HomeMy WebLinkAboutcc min 1971/04/05 MINUTES OF A REGULAR ADJOURNED MEETING
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
Held Monday, 3 p.m. April 5, 1971
A regular adjourned meeting of the City Council of Chula Vista,
California, was held on the above date beginning at 3 p.m. in
the Administrative Conference Room, Civic Center, 276 Fourth
Avenue, Chula Vista, California, with the following Councilmen
present: Scott, Hobel, Hamilton, ~dahl
Absent: Hyde
Also present: City Manager Thomson, Assistant City Manager Bourcier
Director of Public Works Cole, Chief of Building and
Housing Grady
REVIEW OF CIVIC CENTER REMODELING - Architects present from the
firm of Richard George Wheeler, A.I.A. and
Associates: Tom Williamson and George W. Divine.
Director of Public Works, Mr. Cole reviewed the schedule for
Lane Cole the remodeling work. This is Stage
It for which approval and author-
ization to proceed with Stage III,
Working Drawings and Specifications,
is requested by Council. The date
for opening bids by the Council is
July 6, 1971, and the final date
for completion of the Phase III
construction is February 23, 1972.
Mr. Cole then reviewed the proposed
remodeling for the Planning-Engin-
eering offices, the City Attorney-
Mayor's offices, and the remainder
of the Civic Center Building. He
noted the~significant changes in
the plans since the last Conference
held on this on January 26, 1971
and March 16, 1971.
Administrative Wing Councilman Hobel questioned the
reason for the increased cost in the
Administrative Wing - from $5400 to
$7500.
Kitchen Unit discussed City Manager Thomson explained the
cos% of the kitchen unit and plumbing
proposed. Mr. Williamson stated
that the wiring for this particular
unit would be approximately $650.00.
Also included in the cost i~ moving
some walls, adding windows and adding
some hardwood paneling.
Mayor-City Clerk offices Councilman Hobel questioned the 25%
increased cos% for this remodeling.
Mr. Williamson explained that a
major portion of this cost involved
the increased paneling in the recep-
tion room.
Paneling discussed Councilman Scott suggested that
vinyl wall covering be used which
would decrease the cost substantially.
In answer to the Mayor's inquiry,
Mr. Grady stated that the interior
walls are painted about once every
six years, and the paneling would
pay for itself in lieu of one paint
job.
Councilman Eghdahl felt the wood
paneling should remain, that there
wasn't that much difference in cost.
Mayor Hamilton questioned whether
there would be any plumbing in that
wing of the building. City Manager
Thomson stated this was considered,
and it was felt that it was something
that could be done by City forces.
Councilmen's office City Manager Thomson explained the
proposal for the office of the Coun-
cilmen, whereby there will be privacy
in case two or more Councilmen will
be using the office at the same time.
Councilman Scott remarked that he is
against this area being set aside
for the Councilmen's office, indicat-
ing there was little need for it.
Exterior costs Mr. williamson explained the remod-
eling that will have to be done with
the exterior of the building: re-
placing the jail windows, remodeling
patio area; constructing box for
telephone conduit, and two coats of
paint for the entire building.
10% Contingency Councilman Hobel questioned the
reason for the 10% contingency factor.
Mr. Williamson explained thatlthings
come up, change orders, problems that
cannot be foreseen, etc., and the
safest thing to do is to plan for the
10% contingency.
City Manager Thomson commented that
increased cost of labor and material
must also be considered.
Motion to Approve It was moved by Councilman Egdahl,
seconded by Councilman Hobel and
unanimously carried that approval be
given for the preliminary specifica-
tions, as submitted, and that author-
ization be given to proceed with
Stage III, Working Drawings and
Specifications.
The motion carried by the f~llowing
vote, to-wit:
AYES: Egdahl, Hobel, Hamilton
Noes: Councilman Scott
Absent: Councilman Hyde
TOWN COUNCIL DISCUSSION - Present: Director of Planning Warren,
Senior Planner Williams, Chairman of
Sweetwater Valley Annexation Committee
Howard Howell, Gene Martin, Committee
Member, and Jack Ratell¢, Administrative
Assistant
Review of Town Council Mr. Ratelle reviewed the study he
concept, Mr. Jack Ratelle, made regarding the process and re-
Administrative Assistant sponsibilities of developing and
implementing community plans through
-2-
the Town Council Forum. He discussed
the formation of a Town Council, and
briefly reviewed proposed By-Laws
for such an organization.
Mayor Thomas D. Hamilton, Jr. Mayor Hamilton commented that he
envisioned some type of election that
would be held within the designated
precincts for the formation of this
Forum; that prior to adoption of
Planned Community plans, this organ-
ization would have some voice as far
as environmental impact is concerned,
architectural impact, and the impact
of density. They could first review
the plans, submit them to the Plan-
ning Commission, and if the Planning
Commission makes substantial changes,
it would then be referred back to
this group. They would have some
veto power, but of course, all these
plans go to the Council for final apT-
proval.
Norman Williams, Senior Mr. Williams compared the Town-Council
Planner concept used in the San Diego area
with %hat of the Los Angeles area. He
cautioned that there would be problems
if the roles of the Council, Town
Council, and staff were not clearly
defined. It can only run smoothly if
there is a good community-planning
relationship.
Bruce Warren, Director of Mr. Warren commented that thoughts
Planning are now being given for Town Councils
to govern their own communities, such
as in %he minority areas, where there
are a number of problems.
Councilman Scott Councilman Scott stated he envisioned
this group as an advisory body to the
City Council, and that they should
review all plans that come before the
Planning Commission, as it relates to
their community. Mr. Scott spoke
against th~ "direct election" idea as
the connotations of an election would
mean much more than having an advisory
group.
Veto power Mr. Williams reiterated that the group
should not be given complete veto
power, but the Council should make it
clear that their ideas will not be
buried and will indeed be heard by the
Council. The proposal submitted by
Mr. Ratelle, he added, was the best
way to approach the formation of this
Forum.
Howard Howell, Chairman Mr. Howell introduced Gene Martin of
Sweetwater Valley Annex- the Annexation Committee, stating he
ation Committee would head up this Committee for rep-
resentation.
Mr. Gene Martin Mr. Martin discussed the Sweetwater
Valley Civic Association's role in
the Valley, and how this role has been
declining in the last two years. The
Board of Directors of this organization
does not conform to the precincts, and
therefore many areas are not duly rep-
-3-
resented. Mr. Martin declared that
if annexation of the Valley were to
succeed, Chula Vista must show some
interest in forming such a Town-Coun-
cil organization which would be more
effective than the Civic Association.
This must be in the form of self-
government to preserve open areas,
rural atmosphere, and density. Mr.
Martin added that some form of an
election must take place in order to
establish a just and fair membership.
Mayor Hamilton Mayor Hamilton commented there was
no problem as far as he could see,
since whate~er recommendations this
group cares to make can go to the
different Commissions concerned:
Parks & Recreation, Safety, etc.
Also, if the area is annexed, the
people in the Valley can serve on
these various Commissions.
Origin of Town Council idea Councilman Scott explained that the
Town Council idea was inaugurated
by the Council prior to plans for
annexation of the Bonita Valley -
for the Castle Park area.
Committee to meet with Staff Mayor Hamilton asked Mr. Martin to
meet with the Director of Planning,
the Senior Planner and, if necessary,
the City Attorney in regard to the
legality of this concept. In two
weeks they are to bring back a rec-
ommendation to the City Council,
after which the Council will sched-
ule another Conference to discuss
this matter.
ADJOURNMENT Mayor Hamilton declared the meeting
adjourned at 5:21 p.m. to the
m~eting scheduled for 7 p.m. Tuesday,
April 6, 1971.
City Clerk'
-4-