HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 1990-15762 RESOLUTION NO. 15762
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
#046 TO THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND
ROHR INDUSTRIES FOR THE INSTALLATION OF FENCING AND GUARD
RAIL IN THE MIDBAYFRONT SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS OF
APPROVAL IN ATTACHMENT A
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby resolve as
follows:
WHEREAS, the proposed project is exempt from environmental review under
the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines pursuant to Section
15303 Class 3(e); and,
WHEREAS, the Chula Vista Bayfront Local Coastal Program (LCP) was
certified by the California Coastal Commission; and,
WHEREAS, said LCP includes coastal development permitting procedures
determined by the Coastal Commission to be legally adequate for issuance of
Coastal Development Permits; and,
WHEREAS, the City of Chul a Vista has assumed permit authority over the
Chula Vista Coastal Zone; and,
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on August 7, 1990, in accordance with
said permitting procedures; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, as approving
authority, has reviewed the proposal for installation of fencing and guard
rail in the Midbayfront.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula
Vista finds, based on the following findings, in accordance with Section 13311
of the California Administrative Code, that installation of the fencing and
guard rail is consistent with the policies of the Chula Vista Bayfront LCP.
1. The Statewide and Regional Interpretive Guidelines have been reviewed and
the development conforms with the requirements of Section 30604(c) of the
Public Resources Code. That Section states that for every coastal
development permit issued for any development between the nearest public
road and the shoreline, a specific finding shall be made that such
development is in conformity with the public access and public recreation
policies of Chapter 3. The analysis of the conformity with those
policies follows.
a. The fencing and guard rail will limit the place and manner of
public access as provided for in Section 30214. This will protect
Resolution No. 15762
Page 2
wetl and habi tat and private property rights until the property
planned for public park use in the certified LCP is dedicated to
the City. At that time valuable habitat will be protected and
buffered and public access opportunities will be provided.
b. The proposed project will not foreclose the opportunity for use of
the Bayfront for water oriented recreational activities consistent
with Section 30220.
c. The proposed project does not include development of oceanfront
land that is suitable for coastal dependent aquaculture, consistent
with Section 30222.2.
d. Consistent with Section 30221, the proposed project does not
contemplate the use of oceanfront land suitable for recreational
use for other types of development.
e. The proposed fencing and guard rail installation does not propose
to utilize private lands suitable for visitor serving commercial
recreational facilities for other purposes, consistent with Section
30222.
f. The proposed project does not propose to develop upland areas
necessary to support coastal recreational uses for other purposes,
consistent with Section 30223.
g. Consistent with Section 30224, the proposed project does not
preclude future increased recreational boating use of coastal
waters or other marine related uses.
2. Consistent with Section 30240(b) of the Public Resources Code, the
fencing and guard rail are sited to prevent impacts which could
significantly degrade the adjacent areas. The fences and guard rail are
located in upland areas to minimize any potential impacts on wetland
species.
3. The implementation of the fencing and guard rail will not preclude
implementation of the certified LCP. The fencing and guard rail are an
effort to minimize unauthorized dumping in environmentally sensitive
habitat areas until the 11.5 acre Rohr property is developed and the
properties west of Marina Parkway area are developed as parks and open
space consistent with the certified LCP.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista
hereby issues Coastal Development Permit ~046 for the install ation of fencing
and guard rail in the Midbayfront subject to the Conditions of Approval in
Attachment A.
Presented by Appn ved as to rm by
Chrls ~a~omone Boogaard
Community Development Director City Attorney
Resolution No. 15762
Page 3
ATTACHMENT A
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1. The +500 linear feet of chain link fence on the Rohr property shall be
tempFrary. The permanent solution for security of the site (if needed)
and protection of adjacent wetlands shall be addressed when a Coastal
Development Permit is considered for the development of the Rohr
Industries ll.5-acre property.
2. The chain link fence shall be green vinyl clad to minimize the adverse
aesthetic impacts associated with installation of chain link fence.
3. The proposed color for the guard rail shall be approved by the Planning
Department Design Review staff prior to installation. The proposed color
shall be consistent with the natural earth tones of the existing
environment.
Resolution No. 15762
Page 4
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Chula
Vista, California, this 7th day of August, 1990 by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers: Moore, Nader, Cox
NOES: Councilmembers: None
ABSENT: Councilmembers: Malcolm, McCandliss
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers: None
Cox, M
ATTEST:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) ss.
CITY OF CHULA VISTA }
I, Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk of the City of Chula Vista, California, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 15762 was duly passed,
approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista,
California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 7th day of
August, 1990.
Executed this 7th day of August, 1990.
~e~riy 'A'~'~uthe~e~,"Ci~y Cierk