Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015-10-13 - Agenda Packet 1 dalue under paiulry et perJury thn I ein en�ployed by the Ciry of Chula Viw in the office of the Ciry Clak �od tbu 1 patW die documan axo�din�to Brown Aa � n.«a: la 8 ►S s�.a: �� � / " � � cm oF �� CHULA VLSTA � ��+�Z��� � Mary Casillas Salas, Mayor PaVicia Agwlar, Councilmember Gary Halbert. City Manager Pamela Bensoussan, Counalmember Glen R. Googins, City Attomey John McCann, Councilmember ponna R. Norris, City Clerlc Steve Miesen, Councilmember Tuesday, October 13, 2015 5:00 PM Council Chambers 276 4th Avenue, Building A Chula Vista, CA 91910 SPECIAL MEETING OF THE HOUSING AUTHORITY MEETING JOINTLY WITH THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA Motice is Aereby given that Me Maya o/ fhe City o� Chula Vista has called and will convene a Specral Meebng W tha Housing Authorrty meeting jofitly with the City Courrcil on Tuesday, Ocfober 13. 2015, at S�OOp.m. in Me Council Chambers. located at 276 Fourth Avenue. Suilding A. Chula Vista. Ca/Aom�a to cons�der items on Mis agerrda CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL: Councilmembers Aguilar, Bensoussan, McCann. Miesen and Mayor Salas PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG AND MOMENT OF SILENCE SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY A. 15-0500 PRESENTATION OF A PROCLAMATION TO CALIFORNIA PROSTATE CANCER COALITION AND US T�O INTERNATIONAL VOLUNTEER AND BOARD MEMBER CHAD LITTLE, PROCLAIMING NOVEMBER 2015 AS MONTH OF MOVEMBER IN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA Gry o/ChW 17m P�p�1 PlinlsO on/M/5015 City Council Agenda October 13,2015 CONSENT CALENDAR (Items 1 -4) The Counci! will enact the Consent Calendar stalf recommendations 6y one motion, without discussion, unless a Councifinember, a member oi the public, or sta// requests that an item be removed Ior discussion. I/ you wish to speak on one oi these items, please fill out a "Request to Speak" /orm (available in the lobby) and submit R to the City Clerk pnor to the meeting. Items pulled from the Consent Calendar will be discussed immediately /ollowing Ihe Consent Calendar 1. 15-0559 WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS A. Letter of resignation from David Danciu, Growth Management Oversight Committee B. Letter of resignation from Crystal Alonso, Cultural Arts Commission sr,na«,�a,�m«�mnw�: Council accept the resignations. 2. 1 271 A. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ORDERING THE SUMMARY VACATION OF THE IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF DEDICATION FOR PUBLIC PARK PURPOSES LOCATED IN OTAY RANCH VILLAGE 2 B. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ORDERING THE SUMMARY VACATION OF THE IRREVOCABLE OFFERS OF DEDICATION FOR PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AND OTHER PURPOSES LOCATED IN OTAY RANCH VILLAGE 2 �,m�.�r Development Services Department sunaeco,�m«,a.no,,: Council adopt the resolutions. cny or cn,.a r:u vap.: vri,md on,uaaots City Council Agenda October 73,ZO15 3. 15-0528 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING YEAR TWO OF A SUB-AWARD AGREEMENT WITH COMMUNITY HEALTH IMPROVEMENT PARTNERS FOR THE RACIAL AND ETHNIC APPROACHES TO COMMUNITY HEALTH PROJECT, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT AND THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE ALL OTHER DOCUMENTS NECESSARY TO IMPLEMENT THE AGREEMENT, AND APPROPRIATING $30,000 TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016 FEDERAL GRANTS FUND TO BE OFFSET BY UNANTICIPATED REVENUE (4/5 VOTE REQUIRED) wv,.m�«�r Development Services Department sanrrecomme�mao�: Council adopt the resolution. 4. 15-04D0 RE50LUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING A GRANT AWARD FROM THE CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY, I APPROPRIATING $210,OOOIN THE FEDERAL GRANT FUND, AND AUTHORIZING THE FIRE CHIEF OR HIS DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE ALL RELATED DOCUMENTATION AND PROCUREMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS GRANT (4/5 VOTE REQUIRED) oep„r,�«�r Fire Departrnent snnae�o,�m«�mno,�: Council adopt the resolution. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR PUBLIC COMMENTS Persons speaking dunng Public Comments may address the Counci! on any subject matter within the Council's junsdiction that is not listed as an item on the agenda. State law generally prohi6its the Council /rom discussing or taking action on any issue not induded on the agenda. but, ii appropriate, the Council may schedule the topic lor future discussion or refer the matter to staff Comments are limited to th2e minutes. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following item(s) have been advertised as public heanng(s) as required 6y law. 11 you wisli to speak on any item, please fill out a 'Request to Speak° form (available in the lobby) and submd it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. City or CnuY Ysu Pap�] PYfiMW m 10Yt075 I Ciry Council Agenda October13,2015 5. 15- 527 CONSIDERATION OF THE HEALTHY COMMUNITIES CONCEPTS FOR THE CITY'S GENERAL PLAN RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY'S GENERAL PLAN TO INCLUDE HEALTH AND WELL BEING POLICIES AND OBJECTIVES oe�,m��,r: Development Services DepartmenUEconomic Development Department s�na�omme�n�: Council conduct the public hearing and adopt the resolution. 6. 15-0539 CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSUANCE OF TAX-EXEMPT OBLIGATIONS WITH RESPECT TO PROPOSED FINANCING OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 123-UNIT SENIOR AND 87-UNIT AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT IN THE MILLENIA COMMUNITY A. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE ISSUANCE, SALE AND DELIVERY OF MULTIFAMILY HOUSING REVENUE BONDS OF THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA FOR MILLENIA SENIOR AFFORDABLE APARTMENTS B. RESOLUTION OF THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA REGARDING ITS INTENTION TO ISSUE TAX-EXEMPT OBLIGATIONS FOR A PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF THE MILLENIA SENIOR AFFORDABLE APARTMENTS C. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE ISSUANCE, SALE AND DELIVERY OF MULTIFAMILY HOUSING REVENUE BONDS OF THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA FOR MILLENIA AFFORDABLE APARTMENTS Ciry ol Clrula Visb Page I Prinretl on idb2015 City Council Agenda Octo6ar 13,2075 D. RESOLUTION OF THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA REGARDING ITS INTENTION TO ISSUE TAX-EXEMPT OBLIGATIONS FOR A PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF THE MILLENIA AFFORDABLE APARTMENTS �.�: Development Services Department sbnReca�m«�a,aa�: Council conduct the public hearing, adopt resolutions A and C; Authordy adopt resolutions B and D. ACTION ITEMS The Item(s) listed in this section of the agenda wil! be considered rndividua!!y by the Council and are expected to elicit discussion and deliberation. !f you wish to speak on any item, pfease fill out a "Request fo Speak" /orm (available rn the lobby) and submit rt to Me Ciry Clerk pno�to the meeting. 7. 15-0508 PRESENTATION OF A WATER CONSERVATION APPROACH FOR CITY HALL GROUNDS AND LANDSCAPE AREAS (REFERENCE CITY COUNCIL DISCUSSION OF 05/12/15) o.P.mm.nr. Development Services Department sona«�m.�mo�: Council accept the report and provide comments. 8. 15-0545 PRESENTATION OF A REPORT ON THE STATUS OF THE ONGOING ASSET MANAGEMENT PROGRAM AND FINANCING STUDY ne�,rman: Public Works Department sona«o�,m�mow�: Council hear the repoR. 9. 1 1 DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE DIRECTION TO STAFF REGARDING HOMELESSNESSISSUES n�nm�rc: City Manager sunEreco,�me�ea�,,: Council discuss and provide any direction to staff. CITY MANAGER'S REPORTS MAYOR'S REPORTS Cfty o/Cnul�lfab Pape 5 Printatl on 1WlrlO15 i Cily Council Agenda Octo6ar13,2015 COUNCILMEMBERS' COMMENTS 10. 15_0567 COUNCILMEMBER MIESEN RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA OPPOSING THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO'S UNITARY RATE ALTERNATIVE FOR RECYCLED WATER SERVICE IN FAVOR OF A ZONAL RATE Councilmember Recommendation: Council adopt the resolution. ADJOURNMENT to the Regular City Counci! Meeting on October 27, 2015, at S:OOp.m., in the Counci! Chambers. Materials provided to the City Council related to any open-session item on this agenda a�e available for public review at the Ciry Clerk's O�ce, located in Cify Hall af 276 FouRh Avenue, Building A, dunng normal business hours. !n compliance with the AMERICANS WfTH DISABILlTIES ACT The City o/Chula Vista requests individuals who require special accommodations to access, attend, and/or participate in a City meeting, adivity, or service, contact the City Clerk's O�ce at(619) 69f-5041(Califomia Relay Service is available for the heanng impaired 6y dialing 711) at/east lorty-eight hours in advance of the meeting. Chula Vista Ciry Council meetings, including public oomments, are video recorded and aired lrve on AT6T U-verse channel 99(thiouqhout the County), on Cox Cable channel 24 (only in Chula Vista), and online at www.chulavistaca.gov. Recorded meetings ara also aired on Wednesdays at 7 p.m. (both channels) and are archrved on the City's website. Sign up at www.chulavistaca.gov to receive email notifications when City Council agendas are pu6lished online. cxy oi cnw.rrm v.w e vn�de o��avlms City of Chula Vista Staff Report File#:15-0500, Item#: A. PRESENTATIONOFAPROCLAMATIONTOCALIFORNIAPROSTATECANCERCOALITION ANDUSTOOINTERNATIONALVOLUNTEERANDBOARDMEMBERCHADLITTLE, PROCLAIMING NOVEMBER 2015 AS MONTH OF MOVEMBER IN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA City of Chula VistaPage 1 of 1Printed on 10/8/2015 powered by Legistar™ ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 7 City of Chula Vista Staff Report File#:15-0559, Item#: 1. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS A.Letter of resignation from David Danciu, Growth Management Oversight Committee B.Letter of resignation from Crystal Alonso, Cultural Arts Commission RECOMMENDED ACTION Council accept the resignations. City of Chula VistaPage 1 of 1Printed on 10/8/2015 powered by Legistar™ ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 8 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 9 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 10 City of Chula Vista Staff Report File#:15-0271, Item#: 2. A.RESOLUTIONOFTHECITYCOUNCILOFTHECITYOFCHULAVISTAORDERINGTHE SUMMARYVACATIONOFTHEIRREVOCABLEOFFEROFDEDICATIONFORPUBLIC PARK PURPOSES LOCATED IN OTAY RANCH VILLAGE 2 B.RESOLUTIONOFTHECITYCOUNCILOFTHECITYOFCHULAVISTAORDERINGTHE SUMMARYVACATIONOFTHEIRREVOCABLEOFFERSOFDEDICATIONFORPUBLIC OPEN SPACE AND OTHER PURPOSES LOCATED IN OTAY RANCH VILLAGE 2 RECOMMENDED ACTION Council adopt the resolutions. SUMMARY BaldwinandSons(Developer)isrequestingthevacationofthreeirrevocableoffersofdedication (IODs)forpublicparkpurposesandpublicopenspacepurposes.TheDeveloperisreplacingthe existingoffersofdedicationwithIODsintheirultimateconfigurationandinanequivalentormore acreage. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Development Services Director has reviewed the Project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and determined that the Project was covered by previous adopted FSEIR 12-01. Thus, no further environmental review is necessary. BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Not Applicable DISCUSSION Park P-3 IOD OnMay26,2006,TheCityofChulaVista,bywayofResolutionNo.2006-157,approvedthe TentativeMapforChulaVistaTractNo.11-05.ThetentativemapapprovedthelocationofParkP-3 withinOtayRanchVillage2North.Subsequently,OtayProject,L.P.grantedanIrrevocableOfferof DedicationofFeeInterestforPublicParkPurposesfortheP-3ParkSitetotheCityofChulaVistaon FinalMapNo.15350.TheparkwaslocatedattheintersectionofSantaDianaRoadandSanta Victoria Road and contained 6.929 acres. OnNovember4,2014,CouncilapprovedaSectionalPlanningArea(SPA)planamendmentwhich relocatedtheVillage2SwimClubtotheintersectionofSantaDianaRoadandSantaVictoriaRoad and shifted the P-3 Park site to the west. This action reconfigures the existing IOD to the new SPA City of Chula VistaPage 1 of 3Printed on 10/8/2015 powered by Legistar™ ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 11 File#:15-0271, Item#: 2. BaldwinandSonsiscurrentlyprocessingtheVillage2NorthNeighborhoodR-10Bfinalmap. NeighborhoodR-10Bisamultifamilyneighborhoodwith31residentialunitslocatedadjacenttoPark P-3.ThefinalmapincludesanirrevocableofferofdedicationfortheultimateconfigurationoftheP-3 ParkinVillageTwo.StaffrecommendstheSummaryVacationberecordedconcurrentwiththe recordation of this final map. Village 2 Open Space Preserve IODs OnNovember10,1999,OtayProjectL.P.,perdocumentno.1999-0748994,madeanofferto dedicate30.06acresforopenspaceandotherpurposestotheCityofChulaVistaandCountyof San Diego as joint tenants. OnDecember2,1999,OtayProjectL.P.,perdocumentno.1999-0790108,madeanofferto dedicate2.28acresforopenspaceandotherpurposestotheCityofChulaVistaandtheCountyof San Diego as joint tenants. Theoffersofdedicationweremadetosatisfythedeveloper’sconditiontodedicatelandequivalentto 1.188acresforeveryacreoflandthatisdevelopedpertheOtayRanchResourceManagement Plan.WiththefinalgradingofOtayRanchVillage2South,thelandadjacenttotheIODs,the boundarybetweenthetworequiressomeadjustment.BaldwinandSonsisprocessingalotline adjustmentfinalmapthatwilladjustthepropertylinetoitsultimateconfigurationandincludenew offersofdedicationtoreplacetheexistingIODsthatareproposedforvacation.Thenewoffersof dedication will be of equal acreage with the existing IODs in the amount of 32.34 acres. The County of San Diego has since quitclaimed their interest in the IODs. InaccordancewithSection7050oftheCaliforniaGovernmentCodeandSection8335ofthe CaliforniaStreetsandHighwaysCode,CouncilmaysummarilyvacatetheIODwitharesolutionof vacation that shall state all of the following: 1.ThatthevacationismadeunderSection7050oftheCaliforniaGovernmentCodeand Chapter 4 of the California Streets and Highways Code; 2.Thenameorotherdesignationoftheeasementandaprecisedescriptionoftheportion vacated (see Attachments 1, 2, and 3); 3.The facts under which the vacation is made; and, 4.Fromandafterthedatetheresolutionisrecorded,thevacatedIODnolongerconstitutesan open space or public park. These provisions have been included in the resolutions. DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT StaffhasreviewedthepropertyholdingsoftheCityCouncilmembersandhasfoundnoproperty holdingswithin500feetoftheboundariesofthepropertywhichisthesubjectofthisaction. City of Chula VistaPage 2 of 3Printed on 10/8/2015 powered by Legistar™ ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 12 File#:15-0271, Item#: 2. Consequently,thisitemdoesnotpresentadisqualifyingrealproperty-relatedfinancialconflictof interestunderCaliforniaCodeofRegulationsTitle2,section18705.2(a)(11),forpurposesofthe Political Reform Act (Cal. Gov’t Code §87100,et seq.). Staffisnotindependentlyaware,andhasnotbeeninformedbyanyCityCouncilmember,ofany other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter. LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS TheCity’sStrategicPlanhasfivemajorgoals:OperationalExcellence,EconomicVitality,Healthy Community,StrongandSecureNeighborhoodsandaConnectedCommunity.Theproposedaction addresstheEconomicVitalityandtheHealthyCommunitygoalsasitsupportstheimplementationof theGeneralPlangoaltodevelopOtayRanchVillageTwoandsupportstheconstructionoftheOtay Ranch Village 2 P-3 park site. CURRENT YEAR FISCAL IMPACT There is no current year fiscal impact associated with the vacation of the IODs ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT There is no ongoing fiscal impact associated with the vacation of the IODs ATTACHMENTS Attachment 1: Legal Description of the Park P-3 IOD Attachment 2: Doc. No. 1999-0748994, IOD for Open Space and Other Purposes Attachment 3: Doc. No. 1999-0790108, IOD for Open Space and Other Purposes Staff Contact: Chester Bautista City of Chula VistaPage 3 of 3Printed on 10/8/2015 powered by Legistar™ ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 13 RESOLUTION NO. 2015-__________ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ORDERINGTHE SUMMARY VACATIONOF THE IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF DEDICATION FOR PUBLIC PARK PURPOSES LOCATED IN OTAY RANCH VILLAGE 2. WHEREAS, Baldwin and Sons.has requested the vacation of anirrevocable offer of dedicationlocated on the Otay Ranch Village 2 Neighborhood Park P-3 Project Site as described on Exhibit “A”(Property); and WHEREAS, an irrevocable offer of dedication for public park purposes was granted to the City Of Chula Vista per Map No. 15350recorded May 26,2006; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 7050 of the Government Code, which states that an IOD may be terminated and the right to accept such an offer may be abandoned in the manner prescribedfor the summary vacation of streets or highways by Part 3 (commencing with Section 8300) of Division 9 of the Streets and Highways Code; and WHEREAS, in order to vacate an IOD, City Council must adopt a resolution of vacation and a certified copy of the resolution attested to by the City Clerk must be recorded; and WHEREAS, the Development Services Director has reviewed the proposed activity for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that there is no possibility that the activity may have a significant effect on the environment; therefore, pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines the activity is not subject to CEQA. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, after considering the evidence submitted, finds that the Irrevocable Offer of Dedication made by Map No. 15350recorded May 26, 2006, is unnecessary for present or prospective public use, since it has been replaced by an Irrevocable Offer of Dedicationon the subsequent Otay Ranch Village 2 North Neighborhood R-10B final map; and the City Council does hereby order the vacation of said Irrevocable Offer of Dedication recorded May 26, 2006. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, that the City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a certified copy of the resolution of vacation, attested by the City Clerk under seal, to be recorded without acknowledgment, certificate of acknowledgement, or further proof in the Office of the Recorder of the County of San Diego, State of California. Upon recordation, the vacation shall be complete. ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 14 Resolution No. Page 2 Presented byApproved as to form by ______________________________________________________ Kelly BroughtonGlen R. Googins Development Services DirectorCity Attorney ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 15 Resolution No. Page 3 EXHIBIT “A” (Legal Description of Property) LOT A, CHULA VISTA TRACT NO. 06-05, MAP OF OTAY RANCHVILLAGE 2 AND PORTIONS OF VILLAGE 4 “A”, IN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, COUNTYOF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 15350FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, MAY 26,2006. ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 16 RESOLUTION NO. 2015-__________ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ORDERINGTHE SUMMARY VACATIONOF THE IRREVOCABLE OFFERSOF DEDICATION FOR PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AND OTHERPURPOSES LOCATED IN OTAY RANCH VILLAGE 2. WHEREAS, Baldwin and Sons.has requested the vacation of anirrevocable offer of dedicationlocated on the Otay Ranch Village 2 Boundary along Wolf Canyonas described on Exhibit “A”(Property); and WHEREAS, an irrevocable offer of dedication for open space and other publicpurposes was granted to the City Of Chula Vistaand the County of San Diegoper Document No. 1999- 0748994,recorded November 10, 1999; and WHEREAS, an irrevocable offer of dedication for open space and other public purposes was granted to the City Of Chula Vista and the County of San Diego per Document No. 1999- 0790108, recorded December 2, 1999; and WHEREAS, the County of San Diego has already quitclaimed their interest in both irrevocable offers of dedication. WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 7050 of the Government Code, which states that an IOD may be terminated and the right to accept such an offer may be abandoned in the manner prescribed for the summary vacation of streets or highways by Part 3 (commencing with Section 8300) of Division 9 of the Streets and Highways Code; and WHEREAS, in order to vacate an IOD, City Council must adopt a resolution of vacation and a certified copy of the resolution attested to by the City Clerk must be recorded; and WHEREAS, the Development Services Director has reviewed the proposed activity for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that there is no possibility that the activity may have a significant effect on the environment; therefore, pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines the activity is not subject to CEQA. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, after considering the evidence submitted, finds that the Irrevocable Offersof Dedication made by Document No. 1999-0748994, recorded November 10, 1999 and Document No. 1999- 0790108, recorded December 2, 1999, are unnecessary for present or prospective public use, since they havebeen replaced by Irrevocable Offersof Dedication on the subsequent Otay Ranch Village 2 South Lot Line Adjustment final map; and the City Council does hereby order the vacation of said Irrevocable Offersof Dedication. ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 17 Resolution No. Page 2 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, that the City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a certified copy of the resolution of vacation, attested by the City Clerk under seal, to be recorded without acknowledgment, certificate of acknowledgement, or further proof in the Office of the Recorder of the County of San Diego, State of California. Upon recordation, the vacation shall be complete. Presented byApproved as to form by ______________________________________________________ Kelly BroughtonGlen R. Googins Development Services DirectorCity Attorney ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 18 Resolution No. Page 3 EXHIBIT “A” (Legal Description of Property) Document No. 1999-0748994 Parcel A: IN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, THAT PORTION OF LOT 32 OF OTAY RANCH, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 862, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDER ON JUNE 4, 1915, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 32 AS SHOWN ON RECORD OF SURVEY MAP NO. 12371, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDER ON OCTOBER 12, 1989; THENCE NORTH 18°38’24” WEST, 88.33 FEET ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF LOT 32; THENCE LEAVING THE WESTERLY LINE OF LOT 32 THE FOLLOWING 38 COURSES: 1.NORTH 58°28’23" EAST, 198.50 FEET; 2.NORTH 21°28’00" EAST, 75.00 FEET; 3.NORTH 10°32’00” WEST, 107.00 FEET; 4.NORTH 36°02’00” WEST, 83.00 FEET; 5.NORTH 08°02’00” WEST, 201.00 FEET; 6.NORTH 10°28’00” EAST, 69.00 FEET; 7.NORTH 36°58’00” EAST, 46.00 FEET; 8.SOUTH 81°32’00” EAST, 108.00 FEET; 9.NORTH 64°13’00” EAST, 79.00 FEET; 10.NORTH 28°28’00” EAST, 540.00 FEET; 11.NORTH 15°47’00” WEST, 142.00 FEET; 12.NORTH 29°02’00” WEST, 296.00FEET; 13.NORTH 50°02’00” WEST, 298.00 FEET; 14.NORTH 25°32’00” WEST, 65.00 FEET; 15.NORTH 07°13’00” EAST, 107.00 FEET; 16.NORTH 35°28’00” EAST, 135.00 FEET; 17.NORTH 70°13’00” EAST, 90.00 FEET; 18.SOUTH 58°47’00” EAST, 86.00 FEET; 19.SOUTH 41°02’00” EAST, 325.00 FEET; 20.SOUTH 23°02’00” EAST, 78.00 FEET; ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 19 Resolution No. Page 4 21.SOUTH 42°32’00” EAST, 69.00 FEET; 22.SOUTH 87°02’00” EAST, 61.00 FEET; 23.NORTH 52°43’00” EAST, 188.00 FEET; 24.NORTH 01°28’00” EAST, 71.00 FEET; 25.NORTH 39°17’00” WEST, 194.00 FEET; 26.NORTH 35°58’00” EAST, 72.00 FEET; 27.NORTH 75°58’00” EAST, 86.00 FEET; 28.NORTH 37°58’00” EAST, 72.00 FEET; 29.NORTH 06°17’00” WEST, 228.00 FEET; 30.NORTH 82°43’00” EAST, 89.00 FEET; 31.SOUTH 85°17’00” EAST, 94.00 FEET; 32.SOUTH 20°02’00” EAST, 110.00 FEET; 33.SOUTH 51°02’00” EAST, 88.00 FEET; 34.NORTH 84°58’00” EAST, 105.00 FEET; 35.NORTH 41°58’00” EAST, 89.00 FEET; 36.NORTH 10°43’00” EAST, 208.00 FEET; 37.NORTH 12°17’00” WEST, 547.00 FEET; 38.NORTH 22°17’00” WEST, 120.29 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 32; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 32 NORTH 71°57’38” EAST, 32.99 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY SIDELINE OF THE SAN DIEGO PIPELINE AS GRANTED TO THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO PER DOCUMENT RECORDED JANUARY 31, 1913 AS BOOK 598, PAGE 54 OF DEEDS; THENCE LEAVING THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 32 ALONG THE WESTERLY SIDELINE OF SAID SAN DIEGO PIPELINE THE FOLLOWING 3 COURSES: 1.SOUTH 48°42’55” EAST, 180.96 FEET; 2.SOUTH 26°17’00” EAST, 490.00 FEET; 3.SOUTH 44°02’00” EAST, 189.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTHWESTERLY SIDELINE OF THE EASEMENT GRANTED TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PER DOCUMENT RECORDED APRIL 23, 1980 AS FILE NO. 80-137651 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE LEAVING THE WESTERLY SIDELINE OF SAID SAN DIEGO PIPELINE ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY SIDELINE OF SAID EASEMENT TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA THE FOLLOWING 15 COURSES: 1.SOUTH 41°58’00” WEST, 81.00 FEET; 2.SOUTH 34°58’00” WEST, 341.00 FEET; 3.SOUTH 50°58’00” WEST, 292.00 FEET; 4.SOUTH 35°28’00” WEST, 633.00 FEET; ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 20 Resolution No. Page 5 5.SOUTH 02°47’00” EAST, 111.00 FEET; 6.SOUTH 19°28’00” WEST, 128.00 FEET; 7.SOUTH 29°58’00” WEST, 64.00 FEET; 8.SOUTH 52°58’00” WEST, 178.00 FEET; 9.SOUTH 14°13’00” WEST, 158.00 FEET; 10.SOUTH 20°58’00” WEST, 69.00 FEET; 11.SOUTH 25°58’00” WEST, 178.00 FEET; 12.SOUTH 23°58’00” WEST, 76.00 FEET; 13.SOUTH 13°45’00” WEST, 106.00 FEET; 14.SOUTH 04°00’00” WEST, 77.00 FEET; 15.SOUTH 09°30’00” WEST, 292.93 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 32; THENCE ALONG THE SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT 32 LEAVING THE NORTHWESTERLY SIDELINE OF SAID EASEMENT TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA SOUTH 71°57’56” WEST, 444.02 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM ANY PORTION LYING WITHIN THE SAN DIEGO PIPELINE GRANTED PER BOOK 598, PAGE 54 OF DEEDS FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, JANUARY 31, 1913, AND LYING WITHIN THE EASEMENT GRANTED TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PER DOCUMENT NO. 80- 137651 FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, APRIL 23, 1980 AND IN DOCUMENT RECORDED APRIL 27, 1982 AS FILE NO. 82-120168, BOTH OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. LESS AND EXCEPTING THEREFROM ANY PORTION OF THE LAND LYING WITHIN THE EXISTING ROADWAY ON THE SOUTHERN BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID LAND; AND TO THE USE OF SAID ROADWAY FOR ACCESS, INGRESS, EGRESS AND OTHER PURPOSES. CONTAINS 28.39 ACRES MORE OR LESS. PARCEL B: IN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, THAT PORTION OF LOT 32 OF OTAY RANCH, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 862, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDER ON JUNE 4, 1915, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 21 Resolution No. Page 6 COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 32 AS SHOWN ON RECORD OF SURVEY MAP NO. 12371, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDER ON OCTOBER 12, 1989; SAID NORTHEAST CORNER BEARS NORTH 18°39’04” WEST FROM THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 32 AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP NO. 12371; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 32 TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING SOUTH 71°57’38” WEST, 47.25 FEET TO THE OF THE PARCEL HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 32 SOUTH 71°57’38” WEST, 212.23 FEET; THENCE LEAVING THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 32 THE FOLLOWING 2 COURSES: 1.SOUTH 26°30’00” EAST, 168.00 FEET; 2.SOUTH 62°30’00” WEST, 10.50 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY SIDELINE OF THE SAN DIEGO PIPELINE AS GRANTED TO THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO PER DOCUMENT RECORDED AS BOOK 598, PAGE 54 OF DEEDS ON JANUARY 31, 1913; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY SIDELINE OF SAID SAN DIEGO PIPELINE THE FOLLOWING 3 COURSES: 1.SOUTH 26°00’00” EAST, 384.00 FEET; 2.SOUTH 31°30’00” EAST, 91.00 FEET; 3.SOUTH 43°30’00” EAST, 168.00 FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY SIDELINE OF THE EASEMENT GRANTED TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PER DOCUMENT RECORDED APRIL 23, 1980 AS FILE NO. 80- 137651 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY SIDELINE OF SAID EASEMENT GRANTED TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA LEAVING SAID EASTERLY SIDELINE OF SAID SAN DIEGO PIPELINE; 1.NORTH 57°00’00” EAST, 110.39 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 32; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 32 LEAVING SAID NORTHWESTERLY SIDELINE OF SAID EASEMENT GRANTED TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NORTH 18°39’04” WEST 220.50 FEET; THENCE LEAVING THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 32 THE FOLLOWING 8 COURSES: 1.SOUTH 66°00’00” WEST, 103.72 FEET; 2.NORTH 87°15’00” WEST, 78.00 FEET; 3.NORTH 51°15’00” WEST, 48.00 FEET; 4.NORTH 26°15’00” WEST, 118.00 FEET; 5.NORTH 12°30’00” WEST, 102.00 FEET; 6.NORTH 07°45’00” EAST, 87.00 FEET; ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 22 Resolution No. Page 7 7.NORTH 20°00’00” EAST, 128.00 FEET; 8.NORTH 07°00’00” EAST, 93.66 FEET TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING TO THE . EXCEPTING THEREFROM ANY PORTION LYING WITHIN THE SAN DIEGO PIPELINE GRANTED PER BOOK 598, PAGE 54 OF DEEDS FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, JANUARY 31, 1913, AND LYING WITHIN THE EASEMENT GRANTED TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PER DOCUMENT NO. 80- 137651 FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, APRIL 23, 1980 AND IN DOCUMENT RECORDED APRIL 27, 1982 AS FILE NO. 82-120168, BOTH OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. LESS AND EXCEPTING THEREFROM ANY PORTION OF THE LAND LYING WITHIN THE EXISTING ROADWAY ON THE SOUTHERN BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID LAND; AND TO THE USE OF SAID ROADWAY FOR ACCESS,INGRESS, EGRESS AND OTHER PURPOSES. CONTAINS 1.67 ACRES MORE OR LESS. Document No. 1999-0790108 IN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, THAT PORTION OF LOT 29 OF OTAY RANCH, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 862, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDER ON JUNE 4, 1915, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 29 AS SHOWN ON RECORD AP. NO. 12371, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY OF SURVEY M RECORDER ON OCTOBER 12, 1989; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 29, AND THE EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 32 OF SAID MAP NO. 862, SOUTH 1839’04” EAST, 540.39 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY TERMINUS OF THAT CERTAIN COURSE DESCRIBED IN PARCEL “B” OF IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF DEDICATION OF FEE INTEREST RECORDED ON NOVEMBER 10, 1999 IN DOCUMENT NO. 1999-0748994, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS AS “NORTH 1839’04” WEST, 220.50 FEET’, SAID POINT BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING ; THENCE LEAVING SAID WESTERLY LINE ALONG THE FOLLOWING 28 COURSES: 1.NORTH 6206’10” EAST, 14.82 FEET; ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 23 Resolution No. Page 8 2.NORTH 5055’21” EAST, 98.55 FEET; 3.NORTH 5439’56” EAST, 52.10 FEET; 4.NORTH 4714’45” EAST, 36.09 FEET; 5.NORTH 4207’04” EAST, 54.42 FEET; 6.NORTH 3320’59” EAST, 35.47 FEET; 7.NORTH 2838’48” EAST, 35.46 FEET; 8.NORTH 3245’20” EAST, 42.51 FEET; 9.NORTH 4807’48” EAST, 43.64 FEET; 10.NORTH 5724’56” EAST, 41.54 FEET; 11.NORTH 6714’37” EAST, 80.79 FEET; 12.NORTH 7700’48” EAST, 32.84 FEET; 13.SOUTH 3207’30” EAST, 50.77 FEET; 14.SOUTH 2745’31” EAST, 53.68 FEET; 15.SOUTH 0714’55” WEST, 35.67 FEET; 16.SOUTH 1819’26” WEST,60.43 FEET; 17.SOUTH 3015’23” WEST, 13.89 FEET; 18.SOUTH 5019’25” WEST, 40.93 FEET; 19.SOUTH 4618’30” WEST, 50.48 FEET; 20.SOUTH 4812’19” WEST, 88.53 FEET; 21.SOUTH 4546’54” WEST, 90.69 FEET; 22.SOUTH 4321’48” WEST, 37.14 FEET; 23.SOUTH 8525’34” WEST, 11.04 FEET; 24.SOUTH8909’27” WEST, 17.00 FEET; 25.SOUTH 6326’06” WEST, 21.24 FEET; 26.SOUTH 5941’18” WEST, 70.08 FEET; 27.SOUTH 7046’29” WEST, 37.60 FEET; 28.SOUTH 6556’59” WEST, 42.24 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 29 AND SAID PARCEL B; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID TRUE POINT WESTERLY LINE NORTH 1839’04” WEST, 137.64 FEET TO THE OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM ANY PORTION LYING WITHIN THE SAN DIEGO PIPELINE GRANTED PER BOOK 598, PAGE 54 OF DEEDS FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, JANUARY 31, 1913, AND LYING WITHIN THE EASEMENT GRANTED TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PER DOCUMENT NO. 80- 137651 FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 24 Resolution No. Page 9 APRIL 23, 1980 AND IN DOCUMENT RECORDED APRIL 27, 1982 AS FILE NO. 82-120168, BOTH OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. LESS AND EXCEPTING THEREFROM ANY PORTION OF THE LAND LYING WITHIN THE EXISTING ROADWAY ON THE SOUTHERN BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID LAND; AND TO THE USE OF SAID ROADWAY FOR ACCESS, INGRESS, EGRESS AND OTHER PURPOSES. CONTAINS 2.28 ACRESMORE OR LESS. . ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 25 Attachment 1 (Legal Description of Property) LOT A, CHULA VISTA TRACT NO. 06-05, MAP OF OTAY RANCH VILLAGE 2 AND PORTIONS OF VILLAGE 4 “A”, IN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 15350 FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, MAY 26, 2006. ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 26 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 27 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 28 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 29 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 30 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 31 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 32 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 33 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 34 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 35 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 36 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 37 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 38 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 39 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 40 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 41 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 42 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 43 City of Chula Vista Staff Report File#:15-0528, Item#: 3. RESOLUTIONOFTHECITYCOUNCILOFTHECITYOFCHULAVISTAAPPROVINGYEARTWO OFASUB-AWARDAGREEMENTWITHCOMMUNITYHEALTHIMPROVEMENTPARTNERSFOR THERACIALANDETHNICAPPROACHESTOCOMMUNITYHEALTHPROJECT,AUTHORIZING THEMAYORTOEXECUTETHEAGREEMENTANDTHECITYMANAGERTOEXECUTEALL OTHERDOCUMENTSNECESSARYTOIMPLEMENTTHEAGREEMENT,ANDAPPROPRIATING $30,000TOTHEFISCALYEAR2015/2016FEDERALGRANTSFUNDTOBEOFFSETBY UNANTICIPATED REVENUE (4/5 VOTE REQUIRED) RECOMMENDED ACTION Council adopt the resolution. SUMMARY OnJune2,2015CityCouncilapprovedtheYearOneAgreementbetweenCommunityHealth ImprovementPartnersforfundingthroughtheCenterforDiseaseControlandPrevention’sRacial andEthnicApproachestoCommunityHealthy(REACH)programtopromotehealthyeatingand physicalactivitytoLatinoslivinginChulaVista’s91910and91911zipcodes.Thisactionwill approveYearTwofundingintheamountof$30,000forstafftimetofurtherdeveloppoliciesand plans supporting healthy food access and active transportation. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW TheDevelopmentServicesDirectorhasreviewedtheproposedactivityforcompliancewiththe CaliforniaEnvironmentalQualityAct(CEQA)andhasdeterminedthattheappropriationofgrant fundsisnota“Project”asdefinedundersection15378(b)(4)oftheStateCEQAGuidelinesbecause itinvolvesagovernmentalfiscalactivitywhichwillnotresultinapotentiallysignificantphysical impactontheenvironment.Therefore,pursuanttoSection15060(C)(3)oftheStateCEQAGuideline the activity is not subject to CEQA. BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Not Applicable DISCUSSION Thenon-profitCommunityHealthImprovementPartners(CHIP)recentlyreceivedfundingthrough theCenterforDiseaseControlandPrevention’sRacialandEthnicApproachestoCommunity Healthy(REACH)programtoaddresshealthdisparitiesinChulaVista.Specifically,theprojectwill worktopromotehealthyeatingandphysicalactivitytoLatinoslivingintheCity’s91910and91911 zip codes. YearTwofundingforCitystafftimeintheamountof$30,000willbeaddedtotheappropriationmade onJune2,2015foratotalof$60,000ofgrantfundingthroughthefederalfiscalyearending September 30, 2016. City of Chula VistaPage 1 of 2Printed on 10/8/2015 powered by Legistar™ ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 44 File#:15-0528, Item#: 3. TheprojectwillprovidetheCitywithtechnicalassistancetoreviewhealth-relateddraftGeneralPlan amendmentsandtodeveloppoliciestosupporthealthyfoodaccessandactivetransportation.In additiontotheCityofChulaVista,otherprojectpartnersincludetheUCSDSchoolofMedicine’s CenterforCommunityHealth,ScrippsMercyChulaVista,SweetwaterHighSchoolDistrict,Chula Vista Elementary School District, and the YMCA. DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT Staffhasreviewedthedecisioncontemplatedbythisactionandhasdeterminedthatitisnotsite specificandconsequently,the500-footrulefoundinCaliforniaCodeofRegulationssection18705.2 (a)(11),isnotapplicabletothisdecision.Staffisnotindependentlyaware,andhasnotbeen informedbyanyCityCouncilmember,ofanyotherfactthatmayconstituteabasisforadecision maker conflict of interest in this matter. LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS TheCity’sStrategicPlanhasfivemajorgoals:OperationalExcellence,EconomicVitality,Healthy Community,StrongandSecureNeighborhoodsandaConnectedCommunity.TheCity’sStrategic Planhasfivemajorgoals:OperationalExcellence,EconomicVitality,HealthyCommunity,Strong andSecureNeighborhoodsandaConnectedCommunity.TheREACHprojectdirectlysupportsthe Strategic Plan’s Healthy Community component by promoting physical activity and healthy eating. CURRENT YEAR FISCAL IMPACT TheREACHsub-awardwillprovide$30,000tosupportCitystafftimeassociatedwithphysical activityandhealthyeating-relatedpolicydevelopment.Approvaloftheresolutionwillresultinthe appropriationof$30,000totheOtherExpensesCategoryoftheFederalGrantsFund.Thiswillresult innonetfiscalimpacttotheCity’sFederalGrantsFundastheappropriationof$30,000isfullyoffset by unanticipated revenue. ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT Theproposedprojectwouldbeaone-timeactivity,sotherewouldbenoongoingfiscalimpact associated with it. ATTACHMENTS Attachment A - REACH Sub-Award Agreement (Year 2) Staff Contact: Stacey Kurz, Development Services Department City of Chula VistaPage 2 of 2Printed on 10/8/2015 powered by Legistar™ ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 45 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 46 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 47 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 48 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 49 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 50 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 51 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 52 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 53 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 54 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 55 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 56 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 57 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 58 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 59 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 60 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 61 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 62 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 63 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 64 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 65 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 66 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 67 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 68 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 69 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 70 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 71 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 72 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 73 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 74 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 75 RESOLUTION NO. __________ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING YEAR TWO OF A SUB-AWARD AGREEMENT WITH COMMUNITY HEALTH IMPROVEMENT PARTNERS FOR THE RACIAL AND ETHNIC APPROACHES TO COMMUNITY HEALTH PROJECT, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT AND THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE ALL OTHER DOCUMENTS NECESSARY TO IMPLEMENT THE AGREEMENT, AND APPROPRIATING $30,000 TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016 FEDERAL GRANTS FUNDTO BE OFFSET BY UNANTICIPATED REVENUE WHEREAS, jurisdictions are becoming increasingly aware that cities play a critical role in supporting the health and well-being of their communities, WHEREAS, the City has also been implementing its multi-department Healthy Chula Vistainitiative over the last year, which focuses on integrating public health considerations across municipal capital projects, plans, and services, WHEREAS,factors such as education levels, economic opportunities, health care access, transportation options, and public safety can lead to health disparities between different races and ethnicities, WHEREAS, Community Health Improvement Partners received funding through the Center for Disease Control and Prevention’s Racial and Ethnic Approaches to Community Healthy (REACH) program to promote healthy eating and physical activity to Latinos living in the City’s 91910 and 91911 zip codes,and WHEREAS, on June 2, 2015 the City approved year one funding for the REACH program which provided technical assistance and staff costs associated with a needs assessment of recreational programming in the city and health awareness promotions. WHEREAS, the year two project will also provide the City with no-cost technical assistance and staff time funding to develop policies and plans supporting healthy food access and active transportation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, that it: 1.Approves a year two Sub-Award Agreement with Community Healthy Improvement Partners for the REACH projectin the form presented,with such minor modifications as may be required or approved by the City Attorney, a copy of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk; ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 76 2.Authorizes and directs the Mayor to execute the Agreement and the City Manager to execute all other documents necessary to implement the Agreement; and 3.Approves a revenue-offset appropriation of $30,000to the Other Expenses categoryof the Federal GrantsFund for Fiscal Year 2016. Presented byApproved as to form by Kelly BroughtonGlen R. Googins Development ServicesDirectorCity Attorney ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 77 City of Chula Vista Staff Report File#:15-0400, Item#: 4. RESOLUTIONOFTHECITYCOUNCILOFTHECITYOFCHULAVISTAACCEPTINGAGRANT AWARDFROMTHECALIFORNIAOFFICEOFTRAFFICSAFETY,APPROPRIATING$210,000IN THEFEDERALGRANTFUND,ANDAUTHORIZINGTHEFIRECHIEFORHISDESIGNEETO EXECUTEALLRELATEDDOCUMENTATIONANDPROCUREMENTASSOCIATEDWITHTHIS GRANT (4/5 VOTE REQUIRED) RECOMMENDED ACTION Council adopt the resolution. SUMMARY TheCaliforniaOfficeofTrafficSafety(OTS)providesfundingassistancetostateandlocalpoliticalsubdivisionsofthe state on a competitive basis with the goal of improving traffic safety. TheFireDepartmenthasevaluateditsautoextricationequipmentanddeterminedthatextricationequipmentintheUrban Search&Rescue(US&R)apparatusandtruckcompaniesisnearingtheendofitsusefullifespanandisinneedof replacement. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ThisproposedactivityhasbeenreviewedforcompliancewiththeCaliforniaEnvironmentalQualityAct(CEQA)andithas beendeterminedthattheactivityisnota“Project”asdefinedunderSection15378oftheStateCEQAGuidelines becauseitwillnotresultinaphysicalchangeintheenvironment;therefore,pursuanttoSection15060(c)(3)oftheState CEQA Guidelines, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Thus, no environmental review is necessary. BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Not Applicable. DISCUSSION TheFireDepartmenthasdeterminedthatinordertokeepupwiththeneedsofagrowingcityandtheextrication challengesthatnewermodelvehiclespresent,itmustreplacetheexistingextricationequipmentintheUS&Randtruck apparatus,aswellasupgraderescuecapabilities.Extricationequipmentisusedbyfirstresponderstoextricatevictimsin trafficcollisions.UpdatingthisequipmentwillnotonlybenefittheCityofChulaVista,butviatheautomaticaidagreement withfiveneighboringcities,firstresponderswillbeabletodeliverbetterservicetothosecommunitieswhencalledfor service. OnJanuary27,2015theCityCouncilapprovedresolution2015-011.ThisresolutionauthorizedtheFireDepartmentto applyfortheCaliforniaOfficeofTrafficSafetyGrant(OTS),GrantsMadeEasy(GME),RegionalCollisionResponseand Extrication Improvement Program. OnJune2,2015theFireDepartmentreceivedalettertentativelyapprovingthefundingrequestintheamountof $210,000.ThefinalapprovedpacketwillbesenttoChulaVistaonceallOTSapprovalsignatureshavebeencompiled. ThegrantisduetostartonOctober1,2015andnoexpenditureswilltakeplacepriortoreceivingthefinalapproved packet.TheFireDepartmentwillusethisgranttopurchaseextricationequipmentfortheUS&Randtruckapparatus,to include: hydraulic rescue tool systems, auto extrication stabilization systems, and heavy lift air bag systems. Fire Department staff recommends City Council to accept the OTS grant award in the amount of $210,000, appropriate $210,000 in the Federal Grant Fund, and authorize the Fire Chief or his designee to execute all related documentation and procurement associated with this grant. City of Chula VistaPage 1 of 2Printed on 10/8/2015 powered by Legistar™ ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 78 File#:15-0400, Item#: 4. DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT Staffhasreviewedthedecisioncontemplatedbythisactionandhasdeterminedthatitisnotsitespecificand consequentlythe500-footrulefoundinCaliforniaCodeofRegulationssection18704.2(a)(1)isnotapplicabletothis decision.Staffisnotindependentlyaware,norhasstaffbeeninformedbyanyCityCouncilmember,ofanyotherfactthat may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter. LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS TheCity’sStrategicPlanhasfivemajorgoals:OperationalExcellence,EconomicVitality,HealthyCommunity,Strong andSecureNeighborhoodsandaConnectedCommunity.ThisresolutionsupportsthegoalofOperationalExcellence andHealthyCommunity.UpdatingextricationequipmentwillallowtheFireDepartmenttoprovideimprovedservicetothe community. The new equipment will assist with rescues; improve firefighter safety, and overall operational efficiency. CURRENT YEAR FISCAL IMPACT Approvalofthisresolutionwillresultinappropriationsof$118,550totheCapitalCategoryand$91,450totheSupplies andServicesCategoryintheFederalGrantFundbudgetinFiscalYear2015-16forcostsassociatedwiththepurchase of rescue equipment. The grant does not require a match and it does not have a general fund impact. ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT Thepurchaseofthisequipmentreplacesexistingequipmentthathasreachedtheendofitsusefullifespan.Future replacement for this equipment will be budgeted as part of the normal budgeting process for Fire Department. ATTACHMENTS 1.Resolution 2.Grant Agreement 3.Schedule A 4.Schedule B 5.Schedule B-1 Staff Contact: Madeline Smith City of Chula VistaPage 2 of 2Printed on 10/8/2015 powered by Legistar™ ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 79 RESOLUTION NO. __________ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING A GRANT AWARD FROM THE CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY (OTS), APPROPRIATING $210,000 IN THE FEDERAL GRANT FUND, AND AUTHORIZING THE FIRE CHIEF OR HIS DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE ALL RELATED DOCUMENTATION AND PROCUREMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS GRANT WHEREAS, The California Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) provides funding assistance to state and local political subdivisions of the state on a competitive basis with the goal of improving traffic safety; and WHEREAS, The Fire Department has evaluated its auto extrication equipment and determined that extrication equipment in the Urban Search & Rescue (US&R) apparatus and trucks has reached the end of its useful lifespan and is in need of replacement; and WHEREAS, on January 27, 2015 the City Council approved resolution 2015-011 authorizing the Fire Department to apply for the California Office of Traffic Safety Grant (OTS), Grants Made Easy (GME), Regional Collision Response and Extrication Improvement Program; and WHEREAS, on June 2, 2015 the Fire Department received a letter from California OTS tentatively approving the funding request in the amount of $210,000 for purchase extrication equipment for the US&R and truck apparatus; and WHEREAS, the grant is due to start on October 1, 2015 and no expenditures will take place prior to receiving the final approved packet; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED with the above findings incorporated herein, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby: Accept the California, Office of Traffic Safety, Grants Made Easy, Regional Collision Response and Extrication Improvement Program grant award in the amount of $210,000 Appropriate $210,000 in the Federal Grant Fundbudget in Fiscal Year 2015-16, as follows: $118,550to the Capital Category and $91,450to the Supplies and Services Category for costs associated with the purchase of rescue equipment, and Authorize the Fire Chief or his designee to execute all relateddocumentation and procurement associated with this grant. ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 80 Presented byApproved as to form by James Geering Glen R. Googins Fire ChiefCity Attorney ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 81 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 82 EMS(EMS) MERGENCYEDICALERVICES SA CHEDULE GD RANTESCRIPTION GN.EM1603 RANTO P1 AGE 1.PS ROBLEM TATEMENT Victims trapped as a result of traffic collisions are predominantly critical medical patients that require immediate medical treatment. Their survival is significantly affected by the time necessary to extricate, stabilize and transport to the receiving Hospital Emergency Room. Of these steps, the time necessary to stabilize and transport the victim are constant, with the variable being extrication time. Extrication time is significantly impacted by emerging trends in the automotive industry. In order for auto manufacturers to meet new safety standards and exceed their competition, they incorporate High Strength Low Alloy (HSLA) and Ultra High Strength Steel (UHSS) in their automotive body construction. These new construction materials have quickly exceeded the capabilities of aging auto extrication tools used by first responders. Current National Fire Protection Association Standards (NFPA) address the capabilities of auto extrication tools to ensure new automotive body construction does not defeat first responders attempting to cut, spread or dismantle a deformed vehicle from around a trapped victim. In order for aging auto extrication equipment to defeat late model automotive body construction, first responders are forced to remove trapped victims where the HSLA and UHSS is not. First responders are also forced to dismantle more of the vehicle to gain access and safely remove trapped victims. These strategies increase the time necessary to remove trapped victims. Additional problems are connectedto the use of HSLA and UHSS. Due to the extended extrication times and additional dismantling, vehicle stabilization becomes increasingly more important. Vehicles involved in traffic collisions requiring victim extrication pose significant safety issuesto both first responders and victims. As the vehicle is removed from around a victim, it becomes more and more unstable and requires first responders to install stabilization equipment to maintain a predictable and safe environment throughout the entire extrication. Related equipment used to extricate trapped victims as a result of traffic collisions include Heavy Lift Air Bag Systems. Per manufacturer standards, these Heavy Lift Air Bag Systems expire after a 10 year service life. Currently the Chula Vista Fire Department maintains three sets of Heavy Lift Air Bag Systems, of which all are beyond their 10 year service life. Equipment being requested will have a significant impact to our region. Currently the City of Chula Vista, City of San Diego, National City, City of Imperial Beach and the Bonita/Sunnyside Fire Protection District participate in an Automatic Aid Agreement. This provides a boarder-drop between all agencies for the closest appropriate equipment to respond to varying calls for service. This area is detailed in the attached American Community Survey (ACS) and Next Generation Incident Command System Map and covers over 100 square miles with a total population of 472,000. With the acquisition of NFPA compliant auto extrication equipment and stabilization equipment will provide first responders with the best possible capability to reduce extrication time. From 2011 to 2013 the region described above extricated 141 trapped victims from traffic collisions. Over this three year period, the average extrication time was 48 minutes from when the first unit arrived until the patient was transported. OTS-38b (Rev. 4/15) ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 83 EMS(EMS) MERGENCYEDICALERVICES SA CHEDULE GD RANTESCRIPTION GN.EM1603 RANTO P2 AGE A.Traffic Data Summary: Regional Traffic Collision Experience Over the Past Three Years: Data: Using local data (not OTS Rankings or SWITRS), complete the tables below. Include all data agency/location for each that will receive equipment from this grant. 201220132014 Collision Type CollisionsVictimsCollisionsVictimsCollisionsVictims FatalN/AN/AN/AN/A Injury479630543946 For each station requesting equipment, explain the following under Problem Description: whether the station is located in a rural or urban area (list the community or city), the type of collisions (high speed, curvy roadway, over the side), and any section of highway(s) involved. Also indicate whether the station currently has extrication equipment and the age of the equipment. If the station doesn’t have equipment, indicate the nearest equipment and estimated time of arrival. Station Name and Number: Fire Station 3 (US&R 53) Problem Description: Chula Vista Fire Station 3 houses US&R 53 (Urban Search & Rescue), which is a California Office of Emergency Service (CAL OES) Type I US&R/Heavy Rescue. Thisarea is an urban area of the City of Chula Vistawith collisions ranging from high speed, curvy road and over the side. This station is approximately ½ mile from Interstate 805, three miles from State Route 905, four miles from State Route 125, five miles from Interstate 5 and five miles from State Route 54 for a total of 70 miles of highway within an approximate 12 minute response time. US&R 53 is staffed with one captain, one engineer and two firefighters daily. It carries a full set of hydraulic extrication equipment that was purchased in 2002 (13 years old). STATISTICS201120122013 Total Number Of Responses (All Calls For Service)137313811714 Total Number Of Traffic Collision Related Calls201224150 Number Of Traffic Collision Victims Requiring Extrication In Region282620 Number Of Victims Where Mutual Aid Extrication Services Were 7118 Provided To Other Jurisdictions Average Response Time For Appropriate Equipment (Receipt Of Call 9:218:137:32 To Arrival At Collision Site) Average Extrication Time (Arrival At Site To Transport)56:1248:0454:03 OTS-38b (Rev. 4/15) ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 84 EMS(EMS) MERGENCYEDICALERVICES SA CHEDULE GD RANTESCRIPTION GN.EM1603 RANTO P3 AGE Station Name and Number: Fire Station 1 (Truck 51) Problem Description: Chula Vista Fire Station 1 houses Engine 51, Truck 51 and Battalion 51. This area is an urban area of the City of Chula Vistawith high speed and over the side collisions. This station is approximately one mile from Interstate 5, one mile from State Route 54, two miles from interstate 805, six miles fromState Route 125 and six miles from State Route 905 for a total of 70 miles of highway within an approximate 15 minute response time. Truck 51 is staffed with one captain, one engineer and two firefighters daily. It carries a full set of hydraulic extrication equipment that was purchased in 2002 (13 years old). STATISTICS201120122013 Total Number Of Responses (All Calls For Service)120911741572 Total Number Of Traffic Collision Related Calls15614296 Number Of Traffic Collision Victims Requiring Extrication In Region16614 Number Of Victims Where Mutual Aid Extrication Services Were 1310 Provided To Other Jurisdictions Average Response Time For Appropriate Equipment (Receipt Of Call 8:056:306:15 To Arrival At Collision Site) Average Extrication Time (Arrival At Site To Transport)38:1727:2746:09 Station Name and Number: Fire Station 7 (Truck 57) Problem Description: Chula Vista Fire Station 7 houses Engine 57, Truck 57 and Battalion 57. This area is an urban area of the City of Chula Vistawith collisions ranging from high speed, curvy road and over the side. This station is approximately one mile from State Route 125, three miles from Interstate 805, six miles from State Route 905, seven miles from State Route 54 and eight miles from Interstate 5 for a total of 70 miles of highway within an approximate 15 minute response time. Truck 57 is staffed with one captain, one engineer and two firefighters daily. It carries a full set of hydraulic extrication equipment that was purchased in 2003 (12 years old). OTS-38b (Rev. 4/15) ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 85 EMS(EMS) MERGENCYEDICALERVICES SA CHEDULE GD RANTESCRIPTION GN.EM1603 RANTO P4 AGE STATISTICS201120122013 Total Number Of Responses (All Calls For Service)372387437 Total Number Of Traffic Collision Related Calls485721 Number Of Traffic Collision Victims Requiring Extrication In Region12910 Number Of Victims Where Mutual Aid Extrication Services Were 012 Provided To Other Jurisdictions Average Response Time For Appropriate Equipment (Receipt Of Call 13:549:406:19 To Arrival At Collision Site) Average Extrication Time (Arrival At Site To Transport)51:4655:1354:57 2.PM ERFORMANCEEASURES A.Goals: 1)To reduce the extrication time of persons trapped from traffic collisions. 2)To increase safety for first responders and persons trapped from traffic collisions. B.Objectives: 1)To purchase and replace 3 fully equipped extrication systems at Fire Station 3, Fire Station 1 and Fire Station 7 2)To purchase and place 3 auto extrication stabilization systems at Fire Station 3, Fire Station 1 and Fire Station 7. 3)To purchase and replace 3 heavy lift air bag systems at Fire Station 3, Fire Station 1 and Fire Station 7. 4)To train 116 firefighters in the use of the new equipment. 5)To decrease the average extrication time of trapped victims from 48:00 minutes to 43:00 minutes. 6)To display the OTS funded equipment 10 days during Public Safety Fairs, community festivals and or other Department or community events. 7)In the event grant funded equipment is used to save a life, OTS will be notified of the facts involving the incident. OTS-38b (Rev. 4/15) ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 86 EMS(EMS) MERGENCYEDICALERVICES SA CHEDULE GD RANTESCRIPTION GN.EM1603 RANTO P5 AGE 3.MP ETHOD OF ROCEDURE st A.Phase 1 -Program Preparation, Training and Implementation(1Quarter of Grant Year) Determine specific equipment requirements. Request equipment vendor price quotation for the required equipment per host agency requirement. Submit purchase orders to equipment vendors for purchase of the equipment. Prepare and execute Memorandums of Understanding (MOU) with recipient agencies. Media Requirements Issue a press release announcing the kick-off of the grant by November 15.The kick-off press releases and media advisories, alerts, and materials must be emailed to the OTS Public Information Officer at pio@ots.ca.gov, and copied to your OTS Coordinator, for approval 14 days prior to the issuance date of the release. B.Phase 2 -Program Operations (ThroughoutGrant Year) Inventory the new equipment following delivery. Disperse equipment to identified recipient agencies. Plan a media event announcing the grant funded equipment. Recipient agencies will identify training needs and objectives and coordinate instructional staff to conduct a high quality trainingprogram for their respective agency. Recipient agencies will develop a preventive maintenance schedule for the new equipment following manufacturers’ recommendations. Media Requirements Send all grant-related activity press releases, media advisories, alerts and general public materials to the OTS Public Information Officer (PIO) at pio@ots.ca.gov, with a copy to your OTS Coordinator. a)If an OTS template-based press release is used, the OTS PIO and Coordinator should be copied when the release is distributed to the press. If an OTS template is not used, or is substantially OTS-38b (Rev. 4/15) ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 87 EMS(EMS) MERGENCYEDICALERVICES SA CHEDULE GD RANTESCRIPTION GN.EM1603 RANTO P6 AGE changed, a draft press release shallbe sent to the OTS PIO for approval. Optimum lead time would be 10-20 days prior to the release dateto ensure adequate turn-around time. b)Press releases reporting the results of grant activities such as enforcement operations are exempt from the recommended advance approval process, but still should be copied to the OTS PIO and Coordinator when the release is distributed to the press. c)Activities such as warrant service operationsand court stings that could be compromised by advanced publicity are exempt from pre-publicity, but are encouraged to offer embargoed media coverage and to report the results. Use the following standard language in all press, media, and printed materials: Funding for this program was provided by a grant from the California Office of Traffic Safety, through the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Email the OTS PIO at pio@ots.ca.govand copy your OTS Coordinator at least 30 days in advance, a short description of any significant grant-related traffic safety event or program so OTS has sufficient notice to arrange for attendance and/or participation in the event. Submit a draft or rough-cut of all printed or recorded material (brochures, posters, scripts, artwork, trailer graphics, etc.) to the OTS PIO at pio@ots.ca.govand copy your OTS Coordinator for approval 14 days prior to the production or duplication. Include the OTS logo, space permitting, on grant-funded print materials; consult your OTS Coordinator for specifics. C.Phase 3 –Data Collection & Reporting(Throughout Grant Year) Agencies are required to collect and report quarterly, appropriate data that supports the progress of goals and objectives. Statistical data relating to the grant goals and objectives will be collected, analyzed, and incorporated in Quarterly Performance Reports (QPRs).QPRs for the quarter ending September 30 will include year-to-date comparisons of goals and objectives. If required, a separate quarterly data reporting form will be completed each quarter and submitted as part of the QPR. Reports will compare actual grant accomplishments with the planned accomplishments. They will include information concerning changes made by the Grant Director in planning and guiding the grant efforts. Reports shall be completed and submitted in accordance with OTS requirements as specified in the Grant Program Manual. OTS-38b (Rev. 4/15) ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 88 EMS(EMS) MERGENCYEDICALERVICES SA CHEDULE GD RANTESCRIPTION GN.EM1603 RANTO P7 AGE 4.ME ETHOD OF VALUATION Using the data compiled during the grant, the Grant Director will complete the “Final Evaluation” section in the fourth/final Quarterly Performance Report (QPR). The Final Evaluation should provide a briefsummary of the grant’s accomplishments, challenges and significant activities. This narrative should also include whether goals and objectives were met, exceeded, or an explanation of why objectives were not completed. 5.AS DMINISTRATIVE UPPORT This program has full support of the City of Chula Vista. Everyeffort will be made to continue the activities after the grant conclusion. OTS-38b (Rev. 4/15) ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 89 SCHEDULE B DETAILED BUDGET ESTIMATE GRANT NO. EM1603 TOTAL CATALOG FUND NUMBERFUND DESCRIPTION AMOUNT NUMBER (CFDA) $ 210,000.00 State and Community Highway Safety 40220.600 FISCAL YEAR ESTIMATES TOTAL COST COST CATEGORY 10/1/15 thru 9/30/16 TO GRANT A. PERSONNEL COSTS CFDAFY-1 Positions and Salaries Full-Time N/A Overtime N/A Category Sub-Total $ -$ - B. TRAVEL EXPENSE N/A $ - Category Sub-Total $ -$ - C. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES N/A $ - Category Sub-Total $ -$ - D. EQUIPMENT Hydraulic Rescue Tool Systems20.600$ 147,190.00$147,190.00 Auto Extrication Stabilization Systems20.600$ 19,647.00$19,647.00 Heavy Lift Air Bag Systems20.600$ 43,163.00$43,163.00 Category Sub-Total$ 210,000.00$210,000.00 E. OTHER DIRECT COSTS N/A $ - Category Sub-Total $ -$ - F. INDIRECT COSTS N/A $ - Category Sub-Total $ -$ - GRANT TOTAL $ 210,000.00$210,000.00 OTS-38d (Rev. 4/15) Page 1 of 1 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 90 SB-1 CHEDULE GN.EM1602 RANTO BN Page 1 UDGET ARRATIVE PC ERSONNELOSTS N/A TE RAVELXPENSE N/A CS ONTRACTUALERVICES N/A E QUIPMENT 2-Hydraulic Rescue Tool Systems-Hydraulic rescue tool systems include cutters, spreaders, rams, power units and hydraulic hose. These systems are used to cut, spread and dismantle vehicles from around trapped victims involved in traffic collisions. These systems include ram extensions and ram plates as accessories to each overall system. There will be installation costs that will be funded by the City of Chula Vista. 2-Auto Extrication Stabilization Systems- Auto extrication stabilization systems include support struts, ratchet straps, chains and chain hooks. These systems are used to support and stabilize vehicles involved in traffic collisions to provide a safer environment for first responders and victims. 2-Heavy Lift Air Bag Systems-Heavy lift air bag systems include air bags, regulators, controllers, hoses and relief valves. These systems are used to lift and/or move vehicles involved in traffic collisions to gain access to trapped victims. ODC THERIRECTOSTS N/A IC NDIRECTOSTS N/A PI ROGRAMNCOME There will be no program income generated from this grant. OTS-38f (Rev. 4/15) ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 91 City of Chula Vista Staff Report File#:15-0527, Item#: 5. CONSIDERATIONOFTHEHEALTHYCOMMUNITIESCONCEPTSFORTHECITY’SGENERAL PLAN RESOLUTIONOFTHECITYCOUNCILOFTHECITYOFCHULAVISTAAPPROVING AMENDMENTSTOTHECITY’SGENERALPLANTOINCLUDEHEALTHANDWELLBEING POLICIES AND OBJECTIVES RECOMMENDED ACTION Council conduct the public hearing and adopt the resolution. SUMMARY OnMarch5,2015CityCouncilheldaworkshopontheHealthyChulaVistaInitiative,includinga presentationontheincorporationofHealthyCommunityconceptsintotheCity’sGeneralPlan.At thistime,staffisbringingforwardtheproposedGeneralPlanamendmentsasanimportantstepin building a better and healthier Chula Vista. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW TheDevelopmentServicesDirectorhasreviewedtheproposedactivityforcompliancewiththe CaliforniaEnvironmentalQualityAct(CEQA)andhasdeterminedthattheproposedactivitywas adequatelycoveredinthepreviouslyadoptedGeneralPlanUpdateFinalEnvironmentalImpact Report(FEIR05-01)becausetheproposedobjectivesandpoliciesareconsistentwiththepreviously adopted General Plan Update. Notwithstandingtheforegoing,theDevelopmentServicesDirectorhasalsodeterminedthatthereis nopossibilitythattheactivitymayhaveasignificanteffectontheenvironmentbecausetheproposed GeneralPlanpolicieswillresultinHealthyCommunitiespoliciesandprogramsandnophysical changetotheenvironment.Therefore,pursuanttoSection15061(b)(3)oftheStateCEQA Guidelines the activity is not subject to CEQA. Thus, no environmental review is required. BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION ThePlanningCommissionrecommendedapproval(5-0-2)oftheamendmentsattheirSeptember9, 2015meeting,withoneaddition(#23inmatrix)toSection7.9toaddlanguageregardingthe encouragement of roundabouts, as applicable. DISCUSSION Background Theimportanceofplanningforpublichealthbecameevidentduringtheindustrializationperiodofthe 1900’s,withtheincompatibilityoflanduses(factoriesnearhousing)andtheimproperhandlingof wasteresultinginrampantdiseaseincities.Withthegrowthofurbansprawlandtheriseof suburbia,thedirectlinkbetweenplanningandpublichealthhadbecomelessevident.Inlightof City of Chula VistaPage 1 of 4Printed on 10/8/2015 powered by Legistar™ ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 92 File#:15-0527, Item#: 5. moderndayhealthissues,weareonceagainrecognizingtheimportantrelationshipbetweenthe built environment and overall health of a community and its residents. AccordingtotheCountyofSanDiegoHealth&HumanServicesAgencyPublicHealthServices, diabetes,cancer,heart,andrespiratorydiseasesaccountforover50%ofdeathsintheCountyand createasubstantialeconomicburden(over$4billiondollarsindirecttreatmentexpenditures). Propernutrition,increasedphysicalactivity,andcreatingahealthyplacetolive,workandplay,are proventohaveasignificantimpactonreducingthesediseases.Bestpracticesthatdirectlyand indirectlyaddresscommunityhealthimprovementnotonlyincreaseoverallhealth,butimprove quality of life. Healthy Chula Vista Initiative Jurisdictionsarebecomingincreasinglyawarethatcitiesplayacriticalroleinsupportingthehealth andwell-beingoftheircommunities.Therearevariousfactorsthatcontributetoacommunity’s health.Recognizingtheimportanceofhealthtoacommunity,theChulaVistaCityCounciladopted Section3.1.1oftheCity’sStrategicPlan,whichsupportstheimplementationofpoliciesand programs that support the goal of creating a Healthy Community. Overthelastyear,Citystaffhasbeenworkingthroughamulti-departmentalteamtocreatethe HealthyChulaVista(HCV)initiative.TheHCVinitiativefocusesonintegratingpublichealth considerationsandinsertingthecomponentsofaHealthyCommunityacrossCitycapitalprojects, programs, plans, and services. SANDAG Grant InJanuary2014,theCityofChulaVistareceiveda$100,000.00TRANSNETSmartGrowthIncentive GrantfromSANDAGtofurtherdeveloptheCity’sgoalofcreatingtheHCVInitiative.Thescopeof workforthegrantincludedthedevelopmentofacity-wideHealthyCommunityplanningeffortthat would,amendtheGeneralPlantoincludeadditionalhealthandwell-beingrelatedgoals,policiesand objectives,developaCompleteStreetsPolicy(whichwasadoptedbyCouncilAugust18,2015)and aminimumoftwoCompleteStreetdesignillustrationsdemonstratinghowCompleteStreetprinciples could be applied in Chula Vista. General Plan ItisunderstoodthataGeneralPlanservesasthe“constitution”orblueprintforfuturegrowthand developmentofaCitybyestablishingrelatedgoals,objectivesandpoliciesacrossabroadrangeof subjects.Whilebestknownforsettingthepolicyforacceptablelandusesanddensities,thescope ofChulaVista’sGeneralPlanisfarbroader,anditsfoundationscanandshouldincludearoadmap for a healthier City as well. WhilethetopicofHealthyCommunitieswasintroducedintheCity’sGeneralPlanin2005and additionalpoliciesaddedin2012,theproposedGeneralPlanamendmentsofferawiderbreadthand strongerfoundationtoaddressmanyofthepublichealthconcernsthatexisttoday.Theproposed amendmentswillexpandupontheexistingpoliciesthatareincludedinboththeLandUseand TransportationElementandtheEnvironmentalElementandwillexpandthevisionforhealthandwell -beingbyweavingHealthyCommunitieslanguage,objectivesandpoliciesthroughouttheGeneral Plan. City of Chula VistaPage 2 of 4Printed on 10/8/2015 powered by Legistar™ ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 93 File#:15-0527, Item#: 5. Proposed Amendments InanefforttosupporthealthylivingandhealthybehaviorsinChulaVista,staffisproposing amendmentsthatrangefromtheinclusionofHealthyCommunityconceptsthroughouttheGeneral Plan,aswellasrevisionstoexistingpoliciesandobjectivesandnewlycreatedonesintheareasof land use, transportation, economic development, recreation, and environmental quality and justice. TheproposedamendmentsarelistedbyGeneralPlanElement,Section,andrevisedtextinthe attachedmatrix(Attachment1)withabriefsummaryoftheproposedchangesbychapterlisted below. Vision and Themes TheVisionandThemesoftheCity’sGeneralPlanpromotethecommunity’scorevaluesthatserveto guidetheGeneralPlanObjectivesandPolicies.ItisproposedtorevisethetitleofTheme5,andto add a discussion of Healthy Community components to the subtext of Themes 2, 4, 5, and 8. Land Use and Transportation TheLanduseandTransportationElementoftheGeneralPlanisthecomprehensiveplanforthe City’sfuturegrowth.ItisproposedtoincludeadiscussiononCompleteStreets(theprovisionofa balanced,multimodaltransportationnetworkthatmeetstheneedsofallusers)andtheadditionof policies and objectives for building a healthy and sustainable community. Economic Development TheEconomicDevelopmentElementoftheGeneralPlanfocusesonenhancingahighqualityoflife forallChulaVistaresidents.InthisChapter,languageisproposedthatsupportsahealthyand sustainablecommunityforeveryone,withpoliciesandobjectivesthatsupportenvironmentally friendly business development and a healthier workforce. Public Facilities and Services ThisElementincludespublicfacilitiesandservicesthatsupportandenrichthecommunity,suchas: parksandrecreationcentersandartandculturalfacilitiesandprograms.ThisElementalso discussestheCity’ssupportingroleinhealthandhumanserviceprograms.Languageisproposed thatencouragesCitypartnershipswithhealthadvocates,supportofhealthandwell-beingeducation programs,andthepoliciesandobjectivesthatsupportthedevelopmentofsafeandaccessible recreational uses citywide. Environmental ThisElementestablishesthepolicyframeworkforsustainabilityandresponsiblestewardship. HealthyCommunitylanguageandpoliciesandobjectivesthatcoverawiderbreadthofpublichealth issuesareproposedthroughoutthisChapter.Thefocusoftheamendmentsistoexpandupon existingenvironmentalqualitypoliciesandobjectives,whilestrengtheningthefocusofenvironmental justiceanddevelopingnewpoliciesandobjectivesthatemphasizehealthylivingandhealthy behaviors and equally high levels of environmental protection, for everyone. DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT StaffhasreviewedthepropertyholdingsoftheCityCouncilmembersandhasfoundnoproperty holdingswithin500feetoftheboundariesofthepropertywhichisthesubjectofthisaction. Consequently,thisitemdoesnotpresentadisqualifyingrealproperty-relatedfinancialconflictof City of Chula VistaPage 3 of 4Printed on 10/8/2015 powered by Legistar™ ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 94 File#:15-0527, Item#: 5. interestunderCaliforniaCodeofRegulationsTitle2,section18705.2(a)(11),forpurposesofthe Political Reform Act (Cal. Gov’t Code §87100,et seq.). Staffisnotindependentlyaware,andhasnotbeeninformedbyanyCityCouncilmember,ofany other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter. LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS TheCity’sStrategicPlanhasfivemajorgoals:OperationalExcellence,EconomicVitality,Healthy Community,StrongandSecureNeighborhoodsandaConnectedCommunity.Thisitemsupports Goal3byprovidingthebackboneforallpolicyandprogrammingthroughtheamendmentsofhealthy concepts in the General Plan. CURRENT YEAR FISCAL IMPACT ThereisnocurrentyearfiscalimpactrelatedtothisactionasCityCouncilisbeingaskedtoconsider the incorporation of Healthy Community concepts into the City’s General Plan. ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT Theongoingfiscalimpactisunknown;thefiscalimpactsofincorporatingHealthyCommunity conceptsintofuturedevelopmentprojectswillbeevaluatedwhensuchprojectsaredefinedand brought forward for approval. ATTACHMENTS 1.Healthy Communities General Plan Amendments Matrix Staff Contact:Stacey Kurz, Development Services Department Lynnette Tessitore-Lopez, Economic Development Department City of Chula VistaPage 4 of 4Printed on 10/8/2015 powered by Legistar™ ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 95 W N F+ -� y�a g-[_{ -i � m 1 =_eF z � n s � � � O � _' '< � 3 'o � _=;.�. 'o v, 'D 3 ti 'iSi 3 � a < i S � n s = v : i 3 u � - a -° < � < � � _`-� oi y n �ssr � � � p ^ `. n a- a � o -T�� v, 3 � < ' _ ' c p Q � N _ d O �^.0 a � Q � Q y Gv' m m � -'-��.c Q � __' � N �� � Q1< fD m � in x m N _�, x � `C_. � w „ _ �_. � : m m m fl- Q p O"" O O `�3-� _ � 7.< a � � � -�� �p � _ n n �o' O �' N F+ � �' 3 � � � ryryry �` � � - y .� � _ p = •� = O � � n � � � S O � � C 1 � � 6 y 6 C < `G s�F N C _ p � y � a y a �' -. n n < o ^� u a n ��$ ' < o � � � o � c n � O = oi c _ < n m m Q x �j _ ro o ni E' ' m ^_ (. ' o ^ m � ... �,. v � = D s n � � (D:=. a _. n � � N C " � v, o � n o n - < � ° ° < co° c v �3" ' ^ = < � � � o � � � I� � " � ^ ' � ? rao C (�T .. � r y � S U _ T _ o - � ? w N �p .Z�y'.". � � m =' p �! N � ° ^ 'c 3 — ° ' g 3. o .-. ° v' ���a _ _ _ � ,'�, " � = `° n - w . � Q ... ' `? 'c u f^p T C c o - u m y^ o'� v' = ' < � ^ °— - 'o T ..��� ^ � � S � � u � T �. v,: r; � o Q T 'o_ 3 'o °_ c. m ''� o ° � 41� ° � ° y " 3 �o a � � y u - N io � n -3 F � c n 3 m a� v s = _ � n =,' ro � � o o - = � v _ 5 � a _ D.= — - c � <. u o � I5 = � < < o m ^ m v _ a � o_< .� c � m � � o � a �i. � ; � (° n '" 0 3 T x � °<_ � - c � �°a � C o �� G = p L' lD >. 3 (0 � C - C S O. � 3 Sl p /��'�� � fJ C '- C 3 .-. Y O N � O 9 �p O C fD N 1..l�. = ^ N O � J o n ^ o ^ a o o � < � n = J � y - o ��� fD a -fD. n � °-� � v s u a y � o y s � � � ti _ _ d G F in a � c n n ° m � in � n 3��� � � ^ � m � � O m � s c � � o .Q „ e-9� _ J.- c � — f '" a ° � o , � ' a a m G N o 0 <. .. n � j n fj - _ � y y '} . J _ O N N C . �. S fl � � (9 j � �n = � J S N L_ n c G < � � T o � n ° � o n � j '�".:: _ � u n' o u � ' ^ � - � y o � fl- '�� - •- ti - o n p f � �- o � � v'.� � C l N - 3 G C ef O � � - ooc _ � i cnm ? � N n n � � �-�' _ � � � .� w _ � o � o �� _ O O n y � a '� � � � �. a � � . - -� v o � n �' j m vi _`x-�_ C _ � n ° -:::� _ � m ^ p o ^ a G � c y r• _ c _::. v ' n C � C� w � J � o � < �° : _ o Ia ��: � .��_ �� `_.` -.�� � -4� N - � T'J � +c�... :_. fC� Cl�; m -'y-', x ?' � � ��' w � Ae Q p :�3= � 3� N ° ,3� a o :�.� n c a .3-. ��"_ .��: H� �za', J �r. rv .. � < n p 3 v+ m ' n o ° !T�' p N - 7 C -' G � � t� U [i� ^ < a � r a - � < c t m n < � � o _ ^. c"i - . n n < _ '°. = m -' � � � 'o _ m a .n' - °„ � = 3 ^ m o t n o � r+ ? o ��: " - Q = c n o � o �' j c o G ,_, ° � o " � � c � 3 c `'^" ° ` '� `° a n o � a o � �1'i .� _ � _ a � 'm a _ = �-��,' T „ - ` _ -�D� n o ' � � v S C o � l � � vS.' ° n � p^ � ?3.r ❑ � m .�. 0 7 p m � S = � � ��'[ ? p ... n o �!'. o c r� p � v ° .- m � � 9 n 'Z's c n N ; 0 2" ^ _ � _ � j � n _ l c a � ���' n c _ � d ' G r. 2 � o n C o o m � = u c - _ 5�': � c� » - = c _ o � ': < - :n a, �, � 3 jtlj� � _ � m vi . 9 0 ° _ n = - . c c n :- � ? � � r. 2 ^ ? �n N ^ ,3� � j �- � � � � O. G C L, 9- .+ J G O C � � (1 - '+�- C O � � � 7 � J -� � � c� � 7 n l � S � �D- _ n = T �+ - � °-. � a c � v o .v m n m o � ro c ° _ ' n '�; - ^ !o ? � � - n =' n a O � - s N L V S � N � Q .�-. C � n = � < O .�_ c o 7 = m n c ' '� > G n [' ^ o' O a �- `^ a p �3i� v r n c �+ f� f1 S '�'. -i C = C � � _ `� n .Q' ^ � n c � N" " -c � n u y � n i> � = = � j < -' � n = � � u v� _ �' ` �' < � �n n .�::� � � = � n � �� �: c c > > � m n n o 0 0 � � m � _ � � c % _ � U y �:-. c io � " �'' o ? � u � `" ° ' � _ = �� � Y :�'° � - ^ c n o � < - :� Q c c � m � � � � o _�,d g -� ^ ' (p n -� � 3 o c m n � < '°'?c � °- o c 3 ' = c -' � o � n a n _ ' n o < o .. .,, o - '^ - _ n � � n G o _ - ' n �' c' G r• S u c : �. '� J c. o F. G1 � r� N .^. .�. F n " F o ��-�� l n °_ p T o F m m = n c ° o � r: ° a ^ . .'z f � _ n o c � s o n � m � C n F �x n a' S m � v c ^ �.3�—` u E � _ � N - r. � ' � _•-+ � � �� .. = f -� � c `° = c � F < c " N •' o � � 3 ^ m = � <_, � m n = ? _ ."'-� � ? o _ - n c v+ r, m ' r O = r _ ... c � n n v c y 2 ' o �^ � ' � � = _ST� C n� � fJ �' lD n N v.' :J � ?' G1� '- n n 6 �.-r �tn yi. tn a °�.��'�'�=`. _�_ -1 1� y ^ p �^ �J � 3 '�if«. t ~ V lD - ?f D O � O � � 7 � � ^ � N d � .�-. S '� r � �- u :1'='�5 '1 � j 'O_ -:-j= �n ^ 2 � '-6.`-�� O O � W � — � 7 'v � n .� m t4 YS O _ �, � y;� n � � T � — d rv - � _ :e.a rlp p '_ _ ll'1 w �� r � 1:;, � :�>y. � x .�: � N �" n � •�- � w t� m �A� m � a p O� � ' a -3� � ; 3 w ci a :3� � H .� O_ m � n �3�. ry �. F+ � �; d y � � a u � y S oi � o. ... a v D � T . � iT. — �' � n v�i n — u r^v = �n m p �. a v �^ y n .�i� o � � � a � o " j n.w' � a n a 7 o ao � 'n: = n c „ � � � c m o � s ro o' _. d � m �„ - � � i ._ u _ � �° o n (, < • • • `c aN- � a =�' c m � o y E. o � n °-' ' � � � n n a o o� o ° oo ��� � � � o � � w � 0 3 = r'�, ° < �, � 3 n c m =.' o+ (9= � - o o � T = ° 3 3 � ^ 3 N 3 � n u o � c a �3 � o ^ � o- e� � � = 3 � `° � °_. `° m ? = n � ° 'sf��` ❑- N � c o N p N " � ° v�i o ^ � = � -.< � n ^ - m u a � .. v � �� s " ro � � t�n a ^ ¢� r> j n< � � N .� o� > > �'- Q f. �. N H � n m _ s ' 0 3 .-. D �� `�ro ° = etD^o c � � a J � '�_ = m 7 19 0 � ? C p3 � o � ° a a 3 -. ^ �- fD 3 ° � �.' ? ^ n c °- n o � n � :a ° �'. m � m m � � � ? ° m .�_ v. p_ o, n £ � - n a?a � � � o o d � <. � � o � � ,3� � N ti � N � n o � = n a v �. n v� p � - n c - , o � n � v. N � � � s 3 � n 2 � � N � � c � ° o' :- = c � - _, n m � o � o (+ �+ < c, _ n a i� c o, � `° 3 3 � S � � o_v ��^', N n ¢ � c n a' G '� v � 3 fD aa , � O �_ � � :+' � < n N -' p m d � d � •X- (7 n JC ^ O ��.L o = 3: o ^ °.:, f � T � r� °' = ° < m m' < � „� 3 � °-' tAO QQ�' o '^ o � < r� .-. � T u 3 '^ 3 3 `° u > a � c � v � � a 2 � o n o L o- o n u' °: v n ' '�� c ° -" � � � ; ; rv 3 � � ° � � T� � , s �a � � > j "' ° u m � -a � = _ � n c � c � � ,(��. o s '^ � � � n � � � r� �a < "' = N � C v i o A `3= n Q. � �- � m s � m �� �,. � '^ ~ o � fD p_D s x rF� v i n j n � ° � v U _ m 'o ^ m oo c � a ._._ '� c � n � � m � � � y� - � o ° p m ^ � jF_.-t n m `� N o v v � m `?.m o �-o ' ° ° � m � n . � ¢ n m cc � cn s ° ? o "y, s � oo ? ''�..� a � n � o n � " �' s � `o - � c ,�,� ° � < -� v o u � � � v = ' _ m n N N ... _ " = � '° T ^ i `� n - � � o n - � N � a c o � " _ � m � c � �..- � .�. u °- -. �.� c. � c x � � .-. =� '_' �. n < O `^ O y d y G� n�'•, J` � C '^ N O � �- � a > > tD O — < "� m 3 d 3 :-e�',{L� 4 � f O t� tC � � L � o. =' ._: n < � :0 5. 0 3 m N 2 p c -"—��'�' - n r� n < c a m m � ❑ o -,.c C o -r m n � o � o c _- � a _z �, ^ ^ ..� 3 _ < ... 3 .� n � ' o a -_ �a 3 =- c � -�=� N'I^ m _. . m N o' .`�„ n G m °O � =�, :� � _� -� N �:�: � _�� o :� � .� ��� =�- �_; l�� �v� � S�; � .`C: w . 9 0 =.mm - � � � :�.`: n � -�� o ��, n a '7`. '•►'_ .��' �s N ^. � n` � � � ^ g a = � . . � ;, o = _ ;�_ � s � � � � ,f, � ; � � 3 m� 3 3 3 � r`� �. a°' �' o o F .3� O n m o o � i O p ^ m _�H W N � O � y � � J � �ft+ n o T �- a N y n � - ��'� . o = c Q �- � <. j ��.: s � � s - y p ��� m ^' s a� � � � N ie' � o n - 3 m n_ c � � s .�. m � � � `_' $ � � m :�� ' f " y� s v ° � u ° > < � � �1. = ^ °— .�= .� ° a u N ° � ,G^,u-o =' G y^�o o _ _ o "-' m m � �,�y; i? n � � ° c+ < N �' < _' I� ��„ � �^ � w a a m o+ �" s y^ � � d o j N �? a aa o y '-' A � � n o 0 3 0 �+ G v a 2 �. o � _ � y o - o v .-: ac � '�° c � o � .�', n = N o � °° � ?� ^: ' � y o .'(fl'� ' w � .�-, _ � < n r+ ^. � o �- n' ° � � j �3a ^ a < - n =' � _ � -- o_ z a �. �+ � (o io � m � '� � a -c n a O � Q..�. o_ 7 c Q < j. N n ^ O n C � n � ' � m v n c v o v N =c -� o "^�. ¢ '" �; ° n � � a = � a < � o a'� � n m ° n 3� m io m " � w o 0 0 � <' o �� n £. � .�. .e.?� ^ � w � � a ° = cri � m c + � o o � �„ � N > > ^ � '° - _ � < y �'-�' F n v o a `° m � n �° '_° � � �o s ^p _ ^_. y n � � � ? ._� m ... 3 m 3 Q< w � ..�-.�- n °-� o' `5�..`. � � o -^' 3 � � f. n _ n _^. � ;=� ' � ° ",-'c � m - ^ � � ° - m u < _: � :o ..�t.r, O fJ < � . < Q ^J (J � ^ ���T> � S � � G S i '� � 5�' 3 � o io vo O1 � " _`:�t f. 5 � J `° � ' "' f n " <' .-. s = °- � - J ^ "' o � v � � '�,'�-g c N � � o - s v rn ' ''�5 in w �. p m a '•'D: c ry � ry •jy 6 '-' 3 � roY: � O � O f. J f. � �' • O T N � �7.�r u D p O . v O � S A .'3�'� 9+ A O � � O�a n Ll p :'Ec O � � � 4L = �^ � _eZ�: �i m p � _ n N 'W:=F 3 = F__ c -� _' i�c Olc m ',e'!: s - �� � �� � ` _ :n= m m Q � �i y '�3 O w a .�� �+ o " N .�:. °a '3§ 'r-� ��3 9 yz� O m ��`r W � u N �H v � � - � n �. < ? � � _ � -. u _ .� f' v m C 4=.�.. = - n m r, d � n cv -�j15 - N � � = _ = � 3 n „ ��-. ^� - 0 £ n � - -1 p(Dr � � � `� C l: .d. � ^ � rJ� r'J� �� m ' _ - vc o n a � � �(�r ^ r -�r - > > 'o c r o Z_ ?� a J - _ _ v o N c m �i � �. ? b � ti o �n - � a °' F��, J � - .9 - < ' u S - V O O � 7 � O 'J N � J G = n 7 ��.a I_. -� = ,,J1 _ _ " n (�a L _ G 'L .7 :' U � C � n _ � �v < n' m N S [= `-' G m co =; m p � S ' - - _ o ° 2 N v c `_ � c c � ' < = ' D"' � .° J _ o , ^ c - = - ., m v � w � _ n - � � r n o m ' m = < m m a ��'�{-' _ f a=� _ _ _ n n u o c � � n � J _ c o (p": � _ � _ � ° < ,= � - '^ _ . _ N _ v: a ,Q_ ° ^. � - " = n n r-' �- � '- �n v. o ^ � o a m c � ^ � c < O �% � y - n � � _ ^ y � C - � 6 /��L �G � N � m � N F n f J - N � �j r+ y y �V� a 3"=' ¢ - ^ m r. ' v � = C n p ° �r�.' � � n 3? c r, _ ' ^ � = u o �' _ � � } - � � r!? _ ' - ,�^ _ � . c c a n - � �+ _ = o an _ �J � ^ � � �' N � W � � = _O C C - � ���_-'-_ 0 , o y O r� � C C J 3 es � � � �, � _ - � � _ _ � �-� � n � F °- °- c '-� � n 4 s r. � _ _� N � .. T i: '� � n " m C ^ ,�J.-, '�e_ y _ '_" � o � n .=. o I= �`- ,�- � n. N � ',��'. w = r tl� f . o � n ^ � C � � ' � =io C O ' _ � ' N _ _ � = � o � � n ' _ = C ^ � __' ' _ �' z - = � r., n _ - — n2 . -�-. � �� - '< n u = �, n` ' ❑ =' p = _ � - - < m �� c _ _ m < c - - c � S :. oo _ _. n ' ? o O1�c: ? - � n` ? � � y � ; � � :.w . "'�' � - - :� w z� �, - � � � - - d � 0 � = w � � y N ] ^ e^^-' n o � .,S 3 -- � �.. =H .�z t07: ^+ fGl7 x N ;S"`' ; �G= w . _ n= m 9 0 .o� - 9 �3u a :�� � a _ ° ��- i .3 e-Fn i � c �- n � a V1�. n F �o O � m °1 C C �- = m ^• „ v; _ _ �. �J � G � C � (S R � �p � 1 7 (0 � `�j � I� - S O. �i c � � � o � � o � � <' = Z -' - w° � . s� .- c - �, -. ; � - r ^- - = _ c = _ _ ' � Q e s N � � ° � r° n " y c °•1 ^ n " + n � ' i _ _ = 3 0. /� � y '` 11 s � CS � ` - G 0 OGp - C r - = c o (�c� � a J � O_ n - � fJ -• C "• - G x n ? r (+, p �1 C � � � N n - n ^ ... l- ' r. . J � r� = G - n � O n _ _ r - _ D :�Y l ^ OC . i J N � V N � _ _ Z T�.. C V O (J .. n � ^� G (D V; f r1 f _ = O :��. C � � � � � � ^ � =J C '^ y rf-' � _ � _ N �' v ry � � � o � n C [o S. � � G = _ F 'I. n � �i = � ° n n � G y n - - _ ` v+ c 3 N o o = � � _ _ _ " = '_. u N y . — < ^ ;� " o° " :. � � �� .— :; - ' — ,3° � N � _' � :l rr � � lJ C ('� '- . ' _ b (l _' N b ' O m m C m C u i _ _ � y O � m n. a 5 � o a ' - .. o � c c �. '' = Q ° ;Dn � m =:< Y 3 . o co � � fD =. _ -^, � ' � a .�� �' m � ro �. v 3 - = c °- x n - n = ° o ��zi = n n � ? y T (,^ - � r = � _ � A 3_ u ° ° J � 'n n -, � - - ° � � ' ° ` "Q'", � C p .- _ u C � ^ r, n _ _ o . 3 ' � " = r. �' �m m � ' n � a � m C J � _ n `. N a i" � � G i - _ G � �" ti c � _ �� � < � = � _ m � c v+ l T_ � ^ ? 1 ' x :3� G G ^ w � _' � � - - v I't 3 C �: ^J C ^ N (i Z G _ � � _ � N N ^ � � C o � G � � o J � ao ' � � ' � = '^ ; � � �; ' „ � - � N T-�� c y o n c � c °; '� _ � " = � � r � ';.- ' � N n Oo j O = W � f � r�-.' � � " I v � ^ W JO � I� � C fJ C ' d _ - N ., c c y _' n 'c m " i: � L v, ... n n � _ _ . > > - n F c = c m J c n � � ' c _ < l�'J G y (� < � N � .. n _ � � . ,L 1 (� '_�', �. .J C � � fi �� �I �. (l � ^ O � � . � � � i� _ c = a 3 � L �c, '^. < r. =. s v =' � = c c 3 = ° = > = - - _ � " s � C I- = � < _ - - _ �; n io � T$ -•r' t+ `+ ip �° o � v� a a � a w � p� S N �-.�✓� � _ = y y � A � D „ < O ^ � G1 -,+f: O Q !'=' 3 f = O N � N = P+ V R ^ � � ^ _�. J � Q �i O d r' � 9v3 �- n � � o N .r': = 3 " 0 3 in �`} � ? � j__ _ ' ;; < .� -m. `_: �i, m �y.: : S � � ' 'C-' o w c = n� m Q: m �^.� m 9 o i 3 � �•w v d p �}' N �'�. a 7:. �� D s v D '(p�_ a m a m rv� Gl � 10 �c n � n V1 r, � � n n � °- m n ° 'o '° ° I� �. 3 o m a o n ' l ^'. =' t n n .,-�s. o o F (t � f p � o d X � d o a �'S': .^�� �' u � m ° 3 0 � n.J� s Ma `� j � ^ � = c � n; m (, n _ ... � o E _ c � � s _ `` 3 a O "_ m o y < n � c� � cD ^ n' C y � 7 � a > > o " � n �u < o - `° a " N � m �t � m o � .. � c - m - S o p c o .�: F ^, n J O^ � _ .,�n ` � m m 1 `i N N � � j ��.:.�� ' . - '9� 'J C.�i J ,�� p� " � v'i N � _ (D I^ ? F O N � < � � � p .=i C r � J � S � O N ^ < J S ^ C i � � y � _. _ m � N N 1 = ^ o u n m r. ^: n �.. � � c - � ... � .- s w _ °- _ � A cm ��J CN _. C m � - n S � 'p' r � _. ,"-�.,, m - l " -I lA (D `v V �. W O y = N , d O Y O Y (D .SSI�. � o � �, o ° a 3 �, ° „ - ' � a 'o. 3 = „ ,3' a c� �; � c s ' � c - � .c =� '? ° . � � = � n .° 3 �D� N °o -� � � _ > � g c = _. � H a y Q = '� � �e i c = 3 oi .. a � � £ =. �� _ c � �5 �s � � o ti a .3:3 v� � 3 � .. (ns y o m F < C � � p .f�''t = n � ? o _ a £ - - n � �n " 7' � � c �' o F � m � _ Im � _ A - _' o y a =-,. 2 N C ~ x n � � ? m Im � v+ m a? - v+ � j r. � m � . a o a �. o _ a o l L1 ^- 9' s ,�� n o f � o Q � ^ � j s _. v ` � o - � s °Q oo ?. a .� N < n 3 ro o< c � s � d j m m � 7 y '�? ry Y < N � J 3 u 'V Ca � `2 � v � � �.�j 2 y .� � � �y m N Q � d O o � N C> ; N � R f1 G - � � �R.. u c: o ti m g n � o _ o ^ _ _ m c � m � s�ti m m � � � a _ - e n o � o � � c o < ._- . ^ " � o < y L � d ^ o a = - s _ J � = � m .�. j l �-�l p v�i G'� � o u = a m n n-�� x � o ._-. ^. c p �i. j O ,�in., C '^ - w _. m � m N = m r0 j = - 3:tu.. O �] ^ �. ' _ ; ' rv m . J .@? j v u � N F p n x n Q c m N v' ^ n X �<i+- O - ' , = -�. � � fl _' � Q � � (D � 9 N -p C � s`:_: �j 1/� Cl S � � S � (0 G .�. 1 ,j::y, n�--� 2 O ' � 9 D CJ l 7 C y-k G r � � � n � � p � � J � �.�-. , d > (0 � �i '_ y N y O (l C � � m Ll � i '�e � F p O N _. � < � n tp " 3� y_ .. - .., O1 - i c� � l cu u <� C " y T,rue' j G Jn _ 4f � m ti C O '_';' O ... N , < � C G ~ ' y .�'! W N = tA lA t':�:• N N �r • n '-�`t � � n c o a �i';: � o n � `=' -c m d �a_$ N > � � n ^ i�'� ° � Fi- � F r� �� 7+-R. �/� i' �w�r ti m ,K` x �} � •�' w V 'n � a o ;o=: - � � 3.; � o `�z a 3; -�� n n •�� a a `{/1'- n n ^- n a =,� n n n n A_ Q cp � � "� ° C� n N m o " = c � -- n cn > > v. � aOa � � � c � � : IH � F .�'-__ Iv. �. � � N .(D,'. �' n °. ^'yo � J w = - c • c o in+- } a `n o c �-p � = n � N w i �3�: m. � 2 n c d • ? v 3 n :fD�: < � m ,� m m o - '� p d w. � y � � � ' ° c � � u f c c N o ^ 3 _�7; � o'a s � " . „ v N �I� ^ � � � fn � c ' o � . � � ,. � � � m . m N 'a j � j t,� Q .G.-_. � -. � c � � C n n m `�; N �j (D ». .y-. j L � � � = L• G - C ^ y n � N ^ ,d� � fD (D O - m � n �° a � w 3 0 o c � � c � � � � '3-1s o ^ m .-: 3 4 f - � _ - o � � � J (D v O . , . ^� . � N o � mmin � a � n � � " 3s � � - '" I ie 'D'� N y .-. � p _ 3 N = c ^o � m � v `.�M O p� � Q j m O � C _ O ' < � - c p �(�C c � o � m � a w � _ ° c o = < y -3�� � p� � tn � •-q' cD 7 c = `^ n - n ^ � - N Q � c o �. m m m L " - - � n = _ � } . m � �lo o� � f � - _ _ ^ c c � " `�°-� � N `G y N � - _ - = G y ���,iy � (D �O � y - ^ �. � � - � O R "`-3a� _ m � o m � � - ^ c c o n � _ .'. .eM: = � m < o c o � a '_' < 3 N 'w � ..�-i o. _ �, - � = o - C N cp in r � - - ... n 'c =. `,.Y (D O d N N 411 � � � _ � F C � c�r � � O � ^ (D ` ti � ^ = m v "--.c N O Q (D SU O] O a� O C L C � s� fD � � O N O {y G J C .. � l J F -1 � C.: ui_ tJ li = `-' a � c - - d �-. n `,'i�„A. l' fD fD � � ° - �" - _ -_. y N � (/1 v ffl d v N O _ G =� N v '"�1 _. � = a � � J 41l y C � N n � - � c �n ^� T� !O �- a C � � � C ^ C _� � � �� s 3 m � n = - � c m c ,�.� o � ° c o = � ^ a = G '�_ p� '^ 'm � c � °' _ -�'" � ,. - :. _IC IN _ C N y c G �''.�` c ' v -�.'^.��y � � - �n a �=� tn v� o w w �` w r� 3 � D m .r J ''u 2___ N G ` �� � 7 3 :�� 00 - d j - J y� J?� C Q R � d y J �J� C 4 fi '+� J w �_ 1 W �/�_ �wV,u �Wm m 1rt3 X T H ✓.ri;' J `� w ,�, m m v o p O� � 9 .,�;. a �. � N �'< o_ 3`s` rr� o D n '.'fp;� � 6 2 {AF_ A � A � �T�: � N �i: „ � n; v � = n = o o '° `° � �J y � ° �Ri p � � x I� I� � n n n N n Co _ N O t 'B C n n C7�` � ° �: < � y � :� � � o �+ � � O� N C � O N � �'� � � n � .'-1. � J O fp � :J p m N (D CJ N » �.e � ,� O � _ C � p - < J G N . � i '3Y" C � � n _ O C - N 41 p O tn n p � y 41y O � N � � ^ n � �. ^ ^� C [D 41 O oa .} c' O O ' N ^ � '-�. C (D � y N N 7 � n' 3 �._ C ,_, G � � n ^ d V� °'. -� O �p � CJ p �� n q� � �� � � a �- � � w o � Q '� o � 3 (n = 4_' a o ��ry a o c � n _ 3 � � o O � 3 Z � a ,^- � �Di: < °-' _ " n _ n � m ' d � = 3 " .�. N G ^— = m a a � � =. m = �, u� a� p �, ] w ��v. � £' � - � � � � c = � � m � o 'fD" _. S < C O N C n N t� Q G7 < O. .�y.. O � � (U �< � . 1 fJ N � � N f/1 l� C� y ^':e w ° n 3 � � v c �D o 3 m �- < i� � l� '1 ,.-�. .�. j' ^ C (ll CJ �1 t� Q N - :�� _ � n tD O ; '� � G J ^ � y — p) (D � _. O y .(�� 0 3 s ? -' - ^ _ o m o m �i � � n 3�? (D � a � _ - � (D C J � T p �` !T_ � Q m 7 O J CO q Q y N ^ (] < V_M' ID :0 � -i ? � C q � . .� J C (D ��E n � G � C ^_'. O N =. (n J = y' d (D � ^ c � m � W m m, j � N i O � � �� N A p m � _, n n fp O y � � O _ ' � m � ❑ m fD N ~ � o � ,� ' ^ � = � p .-. � N � O r u '< ^ � � J ^ � ' 3 O � - O d y � N � � J n N ^ � = N ^ � � �,.,: � (0 N � s y [D C O � CJ . �, '�.J � � l O - �, C � � � � O � _ � ? n � y N � � _ � � � _ � � _ � O 6l � � N � CJ x G_ J_ � � Sl^. v 'n O I(D tD �;_ C> � � _�; �� `�� �: '�� � =�. � - = o = _ - �: ''`^:1� y �- �� �r % 1�-{ � �S: � �_ w _ n: � , �_ � v ��A9 'o 3 a 7~, o a �:: n ,3_: K� Ni_ �� _� n. �= G D � � � < y O � 3 .� 9 n /—� -v �p _ m O Q n Ty O oc .Y I� n � m � � = =c Ji � � "�;' � , o .(� 3 M � < n ,'�- NOC � N mJ C .�Y O :� O C C O .,� � '- ma � ' m � _ ° r. y fDs � �'. o m _ v� < o ^ � n j��i g � o G � ... n ' � T� �n . n v m � � O � m D � 9 � 2 �� � � A l ^ {, G VC tJ C � �' J ' ^J 2 � SU.��P. 3 , � ?� H c -. m �. � N 2. c n -3� ti _ � � ". ^ n � 7 � �- n � �,s N < t�I 9 �� �r. � r = l� ]1 . �L � � 9 ��- m m G J 1 t � .� � � N 1 � O ~l � � n ,; � � 9 3,� � 2 N ^ � o n r _ � �_ � � � J V - Y i �; � _ } z Px A �=' r `d- � � O � ` — H �"' � rt� �. � � C � � y Z' n :3? y a � F. j � y S X I�'!e � __ ' � _ ,� . � ; � - N � z _� � r - � -"�' � ° � Q v � ^ f a � n � _._� �y* ' � = � = V . � . N . i� � iC Z T�,.v. �+ � N fJ ^ � tE 'y' � . '� T '_^ �+ ^, n N < �' � n y � � T � •'i:L'�d, � � _ � % � ^ ii _ ., � r - O n p �o ,n =.tr:Z. .� � � J = � ^ � �'1 � y �TM1 `v'� � S �C N �-' �? v�i n N � F � �"�S.': 'P !i� �+ m V O1 �W � _ ' � D �'? D 3. m In .i.�-_'-`. u d °�5. J �4: h T£ � N �- � n 'r-� o+ o � > > �n _' C cc � _' I �' _a- z:+_a^ i�h x '�-5 N 'S' ? �7 w �� m m j p O~ v .�^. Q ti � O =i: a '3�' _�� o � <a a �.- 3 � m ^. a if/1' � o n < N a i�. � n T 6� O> 3 o w =� (J N /� < O G d U l�l' � rv w vi . D N L /� j � � y � � � O � p�j d � �^ � N '� •y I. � '. N (D � fi: x n -"' -`° _ �, o � � �- 7 7!a � w . "y � w 1° y � � j v °_'.� v ;, d N � �' ��� n d - m � m � oo � c = � m � '�; .^s. n' � ^ ry1 � a � y �' • <; � �7 S ��-i3 c f � o Y'. c m �� m c`„ n +{co �F < N N ". � R a � O Q A �v v rc „ ' '�•r o �' n � o S ^:� � - g Y � � `3> � mam, �, m .a v � Q � w ^ m' `� ; �D?, o, (� � y �' c 3 � <° = a � i � A m �- � � _ � � m y n o T. m '•°• `��i J N Q (D � y n � m 4 � .�-1 1 (n � m SU f� O s Q � S 3:n � J � N � �?. � S Q � _ y`� m (Z`' N C � N � � j m � �= a" � r21 n ,��;. fD fJ C' � y J J � o � � 1 a �L5 a `n c� �, N •�' �o- o< �i p � x -rta � N � � J O Q Q Z rt� * .. � p � n � O � •� y � �'4-. ? � Q J < e � � .. O � i { � ' _ �.-f; � O O N � � � _,��. 01 � � a "' � � < s � `� N � � a `° �' � ` � �'�� N 3 SU (D C J S � m N ...a. W N N O 3 7 -' ,m, '�.. N�G N � � �' P Q y � J � � F p �n �W . �% L�l � .� ^. p Q � �-;Je j C fD O N m tD � N � � 'I � _',`� n � � � � m v � �D -- . S y 2 = N 0 O � ? �y< 'P t T tY1 �V '���;� � �D : � � .- o " !�.. S a N � � � � o � N O1 . 4) � � G yY� � t�: �, _CTL-: N x' A n �� O ';� � - =.E � �_� � �... :�� ^� e�h_� Y N `S ; `G- W . _ <n� � , ;o� v ��; a ��� N O �,^- o. ;3= �if'. z (D� m < �v�� � �� c /=�i � lTl- v O N � �? :� � v x - : f, m m 0 N � � ^-. > i^r � � ^ o � N ro � - �n n ^ < Yl3 ,.3� o_ ^, m ^ j � c N � A � C , � � . :..� � ,�� :D - � < r m N �= � s O � m q � O < ' C � �'. y y ^ . 3 N j � � ^ N � J N n v ,'1p y G a _ � ��s C � � m m j p— r C Q O � C .f � � � 'L 7 v j � C p :R�. c �, O V' ° _ c - " fD N -o � o £ � � a � ' .°'- m _ 07"' io .-. - c - v� = i� s n o r ("�., " � y n o u = ' ''°' 3 = �' m � � ? ° '^ �a �' > = l� < n c - � ; c "'�° 3 � m _ - 1 � c � a Q 7 = � y v aa � m n x o r� � N �< = � c F a a - = � N fl7 � � n. H � ^. c � .`= F -- � < � = s ¢ o '� � �n� � �7�. :i - c m " c � n =. 4- `^ e � w `° — - o o = ^ � c '°. m = � , � � o ' � (D ' C Il y � � � � y � CC � � C f: �� '.11 % � f J ��s �.�n CI. _ �. O = G = ^. � a_ n S C � � C (J _ N. Y r-y� 9 �� co _ � � .. 11 C C 1ll C i fD � x -. O tD O n .. tD � �n n _. 9 � O �� � N r --. = n C _ 1 N ro '" f, c G � y ' _ ? � § n m _, rD � � � ^ �'� c N o � o � , n `f � p =y a _j p 3' . � = y _' � W :. '^ O �n i O (D Q c, � " < � n < � ^ � < = m c - `� ^ o " < y � v � _ �? � _, v m � � 2. n � t � n ai a m � '�.. � � C O n C - = � l' n n m ° � m � K C � � � d �s _ � G � N J � G � G � � ^J � ' � N O J � ~ � � � " y5- o � � = � N x m N ? � m � n ro c � y � x •rr' . vi ' ^ i . C.� � � J = tD v v � m ' o m ' _ � - �° F £ < �� o � : m � � n " m � _ ^ � � (� (� = � N !J f. - � J � N � ' y -e � � 1 n N Q N tD S1 � F N � � O J C C N � O N � ,J. d j � G � O =f:. o m = °_ � c ' _ � �^ �' c r� n c � 3 � `�' _ -_ " 3 " o — = = ioc — s � � = —o < _ � �, ymc� y =_ N � = - » � io m _ n �++ - - - � n N :D � ,.. � _'< = n i� fl v� � O � n v n -' N p �.�-. � ry+ J j O n � O_'< T i � �' A y� � � � � �`^g_ 0 o f = c _ ^ _' n - � = m C !� x -� = f1 = �p =`c Y � fE O � < �n < .. = � � J n D y ' - � CJ :'1 .� • 1 7 � G �` £ ti �n _ = C N � V ry J tD -i '^ N� � J n ;J N � .�. O n v C � C =, G� ^ � - ., � < m _ � - nc �p � - ` n m G _. v a+ S 1 9 c � m o .'�-� o '� _ n - � c c y, z = N � _ y ' .0 �'^ .� i OC (D G Y f'� N < -. ;}��IG . �� � ::� � _ J £ N � C �'t Q S -Ya j 3� .. O ?- w „' � � -�'� d ^ r� 7 a o � �� o r� 3 3�. ,y� r=� r=o �z ��� m �T x u ��s 3 '�,'-' � _ ,n� m C p ,O- 9 .�3._. a 3` �' � '� a n ;3�' K; C 'm a ° � a (D� y � a � L n :H' ^+ n p_ a v �; a f � n o :=t < d n < '�?_ < ^ � _ T/_�„.? � ^, O C A < � � � O t d �n �i y 7 Y 1_ ' � _ m r> _' 3 .•. 3 t^ m o ^ v' r� a � = �°—� _ � f °� °o � ' < <^ � — � O �D' ^ � C � _ � c < w - w n ° �. � $, o o _ � = '33 � m n � n o = n F � c l < - � � ^ �t _ � � - � ^ °- o G � m � n w m 5 - ip 'Z� � a � = = n � F^ = � � o n 'm _ s n " � O7z cc � - - ' � � �_ � = c c ca �. c G c 5_ � � u < � � " ��: c n � o oa m ° � .- �D � n n � 01 � < ;f � � 3 n = N 3 m - � ^ o '.� . x a 3 � N o '-^� < v� .. ' d � a .O1- r _ o' u w „ � _ 3' � ° n v� n w � ; m' ' o � °i a � � ? - m a '¢ � c u N N - � n ' �p < � u 'o y v: � c a a A 3 Q c � n � ^. n " ' � � o "=.� ° ° ' 9 `f3D� ,� : n -., � � 0O o o = - o d, c _ o 3 X ` n O � 3 � G y � ` � � � O b N 3 c c N � m' < c z c � � a f� n � c < Q3'� Yo i� ^ = a ' F =_' � `_' _ r'� -, '^ c a = :3� ^. N � ' � = c r, - n a � � o v n N n j� � � J i rdi ,` < J C O � C C G O W 1 S�3 ,., r� _ � N o o � � ? � � '° � = ° ' _ ' :e3.Ys .'^- n _ ^a° � ... u m � o a = .�=s�=. � � m < o � m ° u � '° ° 'o o, n t�^ n - *.�-,a� _ ^ _' n ? n � � a. � m � � � � (: � � w n y = o a u � s � � � _ � ° m S � ' n = v - - 3 _ o � � �. = � �n ° ^ � � � ' -"?-�" _ A o :o � � o c o a - -. � l : n c c = < '^ ^. o - � N ^y n a ' '��_j- ' ', o v n n o o � � � c 3 � � � rt c =,_'�.�.�' rr-.�- =� y � w oo � � �0. � - N : � ' N C Y d a � i� .^ i ° m c T3 = 2D < d �F. n � r, y o � s y ,�, o -•y'-n N 1 �n A '^ O � - O � .�-. O '� -i ��" G i� J� � j � G C J � n d n O c • �ia� a1 C C !^ CJ F J - _. < - _ < m n lu � C �n � � �n n . _._ N Y+ = O tD �� a � i.i "_"i" 3 � � �: � n � Pe � r m = io _� 3 - < - m Z � = � � w ^ w a �ti.. J � °° � a in ' 3 o m � _ � n '� � o y o � �- o � o . C a n '- � � � w ,i-T. H F (o y '�'.�-°,r y c '_ ` rv °—�. =4 ��_ =,flj' m �' "- S T �r m m y o Q3� y 3` a° =�' > o ��� n .3s a ;rl� o a C C '�" = 6 ti ti �/1 < W W ��: W N I C �': ti 6 A ;ny a a n �e n v S-o c c � m a 'm -. '< a o o i� �' N n o �nt i Ol O n O � y G1 n � S � 1 c' c � `^' m D � c�i _ �.< � Nym ° nTc iNa ^ � occo < � 3` n - � .- ' m � � m c'c o � � � ^ � ��r � m � y m ` = w � ��', < n n p' , J n 'Z�'. � .. m � m - u n � � m F. ° _ � o �5 J v � � a F � � M _ N N � � . � m x N - � • -. o �_ = � � o r=^i - � N v� y o � '° n G � v n : � � c_ v � < a c y N n � - v c = = � n° j4j`. ,, G ii - N � F� c o � �D � '^ l° a O -+ w - � � � a � �3y � n N G �� � � � O o '�^ N W c n n 4a n � � � < : , o � Dy r� y n H � � " � c � �- ' � n � _ N �° � n x N r, � � v' y J m = c � L _ c � a .�/�s � Ol �p � � X � f�Y lD Y T Q. N G ^ fD F+ C �`V'4 y - C 'f1 � d N N � � � _ Q1 ��R lD - A _ �. O N tJ O' N '^ � � 1 N S tD �Qt ^ fJ � y '!� C '� C �y O l'QJ l �; � (1 C � l S m O 'G m N tE .'�. Q C C J ? n �i. fl � lp � v�i tD �. a .� � _ N � C O \ � ,(flN T �G � Cl G I < C 'L (0 `G W ^ T] (0 � Y ��`. � _ _,p0 L (C � u O A o v. . p IY: « _ ,� o - ': m � c n �. � m � v � v N � y - n '�n = -�'`u' � � ^ n Q � N = c ` o °' '� C_�i J p i C tD N O .� N � tD ^ +�o' � ^ L - y O � � tD � N � (E j O- V p � r�"c S � O J 1}�' 0 �' C � u. o m _ � :'{li: CO � .y-. J � n ^ J V' t� ei � N v ...1. v < � x � J n' � n O < O J l0 :ii' ^ � � J O � �- F z ° _' m � d a o � � � � -r.�``:�'I c N 7 ' n < � a � w W L. O =� m ^ p T � < Q p J'(D u . C ^ m ' "F CO fJ � C � fG 1 O C .�. IG -_� N J O -' � 1� �- c w = -`_3 N ��: V �xt-� m `��--t^[;. _ �`� � �-� w n - O N � 3 �' '�-T R - ° o .s�: o � ' < 3 = u _.�s w m ti� ,=T :(D .d- m '� x �S� w' z'h�'� _ :�" � � a _o. ' o :�_ a _�;� � o ;�� n ' �I n '3; •�e` o D S o v A �- < a w o o rv n ¢ s = _ < '41: _ � �s < < � ^ � � � � ;�� w m � � „ � , w fA� _ �, �. D � v. � � c � � o s �' � o ^ - o � � • � a � = o � m ^ n y " J o � N ` O i _ N n _ � i i�� � � n io � ^ � (n, m -� o g a f. c � .��; c: r_ n n - - � o '^ v� < fD 3 ' i m J � n �3_" � � °„ � ° 5� � o cc ° ^ c u � a m � ' _ _ m - fD:= n c Pa v+ C v, d C N � S S O _ :a m r'- ? ^ . .�� _ J N f^. = O' H � D n C 'J < � � J .. � {i ��^ � h !J � (� � ^ N j ,.'Aj � � = C, C � = C 3T.t - < � � � °- n c � � < m v = 3 °- m ."�s � o „' c i y J � � t� � � S A � z m � n 'a1� ` ' ° � m o = _ £ = v � = � = � '- u `m `3= ^ � - ^ o ^-.co O � C n � '. � � n . =' n � o � � � °1 o ic N � n a � _ f° ia ^ c � ,# � 'D=: � . v _ � s f � � � � � s " � " =3� . � 3 � � . o _ p � ° � o m o � c ^ a o n = N oa � � :a v � fD= � n N � � � � � _ o m b < a a = ' o . ^ n� o `r'" y n � r�.� ° £ c "' n r� � � _ = E a s�� ' ' _ ^ d m � � c w N ^ y �y N � n � � � n - � i � m � sr , � n ^ � C ; � „ p 7 n o = m H w � = c m � -. n o m p � -., :. aa 3 a c n P. `� _ =' c � � ' on =' � n n � = � � _ c y ':fDY a =� a �^. m ? o - � co � � a d o x r3= : � �n = � vmn � < m � - d - _ 'o ° rtw o ' n � � � v .^ � e� n m o N < '� ' ` v -''-s� .. � o r. m v n o � - - N c =� !° c_`-' �- - - c � c F r� 5' T � y � -_+ :°. c '��-x � c 3 ^ c r� _ � ' o ° c � . n -„� n o � c ip v' - v _ s _ _ C '"_ 7 C � n n m � �` - - � �'iK J a ,n � N ,�n � ci m n i� J _ < � c — c' m m m o_ - � � v ._ m _ l , % '� _. ;. _ � » _ n � _ o f _ o � _ . _ .� c c = o � =a ° ^ -- � � m S -�Y ^ C n - v y a " p o o � n ° `D m n .:- n � = ��o �? „ 3 m ° < < - n = F � � _ � � � ^ ^ � � . y �_ N � in N Q N � � y �0. R �. � � � �. N a I;� �. � � _�= . —N _� 1J �.�`�{ � V W _�� 7 m y �`--`�-- ° � c� d a ' ° c ``t'i J � � �� A � d � 7 � ¢ 7 T�S a �� � F=� � �� O � O �i� 3 ��''^--., '�� m ;rt.: '-` .S: � `�= w - = �AS � � o .�_ ° — � '•��s o ��� a � � :�_ � a ;�?: ��< � n n � C a ��` �+ a < � � � N> 'i�' ? x �O d .iWn a �� o N � c � T.` ^ o � v � A' � ? � = � o • s � _ o� c 3 3 0 � � ro =� �(� � °-� ,�» � i�.� c ` N w" '�^ 4 o a � m ° '� � �(D= 1 � c - � x ° = � < ° - c c c °o' v = � � �, � � z � o°r° ',7� � ., � - < � F ti o T� E n ^ < cv °n° n – _. � � _' c � s � :.z= � ^ m p =,� � G C S m�_ n m < � n o _ y, u � _.9 . F n j ;v r� J a C C 3 � � � � p �� m o n ,�„ ' � = N � v � = j rc ^- � � s � 3 u 2 ° - � � � � � c o p u" o � n ��� 0 0 -� v = m � v �+ :o � _. , � ^ � �' m° .'7= � O 'o '� � .. � C � .�„i�i = � C `+ _ J f'l -. n p �-�f' ^ ' £. A I` ' v � = � c n a'NO '� � n < � 3 � :�: c 3 w ? `-' k = m y � � o �, y � ^ m � o � a 7�, � n o �� v c o � n � � � ? � _ < �, ci v ^ d � � _ n . J 2 '� .+ tJ � Q '�=' _ � G �' 1 C ,v oDi , y � J� n L ? _ 7 9 e�� O _ � " �' a ro � o c � � n r' � w a � � � c '° T _ '�- m o � � ic < m v a i ,v^., N m .-�. � = : � °- .fD� < <^ – � c n r, '- u � ti j' 3 u�i � �'J � ^ N i !� n 'Y (J J Il J r � Y �'�'S C � a� c _ �i � � 3 a (° � "� ---' � : � � m � n f a - � n F = � -' n �� ro a� m a " _ ^ o o m $ ° . � iu F = � �. � _ _ o y v m � � � _ � w � n o � < =4.� o � y '+' ° ^ � c � � C � n m �^" '�.', (; ? _=:�' Q = 2 n ^ p �; � y. � � n w' 3 �a co .: b _ p v� � O^ � fj O _'P'!, ^ " v C. f - C u m � � .^�� =' n ° �'e.'g � T a J O :J N ^ � T 1D O (0 J j fD UO C F y .� � C � � O_ � i� J C O_ C O C � _ � �{ �p F C: � �% '� - S Q T J < �n n _ � _: r° ^ ' {i � _ 3c- -.=1 s� �� ]�-_ �'_ _�_ 'M1'e� .C''-• 1I� �i^i 1'� �±�. � l' .3 J ANiG .� .�-� 2c cD� .d� : +�*-� � 'Z_ � �: w n3 = � o .O;_ 9 ��3� a ?= � o '�`� i9 6z n �s C � 2 C a � � ^ - `�' F _ = a' r^ ,�-�1- a ti a � y ? � _ � � � N_ (�i C� l4 Ot N �. � ^J � J .. � /�d C� N Ga 'I' ft : V l0 .,�j�' (� '.11 � O f� p W i' � N C �G. (J Q _ = � w (�� ^ ti C � J C ,- ��►_ � ,j}� � Cl ^ � � o � n � 2. v1 �° y � � p w ,y'• � a � s 9 C �' O - .^_� � C y G �c !J £ �. F � � . � � °' � f f�t ^ 6 � �� < = o c- � .. -. _ .fD':u _ o � O r°�. y m ro o � � � ��x o r N - o � ' tJ n n tb ;, ., w � ;�� in ' < _ _ C Y N !D !p � �1 � � � — lD O fL-� _ _ d f 9 �' vV�i < �J, J ^ n' ;�� � y v . (D �^ N 1 � ^ O S l� O ^ ^ D 2 _ O C � v n p ISUs _ m m - o ^ °c r, m � � =+ '° � n o F n '�� N O1 m n ^. � _ �c° � c � c � '"� � d � � _ ^ � � N ,� D= - c �n � m aF � c ' � � m � a �3 s J N a G � .+ 11 � (C y G G O ,(�g _ y VT' C � n' ` -�- — _ _ � �i . � O -' G :� 7 N t A ' _ c .�? � „ N s N ' :'n � - H � c � n � = ' =: ry .. � o c �n o u o 1. � < r � m ,m o' a s � _ - n i � � _ m � v n J (p°�' -. • _ � �y�. _ = c � '^. �m � n -3 _ _ _' v ^ ; (C � � � c .. � � r. i " 'T� '-'' �.''- _ ^ v '�^ � y � � � a er=: � � = ° ` r " ° , � � � v = �P� _ _ � - y N - n = - - < < � - o — ' = � = ; — u c � n _� < v m < ti � ^ m G .- ;�'C� p .� !J � < � !D � ^. G j - - ._ � c - (P -. y '^ O � = c+ e-��',y _ = o � L '��' - C � n tJ n ' - � `�' C. ^ ^ C � N . . _ _ _ _ n "' .:'�'i ' � � - � � � � c C n, � o � � . � < � - ° � 9 _ - . s C v = r. _'"t F � < � _ . ? � = c �.`�� � < � r_ v � �_ G �-' n ? ^ p o � ." m � - r c n y ^ s-��' ' _ � � m � _ f, _. � " ^. ._�� � F ' i `� ' �' c = m � ° c � _ _ _ � �.� _� _w _� ��' J V � F� l0 _-���_� F� � W J � 3 �> n O a �'� < d c ° _ m �, - < ' � < � � � �o- ° � �n ' � Q s n d � � o ;� � - ' N 'n_ {!� �'c`. �I ^�� Y W A 'L O �D �'�'_f1 D °i '-� ❑ o `r�r m o - ?. T � � o N ,-�. � o � ��G o ^ --�' m o `•ac 3 � �. < N J �.,.�'}3- G ".�� � __ N 'iti?_ _ �: < i�f m '�� � ��/ _ � `1 OC �"tf = O c 9 0 � � 9 �` b � �� vi ��_ a 3;r ,eMs 3 r A ;� � 0 J � ti ti i� ti < (/I=, 0 N N N N � �� � ll W � W d c iu i.. O '_$ w w 1 I � 'A, � n v' w = c Z c r _ o g r.. o -� -. � ;�/.�>` N � r f. F =j J � O N � G :y�/� a CQ_ _ � � G �i � � � % � _ v�.' ',�Ds _ - c v 5 c _ � =. � y G (. .'3-, . � _ 'f `_= � o - J ^ m � � - �,�'„ � c ;(D° -_ z � N c7 < o _ � n � _ � =�y. _ � '= - � o = n � ^ - - v. �47° . r�' i � '^ � 6 _ m N c . . f - S m C N C � � Q � O �l�' � 2 = � 7 � y Q � � in 1 � U 3 C • J � C. .SUI_ = � � S — � � � J B = v�i �1 �3'� . � p u � n � � o D3 = � _ o � n � N — c f _ � - _ = N .. � � �' _ - = o — � - o � � :o ir � v �� = o= � F c " F � � � p �7� s � _ n . � 1 r. � .- O x � iD fJ q n � ,�" ^ = Ip° J � .�i - _ j J v+ < A G ,¢� _ � n � o W < v c = c �� �E _ . o c s � ' y .��� y O1 f :. y N G (� ^ :"�S c � � y F � � o n ^ LL� C ^ 9 y � J " � � a a .-. a v � c +` °a _ <' a � < m � _ = n s';`-�,rr Y _ n m � Ip " n - %�� = (D �n � �^ < G — X C � 7 '_L_ N C .`- i - � y � c ? o _ � c y o � m < 2 _ ' ,'.`t_ = _ N _ A N N = �: d � O w S i C ."- S ry � y'{�, ^ �i � = O .'. � O � �� '} O � __ . ' -� a � � N � L _ C '�� f. � �c .: f. 3 (� C�i < � � J �.'t -f � W t� � ^ O C � m .�. C _ < � I � zv - - 4 � l "^_f' � f � � Y ^ tc0 R 9 :n � ^ 5i_� Ir:' n � C � � m I� � 9 � �c � N Q1 V � v� O d J J — J � ��y� T O N ��T� N � � n � O ° ` ('1 = '� O - - 3 ' 3 :r� c � a'� � i� +p7c Y f 3r ? ✓c �n. W : =n� m p p �04; t �� N � ��`Y. a 0 0 � �r a 3. �� � �*+ o < o � �p=; � � � �H_. � J � N, ^ J ��- _ F D y¢; a+ � � b u ¢ O p_ ^a m:� < o F � < � ob s r' °-_ '-�' o'Ic ^. n � r�o n �=a T o o ¢ <' r3, n � ? � ° c'o � °- ° t +� < � r�'o c !^ o .�. r: � v, � n€ �' o : 3 ^ a � 3 � `� i ' � 3 0 � m � �c vn, � � N < � rC _7 � C T c � '^ � V` 0 ^ i y Q O d J rJ N � !�s � ° as = nNn = � �. T '� � � oa � � � ��� -�. r� (a co n � S � i o+ ` � V. - a � O C Cj C G .�_-y u ^� ''-_'. l j �' o s o, a ' a m " _. m d _ " .�_' � 3 °� � � — n � — 3 a m ? = � r;� .�-� J ^ � � � � � r� � n � `� � � N ? � O u :� � r� : �� � o '� — a c � S n 2 ? o - '^ � = o� :, F „ = m � < c �� < - � � x � 3 f c =. � Q � d c; o ° � y > > c " � < ° �_� ,, a � n � _ c c � io � F - � 9 � u z o ^ ^ � o � m u d;= � > >< ' � y � � o " N y ,� ' � n '3K. < N ^ N _ N ' r � v � o ` a � < � - "` a - ' ' `- " ° = � ; � f - � � o � ° = � � � _ ;D=. ° ° � ° � � a � - � ` _ � _ � < � � �; ? N ..: s x � I= � o � � � io = �, n o— n y � a -� ^ _ ^ `-° o m m. n _ � N � ^ j c °_� � = � n a 'fDr _ � ia < n - `=.T � i� N ^ N � '9 G H C � G e�� p m n r, v v d :' n ry � v+ + j - ,-: vr�.i � - A N ^ � c • o w = c � � u < < o r: c n Q u a o � s ' a � �' � � � m F �D = (° m �• F 4' - n v�A. C c � S '_'�"- u ,�T T � c _ .. v .. t� �p l�.'v1 q .. j � O _ - i Y R n �, — H � c _ _ a . - ' N " _' c = � a�y n � 4 ' �' f � < " ��" � N " !^ - v^� ^ °— < i� � r` '^ � " ° � A ro m : 3:;: o u y , Q � N ^ � S N � � °O m x- � O � .- ��. = t�y _ � � n N � ?� m l� 2 D G T k2�-+� o � s � a m � o 3 c n � Q � (p .,n < o �L^: n u n — F o � � � o-a n " � o' � q � n � _?i�� G Gn O ^ � < C � � � � � O a ^�yi ^ N = -�-1 O � < � < fJ � n Q rp L. G v�. � O � - C� x N � � J � J � � R � y 1 J �v�. � y ' � l .�. � O � � L ^� (: � C - -s'5..... �^ � ^ _ C n � (� ` N - j O � � t� �iJ O _ _ ' � � ^ - O � ^ t Y� C O1, u .:� u u n °i � y = ,�� � ~ =� Q � ?� u f^> - � ^. � - N p 7 �n _ !'I._ N C 3 �.�'� 5 O 1 = < '�j2 _ v (J N .��. O •• ry � l j u l � � � '_^_ �! - _ � '�' N `� = � � v Y' N C � N a (J _ N v� .2r? � Q o � c _...� N � � _ 'c o. ^ - °�' � �' u � � N p ^ o ^ C " v. � N 3 � � �.°, oa n ° � m 1 _ = , a:.f < ,.-:o r� = �� n �-� �z .� '�r N �I � � _S� o ^a, ' �� �n �qi :� .-c�y<t'Y' :Z� i�� :�:: m :d? Y �- _�1 W ✓��. . � _ .n° —yo .�: — � ;�;t O �F 9 r O �� R a 3; e-F; `�.e Na � � ^ a�� - _ v v m ^ m j a � �• u ti ^ _ ��. 3 p � n � � N u N o a J � � ^ =c o_ � � m ' ° < m 3 � n . o � � � G aa �.. � � �.. �' d s - n' =. o � v < „�, � o o � a � � a -.�. � n n sv-*:, � � o o ' � n � �, � �. s n o o '_ _ -' � � o � ^ � =' > > n < � a m m � o � � = - n u 3 � tt !'_. ° �? 3 _ m a p -'^ ^ � G1 n � ^ o m - < a n � �- � ro � o - - = m � '° !o � .� i c� o � � ��� F ] 7 1 � � . ^ N J O n C e� - O U � O . (i �T � ➢ ' � w `- .�.� c' m � 3 . u � ^ � � � � � d '�v - in `_' o � - � "'-' � 3 m o = _, o � � � m ° � ' °l O ' � : m .'_. 9 •-• ° '� co o � � % °i a r�e ' � ¢ ? m n � o ' � � a . c m o � � o m' o a o = 3 :i. � � � , � "„�, n '" m - � = o ='� � .. o �..�`. � ^ o - � o £ � � a t 'a c n� T � " =° c o � a !? N _ � '" �`„ o £ H a � ��c y � o o. d o '' '° a n n � m 3=. � � < n c ^ vCi � � N r� S i p £ iN m _ o � �- n p 3?Y m � ° _ _ ' � ° � m �, a - � s � °' o '�' _ u .-. ..: u ^ o _ _ a ; � v � � n' a d _. ... - � m m y o; � - i o n ;��' o G u G � n a m a n S u N -� a �'. U ? � a r - � O n C�' 7 � C � � 1 3 � � � - O �� � 1° �. fNJ � O�i N •n�. v�i � C O d � O O=a O O v�i d $ � � 10 �1.f�Y � � o ? � .�. o o i � o y _ c u n ti = ^ � � ' = < �a o ' � �='_ c o - = '�^ t_ u � c: .. � ' -.-'. 9. n �n c ° n ��€ N o` .,, � :o r. 7. � 3 � . _ ('o � 0 3 m x r� �,; :.� a fDa � o �. " � ^ � �' '. � � N N Q a_ c< � � _ o n 3 i x .� ' C � ° _ , n � a _ �. � = � _ o ^ �„�� � N n � - c� <_ � � = y � n n ° v � < < a .:.:?a � io � °- a '- � o °m '.�, fD = A = 3 S w' c � � n o o "":`_F . , J y . � � � `U .y w � •� OO f� � pS � � ^ � �� A y .. - � o � 3 � � Q � - - � ._ a � :' `t 3 � � _ „ =. P .-F� �. � .�+ � ' a u' u, ��s n S � a �n n c r�' .',^'i �'< O C S - O � � � � vy�i. = S a m < a � j � � - �72 G < vf � C � n C � � .�. �: O N n qC n W < u � •' � ^ O � �J .-. � J M1 a o � i � � _ n .� =. - - � N o '^. o s r. N x i� x� o "' ° c o a ro c o - n � ' N � ° � n � N � > > n o -. 0 3 ro "' n -�-F„`. ti n � a ... n n '�' � a. n 3 c � N <' - N ''iv a 3 ^ r, � °- °- ' = `° °-' �' � o ._� ao ' = N - ° � � O N m ^.,m� � - y „ 2�p = � � � � � � - � - � .ar* �Y', c � n _ � ..'�-,- y'4't � N N pJ V � � Y O � p (?. p < � � D H c c _-�'..-��p 0o a o (p' �: o a � �o -_ O_ n - ap o _ ' � � ^ � � J < -_'� � O p N j J v� � � :� o � 3 r 2 ^ S C - C (D � -1 � � C�.l ~ - N � _ W �^ N W � ' � ^ A O S< n £ _ D s O 5�-_-Y _. o < C .". O 0° - C T H � � S � J =iz� � d H � � tl y - --:5 S t1 C � � N ;�.' � � n � ^ N �; m y �"] ia � � " � -_ N N � J �� < r�+ �. N � ��. r� s ^ > > c < - oo w '�p° �d= �* 'e�'i : N S` � � w � � � � Vm m r � p ',Q_� � m �' � 1 d � 9 . � � i�� ti a N ? o -_= � °O n '3� o :�^ rv (G� c c o c m C � „ w � . < ti y :{/I'3 -�tr d > O � W ��� v j Q D � a a ^ t N � W O F ° m < 3 v` � o f � - � < p c /� � � o ¢ m m m — o Yl. � ro � n' � 9 � � � a `- ' � �3� c �' '° - = n � ?= - � y � c O '(�T. n '- n i: 3 m �^ .a '� i: n Z � n �= N 3 fD � �: .. �dL � � f. : �. �a � f < _ ' r. : K o A < N �I �o ��, � j � � � � N O N � � � d SS��S `3=' G .�-. � � C W 7 O f. �' O (1 ' � � � � w � N = � rI` � _ ':Dr - - o ; � F = = o � � � � � <�u � „ � � � s m _ _ , rD� � = - � o "_ � = _ a = �, � , 0 2 .� � �Q �- - � 2 � n � � � p 'Y - ry ��G �p G + S O O � r N O d''Imp d �_ 'n O N i 2 '�S'.: C � � O N _ x .�� ry � �' O O � � N a - - '�L c f � "' = ':.k'�i 0 "' n c '"� _ ,'^- N ` :-��" � _ � � _ _ w o d � - ' _. m - c - � a � s � s = -:a.-. � � 0= r" rt In �, c £ L = -- . °_ t i-.5.=3 * = - a - �' � f -�.� :P '!. W N �-� O � 7=`? r. O O �=" Q � -�; � � ' n _ - < < r�,T'_ m '� =_ CC =,"t�-`� y ~ W � w a _ _ > m v+ _,�, n � �n o -l� � �� .� =�± "°_" `�� '01t m '''q,' � � �� w "".5 : n= � � eo 'o;� — 9 ��. a � ni 9 ��2 {u O �i " 3� n . _ rr� n o n — o � '�'�� n c c u ` = c � :tA� a < 2 ,��„ i+% � _ ' n ^ � � __ f < a F - , < n - m o i � o _ � i [7: � � n � r' n: C n � C �/�• n C = j � � _ . m '� 10 m � _ - - ti iY1_ � O n � � � � '� ' a L x _ y !:, - d ��i� ° c m c n _ n � ^ � a o _ m ,3s€ - c ' . _ 1 _ _ r = ,,, _ _ _ _ .-. , ' _ � = _ ' '�' _ u N - •• _ _ - r' � F ?.tl. ^ ^ _� � ¢ �+ a � o c : ° ° � c ` � � J � J ^ - r, c � ' s n '�' u L c °' _ C � - - _ � ��� w O - - - - � � _ ' _�f �. � - - ��� - G p � � � r, j n - = J p �� ,� _ _ _ _ _ . � � � � � Dr� - ... n n ' _ - c � _ � 3 _ o = � .w = _ ° � a ;3F ^ c ,. � o �a c ,� n = _ _ � r; " '�^ � N J ' _ n � N o s 3i � Q' �' o c p o = - _ _ - ,., n c n n a � � _ - =a- - �e �� � a � o - ' - - c `. ' ° � �� � ' y� G - - 'o - n ,� C O 7 " r 'X O f N G t .�i � � = _ S_ C a `� f. � ' _ _ _ = n o � � _ - ^ F 'r � H = �'i o _ _ t _ _ _ '" � .�c,�_-��� o K - ° - .-^.'v - 3 � _ � � T =� �� = c n c r. � v = _ " � = r. _. = o� _ 5 0 .� �, - a _S ... � � - ^ ., O N �.9 y n I= c � c r _ _ �� ( u � �. : - A ^ � r �. .n3! o � � u _ C Id C If = _ (� K `^�'_-` m m - r -i; � � f. ' n = - w - �. ,a�'' ry O _� � �i. m - n �_' � 'v3 A W 'lu-= Ja � � W' n � O _:�: _ �� _� _��'a°� eZ t��, ��_ m .�- x � -S` � `�' m n.i � v � ;Og V 9 °�i O �� N D .a O �9� " :3E n i�u; c c y y a p 2 (p� - � a " c F �y.. � j W $ O a � fJ fl p �\ c ° o f c ` P '_' 'n .,.. .. v (c ia c � � ^ .n" - o - " s C n ° C < v/�' J p .. ' _ 3 R c q c w �'. ;4 !a ° c n` - •• - r, .. o a � � � ; o � s ' = G � n -n < � n n � � 3 a 3._ r. - _ - o � ' - v u o n � _ � N f+ � n ZJ = o a - < q � � � ;SS1= � _ 3 � n ._.:..i:. - o m - _ n o ,:�' _ � n � n j + ? = ° o o ° 4l� � � — � � ° � �3= o c - (p � _ n �,� _ c - _ � o ��"� ° - � � � �s � Df; � _ _ � - M e n � � - � � s a '�? � � _ •_ ' � o c o ��� J � = O �'3�=.. H L _ z n z - � �Q�� = c _ � o - < � � _ � ;�=: c m m - � a a m,�`: T n - = C � ti p - � � S N � ���_ _ - ,o - rts ' F < - y N y'_ _- ' c = ''n � _:. n ^ _ � a n �.,� � a 3 �:� � N 9 ? j n � - f = ,d' 3 n � � :Eh� � '� ° � '�� < = 3 ° - _ _ p 'n' � i.;? � - ? u '' - ? ' H 'r�� ? - o � n N _ _ M � c .� - _- £ ' A '° �� ? _ ' s ,_ � .-„ :i n . �"iK..i D W N I �3 � v T 3 r.� --� QN u O n (V N ��F O � p ry � 3 C �. N ^ G 9 jr. a m a - v� .. ro -C::-. v o � -' �: � > > > � � f: � �- � w < ,,, � o ^ � � p ?r."= a � s � w (1 N = _ m u ^. T •• � m - T N � N � � v � � y � ry � � 'O G '�S^-� . S f'. d �= �' (� � `� '� n S � J _ _ N � S - � � '�^�� � n v � m '�- a n -.-r W � d G S O � > >'` � 3 �2 o.w o � �. N O �3 ry � x :/�Y. fD ?si O � �? � w 3 _ [�; � :O� v v R v o � 9 "�S O .�� N � a � i^ � � i�T'.� y R 6 �_- T e�T � •.. < ^ � A n � i = - o n c � < o o n� s c c 'o :�f g o °1. < = � n �� � c L1 o ry c ^ c � `a � 2 {A'd ' o � = m - = G, m m m v_� _. n o � � (p �.� o C° a !D _ n ^ J' n T 7 p � u � = G ^P - • �. � f� _ G Co C O. � a O (J = d r � - J] ^. O n �J �G a0 u C r. � G' � O ' L ._ � = a: _ - _ N -' ^' � c °o a o N � m C n: � �. C� ..~J. J N � F ^ % J U � O N /�n l<D J - � f �.'� r G W C S C � O .r p- ("1 � N y �y/��� (E 7 � � J C d 00 < r'1� N d :] S �,u— � < Q l,y'�qg'f — r t� t4 . Q ' n- U =� f1 3S3 n d _ _ _ _ ° = F � o > � � � < < o � ,!�_ p _ _. � _� u y Oj � f O t � T "Z] J S - _ - a ^ S � - a 5 N v 7 d ��� 3 � _ - _ _ - n � i^ 3 ^ G a n n ... � c � �' � °' r. O ' � ; ^ � ❑ n n a = _ ` - = m �� < o ° _ < � �': a a _ r.' �: i� _ � T m v� " �o �n f' u ap � �v io �G � � n � ,= d � c�-' O � r < � S � � N 3 � r. � � = T _� _ - _ c J 2 n a = � ., n � � aC � - _ ' _ � c c ' � � ° y � � �' n •�. � � c - - - .. v m � � cc � p � v Q y :�� ' o _ r � G y � c m ,n �� w ' � - � _ - l c c" ° � E ' N' u ? � z ° c y o 'fD'_ ' � r i ^ ° r ' _ m � ' _. ra ... - _ -. m = _ � � o = < N � n 3�' ° �< - c = .� < m n �G A �Q:_. - �l - ^ c = " n � n v .�. = .� E <_. _ _. r j O �t � O w - ? Il O O � ° <' F f X = (' � � Oo O � C - ' _ (D �sC � - _ v � '^ < F _ a t � - ° ^ r, a � � � - <. c - N - '+ ��. � m = _ - - - N 5 °C = � : c a N n :3�' ^ c - _ = tl= � v < � ^ � °v - > > n_ • .fY�T Tm - ._ _ � s ° v - � � s .-. a � � � � _ _ ' - _ - ^ � _ � = v � s 3 r J ... ❑ _ _ _ ' r. < c c _ -. o `° ° m Q '- E�-r c,� - � (-, _ " � o n � � a m � ^ o C �: a c - � p= :. a N � v� < � n W d �`� c m - - _ - m � V � m �� o a � �?::;�; _, o _ ,`- £ o c - co � �n � .�. C - r = r � S = C � A � � � Sl] L'. J _ � �' � !> � _ N C N � '-. � V � J N xy. d i� r � `� O u 1] � < � � S� N �.� � O. f _ � F: J O v � .J.. i _ .� = ^ _ L � O ... = c - - _ - ' � ;� m n' < n '" = m - cv = = -_ °1 = > a � =o = � -� _. � _ _ � G � p n _ v j � � � 'JO � � f n � ^ b C � Y _i C 'JI .�-. . n � � v� O C Y < li d � w w w - J p1 lJl = r'aT . A p o 0 3 o w a ��r '° c Q� o, � :- < ;�'� °' ro � o ^ � y � '�i'i5 � ^ T � G O G ^ fD lD 7 N C J � (D A � - -< � I 3 ^. u m w O `;': W m o�i � � O o'� 3 �'� o O F w o ,f� d d � (A � (/� p � � < m Q n ,�`- _ " a o =: A _: O 3 � � '-F' O w � - l0 T Q �� 2 o n y � � s � o � 4 " j y �_S ?_� 1 C � �� < � N :S-.i N' � � ;�: m ''y�% s N �� � �:>' w .�:: _ ,a _ m '� 9 p f � i�� N 9 1�_ � N +�... n �3.x_: ef' � n c m m T m � � w ' n � D `�t� n < v < G G O c O � � a �(/)� O � N N L ^ OO � G N - E � � N � � � o � � '^. n o " iT. "i C b d a' l� O 7 2 G C j 1y'. W � CJ 7 0 G � .� = !� o � a Q. � ^ z J j N n � ° -�z S < °° ^ < d = '�'_' - l° F - ^ c °c 3 �i� ' o r^ � � c �' f °i � m` �`�„ � a �� s � m m °- _ w � °- o c _ o.o R, < :fD�'�', � � ^ 3 0 � I<. � v c � o _ ? N o � .7� � O x � _ ' ^ C - 3 3 � . S � Ll :J G N � � C f O y .�4 �. (u !0 � v� < < N < � n. R �� . n v n �. � � m N n o G � o . 3 N 6 � � � L � N vGi � - � � Si r � a N n � C J N � j c m � � ��C �. v m �l " � f0 ^ .a ° ° ° c � �07°. N .. S _��: N n �G J r� O - �n S � � f1 wyJ e` � N O ^ O � � C � ^ 3 J i'�_= - � ^ � n � !�p � (1 O�a R � pp � v ^ � ry O < O � � d 9 ��:t �i ay c � s : = w n. n � ��:; � I` n w n � C r� � :, m o =a n 'Q' o � � - � r " � _ S `e c° y � J �- _ c � - :�� ^ - '� c < n = " < ,3 ' - � (p} om � - - � _ ' � n �� y � � _ (`�•' m n = : m = ° c p n .- = �e^!.G - R .:.1'+ c ^ n ' n m ' p, :�R,- _ '. n � - o 0 0 - - m a,�`a.' ] - � �� S =S^_ .i � v � N .t€ � � c � n O - � p ry = m C -�..�_ � J ti S o � ,��' �c x n G ^ J n . � n r� °-' _ ''' o �+ y C IG ,^.�, - = C m � __l: C � ^ - _"-� � < ry H � C � � x y t ^ � - ,��, r-_ z � �' o y - N �' � a w � u � a o � o c 'c " � _ � o ':+i-: ° ^ ,:-_ a w w � o ic m = a mp ppp w n m p ia a � c ^ ru Q i.� ° n � c -s.� m �' ^ o ° ^ 3 m fD 3 ,n^ - ^ £ � m � � `n � > > s ` -: r�o '1; SO G T � d T ^ � U !J RI s � O ^n O � 3 CO W ^ � C� � `_-;- fD 1 �u. � lD J ] � � N � O � fl m G 0 - � n Ai � OC � �. y 3 S y� u O �a''���y, o � o� n w d o $ ' _ � m - � � a r� -'_�2 � � a .��y. F � � a u '_. - � s m ' � � � " O1 N � � o W n -.: u a�,e n ' o'� a 3 a _�, - m � _- � �� � 7 x .�t � Q N S � '^ S '�_ m w �- � m 'n- N O� � ("1 \ T. V O .-'�� _ � v a �n V v :��� 1 o r�;; a � � � o ��s � � c n 35. � �- iYi ' � ' j � " c ^ ^ - ° n T ° m `2 0 a o n -��e d o :� c - - �`r-. m o � n w a V7"? m m ^ n �� F�j _ 2 m � - - c� . n m � � ' n n - - r -., _ -� o - F � n �+ o �. _ C m :J J _ � 0 1 O N = � I 7 � .._' �. v�i D m � v v = � _ ' � � � F o n: r ^ " ' O - x x c _ = s � C 'o _ �r.' � m° .J�-. � 's > £ ' c H � � a � j ? y � � �. p _ _ � r =_ a o � � � � � !�� � _ n o s � 3 - ^ `` " = - � � �, � N = `- 7� rp Q d� io � = ' � = F < n �(�'-f=� v v � � - c � � ao s C - �'= r; a � � � � - - = s 2 - I'<_. � ip)� T � a N� < � _ _ = ' C � A n i j n p ^ m r Uv - �T' m m n = < .�q S � - -'tl` G a u S :r m _w � _ = n _ 3 = J � - �;� '�' n o c v�Di � c ro' ' - � 3 `D - 'O n 3':d � N d v� tD _ >. � _ _ C y ^ �J ^ O ;�R 91 � � �. p r � J (J � _ J y � O_ c n i; _ - ^ ,� _ �`. � f � Ti n � _ _ O � �J 'O [�d. M in O � � �n -- r (D (D = n _ - _ C `�G� Y 6 � N p �'- G G = �] �. - �; � O ^'2J d I� � - A �'g l'1 l'1 � .�. � � - �S F C l � < �: G � (D fD ' � - ? _ _ - � d n - 3�+ �n �n g .,� � _ _ = � F _ < c � m .7c; `r S � � m = i = _ n � c o n a n �. � � -� = a n ,3`'s � � o F, - _ .'. ' = va m �' ^ n x ,rlG ? ^4- J N = _ � i: = � n 3 � � _ � m r ' _ r- " ° x ° ' �� < - _ = N � � ' � '`r' T 2' :J � �. . � � � G � � `� @C l] f � O 3. F� S y 'S � �. ' � f. y 1 G p � F (1 - � � , � � � G �3"i''� a ...>: � " o = � - _ n c � � '� = _ - n c � = m - = I�. '�k C " = r � .: m` ^ e �O '- � m > v, d � ° '_' L � < m - _ 5. g _ o . � n o _ � - o -� � _ �� �y ,� >,.,� - J F I= .t. �7. a > a a a iT,^ v+ a w iv r� :_�= �g w a m p r.� v y r. F- �=�=. N ft �Q O � N W � N "�. L = ft. �p � �- �+ 'O `� y ^. N � O O O � T t�n .�-. < d - � 3 - < � - � � �zy H � O ^ O T a N O � a � N T �° — �o in � m �. �_� u � � N n �`' a � a � m o o ���'-x - m � o �� ao d `_.�=: o � � w a n � y � m T a 3 3 - ro N -< ' � r= ��n �. m �; x Sq � �� w �, _ n� m m rrn m v 0 :�- ° '�_ r.i a ��i m O �z. � '�i; �rr > o � (1 c D r. � � D - - - D � a n - y •" a � o r a = c a - _ _ n < n s a ��� a a a o Y a = � a = o a I� � � � a �41s � � � L ?. o n � � _ �� _ - _ _ o o c � i► � p ty o y d � N � _. i; _ ' � '- 3 � v Z� r' � u � -' �° m � = - _ - - = � � n o _ � _ _ _ � „ � � < n_ 3 ° � - °' � � I - _ o � ^. ^ ^' a �.+_ r� v, � � i � .. = � _ - _ s N �� = ^ Tn cN m - c = _ �' = g = B .(D_: j � �p ^ ' �n '^ - � _ ^ - .� "_ c n ^ '�.� 9" p � °' c a o � � � � _ � � �� < ��� p C � O N � - � � = o ^ �. � i�� 3 = aa � ? � n r. o � , i f o a N w , m o � - ' - = c y �q � '< J CI � � � �' - G " G m. W c n F .n,. � � ^ - _ 3 = �.� _ = n m y�_ - � _ � -., 3 ^ " � N � m � _ - F. � � " `r'�. ^ 3.� � ° - �„ _ n (J 0. F .V � N J V J' f � r .- S O ,:l�e < QO � C -' lS0 !` �, r ll � J N � f�l ��. � � � - '. O. < _ � _ f n `^ � -��:Y . ^ � _ � ��G '^ � i _ O L � O �D.0 O 6 n W < W = �; f _ _ � O � ��' > � i A /��" � fD J S O � � - n N f 'l.l� = � O O - fl - fi - � t� < ^ R `�t c -� � - _ . - - ^ a � m n ' N. o = - ' � = c m y �`� f� S W <W _ - _ �: - _ � � �� _ � � - ' �-� _ c y � � o - _ - ± � oa o ..;�x=� � � � N � a •�•- n � = c o < ,� _-e = o v a '" o - - � c a .....e - ° n o - _ _ � .. ... _ ` v =, n i _ _ �' =. i: < y '�_ .: r� _ � " C , c y' 9 ]JO vFi = O � f � � � e` s �'c � v. � m.w C w y O � C � � � C O vO _v�rt 3 �. - �' � _ y C'' n F� u ] O fJ n ' f �= c N e r. < - _ � _ _ _ e' ,� ;`. ^: (U ^ (J C �?- n ,< _ O -i�'x: C J Ol .�. � � _ _ I� N 1 s-F l � (D � ^ T _ � S n n �. C � ' ^ '' = = i; ' ^ f. = ��.,� `�; Y^ t'l' [- ��1 N 't�� R ,-� O _.-��M � - �c i�i¢ �.t 'Z, �/�,s WG m .h:: � i�3 w � O O� o '�� 'o ��i N a tO � Ci- a �3:'. �� fDt: y_' �+tU - _ ^ - - ,- n= � = - = C? C u n � ci -^ C o cy n ��.: = _� �c � c r, s ^ ., a= � � �a a. io ^ � io o ^. c F � ^. � �"_, - � _ - _ = r - _ - � _ o_ ^ C m n v � = a� m � = r = t _ ^ �. � c =. o' .. = °_: �: < �:^ G ^ o - � ^. 3 ,n., � - . n' !% - - - u c m o m - N m .`D 3 �i: r � !: r �; _ _ _ - � _ ' O � _. � y � O_ n C = T _ _ _ _ � J y ^ . fl C � ] Q � _ .�/� - r '!. - �� � � O � � � ¢ n. � n N (p � !� lYi� ^ � _. r. . � j � _ � '� � C, v ro n £ � J v ro f °- �. 35k - =.rn - - _' 1 = r o= �' � . � < '� m io a ti ^co' _�`�.' V 1 ` = - � j _ _ - _ v n n ' aa j = n c 'S.f (-! - - r 'J+ - n � (: � �n'� f�.l � ^ �J '^ n n ��t - �- y f < = n J' = _ n ^ �� � � m C � o � ^ w c _ v r. � ^ ° j c _ y � N � o° - n " c o'� m �; ' � _ s �� � 3 _ _ �• = m o _ � N � < � ? o o C7�$ °� � � � = �_ � = o` ° >� v' � m �n N = m y � c � � o �} _ f = M r t� _ < ^ _!^ � c N a n n :D:: n m o � _ _ _ ' r. � �� _ � o � � o _ o c � � '-`' a v F `�r_ _ - � � ° � o f m ° � R ° y „ 'fD� r _ �; > > o � ��{ _ � f > f = � � � n N 00 � O C � � �� p '.-�:, � r �4 �, � f i� ^ �' n � O � � N ? 7 ^J f] ¢ G �li � C' � f T _ � ' � � f� = � < �'J � _9 "' �! C ` i fJ fJ ��t� � � n 'i' c �' n � - l � < � G' ` < O u O � C y �P _ � _ � � x �' s _ �, � � ,� m � F i � < ra °_ � i 3� _ _ „ � _ �� _ Y` m . F ro '. � o ,• '� � (' F .n ,f � = < t� y y .n. £ � � n a - O CO ^� c _� Ri � - n y _ �: _ _ ` n � � ; O n y � � '-' o '1=u' C _ � �n. 2 � t� � � n z ' _ c ' _ _ = ri ^ o c� =" � o m � - �` = i � i i = � r. c _ = . r� tn J _ � � � a � ,,,b•�. _ _ - ' = n o ' •. c y £ � °O Q :� o � � d '_,�' o j�� -= =� r' � - .--, n r' =' � p^ �,? '.^ � n' � N � x J - 1'i C � - ~ ` - C r J � !f a � N .. � � = r. _ o r r - = i: o - � C-• r, � r. < � � 1� ^ �r-' �- n " � � - ° F: < ```' � � O m< � � _ G .: - °_ - _ _ _ = � _ =i -, � m " c J J n C : f. I � c� � � J � u n � •-�L�- � r- .G f _ _ I` 1. fJ� .^. Y 1 J� y (J J J � �� � y ^ � .. � = .. r _ _ � ' _ .. nxc'^ x:^. � - -a - y o -xa m' � s�z: �� I m J � �L y � �. � � 2< � C O � G j � u y � p � '{'� N F� N < (D N .d 'S ^ G N _ ,i�, � � � rp � y � � -^. s � � o m � a � m w a � `-'� 3 � T u a c � y T _ a v � D o u �n C � a 3 s tn ":�i.B '< � o � � n � n N � � F � � T rv � � H _ a � u t� y < n n "=+- a. f ¢ ° a° F » -:� n o_ i� y ° ,�', ^ � o .�= o m � n � io � � �^ rv '° � � � t v ,�'"? 'm o �+ ^ '' o �` m ' --.� n 7 ° � n -�o rv � t�; S fJ � d O ��3 4 ^ u � � m u �_�i� � - � O �. '�c:'a d ^ ^ J � - � � N d r G � u ��- kQ)v x :.�s N S� � � w _ n= m � m 9 p Q� v v ,�_ W a �_� o N �� a �`< Mt � - > _ .n � +� - - v r°, D :fC� - I � f. �- - f � = r I C � < � � d ���^ (� n - r i.' � Sf d � �\r n lJ (: � W N � f. �G .-i i � � - < � ^ � ..�s fJ _ r N-� (� ,.� ... � � = c nl �' n , � _ _ _ � _. l: f. � .i (fj /'� :yl� !�� _ C. !: . - F � t�._ � f. f. f. = � ��� � _ - _ �� � _ i = � J '�� � p � _ = r N �.. < r � r f. r, r, n - _ = = I-.�1 _ � �+ _r. : _ C 3 � n m o � ° o '�� _ �' = .. - r. - a ° a n � N "�LL: - n r 1t� � ^ � n � �• � ^ O '�l r — � �.r _ � n .�-. .y. C .J N C J ^ �f.� n J � � � n d ^ A � � � f� - _ = : O 7 � O 'O ��cL _ - = r = _ O � � � J '' � f p �D�. _ _ __ _ � V o � N y � � 9 9 3._ - _ = � .. � ' .Q_ J J �i y �i �^ F = l� � � � � ^ (: = n J J T � = a �� 5 - = ° - - n c o � � s c y �� = _ = _. J r. � � .. � � � o .3� x _ _ � - T o ' n ^ - o " "Ki i: �, - ' = iC � vFi n ci O � y '� < c -. n c n :� n " --•-- o t' r 6 p � � O = r _ S � .n �: = _ T C � G n � C < y � �C i � .-r Jl J "T`�` '- - � ' Y n H' 3 = � V, -�- = - ° _ � rt � � N ' '�''� 0 = - - _ -' ° ,�.-, ° ^ J d ,;rs c = - � - ==' � r - - � < � u � - < '_^. �a � O .� N G N __ < _ � - � J � 1 J !t r ��...�� f. �< �` � � , � � N � �� f' � O �� d �= tp �°C_ i •"� A;•': f+ ^ pSj � � U �5-� � S (=- �G lG C � o � � y � � �'�' n _' > > ^. T -n� � � a - = _ j . ... s � v+ �'' n - m a .- =�.'. N � d C � N Y� a s - � _ o c d c � �-.-v: � n a .. - '° s _ a ''' o � a < � �i -o o � s ;t�.:! `p - 3 c ' � m ^ ^ =-`" � G � Y � m �� m - < f° � - n m -_;. O .� � ��.F,� � 3 ;�". m m :,?� � x - � �� I W ., i : "�= m N 9 � Q'G cv 9 %�•a 6 'o H yj 9 �� O �� N i� i�r" N 6 � ,rrk n � a �' i �J �^ = - > c � o = _ _ {. _I_� ,fDa �N a T J. .. Ji - n 'L C _ � < � c -_: IG r 2s , (A;` o m o � =' = V n - � ° u n � � _ ^ n r, ° F - c ��?: .: � r � - r. 1. � '_: > > Gl � � �' f � � (: a s ° � °_ N - - '< _ .. O r o _ - - .f _ _ ' � ' � = - - - n= d (1 ~ � � ±• - � �I� �•'�.. f � �� v � J Z � � �/. u j � f.� f. 2 i n - J — _ _ _ fC t 4/��. ' O = - � .�.. t _ < C � - - _ _ I- � _ �Y/ o � - ' - ' ' - - - =v 4' - _�a o w � - _ _ _ T - � _ � Y - _ ' T� Q � � Y 4.� I� � f � f. � f �� �F J lG 1 �+ ^ � F $ (r' .-. � �: � _ ... � �' T O � f. _ � _ _ � _ =��Y_ � �.. �' r — :� ^' y C = _ _ - _ - ° - - r _ o ° :OI.k, y" �n _ _ � O O � � � (` = - .� � � _ f. � f. f 'J+ � —� r (' r (1 •�� � m Li ^ _ _ ' � _ .: _ .- _ �f ^ J tr-� - •- '�'' a - - ` - - � °- = rrt'*+ � - � _ i � - i r. G r. - !i � �3�: _ - _ � � � � f � � � r'��I� O ° < = _ , _ _ _ -: � - _ _ � :D: N 01 f: f � _ _ � �.. f. �. I r fi _ = R o � _ � P _ � _ _ � ' = a d � _ c 1 r. _ _ _ y �C. m - r n v r. _ � - � ' _ O :�� � m �.. n > � _ _ • _ ,�, _ -g<r < tn � ' �. = � < i < 1 _ 9 •�. f. . - � � O ` "� � � � C �� _ _ C p � ` +� � � - _ _ _ _ - � '��� � N = _ r. � ti ( +' r. �; G � - - p- �'i l0 . _ � (�,1 _ _ _ � � � _ -i � � f. � n - N �3-� d !O � <' � G G � O �_ � K fY� NN - - f - n � _ � i. f. �n'L�1 .�. fD C � �" � C ^ - �=x _ f. fi ' � �(5 � �' (' 1 '�R � � _ _ n J+ _ � (:� r f� f �' Gl - � y - _ G y = - r'� . y d = , r G � V _ _ _ �''i' - f. S N � � - � r C IJ = •'i�]r- ('j � f � � - � r f. � - '1�� � - _ _ r, `� _ _ ' _ _ m _ _ _ - _ _' r. _ - _ af''S' V. ^ � ' f. � � C. _ � - =-'Lr S � � � `f (.� � �� r' G _ �`a.= a � '^ J r ^ V `i�i,�'J� � f �� � f. � - ';i'� ' G _ � / - - d f 'n J ` C f. � I� ..� a = � _ __ ' ^ _ _ _ - R', ,-."; f � T r, v N- r. Iy� =`4 I', rt _N i __ ; � r&= � � ��� 'J N i�u� � �:�� .�. '�Ti.-, � r- w - = �� � in r= < � � n �`' 0 0 ' _ ' .� � '°�;�'+.3 G � � R - 7 S�- N i r 2- t��` dn m �: - '� � �� w � '(7 �. m 9 p :�.'`t�' � ;`�t p :�!_ N O �� '° 3: a •'r� = = f? > D � n 's c � N � > oo �- c � �J - _ n � _ � - � n ° � ^ - � N -�`: = " _ r, n 5 = 3 � �i ^ n a � a f � J �D n ._. 'Vf�-. � � � 3 6 = � N n � � G = � � � `�^ < a =3 ^ � N N M1 � � � .- t> � n S S C O u _ m y O Q C in. "' o � _. 9� � � � c a a � N o m �i' = � ' °' o '^ n _ o G p � �j _ �p � J o h f' T � N O � h O ff Cl . < � fD '� � �I'. � ` i ° � a o � J < � ra � m - 3 i _ � n vo � C _' o . ��• �� C R n � � =_ N � � m - - TJ v O � - C '�f� � - U C � /� r � ^ � J � J n 2 N � (] p y n < '�V'' � p y� r. � .- ^ _ ry L, ^ � ^ O 0 � O ^ N � � �? S ^ � :SU T f. i - N � J .�- ^ � O J a N �y r: � J ... � „L n < .vT^��'1 f O � C n ^ ? .2< C _ � N fu O � �' �y] _ � � � _ = C S � � � C = fl � O - G " � < • J � C m S v�i O N � S � _. � �iz - _ ry S e�: r �' � J � O1 (J !� �` .� � N G d A n .fc O n y C� J ^ G p o + p �. � r f. O � _ � N 00 N = � C N - � �; o n , � a ^ � D:: ° N ' ^- < c = � = '" � n � N � o '�i N � _ p r. �' �; � N � °m �? o !� o � - o o fD : _� � �' B o � � �, j � = n °_ '. c = < A '3��, _ ` _ la � � � � ' = j � � _ = rv Q: T ' n n C w ] � _ '- �' = - � 3 '� .�. _ _ _ ? � n` o c o m � � � N � - a n n _ =_ c ' '.fD=�, ' _ 'o y G o N" � a � < � " m n o � �`F = ` ' n � ° ^. � s o = r� � =. c c F -e.� S - ti m m o a � c,^ = 'm �o : - - _ _ n .i � c � c� n � m m j y ' :--<. � (� O � S r�+ OO � l� _ 1 � yx��� _ ' � (C (J � J K .-. � ' N "J .':Yi _ - s' y m � "' o c m m .� p o o ' - R d lD � � 3 �v�i - � � ID � _. .� _ � �- � ^ 'a j (, u 2 y � N W ' ' N O �� O � S c _ < ±p. rI.. N _ CT - ... � O N ? ` � =7.i r'"' y J fl n J ?.� � � Q D •�i Li.� = v � H y � < � �' � � 3 J l. rs.� - � =� � a c �' r� � � c'': - � n ti_' n G n n n � - � � � - N Ir' .- _ C � - <. C � � - - � .�. C C = � '7= '� C ro � � C 2 -''��-'1i � _ v m' � _ '+��e _ ' = y I�m .3F`: -c n � ;�., lA N � N :��. F� a p F- - � a y � �v N � � \• � O O — � - J !D O t�� U a � � � � P� o '� - N _ < ci �u ��: m � � �s_ � m o k . � , 4: n ' �� ti�" J � N fJ �a^ 3 � , x N �� idn m ;y. '-` S' � �w : n. m a o o� - � ;3: a :�� w a w o �.; a '7�: S'►-, N n � � G � ^ — � fD fJ t0 N S 6 ^ - - f ^ � � Q •^ 1 (p�. - y � C � < = ' a o o� c � �' = � - - n a = _ r [N� d G � ^' v � O tE N u � ❑ ❑ � '! _ �$ � t r. = ' - C � i�'= n [D `G � W _ C _ _ f f_ � .' r = � f. C � (0 _ fJ S � (0 _ i _ ' r J, - ;�r � C O O � O � ^ � � N y � n i. ` = .= �.. = (, = = .. ' c - - (Nb � Q .� � v_�i f = _ �' fi f� _ f I i�n f. 'I � d � C J � a . � �. � r � � � f � '� c " C � � m - ' < ' _ _ c m Q � p � y o �' �. i � � � � � ' _ = r�$ � _ � y _ � =' l. r f f. � � O f - � - = ov� < � � ' n nc .- _ - = - c = c F � 'Z: N � _ n 1 n = = ^ - J - .0'i m (; ^ oo z y _ � ' ' v = n r c - � y - _ � J y � � � ? ^ � � r ^ i _ - � � c _ _ 4 �� G . � � � _ � n _ - � c $ ry;'- = c � -QJ3 K - .. n_ - ,� _ ... � .. . g m � � � '0 m � _ ^ _ _ _ _ = c c c ' 3'= _ o - ��i+ f1 n � � _ � - _ r- " - � _ rt p � c = c y o < z m o - " - - = c = � .D`- ao � _ - _ � � � o a ° = _ ��' n - n `�� S n � < .-. � _ - _ - • = o � J � a m v .-. - ^ r, _ - - _ r. _ y m o _ � a _ _ -v - C = - = `� - o (�a � - _ � . s m _ _ z _ '3��-.. ' � � c C — r • � — ❑ _ - r - 9 /��y, 7 � P� � � r f � � � � = � � Y1�5 � � Y ' '!• � � _ _ (' }` �� � � m < _ _ ' _ r, r = � - m � m �, � c � _ ' = ' o _ = r. _ - n (p� G O J y' � S C G C ^ (: � r � Y ,� C � m !D O � S - � — r C � - :�' n ' J � � � � � � � � � _ u c C w � N f t` �. r (' _ i' � v�mi fJ - - S S � = � '—' - - � � " �' ('� - ___ � -� C� � S � � = .J-. _ r � C � < � = � ^'$. ^ r� vi m m w - = .. _ c - - = � .° . 3 I < 3 . " - - - _ � " � �n c � n � =' �P�' � r. _ .! i _� O O C ^ ti O � �_ "r. � r f ' � c :- ,'�E v � N .N-^. (� [` .^^J-. � ? _ — 1 � � r `T'� C � � � O �. �D n G � _ f. — n _ �: � �. � � N � � < f. 1'i F �' � fi � � < _ J � O � _ _ _ _ � _ _ ,fl _ ^ fJ ` ` 9 +. � N. S G - �.' � — — p -�+_ _ °i ^ _ � � � - - • — — - - . - — � •�- _ � f — � .• ' ro' = C�� e C m N < ? = c r C x' n n °- ".�z � :� c - = c F � - - _ _ , -cc 1 - ' '-' G ac ?� c '_' _ = - =' n� = _ r. - ��: 2 n a lo _ _ � � _ ' _ ' .,�'� � � � �, > w -�_ '_� � .. �.-. � � � :�� a r� !: < � t�- 3 m ' 0 - n =�. - o � ' fi� �� :_` �� �d< x '�{ N S+ � �_ w � _ n. m m 9 p 'O; � �. 9 .�y O -�3 w a � ,�� ry L, n t�� �e= .� "' a N o o � �'� n y a m - � � ¢ o m m +�D-� < °c, ° : F c � s � a � �� s c 3 � _ _N',t_� � � -- m � o � 3 - c _ m . 3 Q �, m a a u c m �' � ° m m o � m n - � m w o - � n '" _' ? o � � � a < w � < � v � < � S 4 < o c _., o o � °- N o � £ � c, C>' � D D O w J !D <, fi . G ] ID < C `�ss§ X w o a ri ?. w o 'D o � m °° 5, a a .�: a � � � � ^. n - n u' � °_n 3 s t�'� � a a � s W �� 3 N ? s F ry N J � � o v � n � � n' �:3� � N ^ - � Y' �fDi> - � o �� "''', = '-' ° n ro v� .y N s � �' �. o o O1 o d . o ro v m - a � o m o c � � = o_ � d m G .fl7.i s � � c m o ? '_ =. o � � .°: = nm m 1'�.� o � o m o' ,- n w n � '�J' y = �p Q � �` � _ a � = �; ti m � i m n N d ° Ol.'- o N n s � p o � o� c � � �.� � �..' �^ = a 'o oi n �.�!L a � � � 3 aa . . m o- Qu m o � y o wy � sa a � = `° � _ < _ :D�; � N d g � � m m < c m m s � -� n '�.: � - '. m y �, n � y � ry - � n 'w 4 G Y _ _ � N (� •• G' � � (G'S W � �^. O :IDC� ^ � N n n = ' < - m � = •- , o o n n :3=. o' c = " o c � a o ° � m � F � '. � n :CL: � ^ � � � _ N - = �J - - _ . Q 1 d �n y (U S C�. !D y `� l9 � lD O (E �s tD O O ^ 6 ? = O = 9 C N L p S ] 6 �.. y � � � c � a - n ' � �D � � n n �:3 O 0 < c o c v = � � v c � � � : c 'x' rtti p _ � � � n n � � a � m ^ m -'f' - n � p ,� � v, n �' a' - - �-'-�, o '^ 3 � < dw a r. _ � � � ' � N � � m N � - O � O. N �� � = ^ c m 'F 5 G 'v t' ^ m � n o f _.__:� GQ � c m _ ... ^ s n - '�!f< _ _ c m _P c n °O m o a f o < °- �,�E. � � N C = p d J - _. �D � y ... Cy , c < � �° mOf dOJS a � .. °�, � d N m N �y � � � L•• � A y �I y �+-i 'u o d n m m m � y < � m _ -�G•' � � ? o a p c � o p o = - � m �:�S.�:E1 - �n � y Oa �i w Q � n G p � -- � �,f�i � � < � Y O = � j G � � !p � O J � � - S _'Ja u < � 1' N �^ � _ = N (p Qp � �_ ^- y �' < = o o O . .... � - ' __ 'i 3 � 1 c ' y `" ^ v�, ;n � - -, n o � � °-' n c - ��E m c !^ � � ° m � ��� �i c - :, � � c w c m 'o a o � iv =�t� �, � o m 3 - o < o 'o 0 0 = 3 c+ � ' n 3 � o o � - o �. � 3 a - � c y - � ' 3 0 0 �. m - __ w ? ro > > � n f° � o o d " �+ � � _ N - d � �a m a m .- 'T�= � m � F u _ i y ic < v � in 2.� - � � o u n ro °' N � c a Q n .--'s o u a 3 c a 7 � m a � � - o a ^ a o � v --a` - - n � o. u ° s ? 'o - _ � � �„ m a � °1 � m w 3�� � s � � � s�r -, d � - �0 3 n � �' rv _�;� -�.�. m .jY - Sr! � �3. w C V ;n, m m V O `O?3 � � �� w a -�s_ � N {�'L y ��:j., e�Fe < ? _o < ad � a � < � � 3nm _ a � S � ti0 �� � f�I14. - o n n o r. � m < c � m n a� � � n' =' n_ n 9 0- n C n � ° �. O O � O � J C �i O � �n 3 H C N p £ n O O C 'Z� 'n' y ° � o a = _ - d � Q.. c � y 3 y v � d � ^ ,n.= � u n - w a '^ .. � - � . � �.: � � u `= m S = `° u � � _ n m C m ° `'�' � v�, � � I J cl � � � � c � - Q w O � n c !D a �j 9 W •�` . m y °'„ O � m J �D`i�i j a .. o o � _ � 9 �' a m m n °^ � m c m ^' m ,3X _ ' m m N � w n o � ^. m '^ � o_ � c <' .�c � � o C G < O C 7 ^ �. N a G i C?. v Ff D O ��'f- 2 i7�. = � N � (D d fJ N _- l0 O J ��- � � � � N Ct � 'O � J N y '�^. `. o � 1 9 ' � � n � - a C j � � y n � � ^ j '�, n o, a o <. c ° '�^ m � � � � o � n v m � � m "y;y � d 30 _. m n '^ � > , o � ] m o n - r�c c�i - 3-`' o `� .. - _ = � n � m < � _ � a � = n +v- m a � 3 � m � � � ^ a ' �' N � ^ m a o � � D,y - m m a � � - -i o n o � °' o m m �' � � =' ' - ,- a :� v, s c (p c c �. ir a ��i� j G c J - - C S 0�0 � (E � � � ft _ 1 O�C� = C O "(Dp - ,ry n c c = '^ N C S � .� v; o � v p � �, 9 i�� y - �p o C o _.oa v+ S. C � m � � �, m c� n 'p �+ �- � � — .C= c �� �' � . � � � � J � � t"^ o � ^ � c � ,^-. �. :�✓ 3 G ? � = ° � ly a a rc � � y " � n m o a _. c m m = N n ' � ^ H (p�. I � O - m � � n 3 a y n < " '^ �-° � � ^ i �� '' = � T " m O � N '^ � � r? �p a^i < ? � � .. �., " n m a 3 a ° _ _. �aa � m c�' � � _ m � � - = 'o vm, . = " Q � y .. _ "' m T � A " o "' o � s< y c � � r: o _„�. � � � y ,� � ° o � o `° 'o c �o. n a � ,=�J_ � � � '_^. u, � -., o � � �� ro o w � j � a _ _"'r. ° a n ¢ r' c m o " s m _. � " ^ % � '*�:F o, � � v 3'+_ 3 �+' n � 3 u ^ y = F, v o. p .��.:T � o. ^ a � ° Gl < m`° y n 3 F � � � � p o m o � a � `B � � � _. c � oo $ n °- m � -?`� 0 o c vo � p n .. _' � :� ^ a .°�F;. (D O O '4 B N a L _ lD � ^ C ? ` O .� � � = ? - _ � ry fyl '� N O. � y �, f0 � .Ta¢�� ' a m � � r n J S C N N � 40 ��'` a � � ^ � n � � � y,� d G S 3 (l N L '^ � ao C � � �. m m n d � 3 � Y � 1 N 'L w W N ry � y 7 Y S = J � �. _ It� 6 'w R y y C f� d G C y --�+-y �r =�:� �� .t�%a_ �� u+ - A - n "c9:,J O - � _.-"s "�. _� �N m �:. Y �/ L 7 \� = n�: = � � , o,� - a :�_ � ��3�w � �, ° "c_ n .3:, a 'f? m �c�i O1 3 m m m "�2• m x � in w 'N� a S - i�:i u - N ,'�> . rv (7a �c � .�.: m - - 4 N - �-. Y = � � `" m � 'm rn-o m � � � ���:.. �� � - c = — � = = = 7't = c � i - G c: � " i� .. 3 � '(p'_ _ � n �. ^. j �� � � ^ ;�n � n .-. :� .. = ^ ; td;� ^ ^ _ � w V � N y r. y c 3 �y c r. o . �+ �i - � '�' ^ � _ ry = = ft � n � . . - 3 � m C C, �-e c N � � � 3, c � = v '1 ^ � = O "? c -' _ i � - ? _ _ o ;D. _ - = a _ _ - , n _�7 � = c n `-° _ �„ ro � � ^ a � " c £ c o o,J., ^ � o �.�� ' � c - c � `D � rpi 'Q- � ^ _ � _ � < - c � � _ = `_' n i�iz _ � � - �' � _ _ � c a t(p� " m 3;� � � _ ^- n f - � F x .�i a J Z C ^ � � �M._,'� _ � (p n C � � _ � m x C ^ c _:.-.a c f � i. � N = � r�+ C i,;,,st c � c ' � � _ � - � r. ;,^i � � ° c C - N i-. � _ F - N N ` ry J C .� � u, u�: . n c � u ,9 @ n . v, _ -�� _ � r � - o ; � � ` _ < — c = --�` � � � s � si G G � � � � N F '. ` N ° � In � � c �� N . Q � ya: � k _ ' v+ ''�-, m _� � m p _ �D � -Ym O - p O � _. n -�. y.s _ � � a O m � r�v �o D � = o ' _ < c v� - � n = � o ,�� � o i i � :�= 3 -'S'-�-3 o -__ p _"v < _�y J _ W ;�` ��3 K /''r� N �.S/ . J `� W � � T 9 p Qi � 4 9 .�_ a _��: w V O �_ n ' - n '3:; .�� Ifn ' '�' � m ° o m m m ' m .� x I� D e° a F D � � f+ a i.+ 'H' I� � a ^ 3 ° f. m � n > o Ic , � i� C a !_:� Z � � � u � � n � � � � o � I� � � f �: f wss � :. : � a O N "' ¢ K N o N '�� O � O_ O� - _ i+" Tn " ° = � c � ` �° � � ic � � +��' A v °: ° � � c - - _ ^ - � C � �A�� m � - N C � ^ Q O yVi .. m � m � s � ' r: o O � ^ H � a Zx. o� a '" m a .N'. F< N _ S17''d�-. Q C � ' O O ^ y J N f�" � n C) u �- C IfJ � � N � ��^.�F S f1 S � U C � : � /���. � O) � � C � � � = V �W='. � Q' � 00 'S .�y F I= � N J � < � O ^ d ^ 3 _ � _ � s ° _ - " " � � � � D' 0 o t � � - � � < � ��4 a = o ^�'� . - � '^ ?. 'n ^ � o � - m o m o '�_ - S s ` o = _ � o - n A -;3.-��_'�' o u � c '� = � � � � ��3�i g � va u L O ' y u -. 5 n c �� 0 1 � c � c '�?j n �7° . � ^ - � _ _ a � n y A�_ � ^ o m _ � c <' �. 3 o n �3.-' l o _ x � - ^ - .-r�: _ ;, w q � _ w ° � � c " w� - � = � � � � � � `° ° ° � = �° o � -- e --� -. v ° � o n � o � a n' �� s � I� m y � r, n n � 3 ^ =� � F n � • <' n v � F � =� ,...: - � 3 1° IF ,- o = < < "��s'L-_' A � s - o T � " - c N Ic `.: - °: n - �� c y � � ? c � N - ' � � < c < ' � �- J O q � �- „ � " .`� j (> y i`',4 � _. O `c ' s � ti - ° _ r^ - m _ n _.._"' n � � '� u � � C IJ � � ��_ �� � �r F �L a = - _ m a .y - � r o .. �,; �� � '4'ses � � � a '_- n Z '_ - _ � � _ c f _-5: = O -� - _ c in y�- N � tir _ � O -_e t> > �l _ �;--. ^�A C +.:t-. .F -�'_y r ..x..- :�-; _I�� '�Vt2 T. ��°_ m �e_ x � �_� w m nA` v p -�1 � 9 '�£ O � 9 •�n �W � ._ a =3,� �i r- R m v _ c' ci c. m o - 'n � _ :�=. � � � � .�_' c o - � y � .V1.". � � n I� IN ~ m � �y C1 r� ���' a n i; �_' z O1 � � "(78 � .. �. F ^ j n � � ni c - c c c - � � - '"_ c � � ic I` ° c r� o ° o. � c •�`._� ._ v In c n =.. m N c n 3� m � ^ `" Ic _ r _ � ,fD._. = ' � � ; a _ ^ ��h � '" °_ n a - � c u � �� o c �. ''- a - � � = : _ � � - � °_ c .�' = 'c c _ ��nn ?, = — n' c +41�. .- ._ � r _ _ „ �^ ` ,� o d L d � � �„ � n - _ ,".�'., c lu = j � � � � � t - c � � n u - ��; � - R J 7 `G ry IC ^ (D ���, ^ c � �r � a • � < m = o �� N � G t� — N I= v. A r�3� �. � � �= _ C - C n Q° ,� O N ' � < �� < � � ^. i . , 4 =' n ��� _ `° c o c S °_ � ti �P^. - � 3� C - � � � � Y �r�r. � N C _ � C (C < - - n � _ _ m °_ c ,.=��' _ N � = r. _ _ m � � c = w � 'm.- _ - _ - � _ s,�; n n - _ � F = � E..�: ? ' - � 'c - G " �� j _ n rt - n .Y'"XF c � - _ I: _ - c _ _ - v < ^ _ ^ � J _ x I_. ".�.£-' � - � - - if: _ - - c Ic ��_. � - � �' _ = c - - c - I.° f � .� " � �� :S- 3=�� :�:- �� N �� n "5: � ��:? J �s9�. [a�i�' r`C'e: • T: 2 s�D;r 501: m Kx _' �. ? �� w �i - �n:: = a o �- v `�� 'o t�_ a � ° '.C=? °- !3�- :K:: fD' � ' �. �2. f�: � ; � �� � � = (�° n a c 3� - _ � '(�. ti c �,x n n '�r. 0 � � � : < n �'" - � �w _ r� i� N G � O — 3 �1T !J R �S x f a z � o �' - c � a 3'=; J � m �fl. O = < i o � •�e c n �-� U � � N � � w Pf o _ rs�£'^.�_'' c' �� � � _ y � � o ..^ii�cr-' :� c —;._ C G - O �__T C fC'� �j U..ws � �. � � :� C a 4i _. � :.F� C C S�� RESOLUTION NO. 2015- RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY’S GENERAL PLAN TOINCLUDE HEALTH AND WELL BEING POLICIES AND OBJECTIVES IRECITALS WHEREAS, in recent years, public health officials, urbanplanners, and community leaders havebegun to more clearly understand the directcausation between the built environment and physical, mental, and social well-being; and WHEREAS, the City of Chula Vista’s General Plan serves as the “constitution” for future growth and development and is the foundation for establishing goals, purposes, zoning and activities with the goal of protecting the environment, maintaining a healthy economy, and ensuring equitable treatment of all people; and WHEREAS, the concept of healthy communities was included in the 2005 General Plan update; and WHEREAS, in 2012 City Council voted to approve a General Plan Amendment(GPA)to include additional healthy community objectives and policies to both the Land Use and Transportation and Environmental Elements; and WHEREAS, in 2014 the City launched its “Healthy Chula Vista” initiative to further explore opportunities to promote health and well-being throughout the community; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendments would establish healthand well-being goals and objectives throughout the General Plan; and WHEREAS, the proposed comprehensive General Plan amendments would assist in the development of city-widepolicies and programs that will improve theCity’s physical and social environments; and A.Planning Commission Record of Application WHEREAS, pursuant to California Government Code section 65090, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on the subject GPASeptember 9, 2015, and recommended that the City Council adopt the Resolutionapproving the GPA; and WHEREAS, the proceedings and all evidence introducedbefore the Planning Commission at the public hearing on the subject GPA, and the minutes and resolution resulting therefrom, are hereby incorporated into the record subsequent to these proceedings; and ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 135 Resolution 2015-_______Page 2of 2 B.City Council Record of Application WHEREAS, the City Clerk set the time and place for the hearing on the GPAand notices of said hearing, together with its purpose, wasgiven by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, at least ten days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, pursuant to California Government Code section 65090, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing onOctober 13, 2015on the subject GPA NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council hereby finds and determines as follows: II.COMPLIANCE WITH CEQA That the proposed project has been reviewed for compliance with the California EnvironmentalQuality Act (CEQA), and City Council hereby finds that the proposed activity was adequately covered in the previously adopted General Plan Update Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR 05-01) because the proposed objectives and policies are consistent with the previously adopted General Plan Update. Notwithstanding the foregoing, City Council also finds that there is no possibility that the activity may have a significant effect on the environment because the proposed General Plan policies will result in Healthy Communities policies and programs and no physical change to the environment. Therefore, pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines the activity is not subject to CEQA. Thus, no environmental review is required. III.GENERAL PLAN INTERNAL CONSISTENCY The City Council hereby finds and determines thatthe General Plan, as amended, is internallyconsistent and shall remain internally consistent following amendments thereof by this Resolution. IV.ADOPTION OF GENERAL PLANAMENDMENTS In light of the findings above, the General Plan Amendmentprovisions arehereby approved andadopted in the form as presented in Exhibits Aattached heretoand on file in the City Clerk's Office. Presented by:Approved as to form by: Gary Halbert, P.E., AICPGlen R. Googins City ManagerCity Attorney ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 136 City of Chula Vista Staff Report File#:15-0539, Item#: 6. CONSIDERATIONOFTHEISSUANCEOFTAX-EXEMPTOBLIGATIONSWITHRESPECTTO PROPOSEDFINANCINGOFTHEDEVELOPMENTOFA123-UNITSENIORAND87-UNIT AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT IN THE MILLENIA COMMUNITY A.RESOLUTIONOFTHECITYCOUNCILOFTHECITYOFCHULAVISTAAPPROVINGTHE ISSUANCE,SALEANDDELIVERYOFMULTIFAMILYHOUSINGREVENUEBONDSOF THEHOUSINGAUTHORITYOFTHECITYOFCHULAVISTAFORMILLENIASENIOR AFFORDABLE APARTMENTS B.RESOLUTIONOFTHEHOUSINGAUTHORITYOFTHECITYOFCHULAVISTA REGARDINGITSINTENTIONTOISSUETAX-EXEMPTOBLIGATIONSFORAPROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF THE MILLENIA SENIOR AFFORDABLE APARTMENTS C.RESOLUTIONOFTHECITYCOUNCILOFTHECITYOFCHULAVISTAAPPROVINGTHE ISSUANCE,SALEANDDELIVERYOFMULTIFAMILYHOUSINGREVENUEBONDSOF THEHOUSINGAUTHORITYOFTHECITYOFCHULAVISTAFORMILLENIA AFFORDABLE APARTMENTS D.RESOLUTIONOFTHEHOUSINGAUTHORITYOFTHECITYOFCHULAVISTA REGARDINGITSINTENTIONTOISSUETAX-EXEMPTOBLIGATIONSFORAPROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF THE MILLENIA AFFORDABLE APARTMENTS RECOMMENDED ACTION Council conduct the public hearing, adopt resolutions A and C; Authority adopt resolutions B and D. SUMMARY OnDecember16,2014,theCityCouncilandtheCity’sHousingAuthorityapprovedtheuseof MultifamilyHousingBondsforthefinancingofthedevelopmentandconstructionofalowincome seniorandalowincomeaffordablehousingdevelopment,respectively,knownasMilleniaSeniorand MilleniaAffordableApartments(“Project”)byChelseaInvestmentCorporation(CIC).TheProjectis locatednearthesouthwestcornerofBirchRoadandEastlakeParkwaywithintheOtayRanch EasternUrbanCenter(EUCandalsoknownasMillenia)masterplannedcommunity.Inthepast ninemonths,constructionplansandcostestimateshaveadvanced,costsofconstructionhave City of Chula VistaPage 1 of 5Printed on 10/8/2015 powered by Legistar™ ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 137 File#:15-0539, Item#: 6. escalatedandlenderrequirementshavechanged.CICisproposing123unitsforseniorhousingand 87unitsforaffordablehousingandthattheHousingAuthorityoftheCityofChulaVistabethe conduitbondissuerforanaggregateamountof$41.1millionintaxexemptprivateactivitybondsfor multifamilyprojects,anincreaseofapproximately$3millioninbondingauthority.Thebondswillbe securedbytheprojectandwillnotconstitutealiabilitytoorobligationoftheCityofChulaVistaorits Housing Authority. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW TheDevelopmentServicesDirectorhasreviewedtheproposedprojectforcompliancewiththe CaliforniaEnvironmentalQualityAct(CEQA)andhasdeterminedthattheproposedprojectwas adequatelycoveredinpreviouslyadoptedFinalSecondTierEnvironmentalImpactReport,EIR07- 01. Therefore, no further CEQA review or documentation is necessary. BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION OnNovember20,2014,theHousingAdvisoryCommissionvotedtorecommendthedevelopmentof MilleniaSeniorandMilleniaApartmentsasaffordablerentalcommunitiesandtheissuanceoftax exempt private activity bonds for its financing. DISCUSSION OnDecember16,2014,theCityCouncilapprovedthroughResolutionNo.2014-256and2014-257 theissuance,saleanddeliveryofMultifamilyHousingRevenueBondsoftheHousingAuthorityof theCityofChulaVistafora126-unitmultifamilyrentalhousingprojectforseniorsandan84-unit multifamilyrentalhousingproject(“theProject”)withinOtayRanchEasternUrbanCenter(Exhibit1- LocatorMap).Additionally,theCity’sHousingAuthorityexpresseditsintentthroughHAResolution No.2014-006and2014-007toissueanaggregatetotalof$38,000,000intax-exemptobligationsfor the proposed Millenia developments. Inthepastninemonths,constructionplansandcostestimateshaveadvanced,costsofconstruction haveescalatedandlenderrequirementshavechanged.Additionally,inordertomeettheCity’s designandbuildingrequirements,bothdevelopmentshaveundergonesomereconfigurationthat has resulted in a change in the number of units to be constructed within the projects. Table 1: Proposed Change in DUs DescriptionUnits Proposed Dec 2014Oct 2015Difference Senior Housing126123-3 Family Housing8487+3 TOTAL2102100 Additionally,withincreasedcostsofmaterialsandlaborandrequirementsoflenderschanging,the developmentcostsoftheprojectandrequiredfinancinghasincreased.Affordablehousing developments,particularly,havealimitedabilitytogenerateincomebasedontherestrictedrental rates,affectingthedeveloper’sabilitytoqualifyforadditionalfinancing.Asdevelopersofaffordable housing,CIChaslimitedreservesandcashflowtoabsorbincreasedcosts.Therefore,CIChas City of Chula VistaPage 2 of 5Printed on 10/8/2015 powered by Legistar™ ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 138 File#:15-0539, Item#: 6. requestedthattheHousingAuthorityoftheCityofChulaVistaconsidera$3millionincreaseinthe maximumbondingauthoritytobeissuedfortheProject,foracombinedaggregateof$41.1million,to supportthemajorityoftheestimated$65.6million($398,572perseniorunitand$355,443perfamily unit)costofconstructingbothprojects.ThepermanentbondsandTaxCreditswouldcoverthe majority of the estimated cost. Table 2: Proposed Financing - Senior Development Sources DescriptionDec 2014Oct 2015Difference Multifamily Bonds21,019,000 21,700,000 681,000 Tax Credit Equity 6,917,008 9,505,169 2,588,161 Deferred & Contributed Developer Fee 1,250,0001,250,000 - Successor Agency Residual Receipts Loan 932,000 932,000 - City Residual Receipts Loan - City Fee Deferrals/Waivers 1,288,571 1,288,571 - TOTAL 31,406,579 34,675,740 3,269,161 Table 3: Proposed Financing - Affordable Development Sources DescriptionDec 2014Oct 2015Difference Multifamily Bonds15,053,913 19,400,000 4,346,087 Tax Credit Equity8,177,1027,294,158(882,944) Deferred & Contributed Developer Fee1,250,0001,250,000 - Successor Agency Residual Receipts Loan1,172,6601,172,660 - City Residual Receipts Loan895,340895,340 - City Fee Deferrals/Waivers911,429911,429 - TOTAL27,460,444 31,818,9274,358,483 TheApplicantiscurrentlypreparinganapplicationforboththeCaliforniaDebtLimitAllocation Committee(CDLAC)andtheCaliforniaTaxCreditAllocationCommitteeforbondsandTaxCreditsto substantiallyfinancetheProject.TheCDLACapplicationwillbesubmittedonOctober16,2015,with a decision made in December 2015. Atthistime,staffisrequestingthattheChulaVistaHousingAuthorityexpressitspreliminaryintentto applyforandissuebondsfortheProject.TheCityCouncilisalsoaskedtoholdapublichearingto considertheHousingAuthority’sissuanceoftaxexemptbondsforthefinancingoftheProjectat such time a bond allocation is received. TherequestedactionsarepreliminaryanddonotcommittheAuthoritytoissuethebonds.Such preliminaryactionsarerequirementsforapplicationtotheStatebondingauthoritywhichwillallow CICtoreceivereimbursementoutofbondproceedsforcostsitincursleadinguptotheactualsaleof City of Chula VistaPage 3 of 5Printed on 10/8/2015 powered by Legistar™ ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 139 File#:15-0539, Item#: 6. thebonds.IfsuccessfulinobtainingabondcommitmentfromCDLAC,thefinalapprovalofthe issuance of the bonds and the related bond documents will be presented to the Housing Authority. ResolutionspresentedfortheCityCouncil’sandHousingAuthority’sconsiderationhavebeen preparedbyStradlingYoccaCarlson&Rauth,servingasbondcounselfortheCityofChulaVista and its Housing Authority. Conclusion Staff recommends approval of the City and Housing Authority resolutions based upon the following: TheProjectoffersopportunitiestoprovidequalityaffordablehousingtoChulaVista’sworking familiesandinalocationwithinwalkingdistancetoneighborhoodservices,employment centers, and transportation links. ItiseffectiveinservingtheCity’shousingneedsandprioritiesasexpressedintheHousing Element of the General Plan and the HUD Consolidated Plan. TheApplicanthasaproventrackrecordinthedevelopmentandoperationofaffordable housingwithinChulaVistaandCaliforniaandsecuringthenecessarypublicandprivate financing. DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT StaffhasreviewedthepropertyholdingsoftheCityCouncilandHousingAuthorityandhasfoundno propertyholdingswithin500feetoftheboundariesofthepropertywhichisthesubjectofthisaction. Staffisnotindependentlyaware,andhasnotbeeninformedbyanyCityCouncilorHousing Authoritymember,ofanyotherfactthatmayconstituteabasisforadecisionmakerconflictof interest in this matter. LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS TheCity’sStrategicPlanhasfivemajorgoals:OperationalExcellence,EconomicVitality,Healthy Community,StrongandSecureNeighborhoodsandaConnectedCommunity.Thedevelopmentand provisionofqualityaffordablehousingforlowincomefamiliesandseniorswithinmasterplanned communitiessupportstheEconomicVitalitygoalsasitpromotesthedevelopmentofquality neighborhoodsthatprovideafullcomplementofusesandservicesinabalancedfashion.Withonly 16percentofthehousingwithintheareaseastofInterstate-805availableasmultifamilyhousing,the provisionof210rentalunitswithintheOtayRanchEUCcommunitywillexpandtheavailabilityof housingopportunitiesforalleconomicsegmentsofthecommunity.With57percentofChulaVista householdsearninglessthantheU.S.DepartmentofHousingandUrbanDevelopment’sarea medianincome,thedevelopmentofaffordablehousingaddressestheCity’sConnectedCommunity goals as it provides housing to meet residents’ needs and priorities. CURRENT YEAR FISCAL IMPACT Bondfinancingisaself-supportingprogramwiththeownerresponsibleforthepaymentofallcostsof issuanceandothercostsandrepaymentofthebonds.Allcostsrelatedtotheissuanceofthebonds willbepaidfrombondproceedsorprofits.Thebondswillbesecuredbytheprojectandwillnot constitute a liability to or obligation of the City of Chula Vista or Housing Authority. City of Chula VistaPage 4 of 5Printed on 10/8/2015 powered by Legistar™ ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 140 File#:15-0539, Item#: 6. TheCityofChulaVistaHousingAuthoritywillreceivecompensationforitsservicesinpreparingthe bond issuance by charging an origination fee of 1/8 of 1% of the bond loan, approximately $47,500. ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT Staffcostsassociatedwithmonitoringcomplianceoftheregulatoryrestrictionsandadministrationof theoutstandingbondswillbereimbursedfromanannualadministrativefeeofapproximately$45,000 (based upon 1/8 of 1% of the permanent bond loan) paid to the Housing Authority by the owner. ATTACHMENTS 1.Locator Map 2.Income Limits and Rents Staff Contact: Leilani Hines, Housing Manager City of Chula VistaPage 5 of 5Printed on 10/8/2015 powered by Legistar™ ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 141 RESOLUTION NO. __________ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE ISSUANCE, SALE AND DELIVERY OF MULTIFAMILY HOUSING REVENUE BONDS OF THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA FOR MILLENIA SENIOR AFFORDABLE APARTMENTS WHEREAS, the Housing Authority of the City of Chula Vista (the “Authority”) intends to issue not to exceed $21,700,000 aggregate principal amount of multifamily housing revenue bonds (the “Bonds”) to finance the acquisition and developmentof approximately123unitsof a multifamily rental housing projectfor seniors(the “Project”) located near the southwest corner of Birch Road and Eastlake Parkway within the Otay Ranch Millenia master planned community in the City of Chula Vista, California(the “City”); and , WHEREAS, the Project will be owned and/or operated by Chelsea Investment Corporation oranother limited partnership affiliated with Chelsea Investment Corporation (the “Owner”); and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), the Bonds are required to be approved, following a public hearing, by an elected representative of the governmental unit having jurisdiction over the area in which the Project is located; and WHEREAS, the Project is locatedwholly within the geographic jurisdiction of the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council (the “City Council”) is the elected legislative body of the City; and WHEREAS, the City caused a notice to appear in the Star News, which is a newspaper of general circulation in the City, on November 28, 2014 to the effect that a public hearing was held by the City Council on December 16, 2014, whereby the City Council authorized the issuance sale and delivery of the Bonds by the Authority in an aggregate amount of $16,981,000; and WHEREAS, since such time, construction plans and costs estimates for the Project have been advanced, construction costs have escalated and lender requirements have changed, the Project requires additional financing offered through the issuance of the Bonds, approximately $4,719,000. WHEREAS, the City has caused a notice to appear in the San Diego Union Tribune, which is a newspaper of general circulation in the City, on September 28, 2015 to the effect that a public hearing would be held by the City Council on October 13, 2015, regarding the issuance of the Bonds by the Authority; and WHEREAS, on October 13, 2015, the City Council held said public hearing, at which time an opportunity was provided to present arguments both for and against theissuance of the Bonds. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, as follows: ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 142 Resolution No. _________ Page 2 Section 1.The City Council does hereby find and declare that the above recitals are true and correct. Section 2.Pursuant to Section147(f) of the Code, the City Council hereby approves the issuance of the Bonds by the Authority in one or more series, in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $21,700,000and with a final maturity not later than 45 years from the date of issuance to finance the acquisition, constructionand equipping of the Project. It is the purpose and intent of the City Council that this Resolution constitutesapproval of the issuance of the Bonds by the applicable elected representative of the governmental unit having jurisdiction over the area in which the Project is located, in accordance with said Section147(f). Section 3.This Resolution shall take effect from and after its adoption. Presented byApproved as to form by Kelly BroughtonGlen R. Googins Director of Development ServicesCity Attorney ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 143 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTAREGARDING ITS INTENTION TO ISSUE TAX-EXEMPT OBLIGATIONSFOR A PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF THE MILLENIA AFFORDABLE APARTMENTS(“MILLENIA SENIOR APARTMENTS”) WHEREAS, the Housing Authority of the City of Chula Vista (the “Issuer”) desires to assist Chelsea Investment Corporation(the “Applicant”) in financing the costs of developinga multifamily rental housing project(“Millenia Senior Apartments”), as described Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein (the “Project”);and WHEREAS, the Issuer intends to assist in the financing of the developmentof the Project or portions of the Project with the proceeds of the sale of obligations the interest upon which is excluded from grossincome for federal income tax purposes (the “Obligations”), which Obligations are expected to be issued pursuant to Chapter 1of Part 2 of Division 24 the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; provided, however, that this Resolution shall not authorize the issuance of the Obligations and provided further that neither the faith and credit nor the taxing power of the Issuer shall be pledged to repay such Obligations if, and when, authorized; and WHEREAS, prior to the issuance of the Obligations the Applicant expects to incur certain expenditures with respect to the Project from its own available monies which expenditures it desires to have reimbursed from a portion of the proceeds of the sale of the Obligations if, and when, issued; and WHEREAS, Section 146 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) limits the amount of multifamily housing revenue bonds that may be issued in any calendar year by entities within a state and authorizes the governor or the legislature of a state to provide the method of allocation within the state; and WHEREAS, Chapter 11.8 of Division 1 of Title 2 of the Government Code of the State of California (the “Government Code”) governs the allocation of the state ceiling among governmental units in the State of California having the authority to issue multifamily housing revenue bonds; and WHEREAS, Section 8869.85 of the Government Code requires a local agency to file an application with the California Debt Limit Allocation Committee (“CDLAC”) prior to the issuance of multifamily housing revenue bonds; and WHEREAS, the Issuer desires to apply to CDLAC for an allocation for the Project. NOW, THEREFORE, THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, ORDER AND DETERMINE AS FOLLOWS: ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 144 Resolution No. _________ Page 2 SECTION 1.The Issuer has received an application for the financing of the Project on behalf of the Applicant (the “Application”). The Applicant will incur costs with respect to the Project prior to the issuance of the Obligations. The Issuer hereby states its intention and reasonably expects to reimburse to the Applicant for such costs with proceeds of the Obligations; provided, however, that nothing herein obligates the Issuer to issue the Obligations or provides the Applicant with any legal right to compel the issuance of the Obligations, which decision remains in the final discretion of the Issuer. Exhibit A describes the general character, type, purpose, and function of the Project. SECTION 2.The reasonably expected maximum principal amount of the Obligations is $21,700,000. This Resolution is being adopted no later than sixty (60) days after the date (the “Expenditure Date or Dates”) that the Applicant will expend moneys for the portion of Project costs to be reimbursed from proceeds of the Bonds. The expected date of issue of the Bonds is within eighteen (18) months of the later of the Expenditure Date or Dates and the first date the Project is placed in service and, in no event, later than three years after the Expenditure Date or Dates. SECTION 3.Proceeds of the Bonds to be used to reimburse for Project costs are not expected to be used directly or indirectly to pay debt service with respect to any obligation or to be held as a reasonably required reserve or replacement fund with respect to an obligation of the Issuer or any entity related in any manner to the Issuer, or to reimburse any expenditure that was originally paid with the proceeds of any obligation, or to replace funds that are or will be used in such manner. SECTION 4.This Resolution is consistent with the budgetary and financial circumstances of the Issuer, as of the date hereof. No monies from sources other than the Obligations are, or are reasonably expected to be reserved, allocated on a long-term basis, or otherwise set aside by the Issuer (or any related party) pursuant to their budget or financial policies with respect to the portion of the Project costs to be financed with the Obligations. This Board of Commissioners is not aware of any previous adoptionof official intents by the Issuer that have been made as a matter of course for the purpose of reimbursing expenditures relating to the Project and for which tax-exempt obligations have not been issued. SECTION 5.This Resolution is adopted as official action of the Issuer in order to comply with Treasury Regulation § 1.103-8(a)(5) and Treasury Regulation § 1.150-2 and any other regulations of the Internal Revenue Service relating to the qualification for reimbursement of expenditures incurred prior to thedate of issue of the Obligations, is part of the Issuer’s official proceedings, and will be available for inspection by the general public at the main administrative office of the Issuer. SECTION 6.The officers and employees of the Authority are hereby authorized and directed to apply to CDLAC for a portion of the private activity bond allocation set aside for the calendar year 2015for the Project in an aggregate amount not to exceed $21,700,000, to collect ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 145 Resolution No. _________ Page 3 from the Applicant and hold pursuant to CDLAC requirements the required CDLAC deposit for the requested allocation, and to certify to CDLAC that such amount has been placed on deposit in an account in a financial institution. Because the amount of private activity bond allocation is limited, such officers are also authorized to resubmit the application to CDLAC one or more times during the calendar years2015and 2016in the event the application is denied by CDLAC. SECTION 7.The officers and employees of the Issuer are hereby authorized and directed,jointly and severally, to take any actions and execute and deliver any and all documents which any of them deem necessary or advisable, with the advice of City Attorney, in order to effectuate the purposes of this Resolution, and such actions previously taken by such officers and employees are hereby ratified and confirmed; provided that the terms and conditions under which the Bonds are to be issued and sold must be approved by this Board in the manner provided by law prior to the sale of the Bonds. SECTION 8.All the recitals in this Resolution are true and correct. SECTION 9.This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. Presented byApproved as to form by Kelly BroughtonGlen R. Googins Director of Development ServicesCity Attorney ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 146 EXHIBIT A DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT A multifamily rental housing project of approximately 123units for low income senior households known as “Millenia Senior Apartments” and located near the southwest corner of Birch Road and Eastlake Parkway within the Otay Ranch Millenia master planned communityin the City of Chula Vista, California. ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 147 RESOLUTION NO. __________ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE ISSUANCE, SALE AND DELIVERY OF MULTIFAMILY HOUSING REVENUE BONDS OF THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA FOR MILLENIA AFFORDABLE APARTMENTS WHEREAS, the Housing Authority of the City of Chula Vista (the “Authority”) intends to issue not to exceed $19,400,000aggregate principal amount of multifamily housing revenue bonds (the “Bonds”) to finance the acquisition and developmentof approximately87units for amultifamily rental housing project(the “Project”) located near the southwest corner of Birch Road and Eastlake Parkway within the Otay Ranch Millenia master planned community in the City of Chula Vista, California(the “City”); and WHEREAS, the Project will be owned and/or operated by Chelsea Investment Corporation, or another limited partnership affiliated with Chelsea Investment Corporation(the “Owner”); and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), the Bonds are required to be approved, following a public hearing, by an elected representative of the governmental unit having jurisdiction over the area in which the Project is located; and WHEREAS, the Project is located wholly within the geographic jurisdiction of the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council (the “City Council”) is the elected legislative body of the City; and WHEREAS, the City caused a notice to appear in the Star News, which is a newspaper of general circulation in the City, on November 28, 2014 to the effect that a public hearing was held by the City Council on December 16, 2014, whereby the City Council authorized the issuance sale and delivery of the Bonds by the Authority in an aggregate amount of $16,981,000; and WHEREAS,since such time, construction plans and costs estimates for the Project have been advanced, construction costs have escalated and lender requirements have changed, the Project requires additional financing offered through the issuance of the Bonds, approximately $2,419,000. WHEREAS, the City has caused a notice to appear in the San Diego Union Tribune, which is a newspaper of general circulation in the City, on September 28,2015to the effect that a public hearing would be held by the City Council on October 13, 2015, regarding the issuance of the Bonds by the Authority; and WHEREAS, on October 13, 2015, the City Council held said public hearing, at which time an opportunity was provided to present arguments both for and against the issuance of the Bonds. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, as follows: ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 148 Resolution No. _________ Page 2 Section 1.The City Council does hereby find and declare that the above recitals are true and correct. Section 2.Pursuant to Section147(f) of the Code, the CityCouncil hereby approves the issuance of the Bonds by the Authority in one or more series, in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $19,400,000and with a final maturity not later than 45 years from the date of issuance to finance the acquisition, constructionand equipping of the Project. It is the purpose and intent of the City Council that this Resolution constitutesapproval of the issuance of the Bonds by the applicable elected representative of the governmental unit having jurisdiction over thearea in which the Project is located, in accordance with said Section147(f). Section 3.This Resolution shall take effect from and after its adoption. Presented byApproved as to form by Kelly BroughtonGlen R. Googins Director of Development ServicesCity Attorney ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 149 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTAREGARDING ITS INTENTION TO ISSUE TAX-EXEMPT OBLIGATIONSFOR A PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF THE MILLENIA AFFORDABLE APARTMENTS WHEREAS, the Housing Authority of the City of Chula Vista (the “Issuer”) desires to assist Chelsea Investment Corporation(the “Applicant”) in financing the costs of developinga multifamily rental housing project(“Millenia Affordable Apartments”), as described Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein(the “Project”);and WHEREAS, the Issuer intends to assist in the financing of the developmentof the Project or portions of the Project with the proceeds of the sale of obligations the interest upon which is excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes (the “Obligations”), which Obligations are expected to be issued pursuant to Chapter 1of Part 2 of Division 24 the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; provided, however, that this Resolution shall not authorize the issuance of the Obligations and provided further that neither the faith and credit nor the taxing power of the Issuer shall be pledged to repay such Obligations if, and when, authorized; and WHEREAS, prior to the issuance of the Obligations the Applicant expects to incur certain expenditures with respect to the Project from its own available monies which expenditures it desires to have reimbursed from a portion of the proceeds of the sale of the Obligations if, and when, issued; and WHEREAS, Section 146 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) limits the amount of multifamily housing revenue bonds that may be issued in any calendar year by entities within a state and authorizes the governor or the legislature of a state to provide the method of allocation within the state; and WHEREAS, Chapter 11.8 of Division 1 of Title 2 of the Government Code of the State of California (the “Government Code”) governs the allocation of the state ceiling among governmental units in the State of California having the authority to issue multifamily housing revenue bonds; and WHEREAS, Section 8869.85 of the Government Code requires a local agency to file an application with the California Debt Limit Allocation Committee (“CDLAC”) prior to the issuance of multifamily housing revenue bonds; and WHEREAS, the Issuer desires to apply to CDLAC for an allocation for the Project. NOW, THEREFORE, THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, ORDER AND DETERMINE AS FOLLOWS: ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 150 Resolution No. _________ Page 2 SECTION 1.The Issuer has received an application for the financing of the Project on behalf of the Applicant (the “Application”). The Applicant will incur costs with respect to the Project prior to the issuance of the Obligations. The Issuer hereby states its intention and reasonably expects to reimburse to the Applicant for such costs with proceeds of the Obligations; provided, however, that nothing herein obligates the Issuer to issue the Obligations or provides the Applicant with any legal right to compelthe issuance of the Obligations, which decision remains in the final discretion of the Issuer. Exhibit A describes the general character, type, purpose, and function of the Project. SECTION 2.The reasonably expected maximum principal amount of the Obligations is $19,400,000. This Resolution is being adopted no later than sixty (60) days after the date (the “Expenditure Date or Dates”) that the Applicant will expend moneys for the portion of Project costs to be reimbursed from proceeds of the Bonds. The expected date of issue of the Bonds is within eighteen (18) months of the later of the Expenditure Date or Dates and the first date the Project is placed in service and, in no event, later than three years after the Expenditure Date or Dates. SECTION 3.Proceeds of the Bonds to be used to reimburse for Project costs are not expected to be used directly or indirectly to pay debt service with respect to any obligation or to be held as a reasonably required reserve or replacement fund with respect to an obligation of the Issuer or any entity related in any manner to the Issuer, or to reimburse any expenditure that was originally paid with the proceeds of any obligation, or to replace funds that are or will be used in such manner. SECTION 4.This Resolution is consistent with the budgetary and financial circumstances of the Issuer, as of the date hereof. No monies from sources other than the Obligations are, or are reasonably expected to be reserved, allocated on a long-term basis, or otherwise set aside by the Issuer (or any related party) pursuant to their budget or financial policies with respect to the portion of the Project costs to be financed with the Obligations. This Board of Commissioners is not aware of any previous adoption of official intents by theIssuer that have been made as a matter of course for the purpose of reimbursing expenditures relating to the Project and for which tax-exempt obligations have not been issued. SECTION 5.This Resolution is adopted as official action of the Issuer in orderto comply with Treasury Regulation § 1.103-8(a)(5) and Treasury Regulation § 1.150-2 and any other regulations of the Internal Revenue Service relating to the qualification for reimbursement of expenditures incurred prior to the date of issue of the Obligations, is part of the Issuer’s official proceedings, and will be available for inspection by the general public at the main administrative office of the Issuer. SECTION 6.The officers and employees of the Authority are hereby authorized and directed to apply to CDLAC for a portion of the private activity bond allocation set aside for the calendar year 2015for the Project in an aggregate amount not to exceed $19,400,000, to collect ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 151 Resolution No. _________ Page 3 from the Applicant and hold pursuant to CDLAC requirements the required CDLAC deposit for the requested allocation, and to certify to CDLAC that such amount has been placed on deposit in an account in a financial institution. Because the amount of private activity bond allocation is limited, such officers are also authorized toresubmit the application to CDLAC one or more times during the calendar years2015and 2016in the event the application is denied by CDLAC. SECTION 7.The officers and employees of the Issuer are hereby authorized and directed, jointly and severally, to take any actions and execute and deliver any and all documents which any of them deem necessary or advisable, with the advice of City Attorney, in order to effectuate the purposes of this Resolution, and such actions previously taken by such officers and employees are hereby ratified and confirmed; provided that the terms and conditions under which the Bonds are to be issued and sold must be approved by this Board in the manner provided by law prior to the sale of the Bonds. SECTION 8.All the recitals in this Resolution are true and correct. SECTION 9.This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. Presented byApproved as to form by Kelly BroughtonGlen R. Googins Director of Development ServicesCity Attorney ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 152 EXHIBIT A DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT A multifamily rental housing project of approximately 87units known as “Millenia Apartments” and located near the southwest corner of Birch Road and Eastlake Parkway within the Otay Ranch Millenia master plannedcommunityin the City of Chula Vista, California. ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 153 EXHIBIT 1 MILLENIA AFFORDABLE HOUSING ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 154 EXHIBIT 2 MILLENIA AFFORDABLE HOUSING Income & Rent Restrictions Target Income Group Unit No. of Units Annual Proposed Description % of AMI IncomeRents Seniors 1 Bd/1 Ba1150%$33,050$ 857 1 Bd/1 Ba8860%$38,900$ 709 2 Bd/1 Ba250%$36,450$1,027 2 Bd/1 Ba2160%$43,750$ 849 MGR1N/AN/AN/A Subtotal123 Family 1 Bd/1 Ba1350%$33,050$ 857 1 Bd/1 Ba1460%$ 38,900$ 709 2 Bd/1 Ba650%$ 36,450$1,027 2 Bd/1 Ba2760%$ 43,750$ 849 3 Bd/2 Ba350%$40,500$ 978 3 Bd/2 Ba1960%$48,600$1,183 MGR2N/AN/AN/A Subtotal87 Total 210 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 155 City of Chula Vista Staff Report File#:15-0508, Item#: 7. PRESENTATIONOFAWATERCONSERVATIONAPPROACHFORCITYHALLGROUNDSAND LANDSCAPE AREAS (REFERENCE CITY COUNCIL DISCUSSION OF 05/12/15) RECOMMENDED ACTION Council accept the report and provide comments. SUMMARY In January 2015, Governor Brown declared a state of emergency due to the current drought conditions. Under the executive order issued by the Governor this past April, local governments were offered incentives to replace lawn with drought tolerant landscapes and prohibited from irrigating ornamental grasses in street medians among other requirements. In response, staff has been working to take advantage of the incentives and to begin to develop approaches to these prohibitions and other regulations promulgated from this executive order. On May 12, 2015, City Council discussed ideas for how to approach these drought conditions with respect to the grounds around City Hall. Staff was directed to bring back options for City Council to consider. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Development Services Director has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the project qualifies for a Class 4 Categorical Exemption pursuant to Section 15304(b) (Minor Alterations to Land) of the State CEQA Guidelines. Consistent with Section 15304(b), the project would be gardening or landscaping; including the replacement of existing conventional landscaping with water efficient or fire resistant landscaping. BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Not Applicable DISCUSSION Staff has held meetings to discuss our drought response and has consulted with experts in the field to consider a variety of ideas. In addition staff made application to the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California’s Turf Removal Program for replacement of turf in a number of areas around the City including around City Hall. On July 15, 2015 our application was approved for removal of turf at the new incentive rate of $2 per square foot for the first 3,000 square feet and $1 per square foot for all areas exceeding the 3,000 square feet, up to a total maximum rebate of $50,000. Staff will share the results of these discussions and ideas to approach water conservation with Council at the hearing. Nick DeLorenzo of DeLorenzo International has been invited by staff to also present information for consideration by City Council based upon their years of experience in City of Chula VistaPage 1 of 2Printed on 10/8/2015 powered by Legistar™ ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 156 File#:15-0508, Item#: 7. establishing, converting and maintaining water conserving landscapes. DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT Staff has determined that the action contemplated by this item is ministerial, secretarial, manual, or clerical in nature and, as such, does not require City Council members to make or participate in making a governmental decision, pursuant to California Code of Regulations Title 2, section 18704.4 (a)(1). Consequently, this item does not present a conflict of interest under the Political Reform Act (Cal. Gov't Code § 87100, et seq.). Staff is not independently aware, and has not been informed by any City Council member, of any other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter. LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS The City’s Strategic Plan has five major goals: Operational Excellence, Economic Vitality, Healthy Community, Strong and Secure Neighborhoods and a Connected Community. Converting the City landscape areas to more water conserving landscapes contributes to operational excellence by improving service delivery and to a healthy community by promoting sustainability and conservation. CURRENT YEAR FISCAL IMPACT Funds for the conversion of the City Hall complex will come from the current FY Public Works budget. A future action item to appropriate the turf removal rebate will be brought to City Council after it is received from the San Diego County Water Authority. The remaining costs of the conversion after the rebate will come from the general fund. ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT Depending upon the turf replacement strategy implemented there should be a savings to the general fund by reduction of irrigation water consumed and those related costs. Staff Contact: Kelly Broughton, Director, Development Services (619) 691-5233 City of Chula VistaPage 2 of 2Printed on 10/8/2015 powered by Legistar™ ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 157 City of Chula Vista Staff Report File#:15-0545, Item#: 8. PRESENTATION OF A REPORT ON THE STATUS OF THE ONGOING ASSET MANAGEMENT PROGRAM AND FINANCING STUDY RECOMMENDED ACTION Council hear the report. SUMMARY The City of Chula Vista is progressing on developing and implementing its Asset Management Program (AMP) to operate and maintain the City’s natural and built environment. TBWB, a Consultant firm, was engaged to study potential financing solutions toward sustaining the program. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the proposed activity for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and has determined that acceptance by the City Council of the Report on the AMP and Financing Study is not a “Project” as defined under Section 15378(b)(5) of the State CEQA Guidelines because accepting the Report is an administrative activity of the government; therefore, pursuant to Section 15060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines the activity is not subject to CEQA. Thus, no environmental review is necessary. BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Not applicable DISCUSSION Several years ago, the City initiated efforts to develop a comprehensive Asset Management Program (AMP) to more effectively and transparently operate and maintain the City owned assets. City staff has been reporting progress to Council on a regular basis including the annual Infrastructure Workshops. This report highlights progress since the last workshop held April 2, 2015 and includes results from a survey (Attachment) exploring the feasibility of potential revenue mechanisms for sustaining the AMP. The financing study was prepared by consultants, TBWB/True North. Results of the recent survey and discussion of next steps will be presented to Council. DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT City of Chula VistaPage 1 of 2Printed on 10/8/2015 powered by Legistar™ ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 158 File#:15-0545, Item#: 8. Staff has reviewed the decision contemplated by this action and has determined that it is not site specific and consequently, the 500-foot rule found in California Code of Regulations section 18704.2 (a)(1), is not applicable to this decision. Staff is not independently aware, and has not been informed by any City Council member, of any other fact that may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter. LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS The City’s Strategic Plan has five major goals: Operational Excellence, Economic Vitality, Healthy Community, Strong and Secure Neighborhoods and a Connected Community. Implementation of the Asset Management Program, including a funding mechanism, will advance all of these goals by realizing efficient, transparent operations with safe and reliable stewardship of the natural and built environments to ensure a sustainable quality of life expect by the community. CURRENT YEAR FISCAL IMPACT The cost to perform current work on the AMP and the Financing Study are included in the 2015/2016 fiscal year budget and there is no additional fiscal impact. ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT The ongoing fiscal impact is unknown at this time. The ongoing fiscal impacts will be evaluated as future projects resulting from the Asset Management Study are brought forward for consideration and approval. ATTACHMENTS 1.Revenue Measure Feasibility Study Staff Contact: Richard A. Hopkins, Director of Public Works City of Chula VistaPage 2 of 2Printed on 10/8/2015 powered by Legistar™ ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 159 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 160 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 161 T C ABLEOFONTENTS Table of Contents. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .i List of Tables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .iii List of Figures. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .iv Introduction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Motivation for Research . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Testing Two Alternatives: Sales Tax & Bond . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Overview of Methodology. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Organization of Report. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Disclaimer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 About True North. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Just the Facts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Importance of Issues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Initial Ballot Tests. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Tax Threshold . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Programs & Projects. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Positive Arguments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Interim Ballot Tests . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Negative Arguments. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Final Ballot Tests . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Conclusions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Importance of Issues. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Question 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Neighborhood Issues. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Question 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Initial Ballot Tests . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Support by Measure Type. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Question 3 (Sales Tax) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Question 5 (Bond). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Support by Subgroups . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Reasons for Opposing Measure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 Question 4/6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 Tax Threshold. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 Sales Tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 Question 7 (Sales Tax) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 Bond . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 Question 8 (Bond). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Question 9 (Bond). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 Programs & Projects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 Question 10. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 Program & Project Ratings by Subgroup. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 Positive Arguments. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 Question 11. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 Positive Arguments by Initial Support. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 Interim Ballot Tests. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 Question 12 (Sales Tax) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 Question 13 (Bond). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 Support by Subgroups . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 Negative Arguments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 Question 14. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 Negative Arguments by Initial Support . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 i City of Chula VistaTrue North Research, Inc. © 2015 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 162 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Final Ballot Tests . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 Question 15 (Sales Tax) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 Question 16 (Bond). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 Change in Support. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 Background & Demographics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 Methodology. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 Questionnaire Development. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 Programming, Translation & Pre-Test. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 Split-Sample Method. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 Statistical Margin of Error. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 Data Collection. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 Data Processing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 Rounding. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 Questionnaire & Toplines. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 ii City of Chula VistaTrue North Research, Inc. © 2015 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 163 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . L T ISTOFABLES Table1Demographic Breakdown of Support at Initial Ballot Test: Sales Tax . . . . . . . . . . . 15 Table2Demographic Breakdown of Support at Initial Ballot Test: Bond. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 Table3Top Programs & Projects by Position at Initial Ballot Test: Sales Tax . . . . . . . . . . . 23 Table4Top Programs & Projects by Position at Initial Ballot Test: Bond. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 Table5Top Positive Arguments by Position at Initial Ballot Test: Sales Tax. . . . . . . . . . . . 26 Table6Top Positive Arguments by Position at Initial Ballot Test: Bond . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 Table7Demographic Breakdown of Support at Interim Ballot Test: Sales Tax . . . . . . . . . . 28 Table8Demographic Breakdown of Support at Interim Ballot Test: Bond . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 Table9Negative Arguments by Position at Initial Ballot Test: Sales Tax. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 Table10Negative Arguments by Position at Initial Ballot Test: Bond. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 Table11Demographic Breakdown of Support at Final Ballot Test: Sales Tax. . . . . . . . . . . . 34 Table12Demographic Breakdown of Support at Final Ballot Test: Bond . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 Table13Movement Between Initial & Final Ballot Tests: Sales Tax. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 Table14Movement Between Initial & Final Ballot Tests: Bond . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 Table15Demographics of Samples. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 iii City of Chula VistaTrue North Research, Inc. © 2015 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 164 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . L F ISTOFIGURES Figure1Importance of Issues. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Figure2Biggest Issue Facing Neighborhood. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Figure3Initial Ballot Test by Survey Version: Sales Tax & Bond . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Figure4Reasons For Not Supporting Measure: Sales Tax. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 Figure5Reasons For Not Supporting Measure: Bond . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 Figure6Tax Threshold: Sales Tax, One-Quarter Cent. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 Figure7Tax Threshold: Bond. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Figure8Tax Threshold: Bond, Average of $186 Per Year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 Figure9Programs & Projects: Sales Tax. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 Figure10Programs & Projects: Bond . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 Figure11Positive Arguments: Sales Tax. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 Figure12Positive Arguments: Bond. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 Figure13Interim Ballot Test by Survey Version: Sales Tax & Bond . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 Figure14Negative Arguments: Sales Tax. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 Figure15Negative Arguments: Bond . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 Figure16Final Ballot Test by Survey Version: Sales Tax & Bond . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 Figure17Maximum Margin of Error Due to Sampling. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 iv City of Chula VistaTrue North Research, Inc. © 2015 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 165 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I NTRODUCTION The City of Chula Vista is located at the center of one of the richest cultural, economic and envi- ronmentally diverse zones in the United States. It is the second-largest city in San Diego County 1 with an estimated population of 257,989 residents. Chula Vista boasts more than 50 square miles of coastal landscape, canyons, rolling hills, mountains, and a variety of natural resources. The CityÔs dedicated team of full-time and part-time employees provides a full suite of services to residents and local businesses. As Chula Vista has grown, so too have the demands placed upon its facilities, services, and infra- structure. Unfortunately, the CityÔs revenue streams have not kept pace with the growing demands and escalating costs, leading to shortfalls in the funding required to adequately main- tain and manage its various infrastructure systemsÐincluding streets and roads, storm drains, water and wastewater systems, parks, recreation facilities, libraries, as well as public safety facil- ities and equipment. Despite being efficient, fiscally responsible, and making significant budget cuts in recent years in response to the economic downturn and State raids on the CityÔs finances, the City of Chula VistaÔs priority infrastructure needs far outstrip the funding available to 2 address them appropriately. MOTIVATION FOR RESEARCH The primary purpose of this study was to produce an unbiased, statistically reliable evaluation of votersÔ interest in supporting a sales tax or general obligation bond to fund priority repairs and improvements to the CityÔs infrastructure systems. Additionally, should the City decide to move forward with a revenue measure, the survey data provide guidance as to how to structure a measure so that it is consistent with the community's priorities and expressed needs. Specifically, the study was designed to: ¤Gauge current, baseline support for a local revenue measure (sales tax or bond) to fund repairs and improvements to City infrastructure ¤Identify the tax rate that the community is willing to support ¤Identify the types of repairs and improvements that voters are most interested in funding, should the measure pass ¤Expose voters to arguments in favor of, and against, the proposed measure to gauge how information affects support for the measure, and ¤Estimate support for the measure once voters are presented with the types of information they will likely be exposed to during the election cycle. It is important to note at the outset that votersÔ opinions about tax measures are often some- what fluid, especially when the amount of information they initially have about a measure is lim- ited. How voters think and feel about a measure today may not be the same way they think and feel once they have had a chance to hear more information about the measure during the elec- tion cycle. Accordingly, to accurately assess the feasibility of establishing a revenue measure to fund infrastructure repairs and improvements, it was important that in addition to measuring current opinions about the measure, the survey expose respondents to the types of information voters are likely to encounter during an election cycleÐincluding arguments in favor and 1.Source: California Department of Finance estimate, January 2015. 2.For more information on the CityÔs Asset Management Program and the state of the CityÔs infrastructure sys- tems, go to www.chulavista.gov/infrastructure. 1 City of Chula VistaTrue North Research, Inc. © 2015 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 166 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . opposed to the measureÐand gauge how this information ultimately impacts their voting deci- sion. TESTING TWO ALTERNATIVES: SALES TAX & BOND One objective of this study was to determine how support for a local measure may vary depending on the type of financial mechanism employed: sales tax or general obligation bond. To reliably estimate support for both types of measures, a split-sample methodology was employed such that 400 voters were administered a survey that focused on a sales tax, whereas a separate 400 voters were asked questions regarding a potential bond measure. All 800 respondents received general questions that applied to both types of measures. OVERVIEW OF METHODOLOGY For a full discussion of the research methods and tech- niques used in this study, turn to Methodology on page 38. In brief, the survey was administered by telephone to a random sample of 800 registered voters in the City of Chula Vista who are likely to participate in the November 2016 election. Interviews were conducted between July 27 and August 5, 2015, and the average interview lasted 19 minutes. ORGANIZATION OF REPORT This report is designed to meet the needs of readers who prefer a summary of the findings as well as those who are interested in the details of the results. For those who seek an overview of the findings, the sections titled Just the Facts and Conclusions are for you. They provide a summary of the most important factual findings of the surveys in bul- let-point format and a discussion of their implications. For the interested reader, this section is followed by a more detailed question-by-question discussion of the results from the surveys by topic area (see Table of Contents), as well as a description of the methodology employed for col- lecting and analyzing the data. And, for the truly ambitious reader, the questionnaire used for the interviews is contained at the back of this report (see Questionnaire & Toplines on page 41) and a complete set of crosstabulations for the survey results are contained in Appendix A. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS True North thanks the City of Chula Vista for the opportunity to assist the city in this important effort. A special thanks also to city staff, as well as Jared Boigon of TBWB, for providing their valuable input during the design stage of this study. Their collective expertise, local knowledge, and insight improved the overall quality of the research presented here. DISCLAIMER The statements and conclusions in this report are those of the authors (Dr. Timothy McLarney and Richard Sarles) at True North Research, Inc. and not necessarily those of the City of Chula Vista. Any errors and omissions are the responsibility of the authors. ABOUT TRUE NORTH True North is a full-service survey research firm that is dedicated to providing public agencies with a clear understanding of the values, perceptions, priorities and concerns of their residents and customers. Through designing and implementing scientific sur- veys, focus groups and one-on-one interviews, as well as expert interpretation of the findings, True North helps its clients to move with confidence when making strategic decisions in a variety of areasÐsuch as planning, policy evaluation, performance management, organizational devel- opment, establishing fiscal priorities, and developing effective public information campaigns. 2 City of Chula VistaTrue North Research, Inc. © 2015 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 167 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . During their careers, Dr. McLarney and Mr. Sarles have designed and conducted over 900 survey research studies for public agencies, including more than 300 revenue measure feasibility stud- ies. Of the measures that have gone to ballot based on Dr. McLarneyÔs recommendation, more than 93% have been successful. In total, the research that Dr. McLarney has conducted has led to over $24 billion in successful local revenue measures. 3 City of Chula VistaTrue North Research, Inc. © 2015 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 168 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . J F USTTHEACTS The following section is an outline of the main factual findings from the survey. For the readerÔs convenience, we have organized the findings according to the section titles used in the body of this report. Thus, if you would like to learn more about a particular finding, simply turn to the appropriate report section. IMPORTANCE OF ISSUES ¤When presented with a list of nine specific issues and asked to rate the importance of each, protecting the supply of water received the highest percentage of respondents indicating that the issue was either extremely or very important (93%), followed by creating jobs and improving the local economy (91%), and maintaining the quality of education in local schools (89%). ¤Given the purpose of this study, it is instructive to note that preventing local tax increases (68%) was rated lower in importance than maintaining the quality of city services, facilities and infrastructure (77%). ¤When asked to identify the biggest problem facing their neighborhood that they would like the City to address, just over one-fifth of respondents were either unsure of any issues fac- ing their neighborhood (9%) or indicated that there were no issues theyÔd like the City to address (12%). Regarding specific suggestions, improving public safety (17%) and improving and repairing streets and roads (16%) were the top mentions, followed by addressing drought and water issues (9%), reducing traffic congestion (8%), improving the local econ- omy and job opportunities (8%), and improving education (7%). INITIAL BALLOT TESTS ¤Sales Tax Version: With only the information provided in the ballot language, 69% of voters initially indicated they would support enacting a one-half-cent sales tax in order to fund essential projects and services, including repairing and maintaining city streets, fixing pot- holes, sidewalks and storm drains; upgrading aging police, fire and 9-1-1 emergency response facilities, equipment and communications to ensure reliable response; maintaining parks, recreation and library facilities and services; and making water conservation and other infrastructure improvements. Approximately 23% stated that they would oppose the sales tax measure at this point in the survey, whereas 7% were unsure or unwilling to share their vote choice. ¤Those who opposed the sales tax measure at the Initial Ballot Test (or were unsure) were most likely to cite a perception that taxes are already too high (52%), concern that the money would be mismanaged/misspent (31%), and the belief that the measure would be ineffective and that no improvements would be made (12%) as the reasons for their position. ¤Bond Version: With only the information provided in the ballot language, 71% of respon- dents indicated that they would definitely or probably support a $200 million bond to pro- vide adequate funding for essential city projects and improvements, including repairing and maintaining city streets, fixing potholes, sidewalks and storm drains; upgrading aging police, fire and 9-1-1 emergency response facilities, equipment and communications to ensure reliable response; maintaining parks, recreation and library facilities; and making water conservation and other infrastructure improvements. Approximately 22% stated that they would oppose the bond measure at this point in the survey, whereas 7% were unsure or unwilling to share their vote choice. 4 City of Chula VistaTrue North Research, Inc. © 2015 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 169 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¤Those who opposed the bond measure at the Initial Ballot Test (or were unsure) were most likely to cite the perception that taxes are already too high (36%), concerns that the money would be mismanaged/misspent (25%), and a need for more information (24%) as the rea- sons for their position. TAX THRESHOLD ¤Sales Tax Version: Reducing the proposed tax rate to one-quarter percent did not increase overall support for the sales tax measure. In fact, a small percentage of voters (2%) who said they would probably support the measure at one-half cent indicated they would probably not support the measure at one-quarter cent or indicated they were unsure of how they would vote. This shift in support resulted in reducing overall support for the sale tax mea- sure to 67% at this point in the survey. ¤Bond Version: Support for the bond measure varied according to the proposed tax rate. At the highest tax rate tested ($57 per $100,000 of assessed valuation), just 34% of voters indi- cated that they would support the bond. Incremental reductions in the tax rate resulted in incremental increases in support for the measure, with 50% of voters indicating that they would support the bond at the lowest tax rate tested ($28 per $100,000 of assessed valua- tion). ¤Voters responded more positively when the cost of the bond measure was expressed as an annual total for the median home owner when compared with a rate per $100,000 of assessed valuation. When the highest tax rate ($57 per $100,000 of assessed valuation) was converted to an annual total of $186 for the typical residential property owner, support for the bond increased from 34% to 43%. PROGRAMS & PROJECTS ¤Sales Tax Version: Of the projects and programs that could be funded by a sales tax, voters most strongly favored paving, maintaining and repairing city streets and fixing potholes (83% strongly or somewhat favor), followed by repairing or replacing failing storm drain pipes that can create sink holes in city streets (83%), repairing broken sidewalks, curbs and gutters (81%), and upgrading aging police, fire and 9-1-1 emergency response facilities, equipment and communications to ensure reliable response (81%). ¤Bond Version: Of the projects that could be funded by a bond, voters most strongly favored paving, maintaining, and repairing city streets and fixing potholes (80% strongly or some- what favor), upgrading the City's irrigation and drainage systems to conserve drinking water (79%), retrofitting storm drains to capture trash and reduce water pollution (77%), and main- taining parks and recreation facilities including courts, fields, pools and playgrounds (76%). POSITIVE ARGUMENTS When presented with arguments in favor of the measures, voters found the following arguments to be the most persuasive: Sales Tax Version ¤When you have an emergency, you need help fast. Minutes count in these situations. This measure will ensure that our police and firefighters have the vehicles and life-saving equip- ment they need to respond quickly to 9-1-1 emergencies. 5 City of Chula VistaTrue North Research, Inc. © 2015 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 170 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ¤Much of the City's storm drain system is more than 50 years old. We need to start replacing and repairing the system before pipes begin collapsing and create sink holes, flooding, pol- lution, and millions of dollars in property damage. ¤By keeping our city safe, clean and well-maintained, this measure will help protect our qual- ity of life and our property values. Bond Version ¤When you have an emergency, you need help fast. Minutes count in these situations. This measure will ensure that our police and firefighters have the vehicles and life-saving equip- ment they need to respond quickly to 9-1-1 emergencies. ¤Much of the City's storm drain system is more than 50 years old. We need to start replacing and repairing the system before pipes begin collapsing and create sink holes, flooding, pol- lution, and millions of dollars in property damage. ¤By keeping our city safe, clean and well-maintained, this measure will help protect our qual- ity of life and our property values. INTERIM BALLOT TESTS ¤Sales Tax Version: After being presented with programs and projects that could be funded as well as arguments in favor of the sales tax measure, overall support for the sales tax measure remained steady at 69%, with 27% of respondents opposed to the measure and an additional 4% unsure or unwilling to state their vote choice. ¤Bond Version: After being presented with possible tax rates, programs and projects that could be funded, as well as arguments in favor of the bond measure, overall support for the bond declined 7 percentage points from the Initial Ballot Test to 64%, with 27% of respon- dents opposed to the measure, and 8% unsure or unwilling to state their vote choice. NEGATIVE ARGUMENTS Of the arguments in opposition to the measures, voters found the following arguments to be the most persuasive: Sales Tax Version ¤This tax will hurt seniors and others on fixed-incomes. ¤People are having a hard time making ends meet with high unemployment and a sluggish economy. Now is NOT the time to be raising taxes. ¤We can't trust the City with this tax. They will mismanage the money or spend it on their own pet projects. Bond Version ¤This tax will hurt seniors and others on fixed-incomes. ¤Raising taxes will hurt our local businesses and our local economy. ¤Taxpayers will be paying for this bond for the next 30 years. That is too much debt. 6 City of Chula VistaTrue North Research, Inc. © 2015 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 171 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . FINAL BALLOT TESTS ¤Sales Tax Version: After providing respondents with the wording of the proposed measure, possible tax rates, programs and projects that could be funded by the measure, as well as arguments in favor and against the proposal, support for the sales tax measure was found among 67% of voters, with 28% opposed to the measure and 4% unsure or unwilling to state their vote choice. ¤Bond Version: After providing respondents with the wording of the proposed measure, pos- sible tax rates, programs and projects that could be funded by the measure, as well as argu- ments in favor and against the proposal, support for the bond dipped again to 60%, with 34% opposed to the measure and 7% unsure or unwilling to state their vote choice. 7 City of Chula VistaTrue North Research, Inc. © 2015 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 172 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C ONCLUSIONS The bulk of this report is devoted to conveying the details of the study findings. In this section, however, we attempt to Ósee the forest through the treesÔ and note how the collective results of the survey answer the key questions that motivated the research. The following conclusions are based on True NorthÔs and TBWBÔs interpretations of the survey results and the firmsÔ collective experience conducting revenue measure studies for public agencies throughout the State. Yes. Chula Vista voters have a high opinion of the quality of life in the Is it feasible to place a local revenue measure 3 city as well as the CityÔs performance in providing municipal services, on the ballot in 2016? and they view maintaining the quality of city facilities, services and infra- structure as being among the most important issues facing the city. These sentiments combine to create strong natural support for a reve- nue measure to fund essential projects and services, including repairing and maintaining city streets, fixing potholes, sidewalks and storm drains; upgrading aging police, fire and 9-1-1 emergency response facili- ties, equipment and communications to ensure reliable response; main- taining parks, recreation and library facilities and services; and making water conservation and other infrastructure improvements. The results of this feasibility study suggest that, if crafted appropriately and combined with an effective public education effort, a revenue mea- sure has a good chance of being supported by the necessary proportion of voters in 2016. Having stated that a measure is feasible, itÔs also important to note that this conclusion comes with several qualifications and conditions. Indeed, although the results are promising, all tax measures must overcome challenges prior to being successful. The proposed measure is no excep- tion. The following paragraphs discuss some of the challenges and the next steps that True North and TBWB recommend. One of the key objectives of this study was to determine how support for Which funding mecha- nism should be selected a revenue measure to ensure adequate funding for infrastructure repairs for the revenue mea- and improvements may vary depending on the type of funding mecha- sure? nism employed: sales tax or general obligation bond. Although both mechanisms initially found two-thirds support, the study clearly indi- cates that Chula Vista voters prefer a sales tax measure to a bond. Sup- port for a half-cent sales tax was steady throughout the survey, ranging between 67% and 69% depending on the context. Although support for the bond at the Initial Ballot Test was high (71%), voter sensitivity to the tax rates that could be associated with a bond, as well as opposition arguments, resulted in a 12% reduction in support for the bond over the course of the interview. Accordingly, True North and TBWB recommend that the City pursue a sales tax measure. 3.Based on the 2014 Community Survey conducted by True North Research for the City of Chula Vista. 8 City of Chula VistaTrue North Research, Inc. © 2015 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 173 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Naturally, the willingness of voters to support a specific revenue mea- What should the tax rate be for the measure? sure is contingentÐin partÐon the tax rate associated with a measure. The higher the rate, all other things being equal, the lower the level of aggregate support that can be expected. It is critical that the rate be set at a level that the necessary proportion of voters view as affordable. Assuming the City selects a sales tax as the appropriate mechanism, the survey results indicate that a half-percent rate is appropriate. Chula Vista voters expressed strong support for a sales tax at that rate, and a reduc- tion in the rate to one-quarter percent did not improve support. As noted above, True North and TBWB do not recommend that the City pursue a bond measure due to insufficient support for that option. Even at the lowest tax rate tested ($28 per $100,000 of assessed valuation), support for the bond was well below the two-thirds threshold required for passage. California law allows the City of Chula Vista the option of pursuing a Should the City select a special tax or a general sales tax as a special tax or as a general tax. A special tax dedicates tax option? funds to specific purposes and requires two-thirds supermajority sup- port for passage. A general tax, meanwhile, is Ñany tax imposed for gen- 4 eral governmental purposesÒ and is distinguished from a special tax in that the funds raised by a general tax are not earmarked for a specific purpose(s). Thus, a general tax provides a city with a great deal of flexi- bility with respect to what is funded by the measure on a year-to-year basis. Another key difference is that a general tax requires a simple majority (50% +1) for passage, rather than the higher two-thirds thresh- old required for a special tax. Choosing between a special tax and a general tax involves balancing trade-offs. A special tax guarantees funding for specific projects, but has less flexibility and involves a substantially higher risk of failure at the ballot box due to the much higher bar (two-thirds) for success. A general tax has greater flexibility in how the funds can be spent (which can be a pro or con depending on the audience), and has much less risk of failure due to the lower threshold for success (simple majority). True North and TBWB will consult with the City of Chula Vista in the coming months to identify the option that is best for the City. As noted in the body of this report, individualsÔ opinions about revenue How might a public information campaign measures are often not rigid, especially when the amount of information affect support for the presented to the public on a measure has been limited. Thus, in addition proposed measure? to measuring current support for the measures, one of the goals of this study was to explore how the introduction of additional information 4.Section 1, Article XIIIC, California Constitution. 9 City of Chula VistaTrue North Research, Inc. © 2015 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 174 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . about the measures may affect votersÔ opinions about the sales tax and bond options. It is clear from the survey results that votersÔ opinions about the pro- posed measures are somewhat sensitive to the natureÐand amountÐof information that they have about the measures. Information about the specific improvements that could be funded by the measures, as well as arguments in favor of the proposals, were found by many voters to be compelling reasons to support the measures. Moreover, this information played an important role in limiting the erosion of support for the mea- sures once respondents were exposed to the types of opposition argu- ments they will likely encounter during an election cycle. Accordingly, one of the keys to building and sustaining support for a local revenue measure will be the presence of an effective, well-orga- nized public outreach effort and independent campaign to that focuses on the need for the measure as well as the many benefits that it will bring. A survey is a snapshot in timeÐwhich means the results of this study How might the eco- nomic or political cli- and the conclusions noted above must be viewed in light of the current mate alter support for economic and political climates. Despite ongoing concerns about the the measure? economy and unemployment, voter support for a sales tax measure was strong, which speaks volumes about the value that Chula Vista voters place on having high quality public facilities and infrastructure. Never- theless, should the economy and/or political climate continue to improve, support for the measure could increase. Conversely, negative economic and/or political developments, especially at the local level, could dampen support for the measure below what was recorded in this study. 10 City of Chula VistaTrue North Research, Inc. © 2015 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 175 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I I MPORTANCEOFSSUES The first substantive question of the survey presented respondents with several issues facing residents in the City and asked them to rate the importance of each issue. Because the same response scale was used for each issue, the results provide an insight into how important each issue is on a scale of importance as well as how each issue ranks in importance relative to the other issues tested. To avoid a systematic position bias, the order in which the issues were pre- sented was randomized for each respondent. Figure 1 presents the issues tested, as well as the importance assigned to each by all 800 survey 5 respondents, sorted by order of importance. Overall, protecting the supply of water received the highest percentage of respondents indicating that the issue was either extremely or very important (93%), followed by creating jobs and improving the local economy (91%), and main- taining the quality of education in local schools (89%). Given the purpose of this study, it is instructive to note that preventing local tax increases (68%) was rated lower in importance than maintaining the quality of city services, facilities and infrastructure (77%). Question 1 To begin, I'm going to read a list of issues facing your community and for each one, please tell me how important you feel the issue is to you, using a scale of extremely important, very important, somewhat important or not at all important. F 1 I I IGUREMPORTANCEOFSSUES Extremely importantVery important Q1eQ1hQ1dQ1bQ1fQ1gQ1aQ1cQ1i Protecting the supply of water 52.440.6 Creating jobs and improving the local economy 43.447.5 Maintaining the quality of education in local schools 53.036.4 Improving public safety 36.445.4 Protecting the environment 34.942.8 Maintaining the quality of city services, facilities and infrastructure 30.546.0 Preventing local tax increases 26.541.2 Reducing traffic congestion 23.837.9 Improving local property values 21.639.3 0102030405060708090100 % Respondents 5.Issues were ranked based on the percentage of respondents who indicated that the issue was either extremely important or very important. 11 City of Chula VistaTrue North Research, Inc. © 2015 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 176 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NEIGHBORHOOD ISSUES Respondents were next asked to identify the biggest issue fac- ing their neighborhood that they would like the City to address. This question was asked in an open-ended manner, which allowed respondents to mention any improvement that came to mind without being prompted by or restricted to a particular list of options. True North later reviewed the verbatim responses and grouped them into the categories shown in Figure 2. Just over one-fifth (22%) of respondents were either unsure of any issues facing their neighbor- hood (9%) or indicated that there were no issues theyÔd like the City to address (12%). Regarding specific suggestions, improving public safety (17%) and improving and repairing streets and roads (16%) were the top mentions, followed by addressing drought and water issues (9%), reducing traffic congestion (8%), improving the local economy and job opportunities (8%), and improving education (7%). Question 2 What would you say is the biggest issue facing your neighborhood that you would like the City to address? F 2 B I F N IGUREIGGESTSSUEACINGEIGHBORHOOD 16.5 Improving public safety 16.3 Improving streets, roads 12.4 No issues, everything is okay 9.1 Not sure, cannot think of any 8.7 Addressing drought, water issues 7.6 Reducing traffic congestion 7.5 Improving local jobs, economy 7.2 Improving education 4.0 Limiting growth, development 3.1 Improving environmental efforts 3.0 Providing more affordable housing 2.5 Addressing homeless issue 2.4 Reducing taxes 1.8 Addressing illegal immigration issues 1.8 Enforcing laws 1.1 Addressing parking issues 1.0 Improving government, leadership 0.8 Improving public transportation 05101520 % Respondents 12 City of Chula VistaTrue North Research, Inc. © 2015 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 177 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I B T NITIALALLOTESTS The primary research objective of this survey was to estimate voter support for a local revenue measure that would fund repairs and improvements to city infrastructure. To accommodate the CityÔs interest in understanding how support for a measure may vary depending on the type of financial mechanism employed, a split-sample methodology was utilized. Half of the sample (400 voters) were administered a survey that focused on a sales tax, whereas a separate 400 vot- ers were asked questions regarding a potential bond measure. Once assigned a particular ver- sion of the measure, the respondent received the same version throughout the survey. Question 3 (sales tax) and 5 (bond) were designed to take an early assessment of votersÔ support for the proposed measures. The motivation for placing Questions 3 and 5 near the front of the survey is twofold. First, voter support for a measure can often depend on the amount of information they have about a mea- sure. At this point in the survey, the respondent has not been provided information about the proposed measure beyond what is presented in the ballot language. This situation is analogous to a voter casting a ballot with limited knowledge about the measure, such as what might occur in the absence of an effective education campaign. Questions 3 and 5, referred to as the Initial Ballot Test for each funding mechanism, are thus good measures of voter support for the pro- posed measure as it is today, on the natural. Because the Initial Ballot Test provides a gauge of natural support for the measure, it also serves a second purpose in that it provides a useful baseline from which to judge the impact of various information items conveyed later in the sur- vey on voter support for the measure. SUPPORT BY MEASURE TYPE Figure 3 on the next page presents the results of the Initial Ballot Test for the sales tax and bond measures. Overall, 69% of voters initially indicated they would support enacting a one-half-cent sales tax in order to fund essential projects and services, including repairing and maintaining city streets, fixing potholes, sidewalks and storm drains; upgrading aging police, fire and 9-1-1 emergency response facilities, equipment and communi- cations to ensure reliable response; maintaining parks, recreation and library facilities and ser- vices; and making water conservation and other infrastructure improvements. Approximately 23% stated that they would oppose the sales tax measure at this point in the survey, whereas 7% were unsure or unwilling to share their vote choice. The level of support recorded for the sales tax at the Initial Ballot Test is approximately 2 percentage points above the two-thirds threshold required for passage of a specific sales tax in California, and 19% above the majority threshold required for a general sales tax. Support for the proposed bond measure at the Initial Ballot Test was similar. Overall, 71% of respondents indicated that they would definitely or probably support a $200 million bond to pro- vide adequate funding for essential city projects and improvements, including repairing and maintaining city streets, fixing potholes, sidewalks and storm drains; upgrading aging police, fire and 9-1-1 emergency response facilities, equipment and communications to ensure reliable response; maintaining parks, recreation and library facilities; and making water conservation and other infrastructure improvements. Approximately 22% stated that they would oppose the bond measure at this point in the survey, whereas 7% were unsure or unwilling to share their vote choice. The level of support recorded for the bond measure at the Initial Ballot Test is approxi- 13 City of Chula VistaTrue North Research, Inc. © 2015 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 178 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . mately 4 percentage points above the two-thirds threshold required for passage of a general obligation bond in California. Question 3 (Sales Tax) To provide adequate funding for essential city projects and services, including repairing and maintaining city streets, fixing potholes, sidewalks and storm drains; upgrading aging police, fire and 9-1-1 emergency response facilities, equipment and communi- cations to ensure reliable response; maintaining parks, recreation and library facilities and ser- vices; and making water conservation and other infrastructure improvements. Shall the City of Chula Vista enact a one-half cent sales tax for a period not to exceed five years, with indepen- dent citizen oversight, annual reports to the community, and all money used to improve Chula Vista? Question 5 (Bond) To provide adequate funding for essential city projects and improvements, including repairing and maintaining city streets, fixing potholes, sidewalks and storm drains; upgrading aging police, fire and 9-1-1 emergency response facilities, equipment and communi- cations to ensure reliable response; maintaining parks, recreation and library facilities; and making water conservation and other infrastructure improvements. Shall the City of Chula Vista issue 200 million dollars in bonds, with independent citizen oversight, annual reports to the com- munity, and all money used to improve Chula Vista? F 3 I B T S V: S T & B IGURENITIALALLOTESTBYURVEYERSIONALESAXOND 100 6.7 6.6 Refused 90 12.3 15.8 80 9.3 Not sure 6.7 70 % Respondents 60 Definitely no 31.635.5 50 Probably no 40 30 Probably yes 20 37.7 35.6 10 Definitely yes 0 Sales TaxBond Survey Version SUPPORT BY SUBGROUPS For the interested reader, Tables 1 and 2 on the following pages show how support at the Initial Ballot Test for the sales tax and bond measures varied by key demographic traits. The blue column (Approximate % of Voter Universe) indicates the per- centage of the likely voter universe that each subgroup category comprises for the sales tax or bond survey. When compared with their respective counterparts, Democrats, those in Single- and Dual- Democratic households, those under the age of 40, renters, and those who live west of the 805 were the most likely to support a local revenue measure within their respective subgroupsÐ be it a sales tax or bond. 14 City of Chula VistaTrue North Research, Inc. © 2015 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 179 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . T 1 D B S I B T: S T ABLEEMOGRAPHICREAKDOWNOFUPPORTATNITIALALLOTESTALESAX pproxmate Ai% of Voter % Probably or UniverseDefinitely Yes% Not sure Overall10069.36.6 Yes 3668.37.5 Child in Hsld (QD1) No6469.45.8 Single family 7366.75.4 Apartment1086.92.5 Home Type (QD2) Condo / Town- home1269.613.4 Mobile home 570.612.8 Very2965.02.2 Attentiveness to Local Somewhat 4767.85.0 Issues (QD3) Slightly, not at all2476.214.6 Single dem 2179.96.5 Dual dem1483.13.7 Single rep1156.70.0 Household Party Type Dual rep1151.313.8 Other1871.29.0 Mixed 2664.76.5 Democrat4283.04.5 PartyRepublican 3050.06.0 Other / DTS2870.010.5 18 to 39 2780.76.9 40 to 491344.918.1 Age 50 to 643470.95.0 65 or older2667.23.1 Yes7063.86.8 Homeowner on Voter File No 3082.26.3 2015 to 20094771.37.3 2008 to 2005 1868.713.1 Registration Year 2004 to 20011574.12.5 2000 or before 2061.62.1 Yes3866.55.2 Likely to Vote by Mail No6271.07.5 Yes 4368.16.3 Likely Jun 2016 Voter No5770.26.9 Male 5067.08.4 Gender Female5071.74.8 East or West of 805 East 5561.07.5 (Precinct)West4579.65.6 15 City of Chula VistaTrue North Research, Inc. © 2015 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 180 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . T 2 D B S I B T: B ABLEEMOGRAPHICREAKDOWNOFUPPORTATNITIALALLOTESTOND pproxmate Ai% of Voter % Probably or UniverseDefinitely Yes% Not sure Overall10071.16.7 Yes 3672.95.8 Child in Hsld (QD1) No6470.27.5 Single family 6967.35.7 Apartment1384.25.6 Home Type (QD2) Condo / Town- home1379.914.5 Mobile home 485.63.2 Very2556.912.4 Attentiveness to Local Somewhat 5278.72.6 Issues (QD3) Slightly, not at all2274.212.5 Single dem 2084.23.5 Dual dem1376.02.1 Single rep1053.25.1 Household Party Type Dual rep1035.419.5 Other1980.95.2 Mixed 2772.48.3 Democrat4279.74.7 PartyRepublican 2948.411.8 Other / DTS2981.34.6 18 to 39 2783.93.2 40 to 491666.39.4 Age 50 to 642872.58.3 65 or older2961.36.0 Yes6465.77.9 Homeowner on Voter File No 3680.64.6 2015 to 20094680.74.1 2008 to 2005 1969.39.5 Registration Year 2004 to 20011468.411.5 2000 or before 2154.16.7 Yes3773.15.1 Likely to Vote by Mail No6369.97.7 Yes 4364.18.3 Likely Jun 2016 Voter No5776.55.5 Male 4967.03.2 Gender Female5175.010.1 East or West of 805 East 5268.96.3 (Precinct)West4873.57.1 REASONS FOR OPPOSING MEASURE Respondents who opposed the measure at Ques- tions 3 or 5 were subsequently asked if there was a particular reason for their position. Ques- tions 4 and 6 were asked in an open-ended manner, allowing respondents to mention any reason that came to mind without being prompted by or restricted to a particular list of options. True North later reviewed the verbatim responses and grouped them into the categories shown in Fig- ure 4 for the sales tax, Figure 5 for the bond. The most frequently-mentioned reason for not sup- porting the sales tax measure was the perception that taxes are already too high (52%), followed by concern that the money would be mismanaged/misspent (31%) and the belief that the mea- sure would be ineffective and that no improvements would be made (12%). The most frequently- mentioned reason for not supporting the bond was also the perception that taxes are already too high (36%), followed by concerns that the money would be mismanaged/misspent (25%) and a need for more information (24%). 16 City of Chula VistaTrue North Research, Inc. © 2015 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 181 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Question 4/6 Is there a particular reason why you do not support the measure I just described? F 4 R F N S M: S T IGUREEASONSOROTUPPORTINGEASUREALESAX Taxes already too high 52.4 31.1 Money will be mismanaged, misspent 11.5 Measure will be ineffective, no improvements 9.3 Not sure, no particular reason 6.7 Need more information 4.8 Measure trying to accomplish too much 0102030405060 % Respondents Who Do Not Support Sales Tax Measure F 5 R F N S M: B IGUREEASONSOROTUPPORTINGEASUREOND 35.5 Taxes already too high 25.2 Money will be mismanaged, misspent 24.2 Need more information 14.6 Not sure, no particular reason 8.0 Other higher priorities in community 6.0 Measure will be ineffective, no improvements 3.6 Measure trying to accomplish too much 010203040 % Respondents Who Do Not Support Bond 17 City of Chula VistaTrue North Research, Inc. © 2015 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 182 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . T T AXHRESHOLD Naturally, voter support for a revenue measure is often contingent on the cost of the measure. The higher the tax rate, all other things being equal, the less likely a voter is to support the mea- sure. One of the goals of this study was thus to gauge the impact that changes in the tax rate can be expected to have on voter support for the proposed revenue measures. SALES TAX The ballot language in Question 3 indicated that the measure would enact a one- half cent sales tax. Respondents who did not say they would definitely support the sales tax measure at the Initial Ballot Test or were unsure were subsequently asked if they would support the proposed sales tax if the rate increase were instead one-quarter percent. As shown in Figure 6, reducing the tax rate to one-quarter percent did not increase overall support for the proposed sales tax measure. In fact, a small percentage of voters (2%) who said they would probably sup- port the measure at one-half cent indicated they would probably not support the measure at one- quarter cent or indicated they were unsure of how they would vote. This shift in support resulted in reducing overall support for the sale tax measure to 67% at this point in the survey. Question 7 (Sales Tax) What if the measure I just described raised the sales tax by a lower amount: one-quarter cent instead of one-half cent? Would you vote yes or no on the measure? F 6 T T: S T, O-Q C IGUREAXHRESHOLDALESAXNEUARTERENT Not sure 5.9 Definitely no Definitely yes at 20.0 half-cent (Q5) 37.7 Probably no 6.7 Definitely yes Probably yes 8.3 21.3 BOND Voter sensitivity to the possible tax impacts of the proposed bond measure was gauged using two approaches. Respondents were first instructed that the amount each home owner will pay if the measure passes depends on the assessed value of their homeÐnot the mar- ket value. Voters were then presented with the highest tax rate ($57 per $100,000 assessed val- uation) and asked if they would support the proposed measure at that rate. If a respondent did not answer definitely yes, they were asked whether they would support the measure at the next lowest tax rate. The four tax rates tested using this methodology and the percentage of respon- dents who indicated they would vote in favor of the measure at each rate are shown in Figure 7 on the next page. 18 City of Chula VistaTrue North Research, Inc. © 2015 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 183 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The most obvious pattern revealed in Figure 7 is that voters are quite price sensitive when it comes to their support for the proposed bond measure. As the cost of the measure to their household increases, support for the bond decreases. At the highest tax rate tested ($57 per $100,000 of assessed valuation), just 34% of voters indicated that they would support the bond. Incremental reductions in the tax rate resulted in incremental increases in support for the mea- sure, with 50% of voters indicating that they would support the bond at the lowest tax rate tested ($28 per $100,000 of assessed valuation). Question 8 (Bond) The amount home owners will pay if the bond passes depends on the assessed value of their home, not the current market value of the home. If you heard that the annual property taxes on your home would increase: _____ per 100,000 dollars of assessed valu- ation, would you vote yes or no on the bond measure? F 7 T T: B IGUREAXHRESHOLDOND Definitely yesProbably yesProbably noDefinitely noNot sure $57 per $100k 17.116.620.535.810.0 34%56% $46 per $100k 22.3 43%20.516.6 50%33.86.8 $34 per $100k 26.221.817.229.35.5 48%46% $28 per $100k 30.119.615.929.44.9 50%45% 0102030405060708090100 % Bond Version Respondents Because voters occasionally overestimate their current assessed valuation and/or have difficulty translating the tax rate into an annualized total, the survey also tested a different approach for conveying the tax rate information for the bond. In addition to presenting a rate as described above, voters were also provided with the total annual cost of the bond for the median home- owner (see Question 9) based on the highest tax rate tested in Question 8. The results to this approach are presented in Figure 8 on the next page. Voters generally respond more positively when the cost of the measure is expressed as an annual total for the median home owner when compared with a rate per $100,000 of assessed valuation. At the highest tax rate tested ($57 per $100,000 of assessed valuation), 34% of voters indicated that they would support the proposed bond measure (see Figure 7 above). When that rate was translated into an annual cost for the median home owner ($186 per year), 43% of those surveyed indicated that they would support the bond (see Figure 8). 19 City of Chula VistaTrue North Research, Inc. © 2015 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 184 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Question 9 (Bond) Let me put it another way: If you knew that this measure would cost the typ- ical home owner about $186 per year, would you vote yes or no on the bond measure? F 8 T T: B, A $186 P Y IGUREAXHRESHOLDONDVERAGEOFEREAR Refused Not sure 0.7 5.2 Definitely yes 21.6 Definitely no 35.0 Probably yes 21.6 Probably no 15.9 20 City of Chula VistaTrue North Research, Inc. © 2015 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 185 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . P & P ROGRAMSROJECTS The ballot language presented in Question 3 indicated that the proposed sales tax would fund essential projects and services, including repairing and maintaining city streets, fixing potholes, sidewalks and storm drains; upgrading aging police, fire and 9-1-1 emergency response facili- ties, equipment and communications to ensure reliable response; maintaining parks, recreation and library facilities and services; and making water conservation and other infrastructure improvements. The bond ballot language was similar, stating that the measure would provide adequate funding for essential city projects and improvements, including repairing and main- taining city streets, fixing potholes, sidewalks and storm drains; upgrading aging police, fire and 9-1-1 emergency response facilities, equipment and communications to ensure reliable response; maintaining parks, recreation and library facilities; and making water conservation and other infrastructure improvements. The purpose of Question 10 was to provide respondents with the full range of programs and projects that may be funded by the proposed measures, as well as identify which of these improvements voters most favored funding with measure proceeds. After reading each item that may be funded by the measure, respondents were asked if they would favor or oppose spending some of the money on that particular item assuming that the measure passes. Truncated descriptions of the improvements tested, as well as votersÔ responses, are shown in Figure 9 for the sales tax, Figure 10 for the bond. Question 10 The measure we've been discussing would provide funding for a variety of proj- ects and improvements. If the measure passes, would you favor or oppose using some of the money to: _____, or do you not have an opinion? F 9 P & P: S T IGUREROGRAMSROJECTSALESAX Strongly favorSomewhat favor Q10d1Q10bQ10cQ10a2 58.724.3 Pave, maintain and repair city streets and fix potholes 48.434.3 Repair or replace failing storm drain pipes that can create sink holes 52.429.0 Repair broken sidewalks, curbs and gutters 57.323.9 Upgrade police, fire, 9-1-1 response facilities, equipment, communications Q10mQ10jQ10lQ10d2Q10kQ10eQ10f1Q10hQ10gQ10f2Q10iQ10a1 55.724.6 Pave, maintain and repair city streets Retrofit storm drains to capture trash and reduce water pollution 51.528.0 Maintain safe and clean parks 48.230.8 Improve wildfire response and prevention 51.926.4 53.923.9 Upgrade the CityÔs irrigation, drainage systems to conserve drinking water 50.126.5 Maintain parks, rec. facilities including courts, fields, pools, playgrounds 46.226.6 Repair libraries, rec. centers, fire stations/roofs, plumbing, elect systems 40.931.4 Maintain public libraries and technology Replace aging police, fire, public safety vehicles to ensure reliable response 41.527.4 Remove asbestos, lead paint, hazards from libraries, centers, fire stations 38.827.1 44.221.5 Provide infrastructure needed to attract a four-year University to Chula Vista Remove graffiti faster 33.624.9 0102030405060708090100 % Respondents: Sales Tax 21 City of Chula VistaTrue North Research, Inc. © 2015 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 186 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . There was no shortage of projects on which voters would favor spending measure proceeds. Overall, the item that resonated with the largest percentage of respondents for the sales tax measure was paving, maintaining and repairing city streets and fixing potholes (83% strongly or somewhat favor), followed by repairing or replacing failing storm drain pipes that can create sink holes in city streets (83%), repairing broken sidewalks, curbs and gutters (81%), and upgrading aging police, fire and 9-1-1 emergency response facilities, equipment and communications to ensure reliable response (81%). For the bond, the projects that resonated with the largest percentage of respondents were pav- ing, maintaining, and repairing city streets (80% strongly or somewhat favor) and fixing potholes (80%), upgrading the City's irrigation and drainage systems to conserve drinking water (79%), ret- rofitting storm drains to capture trash and reduce water pollution (77%), and maintaining parks and recreation facilities including courts, fields, pools and playgrounds (76%). F 10 P & P: B IGUREROGRAMSROJECTSOND Strongly favorSomewhat favor Q10jQ10lQ10d2Q10kQ10f2Q10cQ10bQ10eQ10d1Q10gQ10f1Q10iQ10hQ10a2Q10a1 49.830.6 Pave, maintain and repair city streets Pave, maintain and repair city streets and fix potholes 50.529.0 Upgrade the CityÔs irrigation, drainage systems to conserve drinking water 56.622.7 Retrofit storm drains to capture trash and reduce water pollution 48.129.1 Maintain parks, rec. facilities including courts, fields, pools, playgrounds 42.933.4 48.527.3 Improve wildfire response and prevention Upgrade police, fire, 9-1-1 response facilities, equipment, communications 55.119.9 Repair libraries, rec. centers, fire stations/roofs, plumbing, elect systems 44.330.5 Repair broken sidewalks, curbs and gutters 44.430.1 Repair or replace failing storm drain pipes that can create sink holes 50.423.6 42.429.4 Maintain safe and clean parks Maintain public libraries and technology 38.632.9 Replace aging police, fire, public safety vehicles to ensure reliable response 46.620.2 Remove asbestos, lead paint, hazards from libraries, centers, fire stations 38.325.7 Provide infrastructure needed to attract a four-year University to Chula Vista 39.819.1 0102030405060708090100 % Respondents: Bond PROGRAM & PROJECT RATINGS BY SUBGROUP Table 3 on the next page presents the top five sales tax programs (showing the percentage of respondents who strongly favor each) by position at the Initial Ballot Test. Table 4 provides the same information for the bond. Not surprisingly, individuals who initially opposed the measure or were unsure of their position were generally less likely to favor spending money on a given program or project when com- pared with supporters. Nevertheless, initial supporters, opponents, and the undecided did agree on several of the top priorities for funding. 22 City of Chula VistaTrue North Research, Inc. © 2015 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 187 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . T 3 T P & P P I B T: S T ABLEOPROGRAMSROJECTSBYOSITIONATNITIALALLOTESTALESAX oston at Pii Initial Ballot % Strongly Test (Q3)ItemProgram or Project SummaryFavor Q10a2Pave, maintain and repair city streets and fix potholes72 Probably or Upgrade the CityÔs irrigation, drainage systems to conserve drinking water Q10h68 Definitely Yes Q10a1Pave, maintain and repair city streets67 (n = 278)Upgrade police, fire, 9-1-1 emergency response facilities, equipment, communications Q10d167 Q10iRetrofit storm drains to capture trash and reduce water pollution62 Q10d1Upgrade police, fire, 9-1-1 emergency response facilities, equipment, communications40 Probably or Q10d2Replace aging police, fire and public safety vehicles to ensure reliable response34 Definitely Q10gImprove wildfire response and prevention33 No (n = 90)Pave, maintain and repair city streets Q10a131 Q10cRepair or replace failing storm drain pipes that can create sink holes in city streets29 Improve wildfire response and prevention Q10g58 Q10jProvide the infrastructure needed to attract a four-year University to Chula Vista48 Not Sure Retrofit storm drains to capture trash and reduce water pollution Q10i44 (n =27) Q10f1Maintain parks, recreation facilities including courts, fields, pools, playgrounds42 Q10f2Maintain safe and clean parks36 T 4 T P & P P I B T: B ABLEOPROGRAMSROJECTSBYOSITIONATNITIALALLOTESTOND oston at Pii Initial Ballot % Strongly Test (Q5)ItemProgram or Project SummaryFavor Q10hUpgrade the CityÔs irrigation, drainage systems to conserve drinking water68 Probably or Upgrade police, fire, 9-1-1 emergency response facilities, equipment, communications Q10d164 Definitely Yes Q10cRepair or replace failing storm drain pipes that can create sink holes in city streets61 (n = 285)Pave, maintain and repair city streets and fix potholes Q10a260 Q10a1Pave, maintain and repair city streets60 Q10d1Upgrade police, fire, 9-1-1 emergency response facilities, equipment, communications33 Probably or Q10d2Replace aging police, fire and public safety vehicles to ensure reliable response27 Definitely No Q10a2Pave, maintain and repair city streets and fix potholes25 (n = 86)Repair or replace failing storm drain pipes that can create sink holes in city streets Q10c23 Q10gImprove wildfire response and prevention22 Pave, maintain and repair city streets Q10a149 Q10hUpgrade the CityÔs irrigation, drainage systems to conserve drinking water44 Not Sure Retrofit storm drains to capture trash and reduce water pollution Q10i38 (n =27) Q10f1Maintain parks, recreation facilities including courts, fields, pools, playgrounds37 Q10d1Upgrade police, fire, 9-1-1 emergency response facilities, equipment, communications27 23 City of Chula VistaTrue North Research, Inc. © 2015 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 188 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . P A OSITIVERGUMENTS If the City chooses to place a measure on an upcoming ballot, voters will be exposed to various arguments about the measure in the ensuing months. Proponents of the measure will present arguments to persuade voters to support it, just as opponents may present arguments to achieve the opposite goal. For this study to be a reliable gauge of voter support for the proposed measures, it is important that the survey simulate the type of discussion and debate that will occur prior to the vote taking place and identify how this information ultimately shapes votersÔ opinions about the measures. The objective of Question 11 was to present respondents with arguments in favor of the pro- posed measure (sales tax and/or bond) and identify whether they felt the arguments were con- vincing reasons to support it. Arguments in opposition to the measure were also presented and will be discussed later in this report (see Negative Arguments on page 30). Within each series, specific arguments were administered in random order to avoid a systematic position bias. Question 11 What I'd like to do now is tell you what some people may say about the measure we've been discussing. Supporters of the measure will say: _____. Do you think this is a very con- vincing, somewhat convincing, or not at all convincing reason to SUPPORT the measure? F 11 P A: S T IGUREOSITIVERGUMENTSALESAX Very convincingSomewhat convincing Q11hQ11gQ11nQ11mQ11jQ11lQ11kQ11aQ11bQ11iQ11dQ11cQ11fQ11e Measure will ensure police, firefighters have equipment to respond quickly50.633.8 City's storm drain system is 50+ yrs old, need of repair before collapsing 49.433.2 By keeping city safe, measure will help protect quality of life, property values44.337.7 Measure will allow to keep up with basic infrastructure repairs, maintenance47.633.9 Improving infrastructure will help economy, and attract new business, jobs 36.539.4 There will be a clear system of fiscal accountability44.231.5 39.335.4 Money will be used to fun essential city projects, improvements Measure will help save money, water by upgrading irrigation, drainage sys. 40.434.1 Resources, tech, services at libraries are essential for vets, trying to find jobs35.039.0 44.329.6 Parks, rec. centers help keep kids healthy, active away from drugs, gangs Substantial amount of $$ raised by sales tax will come form non-residents 35.638.0 Tax will be for a short time, canÔt be increased, extended without approval36.632.0 35.332.5 Measure will help attract 4yr University to provide affordable education City made smart financial decisions, refi past bonds to save taxpayers mil.23.543.7 0102030405060708090100 % Respondents: Sales Tax Figure 11 above presents the truncated positive arguments tested in the sales tax survey, as well as votersÔ reactions to the arguments. The arguments are ranked from most convincing to least convincing based on the percentage of respondents who indicated the argument was either a Óvery convincingÔ or Ósomewhat convincingÔ reason to support the measure. Using this methodol- ogy, the most compelling positive arguments were: When you have an emergency, you need help fast. Minutes count in these situations. This measure will ensure that our police and firefighters 24 City of Chula VistaTrue North Research, Inc. © 2015 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 189 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . have the vehicles and life-saving equipment they need to respond quickly to 9-1-1 emergencies (84%), Much of the City's storm drain system is more than 50 years old. We need to start replac- ing and repairing the system before pipes begin collapsing and create sink holes, flooding, pollu- tion, and millions of dollars in property damage (83%), and By keeping our city safe, clean and well-maintained, this measure will help protect our quality of life and our property values (82%). For the bond survey (see Figure 12 below), the most compelling positive arguments were the same: When you have an emergency, you need help fast. Minutes count in these situations. This measure will ensure that our police and firefighters have the vehicles and life-saving equipment they need to respond quickly to 9-1-1 emergencies (84%), Much of the City's storm drain system is more than 50 years old. We need to start replacing and repairing the system before pipes begin collapsing and create sink holes, flooding, pollution, and millions of dollars in property damage, (81%) and By keeping our city safe, clean and well-maintained, this measure will help protect our quality of life and our property values (80%). F 12 P A: B IGUREOSITIVERGUMENTSOND Very convincingSomewhat convincing Q11gQ11hQ11iQ11aQ11lQ11oQ11jQ11kQ11bQ11dQ11cQ11fQ11e Measure will ensure police, firefighters have equipment to respond quickly47.736.5 City's storm drain system is 50+ yrs old, need of repair before collapsing42.937.8 By keeping city safe, measure will help protect quality of life, property values35.144.9 Measure will allow to keep up with basic infrastructure repairs, maintenance39.739.9 There will be a clear system of fiscal accountability36.241.4 Measure will help save money, water by upgrading irrigation, drainage sys.42.634.5 Parks, rec. centers help keep kids healthy, active away from drugs, gangs36.239.6 Money raised by can only be spent on specific projects, improvements40.235.0 28.245.4 Resources, tech, services at libraries are essential for vets, trying to find jobs Money will be used to fun essential city projects, improvements35.438.3 Improving infrastructure will help economy, and attract new business, jobs32.637.8 22.643.1 City made smart financial decisions, refi past bonds to save taxpayers mil. Measure will help attract 4yr University to provide affordable education32.233.3 0102030405060708090100 % Respondents: Bond POSITIVE ARGUMENTS BY INITIAL SUPPORT For the interested reader, Tables 5 and 6 on the next page list the top five most convincing positive arguments (showing the percentage of respondents who cited it as very convincing) according to respondentsÔ vote choice at the Ini- tial Ballot Test for the sales tax and bond surveys, respectively. The most striking pattern in the tables is that the positive arguments resonated with a much higher percentage of voters who were initially inclined to support the measure or were unsure when compared to voters who ini- tially opposed the measure. Nevertheless, all three groups ranked several of the same arguments as being among the most compelling. 25 City of Chula VistaTrue North Research, Inc. © 2015 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 190 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . T 5 T P A P I B T: S T ABLEOPOSITIVERGUMENTSBYOSITIONATNITIALALLOTESTALESAX oston at Pii Initial Ballot % Very Test (Q3)ItemPositive Argument SummaryConvincing Q11eMeasure will ensure police, firefighters have vehicles, equipment to respond quickly62 Probably or City's storm drain system is 50+ yrs old, need of replace, repair before collapsing Q11f61 Definitely Yes Q11dMeasure will allow to keep up with basic infrastructure repairs, maintenance61 (n = 278)There will be a clear system of fiscal accountability Q11b56 Q11jParks, recreation centers help keep kids healthy, active away from drugs, gangs, crime56 Q11fCity's storm drain system is 50+ yrs old, need of replace, repair before collapsing21 Probably or By keeping city safe, measure will help protect our quality of life, property values Q11c19 Definitely No Q11bThere will be a clear system of fiscal accountability18 (n = 90)Measure will ensure police, firefighters have vehicles, equipment to respond quickly Q11e18 Q11nTax will be for a limited duration, canÔt be increased or extended without voter approval14 Measure will ensure police, firefighters have vehicles, equipment to respond quickly Q11e48 Q11kMeasure will help save money, conserve water by upgrading irrigation, drainage systems38 Not Sure Q11jParks, recreation centers help keep kids healthy, active away from drugs, gangs, crime35 (n = 27) Q11nTax will be for a limited duration, canÔt be increased or extended without voter approval32 Q11fCity's storm drain system is 50+ yrs old, need of replace, repair before collapsing32 T 6 T P A P I B T: B ABLEOPOSITIVERGUMENTSBYOSITIONATNITIALALLOTESTOND oston at Pii Initial Ballot % Very Test (Q5)ItemPositive Argument SummaryConvincing Q11eMeasure will ensure police, firefighters have vehicles, equipment to respond quickly57 Probably or City's storm drain system is 50+ yrs old, need of replace, repair before collapsing Q11f57 Definitely Yes Q11kMeasure will help save money, conserve water by upgrading irrigation, drainage systems55 (n = 285) Measure will allow to keep up with basic infrastructure repairs, maintenance Q11d52 Q11oMoney raised by bond can only be spent on specific projects, improvements48 Q11eMeasure will ensure police, firefighters have vehicles, equipment to respond quickly20 Probably or Money raised by bond can only be spent on specific projects, improvements Q11o18 Definitely Q11gMeasure will help attract 4yr University to provide affordable access to education14 No (n = 86)By keeping city safe, measure will help protect our quality of life, property values Q11c13 Q11bThere will be a clear system of fiscal accountability13 Measure will ensure police, firefighters have vehicles, equipment to respond quickly Q11e33 Q11aMoney will be used to fun essential city projects, improvements32 Not Sure Q11oMoney raised by bond can only be spent on specific projects, improvements27 (n = 27) Q11bThere will be a clear system of fiscal accountability24 Q11kMeasure will help save money, conserve water by upgrading irrigation, drainage systems19 26 City of Chula VistaTrue North Research, Inc. © 2015 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 191 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I B T NTERIMALLOTESTS After informing respondents about the potential tax rates associated with the measure, the proj- ects that could be funded, as well as exposing them to positive arguments they may encounter during an election cycle, the survey again presented voters with the ballot language used previ- ously to gauge how their support for the proposed sales tax or bond measure may have changed. As shown in Figure 13, overall support for the sales tax measure at this point remained steady at 69%, with 27% of respondents opposed to the measure and an additional 4% unsure or unwilling to state their vote choice. Overall support for the bond declined 7 percentage points from the Initial Ballot Test to 64%, with 27% of respondents opposed to the measure, and 8% unsure or unwilling to state their vote choice. Question 12 (Sales Tax) Sometimes people change their minds about a measure once they have more information about it. Now that you have heard a bit more about the measure, let me read you a summary of it again. To provide adequate funding for essential city projects and ser- vices, including repairing and maintaining city streets, fixing potholes, sidewalks and storm drains; upgrading aging police, fire and 9-1-1 emergency response facilities, equipment and communications to ensure reliable response; maintaining parks, recreation and library facilities and services; and making water conservation and other infrastructure improvements. Shall the City of Chula Vista enact a one-half cent sales tax for a period not to exceed five years, with inde- pendent citizen oversight, annual reports to the community, and all money used to improve Chula Vista? Question 13 (Bond) Sometimes people change their minds about a measure once they have more information about it. Now that you have heard a bit more about the measure, let me read you a summary of it again. To provide adequate funding for essential city projects and improve- ments, including repairing and maintaining city streets, fixing potholes, sidewalks and storm drains; upgrading aging police, fire and 9-1-1 emergency response facilities, equipment and communications to ensure reliable response; maintaining parks, recreation and library facilities; and making water conservation and other infrastructure improvements. Shall the City of Chula Vista issue 200 million dollars in bonds, with independent citizen oversight, annual reports to the community, and all money used to improve Chula Vista? F 13 I B T S V: S T & B IGURENTERIMALLOTESTBYURVEYERSIONALESAXOND 100 4.0 8.1 Refused 90 16.5 16.0 80 Not sure 10.2 11.3 70 % Respondents 60 Definitely no 30.1 50 30.2 Probably no 40 30 Probably yes 20 38.9 33.9 10 Definitely yes 0 Sales TaxBond Survey Version 27 City of Chula VistaTrue North Research, Inc. © 2015 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 192 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . SUPPORT BY SUBGROUPS For the interested reader, Tables 7 and 8 display how support for the sales tax and bond measures at this point in the survey varied by key demographic sub- groups, as well as the percentage change in subgroup support when compared to the Initial Bal- lot Test. Positive differences appear in green, whereas negative differences appear in red. T 7 D B S I B T: S T ABLEEMOGRAPHICREAKDOWNOFUPPORTATNTERIMALLOTESTALESAX pproxmate ane rom Ai%ChgF of Voter % Probably or Initial Ballot UniverseDefinitely YesTest (Q3) Overall10069.0-0.3 Yes 3669.4+1.1 Child in Hsld (QD1) No6468.9-0.4 Single family 7366.6-0.0 Apartment1079.9-7.1 Home Type (QD2) Condo / Town- home1279.2+9.6 Mobile home 572.1+1.5 Very2962.9-2.1 Attentiveness to Local Somewhat 4769.3+1.5 Issues (QD3) Slightly, not at all2477.4+1.2 Single dem 2176.4-3.5 Dual dem1475.8-7.4 Single rep1155.5-1.2 Household Party Type Dual rep1165.7+14.4 Other1866.5-4.7 Mixed 2668.2+3.6 Democrat4280.1-2.9 PartyRepublican 3055.2+5.2 Other / DTS2867.7-2.3 18 to 39 2776.8-3.9 40 to 491358.8+13.8 Age 50 to 643472.3+1.5 65 or older2662.0-5.2 Yes7063.9+0.1 Homeowner on Voter File No 3081.1-1.1 2015 to 20094770.3-1.0 2008 to 2005 1874.2+5.5 Registration Year 2004 to 20011573.9-0.1 2000 or before 2057.6-4.1 Yes3863.3-3.3 Likely to Vote by Mail No6272.5+1.5 Yes 4363.7-4.4 Likely Jun 2016 Voter No5773.1+2.8 Male 5073.0+6.0 Gender Female5065.0-6.7 East or West of 805 East 5566.2+5.2 (Precinct)West4572.5-7.0 28 City of Chula VistaTrue North Research, Inc. © 2015 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 193 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . T 8 D B S I B T: B ABLEEMOGRAPHICREAKDOWNOFUPPORTATNTERIMALLOTESTOND pproxmate ane rom Ai%ChgF of Voter % Probably or Initial Ballot UniverseDefinitely YesTest (Q5) Overall10064.1-7.0 Yes 3664.9-8.0 Child in Hsld (QD1) No6463.2-7.0 Single family 6960.0-7.3 Apartment1385.4+1.3 Home Type (QD2) Condo / Town- home1364.8-15.1 Mobile home 467.9-17.7 Very2547.9-9.0 Attentiveness to Local Somewhat 5272.0-6.7 Issues (QD3) Slightly, not at all2263.9-10.3 Single dem 2083.0-1.3 Dual dem1366.9-9.1 Single rep1053.2No change Household Party Type Dual rep1040.1+4.8 Other1970.8-10.0 Mixed 2756.9-15.5 Democrat4274.3-5.5 PartyRepublican 2947.7-0.7 Other / DTS2965.6-15.7 18 to 39 2775.2-8.7 40 to 491657.3-9.0 Age 50 to 642861.5-10.9 65 or older2959.6-1.7 Yes6456.2-9.5 Homeowner on Voter File No 3677.9-2.7 2015 to 20094671.2-9.5 2008 to 2005 1967.6-1.6 Registration Year 2004 to 20011459.3-9.1 2000 or before 2149.0-5.1 Yes3767.9-5.2 Likely to Vote by Mail No6361.8-8.1 Yes 4359.8-4.3 Likely Jun 2016 Voter No5767.3-9.2 Male 4963.2-3.8 Gender Female5164.9-10.1 East or West of 805 East 5259.0-9.9 (Precinct)West4869.5-4.0 29 City of Chula VistaTrue North Research, Inc. © 2015 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 194 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . N A EGATIVERGUMENTS Whereas Question 11 presented respondents with arguments in favor of the measures, Question 14 presented respondents with arguments designed to elicit opposition to the measures. In the case of Question 14, however, respondents were asked whether they felt that the argument was a very convincing, somewhat convincing, or not at all convincing reason to oppose the measure. The arguments tested, as well as votersÔ opinions about the arguments, are presented in Figure 14 for the sales tax version and Figure 15 for the bond survey. Question 14 Next, let me tell you what opponents of the measure will say.Opponents of the measure will say: _____. Do you think this is a very convincing, somewhat convincing, or not at all convincing reason to OPPOSE the measure? F 14 N A: S T IGUREEGATIVERGUMENTSALESAX Very convincingSomewhat convincing Q14bQ14eQ14dQ14aQ14c This tax will hurt seniors and others on fixed-incomes. 29.640.8 Sluggish economy, now is NOT the time to be raising taxes 30.039.3 Can't trust city with tax, money will be mismanaged, misspent 24.840.9 City just raised the sales tax a couple of years ago 27.135.8 Raising taxes will hurt our local businesses and our local economy 21.041.2 0102030405060708090100 % Respondents: Sales Tax Among the negative arguments tested for the sales tax, the most compelling were: This tax will hurt seniors and others on fixed-incomes (70%), People are having a hard time making ends meet with high unemployment and a sluggish economy. Now is NOT the time to be raising taxes (69%), and We can't trust the City with this tax. They will mismanage the money or spend it on their own pet projects (66%). Among the negative arguments tested for the bond measure, the most compelling were: This tax will hurt seniors and others on fixed-incomes (72%), Raising taxes will hurt our local businesses and our local economy (70%), and Taxpayers will be paying for this bond for the next 30 years. That is too much debt (69%). F 15 N A: B IGUREEGATIVERGUMENTSOND Very convincingSomewhat convincing Q14dQ14aQ14fQ14bQ14c This tax will hurt seniors and others on fixed-incomes. 38.033.7 Raising taxes will hurt our local businesses and our local economy 29.341.0 Taxpayers will be paying for 30 years for bond, that is too much debt 35.233.8 Sluggish economy, now is NOT the time to be raising taxes 39.428.9 Can't trust city with tax, money will be mismanaged, misspent 28.838.2 0102030405060708090100 % Respondents: Bond 30 City of Chula VistaTrue North Research, Inc. © 2015 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 195 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NEGATIVE ARGUMENTS BY INITIAL SUPPORT Tables 9 and 10 rank the negative arguments (showing the percentage of respondents who cited each as very convincing) accord- ing to respondentsÔ vote choice at the Initial Ballot Test for the sales tax and bond measure, respectively. T 9 N A P I B T: S T ABLEEGATIVERGUMENTSBYOSITIONATNITIALALLOTESTALESAX oston at Pii Initial Ballot % Very Test (Q3)ItemNegative Argument SummaryConvincing Q14aSluggish economy, now is NOT the time to be raising taxes24 This tax will hurt seniors and others on fixed-incomes. Probably or Q14c23 Definitely Yes Q14eCity just raised the sales tax a couple of years ago20 Can't trust city with tax, money will be mismanaged, misspent (n = 278) Q14d17 Q14bRaising taxes will hurt our local businesses and our local economy14 Q14eCity just raised the sales tax a couple of years ago55 Probably or Q14cThis tax will hurt seniors and others on fixed-incomes.55 Definitely No Q14aSluggish economy, now is NOT the time to be raising taxes55 (n = 90) Q14dCan't trust city with tax, money will be mismanaged, misspent47 Raising taxes will hurt our local businesses and our local econom y46 Q14b Q14dCan't trust city with tax, money will be mismanaged, misspent35 Sluggish economy, now is NOT the time to be raising taxes Q14a19 Not Sure Q14cThis tax will hurt seniors and others on fixed-incomes.16 (n =27) Q14bRaising taxes will hurt our local businesses and our local economy15 Q14eCity just raised the sales tax a couple of years ago12 T 10 N A P I B T: B ABLEEGATIVERGUMENTSBYOSITIONATNITIALALLOTESTOND oston at Pii Initial Ballot % Very Test (Q5)ItemNegative Argument SummaryConvincing Q14aSluggish economy, now is NOT the time to be raising taxes38 Probably or This tax will hurt seniors and others on fixed-incomes. Q14c36 Definitely Yes Q14fTaxpayers will be paying for this bond for the next 30 years, that is too much debt28 (n = 285)Raising taxes will hurt our local businesses and our local economy Q14b27 Q14dCan't trust city with tax, money will be mismanaged, misspent22 Q14fTaxpayers will be paying for this bond for the next 30 years, that is too much debt59 Probably or Q14dCan't trust city with tax, money will be mismanaged, misspent49 Definitely No Q14aSluggish economy, now is NOT the time to be raising taxes45 (n = 86)This tax will hurt seniors and others on fixed-incomes. Q14c44 Q14bRaising taxes will hurt our local businesses and our local economy42 Sluggish economy, now is NOT the time to be raising taxes Q14a44 Q14fTaxpayers will be paying for this bond for the next 30 years, that is too much debt43 Not Sure This tax will hurt seniors and others on fixed-incomes. Q14c39 (n =27) Q14dCan't trust city with tax, money will be mismanaged, misspent35 Q14bRaising taxes will hurt our local businesses and our local economy17 31 City of Chula VistaTrue North Research, Inc. © 2015 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 196 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F B T INALALLOTESTS VotersÔ opinions about ballot measures are often not rigid, especially when the amount of infor- mation presented to the public on a measure has been limited. An important goal of the survey was thus to gauge how votersÔ opinions about the proposed measures may be affected by the information they could encounter during the course of an election cycle. After providing respon- dents with the wording of the proposed measures, possible tax rates, programs and projects that could be funded by the measures, as well as arguments in favor and against the proposals, respondents were again asked whether they would vote ÓyesÔ or ÓnoÔ on the proposed sales tax and bond measures. Question 15 (Sales Tax) Now that you have heard a bit more about the measure, let me read you a summary of it one more time. To provide adequate funding for essential city projects and services, including repairing and maintaining city streets, fixing potholes, sidewalks and storm drains; upgrading aging police, fire and 9-1-1 emergency response facilities, equipment and communications to ensure reliable response; maintaining parks, recreation and library facilities and services; and making water conservation and other infrastructure improvements. Shall the City of Chula Vista enact a one-half cent sales tax for a period not to exceed five years, with inde- pendent citizen oversight, annual reports to the community, and all money used to improve Chula Vista? Question 16 (Bond) Now that you have heard a bit more about the measure, let me read you a summary of it one more time. To provide adequate funding for essential city projects and improvements, including repairing and maintaining city streets, fixing potholes, sidewalks and storm drains; upgrading aging police, fire and 9-1-1 emergency response facilities, equipment and communications to ensure reliable response; maintaining parks, recreation and library facil- ities; and making water conservation and other infrastructure improvements. Shall the City of Chula Vista issue 200 million dollars in bonds, with independent citizen oversight, annual reports to the community, and all money used to improve Chula Vista? F 16 F B T S V: S T & B IGUREINALALLOTESTBYURVEYERSIONALESAXOND 100 3.8 5.2 Refused 90 20.0 19.9 80 Not sure 8.4 70 % Respondents 13.9 60 Definitely no 30.2 50 27.8 Probably no 40 30 Probably yes 20 37.2 31.7 10 Definitely yes 0 Sales TaxBond Survey Version 32 City of Chula VistaTrue North Research, Inc. © 2015 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 197 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . As shown in Figure 16 on the previous page, at this point in the survey, support for the sales tax measure was found among 67% of voters, with 28% opposed to the measure and 4% unsure or unwilling to state their vote choice. Support for the bond dipped again to 60%, with 34% opposed to the measure and 7% unsure or unwilling to state their vote choice. 33 City of Chula VistaTrue North Research, Inc. © 2015 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 198 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C S HANGEINUPPORT Tables 11 and 12 provide a closer look at how support for the proposed sales tax and bond mea- sures changed over the course of the interview by calculating the difference in support between the Initial, Interim, and Final Ballot Tests within various subgroups of voters. The percentage of support for the measure at the Final Ballot Test is shown in the column with the heading % Prob- ably or Definitely Yes. The columns to the right show the difference between the Final and the Initial, and the Final and Interim Ballot Tests. Positive differences appear in green, negative dif- ferences in red. T 11 D B S F B T: S T ABLEEMOGRAPHICREAKDOWNOFUPPORTATINALALLOTESTALESAX pproxmate ange rom ange rom Ai%ChFChF of Voter % Probably or Initial Ballot Interim Ballot UniverseDefinitely YesTest (Q3)Test (Q12) Overall10067.4-1.9-1.7 Yes 3667.6-0.7-1.9 Child in Hsld (QD1) No6466.7-2.7-2.3 Single family 7366.1-0.6-0.6 Apartment1081.0-6.0+1.1 Home Type (QD2) Condo / Town- home1273.6+3.9-5.6 Mobile home 546.0-24.6-26.1 Very2960.3-4.7-2.6 Attentiveness to Local Somewhat 4768.1+0.3-1.2 Issues (QD3) Slightly, not at all2471.7-4.5-5.6 Single dem 2175.9-4.0-0.5 Dual dem1475.8-7.4No change Single rep1157.6+0.9+2.2 Household Party Type Dual rep1148.4-2.9-17.3 Other1861.8-9.4-4.7 Mixed 2671.8+7.2+3.6 Democrat4279.8-3.2-0.3 PartyRepublican 3051.7+1.7-3.5 Other / DTS2866.0-4.1-1.7 18 to 39 2777.0-3.7+0.2 40 to 491357.5+12.6-1.2 Age 50 to 643470.9+0.0-1.4 65 or older2658.0-9.2-4.0 Yes7063.8-0.1-0.1 Homeowner on Voter File No 3075.9-6.3-5.3 2015 to 20094769.7-1.5-0.5 2008 to 2005 1872.8+4.1-1.4 Registration Year 2004 to 20011563.8-10.2-10.1 2000 or before 2059.2-2.4+1.7 Yes3858.3-8.2-4.9 Likely to Vote by Mail No6272.8+1.8+0.3 Yes 4361.2-6.9-2.5 Likely Jun 2016 Voter No5772.1+1.8-1.0 Male 5069.0+2.0-4.0 Gender Female5065.7-6.0+0.7 East or West of 805 East 5562.6+1.6-3.6 (Precinct)West4573.2-6.4+0.7 34 City of Chula VistaTrue North Research, Inc. © 2015 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 199 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . T 12 D B S F B T: B ABLEEMOGRAPHICREAKDOWNOFUPPORTATINALALLOTESTOND pproxmate ange rom ange rom Ai%ChFChF of Voter % Probably or Initial Ballot Interim Ballot UniverseDefinitely YesTest (Q5)Test (Q13) Overall10059.5-11.6-4.6 Yes 3655.4-17.5-9.5 Child in Hsld (QD1) No6462.0-8.2-1.2 Single family 6955.8-11.5-4.2 Apartment1382.6-1.6-2.9 Home Type (QD2) Condo / Town- home1357.4-22.4-7.4 Mobile home 478.4-7.2+10.5 Very2545.6-11.3-2.3 Attentiveness to Local Somewhat 5269.8-8.9-2.2 Issues (QD3) Slightly, not at all2256.2-18.0-7.7 Single dem 2076.8-7.4-6.2 Dual dem1369.0-7.0+2.1 Single rep1050.6-2.6-2.6 Household Party Type Dual rep1026.9-8.4-13.2 Other1968.2-12.6-2.6 Mixed 2751.4-21.1-5.5 Democrat4271.9-7.8-2.3 PartyRepublican 2938.9-9.5-8.8 Other / DTS2962.0-19.3-3.5 18 to 39 2767.9-16.0-7.3 40 to 491653.4-12.9-3.9 Age 50 to 642858.6-13.9-2.9 65 or older2956.6-4.8-3.0 Yes6451.6-14.1-4.6 Homeowner on Voter File No 3673.3-7.2-4.6 2015 to 20094664.8-15.9-6.4 2008 to 2005 1959.8-9.5-7.9 Registration Year 2004 to 20011460.7-7.7+1.4 2000 or before 2147.2-6.9-1.8 Yes3763.5-9.6-4.4 Likely to Vote by Mail No6357.1-12.8-4.7 Yes 4355.5-8.5-4.3 Likely Jun 2016 Voter No5762.5-13.9-4.8 Male 4959.0-8.0-4.2 Gender Female5160.0-15.0-4.9 East or West of 805 East 5254.6-14.3-4.4 (Precinct)West4864.7-8.7-4.7 As expected, most groups responded to the negative arguments with a reduction in their sup- port for the sales tax and bond measures when compared with the levels recorded at the Interim Ballot Test. However, the general trend over the course of the entire survey (Initial to Final Ballot Test) was one of stability for the sales tax measure (-2%) and declining support for the bond (-12%). Whereas Tables 11 and 12 display change in support for the measure over the course of the interview at the group level, Tables 13 and 14 on the next page display individual-level changes that occurred between the Initial and Final Ballot Tests for the respective measures. On the left side of the tables is shown each of the response options to the Initial Ballot Test and the percent- age of respondents in each group. The cells in the body of the tables depict movement within each response group (row) based on the information provided throughout the course of the sur- vey as recorded by the Final Ballot Test. 35 City of Chula VistaTrue North Research, Inc. © 2015 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 200 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . For example, in the first row of Table 13 we see that of the 37.7% of respondents who indicated that they would definitely support the sales tax measure at the Initial Ballot Test, 28.4% also indi- cated that they would definitely support the measure at the Final Ballot Test. Approximately 6.5% moved to the probably support group, 1.9% moved to the probably oppose group, 0.5% moved to the definitely oppose group, and 0.4% percent stated they were now unsure of their vote choice. To ease interpretation of the tables, the cells are color coded. Red shaded cells indicate declining support, green shaded cells indicate increasing support, whereas white cells indicate no move- ment. Moreover, within the cells, a white font indicates a fundamental change in the vote: from yes to no, no to yes, or not sure to either yes or no. T 13 M B I & F B T: S T ABLEOVEMENTETWEENNITIALINALALLOTESTSALESAX Final Ballot Test: Sales Tax (Q15) Definitely Probably Probably Definitely Initial Ballot Test: supportsupportopposeopposeNot sure Sales Tax (Q3) Definitely support37.7%28.4%6.5%1.9%0.5%0.4% Probably support31.6%8.4%17.8%1.9%2.6%0.9% Probably oppose6.7%0.0%0.8%2.9%2.2%0.8% Definitely oppose15.8%0.4%0.8%0.3%13.4%0.9% Not sure8.2%0.0%4.3%1.3%1.4%1.2% T 14 M B I & F B T: B ABLEOVEMENTETWEENNITIALINALALLOTESTSOND Final Ballot Test: Bond (Q16) Definitely Probably Probably Definitely Initial Ballot Test: Bond (Q5) supportsupportopposeopposeNot sure Definitely support35.6%23.1%8.1%1.4%2.3%0.8% Probably support35.5%7.0%16.8%6.3%2.6%2.9% Probably oppose9.3%1.0%0.5%3.2%4.2%0.4% Definitely oppose12.3%0.0%1.3%0.9%9.9%0.1% Not sure7.3%0.6%1.1%2.1%1.0%2.5% As one might expect, the information conveyed in the survey had the greatest impact on individ- uals who either werenÔt sure about how they would vote at the Initial Ballot Test or were tentative in their vote choice (probably yes or probably no). Moreover, Tables 13 and 14 make clear that although the information did impact some voters, it did not do so in a consistent way for all respondents. Some respondents found the information conveyed during the course of the inter- view to be a reason to become more supportive of the measure, whereas others found the same information to be a reason to be less supportive. 6 Despite 19% of respondents making a fundamental shift in their opinion about the sales tax measure over the course of the interview, the net impact is that support for the sales tax mea- sure at the Final Ballot Test was approximately 2% lower than support at the Initial Ballot Test. The results were less favorable for the bond, with 24% of respondents making a fundamental shift in their opinion about the bond measure over the course of the interview, resulting in sup- port for the bond at the Final Ballot Test being 12% lower than support at the Initial Ballot Test. 6.That is, they changed from a position of support, opposition or undecided at the Initial Ballot Test to a differ- ent position at the Final Ballot Test. 36 City of Chula VistaTrue North Research, Inc. © 2015 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 201 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B & D ACKGROUNDEMOGRAPHICS T 15 D S ABLEEMOGRAPHICSOFAMPLES In addition to questions directly related to the Survey Version measures, the study collected basic demo- Sales taxBond graphic information about respondents and Total Respondents400400 Child in Hsld (QD1) their households. Some of this information Yes35.035.3 was gathered during the interview, although No62.762.1 much of it was collected from the voter file. Refused2.32.6 Home Type (QD2) The profiles of the likely November 2016 Single family69.064.1 voter samples used for the sales tax and Apartment9.212.4 Condo / Town- home11.511.6 bond surveys are shown in Table 15. Mobile home4.54.1 Refused5.87.7 Attentiveness to Local Issues (QD3) Very28.323.4 Somewhat44.948.3 Slightly, not at all23.020.4 Refused3.77.9 Household Party Type Single dem20.520.5 Dual dem14.213.3 Single rep10.710.5 Dual rep10.710.2 Other18.018.8 Mixed25.826.9 Party Democrat41.642.3 Republican30.528.9 Other / DTS27.928.8 Registration Year 2015 to 200947.345.6 2008 to 200518.418.7 2004 to 200114.714.3 2000 or before19.621.3 Age 18 to 3926.926.9 40 to 4912.816.3 50 to 6433.927.7 65 or older26.228.8 Refused0.30.3 Homeowner on Voter File Yes70.263.6 No29.836.4 Gender Male50.449.0 Female49.651.0 Likely to Vote by Mail Yes37.637.3 No62.462.7 Likely Jun 2016 Voter Yes43.143.1 No56.956.9 East or West of 805 (Precinct) East55.251.5 West44.848.5 Survey Version Sales tax100.00.0 Bond0.0100.0 37 City of Chula VistaTrue North Research, Inc. © 2015 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 202 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . M ETHODOLOGY The following sections outline the methodology used in the study, as well as the motivation for using certain techniques. QUESTIONNAIRE DEVELOPMENT Dr. McLarney of True North Research worked closely with the City of Chula Vista and TBWB to develop a questionnaire that covered the topics of inter- est and avoided possible sources of systematic measurement error, including position-order effects, wording effects, response-category effects, scaling effects, and priming. Several ques- tions included multiple individual items. Because asking the items in a set order can lead to a systematic position bias in responses, items were asked in random order. Some questions asked in this study were presented only to a subset of respondents. For exam- ple, only respondents who opposed the measure or were undecided at the Initial Ballot Test (Question 3 of the Sales Tax version) were asked a follow-up question regarding the reason they did not support the measure. The questionnaire included with this report (see Questionnaire & Toplines on page 41) identifies the skip patterns used during the interview to ensure that each respondent received the appropriate questions. PROGRAMMING, TRANSLATION & PRE-TEST Prior to fielding the survey, the ques- tionnaire was CATI (Computer Assisted Telephone Interviewing) programmed to assist interview- ers when conducting the telephone interviews. The CATI program automatically navigates skip patterns, randomizes the appropriate question items, and alerts the interviewer to certain types of keypunching mistakes should they happen during the interview. After professionally translat- ing the survey into Spanish, the integrity of the questionnaire was pre-tested internally by True North and by dialing into random homes in the City prior to formally beginning the survey. SPLIT-SAMPLE METHOD The survey was administered to a stratified and clustered ran- dom sample of 800 registered voters in the City of Chula Vista who are likely to participate in the November 2016 election. To reliably estimate support for enacting a sales tax as well as a poten- tial bond measure, a split-sample methodology was employed such that 400 voters were admin- istered a survey that focused on a sales tax, whereas a separate 400 voters were asked questions regarding a potential bond measure. All 800 respondents received general questions that applied to both types of ballot measures. The split-sample approach is used because it is the most reliable method of estimating voter support for alternative tax measures. Prior research, and actual election results, have consis- tently shown that attempting to estimate support for multiple tax measures (e.g., sales tax and bond) with the same respondent during the course of an interview will lead to an artificially low estimate of support for whichever measure is introduced secondÐand it also has a tendency to cause confusion. To avoid these sources of measurement error, it was important that each respondent was asked their opinions regarding one of the funding alternatives, not both. STATISTICAL MARGIN OF ERROR By using the probability-based sampling design noted above, True North ensured that the final samples were representative of voters in the City likely to participate in the November 2016 election. The results of the surveys can thus be used to estimate the opinions of all voters likely to participate in the November 2016 election. 38 City of Chula VistaTrue North Research, Inc. © 2015 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 203 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Because not all voters participated in the study, however, the results have what is known as a sta- tistical margin of error due to sampling. The margin of error refers to the difference between what was found in the survey for a particular question and what would have been found if all likely voters identified in the City had been surveyed for the study. For example, in estimating the percentage of likely November 2016 voters that would definitely support the sales tax measure at the Initial Ballot Test (Question 3 in the survey), the margin of error can be calculated if one knows the size of the population, the size of the sample, a confi- dence level, and the distribution of responses to the question. The appropriate equation for esti- mating the margin of error, in this case, is shown below. óó Nnp 1 p ó –– --------------------------------- pt Nn 1 – p ó Where is the proportion of survey respondents who said definitely yes (0.38 for 38% in this Nn example), is the population size of likely November 2016 voters (78,757), is the sample t 2 size that received the question (400) and is the upper point for the t-distribution with n 1 degrees of freedom (1.96 for a 95% confidence interval). Solving the equation using these – values reveals a margin of error of ± 4.75%. This means that with 38% of survey respondents indicating they would definitely support the sales tax measure at the Initial Ballot Test, we can be 95% confident that the actual percentage of all likely November 2016 voters that would definitely support the sales tax measure is between 33% and 43%. F 17 M M E D S IGUREAXIMUMARGINOFRRORUETOAMPLING 14% 12% 10% Margin of Erro r 8% Sample of 400 Likely Nov 2016 Voters Sample of 800 6% ± 4.89% Likely Nov 2016 Voters ± 3.45% 4% 2% 0% 01002003004005006007008009001000 Sample Size (Number of Respondents) Figure 17 provides a graphic plot of the maximum margin of error in this study. The maximum margin of error for a dichotomous percentage result occurs when the answers are evenly split such that 50% provide one response and 50% provide the alternative. For this study, the maxi- mum margin of error is ± 4.89% for questions pertaining specifically to the sales tax measure or bond measure, and ± 3.45% for questions asked of all 800 survey respondents. 39 City of Chula VistaTrue North Research, Inc. © 2015 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 204 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Within this report, figures and tables show how responses to certain questions varied by sub- groups such as age, gender, and partisan affiliation. Figure 17 is thus useful for understanding how the maximum margin of error for a percentage estimate will grow as the number of individ- uals asked a question (or in a particular subgroup) shrinks. Because the margin of error grows exponentially as the sample size decreases, the reader should use caution when generalizing and interpreting the results for small subgroups. DATA COLLECTION The method of data collection was telephone interviewing. Interviews were conducted during weekday evenings (5:30PM to 9PM) and on weekends (10AM to 5PM) between July 27 and August 5, 2015. It is standard practice not to call during the day on week- days because most working adults are unavailable and thus calling during those hours would bias the sample. The interviews averaged 19 minutes in length. DATA PROCESSING Data processing consisted of checking the data for errors or inconsis- tencies, coding and recoding responses, categorizing verbatim responses, and preparing fre- quency analyses and crosstabulations. ROUNDING Numbers that end in 0.5 or higher are rounded up to the nearest whole num- ber, whereas numbers that end in 0.4 or lower are rounded down to the nearest whole number. These same rounding rules are also applied, when needed, to arrive at numbers that include a decimal place in constructing figures and charts. Occasionally, these rounding rules lead to small discrepancies in the first decimal place when comparing tables and pie charts for a given question. 40 City of Chula VistaTrue North Research, Inc. © 2015 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 205 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Q & T UESTIONNAIREOPLINES City of Chula Vista Bond & Sales Tax Survey Final Toplines August 2015 Section 1: Introduction to Study If needed: If needed: The survey should take about 12 minutes to complete. If needed: If now is not a convenient time, can you let me know a better time so I can call back? If the person asks why you need to speak to the listed person or if they ask to participate instead, explain: For statistical purposes, at this time the survey must only be completed by this particular individual. If the person says he/she is an elected official or is somehow associated with the survey, politely explain that this survey is designed to measure the opinions of those not closely associated with the study, thank the person for their time, and terminate the interview. Section 2: Importance of Issues please tell me how important you feel the issue is to you, using a scale of extremely important, very important, somewhat important or not at all important. Q1 Here is the (first/next) issue: _____. Do you think this issue is extremely important, very important, somewhat important, or not at all important? Somewhat Extremely Important Important Important Important Not at all Not sure Refused Very Randomize Maintaining the quality of education in local A 53% 36% 6% 3% 1% 0% schools Maintaining the quality of city services, B 30% 46% 20% 2% 1% 0% facilities and infrastructure Creating jobs and improving the local C 43% 48% 7% 2% 0% 0% economy D Preventing local tax increases 27% 41% 24% 7% 1% 0% E Improving local property values 22% 39% 30% 7% 1% 1% F Protecting the environment 35% 43% 17% 4% 1% 0% G Improving public safety 36% 45% 15% 2% 1% 0% H Reducing traffic congestion 24% 38% 32% 6% 1% 0% I Protecting the supply of water 52% 41% 5% 1% 1% 0% True North Research, Inc. © 2015 Page 1 41 City of Chula VistaTrue North Research, Inc. © 2015 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 206 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chula Vista Bond & Sales Tax Survey August 2015 What would you say is the biggest issue facing your neighborhood that you would like Q2the City to address? Verbatim responses recorded and later grouped into categories shown below. Improving streets, roads 16% Improving public safety 16% No issues, everything is okay 12% Addressing drought, water issues 9% Not sure, cannot think of any 9% Reducing traffic congestion 8% Improving education 7% Improving local jobs, economy 7% Limiting growth, development 4% Providing more affordable housing 3% Improving environmental efforts 3% Addressing homeless issue 2% Reducing taxes 2% Addressing illegal immigration issues 2% Enforcing laws 2% Addressing parking issues 1% Improving government, leadership 1% Improving public transportation 1% True North Research, Inc. © 2015 Page 2 42 City of Chula VistaTrue North Research, Inc. © 2015 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 207 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chula Vista Bond & Sales Tax Survey August 2015 Section 3: Initial Ballot Tests Your household is within the City of Chula (Chew-la) Vista. Next year, voters in the city may be asked to vote on a local ballot measure. Let me read you a summary of the measure. Split Sample. Only Sample A (sales tax) gets Q3 & Q4. To provide adequate funding for essential city projects and services, including: drains and communications to ensure reliable response Q3 Shall the City of Chula Vista enact a one-half cent sales tax for a period not to exceed five years, with independent citizen oversight, annual reports to the community, and all money used to improve Chula Vista? If the election were held today, would you vote yes or no on this measure? Get answer, then ask: Would that be definitely (yes/no) or probably (yes/no)? 1 Definitely yes 38% Skip to Q7 2 Probably yes 32% Skip to Q7 3 Probably no 7% Ask Q4 4 Definitely no 16% Ask Q4 98 Not sure 7% Ask Q4 99 Refused 2% Skip to Q7 Is there a particular reason why you do not support the measure I just described? If Q4 yes, ask: Please briefly describe your reason. Verbatim responses recorded and later grouped into categories shown below. Taxes already too high 52% Money will be mismanaged, misspent 31% Measure will be ineffective, no 12% improvements Not sure, no particular reason 9% Need more information 7% Measure trying accomplish too much 5% True North Research, Inc. © 2015 Page 3 43 City of Chula VistaTrue North Research, Inc. © 2015 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 208 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chula Vista Bond & Sales Tax Survey August 2015 Split Sample. Only Sample B (bond) gets Q5 & Q6. To provide adequate funding for essential city projects and improvements, including: drains and communications to ensure reliable response Q5 Shall the City of Chula Vista issue million dollars in bonds, with independent citizen oversight, annual reports to the community, and all money used to improve Chula Vista? If the election were held today, would you vote yes or no on this measure? Get answer, then ask: Would that be definitely (yes/no) or probably (yes/no)? 1 Definitely yes 36% Skip to Q7 2 Probably yes 36% Skip to Q7 3 Probably no 9% Ask Q6 4 Definitely no 12% Ask Q6 98 Not sure 7% Ask Q6 99 Refused 1% Skip to Q7 Is there a particular reason why you do not support the measure I just described? If Q6 yes, ask: Please briefly describe your reason. Verbatim responses recorded and later grouped into categories shown below. Taxes already too high 36% Money will be mismanaged, misspent 25% Need more information 24% Not sure, no particular reason 15% Other higher priorities in community 8% Measure will be ineffective, no 6% improvements Measure trying to accomplish too much 4% True North Research, Inc. © 2015 Page 4 44 City of Chula VistaTrue North Research, Inc. © 2015 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 209 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chula Vista Bond & Sales Tax Survey August 2015 Section 4: Tax Threshold Split Sample. Only Sample A (sales tax) gets Q7. Only ask Q7 if Q5 = (2,3,4,98,99). What if the measure I just described raised the sales tax by a lower amount: Q7 cent instead of cent? Would you vote yes or no on the measure? Get answer, then ask: Would that be definitely (yes/no) or probably (yes/no)? Definitely yes at half-cent (Q5) 38% 1 Definitely yes 8% 2 Probably yes 21% 3 Probably no 7% 4 Definitely no 20% 98 Not sure 6% 99 Refused 0% Split Sample. Only Sample B (bond) gets Q8 & Q9. The amount home owners will pay if the bond passes depends on the assessed value of property taxes on your home would increase: _____ per 100,000 (one hundred Q8thousand) dollars of assessed valuation, would you vote yes or no on the bond measure? Get answer, then ask: Is that definitely (yes/no) or probably (yes/no)? If needed: The assessed value of your home is listed on your property tax bill. Read in sequence starting with the highest amount (A), then the next highest (B), and so on. go to next question. Prefer not to answer Definitely Definitely Probably Probably Not Sure Yes Yes No No Ask in Order A $57 17%17% 21% 36% 9% 1% B $46 22%20% 17% 34% 6% 1% C $34 26%22% 17% 29% 5% 1% D $28 30%20% 16% 29% 4% 1% Let me put it another way: If you knew that this measure would cost the typical home Q9 owner about $ per year, would you vote yes or no on the bond measure? Get answer, then ask: Is that definitely (yes/no) or probably (yes/no)? 1 Definitely yes 22% 2 Probably yes 22% 3 Probably no 16% 4 Definitely no 35% 98 Not sure 5% 99 Refused 1% True North Research, Inc. © 2015 Page 5 45 City of Chula VistaTrue North Research, Inc. © 2015 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 210 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chula Vista Bond & Sales Tax Survey August 2015 Section 6: Programs & Projects improvements. Q10 If the measure passes, would you favor or oppose using some of the money to: _____, or do you not have an opinion? Get answer, if favor or oppose, then ask: Would that be strongly (favor/oppose) or somewhat (favor/oppose)? Somewhat Somewhat Not sure Strongly Strongly Refused Oppose Oppose Favor Favor Randomize. Split Sample A1 & A2, D1 & D2, F1 & F2 using odd/even clusters. A1 Pave, maintain and repair city streets 53% 28% 3% 6% 10% 1% Pave, maintain and repair city streets and fix A2 54% 27% 3% 8% 8% 0% potholes B Repair broken sidewalks, curbs and gutters 48% 30% 6% 8% 9% 0% Repair or replace failing storm drain pipes C 49% 29% 5% 7% 9% 1% that can create sink holes in city streets Upgrade aging police, fire and 9-1-1 D1 emergency response facilities, equipment and 56% 22% 5% 8% 9% 0% communications to ensure reliable response Replace aging police, fire and public safety D2 44% 24% 8% 10% 14% 0% vehicles to ensure reliable response Make essential repairs to older libraries, recreation centers and fire stations, including E 45% 29% 5% 9% 12% 0% replacing leaky roofs, failing plumbing, and faulty electrical systems Maintain parks and recreation facilities F1 including courts, fields, pools and 47% 30% 6% 7% 10% 0% playgrounds F2 Maintain safe and clean parks 45% 30% 4% 9% 11% 0% G Improve wildfire response and prevention 50% 27% 3% 8% 11% 1% H 55% 23% 5% 6% 11% 0% systems to conserve drinking water Retrofit storm drains to capture trash and I 50% 29% 4% 6% 10% 1% reduce water pollution Provide the infrastructure needed to attract a J 42% 20% 9% 16% 12% 0% four-year University to Chula Vista K Maintain public libraries and technology 40% 32% 5% 10% 13% 0% Remove asbestos, lead paint, and other L hazards from older libraries, recreation 39% 26% 9% 11% 15% 0% centers and fire stations Only Sample A (sales tax) receives item M. M Remove graffiti faster 34% 25% 7% 13% 18% 3% True North Research, Inc. © 2015 Page 6 46 City of Chula VistaTrue North Research, Inc. © 2015 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 211 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chula Vista Bond & Sales Tax Survey August 2015 Section 7: Positive Arguments discussing. Supporters of the measure will say: _____. Do you think this is a very convincing, Q11 somewhat convincing, or not at all convincing reason to the measure? Convincing Convincing Convincing Somewhat Not At All Know/No Refused Opinion Very Randomize All respondents receive items A-L. All money raised by the measure will be used to fund essential city projects and A 37% 37% 23% 0% 2% 0% taken away by the State or used for other purposes. There will be a clear system of accountability including independent citizen oversight and B 40% 36% 21% 1% 2% 0% annual reports to the community to ensure that the money is spent properly. By keeping our city safe, clean and well- C maintained, this measure will help protect our 40% 41% 17% 0% 2% 0% quality of life and our property values. This measure will allow the City to keep up with basic repairs and maintenance to streets, D 44% 37% 17% 0% 2% 0% take care of it now, it will be a lot more expensive to repair in the future. When you have an emergency, you need help fast. Minutes count in these situations. This measure will ensure that our police and E 49% 35% 14% 0% 1% 0% firefighters have the vehicles and life-saving equipment they need to respond quickly to 9- 1-1 emergencies. more than 50 years old. We need to start replacing and repairing the system before F 46% 36% 16% 0% 2% 0% pipes begin collapsing and create sink holes, flooding, pollution, and millions of dollars in property damage. This measure will help attract a four-year University to Chula Vista, which will provide G local residents with affordable access to the 34% 33% 31% 0% 2% 0% education and training needed to succeed in The City has made smart financial decisions, H refinancing past bonds to save taxpayers 23% 43% 28% 0% 5% 0% millions of dollars. True North Research, Inc. © 2015 Page 7 47 City of Chula VistaTrue North Research, Inc. © 2015 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 212 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chula Vista Bond & Sales Tax Survey August 2015 Improving our local streets, sidewalks, and essential infrastructure will help improve the I 35% 39% 25% 0% 1% 0% local economy and attract new businesses and jobs to Chula Vista. Parks and recreation centers help keep kids J healthy, active, and away from drugs, gangs 40% 35% 23% 0% 2% 0% and crime. We are facing the worst drought in California history, and the price of water is going to K keep going up. This measure will help the 42% 34% 22% 0% 2% 0% City save money and conserve water by upgrading irrigation and drainage systems. The resources, technology and services at our local libraries are essential for returning L 32% 42% 24% 0% 2% 0% Veterans and other Chula Vista residents who are trying to find jobs. Only Sample A (sales tax) receives items M & N. A substantial amount of the money raised by the sales tax will come from non-residents who visit our community. This measure will M 36% 38% 25% 1% 1% 0% make sure they pay their fair share for the facilities and services they use while in our city. The tax will be for a limited duration and N 37% 32% 30% 0% 1% 0% approval. Only Sample B (bond) receives item O. The money raised by the bond can only be spent on the specific projects and O 40% 35% 24% 0% 1% 0% improvements listed in the measure. It can NOT be diverted to other uses. True North Research, Inc. © 2015 Page 8 48 City of Chula VistaTrue North Research, Inc. © 2015 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 213 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chula Vista Bond & Sales Tax Survey August 2015 Section 8: Interim Ballot Tests Sometimes people change their minds about a measure once they have more information about it. Now that you have heard a bit more about the measure, let me read you a summary of it again. Split Sample. Only Sample A (sales tax) gets Q12. To provide adequate funding for essential city projects and services, including: drains and communications to ensure reliable response Q12 Shall the City of Chula Vista enact a one-half cent sales tax for a period not to exceed five years, with independent citizen oversight, annual reports to the community, and all money used to improve Chula Vista? If the election were held today, would you vote yes or no on this measure? Get answer, then ask: Would that be definitely (yes/no) or probably (yes/no)? 1 Definitely yes 39% 2 Probably yes 30% 3 Probably no 10% 4 Definitely no 17% 98 Not sure 4% 99 Refused 0% Split Sample. Only Sample B (bond) gets Q13. To provide adequate funding for essential city projects and improvements, including: drains and communications to ensure reliable response Q13 Shall the City of Chula Vista issue million dollars in bonds, with independent citizen oversight, annual reports to the community, and all money used to improve Chula Vista? If the election were held today, would you vote yes or no on this measure? Get answer, then ask: Would that be definitely (yes/no) or probably (yes/no)? 1 Definitely yes 34% 2 Probably yes 30% 3 Probably no 11% 4 Definitely no 16% 98 Not sure 8% 99 Refused 1% True North Research, Inc. © 2015 Page 9 49 City of Chula VistaTrue North Research, Inc. © 2015 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 214 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chula Vista Bond & Sales Tax Survey August 2015 Section 9: Negative Arguments Next, let me tell you what opponents of the measure will say. Opponents of the measure will say: _____. Do you think this is a very convincing, Q14 somewhat convincing, or not at all convincing reason to OPPOSE the measure? Convincing Convincing Convincing Somewhat Not At All Know/No Refused Opinion Very Randomize People are having a hard time making ends meet with high unemployment and a sluggish A 35% 34% 30% 0% 1% 0% economy. Now is NOT the time to be raising taxes. Raising taxes will hurt our local businesses B 25% 41% 31% 0% 3% 0% and our local economy. This tax will hurt seniors and others on fixed- C 34% 37% 25% 0% 3% 0% incomes. D mismanage the money or spend it on their 27% 40% 31% 0% 2% 0% own pet projects. Split Sample. Only Sample A (sales tax) gets item E. The State of California just raised the sales tax a couple years ago. Now the City also E 27% 36% 35% 0% 3% 0% taxpayers. Split Sample. Only Sample B (bond) gets item F. Taxpayers will be paying for this bond for the F 35% 34% 26% 0% 5% 0% next 30 years. That is too much debt. True North Research, Inc. © 2015 Page 10 50 City of Chula VistaTrue North Research, Inc. © 2015 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 215 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chula Vista Bond & Sales Tax Survey August 2015 Section 10: Final Ballot Tests Now that you have heard a bit more about the measure, let me read you a summary of it one more time. Split Sample. Only Sample A (sales tax) gets Q15. To provide adequate funding for essential city projects and services, including: drains and communications to ensure reliable response Q15 Shall the City of Chula Vista enact a one-half cent sales tax for a period not to exceed five years, with independent citizen oversight, annual reports to the community, and all money used to improve Chula Vista? If the election were held today, would you vote yes or no on this measure? Get answer, then ask: Would that be definitely (yes/no) or probably (yes/no)? 1 Definitely yes 37% 2 Probably yes 30% 3 Probably no 8% 4 Definitely no 20% 98 Not sure 4% 99 Refused 0% Split Sample. Only Sample B (bond) gets Q16. To provide adequate funding for essential city projects and improvements, including: drains and communications to ensure reliable response Q16 Shall the City of Chula Vista issue million dollars in bonds, with independent citizen oversight, annual reports to the community, and all money used to improve Chula Vista? If the election were held today, would you vote yes or no on this measure? Get answer, then ask: Would that be definitely (yes/no) or probably (yes/no)? 1 Definitely yes 32% 2 Probably yes 28% 3 Probably no 14% 4 Definitely no 20% 98 Not sure 5% 99 Refused 2% True North Research, Inc. © 2015 Page 11 51 City of Chula VistaTrue North Research, Inc. © 2015 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 216 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chula Vista Bond & Sales Tax Survey August 2015 Section 10: Background & Demographics Thank you so much for your participation. I have just a few background questions for statistical purposes. D1Do you have children under the age of 18 living in your household? 1 Yes 35% 2 No 62% 99 Refused 2% D2Which of the following best describes your current home? 1 Single family detached home 67% 2 Apartment 11% 3 Condominium 7% 4 Townhome 5% 5 Mobile home 4% 99 Refused 7% How much attention do you pay to the issues, decisions and activities of your City D3government? Would you say that you are very attentive, somewhat attentive, slightly attentive, or not at all attentive? 1 Very attentive 26% 2 Somewhat attentive 47% 3 Slightly attentive 13% 4 Not at all attentive 8% 98 Not sure 0% 99 Refused 5% Those are all of the questions that I have for you. Thanks so much for participating in this important survey. Post-Interview & Sample Items S1Gender 1 Male 50% 2 Female 50% True North Research, Inc. © 2015 Page 12 52 City of Chula VistaTrue North Research, Inc. © 2015 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 217 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chula Vista Bond & Sales Tax Survey August 2015 S2Party 1 Democrat 42% 2 Republican 30% 3 Other 6% 4 DTS 22% S3Age on Voter File 1 18 to 29 13% 2 30 to 39 14% 3 40 to 49 15% 4 50 to 64 31% 5 65 or older 28% 99 Not coded 0% S4Registration Date 1 2015 to 2009 46% 2 2008 to 2005 19% 3 2004 to 2001 14% 4 2000 to 1997 6% 5 Before 1990 14% S5Household Party Type 1 Single Dem 21% 2 Dual Dem 14% 3 Single Rep 11% 4 Dual Rep 10% 5 Single Other 15% 6 Dual Other 4% 7 Dem & Rep 4% 8 Dem & Other 12% 9 Rep & Other 8% 0 Mixed (Dem + Rep + Other) 2% True North Research, Inc. © 2015 Page 13 53 City of Chula VistaTrue North Research, Inc. © 2015 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 218 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chula Vista Bond & Sales Tax Survey August 2015 S6Homeowner on Voter File 1 Yes 67% 2 No 33% S7Likely to Vote by Mail 1 Yes 37% 2 No 63% S8Likely June 2016 1 Yes 43% 2 No 57% S9Likely November 2016 1 Yes 100% 2 No 0% S10East or West of 805 (Precinct) 2 East 53% 1 West 47% S11Survey Version 1 Sales tax 50% 2 Bond 50% True North Research, Inc. © 2015 Page 14 54 City of Chula VistaTrue North Research, Inc. © 2015 ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 219 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . City of Chula Vista Staff Report File#:15-0551, Item#: 9. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE DIRECTION TO STAFF REGARDING HOMELESSNESS ISSUES RECOMMENDED ACTION Council discuss and provide any direction to staff. City of Chula VistaPage 1 of 1Printed on 10/8/2015 powered by Legistar™ ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 220 City of Chula Vista Staff Report File#:15-0567, Item#: 10. COUNCILMEMBER MIESEN RESOLUTIONOFTHECITYCOUNCILOFTHECITYOFCHULAVISTAOPPOSINGTHECITY OFSANDIEGO’SUNITARYRATEALTERNATIVEFORRECYCLEDWATERSERVICEINFAVOR OF A ZONAL RATE Councilmember Recommendation: Council adopt the resolution. City of Chula VistaPage 1 of 1Printed on 10/8/2015 powered by Legistar™ ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 221 RESOLUTION NO. _________ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA OPPOSINGTHE CITY OF SAN DIEGO’S UNITARY RATE ALTERNATIVEFOR RECYCLED WATER SERVICEIN FAVOR OF A ZONAL RATE WHEREAS, the City of Chula Vista is a member of the Metropolitan Wastewater Joint Powers Authorityand has been very active in promotion and use of reclaimed water for many years; and WHEREAS, the City of Chula is aleader among municipalities working towards sustainable and resilient policies and practices; and WHEREAS, the City of Chula Vista is a strong proponent for the City of San Diego’s Pure Water Program which will treat wastewater for potable reuse; and WHEREAS, the City of Chula Vista supports an equitable distribution of costs for all participants inwater reclamation programs; and WHEREAS,the City of San Diego (“San Diego”) has provided Public Notice of two alternative rate structures being consideredfor the Otay Water Districtfor thepurchaseofrecycled water from San Diego’s South Bay Recycled Water Reclamation Plant; and WHEREAS, as a customer of the Otay Water District, the City of Chula Vista purchases recycled water which it uses to irrigate parks, common areas,and open spacein the city; and WHEREAS, San Diego’s proposed unitary rate structure would inequitably charge$1.2 million in annual costs mostly to Chula Vista’s recycled and potable water customers, in effect, taking money from Chula Vista ratepayers to support San Diego’sNorth City’s distribution system,totaling $7.2 million over six years; and WHEREAS, San Diego’s South Bay Recycled Water Reclamation Plant is completely separate from its treatment plant serving the North City,and San Diego has virtually no distribution system in the South Bay; and WHEREAS, the unitary rate structure proposed by San Diego attempts to combine the costs of two separately-owned systemsinto one rate, which violates a basic tenet of rate setting and is not equitable because it would have Chula Vista customers paying forthe costsofaNorth City system they do not use; and WHEREAS, the rate charged to the North should notto be linked towhat is charged in the South; and WHEREAS, the current rate for recycled waterprovided by the San Diego South plantto Otay Water is $0.80 hcf, andthe proposed unitary rate would increaseover 216%to the rate for recycled water to $1.73hcf and would be an inequitable rate; and WHEREAS, The Cost of Service Study dated August 5, 2015 prepared by San Diego also considers azonalrate of $1.17 hcf for the South Bay that does not include the North City water distribution costsand therefore, would be a more equitable rateto charge Otay Water District; and WHEREAS, The zonal rate would increase the current rateof recycled waterfrom$.80 hcf to $1.17 hcf which represents a substantial increase of 147% to San Diego and would be an equitable ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 222 increase forthe cost of producingrecycled waterat San Diego’s South Bay TreatmentPlant based upon the San Diego Cost of Service Study; and WHEREAS, a more equitable rate structureis azonal ratethat that isbased on cost-of-service. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista as follows: 1.On behalf of the people of Chula Vista the City Council does hereby opposethe City of San Diego’sproposedunitary rate structure for recycled water customersin the South Bay. 2.The City Council urges the City of San Diego instead to support a zonal rate structure, based on the cost of providing recycled water service to the South Bay. Presented byApproved as to form by __________________________________________________________ City Councilmember Steve MiesenGlen R. Googins, City Attorney ΑΏΐΔȃΐΏȃΐΒ !¦¤­£  Packet0 ¦¤ 223