HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 1 - Draft Minutes 11/12/14; 05/13/2015axoF
CHULAVISrA
Planning Commission
DRAFT MINUTES OF THE
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
PLANNING COMMISSION
Date: November 12, 2014
6:00 p.m.
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL: Commissioners Anaya, Fragomeno, Fuentes, G
and Chair Calvo
MOTIONS TO EXCUSE: Commissioners Fuentes and va
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND MOMENT OF SILENCE
OPENING STATEMENT: Chair Calvo
1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
October 8, 2014_
MS (Anaya / Fragomeno) at the P" nning
2014 as submitted.
uctory
Council Chambers
ublic Service Building A
k6, 276 Fourth Avenue
ez, UGN7,, Nava,
ssion approve the minutes of October 8,
Cmr. L i u a g r e qqgffWJ the f6k, wigg amendments be incorporated into the minutes:
1. Thd minutes refl ted that the Commission's primary concern and reason for
recomm ing denia f the project was due to the cumulative traffic impacts of the
proposed p ',ect, i conjunction with recently adopted and future SPA Plans in Otay
Ranch, citing
g t affic impacts on Santa Victoria ADT's due to the construction of an
additional elementary school along with the existing 2 elementary schools and 1 high
school.
2. That the minutes reflect that the Commission requested that they be notified when this
item goes to hearing before the City Council.
MSC (Anaya / Fragameno) (5- 0 -0 -2) that Commissioner Livag's amendments be reflected in the
minutes of October 8, 2014. Motion carried with Commissioners Fuentes and Nava absent.
Planning Commission Agenda
November 12, 2014
Page -2-
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Persons speaking during Public Comments may address the Board /Commission on any subject
matter within the Board /Commission's jurisdiction that is not listed as an item on the agenda.
State law generally prohibits the Board /Commission from discussing or taking action on any
issue not included on the agenda, but, if appropriate, the board /Commission may schedule the
topic for future discussion or refer the matter to staff. Comments are limited to three minutes.
CONSENT ITEMS:
The Planning Commission will enact the Consent Calendar staff
motion, without discussion, unless a Planning Commissioner, a
requests that the item be removed for discussion. If you wish to
out a "Request to Speak" form (available in the lobby) and r
meeting. An item pulled from the Consent Calendar will d/PL
Consent Calendar. _
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
The following item(s) have been adverti - public hearinC
to speak on any item, please fill ou eq o Speak"
submit it to the Commission Secretary prio th e -1 ,
nenions by one
%' , of the public, or staff
Ik o` his item, please fill
to the reta prior to the
I immedi following the
required by law. If you wish
(available in the lobby) and
2. PUBLIC HEARING: Consid , f a Tent ive Subdivision Map to subdivide a .98 acre site
in five (5) ingle -fam -pots for individual ownership in the R1 -5P
The ° scat at 386 Date Street.
Applic t pplicant I eria Project Management, LLC.
3r
oject IVr,aager: Caroline Young
Caroline Y ;7 gave a Powe Point;p'resentation of the project.
Staff recommendron: Ad f-A the resolution that the Council approves the tentative map.
Member of the publicohn Arenas, 375 Date Street #2.
Mr. Arenas expressed his concern regarding the lack of clean up in his neighborhood. Items
such as concrete with asbestos, and tires can be found at the bottom of the riverbed. Mr.
Arenas asked that these issues be addressed prior to the development of the mentioned
project.
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED: 6:22 p.m.
DISCUSSION: The commissioners asked staff for the results of the environmental studies that
were conducted for the project. Staff explained that the geotechnical, drainage, and water
quality reports did not show any indication that the project could not proceed. In addition, if
there is a discovery of asbestos during the grading and construction phase, further testing of
the soil will be conducted on the site.
Planning Commission Agenda
November 12, 2014
Page -3-
The commissioners asked for clarification of where the discharge pipe was going to drain. Staff
explained that the drainage will be outleting towards the south for overflow.
MSC: Motion (Calvo /Gutierrez) 5 -0 -0 -2
Motion carried with Commissioners Fuentes and Nava absent
3. PUBLIC HEARING: Review and consideration of changes to the Growth Management
Ordinance (Chapter 19.09 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code) and
adoption of the Growth Management Program Implementation Manual
to replace the Threshold Standards and Grow agement Oversight
Committee Policy and the Growth Manage 4 t Program document.
Project Manager: Kim Van Bie
Ed Batchelder gave a brief explanation of the Growt" anament Oversight Commission work
and the Implementation Manual including change to ..,e or nces as well as the revisions of
threshold standards.
Ms Vander Bie gave a presentation oft
program and current ordinance. The rim �y
the threshold standards goals, objectives, ai
facility master plans. Sign ifica haanges wer
significant to goals for Sch and S ver, and
updated for all of the thr hhold staibards.
Ms. Vander Bie reviewed the E
Quality, Fiscal, atf ci cs a n d
R
and Sewer. AAo sere were ohan
gave the updated measure ant!
#'on of the Grog Management Oversight
revs ade to the ordinance were to insert
i - eme ion measures, as well as links to the
Cade to goals with Traffic and Fiscal and less
atf. The implementation measures were
threshold standards for the Police Department, Air
�tion, Libraries, Fire and Emergency Services, Drainage,
ade to Schools and Water Conservation. Ms. Vander Bie
h the proposed changes.
Staff Recommendai,�-t,; T+,-adopt and approve the resolution approving the amendments to
the Growth Managem Ordinance Chapter 19.0 and adopt the Resolution PCM- 09 -12A to
adopt and approve the Growth Management Oversight Commission Implementation Manual.
PUBLIC HEARING OPENED: David Danciu
Mr. Danciu asked who the stakeholders were and who had been contacted in regards to the
Ms. Vander Bie's mention that she sent out emails to Crossroads, Southwest Community
Planning District, the Chamber of Commerce and several developers.
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED:
Planning Commission Agenda
November 12, 2014
Page -4-
COMMISSIONERS DISCUSSION:
MSC Motion (Livag/Fragameno) (5- 0 -0 -2)
That the Planning Commission approves the changes to the Growth Management Ordinance
(Chapter 19.09 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code) and adoption of the Growth Management
Program Implementation Manual
Motion car•rinrl wi th f nmmieeinnnre Minn+nc nnel Nwn nhmn+
OTHER BU
4. DIREC
S. COMP
ADJOURNI
Material:
availal
The City
(619) 409 -.
fiber 19, 2014
agenda are
i Avenue,
,nd, and /or
ist forty -eight
tmcF
CHULAVISTA
Planning Commission
gra mutes
REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF CHULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
G n c i I C ka mbers
Public Ser ilding A
276 E rth Avenue
ivag, Nava (in at 6:08),
Oner Nava.
ind it passed 5 -0 -2 -0
remission on any subject
an item on the agenda.
or taking action on any
7ission may schedule the
nited to three minutes.
Planning Commission Minutes
May 13, 2015
Page -2-
"11Y.11 1
CONSENT ITEMS:
The Planning Commission will enact the Consent Calendar staff recommendations by one
motion, without discussion, unless a Planning Commissioner, a member of the public, or staff
requests that the item be removed for scussion. If you wish to speak on this item, please fill out
a "Request to Speak" form (available in the lobby) and submit it to the Secretary prior to the
meeting. An item pulled from the Consent Calendar will be discussed immediately following the
Consent Calendar. ,
PUBI
The ,
to sE
subn
1. PI
Plan
due
was
2. P
INTRODUCTION
wish
and
, use,
WTF)
high
and
2375
less
)ulled
licant
e site
inium
As at
im lot
finer
The California Recover Fund, LLC (Applicant) has submitted applications for a Design Review
Permit and a Tentative Map for redevelopment of the 2.67 -acre site located at 1350 Industrial
Boulevard (Site) with a multi - family residential project known as Industrial Townhomes
(Project). The Project Site is located on Industrial Boulevard near the intersection with Ada
Street in the vicinity of the Palomar Trolley Station (see Attachment 1, Locator Map), within the
Planning Commission Minutes
May 13, 2015
Page -3-
Palomar Gateway District Specific Plan ( PGDSP) area. The proposed project consists of the
construction of 42- townhome units, landscaped areas and active /passive recreational and open
space areas throughout the site. The project also includes the construction of the associated
access and circulation elements. The proposed Tentative Map would subdivide the site
(currently composed of two legal lots per the 1911 Map) into one condominium lot for the
project. The condominium map would allow the units to be sold individually. The project has
been reviewed and evaluated by City staff and it is being presented to Commission for
consideration and approval.'
BACKGROUND
rea E Tund the :'?alomar Trolley
he site as a " area of
n and /or redeve ment are
General Plan visi s,b for the PGD
lomar Trolley Station and a
it south of the Transit Station
vay D':55,trict). The General Plan
ix I -uses that take advantage
a jg2ctively implement the vision
�_V
=ic plan for the PGD area.
A
Comme�, al office, co ercial -s -ce and retail, park and open spaces, and accessory uses.
The site is design - ed fo °multi- family residential development, the Palomar Residential
Village (P sub- district,uvhich utilizes the City's existing R -3 (Apartment Residential Zone)
zoning regulGyns.
City staff has revi ° , d the Industrial Townhomes applications and the associated conceptual
design plans andthe Tentative Map in the context of the PGDSP regulations /development
standards of the PRV sub - district.
CONCLUSION
The proposed project will provide new investment and modern housing facilities and site
improvements that will contribute to revitalize and enhance the Site and the neighborhood.
The Project's pedestrian orientation and location near the Trolley Station will provide
Planning Commission Minutes
May 13, 2015
Page -4-
DRAFT
convenient access for residents to nearby public transportation. The project will provide new
for -sale multi - family housing that will improve the housing mix and enhance residential
opportunities in the neighborhood.
The site will be developed with a quality project that is consistent with the vision, objectives
and policies of the General Plan and meets the requirements of the PGDSP and the Guidelines
of the City's Design Manual. The proposed project is well planned, incorpo = -, g the principals
of Smart Growth and resource conservation. It is designed to respect ar l len 'with the
community character, local history, and climate. The proposed proje' ' I re- activate the
street and contribute to improve the neighborhood and create re entia d business activity
in this part of the City. Based on the description and evaluation ore projec T_nd the
conclusions above, staff recommends that the Planning Co ion aprove th op d
project subject to the conditions contained in the resolu ' S.
RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission approves the Design Re w Permit (DRC 14 -20) and the
Tentative Map (PCS 14 -02) resolutions to develop the subje t >h th the proposed Project,
subject to the conditions listed in the
STAFF PRESENTATION: Planning Ma er atch Ir introduced Project Manager
Richard Zum fio proc- tided with a PowerPoint presentation
ncluded th roject description and included photos of the
area § he locatio, elevations and plans for the
- cones �miniums a ite improvements.
COMMISSIMOR45m, ! IBERAT ZE S /QUESTIONS
Com loner Livag: t builds �° 4 and 8 there looks to be a large retaining wall. Will the
gradlhg taken down? vide is concerned that the single family homes will be about 10 feet
higher.
Planning Mana i B - elder has been involved and gave an explanation as to the grading,
slope. The wall w_ "tie a tiered wall with plants to break up the scale of the wall. There was
further discussion regarding the height and aesthetics of the wall.
PUBLIC HEARING OPENED
Mr. John Romero — a resident at 3403 Dorchester — adjacent to the project property spoke
regarding access to his property from Industrial Avenue. There was discussion among the
Commission, staff, the developer and Mr. Romero as to "legal" access — which he has off of Ada
street. Usually properties are not allowed two access points unless they have a legal easement.
Planning Commission Minutes DRAFT
May 13, 2015
Page -5-
Mr. Romero is simply requesting of the developer that, in good will, that in the development of
the adjacent property, his access not be blocked. The Commission cannot condone approval
for that, but as a good neighbor, the applicant has agreed to work with Mr. Romero so as not to
block access to his property from Industrial Avenue.
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED
MSC ACTION: Tentative Map PCS -14 -02 — with corrections of typogra,:ical
Motion to approve made by Calvo; Seconded by G !�F' Jerr
Vote: 6 -0 -1 -0
MSC ACTION: Design Review Permit DRC -14 -10 — with c -'ec' s on typog
Motion to approve made by Calvo, Se.11 sled by Fragomeno
Vote: 6 -0 -1 -0
OTHER BUSINESS
S. COMM
There
AD1
COW ANTS:
Pat Laughlin, Secretary
p.m. to the next Regular Planning Commission Meeting on
2015 at 6:00 p.m. in Council Chambers.