HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 2015-203 RESOLUTION NO. Z01�-203
RESOLUTION OF THE CITl' COUi�'CIL OF THE CITY OF
CHLTL.A \'ISTA URGIt�'G THE STATE TO PROVIDE NE«'
SUSTAINABLE F[J?�'DIi`'G FOR STATE ANND LOCAL
TRA?�'SPORTATION II�'FRASTRliCTURE
W-HEREAS. Govemor Edmund G. Bro�n. Jr. has called an extraordinan� session ro
address the immense underfunding of Califomia's transportation infrastructure; and
V�'HEREAS. cities and counties oti�n and operate more than 81 percent of streets and
roads in Califomia, and from the moment �+-e open our front door to dri��e to ���ork, bike to
school, or ��alk to the bus station, people aze dependent upon a safe, reliable local transportation
net���ork_ and
V�'HEREAS, the Cit}� of Chula Vista has participated in efforts �°ith the Califomia State
Association of Counties, Leaeue of California Cities, and Califomia's Reeional Transportation
Plannine Aeencies to stud}� unmet fundine needs for local roads and bridges, including side���alks
and other essential components; and
WI-IEREAS; the resulting 2014 Califomia State«ide Local Streets and Roads \eeds
Assessment. N�hich pro�ides critical analvsis and information on the local transportation
nenvork's condition and fundins needs: indicates that the condition of the local transportation
nen��ork is deteriorating as predicted in the initial 2008 stud.; and
��'HEREAS, the results show that Califomia's local streets and roads are on a path of
significant decline. On a scale of zero (failed) to ]00 (e�cellent). the state��ide a��eraoe pavement
condition indeY (PCI) is 66, placine it in the "at risk' categorv ���here pa��ements H�ill begin to
deteriorate much more rapidh� and require rehabilitation or rebuildine rather than more cost-
effective preventative maintenance if funding is not increased: and
�l%HEREAS. the results sho�v that the Citv of Chula Vista`s local streeu have an averaee
Pa��ement Condition Index (PCI) of 71. placino it just abo�e the "at risk" categon�: and �
WHEREAS_ if funding remains at the current levels. in ]0 }�ears, 2� percent of local
streets and roads in Califomia ���ill be in "failed" condition: and
\�%HEREAS, cities and counties need an additional �1.7 billion just to maintain a status
quo pa��ement condition of 66, and much more revenue to operate the s��stem �+-ith Best
Manaeement Practices. �vhich �vould reduce the total amount of fundins needed for maintenance
in the furure: and �
VIHEREAS. models show� that an additional $3 billion annual in��estment in the ]ocal
streets and roads s��stem is eapected to improve pavement conditions statewide from an averase
"at risk` condition to an averaee "eood° condition: and �
Resolution No. 201�-203
Page No. 2
V�%HEREAS; if additional funding isn`t secured now, it will cost tvtpa}�ers twice as much
to fix the loca] s}�stem in the future; as failure to act this year will increase unmet funding needs
for local transportation facilities by $11 billion in five years and $21 billion in ten years; and
WHEREAS, modemizing the local street and road system provides well-payine
construction jobs and boosts local economies; and
WHEREAS, the local street and road system is also critical for farm to market needs,
inter-connectivitv, multi-modal needs. and commerce: and
WHEREAS; police, fire, and emergency medical semices all need safe reliable roads to
react quickly to emergency calls and a few minutes of delay can be a matter of life and death;
and
WHEREAS, maintaining and preserving the local street and road system in good
condition will reduce drive times and traffic congestion, improve bicycle safety, and make the
pedestrian experience safer and more appealing, which ]eads to reduce vehicle emissions helpina
the State achieve its air quality and greenhouse gas emissions reductions goals; and
WHEREAS, restoring roads before they fai] also reduces construction time which results
in less air pollution from heavy equipment and less water pollution from site run-off; and
WHEREAS, in addition to the local system, tl�e state highway system needs an additional
$SJ billion annually to address the state's deferred maintenance; and
WHEREAS, in order to bring the local system back into a cost-effective condition, at
least $73 billion annually in new money going directly to cities and counties.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula
Vista strongly urees the Govemor and Legislature to identity a sufficient and stable funding
source for local street and road and state highway maintenance and rehabilitation to ensure the
safe and efficient mobilih� ofthe traveling public and the economic vitality of California.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Chula Vista stronel}� urges the Governor
and Legislature to adopt the following priorities for funding California's streets and roads.
1. Make a si�nificant investment in transportation infrastructure. Any package should seek
to raise at least �6 billion annuall�� and should remain in place for at least ]0 years or until an
alternative method of fundins our transportation system is agreed upon.
2. Focus on maintainine and rehabilitatine the current system. Repairing California's streets
and hiehways involves much more than fixing potl�oles. It requires major road pavement
overlays, fixing unsafe bridges; pro��iding safe access for bicyclists and pedestrians, replacing
storm water culverts, as N�el] as operational improvements that necessitate the construction of
auxiliary lanes to relieve traffic congestion choke points,and fixing design deficiencies that have
created unsafe mer�ing and other traffic hazards. Efforts to supply funding for transit in addition
to funding for roads should also focus on fiaing the system first.
Resolution No. ZOl�-203
Pase?��o. 3
3. Equal split beri��een state and local projects. A'e suppon sharine revenue for road��a.�
maintenance equallv (50/�0) betti�een the state and cities and counties. given the equaih�-pressine
fundino needs of both systems. as well as the ]on�standing historical precedent for collectine
transportation user fees through a centralized s.�stem and sharine the re��enues across the entire
nen��ork through direct sub��entions. Ensurine that funding to local eovemments is pro��ided
directiv, without intermediaries, will accelerate project deliven��and ensure ma�imum
accountabilitv.
4. Raise re��enues across a broad ranee of options. Reseazch b�� the Califomia Alliance for
Jobs and Transportation Califomia sho���s that �oters stronglv support increased fundine for
transportation improvements. The}� are much more open to a packaee that spreads potential ta�
or fee increases across a broad ranse of options: indudins fuel takes, license fees; and
re�istration fees, rather than just one source. Additionallv; an�� packaee should move Califomia
to���ard an all-users pav structure, in �vhich e��ervone ��ho benefits from the s��stem contributes to
maintainine it — from traditional gasoline-fueled vehicles, to ne��� h}�brids or electric ��ehicles, to
commercial vehides.
�. [n��est a portion of diesel ta� and/or cap R trade re��enue to high-priority goods
movement projects. While the focus of a transportation fundine packaee should be on
maintaining and rehabilitating the esisting s�-stem, Califomia has a critical need to upgrade the
goods movement infrastructure that is essential to our economic well-beina. Establishine a
frameN�ork ro mal:e appropriate im�estments in major eoods movement arteries can la�� the
ground�vork for greater im�estments in the future that ��ill also impro��e air quality and reduce
ereenhouse eas emissions.
6. Svong accountabilit}� requirements to protect the ta�payers' im�estment. Voters and
tatpa}�ers must be assured that all transportation re��enues aze spent responsibl��. Local
govemments are accustomed to emplo��ine transparent processes for selectine road maintenance
projects aided by pavement management s}�stems: as w�ell as reponing on the e�penditure of
transportation funds throuah the State Controller s Local Streets and Roads Annual Repon.
7. Provide Consistent Annual Fundine Le��els. Under current statute. the annual gas ta�c
adjustment bv the Boazd of Equalization is creating extreme fluctuations in fundine levels — a
�900 million drop in this budget vear alone. .A transportation fundine packaee should contain
legislation that N�ill create more consistent revenue projections and alloN� Caltrans and
transportation agencies the certainrv thev need for lonRer term plannine.
Presented b}� Appro��ed as to form b��
_
' _.�� / � /
Richard . Ho 1•' s C{+len R. Go eins
Director of P lic Works .� Atto ai•
Resolution No. 201�-203
Pa�e No. 4
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED by the Ciry Council of the City of Chula Vista;
Califomia, this 18th day of August 2015 by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers: Aguilar, Bensoussan, McCann, Miesen and Salas
NAYS: Councilmembers: None
ABSENT: Councilmembers: None
Mary S as, Mayor
ATTEST:
/
Donna R. Norris, CMCT, Crty Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO )
CITY OF CHULA VISTA )
I, Donna R. Norris, City Clerk of Chula Visfa, California, do hereby certify that the foregoi�g
Resolution No. 2015-203 was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council at a
regular meeting of the Chula Vista City Council held on the 18th day of August 2015.
Executed this 18th day of August 2015.
�.�
Donna R. Norris, CMC; Cit�� Clerk