HomeMy WebLinkAboutRDA Reso 1998-1589 AGENCY RESOLUTION NO 1589
and
(COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 1(, 048)
JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF ( ;HULA VISTA ADOPTING
WRITTEN RESPONSE TO WRITTEN OBJECTll)N TO THE PROPOSED
AMENDMENT OF THE BAYFRONT REDEVELC PMENT PLAN
WHEREAS, on June 9, 1998, the City Council and ~edevelopment Agency held a joint public
hearing (the "Joint Public Hearing") on proposed amendmen to the Bayfront and Town Centre I
Redevelopment Plans; and
WHEREAS, at the Joint Public Hearing, the Mai ,r, as presiding officer, called for public
testimony, and all persons present were afforded an opportunit~ to testify and submit materials; and
WHEREAS, no testimony was offered on behalf ~the County of San Diego ("County"); and
WHEREAS, a letter which had been hand delivE .~d to the Office of the City Clerk between
the hours of 4:00 p.m. and 5:00 p.m. on June 9, 1998 (the "Ji ne 9 Letter") was distributed to the City
Council, and was received into the record as part of the Joint ublic Hearing; and
WHEREAS, Section 33363 of the Health and afety Code provides that, where written
objections are received at or prior to the hearing concerning the ~ Ioption or amendment of a redevelopment
plan, the legislative body: "...shall...respond in writing to the writt( n objections...The written responses shall
describe the disposition of the issues raised. The legislative be :ly shall address the written objections in
detail, giving reasons for not accepting specified objections an¢ suggestions. The legislative body shall
include a good-faith, reasoned analysis in its response and, fo' this purpose, conclusionary statements
unsupported by factual information shall not suffice"; and
WHEREAS, the Agency staff has reviewed the, une 9 Letter, and has participated in the
preparation of a response thereto in the form submitted herewith marked as Exhibit "A" (the "Response");
and
WHEREAS, the City Council and the governing [ lard of the Redevelopment Agency have
reviewed in detail the June 9 Letter, together with all testimony and reports presented at the Joint Public
Hearing and the Response prepared by staff.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED bythe Ci Council and the Redevelopment Agency
of the city of Chula Vista as follows:
1. Each of the City Council and the Redevel¢ ment Agency hereby approve and adopt
the Response, in the form submitted herewith, as their findings and response to the June 9 Letter.
2. The June 9 Letter, insofar as it constit~tes an objection to the adoption of the
proposed Amendment to the Bayfront Redevelopment Plan, is hereby overruled.
Presented by Appro~ ed as to form by
Chris~.~lomone )~5'hn ,:-Kahenf "~// -.~ r
Director of Community Development ~y
Resolution 1589
Page 2
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED BY THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA, CALIFORNIA this 16th day of June, 1998 by the following vote:
AYES: Members Moot, Padilla, Rindone, Salas and ChaidMayor Hodon
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTENTIONS: None
Shirley Ho[~n
Chairman
Chris Salomone
Executive Secretary
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) ss:
CITY OF CHULA VISTA )
I, Chris Salomone, Executive Secretary to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Chula Vista, California
DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of Resolution No. 1589 and that
the same has not been amended or repealed.
Dated: June 17, 1998 ~"-- ~ J
Chris Salomone
Executive Secretary