Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Statement 1987/04/07 Item 17 COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item 17 Meeting Date 4- 7-8 7 ITEM TITLE: Ordinance a/7e Adopting the County of San Diego Zoning Ordinance for the Proposed Bonita-Sunnyside Fire Protection Annexation SUBMITTED BY: Director of Planning G SECOND READING AND ADOPTION's REVIEWED BY: City Manager?, (4/5ths Vote: Yes No X ) On March 17, 1987, City Council continued this item and requested additional information as to the need and timing for such action and how it compared with Montgomery processing. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the ordinance to become effective December 31 , 1987, if the petition is approved by the voters on the November 1987 ballot. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable. BACKGROUND: On February 10, 1987, a petition was filed with LAFCO to annex 7.7 square miles of the Bonita Sunnyside Fire Protection District to the City of Chula Vista. In addition to the dissolution of the Fire Protection District, some territory would be detached from the Spring Valley Sanitation District. In early February LAFCO contacted City staff and expressed concern about various legal steps and processes that had to be completed in a timely fashion if the issue was going to be on the ballot in November 1987. A time schedule of those steps is indicated in Figure 1 . Among the things LAFCO indicated, the City would have to do were the following: 1 . Prezone the territory and conduct environmental review. 2. Provide LAFCO with information on anticipated City costs and revenues so that LAFCO can complete a Fiscal Impact Analysis. 3. Negotiate a Property Tax Agreement with San Diego County including terms and conditions for the fire district employees, the branch library and County park lands status. 4. Negotiate terms and conditions with the Spring Valley Sanitation District on terms and conditions for the transfer of capacity and any capital improvements. Staff has started working on these items in response to LAFCO' s request. Page 2, Item 17 Meeting Date 4_7_87 With respect to the pre-zoning, LAFCO feels that the prezoning should be predetermined at this point in time so as to not prejudice the elections. Further, they have requested the action occur before they have to prepare their report to the LAFCO Commission. They view what happened on the Montgomery Re-organization as the exception to the process and not the rule. PREZONING DISCUSSION: When Montgomery was annexed to Chula Vista in 1985, the City Council passed an emergency ordinance adopting the County of San Diego Zoning Ordinance as an interim control subsequent to December 31 , 1985. A similar process is anticipated should Bonita decide to annex the City of Chula Vista. A policy similar to the one adopted for Montgomery with respect to Planning and Zoning is also contemplated. That policy would be as follows: "County zoning regulations will continue to prevail while a study is conducted to determine the relationship of existing development. County zoning regulations and proposed City zoning for the area. The Sweetwater Planning Committee will review these issues and make recommendations to the Planning Commission and City Council on a proposed zoning plan." this action would implement that policy and only become effective subsequent to voter approval of the annexation proposal . Not affected would be non-zoning regulations such as the Building Code, Subdivision Ordinance, and Environmental Review procedures. These would be as per the City of Chula Vista' s requirements, as would other policies and standards not referenced by the Zoning Ordinance. Fees for application would be paid in accordance with County fee schedules for various types of actions. The County' s Animal Regulations are a part of the County Zoning Ordinance and thus would be carried over as is with the adoption of this ordinance. It should be noted that in conjunction with a recent meeting the Mayor had with some Bonita residents, the Planning Department has been asked to analyze the City and County provisions for horse lots, compare the animal regulations between the two jurisdictions, and look at regulations and policies as to equestrian trail development and maintenance. That work has not started to date. As to environmental review in conjunction with the pre-zoning, Section 15378(b) of the State CEQA Guidelines defines activities which are not a project. One of those activities is "The submittal of proposals to a vote of the people of the state or a particular community." FISCAL IMPACT: None. frid/i/t4idel APC 3703P by the ity Council of by the City Council of Chula Vista, California Chula Vista, California G -7 Dated d Dated