Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Statement 1983/08/16 Item 18 COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item 18 Meeting Date 8/16/83 ITEM TITLE: Resolution /23 s--2— Requesting CalTrans to include in its Statewide planning program studies for the extension of SR-125 from the second border crossing to State Route 94 SUBMITTED BY: City Engineer (4/5ths Vote: Yes No x ) REVIEWED BY: City Manager Approximately ten years ago, the Chula Vista City Council supported a motion by the State to remove SR-125 south of SR-54 from the freeway and expressway system. Council 's tern parts of the City.this area would encourage prem ature RECOMMENDATION: That Council approve the resolution requesting CalTrans to include in its Statewide planning program studies for the extension of SR-125 between the second border crossing and SR-94. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable. DISCUSSION: Since that motion remove the following has occurred: and expressway system approximately years 1 . The City Council has approved Phase I of the EastLake development plan which provides for a major north-south prime arterial with the provision for future freeeway right-of-way. 2. The City has hired enti�eteaste planner area for study orderly and full revise General Plan Amendment for development. 3. The City of San Diego in conjunction with CalTrans and the County San Diego have plans approved for the construction of the second border crossing to be the southerly terminus of SR-125. 4. The City and County of an Plan Amendment for major developments in annexation a proposal and a General Otay Mesa area. 5. The Corcoran development ment fore theyoripg r al El City for a Rancho del Rey Specific revision Pl an. increase the p 6. The City of Chula Vista had conducted a preliminary traffic study as part of the EastLake study and is currently, in conjunction with SANDAG, restudying the traffic circulation needs of the entire City for future growth. Page 2, Item 18 Meeting Date -8/16/83 7. The County of San Diego on June 14, 1983, adopted a resolution requesting that CalTrans study SR-125 as well as improving truck access at the second border crossing. 8. The City of San Diego staff is currently preparing an item for their Council with a similar request. 9. The Federal government has approved a 5¢ tax increase providing additional funds to both the Federal Highways and State Highways system with little or no monies for local governments. Therefore, staff believes it's appropriate to get a request in early to study this route in order to get in line, should funds become available. 10. Chula Vista, because of its topography and the general east-west nature of its canyons, has very limited north-south circulation movements in the eastern part of the City which further concentrates the north-south movements to a very few roads. This will create the need for a high level highway system in order to handle the north-south movement. 11 . It is believed that with the second border crossing, traffic volumes in the north/south direction will be high, not only because of the traffic generated within the eastern area, but also because of the through traffic between the second border crossing and eastern parts of San Diego County. Due to the above items and the fact that the County of San Diego has already adopted a resolution and the City of San Diego is considering a similar resolution, staff recommends that Council approve the resolution. JPL:fp WPC 0615E bi i' Cf.'ut i Dated �