21 (111) 86 (112) 67 (112) 66 (112) 65 (123) 19 (123) 18 (108) 46(104) 35 (108) 64 (104) 34 (107) 45 (107) 43 (118) 98 (108) 93 (116) 99 (125) 125 (121) 143 (117) 286 (114) 219 (103) 281 (103) 280 (117) 278 (113) 260 (120) 217 (120) 213 (106) 136 (120) 121 (117) 104 (125) 126 (117) 105 (117) 103 (116) 154 (103) 146 (125) 127 (117) 168 (116) 110 (125) 124 (105) 192 (107) 149 (115) 108 (121) 107 (125) 142 (117) 287 (116) 102 (120) 112 (103) 254 (127) 246 (127) 229 (118) 218 (120) 216 (127) 139 (118) 165 (118) 170 (118) 174 (118) 163 (118) 162 (118) 141 (118) 169 (118) 153 (118) 144 (126) 132 (126) 131 (126) 129 (116) 100 (116) 101 (126) 140 (126) 133 (127) 167 (127) 138 (127) 137 (118) 199 (116) 197 (116) 193 I NDUSTRIAL BLBRANDYWINE AVBONITA R D FLOWER S T PASEO RANCHEROMEDICAL CENTER DRN 04TH AVTIERRA DEL REY03RD AVE TS HT70E NAPLES CT MAIN STMAIN ST 113 (115) 92 (106) 29 (109) 57 (103) 30 (114) 75 (114) 74 (114) 76 (114) 59 (113) 88 (115) 87 (110) 61 (110) 60 (102) 14 (115) 95 (110) 62 (107) 42 (118) 96 (118) 97 (109) 279 (116) 109 (121) 106 (102) 151 (127) 230 (118) 156 (118) 166 (126) 130 (120) 122 (126) 111 CITY OF CHULA VISTA TRAFFIC SIGNAL COMMUNICATIONS MASTER PLAN Prepared By:JULY 2017 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 43 July 13, 2017 VERSION DATE STATUS 1 11/29/16 Issued for City Review 2 12/23/16 Issued for City Review 3 3/17/17 Issued for City Review 4 6/23/17 Submitted Final Draft 5 7/13/17 Submitted Final Report CITY OF CHULA VISTA Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 44 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | i Table of Contents Executive Summary _________________________________________________________________ 1 E1 Need ................................................................................................................................................ 1 E2 Purpose, Goals and Objectives ........................................................................................................ 2 E3 Key Recommendations .................................................................................................................... 2 E4 Implementation Phasing ................................................................................................................. 3 E5 Order of Magnitude Cost Estimate ................................................................................................. 4 E6 Cost and Benefit Analysis ................................................................................................................ 4 1 Introduction ___________________________________________________________________ 1 1.1 City Setting ............................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 City Initiatives ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Consistency with Regional, State, and National Architectures and Plans ................................ 3 1.3.1 San Diego Region Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Strategic Plan ___________ 3 1.3.2 California Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) _______________________________ 3 1.3.3 National ITS Architecture _________________________________________________ 4 1.4 Purpose and Goals ................................................................................................................... 4 1.5 Objectives ................................................................................................................................. 4 1.6 Document Organization ........................................................................................................... 5 2 Existing Systems Assessment ______________________________________________________ 7 2.1 Traffic Communications Systems.............................................................................................. 7 2.1.1 Single-mode Fiber Optic Network __________________________________________ 8 2.1.2 Leased Line and City-Owned Copper Wire Based Analog Network ________________ 8 2.1.3 Serial Wireless Radio Communications ______________________________________ 9 2.1.4 Cell Towers ____________________________________________________________ 9 2.2 Central Systems ........................................................................................................................ 9 2.2.1 Traffic Signal Communications Center and Traffic Management Center ____________ 9 2.2.2 Central Traffic Management System _______________________________________ 11 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 45 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | ii 2.2.3 Adaptive Signal Control _________________________________________________ 11 2.3 Field Elements and Traffic Operations ................................................................................... 13 2.3.1 Cabinets and Controllers ________________________________________________ 13 2.3.2 Traffic Signal Timing and Coordination _____________________________________ 13 2.3.3 Grade Crossing Preemption ______________________________________________ 14 2.3.4 Transit Signal Priority ___________________________________________________ 14 2.3.5 Emergency Vehicle Preemption ___________________________________________ 14 2.3.6 Data Acquisition Systems ________________________________________________ 16 2.4 Traffic Operations Staff........................................................................................................... 18 2.4.1 Traffic Engineering Section _______________________________________________ 18 2.4.2 Traffic Signal Maintenance Group _________________________________________ 19 2.5 Communications System Topology and Architecture ............................................................ 19 2.5.1 Existing Traffic Systems Topology __________________________________________ 20 2.5.2 Existing Traffic Systems Communications Architecture _________________________ 20 2.5.3 Regional Communications Infrastructure ___________________________________ 24 3 Needs Assessment _____________________________________________________________ 25 3.1 Stakeholder Outreach ............................................................................................................ 25 3.2 Deficiency Identification ........................................................................................................ 25 3.2.1 Traffic Communications System Deficiencies ________________________________ 25 3.2.2 Central Systems Deficiencies _____________________________________________ 26 3.2.3 Field Elements and Traffic Operations Deficiencies ____________________________ 27 3.2.4 Communications Gap Identification _______________________________________ 27 3.3 Future Roadway Projects ....................................................................................................... 30 3.3.1 Future Traffic Signals ___________________________________________________ 31 3.3.2 Future Traffic Communications Systems ____________________________________ 31 3.3.3 Future Adaptive Traffic Control System _____________________________________ 32 3.3.4 Future Coordinated Corridors ____________________________________________ 32 3.3.5 Future Roadways ______________________________________________________ 34 3.3.6 Future Roadway Widening _______________________________________________ 34 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 46 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | iii 3.4 SANDAG 2050 RTP .................................................................................................................. 34 4 Future System Architecture and ITS Elements ________________________________________ 36 4.1 Future Network Standardization ............................................................................................ 36 4.2 Future Network Architecture Examples ................................................................................. 38 4.2.1 TSCC Communication Ports ______________________________________________ 45 4.2.2 Bandwidth Requirements _______________________________________________ 46 4.2.3 IP Addressing Scheme __________________________________________________ 47 4.3 Smart City Chula Vista ............................................................................................................ 48 4.3.1 Automated Vehicle Proving Grounds _______________________________________ 48 4.3.2 I-805 Active Traffic and Demand Management _______________________________ 48 4.3.3 Connected Vehicle Technology ___________________________________________ 49 4.3.4 Intelligent Street Lighting ________________________________________________ 51 4.3.5 Advanced Transportation Controllers (ATC) __________________________________ 51 4.3.6 Future Technology Applications ___________________________________________ 51 5 Implementation Phasing Plan ____________________________________________________ 53 5.1 Phase 1: City-Owned Infrastructure (Year 1-3) ...................................................................... 53 5.2 Phase 2: Infrastructure and Priority Corridors Upgrade (Year 4-6) ........................................ 54 5.3 Phase 3: Citywide Buildout (Year 7-10) .................................................................................. 54 5.4 Cell Towers ............................................................................................................................. 58 5.5 Long-Term System Considerations ......................................................................................... 58 5.6 Fiber Optic Communication Rings Topology .......................................................................... 58 5.7 Order of Magnitude Cost Estimate ........................................................................................ 61 5.8 Connection to City Facilities ................................................................................................... 62 5.9 Funding Sources ..................................................................................................................... 64 5.9.1 Transportation Sales Tax (TransNet) ________________________________________ 64 5.9.2 General Use Sales Tax ___________________________________________________ 64 5.9.3 Gas Tax ______________________________________________________________ 64 5.9.4 Development Impact Fees (DIF) ___________________________________________ 64 5.9.5 City General Funds/Capital Improvement Program ___________________________ 65 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 47 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | iv 5.9.6 Grant Opportunities ____________________________________________________ 65 5.9.7 Assembly Bill 1447 _____________________________________________________ 66 5.9.8 Partnerships __________________________________________________________ 66 5.10 Procurement and Delivery Methods ...................................................................................... 68 5.10.1 Best Value Procurement _________________________________________________ 68 5.10.2 Design-Bid-Build _______________________________________________________ 68 5.10.3 Design-Build __________________________________________________________ 68 5.10.4 System Manager – Integrator_____________________________________________ 69 5.11 Master Plan Cost and Benefit Analysis ................................................................................... 69 5.11.1 Master Plan Costs ______________________________________________________ 69 5.11.2 Master Plan Benefits ___________________________________________________ 70 5.11.3 Cost Effectiveness ______________________________________________________ 72 5.11.4 Master Plan Maintenance _______________________________________________ 72 6 References ___________________________________________________________________ 73 Appendices Appendix A: Existing Traffic Systems Topology and Future Improvements Opportunity Areas Appendix B: Existing Traffic Signal Communications Architecture Appendix C: Future Transportation Projects and Traffic Signals Appendix D: Future Traffic Signal Communications Architecture Appendix E: Order of Magnitude Cost Estimates Appendix F: Future Traffic Signal Communication Network Map 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 48 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | v List of Figures Figure 2-1 TSCC Before and After ................................................................................................................ 10 Figure 2-2 TMC Before and After ................................................................................................................ 10 Figure 2-3 RAMS Network ........................................................................................................................... 11 Figure 2-4 SCATS Network ........................................................................................................................... 12 Figure 2-5 Existing Coordinated Corridors .................................................................................................. 15 Figure 2-6 Traffic Systems Staff Organization Chart .................................................................................... 18 Figure 2-7 Existing Traffic Signals Attribute Table ....................................................................................... 21 Figure 2-8 Existing Copper Interconnect Cable Attribute Table .................................................................. 21 Figure 2-9 Existing Fiber Optic Cable Attribute Table.................................................................................. 22 Figure 2-10 Existing Wireless Traffic Interconnect Attribute Table ............................................................. 22 Figure 2-11 Existing Traffic Systems Communication Network ................................................................... 23 Figure 3-1 Communications Gaps ............................................................................................................... 29 Figure 3-2 Future Coordinated Corridor Network ...................................................................................... 33 Figure 3-3 Future Road Network ................................................................................................................. 35 Figure 4-1 Future CORE Ring Network Topology Example .......................................................................... 37 Figure 4-2 Future Fiber and Copper Rings Network Topology Example ..................................................... 39 Figure 4-3 Future Fiber Switch Ring Topology Example .............................................................................. 40 Figure 4-4 Future VDSL Copper Switch Ring Network To pology Example .................................................. 41 Figure 4-5 Future VDSL Copper Switch Ring to Fiber Switch Ring Topology ............................................... 42 Figure 4-6 Future IoT over Cellular Wireless Network Topology Example .................................................. 43 Figure 4-7 Future Owned Wireless Network Topology Example ................................................................ 44 Figure 4-8 Future Redundant and Self-Healing Ring Architecture .............................................................. 45 Figure 5-1 Phase 1 Improvements .............................................................................................................. 55 Figure 5-2 Phase 2 Improvements .............................................................................................................. 56 Figure 5-3 Phase 3 Improvements .............................................................................................................. 57 Figure 5-4 Fiber Optic Communication Rings Topology .............................................................................. 60 Figure 5-5 Communications System Extension per City Facilities ............................................................... 63 Figure 5-6 Annual Master Plan Investment by Phase ................................................................................. 71 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 49 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | vi List of Tables Table ES-0-1 Citywide Master Plan Deployment Cost Estimate .................................................................... 4 Table 2-1 Existing Single-mode Fiber Optic Strand Counts ........................................................................... 8 Table 2-2 Existing Serial Wireless Radio Interconnect Locations .................................................................. 9 Table 2-3 Existing Coordinated Corridors .................................................................................................... 13 Table 2-4 Traffic Measurement Devices Location Summary ....................................................................... 17 Table 2-5 Summary of Inventory Information for Existing Conditions Dynamic Layer Set ......................... 19 Table 2-6 Existing Traffic Signal Communications Summary ....................................................................... 20 Table 3-1 Traffic Signal Communications Infrastructure and Deficiencies Summary .................................. 28 Table 4-1 ITS Data Applications Summary ................................................................................................... 52 Table 5-1 Long-Term System Improvement Order of Magnitude Costs ...................................................... 58 Table 5-2 Phase 1 Deployment Cost Estimate ............................................................................................. 61 Table 5-3 Phase 2 Deployment Cost Estimate ............................................................................................. 61 Table 5-4 Phase 3 Deployment Cost Estimate ............................................................................................. 62 Table 5-5 Deployment Cost Estimate by Phase ........................................................................................... 62 Table 5-6 Deployment Cost Estimate of Connection to City Facilities ........................................................ 62 Table 5-7 FY 17/18-FY 21/22 Forecasted CIP Budget .................................................................................. 65 Table 5-8 Master Plan Spending by Phase .................................................................................................. 70 Table 5-9 Phase 1 Benefit Summary (Per Year) ........................................................................................... 70 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 50 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | vii List of Acronyms AASHTO ……………………………………………. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials ALOS ……………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………… Arterial Level of Service API …………………………………………………………………………………………………..… Application Programming Interface ATC ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Advanced Traffic Controller ATCMTD …………………..… Advanced Transportation and Congestion Management Technologies Deployment ATCS ………………………………………………………………………………………………………... Adaptive Traffic Control System ATP ……………………………………………………………………………………………………...…… Active Transportation Program ATT ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. Arterial Travel Time AV …………………………………………………………………………….………………………………………………… Automated Vehicle BBS …………………………………………………………………………………………………….………………… Battery Backup System BPS …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..……… Bits Per Second Caltrans ……………………………………………………………………………………… California Department of Transportation CAT ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………………… Category CCTV ………………………………………………………………………………………………….……………….. Closed Circuit Television CDBG ……………………………………………………………………..……………………… Community Development Block Grant CIP ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………. Capital Improvement Program CMU …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………....... Conflict Monitor Unit COM …………………………………………………………………………………………………...………………………… Communications CVBMP …………………………………………………………………..……………………………… Chula Vista Bayfront Master Plan DAR …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Direct Access Ramp DIF …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Development Impact Fees DMS ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Dynamic Message Sign DSRC ………………………………………………….……………………………………… Dedicated Short Range Communications EIR ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Environmental Impact Report EPA ………………………………………………………………………………… United States Environmental Protection Agency EV ………………………………………………………………………………..…………………………………………………… Electric Vehicle EVP ………………………………………………………………………………………………….……… Emergency Vehicle Preemption 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 51 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | viii FAST …………………………………………………………………………………….. Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act FES ………………………………………………………………………………………………………..………………… Field Ethernet Switch FWG ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Fiber Working Group FY…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..………………………… Fiscal Year GHG ………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………… Green House Gas GIS ………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Geographic Information Systems GMOC ………………………………………………………………………………… Growth Management Oversight Commission GPS ……………………………………………………………………………………………..…………………… Global Positioning System Hi-Res……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… High-Resolution HSIP…………………………………………………………………………………………… Highway Safety Improvements Program IoT ………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………… Internet of Things IP……………………………………………………….………………………………………………………………………… Internet Protocol IR ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Infrared IT ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Information Technology ITS ………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Intelligent Transportation System JPO …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Joint Program Office LED …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Light Emitting Diode MBPS ……………………………………………….……………………………………………………………………… Megabits Per Second MFES ……………………………………………………………..………………………………………… Managed Field Ethernet Switch MTS ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Metropolitan Transit System NTCIP ……………………………………………………………… National Transportation Communications for ITS Protocol POTS ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..……… Plain Old Telephone Service PTZ ………………………………………………………………………………………………..…………………………………… Pan-Tilt-Zoom QoS ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….……… Quality of Service RAMS …………………………………………………………………………………………… Regional Arterial Management System ROI ……………………………………………………………………………………………………….………………… Return on Investment RTCM ………………………………………………………………………… Radio Technical Commission for Maritime Services RTMS ……………………………………………………………………………….………………… Remote Traffic Microwave Sensors RTP ………………………………………………………………………………………..…………………… Regional Transportation Plan 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 52 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | ix SANDAG ….…………………………………………………………………………………… San Diego Association of Governments SCATS …………………………………………………………………………………… Sydney Coordinated Adaptive Traffic System SCN ……………………………………………………………………………………………..……………………… System Control Number SFP ………………………………………………………………………………………………………….……………………… Single Fiber Port SHSP …………………………………………………………………………………..……………………… Strategic Highway Safety Plan SPA ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Sectional Planning Area SPaT …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Signal Phase and Timing TDIF ……………………………………..…………………………………………………… Transportation Development Impact Fee TMC ……………………………………………………………………………………….……………………… Traffic Management Center TMP ………………………………………………….…………………………………………………………… Traffic Monitoring Program TOD ……………………………….………………………………………………………………………..………………….………… Time of Day TSCC ……………………………………………….……………………………………………… Traffic Signal Communications Center ULOS …………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Urban Street Level of Service USDOT ………………………………………………………………………………… United States Department of Transportation V2I ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Vehicle to Infrastructure VDSL …………………………………………………………………………………….…… Very High Bit Rate Digital Subscriber Line VOS ……………………………..……………………………………………………………….………………… Volume-Occupancy-Speed 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 53 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | ES-1 Executive Summary The City of Chula Vista is preparing for the next generation of technology which will support the City’s smart growth and development. At the core of the City’s “Smart City” initiatives are investments in Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) infrastructure. Through leveraging state-of-the-art communications systems and Internet of Things (IoT) devices the city will have the ability to gather and analyze data to gain insights into infrastructure and travel that will lead to better transportation system management and overall improvement in public services. The Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan purpose (hereby referred to as Master Plan) is to guide the City’s investment and implementation in traffic signal communications systems and ITS technology. Chula Vista is San Diego County’s second largest and fastest growing city. The Master Plan is critical to ensure the City ’s current and future transportation system needs and objectives are realized through this growth. Most importantly, the implementation of the Master Plan will promote the City’s vision of sustainability, economic vitality and high quality of life – through the significant benefits of traffic systems technology and improved traffic management and operations. E1 Need The communications system is the most critical part of a traffic management system and delivers information from City streets and intersections back to the Traffic Management Center (TMC) where the management and operation activities take place. The City of Chula Vista monitors and manages 267 traffic signals, providing safe movement at signalized intersections for vehicles, pedestrians, bicyclists, emergency vehicles, transit, and rail1. The City of Chula Vista is the fastest growing City in San Diego County and is expected to add in the order of 100 new traffic signals in the next five to ten years2. Like many municipalities in San Diego County, the Chula Vista traffic signal communication system operates legacy equipment and obsolete communication protocol. POTS (Plain Old Telephone Service) leased lines provide the primary communication links between groups of traffic signals and the traffic equipment room in City Hall. There are several limiting factors associated with this antiquated communication architecture: modern devices with desirable capabilities do not support the legacy protocols, the existing communication bandwidth is a fraction of modern systems, operating and maintaining the existing communications and legacy devices is increasingly difficult and expensive, and the City relies on a third- party service provider which is costly3. To sum it up, the existing traffic communications system is functionally obsolete and costly. As the City continues to experience rapid growth and development it is critical to plan for new technology that will promote efficient management and operations in the modern traffic environment. 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 54 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | ES-2 E2 Purpose, Goals and ObjecƟves The purpose of the Master Plan is to create a detailed inventory of the City’s communications systems and to guide the City’s future traffic signal communications and ITS technology improvements. An intelligent traffic signal communications system is beneficial in many ways and promotes goals including: increased roadway safety, shortened commute times, travel reliability, reduced greenhouse gasses, economic and sustainable growth, and increased mobility at signalized intersections for all modes of travel including motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians, transit, and emergency vehicles. The traffic signal communications system is essential for Chula Vista to provide a proactive approach to traffic management and all around better service to the traveling public. The Master Plan provides a framework to strategically achieve the following primary objectives:  Develop system topology and network architecture for a future-proof city-owned communication platform concept.  Leverage existing communications infrastructure investments to support new systems and technologies.  Establish solutions for existing system deficiencies.  Eliminate 3rd party service for traffic signal communications.  Identify current and future traffic system needs and leverage new technology to meet the needs.  Incorporate recommendations into other City planning and development projects.  Support other City departments communication system needs. • Identify connections to City initiatives including Smart City and Climate Action that will benefit from the Master Plan. • Identify potential partnerships with regional public agencies and private entities to advance master plan implementation.  Establish consistent ITS infrastructure improvements through the various capital improvement channels.  Develop an implementation prioritization and phasing strategy.  Estimate order of magnitude costs, assess resources, and system benefits. E3 Key RecommendaƟons Key communications systems and ITS element recommendations identified in the Master Plan are summarized below and in the following section.  The City of Chula Vista future traffic signal communication system network will be based on Ethernet protocol.  The future network will combine multiple communications medium such as single mode fiber, existing copper plant, point-to-multipoint wireless, and cellular. Goals Purpose Objectives Goals Purpose Objectives 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 55 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | ES-3  The future “CORE” network will use Layer 3 nodes connecting to each other via single mode fiber links. E4 ImplementaƟon Phasing The highest priorities include establishing a City-owned traffic signal communication system and implementing Ethernet-compatible systems/network. Existing investments in communication infrastructure, underground systems, signal interconnect cable, and traffic signal cabinets will continue to be utilized. Obsolete legacy network equipment will be upgraded or decommissioned and replaced with new modern communication technologies. The timeframe for each phase of implementation is based on available funding and could be accelerated as additional funds are made available. Phase 1: City-Owned Infrastructure (Year 1-3) Phase 1 of the implementation plan includes providing a wholly City-owned traffic signal communication network, converting from Serial to an all Ethernet-based network, upgrading traffic signal controllers to Ethernet protocol, and establishing video monitoring at the City’s highest priority locations. The following summarizes the Phase 1 traffic signal communications network upgrades: • Upgrade existing fiber optic system to Ethernet communications. • Convert leased copper lines to City-owned wireless Ethernet radio communications. • Upgrade City-owned copper lines to Ethernet-over-copper communications. • Install City-owned wireless Ethernet radio communications at all offline traffic signals. • Convert leased cellular network for existing Traffic Measurement Devices to City-owned wireless Ethernet radio communications. • Install video monitoring devices at high priority locations. • Install fixed Dynamic Message Signs at the Chula Vista Amphitheater. • Obtain 2 portable Dynamic Message Signs for use during planned or unforeseen major traffic impacting events. • Install a satellite Traffic Management Center at the City’s Traffic Operations Maintenance Facility. • Upgrade all traffic signal equipment to Ethernet-enabled devices Citywide. • Implement Layer 3 communication hubs at strategic locations. Phase 2: Infrastructure and Priority Corridors Upgrade (Year 4-6) Phase 2 of the Implementation Plan prioritizes fiber optic communications. Strategic signalized intersections along priority corridors throughout the City will be upgraded to include type 2070 ATC traffic signal controllers and closed circuit televisions (CCTV) cameras for remote video monitoring. The following summarizes the Phase 2 traffic signal communications network upgrades: • Upgrade existing empty communications conduit and install fiber optic cable. 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 56 ChulaVistaTraffic SignalCommunicationsMasterPlanPage|ES-4 Ȉ Installconduitandfiberopticcabletoresolvecommunicationsgapsinthenetworkandcreate redundantringtopology. Ȉ Upgradetrafficsignalequipmentonprimaryfiberopticringroutewithfiberdevices. Ȉ Upgradetrafficsignalequipmentonprioritycorridorswithnew2070controllersandCCTVcameras. Phase3:CitywideBuildout(Year7-10) BuildoutofthetrafficsignalcommunicationsnetworkwillbecompletedinPhase3.Remainingsignalized intersectionswillbeupgradedwithtype2070ATC trafficsignalcontrollersandclosed-circuittelevision (CCTV)camerasforremotevideomonitoring. E5OrderofMagnitudeCostEsƟmate AsummaryofthecostsforthedeploymentoftheMasterPlan,brokendownbytheimplementation phase,isshownonTable ES-1. Table ES-0-1CitywideMasterPlanDeploymentCostEstimate PHASEDESCRIPTIONTOTAL 1City-OwnedInfrastructure$4,794,750 2InfrastructureandPriorityCorridorUpgrades$7,092,075 3CitywideBuildout$3,949,500 GRANDTOTAL $15,836,325 Note:Eachphasewillbeimplementedinstagesasfundingbecomesavailable. TheorderofmagnitudecostestimatefortheMasterPlanimplementationis$15,836,325. E6CostandBeneĮtAnalysis Theannualbenefit-costratio forimplementingPhase1is65:1.Thisindicatesthatimprovementswould yieldbenefitsof$65foreverydollarspent.WithcostsavingsexceedingtheStateandNationalbenefit- costratiorangeof20to60:1returnoninvestment(ROI)forPhase1alone,themonetaryinvestments identifiedintheMasterPlanarepoisedtoberecapturedmanytimesoverforbotheconomicandsocial benefit. 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 57 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 1 1 Introduction The City of Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan establishes the planning framework for implementing state-of-the-art communications technology and Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) elements to meet the City’s immediate and long-term traffic system needs. The City has placed great emphasis on immediate and long-range planning in its continued effort to strike a balance between quality of life and growth. The Master Plan is a central element to the City’s overall planning framework and establishes a proactive approach to better serve the public through state-of-the-art traffic systems technology. The Master Plan was initiated to address two overarching needs: (1) the immediate need to replace the existing obsolete systems that inhibit staff’s ability to efficiently manage the traffic signal system and (2) address the long term need to establish a future-proof platform that supports growth and enables the City to implement and utilize future transportation systems technology. The Master Plan provides concepts, assessments, and illustrations in one comprehensive guiding document for staff’s use in preparing the future City traffic signal communication system and ITS infrastructure. 1.1 City Seƫng The City of Chula Vista has a population of over 260,000 people1, covers an area of 52.1 square miles2, is the 2nd largest City in San Diego County3, and is the 14th largest City in the State of California4. Chula Vista is also the fastest growing City in the San Diego Region with large areas of planned development. To give the City’s growth context, the City’s General Plan anticipates a population of over 300,000 residents by 2030, and an additional 100 new traffic signals. 1.2 City IniƟaƟves The City promotes the orderly management of growth in a manner that maintains a balance between quality of life, the environment and economic stability by applying the General Plan and related supporting San Diego County Chula Vista 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 58 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 2 plans. The City is a recognized leader in conservation and renewable energy implementing policies that have led Chula Vista to become a smarter city, with development practices now delivering many Smart City initiatives. A sample of Chula Vista’s Smart City initiatives include: • The Bayfront Smart City which brings the latest in infrastructure technology for maximum energy efficiency and sustainability outcomes to the largest waterfront development on the West Coast5. • One of the densest networks of Electric Vehicle (EV) charging stations in the Country6. • Constructed and opened a new state-of-the-art Traffic Management Center and Traffic Signal Communication Center in January 2017. • Implementation of a new state-of-the-art Adaptive Traffic Control System (ATCS). • The ACT Chula Vista citizen web portal connecting citizens with each other and City services creating a web-based connected community platform7. • Competed for the USDOT’s Smart City Challenge in 2016 which became the impetus for Chula Vista being selected as an “Autonomous Vehicle Proving Ground” in January 2017 – one of ten sites chosen by the USDOT to collaborate and test the practicality of autonomous cars on public roads. • Received the 2014 EPA Center for Corporate Leadership, Climate Leadership Award for exemplary climate actions. The Master Plan connects into and supports many existing forward reaching initiatives in the City’s planning structure including: • City of Chula Vista General Plan. • Chula Vista Bayfront Master Plan. • City of Chula Vista Climate Action Plan. • City of Chula Vista Clean Transportation Energy Roadmap. • City of Chula Vista Strategic Plan. • City of Chula Vista City Operations Sustainability Plan. • City of Chula Vista Growth Management Program. • City of Chula Vista Neighborhood Traffic and Pedestrian Safety Program. • City of Chula Vista Pedestrian Master Plan. • City of Chula Vista Bikeway Master Plan. 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 59 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 3 1.3 Consistency with Regional, State, and NaƟonal Architectures and Plans The "V" Diagram is the standard way to represent the systems engineering process for ITS projects. Following this process reduces risk, controls cost and schedule, improves quality, and results in a system that meets the user needs8. The Master Plan is the earliest planning stage (pre-design) of the systems engineering process and presents high- level concepts and architecture and supports initial needs identification. The Master Plan lays the groundwork for capital improvement programming, prioritization, and budgeting for future identified projects through subsequent parts of the systems engineering process. 1.3.1 San Diego Region Intelligent Transporta Ɵon Systems (ITS) Strategic Plan The San Diego Region ITS Strategic Plan provides a unified vision for regional ITS investment strategies that regional transportation agencies prioritized for funding and implementation9. The ITS Strategic Plan provides policy guidance and articulates the common vision for the employment of ITS technologies to improve mobility, safety, efficiency, and reliability throughout the region and is a supporting document to San Diego Forward (The Regional Plan) and the SANDAG 2050 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP)10. The Master Plan will advance the regional goals to the next level in Chula Vista by identifying specific ITS technologies, deployment strategies, and the resources required. 1.3.2 California Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) The California Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) identifies signal timing and ITS tools as appropriate safety countermeasures for intersection crashes11. The California Local Roadway Safety Manual also identifies improved signal timing, coordination, and operation as a safety benefit to address locations that have a crash history at multiple signalized intersections12. The Master Plan recommends systems necessary for implementing traffic signal control strategies, including coordinated traffic signal operations. This will maximize throughput, minimize stops and reduce delay on roadways. In turn, there will be fewer intersection red-light violations, a reduction in aggressive driver behavior, and a decrease in intersection crashes. Master Planning 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 60 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 4 1.3.3 NaƟonal ITS Architecture The National ITS Architecture provides a common framework for planning, defining, and integrating ITS. It is a mature architecture that reflects the contributions of a broad cross-section of the ITS community (e.g., transportation practitioners, systems engineers, system developers, technology specialists). It is comprised of three primary layers: communications, transportation, and institutional which set the building block for ITS development13. The Master Plan addresses the communication layer of the National Architecture. Communications systems are the wireline and wireless systems and equipment that provide paths and connections to transmit information. The City relies on the communications system to support management and operation of the many functional aspects of the City’s transportation system. 1.4 Purpose and Goals The purpose of the Master Plan is to guide the replacement of existing obsolete systems that inhibit staff’s ability to efficiently manage the traffic signal system and to establish a platform for the City to implement and utilize future transportation systems technology. The plan represents a significant opportunity for the City of Chula Vista to advance traffic signal communications systems and supporting elements to the technological forefront. An intelligent traffic signal communication system is beneficial in many ways and promotes: increased roadway safety, shortened commute times, travel reliability, reduced greenhouse gasses, and economic and sustainable growth. The Master Plan will open doors to opportunities including: access to grant funding, coordination with various projects and developments, cost savings on leased communications for numerous City needs, providing a future proof platform, and advancing related Smart City and Climate Action initiatives. The Master Plan ultimately improves mobility through robust communications and enhanced traffic signal management and operations for all modes of transportation including motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians, transit, and emergency vehicles. 1.5 ObjecƟves The traffic signal communication system is essential for Chula Vista to provide a proactive approach to traffic management and all around better service to the traveling public. The plan provides a framework to strategically achieve the following primary objectives:  Develop system topology and network architecture for a future-proof city-owned communication platform concept.  Leverage existing communications infrastructure investments to support new systems and technologies.  Establish resolutions for existing system deficiencies. 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 61 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 5  Eliminate 3rd party service for traffic signal communications.  Identify current and future traffic system needs and leverage new technology to meet the needs.  Incorporate recommendations into other City planning and development projects.  Support other City departments communication system needs. • Identify connections to City initiatives including Smart City and Climate Action that will benefit from the Master Plan. • Identify potential partnerships with regional public agencies and private entities to advance master plan implementation.  Establish consistent ITS infrastructure improvements through the various capital improvement channels.  Develop an implementation prioritization and phasing strategy.  Estimate order of magnitude costs, assess resources, and system benefits. 1.6 Document OrganizaƟon The remainder of this document is organized into three sections as described below: Existing Systems Assessment Presents the extensive research and corresponding inventories completed for existing traffic systems throughout the City including: communications systems, central systems, field elements and traffic operations, and staff organization. The results of the existing systems assessment are presented on system architecture maps and schematics in the Appendix. Needs Assessment This section is divided into two primary subsections: existing system deficiencies and future roadway network needs. The existing system deficiencies and needs build on the existing systems assessment. The City’s future transportation network plans are also presented to identify where the traffic signal communications infrastructure will be required. The results of the existing deficiency and future transportation network research are summarized on figures and maps included in the section. Future System Architecture and ITS Elements This section presents the network and ITS elements, standardization, topology, physical and logical requirements to achieve the future communication system concept. Several architecture examples are provided to demonstrate system connectivity and resiliency. This section also presents the communication system relation to Chula Vista Smart City transportation initiatives. A schematic detailing the future traffic system communications architecture concept is provided in the Appendix. 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 62 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 6 Implementation Phasing and Cost-Benefit Analysis Presents a strategic implementation phasing plan that includes deployment prioritization and phasing. Order of magnitude cost estimates for technical solutions to communications deficiencies are presented for each phase, and the phased future traffic signal communication map concept is provided. This section also presents an analysis of the costs and benefits associated with implementation of the Master Plan recommendations by deployment phases. The timeframe for each implementation phase is dependent on available funding and is subject to acceleration as additional funds are made available. 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 63 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 7 2 Existing Systems Assessment The basis for planning the concept of the future communication system architecture is laid upon the foundation of the existing traffic signal and communication system infrastructure. This section documents the results of extensive research and inventories of the City’s existing traffic systems including: communications, central systems, field elements, operations, and staff. Several sources of information were utilized to obtain information including: • Geographic Information Systems (GIS). • Laser fiche as-built records. • Accounting systems. • QuicNet and SCATS systems. • Field reviews. • Interviews with city staff. Documentation was obtained from various city departments including: Public Works/Engineering, GIS, Information Technology (IT), Development Services, and Planning. Shapefiles with attribute tables detailing the number and location for existing traffic signals, conduit, and wireless towers was provided by the City’s Geographic Information Services (GIS) Department. A digital library comprising 910 researched plans and documents of the City’s traffic systems was created. The various information sources were compared and verified with City traffic signal maintenance staff to produce an accurate map of existing traffic systems Citywide. At the time of this report, 267 traffic signals are owned and operated by the City of Chula Vista. A Geographical Information System (GIS) database and map of the existing systems infrastructure was created and is provided in Appendix A and a schematic detailing the existing traffic system communications architecture is provided in Appendix B. Detailed review information is presented throughout the remainder of this section. 2.1 Tra ffic CommunicaƟons Systems The City of Chula Vista’s traffic communications system is extensive, connecting all the existing traffic signals and traffic data collection systems in the City, and is comprised of numerous media and network devices. Traffic communication system documentation was researched to determine location and status of: • Single-mode fiber optic network. • Third-party owned leased line wire based analog network. • City-owned copper wire based analog network. • Serial wireless radio communications network. 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 64 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 8 The communications system includes a combination of twisted pair copper wired based media, fiber optic cable media, and Serial digital wireless radios. Third-party owned and serviced Plain Old Telephone Service (POTS) leased lines provide the primary communication links between traffic systems and the City’s existing Traffic Signal Communication Center (TSCC) located at City Hall. The following subsections provide summaries of the existing traffic communications systems and network architecture. 2.1.1 Single-mode Fiber OpƟc Network Single-mode fiber optic cable provides communications between the TSCC and 25 traffic signals located along Fourth Avenue, H Street, and Main Street. Fiber strand counts are summarized in Table 2-1. Table 2-1 Existing Single-mode Fiber Optic Strand Counts STREET (NORTH/EAST) LIMIT (SOUTH/WEST) LIMIT CABLE Fourth Avenue (N) Brisbane Street (S) Main Street 288-strand SMFOC Main Street (E) Main Street (W) Broadway 288-strand SMFOC Davidson Street (E) Fourth Avenue (W) Guava Avenue 288-strand SMFOC H Street (E) Hidden Vista Drive (W) Fourth Avenue 36-strand SMFOC 2.1.2 Leased Line and City-Owned Copper Wire Based Analog Network Accounting systems that contained information on the City’s third-party owned leased line communications for various traffic systems throughout Chula Vista were researched. Billing information identified circuit numbers that corresponded with the City’s TSCC and the individual traffic system telephone drop locations. The location information was cross-checked and verified with the System Control Number (SCN) address reference table provided by the City’s traffic signal maintenance department and the traffic signal controller list generated by the City’s QuicNet 4+ central traffic management system. Billing statements indicate approximately $75,000 is spent annually on leased line communications1. Nearly 90% of the City’s 267 traffic signals communicate with the TSCC through a third-party owned POTS leased line network. The existing AT&T lease line telephone drops provide communication links between the TSCC and individual traffic signals or groups of traffic signals, interconnected by the City-owned copper wire based analog multi-drop network. The original leased lines were first installed approximately 30 years ago by Pacific Bell Telephone Company (PacBell) in the western portion of the City. As the City continued to develop, City-owned twisted pair copper interconnect was installed intermittently with developments and capital improvements. The western portion of Chula Vista, between the I-5 and I-805, is the oldest part of the City and contains a minimal amount of City-owned twisted pair interconnect. The areas east of I-805 are newer and contain more City-owned twisted pair interconnect. All the existing copper wire based interconnect links operate on legacy Serial 1,200 bps analog modems and lack direct connections to the City’s TSCC, and thus require 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 65 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 9 utilization of leased line telephone drop communications. The existing network is obsolete and is incapable of supporting modern ITS technologies. 2.1.3 Serial Wireless Radio CommunicaƟons Several traffic signal locations in the City utilize Serial wireless radios for communications due to a lack of copper wire or fiber infrastructure to provide direct connection to the TSCC. Wireless radio communication is 900 MHZ Serial (EIA-232) digital, low bandwidth. Existing wireless radio interconnect locations are summarized in Table 2-2. Table 2-2 Existing Serial Wireless Radio Interconnect Locations STREET (NORTH/EAST) LIMIT (SOUTH/WEST) LIMIT Third Avenue (N) Moss Street (S) Naples Street Fourth Avenue (N) Anita Street (S) Montgomery School Crossing Quintard Street (E) Second Avenue (W) Third Avenue Hilltop Drive (N) Naples Street (S) Oxford Street 2.1.4 Cell Towers There are City-owned and privately-owned cell towers located throughout the City. The number and location were determined from shapefiles provided by the City’s GIS Department. The cell towers are not currently used for traffic-related systems. 2.2 Central Systems The City’s central systems are housed in City Hall and include: • Traffic Signal Communication Center (TSCC) • Traffic Management Center (TMC) • QuicNet 4+ Regional Arterial Management System (RAMS) • Sydney Coordinated Adaptive Traffic System (SCATS) As-built documentation was unavailable for several of the traffic systems housed within the City’s existing TSCC. Limited existing documentation was supplemented with on-site investigations. 2.2.1 Tra ffic Signal CommunicaƟons Center and Tra ffic Management Center The TSCC was constructed with City Hall in 2004 and quickly became a dual-purpose data center and Traffic Management Center (TMC). At 9 feet by 17 feet, the TSCC was not designed to be used as a TMC and over time, the room became congested and disorganized as new equipment and systems were installed2. TSCC equipment includes: • AT&T telephone service lines termination panel with multiple demarcation points. • 288-strand single-mode fiber optic cable line. 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 66 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 10 • Splice enclosure rack mount. • Traffic signal test cabinet. • Two equipment racks housing analog modems. • Two Digi 16-port Serial communications servers. • QuicNet 4+ Server • SCATS Server • Battery back-up system. • Cisco 10 Base-T/100 Base-Tx Ethernet switch. • Type I enclosure breaker panel serving the existing TSCC room, IT room, and new TMC room. The City executed a design-build contract with STC Traffic to remodel the TSCC into a distinct data center and build a new TMC. The project was completed in early 2017. Figures 2-1 and 2-2 below show the TSCC and TMC before and after construction. Figure 2-1 TSCC Before and After Figure 2-2 TMC Before and After BEFORE AFTER BEFORE AFTER 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 67 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 11 2.2.2 Central Tra ffic Management System The City utilizes the QuicNet 4+ Regional Arterial Management Systems (RAMS) central control software for traffic management. Implemented in 2006, RAMS enables sharing of traffic signal operation information across jurisdictions in San Diego County through the QuicNet 4+ software application. Communications between agencies is accomplished over a T1 leased line and connectivity for the City is illustrated in Figure 2-3. The RAMS systems are currently being upgraded to Transparity as part of the system maintenance program. A new fiber optic line has been installed at the City’s TMC and communications will be 2 Mbps Ethernet over fiber when Transparity is active. Figure 2-3 RAMS Network 2.2.3 AdapƟve Signal Control The City of Chula Vista installed the Sydney Coordinated Adaptive Traffic System (SCATS) in May 2003. The system objectives include selecting cycle lengths, splits, and offsets to minimize stops during light demand, minimize delays during normal demand, and maximize throughput during heavy demand. The SCATS system includes twelve intersections along portions of East H Street and Otay Lakes Road3. The system runs on a dedicated server located in the TSCC. The server and user workstation are connected via a hub and 10/100 Base-T LAN. A 16-channel Serial interface unit communicates with the intersections through 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 68 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 12 data multiplexers and three low speed modems. Seven low speed channels from the 16-port Serial interface connect to the multiplexer located at Chula Vista City Hall. A composite signal from this multiplexer connects to a modem configured for 2400 bps synchronous operation. The voice frequency side of the modem connects with a changeover switch to the telephone drop cabinet third-party lease line at the East H Street and Southwestern College Entrance intersection and provides a composite signal to a multiplexer. The multiplexer decodes the seven low speed intersection signals and connects to the intersection modems and a changeover switches the communications line connections to the configuration required for SCATS4. Field elements include 2070 controllers with TransCore software and the modem and multiplexer equipment. System elements in the TSCC include a Windows NT operating system based PC server, SCATS intersection control software version 5, Serial interface hardware and software, modem and multiplexer equipment, an equipment rack, and a user work station. The SCATS network is shown in Figure 2-4. The SCATS system is no longer operational due to the SCATS server failure and a replacement adaptive traffic signal control system is currently being deployed. Figure 2-4 SCATS Network 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 69 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 13 2.3 Field Elements and Tra ffic OperaƟons The ITS communication and central systems previously described are utilized to manage and operate various connected devices in the field. These include traffic signal cabinets and controllers that operate timing and coordination, emergency vehicle preemption systems, grade crossing preemption, transit signal priority, and data acquisition systems. 2.3.1 Cabinets and Controllers The most common signal cabinet and current standard installation in the City is the type 332 controller cabinet. Most of the traffic signal controllers in Chula Vista are type 170 or Type 170E running 233 intersection control programs. As previously described in Section 2.2.3 there are 12 traffic signals that have custom-built 2070 controllers that run SCATS intersection control software version 5. 2.3.2 Tra ffic Signal Timing and CoordinaƟon Many traffic signals throughout the City run Time of Day (TOD) plans with coordination patterns typically scheduled during the morning, midday, and evening peak periods along arterials and secondary roadways. Table 2-3 contains a list of the 22 coordinated corridors in the City. The corridors are illustrated geographically on Figure 2-5. Table 2-3 Existing Coordinated Corridors STREET (NORTH/EAST) LIMIT (SOUTH/WEST) LIMIT Bonita Road (E) Billy Casper Way (W) Willow Street Broadway (N) C Street (S) H Street Broadway (N) H Street (S) Palomar Street E Street (E) Bonita Road (W) Woodlawn Avenue East H Street (E) Otay Lakes Road (W) Hidden Vista Drive Fifth Avenue (N) F Street (S) G Street Fourth Avenue (N) Brisbane St (S) Main Street H Street (E) Hilltop Dr (W) Broadway Hilltop Drive (N) I Street (S) J Street L Street (E) Nacion Avenue Broadway Main Street (E) I-805 (W) Industrial Blvd Main Street (E) Nirvana Avenue (W) I-805 Olympic Parkway (E) Eastlake Parkway (W) Heritage Road Orange Avenue (E) Max Avenue (W) Fourth Avenue Orange Avenue/Olympic Parkway (E) Brandywine Avenue (W) Melrose Avenue Otay Lakes Road (E) Lane Avenue (W) La Media Road Otay Lakes Road (N) Bonita Vista High School Drwy (S) East H Street 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 70 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 14 STREET (NORTH/EAST) LIMIT (SOUTH/WEST) LIMIT Otay Lakes Road (N) East H Street (S) Telegraph Canyon Road Palomar Street (E) Orange Avenue (W) Industrial Boulevard Palomar Street (E) Hilltop Drive (W) Fourth Avenue Telegraph Canyon Road (E) Otay Lakes Road (W) Canyon Plaza Driveway Third Avenue (N) H Street (S) Main Street 2.3.3 Grade Crossing PreempƟon The Blue Line Trolley route, operated by the San Diego Metropolitan Transit System (MTS) has 3 station stops in Chula Vista: Bayfront/ E Street, H Street, and Palomar Street. The Blue Line runs parallel to Industrial Blvd and there are 7 preempted traffic signals. The grade crossing preemption systems were recently upgraded to operate advance preemption and supervisory circuits. This preemption operation is more complex than traditional preemption operation and requires more complex controller programming and railroad to traffic signal interconnect. 2.3.4 Transit Signal Priority The South Bay Rapid project includes a 21-mile bus route that will run between the Otay Mesa Port of Entry and Downtown San Diego via National City and eastern Chula Vista. Eight stations in eastern Chula Vista and Otay Mesa, a Direct Access Ramp (DAR) on East Palomar Street at I-805, and a nearly six-mile dedicated transit lane in the median of East Palomar Street and along Eastlake Parkway are planned along the route. All phases of the South Bay Rapid project are currently in construction including 12 of the 15 total stations, arterial transit-only lanes on East Palomar Street, Transit Signal Priority (TSP), and enhanced customer amenities5. 2.3.5 Emergency Vehicle PreempƟon Emergency Vehicle Preemption (EVP) technology overrides typical traffic signal operations to provide priority for approaching emergency responder vehicles including firetrucks and ambulances. The typical emergency vehicle preemption build throughout Chula Vista includes an infrared-based system with varying models of Opticom phase selectors and infrared system emitters and detectors. Preemption devices throughout the City are typically older and range in age from 5 years to 15 years old. 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 71 (###) (###) (###) (###) ### ### ### ### ### ñ !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$508 !"#$508 !"#$508 ·|}þ54·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 150 119 (103)30 (103)41 (114)59 (113)88(103)23 (103)17 (110)61 (105)39 (104)38 (111)63 (110)78 (104)37 (110)62 (122)265 (122)283 (122)285(122)288 (121)143 (117)286 (114)219 (103)281 (103)280 (113)260 (120)217 (120)213 (120)121 (117)105 (125)124 (125)142 (117)287 (124)221 (116)102 (120)112 (122)284 (122)282 (128)273 (121)264 (121)266 (121)267 (122)244 (122)237 (122)238 (122)259 (122)257(122)256(122)262(122)261 (122)251 (121)248 (121)247 (122)245 (122)243 (122)233 (122)252 (122)222 (128)258 (124)253 (121)250 (121)227 (103)254 (121)224 (121)225 (121)242 (121)241 (121)240 (121)239 (122)236(122)235 (128)234 (121)226 (124)223 (118)218 (120)216 (128)214 (118)170 (118)166 (118)174 (118)169 (118)172 (118)183(118)182 (124)179 (124)178 (124)152 (118)161 (118)153 (126)131 (126)129 (120)122 (116)101 (124)155 (128)177 (124)164 (128)181 (124)158 (120)120 (115)159 (118)199 (124)195 (128)202 (128)203 (124)211 (101)206 (122)207 (128)200 (128)204 (128)196 (116)193 (128)194 (128)186 (128)205 (124)191 (124)187 (124)208 (124)188 (124)184 (121)198 255115 117 113 114 116 118 173 135 128 (112)83(112)80 (113)68 (115)92 (106)29 (106)28 (109)57 (114)75 (114)73 (113)89 (117)94 (117)90 (117)91 (114)74 (109)31 (114)72 (113)71 (109)55 (108)54 (108)53 (105)24 (113)70 (114)76(109)58 (109)56 (105)26 (105)25 (106)27 (123)22 (113)69(108)52 (115)87 (109)51(105)40 (108)79 (108)49 (108)50 (123)20 (110)81 (108)84(108)82 (111)85 (102)11 (102)12 (110)77(102)13 (110)60(108)44(104)33(102)14 (123)15 (108)48 (108)47(104)36 (123)16 (123)21 (115)95 (111)86 (112)67 (112)66 (112)65 (123)19 (123)18 (108)46(104)35 (108)64 (104)34 (107)45 (107)43 (107)42 (118)96 (118)97 (118)98 (108)93 (116)99 (125)125 (117)278 (106)136 (117)104 (125)126 (117)103 (116)154 (103)146 (116)109 (125)127 (117)168 (116)110 (105)192 (107)149 (115)108 (121)107(121)106 (102)151 (124)271(124)270 (128)268 (128)269 (124)220 (125)228 (127)246(127)230 (127)229 (127)139 (118)165 (118)156 (118)163 (118)162 (118)141 (124)176 (124)175 (118)171 (118)147 (118)144 (126)132 (116)100 (126)140 (126)133 (127)167 (124)145 (124)148 (127)137 (124)157(124)123 (116)197 (128)201 (118)189 (118)190 (128)185 E H ST E J ST MAIN ST I ST OLYMPIC PYH ST03RD AV J ST E ST L ST F ST BAY BLOTAYLAKESRD HUNTEPYBROADWAYK ST E PALOMAR S THILLTOP DR D ST 01ST AV MOSS ST LA MEDIA RDPALOMAR ST05TH AV NAPLES ST TELEGRA P H C A N Y O N RD ANITA ST 02ND AV E L ST E NAPLES S T ORANGE AV G ST C ST HERI TA G E R D LANEAVP R OCTORVALLEYRD PASEO L ADERAB O N IT A RDCLUBH O U S E D R E I ST E OXFORD S T FLOWER ST S RANCHO D E L R E Y PY N R A NCHODELREYPY WUE STERDN 0 2 N D A VN G REEN S V IEWD R E X P L O RATIONFALLSDR PROCTOR VALLEY RD BAY BL E H ST W U E S T E R D02ND AV C ST G ST 05TH AVI ST K ST FLOWER S T 01ST AVHERITAGE RD ANITA STANITA ST WUESTE RDSAN DIEGO S.D. COUNTY CORONADO NATIONAL CITY SAN DIEGO IMPERIAL BEACH S.D. COUNTY LANDFILL S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY (121)263 (128)215 (124)160 (128)209 (106)32 (109)279 (126)130 (126)111 (124)134 (127)138 04TH AVEASTLAKE PY EAS T L A K E P Y BIRCH RD INDUSTR IAL BLBRANDYWINE AVBONITA RDMT M I G U E L R D E ORANG E A V PASEO RANCHEROPASEO DEL REYMEDICAL CENTER DRCREST DRSAN MIGUEL RANCH RD N 04TH AVTIERRA DEL REYE F L O W E R S T E PALOMAR D R ARTISAN ST 03RD AVE 07TH STE NAPLES CT MAIN STMAIN ST 03RD AV HERITAGE RD Figure 2-5 Existing Coordinated Corridors Legend ###System Control Number (###)Communication Number !(Coordinated City Signal !(Non-Coordinated City Signal !(City-Caltrans Coordinated Signal !(Caltrans Traffic Signal City of Chula Vista ñ City Hall Existing Coordinated Corridors BONITA RD BROADWAY E STREET EAST H STREET FIFTH AVE FOURTH AVE H STREET HILLTOP DR L STREET MAIN STREET OLYMPIC PKWY ORANGE AVE ORANGE AVE/OLYMPIC PKWY OTAY LAKES RD PALOMAR ST TELEGRAPH CANYON RD THIRD AVE 0 0.5 10.25 Miles Document Path: S:\Projects\Chula Vista\0347_Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan\04 Design\GIS\MXD Files\Chula Vista Comm MP (10.3).mxd/ 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 72 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 16 2.3.6 Data AcquisiƟon Systems Traffic operations are monitored by City staff regularly and assessed annually by the City’s Growth Management Oversight Commission (GMOC). Data acquisition systems including a small number of Traffic Measurement Devices and are utilized to provide real-time and historical traffic data. Accurate data is imperative to analyzing operational efficiencies and ensuring traffic threshold standards are met. 2.3.6.1 Traffic Measurement Devices The City of Chula Vista’s Growth Management Program seeks to maintain quality of life by monitoring threshold standards for various public facilities and service through the City’s Traffic Monitoring Program (TMP). Traffic thresholds are monitored for Arterial Level of Service (ALOS) and Urban Street Level of Service (ULOS) standards. To acquire necessary traffic data for monitoring and assessment purposes, traffic measurement devices including volume data collection and speed monitoring systems are located throughout Chula Vista. Remote Traffic Microwave Sensors (RTMS) are located at 28 permanent count stations Citywide. 18 in-pavement wireless Sensys detectors are located along Olympic Parkway, East H Street, and Telegraph Canyon Road for arterial travel time (ATT) volume, occupancy, and speed (VOS) data and bicycle activity. Table 2-4 below summarizes traffic measurement device locations by type. Communications to the City’s TSCC is accomplished through a third-party owned cellular network using older 2G technology and data is hosted by an outside party server. Maintenance and operation of the system is increasingly expensive and expansion is cost prohibitive. The system is becoming obsolete and more modern and affordable systems are available on the market. 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 73 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 17 Table 2-4 Traffic Measurement Devices Location Summary RTMS SENSYS STREET LOCATION STREET LOCATION Birch Rd East of Eastlake Pkwy Birch Rd Magdalena Birch Rd Between Magdalena Ave and SR 125 East H St Paso Del Rey Eastlake Pkwy North of Olympic Pkwy East H St Del Rey Blvd Eastlake Pkwy Between Olympic Pkwy and Birch Rd East H St Terra Nova Dr Eastlake Pkwy South of Clubhouse East H St Hidden Valley Eastlake Pkwy Between Otay Lakes Rd and Greensgate Dr Olympic Pkwy Heritage Rd Exploration Falls South of Olympic Pkwy Olympic Pkwy Brandywine Ave Hunte Pkwy North of Otay Lakes Rd Olympic Pkwy Concord Wy Hunte Pkwy Between Otay Lakes Rd and Greesview Olympic Pkwy Oleander Ave Hunte Pkwy Between S Greesview and Olympic Pkwy Otay Lakes Rd Rutgers Ave Hunte Pkwy Between Olympic Pkwy and Evening Star Telegraph Canyon Rd La Medina Rd Hunte Pkwy East of Eastlake Pkwy Telegraph Canyon Rd Buena Vista La Media Rd Between Olympic Pkwy and Birch Rd Telegraph Canyon Rd Paseo Ranchero La Media Rd South of Olympic Pkwy Telegraph Canyon Rd Paseo Ladera Lane Ave Between Mackenzie Creek and Otay Lakes Rd Telegraph Canyon Rd Medical Center Magdalena Ave South of Birch Rd Telegraph Canyon Rd Paseo Del Rey Magdalena Ave North of Birch Rd Telegraph Canyon Rd Oleander Olympic Pkwy Between Hunte Pkwy and Olympic Vista Telegraph Canyon Rd Canyon Plaza Ctr Olympic Pkwy West of Hunte Pkwy Olympic Pkwy East of La Media Otay Lakes Rd Between Hunte Pkwy and Woods Otay Lakes Rd Between Woods and Wueste Rd Otay Lakes Rd Between Eastlake Pkwy and Lane Ave Otay Lakes Rd Between Lane Ave and Hunte Pkwy East Palomar St South of Olympic Pkwy Proctor Valley Rd Between Duncan Ranch Rd and Agua Vista Winding Walk Between Olympic Pkwy and Evening Star Wueste Rd Between Otay Lakes Rd and Olympic Pkwy 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 74 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 18 2.4 Tra ffic OperaƟons Staff The most important resource of the City traffic system are the people who manage, operate, and maintain it. Chula Vista employs staff dedicated to the operation and maintenance of the City’s traffic system including the Traffic Engineering Section and Traffic Operations Group. Staffing organization is illustrated in Figure 2-6 and discussed in the following subsections. Figure 2-6 Traffic Systems Staff Organization Chart CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SECTION 1 Senior Civil Engineer 2 Associate Engineers 1 Senior Engineering Tech 1 Engineering Tech II TRAFFIC OPERATIONS GROUP 1 Traffic Devices Supervisor 3 Traffic Devices Technicians TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SECTION 1 Senior Civil Engineer 2 Associate Engineers 1 Senior Engineering Tech 1 Engineering Tech II TRAFFIC OPERATIONS GROUP 1 Traffic Devices Supervisor 3 Traffic Devices Technicians CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SECTION 1 Senior Civil Engineer 2 Associate Engineers 1 Senior Engineering Tech 1 Engineering Tech II TRAFFIC OPERATIONS GROUP 1 Traffic Devices Supervisor 3 Traffic Devices Technicians 2.4.1 Tra ffic Engineering SecƟon The Traffic Engineering Section is part of the City’s Department of Engineering and Capital Projects. Traffic engineering and operations staff report to the City Traffic Engineer. Traffic Engineering section responsibilities include6: • Development, monitoring, and implementation of traffic improvements in the City. • Assist on all developments and review construction area traffic control plans. • Perform field surveys of high accident and high congestion locations. • Investigate requests from the public, City Council, City Manager, Mayor, and/or community groups for traffic improvements, and initiate remedial and corrective traffic improvements. • Address traffic safety issues in cooperation with the Chula Vista Police Department. • Serve as communication link between residents, City staff, and City Council via the Safety Commission. • Involvement in the Neighborhood Traffic and Pedestrian Safety Program to improve safety for pedestrians, bicyclists, and motoring public within Chula Vista. • Coordinate with regional agencies including SANDAG, MTS, Caltrans, and the Port of San Diego. • Develop, monitor, and implement traffic signal timing. • TMC operation. • Operation and management of the traffic signal communications network. 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 75 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 19 2.4.2 Tra ffic Signal Maintenance Group Traffic systems maintenance is provided by the Traffic Operations Section under the City’s Engineering and Capital Projects Department. Traffic device technicians perform annual preventative maintenance and repairs on both emergency and as-needed basis for traffic signal systems and street lights throughout Chula Vista7. Traffic operations staff report to the City Traffic Engineer. 2.5 CommunicaƟons System Topology and Architecture The traffic systems research and documentation were documented in a Geographic Information System (GIS) database and presented graphically with a corresponding map. ESRI software ArcMap 10.2.2 was utilized and a dynamic layer set with attribute tables were created and include all inventory information researched for inclusion. Shapefiles for traffic signals, conduit, and cellular towers were provided by the City’s GIS department. Existing attribute tables for the shapefiles were supplemented with information obtained from digitized improvement plans and additional City-provided documentation. Table 2-5 summarizes the dynamic layers and inventory information. Examples of the GIS attribute tables that correspond with the dynamic layers are provided in Figures 2-7 through 2-10. Table 2-5 Summary of Inventory Information for Existing Conditions Dynamic Layer Set DYNAMIC LAYER INVENTORY INFORMATION Telephone Drop Traffic Signals Intersection, SCN, Communication Number, Drop Number Offline Telephone Drop Traffic Signals Intersection, SCN, Communication Number, Drop Number Adaptive Traffic Signals Intersection, System Type Existing Traffic Signals Intersection, Operation, Status, SCN, Communication Number, Drop Number, Drawing Number, Signal Modification Date Existing Caltrans Traffic Signals Intersection Traffic Measurement Device Street, Location Description, Type, IP Address, Download Date, 7.4.2, AP, Repeater, Cards, TT, VOS, Bike, Controller Location, Bike Lane Designation, Bike Detection Cards, Bike Detection Sensors City-Owned Wireless Towers Own Status, CA SENO, Applicant, Project Type, Global ID Private Wireless Towers Own Status, CA SENO, Applicant, Project Type, Global ID Existing Copper Street, Interconnect Type, Conduit Size, As-Built Date Existing Wireless Traffic Interconnect Street, Intersection, Communication Type, Brand, Activity Existing Fiber Street, Interconnect Type, Conduit Size, As-Built Date, # of Fibers Existing Empty Conduit Street, Conduit Size, As-Built Date MTS Fiber Interconnect Type, Conduit Size Caltrans Fiber Interconnect Type, Conduit Size 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 76 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 20 DYNAMIC LAYER INVENTORY INFORMATION Port of San Diego Fiber Interconnect Type, Conduit Size City of San Diego Fiber Interconnect Type, Maintenance Date 2.5.1 ExisƟng Tra ffic Systems Topology A Geographic Information System (GIS) database and map was created detailing specifics of communication systems build and location. The resulting map illustrates the topology of traffic systems in the City. Existing traffic systems conditions are mapped on Figure 2-11 and a full size 24x36 fold out plan is provided in Appendix A. 2.5.2 ExisƟng Tra ffic Systems CommunicaƟons Architecture The existing traffic systems communications network is based on low speed multi-drop Serial communications technology over various communications mediums and is comprised of: • Traffic Signal Communications Center located at Chula Vista City Hall. • Single-mode fiber optic lines based digital multi-drop network. • City-owned copper wire based analog multi-drop network. • Leased line analog multi-drop network. • Serial wireless radio communications network. The primary communications system, for approximately 90% of the traffic signals in the City of Chula Vista, is based upon 3rd party leased telephone lines. Table 2-6 provides a summary of the traffic signals by communication type. A schematic detailing the City of Chula Vista’s existing traffic systems communications architecture is provided in Appendix B as a full size 24x36 fold out plan. Table 2-6 Existing Traffic Signal Communications Summary COMMUNICATION TYPE DESCRIPTION # OF INTERSECTIONS Fiber Optic Cable Single-mode fiber optic cable  Ring 1: IFS fiber modems  Ring 2: VLINK fiber modems  Ring 3: VLINK fiber modems 24 4 14 6 Leased Copper Lines Analog modems 91 City-Owned Copper Plant to Leased Copper Lines Analog multi-drop modems SCATS adaptive traffic signals 123 12 Wireless Interconnect Serial wireless radio connections 4 Offline Communications Infrastructure Gap Telephone Drop Repair Needed 11 2 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 77 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 21 Figure 2-7 Existing Traffic Signals Attribute Table Figure 2-8 Existing Copper Interconnect Cable Attribute Table 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 78 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 22 Figure 2-9 Existing Fiber Optic Cable Attribute Table Figure 2-10 Existing Wireless Traffic Interconnect Attribute Table 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 79 (###) (###) (###) (###) ### ### ### ### ### # # # # # # # # ## # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # ## # # # # # # # # ## # # # ### # # # # # # #### # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # ##### # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # ## # # #### # # # ## # ## # # # # # # # # # ## ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç !!!!!!!ñ XY XY XY XY XY XYXY XYXY XY XY XY XY XY XY XY XY XYXY XY XY XY XY XY XYXY XY XY XY XYXYXY XY XYXYXY XY XY XY XY XYXY XYXYXY XY !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( ") ") ")") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ")") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ")") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ")") ") ") ") ") ") ")") ") ") ")") ") ") #* #* #*#*#*#*#*#* #*#* #* #* ") ") !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$508 !"#$508 !"#$508 ·|}þ54·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 E H ST E J ST MAIN ST 04TH AVI ST OLYMPIC PYH ST03RD AV J ST E ST L ST F ST BAY BLOTAYLAKESRD HUNTE PYBROADWAYK ST E PALOMAR S THILLTOP DR D ST 01ST AV MOSS ST LAMEDI ARD PALOMAR ST05TH AV NAPLES ST TE L E GRAPH CA NYONRD ANITA ST 02ND AV E L ST E NAPLES S T ORANGE AV G ST C ST HERI T A G E R DLANEAVP R O C TORVALLEYRD PA S EOLADERA B O N IT A RDCLUB H O U S E D R E I ST EORA N G E A VE OXFORD S T FLOWER S T S RANCHO D E L R E Y PY N R A NCHODELREYPY PASEO D E LREYWUE STERDN 0 2 N D A VN G REEN S V IEWD R E X P L O RATIONFALLSDRCREST DRE F L O W E R S T E PALOMAR D R 01ST AV E H ST W U E S T E R D02ND AV K ST G ST 05TH AVI ST PROCTOR VALLEY RD BAY BL C ST ANITA STANITA ST HERITAGE RDWUESTE RDSAN DIEGO S.D. COUNTY CORONADO NATIONAL CITY SAN DIEGO IMPERIAL BEACH S.D. COUNTY LANDFILL S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY 255115 117 113 114 116 118 173 135 150 128 (112)83(112)80 (113)68 (106)28 (114)73 (113)89 (103)41 (117)94 (117)90 (117)91 (109)31 (114)72 (113)71 (109)55 (108)54 (108)53 (105)24 (113)70 (109)58 (109)56 (106)32 (105)26 (105)25 (106)27 (123)22 (103)23 (113)69(108)52 (109)51(105)40 (108)79 (103)17 (108)49 (108)50(105)39 (104)38(123)20 (110)81 (108)84(108)82 (111)63 (111)85 (102)11 (102)12 (110)77(102)13 (110)78 (108)44(104)33 (123)15 (104)37 (108)48 (108)47(104)36 (123)16 (123)21 (111)86 (112)67 (112)66 (112)65 (123)19 (123)18 (108)46(104)35 (108)64 (104)34 (107)45 (107)43 (118)98 (108)93 (116)99 (125)125 (121)143 (117)286 (114)219 (103)281 (103)280 (117)278 (113)260 (120)217 (120)213 (106)136 (120)121 (117)104 (125)126 (117)105 (117)103 (116)154 (103)146 (125)127 (117)168 (116)110 (125)124 (105)192 (107)149 (115)108 (121)107 (125)142 (117)287 (124)221 (116)102 (120)112 (122)284 (121)263 (121)266 (121)267 (122)244 (124)271(124)270 (128)268 (128)269 (122)259 (122)257(122)256(122)262(122)261 (122)251 (121)248 (121)247 (122)245 (122)243 (122)233 (122)222 (124)253 (124)220 (121)250 (125)228 (103)254 (127)246 (121)224 (121)225 (121)241 (121)240 (121)239 (122)236(122)235 (128)234 (127)229 (121)226 (124)223 (118)218 (120)216 (128)214 (127)139 (118)165 (118)170 (118)174 (118)163 (118)162 (118)141 (118)169 (118)172 (118)183(118)182 (124)179 (124)178 (124)152 (118)171 (118)161 (118)153 (118)147 (118)144 (126)132 (126)131 (126)129 (116)100 (116)101 (126)140 (126)133 (127)167 (128)177 (124)164 (124)145 (128)181 (124)148 (127)138 (127)137 (124)158 (124)157(124)123(120)120 (115)159 (118)199 (116)197 (124)195 (128)202 (128)203 (128)201 (118)189 (124)211 (101)206(118)190 (128)200 (128)185 (128)204 (128)196 (116)193 (128)194 (128)186 (128)205 (124)191 (124)187 (124)208 (124)188 (124)184 EASTLAKE PY EAS T L A K E P Y BIRCH RD INDUSTR IAL BLBRANDYWINE AVBONITA R D MT M I G U E L R D FLOWER ST PASEO RANCHEROMEDICAL CENTER DRSAN MIGUEL RANCH RD N 04TH AVTIERRA DEL REYARTISAN ST 03RD AVE 07TH STE NAPLES CT HERITAGE RD MAIN STMAIN ST 03RD AV 119 (115)92 (106)29 (109)57(103)30 (114)75 (114)74 (114)76 (114)59 (113)88 (115)87 (110)61 (110)60 (102)14 (115)95 (110)62 (107)42 (118)96 (118)97 (122)265 (122)283 (122)285(122)288 (109)279 (116)109 (121)106 (102)151 (122)282 (128)273 (121)264 (122)237 (122)238 (122)252 (128)258 (121)227 (128)215 (121)242 (127)230 (118)156 (118)166 (124)176 (124)175 (126)130 (120)122 (126)111 (124)155 (124)134 (124)160 (122)207 (128)209 (121)198 Figure 2-11 Existing Traffic Systems Communications Network Legend ###System Control Number (###)Communication Number ")Offline Telephone Drop Traffic Signals ")Telephone Drop Traffic Signals #*Existing Adaptive Traffic Signals !(Existing Traffic Signal !(Offline Existing Traffic Signal !(Caltrans Traffic Signal XY Traffic Measurement Device #Ç City-Owned Wireless Towers #Private Wireless Towers Existing Copper ! !Existing Wireless Traffic Interconnect Existing Fiber Existing Empty Conduit City of San Diego Fiber MTS Fiber Caltrans Fiber Port of San Diego Fiber City of Chula Vista ñ City Hall 0 0.5 10.25 Miles Document Path: S:\Projects\Chula Vista\0347_Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan\04 Design\GIS\MXD Files\Chula Vista Comm MP (10.3).mxd/ 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 80 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 24 2.5.3 Regional CommunicaƟons Infrastructure Existing communications facilities for regional agencies including the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG), San Diego Metropolitan Transit System (MTS), California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) District 11, and the Port of San Diego were obtained from the regional Fiber Working Group (FWG) documentation. Existing and future Port of San Diego fiber locations were researched from the Bayfront Master Plan. The Port of San Diego is currently developing a fiber master plan that will complete a fiber optic ring around the San Diego Bay area. The architecture is built based on a core ring concept that will provide high-speed network entry points for the entire area. SANDAG is upgrading the RAMS system connectivity between each agency in the region to a new fiber optic lease connection with 2 Mbps speed. Fiber optic communications routes for each regional agency is mapped on the Master Plan map and assigned to separate unique dynamic layers within the GIS geodatabase. 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 81 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 25 3 Needs Assessment The traffic systems communications needs assessment is based on two primary criteria: existing system deficiencies that require more immediate attention and the needs of the long-term future transportation network. Existing system deficiencies and needs have been identified through an extensive review of the existing conditions including the traffic communications system, central systems, ITS elements, and traffic operations. The City’s future transportation network was researched to identify the new infrastructure needs and subsequently prioritize opportunities to improve the traffic communication system. New roads and traffic signals provide opportunities to expand, modernize, or build new communications system technology and infrastructure that meet both immediate and future needs. The communications system needs include considerations for speed, bandwidth, reliability, redundancy, networking capabilities, gaps in communication due to infrastructure and/ or media deficiencies, and new locations requiring service. The following sections present the existing system deficiency identification and future roadway network assessment. 3.1 Stakeholder Outreach Outreach and coordination meetings were conducted with several other City departments to acquire additional information and documentation on existing and future traffic systems in the City. The City’s Geographic Information System (GIS) Department provided relevant GIS shapefiles and information. The Information Technology (IT) Department provided information on communications connectivity within the City’s Traffic Signal Communications Center (TSCC) and existing and future system support requirements. Staff from the City’s Development Services Department and Economic Development Department provided documentation and information for both in-construction and future improvement projects and master plans throughout the City that will affect traffic systems in Chula Vista. Additionally, SANDAG’s 2050 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) Revenue Constrained Plan for Arterial Projects was researched. 3.2 Deﬁciency IdenƟﬁcaƟon Communications deficiencies have been identified for traffic communications, central systems, field elements, and traffic operations based upon analysis of the existing communications systems conditions. Existing communications media and protocols, both City-owned and leased, currently limit the City’s ability to monitor and manage traffic systems in real-time. Deficiencies and needs were identified based on the capabilities of the existing elements and the functionality necessary to efficiently and effectively operate the various systems and operations. 3.2.1 Tra ffic CommunicaƟons System Deﬁciencies Communications system deficiencies were identified and are listed as follows. • Existing single-mode fiber optic network utilizes low speed (1,200 bps) Serial communications. 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 82 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 26 • Existing wireless radio communications are Serial and have low bandwidth capabilities. • Extensive gaps in City-owned communication infrastructure due to missing physical connections centrally and/ or locally. Only 24 of the City’s 267 existing traffic signals have a physical link to the TSCC. • Leased communications are costly, reliant on the third-party owner for communications repairs, and have limited communications capabilities such as low-speeds, low-bandwidth, and are analog-based. Approximately 90% of the City’s existing traffic signals communicate on leased lines, limiting the entire traffic signal communications network to analog. • Operation and maintenance costs for the existing leased line telecommunications network is expensive, currently costing the City approximately $75,000 per year, and incapable for supporting existing and future traffic systems and ITS applications. • Two traffic signals are offline and unable to communicate with the City’s TSCC through leased line communications due to the third-party owner’s inability to make adequate repairs to the network. • Video detection feeds are unable to be viewed remotely due to physical gaps in communication infrastructure to the TSCC and bandwidth limitations associated with leased line communications and/ or Serial wireless radio communications. • Existing traffic signal communications system bandwidth is unable to accommodate current and future high bandwidth required by ITS applications such as real-time video monitoring of the traffic on the city streets. • Modern devices with desired capabilities do not support the legacy communication protocols. 3.2.2 Central Systems Deﬁciencies The City remodeled and built a new TSCC data center and Traffic Management Center through a separate design-build task with STC Traffic. The project was completed in early 2017 and resolved the primary central systems deficiencies. Remaining central system deficiencies were identified as follows. • The QuicNet4+ Regional Arterial Management System (RAMS) currently utilized is outdated and does not offer the functionality provided in modern systems that are becoming industry standard. It is also unable to communicate with Advanced Traffic Controllers (ATC). • The Sydney Coordinated Adaptive Traffic System (SCATS) is outdated and subject to down time due to the legacy protocols, low-speed (1,200 bps) connection, and bandwidth limitations associated with leased line communications. The SCATS system is no longer operational. The two remaining central system deficiencies are being resolved through implementation of two new state-of-the-art systems in 2017, (1) a new Transparity RAMS system and (2) a new central traffic management system (ATMS.now) and SynchroGreen™ Adaptive Traffic Control System (ATCS). 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 83 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 27 3.2.3 Field Elements and Tra ffic OperaƟons Deﬁciencies The City uses multiple systems and strategies to manage traffic operations throughout Chula Vista including traffic signal timing and coordination, grade crossing preemption, emergency vehicle preemption, transit signal priority, and data acquisition. Each system has been reviewed and deficiencies identified include: • There are 22 existing coordinated corridors throughout the City. Many have inconsistent coordination plans. This is a symptom of a lack of reliable communications to traffic signals to monitor and verify that signal timing is as designed and TOD plans are providing efficient and effective traffic progression. • Type 170 controllers are outdated and do not provide modern communication protocols or functionality required to perform advanced traffic operations. • Emergency Vehicle Preemption equipment is antiquated (up to 15 years old), Infrared-based, relies on line-of-sight, and is susceptible to illegal emitters. Unauthorized preemption drastically impacts coordinated corridors, as recovery can take a significant amount of time, causing unnecessary impacts to traffic signal operations on critical corridors throughout Chula Vista. • Traffic measurement devices currently communicate through a third-party owned cellular network and the traffic data is hosted through an outside party server. • Traffic signals lack stand-alone battery back-up units for emergency power during power outages. • Field elements lack the ability to communicate with the element, view the element status, and remotely manage and control the element. • City staff does not have the communication system necessary to monitor and control traffic in real time through video and data acquisition. 3.2.4 CommunicaƟons Gap IdenƟﬁcaƟon Gaps in communications infrastructure were identified through analysis of the Master Plan GIS map, which geographically presents the existing traffic systems. Although the City currently has established communications to approximately 95% of the 267 existing traffic signals, only 9% are communicating on City-owned infrastructure and the remaining traffic signals communicate via leased lines. The high operating and maintenance costs associated with these leased lines, as well as the limited communication capabilities due to obsolete technology, makes the existing communications network an impractical and unsustainable model for the City of Chula Vista’s existing and future transportation system needs. Communications gap identification includes considerations for gaps between traffic signals locally and gaps between traffic signals and the TMC. Based on the existing communications system in Chula Vista, gaps were categorized as follows: • Gaps due to lack of infrastructure. • Gaps due to leased infrastructure. • Gaps due to combination of leased and City-owned infrastructure. 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 84 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 28 3.2.4.1 Infrastructure Gaps Gaps due to a lack of infrastructure include signalized locations with no existing City-owned or leased communications infrastructure. There are 13 offline traffic signals in the City that cannot be monitored remotely from the TMC and City staff must be dispatched to verify signal operations in the field. This is an inefficient use of both City time and resources. Of the 13 offline traffic signals, 11 are caused by gaps in communication infrastructure and 2 are leased infrastructure locations that require repairs. 3.2.4.2 Leased Gaps Gaps due to leased infrastructure include signalized intersections that communicate with the TMC through a third-party owned POTS leased network. There are 102 telephone drop traffic signals, including 11 SCATS signals, in the City with the majority located in the downtown area between I-5 and I-805. 3.2.4.3 Combination Infrastructure and Leased Gaps Communications gaps that are caused by a combination of leased and City-owned infrastructure include traffic signals that are interconnected by City-owned twisted pair copper wire to a traffic signal communicating on leased lines. These signals are currently connected to telephone drops due to a lack of a direct communications link to the City’s TMC. There are 124 traffic signals, including 1 SCATS signal, on the City-owned copper wire based analog multi-drop network. Table 3-1 provides a summary of the traffic signal communication system deficiencies and Figure 3-1 presents the City’s communications gaps1. Table 3-1 Traffic Signal Communications Infrastructure and Deficiencies Summary Number DESCRIPTION QUANTITY - City of Chula Vista Total 267 1 Analog Fiber Optic Communication 24 2 Serial Wireless Radio Communication 4 3 Leased Copper-Based Communication 102 4 City-Owned Infrastructure on Leased Copper-Based Communication 124 5 No Communication Due to Infrastructure Gap 11 6 No Communication Due to Leased Infrastructure Repair 2 7 Analog Video Detection 155 8 Lack of Remote CCTV Monitoring 267 9 Lack of Limited Service and/or Post-Preemption Sequence 5 10 IR-Based Emergency Vehicle Preemption 267 11 Leased Cellular-Based Communications 46* 12 Type 170 Controllers 255 13 Lack of Stand-Alone Battery Back-Up 267 *Traffic Measurement Devices are located nearby signalized intersections 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 85 (###) (###) (###) (###) ### ### ### ### ###!!!!!! ! !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( XY XY XY XY XY XYXY XYXY XY XY XY XY XY XY XY XY XYXY XY XY XY XY XY XYXY XY XY XY XYXYXY XY XYXYXY XY XY XY XY XYXY XYXYXY XY ñ !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( ") ") ")") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ")") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ")") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ")") ") ") ") ") ") ")") ") ") ")") ") ") !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$508 !"#$508 !"#$508 ·|}þ54·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 E H ST E J ST MAIN ST 04TH AVI ST OLYMPIC PYH ST03RD AV J ST E ST L ST F ST BAY BLOTAYLAKESRD HUNTE PYBROADWAYK ST E PALOMAR S THILLTOP DR D ST 01ST AV MOSS ST LAMEDI ARD PALOMAR ST05TH AV NAPLES ST TE L E GRAPH CA NYONRD ANITA ST 02ND AV E L ST E NAPLES S T ORANGE AV G ST C ST HERI T A G E R DLANEAVP R O C TORVALLEYRD PA S EOLADERA B O N IT A RDCLUB H O U S E D R E I ST EORA N G E A VE OXFORD S T FLOWER S T S RANCHO D E L R E Y PY N R A NCHODELREYPY PASEO D E LREYWUE STERDN 0 2 N D A VN G REEN S V IEWD R E X P L O RATIONFALLSDRCREST DRE F L O W E R S T E PALOMAR D R 01ST AV E H ST W U E S T E R D02ND AV K ST G ST 05TH AVI ST PROCTOR VALLEY RD BAY BL C ST ANITA STANITA ST HERITAGE RDWUESTE RDSAN DIEGO S.D. COUNTY CORONADO NATIONAL CITY SAN DIEGO IMPERIAL BEACH S.D. COUNTY LANDFILL S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY 255115 117 113 114 116 118 173 135 150 128 (112)83(112)80 (113)68 (106)28 (114)73 (113)89 (103)41 (117)94 (117)90 (117)91 (109)31 (114)72 (113)71 (109)55 (108)54 (108)53 (105)24 (113)70 (109)58 (109)56 (106)32 (105)26 (105)25 (106)27 (123)22 (103)23 (113)69(108)52 (109)51(105)40 (108)79 (103)17 (108)49 (108)50(105)39 (104)38(123)20 (110)81 (108)84(108)82 (111)63 (111)85 (102)11 (102)12 (110)77(102)13 (110)78 (108)44(104)33 (123)15 (104)37 (108)48 (108)47(104)36 (123)16 (123)21 (111)86 (112)67 (112)66 (112)65 (123)19 (123)18 (108)46(104)35 (108)64 (104)34 (107)45 (107)43 (118)98 (108)93 (116)99 (125)125 (121)143 (117)286 (114)219 (103)281 (103)280 (117)278 (113)260 (120)217 (120)213 (106)136 (120)121 (117)104 (125)126 (117)105 (117)103 (116)154 (103)146 (125)127 (117)168 (116)110 (125)124 (105)192 (107)149 (115)108 (121)107 (125)142 (117)287 (124)221 (116)102 (120)112 (122)284 (121)263 (121)266 (121)267 (122)244 (124)271(124)270 (128)268 (128)269 (122)259 (122)257(122)256(122)262(122)261 (122)251 (121)248 (121)247 (122)245 (122)243 (122)233 (122)222 (124)253 (124)220 (121)250 (125)228 (103)254 (127)246 (121)224 (121)225 (121)241 (121)240 (121)239 (122)236(122)235 (128)234 (127)229 (121)226 (124)223 (118)218 (120)216 (128)214 (127)139 (118)165 (118)170 (118)174 (118)163 (118)162 (118)141 (118)169 (118)172 (118)183(118)182 (124)179 (124)178 (124)152 (118)171 (118)161 (118)153 (118)147 (118)144 (126)132 (126)131 (126)129 (116)100 (116)101 (126)140 (126)133 (127)167 (128)177 (124)164 (124)145 (128)181 (124)148 (127)138 (127)137 (124)158 (124)157(124)123(120)120 (115)159 (118)199 (116)197 (124)195 (128)202 (128)203 (128)201 (118)189 (124)211 (101)206(118)190 (128)200 (128)185 (128)204 (128)196 (116)193 (128)194 (128)186 (128)205 (124)191 (124)187 (124)208 (124)188 (124)184 EASTLAKE PY EAS T L A K E P Y BIRCH RD INDUSTR IAL BLBRANDYWINE AVBONITA R D MT M I G U E L R D FLOWER ST PASEO RANCHEROMEDICAL CENTER DRSAN MIGUEL RANCH RD N 04TH AVTIERRA DEL REYARTISAN ST 03RD AVE 07TH STE NAPLES CT HERITAGE RD MAIN STMAIN ST 03RD AV 119 (115)92 (106)29 (109)57(103)30 (114)75 (114)74 (114)76 (114)59 (113)88 (115)87 (110)61 (110)60 (102)14 (115)95 (110)62 (107)42 (118)96 (118)97 (122)265 (122)283 (122)285(122)288 (109)279 (116)109 (121)106 (102)151 (122)282 (128)273 (121)264 (122)237 (122)238 (122)252 (128)258 (121)227 (128)215 (121)242 (127)230 (118)156 (118)166 (124)176 (124)175 (126)130 (120)122 (126)111 (124)155 (124)134 (124)160 (122)207 (128)209 (121)198 Figure 3-1 Communication Gaps Legend ###System Control Number (###)Communication Number !(Communication Infrastructure Gap ")Signal - Leased Infrastructure !(Signal - City Infrastructure !(Signal - No Infrastructure XY TMD - Leased Infrastructure Existing Copper Existing Fiber ! !Existing Wireless Traffic Interconnect Future Fiber Primary Fiber Optic Ring Infrastructure Gap City of Chula Vista ñ City Hall 0 0.5 10.25 Miles Document Path: S:\Projects\Chula Vista\0347_Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan\04 Design\GIS\MXD Files\Chula Vista Comm MP Phase Implementation.mxd/ 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 86 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 30 3.3 Future Roadway Projects Relevant information for future roadway projects throughout Chula Vista was researched in documentation provided by the City’s Public Works, Engineering and Development Services Departments. The documents provided information on new traffic signals, new roadways, and planned roadway widenings. The documents researched include: • Otay Ranch Villages Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plans. • University Villages Project Environmental Impact Report (EIR). • Bayfront Master Plan. • Chula Vista Main Street Streetscape Master Plan. • Urban Core Specific Plan. The City of Chula Vista General Plan organizes the City into a hierarchy of geographic areas for policy purposes. From the largest to the smallest, the areas include: Planning Area, Subarea, District, and Focus Area. Chula Vista’s four Planning Areas are: Bayfront, Northwest, Southwest, and East. Each planning area has an Area Plan that is incorporated into the Land Use and Transportation Element. Research was conducted for planned projects that would impact Chula Vista’s future roadway network. 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 87 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 31 3.3.1 Future Tra ffic Signals Research of the above documentation identified 96 traffic signals that are planned for future construction. The future traffic signals were documented on a dynamic layer in GIS with the attribute table detailing the intersection location. The following are the developments associated with the future traffic signals. • The Chula Vista Bayfront Master Plan (CVMBP) is a joint master plan by the Port of San Diego, City of Chula Vista, and Pacifica Companies to develop a 500-plus acre public area along the San Diego Bay. Seven new traffic signals will be installed in the Bayfront area2. • The Chula Vista Main Street Streetscape Master Plan develops a Complete Street plan for Main Street between Industrial Boulevard and the I-805. The roadway plan identifies 6 new signalized intersections along Main Street between Jacqua Street and Otay Valley Road/ Maple Drive3. • The Eastern area of the City has developed thousands of acres of formerly undeveloped land since the mid-1970s. The area comprises six master planned communities including: Sunbow, Rancho del Rey, Eastlake, Rolling Hills Ranch, San Miguel Ranch, and Otay Ranch. Five of the six communities are either built-out or nearing completion. Otay Ranch is in the development process and is the largest master planned community in Chula Vista with 83 planned new traffic signals4. 3.3.2 Future Tra ffic CommunicaƟons Systems The City plans to construct several new traffic system communications paths. The following describes the future paths by communications medium. 3.3.2.1 Future Copper Wire Interconnect New copper wire based interconnect will be installed to close the communications infrastructure gap between East H Street/ Tierra Del Rey and East H Street/Paseo Ranchero on the future adaptive traffic signals project identified in Section 3.3.35. 3.3.2.2 Future Single-mode Fiber Interconnect New fiber routes will be constructed in conjunction with the following projects: • The South Bay Rapid project installs new City-owned conduit and single-mode fiber optic cable along portions of I-805, East Palomar Street, Eastlake Parkway, Birch Road, and SR-125. • The Main Street Fiber Optic Project installs new conduit and fiber, with City-owned inner-duct and dedicated fiber, along Main Street from Industrial Boulevard to SR-125. • In the Rancho Del Rey area, new conduit and single-mode fiber optic cable will be installed along portions of North Rancho Del Rey Parkway, South Rancho Del Rey Parkway, Ridgeback Road, Otay Lakes Road, East H Street, and Corral Canyon Road. 3.3.2.3 Future Wireless Interconnect New wireless interconnect will be installed at the following locations: 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 88 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 32 • Industrial Boulevard and L Street (Drop) to Industrial Boulevard and Naples Street. • 4th Avenue and L Street (Existing Fiber) to Hilltop Drive and L Street. • 3rd Avenue and H Street (Existing Fiber) to 3rd Avenue and I Street. 3.3.3 Future AdapƟve Tra ffic Control System Grant funding from the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) will implement an Adaptive Traffic Control System (ATCS) at 28 signalized intersections on East H Street, Paseo Ranchero, Otay Lakes Road, and Telegraph Canyon Road. Twelve of the 28 project signals are existing SCATS signals that are being replaced with the new AT SC system and 16 are non-adaptive signals. The traffic signal communications will be upgraded to an Ethernet/IP network. The SynchroGreen™ ATCS system was selected and implementation is anticipated in mid to late 2017. 3.3.4 Future Coordinated Corridors Four new traffic signal coordination networks are planned, in addition to the 22 existing corridors on the streets listed below and shown on Figure 3-2. • East H Street: Bonita Vista High School Driveway to Eastlake Drive. • Eastlake Parkway: Greensgate Drive to Commercial Driveway. • East Palomar Street: I-805 to Olympic Parkway. • Otay Lakes Road: Allen School Lane to Bonita Vista Middle School Driveway. 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 89 (###) (###) (###) (###) ### ### ### ### ### ñ !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$508 !"#$508 !"#$508 ·|}þ54·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 150 119 (103)30 (103)41 (114)59 (113)88(103)23 (103)17 (110)61 (105)39 (104)38 (111)63 (110)78 (104)37 (110)62 (122)265 (122)283 (122)285(122)288 (121)143 (117)286 (114)219 (103)281 (103)280 (113)260 (120)217 (120)213 (120)121 (117)105 (125)124 (125)142 (117)287 (124)221 (116)102 (120)112 (122)284 (122)282 (128)273 (121)264 (121)266 (121)267 (122)244 (122)237 (122)238 (122)259 (122)257(122)256(122)262(122)261 (122)251 (121)248 (121)247 (122)245 (122)243 (122)233 (122)252 (122)222 (128)258 (124)253 (121)250 (121)227 (103)254 (121)224 (121)225 (121)242 (121)241 (121)240 (121)239 (122)236(122)235 (128)234 (121)226 (124)223 (118)218 (120)216 (128)214 (118)170 (118)166 (118)174 (118)169 (118)172 (118)183(118)182 (124)179 (124)178 (124)152 (118)161 (118)153 (126)131 (126)129 (120)122 (116)101 (124)155 (128)177 (124)164 (128)181 (124)158 (120)120 (115)159 (118)199 (124)195 (128)202 (128)203 (124)211 (101)206 (122)207 (128)200 (128)204 (128)196 (116)193 (128)194 (128)186 (128)205 (124)191 (124)187 (124)208 (124)188 (124)184 (121)198 255115 117 113 114 116 118 173 135 128 (112)83(112)80 (113)68 (115)92 (106)29 (106)28 (109)57 (114)75 (114)73 (113)89 (117)94 (117)90 (117)91 (114)74 (109)31 (114)72 (113)71 (109)55 (108)54 (108)53 (105)24 (113)70 (114)76(109)58 (109)56 (105)26 (105)25 (106)27 (123)22 (113)69(108)52 (115)87 (109)51(105)40 (108)79 (108)49 (108)50 (123)20 (110)81 (108)84(108)82 (111)85 (102)11 (102)12 (110)77(102)13 (110)60(108)44(104)33(102)14 (123)15 (108)48 (108)47(104)36 (123)16 (123)21 (115)95 (111)86 (112)67 (112)66 (112)65 (123)19 (123)18 (108)46(104)35 (108)64 (104)34 (107)45 (107)43 (107)42 (118)96 (118)97 (118)98 (108)93 (116)99 (125)125 (117)278 (106)136 (117)104 (125)126 (117)103 (116)154 (103)146 (116)109 (125)127 (117)168 (116)110 (105)192 (107)149 (115)108 (121)107(121)106 (102)151 (124)271(124)270 (128)268 (128)269 (124)220 (125)228 (127)246(127)230 (127)229 (127)139 (118)165 (118)156 (118)163 (118)162 (118)141 (124)176 (124)175 (118)171 (118)147 (118)144 (126)132 (116)100 (126)140 (126)133 (127)167 (124)145 (124)148 (127)137 (124)157(124)123 (116)197 (128)201 (118)189 (118)190 (128)185 E H ST E J ST MAIN ST I ST OLYMPIC PYH ST03RD AV J ST E ST L ST F ST BAY BLOTAYLAKESRD HUNTEPYBROADWAYK ST E PALOMAR S THILLTOP DR D ST 01ST AV MOSS ST LA MEDIA RDPALOMAR ST05TH AV NAPLES ST TELEGRA P H C A N Y O N RD ANITA ST 02ND AV E L ST E NAPLES S T ORANGE AV G ST C ST HERI TA G E R D LANEAVP R OCTORVALLEYRD PASEO L ADERAB O N IT A RDCLUBH O U S E D R E I ST E OXFORD S T FLOWER ST S RANCHO D E L R E Y PY N R A NCHODELREYPY WUE STERDN 0 2 N D A VN G REEN S V IEWD R E X P L O RATIONFALLSDR PROCTOR VALLEY RD BAY BL E H ST W U E S T E R D02ND AV C ST G ST 05TH AVI ST K ST FLOWER S T 01ST AVHERITAGE RD ANITA STANITA ST WUESTE RDSAN DIEGO S.D. COUNTY CORONADO NATIONAL CITY SAN DIEGO IMPERIAL BEACH S.D. COUNTY LANDFILL S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY (121)263 (128)215 (124)160 (128)209 (106)32 (109)279 (126)130 (126)111 (124)134 (127)138 04TH AVEASTLAKE PY EAS T L A K E P Y BIRCH RD INDUSTR IAL BLBRANDYWINE AVBONITA RDMT M I G U E L R D E ORANG E A V PASEO RANCHEROPASEO DEL REYMEDICAL CENTER DRCREST DRSAN MIGUEL RANCH RD N 04TH AVTIERRA DEL REYE F L O W E R S T E PALOMAR D R ARTISAN ST 03RD AVE 07TH STE NAPLES CT MAIN STMAIN ST 03RD AV HERITAGE RD Figure 3-2 Future Coordinated Corridors Legend ###System Control Number (###)Communication Number !(Coordinated City Signal !(Non-Coordinated City Signal !(Future Coordinated City Signal !(City-Caltrans Coordinated Signal !(Caltrans Traffic Signal City of Chula Vista ñ City Hall Existing Coordinated Corridors BONITA RD BROADWAY E STREET EAST H STREET FIFTH AVE FOURTH AVE H STREET HILLTOP DR L STREET MAIN STREET OLYMPIC PKWY ORANGE AVE ORANGE AVE/OLYMPIC PKWY OTAY LAKES RD PALOMAR ST TELEGRAPH CANYON RD THIRD AVE Future Coordinated Corridors EAST H ST EAST PALOMAR EASTLAKE PKWY OTAY LAKES RD 0 0.5 10.25 Miles Document Path: S:\Projects\Chula Vista\0347_Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan\04 Design\GIS\MXD Files\Chula Vista Comm MP (10.3).mxd/ 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 90 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 34 3.3.5 Future Roadways The Otay Ranch Villages Sectional Planning Area (SPA) plans and documentation provided by the City’s Public Works and Engineering Departments were researched for future roadway construction. The new roadways are anticipated in the East subarea for Otay Ranch Villages 3, 8 East, 8 West, 9, and 10. A dynamic layer in GIS documents the location, street names, and associated project in the attribute table. 3.3.6 Future Roadway Widening Specific Plans and Master Plans throughout the City were researched to identify future roadway widening projects which can provide potential opportunities to expand the traffic communications systems infrastructure. The Chula Vista Urban Core Specific Plan Mobility Element Section 3 outlined Future Conditions and Street Improvement Opportunities including: • Widening of E Street between Woodlawn Avenue and I-5 to serve traffic needs, reduce queues in the westbound direction, and improve operations at the I-5 Northbound ramp at Woodlawn Avenue. • Widening of H Street from 3rd Avenue to Broadway to accommodate buildout traffic, improve segment operations, and reach the ultimate classification of H Street per the General Plan. • Widening of Broadway between E Street and F Street to accommodate a consistent configuration along Broadway between C Street and L Street including a raised medians and bike lanes. Appendix C contains the complete list of future transportation projects and traffic signals within the City. 3.4 SANDAG 2050 RTP The SANDAG 2050 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) was referenced to gather information on future roadway projects that are planned to be constructed over the next 33 years. RTP Appendix A (2050 RTP Projects, Costs, and Phasing) was researched to obtain additional information for each respective project. Due to funding limitations and uncertainties, only arterial projects contained in the revenue constrained plan were inventoried. Within the City of Chula Vista, two projects have been identified and summarized in Table A.8 (Phased Arterial Projects – Revenue Constrained Plan) including: • Willow Street Bridge Project: Replace and widen the existing bridge, including shoulders, on Willow Street from Bonita Road to Sweetwater Road. This project is currently in construction. • North Fourth Avenue and Brisbane Street Project: Widen Fourth Avenue to add an additional lane on the east side of the roadway. The Future Road Network for the City of Chula Vista is illustrated in Figure 3-3. 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 91 (###) (###) (###) (###) ### ### ### ### ###!!!!!!!!!!!!ñ !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( #* #* #*#*#*#*#*#* #*#* #* #* #*#*#*#*#*#*#* #* #* #* #* #*#* #*#*#* #* #*#* !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$508 !"#$508 !"#$508 ·|}þ54·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 E H ST E J ST MAIN ST 04TH AVI ST OLYMPIC PYH ST03RD AV J ST E ST L ST F ST BAY BLOTAYLAKESRD HUNTE PYBROADWAYK ST E PALOMAR S THILLTOP DR D ST 01ST AV MOSS ST LAMEDI ARD PALOMAR ST05TH AV NAPLES ST TE L E GRAPH CA NYONRD ANITA ST 02ND AV E L ST E NAPLES S T ORANGE AV G ST C ST HERI T A G E R DLANEAVPROCTOR VALLEY RD PA S EOLADERA B O N IT A RDCLUB H O U S E D R E I ST EORA N G E A VE OXFORD S T FLOWER S T S RANCHO D E L R E Y PY N R A NCHODELREYPY PASEO D E LREYWUE STERDN 0 2 N D A VN G REEN S V IEWD R E X P L O RATIONFALLSDRCREST DRE F L O W E R S T E PALOMAR D R E H ST W U E S T E R D 05TH AV K ST02ND AVHERITAGE RDI ST 01ST AVBAY BL G ST ANITA STANITA ST 03RD AVC ST WUESTE RDMAIN KJ HERITAGEMONTACETRIBUTARYMAIN W BS T R E E T " A "SR 125 S A N T A M A R I S O L ARI OTAY VALLEY U N I V E R S I T Y STREET "E"STREET "I"STREET "D"S A N T A D A V I S S A N T A T I PO DI S C O V E R Y F A L L S SA N T A M A C H E T O CAR AWA Y STREET "F"CALLE SWANS E A SOLS T ICE STREET "D"SR 125MAINSR 1 2 5 OTAY VALLEY MAIN SAN DIEGO S.D. COUNTY CORONADO NATIONAL CITY SAN DIEGO IMPERIAL BEACH S.D. COUNTY LANDFILL S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY 255115 117 114 116 118 173 135 150 128 (112)83(112)80 (113)68 (106)28 (114)73 (113)89 (103)41 (117)94 (117)90 (117)91 (109)31 (114)72 (113)71 (109)55 (108)54 (108)53 (105)24 (113)70 (109)58 (109)56 (106)32 (105)26 (105)25 (106)27 (123)22 (103)23 (113)69(108)52 (109)51(105)40 (108)79 (103)17 (108)49 (108)50(105)39 (104)38(123)20 (110)81 (108)84(108)82 (111)63 (111)85 (102)11 (102)12 (110)77(102)13 (110)78 (108)44(104)33 (123)15 (104)37 (108)48 (108)47(104)36 (123)16 (123)21 (111)86 (112)67 (112)66 (112)65 (123)19 (123)18 (108)46(104)35 (108)64 (104)34 (107)45 (107)43 (118)98 (108)93 (116)99 (125)125 (121)143 (117)286 (114)219 (103)281 (103)280 (117)278 (113)260 (120)217 (120)213 (106)136 (120)121 (117)104 (125)126 (117)105 (117)103 (116)154 (103)146 (125)127 (117)168 (116)110 (125)124 (105)192 (107)149 (115)108 (121)107 (125)142 (117)287 (124)221 (116)102 (120)112 (122)284 (121)263 (121)266 (121)267 (122)244 (124)271(124)270 (128)268 (128)269 (122)257(122)256(122)262(122)261 (122)251 (121)248 (121)247 (122)245 (122)243 (122)233 (122)222 (124)253 (124)220 (121)250 (125)228 (103)254 (127)246 (121)224 (121)225 (121)242 (121)241 (121)240 (121)239 (122)236(122)235 (128)234 (127)229 (121)226 (124)223 (118)218 (120)216 (128)214 (127)139 (118)165 (118)170 (118)174 (118)163 (118)162 (118)141 (118)169 (118)172 (118)183(118)182 (124)179 (124)178 (124)152 (118)171 (118)161 (118)153 (118)147 (118)144 (126)132 (126)131 (126)129 (116)100 (116)101 (126)140 (126)133 (127)167 (128)177 (124)164 (124)145 (128)181 (124)148 (127)138 (127)137 (124)158 (124)157(124)123(120)120 (115)159 (118)199 (116)197 (124)195 (128)202 (128)203 (128)201 (118)189 (124)211 (101)206(118)190 (128)200 (128)185 (128)204 (128)196 (116)193 (128)194 (128)186 (128)205 (124)191 (124)187 (124)208 (124)188 (124)184 EASTLAKE PY EAS T L A K E P Y BIRCH RD INDUSTR IAL BL PROCTOR VALLEY RD BRANDYWINE AVBONITA R D MT M I G U E L R D FLOWER ST PASEO RANCHEROMEDICAL CENTER DRSAN MIGUEL RANCH RD N 04TH AVTIERRA DEL REYARTISAN ST 03RD AVE 07TH STE NAPLES CT MAIN ST HERITAGE RD MAIN ST 113 119 (115)92 (106)29 (109)57(103)30 (114)75 (114)74 (114)76 (114)59 (113)88 (115)87 (110)61 (110)60 (102)14 (115)95 (110)62 (107)42 (118)96 (118)97 (122)265 (122)283 (122)285(122)288 (109)279 (116)109 (121)106 (102)151 (122)282 (128)273 (121)264 (122)237 (122)238 (122)259 (122)252 (128)258 (121)227 (128)215 (127)230 (118)156 (118)166 (124)176 (124)175 (126)130 (120)122 (126)111 (124)155 (124)134 (124)160 (122)207 (128)209 (121)198 Figure 3-3 Future Roadway Network Legend ###System Control Number (###)Communication Number #*Existing Adaptive Traffic Signal #*Future Adaptive Traffic Signal !(Existing Traffic Signal !(Offline Existing Traffic Signal !(Future Traffic Signal Future Copper ! !Future Wireless Traffic Interconnect Caltrans Fiber Future Roads Future Roadway Widening City of Chula Vista ñ City Hall 0 0.5 10.25 Miles Document Path: S:\Projects\Chula Vista\0347_Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan\04 Design\GIS\MXD Files\Chula Vista Comm MP Phase Implementation.mxd/ 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 92 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 36 4 Future System Architecture and ITS Elements The future City traffic signal communication system architecture will link all system elements creating one ubiquitous network on which all devices will communicate. The Master Plan architecture is conceived as a reliable and future-proof network that will meet any City transportation system need. This section presents the network and ITS elements, standardization, topology, physical and logical requirements to achieve the future communication system concept. Several architecture examples are provided to demonstrate system connectivity and resiliency. This section also presents the communication system relation to Chula Vista Smart City transportation initiatives. A schematic detailing the future traffic system communications architecture concept is provided in Appendix D. 4.1 Future Network StandardizaƟon Today’s “continuously connected” devices like smart phones, tablets and personal computers use Ethernet protocol to connect with each other and the internet. The world’s communication systems are based on the Ethernet protocol. There are no more separate data networks or voice networks as there were during 1980’s. Nowadays one common Ethernet network utilizing Internet Protocol (IP) efficiently handles both voice and data. Since Ethernet networks are ubiquitous the cost of communications equipment has continuously declined while the communications capabilities increase. The “Internet of Things” (IoT) applications will cause even further decline in Ethernet equipment price. Additionally, there are plenty of knowledgeable network engineers and technicians to support these new networks. The newer traffic, transportation, and ITS devices are either standardized on Ethernet interface or offer Ethernet interface as an option. Yet to be invented future devices will most likely support Ethernet interface. Ethernet provides a “future proof” network for the foreseeable future.  The City of Chula Vista future traffic signal communication system network will be based on Ethernet protocol.  The future network will combine multiple communications medium such as single mode fiber, existing copper plant, point-to-multipoint wireless, and cellular.  The future “CORE” network will use Layer 3 nodes connecting to each other via single mode fiber links. The future Ethernet/ IP protocol network shall be designed as a two-tiered network. Tier 1 will utilize the Layer 3 node equipment connected to each other in a ring network fashion using 10 Gbps or higher speed links. Tier 2 will utilize the Layer 2 Managed Field Ethernet Switches (MFES) such as VDSL switches, field Ethernet switches, and wireless broadband radios also connected to each other in a ring network fashion at various speed links, depending on the equipment on that link. ITS devices such as traffic controllers, 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 93 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 37 conflict monitors, CCTV cameras, Dynamic Message Signs (DMS), vehicle detectors, transit and emergency vehicle pre-emption devices, etc. will connect to the copper ports of Layer 2 MFES. The network architecture topology example is shown in Figure 4-1. The main feature of the future traffic signal communication system is its self-healing capability. The MFES’s, equipped with either dual fiber ports or dual VDSL ports, will connect to each other in a daisy chain fashion and to the Layer 3 nodes eliminating single point of failure and providing unattended, automatic self-healing capability. Figure 4-1 Future CORE Ring Network Topology Example At every traffic system location, the self-healing ring technology will be utilized as much as financially possible. When implemented, the City will have a state-of-the-art, future proof network that will be easily expandable to serve the city across diverse geography and services. The City of Chula Vista traffic signal communication system will simultaneously support multiple different ITS applications including: • Existing and future traffic controllers. • CCTV cameras. 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 94 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 38 • Conflict monitors. • Dynamic message signs. • Highway advisory radios. • Vehicle detection systems, (radar, video, etc.). • Emergency vehicle pre-emption systems. • Bluetooth and/or Wi-Fi based travel time systems. • Upcoming Vehicle to Infrastructure (V2I) systems and “Autonomous Vehicle” systems. In addition to the above ITS applications, the future traffic signal communication system will support • All future “Smart City” related applications. • All future Wi-Fi communications anywhere in the City including the “Chula Vista Smart Bayfront” project. The network will also support: • Public message billboards and public messaging systems. • Voice, video, streamed video services, and video conferencing among departments. • Any future Ethernet based communication devices and/ or services. At the City’s discretion, the network will be able to provide bandwidth and/ or ports sharing capability to different City departments. The same network could also provide bandwidth to private enterprises. 4.2 Future Network Architecture Examples Figure 4-2 shows one Layer 2 fiber switch based self-healing ring and four Layer 2 VDSL switch (copper) based self-healing rings. Each Layer 2 switch ring starts from a Layer 3 Ethernet router and terminates on a different Layer 3 Ethernet router. The Layer 3 ring starts at the TMC from the Layer 3 Ethernet router NODE TMC-1 and goes through NODE A, NODE B, NODE C and returns to the TMC and terminates on a different Layer 3 router NODE TMC-2. This topology eliminates any single point of failure, fiber cut or a node failure and the self-healing capability is the main principle of the future network design concept. Figure 4-3 shows one Layer 2 fiber switch based self-healing ring starting from a Layer 3 Ethernet router NODE A and terminating on a different Layer 3 Ethernet router NODE C. In this topology if a Layer 2 fiber switch fails, the fiber switches left of the failure point will communicate to NODE A and the fiber switches right of the failure point will communicate to NODE C. All the devices attached to Layer 2 switches will recover communications to the TMC automatically. Only the devices attached to the failed switch will lose communications to the TMC. If a fiber link fails, the devices attached to that switch will recover communications to the TMC via the other port. In addition, to illustrate the “dual homing” concept, a Layer 2 fiber switch is connected to both NODE A and NODE B and a second Layer 2 fiber switch is connected to both NODE B and NODE C. If one fiber link fails for a Layer 2 fiber switch, it will still communicate to the TMC via the other NODE. 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 95 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 39 Figure 4-2 Future Fiber and Copper Rings Network Topology Example 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 96 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 40 Figure 4-3 Future Fiber Switch Ring Topology Example Figure 4-4 shows one Layer 2 VDSL switch (copper) based self-healing ring start from a Layer 3 Ethernet router NODE A and terminate on a different Layer 3 Ethernet router NODE B. In this topology if a Layer 2 VDSL switch fails, the VDSL switches left of the failure point will communicate to NODE A and the VDSL switches right of the failure point will communicate to NODE B. All the devices attached to Layer 2 VDSL switches will automatically recover communications to the TMC. Only the devices attached to the failed VDSL switch will lose communications to the TMC. If a VDSL link fails, the devices attached to that switch will recover communications to the TMC via the other port. 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 97 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 41 Figure 4-4 Future VDSL Copper Switch Ring Network Topology Example Figure 4-5 shows one Layer 2 fiber switch based self-healing ring starting from the Layer 3 Ethernet router NODE A and terminating on the Layer 3 Ethernet router NODE C. Figure 4-5 also shows a second self- healing ring composed of Layer 2 VDSL switches, starting from the Layer 2 fiber switch, Switch #1 on the left and terminating on a different Layer 2 switch, Switch #2 on the right. Fiber Layer 2 switch, Switch #1 and VDSL switch, Switch #3 are collocated on the left and Fiber Layer 2 switch, Switch #2 and VDSL switch, Switch #4 are collocated on the right. Fiber and VDSL switches connect to each other via a short CAT 5 cable inside the traffic controller cabinet. In this topology if a Layer 2 switch (fiber or VDSL) fails, both the fiber switches based ring and the VDSL switches based ring will automatically recover communications to the TMC via either Switch #1 or Switch #2. Only the devices attached to the failed Layer 2 switch (fiber or VDSL) will lose communications to the TMC. If a link (fiber or copper) fails, the devices attached to that switch will recover communications to the TMC via the other port. 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 98 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 42 Figure 4-5 Future VDSL Copper Switch Ring to Fiber Switch Ring Topology Figure 4-6 shows isolated signals that are not on fiber routes on the city-owned copper wire routes, and signals that are on the city-owned copper wire routes but with no direct connection to a Layer 3 router. These isolated signals will use a 4G wireless router (also called a cellular modem) and communicate to the TMC over the 4G cellular service provider owned IoT service. Those signals that are on the city-owned copper wire routes but with no direct connection to a Layer 3 router will also communicate to the TMC using a 4G wireless router collocated with the “head-end” Layer 2 VDSL switch over the same 4G cellular service provider owned IoT service. In this topology, if a 4G router fails, only that single signal or the whole VDSL line is lost. If the IoT router, or the Firewall at the TMC or the link to the IoT service from the TMC fails, the communication to the 4G routers will be recovered via the second IoT link from NODE B. 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 99 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 43 Figure 4-6 Future IoT over Cellular Wireless Network Topology Example Figure 4-7 shows three different owned wireless network topology examples utilizing 802.11 ac (or the latest technology) wireless radios with integrated and external antennas. The same self-healing scenarios explained in prior cases also apply. If a remote radio or the wireless link from that remote radio location fails, only that location loses communications to the TMC. If a master radio fails, all the locations communicating with the master radio fails. Where geographically possible, mesh wireless links should be used. 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 100 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 44 Figure 4-7 Future Owned Wireless Network Topology Example 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 101 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 45 Figure 4-8 Future Redundant and Self-Healing Ring Architecture 4.2.1 TSCC CommunicaƟon Ports All the Digi boards at the TSCC will be removed, discarded and replaced with “Virtual Com Port” software provided by Digi. The Virtual Com Port software allows the existing traffic controller software that was communicating with the existing 170E controllers over its Serial port to communicate over the new Ethernet network without any hardware or firmware changes to the 170E controller in the field. Only a new Digi N2S-170 Card will be installed in the modem slot of the 170E controller. 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 102 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 46 4.2.2 Bandwidth Requirements The vast bandwidth of a modern Ethernet network dramatically increases accessibility to all ITS devices and applications within the traffic signal network, including streaming video from CCTV cameras and emerging technologies such as Connected Vehicles and Smart City applications. While the initial upgrade to Ethernet will effectively over-provision the capacity requirements of existing technology, the use of managed network switches allows for resource reservation control mechanisms ensuring Quality of Service (QoS) can be delivered to critical applications and/or devices. 4.2.2.1 Traffic Signal Cabinet Assemblies and Components The assemblies and components of a traffic signal cabinet were originally developed under the restrictions of legacy communication networks where bandwidth was a scarce resource. These utilize a minimal portion of the overall bandwidth available in an Ethernet network. A single IP surveillance camera consumes several orders of magnitude more bandwidth than bandwidth consumed by all the traffic controllers within the same network. However, cumulative impact of thousands of devices can overload the network. The traffic control devices consuming minimal bandwidth include: • Traffic Controller Unit • Conflict Monitor Unit • Preemption Phase Selector • Battery Backup Unit 4.2.2.2 IP Surveillance Cameras Real time video streaming over IP is the chief consumer of network bandwidth in a traffic signal communication network. Live video is paramount to the effective management of signal operations at individual intersections and along arterial routes. Video detection cameras and Pan-Tilt-Zoom (PTZ) cameras are commonly used to monitor the flow of the traffic. The bandwidth utilized by cameras ranges from 0.5 to 5 bps per camera1. The following parameters affect the actual bandwidth consumed by an IP video camera system and one must consider the following factors: • Video encoding algorithm, like H.265 (AVC), H.264, MPEG-4, MPEG-2, Motion JPEG. • Resolution. • Frames per second. • Number of Cameras. 4.2.2.3 Dynamic Message Signs Dynamic Message Signs (DMS) provide travelers with real-time or advanced notice information for traffic conditions, roadway incidents, construction, community events, and other alerts. LED signs are most common and are energy-efficient, bright, and highly legible. Character size and number of lines differ among manufacturers and signs are capable of multi-colored and graphical displays, providing the City 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 103 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 47 with advertisement placement opportunities. Signs can be managed remotely utilizing the traffic systems communications network. DMS include portable and fixed sign deployments or installations. Portable DMS are mounted to a trailer with hydraulic lift mechanisms and positioned on the side of a roadway prior to diversion points or connecting roadways. Portable DMS are self-powered utilizing solar panels or batteries and the messages are typically changed remotely from the TMC utilizing wireless or cellular communications. The City currently owns two portable DMS signs that are used exclusively by the Chula Vista Police Department. Two additional portable DMS signs are recommended for City Traffic Operations staff use. Fixed DMS are larger overhead signs that are mounted to a fixed pole and positioned at central areas of interest to provide the greatest benefit for shared travel information. Fixed DMS utilize a local power source and can communicate with the TMC through the cable based traffic systems communications network. It is recommended that the City install fixed DMS signs in advance of freeway ramps and at the Chula Vista Amphitheater. Both portable and fixed DMS should be used to share traffic information related, but not limited to: recurring congestion, traffic incidents, special events, construction, maintenance activities, road closures, detour routes, etc. To ensure security, rights for device use, including both view and control, should be assigned to prevent unauthorized access. 4.2.2.4 Demand for Real-Time Data Future transportation management systems will exchange traffic data with a multitude of independent and/or integrated mobility applications that will allow travelers and system operators to make informed decisions. Smartphone applications like, Waze, HERE WeGo, Inrix Traffic, etc. are now connecting to traffic management systems to exchange data. The data exchange is typically provided through a separate internet connection at the TMC. 4.2.3 IP Addressing Scheme Since the future traffic signal communications network devices are going to be IP based, each device in the network must have at least one IP address. IP addresses are in the form of First Octet. Second Octet. Third Octet. Fourth Octet. An example IP address is 192.168.1.123. The future IP scheme for the City of Chula Vista Master Plan is as follows. • First Octet = ABC. • Second Octet = XYZ. • Third octet = Device ID organized by associated hub and location east or west of I-805. • Fourth Octet = Intersection ID organized by corridor and direction, east to west or north to south. The IP addressing scheme is provided to the City in a separate document due the sensitivity of the information. 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 104 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 48 4.3 Smart City Chula Vista The City is implementing a vision of a 21st century Smart City that includes building a robust, technically advanced transportation network that connects the City both geographically and on the information superhighway. The Master Plan is compatible with Chula Vista’s Smart City initiatives and advances several Smart Infrastructure applications including: video, lighting, parking, transportation, public transportation and shuttles, zero emissions vehicles, environmental sensors, and public safety. The ITS improvements will reduce congestion throughout the City, advance the City’s Climate Action Plan goals, and promote sustainability. 4.3.1 Automated Vehicle Proving Grounds In January 2017, the U.S. Department of Transportation (US DOT) designated 10 Automated Vehicle (AV) proving ground pilot sites to encourage testing and information sharing for AV technologies across a variety of climates, entity types, speed zones, and concentration. SANDAG, Caltrans, and City of Chula Vista were jointly selected in response to the US DOT pilot program application solicitation2. The San Diego region has three proving ground environments: the I-15 Express Lanes from SR-163 to SR-78, the SR-125 South Bay Express Way from East Chula Vista to the United States-Mexico border, and the City of Chula Vista. The local network of streets and roadways in Chula Vista will be used as a testbed for AV technology3. 4.3.2 I-805 AcƟve Tra ffic and Demand Management The City of Chula Vista is a stakeholder in the Active Traffic and Demand Management (ATDM) program which will be deployed on the I-805 South corridor from SR-94 to the United States-Mexico border. This heavily-utilized commuter corridor provides access to and from National City, Chula Vista, San Diego, and beyond. The AT DM project seeks to utilize technology and interagency communications to optimize and maintain trip reliability, increase throughput, minimize delay, promote institutional coordination, and increase technical integration across all modes and jurisdictions. Travel information will be collected, processed, and shared with roadway users to enhance planning for timely arrival at destinations. Twenty-five different ATDMS strategies have been identified in the ATDM Concept of Operations with deployment categorized by timeframe: Short Term (1-3 Years), Medium Term (4-7 Years), and Long Term (8-10 Years). The strategies outlined will be enhanced by the additional operational functions the City currently has and/or is 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 105 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 49 improving including: travel time monitoring on Telegraph Canyon Road and implementation of the new Adaptive Traffic Signal Control system. 4.3.3 Connected Vehicle Technology Connected vehicle applications have many benefits including increased roadway safety with the potential to greatly reduce or eliminate collisions, improve mobility and roadway capacity, environmental sustainability, and infrastructure management. Connections between vehicles and infrastructure (V2I) is a critical element of the connected vehicle environment and requires infrastructure preparation on the part of public agencies that own and operate transportation systems. V2I deployments have emerged over the past several years with the most prevalent issued by AASHTO; the National Connected Vehicle Signal Phase and Timing (SPaT) challenge. The goal of the SPaT challenge is to deploy roadside Dedicated Short Range Communications (DSRC) radio infrastructure to broadcast SPaT data on at least 1 corridor or street network in all 50 states by January 20204. Connected vehicle technology requires reliable, secure, fast communication with low latency that is not vulnerable to environmental conditions or multipath transmissions, and has wide interoperability. DSRC is the most standardized and tested connected vehicle communication technology. The FHWA is currently proposing a mandate for DSRC to be built into all new vehicles by 20225. Other wireless communications technology alternatives to DSRC have emerged including cellular and cellular hybrid. The most likely near term (say 5 year) deployment of V2I in the City would be associated with a pilot demonstration deployment. If connected vehicle technology is mandated by the FHWA to be built into new vehicles there would be a significant interest on the part of transportation agencies to widely deploy connected vehicle communications technology in infrastructure. The infrastructure side of the V2I communication link requires a roadside unit (RSU), compatible traffic signal hardware, and communication systems. The most limiting factor with connected vehicle technology deployment is cost, both cost to vehicle manufacturers and transportation infrastructure owners and operators. Opportunities in the form of federal aid funds will likely become available in the future to deploy these communications systems. 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 106 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 50 The recommendations made in this Master Plan will support the service requirements of future V2I network traffic. The communication system architecture concept includes an over provision of bandwidth, is distributed throughout City, and utilizes NTCIP-complaint hardware and Ethernet communications protocols for a V2I ready infrastructure platform. 4.3.3.1 Predictive Traffic Signals Advancements in V2I communications include traffic signal and in-vehicle systems that can utilize SPaT information to communicate information to the driver. Several in-vehicle information systems and smart phone applications for predictive traffic signal technology have already been developed and deployed. Generally, information from traffic signal controllers and/ or the central traffic management system is collected and communicated to a third-party data aggregation provider. SPaT data is processed through algorithms and predicted traffic signal red or green state and red times are pushed through an internet connection, typically cellular communications, to display in-vehicle or on the driver’s smartphone. This type of information can enhance the way a motorist makes decisions when approaching signals based on the signal state, travel speed, and time. These features ultimately reduce idling, stop-and-go traffic, pollution, and red-light violation collisions. Third-party data aggregation providers, such as Traffic Technology Systems (TTS) and Connected Signals, Inc. have deployed predictive traffic signal technology in cooperation with automotive manufacturers. TTS is teamed with Audi to deploy an in-dash subscription service which provides a countdown for red lights, 4 second alert before a red-light change, and a heads-up display when a vehicle approaches a signal that is about to change phases. The agency’s central traffic management system connects to the TTS system “cloud” to transmit SPaT data. The TTS receives the SPaT data and then sends the predictive information to the OEM backend system which sends it to the vehicle. This system has been successfully demonstrated in Las Vegas, NV and active deployments are planned throughout the US6. The City of Chula Vista is currently considering a partnership agreement with TTS. Connected Signals developed the EnLighten application to provide predictive traffic signal information for BMW vehicles through an in-dash subscription service as well as to drivers that do not own compatible vehicles through their smartphone application. Countdown information is displayed when stopped at a red light and a chime alert sounds seconds prior to the light turning green. Connected Signals utilizes a device on the agency premises to connect to the internet and central traffic management system for receiving SPAT data. The Connected Signals cloud receives the SPaT data and then sends the predictive information to the user’s smart phone or in-vehicle system. EnLighten is currently available in Portland 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 107 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 51 and Eugene, Oregon with testing in progress in the City of San Jose in cooperation with BMW and the U.S. Department of Energy’s Argonne National Laboratory7. 4.3.4 Intelligent Street LighƟng Networked street lighting control systems reduce costs associated with operating and maintaining street lights. The City of Chula Vista was the first in the region to implement LED lighting technology Citywide and is currently working with multiple vendors to install and test street lights, as part of a pilot, with communication and sensor technologies that create a smart grid street light system. The system can also be leveraged to capture high-density time-stamped real-time and historical event data, using the Internet of Things (IoT) cloud storage, for a variety of Smart City applications including vehicle traffic, pedestrian traffic, and parking. Travel data includes vehicle speed, direction, lane use, volumes, pedestrian activity, and parking utilization. This information will enable the City of Chula Vista to more accurately: • Identify recurring traffic, flow issues, high-incident areas, traffic violation patterns. • Perform more extensive ‘before and after’ analyses to illustrate changes in driver behavior. • Identify sidewalk and crosswalk utilization to enhance pedestrian safety. • Develop strategic demand-based parking pricing based on parking usage and vacancy periods. • Provide better parking enforcement for overstay, no-parking zone, and loading zone violations. The City of San Diego has recently partnered with Current, powered by GE, to deploy 3,200 sensor nodes on City street lights to create a multi-application City IoT network. The nodes can perform a variety of applications including vehicle, pedestrian, and bicycle monitoring, parking availability, air quality sensing, and gunshot detection. The data from the sensor nodes will be processed and stored on a cloud-based server. The deployment of the nodes is slated to begin August 2017 and be completed in July 20188. 4.3.5 Advanced Transporta Ɵon Controllers (ATC) Chula Vista currently uses “Type 170” traffic signal controllers that are built on an old technology platform with limited processing, memory, program, and communications functionality. These legacy controllers are incapable of collecting High-Resolution (Hi-Res) controller data required for advanced traffic measurement and monitoring. The 2070 ATC controller platform will enable collection and reporting of High-Resolution (Hi-Res) controller data. Industry advancements in Hi-Res data processing provide multiple ITS-related applications pertaining to autonomous vehicles, connected vehicles, connected infrastructure, and Smart City technologies. The Intelligent Transportation Systems Joint Program Office (ITS JPO) has provided research data across all modes for these technologies and has outlined how the data collected is being used by public and private organizations9. 4.3.6 Future Technology ApplicaƟons Table 4-1 provides a summary of the various data types and ITS usage applications that the City of Chula Vista may seek to implement in the future to advance the Smart City Chula Vista vision and increase overall travel safety and efficiency throughout the City. 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 108 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 52 Table 4-1 ITS Data Applications Summary ITS DATA TYPE DATA UTILIZED AGENCY USES SPaT Signal status, signal timing, timing plans, detection Red light running detection, signal retiming studies, arterial performance measures Trajectory Vehicle Location, Speed, Heading Model development and refinement, new development impact studies, ride sharing applications, vehicle type and route comparisons Parking Space Availability Parking lot location, number of spaces, available spaces, size of spaces by vehicle type Planning and system use analysis, parking applications, traveler information Safety Messages Vehicle size, current location, speed, heading, acceleration status, brake system status V2V and V2I deployment testing and evaluation Infrastructure Alerts Infrastructure-to-Vehicle In-vehicle messaging for variable speed limit signs, dynamic message signs, work zone alerts, tolling rates, and red light running License Plate Recognition License plate data Arterial performance measures, travel time analysis, signal retiming studies Automated Shuttle Synchronized scheduling Self-driving testing, Transit Signal Priority testing, obstacle bypass testing 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 109 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 53 5 Implementation Phasing Plan The existing traffic systems communications network is comprised of numerous network devices and communications media including fiber optic cable, twisted pair copper wire cable, Serial wireless radios, and third-party owned leased copper lines, telephone drops, and cellular service. The analog network is antiquated and incapable of supporting the City’s future ITS technology investments due to limited communications capacity. Implementing one seamless state-of-the-art communications network capable of meeting the City’s existing and future traffic system needs requires a strategically phased approach. The highest priorities include establishing a City-owned traffic signal communication system and implementing Ethernet-compatible systems/network. The existing analog lease lines generate high recurring costs and are incapable of serving modern traffic system technology. Existing investments in communication infrastructure, underground systems, signal interconnect cable, and traffic signal cabinets will continue to be utilized. Obsolete legacy network equipment will be upgraded or decommissioned and replaced with new modern communication technologies. Converting existing technologies to Ethernet- based communications through upgrades is the most cost-effective and rapid deployment approach, enabling improvements across wider areas. Implementation of Master Plan recommendations is divided into three phases over a ten-year period. Deployment for each phase is dependent on availability of funds and accelerated deployment is advantageous for financial, operational, and management purposes. The City should seek grant funding and other opportunities to more quickly complete all implementation phases within 5 years. 5.1 Phase 1: City-Owned Infrastructure (Year 1-3) Phase 1 of the implementation plan includes providing a wholly City-owned traffic signal communication network, converting from Serial to an all Ethernet-based network, upgrading traffic signal controllers to Ethernet protocol, and establishing video monitoring at the City’s highest priority locations. Implementation for Phase 1 is prioritized by proximity to City Hall as well as by street network hierarchy. The downtown area, closest to City Hall, contains the greatest number of signalized intersections operating on costly third-party owned leased communications. The traffic signals in this area are spaced close together and are ideal for implementation of broadband Ethernet wireless radios, which provide cost- effective and rapid communications deployment. Traffic signal equipment will be upgraded to Ethernet- enabled devices and Layer 3 communication hubs will be installed at strategic locations. The following summarizes the Phase 1 traffic signal communications network upgrades: • Upgrade the existing fiber optic system to Ethernet communications. • Convert leased copper lines to City-owned wireless Ethernet radio communications. • Upgrade City-owned copper lines to Ethernet-over-copper communications. • Install City-owned wireless Ethernet radio communications at all offline traffic signals. 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 110 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 54 • Convert the leased cellular network for existing Traffic Measurement Devices to City-owned wireless Ethernet radio communications. • Install video monitoring devices at high priority locations. • Install fixed Dynamic Message Signs approaching the Chula Vista Amphitheater. • Obtain 2 portable Dynamic Message Signs for use during planned or unforeseen major traffic impacting events. • Install a satellite Traffic Management Center at the City’s Traffic Operations Maintenance Facility. • Upgrade all traffic signal equipment to Ethernet-enabled devices Citywide. • Implement Layer 3 communication hubs at strategic locations. A summary of the Phase 1 improvements is illustrated in Figure 5-1. 5.2 Phase 2: Infrastructure and Priority Corridors Upgrade (Year 4-6) Phase 2 of the Implementation Plan prioritizes fiber optic communications. Existing communications conduit that has been previously installed throughout Chula Vista will be upgraded to include new fiber optic cable installations. New conduit and fiber optic cable will be installed to resolve all remaining communications gaps and create redundancy. Strategic signalized intersections along priority corridors throughout the City will be upgraded to include type 2070 ATC traffic signal controllers and closed circuit televisions (CCTV) cameras for remote video monitoring. The following summarizes the Phase 2 traffic signal communications network upgrades: • Upgrade existing empty communications conduit and install fiber optic cable. • Install conduit and fiber optic cable to resolve communications gaps in the network and create redundant ring topology. • Upgrade traffic signal equipment on primary fiber optic ring route with fiber devices. • Upgrade traffic signal equipment on priority corridors with new 2070 ATC controllers and CCTV cameras. A summary of the Phase 2 improvements is illustrated in Figure 5-2. 5.3 Phase 3: Citywide Buildout (Year 7-10) Buildout of the traffic signal communications network will be completed in Phase 3. Remaining signalized intersections will be upgraded with type 2070 ATC traffic signal controllers and closed-circuit television (CCTV) cameras for remote video monitoring. Signalized intersections with existing analog video detection will be upgraded with analog to Ethernet video encoders to enable remote viewing of the video feeds. A summary of the Phase 3 improvements is illustrated in Figure 5-3. 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 111 (###) (###) (###) (###) ### ### ### ### ### XY XY XY XY XY XYXY XYXY XY XY XY XY XY XY XY XY XYXY XY XY XY XY XY XYXY XY XY XY XYXYXY XY XYXYXY XY XY XY XY XYXY XYXYXY XY --¡ÇÖ*ÇÖ*ñ kj ñ !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(3 333 3 3 3 3 33 3333 333 33 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 33 3 3 3 333 333333 3 33 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 33 3 3 33 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 333 3 33 3 33 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 33 3 3 3 333 3 3 3 3 3 3 33 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 33 3 3 33 3 3 3 33 33 3 33 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 33 33 33 3 3 3 3 3 3 31 31 31 31 31 3131 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 3131 31 31 31 31 31 3131 31 3131 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 3131 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 3131 31 31 31 31 31 3131 3131 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 3131 31 31 31 31 31 3131 31 31 31 31 31 31 %, %, %, %, %, %, %, %, %, %,%, %, %, %, %, %, %, %, %, %, %, %, %, %,%,³¸³¸³¸³¸³¸³¸³¸³¸³¸³¸³¸³¸³¸³¸³¸³¸³¸³¸³¸³¸³¸³¸³¸³¸³¸³¸³¸³¸!"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$508 !"#$508 !"#$508 ·|}þ54·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 E H ST E J ST MAIN ST 04TH AVI ST OLYMPIC PYH ST03RD AV J ST E ST L ST F ST BAY BLOTAYLAKESRD HUNTE PYBROADWAYK ST E PALOMAR S THILLTOP DR D ST 01ST AV MOSS ST LAMEDI ARD PALOMAR ST05TH AV NAPLES ST TE L E GRAPH CA NYONRD ANITA ST 02ND AV E L ST E NAPLES S T ORANGE AV G ST C ST HERI T A G E R DLANEAVPROCTOR VALLEY RD PA S EOLADERA B O N IT A RDCLUB H O U S E D R E I ST EORA N G E A VE OXFORD S T FLOWER S T S RANCHO D E L R E Y PY N R A NCHODELREYPY PASEO D E LREYWUE STERDN 0 2 N D A VN G REEN S V IEWD R E X P L O RATIONFALLSDRCREST DRE F L O W E R S T E PALOMAR D R E H ST W U E S T E R D 05TH AV K ST02ND AVHERITAGE RDI ST 01ST AVBAY BL G ST ANITA STANITA ST 03RD AVC ST WUESTE RDMAIN KJ HERITAGEMONTACETRIBUTARYMAIN W BS T R E E T " A "SR 125 S A N T A M A R I S O L ARI OTAY VALLEY U N I V E R S I T Y STREET "E"STREET "I"STREET "D"S A N T A D A V I S S A N T A T I PO DI S C O V E R Y F A L L S SA N T A M A C H E T O CAR AWA Y STREET "F"CALLE SWANS E A SOLS T ICE STREET "D"SR 125MAINSR 1 2 5 OTAY VALLEY MAIN SAN DIEGO S.D. COUNTY CORONADO NATIONAL CITY SAN DIEGO IMPERIAL BEACH S.D. COUNTY LANDFILL S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY 255115 117 114 116 118 173 135 150 128 (112)83(112)80 (113)68 (106)28 (114)73 (113)89 (103)41 (117)94 (117)90 (117)91 (109)31 (114)72 (113)71 (109)55 (108)54 (108)53 (105)24 (113)70 (109)58 (109)56 (106)32 (105)26 (105)25 (106)27 (123)22 (103)23 (113)69(108)52 (109)51(105)40 (108)79 (103)17 (108)49 (108)50(105)39 (104)38(123)20 (110)81 (108)84(108)82 (111)63 (111)85 (102)11 (102)12 (110)77(102)13 (110)78 (108)44(104)33 (123)15 (104)37 (108)48 (108)47(104)36 (123)16 (123)21 (111)86 (112)67 (112)66 (112)65 (123)19 (123)18 (108)46(104)35 (108)64 (104)34 (107)45 (107)43 (118)98 (108)93 (116)99 (125)125 (121)143 (117)286 (114)219 (103)281 (103)280 (117)278 (113)260 (120)217 (120)213 (106)136 (120)121 (117)104 (125)126 (117)105 (117)103 (116)154 (103)146 (125)127 (117)168 (116)110 (125)124 (105)192 (107)149 (115)108 (121)107 (125)142 (117)287 (124)221 (116)102 (120)112 (122)284 (121)263 (121)266 (121)267 (122)244 (124)271(124)270 (128)268 (128)269 (122)257(122)256(122)262(122)261 (122)251 (121)248 (121)247 (122)245 (122)243 (122)233 (122)222 (124)253 (124)220 (121)250 (125)228 (103)254 (127)246 (121)224 (121)225 (121)242 (121)241 (121)240 (121)239 (122)236(122)235 (128)234 (127)229 (121)226 (124)223 (118)218 (120)216 (128)214 (127)139 (118)165 (118)170 (118)174 (118)163 (118)162 (118)141 (118)169 (118)172 (118)183(118)182 (124)179 (124)178 (124)152 (118)171 (118)161 (118)153 (118)147 (118)144 (126)132 (126)131 (126)129 (116)100 (116)101 (126)140 (126)133 (127)167 (128)177 (124)164 (124)145 (128)181 (124)148 (127)138 (127)137 (124)158 (124)157(124)123(120)120 (115)159 (118)199 (116)197 (124)195 (128)202 (128)203 (128)201 (118)189 (124)211 (101)206(118)190 (128)200 (128)185 (128)204 (128)196 (116)193 (128)194 (128)186 (128)205 (124)191 (124)187 (124)208 (124)188 (124)184 EASTLAKE PY EAS T L A K E P Y BIRCH RD INDUSTR IAL BL PROCTOR VALLEY RD BRANDYWINE AVBONITA R D MT M I G U E L R D FLOWER ST PASEO RANCHEROMEDICAL CENTER DRSAN MIGUEL RANCH RD N 04TH AVTIERRA DEL REYARTISAN ST 03RD AVE 07TH STE NAPLES CT MAIN ST HERITAGE RD MAIN ST 113 119 (115)92 (106)29 (109)57(103)30 (114)75 (114)74 (114)76 (114)59 (113)88 (115)87 (110)61 (110)60 (102)14 (115)95 (110)62 (107)42 (118)96 (118)97 (122)265 (122)283 (122)285(122)288 (109)279 (116)109 (121)106 (102)151 (122)282 (128)273 (121)264 (122)237 (122)238 (122)259 (122)252 (128)258 (121)227 (128)215 (127)230 (118)156 (118)166 (124)176 (124)175 (126)130 (120)122 (126)111 (124)155 (124)134 (124)160 (122)207 (128)209 (121)198 Figure 5-1 Phase 1 Improvements Legend ###System Control Number (###)Communication Number ³¸Priority Video Monitoring Locations %,Existing Traffic Signal Ethernet Conversion 31 Single Wireless Ethernet Radio 31 Dual Wireless Ethernet Radio 3 Ethernet Switch !(Existing Traffic Signal !(Offline Existing Traffic Signal !(Future Traffic Signal XY Traffic Measurement Device Future Fiber Existing Copper Existing Fiber Future Roads ñ City Hall TMC ñ Satellite Maintenance Facility TMC kj Chula Vista Amphitheater --¡Fixed Changeable Message Sign ÇÖ*Portable Changeable Message Sign City of Chula Vista 0 0.5 10.25 Miles Document Path: S:\Projects\Chula Vista\0347_Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan\04 Design\GIS\MXD Files\Chula Vista Comm MP Phase Implementation.mxd/ 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 112 (###) (###) (###) (###) ### ### ### ### ###""""""""""""""""""""""!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! # #### # ######## # ## ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^## # ## # ##### # # # ######### ## ®®® ®®®®®®® ®®®®® ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^## # # # ## # # ##^^^^^^^^^^^XXXYY Y Y Y Y YYYY """"""""""===## = = = == ñ !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !ª !ª !ª !ª !ª !ª !ª !ª !ª !ª !ª !ª !ª !ª !ª !ª !ª !ª !ª !ª !ª !ª !ª !ª !ª !ª !ª !ª !(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$508 !"#$508 !"#$508 ·|}þ54·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 E H ST E J ST MAIN ST 04TH AVI ST OLYMPIC PYH ST03RD AV J ST E ST L ST F ST BAY BLOTAYLAKESRD HUNTE PYBROADWAYK ST E PALOMAR S THILLTOP DR D ST 01ST AV MOSS ST LAMEDI ARD PALOMAR ST05TH AV NAPLES ST TE L E GRAPH CA NYONRD ANITA ST 02ND AV E L ST E NAPLES S T ORANGE AV G ST C ST HERI T A G E R DLANEAVP R O C TORVALLEYRD PA S EOLADERA B O N IT A RDCLUB H O U S E D R E I ST EORA N G E A VE OXFORD S T FLOWER S T S RANCHO D E L R E Y PY N R A NCHODELREYPY PASEO D E LREYWUE STERDN 0 2 N D A VN G REEN S V IEWD R E X P L O RATIONFALLSDRCREST DRE F L O W E R S T E PALOMAR D R 01ST AV E H ST W U E S T E R D02ND AV K ST G ST 05TH AVI ST PROCTOR VALLEY RD BAY BL C ST ANITA STANITA ST HERITAGE RDWUESTE RDSAN DIEGO S.D. COUNTY CORONADO NATIONAL CITY SAN DIEGO IMPERIAL BEACH S.D. COUNTY LANDFILL S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY 255115 117 113 114 116 118 173 135 150 128 (112)83(112)80 (113)68 (106)28 (114)73 (113)89 (103)41 (117)94 (117)90 (117)91 (109)31 (114)72 (113)71 (109)55 (108)54 (108)53 (105)24 (113)70 (109)58 (109)56 (106)32 (105)26 (105)25 (106)27 (123)22 (103)23 (113)69(108)52 (109)51(105)40 (108)79 (103)17 (108)49 (108)50(105)39 (104)38(123)20 (110)81 (108)84(108)82 (111)63 (111)85 (102)11 (102)12 (110)77(102)13 (110)78 (108)44(104)33 (123)15 (104)37 (108)48 (108)47(104)36 (123)16 (123)21 (111)86 (112)67 (112)66 (112)65 (123)19 (123)18 (108)46(104)35 (108)64 (104)34 (107)45 (107)43 (118)98 (108)93 (116)99 (125)125 (121)143 (117)286 (114)219 (103)281 (103)280 (117)278 (113)260 (120)217 (120)213 (106)136 (120)121 (117)104 (125)126 (117)105 (117)103 (116)154 (103)146 (125)127 (117)168 (116)110 (125)124 (105)192 (107)149 (115)108 (121)107 (125)142 (117)287 (124)221 (116)102 (120)112 (122)284 (121)263 (121)266 (121)267 (122)244 (124)271(124)270 (128)268 (128)269 (122)259 (122)257(122)256(122)262(122)261 (122)251 (121)248 (121)247 (122)245 (122)243 (122)233 (122)222 (124)253 (124)220 (121)250 (125)228 (103)254 (127)246 (121)224 (121)225 (121)241 (121)240 (121)239 (122)236(122)235 (128)234 (127)229 (121)226 (124)223 (118)218 (120)216 (128)214 (127)139 (118)165 (118)170 (118)174 (118)163 (118)162 (118)141 (118)169 (118)172 (118)183(118)182 (124)179 (124)178 (124)152 (118)171 (118)161 (118)153 (118)147 (118)144 (126)132 (126)131 (126)129 (116)100 (116)101 (126)140 (126)133 (127)167 (128)177 (124)164 (124)145 (128)181 (124)148 (127)138 (127)137 (124)158 (124)157(124)123(120)120 (115)159 (118)199 (116)197 (124)195 (128)202 (128)203 (128)201 (118)189 (124)211 (101)206(118)190 (128)200 (128)185 (128)204 (128)196 (116)193 (128)194 (128)186 (128)205 (124)191 (124)187 (124)208 (124)188 (124)184 EASTLAKE PY EAS T L A K E P Y BIRCH RD INDUSTR IAL BLBRANDYWINE AVBONITA R D MT M I G U E L R D FLOWER ST PASEO RANCHEROMEDICAL CENTER DRSAN MIGUEL RANCH RD N 04TH AVTIERRA DEL REYARTISAN ST 03RD AVE 07TH STE NAPLES CT HERITAGE RD MAIN STMAIN ST 03RD AV 119 (115)92 (106)29 (109)57(103)30 (114)75 (114)74 (114)76 (114)59 (113)88 (115)87 (110)61 (110)60 (102)14 (115)95 (110)62 (107)42 (118)96 (118)97 (122)265 (122)283 (122)285(122)288 (109)279 (116)109 (121)106 (102)151 (122)282 (128)273 (121)264 (122)237 (122)238 (122)252 (128)258 (121)227 (128)215 (121)242 (127)230 (118)156 (118)166 (124)176 (124)175 (126)130 (120)122 (126)111 (124)155 (124)134 (124)160 (122)207 (128)209 (121)198 Figure 5-2 Phase 2 Improvements Legend ###System Control Number (###)Communication Number !(Existing Traffic Signal !(Offline Existing Traffic Signal !ªTraffic Signal Controller Upgrade !(³¸Traffic Signal Controller Upgrade and CCTV New Fiber in Existing COMM Conduit New Fiber in New Conduit New Fiber in Existing Copper Conduit City of Chula Vista ñ City Hall Priority Corridor Road Way Classification 4 Lane Major 6 Lane Major # #6 Lane Prime ^^^Class 1 Collector """"Commercial Boulevard (4 Lane) ® ® ®Downtown Promenade (2/4 Lane) ===Expressway (7 or 8 Lane) YYYY Gateway Street (4 Lane) XXXXX Gateway Street (6 Lane) Other Roads ! ! ! !Urban Arterial (4 Lane)0 0.5 10.25 Miles Document Path: S:\Projects\Chula Vista\0347_Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan\04 Design\GIS\MXD Files\Chula Vista Comm MP Phase Implementation.mxd/ 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 113 (###) (###) (###) (###) ### ### ### ### ### ñ !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$508 !"#$508 !"#$508 ·|}þ54·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 E H ST E J ST MAIN ST 04TH AVI ST OLYMPIC PYH ST03RD AV J ST E ST L ST F ST BAY BLOTAYLAKESRD HUNTE PYBROADWAYK ST E PALOMAR S THILLTOP DR D ST 01ST AV MOSS ST LAMEDI ARD PALOMAR ST05TH AV NAPLES ST TE L E GRAPH CA NYONRD ANITA ST 02ND AV E L ST E NAPLES S T ORANGE AV G ST C ST HERI T A G E R DLANEAVP R O C TORVALLEYRD PA S EOLADERA B O N IT A RDCLUB H O U S E D R E I ST EORA N G E A VE OXFORD S T FLOWER S T S RANCHO D E L R E Y PY N R A NCHODELREYPY PASEOD E LREYWUE STERDN 0 2 N D A VN GREEN S V IEWD R E X P L O RATIONFALLSDRCREST DRE F L O W E R S T E PALOMAR D R 01ST AV E H ST W U E S T E R D02ND AV K ST G ST 05TH AVI ST PROCTOR VALLEY RD BAY BL C ST ANITA STANITA ST HERITAGE RDWUESTE RDSAN DIEGO S.D. COUNTY CORONADO NATIONAL CITY SAN DIEGO IMPERIAL BEACH S.D. COUNTY LANDFILL S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY 255 115 117 113 114 116 118 173 135 150 128 (112)83(112)80 (113)68 (106)28 (114)73 (113)89 (103)41 (117)94 (117)90 (117)91 (109)31 (114)72 (113)71 (109)55 (108)54 (108)53 (105)24 (113)70 (109)58 (109)56 (106)32 (105)26 (105)25 (106)27 (123)22 (103)23 (113)69(108)52 (109)51(105)40 (108)79 (103)17 (108)49 (108)50(105)39 (104)38(123)20 (110)81 (108)84(108)82 (111)63 (111)85 (102)11 (102)12 (110)77(102)13 (110)78 (108)44(104)33 (123)15 (104)37 (108)48 (108)47(104)36 (123)16 (123)21 (111)86 (112)67 (112)66 (112)65 (123)19 (123)18 (108)46(104)35 (108)64 (104)34 (107)45 (107)43 (118)98 (108)93 (116)99 (125)125 (121)143 (117)286 (114)219 (103)281 (103)280 (117)278 (113)260 (120)217 (120)213 (106)136 (120)121 (117)104 (125)126 (117)105 (117)103 (116)154 (103)146 (125)127 (117)168 (116)110 (125)124 (105)192 (107)149 (115)108 (121)107 (125)142 (117)287 (124)221 (116)102 (120)112 (122)284 (121)263 (121)266 (121)267 (122)244 (124)271(124)270 (128)268 (128)269 (122)259 (122)257(122)256(122)262(122)261 (122)251 (121)248 (121)247 (122)245 (122)243 (122)233 (122)222 (124)253 (124)220 (121)250 (125)228 (103)254 (127)246 (121)224 (121)225 (121)241 (121)240 (121)239 (122)236(122)235 (128)234 (127)229 (121)226 (124)223 (118)218 (120)216 (128)214 (127)139 (118)165 (118)170 (118)174 (118)163 (118)162 (118)141 (118)169 (118)172 (118)183(118)182 (124)179 (124)178 (124)152 (118)171 (118)161 (118)153 (118)147 (118)144 (126)132 (126)131 (126)129 (116)100 (116)101 (126)140 (126)133 (127)167 (128)177 (124)164 (124)145 (128)181 (124)148 (127)138 (127)137 (124)158 (124)157(124)123(120)120 (115)159 (118)199 (116)197 (124)195 (128)202 (128)203 (128)201 (118)189 (124)211 (101)206(118)190 (128)200 (128)185 (128)204 (128)196 (116)193 (128)194 (128)186 (128)205 (124)191 (124)187 (124)208 (124)188 (124)184 EASTLAKE PY EAS T L A K E P Y BIRCH RD INDUSTR IAL BLBRANDYWINE AVBONITA R D MT M I G U E L R D FLOWER ST PASEO RANCHEROMEDICAL CENTER DRSAN MIGUEL RANCH RD N 04TH AVTIERRA DEL REYARTISAN ST 03RD AVE 07TH STE NAPLES CT HERITAGE RD MAIN STMAIN ST 03RD AV 119 (115)92 (106)29 (109)57(103)30 (114)75 (114)74 (114)76 (114)59 (113)88 (115)87 (110)61 (110)60 (102)14 (115)95 (110)62 (107)42 (118)96 (118)97 (122)265 (122)283 (122)285(122)288 (109)279 (116)109 (121)106 (102)151 (122)282 (128)273 (121)264 (122)237 (122)238 (122)252 (128)258 (121)227 (128)215 (121)242 (127)230 (118)156 (118)166 (124)176 (124)175 (126)130 (120)122 (126)111 (124)155 (124)134 (124)160 (122)207 (128)209 (121)198 Figure 5-3 Phase 3 Improvements Legend ###System Control Number (###)Communication Number !(Existing Traffic Signal !(Offline Existing Traffic Signal !(³¸Traffic Signal Upgrade and CCTV City of Chula Vista ñ City Hall 0 0.5 10.25 Miles Document Path: S:\Projects\Chula Vista\0347_Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan\04 Design\GIS\MXD Files\Chula Vista Comm MP Phase Implementation.mxd/ 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 114 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 58 5.4 Cell Towers The City owns cell towers throughout Chula Vista that may be utilized for the traffic systems communications network. The implementation phasing plan does not consider use of the towers and focuses on cable based and point to point wireless communications. The towers may provide opportunities to reach areas not easily accessible by cable based systems. The towers could host broadband wireless and/or cellular radios to close gaps in City-owned infrastructure and/or support future ITS technology applications. Tower use would be determined on a case-by-case basis in engineering design phases. 5.5 Long-Term System ConsideraƟons Additional long-term system considerations are included to provide a more robust and reliable traffic signal communication network. These improvements are not part of the three-phase implementation plan but are recommended should additional funding become available. As opportunities arise, new fiber optic conduit and cable should be installed in place of broadband Ethernet wireless radios and fiber optic communication media should be installed in addition to the City-owned copper plant. Major signalized intersections should be upgraded to include stand-alone battery back-up systems, Global Positioning System (GPS) emergency vehicle preemption (EVP) systems, Ethernet-enabled conflict monitor units (CMU), and Power Cycle Relay Switches. Table 5-1 Long-Term System Improvement Order of Magnitude Costs IMPROVEMENT UNIT COST Trunk SMFOC Cable $5/LF Breakout SMFOC Cable $2/LF Fiber Optic Vault $2,500/Each Splice Closure $2,000/Each Fiber Distribution Unit $2,000/Each Standalone Battery Back-Up System $5,000 /Intersection GPS based Emergency Vehicle Preemption System $10,000 /Intersection Ethernet-Enabled Conflict Monitor Unit $1,000/Intersection Power Cycle Relay Switch $800/Intersection Adaptive Traffic Signal Deployment $25,000/Intersection 5.6 Fiber OpƟc CommunicaƟon Rings Topology Fiber optic conduit and cable will be installed during the various implementation plan phases to complete a redundant and self-healing fiber optic communication rings topology around the City. Primary rings, the fiber optic backbone of the communication network, will connect the TMC at City Hall to major roadways throughout Chula Vista including Eastlake Parkway, Fourth Avenue, H Street, L Street, Lane Avenue, Main Street, Olympic Parkway, Orange Avenue, Otay Lakes Road, Proctor Valley Road, and Telegraph Canyon 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 115 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 59 Road. A secondary ring will provide redundant and robust communications to the future Smart Bayfront area. Linear branches will connect the remaining traffic signals throughout the City to the fiber optic communications network via primary and/or secondary rings. Future development projects that include new traffic signal and roadway improvements should implement new fiber optic communications infrastructure and connect to the rings topology. Future fiber associated with planned development projects, as previously discussed in Section 3 should also connect to the rings topology and be implemented by the Developer per City guidance. The following recommendations are provided for all future fiber optic cable deployments, including existing conduit and new conduit installations: • Primary rings should be a minimum 144-strand of single-mode fiber optic cable. • Secondary ring should be a minimum 72-strand single-mode fiber optic cable. • Linear branches should be a minimum of 36-strand single-mode fiber optic cable. • Local drop connections, for fiber MFED connections, should be a 12-strand single-mode fiber optic cable. The fiber optic communications ring topology is depicted in Figure 5-4. Buildout of the future traffic systems communications network is summarized in Appendix F. 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 116 (###) (###) (###) (###) ### ### ### ### ### ñ$+ $+ $+ $+ !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$508 !"#$508 !"#$508 ·|}þ54·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 E H ST E J ST MAIN ST 04TH AVI ST OLYMPIC PYH ST03RD AV J ST E ST L ST F ST BAY BLOTAYLAKESRD HUNTE PYBROADWAYK ST E PALOMAR S THILLTOP DR D ST 01ST AV MOSS ST LAMEDI ARD PALOMAR ST05TH AV NAPLES ST TE L E GRAPH CA NYONRD ANITA ST 02ND AV E L ST E NAPLES S T ORANGE AV G ST C ST HERI T A G E R DLANEAVPROCTOR VALLEY RD PA S EOLADERA B O N IT A RDCLUB H O U S E D R E I ST EORA N G E A VE OXFORD S T FLOWER S T S RANCHO D E L R E Y PY N R A NCHODELREYPY PASEOD E LREYWUE STERDN 0 2 N D A VN GREEN S V IEWD R E X P L O RATIONFALLSDRCREST DRE F L O W E R S T E PALOMAR D R E H ST W U E S T E R D 05TH AV K ST02ND AVHERITAGE RDI ST 01ST AVBAY BL G ST ANITA STANITA ST 03RD AVC ST WUESTE RDMAIN KJ HERITAGEMONTACETRIBUTARYMAIN W BS T R E E T " A "SR 125 S A N T A M A R I S O L ARI OTAY VALLEY U N I V E R S I T Y STREET "E"STREET "I"STREET "D"S A N T A D A V I S S A N T A T I PO DI S C O V E R Y F A L L S SA N T A M A C H E T O CAR AWA Y STREET "F"CALLE SWANS E A SOLS T ICE STREET "D"SR 125MAINSR 1 2 5 OTAY VALLEY MAIN SAN DIEGO S.D. COUNTY CORONADO NATIONAL CITY SAN DIEGO IMPERIAL BEACH S.D. COUNTY LANDFILL S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY 255 115 117 114 116 118 173 135 150 128 (112)83(112)80 (113)68 (106)28 (114)73 (113)89 (103)41 (117)94 (117)90 (117)91 (109)31 (114)72 (113)71 (109)55 (108)54 (108)53 (105)24 (113)70 (109)58 (109)56 (106)32 (105)26 (105)25 (106)27 (123)22 (103)23 (113)69(108)52 (109)51(105)40 (108)79 (103)17 (108)49 (108)50(105)39 (104)38(123)20 (110)81 (108)84(108)82 (111)63 (111)85 (102)11 (102)12 (110)77(102)13 (110)78 (108)44(104)33 (123)15 (104)37 (108)48 (108)47(104)36 (123)16 (123)21 (111)86 (112)67 (112)66 (112)65 (123)19 (123)18 (108)46(104)35 (108)64 (104)34 (107)45 (107)43 (118)98 (108)93 (116)99 (125)125 (121)143 (117)286 (114)219 (103)281 (103)280 (117)278 (113)260 (120)217 (120)213 (106)136 (120)121 (117)104 (125)126 (117)105 (117)103 (116)154 (103)146 (125)127 (117)168 (116)110 (125)124 (105)192 (107)149 (115)108 (121)107 (125)142 (117)287 (124)221 (116)102 (120)112 (122)284 (121)263 (121)266 (121)267 (122)244 (124)271(124)270 (128)268 (128)269 (122)257(122)256(122)262(122)261 (122)251 (121)248 (121)247 (122)245 (122)243 (122)233 (122)222 (124)253 (124)220 (121)250 (125)228 (103)254 (127)246 (121)224 (121)225 (121)242 (121)241 (121)240 (121)239 (122)236(122)235 (128)234 (127)229 (121)226 (124)223 (118)218 (120)216 (128)214 (127)139 (118)165 (118)170 (118)174 (118)163 (118)162 (118)141 (118)169 (118)172 (118)183(118)182 (124)179 (124)178 (124)152 (118)171 (118)161 (118)153 (118)147 (118)144 (126)132 (126)131 (126)129 (116)100 (116)101 (126)140 (126)133 (127)167 (128)177 (124)164 (124)145 (128)181 (124)148 (127)138 (127)137 (124)158 (124)157(124)123(120)120 (115)159 (118)199 (116)197 (124)195 (128)202 (128)203 (128)201 (118)189 (124)211 (101)206(118)190 (128)200 (128)185 (128)204 (128)196 (116)193 (128)194 (128)186 (128)205 (124)191 (124)187 (124)208 (124)188 (124)184 EASTLAKE PY EAS T L A K E P Y BIRCH RD INDUSTR IAL BL PROCTOR VALLEY RD BRANDYWINE AVBONITA R D MT M I G U E L R D FLOWER ST PASEO RANCHEROMEDICAL CENTER DRSAN MIGUEL RANCH RD N 04TH AVTIERRA DEL REYARTISAN ST 03RD AVE 07TH STE NAPLES CT MAIN ST HERITAGE RD MAIN ST 113 119 (115)92 (106)29 (109)57(103)30 (114)75 (114)74 (114)76 (114)59 (113)88 (115)87 (110)61 (110)60 (102)14 (115)95 (110)62 (107)42 (118)96 (118)97 (122)265 (122)283 (122)285(122)288 (109)279 (116)109 (121)106 (102)151 (122)282 (128)273 (121)264 (122)237 (122)238 (122)259 (122)252 (128)258 (121)227 (128)215 (127)230 (118)156 (118)166 (124)176 (124)175 (126)130 (120)122 (126)111 (124)155 (124)134 (124)160 (122)207 (128)209 (121)198 Figure 5-4 Fiber Optic Communication Rings Topology Legend ###System Control Number (###)Communication Number $+Layer 3 Communication Hub !(Existing Traffic Signal !(Offline Existing Traffic Signal !(Future Traffic Signal Primary Fiber Optic Ring Secondary Fiber Optic Ring Future Roads City of Chula Vista ñ City Hall 0 0.5 10.25 Miles Document Path: S:\Projects\Chula Vista\0347_Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan\04 Design\GIS\MXD Files\Chula Vista Comm MP Phase Implementation.mxd/ 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 117 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 61 5.7 Order of Magnitude Cost EsƟmate A summary of the costs for Master Plan deployment, organized by the implementation phase, is shown on the following tables. Table 5-2 Phase 1 Deployment Cost Estimate ITEM # DESCRIPTION TOTAL 1 Fiber Optic Communications System Conversion to Ethernet $187,500 2 Leased Copper Conversion to City-Owned Broadband Wireless and Connected City-Owned Copper Conversion to Ethernet $2,556,000 3 Leased Cellular Traffic Measurement Devices Conversion to City- Owned Broadband Wireless $558,750 4 CCTV Camera Video Monitoring at Priority Locations $336,000 5 Dynamic Message Signs $285,000 6 Satellite Maintenance Facility Traffic Management Center $111,300 7 Traffic Signal Controller Ethernet Conversion Upgrade $160,200 8 Communications Hub Installation $600,000 Grand Total $4,794,750 Table 5-3 Phase 2 Deployment Cost Estimate ITEM # DESCRIPTION TOTAL 1 Existing Communications Conduit Upgrade $1,374,375 2 Fiber Optic Communications Rings Topology $4,610,700 3 Traffic Signal Equipment Upgrade on Priority Corridors $1,107,000 Grand Total $7,092,075 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 118 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 62 Table 5-4 Phase 3 Deployment Cost Estimate ITEM # DESCRIPTION TOTAL 1 Traffic Signal Equipment Upgrade at Remaining Intersections $3,763,500 2 Video Detection Equipment Upgrade $186,000 Grand Total $3,949,500 Table 5-5 Deployment Cost Estimate by Phase PHASE TOTAL 1 $4,794,750 2 $7,092,075 3 $3,949,500 Grand Total $15,836,325 The order of magnitude cost estimate for the Master Plan implementation is $15,836,325. The quantities in the estimate were obtained using information from the GIS database and aerial photography. Quantities for conduit were increased by 10% and fiber optic cable by 25% to account for unknown factors. This cost includes a construction contingency of 25% and soft costs such as engineering, project management, and construction management. The breakdown for each phase and item number is included in Appendix E. The goal of the Master Plan is to provide a citywide fiber optic communications network with state-of-the- art traffic signal communications devices and systems. Financial constraints typically necessitate partial phase implementation. If funding is limited, the focus should start at the TMC and move outward. Intersections along major corridors should be prioritized first before implementing upgrades to intersections on less critical streets. 5.8 ConnecƟon to City FaciliƟes Establishing a citywide fiber optic traffic signal communication system provides opportunities to connect other facilities throughout the City. These include City Hall, police stations, fire stations, libraries, and parks. The facilities can be connected to the fiber optic network individually as the system expands to adjacent corridors and intersections. The integration of the facilities by phase are shown in Figure 5-6. A cost estimate for the deployment of facility connections is shown in Table 5-6 below. Table 5-6 Deployment Cost Estimate of Connection to City Facilities PHASE TOTAL 1 $80,850 2 $254,400 3 $641,400 Grand Total $976,650 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 119 # # # # (###) (###) (###) (###) ### ### ### ### ### ñ !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !H ²ï³ ²ï³ ²ï³!H!H!â ²ï³ !H !H ²ï³ !H ²ï³ !H ²ï³ !H ²ï³²ï³ !H ²ï³ !H²ï³ !H !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$508 !"#$508 !"#$508 ·|}þ54·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 2 2 2 1 3 1 E H ST E J ST MAIN ST04TH AVI ST OLYMPIC PYH ST03RD AV J ST E ST L ST F ST BAY BLOTAYLAKESRD HUNTEPYBROADWAYK ST E PALOMAR S THILLTOP DR D ST 01ST AV MOSS ST LAMEDI ARD PALOMAR ST05TH AV NAPLES ST TE L E GRAPH CA NYONRD ANITA ST 02ND AV E L ST E NAPLES S T ORANGE AV G ST C ST HERI T A G E R DLANEAVPROCTOR VALLEY RD PA S EOLADERAB O N IT A RDCLUB H O U S E D R E I ST EORA N G E A VE OXFORD S T FLOWER S T S RANCHO D E L R E Y PY N R A NCHODELREYPY PASEOD E LREYWU E STERDN 0 2 N D A VN GREEN S V IEW D R E X P L O RATIONFALLSDRCREST DRE F L O W E R S T E PALOMAR D R E H ST 05TH AV K ST02ND AVHERITAGE RDI ST 01ST AVBAY BL G ST ANITA STANITA ST 03RD AVC ST WUESTE RDMAIN KJ HERITAGEMONTACETRIBUTARYMAIN W BS T R E E T " A "SR 125 S A N T A M A R I S O L ARI OTAY VALLEY U N I V E R S I T Y STREET "E"STREET "I"STREET "D"S A N T A D A V I S S AN T A T I PO DI S C O V E R Y F A L L S SA N T A M A C H E T O CAR AW AY STREET "F"CALLE SWANS E A SOLS T ICE STREET "D"SR 125MAINSR 1 2 5 OTAY VALLEY MAIN SAN DIEGO S.D. COUNTY CORONADO NATIONAL CITY SAN DIEGO IMPERIAL BEACH S.D. COUNTY LANDFILL S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY 255 115 117 114 116 118 173 135 150 128 (112)83(112)80 (113)68 (106)28 (114)73 (113)89 (103)41 (117)94 (117)90 (117)91 (109)31 (114)72 (113)71 (109)55 (108)54 (108)53 (105)24 (113)70 (109)58 (109)56 (106)32 (105)26 (105)25 (106)27 (123)22 (103)23 (113)69(108)52 (109)51(105)40 (108)79 (103)17 (108)49 (108)50(105)39 (104)38(123)20 (110)81 (108)84(108)82 (111)63 (111)85 (102)11 (102)12 (110)77(102)13 (110)78 (108)44(104)33 (123)15 (104)37 (108)48 (108)47(104)36 (123)16 (123)21 (111)86 (112)67 (112)66 (112)65 (123)19 (123)18 (108)46(104)35 (108)64 (104)34 (107)45 (107)43 (118)98 (108)93 (116)99 (125)125 (121)143 (117)286 (114)219 (103)281 (103)280 (117)278 (113)260 (120)217 (120)213 (106)136 (120)121 (117)104 (125)126 (117)105 (117)103 (103)146 (125)127 (116)110 (125)124 (105)192 (107)149 (115)108 (121)107 (125)142 (117)287 (124)221 (116)102 (120)112 (121)263 (121)266 (121)267 (122)244 (124)271(124)270 (128)268 (128)269 (122)237 (122)257(122)256(122)262(122)261 (122)251 (121)248 (121)247 (122)245 (122)243 (122)233 (122)222 (124)253 (124)220 (121)250 (125)228 (103)254 (127)246 (121)224 (121)225 (121)242 (121)241 (121)240 (121)239 (122)236(122)235 (128)234 (127)229 (121)226 (124)223 (118)218 (120)216 (128)214 (127)139 (118)165 (118)170 (118)174 (118)163 (118)162 (118)141 (118)169 (118)172(118)182 (124)179 (124)178 (124)152 (118)171 (118)161 (118)153 (118)147 (118)144 (126)132 (126)131 (126)129 (116)100 (116)101 (126)140 (126)133 (127)167 (128)177 (124)164 (124)145 (128)181 (124)148 (127)138 (127)137 (124)158 (124)157(124)123(120)120 (115)159 (118)199 (116)197 (124)195 (128)202 (128)203 (128)201 (118)189 (124)211 (101)206(118)190 (128)200 (128)185 (128)204 (128)196 (116)193 (128)194 (128)186 (128)205 (124)191 (124)187 (124)208 (124)188 (124)184 3 3 3 2 EASTLAKE PY EAS T L A K E P Y BIRCH RD INDUSTR IAL BL PROCTOR VALLEY RD BRANDYWINE AVBONITA R D MT M I G U E L R D FLOWER ST PASEO RANCHEROMEDICAL CENTER DRSAN MIGUEL RANCH R D N 04TH AVTIERRA DEL REYARTISAN ST 03RD AVE 07TH STE NAPLES CT W U E S T E R D MAIN ST HERITAGE RD MAIN ST 113 119 (115)92 (106)29 (109)57(103)30 (114)75 (114)74 (114)76 (114)59 (113)88 (115)87 (110)61 (110)60 (102)14 (115)95 (110)62 (107)42 (118)96 (118)97 (122)265 (122)283 (122)285(122)288 (109)279 (116)154 (116)109 (117)168 (121)106 (102)151 (122)284 (122)282 (128)273 (121)264 (122)238 (122)259 (122)252 (128)258 (121)227 (128)215 (127)230 (118)156 (118)166 (118)183 (124)176 (124)175 (126)130 (120)122 (126)111 (124)155 (124)134 (124)160 (122)207 (128)209 (121)198 Figure 5-5 Communications System Extension per City Facilities Legend ###System Control Number (###)Communication Number#Implementation Phase Number !(Existing Traffic Signal !(Offline Existing Traffic Signal !(Future Traffic Signal !(Existing Caltrans Traffic Signal !(Future Caltrans Traffic Signal Existing Fiber Future Fiber Phase 2 New Fiber in Existing COMM Conduit Phase 2 New Fiber in New Conduit Phase 2 New Fiber in Existing Copper Conduit Future Roads City of Chula Vista ñ City Hall Facility Type ²ï³Fire Stations ²ï³Future Fire Stations !H City Park !H Government Offices & Civic Centers !â Police Station 0 0.5 10.25 Miles Document Path: S:\Projects\Chula Vista\0347_Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan\04 Design\GIS\MXD Files\Chula Vista Comm Phase Implementation Figures.mxd/!( !( !( !( ²ï³ !H !H !â !H ñ 1 F ST E ST 04TH AV05TH AV03RD AV (104)34 (107)45 (110)61 Civic Center / 0 500 1,000250Feet 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 120 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 64 5.9 Funding Sources The City of Chula Vista’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP) budget for traffic signal and street related projects is primarily supported by the Transportation Sales Tax (TransNet) and Gas Tax. The City’s Transportation Development Impact fees and Transportation grants from the Active Transportation Program (ATP) and Federal Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) also provide funding. Potential funding sources for the City’s Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan are identified in the following. 5.9.1 TransportaƟon Sales Tax (TransNet) Established in 1988, the Transportation Sales Tax (TransNet) is a half-cent sales tax collected by the State of California that is dedicated to transportation improvements in the San Diego region. The program was extended in 2008 for 40 years for $14 billion. The regional metropolitan planning agency, San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG), allocates funds to municipalities within San Diego County and supports highway, transit, and local street improvements. SANDAG administers funds, as determined by the SANDAG Board of Directors, based on the locally adopted Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), which is updated every three years1. Majority approval from the SANDAG Board of Directors and identification of need, as demonstrated in this document, is required to commit TransNet revenue for future deployment of Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan projects. 5.9.2 General Use Sales Tax Measure P, a temporary half-cent general use sales tax, was approved by voters in Chula Vista. The tax went into effect April 1, 2017 and is expected to generate about $160 million over a 10-year period to repair, replace, and update failing/obsolete City infrastructure including streets, storm drains, public safety equipment, and parks. The tax revenue will be part of the City’s General Fund and a citizen oversight committee will be responsible for annual spending plans, accounting, and advising2. 5.9.3 Gas Tax Voters approved Proposition 42, utilizing sales tax on fuel to provide funding for City street improvements. These funds have primarily served to augment the City’s annual pavement rehabilitation efforts but has also included street reconstruction projects3. 5.9.4 Development Impact Fees (DIF) Development Impact Fees (DIF) are collected to mitigate the impact of new development to maintain existing levels of services throughout the community. 5.9.4.1 Transportation Development Impact Fee (TDIF) The City of Chula Vista Transportation Development Impact Fee (TDIF) Program was established in 1988 and collects development impact fees to be used for constructing transportation facilities to accommodate increased traffic generated by new development within the City’s eastern territories4. 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 121 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 65 5.9.4.2 Traffic Signal Fee The City’s Traffic Signal Fee is a trip-based development impact fee associated with the issuance of building permits for new construction. This fee can be utilized for the installation and upgrade of traffic signals throughout the City, including traffic signal modifications and pedestrian improvements5. 5.9.5 City General Funds/Capital Improvement Program The City of Chula Vista’s proposed budget for fiscal year (FY) 2017-2018 includes a CIP budget of $73,871,967 for capital improvement projects citywide. The forecasted five-year CIP program budget is estimated at $133,310,588. The FY 17/18 CIP budget is larger than typical due to Measure P funds. Table 5-7 provides a summary of forecasted CIP budgets6. However, the CIP budgets are subject to change based on new grant opportunities and/or additional Measure P funds. Table 5-7 FY 17/18-FY 21/22 Forecasted CIP Budget FY 17/18 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 TOTAL $73,871,967 $15,846,025 $16,265,806 $15,052,802 $12,273,988 $133,310,588 Roadway infrastructure is a major investment of the CIP funds with the bulk allocated to street repairs and other hardscape improvements. To achieve funding for the improvements identified by the Master Plan, a prioritization and recommendation for adoption in the next fiscal year CIP budget and/or as a reassignment of funds in the current fiscal year’s budget is necessary. 5.9.6 Grant OpportuniƟes Grant opportunities for various types of transportation and roadway related infrastructure improvements are available. The most applicable grants for funding the Master Plan improvements are as follows: 5.9.6.1 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funds The City receives annual Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds for community development activities, including capital improvement projects. The bulk of the funds are allotted to the completion of the Castle Park Infrastructure Projects however, approximately $300,000-$500,000 are available for other capital improvement projects, including roadway related projects, annually for the next 14 years 7. 5.9.6.2 Advanced Transportation and Congestion Management Technologies Deployment (ATCMTD) The Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act) established the Advanced Transportation and Congestion Management Technologies Deployment Grant Program to develop model deployment sites for large scale installation and operation of advanced transportation technologies. The goal of the program is to improve safety, efficiency, system performance, and infrastructure return-on-investment. Funds are obtained through the Highway Research and Development, Technology and Innovation Deployment, and Intelligent Transportation System Research Programs and $60 million dollars is authorized for each fiscal 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 122 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 66 year from 2016 to 2020. It is recommended that the City apply for future grant funding opportunities for innovative transportation technologies identified in the Master Plan that meet the required criteria8. 5.9.6.3 Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) The Map-21 Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) is a data-driven strategic approach to improving highway safety on all public roads. Performance-based, this program achieves a significant reduction in traffic fatalities and serious injuries on all public roadways. A highway safety improvement project is any strategy, activity, or project on a public road that is consistent with the data-driven State Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) and corrects or improves a hazardous road location or feature or addresses a highway safety problem9. It is recommended that the City apply for HSIP funding as improvements recommended in the Master Plan qualify for the grant. Also notable is the staff time required to apply for and administer the grant. Additionally, funding matches by the City may be required dependent on project improvements. 5.9.7 Assembly Bill 1447 Assembly Bill 1447 was passed on August 20, 2014 and clarifies that synchronization projects can qualify for money raised by the California Cap-and-Trade program, which seeks to cut greenhouse gas emissions. The carbon marketplace has generated approximately $5 billion in revenue since initiated in 201210. The Cap-and-Trade program money is held by the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund. The Master Plan improvements qualify for funding through this legislation with the recommended technology being proven to reduce Green House Gasses (GHG’s). As the process for administering these funds for traffic synchronization projects is determined, the City should present Master Plan improvements for funding. 5.9.8 Partnerships Rising demand for high speed communication has increased the rate of telecommunication installation and upgrades in both the public and private sectors. Utilizing partnerships with interested parties could advance the Master Plan build. Each entity is unique and the best approach to partnering will depend on the factors involved. 5.9.8.1 Public-Private Partnership As private companies and public agencies expand their telecommunication networks in Chula Vista, there may be opportunities for the City or private company to partner and cost share the installation and expansion of network infrastructure. The City should develop a policy to review planned installations of utilities within the City and cross reference the Master Plan for overlapping locations or additional routes for redundancy. It is important that the City maintain control over its facility. Maintenance access, expansion, and future allocations require as high a degree as possible of physical separation. Order of precedence for infrastructure installation through public-private partnerships is as follows: 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 123 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 67 • Install City-owned conduit, vaults, and cable. This is most desirable and most expensive and unless associated with new construction can be cost prohibitive. • Install separate cable in shared conduit and separate splice enclosures. • Install shared cable and for proper segregation and maintenance of the system the minimum granularity of fiber designated for City allocation should be 12 (a complete buffer tube). • If existing cable and limited fiber strands designate a minimum of 4 fibers for the City. • The least desirable arrangement is sharing the same fiber with non-City entities. Development projects should be conditioned to implement communication systems infrastructure as part of the overall facilities improvement requirements. This includes communications ducts, cable, splice vaults, and connectivity to City facilities. 5.9.8.1.1 Small Cell Networks The telecommunications industry is utilizing small cell networks to expand wireless carrier network coverage and increase capacity for both voice and data across new generation mobile phone technology and Wi-Fi networks. In comparison to traditional cell towers, small cell networks utilize smaller nodes that require lower power and cover smaller areas. Increased node density enables larger coverage areas with more capacity than a traditional cell tower can provide. Nodes are installed on existing infrastructure such as telephone poles or street lights and connected to a central hub by fiber optic cable. This provides local agencies with opportunities to partner with private companies and receive infrastructure improvements in exchange for furthering current telecommunications company pursuits. For example, an agency could allow installation of nodes on City-owned street lights and fiber optic cable in City right-of-way in exchange for City-owned conduit and fiber optic cable installed by the private company. Different agreements of different magnitudes, such as full-funding or shared-cost partnerships, can be made. Small cell network partnerships can provide a good opportunity for an agency to obtain needed infrastructure at reduced costs outside of the CIP process. 5.9.8.2 Public-Public Partnerships Like public-private partnerships there are opportunities to construct communications infrastructure through public-public partnerships. These would be interdepartmental projects within the City with Parks/ Recreation, Wastewater, IT, Police/Fire, and Public Works. These would also be regional or adjacent agency projects such as SANDAG, Caltrans, MTS, Port of San Diego, and the City of San Diego. Any construction that requires opening a trench in the public Right-of-Way is an opportunity for the City to have a conduit and vaults installed at no cost or a shared cost since the cost of construction is already incurred. Additionally, existing and future street lighting system conduit should also be considered for establishing communications to traffic signals, other City Departments, and/or for Smart City initiatives. 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 124 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 68 5.10 Procurement and Delivery Methods The City of Chula Vista’s traffic signal communications system procurement choices impact deployment effectiveness and Return on Investment (ROI). Procurement and delivery methods include: best value procurement, design-bid-build, design-build, and system manager-integrator. The challenge associated with choosing the optimum procurement and delivery method lies in tailoring the specific work into bid packages and projects that achieve balance in technical complexity, system quality, cost savings, and deployment schedule. Many of the Master Plan systems are able to be deployed incrementally by system as well as all at once by a given area or group of areas. Contracting options are as follows: 5.10.1 Best Value Procurement The Best Value Procurement process includes an analysis of technical alternatives to identify potential new systems that flow into a set of system requirements, becoming a technical specification. These technical specifications are incorporated into the “best-value” bid packages for equipment procurement. This typically results in reduced pricing as vendors compete with one other for equipment purchase agreements directly with the agency rather than through a contractor. The best value bid packages and equipment purchase agreements enable rapid system procurement of desired elements, ultimately benefiting the schedule significantly in comparison to typical bid advertisement processes. The systems can be installed and integrated by agency staff, the agency’s on-call consultant firm, and/or a contract maintenance company11. 5.10.2 Design-Bid-Build Design–Bid–Build (D-B-B) is the traditional project delivery method where the agency contracts with separate entities for the design and construction of a project. The three main phases that occur sequentially during the D-B-B method include: design phase, bidding phase, and construction12. This delivery method can be used effectively to deploy physical Master Plan components such as communications infrastructure (conduit systems, fiber optic cable, pull boxes, etc.), foundations, and structure. However, it may not be suited for ITS projects involving software development, computer hardware, system integration, and system configuration. This method may be counterproductive for ITS applications as they cannot be effectively separated into design and construction services. The lowest bid may result in a contractor that is incapable of performing the required ITS-related services. 5.10.3 Design-Build The Design–Build (D–B) project delivery method includes the contract of design and construction services by a single entity known as the design-build contractor. This contrasts from the Design-Bid-Build project delivery method in that the Design-Build utilizes a single point of contract responsibility, minimizing risks for the project owner and reducing the delivery schedule by overlapping the design and construction phases of the project. One single contract is awarded to a design-build team who is responsible for13: • System engineering, design, and specifications. 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 125 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 69 • Procurement and provision of all products, systems, and services. • Construction of all system elements. • Testing, inspection, and integration of various subsystems. Proceeding with the Design-Build project delivery method depends on agency policy and implementation timelines, and well-defined functional specifications. Project costs associated with D-B delivery method are typically higher due to the contractor taking on greater responsibility. This method may also result in engineering decisions being influenced by the builder in a contest of best design versus cost. 5.10.4 System Manager – Integrator The System Manager-Integrator (SM-I) delivery method includes a consultant, under an engineering and design services contract, that performs or oversees the performance of all system/project engineering, design, interface, integration, and configuration functions while one or more contractors, under a construction contract, performs all related construction activities. This project delivery method combines design and implementation of work components under one contract including: testing, integration, configuration, and procurement support. These components of work are the most complex and require advanced expertise but are typically small in terms of total project costs. The System Manager-Integrator services are procured based on qualifications which enables the agency to have a high degree of control through a single point of management 14. 5.11 Master Plan Cost and Beneﬁt Analysis Implementation of the Master Plan is an investment in traffic systems technology that will improve traffic management, promote an environment for economic growth, and increase quality of life for Chula Vista residents. Implementation phasing costs, travel time, fuel, and emissions benefits were analyzed and a significant return on investment was identified. 5.11.1 Master Plan Costs The annual Master Plan investment is summarized by phase in Table 5-8 and on Figure 5-6. Phase 1 prioritizes City-owned communications infrastructure and ITS elements including CCTV cameras, fixed and portable CMS’s, and a Sattelite TMC at the City’s Traffic Signal Maintenance facility. Phase 2 upgrades twisted pair copper in existing conduit and wireless communications to fiber optic communications and upgrades priority corridors with the 2070 ATC controller platform and CCTV cameras. Phase 3 upgrades remaining signals to the 2070 ATC platform and converts analog video detection to Ethernet. ITS elements for Phase 3 also include CCTV cameras. 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 126 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 70 Table 5-8 Master Plan Spending by Phase YEAR PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 3 TOTAL COMM’S ITS ELEMENTS COMM’S ITS ELEMENTS COMM’S ITS ELEMENTS 1 $1,354,150 $244,100 - - - - $1,598,250 2 $1,354,150 $244,100 - - - - $1,598,250 3 $1,354,150 $244,100 - - - - $1,598,250 4 - - $1,635,019 $138,000 - - $1,773,019 5 - - $1,635,019 $138,000 - - $1,773,019 6 - - $1,635,019 $138,000 - - $1,773,019 7 - - $1,635,019 $138,000 - - $1,773,019 8 - - - - $544,500 $772,000 $1,316,500 9 - - - - $544,500 $772,000 $1,316,500 10 - - - - $544,500 $772,000 $1,316,500 Subtotal $4,062,450 $732,300 $6,540,075 $552,000 $1,633,500 $2,316,000 - Total $4,794,750 $7,092,075 $3,949,500 $15,836,325 5.11.2 Master Plan Beneﬁts Annual benefits for travel time, fuel consumption, and Carbon Monoxide emissions were estimated based on Phase 1 implementation. Table 5-9 below provides a summary of the annual Phase 1 monetary benefit saving in comparison with the annual Phase 1 implementation costs. Table 5-9 Phase 1 Benefit Summary (Per Year) # OF INT1 TT2 (HR) FUEL CON3 (GAL) CO EMISS4 (MT CO2E) TT SAVINGS5 FUEL SAVINGS6 CO EMISS SAVINGS7 PHASE 1 ANNUAL SAVINGS PHASE 1 ANNUAL COST BENEFIT : COST 267 -1.399M -34.223M -28,755 $764,107 $99.931M $3,306,769 $104.002M $1.598M 65 INT=Intersections, TT=Travel Time, CON=Consumption, EMISS=Emissions 1. Total number of intersections affected during Phase 1. 2. Hours spend in traffic in Chula Vista (46.2 hours per year per traveler) based on the INRIX 2016 Global Traffic Scorecard. 76% of the City’s population drives to work based on data from Zip Atlas. 15% typical improvement in travel time for synchronization per ITE Typical Savings. 3. Fuel saved per intersection of 7,835 gallons/day with 260 work week days based on Fuel Savings from Retiming for 140 traffic signals with existing coordination timing. Typical 12% reduction in fuel usage based on signal synchronization per ITE Typical Savings. 4. Average CO2e of 41,078 lbs per 200 signals based on average savings documented from LADOT and OCTA’s signal synchronization projects. 5. Travel Time savings of $16.79/hour of person travel based on 2015 Urban Mobility Report per Texas A&M Transportation Institute. 6. Fuel Consumption savings of $2.92 based on CA State average cost/gallon of gasoline and diesel per US Energy Information Administration. 7. CO emissions savings of $115/ton based on Highway Economic Requirements System Technical Report per US Department of Transportation. 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 127 $1,354,150 $1,354,150 $1,354,150 $1,635,019 $1,635,019 $1,635,019 $1,635,019 $544,500 $544,500 $544,500 $244,100 $244,100 $244,100 $138,000 $138,000 $138,000 $138,000 $772,000 $772,000 $772,000 $0 $200,000 $400,000 $600,000 $800,000 $1,000,000 $1,200,000 $1,400,000 $1,600,000 $1,800,000 $2,000,000 12345678910 YEARS CHARTTITLE Communications ITSElements S:\Projects\Chula Vista\0347_Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan\06 Excel-Calcs\Cost Benefits AnalysisFigure 5-6 Annual Master Plan Investment by Phase2017-08-15 Agenda PacketPage 128 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 72 5.11.3 Cost EffecƟveness Based on the cost-effectiveness methodology presented above, the resulting annual benefit-cost ratio for implementing Phase 1 is 65:1. This indicates that improvements would yield benefits of $65 dollars for every $1 dollar spent. With cost savings exceeding the State and National benefit-cost ratio range of 20 to 60:1 ROI for Phase 1 alone, the monetary investments identified in the Master Plan are poised to be recaptured many times over for both economic and social benefit. 5.11.4 Master Plan Maintenance The Master Plan maps should be kept updated every 6 months to reflect changes in the system topology and architecture. This will require transfer of the GIS files developed for the Master Plan and coordination with the City’s Information Technology Services GIS group. A full review and update of the Master Plan should take place every 5 years as an addendum to the original document. 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 129 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 73 6 References Executive Summary • 1: City of Chula Vista GIS Shapefiles, City of Chula Vista, March 2016 • 2: Chula Vista Bayfront Roadway Plan, City of Chula Vista, June 2016 Chula Vista Main Street Streetscape Master Plan, City of Chula Vista, September 2015 Otay Ranch Villages Sectional Planning Area Plans, City of Chula Vista, 2016 • 3: City of Chula Vista Private Line Service Billing, AT&T, July 2016 1. Introduction • 1: Largest Cities in San Diego County by Population, United States Census Bureau, 2010 • 2: Land Area in Square Miles, United States Census Bureau, 2010 • 3: Largest Cities in San Diego County by Population, United States Census Bureau 2010 Census, 2010 • 4: List of Largest California Cities by Population, United States Census Bureau, July 2014 • 5: Chula Vista Bayfront Master Plan Website, Port of San Diego, 2017 • 6: Smart City Chula Vista, City of Chula Vista, February 2016 • 7: “Chula Vista Launches ACT Chula Vista” News Article, July 2014 • 8: About ITS Standards: Systems Engineering, United States Department of Transportation Office of the Assistant Secretary for Research and Technology Intelligent Transportation Systems Joint Program Office • 9: San Diego Regional Intelligent Transportation Systems Strategic Plan, San Diego Association of Governments, August 2011 • 10: SANDAG 2050 Regional Transportation Plan, San Diego Association of Governments, October 2011 • 11: California Strategic Highway Safety Plan, Office of Traffic Safety, 2013 • 12: California Local Roadway Safety Manual, United States Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration, April 2013 • 13: About ITS Standards: National ITS Architecture, United States Department of Transportation Office of the Assistant Secretary for Research and Te chnology Intelligent Transportation Systems Joint Program Office 2. Existing Systems Assessment • 1: City of Chula Vista Private Line Service Billing, AT&T, July 2016 • 2: City Hall Building Plans, City of Chula Vista, April 2016 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 130 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 74 • 3: Evaluation Report: Adaptive Traffic Control System Using SCATS, City of Chula Vista, March 2016 • 4: SCATS Network Layout Report, City of Chula Vista, March 2016 • 5: South Bay Rapid Fact Sheet, San Diego Association of Governments, August 2016 • 6: Traffic Engineering, City of Chula Vista Public Works Department Engineering Website, 2017 • 7: Traffic Operations, City of Chula Vista Public Works Department Operations Website, 2017 3. Needs Assessment • 1: City Traffic Signal Infrastructure and Devices Records Research, City of Chula Vista, 2016 • 2: Chula Vista Bayfront Roadway Plan, City of Chula Vista, June 2016 • 3: Chula Vista Main Street Streetscape Master Plan, City of Chula Vista, September 2015 • 4: Otay Ranch Villages Sectional Planning Area Plans, City of Chula Vista, 2016 • 5: Installation of Adaptive Traffic Control System RFB, City of Chula Vista, August 2016 4. Future System Architecture and ITS Elements • 1: Bandwidth for IP Video Surveillance Systems, IPVM, January 2017 • 2: Region Chosen As Autonomous Vehicle Proving Ground, San Diego Association of Governments, January 2017 • 3: The San Diego Region – A Proposed Designated Automated Vehicle Proving Grounds, San Diego Association of Governments, December 2016 • 4: The AASHTO National Connected Vehicle SPaT Deployment Challenge, United States Department of Transportation’s National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, December 2016 • 5: SPaT Challenge Folio: Quick Facts and Message, National Operations of Excellence, 2017 • 6: Personal Signal Assistant, Traffic Technology Services, 2017 • 7: V2If Device Technology and Innovations, Connected Signals, 2017 • 8: San Diego to Deploy World’s Largest City-Based ‘Internet of Things’ Platform Using Smart Streetlights, City of San Diego, February 2017 • 9: Providing Emerging ITS Data to the Public Webinar, United States Department of Transportation Intelligent Transportation Systems Joint Program Office, 2017 5. Implementation Phasing Plan • 1: About TransNet, TransNet Keep San Diego Moving, 2017 • 2: San Diego Registrar of Voters, Measure P, September 2016 • 3: California Proposition 42 Allocation of Gas Tax Revenues, Ballotpedia, March 2002 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 131 Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Page | 75 • 4: City of Chula Vista Proposed Budget Fiscal Year 2017-2018, City of Chula Vista, 2017 • 5: City of Chula Vista Proposed Budget Fiscal Year 2017-2018, City of Chula Vista, 2017 • 6: City of Chula Vista Proposed Budget Fiscal Year 2017-2018, City of Chula Vista, 2017 • 7: City of Chula Vista Proposed Budget Fiscal Year 2017-2018, City of Chula Vista, 2017 • 8: Federal Highway Administration Advanced Transportation and Congestion Management Technologies Deployment Fact Sheet, United States Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration, February 2017 • 9: Highway Safety Improvements Program, Caltrans, April 2017 • 10: Summary of Auction Proceeds, California Air Resources Board, June 2017 • 11: Best Value in Government Procurement: Concepts and Practices, NIGP Institute for Public Procurement, 2013 • 12: Best Value in Government Procurement: Concepts and Practices, NIGP Institute for Public Procurement, 2013 • 13: Best Value in Government Procurement: Concepts and Practices, NIGP Institute for Public Procurement, 2013 • 14: Implementation and Operation, National Transportation Library, April 1994 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 132 APPENDIX A EXISTING TRAFFIC SYSTEMS TOPOLOGY AND FUTURE IMPROVEMENTS OPPORTUNITY AREAS 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 133 (###) (###) (###) (###) ### ### ### ### ### # # # # # # # # ## # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # ## # # # # # # # # ## # # # ### # # # # # # #### # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # ##### # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # ## # # #### # # # ## # ## # # # # # # # # # ## ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!ñ XY XY XY XY XY XYXY XYXY XY XY XY XY XY XY XY XY XYXY XY XY XY XY XY XYXY XY XY XY XYXYXY XY XYXYXY XY XY XY XY XYXY XYXYXY XY !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( ") ") ")") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ")") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ")") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ")") ") ") ") ") ") ")") ") ") ")") ") ") #* #* #*#*#*#*#*#* #*#* #* #* #*#*#*#*#*#*#* #* #* #* #* #*#* #*#*#* #* #*#* ") ") !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$508 !"#$508 ·|}þ54·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 E H ST E J ST MAIN ST 04TH AVI ST OLYMPIC PYH ST03RD AV J ST E ST L ST F ST BAY BLOTAYLAKESRD HUNTE PYBROADWAYK ST E PALOMAR S THILLTOP DR D ST 01ST AV MOSS ST LAMEDI ARD PALOMAR ST05TH AV NAPLES ST TE L E GRAPH CA NYONRD ANITA ST 02ND AV E L ST E NAPLES S T ORANGE AV G ST C ST HERI T A G E R DLANEAVPROCTOR VALLEY RD PA S EOLADERA B O N IT A RDCLUB H O U S E D R E I ST EORA N G E A VE OXFORD S T FLOWER S T S RANCHO D E L R E Y PY N R A NCHODELREYPY PASEO D E LREYWUE STERDN 0 2 N D A VN G REEN S V IEWD R E X P L O RATIONFALLSDRCREST DRE F L O W E R S T E PALOMAR D R E H ST W U E S T E R D 05TH AV K ST02ND AVHERITAGE RDI ST 01ST AVBAY BL G ST ANITA STANITA ST 03RD AVC ST WUESTE RDMAIN KJ HERITAGEMONTACETRIBUTARYMAIN W BS T R E E T " A "SR 125 S A N T A M A R I S O L ARI OTAY VALLEY U N I V E R S I T Y STREET "E"STREET "I"STREET "D"S A N T A D A V I S S A N T A T I PO DI S C O V E R Y F A L L S SA N T A M A C H E T O CAR AWA Y STREET "F"CALLE SWANS E A SOLS T ICE STREET "D"SR 125MAINSR 1 2 5 OTAY VALLEY MAIN SAN DIEGO S.D. COUNTY CORONADO NATIONAL CITY SAN DIEGO IMPERIAL BEACH S.D. COUNTY LANDFILL S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY 255115 117 114 116 118 173 135 150 128 (112)83(112)80 (113)68 (106)28 (114)73 (113)89 (103)41 (117)94 (117)90 (117)91 (109)31 (114)72 (113)71 (109)55 (108)54 (108)53 (105)24 (113)70 (109)58 (109)56 (106)32 (105)26 (105)25 (106)27 (123)22 (103)23 (113)69(108)52 (109)51(105)40 (108)79 (103)17 (108)49 (108)50(105)39 (104)38(123)20 (110)81 (108)84(108)82 (111)63 (111)85 (102)11 (102)12 (110)77(102)13 (110)78 (108)44(104)33 (123)15 (104)37 (108)48 (108)47(104)36 (123)16 (123)21 (111)86 (112)67 (112)66 (112)65 (123)19 (123)18 (108)46(104)35 (108)64 (104)34 (107)45 (107)43 (118)98 (108)93 (116)99 (125)125 (121)143 (117)286 (114)219 (103)281 (103)280 (117)278 (113)260 (120)217 (120)213 (106)136 (120)121 (117)104 (125)126 (117)105 (117)103 (116)154 (103)146 (125)127 (117)168 (116)110 (125)124 (105)192 (107)149 (115)108 (121)107 (125)142 (117)287 (124)221 (116)102 (120)112 (122)284 (121)263 (121)266 (121)267 (122)244 (124)271(124)270 (128)268 (128)269 (122)257(122)256(122)262(122)261 (122)251 (121)248 (121)247 (122)245 (122)243 (122)233 (122)222 (124)253 (124)220 (121)250 (125)228 (103)254 (127)246 (121)224 (121)225 (121)242 (121)241 (121)240 (121)239 (122)236(122)235 (128)234 (127)229 (121)226 (124)223 (118)218 (120)216 (128)214 (127)139 (118)165 (118)170 (118)174 (118)163 (118)162 (118)141 (118)169 (118)172 (118)183(118)182 (124)179 (124)178 (124)152 (118)171 (118)161 (118)153 (118)147 (118)144 (126)132 (126)131 (126)129 (116)100 (116)101 (126)140 (126)133 (127)167 (128)177 (124)164 (124)145 (128)181 (124)148 (127)138 (127)137 (124)158 (124)157(124)123(120)120 (115)159 (118)199 (116)197 (124)195 (128)202 (128)203 (128)201 (118)189 (124)211 (101)206(118)190 (128)200 (128)185 (128)204 (128)196 (116)193 (128)194 (128)186 (128)205 (124)191 (124)187 (124)208 (124)188 (124)184 EASTLAKE PY EAS T L A K E P Y BIRCH RD INDUSTR IAL BL PROCTOR VALLEY RD BRANDYWINE AVBONITA R D MT M I G U E L R D FLOWER ST PASEO RANCHEROMEDICAL CENTER DRSAN MIGUEL RANCH RD N 04TH AVTIERRA DEL REYARTISAN ST 03RD AVE 07TH STE NAPLES CT MAIN ST HERITAGE RD MAIN ST 113 119 (115)92 (106)29 (109)57(103)30 (114)75 (114)74 (114)76 (114)59 (113)88 (115)87 (110)61 (110)60 (102)14 (115)95 (110)62 (107)42 (118)96 (118)97 (122)265 (122)283 (122)285(122)288 (109)279 (116)109 (121)106 (102)151 (122)282 (128)273 (121)264 (122)237 (122)238 (122)259 (122)252 (128)258 (121)227 (128)215 (127)230 (118)156 (118)166 (124)176 (124)175 (126)130 (120)122 (126)111 (124)155 (124)134 (124)160 (122)207 (128)209 (121)198 City of Chula VistaTraffic Signal Communications Master PlanExisting Traffic Systems Topology and Future Improvements Opportunity Areas Legend ###System Control Number (###)Communication Number ")Telephone Drop Traffic Signal ")Offline Telephone Drop Traffic Signal #*Existing Adaptive Traffic Signal #*Future Adaptive Traffic Signal !(Existing Traffic Signal !(Offline Existing Traffic Signal !(Future Traffic Signal !(Existing Caltrans Traffic Signal !(Future Caltrans Traffic Signal XY Traffic Measurement Device #Ç City-Owned Wireless Towers #Private Wireless Towers Existing Copper Future Copper ! !Existing Wireless Traffic Interconnect ! !Future Wireless Traffic Interconnect Existing Fiber Future Fiber Existing Empty Conduit MTS Fiber Caltrans Fiber City of San Diego Fiber Port of San Diego Fiber Future Port of San Diego Fiber Future Roads Future Roadway Widening City of Chula Vista ñ City Hall 0 0.5 10.25 Miles Document Path: S:\Projects\Chula Vista\0347_Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan\04 Design\GIS\MXD Files\Chula Vista Comm MP (10.3).mxd/ 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 134 APPENDIX B EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGNAL COMMUNICATIONS ARCHITECTURE 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 135 City o f Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan Existing Traffic System Communications Network Topology 0347 EX TS Communications Architecture.vsdx4WIRE Drop Address: 22 211 La Media/Santa Venetia EIA 232 MODEMMODEM 4WIRE Drop Address: 22 211 La Media/Santa Venetia EIA 232 MODEM Drop Address: 12 165 Concord/Olympic Drop Address: 12 165 Concord/Olympic Drop Address: 11 163 Oleander/Olympic Drop Address: 11 163 Oleander/Olympic EIA 232 MODEM EIA 232 Regional Arterial Management System (RAMS) Server QuickNet Fire Wall City Router TSCC T1 District 11 TMC T R T R ISA Bus16 port Digiboard COM 101 16 port Digiboard COM 132 City Network (Frame Relay) T1 T1 City #14 City #01 T1 SINGLEMODE FIBER CABLE SCATS Server EIA 232 EIA 232 EIA 232 EIA 232 EIA 232 EIA 232 East H/South Western CollegeEIA 232EIA 232STAR CommDial Up ModemSTAR CommDial Up ModemSTAR CommDial Up ModemSTAR CommDial Up ModemDial Out Call AZTEC SM 410 STATISTICAL MULTIPLEXERAZTEC SM 410 STATISTICAL MULTIPLEXEREIA 232 Dial IN CallAuto Answer ModemAZTEC SM 410 STATISTICAL MULTIPLEXERAZTEC SM 410 STATISTICAL MULTIPLEXERSCATS 119 Auburn/ East H SCATS 173 Apache/ Miracosta/Otay Lakes SCATS Drop Address: 3 128 La Media/Otay Lakes/Tele Cyn 619 422-9591 RAMS WORKSTATION SCATS WORKSTATION 16 port Digiboard COM 121: 19 DROPS COM 127: 7 DROPS Dial IN Call COM 118: 24 DROPS COM 125: 6 DROPS COM 126: 7 DROPS Auto Answer Modem 619 426-0825 Master 10 AT&T DACS COM 101: 6 DROPS Drop Address: 20 206 Magdalena/Santa Venetia Drop Address: 1 001 Test Controller 1 Drop Address: 2 002 Test Controller 2 Drop Address: 3 003 Test Controller 3 Drop Address: 4 004 Test Controller 4 Drop Address: 5 005 Test Controller 5 Modem 4 WIRE Copper Multi-Drop LineTX RX 4WIRE 4WIRE AT&T DACSCOM 102: 5 DROPS Modem Drop Address: 3 011 E/Woodlawn Drop Address: 2 013 Broadway/D Drop Address: 4 014 Broadway/E Drop Address: 5 151 Broadway/Flower Drop Address: 1 012 Broadway/C 4 WIRE Copper Multi-Drop LineCOM 103: 8 DROPS Drop Address: 7 280 Industrial/Moss Drop Address: 8 281 Industrial/Naples Drop Address: 1 017 H/Woodlawn Drop Address: 2 030 Anita/Broadway Drop Address: 3 041 5th/Palomar Drop Address: 5 146 Date/Main/Otay Valley Drop Address: 4 254 Brandywine/Sequoia TX RX 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE Modem Drop Address: 6 023 Industrial/L AT&T DACS 4WIRE 4WIRE TX RX AT&T DACSCOM 104: 6 DROPS Modem Drop Address: 1 033 5th/E Drop Address: 2 034 5th/F Drop Address: 3 035 5th/G Drop Address: 4 036 5th/H Drop Address: 5 037 5th/I Drop Address: 6 038 5th/J 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE TX RX 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE COM 105: 6 DROPS Modem Drop Address: 4 024 Broadway/Mos s Drop Address: 5 025 Broadway/Naples Drop Address: 6 026 Broadway/Oxford Drop Address: 1 039 5th/K Drop Address: 2 040 5th/L Drop Address: 3 192 1st/Palomar Drop Address: 4 024 Broadway/Mos s Drop Address: 5 025 Broadway/Naples Drop Address: 6 026 Broadway/Oxford Drop Address: 1 039 5th/K Drop Address: 2 040 5th/L Drop Address: 3 192 1st/Palomar AT&T DACS TX RX COM 106: 5 DROPS Modem Drop Address: 5 032 Orange/Palomar AT&T DACS 4 WIRE Copper Multi-Drop Line Drop Address: 3 029 Broadway/Palomar 4WIRE Drop Address: 1 027 Industrial/Palomar Drop Address: 4 028 Palomar/Trolley Station Drop Address: 6 136 Palomar/Trolley Center 4 WIRE SELF - HEALING FIBER RING 1 Drop Address: 3 042 4 th/C Drop Address: 2 043 4th/D Drop Address: 4 045 4 th/F Drop Address: 5 149 4 th/Brisbane T R EIA 232 T R T R EIA 232 T R T R EIA 232 T R T R T R T EIA 232 R T R ifs Modem ifs Modem ifs Modem ifs Modem ifs Modem 4 WIRE SELF- HEALING FIBER RING 2T R EIA 232 T R T R EIA 232 T R T R T R T EIA 232 R T R EIA 232 T R T R EIA 232 T R T R EIA 232 T R T R EIA 232 T R T R EIA 232 T R T R EIA 232 T R T R EIA 232 T R T R EIA 232 T R T R EIA 232 T R T R EIA 232 T R T R EIA 232 T R T R VILINK ModemVILINK Modem VILINK ModemVILINK Modem VILINK ModemVILINK Modem VILINK ModemVILINK Modem VILINK ModemVILINK Modem VILINK ModemVILINK Modem VILINK ModemVILINK Modem VILINK ModemVILINK Modem VILINK ModemVILINK ModemVILINK ModemVILINK Modem VILINK ModemVILINK Modem VILINK ModemVILINK ModemVILINK ModemVILINK ModemVILINK ModemVILINK Modem VILINK Modem VILINK Modem Drop Address: 3 044 4 th/E Drop Address: 5 046 4th /G Drop Address: 6 047 4 th/H Drop Address: 1 048 4th /I Drop Address: 2 049 4 th/J Drop Address: 4 050 4 th/K Drop Address: 7 052 4 th/Mos s Drop Address: 8 053 4 th/Naples Drop Address: 9 054 4 th/Oxford Drop Address: 10 064 3rd/H Drop Address: 11 079 2nd/H Drop Address: 12 082 1st/H Drop Address: 13 084 H/Hilltop Drop Address: 14 093 Eas t H/Hidden Vista 4 WIRE SELF- HEALING FIBER RING 3T R EIA 232 T R T R EIA 232 T R T R T R T EIA 232 R T R EIA 232 T R T R EIA 232 T R T R EIA 232 T R T R VILINK ModemVILINK Modem VILINK ModemVILINK Modem VILINK ModemVILINK Modem VILINK ModemVILINK Modem VILINK ModemVILINK Modem VILINK ModemVILINK Modem VILINK Modem VILINK Modem Drop Address: 6 031 Broadway/Main Drop Address: 7 051 4th/L Drop Address: 2 055 4th/Palomar Drop Address: 3 056 4th/Orange Drop Address: 4 057 4th/Anita Drop Address: 5 058 4th/Main Master 50 EIA 232 Drop Address: 8 279 Montgomery XING MSUMSU Wireless SERIAL ENCOM5100ENCOM5100COM 110: 6 DROPS Modem AT&T DACS 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE Drop Address: 1 060 3rd/E Drop Address: 2 061 3rd/Davidson Drop Address: 3 062 3rd/F Drop Address: 5 078 2nd/F Drop Address: 6 081 1st/E COM 111: 3 DROPS Modem Drop Address: 1 063 3rd/G Drop Address: 5 085 Hilltop/I Drop Address: 6 086 Hilltop/J AT&T DACS 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE COM 112: 5 DROPS Modem 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE Drop Address: 2 065 3rd/I Drop Address: 3 066 3rd/J Drop Address: 4 067 3rd/K Drop Address: 5 080 2nd/L Drop Address: 6 083 1st/L AT&T DACS RADIORADIORADIORADIOWireless SERIAL ENCOM5200ENCOM5200Wireless SERIAL ENCOM5200ENCOM5200EIA 232EIA 232EIA 232 COM 113: 7 DROPS Modem Drop Address: 1 068 3rd/L Drop Address: 2 069 3rd/Moss Drop Address: 4 071 3rd/Oxford Drop Address: 5 088 Hilltop/Naples Drop Address: 6 089 Hilltop/Palomar AT&T DACS EIA 232 Drop Address: 3 070 3rd/Naples Drop Address: 7 260 Hilltop/Oxford EIA 232 COM 114: 7 DROPS Modem Drop Address: 3 074 3rd/Orange Drop Address: 4 075 3rd/Montgomery Drop Address: 8 219 2nd/Quintard AT&T DACS EIA 232 Wireless SERIAL ENCOM5100ENCOM5100Wireless SERIAL ENCOM5100ENCOM5100Drop Address: 1 072 3rd/Palomar Drop Address: 2 073 3rd/Quintard Drop Address: 1 072 3rd/Palomar Drop Address: 2 073 3rd/Quintard 4 WIRE Copper Multi-Drop Line Drop Address: 6 059 4th/Beyer Drop Address: 5 076 3rd/Main COM 115: 5 DROPS Modem 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE Drop Address: 1 087 Hilltop/L Drop Address: 2 092 Cuyamaca/East L Drop Address: 3 095 Eas t L/Nacion/Telegraph Cyn Drop Address: 5 108 Eas t L/Monserate Drop Address: 4 159 Eas t H/Eastlake Dr 4 WIRE Copper Multi-Drop Line COM 116: 9 DROPS Modem Drop Address: 1 154 Albany/Main Drop Address: 6 193 Eas t J/Paseo Del Rey Drop Address: 2 099 Bonita/Willow Drop Address: 3 100 Allen School/Bonita Drop Address: 4 101 Bonita/Otay Lakes Drop Address: 5 102 Allen School/Otay Lakes Drop Address: 12 109 Eas t Orange/ Max Drop Address: 13 110 Main/ Melrose 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE AT&T DACS Drop Address: 9 197 Billy Casper/Bonita Drop Address: 9 197 Billy Casper/Bonita COM 117: 10 DROPS Modem AT&T DACS Drop Address: 7 168 Mace/Main Drop Address: 8 278 Albany/Orange Drop Address: 1 090 Hilltop/Orange Drop Address: 2 091 Hilltop/Main Drop Address: 3 094 Eas t Orange/ Melrose Drop Address: 4 103 2nd/Palomar Drop Address: 5 104 2nd/Orange Drop Address: 6 105 Hilltop/Quintard Drop Address: 9 286 Eas t palomar/Nacion Drop Address: 10 287 Eas t Palomar/Raven 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE Drop Address: 1 106 Bonita/E/Flower Drop Address: 3 107 Bonita/Bonita Glen Drop Address: 4 143 Bonita/Lynwood/Plaza Bonita AT&T DACS Modem 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE Drop Address: 16 266 Eas t H/SR125 SB Drop Address: 17 267 Eas t H/SR125 NB Drop Address: 9 198 Eas t H/Miguel/Proctor Valley 4WIRE Drop Address: 10 227 Mt Miguel/Proctor Valley (N) Drop Address: 11 225 Calle La Marina/Mt Miguel Drop Address: 12 226 Mt Miguel/Paseo Veracruz Drop Address: 14 263 S Miguel Ranch/ SR125 SB Drop Address: 15 264 S Miguel Ranch/ SR125 NB Drop Address: 13 224 Ave Belterra/Mt Miguel Drop Address: 13 224 Ave Belterra/Mt Miguel Drop Address: 18 247 Ave Loretta/San Miguel Ranch Drop Address: 18 247 Ave Loretta/San Miguel Ranch Drop Address: 19 248 Ave Altamira/San Miguel Ranch Drop Address: 19 248 Ave Altamira/San Miguel Ranch Drop Address: 5 241 Proctor Valley/Rocking Horse Drop Address: 5 241 Proctor Valley/Rocking Horse Drop Address: 6 240 Lane/Proctor Valley Drop Address: 6 240 Lane/Proctor Valley Drop Address: 7 239 Hunte/Proctor Valley Drop Address: 7 239 Hunte/Proctor Valley Drop Address: 8 242 Duncan Ranch/Proctor Valley Drop Address: 8 242 Duncan Ranch/Proctor Valley Drop Address: 2 250 Proctor Valley/SM Ranch Shops Drop Address: 2 250 Proctor Valley/SM Ranch Shops COM 122: 23 DROPS Drop Address: 11 235 Birch/La Media Drop Address: 22 238 Eas tlake/Hunte Drop Address: 6 283 Strata/Orion Drop Address: 25 284 Eas tlake/Strata Drop Address: 10 236 Birch/Magdalena Drop Address: 7 262 Birch/SR125 NB Drop Address: 8 261 Birch/SR125 SB Drop Address: 8 261 Birch/SR125 SB Drop Address: 9 251 Birch/Mater Dei Drop Address: 9 251 Birch/Mater Dei Drop Address: 5 282 Artisan/Orion Drop Address: 26 285 Artisan/Millenia Drop Address: 27 288 Millenia/Stylus Drop Address: 21 259 Crossroad/Eastlake Drop Address: 14 243 Magdalena/Santa Luna Drop Address: 4 207 Eas tlake/Kestrel FallsAT&T DACS Modem 4WIRE Drop Address: 12 245 Magdalena/Wolf Canyon Drop Address: 13 244 Magdalena/Peabody 4 WIRE Copper Multi-Drop Line 4 WIRE Copper Multi-Drop Line Drop Address: 1 233 Birch/Eastlake Drop Address: 3 256 Birch/Millenia Drop Address: 2 257 Birch/Orion 4WIRE Drop Address: 16 265 Eas tlake/Stylus Drop Address: 28 222 Hidden/Hunte Drop Address: 28 222 Hidden/Hunte Drop Address: 24 252 Exploration Falls/Hunte Drop Address: 24 252 Exploration Falls/Hunte Drop Address: 23 237 Discovery Falls/Hunte Drop Address: 23 237 Discovery Falls/Hunte Drop Address: 6 142 5th/C Modem AT&T DACS 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE4WIRE Drop Address: 1 125 Hollister/Industrial/Main Drop Address: 1 125 Hollister/Industrial/Main Drop Address: 9 124 Anita/Industrial Drop Address: 9 124 Anita/Industrial Drop Address: 2 126 3rd/Anita Drop Address: 3 127 Eas t Orange/ Loma Drop Address: 3 127 Eas t Orange/ Loma Drop Address: 7 228 Bonita Vista MS/ Otay Lakes Drop Address: 7 228 Bonita Vista MS/ Otay Lakes COM 107: 4 DROPS COM 108: 14 DROPS COM 109: 7 DROPS Drop Address: 9 161 Eas t Palomar/Heritage 4 WIRE Copper Multi-Drop Line Modem Drop Address: 2 097 Elks/Paseo Del Rey/Tele Cyn Drop Address: 5 141 Paseo Ladera/Telegraph Cyn AT&T DACS Drop Address: 1 096 Crest/Oleander/Telegraph Cyn Drop Address: 3 156 Canyon Plaza/Telegraph Cyn Drop Address: 3 156 Canyon Plaza/Telegraph Cyn Drop Address: 4 098 Medical Center/Telegraph Cyn 4WIRE Drop Address: 8 170 Medical Center/Wildauer Drop Address: 10 162 Brandywine/Olympic Drop Address: 7 169 Eas t Naples/Medical Center Drop Address: 23 218 Davies /East Palomar Drop Address: 23 218 Davies /East Palomar Drop Address: 16 144 Paseo Ranchero/Telegraph Cyn Drop Address: 16 144 Paseo Ranchero/Telegraph Cyn Drop Address: 18 171 Heritage/Olympic Drop Address: 18 171 Heritage/Olympic Drop Address: 13 189 High School/Olympic Drop Address: 19 190 Olympic/Santa Venetia Drop Address: 20 172 E Palomar/Heritage Ped Xwalk Drop Address: 20 172 E Palomar/Heritage Ped Xwalk Drop Address: 21 183 Eas t Palomar/Santa Andrea Drop Address: 21 183 Eas t Palomar/Santa Andrea Drop Address: 22 182 Eas t Palomar/Santa Rita Drop Address: 22 182 Eas t Palomar/Santa Rita Drop Address: 17 147 Buena Vis ta/Telegraph Cyn Drop Address: 17 147 Buena Vis ta/Telegraph Cyn Drop Address: 15 153 Eas t J/Paseo Ranchero 4WIRE Drop Address: 14 174 Brandywine/East Palomar COM 123: 7 DROPS Modem AT&T DACS 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE Drop Address: 5 020 Broadway/J Drop Address: 6 021 Broadway/K Drop Address: 2 015 Broadway/F Drop Address: 3 016 Broadway/G Drop Address: 1 018 Broadway/H Drop Address: 4 019 Broadway/I 4WIRE Drop Address: 7 022 Broadway/L COM 116 COM 117 COM 124: 27 DROPS 4 WIRE Copper Multi-Drop Line AT&T DACS Modem Drop Address: 16 179 Eas t Palomar/Santa Rosa Drop Address: 17 253 Greensgate/Greensview Drop Address: 9 152 Eas t Palomar/La Media Drop Address: 7 160 Eas tlake/Greensgate Drop Address: 11 175 La Media/Olympic Drop Address: 12 176 Eas t Palomar/Olympic Drop Address: 12 176 Eas t Palomar/Olympic Drop Address: 14 178 Eas t Palomar/Santa Cora Drop Address: 1 123 Eas tlake Parkway/Otay Lakes 4 WIRE Copper Multi-Drop Line Drop Address: 4 145 Otay Lakes/Village Center Eas t Drop Address: 4 145 Otay Lakes/Village Center Eas t Drop Address: 8 148 Otay Lakes/Rutgers Drop Address: 8 148 Otay Lakes/Rutgers Drop Address: 30 271 Otay Lakes/SR125 NB Drop Address: 30 271 Otay Lakes/SR125 NB Drop Address: 29 270 Otay Lakes/SR125 SB Drop Address: 29 270 Otay Lakes/SR125 SB Drop Address: 27 220 Otay Lakes/Village Ctr West Drop Address: 3 134 Otay Lakes/St Claire 4WIRE Drop Address: 1 111 Eas t H/Paseo Del Rey Drop Address: 2 129 Paseo Del Rey/Plaza Drop Address: 3 130 Eas t H/Tierra Del Rey Drop Address: 4 131 Costco/Tierra Del Rey Drop Address: 5 132 Eas t H/K Mart Drop Address: 6 133 Del Rey/East H Drop Address: 8 140 Eas t H/Terra Nova AT&T DACS Modem 4WIRE 4 WIRE Copper Multi-Drop Line AT&T DACS Modem 4WIRE 4 WIRE Copper Multi-Drop Line Drop Address: 2 138 Oleander/Main Drop Address: 1 137 Brandywine/Main Drop Address: 1 137 Brandywine/Main Drop Address: 7 139 Nirvana/Main Drop Address: 7 139 Nirvana/Main Drop Address: 5 230 Main/ Main Court Drop Address: 5 230 Main/ Main Court Drop Address: 4 167 Main/ Maxwell Drop Address: 4 167 Main/ Maxwell Drop Address: 3 229 Auto Park Place/Main Drop Address: 3 229 Auto Park Place/Main Drop Address: 6 246 Auto Park Ave/Main Drop Address: 6 246 Auto Park Ave/Main 4 WIRE Copper Multi-Drop Line AT&T DACSCOM 128: 20 DROPS Modem Drop Address: 16 196 Evening Star/Hunte Drop Address: 7 200 Exploration Falls/Olympic Drop Address: 4 202 Eas tlake/Corte Vista Drop Address: 1 205 Clubhouse/Greensview Drop Address: 10 234 Hunte/So Greensview Drop Address: 11 268 Olympic/SR125 SB Drop Address: 12 269 Olympic/SR125 NB Drop Address: 2 177 Clubhouse/Eastlake Drop Address: 6 185 Eas tlake/Olympic Drop Address: 3 186 Eas tlake/Trinidad Cove Drop Address: 9 201 Olympic/Town Center Drop Address: 9 201 Olympic/Town Center Drop Address: 5 203 Eas tlake/Caminito Positano Drop Address: 8 204 Olympic/Windingwalk Drop Address: 8 204 Olympic/Windingwalk Drop Address: 13 181 Hunte/Olympic Drop Address: 28 209 Olympic/Wueste Drop Address: 28 209 Olympic/Wueste Drop Address: 26 194 Olympic/Olympic Vista Drop Address: 26 194 Olympic/Olympic Vista Drop Address: 27 215 Olympic/Olympic Training Ctr Drop Address: 27 215 Olympic/Olympic Training Ctr Drop Address: 32 258 Olympic/Viento Estrella Drop Address: 32 258 Olympic/Viento Estrella Drop Address: 31 214 Lake Crest/Wueste Drop Address: 31 214 Lake Crest/Wueste 4WIRE 4WIRE 4 WIRE Copper Multi-Drop Line COM 132 COM 119 COM 129COM 130COM 131 AT&T DACS Modem AT&T DACS Modem 4WIRE Modem AT&T DACS Modem 4WIRE Modem AT&T DACS Modem 4WIRE ModemModem ModemModem ModemModem ModemModem ModemModem ModemModem ModemModem SCATS 113 Eas t H/Paseo Ranchero SCATS 114 Buena Vis ta/East H SCATS 115 Eas t H/Southwestern College SCATS 116 Canyon/Otay Lakes/Ridgeback SCATS 117 Bonita Vista HS/Otay Lakes SCATS 118 Eas t H/Otay Lakes SCATS 150 Bonita Vista HS/Eas t H 4 WIRE AT&T Point -To-Point Line 4 WIRE AT&T Point-To-Point Line 4 WIRE AT&T Point -To-Point Line 4 WIRE AT&T Point-To-Point Line 4 WIRE AT&T Point-To-Point Line 4 WIRE AT&T Point-To-Point Line 4 WIRE AT&T Point-To-Point Line EIA 232 MODEM EIA 232 MODEMMODEM MODEMMODEM EIA 232MODEMMODEM EIA 232MODEMMODEM EIA 232MODEMMODEM 4 WIRE Copper Line MODEMMODEMEIA 232 4 WIRE Copper Line COM 120: 7 DROPS Modem AT&T DACS Drop Address: 6 213 5th/Moss Drop Address: 8 217 5th/Naples Drop Address: 3 121 Hilltop/PedCros swalk Drop Address: 4 112 Avenida Del Rey/Otay Lakes Drop Address: 5 122 Cerro Grande/Otay Lakes Drop Address: 2 120 Corral Canyon/East H/Rutgers Drop Address: 7 216 Eas t Naples/Oleander 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE COM 120: 7 DROPS Modem AT&T DACS Drop Address: 6 213 5th/Moss Drop Address: 8 217 5th/Naples Drop Address: 3 121 Hilltop/PedCros swalk Drop Address: 4 112 Avenida Del Rey/Otay Lakes Drop Address: 5 122 Cerro Grande/Otay Lakes Drop Address: 2 120 Corral Canyon/East H/Rutgers Drop Address: 7 216 Eas t Naples/Oleander 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE 4WIRE Drop Address: 6 166 Eas t Palomar/Paseo Ladera Drop Address: 24 199 Brashear/East Palomar Drop Address: 14 273 Eas t Palomar/Mid -B Ped Xing Drop Address: 14 273 Eas t Palomar/Mid -B Ped Xing EIA 232 MODEMMODEM MODEMMODEM EIA 232 Drop Address: 20 195 Elementray School/Hunte Drop Address: 28 221 Eas tlake/Miller Drop Address: 5 157 Lane/Otay Lakes Drop Address: 25 188 Eas tlake/Fenton Drop Address: 32 223 Fenton/Lane Drop Address: 31 208 Fenton/Otay Lakes Drop Address: 6 158 Hunte/Otay Lakes Drop Address: 21 184 Hunte/Stone Gate Drop Address: 24 187 Otay Lakes/Woods Drop Address: 10 164 Hunte/Greensview/King Creek Drop Address: 2 155 Clubhouse/Hunte Drop Address: 13 191 Lake Crest/Otay Lakes EIA 232 MODEMMODEM EIA 232MODEMMODEM EIA 232 MODEMMODEM EIA 232 MODEMMODEM Drop Address: 4 077 2nd/E Modem AT&T DACS Modem SCATS Drop Address: 1 135 Gotham/Otay Lakes Drop Address: 2 255 Elmhurst/Otay Lakes 4WIRE EIA 232 MODEMMODEM 4 WIRE Copper Point-To-Point Line 272 SIGNALS : 260 RAMS SIGNALS + 12 SCATS SIGNALS (5) Test Controllers (24) City-Owned Fiber Optic Lines (91) Leased Copper Lines (123) City -Owned Copper Lines to Leased Copper Lines (12) SCATS Signals (4) Wireless Signals (11) Offline – No Infrastructure (2) Offline – Leased Telephone Drop RepairOFFLINE SIGNALOFFLINE SIGNAL OFFLINE SIGNALOFFLINE SIGNALRADIORADIO RADIORADIORADIORADIOSMFOC SIGNALSMFOC SIGNAL LEASED LINE SIGNALLEASED LINE SIGNAL CITY COPPER SIGNALCITY COPPER SIGNAL SCATS SIGNALSCATS SIGNAL TEST CONTROLLERTEST CONTROLLER 272 SIGNALS : 260 RAMS SIGNALS + 12 SCATS SIGNALS (5) Test Controllers (24) City-Owned Fiber Optic Lines (91) Leased Copper Lines (123) City -Owned Copper Lines to Leased Copper Lines (12) SCATS Signals (4) Wireless Signals (11) Offline – No Infrastructure (2) Offline – Leased Telephone Drop RepairOFFLINE SIGNAL OFFLINE SIGNALRADIO RADIOSMFOC SIGNAL LEASED LINE SIGNAL CITY COPPER SIGNAL SCATS SIGNAL TEST CONTROLLER 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 136 APPENDIX C FUTURE TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS & TRAFFIC SIGNALS 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 137 PROJECT NAME PROJECT DESCRIPTION SOURCE E STREET WIDENING WIDEN E STREET BETWEEN WOODLAWN AND I‐5 TO ADD A WESTBOUND RIGHT‐TURN LANE AT THE I‐5 NB RAMP, IMPROVE OPERATIONS AT THE I‐5 NB RAMP, AND REDUCE QUEUES IN THE WESTBOUND DIRECTION. URBAN CORE SPECIFIC PLAN H STREET WIDENING WIDEN H STREET BETWEEN THIRD AVENUE AND BROADWAY BY 8 FEET FOR A NEW SEGMENT CONFIGURATION AND BUILDOUT TRAFFIC. URBAN CORE SPECIFIC PLAN BROADWAY WIDENING WIDEN BROADWAY BETWEEN E STREET AND F STREET BY 14 FEET FOR A CONSISTENT ROADWAY SEGMENT CONFIGURATION. URBAN CORE SPECIFIC PLAN WILLOW STREET BRIDGE WIDENING REPLACE AND WIDEN BRIDGE INCLUDING SHOULDERS. SANDAG 2050 RTP, TABLE A.8 ‐ PHASED ARTERIAL PROJECTS ‐ REVENUE CONSTRAINED PLAN NORTH FOURTH AVENUE AND BRISBANE STREET WIDENING ADD ADDITIONAL TRAVEL LANE ON THE EAST SIDE OF FOURTH AVE. SANDAG 2050 RTP, TABLE A.8 ‐ PHASED ARTERIAL PROJECTS ‐ REVENUE CONSTRAINED PLAN Future Road Widening 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 138 INTERCONNECT PROJECT DESCRIPTION SOURCE COPPER INSTALL NEW COPPER BASED WIRE INTERCONNECT TO CLOSE THE COMMUNICATIONS GAP BETWEEN EAST H STREET/ TIERRA DEL REY AND EAST H STREET/ PASEO RANCHERO. ATCS EXPANSION PROJECT FIBER IN COOPERATION WITH MTS, NEW CITY‐OWNED CONDUIT AND SINGLEMODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE WILL BE INSTALLED ALONG PORTIONS OF THE I‐805, EAST PALOMAR STREET, EASTLAKE PARKWAY, BIRCH ROAD, AND THE SR‐125. SOUTH BAY RAPID PROJECT FIBER IN COOPERATION WITH MTS, NEW CONDUIT AND FIBER WILL BE INSTALLED ALONG MAIN STREET FROM INDUSTRIAL BOULEVARD TO SR‐125. A CITY‐ OWNED INNERDUCT AND DEDICATED FIBER WILL BE INCLUDED. MAIN STREET FIBER OPTIC PROJECT FIBER IN COOPERATION WITH A PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT IN THE RANCHO DEL REY AREA, NEW CONDUIT XXX SINGLEMODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE WILL BE INSTALLED ALONG PORTIONS OF NORTH RANCHO DEL REY PARKWAY, SOUTH RANCHO DEL REY PARKWAY, RIDGEBACK ROAD, OTAY LAKES ROAD, EAST H STREET, AND CORRAL CANYON ROAD. CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF WIRELESS INSTALL WIRELESS RADIO COMMUNICATIONS FROM INDUSTRIAL BOULEVARD AND L STREET (EXISTING TELEPHONE DROP SIGNAL) TO INDUSTRIAL BOULEVARD AND NAPLES STREET CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF WIRELESS INSTALL WIRELESS RADIO COMMUNICATIONS FROM FOURTH AVENUE AND L STREET (EXISTING FIBER SIGNAL) TO HILLTOP DRIVE AND L STREET CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF WIRELESS INSTALL WIRELESS RADIO COMMUNICATIONS FROM THIRD AVENUE AND H STREET (EXISTING FIBER SIGNAL) TO THIRD AVENUE AND I STREET CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF Future Traffic Communications Interconnect 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 139 TRAFFIC SIGNAL LOCATION SOURCE MAIN ST/HERITAGE RD VILLAGE 3 SPA HERITAGE RD/SANTA MACHETO VILLAGE 3 SPA HERITAGE RD/SANTA PICACHO VILLAGE 3 SPA HERITAGE RD/SANTA MAYA VILLAGE 3 SPA HERITAGE RD/ENERGY WAY VILLAGE 3 SPA MAIN ST/QUARRY ACCESS RD VILLAGE 3 SPA MAIN ST/PRIVATE RD VILLAGE 3 SPA MAIN ST/SANTA MARISOL VILLAGE 8E SPA OTAY VALLEY RD/SANTA MARISOL VILLAGE 8E SPA DISCOVERY FALLS DR/SANTA DAVIS VILLAGE 10 SPA DISCOVERY FALLS/UNIVERSITY DR VILLAGE 10 SPA DISCOVERY FALLS DR/SANTA JULIARD VILLAGE 10 SPA DISCOVERY FALLS DR/STREET 'B'VILLAGE 10 SPA OTAY VALLEY RD/MAIN ST CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF LA MEDIA RD SB/MAIN ST WB VILLAGE 8W SPA LA MEDIA RD SB/MAIN ST EB VILLAGE 8W SPA LA MEDIA RD NB/MAIN ST EB VILLAGE 8W SPA STREET 'A'/MAIN ST WB VILLAGE 8W SPA OTAY VALLEY RD/STREET 'C'VILLAGE 8W SPA STREET 'A'/MAIN ST EB VILLAGE 8W SPA OTAY VALLEY RD/STREET 'A'VILLAGE 9 SPA, VILLAGE 8W SPA STREET 'A'/STREET 'B'VILLAGE 8W SPA LA MEDIA RD NB/MAIN ST WB VILLAGE 8W SPA MILLENIA AVE/HUNTE PKWY VILLAGE 9 SPA HUNTE PKWY/ORION AVE VILLAGE 9 SPA STREET "C"& STREET "F"/STREET "A"VILLAGE 9 SPA STREET "C"/STREET "B"VILLAGE 9 SPA STREET "E"/STREET "B"CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF STREET "E"/STREET "A" NB VILLAGE 9 SPA STREET "E"/STREET "A" SB VILLAGE 9 SPA CAMPUS BLVD/STREET "B"VILLAGE 9 SPA CAMPUS BLVD/STREET "A" NB VILLAGE 9 SPA CAMPUS BLVD/STREET "A" SB VILLAGE 9 SPA STREET "I"/STREET "A" NB VILLAGE 9 SPA STREET "I"/STREET "A" SB VILLAGE 9 SPA OTAY VALLEY RD/STREET "A"VILLAGE 9 SPA OTAY VALLEY RD/STREET "I"VILLAGE 9 SPA E PALOMAR/MEDICAL CENTER CT CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF E PALOMAR/SANTA OLIVA/SANTA CARINA CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF E PALOMAR/SANTA MARIA/SANTA SIERRA CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF E PALOMAR/SANTA ALICIA CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF E PALOMAR/SANTA FLORA CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF E PALOMAR/SANTA DELPHINA CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF E PALOMAR/VISTA SONRISA CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF Future Traffic Signals 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 140 TRAFFIC SIGNAL LOCATION SOURCE E PALOMAR ST/OLEANDER AV CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF E PALOMAR ST/SHOPPING CTR CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF OLYMPIC PW/FUTURE RD CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF OLYMPIC PW/FUTURE RD CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF OLYMPIC PW/FUTURE RD CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF MAIN ST CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF MAIN ST/MAGDALENA AV CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF MAIN ST/SANTA TIPO CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF SANTA VENETIA ST/SANTA VICTORIA RD CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF TOWN CENTER DR/FUTURE RD CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF TOWN CENTER DR/FUTURE RD CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF SR‐125 NB/FUTURE RD CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF EASTLAKE PW/ENTRANCE CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF MILLENIA AVE/FIRE STATION SIGNAL CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF BOB PLETCHER WY/MILLENIA AVE CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF MILLENIA AVE/FUTURE INTERSECTION CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF K STREET/MILLENIA AVE CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF AVANT ST/MILLENIA AVE CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF K STREET/MONTACE CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF HUNTE PW/MONTACE CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF AVANT ST/BRT CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF J ST/BRT CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF H ST/BRT CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF G ST/C ST CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF AGUA VISTA DR & PROCTOR VALLEY RD CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF PROCTOR VALLEY RD & COASTAL HILLS CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF E PALOMAR ST&VIEW PARK WY CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF E PALOMAR ST&MAGDALENA AV CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF E PALOMAR ST&VISTA SONRISA CROSSWALK CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF LA MEDIA RD&SANTA LUNA ST CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF PASEO MAGDA&PASEO RANCHERO CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF SANTA CHRISTINA AV&SANTA VICTORIA RD CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF STATE ST&RETAIL DR CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF SANTA ALEXIA AV&SANTA VICTORIA RD CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF HERITAGE RD &SANTA VICTORIA RD CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF ORION AV&NORTHERLY DRIVEWAY CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF BRT GUIDEWAY & SOLSTICE AV CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF SANTA CHRISTINA AV&SANTA VICTORIA RD CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF BRT GUIDEWAY & CROSSWALK AT EASTLAKE PW CITY OF CHULA VISTA STAFF J ST & BAY BLVD BAYFRONT MASTER PLAN L ST & BAY BLVD BAYFRONT MASTER PLAN BAY BLVD & I‐5 SB BAYFRONT MASTER PLAN H ST & STREET "A"BAYFRONT MASTER PLAN J ST & MARINA PKWY BAYFRONT MASTER PLAN J ST & STREET "A"BAYFRONT MASTER PLAN H ST & MARINA PW BAYFRONT MASTER PLAN 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 141 TRAFFIC SIGNAL LOCATION SOURCE DEL MONTE AVE & MAIN ST MAIN STREET STREETSCAPE MASTER PLAN BANNER AVE & MAIN ST MAIN STREET STREETSCAPE MASTER PLAN OTAY VALLEY RD/MAPLE DR & MAIN ST MAIN STREET STREETSCAPE MASTER PLAN JACQUA ST & MAIN ST MAIN STREET STREETSCAPE MASTER PLAN 7TH ST & MAIN ST MAIN STREET STREETSCAPE MASTER PLAN FRESNO AVE & MAIN ST MAIN STREET STREETSCAPE MASTER PLAN 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 142 APPENDIX D FUTURE TRAFFIC SIGNAL COMMUNICATIONS ARCHITECTURE 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 143 Layer 3 Ethernet RouterNODE TSCC -1 T R Optical Ports Layer 3 Ethernet Router SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #4 Optical Ports Optical Ports Layer 3 Ethernet Router Optical Ports R T R T Optical Ports Layer 3 Ethernet Router T R Optical Ports Layer 3 Ethernet RouterNODE TSCC -2 T R T R T R T R CHULA VISTA TSCC & TMC SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #2 SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #6SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #5DMS DMS Controller Transit & Emergency Vehicle Signal Priority Transit & Emergency Vehicle Signal Priority Transit & Emergency Vehicle Signal Priority Solar Panel MVDS RS232 RS485 Click 200 Click 200 Remote Wireless Radio (802.11ac) Master Wireless Radio (802.11ac)MVDSRS232 RS485 Click 200 Click 200 MVDS Cabinet Remote Wireless Radio (802.11ac) IP Camera ATC CMCM CTLR Cabinet IP Camera ATC RR TT TT RR CMCM IP Camera ATC RR TT TT RR CMCM IP Camera ATC RR TT TT RR CMCM R T R T IP Camera ATC RR TT TT RR CMCM T R T R SFP Module Layer 2 Ethernet Switch R T R T 1 Gbps Fiber Port VDSL Copper port 10/100/1000 Mbps Copper Port CMCM Conflict Monitor CAT 5 cable Single Mode Fiber Optic Cable EXISTING COPPER WIRE LINE pair LEGEND OWNED WIRELESS LINK CELLULAR WIRELESS LINK TRAVEL TIME IP Camera ATC CMCM T R T R R T R T IP Camera ATC CMCM T R T R R T R T SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE IP Camera ATC CMCM T R T R T R T R IP Camera ATC CMCM T R T R R T R T IP Camera ATC CMCM T R T R R T R T IP Camera ATC CMCM T R T R R T R T 6 MINUTES TO MAIN ST DMS Controller Transit & Emergency Vehicle Signal Priority Transit & Emergency Vehicle Signal Priority Transit & Emergency Vehicle Signal Priority T R T R 4TH AVE & NAPLES ST IP CameraRRTT TT RR CMCM IP CameraRRTT TT RR CMCM IP CameraRRTT TT RR CMCM IP CameraRRTT TT RR CMCM IP CameraRRTT TT RR CMCM IP CameraRRTT TT RR CMCM IP CameraRRTT TT RR CMCM IP CameraRRTT TT RR CMCM IP CameraRRTT TT RR CMCM IP CameraRRTT TT RR CMCM IP CameraRRTT TT RR CMCM SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #5Master Wireless Radio (802.11ac) Remote Wireless Radio (802.11ac) OWNED WIRELESS LINK GAP IP Camera CMCM BROADWAY & NAPLES ST IP Camera CMCM IP Camera ATC CMCM IP Camera ATC CMCM IP Camera CMCM IP Camera ATC CMCM IP Camera CMCM IP Camera CMCM IP Camera CMCM BROADWAY & D ST Master Wireless Radio (802.11ac) OWNED WIRELESS LINK GAP EXISTING CITY OWNED COPPER WIRE LINEEXISTING CITY OWNED COPPER WIRE LINESINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #4 TRAVEL TIME IP Camera ATC CMCM T R T R R T R T IP Camera ATC CMCM T R T R R T R T SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE IP Camera ATC CMCM T R T R R T R T IP Camera ATC CMCM T R T R R T R T IP Camera ATC CMCM T R T R R T R T IP Camera ATC CMCM T R T R R T R T 6 MINUTES TO MAIN ST DMS Controller Transit & Emergency Vehicle Signal Priority Transit & Emergency Vehicle Signal Priority Transit & Emergency Vehicle Signal Priority TRAVEL TIME IP Camera CMCM T R T R R T R T IP Camera CMCM T R T R R T R T IP Camera CMCM T R T R TIP Camera CMCM T R T R R T R T IP Camera CMCM T R T R R T R T IP Camera CMCM T R T R R T R T 6 MINUTES TO HERITAGE RD DMS Controller Transit & Emergency Vehicle Signal Priority Fire Wall IoT Router Transit & Emergency Vehicle Signal Priority Transit & Emergency Vehicle Signal Priority CMCMCM CMCMCM CMCMCM 5 MINUTES TO 805 DMS Controller CMCMCM CMCMCM CMCMCM Optical Ports Can be 10 Gbps, 40 Gbps, or 100 Gbps via SFP modules VIDsVIDs VIDsVIDs Regional Arterial Management System (RAMS) Server Transparity Fire Wall City Router RAMS Network Agency #01 Fiber R TRT R TRT 10 Gbps or Higher SpeedFiber PortEXISTING CITY OWNED COPPER WIRE LINEEXISTING CITY OWNED COPPER WIRE LINE R T R T ATC ATC ATC ATC ATC ATC ATC ATC ATC ATC ATC ATC ATC ATC ATC ATC ATC ATC ATC ATC ATC ATC ATC ATC ATC ATCATCATC ATC CLOUD 4G Wireless Router CMCMCM 4G Wireless Router CMCMCM 4G Wireless Router CMCMCM VIDEO WALL VIDEO WALL Controller ADAPTIVE CONTROLLER ADAPTIVE CONTROLLER ANIMAL CARE FACILITY ANIMAL CARE FACILITY STAKE HOLDERS’ DEDICATED BUFFER TUBE STAKE HOLDERS’ DEDICATED BUFFER TUBE STAKE HOLDERS’ DEDICATED BUFFER TUBE SEWER PUMP STATION SEWER PUMP STATION SEWER PUMP STATION SEWER PUMP STATION SEWER PUMP STATION SEWER PUMP STATION RECREATION CENTER RECREATION CENTER RECREATION CENTER RECREATION CENTER RECREATION CENTER RECREATION CENTERSTAKE HOLDERS’ DEDICATED BUFFER TUBER TRT VIDEO WALL VIDEO WALL Controller POLICE DEPT. HQ RR TT POLICE STATION POLICE STATION POLICE STATION POLICE STATION POLICE STATION POLICE STATION SOUTH LIBRARY CIVIC CENTER LIBRARY Network Concept version 6 - FIVE NODES.vsdx Last Edit Date: 1/13/2017 NODE 1 NODE 2 NODE 3 TRTR R T R T IP Camera ATC RR TT TT RR CMCM IP Camera ATC RR TT TT RR CMCM IP Camera ATC RR TT TT RR CMCM IP Camera ATC RR TT TT RR CMCM R TRT R T R T R T R T CMCMCM ATC T R T R T R T R SEWER PUMP STATION SEWER PUMP STATION RECREATION CENTER RECREATION CENTER STAKE HOLDERS’ DEDICATED BUFFER TUBE POLICE STATION POLICE STATION POLICE STATION TT RR 4G Wireless Router ATC CMCMCM Internet of Things (IoT) Network Over 4G Cellular System (VPN) Internet of Things (IoT) Network Over 4G Cellular System (VPN) 4G Wireless Router ATC CMCMCM 4G Wireless Router CMCMCM 4G Wireless Router #5 ATCATCATC ATC CMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCM CMCMCM 4G Wireless Router #8 ATCATC ATC CMCMCMCMCMCM CMCMCM 4G Wireless Router #6 ATCATCATC ATC CMCMCMCMCMCM CMCM 4G Wireless Router #7 ATCATCATC ATC CMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCM CMCMCM MVDSRS232 RS485 Click 200 Click 200 Remote Wireless Radio (802.11ac) MVDSRS232 RS485 Click 200 Click 200 MVDS Cabinet IP Camera Remote Wireless Radio (802.11ac) Master Wireless Radio (802.11ac) Master Wireless Radio (802.11ac) Solar Panel EXISTING CITY OWNED COPPER WIRE LINE EXISTING CITY OWNED COPPER WIRE LINE EXISTING CITY OWNED COPPER WIRE LINE EXISTING CITY OWNED COPPER WIRE LINE ATC R T R T R T R T Transit & Emergency Vehicle Signal Priority Transit & Emergency Vehicle Signal Priority ATC CMCMCM ATC CMCMCM ATC CMCMCM 25 MINUTES TO 125 DMS Controller CMCMCM CMCMCM CMCMCM VIDsVIDs EXISTING CITY OWNED COPPER WIRE LINE EXISTING CITY OWNED COPPER WIRE LINE EXISTING CITY OWNED COPPER WIRE LINE ATC ATC ATC RRR TT R TT R T T R TR T R T T R T R T R T R TRAVEL TIME = t2-t1 IP Camera ATC CMCM T R T R R T R T IP Camera ATC CMCM T R T R R T R T SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #1 IP Camera CMCM T R T R R T R T IP Camera CMCM T R T R R T R T IP Camera ATC CMCM T R T R R T R T IP Camera CMCM T R T R R T R T 6 MINUTES TO MAIN ST DMS Controller Transit & Emergency Vehicle Signal Priority Transit & Emergency Vehicle Signal Priority Transit & Emergency Vehicle Signal Priority 4TH AVE & D ST IP Camera ATC CMCM T R T R T R T R ATC ATCATC t1t2 R T R T OLYMPIC TRAINING CENTER OLYMPIC TRAINING CENTER R T R T 4G Wireles Router Fire Wall IP Camera ATC CMCM T R T R R T R T TRTR R T R T CMCMCM ATC R T R TSINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #3 T R T R SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #1SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #1 SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #1SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #1 SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #1SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #1 SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #1SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #1 SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #1SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #1 SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #2SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #2 SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #2SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #2 SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #2 SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #2SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #2 SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #3SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #3 SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #4SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #4 SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #4SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #4 T R T R COMMUNICATIONS SERVER COMMUNICATIONS SERVER SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #2 SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #6SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #6SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #6SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE #6R LMR 400 COAX CABLE FIRE TRUCK EXTERNAL ANTENNA FOR WIRELESS RADIO WIRELESS RADIO WITH BUILT -IN ANTENNA Agency #14Fiber Fiber Future Traffic System Communications Network Architecture 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 144 APPENDIX E ORDER OF MAGNITUDE COST ESTIMATES 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 145 1 - Item 1 Fiber Communications System Conversion to Ethernet STC Traffic, Inc. 7/13/2017 Item # Quantity Unit Unit Price Amount 1 25 EA $5,000.00 $125,000.00 $125,000.00 Soft Costs (25%): $31,250.00 $31,250.00 Total: $187,500.00 1 - Item 2 Leased Copper Conversion to City-Owned Broadband Wireless and Connected City-Owned Copper Conversion to Ethernet STC Traffic, Inc 7/13/2017 Item # Quantity Unit Unit Price Amount 1 39 EA $5,000.00 $195,000.00 2 82 EA $7,500.00 $615,000.00 3 82 EA $2,000.00 $164,000.00 4 146 EA $5,000.00 $730,000.00 $1,704,000.00 Soft Costs (25%): $426,000.00 $426,000.00 Total: $2,556,000.00 1 - Item 3 Leased Cellular Traffic Measurement Devices Conversion to City-Owned Broadband Wireless STC Traffic, Inc 7/13/2017 Item # Quantity Unit Unit Price Amount 1 55 EA $5,000.00 $275,000.00 2 13 EA $7,500.00 $97,500.00 $372,500.00 Soft Costs (25%): $93,125.00 $93,125.00 Total: $558,750.00 1 - Item 4 Video Monitoring at Priority Locations STC Traffic, Inc. 7/13/2017 Item # Quantity Unit Unit Price Amount 1 28 EA $8,000.00 $224,000.00 $224,000.00 Soft Costs (25%): $56,000.00 $56,000.00 Total: $336,000.00 Item Description Furnish and Install Layer 2 Ethernet Switch with 2-Dual Fiber Ports Sub Total: Construction Contingency (25%): TRAFFIC SIGNAL COMMUNICATION MASTER PLAN PHASE 1 ORDER OF MAGNITUDE COST ESTIMATE Phase: Scenario: Prepared By: Date: Item Description Furnish and Install Single Radio Furnish and Install Dual Radio Furnish and Install Sectoral Antenna for Dual Radios Phase: Scenario: Prepared By: Date: Furnish and Install Layer 2 Ethernet Switch with 2-Dual Fiber Ports Sub Total: Construction Contingency (25%): Phase: Scenario: Furnish and Install Dual Radio Sub Total: Construction Contingency (25%): Phase: Prepared By: Date: Item Description Furnish and Install Single Radio Scenario: Prepared By: Date: Item Description Furnish and Install CCTV Camera Sub Total: Construction Contingency (25%): 2017-07-07 Cost Est_Summary.xlsx2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 146 1 - Item 5 Dynamic Message Signs STC Traffic, Inc. 7/13/2017 Item # Quantity Unit Unit Price Amount 1 1 EA $150,000.00 $150,000.00 2 2 EA $20,000.00 $40,000.00 $190,000.00 Soft Costs (25%): $47,500.00 $47,500.00 Total: $285,000.00 1 - Item 6 Satellite Maintenance Facility Traffic Management Center STC Traffic, Inc. 7/13/2017 Item # Quantity Unit Unit Price Amount 1 1 EA $2,200.00 $2,200.00 2 4 EA $18,000.00 $72,000.00 $74,200.00 Soft Costs (25%): $18,550.00 $18,550.00 Total: $111,300.00 1 - Item 7 Traffic Signal Controller Ethernet Conversion Upgrade STC Traffic, Inc. 7/13/2017 Item # Quantity Unit Unit Price Amount 1 267 EA $400.00 $106,800.00 $106,800.00 Soft Costs (25%): $26,700.00 $26,700.00 Total: $160,200.00 1 - Item 8 Communications Hub Installation STC Traffic, Inc. 7/13/2017 Item # Quantity Unit Unit Price Amount 1 4 EA $100,000.00 $400,000.00 $400,000.00 Soft Costs (25%): $100,000.00 $100,000.00 Total: $600,000.00 Furnish and Install Layer 3 Communication Hub Sub Total: Construction Contingency (25%): Dynamic Message Sign - Fixed IBase Video Wall Server 46" Television Monitors with Mounts Scenario: Prepared By: Date: Item Description Item Description Furnish and Install 170E Serial to Ethernet Converter Sub Total: Construction Contingency (25%): Phase: Phase: Scenario: Prepared By: Date: Phase: Scenario: Prepared By: Date: Item Description Dynamic Message Sign - Portable Sub Total: Construction Contingency (25%): Phase: Scenario: Prepared By: Construction Contingency (25%): Date: Item Description Sub Total: 2017-07-07 Cost Est_Summary.xlsx2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 147 2 - Item 1 Existing Communications Conduit Upgrade STC Traffic, Inc. 7/13/2017 Item # Quantity Unit Unit Price Amount 1 250 LF $100.00 $25,000.00 2 5 EA $2,500.00 $12,500.00 3 5 EA $1,500.00 $7,500.00 4 170,000 LF $5.00 $850,000.00 5 500 LF $2.50 $1,250.00 6 5 EA $2,000.00 $10,000.00 7 5 EA $2,000.00 $10,000.00 $916,250.00 Soft Costs (25%): $229,062.50 $229,062.50 Total: $1,374,375.00 2 - Item 2 Wireless Radio Communications to Fiber Optic Communications Upgrade STC Traffic, Inc 7/13/2017 Item # Quantity Unit Unit Price Amount 1 45,000 LF $50.00 $2,250,000.00 2 50,000 LF $5.00 $250,000.00 3 3,400 LF $2.00 $6,800.00 4 68 EA $2,500.00 $170,000.00 5 68 LF $2,000.00 $136,000.00 6 68 EA $2,000.00 $136,000.00 7 25 EA $5,000.00 $125,000.00 $3,073,800.00 Soft Costs (25%): $768,450.00 $768,450.00 Total: $4,610,700.00 2 - Item 3 Traffic Signal Equipment Upgrade on Priority Corridors STC Traffic, Inc. 7/13/2017 Item # Quantity Unit Unit Price Amount 1 74 EA $5,000.00 $370,000.00 4 46 EA $8,000.00 $368,000.00 $738,000.00 Soft Costs (25%): $184,500.00 $184,500.00 Total: $1,107,000.00 TRAFFIC SIGNAL COMMUNICATION MASTER PLAN PHASE 2 ORDER OF MAGNITUDE COST ESTIMATE Furnish and Install Breakout SMFO Cable Item Description Furnish and Install 3" PVC Conduit Furnish and Install Fiber Optic Vault Furnish and Install Fiber Optic Pull Box Furnish and Install Trunk SMFO Cable Furnish and Install Breakout SMFO Cable Phase: Scenario: Prepared By: Date: Date: Item Description Furnish and Install 2070 Controller Assembly Furnish and Install CCTV Camera Furnish and Install Fiber Optic Vault Furnish and Install Splice Closure Phase: Scenario: Prepared By: Furnish and Install Fiber Distribution Unit Furnish and Install Layer 2 Ethernet Switch with 2-Dual Fiber Ports Sub Total: Construction Contingency (25%): Furnish and Install Fiber Distribution Unit Furnish and Install Strand Splice Closure Sub Total: Construction Contingency (25%): Item Description Phase: Scenario: Prepared By: Date: Furnish and Install 3" PVC Conduit Furnish and Install Trunk SMFO Cable Sub Total: Construction Contingency (25%): 2017-07-07 Cost Est_Summary.xlsx2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 148 3 - Item 1 Traffic Signal Equipment Upgrade at Remaining Intersections STC Traffic, Inc. 7/13/2017 Item # Quantity Unit Unit Price Amount 1 193 EA $5,000.00 $965,000.00 2 193 EA $8,000.00 $1,544,000.00 $2,509,000.00 Soft Costs (25%): $627,250.00 $627,250.00 Total: $3,763,500.00 3 - Item 2 Video Detection Equipment Upgrade STC Traffic, Inc. 7/13/2017 Item # Quantity Unit Unit Price Amount 1 155 EA $800.00 $124,000.00 $124,000.00 Soft Costs (25%): $31,000.00 $31,000.00 Total: $186,000.00 Item Description Furnish and Install 2070 Controller Assembly Furnish and Install CCTV Camera TRAFFIC SIGNAL COMMUNICATION MASTER PLAN PHASE 3 ORDER OF MAGNITUDE COST ESTIMATE Phase: Scenario: Prepared By: Date: Item Description Furnish and Install Analog to Ethernet Video Encoder Sub Total: Construction Contingency (25%): Sub Total: Construction Contingency (25%): Phase: Scenario: Prepared By: Date: 2017-07-07 Cost Est_Summary.xlsx2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 149 1 Fiber Connection to City Facilities (Police Station, Fire Station) STC Traffic, Inc. 7/13/2017 Item # Quantity Unit Unit Price Amount 1 300 LF $100.00 $30,000.00 2 3 EA $1,500.00 $4,500.00 3 2 EA $5,000.00 $10,000.00 4 700 LF $2.00 $1,400.00 5 2 EA $2,000.00 $4,000.00 6 2 EA $2,000.00 $4,000.00 $53,900.00 Soft Costs (25%): $13,475.00 $13,475.00 Total: $80,850.00 2 Fiber Connections to City Facilities (Fire Station 3, Otay Rec Center, Chula Vista Transit) STC Traffic, Inc. 7/13/2017 Item # Quantity Unit Unit Price Amount 1 2,300 LF $50.00 $115,000.00 2 14 EA $1,500.00 $21,000.00 3 3 EA $5,000.00 $15,000.00 4 3,300 LF $2.00 $6,600.00 5 3 EA $2,000.00 $6,000.00 6 3 EA $2,000.00 $6,000.00 $169,600.00 Soft Costs (25%): $42,400.00 $42,400.00 Total: $254,400.00 3 Fiber Connections to City Facilities (Fire Stations 3,4,6,7,8,9, Veterans Community Park, Montevalle Community Center) STC Traffic, Inc. 7/13/2017 Item # Quantity Unit Unit Price Amount 1 5,400 LF $50.00 $270,000.00 2 40 EA $1,500.00 $60,000.00 3 9 EA $5,000.00 $45,000.00 4 8,300 LF $2.00 $16,600.00 5 9 EA $2,000.00 $18,000.00 6 9 EA $2,000.00 $18,000.00 $427,600.00 Soft Costs (25%): $106,900.00 $106,900.00 Total: $641,400.00 Construction Contingency (25%): Furnish and Install Fiber Optic Pull Box Furnish and Install Layer 2 Ethernet Switch with 2-Dual Fiber Ports Furnish and Install 12 SMFO Cable Furnish and Install Fiber Distribution Unit Furnish and Install 96 Strand Splice Closure Sub Total: Sub Total: Construction Contingency (25%): Phase: Scenario: Prepared By: Item Description Furnish and Install 3" PVC Conduit Furnish and Install Fiber Optic Pull Box Furnish and Install 3" PVC Conduit Furnish and Install Breakout SMFO Cable Furnish and Install Fiber Distribution Unit Furnish and Install Splice Closure Date: Item Description Furnish and Install 3" PVC Conduit Furnish and Install Fiber Optic Pull Box Date: Furnish and Install Splice Closure Sub Total: TRAFFIC SIGNAL COMMUNICATION MASTER PLAN CITY FACILITIES ORDER OF MAGNITUDE COST ESTIMATE Furnish and Install Layer 2 Ethernet Switch with 2-Dual Fiber Ports Phase: Scenario: Prepared By: Date: Furnish and Install Layer 2 Ethernet Switch with 2-Dual Fiber Ports Furnish and Install Breakout SMFO Cable Furnish and Install Fiber Distribution Unit Construction Contingency (25%): Phase: Scenario: Prepared By: Item Description 2017-07-07 Cost Est_Summary.xlsx2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 150 APPENDIX F FUTURE TRAFFIC SIGNAL COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK MAP 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 151 (###) (###) (###) (###) ### ### ### ### ### # # # # # # # # ## # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # ## # # # # # # # # ## # # # ### # # # # # # #### # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # ##### # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # ## # # #### # # # ## # ## # # # # # # # # # ## ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç #Ç XY XY XY XY XY XYXY XYXY XY XY XY XY XY XY XY XY XYXY XY XY XY XY XY XYXY XY XY XY XYXYXY XY XYXYXY XY XY XY XY XYXY XYXYXY XY --¡ÇÖ*ÇÖ*ñ kj ñ$+ $+ $+ $+ !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!(³¸!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( #* #* #*#*#*#*#*#* #*#* #* #* #*#*#*#*#*#*#* #* #* #* #* #*#* #*#*#* #* #*#* 31 3131 3131 31 3131 31 31 3131 3131 3131 3131 3131 3131 3131 31 3131313131 3131 31 313131 31 3131 31 3131 3131 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 3131 3131 31 31 3131 31 31 31 3131 31 31 31 31 31 3131 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 3131 31 31 31 31 31 3131 31 3131 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 3131 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 3131 31 31 31 31 31 3131 3131 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 3131 31 31 31 31 31 3131 31 31 31 31 31 31 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$5 !"#$508 !"#$508 !"#$508 ·|}þ54·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 ·|}þ54 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 }þ125 E H ST E J ST MAIN ST04TH AVI ST OLYMPIC PYH ST03RD AV J ST E ST L ST F ST BAY BLOTAYLAKESRD HUNTEPYBROADWAYK ST E PALOMAR S THILLTOP DR D ST 01ST AV MOSS ST LAMEDI ARD PALOMAR ST05TH AV NAPLES ST TE L E GRAPH CA NYONRD ANITA ST 02ND AV E L ST E NAPLES S T ORANGE AV G ST C ST HERI T A G E R DLANEAVINDUSTR IAL BL PROCTOR VALLEY RD PA S EOLADERAB O N IT A RDCLUB H O U S E D R E I ST EORANGE A V E OXFORD S T FLOWER S T S RANCHO D E L R E Y PY N R A NCHODELREYPY PASEOD E LREYWU E STERDN 0 2 N D A VN GREEN S V IEW D R E X P L O RATIONFALLSDRCREST DRE F L O W E R S T E PALOMAR D R E H ST 05TH AV K ST02ND AVHERITAGE RDI ST 01ST AVBAY BL G ST ANITA STANITA ST 03RD AVC ST WUESTE RDMAIN KJ HERITAGEMONTACETRIBUTARYMAIN W BS T R E E T " A "SR 125 S A N T A M A R I S O L ARI OTAY VALLEY U N I V E R S I T Y STREET "E"STREET "I"STREET "D"S A N T A D A V I S S AN T A T I PO DI S C O V E R Y F A L L S SA N T A M A C H E T O CAR AW AY STREET "F"CALLE SWANS E A SOLS T ICE STREET "D"SR 125MAINSR 1 2 5 OTAY VALLEY MAIN SAN DIEGO S.D. COUNTY CORONADO NATIONAL CITY SAN DIEGO IMPERIAL BEACH S.D. COUNTY LANDFILL S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY S.D. COUNTY 255 115 117 114 116 118 173 135 150 128 (112)83(112)80 (113)68 (106)28 (114)73 (113)89 (103)41 (117)94 (117)90 (117)91 (109)31 (114)72 (113)71 (109)55 (108)54 (108)53 (105)24 (113)70 (109)58 (109)56 (106)32 (105)26 (105)25 (106)27 (123)22 (103)23 (113)69(108)52 (109)51(105)40 (108)79 (103)17 (108)49 (108)50(105)39 (104)38(123)20 (110)81 (108)84(108)82 (111)63 (111)85 (102)11 (102)12 (110)77(102)13 (110)78 (108)44(104)33 (123)15 (104)37 (108)48 (108)47(104)36 (123)16 (123)21 (111)86 (112)67 (112)66 (112)65 (123)19 (123)18 (108)46(104)35 (108)64 (104)34 (107)45 (107)43 (118)98 (108)93 (116)99 (125)125 (121)143 (117)286 (114)219 (117)278 (113)260 (120)217 (120)213 (106)136 (120)121 (117)104 (125)126 (117)105 (117)103 (116)154 (103)146 (125)127 (116)110 (125)124 (105)192 (107)149 (115)108 (121)107 (125)142 (117)287 (124)221 (116)102 (120)112 (121)263 (121)266 (121)267 (122)244 (124)271(124)270 (128)268 (128)269 (122)237 (122)257(122)256(122)262(122)261 (122)251 (121)248 (121)247 (122)245 (122)243 (122)233 (122)222 (124)253 (124)220 (121)250 (125)228 (103)254 (127)246 (121)224 (121)225 (121)242 (121)241 (121)240 (121)239 (122)236(122)235 (128)234 (127)229 (121)226 (124)223 (118)218 (120)216 (128)214 (127)139 (118)165 (118)170 (118)174 (118)163 (118)162 (118)141 (118)169 (118)172 (118)183(118)182 (124)179 (124)178 (124)152 (118)171 (118)161 (118)153 (118)147 (118)144 (126)132 (126)131 (126)129 (116)100 (116)101 (126)140 (126)133 (127)167 (128)177 (124)164 (124)145 (128)181 (124)148 (127)138 (127)137 (124)158 (124)157(124)123(120)120 (115)159 (118)199 (116)197 (124)195 (128)202 (128)203 (128)201 (118)189 (124)211 (101)206 (118)190 (128)200 (128)185 (128)204 (128)196 (116)193 (128)194 (128)186 (128)205 (124)191 (124)187 (124)208 (124)188 (124)184 EASTLAKE PY EAS T L A K E P Y BIRCH RD PROCTOR VALLEY RD BRANDYWINE AVBONITA R D MT M I G U E L R D FLOWER ST PASEO RANCHEROMEDICAL CENTER DRSAN MIGUEL RANCH R D N 04TH AVTIERRA DEL REYARTISAN ST 03RD AVE 07TH STE NAPLES CT W U E S T E R D MAIN ST HERITAGE RD MAIN ST 113 119 (115)92 (106)29 (109)57(103)30 (114)75 (114)74 (114)76 (114)59 (113)88 (115)87 (110)61 (110)60 (102)14 (115)95 (110)62 (107)42 (118)96 (118)97 (122)265 (122)283 (122)285(122)288 (109)279 (103)281 (103)280 (116)109 (117)168 (121)106 (102)151 (122)284 (122)282 (128)273 (121)264 (122)238 (122)259 (122)252 (128)258 (121)227 (128)215 (127)230 (118)156 (118)166 (124)176 (124)175 (126)130 (120)122 (126)111 (124)155 (124)134 (124)160 (122)207 (128)209 (121)198 City of Chula VistaTraffic Signal Communications Master PlanFuture Traffic Signal Communications Network Map Legend ###System Control Number (###)Communication Number $+Layer 3 Communication Hub 31 Single Wireless Ethernet Radio 31 Dual Wireless Ethernet Radio !(³¸ATC Controller and CCTV Camera Upgrade #*Existing Adaptive Traffic Signal #*Future Adaptive Traffic Signal !(Existing Traffic Signal !(Future Traffic Signal !(Existing Caltrans Traffic Signal !(Future Caltrans Traffic Signal XY Traffic Measurement Device #Ç City-Owned Wireless Tower #Private Wireless Tower Existing Fiber MTS Fiber Caltrans Fiber City of San Diego Fiber Port of San Diego Fiber Future Port of San Diego Fiber Future Fiber New Fiber in Existing COMM Conduit New Fiber in Existing Copper Conduit New Fiber in New Conduit Future Roads ñ City Hall TMC ñ Satellite Maintenance Facility TMC kj Chula Vista Amphitheater --¡Fixed Changeable Message Sign ÇÖ*Portable Changeable Message Sign City of Chula Vista 0 0.5 10.25 Miles Document Path: S:\Projects\Chula Vista\0347_Chula Vista Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan\04 Design\GIS\MXD Files\Chula Vista Comm Phase Implementation Figures.mxd/ 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 152 RESOLUTION NO. __________ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ADOPTING THE CITY’S TRAFFIC SIGNAL COMMUNICATIONS MASTER PLAN WHEREAS, On January 5, 2016, Council approved an agreement between the City of Chula Vista and STC Traffic, Inc. for the development of the City’s first Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan (the Plan); and WHEREAS, the new Plan encompasses four distinct and critical elements: (1) existing systems assessment, (2) needs assessment, (3) future system Architecture and Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) elements, and (4) implementation phasing plan including cost- benefit analysis; and WHEREAS, implementation of the $16M Plan is divided into three phases with a goal of full implementation within 10 years (depending on available funding); and WHEREAS, the new network will provide the capability to provide more efficient and effective traffic signal coordination timing, reduce travel times and greenhouse gases, and upgrade the network for future implementation of adaptive traffic control systems, video monitoring (for traffic) systems, pedestrian and bike counters, and many other ITS, autonomous and connected vehicle, and Smart City technologies. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, that it formally adopts the City of Chula Vista’s Traffic Signal Communications Master Plan. Presented by Approved as to form by William S. Valle Glen R. Googins Director of Engineering & Capital Projects City Attorney 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 153 City of Chula Vista Staff Report File#:17-0339, Item#: 5. CONSIDERATION OF SELECTING A COMPLIANCE TRACK (1 OR 2) FOR THE NEW TRASH AMENDMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE SAN DIEGO REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD AND NOTIFYING THEM OF THE SELECTION RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO NOTIFY THE SAN DIEGO REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD OF THE TRACK SELECTED TO COMPLY WITH TRASH AMENDMENT INVESTIGATIVE ORDER NO. R9-2017-0077 RECOMMENDED ACTION Council adopt the resolution. SUMMARY On June 2, 2017, the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) issued Investigative Order (IO) No. R9-2017-0077, directing the Owners and Operators of Phase I Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4 permittee) Draining the Watersheds within the San Diego Region to Submit Reports Pertaining to the Control of Trash in Discharges from Phase I MS4s to Ocean Waters, Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries in the San Diego Region. Order No. R9-2017-0077 requires MS4 permittees to submit written notice indicating whether Track 1 or Track 2 control measures will be used to comply with the trash discharge prohibition by September 05, 2017. Jurisdictional maps and implementation plans associated with either Track 1 or Track 2 control measures must be submitted to the San Diego Water Board by December 03, 2018. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Environmental Notice The Project qualifies for a Categorical Exemption pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines Section 15301 Class 1 (Existing Facilities) and/or Section 15303 Class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures) Environmental Determination The Director of Development Services has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the project qualifies for a Categorical Exemption pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 Class 1 (Existing Facilities) and/or Section 15303 Class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures). Thus, no further environmental review is required. BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Not Applicable City of Chula Vista Printed on 8/10/2017Page 1 of 5 powered by Legistar™2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 154 File#:17-0339, Item#: 5. DISCUSSION Trash Amendments refer to amendments to the Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters of California (Ocean Plan) and Part 1 Trash Provisions of the Water Quality Control Plan for Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries of California (ISWEBE Plan), adopted April 2015 and approved by California Office of Administrative Law (OAL) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) in December 2015 and January 2016, respectively. On June 2, 2017, the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board (“RWQCB”) issued Order number R9-2017-007 (“Trash Order”), effectively prohibiting discharges of trash from the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (“MS4”) to surface waters and required reporting related to trash controls. The City of Chula Vista (City), as well as the other 20 Copermittees must decide between two compliance paths (Track 1 or Track 2) and implement “full capture” of trash in Priority Land Use Areas by 2028. Priority Land Use areas (commercial, industrial, high density residential, public transportation, and “mixed urban”) are deemed to have elevated trash generation rates. The City has identified approximately 1,800 storm drain inlets subject to this Order within Priority Land Use Areas (Attachment 1). Track 1 requires the installation and maintenance of certified structural devices, see Attachment 2, (“full capture systems”) on all storm drains that capture runoff from Priority Land Use Areas. Maintenance of the devices includes periodic cleaning using hand tools or Vactor equipment to remove the trash and debris collected in the storm drain inlets. Compliance with Track 1 requirements is achieved when the City has demonstrated annually the installation, operation, and maintenance of full capture systems and provides mapped location and drainage area served by full capture systems. Track 2 requires a combination of certified structural devices where feasible and programmatic controls (e.g. catch basin cleaning, street sweeping, trash receptacle programs) to capture all trash generated from Priority Land Use areas (“full capture equivalence”). Compliance with Track 2 requirements is achieved when the City has, “Developed and implemented a set of monitoring objectives that demonstrate mandated performance results, effectiveness of the selected combination of treatment and institutional controls, and compliance with full capture system equivalency. In preparation for the expected Trash Order, on August 02, 2016, by Resolution 2016-156, City Council approved a contract with D-Max Engineering, Inc. to prepare Trash Amendments Baseline Assessment Report (“Baseline Report”). D-max completed a preliminary evaluation of different compliance scenarios considering data from Public Works, Engineering, Geographic Information Systems, and Economic Development Departments, and submitted a final Baseline Report dated June 19, 2017 (Attachment 3). A 20-year planning horizon was considered by D-Max, along with six scenarios from Track 1 and Track 2 (Table 10 of Attachment 2). Overall, Track 1 scenarios had higher total costs than Track 2 scenarios. The distribution of costs also differs between tracks, with a much larger proportion of costs required to cover monitoring, reporting, and program management under Track 2. Table 1 below is anCity of Chula Vista Printed on 8/10/2017Page 2 of 5 powered by Legistar™2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 155 File#:17-0339, Item#: 5. required to cover monitoring, reporting, and program management under Track 2. Table 1 below is an overview comparison of the two compliance Tracks. TABLE 1 - Track 1 and Track 2 Cost Summary Track 1 Track 2 Year 0 (FY17-18)$70K $180K Year 1-5 average cost $680K - 800K $390K - 430K Year 6-10 average cost $1.1M - 1.4M $630K - 920K Total 10-Year Implementation Cost (Year 10 is full compliance) $8.9M - 10.8M $5.1M - 6.7M Total Maintenance Cost (Year 11-20) $8.2M - 12.1M $5.8M - 6.9M Total 20-Year Program Cost $17.7M - 22.7M $10.9M - 13.6M The San Diego RWQCB has indicated that it will be acceptable for a city to initially select a Track 2 approach and then later switch to a Track 1 approach. This strategy might be desirable if, for example, after implementing the first few years of a Track 2 program, the City finds that its nonstructural BMP efforts turn out to be less effective or more costly than anticipated. Switching from Track 2 to Track 1 in year 5 will cost an average of $1.1M - 1.4M per year in years 6-10. The total 20 -year cost for switching Tracks is $15.7M - 21.2M. The Trash Order requires the City to notify the San Diego RWQCB of the selected compliance track by no later than September 5, 2017. It also requires the City to submit implementation maps, time schedules and (if applicable) compliance plans by December 3, 2018. These requirements will be incorporated into the San Diego Region’s MS4 Permit during 2018 as part of the 5-year permit renewal process. Based upon an analysis of the two tracks, staff is recommending that the San Diego RWQCB be notified that the City is selecting the Track 2 approach to comply with the Trash Amendment Investigative Order (IO) No. R9-2017-0077. DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT Staff has reviewed the decision contemplated by this action and has determined that it is not site- specific and consequently, the 500-foot rule found in California Code of Regulations Title 2, section 18702.2(a)(11), is not applicable to this decision for purposes of determining a disqualifying real property-related financial conflict of interest under the Political Reform Act (Cal. Gov't Code § 87100, et seq.). Staff is not independently aware, and has not been informed by any City Council member, of any other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter. LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS The City’s Strategic Plan has five major goals: Operational Excellence, Economic Vitality, Healthy Community, Strong and Secure Neighborhoods and a Connected Community. Authorizing the City City of Chula Vista Printed on 8/10/2017Page 3 of 5 powered by Legistar™2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 156 File#:17-0339, Item#: 5. Community, Strong and Secure Neighborhoods and a Connected Community. Authorizing the City Manager or his Designee to notify the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board of the Track Selected supports Operational Excellence as it allows the City to comply with the Trash Amendment Investigative Order No. R9-2017-0077 within its jurisdictions. CURRENT YEAR FISCAL IMPACT If Track 2 compliance is approved by City Council, City must prepare and submit an Implementation Plan to the San Diego RWQCB by December 03, 2018. Funds to cover preparing and submitting the Implementation Plan is available in the Engineering & Capital Projects budget for Fiscal Year 2017- 2018. Therefore, no appropriation is required. ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT Funds to cover the remaining costs ($110,000) for preparing and submitting the Implementation Plan will be budgeted as part of the Engineering & Capital Projects budget for FY2018-2019. In addition, the estimated funds required for covering the Trash Amendment implementation program will be programmed as part of the Engineering & Capital Projects and Public Works Operations Departments budgets for Fiscal Years 2018-2019 through 2028-2029 as part of the normal budget process as outlined in the Table 3 below. Funding has not been identified and may result in additional fiscal impacts to the General Fund budget which will be reflected in the updated Long-Term Financial forecast. Table 3 - Average Annual Cost for Years 1-20 Capital Cost Maintenance Cost Repair & Replacement Costs Non- Structural BMP Costs Planning, Monitoring, & Reporting Costs Annual Cost with Contingency Year 1 $57,035 $12,439 $519 $0 $170,000 $287,991 Year 2 $84,920 $31,083 $1,291 $0 $170,000 $344,751 Year 3 $113,080 $55,781 $2,319 $1,500 $170,000 $411,215 Year 4 $122,045 $82,487 $3,428 $6,540 $170,000 $461,399 Year 5 $124,355 $109,693 $4,559 $22,129 $170,000 $516,883 Year 6 $123,915 $136,827 $11,389 $38,678 $170,000 $576,969 Year 7 $121,605 $163,460 $15,283 $36,178 $170,000 $607,830 Year 8 $120,340 $189,657 $19,193 $57,846 $170,000 $668,443 Year 9 $119,460 $215,607 $21,175 $68,078 $170,000 $713,184 Year 10 $115,687 $240,420 $22,458 $88,180 $170,000 $764,095 Year 11 $0 $240,420 $22,984 $79,980 $170,000 $616,061 Year 12 $0 $240,420 $23,032 $79,980 $170,000 $616,118 Year 13 $0 $240,420 $23,187 $79,980 $170,000 $616,304 Year 14 $0 $240,420 $23,189 $79,980 $170,000 $616,306 Year 15 $0 $240,420 $22,835 $79,980 $170,000 $615,882 Year 16 $0 $240,420 $33,144 $79,980 $170,000 $628,252 Year 17 $0 $240,420 $43,723 $79,980 $170,000 $640,948 Year 18 $0 $240,420 $54,539 $79,980 $170,000 $653,926 Year 19 $0 $240,420 $57,914 $79,980 $170,000 $657,976 Year 20 $0 $240,420 $58,329 $79,980 $170,000 $658,474City of Chula Vista Printed on 8/10/2017Page 4 of 5 powered by Legistar™2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 157 File#:17-0339, Item#: 5. Capital Cost MaintenanceCost Repair &ReplacementCosts Non-StructuralBMP Costs Planning,Monitoring, &ReportingCosts Annual Cost withContingencyYear 1 $57,035 $12,439 $519 $0 $170,000 $287,991Year 2 $84,920 $31,083 $1,291 $0 $170,000 $344,751Year 3 $113,080 $55,781 $2,319 $1,500 $170,000 $411,215Year 4 $122,045 $82,487 $3,428 $6,540 $170,000 $461,399Year 5 $124,355 $109,693 $4,559 $22,129 $170,000 $516,883Year 6 $123,915 $136,827 $11,389 $38,678 $170,000 $576,969Year 7 $121,605 $163,460 $15,283 $36,178 $170,000 $607,830Year 8 $120,340 $189,657 $19,193 $57,846 $170,000 $668,443Year 9 $119,460 $215,607 $21,175 $68,078 $170,000 $713,184Year 10 $115,687 $240,420 $22,458 $88,180 $170,000 $764,095Year 11 $0 $240,420 $22,984 $79,980 $170,000 $616,061Year 12 $0 $240,420 $23,032 $79,980 $170,000 $616,118Year 13 $0 $240,420 $23,187 $79,980 $170,000 $616,304Year 14 $0 $240,420 $23,189 $79,980 $170,000 $616,306 Year 15 $0 $240,420 $22,835 $79,980 $170,000 $615,882 Year 16 $0 $240,420 $33,144 $79,980 $170,000 $628,252 Year 17 $0 $240,420 $43,723 $79,980 $170,000 $640,948 Year 18 $0 $240,420 $54,539 $79,980 $170,000 $653,926 Year 19 $0 $240,420 $57,914 $79,980 $170,000 $657,976 Year 20 $0 $240,420 $58,329 $79,980 $170,000 $658,474 ATTACHMENTS 1. City of Chula Vista Priority Land Use Areas 2. Full Capture System Devices 3. City of Chula Vista Trash Amendments Baseline Assessment Report dated June 19, 2017 Staff Contact: Boushra Salem, Senior Civil Engineer, Department of Engineering & Capital Projects City of Chula Vista Printed on 8/10/2017Page 5 of 5 powered by Legistar™2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 158 Attachment 1 City of Chula Vista Priority Land Use Areas 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 159 Attachment 2 Full Capture Devices BMP Type Description Example Photo Connector Pipe Screen (CPS) CPS manufactured by StormTek was used in cost calculations Can be installed in catch basins and clean outs. Bolted in front of the outlet pipe. Drainage Insert (grate inlet style) The Grate Inlet Skimmer Box (GISB) manufactured by Bio Clean was used in cost calculations Typically installed in smaller catch basins with grated inlets. Usually more frequent maintenance than CPS. Automatic Retractable Screen (ARS) ARS manufactured by United Stormwater was used in cost calculations Installed at curb inlets. ARS is not a full capture device. However, when used in conjunction with a CPS, the ARS keeps debris out of the drain and allows it to be picked up by street sweeping, thus reducing the required maintenance frequency for CPS. 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 160 Attachment 3 JUNE 19, 2017 Prepared For: City of Chula Vista 1800 Maxwell Road Chula Vista, CA 91911 Prepared By: D-MAX Engineering, Inc & Larry Walker Associates CITY OF CHULA VISTA TRASH AMENDMENTS BASELINE ASSESSMENT Trash Assessment Baseline Study and Structural BMP Feasibility Report 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 161 City of Chula Vista Compliance Track Evaluation for the Statewide Trash Amendments Page 2 Table of Contents 1. Background ........................................................................................................................ 4 2. Purpose .............................................................................................................................. 4 3. Identification of Priority Land Use Areas and Affected Inlets ............................................... 5 3.1 Priority Land Use Identification .................................................................................... 5 3.1.1 Identification of Affected Inlets .............................................................................. 6 3.2 Pilot Investigation of Alternative Priority Land Use Area ............................................... 6 4. Full Capture System Equivalency Options .......................................................................... 6 4.1 General Approach ........................................................................................................ 7 4.2 Full Capture System Equivalency ................................................................................ 7 5. Track 1 Assessment ..........................................................................................................10 5.1 Structural BMP Types .................................................................................................10 5.2 Scenarios 1A through 1C ............................................................................................11 5.3 Scenario 1D ................................................................................................................12 5.4 Track 1 Implementation Schedule ...............................................................................13 5.5 Track 1 Implementation, Monitoring, and Reporting ....................................................14 5.6 Track 1 Costs ..............................................................................................................14 6. Track 2 Assessment ..........................................................................................................16 6.1 Track 2 Approach .......................................................................................................16 6.2 Track 2 Scenarios .......................................................................................................16 6.3 Existing Activities and Enhanced Efforts .....................................................................17 6.4 Track 2 Implementation Schedule ...............................................................................21 6.5 Track 2 Implementation, Monitoring, and Reporting ....................................................21 6.6 Track 2 Costs ..............................................................................................................21 7. Track-Switching Assessment .............................................................................................23 7.1 Scenario Assessed .....................................................................................................23 7.2 Costs for Track-Switching Approach ...........................................................................23 8. Discussion .........................................................................................................................24 8.1 Track Cost Comparison ..............................................................................................24 8.2 Track-Switching Costs ................................................................................................26 8.3 Other Risk Factors ......................................................................................................26 8.3.1 Compliance Confidence .......................................................................................26 8.3.2 Flooding and Infrastructure Damage ....................................................................27 8.4 Impact on WQIP Goals ...............................................................................................27 9. Conclusions .......................................................................................................................29 10. References .....................................................................................................................31 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 162 City of Chula Vista Trash Amendments Baseline Assessment Page 3 List of Appendices and Attachments Appendix A – Identifying and Classifying Priority Land Uses Appendix B – Visual Trash Assessment for Alternate Land Uses Appendix C – Large BMP Analysis Appendix D – Cost Calculations List of Tables Table 1. Key Dates for Trash Amendment Adoption and Compliance ........................................ 4 Table 2. Priority Land Use Breakdown for the City of Chula Vista .............................................. 6 Table 3. FCSE Calculation from PLU areas in tons per year ...................................................... 8 Table 4. BMP types used in primary Track 1 assessment .........................................................10 Table 5. 20-Year Costs for Track 1 Scenarios ...........................................................................15 Table 6. Existing Trash Removal Efforts ...................................................................................18 Table 7. Enhanced Trash Removal Efforts ................................................................................19 Table 8. 20-Year Costs for Track 2 Scenarios ...........................................................................22 Table 9. 20-Year Costs If Switching From Track 2 to Track 1 after 5 Years ..............................23 Table 10. 20-Year Costs for All Scenarios ................................................................................25 List of Figures Figure 1. Modeled Trash Generation Rates for Priority Land Use parcels in the City of Chula Vista ........................................................................................................................................... 9 Figure 2. Example Strategic Location for CPS Installation. .......................................................13 Figure 3. Cost Comparison for Track 1 Scenarios ....................................................................15 Figure 4. Cost Comparison for Track 2 Scenarios ....................................................................22 Figure 5. Costs Breakdown if Switching from Track 2 to Track 1 ..............................................24 Figure 6. 20-year Costs for All Scenarios .................................................................................25 Figure 7. Comparison of Annual Costs for Track-Switching vs. Standard Scenarios ................26 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 163 City of Chula Vista Trash Amendments Baseline Assessment Page 4 1. Background In April 2015, the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) adopted Amendments to the Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters of California (Ocean Plan) as well as the Water Quality Control Plan for Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries (ISWEBE Plan) – collectively referred to as the “Trash Amendments.” The Trash Amendments provide two “tracks” that the City of Chula Vista (City) may select from to pursue compliance:  Track 1: The City must install and maintain “full capture devices” in its MS4 to capture trash in runoff from all “priority land uses” in the City’s jurisdiction.  Track 2: The City must use a combination of full capture devices and other structural and non-structural BMPs to achieve an overall trash load reduction equivalent to what would be achieved in the Track 1 approach. The Trash Amendments are statewide regulations, but the actual mandate to comply with the Trash Amendments was a 13383 Order (No. R9-2017-0077) issued by the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board (Regional Board). This order dictates the timeline for the City to make its decision between Track 1 and Track 2 and to submit initial trash program documentation to the Regional Board. The compliance timeline is shown in Table 1. Table 1. Key Dates for Trash Amendment Adoption and Compliance Item Date Adoption by the SWRCB April 7, 2015 Approval by OAL December 2, 2015 (“Effective Date”) Approval by USEPA January 12, 2016 13383 Order issued by the San Diego Regional Board June 2, 2017 Permittee Selection of Compliance Track (Track 1 or 2) September 5, 2017 If the Permittee Selects Track 2……. Submittal of an Implementation Plan December 3, 2018 Final Compliance with Trash Amendments Anticipated ~December 2028 10 years from first implementing permit, but no later than 15 years from Effective Date (December 2, 2030) 2. Purpose The purpose of this baseline assessment is to provide the City with information to make an informed decision between a Track 1 and a Track 2 approach. The largest component of this effort involves identifying the BMPs, both structural and non-structural, needed to achieve compliance under each Track and then developing planning-level estimates of the quantities and associated costs. Additionally, this assessment includes information on differences in the anticipated compliance confidence associated with each Track. Furthermore, the City is also 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 164 City of Chula Vista Trash Amendments Baseline Assessment Page 5 obligated to meet trash-related goals set forth in the San Diego Bay Watershed Management Area Water Quality Improvement Plan (WQIP). Since there may be significant programmatic overlap in achieving compliance with both the Trash Amendments and the WQIP, this report also provides an assessment of how each Track option will affect the City’s compliance with trash-related WQIP goals. 3. Identification of Priority Land Use Areas and Affected Inlets 3.1 Priority Land Use Identification The Statewide Trash Amendments require the City to address trash in Priority Land Use (PLU) areas or equivalent alternative land use areas via full capture devices (Track 1) or to implement BMPs throughout the City to address the amount of trash equivalent to the amount generated in PLU areas (Track 2). As such, the first step for assessing compliance options is to determine the extent of the PLUs within the City’s jurisdiction. PLU areas include: • High-density residential (≥10 dwelling units per acre), • Industrial, • Commercial, • Mixed urban (combination of high-density residential, industrial, and commercial), and • Public transportation stations. A land use analysis was performed using the most recent land use GIS data provided by the City. The 391 discrete land use categories present within boundaries of the City were compared to the definitions of the five PLUs designated in the Trash Amendments to determine which land uses and parcels fall within the PLU definitions. The analysis resulted in the designation of 261 of the land uses within the dataset as PLUs under the Trash Amendments. The City land use categories do not match up exactly with the definition of high-density residential land use in the Trash Amendments (i.e. ≥10 dwelling units per acre). Therefore, for several of the residential land use categories, a GIS analysis was performed to calculate the number of dwelling units per acre. An updated summary of the PLUs within the City’s jurisdiction is provided in Table 2 and the final estimated PLU areas within the City are illustrated in Figure A-1 of Appendix A. Note that while the portion of the City that lies east of I-805 contributes a larger amount of total PLU area, that side of the City is significantly larger overall and the ratio of PLU to non-PLU areas is actually higher on the west side of I-805. The City conducted a thorough review of the identified PLUs and the assumptions used during the identification process. Detailed information about the PLUs and the assumptions utilized in developing the City’s PLUs is provided in Appendix A. 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 165 City of Chula Vista Trash Amendments Baseline Assessment Page 6 Table 2. Priority Land Use Breakdown for the City of Chula Vista Priority Land Use Total Area in City Area by East/West (acres) Percent of Total PLUs (sq mi) (acres) East of I-805 West of I-805 Commercial 2.18 1,397.69 784.37 613.31 29% High Density Residential 4.18 2,676.13 1,616.59 1,059.54 56% Mixed Urban 0.07 45.39 4.79 40.60 1% Industrial 0.90 575.12 175.55 399.57 12% Public Transportation Stations 0.16 105.32 19.40 85.92 2% Total 7.50 4,799.65 2,600.71 2,198.94 100% 3.1.1 Identification of Affected Inlets Under a Track 1 compliance approach, full capture trash control devices are required to be installed at storm drain structures that receive runoff from PLUs. GIS analysis was used to identify storm drain structures that receive runoff from PLUs. A total of 2,662 such inlet structures, herein referred to as “PLU inlets,” were identified. These locations are mapped in Figure A-1 of Appendix A. 3.2 Pilot Investigation of Alternative Priority Land Use Area The Trash Amendments also allow a municipality to select alternative land use areas that differ from the specified PLU categories. Exact areas for potential alternative PLUs were not identified during discussions with the City, so no alternative PLU areas were incorporated into this baseline study. However, the City expressed interest in exploring this option further. Therefore, a pilot-level investigation was conducted to visually assess the amounts of trash found in specific PLU and non-PLU areas of the City and assesses the feasibility of utilizing alternative PLU areas in the future. The investigation is discussed in Appendix B. 4. Full Capture System Equivalency Options In order to develop a compliance approach estimate for the funding needed under a Track 2 approach, an estimate of a full capture system equivalency (FCSE) value is needed. FCSE is a trash load reduction target the City would need to meet through implementation of a combination of programmatic, operational, and structural controls. Achievement of the FCSE target demonstrates compliance with the Trash Amendments. The Trash Amendments provide two examples of approaches to determine FCSE: (1) a trash capture rate approach and (2) a reference approach. Both methods rely on measuring or otherwise quantifying the amount of trash captured by full capture devices to establish a baseline value. 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 166 City of Chula Vista Trash Amendments Baseline Assessment Page 7 4.1 General Approach The method used to quantify trash generation was based on a literature review but it also allows for future refinement based on results from pilot studies, such as the efforts currently underway by the County of San Diego to monitor area-specific trash generation. A literature review was conducted, which focused on four trash generation studies completed within the United States: two in California1,2and two in Maryland3. The studies were compared and analyzed for relevance to the City. A comparison of the studies is presented in Table A-4 of Appendix A. These studies were used to determine the trash generation rates (TGRs) associated with PLU classifications as defined by the Trash Amendments. The literature review was used to determine a series of metrics correlated with TGRs. A geospatial analysis using median household income and population density data from the 2010 Census was conducted to evaluate and characterize these metrics for each of the four study cities. Then, regression was used to determine the best fit model between the derived metrics and the literature TGRs to isolate the best predictor of TGRs for each category of PLU. The TGRs obtained as described above were based on the best available trash generation data from the literature. However, since none of the available studies characterized trash generation rates within the San Diego region, the County of San Diego’s Regional Trash Generation Rate Study will provide valuable region-specific data upon its completion, which is scheduled for fall 2017. If this study finds that trash generation rates in San Diego County are significantly different than in the areas from the literature study, this region-specific trash generation data could be incorporated into the model in the future. 4.2 Full Capture System Equivalency After the literature review and model development, it was determined that the metric that provided the best fit for the published TGRs for commercial and industrial land uses was the ratio of Median Household Income (MHI) to Population Density. For high density residential PLUs, the best fit model was obtained using the MHI and population density from census blocks with greater than or equal to 10 households, as High Density Residential is defined by the Trash Amendments. TGRs for mixed urban and public transportation station PLUs were not represented in the available literature, and thus, were derived from the average of the Commercial, Industrial, and High Density Residential Trash Generation Rates. In order to calculate the FCSE for the City at this stage, the TGR model was applied to the census metrics associated with each individual PLU parcel, generating a range of TGRs throughout the City, see Figure 1. Following the literature, TGRs are expressed in units of gallons per acre per year. The TGRs were multiplied by the acreage for each parcel and PLU combination. The trash generated per year in gallons was converted into tons per year, and then the weight of trash in tons generated per parcel was summed for each category of PLU (Table 3). 1County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works Watershed Management Division. 2004. Trash Baseline Monitoring Results, Los Angeles River and Ballona Creek Watersheds. 2 Bay Area Stormwater Management Agencies Association (BASMAA). 2014. San Francisco Bay Area Stormwater Trash Generation Rates, Final Technical Report. 3 Maryland Department of the Environment. 2014. Total Maximum Daily Loads of Trash and Debris for the Middle Branch and Northwest Branch Portions of the Patapsco River Mesohaline Tidal Chesapeake Bay Segment, Baltimore City and County, Maryland. 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 167 City of Chula Vista Trash Amendments Baseline Assessment Page 8 Table 3. FCSE Calculation from PLU areas in tons per year Priority Land Use Type City Total (tons/year) East of I-805 (tons/year) West of I-805 (tons/year) High Density Residential 60.30 42.86 17.45 Industrial 26.34 7.17 19.17 Commercial 59.45 29.66 29.80 Mixed Use 1.72 0.17 1.55 Public Transportation Stations 3.71 0.68 3.02 Total 151.53 80.53 70.99 The total literature-based FCSE value for the City of Chula Vista is 151.53 tons, or 36,294 gallons per year of trash, based on a wet weight conversion. 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 168 City of Chula Vista Trash Amendments Baseline Assessment Page 9 Figure 1. Modeled Trash Generation Rates for Priority Land Use parcels in the City of Chula Vista 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 169 City of Chula Vista Trash Amendments Baseline Assessment Page 10 5. Track 1 Assessment 5.1 Structural BMP Types Under a Track 1 approach, the City would be required to install full capture devices in storm drain structures conveying runoff from all the PLU areas in its jurisdiction. Based on full capture devices commonly implemented in other regions of the state, the BMPs in the table below were selected: Table 4. BMP types used in primary Track 1 assessment BMP Type Description Example Photo Connector Pipe Screen (CPS) CPS manufactured by StormTek was used in cost calculations Can be installed in catch basins and clean outs. Bolted in front of the outlet pipe. Curb inlet style drainage insert The Round Curb Inlet Basket (R-GISB) manufactured by Bio Clean was used in cost calculations. Can capture trash entering through a curb inlet. Basket can be positioned below manhole opening for ease of maintenance. Drainage Insert (grate inlet style) The Grate Inlet Skimmer Box (GISB) manufactured by Bio Clean was used in cost calculations Typically installed in smaller catch basins with grated inlets. Usually more frequent maintenance than CPS. Automatic Retractable Screen (ARS) ARS manufactured by United Stormwater was used in cost calculations Installed at curb inlets. ARS is not a full capture device. However, when used in conjunction with a CPS, the ARS keeps debris out of the drain and allows it to be picked up by street sweeping, thus reducing the required maintenance frequency for CPS. 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 170 City of Chula Vista Trash Amendments Baseline Assessment Page 11 Other larger BMPs such as Bio Clean Nutrient Separating Baffle Boxes and Contech CDS units, are also considered full capture devices when sized properly. While having higher capital costs than the smaller BMPs in the table above, they can have lower long term maintenance costs since a single large unit can be installed in place of several smaller individual-drain BMPs, thus reducing the number of BMPs requiring maintenance. It is often assumed that the savings in annual maintenance costs will result in these larger BMPs being more cost effective in the long term. However, in site-specific analyses performed by the consultant team in other municipalities, this assumption was not supported. Site specific investigations demonstrated that 1) the high installation costs of the large BMPs combined with 2) limitations on the number of smaller upstream BMPs that could be replaced by each large unit, resulted in higher total 20- year costs for the large BMPs. Additional detail on these findings is provided in Appendix C. Based on the findings regarding large BMP costs, this baseline assessment did not include a city-wide assessment of a Track 1 scenario using these large BMPs. However, full assessments of four different Track 1 scenarios using smaller individual-drain BMPs were performed:  Scenario 1A: CPS with ARS. In this scenario, full capture devices will be installed at all public PLU inlets and at locations in public storm drains downstream of all private PLU inlets. These inlets will be equipped with CPS in most instances and with grate inlet style drainage inserts (GISB) in the small number of inlets where CPS cannot be used. ARS will also be installed at all public curb inlets with a CPS.  Scenario 1B: CPS without ARS. This scenario is identical to the CPS with ARS Scenario except that no ARS units will be used.  Scenario 1C: Curb Inlet Baskets. In this scenario, curb inlet baskets (R-GISB) rather than CPS will be installed at public PLU curb inlets. No ARS will be used. Cost calculations were based on the assumption that all inlets projected as having a CPS with ARS in Scenario 1A would instead have a curb inlet basket with no ARS in Scenario 1C. CPS will still be used for locations downstream of private PLU inlets, and CPS or GISB will still be used for a small number of public inlets where curb inlet baskets cannot be used.  Scenario 1D: Downstream Locations. This scenario is based on the assumption that the City would be able to identify key storm drain junction locations where a single CPS could be used to collect trash from multiple upstream public PLU inlets. This scenario requires fewer total BMPs, but it is assumed more frequent maintenance will be required due to the increased average drainage area of each BMP. ARS will be installed at all public PLU curb inlets in this scenario. 5.2 Scenarios 1A through 1C In Scenarios 1A, 1B, and 1C, one full capture device is installed in each public PLU inlet. The type of device depends on the scenario and on the type of inlet structure, as indicated in the attributes of the SW_Junction GIS layer provided by the City. For example, some drainage structures can accommodate either a CPS or curb inlet basket, so they would have a CPS installed in Scenarios 1A and 1B and a curb inlet basket in Scenario 1C. Conversely, a small, square grated inlet can only accommodate a GISB, so it would have that BMP in all three scenarios. Approximately half of the identified PLU inlets are privately owned, but the City does not have legal authority to require private property owners to install BMPs in these drains. Therefore, full capture devices would be installed in public storm drain structures downstream of these private 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 171 City of Chula Vista Trash Amendments Baseline Assessment Page 12 PLU inlets. Since site specific feasibility analyses would be required to determine the exact locations where these devices could be installed, for the purposes of this baseline study, a GIS analysis was performed to determine an estimate of the number of full capture devices that would be needed to intercept flows from all private PLU inlets. This was done by identifying all the locations where a privately owned storm drain pipe within a PLU connected directly to a downstream publicly owned junction, plus all locations where a private PLU inlet connected directly to a downstream publicly owned pipe. This resulted in an estimate of 365 full capture devices that would be needed to intercept flows from 1195 private PLU inlets. It was also assumed that these 365 full capture devices would all be CPS since runoff would likely be conveyed to the public structure via a pipe, making it infeasible to use GISB and curb inlet baskets to capture trash. Since these CPS would tend to receive flows from multiple upstream inlets, a higher required maintenance frequency was assumed for these CPS compared to CPS receiving runoff from a single public inlet. 5.3 Scenario 1D This scenario assumes that key locations can be identified such that a single CPS can be installed in a structure that receives runoff from multiple public PLU inlets. The total number of full capture devices used to treat public inlets was thus reduced to 60% of the number in the Scenarios 1A through 1C. An example of a strategic location is provided in Figure 2 below. However, it should be noted that all of the public inlets that would have an ARS installed in Scenario 1A will still have an ARS installed in the this scenario, even if that drain will no longer have a CPS installed. The assumption is that having ARS installed upstream of the structures with CPS will still be beneficial for minimizing the required maintenance frequency. Despite retaining the same number of ARS as Scenario 1A, this scenario still results in an increased average drainage area per BMP, so CPS in public inlets are assumed to have a higher required maintenance frequency. Note that the reduction in number of CPS installed in this scenario applies to locations treating flows entering public PLU inlets. For private PLU inlets, the BMP implementation would be identical to the Scenarios 1A through 1C (i.e. an estimated 365 CPS installed to handle 1,195 private inlets). 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 172 City of Chula Vista Trash Amendments Baseline Assessment Page 13 Figure 2. Example Strategic Location for CPS Installation. In this example, one CPS would be installed at the downstream junction (green) rather than installing three CPS in the upstream drains (blue). 5.4 Track 1 Implementation Schedule The Trash Amendments require full compliance within ten years, with permittees required to demonstrate achievement of interim milestones. For Track 1 the anticipated requirement is installation of approximately 10 percent of the total full capture devices each year. Therefore, in the Track 1 scenarios the installation schedule of all BMPs has been distributed evenly over the first 10 years of the program. 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 173 City of Chula Vista Trash Amendments Baseline Assessment Page 14 5.5 Track 1 Implementation, Monitoring, and Reporting Unlike a Track 2 approach, a Track 1 approach does not require the City to prepare an “Implementation Plan” in which it outlines its entire trash control program and submits it to the Regional Board for approval. However, significant staff time will still be needed to plan the program prior to actual implementation. Cost estimates for Track 1 scenarios include a one- time cost for program planning plus additional annual costs to cover program management. According to the Trash Amendments, a Track 1 approach requires annual reporting but does not require a monitoring program. Annual reporting will primarily entail reporting on progress toward installation of all full capture devices and on annual maintenance activities. Therefore, a significant proportion of the reporting program will be the ongoing collection and management of this BMP data. Additionally, collecting data on BMP installation will be completed in year 10, so reporting costs are reduced in years 11 through 20. It should be noted that the 13383 Order issued by the Regional Board indicates that there will be “monitoring and reporting” requirements for both Track 1 and Track 2. However, Regional Board staff added a footnote to the Order indicating that these monitoring and reporting requirements will be based on the corresponding section of the Trash Amendments that indicates monitoring is only required for Track 2. While the 13383 Order still leaves the door open for the Regional Board to issue stricter monitoring requirements, based on previous feedback from the Regional Board staff and on the addition of the previously mentioned footnote to the 13383 Order, it is understood that the intention is to require a true monitoring program (e.g. performing field assessments at outfalls and water bodies) only for Track 2. Therefore, no separate costs were included for a monitoring program in the Track 1 scenarios. 5.6 Track 1 Costs Although full compliance is to be achieved over a ten year period, annual costs were calculated for a twenty year period. This was done to better reflect the impact of the long term program costs that the City will continue to incur even after all of the full capture devices have been purchased. Table 5 and Figure 3 below summarize both the total number of full capture devices installed and the twenty-year total costs for all four Track 1 Scenarios. To reflect the relative impact of different program components, costs have been broken down into the following categories:  Structural BMP Capital Costs: This covers the purchase and installation of all structural trash control BMPs. It also includes an estimated cost to cover the staff time needed to coordinate with vendors to acquire the BMPs.  BMP Maintenance: This covers regular inspection and maintenance of structural trash control BMPs by City staff. Maintenance rates were based on data provided by City staff. Based on conversations with Los Angeles County, the maintenance frequency used for an inlet with a CPS and ARS was three cleanings plus one additional inspection per year. For situations where a CPS will be used downstream of multiple PLU inlets, the number of cleanings per year was increased to seven to cover monthly cleanings during the rainy season.  Repair and Replacement: This includes costs to cover repairs when installed BMPs become damaged as well as costs to cover full replacement when BMPs are damaged beyond repair.  Data Collection, Reporting, and Management: This covers the annual data collection and reporting activities discussed in the previous section, as well as initial program planning costs and an annual cost to cover ongoing management of the program. 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 174 City of Chula Vista Trash Amendments Baseline Assessment Page 15  Contingency: A 15% contingency was included to account for unforeseen increases in BMP capital costs or in City labor costs. Table 5. 20-Year Costs for Track 1 Scenarios Scenario 1A: CPS with ARS Scenario 1B: CPS without ARS Scenario 1C: Curb Inlet Baskets Scenario 1D: Downstream Locations # Full Capture Devices Installed 1,796 1,796 1,796 1,223 # of ARS Installed 1,226 0 0 1,226 Costs Structural BMP Capital Costs $5,009,904 $3,144,790 $3,684,230 $4,007,914 BMP Maintenance $9,018,273 $10,292,218 $12,829,069 $9,694,174 Repair & Replacement $1,361,644 $892,439 $2,135,237 $1,068,871 Data Collection, Reporting, & Management $1,110,000 $1,110,000 $1,110,000 $1,110,000 Contingency (15%) $2,474,973 $2,315,917 $2,963,780 $2,382,144 Total Cost $18,974,794 $17,755,364 $22,722,317 $18,263,103 Figure 3. Cost Comparison for Track 1 Scenarios A more detailed breakdown of the calculations used to estimate costs for both Track 1 and Track 2 is provided in Appendix D. Information in this appendix includes:  BMP capital costs  Maintenance rates  BMP repair and replacement estimates  Crosswalk between storm drain junction type and BMP type  Year-by-year cost breakdowns $0 $5 $10 $15 $20 $25 Scenario 1A Scenario 1B Scenario 1C Scenario 1D 20-Year Cost (in Millions) 20-Year Costs for Track 1 Scenarios Contingency Monitoring, Reporting, & Mgmt. Repair & Replacement BMP Maintenance Structural BMP Capital Costs 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 175 City of Chula Vista Trash Amendments Baseline Assessment Page 16 6. Track 2 Assessment 6.1 Track 2 Approach As described in Section 3, development of a Track 2 approach is centered on the FCSE value, which is the estimated amount of trash per year generated from all the City’s PLUs. Under Track 2, the City must achieve an annual trash load reduction equal to the FCSE. This trash load reduction can be achieved through a combination of the following:  Installation of full capture devices  Existing trash removal activities  New or enhanced trash removal programs First, data was collected on the City’s existing programs that provide trash removal. For each existing activity, a trash load reduction value (in gallons of trash removed per year) was then calculated. Next, a suite of potential enhanced trash removal activities were identified. Based on a combination of data provided by the City and from the literature, calculations were performed to determine an estimated cost and trash load reduction for each enhanced activity.4 The combined trash load reduction from existing activities and enhanced efforts was then subtracted from the FCSE to determine the quantity of trash that would need to be removed by full capture devices. A calculation was then performed to convert this trash load reduction value into an estimate of the total number of structural BMPs that would need to be installed. Additional information on these calculations is provided in Appendix D. 6.2 Track 2 Scenarios Based on discussions with City staff, Track 2 costs were estimated for scenarios using the same BMP types as Track 1 Scenarios 1B (CPS without ARS) and 1C (curb inlet baskets). To show the similarity to Track 1 Scenarios that use the same full capture devices, for Track 2, these have been labeled Scenarios 2B and 2C, respectively. Since the calculation used to estimate the number of full capture devices required was based on a per-inlet trash removal rate, a Track 2 equivalent of the 1D “downstream locations” scenario was not included. Both Track 2 scenarios use the same existing and enhanced trash removal efforts and the same number of full capture devices, but types of full capture devices used will be different, as described below:  Scenario 2B: Drains will be equipped with CPS in most instances and with grate inlet style drainage inserts (GISB) in the small number of inlets where CPS cannot be used. ARS will not be used.  Scenario 2C: Curb inlet baskets (R-GISB) will be installed instead of CPS wherever possible, although CPS and GISB will still be needed for some drainage structures. ARS will not be used. A single cost value is reported for each of these two scenarios in Section 6.6. However, technically, two cost calculations were performed for each scenario, and Section 6.6 reports average values. A “conservative” and an “optimistic” version of each Track 2 scenario were calculated. Both versions use all of the same existing trash removal activities and enhanced efforts. The difference is in the estimated trash load reduction value assigned to each activity. For each activity, two load reduction values were calculated: a low end value based on more 4 EOA, Inc. 2012. Trash Load Reduction Tracking Method: Assessing the Progress of the San Francisco Bay Area MS4s Towards Stormwater Trash Load Reduction Goals. Technical Report (Version 1.0). 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 176 City of Chula Vista Trash Amendments Baseline Assessment Page 17 conservative assumptions about the effectiveness of the strategy and a high end value based on more optimistic assumptions. The conservative versions use all of the low end load reduction values, and the optimistic versions use the high end values. Since the number of full capture devices needed in a Track 2 approach goes down when other activities provide more trash removal, the optimistic versions require significantly fewer full capture devices. For simplicity, the body of this report focuses on the average of the conservative and optimistic versions of each scenario, but full breakdowns of the optimistic and conservative version costs are provided in Appendix D. 6.3 Existing Activities and Enhanced Efforts Table 6 and Table 7 provide descriptions of all the existing activities and enhanced efforts, respectively, that were incorporated into the Track 2 scenarios. A few additional enhanced efforts were also quantified, but were not incorporated into the Track 2 scenarios. Additional information on these can be found in Appendix D. 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 177 City of Chula Vista Trash Amendments Baseline Assessment Page 18 Table 6. Existing Trash Removal Efforts Average of Optimistic and Conservative Estimates Control Measure Description Trash Reduced (Gallons) Existing Load Reduction (%) Street Sweeping Total annual debris removal was provided by the City. The conservative scenario is based on a Bay Area study (EOA, Inc. 2007) which indicates that only 1% of street sweeping debris is trash. However, since these types of studies are limited, the optimistic scenario assumes that 3% of street sweeping debris is trash. 4,070 11.2% Storm Drain Cleaning Data Quantity based on annual average of trash removed during MS4 cleaning 2008-2015. (same for both scenarios since the average amount of trash removed annually was directly measured and reported by the City) 2,045 5.6% Trash Bin Addition Program (Industrial and Commercial Areas) Per the franchise agreement/contract between the City of Chula Vista and Republic Services, 25 additional trash bins used in bus stops within commercial and industrial areas are provided by Republic Services each year. Trash reduction was estimated based on the assumption that each bin has a 60 gallon capacity and that, on average, a bin becomes 40% full over the span of a week. The quantity used for trash reduction credit should only i nclude trash that would otherwise litter City streets. The conservative scenario assumes that 5% of the trash would have been littered in the absence of the bin. Th e optimistic scenario assumes that 10% of the trash would have been littered in the absence of the bin. 2,340 6.4% Treatment Control BMP Cleaning There are 249 projects on the City's Treatment Control BMP inventory. The conservative scenario assumes each project removes trash at a level of 3 gallons/year. The optimistic scenario assumes 5 gallons/year. 996 2.7% Trash Clean-Up Events This includes trash removal data provided by ILACSD and the City for three annual events (Creek to Bay, Coastal Cleanup Day, and Beautify CV Day). ILACSD and City staff reported different trash removal quantities for the Beautify CV event, so the conservative value uses the smaller reported value for that event, and the optimistic scenario uses the larger reported value. 1,631 4.5% Unauthorized Encampment Clean-Ups Annual trash removal quantity provided by City for encampment at 3rd and Orange. Conservative estimate reduces trash removal rate by 50% because counting encampment trash removal has been contested in other areas. One of the main arguments is that this t rash would be going to a water body rather than the MS4, so a City shouldn't take credit for removing trash that's in or along the water body. Optimistic scenario counts the full qu antity. 1,317 3.6% Homeless Outreach Team Program Total annual trash removal for 2016 was provided by the City. This program targets parks, facilities and problem areas of the City. Some of th e material removed is unattended belongings that would be unlikely to end up in the MS4. The conservative scenario assumes that on ly 40% of the material removed is trash that would have made it to the MS4. The optimistic scenario assumes 75% of the material removed is trash that would have made it to the MS4. 3,594 9.9% Total 15,993 44.1% 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 178 City of Chula Vista Trash Amendments Baseline Assessment Page 19 Table 7. Enhanced Trash Removal Efforts Average of Optimistic and Conservative Estimates Control Measure Description Trash Reduced Annually (Gallons) Load Reduction Credit (%) $/Gallon Trash Removed (20 Year) Is Load Reduction Directly Measure- able? Initial Planning /Start Up Cost Annual Cost Additional Trash Clean-up Event organized by I Love a Clean San Diego (ILACSD) One additional clean-up event per year. This event would be on the same scale as Creek to Bay and Coastal Cleanup Day and organized by ILACSD. Optimistic scenario uses the average trash removal value reported from current ILACSD events. Conservative estimat e uses 75% of the current average trash removal value to simulate diminishing returns from adding more events. Start-up Cost: $1,000 to cover staff time necessary to coordinate with ILACSD to initiate an additional event. Annual Cost: Per questionnaire, City pays ~$2,000 for sponsorship of each event. 547 1.5% $3.75 Yes $1,000 $2,000 Additional Trash Clean-up Event organized by City One additional clean-up event, similar to Beautify Chula Vista Day, per year. Since trash removal reports from ILACSD and the City differed for the Beautify Chula Vista Day, the lower value was used in the conservative scenario, and the higher value was used in the optimistic scenario. Start-up Cost: $2,500 to cover staff time necessary to plan a new annual event. Annual Cost: Per questionnaire, the Beautify CV Day costs $15,000 a year to run. 381 1.1% $39.65 Yes $2,500 $15,000 Additional Public Area Trash Bins Adding 20 new trash bins to public areas, such as in parks or around schools. Trash reduction quantities are based on the same assumptions as the Trash Bin Addition Program in Table 6. Start-up Cost: Capital cost to purchase and install new trash bins based on a cost of $500 per bin. (City questionnaire indicated that the per bin cost varies between $85 and $1,500 depending on type). Also includes staff time to determine locations for new trash bin placement and to coordinate acquisition of new bins. Trash bin spacing has been shown to impact effectiveness, so planning bin placement stra tegically can help maximize load reduction. Annual Cost: Hauling/maintenance cost information was not provided by City. Annual cost estimate based on each new bin requiring 5 additional minutes per week of staff time at $75/hr. 3,276 9.0% $2.17 No $12,500 $6,497 Public Education and Outreach Programs Includes advertising campaign to reduce litter, eight community outreach events/presentations completed annually for school -age children (K- 12), and use of free media (PSAs, etc) to reduce litter issues. Outreach must include an evaluation component (e.g. pre-post campaign surveys and student/teacher feedback). Assumed duties would be performed by Storm Water Education & Outreach staff. Fact sheet CR -3 indicates the above activities would equate to a 6% trash load reduction, so that value was used in the optimistic scenario. However, the San Francisco Regional Board called the fact sheet CR-3 reduction credits "grossly inflated," so the value was reduced by 50% in the conservative scenario. Start Up Cost: Assumes 120 hours to develop program. (City-estimated hourly rate for outreach staff is $70/hr) Year 1-10 Cost: Assumes 120 hours for one advertising campaign, four hours per community outreach event, and ten hours for media relations. Includes $1,500 for miscellaneous costs associated with printing and mailings. Evaluation component for advertising and community outreach events assumed to take 80 hours. 1,633 6.0% $11.55 No $8,400 $18,440 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 179 City of Chula Vista Trash Amendments Baseline Assessment Page 20 Average of Optimistic and Conservative Estimates Control Measure Description Trash Reduced Annually (Gallons) Load Reduction Credit (%) $/Gallon Trash Removed (20 Year) Is Load Reduction Directly Measure- able? Initial Planning /Start Up Cost Annual Cost Enhanced Unauthorized Encampment Cleanups Increased efforts to clean up encampments. Could include increasing frequency of cleaning at 3rd and Orange or cleaning other encampment areas (permanent or temporary) identified in the city. Could also include expansion of Homeless Outreach Team activiti es. Trash removal quantities are estimates based on data provided by City on removal quantities and costs for clean -ups at 3rd and Orange. Optimistic: 50% increase in annual budget will result in 50% increase in trash removal. Conservative: 50% increa se in annual budget will result in 30% increase in trash removal. Start-up Cost: Assumes $2,500 to cover staff time to plan modifications to existing efforts Annual Cost: Assumes a 50% increase to what City reported as current amount spent annually on encampment cleanups 703 1.9% $8.12 Yes $2,500 $5,579 Single-Use Carryout Plastic Bag Policies Trash removal percentage is based on literature values, which assume that the City implements outreach programs and performs enforcement to ensure compliance with the plastic bag ban. Fact sheet CR-1 allows 6% reduction credit. Bay Area Permit states that all "source control" trash reduction activities combined can account for a maximum of 10% trash load reduction. Our interpretation of the Bay Area Permi t language is that it should probably require multiple product bans to achieve a full 10% reduction, so a 6% reduction might be considered too high for a single product ban. Therefore, for product ban activities we reduced the fact sheet value by 50% to get t he conservative load reduction credit. Start Up Cost: Covers staff time to develop outreach and enforcement programs. Annual Cost: Assumes 4 hours per week spent on enforcement annually plus $1,000 for data collection and annual reporting. 1,633 6.0% $10.47 No $10,000 $16,600 Enhanced Street Sweeping Per City data, residential streets are swept every other month. This would be increased to once a month for residential stre ets west of the 805. GIS analysis using sweeping data from the City was used to estimate mileage of residential area sweeping routes west of the 805. City data was used to calculate the average amount of debris removed per mile swept. The optimistic scenario assumes 3% of all debris collected is trash. Conservative scenario assumes 1% of sweeping debris is trash and also reduces overall total by 15% to account for diminishing returns. Start-up Cost: $8,000 to plan/modify sweeping schedules Annual Cost: City sweeping data was used to calculate the cost per mile of sweeping and then multiplied by the total number additional miles to be swept annually. 414 1.1% $39.26 Yes $8,000 $15,863 Totals 8,587 26.7% NA NA $44,900 $79,980 Notes:  As a point of reference, the cost per gallon trash removal rate from the Track 1 scenarios was approximately $20-25/gallon of trash removed.  All references in the above table to “Fact Sheets” are based on the 2012 publication “Trash Load Reduction Tracking Method: A ssessing the Progress of the San Francisco Bay Area MS4s Towards Stormwater Trash Load Reduction Goals. Technical Report (Version 1.0).” by EOA, Inc. 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 180 City of Chula Vista Trash Amendments Baseline Assessment Page 21 6.4 Track 2 Implementation Schedule Like Track 1, Track 2 also requires permittees to demonstrate achievement of interim milestones on their way to full compliance within ten years. According to the Trash Amendments, this entails demonstration of ten percent average trash load reductions each year. In other words, the Track 2 program must provide trash load reductions of ten percent of the FCSE in year one, twenty percent in year two, thirty percent in year three, etc. Since the City’s existing activities may provide over forty percent of the FCSE, implementation of new structural and non-structural BMPs can be relatively limited in the early years of the program, resulting in cost savings. However, completely deferring full capture device installation until later years would potentially lead to scrutiny by the Regional Board or non-governmental organizations (NGOs). Therefore, in the Track 2 scenarios, full capture devices are still installed during the initial years of the program, but in slightly reduced numbers. This allows the City to monitor installed BMPs on a small scale and apply lessons learned when ramping up installation over the remaining years. Rollout of the new non-structural “enhanced activities” (Table 7) would be spaced out across the first ten years, with more cost effective activities tending to be implemented earlier. 6.5 Track 2 Implementation, Monitoring, and Reporting Unlike Track 1, Track 2 requires the City to develop an implementation plan and submit it to the Regional Board. In this implementation plan the City must define their FCSE, describe how their program will achieve FCSE, and describe the monitoring program they will implement to demonstrate attainment. It is expected that development of an implementation plan will be a very involved process that will require meetings with the Regional Board staff to discuss compliance metrics. In addition to a large upfront cost to cover the implementation plan, Track 2 is also anticipated to have higher annual program management costs since it has more components to manage. The other major programmatic requirement specific to Track 2 is the monitoring program. This program will require the City to gather data annually from all of the program components and quantify the data to demonstrate achievement of progress milestones. It is anticipated that the monitoring program will also require field investigations, such as monitoring at MS4 outfalls or performing visual trash assessments in PLU areas. Receiving water monitoring for trash may also need to be added to the program in future years. Details of the monitoring program will need to be worked out with Regional Board staff as part of the process of developing the implementation plan. 6.6 Track 2 Costs Annual costs were calculated for a twenty-year period. Table 8 and Figure 4 below summarize both the total number of full capture devices installed and the twenty-year total costs for the two Track 2 scenarios. Costs were broken down into the same categories as those reported for Track 1, with one additional category, “Non-Structural BMP Efforts.” Non-structural BMP efforts refers to both the existing trash removal activities and the enhanced efforts. However, it is assumed that the existing activities will not account for any additional costs, so only the enhanced efforts contribute to the costs in this category. Note that a 20 percent contingency was used for the Track 2 scenarios, as opposed to the 15 percent contingency used for Track 1. This was to account for the higher degree of uncertainty associated with the non-structural BMP efforts included in Track 2. 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 181 City of Chula Vista Trash Amendments Baseline Assessment Page 22 Table 8. 20-Year Costs for Track 2 Scenarios Scenario 2B*, (CPS) Scenario 2C*, (Curb Inlet Baskets) # Full Capture Devices Installed 580 580 # of ARS Installed 0 0 Costs Structural BMP Capital Costs $1,014,905 $1,189,980 BMP Maintenance $3,239,088 $4,044,226 Repair & Replacement $282,001 $646,967 Non-Structural BMP Efforts $1,118,921 $1,118,921 Monitoring, Reporting, & Management $3,550,000 $3,550,000 Contingency (20%) $1,840,983 $2,110,019 Total $11,045,898 $12,660,113 * Values reported are an average of the “conservative” and “optimistic” versions of each scenario. “Conservative” and “optimistic” assume relatively low and relatively high, respectively, levels of trash reduction from the same non- structural BMP efforts. Figure 4. Cost Comparison for Track 2 Scenarios Error bars show the calculated total costs of the conservative and optimistic versions of each scenario. Main columns depict the average between conservative and optimistic versions. $0 $2 $4 $6 $8 $10 $12 $14 $16 $18 $20 Scenario 2B Scenario 2C 20-Year Cost (in Millions) Average 20-Year Costs for Track 2 Scenarios Contingency Monitoring, Reporting, & Mgmt. Non-Structural BMP Efforts Repair & Replacement BMP Maintenance Structural BMP Capital Costs 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 182 City of Chula Vista Trash Amendments Baseline Assessment Page 23 7. Track-Switching Assessment The Regional Board has indicated that it will be acceptable for a city to initially select a Track 2 approach and then later switch to a Track 1 approach. This strategy might be desirable if, for example, after implementing the first few years of a Track 2 program, the City finds that its non- structural BMP efforts turn out to be less effective or more costly than anticipated. One example of a track-switching was included to provide a picture of how the total and annual costs would compare to the other scenarios. 7.1 Scenario Assessed The situation assessed assumes that the City initially selects Track 2, Scenario 2B (CPS without ARS) and then switches to the corresponding Track 1 Scenario, 1B, after five years. The first five years of program implementation and costs match the Track 2B Scenarios. The City would install a relatively low number of structural BMPs in these years but would still need to develop an implementation plan, perform Track 2 monitoring and reporting, and implement new non- structural BMP efforts. Then in year six, the City would discontinue Track 2 monitoring and any non-structural BMP efforts that it had started in years one through five and start installing a much higher number of structural BMPs annually. For year six, it was also assumed that there would be a relatively high amount of staff labor for program management and reporting in order to handle the transition between tracks. 7.2 Costs for Track-Switching Approach Annual costs were once again calculated for a twenty year period. A 20 percent contingency was used for the entire 20-year period. Table 9 and Figure 5 below summarize both the total number of full capture devices installed and the twenty-year total costs for switching from Scenario 2B to 1B after five years. Table 9. 20-Year Costs If Switching From Track 2 to Track 1 after 5 Years Switch From Scenario 2B* to 1B # Full Capture Devices Installed 1796 # of ARS Installed 0 Costs Structural BMP Capital Costs $3,144,790 BMP Maintenance $9,074,524 Repair & Replacement $767,975 Non-Structural BMP Efforts $30,168 Monitoring, Reporting, & Management $1,815,000 Contingency (20%) $2,357,358 Total $17,189,815 * Values reported are based on an average of the “conservative” and “optimistic” versions of scenario 2B. “Conservative” and “optimistic” assume relatively low and relatively high, respectively, levels of trash reduction from the same non-structural BMP efforts. 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 183 City of Chula Vista Trash Amendments Baseline Assessment Page 24 Figure 5. Costs Breakdown if Switching from Track 2 to Track 1 Error bars show the calculated total costs based on the conservative and optimistic versions of Scenario 2B. The main column depicts the average between calculations based on conservative and optimistic versions of Scenario 2B. 8. Discussion 8.1 Track Cost Comparison A breakdown of 20-year program costs for all scenarios presented in Sections 5 through 7 is shown in Table 10 and Figure 6. Overall, Track 1 scenarios had higher total costs than Track 2 scenarios. The distribution of costs also differs between tracks, with a much larger proportion of costs required to cover monitoring, reporting, and program management under Track 2. As shown by the error bars in Figure 6, optimistic and conservative versions of the Track 2 scenarios differ by several million dollars, with the Conservative versions approaching, but not quite matching some of the Track 1 scenario total costs. However, it is important to remember that the conservative and optimistic versions of a scenario are not two distinct approaches that the City can choose between, but rather two projections of the same Track 2 approach. A municipality choosing Track 2 would clearly aim to achieve the higher trash load reduction values of the optimistic scenario, but achievement of those higher reduction credits is not a certainty. Therefore, it may be helpful to think of the conservative and optimistic costs as representing the range of costs for a Track 2 scenario. $0 $2 $4 $6 $8 $10 $12 $14 $16 $18 $20 Scenario 2B to 1B 20-Year Cost (in Millions) 20-Year Costs if Switching from Track 2 to Track 1 after 5 Years Contingency Monitoring, Reporting, & Mgmt. Non-Structural BMP Efforts Repair & Replacement BMP Maintenance Structural BMP Capital Costs 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 184 City of Chula Vista Trash Amendments Baseline Assessment Page 25 Table 10. 20-Year Costs for All Scenarios Track 1 Track 2 Track-Switching Scenario 1A CPS with ARS Scenario 1B CPS without ARS Scenario 1C Curb Inlet Baskets Scenario 1D Downstream Locations CPS with ARS Scenario 2B* CPS without ARS Scenario 2C* Curb Inlet Baskets Scenario 2B* to 1B Structural BMP Capital Costs $5,009,904 $3,144,790 $3,684,230 $4,007,914 $1,014,905 $1,189,980 $3,144,790 BMP Maintenance $9,018,273 $10,292,218 $12,829,069 $9,694,174 $3,239,088 $4,044,226 $9,074,524 Repair & Replacement $1,361,644 $892,439 $2,135,237 $1,068,871 $282,001 $646,967 $767,975 Non-Structural BMP Efforts - - - - $1,118,921 $1,118,921 $30,168 Monitoring, Reporting, & Mgmt. $1,110,000 $1,110,000 $1,110,000 $1,110,000 $3,550,000 $3,550,000 $1,815,000 Contingency $2,474,973 $2,315,917 $2,963,780 $2,382,144 $1,840,983 $2,110,019 $2,357,358 Total $18,974,794 $17,755,364 $22,722,317 $18,263,103 $11,045,898 $12,660,113 $17,189,815 * Track 2 values reported are based on an average of the “conservative” and “optimistic” versions of each scenario. “Conservative” and “optimistic” assume relatively low and relatively high, respectively, levels of trash reduction from the same non -structural BMP efforts. Figure 6. 20-year Costs for All Scenarios Error bars for the final three scenarios show the calculated total costs based on the conservative and optimistic versions of Track 2 scenarios. The main column depicts the average between calculations based on conservative and optimistic versions. $0 $5 $10 $15 $20 $25 Scenario 1A Scenario 1B Scenario 1C Scenario 1D Scenario 2B Scenario 2C Scenario 2B to 1B 20-Year Cost (in Millions) Cost Comparison of All Scenarios Contingency Monitoring, Reporting, & Mgmt. Non-Structural BMP Efforts Repair & Replacement BMP Maintenance Structural BMP Capital Costs 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 185 City of Chula Vista Trash Amendments Baseline Assessment Page 26 8.2 Track-Switching Costs The scenario that switches from Track 2 to Track 1 after five years results in a total cost that is similar to following a Track 1 approach, 1B in this case, the whole time. One common concern with switching tracks is that a City may end up wasting money since it would end up purchasing the same number of full capture devices as it would have if it started off in Track 1, but it would also have to spend money on an implementation plan and non-structural BMP efforts that it would end up discontinuing. However, the cost calculations for the track-switching scenario suggest that the savings in BMP repair and maintenance during the first five years of the program can help offset the costs of these Track 2 components that are discontinued in year 6. Although the 20-year cost of the track-switching scenarios is similar to the 20-year cost of Scenario 1B, there are important differences in the annual costs. As shown in Figure 7 below, at the time of the switch from Track 2 to Track 1 in year six, there is a very large increase in annual cost, because the City needs to install large numbers of structural BMPs in years six through ten. Figure 7. Comparison of Annual Costs for Track-Switching vs. Standard Scenarios Values reported are based on an average of the “conservative” and “optimistic” versions of Scenario 2B. 8.3 Other Risk Factors 8.3.1 Compliance Confidence In planning any program to comply with regulations, the components of the program are generally built around a set compliance target or standard defined in the regulation. However, it is important to note that the compliance standard for Track 2 is not clearly defined in the Trash Amendments. Therefore, municipalities that select Track 2 will need to engage with the Regional Board to negotiate proposed compliance metrics and monitoring approaches prior to $0 $200,000 $400,000 $600,000 $800,000 $1,000,000 $1,200,000 $1,400,000 $1,600,000 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Total Program Annual Cost Compliance Year Scenario 1B (CPS no ARS) Scenario 2B (CPS no ARS), Average Scenario 2B to 1B, Average 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 186 City of Chula Vista Trash Amendments Baseline Assessment Page 27 implementation plan submittal in 2018, and until those compliance standards are agreed upon the City cannot have complete confidence that their planned program will result in compliance. Based on previous interactions with the Regional Board on WQIP development, it is possible that the Regional Board's interpretation of Track 2 compliance metrics may be stricter than what was generally expected by the municipalities. It is possible that a City could plan its Track 2 program and then upon submittal of the implementation plan in 2018, the Regional Board could decide that it will not allow a City to count certain activities toward its overall trash load reduction value or that it will require more conservative methods for calculating trash load reduction values associated with certain activities. Conversely, the compliance standard for Track 1 is more clearly defined as the installation of full capture devices in storm drains receiving runoff from all PLUs in a City's jurisdiction. Therefore, there is much more certainty that a Track 1 approach planned at this time will ultimately achieve compliance compared to a Track 2 approach planned at this time. The lack of a clear definition of Track 2 compliance standards in the Trash Amendments could also result in the compliance targets changing over the course of the 10-year compliance window. For example, even if a City is meeting its compliance milestones agreed upon with the Regional Board, a NGO could observe trash in a water body and then challenge the validity of the agreed upon Track 2 approach and compliance standards. This could put pressure on the Regional Board to change the compliance standard, or it could result in the City having to conduct costly additional studies (e.g. to demonstrate that the trash was not coming from the City’s MS4) to maintain the agreed upon compliance standard. Track 1 compliance, on the other hand, would be much harder to challenge since it is based strictly on installing and maintaining BMPs rather than more subjective metrics such as visual trash observations at outfalls or in water bodies. 8.3.2 Flooding and Infrastructure Damage While all of the structural BMPs considered in this report are designed with mechanisms to allow water to safely bypass the BMP if it reaches capacity or clogs, there is always some risk of BMP failure leading to flooding or infrastructure damage. If flooding occurs and leads to property damage, there is the potential for lawsuits or other claims against the City. The risk of such a situation is likely higher in Track 1 scenarios simply due to the larger number of structural BMPs. However, in Track 2, especially in conservative scenarios, the City will still need to install a large number of structural BMPs, so the difference in flood risk between Track 1 and Track 2 may not be dramatic. 8.4 Impact on WQIP Goals In addition to the requirements of the Trash Amendments, the City is also impacted by the trash- related goals from the San Diego Bay WQIP. These goals only apply to the portion of the City west of the 805 where “physical aesthetics” (i.e. trash) are identified as a “Focused Priority Condition.” To achieve compliance, by fiscal year 2028, one of the following goals must be achieved for the Focused Priority Condition: 1. 95% of the MS4 outfalls visually assessed for trash must have an “optimal” rating. -- OR -- 2. 100% of the high volume trash drainage area for which BMP retrofit is feasible must have structural trash control BMPs installed. 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 187 City of Chula Vista Trash Amendments Baseline Assessment Page 28 Implementing either a Track 1 or Track 2 approach will contribute to the achievement of either one of these WQIP goals, but the degree to which the City’s Trash Amendments compliance program overlaps with the WQIP goals may vary based on the details of the program. One issue is that the land use-based PLU definitions do not explicitly match up with the term “high volume trash drainage area” used in the WQIP goals. Therefore, the degree to which a Track 1 approach contributes to meeting the BMP retrofit WQIP goal (goal #2) mainly depends on how close the correspondence is between PLUs and high volume trash generation areas. A Track 1 approach should also indirectly help achieve the MS4 outfall trash assesment goal (goal #1), since installing full capture devices should reduce the trash levels observed at outfalls. A Track 2 approach would provide the City with more flexibility on the locations of both structural and non-structural BMPs. For example, non-structural BMPs such as clean-up events and increased street sweeping can target the west side of the City, which would contribute to achieving goal #1. Additionally, Track 2 allows a City to take credit for structural BMPs installed in non-PLU areas. If high volume trash drainage areas were defined significantly differently than PLUs and the number of BMPs required to treat those areas was significantly less than the number of BMPs required to treat all PLU inlets, it is possible that implementing a Track 2 approach could still meet goal #2. However, if PLUs and high volume trash drainage areas are defined as being equivalent or approximately equivalent, which is likely, then implementing a Track 2 approach would not result in enough BMP retrofits to meet goal #2. Additional comparison of WQIP goals and Trash Amendment requirements is provided below:  The high volume trash drainage area BMP retrofit goal was developed to correspond with the State Trash Amendments, as noted in footnote 5 to Table 4-23 in the accepted 2016 WQIP. In this context, “high volume trash drainage area” as used in the WQIP would generally correspond to PLUs as defined in the Trash Amendments. o However, the WQIP indicates that high volume trash drainage areas are portions of the City that data indicates do in fact generate high levels of trash. On the other hand, because the default PLUs in the Trash Amendments are based strictly on land use, it is possible that some areas defined as PLUs do not generate high volumes of trash, and vice versa. There are two main approaches to this issue:  Define high volume trash drainage areas as equivalent to PLUs. This is straightforward but could result in the City being required to install structural BMPs to treat PLUs that do not actually generate high levels of trash to comply with the BMP retrofit goal.  Collect and present data to the Regional Board to argue for adjustment to PLUs such that areas shown by data or institutional knowledge to generate high trash volumes are the only areas considered PLUs for purposes of Trash Amendments compliance. This approach would be contingent on Regional Board approval. If approved, it would likely be a more effective use of City resources since BMP installation would be targeted only at areas known to generate high volumes of trash.  The high volume trash drainage area BMP retrofit goal only applies to areas that are feasible for retrofit. Track 1, as described in the Trash Amendments, requires installation of full capture devices in all PLU inlets and does not mention an exemption for infeasibility. In the Los Angeles region though, that Regional Board has developed a framework through which jursidictions can document that BMP installation is infeasible in certain locations and still comply via only structural BMP installation. It is anticipated that a similar pathway will be able to be worked out with the San Diego Regional Board, although this will remain an uncertainty until the details of Trash Amendments application to the Permit and the WQIP are worked out. 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 188 City of Chula Vista Trash Amendments Baseline Assessment Page 29  The optimal outfall rating goal is similar to a Track 2 type of approach in that it is based on performance measured by monitoring rather than BMP implementation. The underlying assumption is that 95% optimal scores at outfalls demonstrates full capture equivalency. The WQIP goals were developed with Regional Board staff in view of Trash Amendments requirements, so this view of full capture equivalency may continue to hold in the future. On the other hand, it is also possible that once the Trash Amendments are incorporated into the Permit, the Regional Board revises this opinion and applies a more onerous definition of full capture equivalency. In that case, meeting the WQIP goal for MS4 outfall trash scores may not be sufficient to demonstrate compliance with the Trash Amendments.  Also note that standard and enhanced non-structural BMPs directly contribute to achieving the MS4 outfall trash assessment goal but not the BMP retrofit goal. It is also important to remember that the WQIP is a “living” document, and the Regional Board expects municipalities to make regular updates to the document. Therefore, it is probable that there may be an opportunity to revise or clarify the WQIP physical aesthetics goals to more closely coincide with the City’s chosen Trash Amendments compliance approach. 9. Conclusions The following is a list of general conclusions about Track 1 and Track 2 approaches drawn from the materials presented in this report: 1. Track 2 may be less expensive than Track 1, but that is based on the assumptions that the City’s trash removal efforts yield trash load reduction values consistent with initial estimates and that the final compliance metrics determined by the Regional Board are consistent with what is currently anticipated. If these assumptions are not met, the City may need to switch to a Track 1 approach. This would result in the City accruing all the capital costs of a Track 1 approach plus the costs of preparing an implementation plan and doing additional monitoring during the period in which it is following a Track 2 approach. 2. Structural full capture devices would be required in both tracks. Connector pipe screens are expected to be more cost effective than other full capture devices. 3. Because Track 2 allows the City to take credit for existing non-structural BMPs that remove trash, such as street sweeping and cleanups, installation of full capture devices can be ramped up more slowly over the first few years of program implementation. Track 1 would require installing fairly large numbers of full capture devices even in the first years of program implementation. 4. Track 2 has a higher risk of Regional Board enforcement actions or third party lawsuits (see Section 8.1.1). 5. Track 1 has a higher risk of flooding damage and associated costs, although since a relatively large number of structural BMPs are also anticipated under Track 2, this difference may not be large (see Section 8.1.2). 6. Track 1 would be expected to result in achieving at least one (% of area retrofitted with BMPs), and possibly both (full capture BMPs may also result in meeting the MS4 outfall trash level goal), of the City's two WQIP goals. 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 189 City of Chula Vista Trash Amendments Baseline Assessment Page 30 7. Track 2 may result in achieving one of the City's WQIP goals (MS4 outfall trash levels) but most likely is not capable of achieving the other WQIP goal (% of area retrofitted with BMPs). Feasibility of a Track 2 approach is largely dependent on how the Regional Board will define full capture equivalency. If a relatively reasonable and achievable definition, like the MS4 outfall trash level goal the City has in the WQIP, is used, then Track 2 is more attractive. Under that type of approach, Track 2 would allow for the City to focus program expenditures on controlling trash where data shows it is a significant problem. However, if Track 2 is interpreted as requiring the City to demonstrate that receiving waters have essentially no trash, or other standards that effectively make the City's compliance depend on controlling sources beyond MS4 discharges (e.g., direct illegal dumping into creeks and rivers or transient encampments), then Track 2 becomes virtually unachievable and cost prohibitive. 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 190 City of Chula Vista Trash Amendments Baseline Assessment Page 31 10. References Bay Area Stormwater Management Agencies Association (BASMAA). 2014. San Francisco Bay Area Stormwater Trash Generation Rates, Final Technical Report. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Diego Region (Regional Board). 2017. Order Number R9-2017-0077, An order directing the owners and operators of Phase I municipal separate storm sewer systems (MS4s) draining the watersheds within the San Diego Region to submit reports pertaining to the control of trash in discharges from Phase I MS4s to ocean waters, inland surface waters, enclosed bays, and estuaries in the San Diego Region. County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works Watershed Management Division. 2004. Trash Baseline Monitoring Results, Los Angeles River and Ballona Creek Watersheds. EOA, Inc. 2007. Pollutant Load Removal From Street Sweeping Best Management Practices: Development of Typical Concentration Values for Pollutants of Concern in Contra Costa County, CA. EOA, Inc. 2012. Trash Load Reduction Tracking Method: Assessing the Progress of the San Francisco Bay Area MS4s Towards Stormwater Trash Load Reduction Goals. Technical Report (Version 1.0). EOA, Inc. 2013. Visual On-land Trash Assessment Protocol for Stormwater. Maryland Department of the Environment. 2014. Total Maximum Daily Loads of Trash and Debris for the Middle Branch and Northwest Branch Portions of the Patapsco River Mesohaline Tidal Chesapeake Bay Segment, Baltimore City and County, Maryland. San Diego Bay Responsible Parties. 2016. San Diego Bay Watershed Management Area Water Quality Improvement Plan. February. City of Coronado, City of Chula Vista, City of Imperial Beach, City of La Mesa, City of Lemon Grove, City of National City, City of San Diego, County of San Diego, San Diego Unified Port District, San Diego Regional Airport Authority, and Caltrans. 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 191 RESOLUTION NO. __________ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO NOTIFY THE SAN DIEGO REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD OF THE TRACK SELECTED TO COMPLY WITH TRASH AMENDMENT INVESTIGATIVE ORDER NO. R9-2017-0077 WHEREAS, on June 2, 2017, the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) issued Investigative Order (IO) No. R9-2017-0077, directing the Owners and Operators of Phase I Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4 permittee) Draining the Watersheds within the San Diego Region to Submit Reports Pertaining to the Control of Trash in Discharges from Phase I MS4s to Ocean Waters, Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries in the San Diego Region; and WHEREAS, order No. R9-2017-0077 requires MS4 permittees to submit written notice indicating whether Track 1 or Track 2 control measures will be used to comply with the trash discharge prohibition by September 05, 2017; and WHEREAS, jurisdictional maps and implementation plans associated with either Track 1 or Track 2 control measures must be submitted to the San Diego Water Board by December 03, 2018; and WHEREAS, the City of Chula Vista (City), as well as the other 20 Copermittees must decide between two compliance paths (Track 1 or Track 2) and implement “full capture” of trash in Priority Land Use Areas by 2028; and WHEREAS, Priority Land Use areas (commercial, industrial, high density residential, public transportation, and “mixed urban”) are deemed to have elevated trash generation rates. The City has identified approximately 1,800 storm drain inlets subject to this Order within Priority Land Use Areas (Attachment 1); and WHEREAS, Track 1 requires the installation and maintenance of certified structural devices, see Attachment 2, (“full capture systems”) on all storm drains that capture runoff from Priority Land Use Areas; and WHEREAS, compliance with Track 1 requirements is achieved when the City has demonstrated annually the installation, operation, and maintenance of full capture systems and provides mapped location and drainage area served by full capture systems; and WHEREAS, Track 2 requires a combination of certified structural devices where feasible and programmatic controls (e.g. catch basin cleaning, street sweeping, trash receptacle programs) to capture all trash generated from Priority Land Use areas (“full capture equivalence”); and 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 192 WHEREAS, compliance with Track 2 requirements is achieved when the City has, “[d]eveloped and implemented a set of monitoring objectives that demonstrate mandated performance results, effectiveness of the selected combination of treatment and institutional controls, and compliance with full capture system equivalency; and WHEREAS, in preparation for the expected Trash Order, on August 02, 2016, by Resolution 2016-156, City Council approved a contract with D-Max Engineering, Inc. to prepare Trash Amendments Baseline Assessment Report (“Baseline Report”); and WHEREAS, D-Max completed a preliminary evaluation of different compliance scenarios considering data from Public Works, Engineering, Geographic Information Systems, and Economic Development Departments, and submitted a final Baseline Report dated June 19, 2017 (Attachment 3). WHEREAS, a 20-year planning horizon was considered by D-Max, along with six scenarios from Track 1 and Track 2. Overall, Track 1 scenarios had higher total costs than Track 2 scenarios; and WHEREAS, the distribution of costs also differs between tracks, with a much larger proportion of costs required to cover monitoring, reporting, and program management under Track 2; and WHEREAS, the San Diego RWQCB has indicated that it will be acceptable for a city to initially select a Track 2 approach and then later switch to a Track 1 approach. This strategy might be desirable if, for example, after implementing the first few years of a Track 2 program, the City finds that its nonstructural BMP efforts turn out to be less effective or more costly than anticipated; and WHEREAS, the Trash Order requires the City to notify the San Diego RWQCB of the selected compliance track by no later than September 5, 2017 and submit implementation maps, time schedules and (if applicable) compliance plans by December 3, 2018; and WHEREAS, based upon an analysis of the two tracks, staff is recommending that the San Diego RWQCB be notified that the City is selecting the Track 2 approach to comply with the Trash Amendment Investigative Order (IO) No. R9-2017-0077; and WHEREAS, the Director of Development Services has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the project qualifies for a Categorical Exemption pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 Class 1 (Existing Facilities) and/or Section 15303 Class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures). Thus, no further environmental review is required. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, that it authorize the City Manager or his designee to notify the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board of Track Selected to comply with the Trash Amendment Investigative Order No. R9-2017-0077. 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 193 Resolution No. Page 3 Presented by Approved as to form by William S. Valle Glen R. Googins Director of Engineering & Capital Projects/ City Attorney City Engineer 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 194 City of Chula Vista Staff Report File#:17-0154, Item#: 6. CONSIDERATION OF SUPPORTING SENATE BILL 54, THE CALIFORNIA VALUES ACT RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA SUPPORTING SENATE BILL 54, THE CALIFORNIA VALUES ACT RECOMMENDED ACTION Council consider the resolution and take action as Council deems appropriate. SUMMARY The City Council discussed the City’s immigration enforcement policies in a hearing on April 4, 2017. Members of the public advocated for Senate Bill 54, the California Values Act. The Council, by a 3-2 vote, directed staff to present a resolution supporting the bill. This item implements that direction. The Council affirmed the City’s immigration enforcement policies and directed staff to join the “Welcoming America” network in Resolution 2017-063 on April 25, 2017. The California Senate passed SB 54, 27-12, on April 3, 2017. The bill is pending review in the California Assembly, which is in recess until August 21, 2017. This staff report summarizes the bill, as amended on July 10, 2017. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Environmental Notice The activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required. Environmental Determination The activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review is required. BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Not applicable DISCUSSION A.Background SB 54, titled the “California Values Act, was introduced in December 2016 by Senate President pro City of Chula Vista Printed on 8/10/2017Page 1 of 9 powered by Legistar™2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 195 File#:17-0154, Item#: 6. SB 54, titled the “California Values Act, was introduced in December 2016 by Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de León, D-Los Angeles. The bill was amended four times in response to law enforcement concerns before it passed in the Senate on April 3, 2017, 27-12. The bill is now pending review in the California Assembly. A vote by the full Assembly is expected in by the end of the current legislative session. According to media reports this month, Governor Jerry Brown is discussing amendments to the bill with Senator de León’s office. Governor Brown reportedly also is meeting with law enforcement leaders about their recommendations, such as allowing federal officials to continue working in jails and expanding the bill’s scope to expand exceptions to include additional felony crimes.. If the bill passes in the Assembly and is subsequently signed into law by Governor Brown, the bill would add sections 7284 to 7284.10 to the California Government Code and sections 3058.10 and 3058.11 to the California Penal Code and would become effective on January 1, 2018. The bill would repeal California Health and Safety Code Section 11369, which requires a local law enforcement agency to notify federal immigration authorities if there is reason to believe a non-U.S. citizen has been arrested for certain drug crimes. The bill would prohibit California law enforcement agencies from using “agency or department moneys, facilities, property, equipment, or personnel to investigate, interrogate, detain, detect or arrest persons for immigration enforcement purposes.” The bill defines “immigration enforcement” as “any and all efforts to investigate, enforce, or assist in the investigation or enforcement of any federal civil immigration law, and also includes any and all efforts to investigate, enforce or assist in the investigation or enforcement of any federal criminal immigration law that penalizes a person’s presence in, entry, or re-entry to, or employment in, the United States,” with listed exceptions. 1.Law enforcement activities prohibited by SB 54 would include: ·inquiring into an individual’s immigration status ·detaining an individual on the basis of a hold request ·responding to requests for notification by providing release dates or other information, unless that information is available to the public (time of release from custody is public information, pursuant to Cal. Government Code section 6254 (f)(1)) ·providing information regarding a person’s release date unless that information is available to the public (time of release from custody is public information, pursuant to Cal. Government Code section 6254 (f)(1)) ·providing personal information about an individual, such as home or work address, unless that information is available to the public (the home address of an arrested individual is public information if the requestor declares under penalty of perjury that the request is made for a government purpose, pursuant to Cal. Government Code section 6254(f)(3)) ·making, assisting, or participating in arrests based on civil immigration warrants City of Chula Vista Printed on 8/10/2017Page 2 of 9 powered by Legistar™2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 196 File#:17-0154, Item#: 6. ·giving federal immigration authorities access to interview an individual in state or local custody for immigration purposes unless pursuant to a judicial warrant and in accordance with the consent form requirements of Cal. Government Code section 7283.1 ·assisting federal immigration authorities in the activities described in Title 8 U.S.C. 1357 (a)(3): searching vessels or vehicles within 25 miles of a border to prevent illegal entry into the United States ·performing the functions of an immigration officer, whether formally or informally ·making an agency’s own database, regarding a person’s citizenship or immigration status, available to anyone or any entity for immigration enforcement; a person or entity allowed access to an agency’s own database must certify in writing that the database will be kept confidential and will not be used for immigration enforcement purposes; any agreements in effect on January 1, 2018 that conflict with this paragraph are terminated on that date ·placing peace officers under the supervision of federal agencies, or employing peace officers deputized as special federal officers, except to the extent those peace officers remain subject to California law governing peace officer conduct and the policies of the employing agency ·using federal immigration officers as interpreters for law enforcement matters relating to individuals in agency or department custody ·transferring an individual to federal immigration authorities for immigration enforcement, or detaining an individual for immigration enforcement, unless authorized by a judicial warrant or judicial probable cause, or for a violation of Title 8.U.S.C. 1326(a) that is subject to enhancement specified by Section 1326(b) (criminal immigration laws prohibiting reentry into the United after removal for an aggravated felony conviction) and the individual has previously been convicted of a violent felony listed in Cal. Penal Code section 667.5(c), 2.Law enforcement activities allowed under SB 54 would include: ·responding to a request from federal immigration authorities for information about a specific person’s criminal history, such as arrests and convictions, where otherwise permitted by state law, ·participating in joint law enforcement task forces as long as the primary purpose is not immigration enforcement ·asking for information necessary to certify an individual as a potential crime or trafficking victim to qualify for a T Visa or U Visa City of Chula Vista Printed on 8/10/2017Page 3 of 9 powered by Legistar™2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 197 File#:17-0154, Item#: 6. ·responding to a notification request from federal immigration authorities for a person who is serving a term for the conviction of a misdemeanor or felony offense and has a current or prior conviction for a violent felony listed in Cal. Penal Code section 667.5 (c) or a serious felony listed in Cal. Penal Code 1192.7(c), which are listed in sections A.4 and A.5, respectively, below ·sending to, or receiving from, federal immigration authorities, information regarding the citizenship or immigration status, lawful or unlawful, of an individual pursuant to Sections 1372 and 1644 of Title 8 of the United States Code 3.Mandates for prisons, schools, health facilities: In addition to the above-listed prohibited and permitted activities, SB 54 would impose the following mandates: ·require the Board of Parole Hearings and the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to provide at least 60 days’ notice to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), such as name and release date, for prison inmates serving a current term for, or having a prior conviction for, a violent felony or a serious felony as listed in Cal. Penal Code sections 667.5 (c) and 1192.7 (c), respectively ·require the Attorney General to consult with stakeholders and publish by April 1, 2018 model policies limiting assistance with immigration enforcement to the fullest extent possible consistent with federal and state law at public schools, libraries, health facilities operated by a state or county, courthouses, Division of Labor Standards Enforcement facilities, and shelters to ensure they remain safe and accessible to all California residents regardless of immigration status ·require all public schools, health facilities operated by the state or a county, and courthouses to implement the model policy or an equivalent. All other organizations and entities that provide services related to physical health or mental health and wellness, education, or access to justice, including the University of California, would be encouraged to adopt the model policy ·require participants in joint task forces to submit a report every six months to the California Department of Justice, as specified by the Attorney General, to include the agencies involved in the task force, the arrests made, and the description and number of people arrested for immigration enforcement purposes ·require the Attorney General to issue biannual reports with specified information by March 1, 2019 4.Violent felonies Penal Code section 667.5 (c) defines “violent felony” as: City of Chula Vista Printed on 8/10/2017Page 4 of 9 powered by Legistar™2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 198 File#:17-0154, Item#: 6. ·murder or voluntary manslaughter ·mayhem (maliciously disabling or disfiguring another) ·rape ·sodomy ·oral copulation ·lewd or lascivious act on a child ·any felony punishable by death or life imprisonment ·any felony in which great bodily harm or use of a firearm is proved ·robbery ·arson ·sexual penetration (by force, on child under 14) ·attempted murder ·bombing ·kidnapping ·assault with intent to commit a felony ·continuous sexual abuse of a child ·carjacking ·rape, sexual penetration with foreign object ·extortion ·threats to victims and witnesses with criminal street gang violation ·burglary of inhabited dwelling when resident is home ·felonies in which a firearm is used ·using weapons of mass destruction 5.Serious felonies Penal Code section 1192.7(c) lists as “serious felonies” most of the same crimes listed as “violent felonies,” with the following additions: ·Assault with a deadly weapon or instrument on peace officer ·Assault by a life prisoner on a non-inmate ·Holding a hostage by a state prisoner ·Attempt to commit a felony punishable by death or life imprisonment ·Providing dangerous drugs to a minor ·Any felony offense that constitutes a criminal street gang violation ·Throwing acid or flammable substances ·Assault with a deadly weapon ·Assault with a deadly weapon against school, transit, prison employees ·Discharge of a firearm at an occupied vehicle, aircraft or dwelling ·Rape or sexual penetration in concert with another person ·Shooting from a vehicle ·Criminal threats City of Chula Vista Printed on 8/10/2017Page 5 of 9 powered by Legistar™2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 199 File#:17-0154, Item#: 6. ·Any attempt to commit or a conspiracy to commit a listed serious felony B.SB 54’s impacts on the Chula Vista Police Department This bill is anticipated to have no impact on current operation of the City’s jail, or on routine patrol and investigation functions. A summary of jail operations, excerpted from the April 4 staff report on City policies for immigration enforcement, is included below. Because the Department participates in joint task forces that focus on crime, not immigration, the Department would be required to submit bi- annual reports concerning task force operations to demonstrate compliance with SB 54 to the California Department of Justice, in a format that would be determined by the State Attorney General. 1.City jail CVPD uses its jail to “book” and briefly detain individuals arrested by CVPD officers. “Booking” involves documenting identifying information, photographing and fingerprinting an arrested party. Fingerprints and photos of all arrestees are shared automatically with other local, state, and federal agencies through a shared data base. CVPD averages six adult bookings into the City jail per day. After booking, male arrestees are taken to the San Diego County Central Jail in downtown San Diego. Female arrestees are taken to Las Colinas Detention and Reentry Facility in Santee. CVPD jail staff does not itself inquire regarding an arrestee’s immigration status, but may become aware of detainers, warrants, or other notifications by ICE that have been entered by ICE into law enforcement databases. Per the City’s jails procedures manual, if this occurs, ICE would be notified. If ICE provides an ICE Detention order, that order is transported with the arrestee to the County Jail. Jail staff: ·Does not specifically inquire about the immigration status of any arrestee. ·Does not proactively contact ICE to detain arrestees or for identification purposes. ·Does not release local arrestees to ICE or Customs and Border Protection, via detainer or any other method. They do, however, release U.S. Marshals’ inmates to ICE when so directed by the Marshals Office via ICE Detainer. ·Does not give consideration to immigration status when determining arrestees to be transported to San Diego County Jail. Arrestees are transferred to County Jail according to CVPD policy and the Jail’s acceptance criteria, regardless of immigration status. Since 2009 the primary use of the City jail has been through a City contract with the U.S. Marshals Service to house individuals charged with federal felony crimes. Under this contract, the jail currently houses only female inmates, averaging 30 daily in 2016. These individuals have been arrested by federal law enforcement officers and are either in criminal pre-trial or trial proceedings in federal court, or they have been convicted and sentenced in federal court and are awaiting assignment to a federal prison. The jail is not used as a detention center for individuals suspected of alleged civil immigration offenses. City of Chula Vista Printed on 8/10/2017Page 6 of 9 powered by Legistar™2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 200 File#:17-0154, Item#: 6. C.SB 54’s impacts on county jails and state prisons As noted in the April 4, 2017 staff report on city policies on immigration enforcement, this bill primarily affects county law enforcement agencies that operate jails and state agencies that operate prisons. These entities routinely handle detainer and notification requests from Federal immigration officials concerning access to and transfer of immigrant inmates. Specifically, jailers would be prohibited from honoring detainer requests or allowing Federal immigration officers access to inmates for immigration purposes, unless authorized by a judicial warrant or a judicial determination of probable cause. Jailers would be prohibited from transferring an inmate to Federal immigration authorities unless authorized by a judicial warrant or a determination of judicial probable cause, or unless the undocumented inmate was subject to a violation of specific Federal criminal immigration laws and had specific violent or serious felony convictions. Jailers also would be prohibited from responding to a notification request from a Federal immigration official unless the inmate was serving a term for a misdemeanor or felony conviction and had a prior conviction for a violent or serious felony defined by state law. 1.County jail A summary of County of San Diego jail operations from the April 4, 2017 staff report is excerpted below: Arrestees from every jurisdiction in San Diego County, including Chula Vista, are taken to one of the San Diego County Sheriff’s Department’s intake jails in downtown San Diego, Santee or Vista. The City has no legal control or authority over policies within the County jail system. Immigrant arrestees are subject to evaluation by ICE agents who work at these jails for possible immigration consequences following release from Sheriff’s custody. Specifically, ICE agents review criminal history, which is tied to fingerprints and identifying information routinely obtained in the booking process. If subject to immigration consequences, including removal proceedings, these inmates are subject to transfer directly from Sheriff’s custody to ICE custody before leaving a County jail. ICE custody could result in transfer to an immigration detention facility or immediate removal from the United States. Sheriff William D. Gore, in a media interview, has stated he believes it is safer for all concerned for ICE agents to take custody of eligible inmates in a secure jail setting rather than have agents seek out individuals after release from jail in public or at private work places and residences, where agents also may encounter additional undocumented individuals. D.Arguments for SB 54 An 18-page analysis of the bill, prepared by Alison Merrilees for the July 5, 2017 Assembly Committee on the Judiciary, is attached. According to the analysis, 126 groups have registered support for SB 54, from Abriendo Puertas (Opening Doors) to the YWCA, along with “numerous individuals.” The only city listed was Redwood City. The “Arguments In Support” section of the analysis states on Page 15: “The Mario G. Obledo National Coalition of Hispanic Organizations writes in support of the bill that ‘using local police resources to support immigration law enforcement detracts from their primary goal of preserving the public order and ensuring that violent felons are apprehended and incarcerated in a timely manner.’ SB 54, it continues, ‘properly ensure that state and local law enforcement agencies,City of Chula Vista Printed on 8/10/2017Page 7 of 9 powered by Legistar™2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 201 File#:17-0154, Item#: 6. timely manner.’ SB 54, it continues, ‘properly ensure that state and local law enforcement agencies, including school police agencies, will not engage in immigration enforcement. Further, SB 54 requires that California courts health facilities and schools safe and accessible regardless of immigration status. It is a compassionate bill designed to afford human rights to all of California’s inhabitants.’ Similarly, Asian Americans Advancing Justice, write that “SB 54 would disentangle local law enforcement from the business of deportations’ and as a result will ‘create safer spaces as schools, libraries, courthouses, shelters, DLSE facilities, and health care facilities, by limiting immigration enforcement at these locations.’ The ACLU of Northern California observes that ‘SB 54 upholds California’s core values of equal treatment, community, family unity, and common humanity by ensuring that California’s police departments, schools, healthcare facilities and courts remain accessible to Californians from all walks of life.’” E.Arguments Against SB 54 According to the analysis, 4 groups and “numerous individuals” have registered opposition to SB 54. Included are the California Police Chiefs Association, of which Chief Roxana Kennedy is a member, and the California State Sheriffs Association, along with the cities of Camarillo, Glendora, Torrance, and West Covina. The “Arguments In Opposition” section of the analysis states on Page 15: “Peace Officers Research Association of California writes that it opposes SB 54 for ‘three critical reasons’ which it identified as the requirement to report task force operations to the Attorney General; the unintended impact of detained immigrants likely being taken outside the state ‘thereby separating them from their families, communities and networks’ and ‘the breakdown of local, state, and federal partnerships [that] will prevent our officers from being able to do their jobs; consequently, violent criminals will remain on the streets and our families will be in danger.’ The California State Sheriffs Association writes that although ‘Sheriffs do not wish to act as immigration police…we need to continue to cooperate with our law enforcement partners to ensure that those who victimize our communities are not given unnecessary opportunities to do more harm.’ The association continues that ‘The bill, with limited exception, precludes law enforcement from sharing information that is not publicly available about persons in custody with federal authorities’ so that ‘sheriffs would still be precluded from relaying information about people convicted of crimes like domestic violence and drunk driving unless they also had current or prior convictions for serious or violent felonies.’ The California Police Chiefs Association also opposes the bill, for the same general reasons as expressed by other law enforcement groups, and concludes about the bill that ‘SB 54 will make it more difficult to work with our federal law enforcement partners in apprehending dangerous criminals, and threatens to create more fear in our communities by forcing federal immigrations operations out of our jails and into our communities.’” Another objection to SB 54 is that it violates principles of “home rule”. Proponents of SB 54 have noted that it is inappriopriate for federal law enforcement authorities to impose its rules on state and local law enforcement. The solution of SB 54 is to impose state level restrictions on local law enforcement. Staff Recommendation: City of Chula Vista Printed on 8/10/2017Page 8 of 9 powered by Legistar™2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 202 File#:17-0154, Item#: 6. Consider the resolution and take action as Council deems appropriate. DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT Staff has reviewed the decision contemplated by this action and has determined that it is not site- specific and consequently, the 500-foot rule found in California Code of Regulations Title 2, section 18702.2(a)(11), is not applicable to this decision for purposes of determining a disqualifying real property-related financial conflict of interest under the Political Reform Act (Cal. Gov't Code § 87100, et seq.). Staff is not independently aware, and has not been informed by any City Council member, of any other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter. LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS The City’s Strategic Plan has five major goals: Operational Excellence, Economic Vitality, Healthy Community, Strong and Secure Neighborhoods and a Connected Community. This report discusses issues and policies linked to the City’s Economic Vitality and Strong and Secure Neighborhoods. CURRENT YEAR FISCAL IMPACT This resolution by itself creates no current year fiscal impacts. ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT This resolution by itself creates no ongoing fiscal impacts. If SB 54 is adopted, the Chula Vista Police Department would have additional reporting requirements. The amount of additional staff time required is difficult to estimate at this time until Attorney General reporting guidelines are finalized. ATTACHMENTS Attachment A - current version of Senate Bill No. 54, as of July 10, 2017, the most recent amendment Attachment B - Analysis of SB 54, Assembly Committee on Judiciary, Date of Hearing July 5, the most recent legislative analysis available Staff Contact: Gary Halbert, City Manager, Roxana Kennedy, Chief of Police and/or Glen Googins, City Attorney City of Chula Vista Printed on 8/10/2017Page 9 of 9 powered by Legistar™2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 203 RESOLUTION NO. __________ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA SUPPORTING SENATE BILL 54, THE CALIFORNIA VALUES ACT WHEREAS, Senate Bill (SB) 54, known as the California Values Act, was passed in the California Senate on April 3, 2017, and is pending review in the California Assembly; and WHEREAS, the City’s immigration enforcement policies were discussed in hearings at the City Council on April 4, 2017 and April 25, 2017, with members of the public advocating for the bill; and WHEREAS, at the April 4, 2017 Council meeting, by a vote of 3-2, the City Council directed staff to bring back a resolution supporting the bill, and this Resolution implements that direction; and WHEREAS, SB 54 would prohibit state and local law enforcement agencies from using agency moneys, facilities, property, equipment or personnel to investigate, interrogate, detain, detect, or arrest persons for immigration enforcement purposes, including enforcement of any civil immigration law and enforcement of any criminal immigration law that penalizes a person’s presence in, entry, or reentry to, or employment in the United States, with specified exceptions; and WHEREAS, SB 54 would prohibit state and local law enforcement agencies from entering into agreements authorized by federal law to delegate immigration powers to local agencies and to designate local law enforcement officers as immigration officers pursuant to federal law; and WHEREAS, SB 54 would prohibit making agency or department databases, or the information therein, other than information within those databases regarding an individual’s citizenship or immigration status, available to anyone or any entity for the purpose of immigration enforcement; and WHEREAS, SB 54 would prohibit placing peace officers under the supervision of federal agencies or employ peace officers deputized as special federal officers or special federal deputies except to the extent those peace officers remain subject to California law governing conduct of peace officers and the policies of the employing agency; and WHEREAS, SB 54 would prohibit using federal immigration authorities as interpreters for law enforcement matters related to individuals in agency or department custody; and WHEREAS, SB 54 would prohibit transferring an individual to federal immigration authorities unless authorized by a judicial warrant or judicial probable cause determination; and 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 204 WHEREAS, SB 54 would not prohibit law enforcement agencies from: (1) responding to a request from federal immigration authorities for information about a specific person’s criminal history; (2) participating in a joint task force, so long as the primary purpose of the task force is not immigration enforcement; (3) making inquiries as necessary to certify an individual as a potential crime or trafficking victim for a “T” or “U” Visa pursuant to federal law; and (4) responding to a notification request from federal immigration authorities for a person who is serving a term for the conviction of a misdemeanor or felony offense and has a current or prior conviction for a violent felony or a serious felony, as defined in the California Penal Code; and WHEREAS, SB 54 would not prohibit or restrict any government entity or official from sending to or receiving from, federal immigration authorities, information regarding the citizenship or immigration status, lawful or unlawful, of an individual, pursuant to Sections 1373 and 1644 of Title 8 of the Unites States Code; and WHEREAS, SB 54 would require agencies that participate in a joint task force to report specified information every six months to the California Attorney General; and WHEREAS, SB 54 would not affect routine patrol, investigative or jail operations of the Chula Vista Police Department; and WHEREAS, SB 54 is consistent with the City of Chula Vista’s immigration enforcement policies affirmed on April 25, 2017 in Resolution 2017-063, in that Chula Vista Police Department officers do not ask the individuals they encounter about immigration status or enforce federal immigration law; and WHEREAS SB 54 is consistent with the City Jail’s operations, in that staff does not release individuals arrested by Department officers to Federal immigration authorities pursuant to detainers; the jail is contracted to the U.S. Marshal’s Service to house inmates charged with Federal crimes; and the jail is not used as an immigration detention center. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, that it supports Senate Bill 54, the California Values Act. Presented by Approved as to form by Gary Halbert Glen R. Googins City Manager City Attorney 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 205 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 206 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 207 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 208 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 209 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 210 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 211 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 212 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 213 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 214 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 215 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 216 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 217 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 218 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 219 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 220 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 221 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 222 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 223 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 224 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 225 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 226 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 227 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 228 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 229 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 230 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 231 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 232 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 233 City of Chula Vista Staff Report File#:17-0258, Item#: 7. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ADOPTING THE 2017/2018 LEGISLATIVE PROGRAM (This item was continued from August 8, 2017.) Recommended Action: Council adopt the resolution. City of Chula Vista Printed on 8/10/2017Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 234 RESOLUTION NO. __________ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ADOPTING THE 2017-18 LEGISLATIVE PROGRAM WHEREAS, the Legislative Program is reviewed and updated periodically to ensure that City staff members have the direction needed to respond to legislative proposals in accordance with the City Council’s priorities and preferences; and WHEREAS, items covered by the Legislative Program can be acted upon quickly by the Mayor or City Manager, or their designees, in order to respond to measures that might affect City operations, revenue resources, and other measures; and WHEREAS, measures which are not covered by the Legislative Program but which are considered sufficiently significant to merit a response from the City, can be brought before the City Council for consideration and direction. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, that it hereby adopts the 2017/2018 Legislative Program, attached hereto as Exhibit A, a copy of which shall be kept on file in the office of the City Clerk, and authorizes the Mayor, the City Manager and their designees to respond to proposed legislation in accordance with the Legislative Program. Presented by Approved as to form by Mary Casillas Salas Glen R. Googins Mayor City Attorney 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 235 City of Chula Vista Staff Report File#:17-0363, Item#: 8. Ratification of appointment of the following: Anna Cabral, Housing Advisory Commission Edgar Hopida, Charter Review Commission Alexandra Mares, International Friendship Commission Tina Matthias, Sustainability Commission City of Chula Vista Printed on 8/10/2017Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 236 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 237 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 238 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 239 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 240 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 241 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 242 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 243 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 244 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 245 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 246 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 247 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 248 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 249 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 250 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 251 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 252 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 253 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 254 WORK HISTORY City of Chula Vista, Recreation Department 1985-1987 Recreation Leader Living Coast Discovery Center (formerly Chula Vista Nature Center) 1987-Present Volunteer and Program Manager EDUCATION A.A. General Studies, Southwestern College, San Diego CA National Association for Interpretation Certification 2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 255 City of Chula Vista Staff Report File#:17-0362, Item#: 9. COUNCILMEMBER AGUILAR: CONSIDERATION OF THE FORMATION OF AN AD-HOC SUBCOMMITTEE WITH COUNCILMEMBERS AGUILAR AND PADILLA FOR THE 2017 STARLIGHT PARADE City of Chula Vista Printed on 8/10/2017Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 256 City of Chula Vista Staff Report File#:17-0353, Item#: 10. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6 Agency designated representatives: Glen Googins, Maria Kachadoorian, Kelley Bacon, Simon Silva, Gary Halbert, Courtney Chase, David Bilby Employee organization: Association of Chula Vista Employees (ACE) City of Chula Vista Printed on 8/10/2017Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 257 City of Chula Vista Staff Report File#:17-0278, Item#: 11. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL--ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2): Case(s): One (1) City of Chula Vista Printed on 8/10/2017Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 258 City of Chula Vista Staff Report File#:17-0337, Item#: 12. A. CITY COUNCIL AND SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9 (d)(1) (This item was continued from 8/8/2017) Names of cases: 1)San Diego County Office of Education, et. al., v. San Diego County, et. al., San Diego Superior Court, Case No 37-2017-00019775-CU-WM-CTL; 2)The Affordable Housing Coalition of San Diego County v. Tracy Sandoval, et. al., Sacramento Superior Court, Case No. 34-2012-80001158-CU-WM-GDS; 3) City of Chula Vista, et.al. v. Tracy Sandoval, et. al., Sacramento Superior Court, Case No. 34- 2014- 80001723-CU-WM-GDS B. CITY COUNCIL AND SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL--ANTICIPATED LITIGATION -- Initiation of litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(4): Case(s):One (1) City of Chula Vista Printed on 8/10/2017Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 259 City of Chula Vista Staff Report File#:17-0292, Item#: 13. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9 (d)(1) Name of cases: A. Rudolph Diaz v. City of Chula Vista, et al., San Diego Superior Court, Case No. 37-2014- 00016795-CU-OE-CTL; B. John Hess v. Dave Hanneman, et al., United States District Court, Case No. 14-cv-02271- CAB-JMA; C. City of Chula Vista v. Lexington Insurance Co., United States District Court, Case No. 16-cv- 01105-BTM-BGS D. Douglas Kalbaugh v. City of Chula Vista, Worker’s Compensation Appeals Board, Case No.s ADJ10459548, ADJ10573765, ADJ10573882 and ADJ10573858 City of Chula Vista Printed on 8/10/2017Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™2017-08-15 Agenda Packet Page 260