The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda Statement 1986/05/20 Item 18 COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item -9-18 5 10 Meeting Date ITEM TITLE: PCZ 86-C - Consideration to prezone approximately 98 acres of territory located between 1-805 and Rios Avenue and between Rancho Drive and the north facing slopes of the Otay Valley to A-8 (Agriculture) and F-1 (Floodway) zones. - City of Chula Vista Ordinance 2/9 Approving the prezoning of 98 acres located between 1-805 and Rios Avenue and between Rancho Drive and the north facing slopes of the Otay Valley to A-8 and F-1 SUBMITTED BY: Planning Director (Q?L SECOND F EADii' O AN L) I DOL'TiON REVIEWED BY: City Manager err '� (4/5ths Vote: Yes No X ) The City of Chula Vista has filed applications with the Local Agency Formation Commission for the purpose of annexing territory presently located in the City of San Diego and within the boundaries of the approved Sphere of Influence for the City of Chula Vista. The area must be prezoned before the annexation applications can be processed and considered. The project is exempt from environmental review as a Class 19 exemption. RECOMMENDATION: Concur with Planning Commission recommendation and adopt the ordinance. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: On April 9, 1986, the Planning Commission with one member absent, unanimously recommended that the City Council enact an ordinance to prezone said 98 acres in accordance with Resolution PCZ-86-C. DISCUSSION: Existing site characteristics._ The area proposed for prezoning lies within the Otay Valley and is diagonally traversed by the Otay River from the northeast corner to the southwest corner. The southerly portion is characterized by very steep slopes. The project area is comprised of 10 parcels totaling 98.14 acres. The properties are vacant except for the property located at 1820 Rios Avenue which is developed with a single-family dwelling. Page 2, Item 9 18 _.. Meeting Date 4444446 5/20/86 General plan. The Otay Mesa-Nestor Community Plan of the City of San Diego designates the northwesterly portion of the project area (north of the Otay River) as "Low Density Residential - 5 to 10 DU's/acre" and the General Plan of Chula Vista designates the same area as "Medium Density Residential - 4 to 12 DU' s/acre". Both plans designate the Otay River as "Parks and Open Space". The area south of river is also shown as "Parks and Open Space" by San Diego. At the present time, this area is not designated on Chula Vista's General Plan. A General Plan amendment to designate the area "Agriculture and Reserve" is the previous agenda item. Existing Zoning. The City of San Diego has zoned the Otay River FW (Floodway) and both sides of the river A-1-10 (Agriculture). The adjacent zoning and land uses are as follows: North R-2 Single family attached (Playmor) South R-1-5 (S.D.) Single family detached East A-8 (C.V. Prezone) Vacant West R-V-15 & A-70-8 Single family and vacant ANALYSIS: It is recommended that the area be prezoned in similar zoning classification as it is presently zoned in the City of San Diego. The Otay River is proposed to be prezoned F-1 (Floodway) and both sides of river prezoned A-8 (Agriculture, 8 acres minimum). The A-8 zoning would function as a holding zone until definitive plans for the area are proposed by the property owners. FISCAL IMPACT: None at this time WPC 2735P (72(-71.,1_, �� , C ✓� 4 , ‘511 . by the City Council of by thr City Council of Chula Vista, California Chula Vista, California Dated �m Dated ar . 11 - --- RS6-' . 1 . ■ r Ito RS6 R3P-1 2 L\ ' 11111 MAIN ST ,OND eIII quimnim R-2-P r El , ,, Eil m ali 83 • "MIR _ 4 , I sill , , .1 M El al • t'S`S' Too, g 307 11‘11110 . : i- --; ; ■ ■ '-':----- cas), , A.,41 <3:k...-.;) H- s. 11 -„,, R-2 6123 st b8 . EE1 .. Ba a 1 15 iffei 69 93 m. HZ RAT0E13 Ei E9 ra E RV E1 i _______ , 1 n fil @ FtG"C CMT ep EE3 Lti PEJ i, .2 pp MEd I R-3- Ed Ei3 11,>--,z E-13 911 mina EE1 03 ZS ZS .• **I.:13 P-1 1.. • all . . --i-- ' :: ill LI:t,'Pa Ee °D. E5 E9 133'6Z' 0,08 B3 B3 e60 It'pa EEI 2 Mill 11111111111111 ---i---..9] fr .. - Q= EB 1 DIA E33 a3 ED ER , z Ea 0:3 Ea EE ER . . 1 . 1 Ea . _ . , , 1 , Milammi M la ---- ,_ _ . . .. .' ii...i.,... NM MI ;' CIT OF SAN '1E4''"..:: .. -•- ,11111/11t- . . ' 1.1. MOM Marl II". Mall al 16 .....„ :.A...„, 0 111111.1 ''''18: 1° A-8 PREZONE:: ::-- - ......... .. -Sill -• 1 1111 M& 1111A L • •I F-1 1111 0 :PREZO NE . w•• FW . • -I! A70 8 f S.:D.Y tv.,8 A PREZONE , FW IS:1 D3 . 1 loll •:., FINNEY • 'kil I Para 1 lb ,. ELEMENTARY fil ,,, , ....flu*. ......,,, „ SCHOOL ii ,J.,, MEE Jinni ill 11111111110 wir NI E t..mis 0 POWDERHORN _ 11,is r l' illi ST 1:111.114H11111 111 {1g R-1-5 11111 11 111 Will 1;-------k LEMONSEED DRIVE ) ---- m 1 I 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 )- I Ilir PALM AVE. 1 ummumummuumusm among! ol_moriZ. WANE 111111.1111L 111111, EXHIBIT A FENTON/LAKE PREZONE . . _ •PCZ-86-C 200' 0 400' PROPOSED PREZONING OF APPROXIMATELY 98 ACRES TO A-8, AGRICULTURAL ZONE & F-1, FLOODWAY ZONE. 400' 100' 200' Planning Commission Meeting -2- April 9, 1986 3. PUBLIC HEARING: PCZ-86-C - CONSIDERATION TO ''REZONE APPROXIMATELY 98 ACRES OF TERRITORY LOCATED BETWEEN I-805 AND RIOS AVENUE AND BETWEEN RANCHO DRIVE AND THE NORTH-FACING SLOPES OF THE OTAY VALLEY TO AGRICULTURE AND FLOODWAY ZONES Associate Planner Livag pointed out that the area for prezoning covered 98 acres (with the exclusion of two Fenton Lake parcels located at the south end) and was a prerequisite to annexation. The proposed zoning is essentially a mirror-image of the present San Diego City zoning; and as there are no existing facilities to serve the property on the south, additional studies would be necessitated. Letters of approval have been received from H.G. Fenton and from Mr. Lake. Mr. Livag added that the proposed zoning would function as a holding zone until definitive plans for this area are proposed • by the property owners. This being the time and the place as advertised, the public hearing was opened. Ruth J. Schneider, 1042 Piccard Avenue, San Diego 92154, representing the Otay Mesa-Nestor Planning Committee, stated her organization's opposition to the change of hands from one municipality alit to another. In response to her er question, she was informed that the "facilities" included sewer b and water as well as access to the south side of the property; topography, a bridge might be considered to provide access to the south side. Mrs. Schneider commented that area a d had for been thedreasonse she hadpstatedcin because of that difficulty o f access; the previous agenda item, she was in opposition to the annexation. Richard W. Neill , 11432 Rolling Hills Drive, El Cajon, 92020, representing Louis M. Lake, TR, also present, said the considered effort being made by Chula Vista to improve areas fri within development rof of e Influence property hhave nnotebeen their wish to annex; plans fo finalized, however, the flood areas cutting across the property will need to be controlled; a recreation park tand of fishing eucalyptus trees envisioned (located utilization of the. area containing the supportive west of I-805) ; plus the possibility of single-family units with supp commercial development is anticipated; plans for access to the southern side nt of the property await further of study structuren over the flood channel of w ul d ebe property owners but some sort He concluded saying they intend development of the property to provide an eye-opening entryway into the City of Chula Vista. No one else wishing to speak, the public hearing was closed. MSUC (Tugenberg/Guiles) (6-0) (Agriculture) and FClun(Floodway) as shown ordinance in prezoning the territory 9 Exhibit A attached to the staff report. C}