HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Statement 1990/08/07 Item 9 Y'
y
r.
are wu
4
Y ,� s I
•�` __ 'U
• �yy ^r
n .. RtI.M wte
1
A;> MN TITLE: Public Netar/M ce
: To sslder the Nettle. of 16 4170
" establishing a develop.at impact tee for Telegreph Cage.
drainage facilities
°retine car 33 tstabllsblq a development Impact fee
{#f ti��aSr as r►aaii
i�a1711fa 1�ae,r b pay for drei�igc factltti s 1. tub Telegreph Caye.
k drainage bast. 1
•. ilgti .r2'i a SDartTTO Ifs Director N Mlic�Mrtj 14ytE/
jj..a. est1 ea non e. RETIERED Olt City NuMger y (Oaths Tote:T.s I Ib 1
l.Ee to e�ron On Jeerer! 1t. Milk, the City Council improved *greenest* with special
' consulting Is to combo a feasibility studm to flame the Telegraph Capra.
Drainage Facilities. Rt pima use meeting. Council also approved •
��}e t / relubwsaeet 1gree.ut with Eastlake Sevelopsa.t to efface all,
„���� %Ming for the study including staff cost. is a result of the stag. staf
1s receomaedlM Council a tub establtshcut of the proposed tee district
under hovereuat Code Settles if000 for Telgraph Cages dratsage ieieore.sot.
f..•t�(.t1F2¢.r.arn.. • SROIESOATiat taactl plate the paepe*N erHefa.e as its first reeding.
l.wi 6 e 1 to nn,
WIDS/C(II Ica$S�IEIOSTIfbs Not applicable.
iff ilH"if!!l�.a DiSCISUSN:
w 1i em, �`
Mee Eastlake 11 was appnredr Eastlake 'Inglewood .es required a lgnve
15 t Telegraph Cayos bad from their business cuter to west of Poses Laden.
t Ii .1m u...0 a except for the section from Apache hive to Rutgers Aveeee. The latter
.1 e 1 e.enn settles was to be tmproeed by the City under the capital l.prewneat program.
Eastlake also agreed to advance any short fall I. feeding for that section of
ij ttii't� Telegraph Campos Road from Apache hive to Rutgers Avenue and receive cash
'.•'Rote Ir.raun. credit or reimburaeseet whist the Transportation Develoeat Impact Few—
. otherwise payable at the time of bailding permit.
,rue . The lmpnve.sot of Telegraph Cages Road to six lane major In act-orderco with
3�.,14i:li(:�;;n•..,• " the circulation element of the Cameral Plan necessitated the relocation of the
• existing adjaceat chaesel to allow for the road widaetsg. Eastlake
—
!.a'" Dewelop.et was also required to relocate and expend the existing Ousel to
f'!j >r its ultluete impraw.at.
t 1114 1 •+,I I Eastlake envelopment requested the City hire a committee tees to study
i i ' e e i` ;j Eastlake also agriM aid mechanisms deposited all Teeec ry feeding Drainage facilities.tcamsultiag
f}Pte. , toes ttrb aM CitF ttatt cost.
the
4111. !tame A *- ; ` AO primmest 'returnee will establish a drainage Impact fee district for
e - '° �Telagro h Cage. Wt. eider the State Rovennaat Code Section ff000, also
2�1 rj1}} :/r M Trace as AD IMI. %
♦. _ miry•- i n` ,Z ♦` t W - I' _ 1 ..� Fr+- • r•
3 N a.. r._ .— ...._ _._...w._,....m_.
w 1
•
.w
■
.
.. di, Ift.Melbek.
.'.leap. •► __ _ ,
_ •�` .._ ;'°.per'. -.. St.'
•
• 4r
1 a• ` 1
O .
4 - -
't.
,
Page t.stem ° ••
` Mistime late 7 �
^ ky
V' Fru*oaN dlsMct � encompasses all et tM lend area sdMcm s
>_ f, dre/•a•a Nstrttt prelate Memel oast of
°" 2 The water runoff te Tele•raM u' ' 11h C of tM report
1•tarsute 1106 as shoo•M Pap R ofl atHstri �tasM .
no�a Mstm
I i partial N lea/ n 1Kwy s Itf/�oW:tots Thee*is a
h*a•dary t•!d r1th/• the boundaries.
1 properties are tonotnctiM 1mMN 'te: a°•a
,. a tst>tjra11M•a"a.. Iw�ewr. ttM purposes 1w W benefit of sad•
of tM and�e�e 1N will toMd forties an
wlgi•tM Ms1a•only' TKj�Nl o�cistlmS amly
1 ▪ om�ts �a�tefKt'1` awry IidMad ;bares FrNo /the r served
a•a9< ve•ent ptstrlct.
1 Mills are (*stained within contat .usttul
E1•htr (•O1 ondaue epe s A of the report •roof
' parce▪ lsdeN district. „eeol •r�r• teal Krea!*• ad 1tM
parse owner niM•e�alla tr"mousers' accoumt feu 100 preeat - •
benefited acres.
parcels.
proposed 1m0►*reer•n nlulst of q•renlmately 1••150 ltm r
r is east d I terstete tnt1t1s1011 *tiles a*d r�f1
t t Ms le Tno ehrrr
twff�i spiertM Ct1oft`r aTite permissible criteria of
ills da1•n*d usiM tM Citr of (2141 Vista's Fit reduce velocities. rip rep
• sKOad (fill. to the cha•nol. For
a smaleem ei•iN � desit at ley wear lion•
wC*strrc a a•f ft*amclM MepoNS• OA chime eesstt of latenute •OS is
t divided tau three sou as folloust
Charnel Letitia th Road to westerly Eastlake Someday — -
a' 2 11,430'200 es Read t0 t•ers RRooaad(Maryltlty1 ,
5.200' 1.405 westerly
21.750' west •f
rM1 I,geerewants are Necessary eatrwi Sr i 10' •The f ►Nd1t/**d mss. proposed iairo ° Inotely 3..20o feet.
e�t�••uuu •Ob.rete chard fouls distance naturalf'tardiest creek bee al]acr:as:
Ur-cooc
4. aRlsttM m 1 a •
at"*ld N 1*soffllant to Keo modate t •�A v
devel�ed davelo•mat. }
coarwl ilea*from Ws
•'
1 .tiMe ,
ti -ti
V
. - —ter �,,.. ` .�, �- �r-;,71 .
•
_-•,_•__ , ++rrii ' __ -•r--- .. gyp(”" ,?,
• ,;tta 4 .—
;. '- d • •
I f - -
•
. . Y
's 4
{
mama.: 1! • e
The coat of%neveaats orb based um both actual bid prices and eastr'eties
m_,-.. 1 w i:. estlates. Chanel signets 1 amid 2 are based um bid documents ad contracts /
awarded by Eastlake Dawtopsa Ca�a�r Chanel segnat 3 is based epos a -
s estimate provided by 2111 Cnjt tie.ri. ter the City of gala lists fgtaaartq .. - ,
mat . Department.
T, The contraction and right-of-way costs charged to the district consist of the -
coot to Increase capacity from a SO-year storm, assuming no nee develspmet.
'' to a 100-year stone. assuming full devslepsst, b the sorties from Passe
?, laden extending approximately 1{.110 feet east. for the approximately 0.200
feet of chaaani west of Interstate 00S, no fetal eat of W chows' is
included.
/
The constructium cost satiates In channel sets 1. 2 an 3 have bees
} reduced by the cost of chant %emanate related to the improvement of the
b ` adjacent roadway. Table byar shows the net to the proposed district verses
the cost to the adjacet Telegraph gyps Road.
Chanel Cat Oast
tat 7.1.ae Ile[lc to
. Phase 1 3 0$3,101 $ 230.735 S 625,16$
Phase 2 2.602.650 771.0•0 1,622.000
Phase 3 1.137,011 203.280 033.793
Doumstream 8,160.000 6,180,000 0
Coatlageacla 201 0 1,074.770 0
Incidentals a y a
TOTAL 50,755,606 17,785,100 13.301,781
The net b the reed will be folded has the Traapertatia Develepmaat Impact •
j '; fees. y
,,
). fr'Oeeied fn: .
,_" The fees. ed agaiast.all hamaflted undeveloped property within the
planned local drainage area to pay the costs of the drainage taoreveaets. are ,- .
to be apportioned is a per gross beaefited acre basis. The total gross
baaf't acres equals 1,175. ..
The fellerleg formals was used to detente.the cost per gross benefit acre. .
Total Cat 1
RN - 27 1433101 13.121.57 say$3.122/acre
`• laaafit Acres
r
�•
4 J •
rm•.
•
4
. _ - ... \ i ..
-----— - .,.r•
,.y...-r' 6 '�. _ �~ - _.. _.i' -�� --�
.per • • • . . _ ` •.
•
•
•
• .
. . ir-:1
•
I � ,e , r
.
og( '}
• t
`fL •
• Page q.Itms13?eat
.. zk Nt ha r
_
, I Wti 4xrr, v ,, r ; 1
- A`et'1lrttepertc - the frees benefit scrooge for each-parcel • .A�
.j .,,- Wilde the.drsiaap district the tows MportiaN them.. there only a • s
„ pros eta parcel beuaftted•tron the proposed impro emeats. it use necessary
m.`- } t,./..ta:Udus,the wle,parce is the district bet salt the scrooge to the
' f i ..r drains Wts was ,
Mwrrat Cede Sectias alas has•as Al l400. requires a City to pa ..
-j through a process.ta-establiss•reesosable relationship.or samss,betimes a ,ce
t,' dwvelopoeat•praleet;.La Nriteaapronaest for till the development to Is a"
charged•sad the esttllasaattNed cost-et the phltc taprowaeat: It also requires - .
I-,' the peitc aoacy to segregate and accost for the matey received from fees .
. separate.fres Coverall toad monies. These items have bees aUnssad b the :
report or will be set ep,siftarestabttshent of the district.
I `i Is the Inset a parcel tt tided. the ate parcels wilt be assessed a fair r.
share is that the total'assassinate of all the parcels reselttap from the
'i . odylne1 parcel esqqusaal tip, Ml assessment of that parcel. A palic lead 4,
(right-of-eq.parts.epee etc.)will have M nesosaent on them. ;,1:
Cantrectlen toe '* . .
i .,
d t As a caeditta of appres 1. Aswelopwt is igrevinp Section I and U 4
of the proposed chased 1 east-et-interstate 006 and will receive a credit
against the fa lapsed Ice aaaaat eofsl to the actual 1+rawat cost of i�
r ". the facilities.
▪ ' If the actual'esnetwCtion aceeds the amount of the the Mid emuld
1" otherwise be luposed. the IMNvider may request to be reimbursed ter the '
▪ difference trio fees collected by the City. The relsbersaeat shall be usde
•( pursuant to a rNchursemsnt,gnament entered into betimes the City sad
'.subdivider.
All Peers have nest copies of the reports sad invited to tams
° nos held to discus the-proposed drained fee district.
t c FISCAL DPACTs The rill operate all necessary feeding associated -._ ,' -
''j with tha.proposed dretaays improvement for Telegraph Gayos Channel.
20/msd .
�:,. ' p
r • x
•
1g �f* lF is
1 •t r .4 ,y, a• •
•
•F .� .. .
t
. . _......,._. ---
. _ •-
_. .
. .
. .
. • ,
' •
• ,
•
1 .i 1 •
.._
. ,
-..,
. . . . . .
• '
..A. ?.•, , _ ,.. - Sit% .. ,
•-6.4
, • [';,..i.„ .,.14,-..,.,- '.. !!;,........'4'' At40442 ,
. .
„
. . ,. .
'4
. ,
...... t ,,,,,- ‘ Alf ORDINANCt OP TM CITY COUNCIL OT TEE CITT OW cputa -
,:• VISTA. CALIFORch. ADOPTING TELEGRAM CANTON DRAINAGE
. . . PLAN AND ESTANLIMING TSB TELEGRAMS CAN=DRAINAGE 112
qi.".''''''' - :...•;1,...;''' , ,1 .11,
The City Coemett,:of the City of Chula Vista. California dose - '
•
ordain as followss.it ,, . • . -
, '1,,,,,o;z••:,
. 1 . 1 • • , ,. 1.. ••'
Sestina 1:, Plaines•and DetemisatIone. The City Council of the
- City of Chula Vista .California. hereby makes the following legislative
. , ..- •-',
fladiags end determlimUmass . . . ..... - -.
a. DevelOpment is the Telegraph Cony** Drainage Deal*
regilme the construction of drainage facilities which Sr.
i;' additional to drainage facilities serving the area at the time of
7 - adoption of this ordinasce. .
b. A repo ,..titled 'City of Chula Vista California.
Telegraph Canyba. Plan.* dated June 46,, 1SSOr and on file
with the City Clerk, establishes the boundaries of the Telegraph
4
Canyon Drainage-Dania. the boundaries of the Telegraph Girdle
Draimage Improvemeat District and the boundaries of the area of
benefit of the Tel Drainage Improvements. the extent
- - of the additiosal=gCseara:Ilitiee seeded to . date mew
Ill
development in the Drainage District and • propoeed allocatios of
fees to pay for the drainage fecilitles. The Telegraph Canyon
•
'. .4 • Drainage Plea is hereby approved as the plan for constructing' of
planned local,drainage faciiiti.s for the Telegraph Canyon
Drainage District.-
c. The Teltrepli Mayo. Drainage Plea is consistent with the
City'. amoral A aa and will ensure that increased surface and
00000 water runoff resulting from or attributable to mew
, [4..•- development within the drainage best* will be removed in • manner
. which furthers the public health, safety and welfare. In addition .
L . to participation in the construction of the planned drainage
, .
facilities as set forth in the Drainage Plan developers-of
• property within the Drainage Di will be required to
. ..„
construct other ca and off site drainage focilities as a condition
. 7., of development purseant to existing laws and policies of the City.
. - - d. The development of property within the Telegraph Canyon
_. A'• Drainage Basin will require the construction of those drainage
facilities described la the Telegraph Canyon Drainage Plan and
.. other On and elf Oita drainage facilities. Properties within the .
Drainage District show, is the Drainage Plan benefit by
construction of the.drainage fecilities set forth in the Plam to
• . , the extent- that...payment of the fee and construction of the
drainage tacilltifirs will allow the properties to be developed . .
- • ,14,-,4540!:. ' , • according to the al plan. . .,•
x .
; , ,,•t
• , •
4; ....
• !! .,.
N '-.. . • • ..•
•
-
.1.-;-:',.: ''' ':.,,e'•' ::-. .- .
.. 1...,:-...-i' ...%., : p.::::
. ,
.1 .*. ...--....:.4.:
..... , _ '
... .
• .
. • .
_ .
. .
•J't'`...'
... ..
. .
'.----, .
...h .
. .
h .4.• ,,it. . -
**.. 7„4,..
------....."116.''''' . . „
•._ * -
„ ....k.t•-•• --
- ;',..06'P. ..4.
.
or I' -a" ..- -• . _
.
....-• e
...
.._.._ -_-._—.--...-
.-- '''''• -.."'' • - .
. ..
...
•
.1‘. - •
•
. . . •
. ,
.,,
-.. ' . .
. -
r-.,
- -
. •
, . • -
. - .. . . .
• ' ' .
a •
. . • .
•
, •
•
1:
,.....
• •
. ?
,' . , ••:. .
' • I , _ . . - .
' .• • - ,
• .
• .
. .
r - '.-,„-i'.,'-,.. ---',"4tir,'; • .,.- IV .. - .
, . •,y4. . .,;.: • - •!? tat.- : t -,4
'?" .:.: t..'',- ,2:&.".•-'7.."-t' •P. 00, t t- ,
--I.
t ......,:e..... .4 t5i".....i: 46 For the nominee set forth in the Telegraph Canyon
Drainage Plan end is the reports gelled upon and referenced in 410 --
, i' ........., • that Plan and based epos the City's General Plas and the matters
- c. , seated to the City Council at the public hearing at which this
--., A , Ordinance was coescseared and the laws and policies of the city
.:' ' .
relating to devel t of property, the City Council makes the
*,, I •: 4.., * following additirom legislative findings and dote:Mastless*
, •Ii.•*-* 1-.-. '.4`i .
. .
....! "ta•- 1.- The !lagged Drainage Facilities an described In the
, . .,- Telegraph Canyon Drainage Plan are required la order to • - - .
accommodate the surface and storm water run off reviling . • „e„__.... ._... .. . ..
from development of property within the Telegraph Canyon . -'----.1k . -.., . .-Ielir7,7-.- •
Drainage District. The estimated cost of the proposed
- . .
• facilities are based upon standard engineering practices and
. are reasonably determined. The Planned Drainage Facilities
• described in the Plan are necessary to allow development of
• i i: - properties within the District and to mitigate the impact
..,*: resulting from the development of those properties.
. ..z.,. ' Therefore. each property should contribute to the cost of the
facilities based upon a flat amount per gross acre as set
forth it thp Drainage Plan. The flat, per acre fee
*•-• established by this Ordinance Is reasonably and fairly
''•.4 .
apportioned based upon the benefit conferred upon each
. A..... property or upon the need for the facilities created by•time
development of property within the Drainage inprovensat '
. ,
r. '. Immetit.*re .
2. There is • reasonable relationship betimes the use 411
. •..... of the fee for the construction of the Planned Drainage
Facilities and the development of the property within the
Drainage baste be development increases runoff and
• '• retards the natural ability of the undeveloped land to absorb
store and surface waters.
. .
2. There is • ble relationship between the
construction of the Planned Drainage Facility and the various
• land uses for the property set forth on the City's General
',.'. Plan because the rano!f and surface water diversion resulting .
,.
*.4 . from development of the property as shown on the City's
General Plan will on the average be the same for the various
. land uses permitted within the Plan area.
,.,
4. The mmount of the fees to be collected pursuant to
.,:
*.
this Ordinance does not exceed the estimeted cost of .
providing the facilities. If. at any tine, it appears that
, .
,,-. 4 . . the amount of the fees will exceed the estimated cost of the
proposed facilities, including all &dein! and
* i incidental coats, then the fee shall be adjusted accordingly. .
, Section 2. Determination of Costs. The City Council finds that
." . ' -'. . the total cost of providing the planned drainage facility as estimated
•• , -., in 1220 is 47.743.100.00. If the costs are apportioned uniformly on a
.•'.. - per basis to the benefited properties as shown In the Telegraph
Canton * •,'
• ' - '. , Drainage Pins, the pro rats charge for each gross acre meld be 4110.... •
22.00.
• • •,-?ti.e.•', ',?' .■.. '- . * - . -..!-1 -••
....,fil
.. •
-
' ' ....i.. '..?'.''',','-' o'... •
. ' 'o'. i.- • - , -'. ■ , . , aq-4. CiAD
- .■• . '
., . •
. .
,-.
. .
. o
— .
•
,.. • .- - -
. -
...
. .. _ ' ...
''.1.• • , :. -,.
. -. • . • . dz• ,,,,,'''. .
1 ' .
S.
..., ••••• -k.-7-3: kV
_..........------lphi._A..-' - -4.... • ,-.,
— • • • -
._ * _
...... -. ; * ...:. ."..;.
. , ....
u. . . —
... .,....... ,..t,.. . t.„to., t,-a.•- -
.. . ....„ . -
cr.". sr
-- • "56'' - .....,_
-....,- ,
. .- .
T...
, -4'0 ... :: 'v'alial. 4 • • '
• ' . . .
... . •
i . ' - . .. ..
.. - -
-_ ..
•
. .
. .. .
. .
s I
... s
. . .
. .
. .
. •••`•14V"''%. ' .. • •
. , .
. . . ogo.., : , ... ....,. . .
. .
' `..*,• ,, .,
• . .
:'•
,Y Illi.
&reties 3. Orates", Pees Setablished. A drainage is the . • / __ t
Z. amount of $3,522.00 per gross benefit acre of undeveloped land is
.. 4.;
hereby established for each development project within the lidegreplb ..
Canyon Drainage benefit area. The fee is a requirement olbeech
--- ..
-••• - development project, ;tentative mop, tentative percel mop, or building
. permit within the benefit area and shall be paid before the approval by
1-, the City of the development project. For any developesat for which a /
/ fee was mot paid at the time of approval of the final map or parcel • . , , ,
map, the fee shall be paid before the issuance of the first building
‘4- / / "" permit for the development. 'Reynosa at the time established by this -•• •-'="•-•.,cs"- - — ,'•-• —--f-r.•
• ' ----31. -. '4F-- - • -
Section is Necessary to assure that the drainage facilities identified • /........-a-.*
,
is this Plan maybe constructed concurrent with need. • _ . ....„ .._ ,.
, .
: .
For the purpose of dote:Elaine fees. gross benefit acreage shall
I mean all land area within the outermost boundaries of • subtle Loa or
. J development including all areas dedicated for public streets. The fees
, for fractional acreages shall be prorated. The Telegraph Canyon ad.
t
right-of-way and the Telegraph Canyon cheese easement are secluded
from the gross benefit acreage.
Section 4.. Adjustment of Pees. The City Council shall
1\•
periodically, but not less than once annually, review the.amount re the
tee established by this Ordinance. The City Council. brag:duties,
, .
• may adjust the amount of the fee as necessary to reflect c in the
' . Engineering News Aecord Construction Index, the coot of the drainage
facilities, changes in land use designation and other sound engineer .
0 and financing information. The UR Construction Index. for June. 1,30.
. 4
is $4,734.77.
;..
.,'
Section S. Use of Pees. The fees collected pursuant to this
Ordinance shall be deposited in • separate fund as designated by the
*. finance Director and shall be expended only for the following purpose's
. . a. To pay for the construction of facilities by the City, or
. 1 to reimburse the City for facilities installed by the City with
Z., funds from other resources;
• -,
' 1 he b. To robbers* developers or subdividers of propery
have installed all or a portion of the Planned Local Drainage •
01; pica/ties;
c. To repay-indebtedness incurred by the City to construct ,-
• the Planned Drainage Facilities should the City Council determine
to incur such indebtedness;
...
d. To reimburse the City for the cost of engineering and
admini ttttt iv* services to form the district, establish the fee
and construct the facilities.
Section S. Construction of Facilities of Subdivider. The City
" •••• may require, as • condition of !approval of a subdivision, that the • •
. L.,... subdivider contract or finance the construction of all or • portion of ...- •
.., .
41 • the thinned Drainage Facilities. If such • requirement is imposed. the a.
1
. ' ..-. . . ,.
., .
9.1. 1 I
.
.., :.
. •
•,
. .
Nit.. . . . .
•
..„ .
. .
. ... •
, • - ,
- . .
„,J
. -
_ • -
-.
,.....
... .
' •
_, ,•,,-•.1,- .
• -
4 ..,... .„.e„,116.-..■.„„t- Or
----- 6--- .
. _ . .•
. .
. . ..
, •
,
a'
;1•.
_ - ,..
-T.,
... -- ...._.
•
....
•. ---s1.• ii i.- ' -." :. , ..... .
t...,
. . . , .
__-----____ _ _ _ IP s •.
_yr—J.... —. — •,
.. '... ... -4. . 1..
. ,..-...p. .,
. . ..- .,Ntr” . .....,.._
..
....w-
- .. . .,.,,.. • • .
•
. -
" . ...
. .
. ..._
..,
1
L 9 Subdivider shall'. revive a•credit against the tee massed by this e
..d. Ordinance, la,an, amoumt.equal• to. the actual cost of co•structimp ,
including• incidental, expenses. of the. facilities. es verified.,and 44,'
approved by the City.SSgineer. lf.the actual construction cost emceed.. , A'
'u".r, the amount of the tee ch would otherwise a
t_:.''-ti. .,',,.'.` may request-to■bet re foe.the diffeseaee f hoes cell�lietoa '', '�. '
• ' > the City.. The rsiabu�shall be made pursuant to a rslaborssaisaat �•
,};s'. / w
, •grant-entered into betimes the City and Subdivider.
lsatlom 7... Credit for Fees.Prsvieusly Paid: Whenever • building, i .
! permit is•.issued!for a development.project property for which the fees •+ tg
established this. were --1 :'--.e —
by paid at the time o! receiving s• ± g
parceh nap or f i•sl:nap..or.toe'Drainage.Facilities were eoastrnet•d by a"Et
�' 4 the/developer or subdivider of the property. a full. credit for such
payment of construction shall'. be given egotist the fee due •o • /
/ aoaditio•o! the building permit.
;, Seetioe:s. ipplleability to 1.'
and Within County. For those areas
.; of' the Drainage-District within the County of San Diego. the following,
1. . provisions shall.applys:
a.. Vpoh. aelmeation to the City. this Ordinance shall
■ ', immediately become applicable to property located outside of the
jurisdicties boundaries of the City oa the date of adoptiod of s
i ' this Ordinance.
l:r b. Pursuant to section 14140I of the Government Code. the
; City Seglneer. shall file • map of the Telegraph Canyea Drainage S.
'i', District with.the County of Sea Diego. and shall regoast that ail
subdivisions wholly or partially within the District be referred
• ' to the City Engineer for • reecmmandaties. The City Segisser -
i'ai shall review each map for compliance with the Drainage Plan sad
%, shall recommend such conditions or exertions which will ensure
that any subdivision approved by the County shall comply with the
provisions of the Drainage Plan.
•
a. The City shall work with and encourage the County of San
Diego to adopt the Drainage M for the unincorporated area vitiate
the drainage basin..
Section P. !Remotions. The following development project in
exempt from the provisions of this Ordinance.
•
a. Development projects by public entities shall be exempt •
from this Ordinance.
Seethes 10. Definitions. For the purposes of this Ordinance, the
following words or phrases shall be construed as defined in this .
• Section, unless from the context, it appears that a different meaning
!s lntoaded.
aC Y a. 'Building permit' means a pewit required by and issued 'ta
y ` Forewent-lo'the Uniform Ballding Code as adopted by reforms* by <f
•
r this City.
•
yl
r
• ,4
•
1 •
• • "7,-- •.'al-,or ,�_ a,• - . ` •_ _ 7•• _ _ _ _—__._ __--_
; fie { � � �-^-. �
t_
.. ..�. _ .�
.i nevus, �_ .... .� �' _ 5 _ - '.P '.
• : - om...•- A'-tlr- — - _ i
•
• - z •a
.,�
r , —
•
r r, i•-7 '!t"tF,r
r .
i. ' :ay, 4:
t 4,, R yt 16, •Oevelopesnt'project or d•velopsnt• Hens any activity 4
described in Section 46000(•) of the Government Code and includes.
r but is not limited to. ••y activity which remits or may result La
▪ .the physical •lee atlon of land regwirip • •andivisloa map.
I,+: sonlsq permit or spp anal oe permit to build. .
' , ,:.,r.. 4, r .- . •. • 0. Ai•Dr•ie•q• District' means the Telegraph Camps* Drainage
-'} District.-a.described im the Telegraph Canyon Drainage Flaw. E
•r , ;rl,�y prepared by lfilltae Associates and approved by tils Ordinance. '
• -.4." t,-' 'di• •_OratMge Impreeom.at Ssuafit Ares* mew the Telegraph ' „- , 14
the .. t
. ,,- ▪ '-Telegraph Drainage-eDraia ge Pllan. benefit Area described !m a
r Sr.�..'Drainage plan mesas the Telegraph Canyon Drainage Elam.
.� ! •FliwaN 'pnimage Improvam•nt• means the •peaifie
' drainage improve/mat,described le the Drainage Plan.
Section 11. �hos/We a for M Waiver or Mdretiom. any dsvaloper.
4'!,. who, because of the Made or type of uses proposed for a de elopeent i'
.'� psojeet, contends thattapplicatio•of the tee imposed by this ,,
is unconstitutional. or uarelated to purpose for which the fee in
'. , .� imposed or to the hardens of the development. may ly to the C!
Council fora waiver or reduction of the fee. The apapplication shall City - ,
a( :+7 made le writing and filed with the City Clerk not later them ten (10)
`5» day: after notice of, the public hearing on the development permit
> application for the project is given. or if no development permit is
e. * required. at the time of filing of the building peals application.
The application shall state is detail the factual basis for the elaia
;'of waiver or reduction. The City Council shall consider the
application within sixty (f0) days alter its filing. The decision of
' �+�,4;
. .
. . . . . ,
. . . ..
' - • .
, t t: •
. • _
. ..,
. . . . • •
. .
. .
' r....":.777....; ::-':',:•,..:.,7- :.-'.,- ,....;' ,..."- ''' . ' -"," ' , . ...-■.''''''t.'• -•.':-,
- ■.^ C'2.4— .. .- '
r
. , .... ''.'.. ..:4:,-;?..,.. ...4 -
1, . ' ...!.7 '11.;41'''ilio twistutint 1113011TID at • replier meeting of the City Common or 0
' ' -.' ""O('.4.-■' ,.the city,og. Chula Vista. Califorsia, held oe the day Of z .
Irs the following votes
' ••■••, • •
Await -,..,c,f4.. ,.,,,±04'.
r. t. . •,,,,,',',:- , i :--..$4. •I'',. ',: .- ....,
..- I'
' 4.-•-'''' • 4.
t''''". i:' ' AISThIllt.,, •""'i
77 ., k. L'.... , 8. - .•--,'t -.14-:',
/ i 1..n. •.-...„- .
' num t. „-
" , ...• •.,-.- :'.,•..-•,, '. • . - .,, .— . .
. - '.../tS;a;.::.•'' ., ,..'....-":.....,,,' ...:: .7", '" „:
. ' , . , ''' '■'-'1: ' - • -"---1.'-*
...
- ,..
e ''''.-,- . . , ' . NI ■
• -
tin cialta
, ..
.. .• . ,.
. .
, _. .
r."1.-.. Inn or 011.21,0111Th 1
COUNTY We SAM DISCO ) se.
CITY Off CNULA VISTA
Alk
1. . City Clerk of the City of Chola
Vista, California, do hereby certify that the abater and foregoing is •
f - full. true and correct copy of '
and that the sane has not bees emended and repealed.
SATIDo
tity Clerk
. ,
. ,
(seal) •
• . .
•,..7
_,.......
. .
. .
...
. "• . .,
, .
. .
- '
t. ' ' '°. • ',....i. •
.
.,.. . .
.
- -4,-..A.'0:. : .:-..,.. ..-.. . ."-• ,` . ., , .,
. . ...
. . ,. .44- r• ,...,',,•110:...0,
. . .... •
c,."--,'k.;..• i
- '.. . ' • ' . . ..-.' '11'..-.r, 4P
. .
• . ...
—,
..... - .
. .
•. .
- ,
s
• ..- .... ..i.-r4. •••-•:‘ . _ .
. . - .
...„
• - ...
•,. .
. ...,. •-•.-:-
. .
. ,
........ .-.•,. ,,,,,....7-2.4: -!#‘ . ...
. • • • - , ... -
. .
_A* . - •...
. Or 1,-- er"
... —• .. ..:. l'N';• .
. ..... ....
,ii.-.....,4 -.' - • ..
• . . - li•Or• -.
•V
• •,..:r.f. .4.
. ••••--- ,
. .
....... .
•
..•-
. ., • .
, 4.0.., .... '. ''',..i4 I • "
r -
' . .
' .
, _....
- .
. ' .
. . ..,
.
. , . - -
• — .
' • .
. .. .
. . . •
•
ar.---"` --
V .' .. ' . -'L ..: , ' ,,.k- :•-,h.,4i•tt_ ,c-f.
:1/4:.: - ...--:• ;,-;'i--.!: - .
v. ... • .
...4 . i
II I — -r:::--'--.-" - `Vit, `-_..t-k 'Duct or roLic NEARING
„' _„;,... . , .., , ,,.•, ,„ •)”..„,1.1r IT 1112 CITY COWKU.OF TIC C1TT OF
'1- • MLA TESTA. CALITORRIA ...
- • '
. l' '!.•,.1'. 7.ft .,,,4'. ,-,. p ,k
4”-''''' N. '''. 4.',,,,„,•IOTICIt 1111EIDIT WWII DIU'A tWILIC mums WILL BE WELD Ft DE Cllt CONK& ' ,
-et Chile Vista. California, tar the purpose of coesidering the Teleeraph
, \-.7-.,..:... Canyon Drainage"lee and establishing the Telegripb Cease Oralaage Fee.,sett
, ,f.,,'...1:•,...et tee SOS treaty ettbie the Telegraph Cavan Drainage Basle (wily i'Asse
.endeseleped es). Copies et the a:meets are en file Is the itifii....at t.
• . the City near;226 fourth Avenue,Wale Vista.California.
... .._. _.
• t',, • It yes wish ti thiltenge the City's settee as this in court, yea way be
. . t. '. . '`limited to ratites way these issues yam er soweee else raised at tia public ;•
' .
. *., bowing described Is this Notice sr In wittee correspeadso:e delivered to
• Vie City Cleft at sr prier Is the°pilafs Waring.
. -
1410 1011.11 NUIU1111 IWUL le NEW IT TIK cny COINCIL $5 o Tuesday, Jody 17, •••
• '., , . 1990, at 630 p... In Atha Council Chu:bars, Public Services Building. 176
Fourth Awes,at:Wick lime arg person 1k:striae to be beard eel appear.
• .
Ara 29,1110 ,.
• i•
1
..,,
s Beverly A. 'atheist,DC
Gala lista City Clerk
- ,
. ,
_ .
Publish: July 4 eel July 11,1990 .
1Z. .
Z'
•
) .
. k "
—
• r oldsters war modte et pods*Oat I so
onsimmil w Me CIO et PIM Mae It the
- ' * • r 0111s*et as ate area sad ON I posted ot
ems Acesdinseew at the Suletis Mord at
the Ptak SerViSeS*MN:and MI ea
. DAM t .1.1/4r. SWIM . .
f...-44..'v::. .,
. .
. . -.". ,Xti... , ■
* 1 1 ■ ..
. ...... ... ‘ ... '
..... . ,
.. .
. .
-...„
... ,
• .
- ,
. ._ •
. • .
.:...,. ,
. a.
•
. .
• - _ .
_. .
• - .
- • ,-- _ . -.
. .
...\,.v. ..
N...., '
- .
______,.■••••••+api._,..
-
. . . .
-•,,,,..1'... _..
'$1,6 I".
,... ...- - ... a- .... ..k.'
as
..,,
. t...,
' ^
' ......:,,VC.;. .,".yr _-
,- ---:'-'
•
. a,
._
—
... . _
.. 4.6 ....
r- S
-
• .
," •
i - , .
_ . ,.._ _.. ......... _......, .
. .
r +
. . -
{ t F 4.- ,r } i•
• •ti9! - !A.is :. a' a a•` -
1 ,• ! "�►"� f„d" _,law , .,_ w .
. t f • 't't - zip. h� � .;•
1 it
e� i
a
$ k' tw
'.IKYMeN�rMa w__N.as y
L Ines.e said...derwwloso/ ' �_.�
`; Jy`ro + ., , of ' ?!
Y
d fit y• � {fir.' �"I ,,.� w '' +}�.y
. ++�� y T 7- '
J4�9k4'' .h'` i .,Y.:b ` w riw.+� �:.,r-- ! lN,.*
• T +t
MMpyYw«tMwl ' .
lot �. r a Y1r^ .:,k . £, 1,,
- - ':.•-0511' .• 1! .$•_ a u
. . K ' + ! n -.-....,..,4 • y' 1!
— _ 1' 4
-
•
;. ..•
` _i • ..
5• _•44' "r. �. .. — _a•�+C _.. ..? A.
•