HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrd 2016-3360 ORDII�'ANCE NO. 3360
ORDII�'.ANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AI�4ENDIIvG
ORDIl�?AI�TCE NO. 3064 RELATI?�'G TO PEDESTRIA_�'
BR]DGE DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE FOR OTAY RANCH
VILLAGES ONE. Tli'O. FIVE. AI`TD SIX RELATING TO THE
ANI�TUAL REVIEVI' AND ADJUSTA4EI�'T OF FEES
WHEREAS, the City's General Plan Land Use and Pubiic Facilities Elements require
that adequate public facilities be available to accommodate increased population created bv new
developmenr, and
�1%HEREAS, the City Council has determined that ne��- de��elopment within cenain azeas
ti�ithin the City of Chula Vista as identified in this ordinance. ���ill create adverse impacts on
certain e�isting public facilities w�hich must be mitigated by the financing and construction of
those facilities identified in this ordinance: and
R%HEREAS, de��elopers of land ��ithin the Cin� are required to mitisate the burden
created by their development b}� constructing or improving those facilities needed to provide
service to their respective developments or bv the pa}�ment of a fee to finance their portion of the
total cost of such facilities: and
WI�EREAS, development ���ithin the Cit�� contributes to the cumulative burden on
pedestrian facilities in direct relationship to the amount of population generated by the
de��elopment or the eross acreaee of ihe commercial or industrial land in the development; and
W'HEREAS; the goal of the Ota�� Ranch General De��elopment Plan (GDP) is to oreanize
land uses based upon a village concept to produce a cohesi��e, pedestrian friendly communin,
encourage non ��ehicular trips and foster interaction amongst residents: and
WHEREAS= a component of the Otay Ranch circulation svstem is a comprehensi��e trail
system to provide for non-��ehicular alternati��e modes of transportation; and
WHEREAS; the Otay Ranch GDP requires that a non-auto circulation s}�stem, such as
pedestrian walkw�a}�s. bike paths. and. N�here appropriate and feasible, erade separated arterial
crossinos be provided to encourage pedestrian acti��in� between villages; and
WIIEREAS, the City Council adopted the Otay Ranch Villaees One and Fi��e Pedestrian
Bridee Development Impact Fee (Impact Fee) b}� Ordinance 2767 (Ped DIF Bridee Ordinance)
in order to pay for pedestrian bridge facilities that will sen�e Ota� Ranch Villaees One and Five:
and
VGHEREAS, the City Council amended the original Ped Bridge DIF Ordinance 2767 on
Januan- 7. 2003, b�� Ordinance 2892; to include Otay Ranch Villaee Six to pay for its fair shaze
of bridge improvements as a condition of issuance of buildine permits; and
Ordinance No. 3360
Page No. 2
WHEREAS. the City Council amended the Ped Bridae DIF Ordinance 2892 on February
20, 2007, by Ordinance 3064; to indude Otay Ranch Village Two to pa}� for its fair share of
bridee improvements as a condition of issuance of building permits; and
WHEREAS, the Conditions or Approval for Otay Ranch Village Two tentative map
require that a funding mechanism be established to pay for one-half of Village Two's fair share
of bridge improvements; and
WHEREAS, pedestrian facilities, including a continuous village pathway and cart-path
system, that will directly connect Villages One, Pive, Six and Two, have been built, or are
proposed. Continuity of these pedestrian facilities requires crossing major streets. Rather than
street-level crossings, pedestrian bridges have been included as part of the pedestrian circulation
system. Such o��er-crossings encourage and facilitate the use of the pedestrian facilities and
reduce the danger to pedestrians; and
WHEREAS, the completion of the pedestrian bridges in Village Two wil] complete the
linkage of the pedestrian facilities in Villages One, Five, Six and Two, enhancing overall
pedestrian access in and among these villages; and
WHEREAS, the Village Two tentative map requires that the developer construct certain
pedestrian bridges that are part of this overall pedestrian circulation system; and
WHEREAS, the construction of these pedestrian bridges will be facilitated by including
their funding in the current Impact Fee program by: 1) amending the per unit fees payable at
issuance of a building permit; 2) revising the facilities to be financed by the Impact Fee; and 3)
revising the terrirory to which the Impact Fee is applicable to inclade Village Two; and
WHEREAS, the original Ped Bridge DIF Ordinance used the persons per dwelli�g unit
rates established in Section 17.10.040 of Chula Vista Municipal Code for the various residential
land use categories in deriving the Equivalence Dwelling Unit ratio upon which the [mpact Fee
is based; and
WHEREAS, the person per dwelling unit rates for Parkland Dedication in Sec. 17.10.040
were modified by Ordinance No. 2886. The rates for single family went from 3.22 persons per
unit to 3.52 persons per unit and the multiple-family rates went from 2.21 persons per dwelling
units to 2.61 persons per unit. The attached, cluster housing or planned unit development and the
duplex categories were deleted from Sec. 17.10.040; and
WHEREAS, Otay Ranch, Villages One, Five, Six and Two are those areas of land within
the City of Chula Vista surrounded by Telegraph Canyon Road, Otay Lakes Road, Heritage
Road, Olympic Parkway, La Media Road, Birch Road, and State Route 125. This area is shown
on the map marked Exhibit `2," which is included as an attachment to the City of Chula Vista
Pedestrian Bridoe Development Impact Fee Report for Otay Ranch Village Two, dated Februarv
13, 2007, on file in the Office of the City Engineer; and
Ordinance No. 3360
Pa¢e No. 3
V�'HEREAS: Cit� Eneineerine Staff has approved the Cin of Chula Vista Pedestrian
Bridge Development Impact Fee Report dated I�'o��ember 6. 1998; the updated Pedestrian Bridee
Development Impact Fee Report for Otay Ranch Village Sia dated December 17. 2002; the
updated Pedestrian Bridge De��elopment Impact Fee Repon for Village Two dated Februaq� 13.
2007 and updated Pedestrian Bridge De��elopment Impact Fee Report for Village Two dated
June 1�. ZO1� (Report): and
WlIEREAS, the Report, recommends pedestrian o��er-crossina facilities needed for
pedestrian access, and establishes a fee pa}�able by persons obtainine buildine permits for
developments ���ithin Ota�� Ranch Village Two benefitine from the construction of these
facilities: and
A'HEREAS; there are four Pedestrian O��er Crossinos (POC) proposed for the Otav
Ranch V"illases One. Five. Six and T��o: North La n4edia Bridee POC beh��een Villases One and
Five, South La Media Road POC bet��een Villages Sia and T���o. West Ol��mpic Pk��� Bridse
POC bet�eeen Villases One and TH�o. and East Olympic Park���a�� Bridge POC beh�-een Villaees
Five and Six: and �
WHEREAS, the Environmental Re��ie��� Coordinator has revie���ed the proposed activitv
for compliance ��ith the California En��ironmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that
the acti�ity is not a "Project" as defined under Section 1�378 of the State CEQA Guidelines;
therefore, pursuant to Section 1�060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines the activity is not
subject to CEQA; and
VJI-IEREAS, the City Council has determined that the amount of the Impact Fee le��ied by
this ordinance does not exceed the estimated cost of providing the public facilities identified b}�
the report.
NOV�'. THEREFORE. the Cirv Council of the Cih� of Chula Vista does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1. Em�ironmental Review
The Em�ironmental Re��ie�� Coordinator has reviewed the proposed activitv for
compliance �Rth the Califomia Environmental Qualirv Act (CEQA) and has determined that the
activin� is not a "Projecr` as defined under Section 1�378 of the State CEQA Guidelines;
therefore, pursuant to Section 1�060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines the activity is not
subject to CEQA.
SECTION 2. Acceptance of Reports
The Cit�� Council has re��ieH�ed the proposed Pedestrian Bridee De��elopment Impact Fee
Report; dated June 1�, 201�, and has accepted same, by Resolution No. 201�-288 in the form on
file in the Office oF the Cirv Clerk; the Cin� Council previousl�� revie���ed, accepted and adopted
Pedestrian Bridge Development Impact Fee Reports. dated November 6. 1998, December 17.
2002, and Februarv 13, 2007 (collectively, the Reports).
Ordinance No. 3360
Paee No. 4
SECTION 3. Facilities
The facilities to be financed by the Impact Fee are fully described in the Reports and
incorporated herein by this reference, (Facilities), all of which Facilities may be modified b�� the
City Council from time to time by resolution. The ]ocations at which the Facilities will be
constructed are shotim on Exhibit "1" of the approved 2002 and 2007 Reports. The City Council
may modify or amend the list of projects herein considered to be part of the Facilities by written
resolution in order to maintain compliance with the City's Capital Improvement Program or to
reflect changes in land development and estimated and actual pedestrian generation.
SECTION 4. Territory to �'hich Fee ]s Applicable
The area of the City of Chula Vista to which the Impact Fee herein established shall be
applicable is set forth on Exhibit "2" of the 2002 and 2007 Reports and is eenerally described
herein as the `Tenitory.'
SECTION 5. PUrpose
The purpose of this ordinance is to establish the Impact Fee in order to pro��ide the
necessary financing to construct the Facilities within the areas shown in Eahibit "1" of the
Report, in accordance with the City's General Plan.
SECTION 6. Establishment of Fee
The Impact Fee; to be based on a per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) basis, and payable
prior to the issuance of building permits for residential development projects within the
Territory; is hereby established to pay for the Facilities.
SEC'C10N 7. Due on Issuance of Building Permit
The Impact Fee shall be paid in cash upon the issuance of a residential building permit.
Early payment is not permitted. No building permit shal] be issued for residential development
projects subject to this ordinance unless the developer has paid the Impact Fee imposed by this
ordinance.
SECTION 8. Determination of Equivalent Dwelling Units
Residential land uses shall be converted to Equivalent Dwelling Units for the purpose of
this fee based on the following table:
Fee by Land Use
Land Use Peo le er household EDU's
Single Familv("SFD") 3.52 1
Multi Family ("MF") 2.61 0.74
Ordinance T'o. .i360
Paee I�'o. �
"Single famih��' shall mean a residential unit within a subdivision, plannin� azea or
neighborhood «�ith a net densih� of 8 uniis per acre or less as shown on the approved tentati��e
map for said subdivision. planning area or neighborhood.
"A4ulti-Famih�` shall mean a residential unit �vithin a subdi��ision. planning area or
neighborhood �ti�ith a net densit�• of greater than 8 units per acre or an�� residential unit ���ithin a
mixed-use project as shown on the appro��ed tentative map for said subdivision, planning area or
neiahborhood.
SECTION 9. Time to Determine Amount Due: Advance Pavment Prohibited
The Impact Fee for each de��elopment shall be calcu]ated at the time of buildine permit
issuance and shall be the amount as indicated at that time and not �vhen the tentative map or final
map ���as granted or applied for, or when the building permit plan check ���as conducted, or when
application ��as made for the building permit.
SEC7ION ]0. Purpose and Use of Fee
The purpose of the Impact Fee is to pa}� for the plannine. design. construction and/or
financing (including the cost of interest and other financing costs as appropriate) of the Facilities;
or reimbursement to the City or, at the discretion of the City if approved in ad��ance in ���riting, to
other third parties for advancine costs actually incurred for planning, designing, constructing; or
financing the Facilities. Any use of the Impact Fee shall recei��e the advance consent of the Cit��
Council and be used in a manner consistent with the purpose of the Impact Fee.
SECT[ON 11. Amount of Fee: Amendment to Master Fee Schedule
The initial Impact Fee shall be calculated at the rate of�8�4 per Sinele Family Dwelline
Unit (SFD) and $626 per n4ultiple Familv Dti�elline Unit (MF). Chapter XVI, Other Fees, of the
Master Fee Schedule. Section E. shall be amended to read as follo�+s:
E. Ota}� Ranch Villaees 1, �, 6 and 2 Pedestrian Bridge De��elopment Impact Fee.
This section is intended to memorialize the key provisions of Ordinance No. 2892; but
said ordinance go��erns over the pro��isions of the Master Fee Schedule. For example; in the
e��ent of a conflict in interpretation betN�een the D4aster Fee Schedule and the ordinance. or in the
e��ent that there are additional rules applicable to the imposition of the Impact Fee. the language
of the ordinance ao��ems.
a. Temtory to which Fee Applicable
The area of the City of Chula Vista to ��hich the Impact Fee herein established shall be
applicable is set forth in Exhibit "2" of the City of Chula Vista Pedestrian Bridge
De��elopment Impact Fee Report for Otav Ranch Villaee T�ti�o dated Februan� li, 2007,
and is generally described as the azea surrounded bv Teleeraph Can��on Road, Ota�� Lal:es
Road, Heritaee Road. Ohmpic Parkwav, La Media Road, Birch Road, and State Route
12�.
Ordinance No. 3u60
Pa�e No. 6
b. Rate per Residential Land Use and Fee
The Impact Fee shall be calculated at the rate of$844 per EDU and translated into a fee
per land use based on the people per household factor given belo��, which rate shall be
adjusted from time to time by the City Council.
Residential Land Use EDU's PDU's
Sinele Familv (SFD 1 $844
Multi Familv MF 0.74 $626
The amount of the Fee shall be adjusted, starting on October 1, 2016, and on each October
lst thereafier, based on the one-year change (from July to July) in the Los Angeles
Construction Cost Index (ENR-CCI) as published in the Engineering-News Record
Magazine. Adjustments to the above fees based on the ENR-CCI shall be automatic and
shall not require further action of the City Council. The reasons for which non-automatic
adjustments may be made include, but are not limited to the following: changes in the
type, size. location or cost of the facilities to be financed by the Impact Fee; changes in
land use in the City's General Plan; other sound engineering, financing and planning
information. Adjustments to the above Impact Fee may be made by resolution amending
Chapter 16 (Development and In-lieu Fees) of the City's Master Fee Schedule.
c. When Payable
The Impact Fee shal] be paid in cash not later than immediately prior to the issuance of a
building permit.
SECTIOI`' 12. Authority for Accounting and Eapenditures
The proceeds collected from the imposition of the Impact Fee shall be deposited into a
public facility financing fund (`Otay Ranch Villages 1, 5, 6 and 2 Pedestrian Bridge
Development Impact Fee Fund;' or alternatively, "Fund") which is hereby created and shall be
expended only for the purposes set forth in this ordinance, the Director of Finance is authorized
to establish various accounts ti�ithin the Fund for the Facilities identified in this ordinance and to
periodically make expenditures from the Fund for the purposes set forth herein in accordance
with the facilities phasing plan or capital improvement plan adopted by ihe City Council.
SECT[ON 13. Findings
The City Council hereby finds the following:
A. The establishment of the Impact Fee is necessary to protect the public safety and
�velfare and to ensure the effective implementation of the City's General Plan.
B. The Impact Fee is necessary to ensure that funds will be available for the
construction of the Facilities concurrent with the need for these Facilities and to
ensure certainty in the capital facilities budgeting for growth impacted public
facilities.
Ordinance I�io. 3360
Pase\'o. 7
C. The amount of the fee levied bv this ordinance does not exceed the estimated cost
of pro��idine the Facilities for ��hich the fee is collected.
D. NeN� development projects �aithin the temtom ��-i11 generate a si�nificant amount of
pedestrian traffic that current pedestrian facilities cannot service, therefore
construction of the Facilities ���ill be needed to sen ice new development projects.
E. That the leeislative findine and determination set forth in Ordinances 2767. 2892
and 306� continue to be true and correct.
SECTION 14. Impact Fee Additional to other Fees and Charees
7�he Impact Fee established b�� this section is in additio� to the requirements imposed by
other Cit�� laH-s, policies or reeulations relatins to the construction or the financing of the
construction of public improvements ���ithin subdivisions or developments.
SECTIO\ 1�. n4andator�� Construction of a Portion of the Facilities: Dutv to Tender
Reimbursement Offer
���henever a developer is required as a condition of appro��al of a development permit to
construct or cause the construction of the Facilities or a portion thereof; the City ma�� require the
developer to install the Facilities according to design specifications approved by the City and in
the size or capacit�� necessarv to accommodate estimated pedestrian traffic as indicated in the
Report and subsequent amendments. If such a requirement is imposed, the Cin� shall offer, at the
Citv's option, to reimburse the developer from the Fund either in cash or over time as Fees are
collected; or eive a credit against the Impact Fee le��ied by this ordinance or some combination
thereof, in the amount of the costs incurred b�� the developer that exceeds their contribution to
such Facilities as required b}� this ordinance, for the desisn and construction of the Facilin- not to
eaceed the estimated cost of that particulaz Facilin� as included in the calculation and updatine of
the Impact Fee. The Cit�� ma�� update the Impact Fee calculation, as City deems appropriate prior
to making such offer. This duri- to offer to give credit or reimbursement shall be independent of
the de��eloper's obligation to pa}� the Impact Fee.
SECTION 16. Voluntan� Construction of a Ponion of the Facilities: Dun� of Citv to Tender
Reimbursement Offer
If a developer is willing and aerees in N�itine to desien and construct a portion of the
Facilities in conjunction ��ith the prosecution of a development project within the Temtory. the
Citv ma��, as part of a wTitten aereement, reimburse the de��eloper from the Fund either in cash or
over time as Fees aze collected. or eive a credit aeainst the Impact Fee levied b�� this ordinance
or some combination thereof; in the amount of the costs incurred b}� the developer that eaceeds
their contribution to such Facilities as required by this ordinance, for the desien and construction
of the Facility not to e�ceed the estimated cost of that particular Facilin� as included in the
calculation and updatine of the Impact Fee and in an amount agreed to in ad��ance of their
expenditure in �a�riting b�� the Cin�. The Ciri- may updare the Impact Fee calculation, as Cih�
deems appropriate prior to making such offer. This duty to extend credits or offer reimbursement
shall be independent of the developers obligation to pay the Impact Fee.
I
Ordinance No. 3360
Page No. 8
SECTION 17. Procedure for Entitlement to Reimbursement Offer
The City's duty to extend a reimbursement offer to a developer pursuant to Section 15 or
16 above shall be conditioned on the developer complying with the terms and conditions of this
section:
a. Written authorization shal] be requested by the developer from the City and issued
by the City Council by written resolution before developer may incur any costs
eligible for reimbursement relating to the construction of the Facilities, excluding
any work attributable to a specific subdivision project.
b. The request for authorization shall contain the fo]lowing information, and the City
may from time to time request such other information as:
(1) Detailed descriptions of the work to be conducted by the developer with the
preliminary cost estimate.
c. If the Council grants autl�orization, it shall be by written agreement with the
Developer, and on the following conditions among such other conditions as the
Council may from time to time impose:
(1) Developer shall prepare all plans and specifications and submit same to the
City for approval;
(2) Developer shall secure and dedicate any right-of-way required for the
improvement work;
(3) Developer shall secure all required permits and environmental clearances
necessary for construction of the improvements;
(4) Developer shall provide performance bonds in a form and amount, and with a
surety satisfactory to the City;
(5) Developer shall pay all City fees and costs.
(6) The Cit}� shall be held harmless and indemnified, and upon demand by the
City; defended by the developer Tor any of the costs and liabilities associated
with the improvements.
(7) The de��eloper shall advance all necessary funds for the improvements;
including design and construction. The City will not be responsible for any of
the costs of constructing the facilities.
(8) The developer shall secure at least three (3) qualified bids for work to be
done. The construction contract shall be granted to the lowest qualified bidder.
Any daims for additional payment for extra work or charges during
construction shall be justified and shall be documented to the satisfaction of
the City Engineer.
Ordinance No. 3360
Pase I`'o. 9
(9) The de�eloper shall provide a detailed cost estimate, H�hich itemizes those
costs of the construction attributable to the impro��ements. Soils Eneineerine
shall be limited to 7S percent of the project cost, Civil Engineerin� shall be
limited to 7.� percent of the hard cost and landscape azchitecture shall be
limited to 2 percent of the landscaping cost. The estimate is preliminar}� and
subject to final determination bv the Cit�� Enaineer upon completion of the
Public Facilitv Project.
(10) 'Ihe agreement ma} pro��ide that upon determination of satisfacton�
incremental completion of the public facilitv project, as approved and certified
b�� the City Engineer, the Cih� ma}� pa�� the de��eloper progress payments in an
amount not to exceed 7� percent of the estimated cost of the construction
completed to the time of the proeress pa��ment but shall provide in such case
for the retention of 2� percent of such costs until issuance by the Cit}� of a
Notice of Completion.
(11) The agreement mav provide that any funds o���ed to the de��eloper as
reimbursements mav be applied to the de��eloper`s obligations to pay the
impact Fee for building permits to be applied for in the future.
(12) �tihen all ���ork has been completed to the satisfaction of the Cit��; the
de��eloper shall submit ��erification of payments made for the construction of
the project to tl�e Cin�. The Cin� Engineer shall make the final determination
on espenditures, Nfiich are eligible for reimbursement.
(li) Afrer final determination of expendirures eligible for reimbursement has been
made b}� the Public �'orks Director, the parties may agree to offset the
de��eloper's dutv to pa}� Impact Fees required by this ordinance against the
Cit��`s duty to reimburse the developer.
(14) After offset, if an�� funds are due the de��eloper under this section, the Citv
mav at its option, reimburse the de��eloper from the Fund either in cash or
over time as Fees aze collected, or �ive a credit aQainst the lmpact Fee levied
bv this ordinance or some combination thereof, in the amount of the costs
incurred b�� the developer that exceeds their required contribution to such
Facilities as required b}� this ordinance, for the design and construction of the
Facilit�� not to exceed the estimated cost of that particular Facilim as induded
in the calculation and updating of the Impact Fee and in an amount aereed to
in advance of[heir expenditure in �iriting b}� the Cit��.
(1�) A developer ma�� transfer a credit against the Impact Fee to another developer
��ith the ti�ritten approval of the Citv Engineer in his/her sole discretion.
Ordinance No. 3360
Page No. 10
SECTION 18. Procedure for Fee Modification
Anv developer who; because of the nature or type of uses proposed for a development
project. contends that application of the Impact Fee imposed by this ordinance is unconstitutional
or unrelated to mitigation of the burdens of the development, may apply to the City Council for a
waiver or modification of the Impact Fee or the manner in which it is calculated. The application
shall be made in writing and filed ��th tl�e City Clerk not later than ten days after notice is given
of the public hearing on the development permit application for the project, or if no development
permit is required; at the time of the filing of the building permit application. The application
shall state in detail the factual basis for the claim of waiver or modification, and shall provide an
engineering and accounting report showing the overall impact on the Development Impact Fees
(DIF) and the ability of the Ciry to complete construction of the Facilities by making the
modification requested by the applicant. The City Council shall make reasonable efforts to
consider the application ��ithin sixry days after its filing. The decision of the City Council shall
be finaL The procedure provided by this section is additional to any other procedure authorized
by law for protection or challenging the Impact Fee imposed by this ordinance.
SECTION 19. Fee Applicable to Public Agencies
De��elopment projects by public agencies, including schools, shall be exempt from the
provisions of the Impact Fee.
SECTION 20. Assessment District
If any assessment, community facilities district or special taxing district is established to
design, construct and pay for any or all of the Facilities ("Work Alternatively Financed"), the
owner or developer of a project may apply to the City Council for reimbursement from the Fund
or a credit in an amount equal to that portion of the cost included in the calculation of the Impact
Fee attributable to the Vdork Alternatively Financed. In this regard; the amount of the
reimbursement shall be based on the costs included in the Report, as amended from time to time,
and therefore, will not include any portion of the financing costs associated with the formation of
the assessment or other special taxing district.
SECTION 21. Expiration ofthis Ordinance
This ordinance shall be of no further force and effect wl�en the City Council determines
that the amount of Impact Fees which have been collected reaches an amount equal to the cost of
the Faciliries.
SECTION 22. Time Limit Por Judicial Action
Any judicial action or proceeding to attack, review, set aside, void or annul this ordinance
shall be brought within the time period as established by law. In accordance with Govemment
Code Section 66020(d)(1), the ninety-day approval period in which parties may protest begins
upon the effective date of this ordinance.
Ordinance No. 3360
Paee No. 11
SECTION 23. Other Not Pre�iouslv Defined Terms
For the purposes of this ordinance. the following words or phrases shall be construed as
defined in this Section, unless from the context it appears that a different meanine is intended.
(a) "Buildins Permit" means a permit required by and issued pursuant to the
Uniform Buildine Code as adopted by reference by this Citv.
(b) "De��eloper' means the o��mer or de��eloper of a de��elopment.
(c) "Development Permir' means an�� discretionarv permit. entitlement or
approval for a development project issued under any zoning or subdi��ision
ordinance of the Citv.
(d) "Development Projecr` or "Development" means an}� activity described in
Section 66000 of the State Go��emment Code.
(e) "Single Famil�� Attached D���ellin¢' means a sinele-familv dti�elling attached
to another sinele familv dwellina. ���ith each d���elline on its o��m lot.
SEC7�ION 24. Effective Date
This ordinance shal] become effective sist�� davs afrer its second readine and adoption.
resented by Approved as to form b}�
� • �� �
Kelly G. Brouehton, FASLA Glen R. G,oQins i \
Director of Development Sen�ices �tv amey �J
Ordinance No. 3360
Page No. 12
PASSED. APPROVED, and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista,
Califomia, this �th day of January 2016, by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers: Aguilar, Bensoussan, McCann, and Salas
NAYS: Councilmembers: None
ABSENT: Councilmembers: Miesen
Mary , las, Mayor
ATTEST:
/ �.�
Donna R. Norri , CMC, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO )
CITY OF CHULA VISTA )
I, Donna R. Norris, City Clerk of Chula Vista, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Ordinance No. .i360 had its first reading at a regular meeting held on the 12th day of December
201� and its second reading and adoption at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the
Sth day of January 2016; and was duly published in summary form in accordance with the
requirements of state laN� and the City Charter.
� q t(o ° '
Dated Donna R. Norris, MC, Ciry Clerk