HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Statement 1989/03/14 Item 15 COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
•
Item �� /S
Meeting Date =MP 3/14/89
ITEM TITLE: Ordinance - Declaring the Policy of the City Council to
Attempt to Fill the Position of Personnel Director "In House"
Prior to Going "Outside" to Seek Applicants
SUBMITTED BY: City Attorney'j/J, SECOND READING AND ADOPTION
(4/5tns Vote: Yes No X )
Council Referral No. 1447
This ordinance declares the policy of the City Council to fill the position of
Personnel Director "in house" prior to seeking "outside" candidates.
RECOMIENDATION: Place the Ordinance on its First Reading
BOARDS/COMIISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: N/A
DISCUSSION:
At the February 28, 1989 meeting of the City Council, the Council directed the
C' Attorney's office to bring back an ordinance pursuant to Charter Section
which would establish a City Council policy to fill the position of
mel Director "in house" prior to seeking "outside" candidates for the
office.
Charter Section 305 states as follows:
The Mayor and the councilmen are hereby individually and
collectively prohibited from performing any administrative
or executive functions except as same may be authorized by
this Charter or by ordinance of the City of Chula Vista.
Pursuant to the proposed ordinance, the City Manager would first attempt to
fill the Personnel Director position "in house" prior to advertising and/or
interviewing "outside" candidates.
5371a
3/7/89- First Reading 2` QNluntdjd,
3/14/89- Second Reading and Adoption J7�`j�,
by '/the CitCouncil of
Chula Vista, C:.lifornia
• Dated 317- 2t
• •
Agenda Item No. sr 5
Meeting Date: 1/17/09 fezµ + Ff
• Page Two
On a related subject, representatives of the Bayscene Residents Negotiating
Committee expressed objection to some of the statements in an earlier report
to Council . They objected to what they felt were the following inferences:
Cl ) that their petition to submit the 1988 rent increase was late; (21 that
utility costs would go down as a result of individual metering; and (3) that
the delays in the previous negotiations were attributable to the residents.
Staff regrets any statements or inferences in the report which might be taken
as facts pertinent to the dispute. Staff has only made a preliminary review
of the documents on hand and has not reached any conclusions as to how the
merits of this dispute should be resolved.
The staff report also noted that the mobilehome park owner has been
"forthcoming" in this matter. The Residents negotiating Committee has been
forthcoming as well as the report indicated in the "Analysis" Section, where
it is stated,"the process has been pursued in good faith by both parties".
FISCAL IMPACT: N/A
S1 60a
•
//i t it — -12.44J" (✓J C".rnc+.. �
•
•