Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutcc min 1971/03/01 MINUTES OF A REGULAR ADJOURNED MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA Held Monday, 3p.m. March 1, 1971 A regular adjourned meeting of the City Council of Chula Vista, California, was held on the above date beginning at 3 p.m. in the Council Chamber, Civic Center, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, California. Councilmen present: Scott, Hobel, Hamilton, Hyde, Egdahl Absent: None Also present: City Manager Thomson, City Attorney Lindberg, Director of Finance Grant, Mr. Wayne Carroll, C.P.A., Mr. Dick Chase, Co-Owner of Chula Vista Sanitary Service, Mr. Larry Barnes, C.P.A. Mayor Hamilton opened the meeting at 3:20 p.m. stating the purpose of the meeting was to meet with the representatives of the Chula Vista Sanitary Service relative to their request for an extension of their contract and for a review of their financial practices and capitalization procedures. Director of Finance, Mr. Grant introduced the City's auditor Gordon Grant Mr. Wayne Carroll, and stated they are prepared to answer any questions the Council may have. Mr. Wayne Carroll, Mr. Carroll stated that he has spent C.P.A. this day with Mr. Dick Chase and Mr. Larry Barnes reviewing the books of the Sanitary Service relative to the financial report issued 10/30/70. He is pretty well satisfied that the books are being kept in a business-like manner, and the bookkeeping procedures are adequate. Mr. Carroll briefly discussed the repair costs commenting that this company runs a total of 20 trucks, 9 hours a day, 6 days a week. As to depreciation, they are writing off these trucks over a 5-year straight-line basis. Normally, trucks usually last 6 years; however, 5 years is a fairly reasonable figure. Councilman Hobel Councilman Hobel questioned several of the figures delineated in the Balance Sheet. He asked Mr. Carroll what would be considered as a fair operating profit for this type of business. Mr. Carroll stated that if they weren't making 10% on their investment, then they should b~ in bonds, and they are not quite makin~ this 10%, after taxes. Ne~ Profit figure Councilman Hyde questioned the $13,140.78 discussed reported as the net profit for the year ended 10/31/70. Mr. Carroll explained that they are hoping that with the increase in population, their revenues will increase. At present, they are geared toward a certain level, and they are attempting to seek more revenues so that their fixed cost will remain the same, but that the profit will rise above that. Dick Chase discusses Mr. Chase discussed their /~asing lease program program and the bad equipment for which they have had a great deal of repairs. In answer to Councilman Hobel's inquiry, Mr. Chase agreed that if they were out of the leasln~ business, they would be able to cut d6wn subs~antla±ly on the repair costs. Mr. Larry Barnes Mr. Barnes reported the following C.P.A. figures on the profit structure for the last 5 years: 1967: $ 22,000 net profit $415,000 operating expenses 1968: $ 24,000 net profit $503,000 operating expenses 1969: $ 52,000 bet profit $563,000 operating expenses - This was the year they sold and leased some property. Ownership in Company Mr. Chase explained that he owns 50% of this company amd ~r. Ledbetter ow~s the other 50%. The business in San Diego is run by his son and another person. Mr. Chase stated he has little to do with that actual operation, but does attend meetings with the San Diego people relative to this business. Rate structure Councilman Hobel questioned Mr. Chase's anticipated projections as regard to the rate structure. Mr. Chase explained that, with the new eguipment, they felt they would wait until the next financial statement before they discussed rate structure. He has committed himself, verbally~ that he will not ask for a raise until after this financial statement, roughly 8 to 10 months from now. There are a couple of factors that have a bearing on rates: 2% is paid the City for franchise tax; they have a County dump fee that runs 25¢ per resident in San Diego. If they are talking about a rate increase, without any outside factors, they are talking about 5% to 6%; this is based on the cost of living, increased costs, etc. Accounts receivable Mr. Chase then answered questions pretaining to ample dump sites, now and in the future; the use of plastic bags; the need for a 10 year contract in order to purchase the equipment they need; the "no good" list which are their bad accounts, and the need to bill in advance. Recommendation of city Mr. Thomson referred to his report in Manager which he recommended the extension of this contract for a period of 10 years. City Attorney recommends Mr. Lindberg, City Attorney, advised public hearing the Council to hold a public hearing on this matter. March meetings discussed Mayor Hamilton remarked that two of the Councilmen will not be present at the March 23 meeting, and March 30, the fifth Tuesday, has been tentatively planned for a "floating" meeting o~ the Council. He suggested ~he "floating" meeting be held, instead, on March 23, and that March 30 be set aside as the regular meeting of the Council, since all of the Councilmen will be present. --2-- Motion to cancel meeting Councilman Hyde moved, seconded by of March 23 Councilman Hobel, and unanimously carried that the regular scheduled meeting of March 23, 1971 be canceled and held on March 30, 1971; that March 23 be scheduled as a Council "floating" meeting. Motion for p~blic hearing It was moved by Councilman Hyde, seconded by Councilman Hobel, and unanimously carried that a public hearing be held on March 30, 1971, to consider the request of Chula Vista Sanitary Service for a 10-year extension of their present contract. Adjournment The Mayor adjourned the meeting at 4:07 p.m. to the meeting scheduled for Tuesday, March 2, 1971 at 7 p.m. City rk