HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Statement 1989/04/25 Item 13 COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item -i5 f3
Meeting Date.41tBIg #A15)87
ITEM TITLE: Ordinance 2310 - Amending Section 2.56.220 of the Chula Vista
Municipal Code relating to Disposal of Surplus Supplies,
Materials and Equipment
SUBMITTED BY: Assistant City Attorne? SL:,O D „E%''DING AND ADOPTION
(4/5ths Vote: Yes No X )
Council Referral No. 1429
In response to a request from the Mayor of Tijuana and the Director of the San
Diego County Department of Transborder Affairs relating to the purchase of
surplus police vehicles, the Council directed staff to return with a proposed
amendment to the City's purchasing ordinance to provide broad flexibility to
participate in the County's now statewide program. The attached proposed
ordinance will delete the requirement that surplus property may only be
transferred to approved civic or social organizations "within the city", and
will increase the value of matters eligible for free transfer to approved
civic or social organizations from $500 to $5,000.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: N/A
RECOMMENDATION: That Council place the ordinance on first reading if it
meets with Council's approval.
DISCUSSION:
The existing ordinance authorizes transfer of surplus supplies, materials and
equipment by the City Purchasing Agent, upon the recommendation of the City
Manager and with the approval of the City Council, if the materials are worth
less than $500 and are to be provided to civic or social organizations "within
the city". Those internally imposed conditions prevent the City'
participation in the County Department of Transborder Affairs program to make
surplus police vehicles available to public agencies outside the State of
California/United States. The proposed amendments would eliminate the "within
the city" restriction, and increase the potential value of the surplus from
$500 to $5,000 to deal more realistically with the value of the surplus
vehicles.
FISCAL IMPACT: Unknown. Some possible loss of revenue with regard to
surplus vehicles which otherwise would be sold at auction.
5551a •
"seta d Rani?
arc act°
by the City of by the City ounces of
Counc
Chula Vista, California Chula Vista, California
Dated
4-a-09 Dated 4" *o25 �?
Page 3, Item 18
Meeting Date 5/23/89
General plan.
The Harborside area is designated under four land use designations on the
Montgomery Specific Plan as follows:
North of Moss.
. The area to be amended from the M52/M54 to the I-L-P zone is
designated Research and Limited Industrial .
• The area to be amended from RU29 to R3 is designated High Density
Residential (18 to 27 dwelling units per acre).
. The area to be amended from C36 to C-T-P is designated Mercantile and
Office Commercial .
South of Moss (west of Colorado) there are two land use designations.
. The predominant land use designation as Research and Limi ted
Industrial is proposed to be changed from M54 to I-L-P.
• At the northwest corner of Colorado and Naples , there is a 1-acre
parcel of land zoned M54 which is proposed to be amended to R-3-P-9
to be consistent with the Montgomery Specific Plan land use
designation of low/medium density residential (3 to 6 dwelling units
per acre).
South of Moss (east of Colorado).
▪ The areas proposed for a zone change from R-S-7 to R-1-7 is
designated 1 ow/medium density residential (3 to 6 dwell ing units per
acre).
. The area proposed to be amended from C34 to R3 is designated high
density residential (18 to 27 dwelling units per acre ).
• The area proposed for change from C36 to C-T-P is designated
Mercantile and Office Commercial .
There are several factors which support the rezonings described above.
1 . The Montgomery Specific Plan was adopted by the Chula Vista City
Council on January 12, 1988. These zone reclassifications are
primarily proposed to implement that Specific Plan. The Plan also
goes on to identify the vulnerability of the residential enclave in
Harborside and the need to protect it from intrusion of incompatible
uses. These rezonings and the use of the precise plan modifying
district on the commercial/industrial parcels will assist in
protecting those existing residences.
a
Page 4, Item 18
Meeting Date 5/23/89
2. In the case of the proposed zone change from M52 and the M54 to
I-L-P, the proposed zone would prohibit any new outdoor storage and
sales yards which are not completely enclosed by solid walls, fences,
buildings not less than 6 ft. in height.
3. In the case of the proposed zone change from M54 to R-3-P-9, the
purpose of that change is to assign a zone to that property which is
more compatible to the adjacent residential and Harborside Elementary
School . It would also prevent expansion of the existing fertilizer
use as well as permit a residential density which is in keeping with
the density anticipated by the Montgomery Specific Plan.
4. In all cases except for the parcel at the northwest corner of
Colorado and Naples, the proposed zoning is our best attempt to
convert adopted-City County zoning to the City zoning without
adversely impacting the development capability of the properties.
5. This item was unanimously recommended by the Montgomery Planning
Committee and the City Planning Commission.
FISCAL IMPACT : Not applicable.
WPC 6230P
•
_4 2_ '/.t
by the City Co Of it of
Chula Vista, California
Dated "Aitcond.
Gf07/q OC.
by the City Council of
Chula Vista, California
Dated -6-29