The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda Statement 1986/06/10 Item 12 COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item 12 Meeting Date 6/10/86 ITEM TITLE: Resolution Approving the report of the City Engineer for the spread of assessments, Town Centre No. 1 Street Light and Landscape Maintenance District, FY 1986-87 Resolution /a�575 Intention to establish Street Lighting and Landscape Maintenance District for Town Centre No. 1 and setting a date for the public hearing SUBMITTED BY: Director of Public Works/City Engineer vi/ REVIEWED BY: City Manager j t l; ' (4/5ths Vote: Yes No x ) On May 21 , 1985, City Council adopted Resolution No. 12490 ordering the City Engineer to prepare and file a report of assessments for the street lighting and landscape maintenance district for Town Centre No. 1 for fiscal year 1986-87. That report has been prepared and the above resolutions approve the report and set the date for a public hearing to consider the spreading of the assessments. The net assessment has increased by 6% over last year. Individual assessments have been similarly modified. (See attached comparison sheet. ) RECOMMENDATION: That the Council adopt resolutions approving the report and declaring its intention to establish the subject lighting and maintenance district, setting the date of June 24, 1986, for the public hearing. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable. FISCAL IMPACT: None. JWH:fp WPC 1032E i ,_, ,,. . „., , c E ;.y c,T.,,;,cil of by ' I �." Chula Vsta, Caifornia Dated IA-k- (d+-6— - COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item 13 Meeting Date 6/10/86 ITEM TITLE: Resolution " Approving the negotiated property tax exchange and other agreements relating to the Otay Valley/Palm Avenue reorganization SUBMITTED BY: Director of Finance Director of Planning REVIEWED BY: City Manager j h,. (4/5ths Vote: Yes No X ) On November 5, 1985, the City Council initiated the reorganization of 566 acres of land currently located within the City of San Diego. The property was located east of I-805 and south of the Otay River. Subsequently on March 18, 1986, the Council amended its previous application to only include two separate parcels totaling 242 acres. The revision was due to property owner opposition. A property tax exchange is now required before LAFCO can act on the reorganization. RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt the resolution. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable. DISCUSSION: A number of actions have occurred with respect to this reorganization thus far. The General Plan Designation and Prezoning have been established. The City of San Diego has consented to the detachment. LAFCO Commission action is pending July 7, 1986, once their staff is in receipt of property tax resolutions from each city, San Diego and Chula Vista. The City of San Diego is expected to adopt a similar resolution on June 10, 1986. This is the final action required to move this item forward to a public hearing before LAFCO. The total property tax is proposed to revert to the City of Chula Vista. In addition, the resolution calls for an agreement between the City of San Diego and the City of Chula Vista. The subject of the agreement would be three conditions. First, a condition to indemnify the City of San Diego for any taxes which might accrue because certain water and sewer lines are now in the City of Chula Vista instead of the City of San Diego. Presently, there are no such taxes on such public facilities regardless of the jurisdiction. The issue is moot unless the State Constitution should be amended in the future. Nonetheless, the City of San Diego wants the protection language included at this point. Page 2, Item 13 Meeting Date 6/10/86 A second condition calls for a commitment by the property owners in question to participate in the funding of improvements contained in the City of San Diego' s Otay Mesa Public Facilities Financing Plan. The properties are currently part of the overall Otay Mesa assessment district financing proposal . San Diego feels the properties should remain a part of the financing package and responsible for their fair share commitment. We agree. Finally, a condition is included giving San Diego unrestricted access to their utility easements in place in the area. This is not perceived as a problem. FISCAL IMPACT: A total of $9,417 will be reallocated to the City of Chula Vista. WPC 2869P ( 1 )4A`'-1"-32 by. tie City Council of Chula Vista, California Dated -*�. c!' / I ,�r EXHIBIT "A" NEGOTIATED PROPERTY TAX DISTRIBUTION LAFCO Proposal: Otay Valley/Palm Avenue Reorganization LAFCO Number: R085-23 Proposed Proposed Current Base Current Annual Base Annual Tax Local Agencies Distribution Tax Increment Distribution Increment County General $11,769 .25841621 $11,769 .25841621 San Diego Unified Port District -0- .00000000 -0- .00000000 City of San Diego (Detach) 9,417 .20678675 -0- .00000000 City of Chula Vista (Annex) -0- .00000000 9,417 .20678675 All Other Taxing Agencies 24,355 .53479704 24,355 .53479704 $45,541 1.00000000 $45,541 1.00000000 Basis for Exchange: The current base taxes received by the detaching City are being reallocated to the annexing City. The annual tax increment formerly received by the detaching City is being reallocated to the annexing City of Chula Vista. WPC 2870P sJ Y \ i. 1 • co � _ ,P� I t t Q z +• r w a co#\ / . r ) : U) QN ,f-r \\ Z H Q 1 I ' O C z . C d1 >. Q (� is ' . re ri O a W I fQ 4 e x V_ �'\ a'i >1 I O _M\\ t '` 11 m {:{�: CO ��^p�, ■N N I Ai .: ! �j a t \\ £ ' 1�N o Yo ixrr .... ■ I.., :,1 ../'•' 0 sr. I \ o — O i ~ \ -A l t�11 '• roiNT— '06 °.!o0 >• U 1J + \ ......�__� / 3 ppL w '.. .\ , µo�tS 0- Q I _J i -\` - O Y AY IN, ° �I `O �— `` f l, r 5 0:: w i 41 s M« 3^ a. _t• v. OT J7 45%; .. JtA i J+T ; / • 1 s u YW O 7 Y 2 • v 0.--,-= C /!T• 5 I )f „� o III F•ilig d;`` oo V V,4,,,,,,„.0 . ` •i t N V a t c w tI.o N N ' il f F .• > N a i< NO � a % u.- ': ::'' Y 3 1.3_ 1G 44 r z s. 1IJ 0 i ° ° Y •o. u w.nl+It �. ,'� ` M _ INl z 4 0 . 0 r-i 2,V w.I NUS :.� ®� ` (� N, ,IN,n 6a a � 3 R�1 if L 'V •` YO., C° ®_� V YN3YY35 Ii SO I> 'f N Y° t 4 0JM ` .lt \\\ yU • � bvY°•5.y” a.T+ �1 � WM�M6•.,. �YINJ3 Vii+ o •V , MEIN - 1 a J\ J �'k� a YYY �.N Ml } s 1 1 L;S® L • f ?� to E.> nN,y 0 IJ ��E� ® . A,., As /Iv'• Ill ®® I� :nr oYr»,+ = NO aooMS2Y+1 '' • M, J* y ✓ > .,S SNU.�M er. aA(Yt s� G , •aY • Q 2 J � ,,` Y . 033 J liom; zlc� '< 3 7�F . °� _.:u ' .t . . ,. s , j sx,o. BSI i �� t N,, :L mho imiii.,,,-,,,,,..,.,‘ .• .,-- .._ .._•" • , ,.will ›. . , . . , I ? ,L , , ,}. „, , ..: ,