HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Statement 1985/06/25 Item 15 COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item 15
Meeting Date 6/25/85
ITEM TITLE: Resolution /2c2 $ proving Negotiated Property Tax Exchange
and Other Agreements Relating to Montgomery Reorganization
SUBMITTED BY: Director of Financeo' °l
REVIEWED BY: City Manager (4/5ths Vote: Yes No x )
The proposed Montgomery reorganization has been filed with the Local Agency
Formation Commission (LAFCO) and is to be placed on the ballot for November,
1985. State law requires the negotiation of any exchange of property tax
revenues occasioned by jurisdictional changes between the effected County and
City.
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt resolution approving the property tax exchange.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
Negotiations have been held for several weeks with County staff members
regarding the property tax agreement for the proposed Montgomery
reorganization. The attached resolution contains the terms and conditions of
the agreement resulting from the negotiations between the City and the County.
The main feature of the agreement is the application of the Master Property
Tax Agreement to the apportionment of property tax revenues. This means that
the City of Chula Vista will receive 41% of the combined County and detaching
special district's share of the base property tax revenue, with the exclusion
of the County library district. This would produce $601 ,263 in property tax
revenue to the City for application to operating and capital improvement
expenses if Montgomery becomes a part of the City of Chula Vista. The balance
of the pooled base property tax revenue will be transferred to the County
general fund. This division of the property tax between the City and the
County will also apply to the annual property tax increment.
Another main point of the agreement is that if the voters approve the proposed
annexation, then the effective date of the reorganization will be prior to
December 31 , 1935. This will enable the City to begin receiving in fiscal
year 1936-87 property tax revenues associated with the Montgomery
reorganization. The City will contract with the County to provide some
services through June 30, 1936. The City' s goal is to begin providing full
service to the reorganized area as of July 1 , 1986.
The County also agrees, subsequent to annexation, that as long as it is
receiving Community Development Block Grant entitlement funds based on the
demography in Montgomery, the County will allocate these funds to eligible
projects within Montgomery. It is also agreed that any CDBG projects funded
prior to annexation and under construction will be completed by the County.
Page 2, Item 15
Meeting Date 6/25/85
The City agrees not to establish a redevelopment project area within
Montgomery for at least four years after the effective date of the
reorganization. If there is ever a desire to create such a project area, it
probably would take at least this long to educate the community about the
purpose of the redevelopment process, develop the leadership necessary to
support such a district, and go through the procedural steps required to
create such a district. It was concluded that it would not hamper the City s
ability to address the needs in the Montgomery area by deferring any
redevelopment district for this period of time.
The negotiated property tax exchange agreement was approved by the San Diego
County Board of Supervisors on June 18, 1985.
The LAFCO hearing is scheduled for July 1 , 1985.
FISCAL IMPACT: Under the terms of the proposed agreement, the City will
receive 41% of the base property tax revenues and 41% of the annual property
tax increment. In the initial year this produces $601 ,263 in base property
tax revenues for the City of Chula Vista.
WPC 0276G
by tho City
Chula Vista, fCa;i; r.;a
Dated -373'