Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Statement 1986/01/28 Item 5 COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item 5 Meeting Date 1/28/86 / / f ITEM TITLE: Resolution 4Z ' 3 Approving the revised San Diego Regional Solid Waste Management Plan - 1982-2000 SUBMITTED BY: Director of Public Works/City Engineer REVIEWED BY: City Manage (4/5ths Vote: Yes No X ) Because of the two proposed waste disposal sites in the County of San Diego (Ysidora land fill at Camp Pendleton and SANDER Project at Miramar) , San Diego County needs to revise the Regional Solid Waste Management Plan. RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt a resolution approving the revisions to the San Diego Regional Solid Waste Management Plan, 1982-2000. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable. DISCUSSION: The current San Diego Regional Solid Waste Management Plan provides that the waste shed for the SANDER Project be primarily south of Interstate 8. This is due to the fact that originally the SANDER Project was proposed to be located in Chula Vista. Since the Council did not reserve a site for SANDER and has indicated that they did not want a waste energy site within the city limits of Chula Vista, the new proposal is for the SANDER Project to be located at Miramar. This plan revision would incorporate that change. Since the Ysidora land fill is located north of Oceanside in Camp Pendleton, Chula Vista staff in a cursory review of the application finds no reason to object to the permit as having any significant impact on Chula Vista and, therefore, recommends approval of the resolution. FISCAL IMPACT: None. JPL:nr/ WPC 1844E oP ' _.-e . iI; __ r°u1pOirrt. OStVE IS . �0 � FA i �'�' COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO 0- �5�DIEGp , DCCC�\a M DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING 2 5555 OVERLAND AVENUE H.E. SORLIE, Director (Acting) SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92123 Offices of: TELEPHONE: (619) 565-5177 County Engineer November 5, 1985 County Road Commissioner County Surveyor County Airports Flood Control Liquid Waste Solid Waste Transportation Operations Mr. John Goss, City Manager City of Chula Vista 276 4th Avenue . Chula Vista, CA 92010 Dear Mr. Goss: Subject: Revised San Diego Regional Solid Waste Management Plan, 1982-2000 - Amendment for the Proposed Ysidora Landfill at Camp Pendleton Marine Corps Base and the SANDER Project at Miramar Government Code § 66784 specifies that no person shall establish sites for solid waste disposal not in conformance with the approved County Solid Waste Management Plan (CoSWMP). Because of changes in the wasteshed, site and quantity of waste to be processed, the California Waste Management Board advised that the discussion of the SANDER Project in the existing CoSWMP must be updated and amended to reflect these changes before a conformance finding with the existing CoSWMP can be made. The United States Marine Corps (USMC) has requested that the existing CoSWMP be amended to include the proposed Ysidora Landfill at Camp Pendleton so that the County can make a Finding of Conformance with the CoSWMP as part of the facility permitting process. In accordance with Government Code §66784 an amendment to the CoSWMP is being processed by the County to include the proposed Ysidora Landfill at Camp Pendleton and the SANDER Project at Miramar. The Board of Supervisors adopted a resolution approving the CoSWMP Amendment for the projects on October 29, 1985 subject to approval by the incorporated cities. State law [Government Code §66780.5(c)] requires that any . amendment to the CoSWMP be approved by a majority of the cities within the County which contain a majority of the population of the incorporated area. Specific information on the CoSWMP Amendment is discussed below. 2- SANDER Project Specific text changes (Attachment #1) for the SANDER Project CoSWMP Amendment include replacing existing pages V-6 through V-12 and Appendix A-V-3 with an updated discussion on the project wasteshed, site, quantity of waste to the processed and permitting requirements; deletion of the discussion regarding incinerator residue on page VIII-16 because the State Department of Health Services has classified the fly ash, bottom ash and flue gas emission control residues to be generated by the SANDER Project as non-hazardous; revision of the discussion of the composition of the SANDER Board of Directors on page X-4 to reflect the current composition of that Board, composed of two members from the County Board of Supervisors and two members from the San Diego City Council . The Implementation Schedule on page 19 is also being revised to reflect timing of the project construction and start-up. County Counsel has advised that Section 15271 of the State CEQA Guidelines exempts from CEQA review the CoSWMP Amendment for the SANDER Project since the SANDER Project is a thermal power plant subject to the permitting requirements of the California Energy Commission (CEC) , a process that is functionally the equivalent of the CEQA process. The County Department of Planning and Land Use has prepared a Notice of Exemption for the project (Attachment �"Z) A draft Notice of Exemption is included which each incorporated city should complete, sign and file with the County Clerk as required by CEQA's process for Notices of Exemption following approval of the SANDER Project Amendment (Attachment #3). Ysidora Landfill Specific text changes (Attachment #4) for the Ysidora Landfill CoSWMP Amendment include revising pages 20 and I1I-27 to include information on the operation of the landfill and projected implementation date. An environmental assessment pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) was prepared for the Ysidora Landfill project by the Marine Corps. A finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) was issued by the Marine Corps Command in April of 1984. The Department of Planning and Land Use, Environmental Analysis Division, recommended that a Negative Declaration be issued for the proposed project on September 2.6, 1985 (Attachment #5) . A draft Notice of Determination has been prepared for the Ysidora Landfil ' CoSWMP Amendment and should be filed with the County Clerk and Office of Planning and Research following approval by your city (Attachment. #6) . A.he time involved in securing permits for these facilities, the Due to .. .me 9 CoSNMP Amendment for the Camp Pendleton and SANDER Projects is being processed at this time rather than with the formal plan revision process, estimated to be completed by late 1986, which you were advised of by letters dated August 8, and September tember 10, 1985. }},t S. F -3- As mentioned previously, COSWMP Amendments must be approved by a majority of the cities with a majority of the population of the incorporated area. Please contact the Solid Waste Division so that a hearing date for this matter can be arranged. Department staff will be available to attend the necessary hearing and will work with your staff on the report to your Council . A draft Resolution of Approval is included (Attachment #7) . If your City fails to act within 90 days after receiving the amendment, (i .e. , February 7, 1986) , State law deems it to be approved [Government Code §66780.5(c)] . If you have any questions please call Sharon J. Reid, Solid Waste Program Manager, at 565-3987. Very truly yours, ‘) ): 1. j H.E. SORLIE, Director (Acting) - - Department of Public Works HES:JMQ:tjh Attachments • ATTACHMENT #1 • Chapter V • The proposed San Diego Energy Recovery (SANDER ) project is a joint County and City of San Diego effort . The proposed project would utilize mass burning, technology, i . e. , combustion of municipal solid waste (MSW) instead of other fuels such as coal or oil to produce steam or electricity. • The waste is unloaded directly into a pit in an enclosed building, then overhead cranes transfer the waste to moving grates where it is burned at temperatures in excess of 1800' E . The heat produced using this process is captured as steam which can be converted into electricity and sold . In the proposed project enough energy will be produced to provide electricity to approximately 60,000 homes . - Revenues received from energy sales and waste disposal fees will be.-used to pay for the facility. Revenue from recyclable materi - • al-s is not included in the current financial plan ; however, the proposed Service agreement gives the City the unilateral right to recycle waste materials and receive the resulting income at any time the City finds it economically prudent to do so . A study is currently underway 'to determine recycli.ng options and feasibility. • 'yam The proposed site for the SANDER Project is a U . S. Navy owned / " parcel adjacent to a completed portion of the S . E . Miramar Landfill and a mile south of the current West Miramar Landfill making traffic , topography, zoning and nearby land use compatible with waste to energy development . The proposed site is to be acquired through a property exchange between the U. S . Navy and the City of San Diego . San Diego voters and Congress have approved the exchange ; an appraisal and negotiation of the exchange values of the respective pieces of property is still in progress . Wasteshed The SANDER Project will primarily serve the City of San Diego . The wasteshed area encompasses the entire City limits with the exception of the San Ysidro area, which is served by the Otay landfill . Some peripheral areas of the County and adjacent cities such as Del Mar, Lemon Grove, Poway and National City (where haulers routes overlap jurisdictional boundaries) are also y part of the wasteshed . In 1989 , the scheduled date for commencement of SANDER operations , the City of San Diego expects to have 1 . 3 million tons annually of waste requiring disposal . The SANDER facility will be designed to process 52% , or up to 680 ,000 tons , of that waste annually using three 750 ton per day boilers , totaling 2250 tons per day. Add- ional waste will be available for recycling and the SANDER °.; ...-.��. - -• �._.. ,.........�....�...._rrs`.-.r.n.-f.,n..,-v...v+..wl l..... .-v..-.`+.r•..•.r 1.�..i _...1 a...._.4. _. .+.."wr'r S....+....»+.+wAa a. -...nwy. • Project is currently conducting a feasibility study on mechanical separation of recyclables from the waste stream. The SANDER facility is' sized so that sufficient waste is available in the wasteshed for both waste to energy and recycling. Ash Residue - The SANDER facility is designed to process approximately 2250 tons of solid waste per day, reducing the volume by approximately 90% and the weight by 80%. Approximately 600 tons per day of ash residue will be generated and disposed of at the City of San Diego ' s Miramar landfill _ The California Department of Health Services has classified the fly ash, bottom ash and flue gas emission control residues to be generated by the SANDER Project as nonhazardous . This classification was made based on an application submitted by the SANDER Project describing the characteristics of the waste stream and the combustion process . ' SB #2292, passed in 1984, codified this classification and similar classifications made by the Department of Health Services for other resource recovery facilities throughout the state. ..-Commitment of Waste- Assured commitments of waste are normally -"evidenced by (1 ) Tegal controls , including the Federal and State consit'utions , legislation , and court rulings implementing the . "police power" authority to regulate- collection and disposal of solid waste; and (2 ) voluntary long-term agreements entered into by the different local government agencies served to deliver waste to the facility until bond repayment is accomplished. The legal authority of the County and City of San Diego to commit waste to SANDER is substantial . Both government agencies have extensive police powers granted by the State Constitution and the Legislature to regulate the .collection and disposal of solid waste within their respective jurisdictions . For example, the Nejedly-Z 'berg-Dill Solid Waste Management and Resource Recovery Act of 1972 ( Government Code Section 66700 et . seq . ) delegates primary responsibility for solid waste planning and management to local governments, with the County being assigned a primary role. Government Code #66787 authorizes local agencies to enter into contracts with business entities for waste-to --energy plants and provides that bonds may be issued to finance those plants . County Code Section 68 .511 permits the County to direct collected solid waste to the facility which best_ suits the interest and needs of the County. It should be noted that determination of waste sources for waste to energy projects is subject to approval by the California Waste Management Board and the local Enforcement Agency . In addition to legal controls , the County and the City of San Diego have strong practical control in that they own the only disposal sites within a reasonable hauling distance of the SANDER facility. The waste which will be directed to SANDER is currently - 2 - .r . going to the City ' s Miramar landfi'lI . Prior to the issuance of, bonds for the design and construction of the SANDER facility, the City of San Diego will enter into a long-term service agreement with the owner/operator of the SANDER facility . Included in the service agreement will be a guarantee by the City of San Diego to deliver waste to SANDER for the period of the bond indebtedness . Recycling - The SANDER Board of Directors, the City and the County support recycling as a compatable activity with the SANDER Project and encourage increased recycling in order to reduce the waste- stream for disposal and to conserve our natural resources . Current recycling activities in the SANDER wasteshed include: o Fourteen permanent recycling operations , seven of which have annual gross revenues of over one million dollars o According to a survey conducted in the SANDER wasteshed , reflecting the period January 1983 to December 1983: - Over 7 , 200 tons of -aluminum cans were recycled. This represents a 55% recycling rate. - Over 35 ,000 tans of newsprint were recycled, representing 45% recycling rate. - An estimated 27 , 000 tons of cardboard, 8, 800 tons of high grade ledger paper and 33 tons of plastics were recycled. To achieve the SANDER Project ' s objective of increased recycling in the San Diego area, the SANDER Project is in the process of planning to : • Encourage Increased Private Sector Recycling Although there is a viable network of volunteer and commercial buy-back centers , the marketplace allows for additional activity. An increase in the number of locations would make recycling more convenient and raise the recycling rate. Presently the City of San Diego is pursuing the establishment of a buy-back center for recyclable materials at the Miramar landfill . • Insure That An Adequate Information and Referral Service is Available to Citizens In order to best serve the citizens of San Diego, it is - 3 - necessary to have a recycling information clearinghouse. This information clearinghouse function is being performed by the San Diego Ecology Center which is supported financially by the City and County of San Diego . o Support Public Education Regarding Waste Reduction and Product Waste A need exists to educate the public that recycling ' s aim is to achieve a no-waste society. The SANDER Project staff is work- ing and coordinating this educational effort with the San Diego Ecology Centre and the I Love A Clean San Diego Program. The SANDER Project is currently funding the Ecology Center to conduct community presentations regarding recycling. o Encourage the Inclusion of San Diego Businesses in an Indust- rial Waste Exchange - The SANDER Project staff is exploring the possibilities of a . waste exchange for the SANDER wasteshed _ This waste exchange • coirld help conserve energy and resources while reducing waste management problems _and disposal costs . By exchanging various • raw materials between firms with specific material needs and companies with no further use for those materials , certain substances can be made available at an attractive cost . A consultant study has been completed which identifies firms produces hazardous waste and reviews waste exchange programs operating in other areas . o Access the Feasibity of Mechanical Separation at the Miramar Landfill . The SANDER Project has hired a consultant to complete a feasi - bility study evaluating proven mechanical recovery methods for separating materials from solid waste. The study will deter- mine if a mechanical separation system is available that will reliably and economically sort residential and/or commercial waste, and whether regional markets will provide sufficient revenue to support such a facility. Recycling has become more attractive in the 1980 's due to increased energy costs , shortage of domestic raw materials and the instability associated with foreign derived raw materials . Indeed , to a large degree our ability to maintain our economic well -being and to preserve a livable environment will be related to our ability to increase our rate of recycling. A flexible system that provides both energy and materials from municipal solid waste fits the future recycling trends and is supported by the SANDER Board of Directors . As the decade passes it will be necessary to find the correct balance to (I ) solve the - 4 - • City and County ' s solid waste disposal problem, ( 2) recover all the materials that are feasible to remove from municipal solid waste, and ( 3 ) convert to useful energy that portion which cannot be recycled . An important part of overall planning for SANDER is a comprehen- sive program to encourage and increase recycling in the SANDER service area. Through coordination of recycling and energy recovery activities , materials and energy that are presently being thrown away will be taken out of the waste stream and put to productive reuse. SANDER provides an alternative to filling San Diego ' s urban open space areas with refuse. Without SANDER, open space will continue to be used as landfills and new sites will be located far from urban areas , thus significantly increasing hauling costs and resulting in higher vehicle emmissions and increasing the number and length of trips on the region ' s street network . Additional discussion of the SANDER Project is included in the Appendix SUMMARY The County and the City of San Diego have taken an active role in promoting and furthering resource recovery. During the period of this Revision ( 1982-85 ) : 1 . The County and City of San Diego will continue the planning and implementation of SANDER . 2 . The County Board l °� waste Supervisors ement the shalgicontinueplanning assess authority for so 9 the applicability of resource recovery for other regions of the County. . 3 . . The City of San Diego will commit wastes in the SANDER waste- shed to the project for the period of bond indebtedness . 4 . The County and City will support increased recycling and reuse of valuable resources in the wasteshed of SANDER or any ` resource recovery facility . 5 . The County and City will work with state agencies to increase cooperation and support of resource recovery. • • - 5 -