HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015-07-21 Agenda Packet [declue imder pendry of perjury that I un employed
by the Ciry of Chula Ysu in the office of the Ciry Clerk
tnd tml I pated the doamtdn�cwrding to B[vwn Att
��• I
D.ud: � l"1 l5 $�, t,i,e
�
� CHUTA VISfA
� �°���.�i��.(/
�
Mary Casillas Salas, Mayor
PaViaa Aguilar, Councilmember Gary Halbert, City Manager
Pamela Bensoussan, Counalmember Glen R. Googins, City Attomey
John McCann, Counalmember ponna R. Norris, City CleMc
Steve Miesen, Councilmember
Tuesday, July 21, 2015 5:00 PM Council Chambers
276 4th Avenue, Building A
Chula�sta, CA 91970
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL:
Councilmembers Aguilar. Bensoussan, McCann, Miesen and Mayor Salas
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG AND MOMENT OF SILENCE
SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY
A. 15-0372 EMPLOYEE SERVICE RECOGNITION HONORING STAFF
WITH MILESTONE SERVICE ANNIVERSARIES
B. 15-0416 PRESENTATION BY SOUTH COUNTY ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL PRESIDENT AND CEO, CINDY
GOMPPER-GRAVES ON SOUTH COUNTY'S VISION
CONSENT CALENDAR (Itema 1 -6)
The Counci! will enact the Consenf Calendar staff �ecommendations by one motion, wi[hout
discussion, unless a Councilmember, a member of the public, or staff requests that an item
be removed for discussion. H yrou wish to speak on one of these items, please fi!! out a
'Request to Speak" form (available in the lob6y) and submit it to the Crty Clerk pnor to the
meeting. Items puUed /rom the Consent Calendar wiU be discussed immediately /ollowing
the Consent Calendar.
crry o�Cnur ww r.y.t rnMSe o��n vm+s
City Council Agenda July 21,2015
1. 15-0421 APPROVAL OF MINUTES of June 16, 2015.
smna�omme�eano�: Council approve the minutes.
2. 15-0413 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING
CHAPTER 19.02 OF THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL
CODE BY ADDING SECTION 19.02.060 RELATED TO
' INDEMNITY PROVISIONS FOR CITY ISSUED PERMITS
(SECOND READING AND ADOPTION)
oepartmem: City AttOmey
smna�omme�eatio�: Council adopt the ordinance.
3. 15-0414 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING
THE SALT CREEK SEWER BASIN DEVELOPMENT
IMPACT FEE (SECOND READING AND ADOPTION)
oe�.v�e�r Public Works Department
smeaecomme�dauo�: Council adopt the ordinance.
4. 15-0352 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR
� PROVIDING SEWER MANHOLE INSPECTION AND
EVALUATION SERVICES TO PROFESSIONAL PIPE
SERVICES
oe�ml,e�r Public Works Department
smaa�omme�eano,,: Council adopt the resolution.
5. 15-0289 A. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA AMENDING THE COMPENSATION
SCHEDULE AND CLASSIFICATION PLAN TO REFLECT
THE ADDITION AND REMOVAL OF VARIOUS POSITION
TITLES, AMENDING THE AUTHORIZED POSITION
COUNT IN VARIOUS DEPARTMENTS WITH NO NET
CHANGE IN AUTHORIZED STAFFING, AND
APPROPRIATING FUNDS THEREFOR (4/5 VOTE
REQUIRED)
B. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE REVISED FISCAL YEAR
2015-2016 COMPENSATION SCHEDULE AS REQUIRED
BY CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, TITLE 2,
SECTION 570.5
Clry of ChWa Vista Paga 2 Pnnied on 7HYL073
City Council Agenda July 21,2015
C. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
AMENDING CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION
2.05.010 RELATING TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF
UNCLASSIFIED POSITIONS TO ADD FA IVDC-LECC
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, FA FINANCIAL MANAGER AND
FA SENIOR FINANCIAL ANALYST AND DELETE CBAG
IV-LECC DIRECTOR (FIRST READING) (4/5 VOTE
REQUIRED)
oe�rtme�z: City Attorney 8 Human Resources
SbflRecommendation: COUf1CII adopt the resolutions and place the ordinance on first
reading.
6. 15-0389 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA WAIVING THE COMPETITIVE FORMAL BID
REQUIREMENT AND APPROVING AN AGREEMENT WITH
HARRELL AND COMPANY ADVISORS, LLC TO PROVIDE
FINANCIAL ADVISORY SERVICES
oe�m�,em: Finance Department
saeR�omme�aauo�: Council adopt the resolution.
ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Persons speaking during Public Comments may address the Council on any subject matter
within the Council's junsdiction that is not listed as an item on the agenda. State law
generally prohi6its the Council from discussing or taking action on any issue not included
on the agenda, but. if appropriate, the Council may schedule the topic for future discussion
or refer the matter to staff Comments are limited to three minutes.
CITY MANAGER'S REPORTS
MAYOR'S REPORTS
7. 15-0423 A. Consideration of ratification of reappointments to the
following boards and commissions:
REAPPOINTMENTS TO FIRST TERM (initial term less than
2 years)
Brent Livingston Board of Ethics
Rosa Robles Board of Ethics
I
Ciryo/Chula V'uta Page J Pnntatl on 7HYL075
City Council Agenda July 21,2015
REAPPOINTMENTS TO SECOND TERM
Pedro Anaya Planning Commission `
Yolanda Calvo Planning Commission
Eric Mosolgo Growth Mgmt Oversight Commission
Felicia Starr Civil Service Commission
B. Consideration of referral to the Charter Review
Commission to consider modifying term limit requirements.
COUNCILMEMBERS' COMMENTS
8. 15-0419 Councilmember Miesen:
Ratification of appointment of Vlady Dmytrenko to the
Mobilehome Rent Review Commission.
ADJOURNMENT
to the Regular City Council Meeting on July 28, 2015, at 5.00 p.m., in the Council
Chambers.
Matenals provided to the City Council related to any open-session item on this agenda are available
(o�public review at the City Clerk's Office, located in City Hall at 276 Fourth Avenue, Building A,
during no�mal business hours.
In compliance with the
AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT
The City o/Chula Vista requests individuals who require special accommodations to access, attend,
and/or paRicipate in a City meeting, activity, or service, contact the Cdy Clerk's O�ce at(619)
691-5041(Cali(omia Relay Service is available for the hearing impaired by dialing 711) at least
foity-eight hours in advance of the meeting.
Chula Vista City Council meetings, including public comments; are video recorded and aired live on
AT&T U-verse channel 99(th�oughout the County), on Cox Cable channel 24 (only in Chula Vista),
and online at www.chulavistaca.gov. Recorded meetings a�e also aiied on Wednesdays at 7 p.m.
(both channels) and are archived on the City's website.
Sign up at�wnv.chulavistaca.gov to receive email notifications when City Council agendas are
pu6lished online.
City ol Chula Yab Page d Pnnted on 7H7l1015
City Council Agenda � July 27, 2015
NOTICE OF REVIEW AND PENDING APPROVAL OF FINAL MAP
In accordance with Califomia Govemment Code Section 66458(d), notice is hereby given ihat the City Engineer
has reviewed and, immediately following this City Council meeting of Ju/y 21, 2015, will app�ove the following final
map:
Chu/a Vista Tract No. 06-05, Otay Ranch Village 2 Neighborhood R-72, 300 single family units locafed on 24.393
acres west of La Media Road and NoRh of Santa Venetia Street.
Specifically, the City Engineer has caused the map to be examined and has made the following findings:
(7) The map substantially confoims to the app�oved tentative map, and any approved alterations thereof and any
conditions of app�oval imposed with said tentative map.
. (2) The map complies with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act and any local ordinances applicable at the
time of approval of the tentative map.
(3) The map is technically correct. Said map wi/l be finalized and recorded, un/ess an interested party files a valid
appeal of the City Enginee�'s action to City Council no later than 2:00 p.m., 70 calenda� days from the date of this
City Council meeting. A valid appeal must identify the imprope�lncoirect finding and the basis for such
conGusion.
� If you have any questions about the map approval findings or need additional information about the map o� your
appeal rights,please feel Iree to contact 7om Adler at(619)409-5483.
City o!Chula Yata Paga 5 Pnnietl on 7H ll10f 5
City of Chula Vista
Staff Report
File#:15-0372, Item#: A.
EMPLOYEESERVICERECOGNITIONHONORINGSTAFFWITHMILESTONESERVICE
ANNIVERSARIES
City of Chula VistaPage 1 of 1Printed on 7/16/2015
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 5
City of Chula Vista
Staff Report
File#:15-0416, Item#: B.
PRESENTATIONBYSOUTHCOUNTYECONOMICDEVELOPMENTCOUNCILPRESIDENTAND
CEO, CINDY GOMPPER-GRAVES ON SOUTH COUNTY’S VISION
City of Chula VistaPage 1 of 1Printed on 7/16/2015
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 6
City of Chula Vista
Staff Report
File#:15-0421, Item#: 1.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES of June 16, 2015.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Council approve the minutes.
City of Chula VistaPage 1 of 1Printed on 7/16/2015
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 7
!"#$" %&'(") * (
+,, -."+ -& ,*"/"01($
C&,*@(! "D&-,"B; "94B22344"5+
#&-6 '" %(78,1*
9:;"< %"=>,-&, "?& '@ -."=
%&'(") * ( " ="ABAB4
E5F G=H"+FFCGIJE"KL"CMF"MKNEGIJ"=NCMKOGCP "EN FEEKO"=JFI P"CK"CMF"
OF0F)FHK5+FIC"=JFI P "=I0"GI0NECOG=H"0F)FHK5+FIC"=NCMKOGCP "+FFCGIJ"
DKGICHP"QGCM"CMF" GCP" KNI GH "+NIG G5=H"LGI=I GIJ"=NCMKOGCP "=I0"5N?HG "
LGI=I GIJ"=NCMKOGCP"KL"CMF" GCP"KL" MNH=")GEC=
=HH"CK"KO0FO
!"#$% &!!'#() *+ ',! -*./#() .',*0#'12 .""!//*0 )!("1 '* ',! 3!4!5!%* 6!(' )!("12 $(4
7(4./'0#$% 8!5!%* 6!(' .',*0#'1 6!!'#() 9*#('%1 :#', ',! ;#'1 ;*.("#%2 &.(#"# $% <#($("#() .',*0#'12 $(4
=.>%#" <#($("#() .',*0#'1 *+ ',! ;#'1 *+ ;,.%$ ?#/'$ :$/ "$%%!4 '* *04!0 $' @ABC D6D #( ',! ;*.("#%
;,$6>!0/2 %*"$'!4 #( ;#'1 -$%%2 EFC <*.0', 5!(.!2 ;,.%$ ?#/'$2 ;$%#+*0(#$D
%/* =0!/!('A ;#'1 &$($)!0 -$%>!0'2 ;#'1 ''*0(!1 G**)#(/2 ;#'1 ;%!0H I*00#/2 $(4 //#/'$(' ;#'1 ;%!0H
J#)!%*:
OKHH" =HH3
!"#$%$&%'()* "#+',(-%. /0(1+0 '(2% 3 33+ ,( !"#$%$&%'(1! + ,(
51,*,- 3
!"#$%$&%'(1"%3% (+ 4(1+0 '(5+#+3
5HF0JF"KL"=HHFJG=I F"CK"CMF"LH=J"=I0"+K+FIC"KL"EGHFI F
;*.("#%6!6>!0 &#!/!( %!4 ',! =%!4)! *+ %%!)#$("!D
E5F G=H"KO0FOE"KL"CMF"0=P
6789:;7
<)=>5(<?(<??@ A
=R
2+'&+'+(B+'+* C+,(>"3/ '"!(D'%3%'E+/"
F"'*" "+(50G0H,( #/ '+#()'/3
;#'1 ;%!0H I*00#/ $46#(#/'!0!4 ',! *$',/ *+ *++#"! '* ;*66#//#*(!0/ K$0$)*L$ $(4 1:192 $(4 8! .'1
&$1*0 J!(/*.//$( 0!/!('!4 ',!6 :#', "!0'#+#"$'!/ *+ $ *#('6!('D
6789:;I@J=K<-L =@<J(2M(2@NN(F)NNA,()55@5=)J=(-@KA =<K(<?(
?R
AJO@JAAK@JO,(<?(A1DN<MAA(<?(=>A(1<J=>(P)N)J@( )1) ><,(
5AJ@<K(DL2N@ (Q<KP5(@J5DA =<K
//#/'$(' 8#0!"'*0 *+ M()#(!!0#() ?$%%! #('0*4."!4 !6 %*1!! *+ ',! 6*(',2 N$%$(# ;$6$",*D &$1*0
$%$/ 0!$4 ',! 0*"%$6$'#*( $(4 ;*.("#%6!6>!0 &";$(( 0!/!('!4 #' '* &0D ;$6$",*D
&$1*0 $%$/ $((*.("!42 .0/.$(' '* J EO2 ',$' /,! $(4 !$", ;*.("#%6!6>!0 :*.%4 0!"!#5! P@B +*0
',!#0 $''!(4$("! $' ',#/ -*./#() .',*0#'1 6!!'#()2 >!#() ,!%4 /#6.%'$(!*./%1 :#', ',! ;#'1 ;*.("#%
6!!'#()D
D
#$%&!'(!#)*+ !,$-% !"
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 8
!" #&-6 '+,, -."+ -& ,*"/"01($ D&-,"B; "94B2
6789:;9
DKA5AJ=)=@<J(2M(1)KP( K<5>@AK()J-( >AN@(1<>)1A-(
R
KAO)K-@JO(=>A(LJ@=A-(5=)=A5(D<N@ A()J-(?@KA(
>)1D@<J5RQ<KN-(O)1A5
&0D ;0*/,#!0 / *H! 0!)$04#() ',! Q(#'!4 '$'!/ =*%#"! $(4 <#0! ;,$6 #*(/RS*0%4 G$6!/D
6789:76DKA5AJ=)=@<J(<?()(DK< N)1)=@<J(=<(LK5AN)(SL-@=>(
0R
OLK5=AJ(@J( ANA2K)=@<J(<?(>AK(T9=>(2@K=>-)M
&$1*0 $%$/ 0!$4 ',! 0*"%$6$'#*( $(4 8! .'1 &$1*0 J!(/*.//$( 0!/!('!4 #' '* &/D G.0/'!(D
6789:7U
DKA5AJ=)=@<J(<?()(DK< N)1)=@<J(=<(=>A(?)1@NM(
FR
><J<K@JO(5AKOA)J=(K)?)AN(DAK)N=)
&$1*0 $%$/ 0!$4 ',! 0*"%$6$'#*( $(4 ;*.("#%6!6>!0 &";$(( 0!/!('!4 #' '* ',! =!0$%'$ +$6#%1D
KIEFIC" =HFI0=O"SG ,7*"B"/"BBT
&$1*0 $%$/ /'$'!4 7'!6 E :$/ .%%!4 +0*6 ',! ;*(/!(' ;$%!(4$0 >1 $ 6!6>!0 *+ ',! .>%#"D
;#'1 ''*0(!1 G**)#(/ /'$'!4 ',$' ',! +*%%*:#() ;*.("#%6!6>!0/ ,$4 *'!('#$% 0* !0'1T0!%$'!4 "*(+%#"'/
*+ #('!0!/' *( *0'#*(/ *+ 7'!6 F $(4 :*.%4 $>/'$#( +0*6 5*'#() *( ',*/! *0'#*(/ *+ ',! #'!6A
;*.("#%6!6>!0 &";$(( *( 7'!6/ F;2 F82 F72 $(4 FUV ;*.("#%6!6>!0 ).#%$0 *( 7'!6/ FM2 F<2 F72 $(4
FUV &$1*0 $%$/ *( 7'!6/ FG $(4 F-V $(4 ;*.("#%6!6>!0 &#!/!( *( 7'!6/ FN $(4 FWD
6789:79)DDK<F)N(<?(1@JL=A5( V(1+0(6;,(:967W
BR
O,6#77,-@,@"=6 #-3" #&-6 '"(UU1#>," %,"7 -& ,*R
7'!6 E :$/ 0!6*5!4 +0*6 ',! ;*(/!(' ;$%!(4$0D
6789:9XKA5<NL=@<J(J<W(:967866T(<?(=>A( @=M( <LJ @N(<?(=>A( @=M(
VR
<?( >LN)(F@5=)()DDK<F@JO()J()1AJ-1AJ=(=<(=>A(
<J=K) =(Q@=>(=2Q2(5=K)=AO@A5(=<(DK<F@-A()--@=@<J)N(
D<NN@JO()J-(DL2N@ (<L=KA) >( <J5LN=)J=(5AKF@ A5
O,6#77,-@,@"=6 #-3" #&-6 '"(@#U " %,"1,*#'& #-R
67896XIKA5<NL=@<J(J<W(:96786:9(<?(=>A( @=M( <LJ @N(<?(=>A( @=M(
<R
<?( >LN)(F@5=)()L=><K@B@JO(=>A( @=M(1)J)OAK,(<K(
-A5@OJAA,(=<(DLK >)5A(F)K@<L5( <1DL=AK(AYL@D1AJ=(
?K<1(-ANN,(@J W(L=@N@B@JO(J)5D<(F)NLAD<@J=( <J=K) =((
Z2:\[6U9,()DDK<F@JO()(NA)5A()OKAA1AJ=(Q@=>(-ANN(
?@J)J @)N(5AKF@ A5(=<(NA)5A(:99( <1DL=AK(
Q<KP5=)=@<J5,()J-()DDK<F@JO()(=K)J5?AK(<?(\\U9,U69(
?K<1(=>A(?M(:96;8:967(@J?<K1)=@<J(=A >J<N<OM(5AKF@ A5(
)D@=)N(2L-OA=((=<(=>A(?M(:96;8:967(@J?<K1)=@<J(
=A >J<N<OM(5AKF@ A5(5LDDN@A5()J-(5AKF@ A5(2L-OA=((\];R7(
F<=A(KAYL@KA-^
O,6#77,-@,@"=6 #-3" #&-6 '"(@#U " %,"1,*#'& #-R
D
#$%&!'(!#)*+ !,$-% !.
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 9
!" #&-6 '+,, -."+ -& ,*"/"01($ D&-,"B; "94B2
6789:6;
KA5<NL=@<J(J<W(:96786:6(<?(=>A( @=M( <LJ @N(<?(=>A( @=M(
2R
<?( >LN)(F@5=)(A5=)2N@5>@JO(=>A(O)JJ(@J@=@)=@FA(
)DDK<DK@)=@<J5(N@1@=(?<K(=>A( @=M(<?( >LN)(F@5=)(?<K(
?@5 )N(MA)K(:967R:96U
O,6#77,-@,@"=6 #-3" #&-6 '"(@#U " %,"1,*#'& #-R
6789::;)W<K-@J)J A(<?(=>A( @=M(<?( >LN)(F@5=)()1AJ-@JO(
;R
5A =@<J(69W9XW669(<?(=>A( >LN)(F@5=)(1LJ@ @D)N( <-A(
KAN)=@JO(=<(=>A(-A?@J@=@<J(<?(><N@-)M5(?<K(D)KP@JO(
1A=AK5()J-(B<JA5(\]?@K5=(KA)-@JO^
2WKA5<NL=@<J(J<W(:96786::(<?(=>A( @=M( <LJ @N(<?(=>A(
@=M(<?( >LN)(F@5=)(KADA)N@JO( @=M( <LJ @N(D<N@ M(J<W(UU:
89U(\]NAO)N(><N@-)M5^
O,6#77,-@,@"=6 #-3" #&-6 '"U'(6," %,"#1@ -(-6,"#-"$ 1* "1,(@ -."(-@"(@#U "
%,"1,*#'& #-R
6789::9)WKA5<NL=@<J(J<W(:96786:I(<?(=>A( @=M( <LJ @N(<?(=>A(
:R
@=M(<?( >LN)(F@5=)()DDK<F@JO(=>A(AJO@JAAK_5(KAD<K=(
?<K(=>A(?@5 )N(MA)K(:967R:96U(?<K(<DAJ(5D) A(-@5=K@ =5(:(
=>K<LO>(\[,((66,(6;,(67,(6\[,(6X,(:I,(:;,(:U,(I6()J-(II,()J-(2)M(
2<LNAF)K-(1)@J=AJ)J A(-@5=K@ =
2WKA5<NL=@<J(J<W(:96786:;(<?(=>A( @=M( <LJ @N(<?(=>A(
@=M(<?( >LN)(F@5=)()DDK<F@JO(=>A(5DKA)-(<?(
)55A551AJ=5,(-A N)K@JO(=>A(@J=AJ=@<J(=<(NAFM()J-(
<NNA =(=>A()55A551AJ=5`()J-(5A==@JO()(DL2N@ (>A)K@JO(
KAO)K-@JO(=>A5A()55A551AJ=5(?<K(=>A(?@5 )N(MA)K(
:967R:96U(?<K(<DAJ(5D) A(-@5=K@ =5(:(=>K<LO>(\[,((66,(6;,(67,(
6\[,(6X,(:I,(:;,(:U,(I6()J-(II,()J-(2)M(2<LNAF)K-(
1)@J=AJ)J A(-@5=K@ =
WKA5<NL=@<J(J<W(:96786:7(<?(=>A( @=M( <LJ @N(<?(=>A(
@=M(<?( >LN)(F@5=)()DDK<F@JO(=>A(AJO@JAAK_5(KAD<K=(
?<K(=>A(?@5 )N(MA)K(:967R:96U(?<K(<DAJ(5D) A(
1)@J=AJ)J A(-@5=K@ =(J<W(6
-WKA5<NL=@<J(J<W(:96786:U(<?(=>A( @=M( <LJ @N(<?(=>A(
@=M(<?( >LN)(F@5=)()DDK<F@JO(=>A(5DKA)-(<?(
)55A551AJ=5,(-A N)K@JO(=>A(@J=AJ=@<J(=<(NAFM()J-(
<NNA =(=>A()55A551AJ=5`()J-(5A==@JO()(DL2N@ (>A)K@JO(
KAO)K-@JO(=>A5A()55A551AJ=5(?<K(=>A(?@5 )N(MA)K(
:967R:96U(?<K(<DAJ(5D) A(1)@J=AJ)J A(-@5=K@ =(J<W(6
#$%&!'(!#)*+ !,$-% !/
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 10
!" #&-6 '+,, -."+ -& ,*"/"01($ D&-,"B; "94B2
AWKA5<NL=@<J(J<W(:96786:\[(<?(=>A( @=M( <LJ @N(<?(=>A(
@=M(<?( >LN)(F@5=)()DDK<F@JO(=>A(AJO@JAAK_5(KAD<K=(
?<K(=>A(?@5 )N(MA)K(:967R:96U(?<K(<DAJ(5D) A(
1)@J=AJ)J A(-@5=K@ =(J<W(X
?WKA5<NL=@<J(J<W(:96786:X(<?(=>A( @=M( <LJ @N(<?(=>A(
@=M(<?( >LN)(F@5=)()DDK<F@JO(=>A(5DKA)-(<?(
)55A551AJ=5,(-A N)K@JO(=>A(@J=AJ=@<J(=<(NAFM()J-(
<NNA =(=>A()55A551AJ=5`()J-(5A==@JO()(DL2N@ (>A)K@JO(
KAO)K-@JO(=>A5A()55A551AJ=5(?<K(=>A(?@5 )N(MA)K(
:967R:96U(?<K(<DAJ(5D) A(1)@J=AJ)J A(-@5=K@ =(J<W(X
OWKA5<NL=@<J(J<W(:96786:T(<?(=>A( @=M( <LJ @N(<?(=>A(
@=M(<?( >LN)(F@5=)()DDK<F@JO(=>A(AJO@JAAK_5(KAD<K=(
?<K(=>A(?@5 )N(MA)K(:967R:96U(?<K(1)@J=AJ)J A(-@5=K@ =5(
T,(69,()J-(=>A(=<QJ( AJ=KA(1)@J=AJ)J A(-@5=K@ =
>WKA5<NL=@<J(J<W(:96786I9(<?(=>A( @=M( <LJ @N(<?(=>A(
@=M(<?( >LN)(F@5=)()DDK<F@JO(=>A(5DKA)-(<?(
)55A551AJ=5,(-A N)K@JO(=>A(@J=AJ=@<J(=<(NAFM()J-(
<NNA =(=>A()55A551AJ=5`()J-(5A==@JO()(DL2N@ (>A)K@JO(
KAO)K-@JO(=>A5A()55A551AJ=5(?<K(=>A(?@5 )N(MA)K(
:967R:96U(?<K(<DAJ(5D) A(1)@J=AJ)J A(-@5=K@ =5(T,(69,(
)J-(=>A(=<QJ( AJ=KA(1)@J=AJ)J A(-@5=K@ =
@WKA5<NL=@<J(J<W(:96786I6(<?(=>A( @=M( <LJ @N(<?(=>A(
@=M(<?( >LN)(F@5=)()DDK<F@JO(=>A(AJO@JAAK_5(KAD<K=(
?<K(=>A(?@5 )N(MA)K(:967R:96U(?<K(<DAJ(5D) A(
1)@J=AJ)J A(-@5=K@ =(J<W(:9
SWKA5<NL=@<J(J<W(:96786I:(<?(=>A( @=M( <LJ @N(<?(=>A(
@=M(<?( >LN)(F@5=)()DDK<F@JO(=>A(5DKA)-(<?(
)55A551AJ=5,(-A N)K@JO(=>A(@J=AJ=@<J(=<(NAFM()J-(
<NNA =(=>A()55A551AJ=5`()J-(5A==@JO()(DL2N@ (>A)K@JO(
KAO)K-@JO(=>A5A()55A551AJ=5(?<K(=>A(?@5 )N(MA)K(
:967R:96U(?<K(<DAJ(5D) A(1)@J=AJ)J A(-@5=K@ =(J<W(:9
PWKA5<NL=@<J(J<W(:96786II(<?(=>A( @=M( <LJ @N(<?(=>A(
@=M(<?( >LN)(F@5=)()DDK<F@JO(=>A(AJO@JAAK_5(KAD<K=(
?<K(=>A(?@5 )N(MA)K(:967R:96U(?<K(A)5=N)PA(1)@J=AJ)J A(
-@5=K@ =(J<W(6(\]AN1-(Z6^
#$%&!'(!#)*+ !,$-% !0
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 11
!" #&-6 '+,, -."+ -& ,*"/"01($ D&-,"B; "94B2
NWKA5<NL=@<J(J<W(:96786I;(<?(=>A( @=M( <LJ @N(<?(=>A(
@=M(<?( >LN)(F@5=)()DDK<F@JO(=>A(5DKA)-(<?(
)55A551AJ=5,(-A N)K@JO(=>A(@J=AJ=@<J(=<(NAFM()J-(
<NNA =(=>A()55A551AJ=5`()J-(5A==@JO()(DL2N@ (>A)K@JO(
KAO)K-@JO(=>A5A()55A551AJ=5(?<K(=>A(?@5 )N(MA)K(
:967R:96U(?<K(A)5=N)PA(1)@J=AJ)J A(-@5=K@ =(J<W(6(\]AN1-(
Z6^
O,6#77,-@,@"=6 #-3" #&-6 '"(@#U " %,"1,*#'& #-*"(-@"*, " %,"U&8' 6"%,(1 -."
$#1"D&'!"B< "94B2R
67896\[;KA5<NL=@<J(J<W(:96786I7(<?(=>A( @=M( <LJ @N(<?(=>A( @=M(
WR
<?( >LN)(F@5=)()DDK<F@JO()(1A1<K)J-L1(<?(
LJ-AK5=)J-@JO(2A=QAAJ(=>A( @=M(<?( >LN)(F@5=)()J-(=>A(
@=M(<?(J)=@<J)N( @=M(?<K(AaD)J5@<J(<?(=>A(?KAA(
KA5<LK A()J-(AJAKOM(2L5@JA55(AF)NL)=@<J(DK<OK)1
O,6#77,-@,@"=6 #-3" #&-6 '"(@#U " %,"1,*#'& #-R
67896XT)W<K-@J)J A((<?(=>A( @=M(<?( >LN)(F@5=)()1AJ-@JO(
AR
5A =@<J(6;W:9(<?(=>A( >LN)(F@5=)(1LJ@ @D)N( <-A(
KAN)=@JO(=<(b5=<K1(Q)=AK(1)J)OA1AJ=()J-(-@5 >)KOA(
<J=K<Nc(\]?@K5=(KA)-@JO^
2WKA5<NL=@<J(J<W(:96786IU(<?(=>A( @=M( <LJ @N(<?(=>A(
@=M(<?( >LN)(F@5=)()DDK<F@JO()J-()L=><K@B@JO(
5L21@==)N(<?(=>A(5)J(-@AO<(2)M(Q)=AK5>A-(1)J)OA1AJ=(
)KA)(Q)=AK(YL)N@=M(@1DK<FA1AJ=(DN)J(\]QY@D^,()DDK<F@JO(
)J-()L=><K@B@JO(5L21@==)N(<?(=>A(b @=M(<?( >LN)(F@5=)(
SLK@5-@ =@<J)N(KLJ<??(1)J)OA1AJ=(DK<OK)1,(SLJA(:967(
\]SK1D^c(-< L1AJ=()J-()L=><K@B@JO(=>A(5L21@==)N(<?(
5L25AYLAJ=(SK1D(KAD<K=5()J-(LD-)=A5()N<JO(Q@=>(=>A(
QY@D()JJL)N(KAD<K=(=<(=>A(5)J(-@AO<(KAO@<J)N(Q)=AK(
YL)N@=M( <J=K<N(2<)K-
O,6#77,-@,@"=6 #-3" #&-6 '"U'(6," %,"#1@ -(-6,"#-"$ 1* "1,(@ -."(-@"(@#U "
%,"1,*#'& #-R
6789::U
KA5<NL=@<J(J<W(:96786I\[(<?(=>A( @=M( <LJ @N(<?(=>A( @=M(
B4R
<?( >LN)(F@5=)()DDK<F@JO( <J=@JL)=@<J(<?(ANA =K@ @=M(
<11<-@=M(DLK >)5A5(?K<1(5>ANN(AJAKOM()J-(
)L=><K@B@JO(=>A( @=M(1)J)OAK(=<(AaA L=A()NN(
-< L1AJ=5(@J( <JSLJ =@<J(Q@=>(=>A(DLK >)5A5
O,6#77,-@,@"=6 #-3" #&-6 '"(@#U " %,"1,*#'& #-R
D
#$%&!'(!#)*+ !,$-% !1
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 12
!" #&-6 '+,, -."+ -& ,*"/"01($ D&-,"B; "94B2
6789:6X
KA5<NL=@<J(J<W(:96786IX(<?(=>A( @=M( <LJ @N(<?(=>A( @=M(
BBR
<?( >LN)(F@5=)()DDK<DK@)=@JO(\\;7,999(?K<1(=>A()F)@N)2NA(
2)N)J A(<?(=>A(O)5(=)a(?LJ-(=<( )D@=)N(@1DK<FA1AJ=(
DK<SA =(5=N;9I`() AD=@JO(2@-5`()Q)K-@JO(=>A( <J=K) =(
?<K(=>A(b K<55(OL==AK(KA>)2@N@=)=@<J( @=MQ@-A(
?M:96;8:967(\] @DZ5=N;9I^c(DK<SA =(=<( )K<N@J<()J-(5<J(
AJO@JAAK@JO( <KD<K)=@<J(@J(=>A()1<LJ=(<?(\\6\[\[,\[\[\[`()J-(
)L=><K@B@JO(=>A(AaDAJ-@=LKA(<?()NN()F)@N)2NA(
<J=@JOAJ M(?LJ-5(@J()J()1<LJ=(J<=(=<(Aa AA-(\\::,;;;(
\];R7(F<=A(KAYL@KA-^
O,6#77,-@,@"=6 #-3" #&-6 '"(@#U " %,"1,*#'& #-R
= CGKI3="7# #-"X(*"7(@,"8!"0,U& !"+(!#1"?,-*#&**(- "*,6#-@,@"8!" #&-6 '7,78,1"
+6 (-- " #"(UU1#>,"* ($$Y*"1,6#77,-@( #-*"#-" %," #-*,- " (',-@(1" ,7* "
%,(@ -.*"1,(@ " ,Z "X( >,@R"C%,"7# #-"6(11 ,@"8!" %,"$#''#X -."># ,3
G ,7*"B "V" %1#&.%"; ":= ":? "(-@"W" %1#&.%"BB3
7(8()* "#+',(2% 3 33+ ,(1! + ,(1"%3% (+ 4(5+#+3
P,*3
9(((
I#3
9(((
=8* ( -3
G ,7*": "(-@":03
;(8()* "#+',(2% 3 33+ ,(1"%3% (+ 4(5+#+3
P,*3
9(((
I#3
6(8(1! +
=8* ( -3
G ,7*":F"(-@":L3
;(8(2% 3 33+ ,(1! + ,(1"%3% (+ 4(5+#+3
P,*3
9(((
I#3
6(8()* "#+'
=8* ( -3
8! .'1 &$1*0 J!(/*.//$( %!4 ',! 5*'#() *( 7'!6/ FG $(4 F-D
G ,7*":J"(-@":M3
;(8()* "#+',(2% 3 33+ ,(1! + (+ 4(1"%3%
P,*3
9(((
I#3
=8* ( -3
444A44444
G ,7*":G"(-@":D3
I(8(2% 3 33+ ,(1"%3% (+ 4(5+#+3
P,*3
9(((
I#3
:(8()* "#+'(+ 4(1! +
=8* ( -3
G ,7*":\["(-@":H3
;(8()* "#+',(2% 3 33+ ,(1! + (+ 4(5+#+3
P,*3
9(((
I#3
6(8(1"%3%
=8* ( -3
#$%&!'(!#)*+ !,$-% !2
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 13
!" #&-6 '+,, -."+ -& ,*"/"01($ D&-,"B; "94B2
GCF+E"OF+K)F0"LOK+"CMF" KIEFIC" =HFI0=O
6789:;;
<K-@J)J A(J<W(II;7(<?(=>A( @=M(<?( >LN)(F@5=)()DDK<F@JO(
9R
)(-AFAN<D1AJ=()OKAA1AJ=(2A=QAAJ(=>A( @=M(<?( >LN)(
F@5=),(F@NN)OA(@@(=<QJ( AJ=AK,(NN ,()J-(5LJK)J >( )D@=)N(
D)K=JAK5,(NN ,(?<K(=>A(?KAAQ)M( <11AK @)N(J<K=>(
D<K=@<J(<?(<=)M(K)J >(DN)JJ@JO()KA)(6:(\]5A <J-(
KA)-@JO()J-()-<D=@<J^
;#'1 ''*0(!1 G**)#(/ /'$'!4 $( $6!(4!4 $)0!!6!(' :#', 6#(*02 '!",(#"$% "*00!"'#*(/ ,$4 >!!(
4#/'0#>.'!4 '* ;*.("#% $(4 ',$' ',! ",$()!/ :*.%4 >! #("*0 *0$'!4 /,*.%4 ',! #'!6 >! $4* '!4D
&$0H W#.$)2 ;,.%$ ?#/'$ 0!/#4!('2 / *H! #( /. *0' *+ ',! #'!6 >!#() "*('#(.!4 '* $ +.'.0! 6!!'#() $(4
/ *H! #( * */#'#*( '* /'$++X/ 0!"*66!(4$'#*(D
;#'1 ''*0(!1 G**)#(/ /'$'!4 ',! 0* */!4 0!5#/!4 $)0!!6!(' :$/ $5$#%$>%! +*0 .>%#" 0!5#!: :#', ',!
$)!(4$ $"H!' $(4 ',$' ',! $6!(46!('/ 6$4! '* ',! $)0!!6!(' :!0! $/ 4#0!"'!4 >1 ',! ;*.("#% $' ',!
6!!'#() *+ &$1 EC2 EBY@D -! /'$'!4 ',$' ',! "*00!"'#*(/ 0!/!('!4 '* ',! ;*.("#% $' ',! 6!!'#() *+ U.(!
YC2 EBY@ :!0! '!",(#"$% #( ($'.0!D
;#'1 ''*0(!1 G**)#(/ 0*5#4!4 #(+*06$'#*( *( ',! $6!(46!('/ '* ',! $)0!!6!('2 $/ $ 0*5!4 >1
;*.("#% $' ',! 6!!'#() *+ &$1 EC2 EBY@D
;#'1 ''*0(!1 G**)#(/ /'$'!4 ',$' ;*.("#%6!6>!0 &#!/!( :$/ $>/'$#(#() +0*6 5*'#() $(4 $0'#"# $'#()
*( ',! #'!6 4.! '* $ *'!('#$% +#($("#$%T0!%$'!4 "*(+%#"' *+ #('!0!/'D ;*.("#%6!6>!0 &#!/!( %!+' ',! 4$#/
4.0#() 4#/".//#*( $(4 5*'#() *( ',! #'!6D
= CGKI3="7# #-"X(*"7(@,"8!"0,U& !"+(!#1"?,-*#&**(- "*,6#-@,@"8!" #&-6 '7,78,1"
=.& '(1 " %( "K1@ -(-6,"I#R"VV<2"8,"(@#U ,@"(*"(7,-@,@ "%,(@ -."1,(@ " ,Z "
X( >,@R"C%,"7# #-"6(11 ,@"8!" %,"$#''#X -."># ,3
;(8()* "#+',(2% 3 33+ ,(1! + (+ 4(5+#+3
P,*3
9(((
I#3
6(8(1"%3%
=8* ( -3
5N?HG " K++FICE
N#6 ?$(4!0 J#!2 0! 0!/!('#() ',! ;,.%$ ?#/'$ M6 %*1!!/ //*"#$'#*(2 / *H! #( /. *0' *+ +$#0 6$0H!'
:$)!/ +*0 ;#'1 !6 %*1!!/D
U!$(#! J$%4!0$/2 ;,.%$ ?#/'$ !6 %*1!!2 / *H! #( /. *0' *+ 6$#('$#(#() !6 %*1!! >!(!+#'/ $(4 $0#'1 #(
:$)!/ +*0 ;#'1 !6 %*1!!/D
;*.("#%6!6>!0 ).#%$0 /'$'!4 ',$' /,! 6!' ',! +*%%*:#() / !$H!02 U!//#"$ ;*>#$(2 $(4 6!6>!0/ *+ ',!
%%#$("! *+ ;$%#+*0(#$(/ +*0 ;*66.(#'1 M6 *:!06!(' Z ;;M\[2 $(4 ,$4 !("*.0$)!4 ',! 6!6>!0/ '*
$''!(4 ',! ;*.("#% 6!!'#() '* !\\ 0!// ',!#0 "*("!0(/ '* ',! +.%% ;*.("#%D
\],! +*%%*:#() 6!6>!0/ *+ ;;M !\\ 0!//!4 "*("!0( 0!)$04#() ',! "*(4#'#*( *+ /'0!!'/ $(4 *',!0
#(+0$/'0."'.0! #( ',! /*.',:!/' $0!$ *+ ;,.%$ ?#/'$A
T U!//#"$ ;*>$#(2 0! 0!/!('#() ;;M
T M%*4#$ ?#%%$2 ;,.%$ ?#/'$ 0!/#4!('2 0*5#4!4 '!/'#6*(1 #( $(#/,2 :,#", :$/ '0$(/%$'!4 >1 U!//#"$
;*>$#(
T 0'.0* &$0'#(!L2 ;,.%$ ?#/'$ 0!/#4!('2 0*5#4!4 '!/'#6*(1 #( $(#/,2 :,#", :$/ '0$(/%$'!4 >1 U!//#"$
;*>$#(
#$%&!'(!#)*+ !,$-% !3
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 14
!" #&-6 '+,, -."+ -& ,*"/"01($ D&-,"B; "94B2
N!( \],#%')!(2 ;,.%$ ?#/'$ !6 %*1!!2 / *H! #( /. *0' *+ /$%$01 #("0!$/!/ $(4 6$#('$#(#() >!(!+#'/ +*0
;#'1 !6 %*1!!/D
\],! +*%%*:#() 6!6>!0/ *+ ',! .>%#" !\\ 0!//!4 "*("!0( 0!)$04#() 6*'*0 ,*6! $0H#() $(4 #//.!/
0!%$'!4 '* ,*6!%!//(!// #( ',! $0!$ *+ <*.0', 5!(.! $(4 (#'$ '0!!'2 $(4 / *H! #( /. *0' *+ ',!
#6 %!6!('$'#*( *+ $ >#H! %$(! *0 $0H#() 0!/'0#"'#*(/ #( ',! $0!$A
T W!:#/ &"7('#0!2 ;,.%$ ?#/'$ 0!/#4!('
T 3$% , J0*:(2 ;,.%$ ?#/'$ 0!/#4!('
T 3$",!% (4!0/*(2 ;,.%$ ?#/'$ 0!/#4!('
&$0H W#.$)2 ;,.%$ ?#/'$ 0!/#4!('2 /.>6#''!4 / !$H!0 /%# >.' :$/ (*' 0!/!(' '* / !$HD
5N?HG "MF=OGIJE
6789::X <J5@-AK)=@<J(<?() AD=)J A(<?(=>A(:967(A-Q)K-(2MKJA(
B9R
1A1<K@)N(SL5=@ A()55@5=)J A(OK)J=(?LJ-5
KA5<NL=@<J(J<W(:96786IT(<?(=>A( @=M( <LJ @N(<?(=>A( @=M(
<?( >LN)(F@5=)() AD=@JO(\\;7,;X6(?K<1(=>A(2LKA)L(<?(
SL5=@ A()55@5=)J A(?<K(=>A(:967(A-Q)K-(2MKJA(1A1<K@)N(
SL5=@ A()55@5=)J A(OK)J=
I*'#"! *+ ',! ,!$0#() :$/ )#5!( #( $""*04$("! :#', %!)$% 0!^.#0!6!('/2 $(4 ',! ,!$0#() :$/ ,!%4 *( ',!
4$'! $(4 (* !$0%#!0 ',$( ',! '#6! / !"#+#!4 #( ',! (*'#"!D
&$1*0 $%$/ * !(!4 ',! .>%#" ,!$0#()D \],!0! >!#() (* 6!6>!0/ *+ ',! .>%#" :,* :#/,!4 '* / !$H2
&$1*0 $%$/ "%*/!4 ',! .>%#" ,!$0#()D
= CGKI3="7# #-"X(*"7(@,"8!" #&-6 '7,78,1"+6 (-- "*,6#-@,@"8!" #&-6 '7,78,1"
=.& '(1 " %( "O,*#'& #-"I#R"94B2/BVA"8,"(@#U ,@ "%,(@ -."1,(@ " ,Z "X( >,@R"C%,"
7# #-"6(11 ,@"8!" %,"$#''#X -."># ,3
7(8()* "#+',(2% 3 33+ ,(1! + ,(1"%3% (+ 4(5+#+3
P,*3
9(((
I#3
9(((
=8* ( -3
6789:IU <J5@-AK)=@<J(<?()-<D=@<J(<?(=>A(<DAK)=@JO()J-(
BVR
)D@=)N(@1DK<FA1AJ=(2L-OA=5(?<K(=>A( @=M()J-(=>A(
<DAK)=@JO(2L-OA=5(?<K(=>A(><L5@JO()L=><K@=M()J-(
5L A55<K()OAJ M(=<(=>A(KA-AFAN<D1AJ=()OAJ M(?<K(
?@5 )N(MA)K(:9678:96U
)WKA5<NL=@<J(J<W(:96786;9(<?(=>A( @=M( <LJ @N(<?(=>A(
@=M(<?( >LN)(F@5=)()-<D=@JO(=>A(<DAK)=@JO()J-( )D@=)N(
@1DK<FA1AJ=(2L-OA=5(?<K(=>A( @=M(<?( >LN)(F@5=)(?<K(
?@5 )N(MA)K(:9678:96U()J-()DDK<DK@)=@JO(?LJ-5(?<K(=>A(
?@5 )N(MA)K(AJ-@JO(SLJA(I9,(:96U(Aa NL-@JO( )D@=)N(
@1DK<FA1AJ=(DK<SA =5d(-K(:9:,(<D(::7,(5=N(;9U,()J-(=?(IT7,(
<DAJ(5D) A(-@5=K@ =5d(6,(X869,(:9,(A)5=N)PA(1)@J=AJ)J A(
-@5=K@ =,((( <11LJ@=M(?) @N@=M(-@5=K@ =5d(T\[86(<K()J-(9\[1(
@1DK<FA1AJ=()KA)5,()J-(=>A(<=>AK(AaDAJ5A5( )=AO<KM(
<?(=>A(J<J8-AD)K=1AJ=)N(2L-OA=(@J(=>A(OAJAK)N(?LJ-(
#$%&!'(!#)*+ !,$-% !4
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 15
!" #&-6 '+,, -."+ -& ,*"/"01($ D&-,"B; "94B2
2WKA5<NL=@<J(J<W(:96786;6(<?(=>A( @=M( <LJ @N(<?(=>A(
@=M(<?( >LN)(F@5=)()-<D=@JO(=>A(<DAK)=@JO(2L-OA=5(
)J-( )D@=)N(@1DK<FA1AJ=(2L-OA=5(?<K( @D(DK<SA =5(-K(
:9:()J-(=?(IT7,(<DAJ(5D) A(-@5=K@ =(6,(()J-(( <11LJ@=M(
?) @N@=M(-@5=K@ =5(T\[86(<K()J-(9\[1(@1DK<FA1AJ=()KA)5(
?<K(?@5 )N(MA)K(:9678:96U()J-()DDK<DK@)=@JO(?LJ-5(?<K(
=>A(?@5 )N(MA)K(AJ-@JO(SLJA(I9,(:96U
WKA5<NL=@<J(J<W(:96786;:(<?(=>A( @=M( <LJ @N(<?(=>A(
@=M(<?( >LN)(F@5=)()-<D=@JO(=>A(<DAK)=@JO(2L-OA=5(
)J-( )D@=)N(@1DK<FA1AJ=(2L-OA=5(?<K( @D(DK<SA =5(<D(
::7()J-(5=N(;9U,(<DAJ(5D) A(-@5=K@ =5(T()J-(69,()J-(=>A(
<=>AK(AaDAJ5A5( )=AO<KM(<?(=>A(J<J8-AD)K=1AJ=)N(
2L-OA=(@J(=>A(OAJAK)N(?LJ-((()J-((?<K(?@5 )N(MA)K(:9678
:96U()J-()DDK<DK@)=@JO(?LJ-5(?<K(=>A(?@5 )N(MA)K(
AJ-@JO(SLJA(I9,(:96U
-WKA5<NL=@<J(J<W(:96786;I(<?(=>A( @=M( <LJ @N(<?(=>A(
@=M(<?( >LN)(F@5=)()-<D=@JO(=>A(<DAK)=@JO(2L-OA=(?<K(
<DAJ(5D) A(-@5=K@ =(X(?<K(?@5 )N(MA)K(:9678:96U()J-(
)DDK<DK@)=@JO(?LJ-5(?<K(=>A(?@5 )N(MA)K(AJ-@JO(SLJA(I9,(
:96U
AWKA5<NL=@<J(J<W(:96786;;(<?(=>A( @=M( <LJ @N(<?(=>A(
@=M(<?( >LN)(F@5=)()-<D=@JO(=>A(<DAK)=@JO(2L-OA=(?<K(
A)5=N)PA(1)@J=AJ)J A(-@5=K@ =((?<K(?@5 )N(MA)K(:9678:96U(
)J-()DDK<DK@)=@JO(?LJ-5(?<K(=>A(?@5 )N(MA)K(AJ-@JO(
SLJA(I9,(:96U
?WKA5<NL=@<J(J<W(:96786;7(<?(=>A( @=M( <LJ @N(<?(=>A(
@=M(<?( >LN)(F@5=)()-<D=@JO(=>A(<DAK)=@JO(2L-OA=(?<K(
<DAJ(5D) A(-@5=K@ =(:9(?<K(?@5 )N(MA)K(:9678:96U()J-(
)DDK<DK@)=@JO(?LJ-5(?<K(=>A(?@5 )N(MA)K(AJ-@JO(SLJA(I9,(
:96U
OWKA5<NL=@<J(J<W(:96786;U(<?(=>A( @=M( <LJ @N(<?(=>A(
@=M(<?( >LN)(F@5=)()1AJ-@JO(=>A( <1DAJ5)=@<J(
5 >A-LNA()J-( N)55@?@ )=@<J(DN)J(=<(KA?NA =(=>A(
)--@=@<J(<?(F)K@<L5(D<5@=@<J(=@=NA5()J-( >)JOA5(@J(
5)N)KM()5(KA?NA =A-(@J(=>A(?@5 )N(MA)K(:9678:96U(
<DAK)=@JO(2L-OA=
>WKA5<NL=@<J(J<W(:96786;\[(<?(=>A( @=M( <LJ @N(<?(=>A(
@=M(<?( >LN)(F@5=)()DDK<F@JO(=>A(KAF@5A-(?@5 )N(MA)K(
:9678:96U( <1DAJ5)=@<J(5 >A-LNA()5(KAYL@KA-(2M(
)N@?<KJ@)( <-A(<?(KAOLN)=@<J5,(=@=NA(:,(5A =@<J(7\[9W7
#$%&!'(!#)*+ !,$-% !5
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 16
!" #&-6 '+,, -."+ -& ,*"/"01($ D&-,"B; "94B2
@WKA5<NL=@<J(J<W(:96786;X(<?(=>A( @=M( <LJ @N(<?(=>A(
@=M(<?( >LN)(F@5=)()1AJ-@JO(A1DN<MAK(D)@-(1A12AK(
<J=K@2L=@<J5(?<K(ANA =A-(<??@ @)N5,(AaA L=@FA5,()J-(
5AJ@<K(1)J)OAK5
SWKA5<NL=@<J(J<W(:96786;T(<?(=>A( @=M( <LJ @N(<?(=>A(
@=M(<?( >LN)(F@5=)()DDK<F@JO(\]6^(=>A()1AJ-A-(
<1DAJ5)=@<J(5L11)KM(?<K()NN(LJKADKA5AJ=A-(
A1DN<MAA5()J-(ANA =A-(<??@ @)N5,(@J NL-@JO(
)L=><K@B)=@<J(?<K(=>A(1)M<K(=<(AaA L=A()JM(
JA A55)KM( <J=K) =()1AJ-1AJ=5(=<(@1DNA1AJ=(5)@-(
)1AJ-A-( <1DAJ5)=@<J(5L11)KM(\]:^()J-( A55)=@<J(<?(
D)M1AJ=(2M(ANA =A-(<??@ @)N5,(AaA L=@FA5,()J-(5AJ@<K(
1)J)OAK5,(<J(A1DN<MAK(5@-A,(?<K(<D=@<J)N(2AJA?@=5()5()(
KA5LN=(<?(=AK1@J)=@<J(<?(A1DN<MAK(D)@-(1A12AK(
<J=K@2L=@<J(\]AD1 ^(?<K(ANA =A-(<??@ @)N5,(AaA L=@FA5,(
)J-(5AJ@<K(1)J)OAK5
PWKA5<NL=@<J(J<W(:967899;(<?(=>A(><L5@JO()L=><K@=M(<?(
=>A( @=M(<?( >LN)(F@5=)()-<D=@JO(=>A(<DAK)=@JO(2L-OA=(
?<K(=>A(><L5@JO()L=><K@=M(?<K(?@5 )N(MA)K(:9678:96U()J-(
)DDK<DK@)=@JO(?LJ-5(?<K(=>A(?@5 )N(MA)K(AJ-@JO(SLJA(I9,(
:96U
NWKA5<NL=@<J(J<W(:967899:(<?(=>A(5L A55<K()OAJ M(=<(
=>A(KA-AFAN<D1AJ=()OAJ M(<?(=>A( @=M(<?( >LN)(F@5=)(
)-<D=@JO(=>A(<DAK)=@JO(2L-OA=5(?<K(=>A(5L A55<K(
)OAJ M(=<(=>A(KA-AFAN<D1AJ=()OAJ M(?<K(?@5 )N(MA)K(
:9678:96U()J-()DDK<DK@)=@JO(?LJ-5(?<K(=>A(?@5 )N(MA)K(
AJ-@JO(SLJA(I9,(:96U
1W<K-@J)J A(<?(=>A( @=M(<?( >LN)(F@5=)()1AJ-@JO( >LN)(
F@5=)(1LJ@ @D)N( <-A(5A =@<J(:W97W969(KAN)=@JO(=<(=>A(
A5=)2N@5>1AJ=(<?(LJ N)55@?@A-(D<5@=@<J5(=<()--(
)-1@J@5=K)=@FA(5A KA=)KM(\]1)M<K,()=(Q@NN^,(?)(
@J=ANN@OAJ A()J)NM5=,(?)(5AJ@<K(@J=ANN@OAJ A()J)NM5=,(
)J-(?)(5LDAKF@5<KM(@J=ANN@OAJ A()J)NM5=()J-(=<(
AN@1@J)=A(=>A(D<5@=@<J(=@=NA5(<?( >@A?(5AKF@ A(<??@ AK,(
?)(DL2N@ (5)?A=M()J)NM5=,(?)(5AJ@<K(DL2N@ (5)?A=M(
)J)NM5=,(=K)J5@=( <<K-@J)=<K,()J-(=K)J5@=(1)J)OAK(
\]?@K5=(KA)-@JO^(\];R7(F<=A(KAYL@KA-^
I*'#"! *+ ',! ,!$0#() :$/ )#5!( #( $""*04$("! :#', %!)$% 0!^.#0!6!('/2 $(4 ',! ,!$0#() :$/ ,!%4 *( ',!
4$'! $(4 (* !$0%#!0 ',$( ',! '#6! / !"#+#!4 #( ',! (*'#"!D
&$1*0 $%$/ * !(!4 ',! .>%#" ,!$0#()D \],!0! >!#() (* 6!6>!0/ *+ ',! .>%#" :,* :#/,!4 '* / !$H2
&$1*0 $%$/ "%*/!4 ',! .>%#" ,!$0#()D
#$%&!'(!#)*+ !,$-% !"6
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 17
!" #&-6 '+,, -."+ -& ,*"/"01($ D&-,"B; "94B2
7( 0!/ *(/! '* $ ^.!/'#*( +0*6 ;*.("#%6!6>!0 ).#%$02 ;#'1 &$($)!0 -$%>!0' /'$'!4 ',$' 0!$/*($>%!
0!/*%.'#*( *+ ',! *()*#() !6 %*1!! (!)*'#$'#*(/ :*.%4 (*' #6 $"' ',! >.4)!'D 8! .'1 ;#'1 &$($)!0
N$",$4**0#$( /'$'!4 ',$' ',! 0* */!4 >.4)!' #("%.4!4 ',! $44#'#*( *+ _DF@ */#'#*(/ #( ',! )!(!0$% +.(4
>.4)!'2 :,#", 0!/.%'!4 #( $ (!' #("0!$/! *+ ':* */#'#*(/ ;#'1:#4!2 4.! '* */#'#*(/ >!#() '0$(/+!00!4
:#',#( ',! >.4)!'/D
&$1*0 $%$/ $((*.("!4 ',$' ;*.("#%6!6>!0 &";$(( :*.%4 $>/'$#( +0*6 5*'#() *( 7'!6 YOJ2 /,!
:*.%4 $>/'$#( +0*6 5*'#() *( 7'!6 YO;2 ;*.("#%6!6>!0 ).#%$0 :*.%4 $>/'$#( +0*6 5*'#() *( 7'!6 YO82
;*.("#%6!6>!0 &#!/!( :*.%4 $>/'$#( +0*6 5*'#() *( 7'!6 YOM2 $(4 ;*.("#%6!6>!0/ ).#%$0 $(4
&";$(( :*.%4 $>/'$#( +0*6 5*'#() *( 7'!6 YO<D ;#'1 ''*0(!1 G**)#(/ /'$'!4 ',$' ',! $>/'!('#*(/ :!0!
4.! '* *'!('#$% 0* !0'1T0!%$'!4 "*(+%#"'/ *+ #('!0!/'D
= CGKI3="7# #-"X(*"7(@,"8!"0,U& !"+(!#1"?,-*#&**(- "*,6#-@,@"8!" #&-6 '7,78,1"
+6 (-- " %( " #&-6 '"O,*#'& #-"I#*R"94B2/B<4 "94B2/B<; "94B2/B<: "94B2/B<W "
94B2/B<A "M#&* -."=& %#1 !"O,*#'& #-"I#R"94B2/44< "E&66,**#1"=.,-6!"
O,*#'& #-"I#R"94B2/449 "(-@" %,"(8#>,"#1@ -(-6,"SG ,7*"BV="(-@"BVJ" %1#&.%"
BV+T"8,"(@#U ,@ "%,(@ -.*"1,(@ " ,Z "X( >,@R"C%,"7# #-"6(11 ,@"8!" %,"$#''#X -."
># ,3
7(8()* "#+',(2% 3 33+ ,(1! + ,(1"%3% (+ 4(5+#+3
P,*3
9(((
I#3
9(((
=8* ( -3
= CGKI3="7# #-"X(*"7(@,"8!"0,U& !"+(!#1"?,-*#&**(- "*,6#-@,@"8!" #&-6 '7,78,1"
=.& '(1 " %( "O,*#'& #-"I#R"94B2/B<B"SG ,7"BV?T"8,"(@#U ,@ "%,(@ -."1,(@ " ,Z "
X( >,@R"C%,"7# #-"6(11 ,@"8!" %,"$#''#X -."># ,3
;(8()* "#+',(2% 3 33+ ,(1"%3% (+ 4(5+#+3
P,*3
9(((
I#3
6(8(1! +
=8* ( -3
8! .'1 &$1*0 J!(/*.//$( %!4 ',! 5*'#() *( 7'!6 YO;D
= CGKI3="7# #-"X(*"7(@,"8!"0,U& !"+(!#1"?,-*#&**(- "*,6#-@,@"8!" #&-6 '7,78,1"
+6 (-- " %( "O,*#'& #-"I#R"94B2/B<9"SG ,7"BV T"8,"(@#U ,@ "%,(@ -."1,(@ " ,Z "
X( >,@R"C%,"7# #-"6(11 ,@"8!" %,"$#''#X -."># ,3
;(8()* "#+',(2% 3 33+ ,(1! + (+ 4(1"%3%
P,*3
9(((
I#3
=8* ( -3
444A44444
= CGKI3="7# #-"X(*"7(@,"8!" #&-6 '7,78,1"+6 (-- "*,6#-@,@"8!"0,U& !"+(!#1"
?,-*#&**(- " %( "O,*#'& #-"I#R"94B2/B<V"SG ,7"BV0T"8,"(@#U ,@ "%,(@ -."1,(@ "
,Z "X( >,@R"C%,"7# #-"6(11 ,@"8!" %,"$#''#X -."># ,3
;(8(2% 3 33+ ,(1! + ,(1"%3% (+ 4(5+#+3
P,*3
9(((
I#3
6(8()* "#+'
=8* ( -3
= CGKI3="7# #-"X(*"7(@,"8!" #&-6 '7,78,1"+6 (-- "*,6#-@,@"8!" #&-6 '7,78,1"
=.& '(1 " %( "O,*#'& #-"I#R"94B2/B<<"SG ,7"BVFT"8,"(@#U ,@ "%,(@ -."1,(@ " ,Z "
X( >,@R"C%,"7# #-"6(11 ,@"8!" %,"$#''#X -."># ,3
;(8()* "#+',(2% 3 33+ ,(1! + (+ 4(5+#+3
P,*3
9(((
I#3
6(8(1"%3%
=8* ( -3
#$%&!'(!#)*+ !,$-% !""
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 18
!" #&-6 '+,, -."+ -& ,*"/"01($ D&-,"B; "94B2
= CGKI3="7# #-"X(*"7(@,"8!" #&-6 '7,78,1"+ ,*,- "*,6#-@,@"8!"0,U& !"+(!#1"
?,-*#&**(- " %( "O,*#'& #-"I#R"94B2/B<2"SG ,7"BVLT"8,"(@#U ,@ "%,(@ -."1,(@ "
,Z "X( >,@R"C%,"7# #-"6(11 ,@"8!" %,"$#''#X -."># ,3
I(8(2% 3 33+ ,(1"%3% (+ 4(5+#+3
P,*3
9(((
I#3
:(8()* "#+'(+ 4(1! +
=8* ( -3
= CGKI"GCF+E
6789:IT
<J5@-AK)=@<J(<?()DDK<F)N(=<(DLK5LA(=>A(KA?@J)J @JO(
B<R
<?(:99;()J-(:99U( AK=@?@ )=A5(<?(D)K=@ @D)=@<J
)W(KA5<NL=@<J(J<W(:9678679(<?(=>A( @=M( <LJ @N(<?(=>A( @=M(
<?( >LN)(F@5=)(1)P@JO(KAYL@KA-(?@J-@JO5,()L=><K@B@JO(
=>A(AaA L=@<J()J-(-AN@FAKM(<?(-< L1AJ=5(KAN)=@JO(=<(
=>A(5)NA()J-(-AN@FAKM(<?(J<=(=<(Aa AA-(\\;\[,999,999(:967(
KA?LJ-@JO( AK=@?@ )=A5(<?(D)K=@ @D)=@<J,(\] @F@ ( AJ=AK(
DK<SA =^,()J-()L=><K@B@JO()J-(-@KA =@JO( AK=)@J(
) =@<J5(@J( <JJA =@<J(=>AKAQ@=>
2W(KA5<NL=@<J(J<W(:9678996(<?(=>A(DL2N@ (?@J)J @JO(
)L=><K@=M(<?(=>A( @=M(<?( >LN)(F@5=)()DDK<F@JO(=>A(
AaA L=@<J()J-(-AN@FAKM(<?(-< L1AJ=5(@J( <JJA =@<J(
Q@=>(=>A(5)NA()J-(-AN@FAKM(<?(=>A( @=M(<?( >LN)(F@5=)(
:967(KA?LJ-@JO( AK=@?@ )=A5(<?(D)K=@ @D)=@<J,(\] @F@ (
AJ=AK(DK<SA =^(@J()(DK@J @D)N()1<LJ=(J<=(=<(Aa AA-(
\\;\[,999,999()J-()L=><K@B@JO()J-(-@KA =@JO( AK=)@J(
) =@<J5(@J( <JJA =@<J(=>AKAQ@=>
<#($("! $(4 =.0",$/#() &$($)!0 J#%>1 )$5! $ 0!/!('$'#*( *( ',! #'!6D 7( 0!/ *(/! '* ^.!/'#*(/ +0*6
;*.("#%6!6>!0 &#!/!(2 <#($("! $(4 =.0",$/#() &$($)!0 J#%>1 0*5#4!4 #(+*06$'#*( *( ',! 6$'.0#'1
4$'! 0!%$'!4 '* ',! 0* */!4 0!+#($("#()D
= CGKI3="7# #-"X(*"7(@,"8!" #&-6 '7,78,1"+6 (-- "*,6#-@,@"8!" #&-6 '7,78,1"
=.& '(1 " %( " #&-6 '"O,*#'& #-"I#R"94B2/B24"(-@"5&8' 6"L -(-6 -."=& %#1 !"
O,*#'& #-"I#R"94B2/44B"8,"(@#U ,@ "%,(@ -.*"1,(@ " ,Z "X( >,@R"C%,"7# #-"
6(11 ,@"8!" %,"$#''#X -."># ,3
7(8()* "#+',(2% 3 33+ ,(1! + ,(1"%3% (+ 4(5+#+3
P,*3
9(((
I#3
9(((
=8* ( -3
6789:IX <J5@-AK)=@<J(<?()DDK<F)N(=<(DLK5LA(=>A(KA?@J)J @JO(
B2R
<?( AK=)@J( <11LJ@=M(?) @N@=@A5(-@5=K@ =(2<J-5
)W(KA5<NL=@<J(J<W(:9678676(<?(=>A( @=M( <LJ @N(<?(=>A( @=M(
<?( >LN)(F@5=)(1)P@JO(DKAN@1@J)KM(-A=AK1@J)=@<J5()J-(
-A N)K@JO(@J=AJ=@<J(=<(@55LA(KA?LJ-@JO(2<J-5(?<K(
DK<D<5A-(KA)55A551AJ=(-@5=K@ =(J<W(:96786,()J-(
<K-AK@JO()(KAD<K=(=>AKA<J
#$%&!'(!#)*+ !,$-% !".
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 19
!" #&-6 '+,, -."+ -& ,*"/"01($ D&-,"B; "94B2
2W(KA5<NL=@<J(J<W(:967867:(<?(=>A( @=M( <LJ @N(<?(=>A( @=M(
<?( >LN)(F@5=)()DDK<F@JO(=>A(KA)55A551AJ=(KAD<K=()J-(
<J?@K1@JO(KA)55A551AJ=5(Q@=>@J(KA)55A551AJ=(
-@5=K@ =(J<W(:96786
W(KA5<NL=@<J(J<W(:967867I(<?(=>A( @=M( <LJ @N(<?(=>A( @=M(
<?( >LN)(F@5=)()L=><K@B@JO()J-(-@KA =@JO( <1DN@)J A(
Q@=>(=>A(bKA?LJ-@JO() =(<?(6TX;(?<K(6T67(@1DK<FA1AJ=(
) =(2<J-5,c()5(1<-@?@A-,(@J( <JJA =@<J(Q@=>(=>A(
@55L)J A(<?(N@1@=A-(<2N@O)=@<J(KA?LJ-@JO(2<J-5(?<K(=>A(
DLKD<5A(<?(KA?LJ-@JO( AK=)@J(KA)55A551AJ=(-@5=K@ =(
2<J-5
-W(KA5<NL=@<J(J<W(:967867;(<?(=>A( @=M( <LJ @N(<?(=>A( @=M(
<?( >LN)(F@5=)()L=><K@B@JO()J-(DK<F@-@JO(?<K(=>A(
@55L)J A(<?(N@1@=A-(<2N@O)=@<J(KA?LJ-@JO(2<J-5(?<K(
KA)55A551AJ=(-@5=K@ =(J<W(:96786,()DDK<F@JO(=>A(?<K1(
<?(?@5 )N()OAJ=()OKAA1AJ=,(?@K5=(5LDDNA1AJ=)N(2<J-(
@J-AJ=LKA()J-(2<J-(DLK >)5A( <J=K) =()J-(
)L=><K@B@JO(<=>AK() =@<J5(@J( <JJA =@<J(=>AKAQ@=>
AW(KA5<NL=@<J(J<W(:967899:(<?(=>A(2<)K-(<?(-@KA =<K5(<?(
=>A( >LN)(F@5=)(DL2N@ (?@J)J @JO()L=><K@=M()DDK<F@JO(
=>A(?<K1(<?()J(A5 K<Q(-AD<5@=()J-(=KL5=()OKAA1AJ=(
)J-(=>A(=AK1@J)=@<J(<?()J(@JFA5=1AJ=()OKAA1AJ=(2<=>(
DAK=)@J@JO(=<(=>A(-A?A)5)J A()J-(KA-A1D=@<J(<?(=>A(
>LN)(F@5=)(DL2N@ (?@J)J @JO()L=><K@=M(KAFAJLA(
KA?LJ-@JO(2<J-5,(5AK@A5(:997)
?W(KA5<NL=@<J(J<W(:9678677(<?(=>A( @=M( <LJ @N(<?(=>A( @=M(
<?( >LN)(F@5=)() =@JO(?<K(@=5AN?()J-()5(=>A(NAO@5N)=@FA(
2<-M(<?( AK=)@J( <11LJ@=M(?) @N@=@A5(-@5=K@ =5,(
)L=><K@B@JO()J-(DK<F@-@JO(?<K(=>A(@55L)J A(<?(
5AD)K)=A(5AK@A5(<?(KA?LJ-@JO(2<J-5(<K(5DA @)N(=)a(
KA?LJ-@JO(2<J-5,()5()DDN@ )2NA,(?<K(A) >(5L >(
<11LJ@=M(?) @N@=@A5(-@5=K@ =,()DDK<F@JO(=>A(?<K1(<?()(
?@5 )N()OAJ=()OKAA1AJ=,()(2<J-(DLK >)5A( <J=K) =(
?<K(A) >(5AK@A5(<?()L=><K@=M(2<J-5,()J(A5 K<Q(-AD<5@=(
)J-(=KL5=()OKAA1AJ=,()(DKAN@1@J)KM(<??@ @)N(5=)=A1AJ=,(
)J-()(?@K5=(5LDDNA1AJ=)N(2<J-(@J-AJ=LKA(?<K(A) >(
5AK@A5(<?(DK@<K(KA?LJ-@JO(2<J-5()J-()L=><K@B@JO(<=>AK(
) =@<J5(@J( <JJA =@<J(=>AKAQ@=>
#$%&!'(!#)*+ !,$-% !"/
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 20
!" #&-6 '+,, -."+ -& ,*"/"01($ D&-,"B; "94B2
OW(KA5<NL=@<J(J<W(:9678996(<?(=>A(2<)K-(<?(-@KA =<K5(<?(
=>A( >LN)(F@5=)(1LJ@ @D)N(?@J)J @JO()L=><K@=M(
)L=><K@B@JO(=>A(@55L)J A(<?(5DA @)N(=)a(KAFAJLA(
KA?LJ-@JO(2<J-5,(5AK@A5(:967)()J-(KAFAJLA(KA?LJ-@JO(
2<J-5,(5AK@A5(:9672,()DDK<F@JO(=>A(?<K1(<?()(5AD)K)=A(
@J-AJ=LKA(<?(=KL5=,(2<J-(DLK >)5A( <J=K) =,(
DKAN@1@J)KM(<??@ @)N(5=)=A1AJ=()J-( <J=@JL@JO(
-@5 N<5LKA()OKAA1AJ=(?<K(A) >(5AK@A5(<?(5L >(2<J-5,(
)J-()L=><K@B@JO(<=>AK() =@<J5(@J( <JJA =@<J(
=>AKAQ@=>
>W(KA5<NL=@<J(J<W(:967867U(<?(=>A( @=M( <LJ @N,(J<W(
:967899I(=>A(DL2N@ (?@J)J @JO()L=><K@=M,(J<W(:967899:(=>A(
1LJ@ @D)N(?@J)J @JO()L=><K@=M,(J<W(:9678997(=>A(><L5@JO(
)L=><K@=M,()J-(J<W(:9678996(=>A(@J-L5=K@)N(-AFAN<D1AJ=(
)L=><K@=M(<?(=>A( @=M(<?( >LN)(F@5=),(Q)@F@JO(=>A(
?<K1)N( <J5LN=)J=(5ANA =@<J(DK< A55()5(@1DK) =@ )N(
)J-()DDK<F@JO()J()OKAA1AJ=(Q@=>(5=K)-N@JO,(M< ),(
)KN5<J(e(K)L=>(?<K(2<J-()J-(-@5 N<5LKA( <LJ5AN(
5AKF@ A5
<#($("! $(4 =.0",$/#() &$($)!0 J#%>1 )$5! $ 0!/!('$'#*( *( ',! #'!6D
= CGKI3="7# #-"X(*"7(@,"8!" #&-6 '7,78,1"+6 (-- "*,6#-@,@"8!" #&-6 '7,78,1"
=.& '(1 " %( " #&-6 '"O,*#'& #-"I#*R"94B2/B2B "94B2/B29 "94B2/B2V "94B2/B2< "
94B2/B22 "(-@"94B2/B2;\\"5&8' 6"L -(-6 -."=& %#1 !"O,*#'& #-"I#*R"94B2/449"(-@"
94B2/44V\\"+&- 6 U('"L -(-6 -."=& %#1 !"O,*#'& #-"I#*R"94B2/44B"(-@"94B2/449\\"
M#&* -."=& %#1 !"O,*#'& #-"I#R"94B2/442\\"(-@"G-@&* 1 ('"0,>,'#U7,- "
=& %#1 !"O,*#'& #-"I#R"94B2/44B"8,"(@#U ,@ "%,(@ -.*"1,(@ " ,Z "X( >,@R"C%,"
7# #-"6(11 ,@"8!" %,"$#''#X -."># ,3
7(8()* "#+',(2% 3 33+ ,(1! + ,(1"%3% (+ 4(5+#+3
P,*3
9(((
I#3
9(((
=8* ( -3
GCP"+=I=JFO\]E"OF5KOCE
\],!0! :!0! (*(!D
D
#$%&!'(!#)*+ !,$-% !"0
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 21
!" #&-6 '+,, -."+ -& ,*"/"01($ D&-,"B; "94B2
+=PKO\]E"OF5KOCE
6789:;\[
K)=@?@ )=@<J(<?()DD<@J=1AJ=5(=<(=>A(?<NN<Q@JO(2<)K-5(
B;R
e( <11@55@<J5d
f1+'" (<'3 ,(>"3/ '"!(D'%3%'E+/" ( $$"33"
f) +(K /g(K &#%3,(> 3" *()4E"3 '0( $$"33"
= CGKI3="7# #-"X(*"7(@,"8!"0,U& !"+(!#1"?,-*#&**(- "*,6#-@,@"8!" #&-6 '7,78,1"
+6 (-- " %( " %,"(8#>,"(UU# - 7,- *"8,"1( $ ,@ "%,(@ -."1,(@ " ,Z "X( >,@R"C%,"
7# #-"6(11 ,@"8!" %,"$#''#X -."># ,3
7(8()* "#+',(2% 3 33+ ,(1! + ,(1"%3% (+ 4(5+#+3
P,*3
9(((
I#3
9(((
=8* ( -3
6789:;U <J5@-AK)=@<J(<?()DDK<F)N(<?()J(@J=AK@1()DD<@J=1AJ=(
B:R
DK< A55(?<K( AK=)@J( <11@55@<J5(=>)=(KAYL@KA(?LNN(
<LJ @N(@J=AKF@AQ5(\]OK<Q=>(1)J)OA1AJ=(<FAK5@O>=(
<11@55@<J,(D)KP5()J-(KA KA)=@<J( <11@55@<J,(
DN)JJ@JO( <11@55@<J,()J-(=Q<(5A)=5(<J(=>A( @F@N(
5AKF@ A( <11@55@<J^
;#'1 ''*0(!1 G**)#(/ 0*5#4!4 #(+*06$'#*( *( ',! 0* */!4 #('!0#6 $ *#('6!(' 0*"!//D
= CGKI3="7# #-"X(*"7(@,"8!" #&-6 '7,78,1"+ ,*,- "*,6#-@,@"8!" #&-6 '7,78,1"
+6 (-- " %( " %,"G- ,1 7"=UU# - 7,- "51#6,**"$#1" ,1 ( -" #77 ** #-*"C%( "
O,^& 1,"L&''" #&-6 '"G- ,1> ,X*"SJ1#X %"+(-(.,7,- "K>,1* .% " #77 ** #- "
5(1_*"(-@"O,61,( #-" #77 ** #- "5'(-- -." #77 ** #- "(-@" X#"*,( *"#-" %,"
> '"E,1> 6," #77 ** #-T"8,"(@#U ,@ "%,(@ -."1,(@ " ,Z "X( >,@R"C%,"7# #-"
6(11 ,@"8!" %,"$#''#X -."># ,3
7(8()* "#+',(2% 3 33+ ,(1! + ,(1"%3% (+ 4(5+#+3
P,*3
9(((
I#3
9(((
=8* ( -3
&$1*0 $%$/ $((*.("!4 ',! . "*6#() >*$04 $(4 "*66#//#*( 0!"*)(#'#*( !5!(' *( U.(! E`2 EBY@D ,!
$%/* / *H! 0!)$04#() ',! 0!"!(' a%16 #" \]0$#(#() ;!('!0X/ EB', $((#5!0/$01 !5!(' $(4 ',! . "*6#()
!"#$% a%16 #"/D
KNI GH+F+?FOE\]" K++FICE
8! .'1 &$1*0 J!(/*.//$( / *H! 0!)$04#() ',! ;#'1X/ 0'/ &$/'!0 =%$( $(4 4#/'0#>.'!4 "* #!/ *+ $
0! *0' *( ',! !"*(*6#" #6 $"' ',! $0'/ ,$5! *( ',! $( 8#!)* 0!)#*(D
;*.("#%6!6>!0 ).#%$0 / *H! 0!)$04#() ',! 0!"!(' ;,.%$ ?#/'$ =*%#"! <*.(4$'#*(X/ $((.$% +.(40$#/!0D
,! $%/* / *H! 0!)$04#() ',! a%16 #" \]0$#(#() ;!('!0 $(4 #'/ / *(/*0/,# *+ ',! =*%#"! <*.(4$'#*( $(4
*',!0 "*66.(#'1 *0)$(#L$'#*(/D
;*.("#%6!6>!0 &";$(( / *H! 0!)$04#() ',! ;,.%$ ?#/'$ =*%#"! <*.(4$'#*(X/ $((.$% +.(40$#/!0 $(4
0!"*)(#L!4 ',! a%16 #" \]0$#(#() ;!('!0 +*0 #'/ EB', $((#5!0/$01D
D
#$%&!'(!#)*+ !,$-% !"1
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 22
!" #&-6 '+,, -."+ -& ,*"/"01($ D&-,"B; "94B2
HKEF0"EFEEGKI
D '3 + /(/ (K%3 # /" (J W(6I\[9U(+ 4( !"#(D #"!0(J W(I;U89I,(<VV"!"+#(1" /%3(+ 4(
'%! '43( V(+!/" (/+h% (4 '" *( # 3%4(5%33" 3(+'%($+" /+" %4(&0(/g%( "/0()// ' %0W
6789:77 <J?AKAJ A(Q@=>(N)2<K(JAO<=@)=<K5(DLK5L)J=(=<(
BWR
O<FAKJ1AJ=( <-A(5A =@<J(7;T7\[WU
)*% !0(4%3"* +/%4('%.'%3% /+/"E%3d((O+'0(>+#&%'/,(P%##%0(2+! ,(1+'"+(
P+!g+4 '"+ ,(O#% (O *" 3,( '/ %0(2+''%//,(A'" (-%$.3/%',() *%#"!+(
)* "#+',(=%33+(J* 0% ,(+ 4(5"$ (5"#E+
A$.# 0%%( '*+ "C+/" 3d(( FA)R5A@L(N !+#(::6,(1"481+ +*%'3RD' V(
)33 !"+/" R5A@L(N !+#(::6,(+ 4(Q%3/%' ( !"#( V(A *" %%'3(\]Q A^
= CGKI3I#"1,U#1 (8',"(6 #-R
6789::T <J?AKAJ A(Q@=>(NAO)N( <LJ5AN88)J=@ @D)=A-(N@=@O)=@<J
BAR
5"* "V"!+ /(%i. 3 '%(/ (#"/"*+/" (. '3 + /(/ (O E%' $% /( 4%(5%!/" (
7;T7UWT(\]4^\]:^
< %( +3%d((@'$+(>%''%'+
= CGKI3=6 #-"X ''"8,"1,U#1 ,@"X %" %,"$ -(' `( #-"#$" %,"*, ',7,- "(.1,,7,- R
=0DKNOI+FIC
' _AYF D6D2 &$1*0 $%$/ $49*.0(!4 ',! 6!!'#() '* ',! 3!).%$0 ;#'1 ;*.("#% &!!'#() *( U.%1 Yb2 EBY@2
$' @ABB D6D2 #( ',! ;*.("#% ;,$6>!0/D
jjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj
P%''0(PW(2"*%# G,()33"3/+ /( "/0( #%'h
#$%&!'(!#)*+ !,$-% !"2
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 23
City of Chula Vista
Staff Report
File#:15-0413, Item#: 2.
ORDINANCEOFTHECITYOFCHULAVISTAAMENDINGCHAPTER19.02OFTHECHULA
VISTAMUNICIPALCODEBYADDINGSECTION19.02.060RELATEDTOINDEMNITY
PROVISIONS FOR CITY ISSUED PERMITS(SECOND READING)
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Council adopt the ordinance.
SUMMARY
Asaconditionofpermitissuance,theCityrequiresapplicantstodefend,indemnifyandholdtheCity
harmlessfromrisksassociatedwiththeissuanceofsuchpermitsandactionsassociatedtherewith.
This ordinance will codify this practice.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
TheDevelopmentServicesDirectorhasreviewedtheproposedactivityforcompliancewiththe
CaliforniaEnvironmentalQualityAct(CEQA)andhasdeterminedthattheproposedactionisnota
"Project"asdefinedunderSection15378(a)oftheStateCEQAGuidelinesbecausetheactivityhas
nopotentialforresultinginadirectphysicalchangeintheenvironmentorareasonablyforeseeable
indirect physical change in the environment.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
Not Applicable
DISCUSSION
TheCaliforniaConstitutioninarticleXI,§7,authorizesa“countyorcitymaymakeandenforcewithin
itslimitsalllocal,police,sanitary,andotherordinancesandregulationsnotinconflictwithgeneral
laws.”Thisauthorityistermed“policepower.”Landdevelopmentanduseisatraditionalsubjectfor
theexerciseofpolicepowerbyacity.Oneaspectoflanddevelopmentistheissuanceofpermitsto
landownersanddevelopers.Intheissuanceofpermits,acityincurscertaindirectcosts,suchas
thoseforprocessingandinspection,andthelawpermitsthecitytorequireapplicantsandproperty
ownerstoreimbursethecityforthesecosts.Therearealsoindirectcoststhatacitymayincur,such
asthoseassociatedwithchallengestotheissuanceofthepermitoractionsofanapplicantor
propertyownerassociatedtherewith.Throughindemnityprovisions,thecitymayrequirethatthe
applicantandpropertyownerbearthesecosts,ratherthanhavethecostsbebornebythegeneral
taxpayers.
Certaininsurancepoliciescontainlanguageexcludingcoverageforindemnityobligationsthatare
conditionsofapermitunlessthecityhasanordinancepermittingthecitytorequireanapplicantto
indemnifythecity.Thisordinanceisintendedtoassistapplicantsinobtaininginsurancefortheir
projectsinthosesituationswheretheywouldotherwisenotbeabletoacquireitandtoprotectthe
cityanditstaxpayersfromriskassociatedwithpermitissuance.Indemnityobligationsthatthecity
City of Chula VistaPage 1 of 2Printed on 7/16/2015
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 24
File#:15-0413, Item#: 2.
obtains that are insured are better than those that are uninsured.
DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT
Staffhasreviewedthedecisioncontemplatedbythisactionandhasdeterminedthatitisnotsite
specificandconsequently,the500-footrulefoundinCaliforniaCodeofRegulationssection18704.2
(a)(1),isnotapplicabletothisdecision.Staffisnotindependentlyaware,andhasnotbeeninformed
byanyCityCouncilmember,ofanyotherfactthatmayconstituteabasisforadecisionmakerconflict
of interest in this matter.
LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS
TheCity’sStrategicPlanhasfivemajorgoals:OperationalExcellence,EconomicVitality,Healthy
Community,StrongandSecureNeighborhoodsandaConnectedCommunity.Thisactionpromotes
theCity’sgoalofOperationalExcellenceasitwillimprovetheCity’spermitprocessandassist
applicants with their ability to obtain insurance for their projects.
CURRENT YEAR FISCAL IMPACT
Thereisnofiscalimpactrelatedtotheadoptionofthisordinance.Thisordinancecodifiesthe
practiceoftheCityrequiringapplicantstodefend,indemnifyandholdtheCityharmlessfromrisks
associatedwiththeissuanceofCitypermits.Itisintendedtoassistapplicantsinobtaininginsurance
fortheirprojectsinthosesituationswheretheywouldotherwisenotbeabletoacquireitandto
protect the city and its taxpayers from risk associated with permit issuance.
ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT
Thereisnoongoingfiscalimpactrelatedtotheadoptionofthisordinance.Goingforward,adoptionof
thisordinanceisintendedtoprotectthecityanditstaxpayersfromriskassociatedwithpermit
issuance.ThisordinancewillcodifythepracticeoftheCityrequiringapplicantstodefend,indemnify
and hold the City harmless from risks associated with the issuance of City permits.
ATTACHMENTS
Staff Contact: David Miller, Deputy City Attorney
City of Chula VistaPage 2 of 2Printed on 7/16/2015
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 25
SECOND READING AND ADOPTION
ORDINANCE NO.
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING
CHAPTER 19.02 OF THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE
BY ADDING SECTION 19.02.060 RELATED TO INDEMNITY
PROVISIONSFORCITY ISSUED PERMITS
WHEREAS, the California Constitution in article XI, §7, authorizes a “county or city
may make and enforce within its limits all local, police, sanitary, and other ordinances and
regulations not in conflict with general laws.” This authority is termed “police power”; and
WHEREAS, Land development and use is a traditional subject for the exercise of police
power by a city; and
WHEREAS, one aspect of land development is the issuance of permits to land owners
and developers.
WHEREAS, in the issuance of permits, a city incurs certain direct costs, such as those for
processing and inspection, and the law permits the city to require applicants and property owners
to reimburse the city for these costs; and
WHEREAS, there are also indirect costs that a city may incur, such as those associated
with challenges to the issuance of the permit or actions of an applicant or property owner
associated therewith; and
WHEREAS, through indemnity provisions, the city may require that the applicant and
property owner bear these costs, rather than have the costs be borne by the general taxpayers;
and.
WHEREAS, it has come to the attention of the City Attorney’s Office that certain
insurance policies contain language excluding coverage for indemnity obligationsthat are
conditions of a permit unless the city has an ordinance permitting the city to require an applicant
to indemnify the city; and
WHEREAS, this ordinance is intended to assist applicants in obtaining insurance for their
projects in those situations where they would otherwise not be able to acquire it and to protect
the city and its taxpayers from risk associated with permit issuance.
NOW THEREFORE the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does ordain as follows:
Section I.Amendment to Chapter 19.02 –General Provisions
Chapter 19.02 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code shall be amended to includeSection
19.02.060,which shall read as follows:
19.02.060 –Indemnity Provisions in City Permits.
C:\\Users\\GRANIC~1\\AppData\\Local\\Temp\\BCL Technologies\\easyPDF 7\\@BCL@540575C0\\@BCL@540575C0.doc
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 26
Ordinance
Page 2
In the issuance of permits, the City may require property owners and applicants to
indemnify, protect, defend and hold City, its City Council members, officers, employees and
representatives, harmless from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands,
claims, expenses, and costs, including court costs and attorney’s fees (collectively, Liabilities)
incurred by the City arising, directly or indirectly, from any challenge to the City’s approval and
issuance of such permits and any actions taken or conduct by property owner or applicant in
connection therewith. Such requirement shall be on terms approved as to form by the City
Attorney and may include other terms deemed necessary or appropriate to protect the City from
special risks related to business operations under the permit not specifically identified herein.
Section II.Severability
If any portion of this Ordinance, or its application to any person or circumstance, is for
anyreason held to be invalid, unenforceable or unconstitutional, by a court of competent
jurisdiction, that portion shall be deemed severable, and such invalidity, unenforceability or
unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining portions of the
Ordinance, or its application to any other person or circumstance. The City Council of the City of
Chula Vista hereby declares that it would have adopted each section, sentence, clause or phrase
of this Ordinance, irrespective of the fact that any one or more other sections, sentences, clauses
or phrases of the Ordinance be declared invalid, unenforceable or unconstitutional.
Section III. Construction
TheCity Council of the City of Chula Vista intends this Ordinance to supplement, not to
duplicateor contradict, applicable state and federal law and this Ordinance shall be construed in
light of that intent.
Section IV. Effective Date
This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force on the thirtieth day after its final passage.
Section V. Publication
The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause
the same to be published or posted according to law.
Presented byApproved as to form by
_________________________________________________________________________
Glen R. GooginsGlen R. Googins
City AttorneyCity Attorney
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 27
City of Chula Vista
Staff Report
File#:15-0414, Item#: 3.
ORDINANCEOFTHECITYOFCHULAVISTAAMENDINGTHESALTCREEKSEWERBASIN
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE (SECOND READING)
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Council adopt the ordinance.
SUMMARY
ThecurrentSaltCreekSewerBasinDevelopmentImpactFee(DIF)planwaspreparedin2004
(2004DIF).Sincethattime,theCityhashadchangesinplanneddevelopmentandwastewaterflow
projections.This2015SaltCreekSewerBasinDevelopmentImpactFeeUpdateaccountsforsaid
impacts within the Salt Creek basin.
The“2015SaltCreekSewerBasinDevelopmentImpactStudy”(2015DIF),conductedonbehalfof
theCitybyBartleWellsAssociatesandInfrastructureEngineeringCorporation,ensuresthata)fees
arefairlyandequitablydistributedamongtheremainingpropertieswithinthebenefitarea;b)
sufficientfundingisavailabletocompletetherequiredimprovements;andc)updatedfundbalance
and land use projections are reflected in the program.
The2015DIFrecommendsmaintainingthesewerfeeatitscurrentlevelof$1,330perequivalent
dwelling unit (EDU). With this action, the City Council will consider:
(i)Accepting the 2015 DIF;
(ii)Modifying the DIF as recommended in the 2015 DIF.
The public hearing has been duly noticed.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
TheDevelopmentServicesDirectorhasreviewedtheproposedactivityforcompliancewiththe
CaliforniaEnvironmentalQualityAct(CEQA)andhasdeterminedthattheproposedactionsarenota
"Project"asdefinedunderSection15378(b)(4)oftheStateCEQAGuidelinesbecausetheactivity
consistsofacceptingthe2015SaltCreekSewerBasinDIFStudyandmodifyingtheDIFin
accordancewiththeStudy.Althoughenvironmentalreviewisnotnecessaryatthistime,when
projectscoveredbytheDIFhavebeendefined,environmentalreviewwillberequiredandaCEQA
determination completed prior to commencing any of the improvements identified in the DIF.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
Not Applicable.
DISCUSSION
Intheoriginal1994basinplan,theproposedSaltCreekInterceptorwasidentifiedasmorethan13.5
City of Chula VistaPage 1 of 6Printed on 7/16/2015
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 28
File#:15-0414, Item#: 3.
milesofsewerlinetoservethebenefitarea,includingtheareanowknownastheWolfCanyon
Basin.TheSaltCreekInterceptorgenerallybeginsjustwestoftheUpperOtayReservoir,and
ultimatelytiesintotheCityofSanDiego’sMetroSewerlinejustwestofInterstate5nearMainStreet.
Thetrunklineisdividedintonine(9)sectionsor“reaches”whicharepointsofslopechangeor
connections with other major tributary sewer lines (Attachment 1).
SinceestablishingtheDIF,allreachesoftheSaltCreekInterceptorasdefinedintheoriginalbasin
planhavebeenconstructed.However,throughadditionalstudiescompletedsince1994,other
facilities have been identified that will be needed to facilitate future development within the basin.
In2004,theCityupdatedtheSaltCreekDevelopmentImpactFee(DIF)to$1,330perequivalent
dwellingunit(EDU)toensuresufficientfundingwasavailablefortheconstructionoftheSaltCreek
InterceptorandfutureWolfCanyonsewerfacilities.Sincethattime,theCityhashadvarious
changesinplanneddevelopment.Inaddition,reducedflowsofapproximately10%duetowater
conservationeffortshavehadanimpactonwastewaterdischarged.Therefore,aDIFupdateto
include these additional improvements in the list of DIF eligible facilities was needed.
TheCityretainedBartleWellsAssociatesandInfrastructureEngineeringCorporationtopreparethe
“2015SaltCreekSewerBasinDevelopmentImpactFeeStudy”(2015DIF)(Attachment2)completed
inApril2015.The2015DIFrecommends:a)feesthatarefairlyandequitablydistributedamongthe
remainingpropertieswithinthebenefitarea;b)thatsufficientfundingisavailabletocompletethe
requiredimprovements;andc)thatanupdatedfundbalanceandlanduseprojectionsarereflectedin
the program.
Current Fee
In2004,theCityCounciladoptedOrdinance2974settingtheSaltCreekDIFat$1,330perEDU.
The2004DIFindicated$36.9millionofcostsassociatedwiththeSaltCreekInterceptorand
estimatedcostsoffutureWolfCanyonsewerfacilities.Theestimatednetcostof$34.1million($36.9
millionless$2.8millionofavailablereserves)wasspreadamongthe25,668remainingbenefited
EDUs within the basin resulting in a fee of $1,330/EDU.
Current Project Status
Since1994,allreachesoftheSaltCreekInterceptorincludedintheoriginalbasinplanhavebeen
constructed.ThelastoftheoriginalDIFfacilitiessuchasReaches3,4A,5B,6,7,8Band9Awere
constructed by the City in 2004.
The2004DIFcontemplatedadditionalimprovementswithintheWolfCanyonbasinthatwouldbe
neededtoservethesouthwesternedgeofthebasinlocatedwestoftheSR-125.These
improvementsarereferredtoastheRockMountainRoad/MainStreetandHeritageRoadtrunk
sewersshowninAttachment1.ThealignmentofRockMountainRoad/MainStreetisstillbeing
developedandHeritageRoadisunderconstructionatthistime.The2015DIFupdatedtheRock
MountainRoad/MainStreetandHeritageRoadtrunksewercostswiththemostcurrentinformation
available.
MorerecentanalysesbyvariouslandownersandstaffhavedeterminedthattheRockMountain
Road/MainStreettrunksewerwouldbeneededtoservetheVillage4andVillage7properties.
CurrentstudiesforVillage4indicatethatRockMountainRoad/MainStreettrunksewerwillbe
City of Chula VistaPage 2 of 6Printed on 7/16/2015
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 29
File#:15-0414, Item#: 3.
neededtoservethisdevelopment.Additionally,whilecurrentstudiesforVillage7contemplatea
temporarysewermainthroughVillage8West,thepermanentsolutiontoserveVillage4andVillage
7developmentswouldbetheRockMountainRoad/MainStreettrunksewerinMainStreet.The
Village8WestsewerfacilitythatwouldtemporarilyserveVillage7wouldnotbeconsideredaDIF
eligible facility.
ThestretchoftrunksewerservingVillage11iscommonlyreferredtoastheHunteParkway
Extension(Extension).TheExtensionheadseasterlyalongHunteParkwayandsouthtotheSalt
CreekInterceptor.The2015DIFproposestoaddsaidExtension.WhentheSaltCreekDIFwas
establishedin1994,theExtensionwasexpectedtoonlyservetheVillage11development.During
thisupdate,itwasdeterminedthattheExtensionwillactuallyserveVillage11andamajorportionof
theEUCMillenia.Therefore,theExtensionqualifiesasaregionalfacilityservingseveral
developments within the basin and is eligible for inclusion in the 2015 DIF update.
A summary of the Salt Creek DIF facilities costs is shown below in Table 1.
Table 1
Summary of Salt Creek DIF Facilities Construction
Costs
DescriptionDIF Obligation
Completed Reaches$20,667,477
Future Projects Cost
Rock Mountain Rd/Main St$4,838,512
Heritage Road$2,444,130
Hunte Parkway Extension$320,836
Total Cost of Facilities$28,270,955
Remaining Equivalent Dwelling Units
The2004DIFupdateidentified25,668remainingbenefitedEDUswithinthebasin.The2015DIF
analysisindicatesacurrenttotalof20,688remainingbenefitedEDUsatbuildout.Thisaccountsfor
thedevelopmentandrevisedlandusesince2004aswellastheadjustmentsfortheCountyand
University sites described below.
County properties
The2015DIFdoesnotincludetheareasintheCountyknownasVillage13,14and16(County
Areas).TheCountyAreaswerepreviouslyincludedinthe2004DIF.TheCitywillupdatetheDIFto
includetheCountyAreasupontheCity’sapprovalofaSewerTransportationAgreementandthe
requiredtechnicalsewerstudies.BasedonanemailsentbyCountystaffonNovember2014,the
County Areas represent 4,500 EDUs.
Future University and Regional Technology Park Sites
ThefutureUniversitysitewasincludedintheoriginal1994basinplan;however,itwasexcludedin
the2004DIF.ThisupdatewillnowincludetheUniversitysiteandtheareacommonlyknownasthe
RegionalTechnologyPark.ThetotalEDUsplannedfortheUniversityandRegionalTechnology
Park sites is 2,005.
City of Chula VistaPage 3 of 6Printed on 7/16/2015
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 30
File#:15-0414, Item#: 3.
Comparison of DIF studies
The2004DIFincludedhigherfinancingcostsandloweravailablereservestooffsetconstruction
costswhencomparedwiththe2015DIF.The2015DIFincludeshigherprojectcostsfortheRock
Mountain/MainStreetandHeritageRoadTrunkSewerlinesandanewproject-theHunteParkway
Extension.ThenetdecreasetotheDIFcostsisprimarilytheresultoflowerthananticipated
financingcosts.Forthis2015DIF,thecostoffinancingexistingsegments,upsizingexisting
facilities,andconstructingfutureSaltCreeksegmentsisestimatedatapproximately$33.3million,a
decreaseof$3.6millionfromthe2004estimate.Table2providesmoredetailonthechangeincosts
attributabletotheSaltCreekDIFbetween2004and2015.Thefeeisproposedtoremainatthe
same current level of $1,330 per EDU.
Table 2
Comparison of DIF studies
Description2004 Study2015 Study
Facility Cost/Original Principal$19,846,243$20,667,477
Developer Credits$553,472$0
Financing Cost$10,788,873$3,907,952
Outstanding Loan Payments (Subtotal)$31,188,588$24,575,429
Future Project & Other Costs
Rock Mountain Road/Main Street$4,460,000$4,838,512
Heritage Road$1,256,000$2,444,130
Hunte Parkway Extension$0$320,836
Environmental Mitigation$0$1,000,000
DIF Administration$0$120,000
Total$36,904,588$33,298,907
Available Reserve($2,771,042)($5,805,114)
City of Chula VistaPage 4 of 6Printed on 7/16/2015
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 31
File#:15-0414, Item#: 3.
($2,771,042)($5,805,114)
Total$34,133,546$27,493,793
EDUs Total25,66820,668
DIF (Cost/EDU)$1,330$1,330
DIF Construction Cost Index Adjustment
SinceitislikelythatthetimingofpaymentsreceivedfromtheDIFwillnotexactlymatchthetimingof
expenditurestoprovideforfacilities,thefeeneedstobeadjustedannuallytoreflectthetimevalueof
money.Theintentisthatthefeebeequaltotherequiredinvestmentasiftheconstructionwereto
occur at the time of contribution.
DIFfeesshouldbeadjustedregularlytopreventthemfromfallingbehindthecostsofconstructing
new facilities. Several methods can be used for the adjustments, including:
1ENRConstructionCostIndex:EngineeringNews-Record(ENR)magazinepublishes
constructioncostindicesmonthlyforLosAngeles.Thisindexcanbeusedtoestimatethe
changeintheconstructioncostoffacilities.IftheENRIndexhasincreasedbythreepercent
since the last capacity fee adjustment, the capacity fee should be increased by three percent.
2U.S., California, or regional consumer price index.
3Interestrateandborrowingcosts:Theinterestandborrowingcostsfordebtissuedtofinance
sewer capital projects can be added to the capacity fee annually.
TheENRConstructionCostIndexforLosAngeles(ENRCCI)iscurrentlybeingusedastheyearly
adjustmentindicatorfortheCity’sDIFprogramsanditisconsideredagoodstandard.Thisisthe
mostappropriateindexbecauseitdirectlyreflectsconstructioncostsintheregionaleconomy.Staff
recommendsadjustingtheDIFfeeannuallybasedontheyear-over-year(fromJulytoJuly)change
intheENRCCI,tobeeffectiveeachOctober1st.Thischangeisreflectedintheordinancepresented
for the City Council’s consideration with this item.
Coordination with the Development Community
Fromtheinitialstagesofthisproject,staffandconsultantshavestressedtheimportanceof
transparencyandtomakesurethatthedevelopmentcommunity’sconcernsareheardand
respondedtoascomprehensivelyaspossible.StaffandconsultantsmetwithBIAandattendeda
regularmeetingoftheDevelopmentOversightCommitteetobriefdevelopersoftheproposedDIF
fee.Asfollow-up,Citystaffaddresseddevelopers’concernsandcommentsviae-mail.Afinaldraft
of the 2015 DIF was sent to major developers on October 2014.
Recommendations
ToprovideadequatefundingfortheSaltCreekBasinfacilitiesandtopromoteequitybetween
customerswhohavealreadyconnectedtothesystemandfuturecustomers,Staffrecommendsthe
following:
Maintain the current Salt Creek DIF of $1,330 per EDU
Add the Hunte Parkway Extension project cost to the DIF
AsDIFfundsareavailable,transferfundsfromtheSaltCreekDIFtotheTrunkSewerCapital
City of Chula VistaPage 5 of 6Printed on 7/16/2015
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 32
File#:15-0414, Item#: 3.
Reserve Fund to pay off the DIF’s outstanding loans
AdjusttheSaltCreekDIFbytheannualchangeintheEngineeringNewsRecord’s
Construction Cost Index for Los Angeles
DIFfeeswillbereviewedindetaileveryfiveyearsorwhenupdatedinformationisavailableregarding
the actual costs of building all the remaining DIF facilities.
DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT
StaffhasreviewedthepropertyholdingsoftheCityCouncilandhasfoundCouncilMemberJohn
McCannhasrealpropertyholdingswithin500feetoftheboundariesofthepropertywhichisthe
subjectofthisaction.Consequently,pursuanttoCaliforniaCodeofRegulationsTitle2,sections
18700and18705.2(a)(11),thisitempresentsadisqualifyingrealproperty-relatedfinancialconflictof
interestunderthePoliticalReformAct(Cal.Gov’tCode§8700,etseq.)fortheabove-identified
member.
LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS
TheCity’sStrategicPlanhasfivemajorgoals:OperationalExcellence,EconomicVitality,Healthy
Community,StrongandSecureNeighborhoodsandaConnectedCommunity.The2015DIF
supportstheEconomicVitalitygoalintheCity’sStrategicPlan.Itprovidesfundingforplanning
sewer infrastructure of new development, which is a key City function in supporting new growth.
CURRENT YEAR FISCAL IMPACT
ConsultantandstaffcostsincurredpreparingthisreportwereoffsetbySaltCreekSewerDIFfunds.
NoadditionalimpactstotheSaltCreekBasinSewerDIFfundortheGeneralFundareanticipatedto
result from this action.
ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT
WastewaterCapitalImprovementProjectsresultingfromthe2015DIFwillbebudgetedaspartofthe
City's annual Capital Improvement Program and funded from the Salt Creek Basin Sewer DIF funds.
AdoptinganupdatedDIF,includingauthorityforannualindexbasedadjustments,supportsthe
collectionoffundingforwastewatercollectionsystemupgradesandexpansionneededto
accommodate future development within the Salt Creek basin.
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment 1:Salt Creek basin map
Attachment 2:2015 Salt Creek Sewer Basin DIF Study
Staff Contact: Luis Pelayo, Acting Senior Civil Engineer
City of Chula VistaPage 6 of 6Printed on 7/16/2015
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 33
SECOND READING AND ADOPTION
ORDINANCE NO.
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING
THE SALT CREEKSEWERBASIN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT
FEE
WHEREAS, the City's General Plan Land Use and Public Facilities Elements require that
adequate public facilities be available to accommodate increased population created by new
development; and
WHEREAS, new developmentwithin the City of Chula Vista createsadverse impacts
and places additional burdens oncertain existing public facilities; and
WHEREAS, land developers within the City are required to mitigate the impactscreated
by their development by the construction of new facilities or improvement of existing facilities
needed to provide service to their respective developments or by the payment of a fee to finance
their fair share portion of the total cost of such new facilitiesor improvements; and
WHEREAS, sewer facilities are one of the many types of facilities that are impacted by
new development; and
WHEREAS, the impact on sewer facilities has been determined to bein direct
relationship to the amount of population generated by the development or the gross acreage of
the commercial or industrial land in the development; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Creek Sewer Basin (Basin) is that area of landthrough which
wastewater will flow bygravity from just west of the Upper Otay Reservoirinto the Otay River
Valley (which also includes the portion land referred to as “Wolf Canyon Basin”); and
WHEREAS, on December 6, 1994, City Council, by Ordinance No. 2617, approved the
establishment of the Development Impact Fee to pay for sewer improvements within theBasin as
a condition of issuance of building permits; and
WHEREAS, on August 24, 2004, City Council, by Ordinance No. 2974, increased the
Development Impact Fee to $1,330 to cover the costs associated with the financing and
construction of sewer improvements identified in this ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the modification of the Development Impact Fee, applicable to all new
sewer connections, is proposed as a meansof funding the necessary sewer improvements that
will benefit properties within the Basin; and
WHEREAS, consistent with California Government Code Sections 66000, et seq., the
CityCouncil recently caused a study to be conducted to reanalyze and reevaluate theadequacy
of the existingand future Salt Creek sewer facilities to sustain the long-term growth of the Basin,
and further reevaluate and reanalyze the fee necessary to pay for the sewer facilities, which study
C:\\Users\\GRANIC~1\\AppData\\Local\\Temp\\BCL Technologies\\easyPDF 7\\@BCL@5C05F603\\@BCL@5C05F603.doc
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 34
Ordinance
Page 2
was prepared by Bartle Wells Associates, Inc. and is entitled “SaltCreek Sewer Basin
Development Impact Fee Study” (the “Report”)dated June2015; and
WHEREAS, the Report has determined that new development within the Basin will
create adverse impacts on the City's existing sewer facilities, to wit:there are no existing sewers
which can serve gravity sewage flows expected to be generated from new development within
the Basin. This impact must be mitigated by the financing and construction of certain sewer
facilities identified in this ordinance; and
WHEREAS, theReport includes an estimate of ultimate sewer flows anticipated from the
Basin;recommends sewer facilities needed to transport these flows, including additional
facilities known as Rock Mountain Road/Main Street Trunk Sewer, Heritage Road Trunk Sewer,
and Hunte Parkway Extension;and establishes a fee payable by persons obtaining building
permits for developments within theBasin benefiting from the construction of these facilities;
and
WHEREAS, the Reportsupports,and staff recommends,the modification ofthe
Development Impact Feeto require new users within the Basin to fully fund the sewer facilities
required to mitigate their impacts without imposing a burden on existing customers; and
WHEREAS, City staff recommends andthis ordinance establishes, in accordance with
st
the Report, annual adjustments to the fee occurring each October 1, based on the July to July
annual change in the Engineering News-Record Construction Cost Index, for the Los Angeles
areato ensure that the Development Impact Fee is adjusted as new facility construction costs
increase; and
WHEREAS, the Development Services Director has reviewed the proposed activity for
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the
proposed ordinance is not a “Project”as defined under Section 15378(b)(4) of the CEQA
Guidelines because the activity consists of modifying a Development Impact Fee program in
accordance with the Report. Although no environmental review is necessary at this time, when
projects covered by the DIF are further defined, environmental review will be necessary prior to
the commencement of any of the improvements identified in the DIF Program.
NOW THEREFORE the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does ordain as follows:
Section I.
The City Council finds after consideration of the evidence presented to it at the hearing,
including documents, testimony and reports,that:
1.The legislative findings and determinations set forth in the ordinances referred to in the
above recitals continueto be true and correct; and
2.Developers of land within the City should be required to mitigate the burden created by
development through the payment of a fee to finance a development's fair share of the
total cost of the sewer improvements; and
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 35
Ordinance
Page 3
3.The imposition of the Development Impact Fee on all future developments within the
Basin for which building permits have not been issued is necessary in order to protect the
public health, safety and welfare; and
4.The amount of the fee levied by this ordinance does not exceed the estimated reasonable
cost of providing the sewer facilities and service for which the fee is established (i.e.
facilities serving developments within the Basin) in accordance with California
Government Code Section 66005; and
5.Including an annual, indexed adjustment to the impact fee is necessary to ensure the that
the costs of the improvements at the time of construction are more accurately represented
and calculated and that theENR Construction Cost Index for the Los Angeles Area is an
appropriate index to use to estimate the increased costs of construction; and
6.The collection of the Development Impact Fee, established by Ordinance No. 2617, at the
time the building permit is issued is necessary and will ensure that funds will be available
to pay for the financing and construction costs of sewer improvements required within
the Basin; and
Section II. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Findings for Statutory
Exemption
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does herebyfind that the Development
Fee herein imposed is for the purpose of mitigating the financing and constructioncosts
Impact
of those facilities necessary to maintain service within the Basin. The proposed activity does not
involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant
physical impact on the environment. Therefore, the City finds that the adoption of this ordinance
is statutorily exempt under the provisions of CEQA Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3).
Section III.“Facilities”
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby find that the facilities which are subject
matterof the impact Fee are fully described in Table 2of the Report on page 11, attached as
Exhibit 1, and incorporated herein by this reference, (Facilities). The locations at which the
Facilities will be constructed are shown on Figure 1, which is included in the Report. The City
Council may modify or amend the list of projects herein considered to be part of the Facilities
from time to timeby written resolution in order to maintain compliance with the City's Capital
Improvement Program or to reflect changes in land development and estimated and actual
wastewater flow.
Section IV. Territory to Which Fee is Applicable
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby find that the area of the City of Chula
Vistato which the Impact Fee herein established shall be applicable is set forth on Figure 2 of
the Report.
Section V. Adjusting the Development Impact Fee
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 36
Ordinance
Page 4
TheCity Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby find that theamount of the
st
Development Impact Fee shall be adjusted, starting on October l, 2015 and on each October 1
thereafter, based on the one-year change (from July to July) in the Los Angeles Construction
Cost Index as published monthly in the Engineering News Record. Adjustments to the above fee
based upon the Construction Cost Index shall be automatic and shall not require further action of
the City Council.
Section VI.Time Limit for Protest and Judicial Action
Any judicial action or proceeding to attack, review, set aside, void or anuul this
Ordinance shall be brought within the period as established by law.
In accordance with Government Code Section 66022, the 120 period to attack, review, set
aside, void or annul this ordinance shall commence on the effective date of this Ordinance.
Section VII.Severability
If any portion of this Ordinance, or its application to any person or circumstance, is for
anyreason held to be invalid, unenforceable or unconstitutional, by a court of competent
jurisdiction, that portion shall be deemed severable, and such invalidity, unenforceability or
unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining portions of the
Ordinance, or its application to any other person or circumstance. The City Council of the City of
Chula Vista hereby declares that it would have adopted each section, sentence, clause or phrase
of this Ordinance, irrespective of the fact that any one or more other sections, sentences, clauses
or phrases of the Ordinance be declared invalid, unenforceable or unconstitutional.
Section VIII. Construction
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista intends this Ordinance to supplement, not to
duplicateor contradict, applicable state and federal law and this Ordinance shall be construed in
light of that intent.
Section IX. Effective Date
This Ordinance shall become effective sixty (60) days after its second reading and
adoption.
Section X. Publication
The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause
the same to be published or posted according to law.
Presented byApproved as to form by
_________________________________________________________________________
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 37
Ordinance
Page 5
Richard A. HopkinsGlen R. Googins
Director of Public WorksCity Attorney
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 38
0 ¦¤ 39
1
EXHIBIT
Packet
!¦¤£
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ
±
3 «³³#±¤¤¤ª3¤¶¶¤±" ²²¨
$$¤µ¤«®¯¬¬¤³)¬¯ ¢³&¤¤¤3³³´£¸
&¨ «2¤¯¯®±³
*´¤ΑΏΐΔ
BARTLEWWELLSASSOCIATESS
IndependenntPublicFinanceConsulltants
1889AlcatrrazAvenue
Berkeley,Caalifornia94703
www.bartleewells.com
Tel:510/6533399
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 41
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 42
TABLEOFCONTENTS
SECTION1:EXECUTIVESUMMARY............................................................................................1
1.1Background.............................................................................................................1
1.2Purpose...................................................................................................................1
1.3RecommendedDIF..................................................................................................2
1.4LegalOverview........................................................................................................2
SECTION2:INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................4
2.11994WilsonStudy..................................................................................................4
2.22004CityUpdate....................................................................................................4
SECTION3:BASINDESCRIPTION................................................................................................6
3.1BasinArea...............................................................................................................6
3.2SewerageFacilities..................................................................................................6
3.3WastewaterDutyFactors.....................................................................................13
3.4EDUProjections....................................................................................................14
SECTION4:2050BUILDOUTCAPACITYANALYSIS..................................................................18
4.1FlowProjection.....................................................................................................19
4.2HydraulicModelDevelopment.............................................................................21
4.3HydraulicAnalysis.................................................................................................25
4.4CapitalImprovementProgramandCostEstimates..............................................26
SECTION5:DIFANALYSIS.........................................................................................................31
5.1CurrentDIFProgram.............................................................................................31
5.2FeeMethodology..................................................................................................31
5.3ProjectCosts.........................................................................................................32
5.4DeveloperCredits.................................................................................................32
5.5ConstructionFunding............................................................................................33
5.6EnvironmentalMitigation.....................................................................................34
5.7DIFAdministration................................................................................................34
5.8AvailableReserves................................................................................................34
5.9DevelopmentImpactFeeCalculation...................................................................34
5.10DIFComparison.....................................................................................................35
SECTION6:CONCLUSIONS.......................................................................................................37
6.1Recommendations................................................................................................37
6.2Updates.................................................................................................................37
6.3EnvironmentalReview..........................................................................................37
6.4AnnualAdjustment...............................................................................................38
6.5StudyLimitations..................................................................................................38
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 43
APPENDIXA:DevelopmentAreaWastewaterFlow&EDUProjections(RemainingOnly)
APPENDIXB:2050LandUseandWastewaterFlowProjections(ExistingandRemaining
Connections)
APPENDIXC:SaltCreekInterceptor(detail)
APPENDIXD:SaltCreekImprovementPlan
APPENDIXE:ProposedTrunkSewers
APPENDIXF:2050CIPPipelineProposedin2014WWMP
APPENDIXG:2050PWWFModelResultwithExistingPipelineConditions
APPENDIXH:2050PWWFModelResultwithProposedFutureDiameters
APPENDIXI:SaltCreekSewerLateralImprovementsΑBondEstimate
APPENDIXJ:WolfCanyonSewerTrunkFacilities
TABLEOFTABLES
Table1:DIFCalculation..................................................................................................................2
Table2:ListofFacilities................................................................................................................11
Table3:WastewaterDutyFactorComparison.............................................................................13
Table4:EDUConversionFactors..................................................................................................14
Table5:SaltCreekBasinRemainingAcreageandUnits..............................................................15
Table6:ChangeinEDUs...............................................................................................................17
Table7:2050SaltCreekInterceptorWastewaterFlowProjections............................................20
Table8:PipelineUnitCosts..........................................................................................................28
Table9:FutureCapitalImprovementProjectswithCostEstimate.............................................29
Table10:ProjectCosts..................................................................................................................32
Table11:FinancingCost...............................................................................................................33
Table12:DIFCalculation..............................................................................................................35
Table13:DIFComparison.............................................................................................................35
Table14:ComparisonofDIFStudies............................................................................................36
TABLEOFFIGURES
Figure1:StudyArea&ProposedTrunkLines..............................................................................12
Figure2:ExistingandProposedNewDevelopments...................................................................16
Figure3:HunteParkwayExtension..............................................................................................23
Figure4:NormalizedDiurnalCurves............................................................................................24
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 44
SECTION1:ExecutiveSummary
1.1Background
TheCityfirstdevelopedaseweranalysisandbasinplanfortheSaltCreekSewerBasinin1994.
Thepurposeofthebasinplanwastoprojectdevelopmentinthebasin,determinesewer
facilitiesneededtoservedevelopment,andtocalculateanimpactfeetorecoverthecostof
thosefacilities.The1994StudyincludedtheSaltCreekInterceptorReaches1through8ata
totalcostof$8.2million.Atthattime,Reach9wasassumedtobearegionalfacilitythatwould
servecustomersoutsideoftheSaltCreekBasin.ThecostofReaches1through8wasspread
amongnearly29,000equivalentdwellingunits(EDUs)inthebasintocalculateaSaltCreek
SewerBasindevelopmentimpactfee(DIF)of$284perEDU.TheCityadoptedtheDIFwith
OrdinanceNo.2617onDecember6,1994.TheconceptoftheDIFisthatcustomersbenefiting
fromcapitalfacilitiesshouldpaytheirproportionatesharefortheconstructionofthose
facilities.
TheDIFwasrevisedin2004byCitystafftoreflectthefinalconstructioncostoftheSaltCreek
Sewer,toincludeReach9A,theRockMountainRoad/MainStreetandHeritageRoadTrunk
SewerlineslocatedintheWolfCanyonBasin,toadddevelopercreditsandfinancingcosts,and
torevisetheremainingEDUspredictedtodevelopinthebasin.The2004studyincreasedthe
costrecoveredbytheDIFfrom$8.2millionto$34.1millionandadjustedtheremainingEDUs
from28,737to25,668.The2004studyincreasedtheSaltCreekDIFfrom$284to$1,330per
EDU.
1.2Purpose
ThepurposeofthisreportistoupdatetheSaltCreekBasindevelopmentimpactfeeoriginally
establishedin1994andlastupdatedin2004.The2015updateoftheSaltCreekDIFis
necessaryforthefollowingreasons:
Toreflecttheupdateddevelopmentprojections
Toreflecttheupdatedwastewatergenerationratesofvariouslandusetypes
TorevisethelistoffacilitiestobefinancedbytheDIF
ToupdatetheconstructioncostoftheRockMountainRoad/MainStreetandHeritage
RoadTrunkSewers
Toupdatefinancingcosts,developercontributions,environmentalmitigation,and
administrativecosts
1|Page
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 45
1.3RecommendedDIF
TheSaltCreekDIFiscalculatedbasedonthecostsofcapitalfacilitieslessavailableDIFfund
reservesdividedbytheremainingEDUswithinthebasinbenefittingfromthefacilities.The
2015updatedfeeisbasedonthefinalcostoftheSaltCreekInterceptor(Reaches19A)and
estimatedcostsfortheWolfCanyonTrunkSewerlines(RockMountainRoad/MainStreet,
HeritageRoad,andlinesidentifiedinthe2014WastewaterMasterPlanUpdate).Thefeealso
accountsfordevelopercredits,financingcosts,environmentalmitigation,administrativecosts,
andavailablefundreserves.Intotal,$27.5millionincostsareattributabletotheSaltCreek
DIF.Thesecostsaredividedamongstthe20,668EDUsremainingintheSaltCreekSewerBasin.
Table1showstheDIFcalculation.The2015updatedfeeis$1,330andisequaltothecurrent
fee.
Table 1: DIF Calculation
City of Chula Vista
Salt Creek DIF Study
Amount
Cost Category
Outstanding Loan Payments $24,575,429
Future Construction Cost 7,603,478
Outstanding Developer Credits 0
Environmental Mitigation 1,000,000
DIF Administration Cost 120,000
Less: DIF Fund Reserve (5,805,114)
Subtotal $27,493,793
Remaining EDUs 20,668
New DIF (per EDU) $1,330
Note: The City will maintain a loan repayment
reserve of $1.3 million.
1.4LegalOverview
InCalifornia,thebasicstatutorystandardsgoverningwaterandsewercapacityfeesare
embodiedinGovernmentCodeSection66013,66016,and66022(MitigationFeeAct).The
developmentimpactfee,asdescribedinthisreportisessentiallyacapacityfeeattributabletoa
specificdevelopmentareaΑtheSaltCreekBasin.TheSaltCreekDIFisgovernedbythesame
statutoryrequirementsascapacityfeesorconnectionfees.GovernmentCode66013provides
thefundamentalprovisions:
a)Notwithstandinganyotherprovisionsoflaw,whenalocalagencyimposesfeesfor
waterconnectionsorsewerconnections,orimposescapacitycharges,thosefeesor
chargesshallnotexceedtheestimatedreasonablecostofprovidingtheservicefor
2|Page
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 46
whichthefeeorchargeisimposed,unlessaquestionregardingtheamountthefeeor
chargeimposedinexcessoftheestimatedreasonablecostofprovidingtheservicesor
materialsissubmittedto,andapprovedby,apopularvoteoftwothirdsofthose
electorsvotingontheissue.
b)Asusedinthissection
1)ͻ{ĻǞĻƩĭƚƓƓĻĭƷźƚƓͼmeanstheconnectionofabuildingtoapublicsewer
system.
2)ͻğƷĻƩĭƚƓƓĻĭƷźƚƓͼmeanstheconnectionofabuildingtoapublicwater
system,asdefinedinsubdivision(e)ofSection4010.1oftheHealthandSafety
Code.
3)ͻ/ğƦğĭźƷǤĭŷğƩŭĻƭͼmeanschargesforfacilitiesinexistenceatthetimethe
chargeisimposedorchargesfornewfacilitiestobeconstructedinthefuture
whichareofbenefittothepersonorpropertybeingcharged.
4)ͻ\[ƚĭğƌğŭĻƓĭǤͼmeansalocalagencyasdefinedinSection66000.
c)Anyjudicialactionorproceedingtoattack,review,setaside,void,orannulthe
ordinance,resolution,ormotionimposingafeeorcapacitychargesubjecttothis
sectionshallbebroughtpursuanttoSection66022.Section66013indicatesthatany
connectionfeemustbebasedonanestimateofthereasonablecostofproviding
service.Thelegislativehistoryofthisprovisionindicatesthatthelegislaturedidnot
intendtolimitthetypesofcoststhatwouldbeincluded.
3|Page
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 47
SECTION2:Introduction
TheCityofChulaVista(City)provideswastewatercollectionthroughoutitsserviceareaofover
50squaremiles.Theserviceareaiscomprisedof8drainagebasinsthatroutewastewaterflow
throughconnectionstoregionalseweragefacilitieslocatedalongtheSanDiegoBaytothewest
andtheSweetwaterRivertothenorth.Lastyear,theCitycompletedthe2014Wastewater
MasterPlanUpdate(WWMP)whichrevisedthe/źƷǤƭwastewatergenerationratesand
developedaCitywidecapacityfeefornewcustomersconnectingtothewastewatersystem.In
additiontotheCitywidecapacityfee,theCityalsocollectsdevelopmentimpactfees(DIFs)for
drainagebasinspecificfacilities.ThisreportupdatesthedevelopmentimpactfeefortheSalt
CreekBasin.
TheSaltCreekBasinisdefinedastheareaservedbytheSaltCreekInterceptor,a16.5mile
sewerlinethatbeginswestoftheUpperOtayReservoirandultimatelytiesintotheCityofSan
5źĻŭƚƭMetrosewerlinejustwestofInterstate5nearMainStreet.Theinterceptorisdivided
intoninereaches,whicharepointsofslopechangeorconnectionswithothermajortributary
sewerlines.TheWolfCanyonBasinisalsoservedbytheSaltCreekInterceptorandistherefore
consideredpartoftheSaltCreekBasinforengineeringpurposesandfinancialplanning.The
SaltCreekDIFiscollectedfromnewconnectionsinboththeSaltCreekBasinandtheWolf
CanyonBasin.
2.11994WilsonStudy
TheCityfirstcommissionedabasinplanfortheSaltCreekSewerBasinin1994.Thestudywas
performedbyWilsonEngineeringanddefinedthefeebenefitareafromwhichDIFswouldbe
collected.WilsonEngineeringcalculatedtheDIFtoincludeprojectcostsof$8.2million
reflectingReaches1through8.AlthoughtheWolfCanyonSewerBasinwasconsideredpartof
theSaltCreekBasin,noadditionalfacilitieswereenvisionedfortheWolfCanyonBasin.Itwas
assumedthatcustomerscouldconnecttotheSaltCreekInterceptorvialaterals.Wilson
EngineeringdefinedanEDUasgenerating280gallonsperdayofwastewaterflowand
determinedaDIFcustomerbaseof28,737EDUs.The1994StudycalculatedaDIFof$284per
EDU.
2.22004CityUpdate
TheSaltCreekDIFwaslastupdatedin2004bytheCity.The2004Studyupdatedthe1994
WilsonStudytoreflectthefinalconstructioncostoffacilitiesandthefinancingmechanisms
usedbytheCity.Reaches1,2A,and2BwereconstructedbydevelopersattheķĻǝĻƌƚƦĻƩƭ
expense.Thus,the2004Studyincludesdevelopercreditsfortheconstructioncostofthose
4|Page
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 48
Reaches.ThefinalprojectcostofReachesconstructedbytheCity(Reaches3,4A,5B,6,7,8,
and9A)wasupdated.Asavailable,theCityutilizedDIFreservestofundprojectcosts.
However,theCityalsoreliedonloansmadefromtheTrunkSewerCapitalReserveFundtothe
SaltCreekDIFfund.Reaches4Band5AwereconstructedbySanDiegoGasandElectric
(SDG&E)butwerefundedatthe/źƷǤƭexpenseviaaloanfromtheTrunkSewerCapitalReserve
Fund.The2004Studyaddedtheestimatedfinancingcostsassociatedwiththeseloans.The
1994WilsonStudydidnotincludefinancingcosts.
The2004Studyreflectedthe/źƷǤƭrevisedplanforReach9andtheWolfCanyonBasin.Reach
9wasredefinedasReach9A,Reach9B,andReachВ.͵Reach9AwasconsideredtobeaSalt
CreekBasinfacilityandwasincludedintheDIF.Reaches9BandВ.wereconsideredtobe
regionalfacilities.Thesefacilitiesweredescribedinthe2004Studybuttheirprojectcostswere
notincludedintheDIF.ThecostforReaches9BandВ.areobligatedtotheTrunkSewer
CapitalReserveFund.TrunklinesfortheWolfCanyonBasin(RockMountainRoad/MainStreet
andHeritageRoadTrunkSewers)wereaddedtotheDIFatacostof$5.7million.
Fromthe1994WilsonStudytothe2004Study,theDIFcostrecoveryamountwasincreased
from$8.2millionto$34.1milliontoreflecttheactualconstructioncostoffacilities,newfacility
costsforReach9AandtheWolfCanyonBasin,andthefinancingcostsoftheloansfromthe
TrunkSewerCapitalReserveFund.The2004StudydefinedanEDUasgenerating265gallons
perdayofwastewaterflowanddeterminedaDIFcustomerbaseof25,668EDUs.The2004
StudycalculatedaDIFof$1,330perEDU.
Sincetheadoptionofthe2004updatedDIF,theCityhashadvariouschangesinplanned
developmentandreducedflowsduetowaterconservationefforts.Forthisreason,past
infrastructureplanningassumptionsneededtobereexamined.
5|Page
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 49
SECTION3:BasinDescription
3.1BasinArea
TheSaltCreekSewerBasinislocatedintheeasternpartoftheCitywhichconveyswastewater
flowfromEastLake,OtayRanch,RollingHillsRanch,portionsoftheOtayRiverBasin,and
unincorporatedareasnorthandeastoftheOtayLakes.TheSaltCreekBasinincludestheWolf
CanyonSewerBasinlocatedtothesouthwestoftheSaltCreekBasin.
The2004UpdatetotheSewerBasinPlanprovidesthefollowingdescriptionoftheSaltCreek
seweralignment:
TheSaltCreekTrunkSewergenerallybeginsjustwestoftheUpperOtayReservoir,then
proceedssoutherlyparalleltotheSaltCreekandtheOtayValleyRivers,thenturns
WesterlyalongMainStreet,continuingundertheI805FreewayalongMainStreetto
IndustrialBlvd.,afterwhichitgoesunderthe15Freewayandterminatesatajunction
structurethattiesittotheCityofSanDiego'sMetroSewerlinejustwestofInterstate5
onFrontageRoad.ThelinewassegregatedintonineReaches,whichweredivided
primarilyatpointsofmajorslopechangesandlocationswheresignificantamountof
sewageflowfromtributarypropertiesenteredtheline.
3.2SewerageFacilities
1
FacilitiesmakinguptheSaltCreekInterceptoraredescribedbelow.Theinterceptoris
comprisedofReaches1through9AandtheWolfCanyonTrunkSewers.
3.2.1ConstructedbyOthers
Reaches1,2Aand2Bwereconstructedbydevelopersforthebenefitoftheirdevelopment
areas.Thedevelopersconstructedthesefacilitiesattheirowncostanddedicatedthemtothe
Cityinexchangeforcreditsthatcouldbeusedatafuturedatetooffsetothercoststhatthe
developermayowe.The2004BasinPlannoted$553,472indevelopercreditsoutstanding.
Since2004,thedevelopersexpendedtheircreditsandtherearenoremainingcredits.Forthe
2015study,thecostofReaches1,2A,and2Bareincludedasprojectcostsanddeveloper
creditsareshownas$0.
1
Facilitiesdescriptionstakenfromthe2004UpdatetotheSaltCreekSewerBasinPlan
6|Page
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 50
DescriptionsoffacilitiesconstructedbyothersReaches1,2A,2B,4Band5Aareprovided
below.
Reach1
Reach1wasconstructedbyPacificBayHomestoservetheRollingHillsCommunitiesinFiscal
Year(FY)1998.Itconsistsofapproximately4,517linearfeetof15"PVCpipe.Basedonthe
costestimateaprovidedbyPacificBayHomestotheCity,thetotalcostofthisReachincluding
construction,inspectionandadministrationis$173,613.
Reach2
Reaches2Aand2BwereconstructedbytheEastlakeCompanytoserveEastlakeTrails
NorthCommunityinFY2001.DetailedcostestimatesforReaches2Aand2Bareprovidedasan
appendixtothe2004UpdatetotheSaltCreekSewerBasinPlan.
Reach2Aconsistsof2,204linearfeetof18"PVC.Basedonthecostestimateandaddendums
providedbytheEastlakeCompanytotheCity,thetotalcostofthisReachincluding
construction,inspectionandadministrationis$112,199.
Reach2BwasconstructedbyEastlakeCompanytoserveEastlakeTrailsSouthcommunity.It
consistsof2,327feetof18"PVCpipe.Reach2BcurrentlyendsattheOlympicParkwayPump
Station.BasedonthecostestimateandaddendumsprovidedbytheEastlakeCompanytothe
City,thetotalcostofthisReachincludingconstruction,inspectionandadministrationis
$267,660.
Reach4B
Reaches4Band5AwereconstructedbySanDiegoGasandElectricbutwerefundedbythe
City.Atthetimeofconstruction,SaltCreekDIFfundswerenotavailablesotheCityissueda
loanfromtheTrunkSewerCapitalReserveFundtotheSaltCreekDIF.Theloanusedtofund
Reaches4Band5AisstilloutstandingandisincludedintheDIFcalculation.
Reach4BwasconstructedbySDG&EaspartofajointprojectwiththeCityofChulaVista.
SDG&Ewasreimbursed$341,509forthissegment.ThisReachconsistsof2,608linearfeet
of24"PVCpipe.FortheengineeringdesignforReaches4Band5A,theCitypaidatotalof
$58,814.Ofthisamount,$33,883wasexclusivelyforthedesignofReach4B.Thetotalcost
forReach4B,includingconstruction,design,inspectionandadministration,is$390,422.
7|Page
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 51
Reach5A
Reach5Aconsistsof1,919linearfeetof24"PVCpipeandwasalsoconstructedbySan
DiegoGas&Electric(SDG&E)aspartofthejointprojectwiththeCityofChulaVista.The
totalreimbursedtoSDG&EfortheconstructionofReach5Awas$251,286.TheCitypaid
$24,931forthedesignservicesforthisReach.ThetotalcostforReach5A,including
construction,engineeringservices,inspectionandadministration,is$287,278.
3.2.2ConstructedbyCity
Reaches3,4A,5B,6,7,8,and9wereconstructedbytheCityandaredescribedbelow.
Reach3
Reach3consistsof2,391linearfeet(L.F.)ofdual20"PVCand194L.F.ofsingle20"PVC
pipe.Reach3beginsattheOlympicParkwayPumpStationandterminatesatthenortherly
portionofReach4A.ThisReachcost$1,526,107.
Reach4A
Reach4Aconsistsof3,452L.F.ofdual24"PVC,562L.F.ofsingle24"PVCand2,310L.F.
10"PVCpipe.ThetotalcostforReach4Ais$2,921,271.
Reach5B
Reach5Bconsistsof3,654L.F.of30"PVCpipe.TheconstructioncostforReach5Bis
$1,295,895;thiscostincludesconstruction,engineeringservices,inspectionand
administration.
Reach6
ThecostforReach6,includingconstruction,engineeringservices,inspectionand
administration,is$973,024.Reach6consistsof2,924linearfeetof30"PVCpipe.
Reach7
Reach7consistsof8,420L.F.of36"PVCpipe.Thecost,includingconstruction,
engineeringservices,inspectionandadministration,forReach7is$3,222,772.
Reach8
Reach8Aconsistsof2,542linearfeetof42"PVCpipeandhasacost,includingconstruction,
engineeringservices,inspectionandadministration,of$1,218,959.
Reach8Bconsistsof3,952linearfeetof42"PVC;ithasacost,includingconstruction,
engineeringservices,inspectionandadministration,of$1,895,193.
8|Page
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 52
Reach9
Reach9isthefinalsegmentoftheSaltCreekInterceptor,whichconnectsthesystemtothe
existing72"CityofSanDiegoMetroSewerInterceptoronWestFrontageRoad.Reach9
consistsofapproximately26,300linearfeetof42"and48"PVC.Thetotalcost,including
construction,engineeringservices,inspectionandadministrationis$17,709,228.
Toexpeditetheconstructionofthistrunkline,Reach9wasfurtherdividedinto3subreaches,
Reaches9A,9Band9B'.Reach9Aconsistsofapproximatelyof1,500linearfeetof42"PVCand
9,400linearfeet45"PVCtotaling10,900linearfeetandcost$6,115,322toconstruct.Reaches
9BandВ.areregionalfacilitiesbenefittingcustomersbothinsideandoutsidethebasin.
Reaches9BandВ.werefundedwithTrunkSewerCapitalReserveFunds.ThecostofReach9A
isincludedintheSaltCreekDIFcalculation;Reaches9BandВ.areregionalfacilitiesandtheir
costsarenotrecoverablethroughtheSaltCreekDIF.
WolfCanyonTrunkSewer
The2004DIFcontemplatedadditionalimprovementswithintheWolfCanyonbasinthatwould
beneededtoservethesouthwesternedgeofthebasinlocatedwestoftheSR125.These
improvementsarereferredastheHeritageRoadtrunksewerlinesandtheRockMountain
Road/MainStreettrunksewer.ThealignmentofRockMountainRoad/MainStreettrunksewer
isstillbeingdevelopedandHeritageRoadisunderconstructionatthistime.This2015Study
updatedtheHeritageRoadandRockMountainRoad/MainStreettrunksewercostswiththe
mostcurrentinformationavailable.Section4.4:CapitalImprovementProgramandCost
EstimatesprovidesadescriptionanddetailedcostestimatefortheWolfCanyonTrunkSewer.
Intotal,theWolfCanyonTrunkSewerprojectedcostis$7,282,642.
MorerecentanalysesbyvariouslandownersandstaffhavedeterminedthattheRock
MountainRoad/MainStreettrunksewerwouldbeneededtoservetheVillage4andVillage7
properties.CurrentstudiesforVillage4indicatethatRockMountainRoad/MainStreettrunk
sewerwillbeneededtoservethisdevelopment.Additionally,whilecurrentstudiesforVillage
7contemplateatemporarysewermainthroughVillage8West,thepermanentsolutionto
serveVillage4andVillage7developmentswouldbetheRockMountainRoad/MainStreet
trunksewerinMainStreet.
AdditionalDIFEligibleFacilities
ThestretchoftrunksewerservingVillage11iscommonlyreferredtoastheHunteParkway
Extension(Extension).TheExtensionheadseasterlyalongHunteParkwayandsouthtotheSalt
CreekInterceptor.
9|Page
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 53
In2008,astudypreparedbyPBS&JrecommendedthatalargerportionoftheEUCMilleniabe
gradedtodraintoacentrallylocateddiversionstructure.Thestudyrecommendedthatthe
diversionstructurewouldserveasaninterimsolutiontoseweralargerportionoftheEUCby
gravitytoHunteParkwayuntiltheconstructionoftheRockMountainRoad/MainStreetTrunk
Sewerwascompleted.Thestudyalsorecommendedapermanentsolutionfollowingthe
existingsewersystemthroughtheneighboringVillage7developmentultimatelyconnectingto
theRockMountainRoad/MainStreetTrunkSewer.
MorerecentanalysesbylandownersoftheEUCMilleniahavedeterminedthattheEUCwillbe
gradedtopermanentlydrainbygravitytotheSaltCreekInterceptorviatheEastlakeParkway
andHunteParkwaysewermains.ThisstudydeterminedthattheExtensionwillactuallyserve
Village11andamajorportionoftheEUCMillenia.Therefore,theExtensionqualifiesasa
regionalfacilityservingseveraldevelopmentswithinthebasinandiseligibleforinclusioninthe
2015DIFupdate.TheproposedHunteParkwayExtensioncapacityenhancementconsistsof
250linearftofparallel16inchpipelinetotheexisting12inchpipelinethatconnectstotheSalt
CreekInterceptorneartheUniversitydevelopment.TheHunteParkwayExtensionisestimated
tocost$320,836(excluding5yearmaintenancefees).
3.2.3FacilitiesSummary
Table2providesasummaryofthefacilitieslocatedwithintheSaltCreekBasin.Notallfacilities
locatedwithinthebasinarerecoverablefromthedevelopmentimpactfee.Insummary,the
SaltCreekSewerBasinincludesabout87,000linearfeet(LF)orabout16.5milesofsewerlines
withatotalcostof$40.3millionforbothcurrentandfuturefacilities.Ofthefacilitieslocatedin
theSaltCreekBasin,about$28millionisrecoverablefromtheDIF.
10|Page
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 54
0 ¦¤ 55
Costs Included Costs Included
$2,921,271
1 4,517 $173,613 Pacific Bay HomesFY1998$173,613 $112,199 $267,660 $1,526,107 $390,422 $287,278 $1,295,895 $973,024 $3,222,772 $1,218,959 $1,895,193 $6,115,322 $20,399,715* $2,444,130
9,300 $4,838,512 CityFuture$4,838,512 $320,836 $7,603,478 86,925 $40,288,093 $28,003,193
Page
oel PropertiesFY2007None - regional facility
CityFY2003None - regional facilityCityFY2003None - regional facilityCityFY2008None - regional facilityCityFY2010None - regional facility
in the DIFin the DIF
|
11
costs after the 2004 DIF Study was completed.
(LF)CostConstructed byYearConstructed byYear
CompanyFY2001CompanyFY2001CityFY2003CityFY2003SDG&EFY1998SDG&EFY1998CityFY2003CityFY2003CityFY2003CityFY2003CityFY2003CityFY2003CityFutureCityFuture
To be
EastlakeEastlake
540 $144,808 Yac
$112,199 $267,660 $1,526,107 $2,921,271 $390,422 $287,278 $1,295,895 $3,222,772 $1,218,959 $1,895,193 $6,115,322 $392,916 $320,836
$973,024 14,010 $7,657,988 1,329 $3,936,373 350 $152,815 71,108 $32,684,615 6,267 $2,444,130 15,817 $7,603,478
(LF)Cost
2A 2,204 2B 2,327 4A 6,324 4B 2,608 5A 1,919 5B 3,654 8A 2,542 8B 3,952
3 2,585 6 2,924 7 8,420 9A 10,903 Hunte Parkway Extension 250
0
LengthLength
*The City incurred $267,762 due to additional project
COMPLETED FACILITIES SALT CREEK BASIN -
Auto Park Extension and Environmental Review
Auto Park Pump Station Decommissioning
Auto Park Sewer (The Crossings)
Rock Mountain Road/Main Street
Table 2: List of Facilities
Salt Creek DIF Study
FUTURE FACILITIES
City of Chula Vista
Heritage Road
Reaches
Packet
TOTAL
!¦¤£
9B'
9B
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ
LEUGIM TNUOM
B
N
5
2
-1
R
S
AL
EM
AID
A9
R_
KEE
RC
TL
AS
EM
EC LACID
D RETN
R
ENIW
YDN
ARB
B9
R_KEE
RC TLA
S
B
S
5
I-
BAY
3.3WastewaterDutyFactors
ThewastewaterflowofthevariouslandusetypesprojectedfortheSaltCreekSewerBasinis
providedinTable3.Thewastewaterflowisthecapacityinthesystemthateachnewcustomer
willutilizeafterconnecting.Thus,wastewaterflowisanappropriatemetrictoapportionthe
costsofSaltCreekfacilitiestonewcustomers.Table3comparestheupdatedwastewater
generation(duty)factorsofeachlandusetypetothedutyfactorusedinthe2004Study.
Wastewaterdutyfactorsarelowerforalllandusetypesduetowaterconservationmeasures
requiredfornewdevelopment.
Table 3: Wastewater Duty Factor Comparison
City of Chula Vista
Salt Creek DIF Study
Wastewater Duty Factor
Land Use 2004 Study2015 Study
Single Family 265 gpd230 gpd
Multi-Family 199 gpd182 gpd
Park500 gpd/acre410 gpd
CPF 2,500 gpd/acre1,313 gpd/acre
School 15 gpd/student1,181 gpd/acre
Commercial 2,500 gpd/acre1,401 gpd/acre
Industrial 2,500 gpd/acre712 gpd/acre
University20 gpd/student1,080 gpd/acre
Source: City of Chula Vista, 2004, Update to the Salt Creek
Sewer Basin Plan; IEC, 2014 Wastewater Master Plan Update
CPF- Community Public Facility; gpd - gallons per day
13|Page
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 57
3.4EDUProjections
Forthepurposeofcalculatingthedevelopmentimpactfee,projecteddevelopmentwas
convertedtoequivalentdwellingunitsbasedontheupdatedwastewaterdutyfactors
determinedbyIEC.Anequivalentdwellingunitisequaltothewastewaterflowgeneratedbya
singlefamilyresidentialcustomer,whichis230gallonsperday(gpd).Forexample,aparkis
estimatedtoproduce410gallonsperdayofwastewaterflowperacre.410gpddividedby230
gpdresultsinanEDUfactorof1.78forparkland.Thus,eachacreofparklanddevelopmentis
equalto1.78EDUs,seeTable4.
Table 4: EDU Conversion Factors
City of Chula Vista
Salt Creek DIF Study
Land Use Wastewater Duty FactorUnitsEDU Factor
Single Family 230 gpd per acre1.00
Multi-Family 182 gpd per acre0.79
Park410 gpd per acre1.78
CPF 1,313 gpd per acre5.71
School 1,181 gpd per acre5.13
Commercial sq-ft 80gpd per 1,000 sq ft0.0003
Commercial acre 1,401gpd per acre6.09
Industrial 712 gpd per acre3.10
University1,080 gpd per acre4.70
Source: IEC, 2014 Wastewater Master Plan Update
CPF- Community Public Facility; gpd - gallons per day; sq ft - square feet
Table5showsthedevelopmentprojectionbylandusetypefortheSaltCreekBasinthrough
buildout.Table5isbasedonthewastewaterdutyfactorsestimatedinthe2014Wastewater
MasterPlanandthedevelopmentacreagesandresidentialunitsprovidedbytheCity.
AppendixAprovidestheestimatedremainingwastewaterflowofeachdevelopmentarea.In
total,theremainingEDUsintheSaltCreekBasinareestimatedtoproduceawastewaterflow
of4.75milliongallonsperday.
Intotal,anestimated20,668EDUsareremainingintheSaltCreekBasintobedeveloped
throughbuildout.Asshown,morethanhalfoftheremainingdevelopmentisprojectedtobe
multifamilyunits.Table6comparestheEDUcountcalculatedinthe2004SaltCreekDIFStudy
totheEDUcountcalculatedinthis2015update.Acrossthebasin,thisstudyprojectsacountof
20,668EDUsremaining,achangefromthe25,668EDUsprojectedin2004.Someareasofthe
basinhavebeendevelopedsince2004whichreducedtheremainingEDUs.
14|Page
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 58
0 ¦¤ 59
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 53 0 53 Eastlake Woods/Trails 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 15 0 15 000 0.00 0.0 0.0 0 230
187 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 621 1,429 2,101 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,850,000 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 643 0 0.0 0.0 695 1,045 1,607 0.0
0.0 32.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 89 238 15.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 427 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 128 0 128 5.1 1.4 9.5 0 0.0
36.5 0.0 517 659 1,217 3 39.9 0.0 1,002 595 1,753 62.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 453 0 565 0.0 6.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
81 0 117 0 0.0 0 2,993 3,219
0.0 0.0 0.0 943 2,617 3,113 0.0 0.0 0.0 266 3,734 3,922 0.0 0.0 290.0 0 0 1,362
20,668 EDUs
TOTAL
EDUS
REMAINING
Page
nology Park.
d/EDU
|
15
Plan
2014 Wastewater Collection System Master
ive of permanently diverting into Poggi Basin 529 EDUs at 215 gp
0.25 and 0.75 for the 85 acre (3,700,000 sq ft) Regional Tech
Multi-
Residential Units
units
Family13,391
units
SingleFamily4,774
acres
acreIndustrial University
290.0
acres
76.4
23.2 10.7 6.0 3,487,000 0.0 0.
50 that would generate about 1,850,000 sq ft.
are located within the Poggi Canyon Basin
Source: development projections - City of Chula Vista; wastewater duty factors - IEC,
EDU - equivalent dwelling units, one EDU = 230 gallons per day wastewater flow
Nonresidential Acreage
EUC Tech Sewer Study PBS&J, 1/2008).
Comm
acres
26.3
7.6 4.3 9.2 0.0 0.7.9 4.2 8.3 20,000 11.
Comm 7.3 4.2 10.8 20,000 27.5 5.0 19.8 1,500,000 188.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7,192,000
sq-ft
sq-ft
0.0
The adopted General Plan has a (floor area ratio) FAR of between
27.9 5.8 31.6 300,00
** Net Reduction of 495 EDUs is based on the preferred alternat
0.0 0.0 0.0 15,
Table 5: Salt Creek Basin Remaining Acreage and Units
Park CPFSchool
acres
0.0127.8
acres
0.041.9
Portions of Village 2, Village 7 and EUC
Based on a City’s FAR assumption of 0.
University 0.0
converted to 230 gpd/EDU basis (per
acres
357.3
* Proposed General Plan Land Use
+
++
Regional Technology Park
**
Planning Area 12 (EUC)
Salt Creek DIF Study
City of Chula Vista
Development Area
Planning Area 20
Birch Foundation
Eastlake Vistas
Village 8 West
Village 8 East*
++
Village 10*
Bella Lago
Village 3*
Village 11
Village 2* ++
Packet
Village 9Village 4Village 7
!¦¤£
Total
++
+
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ
Village 9
Village 4
Table 6: Change in EDUs
City of Chula Vista
Salt Creek DIF Study
Equivalent Dwelling Units
Development Area 2004 Study2015 Study Difference
Village 8 (East and West) 1,663 5,214 3,551
University not included1,3621,362
Village 2 466 1,217 751
Planning Area 20 not included427 427
Village 93,526 3,922 396
Regional Technology Park not included643 643
Birch Foundation not included128 128
Planning Area 12 (EUC) 3,111 3,219 108
Eastlake Greens 8 build-out** (8)
Bella Lago 14053 (87)
Village 4705565 (140)
Eastlake Woods/Trails 16015 (145)
Village 16* 411 not included (411)
Misc. 596 notincluded (596)
Village 32,427 1,753 (674)
Rolling Hills Ranch 723 build-out** (723)
Eastlake Vistas-Lake Pointe & Olympic Pointe 1,109 187 (922)
Village 10 2,540 1,607 (933)
Village 71,635117 (1,518)
Village 11 1,986238 (1,748)
Village 14* 1,838 not included (1,838)
Village 13* 2,624not included (2,624)
Total 25,668 20,668(5,000)
*Not included; County service areas.
**Development area is at build-out. No future development will occur.
3.4.1CountyProperties
The2015StudydoesnotincludetheareasintheCountyknownasVillage13,14,and16.
Althoughthesepropertieswereincludedinthe2004DIF,itisassumedthatoncetheCounty
developmenthasbeendefinedandauthorized,andsubsequenttothenecessarytechnical
sewerstudiesbytheCounty,theDIFwillbeupdatedbytheCity.TheapprovedCountyGeneral
Planindicatestheseareasrepresent4,500EDUs.
3.4.2DivertedEDUs
AsmallerportionofPlanningArea12(theEasternUrbanCenterΑEUCMillenia)islocatedin
thePoggiCanyonBasin.The2008PB&JEUCSewerTechStudyidentified189EDUslocated
withinthePoggiCanyonBasin.ThemostcurrentgradingproposalfortheEUCindicatesan
increaseinflowspermanentlydivertedfromtheSaltCreekBasintothePoggiCanyonBasin.A
totalestimatedflowequalto495EDUswillbepermanentlydivertedtothePoggiCanyonBasin.
Thisdiversionispermanentinnatureandnoadditionalimpactsaspreviouslyidentifiedinthe
2009PoggiDIFUpdateareanticipated.
17|Page
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 61
SECTION4:2050BuildoutCapacityAnalysis
IECcompletedaWastewaterMasterPlanUpdate(WWMP)fortheCityinMay2014which
evaluatedthesystemcapacitythrough2050anddevelopedacapitalimprovementprogram
(CIP)forrehabilitationandexpansiontoaccommodatesystemdiscrepancies.Ahydraulicmodel
wasdevelopedinsupportoftheevaluation.IECmodifiedthehydraulicmodelwithupdated
landuseprojectionsofmajordevelopmentsinplanningyear2050,whichwasprovidedbythe
City,toreevaluatetheSaltCreekTrunkSeweranddevelopedadditionalCIPprojectswithcost
estimates.
ThepurposeofthissectionistoanalyzethehydrauliccapacityoftheSaltCreekInterceptorand
recommendedpipelinesizesofthetwotrunksewersitserves,whichincludestheHeritage
RoadTrunkSewerandtheRockMountainRoad/MainStreetTrunkSewer.FourCIPprojects
proposedin2014WWMP,whichareP29,P30,P42,andP43,andtheHunteParkwayExtension
Projectwerealsoanalyzedfortheirhydrauliccapacityastheywereaffectedbytheproposed
developmentsflowsandconnectedtotheSaltCreekInterceptor.TheHunteParkwayExtension
improvementplanshavebeenapprovedbytheCity.BoththeHunteParkwayExtension
improvementprojectandP30from2014WWMPproposeimprovementforthesamepipeline
segment,butwithdifferentmethods.TheHunteParkwayExtensionimprovementproject
proposestoinstallanewpipelineparalleltothepipelinesegment,andP30proposestoupsize
thepipelinesegment.
TheSaltCreekTrunkSeweriscurrentlydividedintoninereaches,approximatelynorthfrom
StoneGateStreettoeastofI805Freeway.SincetheSaltCreekDIFwasestablishedin1994,
theDIFcontinuedtoberevisedandupdatedforgrowthanddevelopmentswithintheSalt
CreekSewerBasinanditsadjacentbasins,suchasPoggiCanyonBasinandWolfCanyonBasin.
Populationgrowthanddevelopmentsproposedwithinthesebasinsmayincreasewastewater
deliveredtotheSaltCreekTrunkSewerandrequirerehabilitationandadditionalfacilitiesto
supporttheadditionaldevelopment.ThisstudyaddedtheHeritageRoadTrunkSewerandRock
MountainRoad/MainStreetTrunkSewerforevaluationunder2050PWWFconditions.These
twotrunksewersareproposedtobeservedbytheSaltCreekInterceptor.Inordertohave
sufficientfundfortheconstructionoftheSaltCreekInterceptor,ahydrauliccapacityanalysisis
neededtoidentifydeficientpipelines,developadditionalcapitalimprovements,ifnecessary,to
eliminatesystemdeficienciesandincreasetheƭǤƭƷĻƒƭhydraulicperformance,andupdatethe
costsassociatedwiththeadditionalcapitalimprovements.
18|Page
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 62
4.1FlowProjection
TheSaltCreekTrunkSewermainlyservestheSaltCreekBasin,WolfCanyonBasin,Poggi
CanyonBasin,andMainStreetBasin,therefore,populationgrowthanddevelopments
withintheseareaswouldhavepotentialimpactontheSaltCreekTrunkSewer.Inthe2014
WWMPstudy,IEChasdevelopedwastewaterflowprojectionsfortheCitythrough2050.
InformationonmajordevelopmentsisprovidedbytheCitywithlandusetypesandarea
underparcellevel.Flowsassociatedwiththeseproposeddevelopmentswereprojected
basedontheGeneralPlanDwellingUnits(DU)peracre.TheCityprovidedIECupdateson
landuseprojectionswithtargetedbuildoutinformationofthedevelopmentprojectsand
addedfewmoredevelopmentprojectswithinthestudyareabyplanningyear2050into
consideration.Flowprojectionsforeachdevelopmentprojectin2050isupdatedby
calculatingthemaximumbuildoutofeachlandusetypeforeachproposeddevelopment.
Table7liststhe2050wastewaterflowprojectionsforproposednewdevelopmentstothe
SaltCreekSewerInterceptor.Detailedlandusebuildoutinformationwithcorresponding
tributarymanholesalongtheSaltCreekInterceptorcanbeseeninAppendixBand
AppendixC,respectively.
19|Page
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 63
Table 72050 Salt Creek Interceptor Wastewater Flow Projections
:
City of Chula Vista
Salt Creek DIF Study
Wastewater Flow
Proposed Development Project (gpd)
Bella Lago 32,200
Eastlake Trails 244,951
Eastlake Woods and West Development 193,772
Eastlake Greens & Landswap Development 1 (Salt Creek Basin) 232,300
Eastlake Greens & Landswap Development 1 (Poggi Basin) 460,308
Eastlake Vistas-Lake Pointe & Olympic Pointe 119,140
Eastlake Vistas 387,646
Olympic Training Center 153,057 *
Village 2 (Salt Creek Basin) 279,985
Village 2 (Poggi Basin)** 757,928
Village 3 403,146
Village 4 130,020
Village 7 (Salt Creek Basin) 212,170
Village 7 (Poggi Basin)** 198,303
Village 8 West 483,323
Village 8 East 716,046
Village 9 901,992
Regional Technology Park 148,000
University 313,200
Village 10 369,667
Village 11 554,806
Plng. Area 12 (EUC) (Salt Creek Basin) 740,483
Plng. Area 12 (EUC) (Poggi Basin)** 113,932
Plng. Area 12 -(Freeway Commercial) (Poggi Basin)** 149,524
Plng. Area 20 98,095
Birch Foundation 29,440
Rolling Hills Ranch 303,692
High Tech High 93,012
Total 8,820,138
*Flow adopted from Table 3-1 of the 2014 WWMP. Assumed 100% Return-To-Sewer Ratio
to account for future buildout.
**Wastewater flows projected from the Poggi Basin are for hydraulic analysis purposes only.
Thetotalsewerflowsprojectedforthelistedproposeddevelopmentsin2014WWMPwas
approximately8.34mgdbyplanningyear2050,andthenewsewerflowsprojectedinthis
studyare8.82mgdwithanincrementalflowincreaseof0.48mgd.TheSaltCreek
InterceptorisassumedtocollectflowsfromSaltCreekBasin,MainStreetBasin,andWolf
CanyonBasinonly.TheHeritageRoadTrunkSewerisproposedtoservetheVillage2anda
largeportionofVillage3developmentareaswhileRockMountainRoad/MainStreetTrunk
SewerisproposedtoserveasmallportionofVillage3,Village4,andVillage7development
areas.
20|Page
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 64
4.2HydraulicModelDevelopment
Aspartofthe/źƷǤƭWastewaterMasterPlanpreformedinJuly2014,IECdevelopedan
InfoSWMMsewersystemhydraulicmodelfromthesewersystemGISdatabase.Thisplatform
combinesafullydynamichydraulicmodelingenginedevelopedandapprovedbythe
EnvironmentalProtectionAgency(EPA)withtheGISinterfacethatcantakeadvantageofthe
datathattheCityhasbuiltintoitssewersystemGISdatabase.Thismodelwasusedandrevised
forthehydrauliccapacityanalysisinthisstudy.
4.2.1ModelRevision
Threeflowconditionswereanalyzedinthisstudy,whichwereAverageDryWeatherFlow
(ADWF),PeakDryWeatherFlow(PDWF),andPeakWetWeatherFlow(PWWF)conditions.The
baseflows(ADWF)developedfor2050in2014WWMPhavebeenupdatedwiththenewflow
projectionsinthisstudytoaccountfortheincrementalflowincrease,pertheupdated
developmentinformationprovidedbytheCity.
Themodelnetworkhasbeenreviewedforconsistencywiththe/źƷǤƭasbuiltplans.Several
inconsistenciesinpipesizes,connections,andslopeswerediscoveredandcorrectedbased
uponverificationofasbuiltplans.
TherearedualpipelinesalongSaltCreekInterceptorbetweenOlympicParkwayandthe
connectionswiththeOlympicTrainingCenterlaterals,asshowninFigureA12andFigureA1
3inAppendixC.WithverificationfromtheCity,oneoftheparallelpipelinesisusedasan
overflowfacility.Therefore,themodelwasrunwithsinglepipelinetobeconservativefor
analysis.
TheHunteParkwayExtensionisaSaltCreeksewerlateralimprovementprojectthatproposed
aparallel16inchpipelinetotheexisting12inchpipelinethatconnectstoSaltCreek
InterceptorneartheUniversityDevelopmentProjectsite.Itsplanshavebeenapprovedbythe
CityandcanbeseeninAppendixD.Thesame12inchpipelinehasbeenrecommendedfor
upsizingto18inchesindiameterinthe2014WWMP,asshowninFigure3.PertheCity
request,IEChasmodeledtheHunteParkwayextensionasaCIPalternativeforevaluation.
The2014WWMPdoesnotincludeanalysisfortheHeritageRoadTrunkSewerandRock
MountainRoad/MainStreetTrunkSewer,buttheHeritageRoadTrunkSewerisunder
constructionconcurrentlywiththeconstructionoftheHeritageRoadstreetimprovementsat
thistimeandrecentanalysesbythevariouslandownersandtheCityhasshownthattheRock
MountainRoad/MainStreettrunksewerwouldbeneededtoservetheVillage4andVillage7
Developments.Therefore,thesetwotrunksewerswereaddedtothemodelforanalysisinthis
21|Page
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 65
study.TheHeritageRoadTrunkSewerlocateswithinthevicinityofVillage2andVillage3
developments,andisproposedtoservethesetwodevelopmentsites.Accordingtocurrent
studiesforVillage7development,sewerflowsfromVillage7developmentwillbediverted
throughVillage8WesttemporarilysouthtotheSaltCreekInterceptor,andcurrentstudiesfor
Village4developmentindicatedthatitwouldbeunlikelysewerflowsfromVillage4conveyed
westerlythroughVillage8WestdevelopmentandthensouthtotheSaltCreekInterceptor.A
permanentsolutionservingbothVillage4andVillage7developmentsisanticipatedwiththe
constructionoftheRockMountainRoad/MainStreettrunksewerinMainStreet.
Thetwotrunksewerswerealignedtomatchtheproposedroadcirculationalignmentwith
minimumsloperequirementtobeconservativeforanalysis.TheCityhasaminimumof0.4%
sloperequirementforsewerconstruction.
ThepipelinesevaluatedinthisstudyincludetheSaltCreekInterceptor,theHeritageRoad
TrunkSewer,theRockMountainRoad/MainStreetTrunkSewer,fouraffectedCIPprojects
proposedin2014WWMP,andtheHunteParkwayExtension.DetailsofSaltCreekInterceptor
areshownfromFigureA11toFigureA113inAppendixC,anddetailsofthetwotrunk
sewersareshowninFigureA2inAppendixE.ThefourCIPprojectsevaluatedinthisstudyare
showninFigureA31andFigureA32inAppendixF.
22|Page
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 66
¡À
A
2!
!
2!
!
2!
!
Legend
2!
Studied Manhole
!
Salt Creek Interceptor
Recommended CIP Pipeline Improvement Projects
P30
P42
Existing Wastewater Collection Pipelines
Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS,
City of Chula Vista Roads
USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS
User Community
B
22!!
!!
2!
!
2!
!
22!!
!!
2!
!
Legend
2!
Studied Manhole
!
Salt Creek Interceptor
City of Chula Vista
Recommended CIP Pipeline Improvement Projects
Salt Creek DIF Study
P42
CIP Project P-30/
Hunte Parkway Extension Hunte Parkway Extension
Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS,
Existing Wastewater Collection Pipelines
May 2015
USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS
City of Chula Vista Roads
Figure 3
User Community
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 67
4.2.2PeakDryWeatherFlow((PDWF)
PDWFwaasdevelopedbypeakinggtheaveraggedryweathherflow(ADWF)withdiuurnalcurvessto
accountfforthevariaationinseweergenerationthatoccurrsovertheccourseofatyypicalday.
Residentialandnonresidentialfflowshaveddifferentusagepatterns,,sotwodiurrnalcurveswwere
extracteddfromflowmonitoringdatacollecteedfromtheCity.Thenoormalizeddiurnalcurvessfor
residentialandnonrresidentialsewerflowsccanbeenseeeninFigure4andFigure5.Base
infiltratioon(BI)wasnnotincludedinPDWFasitisusuallysmallunderrdryweatheerconditionssand
duetolackofinformmation.
Figure 4:Normalized Diurnal Curvves
RResidential
24|Paage
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 68
Nonn-Residentiall
4.2.3PeakWetWeeatherFlow(PWWF)
ThePWWWFwascalcuulatedPDWFFplusrainfalldependenntinfiltrationn/inflow(RDDI/I)andBI,
combinedasInflow/Infiltration((I/I)basedonnthebestdataavailablee.RDI/Iisstoormwatertthat
entersthhewastewattercollectionnsysteminddirectresponsetotheinntensityanddurationoff
individuaalrainfalleveents,RDI/Immayrecedeggraduallyaftterastorm,however,annyresidualfflow
isconsideeredtobeageneralincreaseinGWWI.
Peakvaluueswereevaaluatedbaseedonconsisstencythroughouttheyeearfromdattagatheredfrom
the/źƷǤssmainoutfaalls,removinganyinconssistentpeakks,resultingiinanaveraggepeakingfaactor
forI/Iof1.85.SincetthemaximumpeakingfaactorfortottalPDWFisaapproximateely1.45timees
ADWF,thhetotalI/Iissapproximattely40%ofAADWF.ThettotalvolumeeofI/Iwasaaveragedouut
acrossthhecityandmmultipliedaccordinglytoeachpipelinnebasedonnitslengthddiameter.Thhen
RespectivveI/IvaluewwasthenaddedtothebbaseflowpeertimeperioodforPWWFF.
4.3HHydraulicAAnalysis
ThehydrraulicmodelistheprimaarytooltoannalyzethehhydrauliccappacityoftheSaltCreek
IntercepttorandtheTTrunkSewerrlinesthatittserves.Identificationoofhydraulicddeficient
pipelinessanddeveloopmentofcaapitalimprovvementprojjects(CIPs)aarebasedonnthe/źƷǤƭ
designcrriteria.
25|Paage
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 69
4.3.1DesignCriteria
Thefollowingdesigncriteria,asdescribedinthe2014WWMP,areusedinthisanalysis:
Forexistingpipelines,
Pipes12inchesindiameterandsmaller:70%fullatpeakwetweatherflow
Pipesover12inchesindiameter:85%fullatpeakwetweatherflow
ağƓƓźƓŭƭn:0.013
Forproposednewpipelines,
Pipes12inchesindiameterandsmaller:50%fullatpeakwetweatherflow
Pipesover12inchesindiameter:75%fullatpeakwetweatherflow
ağƓƓźƓŭƭn:0.013
4.3.2ModelResults
Thenewflowsprojectedbasedontheupdatedlanduseinformationaddanadditionalflowof
approximately0.48mgdtotheSaltCreekInterceptor.TableT2inAppendixGshowsthemodel
resultsfor2050systemwithexistingconditionsunderthethreeflowconditions.TableT3in
AppendixHshowsthemodelresultsfor2050systemwithCIPprojectsproposedin2014
WWMPandHunteParkwayExtensionpipelineimprovementprojectunderthethreeflow
conditions.CIPprojectP30proposedin2014WWMPandtheHunteParkwayExtensionproject
thatwasapprovedbytheCityaretwoalternativestoeliminatethehydraulicdeficiencyinPipe
17093.Modelresultsshowedthatbothalternativesareeffectiveineliminatingthehydraulic
deficiency.
PipeIDwithprefixͻL9/DaͼarenewpipelinesforeitherHeritageRoadTrunkSewer,Rock
MountainRoad/MainStreetTrunkSewer,ortheparallelpipelinesofHunteParkwayextension.
4.4CapitalImprovementProgramandCostEstimates
SincetheexistinglinesandtheaffectedCIPprojectsproposedin2014WWMPareabletomeet
thedesigncriteriawiththenew2050flows,noadditionalpipelineimprovementsareneeded
ontheexistingsystem.Basedonmodelresults,threeCIPprojectsareidentified,which
includedtheHeritageRoadTrunkSewerandtheRockMountainRoad/MainStreetTrunk
Sewer,toserveVillage2,Village3,Village4,andVillage7(SeeFigureA2inAppendixE),and
theHunteParkwayExtensionproject(SeeFigure2).
TheHeritageRoadTrunkSewerisalignedalongHeritageRoadfromSantaVictoriaRoadto
MainStreetwithapproximately6,300ft.Itisrecommendedforsizingof15inchesindiameter.
TheRockMountainRoad/MainStreetTrunkSewerisalignedalongRockMountainRoad/Main
StreetfromMagdalenaAvenuetoHeritageRoadwithapproximately9,300ft.Itssewerlines
26|Page
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 70
betweenMagdalenaAvenueandLaMediaRoadarerecommendedforsizingof12inchesin
diameter,anditssewerlinesbetweenLaMediaRoadandHeritageRoadarerecommendedfor
sizingof15inchesindiameter.TheHunteParkwayExtensionischosenoverCIPprojectP30as
analternativeforPipe17093asithasbeenapprovedbytheCity.
4.4.1CostEstimates
CapitalimprovementcostsoftheHeritageRoadTrunkSewer,RockMountainRoad/MainStreet
TrunkSewer,andtheHunteParkwayExtensionprojectwereestimatedinthissection.Capital
improvementcostsofbothtrunksewerswereestimatedbasedontheunitcostsdeveloped
fromthepreviousprojectsdonebyIECinasimilarmanner.TheunitcostfortheRockMountain
Road/MainStreetTrunkSewerwereadjustedduetouncertaintieswiththeconstruction
phasingofthesewerandroadimprovementsassociatedwithMainStreetbetweenVillage8
WestdevelopmentandHeritageRoad.ThecapitalimprovementcostsoftheHunteParkway
Extensionprojectwereadoptedfromthe/źƷǤƭBondEstimatefortheHunteParkwayExtension
project,asshowninAppendixJ.
Theseestimatesarebasedonthebestavailabledataatthetimeofthisstudy;however,since
pricesofmaterialsandlaborfluctuatewithtime,newestimatesshouldbeobtainedduringpre
designforproposedfacilitiestoconfirmbudgetamounts.TheENRCCILAis10760for
November2014.Costsestimatedhereinforrecommendedfacilitiesshouldbeadjustedinthe
futureeitherbymakingnewestimatesorbycomparingthefutureENRCCILAindexto10760.
TheunitcostsusedinthisstudyweredevelopedbaseduponthepreviousprojectsdonebyIEC
inasimilarnature.Engineering,administrationservicesandcontingencieswereincludedasa
percentageoftotalconstructioncostsforpipelineimprovements.Afactorof20%of
constructioncosthasbeenusedforengineeringandadministrationassoftcosts,which
includesbutisnotlimitedtothefollowing:
Planninganddesignreports
Design
CEQAcompliance
Permits
Surveying
Serviceduringconstruction(submittals,asbuilts)
Inspection
27|Page
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 71
Pipematerials,pavementsawcutting,removal,andreplacement,trafficcontrol,installationof
miscellaneousappurtenances,excavation,beddingandbackfillweretakenintoconsiderationin
developingunitcostsforwastewaterpipelineconstruction.Afactorof30%ofconstructioncost
andsoftcosthasbeenusedforcontingencycost.Table8presentsthepipelineunitcost.
Table 8: Pipeline Unit Costs
City of Chula Vista
Salt Creek DIF Study
PipelineConstruction Contingency Total Unit
Diameter (in.) Material Cost ($) Soft Cost ($) ($) Cost ($)
8 VCP 170 34 61 265
12 VCP 200 40 72 312
15 VCP 250 50 90 390
Note: Unit costs include construction cost, soft cost, and contingency cost.
Table9presentsthecostestimatesforeachprojectbasedupontheunitcosts,proposed
location,proposeddiameter,andestimatedlengthofeachproject.ThetotalcostoftheWolf
CanyonTrunkSewerisestimatedtobeapproximately$7.6million.
28|Page
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 72
0 ¦¤ 73
Page
++
om 8” to 12” pipe construction
48,786 **
4,789,726 +
Total 15,817$7,603,478
320,836
15 6,267$2,444,130
ance
|
Project No. Description Location Size (in.) Length (LF) Capital Cost ($)
29
provement Project.5-year mainten
Capital costs for SCP-2 were calculated based on unit construction costs 66% higher than Table 8 due to uncertainties with the
** Estimate based on the incremental cost from 8” to 12” pipe sizes. Village 8 West pipeline segments will require to upsize fr
1,0388,262
16 250
recover capital costs and DIF administrative costs.
* Heritage Road Trunk Sewer is under construction at this time. Proposed alignment provided by the City.
Street between Village 8 West and Heritage Road.
12 15
the Salt Creek Sewer Lateral Im
Heritage Road From Santa Victoria Road
Main Street from La Media Road
between Magdalena Avenue and La
Rock Mountain Road/ Main Street
Table 9: Future Capital Improvement Projects with Cost Estimate
(Appendix D) Please see Figure 3
++ Capital costs were adopted from the City's Bond Estimate for
to Heritage Road
to Main Street
Media Road
expenses excluded. Development impact fees may only
sizes due to additional flows from offsite developments.
phasing of the sewer and road improvements in Main
City Approved Plans++
Rock Mountain Road/
Heritage Road Trunk
Main Street Trunk
Sewer*
Sewer
Salt Creek DIF Study
City of Chula Vista
Hunte Parkway
Extension
Packet
!¦¤£
SCP-1
SCP-2
+
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ
TheHeritageTrunkSewerwasproposedtobe3,100LFof10inchpipelinesand1,500LFof
12inchpipelinesinthe2004SaltCreekDIFstudy,andisproposedtobe63,00LFof15inch
pipelinesinthisstudy.TheRockMountainRoad/MainStreetTrunkSewer,whichwas
proposedtobe7,400LFof15inchpipelinesinthe2004SaltCreekDIF,isnowproposedto
extendanother1,900LFinthisstudy.Withinthese1,900LFofpipelines,about1,000LFof
pipelineswereproposedsizingof8inchesindiameterinthe/źƷǤƭpreviousindividual
projectimpactstudy,butarerequiredtobeupsizedto12inchesindiameterinthisstudy.
Thedifferentialcostsofthesepipelinesfromsizeof8inchindiameterto12inchin
diameterareincludedinthecostestimates.ThealignmentoftheRockMountain
Road/MainStreettrunksewerisstillbeingdeveloped.ItisuncertainwhethertheRock
MountainRoad/MainStreetsewerimprovementswouldbeconstructedconcurrentwith
thestreetimprovements.Constructioncostsofsewerimprovementsthatdonotfollowa
roadconfigurationmaytendtobecomesignificanthigherthanatypicalcombinedsewer
andstreetimprovements.AccordingtothecostestimatefortheWolfCanyonsewer
facilitiesdevelopedinthe2004SaltCreekDIFstudy(SeeAppendixJ),therewere
contracteddesignandprojectmanagementservicesfortheRockMountainRoad/Main
StreetTrunkSewerwithhigherconstructioninspectionandadministrationcostsprojected
ascomparedtothecapitalimprovementcostsoftheHeritageRoadTrunkSewer.Basedon
thereviewoftheWolfCanyontopography,constructionphasingoftheMainStreet
improvementsbetweenVillage8WestandHeritageRoadandCitydiscussionswith
propertyownersofVillage4,7,and8Westproperties,thecapitalcostsoftheRock
MountainRoad/MainStreettrunksewerwereescalatedwithhigherunitcosts,whichis
approximately66%higherthantheunitcostsshowninTable8.ThetotalcostoftheCIP
projectsisestimatedtobeapproximately$7.6million.
30|Page
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 74
SECTION5:DIFAnalysis
5.1CurrentDIFProgram
The2004UpdatetotheSaltCreekSewerBasinPlandescribedprojectcostsandprogramcosts
thatwereeligibleforDIFfunding.Thestudyincludedover13.5milesofsewerpipelinetoserve
developmentintheSaltCreekBasinandWolfCanyonBasin.TheSaltCreekBasinisnow
envisionedtoincludeabout16.5milesofpipeline.The2015Studyremovesdevelopercredits
thathavesincebeenexpended,updatesfinancingcosts,addstheenvironmentalmitigation
cost,addsDIFprogramadministrativecosts,andrevisestheSaltCreekBasinreservefund
balance.
5.2FeeMethodology
Althoughnotstatedexplicitly,the1994WilsonStudyusedacapacityexpansionfee
methodologytocalculatetheDIFwhichwascarriedforwardtothe2004Studyandisusedin
thisupdate.The/źƷǤƭDIFstudiesdefineanareaofservice(i.e.thesewerbasin)andthe
facilitiesneededtoservegrowthinthatservicearea.TheSaltCreekfacilitiesdonotprovidea
generalbenefittoconnectionsinotherbasins;instead,theSaltCreekfacilitiesserveonlynew
growthoccurringintheSaltCreekbasin.
Whennewcustomersconnecttothewastewatersystem,theyuseeitherreservecapacity
availableinexistingfacilities,ortheyrequirenewcapacitythatmustbeaddedtothesystemto
accommodatetheirneeds.Underthismethod,eachnewcustomerwouldpayforthemarginal
costofhisuseofthereservecapacityandfornewfacilitiesnecessarytoprovideserviceto
them.Thegoalofthismethodistominimizeoreliminatetheneedtoraiseratesinorderto
provideforsystemexpansion.
Consequently,newcustomerspayfullyfortheadditionalfacilitieswithoutimposingaburden
onexistingcustomers.Sinceitislikelythatthetimingofpaymentsreceivedfromthecapacity
feeswillnotexactlymatchthetimingofexpenditurestoprovidefacilities,thefeeshouldbe
adjustedtoreflectthetimevalueofmoney.Theintentisthatthechargebeequaltothe
requiredinvestmentasiftheconstructionweretooccuratthetimeofcontribution.The2015
feecalculationincludesfinancingcostswhichreflectthecarryingcostofCity(i.e.theCity
financedcapitalfacilitiesupfrontandismakingdebtservicepaymentswhichwillbenefitnew
customerswhoconnectinthefuture).
31|Page
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 75
5.3ProjectCosts
Table10showstheSaltCreekDIFobligatedfacilitiescostsincludingthecostoftheReaches
constructedbytheCityandtheReachesconstructedbyothers.Table10alsoestimatesa
constructioncostforfuturefacilitiesneededtoservegrowthconsistingoftheRockMountain
Road/MainStreet,HeritageRoad,andthe2014WWMPprojects.The2014WWMPlinesare
newprojectsthatwasnotenvisionedinthe2004study.Intotal,$28millioninprojectcosts
areincludedinthe2015DIF.
Table 10: Project Costs
City of Chula Vista
Salt Creek DIF Study
Line Project Cost
Constructed by City
Reach 1 $173,613
Reach 2A 112,199
Reach 2B 267,660
Reach 3 1,526,107
Reach 4A 2,921,271
Reach 5B 1,295,895
Reach 6 973,024
Reach 7 3,222,772
Reach 8A 1,218,959
Reach 8B 1,895,193
Reach 9A 6,115,322
Subtotal $19,722,015*
Constructed by Others
Reach 4B and 5A $677,700
Future Construction Cost
Heritage Road Trunk Sewer (Wolf Canyon)** 2,444,130
Rock Mountain Road/Main Street Trunk Sewer (Wolf Canyon)** 4,838,512
Hunte Parkway Extension 320,836
Subtotal $7,603,478
Total Project Costs $28,003,193
*The City incurred $267,762 due to additional project costs after the 2004 DIF was
completed.
**The alignment of Rock Mountain Road/Main Street is still being developed and
Heritage Road is under construction at this time.
5.4DeveloperCredits
Reaches1,2A,and2Bwereconstructedbydeveloperswhowereowed$553,000increditfor
thosefacilities.Since2004,alloutstandingdevelopercreditshavebeenexpendedandno
developercreditsareincludedinthe2015DIFcalculation.Instead,thecostofReaches1,2A,
and2Barenotedasfacilitycostsforthe2015study.
32|Page
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 76
FutureWolfCanyonTrunkSewerlinesareassumedtobeconstructedbytheCity.However,
basedontheprovisionsofSections15and16ofOrdinanceNo.2617,adeveloperwhoagrees
orisrequiredtoconstructfacilitiesbenefittingthebasinwouldbeentitledtoreceivea
reimbursementorcreditatthe/źƷǤƭoption.IftheCityissuesdevelopercreditsinthefuture,
theCityshouldrevisetheDIFtoincludethevalueofthedevelopercredits.
5.5ConstructionFunding
TheSaltCreekBasinfacilitieshavebeenconstructedthroughtheyearsusingfunding
throughtheSaltCreekBasinDIFfundand,whereDIFfundswerenotavailable,through
loansfromtheTrunkSewerCapitalReserveFund.LoansmadefromtheTrunkSewer
CapitalReserveFundmustberepaidusingDIFfunds.Table11summarizesthehistoryof
loansfromtheTrunkSewerCapitalReserveFundtotheSaltCreekDIFfund.Theloanswill
berepaidoveratermof20years.Todate,financingcoststotalabout$5.9million.For
paymentsmadeintothefuture,theCityestimatesapproximately$505,000inadditional
financingcosts.Subtractedfromthetotalfinancingcostisabout$2.5millionindebtservice
thathasalreadybeenpaidwithDIFscollectedfrompastconnections.Intotal,theSalt
CreekDIFisobligatedtopay$24.6millionindebtservicecosts.
Table 11: Financing Cost
City of Chula Vista
Salt Creek DIF Study
LoanOriginalAmount Now Financing Cost
Loan Name Facilities DatePrincipalDue through FY2014
SW210 Reaches 4B & 5A 07/01/97$674,180 1,108,018 $433,838
SW219 Reaches 3, 4A, 5B, 6, 7, 8 12/29/007,585,500 7,661,810 2,576,393
SW219 Reaches 3, 4A, 5B, 6, 7, 8 12/04/011,300,000 1,676,937 376,937
SW219 Reaches 3, 4A, 5B, 6, 7, 9 08/13/022,524,596 3,182,833 658,237
SW225 Wolf Canyon Trunk 06/30/041,000,000 1,218,734 218,734
SW219 Reach 9A 08/17/046,115,322 7,436,646 1,321,324
SW219 Reach 7A 08/17/041,467,879 1,785,040 317,161
Total Loans $20,667,477 $24,070,018 $5,902,624
Future Financing Cost $505,411
Total Financing Cost $6,408,035
Original Principal $20,667,477
Total Loan Repayment $27,075,512
Payments to Date ($2,500,083)
Outstanding Loan Payments $24,575,429
Source: City staff
*The construction cost of facilities was $20.4 million as shown in Table 2. In addition, the City incurred
$267,762 due to additional project costs after the 2004 DIF Study was completed.
Note: The City will maintain a loan repayment reserve of $1.3 million.
33|Page
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 77
5.6EnvironmentalMitigation
Followingthe/źƷǤƭSection10(a)permitundertheFederalEndangeredSpeciesAct,a
contributionof$1,000,000mustbemadetothePreserveManagementEndowmentFund
(PMEF)asarequirementfortheSaltCreekGravitySewerInterceptorproject.TheSaltCreek
TrunkSewerisaplannedfacilitythroughthepreserveandthefundswillbeusedforpreserve
restorationandmaintenance.Toseeacompleteaccountoftheenvironmentalconcernsand
recommendationsmadebytheenvironmentalcommunityandthefullexplanationsonhow
theywereaddressedbytheCity,refertotheͻ FinalProgramEnvironmentalImpactReportΑ
SaltCreekInterceptorSewerandWolfCanyonTrunkSewer ͼͲpreparedbyDudek&Associates
2
datedJune2001.
5.7DIFAdministration
BWAestimatestheSaltCreekDIFadministrativecosttobe$120,000throughbuildout.State
lawrequiresthatdevelopmentimpactfeesandcapacityfeesbeheldinarestrictedfundand
usedonlytoimprovefacilitiesneededtoservegrowth.TheadministrativeportionoftheDIF
willbeusedtocoverthecostsofaccountingfortherestrictedDIFfund.
5.8AvailableReserves
AsofJune30,2014,theSaltCreekDIFfundbalanceis$5,805,114.Thebalanceismadeupof
developmentimpactfeespaidinthepastbycustomersconnectingtothesystemandinterest
earnedonthepastfees.TheDIFfundbalancethereforerepresentstheportionoffacilitycosts
thathavealreadybeenpaidforbypastcustomersproportionaltotheircapacityinthesystem.
Afterthefundbalanceisapplied,theoutstandingcostistheportionoffacilitiescosts
attributabletothe.ğƭźƓƭremainingEDUs.
5.9DevelopmentImpactFeeCalculation
Table12calculatestheSaltCreekBasindevelopmentimpactfee.Thefeeincludesconstruction
costsforexistingfacilities,estimatedconstructioncostsforfuturefacilities,financingcosts,and
administrativecosts.SubtractedfromthesecostsisthebalanceoftheSaltCreekDIFreserve
fund.ThetotalcosttoberecoveredfromtheSaltCreekDIFis$27.5million.Thiscostisspread
overtheremainingEDUsinthebasintocalculateafeeof$1,330perEDU.
2
EnvironmentalMitigationdescriptiontakenfromthe2004UpdatetotheSaltCreekSewerBasinPlan
34|Page
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 78
Table 12: DIF Calculation
City of Chula Vista
Salt Creek DIF Study
AmountSource
Cost Category
Outstanding Loan Payments $24,575,429 Table 11
Future Construction Cost 7,603,478 Table 9
Outstanding Developer Credits 0 City Staff
Environmental Mitigation 1,000,000 City Staff
DIF Administration Cost 120,000 City Staff
City Staff
Less: DIF Fund Reserve (5,805,114)
Subtotal $27,493,793
Remaining EDUs 20,668 Table 5
New DIF (per EDU) $1,330
Note: The City will maintain a loan repayment reserve of $1.3
million.
5.10DIFComparison
Table13providesacomparisonbetweenthefeerecommendedinthisstudy,thecurrentfee
(lastupdatedin2004),andahypotheticalfeethatrepresentsthe2004feeescalatedtocurrent
dollars.Thefeerecommendedinthisstudyisthesameasthecurrentfee.
Table 13: DIF Comparison
City of Chula Vista
Salt Creek DIF Study
Fee
Description Amount
2004 Salt Creek Sewer Basin Plan $1,330 per EDU
2004 DIF escalated to 2014 $1,747 per EDU
2015 DIF calculation $1,330 per EDU
Table14providesmoredetailonthechangeincostsattributabletotheSaltCreekDIFbetween
2004and2015.The2004Studycalculatedarevenuerequirementofover$34.1million.In
comparison,thisupdatecalculatesarevenuerequirementofabout$27.5million.The2004
Studyincludedhigherfinancingcostsandloweravailablereservestooffsetconstructioncosts.
This2015StudyincludeshigherprojectcostsfortheRockMountain/MainStreetandHeritage
RoadTrunkSewerlinesandanewprojectΑtheHunteParkwayExtension.
35|Page
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 79
Table 14: Comparison of DIF Studies
City of Chula Vista
Salt Creek DIF Study
Description 2004 Study2015 StudyDifference
Facility Cost/Original Principal $19,846,243 $20,667,477* 4.1%
Future Project Cost
Heritage Road $1,256,000 $2,444,130 94.6%
Rock Mountain Road/Main Street $4,460,000 $4,838,512 8.5%
Hunte Parkway Extension $320,836
Financing Cost $10,788,873 $3,907,952 -63.8%
Environmental Mitigation $1,000,000
Developer Credits $553,472 -100.0%
DIF Administration $120,000
($5,805,114)109.5%
Available Reserve ($2,771,042)
Total $34,133,546$27,493,793 -19.5%
EDUs 25,668 20,668 -19.5%
DIF $1,330 $1,330 0.0%
Note: The City will maintain a loan repayment reserve of $1.3 million.
*The City incurred $267,762 due to additional project costs after the 2004 DIF was
completed.
36|Page
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 80
SECTION6:Conclusions
6.1Recommendations
ToprovideadequatefundingfortheSaltCreekBasinfacilitiesandtopromoteequitybetween
customerswhohavealreadyconnectedtothesystemandfuturecustomers,theCityshould
implementthefollowingrecommendations:
AddtheHunteParkwayExtensionprojectcosttotheDIF
AsDIFfundsareavailable,transferfundsfromtheSaltCreekDIFtotheTrunkSewer
CapitalReserveFundtopayoffthe5LCƭoutstandingloans
MaintaintheSaltCreekDIFof$1,330perEDU
AdjusttheSaltCreekDIFbytheannualchangeintheEngineeringNewswĻĭƚƩķƭ
ConstructionCostIndexforLosAngeles
ConductaDIFstudyatleasteverytenyearstoreflectrevisedlanduseprojectionsand
costinformation
6.2Updates
RecommendedpipelinesizesandlengthhavebeenredeterminedforRockMountain
Road/MainStreetTrunkSewerandHeritageRoadTrunkSewerbasedontheupdated
developmentflowprojectionsin2050.TheHunteParkwayExtensionprojectisrecommended
toaddtotheDIFstudyasitisneededtoeliminateapotentialpipelinefailureattheconnection
toSaltCreekInterceptorintheultimatesystem.ThecapitalimprovementcostsofRock
MountainRoad/MainStreetTrunkSewerandheritageRoadTrunkSewerhavebeenupdated,
andtheHunteParkwayTrunkSewerprojectcostsareaddedtotheSaltCreekDIF.
6.3EnvironmentalReview
The/źƷǤƭDevelopmentServicesDirectorhasreviewedtheimplementationoftheDIFfor
compliancewiththeCaliforniaEnvironmentalQualityAct(CEQA)andhasdeterminedthatthe
proposedactionsarenota"Project"asdefinedunderSection15378oftheStateCEQA
Guidelinesbecausetheactivityconsistsofagovernmentalfiscal/administrativeactivitywhich
doesnotinvolveanycommitmenttoanyspecificprojectwhichmayresultinapotentially
significantphysicalimpactontheenvironment.Therefore,pursuanttoSection15060(c)(3)of
theStateCEQAGuidelinestheactivityisnotsubjecttoCEQA.Thus,noenvironmentalreviewis
required.
Althoughenvironmentalreviewisnotrequiredatthistime,oncethescopeofpotential
individualCityprojectstobefundedhavebeendefined,environmentalreviewwillberequired
foreachprojectandtheappropriateenvironmentaldeterminationwillbemade.
37|Page
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 81
6.4AnnualAdjustment
Capacityfeesanddevelopmentimpactfeesshouldbeadjustedregularlytopreventthemfrom
fallingbehindthecostsofconstructingnewfacilities.Severalmethodscanbeusedtoadjust
thefees,including:
ENRConstructionCostIndex:ENR(EngineeringNewsRecord)magazinepublishes
constructioncostindicesmonthlyforLosAngeles.Thisindexcanbeusedtoestimate
thechangeintheconstructioncostoffacilities.IftheENRIndexhasincreasedbythree
percentsincethelastfeeadjustment,thefeeshouldbeincreasedbythreepercent.
U.S.,California,orregionalconsumerpriceindex.
Interestrateandborrowingcosts:Theinterestandborrowingcostsfordebtissuedto
financesewercapitalprojectscanbeaddedtothecapacityfeeannually.
ItisrecommendedthattheCityadjustitsfeeannuallybythechangeintheENRConstructionCost
IndexforLosAngeles.Thisisthemostappropriateindexbecauseitdirectlyreflectsconstruction
costs.Suggestedlanguageforimplementingthispolicyis:
Eachyear,commencingon(m/d/y)andcontinuingthereafteroneach
(m/d),thecapacityfeeshallbeadjustedbyanincrementbasedonthechange
intheEngineeringNewsRecordConstructionCostIndexforLosAngelesoverthe
prioryear.
However,theCityCouncilmayatitsoptiondetermine,byresolutionadopted
priorthereto,thatsuchadjustmentshallnotbeeffectiveforthenextsucceeding
year,ormaydetermineotheramountsasappropriate.
6.5StudyLimitations
NotethatthisstudyhasbeenpreparedspecificallyforthepurposeofupdatingtheSaltCreek
SewerBasindevelopmentimpactfee.Timingandultimateneedsforadditionalfacilitiesto
servedevelopmentshouldbedeterminedindependentlybytheCity.
38|Page
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 82
APPENDIXA:
DevelopmentAreaWastewaterFlow&EDUProjections
(RemainingOnly)
Bella Lago Remaining Acreage and Units
City of Chula Vista
Salt Creek DIF Study
Wastewater Duty Flow Remaining
Land Use Count Units Factor (gpd) (gpd) EDUs
Single Family 53.00 dwellings 230 12,190 53
Multi-Family 0.00 dwellings 182 0 0
Park 0.00 acres 410 0 0
CPF 0.00 acres 1,313 0 0
School 0.00 acres 1,181 0 0
Commercial 0.00 sq. ft. 0.08 0 0
Commercial 0.00 acres 1,401 0 0
Industrial 0.00 acres 712 0 0
University 0.00 acres 1,080 0 0
12,190 53
Eastlake Woods/Trails Remaining Acreage and Units
City of Chula Vista
Salt Creek DIF Study
Wastewater Duty Flow Remaining
Land Use Count Units Factor (gpd) (gpd) EDUs
Single Family 26.00 dwellings 230 3,450 15
Multi-Family 0.00 dwellings 182 0 0
Park 0.00 acres 410 0 0
CPF 0.00 acres 1,313 0 0
School 0.00 acres 1,181 0 0
Commercial 0.00 sq. ft. 0.08 0 0
Commercial 0.00 acres 1,401 0 0
Industrial 0.00 acres 712 0 0
University 0.00 acres 1,080 0 0
4,450 15
Eastlake Vistas-Lake Pointe & Olympic Pointe Remaining Acreage and Units
City of Chula Vista
Salt Creek DIF Study
Wastewater Duty Flow Remaining
Land Use Count Units Factor (gpd) (gpd) EDUs
Single Family 0.00 dwellings 230 0 0
Multi-Family 230.00 dwellings 182 41,860 182
Park 0.00 acres 410 0 0
CPF 0.00 acres 1,313 0 0
School 0.00 acres 1,181 0 0
Commercial 15,000 sq. ft. 0.08 1,200 5
Commercial 0.00 acres 1,401 0 0
Industrial 0.00 acres 712 0 0
0
University 0.00 acres 1,080 0
43,060 187
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 83
illage 8 West Remaining Acreage and Units
V
City of Chula Vista
Salt Creek DIF Study
Wastewater Duty Flow Remaining
Land Use Count Units Factor (gpd) (gpd) EDUs
Single Family 621.00 dwellings 230 142,830 621
Multi-Family 1,429.00 dwellings 182 260,078 1,131
Park 27.90 acres 410 11,439 50
CPF 5.80 acres 1,313 7,615 33
School 31.60 acres 1,181 37,320 162
Commercial 300,000 sq. ft. 0.08 24,000 104
Commercial 0.00 acres 1,401 0 0
Industrial 0.00 acres 712 0 0
University 0.00 acres 1,080 0 0
483,282 2,101
illage 8 East Remaining Acreage and Units
V
City of Chula Vista
Salt Creek DIF Study
Wastewater Duty Flow Remaining
Land Use Count Units Factor (gpd) (gpd) EDUs
Single Family 943.00 dwellings 230 216,890 943
Multi-Family 2,617.00 dwellings 182 476,294 2,071
Park 7.30 acres 410 2,993 13
CPF 4.20 acres 1,313 5,515 24
School 10.80 acres 1,181 12,755 55
Commercial 20,000 sq. ft. 0.08 1,600 7
Commercial 0.00 acres 1,401 0 0
Industrial 0.00 acres 712 0 0
0
University 0.00 acres 1,080 0
713,0533,113
illage 9 Remaining Acreage and Units
V
City of Chula Vista
Salt Creek DIF Study
Wastewater Duty Flow Remaining
Land Use Count Units Factor (gpd) (gpd) EDUs
Single Family 266.00 dwellings 230 61,180 266
Multi-Family 3,734.00 dwellings 182 679,588 2,955
Park 27.50 acres 410 11,275 49
CPF 5.00 acres 1,313 6,565 29
School 19.80 acres 1,181 23,384 102
Commercial 1,500,000 sq. ft. 0.08 120,000 522
Commercial 0.00 acres 1,401 0 0
Industrial 0.00 acres 712 0 0
University 0.00 acres 1,080 0 0
901,992 3,922
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 84
Regional Technology Park Remaining Acreage and Units
City of Chula Vista
Salt Creek DIF Study
Wastewater Duty Flow Remaining
Land Use Count Units Factor (gpd) (gpd) EDUs
Single Family 0.00 dwellings 230 0 0
Multi-Family 0.00 dwellings 182 0 0
Park 0.00 acres 410 0 0
CPF 0.00 acres 1,313 0 0
School 0.00 acres 1,181 0 0
Commercial 1,850,000 sq. ft. 0.08 148,000 643
Commercial 0.00 acres 1,401 0 0
Industrial 0.00 acres 712 0 0
University 0.00 acres 1,080 0 0
148,000643
The adopted General Plan has a (floor area ratio) FAR of between 0.25 and 0.75 for the
85 acre (3,700,000 sq ft) Regional Technology Park. Based on a City’s FAR
assumption of 0.50 that would generate about 1,850,000 sq ft.
University Remaining Acreage and Units
City of Chula Vista
Salt Creek DIF Study
Wastewater Duty Flow Remaining
Land Use Count Units Factor (gpd) (gpd) EDUs
Single Family 0.00 dwellings 230 0 0
Multi-Family 0.00 dwellings 182 0 0
Park 0.00 acres 410 0 0
CPF 0.00 acres 1,313 0 0
School 0.00 acres 1,181 0 0
Commercial 0.00 sq. ft. 0.08 0 0
Commercial 0.00 acres 1,401 0 0
Industrial 0.00 acres 712 0 0
University 290.00 acres 1,080 313,200 1,362
313,200 1,362
illage 10 Remaining Acreage and Units
V
City of Chula Vista
Salt Creek DIF Study
Wastewater Duty Flow Remaining
Land Use Count Units Factor (gpd) (gpd) EDUs
Single Family 695.00 dwellings 230 159,850 695
Multi-Family 1,045.00 dwellings 182 190,190 827
Park7.60 acres 410 3,116 14
CPF 4.30 acres 1,313 5,646 25
School 9.20 acres 1,181 10,865 47
Commercial 0.00 sq. ft. 0.08 0 0
Commercial 0.00 acres 1,401 0 0
Industrial 0.00 acres 712 0 0
0
University 0.00 acres 1,080 0
369,667 1,607
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 85
illage 11 Remaining Acreage and Units
V
City of Chula Vista
Salt Creek DIF Study
Wastewater Duty Flow Remaining
Land Use Count Units Factor (gpd) (gpd) EDUs
Single Family 0.00 dwellings 230 0 0
Multi-Family 43.00 dwellings 182 16,198 70
Park 0.00 acres 410 0 0
CPF 0.00 acres 1,313 0 0
School 35.00 acres 1,181 38,501 167
Commercial 0.00 sq. ft. 0.08 0 0
Commercial 0.00 acres 1,401 0 0
Industrial 0.00 acres 712 0 0
University 0.00 acres 1,080 0 0
54,699238
Planning Area 20 Remaining Acreage and Units
City of Chula Vista
Salt Creek DIF Study
Wastewater Duty Flow Remaining
Land Use Count Units Factor (gpd) (gpd) EDUs
Single Family 0.00 dwellings 230 0 0
Multi-Family 0.00 dwellings 182 0 0
Park 188.00 acres 410 77,080 335
CPF 0.00 acres 1,313 0 0
School 0.00 acres 1,181 0 0
Commercial 0.00 sq. ft. 0.08 0 0
Commercial 15.00 acres 1,401 21,015 91
Industrial 0.00 acres 712 0 0
University 0.00 acres 1,080 0 0
98,095 427
Birch Foundation Remaining Acreage and Units
City of Chula Vista
Salt Creek DIF Study
Wastewater Duty Flow Remaining
Land Use Count Units Factor (gpd) (gpd) EDUs
Single Family 128.00 dwellings 230 29,440 128
Multi-Family 0.00 dwellings 182 0 0
Park 0.00 acres 410 0 0
CPF 0.00 acres 1,313 0 0
School 0.00 acres 1,181 0 0
Commercial 0.00 sq. ft. 0.08 0 0
Commercial 0.00 acres 1,401 0 0
Industrial 0.00 acres 712 0 0
University 0.00 acres 1,080 0 0
29,440 128
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 86
illage 2 Remaining Acreageand Units
V
City of Chula Vista
Salt Creek DIF Study
Wastewater Duty Flow Remaining
Land Use Count Units Factor (gpd) (gpd) EDUs
Single Family 517.00 dwellings 230 118,910 517
Multi-Family 659.00 dwellings 182 119,938 521
Park 5.10 acres 410 2,091 9
CPF 1.40 acres 1,313 1,838 8
School 9.50 acres 1,181 11,220 49
Commercial 0.00 sq. ft. 0.08 0 0
Commercial 0.00 acres 1,401 0 0
Industrial 36.50 acres 712 25,988 113
University 0.00 acres 1,080 0 0
279,985 1,217
illage 3 Remaining Acreage and Units
V
City of Chula Vista
Salt Creek DIF Study
Wastewater Duty Flow Remaining
Land Use Count Units Factor (gpd) (gpd) EDUs
Single Family 1,002.00 dwellings 230 230,460 1,002
Multi-Family 595.00 dwellings 182 108,290 471
Park 7.90 acres 410 3,239 14
CPF 4.20 acres 1,313 5,515 24
School 8.30 acres 1,181 9,802 43
Commercial 20,000 sq. ft. 0.08 1,600 7
Commercial 11.30 acres 1,401 15,831 69
Industrial 39.90 acres 712 28,409 124
University 0.00 acres 1,080 0 0
403,146 1,753
illage 4 Remaining Acreage and Units
V
City of Chula Vista
Salt Creek DIF Study
Wastewater Duty Flow Remaining
Land Use Count Units Factor (gpd) (gpd) EDUs
Single Family 130.00 dwellings 230 104,190 453
Multi-Family 620.00 dwellings 182 0 0
Park62.80 acres 410 25,748 112
CPF 0.00 acres 1,313 0 0
School 0.00 acres 1,181 0 0
Commercial 0.00 sq. ft. 0.08 0 0
Commercial 0.00 acres 1,401 0 0
Industrial 0.00 acres 712 0 0
University 0.00 acres 1,080 0 0
129,938 565
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 87
illage 7 Remaining Acreage and Units
V
City of Chula Vista
Salt Creek DIF Study
Wastewater Duty Remaining
Land Use Count Units Factor (gpd) Flow (gpd) EDUs
Single Family 313.00 dwellings 230 18,630 81
Multi-Family 33.00 dwellings 182 0 0
Park 0.00 acres 410 0 0
CPF 6.30 acres 1,313 8,272 36
School 0.00 acres 1,181 0 0
Commercial 0.00 sq. ft. 0.08 0 0
Commercial 7.20 acres 1,401 0 0
Industrial 0.00 acres 712 0 0
University 0.00 acres 1,080 0 0
26,902 117
Planning Area 12 (EUC) Remaining Acreage and Units
City of Chula Vista
Salt Creek DIF Study
Wastewater Duty Remaining
Land Use Count Units Factor (gpd) Flow (gpd) EDUs
Single Family 0.00 dwellings 230 0 0
Multi-Family 2,993.00 dwellings 182 544,726 2,368
Park 23.20 acres 4109,51241
CPF 10.70 acres 1,31314,049 61
School 6.00 acres 1,1817,08631
Commercial 3,487,000 sq.ft. 0.08 278,960 1,213
Commercial 0.00 acres 1,401 00
Industrial 0.00 acres 712 00
University 0.00 acres 1,080 00
Permanent Poggi Diversion (113,850) (495)
740,483 3,219
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 88
Salt Creek Basin Remaining Acreage and Units
City of Chula Vista
Salt Creek DIF Study
Flow Remaining
Development Area (gpd)EDUs
Bella Lago 12,190 53
Eastlake Woods/Trails 3,450 15
Eastlake Vistas-Lake Pointe & Olympic Pointe 43,060 187
Village 8 West 483,282 2,101
Village 8 East 713,053 3,113
Village 9901,992 3,922
Regional Technology Park 148,000 643
University 313,200 1,362
Village 10 369,667 1,607
Village 11 54,699 238
Planning Area 20 98,095 427
Birch Foundation 29,440 128
Village 2 279,985 1,217
Village 3 403,146 1,753
Village 4 129,938 565
Village 7 26,902 117
Planning Area 12 (EUC)* 740,483 3,219
Total 4,750,582 20,668
*Net Reduction of 495 EDUs is based on the preferred alternative of
permanently diverting into Poggi Basin 529 EDUs at 215 gpd/EDU
converted to 230 gpd/EDU basis (per EUC Tech Sewer Study PBS&J,
1/2008).
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 89
APPENDIXB:2050LandUseandWastewaterFlowProjections
(ExistingandRemainingConnections)
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 90
0 ¦¤ 91
(Salt Creek Interceptor)
13347; 13385 -/- - 13902;13989 0 10 0 0 554,806 2176/2414 13998; 15066 13954;13935;13925 0 0 0 0 29,440 0/128 12202;12206 15056;15060 9808/30475 -
Bella Lago 140 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32,200 87/140 13347 0 0 0 0 0 244,951 1215/1215 13385; 9123 13902 13902 13902 IECMH10 IECMH44 IECMH22 IECMH50 13941 0 0 20,000 0 0 0 716,046
0/3113 13978 13957 13964 13979 13971 15066 13347
Tributary Manhole
-----
1010/1010 9123;
0 0 8 0 0 212,170 406/523 IECMH26;
0 98,095 0/427 13952;
EDUs within
Salt Creek
EDUs/Total
772 828/843 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 387,646 1685/1685 911/911 0/1217 0/565 1,500,000 0 0 0 901,992 0/3922 0 0 0 1,850,000 0 0 148,000 0/643 0/1362 23 11 6 0 0 0 3,487,000 0 0 0 740,483 0/3219
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 113,932 -/- 0 303,692 1320/1320 743/743 Students Sq. ft. Acre Acre Acre gpd EDUs/EDUs
648 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15,000 0 0 0 119,140 338/525 0 11 40 0 403,146 0/1753 0/2101 0/1621
-/--/--/-
Existing
1
Basin
**
0 279,985 0 757,928 0 130,020 0 198,303 0 483,323 0 369,667 0 149,524
Wastewater
Flow (gpd)
0 232,300 0 460,308 153,057 313,200
93,012 5,342,000 241 221 290 8,820,138
1,022 0 1,767 0 0 0 0 193,
290
University
00
(Acre)
0 0 37 0 20 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 15 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 43 0
(Acre)
00
Ind.
130
(Acre)
Comm.
00
000
(Sq. ft.)
0 20,00
Comm.
0 2,400
Students)
Schl (# of
000000000000000
5 310 493 127 117 2,617 176 4,167
High/High
Jr.
0 65 0 33 79
Unit Unit Unit Rms Acre Acre Acre Students Acre
000000000000000
High/Hig(Acre)
h Sch
Jr.
account for future buildout.
956 189 0 18.6 6 0 795 846 791 0 13 12 0 800
Students)
Elem Sch
00000000000000000
(# of
664 0 0 0 4 0 777 1,043 0 7 12 0 517 659 0 5 1 10 827 2,542 0 19 11 10 1,002 595 0 8 4 8 453 0 0 63 0 0 327 306 0 0 0 0 726 142 0 8 2 0 621 1,429 0 28 6 32 943 2,617 0 7 4 11 266 3,734
0 28 5 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 4 9 *Plng. Area 12 -(Freeway Commercial) (Poggi Basin) 0 650 310 2 0 0 0 0 0 188 0 0 0 0 1,086 116 0 52 28 0
771 253 0 7 4 0 10 12 12
(Acre)
Elem.
000
Sch
(Acre)
000
CPF
0% Return-To-Sewer Ratio to
(Acre)
000
Park
0 2,367 0 128 0 0
(Rms)
000
Hotel
* Land Use Projection in Poggi Basin are shown for hydraulic purposes only.
Creek Basin included in this column.
695 1,045 1,101 1,203
(Unit)
0 626
00020,95
MF
** Flow adopted from Table 3-1 of the 2014 WWMP and assumed 10
OTC 0 University 0 Total 12,846
(Unit)
00
SF
Eastlake Greens & Landswap Development 1
Eastlake Vistas-Lake Pointe & Olympic Pointe
Eastlake Greens & Landswap Development 1
Eastlake Woods and West Development
Plng. Area 12 (EUC) (Salt Creek Basin)
1. Only existing and total EDU's in Salt
*Plng. Area 12 (EUC) (Poggi Basin)
Proposed Development Project
Village 2 (Salt Creek Basin)
Regional Technology Park
*Village 2 (Poggi Basin) *Village 7 (Poggi Basin)
Village 7 (Salt Creek)
Rolling Hills Ranch
(Salt Creek Basin)
Birch Foundation
High Tech High
Eastlake Vistas
Eastlake Trails
Village 8 West
(Poggi Basin)
Village 8 East
Plng. Area 20
Packet
Village 10 Village 11
!¦¤£
Village 3 Village 4 Village 9
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ
APPENDIXC:SaltCreekInterceptor(detail)
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 92
±
!2
!2
!
!
!
2
!
2!
!
2!
!2
!2
!
!
!
!
2
!
!2
!
!
2
!2
!
!
!
2
!
Feet
!2!2
!!
!2
05001,000
!
!2
!
!2
!2
!!
!2
!!
2
!2
!
!
!
2
!
2!
2!
!
!
!
2
!
!2
!
2!
!
!2
!
!2
!
2!
!
2!
!
!2
!
!2
!2
!
!
!
2
!
!2!2
!!
2!
!
!
2
!
!
2
!
!
2
!
!
2
2!
!
!
!2
!
!2
!
!
2!2
!!!
2
!
!2
!
!2
2!
!
!
!
2
!
!
2
!
!2
!
!
2
!2
!
!
2!
!
2!
!
!2
!
2
!
!
!2
!
2!
!
!2
2!
!2
!!
!
2!
!
!
2
!
!
2
!2
!
!
!2
!
!
2
!2
!
!
!2
2!
!
!
2!!
2
!
!
2!
!
!2
!
!
2!2
!
!
2!
2!
!
!!2
!2
!
!
!2
!
2!
!2!
!2
!
!!2
!
2!
!2
!
!
!
2
!
!2
!
2!
!
!2
!
!2
!
!2
!
!2
!
!
2
!
!
!22
!2
!!
!
!
2
!
2!
!
!2
!
!2
!
!
2
!
!2
!
!2
!
!
2
!
!2
!2!
!
2
!
!
!2
!
2
!
!
!2
!!
22
!!2
!!
!
!2
2!!
!2
!
!
!
2
!
!2
!2
!
!2
!
!
!2
!
!2
!
2!
!
!2
!
!
2
!2
R
!O
!UT
E
9
!
2
!
2!
!
2
!!2
!2
!
!
!
!2
!
!
2
!2
!2
!
!
2!
!
!
!
2
!
!
2
!
!2
!
!2
!
2!
!
2
!
!
!2
!
2
!
!
!
2
!2!
!
!
2
!
!2
!
!2
!
!2
!
!
2
!
2!
!
2!
!
!
2
!
2!
2!
!
2!
!
!
2
!
!
!2
!
2
!
!
!2
!!
22
!
!!!
2
!
!2
!2!
2
!!2
!
!
!
!
2
!
!2
!2
!
!
2!
!
!2
2!
!
!
2!
!
!2
!2!
!
!2
!
2!
!
!2
!
!
2
!2
!
!
!2
!
!2
2!
!
!
!2
!
!
2
!
!
2
!
2!
2!
!2
!
!
!
!
2
!2
!
!
!2
!2
!!
!2
2!!2
!
!!
!2
!
!2
!2!
2
!
!
!
!2
!
!2
2!
2!!
!
!!2
!2
!2!
!
!
!2
!
!2
!
2!
!2
2!
!
!
!
!2
!
2!
2!
!
!
!2
!
2
!
!!2
2!2!
!
!
!
!2
!
!
2
!
2
!
!2
!
!
2!
!2
!
2
!
!
!
!2
!
!
2
!
!2
!
!2
!
!2
!
!2
!2
!
!
!
!22
!
2
!!
!
!2
!
!2
!
2!
!
!2
!
2
!2
!
!
!
2!
!
2
!
!
!2
!
!
2
!
!
2
!
2!!2
!
2
!
!
2!
!
2
!
!
!2
!2
!
N
!
O
B
!
2 L
2!
E
!
!2
!C
!
A
N
!Y
2
O
!
N
!
R 2
D
!
!2
!
!
2
2!!!2
!2
!!
!2
!
!
!
2
!2
!
!
2!
!
2
!
!
!2
!2!
!
!
2
!
!
2
!
City of Chula Vista
2!
2!
!2
!!
!
!
2
Salt Creek DIF Study
!2
!
Legend
!
!2
!2
!!
!
2
Existing Manholes
Salt Creek Interceptor
!
!
!22
!
!
Salt Creek Interceptor
!
2
!
!2
November 2014
!
Existing Wastewater Collection Pipelines
!2
!
!
2
!
City of Chula Vista Roads!
2
2!
!
!2
D!
Figure A-1-1
! R
A
T!2
S
!2 I
V
G
!
IN
!L
B
M 2!
A
R
!
Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, i-cubed, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS,
!2!2
2!
!
!2!
!2!
!
!
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community 0 ¦¤ 93
!2
!
±
!22!!
!
!2
!
!2
!
!2!
2
2!
!
!
!
2!
!2
!
!
2!
!2
!
!
Feet
2!
!
2
!
!
C
05001,000
L
2!U
!
!B
2
!H
O
!2
U
!
S
E
2!
D
!
!2
R
!
2!
D
R
!
A
T 2!
IS
!V
2
G
N!
I
L
!B
M!
2
A
R
!
!22!
!2
2!
!!
!2!
!
!
!2
!
!2
!
!
2
!2
!2!
!
!
!
2
!
!2
!
!2
!
2!
!
!
2
2!
!
!
!
2
!
!2
!
!22
!
2
!
!!
!
!2!
2
!
!
!
2
!!
2
!
!2
2!
!
!
!2
2!
!!
2
!
!
!2
!2!
!
!
2
!
!
2
!2
!
!
!2
!2
!
!
!
2
2!
2!
!2
!
!2!2
!
!!2
!
!!
!
!
2
!
!2
2!
!2
!
!
!
!2
!
2
!
!
!
2
!
!2
2!
!
!
!2
!
!2
!
!2
!
!2
!
!2!
2
!
!
!!2
2
!2
!2
!
!
!
!
!
2
2!
2!
!2
!
!
!
!
!2
!
2!
!2
!2!
2
!
!
!
!
2!2
2!
!!
!
!2
!
2!
!
!2!
2
!
!
!2!
2
!
!
!2
!2!
!
!2
2!
!
!
!2
!
!2
!2!
!
!2
!
!2
!2!2
2!
!
!!
!
!2
!
2!
!
2!!2
!!
!2!2
!1
2
5
!2!!
8
!
6
!2
!
2
!
!
2!2
!!
!2
!2!
!2
!
!
!2
2!!
2
!!
!
2!
!
!2
2!
!
!2
!
!
2!
!
!
2
!
2
!
!
!2
!
!2
!
!2
2!
!
2
!
!
!
2!
!
!
2
!2!
!
!2
!2
!
2!
!
!2
!
2
!
!
2!
!
!2
!2
!
!
2!!
2
!2
!
!
!
!
2
2!
!
!
!
2
!
!
2
!
!
2
!!2!
2
2!
!2
!
!
!
!
2!
!
2!
!
!2
2!!
!
!
2
!
2!
2!
!
!
!
2
!
!2
!
!
2
2!
!2!
!
!
!
2
2!
!
!
!
2
!
2!
!2
!
!
2!
!
!2
!
!2
!
!2
2!
!2
!
!
!
!
22!
!!
2!
!
2
!
!
!
2
!
!!
22
!!
!2
!
!2
!!2
!
!2
2!
!
!
2!
!
2!
!
!2
!
2!
!
2!
!
!2!
2
!
!
!
2
!
2!
!
2!
!2
!
!
!2
!
!2
!
!2
!
!2
!!
22
!
!!
!
2
!
!2
!
2!
!
!2
!2
!
!
2!
!
2
!
!
!
2
!
!2
2!
!
!
2!
!
2!
!
!2
!
!2
!
!2
!!2
2
!
!
!
!2
!
!2
2!
!
!
!2
!
2!
!
!2
!
2!
!
!2
!
!2
!!2
!
2!2!2
!
2!
!2!!!
2!!2
!
!!!2
2
!!
!!2
!
!
!2
!
!2
!
2!
!
2!
!
2!
!2
!
!
S
T
A
R
2!
!2
L
I!
G
!
H
T
!2
C
!
T!2
!
!2
!
2!
!
M
O
RN
IN
G
S
TA
R
! D 2!
2 R
!2
!
!
!
!2
!
!2
!2
!
!
!2
!
2!
!2
!
!2
!
!
!2
!
2!
!
!2
!
!!2
2
!
!
2!
!
2!
!
!2
!
City of Chula Vista
!
2
!
Salt Creek DIF Study
Legend
!
2
!
!!
22
!!
!
2
Existing Manholes
Salt Creek Interceptor
!
!
2
!
!2
!
Salt Creek Interceptor
!2
November 2014
!
Existing Wastewater Collection Pipelines
2
!2
City of Chula Vista Roads!
2
!
!
2!
Figure A-1-2
!
!2
!
Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, i-cubed, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS,
!
2
2!!
!
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community 0 ¦¤ 94
±
!2!
2!
!
!
2
!
2!!
2
!
!
!
2
!
Feet
!2
!
05001,000
!2
!
!
2
!
!2
!
!2
!
!2
!
!2
!
!
2
!
!
2
!
2!
!
!
2
!
!2
!
!
2
!
2!
!
!2
!
!
2
!
!2
!
!
2
!
!2!
2
!!
!2
1
!
6
4
7
9
!2
!
!
2
!
2!
!
!
2
!
2!
!
!2
!
!2
!
!2
!
!2
!
!2
!
!
2
!
!2
!
2!
!
!
2
!
!
2
!
!
2
!
!2
!
!2
!
!
2
!
!2
!
!
2
!
!2
!
Legend
!2
!
2!
Existing Manholes
!
Salt Creek Interceptor
2014 WWMP CIP Projects
City of Chula Vista
Project_No
Salt Creek DIF Study
P30
!
2
!
P42
Salt Creek Interceptor
P43
November 2014
Existing Wastewater Collection Pipelines
!2
!
2!
!
!2
City of Chula Vista Roads!
Figure A-1-3
Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, i-cubed, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS,
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community 0 ¦¤ 95
2!
!
17
1
M
CG
IE
AM
WX
LE
L
DR
AM
X
EW
LL
DR
VA KRAP O
TUA
LP KRAP
OTUA
VA E
NIWYDN
ARB
ETAVIRP
DR
MAIN CT
VA EVI
LO
A
R
F
F
O
BN
5
0
8-I
ABS
R 50
F8-I
F
O
B
S
5
0
8-I
239
51
13951
03951
D
R
E
T
A
V
I
R
P
R
D
T
U
N
L
A
W
D
R ETAVIRP
YW YCNEG
ER
RED
YW KE
VA
SOI
R
951
12
V
A MLAP
T
S ETAD
51951
DR E
TAVIRP
VA ED
AJ
34
561
VA
REPS
AJ
34
561
RD
POTLLI
H
44
561
64
561
TS ECAM
74
561
TC D
EER
845
61
YD ETAVIRP
VA
YN
ABL
A
945
61
YD
ETAVI
RP
B
VA RENNA
155
61
TEENA DR
1556
1
DEL MONTE AV
255
61
94
571
VA DR
30
05571
555
61
V
A ONSE
RF
6
5561
V
A HT4
0
75
561
TS
HT70
PRIVATE RD
7556
1
TS H
T70
DR ETAVIRP
85561
0
6561
T
S )BS( HT72
165
61
TS SAVLIS
2656
1
3656
1
T
S AUQC
AJ
5
6
5
6
1
6656
1
6656
1
L
B L
AIR
TS
UDN
I
95
-T
D
C
8
65
61
9
6
56
1
APPENDIXD:SaltCreekImprovementPlan
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 106
APPENDIXE:ProposedTrunkSewers
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 112
3
7
7
3
1
4
9
7
3
1
D
R
GE
A
IT
ER
H
EI
C
MG
1
70
5
4
8
3
1
7
1
1
GM
C
IE
9
87
3
1
APPENDIXF:2050CIPPipelineProposedin2014WWMP
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 114
APPENDIXG:2050PWWFModelResultwithExistingPipelineConditions
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 117
Hydraulic Capacity ning
118
0 ¦¤
47.9%39.5%58.8%54.8%22.6%41.6%69.5%46.5%49.5%46.1%47.8%47.4%49.4%48.7%45.1%36.7%38.6%52.8%58.9%61.4%50.7%
(%)
Remai
PWWF 0.443 0.514 0.350 0.384 .658 0.496 0.259 0.455 0.429 8 0.444 0.447 0.430 0.436 .467 0.538 0.522 0.401 0.349 0.328 0.419
d/D
0.45
00
18,536,797 1,612,292 1,170,749 3,970,860 5,813,364 1,611,317 6,815,019 8,461,259 8,455,290 8,448,813 8,394,764 8,302,994 8,268,133 8,259,700 8,252,685 10,284,394 10,230,837
579 10,206,153
813,030 880,668
PWWF
(gpd)
10,217,
14,464,976 938,912 709,073 2,466,213 4,132,217 938,667 445,343 499,774 5,078,372 6,583,473 6,583,483 6,584,109 6,537,383 6,456,204 6,431,400 6,433,032 6,434,712 8,239,965
8,198,176 8,198,978 8,199,603
PDWF
(gpd)
Conditions
10,662,038 682,894 515,169 1,796,129 3,004,697 682,710 323,686 362,965 3,694,344 4,801,975 4,801,977 4,801,975 4,766,952 4,707,029 4,687,888 4,687,888 4,687,888 6,033,705
6,001,186 6,001,186 6,001,186
ADWF
(gpd)
Pipeline
Material
Pipe
PVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVC
2. 2050 PWWF Model Result with Existing
NORTH CREEKSIDE NORTH CREEKSIDE
PRIVATE RDPRIVATE RDPRIVATE RD
HUNTE PYHUNTE PYHUNTE PY
WILEY RDWILEY RDWILEY RDWILEY RDWILEY RDWILEY RDWILEY RDWILEY RDWILEY RDWILEY RDWILEY RDWILEY RD
MAIN ST
Street
DRDR
Main Street
ek
Salt CreekCreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekeekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekCreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt Creek
Basin Salt Cre
Salt Cr
Salt
Salt
Slope 11.02
1.130.001.318.410.230.514.190.240.250.240.240.301.090.340.350.340.240.621.450.22
(%)
-
Sewer Hydraulic Capacity Analysis T
Length
135.8313.7320.7316.2197.8304.2353.8353.8510.2598.6599.5522.8600.0502.9599.7600.0599.5
(ft.)
72.584.641.936.3
Existing Diameter
(in.)
421815242418151530363636363030303042423636
To MH
140741388113141139801397913847131341338514008139491395013951139521395313954139551395613934139351393613937
ID
City of Chula Vista
February 18, 2015
From
14214138471398014038133471313814016139501395113952139531395413955139561395713935139361393713938
MH ID
91059124
Salt Creek DIF Packet
58
!¦¤£
of
19
Page
128691287013756137591376013761137621376313764137651376613767137681376913770
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ
909791019110911891199182
ID
Hydraulic Capacity ning
119
0 ¦¤
38.9%40.9%54.2%60.5%55.2%57.1%60.4%21.6%81.1%50.0%34.5%33.8%34.1%39.9%40.6%51.4%60.6%53.9%63.6%63.3%52.5%53.2%
%
(%)
Remai
55.4
PWWF 0.519 0.502 0.389 0.336 0.381 0.365 0.337 0.666 0.161 0.425 0.557 0.563 0.560 0.511 0.505 0.413 0.335 0.392 0.309 0.312 0.379 0.404 0.398
d/D
10,196,299 10,187,021 10,180,148 9,517,857 9,509,645 9,502,547 6,831,276 6,819,487 6,814,452 3,453,113 11,941,253 11,910,499 11,898,942 11,885,633 11,871,871 11,850,211
10,438,767 10,423,269 10,409,370 10,380,557 10,370,408 10,358,893 10,351,752
PWWF
(gpd)
8,201,811 8,204,432 8,206,955 7,551,314 7,551,956 7,552,813 5,075,829 5,077,767 078,422 2,180,796 9,664,619 9,658,398 9,650,055 9,650,762 9,651,074 9,641,664 8,251,644
8,252,192 8,252,382 8,237,632 8,237,753 8,237,926 8,238,044
PDWF
(gpd)
5,
Conditions
6,001,186 6,001,186 6,001,186 5,517,873 5,517,873 5,517,873 3,694,344 3,694,344 3,694,344 1,586,625 7,089,984 7,084,608 7,077,797 ,797 7,077,797 7,070,422 6,045,219
6,045,219 6,045,219 6,033,812 6,033,812 6,033,812 6,033,812
ADWF
(gpd)
7,077
Pipeline
Material
Pipe
VC
PVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVC
P
2. 2050 PWWF Model Result with Existing
OLYMPIC PY
PRIVATE RDPRIVATE RDPRIVATE RD
WILEY RDWILEY RDWILEY RDWILEY RDWILEY RDWILEY RDWILEY RDWILEY RDWILEY RDWILEY RDWILEY RDWILEY RDWILEY RD
MAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN ST
Street
Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street
Salt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt Creek
Basin
Slope 45.04
0.222.070.620.620.615.400.111.230.100.100.100.170.101.070.280.280.860.490.230.250.24
(%)23
0.
-
Sewer Hydraulic Capacity Analysis T
Length
600.1475.0304.7439.8394.1598.4299.3177.5594.3136.0598.8599.4521.8449.6682.8599.8599.6437.8498.3310.3438.7
(ft.)
13.0
8
83.
Existing Diameter
(in.)
3636363636363030302042424242424242424242424242
To MH
139381393913940139411394213943139651396714016140021391639871391813919139201392114004139231392413925139261392713928
ID
1
City of Chula Vista
February 18, 2015
From
1393913940139411394213943139441400714008140091401013917139181391913920139211392213923139241392513926139271392813929
MH ID
Salt Creek DIF Packet
58
!¦¤£
of
20
Page
1377113772137731377413775137761377713778137791378013784137851378613787137881378913790137911379213793137941379513796
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ
ID
Hydraulic Capacity ning
120
0 ¦¤
54.0%49.6%52.1%57.5%47.4%47.2%51.8%50.4%66.4%55.8%54.8%52.6%56.9%56.9%57.3%50.7%41.3%54.0%
%0.7%
(%)
Remai
56.9
6
PWWF 0.391 0.428 07 0.361 0.447 0.449 0.410 0.422 0.286 0.376 0.384 0.403 0.366 0.366 0.366 0.363 0.419 0.499 0.391 0.334
d/D
0.4
10,341,474 10,332,170 10,321,887 3,969,729 1,832,897 1,814,999 1,607,534 1,603,896 1,578,400 1,577,837 10,304,608 10,297,944 9,491,476 9,480,593 9,470,068 9,460,090 8,472,790
7,003,531 6,994,031 6,988,956
PWWF
(gpd)
8,238,037 8,238,892 8,239,033 2,466,213 1,029,800 1,023,870 938,049 937,757 929,773 929,781 8,239,202 8,239,549 7,553,838 7,555,084 7,556,790 7,558,982 6,582,858 5,195,406
5,195,896 5,196,119
PDWF
(gpd)
Conditions
6,033,812 6,033,812 6,033,812 1,796,129 749,337 744,968 682,239 682,014 676,024 676,024 6,033,812 6,033,812 5,517,873 5,517,873 5,517,873 5,517,873 4,801,977 3,785,455
3,785,455 3,785,455
ADWF
(gpd)
Pipeline
Material
Pipe
PVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVC
2. 2050 PWWF Model Result with Existing
SOUTH CREEKSIDE SOUTH CREEKSIDE NORTH CREEKSIDE NORTH CREEKSIDE NORTH CREEKSIDE
OTAY LAKES RD
PRIVATE RD
LEY RDWILEY RDWILEY RDWILEY RDWILEY RDDWILEY RDWILEY RDWILEY RDWILEY RDY RDWILEY RDWILEY RD
Street
WILEY R
DRDRDRDRDR
WILE
WI
Salt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt
CreekSalt Creek
Basin
Slope
0.190.190.250.970.470.430.421.770.420.250.220.620.600.620.630.220.341.581.08
(%)1
0.4
-
Sewer Hydraulic Capacity Analysis T
Length
430.4447.1320.4254.0283.8235.6336.6404.7481.8298.9596.5598.4600.0593.7483.4597.3600.0317.3568.0
(ft.)
56.9
Existing Diameter
(in.)
4242422418181818181842423636363636303030
To MH
13929139301393114033140341403814166138491385014006139331394413945139461394713948139571395813959
9124
ID
City of Chula Vista
February 18, 2015
From
13930139311393213988140341403514166140391385013933139341394513946139471394813949139581395913960
MH ID
9123
Salt Creek DIF Packet
58
!¦¤£
of
21
Page
13797137981379913800138011380313804138051380613808811138121381313814138151381613817138181381913820
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ
ID
13
Hydraulic Capacity ning
121
0 ¦¤
58.8%59.5%55.2%49.1%34.4%48.7%45.3%42.5%43.5%53.9%63.9%59.2%58.5%63.5%60.2%50.1%50.8%51.5%53.1%45.3%37.4%24.1%67.9%
(%)
Remai
PWWF 0.350 0.344 0.381 0.433 0.436 0.465 0.489 0.480 0.392 0.307 0.347 0.353 0.310 0.338 0.424 0.418 0.412 0.399 0.465 0.532 0.645 0.273
0.558
d/D
6,979,932 6,970,693 6,969,252 6,967,086 11,920,895 3,966,402 3,828,174 3,827,864 3,822,404 12 3,815,457 3,808,572 3,801,702 3,794,831 7,950 3,471,186 3,478,166 3,464,577
3,457,218 6,835,679 6,829,875 6,825,666 10,914,706
PWWF
(gpd)
3,822,2
3,78
5,196,591 5,196,889 5,196,838 5,197,670 9,658,138 2,466,302 2,360,140 2,360,174 2,360,203 2,360,254 2,360,291 2,360,311 2,360,360 2,360,406 2,360,441 2,180,641 2,180,573
2,180,735 2,180,785 698 5,075,830 5,076,920 8,718,902
PDWF
(gpd)
5,075,
Conditions
3,785,455 3,785,455 3,785,455 3,785,455 7,084,608 1,796,129 1,718,024 1,718,024 1,718,024 1,718,024 1,718,024 1,718,024 1,718,024 1,718,024 1,718,024 1,586,627 1,586,625
1,586,625 1,586,625 3,694,344 3,694,344 3,694,344 6,387,306
ADWF
(gpd)
Pipeline
Material
Pipe
PVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVC
2. 2050 PWWF Model Result with Existing
OLYMPIC PYOLYMPIC PY
PRIVATE RDPRIVATE RDPRIVATE RDPRIVATE RDPRIVATE RDPRIVATE RDPRIVATE RD
HUNTE PYHUNTE PYHUNTE PYHUNTE PYHUNTE PYHUNTE PYHUNTE PYHUNTE PY
WILEY RDWILEY RDLEY RDWILEY RDWILEY RD
MAIN ST
Street
WI
Main Street Main Street
Salt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt
CreekSalt Creek
Basin
Salt C
Slope
1.081.230.770.370.100.340.290.320.531.751.580.851.301.890.890.891.601.110.390.110.111.24
(%)04
2.
-
Sewer Hydraulic Capacity Analysis T
Length
569.7179.7525.1455.9566.6409.1506.1515.0515.0515.0515.0477.2569.1599.4630.7351.3263.4305.8411.6353.5
(ft.)
82.924.617.0
Existing Diameter
(in.)
3030303042242424242424242424242020202030303042
To MH
139601396113962139631391713988139891399013991139921399313994139951399613997140001399813999140011396414007139662
1392
ID
City of Chula Vista
February 18, 2015
From
1396113962139631396413987139891399013991139921399313994139951399613997139981399914000140011400213965139661396714004
MH ID
Salt Creek DIF Packet
58
!¦¤£
of
22
Page
1382113822138231382413825138261382713828138291383013831138321383313834138351383613837138381383913842138431384413845
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ
ID
Hydraulic Capacity ning
122
0 ¦¤
53.9%55.1%62.6%58.8%67.1%66.2%68.7%45.4%40.9%56.0%68.4%58.9%61.2%60.5%34.1%34.2%32.6%32.2%32.0%33.3%
(%)
Remai
PWWF 0.392 0.382 0.318 0.350 0.280 0.287 0.266 0.464 0.502 0.374 0.269 0.349 0.330 0.336 0.560 0.559 0.573 0.576 0.578 0.567
d/D
10,314,481 10,307,422 1,168,144 1,172,696 1,176,670 1,184,469 1,187,391 1,912,212 ,682 1,920,367 1,940,102 1,943,025 1,945,925 1,946,100 11,954,544 11,967,859 12,025,017
12,023,555 12,017,553 12,056,364
PWWF
(gpd)
1,915
8,239,121 8,239,141 709,095 709,057 709,023 713,791 713,739 1,067,678 1,068,460 1,069,301 1,077,296 1,077,290 1,077,432 1,077,431 9,663,906 9,663,215 9,668,989 9,669,210
9,669,396 9,667,814
PDWF
(gpd)
Conditions
6,033,813 33,812 515,169 515,169 515,169 518,763 518,763 776,952 777,561 778,226 784,149 784,149 784,261 7,089,984 7,089,984 7,096,944 7,096,944 6,944 7,096,944
ADWF
784,261
(gpd)
7,09
6,0
Pipeline
Material
Pipe
PVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVC
2. 2050 PWWF Model Result with Existing
SOUTH CREEKSIDE SOUTH CREEKSIDE SOUTH CREEKSIDE SOUTH CREEKSIDE
RUSTIC WOOD STRUSTIC WOOD ST
HAWTHORNE
KES RD
PRIVATE RDPRIVATE RDPRIVATE RDPRIVATE RDPRIVATE RD
HUNTE PY
CREEK DR
MAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN ST
Street
DRDRDRDR
OTAY LA
Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street
Salt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt Creek
Basin
Slope
0.260.342.101.091.031.041.050.440.390.448.021.611.192.580.100.100.100.100.100.10
(%)
-
Sewer Hydraulic Capacity Analysis T
Length
302.4123.1209.4234.4399.0298.1295.6316.2266.9381.8188.6291.4274.4600.0600.0265.4600.0
(ft.)
31.473.273.2
Existing Diameter
(in.)
4242151518181818181818181818424242424242
To MH
139321400513142131431314413878140321403114030140290281402713902142281422013914139151422414227
9105
ID
14
City of Chula Vista
February 18, 2015
From
140051400613140131411314213143131441403314032140311403014029140281402713916142285142241422314226
MH ID
Salt Creek DIF Packet
1391
58
!¦¤£
of
23
Page
138461384715420154212154231542415859158601586115862158631586415866158971589815899159001590115902
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ
1542
ID
Hydraulic Capacity ning
123
0 ¦¤
33.5%33.9%32.5%34.5%33.8%32.2%32.7%32.2%42.1%40.1%58.2%50.4%46.1%36.4%35.5%39.9%36.8%31.8%47.3%60.5%56.7%56.6%
.7%
(%)
Remai
32
PWWF 0.565 0.562 0.574 0.557 0.563 0.572 0.576 0.572 0.576 0.492 0.509 0.355 0.422 0.458 0.541 0.548 0.511 0.537 0.580 0.448 0.336 0.368 0.369
d/D
12,029,515 12,043,140 12,008,301 11,981,124 11,995,190 12,559,825 12,091,283 12,064,745 12,081,142 18,525,453 23,066 18,532,511 18,525,977 18,474,673 18,522,478 18,511,933
18,503,077 98,313 18,495,297 18,494,914 18,487,714 18,480,711 18,478,503
PWWF
(gpd)
18,518,4
9,668,848 9,668,526 9,661,834 9,662,527 9,662,715 10,009,119 9,685,331 9,669,933 9,678,590 14,462,132 14,461,572 14,463,868 14,462,129 14,457,524 14,461,586 14,460,407
14,464,839 14,488,750 14,492,771 14,559,598 14,673,527 14,798,331 15,092,724
PDWF
(gpd)
Conditions
7,096,944 7,096,944 7,090,708 7,089,984 7,090,708 7,371,351 7,111,132 7,099,023 7,105,853 10,659,887 10,659,463 10,661,198 10,659,888 10,656,357 10,659,463 10,658,563
10,657,319 10,656,857 10,656,857 10,656,857 10,656,693 10,656,693 10,656,508
ADWF
(gpd)
Pipeline
Material
Pipe
PVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVC
PV
2. 2050 PWWF Model Result with Existing
OTAY VALLEY RDOTAY VALLEY RDOTAY VALLEY RDOTAY VALLEY RDOTAY VALLEY RDOTAY VALLEY RDOTAY VALLEY RDOTAY VALLEY RDTAY VALLEY RD
PRIVATE RD
MAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN ST
DATE STDATE ST
Street
O
Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main
Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street
Basin
Slope
0.100.100.100.100.100.100.100.100.100.450.531.111.420.390.240.330.400.160.721.571.401.301.17
(%)
-
Sewer Hydraulic Capacity Analysis T
Length
199.4600.0600.0600.0598.1955.5146.8268.5331.5204.4400.3133.4177.3129.1298.6298.6
(ft.)
78.026.322.6.718.183.890.8
46
Existing Diameter
(in.)
4242424242424242424242424242424242424242424242
To MH
142251422614223142211422214235142111421314212140711421514214140701411414216142181423214099142191410342291423014231
ID
1
City of Chula Vista
February 18, 2015
From
1391414225142221422014221142111421214227142131421514216140701407114217142181409714099142191410314229142301423114113
MH ID
Salt Creek DIF Packet
58
!¦¤£
of
24
Page
159034159051590615907159081590915910159121591315914159151591615917159181591915920159211592215923159241592515926
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ
1590
ID
Hydraulic Capacity ning
124
0 ¦¤
56.9%37.3%36.9%49.4%48.6%34.7%33.2%65.2%65.3%46.7%67.5%67.8%64.6%44.0%39.7%14.8%24.1%55.3%49.2%13.1%18.0%49.3%
(%)
7.7%
Remai
PWWF 0.366 0.533 0.536 0.430 0.437 0.555 0.568 0.296 0.295 0.453 0.276 0.274 0.301 0.420 0.452 0.639 0.692 0.569 0.335 0.381 0.652 0.615 0.380
d/D
18,476,178 18,473,583 18,507,498 18,473,147 12,588,211 12,578,885 12,572,322 1,163,108 1,166,413 1,685,726 ,092 1,758,771 1,760,520 1,824,814 1,827,288 829,634
1,831,977
880,374 877,617 819,523 816,461 527,239 548,859
PWWF
(gpd)
1,756
1,
14,694,889 3 14,459,080 14,457,541 10,007,914 10,007,981 10,008,253 709,145 709,118 499,846 499,916 445,185 445,327 437,717 449,437 1,540,522 1,608,319 1,608,317 1,608,316
1,670,272 1,670,269 1,670,268 1,670,266
PDWF 14,478,01
(gpd)
Conditions
10,656,357 10,656,357 10,657,552 10,656,357 7,371,351 7,371,351 7,371,351 515,169 515,169 362,965 362,965 323,686 323,686 317,847 326,373 1,115,554 1,164,154 1,164,154
1,164,154 1,208,566 1,208,566 1,208,566 1,208,566
ADWF
(gpd)
Pipeline
Material
Pipe
PVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVC
PV
2. 2050 PWWF Model Result with Existing
OTAY VALLEY RDOTAY VALLEY RD
STONE GATE ST
WANDER ST
TRELLIS ST
HUNTE PYHUNTE PYHUNTE PYHUNTE PYHUNTE PYHUNTE PYHUNTE PYHUNTE PYHUNTE PYHUNTE PYHUNTE PYHUNTE PYHUNTE PY
MAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN ST
Street
Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street
Salt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt Creek
Basin
Slope 10.13
1.440.680.301.490.100.100.102.102.251.212.191.250.941.081.040.871.541.111.316.80
(%).049
8.0
1
-
Sewer Hydraulic Capacity Analysis T
Length
176.3268.5400.0289.7567.9276.7398.1336.9400.5381.1410.5248.3288.6383.8400.5261.2349.3369.9350.6350.0
(ft.)
63.819.282.0
Existing Diameter
(in.)
4242424242424215151515151510101212121212121212
To MH
1411314217140971411514116142331423413139131401313813137131361313515058150661505615059150671506015061150621506315065
ID
City of Chula Vista
February 18, 2015
From
14114141151423214116233142341423513385131391313713136131351313415046150581506615056150591506715060150611506215063
MH ID
Salt Creek DIF Packet
58
14
!¦¤£
of
25
Page
15927159281592915930159311593215933163141631531616317163181631916461164621646316464164651647616477164781647916480
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ
ID
16
Hydraulic Capacity ning
125
0 ¦¤
50.8%13.5%66.6%65.8%35.1%26.9%60.6%48.9%60.2%59.2%46.5%47.1%58.4%60.6%58.4%52.7%52.7%49.2%31.6%41.6%49.3%49.2%52.2%
(%)
Remai
PWWF 0.369 0.649 0.284 0.291 0.552 0.621 0.335 0.434 0.338 0.347 0.455 0.450 0.354 0.335 0.354 0.402 0.402 0.432 0.581 0.496 0.431 0.432 0.406
d/D
1,833,483 1,835,736 3,447,469 3,447,638 3,449,467 3,449,932 3,451,041 18,549,559 18,561,210 18,566,515 18,579,894 18,595,525 18,612,651 18,632,396 18,633,493 ,296 18,658,146
18,660,226 18,701,194 18,716,960 18,731,271 18,748,018 18,749,337
PWWF
(gpd)
18,646
1,670,266 1,670,263 2,180,835 0,834 2,180,827 2,180,805 2,180,804 14,465,000 14,464,974 14,469,512 14,471,011 14,472,631 14,475,957 14,482,012 14,482,005 14,482,855 14,483,595
14,484,015 14,496,510 14,498,289 4,498,572 14,501,290 14,501,566
PDWF
(gpd)
2,18
1
Conditions
1,208,566 1,208,566 1,586,625 1,586,625 1,586,625 1,586,625 1,586,625 10,662,067 2,067 10,665,544 10,666,698 10,667,994 10,670,567 10,675,218 10,675,217 10,675,879 10,676,451
10,676,782 10,687,026 10,688,505 10,688,764 10,690,883 10,691,107
ADWF
(gpd)
10,66
Pipeline
Material
Pipe
PVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVC
2. 2050 PWWF Model Result with Existing
OLYMPIC PYOLYMPIC PYOLYMPIC PYOLYMPIC PY
PRIVATE DY
PRIVATE RDPRIVATE RD
HUNTE PY
MAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN ST
Street
Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street
Main Street
Salt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt Creek
Basin
Slope 10.32
1.133.437.521.710.446.360.351.361.341.120.291.251.241.990.710.710.720.220.220.770.480.76
(%)
-
Sewer Hydraulic Capacity Analysis T
Length
225.0336.9112.6156.5544.2499.2507.5600.0590.0585.0510.7474.30600.0600.0600.0
(ft.)
14.440.494.732.947.371.145.0
600.
Existing Diameter
(in.)
1212212121212042424242424242424242424242424242
To MH
1506415069140121401314014140251015114140691406814067140661408214077140651407214073140951412914128141271412614125
ID
140
City of Chula Vista
February 18, 2015
From
1506515064139021401214013140141402514074151141406914068140671406614082140771406514072140731391114129141281412714126
MH ID
Salt Creek DIF Packet
58
!¦¤£
of
26
Page
1648116482164921649316494164951649616543165441654516546165471654816549165501655116552165531655516556165571655816559
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ
ID
Hydraulic Capacity ning
126
0 ¦¤
10.1%
50.0%52.2%54.4%50.1%44.2%46.2%46.6%34.9%25.4%50.9%39.1%60.8%70.7%69.9%42.5%43.3%42.9%52.1%19.4%
(%)
Remai
-
PWWF 0.425 0.406 0.388 0.424 74 0.457 0.454 0.553 0.634 0.417 0.518 0.333 0.249 0.256 0.431 0.425 0.428 0.407 0.826 0.685
d/D
0.4
18,756,685 18,771,862 18,788,030 18,809,261 18,810,426 18,814,457 18,827,142 18,836,052 18,840,832 21,336,539 21,362,783 1,588,647 1,580,049 1,000,174 1,000,076 1,190,186
1,840,389 6,253,256
1,595,419
PWWF
998,659
(gpd)
14,502,963 14,504,079 14,506,217 14,514,008 14,513,986 14,514,168 14,514,319 14,514,255 14,516,811 16,444,885 16,444,768 936,029 932,391 929,917 969,140 969,140 969,140
713,716 1,670,259 4,565,719
PDWF
(gpd)
Conditions
10,692,180 10,693,030 10,694,703 10,700,703 10,700,703 10,700,837 10,700,968 10,700,968 10,702,777 ,245 12,147,306 680,687 677,952 676,133 701,077 701,077 701,077 518,763
1,208,566 3,317,897
ADWF
(gpd)
12,147
Pipeline
Material
Pipe
PVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVC
2. 2050 PWWF Model Result with Existing
NORTH CREEKSIDE NORTH CREEKSIDE NORTH CREEKSIDE
INDUSTRIAL BL
OTAY LAKES RD
5 NB ON RA5 NB ON RA
JACQUA ST PRIVATE RDPRIVATE RD
HUNTE PYHUNTE PYHUNTE PY
MAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN ST
Street
DRDRDR
--
II
Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street ain Street Main Street Main Street Main Street
Salt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt Creek
Basin
M
Slope
0.630.620.910.740.490.380.650.350.272.600.383.212.972.631.882.081.042.510.580.23
(%)
-
Sewer Hydraulic Capacity Analysis T
Length 1127.4
254.1600.0600.0575.0164.2535.6384.2211.0304.5182.5149.8211.8399.9336.8174.0406.7
(ft.)
51.292.9
4.7
1
Existing Diameter
(in.)
4242424242424242424242181818121212151224
To MH GTWY_ OUTFAL
MH_03
L_9152
1391214117141201412214121141231411914124141181403914040140411506615288152891398013978
9123
ID
City of Chula Vista
February 18, 2015
From
12513912141171412014122141211412314119141241400314118140401404113849152881528915287138781553813979
MH ID
Salt Creek DIF Packet
58
14
!¦¤£
of
27
Page
1656016561165621656316564165651656616567165681656916570167491675116753168071680816809170861709317094
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ
ID
Hydraulic Capacity ning
127
0 ¦¤
20.9%24.4%25.6%60.0%60.7%61.6%63.9%65.6%63.1%55.3%48.9%40.2%46.9%44.9%25.6%47.4%55.9%49.9%43.3%
(%)
Remai
PWWF 0.672 0.643 0.632 0.340 0.334 0.326 0.307 0.292 0.314 0.380 0.434 0.508 0.451 0.413 0.558 0.447 0.375 0.426 0.482
d/D
6,257,928 6,260,069 6,261,967 6,264,634 6,267,701 6,279,204 6,282,131 6,286,756 6,797,883 6,802,998 6,807,656 6,811,739 6,814,240 1,836,593 1,839,226 1,714,982 18,673,610
18,685,755 21,322,878
PWWF
(gpd)
4,564,596 7 4,564,051 4,564,040 4,563,999 4,573,428 4,573,401 4,573,346 5,080,252 5,079,927 5,079,410 5,079,018 5,078,428 1,670,263 1,670,262 982,741 14,486,741 14,495,089
16,436,157
PDWF
4,564,26
(gpd)
Conditions
3,317,897 3,317,897 3,317,897 3,317,897 3,317,897 3,325,144 144 3,325,144 3,694,344 3,694,344 3,694,346 3,694,344 3,694,344 1,208,566 1,208,566 715,006 10,678,874 10,685,896
12,140,562
ADWF
(gpd)
3,325,
Pipeline
Material
Pipe
PVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVC
2. 2050 PWWF Model Result with Existing
NORTH CREEKSIDE
INDUSTRIAL BL
PRIVATE RDPRIVATE RDPRIVATE RDPRIVATE RDPRIVATE RDPRIVATE RDPRIVATE RDPRIVATE RDPRIVATE RDPRIVATE RDPRIVATE RDRDPRIVATE RDPRIVATE RDPRIVATE RD
MAIN STMAIN ST
PRIVATE
Street
DR
in Street Main Street Main Street
Salt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt Creek
Basin
is hydraulically deficient under 2050 PWWF condition.
Ma
Slope
0.230.240.263.303.113.894.096.325.304.251.451.450.385.103.940.420.712.540.23
(%)
-
Sewer Hydraulic Capacity Analysis T
Length
400.0187.4164.5200.0231.3154.2220.5348.9283.3400.0377.9328.1177.3128.1393.6303.9455.3144.7602.4
(ft.)
Existing Diameter
(in.)
24242424242424242424242430121218424242
To MH
13977139761397514026139741397313972139711398513970139691396814009155421553814035159531391114003
ID
City of Chula Vista
February 18, 2015
From
GTWY_
MH_03
139781397713976139751402613974139731397213971139851397013969139681506915542138811409515953
MH ID
Salt Creek DIF Packet
58
Red
!¦¤£
of
*Pipe ID in
28
59
Page
170951709617097170981709917100171011710217103171041710517106171071711117112175281754917550
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ
-
ID
CDT
APPENDIXH:2050PWWFModelResultwithProposedFutureDiameters
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 128
Project
No.
129
0000000000000000000000
0 ¦¤
Hydraulic Capacity Remainin
g (%)
47.9%39.5%58.8%54.8%22.6%41.6%69.5%46.5%49.5%46.0%47.8%47.4%49.4%48.7%45.1%36.7%38.6%52.8%58.9%61.4%50.7%38.9%
PWWF
0.440.510.350.380.660.500.260.460.430.460.440.450.430.440.470.540.520.400.350.330.420.52
d/D
18,563,491 10,287,452 10,233,939 10,220,721 10,209,316 10,199,631
PWWF
1,612,2951,170,7563,970,8815,813,3511,611,3206,815,1968,462,9718,456,9318,450,4258,396,1238,304,0318,269,0308,260,4888,253,312
813,036880,672
(gpd)
14,493,145
2,466,1994,131,9495,078,4836,585,1686,585,1326,585,7456,538,7726,457,1646,432,2416,433,727,2078,241,7568,200,0018,200,8228,201,45711
PDWF
938,910709,075938,665445,342499,774
(gpd)
8,203,8
6,435
Diameters
10,669,356 1,796,129 3,004,697 3,694,344 4,801,975 4,801,977 4,801,975 4,766,952 4,707,029 4,687,888 4,687,888 4,687,888 6,033,705 6,001,186 6,001,186 6,001,186
6,001,186
682,894 515,169 682,710 323,686 362,965
ADWF
(gpd)
Proposed Future
Material
Pipe
PVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVC
3. 2050 PWWF Model Result with
TH CREEKSIDE NORTH CREEKSIDE
PRIVATE RDPRIVATE RDPRIVATE RD
PY
HUNTE PYHUNTE PY
WILEY RDWILEY RDWILEY RDWILEY RDWILEY RDWILEY RDWILEY RDWILEY RDWILEY RDWILEY RDWILEY RDWILEY RDWILEY RD
MAIN ST
Street
HUNTE
DRDR
NOR
Main Street
Salt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt
CreekSalt CreekSalt Creek
Basin
Slope
11.021.0890.237
(%)
1.130.001.318.410.230.514.190.240.250.240.240.300.340.350.340.621.450.220.22
-
Sewer Hydraulic Capacity Analysis
T
Length
135.8313.7320.7316.2197.8304.2353.8353.8510.2598.6599.5522.8600.0502.9599.700.0599.5600.1
(ft.)
72.584.641.936.3
6
Diameter Proposed in 2014 WWMP
(in.)
42181524241815153036363636303030304242363636
14074 13881 13141 13980 13979 13847 13134 13385 14008 13949 13950 13951 13952 13953 13954 13955 13956 13934 13935 13936 13937 13938
To
MH
City of Chula Vista
February 18, 2015
Salt Creek DIF Packet
From 14214 13847 13980 14038 13347 13138 14016 13950 13951 13952 13953 13954 13955 13956 13957 13935 13936 13937 13938 13939
91059124
58
MH
!¦¤£
of
29
Page
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ
12869128701375613759137601376113762137631376413765137661376713768137691377013771
909791019110911891199182
ID
Project
No.
130
00000000000000000000000
0 ¦¤
Hydraulic Capacity Remainin
g (%)
40.9%54.2%60.4%55.2%57.1%60.4%21.6%81.1%53.5%34.5%33.8%34.1%39.9%40.6%51.4%60.6%53.9%63.6%63.3%55.4%52.5%53.2%54.0%
PWWF
0.500.390.340.380.370.340.670.160.400.560.560.560.510.510.410.340.390.310.310.380.400.400.39
d/D
10,190,523 10,183,679 11,943,216 11,912,448 11,900,877 11,887,537 11,873,768 ,852,096 10,441,600 10,426,114 10,412,224 10,383,422 73,282 10,361,775 10,354,640 10,344,355
PWWF
9,521,2029,512,974,505,8276,831,5056,819,6766,814,6213,453,113
(gpd)
10,3
11
9
8,206,5928,209,2027,554,1027,554,7447,555,5855,075,9545,077,8815,078,5212,180,7959,665,9749,659,7459,651,3969,652,0949,652,4069,642,9958,253,3878,253,9248,254,1108,239,3578,239,4788,239,6508,239,7668
,239,755
PDWF
(gpd)
Diameters
6,001,186 6,001,186 5,517,873 5,517,873 5,517,873 3,694,344 3,694,344 3,694,344 1,586,625 7,089,984 7,084,608 7,077,797 7,077,797 7,077,797 7,070,422 6,045,219 6,045,219
6,045,219 6,033,812 6,033,812 6,033,812 6,033,812 6,033,812
ADWF
(gpd)
Proposed Future
Material
Pipe
PVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVC
3. 2050 PWWF Model Result with
OLYMPIC PY
PRIVATE RDPRIVATE RDPRIVATE RD
WILEY RDWILEY RDWILEY RDWILEY RDWILEY RDWILEY RDWILEY RDWILEY RDWILEY RDWILEY RDWILEY RDWILEY RDWILEY RD
MAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN ST
Street
Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street
Salt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt Creek
Basin
Slope
.040.099
(%)86
0.232.070.620.620.615.400.111.230.100.100.170.101.070.280.280.490.230.250.240.19
0.
-
45
Sewer Hydraulic Capacity Analysis
T
Length
.8
475.0304.7394.1598.4299.3177.5594.3136.0598.8599.4521.8449.6682.8599.8599.6437.8498.3310.3438.7430.4
(ft.)
83.813.0
439
Diameter Proposed in 2014 WWMP
(in.)
3636363636303030214242424242424242424242424242
13939 13940 13941 13942 13943 13965 13967 14016 14002 13916 13987 13918 13919 13920 13921 14004 13923 13924 13925 13926 13927 13928 13929
To
MH
City of Chula Vista
February 18, 2015
Salt Creek DIF Packet
From 13940 13941 13942 13943 13944 14007 14008 14009 14010 13917 13918 13919 13920 13921 13922 13923 13924 13925 13926 13927 13928 13929 13930
58
MH
!¦¤£
of
30
Page
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ
1377213773137741377513776137771377813779137801378413785137861378713788137891379013791137921379313794137951379613797
ID
Project
No.
131
00000000000000000000
0 ¦¤
Hydraulic Capacity Remainin
g (%)
49.6%52.1%57.5%47.4%47.2%51.8%50.4%66.4%55.8%54.8%52.6%56.9%56.9%56.9%57.3%50.7%41.3%54.0%60.7%58.8%
PWWF
0.430.410.360.450.450.410.420.290.380.380.400.370.370.370.360.420.500.390.330.35
d/D
10,335,131 ,859 10,307,585 10,300,954
PWWF
3,969,7491,832,9031,815,0051,607,5381,603,9011,578,4041,577,8419,494,7029,483,7429,473,0939,462,8758,474,4567,003,9646,994,4506,989,3646,980,334
(gpd)
10,324
8,240,6428,240,7842,466,1991,029,7991,023,8698,240,9448,241,3097,556,5977,557,8207,559,4707,561,5226,584,5055,195,6655,196,1425,196,3545,196,820
PDWF
938,048937,755929,772929,779
(gpd)
Diameters
6,033,812 6,033,812 1,796,129 6,033,812 6,033,812 517,873 5,517,873 5,517,873 5,517,873 4,801,977 3,785,455 3,785,455 3,785,455
749,337 744,968 682,239 682,014 676,024 676,024
3,785,455
ADWF
(gpd)
Proposed Future
5,
Material
Pipe
PVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVC
3. 2050 PWWF Model Result with
SOUTH CREEKSIDE SOUTH CREEKSIDE NORTH CREEKSIDE NORTH CREEKSIDE NORTH CREEKSIDE
OTAY LAKES RD
PRIVATE RD
WILEY RDWILEY RDWILEY RDWILEY RDWILEY RDWILEY RDWILEY RDWILEY RDWILEY RDWILEY RDWILEY RDWILEY RDWILEY RD
Street
DRDRDRDRDR
Salt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt
CreekSalt Creek
Basin
Slope
0.4310.423
(%)
0.190.250.970.470.410.421.770.250.220.620.600.620.630.220.341.581.081.08
-
Sewer Hydraulic Capacity Analysis
T
Length
447.1320.4254.0283.8235.6336.6404.7481.8298.9596.5598.4600.0593.7483.4597.3600.0317.3568.0569.7
(ft.)
56.9
Diameter Proposed in 2014 WWMP
(in.)
4242241818181818184242363636363630303030
13930 13931 14033 14034 14038 14166 13849 13850 14006 13933 13944 13945 13946 13947 13948 13957 13958 13959 13960
To
9124
MH
City of Chula Vista
February 18, 2015
Salt Creek DIF Packet
From 13931 13932 13988 14034 14035 14166 14039 13850 13933 13934 13945 13946 13947 13948 13949 13958 13959 13960 13961
9123
58
MH
!¦¤£
of
31
Page
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ
1379813799138001380113803138041380513806138081381113812138131381413815138161381713818138191382013821
ID
Project
No.
132
00000000000000000000000
0 ¦¤
Hydraulic Capacity Remainin
g (%)
59.5%55.2%49.1%34.4%48.7%45.3%42.5%43.5%53.9%63.9%59.2%58.5%63.5%60.2%53.5%53.5%54.9%56.2%45.3%37.4%24.1%67.9%53.9%
PWWF
0.340.380.430.560.440.470.490.480.390.310.350.350.310.340.400.400.380.370.470.530.650.270.39
d/D
11,922,852 17,943 10,317,456
PWWF
6,971,0776,969,6366,967,4163,966,4213,828,1843,827,8733,822,4123,822,2213,815,4663,808,581801,7113,794,8383,787,9593,471,1853,478,1645773,457,2186,835,9106,830,1036,825,871
(gpd)
3,464,
10,9
3,
5,197,1000485,197,8249,659,4882,466,2882,360,136732,360,2002,360,2512,360,2872,360,3082,360,3572,360,4022,360,4362,180,6402,180,5722,180,7332,180,7845,075,8335,075,9545,077,0348,721,1388,240,869
PDWF
(gpd)
2,360,1
5,197,
Diameters
3,785,455 3,785,455 3,785,455 7,084,608 1,796,129 1,718,024 1,718,024 1,718,024 1,718,024 1,718,024 1,718,024 1,718,024 1,718,024 1,718,024 1,586,625 1,586,625 1,586,625
1,586,625 3,694,344 3,694,344 3,694,344 6,387,306 6,033,813
ADWF
(gpd)
Proposed Future
Material
Pipe
PVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVC
3. 2050 PWWF Model Result with
OLYMPIC PYOLYMPIC PY
PRIVATE RDPRIVATE RDPRIVATE RDPRIVATE RDPRIVATE RDPRIVATE RDPRIVATE RDPRIVATE RD
HUNTE PYHUNTE PYHUNTE PYHUNTE PYHUNTE PYHUNTE PYHUNTE PYHUNTE PY
WILEY RDWILEY RDWILEY RDWILEY RD
MAIN ST
Street
Main Street Main Street
Salt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt
CreekSalt CreekSalt Creek
Basin
Slope
1.5771.597
(%)
1.230.770.370.100.340.290.320.531.750.851.301.890.890.892.041.110.390.110.111.240.26
-
Sewer Hydraulic Capacity Analysis
T
Length
6
179.7525.1455.9409.1506.1515.0515.0515.0515.0477.2569.1599.4630.7351.3263.4305.8411.6353.5302.4
(ft.)
82.9566.24.617.0
Diameter Proposed in 2014 WWMP
(in.)
3030304224242424242424242424212121213030304242
13961 13962 13963 13917 13988 13989 13990 13991 13992 13993 13994 13995 13996 13997 14000 13998 13999 14001 13964 14007 13966 13922 13932
To
MH
City of Chula Vista
February 18, 2015
Salt Creek DIF Packet
From 13962 13963 13964 13987 13989 13990 13991 13992 13993 13994 13995 13996 13997 13998 13999 14000 14001 14002 13965 13966 13967 14004 14005
58
MH
!¦¤£
of
32
Page
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ
1382213823138241382513826138271382813829138301383113832138331383413835138361383713838138391384213843138441384513846
ID
Project
No.
133
00000000000000000000
0 ¦¤
Hydraulic Capacity Remainin
g (%)
55.1%62.6%58.8%67.1%66.2%68.7%45.4%40.9%56.0%68.4%58.9%61.2%60.5%34.1%34.2%32.6%32.2%32.0%33.3%33.5%
PWWF
0.380.320.350.280.290.270.460.500.370.270.350.330.340.560.560.570.580.580.570.57
d/D
10,310,396 11,956,514 11,969,834 12,027,020 12,025,557 12,019,555 12,058,380 12,031,520
PWWF
1,168,1511,172,704,176,6791,184,4711,187,3941,912,2191,915,6881,920,3741,940,1091,943,0321,945,9311,946,107
(gpd)
1
8,240,8851,067,6781,068,4611,069,3021,077,2971,077,2931,077,4341,077,4329,665,2709,664,5879,670,4099,670,6279,670,8109,669,2539,670,270
PDWF
709,096709,059709,027713,786713,737
(gpd)
Diameters
6,033,812 089,984 7,089,984 7,096,944 7,096,944 7,096,944 944 7,096,944
515,169 515,169 515,169 518,763 518,763 776,952 777,561 778,226 784,149 784,149 784,261 784,261
ADWF
(gpd)
7,096,
Proposed Future
7,
Material
Pipe
PVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVC
3. 2050 PWWF Model Result with
SOUTH CREEKSIDE SOUTH CREEKSIDE SOUTH CREEKSIDE SOUTH CREEKSIDE
RUSTIC WOOD STRUSTIC WOOD ST
HAWTHORNE
OTAY LAKES RD
PRIVATE RDPRIVATE RDPRIVATE RDPRIVATE RD
HUNTE PY
CREEK DR
MAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN ST
Street
DRDRDRDR
Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street
Salt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt Creek
Basin
Slope
(%)
0.34.101.091.031.041.05.440.390.448.021.611.192.580.100.100.100.100.100.100.10
-
20
Sewer Hydraulic Capacity Analysis
T
Length
123.1209.4234.4399.0298.1295.6316.2266.9381.8188.6291.4274.4600.0600.0265.4600.0199.4
(ft.)
31.473.273.2
Diameter Proposed in 2014 WWMP
(in.)
4215151818181818181818181842424242424242
14005 13142 13143 13144 13878 14032 14031 14030 14029 14028 14027 13902 14228 14220 13914 13915 14224 14227 14225
To
9105
MH
City of Chula Vista
February 18, 2015
Salt Creek DIF Packet
From 14006 13140 13141 13142 13143 13144 14033 14032 14031 14030 14029 14028 14027 13916 14228 13915 24 14223 14226 13914
58
MH
!¦¤£
142
of
33
Page
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ
1384715420154211542215423154241585915860158611586215863641586615897158981589915900159011590215903
ID
158
Project
No.
134
00000000000000000000000
0 ¦¤
Hydraulic Capacity Remainin
g (%)
33.9%32.5%34.5%33.8%32.7%32.1%32.6%32.2%42.0%40.1%58.2%50.4%46.0%36.4%35.4%39.9%36.8%31.8%47.3%60.5%56.7%56.6%56.9%
PWWF
0.560.570.560.560.570.580.570.580.490.510.360.420.460.540.550.510.540.580.450.340.370.370.37
d/D
12,045,148 12,010,298 11,983,105 11,997,180 12,585,799 12,093,362 12,066,774 12,083,190 18,552,145 18,549,757 18,559,202 18,552,669 18,501,384 18,549,173 18,538,632 8,529,780 18,525,018
18,522,003 18,521,626 18,514,426 18,507,423 18,505,215 8,502,888
PWWF
(gpd)
11
10,023,232 14,493,839 14,492,462 14,494,775 14,494,628 14,551,232 14,508,649 14,568,492 14,627,071 14,661,239 14,661,926 14,739,863 14,858,906 15,012,032 15,321,891 14,900,687
9,669,9539,663,2419,663,9099,664,1099,686,8209,671,3879,680,059
PDWF
(gpd)
Diameters
7,096,944 7,090,708 7,089,984 08 7,378,667 7,111,132 7,099,024 7,105,854 5 10,666,781 10,668,516 10,667,205 10,663,677 10,666,781 10,665,881 10,664,637 10,664,173 10,664,173
10,664,173 10,664,011 10,664,011 10,663,826 10,663,677
ADWF
10,667,20
(gpd)
7,090,7
Proposed Future
Material
Pipe
PVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVC
3. 2050 PWWF Model Result with
OTAY VALLEY RDEY RDOTAY VALLEY RDOTAY VALLEY RDOTAY VALLEY RDOTAY VALLEY RDOTAY VALLEY RDLLEY RDOTAY VALLEY RDOTAY VALLEY RD
PRIVATE RD
MAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN ST
DATE STDATE ST
Street
OTAY VALL
OTAY VA
Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main
Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street
Basin
Slope
0.098
(%)
0.100.100.100.100.100.100.100.450.531.111.420.390.240.330.400.160.721.571.401.171.44
1.3
-
Sewer Hydraulic Capacity Analysis
T
Length
600.0600.0600.0598.1955.5146.8268.5331.5204.4400.3133.4177.3129.1298.6298.6
(ft.)
78.026.322.646.718.183.890.863.8
Diameter Proposed in 2014 WWMP
(in.)
4242424242424242424242424242424242424242424242
14226 14223 14221 14222 14235 14211 14213 14212 14071 14215 14214 14070 14114 14216 14218 14232 14099 14219 03 14229 14230 14231 14113
To
MH
141
City of Chula Vista
February 18, 2015
Salt Creek DIF Packet
From 14225 14222 14220 14221 14211 14212 14227 14213 14215 14216 14070 14071 14217 14218 14097 14099 14219 14103 14229 14230 14231 14113 14114
58
MH
!¦¤£
of
34
Page
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ
1590415905159061590715908159091591015912159131591415915161591715918159191592015921159221592315924159251592615927
ID
159
Project
No.
P29P29P43P43P43P43P43P43P43P43P43
135
000000000000
0 ¦¤
Hydraulic Capacity Remainin
g (%)
37.2%36.9%49.3%48.5%35.1%33.8%65.2%65.3%46.7%67.5%67.8%64.6%68.1%67.6%54.5%51.7%58.5%74.3%72.3%53.9%55.9%70.9%73.7%
PWWF
0.530.540.430.440.550.560.300.300.450.280.270.300.240.240.340.360.310.190.210.350.330.220.20
d/D
18,500,293 18,534,201 18,499,859 12,614,214 12,604,890 12,598,327
PWWF
1,163,1141,166,4201,685,7261,756,0931,758,7711,760,5201,824,8141,827,2881,829,6351,831,9781,833,483
20
880,377819,526816,468527,239548,859
(gpd)
877,6
14,633,080 14,591,889 14,470,404 10,022,092 10,022,165 10,022,426
1,540,5221,608,3191,608,3171,608,3171,670,2721,670,2701,670,2691,670,2681,670,268
PDWF
709,145709,118499,843499,913445,182445,329437,717449,437
(gpd)
Diameters
10,663,677 10,664,872 10,663,677 7,378,667 7,378,667 7,378,667 1,115,554 1,164,154 1,164,154 1,164,154 1,208,566 1,208,566 1,208,566 1,208,566 1,208,566
515,169 515,169 362,965 362,965 323,686 323,686 317,847 326,373
ADWF
(gpd)
Proposed Future
Material
Pipe
PVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVC
3. 2050 PWWF Model Result with
OTAY VALLEY RD
STONE GATE ST
ST
TRELLIS ST
Y
HUNTE PYHUNTE PYHUNTE PYHUNTE PYHUNTE PYHUNTE PYHUNTE PYHUNTE PYHUNTE PYHUNTE PYHUNTE PYHUNTE PYHUNTE PY
MAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN ST
HUNTE P
Street
WANDER
Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street
Salt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt Creek
Basin
Slope 10.315
0.30110.13
(%)
0.681.490.100.100.102.102.251.212.191.250.941.081.041.040.871.548.091.111.316.80
-
Sewer Hydraulic Capacity Analysis
T
Length
176.3268.5400.0289.7567.9276.7398.1336.9400.5381.1410.5248.3288.6383.8400.5261.2349.3369.9350.6350.0225.0
(ft.)
19.282.0
Diameter Proposed in 2014 WWMP
(in.)
4242424242421515151515151515181818181818181818
14217 14097 14115 14116 14233 14234 13139 140 13138 13137 13136 13135 15058 15066 15056 15059 15067 15060 15061 15062 15063 15065 15064
To
MH
13
City of Chula Vista
February 18, 2015
Salt Creek DIF Packet
From 14115 14232 14116 14233 14234 14235 13385 13139 13137 13136 13135 13134 15046 15058 15066 15056 15059 15067 15060 15061 15062 15063 15065
58
MH
!¦¤£
of
35
Page
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ
15928159291593015931159321593316314163151631616317163181631916461164621646316464164651647616477164784791648016481
ID
16
Project
No.
P43
136
0000000000000000000000
0 ¦¤
Hydraulic Capacity Remainin
g (%)
%8%
54.0%65.8%35.1%26.9%63.2%60.2%59.2%46.4%46.9%58.2%60.6%58.4%52.6%52.7%49.1%31.5%41.6%49.3%49.2%52.1%50.0%
66.6
48.
PWWF
0.350.280.290.550.620.310.440.340.350.460.450.360.340.350.400.400.430.580.500.430.430.410.43
d/D
18,576,248 18,587,896 18,593,198 18,606,576 18,622,192 18,639,310 18,659,052 18,660,148 18,672,949 18,684,796 ,686,874 18,727,831 18,743,574 18,757,878 18,774,618 18,775,937 18,783,284
PWWF
1,835,7383,447,4693,447,6383,449,4673,449,9303,451,039
(gpd)
18
14,484,011 14,481,307 14,485,080 14,485,935 14,486,124 14,489,152 14,495,052 14,495,010 14,495,816 14,496,503 14,496,902 14,509,339 14,511,169 14,511,465 14,514,185 ,460 14,515,857
1,670,2662,180,8322,180,8322,180,8272,180,8022,180,802
PDWF
(gpd)
14,514
Diameters
1,208,566 1,586,625 1,586,625 1,586,625 1,586,625 1,586,627 10,669,383 10,669,383 10,672,861 10,674,014 10,675,312 10,677,885 10,682,536 10,682,536 10,683,197 10,683,770
10,684,100 10,694,344 10,695,822 10,696,082 10,698,201 10,698,425 10,699,497
ADWF
(gpd)
Proposed Future
Material
Pipe
PVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVC
3. 2050 PWWF Model Result with
OLYMPIC PYOLYMPIC PYOLYMPIC PY
PIC PY
PRIVATE DY
PRIVATE RDPRIVATE RD
MAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN ST
Street
OLYM
Main Street Main Street Main Street t Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street
Main Street
Salt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekMain Stree
Basin
Slope
1.119
(%)
1.133.437.521.710.446.340.351.361.340.291.251.241.990.710.710.720.220.220.770.480.760.63
-
Sewer Hydraulic Capacity Analysis
T
Length
0
336.9112.6156.5544.2499.2507.5600.0590.0585.0510.7474.3600.0600.0600.0254.1
(ft.)
14.440.494.732.947.371.1600.45.0
Diameter Proposed in 2014 WWMP
(in.)
1821212121214242424242424242424242424242424242
15069 14012 14013 14014 14025 14010 15114 14069 14068 14067 14066 14082 14077 14065 14072 14073 14095 14129 14128 14127 14126 14125 13912
To
MH
City of Chula Vista
February 18, 2015
Salt Creek DIF Packet
From 15064 13902 14012 14013 14014 14025 14074 15114 14069 14068 14067 14066 14082 14077 14065 14072 14073 13911 14129 14128 14127 14126 14125
58
MH
!¦¤£
of
36
Page
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ
1648216492164931649416495164961654316544165451654616547165481654916550165511655216553165551655616557165581655916560
ID
Project
No.
P29P29P29 P30
137
000000000000000
0 ¦¤
Hydraulic Capacity Remainin
g (%)
52.2%54.4%50.1%44.2%46.2%46.6%34.9%25.3%50.9%39.1%60.8%70.7%69.9%58.1%58.7%58.5%52.1%44.7%19.4%
PWWF
0.410.390.420.470.460.450.550.640.420.520.330.250.260.310.310.310.410.420.69
d/D
18,798,460 18,814,624 18,835,848 18,837,012 18,841,042 18,853,727 18,862,633 18,867,300 21,361,532 21,387,779
PWWF
1,595,4211,588,6501,580,0531,000,1741,000,0761,190,1901,840,3926,253,276
998,659
(gpd)
14,516,973 14,519,112 14,526,904 14,526,884 14,527,066 14,527,217 14,527,159 14,529,695 16,457,705 16,457,597
1,670,2654,565,699
PDWF
42
6,023932,390929,916969,140969,140713,714
(gpd)
969,1
93
Diameters
10,700,349 10,702,021 10,708,020 0 10,708,155 10,708,285 10,708,285 10,710,094 12,154,563 12,154,624 1,208,566 3,317,897
680,687 677,952 676,133 701,077 701,077 701,077 518,763
ADWF
10,708,02
(gpd)
Proposed Future
Material
Pipe
PVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVC
3. 2050 PWWF Model Result with
NORTH CREEKSIDE NORTH CREEKSIDE NORTH CREEKSIDE
INDUSTRIAL BL
OTAY LAKES RD
NB ON RA
5 NB ON RA
PRIVATE RDPRIVATE RD
JACQUA ST
HUNTE PYHUNTE PYHUNTE PY
MAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN STMAIN ST
Street
DRDRDR
5
--
II
Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street Main Street
Salt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt Creek
Basin
Slope
2.083
(%)
0.620.910.740.490.380.650.350.272.600.383.212.972.631.881.042.510.580.23
-
Sewer Hydraulic Capacity Analysis
T
Length 1127.4
600.0600.0575.0164.2535.6384.2211.0304.5182.5149.8211.8399.9336.8174.06.7
(ft.)
51.292.914.7
40
Diameter Proposed in 2014 WWMP
(in.)
42424242424242424242181818151515151824
14117 14120 14122 14121 14123 14119 14124 GTWY_MH_14118 OUTFALL_9 14039 14040 14041 15066 15288 15289 13980 13978
To
9123
152
MH
03
City of Chula Vista
February 18, 2015
Salt Creek DIF Packet
From 13912 14117 14120 14122 14121 14123 19 14124 14003 14118 14040 14041 13849 15288 15289 15287 13878 15538 13979
58
MH
!¦¤£
141
of
37
Page
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ
16561165621656316564165651656616567165681656916570167491675116753168071680816809170861709317094
ID
Project
2
No.
-
P43P42
138
SCP
00000000000000000
0 ¦¤
Hydraulic Capacity Remainin
g (%)
20.9%24.4%25.6%60.0%60.7%61.6%63.9%65.6%63.1%55.3%48.9%40.2%46.9%68.7%66.7%47.4%55.8%49.9%43.3%61.5%
PWWF
0.670.640.630.340.330.330.310.290.310.380.430.510.450.240.250.450.380.43.480.29
d/D
0
18,700,258 18,712,403 21,347,870
PWWF
6,257,9756,260,1246,262,0306,264,7016,267,7716,279,2806,282,2126,286,8406,797,9616,803,1036,807,7816,811,8886,814,4051,836,5951,839,2281,714,988
471,885
(gpd)
14,499,612 14,507,954 16,448,977
4,564,6174,2994,564,0904,564,0834,564,0484,573,486,573,4634,573,4135,080,2525,079,9635,079,4655,079,0975,078,5211,670,2661,670,265
PDWF
982,738471,884
(gpd)
4,56
Diameters
4
3,317,897 3,317,897 3,317,897 3,317,897 3,317,897 3,325,144 3,325,144 3,325,144 3,694,344 3,694,344 3,694,346 3,694,344 1,208,566 1,208,566 10,686,191 10,693,214 12,147,879
715,006 342,086
3,694,344
ADWF
(gpd)
Proposed Future
Material
Pipe
PVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVC
-
3. 2050 PWWF Model Result with
NORTH CREEKSIDE
INDUSTRIAL BL
PRIVATE RDPRIVATE RDPRIVATE RDPRIVATE RDPRIVATE RDPRIVATE RDPRIVATE RDPRIVATE RDPRIVATE RDPRIVATE RDPRIVATE RDPRIVATE RDPRIVATE RDPRIVATE RDPRIVATE RDPRIVATE RD
MAIN STMAIN ST
Street
DR
Main Street Main Street Main Street
Salt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt Creek
Basin
Slope
3.944
(%)
0.230.240.263.303.113.894.096.325.304.251.451.450.385.100.420.712.540.230.40
-
Sewer Hydraulic Capacity Analysis
T
Length
400.0187.4164.5200.0231.3154.2220.5348.9283.3400.0377.9328.1177.3128.1393.6303.9455.3144.7602.4865.7
(ft.)
Diameter Proposed in 2014 WWMP
(in.)
2424242424242424242424243018181842424215
13977 13976 13975 14026 13974 13973 13972 13971 13985 13970 13969 13968 14009 15542 15538 14035 15953 13911 14003 IECMH
To
MH
36
City of Chula Vista
February 18, 2015
Salt Creek DIF Packet
From 13978 13977 13976 13975 14026 13974 13973 13972 13971 13985 13970 13969 13968 15069 15542 13881 14095 15953 GTWY_MH_IECMH
58
MH
0330
!¦¤£
of
38
Page
IECGM101
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ
59
170951709617097170981709917100171011710217103171041710517106171071711117112175281754917550
-
ID
CDT
Project
111111222222
No.
------------
P30
139
SCPSCPSCPSCPSCPSCPSCPSCPSCPSCPSCPSCP
00
0 ¦¤
Hydraulic Capacity Remainin
g (%)
9%
65.5%65.6%55.3%44.9%44.4%46.4%62.8%59.0%51.2%70.0%61.9%16.8%12.0%22.7%
65.
PWWF
0.260.260.340.410.420.400.280.210.240.230.260.290.710.440.66
d/D
PWWF
4,670,8265,813,201
385,315385,275385,188940,859940,795940,736469,734134,500134,378292,887292,814471,974697,854
(gpd)
PDWF
385,317385,275385,188940,859940,795940,736469,729134,500134,378292,887292,814471,974
(gpd)
---
Diameters
279,971 279,971 279,971 683,117 683,117 683,117 342,086 212,148 212,148 342,086
ADWF
97,032 97,032
(gpd)
---
Proposed Future
Material
Pipe
PVCPVC
-------------
Hunte Pkwy Extension
3. 2050 PWWF Model Result with
MAGDALENA AV
MTN RD
MAXWELL RD
HERITAGE RDHERITAGE RDHERITAGE RD
LA MEDIA RDLA MEDIA RD
ENERGY WYENERGY WY
PRIVATE RDPRIVATE RDPRIVATE RDPRIVATE RD
Street
-
ROCK
Salt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt CreekSalt Creek
Basin
Slope
(%)
0.400.410.400.400.400.400.400.400.400.400.400.400.270.580.23
-
Sewer Hydraulic Capacity Analysis
T
Length 1349.9 1211.3 1027.2 4295.4 1041.9 1005.3 1933.6 1167.2
844.96.1897.4709.0174.0294.5
(ft.)
22.1
93
Diameter Proposed in 2014 WWMP
(in.)
151515151515151212151515241224
IECMHIECMHIECMHIECMHIECMH13922 14004 IECMHIECMHIECMHIECMHIECMHIECMH13980 13979
To
MH
4042444648562628223058
City of Chula Vista
February 18, 2015
Salt Creek DIF Packet
From IECMHIECMHIECMHIECMHIECMHIECMHCMHIECMHIECMHIECMHIECMHIECMH13980 15538 IECMH
58
MH
10404244464836505626282258
!¦¤£
of
IE
39
Page
IECGM107 IECGM109 IECGM111 IECGM113 IECGM115 IECGM117 IECGM119 IECGM121 IECGM127 IECGM87 IECGM89 IECGM91
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ
9119_B
17093
9119
ID
Project Hunte Hunte
PkwyPkwy
No.
140
0 ¦¤
Hydraulic Capacity Remainin
g (%)
51.9%40.5%
PWWF
0.360.45
d/D
PWWF
1,142,5421,142,542
(gpd)
PDWF
(gpd)
--
Diameters
ADWF
(gpd)
--
Proposed Future
Material
Pipe
--
3. 2050 PWWF Model Result with
PRIVATE RD
Street
-
Salt CreekSalt Creek
Basin
Slope
(%)
0.940.51
-
Sewer Hydraulic Capacity Analysis
T
Length
237.3
(ft.)
12.2
Diameter Proposed in 2014 WWMP
(in.)
1616
IECMHIECMH
To
MH
6058
City of Chula Vista
February 18, 2015
Salt Creek DIF Packet
From 15538 IECMH
58
MH
60
!¦¤£
of
40
Page
IECGM161 IECGM163
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ
ID
APPENDIXI:SaltCreekSewerLateralImprovementsΑBondEstimate
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 141
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 142
APPENDIXJ:WolfCanyonSewerTrunkFacilities
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 143
144
0 ¦¤
Packet
!¦¤£
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ
City of Chula Vista
Staff Report
File#:15-0352, Item#: 4.
RESOLUTIONOFTHECITYCOUNCILOFTHECITYOFCHULAVISTAAWARDINGA
CONTRACTFORPROVIDINGSEWERMANHOLEINSPECTIONANDEVALUATIONSERVICES
TO PROFESSIONAL PIPE SERVICES
Council adopt the resolution.
SUMMARY
TheCityowns,operates,andmaintainsmorethan12,000sewermanholes.Theassessmentof
approximately3,300sewermanholeswascompletedinFiscalYear2013-14.Thiscontractwould
inspectandevaluatetheremaining8,700sewermanholesinordertoprioritizetheSewerManhole
RehabilitationCapitalImprovementProgram.Staffrecommendsthatacontractbeawardedto
Professional Pipe Services for providing manhole inspection and evaluation services.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
TheDevelopmentServicesDirectorhasreviewedtheproposedactivityforcompliancewiththe
CaliforniaEnvironmentalQualityAct(CEQA)andhasdeterminedthattheactivityqualifiesfora
Class6categoricalexemptionpursuanttoSection15306\[InformationCollection\]oftheStateCEQA
Guidelinesbecausetheactivityconsistsofbasicdatacollectionandevaluationofpotentially
deterioratedmanholesthroughoutthecity.Thus,nofurtherenvironmentalreviewisrequiredatthis
time.Althoughenvironmentalreviewisnotrequiredatthistime,oncethescopeofanindividual
projecttobefundedhasbeendefined,environmentalreviewwillberequiredandtheappropriate
environmental determination will be made.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
Not Applicable
DISCUSSION
TheCityofChulaVistaowns,operates,andmaintainsmorethan12,000sewermanholes.
Inspectionandassessmentofapproximately3,300manholeswerecompletedinthepastyear.
Approximately8,700manholesstillrequireassessment.Someofthesemanholeshavebeenin
servicefornearly95years.Overtime,thesemanholeshavebeenexposedtowastewater
environmentandmighthavesustainedseveredeterioration.Inaddition,severalmanholesinthe
olderpartoftheCityareinpoorconditionandrecommendedimprovementsareneededtoextend
their life cycle.
Acompleteassessmentofall12,000sewermanholesisneededtoestablishabaselineforthe
WastewaterAssetManagementProgram.Staffrecommendsthereassessmentofallsewer
manholesevery10to15years.Inthecasethatsomeofthesemanholesarefoundinpoor
condition,situatedwithintheproximityofpumpstations,orlocateddirectlyupstreamofmajortrunk
sewers,thereassessmentisrecommendedevery5to7years.Alldatageneratedfromthisworkwill
City of Chula VistaPage 1 of 3Printed on 7/16/2015
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 145
File#:15-0352, Item#: 4.
beincorporatedintotheCity’sGISsystemandwillplayavitalroleintheWastewaterAsset
Management Program.
Consultant Selection Process
OnMarch6,2015,theCityadvertisedaRequestforProposals(RFP)forinspectingandevaluating
theremainingmanholes.Subsequently,theCityreceivedproposalsfromProfessionalPipe
Services,Inc.(PPS)andTranConsultantEngineers.Duringtheselectionprocess,TranConsultant
Engineerswithdrewtheirproposal.StaffnegotiatedwithPPSafixedcontractpriceof$90per
manhole for the next four years.
PPShasextensiveexperienceinmanholeinspectionandevaluationservices.Citystaffhasbeen
satisfiedwiththeworkpreviouslyperformedbyPPSunderaseparatecontractandrecommendsthat
CityCounciladopttheresolutionawardingthecontracttoPPS.Theinitialtermforthiscontractis
fromthedateonwhichitisexecuteduntilJune30,2016.Sincetheworkwilltakeuptofouryearsto
complete,thecontractcontainsthree1-yearoptionstoextendonthesametermsandconditions
(includingthefeeof$90permanhole),whichmaybeexercisedattheCityEngineer’sdiscretion,to
ensurethatalloftheworkcanbecompleted.Itisanticipatedthatalloftheworkwillbecompletedby
FY 2018-19.
Disclosure Statement
Attachment 1 is a copy of the Contractor’s Disclosure Statement
DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT
Staffhasreviewedthedecisioncontemplatedbythisactionandhasdeterminedthatitisnotsitespecificand
consequently,the500-footrulefoundinCaliforniaCodeofRegulationssection18705.2(a)(11),isnotapplicabletothis
decision.Staffisnotindependentlyaware,andhasnotbeeninformedbyanyCouncilmember,ofanyotherfactthat
may constitute a basis for a decision maker conflict of interest in this matter.
LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS
TheCity’sStrategicPlanhasfivemajorgoals:OperationalExcellence,EconomicVitality,HealthyCommunity,Strong
andSecureNeighborhoodsandaConnectedCommunity.Thisprojectsupportstheoperationalexcellenceand
economicvitalitygoalsintheCity’sstrategicplans.Itbettermanagesthefundingforplanningmanholerehabilitation
Capital Improvement Program which is a key city function in supporting the City’s sewer infrastructure.
CURRENT YEAR FISCAL IMPACT
ApprovaloftheresolutionwillresultinnoadditionalimpacttotheSewerFacilityReplacementFundasfundingforthis
project was approved as part of the FY 2015-16 budget process; funding was appropriated to CIP SW296.
ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT
Tonight’sactionauthorizesthecumulativecompensationamountofupto$800,000($200,000forthefirstyearand
$200,000foreachoftheextensions)tocompletetheassessmentworkofallthesewermanholescitywide;fundingfor
yearoneofthecontracthasbeenappropriatedinCIPSW296.FutureappropriationsfromtheSewerFacility
ReplacementFundwillberequestedaspartofthenormalbudgetprocessinFiscalYears2016-17,2017-18,and2018-
19 in order to complete this project.
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment 1: Contractor’s Disclosure Statement
Prepared by: Jamal Naji, Associate Civil Engineer, Public Works-Engineering Department
City of Chula VistaPage 2 of 3Printed on 7/16/2015
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 146
File#:15-0352, Item#: 4.
City of Chula VistaPage 3 of 3Printed on 7/16/2015
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 147
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 148
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 149
RESOLUTION NO. __________
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR PROVIDING
SEWER MANHOLE INSPECTION AND EVALUATION
SERVICES TO PROFESSIONAL PIPE SERVICES
WHEREAS,the City of Chula Vista owns, operates, andmaintains more than 12,000
sewer manholes; and
WHEREAS, some of these manholes have been in service for nearly 95 years and might
have sustained some deterioration; and
WHEREAS, inspection and evaluation of approximately 3,300 manholes were completed
in the pastyear and the remaining approximately 8,700manholes still require assessment; and
WHEREAS, on March 6, 2015, the City of Chula Vista’s Engineering Division
advertised a Request for Proposals (RFP) for inspecting and evaluating the remaining 8,700
sewer manholes; and
WHEREAS, on March 18, 2015, the City of Chula Vista’s Engineering Division
received two proposals for providing manhole inspection and evaluation services; and
WHEREAS, one of the consultants submitting a proposal withdrew his proposal; and
WHEREAS, City staff has been satisfied with the work completed by Professional Pipe
Services (PPS) under a different contract in the past year; and
WHEREAS, the Consultant selection process has been conducted in accordance with
Section 2.56.110 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, Consultant warrants and represents that it is experienced and staffed in a
manner such that it can deliver the services required of Consultant to City in accordance with the
time frames and the termsand conditions of the Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula
Vista, that it approvesawarding a contract for providing sewer manhole inspection and
evaluation services to Professional Pipe Services,in the formpresented, with such minor
modifications as may be required or approved by the City Attorney, a copy of which shall be
kept on file in the Office of the City Clerk, and authorizes and directs the Mayor to execute
same.
Presented byApproved as to form by
C:\\Users\\GRANIC~1\\AppData\\Local\\Temp\\BCL Technologies\\easyPDF 7\\@BCL@14063ACB\\@BCL@14063ACB.doc
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 150
Resolution No.
Page 2
__________________________________________________
Richard A. HopkinsGlen R. Googins
Director of Public WorksCity Attorney
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 151
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 152
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 153
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 154
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 155
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 156
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 157
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 158
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 159
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 160
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 161
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 162
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 163
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 164
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 165
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 166
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 167
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 168
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 169
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 170
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 171
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 172
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 173
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 174
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 175
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 176
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 177
City of Chula Vista
Staff Report
File#:15-0289, Item#: 5.
A.RESOLUTIONOFTHECITYCOUNCILOFTHECITYOFCHULAVISTAAMENDINGTHE
COMPENSATIONSCHEDULEANDCLASSIFICATIONPLANTOREFLECTTHEADDITIONAND
REMOVALOFVARIOUSPOSITIONTITLES,AMENDINGTHEAUTHORIZEDPOSITIONCOUNT
INVARIOUSDEPARTMENTSWITHNONETCHANGEINAUTHORIZEDSTAFFING,AND
APPROPRIATING FUNDS THEREFOR (4/5 VOTE REQUIRED)
B.RESOLUTIONOFTHECITYCOUNCILOFTHECITYOFCHULAVISTAAPPROVINGTHE
REVISEDFISCALYEAR2015-2016COMPENSATIONSCHEDULEASREQUIREDBY
CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, TITLE 2, SECTION 570.5
C.ORDINANCEOFTHECITYOFCHULAVISTAAMENDINGCHULAVISTAMUNICIPALCODE
SECTION2.05.010RELATINGTOTHEESTABLISHMENTOFUNCLASSIFIEDPOSITIONSTO
ADDFAIVDC-LECCEXECUTIVEDIRECTOR,FAFINANCIALMANAGERANDFASENIOR
FINANCIALANALYSTANDDELETECBAGIV-LECCDIRECTOR(FIRSTREADING)(4/5VOTE
REQUIRED)
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Council adopt the resolutions and place the ordinance on first reading.
SUMMARY
AspartoftheCity’songoingefforttomaintaintheclassificationplan,HumanResourcesstaff
completedseveraldepartmentandemployee-initiatedclassificationreviewsonvariouspositionsto
determineifthepermanentandon-goingdutiesandresponsibilitiesofthepositionswereassignedto
theappropriateclassifications.Additionally,theCityAttorneyisproposingasalaryincreaseforthe
Law Office Manager.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
TheDevelopmentServicesDirectorhasreviewedtheproposedactivityforcompliancewiththe
CaliforniaEnvironmentalQualityAct(CEQA)andhasdeterminedthattheactivityisnota“Project”as
definedunderSection15378(b)(2)oftheStateCEQAGuidelinesbecauseitisapersonnelrelated
action;therefore,pursuanttoSection15060(c)(3)oftheStateCEQAGuidelinestheactivityisnot
subject to CEQA. Thus, no environmental review is necessary.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
TheCivilServiceCommissionadoptedtheamendmenttotheclassificationplan,subjecttothefinal
approval of the City Council, at their July 9, 2015 meeting.
DISCUSSION
CivilServiceRule1.02(A),whichappliestotheCity’sclassifiedpositions,providesfornecessary
City of Chula VistaPage 1 of 4Printed on 7/16/2015
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 178
File#:15-0289, Item#: 5.
reviewsandchangessothattheCity’sclassificationplaniskeptcurrent,andthatchangesinexisting
classes,theestablishmentofnewclassesortheabolitionofclassesareproperlyreflectedinthe
classification plan.
HumanResourcesstaffconductedclassificationreviewsonvariouspositionstodetermineifthe
permanentandon-goingdutiesandresponsibilitiesofthepositionswereassignedtotheappropriate
classifications.
The following identifies the affected positions, departments and proposed changes.
TheCityAttorney’sOfficeisproposinganincreaseinthesalaryoftheLawOfficeManager,an
unclassified,“atwill”position,toreflectwhattheCityAttorneyhasdeterminedtobeincreasedduties
andexpectationsbeyondthosereflectedintheposition’scurrentdescription.Alackofcomparable
positionsinthelocalandregionalmarketpreventsasalarysurveyfrombeingcompletedforthis
classification.
Summary of Proposed New Classifications and Updated Classifications
City of Chula VistaPage 2 of 4Printed on 7/16/2015
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 179
File#:15-0289, Item#: 5.
ThetitlesofCBAGIV-LECCDirector,InternI,InternIIandInternIIIwillbeeliminatedfromthe
Compensation Schedule and Classification Plan.
CaliforniaCodeofRegulations,Title2,Section570.5requiresthat,forpurposesofdetermininga
retiringemployee'spensionallowance,thepayratebelimitedtotheamountlistedonapayschedule
thatmeetscertainrequirementsandbeapprovedbythegoverningbodyinaccordancewiththe
requirementsoftheapplicablepublicmeetinglaws.TheFiscalYear2015-2016Compensation
Schedule("CompensationSchedule")wasoriginallyapprovedbytheCityCouncilattheirmeetingof
June16,2015.ApprovalofResolutionBwillapprovetherevisedCompensationScheduletoreflect
theadditionoftheAccountsPayableSupervisor,FAIVDC-LECCExecutiveDirector,FASenior
FinancialAnalyst,FAFinancialManager,SeniorElectronicsTechnician,Intern(Undergraduate),
Intern(Graduate)positiontitlesandsalaries;theremovaloftheCBAGIV-LECCDirector,InternI,
InternIIandInternIIIpositiontitlesandsalaries;thesalarychangesforLawOfficeManager,
PrincipalHumanResourcesAnalyst,PublicInformationSpecialistandSeniorCouncilAssistant;and
the bargaining unit change for Risk Management Specialist and Senior Risk Management Specialist.
Lastly,ChulaVistaMunicipalCodeSection2.05.010alsoneedstobeupdatedtoreflecttheposition
changesimpactingtheunclassifiedpositions.ChulaVistaCityCharterSection500requiresthatall
unclassifiedpositionsnotmentionedspecificallyinCharterSection500beadoptedbyordinance.
AdoptionoftheordinancewilladdthepositiontitlesofFAIVDC-LECCExecutiveDirector,FASenior
Financial Analyst and FA Financial Manager and delete the CBAG IV-LECC Director position title.
City of Chula VistaPage 3 of 4Printed on 7/16/2015
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 180
File#:15-0289, Item#: 5.
DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT
Staffhasdeterminedthattheactioncontemplatedbythisitemisministerial,secretarial,manual,or
clericalinnatureand,assuch,doesnotrequiretheCityCouncilmemberstomakeorparticipatein
makingagovernmentaldecision,pursuanttoCaliforniaCodeofRegulationsTitle2,section18702.4
(a).Consequently,thisitemdoesnotpresentaconflictunderthePoliticalReformAct(Cal.Gov't
Code§87100,etseq.).Staffisnotindependentlyaware,andhasnotbeeninformedbyanyCity
Councilmember,ofanyotherfactthatmayconstituteabasisforadecisionmakerconflictofinterest
in this matter.
LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS
TheCity’sStrategicPlanhasfivemajorgoals:OperationalExcellence,EconomicVitality,Healthy
Community,StrongandSecureNeighborhoodsandaConnectedCommunity.Thereclassifications
andproposednewclassificationssupporttheCity-widestrategicgoalofOperationalExcellenceby
providingmoreaccuratepositiontitlesthatbetterreflecttheneedsoftheCity’sworkforce.
Furthermore,approvaloftherevisedFiscalYear2015-2016CompensationScheduleanditsposting
ontheCity'sinternetwebsitesupportsthegoalofOperationalExcellenceasitenhancesdisclosure
andtransparencyofemployeecompensationand,asaresult,fosterspublictrustthroughanopen
and ethical government.
CURRENT YEAR FISCAL IMPACT
TherearefiscalimpactsassociatedwiththeFAIVDC-LECCExecutiveDirector,FAFinancial
ManagerandFASeniorFinancialAnalyst,resultinginanappropriationof$36,965tothepersonnel
categoryofthePoliceGrantFund.ThesepersonnelcostsarefullyreimbursedbyHighIntensity
DrugTraffickingArea(HIDTA)grantfunds.TheCityreceivesa4%administrativefeeforactingas
thefiscalintermediaryforthesepositions.Becauseofthe4%administrativefee,thereisapositive
impact of $1,479 to the General Fund in the current fiscal year.
Fortheotherpositions,theresultingcostincreasesinthefiscalyear2015-16budgetwillbeoffsetby
salarysavingsfromvacantpositionsandworkfurloughsavingsthatareprojectedintherespective
departments.
ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT
Theongoingsalarycostsassociatedwiththesepositionswillbeincorporatedintothebaselinesalary
budgets of the respective departments.
ATTACHMENTS
Revised Fiscal Year 2015-2016 Compensation Schedule
StaffContact:CourtneyBarrett(HumanResourcesDepartment)andGlenGoogins(CityAttorney's
Office)
City of Chula VistaPage 4 of 4Printed on 7/16/2015
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 181
FiscalYear20152016CompensationSchedule
EffectiveJune26,2015
HourlyRateBiWeeklyRate
POSITIONTITLEPCNBARGStepAStepBStepCStepDStepEStepAStepBStepCStepDStepE
ACCOUNTANT3633CONF$31.30$32.86$34.51$36.23$38.04$2,503.77$2,628.96$2,760.40$2,898.42$3,043.35
ACCOUNTINGASSISTANT3641CVEA$19.14$20.10$21.11$22.16$23.27$1,531.49$1,608.07$1,688.47$1,772.90$1,861.54
ACCOUNTINGASSISTANT(HRLY)3640UCHR$19.14$20.10$21.11$22.16$23.27$1,531.50$1,608.07$1,688.48$1,772.89$1,861.54
ACCOUNTINGTECH(HOURLY)3676UCHR$24.22$25.43$26.70$28.03$29.44$1,937.34$2,034.21$2,135.91$2,242.71$2,354.85
ACCOUNTINGTECHNICIAN3643CONF$24.22$25.43$26.70$28.03$29.44$1,937.34$2,034.21$2,135.92$2,242.72$2,354.85
ACCOUNTINGTECHNICIAN3675CVEA$24.22$25.43$26.70$28.03$29.44$1,937.34$2,034.21$2,135.92$2,242.71$2,354.85
ACCOUNTSPAYABLESUPERVISOR3645CVEA$27.85$29.24$30.70$32.24$33.85$2,227.94$2,339.34$2,456.31$2,579.12$2,708.08
ADMINAIDE0201CVEA$16.11$16.92$17.76$18.65$19.58$1,288.99$1,353.44$1,421.12$1,492.17$1,566.78
ADMINANALYSTI0203CVEA$26.60$27.93$29.33$30.79$32.33$2,127.90$2,234.28$2,346.00$2,463.30$2,586.47
ADMINSERVICESMANAGER0215SM$43.29$52.61$3,462.91$4,209.18
ADMINISTRATIVESECRETARY0149CONF$23.66$24.84$26.08$27.39$28.76$1,892.59$1,987.22$2,086.58$2,190.91$2,300.45
ADMINISTRATIVESECRETARY0179CVEA$23.66$24.84$26.08$27.39$28.76$1,892.59$1,987.22$2,086.58$2,190.91$2,300.45
ADMINISTRATIVESECRETARY(MAYOR,ATWILL)0154CONF$23.66$24.84$26.08$27.39$28.76$1,892.59$1,987.22$2,086.58$2,190.91$2,300.45
ADMINISTRATIVETECH(HOURLY)0127UCHR$23.66$24.84$26.08$27.39$28.76$1,892.59$1,987.22$2,086.58$2,190.91$2,300.45
ADMINISTRATIVETECHNICIAN0147CONF$23.66$24.84$26.08$27.39$28.76$1,892.59$1,987.22$2,086.58$2,190.91$2,300.45
ADMINISTRATIVETECHNICIAN0181CVEA$23.66$24.84$26.08$27.39$28.76$1,892.59$1,987.22$2,086.58$2,190.91$2,300.45
ANIMALADOPTIONCOUNSELOR5310CVEA$20.47$21.49$22.57$23.70$24.88$1,637.70$1,719.58$1,805.56$1,895.84$1,990.63
ANIMALCAREAIDE(HRLY)5316UCHR$11.32$11.91$12.55$13.20$13.90$905.56$953.01$1,003.78$1,056.21$1,111.98
ANIMALCAREFACADMINISTRATOR5327SM$50.43$52.96$55.60$58.38$61.30$4,034.80$4,236.54$4,448.36$4,670.79$4,904.33
ANIMALCAREFACILITYMANAGER5330MM$43.15$45.30$47.57$49.95$52.44$3,451.72$3,624.31$3,805.53$3,995.80$4,195.59
ANIMALCAREFACILITYSUPVR5317MM$34.01$35.71$37.50$39.37$41.34$2,720.73$2,856.76$2,999.60$3,149.58$3,307.06
ANIMALCARESPECIALIST5343CVEA$17.17$18.02$18.93$19.87$20.86$1,373.23$1,441.90$1,514.00$1,589.69$1,669.18
ANIMALCARESPECIALIST(HRLY)5344UCHR$17.17$18.02$18.92$19.87$20.86$1,373.24$1,441.90$1,513.99$1,589.69$1,669.18
ANIMALCARESUPERVISOR5319CVEA$23.84$25.03$26.28$27.59$28.97$1,906.90$2,002.25$2,102.35$2,207.48$2,317.85
ANIMALCONTROLOFFICER5303CVEA$20.60$21.63$22.71$23.85$25.04$1,647.88$1,730.28$1,816.79$1,907.63$2,003.01
ANIMALCONTROLOFFICER(HRLY)5305UCHR$20.60$21.63$22.71$23.85$25.04$1,647.88$1,730.27$1,816.79$1,907.63$2,003.01
ANIMALCTRLOFFCRSUPERVISOR5304CVEA$23.69$24.87$26.12$27.42$28.79$1,895.05$1,989.82$2,089.30$2,193.77$2,303.46
ANIMALSERVICESSPECIALIST5309CVEA$18.73$19.66$20.65$21.68$22.76$1,498.07$1,572.98$1,651.63$1,734.21$1,820.92
APPLICATIONSSUPPSPECHRLY3078UCHR$32.53$34.16$35.87$37.66$39.54$2,602.54$2,732.67$2,869.29$3,012.76$3,163.40
APPLICATIONSSUPPORTMANAGER3083MM$39.76$41.75$43.84$46.03$48.33$3,180.88$3,339.92$3,506.92$3,682.26$3,866.38
APPLICATIONSSUPPORTSPEC3088PROF$32.53$34.16$35.87$37.66$39.54$2,602.54$2,732.67$2,869.30$3,012.76$3,163.40
AQUARIST7741CVEA$21.32$22.39$23.51$24.68$25.92$1,705.79$1,791.08$1,880.64$1,974.67$2,073.40
AQUATICSUPERVISORI7579CVEA$21.87$22.96$24.11$25.31$26.58$1,749.43$1,836.89$1,928.74$2,025.18$2,126.44
AQUATICSUPERVISORII7577CVEA$24.05$25.26$26.52$27.85$29.24$1,924.37$2,020.58$2,121.61$2,227.70$2,339.08
AQUATICSUPERVISORIII7575CVEA$27.66$29.05$30.50$32.02$33.62$2,213.02$2,323.67$2,439.87$2,561.86$2,689.95
ASSISTANTCITYCLERK2210SM$36.58$38.41$40.33$42.35$44.47$2,926.55$3,072.87$3,226.52$3,387.83$3,557.23
ASSISTANTDIROFDEVSERVICES4040SM$63.78$77.53$5,102.42$6,202.02
ASSOCACCOUNTANT3635CONF$34.43$36.15$37.96$39.85$41.85$2,754.13$2,891.84$3,036.43$3,188.25$3,347.67
ASSOCENGINEER6017WCE$37.69$39.58$41.56$43.63$45.82$3,015.46$3,166.24$3,324.54$3,490.77$3,665.31
ASSOCLANDSURVEYOR6287WCE$37.69$39.58$41.56$43.63$45.82$3,015.46$3,166.23$3,324.54$3,490.77$3,665.31
ASSOCPLANCHECKENGINEER4747WCE$37.69$39.58$41.56$43.63$45.82$3,015.46$3,166.23$3,324.54$3,490.77$3,665.31
ASSOCPLANNER4437CVEA$31.03$32.58$34.21$35.92$37.72$2,482.54$2,606.66$2,737.00$2,873.85$3,017.54
ASSOCPLANNER(HOURLY)4438UCHR$31.03$32.58$34.21$35.92$37.72$2,482.53$2,606.66$2,736.99$2,873.85$3,017.54
ASSTCHIEFOFPOLICE5011SM$62.57$76.05$5,005.27$6,083.93
ASSTCITYATTORNEY2405SM$66.80$70.14$73.65$77.29$81.20$5,344.14$5,611.36$5,891.93$6,183.24$6,495.85
ASSTCITYMANAGER/ADMIN2707EXEC$86.43$104.40$6,914.40$8,352.23
ASSTDIRHUMANRESOURCES3304SM$58.19$69.83$4,655.19$5,586.23
ASSTDIROFFINANCE3604SM$57.84$69.83$4,627.06$5,586.23
ASSTDIROFPUBLICWORKS6322SM$57.84$69.83$4,627.06$5,586.23
ASSTDIROFRECREATION7401SM$47.78$58.07$3,822.24$4,645.97
ASSTDIRECTOROFENGINEERING6008SM$57.84$69.83$4,627.06$5,586.23
ASSTENGINEER6015WCE$32.78$34.42$36.14$37.94$39.84$2,622.13$2,753.25$2,890.90$3,035.46$3,187.22
ASSTLANDSURVEYOR6289WCE$32.78$34.42$36.14$37.94$39.84$2,622.14$2,753.24$2,890.91$3,035.45$3,187.22
ASSTPLANCHECKENGINEER4749WCE$32.78$34.42$36.14$37.94$39.84$2,622.14$2,753.24$2,890.91$3,035.45$3,187.22
ASSTPLANNER4439CVEA$28.21$29.62$31.10$32.66$34.29$2,256.85$2,369.69$2,488.18$2,612.59$2,743.22
AUTOMATEDFINGERPRINTTECH5123CVEA$18.73$19.66$20.65$21.68$22.76$1,498.08$1,572.98$1,651.62$1,734.20$1,820.92
BENEFITSMANAGER3404MMCF$39.32$41.29$43.35$45.52$47.80$3,145.81$3,303.10$3,468.26$3,641.67$3,823.76
BENEFITSTECHNICIANHOURLY3400UCHR$22.39$23.51$24.69$25.92$27.22$1,791.39$1,880.96$1,975.01$2,073.76$2,177.44
BLDGPROJECTMANAGER6412PROF$36.54$38.37$40.29$42.30$44.42$2,923.26$3,069.43$3,222.90$3,384.04$3,553.25
BLDGPROJECTSSUPERVISOR6404PROF$33.23$34.89$36.63$38.47$40.39$2,658.21$2,791.12$2,930.68$3,077.21$3,231.07
BUDGET&ANALYSISMANAGER2222SM$54.15$65.35$4,332.14$5,227.74
BUILDINGINSPECTIONMANAGER4769MM$39.74$41.73$43.81$46.00$48.31$3,179.25$3,338.21$3,505.12$3,680.38$3,864.40
BUILDINGINSPECTORI4771CVEA$27.32$28.68$30.12$31.61$33.21$2,185.42$2,294.69$2,409.43$2,528.74$2,656.40
BUILDINGINSPECTORII4773CVEA$30.05$31.55$33.13$34.79$36.53$2,403.97$2,524.17$2,650.38$2,782.90$2,922.05
BUILDINGINSPECTORIIHRLY4774UCHR$30.05$31.55$33.13$34.79$36.53$2,403.97$2,524.18$2,650.39$2,782.90$2,922.05
AllpositiontitlesdesignatedasExecutiveΛͻ99/ͼΜorSeniorManagementΛͻ{aͼΜhavesalarybandswithaminimumΛͻ{ƷĻƦ!ͼΜandmaximumΛͻ{ƷĻƦ9ͼΜsalary;salaryappointmentsand
subsequentadjustmentswithintheapprovedsalaryrangemaybemadebytheƦƚƭźƷźƚƓƭappointingauthority.
Approvedandadopted:
ResolutionNo.:
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 182
FiscalYear20152016CompensationSchedule
EffectiveJune26,2015
HourlyRateBiWeeklyRate
POSITIONTITLEPCNBARGStepAStepBStepCStepDStepEStepAStepBStepCStepDStepE
BUILDINGINSPECTORIII4775CVEA$33.05$34.71$36.44$38.26$40.18$2,644.37$2,776.59$2,915.42$3,061.19$3,214.25
BUILDINGOFFICIAL/CODEENFMGR4780SM$60.74$73.83$4,859.44$5,906.68
BUILDINGPROJECTCOORDINATOR6407CVEA$30.05$31.55$33.13$34.79$36.53$2,403.97$2,524.17$2,650.38$2,782.90$2,922.05
BUSINESSLICENSEREP4505CVEA$19.14$20.10$21.11$22.16$23.27$1,531.49$1,608.07$1,688.47$1,772.90$1,861.54
CARPENTER6444CVEA$23.84$25.03$26.28$27.60$28.98$1,907.05$2,002.41$2,102.53$2,207.65$2,318.03
CBAGDEPUTYDIRECTORSDLECC5269SM$44.64$51.68$54.26$3,571.23$4,134.14$4,340.85
CBAGDEPUTYEXECUTIVEDIRECTOR5273SM$47.15$59.04$3,771.68$4,723.43
CBAGEXECUTIVEDIRECTOR5272EXEC$55.46$61.14$69.45$4,436.62$4,891.37$5,556.15
CBAGPROGRAMMANAGER5285MM$44.20$46.41$48.73$51.17$53.72$3,535.87$3,712.66$3,898.29$4,093.21$4,297.87
CHIEFOFPOLICE5001EXEC$80.96$96.36$98.40$6,476.46$7,708.86$7,872.19
CHIEFOFSTAFF2011MMUC$29.26$30.72$32.26$33.87$35.56$2,340.68$2,457.72$2,580.60$2,709.63$2,845.12
CIPPROJECTSSUPV6405MM$25.30$26.56$27.89$29.28$30.75$2,023.61$2,124.79$2,231.03$2,342.58$2,459.71
CITYATTORNEY(ELECTED)2400CATY$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$88.75$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$7,100.39
CITYCLERK2201CCLK$69.36$5,549.04
CITYENGINEER6010SM$58.25$70.80$4,660.10$5,664.37
CITYMANAGER2710CMGR$115.21$9,217.09
CIVILBCKGRNDINVEST(HOURLY)5430UCHR$22.66$23.79$24.98$26.23$27.54$1,812.67$1,903.30$1,998.46$2,098.38$2,203.31
CIVILIANBACKGROUNDINVEST5429CVEA$22.66$23.79$24.98$26.23$27.54$1,812.67$1,903.30$1,998.46$2,098.38$2,203.30
CIVILIANPOLICEINVESTIGATOR5431UCHR$25.79$27.08$28.43$29.85$31.35$2,063.15$2,166.32$2,274.63$2,388.36$2,507.78
CLERICALAIDE0241UCHR$10.55$11.07$11.63$12.21$12.82$843.66$885.84$930.14$976.64$1,025.47
CODEENFOFFICERI4777CVEA$23.73$24.91$26.16$27.47$28.84$1,898.28$1,993.19$2,092.86$2,197.50$2,307.38
CODEENFOFFICERI(HOURLY)4776UCHR$23.73$24.91$26.16$27.47$28.84$1,898.29$1,993.19$2,092.86$2,197.50$2,307.38
CODEENFOFFICERII4779CVEA$26.10$27.41$28.78$30.22$31.73$2,088.11$2,192.52$2,302.14$2,417.25$2,538.11
CODEENFOFFICERII(HOURLY)4778UCHR$26.10$27.41$28.78$30.22$31.73$2,088.11$2,192.51$2,302.15$2,417.25$2,538.11
CODEENFORCEMENTTECHNICIAN4789CVEA$20.63$21.67$22.75$23.89$25.08$1,650.68$1,733.22$1,819.88$1,910.87$2,006.41
COLLECTIONSSUPERVISOR3683MM$32.99$34.64$36.37$38.19$40.10$2,639.43$2,771.41$2,909.98$3,055.48$3,208.25
COLLECTIONSSUPERVISORHOURLY3687UCHR$32.99$34.64$36.37$38.19$40.10$2,639.43$2,771.41$2,909.98$3,055.48$3,208.25
COMMUNICATIONSYSTEMMGR5161MM$29.73$31.21$32.77$34.41$36.13$2,378.22$2,497.13$2,621.99$2,753.09$2,890.74
COMMUNITYSERVOFFICER5141CVEA$18.73$19.66$20.65$21.68$22.76$1,498.07$1,572.98$1,651.63$1,734.21$1,820.92
COMPUTERPROG/ANALYST3021CVEA$31.07$32.62$34.25$35.97$37.76$2,485.44$2,609.71$2,740.19$2,877.20$3,021.06
COMPUTERPROGRAMMER3023CVEA$28.24$29.66$31.14$32.70$34.33$2,259.49$2,372.46$2,491.09$2,615.64$2,746.42
CONSERVATIONSPECIALISTI6200CVEA$21.57$22.65$23.78$24.97$26.22$1,725.70$1,811.99$1,902.59$1,997.73$2,097.61
CONSTITUENTSERVICESMANAGER2038PRUC$26.89$28.24$29.65$31.13$32.69$2,151.42$2,258.99$2,371.93$2,490.53$2,615.06
CONSTRUCTION&REPAIRMGR6423MM$37.46$39.33$41.30$43.36$45.53$2,996.62$3,146.46$3,303.78$3,468.97$3,642.42
CONSTRUCTION&REPAIRSUPVSR6427CVEA$33.10$34.76$36.50$38.32$40.24$2,648.18$2,780.59$2,919.62$3,065.60$3,218.88
COUNCILASSISTANT2023UCHR$22.91$24.06$25.26$26.52$27.85$1,832.86$1,924.50$2,020.73$2,121.76$2,227.85
COUNCILPERSON2003CL$23.43$1,874.50
CRIMELABORATORYMANAGER5101MM$42.72$44.86$47.10$49.46$51.93$3,417.88$3,588.78$3,768.22$3,956.63$4,154.46
CULTURALARTSPROGRAMMANAGER4435PROF$35.81$37.60$39.48$41.45$43.52$2,864.46$3,007.68$3,158.07$3,315.97$3,481.77
CUSTODIAL&FACMANAGER6654MM$37.46$39.33$41.30$43.36$45.53$2,996.62$3,146.46$3,303.78$3,468.97$3,642.42
CUSTODIALSUPERVISOR6667CVEA$21.90$23.00$24.15$25.35$26.62$1,752.09$1,839.69$1,931.68$2,028.26$2,129.68
CUSTODIAN6661CVEA$17.31$18.18$19.09$20.04$21.04$1,385.05$1,454.30$1,527.01$1,603.36$1,683.53
CUSTODIAN(HOURLY)6662UCHR$17.31$18.18$19.09$20.04$21.04$1,385.04$1,454.30$1,527.01$1,603.36$1,683.53
DELIVERYDRIVER7191CVEA$15.87$16.66$17.50$18.37$19.29$1,269.63$1,333.11$1,399.77$1,469.75$1,543.24
DELIVERYDRIVER(HOURLY)7192UCHR$15.87$16.66$17.50$18.37$19.29$1,269.63$1,333.11$1,399.76$1,469.76$1,543.24
DEPCITYMANAGER2705EXEC$89.40$98.56$7,151.93$7,885.00
DEPUTYCITYATTORNEYI2410PRUC$38.66$40.59$42.62$44.75$46.99$3,092.81$3,247.46$3,409.83$3,580.32$3,759.34
DEPUTYCITYATTORNEYII2408PRUC$46.39$48.71$51.15$53.70$56.39$3,711.37$3,896.94$4,091.79$4,296.38$4,511.20
DEPUTYCITYATTYIII2411SM$60.13$63.14$66.30$69.61$73.09$4,810.72$5,051.25$5,303.82$5,569.01$5,847.43
DEPUTYCITYCLERKI2245PRUC$24.45$25.67$26.95$28.30$29.72$1,955.83$2,053.62$2,156.30$2,264.11$2,377.32
DEPUTYCITYCLERKII2243PRUC$26.89$28.24$29.65$31.13$32.69$2,151.41$2,258.98$2,371.93$2,490.53$2,615.06
DEPUTYFIRECHIEF5505SM$60.12$73.08$4,809.73$5,846.25
DEPUTYFIRECHIEF(INTERIM)5504SM$60.12$73.08$4,809.73$5,846.25
DETENTIONFACILITYMANAGER5130MM$42.72$44.86$47.10$49.46$51.93$3,417.88$3,588.78$3,768.22$3,956.63$4,154.46
DEVELOPMENTSERVICESTECHI4542CVEA$19.52$20.49$21.52$22.59$23.72$1,561.43$1,639.50$1,721.48$1,807.55$1,897.93
DEVELOPMENTSVCSDEPTDIR4039EXEC$74.64$89.29$90.74$5,971.16$7,143.45$7,258.95
DEVELOPMENTSVCSTECHII4541CVEA$21.47$22.54$23.67$24.85$26.10$1,717.58$1,803.45$1,893.63$1,988.31$2,087.72
DEVELOPMENTSVCSTECHIII4543CVEA$24.69$25.92$27.22$28.58$30.01$1,975.21$2,073.97$2,177.67$2,286.55$2,400.88
DEVLPMENTSVCSTECHII(HRLY)4544UCHR$21.47$22.54$23.67$24.85$26.10$1,717.57$1,803.46$1,893.63$1,988.31$2,087.72
DEVLPMTSVCSCOUNTERMGR4547MM$35.69$37.48$39.35$41.32$43.38$2,855.35$2,998.12$3,148.02$3,305.42$3,470.70
DIROFECONDEVELOPMENT2734EXEC$69.83$84.23$5,586.63$6,738.33
DIROFENG/CITYENGINEER6006EXEC$66.14$80.39$5,291.24$6,431.53
DIROFFINANCE3601EXEC$75.18$90.72$6,014.15$7,257.98
DIROFHUMANRESOURCES3303EXEC$65.24$79.30$5,219.04$6,343.78
DIROFINFOTECHSVCS3001EXEC$65.24$71.93$79.30$5,219.04$5,754.00$6,343.78
DIROFLIBRARY7002EXEC$69.83$84.23$5,586.63$6,738.33
DIROFPUBLICWORKS6320EXEC$73.98$87.22$90.72$5,918.63$6,977.74$7,257.98
DIROFRECREATION7405EXEC$60.32$63.34$66.50$69.83$73.32$4,825.59$5,066.87$5,320.21$5,586.22$5,865.53
DIROFREDEVLPMENT&HOUSING4201EXEC$66.14$80.39$5,291.24$6,431.53
ELECTRICIAN6438CVEA$25.03$26.28$27.60$28.98$30.42$2,002.41$2,102.53$2,207.66$2,318.04$2,433.95
ELECTRONIC/EQUIPINSTALLER6492CVEA$22.75$23.89$25.09$26.34$27.66$1,820.37$1,911.39$2,006.96$2,107.31$2,212.67
ELECTRONICSTECHSUPERVISOR6472CVEA$31.66$33.25$34.91$36.65$38.49$2,533.10$2,659.75$2,792.74$2,932.38$3,079.00
Approvedandadopted:
ResolutionNo.:
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 183
FiscalYear20152016CompensationSchedule
EffectiveJune26,2015
HourlyRateBiWeeklyRate
POSITIONTITLEPCNBARGStepAStepBStepCStepDStepEStepAStepBStepCStepDStepE
ELECTRONICSTECHNICIAN6475CVEA$27.53$28.91$30.36$31.87$33.47$2,202.69$2,312.83$2,428.47$2,549.89$2,677.39
EMERGENCYSRVCSCOORD(HRLY)5565UCHR$35.60$37.38$39.25$41.21$43.27$2,848.15$2,990.55$3,140.08$3,297.08$3,461.94
EMERGENCYSVCSCOORDINATOR5564PROF$35.60$37.38$39.25$41.21$43.27$2,848.15$2,990.55$3,140.08$3,297.08$3,461.94
EMSNURSECOORDINATOR5567PROF$45.03$47.28$49.65$52.13$54.74$3,602.57$3,782.69$3,971.83$4,170.42$4,378.94
ENGINEERINGTECHI6081CVEA$23.75$24.94$26.19$27.50$28.87$1,900.37$1,995.39$2,095.16$2,199.92$2,309.91
ENGINEERINGTECHII6071CVEA$26.13$27.44$28.81$30.25$31.76$2,090.41$2,194.93$2,304.68$2,419.91$2,540.91
ENVIRONMENTALHLTHSPECIALIST6129CVEA$31.42$32.99$34.64$36.37$38.19$2,513.25$2,638.91$2,770.86$2,909.40$3,054.87
ENVIRONMENTALRESOURCESPEC4464CVEA$31.42$32.99$34.64$36.37$38.19$2,513.25$2,638.91$2,770.86$2,909.40$3,054.87
ENVIRONMENTALSERVICESMANAGER6205MM$42.97$45.12$47.37$49.74$52.23$3,437.36$3,609.23$3,789.69$3,979.17$4,178.13
ENVIRONMENTALSUSTAINABILITYMANAGER6207MM$42.97$45.12$47.37$49.74$52.23$3,437.36$3,609.23$3,789.69$3,979.17$4,178.13
EQUIPMENTMAINTENANCEMANAGER6505MM$35.26$37.03$38.88$40.82$42.86$2,820.97$2,962.02$3,110.11$3,265.62$3,428.90
EQUIPMENTMECHANIC6542CVEA$23.62$24.80$26.04$27.34$28.71$1,889.57$1,984.05$2,083.25$2,187.41$2,296.78
EQUIPMENTOPERATOR6361CVEA$25.14$26.40$27.72$29.10$30.56$2,011.09$2,111.64$2,217.22$2,328.09$2,444.49
EVIDENCECONTROLASST(HRLY)5117UCHR$18.73$19.66$20.65$21.68$22.76$1,498.08$1,572.98$1,651.63$1,734.21$1,820.92
EXECUTIVESECRETARY0187CONF$28.63$30.06$31.56$33.14$34.79$2,290.03$2,404.53$2,524.76$2,651.00$2,783.55
EXECUTIVESECRETARY(HOURLY)0188UCHR$28.63$30.06$31.56$33.14$34.79$2,290.03$2,404.53$2,524.76$2,650.99$2,783.55
FAACCOUNTINGTECHNICIAN5270CONF$24.22$25.43$26.70$28.03$29.44$1,937.35$2,034.21$2,135.92$2,242.72$2,354.85
FAADMINANALYSTI5297CONF$26.60$27.93$29.33$30.79$32.33$2,127.90$2,234.28$2,346.00$2,463.30$2,586.48
FAADMINANALYSTII5296CONF$29.26$30.72$32.26$33.87$35.56$2,340.68$2,457.73$2,580.60$2,709.63$2,845.12
FAANALYST5277CONF$20.33$21.34$22.41$23.53$24.71$1,626.07$1,707.38$1,792.75$1,882.38$1,976.50
FADIRECTOROFSDLECC5274SM$57.88$69.45$4,630.12$5,556.14
FAEXECUTIVEASSISTANT5286CONF$26.04$27.34$28.71$30.15$31.65$2,083.29$2,187.45$2,296.83$2,411.67$2,532.25
FAGEOSPATIALINTELANALYST5439PRUC$37.89$39.78$41.77$43.86$46.06$3,031.15$3,182.73$3,341.86$3,508.95$3,684.40
FAGRAPHICDESIGNER/WBMSTR5289CONF$27.51$28.89$30.33$31.85$33.44$2,201.15$2,311.21$2,426.60$2,548.11$2,675.51
FAINFOSECURITYPROGRAMMGR5453MMUC$44.20$46.41$48.73$51.17$53.72$3,535.87$3,712.66$3,898.29$4,093.21$4,297.87
FAINTELLIGENCEANALYST5485CONF$27.51$28.89$30.33$31.85$33.44$2,201.15$2,311.21$2,426.60$2,548.11$2,675.51
FAIVDCLECCEXECUTIVEDIRECTOR5491SM$48.55$50.98$53.53$56.20$59.01$3,883.95$4,078.14$4,282.05$4,496.15$4,720.96
FAFINANCIALMANAGER5493MMUC$43.66$45.84$48.13$50.54$53.06$3,492.45$3,667.07$3,850.42$4,042.94$4,245.09
FALECCITMANAGER5440MMUC$40.42$42.44$44.56$46.79$49.13$3,233.24$3,394.91$3,564.65$3,742.88$3,930.03
FAMANAGEMENTASSISTANT5278CONF$24.80$26.04$27.34$28.71$30.15$1,984.09$2,083.30$2,187.46$2,296.83$2,411.68
FAMICROCOMPUTERSPECIALIST5443PRUC$32.86$34.50$36.23$38.04$39.94$2,628.82$2,760.27$2,898.28$3,043.19$3,195.35
FANTWRKADMINISTRATORI5292PRUC$33.07$34.72$36.46$38.28$40.20$2,645.62$2,777.90$2,916.79$3,062.63$3,215.77
FANTWRKADMINISTRATORII5294PRUC$36.38$38.20$40.11$42.11$44.22$2,910.18$3,055.68$3,208.47$3,368.90$3,537.34
FAPROGRAMANALYST5444PRUC$39.20$41.16$43.22$45.38$47.65$3,136.28$3,293.09$3,457.75$3,630.63$3,812.17
FAPROGRAMASSISTANT5451CONF$19.81$20.80$21.84$22.93$24.08$1,584.92$1,664.16$1,747.37$1,834.74$1,926.48
FAPROGRAMMANAGER5445SM$44.64$46.87$49.22$51.68$54.26$3,571.23$3,749.79$3,937.27$4,134.14$4,340.85
FARCFLNETWRKENGINEER5284CONF$31.93$33.53$35.20$36.96$38.81$2,554.36$2,682.08$2,816.19$2,957.00$3,104.85
FASRINTELLIGENCEANALYST5483PRUC$32.35$33.97$35.67$37.45$39.33$2,588.25$2,717.65$2,853.54$2,996.22$3,146.02
FASRFINANCIALANALYST5495PRUC$30.72$32.26$33.87$35.56$37.34$2,457.72$2,580.61$2,709.64$2,845.12$2,987.38
FASRSECRETARY5477CONF$20.38$21.40$22.47$23.59$24.77$1,630.43$1,711.96$1,797.56$1,887.43$1,981.80
FASUPERVISORYINTELLIGENCEANALYST5481PRUC$35.59$37.37$39.24$41.20$43.26$2,847.06$2,989.41$3,138.88$3,295.83$3,460.62
FACILITIESMANAGER6425MM$40.16$42.17$44.28$46.49$48.82$3,213.04$3,373.69$3,542.38$3,719.50$3,905.47
FACILITY&SUPPLYSPECIALIST5648CVEA$20.35$21.37$22.44$23.56$24.74$1,628.20$1,709.61$1,795.09$1,884.85$1,979.09
FACILITY&SUPPLYSPEC(HRLY)5646UCHR$20.35$21.37$22.44$23.56$24.74$1,628.20$1,709.61$1,795.09$1,884.84$1,979.09
FAMILY&YOUTHLITERACYCOORD7035CVEA$24.05$25.26$26.52$27.85$29.24$1,924.37$2,020.58$2,121.61$2,227.69$2,339.08
FIELDMAINTENANCESPECIALIST7471CVEA$18.50$19.43$20.40$21.42$22.49$1,480.18$1,554.20$1,631.90$1,713.50$1,799.18
FINANCE&PURCHASINGMGR3625SM$53.76$65.35$4,300.87$5,227.74
FIREAPPARATUSMECH6521CVEA$28.33$29.75$31.23$32.79$34.43$2,266.30$2,379.62$2,498.60$2,623.53$2,754.71
FIREBATTALIONCHIEF(112HR)5511IAFF$34.55$36.27$38.09$39.99$41.99$3,869.24$4,062.70$4,265.84$4,479.13$4,703.09
FIREBATTALIONCHIEF(80HR)5513IAFF$48.37$50.78$53.32$55.99$58.79$3,869.24$4,062.70$4,265.84$4,479.13$4,703.09
FIREBATTALIONCHIEF(INTERIM)5540IAFF$34.55$36.27$38.09$39.99$41.99$3,869.24$4,062.70$4,265.84$4,479.13$4,703.09
FIRECAPTAIN(112HR)5583IAFF$27.73$29.12$30.57$32.10$33.71$3,105.90$3,261.20$3,424.26$3,595.47$3,775.24
FIRECAPTAIN(80HR)5581IAFF$38.82$40.76$42.80$44.94$47.19$3,105.90$3,261.20$3,424.26$3,595.47$3,775.24
FIRECAPTAIN(INTERIM)5580IAFF$27.73$29.12$30.57$32.10$33.71$3,105.91$3,261.21$3,424.27$3,595.48$3,775.25
FIRECHIEF5501EXEC$72.15$85.52$87.69$5,771.67$6,841.39$7,015.51
FIREDIVISIONCHIEF5507MMUC$54.27$56.99$59.84$62.83$65.97$4,341.96$4,559.06$4,787.01$5,026.37$5,277.68
FIREENG(112HR)5603IAFF$23.64$24.83$26.07$27.37$28.74$2,648.16$2,780.57$2,919.60$3,065.58$3,218.85
FIREENG(80HR)5601IAFF$33.10$34.76$36.49$38.32$40.24$2,648.16$2,780.57$2,919.60$3,065.58$3,218.85
FIREENGINEER(INTERIM)5602IAFF$23.64$24.83$26.07$27.37$28.74$2,648.17$2,780.58$2,919.61$3,065.59$3,218.87
FIREINSP/INVESTI5530IAFF$28.00$29.40$30.86$32.41$34.03$2,239.62$2,351.61$2,469.19$2,592.65$2,722.28
FIREINSP/INVESTI(HRLY)5534UCHR$28.00$29.40$30.86$32.41$34.03$2,239.62$2,351.61$2,469.19$2,592.65$2,722.28
FIREINSP/INVESTII5531IAFF$30.79$32.33$33.95$35.65$37.43$2,463.58$2,586.76$2,716.10$2,851.90$2,994.50
FIREINSP/INVESTIIHRLY5532UCHR$30.79$32.33$33.95$35.65$37.43$2,463.58$2,586.76$2,716.10$2,851.90$2,994.50
FIREPREVENG/INVEST5528IAFF$37.14$39.00$40.95$43.00$45.15$2,971.38$3,119.95$3,275.94$3,439.74$3,611.73
FIREPREVENTIONAIDE5535CVEA$13.43$14.10$14.80$15.54$16.32$1,074.12$1,127.82$1,184.22$1,243.43$1,305.60
FIREPREVENTIONAIDE5533UCHR$13.43$14.10$14.80$15.54$16.32$1,074.12$1,127.82$1,184.22$1,243.43$1,305.60
FIREFIGHTER(112HR)5623IAFF$20.10$21.10$22.15$23.26$24.43$2,250.66$2,363.19$2,481.35$2,605.42$2,735.69
FIREFIGHTER(80HR)5621IAFF$28.13$29.54$31.02$32.57$34.20$2,250.66$2,363.19$2,481.35$2,605.42$2,735.69
FIREFIGHTER/PARAMEDIC(112HR)5613IAFF$23.11$24.26$25.48$26.75$28.09$2,588.26$2,717.67$2,853.56$2,996.24$3,146.05
FIREFIGHTER/PARAMEDIC(80HR)5611IAFF$32.35$33.97$35.67$37.45$39.33$2,588.26$2,717.67$2,853.56$2,996.24$3,146.05
FISCAL&MANAGEMENTANALYST0216PRCF$40.49$42.51$44.64$46.87$49.21$3,238.94$3,400.89$3,570.93$3,749.47$3,936.95
FISCAL&MGTANALYST(HOURL)0218UCHR$40.49$42.51$44.64$46.87$49.21$3,238.94$3,400.89$3,570.93$3,749.47$3,936.94
Approvedandadopted:
ResolutionNo.:
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 184
FiscalYear20152016CompensationSchedule
EffectiveJune26,2015
HourlyRateBiWeeklyRate
POSITIONTITLEPCNBARGStepAStepBStepCStepDStepEStepAStepBStepCStepDStepE
FISCALOFFICESPEC(HOURLY)0170UCHR$17.69$18.57$19.50$20.47$21.50$1,414.84$1,485.58$1,559.86$1,637.85$1,719.74
FISCALOFFICESPECIALIST0169CVEA$17.69$18.57$19.50$20.47$21.50$1,414.84$1,485.58$1,559.86$1,637.85$1,719.74
FISCALSERVICESANALYST3610PROF$40.09$42.09$44.20$46.41$48.73$3,207.18$3,367.54$3,535.92$3,712.72$3,898.35
FLEETINVENTORYCONTROLSPEC6513CVEA$23.41$24.58$25.80$27.09$28.45$1,872.43$1,966.05$2,064.35$2,167.57$2,275.95
FLEETMANAGER6501MM$39.17$41.13$43.19$45.35$47.61$3,133.79$3,290.48$3,455.00$3,627.75$3,809.14
FORENSICSSPECIALIST5114CVEA$28.05$29.45$30.92$32.47$34.09$2,243.72$2,355.91$2,473.70$2,597.39$2,727.26
GARDENER(SEASONAL)6629UCHR$17.31$18.18$19.09$20.04$21.04$1,385.04$1,454.30$1,527.01$1,603.36$1,683.53
GARDENERI6627CVEA$17.31$18.18$19.09$20.04$21.04$1,385.05$1,454.30$1,527.01$1,603.36$1,683.53
GARDENERII6623CVEA$19.04$20.00$21.00$22.05$23.15$1,523.56$1,599.73$1,679.72$1,763.71$1,851.89
GISMANAGER3079MM$40.15$42.16$44.27$46.48$48.81$3,212.37$3,373.00$3,541.64$3,718.73$3,904.66
GISSPECIALIST3081CVEA$28.24$29.66$31.14$32.70$34.33$2,259.49$2,372.46$2,491.09$2,615.64$2,746.42
GISSPECIALIST(HOURLY)3092UCHR$28.24$29.66$31.14$32.70$34.33$2,259.49$2,372.47$2,491.09$2,615.64$2,746.42
GRAFFITIABATEMENTCOORDINATOR6339CVEA$28.74$30.18$31.69$33.27$34.94$2,299.45$2,414.43$2,535.15$2,661.90$2,795.00
GRAPHICDESIGNER2775CVEA$25.02$26.27$27.58$28.96$30.41$2,001.60$2,101.68$2,206.76$2,317.10$2,432.96
GYMNASTICSPECIALIST7543UCHR$15.10$15.86$16.65$17.48$18.36$1,208.09$1,268.50$1,331.92$1,398.52$1,468.44
HOUSINGMANAGER4093SM$49.93$60.21$3,994.07$4,816.81
HOUSINGREHABSPEC4791CVEA$26.10$27.41$28.78$30.22$31.73$2,088.11$2,192.52$2,302.14$2,417.25$2,538.11
HRANALYST3310PRCF$29.09$30.55$32.07$33.68$35.36$2,327.38$2,443.74$2,565.93$2,694.23$2,828.94
HROPERATIONSMANAGER3317SM$45.93$55.83$3,674.27$4,466.10
HRTECHNICIAN3315CONF$22.47$23.60$24.78$26.02$27.32$1,797.96$1,887.86$1,982.25$2,081.36$2,185.43
HUMANSERVICECOORD7551CVEA$24.05$25.26$26.52$27.85$29.24$1,924.37$2,020.58$2,121.61$2,227.69$2,339.08
HVACTECHNICIAN6430CVEA$25.03$26.28$27.60$28.98$30.42$2,002.41$2,102.53$2,207.66$2,318.04$2,433.95
INFOTECHMANAGER5104SM$49.34$59.21$3,947.38$4,736.87
INFOTECHSUPPORTSPECIALIST3014PROF$32.86$34.50$36.23$38.04$39.94$2,628.82$2,760.27$2,898.28$3,043.19$3,195.35
INFORMATIONSYSTECH3041CVEA$21.98$23.08$24.24$25.45$26.72$1,758.73$1,846.67$1,939.00$2,035.95$2,137.75
INTERN,GRADUATE0269UCHR$13.33$14.00$14.70$15.43$16.20$1,066.42$1,119.74$1,175.73$1,234.51$1,296.24
INTERN,UNDERGRADUATE0267UCHR$12.12$12.72$13.36$14.03$14.73$969.47$1,017.95$1,068.84$1,122.29$1,178.40
ITSUPPORTSPECIALIST(HOURLY)3002UCHR$32.86$34.50$36.23$38.04$39.94$2,628.83$2,760.26$2,898.28$3,043.19$3,195.35
LANDSCAPEARCHITECT4480PROF$35.81$37.60$39.48$41.45$43.52$2,864.46$3,007.69$3,158.07$3,315.98$3,481.77
LANDSCAPEINSPECTOR6291CVEA$27.32$28.68$30.12$31.62$33.21$2,185.43$2,294.70$2,409.44$2,529.91$2,656.41
LANDSCAPEPLANNERI4482CVEA$28.21$29.62$31.10$32.66$34.29$2,256.85$2,369.70$2,488.18$2,612.59$2,743.22
LANDSCAPEPLANNERII4483CVEA$31.03$32.58$34.21$35.92$37.72$2,482.54$2,606.66$2,737.00$2,873.85$3,017.54
LATENTPRINTEXAMINER5111CVEA$32.25$33.87$35.56$37.34$39.20$2,580.29$2,709.30$2,844.77$2,987.00$3,136.35
LATENTPRINTEXAMINERHRLY5112UCHR$32.25$33.87$35.56$37.34$39.20$2,580.29$2,709.30$2,844.76$2,987.00$3,136.35
LAWOFFICEMANAGER2465MMUC$32.92$34.57$36.30$38.11$40.02$2,633.92$2,765.62$2,903.90$3,049.10$3,201.55
LEADCUSTODIAN6663CVEA$19.04$20.00$21.00$22.05$23.15$1,523.56$1,599.73$1,679.72$1,763.71$1,851.89
LEGALASSISTANT0183CONF$23.89$25.09$26.34$27.66$29.04$1,911.33$2,006.89$2,107.24$2,212.60$2,323.23
LIBRARIANI7075CVEA$22.69$23.82$25.01$26.26$27.57$1,814.80$1,905.54$2,000.82$2,100.86$2,205.91
LIBRARIANI(HOURLY)7076UCHR$22.69$23.82$25.01$26.26$27.57$1,814.80$1,905.54$2,000.82$2,100.87$2,205.91
LIBRARIANII7073CVEA$24.95$26.20$27.51$28.89$30.33$1,996.29$2,096.10$2,200.91$2,310.95$2,426.50
LIBRARIANII(HOURLY)7074UCHR$24.95$26.20$27.51$28.89$30.33$1,996.29$2,096.10$2,200.91$2,310.95$2,426.50
LIBRARIANIII7071CVEA$27.45$28.82$30.26$31.78$33.36$2,195.92$2,305.71$2,421.00$2,542.05$2,669.15
LIBRARYADMINCOORDINATOR7018PROF$34.91$36.65$38.48$40.41$42.43$2,792.40$2,932.02$3,078.62$3,232.55$3,394.18
LIBRARYAIDE7181UCHR$10.55$11.07$11.63$12.21$12.82$843.66$885.84$930.14$976.64$1,025.47
LIBRARYASSISTANT7157CVEA$16.32$17.13$17.99$18.89$19.83$1,305.36$1,370.63$1,439.15$1,511.11$1,586.67
LIBRARYASSOCIATE7091CVEA$20.62$21.65$22.74$23.87$25.07$1,649.82$1,732.31$1,818.93$1,909.88$2,005.37
LIBRARYASSOCIATE(HOURLY)7092UCHR$20.62$21.65$22.74$23.87$25.07$1,649.82$1,732.31$1,818.93$1,909.88$2,005.37
LIBRARYDIGITALSERVICESMGR7025MM$34.91$36.65$38.48$40.41$42.43$2,792.40$2,932.02$3,078.62$3,232.55$3,394.18
LIBRARYOPERATIONSMANAGER7029MM$44.79$47.02$49.38$51.84$54.44$3,582.80$3,761.93$3,950.03$4,147.54$4,354.91
LIBRARYTECHNICIAN7121CVEA$18.76$19.70$20.69$21.72$22.81$1,501.17$1,576.23$1,655.04$1,737.79$1,824.68
LIBRARYTECHNICIAN(HOURLY)7122UCHR$18.76$19.70$20.69$21.72$22.81$1,501.17$1,576.23$1,655.04$1,737.79$1,824.68
LIBRARYVISITORASSISTANT7185UCHR$13.25$13.92$14.61$15.34$16.11$1,060.32$1,113.34$1,169.01$1,227.46$1,288.83
LIFEGUARDI7587UCHR$13.82$14.52$15.24$16.00$16.80$1,105.96$1,161.26$1,219.33$1,280.29$1,344.31
LIFEGUARDII7585UCHR$15.21$15.97$16.77$17.60$18.48$1,216.59$1,277.42$1,341.29$1,408.36$1,478.77
LITERACY&PROGRAMMINGCOORD7034MM$34.91$36.65$38.48$40.41$42.43$2,792.40$2,932.02$3,078.62$3,232.55$3,394.18
LITERACYTEAMCOORD7036PROF$30.35$31.86$33.46$35.13$36.89$2,427.78$2,549.16$2,676.62$2,810.45$2,950.98
LOCKSMITH6443CVEA$23.84$25.03$26.28$27.60$28.98$1,907.05$2,002.41$2,102.53$2,207.65$2,318.03
MAINTENANCEWORKERI6377CVEA$17.31$18.18$19.09$20.04$21.04$1,385.05$1,454.30$1,527.01$1,603.36$1,683.53
MAINTENANCEWORKERI(HRLY)6379UCHR$17.31$18.18$19.09$20.04$21.04$1,385.04$1,454.30$1,527.01$1,603.36$1,683.53
MAINTENANCEWORKERII6373CVEA$19.04$20.00$21.00$22.05$23.15$1,523.56$1,599.73$1,679.72$1,763.71$1,851.89
MAINTENANCEWORKERIIHRLY6381UCHR$19.04$20.00$21.00$22.05$23.15$1,523.55$1,599.74$1,679.72$1,763.70$1,851.89
MANAGEMENTANALYST0225CVEA$29.26$30.72$32.26$33.87$35.56$2,340.68$2,457.72$2,580.60$2,709.63$2,845.12
MARKTNG&COMMUNICATIONSMGR2781SM$52.60$54.08$63.93$4,207.62$4,326.29$5,114.39
MAYOR2001MY$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$58.58$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$4,686.25
MECHANICASSISTANT6550CVEA$19.02$19.97$20.97$22.02$23.12$1,521.83$1,597.92$1,677.82$1,761.71$1,849.79
MUSEUMATTENDANT7215UCHR$10.94$11.49$12.06$12.67$13.30$875.38$919.15$965.11$1,013.36$1,064.02
OFFICESPECIALIST0161CVEA$16.84$17.69$18.57$19.50$20.47$1,347.46$1,414.84$1,485.58$1,559.86$1,637.83
OFFICESPECIALIST(HOURLY)0160UCHR$16.84$17.69$18.57$19.50$20.47$1,347.46$1,414.84$1,485.58$1,559.86$1,637.82
OFFICESPECIALIST(MYR/@WILL)0162CVEA$16.84$17.69$18.57$19.50$20.47$1,347.47$1,414.84$1,485.58$1,559.86$1,637.82
OFFICESPECIALIST(MYR/AW/HR)0156UCHR$16.84$17.69$18.57$19.50$20.47$1,347.47$1,414.84$1,485.58$1,559.86$1,637.82
OPENSPACECOORD6301MM$32.61$34.24$35.95$37.75$39.64$2,608.80$2,739.24$2,876.20$3,020.01$3,171.02
OPENSPACEINSPECTOR6311CVEA$27.32$28.68$30.12$31.62$33.21$2,185.43$2,294.70$2,409.44$2,529.91$2,656.41
Approvedandadopted:
ResolutionNo.:
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 185
FiscalYear20152016CompensationSchedule
EffectiveJune26,2015
HourlyRateBiWeeklyRate
POSITIONTITLEPCNBARGStepAStepBStepCStepDStepEStepAStepBStepCStepDStepE
OPENSPACEMANAGER6302MM$35.96$37.76$39.65$41.63$43.71$2,876.83$3,020.67$3,171.70$3,330.29$3,496.80
OPS&TELECOMMGR3025MM$40.15$42.16$44.27$46.48$48.81$3,212.37$3,372.99$3,541.64$3,718.72$3,904.66
PAINTER6434CVEA$22.75$23.89$25.09$26.34$27.66$1,820.37$1,911.39$2,006.96$2,107.31$2,212.68
PARKRANGER7434UCHR$13.25$13.91$14.61$15.34$16.10$1,059.90$1,112.89$1,168.53$1,226.96$1,288.31
PARKRANGERSUPERVISOR7441CVEA$29.03$30.48$32.00$33.60$35.28$2,322.07$2,438.31$2,560.22$2,688.23$2,822.64
PARKINGCONTROLOFFICER5151CVEA$17.02$17.87$18.77$19.71$20.69$1,361.89$1,429.98$1,501.48$1,576.55$1,655.38
PARKINGENFORCEMENTOFFICER5154CVEA$17.02$17.87$18.77$19.71$20.69$1,361.89$1,429.98$1,501.48$1,576.55$1,655.38
PARKINGMETERTECH(HOURLY)3694UCHR$18.73$19.66$20.65$21.68$22.76$1,498.08$1,572.98$1,651.62$1,734.21$1,820.92
PARKINGMETERTECHNICIAN3693CVEA$18.73$19.66$20.65$21.68$22.76$1,498.08$1,572.98$1,651.62$1,734.20$1,820.92
PARKSMANAGER6604MM$35.26$37.03$38.88$40.82$42.86$2,820.97$2,962.02$3,110.11$3,265.62$3,428.90
PARKSOPERATIONSMANAGER6610MM$44.53$46.76$49.10$51.55$54.13$3,562.60$3,740.73$3,927.77$4,124.15$4,330.36
PARKSSUPERVISOR6605CVEA$29.03$30.48$32.00$33.60$35.28$2,322.20$2,438.31$2,560.22$2,688.23$2,822.65
PEACEOFFICER5061POA$33.30$34.97$36.71$38.55$40.48$2,664.11$2,797.32$2,937.19$3,084.04$3,238.25
PERFORMANCE&ORGDEVMGR2758SM$50.18$60.21$4,014.04$4,816.81
PERMITSPROCESSINGSUPERVISOR4719MM$32.99$34.64$36.37$38.19$40.10$2,639.43$2,771.41$2,909.98$3,055.48$3,208.25
PLANCHECKSUPERVISOR4731MM$43.85$46.05$48.35$50.77$53.31$3,508.37$3,683.79$3,867.98$4,061.38$4,264.45
PLANCHECKTECHNICIAN4753CVEA$26.13$27.44$28.81$30.25$31.76$2,090.41$2,194.93$2,304.68$2,419.91$2,540.91
PLANNINGMANAGER4727SM$51.83$62.52$4,146.23$5,001.77
PLANNINGTECHNICIAN4527CVEA$21.47$22.54$23.67$24.85$26.10$1,717.58$1,803.45$1,893.63$1,988.31$2,087.72
PLUMBER6432CVEA$25.03$26.28$27.60$28.98$30.42$2,002.41$2,102.53$2,207.65$2,318.03$2,433.94
POLICEADMINSVCSADMINISTRATO5025SM$50.74$61.68$4,059.48$4,934.32
POLICEAGENT5051POA$36.67$38.50$40.43$42.45$44.57$2,933.62$3,080.30$3,234.32$3,396.03$3,565.83
POLICECADET5427UCHR$11.22$11.78$12.37$12.98$13.63$897.24$942.10$989.20$1,038.66$1,090.60
POLICECAPTAIN5022SM$63.16$76.78$5,053.18$6,142.17
POLICECOMMRELSPECIALIST5258CVEA$21.98$23.08$24.24$25.45$26.72$1,758.57$1,846.51$1,938.83$2,035.78$2,137.56
POLICECOMMSYSTEMSMANAGER5185MM$39.76$41.75$43.83$46.02$48.33$3,180.63$3,339.65$3,506.64$3,681.96$3,866.07
POLICEDATASPECIALIST0163CVEA$16.84$17.69$18.57$19.50$20.47$1,347.46$1,414.84$1,485.58$1,559.86$1,637.85
POLICEDISPATCHER5181CVEA$25.28$26.54$27.87$29.26$30.73$2,022.25$2,123.36$2,229.53$2,341.01$2,458.06
POLICEDISPATCHER(HOURLY)5180UCHR$25.28$26.54$27.87$29.26$30.73$2,022.25$2,123.37$2,229.53$2,341.01$2,458.06
POLICEDISPATCHERSUPERVISOR5183CVEA$29.07$30.52$32.05$33.65$35.33$2,325.59$2,441.86$2,563.96$2,692.16$2,826.76
POLICEDISPATCHERTRAINEE5179CVEA$22.98$24.13$25.34$26.60$27.93$1,838.41$1,930.33$2,026.84$2,128.19$2,234.60
POLICELIEUTENANT5031POA$50.62$53.15$55.81$58.60$61.53$4,049.76$4,252.24$4,464.85$4,688.10$4,922.51
POLICEREC&SUPPORTSUPV5203CVEA$22.28$23.39$24.56$25.79$27.08$1,782.02$1,871.12$1,964.67$2,062.91$2,166.06
POLICERECTRANSCRIPT(HRLY)0168UCHR$16.84$17.69$18.57$19.50$20.47$1,347.46$1,414.84$1,485.58$1,559.86$1,637.85
POLICERECORDSSPEC(HOURLY)0166UCHR$16.84$17.69$18.57$19.50$20.47$1,347.46$1,414.84$1,485.58$1,559.86$1,637.85
POLICERECORDSSPECIALIST0165CVEA$16.84$17.69$18.57$19.50$20.47$1,347.46$1,414.84$1,485.58$1,559.86$1,637.85
POLICERECORDSTRANSCRIPTION0167CVEA$16.84$17.69$18.57$19.50$20.47$1,347.46$1,414.84$1,485.58$1,559.86$1,637.85
POLICERECRUIT5071CVEA$24.79$26.03$1,983.34$2,082.51
POLICESERGEANT5041POA$42.18$44.29$46.51$48.83$51.27$3,374.54$3,543.27$3,720.43$3,906.45$4,101.78
POLICESERVICESOFF(HOURLY)5133UCHR$22.66$23.79$24.98$26.23$27.54$1,812.67$1,903.30$1,998.46$2,098.38$2,203.31
POLICESERVICESOFFICER5131CVEA$22.66$23.79$24.98$26.23$27.54$1,812.66$1,903.30$1,998.46$2,098.38$2,203.31
POLICESERVICESTECHNICIAN5415CVEA$21.62$22.70$23.83$25.02$26.28$1,729.36$1,815.82$1,906.61$2,001.95$2,102.04
POLICESUPPORTSERVICESMGR5205MM$33.66$35.35$37.11$38.97$40.92$2,692.98$2,827.63$2,969.01$3,117.46$3,273.33
POLICESVCSOFFICERSUPERVISOR5132CVEA$26.06$27.37$28.73$30.16$31.67$2,084.56$2,189.83$2,298.22$2,413.14$2,533.79
POLICESVCSTECH(HOURLY)5416UCHR$21.62$22.70$23.83$25.02$26.28$1,729.36$1,815.82$1,906.61$2,001.95$2,102.04
POLICETECHSPECIALIST(HRLY)5108UCHR$34.17$35.88$37.68$39.56$41.54$2,733.98$2,870.67$3,014.20$3,164.93$3,323.17
POLICETECHNOLOGYSPECIALIST5107CVEA$34.17$35.88$37.68$39.56$41.54$2,733.98$2,870.67$3,014.20$3,164.93$3,323.17
POLICETRAINING&DEVSUPV5264PROF$33.13$34.78$36.52$38.35$40.27$2,650.24$2,782.75$2,921.90$3,067.99$3,221.39
POLICYAIDE2013PRUC$23.66$24.84$26.08$27.39$28.76$1,892.59$1,987.22$2,086.56$2,190.91$2,300.45
PRINCIPALCIVILENGINEER6021MM$47.93$50.33$52.85$55.49$58.26$3,834.56$4,026.29$4,227.60$4,438.98$4,660.94
PRINCIPALECONOMICDEVSPEC2724PROF$42.97$45.12$47.37$49.74$52.23$3,437.36$3,609.23$3,789.69$3,979.17$4,178.13
PRINCIPALHRANALYST3306PRCF$38.64$40.57$42.60$44.73$46.97$3,091.35$3,245.92$3,408.22$3,578.63$3,757.56
PRINCIPALLANDSCAPEARCHITECT4486MM$42.72$44.86$47.10$49.46$51.93$3,417.89$3,588.78$3,768.22$3,956.63$4,154.46
PRINCIPALLIBRARIAN7051MM$34.91$36.65$38.48$40.41$42.43$2,792.40$2,932.02$3,078.62$3,232.55$3,394.18
PRINCIPALMANAGEMENTANALYST0208PROF$37.16$39.02$40.97$43.02$45.17$2,973.00$3,121.66$3,277.74$3,441.62$3,613.71
PRINCIPALMGMTANALYST(CONF)0214PRCF$37.16$39.02$40.97$43.02$45.17$2,973.00$3,121.66$3,277.74$3,441.62$3,613.71
PRINCIPALMGTANALYST(HOURLY)0200UCHR$36.05$38.26$40.18$42.18$44.29$2,883.75$3,061.04$3,214.09$3,374.79$3,543.54
PRINCIPALPLANNER4431MM$42.97$45.12$47.37$49.74$52.23$3,437.36$3,609.23$3,789.69$3,979.17$4,178.13
PRINCIPALPROJECTCOORDINATOR4212PROF$42.97$45.12$47.37$49.74$52.23$3,437.36$3,609.23$3,789.69$3,979.17$4,178.13
PRINCIPALRECREATIONMANAGER7410MM$36.23$38.04$39.95$41.94$44.04$2,898.54$3,043.46$3,195.64$3,355.42$3,523.19
PRINCIPALREVENUEANALYST3608PROF$32.48$34.10$35.81$37.60$39.48$2,598.44$2,728.36$2,864.78$3,008.02$3,158.42
PROCUREMENTSPECIALIST3721CVEA$26.56$27.89$29.28$30.75$32.29$2,124.87$2,231.12$2,342.67$2,459.81$2,582.80
PROGRAMMERANALYST3090PROF$32.53$34.16$35.87$37.66$39.54$2,602.54$2,732.67$2,869.30$3,012.76$3,163.40
PROJECTCOORDINATORI4217CVEA$28.21$29.62$31.10$32.66$34.29$2,256.86$2,369.69$2,488.18$2,612.58$2,743.21
PROJECTCOORDINATORI(HRLY)4218UCHR$28.21$29.62$31.10$32.66$34.29$2,256.86$2,369.69$2,488.18$2,612.58$2,743.22
PROJECTCOORDINATORII4215CVEA$31.03$32.58$34.21$35.92$37.72$2,482.54$2,606.66$2,736.99$2,873.85$3,017.54
Approvedandadopted:
ResolutionNo.:
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 186
FiscalYear20152016CompensationSchedule
EffectiveJune26,2015
HourlyRateBiWeeklyRate
POSITIONTITLEPCNBARGStepAStepBStepCStepDStepEStepAStepBStepCStepDStepE
PROJECTCOORDINATORII(HRLY)4216UCHR$31.03$32.58$34.21$35.92$37.72$2,482.54$2,606.66$2,736.99$2,873.85$3,017.54
PROPERTY&EVIDENCESPECIALIST5127CVEA$18.73$19.66$20.65$21.68$22.76$1,498.08$1,572.98$1,651.63$1,734.21$1,820.92
PUBWORKSSPECIALIST6712CVEA$21.78$22.86$24.01$25.21$26.47$1,742.01$1,829.11$1,920.56$2,016.59$2,117.42
PUBLICINFOOFFICER(HRLY)5032UCHR$35.72$37.50$39.38$41.34$43.41$2,857.23$3,000.09$3,150.09$3,307.59$3,472.98
PUBLICINFOOFFICER(PD)5034PROF$35.72$37.50$39.38$41.35$43.41$2,857.23$3,000.09$3,150.09$3,307.60$3,472.98
PUBLICINFORMATIONSPECIALIST2782CONF$26.74$28.07$29.48$30.95$32.50$2,139.03$2,245.98$2,358.28$2,476.19$2,600.00
PUBLICSAFETYANALYST5254CVEA$29.26$30.72$32.26$33.87$35.56$2,340.69$2,457.72$2,580.61$2,709.64$2,845.12
PUBLICSAFETYANALYST(HRLY)5256UCHR$29.26$30.72$32.26$33.87$35.56$2,340.69$2,457.72$2,580.61$2,709.64$2,845.12
PUBLICWORKSCOORDINATOR6324PROF$32.48$34.10$35.81$37.60$39.48$2,598.44$2,728.36$2,864.78$3,008.02$3,158.42
PUBLICWORKSINSPI6123CVEA$27.32$28.68$30.12$31.62$33.21$2,185.43$2,294.70$2,409.44$2,529.91$2,656.41
PUBLICWORKSINSPII6121CVEA$30.05$31.55$33.13$34.79$36.53$2,403.97$2,524.17$2,650.38$2,782.90$2,922.05
PUBLICWORKSMANAGER6336MM$35.96$37.76$39.65$41.63$43.71$2,876.83$3,020.67$3,171.70$3,330.29$3,496.80
PUBLICWORKSSUPERVISOR6337CVEA$29.03$30.48$32.00$33.60$35.28$2,322.20$2,438.31$2,560.22$2,688.23$2,822.65
PUMPMAINTTECHNICIAN6396CVEA$24.80$26.04$27.34$28.71$30.14$1,983.87$2,083.06$2,187.22$2,296.58$2,411.41
PUMPMAINTENANCESUPERVISOR6392CVEA$29.06$30.51$32.04$33.64$35.32$2,324.89$2,441.14$2,563.20$2,691.35$2,825.92
PURCHASINGAGENT3711SM$45.93$55.83$3,674.27$4,466.10
RANGEMASTER5417CVEA$20.60$21.63$22.71$23.85$25.04$1,647.88$1,730.28$1,816.79$1,907.63$2,003.01
RANGEMASTER(HOURLY)5418UCHR$20.60$21.63$22.71$23.85$25.04$1,647.88$1,730.27$1,816.79$1,907.63$2,003.01
RCFLNETWORKENGINEER5450UCHR$31.93$33.53$35.20$36.96$38.81$2,554.37$2,682.08$2,816.19$2,956.99$3,104.84
REALPROPERTYMANAGER6037MMUC$41.68$43.76$45.95$48.25$50.66$3,334.40$3,501.12$3,676.17$3,859.98$4,052.98
RECAIDE7605UCHR$9.55$10.03$10.53$11.06$11.61$764.21$802.42$842.54$884.67$928.90
RECSPECIALIST7601UCHR$15.10$15.86$16.65$17.48$18.36$1,208.09$1,268.50$1,331.92$1,398.52$1,468.44
RECSUPERVISORI(HOURLY)7426UCHR$21.87$22.96$24.11$25.31$26.58$1,749.42$1,836.90$1,928.74$2,025.18$2,126.44
RECORDSMANAGER2211MM$30.95$32.50$34.13$35.83$37.62$2,476.26$2,600.08$2,730.09$2,866.59$3,009.92
RECORDSSPECIALIST2217CVEA$18.53$19.45$20.43$21.45$22.52$1,482.22$1,556.33$1,634.14$1,715.85$1,801.64
RECREATIONLEADERI7609UCHR$10.94$11.49$12.06$12.67$13.30$875.38$919.15$965.08$1,013.36$1,064.02
RECREATIONLEADERII7607UCHR$12.58$13.21$13.87$14.56$15.29$1,006.13$1,056.44$1,109.27$1,164.73$1,222.97
RECREATIONSUPERVISORI7425CVEA$21.87$22.96$24.11$25.31$26.58$1,749.42$1,836.89$1,928.74$2,025.18$2,126.43
RECREATIONSUPERVISORII7423CVEA$24.05$25.26$26.52$27.85$29.24$1,924.37$2,020.58$2,121.61$2,227.69$2,339.08
RECREATIONSUPERVISORIII7422CVEA$27.66$29.05$30.50$32.02$33.62$2,213.02$2,323.67$2,439.87$2,561.86$2,689.95
RECYCLINGSPECIALISTI2742CVEA$21.57$22.65$23.78$24.97$26.22$1,725.70$1,811.99$1,902.59$1,997.72$2,097.61
RECYCLINGSPECIALISTII2744CVEA$23.73$24.91$26.16$27.47$28.84$1,898.28$1,993.19$2,092.86$2,197.50$2,307.38
REDEVELOPMENTMANAGER4045SM$47.25$57.43$3,779.93$4,594.51
REDEVLPCOORDINATOR4042PROF$44.86$47.10$49.46$51.93$54.53$3,588.78$3,768.22$3,956.63$4,154.47$4,362.19
REGISTEREDVETTECH(HOURLY)5312UCHR$20.60$21.63$22.71$23.85$25.04$1,647.88$1,730.27$1,816.79$1,907.63$2,003.01
REGISTEREDVETERINARYTECH5307CVEA$20.60$21.63$22.71$23.85$25.04$1,647.88$1,730.28$1,816.79$1,907.63$2,003.01
RESERVEOFFICER5081UCHR$14.24$14.95$15.69$0.00$0.00$1,139.42$1,195.85$1,255.53$0.00$0.00
RISKMANAGEMENTSPECIALIST 3367PRCF$28.81$30.25$31.76$33.35$35.02$2,304.56$2,419.78$2,540.78$2,667.82$2,801.21
RISKMANAGER3361SM$46.39$56.38$3,711.01$4,510.76
SCHOOLCROSSINGGUARD5143UCHR$10.05$10.55$11.08$11.64$12.22$804.19$844.39$886.62$930.94$977.49
SEASONALASSISTANT0231UCHR$9.55$10.03$10.53$11.06$11.61$764.21$802.42$842.54$884.67$928.90
SECRETARY0171CVEA$18.53$19.45$20.43$21.45$22.52$1,482.21$1,556.32$1,634.14$1,715.85$1,801.64
SECRETARY(HOURLY)0152UCHR$18.53$19.45$20.43$21.45$22.52$1,482.21$1,556.32$1,634.14$1,715.85$1,801.64
SIGNALSYSTEMSENGINEERI6169CVEA$31.41$32.98$34.63$36.36$38.17$2,512.48$2,638.11$2,770.01$2,908.52$3,053.94
SIGNALSYSTEMSENGINEERII6170CVEA$34.55$36.27$38.09$39.99$41.99$2,763.74$2,901.92$3,047.02$3,199.37$3,359.33
SIGNING&STRIPINGSUPERVISOR6355CVEA$29.03$30.48$32.00$33.60$35.28$2,322.20$2,438.31$2,560.22$2,688.23$2,822.65
SPECIALEVENTSCOORDINATOR2799PRUC$35.72$37.50$39.38$41.34$43.41$2,857.23$3,000.09$3,150.09$3,307.59$3,472.98
SPECIALPLANNINGPROJMGR4101SM$43.31$52.65$3,465.09$4,211.84
SRACCOUNTANT3630MMCF$38.07$39.97$41.97$44.07$46.27$3,045.44$3,197.71$3,357.60$3,525.48$3,701.75
SRACCOUNTINGASST3651CVEA$22.02$23.12$24.27$25.49$26.76$1,761.22$1,849.29$1,941.75$2,038.84$2,140.78
SRADMINISTRATIVESECRETARY0145CONF$26.02$27.32$28.69$30.13$31.63$2,081.85$2,185.94$2,295.24$2,410.00$2,530.50
SRADMINISTRATIVESECRETARY0185CVEA$26.02$27.32$28.69$30.13$31.63$2,081.85$2,185.94$2,295.24$2,410.00$2,530.50
SRANIMALCARESPECIALIST5345CVEA$19.74$20.73$21.76$22.85$23.99$1,579.22$1,658.18$1,741.09$1,828.14$1,919.54
SRAPPLICATIONSSUPPORTSPEC3089PROF$36.15$37.95$39.85$41.84$43.94$2,891.71$3,036.30$3,188.11$3,347.52$3,514.89
SRASSTCITYATTORNEY2403EXEC$72.15$87.69$5,771.67$7,015.51
SRBUILDINGINSPECTOR4781CVEA$34.56$36.29$38.10$40.00$42.00$2,764.57$2,902.80$3,047.93$3,200.33$3,360.35
SRBUSINESSLICENSEREP4507CVEA$22.02$23.12$24.27$25.49$26.76$1,761.22$1,849.29$1,941.75$2,038.84$2,140.78
SRCIVILENGINEER6019WCE$43.35$45.51$47.79$50.18$52.69$3,467.77$3,641.17$3,823.23$4,014.39$4,215.10
SRCODEENFOFF(HOURLY)4764UCHR$33.02$34.67$36.40$38.22$40.13$2,641.45$2,773.54$2,912.21$3,057.82$3,210.71
SRCODEENFORCEMENTOFF4763CVEA$33.02$34.67$36.40$38.22$40.13$2,641.46$2,773.53$2,912.21$3,057.82$3,210.71
SRCOUNCILASST2027CONF$20.31$21.33$22.40$23.52$24.69$1,625.06$1,706.31$1,791.63$1,881.21$1,975.27
SRCOUNCILASST2025UCHR$25.45$26.73$28.06$29.47$30.94$2,036.31$2,138.13$2,245.03$2,357.28$2,475.15
SRDEPUTYCITYCLERK2208PRUC$30.93$32.47$34.10$35.80$37.59$2,474.12$2,597.83$2,727.72$2,864.10$3,007.31
SRECONOMICDEVSPEC2725PROF$28.24$29.66$31.14$32.69$34.33$2,259.44$2,372.42$2,491.04$2,615.59$2,746.37
SRELECTRICIAN6442CVEA$28.78$30.22$31.74$33.32$34.99$2,302.77$2,417.91$2,538.81$2,665.75$2,799.03
SRELECTRONICSTECHNICIAN6471CVEA$31.66$33.25$34.91$36.65$38.49$2,533.10$2,659.76$2,792.74$2,932.38$3,079.00
SRENGINEERINGTECHNICIAN6059CVEA$30.05$31.55$33.13$34.79$36.53$2,403.97$2,524.17$2,650.38$2,782.90$2,922.05
SREQUIPMENTMAINTENANCESUPV6503MM$31.06$32.61$34.24$35.95$37.75$2,484.57$2,608.80$2,739.24$2,876.20$3,020.01
SREQUIPMENTMECHANIC6512CVEA$27.16$28.52$29.95$31.44$33.02$2,173.00$2,281.66$2,395.74$2,515.52$2,641.30
SRFIREINSP/INVEST5529IAFF$35.77$37.56$39.44$41.41$43.48$2,861.74$3,004.83$3,155.07$3,312.82$3,478.47
SRFISCALOFFICESPECIALIST0141CONF$19.45$20.43$21.45$22.52$23.65$1,556.32$1,634.14$1,715.85$1,801.64$1,891.72
Approvedandadopted:
ResolutionNo.:
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 187
FiscalYear20152016CompensationSchedule
EffectiveJune26,2015
HourlyRateBiWeeklyRate
POSITIONTITLEPCNBARGStepAStepBStepCStepDStepEStepAStepBStepCStepDStepE
SRFISCALOFFICESPECIALIST0175CVEA$19.45$20.43$21.45$22.52$23.65$1,556.32$1,634.14$1,715.85$1,801.64$1,891.72
SRFISCALOFFICESPECIALIST0176UCHR$19.45$20.43$21.45$22.52$23.65$1,556.32$1,634.14$1,715.85$1,801.64$1,891.72
SRGARDENER6621CVEA$22.85$24.00$25.20$26.46$27.78$1,828.27$1,919.68$2,015.67$2,116.45$2,222.28
SRGISSPECIALIST3080CVEA$31.07$32.62$34.25$35.97$37.76$2,485.44$2,609.71$2,740.19$2,877.20$3,021.06
SRGRAPHICDESIGNER2764PROF$32.36$33.98$35.68$37.46$39.34$2,588.92$2,718.37$2,854.28$2,997.00$3,146.84
SRHRANALYST3308PRCF$33.46$35.13$36.89$38.73$40.67$2,676.48$2,810.30$2,950.83$3,098.37$3,253.28
SRHUMANRESOURCESTECHNICIAN3316CONF$25.85$27.14$28.50$29.92$31.42$2,067.88$2,171.28$2,279.83$2,393.84$2,513.52
SRHVACTECHNICIAN6441CVEA$28.78$30.22$31.74$33.32$34.99$2,302.77$2,417.91$2,538.81$2,665.75$2,799.03
SRINFOTECHSUPPORTSPEC3012PROF$36.15$37.95$39.85$41.84$43.94$2,891.71$3,036.30$3,188.11$3,347.52$3,514.89
SRLANDSURVEYOR6285WCE$43.35$45.51$47.79$50.18$52.69$3,467.77$3,641.16$3,823.22$4,014.38$4,215.10
SRLANDSCAPEINSPECTOR6295CVEA$31.42$32.99$34.64$36.37$38.19$2,513.25$2,638.91$2,770.86$2,909.40$3,054.87
SRLEGALASSISTANT2463CONF$26.28$27.59$28.97$30.42$31.94$2,102.46$2,207.59$2,317.97$2,433.86$2,555.56
SRLIBRARIAN7053MM$30.35$31.87$33.46$35.14$36.89$2,428.18$2,549.59$2,677.07$2,810.92$2,951.47
SRLIFEGUARD7589UCHR$16.72$17.55$18.43$19.35$20.32$1,337.40$1,404.27$1,474.48$1,548.21$1,625.62
SRMAINTENANCEWORKER6371CVEA$22.85$24.00$25.20$26.46$27.78$1,828.27$1,919.68$2,015.67$2,116.45$2,222.28
SRMANAGEMENTANALYST0206PROF$33.78$35.47$37.25$39.11$41.06$2,702.72$2,837.86$2,979.76$3,128.74$3,285.18
SRMANAGEMENTANALYST(HOURLY)0210UCHR$33.78$35.47$37.25$39.11$41.06$2,702.72$2,837.85$2,979.76$3,128.74$3,285.18
SROFFICESPECIALIST0173CVEA$18.53$19.45$20.43$21.45$22.52$1,482.21$1,556.32$1,634.14$1,715.85$1,801.64
SROFFICESPECIALIST(HOURLY)0174UCHR$18.53$19.45$20.43$21.45$22.52$1,482.21$1,556.32$1,634.14$1,715.85$1,801.64
SROPENSPACEINSPECTOR6309CVEA$31.42$32.99$34.64$36.37$38.19$2,513.25$2,638.91$2,770.86$2,909.40$3,054.87
SRPARKRANGER7439CVEA$22.85$24.00$25.20$26.46$27.78$1,828.27$1,919.68$2,015.67$2,116.46$2,222.27
SRPLANCHECKENGINEER4746WCE$41.46$43.54$45.71$48.00$50.40$3,317.01$3,482.86$3,657.00$3,839.85$4,031.84
SRPLANCHECKTECHNICIAN4751CVEA$30.05$31.55$33.13$34.79$36.53$2,403.98$2,524.18$2,650.39$2,782.90$2,922.05
SRPLANNER4432PROF$35.81$37.60$39.48$41.45$43.52$2,864.46$3,007.69$3,158.07$3,315.98$3,481.77
SRPLANNINGTECHNICIAN4529CVEA$24.69$25.92$27.22$28.58$30.01$1,975.21$2,073.97$2,177.67$2,286.55$2,400.88
SRPOLICEDATASPECIALIST0164CVEA$19.37$20.34$21.36$22.42$23.54$1,549.59$1,627.07$1,708.42$1,793.84$1,883.54
SRPOLICETECHNOLOGYSPEC5109PROF$39.30$41.27$43.33$45.50$47.77$3,144.08$3,301.28$3,466.35$3,639.67$3,821.65
SRPROCUREMENTSPECIALIST3728PROF$29.37$30.84$32.38$34.00$35.70$2,349.62$2,467.10$2,590.46$2,719.98$2,855.98
SRPROGRAMMERANALYST3091PROF$36.50$38.33$40.25$42.26$44.37$2,920.34$3,066.36$3,219.68$3,380.66$3,549.69
SRPROJECTCOORDINATOR4214PROF$35.81$37.60$39.48$41.45$43.52$2,864.47$3,007.69$3,158.07$3,315.97$3,481.78
SRPROPERTY&EVIDENCESPECIALIST5125CVEA$21.53$22.61$23.74$24.93$26.18$1,722.79$1,808.93$1,899.37$1,994.34$2,094.06
SRPUBLICSAFETYANALYST5260PROF$32.35$33.97$35.67$37.45$39.33$2,588.26$2,717.67$2,853.56$2,996.23$3,146.05
SRPUBLICWORKSINSP6101CVEA$34.56$36.29$38.10$40.00$42.00$2,764.57$2,902.80$3,047.94$3,200.33$3,360.35
SRPUBLICWORKSSPECIALIST6702CVEA$26.13$27.44$28.81$30.25$31.76$2,090.41$2,194.93$2,304.68$2,419.91$2,540.91
SRRECORDSSPECIALIST2215CVEA$21.31$22.37$23.49$24.67$25.90$1,704.54$1,789.77$1,879.26$1,973.23$2,071.89
SRRECREATIONMGR7421MM$31.20$32.76$34.39$36.11$37.92$2,495.76$2,620.54$2,751.57$2,889.15$3,033.61
SRRISKMANAGEMENTSPECIALIST 3365PRCF$33.46$35.13$36.89$38.73$40.67$2,676.48$2,810.30$2,950.83$3,098.37$3,253.28
SRSECRETARY0139CONF$20.38$21.40$22.47$23.59$24.77$1,630.43$1,711.95$1,797.55$1,887.43$1,981.80
SRSECRETARY0177CVEA$20.38$21.40$22.47$23.59$24.77$1,630.43$1,711.95$1,797.55$1,887.43$1,981.80
SRSECRETARY(HOURLY)0178UCHR$20.38$21.40$22.47$23.59$24.77$1,630.44$1,711.96$1,797.55$1,887.43$1,981.80
SRTREETRIMMER6573CVEA$25.14$26.40$27.72$29.10$30.56$2,011.09$2,111.64$2,217.22$2,328.09$2,444.49
SRWEBMASTER2779PROF$32.48$34.10$35.81$37.60$39.48$2,598.41$2,728.33$2,864.74$3,007.98$3,158.38
STOREKEEPER3734CVEA$19.04$20.00$21.00$22.05$23.15$1,523.56$1,599.73$1,679.72$1,763.71$1,851.89
STOREKEEPERSUPERVISOR3732CVEA$22.85$24.00$25.20$26.46$27.78$1,828.27$1,919.68$2,015.67$2,116.45$2,222.28
STORMWTRCOMPLNCEINSPI6127CVEA$24.83$26.08$27.38$28.75$30.19$1,986.75$2,086.09$2,190.39$2,299.91$2,414.91
STORMWTRCOMPLNCEINSPII6125CVEA$27.32$28.68$30.12$31.62$33.21$2,185.44$2,294.70$2,409.44$2,529.91$2,656.41
SURVEYTECHNICIANI6151CVEA$23.75$24.94$26.19$27.50$28.87$1,900.37$1,995.39$2,095.16$2,199.92$2,309.91
SURVEYTECHNICIANII6141CVEA$26.13$27.44$28.81$30.25$31.76$2,090.41$2,194.93$2,304.68$2,419.91$2,540.91
SYSTEMS/DATABASEADMINISTRATR3015PROF$36.14$37.95$39.85$41.84$43.93$2,891.47$3,036.05$3,187.85$3,347.24$3,514.60
TELECOMMUNICATIONSSPECIALIST3027CVEA$21.98$23.08$24.24$25.45$26.72$1,758.74$1,846.66$1,939.00$2,035.95$2,137.75
TINYTOTAIDE7503UCHR$12.58$13.21$13.87$14.56$15.29$1,006.13$1,056.44$1,109.27$1,164.73$1,222.97
TINYTOTSPECIALIST7505UCHR$15.10$15.86$16.65$17.48$18.36$1,208.09$1,268.50$1,331.92$1,398.52$1,468.44
TRAFFICCONTROLASSISTANT5155UCHR$15.69$1,255.20
TRAFFICDEVICESTECH6177CVEA$27.53$28.91$30.36$31.87$33.47$2,202.69$2,312.83$2,428.47$2,549.89$2,677.39
TRAFFICDEVICESTECHSUPV6175CVEA$31.66$33.25$34.91$36.65$38.49$2,533.10$2,659.75$2,792.74$2,932.38$3,079.00
TRAFFICENGINEER6024PROF$37.37$39.24$41.20$43.26$45.42$2,989.46$3,138.93$3,295.88$3,460.68$3,633.71
TRAFFICOFFICER(HOURLY)5293UCHR$14.24$14.95$15.69$1,139.42$1,195.84$1,255.53
TRAININGPROGRAMSPEC(HRLY)5250UCHR$21.98$23.08$24.24$25.45$26.72$1,758.57$1,846.51$1,938.84$2,035.78$2,137.56
TRAININGPROGRAMSSPECIALIST5262CVEA$21.98$23.08$24.24$25.45$26.72$1,758.57$1,846.51$1,938.83$2,035.78$2,137.56
TRANSENGINEERW/CERT6031WCE$43.35$45.51$47.79$50.18$52.69$3,467.77$3,641.16$3,823.22$4,014.38$4,215.10
TRANSENGINEERW/OCERT6033WCE$41.28$43.35$45.51$47.79$50.18$3,302.64$3,467.77$3,641.16$3,823.22$4,014.38
TREASURYANDBUSINESSMANAGER3611SM$53.76$65.35$4,300.87$5,227.74
TREETRIMMER6575CVEA$20.95$22.00$23.10$24.25$25.46$1,675.91$1,759.70$1,847.69$1,940.07$2,037.08
TREETRIMMERSUPERVISOR6572CVEA$28.91$30.36$31.87$33.47$35.14$2,312.76$2,428.40$2,549.82$2,677.31$2,811.17
VETERINARIAN5321PROF$36.69$38.52$40.45$42.47$44.59$2,934.87$3,081.61$3,235.69$3,397.48$3,567.37
VETERINARIAN(HOURLY)5308UCHR$45.85$48.15$50.56$53.09$55.74$3,667.78$3,852.02$4,044.62$4,246.85$4,459.19
VETERINARIAN(PERMITTED)5331PROF$51.65$54.24$56.95$59.80$62.79$4,132.31$4,338.92$4,555.87$4,783.66$5,022.84
VETERINARIANPERMITTED5322UCHR$64.84$68.08$71.48$75.06$78.81$5,186.99$5,446.34$5,718.66$6,004.59$6,304.82
VETERINARYASSISTANT5325CVEA$17.17$18.02$18.93$19.87$20.86$1,373.23$1,441.90$1,514.00$1,589.69$1,669.18
VETERINARYASSISTANT(HOURLY)5323UCHR$17.17$18.02$18.92$19.87$20.86$1,373.24$1,441.90$1,513.99$1,589.69$1,669.18
VOLUNTEERCOORD(DEPT)7131CVEA$18.76$19.70$20.69$21.72$22.81$1,501.17$1,576.23$1,655.04$1,737.79$1,824.68
VOLUNTEERCOORD(DEPT)(HOURLY)7132UCHR$18.76$19.70$20.69$21.72$22.81$1,501.17$1,576.23$1,655.04$1,737.79$1,824.68
Approvedandadopted:
ResolutionNo.:
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 188
FiscalYear20152016CompensationSchedule
EffectiveJune26,2015
HourlyRateBiWeeklyRate
POSITIONTITLEPCNBARGStepAStepBStepCStepDStepEStepAStepBStepCStepDStepE
WASTEWATERCOLLECTIONSMGR6334MM$40.98$43.03$45.18$47.44$49.81$3,278.51$3,442.44$3,614.56$3,795.29$3,985.05
WEBMASTER2777CVEA$28.24$29.66$31.14$32.70$34.33$2,259.49$2,372.46$2,491.09$2,615.64$2,746.42
WEBMASTER(HOURLY)2790UCHR$28.24$29.66$31.14$32.70$34.33$2,259.49$2,372.47$2,491.09$2,615.64$2,746.42
YOUTHCOORDINATOR7481CVEA$24.05$25.26$26.52$27.85$29.24$1,924.37$2,020.58$2,121.61$2,227.69$2,339.08
wĻǝźƭĻķʹ
July21,2015
Approvedandadopted:
ResolutionNo.:
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 189
COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. __________
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA AMENDING THE COMPENSATION
SCHEDULE AND CLASSIFICATION PLAN TO REFLECT
THE ADDITION AND REMOVAL OF VARIOUS POSITION
TITLES, AMENDING THE AUTHORIZED POSITION COUNT
IN VARIOUS DEPARTMENTSWITH NO NET CHANGE IN
AUTHORIZED STAFFING, AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS
THEREFOR (4/5 VOTE REQUIRED)
WHEREAS, Human Resources staff completed several department and employee-
initiated classification reviews; and
WHEREAS, the City Attorney’s Office is proposing an increase in the salary of the Law
Office Manager, an unclassified, “at will” position, to reflect what the City Attorney has
determined to be increased duties and expectations beyond those reflected in the position’s
current description. A lack of comparable positions in the local and regional market prevents a
salary survey from being completed for this classification.
WHEREAS, the recommended changes include a number of new classification titles that
are not currently reflected in the Compensation Schedule and Classification Plan; and
WHEREAS, the recommended changes to the Compensation Schedule and Classification
Plan include the addition of the following new titles of Accounts Payable Supervisor, FA Senior
Financial Analyst, FA Financial Manager, FA IVDC-LECC Executive Director and Senior
Electronics Technician; and
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 190
Resolution No. _________
Page 2
WHEREAS, a summary of the proposed new classifications and updated classifications
and theirE-Step salaries are as follows:
WHEREAS, the recommended changes to the Compensation Schedule and Classification
Plan include the removalof the titles ofCBAG IV-LECC Director, Intern I, Intern II and Intern
III;and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula
Vista, that itapproves the amendments to the Compensation Schedule and Classification Plan to
reflectthe changes described above.
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 191
Resolution No. _________
Page 3
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, that it
approves the following changes to the fiscal year 2015 authorized position countwith no net
change in authorized staffing:
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, that it
approves an appropriation totaling $36,965to the personnel categoryof the Police Grant Fund,
which will be fully reimbursed by High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area (HIDTA) grant funds
and amending $1,479to the revenue from other agencies revenue category of the Police
Department budget.
Presented byApproved as to form by
Courtney BarrettGlen R. Googins
Director of Human ResourcesCity Attorney
Glen R. Googins
City Attorney
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 192
RESOLUTION NO. __________
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE REVISED FISCAL YEAR
2015-2016COMPENSATION SCHEDULE AS REQUIRED BY
CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, TITLE 2, SECTION
570.5
WHEREAS, California Code of Regulations, Title 2, Section 570.5 requires that, for
purposes of determining a retiring employee's pension allowance, the pay rate be limited to the
amount listed on a pay schedule that meets certain requirements and be approved by the
governing body in accordance with the requirements of the applicable public meeting laws; and
WHEREAS, the Fiscal Year 2015-2016Compensation Schedule ("Compensation
Schedule") was approved by the City Council at their meeting ofJune 16, 2015; and
WHEREAS, any changes including but not limited to, across-the-board increases,
classification changes and salary adjustments approved subsequent to this date, will be reflected
on a revised Compensation Schedule and submitted to Council approval; and
WHEREAS, the Compensation Schedule will be revised to reflect the addition of the
Accounts Payable Supervisor, FA IVDC-LECC Executive Director, FA Senior Financial
Analyst, FA Financial Manager, Senior Electronics Technician, Intern (Undergraduate), Intern
(Graduate) position titlesand salaries; the removal of the CBAG IV-LECC Director, Intern I,
Intern II and Intern III position titles and salaries; the salary changes for Law Office Manager,
Principal Human Resources Analyst, Public Information Specialist and Senior Council Assistant;
and the bargaining unit change for Risk Management Specialist and Senior Risk Management
Specialist.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula
Vista, that it hereby does adopt the revised Fiscal Year 2015-2016Compensation Schedule as
required by California Code of Regulations, Title 2, Section 570.5.
Presented byApproved as to form by
Courtney BarrettGlen R. Googins
Director of Human ResourcesCity Attorney
Glen R. Googins
City Attorney
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 193
ORDINANCE NO.
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING
CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 2.05.010
RELATING TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF UNCLASSIFIED
POSITIONS TO ADD FA IVDC-LECC EXECUTIVE
DIRECTOR, FA FINANCIAL MANAGER AND FA SENIOR
FINANCIAL ANALYST AND DELETE CBAG IV-LECC
DIRECTOR (FIRST READING) (4/5 VOTE REQUIRED)
WHEREAS, the Human Resources Department has created new classifications to better
reflect the needs of the City’s workforce; and
WHEREAS, Chula Vista City Charter Section 500(a) requires that all new unclassified
management level positions be adopted by ordinance and a four-fifths vote of the Council.
NOW,THEREFORE,the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does ordain as follows:
Section I.
That Section 2.05.010 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code is hereby
amended to read as follows:
2.05.10Unclassified positions established.
In In addition to those unclassified positions specifically delineated in Section 500 of the Charter
of the City, there are established the unclassified positionsentitled: Administrative Secretary
(Mayor, At Will),Administrative Services Manager, Animal Care Facility Administrator,
Animal Care Facility Manager, Assistant Chief of Police, Assistant Director of Development
Services, Assistant Director of Engineering, Assistant Director of Human Resources, Assistant
Director of Finance, Assistant Director of Public Works, Assistant Director of Recreation,
Budget and Analysis Manager, Building Official/Code Enforcement Manager, California Border
Alliance Group (CBAG)Deputy Executive Director, CBAG Director –IV LECC, CBAG
Executive Director, Chief of Staff, City Engineer, Constituent Services Manager, Deputy City
Manager, Deputy Fire Chief, Development Services Department Director, Director of
Conservation and Environmental Services, Director of Economic Development, Fire Division
Chief, FA Accounting Technician, FA Administrative Analyst I, FA Administrative Analyst II,
FA Analyst, FA Director of San Diego Law Enforcement Coordination Center, FA Executive
Assistant, FA Financial Manager, FA Geospatial Intelligence Analyst, FA Graphics
Designer/Webmaster, FA Information Security Program Manager, FA IVDC-LECC Executive
Director, FA Law Enforcement Coordination Center Information Technology Manager, FA
Intelligence Analyst, FA Management Assistant, FA Microcomputer Specialist, FA Network
Administrator I, FA Network Administrator II, FA Program Analyst, FA Program Manager, FA
Network Engineer, FA Senior Financial Analyst, FA Senior Intelligence Analyst, FA Senior
Secretary, FA Supervisory Intelligence Analyst, Finance and Purchasing Manager, Housing
Manager, Human Resources Operations Manager, Information Technology Manager, Law Office
Manager, Office Specialist (Mayor’s Office), Performance and Organizational Development
Manager, Planning Manager, Police Administrative Services Administrator, Police Captain,
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 194
Ordinance No.
Page No. 2
Policy Aide, Purchasing Agent, Real Property Manager, Redevelopment and Housing Manager,
Risk Manager, Senior Council Assistant, Traffic Engineer, and Treasury and Business Manager.
Section II.Severability
If any portion of this Ordinance, or its application to any person or circumstance, is for
anyreason held to be invalid, unenforceable or unconstitutional, by a court of competent
jurisdiction, that portion shall be deemed severable, and such invalidity, unenforceability or
unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining portions of the
Ordinance, or its application to any other person or circumstance. The City Council of the City of
Chula Vista hereby declares that it would have adopted each section, sentence, clause or phrase
of this Ordinance, irrespective of the fact that any one or more other sections, sentences, clauses
or phrases of the Ordinance be declared invalid, unenforceable or unconstitutional.
Section III. Construction
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista intends this Ordinance to supplement, not to
duplicateor contradict, applicable state and federal law and this Ordinance shall be construed in
light ofthat intent.
Section IV. Effective Date
This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force on the thirtieth day after its final passage.
Section V. Publication
The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause
the same to be published or posted according to law.
Presented byApproved as to form by
Courtney BarrettGlen R. Googins
Director of Human ResourcesCity Attorney
Glen R. Googins
City Attorney
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 195
City of Chula Vista
Staff Report
File#:15-0389, Item#: 6.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA WAIVING THE
COMPETITIVE FORMAL BID REQUIREMENT AND APPROVING AN AGREEMENT WITH
HARRELL AND COMPANY ADVISORS, LLC TO PROVIDE FINANCIAL ADVISORY SERVICES
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Council adopt the resolution.
SUMMARY
TheFinanceDepartmenthasevaluatedtheeconomicfeasibilityofrefinancingthe2004and2006
CertificatesofParticipationthatwereusedtofinancetheconstructionofthefirsttwophasesofthe
CivicCenterconstructionandremodeling.HarrellandCompanyAdvisors,LLCwasthefinancial
advisorontheoriginalbondissuancesandisrecommendedtoassistinthefinancingplanthatwillbe
used to structure the refinancing.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
TheDevelopmentServicesDirectorhasreviewedtheproposedactivityforcompliancewiththe
CaliforniaEnvironmentalQualityAct(CEQA)andhasdeterminedthatproject,providingfinancial
advisoryservicesisnota“Project”asdefinedunderSection15378(b)(5)oftheStateCEQA
Guidelinesbecauseitisafiscalactivitythatwillnotresultinaphysicalchangetotheenvironment;
therefore,pursuanttoSection15060(b)(4)oftheStateCEQAGuidelinestheactionsproposedare
not subject to CEQA
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
Not applicable.
DISCUSSION
HarrellandCompanyAdvisors,LLC(“Harrell”)broughtforwardaproposalforrefundingthe2004and
2006CertificatesofParticipation(“COP”).Interestratesarestillnearhistoricallowsandthefinancial
market conditions appear favorable for a refinancing of the COPs.
Harrellhasservedinthepastasfinancialadvisorduringthetimeofissuanceofthe2004and2006
CertificatesofParticipationandunderstandsthefinancingplanthatwasusedtostructurethebonds.
SuzanneHarrell,thepresidentofthefirmhasservedasafinancialadvisortotheCityonthe2004,
2006and2010CertificatesofParticipationissuedforthethreeconstructionphasesoftheCivic
CenterComplexremodel.Morerecently,HarrellandCompanyservedasthefinancialadvisoronthe
2014RefundingCOPthatrefinancedthe2002COP.Inaddition,shehasservedasthefinancial
advisortotheformerRedevelopmentAgencyforissuanceofthe2006and2008refundingTax
Allocation Bonds.
ChulaVistaMunicipalCodeSection2.56.070(B)(3)authorizestheCityCouncilwaiveroftheformal
City of Chula VistaPage 1 of 2Printed on 7/16/2015
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 196
File#:15-0389, Item#: 6.
competitivebidprocess.AwaiverisrequestedforthisagreementbecauseHarrell’spriorexperience
withtheCityinissuingCOPsfortheCitygivesheranin-depthunderstandingofthefinancingplan
thatwasusedtostructurethebonds.ThisexperiencewillbecriticaltotheCity’sabilitytomove
forwardexpeditiouslywiththerefunding.Assuch,theCity’sinterestswouldbemateriallybetter
servedbywaivingthecompetitivebidprocessandawardingthecontracttoHarrellbecauseitwill
allowtheCitytotakeadvantageofthecurrentmarketconditions.CityCouncilapproved
considerationoftherefinancingofthe2004and2006COPsattheJune16,2015meeting.Dueto
anadministrativeoversight,theagreementforHarrellandCompanywasnotbroughtforwardatthe
same time.
DECISION-MAKER CONFLICT
Staffhasreviewedthedecisioncontemplatedbythisactionandhasdeterminedthatitisnotsite
specificandconsequently,the500-footrulefoundinCaliforniaCodeofRegulationssection18704.2
(a)(1)isnotapplicabletothisdecision.Staffisnotindependentlyaware,norhasstaffbeeninformed
byanyCityCouncilmember,ofanyotherfactthatmayconstituteabasisforadecisionmakerconflict
of interest in this matter.
LINK TO STRATEGIC GOALS
TheCity’sStrategicPlanhasfivemajorgoals:OperationalExcellence,EconomicVitality,Healthy
Community,StrongandSecureNeighborhoodsandaConnectedCommunity.Theapprovalofthe
agreementsupportstheEconomicVitalitygoalbyloweringinterestratesandthereforethecostof
borrowing for the General Fund and Public Facilities Development Impact Fee Fund.
CURRENT YEAR FISCAL IMPACT
Totalfeeschargedaretobe$60,000.Thefeesarecontingentuponthebondrefundingbeing
completed.Thefeeiscomposedofafinancialadvisorfeeof$50,000and$10,000forpreparationof
theOfficialStatementforthebondrefunding.Thefeewillbepaidaspartofthecostsofissuingthe
bonds.Iftherefundingofthebondsisdeterminedtobeeconomicallyinfeasibleoriftherefundingis
notcompletedforanyreasonthenneitherthefinancialadvisorfeenorthepreparationfeewillbe
charged.
ThereisnoGeneralFundimpactrelatedtoapprovingthisagreement.However,thepotential
savingsfromtherefunding,ifcompleted,willbenefittheGeneralFundandPublicFacilities
Development Impact Fee Fund.
ONGOING FISCAL IMPACT
There is no ongoing fiscal impact as a result of approving this agreement.
ATTACHMENTS
Harrell and Company Agreement
Staff Contact: Phillip Davis, Assistant Director, Finance Department
City of Chula VistaPage 2 of 2Printed on 7/16/2015
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 197
COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. __________
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA WAIVING THE COMPETITIVE FORMAL BID
REQUIREMENT AND APPROVING AN AGREEMENT WITH
HARRELL AND COMPANY ADVISORS, LLCTO PROVIDE
FINANCIAL ADVISORY SERVICES
WHEREAS, Harrell and Company Advisors, LLC brought forward a proposal, to the
Director of Finance, for refunding the 2004 and 2006Certificates of Participation, and;
WHEREAS,interest rates are still near historical lows and the financial market
conditions appear favorable for a refunding of the COPs,and;
WHEREAS, Chula Vista Municipal Code Section 2.56.070 (B) (3) authorizes the City
Council waiver of the formal competitive bid process, and;
WHEREAS, awaiver is requested for this agreement because Harrell and Company
Advisors, LLC has served in the past as financial advisor during the time of issuance of the 2004
and 2006 Certificates of Participation and understands the financing plan that was used to
structure the bonds, and;
WHEREAS, if it is determined that the refunding is economically feasibility, the City’s
interests would be materially better served by waiving the competitive bid process and awarding
the contract to Harrell because it will allow the City tomove forward expeditiously andtake
advantage ofcurrent market conditions; and
WHEREAS, the agreed-upon fee of $60,000 is contingent on the 2004 and 2006
Certificates of Participation being refunded, and;
WHEREAS, if the bonds are not refunded then the fee will not be paid.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula
Vista, that it approves the agreement between the City and Harrell and Company Advisors, LLC
to provide financial advisory services for a potentialrefunding of the 2004 and 206Certificates
of Participation, in the form presented to the City Council, with such minor modifications as may
be required or approved by the City Attorney, a copy of which is on file in the Office of the City
Clerk, and authorizes and directs the Mayorto execute the agreement.
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 198
Resolution No. _________
Page 2
Presented byApproved as to form by
Maria KachadoorianGlen R. Googins
Deputy City Manager/CFOCity Attorney
C:\\Users\\GRANIC~1\\AppData\\Local\\Temp\\BCL Technologies\\easyPDF 7\\@BCL@94051B92\\@BCL@94051B92.docx
5/31/2013 8:18 AM
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 199
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 200
15015
ACN:
Agreement between
City of Chula Vista
And
Harrell & Company Advisors, LLC
For Financial Advisory Services
This agreement (Agreement), effective May 1, 2015, is between the City-related entity whose
name and business form is indicated on Exhibit A, Paragraph 2, (City), and the entity whose
name, business form, place of business and telephone numbers are indicated on Exhibit A,
Paragraphs 4 through 6, (Consultant), and is made with reference to the following facts:
R
ECITALS
Harrell and Company Advisors, LLC
WHEREAS, approached the City with a bond
refunding opportunity, and
WHEREAS,the 2004 and 2006 Certificates of Participation bonds were issued to finance
construction and remodeling of the Civic Center Phases 1 and 2 and are now considered to be a
candidate for a refunding; and
WHEREAS, the current interest rate environment would provide an opportunity to refund
all or some of the 2004 and 2006 Certificates of Participation bond issuances for savings that
would make the refunding financially feasible when considering the costs of issuance, and
WHEREAS, the City has determined that the City’s interests would be materially better
served by waiving its formal competitive bid process in selecting Consultant because
Consultant’s prior experience with the City in issuing COPs for the City gives Consultant an in-
depth understanding of the financing plan that was used to structure the bonds, which will be
critical to the City’s ability to move forward expeditiously with the refunding, thus allowing the
City to take advantage of the current market conditions, and
WHEREAS, Consultant warrants and represents that it is experienced and staffed in a
manner such that it can deliver the services required of Consultant to City in accordance with the
time frames and the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
\[End of Recitals. Next Page Starts Obligatory Provisions.\]
Page 1
Two Party Agreement Between the City of Chula Vista and Harrell and Company Advisors, LLC for financial advisory services
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 201
S:\\Suzanne's Documents\\Client Admin\\Chula Vista\\2015 COP Refunding\\Harrell and Company Agreement - 2015 COP Refunding.docx
15015
ACN:
OPP
BLIGATORY ROVISIONS AGES
NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration the City and Consultant do hereby mutually
agree as follows:
All of the Recitals above are incorporated into this Agreement by this reference.
ARTICLE I. CONSULTANT’S OBLIGATIONS
General
A.
1. General Duties. Consultant shall perform all of the services described on Exhibit A,
Paragraph 7 (General Duties).
2. Scope of Work and Schedule. In performing and delivering the General Duties,
Consultant shall also perform the services, and deliver to City the “Deliverables”
described in Exhibit A, Paragraph 8, entitled “Scope of Work and Schedule,” according
to, and within the time frames set forth in Exhibit A, Paragraph 8, time being of the
essence of this agreement. The General Duties and the work and Deliverables required in
the Scope of Work and Schedule shall be referred to as the “Defined Services.” Failure to
complete the Defined Services by the times indicated does not, except at the option of the
City, terminate this Agreement.
a.Reductions in Scope of Work.City may independently, or upon request from
Consultant, from time to time, reduce the Defined Services to be performed by the
Consultant under this Agreement. Upon doing so, City and Consultant agree to meet
in good faith and confer for the purpose of negotiating a corresponding reduction in
the compensation associated with the reduction.
b.Additional Services.In addition to performing the Defined Services, City may
require Consultant to perform additional consulting services related to the Defined
Services (Additional Services), and upon doing so in writing, if they are within the
scope of services offered by Consultant, Consultant shall perform same on a time and
materials basis at the rates set forth in the “Rate Schedule” in Exhibit A,
Paragraph 10(C), unless a separate fixed fee is otherwise agreed upon. All
compensation for Additional Services shall be paid monthly as billed.
3.Standard of Care. The Consultant expressly warrants that the work to be performed
pursuant to this Agreement, whether Defined Services or Additional Services, shall be
performed in accordance with the standard of care ordinarily exercised by members of
the profession currently practicing under similar conditions and in similar locations.
a.No Waiver of Standard of Care. Where approval by City is required, it is understood
to be conceptual approval only and does not relieve the Consultant of responsibility
for complying with all laws, codes, industry standards, and liability for damages
caused by negligent acts, errors, omissions, noncompliance with industry standards,
or the willful misconduct of the Consultant or its subcontractors.
Page 2
Two Party Agreement Between the City of Chula Vista and Harrell and Company Advisors, LLC for financial advisory services
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 202
S:\\Suzanne's Documents\\Client Admin\\Chula Vista\\2015 COP Refunding\\Harrell and Company Agreement - 2015 COP Refunding.docx
15015
ACN:
Application of Laws.
B. Should a federal or state law pre-empt a local law, or regulation, the
Consultant must comply with the federal or state law and implementing regulations. No
provision of this Agreement requires the Consultant to observe or enforce compliance with
any provision, perform any other act, or do any other thing in contravention of federal, state,
territorial, or local law, regulation, or ordinance. If compliance with any provision of this
Agreement violates or would require the Consultant to violate any law, the Consultant agrees
to notify City immediately in writing. Should this occur, the City and the Consultant agree
that they will make appropriate arrangements to proceed with or, if necessary, amend or
terminate this Agreement, or portions of it, expeditiously.
1. Subcontractors. Consultant agrees to take appropriate measures necessary to ensure that
all participants utilized by the Consultant to complete its obligations under this
Agreement, such as subcontractors, comply with all applicable laws, regulations,
ordinances, and policies, whether federal, state, or local, affecting Project
implementation. In addition, if a subcontractor is expected to fulfill any responsibilities of
the Consultant under this Agreement, the Consultant shall ensure that the subcontractor
carries out the Consultant’s responsibilities as set forth in this Agreement.
Insurance
C.
1. General. Consultant must procure and maintain, during the period of performance of this
Agreement, and for twelve months after completion, policies of insurance from insurance
companies to protect against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property that
may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work under this Agreement
and the results of that work by the Consultant, his agents, representatives, employees or
subcontractors, and provide documentation of same prior to commencement of work.
2. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage must be at least as broad as:
a.CGL. Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (occurrence
Form CG0001).
b.Auto. Insurance Services Office Form Number CA 0001 covering Automobile
Liability, Code 1 (any auto).
WC. Workers’ Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and
c.
Employer’s Liability Insurance.
E&O. Professional Liability or Errors & Omissions Liability insurance appropriate to
d.
the Consultant’s profession. Architects’ and Engineers’ coverage is to be endorsed to
include contractual liability.
3. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant must maintain limits no less than those
included in the table below:
Page 3
Two Party Agreement Between the City of Chula Vista and Harrell and Company Advisors, LLC for financial advisory services
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 203
S:\\Suzanne's Documents\\Client Admin\\Chula Vista\\2015 COP Refunding\\Harrell and Company Agreement - 2015 COP Refunding.docx
15015
ACN:
i. General Liability: $1,000,000per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury,
(Including(including death), and property damage. If Commercial General
operations,Liability insurance with a general aggregate limit is used, either
products and the general aggregate limit must apply separately to this
completed Project/location or the general aggregate limit must be twice the
operations, as required occurrence limit. Coverage shall also include Hired
applicable) and Non-Owned Auto Liability coverage.
ii. Automobile Not required
Liability:
iii. Workers’ Statutory
Compensation $1,000,000each accident
Employer’s $1,000,000 disease-policy limit
Liability: $1,000,000 disease-each employee
iv. Professional $1,000,000each occurrence
Liability or Errors
& Omissions
Liability:
If the Consultant maintains higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City requires
and shall be entitled to coverage for the higher limits maintained by the Consultant.
4. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must
be declared to and approved by the City. At the option of the City, either the insurer will
reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as they pertain to the City,
its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Consultant will provide a financial
guarantee satisfactory to the City guaranteeing payment of losses and related
investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses.
5. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability, automobile liability, and where
appropriate, the worker’s compensation policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain,
the following provisions:
a.Additional Insureds. City of Chula Vista, its officers, officials, employees, agents,
and volunteers are to be named as additional insureds with respect to all policies of
insurance, including those with respect to liability arising out of automobiles owned,
leased, hired or borrowed by or on behalf of the Consultant, where applicable, and,
with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of
the Consultant, including providing materials, parts or equipment furnished in
connection with such work or operations. The general liability additional insured
coverage must be provided in the form of an endorsement to the Consultant’s
insurance using ISO CG 2010 (11/85) or its equivalent. Specifically, the endorsement
must not exclude Products/Completed Operations coverage.
Page 4
Two Party Agreement Between the City of Chula Vista and Harrell and Company Advisors, LLC for financial advisory services
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 204
S:\\Suzanne's Documents\\Client Admin\\Chula Vista\\2015 COP Refunding\\Harrell and Company Agreement - 2015 COP Refunding.docx
15015
ACN:
b.Primary Insurance. The Consultant’s General Liability insurance coverage must be
primary insurance as it pertains to the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents,
and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its officers,
officials, employees, or volunteers is wholly separate from the insurance of the
Consultant and in no way relieves the Consultant from its responsibility to provide
insurance.
c.Cancellation.The insurance policies required by this Agreement shall not be canceled
by either party, except after thirty days’ prior written notice to the City by certified
mail, return receipt requested. The words “will endeavor” and “but failure to mail
such notice shall impose no obligation or liability of any kind upon the company, its
agents, or representatives” shall be deleted from all certificates.
d.Waiver of Subrogation. Consultant’s insurer will provide a Waiver of Subrogation in
favor of the City for each required policy providing coverage for the term required by
this Agreement. In addition, Consultant waives any right it may have or may obtain
to subrogation for a claim against the City.
6. Claims Forms. If General Liability, Pollution and/or Asbestos Pollution Liability and/or
Errors & Omissions coverage are written on a claims-made form:
a. Retro Date. The “Retro Date” must be shown, and must be before the date of the
Agreement or the beginning of the work required by the Agreement.
b.Maintenance and Evidence. Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance
must be provided for at least five years after completion of the work required by the
Agreement.
c.Cancellation. If coverage is canceled or non-renewed, and not replaced with another
claims-made policy form with a “Retro Date” prior to the effective date of the
Agreement, the Consultant must purchase “extended reporting” coverage for a
minimum of five years after completion of the work required by the Agreement.
d.Copies. A copy of the claims reporting requirements must be submitted to the City
for review.
7. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with licensed insurers admitted to
transact business in the State of California with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less
than A V. If insurance is placed with a surplus lines insurer, insurer must be listed on the
State of California List of Eligible Surplus Lines Insurers (LESLI) with a current A.M.
Best’s rating of no less than A X. Exception may be made for the State Compensation
Fund when not specifically rated.
8. Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish the City with original certificates and
amendatory endorsements effecting coverage required by Section I.C. of this Agreement.
Page 5
Two Party Agreement Between the City of Chula Vista and Harrell and Company Advisors, LLC for financial advisory services
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 205
S:\\Suzanne's Documents\\Client Admin\\Chula Vista\\2015 COP Refunding\\Harrell and Company Agreement - 2015 COP Refunding.docx
15015
ACN:
The endorsements should be on insurance industry forms, provided those endorsements
or policies conform to the requirements of this Agreement. All certificates and
endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. The
City reserves the right to require, at any time, complete, certified copies of all required
insurance policies, including endorsements evidencing the coverage required by these
specifications.
9.Subcontractors. Consultant must include all subconsultants as insureds under its policies
or furnish separate certificates and endorsements for each subconsultant. All coverage for
subconsultants is subject to all of the requirements included in these specifications.
10.Not a Limitation of Other Obligations. Insurance provisions under this Article shall not
be construed to limit the Consultant’s obligations under this Agreement, including
Indemnity.
11.Additional Coverage. To the extent that Insurance coverage exceeds the minimums
identified in section 3, recovery shall not be limited to the insurance minimums, but shall
instead extend to the actual policy limits.
Security for Performance
D.
1.Performance Bond. In the event that Exhibit A, at Paragraph 18, indicates the need for
Consultant to provide a Performance Bond (indicated by a check mark in the
parenthetical space immediately preceding the subparagraph entitled “Performance
Bond”), then Consultant shall provide to the City a performance bond, in the amount
indicated at Exhibit A, Paragraph 18, in the form prescribed by the City and by such
sureties which are authorized to transact such business in the State of California, listed as
approved by the United States Department of Treasury Circular 570,
http://www.fms.treas.gov/c570, and whose underwriting limitation is sufficient to issue
bonds in the amount required by the Agreement, and which also satisfy the requirements
stated in Section 995.660 of the Code of Civil Procedure, except as provided otherwise
by laws or regulations. All bonds signed by an agent must be accompanied by a certified
copy of such agent’s authority to act. Surety companies must be duly licensed or
authorized in the jurisdiction in which the Project is located to issue bonds for the limits
so required. Form must be satisfactory to the Risk Manager or City.
2. Letter of Credit. In the event that Exhibit A, at Paragraph 18, indicates the need for
Consultant to provide a Letter of Credit (indicated by a check mark in the parenthetical
space immediately preceding the subparagraph entitled “Letter of Credit”), then
Consultant shall provide to the City an irrevocable letter of credit callable by the City at
its unfettered discretion by submitting to the bank a letter, signed by the City Manager,
stating that the Consultant is in breach of the terms of this Agreement. The letter of
credit shall be issued by a bank, and be in a form and amount satisfactory to the Risk
Manager or City Attorney which amount is indicated in the space adjacent to the term,
“Letter of Credit,” in Exhibit A, Paragraph 18.
Page 6
Two Party Agreement Between the City of Chula Vista and Harrell and Company Advisors, LLC for financial advisory services
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 206
S:\\Suzanne's Documents\\Client Admin\\Chula Vista\\2015 COP Refunding\\Harrell and Company Agreement - 2015 COP Refunding.docx
15015
ACN:
3. Other Security. In the event that Exhibit A, at Paragraph 18, indicates the need for
Consultant to provide security other than a Performance Bond or a Letter of Credit
(indicated by a check mark in the parenthetical space immediately preceding the
subparagraph entitled “Other Security”), then Consultant shall provide to the City such
other security therein listed in a form and amount satisfactory to the Risk Manager or
City Attorney.
Business License
E.. Consultant agrees to obtain a business license from the City and to
otherwise comply with Title 5 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code.
ARTICLE II. CITY OBLIGATIONS
Consultation and Cooperation
A.. City shall regularly consult the Consultant for the purpose
of reviewing the progress of the Defined Services and Schedule, and to provide direction and
guidance to achieve the objectives of this Agreement. The City shall allow Consultant access
to its office facilities, files and records, as deemed necessary and appropriate by the City,
throughout the term of this Agreement. In addition, City agrees to provide the materials
identified at Exhibit A, Paragraph 9, with the understanding that delay in the provision of
those materials beyond thirty days after authorization to proceed, shall constitute a basis for
the justifiable delay in the Consultant's performance.
Compensation.
B.
1. Following Receipt of Billing. Upon receipt of a properly prepared bill from Consultant,
submitted to the City as indicated in Exhibit A, Paragraph 17, but in no event more
frequently than monthly, on the day of the period indicated in Exhibit A, Paragraph 17,
City shall compensate Consultant for all services rendered by Consultant according to the
terms and conditions set forth in Exhibit A, Paragraph 10, adjacent to the governing
compensation relationship indicated by a "checkmark" next to the appropriate
arrangement, subject to the requirements for retention set forth in Paragraph 18 of
Exhibit A, and shall compensate Consultant for out of pocket expenses as provided in
Exhibit A, Paragraph 11.
2. Supporting Information. Any billing submitted by Consultant shall contain sufficient
information as to the propriety of the billing, including properly executed payrolls, time
records, invoices, contracts, or vouchers describing in detail the nature of the charges to
the Project in order to permit the City to evaluate that the amount due and payable is
proper, and such billing shall specifically contain the City's account number indicated on
Exhibit A, Paragraph 17(C) to be charged upon making such payment.
3.Exclusions. In determining the amount of the compensation City will exclude any cost:
1) incurred prior to the effective date of this Agreement; or 2) arising out of or related to
the errors, omissions, negligence or acts of willful misconduct of the Consultant, its
agents, employees, or subcontractors.
Page 7
Two Party Agreement Between the City of Chula Vista and Harrell and Company Advisors, LLC for financial advisory services
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 207
S:\\Suzanne's Documents\\Client Admin\\Chula Vista\\2015 COP Refunding\\Harrell and Company Agreement - 2015 COP Refunding.docx
15015
ACN:
a.Errors and Omissions. In the event that the City Administrator determines that
the Consultant’s negligence, errors, or omissions in the performance of work
under this Agreement has resulted in expense to City greater than would have
resulted if there were no such negligence, errors, omissions, Consultant shall
reimburse City for any additional expenses incurred by the City. Nothing in this
paragraph is intended to limit City's rights under other provisions of this
Agreement.
4. Payment Not Final Approval. The Consultant understands and agrees that payment to the
Consultant for any Project cost does not constitute a City final decision about whether
that cost is allowable and eligible for payment under the Project and does not constitute a
waiver of any violation of Consultant of the terms of the Agreement. The Consultant
acknowledges that City will not make a final determination about the eligibility of any
cost until the final payment has been made on the Project or the results of an audit of the
Project requested by the City has been completed, whichever occurs latest. If City
determines that the Consultant is not entitled to receive any portion of the compensation
due or paid, City will notify the Consultant in writing, stating its reasons. The Consultant
agrees that Project closeout will not alter the Consultant’s responsibility to return any
funds due City as a result of later refunds, corrections, or other similar transactions; nor
will Project closeout alter the right of City to disallow costs and recover funds provided
for the Project on the basis of a later audit or other review.
a.Consultant’s Obligation to Pay. Upon notification to the Consultant that specific
amounts are owed to City, whether for excess payments or disallowed costs, the
Consultant agrees to remit to City promptly the amounts owed, including applicable
interest.
ARTICLE III. ETHICS
Financial Interests of Consultant
A.
1. Consultant is Designated as an FPPC Filer. If Consultant is designated on Exhibit A,
Paragraph 14, as an “FPPC filer,” Consultant is deemed to be a “Consultant” for the
purposes of the Political Reform Act conflict of interest and disclosure provisions, and
shall report economic interests to the City Clerk on the required Statement of Economic
Interests in such reporting categories as are specified in Paragraph 14 of Exhibit A, or if
none are specified, then as determined by the City Attorney.
2. No Participation in Decision. Regardless of whether Consultant is designated as an FPPC
Filer, Consultant shall not make, or participate in making or in any way attempt to use
Consultant's position to influence a governmental decision in which Consultant knows or
has reason to know Consultant has a financial interest other than the compensation
promised by this Agreement.
3. Search to Determine Economic Interests. Regardless of whether Consultant is designated
as an FPPC Filer, Consultant warrants and represents that Consultant has diligently
Page 8
Two Party Agreement Between the City of Chula Vista and Harrell and Company Advisors, LLC for financial advisory services
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 208
S:\\Suzanne's Documents\\Client Admin\\Chula Vista\\2015 COP Refunding\\Harrell and Company Agreement - 2015 COP Refunding.docx
15015
ACN:
conducted a search and inventory of Consultant's economic interests, as the term is used
in the regulations promulgated by the Fair Political Practices Commission, and has
determined that Consultant does not, to the best of Consultant's knowledge, have an
economic interest which would conflict with Consultant's duties under this Agreement.
4. Promise Not to Acquire Conflicting Interests. Regardless of whether Consultant is
designated as an FPPC Filer, Consultant further warrants and represents that Consultant
will not acquire, obtain, or assume an economic interest during the term of this
Agreement which would constitute a conflict of interest as prohibited by the Fair Political
Practices Act.
5. Duty to Advise of Conflicting Interests. Regardless of whether Consultant is designated
as an FPPC Filer, Consultant further warrants and represents that Consultant will
immediately advise the City Attorney if Consultant learns of an economic interest of
Consultant's that may result in a conflict of interest for the purpose of the Fair Political
Practices Act, and regulations promulgated thereunder.
6.Specific Warranties Against Economic Interests. Consultant warrants, represents and
agrees that:
a. Neither Consultant, nor Consultant's immediate family members, nor Consultant's
employees or agents (Consultant Associates) presently have any interest, directly or
indirectly, whatsoever in any property which may be the subject matter of the Defined
Services, or in any property within 2 radial miles from the exterior boundaries of any
property which may be the subject matter of the Defined Services, (Prohibited
Interest), other than as listed in Exhibit A, Paragraph 14.
b. No promise of future employment, remuneration, consideration, gratuity or other
reward or gain has been made to Consultant or Consultant Associates in connection
with Consultant's performance of this Agreement. Consultant promises to advise City
of any such promise that may be made during the Term of this Agreement, or for
twelve months thereafter.
c. Consultant Associates shall not acquire any such Prohibited Interest within the Term
of this Agreement, or for twelve months after the expiration of this Agreement,
except with the written permission of City.
d. Consultant may not conduct or solicit any business for any party to this Agreement,
or for any third party that may be in conflict with Consultant's responsibilities under
this Agreement, except with the written permission of City.
IV. LIQUIDATED DAMAGES
Application of Section
A.. The provisions of this section apply if a Liquidated Damages Rate
is provided in Exhibit A, Paragraph 13.
Page 9
Two Party Agreement Between the City of Chula Vista and Harrell and Company Advisors, LLC for financial advisory services
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 209
S:\\Suzanne's Documents\\Client Admin\\Chula Vista\\2015 COP Refunding\\Harrell and Company Agreement - 2015 COP Refunding.docx
15015
ACN:
1. Estimating Damages. It is acknowledged by both parties that time is of the essence in the
completion of this Agreement. It is difficult to estimate the amount of damages resulting
from delay in performance. The parties have used their judgment to arrive at a reasonable
amount to compensate for delay.
2. Amount of Penalty. Failure to complete the Defined Services within the allotted time
period specified in this Agreement shall result in the following penalty: For each
consecutive calendar day in excess of the time specified for the completion of the
respective work assignment or Deliverable, the Consultant shall pay to the City, or have
withheld from monies due, the sum of Liquidated Damages Rate provided in Exhibit A,
Paragraph 13 (Liquidated Damages Rate).
3. Request for Extension of Time. If the performance of any act required of Consultant is
directly prevented or delayed by reason of strikes, lockouts, labor disputes, unusual
governmental delays, acts of God, fire, floods, epidemics, freight embargoes, or other
causes beyond the reasonable control of the Consultant, as determined by the City,
Consultant shall be excused from performing that act for the period of time equal to the
period of time of the prevention or delay. In the event Consultant claims the existence of
such a delay, the Consultant shall notify the City's Contract Administrator, or designee, in
writing of that fact within ten calendar days after the beginning of any such claimed
delay. Extensions of time will not be granted for delays to minor portions of work unless
it can be shown that such delays did or will delay the progress of the work.
ARTICLE V. INDEMNIFICATION
Defense, Indemnity, and Hold Harmless
A..
1. General Requirement. To the maximum extent allowed by law, Consultant shall defend,
indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City, its elected and appointed officers, agents
and employees, from and against any and all claims, demands, causes of action, costs,
expenses, (including reasonable attorney’s fees and actual costs), liability, loss, damage
or injury, in law or equity, to property or persons, including wrongful death, in any
manner arising out of or incident to any alleged acts, omissions, negligence, or willful
misconduct of Consultant, its officials, officers, employees, agents, and contractors,
arising out of or in connection with the performance of the Defined Services, the results
of such performance, or this Agreement. This indemnity provision does not include any
claims, damages, liability, costs and expenses arising from the sole negligence or sole
willful misconduct of the City, its officers, employees. Also covered is liability arising
from, connected with, caused by or claimed to be caused by the active or passive
negligent acts or omissions of the City, its agents, officers, or employees which may be in
combination with the active or passive negligent acts or omissions of the Consultant, its
employees, agents or officers, or any third party.
2. Design Professional Services. Notwithstanding the forgoing, if the services provided
under this Agreement are design professional services, as defined by California Civil
Code section 2782.5, as may be amended from time to time, the defense and indemnity
Page 10
Two Party Agreement Between the City of Chula Vista and Harrell and Company Advisors, LLC for financial advisory services
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 210
S:\\Suzanne's Documents\\Client Admin\\Chula Vista\\2015 COP Refunding\\Harrell and Company Agreement - 2015 COP Refunding.docx
15015
ACN:
obligation under Section 1, above, shall be limited to the extent required by California
Civil Code section 2782.8.
3.Costs of Defense and Award. Included in the obligations in Sections A.1 and A.2, above,
is the Consultant’s obligation to defend, at Consultant’s own cost, expense and risk, any
and all suits, actions or other legal proceedings, that may be brought or instituted against
the City, its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents and/or volunteers, subject to
the limitations in Sections A.1. and A.2. Subject to the limitations in Sections A.1. and
A.2., Consultant shall pay and satisfy any judgment, award or decree that may be
rendered against City or its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents and/or
volunteers, for any and all related legal expenses and costs incurred by each of them.
4. Insurance Proceeds. Consultant’s obligation to indemnify shall not be restricted to
insurance proceeds, if any, received by the City, its directors, officials, officers,
employees, agents, and/or volunteers.
5. Declarations. Consultant’s obligations under Article V shall not be limited by any prior
or subsequent declaration by the Consultant.
6. Enforcement Costs. Consultant agrees to pay any and all costs City incurs enforcing the
indemnity and defense provisions set forth in Article V.
7.Survival. Consultant’s obligations under Article V shall survive the termination of this
Agreement.
8.No Alteration of Other Obligations. This Article V, shall in no way alter, affect or
modify any of the Consultant’s other obligations and duties under this Agreement.
ARTICLE VI. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT
Termination for Cause
A.. If, through any cause, Consultant shall fail to fulfill in a timely and
proper manner Consultant's obligations under this Agreement, or if Consultant shall violate
any of the covenants, agreements or stipulations of this Agreement, City shall have the right
to terminate this Agreement by giving written notice to Consultant of such termination and
specifying the effective date thereof at least five (5) days before the effective date of such
termination. In that event, all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, surveys,
drawings, maps, reports and other materials prepared by Consultant shall, at the option of the
City, become the property of the City, and Consultant shall be entitled to receive just and
equitable compensation, in an amount not to exceed that payable under this Agreement and
less any damages caused City by Consultant's breach, for any work satisfactorily completed
on such documents and other materials up to the effective date of Notice of Termination.
Termination of Agreement for Convenience of City
B.. City may terminate this Agreement
at any time and for any reason, by giving specific written notice to Consultant of such
termination and specifying the effective date thereof, at least thirty (30) days before the
effective date of such termination. In that event, all finished and unfinished documents and
Page 11
Two Party Agreement Between the City of Chula Vista and Harrell and Company Advisors, LLC for financial advisory services
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 211
S:\\Suzanne's Documents\\Client Admin\\Chula Vista\\2015 COP Refunding\\Harrell and Company Agreement - 2015 COP Refunding.docx
15015
ACN:
other materials described hereinabove shall, at the option of the City, become City's sole and
exclusive property. If the Agreement is terminated by City as provided in this paragraph,
Consultant shall be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation, in an amount not to
exceed that payable under this Agreement, for any satisfactory work completed on such
documents and other materials to the effective date of such termination. Consultant hereby
expressly waives any and all claims for damages or compensation arising under this
Agreement except as set forth in this section.
ARTICLE VII. RECORD RETENTION AND ACCESS
Record Retention
A.. During the course of the Project and for three (3) years following
completion, the Consultant agrees to maintain, intact and readily accessible, all data,
documents, reports, records, contracts, and supporting materials relating to the Project as City
may require.
Access to Records of Consultant and Subcontractors
B.. The Consultant agrees to permit,
and require its subcontractors to permit City or its authorized representatives, upon request,
to inspect all Project work, materials, payrolls, and other data, and to audit the books,
records, and accounts of the Contractor and its subcontractors pertaining to the Project.
Project Closeout
C.. The Consultant agrees that Project closeout does not alter the reporting
and record retention requirements of this Agreement.
ARTICLE VIII. PROJECT COMPLETION, AUDIT, AND CLOSEOUT
Project Completion
A.. Within ninety (90) calendar days following Project completion or
termination by City, Consultant agrees to submit a final certification of Project expenses and
audit reports, as applicable.
Audit of Consultants
B.. Consultant agrees to perform financial and compliance audits the
City may require. The Consultant also agrees to obtain any other audits required by City.
Consultant agrees that Project closeout will not alter Consultant's audit responsibilities. Audit
costs are allowable Project costs.
Project Closeout
C.. Project closeout occurs when City notifies the Consultant that City has
closed the Project, and either forwards the final payment or acknowledges that the Consultant
has remitted the proper refund. The Consultant agrees that Project closeout by City does not
invalidate any continuing requirements imposed by the Agreement or any unmet
requirements set forth in a written notification from City
ARTICLE IX. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
Assignability
A.. The services of Consultant are personal to the City, and Consultant shall not
assign any interest in this Agreement, and shall not transfer any interest in the same (whether
by assignment or notation), without prior written consent of City.
Page 12
Two Party Agreement Between the City of Chula Vista and Harrell and Company Advisors, LLC for financial advisory services
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 212
S:\\Suzanne's Documents\\Client Admin\\Chula Vista\\2015 COP Refunding\\Harrell and Company Agreement - 2015 COP Refunding.docx
15015
ACN:
1. Limited Consent. City hereby consents to the assignment of the portions of the Defined
Services identified in Exhibit A, Paragraph 16 to the subconsultants identified as
“Permitted Subconsultants.”
Ownership, Publication, Reproduction and Use of Material
B.. All reports, studies,
information, data, statistics, forms, designs, plans, procedures, systems and any other
materials or properties produced under this Agreement shall be the sole and exclusive
property of City. No such materials or properties produced in whole or in part under this
Agreement shall be subject to private use, copyrights or patent rights by Consultant in the
United States or in any other country without the express written consent of City. City shall
have unrestricted authority to publish, disclose (except as may be limited by the provisions of
the Public Records Act), distribute, and otherwise use, copyright or patent, in whole or in
part, any such reports, studies, data, statistics, forms or other materials or properties produced
under this Agreement.
Independent Contractor
C.. City is interested only in the results obtained and Consultant shall
perform as an independent contractor with sole control of the manner and means of
performing the services required under this Agreement. City maintains the right only to
reject or accept Consultant's work products. Consultant and any of the Consultant's agents,
employees or representatives are, for all purposes under this Agreement, independent
contractors and shall not be deemed to be employees of City, and none of them shall be
entitled to any benefits to which City employees are entitled including but not limited to,
overtime, retirement benefits, worker's compensation benefits, injury leave or other leave
benefits. Therefore, City will not withhold state or federal income tax, social security tax or
any other payroll tax, and Consultant shall be solely responsible for the payment of same and
shall hold the City harmless with regard to them.
1. Actions on Behalf of City. Except as City may specify in writing, Consultant shall have
no authority, express or implied, to act on behalf of City in any capacity whatsoever, as
an agent or otherwise. Consultant shall have no authority, express or implied, to bind
City or its members, agents, or employees, to any obligation whatsoever, unless expressly
provided in this Agreement.
2. No Obligations to Third Parties. In connection with the Project, Consultant agrees and
shall require that its agents, employees, subcontractors agree that City shall not be
responsible for any obligations or liabilities to any third party, including its agents,
employees, subcontractors, or other person or entity that is not a party to this Agreement.
Notwithstanding that City may have concurred in or approved any solicitation,
subagreement, or third party contract at any tier, City shall have no obligation or liability
to any person or entity not a party to this Agreement.
Administrative Claims Requirements and Procedures
D.. No suit or arbitration shall be
brought arising out of this Agreement, against City unless a claim has first been presented in
writing and filed with City and acted upon by City in accordance with the procedures set
forth in Chapter 1.34 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, as same may from time to time be
amended, the provisions of which are incorporated by this reference as if fully set forth
Page 13
Two Party Agreement Between the City of Chula Vista and Harrell and Company Advisors, LLC for financial advisory services
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 213
S:\\Suzanne's Documents\\Client Admin\\Chula Vista\\2015 COP Refunding\\Harrell and Company Agreement - 2015 COP Refunding.docx
15015
ACN:
herein, and such policies and procedures used by City in the implementation of same. Upon
request by City, Consultant shall meet and confer in good faith with City for the purpose of
resolving any dispute over the terms of this Agreement.
Administration of Contract
E.. Each party designates the individuals (Contract
Administrators) indicated on Exhibit A, Paragraph 12, as that party's contract administrator
who is authorized by the party to represent it in the routine administration of this Agreement.
Term
F.. This Agreement shall terminate when the parties have complied with all executory
provisions hereof.
Statement of Costs
G.. In the event that Consultant prepares a report or document, or
participates in the preparation of a report or document in performing the Defined Services,
Consultant shall include, or cause the inclusion of, in the report or document, a statement of
the numbers and cost in dollar amounts of all contracts and subcontracts relating to the
preparation of the report or document.
Consultant is Real Estate Broker and/or Salesman
H.. If the box on Exhibit A, Paragraph 15
is marked, the Consultant and/or its principals is/are licensed with the State of California or
some other state as a real estate broker or salesperson. Otherwise, Consultant represents that
neither Consultant, nor its principals are licensed real estate brokers or salespersons.
Notices
I.. All notices, demands or requests provided for or permitted to be given pursuant to
this Agreement must be in writing. All notices, demands and requests to be sent to any party
shall be deemed to have been properly given or served if personally served or deposited in
the United States mail, addressed to such party, postage prepaid, registered or certified, with
return receipt requested, at the addresses identified in this Agreement as the places of
business for each of the designated parties.
Integration
J.. This Agreement, together with any other written document referred to or
contemplated in it, embody the entire Agreement and understanding between the parties
relating to the subject matter hereof. Neither this Agreement nor any provision of it may be
amended, modified, waived or discharged except by an instrument in writing executed by the
party against which enforcement of such amendment, waiver or discharge is sought.
Capacity of Parties
K.. Each signatory and party to this Agreement warrants and represents to
the other party that it has legal authority and capacity and direction from its principal to enter
into this Agreement, and that all necessary resolutions or other actions have been taken so as
to enable it to enter into this Agreement.
Governing Law/Venue
L.. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance
with the laws of the State of California. Any action arising under or relating to this
Agreement shall be brought only in the federal or state courts located in San Diego County,
State of California, and if applicable, the City of Chula Vista, or as close thereto as possible.
Venue for this Agreement, and performance under it, shall be the City of Chula Vista.
Page 14
Two Party Agreement Between the City of Chula Vista and Harrell and Company Advisors, LLC for financial advisory services
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 214
S:\\Suzanne's Documents\\Client Admin\\Chula Vista\\2015 COP Refunding\\Harrell and Company Agreement - 2015 COP Refunding.docx
15015
ACN:
(End of page. Next page is signature page.)
Page 15
Two Party Agreement Between the City of Chula Vista and Harrell and Company Advisors, LLC for financial advisory services
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 215
S:\\Suzanne's Documents\\Client Admin\\Chula Vista\\2015 COP Refunding\\Harrell and Company Agreement - 2015 COP Refunding.docx
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 216
15015
ACN:
Exhibit A
to
Agreement between
City of Chula Vista
and
Harrell & Company Advisors, LLC,
1. Effective Date: The Agreement shall take effect upon full execution of the Agreement, as of
the effective date stated on page 1 of the Agreement.
2. City-Related Entity:
( X ) City of Chula Vista, a municipal chartered corporation of the State of California
( ) The Chula Vista Public Financing Authority, a
__________________________________________
( ) The Chula Vista Industrial Development Authority, a
__________________________________________
( ) Other: ___________________________________________, a \[insert business form\]
(City)
3. Place of Business for City:
City of Chula Vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
4. Consultant:
Suzanne Q. Harrell, President
5. Business Form of Consultant:
( ) Sole Proprietorship
( ) Partnership
( ) Corporation
(X) Limited Liability Company
6. Place of Business, Telephone and Fax Number of Consultant:
Harrell & Company Advisors, LLC
333 City Boulevard West, Suite 1430
Orange, CA 92868
Page 17
Two Party Agreement Between the City of Chula Vista and Harrell and Company Advisors, LLC for financial advisory services
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 217
S:\\Suzanne's Documents\\Client Admin\\Chula Vista\\2015 COP Refunding\\Harrell and Company Agreement - 2015 COP Refunding.docx
15015
ACN:
(714) 939-1464
(714) 939-1462 (FAX)
7. General Duties:
Provide all necessary financial advisory services to assist in the issuance and refunding of
the 2004 and 2006 Certificates of Participation.
8. Scope of Work and Schedule:
A. Detailed Scope of Work:
Consultant will be responsible for the following:
Bond Sizing. Size the Bonds and structure bond repayment terms and conditions which
1.
most advantageously meet current market conditions and the objectives of the City.
Prepare refunding cash flows and arrange for defeasance escrow.
Assist the City staff in preparing the staff reports for City Council meetings.
2.
Document Review. Review and comment on all legal documents prepared by the City’s
3.
bond counsel to ensure conformance with the proposed financing structure.
Rating Agency Meetings. Submit documents, conduct negotiations and attend meetings
4.
with rating agencies as may be required.
Official Statement. Prepare the preliminary and final Official Statements to be used in
5.
connection with the offering of the Bonds and distribute electronically.
Disclosure Issues. Provide technical support in defining disclosure issues necessary to
6.
meet SEC guidelines, as well as work with the City to fulfill its continuing disclosure
responsibilities under the Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 15c2-12.
Pricing. For a negotiated sale of the Bonds:
7.
advise the City on the propriety of the underwriter’s pricing and compensation
a.
relative to the current market conditions;
negotiate to provide the lowest available rates and costs to the City;
b.
provide the City with a pricing analysis and comparison of its transaction with other
c.
recent sales of comparable credit quality; and
provide quantitative schedule showing the results of the final pricing.
d.
Bond Closing. Review and coordinate arrangements for closing and delivery of the
8.
Bonds, paying particular attention to needed certificates and representations of other
parties to ensure certification of information relied upon in the financing.
Attendance at Meetings. Attend all meetings relating to the financing with City staff,
9.
Page 18
Two Party Agreement Between the City of Chula Vista and Harrell and Company Advisors, LLC for financial advisory services
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 218
S:\\Suzanne's Documents\\Client Admin\\Chula Vista\\2015 COP Refunding\\Harrell and Company Agreement - 2015 COP Refunding.docx
15015
ACN:
bond counsel, disclosure counsel and underwriter as required.
Bond Administration – Advise the City in administration of the financing after bond
10.
closing, working closely with the Finance Department and City’s auditors as needed.
B. Date for Commencement of Consultant Services:
( X ) Same as Effective Date of Agreement
( ) Other: _________________________
C. Dates or Time Limits for Delivery of Deliverables:
Deliverable No. 1: Consists of items 1 – 9 under detailed Scope of Work section.
Deliverable No. 2: Consists of item 10 under Detailed Scope of Work section. Delivery
of item will be on an ongoing basis.
D. Date for completion of all Consultant services: After completion of bond refunding or
termination of agreement by thirty days written notice from either party.
9. Materials Required to be Supplied by City to Consultant:
The City agrees to make available to Consultant, without cost, sufficient copies of any
applicable reports, agreements, contracts, resolutions and other relevant documents regarding
the issuer of the securities as reasonably may be required from time to time for the prompt
and efficient performance by Consultant of its obligations hereunder.
10. Compensation:
A. ( X ) Single Fixed Fee Arrangement.
For performance of all of the Defined Services by Consultant as herein required, City shall
pay a single fixed fee in the amounts and at the times or milestones or for the Deliverables set
forth below:
Single Fixed Fee Amount: $60,000, payable at bond closing.
Milestone or Event or Deliverable Amount or Percent of Fixed Fee
( ) 1. Interim Monthly Advances. The City shall make interim monthly advances
against the compensation due for each phase on a percentage of completion basis for
each given phase such that, at the end of each phase only the compensation for that
phase has been paid. Any payments made hereunder shall be considered as interest
free loans that must be returned to the City if the Phase is not satisfactorily
Page 19
Two Party Agreement Between the City of Chula Vista and Harrell and Company Advisors, LLC for financial advisory services
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 219
S:\\Suzanne's Documents\\Client Admin\\Chula Vista\\2015 COP Refunding\\Harrell and Company Agreement - 2015 COP Refunding.docx
15015
ACN:
completed. If the Phase is satisfactorily completed, the City shall receive credit
against the compensation due for that phase. The retention amount or percentage set
forth in Paragraph 19 is to be applied to each interim payment such that, at the end of
the phase, the full retention has been held back from the compensation due for that
phase. Percentage of completion of a phase shall be assessed in the sole and
unfettered discretion by the Contracts Administrator designated herein by the City, or
such other person as the City Manager shall designate, but only upon such proof
demanded by the City that has been provided, but in no event shall such interim
advance payment be made unless the Consultant shall have represented in writing that
said percentage of completion of the phase has been performed by the Consultant.
The practice of making interim monthly advances shall not convert this agreement to
a time and materials basis of payment.
B. ( ) Phased Fixed Fee Arrangement.
For the performance of each phase or portion of the Defined Services by Consultant as are
separately identified below, City shall pay the fixed fee associated with each phase of Services,
in the amounts and at the times or milestones or Deliverables set forth. Consultant shall not
commence Services under any Phase, and shall not be entitled to the compensation for a Phase,
unless City shall have issued a notice to proceed to Consultant as to said Phase.
PhaseFee for Said Phase
1.$ _________________________
2.$ _________________________
3.$ _________________________
( ) 1. Interim Monthly Advances. The City shall make interim monthly advances
against the compensation due for each phase on a percentage of completion basis for
each given phase such that, at the end of each phase only the compensation for that
phase has been paid. Any payments made hereunder shall be considered as interest
free loans that must be returned to the City if the Phase is not satisfactorily
completed. If the Phase is satisfactorily completed, the City shall receive credit
against the compensation due for that phase. The retention amount or percentage set
forth in Paragraph 18 is to be applied to each interim payment such that, at the end of
the phase, the full retention has been held back from the compensation due for that
phase. Percentage of completion of a phase shall be assessed in the sole and
unfettered discretion by the Contracts Administrator designated herein by the City, or
such other person as the City Manager shall designate, but only upon such proof
demanded by the City that has been provided, but in no event shall such interim
advance payment be made unless the Consultant shall have represented in writing that
said percentage of completion of the phase has been performed by the Consultant.
The practice of making interim monthly advances shall not convert this agreement to
a time and materials basis of payment.
Page 20
Two Party Agreement Between the City of Chula Vista and Harrell and Company Advisors, LLC for financial advisory services
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 220
S:\\Suzanne's Documents\\Client Admin\\Chula Vista\\2015 COP Refunding\\Harrell and Company Agreement - 2015 COP Refunding.docx
15015
ACN:
C. ( ) Hourly Rate Arrangement
For performance of the Defined Services by Consultant as herein required, City shall pay
Consultant for the productive hours of time spent by Consultant in the performance of said
Services, at the rates or amounts set forth in the Rate Schedule herein below according to the
following terms and conditions:
(1) ( ) Not-to-Exceed Limitation on Time and Materials Arrangement
Notwithstanding the expenditure by Consultant of time and materials in excess of said
Maximum Compensation amount, Consultant agrees that Consultant will perform all of
the Defined Services herein required of Consultant for $________________________,
including all Materials, and other “reimbursables” (Maximum Compensation).
(2) ( ) Limitation without Further Authorization on Time and Materials Arrangement
At such time as Consultant shall have incurred time and materials equal to
$________________________ (Authorization Limit), Consultant shall not be entitled to
any additional compensation without further authorization issued in writing and approved
by the City. Nothing herein shall preclude Consultant from providing additional Services
at Consultant's own cost and expense. See Exhibit B for wage rates.
( ) Hourly rates may increase by 6% for services rendered after \[month\], 20___, if delay
in providing services is caused by City.
11. Materials Reimbursement Arrangement
For the cost of out of pocket expenses incurred by Consultant in the performance of services
herein required, City shall pay Consultant at the rates or amounts set forth below:
( ) None, the compensation includes all costs.
Cost or Rate
( ) Reports, not to exceed $__________: $__________
(X) Copies, not to exceed $200: $1 per page
( ) Travel, not to exceed $__________: $__________
(X) Printing, not to exceed $$700: $0.40 B&W;
$1.00 color
(X) Postage, not to exceed $100: At Cost
( ) Delivery, not to exceed $250: At Cost
( ) Outside Services: $__________
( ) Other Actual Identifiable Direct Costs: $__________
Conference Call Charges, not to exceed $500: At Cost
Cal Muni Report Fee, not to exceed $475 $475_______
Page 21
Two Party Agreement Between the City of Chula Vista and Harrell and Company Advisors, LLC for financial advisory services
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 221
S:\\Suzanne's Documents\\Client Admin\\Chula Vista\\2015 COP Refunding\\Harrell and Company Agreement - 2015 COP Refunding.docx
15015
ACN:
12. Contract Administrators:
City:Maria Kachadoorian, Deputy City Manager/CFO
Consultant: Suzanne Q. Harrell, President
13. Liquidated Damages Rate:
( ) $__________ per day.
( ) Other: _________________________
14. Statement of Economic Interests, Consultant Reporting Categories, per Conflict of Interest
Code (Chula Vista Municipal Code chapter 2.02):
( ) Not Applicable. Not an FPPC Filer.
( X ) FPPC Filer
( ) Category No. 1. Investments, sources of income and business interests.
( ) Category No. 2. Interests in real property.
( ) Category No. 3. Investments, business positions, interests in real property, and
sources of income subject to the regulatory, permit or licensing authority of the
department administering this Agreement.
( ) Category No. 4. Investments and business positions in business entities and sources of
income that engage in land development, construction or the acquisition or sale of
real property.
( ) Category No. 5. Investments and business positions in business entities and sources
of income that, within the past two years, have contracted with the City of Chula
Vista or the City’s Redevelopment Agency to provide services, supplies, materials,
machinery or equipment.
( ) Category No. 6. Investments and business positions in business entities and sources of
income that, within the past two years, have contracted with the department
administering this Agreement to provide services, supplies, materials, machinery or
equipment.
( ) List Consultant Associates interests in real property within 2 radial miles of Project
Property, if any:
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
Page 22
Two Party Agreement Between the City of Chula Vista and Harrell and Company Advisors, LLC for financial advisory services
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 222
S:\\Suzanne's Documents\\Client Admin\\Chula Vista\\2015 COP Refunding\\Harrell and Company Agreement - 2015 COP Refunding.docx
15015
ACN:
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
15. ( ) Consultant is Real Estate Broker and/or Salesman
16. Permitted Subconsultants:
17. Bill Processing:
A. Consultant's Billing to be submitted for the following period of time:
( ) Monthly
( ) Quarterly
( ) Other: _________________________
B. Day of the Period for submission of Consultant's Billing:
( ) First of the Month
( ) 15th Day of each Month
( ) End of the Month
( ) Other: _________________________
C. City's Account Number: TBD by Finance Department
18. Security for Performance
( ) Performance Bond, $ _________________________
( ) Letter of Credit, $_________________________
( ) Other Security:
Type: _________________________
Amount: $_________________________
( ) Retention. If this space is checked, then notwithstanding other provisions to the contrary
requiring the payment of compensation to the Consultant sooner, the City shall be entitled
to retain, at their option, either the following “Retention Percentage” or “Retention
Amount” until the City determines that the Retention Release Event, listed below, has
occurred:
( ) Retention Percentage: ________________________
( ) Retention Amount: $_________________________
Retention Release Event:
( ) Completion of All Consultant Services
( ) Other: _________________________
Page 23
Two Party Agreement Between the City of Chula Vista and Harrell and Company Advisors, LLC for financial advisory services
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 223
S:\\Suzanne's Documents\\Client Admin\\Chula Vista\\2015 COP Refunding\\Harrell and Company Agreement - 2015 COP Refunding.docx
15015
ACN:
( ) Other: The Retention Amount may be released on a monthly basis provided that
Consultant has performed said monthly services to the sole satisfaction of the Assistant City
Manager/Director of Development Services or his designee.
Page 24
Two Party Agreement Between the City of Chula Vista and Harrell and Company Advisors, LLC for financial advisory services
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 224
S:\\Suzanne's Documents\\Client Admin\\Chula Vista\\2015 COP Refunding\\Harrell and Company Agreement - 2015 COP Refunding.docx
City of Chula Vista
Staff Report
File#:15-0423, Item#: 7.
A.Consideration of ratification of reappointments to the following boards and commissions:
REAPPOINTMENTS TO FIRST TERM (initial term less than 2 years)
Brent LivingstonBoard of Ethics
Rosa RoblesBoard of Ethics
REAPPOINTMENTS TO SECOND TERM
Pedro AnayaPlanning Commission
Yolanda CalvoPlanning Commission
Eric MosolgoGrowth Mgmt Oversight Commission
Felicia StarrCivil Service Commission
B.ConsiderationofreferraltotheCharterReviewCommissiontoconsidermodifyingtermlimit
requirements.
City of Chula VistaPage 1 of 1Printed on 7/16/2015
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 225
City of Chula Vista
Staff Report
File#:15-0419, Item#: 8.
Councilmember Miesen:
Ratification of appointment of Vlady Dmytrenko to the Mobilehome Rent Review Commission.
City of Chula VistaPage 1 of 1Printed on 7/16/2015
powered by Legistar™
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 226
ΑΏΐΔȃΏΖȃΑΐ !¦¤£ Packet0 ¦¤ 227