HomeMy WebLinkAbout2016-08-09 Agenda Packet f declue unAer pen�lry of perjury chii I am employed
by the City of Chula Vista in the o�ce of the City Clerk
ud thu I posted the document�ccordin�w Brown Act
requircments.
Dazed: � �f 1G Sip�ed: �-(-
�i
cm oF
���� CHULA VISTA
A ������i�
/ `
�
Mary Casillas Salas, Mayor
PaVicia Aguilar, Councilmember Gary Halbert. City Manager
Pamela Bensoussan, Councilmember Glen R. Googins, City Attomey
John McCann, Coundlmember ponna R. Nortis, City Ckrk
Steve Miesen, Councilmember
Tuesday, August 9, 2016 5:00 PM Council Chambers
276 4th Avenue, Building A
Chula Vista, CA 91910
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL:
Councilmembers Aguilar. 8ensoussan. McCann, Miesen and Mayor Casillas Salas
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG AND MOMENT OF SILENCE
SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY
A. 16-0365 OATH OF OFFICE
Amy Reeve, Civil Service Commission
B. 16-0399 PRESENTATION BY THE CULTURAL ARTS COMMISSION
OF THE 2016 GAYLE MCCANDLISS ARTS AWARDS
CONSENT CALENDAR (Items 1 -7)
The Council will enact the Consent Calendar staH recommendations by one motion, without
discussion, unless a Councilmember, a member o! the public, or staff requests that an item
be removed for discussion. 1f you wish to speak on one of these items, please fil! out a
"Request to Speak" fomr (available in fhe lobby) and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the
meetrng. Items pulled from the Consent Calendar wil! be discussed immediately following
the Consent Calendar.
ay or cnw.wsr v.p.� anrMw on wmte
City Council Aganda August 9,2016
1. 16-0400 APPROVAL OF MINUTES of July 26 and August 2, 2016.
smra�w„m.�aao�: Council approve the minutes.
2. 16-0392 WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
A. Letter of resignation from Max Zaker effective August 2,
2016, Housing Commission.
B. Memorandum from Councilmember Aguilar requesting an
excused absence from the July 26, 2016 City Council
meeting.
swrrs«omm«�m�: Council accept the resignation and excuse the absence.
3. 1 27 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING AN AGREEMENT FOR
PREPARATION OF A PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIVITY AND
INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT PLAN BETWEEN
THE CITY OF CHULA. VISTA AND COLE 8 ASSOCIATES,
INC. AND APPROPRIATING $30,000 FROM THE
AVAILABLE BALANCE OF THE TRANSNET FUND TO CIP
GG222, "ASSET MANAGEMENT" (4/5 VOTE REQUIRED)
wP.ron«m Public Works DepaAment
em�tronm«m�HOncs: This activity is not a "Project" as defined under Section 15378 of the
Califomia Environmental Quality act State Guidelines, therefore,
pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental
review is required.
sunrt.comma�mnw�: Council adopt the resolution.
4. 16-0377 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF ONE
COMBINATION SEWER CLEANING TRUCK IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF
NATIONAL JOINT POWERS ALLIANCE CONTRACT
NUMBER 102811 AND THE ISSUANCE OF A PURCHASE
ORDER TO NATIONAL AUTO FLEET GROUP IN THE
AMOUNT OF $439,961
o.P.ro�.m: Public Works Department
Emironmanhl Noticr. TFIB activity is not a "ProjecC as defined under Section 15378 of the
California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore,
pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental
review is required.
smnae�w„m«�moo,,: Council adopt the resolution.
, cM or cnW.rau r.p.r Prirrroe on aqr�o�e
City Council Agenda Auguat9,2016
5. 16-0333 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING BIDS; AWARDING A
CONTRACT FOR THE "MAX FIELD PUMP STATION
RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT (CIP NO. SW278)" TO
JUST CONSTRUCTION, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF
$398,631; APPROPRIATING $320,000 FROM THE SEWER
FACILITY REPLACEMENT FUND TO CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SW278; AUTHORIZING THE
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS TO EXECUTE ALL
CHANGE ORDERS; AND AUTHORIZING THE
EXPENDITURE OF ALL AVAILABLE CONTINGENCY
FUNDS IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $60,000 (4/5
VOTE REQUIRED)
wparo�,.�e: Public Works Department
em�iaunarcall�ooce: Th2 Project qualifies for a Categorical Exemption pursuant to the
Califomia Environmental Qualily Act State Guidelines Section 15301
Class 1 (Existing Facilities) and/or Section 15303 Class 3 (New
Construction or Conversion of Small Structures).
sanrMommMwcw�: Council adopt the resolution.
6. 16-0358 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING CONSTRUCTION CHANGE
ORDERS FOR SLF IV-MILLENIA, LLC FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS
IN THE MILLENIA PROJECT AND PROVIDING
TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE AND
TRAFFIC SIGNAL FEE CREDIT FOR ELIGIBLE EXPENSES
ww.�r Public Works Department
e�.o�«ro�nox.: The adivity is not a "Project' as defined under Section 15378 of the
Califomia Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore,
pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental
review is required. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the activity was
adequately covered in previousy adopted/certified Final Second Tier
Environmental Impact Report, EIR 07-01 for Otay Ranch Eastem
Urban Center(EUC) Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan.
sorrrrecomme.wano�: Council adopt the resolution.
aeY o�enw.ru� v,y.� v,;mea�dveo,e
City Council Agenda Auguat 9,2076
7. 16-0374 RE50LUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA V15TA APPROVING THE FOURTH AMENDMENT
TO THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA AND ADVANTAGE SENTRY AND PROTECTION,
INC. TO PROVIDE TRANSPORTATION SERVICES FOR
PRISONERS, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO
EXECUTE THE SAME
o.paro�.M: Police Department
fmt�onm�nb/NOtic�: Th@ activity is not a "Project" as defined under Section 15378 of the
Califomia Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; therefore,
pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental
review is required.
sbnrracomma�mnon: Council adopt the resolution.
ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Persons speaking dunng Public Comments may address the Council on any subject matter
within ihe Council's jurisdictan thaf is not listed as an item on the agenda. State !aw
generaNy prohr6ds the Council Irom discussing or taking action on any issue not induded
on the agenda, but, if appropriate, the Counci! may schedule the topic /or future discussan
or reler the matter to staff. Comments are limited to three minutes.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
The following item(s) have been adveRised as public hearing(s) as requiied by law. 1f you
wish to speak on any item, please fill out a 'Request to Speak° form (available in the lobby)
and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting.
8. 1 14 CONSIDERATION OF APPROVING AN ADOENDUM TO
EIR 07-01 AND AMENDMENTS TO THE EASTERN URBAN
CENTER (EUC) SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA PLAN AND
FORM BASED CODE TO RELOCATE THE MILLENIA
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SITE, DELETE A PORTION OF
MONTAGE AVENUE, REVISE PARKING RATES AND
STANDARDS, AND CLARIFY THE APPROVAL PROCESS
FOR THE PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN, SUBSEQUENT
PARKING RATES, AND FUTURE STREET DELETIONS
Gky oI C1�uY Vlab P�p�/ Pnrrnd on 6Wl07�
City Council Agenda Auguat 9,2016
A. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CHULA VISTA CONSIDERING THE ADDENDUM (IS-15
-0003) TO EIR 07-01 AND APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO
THE EASTERN URBAN CENTER SECTIONAL PLANNING
AREA (SPA) PLAN AND ASSOCIATED REGULATORY
DOCUMENTS RELATING TO THE RELOCATION OF
MILLENIA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SITE AND DELETION
OF A PORTION OF MONTAGE AVENUE
B. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE EASTERN URBAN
CENTER PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT
REGULATIONS AND DESIGN PLAN (FORM BASED
CODE) FOR 207 ACRES OF LAND IN THE EASTERN
URBAN CENTER PORTION OF THE OTAY RANCH
RELATING TO THE RELOCATION OF THE MILLENIA
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SITE, DELETION OF A PORTION
OF MONTAGE AVENUE, REVISING THE PARKING RATES
AND STANDARDS AND CLARIFYING THE APPROVAL
PROCESS FOR THE PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN,
SUBSEQUENT PARKING RATES, AND FUTURE STREET
OELETIONS (FIRST READING)
n�.u�«�r Development Services Department
e�.�r.��«miran�s: The Project was adequately covered in previously adopted Final
Second Tier Environmental Impact Report, EIR 07-01 and only minor
technical changes were required; therefore Addendum IS-15-0003
has been prepared.
sbnmecomm«,e.uon: Council conduct the public hearing, adopt the resolution and place
the ordinance on first reading.
9. 16-0354 CONSIDERATION OF AN APPEAL BY BALDWIN & SONS
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S ACTION OF NO
DECISION DUE TO NOT ACHIEVING A MAJORITY VOTE
ON DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT DR15-0024 FOR A 78-UNIT
MULTI-FAMILY RESIOENTIAL PROJECT IN OTAY RANCH
VILLAGE TWO NEIGHBORHOOD R-176(b)
cny or cnw.wsa ny.s vn�ne oo wrto�e
City Cauncil Agenda August 9,2016
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING AN APPEAL FOR DESIGN
REVIEW PERMIT DR15-0024 TO CONSTRUCT A 78-UNIT
MULTI-FAMILY DUPLEX DEVELOPMENT WITH TWO-CAR
GARAGES, RECREATION AREAS, AND ASSOCIATED
OPEN SPACE ON 4.7 ACRES WITHIN THE OTAY RANCH
VILLAGE TWO, NEIGHBORHOOD R-176(b)
neP.,e�e�r Development Services Department
e�m�o�,«�m�,�: The Project was adequately covered in previously adoptedlcertified
Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (FSEIR 12-01) for
the Otay Ranch Village Two Comprehensive Sectional Planning
Area (SPA) Plan Amendment.
sunrr«,,,�me„wnw�: Council wnduct the public hearing and adopt the resolution.
CITY MANAGER'S REPORTS
MAYOR'S REPORTS
COUNCILMEMBERS' COMMENTS
CLOSED SESSION
Announcements o( acfions taken in CJosed Session shal! be made avaiJable by noon on
Wednesday following the Council Meeting at the City Attomey's o�ce in acco�dance with
the Ralph M. Brown Act(Govemment Code 54957.7J.
10. 16-0398 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING
EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT
CODE SECTION 54956.9 (d)(1)
Name of case: A) John Kilpatrick v. City of Chula Vista,
Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH), Case No.
2016040774; and
B) Karen R. Escobedo as Trustee of the Irving A. Escobedo
and Karen R. Escobedo Family Trust v. City of Chula Vista,
San Diego Superior Court , Case No .
37-2015-00007825-C U-PO-CTL.
ADJOURNMENT
to the Regulai City Council Meeting on August 16, 2016, at S:OO p m., in the Council
Chambers.
uy o�cnw.wrn a.v�e rnm.e en aevto+e
City Council Agenda Auguat 9,2016
Materials provided to the City Counci!related to any open-session dem on this agenda are available
lor publrc�eview at the City Cle�k's Of/lce, located in City Hall at 276 FouRh Avenue, 8uilding A,
during norma!business hours.
!n compliance with the
AMER/CANS W1TH DISABILITIES ACT
The City ol Chula Vista requests individuals who requiie special accommodations to access, attend,
and�oi paRicipate in a City meeting, adivity, or service, contad the City Cle�k's 011lce at(619)
691-5041(Califomia Re/ay Service is available for the hearing impaired by dialing 711)at leasf
foRy-eighf hours in advance o/fhe meeting.
Most Chula Vista City Council meetings, including public comments, ara video recorded and ai�ed live
on ATBT U-verse channef 99(throughout the County), on Cox Cable channe/24 (onty in ChWa Vista),
and online at www.chulavistaca.gov. Recortied meetings are also aired on Wednesdays at 7 p.m.
(both channels) and are archived on the City's website.
Sign up at www.chulavistaca.gov to�eceive email notfiications when City Council agendas are
published online.
ary o�cnw.wm r.o.� v.i�ew o�wrm�e
I
City of Chula Vista
Staff Report
File#:16-0365, Item#: A.
OATH OF OFFICE
Amy Reeve, Civil Service Commission
City of Chula VistaPage 1 of 1Printed on 8/4/2016
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 8
City of Chula Vista
Staff Report
File#:16-0399, Item#: B.
PRESENTATIONBYTHECULTURALARTSCOMMISSIONOFTHE2016GAYLEMCCANDLISS
ARTS AWARDS
City of Chula VistaPage 1 of 1Printed on 8/4/2016
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 9
City of Chula Vista
Staff Report
File#:16-0400, Item#: 1.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES of July 26 and August 2, 2016.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Council approve the minutes.
City of Chula VistaPage 1 of 1Printed on 8/4/2016
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 10
!"#$" %&'(") * (
+,, -."+ -& ,*"/"01($
C&,*@(! "D&'!"9; "94B;2344"5+
#&-6 '" %(78,1*
9:;"< %"=>,-&, "?& '@ -."=
%&'(") * ( " ="ABAB4
EFGHI=E"+FFCJKG"LM"CNF" JCO" LHK JI
=II"CL"LE0FE
!"#$% & '()! *+ ', -('. -*")/(# *+ ', -('. *+ -,"#$ 0(1'$ 2$1 /$## 3 '* *%3 % $' 4567 89:9 () ',
-*")/(# -,$:; %1< #*/$' 3 () -('. =$##< >?7 @*"%', A )" < -,"#$ 0(1'$< -$#(+*%)($9
ELII" =II3
!"#$%$&%'()% * **+ ,( !"#$%$&%'(-! + (+ .(/%0 12(-+2 '(-"%*%
51,*,- 3
!"#$%$&%'(34 "#+'(+ .(-+2 '( +*"##+*(5+#+*
=8*,- 3
#1* B% 1 )'5 -('. &$)$! % =$#; %'< -('. ''*%) . C**!()1< -('. -# %D E*%%(1< $)3 11(1'$)' -('. -# %D
F(! #*2
5IF0GF"LM"=IIFGJ=K F"CL"CNF"MI=G"=K0"+L+FKC"LM"PJIFK F
-*")/(#: :; % F )1*"11$) # 3 ', B# 3! *+ ## !($)/ 9
P5F J=I"LE0FEP"LM"CNF"0=O
6789:;:<= >?@ABA>@(>C(BD=(69E(?>F/()>@AB3(G3FF=H(?A<F5(
Q
5>CB)3FF(B=3-I5(JE3FACA 3BA>@(B>(KF3H(A@(3(@3BA>@3F(
D3-KA>@5DAK(A@(-=/C></,(><=?>@,(3E?E5B(6(BD<>E?D(;
G 8"'. &$.*% &( 1 ) % /*!)(H 3 ', I6J C*#3 F*)('$ 0$## . !(%#1 1*+';$## >6I7 ##KL'$% ' $: $)3 ',
8#$. %1 ()'%*3"/ 3 ', :1 #A 19
G 8"'. &$.*% &( 1 ) $#1* % /*!)(H 3 ', -,"#$ 0(1'$ L*"', B*). ##KL'$% 1*+';$## ' $: 2,* M"$#(+( 3 '*
8#$. () ', N*%#3 L %( 19
67899;;
K<=5=@B3BA>@()H(BD=( DEF3(GA5B3(>FH-KA (B<3A@A@?(
=R
=@B=<(>@(BD=(F> 3F(3BDF=B=5(LD>(LAFF()=(
<=K<=5=@BA@?(BD=(E@AB=/(5B3B=5(3B(BD=(M967(>FH-KA 5(
3@/(K3<3FH-KA 5(A@(<A>(/=(N3@=A<>
O:(#. -*P< % 8% 1 )'()! ', -,"#$ 0(1'$ Q#.:8(/ R%$()()! - )' %< !$A $ 8% 1 )'$'(*) *) ', #*/$#
$',# ' 1 2,* 2*"#3 /*:8 ' () ', >6I7 Q#.:8(/1 $)3 B$%$#.:8(/19
6789:M7
K<=5=@B3BA>@()H(<= H FA@?(5K= A3FA5B(N>=( >KK>F3(
?R
<=?3</A@?(BD=(E5=/(>AF(<= H FA@?(K<>?<3-I5(=--H(
3L3</8LA@@A@?( >--=< A3F5
/./#()! L8 /($#(1' -*88*#$ !$A $ 8% 1 )'$'(*) *) ', (' : $)3 8#$. 3 ', O::.K$2$%3 2())()!
/*:: %/($#19
#$%&!'(!#)*+ !,$-% !"
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 11
!" #&-6 '+,, -."+ -& ,*"/"01($ D&'!"9; "94B;
LKPFKC" =IFK0=E"SJ ,7*"B"/";T
-('. ''*%) . C**!()1 1'$' 3 ',$'< % !$%3()! S' : I< ', 8*#(/. 2$1 /*)1(1' )' 2(', ', ()' %(: 8*#(/. ',$'
', -*")/(# ,$3 8% A(*"1#. $3*8' 3< $)3 ',$' 2, ) ', )*:()$'(*) 8%*/ 11 2$1 % M"(% 3< ', )*:()$'(*)
8$8 %1 /*:8# ' 3 ;. ', -*")/(# 2 % 8";#(/ % /*%31 $)3 (:: 3($' #. $A$(#$;# +*% 8";#(/ % A( 2 $)3
/*:: )'9 = 1'$' 3 ',$'< % !$%3()! S' : 7< :()*% /,$)! 1 '* ', /*)'%$/' ,$3 ; ) 3(1'%(;"' 3 '* ',
-*")/(# $)3 2*"#3 ; ()/*%8*%$' 3 1,*"#3 ', (' : ; $3*8' 39
-('. ''*%) . C**!()1 1'$' 3 ',$' S' :1 T< 4< $)3 ? % M"(% 3 UV4 A*' *+ ', -*")/(# $)3 2*"#3 ) 3 '*
; /*)'()" 3 '* $ +"'"% : '()! *+ ', -*")/(#9
6789:7O
></A@3@ =(@>P(::Q9(>C(BD=( ABH(>C( DEF3(GA5B3(3//A@?(
BR
DEF3(GA5B3(-E@A AK3F( >/=( D3KB=<(MPR:,(3KK>A@B-=@B(
K<> =55(B>(CAFF(G3 3@ A=5(>@(BD=( ABH( >E@ AF(3@/(
5K= ACA=/( >--A55A>@5,(3@/(3-=@/A@?(5= BA>@5(MPMRP9R9(
3@/(MPO:P9R9(3 ></A@?FH(S5= >@/(<=3/A@?(3@/(3/>KBA>@T
E,6#77,-@,@"=6 #-3" #&-6 '"(@#U " %,"#1@ -(-6,R
6789:OU<=5>FEBA>@(@>P(M96786O;(>C(BD=( ABH( >E@ AF(>C(BD=( ABH(
9R
>C( DEF3(GA5B3(3KK<>GA@?(3(5>F=(5>E< =(KE< D35=(>C(
>@=(KA=< =(3=<A3F(F3//=<(B<E V(C<>-(KA=< =(
-3@EC3 BE<A@?(3@/(3(698H=3<(F=35=(KE< D35=(
3?<==-=@B(C><(BDA5(3 JEA5ABA>@()=BL==@(BD=( ABH(>C(
DEF3(GA5B3(3@/(NK-><?3@( D35=()3@V,(@P3P(3@/(
3EBD><AWA@?(BD=( ABH(-3@3?=<(B>(=X= EB=(BD=(
3?<==-=@B(3B(3@(A@B=<=5B(<3B=(->5B(C3G><3)F=(B>(BD=(
ABH,(@>B(B>(=X ==/(BD<==(K=< =@B
E,6#77,-@,@"=6 #-3" #&-6 '"(@#U " %,"1,*#'& #-R
S' : T 2$1 % :*A 3 +%*: ', -*)1 )' -$# )3$%9
6789M:6<=5>FEBA>@(@>P(M96786OU(>C(BD=( ABH( >E@ AF(>C(BD=( ABH(
<R
>C( DEF3(GA5B3(3KK<>GA@?(BD=(/<3CB(K3<V(-35B=<(KF3@(
C><(BD=(6PR683 <=(5>EBD(=35B(K3<V,(3(BE<@V=H(KE)FA (
@=A?D)><D>>/(K3<V,(3B(-AFF=@A3,(3@/(3KK<>GA@?(BD=(
K3<V(@3-=,(Y(><A>@(K3<VZ
E,6#77,-@,@"=6 #-3" #&-6 '"(@#U " %,"1,*#'& #-R
S' : 4 2$1 % :*A 3 +%*: ', -*)1 )' -$# )3$%9
<=5>FEBA>@(@>P(M96786R9(>C(BD=( ABH( >E@ AF(>C(BD=( ABH(
;RB;/4V<<
>C( DEF3(GA5B3(3KK<>GA@?(3@(3?<==-=@B()=BL==@(BD=(
ABH(>C( DEF3(GA5B3(3@/(B<A5B3<(B>(5EK=<GA5=(3@/(
3/-A@A5B=<(BD=(L><V=<5( >-K=@53BA>@( F3A-5(-3/=(
EK>@(BD=( ABH\[5(5=FC8A@5E<3@ =(L><V=<5( >-K=@53BA>@(
K<>?<3-
E,6#77,-@,@"=6 #-3" #&-6 '"(@#U " %,"1,*#'& #-R
#$%&!'(!#)*+ !,$-% !.
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 12
!" #&-6 '+,, -."+ -& ,*"/"01($ D&'!"9; "94B;
88%*A$# *+ ', -*)1 )' -$# )3$%
= CJLK3="7# #-"W(*"7(@,"8!" #&-6 '7,78,1"+6 (-- "*,6#-@,@"8!" #&-6 '7,78,1"
?,-*#&**(- " #"(UU1#>,"* ($$X*"1,6#77,-@( #-*"#-" %,"(8#>," #-*,- "
(',-@(1" ,7* "%,(@ -.*"1,(@ " ,Y "W( >,@R"C%,"7# #-"6(11 ,@"8!" %,"$#''#W -."
># ,3
:(8()% * **+ ,(-! + (+ .(-"%*%
O,*3
9(((
K#3
9(((
=8* ( -3
JCF+P"EF+L)F0"MEL+"CNF" LKPFKC" =IFK0=E
67896UR3P<=5>FEBA>@(>C(BD=( ABH( >E@ AF(>C(BD=( ABH(>C( DEF3(
VR
GA5B3(3EBD><AWA@?(BD=(F=GH(>C(-3XA-E-(5K= A3F(B3X=5(
C><(CA5 3F(H=3<(M967\\M96Q(LABDA@( >--E@ABH(C3 AFABA=5(
/A5B<A B5(UQ86,(UQ8M,(UQ8:,(U;86,(U;8M,(U;8:,(UU86,(UU8M,(M99986,(M996
86,(M9968M,(9Q8A,(9;8A,(9;8-,(9U8-,(668-,(6M8A,(6M8-,(6:8A,(6:8-,(3@/(6O
8-(3@/(/=F=?3BA@?(B>(BD=( ABH(-3@3?=<,(><(/=5A?@==,(
BD=(3EBD><ABH(B>(K<=K3<=(3@/(5E)-AB(3( =<BACA=/(FA5B(>C(
3FF(K3< =F5(5E)N= B(B>(BD=(5K= A3F(B3X,(A@ FE/A@?(BD=(
3->E@B(>C(BD=(B3X,(B>(BD=( >E@BH(3E/AB><
)P<=5>FEBA>@(>C(BD=( ABH( >E@ AF(>C(BD=( ABH(>C( DEF3(
GA5B3(3EBD><AWA@?(BD=(F=GH(>C(-3XA-E-(5K= A3F(B3X=5(
C><(CA5 3F(H=3<(M967\\M96Q(LABDA@( >--E@ABH(C3 AFABA=5(
/A5B<A B5(978A,(3@/(9Q8-(3@/(/=F=?3BA@?(B>(BD=( ABH(
-3@3?=<,(><(DA5(/=5A?@==,(BD=(3EBD><ABH(B>(K<=K3<=(
3@/(5E)-AB(3( =<BACA=/(FA5B(>C(3FF(K3< =F5(5E)N= B(B>(
BD=(5K= A3F(B3X,(A@ FE/A@?(BD=(3->E@B(>C(BD=(B3X,(B>(BD=(
>E@BH(3E/AB><
S' : T 2$1 /*)'()" 3 '* ', : '()! *+ "!"1' >< >6I79
9
6789:O:3P<=5>FEBA>@(>C(BD=( ABH( >E@ AF(>C(BD=( ABH(>C( DEF3(
2R
GA5B3(3 =KBA@?(\]M:,999(C<>-(BD=( >E@BH(>C(53@(/A=?>(
3FAC><@A3(A/=@BACA 3BA>@(K<>?<3-,(3//A@?(>@=(F3B=@B(
K<A@B(=X3-A@=<(B>(BD=(3EBD><AW=/(5B3CCA@?(>C(BD=(
K>FA =(/=K3<B-=@B,(3@/(3KK<>K<A3BA@?(53A/(CE@/5(B>(
BD=(CA5 3F(H=3<(M967\\M96Q(K>FA =(/=K3<B-=@B()E/?=B(SO\\R(
G>B=(<=JEA<=/T
)P<=5>FEBA>@(>C(BD=( ABH( >E@ AF(>C(BD=( ABH(>C( DEF3(
GA5B3(3-=@/A@?(BD=( >-K=@53BA>@(5 D=/EF=(B>(<=CF= B(
BD=( ><<= B(53F3<H(C><(5=@A><(F3B=@B(K<A@B(=X3-A@=<
#$%&!'(!#)*+ !,$-% !/
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 13
!" #&-6 '+,, -."+ -& ,*"/"01($ D&'!"9; "94B;
P<=5>FEBA>@(>C(BD=( ABH( >E@ AF(>C(BD=( ABH(>C( DEF3(
GA5B3(3KK<>GA@?(BD=(<=GA5=/(CA5 3F(H=3<(M967\\M96Q(
>-K=@53BA>@(5 D=/EF=(=CC= BAG=(3E?E5B(R,(M967,(35(
<=JEA<=/()H( 3FAC><@A3( >/=(>C(<=?EF3BA>@5,(BABF=(M,(
5= BA>@(RQ9PR
S' : 4 2$1 /*)'()" 3 '* ', : '()! *+ "!"1' >< >6I79
= CJLK3="7# #-"W(*"7(@,"8!" #&-6 '7,78,1"+6 (-- "*,6#-@,@"8!" #&-6 '7,78,1"
?,-*#&**(- " %( "J ,7*"V"(-@"2"8,"6#- -&,@" #" %,"7,, -."#$"=&.&* "9 "94B;R"
C%,"7# #-"6(11 ,@"8!" %,"$#''#W -."># ,3
:(8()% * **+ ,(-! + (+ .(-"%*%
O,*3
9(((
K#3
9(((
=8* ( -3
5H?IJ " L++FKCP
R, % 2 % )*) 9
5H?IJ "NF=EJKGP
67896UO >@5A/=<3BA>@(>C(B=5BA->@H(C><(BD=(CA5 3F(H=3<(
:R
M967\\M96Q(F=GH(>C(355=55-=@B5(3@/( >FF= BA>@(3?3A@5B(
BD>5=(355=55-=@B5(C><( =<B3A@(>K=@(5K3 =(3@/(
-3A@B=@3@ =(/A5B<A B5(
3P<=5>FEBA>@(>C(BD=( ABH( >E@ AF(>C(BD=( ABH(>C( DEF3(
GA5B3(F=GHA@?(BD=(355=55-=@B5(3@/( >FF= BA)F=5(C><(
BD=(CA5 3F(H=3<(M967\\M96Q(C><(>K=@(5K3 =(/A5B<A B5(M(
BD<>E?D(Q,(U,(66,(6O,(6R,(6Q,(6;,(M9(SW>@=5(6,(M,(O,(R,(7,(;T,(M:,(MO,(
M7,(:6,(::,(=35BF3V=(-3A@B=@3@ =(/A5B<A B(@>(6(SW>@=5(),( ,(
3@/(/T,(3@/()3H()>EF=G3</(-3A@B=@3@ =(/A5B<A B
)P<=5>FEBA>@(>C(BD=( ABH( >E@ AF(>C(BD=( ABH(>C( DEF3(
GA5B3(F=GHA@?(BD=(355=55-=@B5(3@/( >FF= BA)F=5(C><(
BD=(CA5 3F(H=3<(M967\\M96Q(C><(>K=@(5K3 =(-3A@B=@3@ =(
/A5B<A B(@>P(6
P<=5>FEBA>@(>C(BD=( ABH( >E@ AF(>C(BD=( ABH(>C( DEF3(
GA5B3(F=GHA@?(BD=(355=55-=@B5(3@/( >FF= BA)F=5(C><(
BD=(CA5 3F(H=3<(M967\\M96Q(C><(>K=@(5K3 =(/A5B<A B5(;(3@/(
M9(SW>@=5(:,(Q,(3@/(UT
/P<=5>FEBA>@(>C(BD=( ABH( >E@ AF(>C(BD=( ABH(>C( DEF3(
GA5B3(F=GHA@?(BD=(355=55-=@B5(3@/( >FF= BA)F=5(C><(
BD=(CA5 3F(H=3<(M967\\M96Q(C><(>K=@(5K3 =(/A5B<A B5(69,(
=35BF3V=(-3A@B=@3@ =(/A5B<A B(@>(6(SW>@=(=T,(3@/(B>L@(
=@B<=(-3A@B=@3@ =(/A5B<A B
#$%&!'(!#)*+ !,$-% !0
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 14
!" #&-6 '+,, -."+ -& ,*"/"01($ D&'!"9; "94B;
=P<=5>FEBA>@(>C(BD=( ABH( >E@ AF(>C(BD=( ABH(>C( DEF3(
GA5B3(F=GHA@?(BD=(355=55-=@B5(3@/( >FF= BA)F=5(C><(
BD=(CA5 3F(H=3<(M967\\M96Q(C><(>K=@(5K3 =(/A5B<A B(
=35BF3V=(-3A@B=@3@ =(/A5B<A B(@>(6(SW>@=(3T
((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((P
E*'(/ *+ ', , $%()! 2$1 !(A ) () $//*%3$)/ 2(', # !$# % M"(% : )'1< $)3 ', , $%()! 2$1 , #3 *) ',
3$' $)3 )* $%#( % ',$) ', '(: 18 /(+( 3 () ', )*'(/ 9
G 8"'. &$.*% &( 1 ) *8 ) 3 ', 8";#(/ , $%()! $)3 /*)'()" 3 ', (' : '* "!"1' >< >6I79
= CJLK3="7# #-"W(*"7(@,"8!" #&-6 '7,78,1"+6 (-- "*,6#-@,@"8!" #&-6 '7,78,1"
?,-*#&**(- " %( "J ,7":"8,"6#- -&,@" #" %,"7,, -."#$"=&.&* "9 "94B;R"C%,"
7# #-"6(11 ,@"8!" %,"$#''#W -."># ,3
:(8()% * **+ ,(-! + (+ .(-"%*%
O,*3
9(((
K#3
9(((
=8* ( -3
JCO"+=K=GFEZP"EF5LECP
R, % 2 % )*) 9
+=OLEZP"EF5LECP
R, % 2 % )*) 9
LHK JI+F+?FEPZ" L++FKCP
-*")/(#: :; % &/-$)) P8% 11 3 $88% /($'(*) '* ', -('. &$)$! %< @()$)/ G 8$%': )'< $)3
@(% +(!,' %1 +*% ', (% 2*%D '* /*:8# ' ', #$33 % '%"/D $!% : )' $)3 ;%()! ', '%"/D *)#() 9
-*")/(#: :; % F )1*"11$) $))*")/ 3 ', "8/*:()! =$%;*%@ 1' A )'9
G 8"'. &$.*% &( 1 ) 18*D % !$%3()! ,(1 $'' )3$)/ $' $ % / )' &"#'(8# L8 /( 1 -*)1 %A$'(*)
B%*!%$: A )' $' &*")'$() =$2D B$%D9
=0DLHEK+FKC
' 45U> 89:9< G 8"'. &$.*% &( 1 ) $3W*"%) 3 ', : '()! '* ', !"#$% -('. -*")/(# & '()! *)
"!"1' >< >6I7< $' 4566 89:9< () ', -*")/(# -,$:; %19
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
V%''2(VP()"4%# _,(3**"*1+ 1( "12( #%'`
#$%&!'(!#)*+ !,$-% !1
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 15
!"#$" %&'(") * (
+,, -."+ -& ,*"/"01($
C&,*@(! "=&.&* "9 "94B;2344"5+
#&-6 '" %(78,1*
9:;"< %"=>,-&, "?& '@ -."=
%&'(") * ( " ="ABAB4
DEFGH=D"+EECIJF"KL"CME" ICN" KGJ IH
=HH"CK"KD0ED
!"#$% & '()! *+ ', -('. -*")/(# *+ ', -('. *+ -,"#$ 0(1'$ 2$1 /$## 3 '* *%3 % $' 4567 89:9 () ',
-*")/(# -,$:; %1< #*/$' 3 () -('. =$##< >7? @*"%', A )" < -,"#$ 0(1'$< -$#(+*%)($9
DKHH" =HH3
!"#$%$&%'()* "#+',( !"#$%$&%'(-% . ..+ ,( !"#$%$&%'(/! + ,(
51,*,- 3
0%1 23(/+3 '(/"%.% (+ 4(/+3 '( +."##+.(5+#+.
#1* B% 1 )'5 -('. &$)$! % =$#; %'< -('. ''*%) . C**!()1< -('. -# %D E*%%(1< $)3 11(1'$)' -('. -# %D
F(! #*2
5HE0FE"KL"=HHEFI=J E"CK"CME"LH=F"=J0"+K+EJC"KL"OIHEJ E
&$.*% -$1(##$1 G$#$1 8$(3 '%(;"' '* +$## ) G$) H( !* B*#(/ I++(/ % $)3 -,"#$ 0(1'$ % 1(3 )'< J*)$',$)
H C"K:$) $)3 # 3 ', B# 3! *+ ## !($)/ 9
O5E I=H"KD0EDO"KL"CME"0=N
6789:;9<)=>5(<?(<??@ A
=P
B% ."%(C'%* '" ,(D+'E.(+ 4(B%!'%+2" ( $$".."
/+F(G+E%',(D#+ " *( $$".."
-('. -# %D E*%%(1 $3:()(1' % 3 ', *$',1 *+ *++(/ '* -*::(11(*) %1 C% !*%(* $)3 L$D %< $)3
-*")/(#: :; % F )1*"11$) 8% 1 )' 3 ', : 2(', / %'(+(/$' 1 *+ $88*()': )'9
6789::75<H=>( <HI=J(A <I</@ (0AKAL<D/AI=( <HI @L()I0(=>A(
?P
A <I</@ (0AKAL<D/AI=(0AD)B=/AI=(DB<H0LJ(
@I=B<0H A5(-<-(M<AB-AB()I0(-)A(5J5=A/5(=<(=>A( @=J(<?(
>HL)(K@5=)
M/*)*:(/ H A #*8: )' H(% /'*% -%*/D '' 18*D % !$%3()! F M G.1' :1 G$) H( !* G,(8 8$(%9 -()3.
C*:88 %NC%$A 1< % 8% 1 )'()! ', G*"', -*")'. M/*)*:(/ H A #*8: )' -*")/(#< ()'%*3"/ 3 F*;
O* %; %< C ) %$# &$)$! % $)3 0(/ B% 1(3 )' *+ F M G.1' :1< 2,* !$A $ 8% 1 )'$'(*) % !$%3()! ',
*%!$)(K$'(*)9 &$.*% -$1(##$1 G$#$1 % $3 ', 8%*/#$:$'(*) $)3 H 8"'. &$.*% &( 1 ) 8% 1 )' 3 (' '* &%9
O* %; %9
KJOEJC" =HEJ0=D"QI ,7*"B"/";R
-*")/(#: :; % &/-$)) 1'$' 3 , 2*"#3 $;1'$() +%*: A*'()! *) P' : QF 3" '* $ 8*' )'($#
8%*8 %'.N% #$' 3 /*)+#(/' *+ ()' % 1'9
6789:76)DDB<K)L(<?(/@IH=A5( N(O #3(6P,(6Q,(+ 4(6R,(P967S
BP
D,6#77,-@,@"=6 #-3" #&-6 '"(SS1#>," %,"7 -& ,*P
#$%&!'(!#)*+ !,$-% !"
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 16
!" #&-6 '+,, -."+ -& ,*"/"01($ =&.&* "9 "94B;
6789:7:
<B0@I)I A(I<S(::T6(<?(=>A( @=J(<?( >HL)(K@5=)()00@IC(
9P
>)D=AB(:S::(=<(=@=LA(:(<?(=>A( >HL)(K@5=)(/HI@ @D)L(
<0A(=<(A5=)-L@5>()(=A/D<B)BJ(<IA8>)L?( AI=(CAIAB)L(
=B)I5) =@<I5()I0(H5A(=)U(=<(-A()0/@I@5=ABA0(-J(=>A(
5=)=A(-<)B0(<?(AVH)L@G)=@<I(@I LH0@IC(DB<K@5@<I5(?<B(
@=@GAI5W(<KAB5@C>=()I() <HI=)-@L@=J(X5A <I0(BA)0@IC(
)I0()0<D=@<IY(XQZ\[(K<=A(BAVH@BA0Y
D,6#77,-@,@"=6 #-3" #&-6 '"(@#S " %,"#1@ -(-6,P
67896R\[)SBA5<LH=@<I(I<S(P96786\[6(<?(=>A( @=J( <HI @L(<?(=>A(
TP
@=J(<?( >HL)(K@5=)()H=><B@G@IC(=>A(LAKJ(<?(/)U@/H/(
5DA @)L(=)UA5(?<B(?@5 )L(JA)B(P967ZP96T(\\@=>@I(
<//HI@=J(?) @L@=@A5(0@5=B@ =5(RT86,(RT8P,(RT8:,(R;86,(R;8P,(R;8
:,(RR86,(RR8P,(P99986,(P99686,(P9968P,(9T8@,(9;8@,(9;8/,(9R8/,(668/,(6P
8@,(6P8/,(6:8@,(6:8/,()I0(6Q8/()I0(0ALAC)=@IC(=<(=>A( @=J(
/)I)CAB,(<B(0A5@CIAA,(=>A()H=><B@=J(=<(DBAD)BA()I0(
5H-/@=()( AB=@?@A0(L@5=(<?()LL(D)B AL5(5H-OA =(=<(=>A(
5DA @)L(=)U,(@I LH0@IC(=>A()/<HI=(<?(=>A(=)U,(=<(=>A(
<HI=J()H0@=<B
-SBA5<LH=@<I(I<S(P96786\[P(<?(=>A( @=J( <HI @L(<?(=>A(
@=J(<?( >HL)(K@5=)()H=><B@G@IC(=>A(LAKJ(<?(/)U@/H/(
5DA @)L(=)UA5(?<B(?@5 )L(JA)B(P967ZP96T(\\@=>@I(
<//HI@=J(?) @L@=@A5(0@5=B@ =5(978@,()I0(9T8/()I0(
0ALAC)=@IC(=<(=>A( @=J(/)I)CAB,(<B(>@5(0A5@CIAA,(=>A(
)H=><B@=J(=<(DBAD)BA()I0(5H-/@=()( AB=@?@A0(L@5=(<?()LL(
D)B AL5(5H-OA =(=<(=>A(5DA @)L(=)U,(@I LH0@IC(=>A(
)/<HI=(<?(=>A(=)U,(=<(=>A( <HI=J()H0@=<B
D,6#77,-@,@"=6 #-3" #&-6 '"(@#S " %,"1,*#'& #-*P
6789PT\[)SBA5<LH=@<I(I<S(P96786\[:(<?(=>A( @=J( <HI @L(<?(=>A(
<P
@=J(<?( >HL)(K@5=)()0<D=@IC()(/)D(5><\\@IC(=>A(
-<HI0)B@A5(<?(=>A(=ABB@=<BJ(DB<D<5A0(=<(-A(@I LH0A0(
@I( <//HI@=J(?) @L@=@A5(0@5=B@ =(I<S(678@(X/@LLAI@)Y()I0(=>A(
@/DB<KA/AI=()BA)5(=>ABA@I
-SBA5<LH=@<I(I<S(P96786\[Q(<?(=>A( @=J( <HI @L(<?(=>A(
@=J(<?( >HL)(K@5=)(0A L)B@IC(@=5(@I=AI=@<I(=<(A5=)-L@5>(
<//HI@=J(?) @L@=@A5(0@5=B@ =(I<S(678@(X/@LLAI@)Y()I0(
0A5@CI)=A(=\\<(@/DB<KA/AI=()BA)5(=>ABA@I(=<(
)H=><B@GA(=>A(LAKJ(<?()(5DA @)L(=)U(=>ABA@I(=<(?@I)I A(
=>A() VH@5@=@<I(<B( <I5=BH =@<I(<?( AB=)@I(DH-L@ (
?) @L@=@A5
#$%&!'(!#)*+ !,$-% !.
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 17
!" #&-6 '+,, -."+ -& ,*"/"01($ =&.&* "9 "94B;
SBA5<LH=@<I(I<S(P96786\[\[(<?(=>A( @=J( <HI @L(<?(=>A(
@=J(<?( >HL)(K@5=)(0A L)B@IC(=>A(IA A55@=J(=<(@I HB()(
-<I0A0(@I0A-=A0IA55(<?( <//HI@=J(?) @L@=@A5(0@5=B@ =(
I<S(678@(X/@LLAI@)Y(?<B(@/DB<KA/AI=()BA)(I<S(6()I0(
@/DB<KA/AI=()BA)(I<S(P(=>ABA@I(=<(-A(5A HBA0(-J(
5DA @)L(=)UA5(LAK@A0(\\@=>@I(A) >(BA5DA =@KA(
@/DB<KA/AI=()BA)(=<(D)J(?<B(=>A() VH@5@=@<I(<B(
<I5=BH =@<I(<?( AB=)@I(DH-L@ (?) @L@=@A5
D,6#77,-@,@"=6 #-3" #&-6 '"(@#S " %,"1,*#'& #-*P
6789:PQ
BA5<LH=@<I(I<S(P96786\[7(<?(=>A( @=J( <HI @L(<?(=>A( @=J(
2P
<?( >HL)(K@5=)()DDB<K@IC()(=B)5>()55A55/AI=(-)5AL@IA(
5=H0J()I0(5=BH =HB)L(-/D(?A)5@-@L@=J(BAD<B=(
<I5HL=@IC(5ABK@ A5()CBAA/AI=(-A=\\AAI(=>A( @=J(<?(
>HL)(K@5=)()I0(08/)U(AIC@IAAB@IC(@I S(()I0()H=><B@G@IC(
=>A( @=J(/)I)CAB(=<()DDB<KA(HD(=<(=\\<(<IA8JA)B(
AU=AI5@<I5(=<(5)@0()CBAA/AI=
D,6#77,-@,@"=6 #-3" #&-6 '"(@#S " %,"1,*#'& #-P
6789:Q:)SBA5<LH=@<I(I<S(P96786\[T(<?(=>A( @=J( <HI @L(<?(=>A(
;P
@=J(<?( >HL)(K@5=)() AD=@IC(\]P:,999(?B</(=>A( <HI=J(
<?(5)I(0@AC<( )L@?<BI@)(@0AI=@?@ )=@<I(DB<CB)/,()00@IC(
<IA(L)=AI=(DB@I=(AU)/@IAB(=<(=>A()H=><B@GA0(5=)??@IC(
<?(=>A(D<L@ A(0AD)B=/AI=,()I0()DDB<DB@)=@IC(5)@0(
?HI05(=<(=>A(?@5 )L(JA)B(P967ZP96T(D<L@ A(0AD)B=/AI=(
-H0CA=(XQZ\[(K<=A(BAVH@BA0Y
-SBA5<LH=@<I(I<S(P96786\[;(<?(=>A( @=J( <HI @L(<?(=>A(
@=J(<?( >HL)(K@5=)()/AI0@IC(=>A( </DAI5)=@<I(
5 >A0HLA(=<(BA?LA =(=>A( <BBA =(5)L)BJ(?<B(5AI@<B(
L)=AI=(DB@I=(AU)/@IAB
SBA5<LH=@<I(I<S(P96786\[R(<?(=>A( @=J( <HI @L(<?(=>A(
@=J(<?( >HL)(K@5=)()DDB<K@IC(=>A(BAK@5A0(?@5 )L(JA)B(
P967ZP96T( </DAI5)=@<I(5 >A0HLA(A??A =@KA()HCH5=(\[,(
P967,()5(BAVH@BA0(-J( )L@?<BI@)( <0A(<?(BACHL)=@<I5,(
=@=LA(P,(5A =@<I(\[T9S\[
D,6#77,-@,@"=6 #-3" #&-6 '"(@#S " %,"1,*#'& #-*P
#$%&!'(!#)*+ !,$-% !/
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 18
!" #&-6 '+,, -."+ -& ,*"/"01($ =&.&* "9 "94B;
88%*A$# *+ ', -*)1 )' -$# )3$%
= CIKJ3="7# #-"U(*"7(@,"8!" #&-6 '7,78,1"?,-*#&**(- "*,6#-@,@"8!"
#&-6 '7,78,1"=.& '(1 " #"(SS1#>,"* ($$V*"1,6#77,-@( #-*"#-" %,"(8#>,"
#-*,- " (',-@(1" ,7* "%,(@ -.*"1,(@ " ,W "U( >,@P"C%,"7# #-"6(11 ,@"8!" %,"
$#''#U -."># ,3
I ,7*"B "T= "(-@"<" %1#&.%";3
\[(8()* "#+',(-% . ..+ ,(/! + ,(/"%.% (+ 4( +."##+.(5+#+.
N,*3
9(((
J#3
9(((
=8* ( -3
I ,7"93
Q(8()* "#+',(-% . ..+ ,(/"%.% (+ 4( +."##+.(5+#+.
N,*3
6(8(/! +
J#3
9(((
=8* ( -3
I ,7"T?3
Q(8()* "#+',(-% . ..+ ,(/"%.% (+ 4( +."##+.(5+#+.
N,*3
9(((
J#3
6(8(/! +
=8* ( -3
ICE+O"DE+K)E0"LDK+"CME" KJOEJC" =HEJ0=D
R, % 2 % )*) 9
5G?HI " K++EJCO
R, % 2 % )*) 9
5G?HI "ME=DIJFO
67896RQ
<I5@0AB)=@<I(<?(=A5=@/<IJ(?<B(=>A(?@5 )L(JA)B(
:P
P967ZP96T(LAKJ(<?()55A55/AI=5()I0( <LLA =@<I()C)@I5=(
=><5A()55A55/AI=5(?<B( AB=)@I(<DAI(5D) A()I0(
/)@I=AI)I A(0@5=B@ =5(
)SBA5<LH=@<I(I<S(P9678679(<?(=>A( @=J( <HI @L(<?(=>A(
@=J(<?( >HL)(K@5=)(LAKJ@IC(=>A()55A55/AI=5()I0(
<LLA =@-LA5(?<B(=>A(?@5 )L(JA)B(P967ZP96T(?<B(<DAI(
5D) A(0@5=B@ =5(P(=>B<HC>(T,(R,(66,(6Q,(6\[,(6T,(6;,(P9(XG<IA5(
6,(P,(Q,(\[,(7,(;Y,(P:,(PQ,(P7,(:6,(::,(A)5=L)MA(/)@I=AI)I A(
0@5=B@ =(I<(6(XG<IA5(-,( ,()I0(0Y,()I0(-)J(-<HLAK)B0(
/)@I=AI)I A(0@5=B@ =
-SBA5<LH=@<I(I<S(P9678676(<?(=>A( @=J( <HI @L(<?(=>A(
@=J(<?( >HL)(K@5=)(LAKJ@IC(=>A()55A55/AI=5()I0(
<LLA =@-LA5(?<B(=>A(?@5 )L(JA)B(P967ZP96T(?<B(<DAI(
5D) A(/)@I=AI)I A(0@5=B@ =(I<S(6
#$%&!'(!#)*+ !,$-% !0
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 19
!" #&-6 '+,, -."+ -& ,*"/"01($ =&.&* "9 "94B;
SBA5<LH=@<I(I<S(P967867P(<?(=>A( @=J( <HI @L(<?(=>A(
@=J(<?( >HL)(K@5=)(LAKJ@IC(=>A()55A55/AI=5()I0(
<LLA =@-LA5(?<B(=>A(?@5 )L(JA)B(P967ZP96T(?<B(<DAI(
5D) A(0@5=B@ =5(;()I0(P9(XG<IA5(:,(T,()I0(RY
0SBA5<LH=@<I(I<S(P967867:(<?(=>A( @=J( <HI @L(<?(=>A(
@=J(<?( >HL)(K@5=)(LAKJ@IC(=>A()55A55/AI=5()I0(
<LLA =@-LA5(?<B(=>A(?@5 )L(JA)B(P967ZP96T(?<B(<DAI(
5D) A(0@5=B@ =5(69,(A)5=L)MA(/)@I=AI)I A(0@5=B@ =(I<(6(
XG<IA(AY,()I0(=<\\I( AI=BA(/)@I=AI)I A(0@5=B@ =
ASBA5<LH=@<I(I<S(P967867Q(<?(=>A( @=J( <HI @L(<?(=>A(
@=J(<?( >HL)(K@5=)(LAKJ@IC(=>A()55A55/AI=5()I0(
<LLA =@-LA5(?<B(=>A(?@5 )L(JA)B(P967ZP96T(?<B(<DAI(
5D) A(0@5=B@ =(A)5=L)MA(/)@I=AI)I A(0@5=B@ =(I<(6(
XG<IA()Y
((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((S
E*'(/ *+ ', , $%()! 2$1 !(A ) () $//*%3$)/ 2(', # !$# % S"(% : )'1< $)3 ', , $%()! 2$1 , #3 *) ',
3$' $)3 )* $%#( % ',$) ', '(: 18 /(+( 3 () ', )*'(/ 9
H 8"'. &$.*% &( 1 ) 8% A(*"1#. *8 ) 3 ', 8";#(/ , $%()! $' ', : '()! *+ J"#. >?< >6T?9
&$.*% -$1(##$1 G$#$1 $))*")/ 3 ', +*##*2()! 8*' )'($# 8%*8 %'.N% #$' 3 /*)+#(/'1 *+ ()' % 1'5
-*")/(#: :; % &/-$)) *) P' : 7F< -*")/(#: :; % !"(#$% *) P' : 7-< &$.*% -$1(##$1 G$#$1 *) P' :
7H< $)3 H 8"'. &$.*% &( 1 ) *) P' : 7M9
R, % ; ()! )* : :; %1 *+ ', 8";#(/ 2,* 2(1, 3 '* 18 $D< &$.*% -$1(##$1 G$#$1 /#*1 3 ', 8";#(/
, $%()!9
-*")/(#: :; % &/-$)) # +' ', 3$(1 3"%()! A*'()! *) P' : 7F9
= CIKJ3="7# #-"U(*"7(@,"8!"+(!#1" (* ''(*"O('(* "*,6#-@,@"8!" #&-6 '7,78,1"
?,-*#&**(- " %( "D,*#'& #-"J#P"94B;/B;B"QI ,7":?R"8,"(@#S ,@ "%,(@ -."1,(@ "
,W "U( >,@P"C%,"7# #-"6(11 ,@"8!" %,"$#''#U -."># ,3
Q(8()* "#+',(-% . ..+ ,(/"%.% (+ 4( +."##+.(5+#+.
N,*3
9(((
J#3
6(8(/! +
=8* ( -3
-*")/(#: :; % &/-$)) % '"%) 3 '* ', 3$(19 -*")/(#: :; % !"(#$% # +' ', 3$(1 3"%()! A*'()! *) P' :
7-9
= CIKJ3="7# #-"U(*"7(@,"8!"+(!#1" (* ''(*"O('(* "*,6#-@,@"8!"0,S& !"+(!#1"+ ,*,- "
%( "D,*#'& #-"J#P"94B;/B;9"QI ,7": R"8,"(@#S ,@ "%,(@ -."1,(@ " ,W "U( >,@P"
C%,"7# #-"6(11 ,@"8!" %,"$#''#U -."># ,3
Q(8(-% . ..+ ,(/! + ,(/"%.% (+ 4( +."##+.(5+#+.
N,*3
9(((
J#3
6(8()* "#+'
=8* ( -3
-*")/(#: :; % !"(#$% % '"%) 3 '* ', 3$(19 &$.*% -$1(##$1 G$#$1 # +' ', 3$(1 3"%()! A*'()! *) P' : 7H
$)3 H 8"'. &$.*% &( 1 ) # 3 ', A*'()! *) ',$' (' :9
#$%&!'(!#)*+ !,$-% !1
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 20
!" #&-6 '+,, -."+ -& ,*"/"01($ =&.&* "9 "94B;
= CIKJ3="7# #-"U(*"7(@,"8!" #&-6 '7,78,1"=.& '(1 "*,6#-@,@"8!" #&-6 '7,78,1"
?,-*#&**(- " %( "D,*#'& #-"94B;/B;T"QI ,7":0R"8,"(@#S ,@ "%,(@ -."1,(@ " ,W "
U( >,@P"C%,"7# #-"6(11 ,@"8!" %,"$#''#U -."># ,3
Q(8()* "#+',(-% . ..+ ,(/! + (+ 4(/"%.%
N,*3
9(((
J#3
6(8( +."##+.(5+#+.
=8* ( -3
&$.*% -$1(##$1 G$#$1 % '"%) 3 '* ', 3$(19 -*")/(#: :; % &( 1 ) # +' ', 3$(1 3"%()! A*'()! *) P' : 7M9
= CIKJ3="7# #-"U(*"7(@,"8!" #&-6 '7,78,1"=.& '(1 "*,6#-@,@"8!" #&-6 '7,78,1"
?,-*#&**(- " %( "D,*#'& #-"J#P"94B;/B;<"QI ,7":ER"8,"(@#S ,@ "%,(@ -."1,(@ "
,W "U( >,@P"C%,"7# #-"6(11 ,@"8!" %,"$#''#U -."># ,3
Q(8()* "#+',(-% . ..+ ,(/! + (+ 4( +."##+.(5+#+.
N,*3
9(((
J#3
6(8(/"%.%
=8* ( -3
-*")/(#: :; % &( 1 ) % '"%) 3 '* ', 3$(19
= CIKJ3="7# #-"U(*"7(@,"8!"0,S& !"+(!#1"+ ,*,- "*,6#-@,@"8!" #&-6 '7,78,1"
=.& '(1 " %( "D,*#'& #-"J#P"94B;/B;4"QI ,7":=R"8,"(@#S ,@ "%,(@ -."1,(@ " ,W "
U( >,@P"C%,"7# #-"6(11 ,@"8!" %,"$#''#U -."># ,3
\[(8()* "#+',(-% . ..+ ,(/! + ,(/"%.% (+ 4( +."##+.(5+#+.
N,*3
9(((
J#3
9(((
=8* ( -3
?K=D0"=J0" K++IOOIKJ"DE5KDCO
6789:7P @=J( <HI @L( <I5@0AB)=@<I(<?( >)B=AB( >)ICA5(
XP
BAC)B0@IC(=>A( @=J()==<BIAJ()I0(LAC@5L)=@KA( <HI5AL(
BA <//AI0A0(-J(=>A( >)B=AB(BAK@A\\( <//@55@<I(?<B(
DL) A/AI=(<I(=>A(I<KA/-AB(P967(-)LL<=
-$%%$ ,$:.< -,$(%< -,$%' % A( 2 -*::(11(*)< 18*D () 1"88*%' *+ ', -*")/(# /*)1(3 %()! ',
-*::(11(*)U1 % /*:: )3$'(*) () '(: +*% $ : $1"% '* ; 8#$/ 3 *) ', ;$##*' +*% ', E*A :; % >6T?
# /'(*)9
' ', % S" 1' *+ &$.*% -$1(##$1 G$#$1< ', % 2$1 /*)1 )1"1 *+ $ :$V*%('. *+ ', -*")/(# '* /*)'()"
3(1/"11(*) *+ ', (' : '* $ V*()' 2*%D1,*8 *+ ', -('. -*")/(# $)3 ', -,$%' % A( 2 -*::(11(*) $' $
+"'"% 3$' 9
&$.*% -$1(##$1 G$#$1 % / 11 3 ', : '()! $' 454W 89:9 R, -*")/(# % /*)A ) 3 $' ?5Q6 89:9< 2(', $##
: :; %1 8% 1 )'9
ICN"+=J=FEDYO"DE5KDCO
R, % 2 % )*) 9
#$%&!'(!#)*+ !,$-% !2
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 21
!" #&-6 '+,, -."+ -& ,*"/"01($ =&.&* "9 "94B;
+=NKDYO"DE5KDCO
6789::9
."4%'+2" ( N(+11 " 2$% 2( N(+(^ 2" *(4%#%*+2%(+ 4(+#2%' +2%(N '(2_%(
AP
P967(L%+* %( N( +#"N ' "+( "2"%.() +#( N%'% !%,(2 (&%(_%#4(" (L *(
-%+!_,(<!2 &%'(\[(2_' *_(TS
= CIKJ3="7# #-"U(*"7(@,"8!" #&-6 '7,78,1"+6 (-- "*,6#-@,@"8!"+(!#1" (* ''(*"
O('(* " %( "0,S& !"+(!#1"+ ,*,-"8,"(SS# - ,@"(*" %,"># -."@,',.( ,"(-@"
#&-6 '7,78,1"?,-*#&**(-"8,"(SS# - ,@"(*" %,"(' ,1-( ,"$#1" %,"94B;"H,(.&,"#$"
(' $#1- (" ,*"=--&('" #-$,1,-6,P"C%,"7# #-"6(11 ,@"8!" %,"$#''#U -."># ,3
\[(8()* "#+',(-% . ..+ ,(/! + ,(/"%.% (+ 4( +."##+.(5+#+.
N,*3
9(((
J#3
9(((
=8* ( -3
&$.*% -$1(##$1 G$#$1 % 8*%' 3 *) , % % / )' $'' )3$)/ $' ', M)A(%*): )'$# B%*' /'(*) ! )/.U1 X*/$#
C*A %): )' 3A(1*%. -*::('' : '()! $)3 $ % / )' M$!# G/*"' - % :*).9
&$.*% -$1(##$1 G$#$1 18*D % !$%3()! , % $'' )3$)/ $' A(!(#1 () ,*)*% *+ +$## ) G$) H( !* B*#(/ I++(/ %
$)3 -,"#$ 0(1'$ % 1(3 )' J*)$',$) H C"K:$)< $)3 Y8% 11 3 , % 1"88*%' $)3 !%$'('"3 +*% : :; %1 *+
#$2 )+*%/ : )'9
KGJ IH+E+?EDOY" K++EJCO
H 8"'. &$.*% &( 1 ) Y8% 11 3 1"88*%' $)3 $88% /($'(*) +*% #$2 )+*%/ : )' *++(/ %19 = 18*D
% !$%3()! ', "8/*:()! X(A()! -*$1' H(1/*A %. - )' % +")3%$(1 %9
-*")/(#: :; % &/-$)) ',$)D 3 : :; %1 *+ ', B*#(/ +*%/ $)3 18*D % !$%3()! $ % / )' C(%# G/*"'1
;#" %(;;*) A )' $' = %('$! B$%D () ,*)*% *+ +$## ) B*#(/ I++(/ % J*)$',$) H C"K:$)9
-*")/(#: :; % F )1*"11$) 18*D % !$%3()! ', "8/*:()! =$%;*%@ 1' A )'9
-*")/(#: :; % !"(#$% Y8% 11 3 !%$'('"3 '* 8*#(/ *++(/ %19
-('. ''*%) . C**!()1 $))*")/ 3 ',$' ', -*")/(# 2*"#3 /*)A ) () /#*1 3 1 11(*) '* 3(1/"11 P' : T6
#(1' 3 ; #*29 = 1'$' 3 ',$' P' : TT 2*"#3 )*' ; 3(1/"11 3 $' ',$' '(: 9
' ?5ZZ 89:9< ', -*")/(# /*)A ) 3 () -#*1 3 G 11(*)9
#$%&!'(!#)*+ !,$-% !3
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 22
!" #&-6 '+,, -."+ -& ,*"/"01($ =&.&* "9 "94B;
HKOE0"OEOOIKJ
D '. + 2(2 (B%. # 2" (I S(6:T97(+ 4( !"#(D #"!3(I S(:Q789:,(<NN"!"+#(/" 2%.(+ 4(
'%! '4.( N(+!2" (2+E% (4 '" *( # .%4(5%.." .(+'%($+" 2+" %4(&3(2_%( "23()22 ' %3S
6789:7R <I?ABAI A(\\@=>(BA)L(DB<DAB=J(IAC<=@)=<B5(DHB5H)I=(
B4P
=<(C<KABI/AI=( <0A(5A =@<I(\[QR\[7S;
D' 1%'23`((T9T(a?b(52S,( _ #+(K".2+,( )((R6R69
)*% !3(I%* 2"+2 '.`((A'"!( ' !E%22(+ 4(B"!E(B3+#.
I%* 2"+2" *(D+'2"%.`(( "23( N( _ #+(K".2+(X c %'Y(+ 4(C'+1%^" %(
0%^%# 1$% 2,('%1'%.% 2%4(&3(/"* %#(K+de %d,(+ 4(-'"4*%(@ ^%.2$% 2(
C' 1(> #4" *.(LL ,('%1'%.% 2%4(&3(A'"!(>%NN %'(X1 '!_+.%'Y
H 4%'(I%* 2"+2" `((5+#%.(1'"!%(+ 4(2%'$.
= CIKJ3J#"1,S#1 (8',"(6 #-P
6789:;; <I?ABAI A(\\@=>(LAC)L( <HI5AL(BAC)B0@IC(AU@5=@IC(
BBP
L@=@C)=@<I(DHB5H)I=(=<(C<KABI/AI=( <0A(5A =@<I(
\[QR\[7SR(X4YX6Y
I+$%( N(!+.%`M+'% (BS(A.! &%4 (+.(=' .2%%( N(2_%(@'^" *()S(
A.! &%4 (+ 4(M+'% (BS(A.! &%4 (?+$"#3(=' .2(^S( "23( N( _ #+(K".2+,(
5+ (0"%* (5 1%'" '( '2,( +.%(I S(:T8P96\[89999T;P\[8 H8D<8 =LS
P' : TT 2$1 )*' 3(1/"11 39
=0ZKGDJ+EJC
' 75>6 89:9< &$.*% -$1(##$1 G$#$1 $3V*"%) 3 ', : '()! () : :*%. *+ +$## ) B*#(/ I++(/ % H C"K:$)
'* ', !"#$% -('. -*")/(# & '()! *) "!"1' W< >6T?< $' 4566 89:9< () ', -*")/(# -,$:; %19
fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
M%''3(MS(-"*%# c,()..".2+ 2( "23( #%'E
#$%&!'(!#)*+ !,$-% !4
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 23
City of Chula Vista
Staff Report
File#:16-0392, Item#: 2.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
A.Letter of resignation from Max Zaker effective August 2, 2016, Housing Commission.
B.MemorandumfromCouncilmemberAguilarrequestinganexcusedabsencefromtheJuly26,
2016 City Council meeting.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Council accept the resignation and excuse the absence.
City of Chula VistaPage 1 of 1Printed on 8/4/2016
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 24
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 25
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 26
City of Chula Vista
Staff Report
File#:16-0278, Item#: 3.
RESOLUTIONOFTHECITYCOUNCILOFTHECITYOFCHULAVISTAAPPROVINGAN
AGREEMENTFORPREPARATIONOFAPEDESTRIANCONNECTIVITYANDINFRASTRUCTURE
IMPROVEMENTPLANBETWEENTHECITYOFCHULAVISTAANDCOLE&ASSOCIATES,INC.,
ANDAPPROPRIATING$30,000FROMTHEAVAILABLEBALANCEOFTHETRANSNETFUNDTO
CIP GG222, “ASSET MANAGEMENT” (4/5 VOTE REQUIRED)
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Council adopt the resolution.
SUMMARY
InordertocomplywithAmericanswithDisabilitiesActrequirementsandtoupdatetheCity’s
informationoninfrastructurecondition,theCityissuedaRequestforProposalsforpreparationofa
PedestrianConnectivityandInfrastructureImprovementPlan.Fivefirmssubmittedproposalsand
thetoptwofirmswereinterviewed.Basedonthereviewoftheproposalsandtheinterviews,staff
recommends that the contract be awarded to Cole & Associates, Inc.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Environmental Notice
Thisactivityisnota“Project”asdefinedunderSection15378oftheCaliforniaEnvironmentalQuality
actStateGuidelines,therefore,pursuanttoStateGuidelinesSection15060(c)(3)noenvironmental
review is required.
Environmental Determination
TheproposedactivityhasbeenreviewedforcompliancewiththeCaliforniaEnvironmentalQuality
Act(CEQA)andithasbeendeterminedthattheactivityisnota“Project”asdefinedunderSection
15378oftheStateCEQAGuidelinesbecauseitwillnotresultinaphysicalchangeinthe
environment;therefore,pursuanttoSection15060(c)(3)oftheStateCEQAGuidelines,theactivity
is not subject to CEQA. Thus, no environmental review is required.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
Not applicable
DISCUSSION
TheCityoriginallyestablishedtheCapitalImprovementProgramprojectGG222:“Asset
Management”inordertoidentifyallCity-ownedassets,performconditionassessments,consolidate
theinformationintoacentralizeddatabase,andprepareaPreservationandRehabilitationPlanto
assistthecityinprioritizingtheallocationoflimitedresources.Onemajorportionofthisplan
includespedestrianinfrastructure,suchassidewalks,pedestrianramps,pedestriantrafficsignals,
and crosswalks.
City of Chula VistaPage 1 of 4Printed on 8/4/2016
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 27
File#:16-0278, Item#: 3.
PedestrianinfrastructureisincludedaspartoftheAmericanswithDisabilitiesAct(ADA).TheCity
originallywroteanADATransitionPlanin1994,asrequiredbylaw.Sincethatdate,theCityhas
beencompilingalistofmissingpedestrianrampsatintersectionsandhasbeenregularly
constructingrampsfromthislistaspartoftheCity’sCapitalImprovementProgram.However,staff
doesnothavealistofexistingrampsthatarenotcompliantwiththelatest2010ADAstandards.
Additionally, staff does not have a comprehensive list on the condition of the City’s sidewalks.
OnDecember25,2015,theCityissuedaRequestforProposals(RFP)forpreparationofa
PedestrianConnectivityandInfrastructureImprovementPlan.TheRFPwasadvertisedin
accordancewiththeCity’srequirements.TheobjectivesoftheplanaretoevaluateallCitysidewalks
andrampsstandards,torankdeficientsidewalksandramps,topreparerecommendationsfor
improvements,andtotrainstafftoupdatetherecommendations.Thecostwasestimatedtobe
between $350,000 and $450,000. Proposals were due by 4:00 pm on January 22, 2016.
Citystaffreceivedfiveproposalsbytheduedate.Therewasafivememberselectionpanel.The
consultants’ proposals were evaluated and ranked as shown in the table below.
RANKCONSULTANTLOCATIONFEE
ESTIMATE
1Cole & Associates,St. Louis, MO$445,311
Inc. w/ Chen Ryan
1Sally Swanson &San Francisco, CA$433,678
Associates w/ Chen
Ryan
3 NCE (NicholsFountain Valley,$409,100
ConsultingCA
Engineers)
4KOA CorporationSan Diego, CA$372,370
5Rick Engineering Co.San Diego, CA$407,100
w/ U.S. Access
Consultants
Basedontheaboveranking,theselectionpaneldecidedtoInterviewCole&AssociatesandSally
Swanson&Associates.BothfirmsproposedtouseChenRyanasasubcontractor.ChenRyan
preparedtheBikesonBroadwaystudy,andseveraloftheirstaffmembersworkedontheCity’s
Pedestrian Master Plan.
BothfirmswereinterviewedonMarch15,2016.Basedontheinterviews,thepanelunanimously
decidedtoselectCole&Associatesasthefirstnegotiatingchoice.Althoughbothfirmswere
determinedtobequalified,Colewasselectedbasedonthequalificationsoftheprojectteam,their
understandingoftheworktobedone,theirknowledgeoftheADAguidelines,theproposeddata
collection methodology, and their proposed project schedule.
StaffhasnegotiatedwithCole&Associatestoaddsomeitemstotheoriginalscopeandtomake
City of Chula VistaPage 2 of 4Printed on 8/4/2016
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 28
File#:16-0278, Item#: 3.
surethattheentireCitywouldbesurveyed.Thisincludesapproximately444.0centerlinemilesof
publicroadways.Thefinalproposedcostofthiscontractwillbe$443,230.34,whichisapproximately
$2,000 less than the original proposal. The contract will include the following:
SurveydataforallsidewalksandpedestrianrampswithintheCity,includingintersection
evaluation for ramps that are ADA compliant
Evaluation of pedestrian traffic signals
Prioritization, preliminary cost estimates, and a recommended improvement program
Preparation of a Pedestrian Connectivity Plan
AseriesofthreepublicmeetingsindifferentareasoftheCityandapresentationtoCouncilfor
approval
IntegrationofinspectiondataintotheCity’sGeographicInformationSystem(GIS)andLucity
software
TrainingforCitystaffinusingthenewdatabase,updatingcosttables,andevaluatingproject
feasibility
The work on this contract is required to be completed by June 30, 2017.
DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT
Staffhasreviewedthedecisioncontemplatedbythisactionandhasdeterminedthatitisnotsite-
specificandconsequently,the500-footrulefoundinCaliforniaCodeofRegulationsTitle2,section
18702.2(a)(11),isnotapplicabletothisdecisionforpurposesofdeterminingadisqualifyingreal
property-relatedfinancialconflictofinterestunderthePoliticalReformAct(Cal.Gov’tCode§87100,
et seq.).
Staffisnotindependentlyaware,andhasnotbeeninformedbyanyCityCouncilmember,ofany
other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter.
LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS
TheCity’sStrategicPlanhasfivemajorgoals:OperationalExcellence,EconomicVitality,Healthy
Community,StrongandSecureNeighborhoodsandaConnectedCommunity.Thegoalofthe
PedestrianConnectivityandInfrastructureImprovementPlanistosupporttheStrongandSecure
NeighborhoodStrategy.ItwillguideCitystaffinpreparingprogramsforthemaintenanceand
rehabilitationoftheCity’ssidewalks,therebyprovidingasafeandefficientroadwaysystemfor
residents, businesses and visitors.
CURRENT YEAR FISCAL IMPACT
ThecurrentfundinginGG222is$420,164.Adoptionoftheresolutionwillapproveanagreementfor
preparationofaPedestrianConnectivityandInfrastructureImprovementPlanwithCole&
Associates,Inc.andappropriateanadditional$30,000inTransNettoGG222.Sufficientfundsare
available in the TransNet Fund for said appropriation.
ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT
Implementationoftheplanwillrequireadditionalfunds.Projectswillbeconsideredonanindividual
basis as part of the annual budget process.
City of Chula VistaPage 3 of 4Printed on 8/4/2016
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 29
File#:16-0278, Item#: 3.
ATTACHMENTS
1.Proposed Agreement with Cole & Associates
Staff Contact: Elizabeth Chopp, Senior Civil Engineer
City of Chula VistaPage 4 of 4Printed on 8/4/2016
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 30
RESOLUTION NO. __________
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
APPROVING AN AGREEMENT FOR PREPARATION OF A
PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIVITY AND INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT PLAN
BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND COLE & ASSOCIATES, INC. AND
APPROPRIATING $30,000 FROM THE AVAILABLE BALANCE OF THE
TRANSNET FUND TO CIP GG222, “ASSET MANAGEMENT” (4/5 VOTE
REQUIRED)
WHEREAS,City requires professional services to collect data on the condition of the
City’s pedestrian infrastructure and prepare a Pedestrian Connectivity and Infrastructure
Improvement Plan ;and
WHEREAS,in order to procure these services, City solicited proposals in accordance
with Chula Vista Municipal Code Section 2.56.110, received five proposals, conducted
interviews, and selected Consultant as the most qualified amongst those submitting; and
WHEREAS, Consultant represents that it is knowledgeable and experienced regarding
the 2010 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards, California Title 24, the Access
Board’s Public Right of Way Guidelines, and the U.S. Department of Transportation’s ADA
Standards for Transportation; and
WHEREAS, Consultant represents that it is experienced and staffed in a manner such that
it can deliver the services required of Consultant to City in accordance with the time frames and
the terms and conditions of this Agreement; and
WHEREAS,Staff recommends appropriating an additional $30,000 from the available
balance in the TransNet Fundto provide sufficient funds for this project.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula
Vista, that it approves the agreement for $443,230.34 for preparation of a Pedestrian
Connectivity and Infrastructure Improvement Plan between the City and Cole & Associates, Inc.
inthe form presented, with such minor modifications as may be required or approved by the City
,
Attorney, a copy of which shall be kepton file in the Office of the CityEngineerand authorizes
and directsthe Mayorto execute same.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, that it
appropriates $30,000from the available balance of the TransNet Fund to CIPGG222, “Asset
Management”.
C:\\Users\\GRANIC~1\\AppData\\Local\\Temp\\BCL Technologies\\easyPDF 7\\@BCL@6C058BA0\\@BCL@6C058BA0.doc
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 31
Resolution No.
Page 2
Presented byApproved as to form by
Richard A. HopkinsGlen R. Googins
Director of Public WorksCity Attorney
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 32
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 33
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 34
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 35
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 36
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 37
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 38
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 39
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 40
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 41
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 42
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 43
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 44
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 45
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 46
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 47
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 48
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 49
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 50
City of Chula Vista
Staff Report
File#:16-0377, Item#: 4.
RESOLUTIONOFTHECITYCOUNCILOFTHECITYOFCHULAVISTAAUTHORIZINGTHE
PURCHASEOFONECOMBINATIONSEWERCLEANINGTRUCKINACCORDANCEWITHTHE
TERMSANDCONDITIONSOFNATIONALJOINTPOWERSALLIANCECONTRACTNUMBER
102811ANDTHEISSUANCEOFAPURCHASEORDERTONATIONALAUTOFLEETGROUPIN
THE AMOUNT OF $439,961
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Council adopt the resolution.
SUMMARY
TheFiscalYear2016-17SewerServiceRevenueFundbudgetprovidesforthereplacementofa
2008InternationalVactorcombinationsewercleaningtruck.TheCityofChulaVistaMunicipalCode
Section2.56.270andCouncilResolutionNo.6132authorizethePurchasingAgenttoparticipatein
cooperativebidswithothergovernmentagenciesforthepurchaseofmaterialsofcommonusage.
TheCityhasanopportunitytoparticipateinacurrentNationalJointPowersAlliance(NJPA)contract
for such a vehicle.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Environmental Notice
Theactivityisnota“Project”asdefinedunderSection15378oftheCaliforniaEnvironmentalQuality
ActStateGuidelines;therefore,pursuanttoStateGuidelinesSection15060(c)(3)noenvironmental
review is required.
Environmental Determination
TheDirectorofDevelopmentServiceshasreviewedtheproposedactivityforcompliancewiththeCalifornia
EnvironmentalQualityAct(CEQA)andhasdeterminedthattheactivityisnota“Project”asdefinedunder
Section15378oftheStateCEQAGuidelinesbecauseitwillnotresultinaphysicalchangeintheenvironment;
therefore,pursuanttoSection15060(c)(3)oftheStateCEQAGuidelines,theactivityisnotsubjecttoCEQA.
Thus, no environmental review is required.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
Not Applicable
DISCUSSION
TheFiscalYear2016-17SewerServiceRevenueFundbudgetprovidesforthereplacementofa
2008InternationalVactorcombinationsewercleaningtruck.Duetotheuniquenatureofthis
equipment,wastewatermaintenancestaffconductedextensiveresearchintothetypesofequipment
availableintheindustry,andevaluatedeachprospectivepieceofequipmentforitsfunctionalityand
City of Chula VistaPage 1 of 2Printed on 8/4/2016
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 51
File#:16-0377, Item#: 4.
suitabilityforitsintendedpurpose.Equipmentbuiltbythreedifferentmanufacturerswasevaluated
duringthisprocess.StaffdeterminedthattheequipmentmanufacturedbyGapVax,Inc.,andsoldby
Plumber’sDepot,Inc.,bestmeetstheneedsofthedepartment.AcurrentMJPAcontractfora
machine meeting the needs of the City exists.
Replacingtheexistingsewercleaningtruckatthistimewillyieldimprovementsintheabilityofthe
wastewatermaintenanceprogramtomaintaintheCity’sassetsthatarerepresentedbysewerlines,
andwillleadtolowercostsofmaintainingsuchassetsintheimmediatefuture,andtoextendthe
useful life of these assets.
DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT
Staffhasreviewedthedecisioncontemplatedbythisactionandhasdeterminedthatitisnotsite
specificandconsequently,the500-footrulefoundinCaliforniaCodeofRegulationssection18704.2
(a)(1),isnotapplicabletothisdecision.Staffisnotindependentlyaware,andhasnotbeeninformed
byanyCityofChulaVistaCityCouncilmember,ofanyotherfactthatmayconstituteabasisfora
decision maker conflict of interest in this matter.
LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS
TheCity’sStrategicPlanhasfivemajorgoals:OperationalExcellence,EconomicVitality,Healthy
Community,StrongandSecureNeighborhoodsandaConnectedCommunity.Thisactionsupports
thegoalofprovidingHealthyCommunities,ashavingservicevehiclesingoodworkingcondition
allows staff to maintain and operate community and neighborhood wastewater facilities.
CURRENT YEAR FISCAL IMPACT
Thenettotalcostincludingtaxesis$439,961.Sufficientfundshavebeenbudgetedinthecurrent
fiscal year budget. There is no net fiscal impact to the General Fund by approving this resolution.
ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT
Sincethisisareplacementvehicleforanexistingagingfleetvehicle,maintenancecostsarealready
includedinthecurrentfiscalyearbudget.Thereisnoongoingfiscalimpactbyapprovingthis
resolution.
ATTACHMENTS
1.National Auto Fleet Group quote
Staff Contact: Steve Dorsey, Fleet Manager, Public Works
City of Chula VistaPage 2 of 2Printed on 8/4/2016
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 52
RESOLUTION NO. __________
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF ONE
COMBINATION SEWER CLEANING TRUCK IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF
NATIONAL JOINT POWERS ALLIANCECONTRACT
NUMBER 102811 AND THE ISSUANCE OF A PURCHASE
ORDER TO NATIONAL AUTO FLEET GROUP IN THE
AMOUNT OF $439,961
WHEREAS,the Fiscal Year 2016-17 Sewer Service Revenue Fund budget provides for
the replacement of a 2008 International Vactor combination sewer cleaning truck; and
WHEREAS, the City of Chula Vista Municipal Code Section 2.56.270 and Council
Resolution No. 6132 authorize the Purchasing Agent to participate in cooperative bids with other
government agencies for the purchase of materials of common usage; and
WHEREAS, the City has an opportunity to participate in a current National Joint Powers
Association (NJPA) contract for such a vehicle; and
WHEREAS, replacing the existing sewer cleaning truck at this time will yield
improvements in the ability of the wastewater maintenance program to maintain the City’s assets
that are represented by sewer lines, and will lead to lower costs of maintaining such assets in the
immediate future, and to extend the useful life of these assets; and
WHEREAS, this action supports thegoal of providing Healthy Communities, as having
service vehicles in good working condition allows staff to maintain and operate community and
neighborhood wastewater facilities.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula
Vista, that it authorizesthe purchase of one combination sewer cleaning truck in accordance
with the terms and conditions of National Joint Powers Alliancecontract number 102811 and the
issuance of a purchase order to National Auto Fleet Group in the amount of $439,961.
Presented byApproved as to form by
Richard A. HopkinsGlen R. Googins
Director of Public Works/City EngineerCity Attorney
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 53
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 54
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 55
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 56
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 57
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 58
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 59
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 60
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 61
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 62
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 63
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 64
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 65
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 66
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 67
City of Chula Vista
Staff Report
File#:16-0333, Item#: 5.
RESOLUTIONOFTHECITYCOUNCILOFTHECITYOFCHULAVISTAACCEPTINGBIDS;
AWARDINGACONTRACTFORTHE“MAXFIELDPUMPSTATIONRECONSTRUCTION
PROJECT(CIPNO.SW278)”TOJUSTCONSTRUCTION,INC.INTHEAMOUNTOF$398,631;
APPROPRIATING$320,000FROMTHESEWERFACILITYREPLACEMENTFUNDTOCAPITAL
IMPROVEMENTPROJECTSW278;AUTHORIZINGTHEDIRECTOROFPUBLICWORKSTO
EXECUTEALLCHANGEORDERS;ANDAUTHORIZINGTHEEXPENDITUREOFALLAVAILABLE
CONTINGENCY FUNDS IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $60,000 (4/5 VOTE REQUIRED)
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Council adopt the resolution.
SUMMARY
OnJune29,2016,theDirectorofPublicWorksreceivedseven(7)sealedbidsforthe“MaxField
PumpStationReconstruction(CIPNo.SW278)”project.Theprojectconsistsofthereplacementof
an existing sewage pump station and the installation of a dual force main and gravity main sewer.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Environmental Notice
TheProjectqualifiesforaCategoricalExemptionpursuanttotheCaliforniaEnvironmentalQuality
ActStateGuidelinesSection15301Class1(ExistingFacilities)and/orSection15303Class3(New
Construction or Conversion of Small Structures).
Environmental Determination
TheDirectorofDevelopmentServiceshasreviewedtheproposedprojectforcompliancewiththe
CaliforniaEnvironmentalQualityAct(CEQA)andhasdeterminedthattheprojectqualifiesfora
CategoricalExemptionpursuanttoStateCEQAGuidelinesSection15301Class1(Existing
Facilities)and/orSection15303Class3(NewConstructionorConversionofSmallStructures).Thus,
no further environmental review is required.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
Not Applicable
DISCUSSION
TheMaxFieldPumpStationcurrentlyservesMaxField/RienstraParkLittleLeaguebaseballfield
andisinneedofreplacementandupsizing.Theexistingpumpstationwasbuiltduringthe1970’s
anddoesnotmeetthecurrentstandard.Theexistingpumpeasilyclogsandtheexisting2-inchABS
forcemainthatcrossesanenvironmentalsensitiveareahasfailedseveraltimesendangering
accidentaldischargetothissensitivearea.ThisReconstructionProjectinvolvestheremovaland
City of Chula VistaPage 1 of 4Printed on 8/4/2016
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 68
File#:16-0333, Item#: 5.
disposaloftheexistingsewagepumpstation,abandonmentoftheexistingforcemain,construction
ofnewsewagepumpstationincludingachainlinkfenceenclosure,andtheinstallationofadual
forcemainandgravitymainsewer.Engineeringstaffpreparedthecontractdocumentsand
advertised the project on June 3, 2016.
On June 29, 2016, the Director of Public Works received seven (7) sealed bids as follows:
ContractorBid Amount
Just Construction, Inc. - San Diego, California$398,631.00
Willkom Inc. - National City, California$476,562.00*
Mode Engineering - Laguna Niguel, California$478,650.00
A.B. Hashmi, Inc. - San Diego, California$479,475.00
Blue Pacific Engineering & Construction - San Diego,$497,100.00
California
Charles King Company, Inc. - Signal Hill, California$597,275.00
NEWest Construction Company, Inc.$663,239.00
*
ĴłĿ ōĿĽʼnňľ ļŃľ ŊŌʼnŊʼnōĻņ ĽʼnňŎĻŃňĿľ Ļ ŇĻŎłĿŇĻŎŃĽĻņ ĿŌŌʼnŌ Ļňľ ŃňĽʼnŇŊņĿŎĿ ľʼnĽŏŇĿňŎō. ģʼnŌŌĿĽŎŃʼnňō ʼnŀ ļŃľ ŎʼnŎĻņō ľŃľ ňʼnŎ
ĽłĻňŁĿ ŎłĿ ʼnŏŎĽʼnŇĿ Ļňľ ŌĻňŅŃňŁ ʼnŀ ŎłĿ ļŃľō.
ThelowbidsubmittedbyJustConstruction,Inc.isabovetheEngineer’sestimateof$393,500by
$5,131 (approximately 1.30%).
JustConstruction,Inc.iscurrentlyanactivelicensedClassA,GeneralEngineeringContractor
(LicenseNo.968910)andhasperformedsimilarworkintheCitywithsatisfactoryperformance.Staff
hasreviewedJustConstruction,Inc.bidanddeterminedittoberesponsive.Inaddition,all
companiesassociatedwiththiscontractareregisteredaspublicworkscontractorswiththeCalifornia
DepartmentofIndustrialRelations.Therefore,staffrecommendsawardingtheSW278project
contract to Just Construction, Inc.
TheproposedresolutionwouldalsoauthorizetheDirectorofPublicWorkstoapprovechangeorders
overandaboveexistingpolicylimits.UnderCityCouncilPolicyNo.574-01,ifanindividualchange
ordercausesthecumulativeincreaseinchangeorderstoexceedtheDirector’sauthority,(“Maximum
AggregateIncreaseinChangeOrders”),CityCouncilapprovalisrequired.Thecorresponding
maximumaggregatecontractincreasethatmaybeapprovedbytheDirectorofPublicWorksunder
PolicyNo.574-01is$30,904.17.ApprovaloftheresolutionwouldincreasetheDirectorofPublic
Worksauthoritytoapprovechangeorders,asnecessary,uptocontingencyamountof$60,000.00
(approximately15%ofcontract),anincreaseof$29,095.83overPolicyNo.574-01.Increasingthe
Director’sauthoritywillallowtheprojecttocontinuewithoutdelayshouldunforeseencircumstances
ariseresultinginincreasedprojectcostsduringthecourseofconstruction,aswellasmake
adjustmentstobiditemquantities.Unforeseenconditionsincludesuchitemsasutilityconflicts,
hazardousmaterials,unexpectedundergroundconflicts,etc.Ifthecontingencyfundsarenotused,
they will be returned to the project fund balance.
Wage Statement
City of Chula VistaPage 2 of 4Printed on 8/4/2016
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 69
File#:16-0333, Item#: 5.
TheContractoranditssubcontractorsarerequiredbybidspecificationstopayprevailingwage
(“PrevailingWageRates”)topersonsemployedbythemforworkunderthisContract.Inaccordance
withtheprovisionsofSection1773oftheLaborCodeoftheStateofCalifornia,theCityofChula
Vistahasascertainedthegeneralprevailingwagescalesapplicabletotheworktobedone.The
prevailingwagescalesarethosedeterminedbytheDirectorofIndustrialRelations,Stateof
California.
Disclosure Statement
Attachment 1 is a copy of the Contractor’s Disclosure Statement.
DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT
StaffhasreviewedthepropertyholdingsoftheCityCouncilandhasfoundnopropertyholdings
within500feetoftheboundariesoftheproperties,whicharethesubjectoftheseactions.Staffisnot
independentlyaware,andhasnotbeeninformedbyanyCityCouncilmember,ofanyotherfactthat
may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter.
LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS
TheCity’sStrategicPlanhasfivemajorgoals:OperationalExcellence,EconomicVitality,Healthy
Community,StrongandSecureNeighborhoodsandaConnectedCommunity.TheMaxFieldPump
StationReconstructionprojectsupportstheHealthyCommunityandStrongandSecure
NeighborhoodsStrategicGoalasitimprovessafetyandhealthtotheresidentsaswellascreates
appealing communities to live, work and play.
CURRENT YEAR FISCAL IMPACT
ApprovaloftheresolutionwillawardacontractfortheMaxFieldPumpStationReconstruction
Projectandappropriate$320,000fromSewerFacilityReplacementFundstoSW278.Sufficient
SewerFacilityReplacementFundsareavailableforsaidappropriation.Thetablebelowsummarizes
the anticipated project costs and the funding sources:
FUNDS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION
A. Contract Amount$398,631.00
B. Contingency (Approximately 15% of contract)$60,000.00
C. Construction Inspection, Design and Land Survey Staff Costs$100,000.00
D. Material Testing$12,716.00
TOTAL FUNDS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION$571,347.00
Funding Source
Sewer Facility Replacement Fund$251,347.00
Sewer Facility Replacement Fund (Appropriation)$320,000.00
Total Funding$571,347.00
ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT
Upon completion of the project, the improvements will require routine City maintenance.
City of Chula VistaPage 3 of 4Printed on 8/4/2016
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 70
File#:16-0333, Item#: 5.
ATTACHMENTS
1.Contractor’s Disclosure Statement
Staff Contact: Patrick C. Moneda, Senior Civil Engineer
City of Chula VistaPage 4 of 4Printed on 8/4/2016
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 71
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 72
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 73
RESOLUTION NO. 2016-_____
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULAVISTA ACCEPTING BIDS; AWARDING A
CONTRACT FOR THE MAX FIELD PUMP STATION
RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT(CIPNO.SW278) TO
JUSTCONSTRUCTION, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF
$398,631;APPROPRIATING $320,000 FROM SEWER
FACILITY REPLACEMENT FUND TO CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SW278; AUTHORIZING THE
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS TO EXECUTE ALL
CHANGE ORDERS; AND AUTHORIZING THE
EXPENDITURE OF ALL AVAILABLE CONTINGENCY
FUNDS IN ANAMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $60,000
WHEREAS, on June 3, 2016, engineering staff prepared the contract documents
and advertised the project; and
WHEREAS,the Director of Development Services has reviewed the proposed
project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has
determined that the project qualifiesfora Categorical Exemption pursuant to State
CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 Class 1 (Existing Facilities) and /or Section 15303
Class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures) of the California
Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; and
WHEREAS, On June29, 2016,the Director of Public Works received seven(7)
sealedbids for the Max Field Pump Station Reconstruction Project (CIP No. SW278);
and
WHEREAS, the seven(7) bids are as follows:
CONTRACTORBID AMOUNT
Just Construction, Inc. San Diego, California$398,631.00
Willkom Inc. National City, California$476,562.00
Mode Engineering Laguna Niguel, California$478,650.00
A.B. Hashmi, Inc. San Diego, California$479,475.00
Blue Pacific Engineering & Construction San Diego, $497,100.00
California
Charles King Company, Inc. Signal Hill, California$597,275.00
NEWest Construction Company, Inc. San Diego, $663,239.00
California
WHEREAS, the low bid submitted by Just Construction, Inc. is above the
Engineers estimate of $393,500 by $5,131 (approximately 1.30%); and
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 74
Resolution No. 2015-_____
Page 2
WHEREAS, staff has reviewed the low bid and recommends awarding the
contract to Just Construction, Inc. of San Diego, California; and
WHEREAS, Just Construction, Inc.is currently an active licensed Class A
General Engineering Contractor (License No. 968910) and has performed similar work
in the City with satisfactory performance; and
WHEREAS, in the City Council Policy No. 574-01, the maximum aggregated
contract increase that maybe approved by the Director of Public Works for the SW278
project is $30,904.17; and
WHEREAS, approval of the resolution would increase the Director of Public
Worksauthority to approve change orders as necessary, without further City Council
approval, in an amount not to exceed the contingency amount of $60,000
(approximately 15% of the contract); and
WHEREAS, the transfer and appropriation of $320,000from Sewer Facility
Replacement Fundinto SW278is recommended in order to providesufficient fundsfor
construction costs associated with this project; and
WHEREAS, a breakdown of construction costs is as follows:
FUNDS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION
A.Contract Amount
$398,631.00
B.Contingency(Approximately 15% of Contract)
$60,000.00
C.Construction Inspection, Design and Land Survey Staff
$100,000.00
Costs
D.Material Testing
$12,716.00
TOTAL FUNDS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION$571,347.00
Funding Source
Sewer Facility Replacement Fund$251,347.00
Sewer Facility Replacement Fund (Appropriation)$320,000.00
Total Funding$571,347.00
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVEDby the City Council of the City of Chula
Vista, that it does hereby accept bids; award a contract for theMax Field Pump Station
Reconstruction Project(CIPNo. SW278) projecttoJust Construction, Inc.in the
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 75
Resolution No. 2015-_____
Page 3
amount of$398,631, a copy of such contract shall be kept on file in the Office of the City
Clerk.
BEIT FURTHER RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, that
it does authorize and direct the City Manager or his authorized representative to
execute the contract.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista
does hereby appropriate $320,000from the Sewer Facility Replacement Fundto Capital
Improvement Project SW278to cover for Construction Inspection, Design, Land
Surveying staff costs and material testing associated with this project.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista
does hereby waive Council Policy 574-01 and authorize the Director of Public Works to
approve change orders, as necessary, and expend all available contingency funds in an
amount not to exceed $60,000.
Presented byApproved as to form by
______________________________________________________
RichardA. HopkinsGlen R. Googins
Director of Public Works City Attorney
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 76
City of Chula Vista
Staff Report
File#:16-0358, Item#: 6.
RESOLUTIONOFTHECITYCOUNCILOFTHECITYOFCHULAVISTAAPPROVING
CONSTRUCTIONCHANGEORDERSFORSLFIV-MILLENIA,LLCFORTHECONSTRUCTIONOF
TRAFFICSIGNALIMPROVEMENTSINTHEMILLENIAPROJECTANDPROVIDING
TRANSPORTATIONDEVELOPMENTIMPACTFEEANDTRAFFICSIGNALFEECREDITFOR
ELIGIBLE EXPENSES
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Council adopt the resolution.
SUMMARY
SLFIV-Millenia,LLC,theownersoftheMilleniaprojecthaveconstructedanumberoftrafficsignals
andportionsoffuturetrafficsignalswithintheMilleniaproject,andwillconstructothersignalsand
portionsofsignalsaspartoftheremainingphasesofdevelopmentintheproject.Theresolution
reimbursesthedeveloperbyprovidingdevelopmentfeecreditforeligibletrafficsignalworkand
appurtenances.ThecreditwillbethroughtheCity’sTransportationDevelopmentImpactFee(TDIF)
Program and the City’s Traffic Signal Impact Fee Program.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Environmental Notice
Theactivityisnota“Project”asdefinedunderSection15378oftheCaliforniaEnvironmentalQuality
ActStateGuidelines;therefore,pursuanttoStateGuidelinesSection15060(c)(3)noenvironmental
reviewisrequired.Notwithstandingtheforegoing,theactivitywasadequatelycoveredinpreviously
adopted/certifiedFinalSecondTierEnvironmentalImpactReport,EIR07-01forOtayRanchEastern
Urban Center (EUC) Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan.
Environmental Determination
TheproposedactivityhasbeenreviewedforcompliancewiththeCaliforniaEnvironmentalQuality
Act(CEQA)andithasbeendeterminedthattheactivityisnota“Project”asdefinedunderSection
15378ofthestateCEQAGuidelinesbecauseitinvolvesacontinuingadministrativeactivity,which
willnotresultinapotentiallysignificanteffectontheenvironment;therefore,pursuanttoSection
15060(c)(3)oftheStateCEQAGuidelines,theactivityisnotsubjecttoCEQA.Notwithstandingthe
foregoing,ithasalsobeendeterminedthattheconstructionofthetrafficsignalsandconduitsinthe
Milleniadevelopmentwasadequatelycoveredinpreviouslyadopted/certifiedFinalSecondTier
EnvironmentalImpactReport,EIR07-01forOtayRanchEasternUrbanCenter(EUC)Sectional
Planning Area (SPA) Plan. Thus, no further environmental review is required.
City of Chula VistaPage 1 of 5Printed on 8/4/2016
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 77
File#:16-0358, Item#: 6.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
N/A
DISCUSSION
SLFIV-Millenia,LLC,theownersoftheMilleniaprojecthaveconstructedanumberoftrafficsignals
andportionsoffuturetrafficsignalswithintheMilleniaprojectandarerequestingreimbursementfor
theirexpensesrelatedtothiswork.Thedeveloperwillconstructothersignalsandportionsofsignals
aspartoftheremainingphasesofdevelopmentintheproject.Someofthesesignalsarerequiredto
managethevehiculartrafficexpectedonMillennia’sstreetsystemandtheborderingarterialstreets
ofBirchRoadandEastlakeParkway.Thereareothertrafficsignalswhichareservingaprimaryrole
forsignalpreemptionandpriorityforSANDAG’sBusRapidTransit(BRT)line.Someappurtenances
ofthesignals,foundationsforsignalstandards,electrical&communicationconduits,pull-boxes,etc.,
areconstructedbeforethesignalsaremadefullyoperationalaspartoftheinitialstreetconstruction
inordertoavoidhavingtotrenchanddamagethestreetswhenthedeveloper,SANDAGand/orthe
Citycompletesthesignalsinthenearfuture.Thedeveloperhasprovidedatableandmapofthe
project area with each signalized intersection identified by reference number (Attachment # 1).
InaccordancewiththeChulaVistaTDIFProgram,trafficsignalsonmajorroadwaysidentifiedwithin
theTDIFprogram,areeligibleforTDIFcreditoncetheCityhasauditedtheexpenses.Ifthesignalis
notonaTDIFroadway,eligibleexpensesforsignalsthatmeetTrafficWarrantscanbecredited
throughtheTrafficSignalImpactFeeProgram.Thedeveloperhassubmittedalistofseveral
locations whereby credit will be through a combination of one or both of these impact fee programs.
AspartoftheimplementationoftheCity’sTDIFandTrafficSignalImpactFeePrograms,staff
evaluatesreimbursementrequestsfromdevelopersintheCitytoensurethatallcostsarequalifying
costsundertheCity’srespectivefeeprograms.ThedevelopersoftheMilleniaprojecthave
requested reimbursement for the following facilities:
1.Workdonebyachangeorderintheamountof$278,801.69fortrafficsignalsatthe
intersectionofEastlakeParkway/StylusStreet(location#9)andatEastlakeParkway/BRT
Guideway (location #13).
2.Workdonebyachangeorderintheamountof$91,468forBRTrequiredtrafficsignalconduits
atthetwointersectionsofOrionAvenue/NortherlyDriveway(location#10)andattheBRT
Guideway/SolsticeStreet(location#11),andappurtenancesplacedforthefutureregionalBRT
line signals.
Request 1.Eastlake Parkway: at Stylus Street (#9) and at BRT Guideway (#13)
Thisrequestisforreimbursementofthreesignalstandardsandmastarmsinstalledinandaround
theintersectionofStylusStreetandtheBRTGuideway.Inadditiontoprovidingcontrolsfor
pedestriancrossingsofStylusStreetandtheBRTGuideway,thesignalstandardpolesandmast
armsalsoareintendedtoprovidetrafficcontrolfortheBRTservice.Theexpensesrelatedtothe
BRTGuidewayarenotTDIFeligibleandwillbereimbursedthroughtheTrafficSignalImpactFee
Program.PertheTDIFpolicy,sincehalfoftheintersectionapproachesareonaTDIFfacility
(EastlakeParkway),thereimbursementofeligibleexpenseswillbesplit50%TDIFand50%Traffic
Signal Fee Program.
City of Chula VistaPage 2 of 5Printed on 8/4/2016
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 78
File#:16-0358, Item#: 6.
Attachment2showsaquotedChangeOrderpriceof$201,000(item6)forinstallationofthesignalat
EastlakeParkway/StylusStreet(location#9).Additionally,thesameattachmentincludestwo
additionalChangeOrderitems,4($45,000)and5($21,000)forundergroundingconduittocrossthe
BRTguideway,and,foundationwork.ThisworkalsoincludedcommunicationsconduitsfortheCity
andMTS.Thetotalconstructioncostsubmittedis$267,826.69whichincludesanadditionalchange
orderof$826.69foradditionalsignalequipment.Therelatedengineeringcostsare$10,975.00.The
total reimbursement sought for Request 1 is $278,801.69.
TheCity’spoliciesforreimbursementrequirethatallprojectsbecompetitivelybidandthatany
projectwithachangeorderexceeding$50,000bebroughttotheCityCouncilforapproval.
ReimbursementRequest1isachangeorderwhichwasaddedbythedevelopertoanexisting,
competitivelybid,Milleniasignalinstallationcontract.Thesignalmodificationattheintersectionof
EastlakeParkway/StylusStreet(location#9)isalsoinverycloseproximitytothesignalwiththeBRT
Guideway(location#13)andassuch,bothsignalizedlocationsareoperatingasonelarger
intersection with additional signal equipment necessary for the two locations.
Thedevelopersubmittedexpensesforreimbursementtotaling$278,801.69.Aftercarefulreview,
staffdeterminedacostof$206,975tobeconsistentwithothersimilarlyconfiguredsignalsinMillenia.
Baseduponthiscomparison,staffrecommendsreimbursementfortheconstructioncostsofthe
traffic signal at Eastlake Parkway/Stylus Street in the amount of $206,975.
Theappropriateallocationforthisreimbursementis$103,487inTDIFcredit,and$103,488inTraffic
Signal Fee credit, for a total reimbursement in the amount of $206,975.
Request2.BusRapidTransitcorridorsignalsat:OrionAvenue/NorthDriveway(#10)andSolstice
Street (#11)
AspartoftheconstructionoftheplannedstreetsinMillenia,thedevelopersarerequired,pursuantto
aspecificmitigationmeasureintheprojectEIR,toplacecommunicationconduitsalongthecorridor,
notjustatintersections.MitigationMeasure4.3-15(Attachment#3)isintendedtofacilitatethe
futureconstructionofBRTcorridortrafficsignalsbySANDAGaswellasprovidingcommunication
conduit for the City.
Itisinthepublic’sbestinteresttohavetheconduitinstalledwiththeinitialstreetinfrastructurenowin
ordertopreventfuturestreettrenchinganddisruptionwhenBRTserviceisinitiated.Theconduitwill
beownedbytheCityandavailablefortheCity’suse,whichcouldincludeplacinginfrastructure
neededtosupporttheSmartCitiesInitiativeandsignalsystemscommunications.Additionally,the
CitycanpursueanagreementwithSANDAG/MTSfortheiruseoftheconduitswhentheycomplete
the BRT signal construction.
Thedeveloperisrequestingreimbursementforconduitinstallationattwosignalizedintersections
neededfortheBRTservice(Attachment#4).Therequestincludes$53,243forintersection#10and
$38,225forintersection#11,foratotalreimbursementrequestof$91,468.Theabovetotalsinclude
engineering,administrationandconstructioncostsfortheconduitinstallationsasidentifiedin
Attachment#5.Sincethemitigationmeasureonlyrequiredconduitinstallation,noadditional
reimbursementrequestswillbeacceptedforthesetwointersectionsastheremainingworkwillbe
completed and funded by SANDAG in their BRT projects.
City of Chula VistaPage 3 of 5Printed on 8/4/2016
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 79
File#:16-0358, Item#: 6.
Staffrecommendsapprovingtherequestedreimbursementof$91,468.00fromtheTrafficSignal
Impact Fee Program.
Thefollowingtablesummarizesthedeveloper’sreimbursementrequestsandstaff’s
recommendations.
Qualifying FacilityDeveloperAllocationStaff
RequestRecom
mendati
on
Traffic Signals at Eastlake$278,801.69TDIF50%$103,487 TDIF
Parkway/Stylus Street (#9)$103,488 TS fee
$206,975 Total
TS fee50%
BRT corridor/Orion Ave$53,243.00TDIF0%N/A $53,243 TS fee
(#10) Signal Conduits
TS fee100%
BRT corridor/Solstice Ave$38,225.00TDIF0%N/A $38,225 TS fee
(#11) Signal Conduits
TS fee100%
Totals$370,269.69$298,44
3
AllreimbursementswillbemadeviatheissuanceofTransportationDevelopmentImpactFee(TDIF)
and/orTrafficSignalImpactFeecreditsonly.Thedevelopermaytransfercreditstomerchant
builderswithintheMilleniaproject.Nocashpaymentswillbemadetothedeveloperfromthefee
programs.
DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT
StaffhasreviewedthepropertyholdingsoftheCityCouncilmembersandhasfoundnoproperty
holdingswithin500feetoftheboundariesofthepropertywhichisthesubjectofthisaction.
Consequently,thisitemdoesnotpresentadisqualifyingrealproperty-relatedfinancialconflictof
interestunderCaliforniaCodeofRegulationsTitle2,section18702.2(a)(11),forpurposesofthe
Political Reform Act (Cal. Gov’t Code §87100,et seq.).
Staffisnotindependentlyaware,andhasnotbeeninformedbyanyCouncilmember,ofanyother
fact that may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter.
LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS
TheCity’sStrategicPlanhasfivemajorgoals:OperationalExcellence,EconomicVitality,Healthy
Community,StrongandSecureNeighborhoodsandaConnectedCommunity.Thisitemlinkstothe
citywidegoalsofEconomicVitalitysinceitpromotesandsupportsdevelopmentofqualitymaster
planned communities and promotes an environment for residents and businesses to prosper.
CURRENT YEAR FISCAL IMPACT
City of Chula VistaPage 4 of 5Printed on 8/4/2016
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 80
File#:16-0358, Item#: 6.
Allinitialcostsfortheinstallationoftrafficsignalequipmentandappurtenanceshavebeenborneby
thedeveloper.On-goingmaintenancecostsareincludedaspartoftheannualPublicWorks
Operations operating budget for the maintenance of signals.
ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT
Nominaltrafficsignal,electrical,maintenanceandoperationscostsinPublicWorksDepartment
budget
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment 1 - Millenia Traffic Signal Plat & Traffic Signal Table (2-pages)
Attachment 2 - Select Electric Bid for BRT Guideway at Solstice & Eastlake/Stylus
Attachment 3 - Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program dated Sept. 2009 (excerpt)
Attachment 4 - Millenia Traffic Signal Reimbursement Request Table
Attachment 5 - Millenia Traffic Signal Summary (per City audit) dated July 12, 2016
Staff Contact: Francisco X. Rivera, Principal Civil Engineer
J:\\Engineer\\TRAFFIC\\TDIF\\Millenia TDIF Credit\\Agenda Millenia TS TDIF reimbursements 7-26-16 fxr.doc
City of Chula VistaPage 5 of 5Printed on 8/4/2016
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 81
0 ¦¤ 82
Packet
!¦¤£
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ
0 ¦¤ 83
Pedestrian required poles installed. Will be completed by SANDAG.
Complete-As builts being reviewed by InspectionsComplete-As builts being reviewed by InspectionsComplete-As builts being reviewed by InspectionsComplete-As builts being reviewed by InspectionsComplet
e-As builts being reviewed by InspectionsComplete-As builts being reviewed by InspectionsComplete-As builts being reviewed by InspectionsComplete-As builts being reviewed by InspectionsComplete-As
builts being reviewed by Inspections
Conduits in. Will be completed by SANDAG.
Conduits in. Will be completed by SANDAGConduits in. Will be completed by SANDAG
Status
Design 90%. SANDAG will complete
Traffic Signal Status
Millenia
Pedestrian Crossing at BRT Knuckle
Orion and Northerly Driveway
Eastlake Parkway and Optima
Eastlake Parkway and Strata
Eastlake Parkway and Stylus
Eastlake Parkway and BRT
Location
Millenia and Artisan
Millenia and Stylus
Birch and Millenia
Orion and Artisan
Strata and Orion
BRT and Solstice
Orion and Avant
Birch and Orion
Packet
No.
1011121314
123456789
!¦¤£
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 84
0 ¦¤ 85
Packet
!¦¤£
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ
0 ¦¤ 86
July 7, 2016
6,563.0010,497.656,198.194,940.734,418.5732,618.14
City Fees
$$$$
$$
3,360.003,055.004,106.003,852.002,673.002,673.003,368.0023,087.00
Bonds
$ $ $ $ $ $ $
$
59,222.83158,148.48115,186.23205,629.26159,105.0052,025.04169,009.00202,009.00278,801.6953,243.0038,225.001,490,604.53
---
$ $ $
Total
$ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $
$
9,923.4810,497.004,053.513,368.0027,841.99
---------
Capped at 2% of Constuction
$ $ $ $
$ $ $ $
$
Administration
$ $ $
$ $
Traffic Signal Reimbursement Request
2,255.0010,225.009,500.0010,260.001,475.002,255.006,009.006,009.0010,975.001,475.0010,225.0070,663.00
---
$ $ $
Millenia
Engineering
$ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $
C:\\Users\\GRANIC~1\\AppData\\Local\\Temp\\BCL Technologies\\easyPDF 7\\@BCL@3006AA98\\@BCL@3006AA98
56,967.83138,000.0095,189.23191,315.75157,630.0049,770.04163,000.00196,000.00267,826.6948,400.0028,000.001,392,099.54
---
$ $ $
Construction
$ $ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $
$
Eastlake Parkway and Stylus and Stylus and Guideway
Pedestrian Crossing at BRT Knuckle
Orion and Northerly Driveway
Eastlake Parkway and Optima
Eastlake Parkway and Strata
Eastlake Parkway and BRT
Millenia and Artisan
Millenia and Stylus
Birch and Millenia
Orion and Artisan
Strata and Orion
Orion and Avant
BRT and Solstice
Birch and Orion
Location
Packet
!¦¤£
9 & 13
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ
No.
1011121314
12345678
Attachment 4 Millenia Traffic Signals Reimbursement Summary 7/21/2016
ContractEligibleNonEligibleApprovedAllocationTotalApproved
Signal Description AmountsAmountsAmountsTDIFTSFundReimbursement
1BirchandOrion50%50%
(a)Construction$57,271.49$56,967.83$303.66$28,483.92$28,483.92$56,967.83
Engineerin$2,255.0$2,255.0$$1,127.5$1,127.5$2,255.0
g00000
Admin$$$$$$
SubTotal$59,526.4$59,222.8$303.6$29,611.4$29,611.4$59,222.8
936223
2OrionandArtisan0%100%
Construction$138,000.0$138,000.0$$$138,000.0$138,000.0
0000
Engineerin$10,225.0$10,225.0$$$10,225.0$10,225.0
g0000
Admin9,923.4$$9,923.4$$$9,923.4$9,923.4
8888
SubTotal$158,148.4$158,148.4$$$158,148.4$158,148.4
8888
3EastlakeParkwayandOptima50%50%
Construction$95,189.23$95,189.23$$47,594.62$47,594.62$95,189.23
Engineerin$9,500.0$9,500.0$$4,750.0$4,750.0$9,500.0
g00000
Admin$10,497.0$10,497.0$$5,248.5$5,248.5$10,497.0
00000
SubTotal$115,186.2$115,186.2$$57,593.1$57,593.1$115,186.2
33223
4EastlakeParkwayandStrata67%33%
Construction$191,315.75$191,315.75$$128,181.55$63,134.2$191,315.75
0
Engineerin$10,260.0$10,260.0$$6,874.2$3,385.8$10,260.0
g00000
(b)Admin4,106.0$$536.98$3,569.02$359.78$177.20$536.98
0
SubTotal$205,681.7$202,112.7$3,569.0$135,415.5$66,697.2$202,112.7
532303
5StrataandOrion0%100%
Construction$157,630.0$157,630.0$$$157,630.0$157,630.0
0000
Engineerin$1,475.0$1,475.0$$$1,475.0$1,475.0
g0000
(b)Admin10,050.19$$$10,050.19$$$
SubTotal$169,155.1$159,105.0$10,050.1$$159,105.0$159,105.0
90900
6BirchandMillenia75%25%
Construction$49,770.0$49,770.0$$37,327.53$12,442.51$49,770.0
444
Engineerin$2,255.0$2,255.0$$1,691.25$563.75$2,255.0
g000
Admin$$$$$$
SubTotal$52,025.0$52,025.0$$39,018.7$13,006.2$52,025.0
44864
7MilleniaandArtisan50%50%
Construction$163,000.0$163,000.0$$81,500.0$81,500.0$163,000.0
00000
Engineerin$6,009.0$6,009.0$$3,004.5$3,004.5$6,009.0
g00000
(b)Admin7,613.73$$$7,613.73$$$
SubTotal$176,622.7$169,009.0$7,613.7$84,504.5$84,504.5$169,009.0
303000
8MilleniaandStylu50%50%
s
Construction$196,000.0$196,000.0$$98,000.0$98,000.0$196,000.0
00000
Engineerin$6,009.0$6,009.0$$3,004.5$3,004.5$6,009.0
g00000
(b)Admin7,091.57$$$7,091.57$$$
SubTotal$209,100.5$202,009.0$7,091.5$101,004.5$101,004.5$202,009.0
707000
9EastlakeParkwayandStylus50%50%
(c)Construction$267,826.6$196,000.0$267,826.6$98,000.0$98,000.0$196,000.0
909000
Engineerin$10,975.0$10,975.0$10,975.0$5,487.5$5,487.5$10,975.0
g000000
Admin$$$$$$
SubTotal$278,801.6$206,975.0$278,801.6$103,487.5$103,487.5$206,975.0
909000
10OrionandNortherlyDrivewa0%100%
y
(d)Construction$48,400.0$48,400.0$48,400.0$$48,400.0$48,400.0
00000
Engineerin$1,475.0$1,475.0$1,475.0$$1,475.0$1,475.0
g00000
Admin$3,368.0$3,368.0$3,368.0$$3,368.0$3,368.0
00000
SubTotal$53,243.0$53,243.0$53,243.0$$53,243.0$53,243.0
00000
11BRTandSolstice0%100%
(d)Construction$28,000.0$28,000.0$28,000.0$$28,000.0$28,000.0
00000
Engineerin$10,225.0$10,225.0$10,225.0$$10,225.0$10,225.0
g00000
Admin$$$$$$
SubTotal$38,225.0$38,225.0$38,225.0$$38,225.0$38,225.0
00000
12OrionandAvant(Future)
Construction$$$$$$
Engineerin$1,475.0$$1,475.0$$$
g00
Admin$3,547.93$$3,547.93$$$
SubTotal$5,022.9$$5,022.9$$$
33
13EastlakeParkwayandBRT0%100%
Construction$$$$$$
(e)Engineerin$1,475.0$1,475.0$$$
g00
Admin$$$$$$
SubTotal$1,475.0$$1,475.0$$$
00
14PedestrianCrossingatBRTKnuckle(Future)
Construction$$$$$$
Engineerin$$$$$$
g
Admin$$$$$$
SubTotal$$$$$$
GrandTotal$1,522,214.10$1,415,261.31$405,395.79$550,635.34$864,625.97$1,415,261.31
CreditSummary
ConstructionCosts$1,320,272.85
Engineering$70,663.00
Administration$24,325.46
TotalApprovedReimbursement$1,415,261.31
CreditforTrafficSignalsRec'don12/3/14$(148,500.00)
CreditforTrafficSignalsRec'don8/20/14$(238,003.83)
CreditsDuePendingCityAcceptance$1,028,757.48
bƚƷĻƭ
(a)SelectElectricInvoice31034intheamountof$303.66notapproved;ChargewasforR&Rofpullboxbrokenduringgrading
(b)Eligibleadmincostsapprovedat2%ofconstructioncostsbasedonTDIFProjectCostEstimates(2%of$1,047,872.85=$20,957.46)
(c)Signalswerenotpartoftheoriginalcontract;Addedasachangeorder.Staffrecommendsapprovalintheamountofasimilarlyconfigured,competetively
bidsignal.Costsforsignals9and13werecombinedsincebothsignalizedlocationsareoperatingasonelargerintersectionwithadditionalsignalequipment
necessaryforbothlocations.
(d)UndergroundconduitonlyforfutureBRTsignals.NofuturereimburesmenttobepaidbytheCity;Developeragreestoseekreimbursementforany
additionalBRTrelatedsignalexpendituresdirectlyfromSANDAG.
(e)Developerisnotseekingreimubursementforthisitem.
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 87
RESOLUTION NO. __________
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING CONSTRUCTION CHANGE
ORDERS FOR SLF IV-MILLENIA, LLC FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS IN
THE MILLENIA PROJECT AND PROVIDING
TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE AND
TRAFFIC SIGNAL FEE CREDIT FOR ELIGIBLE EXPENSES
WHEREAS,SLF IV-Millenia, LLC(Developer), the owners of the Millenia project have
constructed a number of traffic signals and portions of future traffic signals within the Millenia
projectandwill construct other signals and portions of signals as part of the remaining phases of
development in the project; and
WHEREAS,the Developer has submitted two reimbursement requests to the City:
Request # 1 in the amount of $280,276.69 for Eastlake Parkway at Stylus Street (location #9) and
at the Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)Guideway (location #13) and Request # 2 in the amount of
$91,468 for BRT corridor signals at Orion Avenue/North Driveway (location #10) and Solstice
Street (location #11); and
WHEREAS, the Resolution reimburses the developer by providing development fee
credit for eligible traffic signal work and appurtenances through the City’s Transportation
Development Impact Fee (TDIF) Program and the City’s Traffic Signal Impact Fee Program;
and
WHEREAS,in accordance withthe Chula Vista TDIF Program, traffic signals on major
roadways identified within the TDIF program, are eligible for TDIF credit once the City has
audited the expenses; and
WHEREAS, if the signal is not on a TDIF roadway, eligible expenses can be credited
through the Traffic Signal Impact Fee Program; and
WHEREAS, as part of the implementation of the City’s TDIF and Traffic Signal Impact
Fee Programs, staff evaluates reimbursement requests from developers in the City to ensure that
all costs are qualifying costs under the City’s respective fee programs; and
WHEREAS,in accordance withthe TDIF policy, since Eastlake Parkway is a TDIF
facility and Stylus Street is not, the reimbursement of TDIF eligible expenses will be split at 50%
TDIF and 50% Traffic Signal Impact Fee since half of the intersection approaches are on a TDIF
facility; and
WHEREAS,the expenses related to the BRT Transit Guideway are not TDIF eligible and
will be credited only through the Traffic Signal Impact Fee Program; and
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 88
WHEREAS, the signal at Eastlake Parkway/Stylus Street (location #9) was quoted a
price of $201,000 plus a change order for $826.69 for traffic signal equipment related to wiring
and a signal controller (Exhibit 1)andthe same exhibitrefers to two bid items, totaling $66,000
(Bid Items #4 & #5), for $45,000 and $21,000, respectively for undergrounding conduit to cross
the BRT transit guideway plus foundation work at the Stylus Street location for a total
construction cost of $267,826.69; and
WHEREAS, there are also engineering costs of $10,975.00 related to this work, as such,
the total reimbursement sought by the Developer for Request # 1 is $278,801.69; and
WHEREAS, the City’s policies for reimbursement require that all projects be
competitively bid and that any project with a change order exceeding $50,000 be brought to the
City Council for approvalandreimbursement Request #1 is a change order which was added by
the developer to an existing, competitivelybid Millenia signal contract; and
WHEREAS, the signal modification at the intersection of Eastlake Parkway/Stylus Street
(location #9) is also in very close proximity to the signal with the BRT Guideway (location #13)
and as such, both signalized locations are operating as one larger intersection with additional
signal equipment necessary for the two locations; and
WHEREAS, based on the above, any BRT related underground equipment for signal
systems which are being installed in advance of the BRT system operating willbe reimbursed
via the Traffic Signal Impact Fee; and
WHEREAS, although the Developer submitted expenses totaling $278,801.69, for signal
#9, it should be noted that, based on the cost of comparable signals, staff recommends
reimbursement for the construction costs of the traffic signal at Eastlake Parkway/Stylus Street
(location # 9) in the amount of $206,975because aftercareful review, staff found this amount to
be consistent with other similarly configured signals in Millenia; and
WHEREAS, the $206,975 reimbursement for location # 9 shall be $103,487 in credit
from the TDIF Program and $103,488 in credit from the Traffic Signal Impact Fee Program; and
WHEREAS, based on the above, the total eligiblereimbursement total for Request # 1
will be $206,975; and
WHEREAS, the Developer’s Request # 2is for reimbursement of signal related expenses
on the Bus Rapid Transit corridor signals at Orion Avenue/North Driveway (location #10) and
Solstice Street (location #11); and
WHEREAS, as part of the construction of the planned streets in Millenia, the developers
are required, pursuant to a specific mitigation measure in the project Environmental Impact
Report (EIR), to place conduits along the corridor, not just at intersections, this requirement is
intended tofacilitate the future construction of BRT corridor traffic signals by SANDAGand
due to the fact that the development phasing and street construction is often well in advance of
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 89
Resolution No.
Page 3
SANDAG’s planned service, SANDAG will not reimburse the Developer for those future
facilities early; and
WHEREAS, should the Developer have wanted to preserve their right to future
reimbursement, they would have had to publicly bid, at prevailing wage rates, the full street
improvements, which would have resulted in cost increasesto the Developer well in excess of
the requested reimbursement amounts; and
WHEREAS, it is in the public’s best interest to have the conduit installed with the initial
street infrastructure now in order to avoid having the street pavement section trenched in the
future when BRT service is planned and the traffic signals are neededsinceit is more cost
effective and less disruptive to the public to install these facilities nowandthe conduit which is
placed will be owned by the City and available for the City’s use, which could include placing
infrastructure needed to support the Smart Cities Initiative and signal systems communications;
and
WHEREAS, the City can pursue reimbursement from SANDAG for use of the conduits
when SANDAG completes the BRT signal construction; and
WHEREAS, the Developer is requesting reimbursement for two signalized intersections
needed for the BRT service whichincludes $53,243 for intersection #10 and $38,225 for
intersection #11, for a total reimbursement request of $91,468forengineering, administration
and construction costs; and
WHEREAS, anyfuture work related to these signalized locations will not be reimbursed
by the City of Chula Vista since they are needed for the BRT serviceso no additional
reimbursement requests will be accepted for these two intersections as they will be completed
and funded by SANDAG; and
WHEREAS, staff is recommending the approval of the requested reimbursement
“Request # 2” in the amount of $91,468, to be allocated to the Traffic Signal Impact Fee
Program.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula
Vista, that it hereby approves construction change orders for SLF IV-Millenia, LLC for the
construction of traffic signal improvements in the Millenia project and providing Transportation
Development Impact Fee and Traffic SignalImpactFee credit for eligible expenses.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista,that it
hereby approves Developer ReimbursementRequest # 1 in the amount of $208,450 of which
$103,487 will be credited from the Transportation Development Impact FeeProgram and
$104,963 will be credited from the Traffic Signal Impact Fee Program.
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 90
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, that it
herebyapproves Developer Reimbursement Request # 2in the amount of $91,468creditedfrom
the Traffic Signal Impact Fee Program.
Presented by:Approved as to form by:
Richard A HopkinsGlen R. Googins
Director of Public WorksCityAttorney
Exhibit 1
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 91
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 92
City of Chula Vista
Staff Report
File#:16-0374, Item#: 7.
RESOLUTIONOFTHECITYCOUNCILOFTHECITYOFCHULAVISTAAPPROVINGTHE
FOURTHAMENDMENTTOTHEAGREEMENTBETWEENTHECITYOFCHULAVISTAAND
ADVANTAGESENTRYANDPROTECTION,INC.TOPROVIDETRANSPORTATIONSERVICES
FOR PRISONERS, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE SAME
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Council adopt the resolution.
SUMMARY
Afterextensiveresearchandcarefulanalysis,thePoliceDepartmentrequeststoamendthe
compensationrateandtermoftheexistingagreementwithAdvantageSentryandProtection,Inc.for
prisoner transportation services.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Environmental Notice
Theactivityisnota“Project”asdefinedunderSection15378oftheCaliforniaEnvironmentalQuality
ActStateGuidelines;therefore,pursuanttoStateGuidelinesSection15060(c)(3)noenvironmental
review is required.
Environmental Determination
N/A
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
Not Applicable
DISCUSSION
InAugust2012,thePoliceDepartmententeredintoanAgreementwithAdvantageSentryand
Protection,Inc.(ASAP)toprovidetransportationservicesforprisonersfollowingCityCouncil
approvalinResolution2012-153.TheOriginalAgreementwasforaone-yearterm,August1,2012
toJuly31,2013,andallowedforfive(5)additionalone-yearextensionsbymutualagreementofboth
parties.Insubsequentyears,thepartieshaveadministrativelyexecutedthreeoffiveallowableone-
year extensions of the Original Agreement.
InJune2015,ASAPcontactedthePoliceDepartmentandrequestedafourthextensionofthe
OriginalAgreement,andalsorequestedanincreaseintheirhourlyratefrom$28.00perhourto
$35.00perhour.ASAPrequestedtheincreasebasedonincreasingcosts,includingalegislative
increaseinthehourlyminimumwage.Subsequently,thePoliceDepartmentconductedresearchto
evaluateASAP’sproposedhourlyrateandcompareditwiththatofprovidersofferingequivalent
City of Chula VistaPage 1 of 3Printed on 8/4/2016
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 93
File#:16-0374, Item#: 7.
serviceswithintheSanDiegoregion.Basedonthatresearch,thePoliceDepartmentdetermined
thateveryotheravailableserviceproviderintheregion,exceptone,wassignificantlymore
expensivethatASAP’sproposedrate.Further,theonevendorthatcouldmatchorbeatASAP’s
proposedratealreadyhasaseparatecontractwiththePoliceDepartmentforotherservices.That
particularvendorhasnotbeenresponsivetorepeatedrequestsforinformationand,asaresult,has
beendifficulttomanage.Therefore,thePoliceDepartmentdoesnotconsiderthatvendora
reasonable alternative.
Asaresult,thePoliceDepartmentandASAPnowmutuallydesiretoextendtheOriginalAgreement
forafourthone-yearextension,andtoamendthehourlyratefrom$28.00perhourto$35.00per
hour.
DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT
Staffhasreviewedthedecisioncontemplatedbythisactionandhasdeterminedthatitisnotsite-
specificandconsequently,the500-footrulefoundinCaliforniaCodeofRegulationsTitle2,section
18702.2(a)(11),isnotapplicabletothisdecisionforpurposesofdeterminingadisqualifyingreal
property-relatedfinancialconflictofinterestunderthePoliticalReformAct(Cal.Gov'tCode§87100,
et seq.).
Staffisnotindependentlyaware,andhasnotbeeninformedbyanyCityCouncilmember,ofany
other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter.
LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS
TheCity’sStrategicPlanhasfivemajorgoals:OperationalExcellence,EconomicVitality,Healthy
Community,StrongandSecureNeighborhoodsandaConnectedCommunity.Thisamended
agreementimpactsthegoalsofOperationalExcellence,EconomicVitality,andStrongandSecure
Neighborhoods.Boththeexistingandproposedhourlyratesarelessexpensivethanallotherviable
serviceprovidersfoundintheregion.Throughtheuseofthistransportationcontract,policeofficers
arenotneededtotransportprisonersoutsidethecitylimitstoothercorrectionalinstitutions,freeing
thoseofficerstospendmoretimeonthestreetsofChulaVista.SinceFiscalYear2010/2011,this
transportationcontracthassavedpoliceofficersmorethan12,000hoursoftransportationtime.This
will continue to enhance the police department’s operations.
CURRENT YEAR FISCAL IMPACT
BecauseitisimpossibletopredicthowmanyarrestsChulaVistapoliceofficerswillmakeincurrent
andfuturefiscalyears,preciseestimationsofthenetfiscalimpactsofthisamendmentaredifficultto
determine.However,thePoliceDepartmentprojectsthefiscalimpactforFY2016/2017isestimated
tobe$28,350asaresultofASAP’shourlyrateincrease.ThePoliceDepartmentwillabsorbthis
additional cost in its FY 2016/2017 budget, resulting in no net fiscal impact to the General Fund.
ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT
ThisbeingthefourthoffivepossibleextensionstotheOriginalAgreement,onlyonemoreextension
isallowable.Thefiscalimpactof$28,350estimatedinFY2016/2017willbeincludedinthe
proposed FY 2017/2018 budget.
ATTACHMENTS
City of Chula VistaPage 2 of 3Printed on 8/4/2016
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 94
File#:16-0374, Item#: 7.
AttachmentA-FourthAmendmenttotheAgreementbetweentheCityofChulaVistaandAdvantage
Sentry and Protection, Inc. (ASAP) To Provide Transportation Services for Prisoners
Staff Contact: Phil Collum, Police Lieutenant, Jail Manager
City of Chula VistaPage 3 of 3Printed on 8/4/2016
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 95
RESOLUTION NO. __________
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVINGTHE FOURTH AMENDMENT
TO THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA AND ADVANTAGE SENTRY AND PROTECTION,
INC. TO PROVIDE TRANSPORTATION SERVICES FOR
PRISONERS, AND AUTHORIZINGTHE MAYOR TO
EXECUTE THE SAME
WHEREAS, the Police Department entered into an Agreement with Advantage Sentry
and Protection, Inc. (ASAP) to provide transportation services for prisonersin August 2012; and
WHEREAS, the Original Agreement was for a one-year term, August 1, 2012 to July 31,
2013, and allowed for five (5) additional one-year extensions by mutual agreement of the parties;
and
WHEREAS, in subsequent years City and ASAPhave administratively executed three (3)
of five (5) one-year extensions of the Original Agreement; and
WHEREAS, City and ASAPnow desire to extend the Original Agreement for a fourth
one-year extension; and
WHEREAS, ASAP requested an increase in their transportation rate from $28.00 per
hour to $35.00 per hour.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula
Vista does hereby approve the fourth amendment to the Agreement between the City of Chula
Vista and Advantage Sentry and Protection, Inc. to provide transportation services for prisoners,
in the form presented, with such minor modifications as may be required or approved by the City
Attorney, a copy of which shall be kept on file in the Office of the CityClerk,and authorizes and
directs the Mayor to execute same.
Presented byApproved as to form by
David BejaranoGlen R. Googins
Police ChiefCity Attorney
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 96
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 97
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 98
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 99
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 100
City of Chula Vista
Staff Report
File#:16-0314, Item#: 8.
CONSIDERATIONOFAPPROVINGANADDENDUMTOEIR07-01ANDAMENDMENTSTOTHE
EASTERNURBANCENTER(EUC)SECTIONALPLANNINGAREAPLANANDFORMBASED
CODETORELOCATETHEMILLENIAELEMENTARYSCHOOLSITE,DELETEAPORTIONOF
MONTAGEAVENUE,REVISEPARKINGRATESANDSTANDARDS,ANDCLARIFYTHE
APPROVALPROCESSFORTHEPARKINGMANAGEMENTPLAN,SUBSEQUENTPARKING
RATES, AND FUTURE STREET DELETIONS
A.RESOLUTIONOFTHECITYCOUNCILOFTHECITYOFCHULAVISTACONSIDERING
THEADDENDUM(IS-15-0003)TOEIR07-01ANDAPPROVINGAMENDMENTSTOTHE
EASTERNURBANCENTERSECTIONALPLANNINGAREA(SPA)PLANANDASSOCIATED
REGULATORYDOCUMENTSRELATINGTOTHERELOCATIONOFMILLENIA
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SITE AND DELETION OF A PORTION OF MONTAGE AVENUE
B.ORDINANCEOFTHECITYOFCHULAVISTAAPPROVINGAMENDMENTSTOTHE
EASTERNURBANCENTERPLANNEDCOMMUNITYDISTRICTREGULATIONSAND
DESIGNPLAN(FORMBASEDCODE)FOR207ACRESOFLANDINTHEEASTERN
URBANCENTERPORTIONOFTHEOTAYRANCHRELATINGTOTHERELOCATIONOF
THEMILLENIAELEMENTARYSCHOOLSITE,DELETIONOFAPORTIONOFMONTAGE
AVENUE,REVISINGTHEPARKINGRATESANDSTANDARDSANDCLARIFYINGTHE
APPROVALPROCESSFORTHEPARKINGMANAGEMENTPLAN,SUBSEQUENT
PARKING RATES, AND FUTURE STREET DELETIONS (FIRST READING)
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Council conduct the public hearing, adopt the resolution and place the ordinance on first reading.
SUMMARY
TheMilleniaproject(formerlyknownastheEasternUrbanCenter)includesapproximately207acres
oflandandislocatedalongtheSR125tollwaybetweenBirchRoadandthefutureHunte
Parkway/MainStreetextension(Attachment1).Theprojectisapprovedforapproximately3.5million
square feet of non-residential uses, and 2,983 multi-family housing units.
TheapprovedEUCSPAPlan(SPA)andFormBasedCode(FBC)currentlyproposetheprimary
locationoftheElementarySchoolsitetobewithintheSouth-Centralresidentialneighborhood
City of Chula VistaPage 1 of 9Printed on 8/4/2016
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 101
File#:16-0314, Item#: 8.
(District9).SLFIV/Millenia,LLC(“Applicant”)filedanapplicationtoamendtheapprovedSectional
PlanningArea(SPA)PlanandFormBasedCode(FBC)tomovetheschoolsitetoTentativeMap
(TM)Lot16intheMixedUseCivic/OfficeCoreDistrict(District5).TheSchoolDistricthasexpressed
apreferencefortheelementaryschooltobelocatedinDistrict5insteadofDistrict9duetoitsmore
central location and improved accessibility.
StaffisalsoseekingclarificationoftheDirectorofDevelopmentServices’authoritytoapprove,atan
administrativelevel,streetdeletionsintheMilleniaplanandtoapprovetheMilleniaParking
Management Plan. Both of these issues are discussed in more detail in the staff report.
As proposed, the Project will require amendments to the EUC SPA Plan, and FBC.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Environmental Notice
TheProjectwasadequatelycoveredinpreviouslyadoptedFinalSecondTierEnvironmentalImpact
Report,EIR07-01andonlyminortechnicalchangeswererequired;thereforeAddendumIS-15-0003
has been prepared.
Environmental Determination
TheDirectorofDevelopmentServiceshasreviewedtheproposedprojectforcompliancewiththe
CaliforniaEnvironmentalQualityAct(CEQA)andhasdeterminedthattheprojectwascoveredin
previouslyadoptedFinalSecondTierEnvironmentalImpactReport,EIR07-01.TheDirectorof
DevelopmentServiceshasdeterminedthatonlyminortechnicalchangesoradditionstothis
documentarenecessaryandthatnoneoftheconditionsdescribedinSection15162and15164of
theStateCEQAGuidelinescallingforthepreparationofasubsequentdocumenthaveoccurred;
therefore,theDirectorofDevelopmentServiceshaspreparedanaddendumtotheFinalSecondTier
Environmental Impact Report, EIR 07-01 (Attachment 2).
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
OnJuly13,2016,thePlanningCommissionconductedapublichearingandvoted\[4-0-3Anaya,
Fuentes,Gutierrezabsent\]thattheCityCounciladopttheResolutionconsideringtheAddendumto
theFinalSecondTierEnvironmentalImpactReport,EIR07-01(IS-15-0003)andadoptthe
OrdinanceapprovingthesecondamendmenttotheEasternUrbanCenter(EUC)SectionalPlanning
Area(SPA)PlanandFormBasedCodewiththechangethatfuturerevisionstoparkingrates(SPA
PlanParkingStandardsTableIII-A)shallrequirereviewandapprovalbyPlanningCommission,until
suchtimeastheParkingDistrictCounciltransfersfromtheMasterDevelopertotheCommunity
Association.StaffagreeswiththePlanningCommission’srecommendationandtheirrevisionis
reflected in the proposed amendments (Attachment 4).
DISCUSSION
SPA Plan and Form Based Code
TheadoptedSPAPlan,approvedonSeptember15,2009,establishesthevisionforMillenia,and
definesthelandusecharacterandmix,designcriteria,transportationsystem,andpublic
infrastructurerequirementsfortheproject.TheSPAPlanproposesaflexibleregulatoryframework
City of Chula VistaPage 2 of 9Printed on 8/4/2016
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 102
File#:16-0314, Item#: 8.
thatprovidesforavarietyofpossiblelandusescenariosforeachdistrictandisintendedtoallowthe
projecttorespondtomarketcycles.TheFBCincorporatesboththePCDistrictRegulationsandthe
VillageDesignPlanandisbasedontheconceptthattherelationshipbetweenbuildingsandthe
public realm is more important than distinctions in land-use types.
Milleniaisdividedinto10CommunityDistricts,andtheSPAcontainsaTableofRequirementsfor
eachDistrictthatidentifiesthedominantlanduse,numberofdwellingunits,non-residentialsquare
footage permitted (office and retail), building setbacks, and other requirements and limitations.
Relocation of the Millenia School Site
ThePublicFacilitiesSectionoftheSPAPlanstatesthattheprojected2,983residentialdwellingunits
willgenerateapproximately624elementarystudentsatfullbuild-outaccordingtotheChulaVista
Elementary School District (CVESD).
TheSPAplanapprovedbytheCityinSeptemberof2009includedtwopotentialschoolsites:A
preferredsiteintheCentralSouthernNeighborhoodDistrict(District9)andanalternativesiteinthe
SouthwesternNeighborhoodDistrict(District10).InSeptember2012,theCVESDprovidedformal
confirmationthatthealternativesiteinDistrict10wasnolongerneeded;therefore,inMarch2013a
SPAplanamendmentincludedtheeliminationofthealternativeschoolsite(Resolution2013-038and
ordinance 3257).
Sincethen,theSchoolDistrictandtheApplicanthavediscussedaconceptforapotentialjoint-use
elementaryschoolandYMCAfacility.TheApplicantandtheCVESDconcludedthatoneofthe
challengestolocatingapotentialjoint-usefacilitywasthesizeoftheschoolsiteinTMLot26in
District9,whichisapproximately6.5acresofusablearea.Thediscussionsthenfocusedonan
alternativesitewhichcouldaccommodateapotentialjoint-usefacilitywiththeYMCAorasimilar
compatible use. Negotiations on the joint-use facility are ongoing and may or may not be realized.
TheApplicantisproposingtomovethesitefortheelementaryschoolfromitscurrentlocationin
District9toTMlot16(8.5acresinsize)intheMixed-UseCivic/OfficeCoreDistrict(District5)
(Please see Attachment 4, EUC SPA Plan Amendment).
PertheSPAPlan,Section02.03.001,District5isintendedtobetheheartofMilleniaandtofunction
“asthesymbolicandceremonialfocusofcommunitygovernmentandculture”.Ithasatargetdensity
of200residentialunits,900,000squarefeetofnon-residentialuses,aPublicLibrary,aFireStation,a
CPFsite,anda1.62-acrepark(seeAttachment4,SiteUtilizationPlan,pages5and6of31).The
CityhasreceivedaDesignReviewapplicationfromChesnutPropertiesforTMLot7whichformsthe
northernhalfofDistrict5.Thatapplicationproposesapproximately318,000squarefeetofClassA
officespacealongwithafour-storyparkingstructure.Discussionsareongoingregardingthesitingof
the Millenia library in one of the proposed buildings.
TheCVESDhassubmittedtheattachedletterdatedApril21,2016formallysupportingTMLot16as
thesitefortheMilleniaelementaryschoolduetoits“morecentrallocationandimproved
accessibility”(Attachment3).Theapplicantisinagreementwiththispositionandifapproved,the
proposed SPA plan would delete any reference to TM Lot 26 as a potential school site.
City of Chula VistaPage 3 of 9Printed on 8/4/2016
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 103
File#:16-0314, Item#: 8.
a.Proposed School Site Land Use
Theproposedschoolsiteisan8.5-acreparcellocatedinthesouthernportionofDistrict5andis
ofsufficientsizetoaccommodateapotentialjointusefacility.ThisDistrictalreadycontainsa
requirement for a CPF site to be developed within it.
Whilenotwithinaresidentialdistrict,theproposedschoolsiteisbothimmediatelyadjacentto
otherresidentialdistrictsandiscentrallylocatedwithinMillenia.Thissitewillhavedirectaccess
toa1.62-acreplannedparkP-2,theRegionalTrail,anextensivesidewalkandbicyclenetwork,
andisalsoincloseproximitytotheplannedCitylibrary,whichprovidesaddedlanduse
synergies.
TheparcelwithinDistrict5containsabuildingheightdesignationofMH3whichrequiresthata
minimumaverageheightofthreestoriesbemaintained.TheCVESDhasindicatedthatthe
maximumheightoftheschoolwillbetwostories.Itshouldbenoted,however,thatthe
RegulatingPlanforMinimumAverageBuildingHeights(Attachment4,ExhibitIII-49,pages24
and25of31)indicatesthatthepotentialschoolsitelocationisnotsubjecttoheightaveraging
calculations.
TheMilleniaplanprovidesarangeoflandusesforeachDistrict,andcontemplatesthattherange
ofresidentialandnon-residentiallandusesineachDistrictareflexible.TheSiteUtilizationPlan
providesLow(minimum),High(maximum)andTargetdensitieswithineachDistrict.Whilethe
targetamountistheanticipateddensityatthetimeofSPAapproval,anyvaluebetweenthelow
andhighamountsisconsistentwiththeSPAPlan.PerSection04.05.000oftheEUCFBC,
residentialandnon-residentialusesnotmeetingthetargetintensitycouldbereallocatedasan
intensity transfer to another District.
Consideredcumulatively,theTargetnon-residentialsquarefootageineachDistrictcorrespondsto
thetotal3.5millionnon-residentialsquarefeetapprovedfortheMilleniaproject.Thegap
betweentheTargetandHighdensitiesreflectthecapacityforeachDistricttoabsorbnon-
residentialsquarefootagedisplacedfromanotherDistrictviaintensitytransfer.Thenon-
residentialtransferabsorptioncapacityvariesbyDistrict,rangingfrom50,000squarefeet(District
10) to 368,000 square feet (District 4).
Ifrelocationoftheschoolsiteisapproved,thecurrentschoolsiteinDistrict9wouldreverttoits
underlyingresidentiallanduse,asdesignatedontheSiteUtilizationPlan.Noadditional
residentialunitsarebeingproposedatthistimeandthereissufficientcapacitytoabsorbthe
displacednon-residentialusesinotherDistricts.PriortobuildoutofDistrict5,anadministrative
intensitytransferoftheseunitstoanotherDistrictmustbeconductedinaccordancewiththe
provisions contained in Section 04.05.000 of the FBC.
WhilefinallandusesarenotknownforTMlot16inDistrict5,iftheSchoolDistrictdoesmove
forwardwithconstructionoftheMilleniaschool,itwoulddisplaceothernon-residentialuses
plannedforthatDistrict.Nointensitytransferhasbeenproposedatthistime;however,thereis
sufficientcapacityintheotherDistrictstoabsorbthenon-residentialusesthatwillbedisplaced
City of Chula VistaPage 4 of 9Printed on 8/4/2016
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 104
File#:16-0314, Item#: 8.
from District 5.
Toevaluatethepotentialfiscalimpactsassociatedwithapuredisplacementscenario(nointensity
transfertoanotherDistrict),theApplicantpreparedafiscalstudytoanalyzethepossiblelossof
450,000squarefeetofofficeusesintheCivicDistrict.ThatstudycomparestheCity’scosts
associatedwiththeofficeusewithanticipatedrevenuestogenerateanetfiscalimpacttotheCity.
Please refer to the Ongoing Fiscal Section of this report for an analysis of the fiscal impacts.
b.Proposed School Site Circulation
Theproposedschoolsitewillbeboundonthreesidesbyroads,includingthefour-laneMillenia
Avenue(StreetA)tothewest,MontageAvenuetotheeastandStrataStreettothesouth.The
siteisborderedonthenorthbythefutureCivicPark(P-2)andtheplannedCityLibrarysiteonLot
7.Whilenositeplanhasbeenprovidedtoindicatethelayoutoftheschoolsite,withstreetsat
padlevelonthreesides,thereisthepotentialtoprovideforaccessandcirculationpatternsinand
aroundtheelementaryschool.Signalizedaccesstotheschoolsitewillbeprovidedviaaplanned
traffic signal on Millenia Avenue between Optima Street and Strata Street.
TheCity’sTransportationEngineerhasreviewedtheprevioustrafficstudiespreparedfortheEUC
andconcludedthattrafficimpactsofprovidingaschoolsiteinDistrict5wouldbeminimaltonone.
Whiletheremaybetemporaryheavytrafficduringmorningandafternoonpeakhours,therewill
beenoughcapacityontheroadwaysandintersectionstohandlethesetemporarypeaks.Further,
becausetheMilleniacommunityislaidoutinagridpatternofsmallerunclassifiedstreetsthat
provideanumberofwaystogettoanydestinationwithinthesite,theCity’sTransportation
EngineerhasindicatedthatMilleniaAvenuewillnotcreateasubstandardlevelofserviceasa
result of the alternative school site location.
Street Deletion Authority
Section04.06.000oftheMilleniaFBCincludesspecificSubdivisionStandardsandProceduresthat
allownewstreetstobeaddedbyFinalMapwiththeapprovalofthe“DirectorofPlanningand
Building(nowDirectorofDevelopmentServices)andtheCityEngineer”,regardlessofwhetherthose
streetswereshownontheoriginalTentativeMap.Theintentoftheproposedamendmentistoadd
clarifyinglanguagetoallowstreetstoalsobedeletedwithapprovalofaFinalMapwiththeDirector
ofDevelopmentServicesandtheCityEngineer’sapproval(Attachment4,page31of31).Any
requestwouldneedtobesupportedbyatechnicalstudyevaluatingtheimpactofthedeletiononthe
Millenia circulation system, surrounding arterials and adjacent properties.
a.Montage Avenue Segment Deletion
Inadditiontotheproposedamendmentdiscussedabove,theApplicantisproposingtodelete
MontageAvenuebetweenStrataStreetandAvantStreet.In2014,theCityCouncilapprovedthe
SPAPlanandrelatedentitlementsfortheOtayLandCompany’sVillageNineproject.Those
entitlementseliminatedthesoutherlyextensionofMontageAvenuefromthefutureHunte
Parkway/MainStreetextensionacrosstheOtayLandCompanyproperty.Thisactionhadthe
impactofrenderingthissegmentofMontageAvenueontheMilleniasiteunnecessary.Atechnical
studydatedAugust13,2013waspreparedbyDarnellandAssociatesandshowedthatthe
City of Chula VistaPage 5 of 9Printed on 8/4/2016
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 105
File#:16-0314, Item#: 8.
deletionofthestreetsegmentwouldnotadverselyimpacteitherthecirculationorlevelsofservice
(LOS) in the project. That study was reviewed and approved by City Staff.
ThedeletionofthesegmentofMontageAvenuesouthofStrataStreet,whichwouldbedeletedby
theDirectorofDevelopmentServicesiftheproposedamendmentisapproved,willnotimpact
pedestrianorotheralternativemodesofcirculationassufficientsidewalksandbikeaccessibilityis
providedtothelotsadjacenttothedeletedstreetsegmentsviaMilleniaAvenue,OrionAvenue
andStrataStreet.Theremovalofthissegmentwillalsonotimpactanyplannedtransitroutesor
facilities.
Parking Management Plan
TheParkingStandardsSection03.15.003oftheEUCFBCrequiresthatprojectswithinMillenia
complywiththeparkingratesoutlinedinTableIII-Aofsaidsectionuntilsuchtimeastherevised
parkingratesareadoptedaspartofaParkingManagementPlan(PMP).TheFBCdidnotspecifyan
approvalauthorityfortheadoptionofthePMP.TheproposedSPAamendmentintendstoclarifythe
approvalauthorityforthePMP,aswellas,toadoptrevisedparkingratesfromtheproposedPMP
whichwillreplacethosecurrentlyshowninTableIII-AoftheEUCFBC(Attachment4,pages27,28,
and 29 of 31).
ThePMP,preparedbyLinscott,Law&Greenspan(LLG),iscurrentlyunderCityreviewandisnow
nearingcompletion.ThePMP’spurposeistoprovideamechanismtomanagetheparkingallocation
forMilleniaandtoimplementtheprovisionsoftheSPAPlanwithanoverallgoalofmanagingthe
parkingdemandandsupplywithinthenon-residentialareasoftheproject.ThePMPwouldnotapply
toresidentialparkingwithinprivatelots;however,itdoesapplytoresidentialparkingonpublic
streets.Themanagementoftheresidentiallots,andanyspecificresidentialpermitparkingprogram
implementedwithinthoseprivatelots,wouldbeunderthesolepurviewofeachindividual
Homeowner’sAssociation(HOA).Sharedparkingwillnotbearequirementforanyresidential
development,althoughtheoptiontoenterintoaprivateagreementtoshareparkingisopenviaa
private agreement between the sharing parties.
a.Parking District
PerSection03.15.010oftheEUCFBC,aParkingDistrictshallbeformedandamanagement
entityestablishedinordertoactivelyimplementandupdateaparkingmanagementplan.The
DeclarationofCovenants,ConditionsandRestrictionsandEstablishmentofEasementsof
Millenia(CommunityDeclaration)recordedDecember18,2013asdocumentnumber2013-
0727255statesthattheCommunityAssociationwillformaParkingDistrictCouncil(PDC)to
implementtheParkingManagementPlanwhichshallbepreparedbytheMasterDeveloperand
shallbeupdatedonasemi-annualbasisinaccordancewiththerequirementsofCommunity
EntitlementsandtheprovisionsofArticle4oftheCommunityDeclaration.ThePDCmayalso
include representatives of the City.
ThePMPwillbeimplementedbyeithertheMasterDeveloper,duringtheinitialbuild-outofthe
projectinaccordancewiththeCommunityDeclaration,orthePDC.Dutiesincludethe
requirementtoconductaninventoryandoccupancystudyeverytwoyearstodeterminethe
numberofavailablespacesintheParkingDistrictduringpeakperiodsandtoevaluatetheir
City of Chula VistaPage 6 of 9Printed on 8/4/2016
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 106
File#:16-0314, Item#: 8.
sharedparkingeffectiveness.ThestudyshallbeusedtoupdatethePMP,includingthe
developmentofnewparkingratesforprojectswithintheDistrict.Thenewrateswouldapplytoall
development projects in the district during the following two-year period.
b.Parking Rates
TherevisedparkingratesinthePMPdifferfromthosedescribedinTableIII-AoftheSPAinthat
theyrepresentmoreappropriateratiosforthecurrentmarketconditionsasprimarilyreflectedin
ndth
thebaseratesfoundinthe ULIÓsSharedParking(2Edition)and ITEÓsParkingGeneration(4
Edition).TherevisedparkingrateswillbeincorporatedasAppendixBintheParking
ManagementPlan.Theserateswillbeuseduntilafutureparkingsurveyisconductedand
updatedparkingratesadoptedeverytwoyears.Forprojectsrequestingparkinglowerthanthe
amountrequiredbythePMPorparkinggreaterthantheamountrequiredbythePMPbymore
than 10%, a parking study is required as part of their Design Review application.
TheproposedamendmentwouldgivetheDirectorofDevelopmentServicesauthoritytoapprovethe
initialParkingManagementPlanandfuturechangestothePlan.Theamendmentwouldalsoallow
futurerevisionstonon-residentialparkingratesbasedonresultsoftherequiredperiodicparking
surveys.DuringthepublichearingheldonJuly13,2016,thePlanningCommissionrecommended
thatallfurtherrevisionstoparkingratesshallrequirepriorreviewandapprovalbyPlanning
CommissionpriortoreplacingthosecontainedintheParkingManagementPlanandasshownin
TableIII-AoftheEUCSPAPlan,untilsuchtimeastheParkingDistrictCounciltransfersfromthe
Master Developer to the Community Association. Staff agrees with this recommendation.
DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT
StaffhasreviewedthepropertyholdingsoftheCityCouncilmembersandhasfoundnoproperty
holdingswithin500feetoftheboundariesofthepropertywhichisthesubjectofthisaction.
Consequently,thisitemdoesnotpresentadisqualifyingrealproperty-relatedfinancialconflictof
interestunderCaliforniaCodeofRegulationsTitle2,section18702.2(a)(11),forpurposesofthe
Political Reform Act (Cal. Gov’t Code §87100,et seq.).
Staffisnotindependentlyaware,andhasnotbeeninformedbyanyCityCouncilmember,ofany
other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter.
LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS
TheCity’sStrategicPlanhasfivemajorgoals:OperationalExcellence,EconomicVitality,Healthy
Community, Strong and Secure Neighborhoods and a Connected Community.
TheintentofthisamendmentistoprovidesupportfortheMilleniaprojectasitdevelopsintoa
thrivingandsafedestinationwithstrongconnectionstothesurroundingcommunitieswhileproviding
activeandpassiverecreationforresidentsthusenablingahealthy,strongandsecurecommunityto
develop.
CURRENT YEAR FISCAL IMPACT
AllapplicationfeesandprocessingcostsarebornebytheApplicant,resultinginnonetimpacttothe
City of Chula VistaPage 7 of 9Printed on 8/4/2016
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 107
File#:16-0314, Item#: 8.
General Fund or the Development Services Fund.
ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT
TheMilleniaFiscalImpactAnalysis,whichisincludedasAttachment5,indicatesthattheanalysisis
basedonapreviousdevelopmentprogramevaluatedinconnectionwithafiscalanalysisfortheEUC
SPAPlanwhichenvisionedthedeliveryofthe450,000grosssquarefeetofofficespaceneartheend
oftheproject’s20-yearabsorptionperiod.TheAnalysisfurtherindicatesthatfiscalimpacts
referencedintheAnalysisatanillustrativeyear5andyear10wouldberealizedbytheCity
approximately20yearsinthefuture.TheAnalysisconcludesthatforamid-rentscenario($2.70per
squarefeet)thenetnegativefiscalimpacttotheCityofremoving450,000squarefeetofofficefrom
theCivic/OfficeDistrictwouldaverage$29,000(2015dollars)onanannualbasis.Thelossofoffice
spacewouldalsoresultinalossofapproximately1,900jobsatbuildoutoftheproject.Thisanalysis
assumesthatthereisnotransferofthiscapacitytootherDistrictswithintheproject(worst-case
scenario).
Thestudyestimatesthatatprojectbuildout,theremovaloftheofficecomponentunderconsideration
wouldresultinthelossoflessthanonepercent(0.5)ofthetotalnetCityrevenuesgeneratedbythe
Milleniaproject.Onagrossrevenuebasis,thisrepresentsanannuallossofapproximately$732,000
inyear10ofthebuildoutscenario.Thelostrevenuesarelargelyoffsetbyannualexpenditure
savingsprojectedtototal$703,000,resultingintheabovedescribednetannualfiscalimpactof
$29,000.Theestimatedfiscalimpactdoesnotincludeanyoffsetassociatedwiththeresidentialthat
willbeconstructedinthepreviouslydesignatedschoolsite,asnoincreaseofthetotalresidential
units for the project is proposed.
Thenetnegativefiscalimpactassociatedwiththisactionreducestherevenuesavailabletofinance
Cityservices.Furthermore,theCitywillabsorbtheestimatedgrossrevenuelossinperpetuityunless
anequivalentlanduseisrestoredwithintheMilleniaprojectthatcompensatesfortheremovalof
450,000squarefeetofofficespaceasproposed.Thecurrentactionneitherrequiresnorprecludes
thetransferoftheplanned450,000squarefeetofofficespaceelsewhereintheMilleniaproject.
PriortobuildoutofDistrict5,anadministrativeintensitytransfertoanotherDistrictmustbe
conductedinaccordancewiththeprovisionscontainedinSection04.05.000oftheFBC.Thereis
sufficientcapacityintheotherDistrictstoaccommodatetherequiredtransfer,andshouldsucha
transferoccurinthefuture,itwouldpotentiallyoffsetthenegativefiscalimpactassociatedwiththis
action.
WhileotherMilleniaDistrictshavesufficientcapacitytoabsorbthetransferof450,000squarefeetof
non-residentialfromDistrict5,thepracticalityofsaidabsorptionshouldbeconsidered.Projects
approvedtodate,orinprocessforapproval,areconsistentlyfailingtomeetthenon-residential
squarefootagetargets.Whilethesereduceddensitiesareallowedundertheplan,theymay
negatively impact the fiscal performance of the project.
PursuanttoSection4.5(OperatingDeficit)oftheMilleniaDevelopmentAgreement,theMaster
DeveloperwillcovertheCity’snetoperatingdeficitduringtheinitialyearsoftheproject(excluding
fireservices),uptoacumulativemaximumof$500,000.Theamountofthedeficitistobe
determinedviaafiscalstudytobepreparedbytheCityattheMasterDeveloper’scost.Perthe
DevelopmentAgreement,thefirstfiscalanalysis“shallbeconductedfollowingtheendofthefiscal
yearwhichistwo(2)yearsfollowingthefirstoccupancywithintheProperty,andannuallythereafter
City of Chula VistaPage 8 of 9Printed on 8/4/2016
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 108
File#:16-0314, Item#: 8.
attheendofeachfiscalyear.”ThefirstMilleniacertificateofoccupancywasissuedtoFairfield
Residential,onOctober23,2015.Baseduponthisdate,thefirstfiscalanalysisshallbeconducted
after June 30, 2018.
Whentheoperatingdeficitfiscalanalysisisconducted,theMasterDeveloperwillberequiredto
provideaplandemonstratingtheproject’sabilitytomeetthetotaltargetnon-residentialsquare
footage, including intensity transfers between Districts.
ATTACHMENTS
1.Locator Map
2.Addendum to Second Tier Final Environmental Impact Report EIR 07-01 (IS-15-0003)
3.Letter from the Chula Vista Elementary School District Dated April 21, 2016
nd
4.EUC SPA Plan 2 Amendment
5.Fiscal Impact Study Dated May 27, 2016
6.Planning Commission SPA Resolution MPA15-0009
7.Draft City Council SPA Plan Resolution
8.Draft City Council Ordinance
Staff Contact: Patricia Ferman, Project Manager
City of Chula VistaPage 9 of 9Printed on 8/4/2016
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 109
Attachment 1
Otay Ranch
Town
Center
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
RTISAN ST
A
.
.
COMPLEX
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
MILLENIA
DISTRICT 5
LOCATOR
DISTRICT 9
MPA15-0009
NORTH
CHULA VISTA DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
LOCATOR
Eastern Urban Center (EUC) SPA Plan & Form Base Code
Second ammendment
NORTH
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 110
L:\\Gabe Files\\Projects by Requestor\\PF\\EUC_SPA Plan & PC Regs.ai.6.17.16
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 111
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 112
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 113
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 114
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 115
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 116
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 117
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 118
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 119
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 120
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 121
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 122
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 123
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 124
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 125
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 126
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 127
July 2016
Page 2 of 31
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 128
July 2016
Page 3 of 31
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 129
July 2016
Page 4 of 31
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 130
July 2016
Page 5 of 31
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 131
July 2016
Page 6 of 31
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 132
July 2016
Page 7 of 31
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 133
July 2016
Page 8 of 31
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 134
July 2016
Page 9 of 31
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 135
July 2016
Page 10 of 31
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 136
July 2016
Page 11 of 31
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 137
July 2016
Page 12 of 31
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 138
July 2016
Page 13 of 31
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 139
July 2016
Page 14 of 31
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 140
July 2016
Page 15 of 31
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 141
July 2016
Page 16 of 31
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 142
July 2016
Page 17 of 31
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 143
July 2016
Page 18 of 31
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 144
July 2016
Page 19 of 31
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 145
July 2016
Page 20 of 31
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 146
July 2016
Page 21 of 31
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 147
July 2016
Page 22 of 31
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 148
July 2016
Page 23 of 31
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 149
July 2016
Page 24 of 31
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 150
July 2016
Page 25 of 31
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 151
July 2016
Page 26 of 31
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 152
July 2016
Page 27 of 31
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 153
July 2016
Page 28 of 31
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 154
July 2016
Page 29 of 31
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 155
July 2016
Page 30 of 31
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 156
July 2016
Page 31 of 31
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 157
memo
To:Todd Galarneau, Meridian Development
From:Lance Harris
Date:May 27, 2016
re:Millenia Fiscal Impact Analysis - Potential Removal of 450,000 Square Feet of Oce
Development
cc:
Introduction
The following provides a discussion of the potential Ðscal impact associated with the removal of 450,000
square feet of ofÐce development in the Millenia project to the City of Chula VistaÈs General Fund. It is
important to note that this analysis is based on a previous development program that was evaluated in
connection with a Ðscal analysis for the Eastern Urban Center SpeciÐc Plan Area. The development plan
envisioned the delivery of this 450,000 gross square feet of ofÐce space near the end of the projectÈs 20-year
absorption period (6,500 square feet in year 16 and the remaining 443,500 square feet in year 21).
As a
result, references herein to Ðscal impacts at an illustrative Year 5 and Year 10 would be realized by the City
.
approximately 20 years in the future
The analysis uses the the CityÈs approved Fiscal Impact Analysis (FIA) Framework as described in the
memorandum ÅChula Vista Fiscal Model Update à Overview and UserÈs Guide,Æ dated January 2015. A copy
of the model used to perform this analysis is available upon request.
Findings
The annual impact of the potential removal of the planned ofÐce development represents a loss of revenues
to the CityÈs General Fund, on average, of approximately $29,200 per year over a ten year evaluation
period as well as the loss of approximately 1,900 jobs at project build out. All values are presented in
constant 2015 dollars.
The following table and Appendix presents the Ðndings based on the mid-rent
.
scenario described in detail below
Net Fiscal Impact - Potential Removal of 450,000 Square Feet of Oce Development ($2015)
10 Year Analysis10 Year Analysis
Year 5Year 10
Year 5Year 10
CumulativeAverage
Revenues$715,418$744,423$6,590,694$732,299
Expenditures$703,099$703,099$6,327,889$703,099
Net Fiscal Impact$12,319$41,324$262,805$29,201
Note: Totals may not add; References herein to Ðscal impacts at an illustrative Year 5 and Year 10 would be realized by the City approximately 20 years in the future.
Source: City of Chula Vista and Pro Forma Advisors
Sensitivity Analysis
While the baseline estimates are tied to contemporary market assumptions, Pro Forma Advisors provided
additional analysis to demonstrate the range of impacts due to achievable ofÐce rents to provide a range of
Ðscal impacts for the City. The following rent scenarios have been used:
Low-Rent Scenario: Average $2.50 per square foot.
Mid-Rent Scenario: Average $2.70 per square foot.
High-Rent Scenario: Average $2.85 per square foot.
Pro Forma Advisors LLC Los Angeles T 310.616.5079 Hartford T 203.604.9007 F 888.696.9716 www.ProFormaAdvisors.com
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 158
memo
Rent Sensitivity Analysis - Potential Removal of 450,000 Square Feet of Oce Development
($2015)
Low-Rent Mid-Rent High-Rent
ScenarioScenarioScenario
(Year 10)(Year 10)(Year 10)
Revenues$713,508$744,423$767,610
Expenditures$703,099$703,099$703,099
Net Fiscal Impact$10,409$41,324$64,511
Note: Note: Totals may not add; References herein to Ðscal impacts at an illustrative Year 10 would be realized by the City approximately 20 years in the future
Source: City of Chula Vista and Pro Forma Advisors
Based on this analysis the potential removal of 450,000 square feet of ofÐce space would result in the loss of
$10,400 to $64,500 in net Ðscal revenue to the City on an annual basis.
Key Assumptions
SpeciÐc assumptions include the following building program, employment, value, and equivalent dwelling unit
(EDU) calculation.
It should be noted that although the ofÐce developmentÈs net leasable square feet has not been adjusted,
adjustments have been made to be consistent with the new FIA Framework that defaults to a 90 percent
occupancy and one employee for every 300 square feet of leased ofÐce space. This change from 93
percent occupancy in the previous analysis to 90 percent is made to be conservative, while the change from
one employee for every 300 square feet to 200 square feet in this analysis reÑects a contemporary
1
employment density factor for higher intensity Class A ofÐce development.
2
The model has applied the full Public Work department expense to the pro rata share of lane miles
associated with the ofÐce development. While it is assumed that the community facilities district (CFD14M)
will contribute to various aspects of infrastructure and street frontage maintenance, these Ðnancial
contributions will not offset any of the CityÈs Public Work costs associated with street maintenance in the
General Fund. It should be noted that this is very likely a conservative assumption as in addition to CFD14M,
the Millenia Master Community Association is obligated to maintain a number of elements within the street
rights of way pursuant to recorded Grants of Easement, License and Maintenance agreements (ÅGELMAsÆ)
with the City.
Pro Forma Advisors used a methodology to estimate the current tax value of the 5.1-acres of undeveloped
land based on a pro rata share of the projectÈs 2015-2016 total assessed value. An adjustment of the
undeveloped ofÐce landÈs assessed value was made to 2011 dollars. Proposition 13 limits propertiesÈ annual
value to increase at the inÑation rate, which is measured by the lesser of the California CPI or 2 percent. The
1
This reÑects the new base employment density in the revised Fiscal Impact Framework
2
Per lane mile
2 -
-
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 159
memo
California CPI was used because between 2011 and 2015 the annual increase averaged less than 2 percent
a year (1.6 percent).
All other model assumptions are consistent with the CityÈs approved FIA Framework.
Oce Development Assumptions
Gross Square Feet450,000
Building EfÐciency94%
Leasable Square Feet423,000
Occupancy90%
Occupied SF380,700
Employees per Occupied SF200
Employees 1,904
Rent per SF (NNN)$2.50 to $2.85
Capitalization Rate6.0%
New Lane Miles0.20
Undeveloped Land Assessed Value ($2015)$1,873,000
Note: Original analysis used a employee per occupied ofÐce square feet of 300 and an occupancy rate of 93 percent.
Source: City of Chula Vista and Pro Forma Advisors
Oce Development EDU Calculation
Household Population 0
Occupied Dwelling Units0
Persons Per Occupied Dwelling Unit (ODU)3.2
Employees (Non Resident)1,315
Employment Resident Equivalent 35%
Employment Resident Equivalents 460
Employment Resident Equivalents/ Persons Per ODU142
Induced ODU from Employment (New Residents Households)454
Equivalent Dwelling Units596
Source: City of Chula Vista and Pro Forma Advisors
3 -
-
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 160
memo
Other Considerations
It is useful to quantify the relative impact of the potential removal of 450,000 square feet of ofÐce space
within the Millenia project. Using the City approved Eastern Urban Center Fiscal Analysis, dated March 31,
2009, the potential removal of the ofÐce space would yield a potential loss of $25,600 in net revenue per year
(in 2008 dollars). This suggests that at project buildout the ofÐce component under consideration would
represent less than one percent (0.5) of the total net City revenues generated by the Millenia project.
4 -
-
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 161
appendix
Summary of FIA - Potential Removal of 450,000 Square Feet of Oce
Development
The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank
3 -
-
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 162
appendix
Summary of FIA - Potential Removal of 450,000 Square Feet of Oce
Development
The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank
3 -
-
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 163
appendix
Summary of FIA - Potential Removal of 450,000 Square Feet of Oce
Development
The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank
3 -
-
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 164
165
0 ¦¤
PFAID: 10-808
11,11710,02745,42468,8835,04871,556- $ 28,41561,762219,3796,7086141146,808162,909- $ 698,764
Year 10
$ $
$
$ $
$
$ $ $ $ $ $
$
$ $
- -
11,11710,02745,42468,88328,41561,762216,452160,736693,664
5,04871,5566,7086141146,808
$
$
$ $
Year 9
$ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $
--
213,430158,491688,397
11,11710,02745,42468,8835,04871,55628,41561,7626,7086141146,808
$
$
$ $
Year 8
$ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $
- -
11,11710,02745,42468,8835,04871,55628,41561,762210,3086,7086141146,808156,173682,957
$
$
$ $
Year 7
$ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $
- -
11,11710,02745,42468,88371,55628,41561,762207,0846,7086141146,808153,779677,339
5,048
$
$
$ $
Year 6
$ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $
- -
11,11710,02745,42468,88371,55628,41561,762203,754151,307671,537
5,0486,7086141146,808
$
$
$ $
Year 5
$ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $
- -
200,316148,753665,545
11,11710,02745,42468,8835,04871,55628,41561,7626,7086141146,808
$
$
$ $
Year 4
$ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $
--
196,765146,116659,357
11,11710,02745,42468,8835,04871,55628,41561,7626,7086141146,808
$
$
$ $
Year 3
Note: References herein to fiscal impacts at an illustrative Year 10 would be realized by the City approximately 20 years in the future.
$ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $
Appendix - Page 1
Summary of FIA
- -
11,11710,02745,42468,883100,97071,55628,41561,762193,0986,7086141146,808143,394748,889
$
$
$ $
Year 2
$ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $ $
-----------------
$ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $
Year 1
$3.25 Per HH Population
$23.86 Per Employee
$115.48 Per EDU$103.54 Per EDU
$18.64 Per EDU$16.81 Per EDU$47.64 Per EDU$11.25 Per EDU$11.41 Per EDU
Base Year$1.03 Per EDU$0.19 Per EDU
Rate
EDU (65% Percent Variable)
Zero Forecast - Expenditures
Household Population
Special ModelSpecial ModelSpecial ModelSpecial ModelSpecial Model
Zero ForecastZero Forecast
Allocation
Employee
EDUEDUEDUEDUEDUEDUEDUEDU
Source: City of Chula Vista; Pro Forma Advisors
Revenue Estimate (2011 Dollars)
Table 1 - Revenue Summary
Current Taxes Unsecured
Revenue from Other Agencies
Real Property Transfer Tax
Current Taxes Secured
Transient Occupancy Tax
Fines, Forfeitures, Penalties
State Secured Unitary
Development Impact Fees Pro Forma Advisors, LLC
Use of Money & Property
Business License Tax
Delinquent Taxes
Licenses and Permits
Charges for Services
Packet
Prop Tax in Lieu
NA = Not Applicable
Account Category
Other Local Taxes
Franchise Fees
!¦¤£
Other Revenue
Property Taxes
Utility Taxes
Sales TaxSales Tax
Transfers In
MLFV
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ
Total
166
0 ¦¤
PFAID: 10-808
Year 10$8,819$0$15,028$3,343$5,703$0$0$22,648$186,319$9,259$9,813$15,876$0$0$0$16,764$352,848$3,301$10,252$659,974
$0$15,028$0$0$22,648$186,319$15,876$0$0$0$16,764$352,848$10,252$659,974
$8,819$3,343$5,703$9,259$9,813$3,301
Year 9
$0$15,028$0$0$22,648$186,319$15,876$0$0$0$16,764$352,848$10,252$659,974
$8,819$3,343$5,703$9,259$9,813$3,301
Year 8
$15,028$22,648$186,319$15,876$16,764$352,848$10,252$659,974
$8,819$0$3,343$5,703$0$0$9,259$9,813$0$0$0$3,301
Year 7
$0$15,028$0$0$22,648$186,319$15,876$0$0$0$16,764$352,848$10,252$659,974
$8,819$3,343$5,703$9,259$9,813$3,301
Year 6
$0$15,028$0$0$22,648$186,319$15,876$0$0$0$16,764$352,848$10,252$659,974
$8,819$3,343$5,703$9,259$9,813$3,301
Year 5
$0$15,028$0$0$22,648$186,319$15,876$0$0$0$16,764$352,848$10,252$659,974
$8,819$3,343$5,703$9,259$9,813$3,301
Year 4
$15,028$22,648$186,319$15,876$16,764$352,848$10,252$659,974
$8,819$0$3,343$5,703$0$0$9,259$9,813$0$0$0$3,301
Note: References herein to fiscal impacts at an illustrative Year 10 would be realized by the City approximately 20 years in the future.
Year 3
$0$15,028$0$0$22,648$186,319$15,876$0$0$0$16,764$352,848$10,252$659,974
$8,819$3,343$5,703$9,259$9,813$3,301
Appendix - Page 2
Year 2
Summary of FIA
$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0
Year 1
$16,158.81 Per Lane Mile
$11.48 Per HH Pop
$14.78 Per EDU$25.19 Per EDU$37.97 Per EDU$15.52 Per EDU$16.45 Per EDU$26.61 Per EDU$28.10 Per EDU$17.19 Per EDU
Base Year$0.00 Per EDU$5.60 Per EDU$9.56 Per EDU$0.00 Per EDU$0.00 Per EDU$0.00 Per EDU$0.00 Per EDU
Rate
Special Model Special Model
HH Population
Allocation
Lane Mile
EDUEDUEDUEDUEDUEDUEDUEDUEDUEDUEDUEDUEDUEDUEDU
Source: City of Chula Vista; Pro Forma Advisors
Expenditures Estimate (2011 Dollars)
Table 2 - Expenditures Summary
Information Technology Srvcs
Planning & Building Services
Pro Forma Advisors, LLC
Boards and Commissions
Community Development
Packet
Non-Departmental
Human Resources
General Services
!¦¤£
Nature Center
Administration
Public Works
City Attorney
City Council
Department
Engineering
Recreation
City Clerk
Finance
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ
Library
Police
Total
Fire
167
0 ¦¤
PFAID: 10-808
744,423703,09941,324
Year 10
$
$ $
738,991703,099
35,892
Year 9
$
$ $
733,380703,099
30,281
Year 8
$
$ $
727,584703,099
24,485
Year 7
$
$ $
721,599703,099
18,500
Note: References herein to fiscal impacts at an illustrative Year 10 would be realized by the City approximately 20 years in the future.
Year 6
$
$ $
715,418703,099
12,319
Year 5
$
$ $
709,034703,0995,935
Appendix - Page 3
Year 4
$
Summary of FIA
$ $
(657)
702,442703,099
Year 3
$
$ $
797,824703,09994,725
Year 2
$
$ $
---
$ $ $
Year 1
Source: City of Chula Vista; BLS; Pro Forma Advisors
General Fund (Adjusted to 2015 Year Dollars)
Table 3 - Net Fiscal Impact
Net Fiscal Impact Estimate
Pro Forma Advisors, LLC
Packet
!¦¤£
Expenditures
Revenues
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ
RESOLUTION NO. MPA15-0009
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA PLANNING
COMMISSION RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL
CONSIDER THE ADDENDUM (IS-15-0003)TO EIR 07-01AND
APPROVEAMENDMENTS TO THE EASTERN URBAN CENTER
SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA (SPA) PLAN AND ASSOCIATED
REGULATORY DOCUMENTS RELATING TO THEMILLENIA
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SITE, THE PARKING MANAGEMENT
PLAN AND MILLENIA STREETREMOVAL.
WHEREAS
, a duly verified application was filed with the City of Chula Vista
DevelopmentServices Department on June29, 2015 by SLF IV-Millenia, LLC (the
“Applicant,” “Owner” and “Developer” requesting approval of an EUC Sectional
Planning Area (SPA)Plan and Form Based Code (FBC) amendment to relocate the
Milleniaelementary school site intothemixed use Civic/OfficeCore District 5 in
response to the Chula Vista Elementary School District’s (School District) request to
select thissite as their preferred school site in the Millenia project; and to give the
Director of Development Services the authority to approve the Millenia Parking
Management Plan and to remove Millenia streets;and
WHEREAS
, the Director of Development Services has reviewed the proposed
projectfor compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has
determined that the project was covered in previously adopted Final Second Tier
Environmental Impact Report, EIR 07-01. The Director of Development Services has
determined that only minor technical changes or additions to this document are necessary
and that none of the conditions described in Section 15162 and 15164 of the State CEQA
Guidelines calling for the preparation of a subsequent document have occurred; therefore,
the Director of Development Services has prepared an addendum to the Final Second
Tier Environmental Impact Report, EIR 07-01; and
WHEREAS
, the Planning Commission finds that the Addendum (IS-15-0003)to
EIR#07-01 has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of CEQA, and the
Environmental Review Procedures of the City of Chula Vista; and
WHEREAS
, theDirector of Development Services set the time and place for a
hearing on the Project, and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by
its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City and its mailing to
property owners within 500 feet of the exterior boundaries of the property, at least 10
days prior to the hearing; and
WHEREAS
, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertisedin the
CouncilChambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the Planning Commission and the hearing
was thereafter closed.
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 168
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THATTHE PLANNING
COMMISSION
recommends that the City Council adopt the attached Draft City
CouncilResolution and Ordinance approving the Project in accordance with the findings
and subject to the conditions contained therein.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THECITY OF CHULA VISTA THAT
a copy of this Resolution and the draft City
Council Resolution and Ordinance be transmitted to the City Council.
PASSED AND APPROVED BYTHE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
th
OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA,
CITYthis 13of July, 2016, by the following
vote, to-wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
____________________________
Yolanda Calvo, Chairperson
ATTEST:
____________________________
Pat Laughlin, Secretary
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 169
RESOLUTION __________
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA CITY
COUNCILCONSIDERING THE ADDENDUM (IS-15-0003)
TO EIR 07-01 AND APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE
EASTERN URBAN CENTER SECTIONAL PLANNING
AREA (SPA) PLAN AND ASSOCIATED REGULATORY
DOCUMENTS RELATING TO THERELOCATION OF
MILLENIA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SITEAND
DELETION OF PORTION OF MONTAGE AVENUE.
I.RECITALS
A.Project Site
WHEREAS
, the area of land that is the subject of this Resolution is diagrammatically
representedin Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated into thisResolution, and
commonly known as the Eastern Urban Center(EUC), and for the purpose of general
description herein consists of 207 acres locatedadjacent to and east of SR-125, adjacent
to and west of Eastlake Parkway, south of Birch Road and the Otay Ranch Town Center,
and north of the future extension of Main Street(Project Site); and
B.Project; Application for Discretionary Approvals
WHEREAS
, a duly verified application was filed with the City of Chula Vista
Services Department on June 29, 2015 by SLF IV-Millenia, LLC (the
Development
“Applicant,” “Owner” and “Developer” requesting approval of an EUC Sectional
Planning Area (SPA)Plan and Form Based Code (FBC) amendment torelocate the
Millenia primary school site from South Central Neighborhood District(District 9) to
Civic Center (District 5), todelete a segment of Montage Avenue and to give the Director
of Development Services authority to approve street deletions;and
C.Prior Discretionary Approvals
WHEREAS
,development of the Project Site has been the subject matter of various
titlements and agreements, including: 1) a SPA Plan including Public Facilities Financing
en
Plan, Affordable Housing Program and other regulatory documents approved by City
Council Resolution No. 2009-224 on September 15, 2009; and 2) Planned Community
District Regulations approved by City Council Ordinance No. 3142 on October 6, 2009;
and3) SPAPlanAmendmentapproved by City Council Ordinance No. 3257 and City
Council Resolution No.2013-038 inMarch 2013; and
D.Environmental Determination
WHEREAS
,the Director of Development Services has reviewed the proposed project
forcompliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 170
Resolution No. ______
Page 2
determined that the project was previously covered in adoptedSecond-Tier Final
Environmental Impact Report, EIR 07-01. TheDirector ofDevelopment Services has
determined that only minor technical changes or additions to this document are necessary
and that none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines
calling for the preparation of a subsequent document have occurred; therefore, the
Development Services Director has prepared an addendum (IS 15-0003) to EIR 07-01;
and
WHEREAS
,the City Council finds that the Addendum (IS 15-003) to EIR07-01 has
beenprepared in accordance with the requirements of CEQA, and the Environmental
Procedures of the City of Chula Vista; and
E.Planning Commission Record of Application
WHEREAS
, the Director of Development Services setthe time and place for a hearing on
the
Project, and notice of the hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication
in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, and its mailing to property owners within
500 feet of the exterior boundary of the Project Siteat least ten (10) days prior to the
hearing; and
WHEREAS
, the Planning Commission held an advertised public hearing on July 13, 2016
e Project and voted to adopt Resolution No. MPA15-0009recommending thatthe City
on th
Council amend the EUC SPA Plan; and
WHEREAS
, the proceedings and all evidence introduced before the Planning Commission
at the public hearing on the Project and the minutes and Resolution resulting therefrom, are
incorporated into the record of this proceeding;and
F. City Council Record of Application
WHEREAS
, the City Clerk set the time and place for the hearing on the Project application
and notices of said hearing, together with its purposegiven by its publication in a
newspaper of general circulation in the City, and its mailing to property owners within 500
feet of the exterior boundaries of the Project Siteat least ten (10) daysprior to the hearing;
and
WHEREAS
, the duly noticed and called public hearing on the Project was held before the
City Council in the Council Chambers in the City Hall, Chula Vista Civic Center, 276
Fourth Avenue, to receive the recommendations of the Planning Commission, and to hear
public testimony with regard to the same.
NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED
that theCity Council of the City of Chula
Vista hereby finds, determines, and resolves as follows:
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 171
Resolution No. ______
Page 3
II.CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH CEQA
The City Council finds that, in the exercise of their independent review and judgment, the
addendum to EIR07-01 in the form presented, has been prepared in accordance with
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Review
Procedures of the City of Chula Vista and adopts the Addendum to EIR-07-01.
III.SPA FINDINGS
A.THE SPA PLAN, AS AMENDED, IS IN CONFORMITY WITH THE OTAY
RANCH GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND THE CHULA VISTA
GENERAL PLAN AND ITS SEVERAL ELEMENTS.
The proposed amendments are consistent with the previously approved plans and
regulations applicable to surrounding sites and, therefore, the proposed amendments can
be planned and zoned in coordination and substantial compatibility with said
development
B.THE SPA PLAN, AS AMENDED, WILL PROMOTE THE ORDERLY
SEQUENTIALIZED DEVELOPMENT OF THE INVOLVED SECTIONAL
PLANNING AREAS.
The Eastern Urban Center SPA Plan as amended, will maintain existing provisions and
requirements to ensure the orderly, phased development of the project prior to or
current with the need for said public facilities.
C. THE SPA PLAN, AS AMENDED, WILL NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT ADJACENT
LAND USE, RESIDENTIAL ENJOYMENT, CIRCULATION, OR
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY.
The relocation of the primary school site will not have a negative impact on
circulation or land use. The new school location will be bound on three sides by grade
level streets. As a result, there is potential to provide for improved access and
circulation patterns. A signalized intersection on Millenia Avenue is also being
planned. While the new primary school site will nolonger be located in a residential
district, it will be both adjacent to other residential districts,as well as,being centrally
located overall within Millenia. The new school location is adjacent to a future park
with access to the Regional Trail and an extensive sidewalk and bicycle network.
Allowingadministrative approval of the deletion of street segments will not cause
adverse impacts in that said requests would require adequate traffic analysis to be
providedprior to approval by the Director of Development Services and the City
Engineer.
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 172
Resolution No. ______
Page 4
The extension of Montage Avenue south of Milleniaplannedto connect to Main
Street(previously known as Hunte Parkway)within the Otay Land Company property
was previously eliminated in 2014, with City Council approval of the SPA and related
entitlements to the Otay Land Company’s Village Nine project.. This action had the
impact of rendering a segment of Montage Avenue (between Strata Street and Avant
Street) on the Millenia site unnecessary. A technical study dated August 13, 2013
was prepared by Darnell and Associates, Inc. and accepted by the City showing that
the deletion of the street segment would not adversely impact either the circulation or
levels of service (LOS) in the project. In fact, the study concluded that several of the
Millenia intersections operated better with this street segment removed. That study
was reviewed and approved by the City.
The deletion of the segment of Montage Avenue south of Strata Street, which is now
being requested for deletion,will not impact pedestrian or other alternative modes of
circulation, as sufficient sidewalks and bike accessibility is provided to the lots
adjacent to the deleted street segments via Millenia Avenue, Orion Avenue and Strata
Street. The removal of this segment will also not impact any planned transit routes or
facilities
IV. APPROVAL OF SPA AMENDMENTS
Based on the findings above, the City Council approves the EUC SPA Plan as amended and
shown in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated into this Resolutionsubject to the
conditions set forth below:
th
1.Prior to the 30day after the accompanying Ordinance becomes effective, the
Applicant shall prepare a clean copy of the SPA Plan document by deleting all strike
out/underlines and shading. Where the document contains an existing and proposed
exhibit, the previous existing exhibit shall be removed and substituted. In addition,
the revised text, document format, maps and statistical changes within the EUC SPA
and Form Based Code shall be approved by the Director of Development Services for
printing prior to incorporating said revisions into the final document.
2.Prior to the 30th day after the accompanying Ordinance becomes effective, the
Applicant shall submit to the Development Services Department 10 copies and a CD
of the approved amendment to the EUC SPA Planand Planned Community (PC)
District Regulations.
3.Applicant to comply with all the conditions of approval of the Otay Ranch EUC SPA
Plan incorporated in Resolution 2009-224 and adopted SPA Plan.
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 173
Resolution No. ______
Page 5
V. CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE OF CONDITIONS
If any of the forgoing conditions fail to occur, or if they are, by their terms, to be
implemented and maintained over time, and any of such conditions fail to be so
implemented and maintained according to the their terms, the City shall have the right to
revoke or modify all approvals herein granted, deny or further condition issuance of future
building permits, deny, revoke or further condition all certificates of occupancy issued
under the authority of approvals herein granted, instituted and prosecute,litigate or compel
their compliance or seek damages for their violations. No vested rights are gained by
Applicant or any successor in interest by the City approval of this Resolution.
VI.INVALIDITY; AUTOMATIC REVOCATION
It is the intention of the City Council that its adoption of this Resolution is dependent upon
forceability of each and every term provision and condition herein stated; and that in the
en
event that any one or more terms, provisions or conditions are determined by aCourt of
competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, if the City so determines in its
sole discretion, this Resolution shall be deemed to be revoked and of no further force or
effect ab initio.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED
that the City Council hereby adopts this Resolution approving
nce with the findings and subject to the conditionscontained herein.
the Project in accorda
Presented by:Approved as to form by:
_____________________________________________
Gary Halbert, P.E., AICPGlen R. Googins
City ManagerCity Attorney
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA,
CALIFORNIA, this _____ day of ___________, by the following vote, to-wit:
AYES:Council members:
NAYS:Council members:
ABSENT:Council members:
ABSTAIN:Council members:
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 174
Resolution No. ______
Page 6
________________________
Mary Salas, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________
Donna Norris, City Clerk
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 175
Attachment 1
Otay Ranch
Town
Center
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
RTISAN ST
A
.
.
COMPLEX
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
MILLENIA
DISTRICT 5
LOCATOR
DISTRICT 9
MPA15-0009
NORTH
CHULA VISTA DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
LOCATOR
Eastern Urban Center (EUC) SPA Plan & Form Base Code
Second ammendment
NORTH
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 176
L:\\Gabe Files\\Projects by Requestor\\PF\\EUC_SPA Plan & PC Regs.ai.6.17.16
July 2016
Page 2 of 31
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 177
July 2016
Page 3 of 31
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 178
July 2016
Page 4 of 31
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 179
July 2016
Page 5 of 31
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 180
July 2016
Page 6 of 31
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 181
July 2016
Page 7 of 31
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 182
July 2016
Page 8 of 31
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 183
July 2016
Page 9 of 31
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 184
ORDINANCE NO.______________
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING
AMENDMENTS TO THE EASTERN URBAN CENTER
PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT REGULATIONS AND
DESIGN PLAN (FORM BASED CODE) FOR 207 ACRES OF
LAND IN THE EASTERN URBAN CENTER PORTION OF
THE OTAY RANCH RELATING TO THE RELOCATION OF
THE MILLENIA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SITE, DELETION
OF A PORTION OF MONTAGE AVENUE, REVISING THE
PARKING RATESAND STANDARDS AND CLARIFYING
THE APPROVAL PROCESS FOR THE PARKING
MANAGEMENT PLAN, SUBSEQUENT PARKING RATES,
AND FUTURE STREET DELETIONS
I.RECITALS
A.Project Site
WHEREAS
, the area of land that is the subject of this Ordinance is
diagrammatically represented in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated into this
Ordinance, and commonly known as the Eastern Urban Center (EUC), and for the
purpose of general description herein consists of 207 acres locatedadjacent to and
east of SR-125, adjacent to and west of Eastlake Parkway, south of Birch Road and
the Otay Ranch Town Center, and north of the future extension of Main Street
(“Project Site”); and
B.Project; Application for Discretionary Approvals
WHEREAS
, a duly verified application was filed with the City of Chula Vista
DevelopmentServices Department on June 29, 2015 by SLF IV-Millenia, LLC (the
“Applicant,” “Owner” and “Developer” requesting 1) approval of an EUC Sectional
Planning Area (SPA)Plan and Form Based Code (FBC) amendment to relocate the
primary school site from District 9 to District 5: and 2) clarifying the approval
process for the deletion of street segments and for the approval of the Parking
Management Plan within Millenia; and
C.Prior Discretionary Approvals
WHEREAS
, the SPA plan approved by the City in September of 2009 included two
potentialschool sites: A preferred six acre site in the South-Central Residential
District (District 9) and an alternative site in the Southwestern Neighborhood District
(District 10) should the primary site be rejected by the School District. In September
2012, the School District provided formal confirmation that the alternative site in
District 10 was no longer needed; therefore, in March 2013 a SPA plan amendment
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 185
Ordinance No. __________
Page 2
included the elimination of the alternative school site (Resolution 2013-038 and
ordinance 3257); and
D.Environmental Determination
WHEREAS
,The Director of Development Services has reviewed the proposed
projectfor compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and
has determined that the project was covered in previously adopted Final Second Tier
Environmental Impact Report, EIR 07-01. The Director of Development Services
has determined that only minor technical changes or additions to this document are
necessary and that none of the conditions described in Section 15162 and 15164 of
the State CEQA Guidelines calling for the preparation of a subsequent document
have occurred; therefore, the Director of Development Services has prepared an
addendum to the Final Second Tier Environmental Impact Report, EIR 07-01; and
WHEREAS
, the City Council finds that the Addendum (IS 15-0003) to EIR 07-
01 has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of CEQA, and the
Environmental Procedures of the City of Chula Vista; and
E.Planning Commission Record of Application
WHEREAS
, the Director of Development Services setthe time and place for a
hearingon the Project, and notice of the hearing, together with its purpose, was given
by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, and its mailing to
property owners within 500 feet of the exterior boundary of the Project Siteat least
ten (10) days prior to the hearing; and
WHEREAS
, the Planning Commission held an advertised public hearing onJuly 13,
2016 onthe Project to adopt Resolution MPA15-0009recommending thatthe City
Council amend the EUC SPA Plan; and
WHEREAS
, the proceedings and all evidence introduced before the Planning
Commission at the public hearing on the Project and the minutes and Resolution
resulting therefrom, are incorporated into the record of this proceeding; and
F. City CouncilRecord of Application
WHEREAS,
the City Clerk set the time and place for the hearing on the Project
application and notices of said hearing, together with its purposes given by its
publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, and its mailing to property
owners within 500 feet of the exterior boundaries of the Project Siteat least ten (10)
daysprior to the hearing; and
WHEREAS
, the duly noticed and called public hearing on the Project was held before
the City Councilinthe Council Chambers in the City Hall, Chula Vista Civic Center,
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 186
Ordinance No. __________
Page 3
276 Fourth Avenue, to receive the recommendations of the Planning Commission, and
to hear public testimony with regard to the same.
II.NOW THEREFORE
, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby find,
determine and ordain as follows:
A.CONSISTENCY WITH GENERAL PLAN
The City Council finds that the proposed amendment to the EUC Planned
Community District Regulations and Form Based Codeare consistent with the City
of Chula Vista General Plan. The General Plan contains a “floating” location for a
required elementary school within the overall 207-acre EUC. The proposed
amendment is to allow for the relocation of the primary school site from District 9 to
District 5.The deletion of a segmentofMontage Avenueis consistent with the
General Plan in that it is not considered a circulation element road. The approval
authority for future street deletions and for the Parking Management Plan is
administrative in nature and therefore isalso consistentwith the General Plan. The
adoption of parking rates will replace existing parking rates already established in the
SPA.
B.APPROVAL OF PROPOSED AMENDMENTS
The City Council hereby approves the amendments to the Eastern Urban Center
PlannedCommunity District Regulations and Design Guidelines (Form Based Code)
as represented in Exhibit Battached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
III.EFFECTIVE DATE
This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force on the thirtieth day from and after its adoption.
Presented byApproved as to form by:
_____________________________________________
Kelly BroughtonGlen R. Googins
Director ofDevelopment ServicesCity Attorney
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 187
Attachment 1
Otay Ranch
Town
Center
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
RTISAN ST
A
.
.
COMPLEX
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
MILLENIA
DISTRICT 5
LOCATOR
DISTRICT 9
MPA15-0009
NORTH
CHULA VISTA DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
LOCATOR
Eastern Urban Center (EUC) SPA Plan & Form Base Code
Second ammendment
NORTH
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 188
L:\\Gabe Files\\Projects by Requestor\\PF\\EUC_SPA Plan & PC Regs.ai.6.17.16
July 2016
Page 10 of 31
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 189
July 2016
Page 11 of 31
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 190
July 2016
Page 12 of 31
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 191
July 2016
Page 13 of 31
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 192
July 2016
Page 14 of 31
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 193
July 2016
Page 15 of 31
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 194
July 2016
Page 16 of 31
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 195
July 2016
Page 17 of 31
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 196
July 2016
Page 18 of 31
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 197
July 2016
Page 19 of 31
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 198
July 2016
Page 20 of 31
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 199
July 2016
Page 21 of 31
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 200
July 2016
Page 22 of 31
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 201
July 2016
Page 23 of 31
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 202
July 2016
Page 24 of 31
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 203
July 2016
Page 25 of 31
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 204
July 2016
Page 26 of 31
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 205
July 2016
Page 27 of 31
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 206
July 2016
Page 28 of 31
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 207
July 2016
Page 29 of 31
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 208
July 2016
Page 30 of 31
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 209
July 2016
Page 31 of 31
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 210
City of Chula Vista
Staff Report
File#:16-0354, Item#: 9.
CONSIDERATIONOFANAPPEALBYBALDWIN&SONSOFTHEPLANNINGCOMMISSION’S
ACTIONOFNODECISIONDUETONOTACHIEVINGAMAJORITYVOTEONDESIGNREVIEW
PERMITDR15-0024FORA78-UNITMULTI-FAMILYRESIDENTIALPROJECTINOTAYRANCH
VILLAGE TWO NEIGHBORHOOD R-17B(b)
RESOLUTIONOFTHECITYCOUNCILOFTHECITYOFCHULAVISTAAPPROVINGAN
APPEALFORDESIGNREVIEWPERMITDR15-0024TOCONSTRUCTA78-UNITMULTI-
FAMILYDUPLEXDEVELOPMENTWITHTWO-CARGARAGES,RECREATIONAREAS,AND
ASSOCIATEDOPENSPACEON4.7ACRESWITHINTHEOTAYRANCHVILLAGETWO,
NEIGHBORHOOD R-17B(b)
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Council conduct the public hearing and adopt the resolution.
SUMMARY
Theapplicant,Baldwin&Sons,submittedaDesignReviewapplicationrequestingapprovalofa78-
unitmulti-familyprojectona4.7acrevacantsitelocatedinOtayRanchVillageTwo,NeighborhoodR
-17B(b).OnJune22,2016,thePlanningCommissionvoted3to2withmorecommissionersinfavor
oftheprojectbutdidnotachieveamajorityvote,resultingin“NoDecision.”PerMunicipalCode
Section 19.14, Baldwin & Sons filed this appeal to the City Council on June 27, 2016.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Environmental Notice
TheProjectwasadequatelycoveredinpreviouslyadopted/certifiedFinalSupplemental
EnvironmentalImpactReport(FSEIR12-01)fortheOtayRanchVillageTwoComprehensive
Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan Amendment.
Environmental Determination
TheDirectorofDevelopmentServiceshasreviewedtheproposedprojectforcompliancewiththe
CaliforniaEnvironmentalQualityAct(CEQA)andhasdeterminedthattheprojectwasadequately
coveredinpreviouslyadopted/certifiedFinalSupplementalEnvironmentalImpactReport(FSEIR12-
01)fortheOtayRanchVillageTwoComprehensiveSectionalPlanningArea(SPA)PlanAmendment.
Thus, no further environmental review or documentation is required.
City of Chula VistaPage 1 of 6Printed on 8/4/2016
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 211
File#:16-0354, Item#: 9.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
OnJune22,2016,thePlanningCommissiontookactionandvoted3to2ontheproject.Theproject
didnotachieveamajorityvoteresultingin“NoDecision.”Therefore,theprojectrequiresthesubject
appeal to the City Council for a final decision.
DISCUSSION
Project Site Characteristics:
The4.7-acrevacantprojectsiteislocatedinthewesternportionofVillageTwowithintheVillage
SecondaryCoreDistrict,onavacantparcelsouthofSantaVictoriaRoadbetweenSantaIvyAvenue
andSantaCristinaAvenue.NeighborhoodR-17B(b)isborderedbythefuturemulti-familyresidential
sitestotheeast,south,andwest,andafutureParksiteP-2tothenorth(Attachment1,Locator
Map). All of the surrounding parcels are currently vacant.
Summary of Surrounding Land Uses:
General Plan Zoning Current Land Use
Site: Mixed-Use Residential Multi-Family, RM2 Vacant, Future Multi-Family Res.
East: Residential Medium Multi-Family, RM1 Vacant, Future Multi-Family Res.
North: Parks and Rec. Multi Family, RM2 Vacant, Future Park
South: Residential Medium Multi Family, RM1 Vacant, Future Multi-Family Res.
West: Mixed-Use Residential Multi-Family, RM2 Vacant, Future Multi-Family Res.
Project Description:
Theproposalincludestwobuildingplantypeswithtwoarchitecturalstyles(TuscanandSpanish
Eclectic).Thebuildingswillbetwo-storywithanoptionalthird-story.Theproposedheightwouldbea
maximum 28’-3” for two story units, and approximately 37 feet for a third story option.
Thefloorplans,consistingofthreeandfour-bedroomunits,aresizedatapproximately1,561square-
feetto1,587square-feetperunit.Upto(26)ofthe(39)buildingsmayincludeoptional3-storyunits
thatwillbefourtosixbedroomswithanopenloft,andupto2,476square-feetinfloorarea.Eachof
thethreefloorplanswillincludeatwo-cargarage.Eachunitwillaccommodatealivingroom,dining
room,kitchenandapowderroomonthefirstfloor,withbedroomsaboveonthesecondfloorand
optionalthirdfloor.EachunitisdesignedtoprovidethefrontentriesoffofSantaIvyAvenue,Santa
ChristinaAvenue,andKeckRoad,whilethegarageaccessislocatedoffoftheinternalprivatestreet
(s).
Allarchitecturestylesincorporateeightcolorschemeswithmaterialssuchaslighttodarkcolored
stucco,tiledroofs,wroughtironaccents,coloredenhancedshutters,decorativefoamplastergrill
vents,masonrystonepiercolumns,andarchedopenings.Requiredparkingisprovidedthroughboth
on-siteandon-streetparkingaspermittedbytheVillageTwoSectionalPlanningArea(SPA)Plan,
subject to Design Review discretion.
Onsiteamenitiesinclude:atotlot,BBQandseatingareas,andseveralopenspaceareasthroughout
theprojectsiteconsistingofapassiveopenspaceareain-betweenbuildingsandattheproject
entrances.Pedestrianlightedwalkwaysandbencheshavebeenplacedwithintheopenspaceareas
throughouttheproject.Thereareseveralvehicleandpedestrianaccessesonandoffthesite.
Vehiclescanaccessthesitethroughtwodriveways,onealongSantaIvyandonealongSanta
City of Chula VistaPage 2 of 6Printed on 8/4/2016
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 212
File#:16-0354, Item#: 9.
ChristinaAvenue.Thefrontentrancesareorientedtowardperimeterstreets,andalonginterior
paseos and walkways.
Compliance with Development Standards:
ThefollowingProjectDataTableshowstheVillageTwoSPAdevelopmentregulationsalongwiththe
applicant’s proposal to meet said requirements:
ANALYSIS:
Compliance with Otay Ranch Village 2 Design Guidelines
Site Planning and Building Placement/Orientation:
TheVillageDesignPlan,SectionIIIResidentialDistrictandtheVillageCoreMasterPrecisePlan
(MPP)includeguidelinesandpoliciesthatensurethatmulti-familyresidentialbuildingswillcontribute
City of Chula VistaPage 3 of 6Printed on 8/4/2016
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 213
File#:16-0354, Item#: 9.
tothepedestrian-oriented“VillageConcept”establishedintheOtayRanchGDP.Policiesrelatingto
pedestrianconnections,buildingorientation,enhancedelevationsandvehicularaccessarelistedin
eachdocumenttoimplementthevisions.Thepedestrianfeaturesthroughoutthesitemeettheintent
of the Village Design Plan as described below.
Passiveopenspaceareashavebeenprovidedbetweenbuildingsandatstreetintersectionswhile
threeparksarelocatedwithinwalkingdistanceofthesite;afuturepark(P1Park)sitetothe
northwest,futurepark(P2Park)tothenorthandfuturepark(P5Park)tothesouthwestforthe
residentstoenjoy.Withinthesite,two(2)paseoswithmeanderingwalkways,canopytreesand
seatingbenchesareprovidedinanorthtosouthdirectionandanotherpaseoinaneasttowest
directionprovidesinterconnectedpedestriancorridors.Severalactiveopenspaceareasare
providedonsite.AsmallpocketparklocatedattheentranceonSantaIvyRoadwithatotlot,seating
benches,canopytreesandlowhedgebarriersurroundingthetotlotprovideseasyaccessandsafety
forresidents.AnothersmallpocketparkislocatedatthemainentranceonSantaCristinaRoadand
containsabarbeque,coveredwoodtrellisoverascoredconcreteseatingareawithbenchseating
andseatwallswhichallowforvarietybetweenthetwopocketparks.Theseamenitiesareprovided
for residents and promote pedestrian activities and interaction.
InordertocomplywiththebuildingsitingpolicesandguidelinesincludedintheVillageTwoDesign
PlanandVillageCoreMPP,buildingshavebeenorientedtofrontontheperimeterpublicstreets
includingthefutureP-2Park,viasemi-coveredpatiosandporchesthatprovideforapedestrian
connection.
WhilepedestrianaccessisthemostsignificantfeatureintheVillagesofOtayRanch,increased
vehicularaccessisalsoimportantinordertoofferavarietyofwaystoaccessdifferentareas.
Dispersionofautomobiletrafficalsohastheeffectofmakingareasmorepedestrianfriendlyascars
andpedestrianshavelessdirectinteraction.NeighborhoodR-17B(b)providestwovehicularaccess
pointsthroughtwoprivatestreets,onealongSantaChristinaAvenueandonealongSantaIvy
Avenue.
Architectural Theme:
TheVillageTwoSPADesignPlan,Multi-FamilyResidentialGuidelinesSectionandVillageCore
MMPidentifySantaBarbara,CaliforniaasthedesigninspirationfortheVillageofMontecito(Village
Two).Asafundamentalcomponentofthevillagecore,thearchitectureoftheproposedmulti-family
developmentisfocusedprimarilyontheSantaBarbaradesigntheme.Althoughnotmandated,
preferredarchitecturalstylesforthecore’smulti-familydevelopmentincludeSpanishEclecticand
Spanish Mission to complement the design theme of the remainder of the village.
NeighborhoodR-17B(b)iswithintheVillageofMontecito’sSecondaryCoreDistrictandits
architectureisconsistentwiththepoliciesoftheVillageDesignPlanandtheVillageCoreMPP.The
proposedTuscanandSpanishEclecticarchitecturestylesincludeeightcolorschemeswithlightto
darkcoloredstuccowalls,tileroofs,archedopenings,decorativeironbalconyrailings,decorativetile
andwroughtironpotshelves,inadditiontoaccentcolorsforthetrimanddoor/window/garageframe
color.
ThroughoutOtayRanch,enhancedelevationsarerequiredwheredevelopmentsarevisiblefrom
publicrights-of-wayaswellaspedestrianareas.ThisregulationisstipulatedintheVillageTwo
City of Chula VistaPage 4 of 6Printed on 8/4/2016
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 214
File#:16-0354, Item#: 9.
PlannedCommunity(PC)DistrictregulationsandtheVillageCoreMPP.Typically,mullioned
windows,pop-outs,andwindowsurroundswereusedtomeetthesestandardsinpreviousvillages,
and these features have become standard in Village Two.
Enhancedelevationsshouldincludevaryingbuildingelements,roofpitches,andsetbackstoavoid
monotony.Inaddition,distinctivebuildingelementsshallbeorientedtowardthecornersofprominent
villagecoreandentrystreetintersections.Streetfacingfacadesarerequiredtoincorporatearange
ofscale-definingelementsthatrelatelargerbuildingmassestothescaleofthepedestrian.Elements
mayincludecolumns,archways,doorways,porchesorpatiosandupperfloorbalconiesand
windows.Fortheproposedproject,additionaldesignfeaturessuchasdecorativegrills,potshelves,
andshuttersatwindows,woodbracesoverwindows,decorativewoodsill,stoneveneer,decorative
tilesurroundingarchedentrywaysandbuildingoffsetswereaddedalongthefrontoftheresidential
buildings to avoid a monotonous design.
Parking:
TheVillage2SPAregulationsrequire2.25spaces(whichincludes0.33spacesperunitforguest
parking)fortheRM2LandUsedistrict.Thebaseparkingrequirementis176spacesonsiteforthe
78homesplannedforthisneighborhood.TosatisfytheSPAparkingrequirement,eachunitprovides
aside-by-sidetwocargarage(totaling156spaces)and24unassignedspacesforatotalof180on-
sitespaces.PursuanttotheOtayRanchVillage2SPA,SectionVIII.3.B,ParkingRegulations,the
Citymayallowtheuseofon-streetparkingtoaccommodateportionsofaproject’srequiredparking,
subject to Design Review discretion.
Staffrequestedtheapplicanttoprovideanadditional0.50spaceforeachbedroomforresidential
unitsgreaterthanfourbedrooms.Theadditionalparkingistoaddressconcernsforthepotential
additionalparkingdemandresultingfromproposedlargerhomesuptosixbedrooms.Theapplicant
hasagreedtoprovide2.75parkingspacesforfive-bedroomhomesand3.25spacesfor6bedroom
homes,whichresultsinatotalparkingrequirementof209spaces.Thisis33spacesabovethebase
parkingrequirementof176spaces.ThisrequirementisidentifiedinCondition#8intheattachedCity
Council Resolution, which the applicant has agreed to.
Theprojectprovides180spaceson-siteandproposestosatisfytheremainingrequired29parking
spacesbyutilizingnomorethan50%ofthe58on-streetspaceslocatedontheadjoiningstreets
includingSantaVictoriaRoad,SantaChristinaAvenue,SantaIvyAvenueandKeckStreet.The
projectmeetsrequiredparkinganddoesnotproposeanycompactparkingspaces.Staffsupports
theproposeduseofon-streetparkingforthenoted29.Thefinaldesignoftheprojectwillcontaina
unitmixthatmaynotexceedthemaximumallowanceof209parkingspacesandupto50%of
available on-street spaces.
Open Space:
TheVillage2SPAregulationsrequire200square-feetofCommonUsableOpenSpaceperunitinthe
RM2zoningdistrict.The78unitsinthisneighborhoodrequire15,600square-feetofCommonUsable
OpenSpace.Thisprojectprovides20,986squarefeet.TheVillage2SPAalsorequires100square
feetofPrivateOpenSpaceforhomeswiththreebedroomsandabove(x78)foratotalrequirementof
7,800sf.Theprojectexceedsthisrequirementwith30,395squarefeetofprivateopenspacearea,
which is almost four times the amount required.
City of Chula VistaPage 5 of 6Printed on 8/4/2016
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 215
File#:16-0354, Item#: 9.
Storage:
Eachoftheduplexresidentialunitswillprovidestoragespace.Storagespaceisrequiredfor
condominiumprojectsattherateof250cubicfeetforeach3bedroomunit.Theprojectprovidesa
minimumof267cuft.foreach3bedroomunit,andupto502cu.ft.fortheoptionaladditional
bedrooms.
DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT
StaffhasreviewedthepropertyholdingsoftheCityCouncilmembersandhasfoundnoproperty
holdingswithin500feetoftheboundariesofthepropertywhichisthesubjectofthisaction.
Consequently,thisitemdoesnotpresentadisqualifyingrealproperty-relatedfinancialconflictof
interestunderCaliforniaCodeofRegulationsTitle2,section18702.2(a)(11),forpurposesofthe
Political Reform Act (Cal. Gov’t Code §87100,et seq.).
Staffisnotindependentlyaware,andhasnotbeeninformedbyanyCityCouncilmembers,ofany
other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter.
LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS
TheCity’sStrategicPlanhasfivemajorgoals:OperationalExcellence,EconomicVitality,Healthy
Community,StrongandSecureNeighborhoodsandaConnectedCommunity.TheProject
implementstheStrongandSecureNeighborhoodsStrategicgoalbyprovidingconstructionofa
developmentprojectinamannerthatensurescodecompliance,publichealthandsafetyofthe
community.
CURRENT YEAR FISCAL IMPACT
Therearenofiscalimpactsduringthecurrentfiscalyearfromtheprocessingoftheproject.Allcosts
forprojectprocessingarecoveredbythedepositaccountpaidforbytheapplicant.Costsassociated
withtheprocessingoffutureimplementingpermitswillalsobecoveredbypermitfeesordeposit
accounts.
ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT
TheProjectisprivatelyownedandoperatedandwillnotcreatefutureexpendituresfortheCity
associated with approval of the item, including facility maintenance and operations.
ATTACHMENTS
1)Locator Map
2)Disclosure Statement
3)R-17B Architectural Plans
4)R-17B Civil Engineering Plans
5)R-17B Landscape Plans
Staff Contact: Stan Donn, AICP, Senior Planner
City of Chula VistaPage 6 of 6Printed on 8/4/2016
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 216
RESOLUTION __________
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVINGAN APPEAL FORDESIGN
REVIEW PERMIT DR15-0024 TO CONSTRUCT A 78-UNIT
MULTI-FAMILY DUPLEX DEVELOPMENT WITH TWO-CAR
GARAGES, RECREATION AREAS, AND ASSOCIATED
OPEN SPACE ON 4.7 ACRES WITHIN THE OTAY RANCH
VILLAGE TWO, NEIGHBORHOOD R-17B(b)
I.RECITALS
WHEREAS, on September 24, 2015, a duly verified application for a Design
Review Permit was filed with the City of Chula Vista Development Services Department
by HeritageBuilding and Development, Inc. (Applicant); and
WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised, namely
June 22, 2016, at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the
Planning Commission and the hearing was thereafter closed; and
WHEREAS, on June 22, 2016the Planning Commission did not reach a decision
onDesignReview Permit due to lack of majority vote; and
WHEREAS, onJune 27, 2016an appeal was filed by Baldwin & Sons; and
WHEREAS, staff recommends that, based upon the findings made, the City
Council approve the appealand grant approval for Design Review application DR15-
0024; and
WHEREAS, The Director of Development Services has reviewed the Project for
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and determined that
the Project was covered by previously adopted FSEIR 12-01 for the Otay Ranch Villages
Two, Three and a Portion of Four Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan. Therefore, no
further environmental or documentation is required; and
WHEREAS, the City Clerk set the time and place for the hearing on the appeal
requestand notices of said hearing, together with its purposes given by its publication in
a newspaper of general circulation in the city, and its mailings to property ownerswithin
500 feet of the exterior boundaries of the project siteat least ten (10) days prior to the
hearing; and
WHEREAS, the duly called and notified public hearing on the appeal was heard
before the City Council ofthe City of Chula Vista on July 26, 2016 in the Council
Chambers in City Hall, Chula Vista Civic Center, 276 Fourth Avenue, at 5:00 p.m.
II.DESIGN REVIEW FINDINGS/APPROVAL
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Councilof the City of
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 217
Resolution No. ______
Page 2
Chula Vista that it makes the following findings:
1.That the proposed project is consistent with thedevelopment regulations of the
Village Two Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan and Planned Community (PC)
District Regulations.
Neighborhood R-17B(b)is designated Residential Multi-Family (RM2) in the PC
District regulations of the Otay Ranch Village Two SPA Plan. The proposed multi-
family use is permitted and meets all of the development regulations as stipulated in
the Otay Ranch Village Two PC District Regulations as conditioned.
The allowable density on the site is a total of 96 units. The Applicant is proposing to
build a total of 78 units. Each duplex building includes a two-car garage in addition
to guest parking. The project requires 209 parking spaces, which are provided by 156
garage spaces and 24 open parking spaces located onsite. For the balance of the 209
spaces, the applicant proposes to utilize 29 of the 57 available on-street parking
spaces fronting the project for additional parking, including 26 for guest parking.The
total building height is 28-ft for two-story buildings and 37 feet for optional three-
story buildings, whereas the maximum building height per the Residential Guidelines
is 60-ft. The lot area, floor area ratio, and setback requirements are subject to Design
Review (DR).
2.The proposed project is consistent with the design and development standards of the
Otay Ranch Village Two SPA Design Plan.
Theproject is in compliance with the Multi-Family Design Guidelines of the Otay
Ranch Village Two SPA Design Plan, and is consistent with the SPA density
requirements. Enhanced architectural details are proposed along the street elevations
and the layout of the site provides for a pedestrian oriented design per the Otay Ranch
Village 2 SPA Plan.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL, BASED ON THE
FINDINGS ABOVE, hereby approves the Design Review Permit subject to the following
conditions:
The following shall be accomplished to the satisfaction of the DevelopmentServices
Director, or designee, prior to issuance of building permits, unless otherwise specified:
Planning Division
1.The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans,
which include site plan, floor plan, landscape plan and elevation plan on file in the
Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, and Title 19.
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 218
Resolution No. ______
Page 3
2.Prior to, or in conjunction with the issuance of the first building permit, Applicant
shall pay all applicable fees, including any unpaid balances of permit processing fees
for deposit account DQ-3060.
3.Prior to the approval of building permits, the Applicant shall submit building plans
specifying colors and materials consistent with the colors and materials shown on the
site plan, elevations and materialsboard submitted to the City Council and on file in
the Planning Department.
4.A graffiti resistant treatment shall be specified on the building plan for all wall and
building surfaces. This shall be noted for any building, and wall plans and shall be
reviewed and approved by the Director of Development Services prior to the issuance
of building permits. Additionally, the project shall conform to Section 9.20.055 of
the Chula Vista Municipal Code (CVMC)regarding graffiti control.
5.All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment
and/or projections shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent
properties and streets as required by the Director of Development Services. Such
screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed
to the satisfaction of the Director of Development Services.
6.All ground mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc.,
shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a
combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the
satisfaction of the Director of Development Services.
7.All exterior lighting shall include shielding to remove any glare from adjacent
residents. Details for said lighting shall be included in the architectural plans and
shall be reviewed and approved to the satisfaction of the Director of Development
Services, prior to the issuance of anybuilding permit.
8.The applicant shall provide 0.5 parking spaces for each additional bedroom above
four bedrooms per unit. Prior to issuance of building permits for any residential units
containing over four bedrooms, the applicant shall provide verification that an
additional 0.5 parking spaces per bedroom over four bedrooms is provided. A
maximum of 50% of the on-street parking directly adjacent to the project street
frontage may be utilized to accommodate the required and guest parking for the
project.
9.The maximum number of 3-story buildings shall be 27.
Building Division
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 219
Resolution No. ______
Page 4
10.The Applicant shall comply with 2013 California Building Code (CBC), California
Mechanical Code (CMC), California Plumbing Code (CPC), California Electrical
Code (CEC), California Fire Code (CFC), the 2008 California Energy Code (CEC),
and the 2013 California Green Building Standards, as adopted and amended by the
State of California and the City of Chula Vista.
Land Development Division/Landscape Architecture Division
11.The Applicant shall meet all park obligations relating to the proposed 16 multi-family
condos in accordance with the provisions of the Village 2 Parks Agreement executed
10-31-14.
12.The Applicant shall comply with the 2015 update to Chapter 20.12 of the CVMC, the
Landscape Water Conservation Ordinance.
13.The Applicant shall comply with all applicable conditions of Tentative Map No. 12-
05.
14.The Applicant shall be required to pay EngineeringFees based on the final approved
building plans for the project, which include, but are not limited to the following:
Sewer Connection and Capacity Fee
Traffic Signal Fee
Public Facilities Development Impact Fees
Eastern Transportation Development ImpactFees
Other Engineering Fees as applicable per Master Fee Schedule
15.The Applicant shall be required to pay additional deposits or fees in accordance with
the City Subdivision Manual, and Master Fee Schedule with the submittal of the
following items:
Grading Plans
Street Improvement Plans
Final Map
16.The Applicant shall pay the Park Acquisition and Development (PAD) fee per
dwelling unit prior to the issuance of the first Building Permit in accordance with
CVMC 17.10.100. The PAD fee is adjusted on an annual basis on October 1 based on
the Engineer Construction Cost Index.The amount of the PAD fee shall be the
amount in place at the time of Building Permit approval.The project shall comply
with all conditions related to PAD fees as stipulated in the Village 2 Park Agreement.
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 220
Resolution No. ______
Page 5
17.Prior to the approval of the building permit, the Owner/Applicant shall submit
duplicate copies of all commercial, industrial or multifamily projects in digital
format, such as (DXF) graphic file, on a CD or through e-mail based on California
State Plane Coordinate System (NAD 83, Zone 6) in accordance with the City’s
Guidelines for Digital Submittal. DXF file shall include a utility plan showing any
and all proposed sewer or storm drain on site.
18.All driveways shall conform to the City of Chula Vista’s sight distance requirements
in accordance with Section 12.12.130 of the CVMC.Also, landscaping, street
furniture, or signs shall not obstruct the visibility of a driver at the street intersections
or driveways.
The Applicant shall obtain a Land Development Permit prior to beginning any
19.
earthwork activities at the site and before issuance of Building Permits in accordance
with CVMCTitle 15.04.The Applicantshall submit Grading Plans in conformance
with the City’s Subdivision Manual and the City’s Development Storm Water Manual
requirements, including, but not limited to the following:
Grading Plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and approved
by the City Engineer.
Drainage Study and Geotechnical/Soils Investigations are required with the
firstsubmittal of Grading Plans.The Drainage Study shall calculate the Pre-
Development and Post-Development flows and show how downstream
properties and storm drain facilities are impacted.Design shall incorporate
detention of storm water runoff if Post-Development flows exceed Pre-
Development flows; analysis shall include flows from 2 yr., 10 y.r, and 50 yr.
return frequency storms.
Drainage study shall also demonstrate that no property damage will occur
during the 100-year storm event.
Drainage study shall show any offsite flows.
All onsite drainage facilities shall be private.
Any offsite work will require Letters of Permission from the property
owner(s).
st
20.The Applicant shall provide 2 copies of the following technical reports with the 1
submittal of grading plans:
Drainage study
Water Quality Technical Report (WQTR)
Geotechnical Report
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 221
Resolution No. ______
Page 6
21.Applicant shall obtain encroachment permits for temporary improvements (such as
fence, asphalt ramps, signs, etc.) located in the street right of way, City easements or
City owned Open Space Lots prior to construction of such improvements.
22.The project shall comply with all requirements of the Chula Vista Development
Storm Water Manual (Storm Water Manual) for both construction and post-
construction phases of the project.Prior to Building Permit approval, The Applicant
shall provide documentation, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, to demonstrate
such compliance.
23.Site design shall include features to meet NPDES Municipal Permit Standards.These
features shall maximize infiltration and minimize impervious land coverage while
conveying storm water runoff.
24.The site runoff shall be directed to a bioretentionBMP.ThebioretentionBMP shall
be designedin accordance with criteria establishedin the Countywide Model SUSMP
and the California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA) Storm Water Best
Management Practices Handbook, BMP # TC-32. Details of thebioretention facility
shall be shown on the plan.
25.The Owner shall enter into a Storm Water Management Facilities Maintenance
Agreement to perpetually maintain private BMP’s located within the project prior to
issuance of any Grading or Building Permits, whichever occurs first.
26.The Owner shall file a Final Map in accordance with Sections 66426 and 66427 of
the Subdivision Map Act should Owner propose condominium units for the project.
The Owner shall enter into an agreement prior to approval of the Final Map to secure
all Public Improvements required for the development of the Project.
27.Owner/Applicantshall fund the projects fair share and/or install transit stop facilities
within the Tentative Map boundary when directed by the Director of Public Works.
The improvement plans for said stops shall be prepared in accordance with the transit
stop details described in the Village Two, Three and a Portion of Four Design Plan
and Village Two, Three and a Portion of Four PFFP and as approved by the Directors
of Development Services and Public Works.
28.Prior to the issuance of any Building Permit, the Applicant shall submit Improvement
Plans in conformance with the City’s Subdivision Manual and obtain a Construction
Permit.The Improvement Plan shall include but not be limited to:
Removal and replacement of any broken or damaged curb, gutter, and
sidewalkper SDRSD G-2, and G-7along the project’s frontage to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer. Sidewalk shall be designed and constructed
with proper transitions to existing conditions.
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 222
Resolution No. ______
Page 7
Additional asphalt paving for the replacement of the existing curb, gutter and
sidewalk.
Installation of curb, gutter, and sidewalk per SDRSD G-3alongtheproject’s
frontage. Sidewalk shall be designed and constructed with proper transitions
to existing conditions.
Install a Concrete bus pad and a bus shelter on Santa Diana Road.
Relocation of existing utilities, as determined by the City Engineer.
29.The Applicant shall obtain any and all permits required for the installation of public
utilities (gas, electric, water, cable, telephone).
30.The Applicant shall secure the construction and completion of all improvements,
including offsite improvements and those surrounding the Project, in accordance with
Section 18.16.180of the CVMC.
31.For the proposed private sewer facilities, manholes shall be used where 6” mains or
larger are connected to public sewer.
32.The onsite sewer and storm drain system shall be private.All sewer laterals and
storm drains shall be privately maintained by the Applicant, until such time as the
facilities are transferred to an HOA or other party, from each building unit to the
City-maintained public facilities.
33.The Applicant shall design all proposed sidewalks, walkways, pedestrian ramps, and
disabled parking to meet the City of Chula Vista Design Standards, ADA Standards,
and Title 24 standards, as applicable.
34.Prior to Grading or Street Improvement Plan approval, the Owner/Applicant shall
upload copies of the Street Improvement Plan, Grading Plan, and Site Improvement
Plan in digital format such as AutoCAD DWG or DXF (AutoCAD version 2000 or
above), ESRI GIS shapefile, file, or personal geodatabase (ArcGIS version 9.0 or
above).The files should be transmitted directly to the GIS section using the city's
digital submittalfile upload website at http://www.chulavistaca.gov/goto/GIS.The
data upload site only accepts zip formatted files.
35.Prior to Improvement Plan or Building Permit approval, whichever occurs first, the
Applicant shall obtain an Encroachment Permit for any private facilities within public
right-of-way or City easement.
Fire Department
36.The Applicant shall apply for and obtain all required building permits. Permits shall
complywith applicable codes and requirements, including but not limited to: the
current California edition of Building Code (CBC), Fire Code (CFC), Mechanical
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 223
Resolution No. ______
Page 8
Code, and Residential Code as adopted and amended by the State of California and
the City of Chula Vista.
II.The following on-going conditions shall apply to the project site as long as it relies on
this approval:
1.The Applicantshall develop and maintain the site in accordance with the approved
plans, which include site plans, floor plan, and elevation plan on file in the Planning
Division, the conditions contained herein, and Title 19, until such time as this
obligation is assumed by a successor in interest or HOA, if established.
2.The Applicant shall install all landscaping and hardscape improvements in
accordance with the approved landscape plan.
3.Approval of the Design Review Permit does not waive Owner’s/Applicant’s
obligation to comply with all sections of Title 19 of the CVMC, and all other
applicable laws and regulations in effect at the time of building permit issuance. The
Applicant shall be responsible for complying with all such laws and regulations.
4.The Property Owner and Applicant shall and do agree to indemnify, protect, defend
and hold harmless City, its City Council members, officers, employees and
representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands,
claims and costs, including court costs and attorney’s fees (collectively, liabilities)
incurred by the City arising, directly or indirectly, from (a) City’s approval and
issuance of this Design Review Permit and (b) City’s approval or issuance of any
other permit or action, whether discretionary or non-discretionary, in connection with
the use contemplated on the project site. The Property Owner and Applicant shall
acknowledge their agreement to this provision by executing a copy of this Design
Review Permit where indicated below. The Property Owner’s and Applicant’s
compliance with this provision shall be binding on any and all of the Property
Owner’s and Applicant’s successors and assigns.
5.This Design Review Permit shall become void and ineffective if not utilized within
three years from the effective date thereof, in accordance with Section 19.14.600 of
the CVMC; July27, 2019.
III. GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 66020 NOTICE
Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d)(1), NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN
that the 90 day period to protest the imposition of any impact fee, dedication,
reservation, or other exaction described in this resolution begins on the effective date
of this resolution and any such protest must be in a manner that complies with Section
66020(a) and failure to follow timely this procedure will bar any subsequent legal
action to attack, set aside, void or annual imposition. The right to protest the fees,
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 224
Resolution No. ______
Page 9
dedications, reservations, or other exactions does not apply to planning, zoning,
grading, or other similar application processing fees or service fees in connection with
the project; and it does not apply to any fees, dedication, reservations, or other
exactions which have been given notice similar to this, nor does it revive challenges to
any fees for which the Statute of Limitations has previously expired.
IV.EXECUTION OF RESOLUTION OF APPROVAL
The Property Owner and Applicant shall execute this document signing on the lines
provided below, indicating that the Property Owner and Applicant have each read,
understood and agreed to the conditions contained herein, and will implement same.
Upon execution, this document shall be signed and returned to the City’s
Development Services Department.
_______________________________________________________
Signature of Property OwnerDate
Village 2 R-17B(b)
______________________________
Printed Name of Property Owner
_______________________________________________________
Signature of ApplicantDate
________________________________
Printed Name of Applicant
V.CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE OF CONDITIONS
If any of the foregoing conditions fail to occur, or if they are, by their terms, to be
implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so
implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to
revoke or modify all approvals herein granted, deny, or further condition issuance of all
future building permits, deny, revoke, or further condition all certificates of occupancy
issued under the authority of approvals herein granted, institute and prosecute litigation
to compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation.
Failure to satisfy the conditions of this permit may also result in the imposition of civil
or criminal penalties.
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 225
Resolution No. ______
Page 10
VI.INVALIDITY; AUTOMATIC REVOCATION
It is the intention of the City Councilthat its adoption of this Resolution is dependent
upon the enforceability of each and every term, provision and condition herein stated;
and that in the event that any one or more terms, provisions or conditions are
determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal or
unenforceable, this resolution and the permit shall be deemed to be automatically
revoked and of no further force and effect.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council, based on the evidence
presented, hereby approvesthe appeal and grants approval for DR15-0024.
Presented by:Approved as to form by:
_____________________________________________
Kelly Broughton, FSALAGlen R. Googins
Development ServicesDirectorCity Attorney
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 226
T
S
A
I
R
E
T
N
E
P
R
A
C
D
R
G
N
I
H
S
R
E
P
D
R
FUTURE
A
N
A
I
D
SCHOOL
A
T
N
A
S
S1
D
FUTURE
R
A
PARK
N
I
S
D
L
R
FUTURE A
P2
OA
I
N
R
O
R
T
T
C
I
A MF
A
V
A
C
T
N
A
A
R28
S
L
FUTURE
E
A
X
T
FUTURE MF
I
NA
MF
A
R16b
A
S
R17A & R17B(a)
V
S
FUTURE
D
AR
A
N
G
MIXED USE
E
T
T
R
A
RD
N
O
AS
MO
MU1
I
V
FUTURE
Y
T
E
E
R
AT
PARK
S
R17B (b)
V
K
S
C
E
AK
P1
N
T
A
C
H
R
I
S
T
FUTURE
I
N
A
SF
A
R27
V
R19a
FUTURE
F
PROJECT
T
R
E
A
E
H
R
T
MF S
S
A
N
R19b W
LOCATION
TS
N
A
R
A
E
T
S
C
A
R
FUTURE
O
L
I
MF N
FUTURE
A
R25A
PARK
R
D
P5
LOCATOR
FUTURE
SCHOOL
DR15-0024
S2
NORTH
CHULA VISTA DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
LOCATOR
ORV2, R17B(b) Lovina
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
PROJECT
DESIGN REVIEW
APPLICANT:
SEC Santa Christina Av &
Project Summary: Proposal for 78 residential unis (39 duplex buildings) and
PROJECT
ADDRESS:
Santa Victoria Rd
associated open space and parking
SCALE:
FILE NUMBER:
DR15-0024
No Scale
NORTH
Related cases:
j:\\planning\\public notices\\dr\\dr150024 8x10.ai
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 227
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 228
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 229
LOVINA / R-17B(b)
PROJECT NO. DR15-0024
LOVINA / R-17B(b)
PROJECT NO. DR15-0024
LOVINA / R-17B(b)
PROJECT NO. DR15-0024
LOVINA / R-17B(b)
PROJECT NO. DR15-0024
LOVINA / R-17B(b)
PROJECT NO. DR15-0024
LOVINA / R-17B(b)
PROJECT NO. DR15-0024
LOVINA / R-17B(b)
PROJECT NO. DR15-0024
LOVINA / R-17B(b)
PROJECT NO. DR15-0024
LOVINA / R-17B(b)
PROJECT NO. DR15-0024
LOVINA / R-17B(b)
PROJECT NO. DR15-0024
LOVINA / R-17B(b)
PROJECT NO. DR15-0024
LOVINA / R-17B(b)
PROJECT NO. DR15-0024
LOVINA / R-17B(b)
PROJECT NO. DR15-0024
LOVINA / R-17B(b)
PROJECT NO. DR15-0024
LOVINA / R-17B(b)
PROJECT NO. DR15-0024
LOVINA / R-17B(b)
PROJECT NO. DR15-0024
LOVINA / R-17B(b)
PROJECT NO. DR15-0024
8"8"8"8"
LOVINA / R-17B(b)
PROJECT NO. DR15-0024
PROJECT NO. DR15-0024
PROJECT NO. DR15-0024
LOVINA / R-17B(b)
PROJECT NO. DR15-0024
LOVINA / R-17B(b)
PROJECT NO. DR15-0024
LOVINA / R-17B(b)
PROJECT NO. DR15-0024
LOVINA / R-17B(b)
PROJECT NO. DR15-0024
LOVINA / R-17B(b)
PROJECT NO. DR15-0024
8"8"8"8"
LOVINA / R-17B(b)
PROJECT NO. DR15-0024
PROJECT NO. DR15-0024
PROJECT NO. DR15-0024
0 ¦¤ 259
1
!¦¤£ Packet
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ
0 ¦¤ 260
!¦¤£ Packet
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ
0 ¦¤ 261
!¦¤£ Packet
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ
0 ¦¤ 262
DESCRIPTION
SHEET:
DATE
DATE:
LOVINA / R-17B (b) (DR15-0024)
NO.
Public Walkway by Others
Hedge and low fence as a
See Enlargements Sheet
Monument (See Sht. L-3)
Shrub and GroundcoverSanta Ivy Improvements
Decorative Entry Paving
2 Backbone Landscape
Per Otay Ranch Village
Directory Signage- See
Space) with Small Tot
Lot. See Enlargement
Trees, Walkways and
Private Patio Space-Private Patio Space-
Circular Benches at
Private Open Space
Mail Box Locations-and Gates to Patios
Scale: 1" = 20'-0"
Paseo with Accent
See Enlargements
Pocket Park (Open
Improvements- ByLow Vinyl Fencing
Secondary Entry
Bench Seating
See Sheet L-5
Intersections
park barrier
Sheet L- 4
Sheet L-5
Sheet L-3
Plantings
Others
L- 4
Public Walkway by Others
Bldg 10Bldg 11Bldg 12Bldg 13Bldg 14Bldg 15
Ranch Village 2 Backbone Landscape
Keck Avenue Improvements Per Otay
Bldg 39
Bldg 37
Bldg 38Bldg 36
Bldg 16
Village 2 Backbone Landscape Improvements-Bldg 9
Improvements- By Others
Santa Victoria Improvements Per Otay Ranch
Bldg 17
Bldg 8
By Others
Bldg 33
Bldg 34Bldg 18
Bldg 32Bldg 35
Bldg 7
PARK SITE
Public Walkway by
Bldg 31
Bldg 29
Bldg 30Bldg 28
Bldg 19
Bldg 6
Street Scene 2- Typical Front Elevation. See Sheet L-3
Street Scene 3- Typical Alley Elevation. See Sheet L-4
Others
Bldg 20
Bldg 5
Possible Future Transit Stop
Bldg 25
Bldg 24
Bldg 21
Bldg 26
Bldg 27
Bldg 4
Bldg 2
Bldg 23
Bldg 1
Bldg 22
Bldg 3
Street Scene 1- Entry. See Sheet L-3
with Accent Trees, Walkways
Private Open Space Paseo
Pocket Park (Open Space)
See Enlargements Sheet
Enlargements Sheet L- 4
and Circular Benches at
Enlargements Sheet L-3
Shrub and Groundcover
Improvements Per OtayMajor Entry Monument.
Enlargements Sheet L- 4
Decorative Entry Paving
Plantings. See Legend
and Gates (Typical) toDirectory Signage- See
Backbone Landscape
with Picnic Area- See
Private Patio Space
Public Walkway byMail Box Locations-
Low Vinyl FencingPrivate Patio Space
Improvements- By
Primary Entry and
See Sheet L-5 for
Ranch Village 2
Santa Christina
Typical- SeeIntersections
Typical- See
Sheet L-5
Sheet L-5
Elevation
OthersOthers
Patios
L-3
!¦¤£ Packet
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ
0 ¦¤ 263
DESCRIPTION
SHEET:
DATE
(REQUIRED AT 200 SQ FT PER DWELLING
DATE:
LOVINA / R-17B (b) (DR15-0024)
NO.
(REQUIRED AT 100 SQ FT PER UNIT
FENCING/STREETSCENE ELEVATIONS AND
UNIT FOR TOTAL OF 15,600 SQ FT
PRIVATE PATIO OPEN SPACE
3'-6" TALL VINYL FENCING
COMMON COMMUNITY OPEN
SEE SHEET L-5 FOR FENCING DETAIL
** NOTE: SEE SHEET L-4 AND L-5 FOR
Scale: 1" = 20'-0"
FOR TOTAL OF 7,800 SQ FT
AVERAGE PER DWELLING
OPEN SPACE LEGEND
5'-6" VINYL FENCING
SPACE = 20,986 SQ FT
A
4
4
4
UNIT = 437.3 SQ FT 4
FENCE LEGEND
= 30,895 SQ FT
REQUIRED)
REQUIRED)
Bldg 10Bldg 11Bldg 12Bldg 13Bldg 14Bldg 15
Bldg 39
Bldg 37
Bldg 38Bldg 36
Bldg 16
Bldg 9
Bldg 17
Bldg 8
Bldg 33
Bldg 34Bldg 18
Bldg 32Bldg 35
Bldg 7
PARK SITE
Bldg 31
Bldg 29
Bldg 30Bldg 28
Bldg 19
Bldg 6
Bldg 20
Bldg 5
Bldg 25
Bldg 24
Bldg 21
Bldg 26
Bldg 27
Bldg 4
Bldg 2
Bldg 23
Bldg 1
Bldg 22
Bldg 3
!¦¤£ Packet
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ
0 ¦¤ 264
DESCRIPTION
SHEET:
DATE
DATE:
LOVINA / R-17B (b) (DR15-0024)
NO.
10'
Decorative Paving
Groundcover
Public Entry
and Shrub
Plantings
walkway
Charcoal BBQs (2)
Seat Wall
Private Park with Picnic Area off Santa Christina Entry
26'
Trellis to be Wood Construction
Entry Monument and Signage.
Provide Dining Furnishing.
Overhead Wood Trellis on
Scored Concrete Paving.
Lovina Primary Entry Monument and Park (Off Santa Chrisitna Rd.)
with Dark Brown Stain
See Renderings
Hedge Barrier
22'
Bench Seating
Public Walkway and Parkway- NAP
14'3"
3'6"
Scale: 3/16" = 1'-0"
6'8"
Wall for Park
Barrier
Seat
Bench Seating on Concrete Pads
Entry Monument and Signage.
Santa Christina Rd
See Renderings
Released Off of Stucco Pilaster
Santa Ivy Rd
Metal Decorative Emblem
Metal Lettering Released
Off of Stucco Wall
4'-6"
Lovina Primary Entry Monument and Park (Off Santa Chrisitna Rd.)
Lovina Primary Entry Monument and Park (Off Santa Chrisitna Rd.)
Private Patio with Low Vinyl
3'-10"
Private Park with Tot Lot off Santa Ivy Entry
Fencing Surround
distance circles area estimated in
ADA Accessible Surfacing with
Tot Lot Equipment TBD. Fall
Satillo Tile Pavers or
Brick Cap (or Alike)Fence Barrier
this graphic
Hedge and
Stucco Wall and
Battered White
Pilaster
Scale: 3/16" = 1'-0"
!¦¤£ Packet
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ
0 ¦¤ 265
DESCRIPTION
SHEET:
DATE
DATE:
LOVINA / R-17B (b) (DR15-0024)
NO.
Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0"
Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0"
Typical Street Scenes
(Rendered: 2 story option of Building 200-B, 3 story option of Building 100-A and 2 story option of Building 200-A). See Site Plan for Scene Location
(Rendered: 3 story option of Building 100-A and 2 story option of Building 200-B). See Site Plan for Scene Location
Neighborhood R-17 Lovina - Otay Ranch Village 2
STREET SCENE 1- PRIMARY ENTRY STREET SCENE
STREET SCENE 2- TYPICAL FRONT STREET SCENE
!¦¤£ Packet
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ
0 ¦¤ 266
DESCRIPTION
SHEET:
DATE
DATE:
LOVINA / R-17B (b) (DR15-0024)
NO.
Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0"
NTS
8.5'
Walkway by others
5.5'
(Rendered: 2 story option of Building 200-A, 3 story option of Building 100-A and 2 story option of Building 200-B). See Site Plan for Scene Location
pictured here. Depths vary 8.5' to 14'
Patio Depths Vary Based On Unit
Minimum dimension from face of
building to patio fence is 8.5' as
Locations and Unit Type-
Patio Furnishing
Homeowner
Provided By
TYPICAL PATIO ENLARGEMENT
9'
A
7'
Front Elevation of Vinyl Fence
A
Depths From Patio Wall
Fencing (at break point
Groundcover Plantings
3.5' High Vinyl Fencing
Fence Drops to 3' High
Break Point in Fence-
Patio Shrub Plantings
5' Side yard (Typical)
Perimeter Shrub and
5' 6" Vinyl Side Yard
18" and 36" Planter
Parkway By Others
to Public Walkway
Street Trees and
drops to 3' high)
Concrete Patio
in 18" Planter
and Gate
NTS
RESIDENTIAL UNIT
- See plan view to the right for break points where
FRONT ELEVATION OF VINYL FENCING (A-A)
- Refer to overall fence plan sheet 2 for layout
STREET SCENE 3- TYPICAL ALLEY SCENE
fence transitions from 3' to 5'-6"
- Vinyl fencing to be white or tan
Side Yard
5'
5'6"
NOTES:
3'
!¦¤£ Packet
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ
0 ¦¤ 267
DESCRIPTION
SHEET:
DATE
DATE:
LOVINA / R-17B (b) (DR15-0024)
NO.
MODEL WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE BY THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA WHICH PROHIBITS OVERHEAD SPRAY IRRIGATION IN CERTAINMORE DETAILED THAN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE WEALLOWANCE (MAWA) FOR THE DEVELOPMENT. A FULL LANDSCAPEDOCUMENT
PACKAGE, PER THE LANDSCAPE WATER CONSERVATION
LANDSCAPE CONDITIONS. IF THE STATE ORDINANCE IS MORE STRICT ORTHE ESTIMATED TOTAL WATER USE (ETWU) OF THE IRRIGATION SYSTEMWILL BE DESIGNED TO WORK WITHIN THE MAXIMUM APPLIED WATERORDINANCE
WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED AND APPROVED PRIOR
WHERE APPLICABLE DRIP IRRIGATION SHALL BE UTILIZED PER THE NEW
Min. Distance to Street Tree
ALL REQUIRED PLANTING AREAS SHALL BE COVERED WITH MULCH TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 3 INCHES, EXCLUDING SLOPESREQUIRING REVEGETATION AND AREAS PLANTED WITH GROUNDCOVER. ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS
WITHOUT VEGETATION
20 feetIntersections (intersecting curb lines of two streets)25 feet
10 feet10 feet10 feet
2. TO PROVIDE FUNCTIONAL, BEAUTIFUL AND AMENITY-RICH SPACES FOR RESIDENCES OF
1. TO PROVIDE AN AESTHETICALLY PLEASING, COLORFUL LANDSCAPE THAT ACCENTS THE
CLIMATE AND TO PROVIDE A WATER CONSERVING DRIP IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO IRRIGATE
5 feet
7. THE PLANT PALLETE LISTED PROVIDES A CANDIDATE LIST OF PLANTS TO SELECT FROM
WHEN FINAL DESIGNING THE LANDSCAPE FOR THE PROJECT. HOWEVER SUBSTITUTIONS
5. TO PROVIDE A DESIGN THAT SATISFIES THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODES
ALL WATER, SEWER, AND GAS UTILITIES SHALL BE EFFECTIVELY SCREENED WITH PLANT MATERIAL AT THE TIME OF PLANT
THE DESIGN OBJECTIVES RELATED TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE FOR THIS PROJECT6. ALL NEW LANDSCAPE WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS:
BUILDING'S ARCHITECTURE AND ENHANCES THE SURROUNDING OTAY RANCH 'SANTA
3. TO ENHANCE THE OTAY RANCH STREET SCENE AND PROVIDE CONTEXTUAL DESIGN
CONSERVATION CALCULATIONS SHALL DEMONSTRATE CONFORMANCE. SEE WATERAND ORDINANCES AS WELL AS A PROJECT THAT EMPHASIZES SAFETY IN THE BUILT
4. TO PROVIDE DROUGHT TOLERANT PLANT MATERIAL SUITED TO THE CHULA VISTA
OR ADDITIONS MAY BE NECESSARY DUE TO AVAILABILITY, SOIL TESTING OR OTHER
SHALL FOLLOW THE STRICTER OF THE TWO PUBLICATIONS,
SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY THE OWNER. THE LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL BE MAINTAINED FREE OF DEBRIS AND
LITTER AND ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A HEALTHY GROWING CONDITION. DISEASED OR DEAD
RECOMMENDATIONS FROM A SOIL TESTING LABORATORY AND/OR LANDSCAPE
- THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA LANDSCAPE WATER CONSERVATION ORDINANCE
8. ALL SOILS WILL BE AMENDED, FERTILIZED AND TILLED TO CONFORM WITH
SAID LANDSCAPE WITHOUT OVER-SPRAY AND WATER WASTE. THE WATER
- THE MONTECITO VILLAGE CORE AND BUSINESS DISTRICT SPECIFIC PLAN
NO TREE OR SHRUB EXCEEDING 3' IN HEIGHT SHALL BE PLANTED WITHIN 10' OF ANY PUBLIC SEWER FACILITIES.
THE LOVINA DEVELOPMENT TO ENJOY AND UTILIZE ON A DAILY BASIS.
NON-BIODEGRADEABLE ROOT BARRIERS SHALL BE INSTALLED AROUND ALL TREES WITHIN 10' OF HARDSCAPE
PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE SATISFACTORILY TREATED OR REPLACED PER THE CONDITIONS OF THIS PERMIT.
- CITY OF CHULA VISTA DESIGN GUIDELINES AND MUNICIPAL CODES
SURFACES (FOOTINGS, WALLS, SIDEWALKS, OR ANY OTHER HARDSCAPE ELEMENT). MINIMUM DEPTH OF 18"
ARCHITECT TO PROMOTE VIGOROUS HEALTHY PLANT MATERIAL
IRRIGATION STATEMENT
TO ISSUANCE OF THE BUILDING PERMIT.
- THE APPROVED OTAY RANCH VILLAGE 2 MASTER PLAN
MINIMUM TREE SEPARATION DISTANCE
- THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA GRADING ORDINANCE
DESIGN OBJECTIVE
Above ground utility structures
CONSERVATION STATEMENT THIS SHEET
Traffic signals (stop sign)
Underground utility lines
HAVE SEVERAL PRIMARY GOALS :
Driveway (entries)
BARBARA' CHARACTER.
Improvement
Sewer Lines
ENVIRONMENT.
INFLUENCES.
ELEMENTS
FOR A LENGTH OF 20' CENTERED ON THE TRUNK OF THE TREE.
PLANT MATERIAL NEAR SEWER LINES
SHALL ALSO BE MULCHED TO THIS MINIMUM DEPTH.
MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY
WATER
REQ.
QTY.
ALL REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREAS
ROOT BARRIER NOTE
UTILITY SCREENING
FUNCTION
MULCHING NOTE
EFGCEFGCEFGCEFGCEFGCEFGCEFGC
DAT
EASEASEASEASEASEASEASEASEASEASEASEASEASEASEASEASEASEASEASEASEASEASEASEASEASEASEASEASEASEASEASEASEASEASEAS
INSTALLATION.
SIZE
COMMON NAMESPREAD DIMENSIONS
2-3' O.C.
HEIGHT
VARIESVARIESVARIES
CONTROLLERS SHALL BE USED. WEATHER DATA SHALL BE RECEIVED EITHER ON-SITE OR THROUGH THE CIMIS NETWORK AND CONTROL
APPLICABILITY OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA'S LANDSCAPE WATER CONSERVATION ORDINANCE 2015, CHAPTER 20.12 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODESUB-SURFACE DRIP IRRIGATION SYSTEMS MAY BE EMPLOYED WHERE CONSIDERED
TO BE EFFECTIVE AND FEASIBLE. IRRIGATION VALVESIRRIGATION CONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS FLOW SENSORS, RAIN SHUT OFF DEVICES AND A WEATHER BASED ("SMART") IRRIGATIONTURF WILL BE RESTRICTED
TO HIGHLY VISIBLE STREET FRONT AREAS AND/OR AREAS WHICH MAY RECEIVE SIGNIFICANT AMOUNTS OF USEAND ENJOYMENT BY THE GUESTS AND RESIDENTS. (ALL TURF ON THIS PROJECT IS PROPOSED TO BE
REAL TURF). PLANT MATERIAL WILL BESPECIFIED IN CONSIDERATION OF NORTH, SOUTH, EAST, AND WEST EXPOSURES. SOIL WILL BE AMENDED AND PREPARED TO PROVIDEHEALTHY PLANT GROWTH AND COVERAGE
AND TO PROVIDE FOR MAXIMUM MOISTURE RETENTION AND PERCOLATION. PLANTER BEDS WILL BEAN IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE PROVIDED AS REQUIRED FOR THE PROPER IRRIGATION, DEVELOPMENT AND MAINTENANCE
OF THE
STATES THAT NEW CONSTRUCTION AND REHABILITATED LANDSCAPES WITH A PROPOSED CUMULATIVE LANDSCAPE AREA EQUAL TO ORIN RECOGNITION OF WATER AS A LIMITED RESOURCE IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, THE
FOLLOWING MEASURES WILL BE UNDERTAKEN TOTHE IRRIGATION SYSTEM WILL BE AUTOMATIC AND WILL INCORPORATE LOW VOLUME, LOW PRECIPITATION RATE SPRAY EMITTERS. ASHALL BE SEGREGATED TO ALLOW
FOR THE SYSTEM OPERATION IN RESPONSE TO ORIENTATION AND EXPOSURE. WATER CONSERVINGTHE ESTIMATED TOTAL WATER USE (ETWU) OF THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM WILL BE DESIGNED TO WORK WITHIN THE MAXIMUM
APPLIED WATERALLOWANCE (MAWA) FOR THE DEVELOPMENT. A FULL LANDSCAPE DOCUMENT PACKAGE, PER THE LANDSCAPE WATER CONSERVATION
4'-5'4'-5'4'-5'
2'-3'3'-6'2'-3'2'-4'6'-8'2'-3'5'-6'3'-4'3'-4'3'-4'2'-3'3'-4'2'-3'3'-5'
1'-2'1'-2'
2'-3
12"18"10"
2'3'2'5'2'3'2'2'2'2'3'2'
1'1'1'1'
Stucco Pilaster
Battered White
ORDINANCE WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED AND APPROVED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OR APPROVAL OF THE BUILDING PERMITS.
5'3'
VEGETATION. THE DESIGN OF THE SYSTEM SHALL PROVIDE ADEQUATE SUPPORT OF THE VEGETATION SELECTED.
STICKY MONKEY FLOWER
GREATER THAN 500 SQUARE FEET ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE WATER CONSERVATION ORDINANCE.
HOLLYLEAF REDBERRY
AUSTRALIAN TEA TREE
MEXICAN GRASS TREE
BLACK MONDO GRASS
BIRD-OF-PARADISE
CALIFORNIA ROSE
PINK MELALEUCA
POVERTY WEEDBOUGAINVILLEA
TEXAS RANGER
TEXAS PRIVETSWEET HAKEA
GOOSEBERRY
MULCHED TO RETAIN SOIL MOISTURE AND REDUCE EVAPOTRANSPIRATION FROM THE ROOT ZONES.
CORAL BELLS
SWORD FERNWAX FLOWER
EOUNYMOUS
PENNISETUM
RED YUCCA
ROCKROSE
CONEBUSH
GREVILLEA
MINT BUSH
BOXWOOD
MAT RUSH
FLAX LILY
REDUCE THIS PROJECT'S DEMAND ON THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA'S AVAILABLE WATER SUPPLY:
Satillo Tile Pavers or
CAREX
Brick Cap (or Alike)
(See Plan for Location)
LEUCOPHYLLUM FRUTESCENS
LEPTOSPERMUM LAEVIGATUM
PENNISETUM 'LITTLE BUNNY'
CHAMELAUCIUM UNCINATUMOPHIOPOGON PLANISCAPUS
15'-3"
HESPERALOE PARVIFLORA
MONARDELLA SUBGLABRADASYLIRION LONGISSIMUM
LOMONDRA 'KATIE BELLS'
MELALEUCA NESOPHILA
POLYSTICHUM MUNITUM
BOTANICAL NAME
HEUCHERA SANGUINEA
LEUCADENDRON SPP.
LIGUSTRUM TEXANUMBOUGAINVILLEA SPP.
STRELITZIA REGINAEHAKEA SUAVEOLENS
RHAMNUS ILICIFOLIA
WATER CONSERVATION STATEMENT
ROSA CALIFORNICA
EUONYMOUS SPP.
GREVILLEA SPP.
DIPLACUS SPP.
DIANELLA SPP.
IVA HAYESIANA
CISTUS SPP.
BUXUS SPP.
RIBES SPP.
CAREX SPP
WEATHER BASED IRRIGATION RUN TIME CHANGES.
COMMUNITY MAILBOX CLUSTERS
WATER
REQ.
QTY.
USPS Cluster Maillocations. See Plan
Metal Decorative
Boxes per USPS
Released Off of
FUNCTION
Stucco Pilaster
Standards. (2)
STANDARDS. WITHIN THESE VISIBILITY
INTERSECTIONS AND DRIVEWAYS PER
SIGHT TRIANGLE NOTE
LINES ALL LANDSCAPE, FENCING,
WALLS ETC MUST BE KEPT TO A
CONSTRUCT SIGHT DISTANCE
Emblem
THE CIVIL ENGINEER SHALL
THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
View
TRIANGLE LINES AT ALL
SIZE
HEIGHT LESS THAN 30"
COMMON NAMEFORM AND DIMENSIONS
SPREADHEIGHT
KECK ROAD
SANTA VICTORIA
SANTA CRISTINA
'I AM FAMILIAR WITH AND AGREE TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS FOR LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENT
PLANS AS DESCRIBED IN CHAPTER 20 12 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE I HAVE PREPARED THIS PLAN INCOMPLIANCE WITH THOSE REGULATIONS I CERTIFY THAT THE PLAN IMPLEMENTS THE REGULATIONS TO
SANTA IVY
DAVID MCCULLOUGH, ASLA, RLA
(See Plan for Location)
PYRUS CALLERYANA 'ARISTOCRAT'ARISTOCRAT FLOWERING PEAR
6'-8"
CHINESE TALLOW TREE
CHINESE FLAME TREE
2'-2"
1'-6"
SWEET BAY
PERCENTAGE OF LANDSCAPED AREAS TO SITE = 16.5%
TOTAL LANDSCAPED/PLANTED AREA = 34,097 SQ FT
SIGNATURE:______________________________________NAME:
CERSIS OCCIDENTALIS 'FOREST PANSY'
COMMUNITY DIRECTORY SIGNAGE
LYONOTHAMNUS FLORIBUNDUS
LAURUS NOBLIS 'SARATOGA'
SYAGRUS ROMANZOFFIANUM
CUPRESSUS SEMPERVIRENS
HYMENOSPORUM FLAVUM
ELAEOCARPUS DECIPENS
KOELRUTERIA BIPINNATA
3'
PHOENIX DACTALIFERA
LAGERSTROEMIA SPP.
TRISTANIA CONFERTA
SAPIUM SEBERFERUM
TOTAL SITE AREA = 205,539 SQ FT
PINUS CANARIENSISCYATHEA COOPERI
PROVIDE EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE WATER USE "
BOTANICAL NAME
DRACAENA SPP.
CORDYLINE SPP
LANDSCAPE AREAS
Satillo Tile Pavers or
Brick Cap (or Alike)
Released Off of
Wood Posts w/
Metal Lettering
Battered White
Wood Panels
Stucco Wall
Dark Stain
!¦¤£ Packet
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ
City of Chula Vista
Staff Report
File#:16-0398, Item#: 10.
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9 (d)(1)
Name of case:A)John Kilpatrick v. City of Chula Vista, Office of Administrative Hearings
(OAH), Case No. 2016040774; and
B)Karen R. Escobedo as Trustee of the Irving A. Escobedo and Karen R.
Escobedo Family Trust v. City of Chula Vista, San Diego Superior Court, Case
No. 37-2015-00007825-CU-PO-CTL.
City of Chula VistaPage 1 of 1Printed on 8/4/2016
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΗȃΏΘ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 268