HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Statement 1985/01/22 Item 7 COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item 7
Meeting Date 1/22/85
ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing - Consideration of Chula Vista Sanitary Service, Inc.
Requested Rate Increase
Resolution//r//. Revising Chula Vista Sanitary Service Collection Rates
SUBMITTED BY: (4/5ths Vote: Yes No X )
Director of Finance& —
REVIEWED BY: City Manager
Chula Vista Sanitary Service, Inc. , has requested an increase in service rates
of 8.9% for residential properties and an average of 10.02% for trailer parks
and commercial/industrial .
The Finance Department has performed an evaluation of the proposed rate increases
based on financial .information furnished by Chula Vista Sanitary Service and
their auditors. Our evaluation indicates that the requested rate increases
are reasonable and justified. The new rates, if approved by the City Council ,
will be effective February 1 , 1985.
•
RECOMMENDATION:
That Council conduct a public hearing to receive testimony regarding the
proposed rate increases and, if appropriate, approve the resolution revising
rates.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not Applicable.
DISCUSSION:
Chula Vista Sanitary Service last received a rate increase over two years ago
on October 1 , 1982. The approved increase at that time was 3.7% for residential
mandatory service and an average of 13% for commercial/industrial . The current
proposed rate increase is 8.9% for residential and an average of 10.02% for
commercial/industrial .
The Finance Department's evaluation included:
1. An examination of the Sanitary Service's audited financial statements
for the fiscal years ending March 31 , 1981, 1982, 1983 and 1984 and
financial projections for 1985..
2. A look at the consumer price index covering the period since the last
rate increase.
3. Calculations of Chula Vista Sanitary Service's return on investment.
4. A comparison of current rates in other cities in this area.
Form A-113 (Rev. 11/79)
•
Page 2, Item 7
Meeting Date 1/22/85
CONCLUSIONS:;
Our evaluation has resulted in the following conclusions:
1. Based on our review of the audited financial statements, the projected
expenses and revenues for 1985 are reasonable when compared with
• previous years' financial data.
2. The consumer price index has increased 9.6% since the last rate increase.
Thus the proposed rate increases appear to be in line with this bench mark.
3. The projected rate of return on investment for 1985 is 6.3%. This seems
• to be consistent with rates of return in previous years of 7.7% in 1981-82,
9.8% in 1982-83 and 3,83% in 1983-84.
4. A comparison of service rates in other cities indicates that the proposed
rates for Chula Vista are very competitive. Please see Exhibit IV of the
attached report for details.
FINANCIAL 7IJ4PACT:
If the new rates are approved,. the City will receive approximately $16,000
in additional franchise fees on an annual basis.
•
/ / ' ->> •
by the City Council of
Chula Vista, Caiifornia
•
Dated = _ �
January 16, 1985
TO: John Goss, City Manager
VIA: Gene Asmus, Assistant City Manager
FROM: Lyman Christopher, Director of Finance4°
SUBJECT: Evaluation of Proposed Rate Increase Requested by Chula Vista
Sanitary Service, Inc.
The Finance Department has completed an evaluation of the proposed rate
increase requested by Chula Vista Sanitary Service. The purpose of our
evaluation was to determine if the proposed rate increase was justified and
consistent with financial indicators and within guidelines established by
previous rate reviews. The evaluation was based on an examination of the
Sanitary Services' audited financial statements for the fiscal years ending
March 31 , 1981 , 1982, 1983, and 1984. The unaudited financial statements for
the six months ended September 30, 1984, and the projections for calendar year
1985 were also reviewed.
It is my recommendation that the City adopt the proposed new rates as shown on
Exhibit V effective February 1 , 1985. Chula Vista Sanitary Service has
requested an average increase in rates of 8.9% for residential properties and
10.02% for trailer parks and commercial/industrial. The new rates will give
the company a projected return on investment for 1985 of 6.3% which is
consistent with rates of return of previous years and results in rates that
are comparable and competitive with current rates in surrounding cities.
The following exhibits have been prepared to provide necessary information in
considering the adoption of the proposed new rates.
Exhibit I - Comparative Summary of Income Statements
This schedule shows the actual return on investment for the fiscal years ended
March 31 , 1981 , 1982. 1983, 1984 and the projected return for the calendar
year ending December 31 , 1985. The 9.83% return in 1983 and 3.83% in 1984
resulted primarily from the following factors:
1. Income increased by 9.8% in 1983 and 7.8% in 1984 as a result of the rate
increase approved by the City Council on October 1 , 1982 (3.7% in
residential mandatory service and an average of 13% in
commercial/industrial) .
I
2. Total expenses increased by 8.9% in 1983 and 9.3% in 1984 due mainly to
the following:
4
a. Landfill fees increased by 14.1% in 1983 and .4% in 1984. The volume
of trash collected and dumped increased due to the changes from
non-mandatory to mandatory service.
John Goss - 2 - January 16, 1985
b. Salaries, payroll taxes, employee benefits, representing 36% of the
total expenditures, increased 10.0% in 1983 and 6.1% in 1984.
c. Miscellaneous expenses increased by 4.3% in 1983 and 13.7% in 1984
due mainly to the following:
1. Franchise fees increased by 122.9% in 1983 and 21 .1% in 1984.
This was due to the increase in franchise fees from 2% to 4-1/2%
effective September 1 , 1982 per Ordinance No. 1993.
2. Bad debts increased by 87.6% in 1983 and 118.8% in 1984. the
change from non-mandatory to mandatory service increased the
number of residences serviced and billed by the company causing
substantial increase in bad debts.
3. Accounting and legal fees increased by 10.9% in 1983 and 702.0%
in 1984 as a result of the anti-trust lawsuit filed by Tom
Hudson against the City of Chula Vista and the Chula Vista
Sanitary Service, Inc.
d. Insurance increased 32.7% in 1983 and 70.2% in 1984. The company was
billed directly by SCA Services, Inc. and was charged the following:
FY 1983 FY 1984
Workers Compensation $62,489 $78,469
Auto & General Liability 34,078 84,586
Performance and Bid Bonds 188 188
TOTAL $96,755 $164,712
According to SCA Services (the former parent company of CVSS), the premium
rates used in insurance allocation are based on the experience rating with the
company, the size of the company, and the increase in insurance rates by the
insurance industry. Accidents caused a poor experience rating of Chula Vista
Sanitary Service raising the workers compensation and the auto insurance
expenditures in FY 1983 and 1984. Also, the insurance industry has increased
the rates considerably in the past couple of years.
Overall , we feel the insurance allocation is fair and equitable. If CVSS has
to purchase insurance independently, the insurance premium will be more than
the amount allocated by the parent company.
1985 Revenue and Expenditure Projections
The 1985 projection is based on calendar year ending December 31 , 1985, in
order to coincide with the accounting period of Genstar, the new parent
A company. On October 1 , 1984, Genstar acquired CVSS from SCA Services.
For 1985, the projections indicate a 9.0% increase in revenue over 1983-84 and
an 8.9% increase in expenses. The result is a 6.3% return on investment.
John Goss - 3 - January 16, 1985
Factors having a significant impact on the 1985 projections are as follows:
1. The revenue projection is based on the old rates for one month and the
proposed new rates for eleven months.
2. Contract hauling revenue has been experiencing a decline the past two
years by design. CVSS has received contracts from other firms in the past
to do hauling in County areas. They are purposefully cutting back on this
service.
3. Salaries and wages indicate a 10.7% increase in 1985 due to the hiring of
two additional persons and a 7% cost of living increase for the union
empl oyees.
4. Benefits show a 23.4% increase because:
a. A car allowance is now provided for two persons whereas one car used
to be leased,
b. paid vacation is now charged to benefits whereas it used to be
charged to salaries, and
c. a new pension plan was started in 1984.
5. The 17.2% increase in depreciation reflects the acquisition of one new
truck in 1985 and three months depreciation allowance for a new $1 million
building being constructed by CVSS in Chula Vista.
Exhibit II - Analysis of Miscellaneous Expense
In 1985, the substantial decrease in legal fees, bad debts and interest help
to offset the large increase in repairs and maintenance of equipment so that
the projected growth in miscellaneous expenses is estimated at 9.3%.
T The large increase in costs of repairing and maintaining the fleet of 20
trucks is attributed to the fact that CVSS has not been able to maintain a
regular schedule of equipment replacement. From 1976 through 1982 CVSS
averaged replacement of almost three trucks per year. No trucks were
purchased in 1983, one in 1984, and one is scheduled for 1985. This aging of
the rolling stock results in substantially higher routine maintenance and
repair costs.
In 1984, CVSS was charged $80,000 in legal fees by SCA Services, Inc. in
connection with the anti-trust lawsuit filed by Tom Hudson. Although the case
was settled in favor of the company, the attorney of the deceased Tom Hudson
has filed an appeal. The legal fees projected in 1985 include $14,000
contingency for the lawsuit.
The interest expense is based on an existing unsecured note. On March 31 ,
1985, the company will pay $75,000 of the $150,000 note. The balance will be
fully paid on March 31 , 1986.
John Goss - 4 - January 16, 1985
Bad debt is based on the experience of the company. In the last six months
ended September 30, 1984, CVSS was able to collect amounts previously, charged
to bad debts resulting in a low projection in 1985.
Exhibit III - Calculation of Return-on-Investment
The proposed new rates, if approved, would result in a projected return on
investment of 6.3% which is consistent with rates of return achieved by CVSS
in previous years.
k Exhibit IV - Comparative Analysis of Residential Service Rates
This exhibit indicates that the proposed residential rate for Chula Vista of
$6.10 is very competitive and comparable with surrounding cities.
Exhibit V - Chula Vista Sanitary Service, Inc. Proposed Rate Schedule
This schedule shows the old rates, proposed new rates, and the percent of
increase.
Alternative Methods of Evaluation
The evaluation of the proposed rate increase is consistent with the method
used for the past several years in Chula Vista. It is my intent, over the
next several months, to survey other jurisdictions for methods they use in
evaluating rate proposals to determine if there is a different method that is
more valid or if there are adjustments that can be made to our current method
of evaluation to make it more meaningful .
LC:fp
WPC 0234G
- 1 -, 1 1 1 1 1
0
C
H 4) . H. C
r- O N N O .D In P n •..1
(4 CO .•e CO U1 0
H '. 10 P 0 In V r` 0 N Cr, m U1 00
H 0 0 4 H N P ri P .-1 Al rl 0 r l r4
C
O 4 W r•I v v••, ..d
H !t U > >1 N
4 H 7
.5,
01
4)
•
W •
je .O OOO 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 O In IA e0
0
Co Q O N 0 O O O O O 0 N CO .0 in 4 4
ic 43 ,d r` .-4 0 0 CO 0 in I 0 N CO N In
IP Q Q `O < l 1 n .O P.
CO 4 d v in en Q r I .--I U en In U 0
P P .O P P .O In rI N OP n n N U
.-I .0N 0 03 N in N HP P .3
p.
.•4.•I In N 0) 0
0 Ib e4
A.
41
wHII 4 C
W Wa >03 N N r 4 CO IP NR Q r` N r- in I. 0
0 4 W In in CO n N Q In 0 cn P 0 i+ .
U 4 >. 1-4 N N In r..-1 01 0 4)
114 C W v v v U _
H 0 •0 0
43
w 0 0
'^ w Q
03 w
••.., Q H N P 00 .O N .0 Q 50 N Q 0 00 IP M Ot 0 W
en Co 1. U1 CO .•e P N CO P P 1.4 U1 .O U1 0 U) In 0
In P.-1 IP In CO CO Q M In r I n is.rI 0 n e. 0 00 01
H 17 ,•d N U1 P 0 0 01 Q N •4)n In 50 0 ,O In '3 0
In.) re in M P CO P P P .D O In .O in In •.I
▪ P U U1 ri re n n .d Sr ri r♦P n .0 CO
Q
P H r11 H N - N 4., P.
c.•
00
• z ..„ P. .1
0 0
H PI W 0 x
+) 7
• en 10.4 U 4 � 1r. 4 CO rI P CO ... W
wH
0 W0. 0) P Ori Cn .Dr'. n CO r4 Sr U
H y a.H1 j4 U 4>4 H ^ .•d P 0 .O Q N P N O CO .4 P.
P C13 co 1-1 a Nen Q V a2N H > ... C A
w0
0 e4 y)
H
a4D 41 •.4
6>e ,1 .1.) 3
44 en
H 03 N Q CO Q Le 0
Cr. U 50 .-I .O .O Q r N U .O 0 Q
CO P er In U .• P N Q != 0 V
N M P. •.0
N y C' 0 CO P P .O r-I <in 0 r ri U M In O 0 0 1-1 4 co I 7 N in Co .O H en re In .O .O CO 0 .O 0 .O P U -el
Hwy N J.) r4P CO P 50 IP P P PP 0 P P C 0
y > ri 03 U en O H In n H V r1 A /11 H U
•H. el .4 d H r4 N N 0
D6.M U
w t P
,F, 03 44 00 4 0 CO N P Q U1 CO A..O Q 1�H 03 P 4• r♦
0 a CA
4 W V/ 01 r CA 0 rI O ri r1 p CO 0 N y
w >I 1-4 r-I i 1•1 r Q0C NO3 vH N .O v 4
• C W v W
H C
.7 0
td
Co E W
H 0 Q
W U V
N N IP .O an M CO r4 IP in .o N 0 01 01 K y 0)
Co in N 0 CO 0 - 50 In .D P In In In in N C V
P.-I H 1-4 P r•I 0 In NO P in CO in P Al if N A• W C
1-1 W • • • • • • • • • • 4
I 7' In in co U1 n v 0 H Co N in 50 CO 0 Co n
r-I 4-I H N .O .O CO Q M Co H.O P .O .D p, 4
CO U ri 0 H 1.1 .O r4 C 1-4 n N 10
..4• 6 r4 r4 N N 4 >.
4) 4
W
O g
H In 0 In .O CO in .O•. re .1 M .O 0 .O Q Ot 44 .•I
CO in a P .O 0 'Q H C N •• Al N .0 CO In 0 ed
P.-1 ,..I .O 03 .O n P I, r- Q.O P. P P P en V Cl
a4 • • • . • . . • . . ■
I 7 r•I en 0 IP
N .• n a e .O O an O Q in + 0
Ji O.0 en 0 h 0 P U H Q 0 02 In N r O
CO 0 0 P H 0 50 ri Al,I •O P H re v
CO Q
O
0 .0
.••1 H N H W
...I
14 0
_ A
00 4l N co
CO 0..
'-4 00)01 43 N a0 W .07 4) E W es_
7 3 4).r1 W C 0 7 ••' w 43 V1 •
•-I e0 X W W 0 .a 0 Q. 0) 0 01
•-1 a0 x .!f 0 W w•.1 W 0) .0 0) X 0! C
0•.I H C 4-1 4 0 C W «i .••. > W 0 0
..4 4) J) W 1A 0)••1 14 0 U ed N 04 01 (4 C -1) a.1 4.4 .��
'4, 0 C U E W ra 134.-e•.I W C'4 0 0 W N H +I �.
4 W W 0 .•4.-I ••i U E e0.-1 0) 4 X 0 W W U
W V 4 U 40 •W W a 4 W a CO 4 0 E E W O
..e a) C N 0 4.-1 O 4•r1 7 U H '' 0 0 O•9 P
00
C H W >, a C a 7 01 U1 w X w U U O N
W 0 4 0 01 a0 e4 E 00 W O' C•14 W W .0 W C 0 C 4 N
O
Gtr
OaO rnaW ..7Q W H1E .� H E ••I X a: H•ria O
0 o W 0 7
H
0 4H t:))
a W a H a a 41 1 3
I ) ) t ) ) _) ) ) ) )
•
M
N V It
CO O es _
E W W T .OT .O r-N in 0 01 U1 01 Al T t M
M 0 0 4 el I •
CD 4 al v r1 N 1.r•1 t N a0 N N in N 0 ir1 I I T
M DC 0 > >4 el .0 r1 N N v N H t n I rl
-1 O W v v sr v
O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O D
1t •) OO DOOOOOOOOO OOO O
h U 0 0 U• • • • • • • U1 Ul N O WI
00 V O Ul T .O O O t`ri .0 Cl N t t 01 T I r1
T T t U) 01 Cl N U1 N N N r1 M N T
ri O rl 09 rl T
4
O.
4
V 0 _ . _
a.� .
14 4 4 O M N CO.O T rl t T N co D H n
W N W O 1 • 1
0 4 0 .-1 in in Uf.O T N T rl in CO N O rl D 01
10! 0 N � v H v H H HO I N I H
H > .
0
in
CO
\ _
ra t U1 1.1 I` t ri ri N O t ri ri N O O O O t
CO O O in U1.O T.-I In in r. in r. O t O 01 in
Ns T.4 rl N O l.O CO N S. in N OD in in t O NO ri
04 r
N H 0 r.4 O ri O CD t.•T in 01 CD D t n T t n
01 4.4 T It 04 01 09 N 01 N 01 T ri rH N.. O •
CO 6
rH N T
r1
t
CO ri .
r1
CO `
2 N en
4
4. N o) V O
Co•r1
w co z _
W V Sr I. 04 r4 t in t CO r-r` in N .O T T
Cal Gy H O al w V I • 1 an
H r-1 Al V 09H Nt NNHH m... c) O NO
> y M !C O V N rf N v N rl r•1 ri 03N I H I t
00 M H > v v v
0 Z •-
U M
~0 in ih t N i1 .0 T in 01 T in r4 .O O O CO O I.1 .O
~ co rl T N N rl In T CO .O Al t .O O O O T rl
CO- T.•4 r. t N Uf n It T N IS. r1 n N in O O .O r1
C 0 ODD 1 3 t co O .O U1 rH.O 01 t N'— rH t is' T U1 V
PI E N 41 4-1 01 ri 01 01 t in N rl r4 ri T N r1 T
CO H1 L N N '— F.
AI CO
ain
M U3
O x 4 H.
co•.O1 N ri P1 N.O r-D rH U) T .O T 01 T F.
L. L. ■ .. . . . ■
y W a)
, 000. 4 m1` 0 Is.IA .00N N T int Tn0' CD
i 44 0 14>4 .•i re v t` r`H .•� N rr4 t rl rl 54 0 C>0
H >
a 0 ,
C
0
CO
N
W
rN
N D r+ I'.O+M in r1 M t .D T o D O O It N
CO t 09 O.D r.rm.rl rl U) t in N D N D CO 07
CA.4 V t tDi7In O CD O CO t r) In in CD VD 09
rl 4
1 0 rH .D T O r-t CD T t O T T t in P N O
r4 L• N t 0 09 In 10 N N rH t N,. 10
OD 0 T C N N Ts.
H
r1 CA 04 rH r■CD t r.rl in It O D O OD D in in
CD P t O rl O N In n 0 in t•) t O N O UI N
P i .O 01 CD t t r4 O I. .D O N t N t t r1 10
r1
I t` r) T N r1 r1 01 T A9 .O t .O O) OD b N t .
O m t OD 07 CV VI N H x101 Al... t
O D H ri .0
T
. r4
to
a0 ID __._
Pe H.C-I-I 0C,F 4) V —�
H � 4)i8 CO.H G ..3 > a a ~
E ? C H 4) V 54 H V V V On DD r•---
0 H—i 0 0 0 a ea 0 V V 4
.0 a 4+1 4) 10.-I a tO W N.b -
Z> D; C W.0 V AO 00 0 is
.••I 00 .-I W 7 O 0 O V V O a CD
.•1 .17 ID CO 4.1 a 0 In 0 +l H .0 a 4-1 N -,
y O V V C C a+e 4? 01 O .1 00 .r. N
H UI 4--I.ri V 4.1 sO b a. 14 0 L F ce W N
V G•rl.a-co 4 i. o 7 4 D a +-1 0
H.-1 of 4.••I rl V V V a Al O N V C IS. • V
V..0 p.at..-i H.0 >.-I V +1 b C) al a a 1. .0 a- 0
V x V 3 0 0 n 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 0 (3 54 0 4, 0 p3..
>. W CO OD01-ICED CI CO d W Xr..o re E
l ) ) ) .) ) > _) > > > > •) J > 3 ) .)
0
EXHIBIT III
CHULA VISTA SANITARY SERVICE, INC.
SCHEDULE OF RETURN ON INVESTMENT
FISCAL YEARS ENDED 3/31/81 ; 3/31/82; 3/31/83; 3/31/84; 12/31/85
ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL 1985
1980-81 1981-82 1982-83 1983-84 PROJECTION
Pre Tax Profit 183,940 68,253 96,324 66,754 77,220
Income Taxes (58,980) 0 0 (30,705) (23,586)
After Tax Profit 124,954 68,253 96,324 36,049 53,634
Total Capital
Beginning of Period 390,344 515,298 583,551 679,875 709,303
Add: After Tax Profit 124,954 68,253 96,324 36,049 53,634
Total Capital End of
Period 515,298 583,551 679,875 715,924 762,937
Long Term Debt 300,000 300,000 300,000 225,000 93,750
Basis for Calculation
of Return on Investment 815,298 883,551 979,875 940,924 856,687
Return on Investment 124,954 68,253 96,324 36,049 53,634
Percent of Return on
Investment 15.30% 7.72% 9.83% 3.83% 6.3%
WPC 0231G
EXHIBIT IV
CHULA VISTA SANITARY SERVICE, INC.
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF RESIDENTIAL SERVICE RATES
CURRENT EFFECTIVE
CITY FREQUENCY OLD RATE EFF. DATE RATE DATE
National City 1 week $5.85 7/1/81 $6.25 10/01/84
El Cajon 1 week 5.95 7/1/81 6.451 4/01/85
La Mesa 1 week 5.70 7/1/81 6.15 1/01/85
Escondido 1 week 4.55 7/1/81 5.202 7/01/82
Imperial Beach 1 week 5.803 1/01/85
Vista 1 week 6.40 1981 No change
San Marcos 1 week 6.60 1981 No change
Lemon Grove 1 week 5.70 7/1/81 6.15 3/01/85
Chula Vista 1 week 5.60 10/1/82 6.104 2/01/85
1 Proposal not yet submitted and approved.
2 Trash bills included in the water bills at no cost to the company. No
franchise fees paid to the City of Escondido.
3 Under contract with Chula Vista Sanitary Service effective January 1 ,
1985. Trash bills included in the water bills at no cost to the company.
4 Proposed rate effective February 1 , 1985.
Average rate (excluding Chula Vista) -- $6.125
WPC 0230G
\\ \\
EXHIBIT V
CHULA VISTA SANITARY SERVICE, INC.
Hand Pickup Rate Schedule
2/1/85
AMOUNT OF % of
TYPE OF SERVICE OLD RATE NEW RATE INCREASE INCREASE
Family Residential Properties 5.60 6.10 .50 8.93
The second and for each additional 4.00 4.40 .40 10.00
residential unit in multiple dwelling
FOR COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL:
Up to (2) 40 Gal. Containers one time weekly 6.20 6.85 .65 10.48
Up to (2) 40 Gal . Containers two times weekly 11 .20 12.35 1 .15 10.27
Up to (2) 40 Gal . Containers three times weekly 16.50 18.15 1 .65 10.00
Additional or unusual accumulation of rubbish 3.30 3.65 .35 10.61
Trailer Parks and Motels (Central Location)
Minimum per month 10.45 11 .50 1.05 10.05
Two times weekly 3.70 4.10 .40 10.81
Three times weekly 4.60 5.10 .50 10.87
Daily Pickup (6 times weekly) 6.45 7.10 .65 10.08
Trailer Parks (Individual Can Service)/per unit
One collection weekly 4.00 4.40 .40 10.00
Two collections weekly 5.35 5.90 .55 10.28
CHULA VISTA SANITARY SERVICE, INC.
Bin Service Rates
Effective 2/1/85
MINIMUM RATE MAXIMUM RATE
'' WEEKLY YARDS INCREASE INCREASE
4INS PICKUP MONTHLY OLD RATE NEW RATE AMOUNT % OLD RATE NEW RATE AMOUNT %
1 1 13 33.00 36.00 3.00 9.09 39.90 42.50 2.60 6.5.
1 2 26 56.40 60.00 3.60 6.38 65.45 71 .35 5.90 9.0
1 3 39 78.40 83.00 4.60 5.87 91 .85 100.10 8.25 8.9:
1 4 52 102.30 109.00 ( 6.70 6.55 119.35 130.10 10.75 9.0
• 1 5 65 125.95 134.00 8.05 6.39 147.40 160.65 13.25 8.9'
1 6 78 154.55 160.00 5.45 3.53 177.95 193.95 16.00 8.9'
1 7 91 178.20 190.00 11 .80 6.62 206.80 225.40 18.60 8.9'
2 1 26 62.15 64.15 2.00 3.22 71 .50 77.95 6.45 9.0.
2 2 52 110.55 116.55 6.00 5.43 121 .30 132.20 10.90 8.9'
- 2 3 78 146.35 154.35 8.00 5.47 164.70 179.50 14.80 8.9'
2 4 104 184.20 200.00 15.80 8.58 211 .90 230.95 19.05 8.9'
2 5 130 222.05 250.00 27.95 12.59 256.80 279.90 23.10 9.01
2 6 156 273.45 305.00 31.55 11.54 313.30 341 .50 28.20 9.01
2 .7 182 319.80 360.00 40.20 12.57 366.10 399.00 32.90 8.9'
3 1 39 89.40 92.40 3.00 3.36 104.35 113.75 9.40 9.0
3 2 78 151 .50 159.50 8.00 5.28 171 .65 187.10 15.45 9.01
3 3 117 206.15 218.00 11 .85 5.75 256.45 279.50 23.05 8.9'
3 4 156 260.75 290.00 29.25 11 .22 299.00 325.90 26.90 9.01
3 5 195 318.00 362.00 44.00 13.84 366.85 399.85 33.00 9.01
3 6 233 391 .30 450.00 58.70 15.00 427.80 466.30 38.50 9.01
3 7 274 447.05 546.00 98.95 22.13 519.25 566.00 46.75 9.01
4 1 52 116.15 121 .00 4.85 4.18 136.00 148.25 12.25 9.0
4 2 104 191 .20 201 .00 9.80 5.13 216.50 236.00 19.50 9.0
4 3 156 263.95 286.00 22.05 8.35 302.15 329.35 27.20 9.01
4 4 208 335.25 391 .00 55.75 16.63 381.25 415.55 34.30 9.01
4 5 260 410.00 499.00 89.00 21 .71 466.90 508.90 42.00 9.01
4 6 312 509.15 607.00 97.85 19.22 590.25 643.40 53.15 9.01
4 7 364 571 .25 715.00 143.75 25.16 654.95 750.75 58.95 9.01
5 1 65 141 .45 148.00 6.55 4.63 166.20 181 .15 14.95 9.01
5 2 130 236.05 257.00 20.95 8.88 265.65 289.55 23.90 9.01
5 3 195 322.85 369.00 46.15 14.29 343.85 374.80 30.95 9.01
5 4 260 410.00 486.00 76.00 18.54 464.60 506.40 41 .80 9.01
5 5 325 509.15 599.00 89.85 17.65 615.00 670.35 55.35 9.01
5 6 409 639.70 715.00 75.30 11 .77 743.48 810.40 66.92 9.01
5 7 455 701 .80 860.00 158.20 22.54 807.90 880.60 72.70 9.01
6 1 78 169.05 175.00 5.95 3.52 196.65 214.35 17.70 9.01
6 2 156 273.15 307.00 33.85 12.39 312.25 340.35 28.10 9.01
6 3 234 375.20 436.00 60.80 16.20 427.80 466.30 38.50 9.01
6 4 312 478.10 562.00 83.90 17.55 558.90 609.20 50.30 9.01
6 5 398 621 .00 690.00 69.00 11 .11 712.45 776.55 64.10 9.01
6 6 468 769.95 827.00 57.05 7.41 883.20 962.70 79.50 9.01
6 7 546 844.70 976.00 131 .30 15.54 1024.65 1116.85 92.20 9.01
Average increase for minimum price = 11.02% Average increase for maximum price = 8.94%