The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda Statement 1979/06/05 Item 11 Item No. 11 6/5/79 {; ;. CITY OF CHULA VISTA COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMEyT Item No. �•� >> 6/5/79 For meeting of �/��4 Public hearing - Consideration of amen�ent to Municipal Code relating to panhandle ITEP1 TITLE �ots, flag lots, or lots served by an easement Ordinance q1868 - Amending Chapters 19.22, 19.24 and 19.26 of the Municipal Code relating to panhandle lots, flag lots and lots served by an easement SUBMITTED BY Director of Plannin� �[CO14D Rc; .�ii!u A�:D A�CPTION [TEM EXPLANATION (4/5TH'S VOTE REQUIRED YES_ NO X ) A. BACKGROUND 1 . Over the past years the Planning Commission has granted variances from the minimum lot frontage requirements in the single family and two family residential zones permitting the creation of panhandle (flag) lots and lots served by an easement. Section 19. 14.200 of the Municipal Code states in part that, "No grant of variance shall be authorized if the Zoning Administrator finds that the conditions or situation of the specific piece of property or the intended use of said property for which variance is sought, or one or the other in combination, is so general or recurrent in nature as to make reasonably practical the � formulation of a general regulation for such condition or situation. " The variance requests which have been granted are so similar in nature that it is anticipated other requests will be forthcoming, therefore, the following amendments to the Code establishing re9ulations and guidelines governing the development of panhandle lots are proposed. 2. On hiay 25, 1979 the Planning Corrmission adopted the Negative Declatation on IS-79-49 which is herewith forwarded to the City Council . B. DISCUSSION 1 . The proposed amendments to the zoning ordinance v�ill allow for the processing of the occasional request for development of a lot which lacks frontage on a public street but which has access from an easement without the need to apply for a variance. In the past, the variance procedure has been used but the classical variance findings are difficult to make in this type of case. Procedurally, it is preferable to amend the zoning ordinance to allow for the development of such pre-existing lots subject to the appropriate conditions of approval . The language of the ordinance utilizes the conditions of approval previously established by the Planning Commission as guidelines. _ KGL:hm (continued on supplemental page) EXHIBITS Agreement_ Resolution_ Ordinance X Plat_ Notification List_ Other Res.PCA-79-5 ENUIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT: Attached� Submitted on FINANCIAL IMPACT STAFF RECOMMENDATION Concur with Planning Commission recommendation. BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION On April 25, 1979 the Planning Commission voted 7-0 to adopt the Negative Declaration on IS-79-49 and to recomn the Municipal Code in accordance with Resolution PCA-79-5. COUNCIL ACTION /'� Ciiy ;.`.:._ il �-" ��..D�_,�1�e:.. _.,;:(/= / ' . . L`, i`i _ .... �� S i L�l:l{.7 �i,, , l_...�,.:'tlf= i , . , .:... .,. CC`J�:7 �v: �, � Dated S - a �� ! Dated o'r'm'-Avi-i-3— . ) , - : . AGENDA ITEM NO.=�r�a 11 Meeting of 6��3 6/5/79 Supplemental page No. 2 2. The substance of the amendment is set forth in Exhibit "A" of the Planning Corrmission's resolution, Section 19.22.150 (A) through ( I) . References to Section 19.22.150 are placed in other appropriate sections of the ordinance in order to avoid unnecessary repetition of the development standards. , ':L.,_ - .- . . - . " _. " . , , - . _ __ �_�_ 1 ' ' . .. . r � � . . � . ,�� '�a�`'� U �� .e'��`u��, � u�i.� . PROJ�CT TZTLE: Zoning Text Fvnendment relating to panhandle and easemerit lots � , Project Location : Not site specific Project Pro�or.ent : City of Chula Vista - C.�SI: t�:0. IS-79-49 DATE: April 2, 1979 _ A. Backqround ' Over the past years the Planninq Commission has granted variances from the mininum lot frontage reouirements in the single family and t�•ro family residential zones permitting the creation of panhandle (flag) lots and lots served by an easement. Section 19.14.200 of the I•lunicipal Code states in part that "P!o grant . of variance shall be authorized if the Zoning Administrator finds that the conditions or situation of the specific piece of oroperty or the intended use of said property . . for vihich var.iance is sought, or one or the other in combination, is so qeneral or recurrent in nature as to make reasonably practical the formulation of a general regulation for such condition or situation:" The variance requests o-ihich have been granted are so similar in nature that it is anticioated other requests o-�ill � be forthcoming, oranpting staff to -prepare these proposed amendments-to the Code establishing regulations and guidelines governing the development of panhandle lots. B. Project Proposal - • ' The folloi•iing are proposed Zoning Text Amendments reiatinn to oanhandle lots, flag lots or lots served by an easement. - Chapter 19.22 R-E - RESIDEi�JTIAL ESTATES ZOPJE . Mend Section 19.22.080 to read as follows: � � "Every lot in the R-E zone shall have a minimum frontage upon a dedicated - street of one hundred feet (100' ) , unless such lots front upon an aporoved easer�ent or private road as provided in this Chapter (See Section 10-.22.150) or unless such lot has been approved �b,y the Planning Commission or City Council pursuant to the provisions of this Code or an.y ordinance which may hereafter be enacted providing for the subdivision of land or the dedication of public . �streets . " Add net•i Section 19.22. 150 (See attached) Chapter 19.24 SiilGLE-F�L�IfLY RESIDEiJCE ZO�IE . Amend Section 19.24.070 B to reaii as follo�•is: . "[3. t�lininum dimensions: The follo�•ring minimum dimensions shall be observed; provided ho�:rever, that such dir�ensions may be modified by the grantina of a variance. The minimum reauirements shall be one of the folloo-iing district classifications as designated on the zoning map. " I �' � �' � . _� .- _ , _ — Pmend Section 19. 14. 110 to read as follo�•is: "Every lot in the R-1 zone having an area bet�,ieen 5000 sq. 'ft. and 5999 sq. ' - ft. .shall have a minimum lot frontage upon a dedicated street of fifty feet (50' ) and every lot having an area of 6000 sq. ft: or greater shall have a minimum lot frontage upon a dedicated street of sixty feet (60' ) unless such lots front upon an approved easement or private road as provided for in this chapter (See Section 19.24. 170) or unless such lots have been - approved by the Planning Commission or City Council pursuant to the provisions of this Code or any ordinance �•�hich may hereafter be enacted providing `or the subdivision of land or the dedication of public streets." _ Add nevi Section 19. 24. 170 (5ee attached) � Chapter 19.26 R-2 - OidE AND Tl•!0-FAh1ILY RESIDEPICE ZOi;E Mend Section 19.26.070 to read as follo�,is: "The follo!•iin9 minimum dimensions shall be observed; provided ho�•iever, that 5uch dimensions may be modified bv the granting of a variance. The minimun � re�uirements shall be one of the follo�•iing district classifications as designated on the zoning map. (For exceptions see Sections 19.16.020, 19.16.060 and 19.16.080) . " � Add ne�•i Section 19.26. 150 to read as follo�•is: "19.26.150 Fronta9e requirements Every lot in the R-2 and R-2-X zone shall have a minimum frontage upon a dedicated street of sixty feet (60', ) , unless such lot fronts upon an approved easement or private road as provided in this Chaoter (See Section 19.26.160) or unless such lot has been approved by the Planning Commission or City Council oursuant to fhe provisions of this Code or any ordinance rrhich may hereafter be enacted providing for the subdivision of land or the dedication of public streets. " Add ne�:i Section 19.26. 160 (see attached) . C. Com�atibility �•iith Zoning and Plans The project p:-oposal is consistent with the zoning ordinance and is not at variance �vith the intent of the General Plan. D. Findings of Insignificant Impact 1 . The proposed ordinance amendments are not site specific , therefore �•�ill not adversely effect any natural or man-made resources. - 2. .•The project proposal is not at variance with the General Plan' or � . associated elements and �•iill not achieve short-term to the disadvantage of long-term environmental 9oals. 3. 7he project is not anticipated to result in any adverse impacts �•+hich. could interact to create a substantial cumulative effect on the environnent. � 'This type of use is currently beinc� permitted by the variance procedut•e, this amendment �•+ould only change the orocedure for obtaining approval of .the �roposals. � 4. ` �10 significant increase in vehicle traffic or related noise or emissions '"is� expected to occur due to project implementation. . , Z � _ - � � �� , E. Consultation I 1. Individuals and Orqanizations , City of Chula Vista - D. J. Peterson Dir. of Planning Qill Ullrich Assoc. Engineer Gene frady Dir. of Building & Housing Peggy Donovan Environmental Control Commission 2. Documents Title 19, Zoning - Chula Vista I•iunicipal Code ' The Initial Stucy elpplication and evaluation forms documer.ting the _ findincs of no signiFicant impact are on cilc and availablc Lor public review at the Chul❑ Vista Planning Dcot. , 27G 4th Ave . , Chula Vist� , CA. � ��'� % �� / E:`iVIt:O`::�. '.:TAL RE��IG:•i COORDZN.ITOit 1 �� =:v 3 crev. s/�; ) . ' . . . : . � . . a��acw�.::r " Secticns !9.22.1i0. 19.?;.170 and 19.26.tE0 - Panh;ndle Lc-s, Flaq lo[s, _�'-- .:-_. . ... � .-� � -_.._.... -.-_. . � ,. cr LoCS served by an Ease�ent - Reauirenents and Conditions 1. Par.nzndle lo[s, flaa lo!s or to[s served 7y an easer..enc preposed witnio �•_:�'-: .� """--� '� - -°" --=' =----' a suSdivision shall ceeS ;he follo�.+ing criteria. . 2. ^o lot nay be treaced or developed under tnis provision .iichcu[ zopro•n_i ��:'_;''_' ' "�:� � - -" �� of che Direc[or of Plannir.g and City Engineer. �- _ , � . 7. All developr.,en[ pemi[Ced under [his provision shall 6e subiec[ to ihe . - � � � - � . � - reeulaCions and require.^.ents of this ti[le except zs othenrise reyulaLe? ;� . .._ . .-- . _ _ . -- �. - .his sxCion. � . - �� _ - _ " ' ,. TFe d�vision of any Orop=r.y un�er Chis provision snaii be subj_ct to � - - � � � Cne r=r.u7aiions of the 5[a[e �{ap ac[ and SuSCivision Ordinzr.ce of the Ci[•i - . � _ . . - . o; Chula 7is:a. � . . _-�, :-.,. .. . -� ... 5. tlot r..ore chan four (4) locs served by a private road or ease-_nt snall 6e allo'.s2d ucder this provision unless :his restriction is r:aivzo Sy tce ,- . . : " - "";�;,:.;..::..�:1 Direccor ai Planning or City Countil. 6. ine responsibility Yor [he naintenance and cost of nzin'=nzr,c=_ oF all - - � _ '" � _ � - � - co.^on areas, roads or ease�ents and yvesi par'ting areas shzll be ecuall? . __. - � - ., shared b� Che property oxner o` eacn lo[. This shall be accc.�lished . � � � throuch Che `omation of a ho-ea.+ner's associztion. 7. Deveto:.^..ent criceria: _ � : a. Rozd and easer:enc viidchs; � � � � ane lo[ - 15 feet• � � � � � � - b..�o or nore lou - 20 `ee[' . . . . - 'These wid[hs may be intreased if it is detemined by .he Director of Planning Chat a sideo-�alk be provided. „ . � b. All drivCaaqS, 9uc5t parking area5 and road•:+ays shall be oa:ed •.ii:h a ninir.:u:i of 5" o: parcland concrete ce^ent. c. izcn lo[ shall concain an arca no[ Icss [han [nc ninir.u� ioc si-c or _ Lhc m:Lerlyirtg :onc es[Iusi:•e o� all pri•:a[e rcaCS, cc�ron areas ar.,; qu^5[ aarkir.g arr.a5. d. :.Il on-si[C uCili:ics Shall oe ur.�;Crgre�n.Ced. e. Each d:ellirg shall Se cor.neceed :o a qra•�icy sc+er. (. .:n r.n-Sitc firC 4�AranC r.a: ,`.n rcnuircA bi (hc fire �c��r�.en: �..cen ' ' � - SL'Ch IS �:CC^-.^d GCCCSSdfV. r�� . g. Guest aar4.ing shall be pro•:it=_d as :ollo�+s: _ _ one lo[ - one spzce [wo locs - Chre^ spaces „�_ ..Yr_.:_- .'^--_-- ._�.__ thre= locs - five spzces �io[e: The individuai Criv_aays co the garage shatl not Se cens:rued --�_.=-.--.r, :-,:.c._'._,:...,-:.-. :,�.� as r.e^tina the guesE par:ing requirerent. � _ -- _. h. Atcessory svu[:ures shzll not he loca.ed closer Chan [en ;eei (!0') _ - - - *o any E�delling toca:ed on adjace�t oroperry. � _ " � � _ �� _ ' i. ine ;olioo-ring seCSacks shall be oSServed: , _ � - _ - -� - - � - Fron_ yard - 15 iz=i frc� tny access drive and acest par�;ng areas. - . ; . . � - . . _ _ ,1ry garage `acir.a an atc=ss Crice snall be a mini�ua o` 22 `ee[ , - . - - - rr�� [he dri:�e. � -�,- -� - - ' Side yard - �bt less [han tha: reouired Sy Che anderlyir.g zcoe. _ Rear yard - �lot less =han tF.at requirod Sy the unterl�ir.a zone u�c� - inicial cons[ructicn. -.r.::..:.;�..�_:...=.s�..�i..T.t_a..�=.:: j. �] ninir.u� 5 foot high fence snall be pro•�ided on ea[h r.te o` Lhe __ ., privaze drive beuind :he rron[ se[back and on those pre�ercy lines - zSut[ir.g adjoinino prop_r[ies. Tnis reauirenent r.zy be r..caiiied . " or waived hy :he Direci o` Plannir.n iE it is founG chat ;zid `ence - . is noi necessarq `or Che pro:ecCion o: the adjoin;ng proc:r_ies. � k. I: Che proper[y is graEed Co create a building pad Eor eacn lo[, the nininun lavel area (no slope over 5:) of eath pad shall Sr not . . less .han 80': of the minir.u:� loC size oi che underlying =one, Sut in no case shall �he miniau� area Se less than 5000 sq. r;. ' 1. UeveloGnen[ propnsed on esis:inn na[ural .opor,ra�hy, hacirg an averagc na;ural sloac of I0; or 9rcatcr, and rri[h less :h;n 10: _.�..._._,.,.._.,...._-....�._-,...-._.,� o� che si[e Lo Se r,raded, shall be subject [o ,he aoproval or [he � Dire[.or o; Pianninq, ::ho Shall ConSiCer i.he[ncr Svch tev^io;-CnC mill aAver:ely a:.`eci adjacen; ❑rop�rties or de•relo=-m;. 3. :lo gar'arn [Onvnr:ipns ;hall Sc ;crniC;cd. 9. f.c•:clo;r en: ;4e11 Je suJject W archi[eeCUral a:�prn•:al p; �hr �irec[;r ni Planninq. ��' ` RESOLUTIO�� f�0. PCA-79-5 � RESOLUTIO�� Of THE CITY PLAfJNIt�G CO`V�IISSIOiJ RECOhiMENDIP�G TO THE CITY COU�dCIL THE ADOPTION OF AMENDt4E�JTS TO TITLE 19 OF THE t•1U��ICIPAL CODE RELATING TO PA��HANDLE LOTS, FLAG LOTS, OR LOTS SERUED BY AtJ EASEMENT l•1HEREAS, Title 19 of the Chula Vista Piunicipal Code establishes the � minimum frontage upon a dedicated street for residential lots, and WHEREAS, over the past years varia rces have been granted from the minimum � lot frcntage requirements permitting the creation of panhandle or flag lots and lots served by an easement, and WHEREAS, the City Planning Comnission set the time and place for a public hearing to consider amendments to the Municipal Code to allow panhandle lots, flag lots, or lots served by an easement, and 4lHEREAS, a hearing was held at said time and place, namely 7:00 p.m. , April 25, 1979 in the Council Chamber, City Hall , before the Planning Commission and said hearing was thereafter closed, and 4lHEREAS, the Commission found that the proposed amendments will have no significant environmental impact and adopted the �degative Declaration on IS-79-49. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: 1 . From facts presented to the Planning Comnission, the Commission finds that public necessity, convenience, general welfare and good zoning practice require that Title 19 of the hiunicipal Code be amended as follows: Mend Sections 19.22.080 and 19.24.110, and add new Sections 19.22.150.� 19.24. 170, 19.26. 160 and 19.26. 170, as set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2. The Planning Comnission reco�nends to the City Council that said amendments be adopted. 3. That this resolution be transmitted to the City Council . PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY PLANNING COMt4ISSI0N OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, this 25th day of April , 1979 by the following vote, to-wit: � AYES: Comnissioners Stevenson, R. Johnson, Williams, Pressutti , Smith, G. Johnson and 0'Neill NOES: None ABSEP�T: None � .',!�U.�-, � ,� ATTEST: Cha rr�an `�:�e-n, �/',!��r��-ai Secretary _ . , . EXFIBIT A Proposed zoning text amendments relating to panhandle lots , flag lots, or lots served by an easement Chapter 19.22 R-E--RESIDENTIAL ESTATES ZONE Amend Section 19.22.080 to read as follows: 19.22.080 Minimum lot frontage. Every lot in the R-E zone shall have a minimum frontage upon a dedicated street of one hundred feet, unless such lot fronts upon an approved easement or private road as provided in this chapter (see Section 19.22. 150) or unless such lot has been approved by the Planning Comnission or City Council pursuant to the provisions of this Code or any ordinance which may hereafter be enacted providing for the subdivision of land or the dedication of public streets. Add ne�a Section 19.22.150 to read as follows : 19.22. 150 Panhandle lots, flag lots, or lots served by an easement--Requirements and conditions. A. Panhandle lots, flag lots or lots served by an easement proposed within a subdivision shall meet the criteria contained herein. B. P�o lot may be created or developed under this provision which could otherwise be served by a public street unless approved by the Director of Planning and the City Engineer. C. All development permitted under this provision shall be subject to the regulations and requirements of this title except as otherwise regulated in this section. D. The division of any property under this provision shall be subject to the regulations of the State Map Act and Subdivision Ordinance of the City of Chula Vista . E. Plot more than four lots served by a private road or easement shall be allowed under this provision unless this restriction is �aaived by the Director of Planning or City Council . F. The responsibility for the maintenance and cost of maintenance of all corr¢non areas, roads or easements and guest parking areas shall be shared under contractual agreement by the pro�erty ot•mer of each lot; this shall be accomplished throuoh the formation of a homeoo-mer' s association. G. Development criteria: 1 . Road and easement widths: one lot - 15 feet* two or more lots - 20 feet*. *These o-iidths may be increased if it is determined by the Director of Planning that a sidev�alk is required. I �6 � . Eahibit A Page 2 2. Al1 driveways , guest parking areas and roadways shall be paved �•iith a minimum of 5" of portland concrete cement. 3. Each lot shall contain an area not less than the minimum lot size of the underlying zone exclusive of all private roads , common areas and guest parking areas. 4. All onsite utilities shall be undergrounded. 5. Each d�aelling shall be connected to a 9ravity sewer unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 6. An onsite fire hydrant may be required by the Fire Department when such is deemed necessary. 7. Guest parking shall be provided as follows: one lot - one space two lots - three spaces three lots - five spaces four lots - six spaces The individual driveriays to the garage shall not be construed as meeting the guest parking requirement. 8. Accessory structures shall not be located closer than ten feet to any dwelling located on adjacent property. 9. The following setbacks shall be observed: Front yard - 15 feet from any access drive and guest parking areas. Any garage facing an access drive shall be a minimum of 22 feet from the drive. Side yard - Not less than that required by the underlying zone. Rear yard - Not less than that required by the underlying zone upon initial construction. 10. A minimum five foot high fence shall be provided on each side of the private drive behind the front setback and on those property lines abutting adjoining properties. This requirement may be modified or waived by the Director of Planning if it is found that said fence is not necessary for the protection of the adjoining properties. 11 . If the property is graded to create a building pad for each lot, the minimun level area (no slope over 5%) of each pad shall be not less than 80% of the minimum lot size of the underlying zone, but in no case shall the minimum area be less than 5,000 square feet. Development proposed on existing natural topography, having an average natural slope of lOX or greater, and with less than l0Y of the site to be graded, shall be subject to the approval of the Director of Planning, o-iho shall consider whether such development will adversely affect adjacent properties or development. 12. Guest parking areas shall be adequately screened from onsite and adjacent residential properties. l � 6 �' . E�hibit _A Page 3 H. No garage conversions shall be permitted. I . Development shall be subject to site plan and architectural approval of the Director of Planning. Chapter 19.24 R-1--SINGLE-FAFIILY RESIDENCE ZONE Amend Section 19.24. 110 to read as follows: 19.24. 110 Frontage reGuirements. Every lot in the R-1 zone having an area between 5,000 square feet and 5,999 square feet shall have a minimum lot frontage upon a dedicated street of fifty feet, and every lot having an area of 6,000 square feet or greater shall have a minimum lot frontage upon a dedicated street of sixty feet, unless such lots front upon an approved easement or private road as provided for in this chapter (see Section 19.24.170) or unless such lots have been approved by th� Planning Commission or City Council pursuant to the provisions of this code or any ordinance ��hich may hereafter be enacted providing for the subdivision of land or the dedication of public streets. Add new Section 19.24.170 to read as follo�as: 19.24. 1J0 Panhandle lots, flag lots, or lots served by an easement--Requirements and conditions. Panhandle lots, flag lots , or lots served by an easement shall be provided in the R-1 zone subject to the requirements and conditions of Section 19.22. 150. Chapter 19. 26 R-2--ONE AND TWO-FAt1ILY RESIDEPlCE ZOP�E Add new Section 19.26.160 to read as follows : 19.26.160 Frontage requirements. Every lot in the R-2 and R-2-X zone shall have a minimum frontage upon a dedicated street of sixty feet, unless such lot fronts upon an approved easement or private road as provided in this chapter (see Section 19.26.170) or unless such lot has been approved by the Planning Commission or City Council pursuant to the provisions of this code or any ordinance which may hereafter be enacted providing for the subdivision of land or the dedication of public streets . Add ne�•� Section 19.26. 170 to read as follo�•�s: 19.26. 170 Panhandle lots, flag lots , or lots served by an easement--Requirements and conditions . Panhandle lots, flag lots, or lots served by an easement shall be provided in the R-2 and R-2-X zone subject to the requirements and conditions of Section 19.22.150. �G �' _ �5�� PROJCCT TITLE : Zoning Text Amendment relating to panhandle and easement lots Project Location : h;ot site specific Project Proronent : City of Chula Vista CASE r70. IS-79-49 DATE : April 2, 1979 A. Back9round Over the past years the Plannina Commission has 9ranted variances from the mininum lot frontaae requirements in the sinc�le family and to-io familv residential zones permitting the creation of panhandle (flag) lots and lots served by an easement. Section 19. 1d.200 of the t�lunicipal Code states in part that "i;o grant of variance shall be authorized if the Zoning Administrator finds that the conditions or situation o` the specific piece of oroperty or the intended use of said property for �•ihicn variance is sought, or one or the other in combination, is so aeneral or recurrent in nature as to make reasonably practical the formulation of a aeneral regulation for such condition or situation." The variance requests �•�hich have been granted are so similar in nature that it is anticioated other requests �•iill be forthcomina, orompting staf` to prepare these proposed amendments to the Code es�ablishinq regulations and guidelines go•�erning the develooment of panhandle lots . B. Project Pr000sal The follo�:ring are proposed Zonin9 Text Amendments relatinn to panhandle lots, flag lots ar lots served by an easement. Chapter 19. 22 R-E - RESIDEilTIAL ESTATES ZOilE Amend Section 19.22.080 to read as follot•is: "Every lot in the R-E zone shall have a minimum frontage upon a dedicated street of one hundred feet ( 100' ) , unless such lots front upon an aporoved easer�ent or private road as provided in this Chapter (See Section 10.22. 150) or unless such lot has been approved by the Planning Commission or City Council pursuant to the provisions of this Code or any ordinance wfiich may hereafter be enacted providin9 for the subdivision of land or the dedication of public streets ." Add ne�:i Section 19.22. 150 (See attached) Chapter 19. 24 SIilGLE-FAAfILY RESIDEi�ICE ZOi•IE Pmend Section 19. 24.070 B to read as follo�.as : "B. I�linir�um dimensions : Tne folloo-�in9 minimum dimensions shall be observed; provided ho:rever, that such dir�ensions may be modified by the qrantina of a variance. The minimum reouirements shall be one of the folloo-+in9 district classifications as designated on the zoning map. " � �'G � Anend Section 19. 14. 110 to read as follo�as: "Every lot in the R-1 zone having an area bet�:�een 5000 sq. ft. and 5999 sq. ft. shall have a minimum lot frontage upon a dedicated street of fifty feet (50' ) and every lot having an area of 6000 sq. ft. or greater shall have a mininum lot frontage upon a dedicated street of sixty feet (60' ) unless such lots front upon an approved easement or private road as provided for in this chapter (See Section 19. 24. 170) or unless such lots have been approved by the Planning Commission or City Council pursuant to the provisions of this Code or any ordinznce ti•�hich may hereafter be enacted providing for the subdivision of land or the dedication of public streets . " Add ne�:i Section 19.24. 170 (See attached) Chaoter 19.26 R-2 - Oi;E AP�D TIdO-FAi•1ILY RESIDE�ICE Z0�lE Amend Section 19.26.070 to read as follo:rs: "The iollo�vin9 ninimum dimensions shall be observed; provided ho�•iever, that such dimensions may be modified b�i the granting of a variance. The minimum renuirements shall be one of the follo�•iina district classifications as designated on the zoning map. (For exceptions see Sections 19. 16.020, 19. 16.060 and 19. 16.080) . " Add ne1•+ Section 19.26. 150 to read as follo�•is: "19.20. 150 Frontage requirements Every lot in the R-2 and R-2-X zone shall have a minimum frontage upon a Gedicated street of sixty feet (60' ) , unless such lot fronts upon an approved easement or private road as provided in this Chaoter (See Section 19.26.160) or unless such lot has been approved by the Planning Commission or City Council pursuant to the provisions of this Code or any ordinance ��rhich may hereafter be enacted providing for the subdivision of land or the dedication of public streets." Add new Section 19.26. 160 (see attached) . C. Comoatibility �•iith Zonina and Plans The project proposal is consistent �aith the zoning ordinance and is not at variance t•iith the intent of the General Plan. D. Findings of Insi�nificant Impact 1. The proposed ordinance amendments are not site specific, therefore �aill not adversely effect any natural or man-made resources. 2. The oroject proposal is not at variance ��ith the General Plan or associated elements and �•�ill not achieve short-term to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals. 3. The project is not anticipated to result in any adverse impacts which could interact to create a substantial cumulative effect on the environment. This tyoe of use is currently beinq permitted by the variance procedure, this amendnent �:�ould only change the orocedure for obtaining approval of the proposals. 4 . iJo significant increase in vehicle traffic or related noise or emissions is expected to occur due to project implementation. 2 �G� . � , . E.. Consultation � 1. Individuals and Orqanizations City of Chula Vista - D. J. Peterson � Dir. of Planning [iill Ullrich - Assoc. Engineer Gene Grady _ Dir. of Building & Housing ' Peggy Donovan Environmental Control Commission �. Documents Title 19, Zoning - Chula Vista �dunicipal Code The Initial Study Application and evaluation forms documenting the findings oE no significant impact are on Eile and available for public review at the Chula Vista Planning Dept. , 276 4tti Ave . , Chula Vista , CA. U ^ �� - p�.� /,i/"I �, /y.. ! _ �il,,� dd_��. ]:.--- EtdVIRO::E. .T�1L REVIC:•7 COORDINATOR J � � r>; 3 (�CV. 5/77 ) .