HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Statement 1983/10/25 Item 4,4a COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item 4, 4a
Meeting Date 10/25/83
ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing: Consideration of conditional use permit
PCC-83-24 to construct a 13-unit senior citizen housing
project at 411-415 Park Way
Resolution /] /3 Approving conditional use permit PCC-83-24
to construct a 3-unit housing project at 411-415 Park Way
SUBMITTED BY: Director of P arming (4/5ths Vote: Yes No X )
�4
REVIEWED BY: City Manager
This item was continued from the October 11 , 1983, Council meeting to allow
the proposed senior citizen housing project to be reviewed by the Commission
on Aging prior to Council consideration. In addition, it was requested that
the parking ratio for this type of housing be investigated further. A copy of
the original report is attached.
RECOMMENDATION: See original report
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: The proposed project was reviewed and
endorsed by the Commission on Aging on October 12, 1983.
DISCUSSION:
The Planning Department contacted other jurisdictions in the San Diego area to
determine their parking requirements for senior housing projects. Those
requirements are reflected in the following table:
PARKING RATIO
JURISDICTION GOVERNMENT SPDNSORED PROJECTS PRIVATE PROJECTS
1. National City 1 space per 2.6 units 1 .3 spaces per unit
2. El Cajon 1 space per 5 units No established standards
3. La Mesa 1 space per 3 units 1 space per unit
4. City of S.D.* 1 space per 2 units 1 space per 2 units
5. County of S.D. 1 .5 spaces per unit 1 .5 spaces per unit
* Prior to May 1983 the City of San Diego required one parking space per 3
units.
R-1/1//3
Of the jurisdictions Mee tin, Item 4, 4a
distinction contacted only
Meeting Date—T7$-3
City between senior y the Count
di is of San between recently housing projects County San Diego does not
number one space for changed to conventional make a
of these every 2 units, a parking ratio from housing. The
parking at a projects were concentrated This was one space
premium, in a prompted partly because a
The single area, placing on-street
table also indicates
privately operated that some
that government housing projects. jurisdictions
requirements operated projects Part of the require more parkin
units than do private jects have more ability behind this for
occupied, projects where the y tc control is
Because primary concern the tenancy
of the is keeping the
able to determine brief period before
bi there the rescheduled
having a pare ratio were meeting,
report is of less any parking problems g' the staff was not
report planned for the meeting tregardingsoure with
However,
per unit. projects
L IMPACT. None findings, a verbal
AL:nr
WPC 0556P
(W-142-712------
by the :i y C .:' of �`
Chula Vista, � :i ci hia
A2—lr'/3