HomeMy WebLinkAboutcc min 1971/07/28 MINUTES OF A REGULAR ADJOURNED MEETING
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
Held Wednesday July 28, 1971
A regular adjourned meeting of the City Council of Chula Vista, California was held
on the above date beginning at 3 P.M. in the Council Chamber, Civic Center, 276
Fourth Avenue, with the following members present:
Councilmen Scott, Hobel, Hamilton, Hyde, Egdahl
Absent: None
Also present: City Manager Thomson, Assistant City Manager Bourcier,
Deputy City Attorney Blick
OPERATION OF "OUR HOUSE" Mr. John M. Beasley, Chairman, Governing
AT 392 THIRD AVENUE Board, submitted a written report to the Council
on the operation of "Our House." He discussed
the meeting held with the Downtown Association
at which the Association stated they would be
willing to meet with the representatives of
"Our House" to discuss their differences.
Dr. Robert Botterman Dr. Botterman stated this was a community
584 '~" Street problem, and not just the businessmen's
problem. He discussed the lack of communication
between these people and that of the whole
community.
Ken Wessel, President, Mr. Wessel discussed the meeting held recently
Downtown Association whereby the Downtown Association voted 21 to 0
to the question: '~re you in favor of 'Our
House' remaining in the central business area?"
Mr. Wessel related some of the complaints he
has received from different businesses and
citizens pertaining to the conduct of the
people in "Our House."
Dave Jones, Volunteer, Mr. Jones indicated the need of a centralized
"Our House" looation for these people.
Kathryn Moore Mrs. Moore stated the entire problem today
1134 Tobias Drive has come about because of permissiveness, both
on the part of the parents and teachers. She
stated she is in favor of the principle of "Our
House" but that these people need to adhere
to the rules set for the operation of the
establishment.
Questions from Council Councilman Egdahl asked someone from "Our
House" to speak on the subject of moving to
another location.
Councilman Hyde wanted to know if the business
association could live with "Our House" if their
conduct is maintained, and if this was not
possible, then where could a suitable location
be found.
Councilman Hobel asked if the business community
would support this in any location; if the
present space is suitable for the needs of "Our
House", and if they applied to DEFY for funds.
Ken Wessel Mr. Wessel stated the ballot they took speaks
for itself--they are against having this
establishment in the central business district.
Kitty Raso, Board of Directors Mrs. Raso remarked she was torn between the
of "Our House" and Downtown two organizations. She spoke of several in-
Association cidents concerning the establishment which has
hurt her business.
Mr. Charles Heaney Mr. Heaney discussed the fights which he
310 "G" Street witnessed mnong the people staying at "Our
0ohn Beasley Mr. Beasl~y commented that they have looked
for another location. They need to be some-
where near the business district, but it is
not imperative that it be this particular
location. He asked for Council's help in
finding another location.
Gary Wappes, Volunteer, Mr. Wappes stated they have applied to DEFY
773 Madison Street for funds and the total amount requested by
DEFY was approved by the County. They will
know in a couple of weeks what their particular
allocation will be; the details still have to
be worked out.
Edward Pillar Mr. Pillar stated he owned the barbershop in
Owner of Barbershop this block. He has lost money in renting a
shop in the back of his business because of the
unfavorable atmosphere of the operation of
Dr. Tom Gitchoff Dr. gitchoff remarked that he is a f~z~aer
7177 Keeley, San Diago director of Youth Services in Pleasantvtlle,
California. He discussed a teen center started
in that city which six months later, turned into
a hangout for this type of people. Dr. Gitchoff
stated that changing the location of the est-
ablishment was all right, but the attitude of
the co~anunity has to change to one of helping
these people, and it was important that these
people be kept within the c~mmunity.
Deputy City Attorney In answer to the Council's inquiry, Mr. Blick
Sam Blick stated that the Council had the power to make
the decision as to the relocation of "Our
Motion to move location It was moved by Councilman Hyde, seconded by
Councilman Scott and unanimously carried that
the Council take the pos~tiem ~hat it desires
to see "Our House" moved from its present
location to one which is more suitable in
terms of possible disruption to surrounding
areas. The City staff is to do whatever they
can to help relocate this establishment.
Motion for resolution It was moved by Councilman Scott and seconded
reaffirming Council's stand by Councilman Hobel that a resolution be brought
back at the ne~t meeting reaffirming Council's
support of the concept of "Our House."
The motion carried by the following vote, to-wit:
AYES: Scott, Hobel, Hamilton, Egdahl
Noes: Hyde
Absent: None
Councilman Hyde indicated there was no need for
the resolution since the Council has never
withdrawn its support.
Letter to be sent to It was moved by Councilman Hyde, seconded by
Board of Directors of "OUr Councilman Scott and unanimously carried that
House" a letter be sent by the Mayor to the Board of
Directors of "Our House" formally advising
them of the Council's concern over the operation,
and i~icating that: (1) the Council does desire
that they relocate as soon as possible; and
(2) in the meantime, until they do move, they
take whatever measures possible within their
resources to assure that the conduct of the
clientele and the operation of "Our House" be
made as compatible as possible.
Recess Mayor Hamilton called a recess at 4:20 p.m. and
the meeting reconvened at 4:38 p.m.
STREET TREE PRESERVATION Mr. Lane F. Cole, Director of Public Works,
POLICY discussed the Street Tree Preservation Policy.
On the undergrounding utilities projects, the
Tree Co~nittee would request the following
statement to be put into the Policy:
"Removal of trees because of an intended under-
ground utilities district should be considered
by the Street Tree Connnittee. Alternatives will
be suggested including those available under the
street widening project."
Mr. Cole discussed the proposed policy of having
the City bear all costs of tree replacement and
sidewalk repair due to hazardous sidewalk con-
ditions caused by City trees.
Motion to approve first It was moved by Councilman Hyde that the City
portion of Tree Policy adopt this first portion of the Street Tree
Preservation Policy by having the City assume
the responsibility for sidewalk replacememt and
to purchase the equipment necessary to save the
trees by root pruning. This is to be spread
out over a three-year period, as reconnuended
by the Director of PuBlic Works.
Motion dies for lack of The motion died for lack of a second.
second
It was moved by ConncilmanHyde and seconded
by Councilman Hobel that the City adopt that
portion of the Policy described in the Street
Tree Preservation Policy as "Uplifted Sidewalks"
whereby the City assumes the responsibility of
repairing or replacing the sidewalks. This is
to be phased out over a three-year period, and
the necessary prunin8 equipment is to b~pur-
chased in order to accomodate this work.
Council discussion The Council discussed the various areas in the
City which have the problem of uplifted side-
walks.
Motion amended Connmtlman Hyde amended his motion to state
that the City assume the responsibility of
replacing and repairing the sidewalks broken
by City trees. The period of time and the
purchase of pruning equipment is to be deleted
in the motion.
Motion carries The motion carried by the following vote, to-wit:
AYES: Councilmen Hyde, Scott~ Hobel, Hamilton
Noes: Councilman Egdahl
Absent: None
Balance of policy continued Mayor Hamilton directed that the balance of
the Street Tree Preservation Policy be con-
tinued to the next Council Conference.
MEDIAN STRIP AND UNDER- Director of Public Works Cole submitted drawings
GROUND UTILITIES ON whereby trees could be saved on J Street without
J STREET the widening of the street. He spoke on that
portion of the street from Ash Street to Third
Avenue whereby parking bays would be provided
at a ratio of % parking space per unit located
on this street.
William Robens Mr. Robens reported that there were 130 trees
Assistant Director of Public on this street, 21 of which could not be saved.
Works
'3--
Median strip Mayor Hamilton asked the Council to consider
having the median strip to Ash Street, since
there will be a median strip going into the
Tidelands area. He asked M~% Co1~ for an
estimate of the cost of undergronnding util-
ities from Interstate 5 to Ash Street.
Cost of undergrounding Fir. Cole stated he received an estimate from
utilities the San Diego Gas & Electric Company that it
would be approximately $100,000. They have
$27,000 carry-over from this year, and will
have $143,000 this next year.
Motion to underground It was moved by Councilman Scott, seconded
by Councilman Hyde~ and unanimously carried
that the Council approve the undergrounding
of J Street, and the program, as presented by
the ~irector of Public Works be accepted.
Also, that the median strip be put in from
Interstate 5 west, and Interstate 5 east to
~roadway.
Mr. Dick Hughes Mr. Hughes substantiated the amount by
Conversion Coordinator confirming that the project cost for this
South Bay area, San Diego Gas & portion of undargrounding utilities would
Electric Company be approximately $102,000. Carry-over funds
for 1971 will be $27,000 and the estimate
for 1972 is $143,000.
Lead time needed Mr. Cole stated that approximately 6 months
lead time is needed for the utility companies
to start construction, and 4 to 5 months after
that for completion of construction.
Dick Hughes Mr. Hughes affirmed the fact that approximately
one year is needed for the undergrounding
project.
Virg Larsen, Underground Mr. Larsen stated they are in agreement with
Coordinator, Pacific Telephone the adoption of J Street as the next under-
grounding project. The telephone company
will need the same amount of time (approximately
1 year) as the San Diego Gas & Electric does
for the construction of this project.
Dick Hughes Mr. Hughes stated he based his estimate of
the cost as going up to East Park Lane.
Coordination with Port Councilman Hobel discussed comrdinating the
District project west of Interstate 5 with that of the
Port District.
EXECUTIVE SESSION It was moved by Councilman Scott~ seconded by
Councilman Hyde and unanimously carried that
the Council adjourn to Executive Session for
personnel reasons.
'~" Zone for entrances It was moved by Councilman Hyda~ seconded by
to City Councilman Scott, and unanimously carried
that the Council direct the Planning Cormnission
to consider the desirability of applying the
'~" Zone classification for each of the major
entrances to the City from Interstate 5 to
Broadway. These entrances are "E", "H", "J",
"L", and Palomar.
Executive Session The Council adjourned to Executive Session
at 5:38 p.m. and reconvened at 5:50 p.m.
APPOINTMENTS TO YOUTH It was moved by Councilman Egdahl, seconded
COMMISSION by Councilman Scott and unanimously carried
that the following appointments be made:
-4-
Richard Gac (reappointed)
Gayle McCandliss (reappointed)
Charles Daleo
Linda Key
John Craft
Tim Nader
Mark Fiocco
John Klock
Mayor Hamilton noted there was still one
appointment to be made to the Commission,
and the Council is seeking applications
for this.
ADJOURNMENT Mayor Hamilton adjourned the meeting at
5:52 p.m. to the meeting scheduled for
Tuesday, August 3, 1971, at 7 p.m.
· City Clerk'
-5-