Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda Statement 1986/04/08 Item 13
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item 13 ,/ Meeting Date 4/8/86 ITEM TITLE: Resolution / 1 L/ Requesting FY 1986-87 San Diego Urban County Block Grant Projects for Montgomery Community SUBMITTED BY: Community Development Directoqt-- r REVIEWED BY: City Manager g :-� (4/5ths Vote: Yes No X ) The FY 1986-87 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding for the Montgomery area is to be received and administered by the County of San Diego. Although the Montgomery area was recently annexed to the City, the Federal government has not had adequate time to reprocess the FY 1986-87 CDBG allocation for Montgomery. An agreement has been reached between the County and the City whereby the City will decide the projects which will receive Block Grant funding and will manage the implementation of those projects. Board of Supervisors Resolution #R085-7 of November 19, 1985, states that the County agrees to the reasonable transfer to the City of revenues received by the County on behalf of the Montgomery area. The revenues included CDBG funding. FY 1986-87 CDBG funding for Montgomery is to pass through the County to the City, barring any legal or eligibility problems with the projects. The projects recommended for funding in Montgomery are described below: RECOMMENDATION: That the Council adopt a resolution requesting that the County of San Diego utilize their FY 1986-87 Urban County Block Grant funds to fund the following projects in the Montgomery Community: 1 . Street improvements on 5th Avenue, Palomar Street to Orange Avenue. 2. Street improvements on 5th Avenue, Oxford Street to Palomar Street. 3. Street improvements on Williams Avenue, Palomar Street to Orange Avenue. 4. Eligible project to be determined at a later time. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: The Montgomery Community Planning Committee (MCPC) voted on April 2, 1986 to recommend that County FY 86-87 Block Grant funds be used for projects 1 , 2 and 3 in the above recommendation. DISCUSSION: Twenty-two projects in Montgomery have been proposed for FY 86-87 Block Grant consideration (attachment A). It has been a difficult process in narrowing the list of proposals to the few recommended ones which could be funded with approximately $163,000 in Block Grant funds allocated to Montgomery. The amount expected to be available represents approximately 30% less funding than was allocated to the Montgomery area for FY 85-86. The decrease is due to Federal cutbacks. The proposed Montgomery projects had to be evaluated through an abbreviated CIP review process in order to submit them to the County several weeks in advance of the scheduled completion of the project review process for block grant projects located outside of the Montgomery area. Page 2, Item Meeting Date 4/8/86 The County Board of Supervisors is scheduled to approve its entire FY 86-87 Block Grant program at their April 29, 1986 meeting. A public hearing at that meeting will allow citizens to comment on the proposed use of the Montgomery Block Grant funds. Agenda items for that meeting need to be docketed by April 17, 1986. On April 9, 1986 the Advisory Council of the County Department of Housing and Community Development will review proposed agenda items and will decide on recommendations to the board. It is, therefore, necessary that the City Council decide at the April 8, 1986 meeting, which projects to recommend for funding under the County's FY 86-87 Montgomery Block Grant allocation. FY 1986-87 will be the final year that Montgomery Block Grant funds will pass through the County. In future years, the City can make decisions about Montgomery Block Grant funded projects as part of the City-wide Block Grant project review process. Although it is expected that most of the non-Montgomery City Entitlement Block Grant CIP funds will be recommended to go towards financing the City' s share of the Telegraph Canyon Creek Flood Control Project, and although it is appropriate for Montgomery to share in that cost, it was felt important to respond to the MCPC desire to pursue Block Grant projects of the type traditionally done in Montgomery with County Block Grant funds for this final year of County participation. This should be viewed in the context that a large portion of Montgomery General Fund revenue for CIP projects will be recommended for the Telegraph Canyon Project. The 22 Block Grant eligible projects proposed for Montgomery were received from Montgomery residents at a public hearing, from staff, and from the MCPC. Ineligible project proposals were identified and removed from consideration. Eligible projects proposed of January 7, 1986, were presented to the MCPC at a special workshop on that date and received an initial review. The MCPC recommended Block Grant funding in FY 86-87 for six of the projects, Block Grant funding in future years for five of the project and rejection of seven other projects (attachment A). The proposals, as well as subsequent staff initiated proposals, were then passed through an abbreviated staff CIP process. That process ended with the City Manager recommending that the MCPC do a final review for five projects; three of them recommended earlier by the MCPC and two proposed by staff. These projects were subdivided into 14 subprojects so that the MCPC could consider recommending all or portions of the original five projects for funding with the limited Block Grant funds (attachment B) . The 14 subprojects are estimated to cost approximately $627,000. At their regular meeting of April 2, 1986, the MCPC reviewed the 14 subprojects and set their top three priorities for funding, as follows: Priority 1 - Street improvements on 5th Avenue, Palomar Street to Orange Avenue-- including curb and gutter, sidewalks, driveway reconstruction and added road pavement (CIP #N-91e, cost $38,000) . Priority #2 - Street improvements on 5th Avenue, Oxford Street to Palomar Street-- including curb and gutter, driveway reconstruction, sidewalks, drainage inlet, cross gutter, restoration of displaced improvements, and added road pavement (CIP N-91D, cost $62,000). Page 3, Item Meeting Date 4/8/86 Priority #3 - Street improvements on Williams Avenue, Palomar Street to Orange Avenue including curb and gutter, sidewalks, driveway restoration, and added road pavement (CIP #2Y-37, cost $54,000). The estimated cost of these three projects is $154,000. This leaves $9,000 remaining out of the $163,000 in Block Grant funds allocated to Montgomery. It is recommended that the remaining $9,000 be set aside for a local option project to be determined at a later time. There is a likelihood that funds from previous year' s Block Grant allotments for Montgomery could be reprogrammed or will remain following completion of projects. These funds could be added to the $9,000 and made available for larger eligible projects found to be desirable by the City and interested parties in Montgomery. In addition to the projects recommended above, the City Engineer feels that pavement overlays, (project #6, #7 and #8 on attachment) would be suitable substitutions for consideration by the Council . It is the opinion of the Engineering Department that pavement overlay programs should take a relatively high priority because failure to implement them in a timely manner could result in much greater costs to renovate deteriorated streets at a later date. The overlays could also be completed in a short period of time, as compared to other projects which require more planning and design review. Public Works is currently undertaking a pavement management study of the Montgomery area. When this study is completed, they will be able to prioritize the pavement overlay projects for the Montgomery area. It may be advisable to defer recommendations on specific pavement overlay projects until completion of the pavement management study. CIP detail sheets are provided in attachment C for the 14 Block Grant projects recommend by the City Manager for final consideration by the MCPC (attachment c) . Descriptions of FY 85-86 Block Grant funded projects for Montgomery are also provided (attachment D). Copies of the CIP detail sheet of the other projects proposed for Montgomery are available for reading in the Community Development Department and the office of the City Clerk. WPC 219111 b1tt e City Co!incii of Chula Vista, C.,iirornia Dated c * „(DO--0 I N _` 7 CO CD CL �O --O N C mO o- O co J'1 c 7 CIJ -1 - :".' < < Cu Cu 3 -1 N 'S m co co O m m O CD �• 0-Z r+ m x n - �,or _..m 7, Oro m n C om DJ Q-+,�m �m ro a �.c-) 7 r+ 7 = m = m 0 7 n c 0 J p 7' r+ v Z O r+ W r+ m m M n H 7 0 7 7 W CL-5 N _ N O 3 r' O VI c0 <O n C C n *N7 << .�0 7 0 0 7 m D a m -0 c r+( % (0 0 0 N 0 r+ ---I a -o ,-+0 LO n Z -5 "' O .'D co C m I C < co s o m d - 7 7 1 oc W <O O< N n 3 co Fri r 7 0 -. z N r+ v v 0 0 n o> C1 c to m -s -S fD m 7 O VI o a O O 7 7 CU 7 N 7 c0 10 N N Z -3 Z m co w a a J _,J 7 x 0.� -- 0 -5 Z m < x . O O O O fDD DJ d m -A 7 "S 7 'S 7 'T O 7 C O 0. V1 CO CO N 7 0 7 0 7 r1•m r+CD c+m O_ c*0. 7 C r+ c+ Z r+ c0 "A C -s C O l0 CO --, m m 7 M • O m CD m 0. 0- O N O V7 O N W Z Cr cn -n �. .. CL O_ D 0 : C7 CDD a fDD N a i E -mT m J cu 0 N Z• rro - cG -o 7' r co '< r+ a 7 m ) c-r r+ 7 70 7 'S C n C rt. 0- .. < 7r O = O O._ O. m ---I In 01 01 U7 C O O 7 `< N m ? cP N N co N N 1,3 V —. 0 0 01 N j.1 3 cJ N .J ( O W O O O O O O O O 2 O O O O O O O O O 0 0 ---I 2 2 2 2 2 -S .5 -7 -S -S S -5 a a n a m m m m m cD co c., cam. cam. L. c_, cam. v. co co co m m co co .T7 n o n r7 0 C7 n m r+ rh rt r+ r+ r+ c•+ 0 0 2 M 2 0 a -I H 0 z o- C 7 CL o c7 2 2 Z Z 2 2 -< 2 m I I 7 H 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 r+CI I W A A N O V W 'V 01 00 A V rI- O _ rI m s 00 CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO -< rn rn rn rn rn rn Ov CI C m I I 1 I I 1 1 I • 8 01 1 00 co co Co Co Oo co Co co Co XI C C C C C .'S O -1 O -1 O T O Z O -1 O 'S O V Cr O' O' cr o 7 O 7 O 7 O 7 O 7 O 7 O 7 _ -0 cF r+ "CI r rt- 'O - + c+ '0 c 0 o o 0 t0 O c0 0 t0 O l0 O CO O t0 O CO n N O N O O N O N O N O N 5. O w Cu a n T __J O _—,m J J J m J rD O O O O 0 'S -5 'S 'S 7 ,..< ,..< c< c< c< 7C N 7r 7c' O 7r 7r ' N N N N N CS C7 Cl CC7 C Cl C 0 .Z7 O O O 0 0 r rt c- r J r+ rt CS U r u D f rn•S7 -0 -0 -0 -o N N N N N N N r+ rr r+ r+ r+ m co m CD m m m 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 m m m m m rn m 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 C Co C fD C ro sac co co c0 0 /O l0 c0 CT E. 0 n —• o_n -f l0 0 --, c0 0 - 7, 7 7 7• 7 7 7 7• ..., CD m m co m m m n• 0. m A c. m -, N m m m CD CD CD CD '�0 D r+CD a a a a -1 a -1 2 N 170 n 7 n = nri 7' j o' O O. 0 0_ 73 Y c0 10 cO 10 C0 10 l0 m N 0_7 N c1 7 n O O 0.Cu m 0.d m m C m LO 'S m t0 'S Cu N -5 Co N -1 O. N r+ w 7 rt.7 c+7 O c0 -.•N --.•N 7 - o r+ o r+ -3 7 c C N PC•-.co O '>7 CD..C 70 C') N N -1 r-N V C7 ) In (D rt (D a rt CD a CJ+ rD a w rD o co w CD rt Z L•YD C.0 _.•0 0 N w O (D LO fD CO 0 t0 0 O O Q C r � S 0' J•� co rt. -15 J < 7 C r+ 7 < < 7 < N w CD L. CD w �• O < L. 3 O- M n 7' O C')m 0 C 0 CD Cl CD �•rt 77 1-* an Z rD >r 77 'C O w O CD 0 rD O CD N rt N 7 < 7 7 N 7 7 C 7 7 ID w C•) La• a Cl C V, )(< VI rt CD VI rt r+ ri n r+7• rt in rt V, w rr V, CD 7 S LO !D 3 N 0 C J 7 7 D r+ 7 R 10 R 7 \ • \ O w • 'S -i VI C C 0 C C C -' _ r � O D C* 0 0 w 0 Cu O to CO < D CD � to r -5 C C • ... -• N d O D r B O O 0 N 0 O 7 7 rt 7 7 (0 CJ N w 7 7 C 0 w rt a o fD 7 -h u. 7 co CD r+ ,y. c4+3 CD n N CO CD r T Z N O w O >-h m i -∎ 'Z w O CD CD 7 CD <...-5 w CD -s 7'CD -,•w J CD w CD.w CD 0 n N D 7(< N a a(D D. O -, o �'w N O CD . CD CD CD t C 0 7 0 N C S S N w w d 7 5+w < -+.rt. -5 D o CD O • J• O rt. co C) -S 7 Vt a a w > a N N r+CD 77(D Qo < < CZ< N CD CD N 3• 0 7 >r+ CD O< CD fD a, (D rt. 3 r+ r C O Z CD CD C. au w ----h " C r < CD 0 co -5 CD 77 w " rt rt. O -h N M 'G w o toil 7 7 -h o - (n o w 0 v o rte+ C r -a O OD O CD w. CD 3 �O C ri,C (D r-. CD (D ID J 0 w a 'S S 7 a•CD CDN 03, d 3 7 < (D CD •'S O CD CD -5 w (0 Cl) CD CD 1)1 0 7C' 7 N < -5 CD rF 3 0 r+ CD V, w N N W W N-, O-+ A N O co (T) CO V N V 01 Ul NV NW WUl A O O CO CO CO j 0 0 0 0 O O 00 •v O O O O O " C S . 00 00 00 00 O O O O CD 0 O -C) '� T T T T T T -S r+T •S r+-51 -s r+T 0 T T C C C C C C CD O C (D O C O O C Ol C C 7 7 0 0 0 0 O 0 O 7 O 7 1 7 7 a a a fl. a 0_ O V) a O VI a O V) a oD a a m - 3 w 3 w 7 a 3 a 7• 0 CCD D 7 (3D 0 7 N CD a V-' 3• C) 0 ' -h C, -11 -h -h Co a(G co d c<co O.(G CO N CO 3 C C C C C at co a) w as w a) CT m r+ r+ r+ 1 r+n I r+CD I r+O I Cu I Z C C C C -5 .0 W .O N .3 CO pD C -S -5 CO O O O 77 (D co lD CD CD 7 3.• 7 ,(.. 7 3" N CG CG (G (G (G V1 N N N V1 Vt O Co (D CD CD rD N C N C VI C 7 Z Al w w w w -..Cr N CT -..IJ• "'S 'S -5 K O cam. v O CJ. _ - VI In an N U)In 7 co O co 7 CD O 7 O O co W N N N _ N C7 I 1 I 1 1 I - I I I I , 0 N0 (O W 01 - O a) V T ._, 01 W R • W CO LSD LO - CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO I 1 OJ CO CO CO < .D CO LO CO CO V CO V V N CO at al Crl V m I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 CO v I I I I > (O CO CO CO OO CO CO CO CO __ CO CO OO CO 73 O l 0 O 0 C O CO CON CO V V V CO IV IV 0 C '03 if O -03 S O v v3 if O v3 v3 if O 'T O -03 - 'S O 3(") v3 Z O 3 v3 n -5 O O 7 O if if O 7 O 7. O 7 O 7 -0 O 7 -0 O 7 r+ •a r+ -O r+ 'O rt •D r+ 'D rt -0 r+ -_ n O a O 0 O 0 O to O In O cn O In O(In O In o v, o v, O N O N O v, O V, O w A w D w 3 w 3 w 3 w D w 3 a, D w 3 .•< .< .< .< aG ...5 'S N <G < O C) C7 2 C) C) C) () () C) C .ZJ r+ r+ r+ r+ rt r+ C+ c-+ r+ r) m N• N N N N N N N N CD CD CD co CD co CD co co 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 m m 01 m C7'CD C m m m m n 01 7 7 7 7 C CD Cv 7 7 7 7 O 0 CO LO (O CD 0. "S tO 0 lO (0 D 0 0 O T 7 7 7 7 co 3 7 7 7 7• 0 7 O co 0 CD r+3 R' co 0 Cl) 0 a co CD 0 co (D rD CD CD CD N CD -'• O (D < -.. 7 7 = O 0 0 (0 (0 .n ■0 N n. (n 0 0 n 0 0 a . N D C n w w (D O rt co o CD a o 0 J 0. 7 7 C 3• Block Grant Projects Recommended by City Manager for final consideration CIP# COST by MCPC 1 . Street improvements on Fifth Avenue, N-91A $ 42,900 "L" St. to Moss St. 2. Street improvements on Fifth Avenue, N-91B 161 ,000 Moss St. to Naples St. 3. Street improvements on Fifth Avenue, N-91C 73,000 Naples St. to Oxford St. • 4. Street improvements on Fifth Avenue, N-91D 62,000 Oxford St. to Palomar St. 5. Street improvements on Fifth Avenue, N-91E 38,200 Palomar St. to Orange Ave. 6. Pavement overlay, Ada St. N-43A 25,900 Industrial Blvd. to Frontage Rd. 7. Pavement Overlay Jacqua Ave. N-43B 12,200 Main St. to Faivre St. 8. Pavement overlay, Dorothy St. N-43C 28,200 Industrial Blvd. to Frontage Rd. 9. Pavement overlay, Industrial Blvd. N-43D 37,600 Anita St. to Palomar St. 10. Pavement overlay, Clarissa St. N-43F 14,100 Fifth Ave. to east end 11 . Pavement overlay, Hickman St. N-43G 28,200 Fifth Ave. to Fourth Ave. 12. Kitchen facility upgrading N-68 12,000 Lauderbach Community Center 13. Sidewalk construction Tremont St. 2Y-33 38,000 from Hermosa west to end of street 14. Sidewalk construction William Ave. 2Y-37 54,000 between Palomar & Orange TOTAL 627,300 • 71 9 77 "a 1 ' b,v s1 •� � i I p./64 City of Chula Vista IN' — (--'"t 3 PROJECT TITLE • CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT REQUEST _.e- Pavement overlay program - Montgomery ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT INSTRUCTIONS ATTACH A LOCATION PLAT ATTACH COPY OF COST ESTIMATE k Engineering .OJECT LOCATION PROPOSED FY'S Various locations 86-87 PROJECT DESCRIPTION • The streets will be evaluated for appropriate corrective action before a 1-1/2 inch asphalt concrete pavement overlay cap is applied. The corrective action could consist of selective repair and/or the installation of a pavement reinforcing fabric. Subsequent to the overlay, the travelway will be redelineated. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION • The existing street surfaces are deteriorated. To avoid further failure of the pavement and base material , resulting in an expensive reconstruction project, a pavement overlay with selective repair is strongly recommended. FUNDING RECURRING PROJECT COSTS PROPOSED SOURCE OF FUNDS Regular maintenance TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS ITHOUSANDS) 172 Block Grant SCHEDULING NVIRO.NMENTAL DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION Exempt- Class 1(c) CEQA Excluded - Sec 58.35(1 ) NEPA APPROVAL SPAR ENT F},EAD i DATE iill., )4 7/j1 COMMENTS • ^ c J L J ',; 1 _. __`,:,,_:.2 .1__. j 1 1 1 v ( 12, .,..\.. O gHi0VR-H JA.uf` ; t • • x WyKEg .;r ' 4 �-.• Z • EN O IA P'S, ® '' G EO O W 113 t gt % 041 4 o . o o t� }i :1i: g T,IA ift NA PLEB }111" gt r a 4- m N gt. G Z^t ' E MERgON 1 } c 2 OR ‘,r 7:1 ° lc 2 O 1'14" a g t ; r -'i st -. i } 4• f 0xf 0/0 ,, yy ,..i '1 ,--\5 swi itt A O la O -0 UH aEStgt Z OMAR OkE0/ ( O g(. A� �c 7c P GZ• SA-SOP rn . TA PA— AR ocpt-L 0\11',- r T T' f C� m JUNE G v vc Z m N A 0 mairs T `^ `M rn 9` ': ORANGE o AVE. re : M:,RSAT CT. x D r -c x r BELVIA LF rn z Z m= ; K ® N T,; A N I TA 3T. rn TREMONT ST. m TREI N Pt fA Z < < [5 C rn u m MONTGOMERY 3• • D -4 m i ZENITH S MAIN ST. VI s7 fAIVRE ST. i ' 4. R + F x OSA AVE Q CHARLES ti 1 t AVE. , © E C/T Y OF ;'HUL ME Rim not nu c/T Y OF s I'J�"cat �I d7ribar s v as mri F Pn,. eMZnt ov« Ian` A^ t -Sig lo ceChor\ 5 to Mo:N •f90F'ner'�% / 4x4 34 • CITY OF CHULA VISTA Department: Engineering COST ESTIMATE Date: 1/23/86 Prepared by: J. Steiner PROJECT TITLE: Pavement Overlay Program Checked by: Montgomery (Block Grant) UNIT NO. ITEM QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT A Ada Street - Industrial Boulevard to 395 tons 50.00 19,690 Frontage Road B Jacqua Avenue - Main Street to Faivre 186 tons 50.00 9,280 Street C Dorothy Street - Industrial Boulevard to 429 tons 50.00 21 ,470 Frontage Road D Industrial Boulevard - Anita Street to 572 tons 50.00 28,580 Palomar Street E }1--Av errue 395 tons 50.00 19,770 ( no's e- jibie) F Clariss Street - 5th Avenue to East End 214 tons 50.00 10,720 G Nickman Street - 5th Avenue to 4th Ave. 429 tons 50.00 21 ,430 Subtotal 130,940 Contingency 26,188 Engineering & FCR 15,000 Total 172,128 W-E-132 /..,) ' PROJECT NUMBER City of Chula Vista N68 PROJECT TITLE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT REQUEST Lauderbach Center Kitchen Renovation ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT INSTRUCTIONS ATTACH A LOCATION PLAT ATTACH COPY OF COST ESTIMATE Parks and Recreation PROJECT LOCATION PROPOSED FY•S 333 Oxford Avenue 1986-5;7 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Lauderbach Community Center is now being maintained and run by the City, as a result of he Montgomery annexation. The Center's kitchen is in need of repairs and renovation. The itchen is currently not set up as a commercial one. Many groups and organizations rent the enter and use the kitchen facilities. Groups have complained about the inadequacy of the itchen equipment and layout. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION The City could generate more revenue from the facility if the kitchen was improved. More groups )uld rent the facility, cooking classes could be held. The Center's image would be improved ready if the kitchen was renovated. FUNDING RECURRING PROJECT COSTS PROPOSED SOURCE OF FUNDS Community Development Block Grant Funds TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS ITHOUSANDSI $12 SCHEDULING ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION APPROVAL )EPARTMENT HEAD DATE 3 — —6F'6 COMMENTS _ 1.7r\ITAri ;i I ; 1 I- - 1 j J i :i 1 u i la W.E•123 4 CITY OF CHULA VISTA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT COST ESTIMATE Date: 1/21 /86 Prepared by: Rnppr Jones Checked by: PROJECT TITLE: Lauderbach Center Kitchen Renovation N68 UNIT NO. ITE`4 OUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT Sub-Total $7,860 •• . _• -. � . 786 1 1,570 12 146 • f �4 E-132 LI r / / (--/ <.- CITY OF CHULA VISTA COMMUNITY HOUSING IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM / DATE 3 —2-0 -(276 . . n WORK WRITE-bP SHEET lc 1( r1, , ? .....,--• Property Address: / it.. / (D,,,,z-,z-:pir/-7, (-.r.",-I ,;::"."i:-, ' ,- Owner's Name: Owner's Phone Number: ITEM • < , ) I —I 1 .1 , _ ,..-- 4 T. C wit( I)5's 1 ) ''. r e `-, ,,./, .. / !N'r" . "' 'I 1. i ) / Y.. — t 1 11.,/ i''' . . % r e, r- +--- .... I 1 ■ e- i - 0/.1 P(\-1F-f" --, i-4/A )(,- :-, , _,, e-.!.--/,‘ , /.....:,1,1,1 y,„7 ../..f,)e,/(E,4 A ' I "' i..-2, ' r _ ....-r t ) ,-.,/ - _._ i I (.., L -7.) I,---- ) f Gi•-f-... -, 7/41.kit.:. ("' P. "' t ‘,,1 1 i :—I .1,-i•-• .! ,/ T I 7,1,7- , 1 -Ir- .. , '`-r. A 'I' I I;I, )4: ,f ),. /1.44)"/: f V i*)., fli t"fj ) .,,-'4'f' 1..1 r A.,/ ‘-',:,I j/.!,t 7 e-- , 4,,:c:::".) , / f YYs:' .e. - - e, 1 1: , ,/ ±—,f it, t ...,"44t,..t? ' e 1 0"" --..---- .--„. . / ...... J. ; ,. ,.. ,... ......." r ,,, it .,i t e i .._._..,,,,.. .k L :.. I 1 ' : ''',r "I 7-f- -+7,1 ' / 7 - "'" - -.---"r - - - ,, 1 --L....,;., 1 ...' ; I / . f.....- i " V / r j f's 14'-' t'r A „ -NA )7---__________ ,. , i '' 40t, ',.) i i ),/ .?J' , (-7, )(i--If.A.4 #'71•(-)t 1\211(/r•.A -i---- ') 1 \ 7- ,_.,... r .1"•-• 1 i \ .,,,- '1 ,_)( t I' r-T, ( ( ' )4 1,/ , r (I,' (A ):t:::-/-) ,-- 1- ..t....) 4 r — -,...e• ...........— I . / --3 i.,i. • L, / , -` i', ; ..' (7 i ,.' f,--ze--- ...5 7 7",---it,i)/-c.... t ,) 1 1- /A ),-4-4', r'(••• f i i-1.-rft:j ' f )/ is-4. r r74:2,-.2 A . , I 1 - "'—'” , e i 5):-s-,,-- • ', - f , , 1 1 e. .I. .* 1 j el 1 1 ;'. '-7 ' 1- --/ :)i-4(m.'" .'V.:,...... rs. .", --‘ (..) i.1—.1 1 i ", .."—,,I r , , .11—,.-4,.,_) .....-J. z ) , , . .•■•,. i 1.. i I , ..... ,..1•••• ,1'1: i .tt/., .::..../ :^ 1 '''''' ‘.. •4I i r'''er'%;) 1 \ 1 I 4 1 ....s .. ,•••••• , s 4- ......, .•, \ ''''S, i 1''' • , 1 ,r• r. . , 1 1°'i i':".1: i''',1 .."--1,7_,.1,-_ i ..—t/—•-lr' t,"4",-i "--;`" . t. '; ' , ,,i; ./.4 i !' .' 7-- )f / / ,i-i ; . . , ..r .:X 1 "f---# 1 J-1 :1(.- z"-- ,-- ,/ ( I A 1 i 7— 7' _-_-, ,/,/,// , ) -t-, il - ^ : i I A 1 e. 4 1 7 r r)\ r,‘r r ( ."."-he/ 11-4--I, I\-: I) c 'If i )Is'',-7 l', ----'IP 41;ei/et.i() , ..., / ; O(7/f-.)//f../71 ?A)_e:I 1/i-i77,,A. i ITEMIZED ESTIMATE BY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REHABILITATION SPECIALIST LALU ER2A Owner's Name �� Job Address Item 1 . c7?? 2, 50 Item 21 . 2. (737, Cej, 22. 3. 93 Li. c) 23. 4. � �' _ D_ 24. • �TM /o? 5, 26. 7. 33 FO 27. 8. 9,5 , 0 Z 28. 9. V31 ■ Y0 29. 10. G/<S"0 _ OQ 30. 11. x , CC: 31 . 12. Gn 00 Cg-- 32. 13. 5/ l 2/0°----c2:- 33. 14. / a 0 - 34. 15. 35. 16. 36. 17. 37. 18. 38. 19. 39. 20. 40. r� Subtotal /1 7 5 7 1 2< Overhead/O 73'75 . 7 Contingency Profit (3?C / 571 , 57 GRAND TOTAL /✓, <N-:15, (51'? WPC 1221X .., : • • if-' .A ''''ro' c.x. 1 ) ,— CITY OF CHULA VISTA , f COMMUNITY 9_HOUSING IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM .. / DATE . , . WORK WRITE-UP SHEET Property Address: ( 11 tiA3f1(7. kiL r" .,(..! ,Iric) , Owner's Name: i Owner's Phone Number: ITEM , 9) 1 ri)s-A-(6-- 4) F a_i (1-,7:4--4--,--- ,e7t.-; -/AJZ-e-gS,t/ cOVY e'17 (_-;', / I V "Z. X c. 1 " .4..„, .... / I/A!„/r c' -- ...... .1-1:1--Z_ A„,,r) r• 414A r -- ''',C.- t... k ,.....a • 'A /5?ok:'\r,Vi<::::-. .1_ 1 '1.7./::)./1] 'Pt? , '''' •":7 -'- '. ,11\/(f)/4 (.1 1 ie .--- ......„ , , __ c.-..... ......... ilf.} i'7,t -t17/ /4,i,)•0 T/-, :./_„,' _ 1 : LA17— ; 43,44 7 ,t ......_ ,, .. , /-9,4.0 r./-712//t .. &. /-,/ "if.7i )r. ,..---' ‘ t• ,l, f.A---,,, - --, „., ' . ------- - - A 1` -- i ,-; (-7-••;`i ' - / 'r. i' .e1, ,---,, ., . , .1 / ., ) '''_■ (,ri-44: '77,7,,4),A"..- 4--e--", ,i 1 :0,. vr- 1--,- ,;- ..:--/ /10,STM-(( eur /A ) — ,/,' 4) --)/ -- <-,- ) --- (___- /—1_ , ■: „ -dr,' .... .., i . C14. \ i ...,,,, .,ft ... ------------- PROJECT NUMUER • City of Chula Vista 14 2. - 3-3 PROJECT TITLE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT REQUEST Tremont Street from Hermosa to end - Street improvements ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT INSTRUCTIONS ATTACH A LOCATION PLAT • ATTACH COPY OF COST ESTIMATE .Engineering PROJECT LOCATION PROPOSED FY•S Tremont Street from Hermosa to end 87-88 PROJECT DESCRIPTION • Construct ultimate street improvements including curb, gutter, sidewalk, and driveways. • • • • • • . •• • • • PROJECT JUSTIFICATION • During rainy weather, pedestrians Must walk within the roadway which places pedestrians in possible conflict with .vehicles. Installation of the ultimate street improvements will improve pedestrian safety. • • FUNDING IECURRING PROJECT COSTS PROPOSED SOURCE OF FUNDS Regular Maintennace • OTAL ESTIMATED COSTS I.THOUSANDS/ • ,• .• . • • $38 • Gas Tax SCHEDULING NIVIRONMENTAL DESIGN A CONSTRUCTION EXEMPT .CLASS 1(c) CEQA • • APPROVAL :PARTMENT HEAD DATE COMMENTS JLtJ .Thr"'1,1 Tr7,3 . ' 2. • IC•125 - • ANITA ST. . Or 11:41 [31113131w M TREMONT ST g I MONTGOMERY ST > I . ZENITH ST rn MAIN ST. LJ IIijr PROJECT LOCATION DRAWN BY TITLE TREMONT W/ 0 HERMOSA AVE. TO . END STREET IMPROVEMENTS. DATE . . COST ESTIMATE FORM PREPARED BY: J STElNER CHECKED BY: R SAUCEDO DATE: 1/23/06 LATEST UPDATE: 1/23/86 PROJECT TITLE: TREMONT ST HERMOSA AVE WEST TO END — STREET IMPROVEMENTS PRIORITY: 3 PROPOSED FUNDING SOURCE: BL0C|( GRANT COST BREAKDOWN LINE # ITEM NAME UNIT UNIT COST QUANT TOTAL 1 CURB & GUTTER TYPE G (0-2) LF 11 . 00 750 $8, 250 2 SIDEWALK 4 IN PCC (0-7. 1 ) SF 3. 00 3750 $11 , 250 3 GRADING EMBANKMENT/EXCAVATION CY 4. 50 450 $2,025 4 DRIVEWAY 6 IN PCC SF 3.25 1200 $3,900 SUBTOTAL $25, 425 SUBTOTAL X CONTINGENCY OF 207. $5, 005 ENGINEERING 3000 X FULL COST RECOVERY 1 . 731 $5, 193 GRAND TOTAL ROUNDED OFF TO NEAREST $1000 /1986 dollars) $36, 000 ' GRAND TOTAL ROUNDED OFF TO NEAREST $1000 /1887 dUlldr3\ $38,000 PROJECT NUMUER • City of Chula Vista 2'I " 3 PROJECT TITLE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT REQUEST Williams Avenue between Palomar Street and -� Gram AVPnue - Street ImprnvPmPnts INSTRUCTIONS ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT ATTACH A LOCATION PLAT ATTACH COPY OF COST ESTIMATE Engineering • PROJECT LOCATION PROPOSED FY•S Williams Avenue between Palomar STreet and Orange Street 87-88 PROJECT DESCRIPTION • Construct ultimate street improvements including curb, gutter, sidewalk, base and asphalt concrete pavement. • • • • 'ROJECT JUSTIFICATION During rainy weather, pedestrians must walk within the roadway placing them in conflict with vehicles. Installation of the ultimate street would alleviate this problem and improve .pedestrian safety. • • • FUNDING ECURRING PROJECT COSTS PROPOSED SOURCE OF FUNDS Regular Maintenance • )TAL ESTIMATED COSTS 4THOUSANDS) • $54 Gas Tax • SCHEDULING IVIRONMENTAL DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION • Exempt•- class 1(Q) CEQA • APPROVAL PARTMENT HEAD DATE COMMENTS • `. - 4 . . � RECORD # 18 COST ESTIMATE FORM PREPARED 8Y: J STEINER CHECKED BY: R SAUCEDO DATE: 1/23/86 LATEST UPDATE: 1/23/86 PROJECT TITLE: WILLIAMS AVE BTWN PALOMAR ST & ORANGE ST-STREET IMPROVEMENTS PRIORITY: 2 - PROPOSED FUNDING SOURCE: BLOCK GRANT COST BREAKDOWN LINE # ITEM NAME UNIT UNIT COST QUANT TOTAL 1 CURB & GUTTER TYPE 0 <G-2> LF 11 . 00 950 $10,450 2 SIDEWALK 4 IN PCC (0-7. 1 ) SF 3. 00 4750 $14, 250 3 GRADING EMBANKMENT/EXCAVATION CY 4. 50 300 $1, 350 4 ' DRIVEWAY 6 IN PCC SF 3. 25 1500 $4, 875 5 AGGREGATE EASE TONS 21 . 00 140 $2,940 6 ASPHALT CONC MISC PAVING TONS 75. 00 70 $5, 250 SUBTOTAL $39, 115 SUBTOTAL X CONTINGENCY OF 20% $7, 023 ENGINEERING 4000 X FULL COST RECOVERY 1.731 $6, 924 \ GRAND TOTAL ROUNDED OFF TO NEAREST 11000 , 00 / ��~�- - ' --- -- ------------ --------------------- ---� , . . . . . . , 'A . . 0 ; I I _I I I 1-1- -1-T _--1-T—'—"--1-- U • I I I 11111 : : i3I " : PALO A I ■ " ____ __„ 1 1 ' i _i . I i . , 3>_.___I ■ ■ 4ort ri ' .. . - • Er ril ■ , ,, ■;.11111 z -- •____ 0 -Au ta- '-.. -3>-- . . , . , . . .s .., • "I ril li i r•. , -- ---__. , , . , .. .. . 5 , . . , . . , , • . . , .. • /, . • a ca . 43 11 Ell I ra 1 r . . PROJECT LOCATION DRAWN BY TITLE WILLIAM AVE BTWN PALOMAR ST DATE 11 21 a ORANGE AVE. - STREET IMPROVEMENTS .2_ 6 • PROJECT NUMUER City of Chula Vista N -9 PROJECT TITLE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT REQUEST 'Street Improvements on Fifth Avenue INSTRUCTIONS ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT ATTACH A LOCATION PLAT Community Development ment ATTACH COPY OF COST ESTIMATE y p PROJECT LOCATION PROPOSED FY'S East side of Fifth Avenue from "L" Street to Orange Avenue FY 86 - 87 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Improvements include street widening, curbs, gutters, sidewalks„ cross gutters and other drainage improvements. • • • • L PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Street has uneven width and ragged contours. Most of the area has no sidewalks, curbs or gutters despite presence of drainage ditches and relatively heavy pedestrian • use in vicinity of local school . Open ditches need to be replaced with culverts, and cover. , • FUNDING RECURRING PROJECT COSTS PROPOSED SOURCE OF FUNDS Routine maintenance • TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS THOUSANDS/ Community Development Block Grant 378 SCHEDULING ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION Initial Statement Fiscal Year 86 -• 87 I_ APPROVAL DEPART HEA• DATE 1P.AP&Iteatellir COMMENTS Sidewalks requested for Community Development Block Grant consideration by Montgomery Community Planning Committee. • ^^f '-t n n` • iu d W.E.125 CITY OF CHULA VISTA Department: Community Development COST ESTIMATE Date: 3/11/86 Prepared by: Jeff Steiner Checked by: Roberto Saucedo PROJECT TITLE: Street Improvements on Fifth Avenue UNIT NO ITEM QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT L Street to Moss Street $ 31 ,223 Moss Street to Naples Street 117,893 Naples Street to Oxford Street 53,179 Oxford Street to Palomar Street 45,174 Palomar Street to Orange Avenue 27,823 SUBTOTAL $ 275,292 Contingency 55,058 Engineering costs 47,653 $ 378,003 (SEE ATTACHED) L ,--,,,,,)/t- _.) is--v ,•, C/.. CCi<Cb iii : E s-AtAce6c, Miiiqcii ii / ec . . . . --- -------- -- ------------- _-_•—_-__ __ _______ -;,.. _ — •- Ct,k-A .13 /G.A__r_re,2 _ c-Lcx) /z.F •_Si D E i.4 4(..., 2,_\r-c31__5'E 4 2_ 0 6°..s-o q3_ . I • Ty P E /2_,•-_/I.6 7 7- Crc_c. LS 6 5-,_00A4 • / . . -.. 1■ - . . •..4:_6_G_ 6:_ _,_.e1-_/_-_. _&7_.__EIL5 er _(..9 11) a 1 . 00/7-evi ' 1 SS" • 3 2 STS" .:__A s.i __FI-91/5/- (..?) _ x c il v 4 7__-/oiy. • _ -.. a 0,co/cy • 3 0 0 6,4 /a . 20 00 ? 000 . . ' . - i . f ., ,k, 7.i,t, c y I • • - i • e-Jv 6 i/ze---e---x:/-t, /e) x c.IT. 521 o s- •i _ _ . ._s 77 /.,-c iel• r6-- 2,.0 -_s- .e v 0 % .,-z-ct 44 1- 6--- GeD.S- --- _c.)A- ____ __t.ii.J_ /6-//7----:0/---- -I e e',.'-%-/ i Lf rie /7-Y /7 &C-c, G."7-/-7c, •ci___ ./■/. __ pe 61:::6--.- _/z_6;",-,c:)._,-).-?C_ ------------ ----- ------- ------ - ---- - ---- - - - ------ J .:S / //,-z"e 6-1-16--cx e--/-) eY: R SA itcci)r). • )-,Pil C-174 / I 9 a.6 . . TEL.z.-- 6/4 _I)il P/, :..s- -4 S _ ------------ -4------------- ---- _ • /767A1 6,...,/,7-p iv_/c...&--- .2. 1.A•nti777--/- __ 76.)7--.94_ • , ".. ctA_P... ..13 /Ge.,7-r 6-2,____ __ . i. 40_2(:).___ zo /25-- /6 6;2 __ / 6,2 8 . •. ;i • . 0 . 2 80 ±A ,9 /-,s'p ,0-4..._)- b--),..7-- 2 11 _ _1 x c,4 I/4 ry 0.y. • : a o,co/cy . 6-40 // ego 3 oo 0 - il • -- I 1 2 " 504-0 A iv iv c ax/cc...v-26 . . 5_3 )7? • 'i • co", 7-/A.G /c/c y 20 1 , -i• • • ..1 _-/v _ . ..6-6---/ .; i----- • ::/ • :■ To 7.1L. 70 ,v6-,-/27.%.:6.,---s 7- /57/o 0 c, ?3 Po 0 71 - _ . • _. . . - ._:. •t_S_2-7e-c 4 7--c---- _2)6)6=1s- divo 7-- //c,z'Ce._z4 1... &,— crz)s-7— c),r- — • A./6// 4-1 _/ ..} 4i /7.-/ f? E-e-c, c_/1--7-?,5,-_.9/ _ i_fie_Cts.--&--- __-/2 6.-7,'-,c).e...-', -4____ ____ — ---------------- ---- — -- . ._ 1,24_54 '. cs-7-,..--, TT D e ,/; ci/Eck 6 D is'v: R, . "A,<.2 cii //, i9 fip--72-i-} 4 v 6-, /44_6-- R 6 T t..1 Er':/-/__. j•-•C.Dc.3f.'.. .c_-, 7-.° . ,o /v/4-/)1_L7-S' S7 - - .: _ __ C.os7-____ E'ST,/^ -- - ---- ------- ------------- -.....z . CDLA/fr/7)7-X- --- ._ CLA-t .s"-) D 6:14-1/) /_ ___ • 2 . 2 SI s c .- ?.9 0 2_ 22_2 _ • gyPE 8 /iv66--7- __..../:)=G_G__767 _,_47--67 .845e___ 0-.. , 00/Tc)/1 . - I /<.)_. 114/0 • ,,, .--c.), __ 1000 _.. -x c, I/4-TY 0 A/ • . a 2,co/cy . I 00 e e900 • _ 3c)0G, . • 1 . _ ,, ckosE 61477647 _ivy - -,,,_mcgAvv.) .5707 /A-/ c 171 Cis• - 60 /e—F / &c — ti -C----/-v-p- -66.-1-1 –/6-0- -/- 400- IS 3 pv cii• C-1--/ 61P/L/L: 9 f)0 3 6 0,00 i! L/7_9 93 • . ,I co". Ty A,a y 2O 2_ 3/S7?-- ., . ,1 " ,, • 4-/vci/./.6--6--x.:,,,t, /070 c.i-. 20407 , . .. . . ;1 / 000 _ S._2: _7-6--7" _.D 0&•-..S' _ ./6> % /"1 c--6-4, i)&--- ce)s-7.-- c),r- - ---- - E--c_o c.,-)--7--/o.--v_ /...,9- __ _________. _ ____ ____. _Fie .6.- •R 4_--7,‘-c=:.,--).-'9e_ _ ----, ___ . . ___ . -------- --- - ------------------------ . -. /)434 pc)-G C,IECA-FL. gy: g, E•ii.-,c-t-4O j\-.,e)2C-79 /1 j /7-OZ. . . . FOP)) ------ - s 7-- c..c. _ —--------------------------__.____ __. /7-E----,' 6t.p.)r p iv_i e..,&--- c)L,,-4,,i717x" c LA_A. z /6 6,777-6 2, .c1,00 /4E_ 7 _ 2, --c)/s,c- L -/_S- .1_ _7_ TYPE .e //-/46--7- . . LS 66,oo/64 / ' . 12,;r6S- . t, oc.7/7-c),,/ 2_3 S 1- ., „ /I s ,64:"..._.)- _p/91/5/-, --,.,/.7- 3 s--o, 0 o/7-(:),,,, - ?D 1S00 ,.. x c4 ii4 7-/0/v . a 2,co/cy • -1_320 _______700 0 0ç: c go S S e t< TT L 1 72. Cogs c-77-j 4S----°°127- 3 6 _ _jcz 6 _ • S i--te T c)7/1'4_ 13-1 21 , . . . .1 . , .. • :. . . - • -2- 4 -- --- A ..--,'-c:), e_ .. . . , . .._ _ . ... • Pcc:- CHL----C/e R /9 - - Fiiri . 4 & ETz- Lcv,s/- 0 l2A/v6 t ,4)1-22 -- T ).s• _ _ / ce- LAypv TIT C 1 D 6-1 c•2 cl< _ /S-o • 2 TyPE 8 //,./66:---7- a.sa,5-;00/64 9 • , • " • •• „ ,84 / /S$' • 3 2 P/91/5/-, b2k/ 3 ;1 1 )< C4 i/47-7 0/s/ • ..,.co/c/ ac29 • Coo . c>,---= L S 3000 • ,7 000 • - S 2 7 623 •• • ..• - . co A/ T1A/ EA/C y • -- ; . • . . !! . To 2-,31._ /v 6-72/e /57/ o COO , • if • ,f 4( 7- /7-1/ E ____' _•R 4 -0?-4„ • • /,-)4,34 _ _ ' • K ST. 1 -K" PL. ST. t & < P. < < rn O rn rn in m x r > > • o Q SAN -"IOU( OR. -) -1-:t''� OSIER RA / WY i SIERRA WY,roi p� r t m > SIERRA WYE ti N rn = m D x > •i [n PALOMAR DR. r m< Z z rn - z "L" ST 4- D rn . O 1,11 0 MN WESTBY ST. 1. + ARIZONA V. AR120NA _ ST Y i — + � �S�o K E rig 4 MOSS i j ST . . • p * s ....w "1 r O x -n ST r WYKES . o= = 0 MMST O ASHFOURTN O Z WELTON LN. r CRESTED BUTTE ST . NICKMAN * 0 \ ST. + < D + m < < < < - MMCLARISS ST. } m N rn o I NAPLES ST . MN 1- Z o - [5 a rn r — 0 EMERSON ST. C Z M• • • . S. r QUEEN ANNE DR. n -I a! > C m - IM 0 rn rn C = o >h r1 < z OXFORD o ST. rn > .1- �" e } . .HY LN. O 74 • 2 A o O 00 * 4/0M 0 q a INN a 1 I.3 a.e 404 R m 11 -I f 1m • sr ' T - ORSETT ST. CB JJJ,,, PAI.OMAFix ST. 10r DAD > OCOEL CT. PRESTON m Hy sr m= m > m.:,,,,._ r LN v 6r s Y. o - ANITA EL LORD ST. a fCV' 'RSA)' CT z w JUNECT m • a r in II; < 2. C r Y rn 13-..< 0 m > O xp 2 N44. F .r QUINTARI ,H/T, 4 k • /t..t.).:.......s.s........ss, rn a Sfree.1r lrrvl rovemeni•S On F% Ftk Ave. - - L +o 0rar,ie., );4 34 PROJECT NUMBER •n� ` City of Chula Vista PROJECT TITLE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT REQUEST Emerson Street between Fourth Ave. & Fifth Ave. - Street Alignment & Improvements (Design Only) INSTRUCTIONS ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT ATTACH A LOCATION PLAT ATTACH COPY OF COST ESTIMATE ,Engineering 4OJECT LOCATION PROPOSED FT'S Emerson Street between Fourth Avenue and Fifth Avenue 88-89 ZOJECT DESCRIPTION Construct alignment of street between cul-de-sacs and ultimate street imporvements. Ultimate improvements include: curb, gutter, sidewalk, driveways, 56 feet of double box culvert 6' width X 3' height and approximately 10 feet of road widening on west end. IOJECT JUSTIFICATION • Project was initiated by the Community Development Block Grant Committee for the Montgomery Area. Completion of this project will complete the ultimate street improvements on this segment of Emerson Street. FUNDING :CURRING PROJECT COSTS PROPOSED SOURCE OF FUNDS Routine Maintenance ITAL ESTIMATED COSTS t THOUSANDS I FY 88-89 Design $15 • FY 89-90 Construction $219 Block. Grant SCHEDULING IVIRONMENTAL DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION FY 8$=89 Design FY 89-90 Construction I. S. Required APPROVAL PARTMENT HEAD DATE COMMENTS This is the first of a two phase project to align Emerson Street and construct the ultimate street improvements. The first phase will consist of plan preparation and environmental review studies. The second phase will consist of the actual construction work. E.125 COST ESTIMATE FORM �� ~` PREPARED BY: J STEINER CHECKED BY: R SAUCEDO DATE: 2/12/86 LATEST UPDATE: 2/12/86 PROJECT TITLE: EMERSON ST BTWN FOURTH AV & FIFTH AV — STREET ALIGNMENT & IMPR PRIORITY: 4 PROPOSED FUNDING SOURCE: BLOCK GRANT COST BREAKDOWN LINE # ITEM NAME UNIT UNIT COST QUANT TOTAL 1 CURB & GUTTER TYPE 0 (G-2) ' LF 11. 00 1864 $20,526 2 SIDEWALK 4 IN PCC (G-7. 1 ) SF 3. 00 9330 $27, 990 3 DRIVEWAY 6 IN PCC SF 3. 25 3564 $11 , 583 4 DOUBLE BOX CULVERT B=6 H=3 LF 500.00 56 $28,000 5 GRADING EMBANKMENT/EXCAVATION CY 4. 50 400 $1, 800 6 EXPORTED CUT CY 7.50 400 $3,000 7 AGGREGATE BASE TONS 21. 00 270 $5^670 8 ASPHALT CONC MISC PAVING rows 75. 00 180 $13, 500 9 PROT & REST EXIST IMPROVEMENTS: [S 1000. 00 5 T5, 000 10 RIGHT OF WAY—SINGLE FAMILY Ls 5000.00 6 $ 30, 000 SUBTOTAL $147`069 SUBTOTAL X CONTINGENCY OF 207. $29, 414 �- � ENGINEERING 15000 X FULL COST RECOVERY 1 . 731 $25,965 GRAND TOTAL ROUNDED OFF TO NEAREST $1000 ( 1986 Dollars ) $202, 000 GRAND TOTAL ROUNDED OFF TO NEAREST $I000 ( 1989 Dollars ) $234 ,000 - ` / JJ , NAPLES SIT: • CY - m7. --1 -1=1- EMERSON m _ rn. • k xxxx'Nekv . , . ) • -- -F • I I QUEIEI\ A NiE Dk • • PROJECT LOCATION 1 MO k.. 1 LI DRAWN BY TITLE — EMERSON ST BTWN FOURTH AVE & DATE FIFTH AVE — STREET ALIGNMENT & IMPR a/5-to 6 METRO FOOD PROJECT, INC. 810E Street Chula Vista, California 92011 Ifi86 - rk, . 2V (619)425-8649 Helen L. Motto APR 8 i,9 4 -4403 Executive Director CITY OF i.:HoLi: VISTA Millie Lutmer Beity rews CITY CLERK'S Crflig Treasurer Secretary Zfl''2--7,,l 7. / ,P ' e-L4-vt.-4_4L ' 4LLAidui 1-/—;-6 / yi 4 , -ed:e3-1.1 j -1-,i ,a-1-i--/Z .4 L.1:57. 4. 4(,) ..._4t: 7 I / ----rk vi /I—A-4/ i 2. ,---2,,c■. .e ,,./_7-44' Z/9 ilWel44) =1) 44, 131 / ,i---t- 1../ /.„) .,.,; ":1i Zt_i_. , i A te./4./ S,,e4_,, / ,/.1,6, xi_i_e__,, ,,z_t_/-4,2 ,,Zi--eA.Z---,o__L,, ,..„---).„-e___ -15-e----,f AD -41-0--- 41 - - Zut 61--(Z--/ 4 ' - , ,44-1,‘,) („2-1.-eet_ i_c/I------y--/ ----71 r.?_A-.P"e_ ) ,,jj Y • f,-__17, ,------Z2.-_,LA.7-t:2--a...) ---7-------e--d-A--4-f-Ne---1.-7 s '7),7 A "tea --e...,..rez„--,4, 14-- 71...e...„- .,....,,e e-i.)-L) , >7 7 d / ir, tii,4 4,-- , _.eLzi- 7 -1,‘„.„ ,,_4,4,t-- 7- ziii, ,.a ' -,i , ,:,--,-„,/ 4 00 /,S,J2.., d_,Te /.,..A.r-ti"....) /A-rel--LAYsi-,c, ,SN 61-ve-4L, , )e-iv,_,( .7---ta' t i P..9 f.4--i-,---a-2-, .4/ PL/1,70-/-'72e , ,,,,,,,e, , i . ..,v4-,,,,,,,4:7-k,:„.) . 66-49 , — ..ii4 , -.. I ti eLezi.--eZ iffl 6to, 4....0_4,1...-e--___a-a„, 41 VI )4"c2/ . e ,tidas,-._.) .el--,e_ . 11.r 7q?"7 6 A-1 6-4-11 ' ot, "---f-,i /t-4J '. / / ti 0 „,...7/0_11.e._ 6/ .. ...,....r_v_e___ , • 62.,,,...4 41,,, . , t i _Lt(23_i _)_„..,46,_AA,ii „- / ___e_y/ ..7)/L-et - ) . .L. 4,, 1 I • : %, % v✓ V c i v"\./ _ "` to/ , 12_,er ___, ervi--�— Q- ...74„/e, / l / ,, COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item 14 Meeting Date 4/8/86 ITEM TITLE: Ordinance Amending Section 10.56.020 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code Increasing Current Meter Rates Resolution 043:3 Changing the Duration of Meters Located in the Town Centre I Redevelopment Project Area SUBMITTED BY: Deputy City Attorney 4 ', The proposed amendment to Section 10.56.020 would allow the City Council to increase current meter fees and the resolution would allow the City Council to change the duration of meters in several locations. RECOMMENDATION: Place Ordinance on First Reading and approve the resolution BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: N/A DISCUSSION: At its February 18, 1986 meeting, the City Council accepted the recommendations of the Town Centre Project Area Committee to increase the rate of meter fees, and at its March 18, 1986 meeting, the City Council approved recommendations to increase meter fees for ten hour and four hour meters and changes in the duration of meters in several locations. Section 10.56.020 establishes current fee rates for parking meters. The attached amendment to the ordinance would allow the City Council to increase the current meter fees and would make all meters 10¢ per hour. The resolution would change the duration of meters in several locations in the Town Centre I Redevelopment Project area. FISCAL IMPACT: The cost to convert the meters currently in service is estimated to be 3,000. If the proposed changes in meter fees (including those made at the PAC's March 6 meeting) are approved by the City Council, it is projected that meter revenues in 1986-87 will increase by approximately 60 percent. 1984-85 1986-87 Revenue Projected On-Street Meters 60,221 $ 76,765 Off-Street Meters 22,608 55,888 $82,829 $132,653 1389a />1°F° .__ .,: . . . EXHIBIT A . . I N ... . • . . j . . . , i _ W 9 . ....-. . I . rq . an 4 , . ...... , ■: • ;•.! :< -... I ....4 •, .....H'? Y . ... • D '...."-------------1 1 ,1 . . . r- 1 1 . . . ti . I" • L I I .i ! ........ • 1 . , uz........... , 1, ,...s -z\.....4. to -,::.,,:i ..,...' . .it ...L. . L........:■1 ,4., • 1....,'.t............ ,....),- -r ...4. %.... .'., ■Cr ...zz, \ : -1 . '..t:Z.."k.' .-- k•4 ..,t- ...„, A. . -le ., ..,_ ,,,.. -... --: tr) K..;.3j., - .4- ...... Is...) ‘t.'1- cis" l.'s ,, . , - C ---■•. ...... ki 0 Sp!-IL7 ,...n .,,,.. . ....i. f • - I . .. II) k ',.. ',... `II:I:: '-'-'.7',1 , .L.I 1 , ‘44'11 -' -;7' 1'* kr., IC --■.-" , , --- ..4-...--, ,....., ,..., ,_,-,,,,-- 1 ,... ..., ... , . cz... ., ..c,, . .... ..,-.. .... I V , ,',' •;,,.' .'1. -•. , - ■.,''.0-.1. . . '15 .9 I F. : ... , .