The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutReso 2016-168 RESOLUTION NO. 2016-168 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUI�'CIL OF THE C[TY OF CHLJLA VISTA APPROVING CONSTRUCTIOI�' CHAt�'GE ORDERS FOR SLF IV-A4ILLENIA. LLC FOR THE CONSTRUCT]ON OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL ID4PROVEMEI�'TS II�' THE MILLENIA PROJECT AND PROVIDII�'G TRANSPORTATIO\ DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE AI�'D TRAFF[C SIGI�'AL FEE CREDIT FOR ELIGIBLE EXPEI�'SES R'�I-IEREAS. SLF IV-Millenia. LLC (De�eloper)_ the ow�ners of the Millenia project have constructed a number of vaffic signals and portions of future traffic signals within the Millenia project and �+�ill construct other sienals and portions of signals as part of the remaining phases of development in the project: and R'HEREAS. the De��eloper has submitted t��o reimbursement requests to the Citv: Request =1 in the amount of 5280,276.69 for Eastlal:e ParkH-ay at Stvlus Street (location #9) and at the Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Guide�va�� (location '.`li) and Request #Z in the amount of 591.468 for BRT comdor signals at Orion Avenue/\'orth Drive�va�� (location ;=10) and Solstice Street (location �11); and WHEREAS, the Resolution reimburses the developer b}� pro��iding de��elopment fee credit for elieible traffic signal ��ork and appurtenances throush the City`s Transportation Development lmpact Fee (TDIF) Proeram and the Cih-`s Traffic�Signal Impact Fee Program; and V�'HEREAS, in accordance ��ith the Chula Vista TDIF Program, traffic sienals on major road�vavs identified �i�ithin the TDIF program, aze eligible for TDIF credit once the City has audited the expenses; and WHEREAS. if the signal is not on a TDIF road��ay. eligible expenses can be credited through the Traffic Signal Impact Fee Program: and WHEREAS, as part of the implementation of the City's TDIF and Traffic Signal Impact Fee Programs, staff evaluates reimbursement requests from de��elopers in the Cit�� to ensure that all costs aze qualif}ine costs under the Cit��'s respective fee proerams; and �1'HEREAS. in accordance ��ith the TDIF policy, since Eastlake Park��ay is a TDIF facilit�� and Stylus Sveet is not, the reimbursement of TD[F eligible expenses will be split at �0% TDIF and �0% Traffic Signal Impact Fee since half of the intersection approaches are on a TDIF facilit��: and \VHEREAS, the e�penses related to the BR7� Transit Guide�va}� are not TDIF elieible and �ti�ill be credited onlv throu�h the Traffic Si�nal Impact Fee Program; and Resolution No. 2016-168 Page No. 2 WHEREAS, the signal at Eastlake Parkway/Srylus Street (location #9) was quoted a price of$201,000 plus a change order for $826.69 for traffic signal equipment related to wiring and a signal controller (Eahibit 1) and the same exhibit refers to two bid items, totaling $66,000 (Bid Items #4 & #5); for $45,000 and $21;000, respectively for undergrounding conduit to cross the BRT transit guideway plus foundation work at the Stylus Street location for a total construction cost of$267.826.69: and WHEREAS; there are also engineering costs of$10,975.00 related to this work; as such, the total reimbursement sought b}� the Developer for Request#1 is $278,801.69; and WHEREAS, the City's policies for reimbursement require that all projects be competitively bid and that any project ��ith a change order eaceeding $50,000 be brought to the Citv Council for approval and reimbursement Request #1 is a change order which was added by the de��eloper to an eaisting, competitively bid Millenia signal contract; and WHEREAS, the signal modification at the intersection of Eastlake Parkwa}�/Stylus Street (]ocation #9) is also in very close proximity to the signal with the BRT Guide��ay (location #]3) and as such, both signalized locations aze operating as one larger intersection with additional signal equipment necessary for the two locations; and WHEREAS; based on the above, any BRT related underground equipment for sienal systems which are being installed in ad��ance of the BRT system operating will be reimbursed via the Traffic Signal Impact Fee; and WHEREAS, although the Developer submitted expenses totaling $278;801.69, for signal #9, it should be noted that, based on the cost of comparable signals, staff recommends reimbursement for the construction costs of the traffic signal at Eastlake Parkway/St}�lus Street (location # 9) in the amount of$206,975 because afrer careful review, staff found this amount to be consistent with other similarly configured signals in Millenia; and WHEREAS; the $206,97� reimbursement for location #9 shall be $103,487 in credit from the TD[F Program and $103;488 in credit from the Traffic Signal Impact Fee Program; and WHGREAS, based on the above, the total eligible reimbursement total for Request #1 will be $206,97�; and WHEREAS, the Developer's Request #2 is for reimbursement of signal related expenses on the Bus Rapid Transit corridor signals at Orion Avenue/North Driveway (location #]0) and Solstice Street (location #11); and WHEREAS, as part of the construction of the planned streets in Millenia, the developers are required, pursuant to a specific mitigation measure in tlie project Environmental Impact Report (GIR), to place conduits along Yhe corridor, not just at intersections, this requirement is intended to facilitate the fumre construction of BRT corridor traffic signals by SANDAG and due to the fact that the de��eloproent phasing and street construction is often well in advance of SANDAG's planned ser��icc, SANDAG �n�ill not reimburse the Developer for those future facilities early: and Resolution?�'o. 2016-168 Pa�e?�'o. 3 V�%HEREAS; should the Developer have ti�anted to preserve their rieht to future reimbursement, the} ��ould ha��e had to publich� bid, at pre��ailine wa2e rates, the full street impro��ements; which would ha��e resulted in cost increases to the Developer ��ell in e�cess of the requested reimbursement amounts; and A'HEREAS, it is in the public`s best interest to have the conduit installed N•ith the initial street infrastncture now in order to avoid ha��ins the street pa��ement section trenched in the future ��hen BRT sen•ice is planned and the traffic sienals are needed since it is more cost effective and less disruptive to the public to install these facilities now and the conduit �vhich is placed ui11 be o�ned b}� the City and a�ailable for the Cit�� s use, ��hich could indude placing infrastructure needed to support the Smart Cities Initiati��e and signal s��stems communications; and �'�'HEREAS. the Cit}� can pursue reimbursement from SA\'DAG for use of the conduits ��hen SA?�'DAG completes the BRT signal construction; and A'HEREAS, the De��eloper is requesting reimbursement for t�vo sienalized intersections needed for the BRT sen�ice ��hich includes 5�3.2�43 for intersection #10 and �38?2� for intersection .'—.`1L for a total reimbursement request of �91.468 for engineerine, adminisvation - and construction costs: and W"HEREAS. anv future work related to these sienalized locations H�ill not be reimbursed bv the Cit�� of Chula Vista since the�� are needed yfor the BRT service so no additional reimbursement requests ��ill be accepted for these hao intersections as they �+�ill be completed and funded bv SANDAG: and R'HEREAS, staff is recommending the appro��al of the requested reimbursement "Request #2" in the amount of �91,468, to be allocated to the Traffic Sienal Impact Fee Program. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED b�� the Citv Counci] of the City of Chula Vista, that it herebv approves construction chanee orders for SLF IV-Millenia. LLC for the construction of traffic signal improvements in the Millenia project and pro��idine TranspoRation Development Impact Fee and Traffic Signal Impact Fee credit for eligible expenses. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED b�� the Citv Council of the Citv of Chula Vista, that it hereb�� approves Developer Reimbursement Request #1 in the amount of 5208,4�0 of H-hich �103,487 H�ill be credited from the Transponation De��elopment Impact Fee Pro�ram and �104,963 ��ill be credited from the Traffic Sienal Impact Fee Program. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED b�� the Cit�= Council of the Cit�� of Chula Vista. that it hereb�� approves De�'eloper Reimbursement Request Y2 in the amount of�91,468 credited from the Traffic Signal Impact Fee Program. Resolution No. ZO16-]68 PaRe No. 4 Presented by Approved as to form by �,�,� (��-�--- ` �j Richard A Hopkins G en R. oogins 1 ��0 Director of Public Works Ci �y A�t rney �-� PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, California, this 9th day of August 2016 by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers: Bensoussan, McCann, Miesen, and Salas NAYS: Councilmembers: None ABSENT: Councilmembers: Aguilar . ��=� Mary las, Mayor ATTEST: Donna R. Norris. MC. Citv Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) CITY OF CHULA VISTA ) 1; Donna R. Norris, City Clerk of Chula Vista; California, do hereby certify that the foregoine Resolution No. 2016-168 was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting of the Chula Vista City Council held on the 9th day of August 2016. Executed this 9th day of August 2016. �� , ,�,�,� Donna R. Nonis. CMC. Citv Clerk Resolution No. 2016-168 Pase No. � Eahibit 1 - ' Sel�.t�e�ic,lnc . ��= ��-:. �' � P.II.Bos iT7> � <�� Poway,CA 92075 SE LEC T T:613A50-6D60 evecrn�c�rcc. ll�ert5e No.297fi,id F:6191b4�E➢E9 � fUril i6,2(J1S � , � � Aitenifon: Ke,l Saeeton REVIStOM�2 . RE: SRT gultleavay At Solstice/ � — easUake pkvry et Stylus street SEI QUOTE NO.: Bid T2ckar a 13-00492 ' I BI�DATE: "4hi6720'14 QUOTE VALJD FDR 30 DAY5 VJe xre plsase9 to oftar for}rour consida�lon our proposal for the electrical�wrk req�ared o�itie refarer�:,6 j � orolecL Our proposal is in accorrlance Wlth ine terms and wndrtlons as s*aLd h the Cordrax��cumerts,a�d Inc7udss the rmrK reqt�red for provtding Lhe elecGkal sytam as stiatm on the p.�ovid_d d2vAngs. � . . jI6NkL'w 1 ' O?'�P 6�D ITEM DESCPRIPTION QUANTITY I UNR S EXTEhSION . .(,�(� '1 BRT�SGstice Undayrtxmd 1 (.S S�S.00O.OU 5 zs,000.vo � f ^ Eesl7eJce Pkwy aLl Siylus Street � 3 ' (vOL� 4 Underground � LS 545,0�0_00 S d5.000.00 � � � �oD o 5 °�ke Pkxy @ S:SAus Streei I � LS I '��,floo.00 s zi,000.co 1 3 Founda'.bns � Fsstlak=Pk�ry @ SryWs 5seet T.S. � �� 6 eqtripment,vme,contrvRer,(xb�ve 'I tS $201,000_DD 5 207,ODO.tYJ- � ' grounc) � ITOTAI I 8T95.00U_00 ': No.Addendum notec:NONE Ctartflwtlons: 5 Includes irafP.c prY+nl for our wrlc onty,t�sed on most recerrt ediF'r..r,oi M'ATCH"msnual. � 2 Includes cortstrvctlon�ate>10 to provtde arid Enstali 12-9"conCults for RAiS� � Communl�aHore and Chuta Vista communicattons per drawing 120'16-02 provided by _ ; McMi(fm dated 10/27t73.Price of duet6ank a included for the crassings only,Selec! � � ElectrtC Wlil'stub up'and cap aanduits�crgraund for future corttractor to fnt=�cept " � ExcWdesanyVaulffi. � � � 3 �is pmposal is based on ali+•rork being prJfofined on ssaigh*.tUne,bes5d on a normal 6hour � worktlzy,46hour per week 6asis. No affc�.tiance Is indud�for erry ovzttlme. � 4 'czcludes Bond � 5 This p�ice ls hasetl upon Setect ElecLic,l�c.parfa-ming ALL the wack/blc Ifems Irh_d , above If items are spiH oul,then additional pNcing wll need[o be esFaSlisM3 .� 6 Oemo oroW.iec 2s Safe�J°a�y.