Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Statement 1985/05/07 Item 7 COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item 7 Meeting Date 5/7/85 ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing: PCM-85-8; Reconsideration of revisions to Casa Del Rey Development Standards - The Helmer Company Resolution 4.W J Adopting revisions to Casa Del Rey Development Standards SUBMITTED BY: Di rector of Planning REVIEWED BY: City Manager fir- (4/5ths Vote: Yes No x ) On April 9, 1985, the City Council unanimously denied the applicant's request to revise the Casa Del Rey Development standards. Due to an oversight, however, the applicant was not represented at the hearing and the Council has therefore granted a request to reconsider the item. The application, filed by the Helmer Company, proposed to revise the height and yard standards for certain lots within the Casa Del Rey Subdivision, located north of Telegraph Canyon Road, east of Paseo Ladera. The development standards for Casa Del Rey were adopted along with the subdivision map by the City Council in 1978 (Resolution 9007) . The proposed revisions are exempt from environmental review. RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt a motion per Planning Commission Resolution PCM-85-8 recommending: 1 ) Approve the proposed revisions to the corner lot height and sideyard setback standards; 2) approve the sideyard setback reduction for three-car garages for a maximum of 33% of the 178 lots. NOTE: A minimum of 10' shall be maintained between dwellings; 3) deny the companion request to modify the frontyard setbacks on East "J" Street. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: The Commission unanimously recommended approval of the staff recommendation. They further agreed that the applicant may return if the demand for three-car garages turns out to be greater than anticipated with the development phasing. , �, . . y Cojncii of C ii.rc', \" sLa, California 7 Page 2, Item Meeting Date 5/7/85 DISCUSSION: Casa Del Rey consists of 220 single family detached lots, 42 of which were developed earlier by the Pardee Company. The Helmer Company now proposes to develop the remaining 178 lots. The proposed revisions to the development standards (see attached) include: increase corner-lot height limits from one and one-half stories or 21 feet to two stories or 25 feet in height for no more than 50% of the corner lots; reduce sideyard requirements from 10' and 3' to 5' and 5' in order to accommodate three-car garages on no more than 50% of the lots; reduce the frontyard setback on East "J" Street for four lots from 35' to 32' , 32' , 30' and 28' respectively. Corner-Lot Height Increase The main purpose of limiting the height on corner lots is to avoid the walled-in effect which can occur at street intersections when unrelieved two-story homes are placed on standard single family lots. In the present case, the applicant has submitted corner-lot plans which combine single and two-story construction, sloping roof lines and staggered elevations. We believe the selective use of these units on no more than 50% of the remaining 25 corner lots would not violate the intent to keep an open appearance at intersections. The two-story plans have a 35-40% smaller footprint, resulting in more open space between dwellings. Reduction in Sideyard Setbacks The request for a reduction in sideyard requirements from 10' and 3' to 5' and 5' for no more than 50% of the lots would allow the developer to implement a three-car garage plan. The primary justification for the 10' and 3' requirement is to provide at least one sideyard with ample width for access of larger items to the rear yard. Where this can be accomplished without a tradeoff in other amenities or features it should be required. Nevertheless, it is essentially a convenience for the homeowner, who may instead prefer a three car garage for an additional vehicle and/or storage. It might also result in cleaning-up the street scene of extra vehicles. Because the construction of three-car garages with these floor plans would result in precluding access to the rear, staff is concerned about authorizing such a high percentage (50%) of lots to vary from the City standards. We believe an allowance of 1/3 of the lots or 33% would be more reasonable. In any event, the 10 ft. minimum distance between adjacent dwellings necessary to maintain adequate light and air would continue to be required. Reduction in Front Setbacks on East "J" Street The applicant is further requesting a reduction in the front setback from 35' to 32' , 32' , 30' and 28' for four of the seven 1 ots fronting on East "3" Street. The sole justification for the reduction appears to be the applicant's desire to maintain a certain unit mix on this frontage--the units proposed for the lots in question being models with a greater depth and thus requiring a reduction in either the front or rear yard setback in order to fit on the lots. 7 Page 3, Item Meeting Date 5/7/85 The traditional single family front setback is 20 feet. However, the 35 ft. setback for lots fronting on East "J" Street was established by the Ranchero SPA Plan development standards in order to provide a more spacious view corridor along this major street. We believe there is no justification to vary from this standard simply to accommodate a variety in unit mix. The applicant has other models which can be accommodated on the lots while maintaining the setback. If necessary, the front elevations of these units could be treated in a different manner to achieve the interest desired. FISCAL IMPACT: Not applicable. WPC 1897P