HomeMy WebLinkAbout2016-01-26 Agenda Packet I declare under penalry of perjury that I am employed
by the Ciry of Chula Vis[a in the office of the Ciry Clerk
and thei I posted the document aceording to Brown Act
requirements.
'��s...n--�;�-.�,�;�,r�''�--• - Dated: � l(� Signed:
_..-_-_�-'" r �z�
�?;= _.ry�� � /
I����..Y�' �� � 'y� �� � .
�et.:g:�;_"�`"'t=--'+ .�,y3'�l�'
�--.-_ .
sa.�.:•
..-�A,��¢p-��"'� - _ ,-�-� CHUL4 VISTA
_ , rh.`"., .' .,:5 +::iW'6k O �
�
'C',i/!?%,!�
�
Mary Casillas Salas, Mayor
Patricia Aguilar, Counciimember Gary Halbert, City Manager
Pamela Bensoussan, Councilmember Glen R. Googins, City Attorney
John McCann, Councilmember ponna R. Norris, Ciry Clerk
Steve Miesen, Councilmember
Tuesday, January 26, 2016 5:00 PM Council Chambers
276 4th Avenue, Building A
Chula Vista, CA 91910
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL:
Councilmembers Aguilar, Bensoussan, McCann, Miesen and Mayor Salas
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG AND MOMENT OF SILENCE
SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY
A. 16-0020 OATHS OF OFFICE
Emma Abutin - Commission on Aging
Patricia Fernandez - International Friendship Commission .
Thomas Doyle - Parks & Recreation Commission
Growth Management Oversight Commission:
� Gloria Juarez, Southwest Seat
Rodney Caudiilo, Southeast Seat
� Duaine Hooker, Education Seat
Ciry o/Chula Ysta Page f Pdnietl on 1R1/2018
!" #&.0 '+,-./(B(.&(3!"46 "4<;6
O(.*5!,+*$(/!"(./+$%I
J& 0.1%!&* (/-
J **51H!8(/-
J; /$1% !;$ E
J"(%$/!? 0
J7 2 $1% !)1 1E
JB%$E 21*5!8 P1/
J8 // 5!4(5/#(/
J) $#!;1%- D(
JIODIA" +GDIN+C"QH -1*";"R"5S
34%) !"#)5"##)% ,!6)64%) (% 6) ,#% 0,')(6,77)'%! $$% 0,6" ()&1) %)$ 6" -)5"64 6)
0"(! ((" -) #%((),) !"#$%$&%'-),)$%$&%') 7)64%)8 &#"!-) ')(6,77)'%9 %(6()64,6), )"6%$)
&%)'%$ :%0)7 ')0"(! ((" ;))<7)1 )5"(4)6 )(8%,=) ) %) 7)64%(%)"6%$(-)8#%,(%)7"##) 6),)
>?%9 %(6)6 )28%,=@)7 '$)A,:,"#,&#%)" )64%)# &&1B), 0)( &$"6)"6)6 )64%) "61) #%'=)8'" ')6 )64%)
$%%6" +;))<6%$()8 ##%0)7' $)64%) (% 6) ,#% 0,')5"##)&%)0"(! ((%0)"$$%0",6%#1)7 ## 5" +)
64%) (% 6) ,#% 0,';
;P KLCMMTU,))9>Q,R!>@! A<S?B&!(P!4 /. !KN! /D!KT'!NMKL:
KLCMMTU
"(./+$%! FF (61!*51!0$/.*1#:
!5% ((!6 7'88 /0 %$'/9
V9A??B<!"> S<A",?A><&
4P KLCMMKL
KLCMMKL
,:R1**1 !(P! 1#$-/ *$(/!P (0!< /+ !&1D-H$+='!91#(. +1!
"(/#1 6 *$(/!"(00$##$(/
3: 10( /D.0!P (0!"(./+$%01021 !,-.$% ! 1W.1#*$/-! /!
1X+.#1D! 2#1/+1!P (0!*51!;1+1021 !U'!NMKY!"$* !"(./+$%!
011*$/-:
"(./+$%! ++1F*!*51! 1#$-/ *$(/! /D!1X+.#1!*51! 2#1/+1:
!5% ((!6 7'88 /0 %$'/9
TP KLCMMNN>9;A<,<"B!>@!?8B!"A?O!>@!"8SR,!QA&?,!
KLCMMNN
,))9>QA<7!?8B!?BRB79,)8!",<O><!;9,A<,7B!
"8,<<BR!S);,?B;!<BZS&!&?S;O!,<;!, B<;A<7!
>9;A<,<"B!<>:!N\[UT!,"">9;A<7RO!\\&B"><;!
9B,;A<7!,<;!,;>)?A><\]
).2%$+!V( =#!;1F *01/*
!: ; .%8 /%9
?51! +*$6$* !$#!/(*! !^) (_1+*`! #!D1P$/1D!./D1 !&1+*$(/!KY\[aU!(P!*51!
!</=$.'/8 /% +!>'%$7 9
" %$P( /$ !B/6$ (/01/* %!b. %$* !,+*!&* *1!7.$D1%$/1#c!*51 1P( 1'!
F. #. /*!*(!&* *1!7.$D1%$/1#!&1+*$(/!KYMLM\\+\]\\\[\]!/(!1/6$ (/01/* %!
16$1H!$#! 1W.$ 1D:
"(./+$%! D(F*!*51!( D$/ /+1:
!5% ((!6 7'88 /0 %$'/9
#$%&!'(!#)*+ !,$-% !2! .$/% 0!'/!"12"123"4
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 2
!" #&.0 '+,-./(B(.&(3!"46 "4<;6
7P KYCMLTL>9;A<,<"B!>@!?8B!"A?O!>@!"8SR,!QA&?,!, B<;A<7!
KYCMLTL
S<A"A),R!">;B!&B"?A><!NM:MT:YM!C!^3S&A<B&&!
9B&>S9"B!,<;!B<B97O!BQ,RS,?A><&'`!
&?9B, RA<A<7!3S&A<B&&B&d!9BbSA9B B<?&!@>9!
),9?A"A),?A><!A<!9B&>S9"B!,<;!B<B97O!
BQ,RS,?A><&!\\@A9&?!9B,;A<7\]
B+(/(0$+!;161%(F01/*!;1F *01/*
!: ; .%8 /%9
?51!) (_1+*!W. %$P$1#!P( ! !"% ##!U!" *1-( $+ %!BX10F*$(/!F. #. /*!*(!
!</=$.'/8 /% +!>'%$7 9
&1+*$(/!KY\[MU!,+*$(/#!2 !91-.% *( !,-1/+$1#!P( !) (*1+*$(/!(P!*51!
B/6$ (/01/*!(P!*51!" %$P( /$ !B/6$ (/01/* %!b. %$* !,+*!&* *1!
7.$D1%$/1#:
"(./+$%!F% +1!*51!( D$/ /+1!(/!P$ #*! 1 D$/-:
!5% ((!6 7'88 /0 %$'/9
9B&>RS?A><!>@!?8B!"A?O!">S<"AR!>@!?8B!"A?O!>@!
=P KYCMLaL
KYCMLaL
"8SR,!QA&?,!,))9>QA<7!?8B!,79BB B<?!3B?VBB<!
?8B!"A?O!>@!"8SR,!QA&?,!,<;!?8B!",RA@>9<A,!
)9>;S"?!&?BV,9;&8A)!">S<"AR!\\")&"\]!
B&?,3RA&8A<7!">RRB"?A><!R>",?A><&!@>9!
8>S&B8>R;!3,??B9AB&!,<;!><BC)>S<;!7,&!
"ORA<;B9&c!V,AQA<7!?8B!"> )B?A?AQB!3A;!
9BbSA9B B<?!,&!,RR>VB;!)B9!"Q "!N:YL:MaM3T!
,<;!N:YL:MeM:3:N!,<;!3:\[
B+(/(0$+!;161%(F01/*!;1F *01/*
!: ; .%8 /%9
?51!) (_1+*!W. %$P$1#!P( ! !"% ##!K!" *1-( $+ %!BX10F*$(/!F. #. /*!*(!
!</=$.'/8 /% +!>'%$7 9
&1+*$(/!KY\[MK!\\BX$#*$/-!@ +$%$*$1#\]!(P!*51!" %$P( /$ !B/6$ (/01/* %!
b. %$* !,+*!&* *1!7.$D1%$/1#:
"(./+$%! D(F*!*51! 1#(%.*$(/:
!5% ((!6 7'88 /0 %$'/9
9B&>RS?A><!>@!?8B!"A?O!">S<"AR!>@!?8B!"A?O!>@!
6P KYCMLUU
KYCMLUU
"8SR,!QA&?,!,))9>QA<7!,<!,79BB B<?!A<!?8B!
, >S<?!>@!fKYM'MMM!3B?VBB<!?8B!"A?O!>@!"8SR,!
QA&?,!,<;!?8B!"B<?B9!@>9!&S&?,A<,3RB!B<B97O!
\\"&B\]!@>9!&S))>9?!A<!A )RB B<?A<7!?8B!"A?O!>@!
"8SR,!QA&?,d&!&S&?,A<,3RB!"> S<A?AB&!
)9>79,
;161%(F01/*!&1 6$+1#!;1F *01/*
!: ; .%8 /%9
?51! +*$6$* !$#!/(*! !^) (_1+*`! #!D1P$/1D!./D1 !&1+*$(/!KY\[aU!(P!*51!
!</=$.'/8 /% +!>'%$7 9
" %$P( /$ !B/6$ (/01/* %!b. %$* !,+*!&* *1!7.$D1%$/1#c!*51 1P( 1'!
F. #. /*!*(!&* *1!7.$D1%$/1#!&1+*$(/!KYMLM\\+\]\\\[\]!/(!1/6$ (/01/* %!
16$1H!$#! 1W.$ 1D:
"(./+$%! D(F*!*51! 1#(%.*$(/:
!5% ((!6 7'88 /0 %$'/9
#$%&!'(!#)*+ !,$-% !?! .$/% 0!'/!"12"123"4
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 3
!" #&.0 '+,-./(B(.&(3!"46 "4<;6
5P KLCMMMa9B&>RS?A><!>@!?8B!"A?O!">S<"AR!>@!?8B!"A?O!>@!
KLCMMMa
"8SR,!QA&?,!, B<;A<7!?8B!@A&",R!OB,9!NMKYgNMKL!
>?8B9!79,<?&!@S<;!3S;7B?!3O!,))9>)9A,?A<7!
f\[T'NeM!?>!,""B)?!,!79,<?!@9> !9>O!,<;! ,9A,<!
8>RRB ,<!@>S<;,?A><!\\TgY!Q>?B!9BbSA9B;\]
,/$0 %!" 1!@ +$%$*
!: ; .%8 /%9
?51! +*$6$* !$#!/(*! !^) (_1+*`! #!D1P$/1D!./D1 !&1+*$(/!KY\[aU!(P!*51!
!</=$.'/8 /% +!>'%$7 9
" %$P( /$ !B/6$ (/01/* %!b. %$* !,+*!&* *1!7.$D1%$/1#c!*51 1P( 1'!
F. #. /*!*(!&* *1!7.$D1%$/1#!&1+*$(/!KYMLM\\+\]\\\[\]!/(!1/6$ (/01/* %!
16$1H!$#! 1W.$ 1D:
"(./+$%! D(F*!*51! 1#(%.*$(/:
!5% ((!6 7'88 /0 %$'/9
HAD@O"CD@J)DN"KCJ@"ALD" JIODIA" +GDIN+C
?F9GH " J@@DIAO
C%'( ()(8%,=" +)0 '" +)C &#"!) $$% 6()$,1),00'%(()64%) !"#) ), 1)( &D%!6)$,66%')
5"64" )64%) !"#E()D '"(0"!6" )64,6)"() 6)#"(6%0),(), )"6%$) )64%),+% 0,;))26,6%)#,5)
+% %',##1)8' 4"&"6()64%) !"#)7' $)0"(! ((" +) ')6,=" +),!6" ) ), 1)"(( %) 6)" !# 0%0)
)64%),+% 0,-)& 6-)"7),88' 8'",6%-)64%) !"#)$,1)(!4%0 #%)64%)6 8"!)7 ')7 6 '%)0"(! ((" )
')'%7%')64%)$,66%')6 )(6,77;)) $$% 6(),'%)#"$"6%0)6 )64'%%)$" 6%(;
?F9GH "LD+CHIEO
34%)7 ## 5" +)"6%$A(B)4,:%)&%% ),0:%'6"(%0),()8 &#"!)4%,'" +A(B),()'%9 "'%0)&1)#,5;))<7)1 )
5"(4)6 )(8%,=) ), 1)"6%$-)8#%,(%)7"##) 6),)>?%9 %(6)6 )28%,=@)7 '$)A,:,"#,&#%)" )64%)# &&1B)
, 0)( &$"6)"6)6 )64%) "61) #%'=)8'" ')6 )64%)$%%6" +;
UP KLCMMMY"><&A;B9,?A><!>@!, B<;A<7!"8,)?B9!Ke:MN!>@!
KLCMMMY
?8B!"8SR,!QA&?,! S<A"A),R!">;B!?>!,@@A9 !
)B9 A&&AQB!h><A<7!,<;!"R,9A@O!)9>8A3A?B;!S&B&
,:!B B97B<"O!>9;A<,<"B!>@!?8B!"A?O!>@!"8SR,!
QA&?,!, B<;A<7!"8,)?B9!Ke:MN!>@!?8B!"8SR,!QA&?,!
S<A"A),R!">;B!?>!,@@A9 !)B9 A&&AQB!h><A<7!
)9A<"A)RB&!,<;!?>!"R,9A@O!?8,?!S&B&!)9>8A3A?B;!
BR&BV8B9B!A<!?8B! S<A"A),R!">;B!,9B!,R&>!
)9>8A3A?B;!R,<;!S&B&!\\TgY!Q>?B!9BbSA9B;\]
3:!>9;A<,<"B!>@!?8B!"A?O!>@!"8SR,!QA&?,!
, B<;A<7!"8,)?B9!Ke:MN!>@!?8B!"8SR,!QA&?,!
S<A"A),R!">;B!?>!,@@A9 !)B9 A&&AQB!h><A<7!
)9A<"A)RB&!,<;!?>!"R,9A@O!?8,?!S&B&!)9>8A3A?B;!
BR&BV8B9B!A<!?8B! S<A"A),R!">;B!,9B!,R&>!
)9>8A3A?B;!R,<;!S&B&!\\@A9&?!9B,;A<7\]
#$%&!'(!#)*+ !,$-% !@! .$/% 0!'/!"12"123"4
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 4
!" #&.0 '+,-./(B(.&(3!"46 "4<;6
"$* !,**( /1
!: ; .%8 /%9
?51! +*$6$* !$#!/(*! !^) (_1+*`! #!D1P$/1D!./D1 !&1+*$(/!KY\[aU!(P!*51!
!</=$.'/8 /% +!>'%$7 9
" %$P( /$ !B/6$ (/01/* %!b. %$* !,+*!&* *1!7.$D1%$/1#c!*51 1P( 1'!
F. #. /*!*(!&* *1!7.$D1%$/1#!&1+*$(/!KYMLM\\+\]\\\[\]!/(!1/6$ (/01/* %!
16$1H!$#! 1W.$ 1D:!<(*H$*5#* /D$/-!*51!P( 1-($/-'!*51! +*$6$* !
W. %$P$1#!P( ! /!BX10F*$(/!F. #. /*!*(!&1+*$(/!KYMLK\\2\]\\\[\]!(P!*51!
" %$P( /$ !B/6$ (/01/* %!b. %$* !,+*!&* *1!7.$D1%$/1#:
"(./+$%!+(/D.+*!*51!F.2%$+!51 $/-'! D(F*!101 -1/+ !( D$/ /+1!\\,\]'!
!5% ((!6 7'88 /0 %$'/9
/D!F% +1!( D$/ /+1!\\3\]!(/!P$ #*! 1 D$/-:
+ AHJI"HAD@O
34%)<6%$A(B)#"(6%0)" )64"()(%!6" ) 7)64%),+% 0,)5"##)&%)! ("0%'%0)" 0":"0 ,##1)&1)64%)
!"#), 0),'%)%F8%!6%0)6 )%#"!"6)0"(! ((" ), 0)0%#"&%',6" ;))<7)1 )5"(4)6 )(8%,=) ), 1)
"6%$-)8#%,(%)7"##) 6),)>?%9 %(6)6 )28%,=@)7 '$)A,:,"#,&#%)" )64%)# &&1B), 0)( &$"6)"6)6 )64%)
"61) #%'=)8'" ')6 )64%)$%%6" +;
)9B&B<?,?A><!><!?8B!@A9&?!)8,&B!>@!,!
:P KLCMM\[T
KLCMM\[T
SR?AC)8,&B!)9>"B&&!?>!,??9,"?!,<!
A<&?A?S?A><,R!),9?<B9!,<;!@S<;A<7!&>S9"B!?>!
;BQBR>)!?8B!S<AQB9&A?O!,<;!A<<>Q,?A><!;A&?9A"?
B+(/(0$+!;161%(F01/*!;1F *01/*
!: ; .%8 /%9
?51! +*$6$* !$#!/(*! !^) (_1+*`! #!D1P$/1D!./D1 !&1+*$(/!KY\[aU!(P!*51!
!</=$.'/8 /% +!>'%$7 9
" %$P( /$ !B/6$ (/01/* %!b. %$* !,+*!&* *1!7.$D1%$/1#c!*51 1P( 1'!
F. #. /*!*(!&* *1!7.$D1%$/1#!&1+*$(/!KYMLM\\+\]\\\[\]!/(!1/6$ (/01/* %!
16$1H!$#! 1W.$ 1D:
"(./+$%! ++1F*!*51! 1F( *:
!5% ((!6 7'88 /0 %$'/9
HAM"@+I+EDCVO"CD?JCAO
@+MJCVO"CD?JCAO
) 1#1/* *$(/!(P!*51!">)NKI!,D6(+ *$/-!P( !"%$0 *1!"5 /-1!
;<P KLCMM\[U
KLCMM\[U
,+*$(/
JFI HG@D@9DCOV" J@@DIAO
+NBJFCI@DIA
6 )64%)?%+ #,') "61) !"#)/%%6" +) )G%&' ,'1)H-)HIJK-),6)LMII)8;$;-)" )64%) !"#)
4,$&%'(;
#$%&!'(!#)*+ !,$-% !A! .$/% 0!'/!"12"123"4
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 5
!" #&.0 '+,-./(B(.&(3!"46 "4<;6
/,6%'",#()8' :"0%0)6 )64%) "61) !"#)'%#,6%0)6 ), 1) 8% N(%((" )"6%$) )64"(),+% 0,),'%),:,"#,&#%)
7 ')8 &#"!)'%:"%5),6)64%) "61) #%'=E()O77"!%-)# !,6%0)" ) "61)P,##),6)HQK)G '64)*:% %-). "#0" +)*-)
0 '" +) '$,#)& (" %(()4 '(;
< )! $8#", !%)5"64)64%
*/R?< *S2)T<3P)U<2*.<V<3<R2)* 3
34%) "61) 7) 4 #,)W"(6,)'%9 %(6()" 0":"0 ,#()54 )'%9 "'%)(8%!",#),!! $$ 0,6" ()6 ),!!%((-),66% 0-)
, 0X ')8,'6"!"8,6%)" ),) "61)$%%6" +-),!6":"61-) ')(%':"!%-)! 6,!6)64%) "61) #%'=E()O77"!%),6)AKJYB)
KYJNLIZJA ,#"7 ' ",)?%#,1)2%':"!%)"(),:,"#,&#%)7 ')64%)4%,'" +)"$8,"'%0)&1)0",#" +)QJJB),6)#%,(6)
7 '61N%"+46)4 '()" ),0:, !%) 7)64%)$%%6" +;
/ (6) 4 #,)W"(6,) "61) !"#)$%%6" +(-)" !# 0" +)8 &#"!)! $$% 6(-),'%):"0% )'%! '0%0), 0),"'%0)#":%)
)*3\[3)\\N:%'(%)!4, %#)YY)A64' +4 6)64%) 61B-) ) F) ,&#%)!4, %#)HZ)A #1)" ) 4 #,)W"(6,B-)
, 0) #" %),6)555;!4 #,:"(6,!,;+ :;)?%! '0%0)$%%6" +(),'%),#( ),"'%0) )T%0 %(0,1(),6)Q)8;$;)
A& 64)!4, %#(B), 0),'%),'!4":%0) )64%) "61\]()5%&("6%;
2"+ ) 8),6)555;!4 #,:"(6,!,;+ :)6 )'%!%":%)%$,"#) 6"7"!,6" ()54% ) "61) !"#),+% 0,(),'%)
8 &#"(4%0) #" %;
#$%&!'(!#)*+ !,$-% !4! .$/% 0!'/!"12"123"4
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 6
City of Chula Vista
Staff Report
File#:16-0020, Item#: A.
OATHS OF OFFICE
Emma Abutin - Commission on Aging
Patricia Fernandez - International Friendship Commission
Thomas Doyle - Parks & Recreation Commission
Growth Management Oversight Commission:
Gloria Juarez, Southwest Seat
Rodney Caudillo, Southeast Seat
Duaine Hooker, Education Seat
Youth Action Council:
Samuel Strong
Matthew Hong
Daniela Diaz
Colin Tam
Gabriela Perez
Elizabeth Hafen
Hannah Johnson
Paris Delgado
City of Chula VistaPage 1 of 1Printed on 1/21/2016
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 7
City of Chula Vista
Staff Report
File#:16-0048, Item#: 1.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES of January 12 and 14, 2016.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Council approve the minutes.
City of Chula VistaPage 1 of 1Printed on 1/21/2016
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 8
!"#$" %&'(") * (
+,, -."+ -& ,*"/"01($
C&,*@(! "D(-&(1!"B9 "94B;2344"5+
#&-6 '" %(78,1*
9:;"< %"=>,-&, "?& '@ -."=
%&'(") * ( " ="ABAB4
EFGHI=E"+FFCJKG"LM"CNF" JCO" LHK JI
=II"CL"LE0FE
!"#$% & '()! *+ ', -('. -*")/(# *+ ', -('. *+ -,"#$ 0(1'$ 2$1 /$## 3 '* *%3 % $' 4567 89:9 () ',
-*")/(# -,$:; %1< #*/$' 3 () -('. =$##< >7? @*"%', A )" < -,"#$ 0(1'$< -$#(+*%)($9
ELII" =II3
!"#$%$&%'()* "#+',(-%. /0(1+0 '(2% 3 33+ ,( !"#$%$&%'(1! + ,(
51,*,- 3
!"#$%$&%'(1"%3% (+ 4(1+0 '( +3"##+3(5+#+3
#1* B% 1 )'5 -('. &$)$! % =$#; %'< -('. ''*%) . C**!()1< -('. -# %D E*%%(1< $)3 11(1'$)' -('. -# %D
F(! #*2
5IF0GF"LM"=IIFGJ=K F"CL"CNF"MI=G"=K0"+L+FKC"LM"PJIFK F
-*")/(#: :; % &( 1 ) # 3 ', B# 3! *+ ## !($)/ 9
P5F J=I"LE0FEP"LM"CNF"0=O
6789:7;
<=>5>?@)@AB?(BC()D)=-5(@B(@E>(F967(5@)=GAHE@(<)=)->(
=Q
DA??>=5
-*")/(#: :; %1 !"(#$% $)3 &/-$)) !$A $ 8% 1 )'$'(*) *) ', >6G4 H'$%#(!,' B$%$3 $)3 8% 1 )' 3
$2$%31 '* ', 8$%$3 )'%. 2()) %19
6:89966
<=>5>?@)@AB?(2I( )=BGA?)(AGA ,(5>?AB=(=>HAB?)G(<G)??>=,(
?Q
5)?(-A>HB()55B A)@AB?(BC(HBJ>=?1>?@5(K5)?-)HL(B?(
?>M@(5@><5(CB=(5)?(-A>HB(CB=D)=-N(@E>(=>HAB?)G(<G)?(
)?-()(<B@>?@A)G(CO?-A?H(1>)5O=>
-*# ) -# : )'1*)< B%()/(8$# B#$)) %< % 8% 1 )'()! H EI C 8% 1 )' 3 ()+*%:$'(*) *) H$) I( !*
@*%2$%35 J, !(*)$# B#$) $)3 $ 8*' )'($# +")3()! : $1"% 9
LKPFKC" =IFK0=E"RJ ,7*"B"/";S
-('. ''*%) . C**!()1 1'$' 3 $ % A(1 3 % 1*#"'(*) +*% K' : > ,$3 ; ) 3(1'%(;"' 3 '* ', -*")/(#9
6:89969)<<=BJ)G(BC(1A?O@>5( P(Q+ +'0(7,(F96:R
BQ
E,6#77,-@,@"=6 #-3" #&-6 '"(TT1#>," %,"7 -& ,*Q
#$%&!'(!#)*+ !,$-% !"
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 9
!" #&-6 '+,, -."+ -& ,*"/"01($ D(-&(1!"B9 "94B;
6789766
=>5BGO@AB?(?BR(F96:899;(BC(@E>( A@I( BO? AG(BC(@E>( A@I(
9Q
BC( EOG)(JA5@)()<<=BJA?H(@E>(S A@I(BC( EOG)(JA5@)(21<(
1)?O)G,(-> >12>=(F967T()?-()O@EB=AUA?H(@E>( A@I(
>?HA?>>=(@B()<<=BJ>(CO@O=>(O<-)@>5(B?(2>E)GC(BC(@E>(
A@I
E,6#77,-@,@"=6 #-3" #&-6 '"(@#T " %,"1,*#'& #-Q
67897F6B=-A?)? >(BC(@E>( A@I( BO? AG(BC(@E>( A@I(BC( EOG)(
UQ
JA5@)()<<=BJA?H(@E>(@>G>H=)<E( )?IB?(-=)A?)H>(
E)??>G(O<-)@>-(?>MO5(5@O-I()?-()1>?-A?H(B=-A?)? >(
?BR(F;VW() B=-A?HGI(KCA=5@(=>)-A?HL
E,6#77,-@,@"=6 #-3" #&-6 '"T'(6," %,"#1@ -(-6,"#-"$ 1* "1,(@ -.Q
6789:FV)R) ><@)? >(BC()O-A@>-(CA?)? A)G(5@)@>1>?@5(CB=(
<Q
CA5 )G(I>)=(>?->-(QO?>(;9,(F967
2R=>5BGO@AB?(?BR(F96:899W(BC(@E>( A@I( BO? AG(BC(@E>(
A@I(BC( EOG)(JA5@)(1)XA?H(J)=ABO5()1>?-1>?@5(@B(@E>(
CA5 )G(I>)=(F96WY67(2O-H>@(@B()-QO5@(CB=(J)=A)? >5()?-(
)<<=B<=A)@A?H(CO?-5(@E>=>CB=(KWY7(JB@>(=>ZOA=>-L
E,6#77,-@,@"=6 #-3" #&-6 '"(66,T " %,"1,T#1 "(-@"(@#T " %,"1,*#'& #-Q
6789:\[6)R=>5BGO@AB?(?BR(F96:8997(BC(@E>( A@I( BO? AG(BC(@E>(
2Q
A@I(BC( EOG)(JA5@)( )GGA?H()(H>?>=)G(1O?A A<)G(
>G> @AB?(@B(2>(E>G-(B?(@O>5-)I,(QO?>(\[,(F96:,(CB=(@E>(
>G> @AB?(BC(@DB(1>12>=5(BC(@E>( A@I( BO? AG,(
=><=>5>?@A?H(-A5@=A @5(;()?-(W\\( B?5BGA-)@A?H(@E>(
>G> @AB?(DA@E(@E>(5@)@>DA->(>G> @AB?\\()?-(=>ZO>5@A?H(
@E>( BO?@I(BC(5)?(-A>HB(2B)=-(BC(5O<>=JA5B=5(@B(
<>=1A@(@E>(=>HA5@=)=(BC(JB@>=5(@B(<>=CB=1( >=@)A?(
5>=JA >5(CB=(@E>( B?-O @(BC(@E>(>G> @AB?
2R=>5BGO@AB?(?BR(F96:899:(BC(@E>( A@I( BO? AG(BC(@E>(
A@I(BC( EOG)(JA5@)()-B<@A?H(=>HOG)@AB?5(CB=(
)?-A-)@>5(CB=(>G> @AJ>(BCCA >(<>=@)A?A?H(@B(1)@>=A)G5(
5O21A@@>-(@B(@E>(>G> @B=)@>()@(@E>(H>?>=)G(1O?A A<)G(
>G> @AB?(@B(2>(E>G-(@O>5-)I,(QO?>(\[,(F96:
E,6#77,-@,@"=6 #-3" #&-6 '"(@#T " %,"1,*#'& #-*Q
#$%&!'(!#)*+ !,$-% !.
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 10
!" #&-6 '+,, -."+ -& ,*"/"01($ D(-&(1!"B9 "94B;
6789:V:
=>5BGO@AB?(?BR(F96:899\[(BC(@E>( A@I( BO? AG(BC(@E>( A@I(
;Q
BC( EOG)(JA5@)()<<=BJA?H(<)=@A A<)@AB?(A?(@E>(5)?(-A>HB(
BO?@I(C)A=(F96:(5@=>>@(2)??>=(<=BH=)1(@B(<G) >(C)A=(
<=B1B@AB?)G(2)??>=5(A?(@E>( A@I(BC( EOG)(JA5@)(
C>)@O=A?H( A@I(GBHB()?-(5)?(-A>HB( BO?@I(C)A=()?-(
<=>5>?@A?H(5<B?5B=(GBHB5
E,6#77,-@,@"=6 #-3" #&-6 '"(@#T " %,"1,*#'& #-Q
)..' \]+#( P(/^%( 3% /( +#% 4+'
= CJLK3="7# #-"V(*"7(@,"8!" #&-6 '7,78,1"+6 (-- "*,6#-@,@"8!" #&-6 '7,78,1"
+ ,*,- " #"(TT1#>,"* ($$W*"1,6#77,-@( #-*"#-" %,"(8#>," #-*,- " (',-@(1"
,7* "%,(@ -.*"1,(@ " ,X "V( >,@Q"C%,"7# #-"6(11 ,@"8!" %,"$#''#V -."># ,3
7(8()* "#+',(2% 3 33+ ,(1! + ,(1"%3% (+ 4( +3"##+3(5+#+3
O,*3
9(((
K#3
9(((
=8* ( -3
JCF+P"EF+L)F0"MEL+"CNF" LKPFKC" =IFK0=E
J, % 2 % )*) 9
5H?IJ " L++FKCP
F(## L(##($:1< -,"#$ 0(1'$ % 1(3 )'< M8% 11 3 /*)/ %) % !$%3()! 1 (N 3 8%*8 %'. $)3 , 1";:('' 3
2%('' ) 3*/": )'$'(*)9
= CJLK"JCF+P
6789:;\[ A@I()@@B=?>I(=><B=@(B?( A@I( BO? AG(@>=1(GA1A@5()?-(
:Q
A@I( BO? AG(-A=> @AB?(@B(5@)CC(=>H)=-A?H(5)1>(
K /" %4(P' $(? \]%$&%'(6\[,(F967L
-('. ''*%) . C**!()1 $)3 11(1'$)' -('. ''*%) . &$#$)3 !$A $ 8% 1 )'$'(*) *) ', (' :9
-('. ''*%) . C**!()1 1'$' 3 , 2*"#3 3(1/"11 2(', ', -,$%' % A( 2 -*::(11(*) $) $88$% )'
3(1/% 8$)/. ; '2 ) ', -,$%' % $)3 ', &")(/(8$# -*3 % !$%3()! ', # )!', *+ '(: $) ()3(A(3"$#
2*"#3 % +%$() +%*: 1 D()! # /'(*) $+' % 1 %A()! '2* ' %:19
6789:7F B?5A->=)@AB?(BC(<B55A2G>()<<BA?@1>?@(@B(CAGG(B?>(
YQ
=>1)A?A?H(J) )? I(B?(@E>(<)=X5(_(=> =>)@AB?(
B11A55AB?(C=B1(@E>(GA5@(BC(CA?)GA5@5(DEB(D>=>(
A?@>=JA>D>-(B?(?BJ>12>=(6\[,(F967
) (" 4"\]"4 +#(`^ (`+3(+.. " /%4(/ (/^%(<+'a3(+ 4(=%!'%+/" (
$$"33" (+/(/^%($%%/" *( P(? \]%$&%'(6\[,(F967(^+3(4%!#" %4(/^%(
+.. " /$% /,(#%+\]" *( %('%$+" " *(\]+!+ !0R(@^%(P ## `" *(" 4"\]"4 +#3(
'%!%"\]%4(/` ( '($ '%( $" +/" 3(/ (&%(" /%'\]"%`%4( (? \]%$&%'(69,(
F967,(`%'%(3 &3%b % /#0(" /%'\]"%`%4( (? \]%$&%'(6\[,(F967,(+ 4($+0(
&%(+.. " /%4(/ (P"##(/^%('%$+" " *(\]+!+ !0N()#"!%( ^+"3 *a'+$,(@^ $+3(
- 0#%,(G" 4+(?+\]+'' ,(@^ $(?%^'" *,(-+\]"4(B#"\]%'+,(G%3#"%(<^+$,(+ 4(
Q ^ (U+'%$R
#$%&!'(!#)*+ !,$-% !/
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 11
!" #&-6 '+,, -."+ -& ,*"/"01($ D(-&(1!"B9 "94B;
J, % 2$1 /*)1 )1"1 *+ ', -*")/(# '* +*% !* $) $33('(*)$# %*")3 *+ ()' %A( 21 $)3 '* $88*()' ',
%")) % "8 +%*: ', E*A :; % G7< >6G4 ()' %A( 21< J,*:$1 I*.# 9
= CJLK3="7# #-"V(*"7(@,"8!"0,T& !"+(!#1"?,-*#&**(- "*,6#-@,@"8!" #&-6 '7,78,1"
+6 (-- " %( "C%#7(*"0#!',"8,"(TT# - ,@" #" %,"5(1Z*"\["E,61,( #-"
#77 ** #-Q"C%,"7# #-"6(11 ,@"8!" %,"$#''#V -."># ,3
7(8()* "#+',(2% 3 33+ ,(1! + ,(1"%3% (+ 4( +3"##+3(5+#+3
O,*3
9(((
K#3
9(((
=8* ( -3
JCO"+=K=GFE\\P"EF5LECP
-('. &$)$! % =$#; %' $))*")/ 3 ', % / )' /*::")('. +*%": *) ', '*8(/ *+ O# E()* 8% 8$%$'(*)19
+=OLE\\P"EF5LECP
6:8999:)R=)@ACA )@AB?(BC()<<BA?@1>?@5(@B(@E>(CBGGBDA?H(
AQ
B11A55AB?5N
8>$$+()& /" ,( $$"33" ( ()*" *(
8<+/'"!"+(C%' + 4%c,(A /%' +/" +#(C'"% 43^".( $$"33"
2R=)@ACA )@AB?(BC()<<BA?@1>?@(BC(@E>(CBGGBDA?H(
5@O->?@5(@B(@E>(IBO@E() @AB?( BO? AGN
85+$ %#(5/' *
81+//^%`(E *
8-+ "%#+(-"+c
8 #" (@+$
8H+&'"%#+(<%'%c
8>#"c+&%/^(E+P%
8E+ +^(Q ^ 3
8<+'"3(-%#*+4
= CJLK3="7# #-"V(*"7(@,"8!" #&-6 '7,78,1"+6 (-- "*,6#-@,@"8!" #&-6 '7,78,1"
=.& '(1 " %( " %,"$#''#V -."(TT# - 7,- *"8,"1( $ ,@3"F77("=8& -" #" %,"
#77 ** #-"#-"=. -."(-@"5( 1 6 ("M,1-(-@,\]" #" %,"J- ,1-( #-('"M1 ,-@*% T"
#77 ** #-Q"C%,"7# #-"6(11 ,@"8!" %,"$#''#V -."># ,3
7(8()* "#+',(2% 3 33+ ,(1! + ,(1"%3% (+ 4( +3"##+3(5+#+3
O,*3
9(((
K#3
9(((
=8* ( -3
= CJLK3="7# #-"V(*"7(@,"8!" #&-6 '7,78,1"+6 (-- "*,6#-@,@"8!" #&-6 '7,78,1"
=.& '(1 " %( " %,"$#''#V -."(TT# - 7,- *" #" %,"O#& %"=6 #-" #&-6 '"8,"1( $ ,@3"
P(7&,'"P 1#-. "+( %,V"N#-. "0(- ,'("0 (\] " #' -"C(7 "G(81 ,'("5,1,\] "F' \](8, %"
N($,- "N(--(%"D#%-*#- "(-@"5(1 *"0,'.(@#Q"C%,"7# #-"6(11 ,@"8!" %,"$#''#V -."
># ,3
7(8()* "#+',(2% 3 33+ ,(1! + ,(1"%3% (+ 4( +3"##+3(5+#+3
O,*3
9(((
K#3
9(((
=8* ( -3
#$%&!'(!#)*+ !,$-% !0
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 12
!" #&-6 '+,, -."+ -& ,*"/"01($ D(-&(1!"B9 "94B;
6:8999F)<<BA?@1>?@(BC(-><O@I(1)IB=
B4Q
= CJLK3="7# #-"V(*"7(@,"8!"+(!#1" (* ''(*"P('(* "*,6#-@,@"8!" #&-6 '7,78,1"
+6 (-- " %( " #&-6 '7,78,1"+ ,*,-"8,"(TT# - ,@"0,T& !"+(!#1Q"C%,"7# #-"
6(11 ,@"8!" %,"$#''#V -."># ,3
7(8()* "#+',(2% 3 33+ ,(1! + ,(1"%3% (+ 4( +3"##+3(5+#+3
O,*3
9(((
K#3
9(((
=8* ( -3
6:89996)<<BA?@1>?@(BC( A@I( BO? AG1>12>=5(@B(BO@5A->(
BBQ
)H>? A>5N
d ^ #+(J"3/+(J%/%'+ 3(E $%(5 .. '/(C 4+/" (8(1%$&%'(
d ^ #+(J"3/+(J%/%'+ 3(E $%(5 .. '/(C 4+/" (8(()#/%' +/%
dA /%' +/" +#( !"#(P '(G !+#(> \]"' $% /+#(A "/"+/"\]%3(KA G>AL(8(
> \]"' $% /+#(G%+4
dA /%' +/" +#( !"#(P '(G !+#(> \]"' $% /+#(A "/"+/"\]%3(KA G>AL(8(
)#/%' +/%
dG%+* %( P( +#"P ' "+( "/"%3,(5+ (-"%* (-"\]"3" (8(1%$&%'
dG%+* %( P( +#"P ' "+( "/"%3,(5+ (-"%* (-"\]"3" (8()#/%' +/%
d1%/' . #"/+ (@'+ 3"/(503/%$(2 +'4( P(-"'%!/ '3(K1@5L(8(1%$&%'
d1%/' . #"/+ (@'+ 3"/(503/%$(2 +'4( P(-"'%!/ '3(K1@5L(8()#/%' +/%
d1%/' . #"/+ (D+3/%`+/%'( $$"33" (K1%/' L(8(1%$&%'(
d1%/' . #"/+ (D+3/%`+/%'( $$"33" (K1%/' L(8()#/%' +/%
dB/+0(J+##%0(=%*" +#(<+'a(KBJ=<L(< #"!0( $$"//%%(+ 4(<'%3%'\]%(
B` %'(1+ +*%'(K<B1L(8(1%$&%'
dB/+0(J+##%0(=%*" +#(<+'a(KBJ=<L(< #"!0( $$"//%%(+ 4(<'%3%'\]%(
B` %'(1+ +*%'(K<B1L(8()#/%' +/%
d5+ (-"%* ()33 !"+/" ( P(H \]%' $% /3(K5)?-)HL(2 +'4( P(
-"'%!/ '3(8(F 4()#/%' +/%
d5+ (-"%* ()33 !"+/" ( P(H \]%' $% /3(K5)?-)HL(2+03^ '%(
2"a%`+0( $$"//%%
d5 /^( /0(>! $"!(-%\]%# .$% /( !"#(K>- L(8(1%$&%'(
d5 /^( /0(>! $"!(-%\]%# .$% /( !"#(K>- L(8()#/%' +/%
= CJLK3C%," #&-6 '"6#-$ 17,@"8!"("># ,"#$"2/4" #"1,(TT# - ",(6%"#$" %," #&-6 '7,78,1*"
#" %, 1"6&11,- "1,. #-('"(TT# - 7,- *3
7(8()* "#+',(2% 3 33+ ,(1! + ,(1"%3% (+ 4( +3"##+3(5+#+3
O,*3
9(((
K#3
9(((
=8* ( -3
#$%&!'(!#)*+ !,$-% !1
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 13
!" #&-6 '+,, -."+ -& ,*"/"01($ D(-&(1!"B9 "94B;
6:8996F
-A5 O55AB?()?-(<B55A2G>() @AB?(=>H)=-A?H(=>A?5@)@A?H(
B9Q
A?-><>?->? >(-)I(CA=>DB=X5(A?(5BO@E(5)?(-A>HB(2)I
&$.*% H$#$1 8%*A(3 3 ()+*%:$'(*) *) ', (' :9
P* Q()31 . $)3 R$A( % ', RS&$)< % 8% 1 )'()! Q*/$# & 3($ H$) I( !*< 18*D % !$%3()! 8*' )'($#
+(% 2*%D1 1,*219
-('. &$)$! % =$#; %' 1'$' 3 ',$' 1'$++ 2*"#3 ()A 1'(!$' /*)1(3 %$'(*)1 $)3 *8'(*)1 % #$' 3 '* ,*#3()!
+(% 2*%D1 1,*21 () ', -('.9
LHK JI+F+?FEP\\" L++FKCP
-*")/(#: :; % F )1*"11$) $))*")/ 3 ', "8/*:()! = %('$! &"1 ":T1 M,(;('(*) *) ', C% $' @#**3
*+ GUG? $' ', -(A(/ - )' % Q(;%$%.9 H, M8% 11 3 /*)/ %) % !$%3()! ', /*)3('(*) *+ ', %**+ $' ',
)(:$# -$% @$/(#('.9
I 8"'. &$.*% &( 1 ) $))*")/ 3 $) "8/*:()! -,"#$ 0(1'$ H:$## F"1() 11 H :()$% $)3 1*"%/
OM8*9
-*")/(#: :; % &/-$)) $))*")/ 3 ', % / )' %(;;*) /"''()! +*% "/'(*)1 () &*'(*)< $ ) 2 ;"1() 11 ()
-,"#$ 0(1'$9 = $#1* 18*D % !$%3()! ', H'$' *+ ', B*%' $33% 119
JCO"=CCLEKFO" L++FKCP
6:8999e)R(<' . 3%4(<' !%33%3(P '(-%\]%# ." *(+ 4(2'" *" *(C '`+'4(P '( !"#(
BUQ
3"4%'+/"
dG &&0"3/(=%*"3/'+/" (B'4" + !%
d>f(<+'/%( $$ "!+/" 3(< #"!"%3
d +$.+"* ( /'"& /" (B'4" + !%( .4+/%
2R(5!^%4 #" *(P '(?%f/()26F;W(KB.% (H \]%' $% /(+ 4(>/^"!3L(@'+" " *
-('. ''*%) . C**!()1 1'$' 3 ', -('. ''*%) .T1 V++(/ 2$1 2*%D()! *) $ #*;;.(1' % !(1'%$'(*) *%3()$)/ <
MS8$%' /*::")(/$'(*)1 8*#(/( 1< $)3 $) "83$' '* ', /$:8$(!) /*)'%(;"'(*) *%3()$)/ 9 = 1'$' 3 ,
$)'(/(8$' 3 ;%()!()! % /*:: )3$'(*)1 ;$/D +*% -*")/(# /*)1(3 %$'(*) 2(',() ', ) M' 1(M :*)',19
-('. ''*%) . C**!()1 1'$' 3 $) FG>WXS/*:8#($)' ',(/1 '%$()()! 2*%D1,*8 2*"#3 ; 1/, 3"# 3 +*% $
+"'"% : '()! *+ ', -*")/(#9
-('. ''*%) . C**!()1 $))*")/ 3 ',$' ', -*")/(# 2*"#3 /*)A ) () /#*1 3 1 11(*) '* 3(1/"11 ', (' :1
#(1' 3 ; #*29 = 1'$' 3 I 8"'. &$.*% &( 1 ) 2*"#3 $;1'$() +%*: 8$%'(/(8$'()! () 3(1/"11(*) *+ K' : GX-<
1()/ , ,$3 ; ) $88*()' 3 '* ', -*")/(# $)3 ', :$'' % 2$1 % #$' 3 '* ', $88*()': )' 8%*/ 119
' 75XG 89:9< ', -*")/(# /*)A ) 3 () -#*1 3 H 11(*)9
ILPF0"PFPPJLK
< '3 + /(/ (=%3 # /" (? R(6;\[9:(+ 4( !"#(< #"!0(? R(;W:89;,(BPP"!"+#(1" /%3(+ 4(
'%! '43( P(+!/" (/+a% (4 '" *( # 3%4(5%33" 3(+'%($+" /+" %4(&0(/^%( "/0()// ' %0R
#$%&!'(!#)*+ !,$-% !2
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 14
!" #&-6 '+,, -."+ -& ,*"/"01($ D(-&(1!"B9 "94B;
6:8999W
B?C>=>? >(DA@E(G>H)G( BO?5>G(=>H)=-A?H(>MA5@A?H(
B<Q
GA@AH)@AB?(<O=5O)?@(@B(HBJ>=?1>?@( B->(5> @AB?(
7We7:Re(K4LK6L
?+$%3( P(!+3%3N
)L((Q+$"%() *#" (\]R( "/0( P( ^ #+(J"3/+,(D 'a%'g3( $.% 3+/" (
)..%+#3(2 +'4,( +3%(? R()-QFe77V::\\
2L((-+ (J"##+$" (\]R( "/0( P( ^ #+(J"3/+,(%/(+#R,(O "/%4(5/+/%3(-"3/'"!/(
'/,( +3%(? R(67!\]9FF6W82)58=22\\(+ 4
L(( ^'"3(5^"##" *,(%/(+#R(\]R( "/0( P( ^ #+(J"3/+,(%/(+#R,(5+ (-"%* (
5 .%'" '( '/,( +3%(? R(;\[8F96789999:9e\[8 O81 8 @G
= CJLK3J ,7"B<=3"E,T#1 (8',"(6 #-" *"T,-@ -."$ -(' \]( #-"#$"*, ',7,- Q
J ,7"B<?3"K#"1,T#1 (8',"(6 #-Q
J ,7"B< 3"K#"1,T#1 (8',"(6 #-Q
=0DLHEK+FKC
' Y5G7 89:9< &$.*% -$1(##$1 H$#$1 $3Z*"%) 3 ', : '()! '* ', H8 /($# -('. -*")/(# & '()!1 *)
P$)"$%. GX< >6G?< $' X566 89:9 $)3 ?5G4 89:9< $)3 ', )/ '* ', !"#$% -('. -*")/(# & '()! *)
P$)"$%. >?< >6G?< $' 4566 89:9 () ', -*")/(# -,$:; %19
hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
X%''0(XR(2"*%# `,()33"3/+ /( "/0( #%'a
#$%&!'(!#)*+ !,$-% !3
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 15
!"#! $%&'!( ) '
*++ ,-!* ,% +)!.!/0'#
B$%0)?' =!C',%'0 !A1=!83A:1233!4*
"%,5 &! $'67+0)
89:!1 $!;<+,%+=!>% &? ,-!;
$%&'!( ) '=! ;!@A@A3
D4E F;G! FBH! IJK FG!LIMNDOI4
;GG!BI!IM/EM
!"#$% &!!'#() *+ ',! -#'. -*/("#% *+ ',! -#'. *+ -,/%$ 0#1'$ 2$1 "$%%!3 '* *43!4 $' 5678 9:9 #( ',!
-*/("#% -,$:;!41< %*"$'!3 #( -#'. =$%%< >?@ A*/4', B!(/!< -,/%$ 0#1'$< -$%#+*4(#$9
%1* C4!1!('6 -#'. &$($)!4 =$%;!4'< -#'. ''*4(!. D**)#(1< -#'. -%!4E F*44#1< $(3 11#1'$(' -#'. -%!4E
G#)!%*2
MIGG! ;GG2
!"#$%"&'#( )*& **%)+#,& )-./0 01 '#$-,%))+#,& )-./0 01 '#$. * )#%)2#
40+)+, 2
$%"&'#,%*.//%*#3%/%*
,& )-./0 01 '#45 ./%'
;7)+, 2
4GE/PE!IQ!;GGEPF;K E!BI!BOE!QG;P!;K/!*I*EKB!IQ!DFGEK E
-*/("#%:!:;!4 G!(1*/11$( %!3 ',! C%!3)! *+ %%!)#$("!9
LIMNDOI4
678999:;<=3=>?4?@A>#AB#?C=#,DE?D<4E#4<?3#$43?=<#;E4>#
AR
B<4$=FA<GH#
4)#&I 'I. J#&K#!L #, /! '%/#4'!*#J&'M# '&5'%0#!%*M*#-&0 / ! 2#!%! #
%)2#2'%K!#, /! '%/#4'!*#$%*! '#;/%)N
((!''! A4#'H1",!< 4! 4!1!('#() ',! $( I#!)* J*/', .: ,*(.< 1 *E! 4!)$43#() ',! -*::/(#'. K /1
C4*L!"'9 '/3!('1 $4'#"# $'#() #( ',! K /1 C4*L!"' )$B! 1'4#()M#(1'4/:!(' !4+*4:$("!19
N#4#( &$"$ /)$.< -,$#4< 4! 4!1!('#() ',! -/%'/4$% 4'1 -*::#11#*(< #('4*3/"!3 ',! #'!:9
O('!4#: -/%'/4$% 4'1 &$($)!4 P!11#'*4!MQ* !H )$B! $ 4!1!('$'#*( *( ',! -/%'/4$% 4'1 &$1'!4 C%$(
+4$:!2*4E9
P,! +*%%*2#() #(3#B#3/$%1 1 *E! 4!)$43#() "*::/(#'. $4'1 4*)4$:16
M N$4!( (( I$(#!%1< -,/%$ 0#1'$ 4!1#3!('< :!:;!4 *+ ',! -/%'/4$% 4'1 -*::#11#*(< $(3 4! 4!1!('#()
',! K%3 D%*;!
M (($ '/: < 4'#1' $(3 R3/"$'*4
M R::$(/!% *'*< -,/%$ 0#1'$ 4!1#3!('
M R:#%. S$2*41E#< '/3!('
#$%&!'(!#)*+ !,$-% !"
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 16
! "%,5 &*++ ,-!* ,% +)!.!/0'# C',%'0 !A1=!83A:
P,! +*%%*2#() :!:;!41 *+ ',! /;%#" 1 *E! #( 1/ *4' *+ "*::/(#'. $4'1 4*)4$:1 $(3 ',! -/%'/4$% 4'1
&$1'!4 C%$(6
M D!(! -%!:!('< -,/%$ 0#1'$ 4!1#3!('< 4! 4!1!('#() ',! -,/%$ 0#1'$ 4' D/#%3< $(3 ,! $%1* 4*B#3!3
#(+*4:$'#*( *( ',! -,/%$ 0#1'$ 4' D/#%3
M D4#1!%3$ I!%)$3*< 4! 4!1!('#() ',! -,/%$ 0#1'$ R%!:!('$4. ",**% I#1'4#"'
M /1$( S*,(1*(< -,/%$ 0#1'$ 4!1#3!('
M % D*4!< -,/%$ 0#1'$ 4!1#3!('
M F$'$%#$ 0$%!43#MT*)!41< Q$ &!1$ 4!1#3!('
M S*1! 0!4$< F$'#*($% -#'. 4!1#3!('
M 4:$(3* F/(!H< -,/%$ 0#1'$ 4!1#3!('
O('!4#: -/%'/4$% 4'1 &$($)!4 P!11#'*4!MQ* !H 4!1 *(3!3 '* U/!1'#*(1 +4*: ',! -*/("#%9
;/CIJMK*EKB
' 865V 9:9< &$.*4 -$1#%%$1 $%$1 $3L*/4(!3 ',! :!!'#() '* ',! !"#$% -#'. -*/("#% &!!'#() *(
S$(/$4. W5< >7W@< $' @6W8 9:9< #( ',! RX!"/'#B! -*(+!4!("! T**:< -#'. =$%% M G/#%3#() < $(3 ',!("! '*
',! -#'. -*/("#% &!!'#() *( S$(/$4. >@< >7W@< $' 8677 9:9 #( ',! -*/("#% -,$:;!419
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
G ''"#GN#(.5 /&J+#4**.*!%)!#,.!"#,/ 'M
#$%&!'(!#)*+ !,$-% !.
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 17
!"#! $%&'!( ) '
*++ ,-!* ,% +)!.!/0'#
F$%0)C' A!G',%'0 !3?A!=E311234!5*
!6'&&!.!78+9% :+! ",#+0+,9+!;""<
=>1!? $!@:+,%+A!B% &C ,-!@
$%&'!( ) 'A! @!D3D3E
H57 I@J!*77FIKL!MN!F67! IFO! MPK IJ
@JJ!FM!M;/7;
!"#$% &!!'#() *+ ',! -#'. -*/("#% *+ ',! -#'. *+ -,/%$ 0#1'$ 2$1 "$%%!3 '* *43!4 $' 5678 9:9 #( ',!
;<!"/'#=! -*(+!4!("! >**:? %*"$'!3 #( -#'. @$%%? 7A5 B*/4', =!(/!? -,/%$ 0#1'$? -$%#+*4(#$9
%1* C4!1!('6 D! /'. -#'. ''*4(!. #%=$ $(3 -#'. -%!4E F*44#1
;MJJ! @JJ2
Councilmember#( )*& **%n, C& )-./0 01 '#M-,%))+ Deputy Mayor M. * ) a)2#
50+)+, 2
$%"&'#,%*.//%*#3%/%*
,& )-./0 01 '#45 ./%'
@Q)+, 2
@ FIMK!IF7*H
6789:79;<=>?@;>A3#4< #4BBC;<=$><=3#=C#D;EE#=F>#DCEECA;<G#
3R
@4,4<=#3>4=3#C<#=F>#G?CA=F#$4<4G>$><=#C@>?3;GF=#
,C$$;33;C<H#EC,4E#> I,4=;C<#?>B?>3><=4=;@>+#
3CI=F>43=#JI4 ?4<=#?>3; ><=+#4< #3CI=FA>3=#
JI4 ?4<=#?>3; ><=
C)#<&K 01 '#69+#L967+#!M #N&//&O.)5#.)2.K.2 %/*#' - .K 2#!O&#&'#0&' #
)&0.)%!.&)*#! #.)! 'K. O 2#N&'#!M #K%-%)!#E&-%/#>2 -%!.&)#
? ' * )!%!.K #* %!#&)#!M #G'&O!M#$%)%5 0 )!#CK '*.5M!#
,&00.**.&)H#?&2) "#,% 2.//&+#G' 5&'"#F%//+#A.//. #F%''.*+# %.) #
F&&P '+#E */. #BM%0+#%)2#?&2 '.-P#? .)M%'!
4//#% /.-%)!*#N&'#!M #3& !M %*!#%)2#3& !MO *!#J %2'%)!#? *.2 )!#* %!*#
O.//#1 #.)! 'K. O 2H#?&2) "#,% 2.//&#%)2#A.//. #F%''.*#N&'#3& !M %*!+#%)2#
G/&'.%#Q %' R#N&'#3& !MO *!S
&$.*4 Casillas $%$1 $1E!3 +*4 $(. :!:G!41 *+ ',! /G%#" 2,* 2#1,!3 '* 1 !$E '* ',! #'!:9 H,!4! 2!4! (*(!9
H,! -*/("#% "*(3/"'!3 #('!4=#!21 +*4 ',! I4*2', &$($)!:!(' J=!41#),' -*::#11#*( =$"$("#!19
H,!4! 2$1 "*(1!(1/1 *+ ',! -*/("#% '* 3#4!"' ',! -#'. ''*4(!. '* $:!(3 ',! I4*2', &$($)!:!('
J=!41#),' -*::#11#*( *43#($("! '* $%#)( ',! G*/(3$4#!1 *+ ',! +*/4 4!1#3!('#$% K/$34$('1 2#', ',!
-*/("#% 3#1'4#"' G*/(3$4#!19
&$.*4 Casillas $%$1 4!"!11!3 ',! :!!'#() $' 568L 9:9 H,! -*/("#% 4!"*(=!(!3 $' A6LL 9:9? 2#', $%%
members p 4!1!('9
H,! -*/("#% "*('#(/!3 ',! #('!4=#!219
#$%&!'(!#)*+ !,$-% !"
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 18
! "%,9 &*++ ,-!* ,% +)!.!/0'# G',%'0 !3?A!=E31
&$.*4 Casillas $%$1 4!"!11!3 ',! :!!'#() $' A6ML 9:9 H,! -*/("#% 4!"*(=!(!3 $' A6MN 9:9? 2#', $%%
members p 4!1!('9
H,! -*/("#% "*('#(/!3 ',! #('!4=#!219
&$.*4 Casillas $%$1 $1E!3 +*4 $(. :!:G!41 *+ ',! /G%#" 2,* 2#1,!3 '* 1 !$E '* ',! #'!:9 H,!4! 2!4! (*(!9
@ FIMK2@!<" ",!S')!<'C+!Q ! "%,9 &<+<Q+0!*9 ',,A!)+9",C+C!Q !*' "0! ') &&')!
H'&')A! $' !L&"0 '!G%'0+T!Q+!'UU" , +C! "!0+U0+)+, ! $+!H"% $S+) !V%'C0', R!F$+!
<" ",!9'00 +C!Q ! $+!#"&&"S ,-!:" +2
T#8#( )*& **%)+#$-,%))+#$. * )#%)2#,%*.//%*#3%/%*
O+)2
9###
K"2
9###
@Q) ' ,2
@ FIMK2@!<" ",!S')!<'C+!Q ! "%,9 &<+<Q+0!*9 ',,A!)+9",C+C!Q !*' "0! ') &&')!
H'&')A! $' !;"C,+ ! '%C &&"!Q+!'UU" , +C! "!0+U0+)+, ! $+!H"% $+') !V%'C0', R!
F$+!<" ",!9'00 +C!Q ! $+!#"&&"S ,-!:" +2
T#8#( )*& **%)+#$-,%))+#$. * )#%)2#,%*.//%*#3%/%*
O+)2
9###
K"2
9###
@Q) ' ,2
@ FIMK2@!<" ",!S')!<'C+!Q !Councilmember!B+,)"%))',A!)+9",C+C!Q !*' "0! ') &&')!
H'&')A! $' ! $+!#"&&"S ,-! ,C : C%'&)!Q+!9",) C+0+C! "!0+U0+)+, ! $+!&"9'&!
+C%9' ",'&! , +0+) )2!/%' ,+!6""W+0A!;"C+0 9W!;+ ,$'0 A!',C!L0+-"0 !6'&&R!F$+!
<" ",!9'00 +C!Q ! $+!#"&&"S ,-!:" +2
T#8#( )*& **%)+#$-,%))+#$. * )#%)2#,%*.//%*#3%/%*
O+)2
9###
K"2
9###
@Q) ' ,2
@ FIMK2@!<" ",!S')!<'C+!Q ! Councilmember!B+,)"%))',A!)+9",C+C!Q ! "%,9 &<+<Q+0!
*9 ',,A! $' !/%' ,+!6""W+0!Q+!'UU" , +C! "!0+U0+)+, !&"9'&!+C%9' ",'&!
, +0+) )R!F$+!<" ",!9'00 +C!Q ! $+!#"&&"S ,-!:" +2
T#8#( )*& **%)+#$-,%))+#$. * )#%)2#,%*.//%*#3%/%*
O+)2
9###
K"2
9###
@Q) ' ,2
@/GMP;K*7KF
' N6LM 9:9? &$.*4 -$1#%%$1 $%$1 $3O*/4(!3 ',! :!!'#() '* ',! >!)/%$4 -#'. -*/("#% &!!'#() *(
P$(/$4. 75? 7LQ5? $' 86LL 9:9? #( ',! -*/("#% -,$:G!419
UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU
V ''"#VS#(.5 /&O+#4**.*!%)!#,.!"#,/ 'P
#$%&!'(!#)*+ !,$-% !.
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 19
City of Chula Vista
Staff Report
File#:16-0016, Item#: 2.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
A.Letter of resignation from Nancy Sedgwick, Resource Conservation Commission
B.MemorandumfromCouncilmemberAguilarrequestinganexcusedabsencefromthe
December 8, 2015 City Council meeting.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Council accept the resignation and excuse the absence.
City of Chula VistaPage 1 of 1Printed on 1/21/2016
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 20
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 21
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 22
City of Chula Vista
Staff Report
File#:16-0022, Item#: 3.
ORDINANCEOFTHECITYOFCHULAVISTAAPPROVINGTHETELEGRAPHCANYON
DRAINAGECHANNELUPDATEDNEXUSSTUDYANDAMENDINGORDINANCENO.2384
ACCORDINGLY (SECOND READING AND ADOPTION)
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Council adopt the ordinance.
SUMMARY
In1990,theCityestablishedtheTelegraphCanyonDrainageFeebyCityCouncilOrdinance2384to
fundthenecessaryimprovementsfortheTelegraphCanyonDrainageChannel.Manyofthe
improvementshavebeencompleted.However,duetochangesindesignstandardsandregulatory
environment,certainimprovementscouldnotbecompletedasoriginallyplanned.Asaresult,City
staffcommissionedanexusstudytoidentifyhowthefacilitiescouldbebuilttoaccomplishthe
purposeforwhichtheDrainageFeewasoriginallyestablished.Staffrecommendsamending
Ordinance2384toreflectfacilitiesidentifiedinthenexusstudyrecentlypreparedbyAtkinsNorth
America,Incorporated.Thisamendmentwillnotaffectthedrainagefeewhichiscurrently$4,579per
acre.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Environmental Notice
Theactivityisnota“Project”asdefinedunderSection15378oftheCaliforniaEnvironmentalQuality
ActStateGuidelines;therefore,pursuanttoStateGuidelinesSection15060(c)(3)noenvironmental
review is required.
Environmental Determination
TheproposedactivityhasbeenreviewedforcompliancewiththeCaliforniaEnvironmentalQuality
Act(CEQA)andithasbeendeterminedthattheactivityisnota“Project”asdefinedunderSection
15378oftheStateCEQAGuidelinesbecauseitwillnotresultinaphysicalchangeinthe
environment;therefore,pursuanttoSection15060(c)(3)oftheStateCEQAGuidelines,theactivityis
notsubjecttoCEQA.Althoughenvironmentalreviewisnotnecessaryatthistime,whenprojects
havebeendefined,environmentalreviewwillberequiredandaCEQAdeterminationwillbe
completed prior to commencing any of the improvements as described in the Study.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
Not Applicable
DISCUSSION
TheTelegraphCanyonDrainageFee(TCDrainageFee)wasestablishedonJuly17,1990,by
City of Chula VistaPage 1 of 4Printed on 1/21/2016
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 23
File#:16-0022, Item#: 3.
OrdinanceNo.2384(Attachment1)tofundtheconstructionoftherequireddrainagefacilitieswithin
theTelegraphCanyonDrainageBasin.Theseimprovementswerenecessarytoaccommodatethe
surfaceandstormwaterrunoffresultingfromdevelopmentofpropertieswithinthebasin.TheTC
DrainageFeebenefitareaconsistsofRanchoDelReySpecificPlan,OtayRanch,andaportionof
Rolling Hills and Eastlake, all of which are nearly built out (Attachment 2).
The following drainage facilities identified in the original 1990 TC Drainage Fee plan are completed:
Constructionofapproximately4,450feetofvegetatedchannelsbetweenRutgersRoadand
thewesterlyEastlakeboundary(WestofStateRoute125).ConstructedbytheEastlake
Development Company.
Constructionofapproximately8,500feetofvegetatedchannelsbetweenPaseoLaderaand
OtayLakesRoad.Phase2-ConstructedbytheEastlakeDevelopmentCompany.
Constructed by the Eastlake Development Company.
Constructionofapproximately3,200feetofvegetatedchannelsbetweenOtayLakesRoad
and Rutgers Road. Constructed by the Eastlake Development Company.
Constructionofapproximately2,400feetofrectangularconcretechannelimprovements
between K Street and Sierra Highway. Constructed by the City (CIP DR118)
Theoriginal1990TCDrainageFeeplanalsoidentifieddrainagefacilitiesthatremaintobe
constructedwithintheTelegraphCanyonDrainageChannel(Channel)whicharesubjecttoflooding.
TheremainingdrainagefacilitiesaresubjecttocurrentCitydesignstandardsandcurrentregulatory
environmentalrequirementsrequiringtheapprovalofResourceAgenciesforanyproposedwork
withinthewetlandareasoftheChannel.TheResourceAgenciesconsistoftheU.S.ArmyCorpsof
Engineers,U.S.FishandWildlifeService,RegionalWaterQualityControlBoard,andCalifornia
Department of Fish and Wildlife.
PreliminarycoordinationwiththeResourceAgencieshasrevealedthatcurrentenvironmental
requirementsrequireprovidingnewdrainageimprovementswithengineerednaturaloptions.These
optionsmayincludeaddingdetentionbasinstoreducetheflow,alternatealignments,andmodified
earthenconfigurationsoftheChannel.CurrentCitydesignstandardsconsistofupdatedrainfall
intensity analysis for quantifying storm events.
AsaresultofthecurrentregulatoryenvironmentalrequirementsandcurrentCitydesignstandards,
theCityretainedAtkinsNorthAmerica,Incorporatedtoprepareanexusstudytoidentifydrainage
improvementsthatwouldservethesamepurposeandbenefitthesameTCDrainageFeebenefit
areapropertiesastheoriginalfacilities.Thenewstudyisentitled“TelegraphCanyonChannel
NexusStudy,”datedNovember24,2015,(Study).TheStudyidentifiesTCDrainageFeeeligible
facilities(FeeFacilities)thatarerecommendedwithinthebasinatacostofapproximately$9.3
million(Attachment3).TheStudyidentifiesthereasonablerelationshipbetweentheuseofthefee
fortheconstructionoftheFeeFacilitiesandthedevelopmentofpropertieswithinthebasin.The
identifiedFeeFacilitiesarenecessarytomitigatetheimpactsofdevelopmentoccurringwithinthe
basin and are therefore eligible for inclusion in the TC Drainage Fee.
DevelopmentandcompletionoftheremainingFeeFacilitiesidentifiedintheStudywillbeproposed
forinclusioninfutureannualCapitalImprovementProgrambudgets.ItisanticipatedthattheTC
City of Chula VistaPage 2 of 4Printed on 1/21/2016
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 24
File#:16-0022, Item#: 3.
DrainageFeefundswillbeinsufficienttoconstructallthefacilitiesidentifiedintheStudy.OnceTC
DrainageFeefundsareexpendedinfull,otherfundingsources(GasTax,Transnet,grants,etc.)
may be used to complete the projects.
Current Fee
In1990,theCityCounciladoptedOrdinance2384establishingtheTelegraphCanyonDrainageFee
at$3,922peracre.The1990actionindicated$7.7millionofestimatedcostsoffutureTelegraph
Canyondrainagefacilities.Theestimatedcostof$7.7millionwasspreadamong1,975benefited
acreageswithinthebasinresultinginafeeof$3,922peracre.Thecurrentfeeof$4,579peracre
includesaone-timeEngineeringNewsRecordConstructionIndex(ENRCI)adjustmentmadein1998
per City Council adopted Resolution 18965 (Attachment 5).
Recommendations
InordertocompleteconstructionoftheTelegraphCanyonDrainageBasinfacilities,staff
recommendsthattheCityCouncilapprovethe“TelegraphCanyonChannelNexusStudy,”dated
November24,2015,andamendOrdinance2384asshowninAttachment6toincorporatethe
facilities identified in the Study into the Telegraph Canyon DIF.
AftertheTCDrainageFeeFundbalanceisdepletedortheprojectsarecompleted,staffwillreturnto
Council to consider repealing the ordinance.
DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT
StaffhasreviewedthepropertyholdingsoftheCityCouncilmembersandhasfoundthatMayorMary
CasillasSalasandCouncilMembersJohnMcCann,PatriciaAguilarandPamelaBensoussanhave
realpropertyholdingswithin500feetoftheboundariesofthepropertywhichisthesubjectofthis
action.However,itisnotreasonablyforeseeablethatthedecisionwillhaveaneffectontheCouncil
Members’financialinterests.Totheextentthatanydecisionwouldhaveareasonablyforeseeable
financialeffectonthemember’srealproperty,theeffectwouldbenominal,inconsequential,or
insignificant.TheTelegraphCanyonDrainagefeeisaconnectionfeethatwaspaidatthetimeof
developmentofthesubjectparcels.ThepropertiesownedbytheidentifiedCouncilmembersare
existingresidences,thus,theCouncilmemberswillnotbesubjecttothefee.Inaddition,the
propertiesownedbytheCouncilmemberswerenotidentifiedaspropertiessubjecttothefeewhen
theTelegraphCanyonDrainagefeewasadopted.Finally,thefacilitiestobeconstructedwillreplace
andservethesamepurposeaspreviouslyapproveddrainagefacilities.Consequently,pursuantto
CaliforniaCodeofRegulationsTitle2,sections18700,18701(b),18702(b),and18702.2(c)(1),this
itemdoesnotrepresentarealproperty-relatedconflictofinterestunderthePoliticalReformAct(Cal.
Gov't Code § 87100, et seq.).
Staffisnotindependentlyaware,andhasnotbeeninformedbyanyCouncilmember,ofanyother
fact that may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter.
LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS
TheCity’sStrategicPlanhasfivemajorgoals:OperationalExcellence,EconomicVitality,Healthy
Community,StrongandSecureNeighborhoodsandaConnectedCommunity.Ordinance2384
supportedtheEconomicVitalitygoalintheCity’sStrategicPlan.Itprovidesforplanningdrainage
City of Chula VistaPage 3 of 4Printed on 1/21/2016
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 25
File#:16-0022, Item#: 3.
infrastructure of new development, which is a key City function in supporting new growth.
CURRENT YEAR FISCAL IMPACT
AllcostsassociatedwiththisprocurementandpreparationoftheStudywillbebornebythe
TelegraphCanyonDrainageFeeFund.Approvalofthisresolutionwillresultinnonetimpacttothe
Telegraph Canyon Drainage Fee Fund in the current fiscal year.
ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT
ThecurrentlyavailableTelegraphCanyonDrainageFeeFundfundsofapproximately$5.2millionwill
beusedtoconstructtheremainingprojects.Basedoncurrentproposedprojectestimatesandthe
limitednumberofacresremainingtopayintotheTCDrainageFeeprogram,itisanticipatedthat
futureappropriationsfromtheTelegraphCanyonDrainageFeeFundwillneedtobeaugmentedwith
otherfundingsources(GasTax,Transnet,grants,etc.)inordertocompleteallprojectsidentifiedin
the Study.
Annual routine maintenance will be required after completion of identified Fee Facilities.
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment 1:Ordinance 2384
Attachment 2:Telegraph Canyon Drainage Fee Basin
Attachment 3:Telegraph Canyon Channel Nexus Study
Attachment 4:Resolution 2015-106
Attachment 5:Resolution 18965
Attachment 6:Redline strikeout version of Ordinance 2384
Staff Contact: Luis Pelayo, Associate Civil Engineer
City of Chula VistaPage 4 of 4Printed on 1/21/2016
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 26
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 27
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 28
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 29
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 30
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 31
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 32
SECOND READING AND ADOPTION
ORDINANCE NO.
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING
THE TELEGRAPH CANYON DRAINAGE CHANNEL
UPDATED NEXUS STUDY AND AMENDING ORDINANCE
NO. 2384 ACCORDINGLY
WHEREAS, in 1990, the City Council enacted Ordinance No. 2384,approvingthe “City
of Chula Vista, California, Telegraph Canyon Drainage Plan,” dated June 6, 1990, Telegraph
Canyon Drainage Plan (“Drainage Plan”) as the plan for construction of planned local drainage
facilities for the Telegraph Canyon Drainage District and establishingtheTelegraph Canyon
Drainage Fee (“TC Drainage Fee”) to fund the construction of the required drainage facilities
within the Telegraph Canyon Basin,as identified in the Drainage Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Drainage Plan was based upon regulatory environmental requirements
and City design standards in place at the time of adoption; and
WHEREAS, due to changes in those requirements and standards,certaindrainage
facilities contained in the Drainage Plan cannot be completed as originally contemplated in the
Drainage Plan andremain to be constructed; and
WHEREAS, as a result, it is appropriate to reanalyze and reevaluate the remaining
facilities to be built to ensure their designand construction meets current standards and
regulatory requirements;and
WHEREAS,consistent with California Government Code Sections 66000, et seq., the
CityCouncil recently caused a study to be conducted to reanalyze and reevaluate the adequacy
of the existing Telegraph Canyon Channel facilities to accommodate the surface and storm water
runoff resulting from development of properties within the Telegraph Canyon Basinand to
identify remaining facilities to be built to serve the same purpose, andbenefit the same land, for
which the TC Drainage Fee was collected; and
WHEREAS, the study was prepared by Atkins North America, Inc. and is entitled
“Telegraph Canyon Channel Nexus Study,” dated November 24, 2015,(“Updated Nexus
Study”); and
WHEREAS, the Updated Nexus Study identifies planneddrainage improvements to
accomplishserve the same purpose and benefit the same TC Drainage Fee benefit area properties
as the facilitiesidentified in the original Drainage Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Updated Nexus Study supports, and staff recommends, the use of TC
Drainage Feesto fund the planneddrainage facilities identified in the Updated Nexus Study,
which are required to mitigate the impacts of development within the Telegraph Canyon Basin;
and
WHEREAS, the Development Services Director has reviewed the proposed activity for
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act(“CEQA”) and has determined that
C:\\Users\\GRANIC~1\\AppData\\Local\\Temp\\BCL Technologies\\easyPDF 7\\@BCL@4C06C4BE\\@BCL@4C06C4BE.doc
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 33
Ordinance
Page 2
the proposed ordinance is not a "Project" as defined under Section 15378 of the State CEQA
Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) no environmental review
is required.
NOW THEREFORE the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does ordain as follows:
Section I.Findings.
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista hereby makes the following
legislative findings and determinations:
A.Development of the Telegraph Canyon Drainage Basin has necessitated the
construction of drainage facilities, as identified in the “City of Chula Vista, California, Telegraph
Canyon Drainage Plan,” dated June 6, 1990, and approved by Ordinance No. 2384(“Drainage
Plan”); the City has been unable to complete certain of those improvements due to changed
circumstances, including design standards and regulatory requirements.
B. In order to complete construction of drainage facilitiesnecessary to meet the
needs of the TelegraphCanyon Basin, the City has caused an updated study to be prepared by
Atkins North America, Inc., dated November 24, 2015 (the “Updated Nexus Study”), which
identifies facilities to be constructed which serve the same purpose as the original Drainage Plan
and benefit the same properties which were included in the Telegraph Canyon Drainage Fee.
C. The Updated Nexus Study, in the form presented and on file in the Office of
the City Clerk, updates the list of planned drainage facilities needed to accommodate
development of the Telegraph Canyon Basin benefit area. The Updated Nexus Study is hereby
approved as the plan for construction of the remaining planned local drainage facilities required
within the Telegraph Canyon Basin.
D. The Updated Nexus Study is consistent with the City’s General Plan and will
ensure that increased surface and storm water runoff resulting from or attributable to new
development within the drainage basin will be removed in a manner which furthers the public
health, safety and welfare. In addition to participation in the construction of drainage facilities as
set forth in the Study, developers of property within the benefit area will be required to construct
other on and off site drainage facilities as a condition of development pursuant to existing laws
and policies of the City.
Section II.Ordinance Amendment.
Ordinance No. 2384 is hereby amended as follows:
A. Section I.B. is amended to read as follows:
“Areport entitled, “City of Chula Vista, California,
Telegraph Canyon Drainage Plan,” dated June 6, 1990,
and on file with the City Clerk, establishes the boundaries
of the Telegraph Canyon Drainage Basin, the boundaries
of the Telegraph Canyon Drainage Improvement District
and the boundaries of the areaof benefit of the Telegraph
Canyon Drainage Improvement, the extent of the
additional drainage facilities needed to accommodate new
development in the Drainage District and a proposed
allocation of fees to pay for the drainage facilities. The
Telegraph Canyon Drainage Plan, is hereby approved as
the plan for construction of planned local drainage
facilities for the Telegraph Canyon Drainage District,
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 34
Ordinance
Page 3
including the facilities identifiedin the “Telegraph
Canyon Channel Nexus Study,” dated November 24,
2015, (“Updated Nexus Study”).”
B. Section I.C. is amended to add the following to the end of the section:
“TheUpdated Nexus Study is consistent with the City’s
General Plan and will ensure that increased surface and
storm water runoff resulting from or attributable to new
development within the drainage basin will be removed in
a manner which furthers the public health, safety and
welfare. In addition to participation in the construction of
drainage facilities as set forth in the Study, developers of
property within thebenefit area will be required to
construct other on and off site drainage facilities as a
condition of development pursuant to existing laws and
policies of the City.”
C. Section I. D.is hereby amended to read as follows:
“The development of property within the Telegraph
Canyon Drainage Basin will require the construction of
those drainage facilities described in the Telegraph
Canyon Drainage Plan, the Updated Nexus Study,and
other on and off site drainage facilities. Properties within
the Drainage District shown in the Drainage Plan benefit
by construction of the drainage facilities set forth in the
Plan to the extent that payment of the fee and construction
of the drainage facilities will allow the properties to be
developed according to the general plan.”
D. Section I.E. is hereby amended as follows:
1. In the first sentence, add “, and the Updated Nexus Study,” after the
word “Plan” on the second line;
2. In subsection 1., add “, and the Updated Nexus Study,” after the word
“Plan” on the second line, and on the eighth line.
E. Section X. is hereby amended as follows:
In subsection F., add “and the Updated Nexus Study” after the word
“Plan.”
F. Except as specifically amended in this ordinance, Ordinance No. 2384 shall
remain in full force and effect.
Section III. California Environmental Quality Act Findings for Statutory
Exemption
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby find that the planneddrainage
facilitiesas described in the Study are necessary to maintain service within the Basin. The
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 35
Ordinance
Page 4
proposed activity does not involve any commitment to any specific“Project” as defined under
Section 15378of the State CEQA Guidelineswhich may result in a potentially significant
physical impact on the environment. Therefore, the City finds that the adoption of this ordinance
is statutorily exempt under the provisions of CEQA Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3).
Section IV. Time Limit for Protest and Judicial Action
Any judicial action or proceeding to attack, review, set aside, void or annul this
Ordinance shall be brought within the period as established by law.
Section V.Severability
If any portion of this Ordinance, or its application to any person or circumstance, is for
reason held to be invalid, unenforceable or unconstitutional, by a court of competent
any
jurisdiction, that portion shall be deemed severable, and such invalidity, unenforceability or
unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining portions of the
Ordinance, or its applicationto any other person or circumstance. The City Council of the City of
Chula Vista hereby declares that it would have adopted each section, sentence, clause or phrase
of this Ordinance, irrespective of the fact that any one or more other sections, sentences, clauses
or phrases of the Ordinance be declared invalid, unenforceable or unconstitutional.
Section VI. Construction
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista intends this Ordinance to supplement, not to
duplicateor contradict, applicable state and federal law and this Ordinance shall be construed in
light of that intent.
Section VII. Effective Date
This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force on the thirtieth day after its final passage.
Section VII. Publication
The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause
the same to be published or posted according to law.
Presented byApproved as to form by
_________________________________________________________________________
Richard A. HopkinsGlen R. Googins
Director of Public WorksCity Attorney
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 36
V
A SR
EG
TUR
508
ETATS
RETNI
D
VL
B
Y
A
B
City of Chula Vista
Telegraph Canyon Channel
Nexus Study
(DR203)
November 24, 2015
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 38
06064 | AD | 15
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 39
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 40
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 41
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 42
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 43
0 ¦¤ 44
VA S
RE
GTU
R
EM
LACID
TNEC
D RE
R
BRANDYWINE AV
F
VA HTRUO
Packet
!¦¤£
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ
Y
A
W
E
E
R
F
-5
I
L
B
Y
A
B
0 ¦¤ 45
Packet
!¦¤£
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ
0 ¦¤ 46
Packet
!¦¤£
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 47
Drainage Area Drainage Area (sq Curve USACE Lag NRCS lag
Node (acres) mi) Number (min) (min)
DIF East
1.La Media1527 2.4 90 24.6 23.7
2.Telegraph Canyon Road1970 3.1 90 35.4 33.0
3.Paseo Ranchero2147 3.4 90 39.0 36.1
4.Paseo Ladera2524 3.9 90 43.8 40.3
DIF West
5.Hilltop Drive3444 5.4 91 54.0 49.0
6.First Avenue3669 5.7 91 56.4 51.1
7.L Street and Third Avenue3941 6.2 89 58.8 53.2
8.Fourth Avenue4013 6.3 89 60.6 54.7
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 48
Location 2-year5-year10-year 25-year 50-year 100-year
DIF East
1.La Media355 571 760 1,030 1,249 1,480
2.Telegraph Canyon Road383 617 823 1,116 1,354 1,605
3.Paseo Ranchero396 637 849 1,155 1,404 1,666
4.Paseo Ladera437 703 938 1,275 1,550 1,839
DIF West
5.Hilltop Drive598 935 1,229 1,648 1,986 2,340
6.First Avenue606 947 1,243 1,666 2,007 2,364
7.L Street and Third Avenue
606 947 1,243 1,666 2,007 2,364
8.Fourth Avenue
606 947 1,243 1,666 2,007 2,364
Location Peak Flow (cfs)
DIF East
2004 Drainage Master Plan 4340
2012 FEMA FIS 2200
NOAA Atlas 14 2340
DIF West
2004 Drainage Master Plan (Paseo Ladera) 3600
NOAA Atlas 14 (Paseo Ladera) 1839
2012 FEMA FIS (Upstream La Media) 1197
NOAA Atlas 14 (La Media) 1480
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 49
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 50
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 51
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 52
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 53
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 54
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 55
Location Scenario Facility Capacity (event - cfs) Flood Hazard
Third Avenue and L Street area
Double 9' x 4' concrete box Flooding of 3rd and L Street
Existing 2-year peak 606 cfs
culvert intersection
Replace existing culverts
L Street
with double 16' x 10'
Eliminate flooding of 3rd and L
Option 1 concrete box culverts through 100-year peak 2,364 cfs
Street intersection
Third Ave. - ~505 linear feet
(L&Third)
Flooding of 3rd and L Street
Existing 10' x 5.5' Arch and 60" RCP 2-year peak 606 cfs
intersection
Replace existing culverts
Third Avenue
with double 16' x 10' Eliminate flooding of 3rd and L
Option 1 100-year peak 2,364 cfs
concrete box culverts 505 Street intersection
linear feet (L&Third)
Heavy vegetation contributes to
flooding issues at 3rd and L
Existing natural channel 100-year peak 2,364 cfs
intersection. Scour problems on
Northwest bank
Channel
upstream of L Replace existing natural
Street and channel with 21' x 10' Reduction in frequency of
Option 1 100-year peak 2,364 cfs
downstream of rectangular concrete channel flooding events
Third Avenue 1400 linear feet
Bank Protection added to the
Eliminate scour along Northwest
Option 2 Northwest bank 100-year peak 2,364 cfs
bank
1400 linear feet
Country Club Drive, First Avenue, Hilltop Park
8' x 8' concrete box culverts
Properties subject to flooding in
in both locations
Existing 2-year peak 598 cfswest Hilltop Park and on South
First Ave 136 linear ft
side of Country Club Drive
Country Club 105 linear ft
Replace existing culverts
with 20' x 10' concrete box
Reduction in FEMA Zone AE,
First Avenue and
culverts in both locations
Option 1 100-year peak 2,340 cfsincluding removal of homes
Country Club
from floodplain
First Ave 136 linear ft
Drive Crossings
Country Club 105 linear ft
Add double 60" RCP to
existing concrete box culverts
Reduction in frequency of
in both locations
Option 2 10-year peak 1,229 cfs
flooding events
First Ave 136 linear ft
Country Club 105 linear ft
Trapezoidal grouted riprap
Properties subject to flooding in
channel
Existing 5-year peak 935 cfswest Hilltop Park and on South
Channel from
side of Country Club Drive
620 linear feet total
Country Club
Drive to Hilltop
Channel redesign to 20' x 10'
Reduction in FEMA Zone AE,
Park
rectangular concrete channel
Option 1 100-year peak 2,340 cfsincluding removal of homes
from floodplain
620 linear feet total
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 56
Location Scenario Facility Capacity (event - cfs) Flood Hazard
Country Club Drive, First Avenue, Hilltop Park
100-year flooding almost entirely
Low flow concrete channel
Less than 2-year peak
Existing limited to Hilltop Park; scour
598 cfs
1,400 linear feet
issues around low flow channel
Channel redesign to 10'
100-year flooding almost entirely
bottom width, 4H:1V side
limited to Hilltop Park, reduction
slopes Articulated Concrete
Option 1 10-year peak 1,229 cfs
in FEMA Zone AE near First
Block (ACB) - 6" thickness
Channel through
Avenue
Hilltop Park
1,400 linear feet
Channel redesign to 10'
100-year flooding almost entirely
bottom width, 4H:1V side
limited to Hilltop Park, reduction
slopes Articulated Concrete
Option 2 10-year peak 1,229 cfs
in FEMA Zone AE near First
Block (ACB) - 4" thickness
Avenue
1,400 linear feet
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 57
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 58
Planning Level Cost
Estimate Future Constructed Cost Total Costs
Facility Linear Feet Project Needs Previously Funded Future and Funded
700 N/A $1,678,118 $1,678,118
1,905 $5,700,000 N/A $5,700,000
3rd & L
861 $2,200,000 N/A $2,200,000
1st & Country Club
Hilltop Park 1,400 $1,400,000 N/A $1,400,000
Totals 4,866 $9,300,000 $1,678,118
$10,78,118
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 59
City of Chula Vista
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT \\ DESIGN
COST ESTIMATE
Project Number:
DATE: November 24, 2015
Project Title:
PREPARED BY: Ann Bechtel
Telegraph Canyon Nexus Study - 3rd & L
Planning Level Estimate CHECKED BY: Luis Pelayo
No. Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Amount
1 21'w x 10'h Concrete Rectangular Open Channel 1400 LF $805.00 $1,127,000.00
2 Double 16'w x 10'h Box Culvert 505 LF $2,977.00 $1,503,385.00
2 Environmental & Mitigation (consultant) 1 Each $500,000.00 $500,000.00
3 Staging 1 Each $17,000.00 $17,000.00
4 CLOMR/LOMR 1 Each $20,000.00 $20,000.00
5 Erosion 1 Each $34,000.00 $34,000.00
6 Traffic 1 Each $75,000.00 $75,000.00
7 Insurance & Bonds 1 Each $24,000.00 $24,000.00
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Subtotal: $3,300,385.00
30.0 % $3,300,385.00 $990,120.00
Contingencies
10.0 % $3,300,385.00 $330,040.00
Construction Inspection (staff costs)
10.0 % $3,300,385.00 $330,040.00
Design (staff costs)
3.0 % $3,300,385.00 $99,010.00
Survey Work (staff costs)
Right-of-Way Acquisition and Staff Costs
1.0 ls $352,500.00 $352,500.00
(includes 50% markup)
2.0 % $3,300,385.00 $66,010.00
Planning/Environmental (staff costs)
2.0 % $3,300,385.00 $66,010.00
Public Works (staff costs)
5.0 % $3,300,385.00 $165,020.00
Other including water utilities
Subtotal: $2,398,750.00
$5,699,135.00
TOTAL:
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 60
City of Chula Vista
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT \\ DESIGN
COST ESTIMATE
Project Number:
DATE: November 24, 2015
Project Title:
PREPARED BY: Ann Bechtel
Telegraph Canyon Nexus Study - 1st & Country Club
Planning Level Estimate CHECKED BY: Luis Pelayo
No. Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Amount
1 Remove & Upsize 1st St Culvert (20'w x 10'h) 136 LF $1,917.00 $260,712.00
Remove & Upsize Country Club Culvert $2,009.00 $210,945.00
LF
2 (20'w x 10'h) 105
3 Concrete Rectangular Open Channel (20'w x 10'h) 620 LF $797.00 $494,140.00
4 Environmental & Mitigation (consultant) 1 Each $100,000.00 $100,000.00
5 Staging 1 Each $17,000.00 $17,000.00
6 CLOMR/LOMR 1 Each $20,000.00 $20,000.00
7 Erosion 1 Each $34,000.00 $34,000.00
8 Traffic 1 Each $75,000.00 $75,000.00
9 Insurance & Bonds 1 Each $24,000.00 $24,000.00
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Subtotal: $1,235,797.00
30.0 % $1,235,797.00 $370,740.00
Contingencies
10.0 % $1,235,797.00 $123,580.00
Construction Inspection (staff costs)
10.0 % $1,235,797.00 $123,580.00
Design (staff costs)
3.0 % $1,235,797.00 $37,070.00
Survey Work (staff costs)
Right-of-Way and Staff Augmentation
1.0 ls $202,500.00 $202,500.00
(includes 50% markup)
2.0 % $1,235,797.00 $24,720.00
Planning/Environmental (staff costs)
2.0 % $1,235,797.00 $24,720.00
Public Works (staff costs)
5.0 % $1,235,797.00 $61,790.00
Other including water utilities
Subtotal: $968,700.00
$2,204,497.00
TOTAL:
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 61
City of Chula Vista
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT \\ DESIGN
COST ESTIMATE
Project Number:
DATE: November 24, 2015
Project Title:
Telegraph Canyon Nexus Study - Hilltop Park PREPARED BY: Ann Bechtel
Planning Level Estimate CHECKED BY: Luis Pelayo
No. Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Amount
1 6" thick EnviroFlex articulated concrete block 70000 SF $9.50 $665,000.00
(1400 LF @50'w)
2 Environmental & Mitigation (consultant) 1 Each $30,000.00 $30,000.00
3 Staging 1 Each $17,000.00 $17,000.00
4 Irrigation & Landscaping 1 Each $50,000.00 $50,000.00
5 CLOMR/LOMR 1 Each $20,000.00 $20,000.00
6 Erosion 1 Each $34,000.00 $34,000.00
7 Insurance & Bonds 1 Each $24,000.00 $24,000.00
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Subtotal: $840,000.00
30.0 % $840,000.00 $252,000.00
Contingencies
10.0 % $840,000.00 $84,000.00
Construction Inspection (staff costs)
10.0 % $840,000.00 $84,000.00
Design (staff costs)
3.0 % $840,000.00 $25,200.00
Survey Work (staff costs)
1.0 ls $0.00 $-
Right-of-Way Acquisition and Staff Costs
2.0 % $840,000.00 $16,800.00
Planning/Environmental (staff costs)
2.0 % $840,000.00 $16,800.00
Public Works (staff costs)
5.0 % $840,000.00 $42,000.00
Other
Subtotal: $520,800.00
$1,360,800.00
TOTAL:
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 62
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 63
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 64
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 65
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 66
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 67
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 68
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 69
·
·
·
·
·
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 70
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 71
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 72
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 73
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 74
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 75
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 76
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 77
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 78
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 79
ORDINANCE NO. 2384
ANORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING TELEGRAPH CANYON
DRAINAGE PLAN AND ESTABLISHING THE TELEGRAPH
CANYON DRAINAGE FEE
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista, California does ordain as follows:
SECTION I.
Findings and Determinations. The City Council of the City of Chula Vista,
California, hereby makes the following legislative findings and determinations:
A.Development in the Telegraph Canyon Drainage Basin requires the construction
of drainage facilities which are additional to drainage facilities serving the area at
the time of adoption of this ordinance.
B.A report entitled, "City of Chula Vista, California, Telegraph Canyon Drainage
Plan," dated June 6, 1990, and on file with the City Clerk, establishes the
boundaries of the Telegraph Canyon Drainage Basin, the boundaries of the
Telegraph Canyon Drainage Improvement District and the boundaries of the area
of benefit of the Telegraph Canyon Drainage Improvements, the extent of the
additional drainage facilities needed to accommodate new development in the
Drainage District and a proposed allocation of fees to pay for the drainage
facilities. The Telegraph Canyon Drainage Plan is hereby approved as the plan for
construction of planned local drainage facilities for the Telegraph Canyon
Drainage District.
C.The Telegraph Canyon Drainage Plan is consistent with the City's General Plan
and will ensure that increased surface and storm water runoff resulting from or
attributable to new development within the drainage basin will be removed in a
manner which furthers the public health, safety and welfare. In addition to
participation in the construction of the planned drainage facilities as set forth in
the Drainage Plan, developers of property within the Drainage District will be
required to construct other on and off site drainage facilities as a condition of
development pursuant to existing laws and policies of the City.
ensure that increased surface and storm water runoff resulting from or attributable
to new development within the drainage basin will be removed in a manner which
furthers the public health, safety and welfare. In addition to participation in the
construction of drainage facilities as set forth in the Study, developers of property
within the benefit area will be required to construct other on and off site drainage
facilities as a condition of development pursuant to existing laws and policies of
the City.
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 80
Ordinance
Page 2
D.The development of property within the Telegraph Canyon Drainage Basin will
require the construction of those drainage facilities described in the Telegraph
Canyon Drainage Plan, the Updated Nexus Study, and other on and off site
drainage facilities. Properties within the Drainage District shown in the Drainage
Plan benefit by construction of the drainage facilities set forth in the Plan to the
extent that payment of the fee and construction of the drainage facilities will
allow the properties to be developed according to the general plan.
E.For the reasons set forth in the Telegraph Canyon Drainage Plan and in the reports
relied upon and referenced in that Plan, and the Updated Nexus Study, and based
upon the City's General Plan, and the matters presented to the City Council at the
public hearing at which this Ordinance was considered and the laws and policies
of the City relating to development of property, the City Council makes the
following additional legislative findings and determinations:
1.The Planned Drainage Facilities as described in the Telegraph Canyon
Drainage Plan, and the Updated Nexus Study, are required in order to
accommodate the surface and storm water run off resulting from
development of property within the Telegraph Canyon Drainage District.
The estimated cost of the proposed facilities are based upon standard
engineering practices and are reasonably determined. The Planned
Drainage Facilities described in the Plan, and the Updated Nexus Study,
are necessary to allow development of properties within the District and to
mitigate the impact resulting from the development of those properties.
Therefore, each property should contribute to the cost of the facilities
based upon a flat amount per gross acre as set forth in the Drainage Plan.
The flat, per acre fee established by this Ordinance is reasonably and fairly
apportioned based upon the benefit conferred upon each property or upon
the need for the facilities created by the development of property within
the Drainage Improvement Benefit Area.
2.There is a reasonable relationship between the use of the fee for the
construction of the Planned Drainage Facilities and the development of the
property within the Drainage basin because development increases run off
and retards the natural ability of the undeveloped land to absorb storm and
surface waters.
3.There is a reasonable relationship between the construction of the Planned
Drainage Facility and the various land uses for the property set forth on
the City's General Plan because the run off and surface water diversion
resulting from development of the property as shown on the City's General
Plan will on the average be the same for the various land uses permitted
within the Plan area.
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 81
Ordinance
Page 3
4.The amount of the fees to be collected pursuant to this Ordinance does not
exceed the estimated cost of providing the facilities. If, at any time, it
appears that the amount of the fees will exceed the estimated cost of the
proposed facilities, including all administrative and incidental costs, then
the fee shall be adjusted accordingly.
SECTION II.
Determination of Costs. The City Council finds that the total cost of
providing the planned drainage facility as estimated in 1990 is $7,745,100.00. If the costs are
apportioned uniformly on a per acre basis to the benefited properties as shown in the Telegraph
Canyon Drainage Plan, the pro rata charge for each gross acre would be $3,922.00.
SECTION III.
Drainage Fees Established. A drainage fee in the amount of $3,922.00
per gross benefit acre of undeveloped land is hereby established for each development project
.
within the Telegraph Canyon Drainage Benefit area
The fee is a requirement of each development project, tentative map, tentative parcel map, or
building permit within the benefit area and shall be paid before the approval by the City of the
development project. For any development for which a fee was not paid at the time of approval
of the final map or parcel map, the fee shall be paid before the issuance of the first building
permit for the development. Payment at the time established by this Section is necessary to
assure that the drainage facilities identified in this Plan may be constructed concurrent with need.
For the purpose of determining fees, gross benefit acreage shall mean all land area within the
outermost boundaries of a subdivision or development including all areas dedicated for public
streets. The fees for fractional acreages shall be prorated. The Telegraph Canyon Road right-of-
way and the Telegraph Canyon channel easement are excluded from the gross benefit acreage.
SECTION IV.
Adjustment of Fees. The City Council shall periodically, but not less than
once annually, review the amount of the fee established by this Ordinance. The City Council, by
resolution, may adjust the amount of the fee as necessary to reflect changes in the Engineering
News Record Construction Index, the cost of the drainage facilities, changes in land use
designation and other sound engineering and financing information. The ENR Construction
Index, for June, 1990, is $4,734.77.
SECTION V.
Use of Fees. The fees collected pursuant to this Ordinance shall be
deposited in a separate fund as designated by the Finance Director and shall be expended only
:
for the following purposes
A.To pay for the construction of facilities by the City, or to reimburse the City for
facilities installed by the City with funds from other resources;
B.To reimburse developers or subdividers of property who have installed all or a
portion of the Planned Local Drainage Facilities;
C.To repay indebtedness incurred by the City to construct the Planned Drainage
Facilities should the City Council determine to incur such indebtedness;
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 82
Ordinance
Page 4
D.To reimburse the City for the cost of engineering and administrative services to
form the district, establish the fee and construct the facilities.
SECTION VI.
Construction of Facilities of Subdivider. The City may require, as a
condition of approval of a subdivision, that the subdivider contract or finance the construction of
all or a portion of the Planned Drainage Facilities. If such a requirement is imposed, the
subdivider shall receive a credit against the fee imposed by this Ordinance in an amount equal to
the actual cost of construction, including incidental expenses, of the facilities as verified and
approved by the City Engineer. If the actual construction cost exceeds the amount of the fee
which would otherwise be imposed, the Subdivider may request to be reimbursed for the
difference from fees collected by the City. The reimbursement shall be made pursuant to a
reimbursement agreement entered into between the City and Subdivider.
SECTION VII.
Credit for Fees Previously Paid. Whenever a building permit is issued
for a development project property for which the fees established by this Ordinance were paid at
the time of receiving a parcel map or final map, or the Drainage Facilities were constructed by
the developer or subdivider of the property, a full credit for such payment of construction shall
be given against the fee due as a condition of the building permit.
SECTION VIII.
Applicability to Land Within County. For those areas of the Drainage
District within the County of San Diego, the following provisions shall apply:
A.Upon annexation to the City, this Ordinance shall immediately become applicable
to property located outside of the jurisdiction boundaries of the City on the date of
adoption of this Ordinance.
B.Pursuant to Section 66453 of the Government Code, the City Engineer shall file a
map of the Telegraph Canyon Drainage District with the County of San Diego,
and shall request that all subdivisions wholly or partially within the District be
referred to the City Engineer for a recommendation. The City Engineer shall
review each map for compliance with the Drainage Plan and shall recommend
such conditions or exactions which will ensure that any subdivision approved by
the County shall comply with the provisions of the Drainage Plan.
C.The City shall work with and encourage the County of San Diego to adopt the
Drainage Fee for the unincorporated area within the drainage basin.
SECTION IX.
Exemptions. The following development project is exempt from the
provisions of this Ordinance.
SECTION X.
Definitions.For the purpose of this Ordinance, the following words or
phrases shall be construed as defined in this Section, unless from the context, it appears that a
different meaning is intended.
A."Building permit" means a permit required by and issued pursuant to the Uniform
Building Code as adopted by reference by this City.
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 83
Ordinance
Page 5
B."Development project or development" means any activity described in Section
66000(a) of the Government Code and includes, but is not limited to, any activity
which results or may result in the physical alteration of land requiring a
subdivision map, zoning permit or approval or permit to build.
C."Drainage District" means the Telegraph Canyon Drainage District as described
in the Telegraph Canyon Drainage Plan, prepared by Willdan Associates and
approved by this Ordinance.
D."Drainage Improvement Benefit Area" means the Telegraph Canyon Drainage
Improvement Benefit Area described in the Telegraph Canyon Drainage Plan and
the Updated Nexus Study.
E."Drainage Plan" means the Telegraph Canyon Drainage Plan.
F."Planned Drainage Improvement" means the specific drainage improvements
described in the Drainage Plan.
SECTION XI.
Procedure for Fee Waiver or Reduction. Any developer who, because of
the nature or type of uses proposed for a development project, contends that application of the
fee imposed by this Ordinance is unconstitutional, or unrelated to purposes for which the fee is
imposed or to the burdens of the development, may apply to the City Council for a waiver or
reduction of the fee. The application shall be made in writing and filed with the City Clerk not
later than ten (l0) days after notice of the public hearing on the development permit application
for the project is given, or if no development permit i s required, at the time of filing of the bull
ding permit application. The application shall state in detail the factual basis for the claim of
waiver or reduction. The City Council shall consider the application within sixty (60) days after
its filing. The decision of the City Council shall be final. If a reduction or waiver is granted, any
change in use within the project shall subject the development to payment of the fee. The
procedure provided by this Section is additional to any other procedure authorized by law for
protesting or challenging the fee imposed by this Ordinance.
SECTION XII.
Authority. This Ordinance is adopted pursuant to the City's
constitutional and charter policy and taxing powers and pursuant to Government Code 66000,et
seq.
This ordinance shall be effective thirty (30) days after its adoption. Within fifteen (15)
days after its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this Ordinance to be published pursuant to the
provisions of City Charter Section 312.
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 84
City of Chula Vista
Staff Report
File#:15-0646, Item#: 4.
ORDINANCEOFTHECITYOFCHULAVISTAAMENDINGMUNICIPALCODESECTION20.04.50
-“BUSINESSRESOURCEANDENERGYEVALUATIONS,”STREAMLININGBUSINESSES’
REQUIREMENTSFORPARTICIPATIONINRESOURCEANDENERGYEVALUATIONS(FIRST
READING)
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Council place the ordinance on first reading.
SUMMARY
TheproposedamendmentstoChulaVistaMunicipalCode20.04.050 Businessresourceandenergy
evaluations(knowsastheFreeResourceandEnergyBusinessEvaluationProgramor“FREBE”)will
helpbusinesseswithstorefrontorofficelocationstoidentifyopportunitiestoconserveresourcesand
reducetheirmonthlyutilitycosts,notcreatinganimpedimenttotheparticipatingbusiness’sregular
operations.ThemodifiedimplementationwillaligntheCity’sprogramwiththeSDG&Eprogram,
Business Energy Solutions, which qualifies businesses to participate every five (5) years.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Environmental Notice
TheProjectqualifiesforaClass8CategoricalExemptionpursuanttoSection15308Actionsby
RegulatoryAgenciesforProtectionoftheEnvironmentoftheCaliforniaEnvironmentalQualityAct
State Guidelines.
Environmental Determination
TheDirectorofDevelopmentServiceshasreviewedtheproposedprojectforcompliancewiththe
CaliforniaEnvironmentalQualityAct(CEQA)andhasdeterminedthattheprojectqualifiesforaClass
8CategoricalExemptionpursuanttoSection15308\[ActionsbyRegulatoryAgenciesforProtection
oftheEnvironment\]ofthestateCEQAGuidelinesbecausetheproposalseekstoimplement
strategiesaimedatreducingenergyuseandlowerfossilfuelemissions.Thus,nofurther
environmental review is necessary.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
Not Applicable
DISCUSSION
In2009,CityCouncilapprovedanordinancethatmandatedbusinesses,throughtheannualbusiness
City of Chula VistaPage 1 of 4Printed on 1/21/2016
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 85
File#:15-0646, Item#: 4.
licensingprocess,participateinanenergyandwaterevaluationoftheirfacilitieseverythree(3)
years,theFreeResourceEnergyandBusinessEvaluationProgram(FREBE).Theno-costFREBE
programassistsbusinessesinloweringtheirmonthlyutilitycostsandsimultaneouslytheir
contributions to greenhouse gas emissions and climate change impacts.
Specifically,businessesoccupyingaphysicalstorefrontorofficeonacommercialutilitymeterare
required to participate in the evaluation program once every three (3) years.
StaffisrecommendingamendingChulaVistaMunicipalCodeChapter20.04.50-Businessresource
and energy evaluations - to require the evaluation once every five (5) years for the following reasons:
Almost all businesses in Chula Vista have gone through an evaluation since 2009.
20%ofthebusinesseshavetakenadvantageoftheSDG&EenergyefficiencyDirectInstall
programhavingtheirlightschangedatnocostwithmoreefficientones,andhaving
maintenance completed on their HVAC system.
SDG&E’snewBusinessEnergySolutionsprogramforenergyupgradesisallowedeveryfive
(5) years which allows for a better assessment of energy efficiency impacts over time.
Additionally,duringtheimplementationoftheFREBEprogram,somebusinesseshavebeenfinedfor
failuretocomply.InordertoalignwiththeEconomicDevelopmentDepartmentgoaltoprovidethe
bestpossiblecustomerservice,staffrecommendsremovingthefinecomponentoftheordinance.
Businesseswouldbesimplymandatedtoparticipateintheprogramwithnomonetaryenforcement,
but rather, monetary enticements in the form of energy savings and cost reduction.
The proposed modifications to the ordinance are as follows:
Chula Vista Municipal Code
Chapter 20.04.050 Business resource and energy evaluations.
AllcommercialandindustrialbusinessesintheCityofChulaVistaarerequiredtoparticipateinafree
resourceandenergyevaluationoftheirfacilitiestohelpthemidentifyenergyandwaterefficiencyand
conservationopportunitiesthatpotentiallyreduceparticipants’recurringutilitycostsand
correspondinggreenhousegasemissions.Evaluationsarerequiredwhenanewbusinesslicenseis
issuedandnotmorefrequentlythanonceeverythree five yearsorlessfrequentlythanonceevery
fiveyearsforarenewedbusinesslicense.BusinessesarerequiredtocooperatewithCitystaffor
theirdelegate(s)byproviding:(A)adateandtimefortheevaluationconvenientforthebusiness,(B)
accesstotheirfacilitiesfortheevaluationduringtheirregularbusinesshours,(C)authorizationto
reviewtheirhistoricalenergyandwaterusage,and(D)asignaturebythebusiness’son-site
representativeonacompletedevaluationformacknowledgingthatthebusinesshasreceiveda
completedevaluationandrelevantinformationaboutvoluntaryenergyandwaterefficiency
improvementopportunities.Businessesarenotrequiredtocompleteevaluationsforfacilityareas
beyondtheiroperationalcontrol.Theintentofthissectionistoprovidebusinesseswithano-cost
evaluation.
City of Chula VistaPage 2 of 4Printed on 1/21/2016
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 86
File#:15-0646, Item#: 4.
A.EvaluationNotificationProcess.Forexistinglicensedbusinesses,theCitywillsendawritten
noticenotmorethanonceeverythreefiveyearsthroughtheannualbusinesslicenserenewal
packagedistributedbyJanuary1st.Thenoticewillinformbusinessesoftheirevaluationrequirement
forthatcalendaryearandprovideinformationallowingthemtoscheduleanappointmentattheir
convenience.BusinesseswillberequiredtoscheduleanevaluationforthecalendaryearbyMarch
1st.Fornewlylicensedbusinesses,theCitywillsendawrittennotificationabouttheirevaluation
requirementforthatcalendaryearandshallprovidethemwiththecontactinformationneededto
scheduleanevaluationassessmentwithin60days.Ifanexistingornewlylicensedbusinessdoes
notsetanappointmentduringtheinitial60-dayschedulingperiod,theCityshallsetanevaluation
dateandtimeforthebusinessduringtheirregularbusinesshours.Ifdesired,thebusinessmay
rescheduletheevaluationappointmentforsometimeduringthatcalendaryearorthenext90days,
whichever is greater.
B.EvaluationDeliverables.Theevaluationfindings,providedtotheparticipatingbusinessonaform
establishedbytheCityManagerinconjunctionwiththelocalutilityandbusinessrepresentatives,
mayincludeachartoftheirhistoricalenergyandwaterconsumption,identifiedconservationand
efficiencyopportunities,potentialutilitycostsavingsandanestimateofthecorresponding
greenhousegasemissionreductions.Theassessmentmayalsoreviewalternativetransportation
andothersustainablepracticeswhichthebusinesscouldimplementand/orpromotetoitsemployees
andcustomersandanestimateoftheresultinggreenhousegasemissionreductions.TheCitymay
alsoprovideinformationandassistanceregardingfederal,stateandlocalrebateprogramsfor
efficiencyretrofitsandlow-costfinancingoptionstohelpreducethebusiness’stimeandcostof
implementingthevoluntarymeasures.TheCitymayalsoprovidecontactinformationforthelocal
utilities’accountandprogramstaffandutility-approvedChulaVistacontractorsthatmayprovide
services identified in the evaluation.
C.Enforcement.Businesseswhichdonotrespondtotheappointmentnotificationprocessand
provideaccessfortheon-siteevaluationshallbesentafollow-upnoticewitha30-dayopportunityto
cure.Unresponsivebusinesseswillbesentasecond30-dayremindernotice.Businesseswhichdo
notcooperateafterthesecondremindernoticewillbeassessedafinethatshallbesetintheMaster
FeeSchedule.Thefinewillbecollectableonthefollowingyear’sbusinesslicenseandincurasix
percentinterestrateperannum.Staffmayadministrativelyreduceoreliminateanyportionofthefine
foranybusinessthatcompletestheprocess.Failuretoparticipateintheassessmentprocessshall
notresultinthesuspensionofabusinesslicenseorpermittooccupythebusinesspremises.Any
finescollectedthroughordinanceenforcementwillbeappropriatedtoaBusinessConservationFund
whichwillbeusedtopurchasedevicestodistributetobusinessestohelpthemvoluntarilyreduce
their energy and water costs.
D.Exemptions.Homeoffices,mobilebusinessesandotherbusinessentitiesthatdonothavea
commercialutilitygasorelectricmeterareexempt.Businessesoccupyingafacilitywhichhashada
completedevaluationwithinatleastthreeyearsthroughtheCity’sprogramorthroughasimilar
energyauditprogram(SDG&EorotherCity-recognizedprogram)willbeexempt,includingfacilities
havingmultiplebusinesslicenses.TheCitywillalsoprovideanexemptiontobusinessesthat
participateinagreenhousegasemissionsreportingprogram(FederalEnvironmentalProtection
Agency,theClimateRegistry,orotherCity-recognizedprogram)orpossessacurrentCityofChula
VistaCLEANBusinesscertification.Finally,theCityshallgrantanybusinesswithanexemptionofat
leastthree five yearswhenoccupyingnewlyconstructedorremodeledfacilitiesthathavean
City of Chula VistaPage 3 of 4Printed on 1/21/2016
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 87
File#:15-0646, Item#: 4.
approvedTitle24EnergyEfficiencyReportwithitsbuildingplans.Theseexemptionsdonotpreclude
anylicensedbusinesswithacommercialelectricalorgasmeterfromrequestingafreeresourceand
energy evaluation at the business’s sole discretion.
DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT
Staffhasreviewedthedecisioncontemplatedbythisactionandhasdeterminedthatitisnotsite-
specificandconsequently,the500-footrulefoundinCaliforniaCodeofRegulationsTitle2,section
18705.2(a)(11),isnotapplicabletothisdecisionforpurposesofdeterminingadisqualifyingreal
property-relatedfinancialconflictofinterestunderthePoliticalReformAct(Cal.Gov’tCode..87100,
et seq.).
LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS
TheCity’sStrategicPlanhasfivemajorgoals:OperationalExcellence,EconomicVitality,Healthy
Community,StrongandSecureNeighborhoodsandaConnectedCommunity.TheFREBEProgram
andtheproposedmodificationstotheordinancesupporttheCity’sStrategicPlangoalsofHealthy
CommunityandOperationalExcellenceasstaffseekstoreducecommunityenergyuse,thereby
improvingairqualityandimprovingthebusinesses’customerserviceexperiencewiththeCity.
These modifications will help businesses take advantage of energy saving programs.
CURRENT YEAR FISCAL IMPACT
TheapprovaloftheordinancemodificationshasnocurrentyearimpactontheGeneralFund.The
activitiesrequiredunderthisordinancearefundedthroughtheCity’sLocalGovernmentPartnership
withSanDiegoGas&Electric(SDG&E)andtheCaliforniaPublicUtilitiesCommission(CPUC),
through 2021.
ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT
ThereisnoongoingimpacttotheGeneralFund.SDG&ELocalGovernmentPartnershipfundingwill
continue to support the program through 2021.
Staff Contact:Lynn France, Environmental Services Manager
City of Chula VistaPage 4 of 4Printed on 1/21/2016
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 88
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
AMENDING MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION20.04.50 BUSINESS RESOURCE AND
ENERGY EVALUATIONS,STREAMLINING BUSINESSES REQUIREMENTS FOR
PARTICIPATION IN RESOURCE AND ENERGY EVALUATIONS(FIRST READING)
WHEREAS, in 2009,City Council approved an ordinance that mandated
businesses participate in an energy and water evaluation of their facilities, the Free
Resource Energy and Business Evaluation Program (FREBE); and
WHEREAS, almost allbusinesses in Chula Vista have gone through an
evaluation and most have taken advantage of the SDG&E energy efficiency Direct
Install program, changing out lights and having heating and air conditioning system
upgrades; and
WHEREAS, SDG&Es new Business Energy Solutions program provides for
energy upgrades every five (5) years to allow for a truer assessmentof energy
efficiency impacts over time; and
WHEREAS, as the FREBE program provides businesses with access and
information to monetary enticements in the form of energy savings and cost reductions,
remove the potential of fines.
NOW THEREFORE the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does ordain as follows:
Section I.Code Amendment
Chula Vista Municipal Code Section 20.04.050 is amended to read as follows:
20.04.050 Business resource and energy evaluations.
All commercial and industrial businesses in the City of Chula Vista are required to
participate in a free resource and energy evaluation of their facilities to help them
identify energy and water efficiency and conservation opportunities that potentially
reduce participants’ recurring utility costs and corresponding greenhouse gas
emissions. Evaluations are required when a new business license is issued and not
more frequently than once every five years or less frequently than once every five years
for a renewed business license. Businesses are required to cooperate with City staff or
their delegate(s) by providing: (A) a date and time for the evaluation convenient for the
business, (B)access to their facilities for the evaluation during their regular business
hours, (C) authorization to review their historical energy and water usage, and (D) a
signature by the business’s on-site representative on a completed evaluation form
acknowledging that the business has received a completed evaluation and relevant
information about voluntary energy and water efficiency improvement opportunities.
Businesses are not required to complete evaluations for facility areas beyond their
C:\\Users\\GRANIC~1\\AppData\\Local\\Temp\\BCL Technologies\\easyPDF 7\\@BCL@C805193B\\@BCL@C805193B.doc
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 89
Ordinance
Page 2
operational control. The intent of this section is to provide businesses with a no-cost
evaluation.
A.Evaluation Notification Process. For existing licensed businesses, the City will send a
written notice not more than once every three years through the annual business
license renewal package distributed by January 1st. The notice will inform businesses of
their evaluation requirement for that calendar year and provide information allowing
them to schedule an appointment at their convenience. Businesses will be required to
schedule an evaluation for the calendar year by March 1st. For newly licensed
businesses, the City will send a written notification about their evaluation requirement
for that calendar year and shall provide them with the contact information needed to
schedule an evaluation assessment within 60 days. If an existing or newly licensed
business does not set an appointment during the initial 60-day scheduling period, the
City shall set an evaluation date and time for the business during their regular business
hours. If desired, the business may reschedule the evaluation appointment for some
time during that calendar year or the next 90 days, whichever is greater.
B.Evaluation Deliverables. The evaluation findings, provided to the participating
business on a formestablished by the City Manager in conjunction with the local utility
and business representatives, may include a chart of their historical energy and water
consumption, identified conservation and efficiency opportunities, potential utility cost
savings and an estimate of the corresponding greenhouse gas emission reductions.
The assessment may also review alternative transportation and other sustainable
practices which the business could implement and/or promote to its employees and
customers and an estimate of the resulting greenhouse gas emission reductions. The
City may also provide information and assistance regarding federal, state and local
rebate programs for efficiency retrofits and low-cost financing options to help reduce the
business’s time and cost of implementing the voluntary measures. The City may also
provide contact information for the local utilities’ account and program staff and utility-
approved Chula Vista contractors that may provide services identified in the evaluation.
C.Enforcement. Businesses which do not respond to the appointment notification
process and provide access for the on-site evaluation shall be sent a follow-up notice
with a 30-day opportunity to cure. Unresponsive businesses will be sent a second 30-
day reminder notice.
D.Exemptions. Home offices, mobile businesses and other business entities that do not
have a commercial utility gas or electric meter are exempt. Businesses occupying a
facility which has had a completed evaluation within at least three years through the
City’s program or through a similar energy audit program (SDG&E or other City-
recognized program) will be exempt, including facilities having multiple business
licenses. The City will also provide an exemption to businesses that participate in a
greenhouse gas emissions reporting program (Federal Environmental Protection
Agency, the Climate Registry, or other City-recognized program) or possess a current
City of Chula Vista CLEAN Business certification. Finally, the City shall grant any
business with anexemption of at least five years when occupying newly constructed or
remodeled facilities that have an approved Title 24 Energy Efficiency Report with its
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 90
Ordinance
Page 3
building plans. These exemptions do not preclude any licensed business with a
commercial electrical or gas meter from requesting a free resource and energy
evaluation at the business’s sole discretion.
Section II.Severability
If any portion of this Ordinance, or its application to any person or circumstance,
isfor any reason held to be invalid, unenforceable or unconstitutional, by a court of
competent jurisdiction, that portion shall be deemed severable, and such invalidity,
unenforceability or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the
remaining portions of the Ordinance, or its application to any other person or
circumstance. The City Council of the City of Chula Vista hereby declares that it would
have adopted each section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance, irrespective
of the fact that any one or more other sections, sentences, clauses or phrases of the
Ordinance be declared invalid, unenforceable or unconstitutional.
Section III. Construction
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista intends this Ordinance to supplement,
notto duplicate or contradict, applicable state and federal law and this Ordinance shall
be construed in light of that intent.
Section IV. Effective Date
This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force on the thirtieth day after its final
passage.
Section V. Publication
TheCity Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and
shall cause the same to be published or posted according to law.
Presented byApproved as to form by
______________________________________________
Eric CrockettGlen R. Googins
Economic Development DirectorCity Attorney
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 91
20.04.050 Business resource and energy evaluations.
All commercial and industrial businesses in the City of Chula Vista are required to participate in a free
resource and energy evaluation of their facilities to help them identify energy and water efficiency and
conservation opportunities that potentially reduce participants recurring utility costs and corresponding
greenhouse gas emissions. Evaluations are required when a new business license is issued and not
more frequently than once every three years or less frequently than once every threefiveyears for a
renewed business license. Businesses are required to cooperate with City staff or their delegate(s) by
providing: (A) a date and time for the evaluation convenient for the business, (B) access to their facilities
for the evaluation during their regular business hours, (C) authorization to review their historical energy
and water usage, and (D) a signature by the businesss on-site representative on a completed evaluation
form acknowledging that the business has received a completed evaluation and relevant information
about voluntary energy and water efficiency improvement opportunities. Businesses are not required to
complete evaluations for facility areas beyond their operational control. The intent of this section is to
provide businesses with a no-cost evaluation.
A.Evaluation Notification Process. For existing licensed businesses, the City will send a written notice not
more than once every three yearsfiveyearsthrough the annual business license renewal package
distributed by January 1st. The notice will inform businesses of their evaluation requirement for that
calendar year and provide information allowing them to schedule an appointment at their convenience.
Businesses will be required to schedule an evaluation for the calendar year by March 1st. For newly
licensed businesses, the City will send a written notification about their evaluation requirement for that
calendar year and shall provide them with the contact information needed to schedule an evaluation
assessment within 60 days. If an existing or newly licensed business does not set an appointment during
the initial 60-day scheduling period, the City shall set an evaluation date and time for the businessduring
their regular business hours. If desired, the business may reschedule the evaluation appointment for
some time during that calendar year or the next 90 days, whichever is greater.
B.Evaluation Deliverables. The evaluation findings, provided to theparticipating business on a form
established by the City Manager in conjunction with the local utility and business representatives, may
include a chart of their historical energy and water consumption, identified conservation and efficiency
opportunities, potential utility cost savings and an estimate of the corresponding greenhouse gas
emission reductions. The assessment may also review alternative transportation and other sustainable
practices which the business could implement and/or promote to its employees and customers and an
estimate of the resulting greenhouse gas emission reductions. The City may also provide information and
assistance regarding federal, state and local rebate programs for efficiency retrofits and low-cost
financing options to help reduce the businesss time and cost of implementing the voluntary measures.
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 92
The City may also provide contact information for the local utilities account and program staff and utility-
approved Chula Vista contractors that may provide services identifiedin the evaluation.
C.Enforcement. Businesses which do not respond to the appointment notification process and provide
access for the on-site evaluation shall be sent a follow-up notice with a 30-day opportunity to cure.
Unresponsive businesses will be sent a second 30-day reminder notice. Businesses which do not
cooperate after the second reminder notice will be assessednot be fined.a fine that shall be set in the
Master Fee Schedule. The fine will be collectable on the following years business license and incur a six
percent interest rate per annum. Staff may administratively reduce or eliminate any portion of the fine for
any business that completes the process. Failure to participate in the assessment process shall not result
in the suspension of a business license or permit to occupy the business premises. Any fines collected
through ordinance enforcement will be appropriated to a Business Conservation Fund which will be used
to purchase devices to distribute to businesses to help them voluntarily reduce their energy and water
costs.
D.Exemptions. Home offices, mobile businesses and other business entities that do not have a
commercial utility gas or electric meter are exempt. Businesses occupying a facility which has had a
completed evaluation within at least three fiveyears through the Citys program or through a similar
energy audit program (SDG&E or other City-recognized program) will be exempt, including facilities
having multiple business licenses. The City will also provide an exemption to businesses that participate
in a greenhouse gas emissions reporting program (Federal Environmental Protection Agency, the Climate
Registry, or other City-recognized program) or possess a current City of Chula Vista CLEAN Business
certification. Finally, the City shall grant any business with an exemption of at least three fiveyears when
occupying newly constructed or remodeled facilities that have an approved Title 24 Energy Efficiency
Report with its building plans. These exemptions do not preclude any licensed business with a
commercial electrical or gas meter from requesting a free resource and energy evaluation at the
businesss sole discretion. (Ord. 3145 §1, 2009; Ord. 3135 §1, 2009; Ord. 3119 §1, 2008).
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 93
City of Chula Vista
Staff Report
File#:15-0676, Item#: 5.
RESOLUTIONOFTHECITYCOUNCILOFTHECITYOFCHULAVISTAAPPROVINGTHE
AGREEMENTBETWEENTHECITYOFCHULAVISTAANDTHECALIFORNIAPRODUCT
STEWARDSHIPCOUNCIL(CPSC)ESTABLISHINGCOLLECTIONLOCATIONSFOR
HOUSEHOLDBATTERIESANDONE-POUNDGASCYLINDERS;WAIVINGTHECOMPETITIVE
BID REQUIREMENT AS ALLOWED PER CVMC 2.56.070B4 AND 2.56.090.B.2 AND B.3
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Council adopt the resolution.
SUMMARY
StaffrecommendsthatCouncilwaivethecompetitivebidrequirementandapprovetheagreement
betweenCaliforniaProductStewardshipCouncil(CPSC)andtheCityofChulaVista.CPSChasthe
uniqueexpertiseandperformancecapabilitiestoassistCitystaffindevelopingadditional,convenient
collection sites for household batteries and one-pound gas cylinders.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Environmental Notice
TheProjectqualifiesforaClass1CategoricalExemptionpursuanttoSection15301(Existing
Facilities) of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines.
Environmental Determination
TheDirectorofDevelopmentServiceshasreviewedtheproposedprojectforcompliancewiththe
CaliforniaEnvironmentalQualityAct(CEQA)andhasdeterminedthattheprojectqualifiesforaClass
1CategoricalExemptionpursuanttoSection15301(ExistingFacilities)oftheStateCEQA
Guidelines. Thus, no further environmental review is required.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
Not Applicable
DISCUSSION
TheCityofChulaVistaappliedforaCalRecycleGranttoimplementanewregionaloutreach
programtoencourageresidentstorecyclebatteriesandsmallgascylindersatretailandcommunity
locations.CalRecycleawardeda$90,000granttotheCityandCouncilacceptedthegrantand
appropriated the funds on August 18, 2015, (Resolution 2015-201).
StaffrequeststhatCouncilwaivethecompetitivebidrequirementandapprovetheagreementwith
CaliforniaProductStewardshipCouncil(CPSC)asCPSCwasapartnerontheoriginalgrant
applicationwhichmadetheproposedprojectviabletoCalRecycle.CPSChastheexpertiseand
performancecapabilitiestoassistCitystaffindevelopingadditional,convenient,collectionsitesfor
City of Chula VistaPage 1 of 2Printed on 1/21/2016
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 94
File#:15-0676, Item#: 5.
householdbatteriesandone-poundgascylindersduetotheirextensiveknowledge,experience,and
corporaterelationshipinTehama,Mariposa,SantaCruz,andSanBenitocountiesandthecitiesof
OakGrove,MountainView,PaloAltoandSunnyvale,developingretail“take-back”collectionsitesfor
theseproducts.CPSChasdevelopedcontactsandrelationshipswiththeretailsites(andtheir
regional/corporateoffices)wherecollectionprogramcollectioncontainerswillbeestablished.Chula
VistaiscapitalizingonCPSC’sexperienceandexpertisedevelopedandutilizedbytheseother
jurisdictionstoprovideChulaVistaresidentswithadditional,convenientdrop-offlocationsinaddition
totheHouseholdHazardousWasteDrop-offFacilitylocatedattheCity’sPublicWorksYard,1800
Maxwell Road, Chula Vista, 91911.
CPSChaspreparedmultiplemulti-mediapromotionalcampaignstoencourageparticipationand
properdisposalutilizingprint,TV,radio,socialandothermediafromtheirworkwithother
jurisdictionswhichwillbecustomizedforChulaVista.CPSCwillcollectdata,performsitemonitoring
and prepare grant reports.
DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT
Staffhasreviewedthedecisioncontemplatedbythisactionandhasdeterminedthatitisnotsite-
specificandconsequently,the500-footrulefoundinCaliforniaCodeofRegulationsTitle2,section
18705.2(a)(11)isnotapplicabletothisdecisionforthepurposeofdeterminingadisqualifyingreal
property-relatedfinancialconflictofinterestunderthePoliticalReformAct(Cal.Gov’tCode§87100,
etseq.)Staffisnotindependentlyaware,andhasnotbeeninformedbyanyCouncilmember,ofany
other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter.
LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS
TheCity’sStrategicPlanhasfivemajorgoals:OperationalExcellence,EconomicVitality,Healthy
Community,StrongandSecureNeighborhoodsandaConnectedCommunity.ThisHousehold
HazardousWasteGrantProgramsupportstheCity’sHealthyCommunitygoalbyproviding
additional,convenient,andappropriaterecyclinganddisposaloptionsforbatteriesandsmallgas
cylinders in addition to the Household Hazardous Waste Drop-off Facility at the Public Works Yard.
CURRENT YEAR FISCAL IMPACT
ApprovalofthiscontractwillhavenocurrentyearfiscalimpacttotheGeneralFundasthe$70,725is
fundedbygrantsandtheEnvironmentalServicesfund.Allgrantactivitieswillbefullyfunded
throughout the term of the Agreement and will not require General Fund appropriations.
ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT
Therewillbenoon-goingfiscalimpacttotheGeneralFundasaresultofthiswork.Fundingforthis
workwillbecoveredbytheHouseholdHazardousWasteGrantProgramFiscalYear2015-16and
the Environmental Services fund.
ATTACHMENTS
CPSC contract
Staff Contact:Lynn France, Environmental Services Manager (619) 585-5790
City of Chula VistaPage 2 of 2Printed on 1/21/2016
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 95
RESOLUTION NO. __________
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
APPROVING THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY AND CALIFORNIA PRODUCT
STEWARDSHIP COUNCIL (CPSC) ESTABLISHING COLLECTION LOCATIONSFOR
HOUSEHOLD BATTERIES AND ONE-POUND GAS CYLINDERS;WAIVINGTHE
COMPETITIVE BID REQUIREMENT AS ALLOWED PER CVMC 2.56.070.B.4 AND
2.56.090.B.2 AND B.3
et seq.
WHEREAS, California Public Resources Code sections 40000 authorizes
theDepartment of Resources and Recovery (CalRecycle) to administer various grant
programs in furtherance of the State of Californias efforts to reduce, recycle and reuse
solid waste generated in the State thereby preserving landfill capacity and protecting
public health and safety and the environment; and
WHEREAS,The City of Chula Vista received CalRecycle Grantof $90,000to
implement a new regional outreach program to encourage residents to recycle batteries
and single-use small propane gas cylinders at retail sites; and
WHEREAS,The City of Chula Vista developed thisgrant proposal with the
assistance of the California Product Stewardship Council (CPSC) using data and
projections used in other successful grant programs administered by CPSC; and
WHEREAS, CPSC has the unique expertise and performance capabilities due to
their extensive knowledge and proven success to developother retail take-back
programsfor batteries and single-use small propane gas cylinders throughout California
in jurisdictions of similar size and demographics to Chula Vistaand the Citys best
interests would be better served by selecting CPSC as the contractor to perform the
services needed.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula
Vista, that it approves the agreement between City of Chula Vista and California
Product Stewardship Council for $70,725, intheform presented, with such minor
modifications as may be required or approved by the City Attorney, a copy of which
,
shall be kepton file in the Office of the Cityand authorizesand directsthe Mayorto
executesame; and waivesthe competitive bid requirement, pursuant to CVMC sections
2.56.070. B.4 and 2.56.090.B.2,and B.3.
PresentedbyApproved as to form by
EricCrockettGlen R. Googins
EconomicDevelopment DirectorCity Attorney
C:\\Users\\GRANIC~1\\AppData\\Local\\Temp\\BCL Technologies\\easyPDF 7\\@BCL@6405B0C3\\@BCL@6405B0C3.docx
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 96
C:\\Users\\GRANIC~1\\AppData\\Local\\Temp\\BCL Technologies\\easyPDF 7\\@BCL@6405B0C3\\@BCL@6405B0C3.docx
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 97
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 98
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 99
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 100
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 101
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 102
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 103
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 104
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 105
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 106
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 107
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 108
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 109
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 110
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 111
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 112
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 113
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 114
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 115
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 116
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 117
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 118
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 119
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 120
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 121
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 122
City of Chula Vista
Staff Report
File#:15-0688, Item#: 6.
RESOLUTIONOFTHECITYCOUNCILOFTHECITYOFCHULAVISTAAPPROVINGAN
AGREEMENTINTHEAMOUNTOF$150,000BETWEENTHECITYOFCHULAVISTAANDTHE
CENTERFORSUSTAINABLEENERGY(CSE)FORSUPPORTINIMPLEMENTINGTHECITYOF
CHULA VISTA’S SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES PROGRAM
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Council adopt the resolution.
SUMMARY
Staffhaspreparedatwo-partyagreementwiththeCenterforSustainableEnergy(CSE)forsupport
inimplementingtheCityofChulaVista’sSustainableCommunitiesProgram.Thepurposeofthe
agreementistoperformavarietyoftasks,suchaseducationandtrainingforstaffandforthe
developmentcommunity,codecoaching,secondaryinspectionsandinspectionsupportservices.
Theseeffortswillpromoteenergyefficiencyandreducedgreenhousegasemissionsaspartofthe
planning and building process.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Environmental Notice
Theactivityisnota“Project”asdefinedunderSection15378oftheCaliforniaEnvironmentalQuality
ActStateGuidelines;therefore,pursuanttoStateGuidelinesSection15060(c)(3)noenvironmental
review is required.
Environmental Determination
TheproposedactivityhasbeenreviewedforcompliancewiththeCaliforniaEnvironmentalQuality
Act(CEQA)andithasbeendeterminedthattheactivityisnota“Project”asdefinedunderSection
15378oftheStateCEQAGuidelinesbecauseitwillnotresultinaphysicalchangeinthe
environment;therefore,pursuanttoSection15060(c)(3)oftheStateCEQAGuidelines,theactivity
is not subject to CEQA. Thus, no environmental review is required.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
Not Applicable.
DISCUSSION
TheCityispartofaLocalGovernmentPartnership(LGP)withSanDiegoGas&Electric(SDGE)to
promoteenergyefficiencyinChulaVista.AspartoftheLGP,theCityofChulaVistaestablisheda
SustainableCommunitiesProgramin2009,toinvestigateandupdateexistingprograms,guidelines
andregulationstoreflecttheadvancesthathavebeenmadeinbothgreenbuildingandenergy
conservationforbuildingsaswellascommunity-andproject-levelsiteplanningconsiderations.
Becausetechnologiesandstandardsareconstantlyevolving,theCity’sSCPalsoemphasizes
City of Chula VistaPage 1 of 3Printed on 1/21/2016
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 123
File#:15-0688, Item#: 6.
ongoingeducationandsupportforstaff,developersandpermitapplicants.TheCityenteredintoan
agreementwithSDGEforthe2016fundingcycle,withcertaingoalsandobjectivesforits
Sustainable Communities Program.
Qualifications
DuetoCSE’suniquequalificationsandenergyefficiencyexpertise,theCityofChulaVista
accomplishedthefollowingin2015:Fifteen(15)trainingsonvariousenergyefficiencytopics(trained
over200attendees);providedone-on-onesupportforenergyefficientdesigntostaffandtothe
developmentcommunity;anddevelopededucationaltoolssuchasenergycodeandgreenbuilding
codecorrectionlists,checklists,andwebsiteupdates.Basedonthisuniqueexperience,resultingin
theCity`sinterestsbeingmateriallybetterservedbycontinuingitspartnershipwithCSE,withinthe
meaningofChulaVistaMunicipalCodesection2.56.070(B)(3)and(4),theCenterforSustainable
EnergyhasbeenselectedtocontinueassistingtheCityinitsSustainableCommunitieseffortsfor
2016.
Scope of Work
ThefollowingsummarizestheproposedscopeofworktobeperformedbytheCSEteam,in
accordance with the LGP agreement:
· Training of staff and development community
· Code coaching and Sustainability Desk staffing
· Secondary inspections and inspection support for Energy Code compliance
DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT
Staffhasreviewedthedecisioncontemplatedbythisactionandhasdeterminedthatitisnotsite-
specificandconsequently,the500-footrulefoundinCaliforniaCodeofRegulationsTitle2,section
18702.2(a)(11),isnotapplicabletothisdecisionforpurposesofdeterminingadisqualifyingreal
property-relatedfinancialconflictofinterestunderthePoliticalReformAct(Cal.Gov'tCode§87100,
et seq.).
Staffisnotindependentlyaware,andhasnotbeeninformedbyanyCityCouncilmember,ofany
other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter.
LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS
TheCity’sStrategicPlanhasfivemajorgoals:OperationalExcellence,EconomicVitality,Healthy
Community,StrongandSecureNeighborhoodsandaConnectedCommunity.Implementationofthe
SCPsupportstheHealthyCommunitygoal,astheSCPseekstopromoteenergyefficiencyand
reducegreenhousegasemissionsbyinfusingsustainablepracticesintotheplanningandbuilding
process.
CURRENT YEAR FISCAL IMPACT
ThereisnonetfiscalimpacttotheGeneralFundresultingfromtheproposedagreement.Thecost
fortheproposedscopeofworkis$150,000.ThefundsfortheSustainableCommunitiesProgram
havebeenappropriatedandareprovidedthroughtheLocalGovernmentPartnershipwithSDGE;
staff has confirmed that the proposed work is an eligible expense under the Partnership Agreement.
ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT
City of Chula VistaPage 2 of 3Printed on 1/21/2016
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 124
File#:15-0688, Item#: 6.
There is no ongoing fiscal impact to the General Fund.
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment 1 - Two-Party Agreement with CSE
Attachment 2 - Resolution for CSE Agreement
Staff Contact: Janice Kluth, Permit Counter Manager, Development Services Department
City of Chula VistaPage 3 of 3Printed on 1/21/2016
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 125
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 126
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 127
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 128
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 129
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 130
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 131
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 132
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 133
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 134
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 135
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 136
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 137
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 138
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 139
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 140
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 141
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 142
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 143
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 144
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 145
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 146
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 147
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 148
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 149
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 150
RESOLUTION NO. __________
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING AN AGREEMENT IN THE
AMOUNT OF$150,000 BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA AND THE CENTER FOR SUSTAINABLE ENERGY
(CSE) FOR SUPPORT IN IMPLEMENTING THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTAS SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES
PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the Cityof Chula Vista participates in a Local Government
Partnership(LGP) with San Diego Gas and Electric (SDGE) to promote energy
efficiency in the City ofChula Vista,and a portion of the LGP activities focus on
Sustainable Communities; and
WHEREAS, the Cityentered into an agreement with SDGE for the 2016LGP
funding cycle, with certain goals and objectives for its Sustainable Communities
Program; and
WHEREAS, due to energy efficiency-related code changesand an increasein
economic activity, the City hired a consultant to supportthe implementation of its SCP
goals and objectives; and
WHEREAS, the Center for Sustainable Energy( CSE) responded to a Request
forProposals and was selected in 2014, for the purpose of assisting the Cityin
implementing itsSustainable Communities Program ( 2014-5); and
WHEREAS, due to CSE's unique qualifications and energyefficiency expertise,
the City accomplished the following in 2015: Fifteen (15)trainingsonvarious energy
efficiency topics(trained over 200 attendees); provided one-on-one support for energy
efficient design to staff andto the development community;and developed educational
tools such as energy code and greenbuilding code correction lists,checklists,and
website updates. Based on this unique experience, resulting in the City`s interests
being materially better served by continuingits partnership withCSE, within the
meaningof Chula Vista Municipal Code section 2.56.070( B)(3) and (4), theCenter for
Sustainable Energy has been selected to continue assisting the Cityin its Sustainable
Communities efforts for 2016;and
WHEREAS, the cost for the proposed scope of work is approximately $150,000;
and
WHEREAS, the Agreement, a copy of whichis on file in the City Clerks Office,
will not impact the City' s General Fund, since these fundsarean eligible expense
under the Local Government Partnership and will be fullyreimbursed;and
C:\\Users\\GRANIC~1\\AppData\\Local\\Temp\\BCL Technologies\\easyPDF 7\\@BCL@C4051FFC\\@BCL@C4051FFC.doc
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 151
Resolution No.
Page 2
WHEREAS, the project qualifies for an Exemption pursuant to Section 15061
(b)(3) of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines; and
WHEREAS, Consultant warrantsand represents that it is experienced and
staffed in amanner such that it can deliver the services required of Consultant to City in
accordance with thetime frames and the terms and conditions of the Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula
Vista, that it finds the recitals to be true and correct and approves the Resolution of the
City Council of the City of Chula Vista approving a $150,000 agreement between the
City and the Center for Sustainable Energy (CSE) for support in implementing the City
of Chula Vistas Sustainable Communities Program, insubstantially the form presented,
with such minor modifications as may be required or approved by the City Attorney, a
copy of which shall be kepton file in the Office of the City Clerk,and authorizesand
directsthe Mayor or her designeeto execute same.
Presented byApproved as to form by
Kelly G. Broughton, FASLAGlen R. Googins
Director of Development ServicesCity Attorney
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 152
City of Chula Vista
Staff Report
File#:16-0007, Item#: 7.
RESOLUTIONOFTHECITYCOUNCILOFTHECITYOFCHULAVISTAAMENDINGTHEFISCAL
YEAR2015/2016OTHERGRANTSFUNDBUDGETBYAPPROPRIATING$34,290TOACCEPTA
GRANT FROM ROY AND MARIAN HOLLEMAN FOUNDATION (4/5 VOTE REQUIRED)
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Council adopt the resolution.
SUMMARY
TheAnimalCareFacilityreceivedagrantintheamountof$34,290fromtheRoyandMarian
HollemanFoundationThesefundswillbeusedtoimproveon-sitesafetyforanimalsandstaff,
finalizeimprovementstoemergencystorage,andimprovedogkennelsbyconvertingtwoadjacent
areas to accommodate dog wash and food preparation functions.
Staffrequeststhat$34,290beappropriatedtotheSuppliesandServicesbudgetoftheAnimalCare
Facility Department budget; this appropriation will be fully offset by grant revenue.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Environmental Notice
Theactivityisnota“Project”asdefinedunderSection15378oftheCaliforniaEnvironmentalQuality
ActStateGuidelines;therefore,pursuanttoStateGuidelinesSection15060(c)(3)noenvironmental
review is required.
Environmental Determination
TheDevelopmentServicesDirectorhasreviewedtheproposedactivityforcompliancewiththe
CaliforniaEnvironmentalQualityAct(CEQA)andhasdeterminedthattheactivityisnota“Project”as
definedunderSection15378(b)(5)oftheStateCEQAGuidelinesbecauseitwillnotresultina
physicalchangeintheenvironment;therefore,pursuanttoSection15060(c)(3)oftheStateCEQA
Guidelines, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Thus, no environmental review is necessary.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
Not Applicable
DISCUSSION
Followingmulti-yearexpansionsoftheCattery,Cottage,andartificially-turfedexerciseyards,staff
attentionhasfocusedonfacilitysecurityandsafetywhentransportinganimals.Self-closinggates
and an emergency storage container will assist both areas.
DogsenteringtheACFareoftenlost,abandonedorhavenotbeenwellcaredfor.Currently,when
City of Chula VistaPage 1 of 2Printed on 1/21/2016
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 153
File#:16-0007, Item#: 7.
dogsarebathed,staffusesasmallsinkinagroomingareaoracinderblockshowerarea.The
currentgroomingroomisinconvenientlylocatedandnotconduciveforitspurpose.Convertingone
areaadjacenttoakennelbaytoadogwashincludesaddingadog-washtub,easystaffaccessto
appropriateshampoos,cleantowelsandfloorcoveringintendedtominimizeslipping.Theresultwill
be greater efficiency for staff and increased comfort for dogs.
Convertingasecondareaadjacenttoanotherdogbaywillimprovefoodpreparationandincrease
sanitation.
DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT
Staffhasreviewedthedecisioncontemplatedbythisactionandhasdeterminedthatitisnotsite-
specificandconsequently,the500-footrulefoundinCaliforniaCodeofRegulationsTitle2,section
18702.2(a)(11),isnotapplicabletothisdecisionforpurposesofdeterminingadisqualifyingreal
property-relatedfinancialconflictofinterestunderthePoliticalReformAct(Cal.Gov'tCode§87100,
et seq.).
Staffisnotindependentlyaware,andhasnotbeeninformedbyanyCityCouncilmember,ofany
other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter.
LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS
TheCity’sStrategicPlanhasfivemajorgoals:OperationalExcellence,EconomicVitality,Healthy
Community, Strong and Secure Neighborhoods and a Connected Community.
Supportsoperationalexcellencebyimprovingon-sitesafetyforanimalsandstaff,finalizing
improvementstoemergencystorage,andimprovingdogkennelsbyconvertingtwoadjacentareasto
accommodate dog wash and food preparation functions.
CURRENT YEAR FISCAL IMPACT
ThereisnonetfiscalimpacttotheGeneralFund.Approvaloftheresolutionwillresultin
appropriation of $34,290 to the Other Grants Fund Budget.
ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT
There is no ongoing fiscal impact.
ATTACHMENTS
None
Staff Contact: Mariya G. Anton, Animal Care Administrator
City of Chula VistaPage 2 of 2Printed on 1/21/2016
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 154
RESOLUTION NO. 2016-
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2015/16
OTHER GRANTS FUND BUDGET BY APPROPRIATING
$34,290 TO ACCEPT A GRANT FROM ROY AND MARIAN
HOLLEMAN FOUNDATION
WHEREAS, in October 2015the Chula Vista Animal Care Facility applied for a grant
and was awarded a grant from the Roy and Marian Holleman Foundation; and
WHEREAS, the Animal Care Facility will use these funds to improve on-site safety for
animals and staff; and
WHEREAS, the Animal Care Facility will be able to finalize improvements to
emergency storage, and improve dog kennelsto accommodate dog wash and food preparation
functions.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Chula
Vista approves an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2015/16 Other Grants Fund Budget by
appropriating $34,290 to the Supplies and Servicesexpense category to be offset by grant
funding.
Presented byApproved as to form by
_________________________________________________________________________
MariyaG.AntonGlen R. Googins
Animal Care Facility AdministratorCity Attorney
C:\\Users\\GRANIC~1\\AppData\\Local\\Temp\\BCL Technologies\\easyPDF 7\\@BCL@500603CA\\@BCL@500603CA.doc
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 155
City of Chula Vista
Staff Report
File#:16-0005, Item#: 8.
CONSIDERATIONOFAMENDINGCHAPTER19.02OFTHECHULAVISTAMUNICIPALCODE
TO AFFIRM PERMISSIVE ZONING AND CLARIFY PROHIBITED USES
A.EMERGENCYORDINANCEOFTHECITYOFCHULAVISTAAMENDINGCHAPTER19.02OF
THECHULAVISTAMUNICIPALCODETOAFFIRMPERMISSIVEZONINGPRINCIPLESANDTO
CLARIFYTHATUSESPROHIBITEDELSEWHEREINTHEMUNICIPALCODEAREALSO
PROHIBITED LAND USES (4/5 VOTE REQUIRED)
B.ORDINANCEOFTHECITYOFCHULAVISTAAMENDINGCHAPTER19.02OFTHECHULA
VISTAMUNICIPALCODETOAFFIRMPERMISSIVEZONINGPRINCIPLESANDTOCLARIFY
THATUSESPROHIBITEDELSEWHEREINTHEMUNICIPALCODEAREALSOPROHIBITED
LAND USES (FIRST READING)
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Councilconductthepublichearing,adoptemergencyordinance(A),andplaceordinance(B)onfirst
reading.
SUMMARY
Underrecentlyenactedstatelaw,unlesslocaljurisdictionsenactrulesgoverningthecultivationof
medicalmarijuanabyMarch1,2016,statelawswillpreemptlocallawsinthisarea.Consistentwith
previousCityCouncilaction,thisitemclarifiesasamatterofcityzoninglawsthatmedicalmarijuana
cultivationandanyandallotherprohibitedandnotexpresslyallowedusesarenotpermittedwithin
theCity.ThisactionbothclarifiestheCity’sexistinglawsandavoidsanyargumentthatstatelaws
st
willpreemptCitylawsinthisareastartingonMarch1.ThisactiondoesnotpreventtheCityfrom
changing its own laws at a later date.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Environmental Notice
Theactivityisnota“Project”asdefinedunderSection15378oftheCaliforniaEnvironmentalQuality
ActStateGuidelines;therefore,pursuanttoStateGuidelinesSection15060(c)(3)noenvironmental
reviewisrequired.Notwithstandingtheforegoing,theactivityqualifiesforanExemptionpursuantto
Section 15061(b)(3) of the California Environmental Quality Act State Guidelines.
Environmental Determination
TheproposedactivityhasbeenreviewedforcompliancewiththeCaliforniaEnvironmentalQuality
Act(CEQA)andithasbeendeterminedthattheactivityisnota“Project”asdefinedunderSection
15378ofthestateCEQAGuidelinesbecauseitwillnotresultinaphysicalchangeinthe
environment;therefore,pursuanttoSection15060(c)(3)oftheStateCEQAGuidelines,theactivityis
notsubjecttotheCEQA.Notwithstandingtheforegoingithasalsobeendeterminedthatthereisno
City of Chula VistaPage 1 of 4Printed on 1/21/2016
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 156
File#:16-0005, Item#: 8.
possibilitythattheactivitymayhaveasignificanteffectontheenvironment;therefore,pursuantto
Section15061(b)(3)oftheStateCEQAGuidelines,theactivityisnotsubjecttotheCEQA.Thus,no
environmental review is required.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
ThisitemwenttothePlanningCommissiononJanuary13,2016forarecommendationforapproval.
ThePlanningCommissionapproved,witha5-0-1vote,aresolutionrecommendingapprovalofthe
ordinances.Toreviewtheapprovedresolution,pleaseseePlanningCommissionResolutionMPA16-
0001 attached.
DISCUSSION
SincethevotersoftheStateofCaliforniaapprovedProposition215in1996,seriouslyillCalifornians,
underthecareofaphysician,havebeengrantedlimitedcriminalimmunityfromstateprosecutionfor
thepossession,use,andcultivationofmedicalmarijuana.Localgovernments,however,have
maintainedpolicepowersundertheCaliforniaConstitutiontoregulateorprohibitthesale,
distribution, or cultivation of medical marijuana within their respective jurisdictions.
TheChulaVistaCityCouncilconsideredandadoptedOrdinance3204onSeptember20,2011,
whichprohibitstheoperationofmedicalmarijuanadispensariesandthecultivationofmedical
marijuanawithintheCity.Inconsideringadoptionoftheordinance,theCityCouncilreviewedthe
PublicSafetySubcommitteerecommendation,staffpresentations,andpublicinput.Attheconclusion
ofthisreview,theCityCouncilexpressedadesireto:1)preventthenegativesecondaryeffects
associatedwithmedicalmarijuanafacilities,suchasincreasedcrime,loitering,andunderage
access;and2)protecttheabilityofseriouslyillpatientstoaccessmedicalmarijuana.Ordinance
3204accomplishesthesegoalsbyenactingChapter5.66oftheChulaVistaMunicipalCode.For
furtherexplanationofCityCouncilaction,pleaseseeCityCouncilOrdinance3204(adopted
September 20, 2011) and City Council Agenda Statement Item 14 (September 13, 2011) attached.
Chapter5.66iscontainedwithintheBusinessLicenses,TaxesandRegulationssectionofthe
MunicipalCodeandprohibitsfixedfacilitiesfromdispensing,selling,orcultivatingmedicalmarijuana;
specificprovisionsexemptfacilitiestraditionallyassociatedwithmedicalandresidentialcarefromthe
Chapter.
SinceOrdinance3204wasapproved,Californiacourtshaveissueddecisionsin CityofRiversidev.
InlandEmpirePatientsHealthandWellnessCenter,Inc.and Maralv.CityofLiveOak affirmingthat
citiesdohavetheauthoritytobanbothmedicalmarijuanadispensariesandthecultivationofmedical
marijuana under the police powers granted to them in the California Constitution.
StaffisnowrecommendingthatCityCouncilamendTitle19inresponsethenewlyenactedMedical
MarijuanaRegulationandSafetyAct(the“Act”).TheAct,whichbecameeffectiveonJanuary1,
2016,providesnewandcomprehensiveregulationoverthecultivation,processing,transporting,
testinganddistributionofmedicalcannabis(i.e.,marijuana)toqualifiedpatientsunderadualstate-
locallicensingscheme.However,theActcontainsanewstatutoryprovisioninHealth&SafetyCode
section11362.777(c)(4)thatrequireslocalgovernmentstohavelanduseregulationsorordinances
City of Chula VistaPage 2 of 4Printed on 1/21/2016
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 157
File#:16-0005, Item#: 8.
regulatingorprohibitingcultivationofmedicalmarijuana,eitherexpresslyorundertheprinciplesof
permissivezoning,priortoMarch1,2016.Intheeventthatalocalgovernmentdoesnothavethe
applicableregulation,ordinance,orexpresszoningprinciplepriortoMarch1,2016,thestatewill
becomethesolelicensingauthorityformedicalmarijuanacultivationapplicantsinthatlocal
jurisdiction.InresponsetoconcernfromtheLeagueofCaliforniaCitiesandotherentities,California
AssemblyMemberWoodhasintroducedAssemblyBill21,whichwoulddeletetheprovisionthat
grantsthestatesolelicensingauthorityunderthosecircumstances;however,AB21hasnotyet
passed the Senate and the deadline for local jurisdictions remains in place.
AlthoughtheCityofChulaVistacurrentlyprohibitsthecultivationofmedicalmarijuanainits
BusinessLicenseandRegulationtitle,itdoesnotexplicitlyprohibitthecultivationofmarijuanaasa
landuseinTitle19,itszoningcode.BecauseHealth&SafetyCodesection11362.777(c)(4)requires
a landuse regulationorordinanceregulatingorprohibitingcultivationofmarijuana,staffis
recommendingthatChapter19.02beamendedtoclarifythatactionsprohibitedelsewhereinthe
Municipal Code, such as the cultivation of marijuana, are also prohibited as a land use under Title 19.
Inaddition,becausetheCity’szoningcodehastraditionallyoperatedundertheprincipalsof
permissivezoning,staffisrecommendingthatChapter19.02beamendedtoexplicitlyaffirmsuchin
lightofthenewlegislationandpendingdeadline.A“permissivezoning”codehasbeendefinedby
theCaliforniaCourtsofAppealin CityofCoronav.Naulls and CityofMontereyv.Carrnshimba asa
zoningcodethatoperatestoprohibitanynon-permitteduse.Suchamendmentwouldaffirmthat
because the cultivation of medical marijuana is not permitted as a land use, it is therefore prohibited.
TheseproposedamendmentstoChapter19.02maintainthestatusquoandareintendedtosecure
theCity’sfuturepowertoregulateorbanthecultivationofmarijuanawithinitsjurisdiction.Although
theCitycurrentlyprohibitsthecultivationofmedicalmarijuana,suchamendmentswillprotectthe
City’s ability to maintain or change its laws regarding cultivation at a later date.
DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT
Staffhasreviewedthedecisioncontemplatedbythisactionandhasdeterminedthatitisnotsite
specificandconsequentlythe500footrulefoundinCaliforniaCodeofRegulationsTitle2,section
18702.2(a)(11)isnotapplicabletothisdecisionforpurposeofdeterminingadisqualifyingreal
property-relatedfinancialconflictofinterestunderthePoliticalReformAct(Cal.Gov.Codesection
87100,et seq.).
Staffisnotindependentlyaware,andhasnotbeeninformedbyanyPlanningCommissionmember,
of any other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter.
LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS
TheCity’sStrategicPlanhasfivemajorgoals:OperationalExcellence,EconomicVitality,Healthy
Community,StrongandSecureNeighborhoodsandaConnectedCommunity.Theamendmentto
Title19supportstheOperationalExcellenceandStrongandSecureNeighborhoodsgoalsasit
seekstoclarifytheCity'szoningcodeandtomaintainlocaljurisdictionoverthecultivationof
City of Chula VistaPage 3 of 4Printed on 1/21/2016
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 158
File#:16-0005, Item#: 8.
marijuana in the City.
CURRENT YEAR FISCAL IMPACT
The subject amendment to Title 19 results in no current year fiscal impact to the City.
ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT
The subject amendment to Title 19 results in no ongoing fiscal impact to the City.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Planning Commission Resolution No. MPA16-0001
2. City Council Agenda Statement Item 14 (September 13, 2011)
3. City Council Ordinance 3204 (adopted September 20, 2011)
4. City Council Emergency Ordinance (Version A) No. XXXX
5. City Council Ordinance (Version B) No. XXXX
Staff Contact: Megan McClurg
City of Chula VistaPage 4 of 4Printed on 1/21/2016
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 159
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 160
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 161
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 162
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 163
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 164
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 165
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 166
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 167
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 168
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 169
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 170
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 171
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 172
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 173
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 174
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 175
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 176
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 177
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 178
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 179
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 180
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 181
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 182
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 183
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 184
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 185
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 186
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 187
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 188
ORDINANCE NO._______________
AN EMERGENCY ORDINANCEOF THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTAAMENDING CHAPTER 19.02 OF THE CHULA
VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE TO AFFIRM PERMISSIVE
ZONING PRINCIPLES AND TO CLARIFY THAT USES
PROHIBITED ELSEWHERE IN THE MUNICIPAL CODE
ARE ALSO PROHIBITED LAND USES
WHEREAS, the impetus for this subject amendment to Municipal Code Chapter 19.02
stems from the state laws governing medical marijuana; and
WHEREAS,on October 9, 2015, Governor Jerry Brown signed the “Medical Marijuana
Regulation andSafety Act” (the “Act”), which is comprised of the state legislative bills known
as AB 243, AB 266, and SB 643, into law; and
WHEREAS, the Act becomes effective January 1, 2016 and contains provisions that
govern the cultivating, processing, transporting, testing, and distributing of medical cannabis
(i.e., marijuana) to qualified patients; and
WHEREAS, the Act states that a local government that wishes to prevent marijuana
cultivation, as defined in the Business and Professions Code section 19300.5(l), must have a land
use regulation or ordinance regulating or prohibiting the cultivation of marijuana, either
expressly or otherwise under the principles of permissive zoning, prior to March 1, 2016 to retain
jurisdiction over such cultivation (Health and Safety Code 11362.777(c)(4)); and
WHEREAS, the Chula Vista Municipal Code expressly prohibits the cultivation of
medical marijuana in Title 5, section 5.66.020; and
WHEREAS, the Chula Vista Municipal Code in Title 19 operates as a permissive zoning
code, whereby uses not expressly permitted are prohibited; and
WHEREAS, it is necessary that this Emergency Ordinance be immediately enacted to
ensure that the City of Chula Vista meets the March 1, 2016 deadline required to maintain
jurisdiction over the cultivation of marijuana under state law; and
WHEREAS, the Director of Development Services has reviewed the proposed project for
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the
activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the state CEQA Guidelines because
it will not result in a physical change in the environment; therefore, pursuant to Section
15060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the activity is not subject to the CEQA. In addition,
and notwithstanding the foregoing, the Director of Development Services has also determined
that there is no possibility that the activity may have a significant effect on the environment;
therefore, pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the activity is not
subject to the CEQA. Thus, no environmental review is required; and
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 189
WHEREAS,the Planning Commission previously held a public hearing on this matter
and recommends that the City Council affirm permissive zoning principlesand clarify that uses
prohibited elsewhere in the Municipal Code are also prohibited land uses; and
WHEREAS, the Director of Development Services set the time and place for a public
hearing on the Amendment to Chapter19.02, and notice of the public hearing, together with its
purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the Cityat least 10
days prior to the public hearing.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, that the City Council of the City of Chula
Vista hereby makes the following findings:
Section I.
1.That section 19.08.020 of the Municipal Code currently declares unlawful any land
usesnot permitted in the City of Chula Vista, as such, the City Council findsand
affirmsthat the City’s Zoning Code has and continues to operate as a permissive
zoning code. Therefore, the City Council desires to enact an ordinance amending
Municipal Code Chapter 19.02 to affirm and make clear that Title 19 operates under
permissive zoning principles and that any use not permitted, including the cultivation
of marijuana, is prohibited.
2.That while cultivation of marijuana is currently prohibited under the City’s
permissive zoning regimen and under Chapter 5.66 of the City’s Municipal Code, the
City Council desires to amend Chapter 19.02to make clear that any action prohibited
elsewhere in the Municipal Code, which would include the cultivation of medical
marijuana under Chapter 5.66, is also prohibited as a land use under Title 19.
3.On January 26, 2016, the City Council held a public meeting during which it
considered the adoption of this Emergency Ordinance pursuant to California
Government Code § 36937 and the Chula Vista Charter § 311. Both California
Government Code § 36937 and Chula Vista Charter § 311 allow the adoption ofsuch
emergency ordinances to take effect immediately to ensure the immediate
preservation of the public peace, health, safety and general welfare in the City of
Chula Vista.
4.The City Council finds that the amendments to the City’s Municipal Code
implemented by this Emergency Ordinance are immediately necessary as an
emergency measure in order to meet the March 1, 2016 deadline imposed by newly
enacted California Health and Safety Code § 11362.777(c)(4). The Emergency
Ordinance is necessary to protect the public safety, health, and welfare of Chula Vista
residents as it maintains and secures local jurisdiction over the cultivation of medical
marijuana and prevents negative secondary side effects related to the cultivation of
medical marijuana as previously recognized by the City Council in its adoption of
Chula Vista Ordinance 3204 on September 20, 2011.
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 190
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA DOES FURTHER ORDAIN
as follows:
SectionII.
That Chapter 19.02 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code is herebyamended to read as
follows:
Chapter 19.02 –General Provisions
19.02.070 Permissive Zoning Principle
The provisions of this title are governed by the principles of permissive zoning, whereby
any use not permitted is prohibited.
19.02.080Actions Prohibited Elsewhere In Code
Actions prohibited elsewhere in this code are also prohibited as land uses under this Title.
Section III.Severability
If any portion of this Emergency Ordinance, or its application to any person or
circumstance,is for anyreason held to be invalid, unenforceable or unconstitutional, by a court
of competent jurisdiction, that portion shall be deemed severable, and such invalidity,
unenforceability or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the
remaining portions of the Emergency Ordinance, or its application to any other person or
circumstance. The City Council of the City of Chula Vista hereby declares that it would have
adopted each section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Emergency Ordinance, irrespective of the
fact that any one or more other sections, sentences, clauses or phrases of the Emergency
Ordinance be declared invalid, unenforceable or unconstitutional.
Section IV. Construction
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista intends this Emergency Ordinance to
supplement,not to duplicate or contradict, applicable state and federal law and this Emergency
Ordinance shall be construed in light of that intent.
Section V. Effective Date
This Emergency Ordinance shall take effect and be in force immediately upon adoption
by the City Council.
Section VI. Publication
The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause
the same to be published or posted according to law.
Presented by:Approved as to form by:
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 191
___________________________________________________________________
Glen R. Googins
Kelly Broughton, FASLA
Development Services DirectorCity Attorney
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 192
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista,
California on this 26thday of January, 2016, by the following vote:
AYES:Councilmembers:
NAYS:Councilmembers:
ABSENT:Councilmembers:
ABSTAIN:Councilmemebers:
____________________________________
Mary Casillas Salas, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________________
Donna Norris, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO) ss.
CITY OF CHULA VISTA)
I, Donna Norris, City Clerk of the City of Chula Vista, California, do hereby certify that the
foregoingEmergency Ordinance No. XXXX wasadoptedat a regular meeting of said City
th
Council held on the 26day of January, 2016.
th
Executed this 26day of January, 2016.
____________________________________
Donna Norris, City Clerk
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 193
ORDINANCE NO._______________
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
AMENDINGCHAPTER 19.02 OF THE CHULA VISTA
MUNICIPAL CODE TO AFFIRM PERMISSIVE ZONING
PRINCIPLES AND TO CLARIFY THAT USES
PROHIBITED ELSEWHERE IN THE MUNICIPAL CODE
ARE ALSO PROHIBITED LANDUSES
WHEREAS, the impetus for this subject amendment to Municipal Code Chapter 19.02
stems from the state laws governing medical marijuana; and
WHEREAS,on October 9, 2015, Governor Jerry Brown signed the “Medical Marijuana
Regulation and Safety Act” (the “Act”), which is comprised of the state legislative bills known
as AB 243, AB 266, and SB 643, into law; and
WHEREAS, the Act becomes effective January 1, 2016 and contains provisions that
govern the cultivating, processing, transporting, testing, and distributing of medical cannabis
(i.e., marijuana) to qualified patients; and
WHEREAS, the Act states that a local government that wishes to prevent marijuana
cultivation, as defined in the Business and Professions Code section 19300.5(l), must have aland
use regulation or ordinance regulating or prohibiting the cultivation of marijuana, either
expressly or otherwise under the principles of permissive zoning, prior to March 1, 2016 to retain
jurisdiction over such cultivation (Health and Safety Code 11362.777(c)(4)); and
WHEREAS, the Chula Vista Municipal Code expressly prohibits the cultivation of
medical marijuana in Title 5, section 5.66.020; and
WHEREAS, the Chula Vista Municipal Code in Title 19 operates as a permissive zoning
code, whereby uses not expressly permitted are prohibited; and
WHEREAS, the Director of Development Services has reviewed the proposed project for
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the
activity is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378 of the state CEQA Guidelines because
it will not result in a physical change in the environment; therefore, pursuant to Section
15060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the activity is not subject to the CEQA. In addition,
and notwithstanding the foregoing, the Director of Development Services has also determined
that there is no possibility that the activity may have a significant effect on the environment;
therefore, pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the activity is not
subject to the CEQA. Thus, no environmental review is required; and
WHEREAS,the Planning Commission previously held a public hearing on this matter
and recommends that the City Council affirm permissive zoning principles and clarify that uses
prohibited elsewhere in the Municipal Code are also prohibited land uses; and
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 194
WHEREAS, the Director of Development Services set the time and place for a public
hearing on the Amendment to Chapter19.02, and notice of the public hearing, together with its
purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the Cityat least 10
days prior to the public hearing.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, that the City Council of the City of Chula
Vista hereby makes the following findings:
Section I.
1.That section 19.08.020 of the Municipal Code currently declares unlawful any land
usesnot permitted in the City of Chula Vista, as such, the City Council findsand
affirmsthat the City’s Zoning Code has and continues to operate as a permissive
zoning code. Therefore, the City Council desires to enact an ordinance amending
Municipal Code Chapter 19.02 to affirm and make clear that Title 19 operates under
permissive zoning principles and that any use not permitted, including the cultivation
of marijuana, is prohibited.
2.That while cultivation of marijuana is currently prohibited under the City’s
permissive zoning regimen and under Chapter 5.66 of the City’s Municipal Code, the
City Council desires to amend Chapter 19.02to make clear that any action prohibited
elsewhere in the Municipal Code, which would include the cultivation of medical
marijuana under Chapter 5.66, is also prohibited as a land use under Title 19.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTADOES FURTHER ORDAIN
as follows:
SectionII.
That Chapter 19.02 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as
follows:
Chapter 19.02 –General Provisions
19.02.070 Permissive Zoning Principle
The provisions of this title are governedby the principles of permissive zoning, whereby
any use not permitted is prohibited.
19.02.080Actions Prohibited Elsewhere In Code
Actions prohibited elsewhere in this code are also prohibited as land uses under this Title.
Section III.Severability
If any portion of this Ordinance, or its application to any person or circumstance, is for
anyreason held to be invalid, unenforceable or unconstitutional, by a court of competent
jurisdiction, that portion shall be deemed severable, and such invalidity, unenforceability or
unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining portions of the
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 195
Ordinance, or its application to any other person or circumstance. The City Council of the City of
Chula Vista hereby declares that it would have adopted each section, sentence, clause or phrase
of this Ordinance, irrespective of the fact that any one or more other sections, sentences, clauses
or phrases of the Ordinance be declared invalid, unenforceable or unconstitutional.
Section IV. Construction
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista intends this Ordinance to supplement, not to
or contradict, applicable state and federal law and this Ordinance shall be construed in
duplicate
light of that intent.
Section V. Effective Date
This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force on the thirtieth day after its final passage.
Section VI. Publication
The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause
the same to be published or posted according to law.
Presented byApproved as to form by
___________________________________________________________________
Glen R. Googins,
Kelly Broughton, FASLA
Development Services DirectorCity Attorney
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 196
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista,
California on this 26th day of January, 2016, by the following vote:
AYES:Councilmembers:
NAYS:Councilmembers:
ABSENT:Councilmembers:
ABSTAIN:Councilmemebers:
____________________________________
Mary Casillas Salas, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________________
Donna Norris, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO) ss.
CITY OF CHULA VISTA)
I, Donna Norris, City Clerk of the City of Chula Vista, California, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Ordinance No. XXXX had its first reading at a regular meeting held on the 26thday of
January, 2016 and its second reading and adoption at a regular meeting of said City Council held
on the 2ndday of February, 2016.
Executed this 2nd day of February, 2016.
____________________________________
Donna Norris, City Clerk
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 197
City of Chula Vista
Staff Report
File#:16-0034, Item#: 9.
PRESENTATIONONTHEFIRSTPHASEOFAMULTI-PHASEPROCESSTOATTRACTAN
INSTITUTIONALPARTNERANDFUNDINGSOURCETODEVELOPTHEUNIVERSITYAND
INNOVATION DISTRICT
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Council accept the report.
Environmental Notice
Theactivityisnota“Project”asdefinedunderSection15378oftheCaliforniaEnvironmentalQuality
ActStateGuidelines;therefore,pursuanttoStateGuidelinesSection15060(c)(3)noenvironmental
review is required.
City of Chula VistaPage 1 of 1Printed on 1/21/2016
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 198
ITEM #9
Attachment 1 Report
YOU WILL RECEIVE AN E-MAIL INDICATING
WHEN THIS ATTACHMENT IS AVAILABLE
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 199
City of Chula Vista
Staff Report
File#:16-0038, Item#: 10.
Presentation of the COP21: Advocating for Climate Change Action
City of Chula VistaPage 1 of 1Printed on 1/21/2016
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΕȃΏΐȃΑΕ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 200