HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 1953-1432 RESOLUTION NO. 1432
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF CHULA VISTA REJECTING CLAIM OF
GEORGE MUNOZ ,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE
AS FOLLOWS:
That the verified claim for damages filed with the City
of Chula Vista by 'GEORGE MUNOZ on the 27th day of April, 1953,
a copy of which is attached hereto, and by this reference in-
corporated herein, is hereby denied and rejected.
t
j
•
•
•
ADOPTED AND APPROVED br the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF
CHULA VISTA, CALtFoRNIA4 this 12 h day of_May , ,19,51 _
by the following vote, to-wit:
A33S: COUNCILMEN Riesland,' DeWolfe, Halferty
NAYS: COUNCILM • None
ABSENT: COUNOILMEN Logan Hobel„
Pro Tem . ;•r 'o 'e z. y of C s a
/ /
.`
ATTEST: . �i4J.-1.iAr e P r/
y er.
by
Deputy '
E ,
STATE Off' CALI ORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) ss.
CITY OF CHULA VISTA )
I, , City Clerk of the
City of Chula Vista, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above
and foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of Resolution
No. , and that the same has not been amended or
repealed.
DATED:
City Clerk
Deputy
1 YOUr affiant, GEORGE %13NOZ, respectfully requests
-ho City f Cula ista, Police Department, therefere, to pay the
2
arna :es caused to je. r c :fiant in the nature of both special damages
.nd general damap.o , together with the special dagic'e,es set forth above.
3
4 ;01: C• 00"Z
5
%.TATE CF CALiii'OhaA )
6 ) ss
aunty of San Diego )
7
U-UOliGE MUNOZ, being first duly sworn, deposes and says :
8 That no is tmo claimant in the above entitled claim for
liamages * that he has read the foreEoinv claim for damages and knows
9Ithe contents thereof; '6aat the same Is true of own knowledge,
except as to the matters which are stated therein on his information
10 or belief and as to those matters that he "Ielieves it to be true.
11 W.INOZ
12
'subscribed and sworn to before me
13
14 this,gAay of April, 1.953.
15 • ,ohm C. Thompson
otary Pub. lc jdr
16 sa:id County and State.
17
18
19 leceived Copy this 27th day of April, 195 .
201 1
, '
Adt „ • / .
21 iby (2. e'rk ol±ce Department
ALBERT C. BOYER
22 -
I ity Attorney
23
24 .0 ity Audi tar
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
1 John C. Thompson
377 rreckele 37_iildinr
2 San Diego, Cal.{ f orn.'.a
3 Telephone Dei n 5351
4 Attorney for Defendant
5
6 •
7 8 , STATE CF CALIFORNIA
)
ss VF FTPD CLAIM FOR DAMAGES
9 County of ,7an_ Diego )
10 TO: C San(1) The City of Chula vista, .,o� ;.ntyT of .gars go,
State of California.
11 (2) The City Clerk, City of Tiula Vista.
(3) ':ae Police Department , City of Chula Vista.
12
(4) The Auditor of the City of Chula Vista.
(5) Pie City Attorney .of Chula Vista.
13
T)3�f J a
14 S .
n, 1
15 Pursuant to Sections 1980, 1901, and 1982 of uhe (Tovernment
Code, it is claimed thatt the affiant, GEORGE rU'CiZ, has been injured
16 and damaCed as a result of the willful, and wron;'f ul arrest of the
Police Officers of the City of Chula Vista, County of San Diego,
17 State of. California, durir7 the course of service or employment. Tha
said wrongful arrest of said GEORGE ,.'iCi:((OZ occurred on the Fifteenth
18 Day of February, 1953, and that said claim is 'herewith being filed
within ninety days after tie wrongful arrest did occur, and that the
19 present writing is a Verified cla.ira of GRORGE 71U..FOZ for day. ares, and
is presented in writing and filed with the above mentioned persons,
20 who are the officers, t:-ee employee , or the clerk of the City of Chula
Vista, State of California.
21
II
22
EL ,i'll TS OF CLAIM:
23
1. Name of Claimant .:eor e .Munoz,
24 Eiehtlastly years.
25 2. Address of Claimant 273 r11. Lto_ Circle:,' Chula Vista, Call -
Corn a,
26 3. Date of .lIrre s t :: February 15, 1953.
27 4 . Extent of Injuries. That said GBORGE
`UN ;?, was wrongfully arrested without warrant, by the Police Officers
28 in the early morning hours, on the 15thday of February, 1953, and
held until February 16, 1953. That Sa}o. defendant lost two days work
29
That the specified damaz eo of said ECRG'.' • `T- 'C:, are as follows :
30
1. Attorney fees in the ai:lGunt of �'i0.O0.
31 I 2. Two days lost labor in the amo ent of
3. Your affiant p.as suffered emearra.sment, ridicule,
32 and shame in the amount of , 12,500.00.
33
-1-
I -