HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Statement 1985/08/27 Item 10 COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item 10
Meeting Date 8/27/85
ITEM TITLE: a. Resolution 62 /-C-C) Approving an agreement with George
Simpson for Project Management Services for the EastLake
Financial Plan
b. Resolution / A- 15-3 Approving an agreement with
F. MacKenzie Brown, Inc. , Bond Counsel , Wildan Associates,
Engineering Consultant, and Kadie-Jensen and Johnson,
Financial Consultants
00,7
SUBMITTED BY: Director of Public�,WWorks/City Engineer
REVIEWED BY: City Manager )C� (4/5ths Vote: Yes No X )
On February 26, 1985, Council adopted the EastLake I SPA which included
approval of a development agreement and the Public Facilities Financing Plan.
It is now appropriate to implement the Public Facilities Financial Plan and it
is recommended that the agreements with the above consultants be approved.
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt resolutions approving agreements.
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: N/A
DISCUSSION:
As part of the approval for the EastLake I development, Council adopted the
Public Facilities Financing Plan which was prepared by Wedin Enterprises and
which recommended methods of providing the public facility infrastructure
needed to serve EastLake. It covered not only the typical subdivision
requirements of streets, drainage, sewer and water, but also looked at
off-site water facilities, off-site major road facilities, parks, schools,
fire station and transportation center. That report looked at several
different issues and recommended certain facilities be completed by
subdivision requirements, others be completed by Mello-Roos taxing district,
and others by a combination of an FBA; assessment districts; etc. The
Facilities Plan included a staging program for the development of the entire
eastern area anticipated to be developed by the time EastLake I was
completed. The plan looked at all of the major street facilities in the
eastern area, and required certain facilities to be installed prior to the
cumulative number of building permits issued from all of the developments in
that area. The plan anticipated other developments such as Bonita Meadows,
Mount Vista, Bonita Long Canyon, Charter Point, El Rancho del Rey, and Terra
Nova, as well as EastLake. It proposed primary methods of financing and
secondary methods of financing for each of 52 projects.
d �
Page 2, Item 10
Meeting Date 8/27/85
CONSULTANT SELECTION
The consulting team is comprised of a project manager, an engineering firm, an
assessment and bond attorney, and a financial consultant. The task of this
team will be to review in detail the Public Facilities Financial Plan, test
the feasibility for the recommended financing mechanisms for each project, and
recommend for each project the 1 ) funding mechanism, 2) which development
project is responsible, and to what degree, 3) when each project will be
needed, and 4) complete necessary studies to implement the funding mechanism.
It is proposed to have two agreements for this work, one with the project
manager and another one with the support consultants. The project manager
will be George Simpson, an individual who has had extensive experience with
the City of San Diego in establishing financing mechanisms for development.
In fact, he has been involved in over 10 successful major community plans
which have established financing programs for the infrastructure. These
programs are very similar to what Chula Vista will be doing in the eastern
area. He will act as a consultant to the City of Chula Vista to advise us in
working with the support consulting team and, also, to direct the activities
of that team. Since City staff presently has no one on staff that has been
involved with a venture of this complexity and magnitude, it is staff's
intention to learn from Mr. Simpson, and as future districts are established
in the eastern area; to be able to take over his role with in-house staff.
It is difficult to advertise for consultants for a project of this nature
since very few of these types of financing programs have been done in
California. However, we did receive proposals from two groups of consultants,
the first group being the parties recommended in the resolution. The second
group was headed by Deloitte Haskins & Sells who utilized the expertise of the
following consultants: engineering consultant, C2HM Hill , assessment
engineering consultant, Nestie Burdin and Stone; financial consultant,
Fieldman & Rolapp; and legal counsel , Jones Hall , Hill & White. A staff
committee composed of the Assistant City Manager, the Finance Director, the
Planning Director, the Assistant City Attorney and the Director of Public
Works/City Engineer reviewed both the proposals and interviewed the
consultants. The committee selected the group comprising Wildan Associates,
MacKenzie Brown, Kadie-Jensen and Johnson as the recommended consulting team
with the leadership of George Simpson because they felt that this group had
more direct pertinent past experience for this type of project than the other
team. The support consultants have had direct experience in both Mello-Roos
Districts and FBA' s. In making the final selection, the committee considered
very highly the specific expertise of each consultant and the consultant's
ability to deliver the end product in the amount of time necessary to meet
EastLake' s time schedule.
MacKenzie Brown has been legal counsel for assessment districts in Chula
Vista, and is one of the foremost assessment attorneys in California. Wildan
Inc. has been involved in several large public financing projects including
Mello-Roos Acts as well as major public improvement districts using assessment
district financing. Wildan was the traffic consultant to the City' s E.I.R.
consultant to evaluate the EastLake Plan, so that firm is familiar with this
project.
Page 3, Item 10
Meeting Date 8/27/85
It is proposed that the majority of the consultant' s work will be completed
within 120 days. All the necessary engineering information, legal , and
financial recommendations will be completed so the Council can make a clear
decision and move into public hearing process to establish the legal
mechanisms to produce the necessary funding programs. Robert Santos, Vice
President, EastLake Development Company, has met with the selected development
consulting team and supports staff's recommendation to adopt the two
resolutions.
FACILITIES BENEFIT ASSESSMENT
One of the most complicated aspects of this Facilities Financing Plan is the
Facilities Benefit Assessment District. This is complicated by the fact that
it would involve property owners both within the City of Chula Vista and
outside the City of Chula Vista.
The facilities benefit assessment district is a pay-as-you-go assessment
district very similar to the "H" Street program that was adopted by Council
several years ago. Assessment spreading principles are used to equitably
apportion the costs of the facilities like an Assessment District, but, unlike
an Assessment District, no bonds are sold to obtain money for construction.
Due to the above factors and the fact that this project includes many more
streets than the "H" Street Program, it is anticipated that this FBA will
require a lot of work and coordination between the different property owners,
and City staff does not have the expertise or time to do this project. The
consultant will set up the facilities benefit assessment district including
the necessary maps, agreements, and calculations to spread the cost, set up in
such a fashion that the City staff could, with the aid of micro computers,
maintain the FBA over a period of years. Once the consultant's work is
completed, the City Council could then conduct the necessary public hearings
and adopt the necessary resolutions.
MELLO-ROOS ACT
The Public Facilities Plan prepared by Wedin Enterprises suggested the use of
the Mello-Roos taxing district to fund the following improvements: water
facilities, community park, high school , elementary school , fire station, and
transportation center. The aggregate total of these facilities equals
$20,813,000. Since these consultants have successfully established other
Mello-Roos districts, they will more closely test the feasibility for each of
the 52 improvements and either include them in a proposed Mello-Roos district
and/or make other suggestions.
FISCAL IMPACT: The total cost of all the consultants will be charged on an
hourly basis as provided for in their agreement, not to exceed specific
amount.amount. EastLake will pay the entire cost. Because it is typical t the
bond counsel and the financial consultant receive their fee as a percent of
the bond sale, r in t work in this
process will
credi ted towar ds the final work in preparing the perspective and the bond
counsel 's opinion.
JPL:nr/
WPC 1621E
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item 10
Meeting Date 8/27/85
ITEM TITLE: a. Resolution / -/fib Approving an agreement with George
Simpson for Project Management Services for the EastLake
Financial Plan
b. Resolution A-2-45C3 Approving an agreement with
F. MacKenzie Brown, Inc. , Bond Counsel , Wildan Associates,
Engineering Consultant, and Kadie-Jensen and Johnson,
Financial Consultants
SUBMITTED BY: Director of Public Works/City Engineer
REVIEWED BY: City Manager i647 ' (4/5ths Vote: Yes No X )
On February 26, 1985, Council adopted the EastLake I SPA which included
approval of a development agreement and the Public Facilities Financing Plan.
It is now appropriate to implement the Public Facilities Financial Plan and it
is recommended that the agreements with the above consultants be approved.
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt resolutions approving agreements.
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: N/A
DISCUSSION:
As part of the approval for the EastLake I development, Council adopted the
Public Facilities Financing Plan which was prepared by Wedin Enterprises and
which recommended methods of providing the public facility infrastructure
needed to serve EastLake. It covered not only the typical subdivision
requirements of streets, drainage, sewer and water, but also looked at
off-site water facilities, off-site major road facilities, parks, schools,
fire station and transportation center. That report looked at several
different issues and recommended certain facilities be completed by
subdivision requirements, others be completed by Mello-Roos taxing district,
and others by a combination of an FBA; assessment districts; etc. The
Facilities Plan included a staging program for the development of the entire
eastern area anticipated to be developed by the time EastLake I was
completed. The plan looked at all of the major street facilities in the
eastern area, and required certain facilities to be installed prior to the
cumulative number of building permits issued from all of the developments in
that area. The plan anticipated other developments such as Bonita Meadows,
Mount Vista, Bonita Long Canyon, Charter Point, El Rancho del Rey, and Terra
Nova, as well as EastLake. It proposed primary methods of financing and
secondary methods of financing for each of 52 projects.
Page 2, Item 10
Meeting Date 8/27/85
CONSULTANT SELECTION
The consulting team is comprised of a project manager, an engineering firm, an
assessment and bond attorney, and a financial consultant. The task of this
team will be to review in detail the Public Facilities Financial Plan, test
the feasibility for the recommended financing mechanisms for each project, and
recommend for each project the 1 ) funding mechanism, 2) which development
project is responsible, and to what degree, 3) when each project will be
needed, and 4) complete necessary studies to implement the funding mechanism.
It is proposed to have two agreements for this work, one with the project
manager and another one with the support consultants. The project manager
will be George Simpson, an individual who has had extensive experience with
the City of San Diego in establishing financing mechanisms for development.
In fact, he has been involved in over 10 successful major community plans
which have established financing programs for the infrastructure. These
programs are very similar to what Chula Vista will be doing in the eastern
area. He will act as a consultant to the City of Chula Vista to advise us in
working with the support consulting team and, also, to direct the activities
of that team. Since City staff presently has no one on staff that has been
involved with a venture of this complexity and magnitude, it is staff's
intention to learn from Mr. Simpson, and as future districts are established
in the eastern area; to be able to take over his role with in-house staff.
It is difficult to advertise for consultants for a project of this nature
since very few of these types of financing programs have been done in
California. However, we did receive proposals from two groups of consultants,
the first group being the parties recommended in the resolution. The second
group was headed by Deloitte Haskins & Sells who utilized the expertise of the
following consultants: engineering consultant, C2HM Hill , assessment
engineering consultant, Nestie Burdin and Stone; financial consultant,
Fieldman & Rolapp; and legal counsel , Jones Hall , Hill & White. A staff
committee composed of the Assistant City Manager, the Finance Director, the
Planning Director, the Assistant City Attorney and the Director of Public
Works/City Engineer reviewed both the proposals and interviewed the
consultants. The committee selected the group comprising Wildan Associates,
MacKenzie Brown, Kadie-Jensen and Johnson as the recommended consulting team
with the leadership of George Simpson because they felt that this group had
more direct pertinent past experience for this type of project than the other
team. The support consultants have had direct experience in both Mello-Roos
Districts and FBA' s. In making the final selection, the committee considered
very highly the specific expertise of each consultant and the consultant' s
ability to deliver the end product in the amount of time necessary to meet
EastLake's time schedule.
MacKenzie Brown has been legal counsel for assessment districts in Chula
Vista, and is one of the foremost assessment attorneys in California. Wildan
Inc. has been involved in several large public financing projects including
Mello-Roos Acts as well as major public improvement districts using assessment
district financing. Wildan was the traffic consultant to the City' s E.I.R.
consultant to evaluate the EastLake Plan, so that firm is familiar with this
project.
!
Page 3, Item 10
Meeting Date 8/27/85
It is proposed that the majority of the consultant' s work will be completed
within 120 days. All the necessary engineering information, legal , and
financial recommendations will be completed so the Council can make a clear
decision and move into public hearing process to establish the legal
mechanisms to produce the necessary funding programs. Robert Santos, Vice
President, EastLake Development Company, has met with the selected development
consulting team and supports staff's recommendation to adopt the two
resolutions.
FACILITIES BENEFIT ASSESSMENT
One of the most complicated aspects of this Facilities Financing Plan is the
Facilities Benefit Assessment District. This is complicated by the fact that
it would involve property owners both within the City of Chula Vista and
outside the City of Chula Vista.
The facilities benefit assessment district is a pay-as-you-go assessment
district very similar to the "H" Street program that was adopted by Council
several years ago. Assessment spreading principles are used to equitably
apportion the costs of the facilities like an Assessment District, but, unlike
an Assessment District, no bonds are sold to obtain money for construction.
Due to the above factors and the fact that this project includes many more
streets than the "H" Street Program, it is anticipated that this FBA will
require a lot of work and coordination between the different property owners,
and City staff does not have the expertise or time to do this project. The
consultant will set up the facilities benefit assessment district including
the necessary maps, agreements, and calculations to spread the cost, set up in
such a fashion that the City staff could, with the aid of micro computers,
maintain the FBA over a period of years. Once the consultant's work is
completed, the City Council could then conduct the necessary public hearings
and adopt the necessary resolutions.
MELLO-ROOS ACT
The Public Facilities Plan prepared by Wedin Enterprises suggested the use of
the Mello-Roos taxing district to fund the following improvements: water
facilities, community park, high school , elementary school , fire station, and
transportation center. The aggregate total of these facilities equals
$20,813,000. Since these consultants have successfully established other
Mello-Roos districts, they will more closely test the feasibility for each of
the 52 improvements and either include them in a proposed Mello-Roos district
and/or make other suggestions.
FISCAL IMPACT: The total cost of all the consultants will be charged on an
hourly basis as provided for in their agreement, not to exceed a specific
amount. EastLake will pay the entire cost. Because it is typical that the
bond counsel and the financial consultant receive their fee as a percent of
the bond sale, a portion of their investigative work in this process will be
credited towards the final work in preparing the perspective and the bond
counsel 's opinion.
J PL:n r/
WPC 1621E