HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Statement 1986/09/16 Item 24 COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item 24
Meeting Date 9/16/86
ITEM TITLE: RESOLUTION/ 7 Z7 Approving Variance Granted by the Board of Appeals and
Advisors regarding Swimming Pool Fence at 4080 Bermuda Dunes Place
SUBMITTED BY: Acting Director of Building and Housingv P6 (4/5ths Vote: Yes No x )
REVIEWED BY: City Manager'
On September 8, 1986 the Board of Appeals and Advisors heard an appeal presented by the
property owner at 4080 Bermuda Dunes Place for an exemption from the 5-foot high City pool
fencing requirement. Pursuant to Section 15.48.060 of the Municipal Code, the recommenda-
tion of the Board is forwarded to Council for review and approval .
RECOMMENDATION: That Council accept the Board's findings and recommendation for approval
of the existing 32-foot high enclosure for the installation of a new spa.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Acceptance of the Board' s findings and recommendation
for approval of the appeal .
DISCUSSION:
A swimming pool was installed in 1965 on this property abutting the Municipal Golf Course in
a wedge shaped lot on two sides. At the time of installation the fence measuring 3 feet in
height above the lot pad and 32 to 4 feet above the golf course grade was legal . Sometime
in the early 1970' s, the required fencing height was raised to 5 feet. This has not been
enforced retroactively.
The property owner now wishes to have a spa installed in the pool area. The addition of the
spa could necessitate the erection of a 5-foot high fence around the spa, leaving this pool
legally protected by the existing 32-foot high fence. CC&R's imposed upon the Bonita Verde
development prohibit fences abutting the golf course in excess of 3 feet in height.
The rear and sides of the lot are well protected from toddlers by the inaccessibility of the
golf course and the fence and dense shrubbery screening the pool . The pool area is pro-
tected from neighborhood children by a 5-foot high fence and gate with self-closing and
self-latching devices on both sides of the house.
In staff' s opinion, the present fencing will adequately protect the pool-spa area. Neither
the pool nor the proposed spa are attractive nuisances since they cannot be seen from any-
where off of the lot.
The Board unanimously approved the exemption from the 5-foot high fencing requirements and
recommends Council 's acceptance of the existing 32-foot high fence as adequate protection
for the installation of the new spa.
Pool fencing appeal decisions are the only Board of Appeal 's actions required by City
Ordinance to be reviewed by Council . If Council considers this review process an unnecessar
duplication of time and effort, please so -indicate so that necessary changes can be prepared
for consideration.
FISCAL IMPACE: None
the City Council of
Chula Vista, California
Form A-113 (Rev. 11/79) Dated " ii______ mmigg,'
4`0 S v �t--/'/rlvl0i� �v.t/ 5"-P..—.--,1G dreY:0 iL�,YI .4i►" : , 1 +-rte' ' --dt ' ;,, ca.'� .,
l '
I ____, 711%,
art
Mrs• ` ;
•
T
:,%.:-"P... * - v. S - • ,p +• -a ,
-,.,_,., , ,, . ,..;`,z,.,,vVz,...,-4-,. ."`", ' ''v..4:-.1:',4•4,1(`',-., ,.-4,-t**,4,,,-,-±,- ,,,, ---
$e„
T x � .a
-
.-'r'Fs
B .
,..
••,•-710S-6 / -•
.. .
•. ... ——.441744410.k
. -k,,,...• :4, .1•F./4,.) „,,.•
.. ' - 1 af r.,,J - '*'• ..t4s
,,,,•, e" ':4 faer- , ,e-• 1-1$ 1,
•L Ile ', #
Al'Y;m ..%10.4 .7.1 il . . 4 14 • IL.: 9 1r . . A
,. IJ • ' •14# ,
th. *; '''' • w •- .. ,. ..,#•,":'. 1 i--441
.-
--4..:,..
...• , - ', If- 'mi.1,4--. ,•
40, 4 ,„„ , - „,..,,„
......,....>„- •-•,. ,,
-40. % -.. . ; - ., .. ft,
, , 1.-,14. . •-J.•,.. - . . ...1.,_fr °I
,.... .. • e .‘ " ...' '" ' f 4 7•;.' ':it " ' '- A a•:. 494"
re ."''t • '..'''''4'.- *•.• '..• .,,f; ' 4 . . ' =--: • 41(1
.. . • .
i fit. 1 . - i, •
"..` ' ,e , Ak, A •
. .
- :•
", - • w ,
. ••-
,------
„.- ..
-- ,.....ww
w,:...
•
--.-:-= '
,-----...„., .4 - --' . •••• -...:. - iiiroo"
./ Nit•,,'Nf
, - Irwk ; .,•,' Ak " ' •.%- •
,)..•,• . " lip, 4 4 .c? - i yk .. '' •
•••
, . .10- .•-••4 •' #- I '•• •41g. '.'1
-,
le."-r,• ''" _
C.
• "**.i. ,-' f
V • . .
6,0 , ).•
: i•./, ... tk, -, ' .0 1",P•
,t .. ..... , 1
' +N••• -,• ' ' -4( 4 ••• ‘• )••
•-,.. ' •,- 4,4.,
- f.,';'‘',`.:v•A"' '.+44e.'"6':.t. ..,‘•
, .. ,1 * .-..
......p .--..".kA:4' •I-T -87„:+.... '' •-. ,,,,„t,
• *.(,,,,,It.i,. ':,i;,..)
..", • l'L" '2 Cpy,' • .. , 49 ,. ..,
,.. .. ,„, ,.. ... „ ?,4 , . 1
..h .No ,,.. • ••• .c.,,,..,„ 7., ....,
, 1:7, */!,-;./■'• rt. • - 011r,„•..‘.
.
.,.
' P i
.• - 4 41( tt V) ""le ".1t-W ' '".• .... • •.• '
' - .4.i.;
. •w..N .4 5. r. tr • 4,4 • ft 7
..... •,: ;, ,01
4.- ,- ..1.„, '.. • ' .. 44-, -, ,ir. . ‘ -
' ' ag',., 1/4:,•Jilt,:•.'. . 'co'
"n• .w.,..tisrcie , ...‘••'4 x.„'. " ,
• ••...re- I" 4 '.. •..... .,0,• t. ..a. j s....
•....
'' ii.4 J....t. ,
4.- kk \Ito; • ' 1-
.4"1St pl..." .P e- tr, • '.. ' . .
' .-.• ., est L.t.,.,.., - e4,44,- '
lif2'4.. -• ' +4, .f.'•4114''''•; ..
' t
0.
. ' '' .01 '4.•,d.' Al;'4, /.,e, : .. .. . .,,,
Vitra'••■ ; ..,,.:,`'' 't. ; -fr ' -
1 I -, ;t.--„js;■,,,;., ,,... ..1,,,„;:4,-.2. ' , 1, ' 1.1:44 '"4.P-^#7 . . '''' '' ' 4.44
''''',. % ''.;. ';" 7"7 'til '' 't'
'1,';:t • 4.,...--P41.'1,' "X '-', ''''•*., V *: '''''••• -•*% ,4 • 'Z,4 * )
,.,,,i ,' . 0 0 irl ,,,. ;:ottl
1.•1
AL ',.,-!= 4 ,
t : ' '-
-'s .A.-!,0. I, .,
•
. . -
..,
* * , • ,. .
, . . .
' . . .
..•
t■ .
1 ' /
... ...... .... .