Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 3 - Staff ReportCHOLA VISTA PLANNING �• i idl 1.11 SION5� AGENDA STATEMENT sem, r .:: ' Item: 3 Meeting Date: 12-14-2016 ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing: MPA16-0006 Consideration of a Master Precise Plan for Otay Ranch Village 3 North and a Portion of Village 4 APPLICANT: HomeFed Village III Master, LLC SUBMITTED BY: Janice Kluth, AICP — Senior Project Coordinator/Project Manager REVIEWED BY: Kelly Broughton, Development Services Director INTRODUCTION The Otay Ranch Village 3 North and a Portion of Village 4 Sectional Planning Area (Village 3), located at Heritage Road and Main Street (Attachment 1), was amended- in December 2016 (Otay Ranch Village 3 North and a Portion of Village 4 Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan, et. al), with 1,597 housing units, Office and Industrial uses, Community Purpose Facilities, Open Space and Preserve, a Neighborhood Park and a School site on approximately 436 acres of land. At the center of Village 3 is the Village Core — an attractive, walkable area that provides social, public service, neighborhood shopping, recreation and community activities. The Applicant and Owner of the property, HomeFed Village III Master, LLC, have prepared a Master Precise Plan that serves as design guidelines for the Village Core. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Director of Development Services has reviewed the proposed activity for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the activity was adequately covered in previously adopted/certified Final Environmental Impact Report for the Otay Ranch University Villages Project - (FEIR 13-01). Therefore, no additional environmental review is required. ti OCK1101105 10401 MIN N 1110 That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution MPA 16-0006 Planning Commission December 14, 2016 Item 3 Page No, 2 DISCUSSION _. Master Precise Plan A new Master Precise Plan (MPP) for Village 3 is required by the Village 3 SPA Plan (PC District Regulations, IV.E). The MPP provides the `entitlement bridge' linking the approved policies and land use designations of the Village 3 SPA/Village Design Plan with subsequent project -level approvals within Village 3's Village Core area. It serves as a framework document by which future individual Design Review applications may be evaluated for compliance with the approved MPP concepts that encompass streetscape and landscape design, signs, and architectural and lighting guidelines. The MPP supplements the approved Village Design Plan. It provides design direction and establishes a detailed framework for building design and siting; pedestrian/vehicle/transit access; urban character/architecture/landscape architecture; and lighting/signage/street furnishings. It contains specific mandatory criteria and general design recommendations for establishing a unifying design theme in Village 3 and for achieving the planning area's intended character and use mix. The MPP provisions are intended to ensure that the Village Core for Village 3 is developed as a diverse urban center in a walkable urban framework with a quality public realm. It promotes an active community that is bike- and pedestrian -friendly and offers diverse amenities. An Agrarian theme with Farmhouse and Ranch style architecture links the entire project together. This modern design with cleaner lines emphasizes building massing, interlocking volumes (i.e. scale), a mixture of materials on primary facades, and a strong connection to the outdoors. Separate design checklists are included for each of the Mixed Use, Multi -Family and Single Family Residential areas. Village Design Plan The Village Design Plan was recently amended to "brand" Village 3. The historical agricultural use of the land within Otay Ranch is the inspiration for the agrarian theme. Thematic architecture includes Transitional Spanish, Farmhouse and Ranch styles, interpreted in a contemporary way. Simple forms with an earth -toned palette comprised of colored stucco, stone, clay tile and wood accents compliment the architectural theme. The Village Core, with its mix of land uses, will allow for variety but maintains a strong basis in Farmhouse and Ranch architecture. Community Purpose Facility The Applicant will designate 0.94 acres of land and construct a 10,000 SF building within the Village Core for a Community Purpose Facility. Some of the permitted uses for the facility include a school, a daycare, a church, a non-profit office, etc. The Applicant is currently working with the YMCA to design a daycare facility on the site. Affordable Housing Plan Affordable Housing for Village 3 will be located in the Village Core, close to services, the Neighborhood Park, the School, and shopping. Planning Commission December 14, 2016 Item 3 Page No. 3 DECISION-MAIKER CONFLICTS Staff has reviewed the property holdings of the Planning Commission and has found no property holdings within 500 feet of the boundaries of the property which is the subject of this action. Consequently, this item does not present a disqualifying real property related financial conflict of interest under California Code of Regulations Title 2, Section. 18702.2(a)(11), for purposes of the Political Reform Act (Cal. Gov't Code 87100, et seq.). Staff is not independently aware, nor has staff been informed by any Planning Commission member, of any other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision -maker conflict of interest in this matter. CONCLUSION The MPP guides development of the GDP -required Village Core, providing higher -density mixed-use residential uses located proximate to the Neighborhood Park, the School Site, and to ancillary retail commercial uses. The MPP is a component of the Village 3 implementation package which includes the SPA Plan, Planned Community (PC) District Regulations, Village Design Plan, and other documents. The MPP implements pedestrian -oriented design, fosters Smart Growth, and provides site-specific detail for implementing the goats, objectives and policies established by the Otay Ranch GDP and the Chula Vista General Plan. FISCAL IMPACT: All application fees and processing costs are borne by the Applicant, resulting in no net impact to the General Fund or the Development Services Fund. Attachments 1. Locator Map 2. Master Precise Plan 3. Planning Commission Resolution MPA16-0006 Prepared hy: Janice Kluth, AICP, Project Manager