HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Statement 1984/11/01 Item 2a CITY COUNCIL/
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA STATEMENT
Item 2a
Meeting Date 11/1/84
ITEM TITLE Public Hearing - Consideration of the Implementation Plan and related
documents for the Bayfront Redevelopment Project
a) Resolution 11821 Authorizing submission of Implementation Plan to the
SUBMITTED BY: /540 California Coastal Commission (4/5ths Vote: YES NO X )
Community Development Direct4M. -
REVIEWED BY: Executive Director
The Bayfront Implementation Plan is the last in a series of approvals required in order
for the City to receive certification from the State Coastal Commission. The Coastal
Commission requires that prior to submission of an implementation plan a public hearing
must be held which is duly noticed in local newspapers and all property owners notified
of said hearing. This is the time and place advertised for the Mayor/Chairman to open
this joint City Council/Redevelopment Agency public hearing for the consideration of sub-
mission of the Implementation Plan to the State Coastal Commission.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Agency/Council adopt the resolution authorizing submittal of
the plan to the California Coastal Commission.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: The City Council , in a workshop held on October 25,
considered the subject plan. The Planning Commission approved the Land Use Plan that is
reflected in the subject Implementation Plan. The Planning Commission is set to consider
the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) on the specific plan portion of the Implementation
Plan in November and will hold a formal hearing to consider adoption of the document on
January 9, 1985.
DISCUSSION:
The Implementation Plan and related documents as presented this evening must be formally
reviewed in context of a specific plan by both the Planning Commission and City Council .
Because an EIR is required, it is not possible to hold such hearings at this time.
Rather, the Agency/Council is asked to review the plan as it affects the Implementation
Plan approved by the Coastal Commission. Formal adoption of the specific plan, subdivision
ordinance amendment, and other required local reviews will be held concurrently with
Coastal Commission review of the documents. Since the Coastal Commission has reviewed
various stages of the document during its preparation, it is not anticipated that major
changes will be required.
The Implementation Plan is a mirror of the Land Use Plan and, as such, the Coastal Commission
is asked to review this document. Because the Implementation Plan will allow the City to
issue permits for construction in the coastal zone, the Commission must certify that the
Implementation Plan does not deviate from the Land Use Plan. Local codes, ordinances,
and, in our case, a specific plan, are in place so as to assure Coastal Commissioners
that policies and guidelines established in the Land Use Plan will be carried out. Any
deviations from the Local Coastal Plan will then have to go to the Coastal Commission along
with local changes in order to be implemented.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: Not applicable.
COU JCCI L/
: 1)" �'u on adopted.
"- —2) MSC(McCandliss/Cox) accept all changes to Specific Plan, including Option C
(nine-Member Bayfront Conservancy Trust Governing Board). (4-1 ; Malcolm "no")
A-4 (Rev. 1/80) 3) (OVER) ,\i1 1